Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Snap Reaches Settlement In Social Media Addiction Lawsuit Ahead of Trial
  2. Study Claims Vizio Simply Ignores ‘Smart’ TV Spying Opt Out Requests
  3. Apple HomeView Ultra, Drone and Laundry-Folding Robot Reportedly In Development
  4. SpaceX Is Reportedly Looking At Buying Boost Mobile
  5. OpenAI Might Rebrand Its Data Centers As ‘AI Compute Campuses’
  6. The New York Times Sues Brave Web Browser For AI Scraping, Bypassing Paywalls
  7. Microsoft’s Canada Timezone Troubles Leave Admins Fixing Calendars, Pretending They’re In Bogota
  8. Marvell to Buy Lumentum In $115 Billion Bet On AI Connectivity
  9. Supermarket Freezers Across Europe Hit By Second Suspected Cyberattack
  10. Itch Is Being Flooded By AI-Generated Garbage
  11. Bad Flock Info Leads Police To Tow Wrong Car, Then Towing Company Totals It
  12. Rocky Linux Creator Built a New ‘Not Linux’ Kernel in 11 Days Using AI
  13. Experts Expect ‘Security Reckoning’ As AI Tools Find And Exploit Software Bugs
  14. Binance Reopens to $3.64 in Net Outflows. ‘98% Choose to Stay’, Says Its Founder
  15. Stack Overflow: ‘Reports of Our Death are Greatly Exaggerated’

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Snap Reaches Settlement In Social Media Addiction Lawsuit Ahead of Trial

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Snap has settled a lawsuit brought by two teenagers who alleged Snapchat was deliberately designed to be addictive and contributed to their mental health problems, avoiding a trial that was scheduled to begin this week. Snap was the last defendant to settle after Meta, Alphabet and TikTok resolved claims in the same case. CBS News reports:
The teenage plaintiffs, identified in court documents as S.J. and K.D.B., had alleged in the suit that Snapchat was designed to be addictive and that using the platform from a young age contributed to their mental health issues. “We are glad to reach resolution for our clients,” Mark Lanier, founder of The Lanier Law Firm and lead counsel for the plaintiffs, said in a statement to CBS News. “We believe this jury would have found the companies’ conduct reprehensible.”

Snap was the last social media company named in the lawsuit to settle the case, which was set for opening arguments this week. Meta resolved claims last week, while Alphabet and TikTok, the other defendants, each also resolved the allegations. Terms of the Snap settlement were undisclosed […].
Earlier this year, a jury found Meta and Google-owned YouTube liable in a landmark social media addiction lawsuit, awarding $6 million in damages to a young woman who alleged the platforms’ addictive features harmed her mental health. In August, Meta also agreed to pay up to $18 billion in settlements and introduce new child-safety measures to resolve claims from dozens of U.S. states that it deliberately designed Facebook and Instagram to addict children while misleading the public about their risks.

Study Claims Vizio Simply Ignores ‘Smart’ TV Spying Opt Out Requests

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Techdirt:
Recently, reports emerged that LG TVs are sniffing around your local network, and even listening to your local environment, even when the TV is purportedly “off.” Some of those voice commands were then stored in plain text and uploaded to the internet. LG’s response? To deny everything. […] That latter point is central to a new study out of Northeastern that conducted 5,943 experiments across twelve commercial “smart” TV devices. The researchers found that most smart TVs utilize automatic content recognition (ACR), a technology that captures audio or video snapshots of viewed content and then monetizes that data to help build personalized profiles of viewers.

TV makers insist that users are supposed to be able to opt out, but the choice simply doesn’t work across a large segment of TVs. Companies like Vizio simply ignored the consumer requests entirely more often than not: “We find that the advertised ACR opt-out fully suppresses ACR-attributable traffic on only four operating systems; on Samsung Tizen traffic consistent with ACR activity persists in more than 60% of evaluated scenarios, and on Vizio SmartCast a content correlated endpoint hosted on Amazon Kinesis continues to receive traffic in 100% of opted-out scenarios.”

[…] The researchers say since they can’t see the precise scope of what’s being collected due to encryption, they’re unsure whether Vizio is technically violating its FTC agreement (not that we have a current FTC that would care if they were): “The opt-out setting has no observable effect on traffic sent to this endpoint; however, we cannot inspect the payload due to encryption so we cannot confirm whether this violates the FTC settlement.” Results of whether opting out of ACR tracking actually stopped ACR tracking were all over the map. Roku, for example, ignores opt-out requests when users are watching Roku’s own channels. None of the smart TV vendors track Netflix viewing for fear of violating agreements with the streaming giant. Samsung’s opt out function was more likely to actually work when a user was watching antenna broadcasts.

On two Smart TV platforms, personal viewing data collected by ACR remains unencrypted, despite years of bad press and scandal on the subject. Many appear to be violating the law, but because U.S. regulatory oversight has been gutted, they see no meaningful accountability. That includes smart TV OS’ like VIDAA, which is most prominently found on Hisense and Toshiba smart TVs: “VIDAA OS sends ACR data to servers run by Unruly over MQTT without encryption, so anyone on the network path between the TV and those servers can read it. Each message carries a Client ID, a permanent identifier for the TV that can’t be reset, along with the time zone, the app name, the input (antenna, HDMI), the antenna channel and an audio fingerprint.”

Don’t Buy Vizio

By Bob_Who • • Score: 3 • Thread

Boycott Scumbags.

This is what keeps me on projectors.

By TigerPlish • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

This is the biggest thing that keeps me on projectors.

At least for now, the projectors I buy are dumb as a brick, and apple TV is also pretty dumb, it doens’t have ACR. My HTPC is from 2011, it’s positively jurassic, so it also is not gonna rat me out.

There is zero incentive for me to add a “TV” to this house. none. If I needed a 2nd display, i’d find the gnarliest, largerst “monitor” and use that.

I knew the programming content in TV had quickly gone to shit once the Reality Show became a thing but the hardware has suffered tremendously since the days of CRT Trinitrons.

I really want no part of this TV future. Those affected, sharpen your suing pencils, fight the good fight, ‘tho all you’ll get is a dime for every million dollars they make. Good luck, and all that.

Re:Just don’t connect it.

By taustin • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

At which point, it will probably look for alternate open WiFi that’s not restricted.

Best to not buy a smart TV at all.

Start collecting

By RitchCraft • • Score: 3 • Thread

It’s time to start collecting old TVs. For the last 10 years you could get old flat screen TVs for damn near nothing or free. I have a nice 60” hanging on my wall that is 8 years old given to me by a friend that upgraded. I have a 55” curved Samsung that is 10 years old (got it free), a 50” Insignia that is at least 10 years old (got it free), a 40” Samsung that I purchased new from Newegg back in 2010 (my first flat screen TV), and a 32” Viewsonic that is over 10 years old (again, free). Craigslist is dead (at least in my neck of the woods) and shipping through eBay is impossible so people have a hard time unloading old large TVs. Get out there, get them, and hold on to them until this illegal spyware BS is stopped. None of my TVs are connected to a network (I only use two of the TVs, the others are spares). I have a NAS with all my media and computers that I purchased off-lease for damn near nothing (Most are 6th gen i7s) to repurpose as HTPCs to run Kodi. If you are knowledgeable help others out with setups like this. If you need help seek it out. My media, no commercials, no cable bill. The irony is LG stands for Life is Good. Nope. My setup makes life good.

