Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Australia To Let Social Media Users ‘Opt Out’ of Algorithm-Based Feeds
  2. A Secret New Elizabeth Holmes Documentary Stuns Telluride
  3. LG TVs Caught Spying Even When Offline or On Standby
  4. Google DeepMind Publishes AI-Powered Predictions For Effect of All 9 Billion Mutations to Human DNA
  5. Teen Reading Slumps to Worst This Century Due to Surge in Screen Time
  6. Secretive DHS ‘Predictive Policing’ Unit Is Analyzing Americans’ Financial Habits, Pulling Them Over
  7. AMD Working To ‘Push Rust Deep into the GPU Stack’
  8. Three Cities, 16 Years And $1 Billion Later, ‘Defiant’ Lucas Museum of Narrative Art Opens To Mixed Reviews
  9. Why Google Told Drivers to Drive a Longer Way On Purpose
  10. Does Brave Browser Load Faster Than Chrome, Firefox, and Microsoft Edge?
  11. Switzerland’s Federal Government Tests Open-Source Alternatives to Microsoft on 3,000 Computers
  12. Instead of Fighting AI, Some Teachers Work It Into Their Lessons
  13. A Man Charged His EV at a Dealership - and Was Billed $418
  14. ‘She Lost Her Sight. Her Billionaire Father Bet On a Daring New Treatment.’
  15. ‘The Jobs Apocalypse Is Postponed. An AI Jobs Boom Is Here’

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Australia To Let Social Media Users ‘Opt Out’ of Algorithm-Based Feeds

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Australia is proposing the "My Feed, My Way" initiative that would force social media platforms to let users over 16 turn off algorithmic recommendations and instead see only posts from people and creators they follow. Platforms that fail to comply could face fines of up to $79 million. CNBC reports:
The legislation, which is being drafted and released Tuesday for targeted consultation, would require platforms to send notifications to new and existing users so they can choose their default feed. […] The measures, set to be introduced to the Parliament of Australia this year, will also require AI chatbots, online games and other digital services to take action to protect under-18s from addictive design features.
“This is not about giving government control. It’s about giving people control. It’s about putting choice back into the hands of Australians online,” said Prime Minister Anthony at a press conference on Tuesday.

“This is sensible, pragmatic, practical reform. It gives users choice, and it will hold the big tech companies responsible for inaction.”

clueless

By flippy • Score: 3 Thread
When will politicians realize that fines like $79 million are rounding errors to these companies? It’s not a fine, it’s a cost of doing business to them. Because of that, even if this passes it will be useless.

A Secret New Elizabeth Holmes Documentary Stuns Telluride

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from TechCrunch:
Telluride just managed one of its best-kept secrets in years, per The Hollywood Reporter. On Sunday night, festival-goers filed into a 650-seat theater with their phones locked away, having no idea what they were about to see, told only that it ran nearly three hours, hadn’t been shown anywhere, and that its principal creators would be in the audience. The surprise premiere they went on to enjoy is a new documentary from co-directors Nathan Fielder and Lance Oppenheim about Theranos founder Elizabeth Holmes.

Called “You Can See Everything,” the film is said to capture Holmes and her husband, Billy Evans, in the 34 days before she reported to federal prison in May 2023 to begin an 11-year sentence for defrauding investors about her blood-testing technology. Since then, her legal fight has limped along without success. Her appeals to overturn the conviction and shorten her sentence were rejected in February of last year. She then went a different route last year, asking President Trump to commute her sentence. That clemency petition is still listed as pending, meaning it’s officially been opened and remains under review.

Fielder apparently lived in the couple’s guest house during filming — the access they provided sounds shocking — but some of the buzz also ties to an A-list actress who becomes part of the story itself. A24 is set to release the film in October.
You can watch a trailer for the film on YouTube.

Were people allowed to walk out?

By Fly Swatter • Score: 3 Thread
Because that would be the sane thing to do, don’t give crooks and liars publicity.

Re:Couldn’t imagine…

By alvinrod • Score: 4, Informative Thread
Do you regularly go to film festivals? The people who regularly do are the sort of people who tend to follow the industry closely and know a lot about upcoming films in much the same way that posters here follow rumors about unreleased tech products. For them the prospect of being one of a few hundred people who get to screen something that no one else has seen before or even heard about is going to be an alluring proposition, in much the same way that plenty of people here would jump at the opportunity to beta test some secret new tech product that’s been kept under wraps during development. Maybe it will be a waste of time, but the potential is what draws us in.

Re: It’s just like The Osbornes!

By ThurstonMoore • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

It’s called a Slashvertisment, someone paid for this shit “story” to be here. If it wasn’t we’d know the mystery actress by the end of the summary.

A clear case of fictional prescience :o

By Mirnotoriety • Score: 4, Informative Thread
Hawaii Five-O S01E19 (1969): Medical quack Dr. Fremont claims to have a machine that detects disease from a single blood drop. McGarrett swaps out the blood sample for vegetable oil exposing her as a fraud.

LG TVs Caught Spying Even When Offline or On Standby

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
A Gamers Nexus investigation found that LG smart TVs are almost constantly logging and uploading data about owners and their homes, even while they are offline or in standby mode. “The company’s TV sets scan Wi-Fi networks for nearby devices, record audio logs through their microphones, and use audio and video sampling to recognize exactly what you’re watching from across the TV inputs,” reports The Verge. From the report:
Gamers Nexus partnered with fellow YouTubers Level1Techs and independent security researchers for the investigation, which involved testing retail LG OLEDs. Packet captures showed the TVs scanning the local area network for nearby hardware like phones or smartwatches, as well as logging location data and details of nearby Wi-Fi networks, and feeding the information back to LG Ad Solutions. Perhaps more concerningly, the TVs were capable of recording microphone audio when in standby; this continued even after the TV was disconnected from the internet, with audio files stored offline and uploaded once a connection was restored.
Earlier this year, LG was found to be silently installing an adware-like app on Windows PCs that ran pop-up ads for other LG apps and even McAfee antivirus.

Water is wet

By blackomegax • Score: 3, Insightful Thread
you didn’t really think that TV was worth $199 for 75” of 4K HDR?

Re:Nope

By JaredOfEuropa • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
Until they get an edge TPU to process the locally gathered data and send the results (now much reduced in size compared to the raw data) to the mothership, using 4G/5G. Like modern cars are already doing.

Re:Water is wet

By dmomo • Score: 4, Informative Thread

That doesn’t mean drawing outrage and attention to it isn’t useful. If bad corporate behavior isn’t verified and amplified, no action will be taken against it.

Google DeepMind Publishes AI-Powered Predictions For Effect of All 9 Billion Mutations to Human DNA

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Google DeepMind has released AlphaGenome Atlas, a free research database containing AI-generated predictions for the effects of all 9 billion possible single-letter mutations in the human genome. Built from its AlphaGenome model, the atlas is designed to help scientists interpret both protein-coding and harder-to-understand regulatory DNA. Fortune reports:
AlphaGenome Atlas, as DeepMind calls the database, is a precomputed catalogue of what each substitution of a single DNA base is likely to do to the machinery that switches genes on and off. Until now researchers had to run such a model one variant at a time or had to test variants in the laboratory, a process that was painstakingly slow. It would have taken many human lifetimes to discover the consequences of all 9 billion possible single-letter mutations. The Atlas promises to make the job of biologists and medical researchers considerably easier, potentially speeding up the understanding of genetic diseases and the hunt for possible cures.

Pushmeet Kohli, DeepMind’s vice president for research and head of its AI for science team, told reporters on a briefing call that this was the first time any researcher in the world could reach a comprehensive map of human genetic variation “by simply opening a browser.” Kohli also framed the release as helping to complete the unfinished business of the Human Genome Project, which in 2003 succeeded in mapping the entire human DNA sequence. “As the saying goes, we bought the book,” he said, “but we did not understand how to read it.”

