Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. GNOME 49 ‘Brescia’ Desktop Environment Released
  2. Chimps Drinking a Lager a Day in Ripe Fruit, Study Finds
  3. Sony Quietly Downgrades PS5 Digital Edition Storage To 825GB at Same Price
  4. Congress Asks Valve, Discord, and Twitch To Testify On ‘Radicalization’
  5. Flying Cars Crash Into Each Other At Air Show In China
  6. Microsoft Favors Anthropic Over OpenAI For Visual Studio Code
  7. Gemini AI Solves Coding Problem That Stumped 139 Human Teams At ICPC World Finals
  8. Extreme Heat Spurs New Laws Aimed at Protecting Workers Worldwide
  9. AI’s Ability To Displace Jobs is Advancing Quickly, Anthropic CEO Says
  10. Darkest Nights Are Getting Lighter
  11. OpenAI Says Models Programmed To Make Stuff Up Instead of Admitting Ignorance
  12. Corals Won’t Survive a Warmer Planet, a New Study Finds
  13. After Years of Resistance, Apple Might Finally Release a Touchscreen MacBook Pro
  14. Business Insider Reportedly Tells Journalists They Can Use AI To Draft Stories
  15. Is TV’s Golden Age (Officially) Over? A Statistical Analysis

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

GNOME 49 ‘Brescia’ Desktop Environment Released

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
prisoninmate shares a report from 9to5Linux:
The GNOME Project released today GNOME 49 “Brescia" as the latest stable version of this widely used desktop environment for GNU/Linux distributions, a major release that introduces exciting new features. Highlights of GNOME 49 include a new “Do Not Disturb” toggle in Quick Settings, a dedicated Accessibility menu in the login screen, support for handling unknown power profiles in the Quick Settings menu, support for YUV422 and YUV444 (HDR) color spaces, support for passive screen casts, and support for async keyboard map settings.

GNOME 49 also introduces support for media controls, restart and shutdown actions on the lock screen, support for dynamic users for greeter sessions in the GNOME Display Manager (GDM), and support for per-monitor brightness sliders in Quick Settings on multi-monitor setups.
For a full list of changes, check out the release notes.

Chimps Drinking a Lager a Day in Ripe Fruit, Study Finds

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
Wild chimpanzees have been found to consume the equivalent of a bottle of lager’s alcohol a day from eating ripened fruit, scientists say. BBC:
They say this is evidence humans may have got our taste for alcohol from common primate ancestors who relied on fermented fruit — a source of sugar and alcohol — for food. “Human attraction to alcohol probably arose from this dietary heritage of our common ancestor with chimpanzees,” said study researcher Aleksey Maro of the University of California, Berkeley.

Chimps, like many other animals, have been spotted feeding on ripe fruit lying on the forest floor, but this is the first study to make clear how much alcohol they might be consuming. The research team measured the amount of ethanol, or pure alcohol, in fruits such as figs and plums eaten in large quantities by wild chimps in Cote d’Ivoire and Uganda. Based on the amount of fruit they normally eat, the chimps were ingesting around 14 grams of ethanol — equivalent to nearly two UK units, or roughly one 330ml bottle of lager. The fruits most commonly eaten were those highest in alcohol content.

Sony Quietly Downgrades PS5 Digital Edition Storage To 825GB at Same Price

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
Sony has quietly introduced a revised PlayStation 5 Digital Edition that reduces internal storage from 1TB to 825GB while maintaining the same 499 Euro ($590) price point. The CFI-2116 revision has appeared on Amazon listings across Italy, Germany, Spain and France without official announcement from Sony.

The storage downgrade returns the console to its original 825GB capacity last seen in the launch PlayStation 5 before the Slim models increased storage to 1TB. Users lose approximately 175 of usable space in the new revision. Amazon Germany lists October 23 as the delivery date for units already available for purchase. The change affects only the Digital Edition while the disc version remains unchanged at 1TB. The revision follows Sony’s September price increase of $50 across PlayStation 5 models citing economic conditions.

shrinkflation!

By Joe_Dragon • Score: 3 Thread

shrinkflation!

