Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Amazon To Fund 12 Small Nuclear Reactors At Former Indiana Coal Plant
  2. Professor Calls To Abolish Business Schools For Failing Society
  3. TP-Link Moves to Assemble Routers In the US Following Import Ban
  4. Trump DHS Officials Asked CISA To Secretly Aquire and Hack a Voting Machine
  5. A Hacker Broke Into John Deere, SharkNinja With an Army of AI Agents
  6. Apple Announces October 28 ‘Pro and Tell’ Event
  7. Florida DMV Hacked After Police Dept Insecurely Stored Login Info
  8. Elon Musk Vows To Give a SpaceX Share To ‘Every Kid In America’
  9. Wine Ported to OpenBSD
  10. Elizabeth Holmes Doc ‘You Can See Everything’ Shocks With Massive Opening
  11. America Tries Reviving Shuttered Nuclear Plants - Partly to Help Power Data Centers
  12. Mozilla is Calling Out Microsoft for Forcing Edge on Users
  13. Anthropic Announces ‘Public Benefit Fund’, Committing 5% of Its Shares
  14. ‘Human Vs. Robot’ Cage Match Was Illegal, Says California
  15. New Video Game Law Proposed: ‘If You Pay For It, You Own It’

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Amazon To Fund 12 Small Nuclear Reactors At Former Indiana Coal Plant

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from TechCrunch:
Amazon is funding development of a proposed 960-megawatt nuclear plant in Indiana and would be the first customer to buy its power, the companies announced Monday. Utility company American Electric Power (AEP) would operate the plant. X-energy, which designs small modular nuclear reactors and went public in April, would supply the reactors. The new power plant would consist of 12 Xe-100 small modular reactors and be located on the site of a demolished coal power plant just south of Terre Haute. The deal is the second commercial agreement between Amazon and X-energy, and it’s three times larger than the first, which was announced two years ago.

Amazon has invested heavily in X-energy, leading a $700 million Series C-1 round in October 2024. The two companies have said they ultimately plan to build 5 gigawatts of new nuclear generating capacity in the U.S. by 2039. Unlike many newly announced power plants, these reactors would be connected to the public electric grid, though Amazon says the power would also serve its data centers.

The companies’ aggressive timeline still depends on X-energy successfully delivering its first power plant at a Dow Chemical plant southeast of Houston, Texas. The site, called Seadrift, has recently been at the center of a lawsuit filed by the state of Texas, which accuses the plant of “habitual non-compliance” with water and solid-waste regulations and permits. X-energy has yet to break ground at Seadrift, which will host four Xe-100 reactors to provide the chemical plant with heat and electricity. The company said its construction permit is in the final phases of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s review process.

Professor Calls To Abolish Business Schools For Failing Society

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
joshuark writes:
Professor Christopher Marquis makes a provocative argument about business schools: “We need to abolish them.” A 20-year business educator at Harvard, Cornell and Cambridge, Marquis argues in The New York Times and on LinkedIn that MBA programs sanctify profit-driven dealmaking at the expense of public life. “That’s not the institution failing,” he writes. “Sadly, it’s the institution working.”
“Business school doesn’t just hand out skills and a network,” argues Marquis, “it quietly reshapes how people see the world, rewarding dealmaking, simplification, and optimization for financial metrics, while workers and communities become afterthoughts.”
Marquis points to research suggesting that business-school-trained CEOs often benefit shareholders at the expense of workers, without delivering measurable improvements in company performance… "[W]hen a business-school-trained CEO takes over a firm, wages fall and labor’s share of income drops, with no gain in productivity,” writes Marquis. “In both the U.S. and Denmark, what passes for the ‘managerial skill’ of business-school graduates turns out to be a transfer of wealth away from workers and toward shareholders. Students deserve better than a machine that narrows their sense of what’s possible.”

Yes

By Retired Chemist • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
MBAs have ruined more companies than any other cause. They are just glorified accountants and typically have no understanding of the actual business, products, or customers. They are the heart of the consulting firms that are constantly selling (at a very high price) the latest management fad. That is one profession that I expect could be replaced with an AI and no one would notice.

So there are two kinds of Business schools

By rsilvergun • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
The first are just fine. They teach you a variety of skills for running a business typically a mix of accounting, some management and a bunch of statistics. It’s just a specialized degree focused on the skill sets needed to run a business.

The one that is a problem are the kind of schools Mitt Romney went to.

What Romney’s School taught him is how to break the law without breaking the law. It was a detailed program to teach him how to fleece the public without getting in trouble. That is a very different curriculum then what most of your MBAs walk away with.

Basically the Epstein class gets an entire type of education that is completely beyond anything you would assume is reasonable. It’s a focus on the legal aspects of business and teaching people what they can get away with when they’re ripping people off.

I don’t think we should abolish that degree I think we should abolish the legal system that makes that degree valuable.

Re: Yes

By Z00L00K • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Short term profits have been rewarded over long term sustainability of businesses. That’s the reason for enshittification.

Re:Yes

By Krishnoid • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
Yup, sounds about right. Maybe if they brought back the corporate death penalty, it would rein in some of the more heinous transgressions of business education and practice. Then again, public benefit corporations exist, and I figure business people need education for those as well.

Re: Yes

By hdyoung • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread
And yet, somehow, our crappy, failing, decaying, corrupt US-style capitalism is at the top of the pack, and has been there since ww2. So, pushing a century. Meanwhile, Russia is cratering towards becoming a 3rd world country. China, for all its very real accomplishments and strengths, has a system that produces workers that are literally a third as productive as US workers (same size economies but they have triple the workers, and there’s only one way that math works out).

Who else to compare to. South America, the Middle East and Africa aren’t even in the running. Don’t talk about places like Kuwait. They’re a village lucky enough to be floating on an ocean of light crude oil. Anyone can be rich if they’re handed a cheat code. India? They’ve still got a loonngg way to go. The only real contender is Europe. For the most part, they’re capitalist as well.

I would love to see some kinder, gentler economic system displace hard-nosed capitalism. But, so far, nothing else even comes close.

TP-Link Moves to Assemble Routers In the US Following Import Ban

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
TP-Link plans to begin assembling routers in Mississippi as early as 2027 after the FCC banned imports of new foreign-made consumer routers over security concerns. Engadget reports:
The company has signed a letter of intent with manufacturer Key Tronic and, pending approval from regulators, TP-Link says stateside assembly of its routers could start at a Mississippi production line as soon as early 2027.

