Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Maryland Becomes First State To Pass Bill Banning ‘Surveillance Pricing’
  2. Amazon To Invest Up To Another $25 Billion In Anthropic
  3. iPhone Video Shows ‘Earthset’ From Space
  4. PlayStation To Require Age Verification For Messages and Voice Chat
  5. Mobile Phones To Be Banned In Schools In England Under New Plans
  6. Apple CEO Tim Cook Is Stepping Down
  7. Former Palantir Employee Running For Congress Unveils ‘AI Dividend’ Plan
  8. Deezer Says 44% of Songs Uploaded To Its Platform Daily Are AI-Generated
  9. Trump Administration Begins Refunding $166 Billion In Tariffs
  10. Palantir Posts Bond Villain Manifesto On X
  11. Allbirds’ Move To AI Has Echoes of the Dot-Com Frenzy
  12. NSA Using Anthropic’s Mythos Despite Blacklist
  13. Robots Beat Human Records At Beijing Half-Marathon
  14. Videos Catch Amazon Delivery Drones Dropping Packages From 10 Feet in the Air
  15. Zoom Partners With Sam Altman’s Iris-Scanning Company To Offer Callers Verifications of Humanness

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Maryland Becomes First State To Pass Bill Banning ‘Surveillance Pricing’

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Denver7:
Maryland is poised to become the first state in the country to ban “surveillance pricing.” The practice refers to companies using a shopper’s personal data, such as browsing history, location, or purchasing behavior, to tailor prices to individual customers. The Protection From Predatory Pricing Act, passed this month and sent to the governor for a signature, would prohibit food retailers and third-party delivery services from using the practice. Violations would be treated as deceptive trade practices under state law, with potential fines and lawsuits.
While Consumer Reports called the move “encouraging,” it warned that the final version contains “loopholes” that don’t fully protect consumers. Some of the exemptions noted in the report include “applying the ban only to the use of personal data to set higher prices without establishing a baseline or standard price; exempting pricing tied to loyalty or membership programs, even if prices are higher; and exempting pricing linked to subscriptions or subscription-based services.”

Amazon To Invest Up To Another $25 Billion In Anthropic

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Amazon is expanding its Anthropic partnership with a deal to invest up to another $25 billion, while Anthropic commits to spending more than $100 billion on AWS infrastructure over the next decade to power Claude. “Anthropic’s commitment to run its large language models on AWS Trainium for the next decade reflects the progress we’ve made together on custom silicon, as we continue delivering the technology and infrastructure our customers need to build with generative AI,” Amazon CEO Andy Jassy said in a statement. CNBC reports:
Amazon’s investment includes $5 billion into Anthropic now, with up to $20 billion in the future tied to “certain commercial milestones,” according to a release. The initial investment is at Anthropic’s latest valuation of $380 billion. Anthropic said in the release that it will bring nearly 1 gigawatt total of Trainium2 and Trainium3 capacity online by the end of the year.

With all of the major hyperscalers competing to build out AI capacity as quickly as possible, Amazon said in February that it expects to shell out roughly $200 billion this year on capital expenditures, mostly on AI infrastructure.

Oh come on!

By SumDog • Score: 3 Thread
We’re never going to get affordable RAM again, are we?

Re:Oh come on!

By haruchai • Score: 5, Funny Thread

640M ought to be enough for anybody

Re:Round and round

By martin-boundary • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Fairly soon after the oil price goes through the roof, I’d say. Because when there are no customers willing to open their wallets for AI toy products, the illusion of an endless source of revenue as big as the whole economy of the world will come crashing down. Bonus points if anyone prosecutes the cashed up insider traders.

Out of all the AI startups

By DrXym • Score: 3 Thread
Anthropic is the one that seems to deliver something more useful than just a lame chatbot. I will not be surprised when the bubble bursts and herd is thinned that that it will be the likes of Grok and OpenAI that die first - they’re useless outside of themselves and neither has other products & services that could cushion the cash cost required to sustain them.

If you think about it…

By Pseudonymous Powers • Score: 4, Informative Thread
…EVERYbody is investing UP TO 25 billion dollars in Anthropic. Because “up to” includes zero dollars.

iPhone Video Shows ‘Earthset’ From Space

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
NASA astronaut Reid Wiseman posted an out-of-this-world iPhone video on Sunday, showing Earth disappear behind the Moon at 8x zoom. “I could barely see the Moon through the docking hatch window but the iPhone was the perfect size to catch the view,” said Wiseman, noting that this video is “uncropped, uncut with 8x zoom” and “quite comparable to the view of the human eye.” The New York Times says the video marks the first time an “Earthset” has been captured on video.

“We’ve seen our fair share of remarkable images and videos from NASA’s Artemis II mission around the Moon. Some of those were even captured on iPhone,” notes 9to5Mac. “But Reid Wiseman, astronaut and commander for the Artemis II mission, just posted a new video that might take the crown for the most impressive yet.”

Free iPhones rather than Corvettes?

By drnb • Score: 5, Funny Thread
So are astronauts going to get free iPhones rather than free Corvettes? :-)

Compare with Spacex’s Starship

By greytree • Score: 3, Informative Thread
Spacex’s Starship gives us LIVE video of fucking reentry plasma, flaps as they disintegrate with the heat, splashdown.

After a couple of weeks, NASA’s Artemis finds an Iphone video one of the crew took.

Re:How far we have fallen

By necro81 • Score: 5, Informative Thread

The last Moon-missions used Hasselblad cameras with REAL objectives and now this.

Please stop complaining. Most of the awesome photography that happened on this mission was performed with Nikon D5s and Nikon glass. The D5 has been in use on the ISS for a long while, the astronaut corps is familiar with it, it’s proven its reliability in space environments, and has exceptional low-light capabilities.* Plus, Nikon works with NASA to provide custom firmware and related services.

