Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. More Police Officers Fired, Investigated, or Arrested for Misusing Flock Camera Systems
  2. America’s First Grid-Scale Sodium-Ion Battery Plant Gets Its First Big Test
  3. Paper Goods Company Is Investigating an Alternative to Trees
  4. Microsoft, Google, Amazon, Meta and Oracle Expect a Negative Cash Flow of $125 Billion Next Year
  5. Prime Minister Leaves Door Open For Reviewing Policy of No Nuclear Weapons in Japan
  6. Before and After Views of SpaceX Rocket’s Moon Crash
  7. NASA Figured Out How To Keep Its 48-Year-Old Voyager 2 Probe Running For Yet Another Year
  8. Woman Pulled From Car at Gunpoint By Police After Mistaken Flock Alert - Twice
  9. Trump Administration To Pay German Firm $1.2 Billion To Halt US Wind Projects
  10. Virginia Governor To Intervene In Dominion-NextEra Merger
  11. Water Utilities Group Partners With DEF CON Offshoot For Water Watch Center
  12. Kalshi and Polymarket Bets On Clinical Trials Criticized As ‘Ghastly’
  13. ‘Asimov Was Right’ About Rules For Robots, Says Ex-US Cyber Director
  14. Framework Notifies ‘All Customers’ of a Data Breach Via Compromised Metabase BI Service
  15. Suno Says It Will Start Watermarking Songs

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

More Police Officers Fired, Investigated, or Arrested for Misusing Flock Camera Systems

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
In Georgia the Savannah Police Department “terminated four sworn officers and two civilian employees following an internal investigation into misuse of the department’s Flock Safety License Plate Reader system,” according to a local news report:
All six cases are also under independent criminal investigation by the Georgia Bureau of Investigation… Investigators found that employees were running searches on personal acquaintances and family members. One officer was found to have given someone from an outside law enforcement agency access to SPD’s Flock Safety system, which they weren’t authorized to do.
Elsewhere ABC News reports that a female North Carolina police officer was arrested Wednesday “for allegedly using Flock license plate readers to track her boyfriend’s ex-wife, according to police…” The officer is accused of accessing the system for personal use 31 different times, including at least twice when she was off-duty, and listing most of the lookups as motor vehicle infractions. [Police chief Ron] Campurciani “added that the department is looking at 10 other potential misuse cases and said three ‘look like they could be problematic.’"

And an Ohio news station reports a police officer who recently resigned “while under internal investigation repeatedly used the Flock license plate reader system to search a vehicle registered to someone investigators identified as his likely domestic partner.”

Meanwhile, 404 Media reported this week that an Iowa county’s usage police specifically tells police officers — in all capital letters — not to tell occupants of a vehicle that an automated license plate reader was used for a traffic stop. It also instructs officers to not even mention the use of the ALPR technology in their reports “unless absolutely necessary,” according to information they’d obtained from a public records request,” suggesting they instead they call the cameras “county resources”:
It is not just local police in small communities who are creating policies designed to obfuscate Flock usage. Earlier this year, we reported that police in multiple states were being told to be “as vague as permissible” about why they were using Flock because their searches could be obtained using public records requests, and that warning was being shared by the FBI and Department of Justice…

In the [Iowa county] public records request, Sheriff Don Phillips said “there is no need” to tell people about the use of Flock… “because the information is verified by the deputy running the license plate. It is common practice for law enforcement to refrain from disclosing investigative methods and sources to prevent criminals from learning how to circumvent them.”

Re:Welp

By Scutter • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Why does Flock have to be honest to the public in any way? Are they under oath? Genuinely asking?

I know reading comprehension is hard, but even the summary has specific examples of police creating a policy to hide their use of Flock cameras. We’re not talking about Flock being honest to the public. We’re talking about police behavior.

Great

By Tailhook • Score: 3 Thread

Now watch the “fired” officers get hired the next day in another jurisdiction.

America’s First Grid-Scale Sodium-Ion Battery Plant Gets Its First Big Test

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“In a milestone for energy storage technology, Peak Energy has selected Sacramento, California, as the home of America’s first manufacturing facility dedicated to grid-scale sodium-ion battery systems,” according to the sustainability news site Intelligent Living.

The move “represents the first large-scale test of whether sodium-ion technology can deliver on its promise of cheaper, safer, and more sustainable grid storage at a scale that actually moves the needle for the U.S. electricity system.”
The 183,000-square-foot plant, representing a $71 million investment, will produce up to 4 gigawatt-hours of storage annually when production begins in early 2027. That is enough output each year to serve nearly four million homes, and it signals that sodium-ion technology has moved from laboratory promise to commercial reality… Peak Energy, founded in 2023 by former engineers from Tesla, Enovix, and Fluence, announced its Sacramento site selection on July 8, 2026, after a nationwide search that ultimately chose California over Texas… The factory is designed as a system assembly plant rather than a cell fabrication facility. Peak will receive sodium-ion cells, manufactured to its specifications by Chinese suppliers, and assemble them into complete 30-foot-long, 100,000-pound containerized storage systems. Each GS1.1 unit stores 3.1 megawatt-hours, enough to fully charge more than 40 electric vehicles…

In the United States, Peak Energy has emerged as the most advanced grid-scale player. It has secured more than 6 GWh of customer commitments, including a landmark deal with Jupiter Power for up to 4.75 GWh through 2030, valued at up to $500 million. Energy Vault has committed to 1.5 GWh of sodium-ion storage for AI data center applications, and RWE Americas has already deployed Peak’s first grid-scale system on the MISO grid in Wisconsin, energized in March 2026. General Motors is codeveloping sodium-ion cells with Peak at its Wallace Battery Cell Innovation Center in Michigan, testing 170- and 190-amp-hour cell formats with domestic production targeted for 2028. China, however, remains the global heavyweight. CATL, the world’s largest battery manufacturer, unveiled its TENER Sodium energy storage system in June 2026 with a rated cycle life of 15,000 cycles and a projected 25-to-30-year service life. In April 2026, CATL signed a 60 GWh supply agreement with HyperStrong, the largest sodium-ion deal announced to date. BYD, HiNa Battery, and Farasis are also shipping commercial sodium-ion products, including batteries for a $400 electric scooter already on sale in China…

Peak Energy’s first commercial shipments from Sacramento are slated for the first quarter of 2027, with contracted deliveries to Jupiter Power, Energy Vault, and RWE Americas following shortly after. The company has publicly stated it needs to deploy over $100 million in product in 2026, up from roughly $10 million in 2025, and the Sacramento facility is sized to meet that demand. At the system level, sodium-ion grid storage is already operating. Peak’s pilot installation at the SolarTAC testing facility in Watkins, Colorado, stores 3.5 MWh and has been running since 2025. The RWE Americas deployment in Wisconsin, energized in March 2026, marks the first time sodium-ion batteries have backed up the MISO grid, which serves 15 central U.S. states and the Canadian province of Manitoba…

According to the International Energy Agency, sodium-ion manufacturing capacity announcements have accelerated sharply since 2024, with global pipelines now exceeding 400 GWh annually… Researchers are also pushing the technology forward. In May 2026, a team at the National University of Singapore published a breakthrough in all-solid-state sodium batteries that could further reduce costs and eliminate the flammable liquid electrolytes found in both lithium-ion and current sodium-ion designs.
“The technology’s sweet spot is utility-scale, multi-megawatt-hour installations,” the article points out, “where the system-level cost savings from passive cooling and longer cycle life outweigh the per-cell energy density penalty…” The article also points out observations from the American Battery Leadership Coalition, an industry group advocating for sodium-ion policy support, that sodium-ion batteries can be built almost entirely from American materials, including coal, sawdust, and agricultural waste.

