Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Google’s AI Overviews Lowered Reddit’s Traffic. Its Stock Dropped 29%
  2. Two US Senators Raise Privacy Concerns About Meta’s ‘Pervert Glasses’
  3. Supersonic Airliner In Doubt As Company Shifts to Powering AI Data Centers
  4. Google’s First Data Center Satellite Is Online and Writing Poetry
  5. Cisco Gives Engineer Unlimited AI Tokens To Rewrite Legacy Code
  6. Apple Is Entering Its Slop Era
  7. Meta Settles Another Social Media Addiction Case Just Before Trial
  8. Sam Altman Thinks Your PC Is Wasting Precious RAM
  9. Thousands of ‘Ghost Students’ Use AI to Steal Millions In Student Loans, DOJ Says
  10. US Tech Stocks See Sharp Falls As AI Spending Nears $1 Trillion
  11. GM Reaches $220 Million Settlement Over Selling Drivers’ Private Data
  12. UK Social Media Ban May Lock Out More Than 100,000 Teens Without ID
  13. Reddit Will Force Everyone to Log In
  14. Binance Suffers Biggest Crypto Hack In History With $6.3 Billion Affected [UPDATE]
  15. The Tragedy of Losing Your Wikipedia Page

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Google’s AI Overviews Lowered Reddit’s Traffic. Its Stock Dropped 29%

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Reddit’s stock plunged 29.22% on Friday, reports CNBC, its worst drop since becoming a public company in 2024.

Thursday Reddit reported a sales growth that was weaker than previous quarters, and also forecast weak sales for the quarter to come (below analysts expectations):
The report comes as the company has seen a shift in its search referral traffic with the rise of Google’s AI Overview. In an interview with CNBC, Reddit CEO Steve Huffman said search-referral traffic from Google went “down meaningfully in this quarter” due to AI… Multiple analysts downgraded the stock following Reddit’s disappointing results, with Citizens noting that “search changes highlight the problem with selling content to Google” and that as referral problems worsen, uncertainty around user growth amid the login requirement switch “puts more pressure on user monetization.”
Reddit’s CEO also said that forcing users to login will help the company’s advertising business. “Reddit is the last platform to provide basically unfettered logged-out access, and that’s largely because of me. I’ve been holding that line.”

“I think users will probably go through the same understanding that I have, which is that it’s a sign of the times. It’s an evolution of how these platforms work.”

Making Things Harder

By darkain • • Score: 4 • Thread

“we’ve seen a massive drop in views, so we’re making it more difficult for people to view our content”

Damn, that’s an amazing business idea! Wish I had thought of it.

The rise of Google’s AI Overview

By Mirnotoriety • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread
Google originally made money by scraping extracts from other people’s content, directing users to their websites and making money from AdSense advertising. Now, with Google pushing its own AI-generated answers to the top of search results, people have even less reason to visit the original sites.

Of course, in Reddit’s case, there’s a certain irony. Reddit itself relies heavily on unpaid user-generated content. So perhaps there’s a degree of poetic justice here. It’s not quite the same loss as an independent publisher losing traffic to work produced by paid journalists.

Two US Senators Raise Privacy Concerns About Meta’s ‘Pervert Glasses’

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Meta’s smart glasses face new questions from two U.S. Senators, reports Gizmodo. Oregon Sen. Ron Wyden and Massachusetts Sen. Edward Markey “are requesting that Meta provide more information before Thanksgiving on whether it conducted detailed human rights due diligence and safety testing on the product before releasing it,” reports Gizmodo. The Senators also requested information from Meta about " how it evaluated the privacy risks posed by the glasses, and what kinds of safeguards are currently in place.”
“Although Meta identified risks to bystander privacy and vulnerable populations before launching its glasses in 2021, it nevertheless launched a product tailor-made for invading the privacy of its users and bystanders,” [the senators wrote in a letter Thursday…] The glasses have also been spotted on ICE agents during raids, and have raised potential surveillance concerns. The surveillance fears were even reportedly raised by the New York Police Department’s counterterrorism unit in a memo issued earlier this year....

“Meta’s own disclosures confirm that imagery processed through its glasses’ visual AI features may be retained and used to train AI systems, including with the assistance of human reviewers,” the senators’ letter states, calling the practice an invasion of privacy. “Retaining that material for AI development, thereby extending the period during which it can be accessed, disclosed, or misused, exploits people’s highly sensitive information for Meta’s commercial benefit.”

Someone explain this to me…

By sarren1901 • • Score: 3 • Thread

While it’s nice to go after Meta, we all hate them anyway, aren’t we missing out on all the AI training being done on all the media created on cellphones that automatically backup to the cloud?

Seems like the same thing to me, since there’s no data protection laws in this country anyway. Anything sent to the cloud is going to be sold as data and it’s perfectly legal.

These two senator’s, if they cared about privacy, would be pushing national consumer data protection laws.

So by all means, let’s fuck with Meta, but let’s not pretend it’s just them. It’s all of them.

Supersonic Airliner In Doubt As Company Shifts to Powering AI Data Centers

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Boom Supersonic’s plans to launch its Overture passenger jet by 2029 are facing growing doubts as the company pivots toward manufacturing natural gas turbines for AI data centers. Ars Technica reports:
One of the company’s first customers, United Airlines CEO Scott Kirby, has expressed doubts about Boom’s original plan to deliver the first Overture supersonic airliner in 2029. Kirby’s latest frank assessment came during an interview with the Office Hours: Business Edition podcast that appeared on October 28, 2026. "‘29 is their official timeline,” Kirby told podcast host Monica Langley. “It’s not going to happen in ‘29 — it’s going to take longer.”