Atlas is available for non-commercial use from today through a website Google DeepMind has set up for it. The company said it would be available for commercial use through a licensing arrangement through Google Cloud “soon.” Kohli said that Google DeepMind’s sister company,ÂIsomorphic Labs, which is using AI for drug discovery, would have access to Atlas but that it would also require a commercial license for access. He did not specify exactly what the terms would be for commercial licensing. A paper describing the Atlas and how it was created is being released on bioRxiv, a repository for biomedical preprint academic papers.

Sadly 10 Billion of them

By Growlley • Score: 3 Thread
turn you into Aqua Man.

Best guess != labwork

By pla • Score: 3 Thread

this was the first time any researcher in the world could reach a comprehensive map of human genetic variation “by simply opening a browser.”

Not quite. This is the first time any researcher in the world can get an AI’s best guess as to what each single substitution might do. All that “painfully slow” research of testing actual variants in the lab is, by contrast, real data.

Don’t get me wrong, this is very, very cool, and will almost certainly lead to a lot of new discoveries - Along with a lot of false positives and dead-ends. I’m not even an AI hater, despite having serious reservations about alignment. This, however, is exactly the type of inquiry where AI hallucinates the worst: An open-ended “what if” question where the answer isn’t allowed to be “I don’t know”.

Here’s a quick sanity check every one of us should do occasionally - Go ask ChatGPT a subtle open-ended “why” question in your own field of expertise… And have a good laugh at how hilariously wrong the answer is.

Teen Reading Slumps to Worst This Century Due to Surge in Screen Time

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Teen reading, math, and science scores have fallen to their lowest levels since international PISA testing began in 2000, with 15-year-olds now reading at roughly the level previously expected of students a year younger. The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) linked weaker results to more screen time, less reading for pleasure, and digital distraction. It also found that students who regularly used AI chatbots for tasks like drafting essays and summarizing text scored about 20 points lower in science, roughly equivalent to a year of learning. Reuters reports:
A 2012 reading high of 501 on PISA’s index had declined to a score of 466 last year. The test is widely regarded as the world’s leading gauge of educational performance and its results are closely scrutinized by governments and educators. “In reading, more screen time and less reading for pleasure have gone hand in hand with weaker results,” OECD head Mathias Cormann told a press conference. “We’re also seeing more hasty reading, students rushing through a text and giving a quick wrong answer.”

Reading scores fell more sharply in students from better-off backgrounds, the study added. Hindered by falling reading standards, average teenage science and maths skills were also at their lowest this century. Science fell from a 2009 high of 506 on the index to 486, while maths was down from 502 to 469 in the same period. East Asia was the best-performing region. Chinese cities that participated in the test, Japan, Korea, Singapore and Taiwan had the best educational systems with Britain and Estonia the only countries outside the region that made it into the top 10 in reading, mathematics and science.

School Requirements

By JBMcB • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
My son went through high school having been assigned a total of three whole-book reading assignments. Most of his reading assignments were newspaper articles, short stories, or single chapters of books. When I went to high school, I was expected to read at least two books every summer, then several more per English class.

It’s a choice made by teachers. My younger daughter had one teacher had her class read four books throughout the year. It was middle school, so they were shorter young adult books, but she had read more than my son did throughout all of high school in one class.

British news is slightly different

By mccalli • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
I’m British, and have been following this from the other side of the story. In the UK it’s more fragmented - this year England is up, but Scotland and Wales are down and in some cases quite significantly. Wales seems to have taken a hell of a hit in reading for instance.

It’s better news in maths and science but we’re still behind where we were five-seven years ago except for science. Definitely a mixed bag, though all improvements are welcome of course.

Parents need to instill a love of reading

By sarren1901 • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Parents must be an active participant in teaching their children to read. This starts with reading to them and then teaching them how to read. Pre-school helps here as well, but if the parents themselves are not readers, then its pretty likely the child won’t really become one either. My mom use to take me to the library at least once a month but probably twice as I think the borrowing of book was only two or three weeks at a time. Of course, if you were actively reading you could get through a book a week.

I’m really glad I didn’t have video games or cellphones before I learned to read. By the time I got my first nintendo, I was already fulling into reading. I even loved the RPG games because of all the reading.

I don’t envy parents in this society at all. They have so many unnecessary distractions being pitted against them by our society. Society may be moving forward technologically but I’m not sure that’s the same as progress.

Re:School Requirements

By CubicleZombie • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

They should let kids choose their own books to read. If I hadn’t discovered the sci-fi aisle at the library on my own, Of Mice and Men in 12th grade would have been the last book I ever read. Kids should learn that reading is fun when they’re not doing it for a grade.

Out of sight, out of mind?

By the_skywise • Score: 3 Thread

With books, like music, becoming more and more of a digital thing and no physical presence, the whole culture of reading is dying off. Teens aren’t seeing other teens read (no books in hands), there’s few bookstores around to hang out in to discover the books and with most information online there’s no need to go to a physical library.

Schools can only do so much to force reading with assignments. Without building the habit of reading books for pleasure outside of school there’s no way to turn this around.

Secretive DHS ‘Predictive Policing’ Unit Is Analyzing Americans’ Financial Habits, Pulling Them Over

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from 404 Media:
Border Patrol is running secretive predictive policing units that analyze Americans’ financial activity and other data, then feed that intelligence to local police who pull people over who are not suspected of any specific crime, but which the government thinks may be worth searching, 404 Media has found. The units, the name of which 404 Media is revealing here for the first time, are called Predictive Intelligence Targeting Teams (PITT). In one case, a PITT analyzed the financial activity of a man who was driving across Montana, and local authorities stopped him under the pretense of an obstructed license plate and charged him with a DUI.

404 Media identified one PITT in the Spokane Sector, Washington, which polices the U.S. border with Canada, and another in the Laredo Sector, Texas, which polices the border with Mexico. The findings add to an Associated Press investigation from last year which found Border Patrol was using automatic license plate readers (ALPRs) as part of the same wide-spanning predictive policing program. “The bottom line is genuine probable cause cannot be synthetically generated,” Jake Laperruque, deputy director of the Security and Surveillance Project at the Center For Democracy & Technology, told 404 Media in an email. Here Border Patrol seems to be “using parallel construction to cloak the reason behind its car stops in secrecy. If we can’t meaningfully review and evaluate these systems, we can’t trust them,” he added.

[…] The DHS document obtained by 404 Media shows that Border Patrol is analyzing the financial activity of Americans to find people to pull over. The Associated Press’s investigation found the predictive policing program is also heavily using ALPRs to track potential targets’ movements. It is not clear how exactly Border Patrol is monitoring Americans’ financial activity. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) declined to answer what financial activity the agency was monitoring, and whether it obtained a warrant or not.
A CBP spokesperson told 404 Media in an email: “U.S. Border Patrol uses intelligence-informed analysis and planning to support national security operations, allocate resources, and help identify potential threats and bad actors to public safety. These efforts are conducted consistent with applicable law, policy, privacy protections, and oversight requirements.”
The statement continued: “For operational security reasons, we do not discuss specific analytical methods, data sources, targeting criteria, investigative techniques, system capabilities, or deployment details. Public disclosure of such information could compromise law enforcement operations and investigations as well as creating safety risks for agents and the public.”

Rob Frommer, senior attorney at the Institute for Justice, told 404 Media: “The government’s increasing use of mass surveillance — whether that surveillance comes via ALPRs, financial records, or the like — coupled with predictive policing is a recipe for tyranny. We fought a revolution for the idea that we are citizens, not subjects. Yet schemes like CBP’s Predictive Intelligence Targeting Team treat all Americans as if they are potential suspects. This is not just wrong, it’s unconstitutional, and IJ will keep pushing courts and Congress to end this attack on Americans’ security.”

