Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Hack Reveals Suno AI Music Generator Scraped YouTube, Deezer, and Genius
  2. FCC Plans To Repeal 39% TV Ownership Cap
  3. Google and Epic Cancel Settlement; Third-Party App Stores Coming To Google Play
  4. FreeBSD 16 Retires the Last of Its GPL Code
  5. OpenAI Launches a Keypad for AI Agents
  6. Stripe, Advent Offer to Buy PayPal For More Than $53 Billion
  7. Microsoft Patches a Record 570 Security Flaws
  8. Astronauts Take First X-Rays In Space
  9. House Votes For Permanent Daylight Saving Time
  10. Iran Abused Mobile Networks’ Vulnerabilities To Locate US Military In Middle East
  11. OpenAI’s First Device Will Be Moveable, Screenless Speaker Built as AI Companion
  12. Google Images Gets a Pinterest-Like Redesign Focused On Discovery
  13. Lawsuit Claims Meta’s Layoff Decisions Were Made By AI, Not Humans
  14. Google DeepMind Calls For US To Spearhead AI Standards Body
  15. Linux Foundation’s Latest Foray Is To Standardize Internet-Native Payments For AI Agents

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Hack Reveals Suno AI Music Generator Scraped YouTube, Deezer, and Genius

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
A hacker who breached Suno reportedly revealed source code and training-library details showing the AI music generator scraped millions of songs and lyrics from sources including YouTube Music, Deezer, Genius, Pond5, Jamendo, Freesound, and podcast RSS feeds. “The hacked data is a rare look at exactly how AI models and tools are built,” reports 404 Media. “Suno is one of the largest AI music generation tools on the internet, and has been the subject of several major lawsuits from the record industry, which accused the company of training on millions of copyrighted songs.” Suno maintains that its models were trained on publicly available music files and metadata as fair use. 404 Media reports:
The Recording Industry Association of America accused Suno of ripping songs directly from YouTube; the hacked data seen by 404 Media confirms this. The hacked material includes source code that appears to be from 2023 and 2024 that includes scraping instructions and details about the scope of at least some of the scraping. For example, the comments in one file note that they will pull from “genius_hq, youtube_music, freesound, jamendo, imp, deezer, ytm_tagged,” and that “non-music will be filtered out.” A file called “youtube_music” notes that at the time the file was last updated, it had ingested “2,013,545 music clips.” Another file contains comments about different datasets Suno had created, which included “113,879 hours of youtube_music,” “17,615 hours of genius_hq,” “410 hours of free sound,” “19,514 hours of imslp,” “3,726 hours of jamendo,” “62,117 hours of pond5_music,” “12,287 hours of deezer,” “152,162 hours of ytm_tagged,” and “103 hours of musescore_lyrics.” In total, this is at least decades worth of music.

Other code the hacker shared with 404 Media appeared to look specifically for vocals by searching specifically for acapella versions of songs on YouTube. The code also suggested that Suno was using proxies to scrape songs from YouTube through a company called Bright Data, which sells scraping tools, infrastructure, and data services. Additional code shows that with the help of an online tool called PodcastIndex, Suno identified 420,000 different podcasts that had at least five, 30-minute episodes and sought to download roughly 1 million hours of podcasts.

[…] The hacker, ellie.191, told 404 Media they breached the company by hacking an individual employee using the Shai-Hulud worm, a supply chain attack that allowed hackers to harvest GitHub and cloud service credentials. They said they also accessed Suno’s customer list, which included customers’ emails and/or phone numbers and Stripe payment details, depending on what they used to login. The hacker provided a sample of some of the customers, some of whom confirmed to 404 Media they had used their phone number to sign up for Suno and said they were never notified of a breach. The hacker told 404 Media they had no specific motivation for hacking Suno and said “I like to hack anything and everything.”

FCC Plans To Repeal 39% TV Ownership Cap

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
The FCC plans to vote on repealing local TV ownership limits, including the 39% national audience cap that currently restricts how much of the U.S. market a single broadcast group can reach. Engadget reports:
On August 6, commissioners will hold a ballot to repeal Section 303 of the Communications Act, and with it the 39 percent rule. In essence, the rule limits the reach of a local TV network to no more than 39 percent of the U.S.’ total audience market. In its place, the FCC would move to a system whereby it would personally approve or reject TV ownership deals on a case-by-case basis.

It’s not clear if the FCC even has the authority to reject Section 303 without the explicit consent of the legislature. As Lawrence J. Spiwak wrote in the Yale Journal on Regulation back in January, Section 10 of the Communications Act expressly forbids the FCC from bending the rules around Section 303.
“Americans no longer trust the legacy national media to report the news fairly or accurately,” wrote FCC Chairman Brendan Carr in an op-ed published on Breitbart. “In fact, only eight percent of Americans have a great deal of trust in mass media. That figure is even lower among Republicans — sitting at a mere three percent.”

"… Many local broadcast TV stations are getting hollowed out as a result and turning into little more than mouthpieces for programming produced in New York and Hollywood,” he alleged. “That is not what Congress or the FCC intended.”

How will this help?

