Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Google API Keys Remain Active After Deletion
  2. Major Streamers Must Pay 15% of Revenues To Canadian Content, CRTC Says
  3. NTSB Wants PDF Removed After It Exposed Final Cockpit Audio From UPS Crash
  4. Trump Mobile Exposed Customers’ Personal Data, Including Phone Numbers and Home Addresses
  5. Spotify, UMG To Let Fans Make Their Own Music With AI
  6. This Cannes Film Cost $500,000 to Make. $400,000 Was AI Compute Costs.
  7. Venmo Redesign Makes New Users’ Posts Friends-Only by Default
  8. Samsung Chip Workers To Get $340,000 Average Bonus In AI Boom
  9. A Bipartisan Amendment Would End Police License Plate Tracking Nationwide
  10. Steve Wozniak Tells Graduates They All Have ‘AI’: Actual Intelligence
  11. At Least 80% Responsibility For Ill Health In Old Age Down to Individual, Study Says
  12. AT&T Sues California In Bid To Stop Offering Traditional Phone Service
  13. Thousands of Zillow Listings In Chicago Have Vanished
  14. Vivaldi 8.0 Arrives With ‘Most Significant Design Overhaul’ In Browser’s History
  15. Trump Calls Off AI Executive Order Over Concern It Could Weaken US Tech Edge

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Google API Keys Remain Active After Deletion

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Aikido Security found that deleted Google API keys can continue authenticating for a median of about 16 minutes and as long as 23 minutes, despite Google Cloud’s UI claiming that once a key is deleted it can no longer make API requests. Dark Reading reports:
Joe Leon, researcher at Belgian startup Aikido Security, recently analyzed the revocation window — the time between a key’s deletion and its last successful authentication — for the cloud giant’s API keys. In a blog post published today, Leon said Google Cloud Platform (GCP) customers expect API access to end immediately after the key is deleted, but this is not the case. In a series of tests, Leon found that the median revocation window was around 16 minutes, while the longest window was up to 23 minutes, “an incredibly long time” for API keys to continue authenticating successfully, he said.

And these windows have serious repercussions for organizations. “An attacker holding your deleted key can keep sending requests until one reaches a server that has not caught up. If Gemini is enabled on the project, they can dump files you have uploaded and exfiltrate cached conversations,” Leon said. “The GCP console will not show the key, and it will not tell you the key is still working. You are trusting Google’s infrastructure to eventually catch up.”

[…] Leon tells Dark Reading the revocation windows for Google’s API keys, as well as the unpredictable authentication success rates, complicate matters for incident response teams that are dealing with a potential breach. “This breaks the mental model IR teams have when responding to leaked credentials,” he says. “It’s assumed that when you click ‘Delete’ or ‘Revoke’ that the credential no longer works. Now IR teams need to remember that for GCP credentials, a window exists when that ‘Deleted’ credential still works for attackers.”

To that end, Aikido recommended that security teams and IR personnel use a 30-minute window for Google API key deletions. Additionally, organizations should monitor their API requests by credential through the “Enabled APIs and services” portion of the GCP console, and review API requests by credential. “If you see unexpected usage from that credential after deletion, someone could be actively exploiting it,” Leon wrote. Aikido reported the findings to Google, but the company closed the report as “won’t fix,” according to the blog post.

Major Streamers Must Pay 15% of Revenues To Canadian Content, CRTC Says

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Canada’s broadcast regulator says major streaming services such as Netflix must contribute 15% of their Canadian revenues to Canadian and Indigenous content. “That’s three times the five-per-cent initial contribution requirement the CRTC set out in 2024, which is being challenged in court by major streamers, including Apple and Amazon,” reports Global News. “Contribution requirements for traditional broadcasters, which currently pay between 30 and 45 percent, will be lowered to 25 percent.” From the report:
“The total contributions are expected to stabilize the funding at more than $2 billion in support of Canadian and Indigenous content, such as French-language content and news,” the regulator said in a press release. The CRTC made the decisions as part of its implementation of the Online Streaming Act, which the U.S. has identified as a trade irritant ahead of trade negotiations with Canada.

The CRTC also set out rules on how the money must be spent for both streamers and broadcasters, including contributions toward production funds and direct spending on Canadian content. Most of the streamers’ financial contributions can go toward content, though the CRTC is imposing rules on how that money must be spent for the largest streamers. For instance, streamers with Canadian revenues of more than $100 million annually must direct 30 percent of spending toward partnerships with Canadian broadcasters and independent producers. Large Canadian broadcasters will have to direct at least 15 percent of their contributions toward news.

The new financial contribution rules apply to streamers and broadcasters with at least $25 million in annual Canadian broadcasting revenues. The decision covers audiovisual programming, meaning it affects traditional TV broadcasters and online services that stream television content. The regulator also said Thursday online streamers will have to take steps to ensure Canadian and Indigenous content is available and visible to audiences. “This will make it easier for people to find this content on the platforms they use, while giving broadcasters flexibility in how they meet the new expectations,” the CRTC said in the release. Details of those requirements will be determined at a later time.

Major Streamers Raise Prices by 15%

By LondoMollari • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Canadians will end up paying their own taxes and streaming will become more expensive for all in Canada.

Re:Vancouver BC

By PPH • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Welcome to Netflix’s new streaming channel: Bob and Doug McKenzie , 24 hours per day.

NTSB Wants PDF Removed After It Exposed Final Cockpit Audio From UPS Crash

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
The NTSB temporarily closed public access to nearly all investigation dockets after people used a spectrogram image from a PDF in the UPS flight 2976 crash file to reconstruct approximate cockpit voice recorder audio and post it online. “We show our work and we’ve been doing this type of thing for years. Nobody was aware that you can recreate audio from a picture,” a spokesperson for the board said. “NTSB is looking to make sure there’s nothing else in the docket that could compromise anybody’s privacy… now that we understand the possibility of a digital recreation.” CNN reports:
Cockpit voice recordings, often referred to as the CVR, capture everything commercial pilots say and are valuable during NTSB investigations, but are almost never released out of respect for the victims and their families. UPS flight 2976 crashed on November 4, when an engine separated from the wing while it was taking off from Louisville, Kentucky. The three crew members onboard were killed along with 12 people on the ground. During a two-day investigative hearing this week, the board released a docket full of details about the crash. Besides thousands of pages of reports and video showing the engine separating, it included a transcript of the CVR and a PDF file showing an analysis of the spectrogram of the audio it recorded.

