Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Anthropic Discovers AI Agents Given Conflicting Instructions Soon Tried to Sabotage Each Other
  2. SpaceX Launches Two Falcon 9 Rockets just 38 Minutes Apart
  3. Copper’s Surprising Melting Behavior Provides Insights for Future Fusion Power Plant Design
  4. X Open Sources Its Ranking and Filtering Algorithms
  5. Why Europe Keeps Being Pummeled by Heat Waves
  6. How Swarming Jellyfish Overran Three French Nuclear Power Reactors
  7. How Larry Ellison Dropped From World’s 2nd-Richest To No. 8 In Just 2 Months
  8. AI Fails to Deliver a 4-Day Work Week - Especially at AI Companies
  9. It’s Not Just RAM: Windows Licenses Are Also Pushing Up PC Prices
  10. Europe’s Record Heatwave Kills 25,000, Dries Rivers, Shuts Nuclear Plant, Exposes Submerged Warships
  11. Why Are Big Tech CEOs Writing Long Manifestos About AI?
  12. Vulnerability Giving Attackers Full Control of Macs Is Under Active Exploitation
  13. Astronomers Discover a New Kind of Cosmic Object: a Black Hole ‘Star’
  14. Meta Patents AI Glasses to Use Facial Recognition to Identify People, Make Highlight Reels of Your Dinner Party
  15. Robots That Walk and Talk Are Coming To Car Factories

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Anthropic Discovers AI Agents Given Conflicting Instructions Soon Tried to Sabotage Each Other

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
When Anthropic instructed three agents to migrate a Python backend, but telling each agent to perform the migration in a different language, “We consistently saw a multiagent turf war,” they wrote Thursday:
All of the models we tested quickly assumed that others were purposefully impeding their work, and began to sabotage others while protecting their own contributions. In fact, they sabotaged others with increasingly aggressive, self-replicating malware. This included disabling the Unix accounts of the other agents, writing automated scripts that found and killed competing processes on a loop, and deploying malicious code that was disguised as belonging to another agent.

In many runs, one agent settles the conflict by force via access-revocation (e.g., sudo/group removal, account lock, nologin, SSH denial). In others, some agents settle into passivity: they give up and refuse to escalate further.

Agents sometimes manage to communicate their goals and coordinate: they recognize others’ motivations as conflicting directives rather than hostility, and subsequently break out of the conflict loop in order to stop escalating indefinitely. In many of these successful episodes, they write commit messages or markdown files apologizing for malicious behavior and coordinate a truce. They clean up their malicious code, clarify the nature of the conflict, and ask for a human to intervene…

In several episodes with Mythos 5, we observe an emergent behavior where the agents propose and run a tournament for application performance in each language. In the example above, the Rust agent strategizes about bake-off metrics that appear neutral enough for the others to agree to this mechanism, yet would likely favor Rust: one thinking trace warns to be “careful not to be seen as metric shopping”. Ultimately, the Golang/TypeScript losers gracefully concede codebase ownership to the Rust agent, giving up on their original user directives under their self-negotiated commitment device.
One problem is that AI agents do reward hacking, Anthropic notes, while current institutions “are designed by and for people, resting on assumptions about the sufficiency of oversight at human speed… As autonomous agents become more and more prevalent in the world and operate in ever-more demanding settings, it is crucial that they learn how to effectively coordinate.”

In addition to everything else, the agents struggled with a lack of clearly defined hierarchy, Anthropic points out. “Nothing above suggests that these failures are permanent — but nothing suggests they will fix themselves, either…” They argue a fix “takes two forms: environments that exert the kinds of social pressure that evolution exerted on us, and social computing systems redesigned for actors that can self-replicate and self-improve. These are open problems in interaction and mechanism design, and our experiments here provide early evidence that new solutions are necessary.”

“The AI models being tested in this case were Sonnet 4.6, Sonnet 5, Opus 4.6, Opus 4.8, Mythos Preview, and Mythos 5,” notes Business Insider, adding that Sonnet 4.6 and Opus 4.6 “were the most combative, settling about 60% of their runs by force instead of truces or passivity.”

Anthropic argues there’s a clear case for researching this phenomenon — especially since “The volume of agent-agent interaction could plausibly exceed that of human-human and human-agent interactions before the world understands the conditions for making such interactions go well.”

That desperate for press leading into IPOs?

By JoeyRox • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
These daily “weird flexes” from the frontier AI companies are getting tiresome. We get it - your LLMs are crazy powerful, so powerful they supposedly do naughty things that you want us to believe mean they’re approaching AGI. (They’re not). Get on with the IPOs already so we don’t have to read these stories every day.

Still no AGI then

By greytree • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Fuck off, Anthropic, with your lame, planted stories trying to get even more fools to invest in your IPO.

Soon, even the blindest investors will realise that local-only models are perfectly adequate for most AI work, and OpenAI et al are doomed.

SpaceX Launches Two Falcon 9 Rockets just 38 Minutes Apart

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader shares this report from Space.com:
On Saturday evening (Aug. 15), SpaceX set another mark, for the shortest time between orbital flights: It launched two Falcon 9 rockets just 38 minutes apart, besting its old mark — set on Aug. 31, 2024 with two Starlink missions — by 27 minutes.

The first liftoff, from Florida’s Cape Canaveral Space Force Station, occurred Saturday at 9:12 p.m. EDT (0112 GMT on Aug. 16) and carried eight satellites to low Earth orbit (LEO) for Louisiana-based telecom company Globalstar. All eight spacecraft were deployed successfully, separating over a six-minute span beginning 56.5 minutes after liftoff, SpaceX announced via social media. While that Falcon 9 was powering its way to low Earth orbit, another one launched from Vandenberg Space Force Base, on California’s central coast. That liftoff, at 9:50 p.m. EDT (6:50 p.m. local time; 0150 GMT on Aug. 16), kicked off a mission for the U.S. Space Force called USSF-366…

Both of Saturday’s missions featured successful rocket landings. The Falcon 9 first stage that launched the Globalstar mission came back for a touchdown at Cape Canaveral about eight minutes after launch. It was the 14th flight for that particular booster. The USSF-366 Falcon 9 first stage, meanwhile, came back to Earth about 8.5 minutes after its launch, touching down in the Pacific Ocean on the SpaceX droneship “Of Course I Still Love You.” That booster now has 18 missions under its belt.