By nightflameauto • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

“Americans no longer trust the legacy national media to report the news fairly or accurately,” wrote FCC Chairman Brendan Carr in an op-ed published on Breitbart. “In fact, only eight percent of Americans have a great deal of trust in mass media.

And how will allowing even more of the media to be owned by a single business help that? Honestly, this feels like clearing the way to make sure only the “correct” message is allowed out on mass media. And we all know that means more alternative facts and less actual reality.

Google and Epic Cancel Settlement; Third-Party App Stores Coming To Google Play

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica:
Big changes are coming to Android apps, but they’re not the changes Google wanted. The settlement between Google and Epic that aimed to put to rest the companies’ long-running antitrust battle is being withdrawn, and that means third-party app stores are coming to the Play Store. Google has confirmed that it will begin distributing rival app stores next week, setting the stage for competing platforms to take a bite out of Google’s Android revenue stream. […] Google and Epic were set to return to court on July 16 to argue in favor of the settlement. However, the writing may have been on the wall. In a recent expert analysis provided to the court, MIT economics professor Nancy Rose noted that the settlement was “unlikely to enable Google Play’s potential competitors to overcome their long-standing network-effect disadvantage in a timely manner.”

With settlement approval looking increasingly unlikely, Epic and Google agreed this week to call the whole thing off. Here’s how Google Trust and Reputation Communications Lead Dan Jackson explains the company’s decision: “We’ve agreed with Epic to withdraw our motion to modify the US Court’s injunction rather than prolonging this process which creates uncertainty for the ecosystem. This allows us to focus on executing our recently announced global business model evolution to deliver greater app store choice, lower prices, and more opportunities for developers and users. We remain committed to maintaining Android’s industry-leading security and fostering a competitive ecosystem where every app store and developer has the freedom to compete. In parallel, we continue to comply with the US Court’s injunction.”

In a brief filing (PDF), Google’s legal team informs the court that Google is prepared to begin distributing third-party app stores in Google Play on July 22. Under the terms of Judge Donato’s original injunction, these stores will have access to the full catalog of Google Play apps by default. Developers will have the option to opt out of distribution in these stores, and Google has a support page explaining how to do so. Google also has documentation on how app stores can get access to the Google Play catalog. It won’t be mirroring those apps in any shady storefront that asks. The court has allowed Google to charge reasonable fees to cover its security and compliance review of third-party stores, which will be $5,000 per year.

Google will also require approved stores to block malware, respect intellectual property, and include mechanisms to update and uninstall apps. App stores can be removed from the program if more than 1 percent of attempted app installs appear to be malware or unwanted software. It’s unclear if there will be separate, possibly more stringent requirements for storefront distribution in the Play Store. However, Google is prohibited from unreasonably blocking third-party store clients uploaded to Google Play. The changes Google has announced under the Epic agreement will proceed for now. That means Registered App Stores will happen globally, but they will probably only appear in the Play Store for US users. Google hasn’t specified if there will be any differences in the features available to the stores downloaded from Play versus registered stores.

F-Droid

By TwistedGreen • Score: 3 Thread

Does this mean I will be able to download F-Droid from Google Play?

Re:F-Droid

By caseih • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Nope. Google is still set to kill F-Droid later this year when they turn on mandatory developer certificates which will require developers to pay Google and hand over their personal information, regardless of what app store they want to distribute through. This will essentially kill F-Droid for casual users (their main target is almost certainly NewPipe). Yes you can still use F-Droid but you’ll have to do a 24 hour delay before you can install F-Droid.

FreeBSD 16 Retires the Last of Its GPL Code

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
FreeBSD 16 has removed the last GPL-licensed code from its base system, retiring the old GNU ‘dialog’ implementation after the installer moved to ‘bsddialog’ and the final dependency was disabled. Phoronix reports:
This ticket to retire dialog was opened back in February while is now merged to the FreeBSD source tree for what will become FreeBSD 16.0. With dialog removed, the latest FreeBSD code now retires the GNU sub-tree of the FreeBSD base system now that no more GNU code remains. FreeBSD 16.0 is working its way toward release that is expected to happen in December 2027.

Re:Context?

By Junta • Score: 5, Funny Thread

If only there was something about FreeBSD that might provide a clue about what license they would be wanting the software to use…

Re:Context?

By martin-boundary • Score: 4, Funny Thread
Kids today need AI to tell them about licenses. In my day, we learned about them from the BBC.

Eric.

I think I started this

By howardjp • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

27 years ago, I wrote a clean implementation of grep, specifically for this purpose. It has since been adopted by (at least) FreeBSD, OpenBSD, NetBSD, Haiku, Minix, MacOS, iOS, and who knows what else. So this is really cool to see this.

Re:I think I started this

By howardjp • Score: 4 Thread

I wrote that line. But use the source. https://github.com/freebsd/fre…

OpenAI Launches a Keypad for AI Agents

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
OpenAI’s first hardware device is a limited-edition desktop keypad called the Codex Micro that lets users monitor and control AI coding agents. Axios reports:
Codex Micro is a collaboration with Work Louder, a boutique hardware company known for customizable mechanical keyboards and shortcut controllers for developers and designers. The small, square macro pad — with backlit keys, a rotary knob and a tiny joystick — sits beside your regular keyboard as a physical shortcut box for common Codex actions and shows the status of your agents. The keys are customizable and include a push-to-talk option as well as a dial to adjust your reasoning setting. Codex Micro is a niche device for Codex power users and will only be available until it sells out. It’s priced at $230.

