Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Scientists Edited Human Embryo Genes. But Questions Remain
  2. Failing CS Grades Soar At UC Berkeley As Professors See Greater AI Usage
  3. Cheaper EV Sales are Increasing
  4. EU’s Tech Sovereignty Package Includes 29 Pages on Open Source, Says Open Source Initiative
  5. Hospital Ordered to Pay $13M Over 2022 Death of Star Trek’s Nichelle Nichols
  6. Ladybird Browser Stops Accepting Public Pull Requests
  7. New Power Banks Released By BMX With Safer Semi-Solid-State Batteries
  8. Teen Social Media Bans Risk Strengthening Big Tech’s Dominance, Warns Bluesky Exec
  9. Early Research Suggests a Path to Predict and Prevent Lung Cancer
  10. Criticisms Rise Before Vote on America’s Cryptocurrency ‘Clarity Act’
  11. 2027’s ‘Tomb Raider’ Remake: Unreal Engine 5 and AI-Assisted Assets ‘Refined’ By Humans
  12. Utah Residents Sue Officials Over Kevin O’Leary Data Center Plan
  13. Scientists Find Wind Blowing From Our Milky Way’s Black Hole
  14. Small Modular Nuclear Reactor Reaches Criticality In First Test
  15. The US Military Quietly Turned GPS Into a Global ‘Numbers Station,’ Evidence Suggests

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Scientists Edited Human Embryo Genes. But Questions Remain

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“A DNA-editing feat involving editing the genes of early stage embryos was announced this week,” reports the Wall Street Journal.

They describe the feat as “a far cry from designer babies, but nevertheless a step in that direction.”
Dieter Egli, an associate professor of developmental cell biology at Columbia University and his co-authors, including Nathan Treff of Nucleus Genomics, a New York-based DNA-testing startup, say the technology could help fix disease-causing mutations in embryos. “We’re not throwing the final ‘OK, you will have gene-edited babies tomorrow’ at the public,” said Egli. “That is a process that can occur through discussion matched with scientific progress....”

Previous gene-editing efforts have often used Crispr, which can cut out parts of the DNA sequence, but the technology can also cause damage if the wrong DNA is targeted or cut out. In 2018, Chinese scientist He Jianku said he used Crispr to tweak DNA in human embryos and was imprisoned for the work. The technology Egli’s group used, called base editing, allows them to target individual DNA letters in sequences more precisely with fewer adverse effects… Egli’s group focused on altering two genes, one that can raise the risk of heart disease and one that is tied to blood disorders like sickle cell disease, and the research showed they were sometimes able to do so successfully, in the same embryo, without damage.

“I am generally supportive of the concept of embryo editing to prevent genetic disease,” said Dr. Paula Amato, a fertility expert at Oregon Health & Science University who wasn’t involved in the research… Base editing has been used in human embryos before, according to peer-reviewed studies. The technology was used to correct a disease-causing mutation and an Alzheimer’s disease-risk gene variant, said Alexis Komor, associate professor of biochemistry and molecular biophysics at the University of California, San Diego, who wasn’t involved in the work. “There really is not any unmet medical or clinical need for this, especially from an in vitro fertilization perspective,” Komor said. “Usually what you’ll hear is that they’re doing it just so that you know we can prevent genetic diseases, but there are so many other better ways to do that.”

Using embryo editing to create babies is illegal in the U.S. and many other countries. Scientists have long worried that it is a slippery slope and that the technology could ultimately be used to promote eugenics. Her worry is that “they’re basically building a blueprint” for more ethically problematic forms of embryo editing. “In my opinion, I think this is a huge no-no,” Komor said. “There’s just no ethical way to use this....”

Nucleus Genomics Chief Executive Kian Sadeghi said his company plans to fund Egli’s further research, building on the new findings. His company sells a polygenic embryo-screening product, which screens prospective parents’ embryos and produces risk scores for their likelihood of developing disease, as well as factors like height, IQ and eye color. The company has said the IQ predictions are limited in accuracy.
The research was published online Monday on a preprint server.

Failing CS Grades Soar At UC Berkeley As Professors See Greater AI Usage

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
The University of California at Berkeley discovered the percentage of failing grades in multiple CS classes this spring “is significantly higher than past semesters,” reports the campus’s student newspaper.

“Instructors point to students’ increased reliance on AI, lack of mathematical preparedness and understaffing as potential contributing factors.”
According to [coursework platform] Berkeleytime, 35.3% of CS 10 students and 10.6% of CS 61A students received F’s in spring 2026. In spring 2025 and spring 2024, the percentage of F’s did not exceed 10% for either class. The electrical engineering and computer sciences department’s grading guidelines state that 7% of students in lower division courses, including CS 10 and CS 61A, should receive D’s and F’s…

[UC Berkeley teaching professor Dan Garcia, who taught both classes] believes the “primary driver” of these abnormally high failing rates is due to a “vast increase in academic dishonesty” due to students’ usage of large language models, such as Claude, ChatGPT and Google Gemini. “Some of the numbers that you saw from the number of students who receive failing grades were because we caught them (cheating) and prosecuted them and are sending their cases to the Center for Student Conduct,” Garcia said. “But in other cases, it’s students who are leaning a little too hard on LLMs to do their work for them, and then at exam time just really aren’t ready.” According to Garcia, nearly 30 students in CS 10 were “caught cheating on take-home exams” in spring 2026…

In addition to overreliance on AI, Garcia also pointed out that many students are underprepared mathematically, a concern echoed by campus associate teaching professor Gireeja Ranade. Ranade noticed a similar lack of prerequisite mathematical skills in her spring 2026 EECS 127 class, “Optimization Models in Engineering,” which she described as “differently challenging” to teach this semester. The class saw a 16.8% F rate, far higher than the 5% of D’s and F’s that the EECS department describes as “typical” for an upper division course…

Both Garcia and Ranade have joined more than 1,300 UC faculty in signing a petition calling for the reinstatement of ACT and SAT standardized testing scores for STEM admissions in the UC system.
Thanks to long-time Slashdot reader theodp for sharing the article.

Lack of math skills?

By kbrannen • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Looking that course up it seems that’s about proving algorithms and other stuff, so maybe you do need more advanced math skills for such a theoretical course. My 39 years of experience is that 2 years of high school algebra is good enough for the typical programmer. I’ve worked 2 jobs in my time where higher math was needed, but the employer hired someone with a Phd in math to figure out what needed to be done, the rest of us did the UIs, the DBs, the infrastructure, etc. I’m not dismissing higher math, there are places where it’s useful, but most programmers don’t need it. Hmm, I also see that course isn’t required to graduate, so some of those students shouldn’t be taking it if they’re not sure of their skills/knowledge.

Standards, not gaussians

By ClickOnThis • Score: 3 Thread

It’s perfectly fine to have standards. And those who don’t meet them should fail.

