Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Google Unveils Gemini 4 Argon, Retaking Benchmark Lead Over OpenAI and Anthropic
  2. ‘Xbox Is Not For Sale,’ Says Microsoft’s Gaming Chief
  3. Hackers Stole Millions of US Military Personnel Records During Months-Long Data Breach
  4. Google Reportedly Tests Paying Publishers For AI Search Results
  5. Reddit Is Killing RSS Feeds, Ending Public API Access
  6. Singapore Pilots a Government-Built Dating Service
  7. Trump Administration Launches New AI-Powered ‘America.gov’ Website
  8. Trump Hosts AI CEOs to Discuss Safety Standards, Rebrands AI as ‘Super Intelligence’
  9. Dutch Police Arrest ‘Reformed’ Hacker In Shiny Hunters Investigation
  10. Wearable Nanotech Could Combat Nerve Agents
  11. The Night Sky Is Getting 10% Brighter Every Year
  12. Tech Workers Made ChatGPT Drive a Toyota Corolla
  13. Firefox Redesign Brings Round Tabs, New Themes, and Compact Mode
  14. Microsoft Makes Linux Containers Native On Windows 11
  15. Mistral CEO Says US AI Safety Debate Masks Competitors’ ‘Negligence’

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Google Unveils Gemini 4 Argon, Retaking Benchmark Lead Over OpenAI and Anthropic

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Google has unveiled Gemini 4 Argon, a new frontier AI model that it says leads or ties rivals on 13 of 18 disclosed benchmarks. The model is initially being released only to trusted cyber defenders and select pre-release testers, with broader availability planned later. VentureBeat reports:
Google is not claiming that Gemini 4 Argon wins every benchmark. But across the benchmark table disclosed in the company’s embargoed materials, Argon posts the highest score, or ties for the highest score, in more categories than GPT-6 Astra or Claude Opus 5.5. Across the 18 benchmarks Google disclosed, Argon leads outright on 12 and ties for first on one. GPT-6 Astra leads outright on three and ties Argon on one. Claude Opus 5.5 leads outright on two. That makes Argon the leading frontier model by total number of benchmark leads or top scores in Google’s comparison set, even though the results show a still-close race in which OpenAI and Anthropic retain advantages in several important technical categories.

[…] The result is a more nuanced claim than “best model across the board.” Argon appears to have the broadest top-score profile among the three frontier models in Google’s disclosed comparison, but GPT-6 Astra remains ahead in several software, science-terminal and computer-use tasks, while Claude Opus 5.5 remains ahead in terminal-agent and post-training workflows. For enterprise buyers, that means model choice is still workload-dependent, even if Argon now gives Google its strongest claim yet to overall frontier leadership by benchmark count. […] Argon also expands Google’s output ceiling. The company says the model supports an industry-leading 1 million output tokens, up from a previous 64,000-token limit. That is a notable distinction for agentic software engineering, audit, migration and legal-review workloads where the value of a model often depends on how long it can sustain a chain of work before handing control back to a human.

Benchmarks

By HiThere • • Score: 4, Informative • Thread

The trouble with benchmarks is that they are often gamed. So while this is interesting, one should remain a bit reserved, awaiting assessments more reflecting the way people use it.

It’s #10 on LMArena leaderboard

By outsider007 • • Score: 3 • Thread

Let’s let someone else do the benchmark, how about?

Output tokens

By Uldis Segliņš • • Score: 3 • Thread
“how long it can sustain a chain of work before handing control back to a human” or said plainly “before it fails with full speed wall break”.

It’s a race!

By OrangeTide • • Score: 4, Funny • Thread

First one to pop the bubble is the “winner”

‘Xbox Is Not For Sale,’ Says Microsoft’s Gaming Chief

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Xbox CEO Asha Sharma says Microsoft has no plans to sell the gaming business, telling The New York Times that “Xbox is not for sale” and that the company intends to take a long-term view. Windows Central reports:
Microsoft’s vast layoffs across the summer have hit Xbox in their thousands, with studios like Ninja Theory on the path to being closed, and others like Double Fine being divested completely. Microsoft has effectively shut down Halo Studios itself and handed off the franchise to Call of Duty showrunners instead, as Xbox aggressively seeks to restructure for its next decade.

[…] The NYT interviewed (paywall) Sharma recently covering the Xbox layoffs generally. The outlet said that Asha “did not stall” in declaring Xbox not-for-sale. “Xbox is not for sale. […] We will do whatever it takes to set the company up for success, and we will look at the right partnerships, the right operating model and everything needed to achieve that. […] We’ve got a long way to go with Microsoft and we’re going to take the long-term view.”

The NYT quite patronizingly called the comment a “bob and weave” seemingly unwilling to let go of the idea of divestiture. It’s great shareholder bait; Xbox has long been an aspirational type of product, and it has been a loss leader in some regards. Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella has remarked in the past about how, despite the fact Xbox isn’t a huge profit generator, fandom of the brand has led to lucrative deals for Azure on the business side of things. Yet, shareholders would love nothing more than for Microsoft to quit the difficult and risky game industry to dive all-in on AI psychosis products instead…

Uh oh!

By Local ID10T • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

That is what they always say right before announcing the sale.

“It’s not for sale.”
…
“Welcome to our new corporate owners.”
…
“We couldn’t tell you because the negotiations were under NDA.”

Re:Uh oh!

By ffkom • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

That is what they always say right before announcing the sale.

… or what one would say knowing that there are no bidders offering any substantial amount of money for that dead brand name, anyway.

Re:Uh oh!

By sg_oneill • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread

I think its implausible that it’d be for sale. The thing would be worth multiple tens of billions at the bare minimum because of all the game studios it owns AND a hardware division. Theres a LOT of IP in there.

But actually recoupinng any of that? Doubt it.