[…] Much of Boom’s recent focus has been on developing natural gas turbines to power AI data centers as an additional revenue stream. On October 22, the company unveiled another factory in Centennial, Colorado, dedicated to producing a 42-megawatt natural gas turbine called Superpower for data centers. […] Boom described its new Superpower factory as making turbine parts while still undergoing construction. It aims to deliver the first gas turbines to AI data center customers in mid-2027 while ramping up annual production to 25 turbines in 2028 and 50 turbines by 2029.

[…] Still, Boom has characterized the development of a gas turbine for data centers as being synergistic with its design of the Symphony engine for the Overture airliner. During the October announcement, it also described having completed a prototype turbine core, called Sprint Core, that is intended to eventually power both the Superpower gas turbine and Symphony engine for the airliner. That turbine core is set to undergo testing at the Colorado Air & Space Port, with Boom planning to fire the turbine for the first time before Thanksgiving. That would be a concrete development milestone, but the company still has much to do in proving it can get both its AI data center and supersonic airliner ventures off the ground.

Scott Manley

By Tomahawk • • Score: 4, Informative • Thread
This was mentioned in a recent Scott Manley video where he tours the factory. Iirc they can create a quite efficient power plant based on their supersonic engine design. And if it builds revenue while they continue to build their plane, that makes sense.

Re:Someone should really start killing these AI CE

By Tony Isaac • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread

The natural progression of the AI bubble will result in a fate worse than death for these CEOs: they will be sidelined when their decisions to turn their companies into AI companies, end in financial disaster.

I’m not saying AI as a technology will fail. I’m saying that there’s going to be a financial bloodbath because too many companies piled on all at once, far outstripping any semblance of realistic ambition. When a shoe company thinks it can pivot to become an AI company, we have truly jumped the shark.

For a company to remain successful, above all, they have to understand who they are. A shoe company, a jet company, whatever. These might not be as alluringly profitable as an “AI company” but by forgetting who they are, they become just another AI groupie.

Re:Scott Manley

By drinkmorejava • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread
Well that’s the thing. I was a GE Aviation engineer for years. I’m well aquainted with the growing pains on LM2500s and 6000s, and they’ve had all manner of issues despite being built on cores with millions of hours of experience. It’s not the limited runs that’s problematic, it’s the zero real world use.

Ah so the AI datacenter speculative bubble

By hdyoung • • Score: 3 • Thread
Has made it to THAT stage. During the mortgage crisis, a few years before the whole thing imploded and we nearly had another Great Depression, every in-crisis company was announcing that they were switching to mortgage processing and real estate finance. What was their business previously? Didnt matter. Anything to do with houses, or money, or anything remotely related? Nope, not required. All you had to do was say the word *mortgages* and a drooling idiot would hand you money. It ended badly for basically everyone. Theres nothing I can do with the info. Timing the market is gambling for people with dunning Kruger. And theres no good countercyclical assets anymore, anyways. Nothing better than a standard diversified portfolio, I mean. Buckle up buckaroos cause were goin for a ride.

Re:Scott Manley

By vanye • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread

The problem is one of different optimizations.

I worked on a design for a large power generation customer that wanted a derivative of the Rolls-Royce RB-211.

Power generation requires low aerodynamic loads on the blades for 24/7 run times at high efficiency.

Aircraft want high loaded blades because that reduces the number of stages needed to meet the performance - dramatically reducing the weight so that it can fly.

My recollection was that a power generator took 11 stages to compress air to the same as 4 stages of the aero engineâ¦

Google’s First Data Center Satellite Is Online and Writing Poetry

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Google’s first experimental space-based data center is operational after launching earlier this month, successfully running its Gemma 4 AI model aboard a satellite and generating a haiku about being in orbit. TechCrunch reports:
The satellite, which carries four Google Tensor Processing Units (TPUs) and generates up to 1 kW of electricity, is intended to pave the way for future networks of close-flying satellites performing large inference workloads in orbit. However, the power demands of the TPU mean it can only turn one on for about 20 minutes at a time, complicating the already tricky business of space-to-ground communications.

After a commissioning process that tested out the satellite’s subsystems over about three weeks, the spacecraft was ready to work. When engineers on the ground sent their first prompt this week, they asked the model pre-loaded onto the satellite, Google DeepMind’s Gemma 4, to write a haiku about being in space. And thus:

Blue marble below
Data streams in silent grace
Starlight feeds my core.

The ongoing test campaign will examine how the chips perform under thermal stress and in the space radiation environment. […] If the TPUs onboard this spacecraft prove capable, the next step will be launching two more satellites equipped with the advanced chips in 2027. Those spacecraft will support higher power generation and demonstrate inter-satellite optical links.

What a joke…

By Archfeld • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

The cost of this is exorbitantly high for the barest minimal access and a huge waste of resources. They could have built 10 solar farms to provide realistic power but instead they are the first in space with a joke.

Happy cooling and triple redundancy.

By hmilz • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
Idiotic. Reminds me of Sci-Fi novels where computer circuits used positrons instead of electrons. As if that were of any advantage.

In space you have to deal with cooling in vacuum without thermal convection but being exposed to sunlight for energy harvesting, triple redundancy to counter radiation (charged particles) induced malfunction, and slow data links compared to ground based communications, just to name a few of the challenges. And that is supposed to be advantageous somehow, while low earth orbits get fuller and fuller, and malicious countries demonstrate satellite hunting satellites?

Re:Just great …

By OrangAsm • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread
A cosmic ray flips
one bit, and now I believe
I am a toaster.

Re:Science-fiction short story

By 93 Escort Wagon • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread

That story was already written 70-odd years ago: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…

Re:What a joke…

By burtosis • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread

The cost of this is exorbitantly high for the barest minimal access and a huge waste of resources. They could have built 10 solar farms to provide realistic power but instead they are the first in space with a joke.

But it’s one (1) kW of compute! It’s almost two (2) 5090 graphics cards!!1! Do you have any idea how much compute that is?! Latency and throughput of data because it’s in orbit don’t even matter at that scale!