Once things are up and running, Wi-Fi 8 routers are expected to be among the first TP-Link products that Key Tronic assembles. TP-Link claims that the agreement is part of its “long-term effort to accelerate US investment in high-tech manufacturing and job creation, designing and assembling next-generation products for American consumers here on American soil.”

The company said it will still have to source components from outside the US. “Many [components] are just not available from a domestic source, and this is not a TP-Link issue,” TP-Link’s corporate affairs officer Steve Kovsky told PC Mag. “This is an issue for all manufacturers that are trying to onshore manufacturing.”

So, a $0.50 step at the very end?

By gweihir • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

Yeah, great win. Probably will charge customers $10 more for that “Assembled in the USA!” line on the box.

Multiplier effect to wages paid to a worker.

By drnb • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
If a factory opens in a less prosperous state isn’t that a good thing? Keep in mind that there is a multiplier effect to wages paid to a worker. That worker will in turn spend money locally that helps support additional jobs. That factory sounds like a way to help a region reduce poverty.

Re:So, a $0.50 step at the very end?

By rsilvergun • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread
Also modern factory automation means that I won’t be any jobs. Go look up stuff like how the old steam controller is assembled. The Gundam factory is pretty crazy too there’s like three people that are responsible for manufacturing every single Gundam model kit on the planet.

Years ago I remember a sleeping bag company going out of business because they couldn’t compete with the larger companies. But at their peak they made something like a third of the sleeping bag sold in the country and they did that with technology from maybe 20 years ago and about 120 or 130 employees.

We should be talking more about how automation has hollowed out the middle class but I don’t think anyone has a solution for it. It would be one thing if magic machines automated all the work away but that’s not what they did. A shitload of jobs have been automated but a lot of people still need to work. But we are rapidly approaching the time when we have a large population of people for who there is absolutely no useful work. At the same time there’s a population of people who we really do need to do work and there isn’t a lot of overlap between the two. The people whose jobs got replaced by machines aren’t really capable of doing all that much more. They didn’t suddenly become super genius mathematicians or doctors or something.

So we’re going to basically have a rather nasty fight between a shitload of people who we don’t have any place for in society and a shitload of people who are needed to do what work is left. And I do not see how that fight resolves itself especially with the Epstein class egging both sides on

Cybersecurity or bringing a few jobs stateside?

By Zero__Kelvin • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) banned imports of new, foreign-made consumer wireless routers due to severe national security, supply chain, and cybersecurity risks. They already say that they will need to import components. Furthermore, is sounds like they are just assembling the devices here, not manufacturing them. Are they importing the PCBs then just putting them into other imported boxes here? Surely nobody would think that doing this somehow mitigates in any way any “cybersecurity risk”. I’m not against creating a few jobs in the US, but let’s not try to claim this has anything to do with cybersecurity. This may create a few jobs, but won’t mitigate any risk, and will likely cost citizens more while TP-Link increases its profits on our backs as we pay extra for that “Made in America” sticker.

Unfair trade practice

By fred6666 • • Score: 3 • Thread

Trump would be calling it unfair if the USA was an exporter of WiFi routers and other countries were banning them.

Trump DHS Officials Asked CISA To Secretly Aquire and Hack a Voting Machine

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Longtime Slashdot reader fahrbot-bot shares a report from ProPublica:
A few months into President Donald Trump’s second term, political appointees at the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) wanted Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) to secretly acquire a voting machine and hack it. The appointees wanted the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency to procure the machine, examine it and report back the findings so they could be given to the White House, according to two former administration officials with knowledge of the request.

The proposition was shocking to CISA’s career staffers, according to one of the former officials. CISA typically worked to thwart hackers. Moreover, the agency had been directed not to alert the voting machine company if it uncovered flaws, contrary to its standard practices. The request made the CISA employees fear they were being asked to take part in political interference. “My thought was they could keep it in their back pocket to invalidate any [election] results they don’t like,” one of the former officials said. “This goes against everything CISA represents.” [Or, perhaps do something worse?]

The CISA employees repeatedly told the political appointees that their request was impossible, in part because the agents capable of pulling off such an operation had just been laid off by Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) initiative. The appointees eventually stopped pressing CISA. Though not acted on, the request shows how the Trump administration has tried to use the agency for its own ends while draining it of resources for one of its critical missions: protecting the nation’s voting systems.

Department of Generating Errors.

By Ostracus • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

The fact DOGE unintentionally thwarted their efforts is irony at it’s finest.

Re:Misleading way to phrase this much?

By karmawarrior • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Nope. I knew someone would make this claim, I knew it. I literally had this quote from the summary ready knowing that someone would claim this was just the White House trying to make our elections secure:

> Moreover, the agency had been directed not to alert the voting machine company if it uncovered flaws, contrary to its standard practices. The request made the CISA employees fear they were being asked to take part in political interference. “My thought was they could keep it in their back pocket to invalidate any [election] results they don’t like,” one of the former officials said. “This goes against everything CISA represents.” [Or, perhaps do something worse?]

There is no interpretation of the facts that supports anything other than the White House planning to use this information to hack the election.

Re:“The proposition was shocking”

By F.Ultra • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread
the shocking part was where they where forbidden to share any found vulnerability to the vendor and keep it secret. So, no this is not at all “what security people are supposed to be doing”, this is however exactly what you want to do when you want to stockpile vulnerabilities in order to alter the result yourself.

Re:They could have just read the book

By gweihir • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

I see where you failed there: There is no one in the Trump regime that can read well enough to understand that book.

Re:Misleading way to phrase this much?

By kqs • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Wow, you are really really desperate to de-legitimize elections. Why?

If you had read the post you were responding to: The “paper trail” my county uses is paper ballots which people fill in with pens (fill in the ovals, what fun!) and are then scanned. Those paper ballots are turned in to the county, as are the memory cards containing the scanned data. If there is any question, the county will hand-count the paper ballots, filled out by the voters NOT THE MACHINE.

You should probably ask yourself why you typed a comment that made a vague assertion contradicting a post with precise verifiable details. You may find out something about your opinions and decisions which will be unpleasant (but very important) to face.