Congress Asks Valve, Discord, and Twitch To Testify On ‘Radicalization’

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Polygon:
The CEOs of Discord, Steam, Twitch, and Reddit have been called to Congress to testify about the “radicalization of online forum users” on those platforms, the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee announced Wednesday. “Congress has a duty to oversee the online platforms that radicals have used to advance political violence,” said chairman of the House Oversight Committee James Comer, a Republican from Kentucky, in a statement. “To prevent future radicalization and violence, the CEOs of Discord, Steam, Twitch, and Reddit must appear before the Oversight Committee and explain what actions they will take to ensure their platforms are not exploited for nefarious purposes.”

Letters from the House Oversight Committee have been sent to Humam Sakhnini, CEO of Discord; Gabe Newell, president of Steam maker Valve; Dan Clancy, CEO of Twitch; and Steve Huffman, CEO of Reddit, requesting their testimony on Oct. 8. “The hearing will examine radicalization of online forum users, including incidents of open incitement to commit violent politically motivated acts,” Comer said in a letter to each CEO. […] Discord, Steam, Twitch, and Reddit execs will have the chance to deliver five-minute opening statements prior to answering questions posed by members of the committee during October’s testimony.

OMFG.

By Gravis Zero • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Why don’t these assholes ask the actual experts on the subject matter? Oh wait, you did and you didn’t like the answers so you had them deleted.

Well… I guess it’s time to hassle some unrelated companies until they give us the sound bytes we want instead of addressing the actual problem of lax gun control.

Everybody knows where the pipelines are

By rsilvergun • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
That are designed to take disaffected young men and convert them into extremists. There’s a handful of spaces on Facebook and Twitter, there’s a bunch of discord channels and then you’ve got the chans.

If they’re going after valve it’s because they’re going after video games. They have been wanting to go after video games for years and years and years. There is something about the right wing where they really hate video games. TV and movies too. And they aren’t too fond of books.

A big part of it is they want to control your media choices so you don’t have any. I don’t think they ever really got over the printing press.

And they want you at church. Tithing.

Re:Theatre.

By ndsurvivor • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
Thank you, I do believe that many years of experience reading history, and a few years of listening to right wing nut jobs like Trump saying “ANTIFA” over and over again qualifies me to give an opinion. I keep on asking MAGA’s, asking you to define who is ANTIFA? Where is their headquarters? Who are their leaders? It is just a vague term for people that they hate. The people that MAGAs hate are the people who believe in the Constitution of the United States of America.

Propaganda

By NotEmmanuelGoldstein • Score: 3 Thread
Congress isn’t interviewing the CEOs of Twitter/Truth Social/4chan: I wonder why?

These networks have proven, highly-abusive posters: Still a small proportion of the population but the racists on these platforms make a point of glorifying their cruelty.

Other posters are correct: This is ‘something I don’t like, happened’, ‘I’m the victim’, and ‘somebody else, do something’ propaganda: Whatever the results, Fox News/the GOP/Trump/Miller/Voight will re-write history (memory-hole facts) to decrease the power of the people truly suffering, AKA gaslighting.

Flying Cars Crash Into Each Other At Air Show In China

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Two Xpeng AeroHT flying cars collided during a rehearsal for the Changchun Air Show in China, with one vehicle catching fire upon landing. While the company reported no serious injuries, CNN reported one person was injured in the crash. The BBC reports:
Footage on Chinese social media site Weibo appeared to show a flaming vehicle on the ground which was being attended to by fire engines. One vehicle “sustained fuselage damage and caught fire upon landing,” Xpeng AeroHT said in a statement to CNN. “All personnel at the scene are safe, and local authorities have completed on-site emergency measures in an orderly manner,” it added.

The electric flying cars take off and land vertically, and the company is hoping to sell them for around $300,000 each. In January, Xpeng claimed to have around 3,000 orders for the vehicle. […] It has said it wants to lead the world in the “low-altitude economy.”

Nailed it.

By Gravis Zero • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Two flying cars crashed into each other at a rehearsal for an air show in China which was meant to be a showcase for the technology.

I think this was a perfect showcase of the flying car concept.

VTOL or VTOLC

By viperidaenz • Score: 3 Thread

Vertical Take-Off, Landing, and Crashing.