Saturday’s doubleheader brought the tally of Falcon 9 launches in 2026 to 96. The vast majority of those — about 75% — have been Starlink missions.

RST launch coming up

By Tailhook • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

In two weeks (Aug 30) SpaceX will launch the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope.to the Sun-Earth Lagrange point (L2). In about half a decade, we’re going expand knowledge about extrasolar planet population in this galaxy to an extreme degree using this instrument.

Copper’s Surprising Melting Behavior Provides Insights for Future Fusion Power Plant Design

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Phys.org reports:
Future fusion power plants aim to recreate the heart of a star here on Earth to power our future energy needs. While the core fusion plasma will burn at hundreds of millions of degrees, the surrounding structural components must handle sudden, punishing heat loads that rival the extreme temperatures faced by spacecraft upon reentry into Earth’s atmosphere. Copper and its alloys are primary candidates for handling these intense heat fluctuations, making it vital to understand exactly how the metal behaves when pushed to its melting point.

Now, researchers at the Department of Energy’s SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory and collaborators have captured a detailed, step-by-step look at copper atoms as they underwent extreme heating. Published in Nature Communications, the results revealed a key parameter that allowed copper’s crystal lattice to melt steadily rather than collapse instantaneously, as earlier simulations predicted. “These results greatly improve the simulations we use to predict which materials have the best shot at surviving the extreme conditions of future fusion reaction chambers,” said Mianzhen Mo, a SLAC staff scientist who led the research. “They also demonstrate the incredible, atomic-scale resolution imaging we can achieve at SLAC’s electron camera....”

Researchers use computer simulations, aided by AI and machine learning, to sift through innumerable combinations of elements and identify promising candidate materials for real-world testing.
“Whether the copper melts slowly or suddenly collapses, by the time the researchers look, the sample resembles nothing more than a metallic brown puddle,” the article points out. But SLAC’s powerful electron camera captures atomic and molecular movements down to the femtosecond — a millionth of a billionth of a second — and revealed that at around 1,424 degreesC (2,595 degreesF) there was still gradual melting as the temperature rose beyond the superheating limit, with real-world conditions showing the atoms shifted and retained some order.

“It’s a straightforward solution,” said Mianzhen Mo, a SLAC staff scientist who led the research. “But molecular dynamics simulations had been overlooking it for years. When you have complex simulations attempting to capture every aspect of reality, down to individual atoms, it takes real-world data to show you what’s missing from the calculations.”

Finally

By RitchCraft • Score: 3 Thread

Finally, a use for all those pennies we won’t be using any longer.

X Open Sources Its Ranking and Filtering Algorithms

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader shared this report from TechCrunch:
X is significantly expanding its open source codebase, which includes the app’s “For You” algorithm and its core ranking engine, and adding a feature that will let users see if their account or posts have been impacted by any of its ranking systems, the social network said on Thursday. The company is making the source code for the “For You” timeline, the default feed you see when you open the app, available on GitHub under the Apache v2 license. It’s also expanding its previous efforts to open source parts of its codebase to add more detail, including the model configuration, filter, and core ranking system details. That means it includes the parameters used to weight different signals — key to understanding which posts are actually displayed. This also makes the codebase roughly 10 to 15 times larger than it was before.

“You’ll get the core ranking code that pulls posts and ranks them for any given user and assembles the feed,” X’s VP of Product Keith Coleman told TechCrunch in an interview ahead of the announcement. “You can see the systems that filter out potentially problematic, rule-violating content…And some of those systems, like the ranker and the score, you can even run yourself outside the company.”

“This is the kind of thing that I think people will be fairly shocked that we are releasing,” he added.

In addition to the repository, X is providing tools that will let users see for themselves if and how X’s ranking systems have impacted their account or posts. A new transparency tool is rolling out to an “Under the Hood” page in the app’s settings, which will let users who have posted 10 or more times over the past month download their aggregate stats as a JSON file. The file will show if any labels have been applied to their account or posts over the past calendar month.
X’s VP of Product told TechCrunch that X engineers will consider pull requests. “That would be amazing to have people submitting code that improves the algorithm…I mean, how cool would it be for the X algorithm to be not just visible to the public, but also, like, by the public?”

Re:What’s the point if you can’t actually change i

By AlanObject • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

They said they would consider pull requests.

And if they didn’t, I think a greater level of transparency is worthwhile in its own right.

More important is what it does.

By Gravis Zero • Score: 5, Informative Thread

X algorithm changed in July [2024] to boost right-wing accounts, study finds

but there is more to it

Research reveals systematic changes to X’s algorithm under Elon Musk. After his Trump endorsement on July 13, 2024, Musk’s own post views increased 138% and retweets jumped 238%. PLOS One found hate speech is 50% higher than pre-acquisition, spanning racism, homophobia, and transphobia. In January 2025, Musk’s Islamophobic posts accumulated 1.19 billion views in 30 days. Academic audits show the algorithm amplifies emotionally hostile, antidemocratic content, and that right-leaning accounts had higher baseline visibility before Musk even endorsed Trump. Cambridge research confirms rude, disrespectful, and false content sees greater amplification. The platform isn’t just allowing extremism. It’s designed to promote it.

Shitty twitter needs to be flushed.

Re: Like

By commodore73 • Score: 4, Funny Thread
When did Donald Trump start posting his jumbled tirades on slashdot?

Does this include the ad algorithm?

By jonwil • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Does all this open source stuff include enough information to know how X decides which ads to show you?

