Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. First Thorium Nuclear Clocks Begin to Tick
  2. AI Surveillance Startup Flock To Cut Several Hundred Jobs Amid Backlash, Sources Say
  3. Cloudflare Keeps 1.1.1.1 Out of Piracy Blocking, Escapes Penalties In France
  4. A 1960 Paper Published In Science Predicts World Will End Next Month
  5. Apollo Software Pioneer Margaret Hamilton Dies at 90
  6. US Bars Microsoft, Adobe, and Major IT Firms From Green Card Program
  7. Emmy Awards Leave Broadcast TV For Prime Video
  8. Female AI Agents ‘Paid’ Less Than Males, Study Finds
  9. Chrome 155 Ships Decoding Support For JPEG XL
  10. OpenAI Unleashes Hundreds More Math Results Upon a Field Already In Shock
  11. Campus Censorship Wars, 25 Years After a Slashdot Q&A
  12. Google, Unity Launch Platform To Create Video Games From Prompts
  13. Microsoft and Nvidia Unveil Surface Laptop Ultra For $2,599
  14. Xbox Secures Exclusive GTA 6 Streaming Rights
  15. Francis Halzen Wins Nobel Physics Prize For Antarctic ‘Ghost Particle’ Hunt

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

First Thorium Nuclear Clocks Begin to Tick

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Researchers in Vienna and Beijing have independently built the first nuclear clocks based on oscillations inside thorium nuclei, marking a major milestone for a field that could eventually produce highly portable, ultra-precise timekeepers. The clocks are already precise enough to lose only about a second over millions of years. The New York Times reports:
The first nuclear clocks are not going to immediately supplant the worldwide network of atomic clocks, whose steady ticking we rely on for GPS and the definition of a second. Nor have they captured the record for most precise timepiece; the best atomic clocks are about 10,000 times more reliable and would take more than 100 billion years to lose one second.

But nuclear clocks hold a bevy of potential advantages over existing atomic clocks. One day, they could be more reliable than the leading atomic versions, and nuclear clocks could be made more portable. They even hold the ability to search for certain kinds of dark matter — the invisible stuff whose clumps make up 83 percent of the matter in the universe. If a particle of dark matter passed through the thorium nuclei, it could register as a wobble in the nuclear clock’s otherwise steady ticktock.
The findings have been published in the journal Nature.

Re:83%, you say?

By ArchieBunker • • Score: 4, Informative • Thread

Its pretty impressive that we can manage to get millions in taxpayer funding over decades of study,

You really want to go down that road? Let’s begin with the Gulf War 3.0.

Summary misses the coolest details

By necro81 • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
Atomic clocks work using the energy transitions between different electron orbitals. Nuclear clocks work by using energy transitions within the nucleus itself - the difference between the lowest energy arrangement of the protons+neutrons and excited states (isomers).

Normally you need a serious punch to get a nucleus into an excited state: x-rays, gamma rays, or bombardment with energic particles. It so happens that thorium-229 requires the lowest energy to get to an excited state, and that can be achieved with deep-UV (148 nm) light. Laser light at that wavelength has only recently become possible. Also: Th-229 does not really exist in nature, you have to extract it from the decay of U-235, which itself has low natural abundance.

So it’s pretty cool stuff, and this first demonstration hints at what could be possible in the future. Atomic clocks use light in the microwave range; this nuclear clock uses light in a frequency band five orders or magnitude higher, and so could theoretically have that much greater precision. And because the fundamental phenomenon occurs in the nucleus rather than the electron cloud, it’s much less susceptible to external interference.

Re:I want a nuclear wrist watch

By coofercat • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

I seem to remember a scene in Dr. No where James Bond is using a geiger counter which keeps reading high until he takes off his watch.

Back in the day they used all kinds to make ‘glow in the dark’, nowadays it’s a lot safer ;-)

Re:83%, you say?

By Mr. Dollar Ton • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

Do you want me to ask how many tax breaks come in the form of billionaire donations to science foundations, or would that be too inconvenient?

Sure, you can ask, and I’ll tell you right away. It is here:

https://indicators.sciphil.org…

$27 billion a year last year, a lot less than a quarter of the tax breaks, and that’s mostly spent on vanity projects of the “make me live forever” kind, and most of that isn’t donated on the research actual merits, but on the whims and misconceptions of the donor. Therefore the impact to actual science isn’t even remotely comparable.

They exist.

By Gravis Zero • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread

Chip-scale atomic clocks are a thing. The problem is that they aren’t exactly low enough power to be wrist mounted as they need 115 mW constantly. You absolute can make it into a wristwatch (and people have) but it will need regular charging… unless you are using betavoltaic nuclear batteries. However to reach the power output needed with what is on the market, you would need about 120K of them.

The natural reaction to this is “what’s the purpose of building up that kind of arm strength if the batteries are just going to die in 50 years?” and the answer is the diamond battery! This is a newer betavoltaic battery which is in the same power output range but lasts for thousands of years because it’s based on Carbon-14.

Start doing those reps today because the watch of your dreams is 2400Kg.

AI Surveillance Startup Flock To Cut Several Hundred Jobs Amid Backlash, Sources Say

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Reuters reports:
Flock plans to let go of about 18% of its employees, people with direct knowledge of the plans said on Thursday, as the maker of AI-powered surveillance cameras and license-plate readers faces mounting opposition to its products from communities and lawmakers....

The company has about 1,500 employees [with job cuts hitting 270 employees]. Flock faces growing scrutiny from regulators, lawmakers, and privacy advocates, despite drawing strong investor interest among venture capitalists. A recent Reuters/Ipsos poll showed Americans are divided on whether Flock cameras are a good idea. Some 38% of the country supports the use of Flock cameras in their community, compared to 47% who oppose their use.
A related story… In Texas this week a county commissioner decommissioned all 61 of their Flock surveillance cameras and license plate readers, according to a local news report. County residents “have raised serious questions about who can access this data, what vendors can disclose, improper searches, and records being kept after data expires,” the precinct’s Chief Public Affairs Officer said.

As Mr. Miyagi might say,

By jenningsthecat • • Score: 3 • Thread

“Flock on, Flock off”

I really do hope that they Flock off, but cockroaches are perennial survivors so I’m not terribly optimistic.

Cloudflare Keeps 1.1.1.1 Out of Piracy Blocking, Escapes Penalties In France

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from TorrentFreak:
Cloudflare doesn’t block pirate sports streaming sites through its 1.1.1.1 DNS resolver in France, only through its CDN. The Paris Judicial Court has now accepted that stance, rejecting [French pay-TV provider] Canal+‘s request for penalties of 50,000 euros per site, per day. Interestingly, the court’s conclusion relies on statistics provided by Canal+ itself. […] As a result, Cloudflare will not be penalized under these orders, even though its public DNS resolver is not blocking the sites in question. That is in line with the company’s long-standing claim that it doesn’t interfere with its DNS.