Microsoft Favors Anthropic Over OpenAI For Visual Studio Code

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Microsoft is now prioritizing Anthropic’s Claude 4 over OpenAI’s GPT-5 in Visual Studio Code’s auto model feature, signaling a quiet but clear shift in preference. The Verge reports:
“Based on internal benchmarks, Claude Sonnet 4 is our recommended model for GitHub Copilot,” said Julia Liuson, head of Microsoft’s developer division, in an internal email in June. While that guidance was issued ahead of the GPT-5 release, I understand Microsoft’s model guidance hasn’t changed.

Microsoft is also making “significant investments” in training its own AI models. “We’re also going to be making significant investments in our own cluster. So today, MAI-1-preview was only trained on 15,000 H100s, a tiny cluster in the grand scheme of things,” said Microsoft AI chief Mustafa Suleyman, in an employee-only town hall last week.

Microsoft is also reportedly planning to use Anthropic’s AI models for some features in its Microsoft 365 apps soon. The Information reports that the Microsoft 365 Copilot will be “partly powered by Anthropic models,” after Microsoft found that some of these models outperformed OpenAI in Excel and PowerPoint.

Gemini AI Solves Coding Problem That Stumped 139 Human Teams At ICPC World Finals

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica:
Like the rest of its Big Tech cadre, Google has spent lavishly on developing generative AI models. Google’s AI can clean up your text messages and summarize the web, but the company is constantly looking to prove that its generative AI has true intelligence. The International Collegiate Programming Contest (ICPC) helps make the point. Google says Gemini 2.5 participated in the 2025 ICPC World Finals, turning in a gold medal performance. According to Google this marks “a significant step on our path toward artificial general intelligence.”

Every year, thousands of college-level coders participate in the ICPC event, facing a dozen deviously complex coding and algorithmic puzzles over five grueling hours. This is the largest and longest-running competition of its type. To compete in the ICPC, Google connected Gemini 2.5 Deep Think to a remote online environment approved by the ICPC. The human competitors were given a head start of 10 minutes before Gemini began “thinking.”

According to Google, it did not create a freshly trained model for the ICPC like it did for the similar International Mathematical Olympiad (IMO) earlier this year. The Gemini 2.5 AI that participated in the ICPC is the same general model that we see in other Gemini applications. However, it was “enhanced” to churn through thinking tokens for the five-hour duration of the competition in search of solutions. At the end of the time limit, Gemini managed to get correct answers for 10 of the 12 problems, which earned it a gold medal. Only four of 139 human teams managed the same feat. “The ICPC has always been about setting the highest standards in problem-solving,” said ICPC director Bill Poucher. “Gemini successfully joining this arena, and achieving gold-level results, marks a key moment in defining the AI tools and academic standards needed for the next generation.”
Gemini’s solutions are available on GitHub.

Yeah right

By backslashdot • Score: 4, Funny Thread

Give it UI problems.

Computers are fast. News at 11.

By SpinyNorman • Score: 3 Thread

> However, it was “enhanced” to churn through thinking tokens for the five-hour duration of the competition in search of solutions.

If you read the comments on the linked story, one is from a competitor from a prior years competition who notes that his competition always has a “time sink” problem that smart humans will steer clear of unless that have solved everything else.

Apparently it took Gemini 30 minutes of solve this one time sink problem “C”. The article doesn’t say what hardware Gemini was running on, but apparently the dollar cost of this30 min run was high enough that they’d rather not say. Impressive perhaps, but I’m not sure that the correct takeaway is what a great programmer Gemini is (if so, when did it take 30 min ?!), but rather that with brute force search lots of time consuming things can be achieved.

A lot of training here - still impressive

By TheMiddleRoad • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The general model has been thoroughly trained on these types of problems. Then they tweaked it for the specific challenge. Then they ran it with tons of processing power, more than any normal person gets. And all of this was for very, very, very specific types of coding problems.

https://worldfinals.icpc.globa…

It’s not intelligence. It’s processing.

Re:It’s great at solving small hard problems.

By Mr. Barky • Score: 4, Funny Thread

0120 :)

Extreme Heat Spurs New Laws Aimed at Protecting Workers Worldwide

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
Governments worldwide are implementing heat protection laws as 2.4 billion workers face extreme temperature exposure and 19,000 die annually from heat-related workplace injuries, according to a World Health Organization and World Meteorological Organization report.

