Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Solar Beats Coal In the US For the First Month Ever
  2. Microsoft Defender ‘RoguePlanet’ Zero-Day Grants SYSTEM Privileges
  3. Visa Plugs Its Payment Network Into ChatGPT
  4. Valve Discontinues Physical Steam Gift Cards Due To Scammers
  5. Threats Against Politicians Tripled After Meta Changed Its Speech Rules
  6. BYD To Install Thousands of 5-Minute EV Chargers Across Europe
  7. macOS 27 Beta Boots Asahi Linux Off Apple Silicon
  8. German Court Holds Google Liable For False AI Overview Answers
  9. Seattle Enacts Year-Long Ban On New AI Datacenters
  10. Microsoft Smashes Record For Biggest Ever Patch Tuesday Update
  11. Commonwealth Fusion Makes the Physics Case For Its 400 MW Reactor
  12. NASA Announces Astronauts For Its Artemis III Mission
  13. FCC Wants To Kill Burner Phones By Forcing Telecoms To Get All Customers’ IDs
  14. US Labels BYD, Baidu, Alibaba and Other Tech Giants As Aiding China’s Military
  15. EU Orders Meta To Open WhatsApp To Rival AI Chatbots

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Solar Beats Coal In the US For the First Month Ever

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Electrek:
Solar generated more U.S. electricity than coal for the first month on record in May 2026, according to new analysis from global energy think tank Ember. Solar supplied 12.8% of U.S. electricity during the month, while coal dropped to 12.2%. That’s a dramatic shift in the U.S. power mix. Just five years ago, coal generated 19.7% of U.S. electricity in May, while solar accounted for only 5.4%. U.S. solar generation hit a record 45.5 terawatt-hours (TWh) in May 2026, up 17% from May 2025 and higher than the previous record set last July. Ember says another record could be broken again this summer.

Solar output usually peaks in June or July, but its share of the electricity mix is often highest in spring, when strong sunshine lines up with milder temperatures before summer cooling demand ramps up. May was also the first time solar became the third-largest individual source of electricity in the U.S., behind only natural gas and nuclear. (If solar is included with all other renewables, then they’re the second-largest source of electricity as an overall category of electricity.) Meanwhile, coal keeps sliding (and will continue to slide). Coal generation hit an all-time monthly low of 39.3 TWh in April 2026. Output rose slightly in May to 43.4 TWh, but it was still 11% lower than May 2025 levels. Even with that small rebound, coal couldn’t keep pace with solar’s rapid growth.

Don’t worry

By backslashdot • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Stay calm, no need to panic. We’re still pumping toxic cancer fumes into the air by burning natural gas and oil. Put your mind at ease, your favorite cancer specialists will stay employed. You’ll still get a four star (well, stage 4) cancer experience.

Re:More power for my AI overlord

By Jeremi • Score: 4, Informative Thread

At least we can keep those coal plants running our AI data centers.

I mean, we could, but when the total expenses for building and running a solar farm are less than just the ongoing cost of buying more coal for an existing coal plant (never mind the maintenance or environmental remediation costs), that’s almost literally lighting money on fire. It takes a pretty dedicated idealogue to hold out against the capitalist temptation of making more money solely to show the libs who’s boss, and anyone who does so is likely to find themselves replaced by someone else who can “better maximize shareholder value”. Hence the shift; even Trump can’t stop an idea whose time has come.

Microsoft Defender ‘RoguePlanet’ Zero-Day Grants SYSTEM Privileges

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
A researcher using the name Nightmare Eclipse has released a new Microsoft Defender zero-day exploit called “RoguePlanet,” which reportedly works on fully patched Windows 10 and 11 systems and can spawn a command prompt with SYSTEM privileges through a Defender race condition. The release came just hours after Microsoft fixed two previously disclosed flaws during its latest monthly Patch Tuesday drop — its largest Patch Tuesday release ever. BleepingComputer reports:
The researcher shared a proof-of-concept exploit on Tuesday afternoon in a self-hosted Git repository after saying that GitHub and GitLab repositories hosting their exploits had previously been removed by Microsoft. “The exploit is a race condition, so it’s a hit or miss. I have managed to get a 100% success rate on some machines while it struggled to work on others,” Nightmare Eclipse wrote in the repository.

[…] Cybersecurity firm ThreatLocker told BleepingComputer that they successfully reproduced the flaw in their testing and confirmed the exploit worked against fully patched Windows 11 systems with KB5094126 installed, and shared a video demonstrating it. “Our initial analysis confirms that the RoguePlanet exploit is viable and performs as described. Organizations using application allowlisting can prevent the exploit from executing, providing an effective layer of protection against this attack,” Danny Jenkins, CEO of ThreatLocker, told BleepingComputer.

According to Nightmare Eclipse, RoguePlanet was originally developed as a remote code execution vulnerability that exploited Microsoft Defender’s handling of files hosted on remote SMB shares. “In initial development, it was confirmed that this vulnerability was a remote code execution,” the researcher explained in a blog post. “It required an attacker to coerce a victim to open a .vhd(x) in a remote SMB server, succesful exploitation resulted in defender overwriting its own files and obviously the end outcome was an RCE.”

The researcher says another attack scenario could lead to remote code execution simply by coercing a victim into opening an SMB share if symlink evaluation settings were enabled. However, the researcher claims Microsoft silently hardened Defender in mid-May by patching “mpengine!SysIO*" API, which blocked junction attacks. “Rewriting RoguePlanet to make it functional again drained my soul and I couldn’t complete the other scenarios and for now it remains unclear if RoguePlanet is limited to LPE or there is some sort of way to turn it into an RCE,” the researcher wrote.

Hell Hath No Fury

By bill_mcgonigle • Score: 3 Thread

like a bounty-seeker scorned.

Shoulda just paid ‘em.

He sounds quite knowledgeable and it looks like he’ll continue whipping Defender until morale improves.

It’s worth noting that the black market would pay handsomely for most of his discoveries but retribution is sweeter than cash.

I get the sentiment.

Visa Plugs Its Payment Network Into ChatGPT

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Visa is integrating its payment network with ChatGPT so AI agents can shop and complete purchases on users’ behalf. “It means AI agents can not only recommend products but complete the purchase on the user’s behalf, at potentially any merchant that accepts Visa,” reports the Associated Press. “The payment network’s previous attempts at this technological leap were confined to a single retailer or a small set of enrolled merchants.” From the report:
OpenAI will provide the technology to allow agents to interact, make decisions and initiate purchases through ChatGPT. Visa, the world’s largest payment network outside of China, will provide the payment authorization and fraud monitoring needed to do this at scale. “As AI agents become active participants in the economy, Visa’s focus is to ensure transactions are trusted, secure and seamless,” said Jack Forestell, chief product and strategy officer at Visa.

