Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Google Struggling to Make AI Mode Searches Pay
  2. Ink Droplets In Motion Snag Top Prize In Nikon Small World Contest
  3. Bank of America Kindly Asks That You Don’t Share Your Password With Your AI Assistant
  4. Anthropic Engineer Declares the Coding Interview Dead
  5. Massive Leak Exposes 41,000 Homeland Security Workers
  6. Amazon Puts a Camera In Its Echo Studio So Alexa Can See
  7. Are AI Execs Too Out of Touch To Build For the General Public?
  8. Amazon Finds ‘Tokenmaxxing’ Lacks Productivity Gains
  9. Apple Announces Its First Touchscreen MacBook Pro
  10. EMACS Turns 50
  11. FCC Approves Amazon Leo’s $11.5 Billion Acquisition of Globalstar
  12. Google Begins Certifying Registered App Stores For Android
  13. Astronomers May Have Just Discovered Our Solar System’s Sixth Dwarf Planet
  14. CDC Warns of Rising Threat of Drug-Resistant Germs
  15. Greenhouse Gas Levels Set Records In 2025, UN Says

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Google Struggling to Make AI Mode Searches Pay

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Alphabet shares fell nearly 10% after Google disclosed that searches through its AI Mode generate less revenue than traditional search, even as overall search revenue grew 12% year over year to $63.25 billion. The Register reports:
Alphabet on Wednesday reported its Q3 results, which included news that its year-over-year search query growth rate is the highest it’s been in the last five years. Some of that growth comes from users adopting “AI Mode” — Google’s latest LLM-powered search system. Google’s revenue from search rose 12 percent year-over-year to $63.25 billion, a little lower than the 14.5 percent growth the company reported in last year’s Q3.

During Alphabet’s earnings call, chief business officer Philipp Schindler said the slowdown was caused by “lower monetization we were seeing in AI Mode.” That’s a worry given that Google is spending enormous sums on infrastructure. $51.4 billion went out the door in Q3, around two thirds of it going towards servers and networking equipment. The rest funded datacenter builds. That spending appears to have impacted profitability, as Alphabet reported $26.17 billion net income for the quarter. Last year’s Q3, during which Google revenue was $102.35 billion, produced $35 billion net income.

Schindler argued that AI search will pay off. “On AI Mode, many of these queries are upper funnel queries, allowing us to capture new, high-value commercial intent,” he told investors. “In addition, the majority of AI Mode queries are incremental, creating more monetization opportunities over time.” Google tried to seize one of those opportunities today, by turning on ads alongside AI Mode searches around the world, after first testing them in the US only. But for now, AI Mode searches aren’t as lucrative as Google’s existing search business, which brought in just under half of Alphabet’s $125.8 billion quarterly revenue.

Is any company managing to make AI anything pay?

By Finallyjoined!!! • • Score: 3 • Thread

See title.

Good News Everyone!

By belg4mit • • Score: 3 • Thread

Maybe they’ll finally stop shoveling this shit down our throats? Maybe?

Such a surprise. Welcome to the party

By gweihir • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread

Looks like basically nobody using AI can make it pay for itself. If they are honest.

Search engine company can’t do search

By Arrogant-Bastard • • Score: 4, Informative • Thread
They had one job, many years ago, and at the time, they did it rather well. Now they can’t do anything well: they’ve turned their search into AI slop (use DuckDuckGo or StartPage instead), Gmail is one of the world’s top spam sources, Google Groups is garbage, their cloud outages keep increasing in severity and frequency, they’ve killed off too many projects/services to count, and their CEO is a fascist thug who kneels before Trump and obeys his every command.

If any part of your computing practice or operation depends on Google, it’s time to move somewhere else.

Amusingly

By Zak3056 • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread

If you ask Gemini why Google’s search results have gotten so bad, it will give you an honest answer and suggest you use DuckDuckGo instead. Not exactly sure how you monetize “our service is telling our customers to go to our competitors instead” unless you’re Macy’s and you’re in a Christmas movie.

Ink Droplets In Motion Snag Top Prize In Nikon Small World Contest

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
A 25-year-old German photographer won the 2026 Nikon Small World competition with a microscopic image freezing ink droplets in midair as an inkjet printer deposits them onto paper. Ars Technica reports that Ole Bielfeldt “beat out 1,802 other entries hailing from 69 different countries.” From the report:
Bielfeldt became interested in photomicrography during the COVID-19 lockdown after discovering an old microscope in his parents’ attic. He figured out how to build an adaptor out of a tube and some wood to connect the microscope to his father’s camera and taught himself the art through trial and error, building custom tools as needed. He documents how he captures transformative images of everyday objects with behind-the-scenes videos posted to macrofying, his photography and videography brand.

It was Bielfeldt’s curiosity about the inner workings of inkjet printers that inspired his winning entry, but capturing the action of ink drops being deposited on paper was a challenge, given that the process happens so quickly. The droplets, for instance, moved faster than the camera’s shutter speed. Bielfeldt’s solution was to deconstruct the printer so that the paper moved under a stationary (rather than moving) printhead, and then take the image in a dark room, using a flash to serve as the shutter, thereby freezing the ink drops mid-air. There was no need for pricey equipment. Bielfeldt does not use AI in his images, preferring to rely on traditional techniques.
“Ole Bielfeldt’s winning image embodies what makes Nikon Small World so powerful: the intersection of microscope imaging, ingenuity, and artistry,” said Eric Flem, a spokesperson for Nikon Instruments. “By using a microscope objective in a different way, he transformed a familiar object into something altogether new and previously unseen. It is a reminder that the microscope is not only a scientific tool but also a creative one, capable of expanding how we see and imagine the world around us.”
The full list of winners can be found here.

Wow

By drnb • • Score: 4, Informative • Thread
Wow. a news for nerds story that is actually pretty damn cool. Even a summary that is interesting.

Looks like a cool background for intro credits

By drnb • • Score: 3 • Thread
I don’t know why, but it looks like a cool background for a movie or series into credits.

