Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Humanoid Robots Run 100 Meters Faster Than Usain Bolt’s Record Pace
  2. Dr. Dre Says He Uses AI To Produce Songs
  3. After 50 Years, Physicists May Have Finally Found a Particle Made of Pure Force
  4. SCO Successor Xinuos Asks Court to Rehear Its Claims Against IBM/Red Hat Over Project Monterey
  5. One-Third of Web Pages are Now Written With AI, Says Pew Research
  6. Could Mecha Comet’s Linux PC-Phone Hybrid Be the Future of Linux Smartphones?
  7. The Global Race To Make a Practical Quantum Computer Just Took a Big Leap Forward
  8. Twitch And Amazon Hit With Lawsuit for Training AI With Streamers’ Content
  9. OpenAI Faces Safety Scrutiny After Introducing ‘ChatGPT For Teens’
  10. Iran-linked Cyberattackers Shut Down a UK Power Plant for Four Days
  11. Slovakia Finds Russian Backdoor In Traffic Speed Cameras
  12. Stanford Economist Now Believes an AI Job Apocalypse Is Unlikely
  13. 23 Years After SimCity 4’s Release, ‘Eternal Commuter’ Bug Finally Fixed
  14. Canonical is Funding a PhD to Automate C to Rust Translation
  15. Supply Chain Issues Delaying US Grid Batteries’ Installation

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Humanoid Robots Run 100 Meters Faster Than Usain Bolt’s Record Pace

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Two humanoid robots competing at the World Humanoid Robot Games in Beijing on Saturday ran the 100-meter dash faster than Usain Bolt’s 9.58-second world-record time. "[T]he Tiangong Ultra humanoid robot completed the 100-meter dash in 9.39 seconds during a preliminary heat,” reports Engadget. “Developed by Beijing Humanoid Robot Innovation Center, the record-holding robot overtook Honor’s Lightning robot, which completed the sprint in 9.47 seconds. From the report:
Despite the impressive finish times, don’t expect these humanoid robots to be used for any commercial purposes yet. After their sprints, they slammed directly into pads and some even required human assistance to be stretchered off the course. However, it’s still a major improvement from last year’s inaugural World Humanoid Robot Games, where the Tiangong Ultra won the 100-meter dash in 21.5 seconds.
Beijing has also hosted a humanoid robot half-marathon, where Honor’s Lightning won in 50 minutes and 26 seconds, which also beat the pace of another human world record.
“The World Humanoid Robot Games in Beijing kicked off August 22 and will run until the 26, hosting thousands of robot participants competing in more than just track and field events, including soccer, table tennis and boxing,” adds Engadget.

Dr. Dre Says He Uses AI To Produce Songs

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Gizmodo:
Dr. Dre, the pioneering rapper and seven-time Grammy-winning producer behind hit songs like Tupac’s “California Love” and Eminem’s “The Real Slim Shady,” is very much pro using artificial intelligence tools to make music. In an interview with the New York Times, Dr. Dre and Interscope Records co-founder Jimmy Iovine spoke about artificial intelligence’s recent foray into music production, with the producer characterizing those who oppose AI song generation tools as “afraid of learning new things.” “I don’t see it as a threat. I think the only people that see it as a threat are the people who have trouble creating,” Dr. Dre said. “I had a discussion with a few people a few days ago. They were against AI, and I’m like, ‘OK, you sound like the person that would have been against the drum machine when it came out.’ Or synthesizers, right?”

[…] Iovine, the music executive and Dr. Dre’s partner in Beats by Dre, for his part, says he doesn’t “see the downside at all.” “There will be some crappy music. There’s crappy music now,” Iovine told the NYT. “In the studio, when gifted people have AI, they’re going to make better records.” Dr. Dre said he uses AI in producing “as a tool to see what it would do with what I just did.” The award-winning producer also said he is definitely not alone among his peers in his stance on AI either: many producers use AI but fear to admit it. Iovine calls them “closet AI producers,” and says Timbaland, the four-time Grammy-winning singer-producer behind a long list of hits like “Promiscuous” with Nelly Furtado, is also one.

Re:I bet he does it for 2 reasons

By Anonymous Coward • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

More like he’s lazy and his talent was being at the right place at the right time

Copyright shmopyright, right?

By Arnonyrnous Covvard • Score: 3 Thread

Just don’t expect me to pay for it.

I for one…

By greytree • Score: 3 Thread
I for one do NOT want my doctor using AI.

Now get off my decks, sonny.

After 50 Years, Physicists May Have Finally Found a Particle Made of Pure Force

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Gluons are the quantum ‘Gorilla Glue’ involved in binding quarks together, ScienceAlert reminds us. But for nearly 50 years, physicists have hunted for “glueballs”, exotic particles predicted by this theory of the strong interaction — the only type of particle in nature composed entirely of force mediators:

Now, a collaboration working at a collider in Beijing says it has the clearest evidence yet that a known particle called X(2370) is dominated by one of these elusive states… Physicists sifted through the wreckage of high-energy particle collisions to find strong evidence of this glueball, made predominantly of gluons — massless force carriers of the strong interaction between quarks… The new evidence for this exotic, unstable glueball’s ephemeral existence comes from a recent preprint on arXiv, presented at the International Conference on High Energy Physics in Brazil… This collaboration uses the Beijing Electron Positron Collider II, a particle accelerator and collider that smashes electrons into their antimatter counterparts, called positrons, to probe perplexing particle physics.

The resultant glueball is an “unprecedented form of matter,” says Jin Shan, a particle physicist at Nanjing University and one of the research team’s leaders. “It not only enables the theory describing strong interactions to pass its most rigorous test, but also vastly expands the boundaries of our understanding of the physical world,” he told Fan Chen at South China Morning Post… Previously, in a study published in the journal Physical Review Letters in 2024, the researchers analyzed 10 billion meson decay events. They measured the X(2370) particle’s mass and spin parity — a property that dictates its interactions and almost-instantaneous decay — for the first time, finding complete agreement between their experimental values and predictions. Now, they’ve identified its additional decay modes and determined its flavor-singlet nature, “the most important characteristic of a glueball....”