99% probably

By BytePusher • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
They’re looking for cash withdrawals and gold purchases. This is related to civil asset forfeiture and they’re looking to improve their profit margins. The argument will be that they suspect people who carry large stores of physical value are involved in trading drugs, guns, tax evasion or terrorism. Won’t you all think of the children?

Re: Wouldn’t any judge throw out every case?

By reanjr • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

The whole point of parallel construction is that you find alternative legal bases for bringing in evidence. The fact that the officers can’t be trusted has little impact on the evidence being admissable and damning.

“I’ve done nothing wrong, I don’t care it.”

By gurps_npc • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

This is another nail in the “I’ve done nothing wrong, let them look” argument.

The question is not whether you’ve done anything wrong, but whether the government has done anything wrong. When they refuse to disclose their methodology they are ALWAYS doing something wrong.

The entire point of a free society is that we do not have to nor can we trust the police. Time after time we see they are not significantly better than the general population. If we let them hide their process, it always devolves into an abusive process that targets innocent people and destroys their lives.

Re:Well come on bootlickers

By smooth wombat • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Ah yes, the censorship that still allowed people to see the lies about ivermectin. Clearly an abuse of power to let people see the lies. And no, the technologies in this story were not used by Biden. So another lie which isn’t being censored.

Mandatory vaccinations were for a select group of people: i.e. the military and medical workers. No one else was required to get a vaccination.

But please, continue licking RFK, Jr’s boots. He needs all the help he can get.

Re:Well come on bootlickers

By jhoegl • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
“going towards authoritarianism” and supporting “border patrol, ICE, police, military, and prisons”, is the same thing.
You should look up how there are so many people who are here trying to get citizenship, and why the lag of getting them in as citizens is there. (Hint, defunding of the Immigration courts over 20+ years, you can literally see it in statistics).
Immigration is needed for our country, and that is who we are as a country. So its odd you think it is the worst thing.
And lets address your racist comment, you do know that people of all colors have been here well before the 1980s, which BTW, had a way higher crime rate than right now.
Are you even from the USA? Feels like you dont know anything about this country.

AMD Working To ‘Push Rust Deep into the GPU Stack’

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Phoronix reports:
AMD is building out what they are describing as an “elite” team of developers for driving Rust code “deep into the GPU stack” from firmware to drivers, shader compilers, and other GPU software in Rust. AMD Senior Fellow Harsh Meno posted this week to LinkedIn about this new effort…

And note this AMD job posting that’s active for hiring a software development engineer to work on Rust code…

“We are building next-generation systems software for AMD GPUs with Rust as a core technical direction. The work spans compilers, runtimes, low-level GPU software, firmware, developer tooling, and methods for improving the safety and correctness of complex hardware-software systems.

“Rust is not incidental to this role. You will help establish how Rust is used in performance-sensitive and high-trust parts of the GPU stack, including the compiler and tooling support, system interfaces, engineering practices, and validation methods required for production deployment. You will have the opportunity to influence both near-term implementations and the longer-term architecture for using Rust across current and future AMD platforms.”
“AMD also isn’t alone,” the article points out, “as NVIDIA has also been pursuing similar Rust-based initiatives for their GPU software too, including the development of the Nova Linux kernel driver written in Rust.”

Re:I hope they don’t expect Rust to do magic

By drinkypoo • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

This is an incredibly frustrating time to try to use a GPU in general. On Windows, both drivers are shit. On Linux, the closed source drivers are all shit, but the AMD OSS driver is pretty good. And despite this, AMD won’t open the floodgates and give away enough information to actually make it as good as it could be. They have absolute proof that they cannot do as well as the community, but they absolutely refuse to let the data flow. And yet, they are still multiple times as helpful as Nvidia.

Re:Artificial Intelligence

By SlashbotAgent • Score: 4, Informative Thread

I understand. It’s true most AIs can generate code in virtually any language. But, my experience has been that the code quality drops precipitously if the language is not one of the ones I’ve mentioned and as the code base grows.

SQL is great. C and C# not so great. Powershell, surprisingly bad after about 50 or more lines.

Re:The latest New Shiny Bandwagon …

By mattr • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Not a Rust / GPU dev but what I got from some articles is it greatly reduces the surface area in which memory safety bugs can live, since only the to-the-metal areas are in unsafe blocks, plus Rust gives you synchronization support to avoid race conditions. The drawback is compile time and missing the newest parts of the ecosystem. Asahi Linux’ Rust based Apple GPU driver has only 3% unsafe code so a lot less code can go wrong.
https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/…

Rust is FAST. Ruby is slow

By Somervillain • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

… has the full orchestra on it it seems. Reminds me of when every webdev was extolling the virtues of Ruby to whoever would listen. How often do you see any mention of it now?

Wtf is the point of Rust at the to-the-metal level when by definition most of what you do will be unsafe memory wise? Seems to me like some Rust shills have been evangelising to devs still at the age where they can’t differentiate marketing BS from fact.

WTAF Dude? Have you been so burnt by the past that you can’t see when the industry does something right for a change? Rust gives nearly indistinguishable performance from C with memory safety and nearly equal efficiency. Isn’t that what greybeards have been clamoring for since Java arrived (PSA: Java is nearly as fast as C for long running processes, like servers, but a HOG for RAM)? While I am too new at it to find rust intuitive or pleasant (I still understand C more), you can’t argue with the results.

Ruby was a massive failure because arrogant hipsters coupled a pretty good idea (rails) with a dogshit arrogant language that traded masturbatory elegance for performance and usefulness. You already know this, I wager.

Rust delivers. Now regarding nVidia? Well, I am not GPU driver dev, but I would wager that it’s not going to be manipulating memory registers. However, the nVidia driver download is nearly 1 GIGABYTE. I am sure a LOT of that code is not manipulating memory, but high-level functions that could benefit from Rust.

Re:Trust?

By thegarbz • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Rust is often regarded as being “memory safe”, which it absolutely is not, since it has an “unsafe” keyword.

I think you may have just written the dumbest words ever put to text in a technical context (sorry but Slashdot politics still has your post beat). The whole point of memory safety is that you explicitly need to make a conscious decision to avoid it and do so in an auditable way.

Three Cities, 16 Years And $1 Billion Later, ‘Defiant’ Lucas Museum of Narrative Art Opens To Mixed Reviews

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
It looks like a spaceship hovering over South Los Angeles, writes CNN, with futuristic tube-like elevators and an exhibition of Banksy murals. There’s a room featuring Luke Skywalker’s X-34 Landspeeder, but in its gardens there’s a 19th-century cast of a sculpture showing David conquering Goliath — and then a bronze statue of Princess Leia strangling Jabba the Hutt with a chain. Next to Rosie the Riveter. CNN argues it’s the museum’s message that “all forms of art and mythology on display here — from comic book illustrations and ‘Star Wars’ concept art to Impressionist masterpieces and reproductions of the Sistine Chapel — are worthy of equal consideration within the long arc of human history.”
More than 16 years after first proposing a cultural institution dedicated to visual storytelling, filmmaker George Lucas and his wife, businesswoman Mellody Hobson, will open their long-awaited museum in Los Angeles on September 22. The project made two false starts — plans to construct it in San Francisco and Chicago were both eventually abandoned — and has cost Lucas around $1 billion of his own money to build… Inside, visitors will find a significant slice of Lucas’ private collection, amassed over five decades and spanning art, costumes, movie props and memorabilia, with more than 1,300 objects currently displayed across 30 galleries…

