Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Microsoft Abandons UK AI Supercomputer As Grid Struggles to Keep Up
  2. Japan Launches Historic MMX Sample-Return Mission to Mars’ Moon Phobos
  3. Amazon To Fund 12 Small Nuclear Reactors At Former Indiana Coal Plant
  4. Professor Calls To Abolish Business Schools For Failing Society
  5. TP-Link Moves to Assemble Routers In the US Following Import Ban
  6. Trump DHS Officials Asked CISA To Secretly Aquire and Hack a Voting Machine
  7. A Hacker Broke Into John Deere, SharkNinja With an Army of AI Agents
  8. Apple Announces October 28 ‘Pro and Tell’ Event
  9. Florida DMV Hacked After Police Dept Insecurely Stored Login Info
  10. Elon Musk Vows To Give a SpaceX Share To ‘Every Kid In America’
  11. Wine Ported to OpenBSD
  12. Elizabeth Holmes Doc ‘You Can See Everything’ Shocks With Massive Opening
  13. America Tries Reviving Shuttered Nuclear Plants - Partly to Help Power Data Centers
  14. Mozilla is Calling Out Microsoft for Forcing Edge on Users
  15. Anthropic Announces ‘Public Benefit Fund’, Committing 5% of Its Shares

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Microsoft Abandons UK AI Supercomputer As Grid Struggles to Keep Up

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Microsoft has reportedly abandoned plans to serve as the anchor customer for Britain’s largest proposed AI supercomputer after learning that the project’s Essex data center might not receive sufficient grid power until the early to mid-2030s. “Its departure leaves Nscale without a publicly announced customer for the site, although the neocloud insists the project is still going ahead,” reports The Register. From the report:
When the deal was announced in September 2025, the plan was to pack 23,040 Nvidia GB300 GPUs into a 50MW facility, with room to expand to 90MW. Microsoft would use the computing power for its Azure cloud services, with the first chips expected in early 2027. One important detail remained: how to power it.

As The Guardian reported last month, UK Power Networks warned Nscale that the grid capacity needed might not be available until the 2030s. A UK Power Networks spokesperson told The Register it could not discuss individual connections due to obligations under Section 105 of the Utilities Act. “However, in general, many datacenters, whilst they can connect to our distribution network, are awaiting works on the national transmission network which we do not own,” the spokesperson said.

Nscale, meanwhile, isn’t letting the small matter of losing its biggest customer dampen its enthusiasm. “We remain committed to both the Loughton project and the UK and we are exploring alternative power sources for the site, in addition to other expansion sites in the UK. Our relationship with Microsoft remains strong and long-term, and this unfortunate London-wide grid issue has no impact on our other contracts,” Nscale told The Register.

Japan Launches Historic MMX Sample-Return Mission to Mars’ Moon Phobos

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Japan has successfully launched its Martian Moons eXploration (MMX) mission to study Mars’ two moons, Phobos and Deimos. Scheduled to arrive in August 2027, “MMX will become the first spacecraft to land on and return samples from Phobos for study back on Earth, which scientists think could shed light on a decades-old mystery about the moons’ origins” and resolve whether they were formed from a giant impact or were captured asteroids, reports Space.com. From the report:
It was the 10th liftoff of Japan’s expendable, two-stage H3 rocket, which was jointly developed by JAXA and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries. After clearing its launch pad today, the 207-foot-tall (63 meters) launch vehicle flew a nominal trajectory through its ascent corridor over the Pacific Ocean, jettisoning its four solid boosters in pairs just before the flight clock reached two minutes. The rocket shed its payload fairings about one minute and 20 seconds later, exposing MMX to the vacuum of space for the first time. […] MMX is now under its own power, and on course for Mars.

The interplanetary transit will last about 10 months, with the spacecraft scheduled to arrive at the Red Planet in August 2027. When it does, MMX’s propulsion module will execute an orbital insertion burn to place itself in a quasi-satellite orbit (QSO) around Phobos, which places MMX within the space around the moon as both circle Mars. MMX will spend about three years in the Martian system, devoting much of that time to studying the 14-mile-wide (22 km) Phobos with its science instruments. The spacecraft also carries the IDEFIX rover, a joint effort of the space agencies of France and Germany, which is scheduled to deploy to the surface of Phobos in late 2028 or early 2029.

After a mapping campaign to select suitable landing sites, MMX will perform two separate touchdowns on Phobos to collect and stow samples in the spacecraft’s return capsule. Following its second landing and sample collection, MMX will briefly return to QSO with Phobos before transferring to a more elongated orbit around Mars that intersects with the planet’s smaller moon, Deimos, which is just 8 miles (14 km) in diameter. During the last several months of its time around Mars, MMX will perform a series of Deimos flybys before departing for Earth in November 2030. If all goes according to plan, the MMX sample-return capsule will land in Australia in 2031.
You can watch a recording of the launch on YouTube.

Sorry to say it, but MMX will fail

By backslashdot • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

What if the conditions on Phobos require it to float at various points? MMX can’t do floating at any point, and so they’ll have to wait for the American Micro Devices that can do it and copy that and SSEnd those instead.

Too late ?

By greytree • • Score: 4, Informative • Thread
It now be called the MMXXVI probe, shurely ?

Amazon To Fund 12 Small Nuclear Reactors At Former Indiana Coal Plant

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from TechCrunch:
Amazon is funding development of a proposed 960-megawatt nuclear plant in Indiana and would be the first customer to buy its power, the companies announced Monday. Utility company American Electric Power (AEP) would operate the plant. X-energy, which designs small modular nuclear reactors and went public in April, would supply the reactors. The new power plant would consist of 12 Xe-100 small modular reactors and be located on the site of a demolished coal power plant just south of Terre Haute. The deal is the second commercial agreement between Amazon and X-energy, and it’s three times larger than the first, which was announced two years ago.

Amazon has invested heavily in X-energy, leading a $700 million Series C-1 round in October 2024. The two companies have said they ultimately plan to build 5 gigawatts of new nuclear generating capacity in the U.S. by 2039. Unlike many newly announced power plants, these reactors would be connected to the public electric grid, though Amazon says the power would also serve its data centers.

