Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. EA Is Now Officially Privately Owned
  2. Apple Limits Bug Bounty Submissions After Flood of AI Slop
  3. Bending Spoons to Buy Airtable For $1.28 Billion
  4. Microsoft Tells Engineers ‘Tokenmaxxing Is Not What We Are Optimizing For’
  5. Trump Begins Selling $100,000 Monthly Subscription Service to Wall Street
  6. Trump Administration Drafting Ban On Chinese Data Center Devices
  7. Apple Says More Ex-Employees May Have Taken Confidential Data to OpenAI
  8. Apple Launches Legal Challenge Against UK Demand To Access Encrypted User Data
  9. Sandisk and SK Hynix Publish First Open High Bandwidth Flash Standard
  10. Russia-Linked ‘Midnight Blizzard’ Group Hijacks Hotel Wi-Fi With CaptiveCrunch
  11. Spain Offers $1.14 Billion To Get Thirty Meter Telescope Moved To Canary Islands
  12. OpenAI’s Astra Solved Decades-Old Math Problems For $2,000
  13. An AI-Supervised Remote Exam Went So Badly That 58,000 Students Must Retake It
  14. Schools Are Ditching Chromebooks For MacBooks By the Thousands
  15. Microsoft Is Bringing Xbox 360 Games to PC

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

EA Is Now Officially Privately Owned

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Longtime Slashdot reader neoRUR shares a report from Game Developer:
EA Sports FC and Battlefield publisher EA has been taken private by an investor consortium led by Saudi Arabia’s sovereign Public Investment Fund (PIF). The move means the U.S. juggernaut is no longer a publicly-traded entity and is now majority owned by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia through its PIF investment arm. Other investors include Silver Lake and Affinity Partners, the latter of which was established by U.S. president Donald Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner.

The $55 billion transaction was financed via a combination of cash from PIF, Silver Lake, and Affinity Partners as well as roll-over of PIF’s existing stake in EA — constituting an equity investment of approximately $36 billion. Notably, $20 billion of debt financing was provided by JPMorgan Chase Bank. The deal cleared the necessary regulatory hurdles in July, paving the way for its completion at the close of trading on August 4, 2026. It was approved by regulators in major markets such as the European Union and the United States without incident, despite lawmakers and union leaders in the U.S. calling on the Federal Trade Commission to heavily scrutinize the leveraged buyout over geopolitical and employment concerns.

Great

By Bahbus • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Another, and even better, reason to never touch anything produced or published by EA ever again. Fuck the Saudis.

“EA Ruins Things”…

By Moryath • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
Now complete with garbage misogyny, antisemitic genocidal nutbaggery, and the rest of the horrible baggage of the Saudi Terrorist Crime Family.

EA is a Dead Man walking

By rsilvergun • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
They don’t 20 billion dollars of leveraged buyout debt on them. If you think EA sucks now you haven’t seen anything yet. They have to get out from under that debt and the only way they can think of to do that is to abuse their employees and their customers. They are already abusing the employees pretty much as much as a legally can.

I expect they will start outsourcing things to foreign countries with cheap labor that they frankly can’t really do because it’s going to create weird cultural problems to do so. On top of that they have already started trying to add even nastier microtransactions in. And this is EA we are talking about.

I feel bad for anyone who’s into their sports games because they’re going to basically collapse but because of monopolies you’re still going to be stuck with them. So if that was your hobby then it’s basically going to go to shit and there’s nothing you can do about it.

Once again this is one of those cases where antitrust law enforcement would have protected your hobby. People sometimes complain because I’m bringing politics into a hobbyist discussion but whether you like it or not politics is going to intrude on your life you don’t get to stick your head in the sand anymore…

Apple Limits Bug Bounty Submissions After Flood of AI Slop

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Apple has capped the number of open bug-bounty reports researchers can submit after being flooded with low-quality and sometimes entirely fabricated vulnerabilities generated by AI. MacRumors reports:
The Financial Times learned of the limit after cybersecurity startup Bynario used ChatGPT to locate more than 50 macOS bugs in three weeks. Bynario found a privilege escalation exploit that could let an attacker get unrestricted access to a Mac, but was unable to report it because Apple limited the number of bug reports Bynario could submit. Bynario sent eight reports to Apple in 2025, and another five in 2026 before hitting a restriction.

Bynario’s founder said it is a “very difficult time in the industry” because companies are being “flooded by the sheer amount of bugs.” Apple has since been in contact with Bynario and is reviewing the company’s submissions. While Apple now has a cap on the number of open submissions a researcher can have, researchers can request an increase to make sure Apple’s security team doesn’t miss a critical vulnerability.

Bending Spoons to Buy Airtable For $1.28 Billion

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Bending Spoons has made its first acquisition since going public last month at an $18 billion valuation, agreeing to buy spreadsheet and database startup Airtable for $1.28 billion in cash. Airtable joins a growing portfolio of notable brands owned by the Italian app developer, including Evernote, WeTransfer, EventBrite, and Vimeo. TechCrunch reports:
Founded in 2013, Airtable has so far raised more than $1.4 billion over multiple funding rounds. At its peak, during the boom days of 2021, it was valued at over $11 billion, but earlier this year, its shares were said to be trading on the secondary markets at a valuation of $4 billion. With its current net cash-and-cash-equivalents balance, Airtable is now valued at about $2.25 billion, Bending Spoons said.

“Airtable is a pioneering brand reshaping how teams organize data and manage critical workflows. The value being delivered is reflected in annual recurring revenue growing over 20% YoY to approximately $480 million as of June 2026, and joining forces with Bending Spoons will accelerate innovation even further,” Bending Spoons’ founder Luca Ferrari said in a statement.

Who?

By dbialac • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Who^2?

