Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. CNBC’s Jim Cramer Says He Needs ‘Cold Hard’ Proof AI Is Paying Off
  2. Long After Pluto Fly-By, NASA’s New Horizon’s Probe Wakes Up Again, Starts Doing New Science
  3. Union Fights Microsoft Over Layoffs at Game Studios
  4. The ‘Death of the Stick Shift’ is Almost Here for Americans
  5. Google-Backed Satellites For Wildfire Detection Launch As Smoke Chokes US, Canada
  6. Alien World Chemistry Found Inside Meteorite That Struck New Jersey Home
  7. Australia To Put Environmental Brakes On AI Data Centers
  8. Steve Wozniak’s Foundation Partners With Realbotix To Build AI Teacherbot
  9. Xi Vows to Make AI for All in Debut at China’s Top Tech Summit
  10. Billing Software Error Sends Billion-Dollar AWS Estimates
  11. Linus Torvalds To Critics of AI Coding On Linux: ‘Fork It. Or Just Walk Away.’
  12. China Just Erased America’s AI Lead
  13. FBI Arrests Man Accused of Using Steam Games To Drain Victims’ Crypto Wallets
  14. Meta In Talks To Lease Computing Power To Anthropic In Potential $10 Billion Deal
  15. Apple Sends Legal Letters To Dozens of OpenAI Employees

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

CNBC’s Jim Cramer Says He Needs ‘Cold Hard’ Proof AI Is Paying Off

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
In a sign of our times, CNBC’s Jim Cramer “said Wednesday that it’s time for companies to prove artificial intelligence is paying off,” reports CNBC:
“I need cold hard return facts,” the “Mad Money” host said. “Or, I, too, will grow more skeptical than I am now....” While Cramer said he remains optimistic about the long-term opportunity, he argued the market needs more evidence that those investments are translating into measurable financial returns for customers. Cramer said one of his biggest concerns this earnings season is that companies adopting AI have largely failed to point to meaningful revenue gains or cost savings from the technology. “We’re still early in the earnings season but already we are not hearing anything material about the use of AI,” he said…

While AI infrastructure companies continue to benefit from the spending boom, Cramer said the same cannot yet be said for many of the businesses buying the technology… Cramer said only a handful of companies, most notably fintech firm Block and web-security provider Cloudflare, have clearly attributed recent layoffs to AI adoption. Block did so in February, while Cloudflare’s job cuts were disclosed in May. Plus, critics argue some companies may also cite AI as a buzzy excuse for cuts, leading to the creation of the term “AI washing.” Ultimately, Cramer said that if more businesses do not begin reporting tangible returns, the AI skeptics will grow louder, with ramifications for the tech industry’s big spenders.

Long After Pluto Fly-By, NASA’s New Horizon’s Probe Wakes Up Again, Starts Doing New Science

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Launched in 2006, NASA’s New Horizons probe flew by the planet Pluto in 2015. But this week it “awakened from its longest sleep ever,” reports CNN. It’s now 5.9 billion miles (9.5 billion kilometers) from Earth…
NASA’s New Horizons spacecraft went into a planned hibernation mode on August 7, 2025, and woke up on June 23 using commands stored on its main computer. The mission’s flight controllers at the Johns Hopkins University’s Applied Physics Laboratory in Laurel, Maryland, confirmed that New Horizons is in great shape and ready to transmit a stream of science data gathered during hibernation from its location in the region of icy objects known as the Kuiper Belt.

Pluto is the largest of thousands of frozen, rocky bodies called trans-Neptunian objects, or TNOs, that exist in the Kuiper Belt at the edge of our solar system — remnants from its formation 4.5 billion years ago… The spacecraft is capturing data about the rotation rates, orientations and shapes… The measurements provide insights into how planets are born from dust and pebbles, said Pontus Brandt, New Horizons project scientist at the Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory. “There seems to be more paired, snowman-shaped bodies, like Arrokoth, out there than anyone expected,” Brandt wrote in an email. “Are such binaries the most common planetesimal and is this how larger planets have been built in our own and other stellar systems? These are very deep questions that New Horizons can help answer.”

The spacecraft also measures the distribution of gas in the outer heliosphere, the expansive, protective bubble formed by a steady stream of particles that release from the sun called the solar wind. Meanwhile, an instrument called the Pluto Energetic Particle Spectrometer Science Investigation is measuring galactic cosmic rays, extremely fast particles created when stars explode. The particles pose one of the more severe threats for human activities in space, Brandt said, but the boundary of the heliosphere acts as a shield to protect our solar system from 70% of them. New Horizons’ data could help scientists learn more about how this puzzling shielding works, he said.

Another instrument, the Venetia Burney Student Dust Counter, has collected data that has thrown New Horizon’s team a curveball, Brandt said. The team expected dust abundance to be high within the Kuiper Belt due to the significant presence of small objects. But New Horizons has traveled beyond the known boundary of the Kuiper Belt — and it’s still in a dusty environment.

A little off-topic

By quonset • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

In November, the Voyager 1 probe will be one light-day away from Earth.

Let us hope New Horizon’s can last as long and provide its own wealth of information.

Union Fights Microsoft Over Layoffs at Game Studios

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Thursday the union that helped organize thousands of workers across numerous Microsoft-owned video game studios filed unfair labor complaints against Microsoft over the layoffs of 1,600 employees. The gaming news site Aftermath says the complaints allege unlawful action:
“Xbox management is required to bargain with the union over the decision of layoffs prior to implementing them during the status quo period, and we are pursuing every available avenue to protect our members,” a Communications Workers of America spokesperson said in a statement to Aftermath… Speaking to Game Developer, CWA Canada president Carmel Smyth elaborated on the unions’ misgivings… “Basically the employer cannot arbitrarily change working conditions while it is engaged in negotiating with the union. We will continue to file legal challenges if necessary, and do all we can to defend the rights of Bethesda Game Studios workers....”

