Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. As ‘Falcon Heavy’ Launches, SpaceX Plans Dragon and Falcon 9 Phase Out As Starship Ramps Up
  2. President Trump Doxxes Senator’s Cellphone in Push For Permanent Daylight Saving Time
  3. Steam On Linux - Down To 3.05% For September?
  4. Researcher, Dartmouth Professor and Provost Face Accusations of Secretly Using AI
  5. California’s Governor Wants Worker Protections from AI. But FSF Thinks Kill Switches are ‘Dangerous Precedent’
  6. Someone Got Doom In an SQL Database
  7. US Judge Rules Flock Search Was Mass Surveillance. Bernie Sanders Proposes ‘Ban Flock Act’
  8. 1 In 8 Cancer Cases Worldwide Are Due to Infections
  9. Google Tests AI Data Center In Space
  10. New Mexico Wants Meta To Pay $40 Billion In Penalties For Cambridge Analytica Scandal
  11. AI Has Finally Learned To Play Stratego
  12. The University of Washington Is Moving a Graduate Program to Microsoft’s Campus
  13. Apple Tightens macOS ‘Full Disk Access’ Controls As AI Agents ‘Substantially’ Increase Risk
  14. Paramount and Warner Bros. Discovery to Become Skydance
  15. Used Processor Leads To Game Ban

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

As ‘Falcon Heavy’ Launches, SpaceX Plans Dragon and Falcon 9 Phase Out As Starship Ramps Up

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Spaceflight Now reports:
“A SpaceX Falcon Heavy rocket launched from Florida Thursday night on a classified mission for the National Reconnaissance Office, America’s spy satellite agency… The NRO has previously flown payloads on 22 Falcon 9 rockets but this is the first time it has used the heavy-lift Falcon Heavy, which consists of three Falcon 9 boosters and an upper stage, topped by a payload fairing.

The powerful rocket, which lifts off under the power of 27 Merlin 1D engines, was introduced to great fanfare in 2018 and made its 14th flight Thursday night… NROL-97 was SpaceX’s third Falcon launch of the day. In addition to the Crew 13 mission, the company launched 130 payloads on the Transporter 13 rideshare mission from its West Coast pad at Vandenberg Space Force Base in California. It was the first time the company has landed four boosters in a single day.
CNN reports:
As Starship flights ramp up, SpaceX has made clear that the company will phase out the use of two of its most iconic creations: the Dragon spacecraft, which ferries astronauts and cargo to and from the International Space Station, and the Falcon 9 rocket, which for a decade has dominated the global launch market.

These vehicles not only revolutionized the space industry in their own way, they’re also still very much essential to ongoing work in Earth orbit, without clear backup options in place. The prospect of this loss is already spurring panic among some satellite operators, said Caleb Henry, director of research at analytics firm Quilty Space… Henry said he expects that most of the remaining space on board Falcon 9 rockets has already been sold and — beyond early 2029 — such flights may be reserved solely for the US government. Even NASA, which currently counts the Dragon capsule as the only US-made spacecraft capable of getting its astronauts to and from the ISS, has also acknowledged the looming retirement of SpaceX’s workhorse vehicles....

Despite the success of Falcon and Dragon, a peek at SpaceX’s business book may hint at financial reasons for retiring the vehicles. In its first quarterly earnings report, SpaceX revealed its space segment — which includes Falcon, Dragon and Starship — lost $542 million. By comparison, its Starlink internet and connectivity business made nearly $1.7 billion. Starship is expected to continue to cost SpaceX untold millions as it moves out of the prototyping phase. But one reason SpaceX is willing to bet big on Starship is that it’s simply “much better” for achieving the company’s own long-term goals, said SpaceX president Gwynne Shotwell at a recent conference. So it makes sense to shift resources toward the megarocket’s future....

This rocket supply crunch has been looming since 2022, when Russia invaded Ukraine — which immediately removed Russia’s Soyuz and Proton rockets from the commercial market, Henry noted. On top of that, Amazon — which is deploying a space-based internet constellation to rival SpaceX’s Starlink — stepped in to buy more than 100 launches from various rocket makers.... Though some satellite manufacturers are hopeful that space onboard future Starship launches will be offered to satellite operators, it’s not clear when or if that will happen.... It is possible that a launch supply crunch could be averted, noted Micah Walter-Range, a space analyst and contributor to the VettaFi Space Index. But satellite operators may be wary because newer rockets that have for years promised to step up to compete with the Falcon 9 have not yet begun flying with any regularity.

“The space industry hates uncertainty, particularly when it comes to planning of launches,” Walter-Range said.
The article notes that Rocket Lab, Firefly Aerospace, United Launch Alliance, and the Jeff Bezos-founded Blue Origin “have not yet reached the scale or launch cadence that the industry is demanding.”

President Trump Doxxes Senator’s Cellphone in Push For Permanent Daylight Saving Time

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
U.S. President Donald Trump “doxxed” a U.S. senator today, writes the Washington Sun, by posting his cell phone number “as part of a plea for his Truth Social followers to badger his Republican ally into making daylight saving time permanent.”
When The Washington Sun called the number minutes after Trump’s post, a recording said the mailbox was full and could not receive messages…

[Senator Tom] Cotton has long detested the idea of making daylight saving time permanent. In a Senate floor speech last year, Cotton said doing so would “make winter a dark and dismal time for millions of Americans,” particularly harming kids. The Senate was only able to unanimously pass the bill in 2022 because Cotton was reportedly unaware the vote was taking place, though the measure stalled out from there. The Arkansas Republican didn’t back down in a post on Saturday. “Arkansans don’t want their kids going to school in the pitch dark, and I’ll always put Arkansas first,” he posted on X.

Trump continued his tear against Cotton soon after. “If Tom Cotton were putting Arkansas first, he would give them an extra hour of daylight and, more importantly, they wouldn’t have to run all over their houses, farms, work places, and everywhere else, twice a year, having to change their Clocks, and often forgetting to do so,” he posted on Truth.

Haha

By ArchieBunker • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

Proving once again no one is safe from a tyrant.

No concept of the Golden Rule

By fahrbot-bot • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

Trump Doxxes Senator’s [Tom Cotton (R-AR)] Cellphone

Imagine how irate Trump would be if someone did this to him — or even half the stuff he does to others.

Exercised by anything

By hadleyburg • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread

Why is it that the discussion on almost any issue in the US makes it sound like a bad decision is some sort of existential threat?