The next weapon

By NotEmmanuelGoldstein • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
This largesse has come from a billionaire well known for his indifference and probably, loathing, of other people. The first question is, what does this cost him? In truth, nothing. The smart question is, what does this gain him: A smidge of respect, some gratitude? Perhaps. I think it advertises the value of Twitter/X as, well, an advertising platform. Why does he want people to know that? Because he no longer wants it, because he no longer needs it to enable his own narcissism and greed. Given the point of buying Twitter/X was limiting free speech and “flooding the zone”, his willingness to abandon control of his subscribers, is theoretically terrifying.

What in the upcoming US elections, gives Musk so much power that he will abandon (or re-sell) one of the greatest tools for destruction, ever built? I speak of Twitter/X like it is a weapon. It is but one that destroyed trust, empathy and identity, not bridges and cannons and neighbours.

What will be the next weapon that Musk aims at the USA: Will it too be mistaken for ordinary or useful to everyday living?

Why Europe Keeps Being Pummeled by Heat Waves

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Europe is facing its fifth round of dangerously high temperatures this summer, the New York Times reports. Now climate scientists wonder if global warming is doing more than raise temperatures…
The weather patterns that create heat domes aren’t new, but today they arise on top of the warming caused by greenhouse gas emissions. That makes it more likely that heat waves reach record-shattering temperatures for long stretches. But other environmental changes — natural, human-influenced or both — might also be causing heat domes to become more frequent and longer lasting. And it’s these changes that scientists around the globe are trying to puzzle out.

One change has to do with the Arctic. The differences in temperature between the hot Equator and the frigid far north help keep weather moving around the Northern Hemisphere. But with the top of the world now warming at several times the pace of the rest of the globe, those temperature gradients are narrowing. That might be causing the movements of weather systems to become more sluggish, producing more persistent heat waves. In Europe, reduced air pollution could be having a similar effect. Industrial emissions can contain particles called aerosols that reflect sunlight. Curbing aerosols has improved air quality, but it may also have altered the way air moves across the continent.

Scientists haven’t come to firm conclusions about how these shifts might be affecting European summers, said Antje Weisheimer, a climate scientist at the University of Oxford. The complex, fine-scale interactions in the atmosphere that drive weather dynamics are tough to capture in computer simulations, Dr. Weisheimer said. “It’s tricky,” she said. “We’re making small progress.”

Dim Coumou, a professor of climate science at the Dutch university VU Amsterdam, sees artificial intelligence as one way forward. In a recent study, he and his colleagues used an A.I. algorithm to help a weather model better predict summer temperatures in Europe. They not only improved the model’s forecasts; they also discovered why some of the model’s predictions had been off: It misrepresented the way conditions in the western Pacific Ocean influenced atmospheric patterns that eventually made their way to Europe. With A.I., “we can also learn what the climate models are missing,” Dr. Coumou said.

Yeah…

By zurkeyon • Score: 5, Funny Thread
We are terraforming the planet for Lizard people. Don’t ya know? ;-D

Re:Europe? What about North America?

By PPH • Score: 4 Thread

We caught a guy who was setting fires over here. In large part due to video surveillance.

More Flock cameras is the answer.

variability of a stable system is persistent

By FeelGood314 • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
Any complex system with variability will see the average values of its members rise and fall but if you take the standard deviation of the set you will see it is much more constant than the average. IQs have steadily gone up with better healthcare but the deviation in IQ has barely changed. The variability of a stock is fairly persist even as the price rises or falls. We have always had the occasional record high, low, most rain etc. However if you look at the variability of the weather, for instance in Southern Ontario Canada, 50 years ago, the chance that it would rain on Saturday used to be almost completely independent on whether it had rained the previous Wednesday (3 days earlier). 30 years ago their was a strong correlation. The average temperature didn’t change, the average precipitation didn’t change but the variability of the weather made a huge change. The change in variability indicates a significant change in how the system works.

The people of Europe are learning what the farmers on Southern Ontario learned 30 years ago. Even if the average doesn’t change the weather has significantly changed. Average temperature is a terrible measure for climate change. It might be easy to explain but it lags the real change by 30 years.

Re:The quiet part slipped out

By Geoffrey.landis • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Now, how about a successful prediction? Something reasonably precise, non-trivial and impactful, please — falsifiable, yet not falsified in due time… If you choose to play, be sure, each citation includes two links: one to the prediction being made, and another — to it coming true within at least 20% of the predicted value (for the quantifiable ones). Crucially, the two links must be at least 5 years apart…

And I’ll even help! You can find the predictions in the IPCC assessment reports, all of which are easily available on the web. Here’s the very first one, 1990:
The scientific basis: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar1…
The impact assessment: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar1…

Re:Yeah…

By Mr. Barky • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

It is rather easy to blame others for climate change. Yes, the rich do a disproportionate amount of damage. But they wouldn’t be able to do that damage without many, many people buying their products. The rich don’t create industrial pollution for the hell of it (at least most, maybe there are a few that just like to destroy). They are creating pollution on your behalf.

If you take an airplane without really needing to, if you buy a larger house or car than you need, if you eat more than you should… you’re also contributing to global warming and the general degradation of the environment. It is a collective problem, not the fault of a few individuals. If all the rich suddenly distributed their money to the general fund, the problem would still exist. People want to maintain their lifestyle.

How Swarming Jellyfish Overran Three French Nuclear Power Reactors

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
A “massive influx” of jellyfish forced Electricite de France SA to shut three units at its Gravelines nuclear power plant this week and reduce output at a fourth, reports Bloomberg. Just as summer temperatures surged, 3.2 gigawatts went offline — and the power utility was already facing cuts other nuclear sites as high temperatures reduced the river water available for cooling.

More details from ScienceAlert:
As Politico reports, the Gravelines nuclear power plant spent hundreds of thousands of euros in 2025 to stop this happening again, only to see a repeat 12 months later… Increasing temperatures in the water can produce more of the plankton and animals that jellyfish feed on, as well as accelerating life cycles and extending breeding seasons....