Bank of America Kindly Asks That You Don’t Share Your Password With Your AI Assistant

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Longtime Slashdot reader schwit1 shares a report from TechCrunch:
In an email blast to customers titled “Protecting your finances in the Al World,” Bank of America urged customers to never share their username and password with another person or an outside service, "including an Al-enabled tool or agent that offers to act on your behalf.” […] A spokesperson for Bank of America confirmed the authenticity of the bank’s email that was posted to social media. But heed the bank’s warning, for if things go wrong, it’s on you. Account agreements at most banks hold customers responsible for anyone they give their log-in to. “If you do share your credentials,” its email reads, “keep in mind that you’re responsible for activity resulting from that access.”

A fool and their money are soon parted

By jhoegl • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
Happens way more than people think.

How abysmally stupid do you have to be …

By gweihir • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

… to even only seriously consider doing that? These people are operating on the level of totally deranged cultists.

Finally …

By drnb • • Score: 3 • Thread

Bank of America Kindly Asks That You Don’t Share Your Password With Your AI Assistant

Finally, good advice from too-big-to-fail banks. ;-)

Anthropic Engineer Declares the Coding Interview Dead

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
An Anthropic engineering manager says he has stopped using traditional coding interviews because AI can now outperform candidates on the kinds of programming challenges they typically contain. “There’s no more point in giving you a little React challenge than there is in quizzing people about assembly; Claude is now better at both,” said Felix Rieseberg in a blog post. “Our most impactful builders are successful regardless of how good they are at these tests.” The Register reports:
“I don’t think the coding interview is going to come back,” said Rieseberg. “It’s easy to get sentimental given how many copies of ‘Algorithms and Data Structures’ were bought in hopes of unlocking good jobs and a better future — or how the death of the coding interview is another milestone in software engineering reaching a new level of abstraction.”

At the same time, he’s not certain what will replace it. “I’m probably not the only manager trying to figure out how to interview for people who build well with AI,” Rieseberg wrote. “I haven’t quite gotten there yet — but I’m scanning resumes and portfolios for little prototypes that exhibit taste, empathy, and principled thinking. If you have figured out something better, I’d love to hear how.”
In a response posted to social media, Jaana Dogan, principal engineer at Google, said: “I’m not doing a ton of coding interviews nowadays but I’d be interested to interview how people use coding agents,” she wrote. “That itself gives me more signals about candidates’ coding skills.”
“We are not seeing tech companies abandon skills assessments widely across the industry — at least not yet,” added Nicole Bachaud, labor economist at ZipRecruiter. “In fact, based on our October 2026 Employer Survey of 1,500 employers, we see the tech industry (Information sector specifically) is actually the most likely to test for skills, with 62.5 percent of employers requiring formal skill tests on initial applications.”

“The change at Anthropic might be reflecting a shift away from technical skills towards more human, soft skills,” said Bachaud. “As AI becomes fully capable of writing code, tech employers may be pivoting away from rote technical testing and heavily toward human-centric soft skills.” She argues that while AI may be able to code well, it can’t replace critical thinking. “A staggering 61.5 percent of Information employers now report that ‘critical thinking’ is a primary skill lacking in today’s candidate pool,” she said.

Still an Extremely Good Signal for Senior Eng

By hutkept • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
Coding interviews test for fluency. You don’t give coding interviews to someone to see how good they are, i.e., variation in speed is fine, you are looking instead for how well they decompose problems, abstract and structure things to make them tractable, and yes, whether coding is second nature to them. People who do extremely well in coding interviews are also going to do extremely well coding with AI. Is the converse true? This is where AI has made things tricky. If the engineer is supposedly experienced and senior, then yes, i.e., if they have not become a good coder by now, something is wrong, and you don’t want to bring whatever that is into your project. However, if the engineer is very junior, than not necessarily, they may have chosen to spend their time on more important things than “learning assembly”. Therefore, ironically, it is the senior engineers and more experienced folks who you get the best read on by doing coding interviews, but you do still get a good read on them this way.

Re:From one dev manager to another

By Brain-Fu • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

I have worked with junior level devs who just take a dev task’s requirements, hand it straight to AI, put that through basic testing (only the main intended cases) and then offer that up as a finished solution. The solution was, of course, full of holes, some of them quite serious, just not obvious. The holes were in the edge cases and how it handles and recovers from errors. These were exactly the kinds of mistakes I would expect a junior level developer to make (in at least one case I am thinking of, the task shouldn’t have even been handed to someone so inexperienced, but the people making that decision didn’t really know how advanced the task was and anyway the dev wanted to get real experience).

So, our process worked because we had senior level human code review, which caught these. But the real risk here is that without such experienced senior level people to do that review this would have seemed like a “slam dunk” where AI saved a whole lot of time and eliminated the need for expensive veterans on the team (only to fail catastrophically in production as soon as something hiccupped). This is what I am most concerned about. Companies will fall for this. Especially new companies where leadership is just as inexperienced at running a tech business as the cheap vibe coders they hire.

So if we are hiring people who will be using AI to do most of the coding work, I think we need to test the thoroughness of their thinking, their ability to detect unspoken problematic edge cases and know to focus on them when reviewing the AIs output, and the ability to recognize dangerous vagueness in requirements and ask for clarity. Also, the ability to mentally translate between “business speak” and “tech speak” is extremely valuable.

Though I still don’t feel right about skipping a proof of coding skills. I just don’t think we are yet at the point where it is safe for someone who can’t code to be relying on AI to get it right. The aforementioned senior developers doing the code review are all people who have been coding by hand for years, and in order for such people to continue being available to do code reviews in the future, we need to make sure we hire people who can do this.

Not surprising to me

By jenningsthecat • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

“A staggering 61.5 percent of Information employers now report that ‘critical thinking’ is a primary skill lacking in today’s candidate pool,”

I’m an old fart so I may be totally out to lunch on this one, but I get the impression that most of today’s schools really don’t teach students to think, question, analyze, and synthesize. I think this applies across all subjects, not just in technical ones.

