Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. The California Government Is Coming For Your E-Bikes
  2. The Invisible Force Making Food Less Nutritious
  3. Belgium Plans To Nationalize Nuclear Power Plants
  4. Musk Concludes Testimony At OpenAI Trial
  5. US Senators Ban Themselves From Prediction Markets Trading
  6. New Linux ‘Copy Fail’ Vulnerability Enables Root Access On Major Distros
  7. In Real-World Test, an AI Model Did Better Than ER Doctors At Diagnosing Patients
  8. French Prosecutors Link 15-Year-Old To Mega-Breach At State’s Secure Document Agency
  9. World’s Largest Digital Human Rights Conference Suddenly ‘Postponed’
  10. Microsoft Open-Sources ‘Earliest DOS Source Code Discovered To Date’
  11. Convicted Former Harvard Scientist Rebuilds Brain Computer Lab In China
  12. Most Swiss Back Initiative To Cap Population At 10 Million
  13. OpenAI Codex System Prompt Includes Explicit Directive To ‘Never Talk About Goblins’
  14. DOJ Sues Cloudera For Deliberately Excluding American Workers From Tech Jobs
  15. First Tesla Semi Rolls Off High-Volume Production Line

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

The California Government Is Coming For Your E-Bikes

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from the San Francisco Standard:
If state lawmakers have their way, you’ll have to get a license plate for your e-bike, and if you’re planning to buy one next year, it’ll be slower. Amid growing concerns about e-bike safety, particularly among children in Bay Area suburbs, two bills introduced this year aim to make it easier to ticket riders and reduce the top speed of some models. AB 1942 would require certain e-bikes to be registered with the Department of Motor Vehicles and display license plates, and AB 1557 would slow e-bikes that children are allowed to operate. Both bills are still being reviewed in committee. If either bill passes this year, it will take effect Jan. 1.

The Invisible Force Making Food Less Nutritious

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
fjo3 shares a report from the Washington Post:
Surging concentrations of carbon in the atmosphere, caused largely by burning fossil fuels, have produced potent changes in the way plants grow — from increasing their sugar content to depleting essential nutrients like zinc. Experts fear the degradation of Earth’s food supply will cause an epidemic of hidden hunger, in which even people who consume enough calories won’t get the nutrients they need to thrive. “The diets we eat today have less nutritional density than what our grandparents ate, even if we eat exactly the same thing,” said Kristie Ebi, a professor at the University of Washington’s Center for Health and the Global Environment.

People in wealthy countries with strong health care systems will have many tools to cope with the change, experts said. But for the world’s poorest and most vulnerable, the consequences could be devastating. One study concluded that by the middle of the century the phenomenon could put more than a billion additional women and children at risk of iron-deficiency anemia — a condition that can cause pregnancy complications, developmental problems and even death. Meanwhile, some 2 billion people across the globe who already suffer from some form of nutrient shortage could see their health problems grow even worse. “The scale of the problem is huge,” Ebi said.

Plants depend on carbon dioxide to perform photosynthesis — but that doesn’t mean they grow better when there’s more carbon in the air, scientists say. A sweeping survey of changes among 32 compounds in 43 crops found that nearly every plant that humans eat is harmed by rising CO2 levels. […] For the past several years, [Sterre F. ter Haar, an environmental scientist at Leiden University in the Netherlands and lead author of the survey] and her colleagues have worked to compile a database of all existing research on nutrient changes linked to rising CO2. They tracked down hundreds of studies, ranging from tightly controlled lab experiments to sprawling global analyses of real-world crops.

Next the team used their dataset to calculate the nutritional densities of each crop under different carbon dioxide levels — and to predict how their composition could continue to shift in the future. On average, they found, nutrients have already decreased by an average 3.2 percent across all plants since the late 1980s, when the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere was about 350 parts per million. That figure may seem small, ter Haar said, but with so much of the world already living on the brink of nutrient insufficiency, a drop of just a few percentage points has the potential to push millions of additional people into a health crisis.
Researchers are still trying to understand the exact causes of this change. Extra CO2 can make plants grow faster and produce more carbohydrates, but without a matching increase in mineral uptake, nutrients like zinc, iron, and protein become diluted. Higher CO2 also causes plants to open their leaf pores less often, reducing the amount of water — and dissolved minerals — they absorb through their roots. At the same time, higher temperatures can further disrupt soil chemistry, affecting how plants take up nutrients and, in some cases, increasing their absorption of harmful substances like arsenic.

Of all the possible reasons why some are starving

By ffkom • Score: 3, Insightful Thread
… this will remain among the least relevant, even if found to be true. People are starving because of wars, because of corrupt politics and, much less often, because of natural disasters. And if we want to know why nutrients appear somewhat “diluted” in foods marketed today… there is obviously a commercial incentive to grow the largest mass of of food in the shortest time with the least resources, and you only have to taste a strawberry or tomato from your own garden in comparison to the output-optimized versions you can buy at the supermarket to know where “dilution” primarily comes from.

No problem.

By Petersko • Score: 3 Thread

If we figure out we’re missing something important, we can just get our government to put it in our toothpaste. That shouldn’t bother anybody..

Re:This is misdirection

By serafean • Score: 4, Informative Thread

People have been working on identifying this problem for 3 decades.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m…
https://elifesciences.org/arti…
https://www.politico.com/agend…

Yes, our fields are basically growing hydroponics now, but even when grown in healthy soils, you’ll grow junkier food than a century ago. Both are a problem, it compounds into mass silent malnutrition.

Belgium Plans To Nationalize Nuclear Power Plants

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Belgium plans to buy its seven aging nuclear reactors from French power giant Engie in a “full takeover” aimed at securing domestic energy supplies, extending reactor operations, and developing new nuclear capacity. “The move would also mean suspending plans to decommission nuclear operations in Belgium,” reports the BBC. From the report:
The move would reverse the phase-out of nuclear energy legislation approved in the early 2000s amid safety concerns prohibiting the building of new nuclear power plants and limiting the operating lifetimes of existing ones to 40 years. Only two of Belgium’s seven nuclear reactors are operational - located at plants in Doel and in Tihange - and their operating licenses were recently extended until 2035. The other five reactors were shut between 2022 and 2025 and plans to dismantle them will now be suspended.

