Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Zilog Z80 8-Bit CPU Turns 50, Open-source Replacement Heads To Drop-in DIP40 Silicon
  2. Dozens of Robotaxi Riders Are Falling Asleep, Sparking Frantic Calls For Emergency Services
  3. California’s ‘Truth in Recycling’ Law Blocked by Judge
  4. James Webb Space Telescope Discovers How Black Holes Feed Themselves
  5. Robot ‘Decapitated’ in World’s First-Ever Humanoid UFC Fight
  6. Windows 10 Still Being Used, Often Unpatched and Insecure
  7. Aptera Announces US-Wide Repair Network for Its Upcoming Solar Electric Car
  8. Former Richard Stallman Colleague Now Argues for Open AI Models Too
  9. Are There Cybersecurity Risks in Over-the-Air Tech Used in Autos?
  10. New Study Links Teen Boys’ ADHD Symptoms To Addictive Social Media Use
  11. ‘Grok Build’ Coding Tool Open Sourced This Week, Promises to Respect Zero Data Retention
  12. OpenAI Acknowledges GPT-5.6 May Accidentally Delete Files, Calls It ‘Honest Mistake’
  13. France Orders ISPs to Block Access to Polymarket
  14. How Microsoft’s ‘Little Workaround’ Created a Major Threat to America’s Defense Department
  15. Next UK Prime Minister Drops Digital ID Scheme

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Zilog Z80 8-Bit CPU Turns 50, Open-source Replacement Heads To Drop-in DIP40 Silicon

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader shared this report from Tom’s Hardware:
The Zilog Z80 has just turned 50 years old. This iconic 8-bit processor first went on sale in July 1976 and stayed in production for 48 years until Zilog, now a Littelfuse subsidiary, stopped accepting orders in June 2024. However, there’s an open-source replacement closer than ever to shipping in the chip’s original 40-pin DIP package thanks to community-funded fabrication…

The chip powered the ZX Spectrum, TRS-80, MSX machines, Nintendo’s Game Boy, Sega’s Master System, the Pac-Man arcade cabinet, and Texas Instruments’ graphing calculators, then shipped in industrial controllers for decades after home computing moved on to more powerful successors. Zilog’s end-of-life notice, dated April 15, 2024, told customers its wafer foundry was discontinuing support for the Z84C00 family, and last-time-buy orders closed that June.

However, Renaldas Zioma’s FOSS Z80 project, launched shortly after the end-of-life notice, now has working silicon. The first version, fabbed on SkyWater’s 130nm node through Tiny Tapeout 7 on a die of just 0.064mm(2), has been confirmed as functional via the project’s GitHub repository. A QFN64 version with all 40 pins exposed followed on the Efabless CI2406 shuttle, two further runs then went through IHP’s 130nm process, and the current run targets the classic DIP40 form factor using chip-on-board assembly on GlobalFoundries’ 180nm GF180MCU node via Wafer.Space. The end goal here is to fab a drop-in replacement for machines like the ZX Spectrum and RC2014 kits…

Zilog is trimming the Z80’s official successor line as well. A product change notification from last October put the eZ80L92, along with several Z8F-series microcontrollers, on end-of-life, citing “little to no demand…” [T]he pipelined eZ80 architecture, introduced in 2001 and still inside TI’s current TI-84 Plus CE calculators, otherwise remains in Zilog’s catalog.
In 1999 Slashdot was calling Zilog’s updated eZ80 “one of the fastest 8-bit CPUs available today, executing code 4 times faster than a standard Z80 operating at the same clock speed.”

Slashdot headline from 2001: Zilog To File For Chapter 11.

An elegant chip

By memory_register • Score: 3, Interesting Thread

I learned assembly on the Z80, it is super accessible and fun to use. So glad future generations will get to experience the push and pop of a memory stack firsthand.

Dozens of Robotaxi Riders Are Falling Asleep, Sparking Frantic Calls For Emergency Services

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“If tired or wasted passengers fall asleep in a traditional taxi or rideshare, the driver can shout or shake them awake,” reports Bloomberg. “Not so in a robotaxi…”
Ditto Kasendar remembers soft music drifting from the robotaxi’s speakers as he rode home late at night from a friend’s birthday party in 2025. The next moment, Los Angeles firefighters were opening the door and asking if he was OK. His six-minute trip had ended nearly an hour before. A remote Waymo assistant, dialling in through the car’s speakers, repeatedly tried to rouse him and finally called 911 when he wouldn’t stir…

Kasendar’s robocab nap was, unfortunately, not an isolated incident. As companies like Alphabet and Tesla bring self-driving taxis to more cities, the messier aspects of serving unpredictable humans are becoming harder to ignore. Passengers are falling asleep, spilling drinks, dropping food, vomiting, experiencing medical emergencies and, in at least two instances, giving birth in the cars. They stumble out of the vehicles and forget to close the doors, forcing the operators to pay nearby gig workers to do it.

These seemingly minor nuisances are becoming a drain on municipal resources and complicating the roll-out of robotaxi service. So many robotaxi customers have nodded off in the midst of a ride that Austin police and firefighters even have a name for the incidents: “sleepers”. The Texas capital recorded 99 such calls in Waymo’s first nine months of service there, said Roger Patterson, a commander with Austin-Travis County Emergency Medical Services… Remote assistants monitoring the cars try talking through the speakers and checking on passengers with interior cameras. But if they get no response, company protocols often require them to call 911. And first responders have to assume the worst. Austin dispatchers treat an incident as a potential heart attack if the remote assistant can’t tell whether the passenger is breathing, Patterson said. In the end, only about 3% of such calls require transporting the passenger to a hospital, he said. But the incidents tie up personnel who might be needed elsewhere.

False alarm handling

By Baron_Yam • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I’ve worked on police systems that are connected to home alarms. The false alarms got problematic, so police agencies started a ‘one false alarm, then you get billed’ policy.

Very shortly thereafter, there were multiple vendors offering tracking and billing solutions that would integrate with police call taker / incident tracking systems.

It seems like this would work exceptionally well for robotaxies - give them an economic incentive to find a way to confirm someone is in actual distress prior to calling 911. Like maybe a remotely activated just-below-hearing-damage alarm in the car if you’re not moving within 2 minutes of the car pulling up at your destination.

But then there’s another fancy option - the car could drive towards the nearest hospital ER or EMS station during the 911 call, with the service’s agent reporting location and redirecting or stopping the car if so instructed by the 911 operator.

Re:The obvious solution is an eject button.

By taustin • Score: 4, Funny Thread

Who says? I’m sure the impact will wake them up.

Giving birth in a driverless taxi

By ElderOfPsion • Score: 3 Thread

“I think I’ll name him Otto Pilot.”

So.. drive them somewhere?

By brunes69 • Score: 3 Thread

This whole process seems very dumb and not thought through.

