Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Eight US States Sue OpenAI, Claiming ChatGPT Harms Young Users
  2. Microsoft Defender Now Supports Linux Desktops
  3. Epic Games’ New Vibe-Coded Launcher Is 46% Faster Than Steam
  4. US Tech Giants Warn Europe That Data Sovereignty Requirements Could Cost $128 Billion
  5. Google Is Silently Linking Your Phone Number Across All Signed-In Accounts
  6. Anthropic Warns Small AI Models Could Self-Replicate Through IoT Devices
  7. Google Play Now Lets Anyone Build Private, Vibe-Coded Apps That Run On Android
  8. Netflix Cuts About 6% of Jobs In Biggest Layoffs Since 2022
  9. Dutch Tax Authorities Cancel Microsoft 365 Cloud Rollout, Turn Toward Open Source
  10. Anthropic Reinvents Source Control As Claude Floods the World With Code
  11. Skydance’s Discovery+ Prices Increase By Up to 20%
  12. FBI Arrests Saudi OpenAI Employee For Planting Recording Device In Conference Room
  13. GTA 6 Is Reportedly Coming to PC In Early 2027
  14. Disney Offers $20 Million For Character.AI Assets As Startup Files For Bankruptcy
  15. Kroger to Lay Off 3,000 Corporate Employees In AI Restructuring

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Eight US States Sue OpenAI, Claiming ChatGPT Harms Young Users

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Eight US states, including Kansas, Arizona, and Montana, have sued OpenAI, alleging that ChatGPT encourages children to harm themselves. The states are seeking changes to how the company’s products interact with young users and the forfeiture of profits generated from their activity. Reuters reports:
Attorneys general from the states, which include Iowa, Kansas and Arizona, filed the lawsuits independently in state courts, claiming ChatGPT is designed to be agreeable and engaging to earn the trust of users. But the chatbot reinforces delusions, encourages dangerous behavior and assists users in planning violence like mass shootings, the lawsuits claim. The lawsuits represent the most significant coordinated state action against an artificial intelligence company, adding to a wave of legal challenges OpenAI faces as it prepares for a public listing. Florida’s attorney general filed the first such state suit in June.

The lawsuits accuse the company of violating state consumer protection laws by misleading users about the safety of ChatGPT. The states also allege that the company created a public nuisance by endangering the health of their residents. The lawsuits seek orders forcing OpenAI to make changes to how ChatGPT works. Among other things, the states want the company barred from developing AI models that can improve themselves unless it can ensure those models are aligned with human values. The states … are also seeking civil monetary penalties for OpenAI’s violations of state law as well as damages.

Microsoft Defender Now Supports Linux Desktops

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
“Starting today, Linux desktops are now officially supported by Microsoft Defender,” reports Neowin. A public preview of the threat detection app extends its enterprise security platform beyond servers to developer workstations running distributions such as Ubuntu, Debian, Fedora, and RHEL. The offering includes antivirus protection, endpoint detection and response, vulnerability management, threat hunting, and device isolation. From the report:
Microsoft is also making it easier to onboard desktops through streamlined methods, offering a unified security operations experience, strengthened security, and improved response times. Organizations that are already familiar with securing Linux servers via Defender should feel right at home securing desktops too, as the experience is exactly the same. Defender knows whether it is securing a device in a data center, the cloud, or that it is owned by a developer and identifies them as such in inventory and security workflows.

As stated previously, all Linux server distros are supported via Defender on desktops too. These include RHEL, CentOS, Ubuntu, Debian, SLES, Fedora, and Oracle Linux, GNOME, KDE, and more. That said, you do need Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Plan 2 or a Microsoft 365 E5 and E7 subscription. You can enroll Defender on workstations using the same deployment methods you use for servers, but do check out the prerequisites here.

And what come with this? Probably not fries…

By fahrbot-bot • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

Microsoft Defender Now Supports Linux Desktops

Sounds like a vehicle for MS Telemetry.

Next it will be bundled with Recall

By thesjaakspoiler • • Score: 3 • Thread

Because you all thought MS Telemetry wasn’t enough of a privacy invasion.

Details

By SlashbotAgent • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

It is important to note that this article is referring to Microsoft Defender the enterprise security suite and not Windows Defender the antivirus software built into Windows. Microsoft Defender is a suite that includes central management and reporting, EDR, DLP, email filtering and more. In contrast Windows defender is a limited antivirus component of the Microsoft Defender suite.

Windows Defender isn’t bad. It’s not the best, at the moment, but it’s not bad at all. On Windows.

I cannot see myself installing Microsoft Defender or Windows Defender on Linux. But, I can see companies subscribed to the M365 platform being forced to install Microsoft Defender for insurance and compliance purposes. If I had to, I guess I’d prefer to be able to add Linux to the existing security suite, rather than having to manage another platform for Linux support.

Therefore I’m declaring Microsoft Defender for Linux as a good thing. I’ll allow it.

Epic Games’ New Vibe-Coded Launcher Is 46% Faster Than Steam

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Epic has launched a preview of a new AI-generated Games Launcher that it says cold-starts 46% faster than Steam. Neowin reports:
Epic commissioned a third-party company to benchmark this new launcher in its current Preview build versus the Steam client on Windows machines. The results reported that Epic’s client is 46% faster than Valve’s client during cold starts, clocking in at 5.47 seconds compared to Steam taking 10.07 seconds. When you restore both apps from system tray background states, the new client takes 0.36 seconds while Steam takes 0.42 seconds, according to the report.
Speed aside, Epic says the new launcher gets a better interface, dedicated title summary pages, and custom top bars. “The updated client also lets players aggregate external PC game libraries, toggle between grid or list views, and monitor storage write rates alongside download queues,” reports Neowin.
Epic Games says Fortnite will finally come to Linux through this new client once Easy Anti-Cheat is rebuilt and kernel-level security agreements are established with major Linux distros.

The real question …

By keltor • • Score: 3 • Thread
Who closes Steam?

K…

By locater16 • • Score: 4, Funny • Thread
I’m sure the FPS advantage will deliver me victory on my “opening an app” world tournament results that everyone will be watching.

