Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Denmark Tests Unmanned Robotic Sailboat Fleet
  2. Social Media Now Main Source of News In US, Research Suggests
  3. Your Brain Has a Hidden Beat — and Smarter Minds Sync To It
  4. Google Cloud Caused Outage By Ignoring Its Usual Code Quality Protections
  5. Intel Will Lay Off 15% To 20% of Its Factory Workers, Memo Says
  6. Vandals Cut Fiber-Optic Lines, Causing Outage For Spectrum Internet Subscribers
  7. Threads Will Let You Hide Spoilers In Your Posts
  8. Salesforce Study Finds LLM Agents Flunk CRM and Confidentiality Tests
  9. The US Navy Is More Aggressively Telling Startups, ‘We Want You’
  10. Obscure Chinese Stock Scams Dupe American Investors by the Thousands
  11. OpenAI, Growing Frustrated With Microsoft, Has Discussed Making Antitrust Complaints To Regulators
  12. That ‘Unsubscribe’ Button Could Be a Trap, Researchers Warn
  13. Dutch Court Confirms Apple Abused Dominant Position in Dating Apps
  14. Windows Hello Face Unlock No Longer Works in the Dark and Microsoft Says It’s Not a Bug
  15. Japan Builds Near $700 Million Fund To Lure Foreign Academic Talent

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Denmark Tests Unmanned Robotic Sailboat Fleet

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Denmark has deployed four uncrewed robotic sailboats (known as “Voyagers”) for a three-month trial to boost maritime surveillance amid rising tensions in the Baltic region. The Associated Press reports:
Built by Alameda, California-based company Saildrone, the vessels will patrol Danish and NATO waters in the Baltic and North Seas, where maritime tensions and suspected sabotage have escalated sharply since Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine on Feb. 24, 2022. Two of the Voyagers launched Monday from Koge Marina, about 40 kilometers (25 miles) south of the Danish capital, Copenhagen. Powered by wind and solar energy, these sea drones can operate autonomously for months at sea. Saildrone says the vessels carry advanced sensor suites — radar, infrared and optical cameras, sonar and acoustic monitoring. Their launch comes after two others already joined a NATO patrol on June 6.

Saildrone founder and CEO Richard Jenkins compared the vessels to a “truck” that carries sensors and uses machine learning and artificial intelligence to give a “full picture of what’s above and below the surface” to about 20 to 30 miles (30 to 50 kilometers) in the open ocean. He said that maritime threats like damage to undersea cables, illegal fishing and the smuggling of people, weapons and drugs are going undetected simply because “no one’s observing it.” Saildrone, he said, is “going to places … where we previously didn’t have eyes and ears.” The Danish Defense Ministry says the trial is aimed at boosting surveillance capacity in under-monitored waters, especially around critical undersea infrastructure such as fiber-optic cables and power lines.

Social Media Now Main Source of News In US, Research Suggests

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from the BBC:
Social media and video networks have become the main source of news in the US, overtaking traditional TV channels and news websites, research suggests. More than half (54%) of people get news from networks like Facebook, X and YouTube — overtaking TV (50%) and news sites and apps (48%), according to the Reuters Institute. “The rise of social media and personality-based news is not unique to the United States, but changes seem to be happening faster — and with more impact — than in other countries,” a report found. Podcaster Joe Rogan was the most widely-seen personality, with almost a quarter (22%) of the population saying they had come across news or commentary from him in the previous week. The report’s author Nic Newman said the rise of social video and personality-driven news “represents another significant challenge for traditional publishers.”
Other key findings from the report include: - TikTok is the fastest-growing social and video platform, now used for news by 17% globally (up 4% from last year).
- AI chatbot use for news is increasing, especially among under-25s, where it’s twice as popular as in the general population.
- Most people believe AI will reduce transparency, accuracy, and trust in news.
- Across all age groups, trusted news brands with proven accuracy remain valued, even if used less frequently.

Oh dear

By Rosco P. Coltrane • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

When everybody’s perception of reality is different, nobody can agree on any hard fact and society unravels.

shocker

By NagrothAgain • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
On most news sites these days it’s difficult to claw your way through all the ads to get to the paywall, and on the off chance you make it through that it’s literally just the same blurb that every other site has. And the real articles are sandwiched between a stack of “paid content” which are essentially just more ads disguised as articles that if clicked take you to an even more ad infested site. There’s a few exceptions of course, but they are increasingly hard to find and the average person doesn’t want news they want someone “important” to deliver a daily dose of reinforcement to their belief systems.