Is the Peak Here Yet?

By crunchy_one • Score: 3 Thread
$230 for $20 worth of electronics? All this device demonstrates is the utter contempt in which OpenAI holds its “customers”.

You know it’s a bubble when silly devices show up

By ArghBlarg • Score: 3 Thread

I’m old enough to remember this.

Though it looks kinda funky, will keep an eye out for one on the surplus junk market after the bubble pops, could be a fun control surface for other things.

WTF?

By CEC-P • Score: 4, Informative Thread
I already have one of these. It’s called my keyboard. And I know where all the keys are to control anything in any UI without even looking down. And it was $18 not $230.

Stripe, Advent Offer to Buy PayPal For More Than $53 Billion

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Stripe and private equity firm Advent International have reportedly made a joint $60.50-per-share offer to buy PayPal, valuing the payments company at more than $53 billion. The bid is said to represent a 28% premium to PayPal’s latest closing price and is backed by roughly $50 billion in committed bank financing.

private equity firm

By Anonymous Coward • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

You thought PayPal was shitty now? Come back in one year.

Nothing ever gets better

By MpVpRb • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

…when companies are acquired.
Paypal sucked before, expect it to get worse.

Paypal needs higher fees

By jsepeta • Score: 3 Thread

that’s what’s missing from their business offerings

Microsoft Patches a Record 570 Security Flaws

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Krebs on Security:
Microsoft today released software updates to plug at least 570 security holes in its Windows operating systems and other software, almost triple the number of vulnerabilities the software giant fixed in its record-smashing Patch Tuesday release last month. Microsoft attributed the burgeoning patch counts to vulnerability discoveries aided by artificial intelligence. Nearly 60 of the bugs quashed in July’s Patch Tuesday earned a “critical” severity rating, meaning miscreants or malware could use them to seize remote control over a Windows device with little or no help from the user. Microsoft also addressed three zero-day flaws, including two that are already being exploited in the wild.

Two of the zero-day weaknesses allow an attacker to elevate their user rights on a Windows system, as do approximately 250 other elevation of privilege flaws fixed this month; they include CVE-2026-56155 - an Active Directory Federation Services bug — and CVE-2026-56164, a Microsoft Sharepoint vulnerability. CVE-2026-50661 is a security feature bypass in Windows BitLocker that could allow attackers to gain access to encrypted data if they have physical access to the device. Microsoft said this bug has been detailed publicly, but that it is not aware of any active exploitation.

In a blog post on July 9, Microsoft Executive Vice President Pavan Davuluri wrote that Windows users will notice “a higher volume of security updates included in each security release” as a result of AI aiding in the discovery of vulnerabilities. “The pace of vulnerability discovery is changing with advances in AI making it possible to find more issues, faster, across more code, with new mechanisms that can accelerate both discovery and analysis,” Davuluri wrote.

An AMAZING number of flaws

By Futurepower(R) • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
The big underlying issue is why does Microsoft deliver software with so many flaws?

Microsoft says 622

By schwit1 • Score: 3 Thread

https://msrc.microsoft.com/upd…

“If people want a severity hook, July has 26 vulnerabilities with a CVSS base score above 9.0, and 13 of those sit at 9.8,” said Josh Taylor, lead cybersecurity analyst at Fortra

Re:An AMAZING number of flaws

By AmiMoJo • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

It doesn’t, they just turned AI on it for the first time.

Linux is going through the same thing, only with less good AI and more slowly.

Right once, patch away

By Z80a • Score: 3 Thread

To find a security flaw, you only need to be right once.
So if you have a machine that has a shitload of false positives, and have a way to filter em quickly, you end up with a bunch of true positives.
Now to code, you ideally want to always be right, which is not quite ideal for a machine that does a lot of false positives.
It’s a pretty fun scenario, specially if you’re not the only one running the security flaw finding machine.

Astronauts Take First X-Rays In Space

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Astronauts on SpaceX’s Fram2 mission successfully captured diagnostic X-ray images in orbit for the first time. The milestone gives space medicine a second imaging option beyond ultrasound and could help future crews diagnose injuries, inspect equipment, and support longer missions to the moon or beyond. Popular Science reports:
Commercial off-the-shelf X-ray machines like the ice cooler-sized MinXray TR90BH now allow users to perform scans on subjects far away from traditional facilities. In 2022, [Mayo Clinic researcher Sheyna Gifford] assisted in preparing a crew to successfully generate digital X-rays while experiencing microgravity during a parabolic flight. Gifford’s team then spent years collaborating with SpaceX to plan another feasibility study. This time, they didn’t want to operate an X-ray machine aboard an aircraft simulating the conditions in space — they intended to use the equipment during an orbital mission.