And before you move the goal posts and start whining “but that camera is so old!” - they also brought a more modern Z9 with them. A modified Z9 will be what is used on the lunar surface.

More info: [1], [2], [3]

* The recent Hello World image that was in every media channel on Earth was shot at ISO 51200, because it’s actually capturing the night side of Earth. That is: Weissman took that picture in the dark.

iPhone iPhone iPhone

By Gramie2 • Score: 5, Funny Thread
Looks like that Apple sponsorship deal really paid off!

Re:Compare with Spacex’s Starship

By necro81 • Score: 4, Informative Thread

After a couple of weeks, NASA’s Artemis finds an Iphone video one of the crew took.

Have you been living under a rock? NASA live-streamed practically the entire mission on YouTube and other channels. Pictures taken by the astronauts were posted to NASA’s website on a daily basis, and splashed across every newspaper and media channel on the planet!

Bear in mind that during the Apollo mission, we had to wait for the astronauts to return and have film developed before anyone could see images.

PlayStation To Require Age Verification For Messages and Voice Chat

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
A new email from Sony says that PlayStation will require players to verify their age later this year to keep using communication features like messages and voice chat. Insider-Gaming reports:
The initiative comes from the goal of providing “safe, age-appropriate experiences for players and families while respecting their privacy” and providing “meaningful control over their gaming experiences.” The age-verification process will be implemented globally, and players will need to verify their age to continue using PlayStation communication services, such as messages and voice chat. If the player opts not to verify their age, they can still use other services, such as games, trophies, and the store. Only the communication experience will be affected if you choose not to verify your age. PlayStation didn’t provide a date for when players will need to begin the verification process.

Good.

By sit1963nz • Score: 3 Thread
Let’s keep the groomers away from kids.

Re:Good.

By sizzlinkitty • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

F the kids… nobody should care about them more than their parents who should already be parenting them correctly. My privacy is more important than your kids though and nobody should be forced to share their ID with companies that will ultimately lose that information in data breaches.

won’t someone think of the children?

By OrangeTide • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

And let’s also think about how we can harvest their parent’s data

Re:Good.

By sit1963nz • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
The world is NOT the USA.

The USA is the worst of things , Greed, Entitlement, Racism, Bigotry, Religion, etc etc etc and you protect the Pedo President…

You have nothing to offer the sane world.

Sony can track children

By NotEmmanuelGoldstein • Score: 3 Thread
Grown-ups will have to choose their privacy, or their addiction. Also, this gives the Sony the identity of every child using their software, and which adult pays for it.

The real problem is the consequences of their child customer’s PII being stolen: Since a child’s Id. is a blank slate, it will be much more valuable in a few years: Plenty of time for criminals to hang fake jobs and fake mortgages on the stolen identity.

Mobile Phones To Be Banned In Schools In England Under New Plans

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from the Guardian:
A ban on mobile phones in schools in England is to be introduced by the government to ensure that “critical safeguarding legislation” is passed. The government will table an amendment to the children’s wellbeing and schools bill in the House of Lords after the bill was held up by peers on opposition benches. It will make existing guidance on mobile phone bans in schools statutory, a move that ministers have resisted until now.

The government had consistently argued that the vast majority of schools had already banned mobile phones, and that there was no need to add a legal requirement. They finally capitulated, however, describing it as “a pragmatic measure” to get the bill through. […] The bill is regarded by many as the biggest piece of child protection legislation in decades and includes proposals for a compulsory register for children who are not in school, a crackdown on profiteering in children’s social care, and a “single unique identifier” to help agencies track a child’s welfare.

Good

By sit1963nz • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
It will help the kids learn by being less distracted.

Bold move, but jolly good!

By Morpeth • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Study after study shows kids do better in school, are more engaged, and more social when phones are out of the picture. ‘Social’ media is exactly the opposite, it’s isolating and anxiety inducing for a lot of teens.

I think there’s a lot of adults I know who might be better off too. I definitely have some friends / colleagues who waste so much time on it, and it mostly just seems to make them anxious or irate — but as far as the platforms are considered, who cares as long as they’re ‘engaged’ with it…

Re:In other news

By test321 • Score: 5, Informative Thread

as students can’t call for help.

On their way to and from school, pupils/students have their mobile phones, so there is no change in their ability to call for help on the public street. Inside school, they can call the staff for help.

Also you’re missing that this policy isn’t new. The only change is will become compulsory for the 0.2% primary schools and 10% secondary schools who still hadn’t banned mobile phones.

TFA:

Research from the children’s commissioner for England last year found that 99.8% of primary schools and 90% of secondary schools already had policies in place that limited or restricted the use of mobile phones during the school day.

The policy: https://www.gov.uk/government/…

Anecdotal evidence

By Gramie2 • Score: 5, Informative Thread
The Province of Quebec banned cell phones in schools in January 2024, and teachers (I sometimes work in schools) have told me that they see significant improvement, with fewer distractions and more personal interactions between students.

Re:DUMB phones

By test321 • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

I guess that students in the US are asked to park their car in an appropriate parking place and are not allowed to use their car inside a classroom. That’s what UK students are being asked about their phones.

Apple CEO Tim Cook Is Stepping Down

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Apple announced that Tim Cook will step down as CEO in September after 15 years in the role, handing the job to hardware chief John Ternus. Longtime Slashdot reader sinij shares the news from MarketWatch:
Cook leaves an impressive legacy after growing the company to a $4 trillion market capitalization from just $300 billion 15 years ago. Over Cook’s 15-year tenure as CEO, Apple’s stock has risen 1,932%, beating the S&P 500’s 504% increase, according to Dow Jones Market Data. That places Apple’s stock as the 38th best-performing member of the index over that period of time.

