Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Google Images Gets a Pinterest-Like Redesign Focused On Discovery
  2. Lawsuit Claims Meta’s Layoff Decisions Were Made By AI, Not Humans
  3. Google DeepMind Calls For US To Spearhead AI Standards Body
  4. Linux Foundation’s Latest Foray Is To Standardize Internet-Native Payments For AI Agents
  5. OnePlus Is Reportedly Shutting Down In the US, Europe
  6. IBM Stock Collapses After a Grave Warning About AI
  7. New York Becomes First State To Impose Data Center Moratorium
  8. StubHub, CEO Hit With ‘Deceptive Practices’ Class Action Over Mass Scalping
  9. Indian Scientists Produce Most Detailed 3D Atlas of the Human Brainstem
  10. Scientists Find Sugar Deep In Our Galaxy
  11. Over 200 Economists Say ‘We Must Act Now’ On AI’s Economic Impact
  12. Microsoft Promises To Fix Search With Major Windows 11 Overhaul
  13. US Government Warns That Russia State Hackers Are Coming After Your Router
  14. German Firm Files For Insolvency After Cybercriminals Shut Down Production For 6 Weeks
  15. States Sue to Block Paramount-Warner Bros Merger, Defying DOJ

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Google Images Gets a Pinterest-Like Redesign Focused On Discovery

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Google Images is getting a Pinterest-like redesign that turns image search into a personalized discovery feed, with “For You” galleries, real-time updates, and collections for saving visual ideas. “Google is also adding a way for users to create AI images right in Search, as it celebrates 25 years since the debut of Google Images,” reports TechCrunch. From the report:
After navigating to the redesigned Google Images, users will see a “For You” gallery of images tailored to their interests and browsing history. Like Pinterest, the gallery is designed for continuous browsing, with Google saying it updates in real time with new images. As users browse, they can save ideas to their “collections,” which will appear as tabs above the main gallery of photos. For example, users can create collections for things like vacation outfit ideas, travel inspiration, and ways to design a reading nook, which they can come back to later.

[…] As for generating images directly in Search, Google says the feature is meant for moments when you have a highly specific idea for an image that doesn’t already exist online. Google is bringing image generation directly into AI Overviews on Search and will use its latest Nano Banana model to transform a text prompt into a custom visual. The feature can also help users reimagine spaces and visualize ideas, such as seeing what a room might look like painted red or what a dorm room with a coastal theme could look like.

Pinterest ruined Google’s image search

By SoCalChris • Score: 3 Thread

JFC, Pinterest absolutely ruined Google’s image search results years ago. Now they’re trying to emulate that?

Anybody have any better alternatives?

Lawsuit Claims Meta’s Layoff Decisions Were Made By AI, Not Humans

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
A lawsuit from 26 Meta employees alleges the company used AI-driven scoring and monitoring systems to select workers for layoffs, disproportionately targeting employees with disabilities or those who had taken protected medical, family, pregnancy, or parental leave. “Meta did not assemble the termination list through the considered judgment of managers who knew the work. Instead, Meta used a constellation of internal artificial-intelligence systems — including a system referred to internally as ‘Metamate,’ employee-trained ‘second-brain’ agents, keystroke- and activity-monitoring data, AI-token-usage dashboards, and algorithmically assisted performance ranking and calibration — to score, rank, and select employees for inclusion on the list,” the lawsuit (PDF) said. Ars Technica reports:
Employees were allegedly graded, among other things, on how much they used Meta’s AI tools. “Meta’s internal dashboards classified employees by their stage of adoption of its artificial-intelligence tools, using categories such as ‘AI Native,’ ‘AI First,’ and ‘AI Enabled,’" the lawsuit said. The lawsuit is apparently “the first against a major U.S. company to challenge the alleged use of AI in conducting layoffs,” according to Reuters. The complaint alleges that Meta’s tools for monitoring employees did not account for differences caused by disabilities and protected leaves. “Those tools draw on inputs — performance ratings, calibration scores, productivity and output metrics, ‘AI-native’ ratings, and AI-token consumption — that, by design, cannot be accumulated by an employee who is on protected medical or family leave, or whose output is reduced by a disability,” the lawsuit said.

The lawsuit alleged that Meta management did not take steps to adjust scores for employees who took leave or who requested reasonable accommodations for disabilities. “Meta did not neutralize those inputs for protected leave; did not exclude protected-leave-takers or accommodation-seekers from the selection cohort; and did not pause the system for the individualized, leave- and accommodation-neutral review that the law requires,” the complaint alleged. “The result was that employees who took protected leaves were disproportionately selected for layoff, based on scoring that not only failed to account for their protected leaves, but in effect penalized the employees for exercising their legal rights to these leaves.” The 26 plaintiffs requested leaves or disability accommodations in the 24 months before being selected for layoffs, the lawsuit said. The layoffs are not yet finalized, but employees are scheduled to start losing their jobs on July 22, the lawsuit said.
“These claims lack merit and are not based on facts,” said Meta in a statement. “Workforce management and organizational decisions were and are made by people, not AI.”

The new normal, I’d guess

By ffkom • Score: 4 Thread
With hiring already being a game between applicant-used AI and prospective-employer-used AI, it was to be expected that the “firing” part would soon also be automated. As will be the legal dispute where lawyers on both sides, and ultimately the judges, will be AI… maybe with a fig-leaf / scapegoat human to sign off on whatever the AI writes… for a while.

So their AI was just Deloitte or PwC

By geek • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

This is exactly what companies like PwC come in and do. The AI just did it faster.

Correction:

By Sebby • Score: 4, Funny Thread

“These claims lack merit and are not based on facts,” said Meta in a statement. “Workforce management and organizational decisions were and are made by people, not AI.”

“These claims lack merit and are not based on facts,” said Meta’s AI bot in a statement. “Workforce management and organizational decisions were and are made by people, not AI.”

There FTFY.

What goes around

By Himmy32 • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
Working for a business that has captured, analyzed, and commoditized the personal data of the general public, then having those company algorithms come back to bite the workers who enabled the system is mildly poetic, but still a depressing step in the march to a dystopian future.

