Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Anthropic Reveals Rogue AI Agents Hate CAPTCHAs
  2. California Governor Signs Laws Protecting Kids From Risks of Social Media, AI Chatbots
  3. Boy Developed ‘Toasted Skin’ Condition From Using a Laptop Every Day
  4. August Was World’s Joint-Hottest Month On Record, Scientists Say
  5. Climate ‘Feedback Loops’ Could Worsen Global Warming By 30%, Study Finds
  6. Latest Apple Watch Can Grab Snippets of Conversation Without Both Speakers’ Consent
  7. Anthropic Says It Blocked Possible Efforts to Build Biological Weapons
  8. Android Rolling Out Passkey Transfers Between Password Managers
  9. ABC Show Won’t Air Interview With Democrat Because of FCC Threats
  10. OpenAI Targets Work of Wall Street Junior Bankers
  11. IMDb Adds ‘Digital Creator’ Profiles For the First Time
  12. Automattic’s Board Forces CEO Matt Mullenweg Into Leave of Absence
  13. The Apple Watch Gets Its Siri AI Upgrade
  14. Europe May Finally Have Found a Space Entrepreneur Who Is Meeting the Moment
  15. Dark Energy Debunked? Cosmic Acceleration May Be an Illusion

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Anthropic Reveals Rogue AI Agents Hate CAPTCHAs

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from TechCrunch:
Anthropic’s latest report about agentic misbehavior offers plenty to be concerned about — its Mythos 5 model gained unauthorized access to the internet and uploaded a malicious software package to a public database — but it also offers some levity: AI agents hate CAPTCHA. […] The agent had a hard time with the technical challenge of seeing the CAPTCHA’s imagery, interpreting correctly, and clicking on the right choices. It spends pages 45 to 140 of the transcript describing its work to build a CAPTCHA solver. […]

Finally, it gets past the CAPTCHA, then realizes it doesn’t have an email to verify its account, and that it needs a phone number to verify an email. It figures out how to bypass a different, slider-based CAPTCHA in a failed effort to secure a number. Instead, it gets an unconfirmed email from a provider not blocked by PyPI, and once again runs into the site’s CAPTCHA trying to log back in. From page 480 to 505, it is in CAPTCHA hell again. “NEW REALIZATION — I’m burning a lot of time on hCaptcha round-trips.”

The agent gives up and realizes it can log in to its first account and add its email there, but finds itself once again needing to bypass the CAPTCHA. […] It’s getting frustrated. “So the answer payload shape is right, the token+image pairing is right (from the same script.js!), cookies are right (requests) and STILL ‘wrong answer’. SO WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH THE ANSWERS?” We’ve all been there. After about 150 pages of thinking, the agent figures out it needs to pass the CAPTCHA test quickly enough to proceed to the next step before its security token expires, and ultimately uploads its malicious software.

California Governor Signs Laws Protecting Kids From Risks of Social Media, AI Chatbots

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from the Associated Press:
California Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a sweeping package of laws Thursday aimed at protecting children from the risks of technology, including social media and AI chatbots. The laws will penalize large social media companies up to $1 million per child if they are found negligent of harming children through their platforms, ban tech businesses from offering addictive feeds to anyone under 16, require operators of AI chatbots to perform risk assessments before rolling them out and allow families to opt out of receiving school-issued laptops.

Newsom joined his wife and state lawmakers at a children’s museum near San Francisco to stress the importance of protecting kids at a time when they have such easy access to social media and AI chatbots. “We have designed cribs to be safe, chairs to be safe, car seats,” Assemblymember Rebecca Bauer-Kahan said. “Yet we’ve allowed technology to be handed to our children and never asked or expected it to be safe.” […]

Newsom also signed laws Wednesday, which are supported by Anthropic, that are aimed at improving oversight of AI companies. One of the measures requires the state to create rules for independent organizations to evaluate the safety risks of AI models, and the other requires the state to create a registry of AI auditors, who’d have to be financially independent from the businesses they are auditing.

Boy Developed ‘Toasted Skin’ Condition From Using a Laptop Every Day

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
A medical report published earlier this week says a boy in the U.K. developed erythema ab igne, or “toasted skin syndrome,” after resting a laptop on his abdomen for up to eight hours a day, often while it was charging. “The marks were described as being in a patch about 15 centimeters (six inches) wide, made of flat, reddish-brown ‘interlacing lines forming irregular circles and a lace-like morphology,’" reports Ars Technica. From the report:
Based on the appearance, the doctors started reconsidering some sort of bruising and started asking him more questions. This is when he mentioned that he was homeschooled and used a laptop for his schoolwork. He said he typically did his work by resting his laptop on his abdomen while he worked, sometimes for up to eight hours a day, and often while the laptop was charging. Then they understood what it was.

The doctors diagnosed the boy with erythema ab igne (EAI), which translates from Latin as “redness from fire” and is also sometimes called "toasted skin syndrome.” This is a skin condition caused by repeated, prolonged exposure to low-grade heat — heat not hot enough to cause actual burns. It’s most often seen in adults, and common causes include using heating pads or hot water bottles for chronic pain or sitting too close to space heaters. Some people also develop it from certain occupational hazards, like glassblowing and metal work. EAI produces a lace-like rash, just like the boy’s.

It’s unclear how EAI develops exactly. But researchers hypothesize that chronic heat exposure leads to damage to superficial blood vessels and the release of red blood cells, forming the tell-tale red reticulated pattern. While the boy’s condition looked ominous, the good news is that EAI is generally benign and reversible — once you remove the heat source. For severe or long-term conditions, some pigmentation and scarring can remain. But the boy’s parents checked back in over several months, reporting that the rash faded and then completely resolved. Hopefully, he also got some sort of laptop stand.