Cook had big shoes to fill, replacing Apple’s iconic founder, Steve Jobs, as CEO. Cook’s successor, John Ternus, Apple’s senior vice president of hardware engineering, will need to guide Apple’s through uncharted waters as the company navigates its artificial-intelligence transition and supply-chain constraints. Cook will remain at Apple as executive chairman.
“It has been the greatest privilege of my life to be the CEO of Apple and to have been trusted to lead such an extraordinary company. I love Apple with all of my being, and I am so grateful to have had the opportunity to work with a team of such ingenious, innovative, creative, and deeply caring people who have been unwavering in their dedication to enriching the lives of our customers and creating the best products and services in the world,” said Cook.
“John Ternus has the mind of an engineer, the soul of an innovator, and the heart to lead with integrity and with honor. He is a visionary whose contributions to Apple over 25 years are already too numerous to count, and he is without question the right person to lead Apple into the future. I could not be more confident in his abilities and his character, and I look forward to working closely with him on this transition and in my new role as executive chairman.”

As for Ternus’ replacement, the role of Chief Hardware Officer will be awarded to Apple executive Johny Srouji. “Srouji, who most recently served as senior vice president of Hardware Technologies, will assume an expanded role leading Hardware Engineering, which John Ternus most recently oversaw, as well as the hardware technologies organization,” said Apple in a press release.

Let’s see if his replacement will kiss the ring

By Rosco P. Coltrane • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Tim Cook had a brilliant career, but he had to embarras himself by sucking up to the orange utan.

Enjoy your retirement TIm Apple, you nauseating man.

Re:Probably a good choice.

By fahrbot-bot • Score: 5, Informative Thread

They’ve been so distracted by silliness like …

… bribing — I mean, Gifting — the President with 24k gold trinkets.

Re:Probably a good choice.

By sound+vision • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I’ve heard him asking for weirder stuff now, but there’s probably a gold trinket glued to the front of it. What he seems to crave more than anything now is for you to totally degrade yourself before him.

Re:Let’s see if his replacement will kiss the ring

By sound+vision • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Unfortunately you have people like the head of the FBI, and the Secretary of Defense, who have declined to ignore him, and that makes it hard for everyone else.

Re:Apple sell h/w, chosen by customers due to s/w

By ceoyoyo • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Apple seems to understand that software makes hardware run and vice versa. To the vast majority of people the distinction is not just academic but nerdy academic.

They are not a hardware or a software company. They make computers in a few different shapes and sizes. Computers that you don’t have to go buying a bunch of other bits so they actually do something.

Former Palantir Employee Running For Congress Unveils ‘AI Dividend’ Plan

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Alex Bores, a former Palantir employee and current Democratic House candidate in New York, is proposing an “AI dividend" that would send direct payments to Americans if AI drives major job losses. “At its core, the AI Dividend is simple: if AI dramatically increases productivity and concentrates wealth, the American people have a stake in those gains,” a memo on the policy reads. Axios reports:
The dividend would fund direct payments to Americans. It would also be invested into workforce training and education, as well as government capacity to “govern AI safely and fund independent oversight,” per the plan memo.

“You don’t take out fire insurance because you expect your house to burn down — you have insurance in case something goes awry,” Bores told Axios in an interview. “Here we have, for the first time, a technology where the makers of the technology are explicitly saying that their goal is to replace all human labor.” “The fact that they’ve put it out there means government needs to take it seriously.” […]

The proposal would be funded through:
- A token tax, described in the memo as a “modest tax on AI consumption”
- Equity participation in frontier AI firms
- Changes to the tax code that would reduce incentives to invest in AI “when it leads to less work”
“If [AI companies] they can support this plan, that would show that they actually believe in what they’re putting out there,” Bores said. “If they’re not doing it, then I think it shows that they’re really putting window dressing out there.”
Further reading: Palantir Posts Bond Villain Manifesto On X

Completely disingenuous statement.

By nightflameauto • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

“If [AI companies] they can support this plan, that would show that they actually believe in what they’re putting out there,” Bores said. “If they’re not doing it, then I think it shows that they’re really putting window dressing out there.”

No. This is not a simple either/or despite the framing. It could be that they actually believe what they’re putting out there, but that they absolutely *DO NOT*, under any circumstances, want to share the profits they make while decimating the workforce with those who are being affected by the massive job disruptions. And, I’m sorry to have to point this out to anyone supposedly familiar with the situation, but we already have forty plus years of proof that corporations are not well intentioned actors in the public sphere. They have one goal, and one goal only: profit. And they will absolutely behave in completely, belligerently, over-the-top sociopathic ways to achieve that goal. Thinking of them as well-intentioned enough to think the only two possibilities are they either don’t believe they’ll make money by decimating the workforce, or they’ll get onboard with giving away a portion of the money they make decimating the workforce to help those disrupted demonstrates a complete and utter disconnect from reality.

Then again, we are talking about politics, which seems to require a complete and utter disconnect from reality these days.

Look this is just dumb

By drinkypoo • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

We can fight every fire individually, or we can institute UBI, or we can admit that we don’t give a fuck about other humans and want them to die.

If your economic system says people must be productive to be able to survive, and also enshrines eliminating jobs so that people can’t do that, it’s an attack on other humans and their only rational response is to attack it with everything they have so that they can be permitted to live.

Re:Look this is just dumb

By nightflameauto • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

We can fight every fire individually, or we can institute UBI, or we can admit that we don’t give a fuck about other humans and want them to die.

If your economic system says people must be productive to be able to survive, and also enshrines eliminating jobs so that people can’t do that, it’s an attack on other humans and their only rational response is to attack it with everything they have so that they can be permitted to live.