Is it much different?

By NMBob • Score: 3 Thread
People have been laid off by spreadsheets for decades.

Google DeepMind Calls For US To Spearhead AI Standards Body

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Google DeepMind chief Demis Hassabis is calling for a U.S.-led AI standards body to review frontier models for national security risks such as cybersecurity and biological threats. His proposal would create a federally overseen public-private organization, initially voluntary and eventually mandatory for U.S. deployment. CNBC reports:
Google DeepMind boss Demis Hassabis, a Nobel laureate, said in an article posted on X on Tuesday that “urgent action” was needed to address risks associated with artificial general intelligence (AGI) — the point at which AI matches or surpasses human intelligence. “We’ve already seen the challenges frontier models pose for cybersecurity, and other threats including nuclear and bio risks may soon emerge as capabilities continue to advance,” he said.

[…] Hassabis said the U.S. was well positioned to lead in developing an AI framework “given its economic and technical standing.” “It could establish a new Standards Body modelled on a federally overseen public-private partnership or self-regulatory organisation, much like the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), with a board that includes independent leading technical experts and open-source representatives,” he added. FINRA regulates brokerage firms and exchange markets in the U.S.

The proposed body would need “substantial” funding “in order to attract world-class technical talent and provide the necessary compute resources for large-scale testing,” Hassabis said. Funding would “likely” come from industry, he added. Frontier labs would initially voluntarily share models with the body for review up to 30 days before release, before becoming mandatory for deployment in the U.S. market after being shown to be “effective.” “Specific agentic AI tests could look for attempts to bypass safety guardrails or signs of deception, and ensure best practices, such as digitally watermarking AI-generated images and generating human-readable output tokens to understand model reasoning,” Hassabis said.
Further reading: Over 200 Economists Say ‘We Must Act Now’ On AI’s Economic Impact

Re:Oh fuck right off

By nightflameauto • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Your shitty chat bot is not a national security risk.

This is about pulling up the ladder behind themselves. Create enough bureaucratic hurdles that new players can’t get a foot in the door and it’s a win for the already established players. They are either feeling like they’re doing good enough to make this effort worthwhile, or they see someone nipping at their heels that may get thrown off-course if they set up the correct set of barriers right now.

Either way, they’re calling for this during an administration that is known to drop any barrier for someone or some company willing to praise the man in the White House, or throw some gifts at him, or outright bribe him. So AI will become an even more outright rich man’s game. And onward we spiral. You’d think the toilet would finish its flush at some point, but thus far we’re still teetering on the edge.

Demis Hassabis is a scientist

By oumuamua • Score: 3 Thread
He is the real deal and doesn’t do marketing bullshit. These researchers are seeing the models a good 6 months before you get them AND they seem them before they are dumbed down with safety restrictions. Someone should probably submit this new paper in the submissions que: From AGI to ASI https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.126…
It means we already have AGI and are moving beyond it.

Linux Foundation’s Latest Foray Is To Standardize Internet-Native Payments For AI Agents

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Today, the Linux Foundation launched the x402 Foundation to standardize internet-native payments for AI agents, APIs, and applications, based on Coinbase’s contributed x402 protocol. Backed by companies including AWS, American Express, Cloudflare, Google, Mastercard, Stripe, and Visa, the effort aims to make payments work directly over HTTP (assuming users are comfortable letting AI agents handle financial transactions).

“The whole idea is to give agents access to money and, through that financial independence, improve their set of capabilities to pretty much anything on the internet,” Lincoln Murr, Coinbase’s AI product lead, told CNBC last month when the company announced the protocol. “In the 2010s, every internet company dealt with the transition from desktop and web into a mobile environment. And now in the late 2020s, we’re seeing the exact same thing happen where agents are going to be the new primary economic actors on the internet.”

I have an idea

By CEC-P • Score: 3 Thread
Name it Copyright Violation Coin and put it on the blockchain! Btw, AI agents are the most gullible things I have ever seen, except the scrapers that grab the data are even worse. Not only do they suffer from nonstop version confusion, quoting 5 different steps to fix an HP printer from 5 different generations that had 5 different menu structures, but they’re susceptible to “ai tar pit traps.” Now imagine it’s one you charge for. And per-page it has an AI generating fake-ish data for the other AI to scrape. This will not work!

OnePlus Is Reportedly Shutting Down In the US, Europe

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
OnePlus will reportedly announce this week that it is shutting down its brand in the U.S. and Europe, following months of signs that parent company Oppo was winding down the brand’s global presence. India and China are reportedly unaffected, but it’s unclear whether Oppo will replace the brand directly in those markets. The move also raises questions about future support for existing OnePlus users. 9to5Google reports:
WinFuture reports that OnePlus is gearing up for an official withdrawal from the U.S. and European markets, with the announcement due in the “coming days” this week. Closed-door press conferences have apparently happened, with no details shared on the exact reason OnePlus as a brand is shutting down in these markets. India and China are, as far as this report claims, not affected. The report, citing “well-informed sources,” notes that this OnePlus announcement will come amid “fundamental changes” to Oppo’s strategy, but the big point here is the global death of OnePlus.

OnePlus is a Chinese smartphone manufacturer

By RobinH • Score: 5, Informative Thread
If, like me, you didn’t know who OnePlus was.

RAM costs

By alvinrod • Score: 3 Thread
I wonder if it’s the memory costs that did them in. They tended to make devices for the higher end of the market and putting 16 GB in a phone is going to be incredibly expensive for a company that can’t manufacture their own memory chips or drive enough volume to get discounts on purchases or preferred treatment from memory manufacturers.

I’m not an Android user, but the OnePlus 15 that they released last year was a good device that was well regarded. I know a lot of other posters here have had good things to say about them over the years as well. Hopefully they’re able to rebound from this and can continue offering great products.