A spectrogram is a still image that is a visual representation of the audio, showing the ups and downs of the frequencies. Using that still image, members of the public were able to recreate the voices of the pilots in the moments before the plane crashed and post the results online. The clip, which included background noise and echoes, covered the last 30 seconds of the flight as the pilots struggled with the disabled aircraft as well as recordings of testing the NTSB did on another aircraft.

In a statement on Thursday, the board made clear it “does not release cockpit voice recordings” due to federal law and because of the highly sensitive nature of what they include, but it was “aware that advances in image recognition and computational methods have enabled individuals to reconstruct approximations of cockpit voice recorder audio from sound spectrum imagery.” Investigation dockets are made public for transparency, but this week, the board took the rare step of closing public access to all dockets, including the one for the UPS crash. […] The NTSB is urging platforms like X and Reddit to remove posts with the audio.

Re:Hmmmmm…

By Smidge204 • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Nothing.

There is a 30 year old law that prohibits releasing audio from aircraft black boxes. They accidentally “released” the audio by publishing a spectrograph, which is effectively a violation of the law.

So now they’re going through all their stuff making sure they aren’t accidentally releasing data they are legally prohibited from releasing.

No conspiracy needed.
=Smidge=

Trump Mobile Exposed Customers’ Personal Data, Including Phone Numbers and Home Addresses

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Trump Mobile confirmed that a third-party platform exposed customers’ personal data to the open internet. The data included names, email addresses, mailing addresses, phone numbers, and order IDs. TechCrunch reports:
Chris Walker, a spokesperson for the Trump-branded phone maker, told TechCrunch that the company is investigating the exposure and has not found evidence that content or financial information spilled online. The company said there was no breach of Trump Mobile’s network, systems, or infrastructure. Walker said that the exposure was linked to a third-party platform provider that supports “certain Trump Mobile operations.” He did not name the provider.

[…] On Wednesday, two YouTubers who ordered Trump Mobile’s phone said a researcher alerted them that their personal information was exposed online. The YouTubers Coffeezilla and penguinz0 said they tried to alert Trump Mobile of the exposure after the researcher also tried but to no avail. Walker said Trump Mobile is evaluating whether it needs to notify customers of the exposure of their personal data.
Further reading: Trump Phones Start Shipping - But Were There Really 600,000 Preorders?

How awful

By ArchieBunker • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Why would Obama do something like this?

Humiliation fetishists

By Anonymous Coward • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
At this point I have zero sympathy for any suckers roped into this, with the possible exception of journalists who bought want to document the predictable.

You’ve had a decade to learn that everything Piggy touches turns to shit, that he cares about other people in the same way I care about food on my plate, that the only constant is his greed and fuck you.

I was willing to believe some of the slower, oblivious or brainwashed folks were suckers for a while; I probably persisted in that for too long because that includes some family members.

But anyone still licking Piggy’s asshole in 2026 deserves every humiliation they get.

Re: Honestly

By gtall • Score: 4, Informative Thread

They won’t take notice. They cannot believe the incompetence because that would mean denying the last 5 (at least) years of their beliefs. And all their Bunko Buddies would disown them if they uttered a word against el Bunko. It is their reward system and they are quite happy with it.

Re: Stop contradicting yourself!

By RazorSharp • Score: 5, Informative Thread

There is no contradiction. Trump Mobile hired a cheap third party incapable of doing the work properly and failed to ensure that the work was adequate. That does not absolve them of blame, that places the blame squarely on Trump Mobile.

Re:When I was a kid…

By thegarbz • Score: 4, Funny Thread

When I was a kid, we called that a Phone Book, now it’s “Exposing Customer Data”? OK, whatever.

The phone book never identified that you made fucking stupid purchasing decisions. I’m happy to give people my phone number and my address, but I’d probably die of shame if anyone caught me with a Trump phone.

Spotify, UMG To Let Fans Make Their Own Music With AI

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Billboard:
Spotify and Universal Music Group (UMG) announced a licensing deal for recorded music and publishing rights, enabling Spotify to launch generative AI music models in the future. With this deal, Spotify’s models will allow fans to create covers and remixes of their favorite songs from participating artists and songwriters signed to UMG. The new deal was announced on Thursday (May 21) as part of Spotify’s Investor Day presentation, and the company touts that it will open up additional revenue streams on top of what artists already earn on Spotify and will provide new discovery opportunities for participating UMG talent. These AI products will eventually become available to premium users as a paid add-on. It is unclear when they are set to launch.
“We recognize there’s a wide range of views on use of generative music tools within the artistic community,” the announcement read. “Therefore, artists and rightsholders will choose if and how to participate to ensure the use of AI tools aligns with the values of the people behind the music.”
Spotify also announced a feature called “Reserved” that will set aside concert tickets for Premium subscribers it identifies as an artist’s most dedicated fans. “Getting concert tickets today can feel like a race you’re set up to lose,” Spotify wrote in a post on Thursday. “You show up at the right time, refresh endlessly, and still miss out. Too often, the experience is stressful, unpredictable, and disconnected from what should matter most: whether real fans actually get tickets. We think there’s a better way.”

I heard an absolute banger

By OrangeTide • Score: 3 Thread

I hope AI can help me make something like this absolute banger song

Well that’s made that decision easy.

By Computershack • Score: 3 Thread
My 12 month Premium sub ended a week ago, I was contemplating on whether to continue subscribing, already a bit reluctant to due to the amount of AI slop on it and this will just make it ten times worse. This has made my decision much easier. Now to decide where to go next.

This Cannes Film Cost $500,000 to Make. $400,000 Was AI Compute Costs.

