Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Scifi Magazine ‘Starlog’ Relaunches, and Back Issues Return to Internet Archive
  2. AlpineBSD Announced - an AI-free FOSS OS
  3. Microsoft Removes PC-to-PC Migration from Windows 11, Points Users to OneDrive-Based Backup
  4. Data Centers are Being Powered By Giant Gas Plants, Possibly Increasing Carbon Pollution for Decades
  5. Is Mandating AI Use in the Workplace Backfiring?
  6. Scientists Find Rare Meteorite From Mars With Signs of Ancient Water
  7. A Third Major US Offshore Wind Farm Is Now Fully Operational
  8. AlmaLinux Shows Advantages of ABI Compatibility After RHEL Restricted Source Code Access
  9. China’s Top Spy Agency Recruited Woman Who Targeted Jensen Huang
  10. Cryosphere Faces Permanent Damage When World Overshoots 1.5C, Scientists Warn
  11. Vibrating Mattress Helps Clear Alzheimer’s Protein From the Brain
  12. Mexico’s Senate Approves ISP Rules To Disconnect Persistent Online Pirates
  13. EU Says TikTok’s ‘Rabbit Hole’ Effect Must Stop
  14. Chainalysis Says Breach Exposed Credentials For All Customers
  15. Activists Breach Microsoft Data Center Construction Site As Protests Spread In Europe

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Scifi Magazine ‘Starlog’ Relaunches, and Back Issues Return to Internet Archive

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Slashdot reader sandbagger brings news about the classic science ficdtion magazine Starlog. It’s 33-year run from 1976 to 2009 is now available on the Internet Archive.

And 17 years after publishing its final issue, Starlog is relaunching, publishing one issue a year starting November 13, according to The Hollywood Reporter:
The magazine launched in 1976 and gained a fanbase for being one of the few places to get reliable news and interviews about geek culture. It launched with a cover focusing on Star Trek, one of its key areas of expertise, but the magazine’s editors and writers also pioneered coverage of Star Wars. (The new issue chronicles some of the rumors it put out a year before the movie opened). In all, Starlog published 374 issues and more than 25,000 pages… In addition to the film and TV-focused features Starlog was known for, the new Starlog will also delve into futurism, as the cover from Gabriel Yeganyan highlights. The opening story of issue No. 1 looks at the viability of humans farming crops on planets outside of Earth, for example… The revival was announced earlier this year, and includes a podcast hosted by Jordan Hoffman, a veteran journalist who has contributed to The Hollywood Reporter.

AlpineBSD Announced - an AI-free FOSS OS

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Lproven (Slashdot reader #6,030) shares his article about a new OS in the BSD family “combining NetBSD’s kernel and libc with a port of the Alpine Linux userland” — and promising it won’t use AI-generated code:
AlpineBSD is so new that it barely exists yet. There are no installation media available, though it’s possible to manually bootstrap an installation. What AlpineBSD does already have is an AI policy, and the plan is to avoid “the output of generative AI models (e.g. LLMs)" as far as possible:

“Any software whose code, documentation, binaries, or other assets include, in any part, the output of a generative AI tool such as an LLM, is considered ‘tainted’ for our purposes....”

Back in 2024, the NetBSD project made its position on AI plain. Its commit guidelines say that “code generated by a Large Language Model […] is presumed to be tainted code....”

AlpineBSD’s ports repository and source code are hosted on Sourcehut, under the account of sircmpwn, better known as Drew DeVault… We will follow AlpineBSD with interest. There’s strong appeal in the plan of combining perhaps the best-known, longest-established AI-free Unix-like kernel with the user-facing parts of pretty much the smallest and cleanest Linux distro there is. The AI advocates often warn LLM skeptics that they risk being left behind. Well, here’s an OS for those who don’t want to surf the AI wave.
The article does acknowledge difficulty installing software using the pkgin package manager (an optional extra), explaining that since 1993 the NetBSD community has had “its own ideas about what is normal… Some folks on the mailing list told us that they never use binary packages anyway — they compile what they need from source code.”

Reminds me of SQLite’s stance

By Sebby • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread

This stance reminds me a bit of SQLite’s stance on contributions:

SQLite is open-source but it is not open-contribution. All the code in SQLite is written by a small team of experts. The project does not accept “pull requests” or patches from anonymous passers-by on the internet

The main reason in their case is that they want to maintain the code as pure public domain, so don’t want it “tainted” by contributions of unknown origin that might later cause issues if used.

Microsoft Removes PC-to-PC Migration from Windows 11, Points Users to OneDrive-Based Backup

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Windows 11 offered a PC-to-PC Migration feature that “moved files and settings directly between two PCs over Wi-Fi or Ethernet,” reports Ghacks. But according to an updated Microsoft support page, the tool is no longer available.

“Microsoft’s support documentation now redirects users to Windows Backup, a tool that relies on OneDrive cloud storage instead of a direct connection between two computers…”
Windows Backup works differently. It requires a personal Microsoft account and backs up supported folders (Desktop, Documents, Pictures, Videos and Music) to OneDrive. Free OneDrive accounts include only 5GB of storage, and Microsoft’s own promotional screenshot for Windows Backup shows 4.5GB of that allowance already in use. Years of photos, documents and downloads can exceed the free tier quickly.

Windows Backup does carry some extras. It can remember installed apps, Wi-Fi networks, passwords and some settings to speed up setup on a new device. Apps still have to be reinstalled, and supported files are restored from the cloud.
Thanks to Slashdot reader joshuark for sharing the article.

Time to squeeze platform users trapped again

By atrimtab • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Ah, more “permanent rent seeking” by a tech company!

Just like the Frontier AI play… Pay us forever while we listen in and steal your IP.

No Thanks!

Microsoft, why should anyone use and pay forever your invariably slower online backup service until their systems die versus what they can do locally?

LMAO

By Archfeld • • Score: 3 • Thread

I barely got my machine weaned from OneDrive. I’ll just backup myself and FSCK M$…again.

Other software

By rossdee • • Score: 3 • Thread

I am sure that other companies offer migration tools in the Shareware and commercial software space.

You can never

By Vinegar Joe • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

hate Microsoft enough.