The authors describe their work as the clearest experimental result to emerge from nearly 50 years of glueball searches, supporting the long-standing theoretical prediction that gluons can bind together into a new form of matter.
The discovery "“highlights advances in technology and analytical techniques that have recently revealed another decades-in-the-making physics mystery,” the article points out.

“More experiments are needed to further confirm and constrain the prototypes of the highly esoteric glueball; in other words, more particle smashing.”

Extra! Extra!

By martin-boundary • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Action-at-a-distance! Get your action-at-a-distance here or there! Packaged in a wave! No field of enquiry, is too small.

You, sir, do you want to read the story? Only two cents!

Extra! Extra!

Slashdot Reruns

By Arnonyrnous Covvard • Score: 3 Thread

https://science.slashdot.org/s…

Name Suggestion

By UnresolvedExternal • Score: 4, Funny Thread
We should call it the Chuck Norris particle - there is no force greater than his.

SCO Successor Xinuos Asks Court to Rehear Its Claims Against IBM/Red Hat Over Project Monterey

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
The long legal battle over ownership of Linux “is closer than ever to ending,” reports the Register, “after a panel of three judges ruled a claim against IBM and Red Hat isn’t valid, and that time has expired for further action.”
In 2021, an heir to SCO settled with IBM for $14.25 million — a sum that reflects the fact SCO had for years failed to produce strong evidence to back its claims. Another of SCO’s legal successors, Xinuos, filed a new claim that IBM should be on the hook because Big Blue knew it did not own the code it contributed to Linux but instead had a non-exclusive license to use it. Xinuos argued that when IBM contributed Project Monterey code to Linux [25 years ago], it breached that license.

Xinuos eventually took that argument to the US District Court for the Southern District of New York — and failed to convince it that IBM and Red Hat had a case to answer. Xinuos appealed, and on August 10th the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit decided [PDF] not to revisit the District Court’s decision, agreeing that the original legalese governing Project Monterey means it’s too late to re-litigate the matter. The Appeals Court also agreed that Xinuos tried to frame the case as a licensing issue but failed, instead arguing that the issue was really about ownership.

That ain’t all, folks, because Xinuos intends to file a petition to have the case re-heard by the full bench of the Court of Appeals. That hardly ever happens, unless the court finds significant errors or major legal issues that make a rehearing worthwhile. Law firm Kaplan says the Second Circuit has allowed reviews of less than 0.03 percent of the cases it has handled. So perhaps this matter is now close to a final resolution.
Back in 2000 Slashdot interviewed one of the presidents of SCO.

Re:About Fsck’n time…

By sg_oneill • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Yeah the elephant in the corner of the room was always that SCO never even owned those rights to unix to begin with , it was licensing them from Novell and Novell where *very unhappy* with SCOs antics as the licensing text specifically forbade this sort of nonsense without Novell’s go-ahead which they definitely did not give (I assume MicroFocus now have those rights since they swallowed Novell a decade ago. Actually googling it, Microfocus got swallowed by “Open Text”. Who the fuck are open text?! Their wikipedia page seems to suggest they’ve swallowed half of silicon valley, but I havent heard of them before. I’m old :(

PJ must be losing her mind over this!

By haruchai • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

23 years since she founded Groklaw specifically to cover this lawsuit and it’s STILL not over??
WTAF??

Re:About Fsck’n time…

By Sique • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
It was Attachmate, which swallowed Novell and spun of for instance SuSE Linux before being itself acquired by Micro Focus. SuSE S.A. is now a separate company in Luxembourg, and maybe, they are holding the original UNIX licenses, as it would fit into their portfolio.

It was never intended to end

By Laxator2 • Score: 5, Informative Thread

The purpose of the original lawsuit started in 2003 was never to “win” anything.
Remember that it was Microsoft who bankrolled it in the first place, and the fact that the lawsuit started in the year 2003 is no coincidence.
2004 was declared the much-derided “Year of the Linux Desktop”, and it was correct; Linux had become good enough to use on the desktop in any corporation. (I’ve been using Linux since 1998).
Just look at the Munich Linux migration as an example.
Microsoft desperately needed some way to convince the MBAs running corporations to keep Linux off the desktop as cloud and Azure were not a thing back in 2004.
They found it in the form of legal risk; use Linux, get sued.
Back in 2003 it created quite a stir, with AutoZone and BMW being directly sued by SCO for their use of Linux.
Almost all potential corporate users got spooked, as the lawsuits got widely publicized.
A few generations of MBAs graduated learning that Linux is a legal risk, and now, even if Linux runs the entire infrastructure of most corporations, you are allowed to access it only via a text terminal.
In 2026 Microsoft has captured all the corporate e-mail market (all of it hosted on Azure by now) via some well-publicized data breaches of in-house servers at the beginning of Nadella’s reign.
Most of their revenue is from the cloud, but they still want Linux off the desktop.
What people use at work will want to use at home as well.
Therefore, there will be attempts to keep this lawsuit going for as long as possible.

One-Third of Web Pages are Now Written With AI, Says Pew Research

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
A Pew Research senior data scientist analyzed 500,000 English-language webpages from the past five years with an AI detection tool to estimate how many were likely written or edited by AI:

Of all the pages in this sample, 10% show significant signs of AI authorship… If we filter old webpages out of our samples and look at only the pages published after the release of ChatGPT, the trend is even more pronounced. In the July 2026 snapshot, signs of AI authorship can be found in over one-third of pages published after ChatGPT was released. This is in line with other studies that have shown that large shares of recently published pages on the internet were likely written or substantially edited by AI.