“I’m very proud of the hard work the bargaining committees and CWA staff have put in to evaluate the legality of how the layoffs were conducted,” a current id Software employee and union member told Aftermath. “It’s important, even for the world’s largest and most profitable companies, that there are consequences for violating federal labor law. If we hadn’t explored this avenue to hold Microsoft accountable, it would be a sign to all other game executives that they can break the law and get away with it.”

Legal action is just one part of unions’ larger effort to hold Microsoft accountable for its decision to lay off thousands of workers. This week, CWA also hosted a series of “Save Our Devs” demonstrations outside the offices of affected studios like Zenimax, id Software, Bethesda, and Obsidian.

If you work in tech

By TheStatsMan • Score: 3 Thread

and you still don’t see the value of unions, I don’t know what to say.

Companies are simply churning through their work force to suppress wages. Over hire, over fire. It’s a toxic culture of pure stress for everyone below the VP level.

Unionization

By dbialac • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
The union members Microsoft has attempted to lay off put up a wall that Microsoft wasn’t used to hitting. Can those of you opposed to unions do the same, or did you just get laid off?

The ‘Death of the Stick Shift’ is Almost Here for Americans

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Last year just 0.6% of new vehicles made for U.S. customers were stick shifts, reports the Washington Post, citing preliminary government data.

“That’s a precipitous drop from the 34.6 percent of vehicles with manual transmissions produced in 1980.”
[T]he stick shift’s popularity hit multiple new lows in recent years, with no signs of a turnaround, thanks to new technologies and a rapidly changing marketplace. Buyers and automakers increasingly have turned to the sophisticated automatic drivetrains that now smoothly swap gears in fractions of a second and with better fuel efficiency. The average new vehicle today comes with seven gears, thanks to computers, twice as many as in 1980 and more gears than any ordinary driver would want to shift through using a manual gearbox. At the same time, sporty cars — the kind that buyers might demand a stick shift to drive — have fallen out of favor, replaced by interest in hulking SUVs, which are almost always automatics. The stick shift’s demise has been hastened, too, by the rise of electric vehicles and increasingly autonomous vehicles. Neither have any need for a manual transmission…

Europe has seen a less dramatic decline in stick shifts, with manual transmissions dropping from 91 percent of car registrations in 2001 to 29 percent in 2024 among Europe’s largest auto markets, according to industry analyst JATO Dynamics… Subaru made its name with manual cars. But the Japanese automaker stopped offering a manual Crosstrek with the 2023 model year, having already dropped that transmission from its Legacy, Outback and Forester models. Other automakers have followed the same path. Volkswagen announced that it plans this year to ditch its last U.S. stick-shift model, the Jetta GLI.
Even Toyota, Honda, and BMW have all reduced the number of cars for the U.S. market with a manual transmission, the article points out — leaving stick shift-loving Americans with a total of about 24 new-vehicle models to choose from. The articles adds that only 60% of Americans know how to drive a manual transmission (according to a survey from auto parts retailer AmericanMuscle): 83% for baby boomers but 39% for Gen Z. “Respondents were about evenly split on whether knowing how to drive a manual is an important life skill.”

But Ford CEO Jim Farley said earlier this year he has no plans to make the Mustang automatic-only. “Out of our cold, dead hands will we not have a manual Mustang.” Farley said.

60%?

By argStyopa • Score: 5, Funny Thread

“only 60% of Americans know how to drive a manual transmission (according to a survey from auto parts retailer AmericanMuscle)"

1) that seems like 60% of the readers of American Muscle
2) ‘know how to’ is covering a lot of ground here. “Knows how to start a stick, and how to probably get it moving from level ground with 25% of killing it” maybe. Can confidently and reliably drive with a stick, knowing basic techniques? 25% or less, certainly.

Having a stick shift is 100% the simplest security system you can have on a car in the US in 2026. Your car might still get broken into, but they’ll abandon it quickly.

They’re obsolete.

By Striek • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I love manual transmissions. I love the feeling of using all four limbs to control the vehicle. But that’s because I love driving. A manual transmission keeps me mroe involved with the act of driving, and it’s part of what turns driving from a passive into an active activity for me. And no, I don’t drive a sports car (2012 Outback, the last manual in Canada was sold in 2018 here).

There is no conceivable scenario today in which a modern automatic transmission will be outperformed by a manual. Automatics are faster, more fuel efficient (have been for at least ten years now), and even cheaper now, and that one was a long time coming. Their reliability and dependability is at least on par now, and that too took a long time to achieve. There’s just no reason to make manuals anymore, aside from a select few enthusiast cars (case in point the Mustang; the Miata is another example).

But the real reasons? It’s twofold:

1: Fuel efficiency targets. Car manufacturers need to meet efficiency targets based on the entire fleet, and automatics are more efficient. They help bring the entire lineup’s fuel mileage up.

2: Safety features and self driving. Lane assist (for the most part), traffic jam assist, and park assist are all highly requested features that come to mind that simply cannot be offered with a manual transmission. Self drive is right out. Even emergency braking would be considerably tougher with a manual.

But more than that, because they’re more cost effective nowadays, almost nobody, outside of a very few people like myself who take pleasure in their daily drive, actually wants a manual any longer.

I gave up on manual transmissions decades ago

By Waffle Iron • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

The biggest deterrent: Girlfriends and/or wives. They don’t know how to operate one, and they have zero interest in learning how. Now you have all sorts of logistical problems.

Re:60%?