Bending Spoons sucks

By quonset • Score: 4, Informative Thread

My dad lost access to his email account (AOL) for over two months. Every time we called all we were told was everything looked good with his account, but if we pay them, Bending Spoons, they can get us help.

Submitting a support issue through their web site got AI responses. The last email I have from them was from “Greg” telling me he’d reviewed everything and repeated the exact same thing we were told when we called. The problem was, “Greg” had previously asked me for a screenshot of what my dad was seeing, which was a blank, white screen when he was challenged to prove he was who said he was, something he never had to do in the decade he was with AOL.*

Had “Greg” truly reviewed the account, “he” would have seen his comment to approve the request was impossible because there was nothing to approve.

Bending Spoons is just an aggregator of crap companies. Anyone who put money into their stock is getting scammed.

* My dad’s email was moved from his ISP to AOL which is why he has an AOL account. I recently got him another account somewhere else where all his important stuff, such as medical and financial information, won’t be held hostage by an incompetent company.

Microsoft Tells Engineers ‘Tokenmaxxing Is Not What We Are Optimizing For’

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Microsoft is introducing AI token budgets for employees, making the cheaper GPT-5.6 its default internal model and telling engineers to focus on business results rather than maximizing AI usage. 404 Media reports:
“As we accelerate our use of GitHub Copilot to deliver on our goals, we all need to be aware of how we consume tokens,” Jay Parikh, an executive vice president at Microsoft said in an email to Microsoft employees. GitHub is owned by Microsoft, and GitHub Copilot is an AI coding tool. “Tokenmaxxing is not what we are optimizing for. I want all of us focused on maximizing outcomes that move the needle for our customers and our business.” “As such, we are updating our internal guidance and managing token spend with the same discipline we apply to every other critical resource,” Parikh said in the email.

Parikh’s email says that in an effort to “get greater value from our token investment” Microsoft is making OpenAI GPT-5.6, which is cheaper to use than other models, the default model for internal use. His email also links to updated internal Copilot guidelines stating that, as of July 2026, Microsoft divisions will have an “AI token budget target,” and that employees can track their individual AI spending. “While there is no target spend value being shared at this time. The data shows that many engineers spend in the range of hundreds of dollars a month to a few thousand dollars in tokens,” the guidelines say. They also say that some decisions may place further restrictions as they monitor spend.

[…] Parikh’s email said Microsoft will keep learning and adjusting its AI policies as models and products evolve, and stressed that he doesn’t want to slow down the company’s progress towards becoming “AI-first.” “We are not optimizing for fewer tokens,” he said. “We are optimizing for more impact per token.

The metrics you chose create the behavior you see

By Locke2005 • Score: 3 Thread
If you’re measuring token use, you’re encouraging token use to game the stats.

This is pretty much the beginning of the crash

By gweihir • Score: 3 Thread

They have dropped the narrative about replacing people because it became totally unsustainable. But that narrative was the only thing that could have made the large LLMs profitable and it was what brought the employee-hating CEOs on board.

I do not think the hype will even make it to the end of the year.

Damn dyslexia

By fahrbot-bot • Score: 3 Thread

Tokenmaxxing Is Not What We Are Optimizing For

I was half way through re-reading The Two Tower - (*sigh*)

Re:WTAF??

By karmawarrior • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Because a lot of corps are saying the opposite right now, saying you’ll be judge on your use of AI, and punished for your lack of use of it.

Which is why you get insane shit like people punching bullet points into ChatGPT telling it to expand it into a full email, and the recipient receiving it and putting that into ChatGPT to summarize it as a set of bullet points.

I’d say I’m glad the companies who have been doing this are the ones who’ll eventually go tits up when the bill comes in (which is more than the cost of tokens, it’s the lack of control over their own businesses), but the reality is that management isn’t the group that’ll suffer. The people fired for non-compliance with this stupidity are merely the first in a long line of people who’ll get hurt despite never doing anything more than what their managers said they had to do.

This timeline absolutely sucks.

Re:This is pretty much the beginning of the crash

By karmawarrior • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

> But that narrative was the only thing that could have made the large LLMs profitable and it was what brought the employee-hating CEOs on board.

Doesn’t have to be sustainable, just needs to keep businesses using them for long enough that critical business knowledge is lost among employees who become reliant upon the LLM providers for everything.

The question was never “Is this unsustainable if taken at face value”, because the plot was never to sell useful services, it was to take over most US businesses by making them unable to run themselves. The question now is whether they managed to keep it going for long enough that this will happen, or whether the crash will happen before that to happen.

People often describe BigAI as a con. But BigAI is better described as a heist.

Trump Begins Selling $100,000 Monthly Subscription Service to Wall Street

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Trump Media has officially launched its $100,000-per-month data feed giving trading firms machine-readable access to Truth Social posts milliseconds before the public. According to Fortune, five Wall Street firms have already signed up for the service, which “would generate about $500,000 in monthly revenue, or $6 million annually.”

Critics argue the service could let President Trump, who owns about 41% of the company, profit from early access to market-moving presidential communications. “I’ll be blunt,” Gian Luca Clementi, an economics professor at NYU Stern School of Business, told Fortune. “This is insider trading by definition.”

“He’s going to monetize the role of the office of the president of the United States,” he said. “The undisputable fact is that somebody is going to earn some more money than before, and that’s the president of the United States.” From the report:
Trump’s media venture has struggled to build a profitable social media business despite its lofty valuation. Truth Social has reported significant operating losses since going public. According to the company’s earnings report for Q1 2026, Trump Media & Technology Group netted a roughly $405 million loss and raised less than $900,000 in sales.

Not everyone agrees the arrangement meets the legal bar for insider trading. Shannon Devine, a spokeswoman for Trump Media & Technology Group, has pushed back on the characterization, telling Quartz that Truth API “offers customers the fastest way to ingest publicly available Truth Social data” and that critics “must have invented a new theory of ‘insider trading’ based on publicly available information.”