AI-authored text is not evenly spread across the web. When ChatGPT was first released, the kinds of linguistic patterns that can signal AI authorship appeared at similar rates across the main top-level web domains (.com, .org, .edu and .gov). But in samples from 2026, around one-in-ten pages with a .com domain show signs of AI authorship — about double the share on .org domains (4.6%), and 10 times the rate on .edu or .gov domains (both around 1%).
They even identified specific ways online text has changed, “comparing the internet of today to a snapshot from 2023.”

I think it’s missing some nuance

By Krishnoid • Score: 5, Funny Thread
It’s always easy to glibly jump to conclusions in any area. But if we delve into these assertions, it’s not just artificial intelligence, it’s the interface’s comfort and familiarity — as we see it match, soothe, and calm our cognition even as it begins the slippery slope to supplant it.

It’s not the interplay between the decrease in literacy in high school and college and artificial intelligence’s improvement in text generation, it’s a testament to the complexity of the problem — being critical to delve into the cognitive, cultural, and other foundations of human language and thought — in addition to examining not just the production, but also the consumption of language by both the human brain and large language models.

Re: no surprise

By Z00L00K • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

And the last 15 years the corporate web pages have been dumbed down to irrelevancy so you can’t find any useful info anymore.

is this really news?

By fluffernutter • Score: 5, Funny Thread
I don’t see why this is shocking news. HTML is 90s technology and then they added on CSS and JavaScript. It is painful to work with. And typing a lot of words is what AI is good at.

it’s coming from both directions

By argStyopa • Score: 4, Funny Thread

On the one hand, ai is indeed getting better at writing banal fluff pieces that fill the Internet.

On the other, human writing is growing so awful in both subject and quality (this morning’s bbc contains an article where one of their interns sprightly explains she’s been able to train her self to wake without an alarm clock, golly!) that little of value is being supplanted.

Hell, I expect an ai editor of slashdot would post fewer dupes and likely be better at summarizing the point rather than cnp’ing whole 1000-word articles for the front page.

Re: I think it’s missing some nuance

By swillden • Score: 4, Funny Thread
You missed a few. It’s “worth being precise about” something that is “load-bearing”. Don’t forget to sharpen a distinction, too.

Could Mecha Comet’s Linux PC-Phone Hybrid Be the Future of Linux Smartphones?

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
3,346 backers pledged $1,198,844 on Kickstarter to build the (modular) handheld Linux computer, the Mecha Comet. It’s slightly bigger and heavier than your smartphone, with a 4-inch AMOLED display and loaded up with things like microphones, speakers, a SIM tray, two USB ports and a mini HDMI port. There’s three separate kill switches for wifi, microphone and camera — plus a “boot mode” switch for the SD card, and even three pins for instant access to its debug console.

It’s now expected to ship in October or November (and is still available for preorder).

Snap-in extensions include a keyboard (with programmable colors for its backlit keys), a gamepad, and a special IO Breakout that exposes the 40 pogo pins for modules, sensors, and MCUs. They’re all open hardware, and founder Shoaib Merchant says “I’m looking forward to more community designs over the upcoming months.” He shows the screen in action in a video on Kickstarter, demonstrating native apps like Music, Notes, Settings, and Files — as well as a Terminal app running on its color screen.

A Linux correspondent at How-To Geek notes its ships “with a custom, hardware-optimized Linux distro out of the box,” so “it’s like having a dedicated Linux terminal in your pocket.” And they argue the new device “could be the future of Linux smartphones.”
I should also mention that you don’t necessarily have to use the battery; it can power on over USB PD without one. Overall, you’re getting the same I/O you’d expect from a computer in a smartphone-like form factor, complete with modular input devices — and it’s running Linux under the hood. For me, that’s the most innovative gadget I’ve seen in the Linux hardware space in a long time…

It’s powerful enough to run most Linux terminal apps, which opens up a lot of possibilities. You’re also getting an NPU built right into the SoC, which opens up the possibility for on-device AI workflows — something not possible in budget smartphones. Now, I personally plan to use it for SSHing into my main computer and home lab and operating them remotely. That’s also why I’ll be putting the LTE modem in the M.2 slot rather than an SSD — mobile data means I can reach my machines even when there’s no Wi-Fi around.

I also showed it to my partner, and she sees this as the ideal minimalist phone for digital detoxing. There’s a built-in media player, a basic notes app, and you can even run Spotify from the terminal if you want.

Super neat, alas not a solution to the issue

By T34L • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

I really fuckin’ wanna ditch my spying, anticonsumerist, battery chugging and generally only increasingly infuriating android phone for a device actually at least vaguely under my control but few of the things that I have to use a phone for are doable on the Linux thing!

I need the stupid banking app, the stupid work auth app, the stupid state legal filing app, and the stupid carsharing app. They all suck shit, but provide access to services that are either unavailable or considerably less accessible without a “phone” (actually, a comprehensive advertising and surveillance platform under direct control of either Google or Apple).

For this linux thingus to actually replace the function of a modern phone, all those services would have to be accessible through it, but the current “industrial” zeitgeist makes them all only less and less accessible unless you essentially strip down and stick their favored personal privacy probe right up your ass.

Right now it feels way more plausible to get the cheapest Android phone “certified” to interface with the services, keep it off and wrapped in tinfoil unless needed, and when you have that, the device you actually want to use for your actual computer/communicator purposes might as well be of dimensions of a small laptop too, because you’ve already been forced to own a “telephone” anyway. Now, if we backed out of this monopoly-of-trust nightmare that is the backend google/apple services create, I’d get something like the thing in the OP in a heartbeat.

The Global Race To Make a Practical Quantum Computer Just Took a Big Leap Forward

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
It’s “radically different from other quantum computers” reports Phys.org. The Helios system uses trapped ions — charged atoms suspended in free space using electromagnetic fields.