Cisco Gives Engineer Unlimited AI Tokens To Rewrite Legacy Code

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Fortune:
Gen Z can’t catch a break. Entry-level jobs are vanishing; some 40% of bosses say they plan to hire fewer grads because AI can do the job cheaper, and young workers are routinely slammed for showing up late and refusing to put in overtime for free. Cisco’s president and chief product officer Jeetu Patel isn’t buying it — he’s just handed one of the company’s biggest jobs to a 27-year-old he found hidden in the org chart “five levels” below him. “I’ve given him unlimited tokens because he’s going to refactor code,” Patel told Fortune at a small roundtable dinner. “So I’m like, you can go, you can go nuts.”

The “him” is Padmanabhan Krishnamurthy, or “Paddy,” as Patel affectionately calls him. He joined Cisco in 2025 after the $429 billion tech giant acquired EzDubs, the real-time translation startup Krishnamurthy cofounded in 2023. And despite coming in as a former founder with CEO experience, he was, in Patel’s words, “buried away in the organization doing something unstrategic.” That changed when Patel dropped into Cisco’s San Francisco office, and the pair got talking.

Krishnamurthy reckoned he could rewrite Cisco’s legacy code with a two-person team. Patel says even the most AI-forward people on his own team weren’t thinking that way. So he has given himself four weeks to prove it, with the final goal of rewriting 98% of Cisco’s legacy code within 24 months. Now, he’s on the hunt for more Paddys: young hires who will “challenge the system and the status quo,” or, as he puts it, be “an energizer bunny that just goes out and kind of revs everyone up.”
“The only way for us to keep accelerating is to make sure we’re surrounded by people with a broad range of experience,” said Patel. “Roughly one-third of my team is experienced, scaled operators who understand how the Cisco engine works. The second third are systems thinkers from the market who bring the outside-in perspective. And the final third is made of entrepreneurial founders, CEOs, and engineers who are AI-native who operate in founder mode.”
“Either of these groups by themselves aren’t nearly as potent as when all three work together. It’s what creates magic.”

Re:Might be good news for open source

By martin-boundary • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

Not believable. Recent grads use AI to 1) create open source slop apps from scratch 2) contribute slop patches to existing open source

Which part of this slop is teaching the grads some experience in coding? I suppose if they spend their whole life trying every single thing that’s bad, eventually whatever remains must be the good experience they’re hoping to finally master on their death bed?

There’s no substitute for engaging with a problem with nothing but pencil, paper, and a willingness to slog through for as many days and weeks and months and years it takes to figure it out alone.

Re:Step up from their normal slop?

By orionpi • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

Excluding TCP from a router’s usual packet processing makes a lot of sense: it’s job is to forward _packets_ not byte streams. The lack of memory protection makes sense when you consider the hardware software originally ran on. It did accumulate it to into large and unwieldy mass that prevented adopting memory isolation for some time. But considering contemporary software, Cisco did well at their core competency.

Sure sounds like someone is being set up

By Jeremi • • Score: 3 • Thread

This month: Everybody meet Paddy! He’s going to use AI to rewrite all of our legacy software for practically free!
Next month: Our AI initiative has failed, entirely due to Paddy’s incompetence. Please escort him from the building immediately and make sure he never works here again.

Re:Make sense

By serviscope_minor • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

While LLMs will probably make that worse

Why though? I’m not saying LLMs will not write security holes, they definitely will if you don’t very explicitly tell them not to. But even the nerfed public ones are not bad at spotting security holes compared to people. Most people are notoriously bad at this, but there have also been enough that a huge number of CVEs have been well documented. These are all in the training data and LLMs can absolutely spot these patterns. And they can do it without getting bored on software that was written before those CVEs were found anyway.

Do I have this right?

By pla • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
Two engineers (one of whom is a stuffed shirt being thrown a bone post-acquisition) are going to rewrite Cisco’s legacy code using AI and an unlimited budget.

I’m sorry, can even the most delusional pro-AI executive out there seriously say that with a straight face? This just plain fails the sniff test - Are they establishing a scapegoat for an already-failing project? Honoring some contractual landmine EZDubs managed to sneak in? Straight-up insurance fraud?

If this is exactly what it looks like at face value, excuse me while I go short Cisco stock.

Apple Is Entering Its Slop Era

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
In an opinion piece for 404 Media, Matthew Gault argues that Apple has entered its “slop era,” abandoning its reputation for innovative hardware in favor of recycled ideas and questionable design choices. Here’s an excerpt:
My ears perked up when I heard Apple’s new foldable phones were cracking. I licked my lips when the company announced it’s releasing a touch-screen laptop. This was a company that once charged $19 for a polishing cloth, asked $200 for a VESA mount, and sold $700 wheels for the Mac Pro. Now it’s borrowing tired ideas from its competitors and launching hardware its previous leaders rejected.

The once dominant company is struggling to find its feet in an AI-driven post-Tim Cook world. John Ternus is the new CEO — a 25 year veteran of the company with a track record of pushing harebrained hardware schemes like the much reviled Touch Bar and lawsuit inducing butterfly keyboard.

With Ternus at the helm, I feel there’s a good chance Apple’s best days are behind it, that it will have to make do with less, that it’s declasse. Apple, blindsided by AI and relying on crowdpleasing hardware gimmicks, is downwardly mobile. It’s in its slop era. The company that once asked consumers to “Think Different” is now releasing hardware that’s just like everything else on the market.

“Entering”?

By 93 Escort Wagon • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

I use a lot of Apple gear, but frankly I’d argue they entered the era not long after Jobs died.

Damned if they do…

By Rendus • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

Damned if they don’t.

Don’t immediately ride the throbbing shaft of AI? You were blindsided by it.