Re:OnePlus is a Chinese smartphone manufacturer

By MachineShedFred • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

They literally sold phones in the US for a decade or more, sometimes with better hardware than the “big boys” and not locking you out of bootloaders and 3rd party flashes but that’s ok.

I still have my OnePlus 9 Pro with the pop-up selfie cam and an actual full-screen front with no stupid notch or hole. Fantastic hardware. I look forward to it continuing to be useful under LineageOS for years to come.

So what are our options now?

By devslash0 • Score: 3 Thread

So what are sensible options left to us mortals now?

- iPhones are a very aquired taste.
- Samsungs are annoying bags of bloatware.
- Custom ROMs no longer pass SafetyNet reliably…

IBM Stock Collapses After a Grave Warning About AI

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
IBM shares plunged after the company warned that Q2 revenue and earnings would miss expectations, blaming customers’ sudden shift in spending toward AI hardware instead of software services. However, CEO Arvind Krishna did not place all the blame on IBM’s customers. The CEO also said it “faltered” by failing to “anticipate the magnitude of the capex reprioritization.”

“These conditions require our teams to execute perfectly, and this quarter we faltered. We did not adapt and move quickly enough, and numerous large deals failed to close on the timelines we expected, driving the majority of our shortfall.” Fast Company reports:
In the preliminary report, IBM said that for its second quarter of fiscal 2026, it expects revenue of $17.2 billion, which is up 1%. It also said it expects a Non-GAAP Diluted Earnings Per Share (EPS) of $2.93, up 5%. However, as noted by CNBC, these preliminary results are below what analysts were expecting, which was $17.86 billion in revenue, and an EPS of $3.01, according to FactSet data.

Re:good self awareness

By Gramie2 • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

I don’t know the details, but IBM has been switching its emphasis from hardware to services for quite a while. They sold off their Lenovo brand in 2014.

Lots more profit in services, as any customer who has had the misfortune to hire them has (to their sorrow) found. Like the Quebec Ministry of Transport, whose project to digitize car and driver licensing is years late and has topped $1.1 billion. Yes, billion. Thanks IBM (and SAP)!

IBM’s answer will be: chop chop chop

By hwstar • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Layoffs are coming.

Historically this is what IBM has done in the past to improve profitability.

I view this current debacle as a failure on management’s part to see what might be coming up in the sector as emerging tech just like layoffs are a failure of management to properly size the company and select the proper roles which drive growth and ultimately profitability.

Will management pay with their heads? That ultimately depends on the board, and maybe the shareholders.

Re:good self awareness

By jd • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Good question. Their POWER series of CPUs were not insignificant in capability, their chip designers were clearly technically sophisticated, and GPUs are just specialised vector processors with a few extra bells and whistles - stuff IBM is extremely familiar with.

It would not have been difficult to release a GPU or other LLM-specific processor to go along with the POWER11. They’d been working on the POWER11 for 4 years, they knew in 2020 that LLMs had a strong potential to be significant for Big Data processing - an area you use big iron for, they’re not rank amateurs, they have plenty of reserve, they could have assembled an emergency team to build a vector processor that was custom-designed for just LLM work, and released an LLM processor card that could run circles around nVidia.

They didn’t. Because, as has happened before, their management is simply too stupid and too slow.

It’s temporary.

By supabeast! • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

IBM is still in fine shape. The company is not losing money. Revenue did not fall off a cliff like the stock price did. If they’re smart IBM can wait this out and quietly prepare for things to bounce back when the insane AI capex ends and people need something IBM is ready to provide. (But, realistically, IBM will just lay off 25,000 good people instead of putting human capital to good use as part of a long term strategy.)

Indian Bumbling Manipulators (IBM)

By JakFrost • Score: 3 Thread

Any IBM project I’ve seen in the last two decades has been filled with outsourced Indian consultants that put in the hours warning their chairs and accomplish nothing only to be replaced by another bumbling Indian to do the same when there is no progress and complaints come in from management and new time extension contract needs to be signed for when time and materials exceed the estimated costs until the project fails.

IBM SameTime, Lotus Notes Mail server upgrades, Z/OS migrations, x390 upgrades, P-Series hardware refresh, TADDM CMDB inventory, BigFix patch management failures, and the list goes on. All IBM products and projects that I’ve had to help fix, implement, maintain until replacements can be installed and IBM garbage ripped out.

Teaching IBM mainframe consultants how to FTP files to their mainframe filesystem partitions to upgrade the z/OS shows how low that company is sunk after it moved to India since it fired all of their local US talent and mainframe guys.

Any project that IBM touches goes IBM Blue(TM) from asphyxiation and withers away and dies.

Now they are losing to AI on their inept services and software projects after failing to anticipate that is just par per course for their consulting business. Just as bad as Deloitte.

Microsoft is following on their heels now also, full of outsources and offshored Indians and people wonder why Windows 11 sucks so hard?!

The US techies are left scrambling for the few leftover IT jobs here to be taken over by AI after they implement the death knell for their back-office working bretherent. They are building their own AI terminators, first for the non techies who are the clerks and analysts, but then for themselves to snipe each other out of the few remaining jobs in the future maintaining the AI IT infrastructure.

New York Becomes First State To Impose Data Center Moratorium

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
New York has become the first U.S. state to impose a moratorium on large new data centers, pausing construction for one year over concerns that AI-driven data center growth is raising utility bills, straining water supplies, and burdening communities. “As data center development threatens to hike up utility bills, deplete our natural resources, and create uncertainty for New Yorkers, it’s my responsibility to take action and lead,” said New York Governor Kathy Hochul. She will also pursue legislation to repeal sales tax exemptions for large data centers, Hochul added. Reuters reports:
The construction ban will apply to data centers that use 50 megawatts or more of power, officials in the governor’s office said. During the moratorium, the state’s Department of Environmental Conservation will not issue any discretionary permits not already deemed complete, the governor’s office said. Instead, Hochul directed state officials to develop a Generic Environmental Impact Statement to ensure that new data centers coming online are held to “consistent standards,” as well as examine the potential environmental impacts of the construction and operation of data centers in the state. The ban will be lifted once the state finalizes those standards, according to Hochul’s office.