Crazy idea here…

By afaiktoit • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread
If you dont want your kids going to school in the dark just change the school hours.

We already tried it

By kqs • • Score: 4, Informative • Thread

We tried year-round DST for a short time in the 70s. It was popular before it was passed, but… very very unpopular after it passed, because the mornings are very very dark and unpleasant. Good thing we learn from history rather than repeating it!

Steam On Linux - Down To 3.05% For September?

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Phoronix reports:
Steam on Linux use in March hit an all-time high of around 5.33% marketshare. Since then it pulled back to around 4% while for September 2026 the Steam Survey results… indicate a rather steep decline of 0.85%, down to 3.05%. Meanwhile macOS is at 1.92% and Microsoft Windows at 95%… Steam’s Survey reports a 7.42% increase in Chinese use, up to 31.39% overall of the Steam population. Usually those large month-over-month swings where Steam China use shoots up dramatically is a boost to Windows and a detriment to Linux. Some attribute the large increases in Simplified Chinese use to being a reporting/sampling issue.

When diving into the Steam Linux data exclusively, CachyOS has spiked by another 2.65% to now account for 18.12% of the sampled Linux gaming population. That even outperforms SteamOS Holo coming in at 17.37%. Among Linux gamers on Steam, AMD CPUs still account for the high 60 percentage space thanks to the Steam Deck and Steam Machine using AMD APUs and their open-source/Linux support being popular with enthusiasts.

Market share

By Vintermann • • Score: 3 • Thread

I suspect that “market share” is a lot about what kind of games heavy players are playing on Steam right now. March was when Slay the Spire 2 was released, a very Linux friendly game, popular with Linux demographics. Months where DRM-ridden MMOs or extraction shooter of the month dominates - which is most of them - will see lower Linux use.

Researcher, Dartmouth Professor and Provost Face Accusations of Secretly Using AI

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
“The winner of the Nikon Small World in Motion competition is under investigation,” writes the photography news site PetaPixel , “after scientists accused Dr Ning Xu of using AI in his video.”
The Nikon competition is about showcasing the beauty, complexity, and artistry of the microscopic world. The entries are abstract, often baffling to laypeople. But when Dr Xu was announced as the winner last month, members of the scientific community began to cry foul. “There are many serious problems with this video,” Edward Phelps, associate professor at Florida University, says on LinkedIn. Phelps points out that “purple structures pop in and out of existence” and “green cilia also appear from nowhere and do not match the known size.”

Dr Xu’s video is supposed to show the movement of cilia, which are hair-like structures that line part of the lungs… However, since Dr Xu won the prize, Nikon Small World updated its LinkedIn post celebrating his triumph with a note that reads: “Regarding questions raised about this year’s Small World In Motion winning video, Nikon is carefully re-reviewing the information provided during the initial vetting, along with additional supporting materials from the entrant.” Nikon adds that Dr Xu is “respectfully complying and has provided detailed technical documentation outlining the microscopy equipment, imaging methods, and processing techniques used to create the source video.”

Worse still, Ian Donovan, an MD/PhD Student at UT Southwestern Medical Center, says he ran the video through Google Gemini, and the result came back with an invisible Google SynthID watermark that indicates at least some of the video is AI-generated. Dr Xu, an optical engineering researcher at the National University of Singapore, reportedly responded to the LinkedIn post. According to Nature, Dr Xu accepted that he had used an AI model to assist with post-processing but denied breaking the rules of the competition, which clearly state that “AI-generated videos are not permitted.”

“It was applied afterwards to the reconstructed grayscale data to distinguish and color structures with similar morphology,” he wrote. However, Dr Xu’s messages on the LinkedIn post can’t be found as of today (October 1), and his LinkedIn profile now appears to have been deleted entirely.
Meanwhile, some college students “see a double standard when colleges penalize them for outsourcing academic work to AI but allow similar use by institutional leaders,” writes Entrepreneur magazine:
According to a recent report from The New York Times, Dartmouth College students are calling out a top professor for allegedly using AI to help with writing… The school’s provost, Santiago Schnell, faced allegations of AI use last week from the college’s student-run newspaper, which detected AI in some of his published writing. The college said it was launching an investigation into the written work. Schnell said in a statement to the student-run newspaper, The Dartmouth, that he used AI “for language refinement, copyediting, improving clarity and organization and making writing processes more efficient.” The newspaper ran his statement through an AI detector, which said that Schnell had used AI to write it, too.

California’s Governor Wants Worker Protections from AI. But FSF Thinks Kill Switches are ‘Dangerous Precedent’

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
The Guardian reports that California governor Gavin Newsom signed laws on Wednesday “aimed at protecting California workers from the threats of artificial intelligence , including potential job losses and workplace surveillance.”
The laws ban employers from using the technology to predict a worker’s emotional state by using their biometric data, require employers to send written notices to workers if AI is responsible for mass layoffs and ban employers from relying on AI to decide to fire someone… The governor signed a law this month requiring operators of AI chatbots to perform risk assessments before rolling them out and an executive order requiring the state to consult with experts to further improve oversight over the industry.
The law includes “expanded tracking of AI’s economic effects” leading to recommendations on how to best “adapt job-training and public-benefit programs,” according to the governor’s office. “California has also launched an AI Unemployment Tracker and solicited statewide public input on AI’s economic impacts through Engaged California.”

But two weeks ago Politico reported that the governor also signed executive orders to “explore proposals like requiring that AI companies develop a ‘kill switch’ for their most advanced models.”
Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei, who called for a slowdown in AI development amid existential risk concerns, said… that while a kill switch “could be a good idea,” it was no “panacea....” [California lawmakers] were generally supportive of Newsom’s plan and showed signs of coalescing around the kill switch idea, which was stripped out of legislation proposed two years ago. Rep. Ted Lieu, who introduced bipartisan kill switch legislation in the House, boosted Newsom’s call for Congress to mirror California’s approach.
But not everyone supports this approach, including the Free Software Foundation’s campaigns manager, Greg Farough:
FSF: Having control over the technology we use is a fundamental part of software freedom. Without it, you simply don’t have the basic freedoms you deserve when doing any type of computing, large or small. Don’t let “artificial intelligence” be an exception: all users everywhere deserve complete control over their own computing. While it’s understandable to be pleased by this news from California, Newsom’s executive order also invites questions about the “kill switch” itself that could matter a great deal for freedom. Assuming such a kill switch was developed, who would really control it?

