Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Perplexity Will Open Source Its Faster Lily AI Engine For Apple Silicon
  2. Instrument Clusters Are Now Paid Extras In Two Hyundai Models
  3. Global Heating Will Hit At Least 1.8C, UN Warns, and There Are ‘No Good Outcomes’
  4. FCC Plans Robocall Scorecard to Grade Phone Companies On Spam Call Blocking
  5. 1Password Wades Into a Right-Wing Mess After Funding a Linux Project
  6. CERN Transitioning From RHEL To Debian
  7. OpenAI’s Altman Says the Use of AI is ‘Non-Negotiable’
  8. NYC Public Schools Ban AI Use Through Middle School
  9. Google Defeats US Bid to Force Ad Tech Sale
  10. Uber Is Laying Off 10% of Its Workforce
  11. FBI Probes Service Selling 153M+ Drivers Licenses
  12. Dell Stock Surges On Record Orders For AI Servers
  13. Sonos Has New Devices, a New OS, and Yes, a New App
  14. NASA Selects Blue Origin As Mars Telecommunications Network Provider
  15. LZ Experiment Sees Surprising Result In Search For Dark Matter

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Perplexity Will Open Source Its Faster Lily AI Engine For Apple Silicon

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
BrianFagioli writes:
Perplexity has built a local artificial intelligence engine designed specifically for Apple silicon and the Qwen3.6-35B-A3B model. Called Lily, the engine uses a Rust runtime and custom Metal kernels, with neither PyTorch nor MLX in its execution path. Perplexity says Lily averaged 23 percent faster prompt processing and 35 percent faster token generation than MLX-LM on an M5 Max MacBook Pro with 128GB of unified memory. Lily is more specialized than MLX-LM, which supports a much wider range of models and architectures. Perplexity says it plans to release Lily as open source, but the code is not available yet, leaving its performance claims dependent on internal testing for now.

Instrument Clusters Are Now Paid Extras In Two Hyundai Models

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
“Enshittification of car controls [is] rapidly accelerating,” writes longtime Slashdot reader sinij, pointing to a new report from Car and Driver. From the report:
Remember when iPhones used to come with free headphones and a phone charger (including the wall plug)? It didn’t feel so much like Apple giving you free goodies as it did that the company was providing you with the relevant hardware to use the device. Apple stopped including headphones and charging blocks in 2020. Now, Hyundai is pulling some of its standard hardware from the box, at least for two models.

Hyundai is charging customers extra for a driver’s display in the new Elantra generation (more specifically, the Korea-market Avante), as well as the Ioniq 3, Motor1 reported. Both models feature Pleos Connect, Hyundai’s new infotainment setup that pairs a center touchscreen with a slim 9.9-inch instrument cluster mounted above the dashboard — except where it doesn’t.

In its domestic market, the instrument cluster screen is offered as a 350,000 won ($255) option for the base trim. Not the most expensive optional extra in the world, but still kind of a slap in the face for a feature traditionally viewed as standard fare. Things are more expensive for the electric Ioniq 3. In the EV’s case, the base trim gives customers the full Tesla-screen experience, meaning if customers want the driver’s display, they’ll need to fork over the additional $5000 necessary to move up to the next-level trim. […] Hyundai plans to have the setup equipped in 20 million cars globally by the end of the decade.

Re:Or they are giving a discount…

By SteelCamel • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

What do they mean by “instrument cluster”? I’d consider the instrument cluster the thing with the speedometer, odometer, warning lights etc on it - and most of those are mandatory in most countries, so leaving it out would mean the car isn’t road legal.

Re:Or they are giving a discount…

By 93 Escort Wagon • Score: 5, Informative Thread

At least based on the photo in TFA, it appears Hyundai is doing an incredibly stupid thing and rolling all that info into the large central “infotainment” screen. If you’re the driver, by default there’s absolutely nothing straight in front of you except for bare dashboard.

Now, if you want a little pop-up display screen showing important info right in front of you, at the very top of that bare dashboard - think of it as a glorified spiritual successor to the reviled Apple Touchbar (or perhaps consider it a faux heads-up display) - they’re charging you extra.

At least it’s an option unlike Tesla

By blastard • Score: 3 Thread

They may be responding to consumer preference in that market. Plenty of people buy Teslas without instrument clusters. Adding the cluster does cost money. This isn’t like putting in seat heaters and then charging to have them functional. This is an additional component.

Should we complain that there is an up charge for fog lamps? There is the space for them on some cars, but they’re not always installed.

And think of how many car models are out there where one trim level has a tachometer and another doesn’t. They are giving the consumer choice. Get extra displays or not.

Global Heating Will Hit At Least 1.8C, UN Warns, and There Are ‘No Good Outcomes’

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Guardian:
Global heating will reach at least 1.8C under even the most optimistic future, well beyond the Paris agreement goal of 1.5C, according to a UN report that warns every fraction of temperature rise intensifies destructive extreme weather, glacier melt, ecosystem loss, and island and coastal city submersion. The report by the Nairobi-based UN Environment Program confirmed overshooting the 1.5C goal inscribed in the landmark Paris agreement of 2015 was now “unavoidable” and, despite some progress in addressing the human-caused climate crisis driven by burning fossil fuels, likely in the next few years. It said: “There are no good outcomes above 1.5C.”

Heating of up to 3C above preindustrial levels could lead to glaciers losing more than a quarter of their mass by 2100, raising sea levels by up to 13cm. Global food production could decline by up to 14% by 2050 if there are not effective strategies to adapt. Human health, water supplies, nature, cities, infrastructure and economies could all be severely damaged. Some losses would be irreversible. Many communities may have to relocate or change their livelihoods. The report said the best hope for humanity to limit damage was to adopt an “overshoot, peak and decline” pathway that required immediate and sustained greenhouse gas emissions cuts combined with steps to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.

It described the goal of net zero emissions — increasingly politically contentious in some countries — as “an essential milestone that cannot be skipped” and stressed carbon dioxide removal through steps such as establishing vast new forests must occur alongside, not as an alternative to, deep cuts in fossil pollution. Crucially, the authors of the report, titled Limiting Overshoot, said the average global temperature could be returned to 1.5C this century only if heating stayed below about 1.8C. They warned nature’s capacity to store carbon was uncertain and would shrink the more the planet heats. […] The report’s authors cited earlier work that found limiting heating to about 1.8C required global emissions to be halved by 2035. They said existing national policies were projected to lead to at least 2.3C heating, but it would still be possible to limit stay below 2C if countries delivered on net zero emissions commitments by mid-century.

