Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Nvidia CEO Admits Affair With Alleged Chinese Spy. Investigation Opened
  2. Parents Sue Google Over AI Safety Risks On School Chromebooks
  3. Salon, One of the Web’s Pioneering News Outlets, Shuts Down After 31 Years
  4. Claude Code’s ‘Don’t Ask Again’ File Exposes Passwords and Keys in 1,122 Public Copies on GitHub
  5. Do Data Centers Have a Smaller Effect on Electricity Prices Than We Think?
  6. Norwegians Release FOSS GNOME Software for Music Recording, Internet Radio, and Cameras
  7. Python’s CVEs Triple. Anthropic Funds a New Security Developer
  8. Aaron Swartz Would’ve Been 40 Today. His ‘Legacy Lives On’ Says FSF
  9. NASA Announces It’s Looking for New Astronauts
  10. Scifi Magazine ‘Starlog’ Relaunches, and Back Issues Return to Internet Archive
  11. AlpineBSD Announced - an AI-free FOSS OS
  12. Microsoft Removes PC-to-PC Migration from Windows 11, Points Users to OneDrive-Based Backup
  13. Data Centers are Being Powered By Giant Gas Plants, Possibly Increasing Carbon Pollution for Decades
  14. Is Mandating AI Use in the Workplace Backfiring?
  15. Scientists Find Rare Meteorite From Mars With Signs of Ancient Water

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Nvidia CEO Admits Affair With Alleged Chinese Spy. Investigation Opened

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
CNBC reports new details about the relationship of alleged Chinese spy with Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang:
Huang told Nvidia staff in a email on Sunday that he had an affair with the woman and that Nvidia’s board of directors had opened an independent investigation into the spying allegations. “I was unfaithful to my wife. My actions hurt her and our children. There is no excuse for what I did,” Huang wrote in the message. “I am deeply sorry.”
Nvidia’s board “said an independent committee, assisted by outside counsel, will investigate the matter,” reports Axios:
The board said it has no reason to believe national security or company secrets were compromised and expressed confidence in Huang’s leadership… Huang has been a key voice in Washington pushing to loosen restrictions on AI chip sales to China. He argued that keeping American technology in the Chinese market strengthens U.S. competitiveness and prevented China from developing their own potentially more advanced chips.
The board’s statement added that their inquiry “will examine all available information,” CNBC reports. But “An Nvidia spokesperson said that Huang was committed to continuing as CEO of Nvidia without interruption.”

“I love our country and our company,” Jensen Huang wrote in his letter to Nvidia’s staff (as reported by Axios), “and I am committed to protecting NVIDIA and supporting America’s national security. I am proud and grateful to be an American.”

But while U.S. lawmakers have requested Huang appear for closed-door committee briefing, Jensen has not confirmed he’ll appear, notes CNBC:
When asked by the New York Times whether Huang would appear before lawmakers to discuss the matter, Nvidia spokesman John Rizzo declined to comment. “Our chief executive has an outstanding security team that accompanies him where needed,” Mr. Rizzo said in a statement to the Times…

Rizzo said [Thursday] the Nvidia CEO’s interactions with [alleged Chinese spy Alice] Huang were consistent with meetings he has had with any of Nvidia’s customers.

Parents Sue Google Over AI Safety Risks On School Chromebooks

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
The New York Times reports:
After chatting for months with Google’s artificial intelligence on a school-issued Chromebook laptop, a 13-year-old student made plans to end her life, according to a lawsuit filed in California Superior Court on Monday, the latest in a wave of litigation over Big Tech’s effects on young people. The lawsuit, which refers to the girl as Emma, said that her parents first learned she had access to Google’s AI in mid-March after their daughter’s school sent a message warning them that she was in “imminent danger” of self-harm. Emma’s mother logged into the teen’s school Google account and found her daughter composing a suicide note on Google Docs, the complaint said. Her parents, named as John and Jane Doe in the lawsuit, immediately took Emma for an emergency psychiatric evaluation, and she now goes to therapy every week.

Emma, a seventh grader in Charlotte, North Carolina, had grown convinced that she had multiple mental health disorders following interactions with AI Mode, a chatbotlike feature on Google Search, the complaint said. She also searched for “what is a suicide note” and made comments like “I am planning my own funeral” to the AI, the complaint said. The lawsuit is likely the first to claim that Google “hastily integrated” AI features into company apps used on K-12 Chromebooks, Google-powered laptops provided to millions of children by U.S. school districts, while failing to notify their parents of the potential risks…

The case underscores how public school districts have come to depend on classroom laptops, tablets and apps from companies like Google and Microsoft for teaching and learning. In recent years, some Big Tech companies have used their own infrastructure in schools to promote their AI chatbots for teachers and students. The new lawsuit argues that Google’s “sprawling digital ecosystem” of laptops and apps has enabled the tech giant to spread its Gemini AI chatbot across public schools — as well as turn on some students’ access to AI features by default — without parents’ awareness or permission. While school administrators can toggle company apps like YouTube and Gemini on or off for students in different grades, school administrators have complained that Google’s system has not allowed them to disable AI Mode and AI Overview, features that are embedded in Google Search…

The new lawsuit against Google is part of a wave of litigation this year over Big Tech’s effect on young users… Several parents have also sued AI companies over allegations that their children died by suicide following interactions with chatbots.
In a possibly-related development, Google announced a new policy of disabling its AI tools by default for schools this week. And schools that re-enable searches will have a new choice, the New York Times points out: “to enable student access to the AI features that the company has already embedded in search or to a new AI feature intended to assist students with schoolwork.”

But Google still isn’t offering schools an option to turn off AI altogether in search, a company executive told the New York Times, because “search and AI are deeply integrated.”

Thanks to long-time Slashdot reader theodp for sharing the article.