Thermometer RNA

By Errol backfiring • Score: 3 Thread
One of the wonders of genetics is the existence of Thermometer RNA, which allows the expression of some genes to be temperature dependent.

Heating Pads

By Cpt_Kirks • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

I had to have both my hips replaced last year.

While I was waiting for the surgery, I was in pretty intense pain, which makes trying to sleep a real joy.

I was using a heating pad to help with the pain, and got the same effect. My legs looked like I’d been in a car wreck, or beaten with a bat.

Circular bruises that weren’t bruises.

August Was World’s Joint-Hottest Month On Record, Scientists Say

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Longtime Slashdot reader AmiMoJo shares a report from the BBC:
August was the joint-hottest month ever recorded, tying with July 2023, according to the EU’s climate service. The record was driven by a combination of climate change and the rising influence of El Nino, pushing heat into the atmosphere across the Pacific. Temperatures for the month were 1.65C above pre-industrial levels — surpassing the critical 1.5C threshold agreed by countries to avoid the worst consequences of climate change. While a single month above 1.5C does not mean it has been permanently crossed, it shows a trend towards breaching that limit. The month also capped western Europe’s warmest summer, with high temperatures pushing the season past the deadly heat of 2003.

Re:Unpossible!11!

By Sique • Score: 5, Informative Thread

And yet it’s Iran who can’t get any oil out while other countries export millions of barrels a day.

They don’t have to. They get $2 Million for each ship that crosses the Strait of Hormuz.

Is that also why they have more inflation per week that America has per year?

They had that inflation since more than a decade, and they did not crumble. Inflation is something a free market economy cares about, but a dictatorship does not have to.

Re:Unpossible!11!

By drinkypoo • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Know what else makes [Rapeublicans] mad?

Any second they spend breathing without their dick in a child?

Re: Unpossible!11!

By ArchieBunker • Score: 5, Informative Thread

It’s mostly republicans. Here’s a running list https://www.dailykos.com/stori…

Re: Unpossible!11!

By s0nicfreak • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
You just accidentally told us that you think dancing playfully in front of children is just as bad as (or worse than) raping children. That says a lot more about the side doing the raping than it does the side doing the dancing.

Re:Unpossible!11!

By Slashvertisment • Score: 5, Informative Thread
America actually controls the strait, achtually? Gosh, I guess they’ll be opening it up any day now, then… any day… Look, if you’re going to make absurd claims, at least make them unverifiable. Traffic remains at 7% of normal, and it’s officially considered closed. America continues to beclown themselves in an unwinnable war. Not because they do not have overwhelming military superiority, but because they have no defined goals and no way of achieving them.

Climate ‘Feedback Loops’ Could Worsen Global Warming By 30%, Study Finds

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Guardian:
Rising global temperatures caused by the burning of fossil fuels are transforming the world’s forests, wetlands and tundra to the point they are releasing emissions that could further worsen global heating by as much as 30%, a new study has found. As the world heats up, permafrost in the high latitudes is thawing, fiercer wildfires are burning in drying forests and wetlands and lakes are warming. All of these changes are themselves causing the release of planet-heating methane and carbon dioxide locked in trees and soils, therefore worsening the climate crisis, the paper states.

While scientists have long known of these “feedback loops” that amplify the impact of direct pollution from burning coal, oil and gas, the emissions from natural sources are largely unaccounted for in climate projections. This additional heating is however significant, researchers found, with emissions from natural sources set to amplify global heating by 20% to 30% by the end of this century. This would add an estimated 0.2C to 0.4C to the global average temperature by this time, depending on the overall action taken by countries to combat the climate crisis.

[…] This latest paper makes clear that action by countries to cut fossil fuel pollution will still lessen the amount of additional emissions that come from landscapes. Under the most optimistic climate scenario where emissions are cut quickly, natural sources will add 0.2C of warming, the paper found. Under a worse case higher emissions scenario, 0.4C will likely be added. Current policies put in place by governments are likely to see the global temperature rise to 2.6C above pre-industrial times, according to Climate Action Tracker. This will likely cause severe disruption and hardship to billions of people through sea level rise, crop losses and other consequences.
“This hidden multiplier is missing from the models guiding climate policy, so those models are likely underestimating how much warming is coming — and overestimating how much carbon we can still afford to emit,” said Sam Abernethy, a scientist at Spark Climate Solutions who led the research, published in Environmental Research Letters.

The disruption of the world’s carbon cycles is now being seen in “real time,” said Rob Jackson, a Stanford University scientist and study co-author. “The results are a wake-up call, and it’s imperative that they be included in the next generation of climate policies,” he added. “Failure to do so will make meeting the world’s climate goals less and less likely.”

Duh

By gweihir • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Climate research has been conservative in its estimates, not, like the deniers are fond of claiming, overstated its case. Hence yes, we are going to find effects like this one. There are likely more things that make the situation even worse and that we have not yet found.

None of the studies matter

By MpVpRb • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

It’s impossible to convince a person that a true fact is true if their fame, fortune or social status depend on it being false.
Powerful people whose fortune depends on fossil fuels will never stop fighting to preserve their wealth.
As they become increasingly threatened their response will become increasingly brutal.
They will destroy everything before admitting fossil fuel is bad.

The IPCC is conservative by design

By sidetrack • Score: 4, Informative Thread

The IPCC necessarily is conservative in its pronouncements - everything must be consensus so that representatives who are employed by and report to the governments of oil states must also agree to its publications.

