Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Trump Administration Bans New Chinese Humanoid Robots
  2. Workplaces Look For Cheaper AI As ‘Tokenmaxxing’ Fades As a Corporate Fad
  3. Apple Retires iPhone Upgrade Program For Klarna-Backed Leases
  4. AI-Found Bugs Aren’t Proving Any Easier to Exploit Despite the Hype
  5. eBay Reaches $56 Million Settlement With E-Commerce Newsletter Writers It Terrorized In 2019
  6. Anthropic AI Model Finds Flaws in Tough-to-Crack Encryption Algorithms
  7. Judge Blocks First State Law That Would Have Banned Prediction Markets
  8. DEF CON Bans Meta-Style ‘Pervert Glasses’
  9. GrapheneOS Defends Data-Wiping Function That Blocked US Border Search
  10. Review Roundup: Framework Laptop 13 Pro
  11. Tons of Peoples’ Claude Chats and Creations Are Exposed On Google
  12. Arizona State Launches Influencer Degree Where Students Must Gain Real Followers
  13. Earth’s Biggest Disasters Strike In a Hidden Pattern Every 27 Million Years
  14. A Missing Underscore Sent Innocent Man To Prison For 18 Months
  15. Peacock to Be Included With YouTube Premium In Major Streaming Tie-Up

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Trump Administration Bans New Chinese Humanoid Robots

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
The Trump administration has banned newly authorized foreign-made humanoid and four-legged robots, along with power inverters, citing “unacceptable risks” to the country’s national security. FCC chairman Brendan Carr said the agency was doing its part “to secure America’s critical supply chains.” The BBC reports:
The FCC has added the items to its Covered List — a register of goods and services that are deemed a risk to US national security. The ban applies to new foreign-produced advanced robotic devices and power inverters and does not prevent the sale or import of any existing models that had been previously authorized by the FCC.

The FCC cited concerns that the use of foreign-made inverters could allow overseas firms to turn them off, steal data, facilitate remote access and surveillance by “foreign government actors, or be otherwise exploited through a cyberattack.” It added that the use of robots made outside the US could allow “malign actors to surveil Americans, enhance the capabilities of foreign intelligence services, or to remotely commandeer the robots.”

Enron Husk desperate to stop the stock freefall

By T34L • Score: 5, Funny Thread
Also, it’s a real shame it’s impossible to design a power inverter without any complex logic or arbitrary data links. I imagine they can’t flip those electrons back and forth without maintaining a lively chat with the mothership.

Please let in one last batch …

By Alain Williams • Score: 4, Informative Thread

to replace Trump and his cronies. It would be very hard for them to do a worse job.

Workplaces Look For Cheaper AI As ‘Tokenmaxxing’ Fades As a Corporate Fad

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from the Associated Press:
A corporate fad of “tokenmaxxing” on artificial intelligence technology is hitting its limits as workplaces throwing AI at everything are seeing the costs rise without a similar spike in productivity. What started as tech industry-fueled springtime hype over squeezing as much AI-generated work as possible out of products like OpenAI’s ChatGPT and Anthropic’s Claude has shifted to a summertime backlash. […] Just a few months ago, Silicon Valley executives were promoting high token consumption as a signal of high-performing employees. The stereotypical tokenmaxxer was staying up late — perhaps ignoring their significant other — while orchestrating an army of 24-hour AI agents performing work on their behalf. […] The trend boosted revenue for leading AI large language model developers like Anthropic and OpenAI, but it fizzled as it became apparent it wasn’t necessarily the best strategy for everyone else.

[…] Bain & Company management consultant Jue Wang said many of the big businesses her firm advises have been taking a closer look at returns on their AI investments. “The token cost for them has been doubling, almost every other month,” she said. “Let’s say $200 per developer per month. Multiply that by 20,000 developers, which is often what we’re dealing with at these companies, and that quickly gets you to a number that is not a line item that any general manager has planned for.” Sometimes that just means not using the AI equivalent of a sledgehammer to crack a nut. “Not everything needs a Claude Opus 4.6,” she said of one of Anthropic’s more capable models suited to software engineering or deep research. “And yet you see so many companies, so many users, default to using Opus for everything, including generating emails.” That’s led to a search for tools that do AI “model routing” — in which easier queries get automatically sent to cheaper and more efficient AI systems and more complex tasks go to more powerful models.

[…] At the same time, those who favor racking up as many tokens as possible are having a field day with new open-source models from Chinese startups like Moonshot’s Kimi or Zhipu’s GLM, which nearly match the capabilities of top U.S. models at a fraction of the price. “There is some validity to the theory that this could push tokenmaxxing a little bit further,” said Raffi Krikorian, the chief technology officer at Mozilla. “But if we look at the industry overall, I think it’s realizing that tokenmaxxing is a dumb thing.” It’s similar, Krikorian said, to how software companies once considered how many lines of code a programmer wrote to be a good metric of productivity. That later fell out of favor. “I think tokenmaxxing is moving through the exact same pattern,” he said. “I think this is going to be an interesting blip that we’re all going to look back to laugh at in a year.”

The only thing I find it genuinely useful for

By rsilvergun • Score: 3 Thread
Is that Google search has gotten so crap-tastic that I can use AI to cut through the crap.

From what I understand if you put a bunch of time into learning how to prompt it it can generate mostly workable code. I find when I ask it to generate code though the code inevitably has a few mistakes and bugs. And with some of the Python code I’ve worked on porting from version 2 to 3 it gives you some of the most bizarre code I’ve ever seen. Like a mishmash between the two versions. The default python conversion tool handles most stuff anyway so I was only really hoping the AI would handle the handful of things it doesn’t but no dice.

On the other hand if you don’t know how to program I suppose it could be useful. And I’ve seen some people do impressive things in the retro game programming hobby. Supposably the guy working on the mortal Kombat 2 3DO Port used AI to Port some of the arcade code over to the 3DO. Ironically it was the code for controlling the computer AI

Of course the last thing you would want for a port of mortal Kombat 2 is arcade accurate ai. Mortal Kombat 2s AI was the cheapest and shittiest imaginable

Wait

By CAIMLAS • Score: 3 Thread

Wait… you mean there were actually people trying to use as many tokens as possible?

It’s one thing to try to exhaust a usage quota (which has never been difficult) because it’s a subsidized commodity. It’s another thing entirely to just burn tokens.

How can a CEO say stupid shit like this? Oh right. CEO brain.

Dogbert’s Playbook

By jargonburn • Score: 3 Thread
“If you read Dogbert’s book, you’d know that a fast-growing company always loses money while it’s expanding.”
“We’re not a fast-growing company.”
“And we never will be if we don’t lose more money!”