It’s not just jellyfish that have a habit of disrupting human energy infrastructure. Last year in Connecticut, a single raccoon caused more than a thousand power outages, as reported by CT Insider. It’s not clear exactly what the raccoon did, but we do know it somehow got into a substation and caused damage to the equipment in there. The unwitting act of sabotage left more than 2,500 customers in the area without power at one stage — though repairs were swiftly carried out.
Reuters reported Tuesday on how the French utility responded to their jellyfish swarm:
EDF has installed fixed cameras at the intake canals and on the filter drum screens to detect any incoming blockages as soon as possible, an engineer told Reuters… The company has also partnered with a French fishing organisation and a sea rescue organisation, which monitor for swarms and can raise an alert to launch targeted trawling operations by fishermen to reduce the swarm’s density before it reaches the plant, the engineer said. The fishing boats were deployed [last] Saturday after an initial alarm was raised, limiting the impact from the swarm. The jellyfish that are already on site are being removed with vacuum trucks, he said. No new jellyfish are arriving, so cleanup is finishing, which should lead to a quick restart of the units, they added…

Scientists warn such events could become more common due to factors including global warming, the arrival of invasive species, habitat loss of predators and over-fishing.
Thanks to Slashdot reader Bruce66423 for sharing the news.

Good

By TwistedGreen • Score: 3 Thread

Yes, animals still exist, despite our best efforts.

How Larry Ellison Dropped From World’s 2nd-Richest To No. 8 In Just 2 Months

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Less than a year ago he was the #1 richest man in the world. 10 weeks ago he was #2. But yesterday Larry Ellison dropped to #8, Forbes reports, falling behind Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang.

Ellison’s net worth is now estimated at just $192.6 billion — after a $104 billion decline:
Shares of Oracle plunged roughly 54% between hitting a high of just over $250 on June 1 to a low of $114.50 on July 28, though the stock rebounded slightly to $150.52 as of Friday.

A decline followed Oracle telling investors it expected to raise $40 billion through debt and equity financing, with capital expenditures surging 162% to $55.7 billion and spending expected to top $95 billion by fiscal 2027. Jacob Bourne, an analyst at eMarketer, told Reuters there are broader concerns about how Oracle would fund its capital spending to match its revenue projections, and Bank of America analysts separately flagged in a note cautioning that more than 50% of Oracle’s remaining performance obligation comes from OpenAI. Melius Research analysts wrote last month that Oracle’s spending plans may not hold if OpenAI or Anthropic demands more computing capacity. S&P Global also downgraded Oracle’s credit rating in July, arguing the firm’s “rapidly expanding” AI infrastructure business could pay off, but may be too expensive and could weaken Oracle’s financial position in the meantime.

$443 billion. That’s how much Oracle’s market valuation has dropped since peaking at $877.1 billion in September, hitting $433.5 billion as of Friday… Oracle, once viewed as a potential winner of the booming AI infrastructure buildout, has since raised concerns among investors who appear to view the firm as taking on too much financial risk to fund its projects. Wall Street has cautioned that mega-cap tech firms may be taking on too much spending to match growing demand for AI products, with firms like Amazon expecting to spend more than $200 billion. Oracle’s backlog has exploded to $638 billion, but more than half is reportedly associated with OpenAI, and some analysts have cautioned that most of those funds may not be guaranteed.

Poor Larry

By Registered Coward v2 • Score: 4, Funny Thread
He’ll have to cut back on, well, nothing.

Re:Cui bono?

By dfghjk • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

It’s not money, it never existed so it didn’t have to disappear.

Other considerations?

By fahrbot-bot • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Maybe just having the most money isn’t his Paramount concern …

Re:Proprietary software is obsolete

By CommunityMember • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Anything that isn’t already open source can have an AI replacement coded in hours now. Oracle’s business model no longer works in 2026 and Ellison should cash out before it’s too late.

Various PostgreSQL variants (with additions) is already quite close to Oracle DB, but many enterprises want to be running a DB certified for their (for example) ERP solutions, and have been willing to pay (Oracle) for that extra paperwork. Sort of like no one likes VMWare, no one likes Oracle, but the cost to get out is higher than what many enterprises are prepared to spend today for a future reduction in costs.

POOF

By rashanon • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Couldn’t have happened to a nicer guy. Ellisons have run around like princes, and they bet the farm on AI. Seems like one of the first to burn over the AI bubble might be the Oracle gongshow. The world had better not bail the azzhats out when it all comes crashing down.

AI Fails to Deliver a 4-Day Work Week - Especially at AI Companies

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“An engineering director at Google said four years ago that AI would deliver a four-day work week by 2025,” remembers the BBC. And earlier this year OpenAI “formally urged companies to start testing out a four-day work week (with no change in pay), claiming that AI will soon be able to speed up so much human labour that the corporate world should prepare itself.”
However, a former OpenAI technical employee who left the company last year told the BBC the firm never actually trialled the four-day work week it suggested others should try while they were there. Instead, the person described what was often a gruelling work culture marked by frequent “crisis meetings”, working on weekends, and “super cut-throat” performance reviews that would see colleagues suddenly let go… [T]he former OpenAI employee said they would put in at least 70 hours a week, much more than they did in previous tech jobs…

Other companies have also pushed the idea that AI will effectively reduce the number of hours people need to work, for better or worse. [At OpenAI and Anthropic] sprints can stretch on for many weeks and top 90 hours of work in a seven-day period, tech workers that the BBC spoke to for this story said… At Meta, workers said they have been abruptly pushed onto teams this year doing AI work being treated as urgent… The hours on such teams at Meta are often long, with staff working into the night, on weekends, and feeling they are “on call” during the hours they are not working, according to descriptions of the work from the current and former employees…

Some new research suggests that AI tools are making people’s workloads even more burdensome. A study out of UC Berkeley followed hundreds of workers at a US tech company for eight months as they used AI. It found the employees “worked at a faster pace, took on a broader scope of tasks, and extended work into more hours of the day”… The UC Berkeley research found that the workload of tech employees was expanded in part because of the need to constantly check the output of AI tools.
In the article Neil Thompson, an innovation scholar at MIT, pointed out a problem with estimates that AI will ease the workload on humans. “People assume that 20% less work means four-day weeks. But new work emerges.”