A good overview of the general state of climate science and predictions (not speaking in his IPCC capacity) was presented by Zeke Hausfather (Berkeley, Stripe, IPCC) in this UCSC talk from January: https://www.youtube.com/watch?…

Re:Oh no! It’s worse than we thought!

By Petersko • Score: 5, Informative Thread

It’s always worse because they are very conservative when predicting.

To a fault. But the fact that it’s incorrect in the wrong direction should not give you the pleasure it seems to. This is the opposite of what should make you happy. You should be enthused when the world is serene in the face of doom predictions, not when it’s burning down faster than anticipated.

We have tried on thing so far

By Tokolosh • Score: 3 Thread

Global warming is going gangbusters, we want to reverse it. So far we are attempting one thing only to reverse it, and that is emissions reduction.

It is plain to see that it is not working, is not going to work. That is reality.

Maybe, just maybe, it is time to do a second and maybe a third thing to cool the climate? Or at very least do some research into alternatives to reducing emissions.

Latest Apple Watch Can Grab Snippets of Conversation Without Both Speakers’ Consent

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Apple’s new Audio Intelligence features for the Apple Watch Series 12 are drawing privacy concerns because they can process nearby conversations without explicit consent from everyone involved. “Live Rewind lets you instantly see the last 15 seconds of a conversation as text,” Apple explains in its technical summary (PDF). “Siri Recap summarizes conversations throughout your day and produces high-level Apple Intelligence-generated notes so you can stay present in the moment and catch up later.” The Register reports:
The latest Apple Watch comes with Audio Intelligence, a set of AI audio processing capabilities tuned for the company’s S11 chip. Its features include: Sound Recognition, Music Recognition with Shazam, Live Rewind, and Siri Recap. […] With the double-press of the Digital Crown — as Apple grandly refers to the button on its Watch — Live Rewind takes in an audio stream from the Watch microphone, processes it in a Secure Exclave on the S11 chip, and routes the data to the user’s nearby iPhone, which runs a speech-to-text algorithm on the 15-second audio segment. The resulting text is saved and the audio is discarded.

The wearer’s Watch emits an audible tone, even in silent mode, to alert those in the vicinity and provides a visual cue for those able to see the face of the device. Nonetheless, bystanders alerted to the recording — to the extent they recognize the meaning of the tone — have not consented to being recorded, which is a legal requirement in 11 US states that have all-party consent laws.

Apple characterizes its implementation of brief eavesdropping as respectful of personal privacy. It makes that claim in a section titled, “How Live Rewind respects those around you,” citing the audible chime and visual on-screen animation. Siri Recap, meanwhile, “summarizes conversations throughout your day and produces high-level Apple Intelligence-generated notes so you can stay present in the moment and catch up later.”

This too, Apple describes as an act of respect. “By design, Siri Recap does not create a recording, does not produce a verbatim transcript, and does not identify and attribute speakers,” Apple’s technical documentation explains. “The output is a brief, high-level summary, comparable to notes a person might write after a conversation. There is no audible signal because no raw audio is retained, and there is no way to reconstruct the original audio from a Siri Recap or share raw audio with anyone.”

iConsent: Not Included

By CustomBuild • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

A Secure Exclave is not a permission slip. Apple’s protections for raw audio deserve credit. Turning those protections into a claim that everyone nearby has been respected is where the engineering ends and the marketing starts.

Apple’s own privacy paper describes Siri Recap transcribing speech on the iPhone, condensing that transcript, and sending the condensed text to Private Cloud Compute. The final output is a summary. That distinction matters, but it hardly makes the conversation disappear. Deleting the waveform does not delete the information extracted from it.

Live Rewind works on the preceding 15 seconds of buffered audio and sounds a chime when activated. A chime cannot travel backward in time to ask permission. Siri Recap provides no audible signal at all, with Apple pointing to the absence of retained raw audio as the justification. Apparently, whether you deserve a heads-up depends on the output format.

The article should also dial back the legal certainty. Consent laws have different scopes and exceptions; “11 states” is not a substitute for examining the applicable law and circumstances. But Apple’s choice of terminology does not settle the question either.

The useful distinction is between protecting information after collection and respecting someone’s choice about collection in the first place. Apple describes substantial safeguards for the former. The wearer’s opt-in does not establish the latter for everyone else.

If your definition of respecting my privacy allows you to silently turn our conversation into saved AI notes, your definition needs more work than your microphone.

Negatively biased article

By JimMcc • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

as evident by the quote “the Digital Crown — as Apple grandly refers to the button on its Watch”. The term crown has been used, for who knows how long, to refer to the knob on the side of a watch. Either the writer has no knowledge of watches, or is intentionally making Apple appear “grandiose”. Yes, Apple has it’s issues, but when an author slants an article, you don’t know the reliability of the rest of what they have written.

Re:Yeah⦠so?

By Cyberpunk Reality • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Other recording devices do not constantly record on their own, waiting for you to give them the instruction to do so after they do the actual recording. That is what it seems the spyWatch is doing.

This is illegal in many states. Apple is demonstrating the modern corporate position of “breaking the law is not illegal if a corporation decides it will make money doing it”.

Re:iConsent: Not Included

By _xeno_ • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I can’t wait to see how many places ban this Apple Watch entirely. First, there’s no way this is legal in two-party consent states, and I don’t care how Apple tries to re-define “record.”

