Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. ‘AI’s Decimation of Call Center Jobs Has Begun’
  2. Massive Debian 13 Linux Kernel Security Update Patches 68 Vulnerabilities
  3. Hollywood Fights AI In Public While Quietly Building It Into Movies
  4. Rogue Police Officers Have Turned Flock’s Nationwide Camera Network Into a Stalking Tool
  5. GOG Officially Expands Linux Support With Native Galaxy Client In Development
  6. IT Teams are Spending 11 Hours a Week on Cloud Connectivity Problems
  7. New Spinning Drone Hides In Plain Sight
  8. Is There a Way to Promote Open Document Formats Instead of ‘MS Office’ Format?
  9. Steam On Linux Use Back Above 4% In July
  10. Group of Teen Hikers Relied on Google Maps. It Was a Disaster.
  11. Does Eating Less Protein Produce Healthier Aging and Metabolism?
  12. In a First, ‘Super-Earth’ Planet Shows It Could Have an Atmosphere
  13. Linux Desktop Market Share Surpasses 10% in North America
  14. Are Return-to-Office Mandates Killing Workers’ Trust in Workplaces?
  15. As New York Finalizes New Social Media Rules, US Senate Considers Nationwide ‘SCREEN’ Act

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

‘AI’s Decimation of Call Center Jobs Has Begun’

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“AI’s decimation of call center jobs has begun,” reports Bloomberg:
Companies including the Commonwealth Bank of Australia, Microsoft Corp., Uber Technologies Inc. and Hyatt Hotels Corp. are using automated chat and phone systems to handle work that previously required humans. In some cases, they’ve already wiped out sizable chunks of their customer service operations, together representing thousands of workers.

The specter of automation has long loomed over the call center industry, which employs millions worldwide from the U,S, to India to the Philippines. But until recently, generative artificial intelligence wasn’t good enough to move the needle. Now, AI advancements — and pressure on executives to show they’re embracing the new technology — have prompted corporations to deploy the tools more widely. Customer service employment in the U.S. is declining and will likely continue to do so as more tasks are automated, Forrester analyst Kate Leggett wrote in a report earlier this year. While it’s impossible to determine the future job losses, she estimated that almost half of customer service roles will be affected by 2030.

Globally, the steepest job cuts are expected to hit countries like the Philippines, where many Western companies have outsourced their most easily automated work. Salespeople at multiple tech companies told Bloomberg that they routinely pitch call center AI tools as a way of lowering labor costs, undercutting a common industry claim that AI is primarily a way to help workers become more productive rather than kill their jobs… Commonwealth Bank of Australia, the nation’s largest lender, has shed hundreds of workers from its chat support line as it wove AI into the system, according to people familiar with the work. This amounted to tens of millions of dollars in savings per year, one of the people said…

Microsoft is both one of the largest vendors and adopters of customer service automation tools. This has helped the software giant trim its customer service workforce — a mix of contractors and full-time staff — from about 50,000 to 40,000 in recent years, according to a person familiar with the operations. “If something happened with little Johnny’s Xbox in the middle of the night, we can now solve that with AI,” Judson Althoff, who runs Microsoft’s sales and service operations, said in an interview. Althoff said in April that AI is saving the company about $750 million per year in customer service costs. More complex problems still require human support, but the company is constantly expanding what can be fixed automatically, he said in the interview.
Two examples from the article:

Customer Rights

By Luthair • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
We’re going to need a law that customers have the right to talk to a person because the AI isn’t going to be reliable.

Late…

By SouthSeb • Score: 4, Informative Thread

This article is already at least 2 years late.

My town has some big call centers that used to emply thousands of people, and they have been laiding several people off since AI became a thing.

Now you’ll never get a straight answer

By bsdetector101 • Score: 4, Informative Thread
Give me a real person !

Re:Customer Rights

By drinkypoo • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

We’re going to need a law that customers have the right to talk to a person because the AI isn’t going to be reliable.

The humans are usually no help regardless. They are often not sufficiently trained to do their jobs, and they frequently have no power to do anything for the customer anyway.

This is going to backfire big time

By devslash0 • Score: 3 Thread

Agents work fine with known problems, with well-defined resolution paths. But customers often call a call centre because they have a unique, new problem specific to their circumstances that knowledge base articles and automated agents have failed to solve. We call when everything else fails and we need someone with logical thinking and outside-the-box fix.

Massive Debian 13 Linux Kernel Security Update Patches 68 Vulnerabilities

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Slashdot reader prisoninmate shares this report from 9to5Linux:
Coming ten days after the previous Linux kernel security update, which only fixed 12 vulnerabilities that may lead to a privilege escalation, denial of service, or information leaks, the new Debian 13 Linux kernel security update is a massive one, and it patches no less than 68 security vulnerabilities in the Linux 6.12 LTS kernel.

ebian 13 “Trixie” kernel security update are CVE-2026-64530, a use-after-free in the traffic-control subsystem leading to remote denial-of-service with potential for remote code execution, and CVE-2026-64531 (a.k.a. OVSwrap), a local-root vulnerability in the Open vSwitch datapath leading to local privilege escalation to root…

All Debian 13 “Trixie” users are urged to update their installations to Linux kernel 6.12.100-1 as soon as possible.

Re:Just wait a cotton pickin’ minute.

By buchner.johannes • Score: 5, Funny Thread

He came to my apartment the other day to upgrade my Linux. So he didn’t visit your machine? How did you offend him?

Why so negative?

By HnT • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

I am surprised at the many negative comments about the recently found CVEs, about Ubuntu patching LTS and the many other complaints and whining.

Finding these bugs and patching them is a massive security win for Linux and F/OSS operating systems using Linux, and it is awesome to see how many people are working together to deliver these gains to everyone - FOR FREE!
Backporting patches into LTS is pretty thankless but absolutely necessary.
How about a bit more enthusiasm and thankfulness? You are getting an entire OS for free and get to keep (most of) your privacy. When was the last time you helped backport, or donated?

Hollywood Fights AI In Public While Quietly Building It Into Movies

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Even as Hollywood performers protest and Hollywood studios sue “in their war on AI,” reports the Los Angeles Times, “the entertainment industry is deepening its dependence on it.”
Among hundreds of job postings in late June, more than one in 10 was likely connected to AI. The top studios’ public postings suggest they have been recruiting people to build AI tools. They are also recruiting teams to defend their intellectual property against unauthorized AI use. “There are plenty of studios that are hiring [for AI] but never talk about it in public,” said Yoland Yan, a co-founder of ComfyUI, a company that helps studios juggle different AI tools. Companies have been hesitant to detail how they use generative AI in film production — partly because they are concerned about consumer and union backlash. Some in Hollywood described AI use as the new cosmetic surgery, where everyone knows it is happening, but few will admit to it…

Although some companies may be shy about sharing their AI plans, big stars who don’t have to answer to others have been more open about their embrace of the new technology for storytelling. Rejecting AI is like picking a horse and buggy over a car, said “Star Wars” creator George Lucas. “Artificial intelligence means it’s much easier for us to make movies,” he told a trade magazine earlier this year. “There’s nothing you can do about it. That’s progress. It’s the future.” Some in Hollywood have a softer stance on artificial intelligence, with studios cutting deals with AI companies, and filmmakers like Martin Scorsese backing AI companies. Ben Affleck launched an AI film tech company then sold it to Netflix for half a billion dollars. When launching InterPositive, Affleck said he wanted to keep “storytelling human” by building AI tools that could fix lighting, generate missing shots and other things while “keeping creative decisions in the hands of artists....”