Japan imposed $3,400 fines for employers failing to provide cooling measures when wet-bulb temperatures reach 28C. Singapore mandated hourly temperature sensors at large outdoor sites and requires 15-minute breaks every hour at 33C wet-bulb readings. Southern European nations ordered afternoon work stoppages this summer when temperatures exceeded 115F across Greece, Italy and Spain.

The United States lacks federal heat standards; only California, Colorado, Maryland, Minnesota, Nevada, Oregon and Washington have state-level protections. Boston passed requirements for heat illness prevention plans on city projects. Enforcement remains inconsistent — Singapore inspectors found nearly one-third of 70 sites violated the 2023 law. Texas and Florida prohibit local governments from mandating rest and water breaks.

115F?

By thegarbz • Score: 3 Thread

Is there a maximum limit to the number of times you can say Celsius in a paragraph before an American’s head explodes? Is that why the units were mixed in the most braindead way while talking about a group of countries that explicitly don’t use Fahrenheit?

Meanwhile…

By abulafia • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
The US is dropping workplace safety monitoring, particularly for all those miners whom a certain nostalgic segment of people who have never worked in mines like to claim they’re looking out for.

The US was doing something. That effort appears dead now.

Instead, states like Florida and Texas are heading the other direction, making it impossible for local government to protect people.

I’m sure your foreman will allow you have water every 2 hours, he’s a nice guy, right? Not that like that last jerk.

Re:Meanwhile…

By El Fantasmo • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

It’s real. Texas has banned it. A state run by so-called “pro-life” “Christians” who espouse “small and limited government” have, once again, overturned a life saving measures enacted by local city governments.

https://thehill.com/opinion/he…

AI’s Ability To Displace Jobs is Advancing Quickly, Anthropic CEO Says

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
The ability of AI displace humans at various tasks is accelerating quickly, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei said at an Axios event on Wednesday. From the report:
Amodei and others have previously warned of the possibility that up to half of white-collar jobs could be wiped out by AI over the next five years. The speed of that displacement could require government intervention to help support the workforce, executives said.

“As with most things, when an exponential is moving very quickly, you can’t be sure,” Amodei said. “I think it is likely enough to happen that we felt there was a need to warn the world about it and to speak honestly.” Amodei said the government may need to step in and support people as AI quickly displaces human work.

Tool X is gonna make you tons of money!

By Kokuyo • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

…says producer of tool X.

And we care because..?

Wat! What?

By PPH • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei said

He’s still here?

I’ll believe that AI works when he’s standing in front of a Home Depot.

Quit paranoid stupidity

By backslashdot • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

AI is increasing jobs. Nobody is getting not hired or fired due to AI. The thing we’re losing jobs to is inflation due to tariff bullshit. Inflation is reducing the number of people going to restaurants and things like that. If AI was taking jobs and doing things more efficient we’d see the price of goods collapsing.

Amateur!

By Locke2005 • Score: 5, Funny Thread
AI will never be able to steal office supplies as adeptly as I do!

Darkest Nights Are Getting Lighter

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
Light pollution now doubles every eight years globally as LED adoption accelerates artificial brightness worldwide. A recent study measured 10% annual growth in light pollution from 2011 to 2022. Northern Chile’s Atacama Desert remains one of the few Bortle Scale 1 locations — the darkest rating for astronomical observation — though La Serena’s population has nearly doubled in 25 years. The region hosts major observatories including the Vera C. Rubin Observatory at Cerro Pachon.

Satellite constellations pose additional challenges: numbers have increased from hundreds decades ago to 12,000 currently operating satellites. Astronomers predict 100,000 or more satellites within a decade. Chile faces pressure from proposed mining operations including the 7,400-acre INNA green-hydrogen facility near key astronomical sites despite national laws limiting artificial light from mining operations that generate over half the country’s exports.

Lost Cause

By goldspider • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Outside of a very small community (of which I am a member) this won’t even register as a problem, let alone motivate a sizeable number of people to do anything about it. Our species lacks the will to even stop literally poisoning ourselves.