A Hacker Broke Into John Deere, SharkNinja With an Army of AI Agents

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Verge:
A hacker broke into more than 100 websites using an army of AI agents that mostly operated on their own, according to findings from the AI security firm Norforge. Though Norforge doesn’t name the targets, Reuters reports that the victims included companies like John Deere, SharkNinja, and Cummins.

[…] Researchers at Norforge uncovered the attacks through exposed work on Cairn, an open-source AI platform that describes itself as a “general-purpose problem-solving engine.” With Cairn, users set a start and end point for the AI agents, which document their progress as they move forward with the task. However, as noted by Norforge, hackers can also use the tool to orchestrate cyberattacks using AI agents.

The hacker who broke into more than 100 sites was the “most active” among the exposed Cairn instances discovered by Norforge, waging attacks on companies based in the US, Canada, Australia, and Japan, as reported by Reuters. This attacker laid out “preferred intrusion tactics” using fewer than 100 Chinese characters, with successful breaches taking about 23 hours, according to Reuters. Overall, Nordforge found more than 20 exposed Cairn instances that are “likely malicious.”
A John Deere spokesperson said there is “no indication that sensitive information was accessed” as a result of the attack, while Cummins said it’s “investigating the report of a potential cyber-attack on a website operated by one of our third-party vendors.”
Meanwhile, SharkNinja says the breach impacted a standalone site with product support information, and that it has contained the threat.

I wouldn’t complain if they leaked service manuals

By afaiktoit • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
Just sayin

“no indication that sensitive information was acce

By darkain • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

“no indication that sensitive information was accessed”

Translation: “We didn’t have proper monitoring in place, so we don’t even know what they did”

Re:Why the fuck

By drinkypoo • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

I suggest reading Bruce Sterling’s Heavy Weather, though as always, the most prophetic Cyberpunk novel remains Neal Stephenson’s Snow Crash. His particular vision of techno-feudalism is rapidly coming true, and it’s just as stupid as he imagined it would be. (Obvs the mystical mind virus stuff is not what I mean here.)

Apple Announces October 28 ‘Pro and Tell’ Event

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Following its October 13 HomeView launch, Apple is gearing up for its second hardware event of the month. The event is scheduled for October 28 in Los Angeles and carries the tagline “Pro and tell.” 9to5Mac reports:
Rumors say Apple has a slew of new products to announce at its next event, headlining by its first MacBook Pro with a touchscreen and OLED. According to Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman, here’s what’s on the docket:

- New 14-inch and 16-inch touchscreen MacBook Pro models with OLED displays. They will also have a Dynamic Island for the first time and will be “significantly lighter” than the current models. The new MacBook Pro models are expected to be powered by the M5 Pro and M5 Max chips.
- A revamped iPad mini with an OLED screen, a “revamped speaker system,” and a relocated FaceTime camera
- New iMac and entry-level 14-inch MacBook Pro models powered by the M6 chip, which will “look like their current versions.”

Rinse and repeat

By Tarlus • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Pretty much since the advent of OSX I’ve observed this pattern.

1) Apple announces a long-rumored feature or product that their competitors have already offered for years.

2) A sizeable and persistent assemblage of anti-Apple neckbeards spend their time berating Apple for playing catch-up. There’s always that guy who has to respond to articles like these with one-line bangers like “magical” or “innovative”.

3) The product releases and demonstrates some kind of refinement - which sets it apart from the competitors - because Apple has taken the time to make it feel like their operating system was designed around the idea. (Not always the case, less so in recent years, but true often enough.) It makes Apple’s take on the idea more novel and appealing to consumers.

4) In subsequent years, competitors mimic Apple’s approach. The neckbeards go silent.

Followed by something involving an ellipsis and a profit.

- Written from an old Dell running Debian

Lighter = More Fragile

By Hadlock • • Score: 3 • Thread

>The new MacBook Pro models are expected to be “significantly lighter” than the current models.
 
This is the exact opposite of what I want. A macbook pro needs to survive a fall from the passenger seat of a chevy suburban (more than 3’ high) onto concrete. Today you get about one drop per corner before the aluminum deforms too much and can’t take the beating and the display breaks. Maybe the new OLED are less prone to cracking. At no time in my life did I look at my work issued MBP and think “I wish this were lighter” particularly the 13/14” models

Phew!

By SigIO • • Score: 3 • Thread

If this event was in Vegas, an event name like that would be trouble.

Florida DMV Hacked After Police Dept Insecurely Stored Login Info

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Florida’s DMV says a September 4 breach exposed driver’s license and motor vehicle records after attackers obtained credentials that a local law-enforcement employee had “improperly stored on an electronic device.” The ShinyHunters group has been linked to the intrusion. Ars Technica reports:
In a notice posted Friday, [Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles (FLHSMV)] confirmed that it took “immediate steps” after discovering that “a malicious actor accessed certain department records on September 4, 2026, using compromised credentials.” There’s “no evidence” that data has yet been misused, the department said, but law enforcement “determined the information potentially affected includes driver license and motor vehicle data, to include document images, and other personal information.”

[…] On a webpage describing the security incident, FLHSMV confirmed that an “international cybercriminal organization” was behind the breach but did not specify which group or how long they had access. Instead, officials claimed to have “promptly mitigated the breach, launched an investigation, and issued required notification to state authorities.” Mitigations included “blocking unauthorized access, resetting relevant user credentials, engaging cybersecurity professionals, and implementing additional safeguards to protect sensitive information,” FLHSMV said. Florida’s investigation is “ongoing,” officials said, but a cybercriminal group called ShinyHunters — which recently claimed credit for hacking the FBI — may have stolen the data.
Florida residents affected by the breach will receive a letter offering one year of free credit monitoring through Sontiq, Inc. Those whose contact information is outdated can email the FLHSMV at customerinquiry@flhsmv.gov to determine whether their data was compromised.

Rules for thee but not for me

By Zondar • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

Where’s the required multi-factor authentication?

Get a printed title for vehicle you own.

By couchslug • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread

DMV lose or delete old title records fairly often. Fortunately I had hard copy titles for all my vintage vehicles so getting one reloaded was not a problem.

When I buy a vehicle I get a hard copy of the title printed on the spot, not mailed to me. I’ve been a mechanic for ~five decades and seen many title problems due to buyers failing to transfer titles then losing their copy (which is the most common error), but don’t count on titles in a DMV system to last forever.

Don’t omit boat and outboard motor titles where applicable. You can avoid much frustration.