Re: we’re probably gonna bust past 1.8C

By sg_oneill • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Why the fuck would you embrace pain that you can easily avoid? Jesus.

Because we have to believe there will be a future. And currently our kids are not sure there will be. And I don’t blame them. I felt the same way in the 1980s about nuclear brinkmanship. The difference, unfortunately was Reagan and Gorbachev got their shit together and hammered out a plan that everyone agreed was a good idea. I see no evidence of anything like that happening with climate change.

The thing is, its not THAT painful to make the changes. We know we can sort the energy bit with a combination of solar, wind, and with a bit of planning nuclear. We can transition to electric vehicles. We can reduce our carbon to essential plastics, chemicals, and food production. Theres things we CAN do but aren’t. It won’t save us from that 1.8c, thats a bigger more complicated project. But not making shit worse, thats entirely doable.

(Keeping in mind theres a 20-ish year lag on CO2. We’re really currently doing 1990s carbon right now.)

Re:For the smooth brains and kool aid drinkers

By Waffle Iron • Score: 4, Informative Thread

I’m old enough to remember the data before it was ‘adjusted’ to create warming trends that weren’t in the actual data from actual thermometers.

And I’m old enough to remember when it wasn’t so goddamned hot.

Re: we’re probably gonna bust past 1.8C

By Powercntrl • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

I felt the same way in the 1980s about nuclear brinkmanship. The difference, unfortunately was Reagan and Gorbachev got their shit together and hammered out a plan that everyone agreed was a good idea.

The other difference was that the consequences of a nuclear exchange were far more tangible. There was no question that even if you did survive the initial bombardments, life afterwards was absolutely going to suck. Radiation has so many awful ways it can kill you, too.

Climate change, though? Depending on your age, it might not even be a problem you’ll have to concern yourself with. Trump, for example, is most certainly going to excuse himself from this mortal coil before the shit ever gets close to hitting the fan.

Re:For the smooth brains and kool aid drinkers

By thegarbz • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

I’m old enough to remember when delusional disorder was added to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders edition IV. It describes a recurring false believe, especially when it has been debunked over and over again such as the so called “adjustment to create warming trends”

Congrats my friend, you officially have a mental illness.

Re:I thought

By Anonymous Coward • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Trump said it’s all fake?

That’s probably the best indicator yet that it is in fact true.

FCC Plans Robocall Scorecard to Grade Phone Companies On Spam Call Blocking

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
The FCC is proposing (PDF) a public “robocall mitigation scorecard” that would grade phone companies on how well they block illegal spam calls while avoiding false positives on the legitimate ones. “The Scorecard will empower consumers and encourage providers to continue to combat illegal robocalls by providing the public with an assessment of the effectiveness of voice service providers’ efforts to protect consumers from illegal robocalls,” the FCC Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau said in a public notice. Ars Technica reports:
The scorecards could include call-blocking statistics along with data on customer complaints and enforcement actions. The FCC said scorecards could grade providers on a number scale, with letter grades, or by classifying providers as low risk, medium risk, or high risk. The proposed tool would rate wireless, wireline, and VoIP providers on efforts to block robocalls and their “actual results in protecting [consumers] from illegal robocalls,” the FCC said. “In practice, that means moving beyond a simple administrative checklist (i.e., did the provider file the right paperwork, did they offer the right tools) and toward a composite set of metrics that reflects both operational practices and measurable outcomes, including how often legitimate calls are blocked.”

Whether the tool is useful for consumers will depend on how it’s designed, how easy each provider’s scorecard is to find, and what data sources it relies on. The proposed scorecard would apply to domestic voice service providers with retail customers, but not telcos that operate solely as wholesale or intermediate providers. “Combatting the scourge of illegal robocalls remains the FCC’s top consumer protection priority… As proposed in today’s public notice, the FCC aims to develop a scorecard that will give consumers more information about the measures providers are taking to fight illegal robocalls, and it will also incentivize providers to improve their efforts,” FCC Chairman Brendan Carr said in a press release.

Something useful

By Anonymous Coward • Score: 3, Funny Thread

Keep it quiet everyone there’s something useful that they forgot to cancel from the Biden administration

1Password Wades Into a Right-Wing Mess After Funding a Linux Project

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
1Password is facing customer and internal employee backlash after pledging $300,000 to support a Linux distro created by David Heinemeier Hansson, who has regularly published racist and anti-immigrant rhetoric. “The popular password manager is now a 'distinguished corporate patron' of Omacom, the nonprofit foundation that oversees a popular Linux distribution known as Omarchy,” reports The Verge. From the report:
One viral blog post declared that 1Password “Supports the Ethnic Cleansing of Europe” because of the donation. Others on social media asked for suggestions for alternative password managers so they would not support the funding of a project from Heinemeier Hansson, better known as DHH. The donation has also resulted in internal pushback from employees of 1Password who are disappointed by the affiliation, The Verge has learned. 1Password CEO David Faugno and cofounder Roustem Karimov have since posted internal messages addressing what Faugno describes as “concerns, both internally and externally” that have been raised “due to the polarizing nature” of DHH.

DHH is a Danish entrepreneur best known for creating Ruby on Rails, Basecamp, and the Hey email client. Omarchy is DHH’s “opinionated” version of Linux, meaning it’s Linux the way he likes to use it. It’s based on Arch Linux, with certain apps that install by default. It’s also, apparently, one of 1Password’s big customer environments. […] In an internal Slack message obtained by The Verge, 1Password’s Karimov downplayed the overtly racist comments from DHH, telling staff the following: “As I said, people have different personal opinions. You believe in your heart that DHH is evil, that you have the moral high ground, and that nothing will change your mind. However, not everyone believes that. It is not fair to claim a monopoly and ostracize team members who might disagree with you. There are people who are afraid to speak up simply because they will be personally attacked.”