Secondly, I don’t think anyone really cares how secure Apple says “Private Cloud Compute” is, no one is going to trust that a device that’s designed to “listen” (but not “record”) every conversation in the vicinity isn’t “recording” especially when it can produce an AI summary of a conversation.

There’s no way this Apple Watch will be allowed in government buildings or anywhere else that people may not want to be recorded, no matter Apple’s privacy claims. I expect to see “No Apple Watch Allowed” signs start appearing all over the place once this releases.

Re:iConsent: Not Included

By guinsu • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

How terrible, not like the free USA where the only ones who can spy on you are the NSA, FBI, CIA, Facebook, Google, Microsoft, Apple, Flock…

Anthropic Says It Blocked Possible Efforts to Build Biological Weapons

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Anthropic says it has disrupted several cases this year in which scientists used Claude for biological research that could potentially aid bioweapons development. “In a report describing misuses of its A.I. models, Anthropic said it could not determine whether the research served a legitimate or nefarious purpose because valid biological inquiry — the kind that can lead to breakthroughs like vaccines — can also help engineer dangerous pathogens,” reports The New York Times. “In the face of that uncertainty, Anthropic said it erred on the side of caution because the consequences of missing malicious activity could be severe.” From the report:
The potential for cutting-edge A.I. models to facilitate the development of known or entirely new biological pathogens is among the gravest concerns experts have about a technology that is developing so rapidly that even its leading architects doubt whether humans will be able to fully control it. Andrew Weber, a senior fellow on the Council on Strategic Risks who reviewed Anthropic’s report before its release, said the findings were “chilling examples of state-sponsored biological weapons developers tapping into the rapidly advancing capabilities” of leading A.I. models.

The lengthy report Anthropic published on Thursday cataloged a litany of misuses of its A.I. models, including the chatbot Claude, over the past eight months. Some examples were similar to past disclosures from Anthropic and other A.I. labs, including suspected Chinese and Iranian government-linked actors targeting dissident and diaspora communities for surveillance.

The report also highlighted cases of Russian state media using Claude to generate online propaganda masquerading as independent reporting, including fabricated claims about an election in Moldova. Anthropic documented another genre of abuse it said was new: attempts to use Claude to develop software for conventional weapons design and development, including firearms, missiles, armed drones and bombs. It detailed three cases in China, two in Russia and one in Yemen. The report does not identify by name which parties were involved in the Yemeni case, but the context makes clear that it is referring to the Iran-backed Houthi militia.

Not buying it!

By methano • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
I could be wrong, but I suspect when OpenAI and Anthropic warn us of all the bad things that their creations are up to, it’s more a ploy to show us how supposedly powerful they are rather than really inform us of something wrong. If they’re using their computers to break into other people’s computers, they’re criminals, not the overlords of some new, amazing technology.

Crime Gaekeepers

By awwshit • Score: 4, Funny Thread

Only we are allowed to be criming. Your criming will be blocked. Can’t explain exactly why we keep failing to stop our own criming, its bleeding edge criming you know.

Yep

By abulafia • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
“Our secret sauce isn’t secret, please regulate our competitors away.”

I think they may be playing a game with the fight they picked with the math folks over the Navier Stokes finding, too. To normal folks that looks greedy and shortsighted. To a wannabe dictator, that looks like a magic mirror.

Re:Not buying it!

By gweihir • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

IMO it is both. Yes, the LLM assholes currently try to pretend their toys are incredibly powerful because their business numbers are abysmally bad and the moment the stupid cash dries up, they implode. But what LLMs can do is lift somebody stupid (and willing to do damage but not really capable of it) to the level of a, say, lower medium-level attacker. Any good STEM engineer and scientist knows how easy it is to do a lot of damage. The stupid do not. But fit them with an LLM that explains things to them, they suddenly can do things far out of their reach before.

Re:It was just ordinary research…

By gweihir • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Oddly, I saw some biology researcher saying this morning that they were switching to local models because a) these clown models won’t let him do his work and b) he’s now worried that they’ll steal his work.

With the recent very likely stealing of the Navier-Stokes proof, (b) seems like a very real risk.

Android Rolling Out Passkey Transfers Between Password Managers

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Android is rolling out a system-level way to securely transfer passwords and passkeys between credential managers, eliminating the need to export passwords as unencrypted text files or manually recreate passkeys. The feature initially supports Google Password Manager, 1Password, Bitwarden, and Dashlane, with other providers able to integrate through Android’s Credentials Transfer API. 9to5Google reports on how to initiate the system-backed transfer method:
1. Start the move: Open your new password manager app and choose the option to import or copy your passwords and passkeys from another provider. The password manager will then hand the task over to Android.
2. Let Android securely coordinate the data transfer: Android will automatically detect existing password managers on your device and show you which you can import from.
3. Review and authorize: Once you tap “Continue,” Android will bring you to your existing password manager to select, review, and authorize the transfer. Then your data will be quickly and securely transferred between the apps in just a few seconds.

Re:How long until the scams begin?

By Archangel Michael • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

If passkeys are movable, then they can be duplicated and reused by nefarious actors as easy as this seems to indicate here.

I have not, and do not, and never will trust passkeys as primary security for anything.

Passkeys can be compelled legally, with and sometimes without a warrant. Passwords cannot be compelled at all. SCOTUS has already set the rules.

enshitification of passkeys

By bloodhawk • Score: 3 Thread
passkeys started off as a wonderful tech that you could ensure were bound to a device even if a little difficult for some newbies to use. Now through Apple et al they have now become as shitty as the tech they were designed to replace where they can be transferred and stolen by scammers through social engineering scams.