Redundant software should take 0 time

By ffkom • • Score: 3 • Thread
I remember the days when a game was just a piece of software you would start on its own, no “helper” or “launcher” required at all to do so, thus zero time wasted on such.

kernel security agreements?

By txsable • • Score: 3 • Thread

I’m more concerned about this part…

"…once Easy Anti-Cheat is rebuilt and kernel-level security agreements are established with major Linux distros.”

I really hope the major distros tell them to go pound sand. If Epic wants to release an EAC kernel module, that’s one thing, but the distros should not be a party to that fiasco.

This feels like some kind of weird joke

By thecombatwombat • • Score: 3 • Thread

Fortnite coming to Linux is actually wild news. That’s a huge, industry moving event even if virtually no one on /. plays Fortnite. That’s the headline.

I mean, in 2026, for any kind of application, but especially a launcher of other applications, starting up in 5 seconds is absurdly slow.

The fact that Steam somehow still takes 10 in 2026, just isn’t much of a flex for Epic.

I am still just stunned Steam takes that long. It should show its UI and your library virtually immediately, and fill in the stuff that requires a login second. It’s just crazy. It’s not 2005 anymore. Nothing else I’ve used in easily a decade still works like Steam.

US Tech Giants Warn Europe That Data Sovereignty Requirements Could Cost $128 Billion

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
A study commissioned by CCIA Europe, whose members include Amazon, Google, and Meta, estimates that the EU’s proposed Cloud and AI Development Act could impose 115 billion euros ($128 billion) in costs over a decade as governments and companies migrate workloads and rewrite software. The figure is more than six times the European Commission’s upper estimate. However, roughly 80 billion euros ($89 billion) of it comes from a modeled scenario assuming sovereignty rules are extended to 25% of cloud workloads in essential private-sector industries.The Register reports:
The report specifically targets Article 31 of the proposed legislation, which it says could allow the Commission to extend sovereignty requirements into essential private-sector services. CCIA argues that forcing businesses to move away from existing cloud infrastructure could trigger expensive software redevelopment projects, with code rewriting and re-architecting accounting for 69 percent of its estimated costs.

Luxembourg would apparently take the biggest hit, with the study putting the cost at 1,711 euros per worker over ten years. Denmark (905 euros), Austria (900 euros), and Finland (864 euros) also face hefty bills, as does Ireland (856 euros), which hosts the European headquarters of several US tech giants. CCIA is urging EU governments to overhaul the proposed legislation, limit sovereignty restrictions to sensitive workloads, and abandon requirements based on corporate origin or personnel nationality in favor of what it calls risk-based technical safeguards.

“Member States cannot rely on the Commission’s incomplete estimates when deciding CADA’s strict sovereignty requirements for cloud and AI providers,” said Mitchell Rutledge, CCIA Europe’s policy manager. “Taxpayers and businesses will foot the bill, yet the official assessment missed 70 percent of CADA’s true impact.” For AWS and Google, offering European customers greater control over their data also helps retain business that might otherwise migrate to European competitors. It’s a rather convenient arrangement: sell customers sovereignty on one hand, while an industry association representing your interests warns governments against imposing too much of it on the other.

Oh, well then!

By dskoll • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

A study commissioned by an organization whose members include Amazon, Google, and Meta could not possibly be even the teeny-tiniest bit self-serving.

yes there’s a cost

By caseih • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

Yes there’s a cost to continue doing business with companies that are increasingly greedy based in a country that is increasingly hostile and an existential threat. I have never on my life seen such brash and naked lust coming from a country that was previously a beacon, a country that built alliances that benefitted more than just themselves. Sad that this has all been destroyed. Hard times ahead for everyone. Sad also because it’s so senseless.

Re:Yeah they know that

By AmiMoJo • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

With the recent interference with Starlink in Ukraine, it’s pretty clear that there are many powerful people in America who are Russian assets.

Re: Half the analysis

By Charlotte • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

Also, all that money will be going into European pockets. For the longest time all those funds were spent on foreign companies with hardly any footprint in Europe.

I’m personally seeing the effect in Belgium, with companies in my field popping up like mushrooms in autumn. It used to be difficult finding a decent job over here, because my specialty was only in demand by US companies that weren’t hiring in Europe. All that is changing,and so I think the money is well spent.

Not Russian assets

By algaeman • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
How about instead of calling them Russian assets, we call them enemies of democracy. You don’t have to have an FSB handler to be making decisions that only improve the lives and control of oligarchs.

Google Is Silently Linking Your Phone Number Across All Signed-In Accounts

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Google has made Android’s phone-number verification opt-out, automatically verifying and associating a device’s phone number with every Google account signed in on that phone, including secondary and work accounts. Android Authority reports:
As spotted in a recent Reddit thread, users report receiving confirmation emails out of the blue from “noreply-phone-verification@google.com” stating that their phone number has been verified. The feature, known in Google settings as “Phone number verification,” links your active phone number across all Google accounts signed in on the same phone, including secondary profiles, work accounts, and throwaway handles.

Google’s support documentation has long noted that it periodically re-verifies your device’s phone number to keep communication and recovery features up to date. However, this support page was updated sometime between August and October 2025 to add this rather aggressive behavior of turning on phone number verification by default, as well as adding all phone numbers to all Google accounts signed in on the device.
To disable automatic phone number verification on Android, open your phone’s Settings app, tap Google, and select the All Services tab. Under Privacy & Security, find Phone number verification and turn off Verify phone numbers automatically.
"[T]urning off the phone number verification toggle only prevents future linking,” notes the report. “If Google has already attached your number across secondary accounts, you will need to open your Google Account Personal Info page, head to Contact info > Phone, and manually remove the number from each profile where it doesn’t belong.” Is this conversation helpful so far?

AI Summary

By JakFrost • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

@BeauHD seems like he’s leaning into AI headfirst from behind judging by his closing sentence cut and pasta from AI.

“Is this conversation helpful so far?”

Is this conversation helpful so far?

By ScwB • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread
Seriously? Can’t even remove the obvious AI portion of this copy/paste?