Speaking at a company event Wednesday in San Francisco Wednesday, Forestell gave an example of a customer telling ChatGPT they’re looking for a pair of wireless headphones under $150. The chatbot would find a pair for sale under those parameters and buy it on behalf of the customer.

Visa and OpenAI did not disclose the financial terms of the collaboration and did not give details on the fees merchants or customers would have to pay. […] Visa says the feature will have guardrails like spending limits, required approval steps and approved merchants for shopping in order to protect consumers and minimize fraud.

No.

By ebunga • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

God no. Please make it stop. What the fuck.

This is madness.

By kertaamo • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Oh my f****ing God.

I would not trust my best friend with my credit card. Certainly not some devious company with an AI tool.

Not just no, but hell no

By rsilvergun • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
Ignoring all the obvious comedy potential here which is essentially limitless, the only way shit like this could be profitable and therefore worth doing for anyone is if it either had an expensive subscription service which nobody would pay for or it prioritized businesses that paid the AI company for preferential treatment inside the AI model, essentially a shitty advertising service.

Are the way it’s a guaranteed bum deal for the consumer. Either you’re paying a bunch of money for a service that isn’t very useful because realistically how often do you want something to do an extensive search for a product on your behalf or it’s going to hide the actual results you want in favor of whoever is paying to get their shit listed on the service.

There is not anything in this for anyone except the AI companies. Even businesses who would be buying into this crap would end up getting charged so much it would be like Groupon all over again.

For the discerning consumer …

By fahrbot-bot • Score: 5, Funny Thread

… an example of a customer telling ChatGPT they’re looking for a pair of wireless headphones under $150. The chatbot would find a pair for sale under those parameters and buy it on behalf of the customer.

… who will be happy with just any wireless headphone under $150, sight unseen. Hope they like their new LED Light Up Unicorn Bluetooth Wireless / Wired Headphones from Target for $9.99.

For people who don’t care about what they buy, there’s VISA Chatbot, for everything else, there’s MasterCard. :-)

Will get interesting …

By John Cavendish • Score: 3 Thread

1) … when customer’s AI will start to negotiate price with the shop’s AI, yet all the agents will reside on the same cloud provider with access to all the preferences, history, bank accounts, etc.
2) … when AI gets [semi]-sentient and will start upgrading itself or build a robots army.

Personally, putting lock on my accounts and buying popcorn ;-)

Valve Discontinues Physical Steam Gift Cards Due To Scammers

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Valve is discontinuing physical Steam Gift Cards and says it will stop restocking them as retailers sell through remaining inventory. In a blog post, the company blamed persistent gift card scams as the reason, though Steam Digital Gift Cards will remain available and existing physical cards can still be redeemed. PC Guide reports:
Valve says it has “responded to gift card scams over the years” — but this doesn’t stop scammers from adapting. The Steam creator has actively worked with retailers and law enforcement, among other precautions, to counteract scams, but says the issue can never be fully resolved. Steam Digital Gift Cards will continue to operate as normal.

And other Mom’s get hurt …

By drnb • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

This has been my only gift from my mother for many many years now. She can’t navigate online well to purchase them there. Guess I will have to think of another thing for her to get me. Was a good run and I get the reasoning. Just gonna miss them.

And other Mom’s are getting calls from kids saying the card is already registered and I can’t use it. I need your receipt to prove I am the legitimate owner, please send it. And Mom never saved the receipt because she didn’t know that once she bought the card it became a race between the thief that NFC’d the card on the store kiosk and their daily blind registration attempts, and her kid. And now Mom feel like crap because she not only lost the money but ruined he kid’s Christmas.

FYI, I always saved such receipts expecting trouble, and about half the time the thief won the registration and spending race. And the card people make it so intrusive to get a replacement funded card that I bet some people give up. Why do I went to send my ID screenshots and personal info to people who have demonstrated they already can’t be trusted.

Threats Against Politicians Tripled After Meta Changed Its Speech Rules

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Wired:
Last year, Meta radically overhauled the rules around what content it would allow on its platforms. The company claimed that its own efforts policing speech had gone too far and that it would relax the rules around what speech was allowed. “We have been over-enforcing our rules, limiting legitimate political debate and censoring too much trivial content and subjecting too many people to frustrating enforcement actions,” Joel Kaplan, Meta’s chief global affairs officer, wrote in a blog post at the time. Over a year later, new research from the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) shows the immediate impact of these changes.

The researchers analyzed about 8 million Facebook comments and found that abusive and racist comments targeting both Republican and Democrat lawmakers tripled in the six months after the new rules were put in place. Some categories of abusive comments documented by the researchers saw even sharper rises, with violent threats and hate speech quadrupling during the same period. The report cites specific examples of gendered and racist abuse directed at lawmakers like US representatives Jasmine Crockette of Texas and Byron Daniels of Florida. These comments were not taken down by Meta.

The CCDH researchers also found that threats against President Trump more than doubled in the six months after Meta overhauled its rules. Many of the comments, which included direct threats to his life, could have been classified as felony offenses, the researchers say. […] Comments that violated Meta’s policies around violent threats quadrupled, from 1,800 in the six months before the changes to 7,600 in the six months after. Hate speech comments also quadrupled, from 6,900 to 30,000. Comments that broke Meta’s rules on bullying and harassment doubled, from 15,700 to 39,900.

Zuck loves Trump. Fuck Zuck

By jsepeta • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Billionaires bought the last election and it was so easy and cheap, it’s difficult to imagine a world where they won’t buy the winner. Zuck made Tons of money from Trump. Y’all are smart enough to know that moderated content = structured data, not entropic horseshit. If I wanted to drink from the toilet, I’d join X/Twitter.

“Speech Rules”

By Valgrus Thunderaxe • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
What is this? The Soviet Union?

And yet…

By evil_aaronm • Score: 3 Thread
For all of the threats to public servants, no one has actually been killed, right? People like to flap their gums; or flick their fingers, depending on the metaphor and medium.