Your Brain Has a Hidden Beat — and Smarter Minds Sync To It

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
alternative_right shares a report from ScienceDaily:
When the brain is under pressure, certain neural signals begin to move in sync — much like a well-rehearsed orchestra. A new study from Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (JGU) is the first to show how flexibly this neural synchrony adjusts to different situations and that this dynamic coordination is closely linked to cognitive abilities. “Specific signals in the midfrontal brain region are better synchronized in people with higher cognitive ability — especially during demanding phases of reasoning,” explained Professor Anna-Lena Schubert from JGU’s Institute of Psychology, lead author of the study recently published in the Journal of Experimental Psychology: General.

The researchers focused on the midfrontal area of the brain and the measurable coordination of the so-called theta waves. These brainwaves oscillate between four and eight hertz and belong to the group of slower neural frequencies. “They tend to appear when the brain is particularly challenged such as during focused thinking or when we need to consciously control our behavior,” said Schubert, who heads the Analysis and Modeling of Complex Data Lab at JGU. The 148 participants in the study, aged between 18 and 60, first completed tests assessing memory and intelligence before their brain activity was recorded using electroencephalography (EEG). […]

As a result, individuals with higher cognitive abilities showed especially strong synchronization of theta waves during crucial moments, particularly when making decisions. Their brains were better at sustaining purposeful thought when it mattered most. “People with stronger midfrontal theta connectivity are often better at maintaining focus and tuning out distractions, be it that your phone buzzes while you’re working or that you intend to read a book in a busy train station,” explained Schubert.
The findings have been published in the Journal of Experimental Psychology.

I can’t wait…

By 93 Escort Wagon • Score: 3 Thread

I’m looking forward to reading all the Slashdot posts where people explain how this obviously is what happens to them.

Google Cloud Caused Outage By Ignoring Its Usual Code Quality Protections

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Google Cloud has attributed last week’s widespread outage to a flawed code update in its Service Control system that triggered a global crash loop due to missing error handling and lack of feature flag protection. The Register reports:
Google’s explanation of the incident opens by informing readers that its APIs, and Google Cloud’s, are served through our Google API management and control planes.” Those two planes are distributed regionally and “are responsible for ensuring each API request that comes in is authorized, has the policy and appropriate checks (like quota) to meet their endpoints.” The core binary that is part of this policy check system is known as “Service Control.”

On May 29, Google added a new feature to Service Control, to enable “additional quota policy checks.” “This code change and binary release went through our region by region rollout, but the code path that failed was never exercised during this rollout due to needing a policy change that would trigger the code,” Google’s incident report explains. The search monopolist appears to have had concerns about this change as it “came with a red-button to turn off that particular policy serving path.” But the change “did not have appropriate error handling nor was it feature flag protected. Without the appropriate error handling, the null pointer caused the binary to crash.”

Google uses feature flags to catch issues in its code. “If this had been flag protected, the issue would have been caught in staging.” That unprotected code ran inside Google until June 12th, when the company changed a policy that contained “unintended blank fields.” Here’s what happened next: “Service Control, then regionally exercised quota checks on policies in each regional datastore. This pulled in blank fields for this respective policy change and exercised the code path that hit the null pointer causing the binaries to go into a crash loop. This occurred globally given each regional deployment.”

Google’s post states that its Site Reliability Engineering team saw and started triaging the incident within two minutes, identified the root cause within 10 minutes, and was able to commence recovery within 40 minutes. But in some larger Google Cloud regions, “as Service Control tasks restarted, it created a herd effect on the underlying infrastructure it depends on … overloading the infrastructure.” Service Control wasn’t built to handle this, which is why it took almost three hours to resolve the issue in its larger regions. The teams running Google products that went down due to this mess then had to perform their own recovery chores.
Going forward, Google has promised a couple of operational changes to prevent this mistake from happening again: “We will improve our external communications, both automated and human, so our customers get the information they need asap to react to issues, manage their systems and help their customers. We’ll ensure our monitoring and communication infrastructure remains operational to serve customers even when Google Cloud and our primary monitoring products are down, ensuring business continuity.”

