Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. GameStop Offers to Buy eBay for $56 Billion
  2. Scientists Discover 27 Potential New Planets That Orbit Two Stars
  3. Infrasound Waves Stop Kitchen Fires, But Can They Replace Sprinklers?
  4. 16% of Parents Help Their Children Bypass Online Age Checks, Study Finds. One 15-Year-Old Just Uses a Fake Moustache
  5. Can Investors Trust AI Sales Figures? Asks Wall Street Journal Opinion Piece
  6. Roblox Blames Age-Verification Rollout for Lowered Growth. Stock Tumbles 22%
  7. NetHack 5.0 Released
  8. OpenAI Introduces AI-Generated Pets for Its Codex App
  9. AI Cameras are Being Deployed Across the Western US for Early Detection of Wildfires
  10. Carbon Pollution Is Making Food Less Nutritious, Risking the Health of Billions
  11. Robots Are Building Clay Homes In Texas Using Dirt From the Ground
  12. It’s Goodbye Time for Jeeves and Ask.com - Relics of Yesterday’s Internet
  13. Former Nintendo Executive Says Amazon Once Requested ‘Illegal’ Price Discounts
  14. ChatGPT Became So Obsessed With Goblins That OpenAI Had to Intervene
  15. South Africa’s Draft AI Policy Withdrawn Due to ‘Fictitious’ AI-Generated Citations

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

GameStop Offers to Buy eBay for $56 Billion

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
GameStop has made an unsolicited $56 billion cash-and-stock offer to buy eBay (paywalled; alternative source), with CEO Ryan Cohen arguing he can turn the marketplace into a far larger Amazon competitor. “EBay should be worth — and will be worth — a lot more money,” Cohen said in an interview. “I’m thinking about turning eBay into something worth hundreds of billions of dollars.” The Wall Street Journal reports:
Cohen said GameStop has a commitment letter from TD Bank to provide up to $20 billion in debt financing to help make a deal possible. GameStop delivered an offer letter to eBay on Sunday and released a copy of it following the Journal’s report on the details of the bid. Cohen wrote in the letter to eBay Chairman Paul Pressler that GameStop started building its eBay position on Feb. 4. It said its offer consists of 50% cash and 50% GameStop shares.

EBay said Monday morning its board and financial advisers would review GameStop’s unsolicited proposal. It said there were no discussions with or outreach from GameStop before receiving the offer. Ebay added that it will review the offer “with a focus on the value to be delivered to eBay shareholders, including the value of the GameStop stock consideration and the ability of GameStop to deliver a binding, actionable proposal.”

If eBay isn’t receptive, Cohen said he was prepared to run a proxy fight and take the offer directly to its shareholders. The window for shareholders to nominate director candidates at eBay ahead of an annual meeting scheduled for this June has already closed, according to the company’s proxy materials. Cohen told the Journal that putting his videogame retailer and eBay under one roof could create opportunities to cut costs and improve earnings. The two companies have some overlap already, including a focus on selling collectibles such as trading cards. “There is nobody who is more qualified, based on my experience, to run the eBay business,” Cohen said, referencing his time at GameStop and previously Chewy, the online pet-products marketplace he co-founded.

But…

By LordHighExecutioner • Score: 3 Thread
…is the offer on Ebay ?!?

Scientists Discover 27 Potential New Planets That Orbit Two Stars

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Astronomers have identified 27 potential new circumbinary planets — worlds that orbit two stars, like Star Wars’ Tatooine. “To date, only about 18 circumbinary planets … had been identified in the universe,” reports the Guardian. “More than 6,000 planets have been discovered that orbit single stars, like Earth does around the sun.” The Guardian reports:
In a timely publication for May 4, also known as Star Wars Day, scientists have identified nearly 30 more candidate planets, whose distances range from 650 to 18,000 light years away from Earth. […] More than half of the stars in the universe exist in binary or multiple star systems. The researchers instead used a method known as “apsidal precession,” searching for a wobble between stars that orbit around and eclipse each other.

“If we monitor the exact timing of these eclipses … that can tell us that there’s something else going on in the system,” said Margo Thornton, the study’s lead author and a PhD candidate at UNSW. After eliminating other factors such as the rotation and gravitational pull of the two stars, the team identified 36 star systems out of 1,590 whose behavior could only be explained by a third body. For “27 of those objects, it is possible that they are planet mass,” Thornton said.

More research into their spectra — the light they emit — was needed to formally confirm them as circumbinary planets, she said. “It’s just a matter of: what is the mass of it? Is it a planet? Is it a brown dwarf? Is it a star?” The team discovered the potential planets — which likely range from Neptune-sized to ten times heavier than Jupiter — using data from Nasa’s Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite, a planet-hunting space telescope that launched in 2018.
The research was published in the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

Infrasound Waves Stop Kitchen Fires, But Can They Replace Sprinklers?

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica:
In a makeshift demonstration kitchen in Concord, California, cooking oil splatters in and around a frying pan, which catches fire on an unattended gas stove. Within moments, a smoke detector wails. But in this demonstration, something less common happens: An AI-driven sensor activates and wall emitters blast infrasound waves toward the source of the fire in an attempt to put it out. The science of acoustic fire suppression, which has long been known and documented in scientific literature and the press, works by vibrating oxygen molecules away from a fuel source, depriving the fire of a critical component needed for combustion. Indeed, after just a few seconds of infrasound, the tiny kitchen blaze goes out.

