Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Fedora Linux 43 Exposes 20-Year-Old Microsoft Outlook Security Failure
  2. EU Plots To Abandon US Tech
  3. MacBook Neo is So Popular That Apple Reportedly Doubled Production
  4. Google Launches ‘Gemma 4 12B’ AI Model That Can Run On Your Laptop
  5. Google Shares Fitbit Air Blueprints So Anyone Can 3D-Print Accessories
  6. Microsoft Plans Linux Tools, RTX Spark Desktop For Windows Devs
  7. Meta Workers Can Opt Out of Workplace Tracking for Up to 30 Minutes
  8. Microsoft Claims New Quantum Chip 1,000 Times Better Than Before
  9. Android Gets Fake Call Detection That Uses RCS
  10. Thanks To Robots, Ukraine Is Now Talking About Winning, Not Just Surviving
  11. Trump Administration to Dismantle Ocean Monitoring System
  12. Microsoft’s Project Solara Is an OS For Devices That Run AI Agents Instead of Apps
  13. Mathematicians Warn of AI Threats to Profession As Industry Encroaches
  14. European Parliament Ditches Google For French Search Firm
  15. Russian Spy Agency Says Foreign Spies Turned Officials’ Smartphones Into Surveillance Devices

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Fedora Linux 43 Exposes 20-Year-Old Microsoft Outlook Security Failure

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
BrianFagioli writes:
Fedora Linux 43 users upgrading to the latest Dovecot mail server discovered something rather unsettling: some older Microsoft Outlook configurations may have been silently ignoring SSL/TLS settings for POP3 email connections for years. According to a Fedora community blog post, affected Outlook clients reportedly continued using insecure port 110 connections even when encryption was enabled in the application settings. The issue surfaced after Dovecot 2.4 disabled plaintext authentication on non secure connections by default, causing Outlook users to suddenly lose mailbox access after the Fedora 43 upgrade.

The report suggests the behavior may date back as far as Outlook 2007, although modern Outlook builds were not fully tested. Fedora admins stress that the problem could be limited to legacy account configurations rather than current versions of Outlook itself. Still, the discovery has sparked discussion among Linux admins and security folks because many users likely assumed their email traffic was encrypted simply because Outlook claimed SSL/TLS was enabled. The incident also highlights how stricter defaults in modern open source infrastructure can expose ancient assumptions and questionable behaviors that quietly survived for decades.

EU Plots To Abandon US Tech

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Ancient Slashdot reader whitroth shares a report from Politico, with the caption: "shutting down Microsoft Office for the International Criminal Court (ICC) was clearly a wake-up call.” From the report:
The EU is moving to counter American dominance in technology by reaching for one of the oldest tools in its arsenal: industrial strategy. As the European Commission unveiled a plan Wednesday to reduce Europe’s reliance on the foreign technology providers that underpin the modern economy, it was careful to stress that it was not picking a fight with U.S. digital giants. Instead, the tech sovereignty package — motivated in no small part by U.S. President Donald Trump’s weaponization of Europe’s dependence on American firms — takes a longer-term view: boost the continent’s players so they can eventually challenge their U.S. rivals.

[…] If adopted, the package will direct public money toward products that contribute to Europe’s economy and independence from foreign firms; cut red tape for data centers; beef up research and innovation through “leadership initiatives”; incentivize countries to share digital capacities in a new “Eurocloud” forum; and require EU governments to come up with national strategies to boost the adoption of cutting-edge tech, including AI. The package will also seek to ramp up the bloc’s demand for advanced chips — a response to criticism by the industry — with a series of industrial initiatives to revise a 2023 chips law.

[…] As part of its proposal to keep a list of trustworthy countries, the Commission would require EU governments to run a so-called “sovereignty risk assessment” for every digital service they rely on, measuring foreign control, potential access to sensitive data and the risk of operational disruption. Within a year, they would have to determine the appropriate level of protection for each public sector and procure digital services accordingly — unless they can prove doing so would come at a “disproportionate cost,” the proposal reads. However, the Commission reserves the right to overrule their assessment in future legislation if it believes they downplayed the risks. The Commission estimated that just one percent of Europe’s public services are so sensitive that they would be required under the proposed certification scheme to rely on the strict level that totally excludes foreign technology.
“We cannot afford to depend on others for the technologies that keep our hospitals running, our energy grids stable and our services secure,” Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said in a statement. “This is about protecting our citizens, defending our interests and making our own choices.”

EU will not Deregulate To Accomplish This

By SmaryJerry • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Dumping Microsoft has some pain points but is doable with some work. However actually competing with Microsoft and other tech companies in software and AI is an entirely different matter. The EU has already massively regulated software environment through GDPR, DSA, CRA, the AI Act, and more. EU companies face so many hurdles around compliance that’s its basically impossible to create a startup without backing by billionaires - many of whom have publicly stated they would never start a software company in the EU for these reasons. Now also take into account that AI also requires power generation, and the regulatory hurdles go from basically impossible to ‘only attempt this if you love pain.’

Okay then, that was always allowed

By XopherMV • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Europe always had the capability and opportunity to create European alternatives to US technology. There was never anything stopping them from going that route at any time. In fact, I welcome this work as an American. As a consumer of technology, I’d love to see some alternatives to the US technologies I currently use. Why Europe is approaching this as some flex on the US seems a bit ridiculous to me. This was always allowed.

Re:Tech sovereignty is a survival need. Good on ‘e

By rsilvergun • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
So this isn’t about tech sovereignty per se this is because America has gone so far off the rails that we can no longer be trusted.

You will note that Europe isn’t busy doing the same thing with Chinese electronics and software. That’s because as brutal a regime as China is they are at least predictable. As long as the money flows they’re not going to do anything too crazy.

In the era of a second term of trump that is no longer true for america. All bets are off and God only knows what’s going to happen.

I don’t think people really can process just how crazy it is that the president of the United States threatened to seize Greenland by force and that the only reason he stopped is that Congress told him no. And to be clear not all of Congress just enough of it that he had to listen on that one issue…

At a certain point crazy is so fucking crazy that while intellectually you know it’s there emotionally you can’t really process it. It’s what I call the Dick Cheney effect.

Re:EU will not Deregulate To Accomplish This

By thegarbz • Score: 5, Informative Thread

The EU has already massively regulated software environment through GDPR, DSA, CRA, the AI Act, and more.

Literally all companies currently operating in the EU, including US tech giants are required to comply with these too. There is this fantasy that regulation alone prevents alternative players in the EU when in reality the “persecution” of US tech companies (as the US government would tell the story) is nothing more than actually demonstrating there’s a level playing field.