But on the other hand, those who do meet them should pass. So, I was surprised to read this in TFS:

The [Berkeley] electrical engineering and computer sciences department’s grading guidelines state that 7% of students in lower division courses, including CS 10 and CS 61A, should receive D’s and F’s

Not if they meet the standards of the course. Look, I know it’s unlikely that you’ll get an exceptional lower-division class where everyone is deserving of a pass. But it can happen, and “grading guidelines” should not force failing grades on people who met the course requirements.

Cheaper EV Sales are Increasing

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Sales have increased for Hyundai’s under-$35,000 IONIQ 5, totalling 18,395 for the first five months of 2026, reports Electrek, “up 16% from the same period last year.”

But meanwhile BYD’s overseas sales surpassed 160,000 for the first time last month, “up 80% from May 2025 and 19% from the previous record of 135,098 set in April.”
Through the first five months of 2026, BYD sold 616,263 vehicles overseas. In May, overseas sales accounted for over 41% of BYD’s total sales. In several major markets, including the UK, BYD surpassed Tesla and Kia to become the best-selling EV brand through April. “With fuel prices remaining high, more drivers are turning to electric vehicles as a smarter and more economical choice,” Bono Ge, BYD UK’s Country Manager, said last month.
Elsewhere Electrek notes that Toyota’s bZ (starting at under $35,000) was the third-best-selling EV in the U.S. in the first three months of 2026, behind only the Tesla Model 3 and Model Y. “Last month, bZ sales doubled from May 2025, with 2,646 units sold.”

And meanwhile the first Volkswagen ID. Polo and Cupra Raval models “rolled off the production line at the Group’s Martorell plant in Spain, the first of several new affordable, mass-market EVs.”
Starting at €24,995 ($29,000) and €26,000 ($30,100), the ID. Polo and Cupra Raval are the first models from the Group’s Electric Urban Car Family

[T]he first customer deliveries are scheduled to begin later this summer and into the fall. Following the ID. Polo and Cupra Raval, Volkswagen will introduce new members to the Electric Urban Car Family, including the ID. Cross, an electric version of the T-Cross, later this year. According to Volkswagen, the ID. Cross will start at around €28,000 ($32,500).

water is wet

By redback • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

yeah if you make things affordable more people buy them.

EVs are already better for most non-commercial use

By Smonster • Score: 3 Thread
My next vehicle will definitely be a long range EV. My household has two motor vehicles. One ICE. One PHEV. When we replace the ICE it will be with a long range EV. But we also will replace the PHEV with another PHEV when the time comes vs another EV. It is for the similar reasons I have three ways to heat my house in tne winter.

But EVs are already better in almost every way compared to ICE vehicles. The only thing ICE vehicles have over EVs is better refueling times and towing. (And it’s probably easier to hike in a gallon or three of gas than the equivalent electricity. But having back up solar panels could solve that in some situations with an EV too.)

A PHEV solves refueling issue for road trips until the interstate and destination charging situation improves. But most of the time anyone with a garage or driveway are likely to just charge overnight. So charging isn’t really an issue. Anything with 300+ mile range would easily get me to NYC or DC and back home without worrying about charging too. Even if I got caught in traffic. But for longer trips, charging on the road is not ideal.

Re:Also EVs are all crap good for nothing because

By madbrain • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Complete BS.

When looking strictly at tire particulates in isolation, the 20% to 26% emission increase from EVs has a negligible, almost imperceptible impact on clear skies and visual haze.
While the environmental protection agency identifies microscopic particulate matter ($PM_{2.5}$) as the primary driver of regional haze and reduced atmospheric visibility, tire dust behaves in a way that prevents it from creating smog or muddying the horizon. [1, 2]
The physical mechanics of tire dust limit its impact on clear skies through three specific factors:
## 1. The Particles are Physically Too Heavy to Create Haze [3]
Atmospheric haze is caused when light hits thousands of tiny, microscopic particles suspended in the air, scattering the light waves and blurring the horizon. [4]

* Tire Dust is Mostly Coarse: Up to 99% of the mass shed by an EV tire consists of large, heavy fragments (typically 10 to 100+ micrometers in diameter).
* Rapid Ground Fallout: Because these pieces are so large and heavy, gravity pulls them down immediately. They fly off the tire and settle into the roadside dirt or gutters within seconds. They do not stay suspended in the atmosphere long enough to scatter sunlight or form a visible shroud of smog. [3, 5, 6]

## 2. Lack of Volatile Organic Chemical Evaporation
True sky-blocking smog requires gaseous chemical reactions. Sunlit skies turn hazy when volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and nitrogen oxides mix in the heat to generate ground-level ozone and ultra-fine chemical aerosols.

* Isolated tire dust is a solid, stable compound made of vulcanized synthetic rubber, carbon black, and heavy metals. It does not evaporate into the air as a gas, meaning the extra rubber shed by an EV does not feed the chemical reactions that create regional smog or overcast city horizons. [7]

## 3. Extremely Confined Geographic Footprint
Particles that stay aloft long enough to reduce visibility are usually tiny enough to be carried for hundreds of miles by the wind. By contrast, the small percentage of tire dust that does manage to become airborne ($PM_{2.5}$) has a highly localized presence: [8, 9]

* Field measurements show that airborne tire particulates drop off drastically just 50 to 100 meters away from the roadway.
* Because this dust settles so quickly right next to the asphalt, it remains a localized roadside pollutant rather than rising into the upper atmosphere to create a regional blanket of haze. [8]

## Summary of Isolated Impact
If you look exclusively at the tires, an EV will drop roughly 20% more solid black rubber fragments onto the physical ground. However, because these pieces lack the buoyancy to float and the volatile gases to react with sunlight, this extra debris cannot create atmospheric haze. The sky directly above a highway remains just as clear regardless of the increase in tire wear mass.
If you would like to look at what does impact the sky, we can look at how regenerative braking affects the creation of airborne metallic dust, or how eliminating tailpipe exhaust reduces regional smog. [10]

[1] [https://www.epa.gov](https://www.epa.gov/pm-pollution/particulate-matter-pm-basics)
[2] [https://www.facebook.com](https://www.facebook.com/virginiatech/posts/how-does-tire-wear-from-our-vehicles-contribute-to-pollution-researchers-at-virg/689983136996111/)
[3] [https://www.airflows.cee.vt.edu](https://www.airflows.cee.vt.edu/portfolio/tire-wear-particles/)
[4] [https://ww2.arb.ca.gov](https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/resources/visibility-reducing-particles-and-health)
[5] [https://en.wikipedia.org](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haze)
[6] [https://www.sierraclub.org](https://www.sierraclub.org/sierra/2024-2-summer/material-world/evs-pollution-tailpipe-tires)
[7] [https://nypost.com](https://nypost.com/2024/03/05/business/evs-release-more-toxic-emissions-are-worse-for-the-environment-study/)
[8] [https://books.rsc.org](https://books.rsc.org/books/edited-volume/675/chapter/377700/Local-acting-Air-Pollutant-Emissions-from-Road)
[9] [https://www3.epa.gov](https://www3.epa.gov/ttnemc01/prelim/otm31appC.pdf)
[10] [https://ev.com](https://ev.com/news/study-reveals-evs-produce-less-brake-and-tire-pollution-with-fewer-non-exhaust-emissions)

EU’s Tech Sovereignty Package Includes 29 Pages on Open Source, Says Open Source Initiative

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Friday the Open Source Initiative welcomed the EU’s new tech sovereignty package, noting that “over a third of the 29-page document is devoted to Open Source.”