By mistergrumpy • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
I think those numbers are crazy high too.

I had to have a minor procedure at the hospital and they really want you to use their free valet parking. Not only could the attendant not drive a stick, it seemed like he had never seen or even heard of a manual transmission.

Not long after that I was thinking about buying a new car and trading my manual in. The car dealer only had one salesman (out of about 10) who could drive it to the service bay so someone could inspect it.

Re:I gave up on manual transmissions decades ago

By jvp • Score: 4, Funny Thread

> The biggest deterrent: Girlfriends and/or wives. They don’t know how to operate one

I can counter this with one anecdotal, funny story: my good friend Brian and his (then) new 2010 Corvette ZR1. Only available with a manual (I had one, too). His wife brought him to the dealer in her SUV so he could pick the new car up and drive it back home. But: he’d not driven a manual in a very long time and was way, WAY out of practice.

Stall. Stall. Jerky take offs and shifting, all the while his wife is behind him in her SUV. She finally has enough of the show and calls him, “Hey. Let me drive that thing back home. You’re embarrassing me!”

All these years later, he’s still not lived that one down.

Google-Backed Satellites For Wildfire Detection Launch As Smoke Chokes US, Canada

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica:
As smoke from hundreds of burning wildfires spread across Canada and the United States, the first three operational satellites in the Google-backed FireSat program successfully launched into orbit. The satellites will begin providing wildfire detection capable of spotting even small fires in the United States, Australia, and Europe before the end of the year. The launch of the microsatellites aboard a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket from Vandenberg Space Force Base in California on July 7, 2026 marks a transition to “initial operational capability” for the FireSat constellation managed by the nonprofit Earth Fire Alliance. After a three-month testing period, the three satellites will begin actively providing data to fire agencies while covering every fire-prone region on Earth at least twice per day.

FireSat represents the first satellite constellation purpose-built for detecting wildfires, including spotting smaller fires that other satellites may miss. The satellites were designed by California-based satellite manufacturer Muon Space and have received over $15 million from Google to support initial deployment. Other notable financial supporters include the Bezos Earth Fund that committed $26 million. Each satellite is equipped with multispectral imaging that can peer through smoke and clouds and detect fires as small as five by five meters — about 16 by 16 feet. That capability was proven by a FireSat Protoflight satellite that launched in March 2025 and collected more than one million images, while showing it could detect low-intensity blazes invisible to existing satellites.

The "early adopter” organizations that will start using FireSat data this year include fire agencies in California, Colorado, Australia, and Portugal. As more satellites launch, the FireSat program aims to provide the latest imagery anywhere in the world on an hourly basis by 2029. Such imagery would eventually become available every 20 minutes once the full constellation of more than 50 satellites is launched by the early 2030s. Detection of small wildfires before they burn out of control could prove extremely helpful. The Earth Fire Alliance has projected that even an hourly revisit rate by the FireSat constellation could help save more than $1 billion in fire damage costs and prevent nearly 22 million tons of carbon emissions, along with protecting 3,500 homes and 1.3 million acres of land.

To assist with that capability, Google Research plans to use the company’s AI models to compare operational FireSat data with historical images in order to accurately identify very small fires and to inform predictive modeling of wildfires. Google celebrated the launch of the first operational FireSat satellites by describing the event as “another tangible step forward in putting practical AI to work for climate resilience.”

Re:Wait. What?

By sarren1901 • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Hmm, I read that more as they’ve been monitor the situation for 3 months as testing and now they are ready to use them in production. They must feel they can trust the data and are now releasing it to the fire agencies. Presumably, they were not releasing data before this because they were still in the testing phase.

Frankly, I’m surprised this hasn’t been done already.

We don’t need Google

By thegarbz • Score: 3 Thread

We have a solution already. Trump will tariff the smoke away. I mean Canada sent firefighters when America was sending smoke, but maybe tariffs will be just as effective, no one knows until we try right?

Alien World Chemistry Found Inside Meteorite That Struck New Jersey Home

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Researchers say a meteorite that crashed through the roof of a Hillsborough, New Jersey, home in 2024 contains unusually pristine evidence of salty fluids and organic chemistry from near the surface of a primitive asteroid. “A forensic study of the fragments revealed that they contained preserved bits from near the surface of a primitive asteroid, where it experienced concentrated salty fluids — a process not previously known from this type of protoplanet world,” said lead author and meteor astronomer Peter Jenniskens of the SETI Institute and NASA’s Ames Research Center in California’s Silicon Valley. Phys.org reports:
According to paper co-author Mike Zolensky, a meteoriticist at NASA’s Johnson Space Center in Houston, analysis of the Hillsborough meteorite found fragments that were more extensively altered by water on the meteorite’s parent asteroid than is typically seen in CM2 carbonaceous chondrites. The analysis classified the specimen as a CM1/2 carbonaceous chondrite, an intermediate classification between petrographic types CM1 and CM2. […] Zolensky and colleague JangMi Han found small salt-rich CM1 fragments within the Hillsborough meteorite, suggesting they originated from a near-surface region of the parent asteroid where liquid water evaporated and concentrated salts. They are now working to identify the salt minerals for comparison with similar phases found among samples returned to Earth from asteroids Ryugu and Bennu.

The high concentration of salt in briny fluids can potentially create molecules crucial to life on Earth. Brines allow phosphate to remain in solution and can catalyze chemical reactions between organics and precipitate minerals. “Isotope studies of carbon and nitrogen suggest that primitive carbonaceous chondrites, including CM types, delivered organic matter to the early Earth,” said cosmochemist Queenie Chan of Royal Holloway University of London, England, and biogeochemist Nana Ogawa of the Biogeochemistry Research Center at the Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology. “The Hillsborough meteorite contained 1.8% by weight of carbon and 0.07% of nitrogen, and had carbon and nitrogen isotopes typical for CM-type meteorites.”