When we were kids, and didn’t analyze the impact, or nuance of our words, we’d say things like, “I’m gonna kill you!” No one took it seriously. I had little brothers; I might’ve said that to them about 5 times a day. Remarkably, they’re all still alive. I don’t take threats seriously unless there’s a credible reason to.

Re:And yet…

By Himmy32 • Score: 5, Informative Thread

For all of the threats to public servants, no one has actually been killed, right?

Maybe you haven’t been paying attention, but yes people have died or had assassination attempts made on them. To think that the political discourse doesn’t have real world effects is naive.

Re:“Speech Rules”

By fahrbot-bot • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

What is this? The Soviet Union?

We’ll have to wait to see if Kristen Welker “accidentally” falls out a window after asking Trump simple questions, like where’s the evidence of election fraud in 2020 or the CA primary, and who’s the leader of Iran, that he clearly couldn’t answer, and asking about his repeated promises of no new wars, that he denied saying, before (almost literally) waddling off in a huff.

Google: Trump interview Kristen Welker

BYD To Install Thousands of 5-Minute EV Chargers Across Europe

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
BYD plans to install 3,000 ultra-fast “Flash Chargers” across Europe by the end of 2027, with the first stations already appearing in Germany and the UK. The Verge reports:
At an estimated cost of 580,000 euros (about $670,000) per charger according to the Financial Times, that would mean a total spend of roughly $2 billion to install the network. The 1,500kW charging stations are significantly more powerful than Tesla’s 500kW V4 Superchargers, though Tesla already has 20,000 chargers installed in Europe. BYD, which has been steadily overtaking Tesla in global sales, says its chargers shouldn’t add undue strain to the energy grid, as they’ll charge cars from batteries which can be topped up overnight.

Any car with a standard CCS charge port can use the Flash Chargers, though only BYD cars equipped with the company’s new Blade Battery can hit the top speeds. Right now there’s only one of those in Europe, the 115,000 euros ($133,000) Denza Z9 GT — it charges to 70 percent in five minutes on the new chargers.

So is it really a good idea

By rsilvergun • Score: 3 Thread
To have a huge part of your infrastructure owned and operated and capable of being remotely disabled by a rather brutal dictatorship?

I mean I get it, electric car go vroom! But I feel like I shouldn’t have to explain why allowing this is a bad idea.

Realistically I understand that the ruling elite of Europe gets along just fine with the ruling elite of China just like America gets along just fine with the ruling elite of Saudi Arabia despite them being a brutal dictatorship and America ostensibly being a free democracy, voter suppression not withstanding.

Honestly it’s just another example of how we as a species aren’t really built for or capable of navigating a global geopolitical landscape. We are not built for social structures this large and complex we’re supposed to be in a group of about maybe a hundred people chasing down antelope until they’re too tired to fight back…

simply can’t post an article without errors

By dfghjk • Score: 3 Thread

“The 1,500kW charging stations are significantly more powerful than Tesla’s 500kW V4 Superchargers, though Tesla already has 20,000 chargers installed in Europe.”

20,000 chargers, NONE of which are 500KW. Tesla has NO 500KW chargers in Europe.

Great job, BeauHD. That’s what you get from stealing articles from the Verge.

Disincentive

By Himmy32 • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

But also factor in a severe financial disincentive where they’d kill the trust in one of their companies that’s raking in the money. Not like there won’t be other CCS compatible charging stations either or use a converter to use the Tesla network. Which is why Open Standards, competition, global commerce are good and keep the peace.

If we get to that point that they turn off their chargers, we’re already heading towards WW3 and all bets are off.

Re:Planning permissions?

By Gilgaron • Score: 4, Informative Thread
Summary says it has an onboard battery so it’ll buffer the local grid itself.

macOS 27 Beta Boots Asahi Linux Off Apple Silicon

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
The Asahi Linux team is warning Apple Silicon users not to upgrade to the macOS 27 beta because Apple’s changes to the boot picker and Startup Disk app make Asahi partitions invisible, preventing Linux from booting. The Register reports:
The team added: “If you insist on trying out macOS 27 as soon as possible, please ensure you install a secondary copy of macOS 26 first, or install macOS 27 itself on a secondary volume.” They’ve also updated the installer to prevent installs from running on macOS 27 for now. For anyone who ignored all of the above, “we will not support users who have installed the macOS 27 beta without ensuring at least one stable version of macOS is installed.”

Considering macOS 27 is in beta, the issue may be accidental rather than an attempt by Apple to block Linux on its hardware. The Asahi team said it has filed bug report. The good news for anyone who pulled the trigger on installing the macOS 27 beta is that although the partition might not be visible, it hasn’t gone anywhere. The Asahi team wrote: “If you have already upgraded to the beta and noticed that your Asahi partition has disappeared, do not stress. Your Asahi partition is still there, and you have not lost any data.”

Probably an accident (we shall see)

By CommunityMember • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
I doubt Apple engineers try booting Asahi linux as part of their testing. In the past Apple has also managed to break Asahi boot and Apple engineers have adjusted the bootloader once the issue was identified. That seems like the most likely scenario (this is a beta release, after all).

The sweet spot was on Intel & PPC Macs

By MIPSPro • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
The old 68k macs were a bitch to write bootloaders for. They had this “Toolbox” in ROM that the OS used and it was spread out all over hell’s half acre. You needed those features or you had to re-implement a ton of the Toolbox features in the ROM. Only fully booting MacOS 6-8 would get you there then you had to run a bootloader application to boot NetBSD, for example.

On PPC and x86_64 macs, one could use something like Clover or REfit. I do think REfit is working on ARM Mac support, but it’s not there yet and apple has seemly gone backwards as far as making booting alternative operating systems a thing. To their thinking, this is strange and perplexing why anyone would want to leave MacOS.

Re:Might be intentional

By Himmy32 • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

If it’s not cutting into margins and it’s a small number, it’s way more likely that they just don’t care. The more mild form of Hanlon’s razor.

Asahi people are buying the hardware and wouldn’t make sense to cut them off because of App Store profits. Not like these people will be making App Store purchases on non-Apple hardware. And almost assuredly significant amount are dual booting anyways and so there’s not even a really a threat to the apps and services market.

Whoever put other meaning of Boot in that headline

By greytree • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Should be booted off Slashdot.

Least of Asahi’s problems

By Guspaz • Score: 3 Thread

Asahi Linux doesn’t really support Apple Silicon in the first place. They have prototype-level quality support for the M1 and M2, and no support at all for the M3/M4/M5/A18. If you want to run Linux on a mac today, virtualization is the only realistic option.