Part of me thinks that the ones who DO know how to think and analyze are tilting the table against subsequent generations by under-funding education, healthcare, and nutrition. If you look at today’s parasite class - many of whom are in the tech field - you see that their political attacks on taxpayers getting any of the benefit from the money they’ve paid are increasing. The broligarchs want it all for themselves, and I think they see AI as a stepping stone toward making the bulk of humans now living on Earth expendable. I think that it’s in their plans to expend a whole lot of us.

And replace them with what?

By evslin • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

If you don’t know what to replace a coding interview with, then you aren’t a “thought leader” as they like to call themselves on LinkedIn - you’re just trying to make the rest of the industry dogfood your product for you while your company loses amounts of money equivalent to the GDP of small countries every year.

In the meantime, I still need to know if an applicant knows how to code, because if they get an LLM to write something for them and it’s shit, I’m not yelling at their LLM, I’m yelling at them. So, the coding interview stays.

Re:Not surprising to me

By gweihir • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

It has always been like that. In fact, most of those claiming they want to hire critical thinkers actually are not critical thinkers themselves and do not want to hire any. Critical thinkers have always been rare, they are inconvenient, they tell you that you are doing things wrong. There are very few people that want to hire such people and these are critical thinkers themselves. But these people tend to get not promoted and eventually removed from an organization and hence the circle of mental incapability continues.

Massive Leak Exposes 41,000 Homeland Security Workers

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
A massive leak has exposed records tied to more than 41,000 DHS employees and contractors, including roughly 10,000 ICE personnel. The data, reportedly taken from DHS’s Okta login system, reveals phone numbers, email and office addresses, reporting relationships, and permission groups associated with undercover operations, wiretapping and surveillance tools. Wired reports:
In all, the leak provides a map of how DHS is organized and how it operates. The records, which span DHS itself as well as seven component agencies, including Immigration and Customs Enforcement and US Customs and Border Protection, were last updated on August 19, 2026.

The transparency nonprofit Distributed Denial of Secrets and cybersecurity researcher and journalist maia arson crimew previewed the data to WIRED, which they say they obtained from a group calling itself the Department of Peace. DDoSecrets published the archive, which it calls “Icepick,” on Wednesday. In a press release, DDoSecrets says the data is from DHS’s Okta login system. In a note with the files, the hackers wrote, “They have our information, so it’s only fair that we have theirs.” An Okta spokesperson tells WIRED that it is unaware of any breach of its systems. “We are aware of this report. Okta is secure, and we have no evidence our data or systems were compromised,” the spokesperson says.

Re:Leftists in Prison

By Anonymous Coward • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

aw honey

doesn’t it get old inventing imaginary enemies?

when the courts say that someone is a ‘sex trafficker’, that’s not ‘leftists’. The court isn’t ‘leftists’. You have enough enemies without inventing new ones. don’t be greedy.

Oh No!

By Local ID10T • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

It could not have happened to a more deserving bunch.

Welcome to the panopticon. Be seeing you!

Re:Public domain data is now public domain

By Zero__Kelvin • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread
I agree that ICE Agents should pay for their crimes, but don’t you think you execution for insubordination might be taking it a bit too far? It seems like a couple of decades in prison for their treason should be enough. The prisoners will take it from there.

Re:Public domain data is now public domain

By Arrogant-Bastard • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread
“Why though? These aren’t elected officials, they aren’t political positions. Why should their information be any more public than who your employer is (assuming you don’t work for yourself in a small family owned business)?”

Because those of us who work for governments (which I’ve done, twice) are public servants. We are accountable to our supervisors and their supervisors and so on, but that chain of accountability ultimately ends with the citizens of the city/county/state/province/country that pays us. We are required, by basic professional ethics, to always keep their best interests in mind, and — in my view — to put their interests ahead of our own.

In both the cases I mentioned above, not only was my basic personal information available to everyone — name, address, position, etc., — but so was my salary. As it should be: the people paying me have the right to know what they’re paying me, and what they’re paying me for.

Re:Oh No!

By gtall • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

On the other hand, you the future Social Security recipient, will get increasingly taxed because you made the U.S. unwelcoming for immigrants and migrants. What precisely is it that you object to? Them coming here and working their tails off, raising families, paying taxes, etc., essentially acting like good citizens.

But maybe we’re fucking Christian Nation, able to look a poor migrant in the eye and tell them to enjoy the Love of Jesus Christ on their own because they won’t be getting any of it from you.

Amazon Puts a Camera In Its Echo Studio So Alexa Can See

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Amazon has added a camera to its Echo Studio speaker, allowing Alexa to visually identify objects, help with tasks and remotely monitor a room. For those concerned about privacy, Amazon is keeping a camera-free version available. The Next Web reports:
The camera speaker ships today for $249.99. Hold up a board game box and Alexa can explain the rules, or show it a box of cereal and it can help you reorder it, according to Amazon. Owners can also check in on the room from the Alexa app while they are away. The Echo Studio without a camera stays on sale at $219.99.

A dedicated button turns off the microphones and any camera, and a visual indicator shows when a camera streams images or video to the cloud, Amazon said. Certain features require Alexa+, which is included with a Prime membership.
Other devices Amazon unveiled today include an Echo Time alarm clock, an Alexa Photo Frame and the Echo Show 16.

Nope!

By LondoMollari • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

AI already knows enough about me without seeing my half nude midnight runs to the fridge.

Ha Ha Ha

By SlashbotAgent • • Score: 4, Informative • Thread

I had an Echo Dot given to me. It sat unopened on my desk for a couple of years. Then I recycled it, still in the original unopened box.

Now they’ve added a camera? Ha ha ha ha.

But seriously; why would anyone buy that thing? I know that many people will. But why?

The dedicated button…

By dskoll • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

A dedicated button turns off the microphones and any camera

Yes. For sure it does. Absolutely. Scout’s honor.

CORRECTION

By JustAnotherOldGuy • • Score: 3 • Thread

“A dedicated button turns off the microphones and any camera”

CORRECTION: “A dedicated button CLAIMS to turn off the microphones and any camera”

And if you believe that horseshit, come on over and I’ll sell you the Golden Gate Bridge at a super-cheap price.