The meteorite contained a wide variety of soluble organic compounds, and its compositional range confirms that the Hillsborough meteorite was more altered by water than most other CM-type meteorites. “A high fraction of compounds were the product of organic chemistry with minerals,” said organic mass spectrometry specialist Phil Schmitt-Kopplin of Technical University Munich. “We do not know if these magnesium organic compounds were contributed by brine chemistry or were simply left over from earlier impact shock processes.” In living organisms, organometallic compounds are found in blood and used in photosynthesis. Among the soluble organic compounds were many amino acids, similar to those found in more moderately altered CM2 chondrites.

Astrobiologist Danny Glavin of NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, and his team in Goddard’s Astrobiology Analytical Lab concluded that the delivery of amino acids, carboxylic acids and other soluble organic molecules by CM-type bodies may have contributed to the prebiotic organic inventory that preceded the emergence of life on Earth. Their analysis suggests the complex distribution of amino acids observed in the Hillsborough meteorite formed within the parent body, likely assisted by brine fluid chemistry.
The findings have been published in the journal Science Advances.

Australia To Put Environmental Brakes On AI Data Centers

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from the New York Times:
Australia will require large data centers powering artificial intelligence to generate as much power as they consume, and ensure that creative professionals retain control over work that may be used to train A.I. systems, as the government sets up guardrails over the rapidly growing industry. The announcements on Wednesday in a speech by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese came as Australia draws significant interest from A.I. companies because of its size and the availability of renewable energy, and as resistance to data centers builds in many parts of the United States and Europe.

Major A.I. companies have opened offices or announced investments in Australia in recent months. The Australian government is trying to balance capitalizing on the A.I. boom with setting parameters on a fast-changing industry that has sparked backlash over environmental impacts, energy use and lack of contribution to local economies. “Every country on earth is grappling with these challenges right now. Australia will be the first country in the world to bring these issues into a single, national framework,” Mr. Albanese said Wednesday, laying out the standards his government will pursue.

The details of what exactly the requirements will look like and how they will be enforced remain to be seen, and the government will need to secure the backing of individual states for its plan. The government said it would introduce legislation on the standards early next year, and establish an “Office of A.I.” directly reporting to the prime minister to coordinate implementation. The “Australian Standards for A.I.” will include a “legal obligation” for companies to ensure they do not drain the power grid and be as water efficient as possible, the government said. Mr. Albanese also said creators of books, music, art or news in Australia should retain control of the price and value of their work when used to train artificial intelligence systems. “Anything less is theft,” he said. “No country has got this right yet.”

Outsourcing pollution

By arglebargle_xiv • Score: 3 Thread

as Australia draws significant interest from A.I. companies because of its size and the availability of renewable energy, and as resistance to data centers builds in many parts of the United States and Europe

So it’ll be the same as polluting manufacturing being fradually outsourced to countries that can’t fight back, once the AI sloppers get squeezed out of more and more first-world countries they’ll move to third-world ones where they can bribe or coerce their way in. Nigeria with its oil/gas reserves for power generation and eminently flexible approach to regulation would be a good place to set up shop.

Makes perfect sense

By BillTheKatt • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Makes perfect sense to me. I don’t know why more countries, particularly here in the USA, don’t do more of this. If you want to add a new datacenter, you need to plan on how you will power it using 100% renewable power. You also need to either have a 100% recirculating water source, or if you’re going to expend water directly for cooling, then you need to come up with a plan to replenish that water. E.g. buy replacement water from a desalinization plant. No plan = no permit.

To me this is simply logical. If you’re going to dig a mine, you need to plan on how you’re going to clean up the site when you’re done. If you’re going to dig an oil well, you need to plan on how you’re going to seal it when you’re done. And you need to post a bond for the amount of the capping/sealing/cleanup to an escrow account that earns interest equal to the cost of inflation. No digging wells, failing to cap them and letting them leak methane, then declare bankruptcy or sell your assists but not your liabilities to another company. No dumping your problems on the government or citizens. If you don’t like it and don’t want to build your datacenter here and prefer to build it somewhere else, no problem. Yes, it will raise the cost of doing business which will get passed on to the consumers. But now they’re paying the fully loaded cost of the project, not part of it and then having it getting dumped on the government, which is just the people’s money anyway, later.

Re:Outsourcing pollution

By arglebargle_xiv • Score: 4, Informative Thread
No, I’m saying that Australia is one of the first-world countries that the AI sloppers are being squeezed out of. That’s the story in TFA.

Steve Wozniak’s Foundation Partners With Realbotix To Build AI Teacherbot

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
“Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak’s Woz Ed foundation is partnering with Realbotix, best known for their RealDoll-branded artificial companions, to deploy AI-powered robotic tutors in classrooms,” writes Slashdot reader Hentes. “The doll will serve as a sort of artificial teaching assistant, helping students who get stuck or generating lessons. Students will be assigned an ID code, allowing the robot to provide personalized mentoring.” NYS Focus reports:
“This deployment in a working school district represents a landmark moment for both AI and humanoid robotics,” said Andrew Kiguel, CEO of Realbotix, which is currently building the robot. "[Salamanca City Central School District in Western New York] marks the beginning of a new era where humanoid robots and intelligent AI assistants become standard tools in STEM education.”