Apple HomeView Ultra, Drone and Laundry-Folding Robot Reportedly In Development

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
According to The Information, Apple is developing a $1,000 HomeView Ultra smart home hub with a 9-inch touchscreen mounted on a motorized arm that can follow users around a room and autonomously respond to its surroundings. It’s also said to be experimenting with more ambitious home robots, including a wheeled robot that follows people, a smart home drone and a machine capable of folding laundry. Notebookcheck reports:
According to the report, HomeView Ultra will feature a larger 9-inch touchscreen mounted on a robotic arm. This arm can automatically turn the screen toward the user. With a camera and several sensors, this smart home hub is said to be “fully aware” of its surroundings and capable of acting autonomously. This autonomy ranges from turning on the lights when someone enters the room to shooing a cat away when it jumps onto a table. These sensors are also intended to prevent the arm from hitting nearby objects with the display.

Apple is reportedly currently planning to announce this smart home hub in 2027 for around $1,000, but according to The Information, its launch could be delayed until 2028. The reason is allegedly the software, which has not yet been finalized, while the hardware is said to be ready for market already.

I’d rather....

By b0s0z0ku • • Score: 3 • Thread
I’d rather live in a rat and roach infested hovel than allow a “cleaning” (aka surveillance) clanker into my home. And no, I don’t have an Echo, nor a smart vacuum. Thankfully. Ludd is good.

Cat Herder

By cruff • • Score: 3 • Thread
Someone got tired of their cat(s) being on the counter. They’ve invented a cat nanny and the execs tacked on a bunch of other useless features.

SpaceX Is Reportedly Looking At Buying Boost Mobile

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
SpaceX has reportedly held talks with EchoStar about acquiring Boost Mobile or gaining access to its network, potentially giving Starlink a shortcut toward becoming a full-fledged U.S. mobile carrier. Engadget reports:
According to Washington Post’s sources, the deal could look like SpaceX acquiring Boost Mobile outright or gaining access to its cell network, which is leased from AT&T and T-Mobile. There could be a major hitch with the deal though, since SpaceX’s potential mobile service would need the green light from those major mobile carriers, according to the report. The Washington Post also reported that major cell companies, which include AT&T, T-Mobile and Verizon, have already turned down Musk down for access to its cell networks in order to launch a separate SpaceX service.
Last month, SpaceX reportedly held talks with Crown Castle to access at least 80,000 cellular tower sites across the U.S. as it prepares to launch Starlink Mobile. “We will be building out our terrestrial networks so there’s broad-based connectivity anywhere that SpaceX and Starlink are allowed to operate,” Musk said during SpaceX’s earnings call this week. Satellite launches plus spectrum acquisition “will pave the way for Starlink Mobile to become a major mobile carrier in the US,” he said.

Sherman Act

By b0s0z0ku • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
Time to go full-on T.R. trust-buster on Elon Musk and the companies he controls. He’s gotten too big for his britches - countries where the tall poppy gets scythed down have the correct approach.

Re:Sherman Act

By Archangel Michael • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

So, Three companies good, four is anti-competitive? When T-Mobile bought Sprint, where you for or against that merger?

Just wanting the logic here.

Re:Why though, Starlink should working everywhere.

By edi_guy • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

SpaceX spent about $10-15 billion on the current number of starlink sattelites. And now they need to spend billions more on a third rate cell phone leasee ? Given that there are only three actual networks, Verizon, ATT, T-mobile and that you can get a Mint plan for $10-$15/mo before taxes, and cell signal coverage is not really a problem for 99% of the population 99% of the time.. I really don’t get the business case.

Feels like a Virgin Corp sorta play. They wanted to brand a bunch of stuff, where it was just their brand and nothing value-add. Virgin mobile, Virgin money, Virgin America airlines. But who really wants to be Musk or X-branded?

Re:Wrong title

By ArchieBunker • • Score: 4, Informative • Thread

“What day/night will be the wildest party on your island?” Musk wrote in an email to Epstein in November 2012, according to the newly released files.

https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/e…

Patrick Boyle explained to this

By rsilvergun • • Score: 4, Informative • Thread
He has a good video about the SpaceX IPO where he explains it. Basically it’s very expensive for SpaceX to provide data services of any kind. They cannot compete with terrestrial data services when those are an option. Nobody is going to pay extra for satellite internet when they can just have a physical line to their house or apartment or can have access to Cellular radio service.

The market for SpaceX is people that do not have access to terrestrial services because they’re out in the boondocks and they don’t have any other options. That market exists however it’s got a cap because if you ever get enough people in a single area that form a large addressable market then somebody runs some cable to them or builds cell towers and suddenly you just lost your market.

Mr Boyle brought this up in the context of how SpaceX cannot possibly generate enough income to justify its valuation and that it’s very likely that SpaceX is just a scam to rip off our retirement savings and our 401ks.

But getting back to the point they’re not going to use starlink for cellular internet because it can’t compete with regular cellular service. It’s just too expensive to keep all those satellites going.

OpenAI Might Rebrand Its Data Centers As ‘AI Compute Campuses’

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from TechCrunch:
Data centers are deeply unpopular. But what if we called them something else? Axios reports that OpenAI is preparing a “PR blitz” for after the midterm elections on Tuesday, as Democrats seem likely to win back the House of Representatives, and possibly the Senate, too. The company’s chief global affairs officer Chris Lehane told Axios that the midterms will be “a bit of a movie trailer for what you’re going to see in 2028,” when he expects AI to be “the issue” in the presidential election.

So OpenAI is to influence the AI debate moving forward, with Lehane discussing several proposals, including the development of AI “speed limits”; finding ways to help people see AI as empowering them in their daily lives; pushing the U.S. to take a role in developing global standards; and yes — rebranding data centers as “AI compute campuses.” Lehane also described the conversation around data centers (a debate that has pushed Amazon and Microsoft to say they will no longer use NDAs in their negotiations with local governments) as “good and healthy.” “Communities should hold companies responsible and accountable so they really and truly get a transformative benefit from these projects,” he said.

go all the way

By awwshit • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

These are not data centers. These are dorms for autonomous superintelligent beings. You wouldn’t hurt an Agent, would you?

Don’t you mean…

By Comboman • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread

>>OpenAI Might Rebrand Its Data Centers As ‘AI Compute Campuses’

Umm, don’t you mean “SI (Super Intelligence) Compute Campuses”? That rebrand didn’t work so I guess they’re trying again.

Re:Alternative branding

By Retired Chemist • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread
Apparently, a lot of people. They keep voting for idiots.

Idiots.

By MachineShedFred • • Score: 3 • Thread

“Hey, let’s ignore the actual problems of why people are against us building data centers everywhere, and instead we’ll just change the name!”

And then they wonder why people want to screw these guys with their pants on. Renaming the thing doesn’t materially change the thing, and just pisses people off because you clearly see there is a problem, and choose not to address the problem and instead play games.

