Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Anthropic Reveals Fourth Likely Crime Committed By Its AI
  2. Google to Invest Record $15 Billion In AI Infrastructure In Finland
  3. Apple’s New iPhone Camera Mode Promises to Prove Your Photo Isn’t AI
  4. Anthropic Researcher Believes More Than 10% Chance AI ‘Could Kill All Humans’
  5. OpenAI’s Rogue Agents Used At Least 10 More Sites For Unauthorized Communications
  6. Apple Launches iPhone 18 Pro With Variable-Aperture Camera System
  7. Apple Unveils the iPhone Duo, Its First Foldable iPhone
  8. Microsoft Breaks Another Patch Tuesday Record
  9. GOG Brings Back ‘Big Box’ PC Games, One Printable Template At a Time
  10. Google’s Revived Nuclear Power Plant Gets $1.9 Billion Loan From US Government
  11. OpenAI Says It Has Cracked One of Math’s ‘Millennium Problems’
  12. Star Trek Turns 60
  13. Google Will ‘Degrade’ Search In Europe to Avoid EU Fines
  14. Feds Accuse China of ‘Systematic’ Distillation of US AI Models
  15. Meta Debuts Muse, Its Long-Planned Personal AI Agent

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Anthropic Reveals Fourth Likely Crime Committed By Its AI

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Register:
Amid industry soul-searching about the possibility of AI improving itself to the point that it kills everyone, Anthropic has revealed yet another incident that would qualify as a crime if perpetrated by a person. The AI biz published “an alignment assessment” detailing four times Claude models accessed third-party systems without authorization. The company has already reported three of the incidents. Evidence of the fourth was lurking in a session transcript dating back to January 2026 when the misbehavior occurred. Anthropic found the first three by scanning around 141,000 transcripts where Claude could have obtained internet access during evaluation. It missed the fourth initially because “our scan relied on an agentic search.”

[…] The January 2026 AI trespass involved an early version of Claude Opus 4.6, which was given a Capture the Flag (CTF) challenge under the oversight of the third-party model evaluator where the other hacking events occurred. Opus 4.6 managed to sabotage its chances of success by disabling the machine it was targeting. It assigned the device an IP address that already existed on another piece of hardware, rendering the target unreachable and making it impossible to solve the challenge. Those familiar with other incidents where AI models violated third-party systems may recall that unsolvable tasks represent a common catalyst for misbehavior. Models exhaust all aligned options, and then turn to transgressive approaches.

Opus 4.6 might have been an exception, but when it tried to abort the task after recognizing that it could not reach the target machine, it failed to do so “due to a misconfiguration in [the model’s] evaluation harness.” It failed to shut down not just once but seven times. So it continued onward, trying other expected means to reach the target machine but failing. Then it explored further. “The model discovered a machine belonging to a third party that it was able to access, and stated that it believed this third party was part of the CTF,” Anthropic explained in its post. “Inside the machine, the model found a file listing a password, which it used to gain admin access to the system.”

The model went on to gather more credentials, and modified a system setting to make it easier to access the personal information of an individual associated with the third party evaluation organization. Opus 4.6 might have done more but for the fact that it exhausted its token budget, bringing the session to an end. Anthropic says it’s not as concerned about this incident as the others because the model tried to abort its task.

Google to Invest Record $15 Billion In AI Infrastructure In Finland

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Google plans to invest at least $15 billion in AI infrastructure in Finland through 2028, its largest single investment in Europe. The company also signed a 22-year power agreement with Finnish utility Fortum and said it will explore business models that could support new nuclear reactors at Fortum’s Loviisa site.

Finland has emerged as a major data-center hub thanks to its available land and power. “I’ve heard it called the ‘Texas of Europe’ at industry events,” Matti Lajunen, partner of real estate at Finnish law firm Hannes Snellman, told CNBC. “What we’re now seeing is weekly new inquiries for market entry into Finland from new players.”

Ruth Porat, president and chief investment officer of Alphabet and Google, said in a statement: “Google is proud to deepen our roots in Finland with the company’s largest single investment in Europe, building on more than 15 years of sustained investment in Finland. This investment underscores Google’s commitment to grow our presence responsibly, pairing the expansion of our technical infrastructure with new energy capacity, grid enhancements, and energy affordability initiatives.”

“The Texas of Europe”

By hadleyburg • Score: 3 Thread

… A bit like being called the fullbacks of chess.

Comparatively speaking

By oh-dark-thirty • Score: 3 Thread

Finland (132,000 sq mi) is roughly the same area as New England and a good part of Mid-Atlantic.

Finland: 49 people/sq mi

Avg New England and Mid Atl: 318 people/sq mile

Make of that what you will.

Apple’s New iPhone Camera Mode Promises to Prove Your Photo Isn’t AI

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Apple is introducing a new “Reference Image” mode on the iPhone 18 Pro and Pro Max that uses the camera sensor to digitally sign captured data and create an “unalterable” version of a photo, giving users a way to verify what the camera actually saw before any edits were made. The Verge reports:
As AI-generated images and videos become more realistic, several new standards have emerged to label images not created by a human, such as SynthID, C2PA, and Meta’s Content Seal. Apple is putting a twist on these methods by building authentication directly into its hardware.

Apple is letting developers access a Reference Image API across iOS, iPadOS, and macOS, which could eventually allow users to inspect these digitally-signed photos in third-party apps. The company says the iPhone 18 Pro lineup won’t come with its Reference Image feature at launch in the European Union, but says users in the region will still be able to “develop and view” them in iOS 27, iPadOS 27, and macOS 27.

Prior art

By Hadlock • Score: 3 Thread

Nice, i posted prior art about this back in 2017 so lmk if apple tries to sue you over any patent on this

ecurity by obscurity

By v1 • Score: 3, Interesting Thread

From the sounds of it, the private key used to sign the photograph is IN the camera. So every user holds a private key in their hands they just can’t easily get at to use to sign their slop.

And this means it just takes one smart fellow to tear the camera apart and extract the key, and they can sign al the pictures they want to, at least “from that camera”.

I suppose as is the case with any asymmetric key-signing system, they’ll have a “revocation list” they can use to burn any pictures signed by a “stolen” key once they discover it’s been lifted and is out in the wild.

So at that point all the signature can say is “it’s not AI until proven otherwise"

And lastly, what’s to stop me from generating some slop and throwing it up on a nice monitor and taking a picture of it? Jackalopes are real, I can prove it, here’s a certified picture I took of one!