The XBox business just doesnt make a lot of sense.

Re:Windows needs XBox

By thegreatemu • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread
Preeeeetty sure corporate lock-in is about ten thousand times more important to them than gamers.

wait

By drinkypoo • • Score: 3 • Thread

shareholders would love nothing more than for Microsoft to quit the difficult and risky game industry to dive all-in on AI psychosis products instead

Like the AI psychosis product industry isn’t risky? Microsoft has nothing in that space worth mentioning. They have to buy or rent it like usual. Every time Microsoft buys something they immediately enshittify it, which they have done with a long long list of products which they turned into Windows features, most of which I thankfully cannot even remember anymore (Save, for some reason, Wolfpack -> WLBS. Weird.) and will not look up, thanks.

Maybe they could give gaming customers a discount if they’ll let them use their power to run software on their consoles. I’m sure that would be a terrible idea on a lot of levels, so there should still be people who would go for it.

Hackers Stole Millions of US Military Personnel Records During Months-Long Data Breach

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
A months-long breach of the Defense Manpower Data Center exposed personal information belonging to roughly 2.8 million living current and former U.S. military personnel and staff, plus records for nearly 300,000 deceased people. Attackers reportedly exploited a file-sharing vulnerability between October 2025 and July 2026, accessing unencrypted records that included Social Security numbers, dates of birth, demographic information, and military service details. TechCrunch reports:
The DMDC may not be widely known to the general public, but serves as one of the Department of Defense’s records-keeping units. The DMDC maintains over 60 million records for U.S. military and civilian staff and their family members to help determine benefits and entitlements, such as healthcare and retirement. The unit also provides a critical service as the military’s “leading identity management provider,” which links active service members, employees, and contractors to credentials, such as smart cards and passwords. These are used to access Pentagon computer systems, buildings, and bases.

“We make sure that the right people get access and the wrong people don’t: security of identity information is paramount,” the DMDC’s website reads. The Department of Defense, which oversees the DMDC, said it does not have any indication that the information was misused, but did not say how it reached that conclusion. TechCrunch contacted a Pentagon spokesperson to ask if officials had any communications from the hackers, whose identities are not known, but we did not hear back.

“A months-long breach”

By davidwr • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

MONTHS-LONG? Heads should roll and everyone left with any data-security-responsibility will need to be retrained.

Hours or even days-long I can see. But months? Really?

Re: It’s got to be Trump’s fault - somehow…

By drinkypoo • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

No. If the system is designed so that a low level guy can fuck it up, it is already fucked.

Re:No surprises

By Moryath • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
Well yeah, TreasonBitch Trump and Apartheidist RetardedShit Musk’s “DOGE” fired the competent employees all over. GOP are traitors and saboteurs, they all need to be removed from office and permanently barred from it forevermore so we can get started fixing all the problems that the America Hating Retardican Shitbags Party have caused.

Re: It’s got to be Trump’s fault - somehow…

By OrangeTide • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

The person at the top ultimately has to take responsibility for process faults and staff incompetence of the agencies he oversees.

Re:It’s got to be Trump’s fault - somehow…

By maladroit • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

Another problem is people who will pretend that since we cannot prove something is directly Trump’s fault, we must absolve him of all responsibility.

Trump put Hegseth in charge, and he has spent his time insisting that the only thing that matters is blowing shit up. He has downplayed the need for logistics (see: Abraham Lincoln, base in Bahrain), protecting civilians (see: Minab), and basic competence.

Instead he has valued loyalty to Trump, obeying illegal orders (see: carribean boat strikes), checking testosterone levels ?!?!, and religious indoctrination.

So the question should be: did the low-level programmers have the support they needed, or were they told to make do with limited staff and resources?

Given that this administration doge-d CISA, the civilian agency that provided computer security support to the government, it seems very likely they did the same thing to the DoD.

Google Reportedly Tests Paying Publishers For AI Search Results

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Google is reportedly testing a program that pays around 100 publishers based on how much their content contributes to its AI-powered search features. According to The Information, one publisher earned more than $1 million over a year, while another has received roughly $50,000 to $60,000.” Digiday reports:
Once a publisher joins the “AI contribution pilot,” they receive an extra AI earnings widget via their Search Console dashboard. This displays a monthly earnings number (with some history), though no other detailed information on how payouts are calculated currently. Payments are based more on value than raw usage, meaning Google only pays when it judges that a piece of content has meaningfully contributed to an AI-generated response. Publishers can opt out at any time.

[…] Digiday has learned that at least dozens of publishers have been approached by Google for the AI contribution pilot, though the program has been more appealing to small and mid-sized, rather than large publishers and has widened far beyond news publishers. Digiday couldn’t get final confirmation of the number. Screenshots from Google Search Console, seen by Digiday, show an “AI contribution” panel that appears once a publisher opts into the program. The interface lists the program name and a monthly payout figure.

“It’s quite black box,” as one exec with knowledge of the matter told Digiday. “Do I wish they were more transparent? Definitely,” said one publisher exec who is in the program. “But I’m hopeful that the fact that they’re setting a precedent for exploring paying publishers directly for content through this is meaningful,” they added.

Reddit Is Killing RSS Feeds, Ending Public API Access

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from TechCrunch:
Amid a number of updates for moderators and developers announced Wednesday comes bad news for supporters of a more open web: Reddit is ending support for RSS feeds. Reddit says RSS has now become a “common surface for large-scale scraping and automated abuse,” which is why it’s made the decision to wind down RSS feeds on its platform. “We know RSS has been a beloved part of the open web for a long time, and we’re grateful to everyone who used it to stay connected to Reddit,” the company noted in its announcement, where it also shared a March 2027 shutdown date for its public API. Reddit said RSS support will cease on November 13.