Many fans will come for the “Star Wars” vehicles and sculptures of Yoda and Grogu, but the sci-fi mega-franchise only occupies about 7% of the museum. Lucas and Hobson are betting those visitors will stay for artworks by Frida Kahlo and Norman Rockwell, photographs by Gordon Parks, comics by Frank Miller and Cowboy Bebop anime, which will be screened in one of two theaters alongside early silent movies, Lucas’ own student films and productions by famed historical artists like Man Ray… [M]ajor art institutions like New York’s Museum of Modern Art and London’s Tate Britain have reconsidered the cultural canon by rehanging their permanent collections, exhibiting overlooked or marginalized artists alongside more widely celebrated names. The Lucas Museum appears to follow a similar philosophy, contending that the gravitas of an artwork is not just determined by its display in space but by what it’s in dialogue with. Lucas has even called his namesake museum “a temple to the peoples’ art,” elevating the work of illustrators and other underappreciated art forms…

The museum defines narrative art as any art that tells a story, and, moving through the space, one feels the enormity of the task of organizing and presenting such a broad vision… The open-plan, curvilinear design means the galleries are not fully divided, reinforcing the all-encompassing nature of the collection, though altogether the vast array of exhibits sometimes struggle for cohesiveness. Disjointed curation may reflect turbulence in the museum’s management ahead of the opening. Last April, former director and CEO Sandra Jackson-Dumont departed, with Lucas himself assuming responsibility for “content direction.” A month later, the museum laid off 15 full-time and seven part-time staff before chief curator Pilar Tompkins Rivas resigned in December, with no replacement planned…

After failing to secure a site in San Francisco, Lucas faced public opposition and a lawsuit in Chicago, with nonprofit Friends of the Parks arguing that his lakefront proposal would essentially privatize public land. Amid the delays and setbacks, simply opening the museum may feel like a victory to its founders.
Lucas’s wife said she’d watched the awe-inspiring activity of genius at work, reports Variety. “And he was fanatical at times, but the thing about a fanatical person is they’re a fan. He was a deep fan of these illustrators in this work, and he wanted them to be represented, and I became a deeper fan of his.”
Hobson teared up as she continued, “I was a fan already, but I saw something, the inspiration, the unwillingness to compromise, the determination, the lack of sleep, the lack of rest, the doggedness that actually taught me so much more than I ever could have imagined.” The museum, which features 1,200 pieces from Lucas’s private collection, has been in the works for about 20 years… “I thought I was tough. I thought I was strong, I thought I had a will, and then I saw George, and I was like, ‘Oh, that’s why you could only do six of those movies,’" Hobson said. “Any more would have killed you.”
Artforum magazine notes the museum received “mixed reviews” before its September 22 opening:
The billion-dollar, 300,000-square-foot museum, which opens to the public on September 22, encompasses 100,000 square feet of gallery space housing the collection of Lucas and Hobson. Intended to highlight storytelling in art, it presents the work of comic book artists John Romita Sr. and R. Crumb, illustrators Maxfield Parrish and Norman Rockwell, and fantasy painters Boris Vallejo and Frank Frazetta alongside masterworks by Artemisia Gentileschi, Lucas Cranach the Elder, and Pieter Brueghel the Younger, as well as Mary Cassatt, Frida Kahlo, and John Singer Sargent. All the works on display were chosen for their ability to tell a story, frequently in a single frame, Hobson told members of the press on September 2…

“Some visitors may be scandalized by the collision of so-called ‘high’ and ‘low,’" wrote Min Chen in Artnet News. “But there’s something liberating about watching those hierarchies collapse, seeing the breadth of human creativity arrayed beyond the bounds of genre or canon.” Notably, most of the works appear without didactics, which is intentional. “We’re encouraging people to have their own individual encounters with works of art and take away what they feel like speaks to them,” Lucas told The Guardian.

The tactic did not land for everyone. “Without [didactics], I left the Lucas without a clear sense of how the museum is positioning itself or, frankly, without learning much about anything beyond what I already knew....” wrote Maximiliano Durón in Artnews. “The Museum of Narrative Art lacks any kind of narrative.” Mary McNamara of the Los Angeles Times was unfazed by the lack of information, calling the institution "gutsy” and “defiant.”

“Critics will roar,” wrote McNamara, “but the Lucas Museum is a win for ‘the people’s art.’"
Even the museum’s web site is a visual extravaganza (and impossible to scroll). Reportedly there’s two restaurants, including the rooftop Skywalker Grill, which offers offering everything from striped bass and ragu bolognese to lobster corn dogs and Skywalker ranch Waygu burgers.

Re:Now I want to go

By phantomfive • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
It means the LA critic establishment hates the museum, that’s why they write like that. Critics in LA form a weird kind of hierarchical establishment, and they have some power because they can get quoted in news articles.

“Good at getting quoted” is an orthogonal skill to “being a good judge of art,” and it’s apparent that Lucas did not appropriately kowtow to the establishment in the way necessary to get promoted. The critics can’t outright say it’s bad, because if it’s popular, then people won’t trust them.

Weird but kind of cool

By T34L • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
I gotta give to Lucas that while much of his work is of questionable qualities across many metrics they could be judged on, he still spends his energy and more importantly money on things that make him happy and attempt to bring something he finds cool and interesting into the world, instead of trying to usurp platforms to further his fave political agendas and stroke his ego, which cannot be said for many/most pepole of his status. Can’t say he’s my favourite creator, but at least he acts like a human being, rather than turning into a monstrous hollow husk chasing profit or worse, trying to make other people’s life worse actively like certain individuals that give many a slashdot commenter raging hardons.

Re:Weird but kind of cool

By Registered Coward v2 • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

I gotta give to Lucas that while much of his work is of questionable qualities across many metrics they could be judged on, he still spends his energy and more importantly money on things that make him happy and attempt to bring something he finds cool and interesting into the world, instead of trying to usurp platforms to further his fave political agendas and stroke his ego, which cannot be said for many/most pepole of his status. Can’t say he’s my favourite creator, but at least he acts like a human being, rather than turning into a monstrous hollow husk chasing profit or worse, trying to make other people’s life worse actively like certain individuals

I certainly agree, and find teh whole high and low art a bunch of BS. Some people like one thing and another a different thing, neither is better just different. The only thing the distinction is good for is for some pretentious critics to pontificate about things most people never read.

that give many a slashdot commenter raging hardons.

You saying /. is good for foreplay?

Re:architecture

By phantomfive • Score: 5, Funny Thread
Let’s be honest, there’s not much you could do architecturally to make Los Angeles uglier. Even a small nuke attack (tragedy though it is) would arguably add interest.

Re:Now I want to go

By TwistedGreen • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Is anyone surprised that someone named Maximiliano Durón wasn’t happy with the didactics of a Star Wars museum?

Why Google Told Drivers to Drive a Longer Way On Purpose

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“A team at Google’s research arm used Google Maps to reroute a small portion of drivers in 10 U.S. cities,” reports SFGate — including San Francisco and Los Angeles.

“Through their experiment, which was published in the journal Nature Cities in June, the researchers sought to evenly spread traffic down more corridors as the drivers head to similar destinations, in the hopes of reducing congestion.”
The experiments nudged up vehicle speeds by 2% on average on the congested roads, and shortened travel times by a modest 0.7%. Scientists have long thought that traffic could be eased this way, and this now demonstrates how it could actually work in the real world.

The researchers collected data on weekdays in the 10 cities, which included Seattle, Salt Lake City, Chicago and Atlanta. While they studied a variety of types of roads, from city streets to highways, they found that in cities such as Los Angeles where they targeted highways, their diversions had the biggest effect, with driving speeds in those areas increasing by about 4.6%. Most cities, though, saw a smaller improvement with speeds across them increasing by just 0.5% during peak times. The Google study’s findings confirm what other researchers have long suspected, said Michael Manville, a professor of urban planning at UCLA who was not involved in the study. “This is a pretty nice empirical illustration of a longstanding idea,” he said. If a clogged traffic artery is on the verge of a long delay, he said, rerouting a small number of vehicles away from the bottleneck produces a “not gigantic but noticeable result....”