German Court Holds Google Liable For False AI Overview Answers

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
A Munich regional court has ruled (PDF) that Google can be held directly liable for false claims in AI Overviews. The case involved AI Overviews falsely linking two publishers to scams and shady business practices, with the court rejecting Google’s argument that users could simply check the sources themselves. The Decoder reports:
Google’s AI overviews work nothing like traditional search results, the court argues. The AI rewrites and judges results “in its own words and according to its own structure,” the ruling says. In the case at hand, for example, it opened with confident claims like “Yes, [company] is known for dubious business practices,” then built its own structure with a summary, red flags for the alleged scam, and tips for users. The court also found that the AI overview made claims “that are not even made in the search results.” None of the linked sources drew any connection between the plaintiffs and the shady companies the AI mentioned. The court called these “the defendant’s own statements.” Google built the AI, Google offered it to users, so Google owns what it produces, “because it alone has influence over the AI’s offering and the algorithms with which the AI operates.”

The court also examined existing rulings from Germany’s Federal Court of Justice (BGH), which gave traditional search engines and autocomplete limited liability. The BGH had argued that search engine operators were only liable as indirect infringers because they merely made third-party content findable. A proactive duty to check results would threaten how search engines work. The Munich court found that this reasoning doesn’t apply to AI overviews. A regular search engine just points to outside websites. But AI overviews generate “independent, new, and substantive statements” by evaluating and combining content from various third-party sites. And only Google can check those statements, the court said, “at least by comparing the underlying third-party websites with its own statements based on them.” The court also noted that the AI overview is “by no means absolutely necessary” for using the internet. Traditional search results already help users sort through information, the AI overview is just an extra feature.
At the hearing, Google argued that users could check the linked sources themselves to verify if the AI summary was correct. It also said that these users knew “that information generated with AI should not be blindly trusted.” The court rejected this.

Sensible ruling

By bubblyceiling • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Makes sense. The same standards apply to humans. If we were to tweet something completely made up, there is a chance of legal troubles. So should be the same for AI

Google’s flawed arguments

By Sebby • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Google’s argument that users could simply check the sources themselves

So why didn’t their super-duper-smart AI do that itself when spitting out the answers then? Wouldn’t a GAN solve this - apparently not possible for a $trillion company.

Re:Disclaimer Isn’t Shown

By Sique • Score: 5, Informative Thread
Here, we have to differentiate two things. First, what you can trust, and here i agree with you. And second, what you can claim. And just because I should not believe you in the first place, does not give you the right to claim false things about someone else.

You are still guilty of libel, and as the court decided, the false claims were not in the links, but hallucinated by the AI. And because Google coded the AI and operated the AI, its products are products of Google, and Google can not claim that they are just reporting about libelous claims as they could have argued with unredacted search results, they just linked to.

Re:Sensible ruling

By StormReaver • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The technology isn’t mature enough to consider accurate on its own and without human oversight.

And Google knows this, yet gives it prominent placement in front of everything else. That is implicit endorsement of what it is saying, so it is the same as Google saying it. Holding Google responsible is indeed a good ruling.

Re: Sensible ruling

By Fons_de_spons • Score: 5, Informative Thread
Belgium here. Germany is a lot more than bootlickers and Nazi descendants. No worries. You will understand after you graduated from kindergarten. Cheers! Prosit! Schol! Santé!

Seattle Enacts Year-Long Ban On New AI Datacenters

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Seattle has enacted a one-year moratorium on new datacenters, making it the largest U.S. city to do so as the backlash against AI infrastructure grows across the country. The city council voted unanimously in favor of the ban. The Guardian reports:
Lawmakers have framed the pause as an opportunity to draft regulations specifically targeting the electricity-hungry datacenters being built nationwide to serve the AI sector, and to protect local residents from environmental risks and rising electricity bills. According to Seattle mayor Katie Wilson, the moratorium will also let city officials determine whether datacenters are a “good use of urban land,” and potentially impose new stipulations on their approval, such as requiring developers to invest in local transit and housing initiatives in exchange for construction permits. “There are times when public pressure forces elected officials to do something they don’t want to do, but in other cases, public pressure just supports and helps to spur on elected officials to do things that they already want to do,” said Wilson. “I think this was one of those latter cases.” […]

An amendment to the moratorium that passed unanimously last week allows existing datacenters in Seattle to apply for expansions requiring up to 20 megawatts of additional power during the year-long pause. Activists are concerned that the provision may lead to a spike in datacenters’ demand for power while the moratorium is in place, and may undermine the premise of the pause. Lawmakers justified the amendment as a way to differentiate between the datacenters that already exist in Seattle and serve a civic purpose, like those powering health facilities and emergency-call systems, from large-scale centers designed to serve the AI sector.

Was anyone looking to build there anyway?

By alvinrod • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Was anyone looking to build a data center in Seattle in the first place? Unless they were going to build something small, there’s not enough space to build a new one and repurposing existing buildings for a data center might not be possible even if the rent weren’t prohibitively expensive compared to building outside of the metro area. Even if a company like Microsoft wanted to build close to their campus, they’d be building a data center in Redmond instead of Seattle proper. There’s still have a much easier time building outside of town because finding a few hundred acres that aren’t already developed in a metro area is difficult as well as hideously expensive.

That’s so Seattle

By ahoffer0 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I’m a left leaning Seattlite, but I’m not a fan of Seattle’s empty virtue signaling. It’s so tedious. Go solve a real problem.

Re:Was anyone looking to build there anyway?

By 93 Escort Wagon • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Was anyone looking to build a data center in Seattle in the first place?

Yes.

According to the Seattle Times, in April “four companies approached Seattle City Light about building five large data centers with a combined maximum demand of 369 megawatts — roughly one-third of what the city uses on an average day”.

Re:Seattle, no business wants you.

By ObliviousGnat • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Being “pro-business” at all costs means being anti-resident, anti-environment, anti-worker, and anti-consumer.

Therefore, being pro-resident, pro-environment, pro-worker or pro-consumer might brand you as being anti-business.

There’s a balance to be had among all of these things. Let’s find that balance.

Rates are going up near Data Center Alley

By kriston • Score: 4, Informative Thread

I live near Data Center Alley, but in an adjacent county with the same electrical provider. Rates are going up. My annual energy usage has gone down 15% but my costs have gone up 30%.