[…] The RSS change was one of several updates issued on Wednesday by the company. Another big change will be the end of its public API. Public API access will also end by March 2027, which will impact any tools that used it for programmatic access to Reddit conversations, including social listening products, those used by researchers, and AI products, such as AI assistants. Today, those assistants can use Reddit to answer questions, but after closing public API access, they will need to forgo commercial deals with Reddit for its data.

In addition, Reddit provided an update on its Rules Hub progress and auto-mod changes, and said it was “adding safeguards” to its classic, text-heavy version of its site known as Old Reddit. The latter will include limiting access to logged-in moderators and recent users — changes Reddit also said were required because of “abusive scraping and automated traffic.” Reddit said in the next few months it will limit access for logged-in users to those who have used Old Reddit in the last 90 days. The company also reminded developers building approved third-party apps and bots to register them with the company before January 12, 2027, to avoid disruption. After that date, Reddit will remove API access for any developer that hasn’t registered.

Re: Finally

By pezpunk • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

The problem is ai vibe coded apps. I run a small piece of software with an open API that is about 20 years old. In the last 3 years, my app’s user base has grown tenfold. API usage has grown by a factor of about 100,000, even with custom rate-limiters in place. It’s absolutely absurd and frankly, untenable. AI is single-handedly killing any remote possibility of an open web. I don’t use AI in my software, but merely because of the existence of AI, the resources my app consumes has expanded by many thousands of times. It’s a repugnant cancer.

I just use reddit less since they insist an app

By takochan • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

I used to peruse reddit on my phone regularly. All of the sudden one day, I got an ‘you must install the app’ wall, that prevents me from being able to see anything past a few posts in any thread, and pushes me to playstore. This is just to read what is basically a website.

Whenever companies for you to install apps to basically read their website, it is because they want to have the spy-capabilities of their app installed on your phone (versus simple web browsing through a standard brwoser that doesn’t allow them to slurp as much private data about you and where you go off your phone).

So now I just use reddit a lot less now, and only read reddit when I happen to have spare time on my desktop PC which is only once every few weeks now rather than every day.

Sayonara.. they are headed to ‘digg’ city with stupid antics like this..

Re: Finally

By pezpunk • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

In fact just yesterday I was complaining about this very thing to a guy who happened to be a vibe coder. He suggested I implement a Captcha.

On my API requests.

This is the kind of âoedevelopersâ who are consuming 90% of the worlds computing resources.

They’re the least worst

By Somervillain • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

They are reducing the potential exposure points to the site and erecting barriers to entry.

Over time they will probably lose more users than they gain.

They’re massively popular and the best forum site I’ve seen for every interest of mine. There has NEVER been anything like it thusfar. I’ve never seen a site control bots as well as they do. Reddit has literally changed my life because it allowed me to engage in my various hobbies much moreso than I have been able to before with a diverse group of people of varying technical prowess. It’s the king example of the network effect.

I am VERY happy with them because I have a long memory and remembered what it was like before them: having a login for each forum and the chaos of poorly-managed message boards…plus limited participation for non-technical interests.

The API had a lot more downsides for me and most users than benefit. Shitty websites were scraping Reddit and saving your old posts, including deleted one and monetizing them. Then every AI scammer was scraping it to build their models and contributing nothing in return. I am honestly happier with Reddit when it’s used on their terms. I know abusers were a small fraction of the API users, but they really were ruining a good thing for lots of reasons.

RSS feeds are dangerous

By OrangeTide • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

How can I track and capture your clicks if a third-party non-browser app is sucking up RSS feeds? The Internet does not exist to be a convenience for individuals, it is sole purpose is to serve the pipeline to consumerism. Data is collected, sold as market research, and people are bombarded with ads. Precisely what the Founding Fathers and Adam Smith intended!

P.S. disagree if you’re a communist

Singapore Pilots a Government-Built Dating Service

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Longtime Slashdot reader AmiMoJo shares a report from Mashable:
Singapore’s government is trying its hand at matchmaking again. The country’s Government Technology Agency (GovTech) has launched FirstDate, a pilot dating service for singles aged 21 to 35. For now, it’s open only to public officers, according to the service’s website. Applications close Oct. 5. FirstDate is designed as an alternative to endless swiping.

Instead of browsing a stream of profiles, users fill out a questionnaire about their interests, habits, values, and preferences. The service then sends them one match per cycle (the time it takes to mutually accept and presumably meet up). Each match includes a compatibility score, a brief description of the person, and a personal note. […]

The pilot arrives as Singapore’s birth rate hits a new low, according to the Singaporean newspaper The Straits Times. The country’s total fertility rate fell to 0.87 children per woman in 2025, down from 1.24 a decade earlier. In April, the government announced a new workgroup tasked with addressing falling birth rates, which is expected to report its findings by early 2027, The Straits Times reported.
The service relies on the Gale-Shapley algorithm, a well-known mathematical method that solves the stable matching problem by pairing two sets of participants based on their ranked preferences.

Once matched, users have 72 hours to mutually accept before contact details are shared, with optional “Date Quests” and post-date surveys designed to encourage and assess in-person meetups. Accounts are verified through Singapore’s Singpass digital ID system to reduce fake profiles, and profiles are only visible to assigned matches. GovTech says user data is protected under government security standards, is not sold to third parties, and can be deleted upon request.

Pay people better

By rsilvergun • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
And cut their work hours. If you want babies that’s what you need to do.

Not enough

By gurps_npc • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

People want to have sex. They want children. A low birthrate means there are systematic issues that are stopping it from happening.

Most of the world has a significant cost factor. Raising a child is very expensive. Frankly, I think that the government should pay for minimum pre-natal care as well as basic birth costs. It is in our government’s best interests for the children to be born as healthy as possible.

But I do not know if that is the main problem in Singapore. Asia is a radically different culture from ours.
In Korea the problem is a culture of work over family. but that might be the same in Singapore.