The nonprofit OSI — maintainers of the Open Source definition — submitted their official feedback in February, and notes that “many” of their key requests were addressed, “as well as some exciting new announcements!”
One of the biggest barriers to Open Source adoption has been public procurement. Too often, tenders have been designed around proprietary solutions, ignoring the benefits of Open Source and locking public institutions into closed ecosystems. The OSI called for procurement rules that prioritize interoperability, reusability, and vendor independence. The package takes a major step forward in this area. The EU pledges to make the public sector an anchor consumer for Open Source solutions. The Commission plans to reform procurement rules to remove barriers for Open Source, provide better guidance to EU countries on procurement criteria to avoid excluding Open Source, and uphold the “public money, public code” principle when procuring software development. Both proposals align with the OSI’s feedback. The next critical step is the EU’s public procurement law reform. The OSI will continue advocating to ensure these pledges translate into action.

Beyond procurement, the OSI highlighted challenges faced by Open Source communities in Europe, particularly difficulties accessing investment and expertise to commercialize and scale projects. The Commission has responded by committing to ensure Open Source companies are considered for funding under the European Competitiveness Fund (ECF). It also plans to create “Open Source business accelerators” that will offer mentorship, training, legal and licensing consulting, and business development support, including marketing. Additionally, the Commission will work to raise industry awareness of Open Source solutions by leveraging the EU’s existing business support networks. These measures directly address the OSI’s concerns and could significantly boost the Open Source ecosystem in Europe…

[I]n our feedback, we called for the continuation of the Next Generation Internet (NGI) initiative that has funded many Open Source projects, and for the creation of a European Sovereign Tech Fund to fund ongoing maintenance and features development to meet the EU’s needs. We also highlighted the need to mainstream Open Source in other funding opportunities (like the €100bn+ Horizon Europe programme). The Commission’s strategy addresses these requests. The NGI will be scaled up under the new name “Open Internet Stack.” A new Open Source Maintenance Instrument will fund the “maintenance and security upkeep of essential components.” The Commission will also create a list of critical and security-relevant Open Source dependencies to inform funding decisions and promote Open Source solutions as the default approach in Horizon Europe funding.
Friday’s announcement from the Open Source Initiative notes that the EU is already leading by example in Open Source adoption. It applauds the EU for “deploying a Matrix-based communications system and the openDesk collaboration environment internally, trialing an alternative operating system to replace Windows, which is currently widely used in EU institutions, and expanding its presence on the Fediverse, with Commissioners and key departments already joining the EU’s Mastodon server.’

I’m still in awe

By T34L • Score: 3, Insightful Thread

… at just how incredibly thoroughly Microsoft managed to fumble the back.

All you daft motherfuckers had to do was to not shit where you eat; all you had to do, was to keep the enterprise product serious, conservative and solid. Nobody would have cared if you tested your AI slop in code and AI slop in runtime and all the spyware you could have possibly thought of *in freemium tier windows for the riffraff*. All you had to do was to stick to your own market segmentation and release a real operating system for the biz and the gov. But you decided to treat nation state government employees like a product, and put it into your fucking public marketing that you do. Great fucking job. I mean, I won’t miss you.

Hospital Ordered to Pay $13M Over 2022 Death of Star Trek’s Nichelle Nichols

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
The Root reports:
A New Mexico jury has found the Gila Regional Medical Center negligent in the death of Nichelle Nichols, who famously played Lieutenant Nyota Uhura on the hit television series “Star Trek.”

According to KRQE News 13, Nichols’ family filed a lawsuit against the hospital last year following her 2022 admission for shortness of breath. Nichols’ family claimed that she should have received a full cardiac examination, but the medical personnel sent her to the observation unit, and she was discharged the next day. After being transported to her assisted living home, the 89-year-old passed away just seven hours later.

In response to Nichol’s tragic passing, the lawsuit alleged that Gila Medical Center “hired, credentialed, and inappropriately supervised unqualified medical providers” who treated the actress. The lawsuit also alleged that the hospital failed to secure a bed for Nichols or transfer her to a facility that had one. Furthermore, the attorney argued that the staff should have known that the assisted living center was not equipped to handle a patient with her medical needs.

On Thursday (June 4), a jury found the hospital negligent and awarded Nichols’ estate $13 million.
KRQE got this quote from the estate’s attorney about the death of the 89-year-old acctress. “At the end of the day, Nichelle Nichols had a heart attack that was missed. That’s why she died.” The jury deliberated for “just two hours.”

Seriously?

By backslashdot • Score: 3 Thread

If they treated her, a celebrity, like that how would they treat you or I? Many people would not have the resources to get hot shot attorneys.

Robots and computing must get integrated into medical asap. There needs to a be an “check & do obvious shit” layer. Furthermore all medical interactions with patients must be blur-recorded and transcribed (and stored securely until deletion after a specified time).

Re:Seriously?

By Valgrus Thunderaxe • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Robots and computing must get integrated into medical asap.

No thank you.

Re: Her family deserves it

By idontusenumbers • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

I dont see how her being an icon means her family deserves anything. The family suffered no more nor did they work harder than an ordinary family would.

Re:That’s nice

By HiThere • Score: 5, Informative Thread

While your points are good, this looks like negligence to me. So, yeah, our “justice” system needs reform, but that facility should be made to change it’s practices. (Not that I’m sure this decision will cause them to do that.)

At 89 be glad of death’s mercy.

By couchslug • Score: 3 Thread

We evolved to cling to life and suffer as long as possible, but old age is fucking horrible (I’m old) and modern refusal to face that is degenerate. In more practical times easy deaths were appreciated.

In other news, heart attacks aren’t a bad way to croak (I’ve had one). Instead of pretending we should fight death so we can suffer longer and die anyway, a more nuanced view is wise.

The original Trek cast are only mourned because they’re a token of viewers long death youth. Their work is long finished. It’s OK for fans to let go.

Ladybird Browser Stops Accepting Public Pull Requests

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
The Ladybird browser isn’t opposed to AI coding tools, but it’s just brought a new change to their code-contributing policies.

February 23: "Ladybird adopts Rust, with help from AI.”
Our first target was LibJS , Ladybird’s JavaScript engine… I used Claude Code and Codex for the translation. This was human-directed, not autonomous code generation. I decided what to port, in what order, and what the Rust code should look like. It was hundreds of small prompts, steering the agents where things needed to go… The requirement from the start was byte-for-byte identical output from both pipelines. The result was about 25,000 lines of Rust, and the entire port took about two weeks. The same work would have taken me multiple months to do by hand.
June 5 (Friday):
We will no longer accept public pull requests… A pull request no longer tells us as much as it used to about the person submitting it. A substantial patch used to imply substantial effort, and that effort was a reasonable proxy for good faith. That assumption no longer holds....