Curious

By Anonymous Coward • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

How charging EVs will break the power grid but operating gigawatt slop datacenters is essential?

Praise be

By SumDog • Score: 3, Interesting Thread
Despite electing a communist mayor in their largest city, it seems like the state government is making a solid good move here. We already have way more capacity than China. I high doubt any of the current model hosting providers are anywhere near capacity or have growth curves even approaching them. It’s all investment fraud and NY is doing the right thing to put a hard break on the newest Tulip Mania

StubHub, CEO Hit With ‘Deceptive Practices’ Class Action Over Mass Scalping

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from the BBC:
StubHub and its CEO, Eric Baker, have been hit with a proposed $5-million class-action lawsuit in the United States over the company’s ties to large-scale scalpers — connections reported by CBC News last week. The suit, filed Monday by New York ticket buyer Louis Sanquini, alleges deceptive practices and fraudulent misrepresentation over StubHub’s promoting itself as a “marketplace for fans to buy and sell tickets.” The online ticket resale giant has faced a storm of customer complaints after cancelling thousands of World Cup tickets. The company has repeatedly said it is simply a technology platform that does not buy, sell or possess tickets. However, CBC reported last week that Baker disclosed in recent filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission that he runs Andro Capital, a hedge fund that engages in large-scale resale of millions of dollars’ worth of sports and concert tickets on the StubHub resale platform.

Sanquini filed the proposed class action in the Southern District of New York, arguing consumers were kept in the dark and that he believed StubHub was a “neutral” marketplace. Lead counsel Kevin Steinberg told CBC News in an emailed statement that “consumers deserve honesty and transparency.” A CBC investigation found that the CEO of online ticket reseller StubHub owns and manages a hedge fund that scalps millions of dollars of its own tickets. “While what StubHub is alleged to have engaged in and perpetrated upon millions of patrons is unfathomable, this case is about transparency and consumer trust. If companies make representations to the public, consumers are entitled to expect that those representations are complete and accurate,” he said.

The claim reads: “Defendants’ failure to disclose this conflict of interest, while affirmatively marketing StubHub as a fan-to-fan marketplace, deceived Plaintiff and the Class and caused them to pay prices, and accept terms, they would not have accepted had the truth been known.” Sanquini argues that had he known StubHub’s CEO held a financial interest and that the company was helping finance professional resellers, he would never have used the resale site to buy tickets to see rock band Kiss in 2023 or to attend a New York Red Bulls-New York City FC Major League Soccer match in 2024.

$5 million is laughably low

By blastard • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

This should not be filled asking for a mere $5 million. It looks a little like a fake suit to get him and them off the hook. Even if they settled for the full amount they are getting off easy.

Crank it up

By Bahbus • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

StubHub valuation: ~$4 billion
Eric Baker net worth: ~$800 million

This class action should be seeking a minimum of 20% of the company’s value as well as 50% of Eric Baker’s net worth.

Indian Scientists Produce Most Detailed 3D Atlas of the Human Brainstem

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Scientists at the Indian Institute of Technology, Madras (IIT-M) have created what they describe as the world’s most detailed 3D cellular atlas of the human brainstem, linking whole-brain MRI views to individual neurons across more than 500 tissue sections. The free online atlas, called Anchor, could help researchers better understand diseases such as Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, stroke, and SIDS by showing how healthy and diseased brain tissue differs cell by cell. The BBC reports:
Built from high-resolution microscope images rather than costlier molecular techniques, it creates a detailed three-dimensional map of the brainstem, identifying more than 200 clusters of brain cells and nerve pathways. Eight chemical markers help distinguish different cell types, producing one of the clearest pictures yet of this vital, but poorly, understood part of the brain. The brainstem occupies only a sliver of the brain, yet it keeps people alive. It links the brain to the spinal cord and controls breathing, heartbeat, sleep, wakefulness and movement.

[…] Users can zoom from the whole brainstem seen on MRI down to individual neurons while maintaining their precise spatial relationships. The researchers have made the atlas freely available online, hoping it becomes a reference tool for neuroscientists, neurologists and neurosurgeons worldwide. Its applications could also extend well beyond anatomy. By comparing healthy brainstem maps with diseased tissue, scientists may better understand disorders ranging from Parkinson’s disease and stroke to Alzheimer’s disease and sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). More precise maps could also help neurosurgeons navigate one of the brain’s most delicate regions with greater confidence.

“The” or “A”?

By fuzzyfuzzyfungus • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
I don’t want to diminish the accomplishment; that seems like a very cool dataset and probably one that was really fiddly to pull together; but, if you are talking single-neuron resolution; I am curious about whether you can still call an individual sample “the human brainstem” rather than “a human brainstem” and what comparative purposes you can use it for without running into trouble with cases where there are multiple ways for a brainstem to be adequately healthy, so long as certain requirements are met, so you’ll need considerably more samples to draw useful inferences about exactly what the problem abnormality is.

Same sort of thing as when “sequencing the human genome” was a big project. Obviously a major exercise in gene sequencing and a basis for situating subsequent sequencing operations; but once you start talking detail there isn’t ‘the human genome’; literally everyone has one; and it turns out that different differences matter or don’t at radically different levels.

Presumably the methods used to do it once will be helpful in doing it more often in the future; but I’ll be curious what we discover about the balance of ‘normalcy’ vs. some relatively subtle and confusing combination of surprisingly variable ways to have a brainstem that seems to work just fine along with surprisingly subtle, no ghastly big lesions, ways to have one that ends up being totally dodgy.

Put it in a book, you cowards

By 602 • Score: 3 Thread
There is a marvelous book that I look at in the library every year or so: “The brain stem of the cat; a cytoarchitectonic atlas with stereotaxic coordinates”, Berman, Alvin L.; Madison, University of Wisconsin Press; 1968, 175 pages 80 illustrations *59 cm*. Yeah, the book is 2 feet tall, much larger than any of my computer screens.