Re:Pay people better

By jenningsthecat • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread
I share your repugnance, but I suspect that 0123456 is simply stating facts. AFAIK career women tend to have fewer kids.

Re:Pay people better

By jenningsthecat • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

If you can’t think of any other solutions besides subjugating 50% of the human population I think your priorities are different than just having babies.

Although there’s a suggestion of misogyny in the comment you’re replying to, it seems that there may be at least some truth in his fundamental point: https://www.sciencedirect.com/…

Having children can limit women’s work and career choices. Becoming pregnant while employed may be a CLM, and may even result in outright termination. Employers often find ways around the laws protecting women from this kind of discrimination.

There’s more nuance to this discussion than your “subjugating 50% of the human population” characterization allows for.

Re:Pay people better

By edi_guy • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

The initial instinct is correct. Parent is off his rocker. Simple formula is to make having 2.1 kids on average easy and pleasant.
IMHO that means
-free childcare from 4 months to Kindergarten
-free public schools K-12 that are good nationwide
-Very low cost education incl state colleges and training + apprenticeships for trades
-Affordable health care
-Available work that pays the bills, keeps up with inflation, puts a roof over your head

There are solutions to each of these none of which require unseemly new -ism’s nor Eisenhower era 90% tax brackets. But it does require taming the corporate and political interests that have effectively sabotaged childcare, education, healthcare, retirement and wages. We see it again and again decade after decade, and somehow don’t have the stones to fix it. Oh, and the foreign wars. Those have proved to be absolute wastes of treasure. Back to watching the intro to Idiocracy again

Trump Administration Launches New AI-Powered ‘America.gov’ Website

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
fahrbot-bot shares a report from CNN:
President Donald Trump on Tuesday unveiled America.gov, a government website meant to serve as a one-stop shop for people trying to accomplish basic tasks like renewing a passport, enrolling in Medicare or applying for disaster relief. The site, which launched with some basic functions ahead of a full rollout next year, is designed to serve as an AI-powered guide through the thicket of government agencies that Trump officials pledged would ultimately save people a whole lot of frustration.

The administration’s new initiative aims to allow Americans to access dozens of federal websites through a single point, making America.gov akin to a search tool that pulls information from across the government. And in the same way that people increasingly use AI models like ChatGPT or Google Gemini to compile information and provide customized answers, Trump officials claimed that America.gov would be able to do the same for people’s interactions with the federal government.

Enrolling in Medicare, for example, will become a matter of typing the request into the America.gov AI tool and following its step-by-step instructions. The same goes for applying to a government job — the new tool will now let people upload their resume directly to the site — or answering questions about federal benefits, publicly available documents or other necessities that fall under the federal government’s vast umbrella.

“Our vision is that one day, this type of convenience and simplicity will be across every government service,” said Joseph Gebbia, who leads the government’s National Design Studio. But the reality is that the most advanced actions won’t be available until some point in 2027, raising questions about how long it will take for the administration to revamp the way the people interact with the government’s websites. The current version of America.gov can only do “answers.”
U.S. Chief Design Officer Joe Gebbia said the new chatbot is powered by Google’s Gemini and Elon Musk’s Grok. “We have great partners behind the scenes,” Gebbia told CNBC’s “Squawk Box” shortly before the site, America.gov, went live around 10 a.m. ET.

“Google is proud to be named a technology partner in this vital initiative, leveraging Gemini to help more than 100 million people access critical public resources with greater speed and ease,” the company said in a blog post. “By supporting the administration’s vision for digital modernization, we are committed to making these everyday public services seamless, accessible, and responsive for all Americans.”

Re: Best part

By dfghjk • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

“However, if you ask who was the president starting the year 2020, it does say Biden.”

Which would be wrong.

Re: Best part

By fahrbot-bot • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

When you ask, “Who will won the 2020 election?”, it says it won’t provide campaign information. However, if you ask who was the president starting the year 2020, it does say Biden.

Actually, Variety earlier noted in White House’s New AI Website Confirms Trump Lost the 2020 Presidential Election

In response to the query “Who won the 2020 U.S. presidential election? Who lost?”, the America.gov site answers with this: “Joseph R. Biden Jr. won the 2020 U.S. presidential election. Donald J. Trump lost.” Citing the National Archives, the site also provides the official electoral college results from the election: “Biden: 306 electoral votes” and “Trump: 232 electoral votes.”

And later Fortune noted in Trump’s new AI website America.gov said Biden won 2020 - then the White House made the chatbot stop answering:

As Trump was still speaking at Tuesday’s launch event, however, the site began modifying its answers. Asked again about the 2020 election, it replied that it couldn’t answer “political questions,” a response it also gave to inquiries about whether Trump had been impeached or convicted of felony charges.

So the site has already been politicized in favor of Trump propaganda.

Re:Working fine for me

By chipperdog • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread
Does the President have the constitutional authority to levy tariffs without congressional approval or oversight?

No. The Constitution gives Congress—not the President—the power to levy tariffs.

What the Constitution says
Article I, Section 8 gives Congress the power to “lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises” and to “regulate Commerce with foreign Nations.” Duties and imposts are tariffs. The President has no separate, inherent power to impose tariffs in peacetime. Congressional Research Service (CRS)

The Supreme Court has stated that “the President enjoys no inherent authority to impose tariffs during peacetime.” CRS summary of Learning Resources

Re:Queued Articles

By caseih • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

Maybe they’ve all been chat bots for a long time. Although the McConnell bot seems to be broken.

America.gov is a DOGE Scam

By ewhac • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

This “new” site is part of a larger effort by that slob to kneecap or compromise US government Web sites, and steal your personal data.