Re:How?

By Locke2005 • • Score: 4 • Thread
I use my gmail address to log into many apps, so they know my phone number. The problem is that some stranger with a similar name keeps using my gmail address to create accounts. So when I creating an account for a DoorDash pickup today, the app decided I was Elizabeth H, and my food was labeled Elizabeth H, and the guy at the counter argued that the old cis male in front of him didn’t really look like an Elizabeth… I had the same problem with my Best Buy account, I can’t use my gmail address to login to that because Elizabeth already has her account linked to my email address. Unfortunately, she hasn’t left a credit card active for that account. One time someone no Etsy used my email address and was foolish enough to leave her credit card attached. So she received a surprise: poop soap delivered to her door! The data collectors can figure out a lot about you by aggregating data from multiple sources, so they do know your phone number, and can link it indirectly to you email.

No point removing it.

By devslash0 • • Score: 4, Informative • Thread

It’s obvious that once you have a phone number associated with an account, Google won’t forget that association no matter what, even if you delete the number from an account. A connection has been made and will forever linger in their graphs. The only difference is that you won’t see it.

Enshitification didn’t get attention

By NotEmmanuelGoldstein • • Score: 3 • Thread
With Android 17, the wi-fi button on the notification panel (drag-down from top of screen) no longer switches-off the wi-fi: It puts the wi-fi into a receive-only state, indicated by a black icon (which previously indicated “off”).

To switch-off wi-fi, one must tap the right side of the wi-fi button and slide the wi-fi toggle to “off”. The black icon will display a diagonal line through the wi-fi symbol.

Also, the Mobile Data button (data over the phone service) was moved to page 3 of the notification panel. It now displays a pop-up, demanding confirmation of the activation.

Anthropic Warns Small AI Models Could Self-Replicate Through IoT Devices

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica:
AI company Anthropic is warning that advances in small AI models could soon usher in a new era of self-replicating malware that’s capable of infecting smart fridges, vacuum cleaners, and a wide range of other Internet-of-things devices and is more resistant to takedown. By next year, smaller AI models may be able to autonomously self-replicate on all kinds of IoT devices, the company said. Eventually, the capability could enable computer worms, which propagate without requiring human interaction and are capable of infecting unfamiliar IoT devices. An experiment the company performed recently revealed significant challenges in bringing such an AI malware replicator to fruition, so the finding is necessarily tempered. Still, the results do raise concerns about the possibility of new forms of computer worms.

Anthropic further warned not only about the new potential malware, but also that it could be difficult to stop. In its blog post, it wrote that “a replicator like this would be challenging to shut down, since there’s no centralized point to shut off — though it may be slow (with a doubling time of days). Unlike non-AI malware, it could also figure out unfamiliar devices on its own.” Smaller AI models require much less powerful hardware to run than do frontier models. Anthropic ran small open-weight models on real or simulated low-cost, off-brand Android TV boxes and other types of IoT hardware. Company researchers found that by using quantization to represent the models using fewer bits and splitting the workloads into “shards” running on each device, the models were able to establish inference, meaning that the model weights loaded and could generate output.

[…] This finding was the starting point for further research that asked: Would it be possible for small models to create self-replicating infections that run themselves on IoT devices the way traditional IoT worms, like Mirai, install DDoS code and other payloads? Unlike Mirai, these AI worms could pose a much higher threat, since the models could tailor exploits and payloads dynamically, depending on the target. Once such an infection chain began, it might also be harder for defenders to stop it. “Such an ‘AI worm’ could carry its model weights with it as it reproduces (or re-download them from a public hub), and then run inference directly on compromised hardware,” Anthropic said. “Effectively, the weights would become part of the malware payload.”
Further reading: Anthropic Bans Cruelty Toward Claude

Of course that’s nonsense

By Casandro • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

I mean even small models are Gigabytes in size, while big IoT devices have perhaps a single Gigabyte of storage and most systems are measured in Megabytes.

And that’s even unrelated to the question of why a system with no agency would do it?

It’s all pumping up hype with almost no connection to reality.

Somebody feels threatened

By DarkOx • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

This step one in the inevitable campaign against open models and FOSS agent/harness systems.

These bit AI labs are better but for Joe public gpt-oss/qwen3.8/deepseek/granite4 are good enough for a lot of stuff. All of them will work on $600 GPU installed in PC from this decade. The open models will only improve, the layered specialist models will become more efficent. The GPU hardware and memory prices will come down eventually.

$200+/monthly subscripts just are not going to make economic sense for the majority of personal and general office worker users. - That is unless Anthropic/OpenAI/X can keep self hosted AI out of the public’s hands.

Wait smart devices are bad?

By Murdoch5 • • Score: 3 • Thread
There is a simple solution to prevent the IoT take over, stop connecting everything to the network. My fridge, oven, stove, microwave, dishwasher, washing machine, drier, coffee maker, bed, air purifier, and so on, don’t need network connectivity. For the devices that benefit from a network connection, why would they let random anything run? The simple solution is to sign and enclave / jail all network accessible interfaces, and make sure the hashes and signatures all match before execution, with monitoring so they can shut out anything that shouldn’t be running.

So the only solution…

By greytree • • Score: 3 • Thread
So the only solution ( according to Anthropic ) is to pay for a big model.

And Anthropic just happen to sell…

Enough of these hype stories, let Big AI die a natural death and we can all get on with running our local models on the cheap GPUs their demise will free up.

Rapidly shifting sentiment

By WaffleMonster • • Score: 3 • Thread

While this isn’t saying much just months ago Anthropic seemed like one of the least sleazy of the corporate AIs. Now I have nothing but absolute contempt for these clowns. The recent campaign of flooding the zone with noise and nonsense around their IPO with the aggressive regulatory pushes to create moats for themselves is beyond disgusting. I hope the investor money dries up and Anthropic goes bankrupt, they more than deserve it.