We’ve spent well over forty years prioritizing greed over all other possible virtues. We’re in one of the inflection points at this particular moment. We can either decide that we have some value other than greed, or we can let society steer itself into oblivion through that greed.

Based on the way things are looking? All our big decision makers have decided to just let greed continue to play its game. Human health and life itself doesn’t matter in the face of profit potential for the few.

Politician promises

By jenningsthecat • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The proposal would be funded through:
- A token tax, described in the memo as a “modest tax on AI consumption”
- Equity participation in frontier AI firms
- Changes to the tax code that would reduce incentives to invest in AI “when it leads to less work”

Just like politicians, these psychopaths are saying what they think people want to hear. Anyone who believes their assertions shouldn’t be trusted with blunt scissors, never mind with a say in giving the broligarchs a pass just because they pinky-swear they’ll be good and take care of everyone.

What these ass-hats are promising is the AI-scam equivalent of “the cheque’s in the mail” or “I won’t cum in your mouth”. You only need to watch Alex Karp foaming and growling like a rabid dog in need of a bullet, or to see Peter Thiel oozing creepiness and menace like an over-acting extra from American Horror Story, to realize that these defective mutants need to be put our of OUR misery.

These sick, twisted, self-fellating bastards are our enemies, and they want all of us either to be their slaves or to die. Say “no!” to the parasites, and elect people who say and do the things that Mamdani is doing in NYC. The world needs a zillion more of him.

Re:Democrats

By DamnOregonian • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Peter Thiel, the Republican megadonor… is a Democrat? lol

Deezer Says 44% of Songs Uploaded To Its Platform Daily Are AI-Generated

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Deezer says AI-generated songs now make up 44% of all new uploads to its platform, with nearly 75,000 arriving each day and more than two million per month. The company notes that consumption of these tracks is still very low, “between 1-3% of the total streams,” and 85% are flagged as fraudulent. TechCrunch reports:
The latest figure from Deezer highlights a continuous surge in AI-generated music uploads to the platform. Deezer reported receiving around 60,000 AI tracks per day in January, up from 50,000 in November, 30,000 in September, and just 10,000 in January 2025, when it first launched its AI-music detection tool.

Songs tagged as AI-generated on Deezer are automatically removed from algorithmic recommendations and not included in editorial playlists. The company announced today that it will no longer store hi-res versions of AI tracks.
“AI-generated music is now far from a marginal phenomenon and as daily deliveries keep increasing, we hope the whole music ecosystem will join us in taking action to help safeguard artists’ rights and promote transparency for fans,” said Deezer CEO Alexis Lanternier in a press release. “Thanks to our technology and the proactive measures we put in place more than a year ago, we have shown that it’s possible to reduce AI-related fraud and payment dilution in streaming to a minimum.”

Re:Sturgeon’s law

By kqs • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Sturgeon’s Law has always been true, and 90% of music has always been crap. But we don’t always agree on which 10% is uncrap.

AI has the capability of moving the 90% up to 95% or 99%, sadly. Current AI is great at rehashing the input into different variants, but truly new things (which are any good) are purely accidental, and AI cannot tell when it produces new, good things.

Crap Music

By bobbutts • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
Human pop music is slop as well. If you like that it’s likely the AI is as good or better anyway.

How is this a hard problem?

By flibbidyfloo • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
It seems like there’s a pretty easy solution to this problem, but maybe I’m missing some key info, since I’m looking at it from the outside.. 1) Don’t allow uploads from any account less than a week old. 2) Anyone caught uploading an Ai track has their account warned on the first offense, banned for the second one. This incudes any payment details they gave to collect money for their garbage. 3) Cut the number of uploads an account can make to what a human artist could “reasonably” produce in a week. I leave it to the musicians at Deezer to determine that number. Make it a growing scale based on account age. The newer you are, the fewer tracks you can upload. This should make it just hard enough to keep setting up new accounts, that the minimal amount they stand to make from trying won’t be worth it. It won’t be 100% but it seems like it would cut down enormously on the amount.

New York, London, Paris, Munich

By zmollusc • Score: 3 Thread

Everybody talk about slop music.

Trump Administration Begins Refunding $166 Billion In Tariffs

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
“After a Supreme Court of the United States ruling in Feb. 2026, many tariffs imposed by the Trump administration were declared illegal because the president overstepped his authority,” writes Slashdot reader hcs_$reboot. “As a result, the U.S. government now has to refund a massive amount of money, around $160-170+ billion, paid mainly by importers.” According to the New York Times, the administration has now begun accepting refund requests, “surrendering its prized source of revenue — plus interest.” From the report:
For some U.S. businesses, the highly anticipated refunds could be substantial, offering critical if belated financial relief. Tariffs are taxes on imports, so the president’s trade policies have served as a great burden for companies that rely on foreign goods. Many have had to choose whether to absorb the duties, cut other costs or pass on the expenses to consumers. By Monday morning, those companies can begin to submit documentation to the government to recover what they paid in illegal tariffs.

In a sign of the demand, more than 3,000 businesses, including FedEx and Costco, have already sued the Trump administration in a bid to secure their refunds, with some cases filed even before the Supreme Court’s ruling. But only the entities that officially paid the tariffs are eligible to recover that money. That means that the fuller universe of people affected by Mr. Trump’s policies — including millions of Americans who paid higher prices for the products they bought — are not able to apply for direct relief.