Ah the all soothing make it right

By stabiesoft • • Score: 3 • Thread
free year of credit monitoring. I’d like to think everyone affected gets a whack at those responsible. Bring back paddles!

Elon Musk Vows To Give a SpaceX Share To ‘Every Kid In America’

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from CNN:
Elon Musk has said he will give every child in America a stake in SpaceX, his $2 trillion aerospace and artificial intelligence company, as tech firms face intensifying scrutiny over their impact on society. “Next year, I will give one of my SpaceX shares to every kid in America,” he wrote on X on Monday. “This will be the first of many.”

SpaceX only began trading publicly in June (and after the biggest initial public offering in history). The company’s shares were trading for about $146 when the market closed on Friday. Musk’s proposal was thin on detail. It is not clear how those shares would be distributed to the tens of millions of American children or whether all of them would even be eligible. According to the United States Census Bureau, there are roughly 73 million people under the age of 18, making Musk’s potential giveaway worth about $10.7 billion at SpaceX’s current share price.
The move came in response to Anthropic’s announcement on Sunday that it will commit at least 5% of its shares to a “Public Benefit Fund” that will donate money to social causes. “I recommend giving the shares directly to the public,” Musk said in a reply to Anthropic’s announcement. “This is what I will be doing.”

Poll numbers

By ArchieBunker • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

Wow the poll numbers must be pretty bad if he’s resorting to socialism.

Three takeaways

By dirk • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

1) Does anyone really think this will happen? I would put as much faith in this as I do Trump’s $5000 checks in the GOP wins the midterms.
2) Does anyone really think he is going to give away his personal shares? Most likely, if it happens, they would issue 73 millions additional shares (or less as he will find some way to send them to only certain people), thus devalueing not only these new shares, but all the shares.
3) Even if he did give his own shares, that is still a time amount of his wealth. Does anyone really think he would ever even notice this change in wealth? This just shows how incredibly out of touch the uber rich are with regular people. This is about 1% of his net worth. He could give away 50% and it would never be noticed. But because it is a big number, people think this is rich people doing good when it is them doing the minimum for good press.

Re:That’s easier to do

By vux984 • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Its a little tricky too, as children generally don’t have suitable investment accounts that can hold publicly traded shares. I’m doubtful they even legally can open those accounts.

So what are they going to do, issue a gazillion single paper share certificates? What a shitshow that would be, the fees and shipping alone around dealing with that for a single share would be nuts, not to mention the hassle of redeeming them, and the untold numbers that would be misplaced or destroyed. And I’m still not sure children can own them, or sign the agreements required to get them.

What else could the do? Create beneficial trusts for every child? Whose going to administer that? and again the fees and management expenses around it would be nuts all for a $150 space-x share?

It might be reasonable for him to set a bunch aside, and as children reach adulthood, let them claim them at that point.
If the idea is that the kid can’t sell it or whatever until they’re an adult anyway, its probably fine. It’ll be income maybe when they receive it, so that could work out badly for some kids though, if they have to sell it to cover the taxes on it, because they don’t have a job yet. Especially if its appreciated to a couple thousand or something. (How are splits etc handled, do they get one or more? Or worse… reverse splits on a single share?)

Great PR!

By kwerle • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

This is like Trump promising $5K if republicans win the midterms. It’s just a PR stunt.

Imagine trying to reason out the tax implications of something like this. The privacy implications. Everything.

Elon: “I really wanted to, but lawyers wouldn’t let me!”

No way to see that coming.

Re:Poll numbers

By MachineShedFred • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

It’s weapons-grade bullshit.

Oh, he’s going to eat the expense of sending out an 8-digit number of proxy votes now? Every child in America (and their parents as legal guardians) now get a shareholder vote?

This is not happening the same way Trump’s voter bribery checks aren’t happening.

Wine Ported to OpenBSD

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Wine has been successfully ported to OpenBSD, with developers reporting that dozens of 64-bit Windows applications now run on the operating system. “Even the Remaster of The Witcher 3 which released just last month runs, and runs well,” writes Thomas Frohwein, OpenBSD developer and ports maintainer. OSnews reports:
The biggest limitation seems to be the lack of support for WoW64, so 32bit Windows software won’t work. Still, this is a massive milestone for OpenBSD, and makes especially gaming a somewhat viable option on OpenBSD.

Of course!

By Anonymous Coward • • Score: 4, Funny • Thread

I certainly enjoy some port wine when involved with any kind of BDSM activities.

Is it?

By drinkypoo • • Score: 3 • Thread

Still, this is a massive milestone for OpenBSD

Is it, though? The question is whether they are going to implement WOW support or not. There is a little discussion on the linked article about how it either is or isn’t possible. If they are stopping here then it’s not that exciting for most people who want to run Windows programs, because there’s a surprisingly high percentage of 32 bit binaries out there.

Remember this date…

By Valgrus Thunderaxe • • Score: 3 • Thread
Because it’s the day of OpenBSD on the desktop.

Elizabeth Holmes Doc ‘You Can See Everything’ Shocks With Massive Opening

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Nathan Fielder and Lance Oppenheim’s Elizabeth Holmes documentary “You Can See Everything” earned more than $15 million in its limited opening weekend, making it one of the biggest documentary launches in decades and the strongest opening for a film on fewer than 1,000 screens since Borat in 2006. It was also “the biggest non-music documentary since ‘Fahrenheit 9/11’ in 2004,” adds CNN. From the report:
Many weekend screenings in cities like New York and Los Angeles were sold out despite the three-hour running time. The film’s distributor, A24, called it “one of the largest limited-release openings of the 21st century.” “You Can See Everything” opened on fewer than 900 screens following a jaw-dropping surprise premiere at the Telluride Film Festival last month.

Fielder and Oppenheim worked on the project in secret for years, filming with Holmes and her partner Billy Evans in the weeks before Holmes went to prison in 2023. Holmes was convicted of wire fraud and conspiracy to defraud Theranos investors, but she tried to convince the filmmakers of her innocence.

Fielder, who appears on camera interviewing Holmes and Evans, takes the film in unexpected directions, thrilling critics and theatergoers. The film has an extraordinarily high 99% “fresh score” on Rotten Tomatoes and a record-high 4.8 rating on Letterboxd.
Further reading: Will New Documentary Make Theranos Founder Elizabeth Holmes More Sympathetic?

Re:The title sells…

By know-nothing cunt • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

Perhaps the “Massive Opening” of the headline?