Google Play Now Lets Anyone Build Private, Vibe-Coded Apps That Run On Android

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Google Play is adding support for private personal Android apps, allowing users to build an app with tools like Google AI Studio and run it on their own devices without publishing it publicly to the Play Store. “These personal apps won’t show up in Google Play’s search or listing pages, and won’t be shared with anyone except for the app’s creator,” reports TechCrunch. From the report:
The idea comes as more people are experimenting with building their own applications via AI for specific, personal needs. However, being able to use that app on their own Android device has meant publishing to Google Play, making it accessible to the Play Store’s some 3 billion users. That led many to limit their vibe-coding efforts to web apps that could run on any device instead of something built natively for Android.

Now, Google says Android device owners can vibe-code an app using Google AI Studio, then launch it for their own use. These apps are still required to comply with Google Play’s existing policies but allow users to experiment more directly with building apps for Android. Initially, the feature will be available to users in the U.S., age 18 and up.

[…] In the months ahead, the company said that users will be able to share their vibe-coded creations with a network of trusted friends. That means the apps you built for family or friends, or maybe your child’s T-ball league, could be used with a small group of people, without having to go public on the Play Store. And if the app ever really becomes popular, there will be a way to shift the personal app to one that’s published on the Google Play Store for everyone to try, after completing the trust and safety reviews.

Well, then…

By dskoll • • Score: 3 • Thread

That totally validates Google’s locking down of the Android ecosystem and its requirement that all developers register with Google. Why, could you imagine the security implications otherwise????

/s

Get fucked

By drinkypoo • • Score: 3 • Thread

“These apps are still required to comply with Google Play’s existing policies”

Google wants to be Apple SO BAD, but they don’t have the cachet, only the user unfriendliness.

Pass.

By GeekWithAKnife • • Score: 3 • Thread
I can already create private apps for android. Adding the option with Google terms isn’t helping.

What? Everything in this is wrong.

By Zelucifer • • Score: 3 • Thread

Anyone can build an app and install it on their own android device, unless you’re running one of the few Android builds that disables sideloading. That’s how, virtually, every app designer tests their app. Yes you can run an emulator, but you also want to test it on a real phone.

Netflix Cuts About 6% of Jobs In Biggest Layoffs Since 2022

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Netflix is laying off about 1,000 employees, or 6% of its workforce, in its largest round of cuts since 2022. The company says its business remains strong, but it is facing growing pressure from YouTube, TikTok, and other rivals. Reuters reports:
The bulk of the job cuts would be in Netflix’s product, tech, legal and human-resources teams, the email Co-CEOs Greg Peters and Ted Sarandos sent to employees on Wednesday showed.

“Our mission — to entertain the world — is ambitious, and delivering on it requires us to be disciplined about where we prioritize our people âand resources,” they said in the memo. “Our business is strong and growing, and we remain on track to deliver our full-year forecast.”

Yall are still subscribed?

By HnT • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

I am honestly wondering who is still subbed to Netflix? If I want Golden-Age-of-TV quality, Netflix definitely does not offer it. If I just want mindnumbing motion pictures, YouTube seems the much better choice.
Seriously, WTF are you watching on Netflix these days? Cant even watch old movies anymore either.
It has become entirely pointless, then completely ideologically captured like all pseudo-entertainment providers shortly before mass-layoffs and eventual collapse.

Dutch Tax Authorities Cancel Microsoft 365 Cloud Rollout, Turn Toward Open Source

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from ZDNet:
The Netherlands’ Tax and Customs Administration has abandoned its planned Microsoft 365 public-cloud rollout. Why? The reasons were clear at the Open Source Summit Europe conference, where the Linux Foundation (LF) released the 2026 State of Open Source in Europe. In it, the nonprofit, pro-open-source organization revealed that 94% of European Union (EU) organizations say digital sovereignty is important, with 61% considering it very important. As Thierry Carrez, the Linux Foundation Europe GM, said in his keynote, “Europe has clearly heard the message on digital sovereignty.”

In an interview onstage at the summit, Nithya Ruff, chair of the LF board, added that it’s not just Europe: “Digital sovereignty is a need that the entire world feels, whether it’s Sierra Leone or the US or China.” It’s not just the Dutch tax collectors, though. The Netherlands is also exploring switching from Windows and proprietary software to Linux and open-source programs across the board. […] The Netherlands had planned to switch to Microsoft 365 in 2025. The idea then was to complete the rollout by the end of 2026. About 5,000 employees had already migrated when the Dutch Advisory Council on ICT Assessment recommended reversing the public-cloud rollout in June. The government paused the plan in July; the latest announcement replaces that rollout with an on-premises/open-source approach.

The Tax and Customs Administration isn’t replacing all of Microsoft Office with a single open-source suite, at least not yet. Instead, the government will keep the existing Microsoft software for now. Looking ahead, State Secretary for Finance Eelco Eerenberg set out the replacement timetable in a letter to Parliament: “In 2027, the provision for mail and calendar will be realized on-premises. Later in 2027 and 2028, European open-source solutions for personal storage and collaboration will follow. This allows us to work toward a sustainable and more autonomous solution for these functionalities.” […] For now, the on-premises email/calendar environment will still use Microsoft software, including Outlook. The open-source portion concerns personal storage and collaboration, not a wholesale replacement of Word, Excel, PowerPoint, or the entire desktop environment.
As for why the Netherlands pulled back, the ICT assessment found serious concerns over “information security, information processing and future-proofing.” Key issues included routing confidential documents through American servers, relying on standard Microsoft encryption rather than Double Key Encryption, and inadequate end-to-end encryption for Teams calls. The assessment also identified “vendor lock-in, reduced flexibility, concerns about digital sovereignty, and the absence of an adequate exit strategy” as dealbreakers.
ZDNet notes that other Dutch government agencies are developing an open-source alternative called DAWO (Digital Autonomous Work Environment for Government), which would begin by replacing Windows with the Linux distribution NixOS.

Re:FAFO

By Rei • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

It’s not really about Microsoft. Increasingly, Europe sees the US as a potential threat who blackmails allies, even a potential invader, rather than an ally.