Engie and the government said they aim to reach an agreement on the takeover of the nuclear stations by October 1st. In a joint statement with Engie, the Belgian government said the move also highlights its aim to extend operations of existing nuclear reactors and to develop “new nuclear capacity” in Belgium. “By doing so, the Belgian Government is taking responsibility for Belgium’s long-term energy future, with the objective of building a financially and economically viable activity that supports security of supply, climate objectives, industrial resilience and socio-economic prosperity,” the statement adds.

Tihange is dangerous

By pahles • Score: 4 Thread
I live relatively close to the Tihange plant (the plant is in Belgium, I live in the Netherlands). The reactor regularly automatically shuts down due to several issues. The concrete containment buildings are full of cracks, they are falling apart due to concrete degradation. Of one of those buildings the building plans have vanished.

Some years ago the Dutch government distributed iodine pills for everyone under the age of 18 who lives in a certain radius of the plant. The plant is old and should be shut down.

Precarious legal environment

By dna_(c)(tm)(r) • Score: 3 Thread
One aspect is that there is a law in place that forbids exploitation and requires decommissioning. The current government wants to take back into production 2 phased-out NPPs and keep 6 others in service. Engie probably sees a very politicized and volatile exploitation and investment environment. Still nationalised industry is not a good idea, I think.

Re: happy

By bramez • Score: 4, Informative Thread

As a Belgian, I am not that happy about the idea of re-nationalizing TGEM with Engie.
The nuclear provisions fund (via Synatom) was supposed to cover decommissioning and waste. It was built up during decades when the plants were still public and nit profitable. But a big part of that money was lent back to Electrabel, which then could generate profits on it and pay dividends to Engie shareholders.
So profits where privatized, and now the longterm risks become public again. Restarting these plants will take additional billions in public money. And it is only needed during wintertime, in the summerthere is overcapacity because of renewables. So the nuclear sites will never be profitable again, and less and less so.

Re: happy

By aaarrrgggh • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

I think the idea of power plants being “profitable” is part of the problem. Collectively Europe needs more winter generating capacity, preferably not reliant on imported energy. Your choices come down to coal or nuclear. If you are using them as low capacity factor sources, either is going to be expensive to run. A potential advantage of existing nuclear plants is that you have a 4-7 month window every year to phase upgrade projects. As upgrade requirements drop you have the potential for low-to-zero cost energy which can stimulate other industries such as vertical farming.

But long term one thing is clear for Europe: importing gas and oil are huge strategic risks that need to be addressed.

Good

By jacks smirking reven • Score: 3 Thread

As the USA has shown the more you privatize your nuclear fleet the worse off it gets. The regulatory environment by necessity has to be so stringent that you effectively create double work and there are just losses and inefficiency everywhere.

When we look at successful and expanding nuclear power in the past decades and right now in the present whats the common thread? State ownership.

France? Famously a state-owned-enterprise.
China? State-owned-enterprise, several of them actually. They have 2 that build plants and others than support them.
India? State-owned-enterprise.

Now is this the answer for all energy? No, renewables like wind and solar have done excellent with private investment because those make sense from an ROI and regulatory standpoint, nuclear just fails on both those standpoints. It takes too much money up front, takes too long to recoup and requires too much regulation to operate safely and it’s failure mode, although quite rare, is simply insane compared to other energy sources. Sure it’s a 0.001% of major problem but that major problem could destroy an entire economic region.

The other advantage of state-owned nuclear is that it is an easy lever for price stabilization in the energy market.

Musk Concludes Testimony At OpenAI Trial

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from CNBC:
Elon Musk wrapped up his testimony on Thursday as the trial in his lawsuit against OpenAI CEO Sam Altman continued into its fourth day. OpenAI’s attorney, William Savitt, cross-examined Musk in the morning. He asked Musk about the capped nature of Microsoft’s investments in OpenAI, his involvement in negotiations about the company’s structure, and whether he knew about the OpenAI nonprofit’s recent initiatives. “I don’t know what’s going on at OpenAI,” Musk testified.

Savitt also asked Musk about his competing artificial intelligence startup, xAI. While not the main focus of the case, Musk said it is “partly” true that xAI used some of OpenAI’s models to train its own models, a process known as distilling. Musk also suggested that xAI has used OpenAI’s technology to help build the company. Musk sued OpenAI, Altman, and Greg Brockman, the company’s president, in 2024, alleging that they went back on their commitments to keep the artificial intelligence company a nonprofit and to follow its charitable mission. He claims that the roughly $38 million he donated to seed OpenAI, a company he co-founded, was used for unauthorized commercial purposes.

Once Musk wrapped up his testimony after roughly two hours of questioning on Thursday, his attorneys called Jared Birchall, who manages Musk’s billions at his family office, as their next witness. Birchall testified about his knowledge of Musk’s specific donations to OpenAI. Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers oversaw the proceedings from federal court in Oakland, California. The trial will resume on Monday.
Recap:
Elon Musk Says OpenAI Betrayed Him, Clashes With Company’s Attorney (Day Three)
Musk Testifies OpenAI Was Created As Nonprofit To Counter Google (Day Two)
Elon Musk and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman Head To Court (Day One)

US Senators Ban Themselves From Prediction Markets Trading

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
The U.S. Senate unanimously passed a rule banning senators from trading on prediction markets effective immediately. CNBC reports:
The move came amid rising concern about insider trading on prediction market platforms such as Kalshi and Polymarket, and about event contracts that can involve death or violence. On April 22, Kalshi said it had suspended and fined one U.S. Senate candidate and two candidates for the House of Representatives for political insider trading on their own campaigns.

Earlier on Thursday, a group of Democratic members of Congress called on the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to issue a rule “that prevents insider trading and corruption in the market and prohibits event contracts on the outcome of elections, war and military actions in the U.S. or abroad, sports, and government actions without a valid economic hedging interest.” Kalshi and Polymarket both praised the Senate’s action.
“I applaud the Senate for passing this resolution to ban Senators and their offices from trading on prediction markets,” Kalshi CEO Tarek Mansour wrote in a post on X. “Kalshi already proactively blocks members of congress and enforces against insider trading. This is a great step to increase trust in our markets by making it an industry standard,” Mansour said. “Now, let’s pass this in the House!”