Classic insider trading law hinges on trading on secret, material information in breach of a fiduciary duty, and Truth Social posts are, by design, meant to become public within moments — raising real doctrinal uncertainty about whether faster access alone qualifies. But other legal experts argue the greater risk lies ahead. Richard Painter, former White House chief ethics counsel, has argued that the arrangement could violate federal law once Trump posts genuinely market-moving news — on tariffs, military action, or other policy decisions — before it’s public, with Truth Social effectively acting as a paid “tipper” on the president’s behalf.
Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) said he plans to introduced legislation Tuesday to ban the president from selling expedited access to his statements.

Re: Ok, so since market has started ignoring him

By Tomahawk • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Republican “god” can do no wrong, though. The man could walk into the middle of 5th Avenue, shoot a woman in the head, and then fuck her shattered skull, and they’d still sing his praises. Indoctrination. Cultism. Brainwashing. So many different names for how they idolise this man.

When milliseconds count

By angryman77 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
This is material non-public information until after its available to the public…several milliseconds in the future. Definitely insider trading.

Re: Ok, so since market has started ignoring him

By drinkypoo • Score: 5, Informative Thread

I never see Democrats defend Pelosi trading. I see maggots defending Trump grifts constantly. I hang out in places where I’m exposed to both. Stop making shit up, maggot.

Re: Ok, so since market has started ignoring him

By jacks smirking reven • Score: 5, Informative Thread

1. You have no evidence that Pelosi insider traded anything and her husband has always been a wealthy real estate investor and venture capital guy.
2. The Pelosi’s are worth somewhere in the $300m mark and she has served 20(!) terms in Congress, that’s 40 years.
3. Trump and his family have made north of $2 billion since 2025
4. Democrats have for years had bills to ban stock trading with scant Republican support.

So who’s ignoring what again? TDS is what you are infected with.

Re: Ok, so since market has started ignoring him

By EmagGeek • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Well, to make a not so subtle point, there WAS an armed revolt, but it was in defense of all this, not in opposition.

Trump Administration Drafting Ban On Chinese Data Center Devices

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Longtime Slashdot reader schwit1 shares a report from Reuters:
The Federal Communications Commission, which oversees the U.S. telecom industry, is working on the measure to bar imports of new Chinese optical transceivers, which allow data to travel over fiber-optic cables at the speed of light within data centers. Officials hope to publish it this year, when it would take effect. The move, not previously reported, aims to prevent Chinese firms from stealing data, installing malware or disrupting service at U.S. data centers, which house the chips to train and run AI models.

The FCC could still modify or shelve the restriction, the sources stressed, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive matters. […] A U.S. ban on new models of Chinese data center devices would likely hit China’s Zhongji Innolight, one of the biggest global sellers of transceivers, which was added to the Pentagon’s list of alleged Chinese military-backed companies in June. The list can be a harbinger of tougher action. A ban could also raise costs for American cloud firms such as Amazon Web Services, as it may force them to transition to other producers such as U.S.-based Coherent and Lumentum.

That is one way to stop AI DC builds

By CommunityMember • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Some of the largest buyers of Chinese manufactured transceivers are the hyperscalers. The hyperscalers represent more than half of Zhongji Innolight’s total revenue. While there may be other sources, blocking the purchase of Chinese manufactured transceivers may have a significant impact on the AI data center builds.

The power paradox

By ArchieBunker • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The FCC is powerless to regulate net neutrality yet powerful enough to ban random products over unfounded claims.

Re:That is one way to stop AI DC builds

By devnulljapan • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Some of the largest buyers of Chinese manufactured transceivers are the hyperscalers. The hyperscalers represent more than half of Zhongji Innolight’s total revenue. While there may be other sources, blocking the purchase of Chinese manufactured transceivers may have a significant impact on the AI data center builds.

So, it’s just another trump shakedown dressed up as national security then. He shakes this stick, mysteriously and completely coincidentally Anthropic and OpenAI and all the others pony up a few million in donations to his campaign or buy his crypto or gold shoes or whatever and all of a sudden the issue goes away … until the next round of bullying begins.

Stick but no carrot

By Turkinolith • Score: 3 Thread
They sure do talk about banning things, but so far I’ve seen very little done to actually get businesses to BUILD that stuff here. Seems all it will do is cut out choice and raise prices.

scare wording

By algaeman • Score: 4, Funny Thread
“is working on the measure to bar imports of new Chinese optical transceivers, which allow data to travel over fiber-optic cables at the speed of light within data centers” Oooh, scary. These are so high tech that they have been used in data centers for 30 years now. Maybe they should ban capacitors from China because these alternating plates of ceramic have the ability to cripple data centers when they fail.

Apple Says More Ex-Employees May Have Taken Confidential Data to OpenAI

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Apple is now seeking a preliminary injunction to prevent OpenAI and Jony Ive’s io startup from developing AI hardware allegedly based on stolen Apple trade secrets. “The iPhone maker also claims that more of its former employees may be involved with the trade secrets theft,” reports TechCrunch. From the report:
In a new filing, Apple is requesting expedited discovery from the accused OpenAI employees, senior systems engineer Chang Liu and Chief Hardware Officer Tang Yew Tan; OpenAI, and its foundation; and io, the device startup co-founded by Apple’s former lead designer Jony Ive. Apple also notes that its continued investigation has so far revealed 11 other former Apple employees beyond Liu and Tan may have been witnesses or otherwise involved in the case, and others who were previously named in the original complaint, like OpenAI employee Yu-Ting Peng.