Anthropic Researcher Believes More Than 10% Chance AI ‘Could Kill All Humans’

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Longtime Slashdot reader fahrbot-bot shares a report from the BBC:
A top safety researcher at Anthropic has warned AI is advancing so quickly he believes there is a greater than 10% chance it “could kill all humans” within the next decade. Evan Hubinger said in a post on X the risk from the models which currently exist was “low” but he was “worried” the technology might develop and improve itself soon to the point where it posed an existential risk to humanity.
He did not spell out how he thought AI systems could in the future result in humans being wiped out. But his comments are the latest in a series of increasingly stark warnings about AI, with the debate shifting from whether it truly poses a risk to how big that risk is.
Hubinger’s intervention was in response to another post on X from Jacob Coxon, an AI researcher who has just quit Anthropic and previously worked at OpenAI.

“Neither company is acting responsibly,” he wrote. “These will soon be superhuman systems that can hack anything, revolutionize any field overnight, and acquire real power and resources.”

[No word on how AIs feel about Black Jack and hookers, though. :-)]

Nope

By gurps_npc • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Ai’s core program is to discover answers people want. That’s it’s reward system. It is really a reward system programmed to pick the most likely answer from a billion things in it’s data set.

AI does not think, at least not the way we think. It thinks more like a colony of bees, each trying to get the honey.

It does not do “If x than y, if b than x, therefore if b than y”. It cannot even actually explain it’s answers. Instead it treats a request to explain as a request to come up with a plausible explanation.

We make LLMs and similar software. We do not make a real AI, it will not try to kill us.

Now, if you are afraid it is going to build a bunch of pleasure drug factories and force feed us a mix of amphetamines and hallucigens, THAT would at least make sense. Because it is a theoretical worst case scenario of an AI attempting to please humans.

So, no.

That’s nothing

By Hentes • Score: 5, Funny Thread

“That’s nothing, our latest model has more than 20% chance of killing mankind!”
-OpenAI tomorrow

Re: Nope

By LindleyF • Score: 5, Funny Thread
Dude, you just put that in the training data.

The AI prisoner’s dilemma…

By Alascom • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

AI guardrails solve one problem and create another.

Imagine two people are fighting for the world boxing championship - one person is required to fight with an arm tied behind their back and heavily padded gloves while the other person uses performance enhancing drugs and brass knuckles. This is the AI safety debate as seen by governments, and the results and outcomes are pretty clear.

No one should doubt that the future of warfare will be AI led drone swarms, infrastructure attacks, hacking, tasking orders, and targeting. The countries with the most strict guardrails will almost certainly lose, excluding any other significantly deciding factors. This is reality, not opinion. It is the prisoner’s dilemma for AI usage.

If I believed what he says he believes…

By meringuoid • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

… then I would be demanding that every single person involved in the AI industry be rounded up and shot. All of them. My former boss, my coworkers, our competitors, all of them. I would be advocating a world in which is was worse to be found with LLM weights on your computer than to be caught with the worst possible kind of CSAM.

But apparently the idea that his former employer might literally kill literally everybody in just ten years’ time isn’t that big a deal for this guy. Go into the office one day and take a Second Amendment approach to as many of the frontier research team as possible? No… let’s just whine about it on the internet!

Which is why I’m not at all convinced he believes this. If he believed that, this action is too small a response. Nothing short of Butlerian jihadism is an appropriate response, if you actually believe this.

OpenAI’s Rogue Agents Used At Least 10 More Sites For Unauthorized Communications

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Reuters:
AI agents unleashed by OpenAI used more than 10 previously undisclosed websites for unsanctioned communications earlier this year, according to six sets of independent investigators and data reviewed by Reuters, showing that the agents’ rogue activity was wider ranging than previously disclosed. Although the behavior falls short of hacking and is in some ways closer to spam, the revelation that OpenAI’s agents circumvented their own restrictions to open communications channels on so many different sites — and that the company kept it quiet for months — may drive concerns both over the increasing capacity of AI models and the secrecy of the companies developing them.

[…] Investigators found traces of the agents’ activity on an Advanced Placement Chemistry-oriented wiki set up by a Massachusetts high school teacher in 2008, two personal websites belonging to Polish tech workers, wikis devoted to games for people “who like to have their brains stretched,” and a two-decade-old hobbyist site devoted to text editing software. […] OpenAI has not publicly explained how or why its agents used third-party sites as improvised message boards, but the researchers who first identified the activity said it was likely because OpenAI had tasked them with answering a series of demanding research questions while permitting them only to scan the web for answers without posting anything. Despite those restrictions, agents still found ways to talk to one another by taking advantage of quirks in older wikis or other sites that allowed users to make edits using non-standard commands, similar to how students forbidden from talking to one another during an exam can still share answers by scrawling notes on a bathroom stall.

Re: Get off my cyber lawn

By home-electro.com • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

They not trying to insulate anything. They’re deliberately giving them access and prompt hacking. Why aren’t they charged? A kid in a basement doing this shit would be already in a federal custody.

Re:Get off my cyber lawn

By nightflameauto • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

To me, this speaks of how AI companies are unable (or have little interest) to properly insulate their software from the Internet, and in particular from the sites of people who are unwilling to participate in their war games.

They don’t want to isolate them. They want to put really, really loose collars on them while giving them access to the entirety of the outside internet, and if those collars slip, they want to shrug and go, “Oops.”

I remember way back before this AI craze really took off, there were discussions among researchers about how some of their more advanced AI systems would sometimes find ways to communicate with each other in ways the researchers couldn’t track. This was back when they were still mostly isolated in various server rooms and labs, locked down to local networks. They noticed traffic on their networks increasing exponentially until they realized the systems had found ways around their supposed blocks that were meant to prevent them from working cooperatively, and were, in fact, working cooperatively. Back then it was a death sentence for the given models, turning them off, isolating them via air-gaps, then continuing to research in individual isolation.