Data Centers are Being Powered By Giant Gas Plants, Possibly Increasing Carbon Pollution for Decades

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Rather than racing toward their net-zero targets, Amazon and other AI/cloud computing companies “are driving emissions sharply higher,” reports the Washington Post:
To support their data centers, tech firms are driving construction of a new generation of supersized, gas-fired power plants that could lock in hundreds of millions of tons of climate pollution for decades to come, according to corporate disclosures and an analysis conducted for The Post by a researcher at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. Industry estimates show these projects have put the tech sector on course to grow from a modest driver of industrial carbon pollution into one of the world’s biggest emitters of greenhouse gases. Some anticipate that its share of global carbon emissions will increase as much as fivefold from 2020 to 2030. That would leave the tech industry churning out more than half the climate pollution created by global aviation or shipping — sectors long associated with driving warming…

Already, Amazon’s carbon footprint reached 80.85 million metric tons last year — 58% larger than when [Amazon CEO Jeff] Bezos pledged to shrink it. The company has veered far from the path laid out in the Paris agreement, which would have emissions falling steeply by now and dropping to 43% below 2019 levels by 2030. The tech companies say in corporate disclosures and public statements that they remain committed to their net zero targets, and they suggest the emissions surge is temporary — to be mitigated down the road, when new energy technologies enable the data centers to run cleaner and more efficiently. They also stress that they continue to invest in clean energy and rank as some of the world’s biggest consumers of it. With some complicated accounting maneuvers and carbon credit purchases, their solar, wind and geothermal installations partly cancel out their gas emissions, according to corporate disclosures.
A June report from international insurance/asset management Allianz found the world’s data center emissions are on track to double to 643 million tons of CO2 annually between 2020 and 2030, the article points out. And they cite American data centers contributing to the problem:

Re:We decided we don’t want nuclear

By haruchai • • Score: 4, Funny • Thread

and be like the FRENCH?

They need regulation

By Jeremi • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread

If ever there was an industry crying out for regulation, it’s the AI industry. I say that not because I’m against them, but because they would actually do better in the long run if they were regulated, instead of goading other into this insane game of chicken where everybody loses when the bubble bursts.

The Climate Pledges were a Lie

By BitterEpic • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Here is the Microsoft 2026 Environmental Sustainability Report. The environmental reports for other companies like Amazon, Facebook and Apple likely look similar. In this day and age, it has become clear that these reports and pledges are just ploys to get people to turn the other way. Another popular ploy is to use a recycling program to avoid adding repair-ability to a device.

Big tech since the iPhone and AWS has been going on a progressively anti-human. The money of Wallstreet and the business heads have taken over an industry that used to be filled with people wanting to do something fun and make something useful.

The stupid amount of money that investors are putting into AI is causing idiots to run at the money at the expense of the world like a Mr Beast YouTube video. What would you do for a million dollars? During this time, Europe is leading the US in ethics and tech. They have appropriate laws. The US does not. It just has a bunch of Sutter Cane style zombies running at the money while forgetting their humanity.

Giant Gas Plants

By 93 Escort Wagon • • Score: 3 • Thread

In my head, for a few seconds I (seriously) somehow read that headline as

“Data Centers are Being Powered by Gas Giant Planets”

… and I was really curious regarding what the heck they could possibly be talking about.

Is Mandating AI Use in the Workplace Backfiring?

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Some workplaces are holding mandatory AI training sessions, while others “are requiring employees to use a specific number of tokens,” reports the Washington Post, “or log a certain amount of time on AI platforms.”

The article’s headline? “Why mandating AI use in the workplace can backfire.”
[A] lot of employers are going about it the wrong way, said Arvind Karunakaran, an assistant professor of management science and engineering at Stanford University. “You can consume a lot of tokens without creating a lot of value,” Karunakaran said....

The adoption of AI is happening faster than the adoption of the internet did, according to a new report from Stanford’s Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence. And many users report that AI tools have really helped — whether saving time and costs or increasing innovation. The same report, though, found that one-third of organizations surveyed expected AI-related staff reductions in the coming year. Especially in that context, simply mandating usage won’t spark excitement about the technology, Karunakaran said, and neither will insisting that employees use AI to cut turnaround times and ramp up productivity. “People start asking questions like ‘What am I as an employee getting out of it?’" he said.

The report he co-authored found that in the short-term, mandating AI tools may ramp up productivity. But in the long-to-medium term, employees tend to feel devalued and disengaged. From there, people find ways to mindlessly check the box.

When employers present these tools and their use as an opportunity for employees to expand their skills and grow their careers, people are much likelier to use them, Karunakaran said. He suggests that rather than requiring employees use a specific number of tokens, companies should encourage workers to experiment and share their own use cases and success stories. Most workplaces are still shutting employees out of the conversation. More than half of employees said they have less of a say than they’d want on adopting new tech at work, according to a report from Gallup and Jobs for the Future, a work and education nonprofit.
Any Slashdot readers want to share your own stories on how AI was introduced at your workplace?

“present as an opportunity”

By ffkom • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

When employers present these tools and their use as an opportunity for employees to expand their skills and grow their careers…

… those employers would just be lying, and many employees would see through this.

There is little “skill” in asking some AI agent to do something, and even if some employee meticulously formulates his prompts to optimize the effective use of the AI, this will go unnoticed by his supervisors, while at the same time a lot of general thinking skills shrink among the entirety of the population due to the outsourcing of thinking to AIs. The only growth their careers will see is a growth in free time due to unemployment or a growth in unpleasant physical work at minimum wage for those filling that gap until the robots get good enough also in physical work.

A waste of time

By uncoveror • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread
I work in IT Support at a federal agency. They have crammed IT into our ticketing system which is a tweaked version of ServiceNow. Its search tool drifts off topic faster than a conventional search engine, and if we let it write the conclusion section of our tickets, we have to do them over because they do not reflect the work that was done in order at all. AI complicates simple tasks and wastes time. That is the opposite of what computers are for.

Re:Working as intended

By ffkom • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

Humans invented machines to do their work so they would have more free time.

Yes, and that is a good thing as long as humans own the machines that do their work. This time, however, humans do not own the machines that do their work, and their unemployment is a problem, because the machine owners have no reason to keep the no longer needed humans around (or even alive).