Little risk compared to…

By rtkluttz • • Score: 3 • Thread

AI is a very small risk compared to government controlled laptops being sent home with kids that give government far too much control and insight into kids lives outside of school. Insight that they should not have in any capacity whatsoever. As an IT security worker I refused to let my kids bring home laptops or chromebooks that were in control of the schools. Those laptops can have cameras turned on, microphones turned on, files modified… basically anything anyone can do with remote administration tools. While at school, this is warranted and needed. The second the child leaves school property, that same control is over reach. The only way to reconcile the two needs is to have that equipment never leave school grounds. Even when remote admins claim none of the capability exists, they go cold and quiet when someone like me who works in the industry points out that claim is irrelevant. That simply because they are admins, that capability can be added on a whim and removed before someone looks. Government should not be able to track where a family is through that hardware/software. They should not have control of a device that can be sitting in a childs bedroom or anything close to this.

Salon, One of the Web’s Pioneering News Outlets, Shuts Down After 31 Years

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
“It has been an extraordinary privilege,” says the subheading on Thursday’s announcement. After 31 years Salon.com will stop publishing, according to an announcement which appeared on the site under the byline “Salon”. It remembers that Salon “was an idea about what journalism could be, born at a moment when the internet was still a largely unexplored frontier.”
When Salon launched in November 1995, the web was a very different place. A small group of journalists set out to create something original: a publication with a strong voice, a curiosity about the world and a belief that the internet could bring journalism and readers together in new ways. They helped pioneer a form of journalism that would come to define an entirely new era of publishing. Over three decades, Salon has brought together politics, culture, criticism and ideas in a way that was distinctly our own…

Our writers and editors helped shape conversations about the forces changing our lives. The work was never simply about keeping up with the news. It was about making sense of it… To the founders who imagined it, the staff members who built it, the contributors who gave it their voices and the alumni who carried its spirit into the world: Thank you. Salon’s legacy belongs to all of you…

The business realities of independent digital journalism have changed profoundly over the years. After careful consideration, we have reached the difficult decision that our publishing model is no longer sustainable…

Thirty-one years is a remarkable run, but what matters most is what happened during those years: the journalism, the ideas, the voices, the conversations and the community that grew around them. Salon helped demonstrate what digital journalism could be and could become. We hope that legacy will continue to matter long after today.

Thank you for being part of our story. It has been an extraordinary privilege.
Slashdot reader oumuamua remembers Salon as one of the internet’s first digital-native publications. Slashdot linked to Salon many times over the years — for example, this 1998 story headlined “Linus Story in Salon”.
Peter Neves was the first of many who wrote in to tell us about an article in Salon Magazine that describes an

"…analogy between MS and the Catholic Church, and Linus and Martin Luther. "
The Associated Press remembers Salon as "an early staple of internet discourse.” And while Salon told them there were no immediate plans to take down Salon’s online archives, the Associated Press notes the site’s announcement “did not immediately indicate what would become of its employees, though some reported they had lost their jobs.” (Longtime staff writer Amanda Marcotte wrote on her Patreon that she and “everyone” are “the latest victim of AI’s predations.”) “A spokesperson for the outlet said 19 full-time employees had been affected, as well as a handful of private contractors,” writes the Associated Press.

Variety adds that Salon “joins later-arriving sites such as Buzzfeed and Gawker that found it difficult to monetize cultural and topical reporting for a general audience and eventually shut down.”

Nothing of Value Was Lost

By Kunedog • • Score: 3 • Thread
Who will publish Todd Nickerson now?

Salon closed?

By PPH • • Score: 3 • Thread

After 31 years, most of my hair has fallen out. So I won’t be needing them any longer.

Claude Code’s ‘Don’t Ask Again’ File Exposes Passwords and Keys in 1,122 Public Copies on GitHub

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Be careful with the file .claude/settings.local.json, warns The Hacker News:
Passwords and API keys that developers typed into commands they approved in Claude Code are sitting in public GitHub repositories, where anyone can read them. When a user selects “Yes, and don’t ask again,” Anthropic’s AI coding assistant can save the command, word-for-word, including the secret, in a project settings file. Software security company Apiiro said that 1,122 public copies of that file hold at least one secret, though it did not test whether any still work. One company the researchers notified earlier this week confirmed its key had been live…

Removing [the file] from a project does not undo the leak, because older versions stay in git history and in forks of the repository. The researchers’ advice is to rotate first: change every password, token, and key the file has ever held, then clean up…

Claude Code tries to keep the file out of git. The first time it writes the file in a git repository, it adds the file to the user’s global git excludes, its settings documentation says. Git on that computer then ignores the file in every repository. That protection stays in one user’s git settings on one computer. It does nothing for a file that was already committed, the researchers say. Claude Code never adds the file to the project’s own .gitignore, so the protection does not travel with the project. In 539 of the 1,105 repositories the researchers traced, a commit listing Claude as a co-author changed the file. They take this to mean Claude often commits the file itself.

Apiiro’s search of public GitHub found 104,185 copies of the file in 103,617 repositories, its research write-up shows. About 1.1% of them, or 1,122 copies, hold at least one secret. Together they hold 1,379 different secrets… ]And “in half of those repositories it had been there for at least 217 days.”] More than a third of the secrets open a database directly, including 379 database passwords. Others include 43 SSH logins for public servers, 42 tokens for GitHub, GitLab and npm, and 23 AWS keys. Among the owners of these files are 63 organizations, mostly software companies of all sizes. The strongest cases include a database vendor’s own admin-level cloud key and the owner password of a medical-records database, the researchers say.
Boris Cherny, Anthropic’s head of Claude Code, responded to the story in a comment on Hacker News:

“Historically Claude Code has not done secret scrubbing (there are many good tools for that), but we are looking into what we can do to prevent this.

