Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. EMACS Turns 50
  2. FCC Approves Amazon Leo’s $11.5 Billion Acquisition of Globalstar
  3. Google Begins Certifying Registered App Stores For Android
  4. Astronomers May Have Just Discovered Our Solar System’s Sixth Dwarf Planet
  5. CDC Warns of Rising Threat of Drug-Resistant Germs
  6. Greenhouse Gas Levels Set Records In 2025, UN Says
  7. Ford’s Most Affordable EV Will Offer Built-In Bidirectional Home Charging
  8. Growing List of Firms Object to OKX-ICE Tokenized Stock Plans
  9. Code-Execution Flaw In UEFI Firmware Threatens Most Servers On Planet Earth
  10. Google’s Genie 4 World Model Adds Audio, More Realistic Worlds
  11. Anduril Partners With Qualcomm to Build Laptops On US Soil
  12. Apple’s Foldable iPhone Duo Draws Early Complaints of the Screen Cracking
  13. Cybersecurity CEO Indicted For Allegedly Scamming Millions From Ransomware Victims
  14. Apple Updates MacBook Pro With M6 Chips
  15. In China, the AI Bubble Has Already Burst

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

EMACS Turns 50

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
"EMACS, the mother of all editors, turns 50!" writes Slashdot reader dr_jerry, sharing a report from MIT Technology Review:
Programming used to be a very different experience from the one we know today. In fact, the first programmers didn’t write code at all; the six women who worked on the ENIAC, one of the world’s first computers, at the University of Pennsylvania in 1946 did it by physically configuring switches, cables, and plugboards.

A few years later, MIT engineers programmed the Whirlwind by punching code onto paper tape that was then loaded into the computer’s memory — making it among the first “stored-program” machines. Later, they and others moved on to punch cards, one for each line of code.

By the early 1960s, programmers with interactive computers could use a “line editor” to type their code on teletypes — large, noisy keyboard-and-printer machines. They’d type one line of code at a time, and their work would be saved on a spinning hard disk the size of a modern washing machine. But there was still no such thing as the now-familiar full-screen text editors that allow programmers to see and modify many lines at a time on a display.

One of the first such tools, EMACS, turns 50 this year, and it is still widely used. EMACS first ran on the early video terminals at the MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory in 1976, but its core concepts were so powerful that it was rewritten for many operating systems in the decades that followed. Apple even distributed it with Mac OS X. Beyond that, the software-sharing community that started around EMACS helped give rise to the modern-day free software movement and the GNU/Linux operating system.

vi is the best editor

By backslashdot • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

I don’t mean to spoil emacs big day and all, and I’ll let you guys talk about it .. but vi is the best editor. emacs couldn’t anticipate the coming of AI .. pretty much a settled debate now that vi is much more suited for prompt writing and editing your .md files.
ctrl-x y
dammit
z w
y
wx
:

50 is fitting

By Tarlus • • Score: 4, Funny • Thread

Coincidentally, nobody over the age of 50 has the finger dexterity to operate it.

FCC Approves Amazon Leo’s $11.5 Billion Acquisition of Globalstar

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
The FCC has approved (PDF) Amazon Leo’s $11.5 billion acquisition of satellite operator Globalstar, giving the Starlink rival additional infrastructure and spectrum to expand into direct-to-device satellite connectivity. Engadget reports:
You may not know Globalstar but have possibly used its services, as the company provides Apple’s emergency satellite connectivity for compatible iPhones and Watches. Interestingly, Apple also held a 20 percent stake in Globalstar prior to its takeover. As part of the deal, Leo will power satellite services for supported iPhone and Apple Watch models.

Leo, a rival to SpaceX’s Starlink, has been active of late. The company recently announced that it has 400 satellites in orbit and revealed last month that it had launched high-quality satellite internet service in Uzbekistan. It’s teaming up with Delta to eventually bring satellite internet to flights, as well. Amazon recently added six new Arianespace launches and aims to have more than 3,000 low-earth orbit satellites up in the near future, still well short of SpaceX’s 11,000 satellites.