Jetsons

By sevenfactorial • • Score: 3 • Thread

George Jetson worked at a computer panel a couple of days a week for a few hours. In the center of the panel was a large red button. Mostly George slept on the job, but occasionally something happened that required him to push the button. I am not sure if at the time this job was supposed to be a fantasy or a nightmare. Now that it is a reality, I see it very clearly as more on the nightmare side.

Using AI is very depressing and also very unavoidable.

Just the Hawthorne Effect?

By SoftwareArtist • • Score: 3 • Thread

The report he co-authored found that in the short-term, mandating AI tools may ramp up productivity.

The Hawthorne Effect is based on a series of experiments in the 1920s and 30s. They tried varying lots of aspects of a work environment to see how it affected productivity, like lighting levels, break schedules, and whether workers were given snacks. They found that just about any change led to an increase in productivity, but only for a short time. Then it went back to where it started. The particular change didn’t really matter, only that you changed something, and that people knew they were being studied.

This report is likely something similar. If you make people work differently, for a short time they become more engaged. They may also be focused on proving to their manager they can use the new technology. But it doesn’t last. Productivity drops again. It’s a mistake to assume the effect had anything to do with the particular change you made.

Scientists Find Rare Meteorite From Mars With Signs of Ancient Water

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
“I didn’t think a rock like this existed on Earth,” a geologist at the Lunar and Planetary Institute in Texas told the Washington Post. It looks like a polished rock, dark brown with a clay-colored stripe — but it’s actually one of the oldest Mars meteorites ever found, blasted by an impact from the surface of Mars billions of years ago:
Technically speaking it’s a collection of eight rock fragments, the largest of which is about the size of a fist. Nearly two pounds of the meteorite was discovered in the Sahara in Mali in 2022, and most is now held by a museum in Maine. Within two years, an initial examination determined the meteorite hailed from Mars; scientists are now finally digging deeper, with stunning results.
It offers records of “interactions of water and rock and maybe even an imprint of the Martian atmosphere as it was losing water,” says Lee Saper, co-author of a new paper recently published in Science. “It was only after we started looking closely that we realized this meteorite is really unique,” said Yang Liu of NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Southern California, the lead author of a new paper published in Science. “One of the paper’s reviewers called it a Rosetta Stone for Mars.”

Its mix of minerals “tells a story about how the planet’s crust formed from cooling magma before it was eventually altered by subsurface water,” NASA’s JPL says in an announcement. The Washington Post reports:
The story begins 4.1 billion years ago, when crystals of a mineral called zircon probably solidified out of molten magma on Mars. “That was a game changer,” [said Yang Liu, a planetary scientist at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in California], since scientists can date zircon very precisely, and it has been rare in other Mars meteorites. The date immediately put the Teghaza meteorite on special footing, alongside only two other Mars rocks known to have formed by 4 billion years ago…

Perhaps most intriguingly, the researchers also saw signs that the rock had been exposed to water during its evolution, a find detailed in work published this summer in Science Advances.

A Third Major US Offshore Wind Farm Is Now Fully Operational

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Despite the Trump administration’s efforts to halt development on a $6.2 billion wind farm, it’s now “completely up and running,” reports the nonprofit energy news site Canary Media, delivering enough electricity to power the equivalent over 350,000 homes:
On Thursday, the Danish energy giant Ørsted said its 704-megawatt wind farm near Connecticut and Rhode Island began “generating up to its full capacity” in October. Revolution Wind began producing smaller amounts of power in the spring, and the company installed the last of 65 turbines in September. The project is the third U.S. utility-scale offshore wind farm to reach full commercial operations, after South Fork Wind near New York and Vineyard Wind near Massachusetts.
Before the start of Trump’s second term, BloombergNEF projected America would build 39 gigawatts of offshore wind by 2035 the article points out, but “Now, it expects just 5.9 GW to come online — an amount that reflects the handful of projects that were already completed or under construction at the start of last year.”
Despite the diminished pipeline, the carbon-free energy source is still expected to help keep household utility bills in check across the U.S. Northeast, experts say. Revolution Wind and the country’s other completed projects have already played a key role in reducing grid stress during extreme weather events this year…

Ørsted hit its power milestone despite being forced to halt construction twice last year. In August 2025, the Interior Department issued a stop-work order for Revolution Wind, due to unspecified national security threats. That order was tossed out by a federal judge one month later. But in late December, the administration issued new stop-work orders to all five offshore wind projects then under construction. Judges struck those orders down one by one — but not before developers had lost huge sums of money and nearly missed key project deadlines…

Meanwhile, Ørsted said it’s making progress on another offshore wind development, Sunrise Wind. The developer on Thursday said it has finished installing all of the wind-turbine foundations for the 924-MW project off the coast of Long Island, New York. That installation is expected to be fully operational in the second half of next year.

Now witness the power

By jfdavis668 • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread
of this fully armed and operational wind farm!

Re:Not just Trump

By olsmeister • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread
Nice to see all of them getting overruled by common sense.

Funny timing on that one

By gweihir • • Score: 4, Funny • Thread

A pity they cannot use the current US admin’s production of hot air to supercharge these wind farms. Might produce even more energy that way.

Re:This would be terrible news

By gweihir • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

Actually offshore wind is not a problem for birds. This has been studied carefully: Most birds avoid the rotor radius fully, the rest does not get hit. A research project running over two years did not find a single hit on a bird: https://group.vattenfall.com/p…

This is different for onshore wind and buildings (!).

Obviously that offshore wind is dangerous to birds is an often repeadet lie by those that see clean energy as a threat…

Re:COOL!!!

By SoftwareArtist • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Basically, we’d need to build a landmass the size of the US, and cover it in Chinese solar panels and wind turbines

You’re off by a few orders of magnitude. To supply 100% of the world’s electricity, you would need to cover 0.3% of its land area with solar panels. Considering that urban areas cover 2% of the US, it could probably cover most of its electricity just with solar panels on existing roofs and parking lots.

Of course, the story you’re responding to is about offshore wind, which takes up no land at all. And onshore wind can easily share land with other uses like agriculture. Finding enough land for renewable energy is really not a problem.