1Password CEO Faugno took a different approach, trying to reassure staff that “1Password does not endorse hateful, dehumanizing, or exclusionary views, including those shared publicly by DHH.” Nonetheless, it seems the company has sacrificed a moral position for a “mission-driven” position. In the same message to staff, Faugno says “the scale and growth of [Omarchy’s] use among our customers is significant — Omarchy has grown to be the second most used Linux distribution among 1Password users.” Faugno then tries to create distance, telling staff that its contribution is “to the Omacom Foundation, not an individual.” Still, he says “we recognize that Omarchy is associated with DHH, its founder. Our donation is not in any way an endorsement of his personal views or conduct.”

Re:Right Wing????

By garlicbread2 • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

I think this was the original cause behind all the drama
https://world.hey.com/dhh/as-i…

It’s not really right wing of course, but certain groups encourage the idea that any form of disagreement with the group think even if respectful and non aggressive needs to be squashed. This is why this post will be heavily downvoted I’d imagine.
In some cases people like to amplify the drama to gain points with like minded friends in groups to drum up emotions.
It’s a type of behaviour encouraged over time via social media similar to schoolyard bullying

In the above blog post it’s highlighting some of the impact the current immigration policies have had on western nations.
Being a Brit myself and seeing things first hand within Birmingham, part of what defines a culture is the set of rules you live by and are raised by within your family, but the rules people from less developed countries follow tends to be more similar to the rules western cultures followed several hundred years ago.
As an example, cast systems such as lower middle upper class’s, or male ownership of females, non acceptance of alternative sexualities etc. This in turn creates friction if people arriving want to keep they’re existing ways and take over instead of adapting, since it means going back to the old rules or even rules that lead to the natives determent.

There is only one secure password manager

By Anonymous Coward • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Post-it®

Re: Just typical Partisan bullshit

By drinkypoo • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Hahajhahahhaahhahahahhahahah

You think leftists don’t want to debate you because THEIR ideas don’t hold up? Clown shit.

Re:Always direct quote when your story is about wh

By spitzak • Score: 5, Informative Thread

From Wikipedia, judge for yourself. You are right it would have been nice to include this in the summary!

In 2025, Hansson published a blog post[30] expressing support for far-right British activist Tommy Robinson and the 2025 British anti-immigration protests, as well as mourning that London is “no lounger full of native Brits”, defining “native Brit” to mean white. Hansson published another blog post[34] in July of 2026 comparing the Romani population of Copenhagen to Denmark’s struggles with its wolf population growth, stating that “When wolves get out of control, you shoot them. When gypsies take over public spaces, you deport them.” Anil Dash and Rebecca Bailey expressed criticism of Hansson’s post, decrying its “dehumanizing rhetoric” against the Romani people.[35][36]

Re:Right Wing????

By kertaamo • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Interesting. I’m a Brit, born in London. What DHH has said there is something I hear all the time. Not just from Brits but from friends in Europe who come back from holidays in London. I don’t know how people twist observations and discontent at watching ones culture being destroyed into racism.

CERN Transitioning From RHEL To Debian

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Longtime Slashdot reader Microsplat:
CERN plans to have all 2,200+ industrial computers and embedded systems in its accelerator-control infrastructure running Debian 13 by the end of 2026. These are systems used for accelerator control, laboratory equipment and other operational functions … They also generate and interact with a hefty amount of data, although this Linux.com article refers more broadly to CERN’s computing infrastructure. It’s unclear whether the Debian migration covers all server infrastructure or what scientific-research-based systems are included. Our shops have done much the same in recent years, mostly due to CentOS and CFEngine getting the can.
Phoronix adds some additional context in its article: CERN was a longtime RHEL/CentOS shop, previously co-maintained the Scientific Linux RHEL derivative, moved to CentOS in 2015, and later considered CentOS Stream. CERN says Red Hat’s adoption of the "-march=x86-64-v2” compiler flag by default, which it viewed as “forced obsolescence” of older hardware, was the “straw that broke the camel’s back.”

Rocky Linux

By KermodeBear • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

I’m a bit surprised they didn’t go for Rocky Linux. Nothing wrong with Debian, mind, but Rocky is downstream from CentOS/RHEL and would be an easier migration.

“I never thought I’d see a Resonance Cascade, let

By Joe_Dragon • Score: 4, Funny Thread

“I never thought I’d see a Resonance Cascade, let alone create one…”

RHEL versus Debian philosophy?

By ctilsie242 • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

With RHEL 10 adding more complex stuff like Lightspeed and immutable kernels, it is starting to have a lot more moving parts. RHEL used to be the production choice, but as time went on, there is a lot of oddball stuff, and oddball decisions made. For example, even though Fedora has btrfs, RHEL doesn’t have btrfs, even as a -supported- option. (Yes, you can slap ZFS on it, but supported is the big thing).

Debian, on the other hand, doesn’t have snaps, flatpaks, or other subsystems present by default. It “just works” out of the box. Plus, other systems like Proxmox can be installed on vanilla Debian with ease.

I would assert that because that fewer moving parts are needed, it makes things easier. You can take filesystem snapshots without Stratis, for example.

It’s a treadmill

By BentMetal • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
On the stated “straw that broke the camel’s back” for CPU architecture:-

RHEL 8 / Rocky 8 just needs x86-64-v1, which is really old and is essentially all 64-bit x86 CPUs
RHEL 9 / Rocky 9 requires x86-64-v2 (if you’re on x86), and I understand it’s supported until 2032 - if that featured in their decision
RHEL 10 / Rocky 10 requires x86-64-v3 (see https://docs.rockylinux.org/10… ) and can make 2013-era Xeons obsolete.

I’ve an older Dell R720 server that can’t run RHEL 10/ Rocky10 on bare metal, but it’s still quite functional otherwise. So I suppose it comes down to what hardware CERN have available and want to keep operational, whilst using the same OS across the whole campus.
If interested, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… has more details on the CPU levels.

And I’ll note for completeness that like Debian, AlmaLinux still only requires x86-64-v1, so CERN did have the option of an “almost clone” of RHEL.