The companies’ aggressive timeline still depends on X-energy successfully delivering its first power plant at a Dow Chemical plant southeast of Houston, Texas. The site, called Seadrift, has recently been at the center of a lawsuit filed by the state of Texas, which accuses the plant of “habitual non-compliance” with water and solid-waste regulations and permits. X-energy has yet to break ground at Seadrift, which will host four Xe-100 reactors to provide the chemical plant with heat and electricity. The company said its construction permit is in the final phases of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s review process.

Bezos doing atomics

By Rosco P. Coltrane • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

What can go wrong?

I wonder if the control room technicians will be allowed bathroom breaks…

Re:Bezos doing atomics

By Waffle Iron • • Score: 4, Funny • Thread

****1/2 “Customers say that this is a great small modular nuclear reactor. They like the compact size and the fact that it’s not too much power for a data center or industrial site. They especially appreciate the ease of setup and that the ultimate waste disposal question has been deferred yet again so that they don’t have to worry about it. However, some customers report problems with cost overruns, vaporware, and availability of suitable fuel. Some customers note a larger terrorist attack surface per megawatt relative to full-sized reactors and question the security arrangements. There are also reports of real-world reliability problems with the novel design, with one customer reporting a catastrophic meltdown in their urban installation.”

Re:Bezos doing atomics

By shilly • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

This is overstated. According to X-energy’s regulatory disclosures, the Xe-100 has four main operator-controlled variables: control rod position, He circulator operation, feedwater pump operation, and turbine throttle valve position. It’s more automated than older plants, but not completely automated, and older plants are also quite automated. It does use more passive safety features, though. And of course, it’s not actually been built yet, so it’s all theoretical at this stage.

Re:Bezos doing atomics

By Sique • • Score: 4, Informative • Thread

And of course, it’s not actually been built yet, so it’s all theoretical at this stage.

This is the most important part. Right now, X-Energy is pure vaporware. And yes, I know, all reactor designs are essentially vaporware, because their task is to heat water to turn it into vapor. But this is vapor-vapor. The time line calls for 12 small reactors to be ready by 2039, each rated 80 MW. And the previous project, as mentioned, was already set up 2 years ago, and not a single foundation has been poured yet.

This is one of those incubator projects. Amazon is investing and probably betting on a 30% chance that this will ever bear fruit. Or a 10% chance. I don’t know Amazon’s calculation. But this project does not mean that any of those 16 reactors (4 previously, 12 now) will ever come into existence. But if they would, Amazon had an edge on powering data centers. So they think it’s worth the risk.

Tech companies should have nukes

By OrangeTide • • Score: 3 • Thread

If tech companies can’t control AI or stop hackers, then they have no right playing with nuclear reactors. Because these tech companies are 100% putting them online, and they never sufficiently harden products from cyber attacks. It’s not just Amazon, but even the small reactor companies are these fly-by-night start ups funded by the same investors in tech and carry much of the same problematic attitude towards balancing profit with responsibility. (Profit maximalists, i. e. no balance whatsoever)

Professor Calls To Abolish Business Schools For Failing Society

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
joshuark writes:
Professor Christopher Marquis makes a provocative argument about business schools: “We need to abolish them.” A 20-year business educator at Harvard, Cornell and Cambridge, Marquis argues in The New York Times and on LinkedIn that MBA programs sanctify profit-driven dealmaking at the expense of public life. “That’s not the institution failing,” he writes. “Sadly, it’s the institution working.”
“Business school doesn’t just hand out skills and a network,” argues Marquis, “it quietly reshapes how people see the world, rewarding dealmaking, simplification, and optimization for financial metrics, while workers and communities become afterthoughts.”
Marquis points to research suggesting that business-school-trained CEOs often benefit shareholders at the expense of workers, without delivering measurable improvements in company performance… "[W]hen a business-school-trained CEO takes over a firm, wages fall and labor’s share of income drops, with no gain in productivity,” writes Marquis. “In both the U.S. and Denmark, what passes for the ‘managerial skill’ of business-school graduates turns out to be a transfer of wealth away from workers and toward shareholders. Students deserve better than a machine that narrows their sense of what’s possible.”

Number Go Up Schools

By ihadafivedigituid • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
A contemporary business school is what happens when you optimize for one thing and ignore the rest: you get a factory for amoral make-number-go-up vampires.

I say we take off and nuke them from orbit, it’s the only way to be sure.

Re: Yes

By Z00L00K • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Short term profits have been rewarded over long term sustainability of businesses. That’s the reason for enshittification.

Re:Yes

By Krishnoid • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
Yup, sounds about right. Maybe if they brought back the corporate death penalty, it would rein in some of the more heinous transgressions of business education and practice. Then again, public benefit corporations exist, and I figure business people need education for those as well.

Re:Building wealth

By Required Snark • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
When you say “We live in a capitalistic society that builds wealth” your are using “we” to exclude people. Your “we” explicitly excludes at least the lower 50% of the US population. Besides not having the option of owning a home, which was doable for a lot of people in the post WW2 era, many people don’t have any retirement savings except Social Security. And there are also far too many Americans who are a paycheck or two away from homeliness. People are buying groceries on credit, which is insane.

Even though you won’t admit it, your position has the direct effect of condemning millions of people of poverty and an early death. The population in the socialist Europe has a better life experience and increasing life expectancy while the US is falling behind. (That is an actual fact so I’m sure it makes you uncomfortable, and you may even try to refute it. I’ve had others of your ilk on Slashdot ask me to prove IRL facts. Do your homework and don’t spread lies.)

You are benefiting from the current corrupt system and you literally don’t care if people are dying in the street, as long as doesn’t happen in front of you. That’s what your professing when you end by saying “but don’t change capitalism”.

The IRL factual information supporting my position is the graph of the distribution of wealth in the US post 1950. Around the time of Regan the fortunes of normal humans started to go down while the (literal) fortunes of the rich started climbing. Follow the money: for over 50 years there has been a transfer of wealth from the bottom and middle to the top.