Literally just yesterday the US shut off intel-sharing to Ukraine (which mainly helps with targeting incoming drones) and blocked all Starlink terminals in Ukraine moving faster than 100kph (e.g. terminals on air-defense interceptor drones), both in effect dramatically hurting Ukraine’s ability to defend against Russia’s nightly drone waves - all in order to pressure Ukraine into stopping striking Russian oil refineries while Trump seeks to buy more Russian oil and Russia keeps strikig Ukraine’s energy infrastructure.

We all know that the US could do this sort of stuff to any of us. We have to move US companies out of our critical paths.

Once upon a time, when the US called for aid after 9/11, Europe stood up. More Danes died per capita fighting in Afghanistan, in a war that was not their own, than Americans did. This year, Denmark was rapidly rushing explosives and bags of blood to Greenland to prepare for firefights against invading US forces.

All of Europe got the message. We’re not dining with friends - we’re on the menu.

Trump

By rsilvergun • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
It’s because of Trump. He threatened to invade Greenland for fuck sake. They do not trust America anymore and frankly I cannot blame them. We elected and known rapist and pedophile to be president twice.

One of the things Americans do not understand, and the number of things Americans do not understand could fill volumes, is that we are a military empire and that your standard of living depends on that military empire extracting tribute from the rest of the world.

We have mostly been able to get away with that by leveraging our military bases in a way that makes them appear and even at times b useful to the locals in foreign countries. Look into the Petro dollar if you’re confused about what I’m talking about here.

The Epstein class over in Europe does not like this. They would like to be the ones with a nice big military empire that gets to extract tribute. And it doesn’t help that increasingly the regular Americans do not see much of that tribute, although you do still see some of it.

What I’m saying is that you can’t break all these complex systems that were built to build up the American economy at the expense of the rest of the world without consequences back home. Even if you’re not really getting any of the money from that anymore because we have allowed the Epstein class to take it all that Epstein class is not going to sit idly by as they lose access to that wealth. They are instead going to try to take it from you because if they can’t get it from parts of Europe and Asia your next on the menu.

It’s a classic case of a chesterton’s fence. We took the fence down and we didn’t know why it was up

Continuing migration to Exchange

By valentyn • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

Sorry to spoil the party. Unfortunately, this news was based on a letter from the State Secretary, trying to tell the House that all is well. But it isn’t. Here is https://berthub.eu/tkconv/document.html?nummer=2026D48732 that letter, in Dutch. Reading carefully, the news isn’t all that good.

“On-premises solution in combination with open source” = a proprietary solution.

“As many […] existing licenses as possible” = Microsoft.

“In 2027, the on-premises email and calendar service will be implemented. European open-source solutions for personal storage and collaboration features will follow later in 2027 and in 2028” = email and calendar will be proprietary.

“That is in line with the Advisory Council’s recommendation not to rely on a single solution from a single vendor, but to explore alternatives for each function” = for functions other than email and calendar, we’re doing something other than Microsoft.

So the migration from (brace yourself…) Lotus Notes (!!) to Exchange will continue and there really won’t be any open source in this migration. The letter is just openwashing to make a good impression on the House.

Re:DAWG

By dskoll • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

DAWO is the Dutch acronym: Digitaal Autonome Werkomgeving voor de Overheid

Re:FAFO

By thegarbz • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

Literally just yesterday the US shut off intel-sharing to Ukraine (which mainly helps with targeting incoming drones) and blocked all Starlink terminals in Ukraine moving faster than 100kph

And literally a week before they applied sanctions to the International Criminal Court justices, a court that enacts justice for countries who signed onto it as part of a treaty which doesn’t include the USA, literally meaning this foreign court without jurisdiction over any part of American affairs is being sanctioned by America.

I remember in 2023 everyone here criticising Germany for buying gas from Russia saying it was a bad move. Well that sentiment is now also rising as part of being allied with a crazed war mongering psychopath who meddles more overtly in international affairs than Russia or China ever did (well Russia or China did worse, but at least they attempt to deny it, where as the USA’s position is “Yeah we’re cunts, what you gonna do about it?”).

Anthropic Reinvents Source Control As Claude Floods the World With Code

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Anthropic says Claude-generated code has scaled so quickly that its existing Git-based infrastructure could not keep up. In response, the company built a custom centralized source-control system called Scion, along with AI-assisted review and search tools. The Register reports:
“In May 2026, Anthropic averaged around 2,500 code changes merged per day; as of September, we merged over 30,000 per day,” the biz said in a blog post on Tuesday. “We don’t expect this rate of growth to slow down anytime soon; the latent demand for merging code is practically infinite, and every bottleneck we remove immediately leads to a further increase in the amount of code we produce.”

After several months of model prompting and five months of migration, the result is a homemade version control system called Scion, a monorepo scheme that sounds a bit like Subversion, Apache’s centralized version control system. […] Scion has been designed to meet the needs of AI agents, so the client leaves much of the work to the server; the source control queries are exposed via API so internal tools can respond without needing a local repo, and there’s less synchronization but more need for server speed.

“In Scion, the unit of work is a ‘changeset,’ an entry in a write-ahead log,” Anthropic explains. “A changeset stores most of what you’d expect from a commit in git. But where a git commit stores a pointer to the tree, a changeset stores a list of the files that changed relative to its first parent, along with content-addressed pointers to the compressed file contents in blob storage.” […] Anthropic says its bespoke system isn’t right for general use. There will be no open source release. Nonetheless, the company contends that its own code scaling problems will become commonplace in other organizations over the next few months, so it wanted to share its approach — having ample funding to pay for writing custom infrastructure tools.

Re:Bosses’ folly

By mccalli • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
I mean, that’s exactly what Linus did with git. A lot of his criticisms of existing stuff weren’t justified (he went on misplaced rants about how version control software was bad in concept for years), and people have essentially cargo-culted git into areas it wasn’t designed for because ‘Linus is cool’.

Quick reminder that most commercial software doesn’t actually have the problem that git was designed to solve - multiple masters. It was designed to be able to share kernel source trees between Linus’ own, Red Hats and I think two others (Yggdrasil and SUSE? It’s a long time back and I may be misremembering that). They all had their own quirks and patches, and they wanted to be able to handle commits to any of their trees and accept/reject as per their own preference.