Re:It’s a treadmill

By Anonymous Coward • Score: 4, Informative Thread

New Intel Elkhart Lake CPUs without x86-64-v3 and AVX2 were still being introduced as recently as 2023!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…

OpenAI’s Altman Says the Use of AI is ‘Non-Negotiable’

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said AI adoption is “non-negotiable” for countries, comparing rejecting it to refusing electricity a century ago and predicting it will unleash an unprecedented boom in entrepreneurship. “The economic growth and benefit to people that can come from this, the value to a country, is too high to ignore,” he said. His comments were made during a fireside chat with U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick at the G20 Innovation Ministerial in Chapel Hill, North Carolina. CNBC reports:
Altman thinks the public won’t be talking as much about AI a decade from now — it’ll be expected everywhere. “A kid growing up today will never be smarter than AI, but he or she will also never have understood a world where every product and service that they interact with is not really smart and really capable and really helpful,” he said.

Altman referenced the adoption of electricity multiple times in his comments and drew a line between that and AI. “I think it would be approximately as bad of an idea to say we’re not going to have AI in our country as it was to say we’re not going to have electricity in our country, you know, back 100 plus years ago,” he said.

Altman called cybersecurity one of the biggest challenges to navigate in the age of AI and one that leaders shouldn’t sidestep. “I think some things are going to go very wrong with cybersecurity unless people act quite urgently,” he said. Altman said that falling short in cyber defense and other areas “could set this technology back a great deal.”
You can watch a recording of the chat on YouTube.

Totally unbiased statement

By wed128 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
“The use of the snake oil I’m selling is non-negotiable” — Sam Altman

Re:Totally unbiased statement

By robot5x • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

“Rupert Murdoch says watching Fox News is ‘Non-Negotiable’"

Do we really need a Slashdot story on every single fucking mention of AI anywhere in the universe?? Nowadays it’s less ‘news for nerds’ and more recycling the same thin talking points so zealots on both sides can just argue as much as possible and inevitably end up insulting rsilvergun along with a history of all their posts.

AI is mandatory, vaccines are optional

By Required Snark • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
One is pure hype and the other is pure science.

We’re screwed.

Re:Same Altman: Snake Oil Salesman

By dfghjk • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

There will always be improvements, but AI is fundamentally more sociopathic than the worst human on the planet. That will not change because sociopaths control it.

Will AI be “worth the price” when deaths are part of the price? It’s coming.

It’s been 4 years! Where’s the entrepreneurship??

By Somervillain • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said AI adoption is “non-negotiable” for countries, comparing rejecting it to refusing electricity a century ago and predicting it will unleash an unprecedented boom in entrepreneurship.

You’ve been out for 4 years! Where is all the entrepreneurship? Where are all the startups leveraging AI to take over existing non-AI industries? There were several major startups revolutionizing non-computing segments of the business world 4 years after the introduction of commercial internet (1999)…as well as the iPhone (2011). All I hear about are pick and shovel vendors making money off FOMO. Every business who invests in AI is unsure if it’s saving them money.

To date, I can say AI has accomplished the following:

1. Given AI-is-my-religion zealots a cool toy to play with and dream about a future whenever this shit starts actually working
2. Made money for a half dozen players in a circular economy ponzi scheme
3. Been used to AI-wash layoffs without any evidence and suppress wages, masking big tech’s challenges with rising interest rates.
4. Made the cost of devices we want and actually use skyrocket.

AI has made the future pretty bleak, personally. It doesn’t work and is causing a RAMpocalypse…and if it ever actually does, it will cause a white-collar-jobpocalypse and massive social unrest. However, don’t take my word for it.

After 4 years, Steve Jobs didn’t have to go on press tours to convince people of the utility of an iPhone. No one had to sell the internet as a useful thing in 1999. The fact that Sam Altman has to sell his ware so hard shows even he’s not confident about his product. We’ve all used ChatGPT Sam…We know what it is. We weren’t impressed enough to pay for your massive investment to build it.

NYC Public Schools Ban AI Use Through Middle School

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
New York City Public Schools is banning generative AI for students from pre-K through eighth grade for the 2026-27 school year, affecting more than half a million students in the nation’s largest school district. ABC News reports:
In a statement to ABC News, New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani said that the city is implementing a moratorium on generative AI for students in pre-school or 2-K through eighth grade and will spend the next year “studying the impacts of this technology.” Mamdani wrote in part, “the tech industry wants us to believe that A.I.-powered early education is not only inevitable, but necessary.” “We do not see it that way,” he added.

[…] The district said it is implementing the most expansive AI moratorium in the nation, eliminating software that uses student-facing AI and banning companion chatbots. The city’s AI moratorium does not apply to high school students. The district said it will offer twice-yearly AI literacy classes designed to help high school students “think critically” about the technology before they start to “rely” on it.

Good

By awwshit • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I think for schools AI is kind of like digital clocks or calculators. You need to learn the basics before you automate the basics.

Re:Good

By OrangeTide • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

If no human being interacts with AI until age 20, what is the harm? We know this already works.

The burden of proof is on those who want to change the current status quo.

Re:Good

By Fly Swatter • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
But there is data just for having computers. They don’t help in the early years and only add distraction and harmful shortcuts.

No one asked, but I don’t think this ban goes far enough because it stops at ‘AI’. It should include computers in anything but computer class. Oh and phones.

Re:Good

By Touvan • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Agreed - but this is the wrong target. They should ban computers and “smart” devices entirely, not just AI. Books and hand written tests/homework. Like you said, we already know this works.

Ah the romanticized 1960s / 70s

By drnb • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

If no human being interacts with AI until age 20, what is the harm?

Possibly producing another generation that has an even greater desire to vote for the party that wants to roll things back to some romanticized version of the past?.

True, the radical 1960s/70s is inaccurately romanticized. While the real protesters just wanted to see Civil Rights attained and the Vietnam War end, the self styled socialist revolutionaries and radicals crossed the line in arson, assassination, bombings, etc. They really were marxist and maoist inspired domestic terrorists who wanted to tear down the USA and build a communist order. Not my opinion, they admitted this, Weatherman, etc. After Vietnam ended they lost support, were very upset student were no longer rallying to their revolutionary cause, and decided to attack the system from the inside. In particular to enter academia and train the next generation of revolutionaries to undermine the system from the inside. Today we are seeing the fruits of their labors.

