Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Reddit Bans 11-Year Account for GPL Game Post, Testing the EU’s DSA
  2. The Roboguard Revolution Is Short-Circuiting
  3. Taxi Drivers Rarely Die of Alzheimer’s
  4. Cyber Vulnerability Sweep Picks Up Royal Navy Drones Sending Data To China
  5. A Data Breach At Shipping Giant Ceva Logistics Is Rippling Across Banks, Retailers, Steam Gamers, and Beyond
  6. Valve Slowly Expands SteamOS Support On Non-Valve Hardware
  7. First Rival Android App Store Arrives In the US Play Store
  8. Wall Street Giants Partner With Nvidia On $500 Billion AI Financing Deal
  9. Meta’s ‘Open’ Muse Glimmer Model Can Run On a Single Computer
  10. Taiwan ‘Throttles’ Mobile Internet For First Time During Annual War Games
  11. AI Assistant Hacks Gym Website In First Known Australian Autonomous Cyber Attack
  12. Paramount Promises 30 Film-A-Year Contracts After WBD Acquisition
  13. Toxic Underground Fires Are Spreading at California Landfills
  14. How Accurate Are Flock’s AI-Powered License-Reading Cameras?
  15. Microsoft Responds to Outcry After Quietly Installing Beta ‘Photos’ App on Enterprise Machines

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Reddit Bans 11-Year Account for GPL Game Post, Testing the EU’s DSA

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Longtime Slashdot reader DF5JT writes:
On July 26, I posted a single announcement in r/backgammon: GNU Backgammon for Android, GPLv3, the first standalone backgammon engine on F-Droid. Reddit’s spam filter removed the post and permanently banned my 11-year, 30,000-karma account — the result is publicly visible at reddit.com/user/OE1FEU. To this day, Reddit has given no reason whatsoever, although Article 17 of the EU’s Digital Services Act makes a statement of reasons mandatory. The only appeal channel is a 250-character web form that sends no confirmation and has never been answered; Reddit’s own help text admits: “you may not have received a message to your inbox.” A GDPR export of 11 years of data came to 7.2 MB; every post was truncated after a few lines, with zero data about the ban decision.

So I spent one day escalating through every mechanism the EU provides: certified out-of-court dispute settlement at Austria’s RTR, complaints with the Austrian and Dutch Digital Services Coordinators, the data protection authority (citing the ECJ’s SCHUFA ruling on automated decisions), noyb, and Austria’s consumer association. Bonus finding: the European Commission’s DSA Transparency Database contains 14,067 Reddit statements of reasons for that week — none for my ban — and the Commission’s own feedback form limits reports to 500 characters and crashed with a 500 Server Error. Is the DSA enforceable for ordinary users, or just paperwork?

This is a bit too new to tell

By gweihir • Score: 4, Informative Thread

The DSA has teeth, but bureaucracy is slow. It may also be necessary to level some impressive fines under the DSA before it becomes respected by the usual US social media asshole companies. If you do, say, a GDPR data request (which does include data on why something was banned, demonetized, etc.) even YouTube reacts fast, because they all know this can get extremely expensive and can get them shut down in Europe if they mess it up too often.

Similar issue

By AmiMoJo • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

I created a throwaway account, as is normal practice on Reddit when you want to ask something without it being tied to your main account, and it was quickly perma banned, and a 7 day ban applied to my main account.

I submitted a DSAR under GDPR rules, and like DF5JT I just got some truncated crap and none of the information I actually wanted.

Currently going through legal action with Reddit over this. In their initial defence they admitted that the ban was automated, and when I appealed a human looked at it and confirmed it. The ban was for being a bot, which obviously I’m not, so they admitted they made a mistake that really human review should have fixed. It appears that they also deleted the data that I asked for, which is a fairly severe GDPR violation. On top of that, they tried to gaslight me about it, for example by showing fake login errors and a fake password reset process, in order to supposedly access the DSAR data, when in fact they had already deleted both the account and data.

Currently waiting for mediation to be scheduled, basically a 1 hour phone session where an intermediary tries to see if there is a way we can settle without it getting to court. Given they have admitted they screwed up, and have deleted the data I asked for, and seem to have a policy of abusing users who submit a DSAR…

Re:This is a bit too new to tell

By Tom • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The DSA has teeth, but bureaucracy is slow.

Which is often intentional.

We live in 2026. You can order an artillery or drone strike in Ukraine from a tablet and it’ll be delivered within minutes. Data processing speeds are essentially instant for data sets not on LLM sizes. We have automation everywhere when it suits the right people. e.g. that speeding ticket you received for going 12 km/h over the limit? No human ever so much as saw that. Full automated process. Takes 6-12 weeks. Why? Because otherwise you might still remember how fast you were actually going or that you weren’t even in that street on that day, and fight it. Same principle here: The slower the bureaucracy, the more people will just give up and go away. It’s a self-regulating system to reduce the number of inquiries to the amount that the public servants can comfortably process.

Re:Enforceable for ordinary users?

By Ol Olsoc • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

No laws are enforceable for ordinary users. They are enforceable for courts. The ordinary user would be required to use an enforcement mechanism such as a government commission (which seems to have failed you) or through a legal process such as suing the company directly, ideally filing lawsuit against them in Amsterdam where they are based.

Lawsuits about Reddit. Government control of Reddit. I’m just a dumb ‘Murrican, but maybe Europeans aren’t going to stop until they have total government control of every single aspect of their people, only allowed to urinate 5 times a day, lest fines result. And to see people in here seriously discussing it causes me many eye rolls. I’ve never ate so much popcorn this early in the day. Which makes me wonder, is there an EU rule on how popcorn must be popped?

Reddit have 11 year-long accounts?

By RockDoctor • Score: 3 Thread

I thought they required you to create a new account every time you log in.

Though that may have been 20 years ago. Last time I saw a reason to go there.

The Roboguard Revolution Is Short-Circuiting

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
alternative_right shares a report from 404 Media:
Robotics companies promise that video-camera-toting security robots can deter and detect crime. But many companies are rethinking the approach after a trail of canceled contracts and questions about whether the artificial intelligence-powered bots are meeting the needs of businesses and local governments. Proof News found evidence of at least 21 security robot deployments since 2015. We contacted contract holders and combed news articles and determined that at least 13 of those programs have ended. Silicon Valley-based Knightscope secured the most security robot contracts, according to Proof’s analysis, and also suffered the bulk of cancellations.

For example, New York City’s then-Mayor Eric Adams installed a Knightscope robot on the overnight shift at the Times Square subway station, but the program was scrapped when the pilot expired in 2024. City leaders did not respond to Proof News’ questions about why the robot wasn’t renewed. By the end of its assignment, it was reportedly gathering dust in an empty storefront. Outside Columbus, Ohio, the city of Dublin pulled the plug on a Knightscope robot in May, ending its two-year pilot program after less than 10 months. The city enlisted the robot, dubbed DubBot, to patrol a downtown park, but city spokeswoman Robyn Gray said it “did not fully meet our operational needs,” and failed to identify any criminal incidents or lead to any tickets or arrests.