EU companies face so many hurdles around compliance that’s its basically impossible to create a startup without backing by billionaires

The EU has literally countless software companies including startups. One of the major players in AI is French. Heck the *original* AI company (now owned by Google) was UK based - back when they were under the full EU regulations. The problem isn’t startups, the problem is getting US companies to fuck off and stop destroying competition through acquisition (e.g. Kyndryl is the world’s largest data services provider with double digit billions in the bank. Why don’t they build their own datacentre in the Netherlands instead of attempting to purchase Solvinity?)

many of whom have publicly stated they would never start a software company in the EU for these reasons

Yes billionaires prefer to invest is regulatory markets that allow the fucking over of the population and the development of wholesale monopolies. My friend, you can keep your billionaires. Don’t want them.

Re:EU will not Deregulate To Accomplish This

By dunkelfalke • Score: 5, Informative Thread

I used to work for a small German software company for 11 years. That company used to be a world leader in its specific niche. Only left after the company has been acquired by an American company which turned everything to shit.
EU regulations can be a pain in the arse sometimes, but they aren’t the problem. American businesses having easy access to stupid money that they use to get rid of European competitor is the problem.

MacBook Neo is So Popular That Apple Reportedly Doubled Production

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
According to supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo, Apple has reportedly doubled 2026 MacBook Neo production from 5 million to 10 million units after stronger-than-expected demand for its $599 budget laptop. MacRumors reports:
On an earnings call in late April, Apple’s CEO Tim Cook said that customer response to the MacBook Neo was “off the charts,” and the popularity of the laptop has reportedly led the company to significantly boost production. […] Apple was very optimistic about the MacBook Neo before announcing it, but the company still “undercalled” the level of enthusiasm that the laptop would generate, according to Cook. He said that MacBook Neo demand exceeded Apple’s expectations and helped to drive a record number of first-time Mac buyers last quarter.

New figures from market research firm IDC support Apple’s claim that the MacBook Neo is selling well, and the Windows PC industry has taken notice. For example, Dell recently introduced a redesigned XPS 13 laptop from $699 and said it has features “you won’t find on a MacBook Neo,” such as a touch screen and a backlit keyboard. “Apple’s MacBook Neo is a capable machine, and its arrival confirms that there’s real appetite for premium quality at accessible prices,” admitted Dell.

Purchased one for non-tech family

By sinij • Score: 3, Interesting Thread
It is surprisingly solid both in quality and performance. Also, when comparing to windows it runs much better than what I expected out of hardware specs. Last but not least, Apple had no issues with me never creating accounts and doing everything locally.

Eh, is the Dell comparable?

By Guspaz • Score: 3 Thread

Build quality on the Dell is good, but from hands-ons, not *as* good. Touchscreen is not something most people want on a laptop, I think (I know a niche loves them, but most people don’t), but it’s 120 Hz, which is a major advantage over the Neo (and Air for that matter). The touchpad is not as good. The CPU is much slower (at least in bursty tasks). I’ll speculate that speakers and battery life are much worse. Connectivity is a wash (faster second USB port, but no headphone jack). The backlit keyboard is nice. The entry price point is $100 higher. Worst of all, it comes with Windows 11.

Of course this is just based on specsheets, very brief hands-on previews, and speculation, we’ll need to see what real reviews show.

Re:Weird. But good for stockholders.

By ArchieBunker • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Underpowered is relative. For most people the specs of the entry level model are just fine. If you’re building Firefox from source every day then no this model isn’t for you. I dumped my old 6 core Xeon box for a M4 mini and it’s great for all my tasks.

Seems obvious

By codemachine • Score: 3 Thread

"… confirms that there’s real appetite for premium quality at accessible prices”

Gee, who would’ve thought? Did Dell really need Apple to release a laptop to figure out that little nugget of information?

Google Launches ‘Gemma 4 12B’ AI Model That Can Run On Your Laptop

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Google has launched Gemma 4 12B, a 12-billion-parameter open AI model designed to run locally on your laptop without depending entirely on cloud infrastructure. WION reports:
According to Google, the new model delivers performance close to much larger AI systems while requiring significantly less memory. The company says Gemma 4 12B can run locally on devices equipped with just 16GB of VRAM, making advanced AI more accessible to developers, researchers and businesses. The launch highlights a growing trend across the AI industry: bringing powerful AI models directly to personal computers instead of relying solely on remote data centers.

Gemma is Google’s family of open AI models built using technology and research from its Gemini program. The new Gemma 4 12B model contains 12 billion parameters and has been designed to handle multiple types of information, including text, images and audio. Unlike traditional AI systems that focus only on text, Gemma 4 12B can understand visual content, process audio inputs and perform advanced reasoning tasks. This makes it suitable for a wider range of applications, from software development and content creation to research and automation. Google says the model is available under the Apache 2.0 licence, allowing developers and organizations to use, modify and deploy it with relatively few restrictions.

[…] One of the most significant technical changes in Gemma 4 12B is its new unified architecture. Traditionally, multimodal AI systems use separate components known as encoders to process images, audio and text before combining the information. Google says Gemma 4 12B removes the need for separate multimodal encoders. Instead, the model processes different types of information through a unified architecture. According to the company, this helps improve efficiency while reducing memory requirements and computational overhead. The result is a model that can deliver advanced multimodal capabilities while remaining small enough to run locally on modern hardware.

“It can run on your laptop” is not the news

By allo • Score: 3 Thread

If you like 12B models, there is Mistral-Nemo since 2 years.

If you are more VRAM constrained, there was Llama 3 8B. There is now Qwen3.5 9B. Gemma 4 already had E4B and E2B for devices like your smartphone. Ministral 3 also has 3B, 8B, 14B variants. There is more than enough choice for small models. And with offloading some layers to CPU RAM you can even run larger ones.

The interesting part of this model is that it is multi-modal (it supports image and audio input) without an encoder. That’s new to the Gemma architecture.

Google Shares Fitbit Air Blueprints So Anyone Can 3D-Print Accessories

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Google has released (PDF) technical specs and 2D CAD drawings for the Fitbit Air to encourage users to make their own accessories. “These CAD drawings include crucial mating dimensions, tolerances, and mating force specifications — including attach and detach force — to help you build a high-quality accessory band,” Google says on a store page listing. 9to5Google reports:
Noting how the “community has already come up with innovative and creative new ideas to make the Fitbit Air [their] own” since launch last month, Google is “officially releasing the hardware specifications and accessory design guidelines for the Fitbit Air tracker to the public.” For example, owners have already found their own bicep band solutions. This information would typically just be available for third-party accessory companies, but Google wants to open things up to “independent designers and artisan makers.”
The Google Store page also lists other things developers should keep in mind, such as sensor clearance, sensor pressure, secure retention, and skin-friendly materials.

Microsoft Plans Linux Tools, RTX Spark Desktop For Windows Devs

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica:
Microsoft’s Build developer conference kicked off today, and as with almost everything the company has done in the last few years, Microsoft’s opening keynote focused overwhelmingly on AI and other closely related technologies. […] On the hardware front, we didn’t get any updates for existing Surface devices (not counting yesterday’s Surface Laptop Ultra announcement), but we did get something new: the Surface RTX Spark Dev Box is “a compact developer PC” built around Nvidia’s new RTX Spark chip with up to 128GB of built-in memory. The Dev Box looks a little like a cartoon anvil or piano fell onto an Xbox Series X and flattened it. Its aluminum casing was designed “to double as a heatsink,” and its preloaded version of Windows 11 Pro will include a “purposeful” set of developer-centric default settings and preinstalled tools.