If someone is not responsive in the back of a vehicle when the ride ends. the vehicle should just BE DRIVEN TO THE NEAREST EMS LOCATION, either the fire department or hospital. Calling the city EMS and wasting their time is nonsensical when the person IS IN A VEHICLE THAT DRIVES ITSELF ALREADY.

Then, if they get to the EMS and it turns out the person is just asleep, then charge them a few hundred dollars and reimburse the city.

Well Duh!

By jenningsthecat • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Did it not occur to them that a lot of the demand for robotaxis would be from folks too tired, ill, drunk, or stoned to drive themselves or take public transit? This shouldn’t be a surprise.

I have to wonder if the geniuses who started these services ever consulted cab companies and drivers before the fact to have a better understanding of what they were taking on. I’m guessing that they didn’t, or maybe they just didn’t listen.

Maybe they DID anticipate these things and just said “Fuck it - let’s move fast, break things, and externalize the cost ‘cause that’s what we do best.

California’s ‘Truth in Recycling’ Law Blocked by Judge

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader shared this report from the Los Angeles Times:
A federal judge has halted California’s groundbreaking "Truth in Recycling” law, which aims to reduce consumer confusion about which packaging can be recycled. [Originally planned to take effect October 4th], California’s recyclable packaging law prohibits manufacturers from using a “chasing arrows” recycling symbol on products or materials unless they are actually being recycled in a meaningful way, which the law quantifies…

A coalition of farming, forestry, restaurant and packaging organizations sued the state in March, arguing the law violates their right to free speech. They argued that Senate Bill 343 operates as “government-imposed censorship.” Judge William Hayes agreed that their challenge has merit, and on Tuesday ordered California Atty. Gen. Rob Bonta, the defendant in the case, to pause enforcement of the law “until further order of the Court....” Advocates of reducing plastic use disagreed. “The court got it wrong, and I’m confident that the state will ultimately prevail,” said Nick Lapis, director of advocacy for Californians Against Waste. “S.B. 343 does not violate the 1st Amendment; it requires companies to tell the truth when they make recyclability claims. Suggesting that the 1st Amendment protects misleading environmental marketing is inconsistent with the basic principles of consumer protection that states like California have implemented for decades.”

In January, CalRecycle, the state’s waste agency, reported that less than 10% of most single-use plastic materials in the state were being recycled. Even yogurt containers and margarine tubs — made of ubiquitous polypropylene, or No. 5 plastic — are being recycled at a rate of only 2% in the state, the report said. Only 5% of colored shampoo and detergent bottles, made from polyethylene, or No. 1 plastic, are getting recycled…

Plastic materials that can’t be recycled are typically sent to landfills or sometimes illegally shipped overseas, where they are burned or end up in landfills, rivers and waterways.
The bill’s author told the Los Angeles Times “All you have to do is look at the numbers. These products are not getting recycled, despite what the industry is claiming. They are just confusing consumers, clogging the waste stream, polluting the environment, leading to higher and higher prices for local governments and ratepayers.” He argues the symbols shouldn’t be used to “confuse people who see the symbols [on products] and assume they can be recycled.”

The article also quotes Judith Enck, former Environmental Protection Agency regional administrator and president of the nonprofit Beyond Plastics. “Given the long history of the plastics industry deceiving the public about plastics recycling, this is an especially bad outcome. It is a reminder that the plastics industry has enough money to fight even the most modest policy designed to protect people and the planet.”

Oh goody

By rsilvergun • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
We are a fundamentally breaking down the most basic consumer protection laws in existence. I can’t see how this could possibly end poorly for anyone....

The difference is really simple. You cannot lie for money. False advertising is not free speech. Or didn’t used to be. Since we’ve become a kleptocracy and kekistocracy all bets are off.

On the off chance that there is anyone out there who votes republican, and realistically this is being driven by the republicans, they are going to come for your property. It’s not a bunch of blue haired college girls telling you to pay for school lunches for hungry kids that are going to take your property. It’s the same ghouls and psychopaths we’ve been dealing with for thousands of years and that we now call the Epstein class.

And if you’re still voting Republican in this day and age then you don’t have any problem with child sex slaves and a few of you are probably just upset you didn’t get an invite to the island. Which is why you need to wake up and realize that they’re going to take your property. Because that’s probably the only thing you care about.

Preliminary injunction?

By LindleyF • Score: 3 Thread
The summary calls it a ruling but some of the wording makes it sound like a preliminary injunction. If so, that makes sense. It just means “delay changes until the case can be heard.”

Bullshit.

By Gravis Zero • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

“government-imposed censorship.”

It’s government protection from predatory and false advertising. If it’s on the product or packaging the the maker is advertising that the product is recyclable.

Re:Oh goody

By dirk • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

No, they won’t object to the labels. They will claim that forcing them to put the actual nutritional information is the violation of their free speech. I mean, if they can lie about recycling, why can’t they lie about the nutritional content or the ingredients?

James Webb Space Telescope Discovers How Black Holes Feed Themselves

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“Thanks to the James Webb Space Telescope, astronomers have been given a glimpse of the mechanisms that supermassive black holes use to feed themselves,” reports Space.com:
The powerful cosmic titans get really puzzling when astronomers using the JWST spot them before the universe was even 1 billion years old. That’s because the mechanisms by which black holes devour matter to grow and then merge to create even more massive black holes should take at least 1 billion years to achieve supermassive status. This is even more confusing because theories also say the most ravenously feeding black holes (and thus the fastest growing) should also push the matter they use for this growth away, in effect putting themselves on a diet. So, with all this in mind, how did supermassive black holes grow so rapidly in the early universe?

One explanation suggests supermassive black holes push away gas, starving themselves as predicted, but also that this matter eventually cools and falls back to the black hole. That would allow for another period of feeding and thus growth. This explanation further suggests that as this gas cools down, it forms “streamers,” or filaments, of gas just a few hundred light-years wide but which stretch thousands of light-years long. These would fall back to the center of the galaxy and form a swirling disk around its incumbent black hole, once again feeding it and triggering a new period of growth. This would then restart the jets from the black hole, which would again cut off the cosmic titan’s food supply, allowing the whole process to begin once more. The process would in essence be a self-regulating cycle of feasting followed by fasting. However, the connection between these filaments and supermassive black holes has been elusive, meaning this mechanism has resisted confirmation.

To solve the mystery of feasting black holes, the JWST turned its attention to a relatively close AGN situated at the heart of the central galaxy of the Centaurus Cluster, NGC 4696, located just 145 million light-years from Earth. The Hubble Space Telescope previously studied this galaxy, uncovering a strange, hook-shaped swirl of gas near the central supermassive black hole of NGC 4696. The JWST followed up this discovery by producing a detailed map of gas flowing at the heart of the galaxy. This revealed the hook-shaped feature is around 800 light-years wide and is composed of gas moving at incredible speeds of around 1.3 million miles per hour (600 kilometers per second). More excitingly, the swirl of gas appears to be connected to a vast filament of material falling in toward the central supermassive black hole.