Google Defeats US Bid to Force Ad Tech Sale

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Reuters:
Alphabet’s Google escaped a breakup of its advertising technology business on Wednesday, when a judge in Virginia rejected U.S. antitrust enforcers’ bid to force a sale of Google’s online advertising exchange. While the ad exchange is a small part of Google’s business, the ruling is the second powerful symbolic victory against the U.S. Department of Justice in its efforts to force Google to sell assets to address illegal monopolies. U.S. Judge Leonie Brinkema in Alexandria, Virginia, declined to make Google sell AdX, where publishers pay Google a 20% fee to sell ads in auctions that happen instantly when users load websites. She accepted most of the parties’ proposed behavioral remedies.

The DOJ and a broad coalition of states sued Google in 2023 over its dominance in markets for advertising technology used by online publishers and websites. In April 2025, Brinkema ruled that Google holds illegal monopolies on servers that host publisher ads and ad exchanges which sit between buyers and sellers. Google unlawfully locked publishers on its ad server into using its AdX, the judge found. The tech giant’s anticompetitive conduct “substantially harmed Google’s publisher customers, the competitive process, and, ultimately, consumers of information on the open web,” Brinkema said at the time.

At a trial last year on remedies in the case, the DOJ argued that Google cannot be trusted to run AdX, given its past behavior. Google argued that a forced sale would be technically difficult and result in a long and painful transition that would hurt customers. During the remedies trial, Google’s lawyers warned that forcing it to sell parts of its ad-tech business would cause disruption and damage. […] The ruling is the third time in a row that a judge has rejected a bid by U.S. antitrust enforcers to break up Big Tech in a crackdown that started during President Donald Trump’s first term. In another major Google antitrust case, a judge similarly rejected the DOJ’s push to force Google to sell Chrome. It is likely to fuel questions about whether courts are up to the task of checking the industry’s unprecedented power over the U.S. economy.

We Need to Strengthen Our Anti-Trust Laws

By machineghost • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

It’s insane that the judge ruled this way, but it’s not his fault: the law is ancient and terrible.

There’s a good chance we’re going to have a very different Congress next year: lets pressure them to strengthen anti-trust law.

Ummm

By CEC-P • Score: 3 Thread
Was their argument actually that Youtube and Google search would then be ripped off on pricing by the new ad company because they’d have a monopoly?

Re:We Need to Strengthen Our Anti-Trust Laws

By PPH • Score: 4, Funny Thread

So, she’s ancient and terrible too.

Uber Is Laying Off 10% of Its Workforce

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Uber is laying off about 3,300 employees, or roughly 10% of its workforce, as part of a restructuring aimed at cutting management layers and redirecting investment toward ridesharing, delivery, and robotaxis. CEO Dara Khosrowshahi announced the changes in an internal email that was also published online.TechCrunch reports:
According to the email, the layoffs are part of a restructuring exercise that would shrink the number of managers by 20%, and some personnel in these roles would work as individual contributors going forward.

The ridesharing giant is reducing the number of teams with one or two members by 50%, and letting go staff who are “more than seven layers down from the CEO,” per Bloomberg. Khosrowshahi’s email said the company is combining its engineering, science, and delivery divisions. The company is also bringing together its delivery operations across restaurants, retail, and direct divisions.

Remote jobs at the company are going away, too, with Uber only allowing less than 1% of its staff to work remotely.

We’ve built the company....

By Puls4r • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
And now it’s time to get rid of the builders and only keep the maintainers so we can turn a short term profit. Woooooo Investors.

The Zuck school of management

By sinkskinkshrieks • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Round-after-round of layoffs to pause raises (suppressing wages) and demoralize remaining workers with maximum stress in order to do another stock buyback. Stock buybacks used to be illegal because they’re a form of stock manipulation from the Securities Exchange Act (SEA) of 1934 until repealed by SEC’s Rule 10b-18 under Reagan in 1982.

They have that many employees?

By sentiblue • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
Wow, I had no idea they were that big.. I’m guessing the infrastructure/application are stable enough that some jobs can be let go. Plus some of the jobs can truly be replaced by AI.

Are they making anything?

By Cyberax • Score: 3 Thread
Are they making anything, anyway? Their food delivery website is a disaster, and it’s been getting worse. The ride-hailing app has also not changed in years.

FBI Probes Service Selling 153M+ Drivers Licenses

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
A dark-web identity theft service called Nexus claims to be selling scans of more than 153 million U.S. and Canadian driver’s licenses, along with millions of other identity documents. “Based on interviews with individuals whose licenses are available for purchase through the service, it appears to be siphoning images collected by a widely used Louisiana-based identity verification company,” reports KrebsOnSecurity. The outlet also reports that the FBI’s New Orleans field office has launched an official inquiry into the source of the images. From the report:
On Monday, Aug. 31, a source alerted KrebsOnSecurity to a service advertised by a new user on the Russian cybercrime forum Exploit, offering access to digital scans of identity documents on more than 170 million people in North America. The source brought it to my attention because the proprietor of this identity theft service offered my Virginia drivers license as a free sample in their initial sales thread on Exploit. The service, dubbed Nexus, claims to have more than 153 million drivers licenses for people in the United States and Canada, as well as more than 10 million identification cards; more than three million travel documents and/or international IDs; and at least 579,000 medical cards.

[…] The people behind Nexus claim the license images are coming from an active breach at “a major identity verification company” whose customers include multiple Fortune 500 companies. “We have been continuously exfiltrating new data for over a year into our private database,” the service enthused in its introductory post on Exploit. “Records are available to preview before purchase with pertinent information redacted. Customer photos are displayed if available.” Indeed, over the past 24 hours, the number of drivers license records listed as available in Nexus has increased by nearly 400,000, suggesting that freshly stolen license data is being harvested and uploaded to this service on a semi-regular basis.
KrebsOnSecurity traced the apparent source by comparing timestamps on stolen license images with when their owners had their IDs scanned, including at Hertz rental counters and a Planet13 dispensary. Both companies use identity-verification services from Louisiana-based idscan.net, whose technology also scans IDs using infrared and ultraviolet light.
Since the story was published, Krebs reports that the Nexus identity theft service website “vanished from the darkweb, replacing its login page with a plain text message that reads, ‘This service is no longer available.’"

In A Surpise To Only The Stupidest Of People

By SlashbotAgent • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The KYC verified identities are leaking exactly was expected.