This is a follow-up of sorts to the Windows Dev Kit 2023, also known as “Project Volterra.” This Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3-powered PC was essentially the system board from a Surface Pro tablet stuffed into a plastic box, and it was introduced alongside Arm-native versions of several Microsoft developer tools. It helped to set the stage for the Arm-based flagship Surface devices that launched the next year, which benefitted from a better and faster x86-to-Arm code translation technology called Prism and a greater number of Arm-native third-party apps that didn’t need to be translated in the first place. Microsoft didn’t announce pricing or specific specs for the RTX Spark Dev Box, but you can probably expect it to cost quite a bit more than the $600 that Project Volterra did. Hopefully, Microsoft can keep the price at least somewhat lower than the $4,699 asking price for Nvidia’s similarly specced DGX Spark box.

On the software side, several developer-centric changes are coming to Windows 11, particularly for users of the Windows Subsystem for Linux (WSL). Microsoft is introducing a Windows-native version of the coreutils command line tools, so that commands or scripts made for Linux work within Windows and the other way around; the ability to run WSL inside of containers, said to be arriving in “the coming months”; and something called Windows Developer Configurations that uses the WinGet tool to quickly set up “a distraction-free dev environment with VS Code, GitHub Copilot, WSL, PowerShell 7 and developer-optimized settings with one command on any Windows 11 device.”
Microsoft also introduced Microsoft Execution Containers (MXC), as “enterprise-grade sandboxed environments” that let AI agents like OpenClaw operate on Windows without getting unrestricted access to the whole system. In theory, MXC could let organizations enforce agent-specific limits, such as blocking access to personal accounts, separating work and personal data, or requiring permission before deleting files.
The MXC GitHub repo also notes support for “multiple containment backends,” meaning the same sandboxing concept could apply beyond AI agents to other plugins, tools, and workloads.

Further reading: Microsoft Unveils Scout, an Autonomous AI Agent Built On OpenClaw

Could you…?

By cayenne8 • Score: 3 Thread
Could you install Linux on this new box?

Meta Workers Can Opt Out of Workplace Tracking for Up to 30 Minutes

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Meta is scaling back parts of its employee tracking initiative after staff objected to software that collected mouse movements, clicks, keystrokes, and other actions for AI training data. According to Reuters, the company will now let workers pause collection for up to 30 minutes and request exemptions. Reuters reports:
[Stephane Kasriel, a vice president in Meta’s AI model-building Superintelligence Labs unit] said the team behind the software had also introduced “several optimizations” to reduce its impact on computer battery life, after employees complained it was consuming so much data it was causing their home internet usage to spike. “While we remain confident in the privacy protections we put in place at launch, which went through several layers of risk review, we have heard your concerns about personal data on work devices, battery life, and wanting more control over when capturing happens,” Kasriel said in the memo.

They can opt out for longer than that

By DrMrLordX • Score: 3 Thread

by working someplace else.

concerns about personal data on work devices

By blahbooboo • Score: 3 Thread
If someone who works for a company, especially Meta, is doing anything personal on their work owned equipment they’re complete morons.

Heck, id be concerned even allowing a Meta corporate laptop on my home network at all (even if its split to a separate subnet)

And if you do this…

By Yo,dog! • Score: 3 Thread
you’re FIRED!

I read this part before, I think

By Zak3056 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

As O’Brien passed the telescreen a thought seemed to strike him. He stopped, turned aside and pressed a switch on the wall. There was a sharp snap. The voice had stopped.

Julia uttered a tiny sound, a sort of squeak of surprise. Even in the midst of his panic, Winston was too much taken aback to be able to hold his tongue.

‘You can turn it off!’ he said.

‘Yes,’ said O’Brien, ‘we can turn it off. We have that privilege.’

That’s about enough time …

By PPH • Score: 3 Thread

.. for me to log onto the DoJ server and file my daily undercover surveillance report.

Microsoft Claims New Quantum Chip 1,000 Times Better Than Before

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Microsoft says its new Majorana 2 quantum chip is 1,000 times more reliable than its predecessor, with qubits lasting about 20 seconds instead of milliseconds, and claims it could have a commercially useful quantum machine by 2029. The BBC reports:
“We will have a quantum machine in 2029 that can solve commercially viable, reasonable problems,” said Zulfi Alam, corporate vice president of Microsoft Quantum. That would still require huge further advances as such a device would require millions of qubits - the current chip, Alam said, has 12. Assessing the firm’s claims are difficult because it does not release the full details of what it has discovered publicly, citing commercial confidentiality.

Microsoft has spent 20 years pursuing an approach to quantum computing known as “topological.” The firm’s approach to this is based on exploiting the properties of a so-called quasi-particle, which had existed only in theory, since it was first predicted in the 1930s by Italian physicist Ettore Majorana. To do this it had to exploit a novel state of matter - different from the three familiar states of liquid, solid or gas.

Paul Stevenson, a physics professor at the University of Surrey, said the tech giant’s timeline sounded plausible - if its research lived up to its claims. “Microsoft appears to have made a leap in their attempt to produce viable topological qubits,” he said. “If they succeed, they will leap from being a player with no production quantum computer, to being a serious player in the race to make the next generation of fault-tolerant machines.”

When you scale this…

By zurkeyon • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Across time and stack it with tech light LightMatter, the Resurgence of Memristor technology, and the recent discoveries with germanium and other materials, you can begin to see the integrated systems of the nexxt 5-10 years coming together. Real question is… Who writes the “OS” for such a construct? Are “We” even capable of doing it ourselves? Interesting times.

“By 2029…” This sounds familiar…

By SCVonSteroids • Score: 3 Thread

I feel like there’s this other technology that’s just been a few years away for the last 50+ years… Any day now…

No, It Won’t.

By sudonim2 • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

No company will release a commercial quantum computer by 2029. No company is ever going to release a commercial quantum computer of any kind. If there is any actual utility to quantum computers beneath the hype, it will be a niche matter at best.

Anyone who wants to disagree with me can do so by betting against me in Kalshi. I will gladly take your money. If you are unwilling to put your money where oyur mouth is, I’m just going to ignore you.

MS claims discovery of new particle?

By Tablizer • Score: 5, Funny Thread

…the Higgs BSOD

Android Gets Fake Call Detection That Uses RCS

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from 9to5Google:
Phone by Google wants to combat the “growing threat of impersonation scams” and protect Android users against “sophisticated, AI-powered deepfake attacks" with fake call detection. […] Fake call detection requires that both parties are on Android and use the Phone by Google app, while Google Messages and Google Contacts also have to be installed. When a contact calls, their phone “sends a silent confirmation signal in real time to your device to verify the call is legitimate and truly coming from the contact’s device.”