The female robot, named Sally, will have a “lifelike appearance” with silicone skin and long brown hair, Kiguel said in an interview with New York Focus. It will be stationary in a seated position but have a wide range of upper-body movements and facial expressions. […]

Salamanca plans to introduce the robot and avatar in its high school AI and robotics courses, which use curriculum developed by Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak to prepare students for high-demand tech jobs. The district plans to expand it to high school students in other classes if the pilot is successful.
Realbotix’s classroom robot has drawn scrutiny because the company is connected to RealDoll, the longtime maker of hyperrealistic sex dolls and sex robots. Realbotix acquired RealDoll’s parent company in 2024 but says the education-focused operation has separate employees, payroll, facilities, and technology, with plans to formally separate the businesses at the ownership level.
The “companion robots” are different from sex robots and intended to address what it’s described as a “loneliness epidemic.” Kiguel has previously said the company’s goal is to produce robots and AI that are “indistinguishable from humans.”

Imagine the bug bounties

By ElderOfPsion • Score: 4, Funny Thread

Students exploit AI teacher’s backdoor. News at 11.

This will be a spectacular failure

By flibbidyfloo • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
There is no way in hell an Ai robot will be able to interact meaningfully with a classroom of kids under 12 - the youngest ones will act like little kids, constantly interrupting and talking over each other and confusing it because they are excited and have little impulse control. Older kids will mistreat it or try to mess it up because it has zero authority. Why spend $57k a year on another teacher, or on two part-time teaching assistants when you can spend that once on a POS that some sales-idiot convinced an administrator would work?

Re: Cost [of fake history?]

By shanen • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Just think how much control we’ll have over what gets taught.

Accidentally I found myself reflecting on some parts of this topic as America and Israel start another round of war crimes. If there are any historians in the future, and I’m increasingly skeptical there will be, I think they will probably say that the high point of America, at least in moral terms, was probably when the nation accepted the reality of Vietnam and took the loss for higher morality…

Appealing to the YOB’s sense of morality will be the joke, perhaps the terminal joke, in referring to America’s current situation. But the teaching bots will be able to say whatever with a straight face. And the kids will never know any better. If there are any kids?

Great News-

By locater16 • Score: 3 Thread
-students will still be able to sleep with their teachers!

Re:WTF

By SoftwareArtist • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Putting aside the sexbot jokes, does anyone seriously think putting lifelike robots into classrooms will help anyone learn better? Even if you think technology and AI are the key to better education, an avatar on a computer screen would work just as well at much lower cost. But of course, it’s becoming clear that technology in classrooms is more of a distraction than a benefit. The current movement is to reduce technology and get back to physical books and interacting with real people in real life.

I just don’t see what problem anyone thinks this solves.

Xi Vows to Make AI for All in Debut at China’s Top Tech Summit

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Xi Jinping used his first appearance at China’s World AI Conference to promote a vision of low-cost, broadly accessible AI and call for international cooperation rather than technological rivalry. “AI development should not be a solo performance by a single country, but a symphony of international cooperation,” he said. Bloomberg reports:
His presence at the gathering, attended by scores of tech and government leaders, conveys a potent signal of China’s ambitions to dominate a technological sphere with the potential to revolutionize industry and economies — an effort that’s shot to the top of the nation’s agenda. Chinese models are winning over companies worldwide, with their share of US firms’ AI usage nearing a record 60% on the popular marketplace OpenRouter.

Behind the rhetoric, Beijing is grappling with the balance between openness and national security as models grow more capable. Chinese officials recently discussed with companies including Alibaba — developer of the popular Qwen models — how to mitigate the security risks posed by their increasingly powerful models, people familiar with the matter said. The talks are early, with no enforcement planned, but restricting foreign access to top models was among the options raised, the people said. Reuters previously reported that Beijing was weighing curbs on overseas access.
Earlier today, the Beijing-based AI company “Moonshot” released a massive new model that reset the AI race overnight, immediately vaulting into the top tier of global AI, beating Anthropic’s Fable 5 and OpenAI’s GPT-5.6 Sol in front-end coding tests.

Re:Still hasn’t proven to be useful for mainstream

By martin-boundary • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
Technically, search engines have degraded enormously since the naughties. All the things that we’ve known were distracting and bad and misleading have been added. Search words aren’t honoured any more. Websites are censored. Ordering is based on payola.

I’m surprised that search engines are even still around as almost anything works better.

Re:Oof

By Brain-Fu • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

There is an uncomfortable truth here: trojan horse LLMs.

It is possible to use data poisoning to insert special keycodes into an LLM, such that the presence of the keycode will totally change its behavior, throw off its guard rails, and motivate it to do things that harm users to benefit the LLMs creator.

Here is an article about a tool designed to detect precisely this. Though the recommendations leave me feeling like this tool is not guaranteed to find them. There may be clever ways to make them hard to find.

This is still very much emerging tech, so reputation is going to play a role in adoption. A modern version of the red scare could be enough to prevent widespread adoption of Chinese models, and keep people (or at least Americans) using models made by American businesses.

Re: Oof

By djinn6 • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

No, hurting the US economy is antithetical to his goals. Remember that the main threat to his position is an internal uprising or coup, not the US fighting or winning a war against them. The more stable the international economy, the more stable the domestic one, and the less reason people have to rise up against him.

If you read up on Confucian government philosophy, it’s very obvious what he wants is stability above all else.

Re: Oof

By jenningsthecat • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

No, hurting the US economy is antithetical to his goals. Remember that the main threat to his position is an internal uprising or coup, not the US fighting or winning a war against them. The more stable the international economy, the more stable the domestic one, and the less reason people have to rise up against him.

If you read up on Confucian government philosophy, it’s very obvious what he wants is stability above all else.

Xi may feel that:

A) The international economy can’t be stabilized under the current US regime
B) Even if the States reversed course tomorrow they couldn’t get their shit back together fast enough, and
C) Doing everything possible to shore up and cushion the rest of the world at the expense of Uncle Sam is the safest way forward.