In its recent transparency reports, Cloudflare repeatedly stated that it hasn’t blocked any content through 1.1.1.1, despite orders from French and Italian courts. “To date, Cloudflare has not blocked content through the 1.1.1.1 Public DNS Resolver,” the company’s latest report reads. […] Blocking through the CDN is another matter. According to the same report, Cloudflare geoblocked 1,238 domains in France in the second half of 2025, all under a single court order. In the first half of the year, it geoblocked 662 domains under seven orders. Cloudflare recently explained its position to the European Commission, in a submission (PDF) to its Counterfeit and Piracy Watch List consultation, stressing that global public DNS resolvers should not be used to block or restrict access.

Instead, it highlights its real-time pirate stream blocking program, which allows vetted rightsholders to flag pirate streams that run through its network. These streams are disrupted “within seconds,” Cloudflare says, without any DNS or IP address blocking. “For live content, where speed is crucial, Cloudflare has built real-time mitigation mechanisms that allow vetted rightsholder partners to flag infringing streams. When those streams are running through our network, we act on them in seconds,” Cloudflare informed the Commission. For now, Cloudflare can continue to block pirate sites through its CDN only, while its 1.1.1.1 DNS resolver remains untouched. Canal+ can still appeal the rulings, so it may not be the last we hear of it.

Good!

By SlashbotAgent • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

Good on Cloudflare for not manipulating DNS records.

Good on the Paris court for not being a bunch of ding dongs.

Boo to Canal+ for being a bunch of ding dongs.

Does it seem odd to anyone else that piracy sites would use Cloudflare as a CDN?

Re:1.1.1.2

By zlives • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

where is the hostfiles guy…

Re:DNS is a tyrant’s paradise

By Frobnicator • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

Don’t appeal, just maliciously comply: “Okay, we’ve blocked all of France. Welcome back to the dark ages.”

Yes, and I think Cloudflare was likely on that point. At least, I would have been.

They are right to take the approach they are doing. First stop is education and challenging the orders. Educate the politicians and the courts on both the technology and the reasons behind the way the technology operates. Fight it in the courts because that’s the right thing to do, even if bad actors want the harm and also technically illiterate folks don’t understand the harm, the moral grounds need the fight to be fought.

ONLY after that fails, absolute simple, blind, malicious compliance. If France refuses to listen to the technologists and wants the ban, that’s fine, roughly 25% of the global websites will be blackholed in France, and sites that rely on those will also shut down. Any and all requests get met by a redirect to the French court order. When the politicians and the courts demand the impossible and want to nuke themselves to the online dark ages despite people telling them they’re making a mistake, so be it.

Re:Good!

By Murdoch5 • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
Yep, good on Cloudflare, DNS is not the right or appropriate protocol to use for blocking access to sites. They’re in my opinion, handling this correctly, using a CDN. Hopefully, if this is appealed they don’t screw it up.

Re:1.1.1.2

By ksw_92 • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

He’s waiting for his hosts file to load into vi so he can edit it…

A 1960 Paper Published In Science Predicts World Will End Next Month

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
sciencehabit shares a report from Science Magazine:
A physicist has put a definite date on Doomsday,” The New York Times wrote on November 4, 1960. “He calculates that it will come on Friday the Thirteenth in November, 2026 A. D. On that date, or thereabouts, the human population will have expanded so far as to approach infinity and thus will automatically annihilate itself.” The newspaper was right — but the prediction was wrong. That week, Austrian American physicist Heinz von Foerster and two colleagues published a paper in Science with the stunningly succinct title "Doomsday: Friday, 13 November, A.D. 2026.”

The work was based on a simple observation: The time it took for the human population to double in size kept getting shorter. Using population estimates from about 400 B.C.E. until 1958 C.E., the authors — all from the department of electrical engineering at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign — came up with an equation that best described the trend. If things continued the way they were going, the number of humans on Earth would rise faster and faster, reaching more than 25 billion by 2020. The researchers didn’t calculate when humanity would run out of food, land, or energy. They just concluded that at some point this year, the equation ceased to give meaningful results because the predicted population shot toward infinity. That was their doomsday. “Our great-great-grandchildren will not starve,” they wrote. “They will be squeezed to death.”

The exact date was somewhat arbitrary, however. The formula solved to 2026.87 plus or minus 5.5 years, and The New York Times reported that von Foerster “searched the center of this doom-time span for an appropriate date and found that a Friday the Thirteenth would fall conveniently in November of 2026.” (November 13 also happened to be his birthday.) […] [D]emographers, annoyed by what they saw as a provocation by outsiders, pointed out obvious flaws. For example, the time it takes for the number of humans to double could get a lot shorter, but certainly not shorter than the 9 months it takes for a baby to develop. “In view of the comments that subsequently were published in this journal, an extensive discussion of this article does not seem to be required,” public health expert Harold Dorn drily noted in Science 2 years after von Foerster’s article was published. The forecast would set a record, he predicted, “for the short length of time required to demonstrate its unreliability.”
“The failure of the Doomsday equation is ultimately a cautionary tale about the dangers of extrapolating from historically exceptional circumstances,” writes economist Javier Birchenall of the University of California, Santa Barbara writes in a Perspective published in Science today.

Re: Day after midterms

By ArchieBunker • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

People voted for a guy to run the country like a business. Well this is how he runs his businesses. He gets rich while everyone else gets fucked.

Re:Not a real physicist then.

By Geoffrey.landis • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

The basic rule you learn in your first real physics course is that in real life there are no exponential solutions.

I think the original article was somewhat tongue in cheek.

Re:Not a real physicist then.

By PPH • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

First, assume a spherical cow in a vacuum.

Re: Day after midterms

By drinkypoo • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

Who is “we”? It’s long been known that he’s corrupt.

Re:Not a real physicist then.

By mistergrumpy • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
I’d mod you up if I could. Just about every commenter here deserves a giant WHOOOSH stamped on their forehead.

Apollo Software Pioneer Margaret Hamilton Dies at 90

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
"Margaret Hamilton, the groundbreaking researcher who helped create the field of software engineering and whose code helped land NASA’s Apollo astronauts on the moon to win the 20th century space race, has died,” writes longtime Slashdot reader Veeru. “She was 90.” MIT News reports:
A computing pioneer who authored over 130 publications, Hamilton helped to establish software engineering as a dedicated discipline. She worked at MIT from 1959 until the mid-1970s, after which she became a successful computing entrepreneur and CEO. Her life’s work was recognized with many awards and honors, including the 2016 Presidential Medal of Freedom from President Barack Obama, whose citation noted: “Hamilton defined new forms of software engineering and helped launch an industry that would forever change human history. Her software architecture led to giant leaps for humankind, writing the code that helped America set foot on the moon.”
“To say Margaret Hamilton was a pioneer — to say she was ahead of her time — would be a dramatic understatement. She was a software engineer at a time when that field was in its infancy, and she not only developed advanced code herself but also led a team in using that nascent technology to develop one of the most complex systems humanity had ever achieved,” says Olivier de Weck, the Apollo Program Professor and interim head of the MIT Department Aeronautics and Astronautics.
“The Apollo program still stands as one of our greatest testaments to the power of collaboration, ingenuity, and engineering, and Margaret Hamilton was a fundamental contributor to that program’s success. And for her that was just the beginning! She went on to become an entrepreneur and remained on the cutting edge of systems software throughout an extraordinary career, while acting as an advocate, mentor, and inspiration to millions.”