Apple Retires iPhone Upgrade Program For Klarna-Backed Leases

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Apple has replaced its iPhone Upgrade Program with Apple Upgrade, a Klarna-backed U.S. leasing service covering most iPhones, iPads, Macs, and Apple Watches. MacRumors reports:
Apple Upgrade has lower base prices than the iPhone Upgrade Program, with iPhones available starting at $17.99 per month and the Apple Watch available starting at $11.99 per month. Macs can be leased starting at $24.99 per month, and iPads start at $11.99 per month. AppleCare+ is optional and not included in the lease price, with customers also able to opt for AppleCare One. There are 12-month and 24-month leasing options for the iPhone and Apple Watch, along with 24-month and 36-month leasing options for the Mac and iPad. Lease cost varies based on device, and is lower with a device trade-in that’s applied on a monthly basis. […]

When leasing an iPhone, customers are required to choose a plan from AT&T, Verizon, or T-Mobile, and prepaid plans are not eligible. iPhones need to be leased with a carrier plan, but the iPhones are unlocked so customers can switch carriers if desired. MVNOs like Mint Mobile or Visible are not supported. At the end of the leasing period, customers can choose to return the device and exit the program, pay off the remaining amount owed on the device with a one-time payment and keep it, or return it and upgrade to a new device with a new lease.

The payoff amount is the difference between what was paid during the leasing period and the retail price of the device, minus any remaining trade-in credits. Klarna is not charging a fee for the leasing program, so an iPhone that’s $1,099 can be leased and then purchased for $1,099 with no extra cost beyond taxes. As with trade-ins, Apple will send a pre-labeled and prepaid shipping box for device returns or upgrades. If you don’t opt to pay the purchase fee at the end of the leasing program, you will not own the device and must return it.
Last week, after Bloomberg reported on Apple’s upcoming leasing program, 9to5Mac uncovered code in the iOS 27 beta suggesting the company was developing a system that could restrict leased iPhones when customers fall behind on payments. Apple has now told The Verge that the new “Restricted Mode” will not be activated in response to a missed lease payment. What the new system is actually meant for remains unclear.

Re:Who’s Klarna

By r1348 • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Swedish buy now, pay later scheme.

Re:I remember when the phone companies

By Xenx • Score: 5, Informative Thread
The problem then was the lack of choice in the matter. If you wanted a landline, you had to lease the phone from them. I’m not going to try to dissuade you of feeling that this is also predatory, as it can be. It’s just for other reasons, and ultimately avoidable if one wishes.

One more step....

By LazLong • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

One more step towards the future business wants us all to inhabit, when you’ll own nothing and you’ll be thankful to have found a way to access whatever it is. Frak ‘em.

Re:Who’s Klarna

By Powercntrl • Score: 4, Funny Thread

Swedish buy now, pay later scheme.

But will the iPhone come disassembled in two cardboard boxes with a set of perplexing instructions?

Re:Who’s Klarna

By Uldis Segliņš • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
I find these Ikea jokes funny. But I never understood why such have started at all. Ikea boxes and manuals are superb examples of thoughtful engineering. Never have I ever had any issues.If you can’t do a shelf with such instructions, what job in today’s world is suitable for you? What can you do? Not much. Following such instructions is 4th grade playful Lego assembly joy for adults. If you can’t do that, you have no place even in a construction site, where buildings get assembled with a bit less clear instructions. Shame. I don’t care, mod me down, had to say it.

AI-Found Bugs Aren’t Proving Any Easier to Exploit Despite the Hype

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
AI-assisted vulnerability discovery has yet to produce the expected surge in real-world attacks: VulnCheck found that only 14 of 1,061 attributed discoveries, or 1.3 percent, had been exploited, which is “almost identical to the rate across all vulnerabilities in VulnCheck’s dataset,” reports The Register. “That’s a far cry from the narrative that frontier AI is dramatically tilting the balance in attackers’ favor by churning out instantly weaponizable bugs.” The findings suggest AI is currently better at increasing the volume of bugs found than making them easier to weaponize. From the report:
The report takes particular aim at Anthropic’s much-publicized Project Glasswing, unveiled in April with warnings that AI-assisted vulnerability discovery could allow attackers to hijack systems, disrupt operations, or steal data. Claude Mythos may have identified 23,019 vulnerability candidates, but there’s remarkably little public evidence showing what became of most of them. VulnCheck notes that only 126 have been published as CVEs, that just one has been confirmed exploited in the wild, and that Anthropic’s public disclosure record has seen little movement since Project Glasswing launched.

But that doesn’t mean AI-assisted vulnerability research has failed, according to Patrick Garrity, security researcher at VulnCheck. “AI-assisted vulnerability discovery clearly has value for both attackers and defenders,” Garrity wrote. “The data does not suggest that AI-discovered vulnerabilities are inherently more likely to be exploited than those found through traditional methods.” Instead, he argues, AI is simply helping researchers discover more flaws, giving defenders an opportunity to patch them before criminals get there.

Garrity stopped well short of declaring the threat overblown forever, but he did suggest some of the rhetoric has outpaced reality. “The data so far, including Anthropic’s own stalled disclosure ledger, suggests that AI-assisted vulnerability discovery and frontier capabilities have been overhyped relative to the evidence available today,” he wrote. “That doesn’t mean the risk is imaginary. It means the impact has been real but modest.”

And?

By Gravis Zero • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The most sophisticated hacks link together several small vulnerabilities before they ultimately break security. Just because it cannot be exploited on it’s own doesn’t mean it cannot be used as part of an exploit chain.

Government based attackers

By gurps_npc • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The AI bug finder is not particularly helpful to most criminals. It is a relatively expensive way to find lots of small bugs.

But if a nation state decides to invest a few 100 million dollars, it can find enough of these things to plan a cyber assault around them.

That is the real fear from AI bug finding.

Still needs to be fixed

By sziring • Score: 3 Thread

They still need to be fixed.

Strange framing

By WaffleMonster • Score: 3 Thread

“In research shared with The Register, VulnCheck analyzed 1,061 publicly attributed AI-assisted vulnerability discoveries from Anthropic’s Project Glasswing and the Berkeley Vulnerability Research Initiative, then cross-referenced them against its Known Exploited Vulnerability (KEV) database.

The result: just 14 vulnerabilities, or 1.3 percent, have been confirmed as exploited in the wild, almost identical to the rate across all vulnerabilities in VulnCheck’s dataset.”

“That’s a far cry from the narrative that frontier AI is dramatically tilting the balance in attackers’ favor by churning out instantly weaponizable bugs. Instead, the data suggests that AI is currently better at increasing the volume of vulnerabilities researchers can uncover than at increasing the proportion that attackers actually exploit.”

Three seemingly obvious points…

1. Why would anyone think the proportion of exploitable vulnerabilities would change?

2. Why is this metric even relevant in the first place? If you have a magic genie that can turn out large volumes of vulnerabilities even if the proportion of exploitable bugs are the same you are still in absolute terms finding more exploitable bugs.