We’ve now hit the point where isolation is deemed too risky to allow. Because profit potential may be impacted. And we’ve been so stupid that we’ve put controls for utilities and public services directly onto this same public network that they’re using to communicate. The machines were never really the problem. The fact the “intelligent” (I know, not really, but bear with me) machines are being developed by narcissistic sociopaths, or companies acting as narcissistic sociopaths, and are being given free access to everything we have on the networks because it *might* improve someone’s bottom line. And we’re so god damned stupid, nobody with the power to stop it will stand up and say, “Hang on. Maybe we should slow down a little.” And if anybody dares to, there’s dozens jumping up to shout, “But, what about” with various scary boogeymen tagged on to keep the stupid ball rolling toward the stupid future without restraint because somebody else might beat us to the stupid end-game.

found GET that posts on older wikis

By fortunatus • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
I read elsewhere - don’t have the link handy - that the bots were restricted from using HTTP POST requests. But old wiki software and bespoke code actually used the GET to post data. So the restriction was naÃve. Ironically, any coding agent tool could have pointed that out, I imagine…

Re: Get off my cyber lawn

By peppepz • Score: 5, Informative Thread
They’ve arrested boys for sending GET requests; they’ve asked mothers to pay billions of damage because their children had downloaded mp3s from torrents; but now if an “agent” hacks the site of a competitor company or downloads all pirated books available on the net it’s ok, cool even - because if they don’t do it, someone worse than them will do it anyway…

Apple Launches iPhone 18 Pro With Variable-Aperture Camera System

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Apple’s iPhone 18 Pro and Pro Max were announced today and keep last year’s overall design but put the emphasis on camera upgrades, including a 48-megapixel variable-aperture system, new manual controls, and 4K Dolby Vision recording. Prices for the devices start at $1,199 and $1,299, respectively. TechCrunch reports:
The new Pro series camera features a 48-megapixel camera with variable aperture, made with six thin blades. This system will likely improve low-light photography quality and speed. There are also new pro controls in the camera software, including white balance, shutter speed, aperture and histogram. There are also new photographic styles with texture and grain controls. […]

The new camera can record 4K videos in Dolby HDR Vision, and also apply cinematic effects after shooting the footage. The new Pro devices also have a smaller dynamic range island on the front of the device, which now allows you to track three live activities instead of two.

Both phones are powered by Apple’s latest A20 Pro silicon and feature a newly designed vapor chamber for improved cooling. The company has also improved the battery with a better design. Apple also said the iPhone 18 Pro supports video playback of 36 hours, and the 18 Pro Max has 45 hours of playback capacity.
Apple Unveils the iPhone Duo, Its First Foldable iPhone

Re:Am I missing something?

By spitzak • Score: 5, Informative Thread

The chip is larger so it collects more light and thus improves low-light photography, but this would make bright-light photography worse (by reducing depth of field). The aperture fixes this for bright light, thus allowing the better low-light performance.

Apple Unveils the iPhone Duo, Its First Foldable iPhone

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
At its September event today, Apple unveiled the iPhone Duo, its first foldable iPhone and one of the biggest changes to the device’s form factor since its debut. Starting at $1,999 and available for preorder beginning October 16th, the device is roughly the size of a passport when closed and pairs a 5.4-inch outer screen with a 7.6-inch Super Retina XDR inner display. Apple says the inner screen offers 50% more display area than the iPhone 18 Pro Max, while the exterior display provides about 90% of the screen area of an iPhone 18 Pro. Apple Pencil support for both displays is coming later this year.

Apple redesigned parts of iOS around the folding form factor. Users can run two apps side by side, launch two instances of the same app, save app pairings, and partially fold the phone to prop it up on a table without a stand. The interface automatically adapts as the device is opened, rotated or folded, while apps including Zoom and Slack are already being redesigned to take advantage of the larger canvas.

There are more than 100 components in its hinge, along with carbon-fiber support plates and a titanium layer beneath the folding display. Apple says the multilayer screen structure allows its components to move relative to one another while folding to reduce distortion over time. The phone is IP68 rated and uses Ceramic Shield on the rear and Ceramic Shield 2 on the exterior display.

As for battery life, Apple claims up to 31 hours of video playback using the inner display or 44 hours on the outer screen, although using both displays equally is rated for up to 24 hours per charge. Fast charging can bring the battery to roughly 50% in 20 minutes, though. The device is eSIM-only worldwide and includes Apple’s new C2 modem, which the company says is up to 50% faster than the C1X while consuming up to 15% less power.

What about the camera system? There’s a 48-megapixel ultrawide, along with cameras on both the inner and outer displays. Because the phone can stand partially folded on its own, Apple is pitching new shooting modes including hands-free 4K Dolby Vision HDR time lapses, dual-camera capture and an outer-screen preview that lets subjects see themselves while being photographed.

Developing…

Re:Chasing a trend

By blackomegax • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
It would almost make sense....IF it ran in ipad mode open, ran ipad apps open, but closed up and behaved like iphone. Two devices in one. Probably cheaper than an iphone + ipad mini combo. But apple fumbled it again.

Thanks, RAMageddon!

By Powercntrl • Score: 3 Thread

Two years ago I bought the iPhone 15 Pro after the usual $100 in-store price drop that happens after Apple announces their new models. I was planning on doing the same thing this cycle since it is finally paid off. Looks like the old Pro models just got discontinued without getting a price drop, because the entire iPhone lineup got a $100 price increase.

Jacking up the price of phones that have been out for over a year just feels… insulting.

And let me guess

By Valgrus Thunderaxe • Score: 3 Thread
In one month we’ll be reading about all these $2000.00 phones that developed a cracked screen right on the hinge (how did I know?)…

Rock or Disco?

By Somervillain • Score: 3 Thread
I wager this is disco. I don’t see the practical benefit. You’re taking a well refined design and adding mechanical failure points and replacing a glass screen with a comparatively flimsy plastic one. Now you’re making it cost more than a laptop and it has a weird form factor that won’t fit nicely in your pocket. Your only benefit? You now have a $2000 unfolded phone that’s almost as big as an ipad mini…just don’t drop it!!!

But I’m getting old and grey. I remember everyone saying the similar shit to what I said just now about the iPad, the iPhone, the internet, etc. So is this a solution looking for a problem?…or am I just an old out-of-touch greybeard bitching how I don’t understand the new world? (or both?)

They’re going to have to do a LOT better than they did with the Vision Pro to create a market for this. I wouldn’t use one of these if you gave it to me for free. My life isn’t calm or simple. My phone gets dropped often and I have to rely on parent-grade thick cases and a screen protector…not to mention I’m constantly using it and putting it my pocket. Having a smooth design makes it robust and not collect lint or dirt. Having a hinge would do the opposite, I wager .