Disney, Netflix and Amazon had job postings that were about using AI on the creative side of the business. Universal, Paramount, Warner Bros. and Sony had job ads suggesting they were also using AI but for marketing, distribution and audience analytics. The postings suggest the Disney, Netflix and Amazon studios are building repeatable AI workflows for visual effects, animation, sound and dubbing. The companies also seem to be building in-house teams to develop custom generative-AI models, while also using third-party software.

None of the jobs advertised were to create AI that wrote scripts or created AI actors.
Ironically, the Times used Claude Code to build a scraper to identify the job postings, their article acknowledges.

Which “AI”

By darkain • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

This is an extremely broad topic. There is no one singular “AI”. These mentions of “AI”, each one, are often referring to entirely different things. For instance, CorridorKey is an “AI” based green screening technique that supports transparency and is a hell of a lot faster and more accurate than just about any other traditional tool out there. So is this the “bad” kind of “AI”? Or is this (and similar) just new tools in the tool box to speed of particularly boring and repetitive tasks nobody actually wanted to do? Masking a green screen is hardly on the “artistic” side of things, its just technical work destined for automation.

https://github.com/nikopuering…

AI… the great equalizer

By found404 • Score: 3, Insightful Thread
If Hollywood could, they would banish every tool that would enable any creator to complete with them. This is a filthy business filled with grifters that is allowed to lie about the profits they make. The IRS, the US government and Hollywood just called it “Hollywood Accounting” and laugh about it to our faces.

For me, not for thee

By TheMiddleRoad • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
For Hollywood, the good AI Is that which lowers costs for studios. No need for extras. No need for actors. No need for writers. The bad AI is anything that copies what they own, like anybody else doing what Hollywood does on their own. And it’s the workers who are getting screwed.

What did you think?

By allo • Score: 3 Thread

A technique that can save billions would go unused? The idea is like going back to special effects without computer. You may do this for some movies that then have a special extra people may appreciate, but the usual movie uses computers for that. The same way AI will become a standard tool in the box. And yes, generative AI in all forms you know it (image diffusers, LLMs, GANs for upscaling, etc.)

Rogue Police Officers Have Turned Flock’s Nationwide Camera Network Into a Stalking Tool

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
A woman found her police officer ex-boyfriend cop had used Flock’s camera system 600 times to look up the location of her and her daughter, reports the Washington Post (Alternate URL here). (She found out through Have I Been Flocked, described as “a website that aggregates police search logs made available through public records.”)

But it turns out dozens more police officers have also misused Flock…
Authorities have charged or accused at least 50 law-enforcement officers of using license-plate readers for unauthorized purposes, including to stalk women without their knowledge or consent, a Post analysis of police and court records found. In 26 of these cases, police investigators and prosecutors said the officers used the technology to spy on their wives, their girlfriends, their exes, their exes’ new partners or women they wanted to meet. In other cases, police or prosecutors have not specified the alleged surveillance targets. Flock’s system was used in 46 of the cases analyzed by The Post, while the other cases involved competing products…

After The Post relayed its findings to Flock, the company said in a statement it “will soon be announcing better filters and tools to stop abuse before it happens....” In April, the company rolled out a new voluntary “audit assistance” feature, which agencies can choose to enable, that automatically scans officers’ searches for suspicious activity, such as queries repeatedly targeting the same vehicle or run by officers off the clock. In an interview with The Post, Flock chief executive Garrett Langley said misuse of its systems is inevitable and that the company is focused on providing tools to catch perpetrators after the fact… “We’re not going to change humans, and humans make bad decisions,” Langley said. “What we can do is make sure that they know if you use this tool, you will be held accountable....”

Through automated license-plate reader systems, or ALPRs, officers could trace the rhythms and travels of their subjects’ daily lives, leading in some instances to violent confrontations, moments of psychological manipulation, and threats of coercion and control, the analysis found.

- In Wisconsin, a police officer allegedly used Flock to check whether his ex-girlfriend had gone to an abortion clinic, according to a police affidavit for a case set for trial this month.

- In Kansas, a police chief who tracked his ex through Flock sneaked up on her while she was intimate with another man, a state police certification body alleged, leading to his firing.

- In Florida, a deputy speeding to stop a young actress he’d added to a watch list for a license-plate tool called Guardian nearly caused a head-on crash, according to a police report and video from his dashboard camera. The deputy was arrested in March, and his attorney declined to comment.

- And in California, prosecutors said a former deputy, Alexander Vanny, used Flock as part of a months-long campaign of “stalking” and “humiliating” his former fiancée that also involved following her around town and installing a hidden camera in her roommate’s bathroom, according to a sentencing brief…

While some of the searches resulted in officers’ firings, prosecutions and prison sentences, police departments in other cases allowed officers to continue using the systems even after receiving warnings that they were being misused… An array of privacy advocates has argued that Flock could deter bad actors by making simple changes to its product, such as requiring officers to label every search with a criminal case number. Some policing experts also warned that agencies’ inconsistencies in developing and enforcing standard procedures for license-plate readers could lead to further misconduct. With no federal laws governing use and only a patchwork of state laws, many of the country’s roughly 18,000 police agencies are left to decide their rules on their own…

Langley, Flock’s chief, has dismissed pushes by activists for the company to further limit how officers use its product. “No one elected me the police chief of America,” he told Forbes last year, adding, “I don’t think it’s our job to police the police.”
The Post also got this quote from an officer was fired and sentenced to probation after pleading no contest to charges of computer-system misuse, stalking and battery. “Pretty much everybody uses that computer system” improperly in the department, he said, and “they don’t audit it [nearly] as much as they should.”

Flock told The Post it now has over 120,000 cameras in more than 6,000 communities, recording 20 billion license plate scans every month.

The high cost of training police

By rsilvergun • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Largely due to corruption means they’re basically untouchable. It doesn’t matter if you get caught doing something hideously illegal another subdivision of your city will hire you because they don’t want to have to spend the money training somebody else.

How shocking

By russotto • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
I’m sure nobody could have predicted this. Nobody at all.