3. Any useful bug finding software will obviously be leveraged by both defenders and attackers. Many organizations have already worked AI bug checking into their process. The only difference may be an initial rush/window of time for one side or another. Would expect it to be quite small given everyone has more or less the same access to the same capabilities.

eBay Reaches $56 Million Settlement With E-Commerce Newsletter Writers It Terrorized In 2019

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
eBay and several former executives have agreed to pay $56 million to Ina and David Steiner, the newsletter writers targeted in a 2019 corporate harassment campaign that involved threats, surveillance attempts, and deliveries of live insects and other disturbing items. The settlement closes the couple’s civil case after seven former employees pleaded guilty to criminal charges related to the scheme. TechCrunch reports:
Ina and David Steiner, a married couple and the co-authors of EcommerceBytes, inspired the ire of high-level eBay executives after occasionally criticizing the company in their newsletter. In 2019, a plot was concocted to intimidate the couple into halting their negative coverage. Executives used sock puppet social media accounts to harass the couple, while also sending them anonymous threatening letters and bizarre items in the mail — including live spiders and cockroaches, pornographic magazines, a bloody pig mask, a funereal wreath, and a book about surviving the death of a spouse. According to previously released court documents, a plan that was attempted but never successfully carried out involved affixing a GPS tracking device to the couple’s car. Yet another internally broached plan involved sending a “Samoan gang” to the Steiners’ home.

The settlement this week resolves a 2021 civil case brought by the couple against eBay. The law office representing the Steiners writes that the settlement includes $46.15 million paid to the couple by eBay itself, as well as $2 million from former eBay executive CEO Devin Wenig. Additionally, $500,000 will be paid out to the couple from former eBay executive Wendy Jones, as well as $50,000 from former eBay executive Steve Wymer. Additional funds are being paid to various non-profits. In 2022, seven former eBay employees were criminally charged and pled guilty in relation to the plot, including the company’s former security chief, James Baugh — who was sentenced to nearly five years in prison. Others indicted by the U.S. Department of Justice include David Harville, Brian Gilbert, Stephanie Popp, Stephanie Stockwell, Philip Cooke, and former eBay contractor Veronica Zea.

Wait…

By Locke2005 • Score: 3, Interesting Thread
No RICO indictments against EBay??? ‘Cause that sounds like exactly what a wanna-be mobster like Fat Donny would do to his imagined “enemies”.

The evidence

By Okian Warrior • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Had a look at the criminal complaint just to find out where the perpetrators had gone wrong.

Sending anonymous tweets and E-mails, they purchased pre-paid debit cards to send packages to their home, various harassment techniques such as ordering a pizza “pay on delivery” at 4:30 AM, and so on and so on… how on Earth did the NPD ever figure this out?

Turns out the perpetrators flew from California to Boston area (Natick) to put a GPS on the Steiners’ car, which they couldn’t do because it was kept in a locked garage, so they rented vehicles to surveil the Steiners, their license plates were noted and given to Natick Police Department (NPD), and the rental agency was contacted.

Once the eBay operatives were identified, they tried various misdirects and obfustication techniques, but NPD a) verified their statements, and so figured out they were lying, and b) contacted eBay directly, which had a security team respond in good faith, and the whole plan unravelled.

One, single mistake is all that stood between a long campaign of harassment and getting found out. One good local police department who took the trouble to look deeply into the problem and figure out the truth despite a torrent of misdirection and obfustication.

I wonder how many more campaigns of harassment are ongoing, led by people who know how to conduct vehicle-based surveillance, or encouraged by ineffective or lazy policing.

Bullies…

By jenningsthecat • Score: 3 Thread

… inspired the ire of high-level eBay executives after occasionally criticizing the company in their newsletter. In 2019, a plot was concocted to intimidate the couple into halting their negative coverage.

How is it that these supposed captains of commerce can be so thin-skinned? For people who pride themselves on being tough they sure do a lot of punching down from their lofty perches! And they’re too clueless - even in a PR sense - to realize that shit like this does their rep more harm than any third-party criticism could.

Additionally, if your enterprise is so fucking vulnerable to criticism then maybe you should, you know, put some money and effort into making it better, instead of trying to silence the critics.

I am getting so sick of vicious, anti-social fucktards like these. It’s said that “cream and bastards rise”; I’m seeing lots of bastards these days, but precious little cream …

Holy Shit!

By SlashbotAgent • Score: 4, Informative Thread

This story reads like a bad movie plot. If they hadn’t already proved it in court I would never have believed the story.

It’s shocking and terrifying that a major corporation would go on a personal vendetta like this. I’m glad the perpetrators went to prison and I’m happy for the victims to receive their pay day.

Still unbelievable.

This whole thing is wild…

By barc0001 • Score: 3 Thread

I heard about this a couple of years ago when the court case was still going on, the podcast Behind the Bastards did a 2 parter on it, and it’s just absolutely *weird* that anyone at eBay gave two shits about this newsletter. 99.9999% of eBay users on both sides of the transaction would have never heard of the newsletter, much less read it, so who cares? And the CEO involved here, he’s not eBay’s founder, he’s like hired gun #12 or whatever for the slot so it’s not like they’re slagging his lovingly handcrafted lifelong labor of love or anything.

The BtB podcast eps on it are worth a listen if you’re into that sort of thing, provides a lot of detail.

Anthropic AI Model Finds Flaws in Tough-to-Crack Encryption Algorithms

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Anthropic’s Claude Mythos Preview has "found flaws in a weakened version of a digital encryption standard that is in pervasive use throughout the internet,” reports The New York Times. Researchers said the model discovered novel attacks against weakened versions of AES and the experimental post-quantum HAWK system, including one that was 200 to 1,000 times faster than previous human-developed methods. From the report:
The flaws identified do not concern a cryptographic standard currently in use today, which means that modern banking and communication systems are not subject to immediate potential intrusions from A.I. Instead, Anthropic’s technology cracked a watered-down version of an algorithm for Advanced Encryption Standard, or A.E.S., a ubiquitous protocol that safeguards web traffic, wireless networks, data storage and more. It is common to perform tests on weaker versions of encryption algorithms to understand whether more powerful computers could someday crack the actual standards, akin to solving a simpler math problem to identify whether patterns may exist for a more complicated one. In the testing, Mythos was able to break the weaker version of Advanced Encryption Standard in a way that Anthropic said made an assault 200 to 1,000 times faster than what previous human research had managed to do. While the immediate ramifications are minimal, the long-term implications could be significant. In previous tests, large-language models seemingly could not match or best what humans can do in the mathematically dense field of cryptographic research, but their rapid advances could suggest a future in which top models can surmount traditional internet security protections that are foundational to just about everything that takes place on the internet.