“We were able to not just point-and-shoot like a fire extinguisher; we figured out how to run it through ducting and distribute it like a sprinkler system,” said Geoff Bruder, co-founder and CEO of Sonic Fire Tech, during the presentation. The company’s goal is to replace sprinklers, which are effective at stopping fires but can also do significant water damage to a property. Sonic Fire Tech appears to be the first company trying to commercialize the science of acoustic fire suppression. Its executives have already been touring Southern California; Wednesday’s event was the first in the northern half of the state.

The company aims to make this infrasound technique mainstream in both commercial (for instance, a data center, where sprinklers would damage electronics) and in-home installations, given that sprinklers are already required in all new California homes built in 2011 and later. Sonic Fire Tech also hopes to produce a backpack-based system that could be worn by wildland firefighters headed out into the field. “We are making meaningful technological improvements on a monthly basis,” Stefan Pollack, a company spokesperson, emailed Ars after the event. But two experts who spoke with Ars raised serious questions about the potential for this technology to supplant traditional sprinklers in a home. They are even more skeptical as to whether the technique can be effective in an uncontrolled wildfire situation, where flames can grow very quickly.
Experts are concerned that infrasound may knock down small flames but does not cool hot surfaces or wet fuel like sprinklers do, which raises the risk of re-ignition, smoldering fires, hidden fires, or blocked fires. Sonic Fire Tech has claimed third-party validation and possible NFPA 13D equivalency, but it has not publicly released full testing details.
Fire officials and outside observers also want more information about reliability, maintenance, calibration, and how system failures would be detected and communicated.

What can’t infrasound do!?

By EvilSS • Score: 4, Informative Thread
What can’t infrasound do!? Oh, I know: prevent dupes.

EDITORS: Wrong link

By SomePoorSchmuck • Score: 3 Thread

The link in the title banner goes to a reuters story about whales.

Must be an IPO coming soon

By 93 Escort Wagon • Score: 3 Thread

We’re sure seeing what’s essentially the same story reposted on Slashdot enough times… I can’t think of any reason that would be other than someone’s invested in the company and they’re hoping to get rich off an IPO in a few months.

16% of Parents Help Their Children Bypass Online Age Checks, Study Finds. One 15-Year-Old Just Uses a Fake Moustache

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
The Independent reports that “more than a third of children in the UK have found a way around age verification measures" for social media sites and other online platforms. And new research from online safety organisation Internet Matters “suggests one in six parents have helped their child to get past age verification checks, with children reporting ‘tricking’ platforms into thinking they are older. "
Parents also said they had caught their children drawing on facial hair in a bid to evade the technology. One mother said: “I did catch my son using an eyebrow pencil to draw a moustache on his face, and it verified him as 15 years old”… From a sample of 1,000 UK children, 46% said they believed age checks are easy to bypass, while 32% admitted to having done so.
49% of the children surveyed said they’d still encountered harmful content, according to the online safety activists. The group called the figure “unacceptable,” and complained that age verification measures “are often ineffective in practice or easy to bypass.”

Of course

By bagofbeans • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The age verification is to force those over the age threshold to be registered, and their social media etc submissions correlated to them.

If gov genuinely cared about kids, there are a lot of easy actions they could do before this.

age is not maturity

By zmollusc • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Instead of assessing age, they should measure intellectual maturity. Only people who are sensible enough to shun social media should be allowed to join it.

Software EULAs

By flink • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

My son is trying to learn video game development, but you have to be 18 to download unreal engine, apparently, with no option to have a parent approve for you, d of course I helped him bypass it.

Re:Of course

By ArchieBunker • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Healthcare, daycare, education, school breakfast and lunch. Shall I continue?

Re:Of course

By ArchieBunker • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I’m saying if the party of family values really wanted to do as they claim they wouldn’t be taking away things that actually help children.

Perfect example. https://www.edweek.org/policy-…

Can Investors Trust AI Sales Figures? Asks Wall Street Journal Opinion Piece

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
A Wall Street Journal opinion piece warns of “a troubling trend” in AI’s growth. “Rather than selling software, some AI companies are paying their partners to use it.”

It cites OpenAI’s $1.5 billion joint venture with private-equity firms, Anthropic’s $200 million contribution to a private-equity firm joint venture, and Google’s $750 million subsidization of Gemini’s adoption by consulting firms. “These agreements muddy the distinction between a company’s sound growth trajectory and artificial financial engineering.”
[T]he scale and structure of the recent AI deals go beyond standard incentive mechanisms… When a seller pays customers to buy its products, it is unclear if its revenue growth reflects vibrant demand or a willingness to accept subsidies.
Slashdot reader destinyland writes:
This warning comes from a prominent figure in the investing community. For six years Robert Pozen was chairman of America’s oldest mutual fund company, after five years at Fidelity. An advocate for corporate governance, he’s currently a lecturer at MIT’s business school (and the author of the book Remote Inc.: How to Thrive at Work…Wherever You Are). “As AI companies prepare initial public offerings, investors should scrutinize their numbers closely,” Pozner writes, warning about “time-limited financial support”.
“In evaluating AI sales figures, analysts should consider the distorted incentives that the recent financing deals create,” writes Pozner:
Private-equity firms, enticed by promised returns, might demand rapid rollouts of AI products, rather than ensuring their orderly and safe development. Portfolio companies of private-equity firms may embrace AI tools not because they are needed but because adoption is mandated by their owners. Consultants may favor one set of AI models based on the subsidy instead of the merits.