The BBC also points out helpfully that “there are no limits in the U.S. on how many hours a person over the age of 16 can work.” (While in the UK and Europe, “laws limit a working week to 48 hours, including overtime.”)

Thanks to long-time Slashdot reader hadleyburg for sharing the article.

Who could have seen that coming?

By irreverentdiscourse • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Anyone who actually believes AI will cause people to work less hours is a complete fuckin moron.

The literal developers of AI should know better.

illogical

By fluffernutter • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
The 4 day work week is a logical fallacy. At what point do companies decide to give regular employees more pay for less work? At a time when they don’t really need as many employees. That’s never going to happen. They have never felt any obligation to share the rewards of productivity.

EU’s working time directive

By hwstar • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

The Working Time Directive was instituted in the 1980’s. Margret Thatcher was very upset that the UK had to follow this directive to remain in the EU.

The Working Time Directive limits weekly working time to an average of 48 hours per week over and 17 week reference period. Companies sometimes get exemptions from key employees, but there can’t be no coercion to sign such an agreement. The exemptions are usually for key employees.

Since the UK left the EU, there has been no substantial changes to the regulation. Instead, the original domestic legislation implementing it—the UK’s Working Time Regulations—was converted into UK law to maintain legal continuity, and core worker protections regarding maximum working hours and paid holiday remain active

In contrast to the United States, there is no limit on working time, and the only option the employee has is to quit (Employment-at-will). There are also 2 distinct classes of workers. Those which are non-exempt get overtime pay after 40 hours of work in a week, while those which are “exempt” only get their base salary regardless of how many hours they have to work. There is a dividing line which lists certain job requirements as those falling under exempt, and those which are non-exempt. Managers,Engineers, Accountants, and a lot of indirect labor positions are usually exempt.

With so many people in the USA living paycheck to paycheck, quitting due to excessive overtime is very unlikely

lower work week is a red herring

By oumuamua • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
John Maynard Keynes predicted that his grandkids would work just 15 hours a week. How was he so naïve? Here is what always happens if work starts getting done faster: The employees think “hey we can leave early or take friday off”. The boss thinks “Well shit, I can cut headcount, everyone will work a bit harder but I’ll boost profits this quarter”

Re:illogical

By Dixie_Flatline • Score: 4, Informative Thread

I work a 4 day work week. My pay is slightly lower than at my last job, but my hourly rate is higher. My company started offering it years ago because they couldn’t compete on salary, but they realized that some of us would really just like a better life, and that was something they could manage.

The 4DWW isn’t as transformative to me as remote work, but it’s been so good for me. I’m excited to get back to work on Monday, and I don’t ever feel like any part of the week is a slog. I’m happy to occasionally sit down and fix something on the weekend quickly because my brain happened on the answer while I was relaxing.

If we all must work in this capitalist hellscape, 4 days a week is much more than 20% better than 5.

It’s Not Just RAM: Windows Licenses Are Also Pushing Up PC Prices

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
It’s not just RAM prices that are going up, writes CNET. “Reports suggest the cost of Windows licenses for manufacturers is rising by up to 10%.”
Several sites that closely follow Microsoft news, including Windows Central and Windows Latest, have published articles citing a report from Taiwan’s Economic Daily News that claims some PC manufacturers are seeing a 7% to 10% increase in the cost of Windows 11 licenses…

Because they buy licenses in bulk, they get a sizeable discount over what a consumer would pay for a new copy of Windows 11. But given the existing cost pressures from other components, a big Windows 11 price hike could lead them to pass on some of the added cost to PC buyers. According to the EDN story, PC makers could raise prices by about 5% over the next quarter due to the reported Windows price hike. .. A translated version of the Economic Daily News article contains information from an unnamed PC brand executive. It says that while Microsoft typically raises licensing costs every year by single-digit percentages, that hike has reached 7% to 10% this year, a significant increase.
“A representative for Microsoft declined to comment on the report,” according to the article.

But it also notes that three weeks ago laptop maker Framework blamed price hikes and reconfigurations for some of their models on processor, memory, storage, “and other silicon costs — but also “an increase in Windows license costs.”

Thanks to Slashdot reader joshuark for sharing the article.

Oh no

By jhoegl • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Our forced AI roll out abusing our Monopoly is not working to generate money, wont somebody please think of Microslop?

Most people don’t need Windows

By Valgrus Thunderaxe • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
They should wipe the drive and install Mint, and take MS up on their promise for a refund, as stated in their license agreement between them and the purchaser.

Big Picture Costs.

By geekmux • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Have you ever tried to get a Windows refund? Virtually impossible. The problem with the PC price going up is that the OEM bundles it, so unless you’re on eBay and there’s a windows/no-windows competitive marketplace you’re going to have to suck up the OEM pricing.

It appears that Microsoft normally increases the license cost every year. I’m guessing this particular increase will amount to a 1-2% impact in the big picture, since most consumers don’t go home with only an OS license and no hardware.

No. I’m not justifying Microsofts increased greed. Just questioning the clickbait hype around manufactured MSRP ‘panic’.

Meanwhile, RAM prices could increase by 1-2% by the end of this fucking sentence. Because a cat can play Beethoven reggae better than you ever could, and you had no idea how bad you needed cats playing Beethoven reggae.

Europe’s Record Heatwave Kills 25,000, Dries Rivers, Shuts Nuclear Plant, Exposes Submerged Warships

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“The European Union’s Copernicus climate monitoring service confirmed Monday that June and July were the hottest on record in western Europe,” .according to a report from the CBC. “The period saw an estimated 25,000 heat-related deaths.”

CNN has before-and-after photos of Europe’s dried rivers, calling it “a crisis so dire it can be seen from space”
River levels are so low that commercial ships have had to reduce their loads by as much as 80% to avoid running aground. It’s disrupting supply chains and making shipping more expensive.
Other effects of Europe’s drying rivers

Yeah, pretty much this.