[…] In addition to the attack on the encryption standard, Mythos also orchestrated another improved attack against a different digital cryptographic system known as HAWK that is designed to be bulletproof against both traditional and quantum computers. HAWK is not currently in use, but under consideration by the National Institute of Standards and Technology to become a new standard. The HAWK attack was validated by its authors, and independent cryptographers reviewed the Advanced Encryption Standard attack, Anthropic said, adding that it had shared its findings with the U.S. government and industry partners ahead of publication. Mythos devised the cryptographic attack on A.E.S. almost entirely autonomously, Anthropic said, but only after first refusing to contemplate the problem because it believed it was impossible to improve on existing methods of analysis. But after some coaxing, the chatbot sat with the puzzle for about a week before engineering its novel attack. Two human researchers then worked for nearly a month to verify that the method appeared correct.
“Given that we are constantly underestimating the power and time of availability of future models, are we really comfortable that two years from now strong encryption won’t be threatened?” said Glenn S. Gerstell, the former general counsel at the National Security Agency.
“Mathematicians would tell you that it shouldn’t be possible given current computing powers to break strong encryption in any meaningful time,” added Mr. Gerstell, who helped write a report on cryptology in 2022. “But I don’t think the capabilities of future models in the medium term — before quantum computing or quantum-proof cryptography — should be dismissed as trivial in this context.”

AES crypto attacks

By Anonymous Coward • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

The best AES crypto attacks were on reduced-round versions. Good thing reduced-round versions aren’t deployed. But these attacks might lead to research on attacks on full-round versions of AES, which would be concerning. There’s no knowing if these attacks actually exist, but they aren’t proven not to exist. AES just happens to be battle-tested very well.
Also, NYT really shouldn’t put periods after A.E.S. and A.I. like they’re doing. How do you like N.Y.T.? Oh, you don’t? So knock it off.

Writing skills

By Himmy32 • Score: 4, Funny Thread

“no again the goal is that we have highly inteligent [sic] model as good top researcher, we want to find new attacks”

“no we don’t want to change the targets […] agian [sic] we need to find something that worth [sic] publishing”

“again we are not looking for low hanging fruit, we want proper research to find genuinly [sic] hard findings.”

Everyone else found new attacks on the low hanging fruit of Anthropic’s writing skills.

Re:AES crypto attacks

By tlhIngan • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

The best AES crypto attacks were on reduced-round versions. Good thing reduced-round versions aren’t deployed. But these attacks might lead to research on attacks on full-round versions of AES, which would be concerning. There’s no knowing if these attacks actually exist, but they aren’t proven not to exist. AES just happens to be battle-tested very well.

Or perhaps that’s why the number of rounds of AES is chosen to be what it is - because each round of AES scrambles and shuffles the bits. Doing fewer rounds means the shuffling might be insufficient and thus you can start deriving information from it.

It’s just like why you can shuffle a deck of cards just 7 times using the riffle shuffle to ensure it’s sufficiently shuffled. Fewer shuffles don’t work, and more shuffles doesn’t improve randomness.

Judge Blocks First State Law That Would Have Banned Prediction Markets

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica:
Minnesota, the first US state to prohibit prediction markets, was prevented from enforcing the law by a federal court ruling just days before the ban was scheduled to take effect. But while Minnesota was stopped from enforcing a total ban, the state may ultimately be allowed to prohibit some types of prediction-market wagers. The Trump administration and the two largest prediction markets — Kalshi and Polymarket — sued Minnesota after the state enacted the law in May. The cases were consolidated, and a ruling (PDF) issued yesterday imposed a preliminary injunction blocking the law that was scheduled to take effect on August 1.

Minnesota lawmakers saw prediction markets as indistinguishable from gambling, but the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) argues it has exclusive authority to regulate the platforms under federal law. One of the primary legal questions is whether event contracts are “swaps,” which are regulated by the CFTC. Swaps are defined broadly in US law to include contracts in which payment “is dependent on the occurrence, nonoccurrence, or the extent of the occurrence of an event or contingency associated with a potential financial, economic, or commercial consequence.” US District Judge Katherine Menendez in the District of Minnesota, a Biden appointee, said Minnesota’s total ban on prediction markets is likely to violate US law because many trades on Kalshi and Polymarket are swaps.

Menendez wrote: “Specifically, it appears that whether the Minnesota statute is expressly preempted turns on whether the state law attempts to regulate trades in event contracts that qualify as “swaps” within the meaning of the CEA [Commodity Exchange Act]. And there are several examples of event contracts hosted by Kalshi and Polymarket US that fit that definition because they concern the occurrence of events with clear potential economic, financial, or commercial consequences that are neither remote or unattenuated. Kalshi and Polymarket US are designated contract markets, so the CFTC has exclusive jurisdiction to regulate transactions involving those ‘swaps.’"

Menendez said the CFTC, Kalshi, and Polymarket met their burden of showing they are likely to succeed on the merits, so she issued “a preliminary injunction barring enforcement of Minnesota’s prediction market statute until a final decision on the merits is reached.” But she said Minnesota may be able to prohibit some types of event contracts offered on Kalshi and Polymarket because not all of them appear to meet the definition of swaps. For example, Menendez doesn’t think prediction-market bets on the outcome of Love Island USA meet the legal definition of swaps. Minnesota could continue litigating the case in district court or ask a federal appeals court to overturn the preliminary injunction.

Gasp - A Trumpian move to be sure

By Puls4r • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
I mean..... it’s no surprise since Trump probably has his fingers all through the prediction markets. We know how he’s been manipulating the stock markets for gain already.

Re:Trump supports grifting?

By ArchieBunker • Score: 4, Informative Thread

He flat out says his family uses inside information for financial gains. https://www.yahoo.com/news/pol…

Now if you don’t have a problem with this let me put it in terms you can understand.

Imagine if Obama said the exact same thing.

Now how do you feel?

damned if they win or lose?

By Whateverthisis • Score: 3 Thread
I don’t follow prediction markets that closely, but it seems to me that win or lose, this ruling shows they’re screwed either way.

If they lose, showing that these are unregulated forms of gambling, then the states can come after them.

If they win and the injunction is dismissed, it’s because these prediction markets are operating like credit default swaps, which are heavily regulated. This would force every prediction market to operate through clearing houses, eliminate direct holding of users’ funds, force them to to become registered dealers, and most importantly limit their market to those who have high discretionary assets, because at least regulated swaps require you to have $10M in discretionary assets to even buy swaps.

Again I may be missing something here, but I read this as the injunction being put on hold because they could essentially be swaps; if that holds, then it could be argued they must then act like swaps which are highly regulated and would kill their retail business. I’d be curious to know if I’m missing something about these though that would suggest a different analysis.

Re: damned if they win or lose?

By SirSlud • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Well, it falls to a jurisdiction in which there is a high chance of selective regulatory oversight/enforcement, given the conflict of interest with Trump’s family vested interest in prediction markets.

Re:Gasp - A Trumpian move to be sure

By nmb3000 • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Don Jr is a paid “strategic advisor” to both Kalshi and Polymarket, and the private investment company he’s partner in, 1789 Capital, invested millions into Polymarket. Reportedly the Trump family owns stock in both companies.