The process was detailed in a recently published study in the journal Radiology, and focuses on last year’s Fram2 mission. Instead of days of medical training, astronauts spent only four hours learning how to use their portable radiography device. They then took preflight X-rays of a hand, forearm, chest, abdomen, and pelvis ahead of their SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket launch on March 31, 2025. Once in orbit, the team calibrated the system before testing their MinXray on the same body parts as well as a smartwatch.

Once the crew returned, a trio of independent radiologists reviewed the orbital X-ray images based on their positioning, spatial and contrast resolutions, and general scan quality. Although positioning scores were slightly decreased for the central body images, every other scan held up to similar examples created on Earth. Meanwhile, the astronauts reported that using the machine was easy despite minimal prior coaching. Looking ahead, researchers hope to conduct further X-ray tests during orbital missions, while continuing to reduce the overall size of equipment.

Dosage

By necro81 • Score: 5, Informative Thread
Medical x-ray equipment these days requires less radiation exposure than in years past. Still, it is a radiation dose on top of what space crews are already experiencing. NASA guidelines limit astronauts to 600 millisieverts (mSv) for their whole flight career, and 250 mSv for an acute event (e.g., a solar storm). They estimate a 6-month stay on the ISS could be 77-86 mSv, depending on solar conditions. By comparison, living on the surface of the Earth will dose about 3 mSv/yr.

A typical chest x-ray is about 0.1 mSv. So not nothing, but also not a huge amount, even if they did 10 images in quick succession. And weighed against the medical diagnostic benefit, it’s probably a decent tradeoff.

Re:Captain Dabbin.

By sg_oneill • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Its space. When it comes to radiation, an X-Ray machine is by far the least of their worries. Astronauts come back from space missions utterly glowing with radiation.

Admittedly the cancer rate amongst astronauts isnt THAT much higher (just under 1/3 of astronaut deaths compared to just over 1/5th of the general population), but this is also a cohort that have mostly been non smoking tea-totaller health conscious non-junk-eating people so its definitely a thing.

Like yeah, over exposure to medical X-Rays is totally a risk factor, but astronauts go into space knowing that space is actively trying to radiate them, freeze them, burn them, pop their lungs, boil their blood and suffocate them. Its a soldiers gambit really.

Re:Why is this a big deal?

By SouthSeb • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Because you need sufficient space and to be very still while x-raying. Also, space ships and stations get a much higher amount of external radiation than Earth (like, 20x more) and they needed to make sure it wouldn’t interfere with the scans.

House Votes For Permanent Daylight Saving Time

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
The House voted 308-117 to pass the Sunshine Protection Act, which would make daylight saving time permanent nationwide and end the twice-yearly clock change. The bill faces an uncertain future in the Senate, “where one G.O.P. leader said it was unclear whether it could move ahead and at least one Republican appears inclined to try to block it,” reports The New York Times. Some sleep experts oppose permanent daylight saving time, arguing that year-round standard time better aligns with circadian rhythms and winter morning safety. The New York Times reports:
President Trump has championed the effort to save an extra hour of daylight before nightfall and make the time zone permanent, describing the ritual of moving clocks forward in the spring and back in the fall a “ridiculous, twice yearly production.” “We are going with the far more popular alternative, Saving Daylight, which gives you a longer, brighter Day,” Mr. Trump wrote in a social media post in May. “And who can be against that.”

A sizable bloc of Florida Republicans in Congress is leading the charge on legislation that would do just that, mandating daylight saving time nationwide for the entire year. Representative Vern Buchanan of the Tampa Bay area is backing the bill, and Representative Anna Paulina Luna, another Tampa Bay-area Republican, cosponsored it. House leaders agreed to allow a vote on the measure this week as a sweetener for Ms. Luna in their efforts to persuade her to lift a legislative blockade she had maintained as she sought to force Senate action on a voting restriction bill Mr. Trump has championed.

Re:They should do the same in The Netherlands

By ShadowRangerRIT • Score: 5, Informative Thread
America tried this under Nixon. And reacted exactly as you’re predicting; it was instituted in January 1974, and rescinded within the year. Turns out, if nothing else, parents hate elementary school students walking to school or waiting for buses in pitch black at the coldest time of day.

Re:They should do the same in The Netherlands

By eth1 • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

If the Netherlands did this, they would reverse it immediately after the first winter. Not getting any sunlight until past 10.00 AM is so annoying, and the cost of road maintenance because rush hours is when everywhere, there is still ice on the roads, will be prohibitive.

People complaining have simply no clue how it is to have DST in the winter, and can’t imagine.

Sunlight in the morning is relatively useless: most people are waking up, getting ready for work, and going to work, all of which can be done with artificial light.

Sunlight in the evening is valuable: people get off work and need to work in their yards, kids have after-school sports/activities, etc. outside, which are all either easier or only possible with sunlight.

Re:They should do the same in The Netherlands

By HiThere • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

You’re being silly. If the time is stable, then you’ll set your hours to what it is. There’s nothing special about the time number “10:00 AM”. Businesses could have summer and winter hours if they chose to…at one time that wasn’t uncommon.

Scientific evidence says Standard Time is better

By dskoll • Score: 5, Informative Thread

All the evidence suggests that it’s better for our health to stay on Standard Time rather than Daylight Saving time, and sleep experts agree.