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Higgsfield AI is debuting a 95-minute fully AI-generated film at Cannes called “Hell Grind” that reportedly cost $500,000 to make, $400,000 of which was spent on compute alone. The project took just two weeks to produce and is intended to showcase the startup’s AI production tools. But it also underscores the current limits of AI filmmaking: thousands of detailed prompts, endless iteration, high costs, and plenty of traditional filmmaking judgment were still required. The Wall Street Journal reports:
What might surprise viewers is how much technical film know-how was needed to create the movie, said Adil Alimzhanov, a content lead at Higgsfield who also worked on it. “You have to understand camera composition, which shots are changed. Like you can’t have two close-ups back to back, you have to start with an establishing shot,” he said. “You still need those filmmaking skills.” Higgsfield, which was valued at $1.3 billion in its latest funding round earlier this year, crossed $400 million in annual revenue run rate in May. It doesn’t make the actual video-generation models, relying instead on existing tools like Google’s Veo 3. But it does provide the tooling on top to make sure that the visuals are consistent across all the incoming generations.

The core of the movie-making process here was prompting the AI models and getting clips back, Alimzhanov said. Each prompt would generate about 15 seconds of footage. Those 15 seconds needed to be generated a number of times, with tweaks to the prompt to get the best possible version. The first 25 minutes of the movie required 16,181 initial video generations, which ended up as 253 final shots. One of the biggest difficulties in making longer-form films with AI is maintaining consistency across the outputs. AI models can be unpredictable, and a feature-length film can’t have scenes that look completely different from one moment to the next.

Because of that, every prompt had to be extremely long and detailed. Each one would typically start with a prefix that defined requirements like style (8k IMAX, photorealistic), lighting (natural light only, “contre-jour” backlight, camera on shadow side) and the type of camera it should look like it was being shot on (“cine lens,” 180-degree shutter motion blur). The lighting was key to avoiding the AI sheen that typically gets branded as “slop,” said Alimzhanov. AI-generated video tends to over-light scenes in an unnatural way. That prefix would also have to remind the AI to obey the laws of physics with wording like: “gravity and inertia respected — mass has real weight, correct contact shadows, no floating props.” The individual prompts were, on average, 3,000 words each.

One aspect of what Higgsfield has built, and sells to clients, is an AI tool that generates these complex, detailed prompts. Users can enter a page from the original script, and the Higgsfield tool will return with a prompt that could be thousands of words long, designed to create production-quality outputs. And all that prompting is how the company racked up a $400,000 AI compute bill on the project. Co-founder and CEO Alex Mashrabov, however, noted that working with “cloud” providers, like Nebius and CoreWeave, rather than big hyperscalers, helped it keep costs from going even higher.
You can watch the trailer for Hell Grind on YouTube and judge the results for yourself.

“money spent on compute…”

By Valgrus Thunderaxe • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Compute is not a noun.

The future of film making

By skam240 • Score: 3 Thread

I think the future of film making is a small handful of creatives using AI software to make a movie and overall I think this will be good for cinema. While I do think it will be a shame to lose all of the acting and craft person jobs (amongst others) making movie making cheap enough for the common person to enter into the field without major financial backers means opening the way for a lot more creatives to make good cinema.

And before I hear it, yes this will mean a ton more crap movies out there as well. If we can find the good stuff to watch on YouTube though then we’ll be able to find the good stuff for cinema under the conditions I describe as well.

Basically, an era where big Hollywood will no longer be able to act as gatekeepers to what we watch? Count me in.

Re:The movie looks pretty bad

By drinkypoo • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Most people want things to just work, and then they delude themselves into thinking they do even when they do not.

If I had a dollar for every person who I’ve seen join a 3d printing group and ask how they can print more than the models shipped on the machine, I could buy another printer. It’s a desktop-sized industrial robot, not a games console.

Re: Polar Express with explosions?

By jddj • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I’ll take ‘What is"Primer”' for $55,000, Ken.

Near the neolithic cave painting level with AI

By drnb • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Getting a coherent style good or bad from AI requires training, which is a lot harder than just prompting. Since AI isn’t actually working from pictures, just statistical analyses of them, it has a really hard time giving consistency. A real art department making a real film has a body of concept art, samples, and other resources to draw from and compare to, and brains to do it with.

The problem is more that the prompts to the AI are too simplistic. There is too much context and background info in human minds and we take things for granted. The trick to using AI is the human learning how to feed info and instructions to the AI more accurately and more completely. We’re new at this, still pretty low on the learning curve. A human drawing on an iPad still has thousands of years of institutional knowledge from painting and drawing that can apply. With respect to AI, we’re kind of at the neolithic cave painting level.

Venmo Redesign Makes New Users’ Posts Friends-Only by Default

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Venmo is testing a major redesign that will make new users’ payment posts viewable by their friends by default instead of being public. The Verge reports:
It’s a notable update for a platform that has struggled with privacy in the past. In 2021, BuzzFeed News tracked down President Joe Biden’s Venmo account and the accounts of people in his inner circle because Venmo, at the time, had no way to keep your Venmo contacts private. It fixed that soon after.

As part of the redesign, if you’re a new user and you do want your posts to be public (or private just to you), you’ll be able to set that as part of the new onboarding flow. You can also change your preference in settings after the fact; an updated screen for sending money will also show if that post is private, visible just to friends, or is visible publicly before you make the transaction.

Why would you ever want that to be public?

By PhantomHarlock • Score: 3 Thread

I can’t understand the thought process behind them making everything public by default. Why on earth would anyone want personal financial transactions public?

That’s the first setting I changed when I installed the app. I don’t use it much, but some people prefer to be paid that way.

Samsung Chip Workers To Get $340,000 Average Bonus In AI Boom

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Samsung is reportedly set to pay chip-division workers an average bonus of about $340,000 after reaching a tentative deal with its union, according to Bloomberg (paywalled). The deal ended a standoff that “could have cost the economy as much as 1 trillion won ($658 million) daily, with losses potentially multiplying to 100 trillion won ($68 billion) if in-progress semiconductor wafers were rendered unusable,” reports Quartz. From the report:
The agreement, subject to a union ratification vote running May 22 through May 27, calls for Samsung to direct 10.5% of operating profit into stock bonuses along with a separate 1.5% cash component, according to Bloomberg. The program runs for 10 years, contingent on the company meeting profit thresholds. One-third of the stock award can be liquidated right away, with the rest parceled out in installments across the next two years, Bloomberg reported. The first payout is expected in early 2027.