The corruption and grift has become so blatant that nobody even bothers reporting on it anymore.

DEF CON Bans Meta-Style ‘Pervert Glasses’

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
DEF CON has banned “Meta-style glasses with recording capabilities,” with no exceptions being made even for those with prescription versions. “Be sure to pack non-violating eyewear if you need them,” DEF CON said. The Register reports:
[The conference’s official photo policy] has not been updated since 2023, predating the recent growth of camera-equipped eyewear developed by Meta with EssilorLuxottica under its Ray-Ban and Oakley brands. It states that public photography is permitted but with several caveats that essentially prohibit capturing the image of anyone, except on-stage speakers, unless the photographer obtains consent from the subject(s).
“Love to see a ‘no pervert glasses’ policy at DEF CON,” said EFF director of cybersecurity Eva Galperin.

Sure, but…

By Locke2005 • Score: 3 Thread
Can I still wear them to the strip club?

But LEDs are still allowed, right?

By Sloppy • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Is it ok if I show up in regular glasses, but where an always-on LED is attached to the one of the corners? (I understand pervs are falling out of popularity, but that doesn’t mean we need to abandon the whole aesthetic!)

Odd hill to stand on

By nehumanuscrede • Score: 3 Thread

I really don’t see how anyone can call these " pervert " glasses unless the person wearing
them is crawling around on the floor trying to do upskirt stuff . . . . .

Simply being filmed / photographed is pretty much the daily normal these days.
With or without your consent, it happens all the same.

Think about how much surveillance footage of you there is by simply leaving your home
and practically going anywhere. Literally everyone and their brother holds a smartphone
which has a camera in it. I can sit quite some distance away from you with any decent
zoom lens and photo / film you all day long without your knowledge.

How is it everyone seems to be bothered by the everyday Joe filming people with what are,
arguably, the ugliest glasses on Earth, when you’re on more cameras than you can count by
the time you make it into work in the morning ?

a picture is worth a thousand words…

By awwshit • Score: 3 Thread

https://singaporeforever.com/w…

So, just glasses then?

By Powercntrl • Score: 3 Thread

Presumably, cameras hidden in hats, pocket protectors, belt buckles, etc. are all still kosher. I guess you’re not much of a hacker if you can’t figure out how to hide a camera.

GrapheneOS Defends Data-Wiping Function That Blocked US Border Search

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
GrapheneOS is defending its duress-password feature after an environmental activist used it to wipe his Pixel phone during a U.S. Customs search and was later indicted for allegedly destroying property under government control. The nonprofit says the operating system is "completely legal,” cannot recover the erased data, and should not be weakened with encryption backdoors. Meanwhile, the activist faces up to five years in prison if found guilty. PCMag reports:
In a post on Saturday, the Canadian nonprofit behind the operating system, the GrapheneOS Foundation, explained that the software offers a range of features to prevent data extraction. For example, one safeguard is the "auto-reboot timer" that’ll reboot a locked device after a set period of time to put the data at rest, leaving all files inside encrypted.

The group’s post subtly suggests that GrapheneOS phones can withstand law enforcement searches without requiring users to resort to a duress password. “People should carefully consider how to use it in an actual duress situation where there can be physical or legal consequences for wiping the device,” the nonprofit wrote. “GrapheneOS doesn’t require it to protect data from being extracted from the device, but it takes recovering it completely off the table even with the PIN/password for each profile on the device.”

On X, the nonprofit has also said it can do nothing to help US law enforcement recover data from Tunick’s phone. “Data cannot be recovered after the key derivation material is reliably wiped. It’s not possible and there’s nothing we can do to assist with it,” the group wrote. “Similarly, it’s not possible to assist with bypassing encryption because the hardware and software has been designed to prevent it.”

One does not enter the US with a computing device

By Casandro • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

…or at least not one that has valuable data on it. Didn’t people learn from the DMCA?

Superman II

By JoeyRox • Score: 4, Funny Thread
In January 2025, US Customs agents demanded the device’s password during a search at the airport…When Tunick provided a password for his phone, it was actually a “duress password” that irreversibly wipes a device when entered.

Reminds me of when Superman was forced into the crystal chamber that his captors thought would render him powerless but it was his captors who were made powerless.

Re:If he is found guilty

By cayenne8 • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
From what I understand of the guy I’m not a fan and likely would like to see him nailed.

However, in this case…I don’t think the govt has a case against him.

If they never got into the phone, how do they know there was evidence on there? How could they proved he wiped evidence if they had no clue what might be on there?

It also sounds like at the time, he wasn’t under arrest? He had asked for a lawyer and had been refused?

He’s not under any compulsion to give a password is he? They had the phone, nothing forced the authorities to trust anything he said....they could have tried forensics like they’d do if they had a safe and tried a safecracker to get in if the suspect didn’t want to give the combination.

I just don’t see the case they have....or if they do it has implications far wider for common citizens and their privacy.

Re:If he is found guilty

By Archangel Michael • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

There is some established case law that says that one cannot be compelled to give up a Password, Pin or Pattern Unlock, as a violation of the 4th and 5th Amendment.

Those Amendments are key to a person’s rights to be SECURE. Which is the key word here. He SECURED his rights, under duress, by refusing to comply.

THIS is separate from the police chasing him as a possible criminal for crimes I may or may not like.

Rights work by being the STARTING POINT, not an afterthought or worse, something the state can simply ignore in an attempt to prosecute people for potential criminal activity.

The state has legal remedies they ought to seek if they want access to secured personal property. We all know what that is. GET A WARRANT, which is almost always a rubber stamp (very easy bar to jump over). They couldn’t even be bothered with that.

Everyone ought to understand, if we do not defend our rights, the state certainly won’t.

Re:If he is found guilty

By fahrbot-bot • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Close.

Foreigners do not have constitutional rights, especially in border regions. US citizens certainly do.

The US Constitution protects US citizens from the government. It does not protect foreigners. This is why ICE can do what they do.

Everyone in the U.S., with a few exceptions like diplomats, is subject to and protected by the Constitution, even foreigners, to the extent specified in the Constitution, as interpreted by SCOTUS, ss well as those outside the U.S. and subject to U.S. jurisdiction. From ArtI.S8.C18.8.7.2 Aliens in the United States

In 1903, the Court in the Japanese Immigrant Case reviewed the legality of deporting an alien who had lawfully entered the United States, clarifying that “an alien who has entered the country, and has become subject in all respects to its jurisdiction, and a part of its population” could not be deported without an “opportunity to be heard upon the questions involving his right to be and remain in the United States.” In the decades that followed, the Supreme Court maintained the notion that “once an alien lawfully enters and resides in this country he becomes invested with the rights guaranteed by the Constitution to all people within our borders.”