Blame Gemini

By jonsmirl • Score: 3 Thread

Just waiting for some vibe coder at Google to say the Gemini AI wrote it.

was this

By hjf • Score: 3, Insightful Thread

The article doesn’t mention if this was AI generated code or not

Because it was and they won’t admit this in public. The narrative of “AI will replace us all in 3 months” shouldn’t be challenged.

Intel Will Lay Off 15% To 20% of Its Factory Workers, Memo Says

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Intel will lay off 15% to 20% of its factory workforce starting in July, potentially cutting over 10,000 jobs as part of a broader effort to streamline operations amid declining sales and mounting competitive pressure. “These are difficult actions but essential to meet our affordability challenges and current financial position of the company. It drives pain to every individual,” Intel manufacturing Vice President Naga Chandrasekaran wrote to employees Saturday. “Removing organizational complexity and empowering our engineers will enable us to better serve the needs of our customers and strengthen our execution. We are making these decisions based on careful consideration of what’s needed to position our business for the future.” The company reiterated that “we will treat people with care and respect as we complete this important work.” Oregon Live reports:
Intel announced the pending layoffs in April and notified factory workers last week that the cuts would begin in July. It hadn’t previously said just how deep the layoffs will go. The company had 109,000 employees at the end of 2024, but it’s not clear how many of those worked in its factory division — called Intel Foundry. The Foundry business includes a broad array of jobs, from technicians on the factory floor to specialized researchers who work years in advance to develop future generations of microprocessors.

Intel is planning major cuts in other parts of its business, too, but employees say the company hasn’t specified how many jobs it will eliminate in each business unit. Workers say they believe the impacts will vary within departments. Overall, though, the layoffs will surely eliminate several thousand jobs — and quite possibly more than 10,000.

Something is wrong there

By rsilvergun • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
Unless they have hit on some major new automation or they are getting a whole shitload of work visas for cheap overseas labor then there’s plenty of demand for their products and no reason for them to be laying off workers.

What this feels like is them trying to bump the stock with layoffs. I don’t see how it would last and they would be able to keep up with demand so that it would translate into lost sales. I mean their gpus are flying off the shelves as fast as they can stock them for Christ’s sake. And while AMD is eating a bit of their lunch there is still plenty of demand for Intel CPUs.

This feels like what Walmart did where they fired so many stockers they couldn’t keep their shelves stocked and they were losing money because people would show up to buy something and it wouldn’t be where they could buy it.

But I guess it will give them a short-term stock bump. And they can use the short-term cash savings for stock BuyBacks.

We used to have all sorts of laws that would discourage that sort of thing and our economy was much more stable when we did. The baby boomers grew up in that economy and it’s a huge part of why they built as much wealth as they did. That’s in all the government programs they benefited from that are gone now.

Death by MBA

By Gravis Zero • Score: 3 Thread

Honestly, MBAs are great at destroying large companies and if you don’t stop it before it starts then you’re just doomed. Frankly, I can’t think of a company more worthy of this fate than Intel.

Vandals Cut Fiber-Optic Lines, Causing Outage For Spectrum Internet Subscribers

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica:
Subscribers in Southern California of Spectrum’s Internet service experienced outages over the weekend following what company officials said was an attempted theft of copper lines located in Van Nuys, a suburb located 20 miles from downtown Los Angeles. The people behind the incident thought they were targeting copper lines, the officials wrote in a statement Sunday. Instead, they cut into fiber optic cables. The cuts caused service disruptions for subscribers in Van Nuys and surrounding areas. Spectrum has since restored service and is offering a $25,000 reward for information leading to the apprehension of the people responsible. Spectrum will also credit affected customers one day of service on their next bill.

“Criminal acts of network vandalism have become an issue affecting the entire telecommunications industry, not just Spectrum, largely due to the increase in the price of precious metals,” the officials wrote in a statement issued Sunday. “These acts of vandalism are not only a crime, but also affect our customers, local businesses and potentially emergency services. Spectrum’s fiber lines do not include any copper.” Outage information service Downdetector showed that thousands of subscribers in and around Van Nuys reported outages starting a little before noon on Sunday. Within about 12 hours, the complaint levels returned to normal. Spectrum officials told the Los Angeles Times that personnel had to splice thousands of fiber lines to restore service to affected subscribers.

they take anything now

By awwshit • Score: 3 Thread

In the last 6 months, around our office:
The brass screws on the big backflow valves for the Fire Sprinklers were cutoff/stolen from 6 valves.
A fire hydrant was stolen.
The copper pipe for 3 different water mains was stolen. These were fixed and they did it again.