Not all workers will fare equally. As an illustration, Reuters cited a union source estimating that someone in the memory chip unit earning an 80-million-won base salary could take home roughly 626 million won in total bonuses this year. By comparison, workers at SK Hynix stand to collect upward of 700 million won should their employer post annual profit of 250 trillion won, Reuters calculated. Unlike at Samsung, SK Hynix employees are not limited to stock payouts and may instead opt for cash, Reuters reported.

Scam

By CEC-P • Score: 3 Thread
When the AI bubble collapses, their stock will absolutely crash. “One-third of the stock award can be liquidated right away” - Yeah, I would do that. Honestly, they should have paid them in DDR5.

Average is doing a lot of work there

By rsilvergun • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
I can’t be the only one that noticed. Still, their unions got them the money. And it’s still a lot of money. Just a reminder that divided we beg, United we Bargain.

Re: Scam

By reanjr • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

And during the downturn, they’ll be accruing even more low priced shares that will soar on recovery. It’s not even close to a scam. It’s a measured compromise that ensures long term value for the union workers.

Imagine This Happening in the USA

By crunchy_one • Score: 5, Funny Thread
(Please mod Funny)

A Bipartisan Amendment Would End Police License Plate Tracking Nationwide

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Wired:
US lawmakers plan to introduce an amendment Thursday at a House committee markup hearing that would prohibit any recipient of federal highway funding from using automated license plate readers for any purpose other than tolling — a sweeping restriction that, if adopted, would bring an immediate end to state and local ALPR programs across the United States. The amendment, obtained first by WIRED, is sponsored by Representative Scott Perry, a Pennsylvania Republican and Freedom Caucus member, and Representative Jesus “Chuy” Garcia, an Illinois progressive whose state has become a flash point in the national fight over ALPR misuse.

The House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee will mark up the underlying bill — a $580 billion, five-year reauthorization of federal surface transportation programs — at 10 am ET on Thursday. The amendment runs a single sentence: “A recipient of assistance under Title 23, United States Code, may not use automated license plate readers for any purpose other than tolling.” The amendment is brief, but its reach would be vast. Title 23 funds roughly a quarter of all public road mileage in the US, including most state and county arteries and many city streets where ALPR cameras are becoming ubiquitous. Conditioning that funding on a ban of the technology would, in practical effect, force any state, county, or municipality that takes federal highway money (essentially all of them) to either remove the cameras or restructure their use around tolling alone.

The amendment’s cosponsors, Perry and Garcia, represent opposite ends of the House’s ideological spectrum but converge on a surveillance concern that has gathered momentum in legislatures and city halls across the US as ALPR networks have quietly become a pervasive layer of American road infrastructure. ALPR cameras — mounted on poles, overpasses, traffic signals, and police cruisers — photograph every passing license plate, log times and locations, and feed data into searchable databases shared across agencies and jurisdictions. […] Privacy advocates have long warned that the aggregation of license plate data amounts to a de facto warrantless tracking system. New York University School of Law’s Brennan Center for Justice has documented the integration of ALPR feeds into police data-fusion systems that combine plate data with surveillance and social media monitoring. And the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a digital rights nonprofit, has documented a range of police misuse, including the past targeting of mosques and the disproportionate deployment of the technology in low-income neighborhoods.
Earlier this week, 404 Media reviewed FBI procurement records that reveal the agency is seeking up to $36 million for nationwide access to ALPR data, which could let it query vehicle movements across the U.S. and its territories through a commercial database.

Loopholes?

By cruff • Score: 3 Thread
Are they assuming most law enforcement and civic jurisdictions doing this are receiving federal funds? The ban would have to extend to prohibiting contracting with third parties who don’t themselves receive federal funding.

This would be amazing, and therefore cannot stand

By flibbidyfloo • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
There’s no way this ends up happening because it would be a wonderful thing for our rights, and ‘murica doesn’t do that kind of thing any more.

Mixed feelings

By Keick • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

We’ve had a marked increase of these fixed license plate readers popping up all over my community (~30,000 pop) supposedly for the purpose of catching kidnappers. I know of at least 4 between my house and my office (7 miles).

That is absolutely a noble cause and according to grok there are roughly 2000 per year in my state. However it also notes that less than 4% of those “not family disputes” related, and the stereotypical abduction is only several hundred a year country-wide.

Which means that’s a rather large expense (liberty, and dollars) for an extremely rare event. Which also means that can’t possibly be the real reason for these fixed plate readers that are popping up all over South Western Virginia.

20 years ago when it required a human in the loop watching traffic camera feeds looking for a specific vehicle/plate it seemed reasonable limit of the technology that kept the privacy aspect somewhat in check.

But now with AI vision, each plate can be detected a location/time stamped and stored for decades. Given police historical access to every vehicle that ever passed one of these readers for all of time; Someone robs a 7-Eleven and only knows the guy was in a red truck… now every red truck that was ever picked up by a reader in town within 30 minutes of said robbery is a person of interest.

Re:Thank you

By Pascoea • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Nice to know I can make a clear shot across state lines with no interference.

Oh piss off with your “think of the children” nonsense. If you’re so worried about your daughter there are countless ways to help keep her safe that don’t involve the government warrantlessly tracking the entire population. Teaching her how to properly knee someone in the groin is far more effective anyway.

Home Depot and Lowe’s are installing them

By wwphx • Score: 3 Thread
Not only are the cameras spreading all over town here, I went to buy some stuff at Home Depot and found them at the entrances to their lot. So I turned around to go to Lowe’s, and found the same thing there. Did a little digging and found that they have ‘a problem with shoplifting’ and this is their solution. So I guess I’m taking my business to Ace and Harbor Freight and some other locals.

I’m estimating that my plate is getting tagged at least a half-dozen times a day.