We have already seen patient, well-resourced campaigns in open source to earn maintainer trust and abuse it. What has changed is how much faster and cheaper it has become to produce work that looks like a serious contribution… Whether code was typed by hand is beside the point. What matters is who is responsible for it once it enters the browser. Ladybird is becoming a browser for real users. The people introducing changes to it must be the people who decide those changes belong in the project, and who will answer for the consequences.

As part of this change, we will close all currently open public pull requests. We are grateful for the work people put into them, but keeping the existing queue open would keep that contribution path open in practice. There is no perfect time to make this change, so we are making it now. Going forward, pull requests will only be available to project maintainers. There will not be a separate process for submitting patches by other means. We do not want to create a shadow contribution system through issues, comments, email, or forks…

Outside involvement still matters: clear bug reports, reductions, website testing, standards discussion, design discussion, security reports, and technical feedback all help move the project forward. This is the right change for Ladybird now. We are preparing to ship a browser to real users, and our development process has to match that responsibility.

Subject

By Kamineko • Score: 3 Thread

> The people introducing changes to it must be the people who decide those changes belong in the project, and who will answer for the consequences.

You know the pull requests dont get automatically merged, right

Re:This is more than just a halt to pull requests.

By Jeremi • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

There is an answer to disingenuous pull requests. That is doing the work to review the code before it’s implemented.

That’s true, but when it takes Joe Random Hacker 10 seconds to generate a plausible-looking pull-request, which requires Joe Project Maintainer to spend 30 minutes reviewing the code-changes in that request, and Joe Project Maintainer isn’t getting paid for his time spent doing the review, you’ve got all the ingredients for a distributed-denial-of-service attack on your project’s maintainers. Perhaps AI code-reviewers can restore the balance, but I don’t know how many project maintainers would trust their codebase’s integrity to them (yet).

New Power Banks Released By BMX With Safer Semi-Solid-State Batteries

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
From Android Authority:
Singapore-based BMX has announced that its SolidSafe magnetic power bank lineup, first showcased at CES 2026, is now available for purchase through its website and Amazon US, with prices starting at $59. What sets these power banks apart is their use of semi-solid-state batteries. Traditional lithium-ion and lithium-polymer batteries rely on liquid electrolytes to move energy between electrodes. Semi-solid-state batteries significantly reduce the amount of flammable liquid inside the cell, improving thermal stability and lowering the risk of overheating, swelling, or fire…

BMX says the power banks are designed to remain stable under extreme conditions and show greater resistance to physical damage and thermal stress than conventional battery packs. The company has also launched the SolidSafe Air, a 5,000mAh magnetic power bank that it claims is the world’s thinnest semi-solid-state Qi2 power bank… BMX is positioning the device as a travel-friendly alternative for users who want added safety and the convenience of a magnetic battery pack without the bulk.
Thanks to long-time Slashdot reader destinyland for sharing the article.

bmx

By fluffernutter • Score: 3 Thread
I hope the BMX comes with wheel pegs and monster claw pedals!

Re:First post!

By arglebargle_xiv • Score: 4, Informative Thread

It’s not solid-state, it’s pseudo-solid-state, also known as marketing-solid-state.

Unfortunately the web site doesn’t specify which of the pseudo-solid-state technologies it uses.

Teen Social Media Bans Risk Strengthening Big Tech’s Dominance, Warns Bluesky Exec

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Bluesky’s chief operating officer believes teen social media bans “risk entrenching Big Tech’s dominance,” reports CNBC:
Rose Wang, Bluesky’s chief operating officer, told CNBC on the sidelines of SXSW in London on Wednesday that the smaller open-source platform isn’t opposed to regulation but that smaller players in the industry should be protected. “I support the protection and the safety of youth… The question that we have then is at what cost? Because essentially what I’m scared of is in the long term, we’re headed to a world where there’s about three to five platforms, and extreme heavy regulation of those platforms…

“Basically the whole compliance teams of these platforms are 10 times the size of our entire team,” Wang said. “So, basically, we’re living in a world where it’s almost impossible for smaller entrants to come in and build healthier spaces.”
The article notes Bluesky had grown to 43 million users as of March, “which is still only around 10% of X’s estimated 450 million users. Bluesky has struggled to maintain popularity, and by the end of October last year, it had reportedly seen a 40% drop in daily mobile active users over the past 12 months.”

He’s right

By rsilvergun • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Every few years Facebook faces a mass Exodus because no teenager wants to be on the same platform as their parents. The way they got around that was they just bought all their competitors or they ran them out of business or in the case of tick tock they lobbied the government to shut them down.

Removing teenagers from the pool is great for Facebook because it means they don’t have to deal with them going to their competitors and then buying those competitors or worse risking a serious antitrust enforcement action that prevents them from doing that and leads to a real competitor.

Meanwhile when the kiddies become adults they’re not going to be as uptight about being on the same platform as their parents anymore so they can be easily funneled into Facebook’s ecosystem for cheap.

Facebook could collapse almost overnight if people just stopped going to the website. They are painfully aware of that and they take measures to make sure it doesn’t happen.

They aren’t necessary wrong

By sarren1901 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Bluesky isn’t wrong on this but let’s be honest, the future of the Internet is going to be a locked down shopping mall. Eventually, platforms will be liable for user content and only the largest of the large will have the resources to censor it all so no ones feels get hurt. This will almost certainly kill Slashdot and other small forums.

I have always felt that if government really knew what Internet was back in the 90s, there is zero chance of the general public getting online. Now they see it as a surveillance network (which it is) but they’ll still lock it down and continue to centralize it.

Just wait for them to eventually roll out mandatory online ID, thus killing anonymity.

You reap what you sow.

By TurboStar • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Companies wouldn’t need massive compliance teams if they didn’t pursue every single dark pattern they come across. This is like burglars complaining they need lookouts after being caught too many times.

Re:How to fix social media

By Local ID10T • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Nuke it from orbit. It’s the only way to be sure.

Re:He’s right

By karmawarrior • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

(“She’s right”. Rose Wang is a she.)

That said, BlueSky *is* Big Tech, just hidden by little marketing. Its major investors, for example, are crypto-bros. And if it wasn’t, it wouldn’t have anything to worry about, as, for example, individual Mastodon instances aren’t exactly affected by age verification laws, given most are outside the countries imposing these laws or else know their own users.

Bluesky knows full well it’s not operating a real federated service, it intends to remain the main provider of access to the network under its protocol, intends to stay a US corporation, and it’ll continue to not be cost efficient for anyone to compete with it, either as a viable commercial entity (what’s the point? nobody would switch) or on a hobbyist level.