That said, a few thoughts:

1. .claude/settings.local.json is meant to stay local. This is not a file you should check into source control. We automatically gitignore it when Claude creates the file, so in this case the files were manually created and checked in (docs: https://code.claude.com/docs/en/settings)

2. Permission rules are old hat. Everyone should be using auto mode instead. It is safer and also does not require manually maintaining finicky allow/deny lists. Auto mode is enabled by default and is included for free in all plans.

3. Regardless of what agent you use, you should have secret scanning enabled. GitHub and other source control hosts offer it. There are many threat models that it protects against and you should absolutely use it if you can. (see https://github.com/security/plans)"



Cherny also named approaches Anthropic plans to prototype, Apiiro notes in an update, citing Cherny’s goal of “making sure auto mode catches this, building in basic secret scanning,” and, when a reader noted the same can happen in auto mode when it asks about a sensitive command, answered “good catch.”

Claude Code users had already filed a bug report on the issue on August 11, 2025, notes The Hacker News, but “An automated bot closed that report as ‘not planned’ on January 3, after 60 days without activity.”

Three more bug reports were then filed, according to the researchers. “None got a reply from Anthropic, and three were closed automatically as inactive or duplicate.”

What a bunch of blithering idiots

By gweihir • • Score: 3 • Thread

Not the users, the makers of Claude. (The users just do not know any better and that is entirely expected.) Looks to me like the people at Anthropic have zero clue about IT security and they make pathetic beginner’s mistakes. Are these really the people you want to trust with your secrets?

Do Data Centers Have a Smaller Effect on Electricity Prices Than We Think?

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
“According to a new study by researchers at Harvard University and the University of Pennsylvania, data centers are probably having only a small effect on residential electricity prices,” reports the Washington Post.

“The researchers calculated that these operations were responsible for just 4% of the utility rate increases over the last five years…”
There are certainly some areas — like in Pennsylvania, Virginia, Ohio and other states covered by grid operator PJM — where data centers have skyrocketed demand, pushing some costs onto residential customers. But multiple studies by different researchers and organizations have failed to find a strong connection between data centers and the overall trajectory of U.S. electricity prices in recent years. Another analysis earlier this year by researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology found that, between 2010 and 2024, data centers increased average electricity prices for residential customers by just 2.1%. Last year, research from the Brattle Group and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory found that data centers were actually decreasing costs in certain regions. And another study by the Electric Power Research Institute found that a doubling of data center capacity between 2019 and 2024 resulted in a 4 percent drop in home electricity prices…

The new Harvard and Penn study found a slightly higher impact on industrial electricity prices — the price paid by manufacturers and large facilities. For those customers, data centers were responsible for 15% of the price increase between 2020 and 2025. But for ordinary Americans… the changes simply were not substantial [according to Wharton School professor Serguei Netessine, one of the study’s authors]. “So far we have no evidence that data centers increase prices all that much,” Netessine said. Instead, he said, prices are rising due to more quotidian factors: rising gas prices, an aging electricity grid, and wildfires and hurricanes requiring improvements to the grid and recovery after disaster…

If the number of data centers continue to boom, experts say, residential prices could be affected more down the line. Data center electricity demand is expected to increase steeply over the next few years, requiring new power generation — wind, solar or natural gas — to be put onto the grid. And residents have issues with data centers that go beyond the price of electricity. The new developments have been singled out for loud noise, polluting power generation, and for disturbing residential neighborhoods and natural landscapes. According to the Pew Research Center, more than half of Americans say that data centers are mostly bad for the environment. Others feel that the AI race — which could ultimately leave many Americans out of work — is being forced upon them.

“I think generally what we’re seeing is a broader range of reasons the public has opposed data centers,” [said Ryan Hledik, principal at the Brattle Group]. “Concern about AI leading to loss of jobs — all of that is getting packaged together.”

Only a small effect?

By PsychoSlashDot • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
“Data centers are probably having only a small effect on residential electricity prices.”

So… 4%, which is double the target inflation rate and is solely due to datacenters… is “small”? That’s the increase the researchers indicate is due to datacenters, meaning that’s on top of inflation factors.

No thanks. Even if the 4% is spread over the 5 years, nearly 1% a year is also too damned much.

If a new subdivision is built and real people live there creating demands on services, that’s understandable. If new industrial or commercial developments that create jobs and products is built and that creates demands on services, that’s understandable. Yes, there are datacenters that provide things we apparently want such as hosting DoorDash or Amazon or porn sites. But the current rush is about AI, which is being shoved where it isn’t asked-for, like Red Dye #3.

If the results of this study was a tenth of a percent per year or less, maybe it’d be “small”. This isn’t.

Emergency effect

By gurps_npc • • Score: 3 • Thread

Say the town uses 150 MW.
The 4 nearby generator is capable of 200 MW. If those fail they have to import from the more expensive place at double normal prices.

Before data center, they import once a year.

After data center they import 10 times, all in January/February

That may only be 4% more, but it hits all together .It’s like a 40% price raise for that time period.

consider the source

By zeiche • • Score: 3 • Thread
coming from the Washington Post, i’m gonna chock this up to “fake news” and move along.

More specifically, researchers at …

By fahrbot-bot • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread

“According to a new study by researchers at Harvard University and the University of Pennsylvania, …

According to TFStudy, one researcher is from Harvard and two are from The Wharton School at Penn, the alma mater of the current President, who *loves* data centers. Not necessarily implying anything about their less unfavorable conclusions, just throwing that out there.