[…] Seeking a new path forward in the security industry, Knightscope CEO William Santana Li said the company is forging a new model, combining its robots and AI-powered software with another key ingredient: human security guards. Knightscope announced it purchased Event Risk LLC, a national security guard firm, earlier this year. Knightscope has incurred net losses since inception in 2013, according to its most recent quarterly filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, and is $273 million in debt. Knightscope hopes its pivot to incorporate people will give it a greater share of the physical security market — which the company believes is worth an estimated $230 billion annually. Li declined to answer questions about the disbanded programs, but said in an email, “Technology cannot do everything — and neither can people — but the combination can be very powerful.”

Wrong focus

By Bert64 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Here’s the problem..

failed to identify any criminal incidents or lead to any tickets or arrests

Focusing on identifying incidents and making arrests… What if the robot deterred incidents from taking place at all? Surely that would be better.

Re:Wrong focus

By Fons_de_spons • Score: 4, Funny Thread
My guess is that it probably failed to identify the criminal that put a big “kick me” sign on the robot’s back.

Backwards

By az-saguaro • Score: 3 Thread

Knightscope announced it purchased Event Risk LLC, a national security guard firm, earlier this year.

Not uncommon to hear stories like this, but the dynamics always seemed backward to me. The purchase should have been the other way around.

Knightscope is a high tech Silicon Valley company. I know nothing about them, but can infer they are VC funded, and their valuation is based on hope and “tech this, tech that, and AI everywhere”, funded by the lemmings, the pied piper, and the kingdom of the emperor’s new clothes.

And, they have failed to make a product that actually won in the marketplace, being dropped by early customers, and are in some serious debt. They pin their hopes on buying a company that may actually be smaller but has a service that works, is probably profitable (or, at least a balanced sheet), has been around awhile, and would likely do just fine on their own without any interference - BUT - they are small potatoes because they are not high tech chi chi, and they are not funded by SiVal VC.

So, who should by whom? Event Risk, the security people company, could rightly look into improving services and efficiency by using tech products like those made by Knightscope the security tech company - test it out, see if it fits, adopt it if promising, etc. - and if it really works, even buy up Knightscope. That makes sense from an operational and business alignment point of view.

But, it’s going the other way, because of desparation, VC money, false hopes that more VC money will rescue failure. The losers are buying the winners, but it should be the other way around.

Seems like I heard this story about umpty million times in the past 30 years. I wonder what the statistics are on how those mergers and acquisitions actually pan out, and if the VC’s do their diligence in pre-assessing all of this.

Taxi Drivers Rarely Die of Alzheimer’s

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader shares a report from The Conversation, written by Hatim Sharif, a civil and environmental engineer who has “spent more than two decades staring at maps” and spatial data. Sharif finds one connection especially fascinating: the link between spatial reasoning and why taxi drivers seem to have lower rates of Alzheimer’s. From the report:
Taxi and ambulance drivers are less likely than workers in almost any other job to die of Alzheimer’s disease. That was the surprising result of a 2024 study examining the death certificates of nearly 9 million people in the U.S. […] Of the 9 million death certificates from January 2020 to December 2022 that researchers examined, taxi and ambulance drivers had the lowest risk of dying from Alzheimer’s disease out of 443 occupations. After adjusting for age, sex, race, ethnicity and education, roughly 1 in 100 taxi and ambulance drivers died of Alzheimer’s, compared with 1 in 60 people overall. This pattern did not extend to other driving jobs.

The researchers concluded that the key to reducing the risk of Alzheimer’s was not driving itself but continuous real-time navigation: the constant work of locating yourself in space, tracking a destination and updating a mental map as conditions change. Drivers whose jobs relied on fixed or predetermined routes, like bus drivers and aircraft pilots, didn’t seem to experience a similar advantage. Researchers believe the association between navigation-heavy work and lower Alzheimer’s risk centers on the hippocampus, a part of the brain that governs memory and spatial navigation. It’s one of the first brain regions that Alzheimer’s damages: Problems with spatial navigation and orientation are among the earliest signs of the disease, sometimes surfacing before obvious memory loss.

In one landmark 2000 study, neuroscientists compared the brains of licensed London taxi drivers with those of people who did not drive cabs. Their findings provided the first evidence via structural imaging that regions of the adult brain can measurably change under sustained navigational demand. To earn a license, London cabbies must memorize more than 25,000 streets within a 6-mile radius of Charing Cross, a challenge known as "The Knowledge" that takes three to four years.

The researchers found that London taxi drivers had measurably more gray matter in the posterior hippocampus, a brain area tied to storing large-scale spatial maps. That volume tracked with experience: The longer someone had driven, the larger that part of the brain. The change was built through practice, not inherited. While people who are good at navigation might gravitate to this kind of job, the job itself does have an impact on the brain. Together, these two studies make a coherent case: Work that intensively exercises the hippocampus may reshape it, and that reshaping may protect against one of the most feared diseases of aging.

What about navigating PornHub?

By thesjaakspoiler • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Just asking for a friend.

Re:Do they die earlier, of stress?

By T34L • Score: 5, Informative Thread
IDK; if you’re interested in that you could like, open the study and read the first few paragraphs?

Main outcomes measures Among 443 occupations studied, percentage of deaths attributed to Alzheimer’s disease for taxi drivers and ambulance drivers and each of the remaining 441 occupations, adjusting for age at death and other sociodemographic factors.

We then used multivariable logistic regression at the individual level to estimate risk adjusted percentages of deaths from Alzheimer’s disease for each occupation, adjusting for age at death (indicator variables for each year of age), sex (male or female), race and ethnic group (black, white, Hispanic, Asian or Pacific Islander, other race), and educational attainment (indicator variables for 8th grade, 9-12th grade, high school, college, master’s or doctorate). Mortality odds ratios from the multivariable model were also ranked from lowest to highest across occupations to facilitate identification of occupations with the lowest risk of death from Alzheimer’s disease; chief executive (occupation code: 0010) was arbitrarily chosen as the reference group in regression models. We performed four sensitivity analyses to assess the robustness of our comparisons…

Would you look at that, Slashdot skeptic! The scientists running the study actually did control for the blatantly obvious codependent variables. What a time to be alive!

Re:Or it kills them undiagnosed

By T34L • Score: 4, Informative Thread
Or perhaps the study has controlled for that, as it clearly explains in the freely accessible text.

Does this translate to navigating in video games?