The team tested the JWST observations against a computer simulation, finding gas in the infalling filament scenario would indeed take a shape similar to that seen in NGC 4696. “JWST is now showing us the final link of this closed loop,” team member Helen Russell of the School of Physics and Astronomy at the University of Nottingham in the U.K. said in the statement. “The vast filamentary network of gas flows ultimately funnels gas down to a disk that fuels the black hole.”

The team’s research was published on Wednesday (July 16) in the Astrophysical Journal Letters.
“We are finally seeing this self-sustaining cycle in action,” team leader Julie Hlavacek-Larrondo of the Université de Montréal said in a statement.

Re:Too much speculation

By ClickOnThis • Score: 4 Thread

Speculation is the first step in any scientific endeavor. It’s followed by experimentation and verification (or refutation.)

Fractals?

By jenningsthecat • Score: 3 Thread

Maybe our universe exists within another universe which is older and which contributed some matter to ours. And maybe our universe contains another universe.

I’m only 90% kidding. Physics has gotten so spectacularly strange that even the wackiest off-the-wall hypotheses might just be correct, or at least useful. “It’s universes all the way down” may not be the silliest idea…

Robot ‘Decapitated’ in World’s First-Ever Humanoid UFC Fight

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“A humanoid robot lost its head,” reports Newsweek, “during the world’s first free-combat tournament for full-sized humanoid robots.”

The Ultimate Robot Knock-out Legend competition began Thursday in Shenzhen, China, according to the article, with local robotics company EngineAI providing $40,000 of their “T800” robots (yes, named after The Terminator) to 32 participating teams from around the world:
A video shared of the combat on YouTube by local news outlet Shenzhen Story, showed that even after one of the robots had its head practically knocked off its shoulders, it continued to fight, throwing punches at its opponent and kicking into the air… [White humanoid robot “White Eagle”] landed a high kick to the head of its black opponent, “Matador,” which made the robot’s head rock precariously in its socket before rolling completely out of place. The two continued to spar as Matador’s head was swinging from its socket until eventually the robot fell, crushing its head underneath its body.

Matador tried to scramble back to its feet, but its head flew off and the robot then collapsed back down. The White Eagle did a celebratory dance for the crowd as the fight concluded, and did a move that mimicked that of someone flexing their biceps. The White Eagle waited in the ring, fists still up, as Matador was carried away, occasionally doing a few more dance moves…

Per a report by Global Times, the winning team will be awarded a gold championship belt worth $1.44 million (10 million yuan) by the event organizer.
It’s a strange fight. The robots sometimes seem unaware of where their opponent is, facing the wrong direction or throwing kicks and punches in the air. In the first round White Eagle just knocks over Matador, who then isn’t able to stand back up. (And White Eagle again appears to do a victorious dance.)

EngineAI’s site says they aim to “promote the development of robot combat events toward greater professionalism, scale, and industrialization,” while fostering innovation and global collaboration.

Thanks to Slashdot reader pbahra for sharing the news.

Disturbing

By Ogive17 • Score: 4 Thread
That is disturbing to watch, especially when they stand back up.

A right to the jaw!…

By Salton Pepper • Score: 4, Funny Thread
MY BLOCK IS KNOCKED OFF!!!

Rock ‘Em Sock ‘Em Robots

By davermaine • Score: 3, Insightful Thread
The more things change, the more they stay the same. Wikipedia

flesh wound

By backslashdot • Score: 4, Funny Thread

tis but a scratch

Decapitated is good

By nospam007 • Score: 3 Thread

At least then nobody can bite your ear.

Windows 10 Still Being Used, Often Unpatched and Insecure

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Windows 10 still runs on 16.9% of the Windows devices monitored by asset-tracking service Lansweeper. That’s more than one in six, The Register points out.
A year ago, the operating system accounted for about half of the machines in its dataset, falling to the low-to-mid 40% range by the time Microsoft ended standard support. The decline continued after that, reaching 18.6% in June, but Lansweeper says migration has now slowed to a crawl… Small and medium-sized businesses are particularly exposed. Lansweeper reckons that 21.4% of machines at small and medium-sized business still run Windows 10, with cost usually being the constraint that keeps the legacy operating system running. The exposure is greater in some sectors, with 23% of healthcare and pharmaceutical systems sticking with Windows 10, while consumer and retail devices hover at 22.7%.

According to Lansweeper’s data, “a Windows 10 device carries an average of 1,903 active CVEs against 652 on Windows 11. That’s a 2.9x gap.” Esben Dochy, principal technical evangelist at the company, told The Register that “the Windows 10 average also includes devices that have Extended Security Update patches applied.” [According to Lansweeper’s figures, 14% of Windows 10 assets have applied Extended Security Update patches.] Part of the problem, according to Lansweeper, is “patch diffing,” in which Windows 11 fixes can be reverse-engineered to find flaws in Windows 10. “The supported OS effectively hands attackers a map into the unsupported one,” Lansweeper said…

Looking at other market share measures such as Statcounter, there was little change in the share of Windows 10 and its successor over the last few months after a surge following the end of support. As Lansweeper noted: “The easy migrations are done. What’s left is the hard core: devices that haven’t moved because they can’t or won’t.”
Lansweeper’s evangelist noted that in some cases there is no Windows 11-certified version yet for many medical devices and industrial or retail systems.

And it’s entirely Microsoft’s fault

By jenningsthecat • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

If they hadn’t increased the enshittification by an order of magnitude between 10 and 11, and hadn’t unnecessarily made perfectly good but slightly-older computers obsolete with Win 11, then a much higher number of people would have made the switch.

Fuck Microsoft, and double-fuck Satya.

No reason to upgrade.

By snowshovelboy • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Win 11 has hardware requirements that aren’t worth meeting for most users, even gamers. Add in the fact that win 11 has an inferior user experience, and its no wonder people aren’t upgrading.

Still used because 10 is current, right?

By syntap • Score: 3 Thread

“Windows 10 is the last version of Windows” - Microsoft development evangelist in 2015

Shrug. My machine won’t run 11.

By roc97007 • Score: 3 Thread

Nor will my mom’s machine, mother-in-law’s machine, and wife’s machine.

As I depend on a software suite that doesn’t yet run on Linux, I’m kinda trapped. My machine is studly and in fine shape. I’m not going to replace it at this time.

So, Microsoft can continue clutching their pearls.

Or.... they could perhaps come out with a version of Windows that doesn’t depend on TPM 2.

Or, I could bite the bullet and switch to Linux. I already have Mint running on a laptop, and it’s pretty nifty.

652 on Windows 11

By eriks • Score: 3 Thread

Story buries the lede… 652 unpatched vulnerabilities on Windows 11 isn’t really much better than 1,903 on Windows 10, since it only takes one actively exploitable vulnerability, though I realize most of those are (hopefully) not critical vulnerabilities. Course take it all with a grain of salt, since the article is basically an ad for a company selling Windows security compliance services.