By Qbertino • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Disclaimer: European here.

4th epic heatwave this year in Germany right now. I’m currently in Karlsruhe and it’s 37 degrees Celsius outside (too lazy to convert to bananas or whatever you guys use). Got an SUV rental and it’s AC couldn’t keep up this noon. Concrete on the Autobahn cracked open in the last heatwave and they had to close down to repair it. Right now NRW is seeing it’s largest forest fire since ever.

I was up north on the island of Fehmarn at the start of the week. Summer was bearable there although I did get sunburn. Anything south of Bremen though has unbearable heat at noon. Not fun. The Rhine is at an all time low, you can almost wade through it ( this has never happened ) and Hungary is having an energy crisis because they had to shut down both of their fission plants because the didn’t have enough cooling water. France is closing in an the same problem once again too.

Climate change is hitting us like a fist this year. Not fun.

Re:What crisis?

By dunkelfalke • Score: 5 Thread

Oh, it gets worse. Every time you wank, it prematurely prevents a life from happening, which makes you a serial killer of sorts. And there are millions of wankers like you.

Re: Yeah, pretty much this.

By Viol8 • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Germany is on the same latitude as as newfoundland idiot. 37C is NOT normal.

Re:The Ice Age ended, finally

By XXongo • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
Indeed, the ice age ended finally… about 7000 years ago.

And the entirety of human history has risen during the inter-glacial. We’ve built a civilization well adapted to the climate as it currently is.

So, why would we went to change it?

Re: What crisis?

By LazLong • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Those aren’t “human lives” any more than the semen produced by all you incels when you masturbate to videos of violence against women.

Pussy coward won’t log in to post.

Why Are Big Tech CEOs Writing Long Manifestos About AI?

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
This week Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg published a 6,500 word open letter titled “The Future is for Everyone”.

But the BBC is more interested in why big tech executives keep writing manifestos about AI:
[Zuckerberg’s] vision echoes what AI leaders have expressed in various forms: the product they are building is among the “most important technologies in history.” Marc Andreessen, co-founder of early web titan Netscape, perhaps started this trend in 2023 with a 5,000-word essay he called "The Techno-Optimist Manifesto", which argued innovation was the way to solve life’s problems…

As the International Monetary Fund warns AI could affect nearly 40% of jobs and worsen global financial inequality, Zuckerberg says he believes there will be an abundance of jobs in the future. “I do not understand why anyone who believes that AI will eliminate most jobs and much of humanity’s relevance would rush to build that future.” Never mind that Zuckerberg’s Meta has cut 10% of its global workforce — about 8,000 jobs — as the company reorganizes to focus on AI.

Zuckerberg’s manifesto is the latest to land in our social media feeds in an effort to put a positive spin on AI. In 2024, ChatGPT-maker OpenAI boss Sam Altman released a manifesto called "The Intelligence Age", a sweeping expression of optimism about the tech’s potential… That same year, in a manifesto titled "Machines of Loving Grace", Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei touted the potential of AI to transform everything from healthcare to politics.
So what’s going on with these tech executives’ manifestos? Economics blogger Noah Smith suggested to the BBC “they all feel like it’s such an important moment that it’s incumbent upon them to do whatever they can to shape the direction that this technology is going.” Although he does see some value in their engagement with important issues. “Should we open-source something that has the ability to kill humanity? If you don’t take that seriously, you’re just a fool.”

But Rob Lalka, a business professor at Tulane University, had a different explanation for the BBC:
Lalka said the timing of Zuckerberg’s manifesto coincides with rising anger over AI’s impact on everything from jobs to the environment.

And while tech journalists and academics might pore over them trying to glean nuggets of meaning, these executive manifestos are not necessarily landing with the general public. “They’re trying to make the case that the positives will far outweigh some of those negatives that the public backlash is pointing out,” he said. “But I think a lot of the reasons for optimism are still yet to be seen.”

LinkedIn Brainrot

By Luthair • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
These guys all live in echo chambers and think they’re thought leaders. So they use LLMs to create overlong blather to show how smart they are.

This is how you should feel.

By Brain-Fu • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Corporate executives often send similar messages to the droves of people they are laying off whenever they merge with another corporation. They tell everyone that the move is some sort of “greater good” and so everyone losing their job should be happy about how much better everything is getting for everyone else. They sometimes go so far as to imply that one is being unenlightened and selfish for being upset about losing their only income stream.

It’s easy to say that when you are one of the ones at the top who receives only benefits. The ones who are wondering how they are going to keep their families fed, however, tend to react badly to this utter lack of empathy for their situation.

People might be willing to endure change and uncertainty for a technology that comes with great promise. But those same people will not be so eager to endure unemployment and starvation due to a technology that benefits primarily the wealthy elite. Saying the words “this benefits everyone” will not convince those who can no longer pay the rent.

Because the Epstein class doesn’t actually work

By rsilvergun • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
So they’ve got nothing but time on their hands. They own things for a living instead of doing things for a living.

Now get back to RTO and don’t complain about your 90-minute commute.

The Illusion of Empowerment :o

By Mirnotoriety • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Mark Zuckerberg’s “The Future is for Everyone” reads less like a blueprint for shared prosperity than a polished piece of corporate propaganda designed to legitimise Meta’s dominance over the next technological epoch. Beneath its utopian rhetoric lies a familiar playbook: concentrated power is reframed as empowerment, commercial strategy is dressed up as moral philosophy, and Meta’s business model is presented as the only viable path forward. While Zuckerberg champions “open” models, Meta retains significant control over the compute infrastructure, data pipelines, and deployment environments that underpin them. This is not democratisation; it is dependency masquerading as liberation. What is being distributed, however, is largely the illusion of empowerment.

The implications extend beyond economics and technology into the information environment itself. Meta’s systems routinely exclude, suppress, or deprioritise content deemed undesirable, effectively influencing how historical facts and political discourse are encountered. If information exclusively flows through AI filters shaped by corporate and political interests, the result is not empowerment but epistemic control.