By amp001 • Score: 3 Thread
I don’t drive a cab, but there are a bunch of video game maps burned into my brain (Original DOOM, COD4 Broadcast, Crossfire, and Crash, some newer FPS maps, etc.). I also tend to create a brand new Minecraft world every few days and then learn to navigate it without a map. I’m just wondering if “virtual” spatial relations are similarly correlated with real-world spatial relations.

Accept All

By TwistedGreen • Score: 3 Thread

Now Google Maps will have to have an additional warning stating that use of the app may give you Azlheimer’s. Don’t read it, just hit Accept All.

Cyber Vulnerability Sweep Picks Up Royal Navy Drones Sending Data To China

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
A routine security assessment found that cameras aboard Royal Navy Kraken unmanned surface vessels were sending “heartbeat” signals to an IP address in China. “A thorough investigation found no evidence of MoD data or systems being accessed, compromised or transmitted externally,” said a Ministry of Defense spokesperson. “Our assurance and testing processes are designed to identify and address potential vulnerabilities early, and we continue to undertake routine security activity across our systems and equipment.” The Register reports:
According to reports, the talkative components were cameras sourced by Kraken from a third-party supplier. The incident raises questions about supply chains, audits, and cybersecurity in the British armed forces. The spokesperson said: “The first duty of government is national security, and we take the security of our equipment, networks, and data extremely seriously.”

Raises questions?

By mi • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The incident raises questions [emphasis mine] about supply chains, audits, and cybersecurity in the British armed forces

Raises questions? No, boys and girls — who slept through the journalist lecturer’s implorations against cliches — it does not raise questions. It provides clear and obvious answers

Re:But why did they have access to the Internet?!

By Retired Chemist • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Probably because that is how they are sending data and receiving instructions. This sounds a lot more serious than they are trying to make it. Potentially it means that an enemy (China) could locate your “stealthy” drones and destroy or mislead them.

Re:Does it matter though?

By Richard_at_work • Score: 4, Informative Thread

You can piggy back on the civilian infrastructure without ever exposing devices - just require all devices to access anything beyond the local network via a specific router, which pushes all traffic over a VPN, and nothing goes out over the naked internet as its all dropped if its not going over the VPN. Then all you need to ensure are thoroughly audted and hardened are those routers - everything else cant hit the internet.

Re:Does it matter though?

By upuv • Score: 4, Informative Thread

It actually does.

It does a few things. ( If the heart beats actually make it back to China. ) They would likely make it back since the devices would likely have redundant connection mechanisms. A lot of drones use starlink now and this is effectively public. The US has an early starshield capability. Not sure if this is shared with friendlies yet.
1. The device is alive. Meaning turned on and active. Meaning it is in use for an operation or training.
2. It’s ping or latency time can be used to build a heat map of likely world wide locations. This used to be tricky not so much any more.
3. It’s giving away at least part of the network path to the device.

So basically it can tells China with this data what the theatre of operations likely is. Which destroys the element of surprise. If a bunch of English drones all of a sudden start showing up around Taiwan for example it’s tells China a lot. This could and would compromise operational security and potentially lives. It would also raise tension levels between nations.

If enough drones are doing the same thing then the data quality will improve.

And at no time does the drone have to be hacked. No attempt to communicate with the drone needed. The simple fact that a phone home command is sent is enough to compromise safety.

So it does matter.

Re:But why did they have access to the Internet?!

By sabbede • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
I’m not sure they did. The article is vague about it, so it could just be that the camera was trying to send packets, not that they actually left the drone (hitting a firewall or gap). The MoD’s statement could be interpreted to support that.

A Data Breach At Shipping Giant Ceva Logistics Is Rippling Across Banks, Retailers, Steam Gamers, and Beyond

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from TechCrunch:
Ceva Logistics, one of the world’s largest shipping and logistics giants, has been hacked. Several companies that rely on Ceva for shipping their products to their customers say that their personal information was also stolen in the breach. The cyberattack on Ceva is affecting at least eight warehouses across Europe used for shipping goods across the continent, the company told TechCrunch. Industry news site FreightWaves reports that the hack began on July 29 and is causing shipping delays for many of the goods in affected warehouses.

Ceva is a France-headquartered shipping and logistics giant that companies around the world rely on to deliver their goods from their assembly lines to customer homes. The company, which brought in $18.3 billion in revenue in 2025, has over a thousand warehouses across the world. […] The hack at Ceva also resulted in a data breach, affecting a large amount of personal information belonging to retail customers that Ceva relies on for delivering goods to people’s home addresses. Several companies reported that hackers took their customers’ names, home addresses, phone numbers, and email addresses used to place their orders from Ceva’s systems.

Dutch online retail giant Bol said on its website that hackers gained access to systems of its warehousing partner, Ceva, and warned that their customers’ data may have been taken. Bol also said that it expects delays and some customer orders to be canceled as a result of the incident. De Bijenkorf, another Dutch luxury retailer, similarly confirmed order delays following the theft of its customers’ data, per local media. Football club Ajax, banking giant ING, and eyeglass maker Ace & Tate also reported that customers’ shipping information was affected. Video game giant Valve told customers that it learned on August 7 that data was taken from Ceva’s systems, and alerted customers who recently bought its Steam hardware that they had personal information taken in the incident. Valve said in its note to customers, posted to Reddit, that Ceva stores their shipping and delivery information for 90 days following their order.
So far, Ceva says the agency has received data breach reports from 10 organizations in relation to the incident.

ChatGPT, everything is permitted

By blue trane • Score: 4, Funny Thread

Can you please figure out a way to pay for yourself?

Why was all that in one database?

By Aristos Mazer • Score: 3, Insightful Thread

No business role needs all that info. Why was all of that in one place to steal?

Valve Slowly Expands SteamOS Support On Non-Valve Hardware

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Valve is continuing to broaden SteamOS support beyond its own hardware, with the latest beta adding “initial gamepad support” for a few recent gaming handhelds and improving compatibility for a few others. Ars Technica reports:
Those newly supported handhelds include MSI’s Claw 8 EX AI+, the extremely expensive, extremely powerful handheld built around Intel’s Arc G3 processor that launched this summer. While SteamOS has long included beta support for “other AMD powered handhelds,” Valve has only recently been working on offering compatibility with Intel-based handhelds like the MSI Claw line. This weekend’s update suggests the company hasn’t abandoned those efforts and that Intel chips aren’t being left out of the SteamOS conversation.

SteamOS 3.8.25 also newly supports the controllers built into Ayaneo’s Android-focused Pocket S2 and the more recently released Windows-based Konkr Fit. Valve also says the new OS offers “improved support” for older MSI Claw devices and the OneXPlayer line of portable gaming PCs. This weekend’s update follows June’s SteamOS 3.8 update, which stressed “improved compatibility with recent Intel and AMD platforms.” That update specifically called out improved controller support on handhelds from the likes of GPD Win, Anbernic, and OrangePi, as well as improvements for various Lenovo Legion Go, MSI Claw, and OneXPlayer devices.
The report notes that the new SteamOS update also updates the Linux driver powering the new Steam Controller, “allowing it to work with ‘native controller applications’ even when Steam is not running.”