Re:The title sells…

By GrimSavant • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

If you want to know where the title comes from:
 
…

It’s from a text message that Elizabeth Holmes sends to Nathan Fielder, shown within the movie.

As you might imagine with Holmes, it is a deeply ironic title.

I saw it a few days ago

By GrimSavant • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

It’s pretty wild, and there is good reason for the hype around it. It’s really stuck in my mind.

It’s a dive into deception and manipulation, and the relationships between some deeply pathological people. Ostensibly it is about the particular scammers depicted and the people making the movie themselves, but there’s a couple moments where you see Toto pulling back the curtain a bit about the grift being more endemic in these Silicon Valley startup types in general.

It is not an entirely conventional documentary. Someone else suggested the category of “meta documentary” (it gets pretty meta), but perhaps it’s a deconstruction of a documentary, or a documentary for a post truth environment? I’m not sure. If you’ve seen other Nathan Fielder works like the Rehearsal the way it goes off the rails will be familiar. And no, the movie does not hide the ball about questions about its objectivity or ethics what the movie is doing itself, it shoves it in your face in downright unsettling ways.

John Carreyrou, the WSJ journalist behind the piece that kicked off the spiraling downfall of Theranos and the most comprehensive chronicler of that fraud, gave You Can See Everything a glowing review.

Re:Fielder in Wired magazine

By Whateverthisis • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
It helped her that her parents worked for the government, the State Department, for many years, as well as Enron (surprise surprise). her family lived next door to Tim Draper, one of the early and more successful silicon valley VCs, and her dad was college friends with Don Lucas, who was also an extremely well known investor in Silicon Valley and he became the first Chairman, and he introduced her to Larry Ellison who also invested.

These things are orchestrated, not led.

Re: Fielder in Wired magazine

By fahrbot-bot • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

She looks like a muppet. You’re just attracted to crazy.

And with her blond hair, she could be the next White House Press Secretary. :-)

America Tries Reviving Shuttered Nuclear Plants - Partly to Help Power Data Centers

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
America is “making an unprecedented attempt to revive three shuttered nuclear plants to meet rising energy demand,” reports the Los Angeles Times,

“Two of the plants have contracts with Big Tech companies that will pay a premium to get large amounts of carbon-free energy for data centers…”
No commercial nuclear reactor is known to have resumed generating electricity after beginning the decommissioning process that takes one out of service, though some reactors have restarted after long outages. The Department of Energy is lending as much as $4.4 billion to restart the Palisades Power Plant in Michigan, the Crane Clean Energy Center on Pennsylvania’s Three Mile Island and the Duane Arnold Energy Center in Iowa to restore a combined 2.25 gigawatts of electricity, which can power roughly 2 million homes and businesses. All three of the plants closed before their licenses expired, largely because the electricity they produced was considered too expensive… Restarting a reactor is a fairly quick way to get a lot of electricity, and it’s cheaper than building a new, large reactor, said nuclear engineering expert Todd Allen…

Edwin Lyman, at the Union of Concerned Scientists, said the taxpayer money being used should go toward addressing safety risks. For example, most U.S. plants were built between 1970 and 1990 and were designed to withstand natural disasters of that era, said Lyman, director of nuclear power safety at UCS. But climate change is making extreme weather events more frequent and severe. “It’s possible, if they set the right level of safety and spend the necessary funds to meet that, they could restore these plants to operable condition,” he said. “That’s not happening at this point....”

NextEra Energy and Google are collaborating to restart Duane Arnold by early 2029… Microsoft has a contract with the Crane Clean Energy Center on Three Mile Island just outside Harrisburg. The plant was the site of the nation’s worst commercial nuclear power accident in 1979. The accident destroyed one reactor, leaving the plant with one functioning. In 2019, Constellation Energy’s then-parent company Exelon shut down the functioning reactor, saying it was losing money and that Pennsylvania lawmakers had refused to subsidize it. Constellation Energy announced in 2024 that it would spend $1.6 billion to restart the reactor under a 20-year agreement with Microsoft. It hopes to bring the plant back online in 2027…

Palisades is expected to be the first nuclear plant in the world to resume generating power after beginning the decommissioning process.

Good side effect

By Gilgaron • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
See at least this could be some good they’d be doing on accident instead of burning a bunch of natural gas for no good reason, and it’ll be useful post bubble.

The Expense Is In The Shutdown And Cleanup

By SlashbotAgent • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

The major expense of a nuclear reactor is in decommissioning, the shutdown and cleanup at it’s retirement. This process can take 20 years itself and require billions of dollars.

Where will that decommissioning money come from? Will it be the rate payers and tax payers as has been in the past? You betcha!

Also… If the reactor was already entering the decommissioning phase, we must assume that it was in bad shape. So now they are going to squeeze another twenty years of use out of a worn out reactor? And then go through a 20 year decommissioning process?

This is going to vastly over-run budgets

By shilly • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

We all know that when you re-wire a house, it costs a shit-ton more than new wiring, because you always run into unexpected issues. That exact problem is going to bite them in the ass here, too: they are going to uncover all kinds of shite they have to deal with, not least because of the radioactivity, temperatures, pressures, corrosive chemicals, etc that are inherent to nuclear power plants.

Palisades is already blowing past its budget and timings estimates for this exact reason: 1,163 steam generator tubes with stress corrosion cracking, way more than expected, leaks in underground water pipes, valves requiring replacement, major turbine refurbishment etc.

Re:it’s brown people doing the hurting

By drinkypoo • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

Hi, I’m a real French woman

Is your name Claude-ia by any chance?

If you want us to believe you’re a real person, post from a known account, not anonymously.

Re: Good side effect

By OrangeTide • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

We’re going to switch our nuclear power plants to be monitored by AI to reduce staffing needs

Mozilla is Calling Out Microsoft for Forcing Edge on Users

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
“Mozilla reps tell me they’ve met with Microsoft about their concerns,” reports PC Magazine, “but that the company wasn’t responsive.”
“They’ll do the minimum the law requires to respect user choice,” explains Kush Amlani, Mozilla’s counsel overseeing global competition and regulatory work… Mozilla recently marked 100 days since it released an 87-page report detailing the ways in which Microsoft pushes Edge on Windows PCs.... One example is how Windows often displays a “Let’s finish setting up your PC” pop-up after an OS update. This screen has an enabled-by-default option to “use recommended browser settings,” which makes Edge the default web browser.