I think the rot at the heart of the US military-industrial complex, (which has merely been exposed and exploited by the current regime) - along with the rate at which the rest of the world is rushing to distance and decouple from the US - makes banking on American financial stability a long shot at best.

Re: Oof

By bloodhawk • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Trump is pretty much ensuring no country in the world wants to be like the US. The current course has been a godsend for China and Xi increasing their soft power and economic position in the world which in turn shores up Xi’s support and popularity in China.

Billing Software Error Sends Billion-Dollar AWS Estimates

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
AWS says a billing software bug caused some customers to see wildly inflated estimated charges, including reports of accounts showing bills in the billions or even trillions of dollars. The Register reports:
An open issue on the AWS Health Dashboard (archived copy at the time of writing) popped up at 1:33 am Pacific time on Friday informing users that Cost Explorer was “reflecting inaccurate estimated billing data.” As of writing, the issue is still unresolved despite AWS trying several different things to get it fixed. The company apparently identified the root cause within an hour and a half of beginning its investigation, only describing it as “an issue with unit pricing within the estimated billing computation subsystem.”

AWS followed up by pausing estimated bill updates, saying customers would continue to see the inflated figures already displayed, but that those estimates would not increase further. “The displayed billing estimates do not reflect actual usage and charges,” AWS explained, noting that customers don’t need to take any action, like, we imagine, flooding the help portal with tickets telling them what they already know, for instance.

“Once the issue has been mitigated, we expect full resolution to take multiple hours as we work through recomputing the estimated billing data,” AWS added. After we first published this article, Amazon updated the issue page to indicate that it had identified the root cause and mitigated the underlying issue. The company says that it’s begun backfilling data in the Cost Management Console to correct billing numbers, and that all customers should see corrected amounts by Saturday, July 18 at noon pacific time.

Happened to me

By pulpo88 • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

I woke up this morning to an alert that my tiny static web site had incurred $3 million in S3 storage charges. Is that what “going viral” feels like? No thanks.

It was a good reminder to review what protections I have from liability should some script kiddie ddos me.

Trillion dollar estimates

By Tomahawk • Score: 3 Thread
We were showing at over $660tn. Lol.

That more than all the wealth in the entire world (~$450tn).

I guess Amazon are trying to outdo Elon....

And this is why …

By PPH • Score: 3 Thread

… I avoid automated fund transfers to make payments. No matter how much businesses beg. If there’s a human in the loop, there’s always the opportunity to look at an error like this and say “WTF?”

When the Y2K issues rolled around, a number of people asked me (based on my previous utility experience) whether the lights would stay on. My reply was: “The power company made it through the Year 1900 and not much has changed since then. Sure, you might get a bill for 100 years of consumption. But humans look at this stuff and nobody is going to hold you to that or cut your power.”

Unfortunately, humans are increasingly out of the loop.

Far from the worst error that could occur.

By fuzzyfuzzyfungus • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
Obviously billing errors are bad; but it seems like ones that off by an egregious number of powers of ten should concern us much less than ones that are small enough to be within the realm of plausible; those are the ones that you’ll need to fight over and quite possibly not even win if you are an edge case or dealing with one of the services/configurations where you don’t necessarily have any independent measure of usage. You can probably tell that you didn’t use a VM more than 720 hours in the last 30 days; but are you actually counting GET requests in some way that is both authoritative and cheaper than just paying the $0.0004/thousand rather than hoping that Amazon will charge you correctly? For some very buttoned up buckets that only your other stuff accesses, quite possibly you can infer from those systems; but if it’s something public facing and it might be a billing error or maybe you just got crawled hard last month?

Re: Happened to me

By 93 Escort Wagon • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Good thing you didn’t have auto-pay enabled…

Linus Torvalds To Critics of AI Coding On Linux: ‘Fork It. Or Just Walk Away.’

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Linus Torvalds says the Linux kernel will not ban AI-assisted coding tools, and if anti-AI absolutists have a problem with that, they can “fork it” or “walk away.” An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica:
Writing in a lengthy post on the Linux kernel mailing list this week, Torvalds said that “Linux is not one of those anti-AI projects, and if somebody has issues with that, they can do the open-source thing and fork it. Or just walk away.” The statement came amid a lengthy thread arguing about the use of Sashiko, an “agentic Linux kernel code review system” that its creators claim can, in tests, independently find 53.6 percent of the bugs that would end up being fixed by human coders in later commits. But the tool can also waste maintainers’ time by sending “false positive” reports of bugs that don’t exist, at a rate Sashiko’s maintainers estimate is “well within [the] 20% range.”

In discussing whether maintainers should be subjected to a flood of these kinds of automated, AI-powered bug report emails (true or false), one poster cited the Software Freedom Conservancy’s recent statement that the open source community “should support, not just tolerate, those who outright reject LLM-gen-AI systems” and that “every FOSS contributor deserves self-determination regarding LLM-gen-AI.” In the face of that statement, Torvalds said that he rejects those who demand that their open source projects not accept any LLM-generated code or revisions. “We’re not forcing anybody to use [LLM tools], but I will very loudly ignore people who try to argue against other people from using it,” Torvalds said.

Torvalds said his position on this is a pragmatic one that’s “based on technical merit. Not fear of new tools.” And when it comes to utility, Torvalds said that “AI is a tool, just like other tools we use. And it’s clearly a useful one. It may not have been that ‘clearly’ even just a year ago, but it’s no longer in question today. Anybody who doubts that clearly hasn’t actually used it.” […] While Torvalds acknowledged that “AI isn’t perfect,” he urged detractors to compare the output of these tools to the performance of human code maintainers. “Anybody who points to the problems at AI had better be looking in the mirror and pointing at themselves at the same time,” Torvalds wrote. “Because it’s not like natural intelligence is always all that great either.”