Now the hydrants have special locks around the bolts, and everything else is coved with locking cages.

They come prepared, shut off the water and use tools.

Re: Leave a little copper out

By Jhon • Score: 4, Informative Thread

“Perhaps if it had adequate funding”

LAUSD has about half the number of students they had 20 years ago. They have more than double the number of administrators and about 20 more teachers over that same time scale — and the budget of LAUSD is over $18 billion — up from $8 billion 20 years ago. The number of students in that time also went from closer to 800,000 to about 400,000 now.

What this doesn’t include are the various city, county and state bond initiatives that added additional funding (which came at increased per dollar spent due to interest on the loans).

The amount of money we’re spending is not justified based on the student population. The number of administrators is not justified by student population.

And “oh”. Student performance have continued drop.

It’s not a funding problem. It’s a gross mismanagement problem along wtih turning LAUSD jobs in to “rewards” for both union employees and political supporters.

Threads Will Let You Hide Spoilers In Your Posts

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Threads is testing a new feature that lets users hide spoiler content by blurring images or text, which can then be revealed with a tap. The Verge reports:
Meta spokesperson Alec Booker told The Verge that this is a “global test,” though it’s not clear how many people will gain access to it. Spoilers will also look a bit different depending on which device you’re using. On desktop, spoilers are hidden by a gray block, but they appear behind a bunch of floating dots on mobile (which you can see in the GIF embedded [here]). “This feature is currently optimized for mobile, but we’re working to improve the experience for desktop,” Booker said.

Slow News Day?

By SigIO • Score: 3 Thread

Not an outright Zuck hater here, but is this really news?

Salesforce Study Finds LLM Agents Flunk CRM and Confidentiality Tests

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
A new Salesforce-led study found that LLM-based AI agents struggle with real-world CRM tasks, achieving only 58% success on simple tasks and dropping to 35% on multi-step ones. They also demonstrated poor confidentiality awareness. “Agents demonstrate low confidentiality awareness, which, while improvable through targeted prompting, often negatively impacts task performance,” a paper published at the end of last month said. The Register reports:
The Salesforce AI Research team argued that existing benchmarks failed to rigorously measure the capabilities or limitations of AI agents, and largely ignored an assessment of their ability to recognize sensitive information and adhere to appropriate data handling protocols.

The research unit’s CRMArena-Pro tool is fed a data pipeline of realistic synthetic data to populate a Salesforce organization, which serves as the sandbox environment. The agent takes user queries and decides between an API call or a response to the users to get more clarification or provide answers.

“These findings suggest a significant gap between current LLM capabilities and the multifaceted demands of real-world enterprise scenarios,” the paper said. […] AI agents might well be useful, however, organizations should be wary of banking on any benefits before they are proven.

What I’m seeing lately is this

By rsilvergun • Score: 3 Thread
When I first connect to a business for support they hand me over to a barely functional chatbot. If that doesn’t work they escalate me to another chatbot with more computing power behind it. If that doesn’t work there’s usually at least one more layer of chatbot before a human being. Sometimes two.

The entire thing is miserable as a customer but because we’ve had 40 plus years of market consolidation I don’t have a lot of options. I could shop at boutique places but they are usually 20 to 30% more not because they are small businesses but because they have to eke out a niche in order to survive and so they tend to sell more expensive stuff for specific purposes.

The end result is that any company I do business with has managed to use chatbots to reduce my interaction with their customer service reps by somewhere between 20 and 50%.

This mirrors what I see from coding LLMs

By Tony Isaac • Score: 3 Thread

I use GitHub Copilot frequently. It’s useful for a lot of small tasks that I spell out in detail. But anything that goes beyond one step or one logical leap, it flunks.