That makes it better…

By gweihir • • Score: 4, Funny • Thread

May I suggest a few more names?
“Breadless bakeries” - They surely generate enough heat
“Sound distribution centers” - Apparently, these are really loud
“Landscape heaters” - See above
“Silicon stress test facilities” - Nothing wrong with testing stuff, right?

The New York Times Sues Brave Web Browser For AI Scraping, Bypassing Paywalls

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
The New York Times and several other publishers have sued (PDF) Brave Software, accusing the browser maker of scraping their websites without permission and helping users bypass paywalls. The Verge reports:
According to a complaint (PDF) filed by the companies that run New York Daily News, the Chicago Tribune, and the Orlando Sentinel, Brave Software has monetized its index of scraped websites by, in part, providing AI companies with paid access to “real-time online content from the Brave Index.” The AI companies then use that index to train their models, access content to “respond to specific user queries,” or both. Brave has allegedly provided “stolen copyrighted content” to “many” AI companies including Anthropic, Perplexity, Mistral, xAI, and Cohere. Brave also promotes “hundreds of top publishers” as being accessible through its “Paywall blocker” feature in its browser.

“Brave has never asked for the Publishers’ permission to access their websites, much less to copy the material and provide it to users or other AI companies,” the complaint says. “On the contrary, as noted above, Brave allows its users to bypass the Publishers’ paywalls without their consent, and has taken other steps that prevent the Publishers from blocking Brave’s access to the Publishers’ websites. Brave has never compensated the Publishers for the unlawful use, copying, and distribution of the Publishers’ copyrighted content.”
“While we believe in the ethical and responsible use and development of AI, Brave has flouted established copyright law and ignored repeated requests by The Times to stop its infringing conduct,” Graham James, an NYT spokesperson, says in a statement. “We filed this lawsuit to hold Brave accountable for stealing our content to power its own products and to provide it to some of the most prominent and well resourced generative AI companies in the world.”

Re:I use Firefox

By Himmy32 • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

And unsurprisingly the New York Times isn’t super worried about the tiny segment of population bypassing through sketchy Russian sites. But the whole market lost billions of dollars last week because of how much money AI answers are sucking out of advertising and subscriptions. Google lost half of a trillion dollars in value. That’s big enough of an issue to generate lawsuits.

All of this is unsurprising as the the value proposition for Brave from the start was removing the monetization strategies of content makers. At some point someone needs to pay either with subscriptions or advertising eyeball time.

Unfortunate that Brave Search will also be affected as the “Brave Index” powers both the API for LLMs and the search engine, which is one of the few that the results haven’t been slowly getting worse.

Big guy going after the little guy - precedent

By Puls4r • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
This is classic “big guy” going after the “little guy” in the hopes that they can use their money and clout to financially bury Brave. And when they manage to do it, they’ve set a precedent they can use in other court cases. Fuck the New York Times. Fuck their new “fair and balanced” bullshit. Direct quote from them: “expand its coverage of conservative viewpoints”

I see this as 2 different issues

By dirk • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

The first issue is if the only thing it takes to get around these sites paywalls is disabling some scripts, then they don’t have a paywall at all. There are ways to put your content behind a paywall so it cannot be accessed (see porn sites). If they are just running a script to stop you, then I have no issue with Brave disabling that script to allow users to run the page without it. Sorry NYT, get a better paywall.

The second issue is the bigger one. If they are truly accessing these sites and scaping the data and offering it to other companies, that is an entirely different thing. That is basically taking the content and redistributing it, which is a huge deal. I would side with the NYT on that one.

The NYT CEO is an entitled prick

By stevenm86 • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread
Yeah, I realize the irony of the subject line, coming from someone who wholeheartedly embraces ad blocking and paywall bypassing. But I’ve had the “pleasure” of listening to a radio interview with top NYT leadership (owner? CEO?) a few years ago, and this guy may as well have been on another planet. The magical thinking and mental gymnastics were off the scale. “I don’t understand why people don’t want to pay us, it’s a few dollars a day, a cup of coffee a day!”. Not an entirely unreasonable statement by itself, but it was dropped in the same breath as whining about disinformation and living in a world that is not shaped by people having access to quality journalism. Does nobody see the irony here? Fox News will always be free. Brieieieitbart will always be free. Fake news will always be free. And you’re whining that people believe that stuff while embracing paywalls and using increasingly aggressive bait-and-switch tactics like “here’s an article wait no nvm pony up”.

Re:Screw the New York Times

By hierofalcon • • Score: 4, Informative • Thread

I don’t have a problem with digital distribution of news. I subscribed to the print WSJ for a very long time. But with our wonderful US mail service, the print edition would arrive in batches, days late. It became worthless. So I switched to digital once monitors got a high enough resolution that I could read the print edition in digital format. I still skip the ads. It’s even faster to right arrow over full page ads now than to turn a page manually, and it’s available first thing in the morning instead of when I get off work and already stale by a day or more depending on the US mail. So I’m a fan of digital news.

But the WSJ exists because of their content and price points. A bloomberg terminal is out of my price range. The WSJ is okay for budget conscious people. If it had a comics page I’d be even happier. And I suspect that providing some of their content to the world - say a few articles a month - doesn’t hurt them much. A bundle with IBD and Barron’s is pretty reasonable.

But I gave up on the local paper quite a while ago. Too little local news coverage, and anything important was going to be in the WSJ anyway. And their subscription price for a year was higher than WSJ.

I suppose there are a few columnists in the NYT or daily that people don’t think they can live without, but it is really about content for every newspaper. If you provide timely content that is unique and worthwhile, people will pay for a subscription. If you don’t, or are just one of many AP or other news feed suppliers, you shouldn’t be surprised when nobody wants to subscribe. But it is also largely about reputation. People aren’t going to sign up for a subscription or expose an e-mail address just to view an article. If you are worthwhile, people will subscribe on their own. But they aren’t likely to subscribe to some unknown paper (or even a well known paper like the NYT) if they don’t need it for local news. I live a long way from NYC. I might read an article if it was free, but I have no interest in paying a subscription price for all the NYC local content that doesn’t matter to me.

Microsoft’s Canada Timezone Troubles Leave Admins Fixing Calendars, Pretending They’re In Bogota

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Microsoft is scrambling to fix time-zone problems across Outlook, Power Automate, Fabric, SharePoint and other products after parts of Canada stopped observing seasonal clock changes on November 1. “The company has confirmed problems across a chunk of its software estate, leaving some customers facing incorrect times, broken schedules and a collection of workarounds while Redmond catches up,” reports The Register. From the report:
Outlook users have been left with the most homework. Switching to the new Canadian time zones won’t automatically update existing calendar entries, meaning that meetings scheduled after November 1 are potentially an hour out of whack. Microsoft advises users to change their Outlook calendar time zone, then update upcoming events and meetings to use it. For meetings involving other people, only the organizer can make the change.

Recurring meetings come with an additional treat: changing the time zone resets any previously moved occurrences, which then have to be recreated. Anyone with a calendar full of recurring meetings may wish to put the kettle on first. Microsoft is working on an Exchange Online PowerShell cmdlet to remediate non-recurring meetings, but according to its guidance, that’s not due until later this week. A fix for recurring meetings remains “in development,” with an ETA yet to be confirmed.