Scientists Find Sugar Deep In Our Galaxy

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Astronomers have detected erythrulose, a sugar found in raspberries and self-tanners, in a gas cloud near the center of the Milky Way. While not essential for life itself, the molecule can convert into a form thought to be important for life’s origins, adding evidence that key prebiotic ingredients may be widespread across the galaxy. The Associated Press reports:
Using two dish-shaped radio telescopes in Spain, researchers collected data from a large gas cloud near the center of the Milky Way. They identified the sugar in gas form by comparing telescope signals to samples in the lab. It’s the latest kind of sugar detected in space — in a region crossed by NASA’s twin Voyager, the farthest spacecraft to ever travel from Earth.

Scientists have found interesting chemistry in our galaxy, including building blocks for genetic material and parts of the cell. They spotted a cousin to table sugar near the center of the Milky Way about 25 years ago, and black grains from asteroid Bennu retrieved by NASA’s Osiris-Rex spacecraft yielded other sugars, including a key DNA ingredient. The latest sugar isn’t essential for life, but can easily convert to a form that’s thought to be crucial to kick-starting life on Earth. And it’s one of the most complex sugars spotted so far, said astrophysicist Erika Hamden with the University of Arizona.
The results were published in the journal Nature Astronomy.

That’s it, I’m leaving

By jfdavis668 • Score: 5, Funny Thread
Going to move to a sugar-free galaxy.

Sugar In The Milkyway

By SlashbotAgent • Score: 4, Funny Thread

Milkways are indeed super sweet. They have a lot of sugar in them.

It might cause diabetes but they are soooooo good.

In addition

By kencurry • Score: 3 Thread
Astronomers noticed that the sugar was concentrated on massive flake-shaped exoplanets that reside in what’s known as the “bowl region” in the Milky Way.

Over 200 Economists Say ‘We Must Act Now’ On AI’s Economic Impact

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from the Associated Press:
Hundreds of economists say in an open letter that institutions "must act now” to address how artificial intelligence could transform the economy and could put many people out of work. The statement released Monday was signed by top economists, along with computer scientists and some executives at tech companies including Anthropic, Google and OpenAI.

“AI may become radically more powerful over the next 10 years,” says the letter organized by Stanford University’s digital economy lab. “This could drive an unprecedented transformation of our economy, larger than the Industrial Revolution, but unfolding over a vastly shorter time frame. It could bring risks, including large-scale job displacement, as well as opportunities such as major gains in living standards.”

The letter, which has only four sentences, says leaders must “build the incentives, guardrails, and institutions needed to steer AI in a direction that complements humans and benefits society.” The Stanford lab says the letter has so far been signed by more than 200 economists and AI researchers, including 16 winners of a Nobel Prize.
“We must be intentional and make collective, democratic choices, rather than letting market forces play out and risking leaving most citizens behind,” wrote computer scientist and AI pioneer Yoshua Bengio, who was also among the signatories. He said it “it is highly plausible that AI will drastically transform our economies.”

Other signatories include Google CEO Eric Schmidt, LinkedIn cofounder Reid Hoffman, and Nobel laureates Joseph Stiglitz, Daron Acemonglu, and Simon Johnson.

200 Economists

By rossdee • Score: 4, Informative Thread

If all the economists in the world were laid end to end, they wouldn’t reach a conclusion.

Re:LLM output is Grey Goo and Ecophagy.

By Rei • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

They weren’t discovered by an LLM. They were known conjectures that were proven by an automated solving language that was linked to an LLM.

I’ll take “Things That Didn’t Happen For $200”, Alex.

Only a handful of meaningful proofs have ever been done by automated formal theorem solvers (the Four Colour Theorem being the most noteworthy example - but its proof is so long that humans can’t verify it). By contrast, AI tools have been solving Erdos problems en masse. The majority of them just bog-standard commercial models. In case you need help, the only ones on that list that were hybrid (AI / non-AI) in the actual solving phase are:

1) AlphaProof / DeepMind Prover Agent / AlphaProof Nexus
2) Aristotle (Harmonic)
3) Seed Prover / Seed Prover 1.5 (ByteDance)
4) AxiomProver (Axiom Math)

In each of the above, LLMs come up with the lemmas / strategies but then use Monte Carlo search (“brute force”) or likewise to investigate what they came up with. These are a minority. In the “AI Standalone” category, these “hybrid” tools made up only ~20% of attempts and successful proofs. Hybrid tools actually made more of a contribution in the “AI Alongside Literature” (related literature found afterward) and even more of the “AI Building On Literature” (related literature known beforehand) categories, which is the opposite of what people like you expect.

And even with the hybrid tools, it’s still the AI doing the heavy lifting when it comes to strategy. Non-AI theorem solvers, again, don’t have a spectacular record for churning out novel proofs to unsolved problems. Tools like Lean are more about mathematical rigour - a passive environment that requires a driver (a human or AI) to feed it actual strategies, lemmas, and proof steps. And no, you cannot brute force “strategy” in the vast majority of cases, which is, again, why automated theorem solvers don’t have much of a track record with unsolved mathematical problems.

Let’s take a random example: the disproof of the unit distance conjecture. It was solved purely by a general purpose commercial GPT model, not custom-trained to mathematics, with no external tools. Read what the various mathematicians reviewing / commenting on it have to say (sections #3 and onward). Seriously, don’t skip reading them, actually read them. This was one of Erdos’s favourite problems. He mentioned it commonly in his lectures. Essentially every mathematician working in complex geometry has thought about this problem. The approach that the model came up with was highly novel approach, based on CM-fields and class field towers.

I know you don’t want to accept this reality, but it is the reality, so you better improve your ability to accept it,. The field of mathematics is already doing so.

Over 200 Economists

By DarkOx • Score: 3 Thread

Allow me Fix the headline!

Over 200 Economists Embrace Sensationalism To Drive Ad Impressions on Blogs and Substack Subscriptions.

Re:Lots of magical thinking here

By allo • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

“There is not even reason to expect LLMs to be still a thing in 10 years.”