We hope our readers understand the problems inherent in giving one single or a small number of kill switches to anyone. Newsom wisely wants an independent organization to verify their functionality, but even this still sets too dangerous of a precedent. We cannot allow such centralization of power over our computing to become commonplace, especially by the corporations that provide these models in the first place. We also cannot trust even the most well-intentioned “independent organization” to take care of its verification.

Giving users the freedom that they deserve over large languages models would be an enormous departure from how most are developed and used today. But, if any group is capable of coming up with such a plan, it’s the experts mentioned in Newsom’s order. Like he states at the beginning of his executive order, the vast majority of them are already right there in California. We urge the Government Operations Agency to consider the precedent they are setting, and ask them to write their recommendation to the governor in ways that puts the freedom and dignity of the individual user first and foremost.
The Guardian adds that Newsom also signed an executive order this week “to require state agencies to continue to refer to the technology as ‘artificial intelligence’ instead of the term ‘super intelligence’ as Donald Trump recently ordered US diplomats to use.”

Its a trap!

By Brain-Fu • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

The AI “kill switch” sounds like a great idea to people who don’t understand the tech. It sounds like a really obvious “given,” that makes them think technicians are idiots for not having already baked one in. So legislation like this will be popular among that demographic.

Warnings about its dangers need to be stated in a way that they will understand. Like maybe “All AI models already have a kill switch: the computer’s power cord. The government wants a new kill switch to turn off your computer over the internet against your will.” Something simple and direct like that helps them to realize that this word doesn’t mean what they think it means.

We already have a kill switch solution

By Waffle Iron • • Score: 3 • Thread

It’s a paper copy of underground utility records and a backhoe.

Re:Its a trap!

By ceoyoyo • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

As far as I can tell nobody really has any consistent idea what “kill switch” is supposed to mean. Eg. https://www.scientificamerican…

OpenAI and Anthropic already have kill switches, from the power cord through to account bans. If they don’t want anyone using their model they can do that. Likewise, if the US government is sufficiently motivated to order a service provider to stop providing that service, they can absolutely do that. I get the feeling the actual companies are hoping they can implement something that has lots of buzzwords and does sort of what their “guard rails” do, and everyone will stop bugging them about it.

Naturally the FSF imagines some hypothetical technology that allows the government to reach into your home to shut off the matrix multiplies running on your own computer.

Those aren’t threats from AI

By peterww • • Score: 3 • Thread

They’re threats from humans. Humans decide to use the AI to spy on you. Humans decide to replace your job with AI. Protections for human workers should exist without needing the word “AI” in it.

“requiring operators of AI chatbots to perform risk assessments before rolling them out” - Again, wrong target. Humans need to *use the tools carefully*. A knife is sharp because the knife needs to be sharp to be useful. Don’t blunt the knife; require the user to be careful with it.

Having a kill switch on AI is like having a kill switch on the internet. You’re missing the forest for the trees if you think that’s a solution.

Someone Got Doom In an SQL Database

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica:
Rendering Doom in a database is obviously a bad idea,” Lukas Vogel writes in a lengthy blog post explaining how exactly he managed to render Doom using an SQL database. OK, that’s not entirely accurate. The SQLDoom project uses a small Python client to handle input and output, drive the game’s timing, and display each frame to the screen. Behind that, a series of CedarDB tables tracks the game geometry and state, while about 1,300 lines of SQL queries spread across 89 common table expressions implement the game logic and generate 35 bitmap framebuffers per second.

In this, SQLDoom is a major improvement over Vogel’s previous DoomQL project, which last year set out to build “a multiplayer Doom-like shooter entirely in SQL.” Unfortunately, that effort ended up with raycasting-based, grayscale ASCII graphics that were more akin to the simplistic 90-degree-angled maps of Wolfenstein 3D. The newer SQLDoom, on the other hand, generates full-color 640x480 frames that look like they could have come from the original Doom executable. […] If you want to run a Doomtabase on your own local machine, you can do so simply with the GitHub code, a copy of CedarDB, and a Doom WAD file. Or you can jump into a free online hosted demo match to test it out without all the setup […].

US Judge Rules Flock Search Was Mass Surveillance. Bernie Sanders Proposes ‘Ban Flock Act’

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Flock’s cameras offer “indiscriminate mass surveillance,” a U.S. federal judge wrote in a ruling Thursday, as does any system with “continuously updated” location histories for all the vehicles filmed by automated license plate-reading cameras.

The judge’s ruling included italics for emphasis when describing “the question of why is it the government’s business where everyone goes all the time?”
Judge Hill: We might reasonably expect our friends and family to tell us something like: “Hey, I saw you out driving by the store last week.” But we do not expect people we know — let alone strangers, and especially not law enforcement — to randomly approach us to say: “Hey, I have been following your car for the last 30 days, and here is a detailed log of every place your vehicle has been with supporting photographic evidence. I am also going to share this information with law enforcement throughout the country so they know your whereabouts, too....”

Cell phones also move in public places where people can see you in plain view. But it becomes constitutionally problematic when law enforcement can indiscriminately and passively catalog your whereabouts over an extended period of time and then use that information for any purpose whenever convenient… [I]t is also consequential that we are not just dealing with stationary cameras. The cameras on [police officer] Alaniz’s vehicle itself feed information into these systems… It is also no longer difficult to imagine law enforcement using a fleet of drones hovering over an entire city so they don’t miss the movement of a single vehicle.
Officer Alaniz had used Flock’s travel history for a car when deciding to pull over its driver, which eventually led to a vehicle search and charges of possessing drugs with intent to distribute. But the judge wrote that because this violated reasonable expectation of privacy, “all evidence obtained after Alaniz initiated the ALPR search must be suppressed as fruit of the poisonous tree.” The judge granted a motion to “suppress all evidence obtained as a result of these unconstitutional searches and seizures.”

The Washington Post got this comment from a Flock spokesperson about the judge’s ruling: “we expect it will be appealed and ultimately overturned.” (Flock’s spokesperson added that the ruling “does not set controlling precedent and does not affect law enforcement agencies’ continued use of these important public safety technologies.”)

But meanwhile, on Friday U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders introduced the Ban Flock Act. The proposed bill bans federal agencies in America from using automated license plate reader systems “without explicit statutory authorization”. The bill also lets certain federal agencies (including the Homeland Security Department) withhold grant money from State and local governments that use automatic license plate readers.