However, that screen doesn’t appear in Europe. European laws now force Microsoft to make Windows more respectful of user choices. For instance, in European countries, the Start menu opens links in your default web browser rather than in Edge, as it does everywhere else. Amlani says Mozilla wants Microsoft to release the European version of Windows to the rest of the world. However, he thinks this will require government action. As he puts it, “Microsoft can do better when it’s forced.”
The last line of the article sums up Mozilla’s main point. “No one should have to fight their OS this hard on something as simple as a browser preference.”

Is this news?

By commodore73 • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
I think this would only be news if Microsoft or some government entity were to do something about it. Otherwise, it just seems like the same old headline that’s been haunting us as long as Microsoft has existed - Microsoft abuses its users to harm competition. That being said, I actually thought edge was a decent browser, but that was years ago when I still used Windows. As a veteran .NET programmer that actually loved Microsoft Office, Windows 11 was just more abuse than I could take.

Re:Is this news?

By sg_oneill • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

The problem is, Microsoft addresses the Edge concerns by saying “But Edge isn’t in a monopoly position. Chrome is still more popular”. But when it does that it wants you to ignore what got in trouble the first time around.

Back in the 90s/early 2000s , Microsoft didn’t get so badly busted that it almost got split apart by the regulators because IE was a monopoly. Microsoft got in trouble because it abused its windows monopoly to illegally obtain its browser monopoly at the expense of Netscape.

Its doing the *exact* same thing again. I am seeing countless, mostly elderly, folks using Edge because they dont know how to convince windows to let them use chrome by default. Its actually harder to find those defaults than it was back in the 90s/early 2000s.

Its just they are brazen about it now, becuase they know the current admin wont go after them, for the same reason George Bush ordered the justice department to stop going after microsoft back in the day.

Which won’t make a lick of difference to the EU, if it decides it wants to impose silly-money fines again. But the EU can only regulate EU business, so microsoft is playing different rules.

So we should ask ourselves, why do europeans get a choice and not us.

Not just the browser

By quonset • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Microsoft tries its best to force you to use Edge to open a pdf. If I have Adobe Reader set as my default pdf reader, that should be the end of it. Nope. Certain updates have reverted to using Edge so I, and others at my place of work, have to go in and reset the default.

Once someone has something set as their default, it should never be tampered with unless it’s done by the user.

more like Microsoft and Google than ever

By metac0rtex • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
I had to setup a fresh Firefox profile a few days back and I was astonished by how many user-hostile checkboxes that I had to uncheck. AI, sponsors in home page, firefox studies, un-removable search engines, malware protection that sends every site that I visit to google, the list is just endless. After all of that I still have to dive into about:config to find and disable at least a half-dozen other opt-out features. The whole thing feels exactly like the endless hoops that one has to jump through when installing Windows or using Edge or Chrome. I used to choose Firefox because Mozilla felt like a much more user-friendly option. I am not sure that this is still the case.

Re:Use Rufus

By slaker • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

The thing you are looking for is the Group Policy Editor. There are Group Policies that can disable the prompts to use Microsoft accounts and the ability to use OneDrive or Windows AI features, the hook Bing has in Windows Search (i.e. no more searching in the start menu and having it list web sites before the file or application you wanted) and all the “consumer experience” features in non-Enterprise Windows. There are a few GPO settings that get ignored unless you’re on Windows Enterprise or Education. Most of them related to Microsoft Datamining.

It is also possible to transition a Microsoft account back to a local one without losing your Profile. This is done in Settings > Accounts > Your Info in Windows 11.

gpedit.msc is normally only available to non-Home Windows SKUs, but it is unlockable with a tiny bit of Powershell:

Get-ChildItem @(
        “C:\Windows\servicing\Packages\Microsoft-Windows-GroupPolicy-ClientTools-Package*.mum”,
        “C:\Windows\servicing\Packages\Microsoft-Windows-GroupPolicy-ClientExtensions-Package*.mum”
) | ForEach-Object { dism.exe /online /norestart /add-package:"$_” }

Open an Administror-elevated Powershell or Terminal session, paste that in and even your $200 Acer vomit-grade notebook can work the way you want it again.

The reason we need GPOs for this stuff is that Microsoft’s software updates will occasionally re-set registry changes. If the changes are made with GPOs, the settings get reapplied and overwrite changes no matter what state Windows is in. This is particularly annoying for stuff like OneDrive, CoPilot and Edge preferences. You either have to regularly re-run scripts to alter the registry to the state you like it and hope nothing makes a structural change to where those settings live, or you set a GPO.

Anthropic Announces ‘Public Benefit Fund’, Committing 5% of Its Shares

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
“Anthropic says it’s committing 5% of its shares to a ‘public benefit fund’,” reports TechCrunch, “structured as a wholly-owned entity within the company — with the option to contribute an additional 2% for every 50% increase in Anthropic’s value.”

Important context from CNBC:
The timing of Anthropic’s public fund announcement is both mandatory to prepare for an initial public offering, and “beneficial from an image perspective,” especially as AI reshapes the jobs market, Lise Buyer, partner at IPO advisory firm Class V Group, told CNBC…

Anthropic said it will share more about the fund structure and governance in the coming months, including valuation milestones that may increase the stake. It said it will also share progress on the fund in an upcoming public benefit report. In response to Anthropic’s announcement, Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk said on X that he “recommend[s] giving the shares directly to the public.”
Anthropic’s announcement hints the fund could address job-market displacements. It says the fund “might” explore “large donations to traditional nonprofits” — or, that it “might” explore “direct distributions to specific populations. One example is labor market impacts.”

It then argues AI could “cause instability” for many workers. And while Anthropic has already committed $200 million for “studying and addressing” this issue, Sunday’s announcement says “bolder” approaches may be needed, and that the Fund “will have the versatility to pursue them.”

“Combined with its co-founders’ pledge to donate 80% of their equity and an employee donation matching program, roughly 20% of Anthropic’s shares will be dedicated to public purposes,” reports Reuters, “excluding any additional shares added later.”

We found a tax break!

By locater16 • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread
And how to turn our tax break into a PR release!!

A Public Benefit Fund is a Slush Fund

By drnb • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
A Public Benefit Fund (PBF) is a Slush Fund that allows a company to spend money on stuff that does not enhance shareholder value. Its a legal technique to avoid doing what is profitable. Anthropic gets to define whatever the “public benefit” is, and divert shareholder money to it, and shareholders cannot do a damn thing about it. Its a way to fund pet projects of executives without any oversight.