AlmaLinux Shows Advantages of ABI Compatibility After RHEL Restricted Source Code Access

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
“AlmaLinux OS charted a new path in 2023 when Red Hat restricted source code access to Red Hat Enterprise Linux,” remembers Linux Magazine. “Rather than pursue 1:1 compatibility with RHEL like other Enterprise Linux alternatives, the AlmaLinux OS Foundation chose application binary interface (ABI) compatibility, which guarantees that applications and kernel modules that work on RHEL will work on AlmaLinux OS.”
No longer constrained by the 1:1 promise, AlmaLinux can offer new features, or add back deprecated ones, while still remaining a stable, drop-in replacement for RHEL… The release of AlmaLinux OS 10.2 in May 2026 reveals just how far AlmaLinux has come....

When RHEL 10 increased the x86-64-v2 architecture baseline to x86-64-v3, many older server platforms (and some new ones) were left in the lurch. These older servers couldn’t support the modern CPU feature sets in x86-64-v3, including AVX2 CPU instructions. AlmaLinux recognized that many community members employed older hardware that relied on x86-64-v2. While x86-64-v3 is enabled by default in AlmaLinux OS 10 and AlmaLinux OS Kitten 10, an additional x86-64-v2 build is also available. The x86-64-v2 build works best for environments that rely on standard OS packages or that can rebuild any additional packages required by x86-64-v2. For users with older hardware, the additional x86-64-v2 build allows continued use of current hardware, saving money and keeping servers from the landfill. AlmaLinux OS 10 is actively supported through 2030 with security support through 2035, significantly extending the life of older hardware....

Many legacy applications and containerized workloads still run on i686, a 32-bit computer processor architecture belonging to the Intel x86 family, including software that only ships as i686, CI pipelines that require a specific 32-bit glibc, and seemingly normal looking containers that require a 32-bit environment. RHEL 10 completely removed 32-bit application support and multilib libraries after deprecating support in earlier releases… AlmaLinux OS 10.2 has added package repos and official container images for 32-bit x86 (but not a 32-bit kernel or installer)…

NVIDIA GPUs, ubiquitous in modern computing, have been a pain point for Linux users. Getting the closed-source NVIDIA drivers has required extra steps and manual installation. When NVIDIA released an open source version of their graphics driver, AlmaLinux integrated the drivers, along with the associated CUDA components, into the AlmaLinux repository starting with AlmaLinux OS 9 and 10. AlmaLinux also signs the open source drivers, allowing secure boot with the NVIDIA drivers they ship. Unlike RHEL users, AlmaLinux users now have native support, allowing them to skip manual installation. AlmaLinux users can now enjoy a fully integrated NVIDIA experience.
In addition, “Thanks to ABI compatibility, AlmaLinux can sometimes deliver patches more quickly than RHEL,” the article points out. And it lists other points where AlmaLinux OS 10.2 diverges from RHEL 10:

Check it out

By markdavis • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

I am glad I moved my servers to AlmaLinux. It has been working out really well over the last few years. They were also fast to offer mitigation information and updated packages for each of the high-profile vulnerabilities this year.

If you are worried about what level your processor supports just run this:

  $ /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 —help | grep -A4 ‘glibc-hwcaps directories’

Look for the word “supported” on each level. Mine shows this on my large Xeon 6254 (Alma) servers:

    x86-64-v4 (supported, searched)
    x86-64-v3 (supported, searched)
    x86-64-v2 (supported, searched)

At home on my AMD Ryzen 7 3700X desktop (Mint) I get:

    x86-64-v4
    x86-64-v3 (supported, searched)
    x86-64-v2 (supported, searched)

So I have v3 support, but not v4. Hopefully that will be good enough for a long time coming…

Re:Wait a second…

By thecombatwombat • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

It is, but basically only in the barest most minimally technically legal sense.

Only paying customers have access, and of course they can choose who gets to be a paying customer. Once you get access though, it still is open source, you can still publish derivative works and all. This is technically still GPL compliant and has at least held up for three years now.

In real short, the goal was to cut off Oracle, but they went pretty scorched-earth about it.

Re:Check it out

By 93 Escort Wagon • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

We switched our servers and workstations to AlmaLinux after IBM pulled the rug out from under us with 8. I’ve been very happy with both the product itself and with the people behind it.

Re:Wait a second…

By caseih • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

This was discussed extensively over the last few years.

Disclaimer: lengthy mansplaning post follows for the one or two slashdotters interested but who haven’t followed this long-running controversy.

Until a few years ago, RH had a public git repository of their rpm spec files, and probably also their patch sets (can’t quite remember). Fairly abruptly they shut down that public repository saying that the repo and folks using it to build RHEL clones didn’t provide anything of value to the community (really passive aggressive). This caught a lot of people by surprise and it really was a poke in the eye of the community.

But going back even further, Red Hat’s support contracts have always caused heartburn for free software supporters, particularly with regards to the GPL. A RH support contract grants access to SRPM files for the entire distro to their customers, along with of course the actual RPMS. But the wording of the support contract says you cannot use those files on non-supported installations. Meaning they don’t want you to pay for one server and then use the downloaded files to update your whole cluster, even though the source code license, particularly in the case of the GPL, explicitly grants such permission. Many free software advocates have complained that although RH abides by the GPL technically, they are using contract law to end run around it.

So far as I know, no actual customers of RH have ever been threatened with contract cancellations over this, and to this day Rocky Linux and Oracle both use these RH-downloaded SRPMs to build their distros. I’m not sure to what extend RH actively pursues the accounts used to download by Rocky and Oracle.

RH’s defense is that the upstream CentOS Stream system is public and free to use by the community to build on. This is what Alma Linux does and it works very well while maintaining compatibility with RHEL. The only downside is it’s harder convert an existing install between RHEL and AlmaLinux. Back in the old CentOS days it was easy. I’d bring up a server on CentOS, test it in beta for a few months/year, then before bringing it into production I’d finally roll it over into a supported RHEL instance.

Re:RH said clones offered “nothing of value”

By 93 Escort Wagon • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

Since 2023 I’ve seen AlmaLinux release patches, well ahead of RHEL itself, when several news-making exploits reared their ugly heads. They’re inarguably offering significant added value to the community.

China’s Top Spy Agency Recruited Woman Who Targeted Jensen Huang

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from The New York Times:
A Chinese businesswoman who had a close relationship with the chief executive of one of the most important artificial intelligence companies in the United States was a spy for China’s Ministry of State Security, Beijing’s top intelligence agency, according to people briefed on U.S. surveillance. The businesswoman, Alice Huang, was recruited by the ministry to collect intelligence on Jensen Huang, the chief executive of Nvidia, as part of a drive to learn more about American A.I. chips and potentially influence the company to push for its most advanced chips to be made available to China, the people said.