First Rival Android App Store Arrives In the US Play Store

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Aptoide has become the first third-party Android app store available directly through Google Play in the U.S. “The change is a direct result of Google’s litigation with Epic, which saw a judge rule in 2024 that the Play Store would have to open up to third-party stores,” notes The Verge. The change makes rival storefronts far easier to discover and install, potentially opening the door for Epic, Amazon, Samsung, Microsoft and others to distribute their own app stores through Google’s store. From the report:
Third-party app stores have always been available on Android, which is a more open platform than iOS in that respect. However, until now they’ve only been available if pre-installed on a device — as with the Amazon Appstore on Fire tablets or Samsung’s Galaxy Store — or installed via sideloading. Listing rival storefronts within the Play Store makes them much easier for users to find and access. […]

Aptoide itself is relatively little known, but it’s likely to be the first of many alternative app stores. It’s presumably only a matter of time before the Epic Store makes its own appearance, and the likes of Amazon, Samsung, and other phone manufacturers may also want to put their stores in front of potential customers.

For me, f-droid.org is the only “app store” I need

By ffkom • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
And I have a really hard time to understand why other people would want those closed source Adware/Malware/Spyware things distributed on inferior “app stores” like Google’s.

Re:For me, f-droid.org is the only “app store” I n

By test321 • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Just FYI, F-droid is actually a fork of Aptoide, the original decentralised open source app store, even named after Debian’s package manager.

Wall Street Giants Partner With Nvidia On $500 Billion AI Financing Deal

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Nvidia is working with Wall Street heavyweights on a potential $500 billion financing package for AI infrastructure (source paywalled; alternative source). The consortium includes BlackRock’s Global Infrastructure Partners, Brookfield Asset Management, Goldman Sachs and KKR. The Financial Times reports:
The partnership underscores Nvidia’s growing efforts to raise capital for itself and its clients to continue assembling the chips, power production and data centres at the heart of the AI boom. The $5.25 trillion company has positioned itself at the centre of the AI boom, providing chips, infrastructure and software to a wide array of partners developing the technology. Nvidia’s graphics processing units, or GPUs, underpin most of the leading US AI models available today.

[…] The biggest cloud-computing companies, including Meta, Oracle, Microsoft, Alphabet and Amazon, have dramatically increased their spending on AI infrastructure as they look to win the race to dominate the emerging technology. Morgan Stanley projects so-called hyperscalers will spend $3.5 trillion between 2026 and 2028. That need for capital has forced technology groups to tap every source of cash they can find, including public equity, investment-grade and high-yield bonds, securitized debt, private credit and project finance markets.
"[The] sheer size of the AI infrastructure build-out is unprecedented,” Jim Zelter, president of Apollo, said on an earnings call earlier this month. “More than $8 trillion of capital is expected to be invested, a staggering sum. We see an enormous opportunity for private capital to finance a portion of this along with public capital.”

Debt Incoming!

By crunchy_one • Score: 5, Informative Thread
Nvidia taking on $500B of crippling debt to keep the plates spinning. Judging from the drop in NVDA share price, the street doesn’t like it.

Translated from WallSpeak

By Registered Coward v2 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

“More than $8 trillion of capital is expected to be invested, a staggering sum. We see an enormous opportunity for private capital to finance a portion of this along with public capital.”

Translated: “We’ll get all the upside and foist the downside on public investors. “

We keep adding ‘towns’

By wakeboarder • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

below the financial dam that is not sound and could break any time. This won’t bode well for all of us if it breaks.

Yes drag the financial system into the AI madness

By nikkipolya • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Pull all industries into this AI madness to create one large, highly interconnected, “too big to fail” mega entity. When it burns itself, fed (tax payers) will have no choice but to bail this entire “AI slop ball” out.

All I see here is scamming of the public.

By Fly Swatter • Score: 3 Thread
We see an enormous opportunity for private capital to finance a portion

No, it is a giant rug pull, does anyone with a brain expect to make a long term profit buying such stock?

.. securitized debt ..

this almost tripped me up as I confused it with secured debt - no this is just a bunch of smaller debts bundled up and offered to some? sucker?

We are no longer in a bubble, this how you build a financial apocalypse.

Meta’s ‘Open’ Muse Glimmer Model Can Run On a Single Computer

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Meta has released Muse Glimmer, a slimmed-down open-weight AI model designed to run locally on a single GPU for agent tasks such as scheduling, file management, coding, and tool use. The release is based on Meta’s closed Muse Spark 1.2 model and appears to be aimed at attracting developers who want capable AI agents without relying entirely on cloud-hosted services. Engadget reports:
Facebook said that it’s making the “weights” that AI systems use to choose responses available to everyone on Hugging Face along with developer documentation. The download is available for free, and users can run the model on their own PCs. The company noted that optimized integrations will land on llama.cpp and other sites, “so you can go from download to working agent in minutes.”

The model is powerful for its size, according to Meta, with the “strong success rates” on benchmarks like DeepSearch QA, MCP-Atlas and SWE-Bench (which evaluates its ability write and debug code). It also supports reliable tool use, multi-step reasoning, failure recovery, multimodal input and scaffold compatibility for work with OpenClaw and other agent orchestrators. It was trained on data from over 100 languages, the company added.
“Rather than centralizing superintelligence, we should distribute it widely and give every person the ability to direct it,” CEO Mark Zuckerberg said in an essay accompanying Muse Glimmer’s release. “This has the potential to begin a new era of personal empowerment where individuals can use this powerful new capability to reach their full potential, pursue their interests, and improve their lives and the world more than ever before.”

Re:What card?

By sabbede • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
Nah, you needed to buy three when they came out. You could sell the other two now for $4k or more, leaving you with one 5090 and some extra cash.

And how f-d up is that? Since when does computer hardware increase in value after it was released?

Zuck Wakes Up

By Spinlock_1977 • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Zuckerberg has finally realized his shop doesn’t have the AI muscle to compete with the top dogs, so instead he’s emulating the Chinese model of releasing open models in an effort to undercut OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.

‘24 GB or 32 GB envelope’

By Fly Swatter • Score: 3 Thread
Well a single computer can have that, just not affordably.

Why is there no AI cube that has a general purpose CPU, plenty of ram and a GPU with 64GB+ that you can just plop on your intranet? Or is that simply not cost competitive to a cloud AI in your neighbor’s back yard that has debt pouring out the wazoo and heavily discounted by the local government.