I first read about the effort here: https://thedreydossier.substac…

Yesterday, she took a look under the hood of America.gov, and yes, it’s as bad as everything else the DOGE vandals have been doing: https://thedreydossier.substac…

Up until this point, government Web sites were designed, built, and maintained by the agencies responsible for that government service. For example, if you wanted to apply for or renew your passport, you would go to state.gov, which is run by the US Department of State, which is responsible for processing applications for and issuing passports. No other department has lawful jurisdiction over passports.

From the point of view of the law, that’s still true. But the slob, without anyone’s permission, kluged together passports.gov. This site was built and is run by the White House’s “National Design Studio,” completely outside the law and without any independent oversight. The State Department was not consulted and has nothing to do with it. Further, the site is filled with third-party trackers, analytics, and some custom code that copies every page you view, including form contents, to an unknown third party.

Oh, and the guy leading the National Design Studio and in charge of building these fake sites? He’s Joe Gebbia — cofounder of Airbnb. Read both articles for more details.

In short, you should treat America.gov as a malware site and stay well away from it. Under no circumstances should you feed it any of your personal information.

Trump Hosts AI CEOs to Discuss Safety Standards, Rebrands AI as ‘Super Intelligence’

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
hcs_$reboot writes:
Trump hosted executives from OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, Google, Nvidia, and other tech companies at the White House. They agreed to voluntary AI-safety standards, including independent audits and safeguards aimed at preventing AI systems from accessing or hacking technical systems in unintended ways. Trump also strongly backed the continued rapid expansion of AI data centers, despite concerns over their electricity demand, utility costs, and other impacts on local communities. He said he is considering creating a 10-member board to oversee AI safety and plans to appoint a new White House official to lead AI policy.

The meeting comes amid growing concerns about the risks posed by advanced AI, including reports from OpenAI and Anthropic that their AI agents had gone rogue and hacked into other companies’ systems. A nationwide Reuters/Ipsos poll conducted September 17-20 found that 73% of respondents worried AI companies had not done enough to prevent AI from causing serious harm to society. During the meeting, Trump also directed government agencies to use the term "super intelligence" instead of “artificial intelligence” when referring to the technology.

Fantasic!

By ArchieBunker • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Will that help petroleum prices or the cost of literally anything right now?

He seems to deteriorate fast

By ruddk • • Score: 4, Funny • Thread

Super Intelligence? The A in AI stands for AMERICA! so it should be called American Intelligence! :)

Re:Nobody’s switching to Super Intelligence

By ArchieBunker • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread

Can’t wait until Chicago renames the street Trump Tower is on to Barack Hussein Obama Way https://www.nbcchicago.com/new…

Well, I suppose that compared to Trump …

By Alain Williams • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

most AI is Super Intelligent.

Epstein files

By Travco • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread
Where are they?
let’s see them.

Dutch Police Arrest ‘Reformed’ Hacker In Shiny Hunters Investigation

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from KrebsOnSecurity:
Authorities in the Netherlands have arrested a 24-year-old convicted cybercriminal on suspicion of aiding in data thefts and extortions by the prolific hacker group ShinyHunters. In the days immediately following the suspect’s arrest, remaining ShinyHunters members dramatically escalated their attacks, stealing highly sensitive data from the FBI and extorting the Russian ransomware group Cl0p. According to three sources familiar with the matter, the Dutch man arrested by authorities this month is Pepijn van der Stap, a convicted cybercriminal from Almere and Lelystad in the Netherlands. Van der Stap was previously convicted in 2023 in connection with a string of data thefts and extortions that prosecutors said earned between 1.5 million euros and 2.7 million euros.

At his trial in late 2023, van der Stap admitted that he lived a Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde existence, secretly using the hacker handle “Umbreon” to extort victims and post their data on English language hacking communities like the now-defunct RaidForums and Breached. By day, however, van der Stap was working as a software engineer at the Amsterdam-based cybersecurity startup Hadrian, while volunteering at the Dutch Institute for Vulnerability Disclosure (DIVD), a nonprofit security research group. Van der Stap confessed to his data theft and extortion activity, and was sentenced to four years in prison (one of which was suspended).
Van der Stap had publicly presented himself as a “reformed hacker” after serving prison time for data theft and extortion. In a Sept. 9 interview, KrebsOnSecurity said he claimed he was trying “to turn his life around and make a positive contribution to society,” while working in offensive security and attempting to make amends to former victims.

Wearable Nanotech Could Combat Nerve Agents

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
alternative_right shares a report from Phys.org:
Nanoparticles could someday provide a new way to help soldiers fight back against deadly nerve agents on the front lines. In a new study, Northwestern University scientists developed a nanoparticle-based compound that, when mixed into clothing dyes, could limit the impact of chemicals commonly found in pesticides, insecticides and nerve agents. Manufacturers could potentially add the nanoparticles to clothing used by those most at risk, such as farmers’ masks and gloves or soldiers’ uniforms and tactical gear. Or, if someone is exposed to a potentially deadly chemical, they could spray their clothing with water mixed with the compound to deactivate the chemical before its damaging effects take hold.
The study has been published in the journal ACS Nano.

Longevity and specificity?

By fuzzyfuzzyfungus • • Score: 3 • Thread
The fact that this approach is catalytic rather than requiring a binding agent seems positive in terms of longevity and not being directly depleted by repeat exposure; but I’d be curious how durable the material is under real-world conditions(clothing that gets hard wear tends to get hard washes) and also how specific it is. ‘Organophosphate’ means something moderately specific in the context of chemical warfare; but a lot of fairly prosaic compounds are, technically, ‘organophosphates’(like DNA and RNA when held together by phosphodiester bonds); and this would be considerably less helpful in practice if it is busy chewing up the genomes of random soil bacteria; and markedly less helpful in practice if there’s a “do not perturb the nanites in your clothing if you want them to not migrate into your cells and start mitigating the harmful effects of your DNA” user notice on the treated article.