Google Begins Certifying Registered App Stores For Android

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica:
Running an app ecosystem has gotten a lot more complex for Google after its loss in the Epic Games antitrust case. While U.S. users can access app stores in Google Play by court order, international users will use Google’s voluntary Registered App Stores program. Google has announced that stores wishing to be part of that program are now free to apply, and support will roll out to some Android devices later this year. App stores accepted into the program will enjoy preferential treatment on the Android platform. Users of approved stores will be able to install apps with a single click, similar to the experience in the Play Store. These stores will also be allowed to update apps silently in the background like Google’s store does.

[…] Registered App Stores are still happening on Android, but they won’t be supported in the U.S. — you can go to Google Play for alternative stores stateside, but so far, Aptoide remains the only one listed. Those operating Android app storefronts who want to be included in the international program can now review the program and begin the enrollment process. Any store hoping to get approval will have to adhere to a number of requirements, including protecting intellectual property, removing illegal content, and publishing a privacy policy for both users and developers. Google also requires several ongoing security measures to ensure the stores do not give malware easier access to Android devices. As part of the application process, store operators must provide documentation for all these points (in English) and upload copies of all their apps.

It costs $10,000 per year to participate in the Android Registered App Stores program, and that fee must be paid before Google will review the application. Google says this fee covers the additional support necessary to run the program. There may also be additional review fees if Google detects a store has a problem with malware. Google plans to roll out support in dozens of nations, which includes most of the world outside of the U.S. and Europe. The program goes live on December 1, but it will only work on Android devices running the latest builds of Android 17. Google says support will start with Android 17 QPR2, which is expected to arrive on Pixel phones in the coming weeks.

10000 a year!

By AcidFnTonic • • Score: 3 • Thread

10k a year fuck right off with that bullshit. These are all roadblocks you idiots put up so removing them costs nothing you sniveling fuckers

This won’t last long

By thegarbz • • Score: 3 • Thread

As much as I hate that fucker Tim Sweeney I’m sure he won’t settle for a US only win, and if he lodges a complaint in Europe the EU will certainly have things to say about Google, a certified gatekeeper under the DMA demanding a $10k participation fee.

I’m not sure which lawyer approved this at Google but I suspect they are counting on making enough profit in a short time to offset the almost certain fine they will get.

Astronomers May Have Just Discovered Our Solar System’s Sixth Dwarf Planet

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Astronomers using the Vera C. Rubin Observatory have discovered 2026 ED138, a large object beyond Neptune that could become the solar system’s sixth recognized dwarf planet if further observations confirm it is massive enough to be round. Located about 46 times farther from the Sun than Earth, the object is estimated to be 600 to 1,500 kilometers wide and had remained hidden because it lies against a particularly crowded field of Milky Way stars. Scientific American reports:
The discovery was made by running billions of pieces of data collected by the Rubin Observatory through a search code developed by Center for Astrophysics | Harvard & Smithsonian astronomers Matthew Holman and Kevin Napier. “My first reaction was one of excited disbelief,” Holman said in a statement. “Objects like this are very rare, so I immediately started checking whether I or the code had done something wrong.”

When Holman and his colleague Mario Juric of the University of Washington went to double-check, they found 30 more observations of the object by Rubin that dated to between March and July 2026. Looking at other observation tools, the pair found even more sightings going back to 2016. Together, these data allowed the astronomers to begin mapping out 2026 ED138’s orbit. The suspected dwarf planet is about 46 times as far from the sun as Earth, making it even more remote than Pluto, which is just 40 times as far. The object is also tilted off the solar system’s plane by around 25 degrees, an arrangement that could be linked to disruptions caused by Neptune’s gravitational pull.

Initial measurements indicate that 2026 ED138 has a diameter between 600 and 1,500 kilometers (373 and 932 miles), which makes it one of the largest dwarf planet candidates yet detected. But size isn’t all that matters: further observations are required to determine if the object has enough mass to be pulled into a round shape, which is a key requirement for a dwarf planet. Despite its size, 2026 ED138 was able to avoid detection for all these years because it’s located in a part of the night sky that’s crowded with stars whose light drowned it out.