For example, when removing a parameter from a function signature, it’s not smart enough to locate that parameter in callers, or within the function itself. It suggests edits anyway, which (if I didn’t stop it) would destroy variables and values that I did NOT choose to delete. The point is, it takes a second level of logic to realize the ripple effects of removing a parameter from a function signature. LLMs are worse than useless with this kind of complexity, and that’s not really that complex.

So, all you developers who are worried about LLMs taking your jobs, relax. It’s nowhere near that level of sophistication, even if you are a junior developer.

The US Navy Is More Aggressively Telling Startups, ‘We Want You’

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from TechCrunch:
While Silicon Valley executives like those from Palantir, Meta, and OpenAI are grabbing headlines for trading their Brunello Cucinelli vests for Army Reserve uniforms, a quieter transformation has been underway in the U.S. Navy. How so? Well, the Navy’s chief technology officer, Justin Fanelli, says he has spent the last two and a half years cutting through the red tape and shrinking the protracted procurement cycles that once made working with the military a nightmare for startups. The efforts represent a less visible but potentially more meaningful remaking that aims to see the government move faster and be smarter about where it’s committing dollars.

“We’re more open for business and partnerships than we’ve ever been before,” Fanelli told TechCrunch in a recent episode of StrictlyVC Download. “We’re humble and listening more than before, and we recognize that if an organization shows us how we can do business differently, we want that to be a partnership.” Right now, many of these partnerships are being facilitated through what Fanelli calls the Navy’s innovation adoption kit, a series of frameworks and tools that aim to bridge the so-called Valley of Death, where promising tech dies on its path from prototype to production. “Your granddaddy’s government had a spaghetti chart for how to get in,” Fanelli said. “Now it’s a funnel, and we are saying, if you can show that you have outsized outcomes, then we want to designate you as an enterprise service.”

In one recent case, the Navy went from a Request for Proposal (RFP) to pilot deployment in under six months with Via, an eight-year-old, Somerville, Massachusetts-based cybersecurity startup that helps big organizations protect sensitive data and digital identities through, in part, decentralization, meaning the data isn’t stored in one central spot that can be hacked. (Another of Via’s clients is the U.S. Air Force.) The Navy’s new approach operates on what Fanelli calls a “horizon” model, borrowed and adapted from McKinsey’s innovation framework. Companies move through three phases: evaluation, structured piloting, and scaling to enterprise services. The key difference from traditional government contracting, Fanelli says, is that the Navy now leads with problems rather than predetermined solutions. “Instead of specifying, ‘Hey, we’d like this problem solved in a way that we’ve always had it,’ we just say, ‘We have a problem, who wants to solve this, and how will you solve it?’" Fanelli said.

Programmatics did not go away

By HBI • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

The real problem with military contracting is that you sell something in as an ONS purchase (operational needs statement) and it offers you next to nothing in terms of what will happen next time. The whole process repeats. This is like someone paying for a software license out of the petty cash fund. If you want to make a small amount of money on a one time only basis, this can work.

If you want to sell something to the “whole Army” or any other service, you get it into a program of record. But programs of record are line item funded by Congress, and have to pass operational tests. The tests are expensive and take forever. Then you have other companies and by extension, associated Beltway Bandit lobbying firms attacking your pot of funds. This amounts to a PhD type being paid to nitpick your program, attacking its viability on a purely scholarly basis. Their objective is to convince people in Congress to cut off your funding in favor of another firm.

I’ve been involved with programs every step of the way, including sitting in the aforementioned PhD’s offices somewhere in Fairfax County, VA, being plied for information to attack particular programs, while being paid by my own company.

An example of one program that hasn’t gone anywhere in 7 years, despite vigorous service advocacy, consider IVAS.

I feel for this guy but nothing is going to fix that system.

Obscure Chinese Stock Scams Dupe American Investors by the Thousands

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
Thousands of American investors have lost millions of dollars to sophisticated pump-and-dump schemes involving small Chinese companies listed on Nasdaq, prompting the Justice Department to declare the fraud a priority under the Trump administration’s white-collar enforcement program.

The scams recruit victims through social media ads and WhatsApp messages, directing them to purchase shares in obscure Chinese firms whose stock prices are artificially inflated before collapsing. Since 2020, nearly 60 China-based companies have conducted initial public offerings on Nasdaq raising $15 million or less each, with more than one-third experiencing sudden single-day price drops exceeding 50%. In one recent case, seven traders earned over $480 million by defrauding 600 victims who purchased shares in China Liberal Education Holdings.