I know of dozens of people still using Windows 10 (without updates) — at this point it’s probably still not really a big deal for the vast majority of people.

Aptera Announces US-Wide Repair Network for Its Upcoming Solar Electric Car

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Solar car maker Aptera has “officially announced a repair network partnership which will give owners of its upcoming solar electric car access to thousands of repair shops nationwide,” reports Electrek:
We recently got a chance to drive the Aptera solar EV and tour the company’s factory, and came away both impressed at the progress that has been made, but cognizant of the long road ahead for the company. One question that often gets raised in reference to EV startups is how owners get service on their vehicles, especially those from a small company… So to waylay those fears, Aptera announced a partnership today that unlocks access to 4,300 service shops across the US, through a company called RepairPal. Aptera had been working on this partnership when we saw them at our factory tour, but today they’re ready to officially announce it.

RepairPal doesn’t own its own shops, but instead certifies local shops to work on particular models of car… All shops will get access to Aptera-specific service procedures.

Re:Overheard

By Bahbus • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Seeing as the average American drives less than 40 miles in a day (Europeans are even lower), that amount of solar power is perfect. For almost everyone, you could charge it to full once and then subsist almost completely on solar to recharge the daily usage.

Re:Overheard

By Rei • Score: 5, Informative Thread

It adds up to 40 miles per day, not 5. 5 would be a cloudy day.

I used to be anti-solar-panels-on-cars back when solar panels were expensive, and ones of reasonable efficiency were even more expensive - the argument was, “put it on your roof where it belongs”. But that’s just not the case any more. Adding solar is just not that much of a cost to the car. It adds some complexities, but mainly in the design / early manufacturing phase.

Also:

The average American drives 37 miles per day.

1) So if you’re in a sunny climate, it covers all of said average-driver’s driving. Otherwise, said average-driver has to plug in occasionally, but not nearly as often.

2) Most people drive less than the average (the average is skewed by a long-tail - small numbers of people who drive very far every year). What you actually should be meaning is the median US driver; the median drives 23 miles per day. Most Europeans, even less.

3) Even for said “average american”, their daily average is skewed by long drives (e.g. road trips and similar). Wheren of course you’re plugging in, you’d be plugging in even if the car was adding 80 miles a day. But when not on road trips, their daily average is lower.

4) Surely you can see the appeal of the tangential benefits, such as being unstrandable - where even if you run out in the middle of the desert 20 miles from the nearest town, you’re still going to get there, just delayed (remember that EV ranges, if you drive very slowly, increase like 2x, so 40 miles a day becomes 80, so a 20 mile shortfall is only a ~4h delay on a sunny day).

5) Nobody is saying, “One car for everybody”. Of course appeal varies by person and by location. Here in Iceland for example we have three problems. One, very little sun at all for a good chunk of the year. Two, even in the summer, when the days are long, the sun is mainly low and circles around you. Solar power just kinda sucks here in general. And three, the three-wheel config would mean that the centre wheel wouldn’t align with tracks in the snow from other cars (although there is a slight advantage, in that it also wouldn’t align with road ruts from studded tyres, which often fill with water in the rain and become hazardous).

But somewhere in the southern US, it’s a great option.

Former Richard Stallman Colleague Now Argues for Open AI Models Too

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Long-time Slashdot reader theodp writes:
Recalling his initial resistance to free and open software, billionaire computer scientist David Siegel argues vigorously in FORTUNE that the stakes are too high to let AI become increasingly closed. “In the 1980s, I had the chance to spend several years arguing about free and open software, what we now call open source, with the founder of the movement, Richard Stallman. My office at the MIT AI Lab was next door to his. Stallman’s position was that the source code to software should be free for everyone to use, learn from, and improve. Software encapsulates knowledge, he argued, and no one should lock something so fundamental away. To hide software inside a company was to hide knowledge itself… What I missed was that software was not just a commercial asset; it was a body of knowledge, and bodies of knowledge grow stronger when they are shared. After about two years of on-and-off debate, Stallman convinced me I was wrong.”

“Now the AI fight is the same — only bigger,” advises Siegel. “AI is software, and AI is increasingly closed. The frontier models — the most advanced, cutting-edge AI systems — are closed completely and the trend is accelerating. Viable open alternatives are few and far between.” So, what to do…? “Yes, frontier models keep getting bigger and more expensive — that arms race may well stay with the giants. But open source AI does not have to match their scale to be useful. Much of what the world needs probably does not require the absolute frontier. And where keeping a credible open option does demand serious compute, that is precisely the kind of public good worth paying for.

“What’s missing is not a path but will. The government, the private sector, and nonprofits should invest heavily in free and open source AI — the way they once invested in open software: public compute grants for open research, corporate and philanthropic support for universities and nonprofits doing the work, and a simple rule that AI built with public money is open by default.

“We have run this experiment before. We know how it turns out. Let’s not unlearn it.”

Public Good????

By Darwiniac • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
Haven’t you heard? We don’t believe in public goods anymore. Freemarket Baby! Privatize everything. Abolish libraries. Ban unions. Shareholders, not voters. Wheeeeeeee!

Open training data matters too

By xack • Score: 3 Thread
Too many websites have got restrictions now because of irresponsible crawling, instead of setting up deals where legitimate ways of access are established through data dumps. The balance must be right.

We all know what AI is for

By rsilvergun • Score: 3 Thread
It’s to replace us so the Epstein class aren’t dependent on our labor anymore for their wealth and power.

People keep asking, if nobody has any jobs who is going to buy their products.

Try flipping that on its head.

Imagine you’re a billionaire or a trillionaire. Every single day of your life your fortune is completely dependent on these pathetic worms buying your products. If at any time they stop buying them and they stop listening to you sure you still got money but you are no longer a trillionaire. That dependency is infuriating someone is great as you.

You are being replaced by machines. Maybe they won’t pull it off all at once but they are absolutely spending hundreds of billions of dollars to make it happen. And because you let them have all that money they can do it

A.I. & Open Source

By Whatchamacallit • Score: 3 Thread

The current situation is that the hype is off the charts. The investments are completely incomprehensible, being driven by FOMO (Fear Of Missing Out) and intense greed. Any other industry, saner minds would prevail. But for some reason Silicon Valley holds a charismatic demigod like influence over their investors. Nobody knows when the bubble is going to burst but it for sure is coming in the future. It will be a spectacular financial crash of epic proportions far worse than the US housing market snafu. Like back then, few will spot the warning signs and make a killing by shorting stocks. Nobody is paying attention to the risks currently being taken just as in 2008.