(Since you people are so predictable I will reference the riots in France. They have riots every so often, and so do we. However the ongoing daily violence in both urban and rural America dwarfs any similar activity in even the poorer parts of Europe. The statistics on IRL violence, including homicide, are undeniable. Not that that will effect your position.)

Re: Yes

By hdyoung • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
And yet, somehow, our crappy, failing, decaying, corrupt US-style capitalism is at the top of the pack, and has been there since ww2. So, pushing a century. Meanwhile, Russia is cratering towards becoming a 3rd world country. China, for all its very real accomplishments and strengths, has a system that produces workers that are literally a third as productive as US workers (same size economies but they have triple the workers, and there’s only one way that math works out).

Who else to compare to. South America, the Middle East and Africa aren’t even in the running. Don’t talk about places like Kuwait. They’re a village lucky enough to be floating on an ocean of light crude oil. Anyone can be rich if they’re handed a cheat code. India? They’ve still got a loonngg way to go. The only real contender is Europe. For the most part, they’re capitalist as well.

I would love to see some kinder, gentler economic system displace hard-nosed capitalism. But, so far, nothing else even comes close.

TP-Link Moves to Assemble Routers In the US Following Import Ban

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
TP-Link plans to begin assembling routers in Mississippi as early as 2027 after the FCC banned imports of new foreign-made consumer routers over security concerns. Engadget reports:
The company has signed a letter of intent with manufacturer Key Tronic and, pending approval from regulators, TP-Link says stateside assembly of its routers could start at a Mississippi production line as soon as early 2027.

Once things are up and running, Wi-Fi 8 routers are expected to be among the first TP-Link products that Key Tronic assembles. TP-Link claims that the agreement is part of its “long-term effort to accelerate US investment in high-tech manufacturing and job creation, designing and assembling next-generation products for American consumers here on American soil.”

The company said it will still have to source components from outside the US. “Many [components] are just not available from a domestic source, and this is not a TP-Link issue,” TP-Link’s corporate affairs officer Steve Kovsky told PC Mag. “This is an issue for all manufacturers that are trying to onshore manufacturing.”

So, a $0.50 step at the very end?

By gweihir • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

Yeah, great win. Probably will charge customers $10 more for that “Assembled in the USA!” line on the box.

Multiplier effect to wages paid to a worker.

By drnb • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
If a factory opens in a less prosperous state isn’t that a good thing? Keep in mind that there is a multiplier effect to wages paid to a worker. That worker will in turn spend money locally that helps support additional jobs. That factory sounds like a way to help a region reduce poverty.

Re:So, a $0.50 step at the very end?

By rsilvergun • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread
Also modern factory automation means that I won’t be any jobs. Go look up stuff like how the old steam controller is assembled. The Gundam factory is pretty crazy too there’s like three people that are responsible for manufacturing every single Gundam model kit on the planet.

Years ago I remember a sleeping bag company going out of business because they couldn’t compete with the larger companies. But at their peak they made something like a third of the sleeping bag sold in the country and they did that with technology from maybe 20 years ago and about 120 or 130 employees.

We should be talking more about how automation has hollowed out the middle class but I don’t think anyone has a solution for it. It would be one thing if magic machines automated all the work away but that’s not what they did. A shitload of jobs have been automated but a lot of people still need to work. But we are rapidly approaching the time when we have a large population of people for who there is absolutely no useful work. At the same time there’s a population of people who we really do need to do work and there isn’t a lot of overlap between the two. The people whose jobs got replaced by machines aren’t really capable of doing all that much more. They didn’t suddenly become super genius mathematicians or doctors or something.

So we’re going to basically have a rather nasty fight between a shitload of people who we don’t have any place for in society and a shitload of people who are needed to do what work is left. And I do not see how that fight resolves itself especially with the Epstein class egging both sides on

Cybersecurity or bringing a few jobs stateside?

By Zero__Kelvin • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) banned imports of new, foreign-made consumer wireless routers due to severe national security, supply chain, and cybersecurity risks. They already say that they will need to import components. Furthermore, is sounds like they are just assembling the devices here, not manufacturing them. Are they importing the PCBs then just putting them into other imported boxes here? Surely nobody would think that doing this somehow mitigates in any way any “cybersecurity risk”. I’m not against creating a few jobs in the US, but let’s not try to claim this has anything to do with cybersecurity. This may create a few jobs, but won’t mitigate any risk, and will likely cost citizens more while TP-Link increases its profits on our backs as we pay extra for that “Made in America” sticker.

Probably

By SuperDre • • Score: 3 • Thread
They probably just ship the casing and the motherboard from China to the US, and then assemble it. That’s also how many car manufacturers avoid duties here in Europe.

Trump DHS Officials Asked CISA To Secretly Aquire and Hack a Voting Machine

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Longtime Slashdot reader fahrbot-bot shares a report from ProPublica:
A few months into President Donald Trump’s second term, political appointees at the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) wanted Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) to secretly acquire a voting machine and hack it. The appointees wanted the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency to procure the machine, examine it and report back the findings so they could be given to the White House, according to two former administration officials with knowledge of the request.

The proposition was shocking to CISA’s career staffers, according to one of the former officials. CISA typically worked to thwart hackers. Moreover, the agency had been directed not to alert the voting machine company if it uncovered flaws, contrary to its standard practices. The request made the CISA employees fear they were being asked to take part in political interference. “My thought was they could keep it in their back pocket to invalidate any [election] results they don’t like,” one of the former officials said. “This goes against everything CISA represents.” [Or, perhaps do something worse?]

The CISA employees repeatedly told the political appointees that their request was impossible, in part because the agents capable of pulling off such an operation had just been laid off by Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) initiative. The appointees eventually stopped pressing CISA. Though not acted on, the request shows how the Trump administration has tried to use the agency for its own ends while draining it of resources for one of its critical missions: protecting the nation’s voting systems.

Re:Misleading way to phrase this much?

By taustin • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

So… They wanted to prove they’re insecure by keeping any vulnerabilities found a secret?