TechCrunch reports:
Despite its title, the bill doesn’t call out Flock in the text and covers any and all ALPR systems. The bill allows exceptions only for toll collection and for uses that Congress approves in future legislation, which would have to limit data retention to no longer than 48 hours.... Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) and Senator Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) are co-sponsors.

short sighted

By guygo • • Score: 4 • Thread

“limit data retention to no longer than 48 hours.” Yeah, right. Who is going to enforce THAT caveat, and how? Ban ‘em all.

You can’t ban them all

By rsilvergun • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread
Too many voters are obsessed with tough on crime. It’s politically impossible.

Go look at some midterm ads right now attacking the Democrats and every single one of them will be going after them for either being radical socialists or weak on crime or both.

The Republicans do the same thing every time, they make a law often one that’s already there with a few extremely minor changes that does something like make it illegal to be a pedophile or something when it’s obviously already is, than they add something in it the Democrats can’t vote for usually banning birth control or criminalizing abortion or something. The Democrats vote against the law because of course they do it’s got a poison pill in it and then the Republicans run on such and such politician voted to let predators attack your children or something.

I am older than dirt and they have been doing this bullshit since I was a kid and since before that I’m sure and voters always fall for it.

Keep in mind that only gets the Republicans to about 45% but voter suppression can make up the other 6% and winner take all voting means they can win elections without winning elections. What some might call cheating… Or election interference if you’re kind of dumb and don’t just want to use the existing term voter suppression.

So anyway the point is the Democrats are constantly walking a minefield where they can’t just ban things that sane and intelligent people don’t want. And the Republicans are just fascists at this point.

It is funny watching a bunch of old people showing up at Community meetings where data centers are being rammed through and watching those people realize that after 50 years of undermining democracy for stupid reasons they no longer have a proper functioning democracy so they don’t really have a say in anything. I’ve seen a couple of cases where people are just dumbfounded because the data centers are getting built and there’s nothing they can do about it because they’re too stupid to stop voting for people who are going to let the data center is be built so their communities are just fucked.

But during the elections they’ll get scared of some trans girls or violent video games or whatever moral panic there is or they will get scared of the socialists or they’ll get confused by advertisements about week on crime and then they will once again vote against what they actually want. And again that’s only about 45% of the country that’s that stupid but voter suppression works.

Re:Damn…

By drinkypoo • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

America had a republic until Lincolns’ War of Northern Aggression.

Oh look, it’s the hipster maggot come along to tell us all how great slavery was.

Too late, Bernie

By PPH • • Score: 3 • Thread

We’ve already seen those photos of you in your Audi R8.

1 In 8 Cancer Cases Worldwide Are Due to Infections

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
An estimated 2.3 million cancer cases worldwide in 2024, about one in eight, were attributable to infections, according to a study published in The Lancet Oncology. “This recent Lancet data is a profound reminder that a significant portion of our global cancer burden is fundamentally preventable,” said David Greenberg, MD, of Hackensack Meridian Jersey Shore University Medical Center, in a news release. “We have historically siloed infectious diseases and oncology, but they are deeply intertwined. By shifting our focus toward aggressive infection control, we can literally vaccinate and treat our way out of millions of future cancer diagnoses.” From a report:
The study found that an estimated 2.3 million new cancer cases were attributable to infections globally in 2024, equivalent to 12% of all cancer cases. Of these, the largest number (760,000 cases, or 4%) were caused by H. pylori, followed by HPV (750,000 cases, or 4%), HBV (360,000 cases, or 2%), EBV (260,000 cases, or 1%) and HCV (160,000 cases). More than three quarters of infection-attributable cancers occurred in low- and middle-income countries. Eastern Asian had the largest burden, with 990,000 cases (42% of the global total). Rates were also higher than the global average in sub-Saharan Africa, Central and Eastern Europe and Southeast Asia.

Re: Universities teaching the ‘truth’

By OrangeTide • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Papers get ridiculed when the data is not reproducible or does not support the claims. Not because the medical industry can’t make huge profits sell baking soda. Papers are written and published because that’s how you get ahead in academics. If there is a simple miracle cure for cancer, there are a thousand hungry PhDs and students willing to write papers on it.

Re:Universities teaching the ‘truth’

By Anonymous Coward • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

I recall some Italian doctor mentioned acidity as a cause of cancer like 20 years ago. But this does not match with what is taught at universities so he was ridiculed into an early retirement. Even Dutch scientists found that ordinary baking powder was able to cure some types of cancer. They abandoned the whole project because they could not find a way to patent ordinary baking powder. Being indoctrinated on universities bout what is the truth and then working for BigPharma doesn’t contribute much as they’d rather put you on a lifetime supply of medicine instead of curing you.

And without data you’re convinced this is correct. Gullibility is hurting this world.

Re:Universities teaching the ‘truth’

By Rei • • Score: 4, Informative • Thread

The human body is eminintly capable of controlling its internal pH. Arterial blood is maintained within a very precise pH range, 7.35 to 7.45. Bicarbonate buffers, protein buffers, and phosphate buffers react within seconds. Respiratory response (increased or decreased breathing rate, to adjust blood CO2 levels), in minutes. The renal system (pumping H+ to or from the urine, and generating or recovering bicarbonate) in hours or days. Food intake has essentially zero impact on pH. The stomach is always extreme, and food leaving it is immediately neutralized by sodium bicarbonate from the pancreas. Metabolism can generate free acids, but the amount is far less than the kidneys are capable of handling. You cannot make your blood more or less acidic with diet.

I hope this helps, and please learn to be more skeptical of what you read online.

Re:We’re probably going to find more

By Rei • • Score: 4, Informative • Thread

Deeply, deeply misleading comment.

First off, you’re using a denominator fallacy. Yes, we have discovered over 200 types of HPV. Gardasil 9 targets 9 types, and numerically, yes, 9 / 200+ ~= 4-5%. But most of the 200 known types of HPV are rare and/or irrelevant (causing ordinary warts on fingers, knees, and feet, with extremely low odds of cancer). Only 40 types infect the mucosal/genital tract, and of those, only 12-14 are high risk. Gardasil 9 targets the 7 strains responsible for 90% of all cervical cancers, as well as types 6 and 11, that cause 90% of genital warts.

Secondly: cervical cancer indeed tends to happen in middle-aged women. But the disease itself is typically acquired in the teens or 20s. It’s oncogenesis that takes decades to happen. Vaccination protects women of all ages.