The filing marks an escalation in Apple’s legal battle with OpenAI, as it suggests Apple has uncovered new evidence that the misconduct goes beyond the former employees named in the original complaint. “For example, another former Apple employee seems to have met with Mr. Liu and Ms. Peng in advance of Ms. Peng’s interview at OpenAI and discussed with them during that meeting Apple proprietary information relating to unannounced products,” the filing states. “Yet another former Apple employee took screenshots of confidential Apple documents relating to an unannounced Apple product before an interview at OpenAI.”

“And, after Apple filed its complaint, multiple former Apple employees now working at OpenAI reached out to discuss returning Apple-issued work devices they kept when they left Apple,” Apple claims, suggesting there were more who were possibly involved with the scheme. Apple is pushing the court to allow for expedited discovery because it believes it has good cause to suspect that there are others involved in the theft of its intellectual property. The company noted that its motion for a preliminary injunction is also pending.
Apple’s request for a preliminary injunction is “both based on false information and completely unnecessary because we do not have, nor want, any of their trade secrets,” said OpenAI in a blog post.

“We’re much more interested in building innovative products and technologies that push the frontier,” OpenAI’s statement reads.

Well

By drinkypoo • Score: 3 Thread

Good thing they BYOD so all that data is so easy to exfiltrate.

If I were OpenAI…

By ClickOnThis • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

…I would not want to hire thieves. They’re just as likely to steal from you as from their previous employer. Not saying OpenAI necessarily wouldn’t, just that I wouldn’t.

Let discovery take its course. If there’s any there there, we’ll find out what it is.

Apple Launches Legal Challenge Against UK Demand To Access Encrypted User Data

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Guardian:
Apple has launched a new legal challenge against a UK government demand to access its customers’ highly encrypted data, a year after the Home Office agreed to abandon its previous request. The US tech company launched the legal complaint last month at the Investigatory Powers Tribunal (IPT), an independent court that has the power to investigate claims that the UK intelligence services have acted unlawfully. The UK government had made a second request to Apple to grant it a “back door” to encrypted iCloud data belonging to British users, according to an order issued by the court.

Britain backed down on its original demand for access to data from UK and US customers last year, after a heated transatlantic tussle over encryption between London and Washington. UK authorities subsequently issued a new “technical capability notice” (TCN) to Apple that did not apply to American users. Apple is seeking to challenge the British government’s powers to issue TCNs under the UK Investigatory Powers Act, according to the details of the new legal case first reported by the Financial Times. […] The original TCN issued last year asked Apple for the right to see users’ encrypted data protected by its advanced data protection (ADP) program in the event of a national security risk.

Apple said the removal of the tool — which not even it can access — would make users more vulnerable to data breaches from bad actors and other threats to customer privacy. Creating a “back door” would also mean all data was accessible by Apple, which it could be forced to share with law enforcement possessing a warrant. As a result, Apple withdrew UK customers’ access to its ADP program in January 2025. The Home Office has maintained that the Investigatory Powers Act, under which such orders are issued, contains robust safeguards and is used only when absolutely necessary.

‘Robust Safeguards’

By mccalli • Score: 5, Informative Thread
Just for context, when its predecessor RIPA, Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act, came in it was said to be used only for cases such as terrorism etc.. Instead, it was found that councils started using to check people were putting things in the right rubbish bins for collection.

Robust safeguards indeed.

Sandisk and SK Hynix Publish First Open High Bandwidth Flash Standard

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
BrianFagioli writes:
Sandisk and SK hynix have published the first open technical specification for High Bandwidth Flash (HBF) through the Open Compute Project. HBF is designed to create a new memory tier between High Bandwidth Memory and traditional SSD storage, giving AI inference systems more near compute capacity without relying entirely on expensive HBM. The specification supports capacities up to 512GB using 8-high and 16-high NAND stacks, with bandwidth tiers ranging from about 0.4TB per second to 3.0TB per second. It also uses the UCIe chiplet interface, which could make HBF easier to integrate with CPUs, GPUs, and other accelerators. Google and Tenstorrent participated in the standardization effort, but commercial products and independent benchmarks are still missing.

An open standard… or a moat?

By memory_register • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Sandisk and SK Hynix are fleecing everybody - pc and phone makers, NVIDIA, the Mag7 - which means we are all paying a ton more for their products. They are essentially an oligopoly along with a small handful of memory makers. Did they do this out of the kindness of their hearts, or to create a standard they control to their own benefit?

Re:An open standard… or a moat?

By williamyf • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Sandisk and SK Hynix are fleecing everybody - pc and phone makers, NVIDIA, the Mag7 - which means we are all paying a ton more for their products. They are essentially an oligopoly along with a small handful of memory makers. Did they do this out of the kindness of their hearts, or to create a standard they control to their own benefit?

Same with Dell with CAMM and nVIDIA+Micron with SOCAMM (similar name, similar idea, completely different use cases). Both of those presented the original stadard as a PoC, and then handed it over to JEDEC, so they became CAMM2 and SOCAMM2, completely neutral industry wide standards.

I suspect the same will happen here, a few demo/lab/PoC products will be produced, and then this will be handed over to JEDEC, so that it becomes an industry wide standard.

What do they (SKHynix, Sandisk and before them Dell, Micron and nVIDIA) win by doing this? IF (and only if) there are patents involved, they win FRAND revenue (just as an aside, neither CAMM2 nor SOCAMM2 have patents involved). And wether there are patents involved or not, these companies have a leg up on the competition in terms of know-how and practice making the stuff.

Re:Optane

By geek • Score: 4, Informative Thread

It’s easy to blame Intel but that was a joint venture with Micron and Intel. IMFlash out of Lehi Utah. Micron was every bit as responsible and if I remember right still holds most of the patents.

You could even make the case it was Micron that killed it because they dumped the entire thing on Intel and sold off the Lehi fab. Without Micron sharing manufacturing costs and with scaling difficulties lagging behind traditional NAND bit density improvements, Optane became financially unviable.