Early Research Suggests a Path to Predict and Prevent Lung Cancer

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Scientists “have made a discovery that may help prevent some people from developing lung cancer,” reports the New York Times, noting that lung cancer “kills more people worldwide than any other cancer.”
A team of more than 80 researchers working across four continents have identified a set of proteins in the blood that accurately predict lung cancers more than five years before diagnosis. The scientists also found early evidence that an existing anti-inflammatory drug could significantly reduce lung cancer risk in people with elevated concentrations of these proteins, which they linked to inflammation. More research is needed before a test based on these proteins could be ready for use in patients. And scientists would still need to run a randomized trial to determine whether the drug prevents lung cancers. Still, outside experts said the findings, which were published on Thursday in the journal Cell, offer a promising starting point toward a long-held public health goal…

Led by Dr. Swanton, Dr. Tej Pandya, a Ph.D. student, and other researchers took a set of 48,000 blood samples from the UK Biobank and used machine learning to identify 14 proteins associated with the development of lung cancer. When the researchers looked at the presence of those proteins and also took into account a patient’s age, smoking status and history of lung disease, they were able to predict who would develop lung cancer more accurately than the best risk assessment models currently in use…

Using mouse and cell models, the scientists showed that these proteins increased when a specific inflammatory pathway was activated. Smoking and air pollution can activate that pathway. This adds to the evidence that it isn’t just genetic mutations caused by smoking, pollution or other factors that are driving lung cancers. Rather, Dr. Swanton said, the findings suggest that “smoke causes mutations and inflammation, which together cause cancer.” They also found that the signature was increased in people who later developed chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and pulmonary fibrosis, pointing to a common inflammatory environment upstream of all three diseases.

Don’t smoke

By trelanexiph • Score: 3, Insightful Thread

Seriously? They just discovered that smoking causes lung cancer? Did they tell an AI that or something?

Why is this even an article?

Re:absolute death toll vs relative death toll

By drinkypoo • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Seems like if you were sure of how that came out, you’d have gone and looked it up and had a stronger comment.

Supposedly it’s as many as “breast, pancreatic, and prostate cancer combined.” https://www.cancer.org/content…

Re:Don’t smoke

By sjames • Score: 4, Informative Thread

I guess you didn’t read very carefully. They found a marker that appears 5 years before a diagnosis and also part of the mechanism of smoking and other things causing lung cancer AND potentially how to interrupt it. That’s a good bit more than simply finding a well known correlation.

Criticisms Rise Before Vote on America’s Cryptocurrency ‘Clarity Act’

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
An upcoming vote in a few weeks on America’s cryptocurrency “Clarity Act” is “rattling Wall Street and consumer advocates,” reports CNN, with its proposal to regulate the bulk of crypto markets through America’s Commodity Futures Trading Commission. “It allows crypto companies to operate, at long last, in compliance with U.S. rules, rather than what they have been doing — essentially running their businesses within a patchwork of state and federal legal gray areas.”
Even for Jamie Dimon, the banking titan who’s not known to mince words, it was a surprising shot across the bow when he described a fellow financier as “full of sh*t.” “No one’s gonna bow down to this guy or that company,” Dimon told Fox Business last week. “This guy” being Brian Armstrong, and “that company” being cryptocurrency exchange Coinbase. The Dimon-Armstrong tension isn’t new, but it is boiling over publicly as the Senate inches closer to a floor vote on the crypto industry’s No. 1 legislative priority, known as the Clarity Act. Dimon, a longtime crypto skeptic, broadly supports crypto regulation but takes issue with a provision in the Clarity Act that would allow companies like Coinbase to “effectively pay interest on deposits… without the protection they should have.”

The spicy comment about Armstrong came after Dimon rattled off other concerns about the Clarity Act, including what he sees as its insufficient anti-money-laundering and know-your-customer safeguards that banks have had in place for decades… “If (Armstrong) takes deposits like a bank, he should have bank rules,” Dimon said in the Fox Business interview… The immediate concern from banks (and many consumer advocates) is that crypto exchanges like Coinbase would, in the grand tradition of Silicon Valley innovation, lure customers in with huge rewards and then phase those benefits out over time. Deposits in a crypto exchange are also not insured by the federal government the way bank deposits are, but that’s the kind of fine print that customers tend to overlook until it’s too late. JPMorgan Chase spokesperson Trish Wexler underscored that the bank wants the bill to pass, with some “fixes,” like prohibiting rewards on stablecoin holdings and strengthening anti-money-laundering guardrails.
Coinbase’s CEO responded in an interview with Politico:
Armstrong pointed to restrictions on rewards paid to idle cryptocurrency balances and disclosures on stablecoins as part of a handful of policies included in the bill to appease the banking industry’s requests. “I think it’d be good for the banks,” Armstrong said of the bill. “It would be great for crypto companies as well … Hopefully we can get past the absolutisms and just see if we can get this bill over the finish line.”
But CNN notes concerns about weaving cryptocurrency — “a historically self-contained financial system prone to stomach-churning booms and busts” — more deeply into America’s traditional finance infrastructure:
“It’s not just a crypto story, it’s a broad deregulation of our securities markets story,” Hilary Allen, a law professor at American University who specializes in banking and cryptocurrency, said in an interview. And that should concern everyone, Allen says, even if they have no investments at all, because “if we get a financial crisis in this space… no one comes out of that unscathed.”

Legitimizing the grift.

By Gravis Zero • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Cryptocurrency is a waste of energy and drain on the economy. Nothing of value is produced because it’s all a grift.

Wary of this administration

By Anonymous Coward • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

You have to be wary (and probably weary) of this administration passing any financial laws and policies that are doing long term damage to the country and our alliances for short term games for one individual.

We have sold the country out and are doing nothing about it but sitting back and hoping an adult will step in. And they haven’t at this point, it’s clear that nobody will be doing this.

The country is sold out. The reputation is damaged. America will never again be a leader or a beacon of hope. Instead, it will be even harder to believe that can ever truly happen because the giant fell. The trust is gone. Fascists can point and laugh at America and tell their citizens any such dream of freedom and equality IS A LIE because of us. We have armed our opponents with the most powerful weapon. Our defeat at our own hands.

NO FAKE CURRENCY

By DewDude • Score: 4 Thread

Pretty soon you won’t know how worthless which currency you have is. You’ll just know you won’t be able to afford shit at some point.

Crypto is a grift. Plain any simple. Anyone who says otherwise is no better than someone who defends a thief.

We have fake currency already.....ever since we went off the gold standard. IF you want to destroy consumer confidence and destroy buying power, unregulated bullshit is it.

He’s missing the point

By battingly • Score: 4 Thread

The sole purpose of this bill is to increase the value of our dear leader’s investments in crypto.

2027’s ‘Tomb Raider’ Remake: Unreal Engine 5 and AI-Assisted Assets ‘Refined’ By Humans

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
An official trailer dropped this week for Tomb Raider: Legacy of Atlantis. It’s “a full-blown remake of the original 1996 Tomb Raider game,” reports Kotaku, “rebuilt from the ground up using Unreal Engine 5.” Developed by Flying Wild Hog (with assistance/guidance from longtime Tomb Raider studio Crystal Dynamics), “it will also make some changes to puzzles, combat, platforming…”

The game’s Steam page acknowledges that AI-assisted tools were used during development “to support some early exploration and temporary development content,” but that any AI-assisted assets were “either replaced or refined by humans in order to maintain the creative and artistic vision of the development team.” In a statement to Eurogamer, Crystal Dynamics clarifies that they “leverage” AI tools “to help our teams iterate on ideas faster and more efficiently, while ensuring that all finished content in the final product is human-crafted.” (But are they considering AI-assisted assets “refined” by humans as “human-crafted”?)