As with other traffic interventions, there’s a risk that Google’s approach to spreading traffic could backfire. This concept, known as “induced demand,” also applies to efforts like adding a lane to a critical highway, which temporarily relieves congestion, until traffic rises again. “You can do this, but you cannot be too successful, because if you are too successful, then more people will start driving, and essentially you’ll be back to ground zero,” [said Alexandre Bayen, a co-author of the study and director of UC Berkeley’s Center for Information Technology Research in the Interest of Society]. “That’s why when we did the study, we only operated at the margin.” The idea is to make minor improvements, enough to matter in the aggregate but not so significant that people notice and start driving more, canceling those improvements…

The Google Research study also considered the potential environmental benefits of its traffic improvements. The paper highlights the carbon dioxide emission reductions resulting from the slightly smoother traffic flow and shortened travel times, which add up to a savings of about 1,000 metric tons annually. That’s equivalent to the emissions of about 200 vehicles, a drop in the bucket for cities with millions of cars, the majority of which are still gas guzzlers, even in San Francisco and LA. Bayen acknowledges that while emphasizing the cumulative benefit if such efforts were sustained for a longer time. For Manville, the study is a useful proof of concept. “It is a demonstration that if we managed roads better, air would probably be cleaner,” he said.
According to the article, “Google’s study might not just be a one-off, and city officials could decide to make use of the Google research findings, Bayen said, such as by trying to improve traffic congestion on a larger scale…”

“Google declined SFGATE’s requests for comment on whether the company informed city authorities or rerouted drivers about the study,” the article points out.

Experiencing this firsthand

By fjo3 • Score: 5, Informative Thread
Had this happen three times in the last month or two in Northern California. As long as I follow the new route strictly, I usually get there at about the same time I would have otherwise, but with a brand new view of the cityscape / rural landscape. Went for a nice river drive last week, 10/10 so far.

Re:Induced demand is BS

By serviscope_minor • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Induced demand is BS […]Traffic engineers are fucking assholes, every last one of them.

You can’t wish away reality jut because you don’t like it.

We should have double-decker freeways and people zipping along from wherever they want to be.

How much more tax are you prepared to pay to support that?

Re:Induced demand

By thegarbz • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I think you fundamentally misunderstand the point. The point of induced demand is that it can’t solve traffic congestion, it can only further intrench car dependency. It’s counter-intuitive to its own goal, as you said the point is to get people where they want to get to, and the best way of doing that is to provide them with a method of doing so that doesn’t waste their lives.

Induced demand is a concept unique to overcrowded individual mobility sources, specifically driving. On the flip side you can do something like invest in high-speed rail or better more efficient public transit and move more people, more quickly, without it just turning into a parking lot, which at the same time reduces demand on an arterial.

This isn’t a question of expand highway vs do nothing. It’s a question of expanding highway vs doing something different that may have a better outcome (for both people who will use the system as well existing people on the highway who won’t).

Rather than telling people to fuck off, please understand what it means in the context of city planning.

But if that’s your aim, at least be honest about it.

City planning is fundamentally about controlling habits of people. It’s at the very core. You don’t drive because you want to drive. You drive because planners and designers have ultimately created an environment which made it either the best or maybe the only option for you. This kind of thing doesn’t need to be stated.

Re:Induced demand

By 2TecTom • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

car dependency is baked into large tract single use developments, fix the corrupt development process and then maybe you can reduse the need for travel in the first place

people don’t just decide to drive around for little reason

Re:Experiencing this firsthand

By coofercat • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

For what it’s worth, London Black Cab Drivers (broadly regarded as something of a ‘gold standard’ for such things) will never take you across london by crossing the river twice. The river does bend around quite sharply, and for a few journeys it makes absolute sense, but they won’t do it because people, being thicker than two short planks, complain that the driver is taking them the “long way”, when actually they are keeping it as short as possible.

These days with GPS maps and such like, I suspect thick people have offloaded even more of their thinking to their phone apps, so maybe nowadays things are different, I don’t know.

As for this story, I’d expect them to find me the quickest route, taking traffic into account. I don’t know how these journeys are charged, but in the UK, it’s per mile and per minute - that is, you get charged for sitting in traffic, as well as zipping down a trunk road. As such, I suspect most people would prefer the quickest route, given that it’s highly unlikely to be materially much longer than the shortest route.

Does Brave Browser Load Faster Than Chrome, Firefox, and Microsoft Edge?

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
The Brave web browser published a new round of benchmarks claiming its desktop browser uses less system resources than Chrome, Microsoft Edge, and Firefox — and also loads pages faster. The blog Linuxiac reports:
According to Brave’s testing, the browser used 44% less CPU, 28% less memory, and 10% less energy on average compared with the three competing browsers. It also completed page loads 20% faster while transferring 26% less inbound data and 39% less outbound data…

- Brave averaged about 33% CPU usage, while Chrome used 47%, Edge 53%, and Firefox 78%.

- For memory, Brave used about 1.2 GB, compared to 1.75 GB for Chrome, 1.62 GB for Edge, and 1.65 GB for Firefox.

By stopping ads, analytics scripts, tracking pixels, and other third-party requests from loading, the browser has less network traffic and less work to do. In page-loading tests, Brave took about 4.4 seconds to fully load a page. Chrome took 5.1 seconds, Firefox 5.3 seconds, and Edge 6 seconds. However, when measuring Largest Contentful Paint, which is when the main content appears, Brave and Chrome both averaged about 2.4 seconds, with Edge and Firefox just behind at 2.5 seconds. This means Brave’s main advantage comes after the main content is visible, since there are fewer background ads, trackers, analytics requests, and delayed scripts to process.

Who cares

By gweihir • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

It is fast enough. The thing that counts is that Brave has very good ad-blocking and that is far more important.

Who cares?

By topham • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

I opened my browser 3 months ago.

Seems suspect at best

By thecombatwombat • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

I just never trust benchmarks at this point. They always seem to be lies.

They are using an almost year old version of Firefox, and testing on a Mac. I wonder why that could be?

Conveniently, somehow, they chose a version just before Firefox enabled a bunch of GPU acceleration on the M series Macs . . .

If they’d just left it at “here’s how much data you save when having an ad blocker on by default” they’d have a find point. But beyond that the comparison seems really, really deceptive.

Re:bullshit

By outsider007 • Score: 5, Informative Thread

You can opt out of all of it in settings + change the start page

Re:Who cares

By AmiMoJo • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Brave is scummy though. They messed with affiliate links to steal revenue, and took tips for people who were not part of their tips programme. They can’t be trusted.

They have also decided to remove Manifest V2 support, so no more uBlock Origin. In fact, Firefox is now the only major browser that still supports it. uBlock Lite isn’t ideal.

I’d like to switch to a Chromium based browser because Firefox continues to have issues, none of them appear to have first rate ad blocking on both desktop and Android, along with sync for history/tabs and passwords.

Also note that in this test they used an old version of Firefox. Performance has improved lately, although not to Chrome levels.

Switzerland’s Federal Government Tests Open-Source Alternatives to Microsoft on 3,000 Computers

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Switzerland has a population of 9,154,242. And its federal government just launched a pilot program to test open source alternatives to Microsoft 365 on 3,000 workstations, reports the blog It’s FOSS. “That’s about 7% of the federal workforce.”
The target is to complete the migration by end of 2027… On September 3, 2026, the Federal Council published results of “PoC BOSS”, a feasibility proof-of-concept involving 172 federal employees who tested the openDesk suite, a German open-source collaboration platform. During the proof-of-concept phase, core office tasks like document processing and email received positive assessments, while large-scale video conferencing still showed technical limitations. Based on the ‘success’ of the PoC phase with 172 employees, the pilot is now launched for 3,000 employees…

According to Matthias Stürmer, professor at the Bern University of Applied Sciences, Microsoft’s supremacy in public institutions poses three problems that are driving this migration. First is the risk of foreign access. US cloud legislation could expose Swiss government data to foreign authorities. Second is the risk to service continuity, as dependency on a single foreign vendor creates operational risk. The third risk is the escalating costs as proprietary licensing fees are rising with no Swiss leverage.