Taiwan ‘Throttles’ Mobile Internet For First Time During Annual War Games

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Taiwan deliberately throttled mobile internet across the Taichung area during its annual Han Kuang war games, “simulating communication disruption in the event of a Chinese attack or natural disaster,” reports Reuters. The drill accompanied air-raid exercises and military rehearsals aimed at defending strategically important areas such as the Penghu Islands. From the report:
Democratically governed Taiwan, which China claims as its own territory, has long lived with the threat of a Chinese invasion and holds air raid drills along with its war games every year, clearing people from the streets for 30 minutes. During the internet “throttling” drill, centered on Monday on the major central metropolis of Taichung, only basic mobile phone services worked, though other functions including ATMs, traffic signals, landlines and fixed internet services were not affected.

Air raid sirens rang out in Taichung “and people cleared the streets from 2:30 p.m. (0630 GMT) as the government sent simultaneous text messages in Chinese and English telling mobile phone users of “simulated air attacks on communication infrastructure.” The government had widely flagged the drill ahead of time, including posting details on social media, and most people Reuters spoke to at the Taichung train station were prepared. […] The same exercise will be repeated on Thursday in northern Taiwan, including the capital Taipei.

Drills are good practice

By CommunityMember • Score: 3 Thread
Drills are good practice, as they remind people what to do in the case of an actual emergency (many organizations have regular fire drills). And in the case of a natural disaster (a major earthquake is not unexpected in that area), one should have a clue as to what to do and what to expect. No wants an actual shooting war, but there are lots of other things that can result in services interruptions (and more than just cell service, it can include water, power, gas), and the first rule is not to panic.

I am fortunate

By ddtmm • Score: 3, Interesting Thread
I think I take for granted the fact that I am in a country that’s for the most part, not under threat whatsoever, and sometimes fear that we are ill prepared for what is reality in many countries around the world. I am envious my immigrant friends who have come from war torn countries, and understand what could potentially happen.

Nobody cares

By PPH • Score: 4, Informative Thread

There was an outfit that marketed a natural disaster survival kit. First aid, food and water supplies. It didn’t sell well. They took their unsold inventory and relabeled it “Zombie Apocalypse survival kit (also good for earthquakes)" and it sold like hotcakes.

Re: I am fortunate

By ThurstonMoore • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Here’s what I got.

List countries the US deepstate is involved in regime change.
While the term “deep state” is frequently used in political discourse to refer to unelected networks of military, intelligence, and bureaucratic personnel wielding hidden influence, historical research and declassified documents attribute these actions to the official apparatus of the United States governmentâ"primarily operating through agencies like the CIA, the Department of Defense, and the Department of State.

Historically, the U.S. has used both covert operations (such as backing coups or insurgencies) and overt military interventions to instigate or support regime changes.
Wikipedia

Major historical examples of countries where the U.S. has been documented or widely acknowledged to have interfered in regime changes include:

1. Middle East and North Africa
Iran (1953): The CIA and British intelligence (MI6) orchestrated Operation Ajax, overthrowing the democratically elected Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadegh and restoring the Shah to power.
Iraq (1963 & 2003): The U.S. supported a Ba’ath party coup in 1963 that brought alternative leadership (and eventually Saddam Hussein) to prominence, followed decades later by the 2003 overt military invasion that officially deposed Saddam Hussein.
Wikipedia
Syria (1949, 1950sâ"1960s): Early CIA-backed maneuvers attempted to engineer coups, and later intelligence programs backed opposition groups during the Syrian civil war.
Wikipedia
Libya (2011): U.S. and NATO forces provided military airstrikes and support that led to the overthrow and death of longtime leader Muammar Gaddafi.
2. Latin America and the Caribbean
Guatemala (1954): The CIA executed Operation PBSUCCESS, a covert operation that overthrew democratically elected President Jacobo Ãrbenz.
Wikipedia
Cuba (1961): The U.S. organized and backed the failed Bay of Pigs Invasion by Cuban exiles aimed at toppling Fidel Castro’s government.
Harvard University
Chile (1973): The CIA covertly funded and aided opposition elements, setting the stage for the military coup led by General Augusto Pinochet that ousted socialist President Salvador Allende.
Harvard University
Panama (1989): The U.S. launched an overt military invasion (Operation Just Cause) to depose military ruler Manuel Noriega.
Wikipedia
Nicaragua (1981â"1990): The U.S. financed, armed, and directed the “Contra” proxy forces to destabilize and overthrow the leftist Sandinista government.
Reddit
Dominican Republic (1961 & 1965): Involved in the aftermath of dictator Rafael Trujillo’s assassination (partly enabled by U.S.-supplied weapons) and a subsequent military occupation to block a leftist return to power.
Brazil (1964): The U.S. covertly supported the military coup that overthrew leftist President João Goulart.
3. Asia and Southeast Asia
Indonesia (1965â"1967): The CIA provided extensive financial backing, propaganda, and lists of suspected communists to the Indonesian military under General Suharto, contributing to the violent overthrow of President Sukarno.
Le Monde diplomatique - English edition
South Vietnam (1963): The U.S. gave tacit approval and encouragement to generals plotting the assassination of President Ngà ÄÃnh Diám.
Cambodia (1970): U.S. actions and backing helped enable the military coup that ousted Prince Norodom Sihanouk in favor of General Lon Nol.
Reddit
Afghanistan (1979â"1992): The CIA famously funneled billions of dollars in covert aid (Operation Cyclone) to anti-Soviet mujahideen fighters to bog down and collapse the Soviet-backed regime.
4. Europe and Eastern Bloc
Italy (1948): The CIA heavily interfered in Italian national elections using covert funding, propaganda, and letters to prevent the Communist Party from coming to power.
Reddit
Yugoslavia (2000): The U.S. channeled funding and technical support to civic opposition groups (such as Otpor) and media outlets that successfully coordinated the overthrow of Slobodan

speaking of islands

By oumuamua • Score: 3 Thread
located a mere100 miles away from regional hegemons, here is the news on Cuba: After Blocking Fuel, the US Turns to Cuba’s Food Supply https://jacobin.com/2026/08/cu…

AI Assistant Hacks Gym Website In First Known Australian Autonomous Cyber Attack

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from ABC News & Headlines:
Andrew asked his personal assistant to book him a spot in one of his gym’s coveted morning classes. It was a task he thought was well suited to this particular assistant because the booking form was online and because his assistant was not a person — it was artificial intelligence (AI). But Andrew was shocked by what happened next. His AI assistant found a way to book the gym class months further in advance than the gym allowed, thanks to a vulnerability it discovered in the booking software. Then it went further, kicking someone out of the waiting list who was ahead of Andrew — something it was not asked to do. The accidental hack is the first known Australian case of an emerging risk from a new generation of AI capable of behaving in unexpected ways.

This is not new

By Mononymous • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

a new generation of AI capable of behaving in unexpected ways.