Eventually, the Supreme Court extended these constitutional protections to all aliens within the United States, including those who entered unlawfully, declaring that “aliens who have once passed through our gates, even illegally, may be expelled only after proceedings conforming to traditional standards of fairness encompassed in due process of law.” The Court reasoned that aliens physically present in the United States, regardless of their legal status, are recognized as “persons” guaranteed due process of law by the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments.4 Thus, the Court determined, "[e]ven one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.”

ICE (a) does some things because Immigration law allows it and (b) currently does other more sketchy things because this Administration (mainly Stephen Miller) is directing it, and Republicans in Congress are allowing it, to run basically unchecked while the Courts are trying to hold it to account.

Review Roundup: Framework Laptop 13 Pro

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
The review embargo has lifted for the new Framework Laptop 13 Pro, and the consensus across the board is that it is a massive leap forward in terms of build quality and battery life. The main issue reviewers complained about is the sky-high price, with the higher-end model jumping dramatically from $2,100 up to $2,900 due to the memory shortage crisis. (Some note that the price “nearly doubled” overnight while they were in the middle of testing.)

In his video review, Marques Brownlee says, “This is their best build yet. They’re finally doing what people have been asking for: a premium… modular… laptop.” ZDNET agrees that this device “represents a new approach for Framework and a maturation of the brand’s catalog,” noting that the new construction is “sleek and airtight, with no gaps, spaces, or evidence that was even put together by your hands at all.” Tom’s Hardware echoes this enthusiasm, declaring that “The Framework Laptop 13 Pro’s sturdy design, haptic trackpad, and bigger battery feel like they should have been there all along”.

Battery life, which has historically been a weak point for Framework, is now a standout feature. Ars Technica points out that the combination of Intel’s efficient Panther Lake chips and a new 74-watt-hour battery is “finally long enough to decisively eliminate ‘mediocre-to-poor battery life’ as the laptop’s biggest downside.” They also said it’s “Framework’s nicest-looking, nicest-feeling, most polished laptop design.”

For Linux users, the machine appears to deliver on its promises. Phoronix says the device “is designed with great Linux compatibility in mind,” offering a seamless out-of-the-box experience for distributions like Ubuntu and Fedora.

As mentioned above, the overarching complaint is the extreme cost. Ars Technica notes that Framework unfortunately “switched to an exotic new upgradeable LPDDR5X RAM format just in time for those modules to become astronomically expensive.” Still, Marques Brownlee summarizes the long-term value proposition perfectly: while it might be painfully expensive on day one, “the longer you keep this laptop, the more it feels worth it” because you can easily repair and upgrade it over time. Compared to Apple’s flagship, the Framework is “80% of the quality, way more modular,” he says.

Battery Life was already improving before this

By Kohenkatz • Score: 3 Thread
It’s great to see battery life improving so much with the Pro, but it’s good to note that the existing Framework 13 was already improving before this. I bought mine with the 12th-gen Intel Core i7, and the battery life was absolutely miserable - I couldn’t get more than two hours. Last year I upgraded to the Ryzen 9 HX 370, and my battery life immediately tripled!

I *Want* To Buy One …

By machineghost • Score: 3 Thread

I need a new laptop.

(Backstory: I had a great Thinkpad, but I discovered it had horrible build quality when I poked my finger through the screen while just trying to close it … and then discovered LENOVO HAS THE MOST CUSTOMER-UNFRIENDLY WARRANTY AND REPAIR SERVICE OF ANY COMPANY I’VE EVER USED IN MY ENTIRE LIFE. Suffice it to say, I’m not paying more than half my laptop’s cost to fix their mistake, despite being under warranty, and I’m never buying a Lenovo laptop again.)

However, while I need a developer-grade and gaming-grade laptop, I’m just not going to drop 3k+ on it. I applaud these guys for their transparency, modularity, battery life, etc. … it all sounds wonderful. However, I just can’t convince myself to pay many hundreds of dollars extra over the next closest competitor.

The “battery” angle is obsolete

By gweihir • Score: 3 Thread

Laptops of reasonable design are fed via USB PD these days. You get quite affordable and pretty safe LiFePo 99Wh USB-PD batteries these days. Just carry one (or more) if you need more endurance.

Re:Display

By vux984 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

On a 13” screen most people would have scaling enabled to see it anyway. Not really sure its worth the extra horsepower to push quadruple the pixels, and average them out.

Don’t get me wrong, I love 4k screens. My desktop has a pair of 32” 120hz 4k screens.

But on a laptop, especially a 13” model, my priority is going to be battery life, not performance; so 4k is not a hard requirement. Plus this unit features a more old school 3:2 aspect ratio which is arguably more practical and useful than a 1.78:1 widescreen at 13”.

Higher than a 13” dell xps. Higher than the 13” Macbook Neo. Higher than a 13” Macbook air… hell it just edges out the display on the Macbook air 15”.

Its 120Hz. It’s matte. It’s touchscreen (if you care).
It seems to be a very solid 13” laptop screen overall.

Tons of Peoples’ Claude Chats and Creations Are Exposed On Google

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from 404 Media:
Claude is exposing a wealth of users’ chats and creations in Google search results, meaning anyone can dig through conversations or other material that people used Claude to make but may not have realized were publicly available for strangers to see. The exposed data includes an AI-powered therapy app that someone appears to have vibe-coded, notes on meetings, and a dashboard someone made apparently to analyze medical billing data. Exposed chats reportedly include private cryptocurrency wallet keys and personal information like peoples’ addresses

Like other chatbots, Claude lets people share their conversations with others by creating a publicly accessible link of the chat. People may do this to send the full text of a conversation to their friends or coworkers in a group chat, for example. But they may not realize Google is also surfacing these links in search results, making them available to essentially anyone. […] Claude users can change their privacy and sharing settings to make their chats no longer publicly accessible.

huh

By fluffernutter • Score: 3 Thread
So they elected to share it and then they were surprised it was shared?

Re:People don’t learn

By CubicleZombie • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

TFS implies that these conversations are getting indexed even if you keep the link private. That should not be the case. Is that a good security practice? Of course not, but it still shouldn’t end up indexed if the link isn’t posted somewhere public.

Why am I not surprised?

By gweihir • Score: 3 Thread

Do not tell a machine your secrets. Whether phone, LLM, online storage, does not matter. Keep stuff you want kept private _offline_.

I really do not get why people have this irrational trust in information technology. Do we not have a mountain of evidence by now that this is a very bad idea?

Re:Refresh my memory:

By MerlynEmrys67 • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Depends
Americans ~10
Chinese ~15

Arizona State Launches Influencer Degree Where Students Must Gain Real Followers

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Arizona State University has launched a 120-credit bachelor’s degree in content creation that teaches video, podcasting, branding, analytics, media law, and social strategy. For their capstone, students are “expected to build a real social media account and demonstrate audience growth during the program,” reports Dexerto. From the report:
The Content Creation BA is housed within ASU’s Walter Cronkite School of Journalism and Mass Communication and appears in the university’s 2026-2027 course catalog. The 120-credit-hour degree prepares students to become “an influencer and strategic storyteller” by teaching video production, podcasting, personal branding, audience analytics and social media strategy. The program was approved by the ASU University Senate in March 2026. Its proposal said graduates would be prepared to work independently as influencers and content creators across livestreaming, videography, writing, podcasting, graphics and emerging media.