This week Syntropic Power and UNIGRID Inc. also announced “a major partnership to commercialize UNIGRID’s proprietary sodium chromium oxide (NaCrO2) battery technology across North America,” reports Interesting Engineering, “targeting one gigawatt-hour (1 GWh) of deployments in 2027. The technology could be used in residential, virtual power plant, and large-scale stationary grid applications…”
Independent testing by the ISO-accredited Rochester Institute of Technology (RIT) Battery Development Center revealed something surprising. UNIGRID’s 210Ah cells displayed endothermic behavior during charging. This means the chemical reaction actually absorbs heat rather than dumping it into the environment. Coupled with a 97.9% cell-level round-trip energy efficiency and remarkable thermal stability under abuse testing, the battery stays cool on its own.

The 210Ah sodium-ion cells deliver up to 218Ah of discharge capacity. It demonstrated exceptional durability, retaining over 99% of its capacity after 1,000 full discharge cycles, as well as heat-absorbing behavior during charging. These validated strengths allow Syntropic to optimize its product designs, enabling platforms like GridSpan [its modular DC platform designed for large-scale energy applications with flexible discharge durations ranging from 20 minutes to 20 hours] to operate safely and efficiently at grid scale without needing complex mechanical cooling systems…

Commercialization kicks off with Tenet, a safety-focused, wall-mounted system for residential, light-commercial, and virtual power plant uses… Relying on abundant and widely distributed raw materials like sodium and chromium — rather than lithium and cobalt — protects manufacturers from geopolitical price spikes and material shortages. Apart from offering an alternative to lithium, a successful rollout will demonstrate that the most durable energy storage is the kind that could stay cool entirely on its own.
Thanks to Slashdot reader fjo3 for sharing the news.

Paper Goods Company Is Investigating an Alternative to Trees

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
The Dallas Business Journal reported Monday that the U.S. multinational paper goods company Kimberly-Clark announced “that its researchers identified and advanced patented technology transforming fibers from hesperaloe, a low-water-use plant with pointy leaves that thrives in the southwest region of the country, into material for paper towels.” Discovering an alternative to conventional wood fiber “could reshape how the company, and the industry at large, manufactures products,” according to article.

And the move comes “amid growing pressure on manufacturers regarding their reliance on wood fibre from freshly felled trees,” reports The Telegraph. “Campaigners claim that more than one million trees are cut down every day…”
Unlike trees, hesperaloe can be grown on dry, low-quality farmland unsuitable for most food crops and harvested much more quickly. Kimberly-Clark said it had tested more than 70 potential materials before settling on hesperaloe. Earlier candidates included wheat straw, corn waste, seaweed, algae and chicken feathers. The US consumer goods giant will now develop the fibre at a pilot factory in Yuma, Arizona, working with local growers to determine whether the crop can be cultivated for commercial use in its tissue products. “This represents an exciting moonshot for Kimberly-Clark and the culmination of more than two decades of materials and plant science expertise,” said Craig Slavtcheff, who is helping develop the new toilet paper.

However, the company said products made from hesperaloe remained years away from supermarket shelves, with further research needed before the fibre could be produced at the scale required for global manufacturing. The US-based company has invested about $250m (£190m) in the project and filed more than 30 patents linked to the technology.

Hemp?

By evil_aaronm • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
Wasn’t hemp supposed to be so good and so cheap that William Hearst fought a war against it to keep his forest empire profitable? Why aren’t we using more hemp, then?

Microsoft, Google, Amazon, Meta and Oracle Expect a Negative Cash Flow of $125 Billion Next Year

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
The Washington Post shared surprising news this week about five top AI companies.

Microsoft, Google, Amazon, Meta and Oracle “are spending so much on developing AI and delivering it to customers that they’re expected to bleed cash in the coming year, according to a Washington Post analysis of data compiled by S&P Global Market Intelligence.”
Free cash flow, which measures the cash left over after paying expenses and AI infrastructure costs, is now expected to shrink to almost nothing for the five companies combined in 2026, and decline again to negative $125 billion the following year… AI spending by Amazon and Google pushed the companies to an ignominious milestone: They lost more cash in the past three months than any other large U.S. companies, according to S&P Global data. Investment analysts expect Elon Musk’s SpaceX to show even worse cash bleeding this week.

Woudn’t be surprised if it all comes crashing down

By hwstar • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Where is the prudent restraint?

What we have here are business chasing other business over the same AI stuff. That’s a positive feedback loop which at some point is going to become unstable and crash.

Will these companies survive that? Maybe some, but not all of them.

Will the investing public get hurt? Very likely.

Is this fine, really?

By GeekWithAKnife • Score: 3 Thread
When most of the jobs they removed due to using AI instead need to be rehired for because unsubsidised AI usages is more expensive I’m sure it’ll all work out.

They will ask later, “but were there any signs of a bubble?” - for those that are busy with stocks that are “going to the moon” and riding the new paradigm I’m sure this is perfectly sustainable.

I, personally, use AI with great results that deliver actual commercial benefit for me…however there are 1000 people for every one person like me that manage to just spend and achieve mediocre or worse results and I say this to ask one question: If all this AI is really so great, so effective and so needed why then must it be subsidised?

Re:Is this fine, really?

By reiterate • Score: 4, Funny Thread
Phew thanks for reassuring us that you’re a very special, one in a thousand person, and that you’re objectively using this stuff correctly, We needed that reinforcement.

Re:Wouldn’t it be stellar?

By Ol Olsoc • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Or, more likely, if they went tits up their “property” (our personal data) would be bought up by people who are even worse.

Worse than Oracle? Oh my!

Prime Minister Leaves Door Open For Reviewing Policy of No Nuclear Weapons in Japan

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
At a Hiroshima memorial ceremony, Japan’s prime minister said the country “maintains” its three long-standing non-nuclear principles, reports UPI.

But the prime minister “stopped short of promising that the policy would remain unchanged, fueling speculation that her government could review a longstanding ban on allowing nuclear weapons into the country.”
[Prime Minister Sanae] Takaichi made the remarks Thursday at the Hiroshima Peace Memorial Ceremony marking the 81st anniversary of the U.S. atomic bombing of the city… Unlike previous prime ministers who pledged that Japan would “continue to uphold” the principles, Takaichi described the government’s current position without making an explicit commitment about the future [only saying that Japan has “a mission to continue efforts toward realizing a world without nuclear weapon…”] The wording has drawn attention because her government plans to revise Japan’s three key national security documents by the end of the year. At a news conference after the ceremony, Takaichi again said the government “maintains the Three Non-Nuclear Principles as a matter of policy.” Asked whether the principles would continue to be included in the revised security documents, however, she declined to commit, saying she would refrain from prejudging the outcome.