Re:Erm

By Arnonyrnous Covvard • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

She’s not gonna wake up and walk away. Telsa and OpenAl could be gone tomorrow.

A fantastic engineer

By AmiMoJo • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

Not only did she develop software without the aid of modern debugging tools, on a new architecture that was limited in ways that most modern embedded developers can’t even imagine, she pioneered a lot of the software safety techniques we still use.

Re: Erm

By commodore73 • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread
Clickrage bait for nerds?

Re:Erm

By drinkypoo • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

Telsa and OpenAl could be gone tomorrow.

Stop, I can only get so erect.

That’s engineering

By CustomBuild • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

The story about her daughter crashing the simulator says a lot about how she worked. Hamilton wanted a safeguard against starting a prelaunch program during flight; she was told the astronauts were too well trained to make that mistake. Then Lovell did it on Apollo 8, and her team had to help recover. Anyone who’s been told “the user won’t do that” should recognize that argument. She took the possibility of failure seriously, and the priority handling in her team’s Apollo 11 software meant an overloaded computer could keep doing the work needed for the landing. Imagine watching that happen during the actual descent, knowing the recovery mechanisms your team built were being put to the test. I’m glad she lived long enough to receive so much recognition for that work. Rest in peace.

US Bars Microsoft, Adobe, and Major IT Firms From Green Card Program

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from TechCrunch:
The Trump administration is suspending Microsoft, Adobe, and several other technology companies from a program that helps skilled foreign workers obtain permanent residency in the United States, accusing the companies of fraud. “Our message to Microsoft is: You’re a great American company, but you’ve got to hire great American workers,” U.S. Vice President JD Vance said in a news conference on Thursday, Reuters reported.

The other firms being suspended from the program include Capgemini, Cognizant, HCL, Infosys, Tata, and Wipro. Secretary of Labor Keith Sonderling said the government would not accept any new or pending permanent labor certification applications involving these companies. H-1B visas are designed for highly skilled positions that employers may struggle to fill with qualified U.S. workers. Tech companies are among the largest users of the program, with nearly three-quarters of approved visas going to workers from India, according to The Associated Press.

Vance also said during the news conference that the administration would investigate nine universities, including Harvard, Yale, and Stanford, over allegations they’re abusing a program that allows international students to come to the U.S. and were using the program to undermine wages for American workers.
“We believe in the strength and talent of the American workforce,” a Microsoft spokesperson said in a statement. “That is why the vast majority of Microsoft employees in the United States are Americans. We look forward to providing the Administration with additional information. For example, of the approximately 6,000 H-1B visa applications we submitted in the last fiscal year, 80% percent were to extend or change the status of existing Microsoft employees.”
“These were not to hire new people. The remaining filings for new employees were for individuals already legally in the United States who decided to come work for us, and they equal only 1% of our U.S. workforce. They are not new arrivals to our country.”

Re: Excellent Move

By Bahbus • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Because the whole process is stupid. If the company really wants to keep/hire a specific person, they shouldn’t have to jump through hoops to do so. But if the only way to keep that person legally hired is to abuse a stupid system already in place, then so be it.

Re: Uncalled for

By Midnight_Falcon • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
I agree. I am a “lib” and don’t agree with much the Trump administration does. H1B has been abused for decades. Tech companies use it to hire workers at low rates and then abuse them as they become “indentured servants,” afraid of getting fired in which case they have to beg for new employment and sponsorship to stay in the country. The system has been gamed for years. Want to hire an H1B and get a lawyer? The lawyer will tell you two things: Make a job ad which basically asks for the exact resume of your H1B candidate. Exact versions of VMWare, Python, etc you name it…be precise. Then post it in a print newspaper, not online on any job boards or a place a normal person would look. Voila! No American applicants. If you do interview Americans, all you have to do is say “candidate did not have required skills” with no real justification. No one checks. I once consulted at a bank and they literally had an entire floor of Indians on H1B with one white person in the corner office supervising them. I had plenty of friends that would have been qualified to work those jobs. The H1B system has been terrible for some time and needs dismantling. That said, all this will do is cause these companies to hire people in other countries to stay there and work remotely, for even less money than H1B. There also needs to be restrictions on outsourcing labor that can be done in America by Americans.

Re: Excellent Move

By Tony Isaac • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

I’m not sure I’d call it “fraud” per se. Companies usually comply with the letter of the law, just not the spirit.

Re:Except they don’t + H1Bs make local jobs valuab

By bmajik • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

>OK, you don’t work in software. Good tech companies don’t outsource core development. They hire in house.

I was a software engineer at Microsoft for 22 years.

For all 22 of those years, Microsoft had core developers on every product who were not Microsoft employees.

You may want to look up the “permatemps” lawsuit from the early 00s. Microsoft had so many permanant contractor “non employees” that they were succesfully sued for the practice.

Microsoft has all kinds of legal sub-structures and “at a distance” legal entities for various employment arbitrage reasons. The technical talent of the people is not a determining factor in whether someone is a contractor, vendor, or full time employee.... Or if they are employed at an overseas subsidiary or domestically here in the USA.

And Microsoft plays a LOT of games with hiring/employment laws.

For instance, Microsoft had (has?) a large Vancouver development shop because, as I understand it:
1) its faster to get Chinese/Indian nationals into Canada than it is to get them into the USA
2) Vancouver is just up the road from Redmond, so easy to come down to Redmond for in-person meetings once in a while
3) It’s very fast, legally to get people from Canada to the USA

So It was an open secret that MS would hire foreigners into the Vancouver office and park them there for, IIRC, 1 year, before moving them into the US.

Re:Excellent Move

By bmajik • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

I was a dev lead at Microsoft. I believe I was asked to support immigration fraud.

I had an employee on a VISA. He was in a junior level role.

The immigration attorney asked me to verify that the job requirements for his job were:

- masters degree
- expertise in python
- (a few other things)

He had a masters degree. He had the other things on the list.

Problem was, the job he actually had was an entry level dev job. It was the exact job I got hired in at at the beginning of my career. For the level/job he was at, a 4 year degree is normal. Python (or any other specific language) is not needed.

So i said “no, that’s not right. You don’t need this, or this, or that”

And the immigration attorney was like “OH! My mistake! It sounds like this is more of an entry level position! Well, I guess based on what you’ve told me, we cannot sponsor the Greencard process for this employee at this time”

I had no idea that’s what was going on or what was at stake when I answered the question. My employee wasnt mad at me - he quit MS and transferred to Google - who promised to push through his Greencard process. He said once he got done at Google he looked forward to working for me again at Microsoft some day.

So you tell me what you think was going on.

I think I was supposed to rubberstamp Microsoft immigration fraud, and I accidentally didn’t, because I tried to accurately answer the question I was actually asked.