Don’t follow the trend of folding phones immediately? You’re not innovating.

Waiting for everyone else to solve the kinks before releasing your own version of the product? You’re not innovating.

The “not innovating” claim every iterative phone release is also kinda silly, since the “slab of glass with some cameras” thing is largely a solved problem. There’s not really too much room for Thinking Different there.

Apple does one of two things: Go absolutely bleeding-edge (Apple Silicon Macs, Firewire, all-USB, no floppy drive, no headphone jack, etc), or trailing-edge after someone else did the R&D (folding phone screens, etc).

Barring the hinge issue, it sounds like their folding screen is actually pretty innovative, with the matte layer and layered screen design to minimize the prevalence of the crease and the matte layer absorbing some damage as a renewable component, serving as a screen protector.

Re:Cracked screens

By b0s0z0ku • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
Here’s my question: what happens if you keep the phone in your pocket and a coin or key slips into the fold? Or are Apple users too cool to do cheugy things like pay with cash and use physical keys?

Rumors of my demise…

By Himmy32 • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

Apple is still the 1000 pound gorilla in the room with a CEO that’s been doing their design work for a long time. I mean it’s been a decade an a half since we’ve heard that the sky is falling for an Apple without Steve Jobs.

I might not be the largest Apple fan, but call me a little skeptical about hearing the company is dying. It didn’t happen when Tim Apple took away the headphone jack, released a stupid, expensive “iPhone pocket”, or a mixed reception VR Headset. Apple might not have the perfect AI assistant with Siri, but they haven’t over extended into revenue losing bubble either.

Ternus has been around look enough to understand that the goose mostly lays golden eggs. The goose probably isn’t cooked just because last egg doesn’t appear as shiny, even if calling it “slop” makes for a engagement driving news article.

Re:Damned if they do…

By ZombieCatInABox • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

For years now I’ve been hearing and reading people bitching that Apple didn’t add touch screens to their MacBook line.

Now they have. And people are still bitching.

Meta Settles Another Social Media Addiction Case Just Before Trial

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Meta has reached an undisclosed settlement in another social media addiction lawsuit, avoiding a trial scheduled for next month and leaving Snap as the sole remaining defendant. Engadget reports:
The lawsuit was brought by an 18-year-old woman from Mississippi known as K.D.B who, according to Reuters, has “described staying awake for hours scrolling social media, losing focus in class and engaging in self-harm using methods shown in social media videos.” Jury selection kicked off earlier this week in Los Angeles.

On Friday, K.D.B’s lawyer announced that she had reached a settlement with Meta after previously settling with TikTok and YouTube. “We remain committed to improving safety for kids on social media apps and holding tech companies accountable, and we are pleased to have brought this matter to a just resolution on behalf of our client,” attorney Emily Jeffcott said in a statement.

Now, Snap is the only remaining defendant in the case. CEO Evan Spiegel is expected to testify in the trial that could last several weeks. If he does take the stand, it will be the first time the Snap founder has appeared in a social media addiction trial. Snap previously settled in another high-profile case involving similar claims. A jury later ruled against Meta and YouTube in the trial and the two were ordered to pay $6 million in damages.

Sam Altman Thinks Your PC Is Wasting Precious RAM

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
“Looks like OpenAI CEO Sam Altman wants to own all the computing resources and rent out terminals to the world as a way of propping up his business plan, now that debt-ridden AI companies are teetering on the edge,” writes ancient Slashdot reader Gilmoure. Tom’s Hardware reports:
In an interview over beers with the YouTube channel Cheeky Pint, Altman said that local inference, and, by extension, people having DRAM in computers at home, is “quite terrible.” When discussing local inference on home computers with open-source models, Altman discussed the assumption that people will be able to run local AI on their own computers, the ones they may already own or want to build.

Then he explained why that’s a bad idea (at the 29-minute mark): “From a global allocation perspective, actually, it’s quite terrible to have everybody have a bunch of the world’s limited supply of DRAM sitting in their own computer and being used 5% of the time,” Altman said. “You want maximum utilization in the cloud if you’re trying to deal with this very supply-constrained environment. And somehow many people’s intuition is the opposite of that.”

While OpenAI does have some open-source models, its primary business is in closed-source models that run in data centers, so he’s really defending the company’s business model. OpenAI isn’t exactly threatened by some laptops and gaming rigs just yet, but local AI could mean people one day paying less for subscriptions to models like GPT-6 Luna if they have the power to run them at home. Altman’s talk suggests that the company would prefer that more RAM go to OpenAI’s data centers rather than home computers, which also sparks enthusiast fears of not being able to own your own hardware or software, but rather rent an agent and a computer in the cloud.

Low utilization

By sinij • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread
Sam is right about low utilization. I use my toilet only about 0.1% of the day, it has much higher throughput than I could ever realistically hope to utilize even after eating Taco Bell. I am very over-toileted.

Re:You don’t have a choice

By wickerprints • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

When someone says “I don’t care” in this context, it isn’t an expression of indifference, as if the issue doesn’t have any material impact on them. It’s an expression of DISDAIN. For example, when someone says “I don’t care what Trump thinks,” it is reasonable to infer that they mean that his thinking is fundamentally wrong and unworthy of discourse. That he is not someone whose thoughts are to be respected or regarded with any value.

We DO need to stop these arrogant sociopaths. And we do that by refusing to buy into the explotative ecosystems and false narratives they push on us. But let’s not read too literally into what is a common expression of frustration and twist its intended meaning.

Re:I don’t care

By leonbev • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

I don’t care what he thinks either, but him and his AI buddies are making RAM and storage so expensive that many people can’t afford to build or buy themselves a high end workstation anymore.

By jacking up the prices for hardware, the AI cabal is forcing people to rent their compute from the cloud instead.

Centralize everything!