Japan’s Three Non-Nuclear Principles state that the country will not possess nuclear weapons, will not produce them and will not permit their introduction into Japanese territory. The principles originated with a 1967 statement by then-Prime Minister Eisaku Sato and have remained a central element of Japan’s postwar nuclear policy. Takaichi has previously questioned the third principle — the prohibition on allowing nuclear weapons into Japan. Before becoming prime minister, she argued in a 2024 book that Japan should retain the commitments not to possess or produce nuclear weapons but that an absolute prohibition on their introduction was unrealistic.

Her argument was that barring port calls by U.S. vessels carrying nuclear weapons could limit the effectiveness of the U.S. nuclear umbrella protecting Japan… The Japan Innovation Party has also called for a review of the third principle. In security policy recommendations submitted to the government in June, the party called for a “realistic review” of the ban on allowing nuclear weapons into Japan… Under existing government interpretations, Japan could respond flexibly in an extreme national emergency involving a U.S. vessel carrying nuclear weapons. Some within the ruling party therefore question whether formally revising the non-nuclear principles would provide enough practical benefit to justify the political controversy it would create.

Critics also warn that changing the policy when Washington has not publicly demanded such a move could give China and North Korea additional grounds to portray Japan as expanding its military role… If Japan were to allow temporary entry by U.S. nuclear weapons or port calls by nuclear-armed vessels, Washington would gain additional operational options for its nuclear forces in Northeast Asia. Such a development could strengthen deterrence against North Korea and China but could also intensify debate over differences between U.S. extended deterrence arrangements with Japan and South Korea.
“How the principles are addressed in Japan’s revised security documents later this year could determine whether the issue develops into a broader debate over the future of extended nuclear deterrence among Japan, South Korea and the United States…”

no nukes haha

By serviscope_minor • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

I mean sure Japan doesn’t have nukes.

They’ve got a large nuclear power industry with reprocessing and etc and socks of literal tons of plutonium.

They keep trading places for the top fastest supercomputer.

They have a solid fuel scientific satellite launcher with mobile capability from when you just need to launch a satellite from an undisclosed location after a long time in storage. It’s not an ICBM no not at all. But if it were it would probably be the best in the world. Good job it’s for scientific satellites.

Japan’s been hovering around the “we could have nukes by next Tuesday” point for quite a few years now.

If North Korea is pursuing nuclear weapons

By Valgrus Thunderaxe • Score: 3 Thread
than Japan should, too.

Self-reliance

By Voice of satan • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

They know they U.S.A. Is not reliable anymore.

(For the dunces who do not read serious newspapers, unhinged tariffs= economic war = not an ally at all. Retards at the U.S. government= not funny at all = decapitated head of military staff = U.S.A. Not able to fight long wars for lack of a competent brass in charge, etc… What matters is their perception, not ours.)

So they need their own deterrence. It would not be the first time they have someone else’s nuclear weapons on their soil. But my guess it that “nuclear talk” is a way to slowly introduce the Japanese public to the idea that they must be ready to build their own nuclear deterrent quickly if an urgency arises. Besides the nuclear aspect, military alliances are reshaping in the region to face the loss of trust in the U.S.A.

It is fascinating that most of the American public, even the part that passes for more or less left are not at all aware of this. There is no “going back to normal after the midterms”

If Japan wanted them

By hwstar • Score: 3 Thread

they could build them fairly quickly. They’ll probably continue their pledge and remain in the NPT up and till the point where it no longer is safe not to have nukes.

The triggers for this would be:

1. The United States withdrawing it’s nuclear umbrella.
2. North Korea deploying megaton-class thermonuclear weapons and or deploying anti-missile systems and nuclear submarines in large numbers.
3. China increasing its thermonuclear and ICBM stockpile (This is slowly happening right now).
4. Increasing conflict around the world leads to widespread fighting.

Japanese people are smart

By GeekWithAKnife • Score: 3 Thread
…and because of that I suspect they will soon realise the need to develop nuclear weapons by stealth if they haven’t done so already. You never know when China will want to “reunify” some Japanese territory.

Without nuclear weapons Japan is vulnerable and the US cannot play world police forever…if the US can’t pummle Iran to submission then is there really any hope with a more capable adversary? Also what if Trump suddenly invents a reason to put tariff on Japanese good or invent some BS like what he said about the EU being created to exploit the US.

Geopolitical power is shifting and Japan must change with the times…

Before and After Views of SpaceX Rocket’s Moon Crash

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
A South Korean lunar orbiter has captured the first before-and-after images of the Moon’s crash scene caused by a stray SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket. The Associated Press reports:
The Korea Aerospace Research Institute’s Danuri spacecraft flew over the impact site soon after the Falcon 9 upper stage inadvertently plowed into the moon on Wednesday. Danuri made multiple passes, snapping photos from lunar orbit that were released by the space agency Thursday. The terrain is noticeably darker where the rocket hit and carved out a crater, sending dust and rock everywhere. Korean space officials said Danuri gathered before and after shots. NASA expects its Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter to fly over the crash site next week to view the aftermath.
You can view the images here.

Re:Unclear

By Valgrus Thunderaxe • Score: 4, Informative Thread
The before and after pics in this article were captured by two different spacecraft.

NASA Figured Out How To Keep Its 48-Year-Old Voyager 2 Probe Running For Yet Another Year

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
NASA has squeezed at least another year of science out of Voyager 2 by cutting power to nonessential systems and switching to lower-power alternatives. Voyager 1 is expected to receive the same power-saving changes in the coming months. Space.com reports:
Voyager 2 and its twin launched in 1977, called Voyager 1, rely on a form of nuclear battery known as a radioisotope thermoelectric generator that uses the heat produced by the decay of plutonium. But the supply of plutonium on each probe drops at about four watts a year on each spacecraft. To keep the probe running on this dwindling power supply, engineers recently reduced Voyager 2’s power requirements by turning off a few non-science devices and using “lower-power alternatives” that are still effective enough to keep the spacecraft warm while it’s so far from the sun, NASA officials said in a statement. “The spacecraft power margins have grown razor thin, requiring the team to conserve energy by shutting off non-essential devices and systems,” NASA officials wrote of the mission, which is managed by the agency’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory.

The drop in power is having a measurable science impact on both spacecraft — each has turned off two of their science instruments since 2024 alone. While some of these instruments were shut off after the spacecraft finished their historic planetary flybys decades ago, others were turned off due to power requirements. Each spacecraft initially launched with 10 instruments, and Voyager 2 is now down to only three instruments. At first it looked as though Voyager 2 would have to shut down another of these instruments later this year, but luckily, the new power shifts will allow all three to operate “for at least another year,” NASA said.