Amazon’s Ring is far worse

By yuvcifjt • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Ring is far worse, yet receives little to no scrutiny.

Flock is bad, but not to the same degree as Ring, which is ubiquitous across the US, Canada, UK, etc.

Re:The high cost of training police

By jhoegl • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
pre 90s it was 2 years in academy. Go look it up.
Once it became shorter, because laws are no longer covered in detail, they developed this idea of qualified immunity.
Essentially police dont need to KNOW the law they are enforcing, but it has to be “best effort”, meaning the cop THINKs a law applies.
This is very different from what is required of Citizens. Odd right? Citizens need to know the law, but cops just need to guestimate the law
This includes shooting someone over parking in a McDonalds. Yes, its happened, look it up.
Qualified immunity, police union, and a shitty court system that doesnt hold cops to a HIGHER standard than citizens.
And you think that 14 week boot and 1 year training is enough…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_bOI3OwJPPw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NLu2-uqwDh8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y5JvC5E98uk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2HM3T0MQKjo

Re:The high cost of training police

By rastos1 • Score: 4, Informative Thread
Germany - 3 years
Poland - 4 years
Sweden - 2.5 years
Netherland - 2 years
Turkey - 2 years

Is your google broken?

GOG Officially Expands Linux Support With Native Galaxy Client In Development

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Long-time Slashdot reader pyroclast shared this report from Linux Journal:
After years of requests from the Linux gaming community, GOG has officially confirmed that it is developing native Linux support for the GOG Galaxy launcher. The announcement marks one of the biggest shifts in the company’s history and signals a stronger commitment to Linux as a first-class gaming platform. While GOG has offered DRM-free Linux game downloads since 2014, its Galaxy launcher has remained exclusive to Windows and macOS — until now. Although the company has not announced a release date, GOG says Linux has become a major area of investment, with development already underway…

Unlike the web-based game downloads that Linux users already have access to, GOG Galaxy serves as a full-featured game management application. The launcher currently offers features including:

— Automatic game installation and updates
— Cloud save synchronization
— Achievement tracking
— Playtime statistics
— Game library organization
— Integrated storefront browsing
— Friends lists and social features
— Cross-platform launcher integration

Today, Linux users typically access these capabilities through community projects such as Heroic Games Launcher, Lutris, or Bottles. A native Galaxy client would provide an officially supported alternative with direct integration into GOG’s ecosystem…

For GOG, supporting Linux more fully aligns with its philosophy of giving users greater control over their purchased games.
The article argues this news shows Linux growing in importance for game publishers. After the rapid adoption of Valve’s Steam Deck, there’s also been continuous improvements to Proton and Vulkan, increasing hardware compatibility, and native Linux game development efforts.

“As more companies recognize the platform’s growth, Linux users can expect broader support from game publishers and software developers alike.”

That’s cool

By OrangeTide • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

I’m glad they’re supporting Linux even more now. There aren’t a lot of us but maybe with Microsoft constantly making their OS worse, some more converts will show up.

The thing is, I don’t really use GOG Galaxy because the big value add for me is that I can download and install games to run off line. And admittedly this is what GOG Galaxy does in the background (and it will even backup the installer and fetch bonus content if you want it to). But I don’t necessarily need galaxy to run my games, as the installer already does a nice job putting it under my desktop’s menu and I can browse or search for games.

Where Steam’s app is ahead is that it has better integration with friends lists and makes it easier to invite your friends into a game. It’s not that huge of a deal because Discord can already do some of that on Linux today if you grant it permissions necessary for it to track what game you’re playing.

IT Teams are Spending 11 Hours a Week on Cloud Connectivity Problems

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Researchers found enterprises are spending time troubleshooting cloud connectivity due to increased AI workloads, reports Computer Weekly. More than 400 IT and infrastructure decision-makers (US and UK) were surveyed for internet/cloud/AI exchange operator DE-CIX by market researchers Censuswide. But despite 96% of respondents claiming their enterprise networks are ready for cloud/AI loads, the average IT team still spends more than 11 hours each week resolving cloud connectivity problems
Other leading concerns included downtime or reliability issues (26%), latency or slow performance (28%), and security vulnerabilities/DDoS attacks (27%). Cost of connectivity, staff expertise and lack of visibility/control over data flows were also cited as major challenges… As a result, as indicated in the study, many businesses are now turning to private interconnection, which enables enterprises to connect directly to cloud providers over dedicated infrastructure rather than routing traffic across the public Internet. Designed to deliver lower latency, greater resilience, enhanced security and more predictable performance, private interconnection has become an increasingly important way of supporting modern cloud and AI workloads. Specifically, the data showed that 61% of companies are already using private connectivity to clouds, while another 31% are actively considering it… [And 71% of enterprises with 1000 or more employees]

Only 8.62% of the smaller companies were spending 21 to 40 hours per week dealing with connectivity issues, while just 2.53% of the largest companies in the sample do. Summing up these findings, DE-CIX said that together they suggest direct interconnection is rapidly becoming a core component of enterprise cloud and AI infrastructure and a competitive advantage for companies, though optimising interconnection strategies clearly remains a pressing challenge for small and medium-sized enterprises… “Every AI application depends on data moving quickly, securely and predictably between users, clouds and AI infrastructure. Our research suggests that far too many enterprises are still spending valuable time trying to maintain that kind of connectivity, with more than a third spending between 11 and 20 hours per week, and just under one in 10 spending between 21 to 40 hours per week. This confirms what we already knew — that that network architecture can make or break AI adoption.”
Elsewhere The Register reports that cloud infrastructure services “grew at their fastest for eight years during the second quarter of 2026, thanks to the AI craze and continued demand for flexible and scalable IT infrastructure.”
According to the latest figures from Synergy Research, enterprise spending on cloud infrastructure passed $143 billion in Q2, a year-on-year growth rate of 43 percent. This followed 11 successive quarters of increasing growth rates, during which the market has now doubled in size… “AI has, of course, driven most of that incremental growth, and we now see year-on-year growth rates of 165 percent for AI-specific cloud services....” And the top three global players continue to dominate the market, with Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft Azure and Google Cloud together accounting for 67 percent of all the cloud revenue during the quarter. That percentage has increased since the third quarter of last year, when the triumvirate made up 63 percent of enterprise cloud infra spending.

Parsing

By Kunedog • Score: 3 Thread
What was the headline supposed be? At first I thought they left out a hyphen, so there were 11-hour outages:

IT Teams Report 11 Hour a Week on-Cloud Connectivity Problems

But no, the teams are talking about hosting clouds themselves, so they really just got the plural wrong:

IT Teams Report Spending 11 Hours a Week on Cloud Connectivity Problems

I think by convention (if not by definition) I should expect to understand the headline without reading further.

I think a word was out of the title.