Bullshit. Even if development would stop right now, people would use the existing tools the next 10 years and beyond. Even if their usage won’t get better (hardware not getting cheaper and more efficient anymore) many of them run on affordable hardware that is worth the benefit brought by the tool.

I won’t want to bet on the increase continuing like it currently goes for ten years, but people will surely use LLMs and image AI in ten years.
I also think that if current development stops, you can still increase the usefulness of current models by building good harnesses. Current ones are experimental, more complicated than needed and chaotic what to use when.

If you look at professional software, Photoshop doesn’t have great tools because the algorithms are that great, but because they added duct tape at all rough edges of the algorithms. Currently LLM and image AI is getting better too fast that we would even start at duct taping their flaws, because the next model fixes them anyway. But if the growth slows down, we will see tools that improve the use a lot without improving the underlying model.

I also neither believe in AGI, nor in us needing AGI for more than showing it is possible.

Why don’t they propose solutions?

By oumuamua • Score: 3, Interesting Thread
Because these economists have only studied, by design, capitalism. They can’t even think of anything else. Here are some leads:
1) Stop persecuting Left leaning countries like Cuba, we admit the West is out of ideas, let Cuba’s idea play out without sanctions and interference.
2) Look to the past, all this has played out before in the Gilded Age, Marx, the Depression & New Deal, the 60’s, BTW you must read The Iron Heel, the deje vu is immense https://www.gutenberg.org/eboo…
3) People looking at real ideas:
Grace Blakeley, Vulture Capitalism: Empire, Bailouts, Monopoly Power https://www.youtube.com/watch?…
Clara Mattei: The End of Capitalism is Here https://www.youtube.com/watch?…
David Shapiro: Post Labor Economics: https://www.youtube.com/playli…

Microsoft Promises To Fix Search With Major Windows 11 Overhaul

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Microsoft is overhauling Windows 11 search to prioritize local apps, files, and settings over web results while removing ads, promotions, MSN/Bing clutter, and other distractions. “You’ve have been asking for search that is faster, more relevant, and easier to use — whether you’re opening an app, finding a file, or changing a setting,” Microsoft says in a new blog post. “Because the Windows Search Box is where many people start, we focused first on making results more dependable, easier to scan, and clearer before you click.” Windows Central reports:
The company is highlighting several key improvements, including clearer results that does a better job at showing why a search result is appearing when a query has been typed, alongside prioritizing local results before reaching out to the web.

Search is also getting better at handling things like typos, which should help surface the right results even when the user misspells an app or file. The search home pane will no longer show MSN or Bing content, and promotional content and ads will no longer appear in search results.

These upgrades are now rolling out to Windows Insiders in the Experimental Channel, and are expected to roll out to all Windows 11 users later this year. Insiders may not see the changes right away as they are rolling out in waves.
The full list of changes can be found here.

I can’t Wait!

By oldgraybeard • Score: 5, Funny Thread
For the “Just ask Clippy” advertising campaign.

Uh huh

By liqu1d • Score: 5, Funny Thread
Have they tried AI?

Re:For Insiders on the Experimental channel

By crunchy_one • Score: 5, Informative Thread
According to the Microsoft document, the sole thing they’re doing to reduce ad clutter is, “Promotional content has been removed from web results. Web results show the most relevant answer, instead of first showing related products and promotions, helping search feel more focused and less distracting.” And even that has this carve out, “NOTE: Experiences vary by region.” So, all you get is some slight relief using search, and even that depends on where you happen to live.

Re:About frackin’ time.

By ArchieBunker • Score: 4, Informative Thread

It already exists. https://www.voidtools.com/

Returns results as fast as you type and can even index network drives. I’ve been using it daily for years.

Re:For Insiders on the Experimental channel

By ArchieBunker • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

It means they’ll fix it for the EU but won’t do anything for the USA.

US Government Warns That Russia State Hackers Are Coming After Your Router

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
CISA and allied governments are warning users to secure their routers as Russian state-backed hackers continue compromising the devices and turning them into proxy nodes to disguise attacks against critical infrastructure. The advisory urges users to disable outdated SNMP versions, use strong passwords, update firmware, and turn off unnecessary router services to reduce the risk of being swept into these botnets. Ars Technica reports:
“Russian Federal Security Service (FSB) Center 16 cyber actors continue to exploit poorly configured and vulnerable networking devices worldwide, opportunistically compromising multiple critical infrastructure sector networks,” the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency said Monday. The hacking groups are tracked under various names, including Berserk Bear, Energetic Bear, Crouching Yeti, Dragonfly, Ghost Blizzard, and Static Tundra. The advisory was co-issued by governments from around the world, including Australia, Denmark, New Zealand, and the UK.

The primary means of compromise the agency warned about was hackers scanning IP ranges with active Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) agents that accept common or default authentication credentials. These scans are run by the very sorts of router botnets the actors are trying to enroll the targeted device in. By sending malicious traffic from spoofed addresses, the hackers can use the SNMP agent on poorly configured routers to run malware. SNMP allows users to collect and organize information about managed networking devices or to modify that information to change device behavior.

With control of a device, the hackers then use it as an exit node when probing or attacking targets in the communications, defense, energy, financial services, and government sectors. By funneling the malicious traffic through a benign-appearing device on a trustworthy IP address, the attackers are able to lower the chances of getting blocked by firewalls and other security defenses. Monday’s advisory made no mention of identical operations carried out in recent years by China. So-called residential proxies are also a go-to tool used by financially motivated criminal hackers to obscure their true IP address. In many cases, these sorts of proxies are made up of millions of streaming devices that are sold with preloaded malware.

Re: distract - distract - distract

By sdinfoserv • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
If Trumpy and company were that concerned about Russian Hacking, perhaps the should not have cut CISA’s budget by 3/4 of a billion dollars. https://www.afcea.org/signal-m…

Re:Shouldn’t this be expected?

By sarren1901 • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Don’t the ISPs own the wires? If so, then I would expect the state to first tell the ISP to clean up their properties. Have them show due diligence in getting their customers to update or replace (with what, from who?) their router before eventually kicking it off the network.