But look at how the lawyer responded. “Oh, shoot, what a silly mistake - nevermind!”.

So no matter how I responded, he has plausible deniability. And if I had said, “yes, these are the required skills”, nobody would have known otherwise.

I was gutted that I had ruined things for my employee without realizing it. The fact that he wasn’t furious with me surprised me. To him, it was all a transaction. He wanted a Greencard; so he was going to go where he could get it - no hard feelings.

It’s all transactional.

Emmy Awards Leave Broadcast TV For Prime Video

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Amazon Prime Video will become the exclusive global home of the Emmy Awards under a six-year deal beginning in 2027, the Television Academy announced on Tuesday. The Emmys will stream live for free to viewers in more than 240 countries and territories without requiring a Prime subscription. From the report:
In the release, Prime Video was named as the “permanent home” for the Emmys, in contrast to the rotating agreement in place years prior. The switch ends the traditional “wheel-deal” setup to broadcast the awards, where ABC, CBS, NBC and Fox took turns hosting the Emmys each year. The system has been in place since at least 1994, with the most recent eight-year contract expiring this year.
“Television has never been more global, and the Emmys should be a celebration that the world can share,” Television Academy chair Cris Abrego said in a statement. “Having a dedicated home with Prime Video allows us to build on that legacy with unprecedented global reach and a broader commitment to the Television Academy and our mission throughout the year.”

Oh noes....

By dskoll • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

Oh noes.... I never watched the Emmy Awards on TV, and now I can’t watch it because I don’t have an Amazon account. Whatever shall I do???

To the non-cutters…

By reanjr • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

The Emmy’s have abandoned broadcast television. Why haven’t you?

Re:To the non-cutters…

By Fly Swatter • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
The NHL and MLB abandoned broadcast TV, so I abandoned them. Same with Nascar. The only thing left that I watch live over an antenna is the NFL - when they abandon me in a few years, the antenna will be useless and NFL will be dead to me as well.

Time marches on, things change, but advertising continues to ruin the experience for everything; dropping broadcast TV won’t change that.

Re: Oh noes....

By ArmoredDragon • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

If it’s anything like the Oscars, the whole thing is determined by whoever pays the highest bribe to promote their crap. I don’t get why people get excited over the world’s longest, most boring advertisement.

And, as always…

By MachineShedFred • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

As always, nothing of value was lost.

Unless you are in the television business, or 60+ years old, who the hell is watching these televised self-congratulatory industry-wide group masturbation events anyway?

Female AI Agents ‘Paid’ Less Than Males, Study Finds

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Ancient Slashdot reader williamyf writes:
If you thought the gender pay gap was not real, and that there were no biases in the workplace, think again: A recent study from the University of Limerick found that, in a VR office setting, AI agents — not even humanoid robots — that presented themselves as “male” were paid more per task and perceived as more “human-like” than their “female” counterparts, even though both were using the same underlying technology (LLM model, agent, guardrail, and harness). The pay gap was approximately 10%. The study was conducted with 189 people. Small sample, but still, food for thought.

Sounds reasonable

By smooth wombat • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

After all, women go for more decidely female-related professions such as female doctor, female surgeon, female attorney, or female director.

Of course the AI versions would get paid less.

Re:you cant be serious.

By beelsebob • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Not quite, no. The study has put out a paper that spells out what they did, that’s their “proof of bona fides” as you put it. Now if you want to tear it down, you need to make a reasoned and rational argument about something in that paper, not just shout on the internet.

Re:Probably due to methodical errors

By phantomfive • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread
Did you see the pictures of the AIs in the study?

What’s with that lighting? They didn’t adjust for the fact that the woman looks slightly more like a serial killer, with a wrinkled skirt pulled up to her ribcage. I haven’t seen graphics that bad since Metaverse. The study noticed it, but didn’t adjust for it. Relevant quote:

“Johanna was perceived as less human-like than Johan”

Because the graphics were terrible.

Re: Who is paying AI?

By drinkypoo • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

And then what, she withholds hex?

I read methods… this is why.

By sinij • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

Johan and Johanna To ensure high visual fidelity and anatomical realism, appearances were based on standard human models from Reallusion. These models were chosen for their neutral and highly similar appearances, aiming to isolate gender presentation as the primary visual difference between the two assistant representations.

In Figure 3 you can see the resulting bots. Dude looks almost normal, but female-presenting assistant is seriously into uncanny valley. This alone fully explains the observed result.

Chrome 155 Ships Decoding Support For JPEG XL

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Google has released Chrome 155 with support for decoding JPEG XL images, a format that offers 30-50% better compression than JPEG along with lossless compression, JPEG transcoding, HDR, animation, and progressive decoding. From a blog post:
We expect that JPEG XL is most helpful for high-fidelity or lossless compression, especially of photographic images or in cases in which fine-grained progressive decoding is preferred. In this post, we share why we brought JPEG XL to Chrome, how we used Rust to ensure memory safety first, the extensive performance work that makes it fast, and what the journey tells us about developer feedback and the web standards ecosystem.

[…] With JPEG XL officially landing in Chrome, the web becomes faster, richer, and safer. We encourage developers, content creators, and platform owners to start using .jxl images and animations in their pipelines. Try it out, file bugs, and help us continue building a faster and safer web for everyone.

Re:Too bad…

By drinkypoo • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

You also don’t want to see security updates? It’s simply not safe to use an old browser.

Re:Safer?

By Rei • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

Look, I use HEIC, but JPEG-XL is just better.

* Royalty-free
* Lossless transcoding of legacy JPEGs to immediately reduce their sizes by ~20% (fast enough that you can have webservers do it in realtime)
* Better fine detail / high frequency data representation for the same bitrate. HEIC was designed for video and simply is not as good at stills.
* Faster decoding
* MUCH faster compression
* True progressive decoding - and not old-school blocky progressive decoding, but using a smart algorithm that restores coarse detail (particularly focusing on parts of the image that the eyes immediately focus on) first, then progressively adding in finer detail that the eyes take more time to notice later.
* Vastly better lossless compression
* Better colour depth and native HDR (up to 32 bit per channel)
* Up to 1B x 1B pixel images (again, useful for scientific and engineering applications), with efficient loading (don’t have to load and decode the whole 1B x 1B image at full resolution to view it)
* Arbitrary colour spaces - you can even use it for scientific hyperspectral imaging. You can include e.g. alpha, depth maps, thermal data, selection masks, etc etc.

It’s just a better format for stills. It’s annoying that it’s taken this long to get support to take off (because it takes ages for most people to update their browsers), but I’m really glad that it’s starting to.

Re:Safer?

By thegarbz • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

No one said that. No one said it’s “safe”. They said it’s “safer”. Memory-safety makes the whole codebase safer than not having memory safety.

Now go look up what a “comparative adjective” is so you don’t say something stupid again in the future.

Re:Why did they remove it in the first place?