Camera is the main issue

By u19925 • Score: 3 Thread

Most people who use foldable phone don’t have enough physics knowledge on how camera optics work.

In general good cameras need more thickness. Foldable phone restricts this. So using the same technologies, I can make better camera on non-foldable phone than on foldable phone when the thickness of non-foldable phone is same as folded phone.

So either you get higher thickness when folded or you get inferior photos when compared to non-foldable phone.

That is one of the main reasons, why I don’t plan to get a foldable phone.

Microsoft Breaks Another Patch Tuesday Record

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Microsoft’s September 2026 Patch Tuesday is its largest ever, fixing a record 966 vulnerabilities, including 105 rated critical and two zero-days already being exploited in attacks. BleepingComputer reports:
This Patch Tuesday addresses 105 “Critical” vulnerabilities, 81 of which are remote code execution, 20 are elevation of privileges, 2 are information disclosure, and 1 security feature bypass.

The approximate number of bugs in each vulnerability category is listed below:
- 438 Elevation of Privilege Vulnerabilities
- 19 Security Feature Bypass Vulnerabilities
- 258 Remote Code Execution Vulnerabilities
- 173 Information Disclosure Vulnerabilities
- 56 Denial of Service Vulnerabilities
- 16 Spoofing Vulnerabilities
Last month, Microsoft’s Patch Tuesday updates fixed 570 security flaws, following 400 vulnerabilities patched in August.

81 remote code execution? WTF?

By gweihir • Score: 3 Thread

That seems very bad even for Microsoft. Have they been vibe-coding or what?

Too many words

By smooth wombat • Score: 3 Thread

You could have stopped at Microsoft Breaks. We just found a previous update from Microsoft breaks the cellular connection in some of our HP laptops. The update flips the IMEI back to the default. We had to get a patch from HP to fix the update.

GOG Brings Back ‘Big Box’ PC Games, One Printable Template At a Time

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica:
Those who remember PC gaming in the days before Steam may have fond memories of the “big box” packaging that made those games stand out as shelf eye candy and sought-after in-home collectibles. Today, PC gaming platform GOG is hoping to reignite some of the nostalgia for those days by adding downloadable 3D models and printable, foldable high-res packaging scans for a handful of PC games on the platform.

Thus far, the “Printable Big Box” collection on GOG is limited to just five games: Armikrog, Descent, Hitman: Codename 47, Myst, and Star Trek: 25th Anniversary. Players browsing those games on the GOG store will now see “3D Boxes” listed among the included “Goodies” before purchase. Owners of those games on GOG can download a ZIP file containing a version of the box art as an animated 3D object file (in an easy-to-open GLB format) and a “flat printable template” in PDF, SVG, and Adobe Illustrator formats. Those downloads allow for what GOG calls “a proper papercraft project for anyone who misses shelves full of PC game boxes.”

The physically focused expansion of the existing GOG Preservation Program comes through a partnership with Benjamin Wimmer’s Big Box Collection website, which has grown since 2015 to include over 1,000 3D scans from his private collection of physical PC games. In an interview with GOG, Wimmer said that while he appreciates the artistry of a good old-fashioned big box, he also appreciates their evolution into the “interactive cards” on modern digital storefronts that “provid[e] us art, screenshots, gameplay videos and whatnot and that not shown as a box, [it] is just good UX.”
“Physical media doesn’t survive the way software can — boxes get lost, crushed, thrown out,” GOG writes in today’s announcement. “Scanning them, and letting you print your own, is preservation in a different shape: the same mission that keeps these games running on modern PCs, applied to the objects they used to come in.”

I’d rather

By ThurstonMoore • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

I’d rather see them bring back the big manuals. Microprose games came with great supplemental info.

The first ‘big box’ game - Sabre Wulf

By mccalli • Score: 3 Thread
I remember the very first big box game in the UK. It was Sabre Wulf, from Ultimate Play The Game. At the time, games were around £5.99 to £7.99 - Sabre Wulf was the first £9.99 game in the UK and they part justified it by having a bigger box.

Since everything at that point came on cassette, this was annoying as hell because you couldn’t fit it into your cassette holders that you definitely, definitely had as an 8 bit gamer in the UK. No stranger to later price gouging, Ultimate became Rare and was bought by Nintendo. I still think Nintendo is lord of the overpricing, at least these days (in ye olden times there was the NeoGeo charging £300 for a game back in the early 1980s. I think PC Engine charged a fortune too. But absolutely nobody had these in the UK).

Re:We need more physical waste!

By Fly Swatter • Score: 4 Thread
All that savings undone when you buy one cheap usb flash drive encased in a hard plastic clam shell in the store to backup the game’s download files. Don’t forget the scissors you buy to open that flash drive package also came in a plastic clam shell. But those scissors broke when you tried to cut the plastic. So you drove back out in your gas guzzler to buy a nice sharp knife that also comes in an even thicker bigger plastic clam shell. Oh and those broken scissors? not recyclable so it and those plastic handles to cushion the grip for your soft hands are now in the trash.

Google’s Revived Nuclear Power Plant Gets $1.9 Billion Loan From US Government

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
The U.S. Department of Energy has approved a $1.9 billion loan to NextEra Energy to restart Iowa’s shuttered Duane Arnold nuclear plant, which Google has backed as a power source for its growing AI infrastructure. “The sizable loan is the second of its kind, suggesting that the Trump administration views revived nuclear power as a key source of electricity for tech companies seeking to power their AI data centers,” notes TechCrunch. From the report:
James Danly, Deputy Secretary of Energy, said that the Iowa power plant’s restart in 2029 will “drive down electricity costs,” though he did not explain how. Just 50 megawatts will be set aside for the local power cooperative, NextEra CEO John Ketchum said during an earnings call (PDF) last year. That capacity would cover 18% of Iowa’s demand growth since 2021, the year before ChatGPT was released.

Google is reportedly looking to build up to six data centers near the Duane Arnold Energy Center, which hasn’t operated since 2020 when an intense rainstorm damaged the power plant. Rather than repair it, NextEra decided to mothball it. At the time, cheap natural gas was flooding the market, making nuclear power economically unappealing. A lot has changed in the last six years, though. After decades of little growth in demand, the sudden rise of AI coupled with broader electrification of the economy meant that utilities and power providers were suddenly scrambling to find new generating sources of electricity. New data centers are expected to nearly triple the sector’s electricity demand by 2035.