But I guess scientific evidence hasn’t meant anything to politicians for quite some time now.

Re:They should do the same in The Netherlands

By Bert64 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The sun always rises later in the winter, that’s the nature of winter… The only thing this changes is the arbitrary numbers that are displayed when the sun is rising.
Instead of fixating around those arbitrary numbers, plan your day around actual environment factors like when the sun rises etc.

Iran Abused Mobile Networks’ Vulnerabilities To Locate US Military In Middle East

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from TechCrunch:
The Iranian government abused well-known vulnerabilities in the global telecoms infrastructure to locate U.S. military personnel in the build-up to the Iran War, as well as in the early days of the conflict, according to Financial Times. The Iranian government exploited Signaling System 7, or SS7, a set of protocols for 2G and 3G networks that has long been the backbone of how cellular networks connect to each other to route subscribers’ calls and texts around the world, the newspaper reported, citing research by the Mobile Surveillance Monitor, as well as anonymous government officials with knowledge of the spy campaign.

Intelligence agencies have long abused SS7 to track cellphones abroad, which is what happened in this campaign. Using this technique, Iran was reportedly able to locate U.S. military forces stationed in military bases as well as hotels in Iraq, Bahrain, and other countries in the Middle East, which allowed the regime to strike them. These attacks resulted in several injuries. Apart from SS7, Iran also abused advertising technology used to serve tailored ads to cellphone users, another well-known surveillance technique that relies on everyday technology.

DJT, stuck in a war of his own making

By Epeeist • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Both Putin and Trump have started wars that they cannot win, and from which they cannot withdraw without an enormous loss of face.

The only difference is that Putin’s war only effects Russia’s economy, while Trump’s war effects the whole world.

Re:DJT, stuck in a war of his own making

By sit1963nz • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
More so the USA long term as more of the world financially decouples from the USA.
And even when the fat man has fallen off his perch things will not “go back to how they used to be” , the world has already decided it will never been under control of the USA again.

That is called “being competent”....

By gweihir • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

An enemy in a war does not “abuse” your weaknesses. They are “using” them if they are competent. And on the other side? Simple: Having these vulnerabilities is stupid. But the whole war is excessively stupid on the US side. Not the most stupid war ever fought, but probably up in the all-time top-10. And to think the only reason for that war is that a multiple-felon president needs to hide how he raped children.

Sigh.

By ledow • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I’ll say it again:

Active military personnel carrying around standard mobile phones is such a breach of all kinds of basic security protocols that it should be illegal.

But can’t let the troops get bored, eh? Have to let them do their fitbit on board your cruiser that you’re trying to keep secret, and have them checking into Facebook while they’re in Helmand province, and giving away their movements when they’re running around your bases at home, and having an always-on device capable of tracking and recording everything from audio to the radiowaves to location, made by the Chinese, wherever they go.

Dumbest fucking idea ever.

Re:Code is law.

By AleRunner • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

If the code allows it, it’s not abuse.

That’s actually pretty much a fair comment. A number of the mobile systems were originally designed to be more secure than they were finally delivered. GSM in particular. These systems then had security removed from them and monitoring added in during standardization according to American (and later European and other) requests. Probably what Iran has done to kill American soldiers are things that could have been eliminated from the mobile communication standards if the security agencies had been putting a priority on protecting us over spying.

This is a key reminder for us that when NSA and GCHQ demand that the security of systems is weakened they are doing the opposite of their jobs. They are endangering both American and British military people alongside also endangering civilians and allied military people worldwide. They are taking time from experts who should be spending it looking for vulnerabilities and building more secure systems. They are using that time to introduce weaknesses, for example getting rid of end to end encryption and adding in global identifiers, which also make the job of securing the system much more complex.

This isn’t just an American problem. Europe’s new Chat Control 2.0 is the same idea. There are pre-image attacks where you can make child porn which matches the image-hash of the material you want to track. Russia and Iran will be able to use those pre-image attacks to track people who have their secret materials.

Calling this “abuse” is misleading. It’s just Iran using weaknesses that our security services left in the systems, wanting to be able to use themselves and which Iran then discovered.

OpenAI’s First Device Will Be Moveable, Screenless Speaker Built as AI Companion

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
OpenAI is reportedly developing a screen-free, portable smart speaker meant to act as a personalized home computer and humanlike AI companion. “It will help control smart-home appliances, play media, answer questions, respond to messages and tap into the range of capabilities offered by OpenAI’s ChatGPT,” reports Bloomberg, citing people familiar with the matter. The device, expected to be unveiled this year and released in 2027, would mark OpenAI’s first major hardware push after acquiring Jony Ive’s io Products. Bloomberg reports:
Apple sued OpenAI last week, accusing the company of stealing trade secrets. But OpenAI believes that the device veers significantly from anything Apple has on the market today and that it’s unlikely that it violates trade secrets belonging to the iPhone maker, the people said. OpenAI’s success in hardware will hinge on bringing a novel approach to the market — something it aims to do with the smart speaker. For instance, the device’s technology is meant to become increasingly personalized and proactive as it gains a deeper understanding of its owner over time, according to the people.