I’ve brought europeans

By wakeboarder • Score: 3 Thread

where I live, they can’t believe there are so many stars. They have never seen the milky way.

OpenAI Says Models Programmed To Make Stuff Up Instead of Admitting Ignorance

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
AI models often produce false outputs, or “hallucinations.” Now OpenAI has admitted they may result from fundamental mistakes it makes when training its models. The Register:
The admission came in a paper [PDF] published in early September, titled “Why Language Models Hallucinate,” and penned by three OpenAI researchers and Santosh Vempala, a distinguished professor of computer science at Georgia Institute of Technology. It concludes that “the majority of mainstream evaluations reward hallucinatory behavior.”

The fundamental problem is that AI models are trained to reward guesswork, rather than the correct answer. Guessing might produce a superficially suitable answer. Telling users your AI can’t find an answer is less satisfying. As a test case, the team tried to get an OpenAI bot to report the birthday of one of the paper’s authors, OpenAI research scientist Adam Tauman Kalai. It produced three incorrect results because the trainers taught the engine to return an answer, rather than admit ignorance. “Over thousands of test questions, the guessing model ends up looking better on scoreboards than a careful model that admits uncertainty,” OpenAI admitted in a blog post accompanying the release.

Wrong explanation

By WaffleMonster • Score: 5, Informative Thread

They make shit up because they have no meta-cognition and don’t know any better.

Re:No shit

By ndsurvivor • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
I recently gave AI’s a paradox. When an ideal 10uF cap is charged to 100V, it has x charge, when an uncharged cap of 100uF is placed in parallel, the voltage goes to about 9.1V and the total energy is about 0.1x. If energy is neither destroyed nor created, where did the energy go? The AI kind of forgets that I specified an “ideal” capacitor, and makes shit up. If a human can explain this to me, I am all ears. Please keep in mind: “Ideal capacitor”, and “equations show this”, don’t make shit up.

Re:Wrong explanation

By korgitser • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
This is a great time to remind ourselves that a LLM is just a fancy autocomplete engine.

And that’s why I cancelled

By Oh really now • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
If you can’t trust the info it gives, it’s worth nothing.

Generative vs Factual

By devslash0 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I think the problem is definition itself. Generative AI. If they need to generate an answer, then good chances are it’ll end up whatever the model believes to be correct, statistically speaking.

But on the internet actual facts and answers are rare. Most of help-me threads are 99.99% crap and one or two people providing an actual, helpful response but those few units drown among all the other crap because hey - statistics don’t favour truths.

Kind of like in democracy. Two uneducated dropouts have more power than one university lecturer.

But I digress…

If AI models were to return facts, we’d call them search agents, search engines…

Oh, wait.

Corals Won’t Survive a Warmer Planet, a New Study Finds

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
If global temperatures continue rising, virtually all the corals in the Atlantic Ocean will stop growing and could succumb to erosion by the end of the century, a new study finds. From a report:
The analysis of over 400 existing coral reefs across the Atlantic Ocean estimates that more than 70 percent of the region’s reefs will begin dying by 2040 even under optimistic climate warming scenarios. And if the planet exceeds 2 degrees Celsius of warming above preindustrial temperatures by the end of the century, 99 percent of corals in the region would meet this fate. Today, the planet has warmed about 1.3 degrees Celsius over preindustrial temperatures.

The implications are grave. Corals act as the fundamental building blocks of reefs, providing habitat for thousands of species of fish and other marine life. They are also bulwarks that break up waves and help protect shorelines from rising sea levels. A quarter of all ocean life depends on coral reefs and over a billion people worldwide benefit from them, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

So Long…

By Jason Earl • Score: 5, Funny Thread

…and thanks for all the fish.

Corals are Ancient

By bill_mcgonigle • Score: 4, Informative Thread

The Earth has frequently been much warmer than it is today and coral reefs grew much faster then.

Perhaps they have a fine point to make but the implications fly in the face of established evidence.

And not shaky evidence - you can go vacation on huge islands made of these old reefs, from when the oceans were higher.

You can go visit Chazy Fossil Reef today and see coral fossils 480 million years old, from when Northern Vermont was a tropical marine environment.

These data aren’t disputed in the field.