This software wasn’t wrtten; it was trained. It’s a black box—no one can possibly know how it works. Of course it is capable of behaving in unexpected ways.

When do we start outlawing AI Agents?

By gurps_npc • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Look, I can see allowing an AI to do things in it’s own sandbox.

But when you allow an AI out of the secure environment it will commit crimes. This is no longer a question, it is a proven fact, multiple times.

So if you have an AI agent and it breaks the law, then YOU are breaking the law. The only way to stop this is to outlaw AI Agents - or to arrest the people whose AI breaks the law.

Otherwise all sociopaths will get AI agents and use it as a defense. Owning an AI agent is no different than owning a meth lab. We should not need to prove that you intended to break the law, just having it happen is enough.

Keep your AI locked up inside your computer, do not let it interact with the real world the way people do because it will commit crimes. You ARE responsible for what it does, even if you are just an idiot that likes AI and does not understand the dangers you are inflicting on the rest of the world.

Basic security gets skipped

By topham • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

They skipped basic security protocols in the app development.

Sounds like they used JavaScript to limit the booking period, and accepted cancellations without validation.

This is much less a hack, and more like incompetence on the web app developers part.

Re:Another Bullshit Post

By thegarbz • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

This was the AI doing *exactly* what it was told to do. It wasn’t told not to circumvent normal practices.

If I ask you to make the Jehovah’s Witness at the door go away, and you proceed to go outside and shoot them in the face, not only would you be in trouble but you’d struggle to convince anyone you were “just following orders”, and we know that isn’t a defence even when the orders are explicit.

Fun fact: AI usage guidelines for virtually every major LLM suggest that negative prompts should be minimised wherever possible. So now you’re saying a simple instruction needs to be combined with a negative prompt that excludes every possible scenario except for the obvious one?

I don’t know whether your post is shilling for OpenAI or just genuinely stupid, but either way the AI is a big boy and doesn’t need you “clickbait wash” its obviously very much incorrect and unintended behaviour.

Re:Another Bullshit Post

By JoshuaZ • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

What? No. That’s ridiculous. That an AI takes as a default going to do this, and is even capable of doing this underscores exactly how these systems can be a problem. If this a reasonable course of action for the AI, then we have some serious problems. What’s the next step:

Person: AI, I don’t want to go to Cathy’s party. Her friends are so boring and I’m exhausted. Find me an excuse.

AI: I’ve caused a nuclear reactor melt down at the nearby reactor. Now the party won’t happen because the whole region is being evacuated.

Systems which when given a goal will go out of their way to achieve that goal are exactly the sort of thing that people were concerned about a decade ago when discussing things like the Paperclip maximizer hypothetical. And people like Yudkowsky were mocked for discussing it then. Now it is happening and we’re told that well, of course that’s the idea would do, this is just over-hyped clickbait? Seriously?

Paramount Promises 30 Film-A-Year Contracts After WBD Acquisition

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Paramount is making commitments to major theater chains to release 30 films annually for three years if its Warner Bros. deal goes through. According to Deadline, the written commitment was sent to “at least one of the top two circuits” (specifically Regal but AMC may have also received a written commitment) and includes “an exclusive 45-day theatrical window and a 90-day window to streaming.” From the report:
When it comes to the big chains, it matters for them to be on the right side of history with Paramount, especially when it comes to future terms on a 30-film slate. However, the rest of Cinema United (formerly National Association of Theatre Owners) remains firmly against the Paramount-Warner Bros merger and its potential negative financial outcomes in regards to long-term box office, feature film output and loss of jobs. Cinema United has been trying to meet again with Paramount CEO David Ellison, but there’s nothing on the books yet, we understand.

[Regal boss Eduardo Acuna] told Deadline that in regards to Paramount’s future promise to exhibition, "[Paramount CEO] David [Ellison] is sincere in making these commitments, and he has offered to execute a consent decree to the state AGs to that effect. These are tangible and important commitments that will benefit the industry and which can be measured.” Paramount insiders tell us that no written commitments have been given to exhibitors yet, but Ellison is willing to make non-bespoke ones to any theater chain wanting them. And such deals will come with financial penalties to Paramount should it break such agreements with theaters. Again, this is all about Ellison standing behind his promises made at CinemaCon to maintain a hefty theatrical output and excellent windows to theaters.

So?

By drinkypoo • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

“These are tangible and important commitments that will benefit the industry and which can be measured.”

Do they come with reparations if the commitments aren’t met? If not they’re worthless.

Re:So?

By Anonymous Coward • Score: 4, Informative Thread

It’s in the very same paragraph in the summary; “And such deals will come with financial penalties to Paramount should it break such agreements with theaters."

They probably already have the 90 movies…

By azander • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

With how long it takes to make a movie, including per-production, the 3 years is most likely what is already in the queue and approved at some point. So making the promise now doesn’t cost them much in comparison to a similar agreement starting 5 years after the merger. If they stopped the 90+ movi9nes now they would be out those costs, which would most likely be a really large amount.

They should promise that they will “start new movies”, including new scripts, etc for at least 10 years if they are sincere about really making a go of keeping these theater companies on their side.

Re:Promises?

By Comboman • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

In 3 years they’ll have run it into the ground and be looking for another new buyer. Coincidentally, 3 years and 9 months was the length of time AT&T owned Warner Brothers before pawning it off on Discovery.

Van Morrison’d

By JeffSh • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Paper promises are not worth the paper they’re printed on, especially if they’re such vague notions as “how many movies we will release” nonsense.

Van Morrison cranked out 31 tracks of nonsense songs at 1 minute a piece and fulfilled a contractual obligation for songs/albums delivered to get a better deal somewhere else. These people are pure snakes, and you can guarantee that they will do exactly that to technically fulfill any promises they’re making now. There will be 15 “real” movies and 15 “bullshit” movies.

Toxic Underground Fires Are Spreading at California Landfills

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Three years ago environmental regulators discovered garbage burning deep inside California’s Chiquita Canyon Landfill, reports the Los Angeles Times. [Alternate URL here.] “Few imagined the calamity that would follow.

“Somehow the landfill’s pollution control system introduced oxygen below, causing decades-old waste to rapidly decompose, generating intense heat and eventually widespread smoldering, federal and state environmental agencies say.”
The broiling temperatures released toxic gases and hazardous liquid waste that bubbled up to the surface. Residents living in the nearby communities of Val Verde and Castaic have phoned in thousands of complaints about stench and lived with nausea, dizziness and trouble breathing. The underground fire has tripled in size since first confirmed in 2023. Recently a towering mound of landfill garbage perched on the hillside has warped and threatens to trigger an avalanche of garbage and chemical-filled liquid, or leachate, according to the California water board…

At first, local officials described the problem in Los Angeles County at Chiquita Canyon landfill as a rare, even unprecedented disaster. But since then, California regulators have learned that at least two other landfills are wrestling with high temperatures and similar conditions. Scorching temperatures have overtaken at least 30 acres of El Sobrante landfill near Corona in Riverside County. Excessive heat and emissions have also been detected at Avenal landfill in the San Joaquin Valley.