Re:An open standard… or a moat?

By thegarbz • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Sandisk and SK Hynix are fleecing everybody

Supply and demand curve breakdown does not mean anyone is being fleeced. It just means someone with deeper pockets than you wants the limited thing more than you do. Their products are being sold at market rates.

They are essentially an oligopoly along with a small handful of memory makers.

Which is irrelevant. Being an oligopoly is just a state to describe how many companies are in a market. It doesn’t have any impact on the market. Actions have impacts on markets, and while this oligopoly has in the past been found guilty of collusion, there’s zero evidence that what is happening right now would be any different if there were 100 small manufacturers rather than a couple of large ones.

Did they do this out of the kindness of their hearts

No they did it to create a new market for a product they produce while offering benefits to potential customers. It’s the reason why any product is created. It’s literally how commerce works.

or to create a standard they control to their own benefit?

It’s an open tech spec, not too different from how virtually every other memory and storage spec is created, except the resulting spec requires no membership with JEDEC.

Russia-Linked ‘Midnight Blizzard’ Group Hijacks Hotel Wi-Fi With CaptiveCrunch

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
A Russia-linked group tracked as Midnight Blizzard has compromised hotel and conference Wi-Fi portals worldwide, redirecting guests to phishing pages and fake software updates that steal credentials, session tokens, and other sensitive data. Microsoft says the campaign, dubbed CaptiveCrunch, “targets traveling employees generally rather than a particular sector,” reports iTNews. From the report:
Midnight Blizzard, tracked internally by Microsoft under its earlier codename NOBELIUM, is attributed by the US and UK governments to Russia’s SVR (Sluzhba Vneshney Razvedki) foreign intelligence service. Microsoft’s technical analysis said compromises occurred in “several countries” without naming them, and it did not give a total number of affected venues, organisations or individuals.

A related investigation published earlier in July by security firm ReliaQuest, and which Microsoft cited in its report, found compromised captive portal gateways across multiple United States cities as well as in India and Saudi Arabia, mostly at hotels. ReliaQuest said the traffic it observed came from organizations across financial services, professional services, legal, health care, energy and retail, suggesting the campaign targets traveling employees generally rather than a particular sector.

[…] Where attackers gained a foothold, Microsoft said they deployed two main tools: CornFlake, a Windows remote access trojan (RAT) written in Go capable of keylogging, screenshot and webcam capture, audio surveillance and credential and session token theft. They would also drop ChocoShell, an in-memory PowerShell infostealer targeting browser cookies, saved passwords, Microsoft 365 single sign-on (SSO) tokens and wi-fi credentials. Microsoft also said it has seen indications the attackers might be targeting Android devices with similar prompts urging victims to download and install an APK file.

DEFCON

By backslashdot • Score: 3 Thread

I’m not too worried, as hotels should have these patched within two weeks. Just thank God there’s no hacker conference this weekend in a city like Las Vegas, which has the most hotel rooms in America.

Spain Offers $1.14 Billion To Get Thirty Meter Telescope Moved To Canary Islands

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Longtime Slashdot reader schwit1 shares a report from Behind the Black:
In a new bid to get the Thirty Meter Telescope (TMT) to move from Hawaii, which has blocked its construction for more than a decade, the Spanish government has put together a $1.14 billion package that would not only pay for construction on the Canary Islands, but would finance an additional half century of operations.
Tech Times provides some additional details:
The package is conditional on the TMT International Observatory formally choosing La Palma as its construction site. The financing architecture has three pillars and two additional contingent instruments. The first pillar is 400 million euros (approximately $456 million USD) from Spain’s Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities, routed through the Centre for Technological Development and Innovation (CDTI). This figure was first pledged a year ago in July 2025 as Spain’s initial bid.

The second pillar is a 300 million-euro (approximately $342 million USD) loan from the EIB [European Investment Bank] itself — subject to satisfactory completion of the bank’s technical, financial, and legal due diligence and approval by its governing bodies.

The third is a potential 300 million-euro (approximately $342 million USD) participation from the Instituto de Credito Oficial (ICO), Spain’s state development finance institution, evaluated under equivalent conditions to the EIB loan but subject to its own separate analysis. Spain’s export credit agency, Cesce, may also provide coverage instruments, and the EIB has left open the possibility of expanding its support through intermediated financing mechanisms or guarantees.

Let them choose

By Baron_Yam • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I’m all for keeping a nice environment, but whenever someone trots out the word ‘sacred’ I want them to fuck all the way off.

You know what should be sacred? Science and discovery. Even before it had a name and was formalized, science was advancing humanity’s state. It’s the reason we’re not still wandering the savannahs and forests of the world in small groups, subject to every random whim of Nature.

It’s a bad time to invest in anything knowledge-based in the US anyway.

Re: Hawaii blocked the TMT for more than a decade

By Ol Olsoc • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I don’t understand - what better monument to the sky gods could you build than an absolutely fecking mahoosive telescope?

The “Native Hawaiians” want us the Haole out of there, the blocking of the Space Telescope is just a way of messing with those they hate.

Re: Let them choose

By swillden • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Why not let the people who were first on the land choose? Europeans decimated indigenous Americans with disease and war..

Right, the land rightfully belongs to whoever owned it second-to-last! Not to the people the second-to-last owners forcibly ejected from it, of course, and not to the people who own it now, only to the second-to-last.

</sarcasm>

I think we should have more respect than we do for the indigenous peoples, but pretending that there was no war and no forcible land grabs before the Europeans arrived is not just ahistorical but ignorant of human nature. Polynesian history, which includes the Hawaiians, is incredibly bloody. The Europeans dominated when they arrived not because they were more violent — there’s a good case to be made that they were less, though it’s a question of degrees, not kind — but because the Enlightenment gave them much better tools. And, of course, because centuries of city living had bred up a bunch of diseases, but that’s part of the same story.