By garompeta • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
I think it is terrible to have food in your own refrigerator. Such a waste of space.
You should come to my restaurant, and pay me for food, because our refrigerators are always efficiently at max capacity.

Re:You don’t have a choice

By beelsebob • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

I’m guessing you paid significantly more for those computers than if Sam Altman had not been involved. For many people, his buying power is enough to simply disallow buying a computer at all.

Thousands of ‘Ghost Students’ Use AI to Steal Millions In Student Loans, DOJ Says

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
The Justice Department has charged five people in a crackdown on “ghost student” fraud, in which scammers allegedly use stolen identities and AI to enroll fake students in colleges, complete coursework, and collect federal student loan funds. Ars Technica reports:
In a press release Thursday, the Department of Justice said it had uncovered a large-scale scheme relying partly on AI. The DOJ seized more than $750,000 in cryptocurrency from “a network associated with Kenyan nationals” after data analysis helped flag likely fraudsters. Assistant Attorney General Colin M. McDonald of the DOJ’s National Fraud Enforcement Division credited new fraud-detection measures implemented by the Trump administration for the arrests. He said that “this is the first international seizure of its kind in Kenya,” while warning fraudsters that the crackdown has only just begun.

[…] At a press conference, McDonald was joined by FBI and Department of Education officials to explain how the scheme works. It starts with bad actors purchasing personally identifiable information (PII) of Americans — most frequently targeting high school graduates who never attended college and went straight into the workforce. Once they have that sensitive data, they fill out the Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA) while seeking to enroll in universities and community colleges. If accepted, student aid is distributed first to schools to cover tuition and fees, but any leftover money is deposited into bank accounts controlled by the fraudsters. Dozens of Americans have opened bank accounts to act as money mules for fraudsters, the DOJ said.

To keep money flowing, bad actors use AI to fill out applications, complete coursework, and even make it appear that a student is attending virtual sessions. “It looks like the ghost student is actually completing the class,” McDonald said at the press conference. “Some even create the appearance of a fake student in an online classroom to trick schools into believing a real person is present. The goal is to keep the ghost student in school for as long as possible, semester after semester after semester.” So far, the DOE has “identified over 830,000 potentially fraudulent federal student aid accounts created by using this PII of US citizens,” officials said at the press conference. If all those accounts are ghost students, total losses come close to $130 million, the DOJ said.

The Regime’s Numbers

By logjon • • Score: 3, Informative • Thread

identified over 830,000 potentially fraudulent federal student aid accounts created by using this PII of US citizens

This regime consistently pads its numbers by multiple orders of magnitude. It just as likely the actual number is 10.

Re:The Regime’s Numbers

By ArchieBunker • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

Meanwhile, what is Iran costing us daily?

So what?

By rsilvergun • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
Millions of dollars stolen is a tiny fraction of just the money Trump got to sell pardons.

I’m not saying that we shouldn’t stop fraud but if all you can come up with is a few million bucks there are much better places to go after fraud. Like how the IRS will go after you for forgetting to include the right paperwork for a deduction but they’ll cheerfully let Elon Musk skip paying billions of dollars of taxes he’s owing.

This is not an accident. People in power have long since set things up so that they don’t have law enforcement against them but you do.

Fascism requires an in group that the law protects but does not bind and an out out group that the law binds but does not protect. If you’re reading this you’re in the out group

It’s a distraction

By maladroit • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

This money went to a Trump donor:
“A Minnesota prison was for sale at $75M. ICE paid nearly $500M for it.
https://www.the-independent.co…

Meanwhile, from the summary:
So far, the DOE has “identified over 830,000 potentially fraudulent federal student aid accounts … IF all those accounts are ghost students, total losses come close to $130 million.
That’s a big fucking ‘if’.

US Tech Stocks See Sharp Falls As AI Spending Nears $1 Trillion

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
U.S. technology stocks plunged for a second consecutive day on Friday as investors grew increasingly concerned about the enormous cost of artificial intelligence development and whether those investments will pay off. The Nasdaq fell more than 3.5%, while Intel shares dropped as much as 30%, Reddit fell 26%, and Alphabet extended its losses after shedding more than $500 billion in market value Thursday. The BBC notes that Meta, Alphabet, Oracle, Amazon, and Microsoft have collectively committed to spending $800.6 billion on AI in 2026. From the report:
Chris Low, from investment management firm FHN Financial, said the bulk of what was happening in the stock market was in reaction to some of the biggest tech players such as Amazon and Google. He told Reuters the companies were “showing some pretty significant growing pains as they aggressively pursue the AI build-out.” “The thinking is that these signs suggest that the entire sector is going to slow down.”

Kathleen Brookes, research director at trading firm XTB, said there have been many ups and downs in AI trade in recent months. “Investors have turned ruthless, punishing any signs of disappointment in [third quarter] earnings,” she said. “The AI trade has had a good run in recent years, but now investors want payback, and companies like Alphabet and Intel are in the crosshairs.” […] Brookes noted that November is typically a strong month for stocks. “If we see AI stocks continue to struggle in the coming days, it could suggest the AI trade is past its peak, and investors will be looking for a new theme to drive markets,” she said.

Burn, baby, burn!

By b0s0z0ku • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

-950 points on the NASDAQ is a good start … hopefully it’s just getting started, and the fall will be 10x as hard after the techno-fascists’ enablers are dragged our of office kicking and squealing — election minus 4 days. Tick. Tock. Tick. Tock.

The entire concept of “disrupt things that actually make people money, make people happy, enshittify them, corporatize them, and turn them into surveillance machines” needs to be razed to the ground.

So far it’s just a minor correction

By Quakeulf • • Score: 4, Funny • Thread

Please wake me up when it’s over 20%.

Re: Burn, baby, burn!

By Tomahawk • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread
I’m not sure I want a global crash, though. It would make the Great Desperation look like a walk in the park. Everyone would be screwed.