I will however, admit that your claim that it “doesn’t even target the HPV most likely to cause throat cancer in men” isn’t misleading. Rather than being misleading, it’s just simply false. HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer is caused overwhelmingly by Type 16 (85-90% of all HPV-positive throat cancers). Even the original 4-variant Gardacil covered Type 16.

And, do I even need to add, that the claim that “Gardasil fatalities will have killed more teens than prevented deaths of women” is sheer unadulterated bullshit? There has been ZERO causal link found between Gardacil vaccination and death, by any major health organization (WHO, CDC, or EMA). This more stupid “I DiD mY oWn ReSeArCh” VAERS bullshit, where even a person dying in a car accident after getting vaccinated gets a report. VAERS isn’t controlled. Stop pretending that it is. It flags signals for controlled research. It is not itself controlled research. Controlled research does not link Gardacil and death.

You know what the most common significant adverse reaction to Gardacil is? Vasocagal syncope. Sounds pretty terrifying, until you learn that that is “fainting from needle anxiety”.

Check Falcaro et al, 2021, studying HPV vaccination in the UK - there’s been an 87% reduction in cervical cancer rates and a 97% reduction in precancerous lesions. Australia is on track to effectively eliminate cervical cancer as a public health issue within a decade.
  vaccination coverage.

Also, do I even have to get into how stupid the notion of “get cancer, but then cure it” is? Cancer does damage. “Cures” do damage. Pain, infertility, disfigurement, etc. Your notion is “rely on some theoretical (deeply doubted by most researchers) notion of imminent magical perfect AI cancer cures” because of your ridiculous not-at-all-scientifically-backed antivax bullshit about a treatment that has been immensely effective and immensely safe.

Re: Universities teaching the ‘truth’

By thegarbz • • Score: 4, Informative • Thread

And yet we’ve “cured” several sources of cancer preventatively because people are actively researching and producing such cures. I assume you’re an anti-vaxxer and haven’t heard of the HPV vaccine? Or the HepB/C vaccine which eliminates one of the most common causes of liver cancer? Your UID is low enough that presumably no one has shoved a camera in your arse yet, lucky you (or unlucky depending if you’re into that), but colonoscopies have basically eliminated 90% of colorectal cancer in the west. All of this based on a history of medical research.

Sorry that your conspiracy doesn’t line up with real life.

Google Tests AI Data Center In Space

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Longtime Slashdot reader Geoffrey.landis shares a report from NPR:
Google just put a refrigerator-sized satellite into space, part of a research project the company hopes can pave the way for orbiting AI data centers powered by the sun. The prototype satellite has four specialty chips in it called Tensor Processing Units, or TPUs, that Google designed for machine learning and has already deployed in data centers on Earth. The chips will run a version of the company’s Gemma AI model for 15 minutes at a time due to heat management constraints, using the open weight model to answer simple queries.

In a blog post, Google said the mission will gauge how the TPUs handle “the physical stress of spaceflight and the radiation and thermal extremes of space.” The satellite launched October 1 is a prototype that Travis Beals, senior director and lead of Project Suncatcher, called “a very minimal test” to make sure the chips can run in space. A SpaceX rocket carried it into orbit, and Planet will get it up and running. Beal said Google will then fire up and test the TPUs. The goal is for the mission to be operational for a year.

Re:If they are thermally efficient enough

By gweihir • • Score: 4, Informative • Thread

That has nothing to do with the topic, and everything to do with the Dunning-Kruger Effect. Obviously you are trying to sling FUD.

In the case at hand, data-centers in space make zero sense at our current stage of technology because of multiple, very bad parameters that we cannot work around. That will not change for the foreseeable future and these problems are fundamental, not in the details. (There are really bad problems in the details as well…) Fundamental problems can be verified by smart and well-educated people even when they are not experts in the subject.

Re:If they are thermally efficient enough

By gweihir • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

Cooling, communication, debris, cost of shipping to orbit, cost of station-keeping, power-generation (no, solar in space is not magic), cosmic radiation, needed size of the satellites, very easy to destroy, etc., etc.. The list of why this is a REALLY stupid idea is endless.

There is not a single aspect of this were the idea is actually good. All it does is tickle the imagination of the clueless. And that is exactly why it gets pushed.

Re:If they are thermally efficient enough

By dfghjk • • Score: 4, Informative • Thread

Correct, it has utterly nothing to do with the topic. It is a characteristic of /. and of the OP.

I am in my 60s, these problems were known in the space program when I was a child, almost certainly known well before that. The topic is a joke, it only exists because Elon Musk is a moron, as are Silicon Valley billionaires generally. Anyone can be an expert on this subject, it is completely known.

There’s a very different reason for this

By Arrogant-Bastard • • Score: 3 • Thread
Nobody can march down the street and burn them down.

The fascist oligarchs behind the AI/data center scam know that the public hates these and that eventually, it will occur to someone to torch one of them. That’s not going to be so easy if they’re in orbit.

This has nothing to do with research or innovation or anything else: it’s pure self-preservation.

This is a stock price ploy

By memory_register • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Google knows full well this makes no sense, but Elon Musk said we would put data centers in space so everyone has to act like they will do it too. Heaven forbid Wall Street catches on early to the data center debt bomb.

New Mexico Wants Meta To Pay $40 Billion In Penalties For Cambridge Analytica Scandal

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Reuters:
The state of New Mexico asked a judge on Thursday to order Meta Platforms to pay between $35 billion and $40 billion in penalties after a jury found the company had misled consumers about the privacy of their data on Facebook in a case that came out of the Cambridge Analytica scandal.

Attorneys for New Mexico made the request at a hearing in a lawsuit brought following revelations that the British political consulting firm, which worked on Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign, harvested personal data from as many as 87 million Facebook users through a third-party app without their consent. The jury returned its verdict on September 25. Judge Francis Mathew, who oversaw the trial in Santa Fe, will decide how much Meta must pay in financial penalties. […] State law allows the judge to decide how much to fine Meta per violation, up to $5,000. At the hearing on Thursday, Randi McGinn, a lawyer for New Mexico, said applying the full $5,000 penalty to the number of violations would create too large of a penalty under the US Constitution’s protections on due process. But the judge should order a significant payment that will impact the company, McGinn said.