A fool and his money…

By mspohr • Score: 3 Thread

What are people thinking?

“Investors”?

By hadleyburg • Score: 3 Thread

Those American “investors” were probably gambling rather than investing.

WTF?

By SlashbotAgent • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Who dafuq gets stock tips from social media ads and anonymous WhatsApp messages? They’d have better odds with lottery scratch-offs.

OpenAI, Growing Frustrated With Microsoft, Has Discussed Making Antitrust Complaints To Regulators

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
Tensions between OpenAI and Microsoft over the future of their famed AI partnership are flaring up. WSJ, minutes ago:
OpenAI wants to loosen Microsoft’s grip on its AI products and computing resources, and secure the tech giant’s blessing for its conversion into a for-profit company. Microsoft’s approval of the conversion is key to OpenAI’s ability to raise more money and go public.

But the negotiations have been so difficult that in recent weeks, OpenAI’s executives have discussed what they view as a nuclear option: accusing Microsoft of anticompetitive behavior during their partnership, people familiar with the matter said. That effort could involve seeking federal regulatory review of the terms of the contract for potential violations of antitrust law, as well as a public campaign, the people said.

Worked for Netscape and Novell, amirite?

By HBI • Score: 4, Funny Thread

I wish them luck.

Rock’em Sock’em Robots

By RitchCraft • Score: 3 Thread

Two big full of shit companies dueling it out. Over what? AI. Don’t care, let them crash and burn. Not even worthy of popping corn to watch.

Do not let

By wakeboarder • Score: 3 Thread

open AI be a for profit company. Do not.

That ‘Unsubscribe’ Button Could Be a Trap, Researchers Warn

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
Researchers are cautioning users against clicking unsubscribe links embedded in email bodies, citing new data showing such actions can expose recipients to malicious websites and confirm active email addresses to attackers. DNSFilter found that one in every 644 clicks on unsubscribe links leads users to potentially malicious websites.

“You’ve left the safe, structured environment of your email client and entered the open web,” TK Keanini, DNSFilter’s chief technology officer, told WSJ. The risks range from confirming to bad actors that an email address belongs to an active user to redirecting victims to fake websites designed to steal login credentials or install malware. Clicking such links “can make you a bigger target in the future,” said Michael Bargury, CTO of security company Zenity.

Re:Not only that…

By Monoman • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

If you put me on your list without asking, why should I trust you to take me off the list?

Block, always block.

I find it simply incredible

By Revek • Score: 5, Informative Thread
That this isn’t a common thought. The only thing I thought of when I read that headline was ‘No Shit!’.

Re:I find it simply incredible

By Vlad_the_Inhaler • Score: 4, Informative Thread

This was known 25 years ago.

Misfiled

By YuppieScum • Score: 3 Thread

This story should from the “no-shit-sherlock” dept.

Re:So

By 93 Escort Wagon • Score: 5, Funny Thread

For some reason, your post made me think of the following exchange from The IT Crowd.

Moss: My mum always says, you should never open the door.
Jen: What do you mean?
Moss: An unopened door is a happy door. So we never answer ours when someone knocks.
Jen: What, so you all just sit there?
Moss: Yes.
Jen: So the doorbell goes and you all just sit there until the person goes away?
Moss: Yes.
Jen: What if it’s important? What if it’s good news?
Moss: This is London, Jen. It’s not someone with cake! Unless that cake is made of dog poo and knives!

Dutch Court Confirms Apple Abused Dominant Position in Dating Apps

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
A Dutch court on Monday confirmed a 2021 consumer watchdog’s ruling saying that Apple had abused its dominant position by imposing unfair conditions on providers of dating apps in the App Store. From a report:
The Rotterdam District Court ruled that the Dutch Authority for Consumers and Markets (ACM) was therefore right to impose an order subject to a penalty for non-compliance. The court ruled that ACM was right in finding that dating app providers had to use Apple’s own payment system, were not allowed to refer to payment options outside the App Store, and had to pay a 30% commission (15% for small providers) to Apple.

Ony Subs Allowed In Dutchland?