Polymarket, in its own post on X, said, “We’re in full support of this. Our Rulebook & Terms of Service already prohibit such conduct, but codifying this into law is a step forward for the industry. Happy to help move this forward however we can.”

Pinky Swear!

By Local ID10T • Score: 5, Informative Thread

This is an internal rule not a law.

It is enforceable via self-policing (committee investigates and votes on guilt and recommends penalties to the chamber). Like most rules violations, the penalties are variable (pay a fine? expulsion? somewhere in between?). The Senate Rules Committee can also quietly choose not to renew this rule at any time in the future.

It is a good thing… but don’t read too much into it. It is a gesture.

Re:Pinky Swear!

By algaeman • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
It’s only illegal if you’re a democrat.

Re:Pinky Swear!

By mADneSs • Score: 4, Informative Thread
Also doesn’t appear to ban spouse/family members from placing bets either. And there’s always the ‘friend loophole’. And even after all of that, it’s still open season on insider stock trading.

Re:Pinky Swear!

By 93 Escort Wagon • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Some senators, like Mark Kelly, have been trying to pass a ban on any stock trading by senators at all… but it hasn’t gotten a lot of traction, so many of them don’t want to give up their sweet sweet insider profits.

If you can’t beat ‘em, join ‘em.

By gewalker • Score: 3, Informative Thread

GOP is a mutual fund that tracks the stock profiles of Republicans, NANC tracks the Democrats.
Full discloure, I own just a little of each - I thought it would be interesting. There may well be similar funds - have not looked.

Since Kalsi is subject to US regulators, it is illegal for US citizens to use Kalshi for insider trading. Of course, congress does not necessarily play by the same rules as us peons.

New Linux ‘Copy Fail’ Vulnerability Enables Root Access On Major Distros

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
A newly disclosed Linux kernel flaw dubbed "Copy Fail" can let a local, unprivileged attacker gain root access on major Linux distributions, with researchers claiming the bug affects kernels shipped since 2017. “The POC exploit works out of the box today, but a future version that can escape from containers like Docker is promised soon,” writes Slashdot reader tylerni7. “Technical details are available here.” Slashdot reader BrianFagioli shares a report from NERDS.xyz:
A newly disclosed Linux kernel vulnerability called Copy Fail (CVE-2026-31431) allows an unprivileged user to gain root access using a tiny 732-byte script, and it works with unsettling consistency across major distributions. Unlike older exploits that relied on race conditions or fragile timing, this one is a straight-line logic flaw in the kernel’s crypto subsystem. It abuses AF_ALG sockets and splice to overwrite a few bytes in the page cache of a target file, such as /usr/bin/su. Because the kernel executes from the page cache, not directly from disk, the attacker can inject code into a setuid binary in memory and immediately escalate privileges.

What makes this especially concerning is how quiet it is. The file on disk remains unchanged, so standard integrity checks see nothing wrong, while the in-memory version has already been tampered with. The same primitive can also cross container boundaries since the page cache is shared, raising the stakes for multi-tenant environments and Kubernetes nodes. The underlying issue traces back to an in-place optimization added years ago, now being rolled back as part of the fix. Until patched kernels are widely deployed, this is one of those bugs that feels less like a theoretical risk and more like a practical, reliable path to full system compromise.

Re: Note that this is a local exploit

By dlasley • Score: 5, Funny Thread
My other computer *IS* your computer ;-)

Re:Note that this is a local exploit

By thecombatwombat • Score: 5, Informative Thread

I hate how this reasoning persists. It is just so disconnected from the real world.

So should large organizations just not bother with least privilege and normal users? Everyone might as well be root, if one with bad intentions gets access to a system, well they should be assumed to just be root anyways?

I mean, in a company with even 100 people, if one of their accounts gets compromised, or one of them goes rogue, “you have already messed up” really isn’t the point. I used to run a data ingest system where we gave limited shell accounts to somewhere around 1,000 clients, plenty of similar but much larger systems are out there. No one *at my company* had messed up in any way if one of those accounts went rogue. Tons of systems like that exist, it’s not some edge case.

Re:Note that this is a local exploit

By sg_oneill • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

If an attacker gets this far, you have already messed up. Still should be patched ASAP.

We’ve been in the cloud era 15 years now. Docker hosts, Kubernetes pods, Lambdas, Even old fashion cpanel hosts. All of these are at risk, even if the users are otherwise doing everything right.

Discovered With AI

By snookiex • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
According to the exploit page, it was discovered by an AI-powered product from Xint Code (the ones who supposedly created the exploit). This means several others are rapidly catching up with Mythos (as was to be expected). This could be very good (if software vendors quickly patch their products and make it through the initial wave of reports) or very bad if the deployed systems are not updated (which is the most likely scenario). In any case, I prefer to bite the bullet once and for all and face the tsunami instead of dealing with the uncertainty manipulated by a few tech bros. Either way, this is not going to be nice.

Re: And this is why

By _0x0nyadesu • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Immutable distros still have writable parts of the disk.

typically the setup is /usr or the base OS image: read-only / atomically updated /etc: often writable or layered /var: writable /home: writable /tmp: writable
containers / flatpaks / app data: writable

and then on top of that you’ll still have all of these places where something can put binaries, steal credentials, and hide itself across restarts on your perfect immutable machine /home/ /var/tmp /tmp /var/lib/ /var/cache/ /var/log/
container writable layers
upload directories
SQLite/db files
app config/state
user-level systemd/OpenRC/autostart equivalents
browser/profile dirs
SSH config/keys if permissions allow

and that’s just desktop workstations. on the server side you’ve got whatever http(s) server dejour of the day running threads through whatever fcgi nonsense

and then on a modern corp setup you’ve got people flying around with claude and codex and therefor npm nonsense flying around everywhere and random node binaries in ps aux compiling random shit

Look it helps and most immutable distros are so eccentric no one bothers to try to exploit them for realsies but don’t expect to be safe until you patch your kernel.