This digital handshake uses end-to-end encrypted RCS (Rich Communication Services). If you’re being scammed by an impersonator, your phone will notice that the “initial confirmation signal will be missing,” and ping the contact’s real device to double-check. If their real device says, “I’m not making a call right now,” you’ll get a warning on your screen advising you to hang up immediately. This feature will be available globally on Android 12+ phones starting with Pixel devices this month. Fake call detection is enabled by default but can be turned off at any time. Google says it’s “possible for other apps and device manufacturers to adopt this technology” given the RCS underpinnings.
You can learn more about fake call detection in Google’s blog post.

You are protected

By TwistedGreen • Score: 5, Funny Thread

This is great! The more Google knows about me, the more they can protect me. I will feel so much safer once this rolls out.

Duress Words and other Defense Mechanisms.

By geekmux • Score: 3 Thread

In the rapidly growing era of AI-driven attacks against humans abusing the more traditional forms of urgent communication (voice, video, etc.), it becomes quite important for us meatsacks to remember the value of duress words. Which you should coordinate with you fellow loved ones in person. Using hand-written paper and/or a whisper-level voice to document and share.

Ensure everyone is well aware of growing scams by agreeing to call or contact each other at minimum specific intervals. Consider a collective agreement in which no financial decision above a certain threshold is decided without others being involved or made aware. Ensure all involved can be fully trusted to understand why these protections are becoming necessary.

Re:Easier fix…

By arglebargle_xiv • Score: 4, Funny Thread
Well in my case they have to send me a fax to make an appointment to call me on my cellphone. This has been effective in stopping 100% of scam calls.

Thanks To Robots, Ukraine Is Now Talking About Winning, Not Just Surviving

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
fjo3 shares a report from Defense One:
A small but growing number of European officials and analysts are saying what four years ago was unthinkable: Ukraine isn’t just surviving its grueling war with Russia, it is in some ways thriving and may even be on a path to victory. This isn’t yet captured in headlines — for example, about last weekend’s barrage of Russian drones and missiles around Ukraine — but in the details, like how some 90 percent were intercepted. Several long-term trends have shifted in Ukraine’s favor, and the core reason is its fierce focus on AI and robotics.

In the crucible of war, Ukraine has developed drones and ground robots that can hold territory — even take it back. Some are fully controlled by humans, like supply robots and medical-evacuation vehicles. But an increasing number are controlled in at least some aspects by dozens of AI products, from guidance packages on aerial drones to decision aids at the highest levels. […] Just as important as the tech are the new tactics. Given unusual latitude to experiment, Ukrainian fighters began to develop robot-forward infantry concepts, like combined-arms attacks by airborne and ground systems, “more than a year ago. Right now, we’re massively starting to implement this,” said Davyd Aloian, deputy secretary of the National Security and Defence Council of Ukraine, the coordinating body on domestic and international security, in an interview.

Ukraine and its partners are also steaming ahead on new concepts for highly autonomous defenses against Russian drones, combining ISR sensors and AI to detect and identify enemy drones in less time and with more certainty. “All of the systems are being linked with each other and with people” to create a distributed network with interceptor drones at various locations to be activated when needed, Aloian said. “One day we will have only like 10 guys who are just going to be responsible for approving interception. And it will automatically go direct to the target.” The human operators will be dispersed as well. “Everything can be controlled from Kyiv, Lviv, from cities in other countries,” he said.
“It’s not what happened to Ukraine” (referencing Russia’s barrage of Shahed drones) that “should scare us in Europe,” said Swarmer CEO Serhii Kupriienko. It’s how quickly Ukraine’s “middling” military evolved to counter Russia’s invasion.

“We are behind by literally 10 years or 20 years” in some defense-technology areas, such as satellite imagery, Kupriienko said, and yet his country has climbed a capability curve that just two years ago seemed insurmountable. So could others, he said. “The answer is always AI solutions and integrating the AI into even the daily routine work within the bureaucracy,” he said.

“We have evolved since 2022, the industry has and our defense has as well. Right now we are able to provide not only [large quantities of drone] assets but everything what is needed to build out the ecosystem,” including parts and production, training, modification, etc. Aloian said.

Re:Insert Neocon war propaganda

By JaredOfEuropa • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Western media hardly report on any individual strike. What we can find about the strike on May 22nd: Russia claims the dormitory was used as a dormitory. Ukraine claims the place was used as an HQ for Rubicon (the Russian elite drone unit). No one has been able to confirm or debunk either claim.

So: 1) Russia is lying about what went on in that building, 2) Ukraine acted on incorrect intel, 3) Ukraine accidentally hit the wrong building, or 4) Ukraine deliberately targeted a student dorm.
1 and 2 are plausible. 3 not so much: their strikes are generally precise, and Russia allegedly had no jammers or air defense assets in the area that could have caused drones to go off-course (as does sometimes happen in other strikes elsewhere). 4 is implausible; Ukraine has not much of a history of deliberately targeting civilian homes.

Re:To be clear

By phantomfive • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Nice comment. We now know that Biden didn’t want to win the war, because he was afraid of nukes.

In modern war, the side with air superiority wins the war. The side with air superiority has weapons that can attack but can’t be attacked back: that’s too huge an advantage. The entire reason that Ukraine didn’t fall in three months is because somehow Russia failed to establish air superiority. Ukraine managed to shoot airplanes out of the sky if they got too close. So it’s a situation where neither side has superiority: a stalemate. Ukraine is building up their airforce. When they’ve built it up enough to establish air superiority, they will win the war. European industrial production is powerful.

Drones are a challenge for Russia. As you cleverly called them, Wunderwaffen have come up from time to time in the conflict, from HIMARS to Baryaktar. They’ve presented challenges to the Russian military, but so far the Russian military has found a solution every time. Russia has presented problems to Ukraine as well, such as motorcycles and glide bombs. Ukraine has found an answer for them as well.

Currently drones have halted or maybe reversed the Russian advance. Russia is working on a solution, and we will see if they overcome this challenge. If they can’t it will be an embarrassing loss, much like Finland.

The real question will be if Russia can stop Ukraine’s growing airforce. Currently Russia is losing anti-air systems faster than they can be replaced. Russia doesn’t have the technology to match NATO air weapons, so the answer is no. But it might take until 2030.

Re:The key is China

By Koreantoast • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
China is actually in a dilemma with Russia. On one hand, they want the Russian regime to survive only because it provides a political counterbalance to the EU in Europe. However, they are frustrated with the Russians constantly expanding the war and threatening to attack other nations because they don’t want the Russians to provoke NATO rearmament and remilitarization. So they are trying to calibrate to keep the Russians alive while making sure they don’t give them so much that they’ll start another war.