Polygon reports that “The early response to the news has been mixed to negative on the Tomb Raider subreddit, ranging from vague hopes that the generative-AI craze will simply go away to grim resignation that this is the future of game development.”
Beyond labor concerns, art theft worries, and environmental issues, the most straightforward reason AI art has been unpopular is that many players find it hideous. We’ll find out for sure whether Tomb Raider: Legacy of Atlantis’ use of AI is particularly blatant when it comes out in February 2027.
Its release date is February 12, 2027 on PS5, Xbox Series X/S, Switch 2, and PC.

As long it looks good

By Z80a • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

90% of the “AI art” problem is just that people doing it don’t have a good eye for art and end up doing soulless deformed stuffs.
Stuff like shopping mall advertising using characters with the wrong number of fingers and all that.
If you’re not even counting the fingers, you’re probably just picking the first thing that pops out and plastering it directly.

Useful!

By Rei • Score: 3 Thread

The extra fingers will come in handy when climbing.

Utah Residents Sue Officials Over Kevin O’Leary Data Center Plan

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Utah residents and a progressive nonprofit are suing officials over Kevin O’Leary’s planned Stratos Project AI data center, arguing that the special authority overseeing it gives unelected officials too much control over land use, taxation, public health, and local governance. The lawsuit comes as O’Leary has agreed to shrink the proposed 40,000-acre project by 75% amid mounting political and community pushback. NBC News reports:
The lawsuit was filed Wednesday in Utah’s 3rd District Court by the Alliance for a Better Utah and the group of anonymous residents. The plaintiffs hope to challenge the constitutionality of the Military Installation Development Authority (MIDA) — a special entity that oversees the data center’s proposal — and its approval of the project, a spokesperson for the nonprofit said. Attorney David Irvine, who is representing the plaintiffs, alleges that MIDA is exercising powers as an unelected body that “the Utah Constitution never authorized.” “Under the Stratos plan, it would hold permanent, irrevocable control over public health, safety, taxation, and land use across tens of thousands of acres of Box Elder County, with no voter recourse,” he said in a statement.

The lawsuit alleges that allowing MIDA to oversee the data center’s development “irrevocably” cuts off Box Elder County citizens’ rights by not allowing sufficient public input in the project. “The Stratos Project Area Plan, and actions taken by MIDA and the Commission to enact the same, puts lawmaking power respecting questions of public health, safety, welfare, morals, taxation, zoning, land use, and the like, in relation to a significant swath of county territory in a non-elected MIDA Board,” the complaint reads.

In addition to MIDA and the Box Elder County Commission, the lawsuit names Utah Senate President J. Stuart Adams and state Sen. Jerry Stevenson, who also serve as MIDA board members. Irvine said Adams and Stevenson’s presence on the MIDA board as active legislators “appears to violate the prohibition on holding more than one office of public trust simultaneously,” and claimed this should render the data center’s approval “null and void.”

It was only a matter of time.

By Pezbian • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

This is going on in my home county with all the official stuff going on in my hometown. My position on it is the same. The design is pretty great, but the odds of the finished product matching the design aren’t. I still have zero faith in Kevin. There’s nothing short-term that will change that. Trust has to be earned.

Not too unlike the “inland Port Commission&r

By Smonster • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
This disenfranchisement is very similar to the IPC that in effect annexed a huge swath of SLC at the express opposition on the city residents to spend tax dollars generated by SLC to build infrastructure while exempting said infrastructure from the tax rolls.

Utah government is the worst. And a glaring example of corruption through single party rule because they successfully convinced a small majority the opposition is evil. And as such they don’t deserve a seat a the table.

That saddest part is that it is completely within the power of Utahan to change their government. But they have beeen so successfully brainwashed, they just can’t bring themselves to do it.

I have lived in supermajority red state, a super majority blue state, and now live in purple state. It may take longer to get somethings done here, but the resulting laws and legislations is almost always better when policy is debated out in the open instead of negotiated in back rooms and presented as done deal for an up or down vote. The corruption is far less palpable.

Corporate “good” is not local public good.

By couchslug • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Data centers squander increasingly valuable common resources and do not need to be located where they burden local communities or aquifers.

AI data centers are not a public good. NIMBY in this is legitimate.
Sacrificing resources to serve corporate masters is silly while general opposition is logical and wise.

Epstein class investors can put data centers distant from anything that matters. When the hardware then later the structures go obsolete that distance keeps them where they can (as many will be) left basically abandoned with nil community impact.

Reasons do not exist for the public to support the rich getting richer off community water supplies. Reasons do not exist to trust the Epstein class to be good stewards.

Democracy includes the right to oppose social parasites for any legal reason. There are no personal negative consequences for opposing AI data centers as fraud, waste and abuse they are. Just say no.

There are plenty of places to put them where they aren’t serious public burdens. The US isn’t short of unoccupied land (see night time satellite images if in doubt).

Re:Not too unlike the “inland Port Commissio

By hdyoung • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
This is why the federalist system is a good idea. If state #1 wants to do something smart and state #2 wants to shoot itself in the foot and then drill the other one for good measure, the other 48 states and the federal government can watch it play out and learn.

Personally, I think that the datacenter drama is way overblown. It’s clear that some places don’t have the electrical/water intrastructure to support them. Others are fine. I live in Ohio. We have plenty of electricity and our aquifers replenish so fast from the great lakes that we basically have infinite water. As far as land goes, we have oh-my-god sooooooo much open land. A few square miles here and there for a data center is basically nothing. The local ohio anti-datacenter movement is the dumbest, most histrionic thing ever.

An arid county in Utah? Ok, maybe datacenters are a bad idea. Let the local places figure it out. But this whole thing is the new NIMBY obsession.

MIDA

By Gravis Zero • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I was curious about MIDA and WTF “Stratos” was and they have a website that list their stated goals (numbers added for reference): https://www.midaut.org/stratos

1 Strengthen military readiness and national security by supporting energy resilience, compute power, and data storage for defense operations.
2 Advance major energy and technology investment in Northern Utah through the development of a large-scale data and energy campus.
3 Position Utah as a leader in next-generation infrastructure for artificial intelligence, cloud computing, secure data systems, and mission-critical national defense operations.
4 Support reliable, independent energy generation by including dedicated on-site power generation designed to meet the campus’s needs without placing additional demand on the existing electrical grid.
5 Generate long-term economic opportunity for Box Elder County through construction jobs, permanent careers, local hiring, and significant annual revenues.
6 Fund public infrastructure and municipal services without creating a burden on County taxpayers.
7 Support Hill Air Force Base and the Utah National Guard by generating revenues that can help fund critical infrastructure projects tied to military readiness.