No, they wanted to prove they’re insecure so they could reveal the proof at a press conference (or on social media).

Poor Behaviour

By hadleyburg • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

Immorality and corruption are nothing to be ashamed of in Trump’s mind. Being concerned about that sort of thing is for “losers”. On the contrary, they can be carried out in the open and bragged about.

This is why, having been passed over for the Nobel Peace prize, Trump called the decision an “indelible stain on the country of Norway”, not because he is unaware that the decision is not made by the “country of Norway”, it’s just that he finds it difficult to comprehend a government that won’t interfere in the organisations within its borders.

It just baffles me that a country so proud of its founding concepts - separation of powers, no one is above the law, aversion to tyrants, etc. - could select this person, twice, knowing his character. It’s utterly baffling.

Re:They could have just read the book

By gweihir • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

I see where you failed there: There is no one in the Trump regime that can read well enough to understand that book.

Re:Misleading way to phrase this much?

By kqs • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Wow, you are really really desperate to de-legitimize elections. Why?

If you had read the post you were responding to: The “paper trail” my county uses is paper ballots which people fill in with pens (fill in the ovals, what fun!) and are then scanned. Those paper ballots are turned in to the county, as are the memory cards containing the scanned data. If there is any question, the county will hand-count the paper ballots, filled out by the voters NOT THE MACHINE.

You should probably ask yourself why you typed a comment that made a vague assertion contradicting a post with precise verifiable details. You may find out something about your opinions and decisions which will be unpleasant (but very important) to face.

Re:Misleading way to phrase this much?

By fahrbot-bot • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

I believe it is absolutely fair for an administration to try and prove that a system is vulnerable.

Sure and they do that by specifying requirements in contracts. And if the administration wants CISA to directly test a machine, (a) there’s no legitimate reason to acquire a machine in secret and (b) there’s no legitimate reason to keep any vulnerabilities found a secret from the vendor.

A Hacker Broke Into John Deere, SharkNinja With an Army of AI Agents

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Verge:
A hacker broke into more than 100 websites using an army of AI agents that mostly operated on their own, according to findings from the AI security firm Norforge. Though Norforge doesn’t name the targets, Reuters reports that the victims included companies like John Deere, SharkNinja, and Cummins.

[…] Researchers at Norforge uncovered the attacks through exposed work on Cairn, an open-source AI platform that describes itself as a “general-purpose problem-solving engine.” With Cairn, users set a start and end point for the AI agents, which document their progress as they move forward with the task. However, as noted by Norforge, hackers can also use the tool to orchestrate cyberattacks using AI agents.

The hacker who broke into more than 100 sites was the “most active” among the exposed Cairn instances discovered by Norforge, waging attacks on companies based in the US, Canada, Australia, and Japan, as reported by Reuters. This attacker laid out “preferred intrusion tactics” using fewer than 100 Chinese characters, with successful breaches taking about 23 hours, according to Reuters. Overall, Nordforge found more than 20 exposed Cairn instances that are “likely malicious.”
A John Deere spokesperson said there is “no indication that sensitive information was accessed” as a result of the attack, while Cummins said it’s “investigating the report of a potential cyber-attack on a website operated by one of our third-party vendors.”
Meanwhile, SharkNinja says the breach impacted a standalone site with product support information, and that it has contained the threat.

I wouldn’t complain if they leaked service manuals

By afaiktoit • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
Just sayin

“no indication that sensitive information was acce

By darkain • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

“no indication that sensitive information was accessed”

Translation: “We didn’t have proper monitoring in place, so we don’t even know what they did”

Re:Why the fuck

By drinkypoo • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

I suggest reading Bruce Sterling’s Heavy Weather, though as always, the most prophetic Cyberpunk novel remains Neal Stephenson’s Snow Crash. His particular vision of techno-feudalism is rapidly coming true, and it’s just as stupid as he imagined it would be. (Obvs the mystical mind virus stuff is not what I mean here.)

Apple Announces October 28 ‘Pro and Tell’ Event

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Following its October 13 HomeView launch, Apple is gearing up for its second hardware event of the month. The event is scheduled for October 28 in Los Angeles and carries the tagline “Pro and tell.” 9to5Mac reports:
Rumors say Apple has a slew of new products to announce at its next event, headlining by its first MacBook Pro with a touchscreen and OLED. According to Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman, here’s what’s on the docket:

- New 14-inch and 16-inch touchscreen MacBook Pro models with OLED displays. They will also have a Dynamic Island for the first time and will be “significantly lighter” than the current models. The new MacBook Pro models are expected to be powered by the M5 Pro and M5 Max chips.
- A revamped iPad mini with an OLED screen, a “revamped speaker system,” and a relocated FaceTime camera
- New iMac and entry-level 14-inch MacBook Pro models powered by the M6 chip, which will “look like their current versions.”

Rinse and repeat

By Tarlus • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Pretty much since the advent of OSX I’ve observed this pattern.

1) Apple announces a long-rumored feature or product that their competitors have already offered for years.

2) A sizeable and persistent assemblage of anti-Apple neckbeards spend their time berating Apple for playing catch-up. There’s always that guy who has to respond to articles like these with one-line bangers like “magical” or “innovative”.

3) The product releases and demonstrates some kind of refinement - which sets it apart from the competitors - because Apple has taken the time to make it feel like their operating system was designed around the idea. (Not always the case, less so in recent years, but true often enough.) It makes Apple’s take on the idea more novel and appealing to consumers.

4) In subsequent years, competitors mimic Apple’s approach. The neckbeards go silent.

Followed by something involving an ellipsis and a profit.

- Written from an old Dell running Debian

Lighter = More Fragile

By Hadlock • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread

>The new MacBook Pro models are expected to be “significantly lighter” than the current models.
 
This is the exact opposite of what I want. A macbook pro needs to survive a fall from the passenger seat of a chevy suburban (more than 3’ high) onto concrete. Today you get about one drop per corner before the aluminum deforms too much and can’t take the beating and the display breaks. Maybe the new OLED are less prone to cracking. At no time in my life did I look at my work issued MBP and think “I wish this were lighter” particularly the 13/14” models

Phew!