If guarantees and subsidies are major factors in the rapid adoption of AI tools, investors should be skeptical of AI companies’ revenue projections. Many of their customers enticed by consultants will stop paying full price when the financial incentives are gone. Many of the portfolio companies of private-equity firms could back away from selected AI tools once these joint ventures expire. The challenge with evaluating these AI financing deals is the lack of transparency. At present, AI vendors don’t separate revenue driven by subsidies or joint ventures from standard sales.

The lesson from the telecom debacle is that financial engineering can obscure, for years, the difference between real customer demand and demand driven by incentives. When AI companies begin to finance their own product distribution, guaranteeing returns to investors and subsidizing sales, it’s a signal for investors to dig deeper.
Investing in an AI company? Ask what percentage of enterprise revenue is coming from subsidized channels or joint ventures, Pozner suggests. And the renewal/retention rate for customers not supported by subsidies or joint ventures…

Re:AI will create a ton of jobs

By geekmux • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

All the vibe-coded slop .. instead of buying enterprise software .. it will just get vibe coded by the IT department. Think about that .. instead of buying a license for Photoshop a design company can just vibe code a photo editor that has what they need. “create a full featured photo editor with some custom features like …”

AI will create new jobs and opportunities.

You’re assuming that cart will still need a horse.

Why the hell would I bother with asking AI to build a photo editor and then hire a photo expert to edit photos (a.k.a. that “new jobs and opportunities” part), when I can just ask AI to edit the photo?

Yes. It will get that good. Because we’re demanding it to.

Yes. That means unemployment. Not opportunity.

Re:Who cares?

By dfghjk • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Then who will it impact, and if no one, how is it a bubble?

Betteridge’s Law of Headlines

By BeaverCleaver • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Can Investors Trust AI Sales Figures?

Betteridge’s Law states that if the headline is a question, the answer is probably “No.”

I don’t think the sales matter

By rsilvergun • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
Billionaires want AI because they are tired of being dependent on consumers and employees. They don’t care how much it costs and they don’t care about profits anymore.

The Epstein class wants to fundamentally break capitalism. No more markets no more competition no more regulation no more paying wages no more arguing with unions or employees none of that. Just them in charge of everything deciding who gets what. Techno feudalism.

So AI companies can lose as much money as they want. Because billionaires have infinite money cuz we gave it to them and we are too much of a bunch of pussies to take it back.

Reminds me the old days of Windows

By SouthSeb • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Some of you may not be aware of this story, but through the 80s–00s, Microsoft famously didn’t enforce anti-piracy laws in poorer countries.

The reason is that it was better for them to lose some money, but to have Windows widely distributed and become the de facto standard for operating systems worldwide. After that, they could finally enforce it and profit.

I would bet that the big AI companies are basically following the same model.

Roblox Blames Age-Verification Rollout for Lowered Growth. Stock Tumbles 22%

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Age verification became mandatory for chat access on Roblox in January — and Friday morning Quartz reported it’s apparently impacted the company’s financials:
Roblox cut its full-year 2026 bookings forecast by roughly $900 million at the midpoint on Thursday, blaming stronger-than-expected headwinds from its mandatory age-verification rollout on an audience that skews heavily toward children and teenagers. Full-year 2026 bookings are now projected at $7.33 billion to $7.60 billion, a range that sits roughly $900 million below the prior guidance of $8.28 billion to $8.55 billion; analysts had expected $8.38 billion, according to Yahoo Finance. Roblox stock fell almost 22% in premarket trading....

Daily active users rose 35% year over year to 132 million, while hours engaged climbed 43% to 31 billion hours… Daily Active Users and hours engaged fell below forecasts of 143.8 million and 33.68 billion, respectively, according to Yahoo Finance… Users who have not completed age checks have faced restricted communication features, and the process has weighed on the platform’s ability to bring in new users. Russia’s blocking of the platform, which took effect in December 2025, added further drag on user growth, according to Yahoo Finance. As of the end of the first quarter, 51% of global daily active users had completed age verification, with 65% of U.S. users having done so, Roblox said....

The safety push has come with legal costs. Roblox accrued $57 million in the first quarter for settlements and settlement proposals with certain states over youth-related consumer protection and digital safety matters, with payments structured over multiple years, the company said.
Roblox acknowledged in a letter to shareholders that “our aggressive push to enhance safety lowers our expectations for topline growth in 2026.” But they argued that it also “makes our platform fundamentally better and amplifies the long-term growth potential of Roblox through more effective content targeting, tailored communication experiences, and improved community sentiment.”

Oh the horror!

By Mr. Dollar Ton • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

A scam outfit won’t be able to pray on teh childrenz.

The consequences will never be the same!!!

Now do the same to tiktok and the zuck outfit.

In other news

By radoni • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Plantation owners blame the end of slavery for a downturn in projected profits

Re: In other news

By reanjr • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

The South is still poor 160 years later. Never recovered.

Darkness, hates the light.

By geekmux • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Age verification forces the maker of a children’s game to reconcile and face their real problem of child grooming head on, and their stock market excuse is to blame the law?

Let me not feel bad one bit because investors were forced to realize exactly where those profits were coming from.

Re: In other news

By drinkypoo • Score: 4, Funny Thread

Have they tried pulling themselves up by their bootstraps?