By thegarbz • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

Unused, and no use case for it, no pathway predicting it would become popular, and no reason to develop it further.
That changed when the PDF/A decided to adopt JPEGXL officially. Now PDF readers need to implement JPEGXL and both Chrome and Firefox include PDF readers in the browser. Their hand was forced.

Re:Safer?

By Rei • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

Slashdot doesn’t have table support, so it’s hard to do side-by-side well, but:

JPEG XL advantages:

Licensing:

JPEG XL: Fully royalty-free (Open source / Apache 2.0)
HEIC: Proprietary patent minefield (MPEG LA, Advance, Velos; royalties apply)

Legacy JPEG Migration:

JPEG XL: Lossless, reversible bitstream transcoding (~20% smaller); fast enough for real-time web servers
HEIC: Lossy re-encode only (generational quality loss; cannot reconstruct original JPEG)

Fine Detail & Textures

JPEG XL: Retains sharp text, fine lines, subtle textures, and film grain
HEIC: Video-derived coding (HEVC / X.265). Tends to smooth out high frequences and smudge grain.

Software Encoding Speed

JPEG XL: Extremely fast; highly parallelized SIMD architecture
HEIC: Exceptionally slow and computationally expensive in software

Software Decoding Speed

JPEG XL: Fast, lightweight multi-threaded CPU decoding
HEIC: Heavy CPU overhead (without using hardware acceleration)

Progressive Rendering:

JPEG XL: True progressive decode; smart saliency algorithm to focus bandwidth on critical details first.
HEIC: None; full file must be received and decoded before display

Lossless Compression
JPEG XL: Dedicated modular mode; vastly outperforms PNG and WebP
HEIC: Ill-suited; you basically have to try to do lossless compression with an inherently-lossy format

Bit Depth & HDR

JPEG XL: Native HDR; up to 32-bit floating point per channel
HEIC: Typically capped at 10-bit or 12-bit integer

Max Dimensions & Scaling

JPEG XL: Up to 1B x 1B; efficient viewport/crop loading without full decoding
HEIC: v5.2, 4096x2160; v6.2: 8192x4320; a tiling hack allows up to 16384 x 16384

Channels & Color Spaces:

JPEG XL: Arbitrary color spaces (hyperspectral); unlimited extra channels (alpha, depth, thermal, masks, CMYK, etc)
HEIC: Rigid container; limited auxiliary channels and standard video color spaces

HEIC advantages:

Rollout / acceleration:

JPEG XL: no dedicated hardware acceleration (thankfully, it’s not as important because it’s so much more efficient). Software adoption still rolling out.
HEIC: Hardware silicon (ASICs). Default capture format on modern iOS/Android; native capture in Sony, Canon, and Nikon cameras

Video:

JPEG XL: Supports animations (GIF/APNG replacement), with some optimizations** (it’s not just a series of stills), but lacks the full set of optimizations that a proper video codec has.
HEIC: Container naively pairs full HEVC video tracks and audio with video.

** - JPEG XL can store up to 4 reference frames in a buffer, with multiple blending modes from the references (add, replace, multiply, etc); has subframe bounding boxes (“dirty rectangles”) for when only part of a frame changes; invisible frames; modular deltas (differences between frames); etc. However, it lacks motion vectors (e.g. detecting a feature drifting across a scene and simply having to encode “move it” (followed by any needed deltas). So it’s great for “GIFs”, but if you wanted to encode a full movie, it’d be significantly larger than e.g. HEVC.

OpenAI Unleashes Hundreds More Math Results Upon a Field Already In Shock

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
OpenAI says an unreleased internal model has produced 372 results that either resolve or make substantial progress on open problems in mathematics and theoretical computer science. The company says almost all were generated by a single AI agent from a single prompt. “This would be a striking difference from OpenAI’s earlier blockbuster solution to the Navier-Stokes problem, which was produced through the collective efforts of a 10,000-strong agentic swarm that cost millions of dollars in computing power,” reports Scientific American. From the report:
OpenAI revealed the results in a GitHub repository at 6 P.M. EDT. The deluge will take mathematicians months to parse through and understand — including to determine whether the proofs contain novel and important ideas or are mostly mash-ups of existing techniques. But many of the results have already been verified in Lean — a programming language that validates a proof’s logic — and are therefore all but certain to be correct.

Among the results claimed are a solution to the four-dimensional Kakeya conjecture, improvements on some of the world’s most important computer algorithms and actual progress toward math’s scariest problem, the Riemann hypothesis.

Re: mostly mash-ups of existing techniques

By LindleyF • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread
I have proof. But it is too large to fit in this buffer.

A few comments on the problems

By JoshuaZ • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

Mathematician here specializing in number theory with a side-order of graph theory. I’ve only had time to start looking at two of them. First, is the Hadwiger-Nelson/chromatic number of the plane https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hadwiger%E2%80%93Nelson_problem proof. As far as I’m aware (and I could be wrong) the technique it uses here is not in the literature, so this is a genuine construction of a new technique. Second is the Erdos Egyptian fraction bound, and for that one it looks like the techniques are about what I’d expect, but I’m definitely still digesting both of these.

For the quasi-Riemann Hypothesis the striking thing is almost the opposite direction. It looks like the AI used standard complex analytic techniques to get the result. But many mathematicians have often thought for years that those techniques would not likely be strong enough to get this sort of result.

I know less about the Unique Games Conjecture https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unique_games_conjecture but having talked with some of the people there it looks like it took a somewhat standard set of ideas and then combined them with multiple just weird stuff and sort of took a hard left turn at one point for no clear reason and ended up at the result.

It is also worth noting that while many of these have Lean code confirming their correctness (quasi-RH for example) others do not. The three I mentioned above have all also been looked at at this point by human mathematicians who have not found issues; that’s likely true for others, but those three I’m aware at least of people doing so. Not all the claims have Lean code though; a bit under half. One of the non-formalized problems also has been withdrawn due to what essentially amounts to a sign error https://github.com/openai/math/blob/main/preprints/Algebraicity-of-Weil-classes-on-split-abelian-eightfolds-September-18-2026/paper.pdf. It is likely others will be withdrawn also by the end, but I’d be surprised if more than 10 are. And even if everything single one without Lean code turned out to be wrong (which seems very unlikely), this would still be an amazing set of math. I commented elsewhere that if a human mathematician had made the quasi-RH result they’d be likely a shoe-in for the Fields Medal, and another mathematician replied saying “delete likely.”

Now a more editorial comment: There are legitimate concerns about what this is doing to mathematics. This sort of thing is very cool. But it also is part of a trend that may make it much harder to train young mathematicians or get them to exist at all. If the AIs are limited in how genuinely novel their ideas can be, then we may end up in a situation where we get a massive burst in math over the next few years, and then math stalls out because we don’t have enough good really high caliber mathematicians (Not the mathematicians like me, but people like Serre, Tao, Scholze, Clausen,etc.) to come up with deeply new ideas that the AIs can build on.

Re:mostly mash-ups of existing techniques

By StormReaver • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

It doesn’t really matter if it makes a useful contribution to the field.

To which field? Math? Not even close. Data theft? absolutely.