The present age verification laws are creating FAR more problems than they solve.

This will come as a surprise only to the stupidest and most moronic people around. A cohort that vastly outnumbers the rest.

Re:In A Surpise To Only The Stupidest Of People

By justMichael • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

including at Hertz rental counters and a Planet13 dispensary

These are not online age verifications, the dispensary may be age related, but it’s also residency so they know how much you can purchase, Hertz on the other hand is not going to rent you a car if you don’t have a valid license.

Holy crap!

By jenningsthecat • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

170 million? That’s fairly close to being half of the combined population of USA and Canada!

When you adjust for the people who don’t have driving licences, that would seem to be pretty close to the total number of legal drivers in the two countries. Ouch!

“Selling” isn’t the root problem

By pla • Score: 5, Informative Thread
Oh, goody, the website selling our licenses is down. Whelp, toothpaste back in the tube, we can all rest easy knowing that the day is saved!

Of course, the next obvious step if they can’t sell them is to simply release the entire batch into the wild. And how dare any of you think this might somehow be the fault of sweet innocent idscan.net for inadequately protecting the highly sensitive data they were grudgingly entrusted with in the first place.

We need a hell of a lot more CEOs in prison, and we need any politicians that requires / supports / allows this bullshit to join them. Of course, absolutely none of that is going to happen because Joe Sixpack has zero clue any of this is going on; and even if he somehow catches wind of it from a Facebook meme, oh well, it’s just one more breach, who cares, he gets notices of those on a monthly basis and has been intentionally trained to treat them as junk mail.

This is why

By nehumanuscrede • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

This right here is why people are so adamantly against giving websites a copy of their ID card
to prove their age.

These vendors then become priority targets for ID theft since the laws, as currently written, do
not force them to take security of said data very seriously. When there is a breach, the company
gets a slap on the wrist, a laughable fine and then it’s right back to business as usual.

In the meantime, everyone who gave their ID to said company is now on the hook for potential
ID thieves and the nightmare that goes with it should they draw the short straw.

Before we implement any sort of mandatory age verification that requires your ID going into any
sort of digital online storage, the laws need to be rewritten to make the financial penalties so painful,
that the company in question will find it cheaper to simply do security the right way the first time.

Dell Stock Surges On Record Orders For AI Servers

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Dell reported record fiscal Q2 results as AI server demand surged, booking $60.9 billion in AI server orders and ending the quarter with a $95 billion backlog. From a report:
The company posted record revenue of $47 billion, up 58% year over year. Earnings per share came in at $6.34, up 273% from a year ago. Adjusted earnings rose 203% to $7.04 per share.

“With AI momentum accelerating and our opportunity expanding across the portfolio, we’re raising our full-year FY27 revenue outlook by $25 billion to $192 billion, up nearly 70% year over year,” said Jeff Clarke, CEO of Dell Technologies, in the company’s earnings release.

Dell has seen its orders balloon as enterprise customers adopt artificial intelligence and use AI servers locally to run agentic AI queries. Dell stock is up more than 230% year to date. Peer Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE), which also moved up 110% since the start of the year, jumped in after-hours trading.

Makes sense

By Somervillain • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Good for Dell and HP. I hope they use this windfall to strengthen their core businesses and realize that AI is a bubble that can’t pop soon enough. Obviously people will buy AI servers after the pop, AI is here to stay, but this massive surge isn’t long for the world. HP is the biggest disappointment in tech, rivaling Oracle for the least respected company in Silicon Valley, despite such a great history. They seem to do nothing well. Their printers are still good, but poisoned by a strategy of exploiting customers for toner/ink, including forcing DRM chips to ensure you spent $400 for a set of toner cartridges when they’re available 3rd party for about $60 now. HP computers? fuck that…they’re overpriced and mostly suck…occasionally I’ll notice a well built laptop from them, but it almost seems like an accident.

Dell is also just very disappointing to me. I always thought they’d be better than they are today. Their monitors are good and their offerings are OK…but they never seem to compete with the leaders. They have the resources to compete and take on Apple, but they don’t bother. They let Apple eat their lunch in the business world. From what I know, few companies ever gave out apple laptops 15+ years ago. Now in my area, most serious software companies give out macbook pros and even many businesses are doing it now for regular office workers.

I switched over to Mac 10 years ago from desktop Linux and am happy with it. I switched to the Apple ecosystem 5 years ago…all my devices will be coming from Apple for the next few years, but....fuck if I wish there were good alternatives. I with it was a hard choice. I wish Dell offered something 90% as good for 75% of the cost, like they used to 15 years ago. Now it’s like 75% as good for 90% of the cost.

No matter who I buy from, competition is good. I want Apple to earn my dollars, not win by default like they’re doing today. Also, Apple isn’t really a business hardware company. They sell luxury products that are good at business tasks…mostly because the business players fell asleep at the wheel and are selling you laptops that are nearly the same as they were 20 years ago, only without removable batteries. The world needs a serious business computing provider. Dell could easily be that, but they just don’t seem interested in being anything beyond mediocre.

I preferred it when Apple computing products were an indulgence and not the only (serious) game in town.

Corruption has nothing to do with this. Nothing.

By Required Snark • Score: 3 Thread
Dell wins a $9.7 billion Pentagon software deal after donating to Trump accounts.

Sonos Has New Devices, a New OS, and Yes, a New App

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Wired:
Sonos has a new app. Stop me if you’ve heard this one before. The smart speaker company, long a darling of the audio industry, undid much of the goodwill it earned with its multiroom speakers through a bevy of software updates that broke its app in 2024. Almost all app users hated it, citing the loss of features like volume control and accessibility tools meant to help blind people use the wireless speaker system. Sonos eventually owned up to the mistake, considered bringing back the old app again, then booted its CEO and marched its new leaders out to apologize profusely to win back the company’s furious customers.

Now, Sonos says it has a brand-new app update, infused with lots of generative AI features. The company also announced a new soundbar and its second pair of over-the-ear headphones. Sonos representatives say it doesn’t want to be seen as a speaker company anymore, but as something bigger and more holistic. “For years people have been seeing us as a speaker company,” says Brandon Holley, the interim hardware lead at Sonos. “What we actually are is an audio operating system.” The company is calling that operating system Sonos 27, and it manifests in a few ways.