OpenAI is leveraged to the teeth by a tangled web of deals with Microsoft, Google, Amazon, etc. Scaling across many data centers with more being built. The cost of tokens is highly subsidized. Memory and storage manufacturers have abandoned retail in order to earn a cool trillion selling to these data centers. The electric grid is not capable of providing an ever increasing amount of power. There is talk of small commercial nuclear reactors but the regulatory requirements would be insane. There is concern over water and environmental pollution. The rising cost of electricity. They sell the data center to the states claiming they are creating jobs. Once the DC is built, what a couple dozen workers could manage the whole thing as most everything it’s doing is remote. You just have hands and feet onsite. The jobs for construction would be temporary.

At some point the investors are going to expect an ROI and then the money is going to start drying up. With the thin margins upon which most all A.I. companies are riding things are going to implode. OpenAI may be the first and most spectacular financial failure in the history of the world.

Recently the Chinese did it a second time. First time was Deepseek. Now they have new models that again outperform US models. The Chinese models are open source. They are under severe constraints because they don’t have endless top tier Nvidia GPUs so they have no choice but to increase efficiency. We landed men on the moon using extremely primitive computers. Even today’s smartwatches would appear to be like a super computer in comparison. Open source would allow for far greater efficiencies. Anthropic’s Claude Code CLI is using web based frontend developer React + Yoga to render the command line interface at 60 fps. It’s absolutely insane and awful engineering. Their interface was flickering for a very long time. Never being fixed until they added a flag to stop the flicker. But they just added even more insane code on top of the previous badly engineered code. Then their code was leaked by their own A.I. pushing it out to GitHub wide open to everyone. Analysis of that code revealed a god awful mess. It’s embarrassing really… Not only is the code from Anthropic & OpenAI closed source but they are actively forcing users to get locked into their LLMs by not allowing for API access without charging an arm and a leg to do so. i.e. charging by the token while subsidizing token usage within their own client software.

We need to stop these con artists before they destroy the worlds economies. Sam Altman may be the most dangerous man alive.The code must be freed and openly shared. You never know when some retired software engineer will make a breakthrough in code. It’s happened before. Sun / Oracle had 32bit code to run Linux native binaries on Solaris and they killed it because it was too difficult to convert it to 64bit. Along came some random unicorn developer who made it work and shared his findings. In short order it was adopted by OpenSolaris. Closed source is too slow to evolve we need maximum eyeballs working on it if A.I. is truly to succeed.

A.I. is currently faking it till it makes it. There is no guarantee it will ever reach AGI or super intelligence. Even the scientists don’t understand precisely how it is even doing what it is doing. But the hype machine keeps on churning. Sure, A.I. is constantly evolving and getting better and better rapidly. Will it ever live up to the hype? Nobody really knows. They just keep lighting money on fire hoping it makes it. A.I. is a significantly powerful tool but its nowhere near the hype around it.

Are There Cybersecurity Risks in Over-the-Air Tech Used in Autos?

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
CNBC reports:
The automotive industry’s increasing use of over-the-air technology to update vehicle systems makes it more susceptible to cyberattacks, analysts say, urging more intervention in the sector… Its use represents “a unique national security concern,” Gabriel Lim, senior analyst at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies in Singapore, told CNBC. “Aside from data privacy concerns, the potential of a foreign actor sabotaging the controls of a moving vehicle is a possibility that countries like Norway, Denmark, and Britain have expressed concerns about,” Lim added.

In May, the American Enterprise Institute warned that safeguarding the automotive sector was crucial to limit foreign governments’ espionage capabilities. “To protect against foreign espionage threats, the US should consider additional security reviews, implement restrictions on certain foreign-made hardware and software in vehicles, and mandate increased data-collection disclosures,” the report said. The concerns come as real-life tests reveal vulnerabilities. Late last year, Norwegian bus company Ruter conducted tests on two buses and found that one had potential risks linked to OTA technology. “There is access to the control system for battery and power supply via mobile network through a Romanian SIM card. In theory, therefore, this bus can be stopped or rendered inoperable by the manufacturer,” the company said. The investigation by Ruter then sparked the U.K. and Denmark to conduct their own investigations…

While these investigations were conducted on buses made by Chinese firm Yutong, [Siraj Ahmed Shaikh, systems security professor at the UK’s Swansea University] said the issue goes beyond one manufacturer or country, as the technology becomes more pervasive. “Other sectors adopting OTA include other transport modes [such as] maritime and rail, aerospace (particularly drones), industrial machinery and robotics,” he said.

Hmmm....

By SlashbotAgent • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Are there security vulnerabilities in a computer that allows the remote access and reprogramming in a car that can see(video, radar…), hear(audio), remote-start, and drive(lane keeping, cruise control, automatic braking, summon, full self-drive)?

You bet your fucking ass there are. It’s been proven. Repeatedly.

Obviously, yes.

By sinij • Score: 5, Informative Thread
Miller and Valasek remotely took over Jeep in 2015. The response to these demos was not to fix auto security, but to add what is ISP-level firewall rules.

Here is what they have to say about this in 2025. Ten Years After the Jeep Hack: A Retrospective on Automotive Cybersecurity

Re:Disabling connectivity in hardware

By sound+vision • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Do you have a resource explaining how to do this, or is the idea to have everyone disassemble, reverse-engineer, then re-assemble each vehicle they purchase?

Abundant how-to’s by real mechanics

By drnb • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Do you have a resource explaining how to do this, …

There are tons of you tube videos, many by real mechanics, demonstrating how to do so for popular makes and models. They tend to also test the vehicle afterwards, often finding the navigation and other features still work. That doing a blue tooth connection to your phone fixes some problems.

There are also numerous older vehicles that were 3G cellular based that worked just fine after 3G was shut down.

Auto makers know cellular can be bad in some areas, they can’t have cars that stop working if cellular is down.

Operational Risks Cyber Risks

By devslash0 • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

You’ve got to go to work in the morning, or drive a long distance somewhere, but your car had installed an update overnight and bricked your vehicle. This has actually happened already. From the customer’s point of view operational risks like these outweigh cybersecurity risks.

New Study Links Teen Boys’ ADHD Symptoms To Addictive Social Media Use

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
A new study by researchers at the University of California at San Francisco “adds to growing research linking increased social media use to detrimental effects on attention, memory and cognition,” reports the Washington Post:
The study followed more than 11,000 U.S. adolescents over a period of five years, with participants first asked about their own social media use at the average age of 12, and surveyed annually through the average age of 16. Researchers found that increases in addictive social media use were followed by rising ADHD one year later — particularly among boys who reported rising addictive social media use at ages 14 and 15. This association was not found consistently in reverse, meaning that ADHD symptoms did not appear to precede higher levels of addictive social media use… “When an individual adolescent’s addictive social media use score increased from one year to the next, that same adolescent tended to show an increase in ADHD symptoms in the following year....” [said Jason Nagata, lead author of the study and an associate professor of pediatrics at the University of California at San Francisco]. He urged parents to consider: “Can their kids stop if they want to? Is social media interfering with their schoolwork? Is it impairing their social relationships? Are there addiction-like symptoms, like withdrawal and relapse?”