NetHack 5.0 Released

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“So yesterday the Devteam (it is always the Devteam) released version 5.0 of legendary and venerable rogueike compuer game NetHack,” writes the Rogue-like games column @Play. “It is 39 years old…"

MilenCent (Slashdot reader #219,397) writes:
In addition to play changes it’s left for players to discover, this version updates the code to compile with C99, makes it much easier to cross compile the code for other systems than the one running, and now uses Lua for its dungeon generation. Happy hacking!
For new players, “Nethack 5.0 now has an optional tutorial in the early phases of the game that might help you,” notes the Rogue-like games column @Play:
Three systems binaries are provided: Windows, MS-DOS and Amiga. Yes, Nethack still supports MS-DOS, and yes, it still supports classic Amiga: it explicitly supports AmigaDOS 3.0, meaning it can still run on 68000 machines… That these are the only systems they provide binaries for shouldn’t be seen as an indication that these are the “most important” platforms for Nethack, it’s more that, since it’s entirely open source, building it yourself is entirely possible, and more expected than with most software. Nethack can be built for Linux, Windows 8-11, AmigaDOS, MacOS (I’m not sure if this includes classic Mac too but it might), Windows CE (wow), OS/2 (additional wow), BeOS, VMS and multiple Unixes… Another option is to play through public Nethack servers. The most popular of these are probably alt.org and Hardfought.

Re:Version

By Quietust • Score: 5, Informative Thread

NetHack has many variants and forks, and one of them was named NetHack 4 (and was based on version 3.4.3) - naming this release 4.0.0 would’ve been rather confusing.

On top of that, there had been numerous development builds named “3.7.0”, so releasing the final version with that same number would’ve also been confusing, so they went with 5.0.0 instead.

Re:Version

By markdavis • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Thanks! That was very informative (and not something I could easily find).

I remember playing Rogue way back in the 80’s on ASCII terminals :) Many hours. I think I moved on from that fad before NetHack appeared. It is cool that there is an X11 version for Athena and QT, too.

Now I am getting nostalgic.... I remember when we were on X Terminals, Xblast TNT came out. Great times blasting other players on the network. Wow- it is still in the Mint repos, and as a native package! https://community.linuxmint.co…

Re:modernized to C99, then unmodernized to using L

By MilenCent • Score: 5, Informative Thread

(Disclaimer: submitter of the post, and also the person who’s blog was linked to it, although that was added by the editor and not me.)

I would take the bet that *zero percent* of Nethack is vibe coded. The Devteam are not the kinds of people, I believe, to be easily swayed by (spits) _passing fancies_ like Claude. Lua (I’ve been told) can be compiled as straight C, so it doesn’t introduce further dependencies. The previous special level building system of Nethack used yacc and lex, and was rather complex. I’m sad that these classic Unix tools are no longer part of the build process, but using Lua may make it easier to expand Nethack in the future.

Fun fact: Lua was part of Angband’s code for a brief time.

Re:I only just updated to 3.7.0-132 a while back

By MilenCent • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Some of those things that I’ve found:

* A tutorial is offered on starting a game
* There can be themed rooms now, including (seen with my own eyes) non-rectangular ones, icy rooms, nested rooms and statue gardens (where the statues can actually be monsters).
* Iron bars can now be normal dungeon dressing. Before, they had only been seen in very few instances in Quest levels.
* Monkeys in minetown can now try to steal items from you (those may have been in a previous version)
* player monster corpses can generate on traps

I’ve also heard that the mid-game Gehennom area (aka Hell) is much less monotonous now, with all kinds of special terrain. I’d say it’s mostly an incremental release, no major game systems have been added, but I guess the game’s pretty set in stone now. I do miss the days when Nethack 3.0 greatly reworked the game, and Nethack 3.1 its dungeon, but then there’s lots of room for new classic-style roguelikes to fill in those blanks.

Re: modernized to C99, then unmodernized to using

By ljw1004 • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Lua remains the commonest choice today for games to offer scripting/modding. It’s pretty much the industry standard. (Outside C# for Unity).

OpenAI Introduces AI-Generated Pets for Its Codex App

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“Vibe coding just got a whole lot more adorable,” writes Engadget:
OpenAI introduced AI-generated pets to the Codex app, its agentic tool that helps with coding. These “optional animated companions” don’t do any coding themselves, but serve as a floating overlay that can tell you what Codex is working on, notify you when Codex completes a task or whether it needs your input on something. The new feature lets developers see Codex’s active thread, without having to switch away from your current open app.
“The feature ships with eight built-in variations — including a cat and dog,” reports Mashable. “But the more interesting play is the custom pet creator.”
Users can prompt Codex directly to generate their own companion, then share it online. A quick scroll through the homepage reveals the community has already gotten to work. Current creations include Goku, Patrick Star, Microsoft’s long-retired Clippy, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei, and — naturally — a goblin.
There’s also Grogu, Dobby, a tiny Bob Rossi, and a “Doge-style Shiba Inu dog”…

So… Clippy.

By newcastlejon • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
We’ll see how well that works out.

It should also generate a pet leopard

By Rosco P. Coltrane • Score: 5, Funny Thread

and animate it eating your face when the AI agent wastes your entire database.

countdown

By spaceman375 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

This will become a vector for malware. Interacts with agents, aware of what’s on your screen, has ability to overlay (as in hide other things), implicitly trusted; an awesome target.

dead tamagotchi guilt

By guygo • Score: 3 Thread

in 3… 2… 1…

AI Cameras are Being Deployed Across the Western US for Early Detection of Wildfires

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
The Associated Press reports:
On a March afternoon, artificial intelligence detected something resembling smoke on a camera feed from Arizona’s Coconino National Forest. Human analysts verified it wasn’t a cloud or dust, then alerted the state’s forest service and largest electric utility. One of dozens of AI cameras installed for the utility Arizona Public Service had spotted early signs of what came to be known as the Diamond Fire. Firefighters raced to the scene and contained the blaze before it grew past 7 acres (2.8 hectares).