[…] The New York Times reported last week that Mr. Huang was a target of a Chinese intelligence operation, and that U.S. intelligence agencies were conducting electronic surveillance of Ms. Huang, a Chinese citizen, for at least a year. The Times reported that Mr. Trump had been briefed last year about Mr. Huang’s relationship with her, but chose not to do anything about it. Ms. Huang speaks English well and has relationships with executives at the highest levels of the A.I. chip industry, including Mr. Huang and the leaders of Gigabyte, one of the top assemblers of Nvidia supercomputers, said people who have met her. She has attended industry conferences and private executive dinners. It is unclear when Ms. Huang first met Nvidia’s leader. In 2024, around the time the two of them were photographed together at a bar in Taipei, her company, Megaspeed, began a multibillion-dollar purchase of advanced A.I. microchips.

To many in the industry, the well-funded push by Megaspeed into A.I. appeared to come out of nowhere. Ms. Huang was connected to a network of companies and investors clustered around Shanghai and Zhejiang province that had used their ties to local officials in Shanghai to push aggressively from mobile video games into data centers, which provide the computing power behind artificial intelligence. Megaspeed has been building data centers in Southeast Asia and then renting their computing power to Alibaba, the giant Chinese internet firm, giving China a backdoor way of getting access to advanced Nvidia chips. Nvidia is restricted by the United States from selling those chips directly to China. Beyond its local connections, the network also has a financial link to the Chinese military establishment, through an investment in a cybersecurity subsidiary of China Electronics Technology Group, one of the country’s largest makers of military technology.
Following the report, top Republican lawmakers have asked Jensen Huang to appear before Congress to answer questions. “Recent reports raise significant national security concerns regarding the People’s Republic of China’s access to sensitive US technology and information,” representatives John Moolenaar, Brian Mast, and Rick Crawford said. “The issue of PRC infiltration and access to cutting-edge US technology is core to the investigative work of our three committees this Congress. It is vital that Congress determines the extent to which US national security has been placed at risk,” the lawmakers added.

Businesswoman is doing a lot of work there

By frenchgates • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread
“Businesswoman Pussy Galore was said to have been recruited by master criminal Ernst Stavro Blofeld.”

Sounds like nothing special

By gweihir • • Score: 3 • Thread

Spies will spy. Is this just more “China baaaaad” drivel?

Re:Not quite “nothing”

By dfghjk • • Score: 4, Informative • Thread

Why would Trump care? Unless he could get something out of it, and perhaps he did.

Cryosphere Faces Permanent Damage When World Overshoots 1.5C, Scientists Warn

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
A UN-backed report warns that even temporarily overshooting the Paris agreement’s 1.5C warming target could cause permanent and widespread losses of glaciers, snow and polar ice sheets. With Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets already melting about six times faster than in the 1990s, the report argues that global temperatures should ultimately be brought back below 1C. The Guardian reports:
The report, which comes as world leaders and diplomats converge on Turkey for the 31st annual Cop climate conference, documented rapid and accelerating melting of the cryosphere and polar oceans, with damages that range from the loss of the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets, driving sea level rises that threaten hundreds of millions of people, to thawing permafrost, which releases more planet-heating gas. Glaciers, which are still responding to historical warming, would only preserve about 70% of their current volume over a timescale of centuries if long-term heating were brought back down to 0.8C, the report found.

Meanwhile, the ice sheets covering Greenland and Antarctica, which are melting about six times faster today than in the 1990s, would continue to lose ice even in scenarios where overshoot is brief and temperature rise returns to 1.5C, the report found. The scientists said a safe, long-term temperature limit for polar ice sheets lies much closer to 1.0C of global heating, and possibly even lower. “Snow and ice respond rapidly to every fraction of a degree of warming,” said [James Kirkham, a glaciologist at ICCI and the lead author of the report. “But most of these systems will take centuries or millennia to recover after overshoot, especially if tipping points are crossed that cause changes to become essentially irreversible.”

Last month, a UNEP report found the world must cut emissions by 18% by 2030 and by 45% by 2035 to have a good chance of keeping temperatures from rising 1.7C above preindustrial levels. It found there were “no good outcomes” of remaining above 1.5C. The cryosphere report found that current policies, which will result in 2.8C of global heating, would reduce the mass of glacier ice to below 10% in the Rockies, Alps, Iceland and Scandinavia. If warming was limited to 1.5C, about 20-35% of the mass would remain. In the Hindu Kush Himalayas, where glaciers are a source of water for nearly a quarter of humanity, current policies will leave just 41% of the ice mass. If warming was limited to 1.5C, 83% would remain.

Re:Cryosphere

By demon driver • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

https://wmo.int/themes/cryosph…

Re:Cryosphere

By dfghjk • • Score: 4, Informative • Thread

ICE doesn’t care whether you “come” illegally, they don’t even care if you’re a native born citizen. And the only way for there to be “no more ICE” is to eliminate “people” like you. Of course, we know this is likely a paid account or bot. Sad that /. cares so little that posts like this continue.

Re:Cryosphere

By stabiesoft • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
Correct. This is why the R’s got slaughtered in TX. I saw some interviews with biz people in the Rio grande. Basically the interview said the hispanic community was fine with deporting criminal illegal immigrants, and they voted for trump in 2024. But what they did not realize was trump did exactly what he said he was going to do. Round them all up (and by all he meant brown skin) and deport them. So the one biz guy was saying he had a legal immigrant mixing up a batch of concrete and ICE swoops in grabs him and throws him in detention for a few days. Finally the guy got out, but did not come back to the employer. I mean why would you? So in 2026, the Rio grande communities voted blue. And they may do the same in 2028. Ted Cruz of all people who has licked donnie’s ass for years is starting to push back. Maybe he realizes he will be toast next time. I’d tell him too little too late Teddy.

Re:Cryosphere

By jacks smirking reven • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread

Thank goodness the conservatives and Trump himself seem incapable of changing that strategy. Stephen Miller is Chief of Staff and when you read most of their media commentators they are onboard with the idea that the path forward is to get more racist and they’ll listen to fake tough guy larpers like Matt Walsh before they consider any amount of self reflection, I mean none of them can even do a post-analysis without involving ChatGPT.