Switzerland’s military cybersecurity unit, Cyber Command, is not waiting for the civilian pilot. It is already poised to replace Microsoft 365 entirely with openDesk by October 2026. It is pretty much the same reason. Military doesn’t want foreign governments accessing sensitive Swiss data.
The article notes that during the pilot phase, the new system runs in parallel with Microsoft 365 rather than replacing it. But the article’s author speculates that “If the pilot is successful, we might expect the migration to continue on all the 54,000 workstations owned by the federal administrations.”

National security

By dskoll • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Relying on proprietary USA software or services is a national security risk for all non-USA countries. So good for Switzerland.

I wish my country (Canada) would start taking digital sovereignty seriously, but our government is so far down the MSFT rabbit-hole that I don’t hold out much hope we’ll ever disentangle ourselves until the USA does something draconian and then we’re really screwed.

The US better look into this too

By RitchCraft • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Microsoft is only looking out for Microsoft. Heck, just a few months ago we found out that Microsoft was using “proxy techs” in China for DoD tech support. ALL governments need to rethink how deeply they want Microsoft, or any other closed source tech company, within their ranks.

Re: We actually looked at it

By MeNeXT • Score: 5, Informative Thread

You are right in your statement but you don’t manage 1,500 Linux/Unix stations like Windows that’s why it was so expensive. There are tools for free to even manage a greater number of stations.

When you lock yourself in a proprietary system and tools then you are right that they don’t work on other systems. It’s not Linux that is restricting your use.

My kids grew up using systems no employer used. They grew up computer literate and today they have no issues using any computer even the ones employers use.

Re: We actually looked at it

By gweihir • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Exactly. On Linux you can automatize system administration very well with FOSS. Yes, you have to use different tools, but, for example, SSH-ing into a box with certificate-based authentication when it is up is trivial. Scripting that way is trivial. Even a doing a full installation (on top of a minimal one) this way is trivial. Doing updates this way is trivial. All with the security mind-set that UNIX was designed with from the start.

Now, if you want the same admin interface on Linux as you had on Windows, of course you are paying for that. But you are doing it wrong. There is a reason you need a lot fewer sysadmins on UNIX (and Linux) than on Windows and that reason is that once the sysadmin has automatized everything, very little breaks. Quite unlike Windows.

Of course, the other part of this is that UNIX sysadmins are quite a bit more expensive than Windows ones, because the expectations are a lot higher. But you still come out ahead by a lot.

Re:Reliability

By gweihir • Score: 5, Informative Thread

To be fair, he is really good at breaking and messing up things. Seems almost like a super-power.

Instead of Fighting AI, Some Teachers Work It Into Their Lessons

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Last year the writing program at the University of Baltimore used an app that tracks students while they’re writing in Google Docs, offering teachers a video playing back revisions “with a scoreboard of all the edits, pastes and minutes spent on it,” writes the Washington Post. “Is it surveillance? Yes, I think obviously,” says the program’s director.

But was there a better way?
She is one of a dozen educators around the country who told The Post that they’re experimenting with a different approach to student use of generative artificial intelligence this school year. Teachers and professors are throwing out old assignments, installing new policies and protocols, and incorporating AI built for the classroom, rather than feeling forced to choose between returning to pencil and paper or acting like the AI police.

Her new lesson plan even incorporates generative AI in a controlled way to let her evaluate students’ critical thinking skills. She created chatbots using BoodleBox, the university’s AI vendor, that allow instructors to see both sides of the conversation. For an assignment testing students’ ability to make evidence-based arguments, they participate in a simulated school board meeting about banning books. It involves debating chatbots designed by Zeleny with names like the Confrontational Parent. Writing students usually turn in business proposals and research papers. This semester, instructors are starting to ask instead for transcripts of conversations a student had with a chatbot, a handwritten outline of their composition, and a video reflection of how they felt about the work. “In a lot of ways, we have made these assignments harder, but writing should have always had more detailed checkpoints along the way,” she said.

That’s the smart strategy

By Tablizer • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

because AI ain’t going away. Teachers will get their learning experiments wrong sometimes, but that’s par for the course for disruptive technologies.

Fools blindly trust or blindly distrust.

By drnb • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Hard to see the article as unbiased since the Washington Post is owned by one of the largest sells of AI services in the world.

You are working from a fallacy. Attacking the owner of a newspaper rather than the information.

Reality is that news organizations that are own by people you like, and people you dislike, will both lie to you at times, will both tell the truth at times. Which occurs is simply a matter of coincidence, of who the truth happens to coincidentally align with today. Sometimes that will be friends, sometimes that will be opponents.

So to find bias look at the information itself, from multiple sources. Then do your own research to see where the truth happens to lie. The con games of thieves and politicians and their surrogates only works if you blindly trust or blindly distrust.

And don’t be foolish and think if one side if lying the other is telling the truth, they may both be trying to manipulate you with lies.

Or AI is just a tool you need to learn how to use

By drnb • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
AI is a tool. Whether it is good or bad depends on the person using it. Whether that person knows its limitations and flaws or blindly and foolishly trusts it. Used wisely by an informed person, AI can help with some tasks.

Computer literacy classes had to expand the curriculum to safely teach how to use the web, and email. It will need to do the same for AI.

All about their respective agenda, NOT the truth.

By drnb • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

While I agree that both sides of the corporate political landscape lie, it is far from “simply a matter of coincidence”:

The coincidence is whether or not the policy aligns with the truth,

\Trump lies constantly (99.9% lies) …

I bet you go that number from the Democratic party, hint, it was not a day where politics aligned with reality. Now if you want to say that Trump says something dumb or misinformed 99.9% of the time I’d be more included to agree. However those dump, misinformed, mangled statements sometime actually align with policy representing the truth.

… and most of the Republican party still backs him up.

Sometimes it is that the underlying policy matches the truth, despite how mangled in its presentation. Sometimes it is the democrats have an even worse idea (back to that zero sum thinking, they are wrong so we must be correct).

The (corporate) Democrats prefer to obfuscate and only outright lie maybe 10-20% of the time. The progressives only lie by accident - which is why the oligarchs don’t back them and they have trouble getting elected.

Sorry, left, right, far left, far right, will all obfuscate and only outright lie when their desired policy does not match the truth. They are NOT new organizations, they are NOT historians, they are all organization that seek to MANUFACTURE a perception that will advance their political agenda. Its all about their respective agenda, NOT the truth.

Another truth is that they may (both or not) be trying to distract you with a non-issue, like the Culture Wars, distracting from real issues.

These wedge issue are manufactured, or if real do not get solved, because both sides raise money or turn out voters on election day thanks to them.

Re:Or AI is just a tool you need to learn how to u

By drnb • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Yeah of course it’s a tool but I’m not convinced about its net societal value.

One obvious thing, a web search. It will probably scan more web sites than I would. The key here is that it should provide a comprehensive list of references. Just like a formal paper for school. Ask for one in the prompt.

A similar case for programmers is looking up stuff things that are in reference manuals or books. AI can save me time walking over to my bookshelf and looking up something Again, references are important.

I’ve done the latter and had good results. In particular I recalled a day at work many years ago where I had to repeatedly sort some data in a high performance environment (3D rendering during rotation). I knew the nature of the data (only minor changes between sorts). I went and found Knuth, looked up the algorithm that matches the data, looked at Knuth’s sample implementation, and implemented something for my project. In modern times I created a prompt asking for an algorithm matching the data and to provide a sample in a particular programming language. I find that AI reproduces what I found years ago.

Admittedly, big caveat here. This tends to work only with things heavily discussed in academic journals, textbooks, and other prrfessional engineering oriented publications. Start asking question outside suck heavily studied areas and you tend to get random things from stack overflow. Some good, some not.