Imagine, a planet full of dwarfs

By butt0nm4n • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

I must go there. I could be a giant in the getting things from high shelves industry.

Re:Occultations?

By canavan • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread
No. Even with many stars, the angular size of a dwarf planet is so small that you have to at the right location on earth to see specific occultations when/if they occur. When they do, it may be possible to determine the size and shape by spreading observers accross the path of the occultation and precisely timing the start/end. Stars will be points in any case.

Re: Occultations?

By beelsebob • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

Up until very recently we’ve not really been looking at large areas of the sky repeatedly every night. There were likely thousands of occultations and we just didn’t see them because we weren’t looking at that particular bit of the sky when they happened.

Vera Rubin came online a few months ago, and has precisely that job - to take images of a large portion of the sky with a very wide angle very high resolution camera, and compare them every few nights. The result⦠oh look - there’s a dwarf planet, not just occulting things, but reflecting light.

Re:moon

By Rei • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

Speak for yourself, Pluto is fascinating. Tectonically active. Cryovolcanism so abundant it appears to have formed large mountains by the merger of individual domes. A gigantic scar exposing its mantle, which over time roils in massive convection cells, pockmarked in sublimation pits. Mountains drifting like icebergs and accumulating on the shore. Penetentes (sublimation ice spikes), the size of large hills. A multilayer blue atmosphere, in which organic chemistry occurs, depositing not just organic matter onto its own surface, but that of its moon as well. Active glaciation. A probable subsurface ocean, in contact with rock. Conditions suggesting it was habitable when it formed.

IMHO, it’s way more interesting than a number of recognized planets.

(Also, I’m confused by your response. This isn’t about the moon, and the moon has no atmosphere for flying)

Re:Pluto is a planet

By SlashbotAgent • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

Do you know that The Moon of America is three times larger than Pluto?

CDC Warns of Rising Threat of Drug-Resistant Germs

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
The CDC estimates that 19 drug-resistant pathogens cause 9.7 million infections and more than 50,000 deaths annually in the U.S., with resistance continuing to outpace development of new treatments. “The agency considers this problem to be one of our most urgent public health threats,” reports NBC News. From the report:
The report is the CDC’s first comprehensive assessment of these drug-resistant pathogens in seven years. […] The new report offers a detailed picture of these threats in the U.S., including a ranking of which are the most urgent concerns, based on the number and severity of infections they cause and how easily preventable or transmissible they are. The ranking also factors in how many treatment options exist and their costs. […] The report estimates that 19 drug-resistant germs cause 9.7 million infections annually in the U.S. Of these, four pathogens are ranked as most worrisome, including the fungus Candida auris and the bacteria that causes gonorrhea, which has become resistant to all but one class of antibiotics used to treat it.

The other two urgent threats, according to the CDC, are the bacteria Acinetobacter and Enterobacterales, both of which are resistant to a class of antibiotics widely considered a “last resort” for patients. In addition, the report adds a new bacteria to the list of “concerning” threats, which are considered less worrisome but still warrant monitoring: neisseria meningitidis, which causes meningococcal disease. The rare but life-threatening illness can be prevented through childhood vaccinations, but the bacteria that causes it is slowly developing a resistance to penicillin and another antibiotic called ciprofloxacin.

The report also offers some good news: The CDC determined that the bacteria Clostridioides difficile, or “C. diff,” which causes diarrhea and inflammation of the colon and can be deadly, is causing fewer cases year over year. The agency downgraded it to a serious threat, whereas it was categorized as urgent in the prior version of the report, which came out in 2019.

Defund the CDC

By backslashdot • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

Then we won’t have to deal with being informed about germs.

Re:Do we know the geographical source?

By gtall • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Nonsense, RFK, Jr. (note the R) has claimed Covid spared Ashkenazi Jews and Chinese people. That’s right up there with el Bunko claiming Haitian dogs and cats were eating Ohio children (or whatever that bozo was claiming), and claiming his uncle developed radar (no).

We used to have health care professionals in other countries helping diagnose and treat new diseases. Now, not. el Bunko canceled that, so now we have no prior warnings unless the pandemic spreads. el Bunko is supposed to enable our scientists to combat diseases, yet he’s cutting funding for medical research.