By SigIO • • Score: 3 • Thread

If this event was in Vegas, an event name like that would be trouble.

Florida DMV Hacked After Police Dept Insecurely Stored Login Info

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Florida’s DMV says a September 4 breach exposed driver’s license and motor vehicle records after attackers obtained credentials that a local law-enforcement employee had “improperly stored on an electronic device.” The ShinyHunters group has been linked to the intrusion. Ars Technica reports:
In a notice posted Friday, [Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles (FLHSMV)] confirmed that it took “immediate steps” after discovering that “a malicious actor accessed certain department records on September 4, 2026, using compromised credentials.” There’s “no evidence” that data has yet been misused, the department said, but law enforcement “determined the information potentially affected includes driver license and motor vehicle data, to include document images, and other personal information.”

[…] On a webpage describing the security incident, FLHSMV confirmed that an “international cybercriminal organization” was behind the breach but did not specify which group or how long they had access. Instead, officials claimed to have “promptly mitigated the breach, launched an investigation, and issued required notification to state authorities.” Mitigations included “blocking unauthorized access, resetting relevant user credentials, engaging cybersecurity professionals, and implementing additional safeguards to protect sensitive information,” FLHSMV said. Florida’s investigation is “ongoing,” officials said, but a cybercriminal group called ShinyHunters — which recently claimed credit for hacking the FBI — may have stolen the data.
Florida residents affected by the breach will receive a letter offering one year of free credit monitoring through Sontiq, Inc. Those whose contact information is outdated can email the FLHSMV at customerinquiry@flhsmv.gov to determine whether their data was compromised.

Rules for thee but not for me

By Zondar • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

Where’s the required multi-factor authentication?

Get a printed title for vehicle you own.

By couchslug • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread

DMV lose or delete old title records fairly often. Fortunately I had hard copy titles for all my vintage vehicles so getting one reloaded was not a problem.

When I buy a vehicle I get a hard copy of the title printed on the spot, not mailed to me. I’ve been a mechanic for ~five decades and seen many title problems due to buyers failing to transfer titles then losing their copy (which is the most common error), but don’t count on titles in a DMV system to last forever.

Don’t omit boat and outboard motor titles where applicable. You can avoid much frustration.

Ah the all soothing make it right

By stabiesoft • • Score: 3 • Thread
free year of credit monitoring. I’d like to think everyone affected gets a whack at those responsible. Bring back paddles!

Elon Musk Vows To Give a SpaceX Share To ‘Every Kid In America’

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from CNN:
Elon Musk has said he will give every child in America a stake in SpaceX, his $2 trillion aerospace and artificial intelligence company, as tech firms face intensifying scrutiny over their impact on society. “Next year, I will give one of my SpaceX shares to every kid in America,” he wrote on X on Monday. “This will be the first of many.”

SpaceX only began trading publicly in June (and after the biggest initial public offering in history). The company’s shares were trading for about $146 when the market closed on Friday. Musk’s proposal was thin on detail. It is not clear how those shares would be distributed to the tens of millions of American children or whether all of them would even be eligible. According to the United States Census Bureau, there are roughly 73 million people under the age of 18, making Musk’s potential giveaway worth about $10.7 billion at SpaceX’s current share price.
The move came in response to Anthropic’s announcement on Sunday that it will commit at least 5% of its shares to a “Public Benefit Fund” that will donate money to social causes. “I recommend giving the shares directly to the public,” Musk said in a reply to Anthropic’s announcement. “This is what I will be doing.”

Poll numbers

By ArchieBunker • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

Wow the poll numbers must be pretty bad if he’s resorting to socialism.

Three takeaways

By dirk • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

1) Does anyone really think this will happen? I would put as much faith in this as I do Trump’s $5000 checks in the GOP wins the midterms.
2) Does anyone really think he is going to give away his personal shares? Most likely, if it happens, they would issue 73 millions additional shares (or less as he will find some way to send them to only certain people), thus devalueing not only these new shares, but all the shares.
3) Even if he did give his own shares, that is still a time amount of his wealth. Does anyone really think he would ever even notice this change in wealth? This just shows how incredibly out of touch the uber rich are with regular people. This is about 1% of his net worth. He could give away 50% and it would never be noticed. But because it is a big number, people think this is rich people doing good when it is them doing the minimum for good press.

Re:That’s easier to do

By vux984 • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Its a little tricky too, as children generally don’t have suitable investment accounts that can hold publicly traded shares. I’m doubtful they even legally can open those accounts.

So what are they going to do, issue a gazillion single paper share certificates? What a shitshow that would be, the fees and shipping alone around dealing with that for a single share would be nuts, not to mention the hassle of redeeming them, and the untold numbers that would be misplaced or destroyed. And I’m still not sure children can own them, or sign the agreements required to get them.

What else could the do? Create beneficial trusts for every child? Whose going to administer that? and again the fees and management expenses around it would be nuts all for a $150 space-x share?

It might be reasonable for him to set a bunch aside, and as children reach adulthood, let them claim them at that point.
If the idea is that the kid can’t sell it or whatever until they’re an adult anyway, its probably fine. It’ll be income maybe when they receive it, so that could work out badly for some kids though, if they have to sell it to cover the taxes on it, because they don’t have a job yet. Especially if its appreciated to a couple thousand or something. (How are splits etc handled, do they get one or more? Or worse… reverse splits on a single share?)

Great PR!

By kwerle • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

This is like Trump promising $5K if republicans win the midterms. It’s just a PR stunt.

Imagine trying to reason out the tax implications of something like this. The privacy implications. Everything.

Elon: “I really wanted to, but lawyers wouldn’t let me!”

No way to see that coming.

Re:Poll numbers

By MachineShedFred • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

It’s weapons-grade bullshit.

Oh, he’s going to eat the expense of sending out an 8-digit number of proxy votes now? Every child in America (and their parents as legal guardians) now get a shareholder vote?

This is not happening the same way Trump’s voter bribery checks aren’t happening.