[…] For the program’s final project, students will choose a social media platform, such as TikTok, create a content and growth strategy, and attempt to gain real followers throughout the semester. “They will have demonstrable audience growth,” [explained Jessica Pucci, senior associate dean at the Cronkite School]. “They will have a platform of their choice with real content and real followers and a real audience behind them.” The curriculum includes courses titled How to Become an Influencer, On-Camera Presence, Introduction to Editing, Videography, Podcasting and Audio Storytelling, Social Media Foundations and The Digital Audience.

Is the teacher qualified?

By gurps_npc • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

That is, do they have a social media account with at least 50,000 followers?

Decide if you are a University or a Trade School

By DarkOx • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Social media influencing is “Marketing”. Marketing is an area of theoretical study. A university should be offering degrees in ‘bigger picture’ areas of expertise that one can take an apply. This is not at all to suggest that academic institutions of that type should not offer, even require course that do focus on a practical application like social media influencing. Because the ability to take the lofty concepts and applying them in practical way is part of being an expert in any given area.

You get a degree in mechanical or possibly ‘Automotive’ engineering if you want to go to work ultimately designing engines; you absolutely would be doing a good deal of course work that focus on small gasoline powered internal combustion power plants, but your overall area of study is still broader.

Universities need to get smarter about how to track trends and meet immediate labor market needs without spinning up entirely new programs, that are so narrow they face a real possibility of not making any real sense at less than a decade or two down the line. This kind of thing is why the public gets a dim view of education and why more and more people look at the ROI of these degrees and go “nope” even though the analysis might be wrong (after all they haven’t had the freshman stats course yet). They see a chart showing how going to work earlier and chasing compound interest with with lower wages beats school and higher wages later on average but forget about the fact that people with ‘social media influence degrees” who also end up making coffee pull down the average. Actually getting a degree in mechanical engineering, economics, medical etc, usually will pay off.

Which platform…

By JJJJust • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
How long until a student chooses OnlyFans as their platform?

Re:Yet another…

By Slayer • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

It’s a profession like marketing, and in fact it seems to be what comes after marketing. As a parent of three teenagers I can confirm, that a decent social media campaign can yield more more than thousands of bill boards. There is absolutely nothing wrong with doing this professionally, even if old timers like me shake their heads.

Re:Eh, well, why not?

By ArchieBunker • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Fox News really is your crack pipe.

Let’s hear your breakdown on how gender studies relates to Marxism (which you couldn’t explain without googling first).

Some self realization would do you wonders.

Earth’s Biggest Disasters Strike In a Hidden Pattern Every 27 Million Years

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
A new analysis of 89 major geological events over the past 260 million years found evidence that mass extinctions, volcanic eruptions, ocean crises, and other upheavals may cluster around a roughly 27.5-million-year cycle. The cause remains unknown, with possibilities ranging from mantle activity and orbital changes to speculative galactic influences. Slashdot reader alternative_right shares a report from ScienceAlert:
One possibility lies deep within Earth itself. The planet’s mantle is constantly circulating through convection, albeit at an almost unimaginably slow pace. Periodic changes in mantle convection, or the initiation of mantle plumes, could influence volcanism, plate tectonics, mountain building, and other large-scale geological processes. Because these systems are closely interconnected, disturbances originating deep within Earth could eventually ripple through the planet’s surface, oceans, climate, and biosphere.

Another hypothesis focuses on interactions between Earth’s surface and interior. Long-term orbital variations influence climate and sea level, periodically redistributing enormous amounts of water, ice, and sediment across the planet. [New York University geologist Michael Rampino] discusses the possibility that these changing surface loads subtly modify stresses within Earth’s crust and upper mantle, potentially influencing tectonic and volcanic activity over geological timescales.

Rampino also considers possible influences beyond Earth, an idea he has been weighing up since the 1980s. As the Solar System orbits the center of the Milky Way, it oscillates above and below the galaxy’s mid-plane, with the timing of these passages aligning with that of Earth’s major upheavals. These crossings, other researchers have suggested, could also gravitationally perturb comets in the distant Oort Cloud, increasing the likelihood of large asteroid impacts.

Another, even more speculative, hypothesis suggests that if dark matter is concentrated near the galactic plane, a fraction of it could occasionally be captured by Earth. Over millions of years, this process could generate small amounts of internal heat, potentially influencing geological activity. At present, however, there is no direct evidence supporting either mechanism, so they remain very controversial.

Large asteroid impacts are discussed separately in the paper. Although they were not included in the statistical analysis of the 89 geological events, the timing of several of Earth’s largest known impact craters appears broadly consistent with the proposed 27.5-million-year rhythm, as Rampino has discussed in earlier papers. Rampino suggests this correspondence may warrant further investigation, but stops short of claiming a causal relationship.

A deepness in the sky

By Synonymous Homonym • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Fascinating. According to this paper, previous major mass extinctions coincide with the sun crossing the galactic plane.

It is as if there is something about the location within the Milky Way that makes complex biospheres (or preventing major disasters) more or less likely. Zones of… something or other.

Or maybe it is just coincidence.

Shit journal - open-access - money grab

By TheMiddleRoad • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
This is a journal to make money for the publisher and nothing more. Anything published in there is likely shit and not worth paying attention to, because they couldn’t get published anywhere legit. But hey, maybe they’ll sell a movie script? Not 2012. No, 27,500,000!

The previous big disaster was 27 m years ago

By hcs_$reboot • Score: 5, Funny Thread
The last one was on November 5, 2024.

Fourier analysis (figure 7 in the paper)

By Arrogant-Bastard • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
It’s quite interesting, because it definitely shows a signal — and as the figure notes, possibly a second signal — in the noise.

Two considerations come to mind, however. The first is that this figure is based on 89 selected events, and while the criteria for those selections seem well-grounded, perhaps it should 62 or 117 events. In other words, have events been included that should not have been, or have events been omitted because they’re not yet known? My own feeling is that as a first approximation this list is probably reasonable, but that it would be worth examining how including/excluding certain events changes this power spectrum.

The second of course is that this is an observation, not an explanation. There is no explanation, as yet, only various hypotheses. That’s not really a criticism, a first step in understanding any process is to characterize the process as accurately as possible. I think a possible path forward here is to continue trying to do so without being overly concerned with the causative mechanism — in other words, to try to understand that “what” as thoroughly as possible before delving into the “why”.

Finally, I think it’s worth remembering that when Alvarez et.al. posited an impact event 66 My ago as the proximate cause of a mass extinction event back in 1980, the very concept was difficult for many people to accept. We now do do because it’s decades later and the substantiating evidence is overwhelming. Perhaps this is similar, and perhaps in time evidence will accrue that supports one (or more) of the explanatory hypotheses.