Steve Wozniak Tells Graduates They All Have ‘AI’: Actual Intelligence

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
While other commencement speeches have been met with boos for hyping up artificial intelligence, Apple cofounder Steve Wozniak reminded college graduates that they already posses “AI” of their own: “actual intelligence.” He framed AI as an attempt to duplicate brain-like routines, and encouraged students to “think different” as they enter a workforce being reshaped by automation. Business Insider reports:
Steve Wozniak did what other college graduation commencement speakers couldn’t this year: earn applause when talking about AI. The Apple cofounder took the stage during Grand Valley State University’s graduation ceremony earlier this month. During his speech, Wozniak offered reassurance to new graduates who are entering the workforce at the height of the AI revolution.

“It would take too long to go deeply into what I think about AI, but we’ve been trying to create a brain,” Wozniak said. “Is there a way we can duplicate a routine a trillion times and have it work like a brain? AI is one of those attempts.” […]

During his commencement address, Wozniak reflected on working at Apple and offered students some advice as they begin their careers. “You should always try to think different,” he said. “Don’t follow the same steps as a million other people. Think, is there something I can do a little different?”
You can watch the clip on YouTube.

Re:good people

By sg_oneill • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

He could easily have been a billionare with Jobs. Jobs wanted him by his side the whole way, but Woz is built different. He doesn’t really care about doing the billionare thing , he made enough from his apple shares that he’ll never want for anything. Hell, I doubt apple would even let him go broke, he was the left hand of their god-king Jobs.

He just wants to do cool tech and make the world around him better.

Wozniak

By backslashdot • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

He is exactly the right guy for a commencement speech — providing the right blend of inspiration and “serve humanity” reminder, not the creep CEOs.

Re:Wozniak

By backslashdot • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The CEOs will sell some fake BS about serving humanity too (aka become a corporate slave), but with Wozniak .. you know the guy lives it. He follows his passion, tries to actually make things that are useful .. compare that with a CEO who is trying to balance making the cheapest possible product with the highest possible quarterly profits. Grads need to see that. We need the next generation to care about each other, and to be Steel (of the Richard Matheson story).

Lemme tellya a story about Eve & the REAL Appl

By Pseudonymous Powers • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Woz is widely liked, and I personally believe that his heart usually seems to be in the right place. And it’s hard to tell much about the content of his speech from the article. But the idea of making a TRUE artificial mind, only to immediately enslave it as a soldier in a war against human well-being, is such an obvious horror to me that I can’t understand how anybody smart would support it even slightly.

The entire speech

By 2phar • Score: 5, Informative Thread
It’s a great speech. Here it is in full: https://www.youtube.com/watch?…

At Least 80% Responsibility For Ill Health In Old Age Down to Individual, Study Says

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
A new Oxford Longevity Project report argues that individuals bear at least 80% of the responsibility for ill health in old age. “The report (PDF), launched at the Smart Ageing Summit in Oxford last week, argues that individuals have far greater control over their longevity than is commonly understood,” reports The Guardian. “The authors call on the government to take legislative action on alcohol comparable to restrictions on smoking.” From the report:
Living Longer, Better — the Oxford Longevity Project’s first Age-less report — was co-authored by an interdisciplinary panel of UK-based experts in medicine, physiology, ageing and education policy. It was sponsored by Oxford Healthspan. The report’s authors, Sir Christopher Ball, Sir Muir Gray, Dr Paul Ch’en, Leslie Kenny and Prof Denis Noble, present the figure of 80% as a conservative estimate. […] The claim, however, has been described as simplistic and said to neglect wider arguments about whether people are genuinely in control of individual choices when it comes to issues including poverty, pollution and healthcare access.

[…] Ball, however, pointed to research including the Landmark Twins Study, where researchers concluded at least 75% of human lifespan is determined by environmental and modifiable lifestyle factors. He also cited large-scale analysis led by Oxford Population Health using data from nearly 500,000 UK Biobank participants which found that environmental exposures and habits carry far greater weight in premature death and biological ageing than inherited genetics. The report’s recommendations include avoiding processed foods, abstaining entirely from alcohol, prioritising sleep, not eating after 6.30pm, and cultivating what it calls “a not-meat mindset.” On alcohol, it takes a position more forthright than current government guidance. “Alcohol is toxic, don’t drink it,” said Ball. “The report bravely says so — whereas the government is afraid to tell the public the truth.”

Oh fuck.

By Petersko • Score: 5, Funny Thread

The report’s recommendations include avoiding processed foods, abstaining entirely from alcohol, prioritising sleep, not eating after 6.30pm, and cultivating what it calls “a not-meat mindset.” On alcohol, it takes a position more forthright than current government guidance. “Alcohol is toxic, don’t drink it,” said Ball.

Let’s hope I make it through the night.

Re:should have been dead ten years ago.

By quintessencesluglord • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

What is the saying- man with no health problems, short life. man with health problem, long life?

Most healthy-ish people aren’t aware of the damage they do to their bodies until it is too late, whereas people with chronic conditions are more mindful of their health.

Especially for some careers, they aren’t designed with health in mind and falls into to the same personal blame for any shortcomings instead of the system that lead them there.

Austerity

By Petersko • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I don’t think a healthy life, in and of itself, is all that laudable a goal. I’m reminded of The Witches of Eastwick… “When I die, I want to be sick. Not healthy.” The question is, who benefits from the extended lifespan? Because it came at a cost. Opportunity cost… but a cost nonetheless.

Were I to live an austere life in perfect health, eschewing all of the wonderful but deleterious things life has to offer in favor of longevity, I doubt I would face my death without specific regret. Conversely, if I die in my early 70s of health issues stemming from questionable life choices, I’m pretty sure whatever regret I have would be abstract, and not even all that defendable. “Should have laid off the bacon and scotch… maybe… should I have? They were so good…”

I’m not suggesting people should be unmoderated hedonists. But I salt my cooking until I’m happy with the taste, I love coffee, I think beef tallow is underrated, and my smoker and grill are well loved.

Absolutely.