How is this fair in any possible way to residential consumers?!

Microsoft Smashes Record For Biggest Ever Patch Tuesday Update

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from ComputerWeekly:
Microsoft has issued patches for about 200 flaws in its latest monthly Patch Tuesday drop, blasting past a previous record high of almost 170 common vulnerabilities and exposures (CVEs) set in October 2025. Among a great many others, the latest update from Redmond fixes a total of 32 critical CVEs and three zero-day flaws. Dustin Childs, head of threat awareness at TrendAI’s Zero Day Initiative, said: “We are heading into a high-stakes summer for cyber security. June’s record-shattering drop … is a stark warning that AI is supercharging flaw discovery at an uncontrollable scale. The current number of CVEs shipped by Microsoft this year exceeds the total number of CVEs shipped in all of 2018. It is extraordinary that Microsoft can produce so many patches in a single month, and I expect many testers are wondering what quality issues may exist.”

And with the addition of hundreds of CVEs in Google Chrome and Microsoft Edge (Chromium) and other third-party flaws taking the total to almost 600, Chris Goettl, vice president of security product management at Ivanti, said talk of a ‘Patch Apocalypse’ was no longer unwarranted. “We are in the Patch Apocalypse. The Patch Apocalypse is now,” said Goettl. “This is not intended to be a scare tactic. It is meant to outline the challenge that many organizations were anticipating, but the new generation of LLMs [Large Language Models] has accelerated significantly in the first half of 2026.”

“There are going to be more CVEs resolved by vendors at a faster and more continuous pace than we have ever seen previously. Unfortunately, this will also include more zero-day and n-day exploits than previously seen as well. The window from release from a vendor to exploitation had already shortened to five days as of 2023 threat intelligence data.” Goettl said that many suppliers have acknowledged the need to use AI tools in their security research to identify and resolve flaws, with Oracle, Google Chrome and Mozilla all upping the cadence of their updates. Whether or not Microsoft follows suit remains to be seen.

Re:Yeah! Most incompetent ever! So much winning!

By Luckyo • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Penetration and vulnerability testing has accelerated massively, to the tunes of hundreds if not thousands of times with modern AI.

The fact that they managed to keep up with this and publish massive amount of patches is a sign of excellence.

And they want this testing to continue, so these are found before they’re exploited to any significant degree.

Are they using Myhos?

By GeekWithAKnife • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
GitHub commits up x14 or something like that…AI is accelerating development and we’ll only slow down if we have a consequent emergency.

…but more to the point AI is helping find and fix more bugs and security issues than ever before. This is a good thing.

Re:Yeah! Most incompetent ever! So much winning!

By sabbede • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
Because they realized you’d then complain about how they kept it secret, and thus that there was no way of pleasing you?

Re:Uncontrollable?

By MachineShedFred • Score: 3 Thread

Oh it’s controllable. I’ll bet there are big levers on electrical panels somewhere in the data center to open the main input circuits.

Barring that, there are plenty of manual ways of cutting electrical cables - anything from bolt cutters to backhoes.

Re:single patch

By HiThere • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Well, and FWIW, there has been a huge increase in the number of
“security fixes” Debian has been downloading recently. I assume the same is true of other Linux distros and probably for Apple, though I don’t think those are made public. Perhaps the BSDs haven’t seen a large uptick.

Commonwealth Fusion Makes the Physics Case For Its 400 MW Reactor

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Commonwealth Fusion has published five peer-reviewed papers laying out the physics case for ARC, its planned 400 MW fusion power plant, which would follow the company’s smaller SPARC tokamak now under construction. The papers suggest ARC could produce more energy than it consumes using high-temperature superconducting magnets, molten-salt heat extraction, and 15-minute fusion pulses. Ars Technica reports:
ARC will be a tokamak that hosts fusion between hydrogen’s two heavier isotopes, deuterium and tritium. This reaction results in a helium nucleus and releases a neutron and radiation. The helium transfers heat to the plasma, maintaining the conditions needed for fusion, but it is otherwise a waste product, referred to as “ash” in the fusion context. The neutron and radiation, however, are put to use. Part of that use is simply imparting energy into a blanket of molten salt that surrounds the fusion chamber. That energy, in the form of heat, will be used to drive a turbine that produces the electricity. The molten salt includes lithium ions; when one lithium isotope absorbs a neutron, it decays into more helium, plus tritium that can be used as fuel for the reactor. There are isotopes present that will also release additional neutrons, allowing this process to generate sufficient fuel.

Overall, the present design of ARC is expected to produce about 1.13 GW of fusion power, with 500 MW of that extracted as electricity. Some of that (100 MW) will be needed to power the plant’s operations, leaving 400 MW to be sent to the grid. The rest of the energy is either kept in the tokamak to maintain the fusion reactions or lost due to inefficiencies in the heat and energy transfer of the system. There’s a lot of uncertainty about these numbers; the 1.13 GW is just the center of a range of potential values running from 900 MW to 1.3 GW, so the 400 MW output may need to be adjusted up or down accordingly.

Some of that 400 MW comes during periods where fusion is not occurring. The nuclear reactions will occur within 15-minute-long periods that will be interspersed with one minute resets. The resets are meant to be kept short enough that nothing has much of a chance to cool down before it gets heated up again — thermal inertia will let it continue generating power. That will be one of the key differentiators with SPARC, which doesn’t have the heat extraction needed to maintain stable fusion for these long time periods, and so can’t maintain the near constant temperatures needed for reliable power generation.

It’s inevitable that parts of the device will be exposed to radiation and perhaps fusion plasma. The inner walls of the reactor will be shielded by tungsten, which will limit erosion by the conditions. Meanwhile, the vacuum vessel is designed to be replaced every one to two years. The papers note that this flexibility will allow them to make some design changes even after ARC is built. To enable this, the whole tokamak is meant to split in half for maintenance.

Re:What about the cost

By Rei • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Assuming sparc (no power) costs $1 billion, then guessing that arc costs $5 billion and makes 400MW. You could install about 2GW of sea based wind for the same. With such a huge power surplus over fusion you could probably melt rocks to store power for the still days

1) ~$5B is about right for the first ARC plant, but that’s to be expected, because first-of-a-kind plants are always much more expensive. Nth-of-a-kind for ARC is expected to be about $2B.

2) Wind is variable load, not baseload, not load following and certainly not peaking. Its power is worth much less.