Norwegians Release FOSS GNOME Software for Music Recording, Internet Radio, and Cameras

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
ole (Slashdot reader #19,909) writes in about his free, Norwegian open-source music recording studio for GNOME called GarageJam, which he says allows musicians to compose, record, and share original music seamlessly on the Internet.
The latest release, GarageJam 8.0.1, is available in C and Python. It records audio immediately to Ogg Vorbis (.ogg) files in the current working directory and lets you edit metadata in .gjxml XML files from a GTK/GNOME wizard — all built on the Gingerblue Recording Studio API.
Ole shares links to its IETF GarageJam XML draft and GitHub repositories, and there’s also GarageJam Studio, “a commercial music and audio recording app for the World Wide Web written by Aamot Innovation from Norway.”.

ole is also spreading the word about GNOME Media, which “puts internet radio and your photographs on one OpenStreetMap… built from GNOME Radio 85.0.1.”
Click a station on the map to listen. Cities with several stations show a count and a menu. Open a folder of pictures or import from a camera. Photos with a GPS position in their EXIF data appear on the map. Double-click a thumbnail to open it. The search box filters the station list and the map together.
ole also announces:

Fjords guitars and Linux

By Mirnotoriety • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread
Only in open source can one release a music studio, an internet radio map, camera software and an educational Linux distribution and call it a Sunday afternoon’s work. Joking aside, it’s great to see people building useful, quirky software instead of another subscription-based cloud service. More of this, please!

Python’s CVEs Triple. Anthropic Funds a New Security Developer

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
In the last year CVEs have increased 3x for Python and its package manager Pip, according to Python’s security developer in residence Seth Larson. “And the amount of malware published and removed from the Python Package Index (PyPI) is up 60%.” Securing Python’s ecosystem is getting more complex, he writes, especially given “the evolving role of AI in both security risks and security response.”

Their response includes bringing on a new Security Developer “to address the increasingly demanding scale of security response for the Python ecosystem.”
Providing prompt security response services and innovating to prevent future threats… is more difficult now than ever before… [Security developer Brett Smith] will help us keep pace with critical ongoing work such as vulnerability remediation, providing vulnerability data as a CVE Numbering Authority, and removing malware from PyPI. He’ll also give the team bandwidth for new projects such as scaling PyPI’s autonomous quarantine program to reduce manual effort on malware remediation and streamlining processes for the PSRT to handle the new vulnerability report volume.
The role was made possible by an "ecosystem security” grant from Anthropic. And having the new security developer “will both build capacity for security work the PSF already does and enable new, proactive work,” concludes Python’s security developer in residence. (He discussed Python’s security challenges in a June presentation with Python security engineer Mike Fiedler> .)

In June, Curl’s Daniel Strenberg reported Curl’s CVEs have also tripled.

Aaron Swartz Would’ve Been 40 Today. His ‘Legacy Lives On’ Says FSF

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
“Aaron Swartz would have turned forty this year,” writes FSF deputy director Sean O’Brien. “November 8 is Aaron Swartz Day, when we remember a pioneer of free software and information sharing whose contributions helped shape the modern internet.”

The Internet Archive will host a hackathon Sunday in San Francisco celebrating Aaron’s Swartz’s life “and the projects he worked on, many of which are still going strong today,” including SecureDrop, OpenLibrary, and Creative Commons. “We are also spreading the word about projects he inspired,” including OnionPress and the EFF’s Atlas of Surveillancedocumenting police tech use through open source research, now a collaborative effort with volunteers, the University of Nevada, Reno, and the Reynolds School of Journalism. The event is also supported by Free Law Project, and organizers are asking attendees to “bring a color print out of your favorite photos of Aaron for a huge collaborative collage.”

From the Internet Archive’s blog:
Aaron was also a co-founder of Creative Commons, where he worked with Lisa Rein developing the RSS-enhanced HTML code that sits behind Creative Commons licenses, much of which is still in use today. The “Quantifying the Commons” project was designed to help measure open-licensed and public-domain works worldwide, and is one of the projects participants can work on. Aaron loved Tor and created tools such as "Tor2web" (with Virgil Griffith) to help more people publish Tor-accessible websites. Onion Press is a Tor-based publishing system designed for decentralized, censorship-resistant publishing, and participants can work on the code base…

We also encourage you to have a hackathon in your own town using our materials — or materials of your own. Please let us know if you plan to do this (although it’s not required!). If you do let us know, we can include you on our website and help you spread the word about your event. So far, there is an event in Portland sponsored by Portland Civic Lab where they will be screening The Internet’s Own Boy and celebrating Aaron’s life.
“EFF was proud to call Aaron a friend and ally,” the digital rights organization posted this week. And the FSF’s deputy director writes “It is particularly striking that some of the world’s largest companies now rely on technology Swartz helped to develop.”
One of Swartz’s most important technical contributions was his collaboration with John Gruber on Markdown, the simple text formatting system introduced in 2004. Markdown allows users to create structured documents using ordinary text, without requiring proprietary software. More than twenty years later, Markdown has become one of the most popular formats for documentation and publishing, and is widely used in community websites such as forums and wikis. This is not a minor contribution. Companies developing LLMs use Markdown extensively in their products and development tools. OpenAI, for example, recommends Markdown for organizing instructions and communicating structure to its ChatGPT models… Swartz also developed web.py, a public domain framework for building Python applications, and contributed to RSS 1.0, a public internet standard for distributing news and other information between websites.
Swartz developed web.py while rewriting the software running Reddit after Reddit acquired Swartz’s company Infogami.

Reddit recently licensed its content to AI companies, and the FSF’s deputy director notes “the enormous scale of the alleged ‘piracy’ by giant technology corporations” while Aaron himself had “faced criminal prosecution for downloading academic research that he wanted to distribute with no monetary gain.”
In 2011, federal prosecutors charged Swartz with computer fraud and related offenses after he downloaded millions of academic articles from the JSTOR collection through MIT’s university network… Although he was not charged with copyright infringement, he faced aggressive federal prosecution and the possibility of decades in prison before he tragically died by suicide in January 2013, at just twenty-six years old…

Swartz helped build tools that made the internet more useful and accessible, and his contributions continue to shape a world he never lived to see. On Aaron Swartz Day, we should remember his achievements and the access-to-knowledge principles that guided them. The companies benefiting from his legacy should respect those same principles by giving users true freedom and control, rather than imposing more restrictions on us all.