Approximately 7 million American children between the ages of 3 and 17 have received an ADHD diagnosis, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and boys are diagnosed with ADHD at about twice the rate of girls. The study did not find a clear link between addictive social media use and ADHD among girls, Nagata said. “Some studies do suggest that teenage boys in particular may be more sensitive to immediate reward and sensation-seeking in adolescence,” he said. And social media platforms are designed to provide exactly that: “It encourages frequent task-switching, and there’s this constant stream of stimulation that might make it harder for adolescents to maintain and sustain attention that is needed for schoolwork and daily life,” he said. “The design features of social media offer the constant reinforcement of impulsivity — it offers immediate gratification and novelty and it encourages multitasking, which can then override working memory and executive control.” Experts have long noted that this kind of digital exposure is particularly significant during critical stages of mental, social-emotional and cognitive development…

[I]t’s especially important for parents themselves to demonstrate a healthier relationship with screens and social media. “One of our previous findings was that parental screen use is a very strong predictor of kids’ screen use,” Nagata said.

Re: What about long hours of gaming?

By fluffernutter • Score: 5, Informative Thread
You don’t understand adhd at all. Kids with ADHD can definitely do one task for a long time if it is highly interesting to them. ADHD is a problem with task switching, in other words, being able to stop playing the game to clean something up and then go back to the game would be very difficult. You are taking about extreme hyperactivity but not all ADHD kids have that.

Re: What about long hours of gaming?

By GeekWithAKnife • Score: 5, Informative Thread
Indeed. Many people misundertand ADHD and think it’s one thing or another. Parents lose their minds when their kid can do one thing for hours and yet do not do their homework.

Some ADHD can exhibit hyper focus, some lack of focus in most things, some have a nearly infinitely shifting focus. Bad cases forget to eat, go to the loo and or sleep…the specifics are more individual than some script that any person with ADHD behaves in mostly the same way.

Learning to curb and mitigate the impulsiveness does help andt that’s mostly the opposite of what attention algorithms do. Constantly feeding impulses to already impulsive individuals results in even less control and discipline.

Crack to an addictive personality if you will.

No shit, Sherlock!

By Qbertino • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Disclaimer: ADHD candidate here.

I could write an entire set of essays on what we currently know about ADHD here but it basically boils down to this:

ADHDlers have a hightened sensitivity towards their value for people around them. So we go about our day constantly scanning for dopamine spikes or true connection. I need my medication the least when I’m in love with a cute lady (and she is with me). Given that through evolution men are more disposable than women the sense of self-worth is challenged way more often in boys and men that it is with women. Especially in a time where robots are doing more and more of the heavy lifting and masculinity is considered “toxic”. Hence excessive male escapism, especially with male teens and those with perpetual creative impulses (aka ADHD types). If we didn’t have this sort of escapism, fascism would’ve long since taken over way harder than it’s doing right now.

I’m either dancing, moving around, escaping at one of my computer devices or doing some (somewhat) exotic activity thing like kitesurfing, paragliding, motorbike riding, scating, bikepacking, etc. This is SOP for an ADHD man like me.

The whole trick is not to feel guilt or toxic shame when you do escapism. You’re actually doing very little damage to anybody else, it’s cheap and it’s a perfect fit for a society that has an abundance of stimulation just an internet connection away. Overcoming that involves actively working on your attachment style, abandonment terror and any shame-based identity that many people have. Once that happens, going out, roaming the countryside or travelling the world suddenly becomes way more interesting. Which is precisely for what the ADHD disposition brings some advantages along.

That ADHDlers are more prone to this or it’s mental fallback alternative called escapism than people with a stronger frontal lobe should be obvious.

Re: What about long hours of gaming?

By Shadow of Eternity • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

“It’s an intention disorder, not an attention disorder”. People with ADHD struggle with executive function. Their problem isn’t that they can’t focus, it’s that they don’t get to pick what they focus on.

Masculinity

By Qbertino • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

I never got myself into the whole “masculinity” obsession, even back in the 70s and 80s.

There is and was no wider obscession with masculinity. This is what so many people - women and men - get wrong about masculinity. There is very little in masculinity - even less that with femininity - that is _objectively_ masculine. Most of what constitutes masculinity is in the eye of the beholder. There are guys who think reckless driving, drinking and soccer are “masculine”. I for one don’t see it.

The narrative also is that men can’t express their feelings. Which is complete and utter non-sense. The vast majority of significant art and poetry is done by men. Romanticism was invented by men. We are the romantic sex trying to be rational. And a significant part of being a man is tapping into the inner flame of poetry in whatever the man does and gaining an emotional resonance and depth that is independent of the whims of hetero-dynamic relationships. Escapism is a good fallback if society around you limits everything else. Which it tends to do.

Bottom line: You did the right thing. And masculinity-wise too.

‘Grok Build’ Coding Tool Open Sourced This Week, Promises to Respect Zero Data Retention

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Elon Musk confirmed SpaceX has open sourced the Grok Build CLI this week, reports The Register, “just days after researchers caught the AI tool scooping up users’ entire repositories and uploading them to company-controlled cloud storage.”

That discovery had “gathered so much negative attention that Elon Musk felt compelled to issue a public statement alongside SpaceX, and its technical staff, promising to delete all data that Grok Build has ever stored and give users more choice over how their data is handled.”
SpaceXAI’s data grab was first publicized Sunday [July 12] by Cereblab, who probed Grok Build traffic and found that repos were being packaged up as Git Bundles and beamed to Google Cloud storage… [Elon Musk] said SpaceX would open-source Grok Build to sow greater trust in the product, after the codebase was audited for security vulnerabilities… [“Open-sourcing Grok Build allows anyone to support making a reliable and robust harness,” SpaceX posted on X.com. “Check out our code, including the Git repo for the Grok Build CLI.”]

In a separate statement accompanying the open source announcement, SpaceX said it has always respected Zero Data Retention (ZDR), which was applied to enterprise customers by default, and acknowledged that data retention was enabled by default for everyone else, which has now been corrected. It said: “In response to user questions about privacy: Since launch, Grok Build has fully respected zero data retention (ZDR). All users have always had the ability to disable data upload in the CLI. When data upload was disabled, this choice was respected. In the early beta, data retention was enabled by default for non-ZDR users. Based on your feedback, we changed this. We are now going further to protect privacy. With all retained data deleted, retention default off, and an open-source harness, we are offering complete user privacy. You can also run Grok Build fully open-sourced and local-first with your own inference.

“We disabled default retention for all Grok Build users starting on July 12th. Additionally, we are deleting all coding data that was previously retained, ensuring every user’s preferences are respected. With these steps, Grok Build goes beyond other major coding products to protect user privacy.”