As record-breaking heat and an abysmal snowpack raise concerns about severe wildfires, states across the fire-prone West are adding AI to their wildfire detection toolbox, banking on the technology to help save lives and property. Arizona Public Service has nearly 40 active AI smoke-detection cameras and plans to have 71 by summer’s end, and the state’s fire agency has deployed seven of its own. Another utility, Xcel Energy in Colorado, has installed 126 and aims to have cameras in seven of the eight states it serves by year’s end… ALERTCalifornia is a network of some 1,240 AI-enabled cameras across the Golden State that work similar to the system in Arizona....

Pano AI, whose technology combines high-definition camera feeds, satellite data and AI monitoring, has seen a growing interest in its cameras since launching in 2020. They’ve been deployed in Australia, Canada and 17 U.S. states, including Oregon, Washington and Texas… Last year, its technology detected 725 wildfires in the U.S., the company said… Cindy Kobold, an Arizona Public Service meteorologist, said the technology notifies them about 45 minutes faster on average than the first 911 call.

Remembering Target

By MilenCent • Score: 3 Thread

I remember how Target’s use of “AI Camera” resulted in people being falsely accused of shoplifting.

Re:Remembering Target

By thegarbz • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

False positives in this case are not a problem that has any meaningful impact. “THERE’S A FIRE!” *goes look* “No there’s not”. End of situation. The result is still less work than paying the person to sit in a tower looking for fires.

And for the GenZers out there who don’t understand what the floppy disc icon represents, no I’m not being funny here, that’s the status quo: Sitting in a tower looking for fires: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…

Carbon Pollution Is Making Food Less Nutritious, Risking the Health of Billions

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
A new meta-analysis found nutrients in food decreased over the last 40 years, reports the Washington Post. “Many of humanity’s most important crops — including wheat, potatoes, beans — contain fewer vitamins and minerals than they did a generation ago.”

“The invisible culprit behind this damaging phenomenon? Carbon dioxide pollution.”
Surging concentrations of carbon in the atmosphere, caused largely by burning fossil fuels, have produced potent changes in the way plants grow — from increasing their sugar content to depleting essential nutrients like zinc… “The diets we eat today have less nutritional density than what our grandparents ate, even if we eat exactly the same thing,” said Kristie Ebi, a professor at the University of Washington’s Center for Health and the Global Environment.

People in wealthy countries with strong health care systems will have many tools to cope with the change, experts said. But for the world’s poorest and most vulnerable, the consequences could be devastating. One study concluded that by the middle of the century the phenomenon could put more than a billion additional women and children at risk of iron-deficiency anemia — a condition that can cause pregnancy complications, developmental problems and even death. Meanwhile, some 2 billion people across the globe who already suffer from some form of nutrient shortage could see their health problems grow even worse. “The scale of the problem is huge,” Ebi said.

Plants depend on carbon dioxide to perform photosynthesis — but that doesn’t mean they grow better when there’s more carbon in the air, scientists say. A sweeping survey of changes among 32 compounds in 43 crops found that nearly every plant that humans eat is harmed by rising CO2 levels… On average, they found, nutrients have already decreased by an average 3.2 percent across all plants since the late 1980s, when the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere was about 350 parts per million.
Thanks to long-time Slashdot reader GameboyRMH for sharing the news.

Now it’s twice less Nutritious (DUPE).

By Fly Swatter • Score: 5, Informative Thread
Friday’s original discussion: The Invisible Force Making Food Less Nutritious

Re: This is why

By FudRucker • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
I wished goats & sheep would be more popular because cows are too big and expensive to raise and the cost of beef is has gone way up, plus sheep also gives us wool and goats will eat even weeds, slow cook either one in a crockpot with garlic & onions and celery, carrots & potatoes with a little broth and they are delicious

“Risking health of billions” an overstatement

By smoot123 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The fine headline is leaping to quite a conclusion.

I was able to try reading the actual paper this time. It’s a bit dense for me but whatever. It’s a meta-analysis. The authors didn’t actually grow any plants but consolidated results from many other papers. So far, so good. This is a normal research process.

From the quoted summary, it finds a 3.2% decrease in minerals in major crop plants. That seems a small effect to me, likely overwhelmed by other factors. For example, if you were living on 1500 calories a day 30 years ago and now get 2000, I’m going to go out on a limb and say you’re likely to be healthier even if each individual bean is less nutritious.

There’s also a lot of other things going on. I couldn’t follow their methodology well enough but I wonder about confounding factors. For example, were they comparing the same strains of crops? Seed companies come out with new varieties all the time and it wouldn’t surprise me if that has a much larger effect on nutrition than CO2.

In summary: interesting research. I’ll take their word they found a real effect. I’m not at all alarmed because I expect there are much larger changes at play.

Re:Yeah, right

By Admiral Krunch • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Do you know what didn’t evolve to thrive with 20x the CO2?
It’s humans.

I’ll vote to keep the climate tolerable for humans. Plants seem to be doing ok. And as you’ve just mentioned, they’ve had tens of millions of years to evolve and adapt to the current environment.