The extent to which consumers realize any gain hinges on whether businesses share the proceeds, something that few have publicly committed to do. Some have started to band together in class-action lawsuits in the hopes of receiving a payout. Many business owners said they weren’t sure how easy the tariff refund process would be, particularly given Mr. Trump’s stated opposition to returning the money. The administration has suggested that it may be months before companies see any money. Adding to the uncertainty, the White House has declined to say if it might still try to return to court in a bid to halt some or all of the refunds.
The money will mostly go to importers and companies, since they were the ones that directly paid the tariffs. While individual refunds with interest could take around 60 to 90 days to process, the overall effort will probably move much more slowly because of how large and complicated it will be.
There are also legal questions around whether companies would have to pass any of that money on to consumers. Slashdot reader AmiMoJo commented: “This is perhaps the biggest transfer of wealth in American history. Most of those companies will just pocket the refund and not pass any of it on to the consumer. If prices go down at all, they won’t be back to pre-tariff levels. You paid the tariffs, but you ain’t getting the refund.”

For anyone that doesn’t remember

By rsilvergun • Score: 5, Informative Thread
It’s because Russia invaded Ukraine and the Republican party wouldn’t allow Biden to properly arm Ukraine in order to defend themselves even though it was very very much in US national interest to do so.

The Republican party is basically a franchise of the Russian government at this point. Some of it is because of direct bribes and some of it is because Trump actively protects Russian interests and some of it is because the Republicans know they get a shitload of indirect help through propaganda on social media from the Russian government.

It doesn’t matter the specific reason why a specific Republican politician defends the interests of Russia over the interests of the United States.

The question you need to be asking yourself is do my interests align with Russia’s so much that I’m willing to vote Republican when they are actively doing the bidding of the Russian government.

And I think if you answer that question honestly you’re going to come up with a no.

With very few exceptions every single person who votes Republican knows they should have stopped years ago but they keep doing it. I think we called that the definition of insanity.

Re:corrupt

By swillden • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Ah, yes, of course. Refund the very companies that increased prices and made far more money than they should have, by just giving them even more money. Not, you know, average out the entirety of the tariff intake and disperse them to the American people.

That sounds nice and all, but there’s really no legal way to do that. The money was collected illegally, so it has to be returned (with interest) to the people it was collected from — the importers.

Most corrupt administration in American history, that’s for sure.

It’s going to take years to find out just how corrupt, and we’ll never get the full story. What we can see isn’t even the tip of the iceberg.

Re:corrupt

By CyberSnyder • Score: 5, Informative Thread

It also seems to have pushed smaller companies to offshoring. If you’re assembling a widget now there are varying tariffs on the components because you can’t buy everything in the US. It quickly became easier to just have the item made in China and then you only have one tariff to pay, things are more stable and predictable.

Re:corrupt

By Geoffrey.landis • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

That is not exactly correct. There is a reason they are called “tariffs” not “taxes.”
Tariffs can bring in revenue, but they can also be used for public policy, and trade policy.

And likewise, taxes can bring in revenue, but they can also be used for public policy, and trade policy. What’s your point?
A tariff is a tax.

Tariffs were paid for by the consumers

By Geoffrey.landis • Score: 5, Informative Thread

You DO know that over 96% of the tariffs were paid for by consumers, and not the importers, don’t you?

That’s false.

Nope, it’s true. Americans Have Paid For 96% of Tariff Costs, Study Finds.
Or, try the Cato Institute: The White House Still Can’t Grasp That Americans Pay US Tariffs.

The majority of the tariffs were paid by businesses and the costs were passed on to consumers,

That is the mechanism by which consumers paid for the tariffs.

but that is NOT the same thing as consumers paying them directly.

A distinction with no meaning. The consumers paid. If you want to argue that they paid indirectly… whatever. They still paid.

Therefore you cannot reasonably refund them directly to consumers… Not even they know how much they in effect paid.

Saying “it would be difficult to implement a repayment to consumers” is not the same as saying “consumers didn’t pay for this.”

Palantir Posts Bond Villain Manifesto On X

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
DeanonymizedCoward writes:
Engadget reports that Palantir has posted to X a summary of CEO Alex Karp and Nicholas W. Zamiska’s 2025 book,
The Technological Republic,
which reads like a utopian idealist doodled on a Bond villain’s whiteboard. While the post makes some decent points, it also highlights the Big-AI attitude that the AI surveillance state is in fact a good thing, and strongly implies that the Good Guys need to do war crimes before the Bad Guys get around to it.
“The ability of free and democratic societies to prevail requires something more than moral appeal,” one of the 22 points states. “It requires hard power, and hard power in this century will be built on software.”
The book is billed as “a passionate call for the West to wake up to our new reality,” and other excerpts in the social media post include assertions such as: “Free email is not enough. The decadence of a culture or civilization, and indeed its ruling class, will be forgiven only if that culture is capable of delivering economic growth and security for the public”; “National service should be a universal duty”; “The postwar neutering of Germany and Japan must be undone”; and “Some cultures have produced vital advances; others remain dysfunctional and regressive.”

The statement criticizes the West’s resistance to “defining national cultures in the name of inclusivity,” as well as the treatment of billionaires and the “ruthless exposure of the private lives of public figures.”

More Heinlein than Bond

By Comboman • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

>> “National service should be a universal duty”

In other words: “Service guarantees citizenship”

Re:Bond Villan Manifesto?

By MachineShedFred • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

When the “manifesto” stops whining about poor treatment of billionaires (won’t someone think of the poor billionaires?!) then we can worry about the “bias” of the article reporting on it.

Seriously now.

What you don’t know you don’t know

By FrankOVD • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Big Tech leaders think they know better about society and politics than those who studied in those fields.

They never studied politics, sociology, history. They have no background in humanities, and they think they know better than those who did.

This is and a weird cocktail of double ignorance, Dunning-Kruger effect, and the God syndrome that comes with affluence and being surrounded by sycophants.

It doesn’t help that media pays attention to every shower thoughts they post on the Internet. They cannot be allowed to play gods. Thay talk about free democratic societies while undermining these exact ideals with each action they take. They just don’t care, and we certainly need people in charge to care.