By TigerPlish • Score: 4 Thread

It’s hard to parse sentences some of the words are.

Do not the cat.

Re: and when the one vendor has an outage some tim

By AvitarX • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Because if your service goes down for 2 hours at the same time as everyone else’s and it’s a news story that it’s someone else’s fault it doesn’t look as bad as if it goes down for 1 hour when it’s your fault.

New Spinning Drone Hides In Plain Sight

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
To design invisible drones, researchers have tried camouflage, transparent materials and light-bending optical systems. But engineers at Northwestern University used “motion blur,” which an announcement from the school notes is the effect that makes fast-spinning fans seem to disappear.

“The drone spins up to 25 times per second, which is too fast for the human eye to see clearly. While it isn’t completely invisible, it morphs into a ghostly smudge that seamlessly blends into the background… "
To design the drone, the Northwestern team first used a computational model to generate roughly 20,000 drone configurations capable of stable flight. Then, they used artificial intelligence (AI) and optimization algorithms to repeatedly rearrange the drones’ major components, including a motor, propeller, circuit board, counterweight and batteries. After sifting through many different configurations, the algorithms determined the ideal placement of the drone’s components to minimize its visibility from virtually every viewing angle while allowing for stable flight.

After selecting promising candidates, the engineers simulated each drone spinning in flight and overlaid those images a hundred real-world backgrounds. Then, they used a perception model that approximates human vision to determine how noticeable each design appeared. Designs that blended into their surroundings received lower visibility scores. The team selected the 500 lowest-scoring designs and applied the optimization algorithm, which repeatedly adjusted the positions of components to further minimize those scores. “The design process was fully automated,” [said Northwestern’s associate CS professor Michael Rubenstein, who led the work]. “Then, when we were confident that a drone met all our criteria, we built it.”
They’ve named the drone “Phantom Twist”,” and plan to design future iterations with more transparent materials or quieter propulsion to make it even less noticeable.

The Northwestern team presented the work on July 16 at Robotics: Science and Systems 2026 in Sydney, Australia…

Thanks to long-time Slashdot reader fahrbot-bot for sharing the news.

25 x per sec

By rossdee • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

how does it see out?

And the world keeps getting scarier

By sarren1901 • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

n/a

Re: 25 x per sec

By liqu1d • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
Silly idea but if it’s rotating at that speed the wouldn’t it be possible to capture images at 25fps? I assume the rotation would be fairly consistent so timing the image capture should be possible.

Re:25 x per sec

By SeaFox • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

If it’s spinning at that rate couldn’t you have the camera synchronized to the spins so it’s capturing a frame when it’s turned to the same position? Kinda like the mechanism that allowed fighter planes to have machine guns mounted in front of the pilot and shooting between the propeller blades. Motion picture cameras are 24 fps.

Make a silent drone I’ll be more impressed

By LindleyF • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Those things are loud.

Is There a Way to Promote Open Document Formats Instead of ‘MS Office’ Format?

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
The Register looks at exactly why “It is practically impossible to move any non-trivial Word document out of MS Office to a non-MS suite and back again without it being more trouble than it’s worth.”
OOXML, developed by Microsoft and first standardized by Ecma in 2006, became the ISO/IEC 29500 standard in 2008 after a grueling and adversarial process. Microsoft pursued standardization because it has always been a standards-led organization dedicated to maximizing the options for its customers. Or because it had to at gunpoint, while vowing silently to follow the letter of the law but stymie its intent. You decide… The Document Foundation (TDF) which spends its days worrying about such things, reports that Microsoft has effectively broken the standard by sticking with a transitional version as its default rather than the cleaner Strict variant. The result is that what Microsoft software renders is what Microsoft wants to render, despite nominal compliance…

What we need is a test suite that can take any OOXML engine and test its compliance against what Microsoft is actually doing. That means the tooling wrapped around the spec has to account for proprietary dependencies that get smuggled in, such as fonts. It also means actively and continuously tracking the ground truth of Microsoft’s evolving products and services. It doesn’t need to be perfect, but it absolutely needs to be good enough. Compliant engines have to become good enough for a critical mass of users to coalesce around them.
In an earlier article The Document Foundation reminded all software users that they have a choice. “When an institution sends a letter formatted with a proprietary font, embedded in a proprietary format, produced by proprietary software, it is not communicating information but perpetuating a dependency.”

“Digital sovereignty begins with the recognition that this is a choice: the file format is a choice, the font on the page is a choice, and the software is a choice.”

Re:PDF

By hadleyburg • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

This problem has been solved. PDF

Although PDF is not well suited for collaboration, when you are sending the document with the expectation that they will modify it and send it back…

Collaboration?

By madsh • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
How about collaborate on text and not desktop publishing? Markdown will work better for many many word documents. And if you are more picky about layout, you either let the computer do it or hire someone else.

Pragmatism

By hadleyburg • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

I think you have to be a bit pragmatic about this sort of thing, and choose your battles.

Proprietary formats involve all sorts of risks, but when they are commonly used, it can be difficult to push a large group of people to change.

I’d suggest focussing on the document category. For documents which need to last a long time, you could propose a format that people are likely to be able to use in 10 or 20 years. I think that sort of reasoning will make sense to others.

But if you just send back a MS Word document because you are frustrated that it is not in a well thought out standard format, you are at risk of becoming an IT curmudgeon. The sender of the document, who might not know the ins and outs of file formats, but has been supplied a PC installed with MS Office, might, not unreasonably, consider your response to be unprofessional.

Use ODT and ODS

By Wolfling1 • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
We dumped Office a few years ago, and have been using LibreOffice since. When we send documents out to our clients, we send them as ODTs and ODSes. All our internals are ODTs and ODSes too.

In over 5 years, it has never been a problem. Office reads these files, and will happily save back to them.

Better yet, removing Office from our ecosystem has dramatically reduced costs both in Infrastructure and in ongoing maintenance.

If only we could remove Microsoft’s aborted HTML variant monstrosity from emails sent by Outlook, my life would be fulfilled.

Re: Just send it back

By ClickOnThis • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Microsoft has a whole business model built on proprietary standards. They encourage sharing documents in their own proprietary formats instead of open-standard ones, in order to lock people in. When someone sends you a Microsoft document, they don’t care that you have to buy MS Office to read it properly. They are co-opted into the culture MS is trying to create, and they think you belong in it also. And if you don’t want to be in it, you’re a loser.

So tell me: who doesn’t give a shit about whom?

Steam On Linux Use Back Above 4% In July

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Valve just published the Steam Survey results for July 2026, reports Phoronix, “and they point to a small uptick in Linux gaming use.”
Back in March Steam on Linux hit a record high of 5.33%, dropped to 4.52% in April, landed at 3.99% in May, and then in June was at 3.69%. The just-published numbers for July put Steam on Linux use at 4.01%, as an improvement over the prior two months but still well off the percentage highs of March and April…

The July data puts SteamOS Holo as powering around 22% of Steam on Linux gaming systems. That’s also with the Steam Machine now shipping, in addition to the Steam Deck.