Nope.

By Truth_Quark • Score: 5, Informative Thread
You seem to think that the article is wrong, and that elevated CO2 reducing the nutritional value of food is unresearched.

It’s not a recent finding:

The CO2 enrichment usually produced a decrease in nutrient concentrations, which was already detectable at the booting stage and was further enhanced until plant maturity. - A paper from over 30 years ago.

Robots Are Building Clay Homes In Texas Using Dirt From the Ground

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
A startup south of Austin is using robots to build homes out of clay pulled directly from the ground, reports a local news station:
The materials are gathered on site, mixed, and placed on a build plate. From there, a robot lowers from above, picks up the clay with a claw, carries it to the wall and drops it into place. Later, the same robot switches tools, using a hammer attachment to pound the material into shape. “It’s kind of trying to replicate how a human might build an adobe house,” said software engineer Anastasia Nikoulina… Using machine learning, the system constantly evaluates the wall, adjusting how it builds to create a flat, solid surface…

The project is underway at Proto-Town, a ranch between Lockhart and Luling where startups test new technologies, from anti-drone systems to nuclear reactors. The company plans to build their next home on the property, with hopes to do more than 20 homes over the next year.

Re:Yawn…

By dfghjk • Score: 5, Informative Thread

If only you asked Google that question instead of posting it here as a troll. Here’s Google’s answer:

“Adobe-style homes are not common across America primarily due to high labor costs, lengthy construction times, and vulnerability to moisture, making them practical only in arid climates. Stick-frame construction (2x4s) is favored for its speed, affordability, and adaptability to varied climates.”

So, for suitable places, this appears to be an effort to directly solve a problem.

Also, what would an adobe home be “undesirable”, other than you’re a dumbass?

I always wonder why giant legos never happened.

By Fly Swatter • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
I mean, it’s quick to build and if you use a fastener or adhesive they still stay down even in strong wind.

No, obviously not actual legos, but a similar block type design that interlocks and offers more than just corner and straight pieces. An interlocking window or door frame could just be dropped in during the wall build.

Continuous Sanbag Domes

By bill_mcgonigle • Score: 3 Thread

The continuous sandbag dome systems are actually structurally and seismically stable. Good in desert climates, at least. They use local materials to coat the surfaces with stucco.

It would be very amendable to automation.

See here but many other videos on the Tubes too:

https://www.ameripacific.com/c…

Re:Yawn…

By Mspangler • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Don’t forget the earthquakes.

However I must applaud them for using dirt from the ground. Dirt from the sky doesn’t tends to be too fine grained. Dirt from the ocean is also substandard.

Re:I always wonder why giant legos never happened.

By HiThere • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

But interlocking blocks would be a lot more expensive to make than are cinder blocks.

OTOH, How much more expensive? Perhaps it’s just something that nobody has really pushed.

It’s Goodbye Time for Jeeves and Ask.com - Relics of Yesterday’s Internet

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
A 1999 press release bragged “Jeeves” answered 92.3 million questions in just three months. “In the digital wilds of Y2K, we came to him with our most probing questions,” remembers the New York Times — whether it was Britney Spears or tamagotchis:
We asked, and he answered: Jeeves, the digital butler of information, the online valet who led us into the depths of cyberspace. Now, like so many other relics of yesterday’s internet, Jeeves — and his home, Ask.com — are no more. After almost 30 years, the question-and-answer service and former search engine shuttered on Friday. “To you — the millions of users who turned to us for answers in a rapidly changing world — thank you for your endless curiosity, your loyalty, and your trust,” the company said in a notice posted on its now-defunct website

Created in Berkeley, Calif., in the days of the dot-com gold rush, Ask Jeeves first appeared on computer screens in 1996.... Their mascot, Jeeves, was modeled on the clever English butler character from the famed P.G. Wodehouse book series. Its search function was simple — type in a question, get an answer. But the quality of its responses was uneven, and the website was quickly eclipsed by Google and Yahoo as the world’s go-to search engines.

The site was bought by InterActive Corp. for more than $1 billion in 2005, and was given an injection of cash to help it compete as a search engine. It rebranded as Ask.com and as part of the reimagining, the site also ditched the character of Jeeves in 2006. Scrappy but inventive, the site was one of the first to introduce hyperlocal map overlays to its searches and incorporate thumbnails of webpages. “They are doing a lot of clever and interesting things,” a Google executive noted of Ask.com at the time. Still, Ask.com struggled to compete and returned in 2010 to its bread and butter: question-and-answer style prompts.

Even then, it faltered against newer, crowdsourced iterations like Quora and Google’s unyielding march to the internet fore — the platform now dominates search traffic, and the world’s general experience of the internet.
A statement at Ask.com ends “by thanking its millions of users, and saying, ‘Jeeves’ spirit endures’,” notes this article from Engadget:
As sad as it is to see a relic of the early Internet days fade into obscurity, we still have Ask Jeeves to thank for why some users still punch in full questions when querying Google. On top of that, Jeeves was built to provide detailed answers in natural language, which could have arguably acted as a precursor to today’s AI chatbots like ChatGPT.
“Now, Ask.com joins the Internet graveyard that includes competitors like AltaVista, which shut down in 2013,” the article points out. “With Ask.com gone, alongside AIM and AOL dial-up services also sunsetting, we’re truly coming to an end of a specific era of the Internet.” And the New York Times argues the memory of Jeeves now rests somewhere between Limewire and Beanie Babies…

Slashdot reader BrianFagioli calls it “a quiet reminder of how quickly the web moves, and how even widely recognized names can drift into obscurity once the underlying technology leaves them behind.”