Are AI Execs Too Out of Touch To Build For the General Public?

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from TechCrunch:
Former Yahoo CEO and early Google engineer Marissa Mayer is catching a lot of flak for how she uses AI. In an interview about her new app Dazzle, an AI assistant that learns from your camera roll, Mayer poses what she believes is an impressive flex for the product: It helped her come up with three bullet points about her 10-year-old daughter for a birthday presentation at school, describing her as “empathetic, creative, and an animal lover.”

It’s a vague description, like a generic horoscope — it could probably describe a lot of 10-year-olds. Some onlookers, like progressive activist Leah Greenberg, marveled that “the fact that Marissa Mayer would voluntarily disclose this to a reporter is a pretty good demonstration of how deeply the culture of Silicon Valley has diverged from the rest of humanity.” […] After publication, Mayer defended herself in a long X post. She claims she was not relying on Dazzle to explain her child to her, but rather, she was testing what her prototype could do — it resurfaced photos of “forgotten kindergarten projects,” like a “snake devenomer” or “sandcat playground,” illustrating her daughter’s creativity and care for animals.

Fair enough. But Mayer remarks in the same interview that people could also use her AI to outsource the mental load of “figuring out the theme for your child’s birthday party.” She says she’s used her app to plan a playdate for her daughter, book family activities on vacation, and decide what to be for Halloween. She even proposes that her AI assistant could coordinate plans with her husband’s AI assistant. When the reporter asks her if it’s depressing to imagine this “frictionless future planned by AI,” Mayer replies, “I haven’t really thought that through.”
The bigger question is: What should we outsource to AI? “What feels like grunt work to someone might be a meaningful part of parenthood for someone else,” says Fortune’s Emma Hinchliffe.

Michael Tasner, Founder and CEO of No Joke Marketing, adds: “Customers are drowning in AI slop, and they can spot it. Use AI for the low-stakes work behind the scenes. Keep the moments that matter to your customers human. Human connection is becoming the new premium.”

Wrong question.

By fuzzyfuzzyfungus • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
It seems likely that the answer to this question is ‘yes’; but it seems like a mistake to be distracted by it when we are talking about people who are, busily and intentionally, building ‘AI’ products against the public.

It’s mildly comical when they attempt to emulate humanity; but the important bit isn’t the cluelessness; it’s the malice.

Something wrong

By fropenn • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
There’s something wrong if the pressure to get ‘just the right birthday party theme’ requires too much ‘mental load.’ Maybe just try asking the child, and then do basically whatever they want? Doesn’t really require much mental load.

But I suppose the real pressure comes from having to top everyone else with dramatic, over-the-top social media photos of The Most Amazing Birthday Party Theme of All Time and Aren’t I Just the Most Amazing Mother / Parent to Walk on Planet Earth? Like and subscribe.

Everyone would be much happier if you just threw that stupid phone and its lame AI app in the recycling bin and got on with living your real life with the real people right in front of you.

Money changes you

By wakeboarder • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

When your whole life is focused on that, you really lose sight of what is good for other people, you’ll make decisions on what is good for your bottom line and then deal with the fallout. We have seen this time and time again from the tech industry, take social media for an example (We’ll enslave humanity if it increases ad revenue). AI as a product is nice now because no enshittification yet. They are currently still trying to get their hooks into people with freemium models, once they need to extract revenue it’s going to get scary.

Re:Wrong question.

By jenningsthecat • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread

It’s mildly comical when they attempt to emulate humanity; but the important bit isn’t the cluelessness; it’s the malice.

With a little less context your statement would be deliciously ambiguous; my first fleeting thought was that you were referring to the LLMs. Then my eye caught the word “malice”, and I understood.

I’ve been having a LOT of interaction with GoogleAI and ChatGPT lately. At first glance they seem human - as do the aforementioned C-suite occupants. On deeper examination though, it becomes obvious that both groups are - in a very disturbing way - not quite human.

The models have a valid excuse for living in Uncanny Valley. But the parasite class? Not so much.

The behavior only makes sense when you realize…

By BitterEpic • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

The behavior only makes sense when you realize that it is all about getting investor money. Keep in mind that investors are giving a sh*t ton of money that would normally be considered a movie gag. It’s literally free money and people are showing just about anything that they think that investors will bite on. This explains *all* behavior. It isn’t any more complicated than that. Everyone knows there is a bubble, but talking about it isn’t going to get you that sweet VC.

I’m also going to repeat: the rotton core of America is coming from Wallstreet. The rewords for business regarding AI is all coming from there and there needs to be some reforms… I don’t really need my 401K investment money being used to try to create technology to remove my job *before* I retire. But for some reason I don’t get that choice in the American economy?

The businessmen have taken over silicon valley. It is no longer about people trying to make people’s lives better. It is no longer about fun. It is no longer about making a business that will stand the test of time. It is about where to funnel that venture capital.

Amazon Finds ‘Tokenmaxxing’ Lacks Productivity Gains

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Ancient Slashdot reader Gilmoure shares a report from Tom’s Hardware, adding: “Huh. Looks like consuming one’s own slop does not turn the wheels of industry.” From the report:
Amazon wants its engineers to quit chasing token counts, warning that heavy AI usage does not automatically mean better work. In updated engineering guidelines published on October 27, the company laid out how developers and managers should gauge AI’s real impact — and the takeaway is blunt: consuming more tokens is not the same as delivering more value. […]

According to the memo, metrics such as AI adoption rates, token consumption, code changes, and code reviews become “deeply flawed” when they are disconnected from actual results. Turning them into targets, Amazon says, encourages wasteful behavior that clashes with its emphasis on “frugality and simplicity” and can raise both compute bills and software complexity.

The company’s preferred yardstick is long-term results. “We believe that it is best to measure, and be measured by, long-term outcomes,” Amazon wrote. That does not mean managers should ignore usage data altogether, as input metrics remain useful when examined “with care and judgment” alongside other indicators. Amazon suggests looking at both the teams using AI the least and those using it the most to determine whether adoption is translating into better delivery.