Group of Teen Hikers Relied on Google Maps. It Was a Disaster.

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“When a group of teenagers set out to hike British Columbia’s famed Howe Sound Crest Trail in early July, Google Maps suggested the trek would take about five hours,” reports SFGate.

“Instead, the hike stretched deep into the night, leaving the group exhausted, dehydrated, injured and in need of a helicopter rescue…”
Although the approximately 18-mile route with a 6,000-foot elevation gain can be completed by experienced trail runners in a day, search and rescue officials generally recommend hikers treat it as a two-day backpacking trip. The teenagers, all 17 years old, believed Google Maps’ estimate that the route would take about five hours. The printed directions they were carrying, which were shared publicly by Lions Bay Search and Rescue, gave simple instructions for two legs of the trail, but didn’t account for the terrain or elevation. "[Google Maps] is calculating the time that you’re walking a straight road on pavement,” [said Maria Masiar, training officer and search manager with Lions Bay Search and Rescue]. “When you get into outdoor terrain, that no longer holds true.”

Expecting only a short outing, each hiker carried about half a liter of water and limited food. There are no reliable water sources along the trail, meaning hikers must carry enough supplies for the entire route. As the group climbed, they began suffering from dehydration and muscle cramps but continued onward despite falling dramatically behind schedule. Eventually, the group made the decision to turn back and abandon making it to the end of the trail — and as the sun began to set and the group started to descend, fatigue took its toll. According to Masiar, members of the group had already stumbled and fallen several times while trying to race the coming dark, and only one hiker had a headlamp. Eventually, another hiker slipped about 10 feet off a boulder, injuring his tailbone badly enough that he could no longer continue. Search and rescue crews responded, ultimately evacuating him by helicopter.

I’m surprised it had any trails at all

By itsme1234 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I mean Google Maps it’s a sh*show for literally going 15 minutes from the car in the “woods” in Western Europe (quotes there because it’s more like someone’s backyard in other places less populated, and I don’t mean a king or anything). OpenStreetMaps are way better but it has to be a somehow popular region/destination.

Dumb

By ceoyoyo • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

People do dumb stuff in the mountains all the time. A couple of people apparently tried to hike this trail last winter in shorts.

This is a BC provincial park so there is undoubtedly a great big sign at the trailhead telling you how long to expect it to take and advising minimal equipment you should make sure to bring. There’s also an official website (advising only experienced hikers go beyond a certain point) and many, many other websites.

Using technology is hard

By quonset • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I’m going to victim blame. This is what happens when you blindly accept what a computer tells you. Based solely on this story, none of them did the least bit of research into what this trail entailed OTHER than what Google Maps said. Again, based solely on this story, none checked with any of the ranger stations or even the web site of the trail itself to see if it had any information on this trail.

If you’ve never hiked a trail, or even driven somewhere, in this day and age there is absolutely no excuse for not doing your research (the good kind, not the vaccination kind) prior to leaving. We literally have the information at our fingertips to find out what something is like prior to going there. How about we use it.

Rescuer perspective

By Arrogant-Bastard • Score: 5, Informative Thread
I’ve done a lot of incident response, and was a certified trainer for over a decade. One of the things I’ve observed is that the higher the reliance on technology among the party, the higher the probability that they’ll require rescue. People who can read a topo map, can use a compass, who understand the importance of carrying more water than they think they’ll ever need, and who have a (tested, working) flashlight rarely get into trouble. People who rely on Google/Apple/whatever maps, who are glued to their cell phones, who can’t read a map or use a compass, set themselves up for issues. Of course, thankfully, most of the time those issues don’t arise or are minor. But when they’re not…

In this particular instance: 6000 feet of elevation gain is rather a lot. I’ve done 5000 up/down in a single day, but that’s a LONG day even for someone who’s fairly fit and accustomed to the exertion. Anyone who’s not in shape is going to really struggle not just with the exertion but with the altitude, and we see in this instance, as they fatigue they may stumble and/or fall. It’s just not a good idea, even for (let’s say) young people who are physically active, go to the gym, play a sport or two — because it’s a very different kind of physical activity and because you can’t just stop when you’ve had enough.

Aside: experienced trail runners make all of us look silly. I remember slogging my way up a trail at 11,000 feet when I heard the quick tap-tap-tap of one behind me. He went by with a quick “Morning!” and just kept going. I was still slogging my way up at about 12,000 feet when I saw him coming toward me, on his way back down — same tap-tap-tap at the same pace, just out for a casual morning trot while we ordinary mortals were trudging along. I’m willing to bet that he did that trail often enough to know every rock, to have every step mapped out in his brain, to just dance his way up and down.

Pedestrians get sent round traffic circles

By joeblog • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Using Google maps as a pedestrian is really dangerous. It tells you to walk around traffic circles as if you’re a car that has to do 270 degrees.

Also, it keeps pointing the map north even if you’re walking south.

Does Eating Less Protein Produce Healthier Aging and Metabolism?

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“A major scientific review is challenging the idea that more protein is always better,” reports ABC News:
The review, led by pathologist and biomedical researcher Dudley Lamming and published in the journal Cell Press Blue, examined more than 350 studies involving humans, mice, insects, yeast, and other organisms. The review found that eating less protein, or less of certain amino acids that make up protein, may turn on body processes linked to healthier aging, as well as metabolism, the process by which the body turns food and drinks into energy…

For adults who already get enough, eating more protein may offer little benefit, while some research suggests that eating less protein could support healthier aging… Lamming reviewed the effect of reducing protein in many body processes. One of the processes involves a hormone called FGF21. “There’s an increase in a hormone called FGF21 that promotes energy expenditure [when protein intake is reduced],” Lamming said. “It essentially increases thermogenesis in your adipose tissue, so you don’t just store fat, but actually burn it as fuel.” This may help explain why some studies connect lower-protein diets with less body fat, better blood sugar control and a healthier metabolism. Eating less protein may also affect signals that tell cells when to grow, repair damage or recycle old cell parts. These jobs may play a role in aging.

However, protein restriction is not the same as protein deficiency. The goal is not to deprive the body of an essential nutrient. Instead, the research raises the possibility that avoiding unnecessary excess could benefit some people who already consume enough… Before reaching for another high-protein product, a better question may be: How much protein does my body actually need?

Re:Protein

By mistergrumpy • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

1. Eat food, not too much, mostly plants

2 Everything in moderation, including moderation

Re:Protein

By walterbyrd • Score: 4, Informative Thread

WTF? The protein “fad” has been going on since, at least, 1980. Nothing to do with MAGA.