If the mathematicians ever used ChatGPT to talk about math, then that is the source of the results. LLMs, by definition, cannot usefully contribute to anything that requires more than rearranging existing data. Rearranging existing data is their only function.

Re:A few comments on the problems

By BranMan • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

THIS is why we have Slashdot. Thanks for looking into this JoshuaZ! Let us know what you find out. We’ll stay tuned.

Re:mostly mash-ups of existing techniques

By JoshuaZ • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

If the mathematicians ever used ChatGPT to talk about math, then that is the source of the results. LLMs, by definition, cannot usefully contribute to anything that requires more than rearranging existing data. Rearranging existing data is their only function.

This is really not accurate. There’s Fields Medal level work here with quasi-RH for example. And for Hadwiger-Nelson it took an approach that doesn’t seem to be in in the literature. These things really are doing novel math. I’ve personally seen this is in a bunch of situations. Here’s a personal example, much smaller than anything like these problems. I have a recent preprint with a student here https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.36068 (about 90% of this was done by her. She’s very good.) But part of this came from when I ran a version of Proposition 13 in that paper through Claude just to clean up the draft of that bit before I sent it to her. Claude informed me (essentially unprompted) that the argument had a whole in it (in addition to pointing out grammar errors, unbalanced parentheses and some other embarrassing minor mistakes). I then fixed the hole, and gave it back to Claude. Claude thought for a few minutes, and then informed me that I had *not* fixed the hole, and the reason was that my version of the proposition was missing an entire infinite family which it constructed. The literature on this problem is small, and I’m very familiar with it. The family it produced is straightforward (see Prop 8), but definitely was not in the existing literature. So yes, these systems really can do novel math, and can even do so in an essentially minimally prompted fashion, in this case, explaining to the meat mathematician why his proof is wrong. My student and I then generalized Claude’s family to Theorem 9 in that paper, but the AI definitely had an impact.

At some level this was actually not a good thing. I’m trying to encourage students to *not* rely on the AI for research so they develop basic research skills. So if the AI had not volunteered the family I wouldn’t have had to tell her that the AI had discovered it, but honestly required noting it. So I had a conflict between intellectual honesty and being a good role model.

Campus Censorship Wars, 25 Years After a Slashdot Q&A

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Slashdot reader carlk22 writes:
In February 2001, Slashdot readers asked Carl Kadie about censorship and privacy at colleges, and he answered. Now Kadie, who founded the Computers and Academic Freedom project at EFF in 1991, has written its history. In Part 1, Ohio State kicks a student off its network, then out of school, after a prank routes his “fuck you” into rec.aquaria, and a supercomputing center fires a student over an email from saddam@iraq.bunker.gov. In Part 2, Nebraska bans the project’s own newsletter, the FBI asks a conference attendee to show them his leg, and Playboy calls. The original archive is on GitHub.

Re: State is probably best stated by the comics

By maladroit • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

This racist is a Republican, and the likely winner of a statewide office in Texas:
https://www.texastribune.org/2…

He has been endorsed by multiple Republicans, including the Texas governor.
https://www.texastribune.org/2…

Re:State is probably best stated by the comics

By drinkypoo • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread

Hamas has repeatedly declared its intent to exterminate all the Jews. That’s genocide.

Netanyahu is currently doing what every expert says is a genocide in Gaza. Hamas was founded in response to a massacre in a mosque done by a Jewish “settler” assault-colonialist.

Hamas, who just a couple of years ago, attacked Israel to rape and slaughter thousands of people. After decades of the same.

What is the death toll on each side?
Why are Jews protesting for the right to rape Palestinian hostages?

Re:State is probably best stated by the comics

By jacks smirking reven • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

None of that happens in a vacuum though, the reason DACA was done via EO was that Republicans refused to pass the DREAM Act which was a bi-partisan bill kicked around since 2001 but Republicans would filibuster it at every oppurtunity.

- Same with the McCain Kennedy bill, bipartisan legislation never got a vote in the Senate
- Same with another bill in 2007, never made it out of the Senate
- Same with the Gang of 8 Bill which did et over 60 votes in the Senate, bipartisan! Then John Boehner , Republican Speaker, let it die on the vine, never got a vote.
- Then we have the Lankford bill, a bipartisan yet very conservative bill that Biden signaled he would sign. Was going to be actual law until Trump told Republicans he needed the issue to campaign on (Ted Cruz admitted to this explicitly) so they let it die.

So at every opportunity to pass actual immigration reform, something we have needed for like 50+ years, the last major legislation being from the Reagan era (where he granted amnesty!) Republicans stand in the way, almost like they don’t really care about the issue, I mean, if immigration is this huge crisis why no legislation? Someone answer that question.

What is missing from the entire conversation right now is Trump is governing pretty much EXACTLY like Bush, Obama, AND Biden did.

Absolutely fucking not, the lawlessness, the destruction of norms, the bending of the alw, the craven grifting, the brutally divisive rhetoric, it’s incredibly different and any equivocation is really just copium or ignorance, usually the former, it’s a self soothing permission structure, “we can be fucking unhinged because i feel personally slighted”

Even the bitter clingers thing is just nonsense, even the smallest bit of context destroys that whole talking point, there’s a reason it’s always brought up and never quoted

But the truth is, is that, our challenge is to get people persuaded that we can make progress when there’s not evidence of that in their daily lives. You go into some of these small towns in Pennsylvania, and like a lot of small towns in the Midwest, the jobs have been gone now for 25 years and nothing’s replaced them. And they fell through the Clinton administration, and the Bush administration, and each successive administration has said that somehow these communities are gonna regenerate and they have not. So it’s not surprising then that they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.

Um, now these are in some communities, you know. I think what you’ll find is, is that people of every background — there are gonna be a mix of people, you can go in the toughest neighborhoods, you know working-class lunch-pail folks, you’ll find Obama enthusiasts. And you can go into places where you think I’d be very strong and people will just be skeptical. The important thing is that you show up and you’re doing what you’re doing.

What exactly is so offensive about that statement? Who are the snowflakes here?

Re: State is probably best stated by the comics

By drinkypoo • • Score: 4, Informative • Thread

This is stupid racist dickhead bullshit because ICE has detained at least 500 citizens so far, and every person who was “deported” to a country they didn’t come from was trafficked by ICE. Fuck your support for racism in pursuit of your support of a child rapist traitor. It also makes you a traitor.

Re:State is probably best stated by the comics

By bmajik • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Control of other people’s speech is always about asserting power.

It’s never actually about “reducing harm”; it’s about asserting power.

Talking about it in “harm” terms is a clever hack: … because most humans are sensitive to harm/harm reduction along their moral reasoning (see: Jonathan Haidt)

But “Never hurt my feelings” is an impossible bar, and it doesn’t scale across a civilization. It cannot be a basis for law.

The attempt to abuse the “harm receptors” of political enemies is contributing to the mutual dehumanization across faction lines.