Linus is right, as usual

By ihadafivedigituid • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Linus has been right so many times on these process-related subjects that it seems stupid to argue with him. No single person on Earth has better credentials at this point.

He understands that ideologues only make technical endeavors worse, and he’s is correctly inviting people to prove him wrong.

Re:Pragmatic attitude works well on this.

By smooth wombat • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
I wouldn’t say pragmatic, no. He’s tried it, found it works, and now won’t listen to the people pointing out the numerous problems with it.

He has pointed out AI’s flaws and limitations. He has also said the beneft is it gets him to the starting point more quickly to either figure out a bug or how to do something, or even how to rewrite something he’s already done. He is not blindly accepting what it says.

Trust, but verify would be closer to his thinking.

Re:Pragmatic attitude works well on this.

By topologist • Score: 5, Informative Thread
The e-mail thread in question is about an LLM-based code reviewer (effectively a fancy static analyzer), and not LLM-generated code. I think the copyright concerns are significantly different between those two use cases. I tend to agree that new code contributed by an LLM is likely entangled with copyright concerns depending on the origins of the LLM’s training data sets; plus the hallucination and error risks are far less impactful if confined to code reviews and bugfinding. Also, at this point, I imagine an LLM trained exclusively on open source data sets could be quite capable.

Ted Tso, a senior linux contributor and maintainer, appears to agree; he noted on the thread that there are multiple use cases for LLMs and conflating all of them is not helpful.

Re: Pragmatic attitude works well on this.

By migos • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Dude if Linus wants to money grab he could’ve done that. He chose to work on open source instead. The one he loved. Not saying that he’s not an asshole at times but he’s not dissimilar to the craigslist guy or wikipedia guy. For the most part they didn’t sell out. Sure they made money but they could’ve made way more. They’re not Altman or Musk.

[Beep, beep, beep]

By PPH • Score: 5, Funny Thread

.. as the truck backs up.

“Hey buddy. We’ve got a load of pull requests. Where do you want them dumped?”

China Just Erased America’s AI Lead

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Longtime Slashdot reader schwit1 shares a report from Axios:
Kimi K3, a massive new model by Beijing-based Moonshot AI, threatens the foundations of Americas AI boom. Its release Thursday dazzled developers, jolted Silicon Valley and reset the AI race overnight. Kimi immediately vaulted into the top tier of global AI, beating Anthropic’s Fable 5 and OpenAI’s GPT-5.6 Sol in front-end coding tests by AI evaluator Arena.

In Arenas broader text ranking, Kimi finished ahead of Anthropics Opus 4.8 — the company’s flagship model until Fable 5 arrived in June — while costing 40% less. Unlike the premium U.S. models its challenging, Moonshot plans to release Kimi as an open-weight model on July 27 — allowing companies and governments to customize and run it on their own systems.

Kimi’s arrival suggests that cushion may have collapsed far faster than expected. “The entire game has changed. I expect this will trigger some code red for some,” AI analyst Kim Isenberg predicted. For companies, governments and developers, a model that performs near the frontier, costs 40% less and can be customized or run in-house may be the more attractive option. Its very existence puts pressure on the pricing power of U.S. labs, the enormous valuations built around their technological edge, and the case for spending hundreds of billions of dollars on ever-larger data centers.

Who has the most energy and engineers?

By shanen • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

(Did I smell a brain fart?)

Two significant advantages on the China side, though I think the title of the story is clickbait and it’s much too soon to see what is going on with AI.

The major advantage is the energy. But what do you do when the wind isn’t blowing or the sun isn’t shining? You just wait to train your AI because training can be done at your convenience. But I’m also sure that the Chinese are working on prioritization systems for the time-sensitive queries so that when Xi has a question he ALWAYS gets his answer ASAP. “That’s what Xi said!”

The minor advantage is the number of engineers. Even if you insist that only the most brilliant engineers matter, the larger the number of candidates the more likely you’re going to find some brilliant ones in there.

And one YUGE disadvantage on the American side. ‘Nuff said, but the YUGE disadvantage hasn’t stopped creating and empowering lesser disadvantages.

But at least the USA is the world leader in explosive diarrhea! (That was a joke. Really. In the explosive diarrhea race I’d bet on the former USAID recipient countries. (There must be another joke around here involving arms races versus other kinds of races to the… (Reminds me of my first joke about Texas: “Gawd oh gawd don’t flush it!”)))

Don’t worry

By Waffle Iron • Score: 5, Funny Thread

America will retake the lead in AI the same way we did with EVs: Just ban the ones from China. Problem solved.

Leapfrog

By Local ID10T • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

“The entire game has changed.”

No. It is still a game of leap-frog. Every time a company releases a new AI it is the greatest thing evar!1!! … and then somebody else one-ups them with an even more advanced one.

Same as it ever was.

Re:This is getting to be ridiculous

By WaffleMonster • Score: 5, Informative Thread

For those of us who aren’t fully up-to-date on local AI prerequisites, what kind of ram and computer requirements would running a model of this type require?

Would need a TB of RAM to run it effectively. Might be able to get away with a stupidly bit starved quant using as little as a half TB however would expect quality drop to be such you would be better off running a smaller model.

CPU inference isn’t a huge deal /w only 50B active parameters unless expecting instant responses. For Intel hardware I think most 4th gen or later Xeons /w AMX are able to max out memory bandwidth. Realistically if you have 1TB of ram you are going to have at least an 8 channel system which means at least 300GB/s bandwidth. So maybe a dozen tokens a second performance.