Re:Corals are Ancient

By skam240 • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Big omission in your thinking. Past high temperatures took thousands of years at a minimum to get that high, meanwhile we’re doing the same in decades. Most life cant adapt that quickly and present day reefs cant handle those high temperatures.

Re:Corals are Ancient

By Geoffrey.landis • Score: 5, Informative Thread

You can go visit Chazy Fossil Reef today and see coral fossils 480 million years old, from when Northern Vermont was a tropical marine environment.

Not exactly. You can see fossils of organisms that are called “corals”, but they are not related to the organisms we call coral today.

Rugose and tabulate corals became extinct in the Permian–Triassic extinction event 250 million years ago, and a different form of reef-building organism arose ten of millions of years later.

After Years of Resistance, Apple Might Finally Release a Touchscreen MacBook Pro

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader shares a report:
After years of dismissing the idea of putting a touchscreen on a MacBook, it seems Apple may have finally caved. Its MacBook Pro overhaul in 2026 is now expected to be the first-ever MacBook to feature a touchscreen display, according to a report from supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo on X.

The change will reportedly affect Apple’s next-generation MacBook Pro, which could feature an OLED display and “incorporate a touch panel using on-cell touch technology.” The OLED MacBook Pro isn’t expected to enter production until late 2026, and before then, Apple is expected to launch the M5 MacBook Pro in early 2026.

Pen input touchscreen

By mlyle • Score: 3 Thread

I don’t care about a touchscreen, but if it folded over and took pen input, I’d be a big fan.

Touchscreen mostly for the technically challenged?

By Anonymous Coward • Score: 3, Informative Thread

Overwhelmingly, it’s a subset of technically challenged people I see clamoring for touchscreens on laptops, when I’m in a work environment.

This is just anecdotal, of course, but does anyone here actually strongly care about this feature on laptops? What utility does a touchscreen bring you for work?

does this portend..

By e432776 • Score: 3 Thread
..the merger of MacOS and iPadOS?

Don’t do it!

By OrangeTide • Score: 3 Thread

Fingerprints all over your screen? Gross!

Actually I have two PC laptops with touchscreens. I disabled them when I moved to Linux because they are not useful to me and it’s too easy to bump them when closing the lid. (and on Linux there was a bug where the touch screen was still active when using an external display - sending your mouse cursor screaming all over the desktop)

Business Insider Reportedly Tells Journalists They Can Use AI To Draft Stories

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader shares a report:
Business Insider has told journalists they can use AI to create first drafts of stories and suggested it won’t notify readers that AI was used, according to Status, a newsletter covering the media industry. The policy makes the outlet one of the first to formally allow such extensive use of the technology.

The AI guidelines were reportedly circulated in an internal memo from editor-in-chief Jamie Heller on Thursday. The policy authorized journalists to deploy AI “like any other tool” for tasks like research and image editing, Status reported.

Re:Funny!

By PDXNerd • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

one of the first to formally allow such extensive use of the technology.

They (the industry) have been using it and haven’t mentioned it, at least Business Insider is admitting it. Anyway putting “AI draft” on an article would result in less readers so its in their financial best interest to use this as much as possible and not admit it.

AI is no problem but…

By Teun • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
AI is for me no problem but some human needs to sign off on it.
There are plenty of cases where AI comes up with invented stories (hallucinations) and we need to be able to address a human when corrections are required.

Content Mill

By nealric • Score: 3 Thread

Business Insider is already a content mill. I suspect that “allowing” AI will become a de facto requiring its use because there will be productivity requirements that would be impossible without it.

And nothing of value was lost.

By whoever57 • Score: 3 Thread

Remember: we are talking about Business Insider here.

Is TV’s Golden Age (Officially) Over? A Statistical Analysis

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot
Scripted TV production peaked in 2022 at 599 shows and has declined since, according to FX’s research division tracking. New prestige series have dropped sharply while streaming platforms prioritize returning shows over new development. Netflix has shifted majority output to unscripted content including docuseries and reality programming since 2018.