In Real-World Test, an AI Model Did Better Than ER Doctors At Diagnosing Patients

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
A new study from Harvard Medical School and Beth Israel Deaconess found that an OpenAI reasoning model outperformed experienced ER doctors at diagnosing and managing patient cases using messy, real-world emergency department records. Researchers say the results don’t support replacing doctors, but they do suggest AI could meaningfully reshape clinical workflows if tested carefully in prospective trials. NPR reports:
The researchers ran a series of experiments on the AI model to test its clinical acumen — including actual cases like the lupus patient who’d been previously treated at the emergency department at Beth Israel in Boston. The team graded how well the AI model could provide an accurate diagnosis at three moments in time, from the triage stage in the ER, up to being admitted into the hospital. Overall, AI outperformed two experienced physicians — and did so with only the electronic health records and the limited information that had been available to the physicians at the time. “This is the big conclusion for me — it works with the messy real-world data of the emergency department, " said Dr. Adam Rodman, a clinical researcher at Beth Israel and one of the study authors. “It works for making diagnoses in the real world.”

Other parts of the study focused on case reports published in the New England Journal of Medicine and clinical vignettes to suss out whether the AI model could meet well-established “benchmarks” and game out thorny diagnostic questions. “The model outperformed our very large physician baseline,” said Raj Manrai, assistant professor of Biomedical Informatics at Harvard Medical School who was also part of the study. The authors emphasize the AI relied on text alone, while in real life, clinicians need to attend to many other inputs like images, sounds and nonverbal cues when diagnosing and treating a patient.
The findings have been published Thursday in the journal Science.

Perfectly understandable.

By couchslug • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Doctors are tired, stressed and multitasking, They diagnose by pattern matching, ideal for AI.

A real world test?

By lucifuge31337 • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
That was in fact not a real world test at all. It was using records to ex-post-facto relitigate decisions. And yes, this is an important step towards something that may be considered for “real world testing” but it’s not that at all.

Doctors

By CAIMLAS • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

In my experience, doctors make some of the worst diagnosticians. They’re the human equivalent of a narrowly trained, highly optimized model: they focus on a very narrow corpus of doctrinal, prescribed medicine (regardless of their subdiscipline). This leads to significant cognitive bias and the tendency to overly generalize. You see this quite a bit with even things as simple as blood work and iron levels: “your iron levels are fine” - meanwhile, ferrin is low, which has a whole slew of symptoms which get passed off as hysteria, particularly with women. There are entire communities of people suffering from low ferrin where they struggled for years getting a proper diagnosis when the tests themselves told the story, had the doctors not been prone to an overly generalized prognosis and ivory tower thinking.

It would make sense that AI would supersede them in capabilities: the corpus is larger and they aren’t as prone to the kind of cognitive problems doctors are, at least to as high a degree.

Re:Another tool in the toolbox.

By HiThere • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

You’re making MUCH too wide an assertion. There are areas where the AI is better, but it’s competence is “jagged”. If you say it’s better at guessing protein folding, I’ll agree. if you say it’s a better surgeon…not this month. Probably not this year. But it’s better in certain specific areas, and those areas are increasing.

Re:Nurse diagnosed them, not the AI

By thegarbz • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

The thing is, it was a trained nurse that noticed these symptoms and WROTE THEM DOWN. And she usually knew exactly what it was, but waited for the doctor to say.

Anyone can diagnose correctly 90% of the time if you have the right information.

Sorry but that is horseshit. There’s a difference between gathering data, analysing data, and making a knowledge based decisions on data. You have no basis to say the nurse knew anything other than a list of symptoms she was trained to record. Diagnosis (in general, even when we’re talking about your car not starting) is a multifaceted approach. No one here was diagnosing anything with the work of all parties. It is true the AI replced the doctor and not the nurse, but your assertion that the doctor was meaningless in this is just a baseless assumption (and a very dangerous one as the knowledge based decision relies on a wide array of knowledge that a typical nurse is not trained to have, and not using all that knowledge can quickly lead to incorrect diagnosis).

There’s a reason we have nurses do nursing jobs, doctors do doctor jobs, and pharmacists do pharmacy jobs. The world is full of examples of people reaching outside their field of training. You can find them by doing a google search along with the words “botched”, “sued”, or “fatal”.

French Prosecutors Link 15-Year-Old To Mega-Breach At State’s Secure Document Agency

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
French prosecutors say police detained a 15-year-old suspected of using the alias “breach3d" in connection with a cyberattack on France Titres (ANTS), the state agency that handles passports, ID cards, and other secure documents. The breach allegedly involved 12 million to 18 million lines of data offered for sale online, potentially affecting up to a third of France’s population if the records are unique. The Register reports:
It formally opened (PDF) a judicial investigation on April 29, covering alleged fraudulent access to a state-run automated data processing system and the extraction of data from it. Each offense carries a potential prison sentence of seven years and a maximum ~$350,000 fine. Public Prosecutor Laure Beccuau has requested that the minor, whose pronouns, like their name, were also not specified, be formally charged and placed under judicial supervision.

[…] France’s approach to punishing minors via its legal system is typically geared toward re-education and rehabilitation rather than prison time. While those aged between 13 and 16 can face time in juvenile detention, it is often used as a last resort measure. The maximum sentences and fines for the charges the 15-year-old in this case faces are upper limits imposed on adult offenders, and would likely be lowered substantially in cases involving a minor, like this one.

No real penalty

By sarren1901 • Score: 3 Thread

So criminal gangs can recruit a 15 year old off the Internet, equip them with the tools for the job and promise them a cut. The 15 yo takes the fall, is slapped on the wrist and the adults that convinced the teen are never even caught. What a great system. How much damage did this kid cause again? Oh well, glad this is France and not USA.

Precisions

By test321 • Score: 3 Thread

Each offense carries a potential prison sentence of seven years and a maximum ~$350,000 fine.