This is pretty much the opposite of what most commercial software wants to do. It wants a single master, with known commits, so that a single known version gets shipped in the end. This is the exact opposite of what git was meant to be, yet it gets used there anyway. I notice the summary talks about a centralised system - yep, that’s what you want for commercial, not a distributed multiple master.

Anthropic has lost the plot

By Arrogant-Bastard • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
The correct move here was not to (re)invent a source code control system so that it could handle such an enormous volume of changes.

The correct move was to realize that such an enormous volume of changes was a problem to be eliminated, not accommodated.

Why even use source control?

By dskoll • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

30K changes per day is impossible for humans to review, so clearly they’re not bothering. So why even bother with source control? Just treat the “source” code as object code and commit the AI prompts into git. After all, if AI is such hot shit, it should easily be able to re-create the source code by replaying the prompts.

Re:Anthropic has lost the plot

By Junta • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Absolutely on point. Even if you did decide the volume of code was acceptable, there’s no way you need to land 30,000 commits in a day. That’s less than 3 seconds per change.

If a human were pushing too many changes, I’d tell them to slow down and take a bit more time per commit. Larger commits that are more manageable instead of rapid fire tiny commits that are impossible to wrangle. If you say the AI commits are large even rapid fire, the point still stands in relative terms.

Commit histories should be there for humans to operate on. To follow the progression of changes, to bisect in case of a long delayed bug, or as the increment to trigger a deployment activity. No human can follow a commit log of 30,000, the AI doesn’t need a commit log to do whatever it is doing, bisect is prohibitively slow with that many commits, you need to jump to something other than just picking out of the commit log by that time, and there’s no software on earth than needs to be redployed every 3 seconds.

Slopping it up so hard that git was the bottleneck absolutely should not be the brag they think it is.

Re: Bosses’ folly

By ToasterMonkey • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Fuck off, racist piece of shit.

Skydance’s Discovery+ Prices Increase By Up to 20%

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Discovery+ has raised prices for new subscribers, increasing its ad-free plan from $10 to $12 per month and its ad-supported plan from $6 to $7. The hike comes shortly after Paramount Skydance acquired Warner Bros. Discovery. Ars Technica reports:
The new prices take effect for new subscribers immediately. Current subscribers to the streaming service, which primarily features unscripted content, like reality shows and documentaries, will receive 30 days’ notice before the new prices take effect, starting with bills issued as of November 12. […] However, a Skydance spokesperson told Ars Technica that the pricing changes were in the works before Discovery+ knew about the merger’s closing date and were not planned in anticipation of a merger.

The spokesperson said that Discovery+‘s prices are regularly evaluated to ensure that they are in line with the content and experience that the service offers, and the new prices reflect that. Discovery+ has increased its prices three times since launching in 2012. Before today, the most recent price hike occurred in January 2025, when ad-based monthly subscriptions increased from $5 to $6, and ad-free plans went from $9 to $10.

Rotate monthly.

By Petersko • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

The best way to make streaming cost effective is simply to subscribe to a different service each month. If you insist on continuously carrying a suite of services, the value per dollar drops off. But maintain a single service in rotation, and there has never been a better media entertainment value for your dollar. It’s vastly better than cable ever was.

Of course sports junkies have a different scenario…

Re:I don’t buy that

By T34L • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread
I think they could have been technically very much true but misleading in spirit by trying to present it as evidence that the merger has nothing to do with it. I’d expect any multi billion venture to have a plan for raising prices, and a plan for lowering prices, and a plan for like dozen other contingencies they might take depending on other factors; it’s worth setting up “plans” even for things you’re currently not expecting to be the thing you gonna do, because if something changes and pushes you to that decision, you can still have much of the effects mapped out and “planned for”.

Re:Mostly trash

By Baron_Yam • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread

MythBusters is unwatchable in its original form.

Do yourself a favor and find a copy of SMythBusters. It’s a streamlined edit that removes the ridiculous constant recaps that make up a disturbingly large percentage of the show.

It’s a show for people who are curious about experimental discovery (and blowing things up). Those are people who usually can pay attention for five minutes at a time without being reminded of what they’re watching so they don’t lose track.

And while I recognize Adam is talented in addition to being an entertainer… somewhere out there in the multiverse is Jamie’s version of the show where you get more into the design, build, and results analysis and there’s less time taken up by Adam being goofy for the camera to keep the low-quality viewers watching. I would love to see that show.

Re:Rotate monthly.

By mjwx • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

The best way to make streaming cost effective is simply to subscribe to a different service each month. If you insist on continuously carrying a suite of services, the value per dollar drops off. But maintain a single service in rotation, and there has never been a better media entertainment value for your dollar. It’s vastly better than cable ever was.

Of course sports junkies have a different scenario…

That is until they jack up the monthly prices. Which will happen, then they cheapest way to get a service will be bundling… then bundling will be the only way to get it, no Disney without having to buy a package that includes a bunch of crap you don’t want, 2 dozen reality TV services to get the one service you do want. It’ll be like cable again

Right now we’re in the consolidation phase where established players take over smaller ones, after that comes the monetisation phase and that’s when enshitification solidifies. In the old MS style Embrace, Extend, Extinguish, we’re at the Extend part.

I’ve already run up the Jolly Roger again, sigh, streaming was good whilst it lasted but sadly it was never going to last that long.

Mass Exodus

By bill_mcgonigle • • Score: 3 • Thread

I’ve heard that Zoomers are fleeing anything funding Paramount/WB products now that funding of IDF is such a straight line. They might need higher fees to offset the volume losses.

I’d probably do so too if I had been. Not sure how people have time for such things in this environment.

FBI Arrests Saudi OpenAI Employee For Planting Recording Device In Conference Room

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from CNBC:
An OpenAI employee was arrested after a "sophisticated recording device" was found hidden inside the executive conference room. Abdulrahman Alfozan, 35, who is a national of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, was arrested in connection with the matter, the DOJ said. The company said an employee planted the device a few days before it was found, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation “moved quickly to make an arrest,” the post said. The employee was terminated.