OpenAI envisions the device anticipating needs, surfacing information proactively and serving as an expert on its user, they said. Though the speaker is designed to stay in the home, it will be easy to move around the house. OpenAI believes the product’s defining feature will be its personality and ability to connect on a humanlike level with users. The speaker incorporates mechanical elements that can move on their own, creating a sense that it is alive and not just an object responding to commands. The machine also will draw on personal information such as emails to better understand its owner. The goal is for the device to feel like a companion and become a physical manifestation of OpenAI’s ChatGPT. Still, the exact plans could change as the company works through the development and legal process.

The device’s communication abilities will rely on a more advanced version of the ChatGPT Voice Mode — GPT-Live — that OpenAI rolled out this month. The new voice mode is designed to act more like a human. It can listen and talk at the same time, adapt more naturally during conversations, and quickly process information. Though the new product resembles a speaker, OpenAI internally describes it as the first of its kind: a computer built for AI to help make busy people more productive. It includes a camera and other sensors that help it understand a user’s surroundings and context, as well as advanced AI models beyond those available on conventional smart speakers. Another central difference is that the device includes a rechargeable battery, allowing it to be carried from room to room throughout the day. A user could bring it into the laundry room while doing chores, move it into the kitchen for cooking assistance, and later place it in a living room or bedroom to have it play music. It can also remain plugged into a single room if the customer chooses.

Re:Not very “Innovative”

By 93 Escort Wagon • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Great, just what we needed. ANOTHER “Alexa” type of always listening speaker device.

* NOW with extra evil!! *

Sounds ghastly

By Jeremi • Score: 5, Funny Thread

OpenAI envisions the device anticipating needs, surfacing information proactively and serving as an expert on its user, they said.

Will it have a Genuine People Personality? Perhaps a cheerful and sunny disposition?

Re:Not very “Innovative”

By alcmena • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

If I remember correctly, surveys showed that people use smart speakers to do a very small number of things:
1. Set a timer
2. Play music
3. Turn on / off lights (if they have smart devices)

That’s really it. I’ve had a Google Home setup with a mini speaker in most rooms of my house, and a Home compatible smart display in the kitchen. My wife uses the kitchen one to set and check timers whenever she’s cooking. The minis get used to mostly turn on / off lights (all lights are controlled by smart switches). We do play music, but fairly rarely since they don’t sound super great. She tried using the screen to look up recipes, but it was too small to be really useful so we set up an old computer with a 21” screen for that use instead.

The annoying thing is that since I got “upgraded” from the previous Google Assistant to Gemini, the time to complete a task went from 1-3 seconds on average to about 10-15 seconds on average. They cost Google more now, they take longer, and they still don’t do anything better for me. I regret performing the upgrade and wish there was an undo button so I could go back to the fast, but dumb, assistant as that worked quite well for my needs.

Re:Even if the features appealed…

By BeaverCleaver • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

I don’t get the AI companies’ fascination with voice-only input and audio-only output. It’s a strict subset of what the device in people’s hands can already do. Further, every single product that has aimed for this has flopped and you would think they would get the hint by now…

Voice input will always be less accurate than writing. Voice output will always be slower than displaying writing on a screen. Input accuracy is even worse if you don’t have a perfect mid-atlantic accent.

I can only come up with two explanations for why companies (not just “AI” companies) keep trying to force this on us.
1. They have so much money they don’t care, or they are using investors’ money and have a robust contract in place so it’s OK if they waste the money.
2. The profit from selling all the data from inside your house is worth loads of money. I can see how knowing exactly what is being said in every household could be valuable to many different customers: advertisers, governments, health insurers.... note also that none of these customers have your best interests at heart. It gets even worse if you work from home and these devices can listen to confidential business calls.

I don’t allow any such devices in my house. If I visit people who do have such devices, it’s fun to mess with them. Obligatory XKCD: https://xkcd.com/1807/

Re:what?

By Morromist • Score: 5, Funny Thread

I can kinda see what they’re thinking:

“we could make it a phone app but we want to sell a physical object, and if it was just a thing with a screen it might as well be an app, so we’ll make it a speaker, which could also be an app, but is sorta more divorced from the phone I guess. HEY get off our backs we don’t have any new ideas, we just need to keep building the possibility we may become a huge apple-like company by saying we’re developing this device WHICH WILL BE REVOLUTIONARY. Also old people don’t know how to use AI -or phones really- but they sure as hell know how to yell at smart speakers!”

Google Images Gets a Pinterest-Like Redesign Focused On Discovery

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Google Images is getting a Pinterest-like redesign that turns image search into a personalized discovery feed, with “For You” galleries, real-time updates, and collections for saving visual ideas. “Google is also adding a way for users to create AI images right in Search, as it celebrates 25 years since the debut of Google Images,” reports TechCrunch. From the report:
After navigating to the redesigned Google Images, users will see a “For You” gallery of images tailored to their interests and browsing history. Like Pinterest, the gallery is designed for continuous browsing, with Google saying it updates in real time with new images. As users browse, they can save ideas to their “collections,” which will appear as tabs above the main gallery of photos. For example, users can create collections for things like vacation outfit ideas, travel inspiration, and ways to design a reading nook, which they can come back to later.