[…] The memo also pushes back on the idea that every task needs an AI tool. If current tooling does not benefit someone’s work, Amazon says, that is “a finding, not a failing.” Engineers who can explain where today’s tools fall short are demonstrating judgment rather than reluctance to adopt AI.

from the files of “No Shit Sherlock”

By haruchai • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

how did the idiots who made the policy ever get hired?

Organizations suboptimize to meet new metrics

By spazmonkey • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

Studies show it takes 30 days for employees suboptimize efforts to adjust output to get results that fit new performance metrics.
Its not just that THIS performance metric was pants-on-head stupid. Its the entire idea that a new performance metric will accomplish anything other than employees tailoring efforts to meet that new metric at the expense of job performance and meeting actual organizational goals.

Re: from the files of “No Shit Sherlock”

By ArmoredDragon • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread

Cheese…This whole time I literally thought token maxing meant getting the most bang for your tokens. No joke. I never bothered reading anything about it because nothing about my job ever said “use no more than x tokens” and nobody ever said I was using too many. The work objectives have always been the deliverable, not how we delivered it. The only restriction we have is the obvious: Sandbox it, and don’t just give it everything.

Re:Organizations suboptimize to meet new metrics

By Martin Blank • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

My employer announced that AI costs will be billed back to departments. Token use (almost entirely among developers) was cut in half without affecting productivity, and perhaps even enhancing productivity because they had to think a bit about the best use of what they had instead of trying random things.

Re:Wally and his minivan

By drnb • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

My take is the people going to business school are just generally dumb with big egos. Teaching cannot fix that. In a STEM subject, they would just get washed out. But business schools would be empty if they did that, so they do not and instead do massive damage to society.

My real world experience is that business school changes very few people. They are overwhelming the same coming out as they went in. And IIRC 60% of the incoming are STEM. Many of the professors having STEM backgrounds from the pre-academic careers.

Business school is very different than traditional master’s programs. It has no deep dive. It is a multiyear shallow survey of many of the specialties within a large organization. If there is any common thread it is in human psychology, motivation and leadership, organizational behavior. And like I’ve said previous. They teach the futility of these magic bullets to increase productivity in class after class, regardless of topic, as an undertone.

As for the STEM that never go to business school. They are just as susceptible to the siren’s song of the new paradigm of the day. Finding their brilliant revelation in a business book from the airport convenience store. Literally. An absolutely brilliant programmer f*cked up his team for about a year and a half this way. I saw some of his highly intelligent and experienced bend to what they knew was wrong because it would effect their reviews. Its the same crap STEM or no-STEM. Its the same stuff you read in harvard business reviews in business school. Its just plain human reality.

Apple Announces Its First Touchscreen MacBook Pro

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Apple has unveiled its first touchscreen MacBook Pro, reversing a position the company held for more than 15 years that touchscreens were poorly suited for laptops. 9to5Mac reports:
The new machine features a light-up Apple logo, tandem OLED, and touch input on the display. It runs on the M5 Pro and M5 Max chips, like the existing MacBook Pro models without OLED touch displays. John Ternus, who is rocking a new profile picture with the new Mac, shared the first look at the new machine on X. Pricing for the new laptop starts at $2899 for the 14-inch model. The 16-inch version starts at $3399.
Pre-orders are available starting today with deliveries starting November 6.

Pre-Greased

By TwistedGreen • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

The spectacular PROLED XDR display features an industry-leading tandem OLED panel that provides up to 2000 nits peak HDR and SDR brightness, a 10,000,000:1 contrast ratio, and a wider color gamut covering both P3 and Adobe RGB.

It would be a shame to get your avocado-greased fingerprints all over such a display!

Re:Pre-Greased

By angel’o’sphere • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread

It probably works with a simple touch pen?
I bought one for 50 cents in Thailand.
Rarely use it on my phone, but might be useful on such a touch screen.

Does anyone like touch screens on a notebook?

By Murdoch5 • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
I can’t think of a single time I have ever wanted a touch screen on a notebook, or desktop computer. There is a use for touch devices, like drawing tablets, pen inputs, and the like, but who wants to touch their screen? Does anyone actually have a use case for a touch screen, that can’t be better served with a device that prevents it?

I’m sure there are good uses for them, I just can’t think of one. There was an idiotic notebook that had two screens, and one was a touch screen, so you could use a virtual keyboard, that thing SUCKED! One of my old bosses loved it, and bought a bunch of them, but you had to plug a keyboard in to have any chance of using it.

I’m not talking about tablets, or phones, or other IoT style devices where a touch screen is very sensible.

Apple Pencil

By drnb • • Score: 4, Funny • Thread

It probably works with a simple touch pen?

But the cool kids will have a $79 Apple Pencil, or better yet a $129 Apple Pencil Pro. ;-)

You know what guys?

By 93 Escort Wagon • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

I suspect this is not for people like us (most of us anyway). This is for younger people - people who grew up with iPads and smart phones. I’ve never wanted a touchscreen laptop, but I have seen lots of young people who don’t use computers much try to touch the screen on a computer. It isn’t particularly efficient, but it is what a lot of young people expect… not having it introduces a point of friction.

EMACS Turns 50

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
"EMACS, the mother of all editors, turns 50!" writes Slashdot reader dr_jerry, sharing a report from MIT Technology Review:
Programming used to be a very different experience from the one we know today. In fact, the first programmers didn’t write code at all; the six women who worked on the ENIAC, one of the world’s first computers, at the University of Pennsylvania in 1946 did it by physically configuring switches, cables, and plugboards.

A few years later, MIT engineers programmed the Whirlwind by punching code onto paper tape that was then loaded into the computer’s memory — making it among the first “stored-program” machines. Later, they and others moved on to punch cards, one for each line of code.

By the early 1960s, programmers with interactive computers could use a “line editor” to type their code on teletypes — large, noisy keyboard-and-printer machines. They’d type one line of code at a time, and their work would be saved on a spinning hard disk the size of a modern washing machine. But there was still no such thing as the now-familiar full-screen text editors that allow programmers to see and modify many lines at a time on a display.