But when students use it for assignments to gain advantage over others that are trying to learn, that’s not ok though.

I agree that students need to learn to do the work manually, to not be dependent upon AI. A common analogy being learning to do arithmetic with pencil and paper before moving to a calculator. But once we are testing students on their algebra, their physics, then we can allow them to use a calculator for any arithmetic involved. Similarly, at some point in college, an AI assisted spelling and grammar checker should be allowed. An AI assisted search for reference material. I’d point out that when I do a ‘word” search at a terminal in my university library I get different results than a public search on my personal computer using public searches. My onsite library search does a far better job at listing matches with the academic journals the university has. Perhaps an AI can help narrow the gap between onsite library and public searches. Note is at a finding references stage. An AI composing a student’s paper is an entirely different thing.

A Man Charged His EV at a Dealership - and Was Billed $418

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
The EV blog Electrek reports:
A Clinton Township, Michigan man was charged $418 for a single EV charging session at Elder Hyundai’s Macomb Township store after finding the charger listed as publicly available on the EVgo app, but didn’t discover the charges until after wrapping up his 40-ish minute charging session. “I was flabbergasted,” explained Stanley Kpenkann, who had been driving a rented Chevy Bolt EV at the time. “Never in my wildest dreams did I think I would be saddled with a bill of $418 for a charging session.”

After calling EVgo to report the error, he found that the exorbitant charge wasn’t a mistake at all - Elder Hyundai was charging customers an eye-gouging $5 per kWh, plus another $5 for every minute connected.
A local news report notes that “After back-and-forth with EVgo, the company processed what it called a goodwill refund of $405.” (And the dealership argued their charger was reserved for its own customers and vehicles, so they set prices high to deter outside use.)

But Electrek argues the story “speaks to much larger problems among the EV charging business in particular and car dealerships in general…”
[In June] Plug & Play EV‘s Steve Birkett took to LinkedIn to call out his local Hyundai dealer in Union, NJ for charging a ridiculous $15 per kWh to top off his IONIQ 5 (!)… Even worse, he noted that a number of area dealerships that had listed their ports as “public” were actively discouraging public use with signs and stickers designed to turn people away…

[U]nlike gas stations, EV charge point operators in many states aren’t required to clearly advertise what they’ll charge before a driver plugs in in the same way that gas stations are: with clearly legible signage that’s visible from the street.

This is a nothing burger.

By MikeDataLink • Score: 5, Informative Thread

The guy admits he saw the price on the screen and charged anyway.

Re:News Flash

By Powercntrl • Score: 5, Informative Thread

A tip I picked up is that it’s cheap to charge up an EV at campsites

There are so many caveats to that idea:

1. Most campground owners don’t want you drawing 32A for hours. Their wiring infrastructure was designed with assumption it would only see the intermittent spikes in usage typical of an RV.
2. An EVSE plugged into a NEMA 14-50 outlet maxes out at 32A. Even with a car with a smaller battery pack (such as the Chevy Bolt in TFS) is going to be charging for hours depending on how much juice you’re trying to add. You may very well end up spending the night sleeping in the car.
3. Public L2 chargers are a thing (usually found at hotels, shopping centers, and parking garages) if you really don’t mind the slow charging speeds. A lot of them are cheap or sometimes even free.
4. DCFC is expensive, but generally still not as expensive as paying a campground fee. Just get an adapter if your car doesn’t already support NACS, and go to the nearest Tesla Supercharger that is open to non-Tesla EVs (most of them are at this point). You won’t have to worry about sketchy dealerships and their price gouging chargers.

Re:News Flash

By thegarbz • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Not quite. The dealership is doing basically what we do as well: Pay for charging stations for private use, but because they partnered with a company they need to be publicly accessible. So they set a ludicrous rate for the general public and then discount it for employees / customers by a high number.

It’s not that out of the ordinary.

The dealer explicitly said the charger was intended for their use and the high prices are to try and prevent members of the public from blocking it from the employees.

Re:News Flash

By Xenx • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
They willingly signed up to be part of a public network, it’s on them for choosing to do so. They’re absolutely assholes.

Chargers for the customers and employees

By drnb • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Car dealership ran by piece of shit.

No. A business has every right to put an EV charger outside for THEIR customers. For example a restaurant or a store. An employer putting up chargers for its employees.

However such a charger should be plainly identified as such with its signage, that it is for customers or employees not the public at large. Costco gas pumps need to see a Costco membership before pumping. EV chargers could do something similar to restrict to customers or employees.

‘She Lost Her Sight. Her Billionaire Father Bet On a Daring New Treatment.’

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“Billionaire Bill Ackman’s life was upended this February when his 26-year-old daughter collapsed in her Brooklyn apartment, suffering a brain hemorrhage that would render her unable to move, speak or see,” writes the Washingon Post. But then…
The hedge fund manager did what any good father would do — at least, any father with vast financial resources and what friends describe as a “Mr. Fix-It” tendency. He sprung into action, getting her topline care at New York City’s Mt. Sinai Hospital and consulting a network of well-connected friends all over the world. He helped her access a novel cell therapy that has been gaining traction among longevity enthusiasts, who are seeking ways to prolong human life. And then — motivated by a newfound desire to accelerate scientific research — he vowed to spend more than $400 million to launch an institute dedicated to longevity and brain health… He posted this week that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, in May, gave his daughter Lucy’s medical team a first-time emergency authorization to transplant mitochondria — the energy-producing part of human cells — from her leg muscle to her eyes, in the hopes that the tiny cell powerhouses would facilitate healing in her optic nerves and perhaps even restore her vision.

Ackman’s story highlights the increasingly prominent role of the ultra-wealthy in making expensive medical bets on longevity treatments and other novel therapies, altering the direction of research as federal funding for science declines in the second Trump administration. But his saga is a deeply personal one, spurred by his daughter’s medical crisis. The focus on longevity by Ackman, who made billions on Wall Street as a hedge fund manager, is aligned with similarly ambitious efforts from some of Silicon Valley’s biggest names. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has backed Retro Biosciences, a start-up whose goal is to add 10 healthy years to the human lifespan through cellular reprogramming. Amazon founder Jeff Bezos is reportedly a funder of Altos Labs, which focuses on cellular rejuvenation and resilience… Billionaire investor Peter Thiel, Google co-founder Sergey Brin and Oracle co-founder Larry Ellison are also deeply invested in life-extension methods and attempts to rewrite the biology of aging…

The therapy given to Ackman’s daughter Lucy, known as mitochondrial transplantation, is of great interest not only to people who have suffered injuries, but to longevity-focused scientists who believe that mitochondria may hold promise for reversing some of the effects of aging… In recent years, scientists have discovered that mitochondria have many other functions beyond converting food into energy. They serve as clearinghouses for damaged cells, opening up the possibility that they can help with cell regeneration and healing, said Daria Mochly-Rosen, professor of chemical and systems biology at the Stanford University School of Medicine and co-author of " The Life Machines: How Taking Care of Your Mitochondria Can Transform Your Health.”

“I am one of those who believes that focusing on mitochondrial health is a way to address many human diseases, including aging itself,” she said. “It’s exciting.”

Do we need to infect the children of the 1%

By gurps_npc • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Because if the only way we can get the money to cure diseases, then I wonder will this start to happen?

Have a rare disease? Only hope is for you to and intentionally infect the son/daughter of the wealthy.

The entire idea of taxes is to take the money from all - including the wealthy - and use it for the common good. We should NOT have to pray the wealthy becomes interested enough to do it on their own.

Re:It’s he and other people like him

By ObliviousGnat • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

This article reads like pro-billionaire corporatist propaganda.

It’s unfortunate that progress often needs something personal for it to happen, like the politicians who openly opposed gay rights until their children came out.

uhh

By nomadic • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

" suffering a brain hemorrhage that would render her unable to move, speak or see,”

And they went with sight in the headline? Being unable to move is waaaaay worse.