Re: You know what I think

By commodore73 • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
Trump would call him a loser.

Re: You know what I think

By topham • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

He tried to off himself before he was ever threatened with prison.

He was mentally unstable and instead of accepting that he needed help them blame the government.

He was used by the people wanting to liberate data, and he died for it.

Re:You know what I think

By _merlin • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

You sound like a cheerleader for authoritarian police states. Civil disobedience is widely considered to be a valid form of protest against unjust laws. Should Rosa Parks have just sat at the back of the bus? Should Gandhi have told people to just follow the law?

Re: You know what I think

By nikkipolya • • Score: 4, Informative • Thread

Obama’s wanted to make an example out of him, to scare every future potential Swartz.

Duality of Man and the System

By Himmy32 • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Aaron did both good and bad things.

Belief that we should have open access to scientific data that’s largely sponsored by public funds is a noble idea. And expressing it by breaking into network closets and downloading so fast that the system breaks is a bad idea.

Likewise there is undoubtedly injustice in a system that throws 35 years in a federal prison at one activist while Facebook can torrent 100’s of terrabytes of journals, books, and media without consequence and the judge finds it as mostly fair use.

Too much of the situation seemed like it was the script to a campy 1990’s film with characters shouting Hack the Planet. But in real life the characters aren’t one dimensional. People both making him out to be either the hero or the villain are living in that fantasy world, where instead he was the standard tragically flawed human being.

NASA Announces It’s Looking for New Astronauts

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Saturday NASA officials announced it’s accepting applications for a new astronaut class, reports the Associated Press:
With only 32 active astronauts, the space agency needs more recruits as it looks to expand humanity’s presence beyond low-Earth orbit as quickly as possible… “We have far more work than we have astronauts,” Artemis III commander Randy Bresnik told The Associated Press on Saturday. Aspiring astronauts have between now and Dec. 3 to submit their applications… [They’ll begin their training by early 2028]. By then “we’re going to have people on the moon — so don’t delay,” Bresnik urged potential candidates.

Bresnik and his three crewmates will blast into orbit next summer to practice docking their capsule with a pair of lunar landers, one built by Elon Musk’s SpaceX and the other by Jeff Bezos’ Blue Origin. Their mission will stick close to Earth — no lunar flyby — and serve as a dress rehearsal for the following year’s Artemis IV mission that will attempt to land two astronauts near the lunar south pole. The moon base will materialize as more rovers, robots, structures and power grids are launched.
The article notes NASA’s last call for new astronauts was two years ago, and “More than 8,000 applied, with 10 making the final cut in September 2025.”

If it’s a Boeing

By ruddk • • Score: 3 • Thread

I ain’t going

Reminds me…

By commodore73 • • Score: 4, Funny • Thread
I was in 8th grade during the challenger disaster. The going joke was that NASA stood for “need another seven astronauts.”

Scifi Magazine ‘Starlog’ Relaunches, and Back Issues Return to Internet Archive

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Slashdot reader sandbagger brings news about the classic science ficdtion magazine Starlog. It’s 33-year run from 1976 to 2009 is now available on the Internet Archive.

And 17 years after publishing its final issue, Starlog is relaunching, publishing one issue a year starting November 13, according to The Hollywood Reporter:
The magazine launched in 1976 and gained a fanbase for being one of the few places to get reliable news and interviews about geek culture. It launched with a cover focusing on Star Trek, one of its key areas of expertise, but the magazine’s editors and writers also pioneered coverage of Star Wars. (The new issue chronicles some of the rumors it put out a year before the movie opened). In all, Starlog published 374 issues and more than 25,000 pages… In addition to the film and TV-focused features Starlog was known for, the new Starlog will also delve into futurism, as the cover from Gabriel Yeganyan highlights. The opening story of issue No. 1 looks at the viability of humans farming crops on planets outside of Earth, for example… The revival was announced earlier this year, and includes a podcast hosted by Jordan Hoffman, a veteran journalist who has contributed to The Hollywood Reporter.

Archive call

By Anonymous Coward • • Score: 3, Informative • Thread

Everyone and anyone interested in their episodes, or data preservation in general, should go download the full collection immediately!

The company who purchased the IP rights during their bankruptcy, Fangoria Holdings, still believes they own part of the IP rights.
This is the company that tried (and largely succeeded) to have all available copies destroyed, and are the reason they were removed from the internet archive.

Please don’t let them do it again!

AlpineBSD Announced - an AI-free FOSS OS

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Lproven (Slashdot reader #6,030) shares his article about a new OS in the BSD family “combining NetBSD’s kernel and libc with a port of the Alpine Linux userland” — and promising it won’t use AI-generated code:
AlpineBSD is so new that it barely exists yet. There are no installation media available, though it’s possible to manually bootstrap an installation. What AlpineBSD does already have is an AI policy, and the plan is to avoid “the output of generative AI models (e.g. LLMs)" as far as possible:

“Any software whose code, documentation, binaries, or other assets include, in any part, the output of a generative AI tool such as an LLM, is considered ‘tainted’ for our purposes....”

Back in 2024, the NetBSD project made its position on AI plain. Its commit guidelines say that “code generated by a Large Language Model […] is presumed to be tainted code....”