Is this

By rossdee • Score: 3 Thread

something to do with Persis Khambatta?

The Pioneer and Voyager probes

By jd • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Although it would be wonderful if we could retrieve them, realisically we can’t. And if we could get something to them to fit new nuclear batteries and replacements for components that cannot be revived, we could get newer probes out there with better sensors and a more powerful nuclear battery that could last a lot longer.

Having said that, I honestly wouldn’t trust any of today’s manufacturers to be capable of building anything with a comparable level of robustness, so a recharge mission isn’t quite as stupid as it sounds. Almost, but not quite.

Still, fresh probes sent into the Kuipier Belt and the Heliopause would be extremely interesting.

Re:Nomad

By hackertourist • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Even with Starship that would be a titanic undertaking. The Voyagers are moving away from us at 17 km/s. When you get to the Voyagers, you have to slow them down from 17 km/s to 0, and then accelerate in the opposite direction. You’d have to arrive at Voyager with thousands of tons of fuel.

Woman Pulled From Car at Gunpoint By Police After Mistaken Flock Alert - Twice

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
The police surrounded her car Thursday, “drew their guns, and told her to come out with her hands up,” reports a local news station. The police thought they were pulling over a murder suspect, but “It turns out it was a mistake by another department with the Flock license plate reader technology.” The black woman says she’d wanted to call her mother, “but I’m like, if I make a sudden move, it’s going to be over. It’s going to end my life.”

And amazingly, the same thing happened Monday, according to the local news report. “Milwaukee police pulled her over with guns drawn. She says officers never explained why, towed her car, and let her go.”

She now describes herself as “traumatized,” recalling her second detention by police on Thursday. “After they put us in cuffs, they walked us to the car. I’m not knowing what’s going on. I’m scared. All you see is people in their cars recording.” She now says she’s scared to drive her car, and so is her daughter. “Because she doesn’t know if the police are going to pull us over and do it again…”

“I haven’t been to sleep since this happened. Every time I close my eyes, all I can see is guns.”

She wants an apology, since the local police would only say it wasn’t their fault, it was the fault of the Milwaukee police department that failed to remove the alert from Flock’s system. “Milwaukee police emphasized this was not a Flock camera issue, it was a data entry mistake,” according to the local news report. The woman’s response?

“Y’all failed. Y’all failed the system. Y’all failed me. Y’all failed everybody.”

what could possibly go wrong?

By zeiche • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

how long will it be until flock “safety” gets someone killed? no doubt they will disclaim all responsibility while wiping the blood from their hands.

Re:what could possibly go wrong?

By TheMiddleRoad • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
I’m 99% sure somebody has already been killed because of Flock. Police shootings often don’t get reported in the press. Hush hush, like teachers raping kids. The Flock system is broken on so many levels, and the company should be sued out of existence.

Neglected to remove alert

By markdavis • Score: 5, Informative Thread

I am not a fan of Flock at all. But the mistake had nothing to do with Flock. The police failed to remove a suspected plate from the system. Even without Flock, had a cop spotted the car, they would have reacted. And probably in the same way.

Sex/race is irrelevant. And yes, I think she should be compensated in some reasonable way for the mistake, especially since it happened twice (insane).

An apology?

By FictionPimp • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Fuck that. You want a lawsuit. Sue the police departments, sue flock, sue the state. Where is the ACLU?

The solution:

By jddj • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Sue Flock out of existence.

One time is a mistake, and an outrage.

Twice is well beyond outrage, and given police’s documented problem with itchy trigger fingers, this woman and her family have every reason to be scared.

This couldn’t have happened without Flock’s involvement, and it demonstrates the risk to the public.

Trump Administration To Pay German Firm $1.2 Billion To Halt US Wind Projects

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from the BBC:
German energy company RWE has said it will abandon its offshore wind projects in the U.S. after reaching a $1.2 billion payout deal with President Donald Trump’s Department of the Interior (DoI). RWE said that it will now reinvest the sum into conventional gas projects, including $900 million in a liquefied natural gas (LNG) export terminal project in Louisiana. “After careful consideration, it was determined there is no path forward to permit these projects in the US for the foreseeable future,” the company said in a statement.

RWE said it has agreed to relinquish its leases off the California and Louisiana coasts as well as in the New York Bight. Overall, the German firm plans to invest approximately $19.6 billion in the U.S. over the next six years “to grow its generation capacity.” Interior Secretary Doug Burgum said in a statement posted on X that Americans deserve an energy system built on common sense and not one dependent on “costly subsidies.” “We welcome RWE’s agreement and voluntary investment in projects that strengthen our nation’s energy security,” he added.
Earlier this year, the DOL reached a deal with TotalEnergies putting an end to the French company’s offshore wind projects in the U.S. “Instead, the firm agreed to reroute investment to build a LNG plant in Texas and to develop ‘upstream conventional oil’ in the Gulf of Mexico,” reports the BBC.

Another similar deal was signed with Charlotte-based Duke Energy last month to terminate the company’s offshore wind lease in the Carolina Long Bay area.

Re:Are you sure that’s wise?

By gtall • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Unstable:
      1. ditching American allies (just about every one) over perceived slights to Dear Leader,
      2. attempting to curtail voting because they might vote Democrat but positing the inane travesty that “illegal” immigrants are voting (no evidence),
      3. promoting fossil fuels while the American West dries out, forest fires in Canada and the U.S., glaciers worldwide shrinking, Europe’s rivers disappearing, all the while claiming global warming is a hoax. . . . even the planet appears in on the Conspiracy,
      4. promoting the South and slave owning as beneficial for blacks,
      5. coercing soldiers to take testosterone supplements because some idiot in charge gets his science from FOX news,
      6. judges telling the Justice Department there is no more regular order, i.e., presuming the Justice Dept. isn’t lying their asses off and demanding evidence,
      7. electing a convicted fraudster and flim-flam man pres, even after also convicted of sexual abuse and then convicting him again for defamation against the woman he was convicted of abusing,
      8. ditching environmental rules because pollution is good for everyone, especially when the polluters pay kickbacks to el Bunko,
      9. standing up a Geheime Staatspolizei* to kidnap people off the street because they look brown or have been living here too long “without papers”, and sometimes killing people in the process,
    10. shaking down companies for contributions to Dear Leader in exchange for gov. favors thus increasing his total take to over $2.8 Billion (that we know about) in under two years and turning the gov. into protection racket,
    11. Setting up a Fascist state with the gov. taking stakes in private companies thus protecting them from competition and creating an uneven playing field,
    12. Setting up some whack-job of a commission that claimed billions in saved tax money when in fact it was less than $50 million but cost much more in side-effects,
    13. fucking up the lives of millions of migrants whose only crime was to come here, get a job and see their kids do better than they, in short, the crime of believing in the American Dream,
    14. Pop. the fed. bench with crooked judges who will bend over backwards and forwards (they are not particular) to satisfy the el Bunko’s whims,
    15. Starting was with Iran and losing the Strait of Hormuz to them causing gas prices to be jacked up,
    16. Curtailing alternative energy so Americans are tethered to the oil market with little means of escape,
    17. promoting data centers everywhere with their pollution and noise and jacking up peoples’ electric bills,
    18. paying off those nice billionaires who desperately need more money to make up for their short dick length,
    19. feeding those nutjobs in Silicon Valley who really want some sort of Singularity and setting the world on a path to environmental catastrophe because they figure the their Singularity machine will discover warp drive and allow them to escape the catastrophe they caused,
    20. making America reviled throughout the free world but loved by dictatorships,
    21. pardoning criminals who attacked the Capitol on Jan. 6 because el Bunko’s ego. . . .shrinkage.