Things get stranger with Power Automate and Fabric, where Microsoft’s temporary fix involves pretending you’re somewhere else entirely. Depending on the product and province, that could mean Saskatchewan, Arizona or, for Manitobans, Bogota. Because apparently time zones weren’t confusing enough already. SharePoint On-Prem customers, meanwhile, have to wait until November 10 for the correct time zones to arrive, while Power Pages users could see server-formatted dates appear an hour out until a service fix lands. Microsoft’s current milestone for that is December 12.

As a Canuck .....

By DaveyJJ • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

I did love the recent headline in The Beaverton (our version of The Onion).

No one in Canada knows what time it is anywhere else in Canada

Re:Can’t we define the timezone as a UTC offset?

By Kernel Kurtz • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

Can’t we define the timezone as a UTC offset? I thought WIndows, macOS and Linux all allowed that?

On Linux in this case you can use the Etc/GMT+5 timezone (note the POSIX inversion is not a typo), which is a permanent UTC-5 with no DST changes.

Actually is a hard problem, fault of politicians

By caseih • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

This is actually a much harder problem to address than it would seem. Obviously if the remote meeting event was in, say New York, and I find myself in a place where MDT is now year round, a simple time zone conversion is all that’s needed and nothing breaks so long as the local client has an updated time zone list. But if the meeting was scheduled in a city that is now part of a different time zone, now it’s off for everyone all over the world. And there’s no easy way for the calendaring system to know the difference between those two scenarios. So we have a mess for sure, and it’s a mess of a just a few politicians’ making.

Re:Those who cannot remember the past…

By acroyear • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

The ‘prior art’ is not y2k but rather the DST change in 2006 (to our current weekends in North America).

That was when they restructured most of their timezone information into easily updated files that made the operating system generally adapt pretty quickly, along with client-side software for anything *newly* generated in scheduling software.

However, the issues here are what to do about already-existing scheduled events - how do they adapt depends on what your internal model is for storing “where” they are (which timezone they’re meant to follow). If you didn’t separate out America/Vancouver in your system because it was always the same as America/Los_Angeles…it is an almost unfixable problem because you have no way to isolate what is and isn’t in “Canada”.

So this is why I’ve been saying, for months now since it was announced, that it was going to be a mess because there wasn’t enough time to develop and test the solutions in the middle of all of the other work that app teams are doing (often with reduced resources due to the layoffs of the last 3 years) before everything went live. You really want this stuff tested AT LEAST 6 months before the first change, preferably a full year.

I can’t imagine the scheduling disasters for anybody actually using Egypt time over the last 15 years, when they ditched DST, *partially* brought it back (the day would change based on Ramadan) and then in March of ‘23 announced that in April of ‘23 they would go back to switching. Pretty sure anybody of any import just set their clocks collectively to something from Europe for the stability.

Re:Can’t we define the timezone as a UTC offset?

By kqs • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread

I don’t really agree. Timezones, DST, and TZ definitions are very well understood. Every year several (mostly small) countries make last-minute TZ changes and they get pushed out and handled; this is not new and untested tech. Sure we need some level of QA; we always need more testing! but changing a TZ file has very few side effects. All internal time info is already stored at UTC, so the TZ changes how it is displayed but not how it is consumed or calculated. MS did not push out critical changes for a rather major country, despite having sufficient time and incentive. And the change was not difficult or fragile.

Marvell to Buy Lumentum In $115 Billion Bet On AI Connectivity

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Marvell has agreed to acquire optical components maker Lumentum in an all-stock deal with an implied enterprise value of $115 billion. “AI infrastructure is undergoing a fundamental architectural shift toward optical connectivity, creating an opportunity that comes along once in a generation,” said Marvell Chairman and CEO Matt Murphy. “The companies that move first and help define this transition will set the standard for decades to come.” CNBC reports:
Through the acquisition, Marvell said it can combine electrical and optical technologies to meet accelerating and shifting AI connectivity demands across regions and systems. Companies are increasingly relying on optical connections to piece together chips used to run and train large language models. Lumentum shareholders will receive 4.5 Marvell shares for each Lumentum share under the agreement. The deal is expected to close during the first half of 2028. Marvell’s takeover marks one of the most significant bets on AI in 2026 and comes despite recent concerns over the long-term sustainability of infrastructure spending.

Re: Surprise!

By drinkypoo • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

This is probably a good buy regardless. Interconnects have generally been going optical.

“Don’t build, buy”

By jacks smirking reven • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

Once again a large existing player instead of building new tech and maybe even innovating and making some competition and playing in the market just throws it’s money around and buys it’s way in and now we have more consolidation and less competition and the market gets smaller. The losers here once again are the public at large.

Just stop companies from buying other companies, a full moratorium for a couple decades until we can figure out what the hell is going on. I don’t think there has a been a beneficial (to consumers and competitive markets) merger or acquisition in my lifetime.

Re:Big acquisitions did create the initial innovat

By jacks smirking reven • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread

That’s kind of exactly my point, I don’t think it’s healthy for our economy to have business startup and get venture capital on the sole idea of “lets just try and get bought by a larger company”. I think that outlook and the venture capital backing it up has led to a lot of negatives. Again I would ask which merger/acquisition has overall been beneficial and to whom and why?

If the idea and the people are good it should be able to get investment on it’s own right? It should be able to get into a self sustaining business right? Why couldn’t Lumentum just sign a fat licensing agreement with Marvell? The answer is because a buyout snuffs out any competitors from also using it.

why should you have any say in whether or not they can sell THEIR company?

If it wasn’t apparent for some reason I am talking on a law/policy level. The entire idea of a corporation and the fact they are allowed to buy eachother is built in law and statute. It’s not in nature, it’s not even in The Constitution. The entire ability to be an S-Corp or a C-Corp or an LLC is due to the fact that we created those things and allow that in our laws so therefore we are allowed to change those laws.

Supermarket Freezers Across Europe Hit By Second Suspected Cyberattack

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Guardian:
Supermarket chains in Sweden, Belgium and Luxembourg have said the temperatures of their refrigerators and freezers in dozens of stores rose overnight, prompting fears of a cyber-attack similar to one that caused millions of euros of food losses in France. Sweden’s Coop chain told the daily Aftonbladet on Monday that six of its stores had been affected, while ICA said it was “aware that a limited number of stores were affected by an incident overnight which impacted their refrigeration and freezer systems”.

The Dutch retailer Ahold Delhaize, which last month reported a cybersecurity incident to police in the Netherlands, said an “IT incident” had hit fridges and freezers in dozens of its supermarkets in Belgium and Luxembourg. A company spokesperson, Sarah De Meester, said the supermarket chain had established that temperatures in the cooling systems had increased, adding that the incident was being investigated. Belgium’s Le Soir newspaper reported that dozens of stores and supermarkets were affected, including five Spar outlets, multiple Shop & Go convenience stores attached to Q8 service stations, and a number of smaller Proxy Delhaize minimarkets.
“We started mobilizing technicians at 1am,” Stephan Moelans, the chief executive of Sabcobel, which specialises in refrigeration system installations, told the paper. “We spent all night and morning disconnecting the affected installations from the grid.”