One of the first such tools, EMACS, turns 50 this year, and it is still widely used. EMACS first ran on the early video terminals at the MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory in 1976, but its core concepts were so powerful that it was rewritten for many operating systems in the decades that followed. Apple even distributed it with Mac OS X. Beyond that, the software-sharing community that started around EMACS helped give rise to the modern-day free software movement and the GNU/Linux operating system.

50 is fitting

By Tarlus • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

Coincidentally, nobody over the age of 50 has the finger dexterity to operate it.

Re:Thanks EMACS

By alvinrod • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread
If vi was any good, they wouldn’t need to improve it.

Not that filthy EMACS users are any better. Both should be purged. Nano master race raise up!

Re:Thanks EMACS

By rstanley • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
I am 71 years old, and yes, I still use it to program in C. Not commercially anymore. And yes, I hate VI and all of its variations! ;^)

Works very well for me. I have created and installed several extensions that work well for me!

And no, I do NOT use AI at all for any reason! I program to exercise my mind! And I will as long as I can!

“Coincidentally, nobody over the age of 50 has the finger dexterity to operate it.”
Bull$#!t! I do have very good dexterity! ;^)

I did learn C so many years ago on an original, two full height 5 1/4 floppy, IBM PC, using edlin! ;^)

Happy Birthday emacs! ;^)

the power!

By thegreatemu • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
I am one of those users hated by all sides of the editor war, because I prefer emacs but use it almost exclusively as a plain text editor, like using a nuclear plant to charge my phone. Because I have never found another editor that does automatic C++ indentation anywhere close to as intelligently. Press tab, and it inserts the correct number of *spaces*, the end. If the indentation isn’t what you expected, 99% of the time it’s a missing parenthesis or bracket. There are plenty of linting tools out there to auto-indent a file, but none that will do it as you type so far as I have ever found.

Re:vi is the best editor

By tlhIngan • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

Also vi came out that exact same year: Bill Joy wrote it at Berkeley. So I suppose you could argue that your choice is a bit like early rapper culture: east coast vs west coast!

vi is a patch to ed. Remember most terminals were teletypes that output a line at a time, so you used “ed” to edit lines one line at a time. (And likely an inspiration for the brilliant MS-DOS edlin editor). But fancy new video teletypes were becoming a thing, and it was actually possible to display multiple lines of text on the screen at a time. Bill Joy added visual mode to ed to take advantage of this so you can visually display and edit blocks of text rather than a line at a time.

Tools like grep came about from ed as well.

ed-mode is fundamental to vi when doing commands like search and replace.

Want some fun? Set your terminal to TTY mode and try using vi. Depending on how good the emulation of vi is, it might work in line-at-a-time mode or not at all.

FCC Approves Amazon Leo’s $11.5 Billion Acquisition of Globalstar

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
The FCC has approved (PDF) Amazon Leo’s $11.5 billion acquisition of satellite operator Globalstar, giving the Starlink rival additional infrastructure and spectrum to expand into direct-to-device satellite connectivity. Engadget reports:
You may not know Globalstar but have possibly used its services, as the company provides Apple’s emergency satellite connectivity for compatible iPhones and Watches. Interestingly, Apple also held a 20 percent stake in Globalstar prior to its takeover. As part of the deal, Leo will power satellite services for supported iPhone and Apple Watch models.

Leo, a rival to SpaceX’s Starlink, has been active of late. The company recently announced that it has 400 satellites in orbit and revealed last month that it had launched high-quality satellite internet service in Uzbekistan. It’s teaming up with Delta to eventually bring satellite internet to flights, as well. Amazon recently added six new Arianespace launches and aims to have more than 3,000 low-earth orbit satellites up in the near future, still well short of SpaceX’s 11,000 satellites.

Globalstar is so different

By kriston • • Score: 3 • Thread

Globalstar is so different.
L-band uplink and S-band downlink.

Doesn’t seem a good fit for Amazon Leo (nee Kuiper).
I’d like to learn more.

Gives Ukraine an alternative?

By Snert32 • • Score: 3 • Thread
Maybe if Ukraine has an alternative to StarLink, Musk can’t cut off their options to defend from Russia’s incursions. Ukraine still has the challenges, but an option here is very helpful.

Google Begins Certifying Registered App Stores For Android

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica:
Running an app ecosystem has gotten a lot more complex for Google after its loss in the Epic Games antitrust case. While U.S. users can access app stores in Google Play by court order, international users will use Google’s voluntary Registered App Stores program. Google has announced that stores wishing to be part of that program are now free to apply, and support will roll out to some Android devices later this year. App stores accepted into the program will enjoy preferential treatment on the Android platform. Users of approved stores will be able to install apps with a single click, similar to the experience in the Play Store. These stores will also be allowed to update apps silently in the background like Google’s store does.

[…] Registered App Stores are still happening on Android, but they won’t be supported in the U.S. — you can go to Google Play for alternative stores stateside, but so far, Aptoide remains the only one listed. Those operating Android app storefronts who want to be included in the international program can now review the program and begin the enrollment process. Any store hoping to get approval will have to adhere to a number of requirements, including protecting intellectual property, removing illegal content, and publishing a privacy policy for both users and developers. Google also requires several ongoing security measures to ensure the stores do not give malware easier access to Android devices. As part of the application process, store operators must provide documentation for all these points (in English) and upload copies of all their apps.

It costs $10,000 per year to participate in the Android Registered App Stores program, and that fee must be paid before Google will review the application. Google says this fee covers the additional support necessary to run the program. There may also be additional review fees if Google detects a store has a problem with malware. Google plans to roll out support in dozens of nations, which includes most of the world outside of the U.S. and Europe. The program goes live on December 1, but it will only work on Android devices running the latest builds of Android 17. Google says support will start with Android 17 QPR2, which is expected to arrive on Pixel phones in the coming weeks.

10000 a year!

By AcidFnTonic • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

10k a year fuck right off with that bullshit. These are all roadblocks you idiots put up so removing them costs nothing you sniveling fuckers

Thanks Sweeney

By DewDude • • Score: 3 • Thread

Now take Epic games and fuck right off. You’re not doing this for us....everything you do has fucked the consumers. You’re doing it for yourself youselfish asshat.