Anyway, I feel bad for her and him (though he’s a right-wing nutjob who has used his wealth to help drag down American society).

Looking for info related to the title?

By 93 Escort Wagon • Score: 5, Informative Thread

The article hardly talks about it at all… mainly because it sounds like they might not have accomplished much. From TFA:

For the first few weeks, the treatment — an injection into her eyes — provided Lucy Ackman with a modicum of benefit. She regained the ability to perceive light, according to a paper that Putrino’s team has submitted to the journal Nature, but has not been peer-reviewed. The paper noted that it caused no harm to the eyes, which was important to measure since this was the first time it had been done in a person. After about a month, the benefit appeared to wear off.

“We are working on a method to inject her eyes with more frequency,” Bill Ackman posted this week, adding that mitochondria “has amazing potential.”

I’d take the purported temporary “perceiving light” with a big grain of salt.

Re:Just think

By ArchieBunker • Score: 4, Funny Thread

Fortunately ivermectin is the cure and I can buy it from Tractor Supply Co.

‘The Jobs Apocalypse Is Postponed. An AI Jobs Boom Is Here’

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot
A new article about AI in The Economist argues that "Initial effects of the technology on employment look positive.”
Perhaps AI will eventually make many humans unemployable — but there is no sign of it yet. On September 4th the Bureau of Labour Statistics reported that the American economy added 162,000 jobs in August, far above expectations. The unemployment rate is just 4.1%, lower than in almost 90% of months over the past half-century. Young workers, often cast as AI’s first victims, are holding up remarkably well: the gap between unemployment among 20-24-year-olds and the overall rate is close to a multi-decade low.

Some companies and workers are being severely disrupted by AI. Hiring in professional and business services is running about 10% below the average in 2015-19. Tech giants like Microsoft and Meta are trimming headcounts as they reorganise their businesses around the technology. Smaller firms such as Block, the owner of Square and Cash App, and Intuit, the maker of TurboTax and QuickBooks, are replacing people with bots. American companies have announced some 16,000 AI-related job cuts a month on average so far this year, according to Challenger, Gray & Christmas, an employment consultancy.

But AI-related lay-offs gets lost in the churning jobs market where employers shed roughly 1.7m workers in a typical month. And the evidence so far is that AI is already creating a lot of jobs to replace those it has destroyed. The vast sums pouring into data centres and power generation have set off a race for construction and infrastructure workers. AI startups are hiring like there is no tomorrow. Incumbents racing to keep up are creating new AI roles. And by making some workers more productive, AI may be increasing demand for their services.

Add it all up, and The Economist estimates that AI has so far created around 1m new jobs in America. That easily exceeds the roughly 200,000 lay-offs attributed to AI since mid-2023, and appears more than enough to offset weaker hiring in many back-office roles.
Their article acknowledges that since January 2023 employment has fallen roughly 10% for customer-service workers and 15% for administrative assistants. But when The Economist looked at professions “closest to the AI boom” — engineers, software developers, mathematicians and data scientists — they found that since 2022 they’ve added roughly 730,000 jobs above trend. They see AI as creating new white-collar jobs for everyone from model and deployment engineers to new data annotators.

The chief economist at the Burning Glass Institute agrees, estimating that roughly 1% of professional jobs are now “AI jobs” — about 1 million positions in the U.S. — while in computer occupations and life sciences it’s between 4% and 5%. (Data-center construction spending also increased 60% in one year, according to Census Bureau data, creating jobs for electricians, HVAC specialists, grid engineers, and machine technicians.) And “Indeed finds that installation and maintenance jobs at data centres advertise wages about 40% higher than comparable work elsewhere.”

Re:This makes my suspicion nipple tingle

By Anonymous Coward • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I’m not sure anything from the Bureau of Labour Statistics can be trusted right now. Given how blatant Trump has been at telling the Federal Reserve what he wants them to do, do you think some little pimple on the ass of the government like the BLS has got away without being meddled with?

It’ll take a few years, but it’ll become apparent that the “official” statistics or version of events deviates from the ordinary person’s experience pretty soon. Then the journey to the Dark Side (aka. banana republic) will be complete.

25% of U.S. workers are “functionally unemployed”?

By Paul Fernhout • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Hows this for more serious job market stats?
“Nearly 25% of U.S. workers are “functionally unemployed,” economic analysis finds”
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/f…
        “The U.S. job market is less robust than it looks, according to a new analysis.
        The nation’s unemployment rate fell to 4.1% in July, well within the range economists consider healthy. Yet that measure, which reflects the percentage of people 16 and older who don’t have a job and who are looking for work, is an imprecise metric that fails to offer a full picture of the health of the job sector, according to Gene Ludwig, chairman of the Ludwig Institute for Shared Economic Prosperity (LISEP).
        The economic research firm’s “True Rate of Unemployment” (TRU) seeks to capture the share of workers that the group defines as “functionally unemployed.” This includes not only people who are unemployed and looking for a job, but also those who are involuntarily working part-time and who are earning poverty-level wages, or less than $26,000 annually before taxes.
        Functional unemployment across the U.S. has climbed four straight months and stood at 24.9% as of July, although that’s down from 25.2% in December, according to the Ludwig Institute. …”

Shadowstats has some similar unemployment numbers:
https://www.shadowstats.com/al…

To me, these sorts of huge (but often ignored) unemployment numbers reflect the continued playing out of larger trends like I outlined in 2010:
“Beyond a Jobless Recovery: A heterodox perspective on 21st century economics”
https://pdfernhout.net/beyond-…
        “This article explores the issue of a “Jobless Recovery” mainly from a heterodox economic perspective. It emphasizes the implications of ideas by Marshall Brain and others that improvements in robotics, automation, design, and voluntary social networks are fundamentally changing the structure of the economic landscape. It outlines towards the end four major alternatives to mainstream economic practice (a basic income, a gift economy, stronger local subsistence economies, and resource-based planning). These alternatives could be used in combination to address what, even as far back as 1964, has been described as a breaking “income-through-jobs link”. This link between jobs and income is breaking because of the declining value of most paid human labor relative to capital investments in automation and better design. Or, as is now the case, the value of paid human labor like at some newspapers or universities is also declining relative to the output of voluntary social networks such as for digital content production (like represented by this document). It is suggested that we will need to fundamentally reevaluate our economic theories and practices to adjust to these new realities emerging from exponential trends in technology and society. …”

They fired most of the agency…

By acroyear • Score: 5, Informative Thread

…and since then, the jobs report has been notorious for having corrections weeks later that few notice. I won’t even say grain of salt. There’s little about this that will hold up.

Many jobs in hospitality were for the World Cup, and they were all temporary, part time, barely above minimum wage, and now done.

Re:25% of U.S. workers are “functionally unemploye

By Baron_Yam • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

There’s a stat - I forget the name for it - but it’s basically “The percentage of hours worked out of all those who would normally be expected to be working”.

If you’re of working age, not prevented by disability, etc., you would be counted. It can’t be fudged by not counting people who have just given up, it can’t be fudged by counting part time employment. And you can combine that with the wage distribution curve, and then the wealth distribution curve to get a pretty good picture of the overall economic health of your population.

I’ve never heard of a government that wants that. Generally, economic reports are spun to make the government look more effective than it has been and to protect the wealthy against accusations of hoarding that might result in taxation. A really bad government might just give up on spin and, say, fire people who won’t just tell whatever lie they want.

Re:This makes my suspicion nipple tingle

By IDemand2HaveSumBooze • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Any additional jobs gained in construction of datacenters have to be temporary. Once you’re done constructing the datacenter, your job is finished. Unless you assume that the AI bubble keeps growing indefinitely and new datacenters will continuously keep getting built, but even in that case at some point you’ll run out of land.