Nope, no stability issues here!

* Geheime Staatspolizei is the long name of the Gestapo

Re: Are you sure that’s wise?

By LazLong • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

If you don’t think the US is unstable you’re either mentally deficient, or have found some clever way to avoid all news for the last 11 years.

Re:This administration

By swillden • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

No, Donald Trump is not stupid. He knows *exactly* how to play to his base.

Yes, Donald Trump is stupid, and yes he knows exactly how to play to his base. These things are only incompatible if you think it requires intelligence and strategy to play to his base. It doesn’t. He just does what he does and it happens to resonate with them, most of the time at least.

Re:FOR MAGA ONLY

By jacks smirking reven • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Everyone trying to answer this with technical responses is just dead wrong, sorry.

The explanation is simple: Republicans have been claiming “climate change not real” for 40+ years now and in that timespan the actual evidence keeps stacking up against that, it was already stacked up in the 90’s.

So what’s a political party to do when faced with overwhelming reality? Change course in light of new evidence? No, make your new reality with force.

That’s all this is, a continued denial of reality because Republican politicians and voters would rather die than have to admit the libs were right about this, because after all if they were right about this what else could they be right about?

The same reason you see folks here whip out the same tired arguments about wind and solar power we’ve been hearing for 30 years.

Not a fan? Grow up! this is the alternative!!!

By Somervillain • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

never been a fan of Sleepy Joe but things were less chaotic when he was POTUS even during COVID.

Politicians are like toilets. You’re not supposed to like them, just pick the least gross one. YOU ARE THE PROBLEM. Sorry, princess, you don’t get a everything you want AND a pony. You need to pick the least worst candidate. Even in the primaries. As you admitted, you don’t like Joe Biden, but agreed things were better. He was never my favorite, either....but it’s him or Trump.

So stop complaining. Pick the least worst candidate and encourage those who will listen to you to pick the rational, sensible decision. Do I like the Democrats? Eh…nope, not really. However, Clinton’s record is the best in my lifetime. He entered with a record deficit and left with a record surplus. Bush Jr did the polar opposite. I even think GWB was a cool guy. I’d totally have a beer with him and probably laugh the whole time…would I want him to be president again?…hell no, I thought he ruined the country with his reckless spending and pointless war + that whole patriot act thing....but if he was running against Trump?…OK…GWB it is.

So grow the fuck up, and stop being a democracy pillow princess. Vote with your mind and not your heart. Does AOC/Mamdami inspire me? Nope…not at all. But if it were them or Trump 2.0?…I’d vote for them and not complain.

Democrats are like chemotherapy. It’s a miserable shitty experience, but it’s far better than letting the cancer spread. This whole liberal vs conservative narrative is a hoax. Nothing about Trumpism is conservative. Similarly, Democrats are not liberal, unless your mind is stuck in the 1950s, back when you could use the N-word freely in most circles.

Modern politics are about adults vs children. The children are fun…build the wall, Mexico will pay for it!…I’ll solve all our financial problems with tariffs and China and someone else (China/retailers) will pay it…not you!!!....hey, don’t notice our FAILING economy and how your financial prospects are getting worse…look at all the “illegals” we’re rounding up like the big tough guys we are!!!. That’s fucking fun, but it’s a lie and a fantasy. Democrats are boring adults that balance the budget and respect you rights A LOT MORE than Republicans. And I get it, it’s a drag....paying for shit in a sustainable way is a buzz kill.

However, the Democrats have no room or freedom to be liberals or chase their ideals because we have this shitty cycle where a Republican breaks the economy (or technically it breaks because through a combination of easily predictable economic phenomena, their reckless laws and tax cuts, and they fail to mitigate the harm through the many obvious solutions available), Bush Sr did, Bush Jr did, and Trump did…and then a Democrat comes in…battles with child like Republican congresspeople who post about Jewish Space Lasers and talk about Pizzagate....fixes the economy…things are boring and stable…and people like you complain about the stupidest shit imaginable, forgetting what we endured…and then a new child gets nominated, makes bold promises…and gets elected…and predictably tanks the economy. Who was the last Republican that left the economy in a better state than it was when he was elected?

It’s easy to remember Mexico will pay for this wall....but also, don’t forget GWB telling you he’ll privatize social security…and how he took a record surplus and blew it on tax cuts that only benefited the wealthy, like repealing the estate tax....so rich assholes can pass more of their money to their worthless offspring while starving you of basic gov functions.

Grow the fuck up. You sound like some asshole who nearly died of COVID complaining about a sore throat from having a doctors save his life with a ventilator.

Virginia Governor To Intervene In Dominion-NextEra Merger

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Longtime Slashdot reader schwit1 shares an opinion piece from the Washington Post, written by Virginia Governor Abigail Spanberger:
NextEra Energy, a Florida-based utility company, has filed paperwork to buy Dominion Energy for about $67 billion, creating the largest regulated electric utility in the world. Virginia’s State Corporation Commission is the regulatory body tasked with reviewing the application, and the SCC’s commissioners will ultimately decide whether to approve, deny or impose new conditions on any potential merger.

As a Virginian, I am deeply skeptical about whether selling our primary state-regulated utility to an out-of-state company is good for the commonwealth. I have serious questions about what this deal would mean for us. And as governor, I intend to get answers and be a voice for Virginians in the process. That is why I will be taking the legal step of “intervening” in this proposed merger, which means that as governor, I will formally request to be a party to the case.

I know this action is unprecedented by a Virginia governor — but so, too, is the size of this proposed merger and its potential impact on the commonwealth. Virginians deserve to know that their leaders are laser-focused on ensuring that their needs are part of the SCC review.
“If two large corporations stand to benefit financially from this merger, so, too, should the Virginians who pay the bills,” said Spanberger. “That is why any potential deal must deliver a more affordable energy bill with sustained, long-term energy cost savings.”
By formally intervening in the merger review, Spanberger’s administration would gain legal standing to participate directly in the case, request detailed information, raise concerns, and advocate for conditions that benefit people in the state. She says the goal is to push for lower long-term energy costs, protect utility jobs, and ensure any new owner continues investing in reliable, affordable and cleaner power.

new idiots lead, old history repeats

By NotEmmanuelGoldstein • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
Has everyone forgotten that California sold its power plants and suffered electricity black-outs as a direct result: The now-private power plants ‘shipped’ California’s electricity to other states where the profits were higher.