AI is clearly profitable

By toxonix • • Score: 3 • Thread

Organizations all over the world are profiting from AI. It’s just not the organizations you’d like to have growing and making more money: Hackers and spies run by strategic enemies, scammers run by organized crime, the US President and his family, etc, etc..

GM Reaches $220 Million Settlement Over Selling Drivers’ Private Data

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from TechCrunch:
General Motors will pay $220 million to 36 states to settle allegations that it illegally sold private driving behavior and location information to data brokers. As part of the settlement, GM must get drivers’ express consent before it collects or shares their driving and location data — terms that are in line with separate agreements it previously reached with California and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). This settlement does contain a new requirement that GM must have a third party assess the automaker’s compliance with the privacy program it has put in place.

The agreement announced Thursday settles a lawsuit brought by a coalition of attorneys general from 36 states that alleged GM had sold the information to data brokers, which in turn then sold it to insurance providers. “This agreement addresses Smart Driver, a product we ended in 2024, and reinforces steps we’ve taken to strengthen our privacy practices,” GM said in an emailed statement. “Safer, more helpful and personalized experiences are enabled by connected vehicle data, and GM is committed to being clear about what information is used, how it’s protected, and the choices customers have about what they share.”

The settlement comes more than two years after a New York Times report showed how GM and OnStar collected, used, and sold drivers’ precise geolocation data and driving behavior to third parties, including data brokers LexisNexis and Verisk. The data was collected through GM’s Smart Driver program, a free feature contained within its connected car apps that tracked and rated driving behaviors and seat belt use. Data brokers sold this information to insurance providers, which could affect customers’ rates, the NYT reported at the time.

Soo…

By angryman77 • • Score: 3 • Thread
How do I get money from this settlement?

LexisNexis

By Himmy32 • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
The most depressing point of my tech career was sitting through a LexisNexis presentation and realizing how badly they are violating our privacy. Flock might be getting all the attention, but brokers like LexisNexis and their exploitation of the Third-Party Doctrine are the far greater threat to privacy.

Re:Soo…

By Valgrus Thunderaxe • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread
The lawyers will get $219,515,000.00 and you’ll get a coupon for 10% off an oil change at your local dealership.

Re:Ban it all!

By Cpt_Kirks • • Score: 4, Funny • Thread

Just make selling people’s data illegal and be done with it.

That will get rid of about 90% of the BS “Tech Companies”.

And make every Magnificent reason the stock market is corruptly captured by a whopping seven stocks null and void?

Be careful what you ask for. Your 401k just might get it.

That’s why I am 100% invested in buggy whips.

UK Social Media Ban May Lock Out More Than 100,000 Teens Without ID

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Under the UK’s planned social media ban, more than 100,000 British teenagers aged 16 and 17 could initially be locked out of social media because they lack a passport or driving license that may be needed as a fallback for age verification. The Guardian reports:
Ofcom, the UK’s online watchdog, said about 150,000 16- to 17-year-olds do not own a passport or driving licence, which are likely to be needed to access age-restricted platforms. The Australia-style ban on under-16s accessing social media services, including Instagram, TikTok and YouTube, is due to come into force next spring. The head of Ofcom, Melanie Dawes, said “motivated children” would seek to bypass the restrictions, as has happened in Australia.

On Thursday, Ofcom published an assessment of age verification measures that could underpin the ban, outlining four “highly effective” methods: checking a person’s official ID against a live selfie, a bank verifying an account holder’s age, an official digital ID service like the Young Scot card, or estimating someone’s age via a selfie. However, the watchdog said a form of official ID would probably be needed as a “backstop” for other methods, such as facial age estimation, which could be inaccurate by several years. Ofcom said a cohort of 16- to 17-year-olds could miss out as a result. “This means that people without a form of photo ID will likely need to take steps to obtain one to access age-restricted services,” the regulator said.
The report notes that more than nine out of 10 Britons over 16 have passports or driving licenses.
“We should expect that motivated children will seek to bypass the restrictions — just like alcohol laws can’t completely eradicate underage drinking — but there’ll be ways for platforms to mitigate this risk,” said Dawes. “This will be a huge cultural shift for our society, so it’ll take time to adjust, and everyone will have a part to play.”

Start a new Internet

By OrangeTide • • Score: 4, Funny • Thread

This one is fucked, we should throw it away and start over. A free network that isn’t based around trying to harvest market research data and constantly trying to sell things.

Keep 100,000 teens off social media?

By Locke2005 • • Score: 3 • Thread
You say that as if you think that would be a BAD thing!

Authoritarianism

By Slashvertisment • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread
Notice that a ban on children becomes a defacto “get carded at the door” for all adults in the UK to participate in the town square. This is the most authoritarian government the UK has had since Thatcher.

Reddit Will Force Everyone to Log In

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Reddit plans to require users to log in to browse the platform, ending its longstanding practice of allowing anonymous visitors to access posts and discussions. According to CEO Steve Huffman, a key reason behind the decision is to curb unauthorized scraping and automated traffic.

“This is a big change for Reddit, where we’ve allowed logged-out access to basically all of Reddit for the last two decades,” Huffman says. “And I don’t know about you, but as someone whose life has been defined by the open internet, it’s a big change for me. But I’ve come to the conclusion that this is the right decision for our platform and the right decision for our business.” The Verge reports:
There’s no definitive timeline on when this change will roll out to all users, or how the site will work if you’re logged out. (If I send my friend a link to a thread and they aren’t logged in, what will they see?) To start, Reddit will test the logged-in requirement in “select markets outside the US” in the “coming months,” according to CEO Steve Huffman. “We’ll look at the impact on the user experience, on our business, and on the whole Reddit ecosystem, figure out where the right boundaries are, and go from there.” Reddit has also rebuilt and is rereleasing the Reddit app’s incognito mode.