I do not know what fake meat is to you (or anyone else). If you are talking about lab grown meat, then compare conditions of lab grown meat with conditions in a slaughterhouse. And if you want to eat real meat again, do not visit a slaughterhouse because that will certainly put you off your vittles.

Now go back and update your background so that you are not siphoning right-wing nut conspiracies and coming here to spew them. If you are going to continue this, at least cc Fox News, they go for that kind of slop.

Antibiotics in farm use [Re:Do we know the …]

By XXongo • • Score: 4, Informative • Thread

Do we know if these are mainly developing in the USA or elsewhere in the world? The USA actually restricts antibiotics by requiring prescriptions.

Yes… and no.

The USA restricts antibiotics for humans by requiring prescriptions.

Farm animals get fed antibiotics by the truckload, and don’t need prescriptions.
https://www.ewg.org/news-insig…
https://extension.okstate.edu/…
https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/ant…
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/a…

Fix it? [Re:Do we know the geographical source?]

By XXongo • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Everything is Trump’s fault.

Accurate. DT has been reducing the budget and firing workers at the FDA and the CDC, which is to say, the medical professionals charged with stopping disease,.

Democrats will fix it in a few weeks

Unlikely. Even if Democrats win control of the House of Representatives, DT is still the president and hence the chief executive. The Democrats don’t have the power to fix anything, the best they might be able to do is to stop things from getting worse quite as quickly.

Possibly they could get rid of RFK Jr, who seems to be actively trying to destroy medical science in the US, but DT would just find another incompetent to replace him, and if the Senate won’t ratify, he has no problem just keeping an “acting” head forever.

We just need infinity immigrants. That solves everything.

Not sure how you can have “infinity” immigrants, but, yes, we could bring in doctors, nurses, and medical researchers from abroad.

Bacteriophages [Re:Antibiotics are going out.....]

By XXongo • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread

maybe bacteriophage (viruses that target bacteria) are the immerging technology. They are also useful in therapy for certain kinds of cancer.

Yeah, but it costs tens to hundreds of thousands of dollars and weeks of study to do that.

There’s a lot of work being done ( https://www.nature.com/article… ) including designing of genetically engineered bacteriophages ( https://news.stanford.edu/stor… ).

So, stay tuned.

Greenhouse Gas Levels Set Records In 2025, UN Says

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from CBS News:
Greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere rose to record highs in 2025, locking in climate impacts that will persist for centuries, the United Nations said on Tuesday. Levels of the three main greenhouse gases — the climate-warming carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide — all rose to unprecedented figures in 2025, the U.N.‘s weather and climate agency said. The World Meteorological Organization said the rise would lead to more long-term temperature increases for the planet.

The bulletin looks at greenhouse gas concentrations — the amount of those gases in the atmosphere — rather than new annual emissions amounts as the world burns more coal, oil and gas. In 2025, carbon dioxide concentrations were at 426.8 parts per million (ppm); methane at 1,948 parts per billion, and nitrous oxide at 339.1 parts per billion. That takes them, respectively, to 153%, 267% and 126% of the pre-industrial levels witnessed before 1750. Of the three major greenhouse gases, CO2 accounts for about 66% of the warming effect on the climate.

Around half of the total CO2 emitted each year remains in the atmosphere; the rest is absorbed by the land and oceans. From 2024 to 2025, the global average concentration of CO2 rose by 2.8 ppm — smaller than the record surge from 2023 to 2024 of 3.6 ppm. WMO senior scientific officer Oksana Tarasova said this reflected the “recovery of the land carbon sinks and reduced fire carbon emissions in 2025 after the strong 2023/2024 El Nino,” the naturally occurring, climate-warming weather phenomenon. “However, a 2.8 ppm annual increase is still a substantial addition of carbon to the atmosphere from fossil fuel burning.” It is also above the average growth rate for the past decade of 2.6 ppm — a figure that stood at 0.8 ppm in the 1960s.
“Another year, another new record,” said WMO Deputy Secretary-General Ko Barrett. “Greenhouse gases are trapping an unprecedented amount of heat in the atmosphere, providing energy for more extreme weather and associated risks to our economies and societies.
Further reading: UN Says Breaching 1.5C Warming Limit Is ‘Imminent and Unavoidable’

“Yes, we’ll all die horribly-

By locater16 • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
-but I will die much richer than you” - the problem

The only way to fix it is to fix the rewards

By BitterEpic • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

If we don’t fix our economic system to reword behavior that prioritizes people and the environment, I don’t think humanity has a chance. With capitalism we are rushing off the side of a cliff.