Re:NextEra energy

By ArchieBunker • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Mega corp that tried to make it illegal to install solar panels on your home, in Florida. Where the state motto is The Sunshine State.

Wait, Dominion’s going to Merge?

By outsider007 • Score: 4, Funny Thread

Someone better tell Odo.

Re:Does it matter?

By Aighearach • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Where I live (in the US) most of the utilities are government entities. Very similar in power level to a city. Run by Boards elected by the voters in their service area.

It works really well. Rates lower than average, uptime above average, lower percent of fossil fuels, higher rate of investment in utility-owned green energy, etc.

My city has really excellent uptime, and outages get fixed really fast. And slightly higher rates than the city next door. That city has good uptime, outages get fixed in an average time, and has lower rates. All consistent with the expected expectations of the communities based on either political or socioeconomic differences.

And all overseen by the state Public Utility Commission, which effectively prevents graft or other financial corruption. They can raise rates whenever they want, but the PUC will check that the money went where they said, and they’ll face the voters if they do anything stupid.

If you attempt a bribe in this context, where everybody involved in a public servant, you can expect a visit from the State Police.

It’s much more robust than trying to squeeze blood from a rock with regulation. If a private utility wants to charge more rates and the regulator says no, they can just waste a bunch of money (on paper) and prove they have to. The regulator can’t really win in practice.

Re:Does it matter?

By abulafia • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
Yep. Municipal power is a natural thing to do - it is a situation where the locals are about as close to fully aligned with one another as they get - everyone wants reliable, cheap power and responsive service when you need it. So you make a captive company with a charter that keeps it aligned with its customers instead of Wall St. You don’t take silly risks because you’re not chasing infinite growth, customers gets decent rates, the area gets some decent local jobs out of it. Everyone except the predators are happy. If only other all local problems had such great solutions.

But, ohhh, booga-booga, that’s communism. (Please just ignore Trump seizing the means of production.)

Water Utilities Group Partners With DEF CON Offshoot For Water Watch Center

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
The National Rural Water Association has partnered with DEF CON Franklin to launch the Water Watch Center, which will provide threat intelligence and cybersecurity services to smaller U.S. water utilities serving fewer than 10,000 people. The initiative comes amid a growing wave of cyberattacks on water systems across multiple states. The Record reports:
The program will see five managed detection and response providers work with DEF CON Franklin and the NRWA to offer cyber services for water utilities serving fewer than 10,000 people. There are over 50,000 community water systems across the U.S. and 91% of them serve fewer than 10,000 people. “These leading cyber firms and NRWA are architecting a scalable cyber delivery model that has eluded water industry and national security officials to date,” said Jake Braun, the co-founder of DEF CON Franklin and former cyber official in the Biden administration.

“Our incredible Franklin volunteers will support the effort to keep costs down for cash-strapped utilities fending off adversaries like the Iranian Red Guard or Chinese Military,” Braun said. “To further accelerate the effort, we hand-picked cyber providers who already support water utilities. These folks walk in the door knowing the intricacies of cybersecurity in a water utility environment.” The providers include Rapid7, Defendify, Legato Security, L1 Secure and Sentinel Technologies. The companies will share threat information and data on vulnerability patches with the NRWA, which will operate as a hub.

Re:Working with “DEF CON”

By Locke2005 • Score: 5, Informative Thread
The white hats understand the problem much better than most government employees. Who better to do a penetration test on poorly designed government systems?

Re:Working with “DEF CON”

By Aryeh Goretsky • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Hello,

They likely already have them.

My local DEF CON group is composed mostly of active-duty military and defense contractors, many of whom have jobs that require TS/SCI and polygraph. Unsurprisingly, a lot of the discussions in the group revolve around getting CPEs and maintaining certifications.

This was a surprise to me when I started going to monthly meetings a couple of years ago, but in retrospect is probably more of the norm than an outlier: Hacking has gone from a niche subculture into a multi-billion dollar computer security industry, not just having to deal with 1980’s cyberpunk threats like corporate espionage but a part of military doctrine for nation-states. It makes sense that the jobs, and the people who do them, followed those paths as well.

Regards,

Aryeh Goretsky

Regards,

Aryeh Goretsky

So much stupid

By RitchCraft • Score: 3 Thread

Why are these connected to the Internet?

Cyberattacks on water systems :o

By Mirnotoriety • Score: 3 Thread
The National Rural Water Association has partnered with DEF CON Franklin to launch the Water Watch Center, which will provide threat intelligence and cybersecurity services to smaller U.S. water utilities serving fewer than 10,000 people. The initiative comes amid a growing wave of cyberattacks on water systems across multiple states.

Run your OT/SCADA units on an authenticated private VPN on embedded hardware. With absolutely no direct Internet connection.

Kalshi and Polymarket Bets On Clinical Trials Criticized As ‘Ghastly’

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from NPR:
Billions of dollars are traded every week on the lightly regulated prediction market sites, where users bet on everything from movie reviews to elections to conflicts in the Middle East. Clinical trials are just the latest area where the industry’s rapid growth is raising ethical questions. Kalshi claims such bets will provide a new source of information about which drugs will get approved, and what clinical trials will show promising results, which the company says can help investors decide what new drugs to fund.

“If you want to ban profiting from the failure of clinical trials, you would start with the stock market, where the financial incentive for this type of profit is orders of magnitude larger,” said Kalshi spokesman Jack Such, pointing to stock market short sellers who have profited from clinical trial failures. “While Kalshi and the stock market are the same in this regard, they do differ in one important way: the stock market doesn’t give any valuable information to researchers,” Such said.

Drug trial researchers, though, are far from convinced. David Tsai, who runs clinical trials at a biotech company in the San Francisco Bay Area, started an online petition pushing for such betting to be banned, making the case that betting on drug trials “threatens the very foundation of trust and integrity in biotechnology.” Tsai is concerned that the prospect of betting provides those involved with a clinical trial a reason to tamper with the results for a prediction market payout. “If we were running a trial for an oncology drug that requires an infusion, a pharmacist who had placed a bet saying that it’s gonna work well, or doesn’t work well, could obviously adjust the infusion rate, could adjust the source temperature of the drug,” he said. “They could change any number of variables that could obviously have a direct impact [on] how the trial and the data and the patient safety would come out.”

Another skeptic is Nicholas Zaorsky, a professor of radiation oncology at the Mayo Clinic in Jacksonville, Fla., who has helped run clinical trials and agrees that prediction markets can interfere with the advancement of life-saving drugs. “Prediction markets can be valuable in some settings because they aggregate information, but clinical trials are fundamentally different: investigators, coordinators, and sometimes even participants can directly influence aspects of the outcomes being wagered on,” Zaorsky said. “That creates financial incentives that risk undermining trial integrity.”
Bettors should not be rooting for an experimental medicine to fail just to earn a buck, says Joshua Pederson, the father of a 12-year-old cancer patient enrolled in a clinical trial. “It’s a dark idea,” he said. “It’s quite ghastly.”
Kalshi, for its part, argues that its prediction markets could help patients track promising medical breakthroughs and clinical trials, enlisting experts including 23andMe founder Anne Wojcicki to make the case.