[…] As for generating images directly in Search, Google says the feature is meant for moments when you have a highly specific idea for an image that doesn’t already exist online. Google is bringing image generation directly into AI Overviews on Search and will use its latest Nano Banana model to transform a text prompt into a custom visual. The feature can also help users reimagine spaces and visualize ideas, such as seeing what a room might look like painted red or what a dorm room with a coastal theme could look like.

Pinterest ruined Google’s image search

By SoCalChris • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

JFC, Pinterest absolutely ruined Google’s image search results years ago. Now they’re trying to emulate that?

Anybody have any better alternatives?

Wrong discovery

By devslash0 • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

The only discovery they should be focusing on is making it easier for me to find the exact image I’m looking for.

Re:Wrong discovery

By jenningsthecat • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

The only discovery they should be focusing on is making it easier for me to find the exact image I’m looking for.

Their goal is to tell you what you want, not to give you what you want. You seem to be under the mistaken impression that you’re the customer and not the product.

Oh boy

By paul_engr • Score: 3 Thread
I’m sure glad i changed search engines. What ever happened to “ok this works, dont fucking change it?”

Lawsuit Claims Meta’s Layoff Decisions Were Made By AI, Not Humans

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
A lawsuit from 26 Meta employees alleges the company used AI-driven scoring and monitoring systems to select workers for layoffs, disproportionately targeting employees with disabilities or those who had taken protected medical, family, pregnancy, or parental leave. “Meta did not assemble the termination list through the considered judgment of managers who knew the work. Instead, Meta used a constellation of internal artificial-intelligence systems — including a system referred to internally as ‘Metamate,’ employee-trained ‘second-brain’ agents, keystroke- and activity-monitoring data, AI-token-usage dashboards, and algorithmically assisted performance ranking and calibration — to score, rank, and select employees for inclusion on the list,” the lawsuit (PDF) said. Ars Technica reports:
Employees were allegedly graded, among other things, on how much they used Meta’s AI tools. “Meta’s internal dashboards classified employees by their stage of adoption of its artificial-intelligence tools, using categories such as ‘AI Native,’ ‘AI First,’ and ‘AI Enabled,’" the lawsuit said. The lawsuit is apparently “the first against a major U.S. company to challenge the alleged use of AI in conducting layoffs,” according to Reuters. The complaint alleges that Meta’s tools for monitoring employees did not account for differences caused by disabilities and protected leaves. “Those tools draw on inputs — performance ratings, calibration scores, productivity and output metrics, ‘AI-native’ ratings, and AI-token consumption — that, by design, cannot be accumulated by an employee who is on protected medical or family leave, or whose output is reduced by a disability,” the lawsuit said.

The lawsuit alleged that Meta management did not take steps to adjust scores for employees who took leave or who requested reasonable accommodations for disabilities. “Meta did not neutralize those inputs for protected leave; did not exclude protected-leave-takers or accommodation-seekers from the selection cohort; and did not pause the system for the individualized, leave- and accommodation-neutral review that the law requires,” the complaint alleged. “The result was that employees who took protected leaves were disproportionately selected for layoff, based on scoring that not only failed to account for their protected leaves, but in effect penalized the employees for exercising their legal rights to these leaves.” The 26 plaintiffs requested leaves or disability accommodations in the 24 months before being selected for layoffs, the lawsuit said. The layoffs are not yet finalized, but employees are scheduled to start losing their jobs on July 22, the lawsuit said.
“These claims lack merit and are not based on facts,” said Meta in a statement. “Workforce management and organizational decisions were and are made by people, not AI.”

So their AI was just Deloitte or PwC

By geek • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

This is exactly what companies like PwC come in and do. The AI just did it faster.

What goes around

By Himmy32 • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Working for a business that has captured, analyzed, and commoditized the personal data of the general public, then having those company algorithms come back to bite the workers who enabled the system is mildly poetic, but still a depressing step in the march to a dystopian future.

Whether Ai or not…

By flibbidyfloo • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
I think the Ai angle might be an unwelcome distraction from the case that could hurt the employees. If Meta can show they didn’t actually use Ai to make any decisions, but merely to assemble statistics that they could have gathered via traditional means, then the case loses credibility. If the employees can actually show that the layoffs disproportionately affected workers engaged in protected activities and those with disabilities, they’d probably have a good enough case, especially if those decisions were made by cold, calculating humans.

Re: Is it much different?

By sinkskinkshrieks • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Intel did something similar 20 years ago but inadvertently laid off the principal engineer for a major chip project that ended up costing them millions. Oops.

Re:Hard to see Meta Losing

By Dragonslicer • Score: 5, Informative Thread

The employees have to prove that their protected status was targeted to win, and that is a pretty tough sell IMO. It seems like the protected status was more of a side effect of “performance.”

Not at all. If they use a metric of “Worked at least X hours in the past 12 months”, and a person worked fewer than X hours because they were on parental leave, firing them would not be a “side effect of performance”, it would be a direct violation of their legal protection.