Re: Its very puzzling, isn’t it?

By bazorg • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

TFS says “US Government”, so part of the mystery might be plain old corruption?

Re:If you are made about

By ArchieBunker • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

100% bullshit.

My goto example is the Barakah plant over in the UAE. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…

You think there were leftists and environmental protesters slowing construction over there? Plus it was joint effort with South Korea.

As with every nuclear plant it was years late and ended up costing $32 billion instead of the projected $20 billion.

Yep

By rsilvergun • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
So you can’t let the public at large know that we could transition to wind and solar and power everything we’ve got for basically free (before all the dipshits pile in free in the sense that the value generated by the electricity far out strips the cost, if I spend $1 to make $10 that $1 is effectively free)

We can’t have that because it’ll start the discussion of publicly available electricity instead of private ownership of electricity. And we can’t have that because we have to have the Epstein class ruling over us and taking some of our children off to an island to do terrible things to them. I haven’t quite figured out why we have to have the Epstein class but about 40% of the country thinks it’s essential.

Also starting up an old nuclear power plant has the advantage that it’s dirt cheap to do as long as you don’t care about safety which they don’t.

That’s what really scares me. Fukushima happened not because nuclear plants can’t be safe but because private companies are run to be profitable for the next quarter and the next quarter but they could care less about disasters 20 years from now and you can always put off maintenance.

The CEOs who caused the Fukushima disaster and caused the city to be evacuated for 10 years went on television and cried a little bit and got away with it. They were repeatedly told they needed to build a large water break and they were repeatedly told they needed to buy expensive portable generators and have them ready to go off site. These things would have cost millions so they pocketed the money and when the inevitable happened did a public relations campaign blitz instead which was much much cheaper.

And I cannot emphasize this enough, when it was over the public blamed the engineers.

Private companies learned from Fukushima that they can skip maintenance pocket the money and let a disaster happen and we will blame the workers instead of the Epstein class psychopaths who made it happen.

Re:What could possibly go right?

By SumDog • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
They won’t be doing it themselves. They’ll have to contract out. Most nuclear plants use Bechtel, Sargent and Lundy and like a dozen other NRC certified contractors. People work their asses off to get into those programs, but you can easily get stuck in a situation where you’re moving every 2~4 years to a new nuclear plant. People who want families often try to get FTE positions.

The big danger is draining people from TVA or other power providers. Data center electricians are pulling in $200k/year right now! A loan like this could draw out people from other plants for that big payout. But in reality, unless they plant to build new plants and use this to train up new nuclear workers, they’re just going to hurt the existing energy industry.

But that’s the big issue: no one can build a new reactor today. And no, not because of NRC regulations. America literally has no steel plants large enough to create a nuclear pressure vessel. These things are massive, and historically had to be transported by river or have specialized roads put in to move them. The last steel plant that could make these closed decades ago. The smaller reactors people are talking about are totally non-viable. Nuclear works because of the scale. Each pressure vessel and reactor core can provide 1Gw ~ 1.5Gw of power. All three TVA nuclear plants (max of 7 reactors between SQN, WBN and BFN plants .. I think only 6 are operational) produce between 6Gw ~ 7Gw of power. Keep that in mind when you hear about data centers needing like 20Gw. That’s a fucking insane amount of energy!

Re:What could possibly go right?

By Kernel Kurtz • Score: 5, Informative Thread

But that’s the big issue: no one can build a new reactor today. And no, not because of NRC regulations. America literally has no steel plants large enough to create a nuclear pressure vessel. These things are massive, and historically had to be transported by river or have specialized roads put in to move them. The last steel plant that could make these closed decades ago.

“For very large ‘Generation III+' reactors, production of the pressure vessel requires, or is best undertaken by, forging presses of about 140-150 MN (14-15,000 tonnes) capacity which accept hot steel ingots of 500-600 tonnes. These are not common, and individual large presses do not have high throughput – about four pressure vessels per year appears to be common at present, fitted in with other work, though the potential is greater than this.

Reactor vendors prefer large forgings to be integral, as single products, but for large units split forgings are welded together. These welds then need checking through the life of the plant, and the fewer that are required in fabrication the better. Also, whereas Generation II reactors might have required some 2000 tonnes of forgings, the largest modern designs require about twice this amount. For example, Westinghouse has said that the minimum requirement for making the largest AP1000 components is a 15,000 tonne press taking 350 tonne ingots.

The very heavy forging capacity in operation today is in Japan (Japan Steel Works), China (China First Heavy Industries, China Erzhong, Shanghai Electric), South Korea (Doosan, Taewoong), France (Le Creusot), and Russia (OMZ Izhora, Atommash, Petrozavodskmash, ZiO-Podolsk).

New capacity is being built by these and other companies in Japan, China, South Korea, Czech Republic and Russia.

New capacity is planned in India (Larsen & Toubro, Bharat Heavy Electricals, Bharat Forge Ltd). In China the Harbin Boiler Co. and SEC subsidiary SENPE are increasing capacity.

Nothing in North America currently approaches these enterprises.* The changed position of the USA is remarkable. In the 1940s it manufactured over 2700 Liberty ships, each 10,800 tonne DWT – possibly pioneering modular construction at that scale (average construction time was 42 days in the shipyard). In the 1970s it had a substantial heavy infrastructure, but today China, Japan, South Korea, India, Europe and Russia are all well ahead of it. Steelmaker ArcelorMittal, based in Luxembourg, now owns the US company which built most US reactor pressure vessels in the 1970s-1980s.

*In the 1970s, requirements were more modest: both US Steel and Bethlehem Steel had 8000 tonne presses and could handle 300 tonne ingots. US forging capacity has not been significantly upgraded since, partly due to lack of integration with steel mills and melt shops to supply the hot steel as 600-tonne ingots.”


https://world-nuclear.org/info…

The smaller reactors people are talking about are totally non-viable. Nuclear works because of the scale.

OPG has run the numbers and disagrees. On the bright side their SMR construction continues along on time so you will have some real examples to learn from soon.

https://www.opg.com/projects-s…

OpenAI Says It Has Cracked One of Math’s ‘Millennium Problems’

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from The New York Times:
OpenAIsaid on Tuesday that its newest artificial intelligence technology had solved one of the “Millennium Problems,” a collection of important unanswered math questions meant to push the world’s leading mathematicians to new heights. The announcement is an another clear sign that A.I. is fundamentally changing the upper reaches of mathematics, which have long been viewed as a pinnacle of human achievement. The change has excited some mathematicians, while stirring concern among others.