“This court should speak to Meta in the only language it understands, which is money, and the value of its stock price,” McGinn said. She said $35 billion to $40 billion, which represents about 20% of the possible penalties that could be awarded under state law from the verdict, would impact the stock price while complying with Meta’s right to due process under the Constitution. At the hearing on Thursday, Matt Nicholson, a lawyer for Meta, called the state’s request an “astronomical penalty that would obviously violate a host of constitutional provisions.” In court filings, Meta urged Mathew to cap the penalties at $3.45 billion. The jury may have said it found Meta’s statements misleading, but the evidence shows that Meta does not sell user data and New Mexico did not prove that any consumer had actually been misled, the company said in court filings. The judge said he expected to issue a ruling later this month.

Elections are cheap

By john83 • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
Are you a multi-billionaire? Why not buy your own legislature? It’s a long term investment with spectacular dividends.

Won’t someone please think of the shareholders

By NotEmmanuelGoldstein • • Score: 3 • Thread
Media and tech corporations have several $billion cash but if IIRC, the biggest fine they’ve suffered was $1.1 billion: While that might be a worrisome chunk of their wealth, it’s still rainy-day money. Even the largest fine ever demanded by the US government, $4.3 billion, won’t empty the piggy-bank. Given those numbers, the judgement to come from the US DoJ will be much less than the $35 billion suggested as adequate punishment. Anything less than, at a guess, $14 billion, will be the cost of doing business. It’s why the standard DoJ fine of a few hundred $million for corporate malfeasance is so galling to the victims and totally pointless.

Re:Elections are cheap

By dbialac • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread
Can’t disagree more with the penalty. $250 billion seems more in the right range for Zuckerburg to to get the message. $3.45 billion is a tax rideoff. $250 billion is a “Wow, we really fucked up. We need to permanently change our practices.” Make it, intentionally, payable at a rate of about $25 billion per year so that every year there’s a reminder to stop doing the psychopath things they’ve been doing to make money and make it honestly.

Excessive fine under 8A?

By Sloppy • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

Randi McGinn, a lawyer for New Mexico, said applying the full $5,000 penalty to the number of violations would create too large of a penalty under the US Constitution’s protections on due process.

I ass/u/me this refers to the Eighth Amendment, but I don’t remember seeing any monetary constants encoded within that text.

Google’s telling me Meta is worth about $1.8 trillion so how would a mere $40B be “excessive?” It’s only about 2% of their worth! Civil penalties in excess of 2% of someone’s worth are routinely accepted as constitutional, aren’t they? If this case were about me driving drunk and killing a whole family, I bet no one would flinch at the 8A implications of taking 2% (!?!) of my assets, and everyone would laugh at my lawyer if he brought up 8A for such an insignificant fine.

I understand why we have 8A, and everyone deserves mercy, but I don’t see why Meta deserves exceptional mercy as a singular special case that we would be horrified to see applied anywhere else. Bringing up 8A for such a tiny fine would be giving Meta a very unique carve-out that we normally would not apply.

It may be that $5k is too much to charge criminals per act, in that each crime didn’t really cause that much loss, but bringing up due process concerns seems like bullshit when the fine is already so small. NM and Meta had been trying to negotiate the cost of illegal business for years before negotiations failed and it went to trial. Meta decided to let a jury decide, and the jury’s come up with a fairly tiny fraction of their assets.

If Meta thinks the price of illegal business is still too high, then they can lower the number of willful violations they commit per year, to optimize the advantage they gain from illegal actions at an affordable rate.

Geez, Zuck, just do less of it. If $40B seems like a lot, then maybe try only $10B worth of crime next time. What’s the big deal? Live and learn. After this little fine you still have 98% of the company left to go on and incur the next wave of liabilities.

AI Has Finally Learned To Play Stratego

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Researchers from Carnegie Mellon, MIT, NYU, and Stanford have built an AI called Ataraxos that finally cracked Stratego, beating four-time world champion Pim Niemeijer 15 games to one with four draws. Its key advantage was a second neural network that estimates the identities of hidden enemy pieces, letting the system search plausible game states rather than brute-force a massive hidden-information space. Ars Technica reports:
Just like [DeepMind’s DeepNash, introduced in 2022], Ataraxos learned by playing against itself — 163 million games in total. In these self-play sessions, moves that led to wins were reinforced and played more often in future matches, while moves that led to losses were played less, which was the same simple training idea. The difference was in how much Ataraxos adjusted after each game, because hidden information tends to send self-play learning algorithms around in circles. The team addressed this by making big, bold changes in strategy early in training and small, careful ones later.

The even bigger innovation was something DeepNash never had: thinking ahead before each move. AIs like AlphaGo refine their general strategy with a search just before acting. DeepMind couldn’t make that work in Stratego because the search space was too large, leaving it an open question whether it was worth trying. “This is one of the things that we did figure out how to do,” Farina said. The solution was a second neural network, a belief model, trained to guess the opponent’s hidden pieces based on how they had been moving. This way, instead of iterating through every possible arrangement, Ataraxos samples plausible ones, plays out candidate moves in each, and picks based on how they turned out. And it shows in its playstyle.

[…] DeepNash was trained for two to three months on 1,024 of Google’s specialized chips, a run the Ataraxos team estimates would cost $3 million to $4.5 million at 2025 prices. Ataraxos, in contrast, needed 16 GPUs for a week, plus an additional four GPUs for four days to train the belief model. Farina and lead author Samuel Sokota achieved this efficiency by writing a simulator that runs millions of moves per second on graphics cards. “At the scale that we are in academia, we don’t really have access to an entire field of GPUs,” Farina said. The algorithm also learned far faster — it played about 34 times fewer games than DeepNash, and still ended up much stronger.
The findings have been published in the journal Nature.

Fascinating…

By ffkom • • Score: 3 • Thread
This is the first time I saw “Stratego” mentioned for 40 years or so… never knew this game received attention among those aged above 12 or so. I can vaguely remember playing it a few times in childhood… are there specific countries where this is popular among adults?

They tried teaching it Risk

By rsilvergun • • Score: 3 • Thread
But after 10 million compute hours it’s still setting up the board.