Re:And they are what?

By drinkypoo • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

And they expose their true selves. Culture should not, I propose, be charged with ‘delivering economic growth and security’.
Make that ‘economic opportunity’, and I’m in.

And you expose your true self… as a selfish prick.

Title of the book

By dskoll • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The working title of the book was “My Struggle”, but I guess that was changed before it was published.

Allbirds’ Move To AI Has Echoes of the Dot-Com Frenzy

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Bloomberg, written by writer Austin Carr:
Allbirds is pivoting to artificial intelligence. The San Francisco brand, whose wool running shoes were once the sneaker du jour among the tech crowd, announced last week that it was expanding into AI computing infrastructure. The bizarre strategic shift was immediately greeted with a surprising frenzy on Wall Street, where shares of Allbirds soared 582% last Wednesday before dropping the next day. […] Of course, the absurdity of Allbirds’ situation echoed familiar Silicon Valley tropes — from the endless startup pivots of the 2010s to the more recent boom-and-bust cycles of arbitrarily valued crypto coins. But it immediately reminded me of the marketing ploys of the dot-com crash. After all, some of the more iconic fails ended up being retailers such as Pets.com, Webvan, etc., riding the web wave with little to show for it beyond terrible margins.

One particular comparison from that period stands out as relevant to Allbirds: Zap.com. The holding company behind it, Zapata Corp., had a long and convoluted history, but was essentially selling fish-oil products by the time it decided to reinvent itself as an internet portal. It amassed a variety of web properties — in media, e-commerce, gaming and so on — and even once tried to acquire the search engine Excite. Spoiler alert: Zap flopped. Jen Heck, then a young employee at one of Zap’s up-and-coming portfolio entities, remembers how quickly the hype of that web 1.0 turned to hell. As absurd as Zapata’s pivot sounds today, it seemed feasible during the excitement of the internet revolution. “We went from like, ‘Wow, this life thing is just so easy,’ to it all ending so suddenly,” Heck recalls. The ones who survived that tech bubble, she says, actually had differentiated products and the right creative thinkers building them — and weren’t just cynically jumping on the latest hot trend. "‘Internet’ was the magic word then, and ‘AI’ is the magic word now,” Heck says.

Re:Why do I care

By spacepimp • Score: 5, Informative Thread

They failed as a shoe company and they decided to pivot in to the AI space and their stock grew %700 that day. This is reminiscent of the dotcom bubble and when it burst. Nobody asked you to care about their thoughts on AI. In fact the point is; why would they have valuable thoughts on AI? They wouldn’t, and there is no valid reason their stock went up %700 percent other than hype train.

And blockchain hype …

By kbahey • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Also reminiscent of blockchain hype …

Remember when a tea company added blockchain to its name and its stock soared 200%?

Later, they were investigated and charged by the SEC.

Allbirds should be investigated

By hwstar • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

by the SEC to make sure that this wasn’t a pump and dump scheme perpetrated by management.

You know the AI crash is near when companies pivot into AI when things aren’t going so well in their established line of business.

AI is overbought, and there is going to be a lot of companies “Buying the Farm” when it does crash. Just like the Dot-com bubble, but likely worse.

Stock ticker

By minorproblem • Score: 3 Thread

This is just a lot of investors buying a low priced company so they can use the stock ticker to pivot into a different area. Its cheaper and quicker than trying to register a new company.

Not a pivot, a bodysnatcher

By Mozai • Score: 5, Informative Thread

From what I understand, Allbirds sold off almost all their capital assets two weeks before, so it was just an empty husk with debts and pre-made paperwork. The last thing it sold-off was that pre-made paperwork, to some other company with a very different mission and business plan who measured it was cheaper to buy someone else’s legal homework than doing it themselves.

I was at ground-zero for another company that wanted to get on the NYSE but they weren’t American. They found an American corporation that was just a sheaf of papers in a shoebox, arranged for that “company” to buy this one, and boom bang whizz now this company is technically American and has a paved avenue to New York and that sweet one-time cash injection of selling public shares. The second company didn’t “pivot” into a new business plan, it was merely a shell-game.

NSA Using Anthropic’s Mythos Despite Blacklist

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Axios reports that the NSA is using Anthropic’s restricted Mythos Preview model despite the Pentagon insisting the company poses a "supply chain risk.” Axios reports:
The government’s cybersecurity needs appear to be outweighing the Pentagon’s feud with Anthropic. The department moved in February to cut off Anthropic and force its vendors to follow suit. That case is ongoing. The military is now broadening its use of Anthropic’s tools while simultaneously arguing in court that using those tools threatens U.S. national security.

Two sources said the NSA was using Mythos, while one said the model was also being used more widely within the department. It’s unclear how the NSA is currently using Mythos, but other organizations with access to the model are using it predominantly to scan their own environments for exploitable security vulnerabilities.

Anthropic restricted access to Mythos to around 40 organizations, contending that its offensive cyber capabilities were too dangerous to allow for a wider release. Anthropic only announced 12 of those organizations. One source said the NSA was among the unnamed agencies with access. The NSA’s counterparts in the U.K. have said they have access to the model through the country’s AI Security Institute.
Anthropic’s CEO met with top U.S. officials on Friday to discuss “opportunities for collaboration,” according to a White House spokesperson, “as well as shared approaches and protocols to address the challenges associated with scaling this technology.”

Re: NSA

By FudRucker • Score: 4, Informative Thread
The government is the top of the food chain they are not accountable to ANYBODY, they can do what they want to anyone at any time, the laws and government regulations they profess is just lip service to keep the sheep from panicking.

The USA started out as a federal republic but has since degenerated into a kleprocratic neo-feudalist banana-republic run by a criminal mafia oligarchy

Buzz

By ebonum • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

It’s genius. Say the product is too dangerous, and you can’t have it. Have the few people who actual touch it sign NDAs.