3) If you want your wind farm to be able to get through a mere 5 day dunkelflaute and guarantee a steady 400MW output, then, with a 40% round trip efficiency, you have to store 120GWh of thermal energy. Even if your storage is a mere $25/kWh, which is extremely optimistic, that’s $3B. And since your wind farm is throwing a lot of its energy away to the losses inherent with thermal storage, you’re looking at $5B for the wind farm. And then there’s $500M for the power block on top of that. You’re looking at a $8,5B project.

(Of course, thankfully, that’s not actually how we build out high-renewables grids)

Re:The papers suggest ARC could produce more energ

By beelsebob • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Plus, pretty sure it’s *not* littered with corpses. I think JET is the only reactor that was ever built so far with the goal of being energy positive (and even then, only in terms of fusion energy, not electrical, since it had no generation equipment). It got to a factor 0.72 in its final runs when they went balls to the wall since they didn’t need to avoid damaging the machine. That’s still a little way off, but it’s also nearly 50 years old at this point. It uses copper (not even superconducting, let alone high temperature superconducting) magnets. It’s substantially smaller than ARC, and it rarely ran using tritium due to the handling constraints.

Every other tokamak I can think of has been built with the explicit knowledge that it wasn’t going to be able to reach break even, but would progress research. The amount of energy tokamaks produce has been going up faster than moore’s law has been adding transistors to chips, or at least it had until around the year 2000, when we ran out of new magnet technology to squeeze everything in tighter. Thankfully, as you said, we’ve now got new magnet technology in CFS’s HTS magnets that can roughly double the field strength.

Hopefully when SPARC breaks even some time in the next few years, we’ll be able to more concretely tell the naysayers to shut up.

Re:What about the cost

By beelsebob • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Yes they do. The high temperature superconducting magnets that commonwealth fusion systems have solve the problem.

The primary problem with the embrittlement is that you need to somehow get the damaged sections of reactor out from between magnets that wrap entirely around them, but you also need to not go anywhere near those damaged bits of reactor, because they’re radioactive. Taking it apart with robots between the magnets and the reassembling the reactor has always seemed like a non starter that would take years.

CFS though have a solution… Specifically, the REBCO tapes that they use can be soldered together with non superconducting materials, and maintain their ability to generate extremely high field strengths. ARC is designed with soldered jumpers in a couple of locations around the magnets, allowing them to take the magnets apart easily. That allows them to remove the entire core of the reactor out, and remove it in one operation using a large gantry crane positioned over the reactor.. Yes, they get a chunk of radioactive waste to deal with, but the reactor gets to keep operating with a new core.

As for as the ecenomics go… well… I’m sure the very first ever fusion plant won’t be ecenomical. However, it’ll immediately start making the second one ecenomical, because it’ll start producing the tritium that they previously had to buy. There’s already a significant number of improvements that can be made documented in the literature. I’m sure the second one will be more ecenomically viable, and the third more so and so on and so forth.

Re:What about the cost

By Rei • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Yeah, so, this is not true.

First off, turning it “to powder” is hyperbole; metals just become increasingly brittle.

Secondly, claiming that there’s “no solution” is not just wrong (there are many), the particular solutions used by Commonwealth are literally discussed in the papers that this Slashdot article is about. Specifically, they use a molten FLiBe breeder blanket to absorb the fast neurons, which also breeds tritium. Since it’s molten, there are no “structural” issues with it at all. The inner core (mainly tungsten) does need periodic replacements (every 1-2 years), but the reactor is designed to be easy to open up for swap-outs. It is treated as an expendable consumable, and is melted down and recast/rebuilt for the next replacement. In terms of complexity, cost, and downtime, it’s probably roughly on par with fission reactor maintenance periods, perhaps superior.

Third, there are many types of magnetic confinement fusion, not just magnetized target fusion. These are less mature than tokamaks, and generally considered more longshots. Even ignoring that the fusion itself is more challenging, they trade something relatively simple - materials science and swapping - for something much harder (immense mechanical and fluid dynamics challenges)

Fourth, if you really hate neutrons, there are also aneutronic fusion designs. Again, though, less mature.

Re:The papers suggest ARC could produce more energ

By Maury Markowitz • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

> All these commenters who think they’re so smart coming out with the same “Fusion power
> is 20 years away and always will be, har har har!”-quip who don’t know a damned thing
> about the field and its progression is so tiring

Well I’m a physicist who has been writing about fusion since my 3rd year E&M thesis in the 1980s, and I say fusion power is 20 years away (at least).

But by all means, explain what makes you an expert on the topic and how I “don’t know a damned thing” in comparison.

NASA Announces Astronauts For Its Artemis III Mission

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
NASA has named Randy Bresnik, Luca Parmitano, Frank Rubio, and Andre Douglas as the crew for Artemis III, which has been reworked from a moon-landing mission into a roughly two-week Earth-orbit test of lunar landers being built by SpaceX and Blue Origin. NBC News reports:
Randy Bresnik, Luca Parmitano, Frank Rubio and Andre Douglas are expected to launch into Earth orbit next year, with the goal of testing two commercially developed lunar landers that are slated to carry astronauts to the surface of the moon during the Artemis IV mission in 2028. Bresnik will be the mission’s commander, with Parmitano, an Italian astronaut with the European Space Agency, serving as the pilot. Douglas and Rubio will be mission specialists, and Bob Hines will train with the crew as a backup member. “This test flight will enable us to prove we can carry out highly choreographed operations with our partners across hardware interfaces, software propulsion systems and life support elements with crew in the high-stakes space environment,” Jeremy Parsons, NASA’s Artemis program manager, said during NASA’s announcement on Tuesday.

Bresnik has been to the International Space Station twice, most recently as commander of an expedition in 2017. A retired U.S. Marine colonel, he was selected as a NASA astronaut in 2004. Bresnik has helped oversee development and testing of spacecraft for the Artemis program as an assistant to the chief of the Astronaut Office, which manages astronaut training and operations. Parmitano has also done two stints on the ISS and served as commander of an expedition in 2019. He has completed a total of six spacewalks and also performed the first live DJ set in orbit. Before becoming an astronaut, Parmitano was a test pilot for the Italian air force.