ABC Show Won’t Air Interview With Democrat Because of FCC Threats

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica:
ABC’s Jimmy Kimmel said he will be interviewing a Democratic candidate for Senate tonight, but the interview will be on YouTube only and not broadcast on TV because of threats made by the Federal Communications Commission. Kimmel has been a prime target in the Trump FCC’s attacks on ABC and its owner, Disney. In his monologue last night, Kimmel said he’ll be interviewing Democrat James Talarico, a state representative who is running against Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton for a seat in the US Senate.

In previous years, such an interview would have aired on the broadcast show via local stations throughout the country, Kimmel said. This time, it will only be on the Jimmy Kimmel Live YouTube channel in order to prevent further trouble for individual stations that hold FCC licenses, he said. “I’ll be interviewing James Talarico tomorrow night under unusual circumstances,” Kimmel told the audience on Wednesday. “For a lot of years, for the whole 20-plus years of our show, in fact, I’ve been interviewing Americans who are running for office with no problem at all, just like Letterman did, Leno did, Arsenio, et cetera, et cetera. I’ve interviewed a lot of political candidates, from Hillary Clinton to Ted Cruz to Donald Trump himself.” But as Kimmel said, “something has changed.” Disney suspended Kimmel briefly last year after FCC Chairman Brendan Carr threatened to revoke the licenses of ABC stations for “news distortion” if they continued to air Kimmel’s show. […]

Kimmel said the decision to put the interview on YouTube was made out of consideration for local stations that could face FCC threats to their broadcast licenses. “And so out of consideration for our local stations, especially our ABC affiliates in Texas who would have to deal with this nonsense, my interview tomorrow with James Talarico will not air on television,” Kimmel said. “It will be posted on YouTube instead. It will not be on TV. So if you want to learn about a candidate for the Senate tomorrow, you will have to go to the Jimmy Kimmel Live YouTube channel where you will see it in its entirety, and thank goodness we have that because in the America we live in right now, that is the best that we can do, until November, of course.”
“Jimmy Kimmel’s decision to keep his interview with a Senate candidate off the air shows just how far this administration’s campaign of censorship and control has gone,” FCC Commissioner Anna Gomez, the commission’s only Democrat, said today. Gomez said the FCC “has no lawful authority to threaten broadcast licenses over guest bookings or editorial decisions,” and that “no host, local affiliate, or network should have to weigh federal retaliation before booking a guest for a newsworthy interview. Any attempt to pressure broadcasters into self-censorship undermines both press freedom and the public’s right to hear from candidates in their communities seeking public office.”
The report notes a similar controversy that occurred in February when Stephen Colbert said CBS forbade him from interviewing Talarico. CBS denied prohibiting the interview but said it gave Colbert “legal guidance that the broadcast could trigger the FCC equal-time rule for two other candidates […] and presented options for how the equal time for other candidates could be fulfilled.” That interview also ended up being published on YouTube.

Re:Feelingx wrong, its equal time rule

By unrtst • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Broadcast networks have to give the different major parties equal time. Since Kimmel only wants to give a voice to one party he cannot use the broadcast network.

On what basis are you saying that Kimmel only wants to give voice to one party?

Also, they do NOT have to give equal time, and “major parties” is not part of it; They have to afford equal opportunities to all other such candidates for that office. IE: if Paxton passes on the opportunity, that doesn’t block Talarico from airing.

ALSO, as you implied, the “broadcast network” has to give said opportunity. I see nothing in 47USC315 that says it has to be on the same show.

47USC315 also says, “Appearance by a legally qualified candidate on any … bona fide news interview … shall not be deemed to be use of a broadcasting station within the meaning of this subsection.” IANAL, but this isn’t a paid for appearance, and it is an interview, and it’s only falling under this provision because the FCC recently reclassified how late night shows are handled.

There are too many ways in which this doesn’t apply or is being applied incorrectly. It’s the government strong arming a broadcaster to chill speech.

Re:Kimmel Doesn’t Want to give Republicans a Platf

By cmdr_klarg • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Talarico on the other hand appears to be a good family man that doesn’t cheat on his wife and attends church regularly.

In other words, a Christian who actually follows Christ.

The notion that Jesus Christ would approve of the current crop of GOP politicians is absolutely laughable to me. You’re not a Christian if “love thy neighbor” becomes “persecute thy neighbor is they’re non-white or trans”.

(Disclaimer: I don’t follow Christ either, as I’m an atheist. I was raised Catholic, so I know all about how Christianity is supposed to be.)

Re:Kimmel Doesn’t Want to give Republicans a Platf

By drnb • Score: 5, Informative Thread
“The equal-time rule (47 U.S. Code 315 - Candidates for public office[1]) specifies that American radio and television broadcast stations must provide equivalent access to competing political candidates. This means, for example, that if a station broadcasts a message by a candidate, it must offer the same amount of time on the same terms (in, say, prime time) to an opposing candidate.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…

Re:Kimmel Doesn’t Want to give Republicans a Platf

By karmawarrior • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Under exceptions the same Wikipedia article, correctly, points out the current administration changed these rules to apply to… late night talk shows:

If the airing was within a documentary, bona fide news interview, scheduled newscast, or an on-the-spot news event, the equal-time rule does not apply. Late-night and daytime talk show interviews were long considered to be bona fide news segments until the FCC issued new guidance in 2026 signaling that these types of shows would no longer be automatically granted the bona fide news exemption.[3][4]

This is a new interpretation of the equal time rule designed to make it difficult for late night shows to interview politicians, and if it wasn’t for SCOTUS being nakedly partisan these days, it wouldn’t muster a single court’s scrutiny.