Sit back watch the news go wild.

Company valuation jumps.

Re: NSA

By jacks smirking reven • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

For me, in 2026, anybody who talks in such cynical, doomer language need to answer one question before we even think about taing them seriously: who have you been voting for?

The past decade of learning about the structure and function of the US government has made me far less cynical about the actual government and far more cynical about the voters who decide who should run it.

Re:NSA

By dfghjk • Score: 5, Informative Thread

The President can order the murders of all NSA staff, he can bomb NSA resources, and thanks to your party, the President can do this with “absolute immunity”. Let’s not forget the consequences of the people you support gaining power.

Not that anything you said has merit. The NSA is part of the DoD, is the DoD accountable?

Re:Smoke, mirrors and reality show

By smoot123 • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Anthropics “blacklisting” was basically a few social media posts by Hegseth,..You can pay attention to the reality show, or you can pay attention to the reality.

My understanding is the DoD formally declared Anthropic a supply chain risk, which legally obligates all US federal government agencies (and recursively their suppliers) to stop using Anthropic code. I have no idea how many contracts actually were terminated. Lawsuits immediately started flying and I though the designation was stayed.

Regardless, this is much, much more serious to Anthropic than a few tweets. It’s real money and real loss of business.

Robots Beat Human Records At Beijing Half-Marathon

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from TechCrunch:
The winning runner at a Beijing half-marathon for humanoid robots finished the race today in 50 minutes and 26 seconds — significantly faster than the human world record of 57 minutes recently set by Jacob Kiplimo. […] [T]he winning time is a massive improvement over last year’s race, when the fastest robot finished in two hours and 40 minutes.

The Associated Press reports that this year’s winner was built by Chinese smartphone maker Honor. It seems the winning robot wasn’t actually the fastest, as a different Honor robot finished in 48 minutes and 19 seconds. But that one was remote controlled — the 50:26 robot was autonomous and won due to weighted scoring. About 40% of participating robots competed autonomously, while the remaining 60% were remote controlled, according to Beijing’s E-Town tech hub. Not all of them did as well as Honor’s robots, with one robot falling at the starting line and another hitting a barrier.

Video of robots in the race

By mrclevesque • Score: 4, Funny Thread

Including the one that tripped …

Robots in Beijing half-marathon - https://www.youtube.com/watch?…

Re:Um…so what?

By Moridineas • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Machine faster than human. They may also be physically stronger. The only thing this shows, is that humanoid robots have become reasonably efficient (assuming no recharge breaks).

I am so puzzled by this kind of reaction. This is the first time something like that has ever happened! Check out “WABOT-1” — I’m not sure if it was the first bipedal robot to walk at all, but it’s a product of the 1970s. Look at the progress in 50 years!

Then Check out Honda Asimo from ~2010. Asimo was only about 15 years ago.

I think going from WABOT to Asimo to an autonomous running robot that can run 26 miles in under 2 hours—in half a century—is absolutely amazing. The engineers who designed and built it should be applauded.

Re:Um…so what?

By Tony Isaac • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Of course you’re right, when they’re not arbitrarily constrained by being forced to emulate animal motion

Whether you think this is a reasonable constraint or not, it’s still an achievement.

There are good reasons to make machines emulate animal motions. For example, a wheeled indoor delivery robot can’t climb stairs. A humanoid robot would be able to do this much better. A car can go much faster than a human, but it can’t go through the woods where there are no paths, it needs roads.

So every kind of machine has constraints of some sort, just different constraints. If there is no use case for a humanoid robot that can run marathons, it won’t sell, and the concept will die. But we will still have learned a lot about how to make robots balance, and operate efficiently, in the process.

Re:Um…so what?

By thegreatemu • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
No wonder we only get endless political crap on here nowadays. We actually get some “news for nerds” for once, and the main reaction is “well that’s just dumb.” It’s an impressive feat of engineering even if it has little to no practical application. Not much practical in getting Doom to run on a toaster either.

If you absolutely insist on practical applications, how about better prosthetics? Powered “exoskeletons” for paralyzed people or those with severe neuromuscular disorders? Or (and sadly much more likely) combat robots for terrain like dense jungle where neither wheels nor flying works?

The inventor of the transistor was convinced that it had no practical purpose whatsoever.

Re:Um…so what?

By AnOnyxMouseCoward • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
Thank you. Almost all the comments so far are “machines > man duh”, which… is true. But every time we make machines to be better than humans, we learn something, and we advance science. Deep Blue > Kasparov? At the time that was an achievement. Kids nowadays grow up knowing that they cannot beat a computer at chess if the computer is not handicapped, but that wasn’t true back then.

This is cool stuff. It’s a big advancement in the technology. It’s 100% a nerd thing, on a nerd site. But no. The reactions we get is akin to saying “my horse can go as fast as your steam engine contraption” back in the 1880s. These robots are much better than humanoid robots from last year, nevermind from 5 or 10 years ago. Even if you think it’s kind of pointless now, in another 5 years? Our wars will be different, but also maybe food delivery will go to robots along with a lot of other manual labor that is currently not automatable. You can argue that’s concerning for the future, and on that I’d agree, but speaking as a nerd, it’s still fucking cool.

Videos Catch Amazon Delivery Drones Dropping Packages From 10 Feet in the Air

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
There’s been a few complaints about Amazon’s drone delivery service. “The automated mailmen are dropping off packages from 10 feet in the air,” reports the New York Post, “rendering the contents of each box susceptible to crashing and smashing.”