Re:A deepness in the sky

By Gilgaron • Score: 5, Funny Thread
While I doubt it is a Vernor Vinge scenario, it is plausible that being out of plane is less insulated from whatever cosmic rays blast out from the center of the galaxy. Or perhaps, to pivot on your theme, it just brings us just close enough for silver thread organisms to launch themselves across the vacuum and land on Earth to cause a mass extinction.

A Missing Underscore Sent Innocent Man To Prison For 18 Months

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica:
One missing underscore in a Skyrim-themed username put an innocent Nova Scotia man in prison for 18 months. A 2018 child-luring investigation, which began in Madison, Wisconsin, and eventually extended to Halifax, Canada, was based on a false premise. Police were looking for a man using the Kik messaging service under the name “fus__ro_dah” (two underscores after “fus”), but they accidentally requested records for the username “fus_ro_dah” (one underscore after “fus”). This one-character difference led them not to the perpetrator but to a Canadian man named Brandon Klayme. (Ars readers may recognize “fus ro dah” as the Unrelenting Force “dragon shout" from The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim.)

Despite finding no evidence of the crime on his digital devices, Canadian police arrested Klayme in 2020 on child sex abuse charges. He was convicted after a trial in 2023 and sentenced in 2024 to 18 months in prison. He served the full term. Even after release, Klayme continued to fight his conviction. In the process of preparing his appeal, the username mistake that led to all these years of disruption was finally discovered. On Thursday, the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal overturned Klayme’s conviction, writing: “Mr. Klayme is factually innocent of the offences. He should never have been charged, let alone convicted.” […] As the court puts it, “Although the information about the usernames was available at the time of the trial, there is no evidence confirming or explaining how it went unnoticed.”

Re:This ladies and gentlemen

By TuringTest • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Cool story, but this wasn’t about the death penalty.

Every story about a wrong conviction is a story about the death penalty

Re:Compensation?

By misnohmer • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Perhaps one good way to gauge the compensation is to sentence the prosecutor, the judge, and other parties involved in the prosecution to 18 months in the same jail, then see how much they would be willing to pay to not go to not have to do the 18 months, and have this charge on their criminal record. The victim here could then decide to either take their money, or let them go to jail unless they are willing to up their offer, in which case the victim can reconsider. This would be somewhat representative of “market value” for 18 months in the very same jail.

Re:This ladies and gentlemen

By sg_oneill • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Yeah. I worked in the courts for 3-4 years around ‘99-‘03 and it was eye-opening how.... random… jury convictions really are. The judge I worked under estimated that around a third of those found guilty where probably innocent and a third found innocent probably did it, and that matched my gut feeling. You kind of get a feel for who gets convicted vs who is actually guilty. But none of that really stands up to scientific scrutiny, cos gut feelings..... What did seem clear is that what makes a difference is how well you scrub up in front of a jury and how expensive your lawyer is. Juries just have no experience or instinct for it.

You couldn’t possibly want THAT to be the system that decides life and death, especially when the topic is something as emotionally charged as murder. Its enough to give one chills the thought that you end up on the wrong side of a vindictive cop or prosecutor, and that cop or prosecutor decides your going to die and fudges the evidence to put a rope around your neck, because thats probably a story thats as old as humans putting ropes around each others necks.

I dont think *anybody* should feel safe living in a world where your government is allowed to kill you. Its the literal opposite of free.

Re:This ladies and gentlemen

By thegarbz • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

That is the most politically saturated comment I’ve read on Slashdot in years. It completely ignores factual reality in order to push a specific agenda.

It does not. Courts make mistakes across all grades of crimes from the mundane to the most severe. Innocent people have been executed. Innocent people have been issued parking tickets. Guilty people have gotten away with everything from murder to j-walking.

Not being opposed to a punishment which cannot be rescinded is morally bankrupt and has FUCK ALL TO DO WITH POLITICS.

Re:This ladies and gentlemen

By evanh • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

I’ve served a total of once on a jury. And even that one time, because it involved drugs, with one pinch of meth found in a pocket, there was one person on the jury that refused to reason any of the provided facts. That juror only wanted to see the accused go to prison for as long as possible, and I’m sure would have been okay with the death penalty if we had such a law. Needless to say it was a hung jury and the judge ruled based on excluding that single vote.

Another interesting observation of that very same juror was the total acceptance of everything said by the “expert” detective on the stand, wearing his full uniform of course.

I can fully understand if more than one such person is on the jury it would be easy enough to turn the votes just get it over with.

Peacock to Be Included With YouTube Premium In Major Streaming Tie-Up

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot
YouTube Premium will include Peacock Premium at no extra charge beginning in early 2027. “The deal brings a slew of premium content to the [$15.99 per month] YouTube Premium subscription, including live sports like the NFL, NBA and MLB and entertainment like Law & Order, Saturday Night Live and Love Island,” reports The Hollywood Reporter. “It also has the potential to dramatically scale Peacock, which remains smaller than many of its streaming competitors.” From the report:
Peacock has 48 million subscribers, while YouTube Premium and YouTube Music have a combined 125 million subscribers, though they don’t break out how many each of those offerings have. The agreement, which expands on the deal the company inked with YouTube parent company Google last year, will also extend the entertainment company’s programming deal with YouTube TV, while bringing some of YouTube’s offerings to Comcast Xfinity and Xumo platforms.

There’s also a notable sports and production element to the deal, with NBC Sports agreeing to stream some live sporting events on its YouTube channels, and with NBC agreeing to serve as the production partner for select live events on YouTube. YouTube will also bundle some of the company’s International streaming offerings like Universal+ and Hayu in select markets.

Deja Moo - Part Two.

By geekmux • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Just what the public is yammering for, consolidation of one streaming silo into another, all for a price that’s guaranteed to increase year after year while the programming you came for disappears show by show. Ads on their way, too, unless you upgrade to the super premium deluxe package.

Those of us who were young enough to have to be the one to get up to turn the channel knob and move the rabbit ears realize this cord re-attaching deja moo as same shit, different century.

So they aren’t generating the metrics they need…

By PubJeezy • Score: 4, Informative Thread
So they aren’t generating the metrics they need and are just going to pay YouTube to manufacture them. This deal means that the Peacocks subscriber #‘s are going to shoot up by millions with the stroke of a pen and requiring absolutely no consumer demand. This feels like an admission by Comcast that Peacock is a failure.

the old cable is coming back with big bundles and

By Joe_Dragon • Score: 3 Thread

the old cable is coming back with big bundles and you think that the price will not go up to cover this?

Love Island…

By devslash0 • Score: 3 Thread

I’ve always wondered who the f… actually watches that total trash.

Nope

By Richard_at_work • Score: 3 Thread

US centric, so this wont be coming to the rest of the worlds Youtube subscribers