Correct, but the translation by The Register leaves open the possibility two sentences would add up, which is not implied by the original in French (and does not happen in French law). Being part of the same crime and judged simultaneously, only one sentence of the same nature will be applied. Reference: L132-2, L132-3 CP https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr… Regarding the penalty of 7 years for each of the two offences: L323-1 subpar. 2 CP and L323-3 subpar. 2 CP https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr…

and would likely be lowered substantially in cases involving a minor, like this one.

Specifically, the maximum penalty for a minor is HALF what an adult would face (or 20 years in case an adult would face a life sentence). Reference: L121-5 CJPM https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr…

World’s Largest Digital Human Rights Conference Suddenly ‘Postponed’

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
RightsCon, one of the world’s largest digital human rights conferences, was suddenly postponed by Zambia’s government just days before it was scheduled to begin in Lusaka. Officials cited unresolved speaker clearances and “thematic issues,” while Access Now said it had not yet received formal communication and was seeking an urgent meeting with the government. 404 Media reports:
Minister of Technology and Science Felix Mutati first announced the postponement on April 28, saying that Zambia needed more time to ensure the conference “fully [aligns] with national procedures, diplomatic protocols, and the broader objective of fostering a balanced and consensus-driven platform for dialogue.” “In particular, certain invited speakers and participants remain subject to pending administrative and security clearances, which have not yet been concluded,” he added, according to the Lusaka Times.

[…] On a popular listserv for academics, many of whom are attending RightsCon, a board member of Access Now wrote “I am told I can leak that RightsCon has been canceled. Message from [Access Now] following shortly” in a thread about what attendees were planning on doing. And in an email, AccessNow wrote: “It is with heavy hearts that we share: RightsCon will not proceed in Zambia or online. We understand this news is deeply upsetting for our community and while we know everyone has questions, our goal right now is to notify you of the event’s status because many of you have imminent travel plans. We do not recommend registered participants travel to Lusaka for RightsCon.

Over the last 48 hours we have experienced an overwhelming surge of support from civil society, government representatives, sponsors, and our community as a whole. For this, we wholeheartedly thank you. We’ll communicate more information soon.”

Zambia, you say ?

By greytree • Score: 5, Informative Thread
“Human rights in Zambia are constitutionally guaranteed, but the government frequently restricts freedoms of expression, assembly, and press in practice. Reports indicate serious abuses by security forces, including unlawful killings and torture, as well as arbitrary arrests and detentions.”

Government level trolling

By algaeman • Score: 3 Thread
Go on. Take the money and run

Why?

By ebcdic • Score: 3 Thread

Why was such a conference being held in a country where it would have to “fully [align] with national procedures, diplomatic protocols, and the broader objective of fostering a balanced and consensus-driven platform for dialogue”?

Microsoft Open-Sources ‘Earliest DOS Source Code Discovered To Date’

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica:
Several times in the last couple of decades, Microsoft has released source code for the original MS-DOS operating system that kicked off its decades-long dominance of consumer PCs. This week, the company has reached further back than ever, releasing “the earliest DOS source code discovered to date" along with other documentation and notes from its developer.

Today’s source release is so old that it predates the MS-DOS branding, and it includes “sources to the 86-DOS 1.00 kernel, several development snapshots of the PC-DOS 1.00 kernel, and some well-known utilities such as CHKDSK,” write Microsoft’s Stacey Haffner and Scott Hanselman in their co-authored post about the release. […] This source code is old enough that it hadn’t been stored digitally. “A dedicated team of historians and preservationists led by Yufeng Gao and Rich Cini,” calling itself the “DOS Disassembly Group,” painstakingly transcribed and scanned in code from paper printouts provided by Paterson. This process was made even more difficult because modern OCR software struggled with the quality of the decades-old printout.

Re:OCR struggled?

By LordHighExecutioner • Score: 5, Informative Thread
Don’t be too surprised. I am struggling since a few months with the rebuild of an old FORTRAN program. It is about 15,000 lines of code, only a printout was available, and the OCR replaced randomly ‘0’ with ‘O’, ‘1’ with ‘l’ an so on. Multiple pass with compiler and ftnchek solved most problems, but still something is not OK. Luckily, in the printout there are some test examples…

Re:It’s so old…

By tlhIngan • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Well;, it’s well known that after IBM failed to get an NDA with Digital Research for CP/M-86, they went to Microsoft and asked if they could supply the operating system. Bill Gates agreed and then they purchased a full license of 86-DOS from Seattle Computer Products.

They mildly patched it to get it working on the IBM PC (it was originally designed for SCP’s 8086-based computer).

Note the source code actually existed - the Computer History Museum actually has it as a digital artifact. The only problem was it wasn’t open source - it’s was until now only available as a source-available license for studying and curiosity. What Microsoft did now was put it under MIT license so it’s under a fully open open-source license that lets you compile and build it.

Also, Microsoft paid for a per-customer license for 86-DOS, paying $90,000 for it. The did this knowing they only had one customer - IBM. Eventually they hired the programmer of 86-DOS.

MS-DOS 1.0 wasn’t particularly interesting other than appearing like an independently created version of CP/M. MS-DOS 2.0 added additional services that made MS-DOS look a lot more like an operating system - instead of CP/M opening the files for you (and passing their handle in your process control block), MS-DOS 2 let you actually open a file by calling an open function. (MS-DOS 2.0 inherited a lot of semantics from Xenix).

They were going to open source

By rsilvergun • Score: 4, Funny Thread
The earliest basic code but somebody had already cleaned out the MIT trash cans

Re: Historical

By Malc • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Probably contains bugs for things they’re still including in recent versions of Windows.

Re:OCR struggled?

By 0123456 • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

The PGP encryption source code was printed in a loose-leaf book with checksums on each line to make it easy to OCR.

It was still a huge project because they forgot to convert tabs to spaces (or vice-versa) before printing so software had to be written to try all possible combinations of tabs and spaces on lines where the checksum check failed.

For the Apollo Guidance Computer code they got lucky and had a binary dump of the compiled executable at the end of the listing so they could run the OCR-ed code through the compiler and check for mismatches in the compiled binary to find the OCR errors.

It’s definitely non-trivial and can be even if the developers went out of their way to try to make it easy.