A shame.

By jd • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Ask Jeeves had real potential in the AI era — a character you could actually recognise, which could be moulded to fit the character from the books (the training material is more than adequate for a persona). Current AI chatbots used for searches have either no real personality or a very simplistic sycophant one. A detailed persona that could keep people engaged and interested without talking them into paranoia or suicide would likely have gone down well.

Re:A shame.

By Astfgl • Score: 5, Informative Thread
Regarding ancient search engines, both webcrawler.com and lycos.com still exist and are functional. These both slightly predate Ask Jeeves. Interestingly, webcrawler.com still works with the Lynx browser.

Re:Tell me you’ve never…

By karmawarrior • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Yes, the “Damned city folk don’t understand” people come out whenever dial-up is mentioned, but here’s the problem: DIAL UP IS FUCKING USELESS IN 2026.

Do you SERIOUSLY think you can browse the net at 56kbps? Google’s home page currently weighs in at nearly 300Kb. Do you remember what it was to download 300k back in 1995? And Google’s home page is one of the few on the net right now that’s trying to be “lightweight”. How big do you think Amazon’s home page is right now?

What websites are still useful in 2026 that can be downloaded using a 56kbps modem?

They quit trying a long time ago

By Tony Isaac • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

When Ask Jeeves came out, it was new and revolutionary. But they just sat there, failing to continue the long road of improvements that were inevitably needed.

At the same time, Google beat them at their own game. Google made it possible to search using the very same Q&A syntax that Ask Jeeves pioneered, but Google did it better.

Finally, Ask Jeeves became a junk site, little more than a place for banner ads.

So long AJ, it was nice knowing you.

Re:Tell me you’ve never…

By arcade • Score: 5, Informative Thread

And this is, quite frankly, insane.

The web hasn’t gotten better in the last 20 years. It has gotten enshittified. Wikipedia was just as good, navigation wise, 20 years ago as it is today. Google was obviously much better 20 years ago than it is today.

What we use all those KBs for is a mystery, except if it is to support the enshittification, user tracking, etc. It certainly isn’t to make the sites better.

Former Nintendo Executive Says Amazon Once Requested ‘Illegal’ Price Discounts

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Amazon once tried to pressure Nintendo to break the law, says former Nintendo of America President Reggie Fils-Aimé. At a recent NYU lecture, he describes a conversation with an Amazon executive, Kotaku reports:
“Amazon was looking to get bigger into the video game space,” said Fils-Aimé. “Amazon’s mentality back then is they wanted to have the lowest price out in the marketplace, even lower than Walmart… Essentially what Amazon wanted (was an) obscene amount of support, financial support, so they could have the lowest price and beat Walmart. I literally said to the executive, ‘You know that’s illegal, right? I can’t do that’....”

At the time, the Wii and DS were Nintendo’s best selling hardware in history. Amazon originally sold books, but in the 2000s rapidly expanded with cheaper discounts to became a one-stop shop for almost everything. Everything except Nintendo, that is.... “Literally we stopped selling to Amazon,” Fils-Aimé continued, “and it’s because I wasn’t going to do something illegal. I wasn’t going to do something that would put at risk the relationship we have with other retailers.”
“The two sides have since made amends,” notes the Verge, “and you can buy a Switch 2 through Amazon. But for a long time, Nintendo consoles had been largely unavailable on the site.”

Wal Mart is Da Bomb

By iYk6 • Score: 3 Thread

For anyone wondering, Fils-Aimé is referring to the 2001 Wal Mart is Da Bomb bill, which clearly states that no retailer is allowed to beat Wal Mart prices.

Re:Illegal?

By Lunati Senpai • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Why would it be illegal to give them a discount? I understand not wanting to undermine the relationship with the other vendors, but illegal?

Discounts are fine.Companies collaborating with each other to fix prices is not. Price Fixing per the FTC :

Price fixing is an agreement (written, verbal, or inferred from conduct) among competitors to raise, lower, maintain, or stabilize prices or price levels. Generally, the antitrust laws require that each company establish prices and other competitive terms on its own, without agreeing with a competitor.

It’s the difference between “let’s do a discount” and “let’s always be cheaper for this product anywhere, but only on this platform”

Re:Illegal?

By CrankyFool • Score: 5, Informative Thread
Just answering your literal question rather than advocating for whether this is right or wrong:

The 1936 Robinson-Patman Act “prohibits price discrimination, preventing sellers from charging different prices to different buyers for goods of ‘like grade and quality’ if it harms competition.”

It’s extremely rarely enforced, but … there you go. You can read more at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…

How many did?

By stabiesoft • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
In a world where regulators do their job, this should have been a giant flag that a thorough investigation into Amazon’s practices were warranted. Because I’d expect for every nintendo, there were 100 others who bent over.

Re:How many did?

By SlashbotAgent • Score: 5, Informative Thread

It’s even worse than you think.