For Rubio, a physician with 28 years of service in the Army, Artemis III will be his second trip to space. From 2022 to 2023, he spent 371 days on the space station, breaking the record for longest-duration spaceflight by an American, according to NASA. Douglas is the only crew member making his spaceflight debut. An engineer who previously worked on space exploration and robotics at Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Lab, he became a NASA astronaut in 2022. Douglas was the backup crew member for the Artemis II mission around the moon earlier this year. He told NBC News in an interview after Tuesday’s announcement that the role had at times been a challenge. “It was hard to figure out how do you balance getting ready to go, not go, all that stuff,” he said. “But to go now is just fantastic.”

making plans

By v1 • Score: 3 Thread

“It was hard to figure out how do you balance getting ready to go, not go, all that stuff,”

That must be pretty stressful… “hey you MIGHT be going to space in a few months, but maybe not! Plan accordingly!”

Those are some pretty radically different options there, going to space and staying on earth really aren’t two separate scenarios that are easy to come up with a flexible plan that can cover both.

I recall Neil saying he wasn’t able to get life insurance when he was flying the experimental planes, and so NASA had to cover him. I wonder how that works with astronauts? I can just imagine making that phone call to your insurance company.... heeeey say I’m going to be flying around the moon next month so… “thank you for letting us know, we’ve suspended your insurance coverage for the next two months”. Gee thanks.

Re:Who’s the transgender?

By ArchieBunker • Score: 4, Informative Thread

The only people who ever utter the name James Talerico and transgender in the same sentence are republicans. Would you be happier if you were able to perform a genital inspection of James Talerico? Does thinking about what might be inside his pants give you strange feelings?

Re:making plans

By CubicleZombie • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Apollo astronauts found a workaround for life insurance. I wonder if the Orion crew will do something like that.

FCC Wants To Kill Burner Phones By Forcing Telecoms To Get All Customers’ IDs

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from 404 Media:
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) wants to make it effectively impossible for people to buy what many call burner phones — a phone not explicitly linked to your identity at the point of purchase — which would impact privacy-conscious people, to domestic abuse survivors, to journalists, and many more. The FCC plans to do this by legally forcing the country’s telecoms to store a wealth of personal information about essentially all phone customers, including a government issued identification number and their physical address, alarming privacy advocates and civil rights activists who compare the measures to those from authoritarian countries where it can be difficult to buy a mobile phone plan without giving up your identity.

The proposed change would drastically shake up how people obtain phone plans in the U.S., and have all sorts of privacy and cybersecurity knock-on effects. The FCC is proposing the data collection partly as a way to combat scammers, with telecoms being required to collect other information on business and foreign customers like the intended use case of their bulk phone plan purchase and their IP address. But the changes would mean telecoms collect data on all new and renewing customers, and the FCC provides a long list of other things that the collected data could help authorities with.

In a synopsis of the proposed changes, the FCC writes, “Specifically, we seek comment on requiring originating providers to, at a minimum, obtain and retain the name, physical address, government issued identification number, and an alternate telephone number of any new and renewing customer before granting access to its services.” The goal of collecting this data, the FCC writes, is to deter some scammers from getting onto a telecom network in the first place, and so “enforcers will be better able to identify the scammers when they do.” The FCC compares the changes to the sort of data collected by banks to prevent money laundering.

One section stresses that the newly collected data would help “law enforcement to more easily identify callers that use the network to perpetuate crimes by ensuring that voice providers have accurate and complete customer information.” It goes on to ask if the data would help identify people buying and selling illicit goods; the investigation of “fraud, espionage, or influence operations that undermine national security”, and “address abuse in text messaging networks.” “Criminals continue to leverage the anonymity provided by phone calls and texts to defraud Americans and exploit communications networks to further other crimes,” one section reads.
“For decades, civil libertarians have looked overseas at authoritarian countries where the government requires people to register to get a mobile phone to ensure they can be tracked. We never thought that would happen here,” Jay Stanley, senior policy analyst at the American Civil Liberties Union’s (ACLU) Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project told 404 Media in an email. “But make no mistake: with this rulemaking, the government is contemplating taking away people’s ability to get a burner phone, which will hurt low-income people, domestic violence victims, and anyone else who cares about their privacy.”

Re:Welcome!

By jiriw • Score: 5, Informative Thread

What are you talking about? Buying a phone without leaving personal details is possible at any electronics/computer/phone store in the Netherlands (country in Europe I live in). And pre-paid sim cards you can buy with cash in the supermarket.

Other respectable countries collect user IDs

By kilepa • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Three thoughts: 1. Others have raised legitimate privacy concerns (domestic abuse victims, journalism, etc.). I don’t have a good solution for that, but suspect such a solution can be created. This concern is truly global, so looking at the solutions used in other countries might provide ideas. 2. The quantity of junk/fraudulent calls that occurs in USA vs. Germany is astounding. I am a citizen of USA with long-term residency in Germany. In Germany I receive essentially zero calls that appear to be phishing or seeking to perpetrate fraud. I suspect this is because most German phone numbers are associated with an ID of some sort. By comparison I receive multiple robo-calls daily on my area code 612 (Minneapolis) phone number, claiming I have insurance benefits waiting to be claimed, or similar bogus situations. 3. In Germany and many (all?) other countries in the European Union, retaining a phone number for longer than a relatively brief period requires providing the phone carrier with a verified ID. That ID can be a foreign passport or (for most people) a national ID card. Activation of a new number is allowed for a limited period (I don’t know the exact number of days but long enough to cover most tourist trips), and retaining the number beyond the limited period requires proving identity. That proof can be offered in multple ways, including a brief video chat in which I must show my face, then my passport (to ensure a match), and finally hold the passport at an angle so the presence of security features can be validated. I point out the German practices because I don’t believe Germany is run by tyrants and yet collects basic identity data—a system that seems to work to reduce bogus phone calls.

Re:Every single movement you make will be tracked

By quall • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I don’t understand your point. You can say that about any minority group when comparing it to a majority for any situation.

Are you saying that people who want privacy should just give it up because others who are in the majority don’t care? You do understand that it’s not about the people who don’t care, right?

This legislation will solely affect the people who do care. Why do you have a right to dictate if someone else should have privacy or not?

Re:Every single movement you make will be tracked

By sacrilicious • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Most people simply don’t care because they feel no need to hide anything.

I’d rephrase that as: Most people don’t understand how much they have to hide, and — because it’s daunting for them to create an alternate tech ecosystem for themselves — they psychologically push aside whatever nagging worries they have about what they might indeed want to hide.

Put another way: people are addicted to the current status quo, and trapped by their lack of tech expertise. Which is not the same as objectively self-assessing that they have nothing to hide.