Wine Ported to OpenBSD

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Wine has been successfully ported to OpenBSD, with developers reporting that dozens of 64-bit Windows applications now run on the operating system. “Even the Remaster of The Witcher 3 which released just last month runs, and runs well,” writes Thomas Frohwein, OpenBSD developer and ports maintainer. OSnews reports:
The biggest limitation seems to be the lack of support for WoW64, so 32bit Windows software won’t work. Still, this is a massive milestone for OpenBSD, and makes especially gaming a somewhat viable option on OpenBSD.

Of course!

By Anonymous Coward • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

I certainly enjoy some port wine when involved with any kind of BDSM activities.

Is it?

By drinkypoo • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

Still, this is a massive milestone for OpenBSD

Is it, though? The question is whether they are going to implement WOW support or not. There is a little discussion on the linked article about how it either is or isn’t possible. If they are stopping here then it’s not that exciting for most people who want to run Windows programs, because there’s a surprisingly high percentage of 32 bit binaries out there.

Remember this date…

By Valgrus Thunderaxe • • Score: 4, Funny • Thread
Because it’s the day of OpenBSD on the desktop.

Interesting

By bill_mcgonigle • • Score: 3 • Thread

Companies that sell control systems with proprietary software running on Windows could distribute their software running on Wine/OpenBSD as an appliance without reengineering the application.

Windows updates/hardware abandonment etc. are real headaches while control systems ought to be secure.

GPL virality has many vendors scared of linux appliances, warranted or not.

Elizabeth Holmes Doc ‘You Can See Everything’ Shocks With Massive Opening

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Nathan Fielder and Lance Oppenheim’s Elizabeth Holmes documentary “You Can See Everything” earned more than $15 million in its limited opening weekend, making it one of the biggest documentary launches in decades and the strongest opening for a film on fewer than 1,000 screens since Borat in 2006. It was also “the biggest non-music documentary since ‘Fahrenheit 9/11’ in 2004,” adds CNN. From the report:
Many weekend screenings in cities like New York and Los Angeles were sold out despite the three-hour running time. The film’s distributor, A24, called it “one of the largest limited-release openings of the 21st century.” “You Can See Everything” opened on fewer than 900 screens following a jaw-dropping surprise premiere at the Telluride Film Festival last month.

Fielder and Oppenheim worked on the project in secret for years, filming with Holmes and her partner Billy Evans in the weeks before Holmes went to prison in 2023. Holmes was convicted of wire fraud and conspiracy to defraud Theranos investors, but she tried to convince the filmmakers of her innocence.

Fielder, who appears on camera interviewing Holmes and Evans, takes the film in unexpected directions, thrilling critics and theatergoers. The film has an extraordinarily high 99% “fresh score” on Rotten Tomatoes and a record-high 4.8 rating on Letterboxd.
Further reading: Will New Documentary Make Theranos Founder Elizabeth Holmes More Sympathetic?

Re:The title sells…

By know-nothing cunt • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

Perhaps the “Massive Opening” of the headline?

Re:The title sells…

By GrimSavant • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

If you want to know where the title comes from:
 
…

It’s from a text message that Elizabeth Holmes sends to Nathan Fielder, shown within the movie.

As you might imagine with Holmes, it is a deeply ironic title.

I saw it a few days ago

By GrimSavant • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

It’s pretty wild, and there is good reason for the hype around it. It’s really stuck in my mind.

It’s a dive into deception and manipulation, and the relationships between some deeply pathological people. Ostensibly it is about the particular scammers depicted and the people making the movie themselves, but there’s a couple moments where you see Toto pulling back the curtain a bit about the grift being more endemic in these Silicon Valley startup types in general.

It is not an entirely conventional documentary. Someone else suggested the category of “meta documentary” (it gets pretty meta), but perhaps it’s a deconstruction of a documentary, or a documentary for a post truth environment? I’m not sure. If you’ve seen other Nathan Fielder works like the Rehearsal the way it goes off the rails will be familiar. And no, the movie does not hide the ball about questions about its objectivity or ethics what the movie is doing itself, it shoves it in your face in downright unsettling ways.

John Carreyrou, the WSJ journalist behind the piece that kicked off the spiraling downfall of Theranos and the most comprehensive chronicler of that fraud, gave You Can See Everything a glowing review.

Re:Fielder in Wired magazine

By Whateverthisis • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
It helped her that her parents worked for the government, the State Department, for many years, as well as Enron (surprise surprise). her family lived next door to Tim Draper, one of the early and more successful silicon valley VCs, and her dad was college friends with Don Lucas, who was also an extremely well known investor in Silicon Valley and he became the first Chairman, and he introduced her to Larry Ellison who also invested.

These things are orchestrated, not led.

Re: Fielder in Wired magazine

By fahrbot-bot • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

She looks like a muppet. You’re just attracted to crazy.

And with her blond hair, she could be the next White House Press Secretary. :-)

America Tries Reviving Shuttered Nuclear Plants - Partly to Help Power Data Centers

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
America is “making an unprecedented attempt to revive three shuttered nuclear plants to meet rising energy demand,” reports the Los Angeles Times,

“Two of the plants have contracts with Big Tech companies that will pay a premium to get large amounts of carbon-free energy for data centers…”
No commercial nuclear reactor is known to have resumed generating electricity after beginning the decommissioning process that takes one out of service, though some reactors have restarted after long outages. The Department of Energy is lending as much as $4.4 billion to restart the Palisades Power Plant in Michigan, the Crane Clean Energy Center on Pennsylvania’s Three Mile Island and the Duane Arnold Energy Center in Iowa to restore a combined 2.25 gigawatts of electricity, which can power roughly 2 million homes and businesses. All three of the plants closed before their licenses expired, largely because the electricity they produced was considered too expensive… Restarting a reactor is a fairly quick way to get a lot of electricity, and it’s cheaper than building a new, large reactor, said nuclear engineering expert Todd Allen…

Edwin Lyman, at the Union of Concerned Scientists, said the taxpayer money being used should go toward addressing safety risks. For example, most U.S. plants were built between 1970 and 1990 and were designed to withstand natural disasters of that era, said Lyman, director of nuclear power safety at UCS. But climate change is making extreme weather events more frequent and severe. “It’s possible, if they set the right level of safety and spend the necessary funds to meet that, they could restore these plants to operable condition,” he said. “That’s not happening at this point....”