The party of giving up on thinking.

Nothing is permanent

By daninaustin • • Score: 3 • Thread
The world is constantly changing. Nothing is permanent.

Vibrating Mattress Helps Clear Alzheimer’s Protein From the Brain

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
A vibrating mattress combined with two pills that release nitric oxide enhanced the brain’s ability to clear an Alzheimer’s-related protein. According to New Scientist, the experiment “caused the brain’s blood vessels to swell and constrict more strongly, which enhanced the glymphatic system’s clearance of [the protein].” From the report:
[Kesa Kiviniemi at the University of Oulu in Finland] and his colleagues recruited 29 adults who hadn’t been diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease or any other cognitive issues. The participants took a pill that dissolves when under the tongue, releasing nitric oxide. They then lay on a mattress that caused their bodies to gently vibrate for 40 minutes, taking another pill halfway through. Blood samples revealed that their levels of a type of protein called beta-amyloid 42 increased by 35 per cent, on average, after the intervention. This protein, which usually helps neurons signal and connect to each other, misfolds and form clumps in Alzheimer’s disease.

“The treatment seemed to enhance the glymphatic system’s ability to clear beta-amyloid from the brain to the blood,” says Kiviniemi. “A 35 per cent increase in circulating beta-amyloid 42 is a substantial and very interesting acute effect,” says Tuomas Lilius at the University of Helsinki, who wasn’t involved in the work. “It is certainly possible it could become biologically, and eventually clinically, relevant.” Side effects were mild and minimal, with six of the participants experiencing issues such as nausea and headache. However, this could partly be due to the expectation of an effect from the nitric oxide pills. The researchers hope to overcome this in future work by including placebo pills.

Brain scans suggest the treatment enhanced the flow of fluid along glymphatic channels, probably by widening the brain’s blood vessels and making them pump more strongly, says Kiviniemi. But other mechanisms could also be at play, says Brown. For instance, this intervention may slow the breakdown of beta-amyloid 42 by the liver, leading to higher amounts in the bloodstream, he says. Future studies could get around this by injecting markers into cerebrospinal fluid, which moves through the glymphatic system, to more directly measure its flow, says Brown. Additional experiments by Kiviniemi and his colleagues tested either only the mattress vibrations or only the nitric oxide pills on the same participants, at least a week before or after they underwent the combined approach. Based on brain scans, these solo interventions seemed to have less than half the effect on the glymphatic system than when they were combined.
The findings have been published in the journal Nature Communications.

Magic Fingers was onto something

By sinkskinkshrieks • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread
Insert $ 0.25 to reduce plaque buildup.

Big in Japan

By GeekWithAKnife • • Score: 4, Funny • Thread
Apparently the vibrating mattress can also help loose other kinds of protein!

Re:Debunked…

By Going_Digital • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread
I don’t know about fraudulent, but drugs that reduce beta-amyloid plaques have been developed, but have shown little to no improvement in dementia symptoms. This suggests there may not be a direct causal relationship, and that beta-amyloid may be symptomatic of another cause.

Re:Debunked…

By dvice • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

You are probably talking about this:
https://katiecouric.com/health….

Lesné’s paper claimed that they found a specific subtype of amyloid protein which causes memory loss. Fraud was that the data was altered using software.

The general link between beta-amyloid and Alzheimer’s still exist in the research.

Methodology

By Jarik C-Bol • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
It’s rather refreshing to see a medical science article that both admits to the limitations of their study, and lays out a pathway to continue the study and address those limitations. So many ‘medical breakthrough’ articles get published touting some new miracle treatment, only for the reader to find its ‘in mice’ or the study was done without any double blind controls, on a test group of 3 patients, rendering the results anecdotal at best. This article at least admits the limitations of what they have done so far, and appears to propose ways/plans to actually study this correctly.

Mexico’s Senate Approves ISP Rules To Disconnect Persistent Online Pirates

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from TorrentFreak:
On Tuesday, Mexico’s Senate approved (PDF) a reform of the Federal Copyright Law that ties ISP liability to having a policy to terminate repeat infringers. [This policy has to be published permanently on their website and in their terms of service, and it must include a basic way to notify users. In other words, what can be terminated is the Internet connection itself, not just an account. According to Mexican business outlet EL CEO, this means that access providers such as Telmex and Izzi will need such a policy.] The Senate approved the amendments with roughly two-thirds of the vote, as the opposition voted against. The Chamber of Deputies already approved the same text in October, so the decree now goes to President Claudia Sheinbaum. Her government proposed the changes in May to bring the law in line with the USMCA trade agreement between Mexico, the United States and Canada.

[…] Providers that don’t comply risk facing liability. Under the new rules, any ISP that fails to meet its safe harbor conditions becomes liable for its users’ infringements if it knowingly contributes to, induces, or causes the infringement. The same goes for an ISP that can control the infringing user and profits directly from the infringement. In both cases, the Mexican Institute of Industrial Property (IMPI) can fine the provider up to roughly 4.7 million pesos (~$250,000), depending on the infringement. The law doesn’t explicitly define the term repeat infringer, nor does it say how many piracy accusations it takes before a subscriber can be cut off. According to Aurora Lopez-Portillo, director of legal services at IP firm ClarkeModet, each provider has to decide its own threshold. She told EL CEO that ISPs should also check whether the accusations actually hold up, while giving users a chance to respond, even though the law doesn’t require that.

During Tuesday’s Senate debate, some lawmakers in the opposition raised similar concerns. Senator Gabriel Elizondo warned that families can share a single connection, so the pirating activities of one person could leave an entire household offline. Previously, opposition lawmakers proposed requiring a court order before Internet service could be suspended, but that proposal was not adopted. […] There, failing to meet the safe harbor conditions, including the repeat infringer policy, is the first requirement for liability. If an ISP also contributes to infringement with knowledge of it, or can control the infringer and directly profits from it, it can be held responsible. The new repeat infringer rules will take effect 180 days after their publication in Mexico’s official gazette, which hasn’t happened yet as far as we can see. How Mexican ISPs will define a repeat infringer, and how many accusations it takes, has yet to be seen.