By SlashbotAgent • Score: 4, Funny Thread

I thought the Dutch were more open and inclusive. This just seems like kink shaming.

Windows Hello Face Unlock No Longer Works in the Dark and Microsoft Says It’s Not a Bug

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
Microsoft has disabled Windows Hello’s ability to authenticate users in low-light environments through a recent security update that now requires both infrared sensors and color cameras to verify faces. The change forces the system to see a visible face through the webcam before completing authentication with IR sensors.

Windows Hello earlier relied solely on infrared sensors to create 3D facial scans, allowing the feature to work in complete darkness similar to iPhone’s Face ID. Microsoft pushed the dual-camera requirement to address a spoofing vulnerability in the biometric system.

Never use biotmetrics

By rtkluttz • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Biometrics can be forced by police. Passwords cannot. The only time biometrics should ever be used is somewhat as a 2nd factor but better as a 3rd factor for systems that support it. Each one protects against different vectors of abuse. Passwords are known but can be shared. Biometrics can be forced but cannot easily be shared. Physical tokens can be forced or stolen. Many other so called 2nd and 3rd factor authentication mechanisms are utilized because they allow companies to uniquely identify you as a person, so those should be avoided. Phone based codes for instance allows them to tie what is usually just a random username or account to a real physical human identity. Zero trust should always be the goal.

Password, biometrics, and tokens together equal someone that knows something,has something, and that that actual person is present but it does so in a way that does not necessarily have to tie a real human identity to that account. Even the biometrics without significant additional information cannot be tied to a real humans name, address, phone number etc. But I also believe that only password should be a requirement. The rest should always be up to the user. There are legitimate use cases where people NEED to allow other family members access to their accounts. That is 100% the decision of the owner of the account, not the company providing the account.

Re:Never use biotmetrics

By rtkluttz • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Clarification, on what I said above. The title says never use biometrics. That was meant to say never use biometrics ALONE.

Re:Never use biotmetrics

By thegarbz • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Adding: Passwords also work in the dark.

I can’t touch type you insensitive clod.

Next up

By rossdee • Score: 3 Thread

M$ issues specifications for webcams on laptops to have a built in flash.

Re:Never use biotmetrics

By StormReaver • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Biometrics can be forced by police.

So can passkeys, which makes them harmful.

Japan Builds Near $700 Million Fund To Lure Foreign Academic Talent

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot
An anonymous reader shares a report:
Japan is the latest nation hoping to tempt disgruntled US researchers alarmed by the Trump administration’s hostile attitude to academia to relocate to the Land of the Rising Sun. The Japanese government aims to create an elite research environment, and has detailed a $693 million package to attract researchers from abroad, including those from America who may have seen their budgets slashed or who fear a clampdown on their academic freedom.

Smart.

By Petersko • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

The US is in a rush to vilify anybody in STEM that actually knows what they’re doing. Other countries should try to capitalize on it. Just as other countries are capturing the export markets the US has historically served, they should also try to capture the intellectual capital.

It’s all a mess right now, but there are already glimpses of the future where winners are starting to emerge. The US isn’t among them.

Re:Inviting US academics into Japan?

By hjf • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

weeb is the only reason anyone would willingly live in Japan.

the cost of living is rising, and wages are obscenely low compared to the rest of the developed world. It may be attractive for south-east asian nurses and grunt work (of which Japan has plenty, but that’s not really something making headlines in the west), but Japan insists in demanding highly skilled professionals (no college degree = no visa) and compensation is ridiculous in comparison. If you’re a self-taught software developer, no matter how talented you are, you’re not getting a work visa unless a company hires you. But then again, no sane developer is going to work Japanese hours for japanese salaries.

Japan wants American talent, for which an american had to pay $200k, but wants to pay $30-35k/year. Not gonna happen.

Also Japan doesn’t provide any real path to permanent residence. All of those work visas are exclusively temporary. There is no exemption. There is no “but i’ve lived in this country for 30 years, what do you mean go back to my country? i have nothing there” exemption. And this is a very important problem: if you lived in japan and got a normal salary, you CAN’T afford a home back in your home country when japan kicks you out.

of course there are nuances to all of this but in general this is the situation in japan. Are there higher income jobs in japan? Yes, but they are for managers, and as a foreigner you’re unlikely to be promoted to those.