NextEra Energy and Google are collaborating to restart Duane Arnold by early 2029… Microsoft has a contract with the Crane Clean Energy Center on Three Mile Island just outside Harrisburg. The plant was the site of the nation’s worst commercial nuclear power accident in 1979. The accident destroyed one reactor, leaving the plant with one functioning. In 2019, Constellation Energy’s then-parent company Exelon shut down the functioning reactor, saying it was losing money and that Pennsylvania lawmakers had refused to subsidize it. Constellation Energy announced in 2024 that it would spend $1.6 billion to restart the reactor under a 20-year agreement with Microsoft. It hopes to bring the plant back online in 2027…

Palisades is expected to be the first nuclear plant in the world to resume generating power after beginning the decommissioning process.

Good side effect

By Gilgaron • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
See at least this could be some good they’d be doing on accident instead of burning a bunch of natural gas for no good reason, and it’ll be useful post bubble.

The Expense Is In The Shutdown And Cleanup

By SlashbotAgent • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

The major expense of a nuclear reactor is in decommissioning, the shutdown and cleanup at it’s retirement. This process can take 20 years itself and require billions of dollars.

Where will that decommissioning money come from? Will it be the rate payers and tax payers as has been in the past? You betcha!

Also… If the reactor was already entering the decommissioning phase, we must assume that it was in bad shape. So now they are going to squeeze another twenty years of use out of a worn out reactor? And then go through a 20 year decommissioning process?

This is going to vastly over-run budgets

By shilly • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

We all know that when you re-wire a house, it costs a shit-ton more than new wiring, because you always run into unexpected issues. That exact problem is going to bite them in the ass here, too: they are going to uncover all kinds of shite they have to deal with, not least because of the radioactivity, temperatures, pressures, corrosive chemicals, etc that are inherent to nuclear power plants.

Palisades is already blowing past its budget and timings estimates for this exact reason: 1,163 steam generator tubes with stress corrosion cracking, way more than expected, leaks in underground water pipes, valves requiring replacement, major turbine refurbishment etc.

Re:it’s brown people doing the hurting

By drinkypoo • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

Hi, I’m a real French woman

Is your name Claude-ia by any chance?

If you want us to believe you’re a real person, post from a known account, not anonymously.

Re: Good side effect

By OrangeTide • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

We’re going to switch our nuclear power plants to be monitored by AI to reduce staffing needs

Mozilla is Calling Out Microsoft for Forcing Edge on Users

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
“Mozilla reps tell me they’ve met with Microsoft about their concerns,” reports PC Magazine, “but that the company wasn’t responsive.”
“They’ll do the minimum the law requires to respect user choice,” explains Kush Amlani, Mozilla’s counsel overseeing global competition and regulatory work… Mozilla recently marked 100 days since it released an 87-page report detailing the ways in which Microsoft pushes Edge on Windows PCs.... One example is how Windows often displays a “Let’s finish setting up your PC” pop-up after an OS update. This screen has an enabled-by-default option to “use recommended browser settings,” which makes Edge the default web browser.

However, that screen doesn’t appear in Europe. European laws now force Microsoft to make Windows more respectful of user choices. For instance, in European countries, the Start menu opens links in your default web browser rather than in Edge, as it does everywhere else. Amlani says Mozilla wants Microsoft to release the European version of Windows to the rest of the world. However, he thinks this will require government action. As he puts it, “Microsoft can do better when it’s forced.”
The last line of the article sums up Mozilla’s main point. “No one should have to fight their OS this hard on something as simple as a browser preference.”

Is this news?

By commodore73 • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
I think this would only be news if Microsoft or some government entity were to do something about it. Otherwise, it just seems like the same old headline that’s been haunting us as long as Microsoft has existed - Microsoft abuses its users to harm competition. That being said, I actually thought edge was a decent browser, but that was years ago when I still used Windows. As a veteran .NET programmer that actually loved Microsoft Office, Windows 11 was just more abuse than I could take.

Re:Is this news?

By sg_oneill • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

The problem is, Microsoft addresses the Edge concerns by saying “But Edge isn’t in a monopoly position. Chrome is still more popular”. But when it does that it wants you to ignore what got in trouble the first time around.

Back in the 90s/early 2000s , Microsoft didn’t get so badly busted that it almost got split apart by the regulators because IE was a monopoly. Microsoft got in trouble because it abused its windows monopoly to illegally obtain its browser monopoly at the expense of Netscape.

Its doing the *exact* same thing again. I am seeing countless, mostly elderly, folks using Edge because they dont know how to convince windows to let them use chrome by default. Its actually harder to find those defaults than it was back in the 90s/early 2000s.

Its just they are brazen about it now, becuase they know the current admin wont go after them, for the same reason George Bush ordered the justice department to stop going after microsoft back in the day.

Which won’t make a lick of difference to the EU, if it decides it wants to impose silly-money fines again. But the EU can only regulate EU business, so microsoft is playing different rules.

So we should ask ourselves, why do europeans get a choice and not us.

Not just the browser

By quonset • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Microsoft tries its best to force you to use Edge to open a pdf. If I have Adobe Reader set as my default pdf reader, that should be the end of it. Nope. Certain updates have reverted to using Edge so I, and others at my place of work, have to go in and reset the default.

Once someone has something set as their default, it should never be tampered with unless it’s done by the user.

more like Microsoft and Google than ever

By metac0rtex • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
I had to setup a fresh Firefox profile a few days back and I was astonished by how many user-hostile checkboxes that I had to uncheck. AI, sponsors in home page, firefox studies, un-removable search engines, malware protection that sends every site that I visit to google, the list is just endless. After all of that I still have to dive into about:config to find and disable at least a half-dozen other opt-out features. The whole thing feels exactly like the endless hoops that one has to jump through when installing Windows or using Edge or Chrome. I used to choose Firefox because Mozilla felt like a much more user-friendly option. I am not sure that this is still the case.