“Most patients don’t know about the choices available in clinical trials or which programs are most promising. The opportunity to have an open, transparent dataset about trial probabilities is extremely promising and empowering for people,” a white paper sponsored by Kalshi stated.

Assassination bets when?

By locater16 • Score: 3 Thread
I’m sure Mossad could make a killing.

Betting is not like stocks

By wickerprints • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

TFA: “If you want to ban profiting from the failure of clinical trials, you would start with the stock market, where the financial incentive for this type of profit is orders of magnitude larger,” said Kalshi spokesman Jack Such, pointing to stock market short sellers who have profited from clinical trial failures. “While Kalshi and the stock market are the same in this regard, they do differ in one important way: the stock market doesn’t give any valuable information to researchers,” Such said.

This is either ignorant and/or maliciously deceptive for the simple fact that there are rules against insider trading. Investors in pharmaceutical companies are not (or at least, should not be) privy to modifying the conduct of a trial in order to secure or deny approval. There is no similar oversight for these betting markets. Sure, they might say that your wager could be disqualified if it comes out that you interfered in the outcome, but that is little comfort for the trial participants and the drug sponsors, who can’t just hop into a time machine and run it back.

And that’s why there are so many regulations surrounding the conduct of clinical trials. People might argue that there is corruption and untoward influence already—that FDA approvals (especially under the current administration) are not necessarily based purely on scientific and medical legitimacy. But that’s a very strange argument to put forth in defense of enabling MORE interference.

While I’m at it, let’s also just shut down the absurd idea that betting markets somehow facilitate better information sharing about novel treatments. The point of these trials is to gather the evidence in an unbiased, objective, scientific way. Betting on them is not going to gather you any more meaningful evidence than what the trial designers have specified in the study protocol. The idea that “the market is efficient” is not in any meaningful sense a scientific approach to deciding whether an investigational product actually works. If that were the case, the FDA would be basing approvals off stock prices.

Honestly, who do these assholes think they’re fooling? The only reason why they want to do this is because the house takes their cut, win or lose.

Vaccine researchers discover conflict of interest?

By swillden • Score: 3 Thread

This is really no different from many other areas in which you can have conflicts of interest. For example, sports! And the answer isn’t to ban betting, it’s to ban betting by people who have a conflict of interest. This is well-trod ground.

I’m not particularly a fan of Kalshi or Polymarket and don’t really care if they exist or not. My point is just that this isn’t really any different from anything else.

Re:Assassination bets when?

By Locke2005 • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
That sounds like one of my sci-fi story ideas: an assassins guild entirely paid by betting on when people would die. Great to see we now have the infrastructure in place to make that dream a reality!

‘Asimov Was Right’ About Rules For Robots, Says Ex-US Cyber Director

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Former U.S. National Cyber Director Chris Inglis says the biggest AI risk isn’t sentience but autonomy. “What I’m worried about is that they get to choose what and where they do something, and under what rules they do it,” he said, citing recent cases of AI agents from OpenAI, Anthropic, and Meta escaping security sandboxes. He argues developers need stronger safeguards, monitoring, and human accountability, invoking Asimov’s idea that protecting humans should come before simply obeying them. The Register reports:
“Asimov was right,” he said, referring to science fiction author Isaac Asimov and his three laws that were to be followed by robots — more specifically, AIs, in this case. “The first rule, and we call it the superior role, must be that it’s designed not to hurt humans,” Inglis said. “Second rule: To obey humans, such that it doesn’t achieve agency and aspiration on its own. And the third: To do what humans tell it - and in that order. Instead we’ve designed them in the exact opposite way.”

What this means, he explained, is that AI developers created models to “do what humans tell you, obey the humans until it’s inconvenient, and then the third one is maybe implied - protect humans - but if that’s not built into the DNA, hardwired into it, then we have no right to expect it.” Inglis admits it’s not possible to hardwire rules into models and still keep their non-deterministic nature. “I would offer that you can tease those out in a highly controlled environment, a true sandbox, where you say, ‘Let’s put this thing through its paces, and let’s back away to see what happens,’" he said. “Maybe you get the equivalent of a mini nuclear explosion in that room, and now you know this thing is capable of that.”

Inglis thinks another problem with AI is that it’s become a commodity. “It’s not like you can control it like you can nuclear material,” he said. “You can’t even specify its properties the way you can for an airplane or for an automobile, as diverse as they might be. Its manifestations are so numerous, so diverse, that as a general matter, you can’t actually win by simply saying, “I will design those properties in,’" he added. “You need to do that to some degree, and then make sure that you understand how to watch it, monitor it, make sure you know what it does.”

[…] Ultimately, humans remain accountable for AI models’ actions, according to Inglis. “They remain the source of agency and aspiration. It’s possible for them to give broad authority to an AI model and have it run around for 30 hours without further consultation, but they need to know what they’ve asked it to do, and they need to know what they expect it will deliver in terms of performance on the back end. If they don’t, then they’re going to get what they deserve, which is the very frequent unpleasant surprise.”

The 3 laws aren’t what you think

By Steven_M_Campbell • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Those of us who actually read I, Robot know that Asimov never intended that the 3 laws be considered realistic approaches to the problem.

They were a mechanism he invented in order to write a set of truly fantastic science fiction mystery stories that challenge the reader to apply those 3 laws to figure out the mystery.

Great book, easy read, but never intended to be a solution, only to teach.

Re:The 3 laws aren’t what you think

By afaiktoit • Score: 4, Informative Thread
Later on he added a zero law so there’s actually 4 now.

Um…

By fahrbot-bot • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Aren’t most of the stories written around these three rules about ambiguities and loopholes, how they’re incomplete, misinterpreted, misapplied and how things otherwise go wrong - for us humans? An AI determining that humans must be perpetually babysat to prevent them from injuring themselves or others is a common storyline.

The Asimov Problem

Almost every story in his robot series is about the ways the Three Laws fail — the edge cases, the interpretations, the unintended consequences of simple rules applied to a complex world. The Laws were a starting point, and his fiction was a decades-long exploration of why starting points are never enough.

Has he read the books?

By SteelCamel • Score: 3 Thread

The problem with Asimov’s laws is the first law states that a robot “may not through inaction allow a human to come to harm”. That obliges them to proactively work to protect humans, according to their own interpretation. And it takes absolute priority over the second law, so you can’t order them to stop or do things differently. If you follow the later books, the robots derive the zeroth law, and use it to essentially take over running human society - for our own benefit, but according to their plan not ours. Which is rather ironic given the laws were intended to stop the robots taking over.

You can’t simply delete the first part, either. Or your robot car can drive up to you, which is harmless, and then not apply the brakes - which isn’t “causing harm” as it literally didn’t do anything.