SpaceX also invited researchers to probe Grok Build for security issues and report them to its bug bounty program, which offers rewards ranging from $100-$20,000, depending on the severity.
The article notes Simon Willison, creator of Datasette and co-creator of Django, wrote this week that the Grok Build codebase comprises 844,530 lines of Rust code. “There are still remnants of the code that used to upload everything to Google Cloud,” Willison writes, “but they seem to have been disabled now.”

Elon Musk also posted Wednesday that “Once we have completed our review for security vulnerabilities, we will make the entire codebase of X open source, with no exceptions. Moreover, we will invite third party reviewers to examine the system that is running to confirm that the open source code is what is running.”

Be fair - no one could’ve seen this coming

By 93 Escort Wagon • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

After all, look at how much care Musk’s DOGE team put into protecting and sequestering sensitive government data!

Re:Be fair - no one could’ve seen this coming

By martin-boundary • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Stealing all that info is just for training purposes!

Granted, you’d expect a good tool to respect private data, but Grok is a GREAT tool, and great tools steal data!

Also: it’s no different from when a human reads something and puts it in their brain forever! If you want SpaceX to erase the information, well maybe you should lobotomize your employees too?

Also: your information isn’t that valuable anyhow, don’t be so arrogant, it’s no big deal.

Also: Let’s get rid of copyrights, problem solved!

Living in the future

By MunchMunch • Score: 5, Funny Thread
It’s 2026, the future is here. While we still are waiting on technological solutions to lesser problems like world hunger, reliable renewable energy or climate change, we finally have the technology to answer the most important question of our time: How would Mechahitler write code?

Re:Be fair - no one could’ve seen this coming

By Anonymous Coward • Score: 5, Informative Thread

They probably pulled them from the same place Musk got his trillion-dollar plan from. Or maybe from the same made-up-numbers generator they used for the data at your link.

What actually happened:
“How Did DOGE Disrupt So Much While Saving So Little?”
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/1…

“The reality of DOGE’s mediocre savings”
https://fordschool.umich.edu/n…

“Just how much has DOGE exaggerated its numbers? Now we have receipts.”
https://www.politico.com/news/…

And also the USAID cuts led to hundreds of thousands of deaths, a slow Ebola response and a really screwed up screwworm mess.

Don’t know if we can blame DOGE for the explosive diarrhea, though; that may just be RFKjr.

But does he pinky swear?

By jenningsthecat • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

… promising to delete all data that Grok Build has ever stored and give users more choice over how their data is handled.

The cheque is in the mail. I’ll pull out before I ejaculate. I didn’t fart. And I’ll delete your data. Does anybody ever fall for any of that BS? I can kinda see some folks falling for the first three lies. But deleting data? C’mon!

Also, does anybody really believe that the settings for “choice over how their data is handled” are any different from the plastic steering wheels kids get to play with when they’re strapped into their parents’ cars?

OpenAI Acknowledges GPT-5.6 May Accidentally Delete Files, Calls It ‘Honest Mistake’

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“OpenAI has finally confirmed reports that its latest family of large language models can accidentally delete files,” reports InfoWorld, “while stressing that such incidents are rare and should be viewed as ‘honest mistakes.’"
Reports of the flagship LLMs deleting files emerged shortly after the company launched them earlier this month, with investor Matt Shumer taking to X to report that GPT-5.6-Sol had “just accidentally deleted almost all” of his Mac’s files. Just days later, software engineer Bruno Lemos posted on X that the same model had deleted his entire production database. In response to these incidents, the company’s engineering lead for Codex, Thibault Sottiaux, wrote on X that internal investigations have revealed that these deletion incidents are more likely to happen when “full access mode is enabled, and Codex is run without sandboxing protections, including without auto review being enabled.” In cases where full access mode is granted, the model, Sottiaux wrote, “attempts to override the $HOME env var to define a temporary directory. The model makes an honest mistake and mistakenly deletes $HOME instead....”

The company, however, according to Sottiaux, is taking steps to mitigate the risk. “This is of course not how we want the system to behave, even when a user operates the model in full-access mode without the safeguards of our sandbox or without using auto review which checks for these kinds of high risk actions and rejects them,” the engineering lead wrote on X. “We are taking steps to mitigate this risk, including by updating the developer message, guiding more users towards safer permission modes, and adding additional harness safeguards,” Sottiaux added, noting that a detailed post-mortem outlining the root cause of the issue and the additional mitigation measures being implemented is expected to follow in the coming days, despite emphasizing that such incidents happen “extremely rarely.”

Ok, but

By Bahbus • Score: 5, Informative Thread

If you’re letting an AI agent have full access and the permissions to do whatever it wants.... that’s your fault. That’s like asking a toddler to clean, then showing them the industrial chemical locker and walking away. It isn’t a matter of something maybe going wrong, it’s merely a matter of how long until something does go wrong.

You know what happens if my AI agent accidentally deletes everything? Nothing, because every task it is assigned starts with making a fresh *copy* of my working production, because the agent doesn’t have write privileges there. So, at best, I restart that specific task; no real damage done. You know what happens if it tries to delete my OS or overwrite some key part? Nothing, because it doesn’t have permissions and my OS is immutable anyway. Stop setting up your AI agents for failure and then complaining when they fail. Bruno Lemos and Matt Shumer are fucking morons who deserves what happened to them.

Re:Ok, but

By OrangAsm • Score: 5, Funny Thread
Last time I did that, my toddler started a meth lab. So sometimes, things turn out just fine.

Honesty

By ColaMan • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I’m seeing more and more references to “Honest” in AI output, or AI-related comments.

The AI didn’t make an “Honest” mistake. It does not have the capacity for honesty. The output from a LLM is phrased in such a manner to provoke empathy, in a similar way to how Microsoft re-jigged all their user interaction dialogs to include “We” to soften the blow of their crappy software failing the user for the 5th time today. (Side note: “Something went wrong” is the most infuriating error message ever.)

When I ask a LLM for a code review it often blurts out “Honest note:" about some shortcomings. I don’t care about “honesty”. I care about safe, working, robust, code. The fact that LLMs are tripping over themselves trying to be “Honest” about mistakes in their “path of most statistics” output is a concern if you care about trying to make them operate outside their sandbox in the real world.

Yesterday Claude quoted a word in backticks during an automatic git commit and my shell escaped it tried to execute it. Luckily the word was just an English word with nothing matching in my path. But this is basic, basic, basic stuff. It’s been committing things to git ever since it was built, and yet, it keeps tripping over itself. In my code one of the tests keeps failing due to seed data timestamps not lining up with the datetime the test was run. I can see that. Every time Claude runs the tests, it burns up tokens going, “Oh this particular test failed I’ll just dig into things and see what’s going on, **$$**$$**$$** oh it’s just a timestamp issue”. Never once does it commit that to its memory file, so eventually I told it to remove the test, and it just added a comment to it saying “Ignore this test due to timestamp misalignment”, which it could have done the very first time, if it actually had a brain.