But it operates with 98 qubits — making it the largest trapped-ion quantum computer built so far.
Quantinuum, the company behind the device, is based in Cambridge, U.K., and Broomfield, Colorado. It demonstrated earlier machines operating on 32 qubits in 2023 and 56 qubits in 2025…

It relies on two major advances — one in hardware and one in software. First, the four-way X junction lets the system handle several tasks at once rather than one at a time, which is much faster. That was impossible in earlier QCCD [quantum charge-coupled device] machines, which could only move data back and forth in a single line or loop. Second, judicious use of the freedom offered by the two dimensions of the X junction relies on new classical control software called Helios runtime, which plans the smartest, fastest route for moving and processing the data. Together, these represent a substantial advance in the engineering of quantum computers.

An important consequence is that Helios can perform computations that cannot be performed even on the largest supercomputers using known methods within reasonable amounts of time and power consumption. This demonstrates the ability of this device and its successors to surpass the computational prowess of classical computers — although their algorithms and hardware are rapidly advancing, too. Having said that, Helios’ computations have just been random benchmark tests, so the practical importance of this leap forward is still limited. To perform quantum computations of practical importance in science and commerce, even the most optimistic estimates suggest that quantum computers must be enormously bigger and better — of the order of a million qubits.

Helios drives a big leap forward in quantum

By 93 Escort Wagon • Score: 3 Thread

… according to Quantinuum, the company that makes Helios. But realistically, it’s basically just a different approach to constructing quantum computers that may or may not end up having some practical benefit over other approaches to constructing quantum computers.

Really, the most important part is at the tail end of TFS, although it’s not actually saying anything that we weren’t already aware of:

Having said that, Helios’ computations have just been random benchmark tests, so the practical importance of this leap forward is still limited. To perform quantum computations of practical importance in science and commerce, even the most optimistic estimates suggest that quantum computers must be enormously bigger and better — of the order of a million qubits.

Re:Is Scott Aaronson eating humble pie yet?

By JoshuaZ • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
I have not had time to look at the Helion claims in detail, but I’m not sure why you think Aaronson should do so. His position a few years ago was that many current claims about practical quantum computing were being exaggerated (including very much the claims by D-Wave with their quantum annealing systems) but that in the near future practical quantum computers were likely. Aaronson has been careful to say that even as he’s also been one of the people most vocal in arguing that the burden of proof is on skeptics of quantum computers who would claim it would never be possible. It may help to look at Aaronson’s recent post, for example what he says here https://scottaaronson.blog/?p=9979.

Re:120 years.

By gweihir • Score: 4, Funny Thread

The shoddy quality of the work does reflect the rushed schedule, doesn’t it though?

Twitch And Amazon Hit With Lawsuit for Training AI With Streamers’ Content

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
A class action filed this week accused Amazon’s Twitch gaming service of using video streams to fuel its AI products without licensing or obtaining permission, reports Engadget:
Earlier this month, Twitch Support posted on X that it added an option to opt out of “having your channel content used to train generative AI content models across Amazon.” Shortly after, Twitch hosted an episode of its recurring Patch Notes stream where Mike Minton, the company’s chief product officer, said “if it was opt-in, nobody would opt in,” when asked by a viewer why the Twitch settings for AI training aren’t opt-in but instead enabled by default, requiring users to opt out if they don’t want to participate. Now, the latest class action lawsuit claims that Twitch and Amazon committed a breach of contract when the companies decided to use its streamers as “free training stock for separate commercial AI products.”

Did the read the TOS?

By sarren1901 • Score: 3 Thread

Something tells me that if you post something to those video channels, they already get a ton of rights to the content itself. Maybe these content creators thought it was just free hosting? Seems naive.

UBI

By backslashdot • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

UBI is like reparations from the robots and AI.

Re: Did the read the TOS?

By Z00L00K • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Opt-out alternative instead of opt-in is illegal in some places.

Did they read the rules?

By Valgrus Thunderaxe • Score: 3, Insightful Thread
All these plaintiffs agreed anything they upload belong to Amazon. Now they have buyer’s remorse.

Licenses are not ownership.

By Looce • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Belong? No. Twitch (Amazon) gets a license to the content. Here’s what they think gives them the right to do this:

(i) Unless otherwise agreed to in a written agreement between you and Twitch that was signed by an authorized representative of Twitch, if you submit, transmit, display, perform, post, or store User Content using the Twitch Services, you grant Twitch and its sub-licensees, to the furthest extent and for the maximum duration permitted by applicable law (including in perpetuity if permitted under applicable law), an unrestricted, worldwide, irrevocable, fully sub-licenseable, nonexclusive, and royalty-free right to: (a) use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, and display your User Content (including without limitation for promoting and redistributing part or all of the Twitch Services (and derivative works thereof)) in any form, format, media, or media channels now known or later developed or discovered; and (b) use the name, identity, likeness, and voice (or other biographical information) that you submit in connection with such User Content. Twitch can exercise these rights in connection with Twitch and/or its affiliates’ business. (source)

But the content is not theirs to do with as they please. It still belongs to Twitch streamers. Twitch needs a license to their content so they can transcode it to all the resolutions they support on the fly (a derivative work) and display/perform it on the viewers’ computers. That’s fair. But training models is not connected with the usual business of Twitch, which consists of sending the streams to viewers, providing the chat on which they interact with the streamer and other things they might call the Twitch “experience”. It’s the same thing book publishers are fighting in the courts against LLM companies: can Twitch (Amazon) do this if all they have is a license and don’t own the content?

By their own admission, they had to force everyone to opt in because nobody would have if they didn’t force it. That includes streamers who have since become incapacitated or died and can’t exercise their right to opt out.

It’s also unclear whether people’s content will be erased from the model when they opt out, in a future training iteration, or at all.

This is not legal advice.