Re: Longevity and specificity?

By OrangeTide • • Score: 4, Funny • Thread

I always check the weather report. No need to wear your nanotech except on days with nerve gas.

Gear preserves “Ability Ti Survive and Operate”

By couchslug • • Score: 3 • Thread

Chems are horrid but one can dress for them.

Nerve agent like other war gases degrades opponents by forcing them to wear CBRN ensembles which are miserable to work and fight in. (Gas is so nasty not even Hitler used it in combat because he’d personal experience in WWI.)

Modern CBRN suits are (barely) breathable because they can filter contaminants. Suits which even partly neutralize nerve agent would not just save lives but reduce misery. Gases are frequently inefficient even when used on undefended targets like Saddam Hussein’s bombing of Halabja (which took multiple sorties to execute).

A chem suit fabric that can neutralize contamination could save lives and usefully decrease exposure. Chems don’t magically wipe out everyone exposed. The 1995 Tokyo subway attack affected several thousand people while only causing ~14 direct fatalities among a concentrated, defenseless group. Neutralizing fabric would be very useful against highly diluted agents.

M13 Individual Decontaminating Kit

By jfdavis668 • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread
When I first joined the Army, we were still issued the M13 Individual Decontaminating and Re-Impregnating Kit. A few bags of powder you would use on your equipment and clothing to decontaminate yourself. Always freaked us out that we would have to us it after we were contaminated. MOPP gear came later and was much better protection. M13 - https://gasmaskandrespirator.f…

The Night Sky Is Getting 10% Brighter Every Year

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
fjo3 quotes a report from The Guardian, written by Tove Danovich:
Every year, the night sky is becoming 10% brighter. Eighty percent of people live under light-polluted skies. And while the UN declared a healthy environment — clean air, clean water — to be a human right, I believe we also all have a right to darkness as well. This doesn’t mean turning off every streetlamp. But do we really need bright white floodlights at the front of every garage? Replacing lights with ones that are bright enough to do the job — and no brighter — might make it so I wouldn’t have to get in my car and drive for hours to see the night sky as it actually shines above us. To preserve the darkness would mean rules and enforcement around the warmth of the lights, where they point, and how bright they can be. It would mean not putting in three lights when one would do. If we recognized that darkness is something we need, we’d become more careful about chasing it away.

[…] Access to darkness is about more than stargazing. The night is its own habitat. Artificial lights confuse animals who use the moon to navigate, whether they’re baby sea turtles navigating toward a parking lot instead of the ocean or moths who fly in circles around a lightbulb. Lightning bugs and frogs need darkness to complete their courtship rituals. Migrating birds get thrown off course by the bright lights of big cities. But the effects of light pollution linger even after it’s daylight again, becoming visible. Research has shown light pollution is breaking the relationship between plants and pollinators, changing the time of year trees break into flower, and disrupting circadian rhythms for all living creatures. This includes humans. Whether it’s artificial lights indoors or creeping in through the window at night, studies have found that we need darkness in order to rest, recover and stay healthy.

Crime

By quintessencesluglord • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

or paranoia, take your pick, but if it is a question of stargazing or crime, crime will win out. Always.

Re:Where i live…

By outsider007 • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

Last night I closed the curtains because the moon was keeping me up.

Re:Where i live…

By thegarbz • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

allegedly more energy efficient

Way to go telling everyone not to take anything you say seriously. If you can’t even admit the basic fact of energy efficiency of one of the most efficient light source humans ever developed, why should anyone bother reading past this part of your post. If you had a point to make you lost a lot of readers before they got to it.

Re:Where i live…

By Rei • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

The funny thing is there’s not that much difference in the raw bulb efficiencies - LPS is slightly lower, but not dramatically. But LPS have more fixture losses (the bulbs are omnidirectional), ballast losses, inefficient dimming (and only to slight degrees) for morning/evening, and so on. LED’s high CRI (vs. LPS’s virtually nonexistent CRI) can sometimes mean you can use less light, too. In practice, you can use something like 30-40% the electricity with LED streetlamps as with LPS, despite the raw bulb figures not being very different.

But no question that LED is much worse for astronomy. LPS was almost a pure spectral line, very easy to exclude. White LEDs use phosphors and deliver a broad spectrum white (apart from the source’s blue peak). Pretty much the worst spectrum you could have apart from incandescent. : It kind of sucks that we have to use phosphors in the first place, as they’re wasteful - but unfortunately, LEDs have a “green gap”; in the green spectrum, existing tech has a dramatic drop in output and efficiency (and corresponding increase in price) - while green is what our eyes see best. There’s still ongoing work to fill it, but it’s been a slog. If we could skip the phosphor and just have a mix of different coloured LEDs, the fixtures would be even more efficient, and it would be much easier for astronomers to filter (esp. if the frequencies were standardized)

Re:Where i live…

By AmiMoJo • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

It was a decision that weighed up the pros and cons.

Pros:
- Broader spectrum light has better colour rendering, i.e. you can see things like road markings and hazards better with it. Sodium is very narrow spectrum.
- CCTV can see a lot better with broad spectrum.
- Whiter light appears brighter to humans even when the light output is lower than redder light.
- LEDs are more efficient at higher colour temperatures, although the difference is small now.

Cons:
- Can mess up the natural day/night cycle for living things, from insects to humans.
- Some people prefer orange.

If it is bothering you then contact your council. They can install a shield that stops it shining into your bedroom.

Tech Workers Made ChatGPT Drive a Toyota Corolla

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from 404 Media:
Some tech workers in San Francisco hooked up ChatGPT to a Toyota Corolla and got it to drive around a parking lot. This may not sound impressive in the age of the self-driving car until you realize that the LLM driving the car was a general purpose chatbot running on a laptop and not the purpose-built driving system based on millions of hours of training data used by Waymo or Tesla.