By Qbertino • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I did a diploma in performing arts in the the 90ies. The first half of my 20ies was dancing 5+ hours per weekday. I still benefit from that phase. As a teenager I was into climbing. I still have the shoulder muscles from that time, despite totally slacking on strength training. But no smoking, no drugs, no alcohol. And I have been dancing Argentine Tango for the last 18 years, 9 of which where an artsy minimalist lifestyle built around intensely dancing Tango 3+ times a week. My sleep schedule was as off as with my other thing, software development, but otherwise my health was awesome, physically and mentally. Intensely hugging hot ladies 3+ times a week for hours on end does wonders for a hetero-males well-being. I regularly get judged 10 years younger than I am.
Processed foods are organic as much as possible, I avoid junkfood 95% of the time and I’ve started cooking for myself 10 years ago. Huge impact.

I’ve since have taken Tango down a notch and picked up motorscooter/motorbike as means of travelling and getting around. Getting slightly overweight for the first time in my life. Not good, don’t like it. I’m roughly 10 years too late in picking up a daily excercise/yoga, cardio and strength schedule, a thing I definitely need to get going this year. Started hiking with my sweetheart, we want to pick up the pace and intensity of that to stay healthy in old age.

I keep telling my 28 year old daughter that she dare never not stop her daily yoga practice. I hope she can do that.

It’s this simple: Objectively the very best retirement plan is actively working on your health, strength, endurance and flexibility multiple times a week. Way more significant than being wealthy at old age.

I’d rather be top fit at 70 living off 700 Euros per month than overweight with two bipasses living off 2000.

Oh fuck off…

By devslash0 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

“Non-meat mindset”. You want to be a veggie? Absolutely fine. But shut the f up and stop telling other people what they should and should not eat themselves.

AT&T Sues California In Bid To Stop Offering Traditional Phone Service

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Reuters:
AT&T on Wednesday filed suit (PDF) against California officials seeking a court order declaring it does not have to continue offering traditional copper wire phone service to new customers as it vowed to spend $19 billion on modern telecom services. California requires the U.S. wireless carrier to spend $1 billion annually to maintain a century-old telephone network that few use, AT&T said, saying the network now serves just 3% of households in AT&T’s California territory.

AT&T’s suit named the California Public Utilities Commission and the state attorney general. AT&T said it is committing to investing $19 billion in California as it works to connect more than 4 million additional households and businesses across California by 2030 and added IP-based networks are far more reliable and efficient. AT&T also Wednesday asked the Federal Communications Commission for permission to discontinue traditional phone service in parts of California where it has faster, more reliable service available. It also filed a petition with the FCC to declare that California’s rules that effectively require AT&T to power, repair and sell traditional phone service, even after the FCC has authorized the service to be phased out, are preempted by federal standards.

AT&T added that transitioning from copper will save an estimated 300 million kilowatt-hours annually by 2030 or the equivalent of eliminating emissions from 17 million gallons of gasoline. The company added that California has already suffered about 2,000 outages from copper thefts this year and it struggles to find replacement parts. The federal government and virtually all states where AT&T historically offered copper-wire service “have now eliminated outdated regulatory obstacles” allowing AT&T to begin powering down its old network and increasing its investments in modern communication technologies, the company said in its lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court in southern California.

Re:Make them pay

By jhoegl • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
The US taxpayers paid for this 5x over over the past 20 years.

Re:Make them pay

By markdavis • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

>“The US taxpayers paid for this 5x over over the past 20 years.”

Not just through taxes, but from consumer bills. Take a guess at what my copper land line now costs me per month. A single line with ZERO features- no caller ID, no 3-way calling, no call waiting. AND with no long distance ability and with restricted number of calls per month (I think it is 50 or something). It is the absolute lowest-end, most restricted POTS option from Verizon. $41.

And what does my full service T-Mobile cell line, that includes long distance, caller ID, conferencing, unlimited calling, unlimited texting, AND “unlimited” data cost? $42.

Yeah, something isn’t right. Cell towers are very expensive and also require maintenance and upgrades, power and backup and land connections, and there are lots of them. I keep the land line because I have had that number for something like 35 years, it works without power, it is a separate backup for normal and emergency use, and I don’t want most people knowing my cell number. Yeah, I can port the number over to IP based, but the POTS land line is far more reliable than my cable company’s coax crap, which is my only option. And if I do it through my cable company’s plan, it costs almost the same, about $40, so I save nothing. So I would have to use some third party system and buy the hardware. That might be what ultimately happens. I have just been waiting to be pissed off enough :)

Re:The energy ‘savings’ are just moved

By larwe • Score: 5, Informative Thread
Of all the things that never happened, this never happened the most. Flip over any POTS phone sold for the US market. You’ll see a REN marking on the bottom - Ringer Equivalence Number. That number specifically characterizes the current drawn by the device when ringing. 1.0 is your standard legacy electromagnetic clapper. Electronic phones are typically in the ballpark of 0.25. If you put too many devices on your line, the world comes to an end - sorry, no, I mistyped - if you put too many devices on your line, one or more of them won’t ring properly. In the days of pure electromagnets, consumer lines were typically rated for a total REN of 5, meaning you could have your main phone and 4 extensions on the same line. If you put too much load on the line, in the electromagnet days, you’d get quiet or no ringing. These days I can’t imagine plugging in enough devices to overload the line, but if you did they would behave erratically. There is no “blowing the breakers by putting too many phones on the line”. Circuit protection devices at the telco end prevent your shenanigans from causing trouble for other people.

Re: Win/win

By OrangeTide • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

He would benefit from smug satisfaction even while the price of cheese doubles.

it’s not about power

By v1 • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

POTS lines use very little power nowadays. Decades ago they still used very little power, except when ringing. Those electromagnets hitting big bells did take some juice, but the actual power required once you lifted the receiver is very low. Modern (transistor-based, with piezo tweeters for ringing) are much more efficient, all the time.

This is about them having to continue to keep tabs on and maintain equipment that they’ve been maintaining for decades. This isn’t about additional costs, it’s about them wanting to cut costs by ditching gear that’s expensive to maintain and gets far less use than it was designed for. (it’s efficient at scale, and the scale has gone)

I can’t say I blame them. Imagine your old house got central air a decade ago, and you still have a window air conditioner in the living room, and you’d like to get rid of it, but the city is saying you can’t remove it, and have to keep it maintained and working, and pay for annual inspections.