Re:False optimism - no permanent tech advantages

By nealric • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

This analysis is simply wrong because Ukraine is not using humans as a resource as Russia is. Ukraine can send fewer and fewer soldiers to the front lines as long as they can prevent Russians from getting there in the first place. This is no longer a front like WWI with a large number of soldiers sitting in a manned trench looking out against a “no-man’s land.” Instead, we have a very wide grey zone of ~20km (and growing in many places) where drones hunt anything that moves. Only a small number of soldiers from either side actually sit at or even near the point of contact. Russia’s only ability to advance has been sending large numbers of soldiers into the grey zone and hoping enough survive to consolidate control. If drones can mop up all of them, then the advance goes nowhere. If they can’t get large numbers to the front, they can’t advance at all. That’s exactly what the current supply line denial campaign is about. It doesn’t take many Ukrainian soldiers to do it.

The problem with “just cut a deal” is that the deal Russia has insisted on requires Ukraine giving up the most fortified areas of the front, which would leave the entire country exposed if Russia breached it. If they could be 100% sure that giving up the Donbas would result in a lasting peace with Russia letting them be, then I bet they would take it. But there is no way to do that.

Another mistake that many Western observers make is thinking that Russia will seek an exit if they can just “save face.” Puttin doesn’t care about “face” because this is existential for him. The economy will collapse if the war is shut down. War spending is now into double digits of the GDP. He’s in his 70s. This war is his last chance to realize his life dream of reuniting the USSR and becoming “Vlad the Great.” He can’t just accept a fig leaf agreement and let it go because that’s the end of that dream and likely his rule. Even the offer of “just give up the Donbas” probably isn’t real. If Ukraine said “yes”, they’d ask for more because they can’t actually accept a real peace.

Re:To be clear

By korgitser • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Agreed with most of it.

For a nitpick, but also tied to the narrative issues I talked about. The problem I find with the usual take on e.g. shells production, also found in the article you linked, is that while the EU producing shells for Ukraine is obviously good news for Ukraine, somehow North Korea producing shells for Russia is supposed to be bad news for Russia.

The reality is that Ukraine has their allies, and Russia has theirs, and both are good news for their respective war efforts.

And this kind of a thing is everywhere in war reporting. Everything about our side is good for us, everything about their side is bad for them, and nothing is looked into too deeply. My personal favourite - brave and cunning Ukrainians are using the railroads for great success; the reliance on railroad by the dumb and backwards Russians is holding back their war effort. We somehow need to blind ourselves, and hype ourselves up about what’s going on, to keep high morale or whatnot, and in the process, we give up our ability to make honest and accurate assessments about the situation. That Ukraine was severely lacking in shells was known a long time ago to anybody who cared to know, but it took years for Rheinmetall get going. US never increased production, but they did increase prices to eat up all available funding. Had the people known about this on a widespread level, would we have demanded results? Would our governments and industry have delivered? The more cynical among us might find that reality is withheld from the us exactly because our governments don’t want to do anything about it. But reality will come back to bite those who deny it, and will demand back what you owe it with harsh interest.

And we need to talk about the elephant in the room, China. The article claims European shell production might rival China, yet does not quote what Chinese production is. And that’s because there’s basically no known numbers to quote. But China did install 500k/year production capacity in Belarus last year, and they didn’t break a sweat. The idea that Europe might match Chinese production on /anything/ is veering on the edge of absurd to me. Especially so because the CCP can just say that we now do this, and it will have happened, while in the EU there will be years of going through the motions before there’s even any hope of something happening. In our war math we need to consider that China probably cannot afford to have Russia lose, so they will probably not allow Russia to lose, and it will probably not be too much of an effort for them. This also goes for the Ukrainian jets, and drones, and whatnot. If the Russians can not meet the challenge in some field, the Chinese will step up and match the game. Last, but not least, China recently came to market with dirt cheap, $99k hypersonic missiles, while the West basically lacks the rare earths for any missile production at all. Yeah, not good.

It is obvious to me that good information is necessary for good decisions. It’s already bad that the public is widely mis- and underinformed, and fed prepackaged raw emotion and hate minutes instead. But more and more does our leadership also seem to drink their own Kool-Aid. This is not the path to success, but our leadership does not care either. The shit they throw in the fan will not be theirs to clean up.

Trump Administration to Dismantle Ocean Monitoring System

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
The Trump administration is moving to dismantle the National Science Foundation’s $368 million Ocean Observatories Initiative, a network of more than 900 deep-sea instruments used to monitor ocean currents, marine ecosystems, carbon absorption, heat waves, fisheries, coastal flooding, and climate change. The NSF said it would send ships in June to begin the removal of the instruments anchored off Oregon, Washington, Alaska, North Carolina, and an area between Greenland and Iceland known as the Irminger Sea. The New York Times reports:
The ocean observation system began operating in 2016 and was expected to continue for 25 years. Jim Edson, a marine meteorologist who led the Ocean Observatories Initiative, called it “the world’s most advanced continuously operating ocean observing systems.” When it was first proposed, the science foundation said it was important to have a long-term presence at scientifically important sites in the Atlantic and Pacific oceans. Removing the instruments could take 15 months. Seismic instruments positioned around an active underwater volcano off Oregon will continue operating until 2028.

Each observation station consists of several moorings that secure long arrays of devices connected to wires. The devices measure ocean currents as well as chemical and biological conditions from the water’s surface down thousands of feet. The instruments were hardened to resist the pressure of the deep ocean, corrosive seawater as well as marine plants and animals that can foul electronics. Remotely controlled robotic vehicles and gliders around the moorings collect and transmit data to research laboratories.

It cost $48 million annually to operate the network. The Trump administration repeatedly tried to shutter it, proposing to cut its funding by 80 percent in both 2025 and again in 2026. Congress pushed back, restoring the money. To try to reduce costs, managers turned off some of the instruments and collected less data, according to a December 2025 presentation about the observatories at the annual meeting of the American Geophysical Union, a nonprofit organization of scientists. Still, the science foundation moved ahead to decommission the observatory network.

Re: D.o.g.e.

By fortfive • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Operating a single f35 for a year takes more money than this entire project so far. There is lots of waste in govt to be sure. But if it’s even halfway competent, basic science ain’t it. Regardless of what conclusions might be made based on the observations, collecting more data like this is rarely bad.

Re:D.o.g.e.

By shilly • Score: 5, Informative Thread

These aren’t clever questions. They’re idiotic questions that you think are clever, because you’re an idiot.