Did European arms and power make it “right” that the natives were conquered? No. But it wasn’t “right” that the natives conquered each other, either. Humanity — also as a result of the Enlightenment and the long, slow development of humanism — has become more moral and less violent, and we now have more respect for other cultures and other peoples. And that’s a good thing! But it doesn’t make sense to project our own moral views back in time, and it definitely doesn’t make sense to do so selectively, demonizing the winners and lionizing the losers.

The only thing that really makes sense is to apply our improved (though still very imperfect) morality to the situation we have now, messy, complicated and conflicted as it is. It’s nice to give the native Hawaiian culture some respect, but it’s wrong to give it more respect than that of Hawaii today.

Business Interests

By Wdi • Score: 5, Informative Thread

At least some of the most vocal opponents organize, in collaboration with energy drink maker Red Bull, motocross races on the slope of the volcano, right up to the top. These will have to stop because of the dust they produce. Just maybe there are real religious objections, but certainly there is money.

Re:Business Interests

By Rei • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

I take native Hawaiian religious objections seriously. These are people who take a fatalistic “Pele will take what she wants, it’s pointless to try to stop her” attitude toward lava flows running over their houses that seems utterly insane here in Iceland. We’ll buy up every available water pump on the international market and walk on active-flowing lava fields to save a harbour for a couple thousand people. We’ll keep running tourist sites right next to a volcano that erupts every couple months by building multi-story-high berms around it with giant bulldozers and cooling anything that tries to overtop to make the berms even higher. And it totally works . But Hawaiians will sit back and watch incredibly slow-flowing flows with easy diversion paths take out everything they hold dear. At best they’ll point to some primitive failed attempts in like the 1940s as a reason to not try, but then when pressed, it often comes back to: “Pele will take what she wants to take.”

Another example: geothermal drilling on the Big Island. Massive protests. Massive resistance, way beyond the token NIMBY resistance here. Meanwhile Hawaii continues to generate most of its electricity from oil, at great cost. Hawaii is the only other place (outside of Iceland) to have accidentally drilled into a magma chamber. In Hawaii they treated it as a major incident and immediately shut down the well. When we did it? Our reaction was, “WOW, we can produce REALLY hot steam from THIS well!”, made it into a production well, and started planning to drill more.

I guess one major difference here is that in the early Icelandic cosmology, volcanoes weren’t the product of a high-ranking creator goddess, but rather, Surtr, who was practically a demon and was fated to destroy the world. It’s good to resist Surtr!

OpenAI’s Astra Solved Decades-Old Math Problems For $2,000

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Forbes:
The cost of producing new results on ten longstanding mathematical problems just fell to $2,000, according to OpenAI, which says its Astra model generated machine-checkable proofs for questions that had resisted human progress for decades. OpenAI published the work on August 1 and used it to give its next major model family a name: Astra. The results run across group theory, high-dimensional geometry, coding theory, quantum complexity, lattice cryptography and extremal combinatorics. They arrived as a 249-page manuscript collection and, alongside it, something the field has not seen attached to an AI claim before at this scale: a machine-checkable certificate for every single result.

The problems were not textbook exercises dressed up as discoveries. Each had been open for at least ten years, most of them far longer, and several sit at the center of their subfields:
- A construction establishing the existence of non-sofic groups, a question that has occupied group theorists for years.
- A disproof of Connes’s rigidity conjecture, a long-standing problem in the theory of von Neumann algebras.
- An improvement to the general upper bound on sphere-packing density in high dimensions, a bound that had stood since 1978.
- Three problems come from the catalogue of open questions left behind by Paul Erdos.
The announcement follows another result from May, when OpenAI used a similar reasoning model to produce an original mathematical proof disproving a famous unsolved conjecture in geometry, which was first posed by Paul Erdos in 1946.

“Amazing but oversold”

By Goldenhawk • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

If you’re going to repost the entire lede of the story, at least also share the counterpoint: “Gary Marcus, a reliable critic of the field, called the release amazing but vastly oversold. Some specialists expect that once the dust settles, a few of the ten will look genuinely surprising and the rest will be classified as reachable problems that nobody had gotten around to attacking.”

And ironically, or maybe unironically, this story reads like it was AI-generated. Phrases like these:

“Three objections are worth taking seriously, and the honest reading concedes all three.”

“Grant every objection and the structural point survives intact. Whether the ten were cherry-picked or not, the certificates still verify. A curated result that mechanically checks is a different object from a curated result that does not.”

“The cost of producing a hard answer just fell to almost nothing, and the constraint moved to proving the answer is right.”

Most humans don’t write quite like that.

Re: Hold on to your papers…

By T34L • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
This is how it works. There’s more or less uncountable amount of “unsolved problems” in maths, but it’s like; okay, so now we have higher upper bound on packing higher dimensional spheres. If a person dedicated a few months of research to that, I’d applaud it as an example of human ingenuity and endurance. But, it’s nor a problem anyone needed to solve. It wasn’t something keeping anyone up at night. The practical applications of packing spheres in higher dimensions are… esoteric at the most generous. The LLM’s are sweeping up obscure problems that were unsolved because nobody would get a grant to work on them. And you can argue $2000 was cheap, but like, if you could spend $2000 to exactly count the amount of sand grains in a sand mine, it’d be impressive that it’s done and we know for sure now, but also, really not worth the $2000, and not exactly meaningful work anyone was waiting for. I think the relevant question to ask is; if the LLM’s are so damn smart, why haven’t they yet figured out optimizations that’d allow the companies making them actually make money? Why’re they worried with everyone else’s math problems, but somehow the companies making them continue being the least profitable, most expensive ventures in history?