Re:Well, AI

By outsider007 • • Score: 4, Informative • Thread

That’s not from Archer, you Millennial.

Re:k, sure

By BadgerStork • • Score: 4, Informative • Thread

ice cores

Re:k, sure

By XXongo • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

Methane was only named in 1866. How did they make their cockenbull measurements of it 100 years before?

Paleoclimate researchers measure ancient methane primarily by analyzing air bubbles trapped in glacial ice cores retrieved by drilling into ice sheets in Antarctica and Greenland.

Ford’s Most Affordable EV Will Offer Built-In Bidirectional Home Charging

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Ford’s upcoming $28,350 Fathom electric truck will include a built-in inverter capable of supplying up to 10 kW of AC power to a home, bringing bidirectional charging to a significantly cheaper EV. Owners will still need additional Ford home hardware for features like outage backup and peak-rate energy management, but the company expects the necessary equipment to cost substantially less than its previous-generation system. CNET reports:
The upcoming Fathom will be based on what Ford calls its Universal EV Platform, designed with the aid of its 2023 acquisition, startup Auto Motive Power, with bidirectional power on the plate from the start. The hardware required to invert the battery’s DC energy to an estimated 10 kW of AC home power will be built into the truck, so it won’t require a separate wall-mounted inverter box. Ford says the Fathom’s system will meet all applicable UL 1741 requirements and IEEE 1547 standards to ensure the vehicle is safely connected to the grid. As for the actual hardware you plug into your car, all signs point to the Fathom using the NACS plug type pioneered by Tesla and now widely adopted by new EVs in North America. In terms of the communication standard — the one that governs how AC power is routed from the slim wall box to the car’s onboard charger — that’ll be via SAE J3068, a software protocol developed for high-power, heavy-duty AC charging.

[…] However, while Fathom’s Universal EV Platform eliminates the need for a wall inverter box, it doesn’t completely bypass the need for additional hardware to make your home ready to accept bidirectional power. Say you wanted to take advantage of the Home Power Management feature to draw energy into the Fathom’s battery when power is cheapest, and then use that energy to offset peak-hour usage when power is most expensive. You’ll have to install at least the Ford Home Power Station in your home, at an additional cost. The automaker hasn’t specified pricing, but says that it’s working to reduce costs and expects this component alone to cost half as much as the first-generation Ford Home Energy system, which debuted at around $1,300. That could put the new system at roughly $650.

Re:Great feature

By thegarbz • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

It’s standard on current gen VW ID models, it’s standard on all BYD models, for some reason Renault only offers V2G and no suitable V2H feature, Audi’s most popular EV supports it (Q4 e-tron), Kia has it on the EV9 with plans for the EV6 to do it too, Hyundai IONIQ 9 has V2H but the 5 and 6 only offer V2L which is better than nothing. Among these there’s a mix of different hardware potentially required in the house, but most of that hardware is dumb with the car inverter doing the heavy lifting.

We’re slowly getting to the point where V2H is more common than not. It’s just really not heavily advertised.

What’s the installed price?

By CustomBuild • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

Getting a second useful job out of the most expensive part of an EV makes sense. If I’m already buying the truck, a reasonably priced way to keep the fridge and lights running is a pretty appealing extra, but the roughly $650 figure needs some context. Ford says outage backup also requires its Home Backup Power Panel. Then there’s installation. Moving the inverter into the truck is a useful saving, but I’d want the complete installed quote before comparing this with other backup options. There’s another detail in Ford’s announcement: peak-rate energy management requires an active plan or trial. What’s that going to cost? A recurring fee belongs in the calculation alongside conversion losses and additional battery cycling. Making the hardware affordable is a good start; the electricity savings still have to survive the subscription bill.