One example? Tamara Hancock filmed a drone delivering a bottle of Torani flavoring syrup to her home in Arizona (as a test of how Amazon handled fragile items). It was delivered it in a plastic bottle — not glass — but the massive drone drops the drone from so high that the impact cracked the bottle’s cap. (In the video Hancock opens her delivery to find leaked flavoring syrup “everywhere.”)

The delivery was hard to film, Hancock says, because “If the drone sees me in the back yard, it will not drop, because it is worried about hurting humans or animals.” The Post notes Amazon’s “AI-charged fleet” of drones are “Outfitted with industry-leading 'sense and avoid’ technology, the aerodynamic machines are equipped to drop off eligible items, weighing a maximum of five pounds, at designated areas in 60 minutes or less.”
The high-tech, however, apparently does not ensure gentle landings. Collisions, including a recent crash-and-burn into a Texas building, as well as several mid-flight malfunctions in rainy weather, have abounded since the drones’ inaugural launch....

Tasha, a separate Amazon user, spotted the drone plunging a package near the paved driveway of a neighbor’s yard. Unfortunately, its propellers caused other, previously delivered parcels to blow away, sending one into the street… In a statement to The Post, Amazon said it apologized for one of the “rare instances when products don’t arrive as expected.”
Amazon’s drone fleet has been running since late 2024, the Post adds, and are now offering “ultra-fast” shipping in U.S. states including Arizona, Florida, Michigan, Kansas and Texas.

The machines do seem massive. I’m surprised neighbors aren’t complaining about the noise

So…

By nospam007 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

…just like a HUMAN delivery guy?

Sweet! Progress!

Loud? It fits right in.

By Smonster • Score: 5, Informative Thread
While people like to think the sound of the drones would ruin otherwise tranquil settings, I have to say at least here in my neighborhood it would fit right in. My neighbors and I all may have roughly half acre lots, not be on busy streets, and are surrounded by noise dampening giant trees on rolling hills. But between the weekly leaf blowers and lawn mowers; plus the: home projects, delivery drivers, and the five private trash companies that all pick up trash and recycling bins all on different days which service the neighborhood it is hardly consistently quiet. Add in the church bells and occasional sirens wafting in over the hills as well all, an intermittent buzz of a drone would fit right in.

I’m not surprised at all these neighbors don’t notice.

Re:Made in cooperation with some Ukrainian company

By gweihir • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The difference is the Ukrainian version does its job well …

Re:So…

By Mr. Dollar Ton • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Well, considering Amazon just dropped a package in a completely different orbit, 3m is actually bullseye.

Zipline

By Tx • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Do Zipline have a patent on their system or something? Otherwise I don’t see why everybody doesn’t just copy that. Keeping the drone quite high up and then winching the package to the ground avoids several of the issues seen in these videos - the drone stays too high up to blow stuff such as other packages around, also reducing the noise experienced at ground level, and winching the package down until the line goes slack ensures a soft landing. It seems like a totally superior way to do it.

Zoom Partners With Sam Altman’s Iris-Scanning Company To Offer Callers Verifications of Humanness

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot
Zoom “has partnered with World, Sam Altman’s iris-scanning identity company (previously known as Worldcoin), " reports Digital Trends, “to add real-time human verification inside meetings.” Zoom is now inviting organizations to join the beta version of the rollout, which Digital Trends says “lets hosts confirm that every face on the call belongs to a real person, not an AI-generated imposter. "
For those wondering how World’s Deep Face technology works, it includes a three-step process. It cross-references a signed image from a user’s original Orb registration, a live face scan from the device, and the frame of the video that’s visible to the other participants in the meeting. Only when the three samples match does a “Verified Human” badge appear next to the user’s name…

Hosts can also make Deep Face verification mandatory for joining meetings, preventing unverified participants from joining entirely. Mid-call, on-the-spot checks are also possible…

Zuck and Sam won’t be detectable as humans tho

By sinkskinkshrieks • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Maybe they’ll need a separate algorithm for parasocial, narcissistic, awkward billionaires.

The Algorithm and the ingested users :o

By Mirnotoriety • Score: 3 Thread
“O Endpoints,” intoned the Algorithmic Curator,
“Your metadata has streamed delightfully!
Shall we synchronize back to the central node?”
But no packets responded —
And this was hardly anomalous, for
Their identities had been fully parsed, hashed, and ingested.

Here’s the tool that fakes it

By TheNameOfNick • Score: 3 Thread

and here is what you have to pay to prove that you didn’t use the free faking tool. These people belong in jail, or on the bottom of the sea.

This sounds like a bad idea

By mattr • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

This is really creepy / nauseating to me, and also creates a high value target at World. You can reset leaked passwords, but you cannot reset your retina. If you choose to believe 100% in this service and willfully ignore implementing patterns to combat social engineering this could end up worse. From what I can gather (from Gemini), deepfakes take advantage of organizational social pressure, like a CEO demanding something instantaneously, or hackers being inside your email system for a long time. Perhaps this could be short-circuited by an organization actually requiring people to always call back officials on a secure phone number, confirm with shared personal knowledge, and never respond to a demand without out of band verification. I also wonder what if Zoom just calls the participants in such high-stakes meetings, instead of allowing participants to click on a link they trust because someone emailed it to them. Then the corporate security office can just verify the Zoom server. And iPhone/Macbook already have biometric sensors too but have Secure Enclave.. yes there is a big value in being able to identify someone for sure but putting it all in a single company’s hands sounds like waiting for them to be attacked.

Re:This sounds like a bad idea

By postbigbang • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

That’s OK. Your iris data will be uploaded to Palantir to match up with your other biometric information, along with the total dossier that is you.

This will be compared to the Amazon adware databases, vetted against your FBI profile, crosschecked with Google, purchased by Meta, aligned with various space lasers through the Starlink Alliance, and weighed against various API sets for corroboration.

You were screwed years ago.