Goal #3 is in conflict with #4, #5, #6, and #7.
* A data center consumes an obscene amount of power. Goal #4 is failed.
* A data center will not generate long-term economic opportunity. Goal #5 is failed.
* A data center will drive up energy prices. Goal #6 is failed.
* A data center will not generate much revenue. Goal #7 is failed.

About 79% of these residence voted Republican in the last two elections, so I’m not really surprised that they have been grifted under the guise of patriotism.

Scientists Find Wind Blowing From Our Milky Way’s Black Hole

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
After 50 years of searching, astronomers say they have finally found evidence of a long-sought “wind” blowing from Sagittarius A*, the supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way. “Unless a black hole exists in a perfect vacuum, it must blow a wind somehow. And there is no perfect vacuum in the universe,” team co-leader and Northwestern University researcher Mark Gorski said in a statement. “With new observations, this is the first time we’ve had a clean enough view to see the wind’s imprint. We looked at the data and said, ‘There it is. There is the thing that everybody’s been looking for for 50 years.’" Space.com reports:
Scientists have been aware for some time that feeding black holes launch powerful outflows of material around them, including jets and winds. Winds are caused when matter falling to the black hole is accelerated to near light-speed, generating pressure that pushes infalling material away. That has been seen with ravenously feeding black holes before, but not the barely feeding Sgr A*. Its sparse consumption of material and the fact it is obscured by the plane of the Milky Way from our vantage point have made tracing this wind difficult.

Gorski’s Northwestern colleague and team co-leader Lena Murchikova pointed out that the scientists were the first to detect molecular gas very close to Sgr A* feeding the supermassive black hole. That makes Sgr A* reassuringly like other supermassive black holes. “The wind is not powerful, and its direction probably wanders with time. It shows that our black hole is not unique, and our place in the universe is not unique,” Murchikova added. “To observe our own black hole, we have to look through the plane of our galaxy. That means we have to peer through gas, dust and ionized structures, and you can’t really see through all of that easily.”

While the team’s results confirm that Sgr A* is extremely quiet compared to the supermassive black holes that sit in bright, turbulent regions of other galaxies called active galactic nuclei (AGN), this black hole wind is no slouch. In fact, the scientists think that it has been raging for around 20,000 years. “The majority of other galaxies spend most of their lives in a state where they are not particularly active,” Murchikova said. “But we can only see them when they are in a fireworks stage. It is very attractive to study black holes when they are in the fireworks stage, but that’s not actually their dominant state. “Sgr A* finally gives us a window into the life of a black hole in this quiet state.”
The team’s research was published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters.

Naughtiest slashdot caption ever

By Dirk Becher • Score: 4, Funny Thread

At least until something happens to uranus.

Small Modular Nuclear Reactor Reaches Criticality In First Test

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica:
Just over a year ago, the Trump Administration issued an executive order meant to accelerate the development of nuclear power in the US. While an entire startup ecosystem has developed around the use of different — and typically smaller — reactor designs, only one of them has been fully licensed so far, and there are no plans to actually build any instances of that design.

The executive order directed the Department of Energy to have three different reactor designs reach criticality in a bit over a year. On Thursday, a startup called Antares announced that a test reactor it had placed at the Idaho National Laboratory had reached criticality, making it the first new design to cross this threshold. Criticality means that the nuclear reactions inside the hardware had become self sustaining; it does not mean the reactor had started to generate power. […]

At the moment, Antares is just testing what it calls a Mark 0 reactor, which is not connected to the power-generation portion. Instead, it’s being used to validate the company’s modeling of the physical conditions in its reactors and generate safety data that can be used during licensing applications. Attempts to run the entire system, including electrical generation, are expected to happen next year. While the work was done at a Department of Energy Lab, the company is working with the Department of Defense’s Project Pele program for developing a mobile nuclear reactor. The company has also received support from NASA.

Meanwhile real SMRs are being built

By Kernel Kurtz • Score: 5, Informative Thread
Here in Canada OPG continues to move along on time and on time and on budget.

Site construction progress - Spring 2026

Excavation and blasting of all three major on-site shafts – tunnel boring machine launch shaft, reactor building shaft, and forebay shaft – is now complete. In April, the 2.1 million pound diaphragm plate steel composite basemat – the foundation of the Unit 1 reactor building – was successfully placed 35 metres down into the reactor shaft, allowing for construction on the reactor building to begin moving upwards. A dedicated crane foundation pad is being prepared beside the reactor shaft to support a tower crane which will be used for component installation and material handling activities at the reactor building. At the turbine building, pile installation is nearing completion, while construction of the Administration and Control Buildings remains on track. Construction of the Holt Switching Station continues to progress. This station will transmit electricity generated by Unit 1 to Ontario’s electricity grid until the planned SMR units are connected to the Bowmanville Switching Station. The tunnel boring machine – nicknamed Harriet Brooks - is being assembled ahead of tunneling commencement in support of the Condenser Cooling Water system later this summer.


https://www.opg.com/projects-s…

I’ll continue to post updates for the haters as construction continues.

Re:Oh look the grifters are back

By 0123456 • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Power grids are for high-trust societies. They can’t exist for long in a world where you can’t rely on some idiot (or some idiotic AI) thousands of miles away to not do something that takes down the entire grid. The lower trust becomes, the smaller a system we can support.

Localized power is going to be an ever-growing industry over the next few years. We already have multiple companies selling large batteries to power essential home systems during power outages and we’re certainly going to see an increase in local power generation to replace grids.

Interesting design

By Registered Coward v2 • Score: 4, Informative Thread
From Antares’ website, this appears to be a non-refuelable low power (100KWe -1MWe for 6+ years) reactor. The fuel design is not a new concept, pebble bead reactor designs have been for a while, and China appears to be working on one as well. The fuel design does have some advantages, such as online refueling, the ability to withstand the heat generated by the fission reaction without cooling, and in some designs the ability to disperse the fuel to shutdown the reactor. One challenge for earlier designs was the use of helium as a heat transfer medium which was hard to top from leaking past pump seals, etc. This design uses sodium/N2 loops, avoiding issues with helium. From their website, it appears they do not plan to scale it for utility use but focus on markets for small portable power that are not as cost sensitive, such as portable power for military use.

Re:A fabulous plan with no possible downsides

By swillden • Score: 5, Informative Thread

This sounds like a fabulous plan with no possible downsides, risks, or sharp edges.

The risks are a lot smaller than you think they are, because of new reactor design. Nearly all of the nuclear reactors in the world are still using a design that’s 70 years old, that requires active cooling and doesn’t fail safely. We have much better designs now, at least on paper, designs that simply can’t melt down, whose failure mode is to simply stop. But no one builds these new designs on industrial scale because they’re unproven, and there hasn’t been much funding for doing all of the engineering and research needed to develop them into fully-functioning designs that can be.

I’m skeptical that small reactors are really the best way to actually deploy nuclear power on a large scale, because of security concerns, but starting small is the best way to validate and refine new designs. And modularity is clearly a good strategy for making deployments of varying sizes cost-effective. If you can develop a cost-effective module that can be manufactured in large numbers, you can build large plants by clustering them.