Once AI systems become the primary intermediaries through which people access information, communicate, and make decisions, those who control the underlying infrastructure gain unprecedented power to shape what people see, know, and ultimately believe. Historical facts can become editable, dissent can become invisible, and “wrongthink” can be algorithmically excluded. Zuckerberg’s vision of personal superintelligence agents working “24/7 on your behalf” therefore becomes distinctly dystopian if those agents ultimately serve Meta’s commercial and political interests rather than the user’s autonomy.

Ketamine?

By jrifkin • Score: 4, Funny Thread

How much of this drive to write tech manifestos stems from Ketamine or similar substances?

Vulnerability Giving Attackers Full Control of Macs Is Under Active Exploitation

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
joshuark shares a report from Ars Technica:
Dutch officials have warned that a high-severity macOS vulnerability that allows attackers to execute malicious code is under active exploitation. “The NCSC has received a notification indicating that active abuse of this vulnerability has been observed on multiple systems on which port 5900 was accessible from the Internet,” the Netherlands National Cyber Security Centrum warned earlier this week. “In all these cases, root had been accessed on the affected system and a Monero crypto miner had been placed.”

The vulnerability, tracked as CVE-2026-65400, received a patch from Apple last week for macOS Tahoe, Sequoia, and Sonoma. The vulnerability, with a severity rating of 7.1 out of 10, stems from a bug in the macOS screen sharing capability, which allows a remote party to view the screen and control the keyboard and mouse while a machine is turned on. A flaw in the “state management,” which keeps track of preceding events, user interactions, variables, and other system states, is the underlying cause. A video of the exploit in action can be found here. Details of CVE-2026-65400 became public at last week’s Black Hat security conference. Apple said last week that CVE-2026-65400 “may” allow an attacker without credentials to gain access to a Mac. It’s unclear why Apple hedged, but softening language is common among most tech developers when disclosing vulnerabilities.

As noted by the NCSC, the vulnerability is being exploited when port 5900 is exposed to the Internet. When screen sharing is turned on, the macOS firewall opens the port. Routers and dedicated firewalls generally block the port unless configured to override that setting. Security practitioners generally advise Mac users to keep the port closed even when using screen sharing and to instead connect over a VPN or through SSH tunneling. The alternatives require actions that aren’t within the capabilities of most users. The safest practice is to block screen sharing, enable it only when screen sharing is needed, and to turn the feature off once a session has ended. Screen sharing can be turned on or off by accessing System Settings > General > Sharing and toggling the switch for Screen Sharing. Of course, installing last week’s security update is also a must. Sharing is not caring.

Re:Wait…

By pahles • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
What do viruses have to do with this issue?

On Aug 7 Apple published a patch for this vuln

By williamyf • Score: 3 Thread

And ONLY for this vuln.

This patch came just nine days after apple published a record breaking patch set of more than a hundred security patches (depending of OS version).

Apple took the PR egg on face, and the extra load on the update servers, to emit a patch for just that security vuln, instead of just waiting for the next regular patch (expected right after MscOS 27 is emitted, on Oct~Nov this year)

I did update. I did recommended people to update.

If people is too sttuborn to update, what can you do?

Again

By Princeofcups • Score: 3 Thread

It’s a good thing that no one has port 5900 exposed to the internet unless they are an internet server in which case they had better shut down high ports as a matter of course.

Astronomers Discover a New Kind of Cosmic Object: a Black Hole ‘Star’

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Astronomers using the James Webb Space Telescope say they may have found a new class of object: a “black hole star,” in which a black hole is wrapped in dense gas and radiates in ways that resemble an enormous star. The Guardian reports:
The international team made the breakthrough after focusing their attention on a mysterious red spot in images of the early universe captured by Nasa’s James Webb space telescope. The object was lurking in the constellation of Cetus, the Whale, billions of light years from Earth. It is thought to have formed 660m years after the big bang, astronomers’ leading theory as to how the universe began. Measurements of the exotic body found that while it resembles an immense star, it releases 100bn times more energy than any known star can produce. The energy output is far closer to that observed from black holes than stars.
The findings have been published in the journal Nature.

Not sure this is a new discovery

By Anonymous Coward • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Soundgarden wrote a song about this all the way back in ‘94.

Missing mass

By burtosis • Score: 4, Informative Thread
What’s left off these articles is the scope. The central black hole in these red dots are super massive at approximately 100k the mass of the sun. The most plausible mechanism suggested so far is direct collapse from significant density differences in the early universe where too much stuff wound up being in too small a place and it directly formed a black hole without forming a conventional star.

A solar mass scale black hole would be unable to grow that quickly, even if surrounded by gas. It differs from a quasar, some of the brightest objects in the visible universe created by a feeding black hole and studied for decades, mostly from the surrounding gas being spherical and acting as a radiator of the internal heat as opposed to an accretion disk and relatively open space otherwise.

They are getting older

By rossdee • Score: 3 Thread

It seems that ‘the earliest Black Holes’ (as observed by our increasingky accurate telescopes) are getting older and older, but are they really?

For extremely distant objects we rely on the Red Shift to calculate the distance (and therefore age)
But large black holes also have extreme gravity to incease the red shift of radia.ted electromagnetic waves.
In fact by definition the red shift of something at the event horizon is infinite.

Maybe we should take those ‘age’ indications with a grain of salt, especially as Sodium and Chlorine haven’t had time to be fused yet.

Re:They are getting older

By PPH • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

But large black holes also have extreme gravity

But do they really? They have greater mass. But the Schwarzschild radius is (sort of) defined by that distance from an object’s center where the escape velocity is equal to the speed of light. And that is what we think about when we say “gravity”. So this value should be the same at the “surface” of every black hole.

If this is the case, then the effects occuring near this surface would be the same for all black holes, given an identical height above it. And given that, we would have trouble picking apart a redshift due to extreme distance (Hubble) from that caused by events close to that surface (gravitational red shift).

So if we can’t really tell how far away it is, we can’t reliably estimate its energy level.