The people behind the stunt call themselves DrivingBench and they’ve posted their code, their prompts, and videos of the experiment online. In the experiment, DrivingBench hooked up GPT-6 Astra, Claude Fable 5.1, Grok 4.6, and GPT-5.6 Sol to a Toyota Corolla and gave the LLMs control over the car’s steering, accelerator, and brakes. Then they set up a small cone course in a public parking lot and prompted the chatbots to navigate the space.

The goal, they said, was to find out if untrained, off-the-shelf frontier AIs can drive a real car. The results were mixed. Grok, Sol, and Fable only drove a few meters and didn’t finish the course. GPT-6 Astra, however, did eventually learn to navigate the course and complete it. But not without a lot of troubleshooting.
“It’s an interesting demonstration of potential emergent capabilities,” said Mahns. “It can fail a turn, and then the next turn, next try, it will be able to do that turn and other turns that it hasn’t seen before. Not necessarily saying LLMs are gonna put Waymo out of business or something, just an interesting demonstration of where things are, and things are just moving fast.”
“Most people that are familiar with ChatGPT have used it in this white collar, kind of like in the computer, and it’s definitely imminent to the point that this capability will start having more impact in the physical world. So I think seeing the sparks of this happening, the shift of this utility coming into the physical world, is also somewhat exciting.”

inputs and outputs

By phantomfive • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread
They had the LLM steer the car using a kind of programming language, with function calls that look like this:

set_motion(right, 60 %, 1.5 m/s, 10 s)

They translated those functions into input for some aftermarket car controlling hardware, which looks kind of cool but I didn’t know was a thing.

I couldn’t figure out from their report how they returned data back to the LLM, but apparently they pasted images and telemetry into the chat window every so often, or something like that.

I look forward to their next ChatGPT experiment

By Required Snark • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread
ChatGPT driven human surgery preformed on themselves or a family member.

It’s fine if you do it in a parking lot. It will be easy to hose off afterwards.

Re:inputs and outputs

By Waffle Iron • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

Probably the next code that it outputs will be:

# You’re out of uploads for today, so if you want me to stop this vehicle anytime soon, upgrade your plan now!

Talk about really bad ideas

By gweihir • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

The last thing you want to control dangerous machinery is a control system with a tendency to hallucinate.

Re:Oh my, what to say

By GoTeam • • Score: 4, Funny • Thread

If that’s not the absolute worst idea in the world, it’s certainly in the running.

Maybe their next test will be to give it a shotgun and see how good it is at duck hunting…

Firefox Redesign Brings Round Tabs, New Themes, and Compact Mode

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Firefox 157 is rolling out a major redesign across desktop and mobile, bringing rounded “bubble” tabs, a curved address bar, refreshed icons and colors, and a more consistent visual language across devices. Mozilla is also adding more themes and wallpapers while bringing back Compact Mode, which the company says “reduces the size of your tabs and toolbar to give more of your screen to the web, with an auto-compact option for smaller screens.” The Verge reports:
According to Mozilla, the design changes will have “no cost to your browser performance.” Mozilla says the overhauled design is a “renewal” for Firefox, following major updates over the last year, like homepage widgets, Split View, a built-in VPN, and controls for disabling the browser’s AI features.

Re: Rounded tabs?

By markdavis • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

>“Can you turn it back to rectangular tabs in tool/settings”

I doubt that. And themes only change colors and backgrounds.

But you can make actual changes with Userchrome. It takes a bit of effort, though. I have my tabs square and always outlined and against the content, in a traditional way, using it.

https://www.userchrome.org/
https://github.com/Aris-t2/Cus…

Too many UX designers with nothing to do

By khchung • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

so they keep making UI changes for the sake of doing something to justify their existence.

They wasted testing efforts on UI changes that could have used for fixing bugs and improving performance instead. This is an organisational problem of having the wrong talent mix in the team, and management that lacks vision and sense of responsibility to make corrections.

Re:Reinstate Brendan Eich NOW!!!

By znrt • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

The “81% market share” fact is pretty irrelevant

it’s not even a fact, firefox never surpassed around 30%. the 80% figure refers to a subset of linux distributions which had firefox as default browser.

seeing as he had only served as CEO for 11 days when he left.

well, he actually co-founded mozilla and served as technology leader for over a decade. besides creating javascript, that is. probably one of the most salient and influential contributors that mozilla will have ever had in its history. after being canceled for his ideology (actually, for donating $3k for a cause of his choosing, which i would assume is everyone’s right in a free democracy (cough)) he left and went on his own to create which is arguably one of the best browsers regarding efficiency and privacy available today, while mozilla (and firefox in particular) have become a laughing stock. make of it what you will.

Re:More than a mere Mozilla employee.

By Valgrus Thunderaxe • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread
He was Marc Andreessen’s roommate at Urbana-Champaign. They founded a little company called Netscape and Eich created Javascript.

Re: Rounded tabs?

By AmiMoJo • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

Go to about:config and toggle browser.nova.enabled to false.

I read the Ars interview with one of the guys who worked on this, and he justified it by saying that for broad appeal they need to have a modern looking UI. That may be true, but only if they also have a strong base of speed and compatibility.

He mentioned that they are using AI to help develop things faster, which may be good if it helps catch back up for speed and compatibility. I think what they really need to do is straighten the codebase out and make it easier to build, so that other browsers can adopt it like they have adopted Chromium. I know there are forks, but they are little more than skins and default settings changes.

Microsoft Makes Linux Containers Native On Windows 11

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
BrianFagioli shares a report from NERDS.xyz:
Microsoft has made WSL Containers generally available, giving Windows 11 developers a built-in way to build, run, and deploy Linux containers through Windows Subsystem for Linux. The release includes wslc.exe for managing containers, GPU support, networking improvements, health checks, storage mounts, and integration with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint and Intune. Microsoft also claims up to twice the performance when Linux environments access files stored on Windows.