AlpineBSD’s ports repository and source code are hosted on Sourcehut, under the account of sircmpwn, better known as Drew DeVault… We will follow AlpineBSD with interest. There’s strong appeal in the plan of combining perhaps the best-known, longest-established AI-free Unix-like kernel with the user-facing parts of pretty much the smallest and cleanest Linux distro there is. The AI advocates often warn LLM skeptics that they risk being left behind. Well, here’s an OS for those who don’t want to surf the AI wave.
The article does acknowledge difficulty installing software using the pkgin package manager (an optional extra), explaining that since 1993 the NetBSD community has had “its own ideas about what is normal… Some folks on the mailing list told us that they never use binary packages anyway — they compile what they need from source code.”

Reminds me of SQLite’s stance

By Sebby • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

This stance reminds me a bit of SQLite’s stance on contributions:

SQLite is open-source but it is not open-contribution. All the code in SQLite is written by a small team of experts. The project does not accept “pull requests” or patches from anonymous passers-by on the internet

The main reason in their case is that they want to maintain the code as pure public domain, so don’t want it “tainted” by contributions of unknown origin that might later cause issues if used.

Footgun…

By x0ra • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Back in 2024, the NetBSD project made its position on AI plain. Its commit guidelines say that “code generated by a Large Language Model […] is presumed to be tainted code....

That’s a hell of a way to dig your own grave… not that NetBSD was relevant in any way…

Re:Reminds me of SQLite’s stance

By arglebargle_xiv • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
I contribute to a project with a similar policy, and it’s not because we’re worried about PRs sapping and impurifying our precious bodily fluids but because the code base does something that’s quite difficult to understand for most people and so we analyse the issue in a code change request and then rewrite it in the appropriate way. I was at a talk by the SQLite devs years ago and the said that was why they were a small team, you need a huge amount of knowledge of low-level database internals just to begin to work with SQLite, so they don’t actively exclude people but there’s just naturally a very small number of people able to work on the code.

Re:AI works, really well

By ArmoredDragon • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread

I’ve been setting up agents for scanning for security hole at work. It’s pretty good, and as someone pointed out recently AI is making us pay back 40 years of technical debt. It’s also quite good at finding security holes in its own code. But also it still has a tendency to produce slop and vastly overengineer solutions to simple problems.

I’ve found that if you don’t use weakly typed, anti-pattern riddled languages like C++ or python, it’s a lot less sloppy. C++ is like trying to build a 6502 out of high-voltage uninsulated wires anyway, and no longer has any compelling use case other than you’ve been told to maintain code somebody originally started writing 20 years ago, so it’s not as if anybody’s going to use that crap for anything new unless they just plain suck as a developer. Python still has some compelling use cases, such as quick logic glue, especially for people just learning to code and haven’t yet discovered much of the patterns they thought were useful were actually footguns. Either way, these languages are prone to slop with or without AI.

Re:Reminds me of SQLite’s stance

By test321 • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

All the big actors are using AI in their code. Who’s left to sue on that line? The code of the Linux kernel is authored by Intel, AMD, Google, Meta, IBM, NVIDIA, Oracle, HP, Samsung, Huawei, NXP semiconductors, Realtek, Renesas ( https://lwn.net/Articles/11002… ). Who would fight their combined legal budget?

Microsoft Removes PC-to-PC Migration from Windows 11, Points Users to OneDrive-Based Backup

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Windows 11 offered a PC-to-PC Migration feature that “moved files and settings directly between two PCs over Wi-Fi or Ethernet,” reports Ghacks. But according to an updated Microsoft support page, the tool is no longer available.

“Microsoft’s support documentation now redirects users to Windows Backup, a tool that relies on OneDrive cloud storage instead of a direct connection between two computers…”
Windows Backup works differently. It requires a personal Microsoft account and backs up supported folders (Desktop, Documents, Pictures, Videos and Music) to OneDrive. Free OneDrive accounts include only 5GB of storage, and Microsoft’s own promotional screenshot for Windows Backup shows 4.5GB of that allowance already in use. Years of photos, documents and downloads can exceed the free tier quickly.

Windows Backup does carry some extras. It can remember installed apps, Wi-Fi networks, passwords and some settings to speed up setup on a new device. Apps still have to be reinstalled, and supported files are restored from the cloud.
Thanks to Slashdot reader joshuark for sharing the article.

Time to squeeze platform users trapped again

By atrimtab • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Ah, more “permanent rent seeking” by a tech company!

Just like the Frontier AI play… Pay us forever while we listen in and steal your IP.

No Thanks!

Microsoft, why should anyone use and pay forever your invariably slower online backup service until their systems die versus what they can do locally?

Re:Time to squeeze platform users trapped again

By thegarbz • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

Two words, asshole; Fuck. You.

No Sam Altman you can’t have my RAM and don’t post AC we can tell it’s you.

You can never

By Vinegar Joe • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

hate Microsoft enough.

Re: It’s simpler than that,

By angryman77 • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread
I usually just do this manually. I plug the old computer directly into the new one, set the IPs manually, login to the old machine using the admin’s credential, and start copying as quickly as the HDDs/SSDs can handle.

This takes a bit with drive sizes these days using the gigabit network adapters you usually see on laptops, if they have a network port at all, but I’ve got a couple 10gbit network adapters with usb-c connectors for newer machines.

Re:It’s simpler than that,

By martin-boundary • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Why does Linux need this? It’s not trying to tie you to a single hardware configuration like Windows(*).

With Linux you are completely free to take your old HD and just stick it into your new shiny PC, and everything will just work. Personally though, I use a NAS. My data is accessible from any one of my many PCs over the home network. It’s super convenient, and if I need a bigger disk I just buy that one component and add it to the NAS. No need to copy anything.

(*) so they can gouge your for an extra license if you ever decide to replace or upgrade some components.