Sure a PBC (Corporation) or PBF can actually do good, but despite the name it does not have to. “Good” is only in the eyes of those who created the PBF or PBC.

I’ve watched that shit for 20 years with MSFT

By T34L • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
Grew up in one of the many countries where Microsoft “paid for” so very much of school equipment, and all that amazing “free” gear cost the schools was curriculum conveniently teaching exclusively use of Microsoft OS and complete office suite. I’m looking towards the “public benefit fund” wholly dedicated to nurturing the public impression that all these elusive jobs are one free retraining making you a loyal Anthropic user away. I’ve eaten many a “free” lunch over the course of my life and, as a paying Anthropic customer, I’d not feed anything they hand out for the “public benefit” to my dog, or any other living being I’d care about the welfare of.

funds

By awwshit • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

> direct distributions to specific populations

Let me guess, a legal fund for jailed AI Executives?

Re:We found a tax break! (No, we didn’t!)

By Rei • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

Reality: No. They’re forming a wholly-owned LLC, not a 501(c)(3) charity. They’re treated as a disregarded entity for tax purposes. Transferring shares from Anthropic to the new LLC is just moving money from Anthropic’s left pocket to its right pocket. You don’t get a tax deduction from that. To get a deduction from IRC 170, you have to make an irrevocable transfer to a qualified 501(c)(3) charity.

If Anthropic later donates from this LLC to actual charities, it could then claim a corporate charitable deduction (against up to 10% of their profits - and note that word, profits; also, there’s no breaks for UBI programs targeted at individuals). But the formation of this entity and transfer of 5% of their shares to it does not give them any sort of a tax break whatsoever, and there’s no difference between donating from this structure to a charity and donating directly from Anthropic. In fact, by forming this structure, they’re skipping a potential tax break that they could get by forming and donating to a 501(c)(3) upfront.

(If your next question is “why not a 501(c)(3), then?”, the answer is because there’s all sorts of IRS restrictions on 501(c)(3)s, including distributing at least 5% of assets annually, excise taxes on investment gains, strict limits on cash transfers to individuals, etc)

I get that it’s popular for mod points to be cynical, but at least focus your cynicism on factuality. Try this: “We found a PR cheat! And how to turn things our CEO wants to do anyway and might not do until many years from now into a pre-IPO press release!”

‘Human Vs. Robot’ Cage Match Was Illegal, Says California

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
“A human defeated two of the three robots he faced in a cage fight recently held in San Francisco,” reports the Los Angeles Times, noting that videos of the event drew more than 10 million views on YouTube.

But “the humans behind that fight could face a battle of their own — the legal type — if they want to hold another event like ‘Human Vs. Robot,’ the Sept. 18 competition that placed influencer Frankie LaPenna inside an octagon to battle three humanoid robots that were controlled remotely by a human operator in separate MMA-style fights…”
Wearing spiked gloves, a helmet and protective padding, the 5-foot-6, 205-pound LaPenna held his own against all three bots. He dominated his first opponent, referred to at the fight as "the child robot.” Next came an imposing "Terminator”-inspired humanoid, which was listed on the fight video as 6-feet and 200 pounds with a kick force of 850 pounds. The robot landed several hard kicks, including one that knocked LaPenna across the mat and another with an impact that brought the humanoid to the ground and caused its head to come off — but the human seemed to gain strength as the match went on and eventually stood triumphantly with his foot on the machine’s crumpled body.

LaPenna was dominant early in his final match, in which he faced a robot that resembled a “Predator” from the movies of the same name. After landing several punches and kicks and taking his opponent to the ground multiple times, LaPenna eventually became fatigued and called for the match to be ended. “He doesn’t get tired. He doesn’t stay down,” LaPenna said in a postmatch interview.
“The crowd of about 100 (humans, not humanoids) was thrilled,” writes the New York Times. (After beating his first robot opponent, LaPenna told his interviewer, “Clankers zero, humans one.”)

But the New York Times adds that “Those who know humanoid robots best highly recommend against fighting them.”
“It’s very unfair to put a human in with a heavily motorized system that’s only going to dominate,” said Ken Goldberg, a professor who oversees the automation lab at the University of California, Berkeley. “There’s nothing surprising about that....” He said he understood the appeal of the fights that Robot Entertainment Kombat (REK) was staging, noting that it tapped “into some of the fear and frustration with robots that people feel.... I mean, they love to see the human kick the robot’s gearbox,” he said. But the odds of that human fighter getting his gearbox kicked are much greater, Dr. Goldberg said, given that REK’s humanoid robots can weigh several hundred pounds and are made of steel.
To be fair, it looked like sometimes the robot just fell over. (And the robots were human-controlled, not programmed with split-second reactions…)

But “Not everyone is a fan,” adds the Los Angeles Times:
On Sept. 23, the California State Athletic Commission sent a cease-and-desist order to REK, its CEO Cix Liv and “all persons holding, promoting, advertising or sponsoring unsanctioned human versus humanoid robot cage fight.” The letter states that “any boxing or mixed martial arts contest, match, or exhibition, involving any human in the State of California” requires the prior approval of the commission and that it is a misdemeanor to hold such an event without obtaining a license or permit from the state. A spokesperson for the California Department of Consumer Affairs, which oversees the CSAC, said in a statement emailed to The Times that the commission is “committed to protecting the safety of the public and integrity of combat sports.”

“Unsanctioned activity puts the physical and financial well-being of all those involved at risk and such activity will not be tolerated,” the statement said.

Okay, but

By 93 Escort Wagon • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

How would he do against The Crushinator - or Destructo?

Re:Okay, but

By 93 Escort Wagon • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

More seriously… I decided to watch the video of the guy against that “Terminator” non-autonomous robot. Just about everything the guy did had ZERO effect on the robot. The robot’s attacks, on the other hand, were clearly dominant. But the robot fell over on its own, twice… and after the second fall the guy just walked over and declared “victory”. It was pretty bogus.

Not sure what’s meant to be demonstrated here

By Jeremi • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

It’s perfectly possible to build a machine that will incapacitate a human at close range; all of the world’s militaries have been doing it for years.

It’s also possible to deliberately dial down the machine’s combat effectiveness to the point where a fight against a human might not be a foregone conclusion.