The University of Washington Is Moving a Graduate Program to Microsoft’s Campus

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Longtime Slashdot submitter theodp writes:
GeekWire
reports that the University of Washington has moved its Global Innovation Exchange {GIX) program to Microsoft’s campus in a rent-free deal (UW News release). GIX, an institute supporting tech leaders that offers an MS in Technology Innovation, is the first UW program to set up full-time operations at Microsoft, whose headquarters are just across Lake Washington from the university’s main campus. Microsoft provided a $42 million in-kind donation to establish the embedded facility; the UW is leasing the new 48,500-square-foot GIX space in Microsoft’s Building 92 rent-free. GIX debuted in 2015 as a partnership of the UW and China’s Tsinghua University and received $70 million in Microsoft support at the now-abandoned GIX location in Bellevue (the Steve Ballmer Building), although indications are that a long-term arrangement did not come together as intended.

In a Thursday LinkedIn post, Microsoft President Brad Smith wrote: “Last night we opened a door unlike any other. At the heart of Microsoft’s campus, step into the new home of the UW’s Global Innovation Exchange (GIX) and you cross from Microsoft into the University of Washington. No one has ever put a great research university and a leading technology company under the same roof quite like this. As far as I know, no one has even tried. The timing matters. Artificial intelligence is advancing fast. The question is whether the people building it understand the world it’s changing. This calls for a new style of education and leadership. We need leaders who understand the technology deeply and see things through other people’s eyes. Leaders who learn by collaborating on real projects with people from different countries and disciplines. That’s what GIX is built for. Students will learn from faculty across the UW, take classes taught by Microsoft employees, and be mentored by people from across our industry here in the Pacific Northwest.”

Interestingly, Smith’s contention that UW GIX students will benefit from a ‘new style’ of Microsoft and industry-influenced education sounds a lot like Smith’s contention that K-12 school children are better off thanks to a new style of Microsoft and industry-influenced education. In an interview last month, Coding Kids: Big Tech’s Battle to Remake Public Schools author Natasha Singer told NPR (podcast, transcript), “For my book, I spoke to Brad Smith, who’s the president of Microsoft, and he has been one of the leaders in the tech industry pushing for [K-12] computer science [and now AI literacy] in schools. […] And Brad Smith said, philanthropy in the private sector is doing this work because public schools have failed to do what they were supposed to do. And his view is that public schools should be teaching modern subjects like computer science, and they were not equipped to do it fast enough and the tech industry stepped in to help. And is it better than if schools were able to do this themselves? He said, no, but it’s certainly better than nothing. And he said to me, you know, think about where we would be on computer science if the tech industry hadn’t stepped up. […] Well, I’ve been having this conversation with him for 10 years, and when we started having it 10 years ago, I said to him, I get that, but when big tech companies put their finger on the scale, it tips education in certain ways that not only favor the tech industry but can obscure equally or more important things.”

So, is “The University of Washington at Microsoft” a good or bad idea?

This shit needs to stop

By jenningsthecat • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

I get that there need to be ties between industry and higher education. But the kind of integration between education and business described in TFS is just more of Big Tech co-opting education for its own gain. It’s a kind of indoctrination. Students in higher education are supposed to specialize in a subject, not in a fucking company.

Apple Tightens macOS ‘Full Disk Access’ Controls As AI Agents ‘Substantially’ Increase Risk

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Apple says it will tighten macOS Full Disk Access controls as increasingly capable AI agents raise the risks of apps gaining broad access to users’ files, messages, mail, and browsing history. TechCrunch reports:
Days after a journalist claimed that Meta’s Muse app on Mac read their private messages — a claim that Meta disputed — Apple announced that it’s introducing additional controls around a setting called “Full Disk Access” on macOS. The feature was designed to allow backups to function properly, but AI agents have now increased “the risks associated with this level of access,” Apple said. […] In Muse’s case, the AI optionally allows users to enable Full Disk Access. This setting, Apple explains, gives an app permission to access files, mail, messages, and even browsing history.

“Some developers are using Full Disk Access in ways that could put users at risk, exposing everything on their systems… without users’ full knowledge and understanding,” Apple said in a new blog post aimed at developers. The company says that, going forward, it will introduce new controls aimed at ensuring that users who “genuinely wish to grant an app this extraordinary level of access” can do so only with “every explicit user action.”

“Addressing this is critical. As AI agents become increasingly capable and autonomous, the risks associated with this level of access will grow substantially. We are committed to ensuring users clearly understand these risks before granting such access, so they can make informed decisions about their own data and privacy,” Apple wrote.

Correct. And oh, no.

By abulafia • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
This looks like the final cell-phonification of the Mac. I’m bummed.

But they’re right - if you assume that a significant fraction of Mac users are going to install some sort of third-party interface with an LLM, it is either significantly extend and harden the security perimeter deeper into the OS or your customers will routinely have everything exfiled as a matter of course, and it would just be cheaper to make iCloud into an anonymous FTP site.

And given Zuckerbook’s demonstrated willingness to brazenly, actively subvert OSes, I’m willing to bet they’re going to go Russian on their subjects, er, customers, anyway. (“You probe with bayonets: if you find mush, you push.”)

It will probably be what finally pushes me to a Linux laptop, though. I’m old, I spend a lot of time at the shell. I like Macs because they’re great unix workstations, still. But I don’t see how you can accommodate both people like me and people who need to be protected not only from themselves, but from Zuckerbook and worse.

And they’re a much bigger market than people like me. And “AI is the Footure.”

Re:Correct. And oh, no.

By EvilSS • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

This looks like the final cell-phonification of the Mac. I’m bummed.

How do you figure that? From the Apple post: “Going forward, we will introduce additional controls to ensure that users who genuinely wish to grant an app this extraordinary level of access can only do so with very explicit user action. "

It’s already a OS controlled permission today. You will still be able to enable it for an app if you really want, they just want to make tighten the gate up to make sure you really want to and don’t blind-click though. Seems like a reasonable compromise to me.

Re: Correct. And oh, no.

By OrangeTide • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

Until systemd decides otherwise.

Re:Correct. And oh, no.

By dgatwood • • Score: 4, Funny • Thread

This looks like the final cell-phonification of the Mac. I’m bummed.

How do you figure that? From the Apple post: “Going forward, we will introduce additional controls to ensure that users who genuinely wish to grant an app this extraordinary level of access can only do so with very explicit user action. "

The word was *every*. *Every* explicit user action.

Oh, bloody hell. I just got rage-baited by incompetent Slashdot editors.

Good night. I’m done for the day.

Re:Correct. And oh, no.

By HiThere • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread

FWIW, I have two user accounts for different purposes. I once had three, but I stopped doing that one. My main user account has read access to the specialized one, but that one doesn’t have any access permissions to the main one. It can be a bit of a nuisance, but it feels (and should be) a lot safer.