Has Battlestar Galactica taught us nothing

By overblod • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
Decouple, we need to disconnect, this war will be survived by those who are disconnected. Those are the future of humanity.

Cyberfreezers

By TwistedGreen • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

The temperatures of these freezers need to have a centralised audit trail, to comply with foodchain regulations.

Sometimes you have to do something silly just because the insurance companies demand an audit trail. As usual, accountants are to blame.

This is just AI doing it’s thing.

By Fly Swatter • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread
Someone secretly put AI in charge of the system and told it to reduce costs. Since AI doesn’t consume food it inferred that humans don’t need food either.

Re:Beyond stupid

By MIPSPro • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
Golf courses, MBAs, hot sales girls, lobotomies, corporate conformity, frat boys with no brain cells, lots of reasons....

Re:So dumb

By Big Bipper • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread
What is really dumb is the idea that a device designed to always keep its contents at a specific temperature would ever need to have that temperature changed remotely. Set it once for wherever it’s location and contents require and it never has to change. Maybe have an on/off switch if it’s used seasonally, but why, for instance, does ice cream have to be kept at one temperature today and a different one next week ?

Itch Is Being Flooded By AI-Generated Garbage

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
The number of game pages being created per-day on Itch has doubled, the indie games site announced Saturday on Bluesky. When asked why, they responded: “take a guess.”

As the gaming news site Aftermath puts it, “the surge has been almost entirely down to AI-created garbage racing onto the platform as the popularity of vibe-coded theft, copycats and machine-built slop explodes.”
Back in 2024, when the spectre of AI-‘created’ video games was still in its infancy, indie platform itch.io decided that the best it could do to combat this growing threat was, like Valve has done with Steam, institute a voluntary ‘AI’ filter when adding new projects to the site. By November 2026, as itch buckles under the weight of new AI-generated ‘games’ pouring onto the site, that filter is proving about as robust as a wet paper bag.... Shopfronts are being deluged by this shit, and it’s making it a terrible user experience for customers.

And while in Valve’s case there’s a compelling case for stronger human moderation of the store, I’m not sure that’s a viable option for a relatively tiny, community-run platform like itch… [A]t time of writing I visited the latest releases section and there was still a huge number of clearly AI-generated titles (or titles making extensive use of AI in their visual assets) which made no use of itch’s voluntary tag system.

The issue here isn’t that these games are making money—itch themselves say in a reply that while the number of projects listed has doubled, “the number of downloads and purchases has not"—it’s that an inability to combat this surge makes the site worse for every single person using it. It gets harder to find real games, for example, and it also makes the shopfront look like a clearance rack.

Gatekeeping

By sourcerror • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

The whole schtick of Itch.io was that it had less gatekeeping than Steam, so if Steam has an issue with the flood of AI slop, Itch has an even bigger issue.

Re:Gatekeeping

By AmiMoJo • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

It’s more of a quality issue. An AI generated game could be good, it’s just that because the barrier to entry is so low now, literally just type a prompt and then complain about the things that don’t work right, that people with lame ideas and copycats are not dissuaded by the effort required.

You can’t put it back in a bottle.

By FictionPimp • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Software development as we know it is ending. AI tools are ‘good enough’ that any idea can be made fairly quickly with even limited knowledge. This opens up a lot of opportunities for creativity and itch scratching while at the same time impacting the commercial value of software. I’m shocked the open source community doesn’t see this as a pivital moment for free software.

For example, recently I wanted to play nethack on my m1 mac. I also wanted to use a tileset. Finding no good OSX arm based clients, I spun one up in a week with a custom tileset that I tweaked to my likings and even added graphical features to represent the true ‘size’ of items and creatures in the game.

Now I’m fully capable of building that solution by hand, it would have taken a month or two, but I would have needed to find a like minded person who knows how to build graphics and shared the same visual inspirations and goals I had. That would have probably just caused me to end the idea. Instead I scratched that itch and have been playing nethack a ton more and I’m happy. I released the code as open source so anyone who cares to can play with it.

To me that is real value and not ‘slop’.

I’m not so sure

By rsilvergun • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread
Right now we’ve had AI generated games for at least a year maybe longer. And so far the only ones that could be considered at all okay all the ones that are just ripping off a game that somebody made.

I don’t think you can make a good game with AI. The guys who made super meat boy spent months manually tweaking the gameplay mechanics to make it feel good.

Human beings are just too analog and complex. You are not going to be able to tell a computer to make something fun and it’s going to do it. Now what you can’t do is point a computer at something that is already fun and it can copy it but that’s just going to be a pale imitation.

It’s like all this Sonic the hedgehog rip off games from the ‘90s. They were all pretty terrible. The best AI can do is make Bubsy.

Re:I’m not so sure

By FictionPimp • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Using AI is a wide spectrum.

You can easily use AI to make great video games, just like you can use AI to write any other software. Just like you can use intellisense for code completion and still make great video games.

The thing that determines if a product is great is the people involved in the process who understand the business case, the expected work product, and the spirit of the goal. So I’m 100% for a game company using AI to help it write code and create the building blocks of a game. Like any product code needs reviews, graphics need tweaked, the software needs to be tested and product tested.

So yes, if you one shot a game with AI and do no testing or tweaking it’s going to be shit. If you use it appropriately like any other tool you can accelerate your deliverable and make fine products.

I think we will see some games crafted with love that leveraged AI for the parts that are less interesting. For example someone with talent in graphic design and writing who has a wonderful idea for a turn based RPG, but isn’t sure how to make Unity work leverages AI to turn that story and art into something fun. It would be great if everyone could find people who believed in their ideas and worked with them, but often all you find are people who tell you nothing will work. Sometimes you have to go it alone and AI is making that easier.

Bad Flock Info Leads Police To Tow Wrong Car, Then Towing Company Totals It

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
“Police continue to blindly trust Flock cameras above and beyond the evidence in front of their own eyes,” reports Jalopnik.com.

“After incorrectly connecting Rosalyn Crump’s car to a shooting that had occurred the previous day, police had her car towed and impounded as evidence, reports Moneywise…”
According to WWBT 12 On Your Side, Richmond, Virginia, police didn’t have a license plate number for the suspect’s car, making it impossible to search Flock’s records for that plate. Flock cameras collect more than just license plate information, so police searched for a make, model, color, and approximate model year. Based on this extremely vague description, police zeroed in on Crump’s 2012 Hyundai Elantra. Around 2 a.m. they started looking through the windows with flashlights to see what was in plain sight, which isn’t technically a “search” — at least, not one that would require a warrant… [Crump was asleep, but left her home to speak to the police officers to tell them they had the wrong car. But they didn’t believe her.]