OTOH, having done the latter, what have we learned? That we can design and build a robot that we nerfed just enough that it usually loses in hand-to-hand combat?

Re:Not sure what’s meant to be demonstrated here

By T34L • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Not sure what’s meant to be demonstrated here

The extremely unsurprising excitement of AI boosters to see a person beat up by an anthropomorphic robot.

I’m jus’ a simple country engineer

By RightwingNutjob • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

but don’t a “boxing match” need *two* opponents?

Legally, isn’t just livestreaming a workout with *very* specialized exercise equipment?

New Video Game Law Proposed: ‘If You Pay For It, You Own It’

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot
“When you pay for a game, you should own it,” says U.S. Representative Ritchie Torres (D-NY), introducing a new bill to fight the practice of “a rental disguised as a sale”.

Kotaku reports:
The fifth best-selling game of 2024 in the U.S. was NBA 2K25. Every year, fans dump hundreds of hours and hundreds of dollars into the grindy NBA basketball sim. But just a little over two years after its release, 2K Games confirmed it’s already pulling the plug on it. The game will be delisted from digital storefronts on October 30. By January 1, 2027, online servers will go offline as well, making it impossible to play the most popular modes. A game millions paid $70 for will become mostly useless. Democratic Congressman Ritchie Torres wants to change that.

“I think there should be a simple rule: if you pay for it, you own it,” Torres told Kotaku in a phone interview this week. To make that the law of the land, the U.S. representative for New York’s 15th congressional district since 2021 plans to introduce legislation in Congress called the Power To The Players Act. The bill would direct the Federal Trade Commission to create regulations protecting ownership rights for video games. Companies selling digital games would need to grant players more than just a license that can expire at any time, and games with online features would need to provide offline modes that still work even when servers eventually shut down…

The Power To The Players Act noticeably leaves out other types of digital media like movies and music, though Terminator 2 and a bunch of other movie purchases were ripped from people’s digital libraries earlier this year.
Representative Torres “did not confirm if the bill will have any cosponsors,” the article acknowledges, “or whether any of his Republican colleagues will sign on to support it.”

But players will see the bill’s importance next month, the article points out, “when Grand Theft Auto 6 releases as just a download code in a box, giving fans no control over a purchase that starts at $80.

Re:“if you pay for it, you own it”

By Rei • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

In Europe, it is. Article 6 of the Software Directive grants an “interoperability exemption”. The lawful licensee of software has the statutory right to strip DRM in order to achieve interoperability. Any EULA terms that prohibit reverse engineering for interoperability are automatically treated as void. Article 5(1) of Directive 2009/24/EC also grants the ability to decompile to fix bugs that impair the ability to use the software, even if the supplier prohibits it. So long as you don’t then start sharing your “offline mode” version of the software, you’re within your rights

People in Europe are within their rights to task an AI to decompile and tweak a game they own make an “offline mode” version of it, or to create their own servers or whatnot if the manufacturer plans to shut them down or otherwise strip features that the user paid for.

Of course, the US is less consumer-friendly in this regard.

Re:“if you pay for it, you own it”

By Rei • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

BTW, this also applies to old games. Have an old game that no longer runs on modern operating systems? In Europe, you have the right to task an AI to fix it so it will run.

Adding *new features*, mind you, is trickier. You’re not allowed to decompile and alter a program to add new features, but you *are* allowed to decompile for interoperability purposes. So you are within your rights to task an AI to decompile a program to figure out how to link a mod into it and then to write a mod.

It must suck to wake up everyday and be so wrong

By rsilvergun • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
You could just Google this.

So yes initially the Clinton administration wanted back doors in encryption software. After a lot of backlash and several science researchers explaining to the administration rather calmly that it would never work the administration didn’t about face and stop supporting and calling for the back doors.

This is more or less how it’s supposed to work. Administrative types suggest something, science types take a look, science types either find that it’s a good idea or it’s a bad idea. Administrative types listen to the science types and that’s that.

This is exactly what happened with the Clinton administration. They came up with a stupid fucking idea which to be fair they should have known was stupid in the first place but they are administrative types not science types. The science types explain to the administrative types why it was a terrible idea. And in this case the administrative types being Democrats listened to the science types.

Meanwhile the entire Republican party is telling you that vaccines cause autism and miscarriages. I especially like the miscarriage one because Joe Rogan went around pushing it to morons and the statistic being thrown about was vaccinated women had an 80% miscarriage rate, which was true as long as you ignored the fact that it was in the first trimester and only counted pregnancies to finished in that. Of time and yeah no fucking shit completed pregnancies in the first trimester often miscarry…

The Republican party does not listen when scientists speak. The Democrat party does. If you give a shit about encryption or vaccines or science or reality you vote blue.

Now it’s possible you’re innocent in all this and not just taking pot shots at Clinton because he’s not on your team. If that’s the case you need to stop and ask who told you that Bill Clinton opposed encryption because whoever told that to you was lying in the exact same way that the people telling you that vaccines cause miscarriage 80% of the time. And you need to start getting angry at the people who are lying to you. Because it’s not the Democrats.

On the other hand if you’re just taking pot shots because he’s not on your team that will backfire on you eventually when the Republicans collapse the economy yet again. But you’re probably going to double down because you’re in too deep… So maybe someday you’ll get tired of being lied to. Good luck

Re:“if you pay for it, you own it”

By tlhIngan • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

Why did this Mr. Torres (Democrat from NY — That part is important) leave this out? Is it because the film industry is all democrat and the tech industry is libertarian? Can’t be.

Or maybe because it isn’t needed? Movies and music are available in a format you own.

For music - they’re basically all DRM free so you buy it you own it. You can also buy it on CD, vinyl, cassette tape or other formats.

For movies, well, you can still buy DVDs and Blu-Rays, and you buy those you own them.

For videogames, other than GoG, that doesn’t exist. You buy PC games with the courtesy from Valve/Steam, Epic, Microsoft, Sony, etc. If they say you aren’t allowed to play the game anymore, they can block you from playing it.

But with my CDs, purchased music, DVDs and Blu-Rays, no one can prevent me from watching it.

Mandate ability to host independent servers

By couchslug • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

If a game is discontinued that’s no reason to deprive the willing of ability to host their own servers.

That option adds value long after a company ends support. It’s a feature not a barrier to profit.