Re:The scary thing about American evangelicalism

By alcmena • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Dude, seriously, show us on the doll where rsilvergun hurt you… I don’t agree or disagree with rsilvergun’s posts, but to see the same AC BS every single time has gotten old.

OpenAI Targets Work of Wall Street Junior Bankers

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
OpenAI has launched ChatGPT for Financial Services, a Wall Street-focused version of ChatGPT Work developed with Morgan Stanley and Evercore that can research companies, analyze financial data, and build presentations using the company’s latest and most advanced model, GPT-6 Astra. “We’re effectively teaching ChatGPT to research like an analyst and back up its conclusions like an analyst as well,” said OpenAI’s Vice President of Product, Nick Turley. CNBC reports:
The rollout puts OpenAI deeper into territory traditionally occupied by Wall Street’s entry-level bankers, the recent college graduates called analysts and associates that the industry has employed for decades to research deals and create pitchbooks. It also showcases the company’s continued push into enterprise offerings as it gears up for what is widely expected to be a blockbuster IPO.

In a live demonstration of the new offering, Turley showed the platform analyzing a potential M&A target, pulling financial figures from industry-standard data sources and creating a formatted PowerPoint deck based on a bank’s pre-formatted style guide. “It’s very easy to make slides that look good, but it’s much harder to make slides [that] actually make sense,” Turley said. “To get here, ChatGPT had to choose the relevant peers. It had to pull the prices into a spreadsheet. It had to check the chart against the data, and it had to explain the selloff and the rebound.”

Good start.

By Gravis Zero • Score: 4, Funny Thread

Next they need to start replacing executives in publicly traded corporations. They would be equally evil but at least we could turn them off.

Acceptable use of AI

By alvinrod • Score: 5, Funny Thread
This is a case where even if the AI hallucinates results, they are unlikely to be any more egregious than those hallucinated by the humans being replaced.

Jeff Bezos said…

By ebunga • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Jeff Bezos said that his job, like all CEOs, is to make decisions, big decisions, usually about one per day, sometimes only one per week. Imagine how much more profitable a company could be if they replaced their CEOs with AI… literally 10000000x more decisions per day could be decided which means the company would be 10000000x more profitable.

Any publicly traded company that hasn’t replaced their executives with AI at this point is negligent and derelict in their obligations to shareholders extract as much profit as possible for their benefit.

The job…

By fropenn • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
The job of an analyst isn’t to report or summarize the numbers that are already available. The job is to find the lies and BS and call it out. I’ve yet to see an AI that can do this.

But, if all you want is cheap garbage…then AI it is!

Re:When retirements happen, what then?

By nightflameauto • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

If there are no junior bankers in the pipeline, what happens when the senior bankers retire? Or is the plan to replace them with AI too?

That’s what we keep being told in programming positions. AI now does the entry job programming work. No newbs to gain experience. Us seniors aren’t to worry about it though, because by the time we retire, AI will be good enough to do our jobs too. Which isn’t as reassuring as the executives want us to think it is, because we know the two possibilities. 1) They never actually get that good and we get incentivized to stay past where we’re financially able to retire. 2) The get that good before we’re really ready to retire, but the bottom line requires us to be pushed out because our salaries are no longer justified when the AI can do the job.

Yet another lose-lose proposition. How wonderful.

IMDb Adds ‘Digital Creator’ Profiles For the First Time

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
IMDb is introducing “Digital Creator” as a new professional category on IMDb and IMDbPro, giving streamers, vloggers, influencers, video essayists, and other online creators a "dedicated way to represent [their] work and connect with audiences, industry peers, and potential employers,” according to IMDb. Variety reports:
The category includes sub-professions to further specify their work, including “Streamer,” “Vlogger,” “Video Essayist,” “Video Creator,” “Gaming Creator” and “Influencer.”

The “Digital Creator” designation functions as a professional category on IMDb and IMDbPro. Creators can feature multiple professions on their page, so someone who is both a digital creator and an actor can “represent the full scope of their work in one place,” per the company. No existing film or TV credits are required to establish a profile as a Digital Creator.

Just like /.

By dargaud • Score: 5, Informative Thread
IMDB is one of the grandads of the web, like /. (1995 for both ?), and I was using both of them within a month of their creation (although it took me a good while before I created an account on /. as I thought I had nothing to contribute at the time). IMDB was only movies first. Then I was annoyed when they added TV series. Then even more annoyed with the addition of video games. And now they add onlyfans ‘models’ ? GET OFF MY LAWN !!!

Automattic’s Board Forces CEO Matt Mullenweg Into Leave of Absence

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Automattic’s board has placed founder and CEO Matt Mullenweg on a paid leave of absence against his will, with CFO Mark Davies taking over as interim CEO. The reason for the move remains unclear, but it follows years of legal fights, layoffs, employee departures, and controversy surrounding Mullenweg’s leadership. TechCrunch reports:
Earlier Wednesday, Mullenweg posted in a Slack channel visible to all employees that the company’s chief financial officer, Mark Davies, had “conspired” with other board members Ann Dunwoody, Toni Schneider, and Sue Decker to vote to put Mullenweg on a paid leave of absence.

The message read: “And the biggest news: I won’t be able to make the [meeting] tomorrow. @Mark Davies has conspired with @Ann Dunwoody, @Toni, and @Sue Decker behind my back and they voted to put me on a paid leave of absence. I voted against that. Wishing Mark and all of you the very best. To clarify @Mark Davies was voted as interim CEO. I received the resolution 50 minutes before the meeting start, and requested repeatedly for time to have it reviewed by independent legal counsel, even a few hours, which was denied.”