Google, Unity Launch Platform To Create Video Games From Prompts

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Bloomberg:
Alphabet’s Google and gaming tools developer Unity Software announced a new platform that will allow people to create video games from simple text prompts, marking the latest incursion of generative artificial intelligence into artistic and creative industries. The initiative, called Playground, will “put game creation in the hands of millions of new creators, and bring new experiences to billions of players worldwide,” the companies said in a statement on Oct 7.

With its debut, Playground will let people 18 and older generate and customize games using natural language prompts, “no coding required.” Later in 2026, a new expanded creation experience called Unity Spark, will be integrated with Playground, providing “robust, professional-level” mechanics and high-fidelity 3D capabilities. Creators will be able to build “immersive, superlative experiences” with a simple text prompt, according to the release. Playground builds on Google’s push into world models, a type of AI that generates virtual environments in real time from text prompts, rather than just video.
Google and Unity’s partnership “could reduce fears that AI will make Unity’s core game-building software less necessary, while posing limited medium-term risk to Roblox’s advantage as a social gaming platform,” says Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Nathan Naidu.
The introduction of Unity Spark later in 2026 “could broaden Unity’s creator base and support its game-development business,” which represent about a third of sales.

Oh good.

By MachineShedFred • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Because we don’t have enough AI slop clogging everything up already.

I hope they realize people hate slop

By Kisai • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

I hope Unity and Google eventually realize people hate AI slop, and doing all these slop-enabling AI things is just going to erode the trust in the actual market.

Right now this is pushing people to support indie games that proudly say they don’t use generative AI assets. Unity has picked losers before, and I expect Unity and Unreal to eventually have to dial back some of their investments in generative AI slop because it risks people abandoning the platform.

And no, Roblox is not a serious gaming platform. All Roblox is, is a bunch of stolen game concepts made into a common ugly avatar platform.

Re: More public domain games

By taustin • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

It hasn’t been to SCOTUS yet, but the current position of the Library of Congress (whose decision it is, so far) is that stuff created by AI is not, in fact, copyrightable. There’s case law on it.

That is how it works. So far.

Re:I hope they realize people hate slop

By rsilvergun • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
I don’t think this is about creating useful or profitable content this is more about training their AIs and showing them off to investors.

Remember the problem AI is designed to solve is wages. Paying wages.

That said we all laughed at horse armor and they just kept cramming it down people’s throats until kids grew up who were used to that crap. And yeah you might not be someone who would buy horse armor but it does fuck up the industry and the quality of your hobby is substantially lower as a result.

It probably will be the same with AI slop. You and I will hate it because we grew up in a world without it but to kids who just get that stuff blasted into their eyeballs it’ll be normal and they won’t have any defenses against it. It will take over the industry through the kids and we will lose access to the stuff we want.

Re:Oh good.

By backslashdot • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

That started in the late ’80s and ’90s, when Microsoft discovered you could ship software the way a raccoon ships garbage: everywhere, immediately, full of bugs, and with zero intention of coming back for it. Shame was deprecated. Embarrassment got a service pack and was never seen again.
Then the frameworks showed up. Visual Basic. PowerBuilder. Tools designed so that if your IQ matched room temperature, you could still drag a button onto a form and ruin someone’s afternoon. Coding was no longer a profession. It was a hobby you could pick up between meetings and a mild head injury.
The real extinction event was Java, especially its GUI framework. Swing didn’t just lower the bar. It buried the bar, held a funeral, and invited the criminally unwell and the sadistic business analyst to give the eulogy. Suddenly anyone with a corporate login and a grudge could produce “software” (term used the way “artisan” is used on a gas-station sandwich) that your overlord would then force the entire building to click until their souls filed a ticket.

Microsoft and Nvidia Unveil Surface Laptop Ultra For $2,599

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
At a press event today, Microsoft unveiled the new Surface Laptop Ultra featuring an NVIDIA RTX Spark platform with a Blackwell-based GPU capable of up to one petaflop of AI compute. The laptop supports up to 128GB of unified memory for running models as large as 120 billion parameters locally, while also adding a 15-inch mini-LED display, expanded ports, upgraded cooling, and support for hundreds of AAA games. It’s available for pre-order today starting at $2,599. Neowin reports:
To keep the device’s temperature under control, Microsoft has also developed a new cooling system that offers up to 2.5 times the thermal capacity of the 15-inch Surface Laptop 7th Edition. The Surface Laptop Ultra comes with a 15-inch PixelSense Ultra mini-LED touchscreen with a 3:2 aspect ratio, a pixel density of 262 PPI, and peak HDR brightness of up to 2,000 nits.

Despite its beefy specs, the Surface Laptop Ultra measures less than 18mm thick and weighs under 4.5 pounds (around 2kg). The laptop will be available in Platinum and Nightfall finishes. Microsoft has also increased the size of the precision haptic touchpad by more than 30% compared to the Surface Laptop 7th Edition for improved haptic input. The Surface Laptop Ultra includes a broader selection of ports, featuring USB-C, USB-A, HDMI, a 3.5mm headphone jack, and a full-size SD card reader. It also features the world’s first built-in USB-C magnetic charging.

finally

By zlives • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

my windows update patching can happen in mere hours.

No mention of battery life

By diffract • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread
that’s like the most important feature of a portable computer

Re:Scant details in the article

By stabiesoft • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
Am well aware. I’m also well aware my newer thinner laptop throttles way sooner than my old one. The faster processor on it is literally not just useless, and performs worse than my old slower one because it throttles within a couple seconds. That one petaflop spec is going to last a tenths of a second I expect. I did see another article since my post from a different source and it was touting the cloud access the new machine gets and how a few tasks could be run locally. So I’d expect that this is just a terminal into the cloud in reality. Run the task in the cloud, it’ll be fast. Assuming you have a fast connection. Run it local and have dinner, a good nights sleep and it might be ready in the morning. Bonus, fry your eggs on it.

Fatal flaw

By Smonster • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread
It runs a modern Windows OS.

Re:“Magnetic charging’?

By Jason Earl • • Score: 4, Informative • Thread

Google says that patent expired in September of 2025, as it was filed in 2005. Yes, we are getting old.

Personally, I prefer the old rectangular Thinkpad charging connectors.

Xbox Secures Exclusive GTA 6 Streaming Rights

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Microsoft has reportedly secured exclusive cloud-streaming rights for Grand Theft Auto VI, meaning Xbox Cloud Gaming will be the only service able to stream the game at launch. “Rockstar Games still hasn’t announced a PC version of Grand Theft Auto VI, so this deal will allow Xbox to market its Xbox Cloud Gaming service to PC players who would otherwise need an Xbox Series X / S or PS5 console,” reports The Verge. From the report:
News of the streaming rights comes around a month after Microsoft announced some major changes to Xbox Cloud Gaming. From November, the same month Grand Theft Auto VI releases, Microsoft is limiting streaming hours to just 15 hours for Xbox Game Pass Ultimate subscribers, 10 hours for Premium subscribers, and just five hours for Game Pass Essential. Microsoft is also opening up access to Xbox Cloud Gaming with a pay-as-you-go option next month, rather than being limited to Game Pass subscriptions. The pay-as-you-go option is perfectly timed for Grand Theft Auto VI, allowing those who don’t own an Xbox, or who primarily play from a phone, to stream the game by paying for a bundle of hours.