[…] This is a lot of change for Sonos, something the company hasn’t always handled gracefully. Sonos’ home systems already aren’t the easiest to set up, sometimes requiring separate apps for older products. The company may be rejiggering itself as an “audio operating system,” but its software has long been the source of its troubles with getting its products to work right. Will AI smarts fix that? Maybe for its newer devices. But anyone with an existing system may still struggle. The AI features on products and in the Sonos 27 app will be opt-in, meaning you can avoid them entirely. “That really is our new approach to our app release,” Patel says. “We’re going to bring our customers along. We’re going to listen more.” That would be a good plan. Sounds like Sonos’ speakers will be listening more, too.
Sonos is emphasizing a more “customer-centric feedback listening approach” after the backlash to its previous redesign. Improvements include easier tab navigation, better room sorting, revamped volume controls, and new system-health tools for diagnosing connection problems.
The centerpiece is Sonos 27voice, a generative AI voice assistant that can handle conversational music requests, connect with services like ChatGPT through Model Context Protocol, and power customizable “Sonos Custom Agents” for tasks such as automatically activating certain speakers. “Obviously AI is something that’s very hot these days,” Sonos software VP Sid Patel said. “So we have integrated various pieces of AI into our system.” However, the features will only work with the newer S2 app, and Sonos cautions that “not every product will support every new feature,” with detailed compatibility information coming later.

Sonos is also branding its multiroom networking technology Sonos Fabric, which what Patel calls “the magic that has existed for what Sonos was built on.” New Fabric features include portable surround, which lets users temporarily move speakers between rooms and have them automatically configure themselves for surround sound, and Headphone Linking, which lets users seamlessly switch audio between Sonos speakers and headphones.

Yeah no

By AcidFnTonic • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Yeah no. Watched my friend get bitten by this company. Never again. You dont return to abusive relationships. Everything has changed baby they sayâ¦. Yeah then you get smacked again and others will mock you for going back because there was prior evidence of the abuse.

Re:New and improved VENDOR LOCK IN!!!!!

By Slashvertisment • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
I see it less as a Slashvertisment and more of a Slashwarning.

Doubling down

By red_dragon • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Sonos eventually owned up to the mistake, considered bringing back the old app again, then booted its CEO and marched its new leaders out to apologize profusely to win back the company’s furious customers.
Now, Sonos says it has a brand-new app update, infused with lots of generative AI features.

So, instead of bringing back the things that customers wanted, they doubled down on shoving what nobody asked for. LOL. LMAO, even.

A load of bullshit

By dutt • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Having a Sonos system at home with 20 speakers, I’m sticking with the old S1 app and not adding any new speakers that require another app. All the issues that have been reported with the new app is a top of the iceberg of issues that they’ve created for us customers. Ultimately they want to drive more Sonos speaker sales by only having the newer speakers run with the latest app version.

The Ai fluff in this new app will hardly add the functionality that is truly needed. The most important part is sound quality and app reliability. You don’t want a spinning app when wanting to turn down the volume or searching for a song. The new functionality with Ai functions added will not fix the fundamentals, but require the latest speakers that are only compatible with the newer S2 app. This is another marketing gimmick to drive more speaker sales.

Out of touch much?

By Voyager529 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

“For years people have been seeing us as a speaker company,”

Yes Brandon, this is the thing that people generally like. When the speakers work, they sound very good.

“What we actually are is an audio operating system.” …And this is the part that has been somewhere between tolerable and the biggest liability. Yes, when it works, it’s great, but it’s been so focused on being “automagic” that when there’s a problem, it’s like a Bugatti hitting a speed bump.

If Sonos wanted to claw back some good will, all they had to do was to implement a “generic Bluetooth mode” and an aux jack. This way, it ensures people can still use the speaker (the most liked and most reliable part) irrespective of whether the software is good or bad. …But, since they’d rather cram AI into it, they’ll likely continue to bleed users and installers, who will implement Bluesound or WiiM instead and become the Oracle of multi-room audio - obscenely priced, running on an increasingly niche user base, and circling the drain for a while longer than most, but ultimately fail as more and more people consider the Sonos “operating system” radioactive.

NASA Selects Blue Origin As Mars Telecommunications Network Provider

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
NASA has awarded Blue Origin a contract worth up to $700 million to build and operate a dedicated Mars telecommunications network for current and future missions to the Red Planet. Blue Origin is expected to deliver the spacecraft by the end of 2028, with the network targeted to become operational by 2030. From a press release:
Blue Origin will design, develop, integrate, launch, and operate the network as a part of the agency’s broader space communications and navigation infrastructure. The architecture will consist of a high-performance telecommunications spacecraft orbiting Mars, transmitting science data, imagery, navigation information, and critical mission communications for spacecraft operating on and around the planet.

The award marks a milestone in NASA’s strategy to expand communications and navigation services beyond Earth and the Moon, establishing the foundation for sustained exploration of Mars in the coming decades.

Starlink

By SuperDre • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
And SpaceX will probably launch their own network too, probably even before Blue Origin has its craft ready. As SpaceX its target is also Mars, and they need to communicate with their Starships and robots, Starlink will be their comms.

Re: Merit?

By ArmoredDragon • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Blue origin is kind of the exact opposite of SpaceX — very top heavy, highly bureaucratic, little to no interest in efficiency, optimization, or cost reduction, no desire to get anything done in a timely manner. While they did land a booster, which is no small feat of engineering, it’s only a third of what makes it economically viable: They need to produce the boosters at scale and turn them around quickly after each use, and for that to make any sense they would also need to find or create an economic demand to meet that supply. Space tourism just won’t cut it unless you can get the cost much lower and do more than a ten minute suborbital microgravity flight. For the money, tourists can do way better than that without even passing the karman line, let alone going suborbital or even orbital.

Short of that, they’re going to run into exactly the same problems that NASA, the ESA, and a host of others pointed at when pooh-poohing Elon for wanting to do it (and for whatever reason, the ESA is now trying to chase after Falcon 9, will manage to replicate it 5 years after it’s already obsolete, only to find out at that time that they won’t be able to come anywhere close to replicating SpaceX’s operational costs or launch cadence.)

Re:Merit?