Literally hundreds of scientific papers have been published using data from the OOI, including:
“Marine Heatwaves Suppress Ocean Circulation and Large Vortices in the Gulf of Alaska (2024)”, Communications Earth & Environment. The authors used longitudinal observations from the OOI Gulf of Alaska array to evaluate how marine heatwaves affect large ocean eddies and circulation patterns. They found that extreme warming events can weaken major vortices that are important for marine productivity and ecosystem structure. This required continuous multi-year measurements, and matters because marine heatwaves are becoming more common, and now we know these cause changes in ocean dynamics, nogt just temperature.
2. . Gridded High-Resolution OOI Profiler Data from the Washington Continental Slope, 2014–2025 (2025), Data in Brief. The authors produced a decade-long, high-resolution data product from one of the OOI Coastal Endurance profilers off the U.S. Pacific Northwest. The dataset includes temperature, salinity, oxygen, chlorophyll fluorescence, currents, and other variables. This is a foundational datasets for studies of coastal upwelling, hypoxia, fisheries, and climate variability. Oh look, *fisheries*. So even if you’re too cuntily ignorant to care about science in and of itself, you can see that the data is economically useful. Unlike you, you pointless twat.

These are just two examples, but OOI data has been used to understand dozens of crucial scientific issues, such as deep-ocean carbon export and biological productivity, AMOC variability (I’ll bet you don’t even know what that is despite the fact your life literally depends on it, you ignorant fuck), hydrothermal vent ecosystems at the Axial Seamount (extremophiles have been hugely important in medicine, but you’re too much of a gut-wrenching moron to be able to cope with that kind of chain of value), coastal hypoxia and oxygen loss off the U.S. Pacific Northwest (again, fucking fisheries, not that you’ll give a shit about them either, because all you care about is your stupid idiot fucking wins on the internet, and you have idiotic blind faith that somehow food will just magically continue to appear for you in the future without effort, you medieval cocksucker), and air-sea heat and carbon exchange in the subpolar North Atlantic.

You people are so fucking gleefully, wilfully ignorant of everything. You are simpletons, and you think everything is simple because simplicity is all you can deal with. In the past you’d have been ashamed of your stupidity. Now you’re so stupid, you’re too dumb to even know you’re dumb.

Re: shit world

By jd • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

This is “victory” because the Dems like the environment, so stopping anyone from knowing about it is ergo “beating the Dems”.

Same reason the Republicans were all about demolishing the ACA (an act written by a Republican and then edited by Republicans because the Democrat proposals weren’t acceptable to them). The ACA was voted on by Dems and therefore had to be destroyed, the fact that it has led to many Americans being without any healthcare at all and more than a few dying as a result is considered an acceptable price to pay for killing something Democrats voted for.

“Victory” is not about doing anything worthwhile, it’s about “owning the Dems”.

Re:shit world

By ArchieBunker • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The worst part is this terrorist has cult followers. I’m stealing this quote but it applies:

The only difference between Donald Trump and Jim Jones is that Trump would charge you for the kool aid.

Re:D.o.g.e.

By PleaseThink • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The overhead to the student loan system could be reduced a lot if each administration stopped changing everything every few years and actually followed the existing contracts. Do you remember all the lawsuits against the 1st Trump administration for not properly following the payment plan terms? That was a massive waste of government money. Constantly changing things significantly increases bloat around that system as you have to support the old rules, the new rules, deal with switch people between the two, trip over all the new edge cases, etc…

Trump supposedly defrauded the IRS out of 100 million by double-dipping on tax losses. That’s enough to run this system for 2 years from one person. How about enforcing existing laws so the government has enough funds to operate?

There’s around 3,900 colleges in the USA. If you really believe there’s 39 million people (11% of the country) administrating student loans you’ve got a seriously wrapped view of the world. Please seek help and stop viewing whatever news source you got that info from.

If the program was simply proving bad info, it would be dropped. It wouldn’t be dismantled. Dismantling costs money. Simply dropping it is free. If this was purely a cost cutting move, it would be dropped. If they’re trying to recover material from the network, it would be sold as-is and the recyclers would have to recover it. Anything more is a waste of government funds.

Microsoft’s Project Solara Is an OS For Devices That Run AI Agents Instead of Apps

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from GeekWire:
A team inside Microsoft has been quietly building a platform for devices that run AI agents instead of apps, based on Android instead of Windows, with two working hardware designs so far, and an initial set of big-name companies lined up to run pilots. The platform, dubbed "Project Solara,” is Microsoft’s bet that AI will open up entirely new scenarios for computing — using agents to avoid the constraints of traditional software, and off-the-shelf components to develop new devices quickly and inexpensively. […] The company unveiled Solara on Tuesday at its Build conference in San Francisco, describing it as a new platform that spans from chip to cloud. GeekWire got a behind-the-scenes look at the project during a briefing last week in Redmond, including demos of the first two concept devices based on the platform:

- A desktop hub that sits beside a PC and responds to voice commands, signs users in using facial recognition, and surfaces the day’s most pressing items. With a monitor attached, it becomes a full Windows machine running in the cloud.
- A wearable badge that reimagines the standard employee ID card. A fingerprint button wakes an agent in one press; a single tap records and transcribes a conversation; and a built-in camera lets the agent act on what the user sees.

Microsoft says it won’t ship these devices itself. Instead, it envisions hardware makers and other industry partners turning the reference designs into implementations of their own, each intended for a specific industry, company, or scenario. For example, in one demo shown by the company, the high-tech badge ran on agents designed for use by a health-care worker, including the ability to scan a patient’s QR code, record and transcribe the visit, log vitals, and start a prescription. In another application of the same badge, the built-in camera scanned a brainstorm board with ideas for an office revamp, and made a suggestion: add some plants.

The two devices are a starting point. The bigger opportunity, the company says, is all the tasks and workflows where a PC or phone gets in the way or isn’t practical to use. […] In the coming months, companies including AccuWeather, Best Buy, CVS Health, Levi’s, and Target are expected to begin pilots of devices based on the reference designs. The operating system is the Microsoft Device Ecosystem Platform, or MDEP, an enterprise version of Android that Microsoft developed for devices including Teams meeting-room hardware. The company says it chose MDEP over Windows deliberately, to run on smaller, lower-power devices while keeping the management and security features IT departments expect: patch and over-the-air updates, device integrity, Microsoft Defender, Intune, and Entra ID sign-in.
While the project is still in the early stages, Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella encouraged the team to show it at Build sooner than the company would normally show its work in public. “That underscores just how competitive and fast-moving the AI world is right now, but it also illustrates the pace that the new technologies are enabling,” reports GeekWire.
The report notes that the business model for the platform still needs to be worked out. The devices run on Microsoft’s Azure cloud, but beyond that, “the economics are still taking shape.”

Qualcomm and MediaTek have been chosen as the first chip partners. “The badge runs on a new Qualcomm wearable chip; the desk hub runs on MediaTek IoT silicon,” reports GeekWire. “Both are off-the-shelf, not custom, which is central to how Microsoft plans to keep devices cheap and fast to build.”

I’ve been rather OS agnostic over the years

By T34L • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

but I don’t think there’s a literally single OS I’d be less happy about being on my computer than this.

I’m excited for agents and I’ve been toying with them, but Microsoft’s walled garden of garbage that they’ll figure out 18 different ways to rugpull features out of and resell them back to you later is the worst possible idea for something future looking like this.