OpenAI Faces Safety Scrutiny After Introducing ‘ChatGPT For Teens’

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
This week OpenAI launched a version of ChatGPT exclusively designed for teenagers between the ages of 13 and 17, reports CTV, “saying this version came with stronger protections around content related to mentions of suicide, self-harm and romantic or sexual chats.”
[Tech analyst Carmi Levy says] “What it’s doing is it’s using cues, it’s sort of watching how you’re using the tool, and it’s trying to guess your age.” Levy said if ChatGPT thinks a person has lied about their age when they first signed up, it will automatically put them into the Teens mode for protection. “It includes those sort of two things: prevent you from having experiences that are age inappropriate, and also add features that are aligned with academics, so that makes it easier to study, makes it less likely for you to cheat on an assignment, provide resources that that that allow you to learn more effectively,” he said.

Levy reminded users that this is still an application and a web service, which means it’s constantly collecting personal information about the users’ activities on the device and using the data to estimate their age… In the event a user is talking about self-harm, this new version will block the conversation and suggest additional help or call emergency or mental health services, Levy explained. It would do the same with violent content, eating disorders, engaging in dangerous activities, as well as explicit, sexual or graphic content. “It’s using AI again to sort of parse out that conversation: ‘are we headed in a in a significant direction? If so, throw up that guardrail, stop it from happening, redirect.’"

However, the tech analyst said a number of people who have attempted to bypass the guiderails for research have succeeded in doing so “with a little bit of prompting.... I wouldn’t call it 100% safe. That’s kind of the catch-22 of the entire AI industry.” This will lead parents to think that their children are safer and reduce the oversight on their online activities, which Levy described as a “perverse impact” that is “problematic.”

“Parents should not assume that OpenAI has their kids’ best interests at heart. They should also not assume that these technologies are perfect. They will miss certain things, and they will also engage in what we call false positives,” he said. “An adult who’s legitimately is in the platform might be tagged as a child because the AI simply got it wrong.”
OpenAI’s blog post says the new mode was designed for “preserving the ability to learn, create, and explore.”

But CNN notes the move "comes as OpenAI faces a string of lawsuits alleging that inappropriate conversations with ChatGPT contributed to the harm or deaths of young people.”
[New tools] include nudges for teen users to take a break if they’ve been active for 90 minutes within a three-hour window. OpenAI is also adding options for teens or parents to set “Quiet Hours” when ChatGPT is unavailable or “Study Hours” where ChatGPT’s study mode for learning will be on by default. The company also said it has improved protections to prevent ChatGPT from expressing personal feelings toward a user. And it’s adding reminders that caution teens to think twice if they try to upload a private or sensitive image to the chatbot…

Nearly a third of American teens use AI chatbots daily, a Pew Research Center study published in December found. ChatGPT was by far the most popular AI chatbot in the survey, with more than half of those teens reporting having used it.
Engadget shared this observation from Josh Golin, the executive director of Fairplay, a non-profit advocating for policies to make the internet safer for children. “Most parents, overwhelmingly, do not avail themselves of [parental oversight] tools, in part because they are deliberately made hard to find and use.” Golin’s group wanted to see testing of the tools first to see whether they led to better outcomes for teenagers. “The way this was just announced feels more like a response aimed at public relations than actual deep thinking about what kind of support [teens] need.”

And Mashable got a similar quote from Robbie Torney, head of AI/digital assessments for Common Sense Media’s Youth AI Safety Institute. OpenAI’s teen experience makes important safety commitments, but "What we really need now is evidence that they work, and we need this evidence, including our testing and the testing of others, before anyone, including parents, puts real trust in ChatGPT for Teens.”
Importantly, Torney said parents shouldn’t assume their child is using ChatGPT for Teens. While OpenAI uses age estimation to place users in the age-appropriate version of ChatGPT, it can still mistake a user as older. Parents can be sure their child is using the teen version by linking their ChatGPT account to their child’s and implementing OpenAI’s parental control features. If a teen has previously lied about their age — and plenty do — they may continue to access the adult version of ChatGPT…

Torney said caregivers must enact parental controls to receive notifications from OpenAI should their teen discuss suicide, self-harm, or acts of violence in immediate or dangerous ways… An OpenAI spokesperson said every notification is reviewed by a trained human before it’s sent. The company strives to review notifications in under one hour.

kids vs the world

By spaceman375 • Score: 3 Thread

When you put up a roadblock, teens will take it as a challenge to get around, even if they would otherwise never have pursued the goal of whatever is beyond the restriction. And teens are very creative; they will break these guardrails in so many ways. It’ll be a black-hat/white-hat back and forth for awhile. We’ll all learn something, I would hope, without too many casualties along the way.

Iran-linked Cyberattackers Shut Down a UK Power Plant for Four Days

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“Iran shut down a British power plant for four days in an unprecedented cyber attack,” reports the Telegraph.

More details from the BBC:
The government said that at no point was there a risk to the UK’s energy system, but the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero (DESNZ) has contacted power companies to advise them about the risk of cyber attacks… DESNZ said the incident had affected a small-scale generator and at no point had there been a risk to the wider energy system. The UK’s power network has a number of smaller gas generators which provide short-term power when needed.
Thanks to Alain Williams (Slashdot reader #2,972) for sharing the news.

Suuuure

By liqu1d • Score: 3 Thread
“at no point was there a risk to the UK’s energy system” - what other than a plant being taken offline by a “hostile nation”. No risk at all…

Re: Suuuure

By raburton • Score: 4, Informative Thread

One small scale generator does not a system make.

This reads like fake news

By alexhs • Score: 5, Informative Thread

This seems to be propaganda : There’s absolutely no independent source, this seems to originate from some gossip by an official in UK’s government, sourcing it to the NCSC (a branch of GCHQ), who in turn declined to comment.
The Telegraph heavily uses “it is understood that…” which hints that they were giving very vague information that they’re in no way able to confirm.
Also, about Slashdot’s summary: there’s no more details from the BBC, they’re basically pointing to The Telegraph’s article.