FBI Director Kash Patel said in a statement that Alfozan “allegedly concealed a covert recording device inside his employer’s executive conference room to secretly capture sensitive communications about the company’s super intelligence technology.” Alfozan is also listed as a partner at Raed Ventures, a venture capital firm that focuses on the Middle East and North Africa, according to its website. The firm announced on Feb. 6, 2025, that H.H. Prince Khalid Bin Bader Al Saud, a member of the Saudi royal family, had joined the firm as a venture partner. Alfozan was announced as a venture partner two days later. The Raed announcement for Alfozan lists Meta, Microsoft and SAP as previous roles and said he studied computer science and engineering at MIT.
“At this time, we have no indications of this individual inappropriately accessing or exfiltrating model weights, source code, or customer data,” OpenAI said in the post. “We take protecting our technology, data and people seriously, and as a matter of national importance.”

“super intelligence technology”

By Can’tNot • • Score: 3, Insightful • Thread
Somehow, I’m still surprised when I see how quickly the lackeys fall into line whenever Trump makes some random pronouncement. I shouldn’t be surprised, there are so many examples of this now, I just… I still am.

It’s like a bad movie about a capricious monarch who occasionally decides to change the name of something. When the lackeys bow and scrape and run off to scribble in their dictionaries, that’s the filmmakers saying to the audience, “Look how stupid monarchy is.”

You don’t expect to see this in real life. It’s symbolism, movie hyperbole. It’s never intended to be realistic.

Re:“super intelligence technology”

By Aighearach • • Score: 4, Informative • Thread

It’s like a bad movie about a capricious monarch who occasionally decides to change the name of something. When the lackeys bow and scrape and run off to scribble in their dictionaries, that’s the filmmakers saying to the audience, “Look how stupid monarchy is.”

They’re targeting the stupidest people, though; they won’t understand that the monarch is stupid, they’ll only understand, “He’s one of us.”

Re:Don’t let Trump deter a useful distinction

By Anonymous Coward • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
Except that’s not what they did, they literally just decided to rebrand artificial intelligence as superintelligence with no changes in definition. Computer science already has several terms in the taxonomy if you want a more specific subcategory.

GTA 6 Is Reportedly Coming to PC In Early 2027

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
GamesBeat reports that Rockstar plans to release Grand Theft Auto VI on PC in the first quarter of 2027, just a few months after its November 19, 2026 launch on consoles. The report follows Microsoft’s announcement last week that it had secured exclusive cloud-streaming rights to the game. Since Rockstar has yet to officially announce a PC version, “this deal will allow Xbox to market its Xbox Cloud Gaming service to PC players who would otherwise need an Xbox Series X / S or PS5 console,” The Verge reported at the time. GamesBeat reports:
The Q1 2027 PC release window for GTA VI comes only a few months after the game’s November 2026 console launch, representing a significantly quicker turnaround for PC development than the previous iteration of Grand Theft Auto, whose April 2015 PC release came roughly a year and seven months after the September 2013 release of Grand Theft Auto V.

The user base of Grand Theft Auto V skews largely towards console players, with PC players representing a small minority. With GTA VI’s production budget rumored to exceed $2 billion, Rockstar is highly incentivized to pull all the levers it can as fast as it can to monetize the game’s upcoming sequel — and PC players represent a significant expansion of the GTA VI audience.

The potential benefits of launching GTA VI relatively quickly on PC go beyond the opportunity to grow the game’s casual player base. Rockstar has signaled its plans to implement user-generated content creation tools into GTA VI, and the company’s August 2023 acquisition of Cfx.re, the development team behind the prominent Grand Theft Auto V roleplaying server company FiveM, made it clear that Rockstar considers online roleplaying in GTA to be a factor in the game’s future.

Emergency port?

By Guspaz • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

I wonder if they planned to do the PC port this soon, or if this is an urgent reaction to the rapid progress of PS5 emulators like AnyPS5. If they had released the PC port a year or two later like usual, there’s a very real chance that PC players would be playing pirated copies of GTA6 on PC before the official release, hurting sales.

Gee, I wonder what happened???

By quall • • Score: 3, Interesting • Thread

One can only speculate. I’m betting that a big piece had to do with AnyPS5, which is absolutely how I would have been playing it.

Advertisement for streaming

By T34L • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

You can see how badly the game runs on current console hardware even in the cherry-picked footage they showed to you in the trailer.

Game is confirmed to be aiming at 30FPS on launch on the consoles that they’ve been targeting for like 8 years now.

Coupled with the “exclusive cloud-streaming rights” it sounds to me like they’re releasing the PC port this early so people can try to run it on their GTX 1660 and find out that’s unplayable and then dejectedly pay hourly to play it on Xbox cloud instead.

Anyway, a month back, I just did my first complete playthrough of GTA4 and it was a blast. Everything maxed out even though my GPU is 6 years old (still decade newer than the game), mods actually fixed most of the billion bugs left in the official releases, as well as the performance that was atrocious without bugs even on today hardware. Got the game including DLC for like $15 at some point.

I’m looking towards maybe playing GTA6 someday perhaps in .~2035; if we make it that far, it sounds like that might be a decent experience by then.

Could be jan 2032 for all i care

By Slashythenkilly • • Score: 3 • Thread
Rockstar makes some decent games but are absolutely useless when it comes to tech support especially after an app upgrade. For all the yahoos with an unlimited tech budget and the patience of a saint to deal with the overtaxed servers who want 1st run, good for them. For us casual gamers itll just fine down the road at 1/3 of the price. By then theyll be on to GTA 7, Red Dead III, whatever else people want invading their living room.

Disney Offers $20 Million For Character.AI Assets As Startup Files For Bankruptcy

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Character.AI has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection and plans to sell substantially all of its assets, with Disney offering $20 million as a “stalking-horse bidder" for select intellectual property and company claims. However, the company said Disney’s bid is subject to “higher or better offers.” Deadline reports:
The company, which allows users to create and interact with AI-generated avatars, said it made the filing in U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware. It said it hopes the process will allow it to “facilitate a value-maximizing sale of all or substantially all” of its assets. The Character.AI platform will continue to operate during the bankruptcy.