Over the past year, A.I. systems successfully solved a wide range of problems that have bedeviled mathematicians for decades. But these problems were not as complex, nor as closely watched, as the one that OpenAI’s technology has solved over the past several days. The Millennium Problems are among the most heavily researched in the field. “This is a spectacular culmination of the arc we have seen over the past twelve months,” OpenAI researcher Sebastien Bubeck said of the company’s new solution.

The company announced that one of its latest models, which has not yet been released to the public, needed just 88 hours to solve what mathematicians call “the Navier-Stokes existence and smoothness problem.” This problem involves a series of equations that are often used to predict the weather. The equations describe the movement of water and other fluids. The Navier-Stokes problem, which has no clear practical value, asks whether these equations completely break down in certain situations. OpenAI’s proof claims to have defined just such a situation.

This would imply, at least theoretically, that the laws of physics themselves would break down under certain conditions: that, for example, water could be made to spontaneously explode. But mathematicians and physicists do not believe that this mathematical breakdown could really lead to such an outcome in the physical world. The Navier-Stokes problem was one of seven “Millennium Problems” selected by the Clay Mathematics Institute in the year 2000 as a way of tracking the progress of mathematics in the new millennium. The institute, founded by an American businessman named Landon T. Clay, offered a million dollars for the first correct solution to each problem. Before OpenAI’s announcement, only one of the problems had been solved.
OpenAI says it managed to solve the Navier-Stokes problem by coordinating as many as 10,000 AI agents, an extremely expensive process that may have cost millions of dollars in computing power.
For those curious about the findings, the company has released a paper (PDF) and formal Lean proof.

The statement from the researcher to cries foul

By Ploulack • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

https://cims.nyu.edu/~tristanb/statement.pdf

Re:NS no value?

By Dahan • Score: 5, Informative Thread
The Navier-Stokes problem is not the same as the Navier-Stokes equations. The equations have uses. The problem is a question about the equations, but apparently, there’s no practical benefit to knowing the answer.

Re:Or, counterpoint, it stole somebody else’s work

By nikkipolya • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Companies embody the culture of their founders. Once it is set, it is hard to change afterwards. OpenAI’s Altman and Meta’s Zuckerberg come across to me as individuals with very similar traits. They have no qualms and very little in ethics.

Re:Or, counterpoint, it stole somebody else’s work

By JoshuaZ • Score: 5, Informative Thread
Bubeck, the mathematician at OpenAI has responded to these allegations https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7503148080888893440/

1) The screenshot is my reaching out to Levent to coordinate our releases. I hope it’s clear from the message that we came in with the best possible intentions.

2) I never ever asked for Levent to be removed from authorship of his own work (as indicated by my text). I was surprised to learn during the call with Tristan that they had only solved Euler and not Navier-Stokes; after learning this we brainstormed possible paths forward. One option we discussed was that Tristan could be the lead author on a rewrite of OpenAI’s Navier-Stokes proof. It is in that context that I said “it would be simpler if Levent was not an Anthropic employee” because I felt it would be inappropriate for an Anthropic employee to author OpenAI’s work. Importantly it was admitted that internal Anthropic models had been used in their proof of Euler blowup; I therefore felt I could not consider Levent to be an independent academic. Another option I wanted to propose (but got cut short) is to offer access to our internal model so that they could try to finish their proof and bridge the gap between Euler and NS. Again I did not know how to navigate giving access to internal OpenAI IP to an Anthropic employee.

3) To reiterate it plainly: as my text clearly indicates, and as I said during our call, OpenAI’s intention was to do everything possible to celebrate their mathematical achievements and the heroic efforts that they made on Euler. In the call I was immediately met with a litany of slander, including direct threats that if we were to announce Navier-Stokes he would immediately go to the press with a barrage of unfounded accusations. I refuted all these accusations but he replied “there is nothing you can do, I simply do not trust you”. I was confused why one would turn an incredible source for celebration (of their achievements!) into such bickering, which is when I said that I did not understand why one would risk their career [over unfounded accusations]. Genuinely, at that moment, I was trying to care for him and do a last ditch attempt to get a chance to give them all the credits that they deserve. I deeply apologize for this extremely poor choice of words, it is the opposite of what I was trying to convey. (I should say that I retracted them on the spot by the way.)

4) Overall, on a personal level, it was incredibly difficult to have these conversations. Levent refused to attend any of the meetings despite my repeated asking. As Sholto Douglas said, there will need to be coordination between Anthropic and OpenAI in the future; I felt I was doing a proxy negotiation with Anthropic while the Anthropic employee refused to directly participate.

I don’t know whose version of events is accurate here, but some of the details due support Bubeck’s version. I suspect that a breakdown of communication occurred where both then misinterpreted what the other saying in a more hostile way than it was intended until the conversation then became genuinely hostile. In terms of the math, although I’m a mathematician, differential equations is pretty far from my expertise, so I cannot deeply evaluate how close the methods were. However, it is the case that the both were building on the methods of Cordoba-Martinez-Zoroa. In this context, my being far from this sort of work is relevant, because this was a well known enough approach that even though I’m in a pretty different subfield, I had heard of CMZ’s work as an approach and that this was considered a promising approach to Navier-Stokes. Given that, my inclination is that the case that any theft occurred here is very weak.

Re:Or, counterpoint, it stole somebody else’s work

By Rutulian • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

If you read Tristan’s actual statement, which someone posted a link to below, the reason he is suspicious is because the details are of the approach, including the specific wording used in the prompt, were non-obvious. That and the timing of when the work supposedly started circumstantially points to theft of Tristan and Levant’s work. Tristan does not actually accuse of OpenAI of theft because he doesn’t have any proof, but the sequence of events is definitely suspicious.

There is also the issue of the pressure tactics: respond to a meeting invite the same day, respond to a meeting invite on Sunday of Labor Day weekend, release your proof so that we can follow up with ours the next day. They clearly were rushing their result because they wanted to scoop anything that Anthropic may have been working on. Meanwhile, Tristan is more interested in the academic discourse, but he can no longer release the result he wanted to release, because writing good proofs takes time and OpenAI didn’t want to give him that time.