This won’t last long

By thegarbz • • Score: 4, Funny • Thread

As much as I hate that fucker Tim Sweeney I’m sure he won’t settle for a US only win, and if he lodges a complaint in Europe the EU will certainly have things to say about Google, a certified gatekeeper under the DMA demanding a $10k participation fee.

I’m not sure which lawyer approved this at Google but I suspect they are counting on making enough profit in a short time to offset the almost certain fine they will get.

Re:10000 a year!

By flink • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

Totally agree, but if it costs google anything, then $10k doesn’t cover it. Even if 10 independent stores sign up, $10k/store doesn’t even cover a single FTE for a year, and they will probably need a small team to run this this program. The $10k is not there to “cover costs” as they say. It is there to deter small open source groups from running their own store. It really does feel targeted at F-Droid.

Astronomers May Have Just Discovered Our Solar System’s Sixth Dwarf Planet

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Astronomers using the Vera C. Rubin Observatory have discovered 2026 ED138, a large object beyond Neptune that could become the solar system’s sixth recognized dwarf planet if further observations confirm it is massive enough to be round. Located about 46 times farther from the Sun than Earth, the object is estimated to be 600 to 1,500 kilometers wide and had remained hidden because it lies against a particularly crowded field of Milky Way stars. Scientific American reports:
The discovery was made by running billions of pieces of data collected by the Rubin Observatory through a search code developed by Center for Astrophysics | Harvard & Smithsonian astronomers Matthew Holman and Kevin Napier. “My first reaction was one of excited disbelief,” Holman said in a statement. “Objects like this are very rare, so I immediately started checking whether I or the code had done something wrong.”

When Holman and his colleague Mario Juric of the University of Washington went to double-check, they found 30 more observations of the object by Rubin that dated to between March and July 2026. Looking at other observation tools, the pair found even more sightings going back to 2016. Together, these data allowed the astronomers to begin mapping out 2026 ED138’s orbit. The suspected dwarf planet is about 46 times as far from the sun as Earth, making it even more remote than Pluto, which is just 40 times as far. The object is also tilted off the solar system’s plane by around 25 degrees, an arrangement that could be linked to disruptions caused by Neptune’s gravitational pull.

Initial measurements indicate that 2026 ED138 has a diameter between 600 and 1,500 kilometers (373 and 932 miles), which makes it one of the largest dwarf planet candidates yet detected. But size isn’t all that matters: further observations are required to determine if the object has enough mass to be pulled into a round shape, which is a key requirement for a dwarf planet. Despite its size, 2026 ED138 was able to avoid detection for all these years because it’s located in a part of the night sky that’s crowded with stars whose light drowned it out.

Re:Pluto is a planet

By thegarbz • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

False. A dwarf planet is not a planet. It’s a completely exclusive definition incompatible with the definition of a planet. Both share a parent definition of a celestial body, specifically a planetary-massed celestial body orbiting a star. But that’s it.

You looking at words in isolation desperately crying crocodile tears over Pluto has nothing to do with the scientific definition. You can adopt the correct definitions, or you can be incorrect.

Re:Occultations?

By canavan • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread
No. Even with many stars, the angular size of a dwarf planet is so small that you have to at the right location on earth to see specific occultations when/if they occur. When they do, it may be possible to determine the size and shape by spreading observers accross the path of the occultation and precisely timing the start/end. Stars will be points in any case.

Re: Occultations?

By beelsebob • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

Up until very recently we’ve not really been looking at large areas of the sky repeatedly every night. There were likely thousands of occultations and we just didn’t see them because we weren’t looking at that particular bit of the sky when they happened.

Vera Rubin came online a few months ago, and has precisely that job - to take images of a large portion of the sky with a very wide angle very high resolution camera, and compare them every few nights. The result⦠oh look - there’s a dwarf planet, not just occulting things, but reflecting light.

Re:moon

By Rei • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

Speak for yourself, Pluto is fascinating. Tectonically active. Cryovolcanism so abundant it appears to have formed large mountains by the merger of individual domes. A gigantic scar exposing its mantle, which over time roils in massive convection cells, pockmarked in sublimation pits. Mountains drifting like icebergs and accumulating on the shore. Penetentes (sublimation ice spikes), the size of large hills. A multilayer blue atmosphere, in which organic chemistry occurs, depositing not just organic matter onto its own surface, but that of its moon as well. Active glaciation. A probable subsurface ocean, in contact with rock. Conditions suggesting it was habitable when it formed.

IMHO, it’s way more interesting than a number of recognized planets.

(Also, I’m confused by your response. This isn’t about the moon, and the moon has no atmosphere for flying)

Re:Pluto is a planet

By SlashbotAgent • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

Do you know that The Moon of America is three times larger than Pluto?

CDC Warns of Rising Threat of Drug-Resistant Germs

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
The CDC estimates that 19 drug-resistant pathogens cause 9.7 million infections and more than 50,000 deaths annually in the U.S., with resistance continuing to outpace development of new treatments. “The agency considers this problem to be one of our most urgent public health threats,” reports NBC News. From the report:
The report is the CDC’s first comprehensive assessment of these drug-resistant pathogens in seven years. […] The new report offers a detailed picture of these threats in the U.S., including a ranking of which are the most urgent concerns, based on the number and severity of infections they cause and how easily preventable or transmissible they are. The ranking also factors in how many treatment options exist and their costs. […] The report estimates that 19 drug-resistant germs cause 9.7 million infections annually in the U.S. Of these, four pathogens are ranked as most worrisome, including the fungus Candida auris and the bacteria that causes gonorrhea, which has become resistant to all but one class of antibiotics used to treat it.

The other two urgent threats, according to the CDC, are the bacteria Acinetobacter and Enterobacterales, both of which are resistant to a class of antibiotics widely considered a “last resort” for patients. In addition, the report adds a new bacteria to the list of “concerning” threats, which are considered less worrisome but still warrant monitoring: neisseria meningitidis, which causes meningococcal disease. The rare but life-threatening illness can be prevented through childhood vaccinations, but the bacteria that causes it is slowly developing a resistance to penicillin and another antibiotic called ciprofloxacin.