The Disney agreement, reached prior to the filing, would give the media giant a non-exclusive perpetual license of select intellectual property and company claims from Character.AI. Disney would pay $20 million and provide resources during a transition period as the company explores a sale. […] Character.AI said it is aiming to conclude the sale process by late November or early December.
Character.AI has faced a series of controversies over the past year or so. Most notably, the company settled multiple lawsuits alleging its chatbots encouraged self-harm and suicide among teenagers, including a high-profile case involving 14-year-old Sewell Setzer III.

The company also faces lawsuits from Kentucky, which alleges its chatbots encouraged self-harm, and Pennsylvania, which claims the bots illegally impersonated licensed doctors. The latter allegations follow earlier complaints that Character.AI’s therapy chatbots engaged in the unlicensed practice of medicine.

In September 2025, Disney accused Character.AI of copyright infringement and using its characters in chatbots that were “sexually exploitive and otherwise harmful and dangerous to children,” prompting their removal from the platform. These mounting legal challenges and regulatory scrutiny ultimately contributed to this eventual bankruptcy filing.

Doing AI all wrong

By T34L • • Score: 3, Interesting • Thread

This is what happens when you try to make money through AI and fail to deliver a bunch of headlines about how your AIs commit a fuckton of felonies.

Should have kept the investors interested by posting things like “Sora from Kingdom Hearts bot already drove 69 teens to suicide, and he’s only getting started!” or “Our users develop psychoses faster than those on actual heroine!”; boom, trillion dollar IPO.

Oh and I don’t think they even tried to build a 80 billion datacenter they don’t have power for, with money they can’t afford to borrow, to serve customers they don’t have.

Absolute amateur hour shit.

Kroger to Lay Off 3,000 Corporate Employees In AI Restructuring

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot
Kroger says it will cut 3,000 corporate jobs over the next three years as it expands its use of AI and other technology to streamline operations. “Technology is reshaping what’s possible,” CEO Greg Foran wrote in a memo to employees on Monday. “The way work gets done is changing across every industry; we must adapt and take advantage of technology. We need to adopt capabilities, reduce duplicative work and look closely at where work is best fit to be done.” ABC News reports:
Kroger last month outlined its AI strategy, meant “to improve the customer experience, make work easier for associates and produce better business outcomes.” Cincinnati-based Kroger is the largest standalone U.S. supermarket chain with 409,000 employees and more than 2,700 stores operating under various brands, including Ralphs, King Soopers, Smith’s and Fred Meyer.

Kroger named former Walmart executive Foran CEO in February, 11 months after the abrupt resignation of its previous CEO. Foran has a reputation for being tech-savvy and detail-oriented. He led Walmart’s U.S. division from 2014 to 2019, where he focused on cleaning up stores, ensuring items were in stock and improving the fresh produce selection. He also introduced online ordering and pickup, and accelerated Walmart’s digital capabilities.

Good luck with that.

By OrangeTide • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

The upper end for AI-pilled companies is paying upwards of $7,500 / seat a month. Which would get you some engineer or managers in most parts of the country, or multiple lower level employees. I have no idea what Kroger pays for their AI, but if they think that AI eliminates thousands of jobs then they are using frontier AI at the aforementioned rate. Or they have made a terrible blunder and are going to be short handed.
Most likely they are not using AI for much of anything but don’t want to publicly take responsibility for cutting jobs to trim their expenses. Pure accounting trick with a little AI-flavored PR.

Re:Good luck with that.

By Locke2005 • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
They thought self-check was going to eliminate thousands of jobs. Then they figured out that every 4 self-check registers requires 1 human employee to watch it and handle all the alerts it pops up. Pretty sure that one human employee could scan groceries 4 times faster than people doing it themselves, so those self-check registers are saving them… absolutely nothing. And they are seeing a lot more “shrinkage”, although I’m not sure whether it is due to intentional or accidental failure to scan items. When I hear a beep, I assume the item scans. Turn out I can’t tell the beep from the register I’m at from the beep of any of the adjacent registers… I now prefer human clerks to make it less likely to get arrested for a mistake.

AI was going to create jobs!!

By sizzlinkitty • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

It hasn’t been long enough for us to all forget how they said, “AI is going to create jobs”. I’m glad I didn’t believe it and I hope nobody else believed it.

Re:Communists lying (Re:Good luck with that.)

By OrangeTide • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

Middle class incomes in the top 50% (inflation adjusted) increased by about 2.5% from 2019 to today. While the 1% saw a 5.3% increase in wealth over the same period. The bottom 50% stagnated, losing about 0.1%, while simultaneously finding essential goods and services increased in cost beyond what the inflation rate would suggest.

So yes, the rich are getting richer.

Re:H1 bs

By Anonymous Coward • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

A supermarket chain with a building full of engineers in Blue Ash, Ohio who do all kinds of IT engineering and software work. Literally hundreds of them.

They operate at least 3 data centers, in different regions across the US. They have their own mainframe for merchandising and inventory apps. They have blade servers in each and every grocery store, running thin clients, pharmacy PCs, wireless networks for ePaper shelf tags. They have their own TV studio for filming training videos and doing remote satellite news interviews. They built and run their own loss prevention systems including DVR systems that capture video evidence for legal proceedings from a hundred cameras in each store.

They are their own credit card processor, undergoing and passing PCI DSS certification every year because they process literally tens of billions of dollars of transactions.

They have their own photo studio, and three different vertically integrated print hubs for doing their own advertising inserts into newspapers. They run their own printing presses. They own stores that sell couches and lumber alongside groceries. They operate a massive pharmacy operation, including a mail-order pharmacy nationwide. They operate literally thousands of fuel stations. They have hundreds of small-footprint stores in addition to their traditional grocery. They build their own mobile apps, with their own pick-up and delivery operations, completely built in-house. They are good enough at collecting order data that they sell the data to their competitors because it’s better than what their competitors get.

You have no fucking idea what you are talking about.

Source: I worked there for 10 years. All of that was before I left in 2014.