Good, it will help reveal exploits …

By drnb • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Iran shut down a British power plant for four days in an unprecedented cyber attack

Good, it will help reveal exploits sooner rather than later. Better now than in a more serious conflict involving Russia or China.

Take critical infrastructure off the net.

By couchslug • Score: 3 Thread

Wanting total internet connectivity is a sign of utter ignorance, and that ignorance is a choice.

Make ignorance shameful again.

Slovakia Finds Russian Backdoor In Traffic Speed Cameras

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Slovakia acquired speed cameras to modernize its traffic control— but there was a surprise. Tom’s Hardware cites this story from the Risky Bulletin Newsletter:
Unfortunately, the country’s national security service, the NBU, has discovered that the cameras have multiple security issues. Firstly, they have SMS-activated Russian backdoors. Secondly, live camera feeds can be accessed by anyone with the device IP, no password necessary…

[The cameras] are thought to be rebranded Russian CORDON PRO.M traffic cameras, produced by a St. Petersburg-based firm called Semicon… reportedly bought via a Cyprus-based shell company with fake certifications. Reports also suggest that pressure from the opposition political party in Slovakia led to the NBU investigations… Probably most seriously, in terms of national security, these cameras contain a hardcoded list of Russian phone numbers, which can be used to open a backdoor. An SMS from one of these numbers can open shell and network access… [T]he SecureBoot feature is ineffective, and the web management portal can be accessed, exposing live streams, by anyone with the camera IP.

Cameras that have been installed and set up have since been deactivated by the Slovak Ministry of the Interior. Meanwhile, for due diligence, an independent auditor will be called in to confirm the NBU’s findings. It is thought that Croatia, and some other countries in Eastern Europe, may have undiscovered issues with traffic control cameras of similar origin.

Modernize

By 0123456 • Score: 3 Thread

Why is it that “modernize” always seems to mean “do more to turn humans into bug-men”?

Re:Firewall?

By drinkypoo • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Would a properly installed firewall stop someone from accessing this via the IP?

The short answer is yes, but the longer answer is it’s complicated.

Devices with back doors may also dial out from your network. It’s common for devices to phone home to check for updates and such so such activity is not necessarily even seen as suspicious, though of course in an enterprise context you should be disabling automatic updates and/or reconfiguring them to use internal servers.

Devices which might be malicious should be segregated onto their own physically isolated networks connected only through firewalls with policies for both ingress and egress so that you can control both types of threat. But it’s better still when your software and firmware is OSS, and you build your own images and deploy them to the hardware yourself to have the best chance to avoid the possibility in the first place. Even this doesn’t completely preclude such attacks, but it does offer some protection (mostly in proportion to the level at which you’re auditing the source files, and the percentage of OSS.)

TL;DR: It’s smartest to segregate and whitelist traffic in both directions for sketchy devices.

Proper use v revenue raising use

By Bruce66423 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Given the vast numbers killed on the roads in the West, especially in the USA, and the clear evidence that slower cars do less damage in accidents, there is a good case for installing them aggressively. Near where I live a freeway comes to a sudden pedestrian crossing as it enters the suburbs of my city - and enforcing slower speeds in the approach to that crossing is clearly worthwhile. By contrast there is sometimes a camera on the way OUT of the city, beyond the crossing - where there is no further stops - and that makes no sense.

Re:Kremlin surveillance

By 93 Escort Wagon • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Nonsense. This backdoor was obviously put into place so Russian tanks could disable the cameras and speed through the cities, traversing Slovakia quickly on their way to the west. But, now that it’s been discovered, those tanks will need to obey the traffic laws - foiling any invasion!

Stanford Economist Now Believes an AI Job Apocalypse Is Unlikely

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“There is still no sign of economy-wide job destruction,” says economist Erik Brynjolfsson. Working with researchers at the Stanford Digital Economy Lab, Brynjolfsson has determined an AI “job apocalypse” is unlikely, reports the Washington Post, “even though it will likely impact entry-level jobs.”

And Brynjolfsson “predicts that demand for experienced workers such as senior coders will still be high even if AI takes on more routine knowledge and coding work in the future.”
Earlier this month, Brynjolfsson and his colleagues at the Stanford Digital Economy Lab updated their widely publicized report, "Canaries in the Coal Mine? Six Facts about the Recent Employment Effects of Artificial Intelligence,” to reflect that they do not see widespread, economy-wide job displacement associated with AI…

Brynjolfsson: What has moved on the upside is productivity. Nonfarm business productivity growth is running over 2 percent, the best sustained stretch since the late-1990s boom… The gains show up years after the investment, and they’re starting to show up… By 2030, we will have enormously more capable AI, meaningfully faster productivity growth and an unemployment rate that looks unremarkable — somewhere in its historical range. That surprises people, but it’s what the mechanism implies… [T]he technology is becoming much more powerful, and it’s going to be even more powerful.

Secondly, there are huge implications for business and the economy, including some increases in living standards, but also, potentially, job disruption. And then, thirdly, we must act now to address this gap. We can’t just sit back and wait for the tsunami to hit us. And one of the things we can do is put in place institutions, policies and research to make the technology more complementary — using AI to complement people so it creates more jobs. A common misconception among business managers is AI, in order to be effective, has to reduce jobs. That’s just not true. You can use AI to increase employment and productivity at the same time. It’s kind of a win-win…

Right now, tax policy is very skewed toward favoring capital versus labor — and, as a consequence, a lot of entrepreneurs and managers, they’re basically being guided by the federal government to replace workers with machines. And I don’t think that’s necessarily what we’d like to have happen. From an economist’s perspective, what you want to be doing is not mimicking and replacing things. You want to be extending and complementing — have humans do new things they never could have done before.
He acknowledges “real, persistent and widening” effects on entry-level jobs, with a labor market "closing the on-ramp for people starting their careers… If companies don’t hire people at the base of the pyramid, then they’re not going to have those people later when they need them.”