YouTube leads streaming viewership ahead of Netflix, Paramount+, and Hulu. Free ad-supported platforms YouTube, Tubi and Roku Channel continue gaining market share. Subscription prices across major streaming services have increased while scripted content volume decreased. Second season of Severance cost $200 million. Fourth season of Stranger Things reached $270 million in production expenses.

Been over for some time

By TWX • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

The golden age of TV ended when the scripted age of TV gave way to low-effort ‘reality’ TV.

Re:Been 20+ years now…

By jfdavis668 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
The Golden Age ended long ago. TV continued to put out good shows, but there were a lot of poor shows to go with them. It died when reality TV started to take over. It was cheaper to record people doing whatever than it was to put thought into good scripts and plots.

Can’t be done quantitatively

By nealric • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

The problem is the number of scripted shows doesn’t tell us much about the number of quality scripted shows, and quality is in the eye of the beholder. TV has continued to adapt over the years, and people have different preferences. There was:

1) The original “golden age” in the 1950s when TV was just starting up. Because there were only a small number of channels and because everything had to be of general interest, these were relatively high effort productions but were unable to take any real risks. It tended to be more “light entertainment” than anything serious.

2) The 60s-70s was the dawn of color and the beginning to diversify into some level of special interest. But the increase in volume meant production values were typically far below film.

3) The 80-90s was when cable started to seriously challenge broadcast and TV became a mature medium. A lot of TV was pretty vapid dreck. The insipid laugh tracks and tired gags. But there’s still a lot of nostalgia for the sitcoms of that era. Nobody was yet trying for a cinematic experience in TV.

4) 00s-2010s was the beginning of “prestige” TV (in part as a reaction to cheaply produced “reality” TV). Cable and early streaming produced shows like the Sopranos (cable) and House of Cards/Breaking Bad (streaming) that had dramatic ambitions and production quality of feature film. That era isn’t fully over, but the streaming wars have caused the sheer volume of prestige TV to hit its limits.

5) 2020s-present has been defined by the rise of youtubers and the streaming wars.

The general arc has been more and more segmentation in entertainment. Early TV entertainment had to appeal to the widest possible audience because there were only 2-3 choices of what to watch. Today, there’s content for every conceivable niche and it’s available at any time of day or night (no competition for timeslots anymore). This is great if you want content tailored to your specific interest, but it can make it hard to break through as something intended for a general audience. With AI, we could envision a world where media is created specifically for you individually and the number of “shows” becomes infinite.

Short Seasons

By crow • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

It used to be 26 episodes per season, with each episode airing twice during the year. It was a nice, simple way of filling the broadcast schedule. That shifted to 24 episodes at some point. There was a bigger shift, I think in the early 2000s, where they started having separate shows for the summer, and seasons started getting much shorter, sometimes more like 13 episodes. Now streaming services will put out 6-7 episode seasons; only a quarter of what a season used to be.

The good part of this is that you no longer get filler episodes. I remember watching shows like Stargate SG-1, and there were inevitably a few junk episodes, like a clip show that has some excuse to edit together a bunch of clips of previous episodes, or some episode that really didn’t do much because they clearly spent all their budget already. I don’t miss those. But with only 6 episodes, it’s down to the same run-time as a miniseries, and things sometimes feel rushed.

For shows that are telling a story over the course of a season, the shorter episodes sometimes work well, but for more episodic shows (like Doctor Who), it just feels like you’re getting shorted (because you are).

For many shows, the driving force is the quality of the writing and acting. Would the studios do better to spend less on the production and get more episodes for the same money? Good stories outweigh good effects.

Not Outside the US

By Roger W Moore • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
US television was like that back in the late 90’s when I lived there for a few years and the insane frequency of ad breaks made it unwatchable for me, coming from Europe where channels like the BBC were completely ad-free and even the commercial stations were limited to 2 breaks in a 60 minute show and 1 in a 30 minute show.

While the golden age has ended now in Europe too - the BBC is a pale shadow of its former self - I’d say it lasted longer that US TV that, from my point of view, was already dead back in the late 90’s. The only way I could watch anything on US TV was to tape it and then fast forward through the incessant breaks. Streaming revived things for a while back when it was just Netflix but now that has got fragmented, ads are creeping in again and I expect that will be almost as bad as TV by the time they are finished unless someone manages to develop an ad blocker that works on them.