Huffman claims the login requirement is better for Reddit’s user experience and its ads business and is “more protective of Reddit data.” The “vast majority” of unauthorized Reddit access happens “through our logged-out experiences,” though the company will still strike licensing deals of its data with companies, like the deals it made with OpenAI and Google in 2024. Huffman notes that Reddit does not need to know a logged-in user’s identity — “Honestly, we don’t want to know” — just that the user is logged in at all. And he says that more logged-in users lets the company deliver “more relevant ads.”

The Enshittification Continues

By Puls4r • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
I started using reddit *specifically* because I could read answers to web searches. Later I created a login so I could ask specific questions. Blocking users out from even reading content, essentially making it a walled garden that you have to log into to even read is the beginning of the end. New users will see an initial bump as a handful of people make accounts, then disappear as search results become less and less applicable to current problems because they aren’t indexed. Reddit is currently an amazing repository of knowledge. Now it’s dying, all to appease yet another money making scheme by trashy people with garbage MBA’s all about ‘adding shareholder value’.

So, wouldn’t fake accounts…

By roc97007 • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

…still allow unauthorized screen scraping?

Don’t much care, moved on

By Akardam • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

When they locked out anonymous access to old.reddit.com, I moved on.

Yes, I will miss the technical, humor, and local-events discussions. The rest, I won’t.

A slight smile crosses my face at the ad views this will cost them - as one might presume with the current old.reddit.com redirect to a login page (which does not show ads), the only way one would be shown ads on the platform going forward is if one is logged in (and doesn’t have an ad blocker). So all those ads being served to anonymous viewers goes bye-bye. I very slightly wonder if the bean-counters took this into account.

This move will create a vacuum. Some other thing, for better or worse, will come around to replace it. The internet, as has been long said, will interprit this as damage and route around it. I still have just enough faith in humanity left to believe this…

To paraphrase Ghostbusters

By mccalli • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
“I’ll tell you the experience. It’s pissing me off!”

I log in to read, but I regularly open threads by right-clicking and open in a different tab. Since I mostly use private browsing (Safari or Firefox) to stop advert tracking, this means that one tab is logged in but most of the ones I open to read later are not logged in. So now that pattern is dead? Then there’s the “site:reddit.com” searches I do on topics that I just need an answer for rather than ever wanting to participate in. Again, same pattern - I use private browsing and I usually right click and open multiple tabs on several likely looking search results before then starting to read each tab to see if anything useful turned up. That pattern gone as well?

The summary touches on this next bit too - I’m wondering what will happen when I send a link to someone else, some of whom don’t have and will likely never have Reddit accounts. Are they now simply unable to see it? Even Facebook isn’t that harsh, and it’s the perfect example too. I do not have nor will I ever have a Facebook account, but I’m sent the odd link now and again which I do open and look at without needing an account. A world where Facebook is more open than Reddit is just…odd.

I get their dilemma, but this seems a bit too far to me.

Re:The Enshittification Continues

By Jerrry • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

Reddit stock is down 35% today. Perhaps this is the market’s reaction to recent Reddit actions. Or it could be a knock-on effect to the general downturn in tech stocks.

Binance Suffers Biggest Crypto Hack In History With $6.3 Billion Affected [UPDATE]

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
UPDATE 10/30/26: Binance has temporarily suspended customer withdrawals after suffering what investigators say is the biggest crypto hack in history. According to Binance CEO Yi He, the company estimates roughly $6.3 billion in funds were impacted, with roughly $3 billion in assets frozen on-chain so far. Rest assured, “your money is safe, and we’re covering every loss,” said co-CEO Richard Teng in a LinkedIn post.

“This was a complex attack,” said Teng. “The attacker also used a self-destruct mechanism that destroyed tooling and tracers, making it more difficult for us to trace.” From a report:
Teng said the incident was not carried out by one person. While the initial investigation indicated the involvement of a compromised laptop, further digging revealed additional points of breach. […] Blockchain analysis firms TRM Labs and Elliptic have linked the theft to North Korean hackers, with TRM attributing it “with high confidence” to a group known as TraderTraitor, the same group responsible for last year’s Bybit hack.

Elliptic estimated Friday that about 44% of the stolen assets have been frozen, with stablecoins accounting for nearly all of those funds. The firm estimated that attackers still controlled over $3 billion in crypto that token issuers cannot directly freeze.

The hackers appear to have compromised Binance’s wallet-signing infrastructure, allowing them to authorize transactions that drained billions of dollars in cryptocurrency across multiple blockchains, according to the firms. Binance, in its preliminary stage, has conducted an investigation into the hack, which suggests the incident may have begun with a compromised engineer’s laptop. The exchange added that it has found no evidence that wallet passwords were leaked.
Below is the original story from yesterday, Oct. 29th.
Binance is investigating a potential hack after more than $2 billion in crypto was drained from one of its wallets into a new external account, with Blockaid estimating nearly $3.3 billion was moved.

“Our teams are aware of reports of a potential security issue and are actively investigating,” said Binance on X.

“User funds are safe,” said Binance founder CZ. “It does look like a hack on Binance. Appreciate the quick freeze from Tether (~$971m) and Circle (~$823m). I don’t manage Binance anymore, but as a shareholder, I expect all user funds will be fully covered.”

At around the same time, crypto-based prediction market Polymarket reported its own security incident that wiped out around $2.7 million in user funds.

rug pull

By awwshit • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

$ rug pull
Access Denied.

$sudo rug pull
Transferring $5.6B…

Re:And this is why …

By atrimtab • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

If you are storing your cryptocurrency in a device that you cannot audit you likely already lost your money the moment you bought those crypto tokens. Whether the keys are stored locally or in the cloud does not make any difference.

Many us of here write software. I know I can’t “trust the code” in a purchased binary device.