Data Centers are Being Powered By Giant Gas Plants, Possibly Increasing Carbon Pollution for Decades

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Rather than racing toward their net-zero targets, Amazon and other AI/cloud computing companies “are driving emissions sharply higher,” reports the Washington Post:
To support their data centers, tech firms are driving construction of a new generation of supersized, gas-fired power plants that could lock in hundreds of millions of tons of climate pollution for decades to come, according to corporate disclosures and an analysis conducted for The Post by a researcher at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. Industry estimates show these projects have put the tech sector on course to grow from a modest driver of industrial carbon pollution into one of the world’s biggest emitters of greenhouse gases. Some anticipate that its share of global carbon emissions will increase as much as fivefold from 2020 to 2030. That would leave the tech industry churning out more than half the climate pollution created by global aviation or shipping — sectors long associated with driving warming…

Already, Amazon’s carbon footprint reached 80.85 million metric tons last year — 58% larger than when [Amazon CEO Jeff] Bezos pledged to shrink it. The company has veered far from the path laid out in the Paris agreement, which would have emissions falling steeply by now and dropping to 43% below 2019 levels by 2030. The tech companies say in corporate disclosures and public statements that they remain committed to their net zero targets, and they suggest the emissions surge is temporary — to be mitigated down the road, when new energy technologies enable the data centers to run cleaner and more efficiently. They also stress that they continue to invest in clean energy and rank as some of the world’s biggest consumers of it. With some complicated accounting maneuvers and carbon credit purchases, their solar, wind and geothermal installations partly cancel out their gas emissions, according to corporate disclosures.
A June report from international insurance/asset management Allianz found the world’s data center emissions are on track to double to 643 million tons of CO2 annually between 2020 and 2030, the article points out. And they cite American data centers contributing to the problem:

Re:We decided we don’t want nuclear

By thegarbz • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

So here we are.

Do you think Amazon is going to wait 20 years to start their datacentre? WTF is wrong with you. These guys can’t even wait for conventional powerplants to be built.

No one of the “we” decided anything in this case. We have no deciding power. Governments don’t even seem to have deciding power where. Amazon decided, unilaterally, to do whatever is fastest, and nuclear power is the exact opposite of that.

Even the biggest of nuclear proponents would have to recognise how dumb your comment is in this context.

Re:“possibly” - WTAF?

By ClickOnThis • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

Look at TFS again.

“tech firms are driving construction of a new generation of supersized, gas-fired power plants that could lock in hundreds of millions of tons of climate pollution for decades to come […] these projects have put the tech sector on course to grow from a modest driver of industrial carbon pollution into one of the world’s biggest emitters of greenhouse gases. Some anticipate that its share of global carbon emissions will increase as much as fivefold from 2020 to 2030. That would leave the tech industry churning out more than half the climate pollution created by global aviation or shipping"

You claim it’s “easily refuted” that such large-scale construction of gas-fired power plants will affect carbon concentration in the atmosphere. Please feel free to do so.

Oh and while you’re at it, please share your intel on the source of funding for the article being “coal-powered Chinese monies.”

Re:“Possibly”

By SoftwareArtist • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

Solar or wind farms, which pollute just as much if not more due to the production pipeline to make those machines?

Is someone paying you to post these ridiculous lies? The energy payback period for modern solar panels is about one year. That’s how long it takes for them to produce as much energy as was used in manufacturing them. Everything after that is free and totally non-polluting.

Another measure is how much CO2 is released for each unit of energy produced. From the same article, the numbers are 41 grams of CO2 per kWh for rooftop solar, 490 g/kWh for gas, and 820 g/kWh for coal.

Re:“Possibly”

By ceoyoyo • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

Solar or wind farms, which pollute just as much if not more due to the production pipeline to make those machines?

It’s funny the things you can claim when you’re allergic to numbers, hey? The typical CO2 payback time for a wind project in Wyoming is six months or less on an operational life of 20 to 30 years. Solar seems to be a bit longer but still under a year.

Re:We decided we don’t want nuclear

By Guspaz • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

The latest one is Vogtle’s units 3 and 4, which are Westinghouse AP1000 units, which cost $36.8 billion USD for around 2.2 gigawatts of capacity.

However, recent and upcoming Canadian plants are relevant, because the US and Canada operate a shared electrical grid (excepting Quebec and Texas, and Quebec still has connections to the US and Canada). OPG is currently building GE Vernova Hitachi Nuclear Canada (what a mouthfull) BWRX-300 SMR reactors, with four of them expected to provide 1.2 gigawatts of capacity for $20.9 billion CAD (or $14.8 billion USD), and if we were to predict future costs by assuming future reactors cost the same as reactors 2-4 (as serial production) rather than reactor 1 (the first ever of its type), a similar project, four reactors plus shared infrastructure, would cost $19.2 billion CAD (or $13.6 billion USD). That is roughly two thirds the cost of the latest US reactor, per gigawatt.

Of course, the Darlington project is still fairly early on, and it’s possible that costs will be over budget. However OPG does have a good track record in this regard, they recently completed a $12.8 billion nuclear refurbishment project that completed $150 million under budget and four months ahead of schedule.

Is Mandating AI Use in the Workplace Backfiring?

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Some workplaces are holding mandatory AI training sessions, while others “are requiring employees to use a specific number of tokens,” reports the Washington Post, “or log a certain amount of time on AI platforms.”

The article’s headline? “Why mandating AI use in the workplace can backfire.”
[A] lot of employers are going about it the wrong way, said Arvind Karunakaran, an assistant professor of management science and engineering at Stanford University. “You can consume a lot of tokens without creating a lot of value,” Karunakaran said....