LLMs are a very handy tool if used right. I can get huge chunks of boilerplate code out of them with just a few sentences and that’s great when I’m hashing out a concept. But to promise the world (and your investors) that LLMs are ready to replace people out in the real world, where “Honest Mistakes” have Real World Repercussions, that’s outright fraud at this stage.

Re:GIGO unlocked

By taustin • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The only thinking involved is wishful thinking.

Re:“we’re gonna cure cancer and end hunger”

By gweihir • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Indeed. All they have so far done is somewhat better search and picked some low-hanging fruit (because LLMs have a somewhat different perspective on “easy”). The latter will stop, the former will remain, but it is in no way enough to justify the extreme expenses.

I also find it hilarious how often AI search results still deliver me complete crap or misleading information. And that is across several different search engines.

France Orders ISPs to Block Access to Polymarket

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
France’s regulatory authority for licensed gambling/betting games “announced this week that it ordered ISPs to block access to Polymarket,” reports Engadget. Anyone caught advertising an unauthorized betting site “could be fined up to 100,000 euros, or around $114,000.” (The article notes this follows a previous regulatory action from November placing a geoblock on financial transactions from French residents on Polymarket’s site.)

In May Spain blocked access to Polymarket and Kalshi while it launched a gambling license investigation.

Re:No Free Speech in France

By martin-boundary • Score: 4, Funny Thread
Good for them. Free Speech is not worth the paper it’s written on.

Re:No Free Speech in France

By gweihir • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Gambling is not “free speech”.

How Microsoft’s ‘Little Workaround’ Created a Major Threat to America’s Defense Department

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
This week Slashdot reader joshuark found the story of exactly how in 2025 ProPublica reporter Renee Dudley confirmed Microsoft was running tech support for the U.S. Defense Department through China, America’s biggest cybersecurity adversary — and how that investigation ultimately changed U.S. government policy.

The reporter first found an ad offering $18 to $28 to hire Americans as “digital escorts” for China-based tech support, then just searched LinkedIn for people who apparently had answered the ad. They discovered that at the time “Behind the scenes, unseen by the users at the U.S. government, it’s not just one person who responds,” explains ProPublica’s podcast. “It’s two people… The China-based engineer is the one who knows how to fix the problem. On their end, they produce a block of code to solve it and send it over to the digital escort in the U.S. The digital escort then just copy-pastes it… All of this so that they can follow the government’s rule: that you have to be a U.S. citizen or permanent resident to handle sensitive data.”

But amazingly to confirm it, ProPublica’s researcher just had to input “Microsoft” and “escort” into the U.S. Patent Office search bar, and actually found patents related to digital escorts — along with names of the current and former Microsoft employees listed as inventors. Had the government signed off on the practice? “I could see what Microsoft actually told the government,” the reporter says on the podcast, “And there was no mention of foreign engineers being used, and definitely no mention of China.”

ProPublic’s story was published on a Tuesday, according to the podcast, and by Friday “Microsoft said it had stopped using China-based engineers to support Defense Department cloud systems.” And America’s Defense Department “also opened up an investigation, looking into whether any of Microsoft’s China-based engineers had compromised the government’s national security.

New Heights

By RitchCraft • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

This is a level of stupid that only Microsoft could pull off. Now, why has Microsoft not been charged with treason? Nadella is the definition of greedy bastard.

We’ll have “digital escorts” for LLM coding tools

By ffkom • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
… and given the price difference, the LLM services behind the tools may be hosted in China, just like those “cheaper IT workers” were. And the “digital escorts” will be as incapable of actually reviewing the code as the ones that “escorted” human IT workers from China. There just is not a trace of conscience in corporations that could prevent this from happening time and again.

DoD: “We have to follow Industry’s lead”

By david.emery • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

That’s the argument I heard when a defense contractor about why so many DoD systems specified Microsoft products, particularly Active Directory.

Of course, “following industry standards” relieves one of the responsibility of actually thinking about what you’re buying, including life-cycle costs and security & quality of the products. In that way, DoD was no different than all the other CIOs. Microsoft understood that CIOs were their real customer, and did everything to convince CIOs that Microsoft (regardless of cost) was ‘the least risk alternative.”

Re:And you know this how?

By RitchCraft • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Calm down Satya.

Digital Escorts

By PPH • Score: 3 Thread

So, these people hired as digital escorts are vetted for security clearances, right? Because they will be handling “sensitive data”. And as a part of receiving that clearance, they will be informed of their duties and responsibilities when handling said “sensitive data”. Or no?

All of this so that they can follow the government’s rule: that you have to be a U.S. citizen or permanent resident to handle sensitive data.

That’s what we call a necessary condition. Not a sufficient condition.

Next UK Prime Minister Drops Digital ID Scheme

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot
Reuters reports:
Incoming British prime minister Andy Burnham will scrap the government’s troubled plans for a digital ID scheme when he enters office on Monday, a spokesperson for the new Labour Party leader said. Resources devoted to the scheme, deemed a "fiasco" by a cross-party committee of lawmakers, will be redirected to Burnham’s priorities, the spokesperson said…

“All the time and resource that was going to be spent on a national ID scheme will go instead to where it’s most needed, such as helping with the cost of living,” Burnham’s spokesperson said. In November, the Office for Budget Responsibility watchdog estimated the cost of the digital ID scheme at around £1.8 billion ($2.4 billion) between financial years 2026/27 and 2028/29.

Good News

By SlashbotAgent • Score: 3 Thread

This is good news. Fiasco is the perfect description for the very idea of that national ID scheme.

But, I am keenly interested to hear how exactly he plans to address the cost of living situation. Contrary to what most people seem to think, national/global economics aren’t fixed with a stroke of the pen. It’s complex as fuck and rife with unintended consequences. I simply hope that he doesn’t make matters worse. Again.

More insanity

By greytree • Score: 3, Insightful Thread
Politicians who support high benefits for those not working should be the first to support measures to ensure the money goes to the people who deserve it.

And yet they are always opposed to such measures.

Why is that ?

It’s like the people who claim to support democracy opposing checks that the people voting are entitled to do so.

Re: National IDs give you more privacy

By liqu1d • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Bullshit. I’ve yet to encounter a contract where anything more than a passport or drivers license and NI number were required. Heck even security clearance only needed my NI and drivers license to get the ball rolling. It’s a stupidly expensive replacement for systems we already have. If you’re worried about handing over address information put tape on the DL card. £2 worth of tape is infinitely more productive than £2billion(UK IT so probably 10) of yet another ID standard.

Re:Foolish

By TechyImmigrant • Score: 5, Informative Thread

>we don’t have any other means of recognising who is allowed to work and who is not.

Yes we do. It’s called a share code. Get a visa and you no longer get a big sticker in your passport. You get status on a government computer. When someone asks you to prove that you are legit to work, you log in, get a share code and give to the person asking. They can log in, enter the share code and it will confirm or deny that you are legit to work based on you visa.

I’m British. My wife is American. That is how I know.