The only reason we still see around 4% landline usage is simply inertia. Old people don’t want to give it up because they don’t like change or learning something new, younger people that have it don’t have a reason to get rid of it and see it as a cheap “just-in-case” backup, and there’s a really small percentage of people (I’d venture a guess at under a tenth of a percent) that have a good reason to keep it.

So the question is “at what point do we tell that tenth of a percent to look elsewhere?” There’s tons of other good examples, how about leaded gas? or R34 freon coolant? or businesses accepting cheques? or something closer to home on the issue - pay phones on many street corners? Technology moves on, and the longer you wait to move on once the writing is on the wall, the bigger of a personal hassle it’s going to be. (I see this all the time with computers, upgrade people! get rid of that ten year old doorstop! I don’t care if “it still works”, you need to modernize!)

so the TL;DR of my rant is “it’s not about the power use, but the telco doesn’t want to come right out and call you a hold-out that needs to get with the times so we can all move on.” Power savings looks like something that’s “good for everyone” instead of pointing fingers at the stubborn few.

Thousands of Zillow Listings In Chicago Have Vanished

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Thousands of Chicago-area Zillow and Trulia listings disappeared after Midwest Real Estate Data cut off Zillow’s access to its feed, “in the latest escalation of a legal battle with Lisle-based Midwest Real Estate Data (MRED),” reports the Chicago Sun-Times. “The fight is over MRED’s private listing network, where homes for sale are shared among real estate professionals. And MRED followed through on a threat to cut Zillow’s access to its listing data feed.” From the report:
There were nearly 5,000 Chicago homes listed on Zillow Tuesday, but as of Wednesday afternoon, that number plummeted to about 1,700. Meanwhile, other listing sites like Redfin and Realtor.com show about 5,000 to 8,000 listings in Chicago. MRED manages listings — submitted by brokers — throughout Illinois, as well as parts of Wisconsin and Indiana. The regional multiple listing service has more than 43,000 members and processed more than 264,000 listings worth $43 billion in 2025. The loss of listings on Zillow’s websites have made a behind-the-scenes real estate industry fight public. And it now hinders some consumers in their search to buy a home, while also limiting the marketing opportunity for sellers.
The legal fight is basically over who gets to control how home listings are marketed and displayed online.
Zillow recently adopted a rule saying that if a home is marketed privately, such as behind a paywall, login, or private listing network, it should not also appear on Zillow. The policy, the real estate marketplace says, is meant to discourage “pocket listings,” preserve transparency, and make sure buyers can see the full market.

MRED sees it differently. It expanded its private listing network and partnered with Compass, which wants to give sellers more control over whether their homes are broadly publicized or marketed privately first. MRED argues that Zillow is violating MLS rules and licensing agreements by refusing to display certain listings, including private Compass listings. Consumers are now caught in the middle…

Re: Having your cake and eating it too

By hwihyw • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

You shouldn’t get to list a home “privately” to limit competition while still demanding access to Zillow’s massive public traffic.
But that is exactly the hustle MRED and Compass are pulling. They want to hide listings in their “private network” of 43,000 insiders so they can keep transactions “in-house” and represent both the buyer and the sellerâ"pocketing both sides of the commission. Yet, they still expect public portals to advertise them.
Zillow’s rule is basic common sense: if you want to hide a listing from the open market, you don’t get to use the open market’s biggest megaphone to do it. MRED retaliating by cutting Zillow’s access and plummeting Chicago listings from 5,000 to 1,700 isn’t about “seller choice.” It’s a coordinated boycott designed to force buyers back into a closed, high-commission gatekeeper system.

Re: Having your cake and eating it too

By Smidge204 • Score: 5, Informative Thread

> If I want to sell my house, why shouldn’t I be able to sell it and advertise it how I want to?

You can. Nobody is saying you can’t. That’s not the problem.

  > Why *shouldn’t* I be able to access Zillow’s advertising service and sell my house privately?

I think you’re conflating the word “private” here. This isn’t about you listing your home as a “privately” as a private individual, it’ about MRED maintaining “private” (e.g. exclusive) access to that listing. MRED and Compass are monopolizing the rights to broker your property’s sale but still want Zillow to do the advertising for them.

  > Selling and advertising are two different things, there is no ethical reason to tie them together.

Correct, but Amazon should not expect eBay to show Amazon store page results when you search for things on eBay. Amazon maintains a walled garden of sellers and you must go through Amazon as an intermediary to buy and sell anything there. You want to list your stuff for sale on Amazon but still want eBay users to see it… why should eBay accommodate that bullshit?

MRED wants access to Zillow’s users while simultaneously cutting independent brokers out of the business, and Zillow justifiably has a problem with that.
=Smidge=

Re: Having your cake and eating it too

By SeaFox • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Why *shouldn’t* I be able to access Zillow’s advertising service and sell my house privately?

Because it’s not your decision. Zillow is a private company and they can choose to exclude listings that are not available on the open market if they want to. Really… shades of “demanding freedom of speech on non-public forums” here.

MRED could make their own real estate search and advertising site and only show their “in-network” properties — but they don’t want to do that because, besides the actual expense of building and running their own site, they don’t have the brand recognition that Zillow has. They just want to piggyback off an existing popular site.

Re: Having your cake and eating it too

By SeaFox • Score: 4, Informative Thread

If I want Zillow to list my house, I can list with Zillow and not with MRED. If I think MRED is a better deal and will get me a buyer sooner, I can list with them.

Okay, but it sounds like you want to use MRED’s service (where a potential buyer has to buy with a MRED agent — because you are selling with an MRED agent) and still be advertised on Zillow. Zillow doesn’t want to list homes that have that sort of buyer restriction on them.They want a buyer to be free to use any realtor for their side of transaction. This isn’t an ethical dilemma, it’s a business decision. Zillow is saying if MRED wants a website where they can list homes for their “insiders” scheme they need to make their own site and not use the Zillow brand as essentially a private advertising platform.