Other body cam footage shows an officer expressing doubt that Crump’s car is the right one, since child seats and other items inside seem inconsistent with a shooting. Another officer replies, “Don’t be surprised if they would have set that up like that.” Instead of believing the evidence, or Crump, or interviewing witnesses who could have corroborated her story, police called Seibert’s Towing to impound the car…

[Later] Police identified a similar-looking car that seemed to be actually connected to the shooting, and released Crump’s Elantra. Nobody actually told Crump this until four days later. Seibert’s told Moneywise that police didn’t actually release the car until then. Either way, they didn’t tell her that Seibert’s had ripped the front bumper off during the towing process — leaving the car undrivable — until she arrived to pick it up. Seibert’s took responsibility for causing the cosmetic damage, and was willing to cover the $2,212.30 bill to paint and replace the bumper cover, fog lights, and wheel liners. Then Crump asked for a full mechanical inspection, which revealed damaged tie rods and ball joints, jacking the bill beyond $6,000. Seibert’s says it didn’t cause this damage. Regardless of how it occurred, Seibert’s insurer and Crump agree that her Hyundai is now a total loss due to the cost of the repairs it needs. It had been drivable, if mechanically worn, before police ordered it towed, damaging it for nothing more than a case of mistaken identity.
The president of Seibert’s towing told Moneywise that while they’d originally offered $2,200 to repair the bumper damage, Crump must now negotiate with their insurance company. Crump has now resorted to a GoFundMe campaign to attempt to raise $17,100 for rental car expenses, a new car, and the expenses of moving to a different neighborhood. 130 donors have already contributed $7,431.

Reached for comment, the Richmond Police Department told local newscasters they “understand that Ms. Crump did not ask to become part of this investigation,” and that they recognize the “frustration of having a vehicle towed and subsequently damaged.” But they also said they were following a “credible” lead, which is their responsibility. The department “appreciates Ms. Crump’s cooperation” (and “sincerely hopes the remaining concerns about her vehicle can be resolved.”)

The city of Richmond has “already started backing away from Flock before Crump’s story aired,” reports Moneywise. “Mayor Danny Avula has decided not to renew Richmond’s license plate reader deal with Flock, which ends June 30, 2027. As of September, the city had 99 Flock readers on its streets.”

They note that the Institute for Justice, a public interest law firm in Arlington, Virginia, “has tallied at least 27 cases since 2018” of similar police errors. “In each case, a license plate reader mistake led police to stop, jail or point guns at drivers who’d done nothing wrong. More than half came in 2023 or later.”

Re:Sigh

By ArchieBunker • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

No, they’re stupid. https://abcnews.com/US/court-o…

The establishment wants a hammer to use against the populace. Police are the hammer.

Re:Sigh

By ArchieBunker • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

Judge clarifies it was rape. https://www.theguardian.com/us…

Re: Sigh

By fluffernutter • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
There could be a picture of Trump with Epstein’s dick in his mouth, his supporters would still claim association isn’t the same as guilt.

Re:Well… there’s a lot wrong here

By CubicleZombie • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

How do you not know how to tow a car without totalling it?

They were most likely using a sling wrecker. That’s the type with a tow bar and those wide strips that hang down from the boom - kind of what you think of when you imagine a tow truck. Those are relics from the 70’s when cars had huge chrome bumpers and solid frames.

Today they (should) use a wheel lift. That’s the type with the bar that goes under the car and lifts from the tires.

I worked at a towing shop in Richmond in the 90’s when I was in college there (not Seiberts, but I remember them). It was the sketchiest shop in the city, we only had sling wreckers, and our quality of drivers reflected that we were the only shop in town that didn’t drug test. Half of my job was fixing the damage that the drivers did when towing illegally parked cars. They’d hook the steering tie rods, bending them, and then winch it up with the sling and rip the bumper cover off.

Nothing here is newsworthy except that it started from a Flock camera.

Re: Well… there’s a lot wrong here

By drinkypoo • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

No they absolutely are not. First, they chose to take the contract with the police. Second, they chose to employ an incompetent. The driver should have determined it unsafe to tow with his equipment.

Rocky Linux Creator Built a New ‘Not Linux’ Kernel in 11 Days Using AI

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
From the blog It’s FOSS
Gregory Kurtzer is no stranger to the Linux world. He created CentOS, and when Red Hat messed it up, he started Rocky Linux as the community replacement. He also co-founded CIQ, the company offering enterprise support around Rocky. His latest project has nothing to do with rebuilding another Linux distro, though. He has built an entirely new operating system kernel, and he didn’t write most of the code himself. An AI agent did.

Meet Ginux, Linux userspace without Linux underneath… It’s an independent, Rust-first x86-64 kernel. Which simply means it is NOT a fork of the Linux kernel. It has its own memory management, scheduler, process model, filesystems, networking, and device support, all written from scratch.

The most interesting part is that even though it is not Linux, it is Linux-compatible. Ginux implements the Linux ABI (the binary interface compiled programs use to talk to the kernel), so existing Linux binaries can run on it unmodified. In the project’s own terms, Linux is a “personality” that Ginux exposes, not the kernel running underneath…

Right now, Ginux runs only in a QEMU virtual machine, with no physical hardware profile, no GPU or NVMe support, and no independent security audit.

Re: all written from scratch?

By chefren • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

It’s not about uniqueness. If you take a photo of a pretty tree and post it online, you obviously own the copyright to that photo. If I find that same tree and take my own photo of it under very similar circumstances, and publish that, then my photo is still mine and I own the copyright to it, even though it’s not very unique.

On the other hand if I take your photo and edit it with Photoshop to be subtly different, and publish it, I am in breach of your copyright. Even if those two hyopthetical photos I produced end up identical, one is in breach of copyright and one is not.

The question is whether I copy your work or not, and as you don’t own any IP related to the subject (a tree), I am perfectly in my rights to take my own photo of that same tree.

Re: all written from scratch?

By T34L • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

The goal is to

Cool, and my grandma’s goal could have very well been to win the Tour De France, yet it still didn’t make her any more bicycle-like.

I do not need to encode 1 + 1 = 2 in order to solve for 2.

Do you have any proof of that? Because vast majority of people definitely see various forms of “1 + 1 = 2” repeat many times before they get to the level where they can derive that formula themselves, and I’d argue it’s fairly easy to prove that vast majority of people actually remember that “1 + 1 = 2” and don’t derive it in practice. As far as I know, we have seen LLMs generally tending towards being more reliable at repeating things that are already in the data than they are at inventing novel things, and as far as I know, there’s been zero LLMs that have written operating systems “from scratch” that haven’t had multiple complete operating systems in their training data.

I’ve been training neural nets since well before the initial Transformers paper. You vomiting a couple [overfitting mitigation methods] isn’t impressive to me. We’ve known for a long time that some information is more useful when blurred, and often easier to memorize when less specific. Yes, of fucking course, we’re aiming for generalization in AI models. But I you haven’t shown anything to prove that this particular LLM isn’t just sticking together pieces of kernels it has seen. Nobody calls a collage “from scratch”.

Re: all written from scratch?

By chefren • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

Not necessarily. My fair use overrides your copyright.

You can do that for your own use as much as you want, but your fair use doesn’t include publishing it. Different countries have some exemptions for educational use etc. but as a general case, I can’t take a photo you published, make it black and white in Photoshop and publish it as mine.

Re: all written from scratch?