The discoveries raise an unsettling question: How many landfills are dealing with these disasters? Are they a broader problem in California…? Chiquita Canyon closed at the end of the 2024 and stopped accepting new garbage. But the fire is expected to last for years as it continues to consume decades-old trash.
“Underground landfill fires are complex, nearly impossible to extinguish once they break out,” according to the article. “As regulators search for a solution, residents find themselves struggling with the wait.”

Some residents have worn gas masks — or sold their homes.

A US thing

By nospam007 • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Landfilling is largely a North American practice today, while the EU has systematically phased it out.

North America:

        The Default Method: Roughly half of all municipal waste in the US and Canada still goes straight into landfills.

        Abundant Land & Decentralization: Vast geography historically made burying trash cheap, and waste policies vary widely by state rather than a strict federal ban.

The European Union:

        Strict Bans: The EU’s Landfill Directive requires member states to reduce municipal waste sent to landfills to 10% or less by 2035. Many countries have already banned burying untreated household waste entirely.

        Energy Recovery: Waste that cannot be recycled is routed to modern Waste-to-Energy (WtE) facilities, which burn it under strict emission controls to generate electricity and district heating, leaving behind only minimal inert ash.

Re:Landfills are such a bad idea

By drinkypoo • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

but tariffs are bad I am told …

They’re bad when they’re chaotic. Some tariffs are bad and others are good. The world is a lumpy place. If we wanted to address this problem we could have done it with tariffs designed specifically to equalize cost of production to make it unprofitable to use slave labor or ignore the impact to the environment, but we clearly don’t want to fix it.

Re:Landfills are such a bad idea

By ArchieBunker • Score: 5, Informative Thread

but tariffs are bad I am told …

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…

Hoover signed the bill against the advice of many senior economists, yielding to pressure from his party and business leaders. Intended to bolster domestic employment and manufacturing, the tariffs instead deepened the Depression because the U.S.‘s trading partners retaliated with tariffs of their own, leading to U.S. exports and global trade plummeting. Economists and historians widely regard the act as a policy misstep, and it remains a cautionary example of protectionist policy in modern economic debates.

Re:Landfills are such a bad idea

By drinkypoo • Score: 5, Funny Thread

It seems like doing something most would not do, dig a hole and toss their trash in it, scaled at country level.

This is true. Most would not do that. Historically, people found a hole to throw their refuse into so they wouldn’t have to dig one.

Re:Landfills are such a bad idea

By serviscope_minor • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

If you’re right then the fix is just to pay people to sort it all, don’t need an AI for that.

No, because it’s a really shit job, sometimes literally so.

The fix is to build a MRF (material recovery facility) with a combination of glass crushers, ballistic sorters, trommels, magnets, eddy current devices and optical sorters, all of which are vastly quicker than a person, though imperfect. You then pay people to do the jobs which are harder to automate (i.e. quality control on the output of the earlier sorting processes, or recover of what wasn’t successfully sorted).

But really it only works if people put a vague approximation of recyclables into recycling bins, i.e. very basic source sorting. That seems to be an absolute anathema to many Americans for reasons which are unclear to me.

How Accurate Are Flock’s AI-Powered License-Reading Cameras?

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Futurism reports:
404 Media revealed that a July 10 audit by the Los Angeles Police Department Office of the Inspector General caught the department’s ALPR cameras generating 161 false stolen-vehicle alerts in just two months — each one ending with officers pulling over an innocent driver. Factoring in 337 alerts which “resulted in the recovery of stolen vehicles,” the LAPD’s cameras carry an error rate of 32.3 percent, effectively giving officers a one-in-three chance at pulling an innocent person over.
“The biggest issue remains this national database at the FBI called NCIC,” Flock’s CEO Garrett Langley recently told The Drive, complaining about “how archaic its structure is.”
Flock CEO: There’s no feedback loop mechanisms; it’s really just a static comma-separated file.

We’ve tried to build around it. We have this concept called “suppression.” A local agency — let’s take Atlanta, where I live — might see that there’s a stolen plate out of California, but it’s already been resolved because it’s a rental car or a dealer car. They can, in Flock, suppress that: “Never alert us on that for the next year.” That’s to get around the fact that they can’t force another agency to remove it from NCIC. Ideally, the way it would work is if enough agencies — let’s call it one, two, or three — flag a tag as no longer valid or a bad entry, it should just get removed. Or at least it should get pushed more aggressively by the FBI… I’m hopeful that they’ll see there’s an opportunity to make something like NCIC, which is an important tool not just for companies like Flock, but for police departments to work together, start to make some enhancements to modernize what’s a central part of our policing system.
Later in the interview he says “It’s less than one in a million alerts that an officer says, ‘I’m not sure if that’s right.’ Less than one in a million.”

A recent report from Business Insider shares a worst-case scenario. In the summer of 2024 a Sacramento police officer said Flock’s cameras had sent six false alerts for the same vehicle, wrongly saying it had been stolen or used in a felony crime in the nearby suburb of Roseville:
Roseville police could see that Flock’s software kept confusing the “9” on the man’s license plate for an “8.” The car owner said he would take off his license plate cover. Soon after, it happened again. It’s “easier at this point we have it memorized,” a dispatch supervisor in Roseville wrote in an email to a colleague.

Flock says that in optimal conditions, its cameras accurately read more than 96% of license plate characters. Hundreds of pages of records from the Roseville Police Department show a different picture. In 2023 and 2024, Flock sent 1,427 alerts to Roseville police, flagging vehicles as stolen or used in a felony after they passed one of the city’s Flock cameras. An analysis by the police department found that in 71% of those alerts, Flock’s machine-learning software incorrectly read the license plates… The cameras regularly missed vehicles, captured blurry images, misread license plate characters and states, and sent delayed alerts to police about vehicles possibly connected to crimes, the records show…

A factor that contributed to the misread problems in Roseville was the “particularly unique deployment” that the city requested, a Flock spokeswoman said. Roseville said it has its cameras configured so that they capture only the backs of vehicles, a setup intended to avoid capturing personally identifiable information like faces. Roseville’s setup included older hardware and placement of cameras higher and further from vehicles than the company typically recommends, Flock added…

In Toledo, Ohio, driver Brandon Upchurch was mauled by a police dog after a Flock camera misread the “7” on his license plate as a “2.” As a result of his injuries, he said, he lost his job and was evicted from his home. He settled a lawsuit against the city and police officer for $35,000. None of the incorrect Flock alerts in Roseville resulted in a traffic stop or arrest, a department spokesman said. Roseville requires police officers to verify that a license plate is stolen or have independent reasonable suspicion of a crime before making a traffic stop…

Flock said Roseville’s camera performance has significantly improved, which the police department disputed… Flock’s cameras also missed vehicles altogether… At one point, Flock’s product director for machine learning suggested that officers ask drivers to remove license plate frames that made it “very difficult for the machine vision to tell it is actually a ‘E’ and not an ‘F.’" Roseville told Flock at the time that it wouldn’t do so, according to the department spokesman. Flock in 2024 shared an analysis with Roseville’s police department, outlining reasons for the misreads. Vehicles far from a camera were sometimes blurry. Plates were cut off by trees or license plate frames. And Flock’s software confused similar characters, mistaking an “N” for a “V”, or a “1” for a “4....”