One he points out that one company is instead using AI to speed up its training of young employees.

Death of Expertise

By irreverentdiscourse • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The apocalypse isn’t job replacement, it’s job training. ALL of the entry level jobs in most industries are going to be replaced by AI, and there will be no jobs available to train up the next set of tier 2 and 3 employees. The apprenticeship model that most of the world relies on is going to collapse. It will take a decade to realize the losses and by then it will be too late to train replacements.

Where do Senior Developers come from? Thin air?

By JimMcc • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I keep reading that AI will be replacing junior positions and that senior positions will still be in demand. Where will the next generation of senior developers come from? How will the develop their skills if AI is removing the junior roles?

Re: Death of Expertise

By ambrandt12 • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Except if you lower the entry-point to get to Lvl 2 while getting rid of Lvl 1, then you get total morons who wouldn’t even be considered for Lvl 1 doing Lvl 2 work… so, what did all that accomplish?

Higher labor demand? What labor? There’s less and less actual labor (y’know… us blue-collar workers) regular jobs and more and more office jobs for those who have the fancy piece of paper.
How do you increase demand for labor when manufacturers are looking to have less meatsacks around by AI-enabled automating away more and more jobs and having more jobs done by one person? Of course, us blue-collars could go get us some of that edumacation, but not many of us have $200k sitting around, don’t qualify for scholarships, can’t afford to have another loan (the ones for the house and ten-year old truck dun used up muh credit), and don’t have the time while working our lower-paying jobs and providing for the family of lil’ uns’.

irreverentdiscourse and Sethra both have it right.

Biased news from the start

By will4 • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

> Erik Brynjolfsson. Working with researchers at the Stanford Digital Economy Lab

A “news” article, supposedly unbiased, quoting an expert who works with the people whose job it is to research, get paid for, and promote AI technology.

A major newspaper should know better than to quote a person who profits from AI about whether or not AI is good for regular people’s job prospects.

And take into consideration that the Washington Post is owned by something which sells AI based cloud services.

Re:Death of Expertise

By snowshovelboy • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Its already too late. New grads used AI to cheat on their homework, so they aren’t qualified for entry level positions anyway.

23 Years After SimCity 4’s Release, ‘Eternal Commuter’ Bug Finally Fixed

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“It began life just a year after SimCity 4’s 2003 launch,” writes the blog PCGamesN. “Now, over 20 years later, it’s still going strong with the arrival of Network Addon Mod update 50.”
The SimCity 4 Network Addon Mod, or simply ‘NAM’ among the community, has long been a de facto recommendation to anyone looking to pick up the classic city builder. It’s a comprehensive overhaul to the game’s transportation and infrastructure networks that combines key fixes with a vast set of additional build pieces such as overpasses, intersections, on-ramps, roundabouts, and so on.... [Y]ou’ll be able to place down elements adjacent to one another that might previously have needed a one-tile gap between them. Streets can be dragged diagonally, slope tolerances have been improved, and you can build tunnels with the street network.

The new version also includes a fix for the ‘Eternal Commuter Loop’ bug, which might sound fairly innocuous if you’re not deep in the weeds. In actuality, it’s a 23-year-long frustration that has plagued modders ever since launch. Essentially, it’s a problem with the regional pathfinding across city boundaries in certain layouts, causing your Sims to bounce from location to location in search of work without actually taking up a job in any of them. Your zone demand is ruined, traffic builds to unsustainable levels, and the economy falls to pieces before your very eyes. Until now, the only real solution was to simply avoid building layouts that gave your commuters the chance to loop between locations. Now, by blocking specific neighbor-to-neighbor routes while allowing the rest to run as normal, the problem has been resolved…

Equally impressively, the mandatory implementation of the DLL has reduced the size of the NAM codebase “by almost 90% and by more than ten million lines, making it easier to maintain and reducing the chance of bugs.”
Thanks to long-time Slashdot reader Striek for sharing the news.

Canonical is Funding a PhD to Automate C to Rust Translation

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader shared this report from the blog It’s FOSS:
Canonical has committed funding to a three-year PhD project focused on building a system that can automatically translate large C codebases into Rust. And they are not alone; UK Research and Innovation is matching their funding for the project, which is set to run through the University of Bristol’s Programming Languages Research Group.

The PhD is aiming to build an all-encompassing platform that can take a C repository running into hundreds of thousands of lines and translate it into Rust that’s "safe, behaviourally correct and maintainable Rust.”

The work will be carried out by a student, Alex Wood, who will be supported by Professor Meng Wang leading the work, with Dr. Cristina David and Canonical’s Jon Seager serving as co-supervisors.

How is that even possible?

By dskoll • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

If the C code does something unsafe, how can it be machine-translated into safe Rust, without knowing the intention of the programmer?

And even is this is possible, what’s the point? Why not just make a C compiler that emits “safe” assembler directly? It’s not as if a transpiler is likely to emit human-maintainable code.

I know Canonical is all hot for Rust, but this particular project doesn’t seem feasible to me.

Re:don’t get it

By haruchai • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Why not just use the time to make a safe c library of operations and use it?

make sense to me but almost 20 years after someone began the Safe C library it’s still a work in progress?
https://jacobfilipp.com/DrDobb…

Re: Oh, now I get it.

By reg • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Because the point of Rust is that it’s safe by design. In other words, once you’ve figured out how to structure your program to make it not do unsafe things, you have a design you can just implement in C and (as long as it’s a faithful implementation), and it will also be guaranteed to be safe. The only reason not to is that maintenance is harder that way. It also shows that Rust has to many limits because code that is provably safe by a human cannot be written in Rust without a redesign to meet Rust’s more limited understanding of safe.