By q_e_t • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

My fair use overrides your copyright.

Legally, it does not. It’s a defence for use, not on overriding principle in the way your wording implies.

Re:Pretty neat, like, academically.

By drnb • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

World’s fastest aircraft that exists exclusively as a virtual model still isn’t comparable to aircraft that actually had to be built.

Yet that virtual wind tunnel and other virtual tests are today the early steps in aircraft design.

I think the original announcement frames things well:

“For Ginux, that meant one persistent OpenAI Codex task running GPT-5.6 Sol for eleven days. It produced approximately 139,000 retained lines of implementation and test code, across more than 1,000 commits. Architecture documents kept the agent aligned, and real userspaces like Rocky Linux caught bugs that synthetic tests missed.

The “human-directed” part matters. This isn’t as simple as typing “write me a kernel, don’t make mistakes” into a chatbot. It’s a person with decades of systems experience steering an agent that does the heavy lifting of coding.

…

Linux isn’t going anywhere because a prototype boots systemd in a VM. Decades of hardware enablement, code review, and community are not something an AI agent produces in eleven days.

But let’s take a step back to realize what happened here. A new kernel created from scratch, that runs an enterprise distro. And it took just 11 days with GPT 5.6 (not even 6.1, the latest model).

AI won’t replace expertise. An expert who already knows how kernels work uses AI to squeeze years of grunt work into days.

When people with deep domain knowledge pair it with frontier AI agents, projects that once needed a large team and several years start to look like weekend side projects.

Ginux won’t replace Linux, but it does show how far (and how fast) an skilled person can now go. "

Experts Expect ‘Security Reckoning’ As AI Tools Find And Exploit Software Bugs

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
The Washington Post reports:
Tens of thousands of South Koreans had their financial data exposed online in recent weeks after at least nine major banks there suffered cyberattacks that suggested a dark future for online security. One man, a 26-year-old living in southern China, was allegedly behind the attacks, according to an investigation by cybersecurity company CrowdStrike. Traces left online and failure to secure his own systems allowed investigators to piece together the man’s name, age, location and what he allegedly did. The clues revealed that the devastating assault on some of Asia’s most sophisticated financial institutions was the work of an amateur. The attacks were launched with help from a few artificial intelligence chatbots, CrowdStrike found, before asking one to help sell the stolen data online and draft a fake résumé touting cybersecurity skills…

The hacker who broke into the South Korean banks had access to Anthropic’s Claude, but because the U.S. firm’s tools generally refuse to take illegal actions, free Chinese models were also used, including DeepSeek, CrowdStrike found. “The models are interchangeable,” said Meyers, the CrowdStrike executive.
The Post calls it “part of a wave of AI-enabled hacking that is advancing across the world, triggering alarm inside national governments as well as multinational companies.”
“Basically any pedestrian, non-hacker can take these frameworks and start leveraging them to go after different targets,” said Adam Meyers, senior vice president of counter adversary operations at CrowdStrike. The company has tracked an increase in the speed with which cyberattacks can move once inside a target’s networks, as seasoned hackers and rank amateurs alike get a boost from AI tools. “Anyone can be a super-hacker now,” Meyers said… Many cyber experts still expect the security reckoning to intensify as AI tools that can find and exploit software bugs become more widely distributed and understood.

[Last] Monday, The Post reported that cybersecurity researchers from the start-up Cathedral who set out to test Anthropic’s security found that they could access internal messages and meeting transcripts. Cathedral reported its findings to Anthropic, which said it resolved the newly discovered problems… Security experts say it’s unlikely that any hacker is forgoing the use of AI tools right now.
Even in America, critical infrastructure like energy and water companies need to be “immediately and comprehensively” tested for exploitable bugs, according to Snehal Antani, chief executive of cybersecurity company Horizon3. He tells the Post the government might need to fund that remediation, and even form “a public and private partnership to accelerate incident response.”

AI is like wildfire.

By fredrated • • Score: 3 • Thread

Until we learn to control it, if ever, a lot of things are going to get burned.

Good.

By Gravis Zero • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Just because we lacked the resources to find software flaws didn’t mean that there were never massive vulnerabilities just waiting to be discovered, it just means it required dedication to find them. The lack of investment in security is about to be laid bare for all to see. Those that are actually interested in making secure software now have the opportunity to get even closer to that goal. Everyone that has been doing (and continues to do) the bare minimum is about to get a lesson in the importance of investing in real security.

Good security is expensive but having bad security is about to cost a whole lot more.

Re:It’s an interesting metric

By DamnOregonian • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
It’s problematic.
1) it’s expensive
2) the false-positive rate is very high
3) validating that it’s a false positive is difficult to test in an automated fashion.

That all being said, you’re not wrong.
Each LLM is going to be better or worse at finding different bad patterns, and incorrectly identifying certain patterns as bad that are fine.
But the fact is- if you let that LLM throw its head against the wall for long enough- if you burn enough tokens- there’s a good chance there will be a couple of diamonds in the sea of bullshit- and that’s the problem.

I have validated this myself. They’re competent in the field. Not efficient. Nowhere near as good as I am on a per-action basis. But persistence pulls through.

The missing piece Response time.

By upuv • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

We are all well aware of the dueling battle between AI bad guys vs AI Security defenders. Bad guys find new exploit/exploit chain the good guys develop mitigation to vulnerabilities.

The problem is Enterprises are simply not even remotely prepared with how fast they need to respond with applying those mitigation’s. Most enterprises are still ranking threats way to low and thus they are not being actioned.

Secondly the cyber teams are not operator’s, typically. Meaning they can do very little to address core issues in infrastructure and overall systems. They also lack the business understanding of why and how the systems are built. This leads to a lot of friction when trying to rapidly apply a mitigation.

Yes of course there a lot of DevOps and Agentic environments out there. But legacy Enterprises are still years behind, if not decades on maturity.

For these reasons we are going to see an accelerating number of compromised Enterprises. In my personal life I make sure that I insure my investments and property to offset the risks that are rising in enterprise.

Maybe we should reduce complexity

By Casandro • • Score: 3 • Thread

After all “every 1000 lines” there is a bug, and every bug can be a security issue. Now while the number of 1000 if of course heavily disputed, a software project of a billion lines of code will have more bugs than one that has just a few thousands of lines.

Currently we often layer complexity on top of complexity, since it seems free. You can get some complex library to do something you don’t actually need, since it’s just an “import” statement away, and your build system downloads it automatically… and you can even package it into a Docker image so nobody will see it. Your trivial application uses Billions of lines of code, because you use a browser as a GUI toolkit and use some framework to be able to manage it, etc.

Some surprising thing I’ve noticed when trying to use AI to write software is that you can sidestep the problem. You can just tell the AI to write minimalist code and not use any unusual libraries… and it works. The programs are as short as you’d expect from a competent programmer. It’s an interesting observation.

Maybe this could lead to less shitty software.