This was denied

By HalAtWork • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

The IGN article debunking this

It wouldn’t make sense after Xbox heavily restricted Xbox Cloud Streaming to a limit of 15 hours per month for subscribers.

Re:This was denied

By fleeped • • Score: 4, Informative • Thread

It wouldn’t make sense after Xbox heavily restricted Xbox Cloud Streaming to a limit of 15 hours per month for subscribers.

15 hours is a day or two, max, for the starved GTA fans who think this is the second (well, 6th) coming. That limit is hilarious.

Re:Unless I can play it offline, I won’t buy it

By MikeDataLink • • Score: 4 • Thread

they decided to go “online only”, which immediately reduced my interest in this game to zero.

Your whole post is making up something that’s not true, and then bitching about it. You must be a politician.

Update from Xbox

By nimbusarch • • Score: 4, Informative • Thread
UPDATE: Xbox Chief Strategy Officer Matthew Ball has clarified via his personal social media that GTA 6 will not be streaming to PC upon its launch via the cloud, following a report today that Xbox will be the exclusive place to stream GTA 6 via the cloud at launch. “While the excitement for GTA VI and Xbox is great to see, it has also led to some misreporting,” Ball states. “We are looking forward to launching GTA VI on Xbox November 19, though the game will not be streaming exclusively or to PC.”

Re:Unless I can play it offline, I won’t buy it

By tlhIngan • • Score: 4 • Thread

because there is no disc to “authenticate your ownership” to the Xbox, so it will attempt to reach some remote server to look at your “account”.

You can play it offline. But only on one console. Xbox has the concept of “home console” or “primary console”. You can download a game to it and as long as the console checks in every so often (once a year or so) the license will be valid on it.

All other consoles you log into must be online to validate the license.

So it’s not truly offline play but you could play the campaign offline as it doesn’t need to do a license check on your primary console. Note that this only works to keep that console offline - you put it online and it’ll refresh the licenses you have so if it got transferred it’ll stop working. Or after a year, which ever happens first.

Francis Halzen Wins Nobel Physics Prize For Antarctic ‘Ghost Particle’ Hunt

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot
University of Wisconsin-Madison physicist Francis Halzen has been awarded the 2026 Nobel Prize in Physics for his contributions to understanding astrophysical neutrinos. Halzen led the development of the IceCube Neutrino Observatory beneath the Antarctic ice, which has helped trace high-energy neutrinos back to cosmic sources such as supermassive black holes and opened a new era of “multi-messenger” astronomy. Longtime Slashdot reader schwit1 shares a report from UW-Madison:
Embedded in a cubic kilometer of Antarctic ice, IceCube uses thousands of light sensors to survey the universe for neutrinos, nearly massless particles that rarely interact with other matter. Neutrinos provide information about the workings of black holes, galaxies and other objects in the cosmos. “IceCube is like no other telescope in the world,” says UW-Madison interim Chancellor Eric M. Wilcots. “And there is no other scientist quite like Francis Halzen, whose idea to create a neutrino detector under almost a mile of ice has led to a remarkable multinational and multi-institutional scientific collaboration and a fundamental shift in how we think about the universe.”

Unlike the neutral neutrino, cosmic rays are charged particles whose paths cannot be traced directly back to their sources. But the powerful cosmic accelerators that produce them, like supermassive black holes, will also produce neutrinos. These so-called “ghost particles” travel nearly undisturbed from their accelerators, giving scientists an almost direct pointer to their source. Along with observations by other telescopes, the neutrino first detected by IceCube provided the first-ever evidence of a source of high-energy cosmic rays, whose origins have been notoriously difficult to pinpoint since their discovery over 100 years ago by 1936 physics Nobel laureate Victor Hess.

Re:Fundamental physics has never been more dead

By AmiMoJo • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

Just because everyone was operating on the assumption that high energy cosmic neutrinos exist doesn’t mean that it isn’t worth proving that beyond all doubt. It wouldn’t be the first time if the results was unexpected, or if it turned out a whole load of accepted physics were based on a faulty assumption.

Re:Fundamental physics has never been more dead

By excelsior_gr • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
Yeah! Besides computers, telecommunications, medical equipment and energy production, what have particle physics done for us, heh?

Re:Fundamental physics has never been more dead

By Rei • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

“Okay, nuclear power. Yeah. Yeah, they did give us that. That’s true. "

“And industrial-scale superconducting magnets!”

“Don’t forget GPS satellite relativistic corrections!”

“And radioisotope therapy!”

“Electron beam therapy?”

“World Wide Web, wasn’t that created by particle physicists?”

“Yeah, they did do that.”

“Capacitative touchscreens too, you know.”

“All right, all right, FAIR ENOUGH! But APART from computers, telecommunications, nuclear power, PET scans, MRIs, satellite communications, superconductors, radioisotope therapy, electron beam therapy, heat-shrink tubing, cargo and baggage screening, smoke detectors, muon tomography, capacitative touchscreens, and the World Wide Web, WHAT HAS PARTICLE PHYSICS EVER DONE FOR US?!”

“Synchrotron light sources for drug discovery?”

“Oh, drug discovery?! GROW UP!”

Logging the universe

By CustomBuild • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

I love that the answer to “these particles almost never interact with anything” was basically “fine, we’ll instrument a cubic kilometer of Antarctica.” Imagine being the person who had to write that funding proposal. Then imagine actually making it work.

The interesting bit is being able to connect a particle arriving here with something that happened out there. Cosmic rays don’t arrive with a reliable return address. Neutrinos give you a much better pointer, and other telescopes help check the connection. That’s a pretty impressive payoff for watching ice in the dark.

Halzen deserves the recognition. I hope the engineers, drill crews, and people doing the calibration get some attention too. A clever detector design still needs thousands of sensors to behave as expected, somewhere you can’t exactly pop down to fix a loose cable. Getting useful science out of that is a hell of an achievement.

Re:Fundamental physics has never been more dead

By TrekkieGod • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

As Sabine Hossenfelder accurately observed in her latest video

Quoting Sabine Hossenfelder as anything just outs you as anti-science. She has pivoted years ago to making videos that stir the pot of controversy, aiming at those who don’t like “academics”. If you want any proof of that claim, you can check out her video saying that Physicists are afraid of Eric Weinstein. Eric Weinstein has a bulshit “geometric unity” theories thoroughly debunked, where it’s not even that he can’t get published: he doesn’t *want* to get published, claims in his copyright notice for that paper that it’s for “entertainment only” and requires his express permission to write any papers that build upon what he has written: so you technically can’t publish a paper debunking without violating his copyright, if anyone actually *cared* to, because physicists that have looked at it like Sean Carroll pointed out his paper isn’t rigorous enough to say anything testable.

She allies herself with quacks to get views, and you’re falling for her bs.