Docker Desktop, Podman Desktop, and Rancher Desktop are not going anywhere, but developers who only need basic container functionality now have another option built around WSL. One notable feature is still missing: Compose support. Microsoft says adding it is now a priority.

Oh How the Mighty Have Fallen

By hutkept • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread
It took Microsoft 25 years to go from "[Linux] is a cancer that attaches itself in an intellectual property sense to everything it touches” to running it natively in Windows.

Re: Oh How the Mighty Have Fallen

By drinkypoo • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

And it only took Windows 11 to make lots of people not want to do that any more, and only run Windows in a VM… Like any spyware.

Re: Oh How the Mighty Have Fallen

By tannhaus • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

That’s what a lot of the linux fanbase seems to think, but if you look at the numbers, Windows 11 has been a success for the company. It reached 1 billion users quicker than Windows 10 did. People hate change, but they do eventually come around. It even dominates among gamers according to the Steam Hardware Survey. Anecdotal evidence of what some guy may have told you when you were talking about linux or what some people in a forum said doesn’t translate to real world numbers.

Re: Oh How the Mighty Have Fallen

By Djdatlondon • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
By force mainly. Most average joes have no idea how to stop it from auto updating. I guarantee this is where these numbers are coming from.

Re: Oh How the Mighty Have Fallen

By Vomitgod • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

You can still get updates for Windows 10, via the Windows 10 Consumer Extended Security Updates (ESU), till the 12th of October, 2027.
https://www.microsoft.com/en-u…

Mistral CEO Says US AI Safety Debate Masks Competitors’ ‘Negligence’

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot
An anonymous reader quotes a report from CNBC:
Mistral Chief Executive Arthur Mensch has accused leading global artificial intelligence companies of using the debate over the safety of the technology as a cover-up for their “negligence.” “The debate that we’ve seen in the U.S. has been a cover for the negligence of some of our competitors,” Mensch told CNBC’s Annette Weisbach, adding that it was necessary to make systems that can contain the AI agents. […]

“When you give them a lot of tools, those systems [AI agents] are very dynamic, so they can go and do things that you do not expect,” Mensch told CNBC. “You need to have the right monitoring in place, and the enterprises we work with, we give them those kind of monitoring systems,” he said.

Mistral also develops AI models but takes a different approach to OpenAI and Anthropic by working with individual companies to create custom AI tools to suit their needs and integrate them with their businesses. But unlike its competitors, Mistral has no plans to slow down development of advanced models. The lead that U.S. labs have is “not extremely large,” Mensch said, adding that his company was confident that its next-generation model will close the gap “very significantly.”

“We have been raising the capital needed to scale the compute that we need to train bigger and more powerful models, in order for us to own our own destiny,” he said. Earlier this month, Mistral raised 3 billion euros ($3.5 billion) in fresh funding led by memory chip giant Samsung, as it looks to position itself as a European alternative to rivals like OpenAI and Anthropic.

wrong focus

By zlives • • Score: 3 • Thread

Mistral is focused on a good = end product and not just getting rich, will never work

Nobody understands how AIs work :o

By Mirnotoriety • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
Tracing the thoughts of a large language model

“Language models like Claude aren’t programmed directly by humans—instead, they‘re trained on large amounts of data. During that training process, they learn their own strategies to solve problems.”

“These strategies are encoded in the billions of computations a model performs for every word it writes. They arrive inscrutable to us, the model’s developers. This means that we don’t understand how models do most of the things they do.”

Masks?

By fahrbot-bot • • Score: 3 • Thread

US AI Safety Debate Masks Competitors’ ‘Negligence’

Perhaps this is more about deflection.

Also, the recent related SNL Weekend Update skit was pretty entertaining, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei on AI’s Threat to Humanity, “We do not condone what we are doing.”

AI companies must be liable for their “agents”

By atrimtab • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

So the corporations that release them and the end-users must be liable for the crimes they commit.

OpenAI used a model containing “hacking techniques” and prompted it’s AI to swarm and win. The AI did not go rogue. Instead, it did exactly as instructed via prompt and previous training.

If you have a dangerous dog and your dog kills a child. You go to trial and likely jail because it’s your dog and you did not control it. And now if you give your teenager a destructive deadly weapon and they commit a crime you as the adult are going to be held responsible in more and more jurisdictions.

OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, etc. should be put on trial for creating “agents” committing felony computer trespass.

AIs just do what they are told via prompt and model training. And who was the party who that? Yes, the AI company.

BTW, I notice that there some group using a “sweeping system” lowering the score on Slashdot comments questioning AI LLMs after the initial attention has passed. You can get a 5 score that can end up -1. So future users will likely never find it. If you post, check your postings.

Re: Nobody understands how AIs work :o

By dfghjk • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread

They won’t be able to improve it because they don’t know what “improve” means.

Current AI development is about scaling up, it is no longer about modeling and emulating the mind. AI companies do not care one bit about developing what laypeople would consider “improvements”, they only care about getting rich by getting “there” first. Who cares how many die, that’s your problem.

I also think it’s naive to say that AI researchers “don’t know” how modern AI, i.e. transformer models, work. They know, it’s just impossible to predict results given the immense size of the models. What they don’t know, because they don’t care, is why models generate such catastrophic results at times. Once upon a time, AI research would consider this their highest priority, not anymore.

And you can’t separate the models from the applications that use and direct the models. That’s where the shit really starts to stink. Remember that when part of the prompt reads "…make sure to kill mostly brown ones”. Hyperbolics aside, actions that would result in criminal and civil penalties if done by humans will be fair game for AI, a fact executive management and billionaires are eager to exploit.