Well, it’s not on Windows…

By ndykman • Score: 3 Thread

I think there is increasing internal pressure inside Microsoft to leave Windows (and to an lesser extent) Office alone when it comes to AI. The pushback is growing from the userbase who just want to get things done.

Of course, AI bubble feeding Azure is also a thing. So, probably a good thing that somebody at Microsoft said “Android seems like a better bet for this” and the Windows group just nodded in agreement.

Combines my favorite things

By Austerity Empowers • Score: 3 Thread

It sounds slow, expensive, and invasive.

An OS is still an OS…

By ctilsie242 • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Unless Microsoft is moving to a new CPU architecture (Harvard architecture would be nice, but the NX bit does almost a good enough job with machines,) we are going still have hardware, the ISA, the hypervisor, the mysterious stuff that runs in ring -1 and -2 placed there by the local governments, maybe a hypervisor, the OS, then apps. Yes, we can merge an app with the OS, but even in the Apple 2 days, that was a lot of work, especially with dealing with low level I/O.

So, this means we have an OS created that has a fast path to the matrix multiplication (with carry) on the cores, with the OS as small as possible. Assuming that they will turn their noses up at BSD and Linux kernels, there is always QNX.

At the filesystem level, TernFS is what some banking industries are using at the exascale. It doesn’t have permissions and such as a normal filesystem, but designed to handle data on a large scale. Might as well go with this.

For RAM, I’ve seen some devices that actually use the GPU’s VRAM as a swap device and balloon into that.

Overall, the “AI OS” may not be true realtime, but it can help, but it needs to be able to reassign resources as need be, be it using Optane-tier storage (if it exists at all), and the OS is focused on quickly getting software requests to the cores that handle the matrix and tensor manipulation.

If it were up to me, I’d not bother writing another OS. Just using Linux and contributing mainline kernel patches would more than pay for itself, especially when the mainline patches become part of LTS distributions. If designing a hardware architecture just for AI was fundamentally so different that conventional OS kernels couldn’t be used, then see about a Linux emulator so people could port tools to the OS and cross-compile. An OS needs to be able to run gcc natively, or it is not going to last long.

Mathematicians Warn of AI Threats to Profession As Industry Encroaches

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
A new Leiden Declaration, endorsed by the International Mathematical Union and published on June 2, 2026, warns that AI could undermine mathematics by flooding the field with plausible but flawed proofs, weakening attribution, shifting incentives, and giving tech companies too much influence over research priorities. “Mathematicians should find it quite striking that tech companies are suddenly interested in their work,” said Kevin Buzzard, a mathematician at Imperial College London, in a statement. “The Leiden Declaration is a well-thought-through response to what is currently happening, as AI continues to disrupt this space.” Ars Technica reports:
The Leiden Declaration, which has already drawn hundreds of signatories, warns that recent AI developments are threatening “characteristic values” of mathematical research, “often in ways that disproportionately affect students and early-career mathematicians, and hence the long term future of the discipline.”

First, it points out how AI models can “produce plausible but unreliable (or even incorrect) arguments which are difficult to distinguish from correct mathematical proofs.” Such developments put reviewers under increasing pressure and are “jeopardizing our ability to implement traditional standards for the correctness, transparency, and independent verifiability of proof,” the declaration warns. “Inaccurate AI-generated drafts are cheap to produce, and there is a risk of cluttering the literature with claimed results that are simply wrong,” said Leslie Ann Goldberg, head of computer science at the University of Oxford, in a statement. “Once that happens, the errors are likely to propagate as new results are built on faulty foundations.”

Second, the declaration highlights how “models trained on published works frequently return outputs that do not properly cite the human works they synthesize,” while also pointing out that many current AI models were trained on data obtained through “exploiting licenses and access arrangements” or “simply violating copyright protections.”

Third, the declaration describes how the use of AI “may become incentivized for its own sake, disrupting our mechanisms for hiring, funding and recognition” while leaving out researchers who lack access or are “unwilling to use technologies controlled by organizations whose values they do not share.”

Fourth, the declaration warns against mathematics research “communicated through informal channels such as press releases or blog posts, often without any research paper or other disclosure of information necessary for scientific evaluation.” Such communication strategies can lead to “oversimplification” in media reporting that overemphasizes AI tools’ significance at the expense of prior human contributions, and “misleadingly uses specific mathematical tasks as metrics for the general reasoning capacities of commercial products.”

Fifth, the declaration describes “increasing involvement of technology companies in mathematical research” as threatening the “autonomy of mathematics,” especially as university budgets are under pressure and researchers may feel greater professional incentive to collaborate with technology companies on “asymmetric terms.” This also raises the risk that mathematics research questions amenable to AI-driven techniques may be prioritized.
What can mathematicians do about this? The Leiden Declaration urges them to treat AI as a tool, not a substitute for human responsibility. Individual mathematicians should disclose AI use, remain accountable for the correctness of their work, continue crediting human authors, and use AI tools only when they align with the declaration’s values.
It also warns that mathematics can be applied to “warfare, oppression, mass surveillance, and the undermining of democracy,” so mathematicians should weigh the ethics of tech-industry partnerships carefully. Professional organizations are encouraged to develop AI-use guidelines for publication and review, protect researchers from having their work used as training data without consent, support peer-reviewed publishing, and “actively prepare to become involved if major mathematical results are claimed using unconventional means.”

For policymakers, the recommendations are blunt: “protect the rights of authors,” “regulate the artificial intelligence industry,” and “invest in public computational infrastructure.” The declaration also urges people to “don’t believe the hype,” warning that tech companies have “a strong commercial incentive… to overstate the capabilities of their products.”

Mathematicians

By rossdee • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Are worried about losing their monopoly of imaginary numbers.

Not logical - argument attacks pubs, not AI

By SlashTex • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Complaints—
AI doesn’t attribute prior research correctly
AI proofs are sloppy
Some mathematicians do not want to use AI
AI publication threatens the autonomy of academic mathematics.

This is all symptomatic with the publication process of the AI research, not the research itself. These academics (and I am one) are not making their case logically. No one wants to see professional jobs in their fields consumed by AI. However, it is unavoidably coming. These profs need to embrace AI if they are going to maintain their worth. As we all will have to do.

Re:Software developers entered the chat

By BlueKitties • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I’m a mathie that specialized in programming adjacent things.

My main takeaway for programming people is: math is like encryption. Don’t make your own. Really, even something as harmless as the quadratic formula shouldn’t be coded in directly, for “reasons.” Just trust me, use a pre-built library function to get what you need.

That is all.

Re:It’s a huge problem for open source

By oldgraybeard • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
BS the technical people I know do side stuff to scratch and itch. Not to pad a resume.

Re:This will push formalisation into the mainstrea

By jonsmirl • Score: 5, Informative Thread

AI can easily write the lean for any proofs they do. The problem is that lean is missing large parts of established mathematics.
My current lean project has to cite all of these externally due to missing lean support.