Proteinaholic: How Our Obsession with Meat is…

By Paul Fernhout • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Killing Us and What We Can Do About It by Garth Davis M.D., Howard Jacobson: https://www.amazon.com/Protein…
====
An acclaimed surgeon specializing in weight loss delivers a paradigm-shifting examination of the diet and health industry’s focus on protein, explaining why it is detrimental to our health, and can prevent us from losing weight.

Whether you are seeing a doctor, nutritionist, or a trainer, all of them advise to eat more protein. Foods, drinks, and supplements are loaded with extra protein. Many people use protein for weight control, to gain or lose pounds, while others believe it gives them more energy and is essential for a longer, healthier life. Now, Dr. Garth Davis, an expert in weight loss asks, “Is all this protein making us healthier?”

The answer, he emphatically argues, is NO. Too much protein is actually making us sick, fat, and tired, according to Dr. Davis. If you are getting adequate calories in your diet, there is no such thing as protein deficiency. The healthiest countries in the world eat far less protein than we do and yet we have an entire nation on a protein binge getting sicker by the day.

As a surgeon treating obese patients, Dr. Davis was frustrated by the ever-increasing number of sick and overweight patients, but it wasn’t until his own health scare that he realized he could do something about it. Combining cutting-edge research, with his hands-on patient experience and his years dedicated to analyzing studies of the world’s longest-lived populations, this explosive, groundbreaking book reveals the truth about the dangers of protein and shares a proven approach to weight loss, health, and longevity.
====

Also: “How Do You Prevent Protein Deficiency? Dr. Joel Fuhrman”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?…
        “In this informative discussion, Dr. Joel Fuhrman breaks down the importance of protein adequacy and optimal macronutrient ratios for longevity on a plant-based diet. Learn about the surprising fat content of meat, the risks associated with low-carb diets like keto and carnivore, and the science-backed approach of the Nutritarian diet. Discover the crucial role of nuts and seeds in promoting longevity, as demonstrated in the Adventist Health Study, and gain practical tips for fueling athletic performance with whole plant foods.”

Meat has been marketed based on scaring people about protein.
Dairy has been marketed based on scaring people about calcium.
You can generally get enough of each if you eat a varied whole-foods plat-based diet especially one including beans and nuts and seeds etc.. Calcium is actually the harder one than protein (since if you get enough calories from whole foods you generally get enough protein):
https://www.worldofvegan.com/v…

Re:Food-“Sciences” habe been pathetic

By SoftwareArtist • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

You’re confusing mainstream nutrition advice with fad diets. The Mediterranean diet was proposed in 1975, and by the 1980s it was already widely embraced by mainstream nutritionists as the recommended way to eat. In the 40 years since then, that has never changed. The evidence for it has only gotten stronger with time.

Meanwhile, countless fad diets have come along, each based on some fringe theory and unsupported by solid evidence. And every time that happens, the mainstream nutritionists say, “Please ignore them. Eat a Mediterranean diet.” And people like you say, “What’s wrong with these scientists? Why do they keep recommending new diets that are different from the old ones?”

Re:Proteinaholic: How Our Obsession with Meat is..

By phantomfive • Score: 4, Informative Thread

If you are getting adequate calories in your diet, there is no such thing as protein deficiency.

This part is absolutely false. Several proteins are essential amino acids, which means your body cannot synthesize them itself. They MUST be eaten. It doesn’t matter how many calories are in your diet, if you do not eat those amino acids, you will have a protein deficiency.

Maybe this doctor is being misquoted, but you do need protein in your diet.

In a First, ‘Super-Earth’ Planet Shows It Could Have an Atmosphere

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“Scientists say they have detected promising signs that a planet orbiting a star 49 light-years from Earth could have an atmosphere,” reports CNN, “making it potentially suitable for life.”
Called LHS 1140b, the object is about five times the mass of our planet, or a “super-Earth.” This planet orbits around its star in the "Goldilocks zone,” also known as the habitable zone, meaning its surface temperature is not too hot or too cold for liquid water to exist… “It appears to be consistent with Earth, meaning it might have an iron core and a silicate mantle, plus some sort of low-density component, which is probably a combination of water and, now we know, an atmosphere,” [said Collin Cherubim, a planetary scientist and lead author of a paper on the finding, published July 16 in the journal Science]… If further observations confirm the findings, LHS 1140b would mark the first discovery of an atmosphere on a rocky planet in the habitable zone of another star…

There is no evidence of life or a life-supporting atmosphere on LHS 1140b now, but Cherubim said he believes it’s a formidable candidate for potential signatures of extraterrestrial life. “I think it’s the best place to look for life outside the solar system at this point,” he said. “It’s mostly rocky, it’s at the right temperature to support liquid water on the surface, and it has an atmosphere — those are the three key ingredients we look for…” Confirming the existence of an atmosphere on a rocky planet orbiting a red dwarf would be particularly exciting, Cherubim said, because the possibility of that happening is an open question in astronomy. “Can rocky planets have atmospheres around red dwarfs? This is the first bona fide yes,” he said. “It’s kind of a sigh of relief for a lot of us. But the jury’s still out. Maybe this is a weird planet, and it’s an oddball, or maybe it’s the first of many. We don’t know yet.”
Now “The James Webb Space Telescope is going to look at it,” Cherubim told CNN, and “Hubble’s going to look at it. Basically, everybody who can see it is going to be training their eyes on it.”

Michaël Gillon, research director of the Astrobiology Research Unit at Belgium’s University of Liège warned CNN that no definitive proof exists that LHS 1140b possesses a substantial atmosphere. But if the detection of helium can be confirmed, the implications would be profound. “Until now, we had only limited evidence for atmospheres on temperate rocky exoplanets. Demonstrating that LHS 1140 b has retained a substantial atmosphere over billions of years would show that at least some habitable zone Super-Earths around red dwarfs can survive the intense early activity of their host stars.”

49 light years… so close!

By guygo • Score: 3 Thread

It would only take 77,000 years to get there at the fastest speed accomplished by a human-made object. Hey Elon… Excelsior!

Re:The uses of Helium

By ClickOnThis • Score: 4, Informative Thread

What would be REALLY exciting - over and above finding intelligent extraterrestrial non-human life - is discovering that they could metabolize helium.

Why not? The aliens in Project Hail Mary could build solid objects out of xenon, so why not helium?

I can say confidently that nothing has or is going to metabolize helium anytime soon. Helium is the noblest of all the noble gases. It can’t form compounds with anything, except under extreme conditions such as 300,000 times Earth’s atmospheric pressure.

Xenon, on the other hand is a noble gas that can form compounds, typically involving fluorine or oxygen. Some of them are used industrially.