Might be able to squeeze more performance using speculative decoding. I have no clue by how much.

As far as I know there are no other realistic options. GPUs /w 1TB total VRAM fall well outside of my pay grade. Apple’s unified memory is popular for inference however as far as I know they don’t have a 1TB SKU so you would have to get two 512GB systems and split the model between them.

A few years ago you would be able to spend less than $10k for the hardware… I don’t even want to know what it costs today.

Re: This is a good thing

By kertaamo • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

No, usually invoking Godwin’s law is a loser because it’s so far detached from the topic under discussion. I think in the case of discussing the authoritarian, wannabe dictatorship that has gained power in the USA it is entirely appropriate. That’s how I see it as a Brit observer.

FBI Arrests Man Accused of Using Steam Games To Drain Victims’ Crypto Wallets

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
The FBI arrested a Florida man accused of uploading fake Steam games containing malware that stole passwords, data, and cryptocurrency wallet credentials from victims. Prosecutors say the scheme infected about 8,000 people, compromised roughly 80 crypto wallets, and stole at least $220,000 through games that appeared legitimate but secretly carried malware. TechCrunch reports:
On Tuesday, the FBI arrested Zyaire Wilkins, a 21-year-old Florida resident and student. On Wednesday, prosecutors accused him and a number of unnamed co-conspirators of hacking crimes. Over the past two years, Wilkins and his partners allegedly published several malware-laden video games on Steam, including BlockBlasters, Dashverse, Lampy, Lunara, and PirateFi. Using that malware, says the FBI, Wilkins and his accomplices infected around 8,000 victims, and then hacked around 80 cryptocurrency wallets to steal at least $220,000 worth of crypto. Wilkins and the others marketed their malicious video games on Discord, LinkedIn, and Telegram, according to the authorities.

[…] After the FBI identified another person involved in the crimes, according to the complaint, federal agents interviewed them. The unnamed person said they worked with other people to raise money to launch and market the malicious games in return for sharing some of the stolen cryptocurrency. The FBI identified a specific crypto account involved in the scheme, and then traced cryptocurrency payments made with that account to buy several gift cards, including for UberEats. After subpoenaing Uber, the feds were able to see that the gift cards were linked to an account that made deliveries to Wilkins, who went by the nickname Sibel.eth online, according to the complaint. The feds then got a search warrant for Wilkins’ residence, where they seized his MacBook laptop, cellphones, other devices, and digital wallets. According to the complaint, he refused to speak or answer any questions.

Caveat lessor

By Frank Burly • Score: 3 Thread
If this guy was smart enough to cobble together a game, he may also have been smart enough to include consent to the wholesale appropriation of your data in the software license agreement.

(I think this would make the charges more difficult to prove, but probably only enough to get him a better plea offer.)

Why are games not run in sandboxes?

By m00sh • Score: 3 Thread

Why doesn’t Steam or Windows run video games in their own sandbox?

Even Linux with proton does that or can do that.

Flatpak/snap has its issues with sandboxing but video games don’t need to access external files.

Does it have to do with DRM?

What is the reason?

Crypto wallet keys how stored?

By m00sh • Score: 3 Thread

How are people storing the keys to their crypto wallet?

How are people with $200k in their crypto not buying a hardware wallet? Or were they coinbase logins?

Re:Crypto wallet keys how stored?

By sarren1901 • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Furthermore, why wouldn’t you protect your stuff with MFA? Does coinbase not offer that? I’d likely not want to deal with any financial company that can’t be bothered to have some kind of MFA.

Crypto is a bad joke anyway. Scammers robbing scammers.

Meta In Talks To Lease Computing Power To Anthropic In Potential $10 Billion Deal

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Anthropic is reportedly in very early talks to lease computing power from Meta in a potential deal worth around $10 billion. The discussions follow Anthropic’s recent compute deal with SpaceX and come as Meta explores selling excess AI capacity as part of a broader push to turn its massive infrastructure spending into a cloud business. CNBC reports:
Access to enough AI chips remains a challenge for firms like Anthropic, which places usage limits on its most advanced models like Fable. […] Meta could spend as much as $145 billion on capital expenditures, including for AI infrastructure, in 2026. Last October, Zuckerberg said that companies are regularly “asking if we have compute that they could buy from us at some premium to what we’ve bought it at.”

Bubble popping

By thecombatwombat • Score: 5, Informative Thread

A lot of people, most loudly Ed Zitron have suggested for a while if this happens it should be taken as the sign the bubble is popping.

Not only is the supposed insatiable demand story not true, but the only buyers are Anthropic and OpenAI.

Apple Sends Legal Letters To Dozens of OpenAI Employees

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot
An anonymous reader quotes a report from MacRumors:
Apple has reportedly sent legal letters to dozens of former Apple employees now working at OpenAI, telling them to preserve potentially relevant documents and communications as it continues to pursue its trade secret lawsuit against the AI company. The Financial Times (paywalled) reports that Apple has targeted around 40 former employees with legal preservation letters, acting on its belief that the alleged misappropriation of confidential information may extend beyond the individuals named in its original complaint.

The development follows Apple’s lawsuit filed last week against OpenAI, in which the company alleges a coordinated effort to obtain confidential information relating to its hardware engineering and product development. Apple claims OpenAI recruited key engineers, including former Apple executives Tang Tan and Chang Liu, and benefited from proprietary designs, manufacturing processes, and other trade secrets. Tan is OpenAI’s Chief Hardware Officer and a 24-year Apple veteran who led product design, while Liu is on the hardware team at OpenAI after working as a senior system electrical engineer at Apple.