The adoption of AI is happening faster than the adoption of the internet did, according to a new report from Stanford’s Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence. And many users report that AI tools have really helped — whether saving time and costs or increasing innovation. The same report, though, found that one-third of organizations surveyed expected AI-related staff reductions in the coming year. Especially in that context, simply mandating usage won’t spark excitement about the technology, Karunakaran said, and neither will insisting that employees use AI to cut turnaround times and ramp up productivity. “People start asking questions like ‘What am I as an employee getting out of it?’" he said.

The report he co-authored found that in the short-term, mandating AI tools may ramp up productivity. But in the long-to-medium term, employees tend to feel devalued and disengaged. From there, people find ways to mindlessly check the box.

When employers present these tools and their use as an opportunity for employees to expand their skills and grow their careers, people are much likelier to use them, Karunakaran said. He suggests that rather than requiring employees use a specific number of tokens, companies should encourage workers to experiment and share their own use cases and success stories. Most workplaces are still shutting employees out of the conversation. More than half of employees said they have less of a say than they’d want on adopting new tech at work, according to a report from Gallup and Jobs for the Future, a work and education nonprofit.
Any Slashdot readers want to share your own stories on how AI was introduced at your workplace?

“present as an opportunity”

By ffkom • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

When employers present these tools and their use as an opportunity for employees to expand their skills and grow their careers…

… those employers would just be lying, and many employees would see through this.

There is little “skill” in asking some AI agent to do something, and even if some employee meticulously formulates his prompts to optimize the effective use of the AI, this will go unnoticed by his supervisors, while at the same time a lot of general thinking skills shrink among the entirety of the population due to the outsourcing of thinking to AIs. The only growth their careers will see is a growth in free time due to unemployment or a growth in unpleasant physical work at minimum wage for those filling that gap until the robots get good enough also in physical work.

A waste of time

By uncoveror • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread
I work in IT Support at a federal agency. They have crammed IT into our ticketing system which is a tweaked version of ServiceNow. Its search tool drifts off topic faster than a conventional search engine, and if we let it write the conclusion section of our tickets, we have to do them over because they do not reflect the work that was done in order at all. AI complicates simple tasks and wastes time. That is the opposite of what computers are for.

Re:Working as intended

By ffkom • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Humans invented machines to do their work so they would have more free time.

Yes, and that is a good thing as long as humans own the machines that do their work. This time, however, humans do not own the machines that do their work, and their unemployment is a problem, because the machine owners have no reason to keep the no longer needed humans around (or even alive).

Just the Hawthorne Effect?

By SoftwareArtist • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

The report he co-authored found that in the short-term, mandating AI tools may ramp up productivity.

The Hawthorne Effect is based on a series of experiments in the 1920s and 30s. They tried varying lots of aspects of a work environment to see how it affected productivity, like lighting levels, break schedules, and whether workers were given snacks. They found that just about any change led to an increase in productivity, but only for a short time. Then it went back to where it started. The particular change didn’t really matter, only that you changed something, and that people knew they were being studied.

This report is likely something similar. If you make people work differently, for a short time they become more engaged. They may also be focused on proving to their manager they can use the new technology. But it doesn’t last. Productivity drops again. It’s a mistake to assume the effect had anything to do with the particular change you made.

stupid metrics

By bmajik • • Score: 3 • Thread

The only thing worse than not having metrics… … is having metrics.

Big companies are almost always stupid.

Organizations measure what is easy for them to measure, not what actually matters. The drift between what matters and what gets measured always produces dumb behaviors.

Measuring token usage is perhaps a proxy for “is this person trying to use AI?”. That question is only interesting if you are quite confident that at some point, your staff will be able to grow the business value they produce as a result of using AI.

What you actually should measure is business value delivered. Companies are bad at that (Because its difficult), So instead they Measure what is easy to measure, and they don’t test the assumption that AI helps staff deliver more BV.

At my small software company, having developers use Claude is delivering tremendous BV. We are getting higher quality PRs, code reviews, and built software, and we are getting it faster. We are getting MUCH faster bug investigations. Overall time to fix is down. We are shipping faster and we are paying down technical debt.

(we may be accumulating new technical debt we don’t see yet. time will tell)

Scientists Find Rare Meteorite From Mars With Signs of Ancient Water

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot
“I didn’t think a rock like this existed on Earth,” a geologist at the Lunar and Planetary Institute in Texas told the Washington Post. It looks like a polished rock, dark brown with a clay-colored stripe — but it’s actually one of the oldest Mars meteorites ever found, blasted by an impact from the surface of Mars billions of years ago:
Technically speaking it’s a collection of eight rock fragments, the largest of which is about the size of a fist. Nearly two pounds of the meteorite was discovered in the Sahara in Mali in 2022, and most is now held by a museum in Maine. Within two years, an initial examination determined the meteorite hailed from Mars; scientists are now finally digging deeper, with stunning results.
It offers records of “interactions of water and rock and maybe even an imprint of the Martian atmosphere as it was losing water,” says Lee Saper, co-author of a new paper recently published in Science. “It was only after we started looking closely that we realized this meteorite is really unique,” said Yang Liu of NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Southern California, the lead author of a new paper published in Science. “One of the paper’s reviewers called it a Rosetta Stone for Mars.”

Its mix of minerals “tells a story about how the planet’s crust formed from cooling magma before it was eventually altered by subsurface water,” NASA’s JPL says in an announcement. The Washington Post reports:
The story begins 4.1 billion years ago, when crystals of a mineral called zircon probably solidified out of molten magma on Mars. “That was a game changer,” [said Yang Liu, a planetary scientist at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in California], since scientists can date zircon very precisely, and it has been rare in other Mars meteorites. The date immediately put the Teghaza meteorite on special footing, alongside only two other Mars rocks known to have formed by 4 billion years ago…

Perhaps most intriguingly, the researchers also saw signs that the rock had been exposed to water during its evolution, a find detailed in work published this summer in Science Advances.