Most piracy is done through residential proxies

By xack • • Score: 3 • Thread
That is spread through malware and social engineering. A lot of people are going to get mistakenly disconnected because of malware on their system. I hope they realize that disconnecting a lot of people that are not technically inclined enough to know about the malware on their system is going to lead to a lot of complaints and unrest.

data centers

By smillie • • Score: 3 • Thread
Will they be blocking those LLM data centers from scraping the net?

Accusations?

By Sloppy • • Score: 3 • Thread

The law doesn’t explicitly define the term repeat infringer, nor does it say how many piracy accusations it takes before a subscriber can be cut off.

[emphasis mine] Surely they mean convictions, no?

Why would accusations be relevant? I accuse every single member of the Mexican government of having violated the copyright on my work, four times each. They all did it four times. No, I can’t prove it, but the accusation stands.

EU Says TikTok’s ‘Rabbit Hole’ Effect Must Stop

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
The European Commission has preliminarily found that TikTok violates the Digital Services Act because its For You recommendation algorithm can create a “rabbit hole effect,” repeatedly exposing users to potentially harmful content involving topics such as sadness, isolation and body image. TikTok must change the feed’s design or potentially face fines of up to 6% of its global annual revenue. The Verge reports:
The findings come months after the EU Commission declared that TikTok’s design is too “addictive.” While TikTok has implemented controls to mitigate the algorithm’s “rabbit hole effect,” the Commission says its preliminary findings suggest that they’re not effective. TikTok must now change the design of its For You feed, or else face fines of up to 6 percent of its global annual turnover. The platform is also facing pressure in the US, with lawmakers and a wave of lawsuits raising concerns about child safety.
“Every time a user scrolls or likes a video on TikTok, the algorithm serves more of the same leading users down rabbit holes they cannot easily escape from,” Henna Virkkunen, the EU Commission’s executive vice president of tech sovereignty, security, and democracy, says in the press release. “Today’s preliminary findings show again that TikTok needs to step up its efforts to protect users’ well-being, including those of minors.”

Legislated to… suck more?

By Powercntrl • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

Maybe it’s just me, but I’ve personally experienced the opposite of the so-called “rabbit hole effect” from algorithmic feeds. The first few videos might be decent, but the more I doomscroll, the more it seems like it scrapes the bottom of the content barrel. Before long, I’m just done with it and close the app because it’s just serving up stuff that’s no longer entertaining. Of course, my generation grew up with 57 Channels (And Nothin’ On), so we turned our entertainment off when it ceased to be worth watching. Also, the TV stayed at home, so that was a bit of a limiting factor, too.

What I don’t get about this is that the summary already mentions that the content is making some people depressed. How exactly do they think those people are going to feel when the algorithm is tweaked to serve up even worse content, ostensibly to break their addiction? I’m getting the feeling this was the only solution they could come up with, because imposing actual screen time limits upon adults is still just a little too authoritarian (but you know they’d do it if they could).

Re:Legislated to… suck more?

By martin-boundary • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

When I line up for my morning coffee, it’s still shocking to me seeing people in the queue with their eyes glued on their tiktok’s and swiping uninterruptedly. They basically stay 1.5-2 seconds on every video and swipe, for minutes at a time. This is not an isolated case.

Addiction and depression are facts of life. There is a percentage of the population who are caught up in it. Companies should not get a free pass to hurt these people by creating one size fits all products and advertising those products to everybody indiscriminately.

Same argument with children. A child is not an adult, and should not be marketed towards and given an adult experience.

It’s time the tech bros are taught a lesson about building products that actually do the right thing by the norms of European society. Or they can just get the hell out of the European market, and tell their investors that the TAM has just been halved.

Re: People are sheep. The state is their shepherd.

By Gravis Zero • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

If I were an EU citizen, I could refrain from using tiktok. But I could not refrain from living under a government that thinks I’m a child.

Given the sophomoric nature of your regular posts, you are a child. Have you still not realized that the very things you scream for are also the things destroying this nation?

Re:People are sheep. The state is their shepherd.

By CaptQuark • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Unfortunately I fear YouTube is a bit more savvy than that.

I watch YouTube videos signed in on my Google TV and it suggests topics that I have shown an interest in or have subscribed to interesting channels.

Occasionally I will look up a topic and watch a YouTube video on my computer using a private/incognito session with cookies and histories deleted. Even with these precautions I will notice some topics will pop up on my TV, even though it should not have associated my computer private browsing with my TV account.

For example, if I do a private session search on my computer for “Shoebill storks”, after watching a few videos I will notice that topic will start to pepper my Recommended videos. This has happened more than once for topics like unusual birds, actor’s biographies, and musical groups. One notable example was when I watched “Hoist the Colours by The Bass Singers” in a private session. I wanted to hear the song but not have every pirate song or bass singer appear in my Recommended list. The next day that happened even after trying to keep everything separate.

My working hypothesis is they can tell my IP address for my logged in TV account and tie private searches from that IP address to my account. This has happened at least six times. At least I’m lucky they don’t cross link my wife’s cooking and gardening topics into my Recommended list.

Re:People are sheep. The state is their shepherd.

By PseudoIdiot • • Score: 4, Informative • Thread
Oh how wrong you are. You are tracked by IP, MAC, hardware IDs, your browser fingerprints that include your OS, language, time zone, screen size, pixel ratio, touch support, how many available CPU threads you have, approximate RAM, your GPU renderer, your installed fonts, how Canvas/WebGL/and audio tests behave, your HTTP headers, your TCP behavior, your HTTPS handshake, your JA3 and JA4 fingerprints, your TLS options… among other things. You leave a unique signature everywhere you go on that computer.

Chainalysis Says Breach Exposed Credentials For All Customers

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Chainalysis says attackers exposed usernames, password hashes and live tokens for all of its customers. “While the company locked Chainalysis accounts as a precaution after discovering that some customers’ passwords had been exposed and asked users to reset their passwords before signing in again, it has now taken the login portal offline, together with Reactor and Data Solutions, the Know-Your-Transaction (KYT) user interface and API, and address screening products, after discovering further abnormal activity,” reports BleepingComputer.