Re: Hold on to your papers…

By backslashdot • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

You’d think there’ll be people solving the easy unsolved problems, but the fact is humans go for glamor. I’ll give you a specific example, in my company .. which does biotech .. I mention in passing to every intern the following: “there are about 20,000 genes in the human genome. For many of them, nobody has investigated what it does. You can find numerous lists on this (reference: https://unknome.mrc-lmb.cam.ac… ) .. for example a famous gene like TP53 (which causes cancer when fucked) has tens of thousands of publications made about it (though ironically there’s likely still stuff it does that we don’t know). Meanwhile as shown in the reference URL there are hundreds of genes that have had no papers published on them. Like zero, no publications .. given the resources available at this company we will let you investigate what those genes do and possibly find out something cool, but, you have to do it on your own time."

Guess how many interns have bothered to do that in the past decade? Zero.

Not an LLM

By phantomfive • Score: 5, Informative Thread
AI math proofs have been a thing for nearly half a century. There has been a LOT of work on it.

The work openAI is doing isn’t just saying, “ChatGPT, solve this problem.” They have combined their LLM (probably a custom LLM, with a math focus) with existing algorithms, and expert mathematicians working the prompt.

So this appears to be an incremental advance, but it’s not that an LLM automatically understands math and can start proving things.

Re: Hold on to your papers…

By Weirsbaski • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Meanwhile as shown in the reference URL there are hundreds of genes that have had no papers published on them. Like zero, no publications .. given the resources available at this company we will let you investigate what those genes do and possibly find out something cool, but, you have to do it on your own time.”

Guess how many interns have bothered to do that in the past decade? Zero.

I can think of a couple reasons nobody’s taken your company up on that.

- they’re interns (ie- short term). I worked tech full-time (and did some good stuff there), but the ramp-up on the company’s project and in-house processes took serious time - it was a full year before I could find my butt with both hands, so to speak

- and this research would be on their own time but with company resources. Meaning, discoveries would be owned by the company, and (depending on the company) the intern might not even get credit, or even paid for time spent finding them

An AI-Supervised Remote Exam Went So Badly That 58,000 Students Must Retake It

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica:
Earlier this summer, nearly 160,000 applicants took the entrance exam for UNAM, Mexico’s largest university. For the first time, they did it completely remotely, using a “lockdown” browser and AI-powered webcam proctoring software, over several weeks from late May through early June. It was a disaster. When exam results came in, they bore little resemblance to past results, especially at the top. Between 2021 and 2025, 3.5 percent of test takers scored 100 or more on the 120-question UNAM test. This year, 16.3 percent did so. The story was even worse at the highest of the high end. Between 2021 and 2025, 0.9 percent of test takers scored 110 or more; this year, 5.5 percent did so.

The surge in top scores led to accusations of widespread cheating, and UNAM appointed a commission of experts to investigate the situation. The group was given the unwieldy name “la Comision Tecnica de Personas Expertas para la Revision del Proceso de Seleccion de Ingreso a Licenciatura para el Circlo Escolar 2026-2027/1,” and it has just submitted its recommendations. The commission believes that the best path forward, given all the concerns, is to administer a “control exam” — that is, applicants will have to sit for another test, and they will do so in person.

This control exam will apply not only to those who secured a spot at UNAM based on this year’s test but also to everyone who would have been admitted based on minimum successful scores in their program of study since 2021. About 58,000 people could be affected, and places at UNAM will now depend on the results of the new test. (Details on the control exam should appear soon; classes are currently scheduled to begin on August 10, so everything will have to move quickly unless the school decides to delay classes.) According to Gaceta UNAM, the school’s official news publication, the university rector has apologized to honest applicants, since they will now have to prepare for and take the test again despite doing nothing wrong. Still, the control exam is “necessary to give certainty and guarantee equity in access,” the rector added.

If you’ve been falsely accused of cheating

By Valgrus Thunderaxe • Score: 3 Thread
on this exam, get an attorney (fast) and go after the school. 58,000 cheaters isn’t something believable.

Re:If you’ve been falsely accused of cheating

By thecombatwombat • Score: 5, Informative Thread

They didn’t say 58,000 people are accused of cheating.

They said enough people cheated that the results of the first test are just useless, so anyone who still wants a shot at getting in (about 58,000 people) will have to retake the test.

“According to Gaceta UNAM, the school’s official news publication, the university rector has apologized to honest applicants, since they will now have to prepare for and take the test again despite doing nothing wrong. Still, the control exam is “necessary to give certainty and guarantee equity in access,” the rector added.”

It’s in the freaking summary, this isn’t even a RTFA.

Hahahaha, “locked down browser”, hahahaha!

By gweihir • Score: 3 Thread

I had some discussion about the “locked down exam browser” in the software used here with my IT Security students. Apparently it is a complete joke and you can just set some OS variables and then run it in a window or a VM without any problem or any detection by it.

India exam leak

By dsgrntlxmply • Score: 4, Informative Thread
India recently had a leak of the NEET exam, and invalidated the results. There have been suicides as a consequence: NEET exam leak (BBC)

Schools Are Ditching Chromebooks For MacBooks By the Thousands

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Apple says its lower-cost MacBook Neo is beginning to displace Windows laptops and Chromebooks in K-12 schools, with several districts purchasing thousands of units. According to the company’s latest earnings call, nearly half of the large MacBook Neo purchases made by U.S. educational institutions last quarter reportedly replaced competing platforms. 9to5Mac reports:
Apple’s commentary highlighted some large district deployments moving to Neo Pinellas County Schools, one of the largest districts in Florida, which is moving its 25k students off Windows and onto MacBook Neo across its 18 high schools. In Washington, Peninsula School District 401 moved over its 8,000 students from Chromebooks to MacBook Neo. Midwest City-Del City School District in Oklahoma purchased more than 6,000 MacBook Neos to become an all-Apple district for students.