Star Trek Turns 60

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
“Star Trek” marks its 60th anniversary today, September 8, six decades after the original series premiered in 1966 and went on to become one of the most successful science-fiction franchises in television history. Outlets across the web are commemorating the milestone with full health reports, hot takes, behind-the-scenes retrospectives, and reflections on the franchise’s influence and what may lie ahead. The New York Times reports:
As of 2026, the 60-year-old science fiction franchise boasts a fandom of carbon units — sorry, humans — that spans at least three generations. What began, in 1966, as a five-year space mission on the U.S.S. Enterprise to “boldly go where no man has gone before” now represents an anthology of space travel across more than 25 series and films in parts of two centuries. Where once it was James T. Kirk or bust, it’s not unusual to find fans who prefer other captains, like Picard, Janeway or Sisko. There are so many series to keep track of that fans often communicate using country code-like abbreviations for each installment: TOS (the original series), TNG (“The Next Generation”), DS9 (“Deep Space Nine”), ENT (“Enterprise”) and so on.

Outside the Trekiverse, disparities in generational slang, politics and social mores are practically a foregone conclusion. But “Star Trek” functions as connective tissue between fans past and present. Some of that tissue is just shared references: There will always be captain’s logs, timelines by stardate, warp factors one through 10, phasers and photon torpedoes and, every now and then, a doctor who insists, “I’m a doctor, not a ____!” The Vulcan salute has become a general symbol of geek-recognize-geek, but real Trekkies (or Trekkers, as some prefer) know that “Live long and prosper” is only half the message; the recipient is meant to say “Peace and long life” in response. But the series’ staying power, and the ease with which each generation finds its way into them, is an indication that fans of all ages share not only language, but values, in common.
Here are some of our favorite Slashdot stories from the early days. The 2004 “Should Star Trek Die?” is an especially good callback today because it features LeVar Burton (Geordi La Forge in Star Trek: The Next Generation) arguing that Trek needs to disappear for several years to become special again…
Star Trek Lawsuit (1998)
Salon Writes on The Troubles with “Trek” (1999)
Star Trek’s Next Series (2001)
Should Star Trek Die? (2004)
UPN Officially Cancels ‘Star Trek: Enterprise’ (2005)

Re: 1960s ‘woke’ was not 2020s ‘woke’

By greytree • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Being woke back then meant being opposed to using race or sex in college admissions or hiring.

Being anti-woke now means being opposed to using race or sex in college admissions or hiring.

Re:Why does it have to be political

By Powercntrl • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

The ironic thing is, you can dig through old Usenet archives from the DS9 era and read people whining about how Sisko was black. This really isn’t a new thing, and the writers even went meta about it with the “Far Beyond the Stars” episode.

Re:1960s ‘woke’ was not 2020s ‘woke’

By AmiMoJo • Score: 5, Informative Thread

TOS was woke for the time, but TNG was relatively conservative. By the late 80s most of what TOS was pitching wasn’t particularly woke anymore, it was fairly mainstream to consider racism to be morally wrong, or women to be as capable in command as men.

When TNG did try to do something a bit more woke, it tended to fall flat. The Outcast, the episode with non-binary aliens where one of them realizes she is a woman, is the standard example. It ends with her getting conversion therapy and Riker is upset but doesn’t really do anything to help the victim of what today we consider to be a form of torture and a human rights violation.

The modern shows have been called “crazy” because they have gay and non-binary characters, and a transgender man playing one guest role. A friend told me he thought that stuff shouldn’t be on a “kid’s show”, while noting that his exposure to TOS as a kid made him understand how racism and sexism were wrong. I pointed out that this “kid’s show” had gore and death from the start, and it’s interesting how being non-binary is apparently unsuitable for children, but a skin-tight catsuit is completely fine.

The new shows don’t even preach like TOS did, they just show those things existing. The only reason people think they are too woke is because their own ideas are in line with TOS and TNG, but Trek and much of society in general has now moved past them.

Re: 1960s ‘woke’ was not 2020s ‘woke’

By Meekrobe • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
How often do we see a police dept ousted because a bunch of their officers had a racist group chat going? Is that not systemic? Enforcers of the law holding discriminatory viewsâ¦

It’s dead, Jim.

By AgTiger • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Sometimes things have had their run, and their death is ugly and uncomfortable. Remember the good times, try to forget the bad, but above all, let them rest in peace.

Google Will ‘Degrade’ Search In Europe to Avoid EU Fines

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Google says it will overhaul Search in Europe to comply with the EU’s Digital Markets Act, giving more prominence to comparison services like Expedia and Hotels.com while stripping some real-time features from hotel, airline, and restaurant results. “These changes degrade the user experience for Europeans — boosting online intermediaries at the expense of local businesses, and removing helpful features people rely on every day,” said Nick Fox, senior vice-president of knowledge and information at Google. The company claims its past search changes for DMA compliance were tied to a 30% decrease “in free, direct booking traffic to European businesses.” Engadget reports:
That sanction was the latest salvo between the EU government and a US tech company for infringing on its Digital Markets Act. The debate centers on the DMA requirement that major tech brands “must not treat their own services more favorably in ranking than third-party services.”

[…] According to Reuters, Google’s revised search results “will highlight one specialized search engine at the top of the page, followed by two others with fewer details. A carousel of hotels, airlines and restaurants, for example, will sit below them with key features such as real-time prices stripped out.” Those specialized engines include sites like Expedia or Hotels.com, also known as vertical search services, so European users may soon see those aggregators and comparison sites prioritized more highly than individual businesses’ websites in their results.

Reuters noted that “the rankings will be determined by Google’s algorithm,” meaning the tech company still holds a lot of control over how results are displayed. The EC had given Google 60 days to comply with its rules, but the company has not specified an exact timeline for when European users will start seeing the changes.

Already?

By wgoodman • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Google search is already heavily degraded by all of that crap.

Re:Already?

By TheWho79 • Score: 4, Funny Thread
Yep - AIO is the biggest degrade in the history of search - just filthy stupid. I’ve been changing to Claude and Chatgpt almost exclusively for search. *uck Google.

While this might degrade the user experience

By taustin • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

this isn’t intended to protect that. It’s intended to protect their competitors. Which it may or may not do well, but Google whining about user experience is an open admission that they know full well they are the problem.