By Ol Olsoc • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

As much as it pains me to say it, I don’t think Blue Origin is that far behind. They just have a different methodology to SpaceX. Instead of failing fast and often while they iterate, Blue Origin does a lot of testing and then a successful launch. So it’s very hard to say exactly where they are in comparison to SpaceX, but we will find out in the next few years when they are supposed to deliver the first crewed lunar lander to NASA.

Correct, they aren’t that far behind. We have armchair engineers in here claiming that BO’s big achievement is Launching a suborbital flight with Pop Stars, that Bezos paid baksheesh to the orange shitgibbon, when they’ve already put satellites into orbit on New Glenn rockets.

This is how the system is supposed to run, with multiple vendors. BO is on their learning curve.

Re:Barely making it to the Kármán Line

By nightflameauto • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

“Wonder what their competitive edge was over other applications besides the size of their legal team. " Bezos support for el Bunko.

Bezos was smart enough to be supportive from a distance. Musk’s mistake was believing he could be super-chums and not end up in an ego-battle with the current chief when they inevitably had a minor squabble. And say what you will about Donald Trump, the man can hold a grudge like it’s a sacred artifact in a holy temple. SpaceX won’t lose current contracts, but I would bet there’s a mandate hanging out there to seek alternatives first for new plans, rather than handing any more potential influence to Musk, who bruised Donald’s ego by daring to have some minor disagreements and actually state them publicly. Meanwhile, Bezos pays tribute and STFU otherwise, not bothering to jump into the thick of it, and not having one of his children telling Donald to shut up on a live web feed.

Re: Competition

By SuperDre • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
Uhh, Boeing and SpaceX both got the contract to develop a human capable capsule, but Boeing got $4.2 billion and SpaceX got $2.6 billion. Crew dragon’s first commercial flight was in 2020, Starliner still hasn’t flown a commercial flight, and might even be cancelled alltogether, as ut was meant for ISS.

LZ Experiment Sees Surprising Result In Search For Dark Matter

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot
New submitter greytree shares a report from Brown University:
LUX-ZEPLIN, an experiment co-led by Brown University faculty and students, observed a particle interaction that could be interpreted as a signal from WIMPs, a dark matter candidate — but researchers need more data to confirm. […] The result does not yet meet the statistical threshold required to claim a discovery, but it is the most compelling hint of dark matter reported by the experiment to date. “We’re very intrigued to see this event in the data, in the region where we expect dark matter to show up, and the competing backgrounds are very low,” said Rick Gaitskell, a professor of physics at Brown University and the spokesperson for LZ. “With only one event, we don’t want to get ahead of ourselves. We are not claiming to have seen dark matter. But we have seen something interesting that we want to share with the scientific community for their input.” […]

If the anomalous event was caused by dark matter, the WIMP that generated it would likely have a mass of at least 200 GeV/c2 (gigaelectronvolts), or more than 200 times the mass of a proton. The LZ results have not reached “5-sigma” significance, the statistical threshold in physics that an event must reach to be considered a discovery. The new analysis is 2.6 sigma, meaning there is approximately a 0.5% chance that the event could be explained by known backgrounds. With additional data, researchers can test whether the finding continues to grow in significance or fades away. LZ has already accumulated the world’s largest dark matter dataset and will continue to accrue WIMP search data at SURF, substantially improving their search statistics.

JiJi Fan, an associate professor of physics at Brown not involved in the LZ experimental research but whose theoretical work is cited in the new LZ paper, said the new findings were “very intriguing.” While the event recorded by LZ could not have been the simplest type of WIMP interaction, there are other types of possible interactions that could explain it, she said. Had a WIMP interacted in the simplest way at the high energy associated with this recent event, the detector would have recorded many recoil events at lower energies following the initial event. LZ recorded a single event, however, which requires an expanded theoretical explanation. “There are well-motivated theoretical extensions, including inelastic scattering and momentum-dependent elastic scattering, that could potentially account for this single event,” Fan said. “This also sets up a target for on-going dark matter hunting, not only at direct detection experiments such as LZ but also at other complementary experimental frontiers.”
The results were presented in a scientific talk at the 2026 TeV Particle Astrophysics conference in Japan on Tuesday, Sept. 1. A paper detailing the finding can be found here (PDF).

Derivation of the Radial Acceleration Relation

By little1973 • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

The RAR equation is an empirical equation based on 100+ galaxies data. No derivation of the equation exists.

I have an elastic vacuum model from which I derived the exact equation. The interpretation is that RAR (and MOND) describers the transient
region how cosmic expansion recovers from H=0 inside the galaxy to full H=H0. Within the elastic vacuum model the RAR equation is a prediction.

You can read the Postulates and you can jump right into chapter 9 and read also the Appendinx. You do not have to concern yourself with the GR stuff in the document.

At this point, I see 3 options.
1. The derivation is false and I use totally wrong math
2. I am extremely lucky to get this out of the vacuum model and it is just a weird coincidence
3. Maybe there is something here and treating the vacuum as a real material may have some merit.

https://www.researchgate.net/p…

If any physicist read this, feel free to contact me and point out any errors and/or inconsistencies concerning the derivation or other topics in the document.

Re:Derivation of the Radial Acceleration Relation

By ffkom • Score: 4, Funny Thread
I wonder if Lempel, Ziv, and Roshal appreciate their legendary abbreviations “LZ” and “RAR” being diluted by some obscure dark matter research :-)

Re:I know its not an original idea

By Sique • Score: 4, Informative Thread
To be frank, physicists have a whole list of things it can’t be, because otherwise, they would be able to see the effects of it. This is a common misconception, to confuse not knowing what it is with knowing what it is not.

And they can rule out interaction of Dark Matter with itself on a large scale of magnitudes, e.g. everything above the Weak Force.

JiJi Fan and the SURF WIMPs

By almitydave • Score: 3 Thread

JiJi Fan and the Surf Wimps used to be my favorite band. Some say that they stopped performing because they just ran out of energy, but the actual circumstances leading to their departure from the public eye are a dark matter indeed.

2.6 sigma = Yawn

By cosmicl • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
This proponents are working in a tough competitive field. The threshold for discovery is 5 sigma. Informal threshold for claiming a “hint” of something is 3 sigma. For fun, search up “particle physics papers with results less than 3 sigma.