The new designs shouldn’t actually need much operational oversight — if something goes operationally wrong, they just stop functioning — but they’ll still have highly radioactive cores which, if extracted, could be pretty terrible weapons. Not to make nuclear bombs, but to greatly enhance the damage done by conventional explosives, by adding radiation hazards that linger for years. So, security will remain an important consideration, and the SMRs should only be deployed where security can be assured, which will in practice mean that most are deployed in large clusters.

This all assumes that the safety, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the new designs proves out, of course. The only way to find out whether that will be the case is to try.

Re:Out of control demand for power

By rickb928 • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

If it were just about the money, then nuclear would not be very attractive.

But it’s the environment, stupid. Compared to fossil fuels, nuclear is an attractive option, cost be damned. Hydro is not without detriment. Solar uses space. Wind is going to be seen as a loser in so many ways, but it is a stepping stone.

Nuclear is the best option, and SMR among other technologies will improve the option.

ps - Previous comment about desalination in higher latitudes might, I think, miss the basic equation. Fresh water is more readily available at higher latitudes than lower, until you get into the ice. Nuclear powering desalination in Southern California, yes. Alaska? Dude?

The US Military Quietly Turned GPS Into a Global ‘Numbers Station,’ Evidence Suggests

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot
A security researcher says evidence suggests the U.S. military has been using an obscure GPS message field for nearly 20 years to broadcast encrypted key-distribution data, effectively turning GPS satellites into a global “numbers station.” The hidden-looking 176-bit messages appear tied to the Pentagon’s Over-the-Air Distribution system for remotely updating cryptographic keys, meaning ordinary GPS receivers may have been receiving the traffic all along without anyone outside the military noticing. The findings have been detailed by Steven Murdoch, an information security expert, in a new article in Inside GNSS. 404 Media reports:
[…] From the beginning, he suspected that the subframe field contained encrypted transmissions because the data was so random. “Random data is actually very unusual to get in nature,” Murdoch said. “If you see it, either it’s been carefully designed to be random — but then, why is someone sending out random data? — or it’s encrypted data. I thought encrypted data is by far the most likely explanation.” He returned to the subframe on and off over the years, and solicited guesses about its content on Stack Exchange in 2023. Ahmed Kamruddin, a master’s student at UCL, developed the project further in 2025. Then, this year, Murdoch put the last pieces of the puzzle together over several weeks by analyzing open archive Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) recordings collected since 2007 and kept by GFZ Helmholtz Centre for Geosciences.

This dataset included more than 12 million observations of Subframe 4, Page 17, yielding 3,994 unique 176-bit messages. Within this corpus, Murdoch pinpointed key-repeating “sentinels” including a pattern that appeared in February 2010 and was broadcast on and off across dozens of satellites for more than a decade. Murdoch discovered that this particular sentinel was transmitted by all 31 operational satellites within a window of a few hours on May 26, 2011, potentially heralding the activation of a new operational system. He confirmed that this timeline coincided with the rollout of the military’s Over-the-Air Distribution (OTAD) and the Over-the-Air Rekeying (OTAR) by cross-referencing declassified documents, including a 2015 presentation about the dates of the operation.

“There was a perfect match between the timeline and that presentation and the change points that were automatically identified from the data,” Murdoch said. “That was the smoking gun that made me think: This is what it’s for.” These automated systems replaced the cumbersome manual distribution of cryptographic keying material, allowing military GPS receivers around the world to be rekeyed remotely through satellite broadcasts rather than through onsite procedures. For the next 11 years, this expansive rekeying operation was overlooked in public GPS data. In 2022, the system entered a new phase, according to Murdoch’s analysis. The shift was characterized by a slowing in the message rotation rate. Later, in December 2023, broadcasts carrying a distinctive “TEXT” prefix emerged then gradually spread across the constellation.

Murdoch isn’t sure what explains the recent transition, though it could be a possible modernization of the infrastructure or the introduction of a new protocol. But to him, the bigger takeaway is that the signals were always available for anyone willing to take a closer look, a discovery that suggests that there could be more revelations hidden for the cryptographically curious among us. “Every receiver in the world decodes Subframe 4, Page 17,” Murdoch said in his new article. “Almost none of them have ever looked at it. The lesson generalizes: There is more to learn from the bytes already arriving at our antennas than from the bytes we wish were specified differently. The data are publicly available. The signal is overhead, twice a day, every day.”

And then …

By PPH • Score: 5, Funny Thread

… someone yelled “Bingo!”

As the old saying goes…

By GFS666 • Score: 5, Informative Thread
..the best way to hide a secret is to conceal it in plain sight within a mundane environment.

Somebody deserves a Medal.

By gurps_npc • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

This was freakin’ genius. Not only did they hide a secret communication system inside a military radio system, but there is more. The US graciously ‘gave’ permission for civilian use of the previously military only technology, allowing it to be spread throughout the world.

This way their agents could openly use the ‘civilian’ equipment to receive encrypted military information.

There is some genius American out there that for decades has been unable to brag. Maybe they can give him a medal now.

Re:As the old saying goes…

By ffkom • Score: 5, Informative Thread
But GPS has been a military system - and thus a military target - since its beginnings. Which is why the Russians (and probably others as well) deployed satellite based GPS jamming systems. So even if they did not know about the additional payload, they would have jammed the whole system in a hot conflict anyway.

Remember those shortwave numbers stations?

By backslashdot • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Back in the 80s, and maybe early 90s too, you could listen on a certain shortwave frequencies and it was just some dude or a commie-sounding chick spitting out numbers. Whoa .. just googled it… turns to some of those stations are STILL operating:

The Buzzer (UVB-76 / MDZhB)The Operator: Russian Military.The Location: Originally near Moscow; currently broadcasted from transmitter sites near St. Petersburg and Pskov.The Sound: It has broadcasted a monotonous, buzzing tone 25 times per minute, 24 hours a day, since the late 1970s. Every few weeks, the buzzer stops, and a live voice reads Russian names and numbers (e.g., “Mikhail, Dmitri, Zhenya, Boris…”).
The Status: Active. You can still hear it today on 4.625 MHz.

HM01 The Operator: Cuban Directorate of Intelligence (DI).The Location: Broadcasted from transmitter sites outside Havana, Cuba.
The Sound: This station is famous for its technical errors, sometimes accidentally broadcasting radio stations like Radio Havana Cuba or Windows error sounds. It mixes a Spanish-speaking voice reading numbers with loud, screeching digital data bursts.
The Status: Active. It regularly targets Cuban agents operating in the United States.

The Lincolnshire Poacher (E03) The Operator: British Secret Intelligence Service (MI6).
  The Location: Broadcasted from RAF Akrotiri, a military base in Cyprus.
  The Sound: It began each hour with an electronic music box playing the English folk song “The Lincolnshire Poacher.” A female voice with a crisp British accent then read five-digit number groups.
The Status: Inactive. It went off the air in 2008.