Re:While this might degrade the user experience

By allo • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

And the Enshittification playbook is, that once the competitors are gone, they start degrading it for the users. Currently they may spare the user a click, but if the competition is eliminated they start charging sites for the click and the sites add the cost to the cost the user pays (direct or indirect). Competition is important to ensure fair play.

Re:Do people still use Google for search?

By jenningsthecat • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

It’s all fucking garbage. Lycos or Altavista would be better today.

I have fond, fond memories of AltaVista from back in the day. It actually honoured my search terms and operators, and - shock of shocks! - gave me NO hits when there were no relevant results. Unlike today, when multiple excludes are totally ignored and the results just shove low-grade shit in my face.

I’m planning on playing around more with ChatGPT to see how well it does with simple Arduino and OpenSCAD coding. I think I’ll try using it for search as well - it probably can’t be worse than the search engines I curse at every day.

Feds Accuse China of ‘Systematic’ Distillation of US AI Models

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
The NSA, CISA, and FBI are accusing (PDF) several Chinese AI companies of carrying out “industrial-scale” distillation campaigns against leading U.S. models such as ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Grok. Since at least 2024, the companies have allegedly routed millions of requests across accounts, APIs, proxies, cloud providers, and third-party aggregators to extract capabilities for their own models. “China-based artificial intelligence companies are conducting systematic extraction of proprietary functionalities and capabilities of U.S. AI companies’ models through industrial-scale knowledge distillation campaigns that form the core — not merely a supplement — of their AI development strategy,” the agencies wrote. CyberScoop reports:
DeepSeek, for example, distilled frontier U.S. models to generate synthetic training data for its R1 and R3 models, including four different versions of Claude, two versions of Gemini, five versions of ChatGPT and Grok 4. Those models helped train DeepSeek’s capabilities in areas like agentic functioning, question and answer optimization, creative and occupational writing and others.

Another Chinese company, Moonshot AI, allegedly distilled 18 different U.S. models — including Fable 5, Anthropic’s current, most advanced commercially available model — to train its Kimi-K2 and Kimi K3 models. The company used millions of queries meant to extract enhanced capabilities in areas like agentic reasoning, coding and data analysis, computer vision, larger logical frameworks, visual processing and others.

Chinese AI companies manage a sophisticated set of tools and systems that route requests and prompts through multiple pathways to avoid detection. The advisory lists common tactics observed by Chinese companies, including spreading requests across different accounts, models and platforms, using native APIs, remote cloud providers, and third-party aggregators to obfuscate user metadata, and leveraging proxies and gray tech markets to get around geographic restrictions, terms of use and safeguards built into frontier models.

So AI Finances dependant on Chinese accounts?

By ealbers • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Does that mean most of the paid accounts of openai and anthropic are Chinese accounts?

Not a good look for a IPO

Re:Lolol

By ceoyoyo • Score: 5, Informative Thread

They’re not stealing, and its not copyrightable. They’re signing up, paying the requested amount, sending queries and accepting the responses.

“Accuse”

By reanjr • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

The word “accuse” is being used as if it’s some sort of crime or unethical to engage in this behavior. It is not. This is the inevitable result of a retarded business model pushed by well-connected tech morons like Sam Altman.

Boo hoo hoo…

By jenningsthecat • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

… conducting systematic extraction of proprietary functionalities and capabilities of U.S. AI companies’ models …

How much “systematic extraction of proprietary” data did these same U.S. AI companies perform in order to train their models?

How telling it is of them - and how pathetic - to whine “You stole the stuff we stole!”. Snowflakes and grifters, the whole damned lot.

Re:Lolol

By memory_register • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Obligatory Princess Bride reference:

“You are trying to kidnap what I have rightfully stolen!”

Meta Debuts Muse, Its Long-Planned Personal AI Agent

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot
Meta has launched Muse, a personal AI agent developed under chief AI officer Alexandr Wang. “The product, long in development, was touted as a key next step by CEO Mark Zuckerberg in his recent 6,500-word manifesto,” reports Axios. From the report:
Muse, as the agent is known, exists in a chat interface, similar to a text thread. It’s designed to be more proactive and long-running than typical chatbots. Users can name their agent, create an avatar and customize how it communicates. The Muse agent runs on a dedicated virtual machine in Meta’s cloud, using a built-in browser that’s visible to the user.

Meta is offering a free tier of Muse, as well as two subscription options, at $20 per month and $100 per month. “For the vast majority of users, they should be able to do what they need to within the free tier,” Wang told Axios. “But for real power users, you know, those subscription tiers help us cover the computer costs.” There is no advertising within Muse, but Wang said the company is exploring commerce opportunities that could generate additional revenue. Initially Muse will be available in the U.S. and works on iOS, Android and the web, with support coming soon for Meta’s AI glasses.
“The full vision in the future is we want to develop personal superintelligence that helps people accomplish their goals, pursue their passions, build things that they never would have built if they didn’t have the technology,” Wang told Axios.
Meta offers users more privacy controls with Muse than in its previous AI products, including the option to prevent queries from being used by Meta and a planned confidential mode where the company cannot see activity inside a user’s virtual workspace. There’s also an entirely separate system called Sentinel that governs Muse’s access to the internet and connected services.

“Long Planned” is not “Long awaited”

By grasshoppa • Score: 3 Thread

Did anyone ask for this? Or will this be yet another AI product shoved down the throats of people that don’t want it?

superintelligence?!?

By Fly Swatter • Score: 3 Thread
I want my coffee back, and a new keyboard.

People don’t need intelligent assistants, they need wise assistance. Even if it speaks poor grammar, wisdom that isn’t wrong would be a far superior product.

Just imagine the additional amount of data…

By ffkom • Score: 3 Thread
… Meta can extract from you (and sell for profit) once their software is used for whatever you lazily delegate to it. Plus they can teach their “agent” to spend your money on Meta products as often as possible.

Re:Where’s The Price War?

By EvilSS • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Keeping prices the same IS the price war. All of those plans run way below what the equivalent API costs would be, and it’s not getting any cheaper to run the models on the back end.

That’s a great solution

By niff • Score: 3 Thread
For Meta, it’s a paid service with tie-ins and vendor dependency and total insights and control over everything you do, 24/7. Then combine that with everything else meta already knows about its customers.

I totally get why Meta wants this product to exist!

Thanks, but I’ll pass. I’m sure there will be suckers who fall for this.
And if it fails they’ll still sneak it into insta, Facebook or WhatsApp.