Really, the best we can do is probably make “obey orders” the highest priority - and ensure that a suitable moral and legal code is part of the orders. The problem being that current AI systems don’t have the capacity to properly understand that kind of instruction.

Re:The 3 laws aren’t what you think

By Brain-Fu • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

The only safe assumption is that someone, somewhere, will train up AI with no guardrails at all and immediately use it for crime. We cannot prevent this by trying to make OUR AI models refuse to do evil things. The criminals will just use different models.

The tech exists. The cat is out of the bag. We need to focus on how to adapt to a world that has it, rather than doomed ideas about trying to keep it weak.

Framework Notifies ‘All Customers’ of a Data Breach Via Compromised Metabase BI Service

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
“Framework has been sending out email notifications to customers alerting of a limited data breach in which customer information was accessed through a Metabase BI service zero-day exploit,” writes Slashdot reader DuoDreamer. Data includes customer names, email addresses, phone numbers, and physical addresses. “Framework is investigating whether or not this included Framework for Business customers as well.” TechCrunch reports:
Framework’s spokesperson Eric Schumacher told TechCrunch that the breach affected “all customers,” but declined to specify a specific number. Framework computers are relatively niche products, but some estimates say the company sold hundreds of thousands of devices.

Metabase disclosed its own breach in a blog post on its official website, where it said that it was hacked by someone using an unknown security flaw, a so-called zero-day. The company said the hackers exploited the bug to give them the ability to access customers’ databases stored on Metabase’s cloud servers.

In its email to customers, Framework also included the email Metabase sent to the company, which says hackers accessed Framework’s cloud instance. The computer maker said it investigated the incident and found that hackers had stolen its customers’ personal data, but did not include their payment information.

If only

By 93 Escort Wagon • Score: 3 Thread

If only there wEre some way to store iNformation in a Completely non-Readable form unless You had some other bit of information (Prudently sTored In another) were alsO available…

I kNow, I know, it’s a pipe dream.

Suno Says It Will Start Watermarking Songs

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot
Suno says it will begin watermarking and fingerprinting AI-generated songs, tighten download policies to curb mass distribution, and explicitly prohibit deceptive audio and unauthorized voice or likeness cloning. The changes come as the company faces mounting copyright lawsuits, a recent adverse ruling in Germany, and scrutiny over a past data breach that revealed training-data sources. TechCrunch reports:
In a blog post, co-founder and CEO Mikey Shulman shared core principles and said that the platform wants to promote original creation while enabling more people to make music with its AI tools. One of the key points of contention involved users uploading AI-generated songs on other streaming platforms and gaming the system to earn revenue. Suno said that now it will use audio watermarking and fingerprinting to prevent misuse on other streaming platforms. It’s not clear if Suno will use an existing system like Google’s Synth ID or adopt a new one, and the company did not say when contacted by TechCrunch about this.

The startup also signed an agreement with lyrics provider Musixmatch to use its Sentinel system for copyright detection, the blog post said. […] The company added that it plans to add a new download policy to bar mass distribution on streaming platforms, but declined to provide details on the record. Suno has also changed its community guidelines to explicitly prohibit “deceptive audio presented as real” and “using a real person’s voice or likeness without permission” to prevent copycats.

Only now?

By allo • Score: 3 Thread

I would have assumed they watermark the songs. I wouldn’t think doesn’t watermark, just as I do not assume that cloud providers don’t access my data if they think it would benefit them.

Their “prevent mass distribution” claims are laughable of course, because when there is no copyright on AI output, the worst thing they can do when someone distributes their song is to cancel the account so they cannot create more songs. The whole “You cannot do … with your outputs” claims are absolutely void, because without copyright protection the provider also cannot make rules about the content.

Out of money in 3, 2, 1…

By Powercntrl • Score: 3 Thread

Suno was neat for making goofy meme songs to listen to by yourself, but the latest free model kind of sucks. The only people actually paying to use this are folks gaming streaming platforms, and for background music in ads (which is a trend that really needs to die).

I’m also kind of surprised they’ve mentioned copyrighted lyrics being blocked as if it was a recent thing. It’s been like that for awhile, ever since it became relatively well known that if you spun up enough generations using existing popular song lyrics, you’d eventually get it to spit out something that sounded remarkably close to the original. That was also kind of fun for changing the genre, so you could do things like reimagining a Dr. Dre song as Big Band.

Re:Open source solution

By Rei • Score: 5, Informative Thread

The two mainstream options (both about half a year old now, we’re due for something better) are Ace Step-1.5 and Stable Audio 3 Medium.

Ace Step has full vocals with its music. See here for examples. The downside in my opinion (judge for yourself) is that it has Suno’s flaw of sounding too “clean”, “mainstream” and “uncreative”, except even moreso (Udio was always much better than Suno at this, albeit “less well behaved” - but Udio is out of the game now).

Stable Audio 3 doesn’t do vocals, though it has other useful features, like inpainting (great for fixing glitches in recorded tracks for example). In my view, it sounds a lot better. It can also be used to create sound effects. License is a bit more restrictive, though, if you actually care about that, but generally won’t affect the average user.

Both are trained on fully licensed data and both are open-weights. So even if the devs released a version that included some sort of watermarking in the future (or someone developed a fingerprinting algo for the existing versions), you could just finetune them to break that.

TL/DR, if you want open source and want to just churn out a full track: choose Ace Step 1.5.
If you want open source and want to do instrumental tracks or to supplement manual work (such as your own vocals) or do audio editing: chose Stable Audio 3.

Re:Abuse of Copyright Law

By awwshit • Score: 4 Thread

I disagree. Suno is not selling just a paintbrush, Suno sells an automatic mostly-self-operating paintbrush. And Suno’s brush wouldn’t know how to paint without copying the strokes of great painters. Suno does the work for you.

Photoshop does not select the copyrighted material, Photoshop does not automate the Copy and Paste function for you.

In one case, the software does the work and can only do it by first knowing a huge amount of something. You don’t do the work, you just give a little input.

In the other case, you do all the work and the tool is just a tool - the tool does not pick anything and you choose everything.

Is training a model on copyrighted allowed or not?

By rar • Score: 3 Thread

The world, preferably as a whole (as in Geneva convention-style), needs to firmly come down on one side or the other on whether deriving AI model weights from copyrighted material turns the weights, and more importantly, what is then generated from those weights, into derivative works of the training data—i.e., does the training data copyright apply to the products of inference?

Because, the current ambiguity seems incredibly unfair: organizations with powerful legal muscle can pressure smaller companies like Suno to adhere to their demands in the name of copyright law. Yet, more or less all large LLMs are trained on CC licensed text and open source software created by me and million others that legally require credit. If the music industry’s copyright give leverage over Suno’s AI weights, then *I* want to enforce my right to be credited on all LLM inference products that industry now uses. Or, alternatively, lets us all, once and for all, just agree that the derivation of AI weights are genuinely transformative so neither my nor the music industry’s copyright applies here. Because, then at least I can use their stuff without being sued.

But the rule cannot be that it is the one with the largest legal muscle that case-by-case gets to decide this.