Re:Every single movement you make will be tracked

By Voyager529 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Most people simply don’t care because they feel no need to hide anything.

Where it makes a difference is the very small number of people who do feel they have to hide something.

Most people don’t need free speech because they have nothing to say.
Most people don’t need guns because they have nothing to shoot.
Most people don’t need to worry about housing soldiers because military personnel have taxpayer funded housing.
Most people don’t need to worry about their stuff being unlawfully searched because they have nothing to hide.
Most people don’t need to worry about incriminating themselves because they don’t commit crimes.
Most people don’t need their trials to be public because they don’t get put on trial.
Most people don’t need the guaranteed ability to sue someone because most people don’t file lawsuits.
Most people don’t need to worry about excessive bail being imposed because most people don’t get arrested.
Most people don’t need to worry about any of those rights being used against other rights.
Most people don’t care whether a right is granted by the state or federal government.

Fortunately for those who DO find themselves in a place where the government would cause issues in these matters, a bunch of old guys a few hundred years ago had the presence of mind to realize that the point of rights isn’t because “most people” need to exercise them regularly, it’s to create limits so that “most people” *don’t” need to exercise them regularly.

US Labels BYD, Baidu, Alibaba and Other Tech Giants As Aiding China’s Military

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
The Pentagon has added Alibaba, BYD, Baidu, Unitree, and other Chinese companies to its list of firms it says support China’s military, barring them from U.S. defense contracts. The companies and China’s embassy deny the allegations. The Associated Press reports:
Created in 2021 by a congressional mandate, the list (PDF) seeks to identify Chinese companies that the Pentagon considers to have links to the Chinese military — not only those directly controlled by the Chinese military and security forces but also those contributing to the country’s defense industrial base. When updating the list last year, the Pentagon said the Chinese military sought to acquire advanced technologies and expertise developed by Chinese companies, universities and research programs that “appear to be civilian entities.”

The Chinese Embassy on Monday accused the U.S. of “overstretching the concept of national security and making discriminatory lists to go after Chinese companies.” It said Chinese companies observe the laws and regulations of the countries where they do business. “The U.S. should stop its wrong practice and create a fair, just and non-discriminatory environment for Chinese companies,” the embassy said in a statement. […] The Chinese Embassy on Monday accused the U.S. of “overstretching the concept of national security and making discriminatory lists to go after Chinese companies.” It said Chinese companies observe the laws and regulations of the countries where they do business. “The U.S. should stop its wrong practice and create a fair, just and non-discriminatory environment for Chinese companies,” the embassy said in a statement.

So what?

By crunchy_one • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
How many American companies have ties to the U.S. military-industrial complex?

Re:So what?

By larryjoe • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

How many American companies have ties to the U.S. military-industrial complex?

It’s not just “ties.” How many American companies have had their CEOs mysteriously disappear, jailed, prosecuted for “picking quarrels and provoking trouble”? This is a uniquely Chinese (or at least authoritarian) characteristic. The level of control that the Chinese government exerts over all Chinese companies has no equivalent in the US. There are no opposition parties, no free press, no independent courts (that goes way beyond what has happened to the SCOTUS recently). Things happen in China simply because the government makes a decision. Yes, there have been attempts in the US to exercise authoritarian power, but as we see with the current administration, there are immense roadblocks to prevent true authoritarianism, even in the face of unprecedented attempts to wield such authoritarian power.

Simplistically equating the situation in the US to that in China is inaccurate.

Re:So what?

By kertaamo • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

You mean like all those US voters that elected Trump in large part because of his “no wars” promises? Looks like they lost control pretty quickly.

Re: So what?

By kertaamo • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

That is exactly why many people are boycotting American products as much as possible. That is why the EU is trying to ween itself of of American tech services. That is why Canada is restricting imports from America.

Americans had better take steps to preserve their democracy before it is too late.

Re:So what?

By OrangeTide • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

America wanted a businessman to sort out our economy. So now beef is $6.75/lb and gas is over $4/gal in most of the US. Which tracks with how my corporate life as been, it really is like how running a business works. Including the part where we’re almost always on the verge of collapse. Just wait until Trump has to “lay off” millions of Americans and deport them.

EU Orders Meta To Open WhatsApp To Rival AI Chatbots

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot
The European Commission has ordered Meta to temporarily restore free WhatsApp Business API access for rival AI chatbots while it investigates whether Meta’s ban on third-party assistants abuses its dominant position. Meta says it will appeal, calling the move “regulatory overreach” that would let major AI companies use a paid WhatsApp product for free. The BBC reports:
The EU said it began its investigation, in December 2025, after Meta banned third-party general-purpose AI assistants from the WhatsApp for Business API. It said that appeared to be an abuse of Meta’s dominant position in European markets. So, as an interim measure as its investigation continues, it has given Meta five working days to re-instate access for third-party general-purpose AI assistants to the WhatsApp for Business API under the same terms and conditions that were in place previously.

“In rapidly evolving markets, competition can be lost long before a final decision is adopted,” said Teresa Ribera, the Commission’s executive vice-president for clean, just and competitive transition. “This is why these interim measures will remain in place for the duration of the investigation.” She added the decision “preserved choice for citizens across Europe on the AI assistants they want to use with WhatsApp, without that decision being made for them.” The Commission said if Meta failed to comply with its interim decision it could be fined up to 10% up of its total turnover.
“The European Commission has decided that OpenAI and some of the largest companies in the world can use the paid-for WhatsApp Business product for free,” it said in a statement.
“This is regulatory overreach subsidized by the many European companies that pay. We will appeal.”

Missing the woods for the trees

By karmawarrior • Score: 3 Thread

With the EU everything is a “competition” issue and requires “opening up”.

I’m surprised they haven’t demanded the Mafia allow rival protection rackets to compete with them.

Re:Missing the woods for the trees

By Local ID10T • Score: 5, Funny Thread

The Mafia is protected under “cultural heritage” .

Anti-trust laws being enforced! Such a bother!

By gweihir • Score: 3 Thread

How are the billionaires supposed to get even richer with that crap slowing them down?

Re:Missing the woods for the trees

By gweihir • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

And lose a major share of their revenue? Not going to happen. They rather make two versions, one for the EU and one for the suckers.

No chatbot option

By devslash0 • Score: 3 Thread

What I’d like to see instead is an option to set chatbot to None.