Linux Desktop Market Share Surpasses 10% in North America

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
The blog Linuxiac reports:
Linux has crossed a major milestone in North America, with the open-source operating system now accounting for 10.65% of desktop usage in the region, according to Statcounter’s latest figures for July 2026. The result places Linux firmly in double-digit territory for the first time in Statcounter’s North American desktop operating system statistics.

For comparison, Statcounter recorded Linux at 5.52% in June 2026, so the share nearly doubled in one month… However, the sharp monthly increase needs context. Statcounter’s June figures included an “Unknown” category that accounted for 9.24% of North American desktop usage. Its reduction seems to have coincided with Linux’s rise, possibly indicating better identification of previously unclassified traffic…

Statcounter is not the only major web measurement platform showing Linux with a substantial presence on North American desktops. Cloudflare Radar data, filtered to desktop HTTP traffic from North America over the previous 28 days, also places Linux at a notably high level [9.4%].
StatCounter’s data also shows Linux with an even larger market share of 11.87% in just the United States — and a 14.73% market share in India. Linux’s market share in other world regions:
Asia 7.17%
Africa 5.71%
Europe 5.49%
South America 4.35%
China 2.12%

And here’s how the Linux market share in other countries compare to India and the U.S.
India 14.73%
United States 11.87%
Germany 7.24%
UK 6.18%
Canada 3.83%
Australia 3.55%

Linux’s surge could be due to its use in automation or headless browser workloads, Linuxiac points out. But another possibility is “growing frustration with Windows hardware requirements, advertising, account integration, telemetry, and forced interface changes has pushed some users to explore alternatives…”

“For now, the safest conclusion is that Linux has surpassed 10% of measured desktop web usage in North America according to Statcounter, not necessarily 10% of the region’s installed desktop computer base.”

Re:Netcraft Confirms

By drinkypoo • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Or, maybe better terminology, the year Microsoft finally fscked themselves with no backwards compatibility with even (well maintained) 10 year old laptops being good enough for 99% of the web.

Microsoft needs OEMs to buy licenses, even at a deeply discounted rate this is important (and importantly, has been dependable) revenue. They only do that when they are selling PCs. Microsoft had to help those OEMs sell PCs to capture that revenue.

Microsoft knows that source is drying up. Companies will be able to move away from Windows. This is why they have been shifting their focus towards the cloud. Like IBM, they have become a services company as they became staid and unable to execute on delivering exciting products, or in fact products people want. Instead, the best they can do is products they’re forced to use. The money is all the same color no matter what the feelings behind it are…

Re:Fed up with Windows needing something every sta

By toutankh • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Windows has gotten tiresome and hostile

If by “has gotten” you imply “in the past thirty years”. In that whole time it has been about controlling rather than empowering the customers. Things like overwriting the MBR without asking, the existence of the registry, changing the control panel, generally ruining things that work and that people are used to, fostering monopoly of other Microsoft products, *checks notes* upgrading Windows to the next version without asking for consent. Maybe these things didn’t affect you, but they are all real and not new.

Windows 11 is very different

By rsilvergun • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Microsoft has had dog shit software in the past. But it wasn’t necessarily because of evil it was incompetence. There is some problems with Microsoft Office where the format is intentionally overly complex to make it difficult to reverse engineer and other bits of nastiness like that. But for the most part when an entire operating system from Microsoft sucks like Vista or 8 it’s because Microsoft screwed the pooch by accident.

Typically Microsoft intentionally bloats their operating systems so that oems have something to sell new computers for. That’s a long standing and not terribly secret thing and it’s why every new iteration of windows gobbles is much RAM and GPU and CPU as they can. But that wasn’t really a factor with Windows 11 or even Windows 10 because we had just gotten to the point where computers were fast enough.

With Windows 11 it’s the spyware. It’s grinding the computer to a halt so they can monitor what you’re doing to train their AI bullshit to replace you at your job. It’s also a fuck ton of nasty DRM and other associated nastiness so that corporations can spy on you and control your computer. This makes your computer increasingly unusable. That’s a relatively new thing.

Re:Fed up with Windows needing something every sta

By tero • Score: 5, Funny Thread

but Windows has gotten tiresome and hostile.

Just wait until you meet and get to interact the FOSS crowd!

Re:Netcraft Confirms

By jenningsthecat • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The need for local software is almost gone.

The perceived need for local software is almost gone. When an internet connection is unavailable or undesirable for some reason, you may be sorry you gave up the autonomy which local software provides…

Are Return-to-Office Mandates Killing Workers’ Trust in Workplaces?

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
The Hill published the thoughts of Gleb Tsipursky, Ph.D., who serves as the CEO of the future-of-work consultancy Disaster Avoidance Experts:
A recent EnhancV survey of 1,000 full-time U.S. workers subject to new or stricter return-to-office policies found that 72% suspect these mandates are really a voluntary attrition strategy — a strategy by their own employers to make them quit their jobs. A full 46% admit to the practice of coffee-badging. Thirty-six percent have applied for a new job while sitting at their current office desk. Thirty-six percent have started a side hustle since the mandate was announced, in anticipation of being let go or quitting. Those numbers do not prove that employees reject collaboration. They show that many employees no longer trust the official story…

The central mistake in many in-office mandates is the assumption that proximity automatically produces commitment. It does not. A worker who spends two hours commuting to sit on video calls with colleagues in other cities is not experiencing culture. That worker is experiencing theater. When executives describe the office as a cure-all, many employees experience lost time, higher costs and lower autonomy. The policy’s defining feature becomes its credibility gap. Research keeps undercutting the belief that more office time automatically means better performance. A University of Pittsburgh analysis of S&P 500 firms found that return-to-office mandates reduced employee satisfaction without improving firm performance or firm value....

Baylor University’s reporting on office mandates and brain drain found that firms with mandates faced greater turnover among women, senior employees, managers and high-skilled workers, while job vacancy duration increased and hiring rates declined. In other words, the people with the most options are often the first to leave. The employees who remain may not be the most committed — they may simply be the least mobile… Attendance can be mandated, but commitment cannot. When leaders confuse the two, they do not rebuild workplace culture. They create a room full of people planning their exit.

Re:Pretty simple

By jhoegl • Score: 4, Informative Thread
Im going to let you know that it was already allowed for introverts with high production to work from home. Before COVID WFH was allowed for quite a few people, including executives.
Those that do not earn an income off of physical labor, as you pointed out, waste personal time on daily travel that adds nothing of significance to the job. Is work being completed? Is there a concern with performance? Then address them, dont be scared to talk with the employee.
But they are scared, otherwise they wouldnt lie, they wouldnt worry about talking with the employee, and they wouldnt try some convoluted excuse.
There is nothing new here, except that the general public realized that the unnecessary bits were imposed upon them by Executives who are in charge of buildings they have a stake in or own, and freaked out when companies were re-evaluating the need for the physical presence.
The really good analysis was that WFH doesnt take away from the business. That was stated multiple times, and still is a valid point.