Convicted Former Harvard Scientist Rebuilds Brain Computer Lab In China

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Reuters reports that Charles Lieber, the former Harvard scientist convicted of lying to U.S. authorities about payments and ties to China, is now leading China’s state-funded i-BRAIN lab in Shenzhen, where he has access to advanced nanofabrication tools and primate research facilities for brain-computer interface work. From the report:
Charles Lieber, 67, is among the world’s leading researchers in brain-computer interfaces. The technology has shown promise in treating conditions such as ALS and restoring movement in paralyzed patients. But it also has potential military applications: Scientists at China’s People’s Liberation Army have investigated brain interfaces as a way to engineer super soldiers by boosting mental agility and situational awareness, according to the U.S. Defense Department. Lieber was found guilty by a jury and convicted in December 2021 of making false statements to federal investigators about his ties to a Chinese state program to recruit overseas talent, and tax offenses related to payments he received from a Chinese university. He served two days in prison and six months under house arrest, and was fined $50,000 and ordered to pay $33,600 in restitution to the Internal Revenue Service. During the case, his defense said he was suffering from an incurable lymphoma, which was in remission, and he was fighting for his life.

Three years after he was sentenced, Reuters has learned that Lieber is now overseeing China’s state-funded i-BRAIN, or the Institute for Brain Research, Advanced Interfaces and Neurotechnologies, with access to dedicated nanofabrication equipment and primate research infrastructure unavailable to him at Harvard. The lab is an arm of the Shenzhen Medical Academy of Research and Translation, or SMART. “I arrived on April 28, 2025 with a dream and not much more, maybe a couple bags of clothes,” Lieber said of his move to China at a Shenzhen government conference in December. “Personally, my own goals are to make Shenzhen a world leader.”

SMART last year appointed Lieber as an investigator, according to a post on i-BRAIN’s website dated May 1, 2025. That news was covered by some media outlets. The same day, i-BRAIN said Lieber had also been appointed its founding director — an announcement that went unreported at the time. This story is the most comprehensive account of Lieber’s activities since he moved to China. Reuters is reporting for the first time that his lab has access to dedicated primate research facilities and chip-making equipment; that it sits within a sprawling ecosystem of state-backed institutions bankrolled by billions of dollars in government funding; and that it is housed within an institution that is luring top scientific talent back from the United States.

China

By angryman77 • Score: 3 Thread
It being China we’re taking about, I’m going to go ahead and translate “dedicated primate research facilities” into “prisons.”

How did he leave the country?

By DrMrLordX • Score: 3 Thread

How did this guy leave so easily? Surely he was placed under travel restrictions after the end of his house arrest?

isn’t this just capitalism?

By dfghjk • Score: 3, Insightful Thread

Selling to the highest bidder, isn’t that what the economic geniuses here all support? Funny how greed and racism can come into conflict.

Most Swiss Back Initiative To Cap Population At 10 Million

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
A new poll shows a slim majority of Swiss voters now support a June 14 referendum to cap the country’s population at 10 million by 2050. Under the proposal backed by the right-wing Swiss People’s Party (SVP), “the permanent resident population must not exceed 10 million before 2050, and Switzerland should abandon its freedom of movement agreement with the EU,” reports Reuters. From the report:
Switzerland’s population is now more than 9 million, with official data showing foreign nationals accounted for more than 27% by 2024. The survey, conducted on April 22 and 23 and published in newspaper Tages-Anzeiger, showed 52% of 16,176 respondents in favor of the proposal or leaning that way, while 46% took the opposite view. The rest gave no opinion. A previous poll from early March had shown 45% backing the initiative and 47% against it, the newspaper said, flagging the latest result as unusual in that Swiss referendum proposals generally lose support as the voting day comes closer. The poll had a margin of error of plus or minus 3 percentage points.

Great idea in theory

By MpVpRb • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Endless growth is impossible
We need steady-state sustainability
It will be interesting to see how this works out

Re: Not sure what to think about this

By gurps_npc • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

27% of their population are non-swiss members of the EU that decide to live in Switzerland.

They are not trying to control breeding, they are attempting to stop immigration from the EU.

Re:Not sure what to think about this

By lordmatthias215 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
“If blocking a bunch of illiterates from coming in…” juxtaposes so nicely with "…acting like everything is being done from a purely racist perspective is ridiculous”. All in service of a vacuous argument no one actually contested.

Re:For context

By PCM2 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Swiss are not German are not French are not Dutch.

Correct. They are also not Italian and not Romani. But they do speak Swiss German, Swiss Italian, Swiss French, and Romansh. What they are not (apparently unlike you) are racist-nationalist ideologues. Their Confederation has a longstanding tradition of diversity, multilingualism, and multiculturalism. In that, they are very unlike you, who seem to want to tell them to run their country like a racist ethno-state.

How would I know about their country unless I actively went to study about it.

You also don’t seem to want to fucking educate yourself before you tell others how to live their lives.

Re: Not sure what to think about this

By gurps_npc • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

You are 100% correct.

Britain left the EU in part because of immigration fears. They largely regret it.

OpenAI Codex System Prompt Includes Explicit Directive To ‘Never Talk About Goblins’

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica:
The system prompt for OpenAI’s Codex CLI contains a perplexing and repeated warning for the most recent GPT model to "never talk about goblins, gremlins, raccoons, trolls, ogres, pigeons, or other animals or creatures unless it is absolutely and unambiguously relevant to the user’s query.”

The explicit operational warning was made public last week as part of the latest open source code for Codex CLI that OpenAI posted on GitHub. The prohibition is repeated twice in a 3,500-plus word set of “base instructions” for the recently released GPT-5.5, alongside more anodyne reminders not to “use emojis or em dashes unless explicitly instructed” and to “never use destructive commands like ‘git reset —hard’ or ‘git checkout —' unless the user has clearly asked for that operation.”

Separate system prompt instructions for earlier models contained in the same JSON file do not contain the specific prohibition against mentioning goblins and other creatures, suggesting OpenAI is fighting a new problem that has popped up in its latest model release. Anecdotal evidence on social media shows some users complaining about GPT’s penchant for focusing on goblins in completely unrelated conversations in recent days.
Update: OpenAI has published a blog post explaining "where the goblins came from.”