    Functional equations / means
    - lit_aczel_1948 — Aczél: symmetric + homogeneous means power/quasi-arithmetic mean (the CES forcing)
    - lit_aczel_1966_weighted — weighted Aczél characterization (weighted means)

    Fixed-point / topology
    - lit_brouwer_1911 — Brouwer fixed point
    - lit_cellina_approximate_selection_1969 — approximate selection (closed-graph correspondences); with Brouwer
      Kakutani
    - lit_glicksberg_1952 — Glicksberg fixed point (infinite/Bayesian games)
    - lit_berge_maximum_theorem_1959 — Berge maximum theorem (upper-hemicontinuity)

    Probability / large deviations
    - lit_sanov_1957 — Sanov / method of types (large-deviation rate = KL)
    - lit_fisher_tippett_gnedenko_1928 — extreme-value theorem (GEV limit laws)
    - lit_kolmogorov_1931_fokker_planck — Fokker–Planck diffusion equation

    Optimal transport / matching
    - lit_sinkhorn_1967 — Sinkhorn matrix scaling (entropic OT)
    - lit_lp_strong_duality_1951 — LP / transportation strong duality (Gale–Kuhn–Tucker)
    - lit_entropic_penalty_cominetti_sanmartin_1994 — entropic-penalty -convergence (T0)
    - lit_gale_shapley_1962 — deferred acceptance produces a stable matching
    - lit_gale_shapley_proposer_optimal_1962 — proposer-optimality of deferred acceptance

    Stochastic calculus / PDE
    - lit_ito_1944 — Itô's lemma
    - lit_black_scholes_pde_solution_1973 — closed-form solution of the Black–Scholes PDE
    - lit_liouville_dirichlet — Liouville/Dirichlet (harmonic-function / PDE result)

    Dynamical systems
    - lit_saddlenode_passage_time — saddle-node “bottleneck” passage time / (Strogatz/Fenichel)

European Parliament Ditches Google For French Search Firm

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
The European Parliament is replacing Google with French search engine Qwant as the default on in-house computers, citing digital sovereignty and privacy concerns. Politico reports:
As of Thursday June 4, “Qwant will replace Google as default search engine on European Parliament computers,” officials told lawmakers in an email seen by POLITICO. The change is being made “in line with the Parliament’s commitment to digital sovereignty and the protection of users’ personal data.” The search-engine switch comes as Brussels doubles down on its push for tech sovereignty. The European Commission will on Wednesday unveil its long-awaited tech sovereignty package aimed at reducing dependence on foreign technology providers and boosting European alternatives.

The email described Qwant as a “privacy-focused European search engine” designed to avoid tracking users or collecting personal data. Founded in 2013, Qwant markets itself as a privacy-first alternative to Google. Searches conducted through the address bar in Firefox and Edge browsers will automatically be routed through Qwant, although lawmakers will remain free to use competing search engines or change their default settings.

Go to google.com and search for qwant

By tom_asdf • Score: 5, Funny Thread
I went to google and searched for qwant, just to annoy google :)

Re:Any good?

By higuita • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Yes

i use qwant for my main browser and startpage for the secondary one and sometimes try the duckduckgo in a third one

qwant works fine, a little slower than google, but i imagine that the hardware that google have available is several times bigger than qwant may have.
Results, for what i search (mostly tech related info) work well, don’t miss google and if something do not show up, i try a different engine

startpage, in the past it looks that most results are from google anyway and while it had zero ads, now it also have some too. It works fine

duckduckgo, while i use this one less, it is also for some reasons, i like less the results, seems to return more sites that have some of the words but not all, making the results less useful

So usually use all these engines and very rarely end use google, mostly by accident in browsers with new profiles or in other people computers

Google right now is overrated, just like altavista got heavy, full of trash and got less useful results with time, google arrived and took them over with clean page and good results. I feel that google is in the same path, results work but the junk also, ads annoying and now AI… it is in the path of being replaced

Re:Any good?

By JimMcc • Score: 4 Thread

I periodically try Duck, Duck, Go, and promptly revert to Brave. I’ll try searching in DDG for the exact text of the title of an article, blog post, tech support post, etc., and it doesn’t find it, even on major sites like MS. DDG always leaves me scratching my head, wondering what internet they’re indexing. I’ll give qwant a try and see how it fairs.

Getting their money’s worth from Trump

By high_rolla • Score: 3 Thread

A lot of the tech titans CEO’s were present and sucking up to Trump in the early days, no doubt hoping to gain some benefit from his influence.
Now they must be kicking themselves. If this continues it will actually snowball. European governments moving away from US tech will probably be a financial hit in the $millions. But if flows on. Some employees will like the alternatives / get used to them and start using them at home, other companies that interact with the European governments will slowly switch over too to make interaction easier. All this extra revenue and publicity for European and open source products will help them in growing and improving. As they get better, more people will be enticed to switch. And so it continues…
And once the momentum starts, even after Trump has left, the shift away from US tech will continue.
These companies now stand to lose many $billions in the long term and also the crucial part which is their status as the gatekeepers of tech.

Excellent

By sit1963nz • Score: 3 Thread
The world needs competition from non-us sources .

Good to see they are dumping Windows/Office/etc too , so hopefully OSS will get a big boost. Then they can export that knowhow to the rest of the world.

Let it be free of AI too (in this case AI is artificial insemination ), because it will mean you are right fucked if you have it.

Russian Spy Agency Says Foreign Spies Turned Officials’ Smartphones Into Surveillance Devices

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot
Russia’s FSB claims foreign intelligence services compromised smartphones belonging to senior Russian officials, allegedly turning them into surveillance devices capable of stealing data, recording conversations, and activating microphones or cameras. “This software is used to steal existing data, eavesdrop on ongoing conversations, and conduct covert acoustic and video monitoring of the environment near electronic devices, all aimed at obtaining sensitive information,” the FSB said. The Register reports:
The agency said it had opened a criminal investigation into illegal access to computer information and the distribution of malicious software. It did not identify the alleged intelligence service responsible, disclose how many officials were affected, name the malware involved, or provide any technical indicators that would allow independent verification of the claims. As things stand, the FSB has revealed the accusation but not the proof.

piggy backing?

By algaeman • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Did they just add an additional endpoint to the collection gathering the FSB had already installed on the phones?

so you’re saying . . .

By kencurry • Score: 5, Funny Thread
Same as a regular mobile phone.

Is it wrong?

By mackil • Score: 5, Funny Thread
Is it wrong to feel okay with Russia complaining about hacking for a change?

You know what they say

By CEC-P • Score: 4, Funny Thread
Those in glass houses should
Dang it, it erased the Russian characters. Anyway, it said fuck off lol.

Are normal russian phones NOT spy devices?

By gurps_npc • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Because all western smart phones are spy devices.

I would be shocked, shocked to hear that russian phones were not already spy devices.