Re:Wow

By pla • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
It’s much simpler than all that - Remote work proves management are exactly as useless and attention-seeking as we always suspected they were.

Leaders equating line-of-sight supervision with effectiveness found themselves without their primary management tool

having well-trained, well-motivated managers leads to massive boosts in productivity from hybrid and remote working models. The data support this argument from the flip side, too. Among companies that reported struggles with remote work, this issue was concentrated in firms in which leaders fumbled the management and coordination of their remote teams.

Remote and hybrid workers are struggling with leadership gaps that were never addressed when companies shifted out of the office. Many management habits remain rooted in on-site visibility rather than clear expectations and outcomes.

And most damning of all, The study concludes that narcissistic leaders oppose virtual work primarily because it threatens their access to power and status, rather than out of concern for organizational productivity. Shandell, Elliott, and Grant write that “leader narcissism is a critical but neglected source of resistance to remote work.”

Who cares?

By rsilvergun • Score: 4, Informative Thread
Or rather who that matters actually cares?

Return to office was about commercial real estate property values so that a couple of billionaires who are heavily invested in it didn’t lose their investments. Every single credible study has shown that work from home improves productivity and is universally beneficial because it gets people off the roads so if you are somebody who genuinely has to go into the office you have less traffic and cleaner air.

Nobody is going to care whether employees are happy or not anymore. Not broadly. Automation has been devouring jobs since the late 70s and by all accounts the pace is going to accelerate. So employers don’t need to be nice to you anymore.

The Hatred of an Office - A History Lesson.

By geekmux • Score: 5, Informative Thread

This utter hatred of going to an office has its roots in Covid.

The Remote Desktop Protocol and 128+ bits of entropy protecting a VPN tunnel, has existed for 20+ years now.

The same Remote Desktop Protocol that enables grown-ass professionals to not waste upwards of a fucking fiscal quarter** every calendar year sitting behind a steering wheel commuting to a job that could be done remotely.

The utter hatred of going into an office, has existed for a LOT longer than COVID-era investors refusing to degrade the 10x premium on dirt invested into your 401k and pension funds as “business” grade dirt, and a LOT longer than No Moron Hired Behind DEI laws and practices that also destroy remote work policies because they cannot be trusted to actually work remotely.

Re:Pretty simple

By flink • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Every employer I’ve had in my 30yr professional career did not care if its programmers came into the office. This included fortune 500 multinationals, mid size regional companies, and small LLCs. WFH has only become an issue since it became a political rallying cry in the culture war.

As New York Finalizes New Social Media Rules, US Senate Considers Nationwide ‘SCREEN’ Act

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot
New York has finalized new rules that will govern social media apps in the state starting on January 25, 2027. The law prohibits social media platforms from sending notifications to minors between midnight and 6 a.m. without parental consent. And minors “will only be shown content from other accounts they follow or otherwise select in a set sequence, such as chronological order,” rather than “the default algorithmically personalized feeds… unless they get parental consent for an addictive feed.” (Social media companies “must offer at least one alternative method for age assurance besides providing a government-issued ID,” the announcements points out, and any information used to determine age “must not be used for any other purpose and must be deleted or de-identified immediately after its intended use.”)

But meanwhile, the EFF writes that a committee in the U.S. Senate is considering the SCREEN ACT, “a sweeping age-verification bill that would require online services to verify users’ ages before they can access any sexually explicit content. If this bill passes, it will force millions of adult internet users to give up their anonymity, privacy, and security before they access lawful speech.”
Unlike many state-age verification laws — which have been harmful in their own right — the SCREEN Act has no requirement that a significant portion of the website consist of sexually explicit content that is harmful to minors. The bill requires nearly any service hosting even a single piece of sexually explicit content to verify the ages of its users. The result is that the bill would apply not only to adult content sites like PornHub or OnlyFans, but also streaming services like Netflix, and social media platforms like Reddit, Discord, or Bluesky, if they host any adult content…

Under the SCREEN Act, the “bouncer” will be a digital age-verification service that captures your personal information and saves it to a database for an unspecified amount of time. The consequences of the bill won’t be limited to minors. If websites and apps are expected to reliably identify teenagers, adults will be asked to prove they are adults. Even worse, the SCREEN Act is a privacy and data security nightmare. One provision of the bill requires services to take reasonable steps to protect the data collected and to not maintain for longer than is necessary. But these are terribly weak protections that impose no meaningful collection, use, or retention limits on services collecting people’s private information…

The SCREEN Act also targets virtual private network (VPN) users and providers. The bill requires covered websites to verify users’ ages based on their IP addresses unless the service can determine that the user is outside the United States, and specifically requires age verification on traffic coming from known VPN addresses. In practice, this discourages the use of VPNs and proxy servers, which millions of people rely on for legitimate purposes such as protecting personal privacy, securing public Wi-Fi connections, safeguarding journalists and activists, and preventing data tracking…

The SCREEN Act creates onerous age-verification rules that will block adults from accessing lawful speech, curtail their ability to be anonymous, and jeopardize the data security and privacy of all internet users.

You’re assuming that’s not the point.

By dgatwood • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

At this point, I’ve stopped giving politicians the benefit of the doubt. If they support regulations that look like they have the potential to drag the United States into becoming an authoritarian hellhole, I assume that they’re actually trying to do just that. It makes it a lot easier to convince myself to vote for another candidate in every election afterwards, even if that candidate isn’t as good in other areas, because at least the other candidate isn’t trying to destroy our basic freedoms.

Look up the sponsors of the bill, and vote against them from now on, whether it’s a primary or a general election. Repeat until ousted.

Pretentious backronym

By fahrbot-bot • Score: 5, Funny Thread

From the actual House/Senate bills:

This Act may be cited as the “Shielding Children’s Retinas from Egregious Exposure on the Net Act” or the “SCREEN Act”.

[rolls eyes, *sigh*]

Re:This already exists

By jsonn • Score: 5, Funny Thread
I think the IRS certainly qualifies as BDSM…

Re:Zero Knowledge Proofs

By allo • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
It doesn’t matter much … because possessing such a certificate doesn’t say you’re the owner of it. To control who’s using the site you would need to both know the certificate, have it contain an image of you and activate your webcam so one can control that you are sitting in front of the PC and not someone else who may be a minor. Effective age verification cannot be done from the remote end. So make the parents accountable for their child’s online behavior instead of the site owners. You can turn off notifications by just switching off networks at night and you can prevent access to porn sites using a filter on your device. Then sites only need to add a flag “adult site” (many already do) and your filter can prevent access to them.

Re:You’re assuming that’s not the point.

By jhoegl • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Google and Facebook are the ones that wrote the bill.
Just so you understand who wants this data.