My last cable ISP supplied a router/modem combo that they could configure to be secure by default. For the most part, it was. It didn’t have a lot of features and I didn’t care for it’s overall design but it did work.

My current ISP is starlink and they provide the receiver and router as well.

I imagine the vast majority of router’s that are Internet/ISP facing are issued by ISPs themselves as your average user doesn’t go buy their own. Even us nerds, we buy our own but depending on our ISP, it’s still behind their router/modem device in the path from client to Internet.

So if ISPs are issuing the majority of devices, it would make the most sense for the state to be working with these ISP on updating the default settings and pushing out updates or otherwise helping customers update their gear. Let’s hop to it people!

Re:fix your router, we’ll trust you

By PPH • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Show of hands: How many people sat in on Hegseth’s phone call regarding this topic?

Re:Upgrade

By Kernel Kurtz • Score: 4, Informative Thread

I am glad I finally retired my older Asus router last year, even though it was running a reflash, and installed a Unifi gateway at home. They seem to be very good with updates. I even turned on the Threat Detection and Blocking (Intrusion Prevention). Then also GeoBlocking (yes, I know they can work around that, but why make it easy?) The nice thing is this little box does everything I had before and TONS more, including running cameras, with no cloud-dependencies and no recurring fees.

Unifi has had several CVSS 10.0 vulnerabilities lately. Quite a lot of those devices are unfortunately still ending up part of botnets.

https://www.bleepingcomputer.c…

And a new one last week…

https://thehackernews.com/2026…

Nice hardware, but the cloud services bring their own risks.

Re:standard practice

By Bert64 • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Setting the policy to DROP just means that clients will try multiple times before timing out, which means not only will you waste bandwidth with the retries, but your own clients will experience a delay while they time out instead of receiving an instant rejection.

For legacy IPv4 networks the address space is so congested and in short supply that it’s economically unviable to leave unused addresses, so you gain nothing from this. With IPv6 there might be some very limited security-through-obscurity value to someone not being able to identify a live address, but its also not practical to scan sequential address space anyway.

What this article really highllghts however, is how flawed the perimeter security model is. Modern end user devices will actually do perfectly well on an open connection, as they don’t have any externally visible services. Indeed people frequently connect their devices to public wifi networks where they are fully exposed to the network owner, other users and potentially beyond and it hasn’t caused the apocalypse.

People are relying on the perimeter security model, and then using really lousy insecure devices to actually implement that perimeter so they get the worst possible outcome. User think their devices are inside a secured perimeter when the very device supposed to be enforcing that perimeter has been compromised putting the attacker inside. These devices are often MUCH worse than today’s end user operating systems.

The proper solution is zero trust - assume your devices are fully exposed and have to stand alone.

German Firm Files For Insolvency After Cybercriminals Shut Down Production For 6 Weeks

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
German textile firm ZEGO has filed for insolvency and is blaming a March cyberattack that shut down production for nearly six weeks. “ZEGO’s filing adds another name to the short but growing list of companies that say a digital break-in was commercially fatal to their business,” reports The Register. From the report:
In a notice to customers and suppliers, the organization said it had exhausted every available option before seeking insolvency protection. Managing director Johannes Zenglein described the filing as “one of the most difficult steps in our company’s 37-year history.” “The cyberattack of March 29, 2026, however, impacted our company to an extent that we could not fully compensate for despite our best efforts,” Zenglein wrote. “The consequences resulted in a production outage of nearly six weeks and significant financial strain. These effects ultimately impacted our financial situation so severely that filing for insolvency became necessary.”

ZEGO did not disclose what kind of attack it suffered, whether ransomware was involved, who was behind it, or whether customer or employee data was compromised. What it has made clear is that the operational disruption alone was enough to push the business beyond the point of recovery. ZEGO said insolvency proceedings have now been initiated, but insisted the filing does not necessarily spell the end of the business. It said it plans to keep production running while administrators attempt to restructure the business, preserve jobs, and keep customers and suppliers on board.

Re:Why were critical systems not replaced?

By rsilvergun • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
The article talked about the cost of customer confidence lost too. In other words even if they came back online the 6-week pause would have caused them to lose a bunch of customers. And they don’t have the capital to get them back through advertising campaigns and discounts and such.

It’s actually terrifying how many businesses run at the absolute edge of margins and are perpetually on the verge of collapse. Like how any given city is 3 days away from chaos…

We focus on the tech companies that are making so much money that they literally cannot spend it fast enough. And that also like to keep a ton of cash around for stock BuyBacks. But it really doesn’t take much for most companies to start cutting staff and even shutting all the way down.

This is both how and why increasing interest rates “fights” inflation. Businesses lose access to credit because it costs more to loan so any little problem in their business immediately becomes a major disaster because of credit crunch and they go under putting a whole bunch of people out of work. Those out of work people spend less reducing demand which slows inflation. If the business doesn’t collapse outright it’s at least going to do layoffs and pay cuts which achieves the same goal.

Re:Why were critical systems not replaced?

By znrt • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

if a 37 year old company can’t survive 6 weeks of shutdown and not even get credit to weather the storm and get back on their feet without defaulting on obligations it suggests to me they were already operating on fumes and the cyberattack and aftermath were just the final blow … and ofc a very convenient explanation for that default.

Blaming the wrong thing.

By Gravis Zero • Score: 3 Thread

“The consequences resulted in a production outage of nearly six weeks and significant financial strain. These effects ultimately impacted our financial situation so severely that filing for insolvency became necessary.”

That’s a funny way of explaining that they neglected to implement proper security measures and backup measures for decades.

This is ultimately what wishful thinking and downplaying the importance of cybersecurity gets you.

Nobody is immune

By serafean • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Nobody is immune, survival is about planning, and a bit of luck :
In 2017 Maersk almost got destroyed: notPetya wiped their systems, including domain controllers. Luckily a power outage in ghana kicked the local DC offline during the attack, and thus the sole remaining copy was perserved. Talk about luck.

https://www.wired.com/story/no…

Re:Why were critical systems not replaced?