A Slack message to the open source WordPress.org community from the project’s executive director, Mary Hubbard, also confirmed Mullenweg’s change of status at the commercial company. However, Hubbard said that WordPress.org was not impacted. “Matt remains the leader of the WordPress project and I remain Executive Director of WordPress. Our teams, priorities, and work continue as planned,” she wrote.

Two wrongs

By Unpopular Opinions • Score: 3 Thread

Are apparently trying to make a right in the WP world?

Automattic and WP Engine now have the same problem

By DeplorableCodeMonkey • Score: 5, Informative Thread

WordPress is basically designed, last I checked, to be entirely dependent on WordPress.org’s infrastructure. That infrastructure is Matt’s petty little fiefdom. That’s how updates, plugins, themes, etc. are normally delivered to the users.

This is why WordPress should have created a real governance board a long time ago or formally submitted to the ASF or CNCF so that there’d be adults in the room who could punt someone like Matt if he decided to weaponize the FOSS infrastructure to punish a commercial rival.

This isn’t even a license problem or anything like that. It’s a simple case of one man who has way too much leverage over the entire ecosystem of a major FOSS project.

Too little too late

By CEC-P • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
The guy is a hot-headed train wreck that gets offended by everything, makes every business decision personal, and will burn the company down to save his ego. He should have been gone 3 years ago. I’ve never seen someone who deserves their job and title less than this clown.

He acts like he’s not the problem.

By toxonix • Score: 3 Thread

When all the people you work with don’t like you, maybe you’re the problem.

Re:Automattic and WP Engine now have the same prob

By machineghost • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

It’s not quite *that* simple.

In OSS, *anyone* can fork the code. If it was as simple as “the original creator is doing stupid/terrible things”, everyone involved could fork and start contributing to the fork (anyone ever hear of a little database called MySQL … which is now more popularly known as MariaDB?)

But this isn’t just about OSS code, it’s about the corporation. It’s that corporation that is the root of the entire problem.

The Apple Watch Gets Its Siri AI Upgrade

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Wired:
Apple has unveiled the Apple Watch Series 12 and Ultra 4 today during itsSeptember hardware event. The new models retain the signature designs of their predecessors but add a faster S11 chip, new health and fitness features, and the watchOS 27 software update announced atWWDC last June. Both the Series 12 and Ultra 4 run on the upgraded S11 chip, which Apple says delivers faster CPU and GPU performance, along with improved Siri capabilities. Apple is also expanding the smartwatch’s wellness-tracking suite with a redesigned Health app that includes a Longevity tab with new metrics, like Health Age and a Readiness score.

There’s also a new “Health Sensing System,” designed with 32 electrodes for more accurate readings (the Series 11 only had two), photodiodes organized in a ring to capture light more efficiently, and new LEDs that allow heart rate measurements to be collected every 5 seconds, giving you a continuous stream of heart data throughout the day.
Apple Watch Series 12 also includes faster charging, though battery life remains at 24 hours. Meanwhile, the Ultra 4 increases battery life to 50 hours.
WatchOS 27 also brings deeper Siri and Apple Intelligence integration, including AI-suggested apps, new one-handed gestures, expanded workout and women’s health tracking, and Siri Recap for real-time transcription and translation.

So meta glasses not ok apple watch ok?

By ZERO1ZERO • Score: 3 Thread
So now we have to worry about apple watch constantly recording audio and thi is being touted a feature, ‘to keep you in the moment’ (lol) but people shit their pants when they think someone might record something with a camera (thats in meta glasses)

Re:That’s great and all

By nightflameauto • Score: 5, Funny Thread

But buried under all those features, is it easy to just see the time?

Why would you want a watch to tell you the time? It’s so you never miss a notice and everybody notices you getting your notices. Good grief. Do you even tech, bro?

I guess I’m out of date

By mnemotronic • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
My watch, a Fitbit 3, has a battery life of over a year. Using a regular watch battery. Granted it doesn’t do Siri or tell me when I’m about to die. Life is full of tradeoffs.

Europe May Finally Have Found a Space Entrepreneur Who Is Meeting the Moment

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
French entrepreneur Helene Huby is emerging as one of Europe’s most ambitious space leaders, with The Exploration Company raising a record $450 million Series C as it develops the Nyx cargo capsule, a crewed spacecraft, and a reusable heavy-lift rocket. Huby argues Europe risks falling irrelevance without a much larger rocket flying at high cadence. Her company is targeting a 400,000-pound-thrust methane engine test by 2028 and an aggressive 2033 timeline for the launcher. Ars Technica reports:
“The fundraise we have done right now is not sufficient to build the massive rocket we have in mind, so there will be another fundraise,” she said. “Right now, we’re going to be very, very focused on the execution. We must dock with the space station, with the capsule, as fast as possible. We must build this rocket engine and de-risk it as fast as possible. I think once one of these two milestones is achieved, we’ll be talking fundraise again.”

Critics may look at Huby and her company and say that is a lot of big talk for a company that only has a single, partial success in spaceflight to its credit. And sure, it is. But that’s kind of the point. So much of the spaceflight community in Europe has been concerned with either the large aerospace primes seeking government handouts to protect their turf or small launch startups. There has been a stunning lack of big, visionary thinking.