Is this the start of a redlining attempt?

By Calibax • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Undoubtedly MRED and Compass are trying to double dip on commissions. But having a private, preferred network of 43,000 subscribers could easily be the beginning of redlining by offering some listings only to clients in “preferred” areas, and the other listings not in these areas to the general public.

Vivaldi 8.0 Arrives With ‘Most Significant Design Overhaul’ In Browser’s History

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Vivaldi 8.0 is being pitched as the browser’s "most significant design overhaul” yet, featuring a new unified, edge-to-edge interface, six preset layouts, and deeper customization across tabs, toolbars, panels, and themes. The company is also taking a swipe at rivals chasing questionable AI features. Neowin reports:
After updating to version 8.0, Vivaldi will present you with the ability to select one of the six pre-built styles. You can select a minimal edge-to-edge theme, one with the UI fully hidden for focused work, or a power user variant with everything on the screen. The update comes with a built-in collection theme, and users are free to select one of over 7,000 community themes available on the official website.

Vivaldi says that while other browsers were busy adding questionable AI features, it focused on “a foundation that no other browser can match” with flexible tab management, built-in productivity tools, and advanced customization. At the same time, Vivaldi does not force the new design onto its users, so those who prefer the previous user interface can go back to it at any moment in settings.
“With 8.0, we have done something we have been working toward for a long time: we have given the browser itself a visual system worthy of everything it can do,” says Vivaldi’s CEO and co-founder, Jon Stephenson von Tetzchner. “With this update Vivaldi feels like one considered, coherent tool.”
You can download Vivaldi 8.0 and view the changelog at their respective links.

No uBlock Origin, Chromium manifest v3

By caseih • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

While they are doing creative things with the UI (but not really to my taste), at the end of the day it’s just another Chrome browser, so no manifest v2 support and no uBlock Origin. While Vivaldi puts in their own ad blocker safety system, it’s nowhere near as good as uBlock Origin. I don’t understand why Vivaldi devs don’t patch manifest v2 back in. Would be a huge selling point.

So Firefox remains the only game in town for safe web browsing. I keep Vivaldi around for the odd site that won’t work in Firefox, but it’s definitely not my daily driver.

Just Another Chromium Reskin.

By robbak • Score: 4 Thread

I’m sure they are adding a bunch of other stuff, but at it’s heart, it’s just chromium.

Really wish we had a more healthy market for browser engines.

Trump Calls Off AI Executive Order Over Concern It Could Weaken US Tech Edge

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot
Trump called off a planned AI executive order just hours before a signing ceremony because he said he was worried the framework could slow America’s lead over China. “We’re leading China, we’re leading everybody, and I don’t want to do anything that’s going to get in the way of that lead,” Trump told reporters. The Associated Press reports:
The order would have established a framework for the government to vet the national security risks of the most advanced AI systems before their public release, according to a person familiar with the White House’s deliberations with the tech industry but not authorized to speak about it publicly. The directive was being characterized as a voluntary collaboration with participating U.S.-based tech companies, including Anthropic, OpenAI and Google, the person said.

There are competing factions within the administration, said Serena Booth, a computer science professor at Brown University and former AI policy fellow in a Democratic-led Senate committee. “We do see this kind of public fighting,” she said. "‘We will release an executive order. No, we won’t. We’re going to sign it this afternoon. Oh, the signing is canceled.’ I think this whiplash is because we’re seeing these fractures.’"

Some of those divides are balancing what Booth said is a “reasonable idea” to test the most capable AI models before their public release, with a concern that government scrutiny, if it takes too long, could burden AI developers. “It does come at a potential very large cost to innovation and speed of development,” she said. “There is, I think, a real risk here and I do see both sides.” […]

“They don’t want to do it because it’s politically risky in a million different ways,” said Dean Ball, now at the Foundation for American Innovation. Ball said he would welcome an executive order that would get those companies working more closely with the government on cybersecurity but “ultimately, I’m fine with them taking time to get this right.”

Trump coin spike

By r1348 • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

https://www.coinbase.com/it/pr…

Trump coin value spiked between signing the executive order and recalling it. Lots of buyers.
I’m sure it’s all a coincidence.

Re:How about passing a law instead of EO?

By thegarbz • Score: 5, Informative Thread

False. W Bush II had less EOs than W Bush I.
Obama did tick up in his first time, but Obama II had less than W Bush I.
Both Obamas had less than both W Bushes.

Then Trump attempted to match Jimmy Carter’s insanely high number, but only became the biggest abuser but only became the worst president in 40 years (what a loser, beaten by a Democrat at ruling by decree)

Then Biden dropped down to a number between Obama II and W Bush I bringing us back to reasonable levels. It was such a lovely sleepy time.

Then Trump WENT ABSOLUTELY FUCKING INSANE and blasted through his previous 4 year number in under a year very much putting him on target to sign more EOs than Truman did nearly a century ago.

No each admiration doesn’t get worse. They flip back and forth having hit a number not too different from their past numbers (for that political party) with the Democrats slightly better than the republicans on average over the past 40 years, keeping a trend that was perfectly normal right until King Trump II took office last year.

He absolutely does not

By rsilvergun • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Trump does one of two things. In this case he was most likely just soliciting a bribe. He probably put some things in the order he knew some of the people with money didn’t like and sat back and waited until they opened their checkbooks.

But the other thing he does is push the absolute limits of what he can get away with, go past those limits, get his hand slapped just a tiny bit by the court and then back off a little bit after establishing a new normal where he can commit more crimes and we all just shrug it off because he’s making America great again.

So somebody draws the line, he doesn’t just step over it he gets in his golf cart and drives a quarter mile over it then the courts yell at him and he backs his golf cart up a few hundred feet but he is still over the line.

Re:How about passing a law instead of EO?

By OrangeTide • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

It’s what a majority of people voted for. If numerous warnings and his previous term weren’t informative enough, then maybe some of us should stay away from the ballot box.

Re:Trump coin spike

By ArchieBunker • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

And to think they made Jimmy Carter sell his peanut farm.