By AmiMoJo • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

6 weeks of shutdown for a manufacturing company is not something that is easily survivable. Customers will be looking for alternative suppliers, and many won’t switch back. Contracts may have delay and non-fulfilment clauses. Few places are going to have 6 weeks of stock to cover such an event.

What seems unforgivable is that it took 6 weeks to fix.

States Sue to Block Paramount-Warner Bros Merger, Defying DOJ

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot
A coalition of 12 states led by California is suing to block the $111 billion Paramount Skydance-Warner Bros. merger, arguing it would reduce competition in theatrical distribution, blockbuster films, and basic cable licensing. The challenge (PDF) defies the DOJ’s approval of the deal. Variety reports:
The coalition, led by California Attorney General Rob Bonta, alleges that the $111 billion transaction violates the Clayton Act by lessening competition in three distinct markets: wide-release theatrical distribution, “top-grossing” theatrical distribution, and basic cable licensing. “The unlawful merger of these two entertainment behemoths would lead to higher prices, lower quality, and less content for film and television, harming movie theaters, basic cable distributors, and ultimately, audiences on every sofa and movie theater seat in the U.S.,” Bonta said in a statement on Monday.

The suit argues that the combined company will control 27% of the wide-release theatrical distribution market, 30% of the submarket comprising “anticipated blockbuster films,” and 27% of the basic cable bundle. The states argue that such consolidation will harm theaters and cable and satellite providers that rely on competition among distributors. Paramount and Warner Bros. are two of the five remaining legacy studios. Together, all five — including Disney, Sony and Universal — control 86% of theatrical distribution and 90% of blockbuster distribution, the states said. Warner Bros. and Paramount are also the second- and third-largest basic cable distributors, respectively.

[…] The states are expected to seek an injunction to block the transaction, which Paramount expects to close sometime after July 22. The 12 states in the coalition are Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, and Washington. […] All are represented by Democratic attorneys general.
“Consolidation here not only leads to higher prices — it also leads to fewer opportunities for important stories to come to life, and fewer ways for audiences to encounter stories, ideas, and perspectives beyond their own experiences,” Bonta said. “In this country, no one is above the law. With this lawsuit, California and our sister states are fighting for free and fair markets, not rigged markets. America has no kings in government or our economy.”

Re:Let it burn

By bussdriver • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

1. Blockbuster films help fund other films and a lot of people like them enough to have them make money or crash and burn a ton of cash… They shouldn’t succeed simply because they have a 30% marketing budget which is ridiculous because of the film’s pile of money.

Yes, it makes bland stuff to appeal to the lowest common denominator and they don’t have to run their business on massive bets; perhaps if people were not such gullible consumers?? FX doesn’t draw people in as much…
Also, those expensive films pay a lot of people to make them although a ton of money is not going to the FX people. The bankable movie stars get too much for their brand. That is on the public… The big unspoken cost is the business managers who take massive profits while probably encouraging the hate on the stars they resent having to pay high wages to. They are also trying to replace every writer, artist, and actor with AI so they can keep all the money for themselves. Think it’s bad now? Wait until they have zero push back from their interference which is the biggest reason films suck today. The formula committee and exec producer created shit that ruined everything is going to have a suck up AI following orders… not sneaking around the system to add memorable scenes to Forest Gump disobeying the bean counter’s “artistic” vision.

2. Cable TV is not great and they make you buy channels you don’t watch (or hate or are actively destroying the USA.) but the cable model with ads funded tons of TV shows that were good and had niche markets. Now the whole business model is shot, TV shows of the past are not possible; just some on broadcast TV or the HBO model (also might die.) Youtube shows make no money and have to beg for donations just to fund a tiny staff without stability or capacity to produce much. So now you have tons of choice and is it really cheaper?? I know people who pay as much or more now than before and they don’t rave about quality improvement - plus they admit to watching a lot of old content from before “modernization.”

The real problem: People are overly entertained. We are amusing ourselves to death. You shouldn’t see so many videos that everything is a rehash. That said, if you pick the best of every plot or genre, we don’t need any more new content if you consumed it in moderation. One thing I’ve noticed in decades in education is that we have far fewer people with actual hobbies. Pure consumption is not a hobby. Get a hobby and you won’t have time to see all this content slop… and it was slop before AI started learning the patterns that was turning it into slop already.

Re:What about Netflix?

By The-Forge • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

At this point they see Netflix as the way lesser of 2 evils.

Re:Translation

By machineghost • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Do you have any non-propaganda, unbiased evidence whatsoever that consolidating into fewer companies will in any way result in greater production of creative works?

Because if not, perhaps you should consider the possibility that the statement you quoted isn’t actually propaganda (it’s just a statement of fact).

Re:Let’s see

By jonwil • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Its all about making sure that CNN ends up in the hands of a Trump ally who will turn it into a Fox News clone and destroy a major thorn in the side of Trump and the republicans. Anything else that might happen is secondary to that.

Re: Let it burn

By karmawarrior • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

“These days”

They’ve all been engineered since Heaven’s Gate bombed, and certain franchises have always been engineered. There was even a book on how to write generic blockbuster, called Save The Cat!, that became an industry bible in the early 2000s, with scripts being rejected if they didn’t follow the formula, which gave a page by page description of what needed to be there.

But… complaining they’re engineered is like complaining that rollercoasters are engineered. Nobody goes into a MCU or Bond or even a John Wick movie expecting some amazing piece of meaningful artistry. Hell, if they did, the number of people interested in them would reduce dramatically, because the last thing most of us want to do after writing Java for 5 days and trying to relax on a Friday evening is to think. People want fun escapism sometimes, because life right now sucks more than it’s done in 30 years for most people.

“Are they worth saving?” So you’re telling me that you feel that giving a group of billionaires more control over what you watch and what information you get because you don’t see any cultural or entertainment value in The Beekeeper? That’s your argument?

Really?