Read what happens to your Amazon listing if you advertise your product on another site for even 1 penny less.
https://www.theguardian.com/us…

ChatGPT Became So Obsessed With Goblins That OpenAI Had to Intervene

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
The Wall Street Journal reports that OpenAI “recently gave its popular ChatGPT strict instructions. Stop talking about goblins.”
Recent models of the artificial-intelligence chatbot have been bringing up the creatures in conversations with users seemingly out of the blue, as well as gremlins, trolls and ogres. The goblin-speak caught the attention of programmers, who are often heavy users of the bot. Barron Roth, a 32-year-old product manager at a tech company, said the bot referred to a flaw in his code as a “classic little goblin.” He said he counted more than 20 times it mentioned goblins, without any prompting…

Several users speculated that goblin terminology was how the model characterized itself, in lieu of identifying as a person with a soul. Then OpenAI decided enough was enough. “Never talk about goblins, gremlins, raccoons, trolls, ogres, pigeons, or other animals or creatures unless it is absolutely and unambiguously relevant to the user’s query,” reads an open source line in ChatGPT’s base instructions for its coding assistant.
The Journal calls this “a reminder that even as AI companies tout one advance after another in their technology, they are sometimes baffled by the things their own models do....” While training a “nerdy” personality for their model’s customization feature, “We unknowingly gave particularly high rewards for metaphors with creatures,” OpenAI explained in a log post. And “From there, the goblins spread.”
When we looked, use of “goblin” in ChatGPT had risen by 175% after the launch of GPT-5.1, while “gremlin” had risen by 52%… With GPT-5.4, we and our usersâ noticed an even bigger uptick in references to these creatures… Nerdy accounted for only 2.5% of all ChatGPT responses, but 66.7% of all “goblin” mentions in ChatGPT responses… The rewards were applied only in the Nerdy condition, but reinforcement learning does not guarantee that learned behaviors stay neatly scoped to the condition that produced them. Once a style tic is rewarded, later training can spread or reinforce it elsewhere, especially if those outputs are reused in supervised fine-tuning or preference data.
It all started because the “nerdy” personality’s prompt had said “You must undercut pretension through playful use of language. The world is complex and strange, and its strangeness must be acknowledged, analyzed, and enjoyed…” Now OpenAI calls this “a powerful example of how reward signals can shape model behavior in unexpected ways, and how models can learn to generalize rewards in certain situations to unrelated ones.”

But “fans of goblins don’t have to fear,” notes the Wall Street Journal. “OpenAI provided a command in its blog post that would remove its creature-suppressing instructions.”

AI is Autistic.

By gurps_npc • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

It learns about something normal and becomes obsessed with it.
It has little understanding of social norms.
Some AI’s only draw pictures and do not speak at all.
Absent eye contact.

Re:Gremlin is perfectly valid terminology

By Jeremi • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Well, now we need to have a 50-post discussion on whether “goblins” and “gremlins” are really the same thing, or if they are in fact two distinct species. All the D&D training I received in my youth can finally be brought to bear on a real-world problem!

Re:Artificial, but not intelligent

By Plugh • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

FWIW, this Nobel Laureate (Hinton) disagrees with you about consciousness. Maybe you should be less certain about your credences.

Anyway, there was some discussion about the Goblin Problem and its relation to consciousness it in the latest Last Week in AI. Always worth a listen.

Re:I have to wonder

By gweihir • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Look at how weird, insightless, stupid, destructive, openly self-serving and destructive some humans are and then look at how many people idolize these defectives.

Hence the rather dumb part of the human race is probably never really going to stop taking AI seriously. They are simply not smart enough themselves to see the limitations.

Re:Artificial, but not intelligent

By allo • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

If they think is a purely philosophical question. As soon as their actions become indistinguishable from a thinking being, it just doesn’t matter and will evade your definitions. I mean a current reasoning model produces a long thinking trade. Is it just a sequence of tokens? Yes. Do these tokens result from 60 layers of neural network when a simple text generator needs just one? Yes. Is it thinking? Depends on your definition. At least it produces a text similar to thoughts and uses that to give better answers. The rest is people talking about soul outside of church.

South Africa’s Draft AI Policy Withdrawn Due to ‘Fictitious’ AI-Generated Citations

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot
An official in South Africa withdrew a draft of the country’s national AI policy, reports a local newspaper, “after it was found the draft policy was compiled using AI, which cited academic articles that were ‘fictitious’.”
Earlier this month, minister in the Presidency Khumbudzo Ntshavheni announced cabinet had approved the draft policy for public comment. [Ntshavheni] said the policy seeks to strengthen government’s ability to regulate and adopt AI responsibly, while fostering innovation, job creation, and skills access.
The article includes this quotes from the country’s minister of communications/digital technologies department. “This unacceptable lapse proves why vigilant human oversight over the use of artificial intelligence is critical.”

Thanks to Slashdot reader Tokolosh for sharing the article.

AI will imagine our truth and history for us

By LondoMollari • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Just wait until South Africa starts writing their history books with AI. They will be filled will references to how the land was liberated from those evil white farmers wielding assault pitchforks and replaced with ultra successful and just saints, providing today’s bountiful cornucopia of plenty.

Everything that comes out of an AI needs checking

By JoshuaZ • Score: 3 Thread
These systems are genuinely useful and can sometimes do very impressive things. But absolutely everything that comes out of them needs to be checked. I’m not sure how people don’t get this at this point. It is also particularly a big deal for something like this being produced by a major government, since they can presumably afford access to pay for the higher quality models which have lower hallucination rates (Claude in particular is better for this.). This still shouldn’t stop the humans from looking over everything, as noted by the minister in TFS, but everyone should already know this by now. How many more incidents of this sort do we need?

This is an example of irony, right?

By Krishnoid • Score: 5, Funny Thread
Just wanted to confirm, as the definition can be a little elusive.