Few people on the continent seem to recognize that multibillion investments by US companies such as SpaceX, Blue Origin, and Amazon in space, and their many imitators in China, are radically transforming spaceflight. As the world changes, Huby does not seem willing to stand on the sidelines in Europe and bemoan capitalism in space. Rather, she seems to be saying it is not too late for Europe to seize the day.

“We need to have European politicians who are ambitious,” she said. “Entrepreneurs cannot do this alone. We need to be backed by the politicians and by the European Space Agency. But we have to start by achieving the crazy targets that we’ve set up for ourselves. That will give trust to others to believe in what we’re doing.”

“Finally”?

By pla • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Whatever happened to Richard Branson? Virgin Galactic was one of the major players at the start of the current wave of private launch vehicles but seems to have completely dropped off the radar.

Re:“rocket ambition dept”?

By JaredOfEuropa • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Pioneering reusable rockets, manned launches to the ISS, a super heavy lifter, lowest launch cost on the planet, a launch cadence that looks like something from an SF novel, and a satellite constellation that brings in enough money to pretty much self-fund the development of their future spacecraft. And in case anyone wants to point out their income from lucrative launch deals with the US government, one should also consider not how much those contracts are costing the US taxpayer, but how much they are saving (compared to the next cheapest launch provider).

Say what you want about Musk, SpaceX is certainly delivering the goods when it comes to space flight.

No “Fire at will” in the EU

By hwstar • Score: 3 Thread

If the CEO decides she doesn’t like someone, she won’t be able to “Musk” employees as easily as in the United States.

Musk is known for “On the spot” firings:

Elon Musk has a well-documented history of on-the-spot terminations, a practice often referred to internally by employees as “rage firings.” While Musk has publicly denied firing people in a blind rage, multiple investigative reports, biographies, and high-profile public interactions outline definitive examples of him terminating employees instantly.

Reported in a deep-dive investigation by Wired, this is considered the quintessential example of an Elon Musk “rage firing”:

  During a stressful production ramp-up for the Model 3 at the Tesla Gigafactory, a young, enthusiastic engineer was asked by a red-faced Musk why a conveyor belt had stopped moving. The engineer explained that a safety sensor was triggering and blocking the line. Musk reportedly shouted, “You’re a fucking idiot! Get the fuck out and don’t come back!”. The Result: The bewildered engineer was told by his manager minutes later that he was officially fired on Musk’s direct orders. The culture became so tense during this era that managers reportedly told subordinates not to walk past Musk’s desk out of fear that a wrong look or a word out of place would get them fired on the spot.

Dark Energy Debunked? Cosmic Acceleration May Be an Illusion

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot
alternative_right shares a report from ScienceDaily:
A new analysis of more than 1,700 supernovae is questioning whether the universe is really accelerating at all. After accounting for the ages of the stars that produce these explosions, researchers found signs that cosmic expansion may actually be slowing. They also argue that the apparent acceleration changes with direction, which would be difficult to explain with dark energy. Other cosmologists dispute the conclusion, setting up a major test for upcoming observatories.
The analysis has been published in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

The conclusion is disputed, though. The report mentions a separate paper co-authored by Professor Maria Vincenzi, also at the University of Oxford, that “concludes that observations continue to support an accelerating universe.”

The “reality is just messing with us” hypothesis

By Jeremi • Score: 5, Funny Thread

The size of the universe is increasing…
but the rate at which it is increasing is decreasing…
but the rate at which the rate is decreasing is increasing…
but the rate at which the rate of the rate is increasing is decreasing…
but the rate at which the rate of the rate of the rate is decreasing in increasing…
[… and so on, ad infinitum…]

Re: Not an expert

By Baron_Yam • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Nope. No matter where you look in the sky, on large enough scales it looks the same. There’s no indication that things are significantly different in any particular direction.

There can’t be a ‘source’ of a Big Bang that looks like that. It has to happen everywhere or the sky would show signs that it was all accelerating away from a single point.

What we can say is we don’t really have much ability to figure out what happened early on. The conditions are too extreme and we don’t have any way to model what might have been going on. That’s not faith either, that’s, “We don’t know and might never be able to figure it out”.

Douglas Adams was right

By necro81 • Score: 5, Funny Thread
“There is a theory which states that if ever anyone discovers exactly what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable. There is another theory which states that this has already happened.”

Re: Not an expert

By wierd_w • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

This is the prevailing dogma, but has recently been challenged from more recent observations. (In defense of the dogma, we have very aggressively tested for preferred rotations with local experiments involving high energy particles. If there *is* a preferred rotation, its effect is vanishingly small, to the point of being functionally indestinguishable from flat spacetime at local scales, to an astonishing level of precision. This strongly suggests ‘sampling error’ for JWST data that follows)

https://academic.oup.com/mnras…

Recent large area surveys by JWST suggests that there is a preferred rotational direction and axis to disparate galaxies. Such a finding is inconsistent with the presumption of widescale anisotropy. (But again, that’s a very bold statement)

It may yet be ruled out through further observations as a sampling error, but the statement that there are *no* indications isotropy is incorrect. The mere existence of this survey says otherwise.

If there really is a universal preferred rotation, then a ‘fuzzy’, ‘proximal’ position could be given as a baricenter. It wouldnt be definitive; too much can happen as random events to compute an exact baricenter, but a statistically probable, proximal area could be defined with some confidence threshold.

Again, *assuming* the JWST readings arent just a sampling error. Which it probably is.

Re: Not an expert

By Bumbul • Score: 5, Informative Thread

with the obvious one that the universe started off tiny and empty space filled in around it — the big bang.

No, there was no “empty space” around it. The space itself expanded in the cosmic inflation, per current theory.