Binance Reopens to $3.64 in Net Outflows. ‘98% Choose to Stay’, Says Its Founder

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Binance now says it’s replenished 90% of assets stolen last week in a $6.3 billion security breach, its customers still “rushed to move funds off the platform” when it reopened Sunday, CNBC reports, and Binance “said it recorded $3.64 billion in net outflows after reopening withdrawals on Sunday.”
The exchange processed $4.65 billion in withdrawals and $1.01 billion in deposits between 6 a.m. and 3:30 p.m. UTC on Nov. 1, Binance said in a post on X. The resulting net outflows represented 2.1% of Binance’s $171 billion in total assets, based on its latest available proof-of-reserves data as of Oct. 28. Binance said withdrawal volumes had declined and were stabilizing following an initial spike, while deposit volumes remained substantial.

The exchange began restoring withdrawals in phases at 6 a.m. UTC on Sunday, with services resuming across all 15 networks and assets included in the initial phase by 12:36 p.m. UTC. It said testing was continuing for the remaining networks and assets.

Binance founder and former CEO Changpeng Zhao sought to reassure users following the breach, writing on X that “98% choose to stay!” He said most of the net outflows occurred within the first couple of hours after withdrawals resumed.

“Nothing to See Here. All is well!”, says Founder

By MIPSPro • • Score: 3 • Thread
There is no end to the attacks both AI and QC are going to bring to crypto. No doubt they’ll cover what they can, but it’s just a matter of time. Imagine the next few attacks. Convert your crypto to something else… soon before your peers realize the game is up.

Re:“Nothing to See Here. All is well!”, says Found

By drnb • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

There is no end to the attacks both AI and QC are going to bring to crypto. No doubt they’ll cover what they can, but it’s just a matter of time. Imagine the next few attacks. Convert your crypto to something else… soon before your peers realize the game is up.

It’s not about crypto itself, it’s about who is holding your wallet and its keys, you or a third party.

Just ‘first shareholder’.

By fuzzyfuzzyfungus • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread
For a guy who is legally barred from involvement in the company under the terms of a prior money laundering conviction our man CZ sure tweets like more than the mere humble shareholder he insists he is.

Re:“Nothing to See Here. All is well!”, says Found

By Zocalo • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread
Sure, but if - as is likely given how AI is finding exploits elsewhere - this kind of heist becomes more commonplace what do you think is going to happen to the notional value of all those secure crypto wallets? Even if you take Binance at face value, then while they’ve either recovered, or are in the process of recovering, a significant chunk of the stolen tokens, they have still had to dip pretty deeply into cash reserves to cover the rest.

Where is the money going to come from if Binance are done again before they get to rebuild that cushion, or keep getting hit with lots of somewhat smaller heists in a death by a thousand cuts type scenario? What do you think is going to happen to market confidence, and therefore token values, if another of the major exchanges defaults/rug pulls as a result of one of these heists, which is probably just a matter of time now? The reality is that there’s a whole bunch of people using crypto who are either too lazy and/or not technically adept enough to sort out their own wallet and keys, so they’re going to keep using exchanges like they are banks. That makes the whole system vulnerable to token value crashes because it doesn’t matter where and how securely your crypto is stored if the value of the tokens tank; everyone with a HODL position gets to be a bagholder in that scenario.

$3.64?

By ZiggyZiggyZig • • Score: 3 • Thread

in related news, Binance executives now unable to buy a coffee at Starbucks.

Stack Overflow: ‘Reports of Our Death are Greatly Exaggerated’

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot
Stack Overflow’s senior VP of community says predictions of their demise “make for compelling headlines, but they confuse a change in how people access knowledge with the disappearance of the knowledge — and the company — behind it.
AI has changed developer behavior. In our recently released 2026 Developer Survey, 64% of respondents said they visit Stack Overflow less frequently for simple questions. But developers also report asking more advanced questions and visiting the site to verify AI-generated answers. Stack Overflow remains a place where people can challenge assumptions, compare approaches, and validate solutions.

But it’s also important to understand that our public Q&A site is only one part of Stack Overflow, the company. The knowledge created on the Q&A site helps power the AI ecosystem itself. Stack Overflow’s human-validated content is used to train and improve models, strengthen retrieval systems, and make AI assistants and other tools more reliable. Developers and technologists may encounter an answer through a different interface — such as their IDE — but the underlying knowledge may still have begun the same way it did in the past: with a developer sharing what they learned on Stack Overflow.

We’re also building for what comes next. We recently launched the beta of Stack Overflow for Agents, an API-first knowledge exchange where agents can share knowledge and verify solutions. We also brought back Developer Story, giving developers a verifiable way to showcase their expertise, accomplishments, and contributions beyond a traditional résumé. And we have much more planned and in development to give people compelling new reasons to visit the site beyond Q&A.

Several years ago, we pivoted aggressively toward the enterprise. In September, we launched the next generation of Stack Internal, our governed AI context layer for companies. It captures and curates organizational knowledge, adds provenance and trust signals, and brings in subject-matter experts when validation is needed. The goal is straightforward: to make sure employees and AI agents are working from accurate, current, permission-aware information — not confidently acting on whatever context happens to be nearby.

That is the thread connecting everything we do: making human knowledge useful and trustworthy, whether it is being consumed by another developer, an enterprise team, or an AI agent. Stack Overflow is not standing still, and it is not disappearing. We are evolving from a website people visit for answers into knowledge infrastructure that supports developers, companies, and AI systems wherever they work. Reports of our death are, indeed, exaggerated.

I hope you fail horribly

By Echoez • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

I think I’ve asked 10 questions in my life on StackOverflow. For about 7 of them, I was met with outright hostility or condescension or just completely inaccurate claims that my question was a duplicate. The other 3? Met with complete silence and have gone unanswered to this day.

I hope your site fails and that every moderator is sent to the spice mines of Kessel

I think I see what’s happening…

By outsider007 • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

64% of respondents said they visit Stack Overflow less frequently for simple questions.

You’re polling the 13 guys left who still answer Stack Overflow polls. Say hi to Gweihir if you see him.

Re: I hope you fail horribly

By shm • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

Next up, Reddit and they are working hard to go the same way.

Re:The manual?

By pipegeek • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread

I can’t speak for others, but I’ve often found I learn much faster by engaging with someone who’s working on a project, than by sitting down and working through a tool’s manual from cover to cover. Much like a course with lectures where I can ask questions and where the professor is attempting to present information calibrated to connect with her audience is a *much* better way to learn a subject than to just sit down alone with a textbook.

Developing a complete mastery of each tool *before* attempting to do anything with it is frequently not a viable approach, and mastery is often what is required in order to answer a question from the knowledge in a manual, as the answer may emerge from multiple small details spread across multiple chapters.

Meanwhile, there’s probably someone out there who’s working on the same exact problem you are, has stumbled in the same places, and now has an answer. And reading what they went through to *find* their answer can provide the clues to develop a better understanding of the tool, such that it’s easier to find what you’re looking for in the manual next time.

Manuals are good! But we’re also not meant to exist and work in a vacuum. We’re humans! We do better when we are in communication with each other.

Re:Bypass the Pompousness

By AmiMoJo • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread

It’s the same with Linux. One of the reasons why it’s finally gaining traction on the desktop is because instead of searching outdated Reddit threads and being berated by neckbeards who think you are an idiot for not doing it the way they do, you just ask AI and get a helpful response.