The report also offers some good news: The CDC determined that the bacteria Clostridioides difficile, or “C. diff,” which causes diarrhea and inflammation of the colon and can be deadly, is causing fewer cases year over year. The agency downgraded it to a serious threat, whereas it was categorized as urgent in the prior version of the report, which came out in 2019.

Defund the CDC

By backslashdot • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

Then we won’t have to deal with being informed about germs.

Re:Do we know the geographical source?

By gtall • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Nonsense, RFK, Jr. (note the R) has claimed Covid spared Ashkenazi Jews and Chinese people. That’s right up there with el Bunko claiming Haitian dogs and cats were eating Ohio children (or whatever that bozo was claiming), and claiming his uncle developed radar (no).

We used to have health care professionals in other countries helping diagnose and treat new diseases. Now, not. el Bunko canceled that, so now we have no prior warnings unless the pandemic spreads. el Bunko is supposed to enable our scientists to combat diseases, yet he’s cutting funding for medical research.

I do not know what fake meat is to you (or anyone else). If you are talking about lab grown meat, then compare conditions of lab grown meat with conditions in a slaughterhouse. And if you want to eat real meat again, do not visit a slaughterhouse because that will certainly put you off your vittles.

Now go back and update your background so that you are not siphoning right-wing nut conspiracies and coming here to spew them. If you are going to continue this, at least cc Fox News, they go for that kind of slop.

Antibiotics in farm use [Re:Do we know the …]

By XXongo • • Score: 4, Informative • Thread

Do we know if these are mainly developing in the USA or elsewhere in the world? The USA actually restricts antibiotics by requiring prescriptions.

Yes… and no.

The USA restricts antibiotics for humans by requiring prescriptions.

Farm animals get fed antibiotics by the truckload, and don’t need prescriptions.
https://www.ewg.org/news-insig…
https://extension.okstate.edu/…
https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/ant…
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/a…

Fix it? [Re:Do we know the geographical source?]

By XXongo • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Everything is Trump’s fault.

Accurate. DT has been reducing the budget and firing workers at the FDA and the CDC, which is to say, the medical professionals charged with stopping disease,.

Democrats will fix it in a few weeks

Unlikely. Even if Democrats win control of the House of Representatives, DT is still the president and hence the chief executive. The Democrats don’t have the power to fix anything, the best they might be able to do is to stop things from getting worse quite as quickly.

Possibly they could get rid of RFK Jr, who seems to be actively trying to destroy medical science in the US, but DT would just find another incompetent to replace him, and if the Senate won’t ratify, he has no problem just keeping an “acting” head forever.

We just need infinity immigrants. That solves everything.

Not sure how you can have “infinity” immigrants, but, yes, we could bring in doctors, nurses, and medical researchers from abroad.

Bacteriophages [Re:Antibiotics are going out.....]

By XXongo • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread

maybe bacteriophage (viruses that target bacteria) are the immerging technology. They are also useful in therapy for certain kinds of cancer.

Yeah, but it costs tens to hundreds of thousands of dollars and weeks of study to do that.

There’s a lot of work being done ( https://www.nature.com/article… ) including designing of genetically engineered bacteriophages ( https://news.stanford.edu/stor… ).

So, stay tuned.

Greenhouse Gas Levels Set Records In 2025, UN Says

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot
An anonymous reader quotes a report from CBS News:
Greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere rose to record highs in 2025, locking in climate impacts that will persist for centuries, the United Nations said on Tuesday. Levels of the three main greenhouse gases — the climate-warming carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide — all rose to unprecedented figures in 2025, the U.N.‘s weather and climate agency said. The World Meteorological Organization said the rise would lead to more long-term temperature increases for the planet.

The bulletin looks at greenhouse gas concentrations — the amount of those gases in the atmosphere — rather than new annual emissions amounts as the world burns more coal, oil and gas. In 2025, carbon dioxide concentrations were at 426.8 parts per million (ppm); methane at 1,948 parts per billion, and nitrous oxide at 339.1 parts per billion. That takes them, respectively, to 153%, 267% and 126% of the pre-industrial levels witnessed before 1750. Of the three major greenhouse gases, CO2 accounts for about 66% of the warming effect on the climate.

Around half of the total CO2 emitted each year remains in the atmosphere; the rest is absorbed by the land and oceans. From 2024 to 2025, the global average concentration of CO2 rose by 2.8 ppm — smaller than the record surge from 2023 to 2024 of 3.6 ppm. WMO senior scientific officer Oksana Tarasova said this reflected the “recovery of the land carbon sinks and reduced fire carbon emissions in 2025 after the strong 2023/2024 El Nino,” the naturally occurring, climate-warming weather phenomenon. “However, a 2.8 ppm annual increase is still a substantial addition of carbon to the atmosphere from fossil fuel burning.” It is also above the average growth rate for the past decade of 2.6 ppm — a figure that stood at 0.8 ppm in the 1960s.
“Another year, another new record,” said WMO Deputy Secretary-General Ko Barrett. “Greenhouse gases are trapping an unprecedented amount of heat in the atmosphere, providing energy for more extreme weather and associated risks to our economies and societies.
Further reading: UN Says Breaching 1.5C Warming Limit Is ‘Imminent and Unavoidable’

“Yes, we’ll all die horribly-

By locater16 • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
-but I will die much richer than you” - the problem

Headlines of next year

By hcs_$reboot • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
Greenhouse Gas Levels Set Records In 2026

Re:Well, AI

By outsider007 • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

That’s not from Archer, you Millennial.

Re:k, sure

By BadgerStork • • Score: 4, Informative • Thread

ice cores

Re:k, sure

By XXongo • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

Methane was only named in 1866. How did they make their cockenbull measurements of it 100 years before?

Paleoclimate researchers measure ancient methane primarily by analyzing air bubbles trapped in glacial ice cores retrieved by drilling into ice sheets in Antarctica and Greenland.