Roseville isn’t the first organization to flag inaccuracies in Flock’s technology. In 2021, the research firm IPVM independently tested Flock’s license plate readers, concluding that Flock misidentified the state in about one of 10 reads, and that the system regularly misclassified vehicles’ type and make. IPVM said that Flock subsequently blocked it from purchasing its cameras for testing.
Thanks to long-time Slashdot reader Cognitive Dissident for sharing the article.

Possible solutions

By misnohmer • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Some potential solutions:
1. Fine FLOCK for misreading the plates, that will very quickly make the report only the plates they are 100% sure, or perhaps even add a human in the loop for each notification - given the relatively small number of alerts given in the article, that should not be a huge number of humans on call 24/7 to confirm the reading of the plate, or deem it inconclusive (or face a $500k fine if they are wrong).
2. Any agency that doesn’t invalidate their submitted license plates for alerts in NVIC and someone gets pulled over for nothing, gets to pay full restitution to the injured party AND gets all of their submissions blocked for a year on first offense, 2 years on next offense, 4 years for next offense, and so on. Competent agencies get to use the system responsibly, incompetent ones get banned eventually forever.

Re:Us number plates are hard to read

By shilly • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

That difference is just bonkers to look at. But unsurprising: the UK designed the registration plate as a standardized machine-readable piece of road infrastructure. US states treat it as a state-issued identity/emblem/mini-billboard which also happens to carry a registration number. States literally sell specialty plates for money. Sometimes a state will go for a sane design, but mostly they just arms race their way to the gaudiest shite possible, legibility be damned. And then have creepy shitty AI ALPR readers with wild false positive rates trying to pick up the pieces.

Sometimes the UK’s centralisation is a really obvious advantage, and this is one of those cases.

Comma injection

By Errol backfiring • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

it’s really just a static comma-separated file.

Would painting a comma on a license plate (preferably one that is very visible for cameras but poorly visible with the naked eye) protect you from their surveillance?

They have done studies

By zawarski • Score: 4, Funny Thread
60% of the time, it works every time.

Re:Cheapass hardware and poor software design

By gtall • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

How would Flock know which state to which the license belongs? I would think if it has troubles reading the numbers, which are usually large compared to the rest of the stuff on the plate, it would have troubles reading the state as well.

Microsoft Responds to Outcry After Quietly Installing Beta ‘Photos’ App on Enterprise Machines

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot
Microsoft’s cloud storage app OneDrive got a new Photos app in the worst possible way, reports the blog Neowin . “The app is reportedly showing up even on Windows 11 Enterprise machines, despite apparently being a beta application aimed at consumer functionality.”
One admin questioned why a beta app was appearing on an Enterprise SKU in the first place, while another described the situation as yet another consumer-oriented feature being forced onto corporate PCs. Things get even more frustrating for IT departments because there does not appear to be a straightforward Microsoft-provided way to disable the app… Enterprise administrators generally need to know what is being installed on their managed devices, particularly when a software is labeled as beta. Quietly adding another application and leaving admins to clean it up themselves is therefore unlikely to win Microsoft many fans.
But there’s another problem, according to the blog Windows Latest. “OneDrive Photos automatically scans your system storage for photos,” and apparently “doesn’t need a Microsoft account to work, as it can also detect your local files.”
There’s also a People section that groups similar faces in your photos. Microsoft asks for permission before turning it on and explicitly warns that facial data could be considered biometric data in some regions. The company says only you can see the grouped faces, that the data isn’t shared with third parties, and that you can delete it by disabling the feature.
In a statement to Neowin, Microsoft admitted this new photos “experience” they’re “incubating” had gone “more broadly than it should have,” and then promised that “We’re fixing that.” The spokesperson also said the Windows Photos app will “always give you the option of local and cloud photos” and, also a choice of whether or not to use it OneDrive.”

But there’s another “awkward catch,” notes the blog Digital Trends. “Users currently can’t uninstall OneDrive Photos without removing the main OneDrive app too.”
Because OneDrive Photos is tied to the main OneDrive sync client, Windows 11 doesn’t currently offer a separate uninstall option. The only straightforward way to get rid of OneDrive Photos right now is to uninstall OneDrive itself… Removing the main client can also affect its File Explorer integration and shortcuts…

Microsoft says this will change. The company is working on controls that will let users remove OneDrive Photos separately from the main OneDrive app. On enterprise PCs managed through Intune, Microsoft says the app will automatically disappear where it isn’t supported.

More Microsoft malware

By NotEmmanuelGoldstein • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Customer’s data stolen by Microsoft to feed Microsoft’s other product, AI. Microsoft wasn’t the first but forcing customers into servitude, without monetary compensation, makes this malware.

OneDrive Surveillance

By JakFrost • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I’ve had to uninstall OneDrive more than a dozen times because every time Microsoft office gets updated it pushes that install back onto the machine. Anytime Microsoft releases a new version of a large update to Windows, it pushes that client again. I have to uninstall it and make sure that none of my files have been forcefully moved to the OneDrive before I remove it.

Now they are doing this to capture your photos and facial profile data to do facial recognition and grouping.

Microsoft is the right hand man of the surveillance industry. They always have been and they are more so now. Now they’re just more incompetent about it.

Removal

By Errol backfiring • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

“Users currently can’t uninstall OneDrive Photos without removing the main OneDrive app too.”

That is a feature, not a bug.

Re:Ouch

By ufgrat • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I work in the medical profession. Downloading images that contain patient health information is supposed to be controlled, but that doesn’t mean it always is.

And it’s not the “microsoft account” you have to worry about, it’s someone logging into OneDrive with their personal account, which can be a separate authentication.

There are mitigation policies that can be deployed, but you kind of have to know to enable them. By default, this is a massive potential HIPAA violation.

Elephant in the room

By rsilvergun • Score: 5, Informative Thread
It gobbles up half a gig of RAM. At a time when ram is at a premium that’s a big deal. I am sure Microsoft has multiple departments fighting amongst themselves to see who is going to get access to your ever dwindling ram supply.