Paramount and Warner Bros. Discovery to Become Skydance

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Paramount and Warner Bros. Discovery will operate under the Skydance name once their roughly $110 billion merger closes, which is expected on October 6. The combined company will bring together Paramount+, HBO Max, CBS, CNN, MTV and other networks, along with major franchises including The Lord of the Rings, Game of Thrones, DC and Yellowstone.

Ellison said the Paramount and Warner Bros. brands will remain prominent. “We never wanted a new corporate identity to diminish, alter or overshadow either one. Instead, we wanted a name that would give the combined company an identity of its own while allowing Paramount and Warner Bros. — and all our extraordinary brands — to remain in the spotlight.”

Frost Piss

By SlashbotAgent • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

Is anyone else annoyed by the 5 minutes of excessively loud studio splash screens at the start of every movie, these days.

It’s just not working out

By dynamo • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

If we ever again have even remotely sane management, it will be time for the U.S. to break up that industry into at least a dozen actual competitors. Also healthcare. And a lot of others.

Quality goes down and prices go up

By rsilvergun • • Score: 3, Insightful • Thread
Because there’s less choice every year. They don’t have to care about what you want or what you think. Because it’s so much easier to just be the only game in town and if you don’t like it well you can’t even go fuck off to the mountains because they own that land too.

I remember reading a post from a guy who moved from super liberal Oregon to the land of the free that is Texas expecting it to be a lot cooler because there would be less government regulation and he’d be able to do all the cool stuff he wanted to do like drive his ATVs and go hunting and shit. Only to find out that any of the land worth doing any of that on was already owned by other people with a lot more money than him and there was fuck all for him to do in Texas. You didn’t have to worry about following the rules when you were out in a public park because there weren’t any. At least not the kind he was used to it from Oregon.

I guess what I’m trying to get out here is you don’t realize what you lost until it’s gone. We lost antitrust law enforcement and we still haven’t realized what we lost…

WB was the original distributor

By OrangeTide • • Score: 3 • Thread

“Now all restaurants are Taco Bell”

$110 Billion? really?

By Jayhawk0123 • • Score: 3 • Thread

At what point did we start to just make up random valuations with these insanely inflated dollar amounts....

$110 Billion? really? combined these companies made $100 million in profit in 2025… yet they’re valued at 1,100% x profit?

they both lost a combined $27Billion in the ‘22-‘24 years

I made a $1K last year… but i’m valued at $1.1 Million…
It’s also the first year in 4 that i made a profit… trust me bro… I’m worth it…

Wonder what would happen to these “mergers” and hyper inflated valuations if they taxed them a sales tax? no loop holes… every effin aquisition/merger get’s taxed like any purchase you or i would do… can’t change states to lower the tax burden… etc to make it easy… no tax on businesses under $1 Million in revenue.

Used Processor Leads To Game Ban

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot
AmiMoJo shares a report from heise online:
Anyone buying used hardware for a gaming PC needs to be careful: not just whether the components are still in order but also what the previous owner did with them. A case on Reddit shows this. Someone installed a used AMD processor, a Ryzen 7 5800X3D, in their PC. Because the previous owner was caught cheating, the new owner cannot start several online games.

The problem was noticed in the first-person shooter “Valorant” from the development studio Riot. Right from the first start, the new owner was kicked out directly, according to their statement. Riot support confirmed that the previous owner had cheated. The processor is therefore on an internal blacklist — and, with its installation in the PC, now apparently also some other components like the mainboard. Riot support does not remove such entries manually.

In addition to “Valorant,” all other PC games from Riot are affected: the strategy game “League of Legends,” the auto-battler “Teamfight Tactics,” the card game “Legends of Runeterra,” the fighting game “2XKO,” and likely future titles as well.
Riot’s “Vanguard” anti-cheat system traditionally runs deep in the Windows kernel and starts with the PC, but a June 2026 update allows it to launch with a game if security features such as TPM and Secure Boot are enabled.

It’s unclear how Riot uniquely identifies processors, though possibilities include hardware fingerprinting based on chip behavior or storing identification hashes in the Trusted Platform Module (TPM), which Vanguard accesses in the newer mode.

Re:The Ban Wasn’t in the Packets

By Anonymous Coward • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

> CPUID identifies a processor model, not an individual chip

but the “Protected Processor Identification Number” does identify an actual chip. See: https://www.phoronix.com/news/…

Intel got hit with bad publicity when they tried to add serial numbers to CPUID back in the pentium 3 days… So when they stealth re-added the feature years later they changed the name. AMD dutifully copied it.

Re: The Ban Wasn’t in the Packets

By drinkypoo • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

No, most people do not have a motherboard TPM, it’s in the CPU.

Valorant

By dsgrntlxmply • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread
Valorant sounds like a Hegspeth re-specification for military deodorant: “Smells like victory.”

Re:kids these days …

By Shades72 • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

Sure, TPM and secure boot are being sold to you as security measures. And these are…secure-ish.

TPM 2.0 could already be brute-forced within 45 minutes with hardware from 10+ years ago. Now, with much faster hardware + AI…should be a whole lot less time. Because TPM 2.0 is already a very old security method and there is no TPM 2.0 or even TPM 2.0.1 being planned either. This update cadence is way worse than OpenSSL’s cadence. Or TLS’s cadence for that matter.

Secure boot is in a nutsshell a sandbox that verifies if your computer’s hardware is allowed to start up it’s operating system. Sounds great in theory, I’ll grant it that. However, it is in full control by Microsoft. So a single layer of security. By definition: “a layer of one == a layer of none”.

In theory one could say that TPM and secure boot are security measurements. In practice, each is much less effective as the narrative wants us to believe. When combined, things don’t fare that much better.

The “bonus” for Microsoft is that with those security measures, they have far more control over your computer than anyone should want. Microsoft hasn’t had a great track-record in this field. Add to that the severe lack of progress regarding TPM…then I won’t describe this as security, only as secure-ish. Because it isn’t deserving of more.

Re: kids these days …

By Kazymyr • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

Your distro can work with secure boot enabled because of a shim that grub uses to boot, and which is signed by Microsoft. Because Microsoft controls secure boot and they are the only ones who can sign it. If Microsoft stops signing that shim or revokes the signature, your distro will stop working with secure boot and there is nothing you can do about it. As long as you use secure boot you are at the mercy of Microsoft