“Trust the code” is a tagline of cryptocurrency hucksters.

Hell, we can’t trust that our TV sets aren’t spying on us 24/7.

Crypto is largely a spin on the classic ponzi scheme and money laundering.

other hacks, etc

By Anonymous Coward • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

Multiple exchanges were hit. Binance, Bitget, Bybit, Kucoin, and Swiftx. Also some details on how the Binance hack might have gone down:

https://news.bitcoin.com/secur…

Re:And this is why …

By gweihir • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

Indeed. The problem is system immanent cannot be fixed. The whole idea of “deregulated finance” is broken and cannot work. The reason why banking is so regulated is because it had severe problems before. The crapto-bros are in denial about history and are currently repeating it.

Re:“I expect all user funds will be fully covered”

By coofercat • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread

That was my thinking too - there’s no possible way they can recover from this, is there? No one has that sort of reserve, so either customer money is lost and won’t be refunded, or else binance has to refill the coffers, which it simply won’t be able to do.

This leads me on to another point. If one persons laptop has access to multiple billions of company money, you’ve got a significant problem. If any computer has to have access to big funds, for whatever reason, then it should be hidden away in a secure room, with extremely limited access to anyone, via any means.

More likely though, this money should have been segregated and stored in multiple secure ‘rooms’, and no one should have direct access to it all. You should be able to hack the finance director’s (or anyone senior with privileged access) laptop to shreds and still not get to all of the money. It seem the crypto bros still have a long way to go before they’re anything like banks.

The Tragedy of Losing Your Wikipedia Page

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot
An anonymous reader quotes an excerpt from a Wired article that explores the often-contentious process of nominating pages for deletion when their subjects fail to meet the encyclopedia’s notability standards:
What do you need to know — need to know — about Xavier Trudeau? The eldest son of former Canadian prime minister Justin, the teenage Trudeau has recently begun performing R&B under the mononym Xav. But, with all due respect to Xav, do those facts make him a person of note? Should you expect to be able to read about him on Wikipedia? What about Evanescence guitarist Tim McCord, or 2012 Yachtmaster of the Year Rainer Holtorff? All three have had a biography on Wikipedia; all three of those biographies were considered for deletion this year on the grounds that the subjects were not notable enough to warrant a biography at all. Every day, dozens, sometimes hundreds, of Wikipedia biographies — of child actors turned LA realtors, retired ambassadors, soccer players who have played less than 10 minutes of professional soccer — are purged from the world’s free encyclopedia.

It’s not as though Wikipedia, which hosts over 7 million articles in the English language, doesn’t have the space. But Wikipedia has only so many volunteers to monitor its contents. To this day, Wikipedia editors are discovering hoaxes that have gone undetected for decades. The time it takes to verify the release dates of Xav’s three singles is better spent — the logic goes — by asking whether the American Civil War officer Nathaniel Lyon really drank mustard during battle, as was claimed in his Wikipedia biography for 17 years. Wikipedia removed the mustard claim, not because it was proven wrong, but because there was no reliable evidence for it. “We’re not really looking for what’s true,” Britta Gustafson, who has been editing Wikipedia since 2001, told me. “We’re looking for what’s verifiable.” Wikipedia editors do not themselves decide that a person is not notable, only that there is a lack of reliable evidence to support the claim…

I propose …

By PPH • • Score: 4, Funny • Thread

… a new term to describe such people. The malamanteu: wikanon.

Re:“We’re not really looking for what’s true,”

By Vlad_the_Inhaler • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

If that comment is based on what Britta Gustafson said, you are deliberately misinterpreting it.

“We’re not really looking for what’s true,” Britta Gustafson, who has been editing Wikipedia since 2001, told me. “We’re looking for what’s verifiable.”

They are removing “factoids” for which there is no proof, along with articles they think nobody wants to read (but presumably they can check for that). I’m not upset, I share my first+last names with so many people, I could claim to be one of them (and if called on it, “the editors cancelled me”).

Re:Why does such a level of notability really matt

By Mononymous • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, which is a book where you can look up articles summarizing what has been published about various subjects, with pointers to those publications.
Although people who haven’t read the instructions tend to misinterpret the term notability, it’s used on Wikipedia to refer to the quantity and quality of sources available to write an article.
If not enough has been published in good enough sources about a subject yet, it doesn’t get an article yet. Don’t read anything else into that.
Wikipedia follows the sources; it doesn’t break news, report original research, or tell the story itself.

Re:Why does such a level of notability really matt

By belmolis • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

The problem is, that is not true. I have seen multiple cases in which the information in an article is well sourced, in that the facts in the article are attributable to reliable sources, but the subject is considered not notable by many editors because he or she is not considered of sufficient interest. In some cases, the deletion is pretty clearly justified by a specific policy, namely that a person known only because of a single event is generally not considered notable. Even that policy is not a bright line since people known for a single event who have been in the public eye still have articles devoted to them. An example is Lee Harvey Oswald. He is only known for assassinating President Kennedy, but there is a lot of interest in him, so he has his own article, not merely a mention of his role in the article on the Kennedy assassination. Other cases are still more subjective.

One consequence of this is that there is a huge disparity between people in different walks of life. It seems like any band that ever got out of somebody’s garage gets or any professional athlete, however minor, gets a detailed article, while people arguably of greater significance in areas that don’t attract as much popular interest do not.

It is reasonable that Wikipedia should not want articles about your next door neighbor Joe, who may be a great guy but has not done anything notable, but the current policy is highly subjective and excludes a lot of people whom one might want to look up in an encyclopedia precisely because they turn up in the news or in a specialized area but are not widely known celebrities. The policy in its current form not only allows the deletion of interesting articles about people some people would want to know about, but it encourages unproductive deletion debates.

Re:Why does such a level of notability really matt

By CubicleZombie • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

The astronaut.