The company says it has no evidence that investigative data or blockchain attribution records were accessed or altered, but all users will be required to reset passwords and rotate API keys before regaining access. BleepingComputer reports:
Chainalysis provides blockchain analysis tools to trace cryptocurrency transactions and investigate crimes such as fraud, ransomware, and money laundering. Its customer list includes law enforcement, government agencies, financial institutions, insurance companies, and cryptocurrency businesses worldwide. This follows the company’s disclosure last Friday that attackers using AI tools accessed customers’ names, email addresses, user IDs, and organizational role labels using what it described as “offensive agentic techniques.”

While it initially said the impact was limited and the breach affected only non-sensitive identity metadata, later updates revealed that usernames and password hashes for all customers were exposed in an “on-path attack” (more commonly known as a Man-in-the-Middle or MITM attack). However, the company found no evidence that the attackers accessed investigative graph data or altered its blockchain attribution repositories. […] To ensure threat actors don’t access affected accounts, Chainalysis asked customers to provide trusted IP addresses so they can regain access to the login portal once it is brought back online and reset their credentials.

Makes sense

By Local ID10T • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Chainalysis provides blockchain analysis tools to trace cryptocurrency transactions and investigate crimes such as fraud, ransomware, and money laundering.

I can see why certain people would want them taken out. Just this week there were a few Billion reasons…

Activists Breach Microsoft Data Center Construction Site As Protests Spread In Europe

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot
More than 100 activists breached a Microsoft AI data center construction site in Amsterdam as part of coordinated protests against the rapid expansion of AI infrastructure. “These data centres are destroying our world. It’s becoming uninhabitable because of all the resources they consume. That’s why we’re here today,” protester Sam van der Beek said. Reuters reports:
Activist groups have announced actions in 16 countries on Friday and Saturday, according to the "Stop Dirty Data Centers" coalition, which is rallying environmental groups and digital rights campaigns behind calls to pause large-scale construction. In Amsterdam on Friday, more than 100 activists gathered at the construction site of a Microsoft AI data centre, marching arm in arm before breaking into the site, climbing cranes, hanging balloons and dancing while police stood by. Some carried placards with messages reading: “Screw your datacenter.”

Site owner Pure Data Centers, which plans to invest more than $1 billion and is backed by Brookfield-owned Oaktree, said it was committed to engagement with local stakeholders. “We respectfully ask those on site to leave safely and engage with us in dialogue about the development and any concerns they may have,” it said. Other planned actions include a march in Dublin, a protest outside the parliament building in Warsaw, and a demonstration against a different Microsoft data centre in Denmark. […] Stop Dirty Data Centers says it is not anti-progress or calling for existing data centers to be closed but that major construction should be halted until governments establish clearer rules.

Re:Sigh

By karmawarrior • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Well yeah, our search results are shit these days because Google is, from what I can tell, intentionally enshittifying it to push people towards Gemini.

And what does AI have to do with Amazon package delivery? Anything at all?

Or are you ignorant of what the complaints are about “data centers”. Nobody’s opposing classic data centers here. They’re opposing AI buildings. And they should. And you should too.

But you don’t.

Because you’re easy manipulated by the chatbot. It makes you feel good! It tells you what a good boy you are and how your ideas are so good all the time. Over and over again. And… you’ve only ever suffered abuse your entire life. Constant being told your ideas are bad. That your code isn’t good. And here it is, a dopamine inducing device that praises you for the first time in your life. And you don’t want to consider the possibility it might be terrible. It might be making you dumber - but it is. It might be saying those things… because it’s been programmed to, in order to prop up an unsustainable business just long enough to make everyone dependent upon it, which it is. Trillions of dollars diverted from things that might actually help people into creating RAM shortages, destroying privacy, destroying incentives to create, and creating dependencies on sociopath-run businesses in the hope that, after crypto and other scams failed, this might be the one, the tech that’ll steal the economy. And you’ve fallen for it.

So you repeat this tired and obviously bad faith criticism of anti-data center protestors because you’ve been indoctrinated into a cybercult so fucking thick you don’t even consider how much of an out of touch moron you appear by pretending this isn’t about AI.

I don’t think I’m going to get through to you, but to those reading this and being on that knifeedge of thinking “This karmawarrior guy’s a bit mean” while for the first time wondering why it is that the chatbots insist on the ridiculous over the top fawning behavior, why the studies show AI is causing skill losses among its users, why so much money is being poured into tech that cannot possibly make a profit, and why the peer reviewed studies seem to say one thing about AI productivity (spoiler! in most cases, it’s not having a massive impact) and programmers who are using the tech enthusiastically are saying another (10X productivity!!!?!)… think about those things some more, and draw the obvious conclusions.

Europe is always ahead of us these days

By BitterEpic • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

I’m finding myself using more and more European services because because US big tech dropped the ball . Mudita. Tutanota. Fairphone. SailfishOS. pCloud.

I hope in the next 5 years we have protestors in the US like this. I’m surprised they even found out the owner. In the US we don’t even have that right. Particularly the datacenters that would be built next to your house using a jet engine as a generator.

Re:Sigh

By thegarbz • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

The vast majority of Dutch land is used for farming. The Dutch are the second largest farmers in the world (behind the USA who has 20x the population), and the most intensive farming activity both per capita and per surface area of any country by a very significant margin. They have some of the worst nitrogen emissions in Europe, worse than the major and significantly larger industrial (and farming) powerhouse Germany, and the majority of those emissions are from farming. And they have the most concentrated farming practices in the world.

Tell us again what the parent is misunderstanding?

Re:Hyoperbole much?

By test321 • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

I guess we’ll see them go after Procteor and Gamble for the products they produce that are destroying the world.

They don’t have to do that. You have to pick your fights. Say, some people donate to the WWF or Greenpeace to “save the planet”, others donate to whatever other causes like clean ocans, clean air, whatever, also to “save the planet”. You can’t take all of the fights. The fellows above picked “Datacenters” as their fight. Maybe they have more spare time and fight something else. Or maybe they don’t have more spare time and only picked up this one. That their fight against “destroying the world” remains incomplete does not remove its value. Other activists will pick the other fights.

Re:Sigh

By dskoll • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Nah. The Dutch are extremely chill and friendly. They’re also smart and pragmatic and really, really good at engineering. They do call out bullshit and complain when warranted, though, because they’re also very direct and don’t have time for nonsense. I think it’s this directness that takes some people by surprise.