Re: You say that like it’s a bad thing

By ThurstonMoore • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

My iPhone 7+ that got 8 years of updates wants to know what the fuck you are talking about.

Apple got lucky on the timing

By Pollux • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Apple released the Neo at just the right time, at the right price, right when the market was stressed and looking for answers.

I’ve been ordering Chromebooks for my district for eleven years. Prices hit an all-time low of $227 per unit back in summer 2021. Since then, prices trended up for me year after year. Last year’s units were $297. This year’s were quoted to me in April at $430 each. I was able to find new-in-box 2025 models for $330 each and went with those instead. I was also warned that, if I ordered Chromebooks, it might take months before they would arrive. I have a neighboring school district that placed an order, then had it cancelled two months later because Dell couldn’t fulfill the order. (There are supplies of Dell Chromebooks to be found, but at the moment, Dell is prioritizing supplying its biggest vendors like CDW. Meanwhile, many districts in my area typically order through smaller in-state vendors who aren’t getting the same priority from Dell.)

The market is stressed this summer; supplies are low and difficult to find. Supplies that are available are 50% - 80% higher in price than last year. Apple comes along and says “You can buy an educational laptop right now for $500”, and hell yea, the fish are gonna bite. It has nothing to do with people suddenly falling in love with Apple, and everything to do with constrains in the marketplace.

And I have no love for Apple either. Don’t forget that schools have been begging Apple for a decade to release a $500 student laptop, and all Apple did was thumb their noses at us every single year. Why did they decide they now they need to release a $500 student laptop? It’s only because they’ve been losing business to Chromebooks for a decade.

Re: You say that like it’s a bad thing

By DogFoodBuss • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Weak. My iPhone 5s from 2013 just got the iOS 12.5.8 update earlier this year. 13 years of support and counting…

Re: You say that like it’s a bad thing

By slaker • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

That is repairable by the standards of Apple computers, not the standards of open hardware.

My experience dealing with a Chromebook deployment mirrors one of the grandparent commenters: 90% of the problems are broken screens, Screens are quick and easy to replace if you have the part, but screens cost money and you’ll never had as many as you’ll eventually need. You’ll have extra parts for everything else because of the staggering number of broken screens.

I have an occasional side job dealing with PC/laptop/Chromebook repairs at a local weirdo private Christian Academy. Given that the place definitely seems to have a “go pick the stick I’m going to beat you with”-vibe, I suspect there’s actually fewer broken systems than I might see from a similar deployment at a public school. Chromebook screens are still the biggest problem. One of the reasons I got this side gig is that an acquaintance saw the number of devices being written off and just assumed their day-to-day IT person couldn’t possibly know what they’re doing.

Anything else Apple does, unless their screens are indestructible or only cost $20 to replace, isn’t going to help with that.

Re: You say that like it’s a bad thing

By LazLong • Score: 5, Informative Thread

I bet you don’t have any school-age kids.

The school systems I’m familiar with assign notebooks to kids, and they carry them forward through future grades until they’re obsolete.

Microsoft Is Bringing Xbox 360 Games to PC

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot
Microsoft reportedly plans to let developers bring Xbox 360 games to PC and next-generation Xbox devices, with a gradual rollout expected between 2027 and 2028. A separate disc-to-digital program would also give players transferable digital licenses tied to their physical Xbox discs, preserving the ability to resell or trade them. The Verge reports:
With 360 games, developers can opt into making them backward compatible, and they will have control over things like a game’s price and if it’s available on Game Pass. The feature is expected to have a “gradual” rollout between 2027 and 2028 “across next-gen devices.” The “full launch” of original Xbox games on PC is also set for October 2026; the initial program announced in July included just four games.

The document also includes details about a way for players to get a digital version of a game that they already own on a physical disc, which The Verge’s Tom Warren reported on in July. The document says that if a player puts an Xbox One or Series game on disc into an Xbox One or Series X console with a disc drive, they’ll be granted a digital license that’s bound to “that disc and the player’s account.” The license will stay with a player across Xbox devices, but if the disc “changes hands,” the license will transfer to the new person. That should mean that gamers can still trade and sell discs; once the original owner of a disc does so, they can’t play the digital version they got from that disc anymore.

According to the document, a public beta for the disc-to-digital program was set for July with general availability set for August. We understand Microsoft had originally planned to test its disc-to-digital program with Xbox Insiders in July, but the beta was delayed. It’s unclear if the timeline of August general availability is still accurate.

hate to say it

By Lobachevsky • Score: 3, Insightful Thread

I hate to say it, but Microsoft has a reasonable approach with their planned disc-to-digital system. All the benefits of physical discs: visiting a friend’s house with the disc, selling the disc, plus all the benefits of a digital license: can run on a handled and other diskless systems. The idea that “the last account where the disc was used” would be the licensed owner gives a lot of flexibility, and the 2 biggest are going to a friend’s house or traveling with a handheld.

Of course, the devil’s in the fine print. Let’s see how their revocation system works for games using a 7-year music license. Steam has a good policy that if you own the game, they won’t revoke it due to license lapses; but Steam also sucks in that you can’t just take a disc to a friend’s house — they have to log into your steam account (which isn’t the end of the world). But Steam won’t sell the game once its licenses to content expire. And *many* games these days are cutting costs by licensing music for only a few years instead of in perpetuity. I don’t know, yet, how Microsoft will deal with that. If they revoke your game once it’s infringing on IP due to a lapsed music license, then it’s crap.

Get your Dupe on

By Vomitgod • Score: 4 Thread
Microsoft - can you help /. with dupe detection. https://games.slashdot.org/sto…