Re:How is that even possible?

By Mr. Barky • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

My bet is that 99% of C code is easily translatable and doesn’t need to do anything unsafe (it may use unsafe methods, but basically in a safe way). If an automatic translator could do that 99% of code and flag the 1% that it cannot handle, that would still be a major time saver in translating it to Rust. This may be a reasonable goal rather than aiming at 100%.

Re:How is that even possible?

By gweihir • Score: 4, Funny Thread

That is not the point. The point is that new code gets the minor security benefits of Rust and the major benefits that all the mediocre and bad coders will be unable to learn Rust. Hence when you hire for a Rust job, you get a much better selection of candidates.

Supply Chain Issues Delaying US Grid Batteries’ Installation

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot
Falling prices have made grid-scale storage batteries more attractive, reports Bloomberg. But after decades of stagnant investment, America’s grids “are racing to make the upgrades needed to plug them in,” with supplies straining for the necessary equipment.
Demand for batteries has skyrocketed as electricity use across the U.S. swells, driven by data centers’ booming energy needs and increasing electrification. It’s also getting harder to get them connected to power grids… As those upgrades get delayed, storage projects are piling up in interconnection queues from coast to coast. For example, Consolidated Edison Inc., a major utility in New York state, says over the last two years the volume of battery storage projects waiting to be connected has grown by 300%… “The whole process of interconnecting these new power plants got really log-jammed and bottlenecked,” said Joseph Rand, an energy policy researcher at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory…

Nationwide, some 750 gigawatts of energy storage projects — roughly equivalent to the generating capacity of more than 700 nuclear reactors — are in line to get grid connections, according to the lab’s research. Not all of these projects will get built. Many developers already abandoned the queue because of delays. Still, the waiting time is increasing; the median was five years in 2025, up from a year and a half in 2015. The flood of battery projects is expected to continue. Wood Mackenzie, an energy consultancy, projects the U.S. energy storage market will quadruple in the next six years…

[Shortages in key equipment] have driven up construction costs and time lines for grid upgrades, leaving utilities struggling to build fast enough. A drought of skilled workers is further slowing them down… In California, PG&E Corp., the state’s largest utility, told regulators in January that a key driver of delays was long lead times for specialized equipment. Procuring certain breakers could take nearly four years, according to the utility, which reported a 300% increase in its interconnection workload compared to prior years. In Northern California, for example, holdups to circuit breaker upgrades to a substation in Solano County led to projected delays for two battery projects worth a combined 450 megawatts. Transmission line work in the Bay Area has put another 800 megawatts of energy storage at risk of delay, according to PG&E.
Last year New York’s Con Ed started requiring developers to help pay for upgrades if their projects will push power demand and strain infrastructure. But that also drew criticism:
According to a survey conducted by the trade group New York Battery and Energy Storage Technology Consortium (NY-BEST), the new methodology raised costs by an average of $21 million per project, a 14-fold increase. At least 25 projects have been canceled as a result, according to the group. Battery advocates have appealed to state regulators to get Con Ed to abandon the new policy.
Thanks to Slashdot reader Bruce66423 for sharing the news.

Empty slogans.

By Ostracus • Score: 3 Thread

Just think how much of this alleviated by Made in America being more than a slogan?

Wrong conclusion.

By Gravis Zero • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

A drought of skilled workers is further slowing them down…

Given that we live in a “market-driven” society, the correct conclusion is that companies are refusing to properly compensate skilled workers. As for the cause, the only rational conclusion is that there is insufficient competition in the energy distribution market. To encourage competition, the correct move would be to start breaking up large energy distribution companies like PG&E.

Re:Wrong conclusion.

By ObliviousGnat • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

In a free market, business owners would be free to decide how much land to set aside for parking for their customers, just as restaurant owners decide how many tables and chairs to set out. Right now, parking requirements are set by cities and are “closer to sorcery than to science.”

Let’s do it. Because we all value freedom here, right?

The external costs of oil also need to be priced in if the market is going to make decisions. One example of these costs are the damage to our lungs caused by emissions. We could price in that external cost by adding a fee on top of the price of oil and use the revenue to pay medical costs and lost income to people affected by air pollution. I think that would be fair.

Time dependent demand [Re:Great Scott!]

By Geoffrey.landis • Score: 4, Informative Thread

(TFA): “By storing electricity when prices are low and renewables are abundant, and discharging it when demand rises, batteries can help reduce consumer power bills, decarbonize electricity use and reduce strain on the grid. That makes them especially useful on hot summer days when consumers blast their air conditioners.”

They got that all screwed up… prices are low at night when renewables are definitely not abundant… demand is highest during the day when prices are high _and_ renewables are abundant.

No, it’s partly right. Air conditioning loads tend to peak in the late afternoon, when solar power is still available (but not at its peak), but have another peak when people get home from work, which continues on into the evening and loads typically only drop below average around midnight, when solar is not abundant. Look up “duck curve”> .

This could, in principle, be easily solved— air conditioners could easily store coolness. Water has a high heat capacity, and you could cool water during the solar peak, and use it to cool your living area in the afternoon. Water has low watt-hours per kilogram, but for residential or commercial use, that’s not a big deal. But most of the US doesn’t have time-dependent electricity rates, so there’s no reason for consumers to want this.

They got that all screwed up… prices are low at night when renewables are definitely not abundant…

Absolutely right, if by “renewables” you mean “solar”. If we did have time dependent electrical rates, the cheap power is midnight to 6AM, not the solar peak at all.

But this may change as more and more solar gets emplaced.

Shift storage to consumers

By aaarrrgggh • Score: 3 Thread

These “grid scale” batteries… don’t scale. It is far more effective to push storage to the consumer (especially large consumers) for operation below 35kV, and ideally below 5kV. Otherwise you just end up with a more expensive grid with excess complexity that is difficult to model reliably.