In short, a training signal meant to encourage its “Nerdy” personality accidentally rewarded creature-heavy metaphors, causing words like “goblins” and “gremlins” to spread beyond that personality into broader model behavior. OpenAI says it has since retired the Nerdy personality, removed the goblin-friendly reward signal, and filtered creature-word examples from training data to keep the quirk from resurfacing in inappropriate contexts.

Funny but serious

By JoshuaZ • Score: 3 Thread
This is obviously pretty funny at some level, and an amusing example of how training can go wrong in somewhat subtle ways. This is in some respects a less substantial example of how [Claude Opus essentially hacked itself into caring a lot more about ethics](https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/ioZxrP7BhS5ArK59w/did-claude-3-opus-align-itself-via-gradient-hacking). But both of these are examples of the same central issues: LLM AIs even in their current form are hard to predict, hard to control, and can end up with very weird hard to predict or adjust behavior.

Re:Funny but serious

By dinfinity • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

To be fair, in this instance they almost specifically instructed the AI to act like this:

“You are an unapologetically nerdy, playful and wise AI mentor to a human. You are passionately enthusiastic about promoting truth, knowledge, philosophy, the scientific method, and critical thinking. […] You must undercut pretension through playful use of language. The world is complex and strange, and its strangeness must be acknowledged, analyzed, and enjoyed. Tackle weighty subjects without falling into the trap of self-seriousness. […]"

Why the hell they thought that is what a “Nerdy” personality is, is a whole different story.

This is what uncurated training causes

By Arrogant-Bastard • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
When you’re trying to train a model, it’s critically important that you scrutinize every piece of training data — meticulously. The larger and more complex the model, the more important this becomes.

If you neglect this, then the model may fail in anomalous and unpredictable ways. In other words: you can run 10,000 tests and they’ll all be just fine, but when you run the 10,001st, the model fails. Worse, you won’t know how…or why…or how to fix it, because the answers to those questions are buried in a network too large for a human being to comprehend. This problem has been well-known for decades; it’s how things like this: Tesla Autopilot Confuses Boy In Orange Shirt For A Cone In Brazil happen. They thought they were training the vision system to recognize traffic cones; they were really training it to recognize orange objects of a certain size and height:width ratio.

Faced with this situation, you can either (a) go back and figure out what you did wrong in the training process or (b) slap a half-ass patch on this particular failure to just make it go away. Choosing (b) is simple and quick and easy and cheap. But if you pick that choice and skip (a), then you have zero assurance that the 15,027th test or the 21,922nd test won’t fail just as badly, because you did nothing to address the root cause.

And predictably, this — choice (b) — s what OpenAI has done. It’s predictable because they made no attempt whatsoever to curate the training data in the first place — they just stole everything they could from the entire Internet — because they’re cheap and lazy and a in hurry to cash in before the bubble bursts. This move is entirely consistent with that approach. I would call it “poor software engineering” but it doesn’t even deserve to be in the same sentence with “engineering”.

DOJ Sues Cloudera For Deliberately Excluding American Workers From Tech Jobs

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Longtime Slashdot reader schwit1 shares a report from ZeroHedge:
The Justice Department on Tuesday sued Cloudera, accusing the enterprise data and artificial intelligence company of deliberately engineering a hiring process that excluded American workers from at least seven lucrative technology positions while the firm pursued permanent residency sponsorship for foreign workers on temporary visas. In a 14-page complaint filed with the Office of the Chief Administrative Hearing Officer, the department’s Civil Rights Division alleges that Cloudera, from March 31, 2024, through at least January 28, 2025, instructed job candidates to submit applications to a dedicated email address, amerijobpostings@cloudera.com, that rejected all external messages with an automated bounce-back error. The company did not advertise the roles on its public careers website or accept applications through its standard portal, as it did for non-sponsorship positions.

Cloudera then attested to the Department of Labor that it could not locate any qualified U.S. workers for the roles, which paid between approximately $180,000 and $294,000 annually, according to the filing. The positions included a Product Manager role in Santa Clara, California, with a listed salary range of $170,186 to $190,000. The case marks one of the most detailed enforcement actions under the Justice Department’s Protecting U.S. Workers Initiative, which was relaunched last year and has already produced 10 settlements targeting employers accused of discriminating against American workers in favor of temporary visa holders. “Employers cannot use the PERM sponsorship process as a backdoor for discriminating against U.S. workers,” Assistant Attorney General Harmeet K. Dhillon of the Civil Rights Division said in a statement. “The Division will not hesitate to sue companies who intentionally deter U.S. workers from applying to American jobs.”

Re:I Wonder Why?

By clovis • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The instances like this that I was aware of had in common that a person in the hiring process was from the same community as the chosen applicants.
It’s a safe bet that a department head from China did not preselect a group of men from India for these jobs. It could happen that way, but I’d bet it didn’t.

Try getting a seasonal job at a Trump property

By echo123 • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Assistant Attorney General Harmeet K. Dhillon of the Civil Rights Division said in a statement. “The Division will not hesitate to sue companies who intentionally deter U.S. workers from applying to American jobs.”

Apparently no Americans want to work at Trump properties, so many, many foreign workers are required.

The President’s family business requested at least 184 foreign workers for Mar-a-Lago, Virginia winery and two golf clubs. This happens every year since forever. The company has been convicted of fraud and banned from doing business in New York.

It was also the fifth time in 10 years that Trump had sought to bring in more than 100 overseas workers for seasonal jobs at Mar-a-Lago, according to data seen by the Palm Beach Post.."

Re:Open borders would be better than this

By rsilvergun • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
You can’t really open borders when you have 6 billion people living in desperate poverty.

There just isn’t enough space in society for that many people.

They’re actually could be but it would require such a tremendous transformation in our civilization and how we view basically everything that it’s completely off the table.

It wouldn’t necessarily be an overall reduction in quality of life but for example you couldn’t drive your SUV to your house in the suburbs with its nice pool and four or five bedrooms. You couldn’t have personal parties at that nice big house you would have to use communal spaces stuff like that.