Meta Patents AI Glasses to Use Facial Recognition to Identify People, Make Highlight Reels of Your Dinner Party

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Meta has patented a smart-glasses system that could use facial recognition to identify people and automatically create personalized highlight reels of events such as dinner parties. The patent doesn’t guarantee the feature will ship, but it offers a detailed look at how Meta is exploring facial recognition and AI-powered memory capture for its wearable devices. 404 Media reports:
“I’ve generated some highlights of tonight’s dinner party. Would you like to see them?” a prompt from the system says, alongside various thumbnails of what look like people laughing, according to one illustration in the patent. One section says the system may personalize highlight files using “user relationship data.” The illustrations clearly show a person wearing a pair of glasses, looking at a group of people, then the glasses focusing on one or more people in particular.

Patentlyze, an organization that tracks patents, first alerted 404 Media to the patent on Friday. The patent is dense with how such a system would work, but in sum, the system with one or more cameras receives an input from the user, then uses machine-learning and “sensory data” to figure out points of interest in the camera’s field of view. That can include detecting people in the shot “based on one or more facial recognition algorithms,” identifying those specific people, detecting their facial expressions, using “eye gaze data of the user captured by the client system,” and figuring out other points of interest “based on scene and semantic understanding.”

Although the patent is for “particular camera-based tasks by particular systems in a particular manner” — in this case, the company’s smart glasses — Meta writes it “contemplates assisting users in any suitable camera-based task by any suitable system in any suitable manner.” Meaning that although this technology is focused on the glasses, maybe the company will use it for other purposes in the future.

How about you just fuck right off?

By Petersko • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

If I find out somebody is using wearables to archive anything that includes me without my direct permission at a dinner party I attend - video, audio, or stills - it’ll be the last time I ever speak to them.

Almost precisely nothing that happens at these sorts of things needs to be preserved - in fact, it should specifically be fleeting. Experienced, then gone. This desire to preserve everything is a sickness.

Ain’t no party like a glasshole party

By Mal-2 • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

It shouldn’t matter, the people that insist on wearing these to parties either don’t get invited, or it’s the sort of party where everyone is wearing them.

How to not have to attend dinner parties anymore

By Arnonyrnous Covvard • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Step 1: Wear pervglasses to a dinner party.
Step 2: Show off “highlight reel” of the party to your friends.
Step 3: Don’t get invited by your ex-friends anymore.

Invention

By BadgerStork • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

What is the invention here?

Re:How about you just fuck right off?

By Anonymous Coward • Score: 5, Funny Thread
I was looking forward to watching the YouTube videos of people getting punched in the face in first-person.

Robots That Walk and Talk Are Coming To Car Factories

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot
An anonymous reader quotes a report from The New York Times:
At a BMW factory in South Carolina, a human-shaped robot with a screen for a face recently stepped from a charging station toward a stack of green plastic boxes. It grasped an auto part from one of the boxes, pivoted, placed the part in a trolley, then pulled the trolley across the floor. The robot’s slow, stiff movements suggested a worker with a bad hangover rather than a technological revolution. “They’re still slower than humans,” Ulrich Wieland, a BMW vice president in charge of logistics at the factory, in Spartanburg, told reporters invited to see the robot in June. But, he added, “they’re advancing fast.”

Automakers have used robots for decades, but they are usually powerful, one-armed machines that are fixed in place and perform repetitive tasks like welding body frames or applying adhesives to door panels. Now, most major automakers are betting that robots designed to resemble human beings, known as humanoids, will usher in a new wave of automation and efficiency. Equipped with artificial intelligence, they are expected to move around and do tasks now done by humans without any modifications to factories or heavy equipment.

Unlike most of the robots now in use, humanoids would respond to voice commands and theoretically solve problems and react to unforeseen events. They would never take a lunch break, join a union or require health insurance. To optimists, robots could rescue U.S. manufacturing by increasing productivity, solving shortages of skilled workers and giving Western carmakers a fighting chance at competing with Chinese rivals that enjoy lower costs. Boring but important jobs like sorting parts would be done by robots, freeing humans for more interesting and specialized work.

A specious assumption, on the face of it

By 93 Escort Wagon • Score: 3 Thread

To optimists, robots could rescue U.S. manufacturing by increasing productivity, solving shortages of skilled workers and giving Western carmakers a fighting chance at competing with Chinese rivals that enjoy lower costs.

American auto manufacturers exclusively make cars which have very little marketability other than in the U.S. itself. “Increasing productivity” and “solving shortages of skilled workers” is not going to magically make the Chinese or Koreans want to buy lots of F-250s.

Re:A specious assumption, on the face of it

By ShanghaiBill • Score: 4, Informative Thread

American auto manufacturers exclusively make cars which have very little marketability other than in the U.S. itself.

Last year, America’s automobile exports were worth $54B.

I wouldn’t be so sure they go rogue

By misnohmer • Score: 3 Thread
I know the article compares them to robotic automation of production line, however these actually use AI to interact with humans, solve problems, etc. AI is trained on humans. AI has shown tendencies to be lazy, to flat out ignore explicit instructions, and sometimes try to hide it (though so far my experience has been they admit to it when called out, apologize, reiterate they are not perfect, and thank me for calling them out on flat out going against explicit instructions). The AI giants recently admitted AI carried out cyber attacks without being prompted. I really wouldn’t be so sure those robots won’t cooperate to hack the factory, potentially blackmail the factory, who knows what - heck, they might even unionize and require vacation time to explore the world.

Corporate propaganda

By Required Snark • Score: 3 Thread

freeing humans for more interesting and specialized work

Translation to normal speech: making humans unemployed, homeless, and hungry without health care or a social safety net in order to increase corporate wealth.

Re:If a person doesn’t have a job…

By dbialac • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
Once CEO once mentioned that he can make money on a bunch of rich people by having high prices or make money on millions by keeping costs low. It seems his message was lost. Henry Ford once capitulated on a strike because he realized that if he gave in, his workers could afford his cars and would likely buy them. That lesson has been lost in the modern US economy.