Google DeepMind Calls For US To Spearhead AI Standards Body

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Google DeepMind chief Demis Hassabis is calling for a U.S.-led AI standards body to review frontier models for national security risks such as cybersecurity and biological threats. His proposal would create a federally overseen public-private organization, initially voluntary and eventually mandatory for U.S. deployment. CNBC reports:
Google DeepMind boss Demis Hassabis, a Nobel laureate, said in an article posted on X on Tuesday that “urgent action” was needed to address risks associated with artificial general intelligence (AGI) — the point at which AI matches or surpasses human intelligence. “We’ve already seen the challenges frontier models pose for cybersecurity, and other threats including nuclear and bio risks may soon emerge as capabilities continue to advance,” he said.

[…] Hassabis said the U.S. was well positioned to lead in developing an AI framework “given its economic and technical standing.” “It could establish a new Standards Body modelled on a federally overseen public-private partnership or self-regulatory organisation, much like the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), with a board that includes independent leading technical experts and open-source representatives,” he added. FINRA regulates brokerage firms and exchange markets in the U.S.

The proposed body would need “substantial” funding “in order to attract world-class technical talent and provide the necessary compute resources for large-scale testing,” Hassabis said. Funding would “likely” come from industry, he added. Frontier labs would initially voluntarily share models with the body for review up to 30 days before release, before becoming mandatory for deployment in the U.S. market after being shown to be “effective.” “Specific agentic AI tests could look for attempts to bypass safety guardrails or signs of deception, and ensure best practices, such as digitally watermarking AI-generated images and generating human-readable output tokens to understand model reasoning,” Hassabis said.
Further reading: Over 200 Economists Say ‘We Must Act Now’ On AI’s Economic Impact

Re:Oh fuck right off

By Valgrus Thunderaxe • Score: 4 Thread
I wouldn’t let the US run a Taco Bell.

Re:Oh fuck right off

By nightflameauto • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Your shitty chat bot is not a national security risk.

This is about pulling up the ladder behind themselves. Create enough bureaucratic hurdles that new players can’t get a foot in the door and it’s a win for the already established players. They are either feeling like they’re doing good enough to make this effort worthwhile, or they see someone nipping at their heels that may get thrown off-course if they set up the correct set of barriers right now.

Either way, they’re calling for this during an administration that is known to drop any barrier for someone or some company willing to praise the man in the White House, or throw some gifts at him, or outright bribe him. So AI will become an even more outright rich man’s game. And onward we spiral. You’d think the toilet would finish its flush at some point, but thus far we’re still teetering on the edge.

Re: Demis Hassabis is a scientist

By liqu1d • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
They’ve been saying this shit for years now though. It’s always 6 months away we promise, then another 6 months then another. I’m not saying this guy is full of shit but I’m sure many would be happy to say anything to keep such income.

Re:oh look

By cusco • Score: 5, Informative Thread

They’re desperately trying to keep the Chinese models out, but I doubt they’ll be successful. Chinese AI is mostly outcome-based, they train a bot to wash dishes, a drone to recognize an insect infestation, or mining machinery to find and follow a vein, and equipment purchased from China is going to come with their AI baked in. Sure, they’ll play with chatbots and AGI, but most of their work is devoted to actually accomplishing something besides stock manipulation. Once Chinese AI is seeded throughout the economy in machinery and devices more advanced systems are going to follow.

What happens when

By sit1963nz • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
The rest of the world says “No” to the USA and its demand for control.

96% of the worlds population does not live in the USA, and I can see no good reason to let the 4% run by a pedo dictate anything to anyone.
The US is firmly US first and US only and no treaty seems to survive a ketchup involved temper tantrum , so why try.

Linux Foundation’s Latest Foray Is To Standardize Internet-Native Payments For AI Agents

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot
Today, the Linux Foundation launched the x402 Foundation to standardize internet-native payments for AI agents, APIs, and applications, based on Coinbase’s contributed x402 protocol. Backed by companies including AWS, American Express, Cloudflare, Google, Mastercard, Stripe, and Visa, the effort aims to make payments work directly over HTTP (assuming users are comfortable letting AI agents handle financial transactions).

“The whole idea is to give agents access to money and, through that financial independence, improve their set of capabilities to pretty much anything on the internet,” Lincoln Murr, Coinbase’s AI product lead, told CNBC last month when the company announced the protocol. “In the 2010s, every internet company dealt with the transition from desktop and web into a mobile environment. And now in the late 2020s, we’re seeing the exact same thing happen where agents are going to be the new primary economic actors on the internet.”

I have an idea

By CEC-P • Score: 3 Thread
Name it Copyright Violation Coin and put it on the blockchain! Btw, AI agents are the most gullible things I have ever seen, except the scrapers that grab the data are even worse. Not only do they suffer from nonstop version confusion, quoting 5 different steps to fix an HP printer from 5 different generations that had 5 different menu structures, but they’re susceptible to “ai tar pit traps.” Now imagine it’s one you charge for. And per-page it has an AI generating fake-ish data for the other AI to scrape. This will not work!

Re:Reason AI agents want “access to money”

By Himmy32 • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

The future no one predicted is when Claude buys you lube paid in Crypto to delivered by Amazon drone when he sees you open your browser. It’s weird that with something like OpenClaw that something like this isn’t a joke anymore.