Re:Use Rufus

By slaker • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

The thing you are looking for is the Group Policy Editor. There are Group Policies that can disable the prompts to use Microsoft accounts and the ability to use OneDrive or Windows AI features, the hook Bing has in Windows Search (i.e. no more searching in the start menu and having it list web sites before the file or application you wanted) and all the “consumer experience” features in non-Enterprise Windows. There are a few GPO settings that get ignored unless you’re on Windows Enterprise or Education. Most of them related to Microsoft Datamining.

It is also possible to transition a Microsoft account back to a local one without losing your Profile. This is done in Settings > Accounts > Your Info in Windows 11.

gpedit.msc is normally only available to non-Home Windows SKUs, but it is unlockable with a tiny bit of Powershell:

Get-ChildItem @(
        “C:\Windows\servicing\Packages\Microsoft-Windows-GroupPolicy-ClientTools-Package*.mum”,
        “C:\Windows\servicing\Packages\Microsoft-Windows-GroupPolicy-ClientExtensions-Package*.mum”
) | ForEach-Object { dism.exe /online /norestart /add-package:"$_” }

Open an Administror-elevated Powershell or Terminal session, paste that in and even your $200 Acer vomit-grade notebook can work the way you want it again.

The reason we need GPOs for this stuff is that Microsoft’s software updates will occasionally re-set registry changes. If the changes are made with GPOs, the settings get reapplied and overwrite changes no matter what state Windows is in. This is particularly annoying for stuff like OneDrive, CoPilot and Edge preferences. You either have to regularly re-run scripts to alter the registry to the state you like it and hope nothing makes a structural change to where those settings live, or you set a GPO.

Anthropic Announces ‘Public Benefit Fund’, Committing 5% of Its Shares

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot
“Anthropic says it’s committing 5% of its shares to a ‘public benefit fund’,” reports TechCrunch, “structured as a wholly-owned entity within the company — with the option to contribute an additional 2% for every 50% increase in Anthropic’s value.”

Important context from CNBC:
The timing of Anthropic’s public fund announcement is both mandatory to prepare for an initial public offering, and “beneficial from an image perspective,” especially as AI reshapes the jobs market, Lise Buyer, partner at IPO advisory firm Class V Group, told CNBC…

Anthropic said it will share more about the fund structure and governance in the coming months, including valuation milestones that may increase the stake. It said it will also share progress on the fund in an upcoming public benefit report. In response to Anthropic’s announcement, Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk said on X that he “recommend[s] giving the shares directly to the public.”
Anthropic’s announcement hints the fund could address job-market displacements. It says the fund “might” explore “large donations to traditional nonprofits” — or, that it “might” explore “direct distributions to specific populations. One example is labor market impacts.”

It then argues AI could “cause instability” for many workers. And while Anthropic has already committed $200 million for “studying and addressing” this issue, Sunday’s announcement says “bolder” approaches may be needed, and that the Fund “will have the versatility to pursue them.”

“Combined with its co-founders’ pledge to donate 80% of their equity and an employee donation matching program, roughly 20% of Anthropic’s shares will be dedicated to public purposes,” reports Reuters, “excluding any additional shares added later.”

We found a tax break!

By locater16 • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread
And how to turn our tax break into a PR release!!

A Public Benefit Fund is a Slush Fund

By drnb • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
A Public Benefit Fund (PBF) is a Slush Fund that allows a company to spend money on stuff that does not enhance shareholder value. Its a legal technique to avoid doing what is profitable. Anthropic gets to define whatever the “public benefit” is, and divert shareholder money to it, and shareholders cannot do a damn thing about it. Its a way to fund pet projects of executives without any oversight.

Sure a PBC (Corporation) or PBF can actually do good, but despite the name it does not have to. “Good” is only in the eyes of those who created the PBF or PBC.

I’ve watched that shit for 20 years with MSFT

By T34L • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
Grew up in one of the many countries where Microsoft “paid for” so very much of school equipment, and all that amazing “free” gear cost the schools was curriculum conveniently teaching exclusively use of Microsoft OS and complete office suite. I’m looking towards the “public benefit fund” wholly dedicated to nurturing the public impression that all these elusive jobs are one free retraining making you a loyal Anthropic user away. I’ve eaten many a “free” lunch over the course of my life and, as a paying Anthropic customer, I’d not feed anything they hand out for the “public benefit” to my dog, or any other living being I’d care about the welfare of.

funds

By awwshit • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

> direct distributions to specific populations

Let me guess, a legal fund for jailed AI Executives?

Re:We found a tax break! (No, we didn’t!)

By Rei • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

Reality: No. They’re forming a wholly-owned LLC, not a 501(c)(3) charity. They’re treated as a disregarded entity for tax purposes. Transferring shares from Anthropic to the new LLC is just moving money from Anthropic’s left pocket to its right pocket. You don’t get a tax deduction from that. To get a deduction from IRC 170, you have to make an irrevocable transfer to a qualified 501(c)(3) charity.

If Anthropic later donates from this LLC to actual charities, it could then claim a corporate charitable deduction (against up to 10% of their profits - and note that word, profits; also, there’s no breaks for UBI programs targeted at individuals). But the formation of this entity and transfer of 5% of their shares to it does not give them any sort of a tax break whatsoever, and there’s no difference between donating from this structure to a charity and donating directly from Anthropic. In fact, by forming this structure, they’re skipping a potential tax break that they could get by forming and donating to a 501(c)(3) upfront.

(If your next question is “why not a 501(c)(3), then?”, the answer is because there’s all sorts of IRS restrictions on 501(c)(3)s, including distributing at least 5% of assets annually, excise taxes on investment gains, strict limits on cash transfers to individuals, etc)

I get that it’s popular for mod points to be cynical, but at least focus your cynicism on factuality. Try this: “We found a PR cheat! And how to turn things our CEO wants to do anyway and might not do until many years from now into a pre-IPO press release!”