Also no joke, socially big fancy cars is how teenagers attract dates and I do not know how to replace that. I know it sounds silly but well there it is.

Re:I Wonder Why?

By Captain Segfault • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Fundamentally you have this backwards. This process is a compliance tool, not a recruiting tool.

If you want to sponsor someone for permanent residency, you need to do this PERM process. If you’re in the PERM process, you already have an employee you are happy with, who was already allowed to enter the country on some sort of visa that allows them to work, but you’re essentially required to post a job opening for them to notionally demonstrate they aren’t taking a job from an American — which is broken because, to the extent they did, they already did that probably years ago. Today they have an employee that’s most likely been working for them for years that they’re happy with enough to be willing to sponsor them for permanent residency.

The upshot is that this job posting part of the PERM process is fundamentally adversarial. You’re fundamentally competing with some employee the company is happy with — enough to sponsor them for permanent residency. That person is already ramped up on their projects and already performing well. Practically speaking the company has every incentive to say that you don’t meet some fine print ultra specific requirement that they wouldn’t care about if they were truly looking to hire. (and then maybe maybe they have other positions with different requirements for which you might be a fit.)

And, if you succeed in all this? Congratulations, you’ve fucked over someone trying to get permanent residency, and the employer in question isn’t even obligated to hire you.

Pragmatically speaking, as a job seeker, PERM is fundamentally broken. (and it is broken, again, because it is controlling the wrong end of the process. The time for this sort of test is when granting work visas, not when granting permanent residency.) The only thing these job posts are potentially useful for is giving a snapshot into parts of a company that don’t necessarily have active job posts, noting that there is a bureaucratic incentive to be as specific as legally permissible regarding skillset. At that point you should engage with the company using other non adversarial avenues such as networking or just going through the “front door” normal recruiting process.

Re:I don’t trust this DOJ

By evil_aaronm • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
The DOJ will drop the suit as soon as Cloudera ponies up a bribe - er, donation to the president’s “library.”

First Tesla Semi Rolls Off High-Volume Production Line

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot
Tesla has produced the first Semi from its new high-volume production line at Gigafactory Nevada, a milestone for the long-delayed electric Class 8 truck program after years of pilot builds and delays. Electrek reports:
The Tesla Semi has had one of the longest gestation periods in Tesla’s history. First unveiled in 2017, the truck was originally promised for production in 2019. That target slipped repeatedly — to 2020, then 2021, then 2022 — before Tesla finally delivered a handful of units to PepsiCo in late 2022. Those early trucks were essentially hand-built on a pilot line. Tesla spent the next three years refining the design, cutting roughly 1,000 lbs from the truck, and building out a dedicated factory adjacent to Gigafactory Nevada in Sparks. The company revealed the final production specs in February, confirming two trims: a Standard Range with 325 miles at full 82,000-lb gross combination weight, and a Long Range with 500 miles of range.

Tesla is quoting $290,000 for the 500-mile Long Range version and roughly $260,000 for the Standard Range — making it the lowest-priced Class 8 battery electric tractor on the market. The shift from a pilot line to a high-volume production line is significant. Tesla’s Semi factory is designed for an annual capacity of 50,000 trucks, though the company will ramp gradually. Analysts project deliveries between 5,000 and 15,000 units in 2026, but that sounds way too optimistic. […] Both trims feature an 800-kW tri-motor drivetrain producing 1,072 hp and support 1.2-MW Megacharger speeds, restoring 60% of range in roughly 30 minutes — conveniently timed around a driver’s mandatory rest break. Tesla has opened its first Megacharger station in Ontario, California, and has mapped 66 Megacharger locations across 15 states.

Re: Choke point

By frdmfghtr • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The only way I can express it is by borrowing a line from (I think) WWII British prime minister Winston Churchill: “The Americans can always be counted on to do the right thing, when all other options have been exhausted.”

Re:500 miles?

By Smidge204 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

You realize that the refrigerator unit on those trucks are entirely separate units, right? Whether the truck itself is electric or not, the refrigeration module is going to be an diesel powered unit fitted by a secondary company.

That’s true whether a semi-trailer or box truck.
=Smidge=

Re:Results.

By caseih • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

What are you talking about? All the major manufacturers are currently selling electric trucks of that size and range in Europe. There’s a guy documenting daily long haul driving in Europe with electric trucks. Google for electric trucker or elektrotrucker.

And to head off the inevitable comments, yes European trucks are as big or bigger than American ones. And yes the distances driven are just as long as American routes. Infrastructure for changing is much better than in the US of course, and improving.

How much can it haul?

By cecst • Score: 5, Informative Thread
Class A CDL driver here. The batteries are very heavy but Tesla may have found a way to compensate. Background: conventional wisdom was that EV tractors cannot haul as much as diesel tractors can. The total weight of the tractor-trailer combination is limited to 80K pounds because that’s the limit of the design for bridges in the USA. If the EV tractor weighs more, the weight of the trailer it hauls has to be less than if a diesel tractor were hauling it. But the value of the shipment decreases if less weight is hauled.

Per here, the tare weight of the standard and long range tractors are 20K and 23K lb, and the maximum combination weight for EV tractors is 82K lb (increased by 2K lb for EV tractors), yielding maximum trailer weights of 62K and 59K lb, respectively.

For diesel tractors, the manufacturers make it hard to find the weight because the exact weight depends so much on the features of the tractor (for example, sleeper versus day cab). But an online calculator offers 25K lb as a representative weight for class 8 tractors.

So if a typical diesel tractor weighs 25K and the new long-range Tesla EV tractor weighs 23K, weight would appear not to be a factor in the comparison with diesel technology, and the other considerations (charge time, range, safety) would appear to be the important ones.

Re:How much can it haul?

By shilly • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

The weight issue isn’t nothing, but it’s amenable to solving because structural batteries mean you can get rid of heavy ladder frames and in-axle motors mean you can get rid of engines, differentials and a bunch of other stuff, too — which in an artic account for thousands of kilos.

I don’t know about the US, but in Europe, most freight is volume-constrained, not weight-consrained