Re:Ford EV?

By 93 Escort Wagon • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread

Reading the tea leaves, it sounded like the market for a full-size electric pickup is comprised of individuals who seemingly suffer from terminal range anxiety. So Ford is rumored to be relaunching the F-150, except on the new universal platform and also as an EREV - it’s supposedly gonna have a generator on board.

I’m actually curious to see the Fathom when it comes out. I don’t really need a full-size pickup, but owning a pickup would come in handy a few times a year (if you have to rent one and drive it more than 20-30 miles, you end up paying through the nose). I was originally thinking about the Lighning, but got a bit spooked by all the crap Trump’s started pulling to attempt killing the EV market outright. Of course he shot himself in the foot with Iran not too long after, which seems to have changed some of these companies’ minds again.

Re:Terrible feature

By CaptQuark • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

You might change your mind two hours into a 20 hour power outage. The ability to temporarily borrow power from an EV to keep your lights, fridge, and furnace running would be a major selling feature for many people.

Re:Terrible feature

By Smidge204 • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Why spend even more money on more equipment that you have to store and maintain, and buy increasingly expensive fuel for, when you can dual purpose what you already have?

That’s assuming you can even get fuel of course. When Sandy hit (last big hurricane in this area) most of the gas stations around here were inoperable for the first day or two because - you’ll never believe this - but fuel pumps ALSO need electricity and there weren’t enough generators rentals to go around. The stations that were operating over the next few days quickly ran out because the depot infrastructure, located on the shoreline, was damaged.

So sure, all you need is a generator, and an entire evening to wait in line for your rationed fuel hoping they don’t run out by the time you get to the pump. So easy and much more convenient than just running an extension cord to the EV in your garage, which also runs silently, indoors, all night if you want.

If you want to go full prepper mode buy some solar panels and lay them out in the driveway or lawn. Even a kw or two worth (about 4-7 panels) would be able to easily cover your daily emergency needs with an EV battery to store it in.
=Smidge=

Growing List of Firms Object to OKX-ICE Tokenized Stock Plans

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Intel, Oracle, IBM and IonQ have joined a growing list of companies objecting to having tokenized versions of their shares traded through OKX and Intercontinental Exchange’s blockchain venture, bringing the total number of objections to 26. About 37% of the companies on OKXICE’s original list have now opted out, according to CoinDesk. From the report:
The four companies were named in an updated public notice (PDF) dated Monday, Oct. 26, from OKXICE, the two firms’ joint venture. They join earlier objectors including Microsoft, Alphabet, Goldman Sachs, Cisco and Wells Fargo. The growing list underscores a hurdle for OKXICE and the SEC’s new framework for tokenized stock trading: building a market that issuers are willing to join. The agency’s five-year “Innovation Exemption” gives qualifying venues room to test round-the-clock blockchain-based trading of stocks, and it also gives public companies an option to block their shares from being offered.

OKXICE issued its initial public notice on Oct. 4, outlining plans to use Uniswap v4 liquidity pools on OKX’s XLayer blockchain, with transactions settled in stablecoins. The venue would use automated market makers — software that executes trades through pools of assets rather than matching buyers and sellers through a conventional order book. Under the framework, venues must notify issuers and give them 30 days to object before offering tokenized versions of their shares.

scammers gonna scam

By awwshit • • Score: 3 • Thread

We are living in the Platinum Age of Scamming.

This is not about crypto

By pla • • Score: 3 • Thread
I can already, completely above-board, sell someone a block of DRS’d IBM shares for crypto if I want to. Let’s all be clear this isn’t about denominating stocks in Bitcoin.

Rather, this is effectively about recording stock transactions on a blockchain. Nothing more and nothing less than swapping a distributed transaction log for a traditional ledger.

The implication is clear, the SEC is at least considering the idea of creating shares as a token cryptocurrency. In this case, the tokens are backed by real shares. That’s not a technical requirement, though, and a future company might someday skip the major exchanges entirely to list only as a token. To be clear, there’s nothing sacred about the exchanges and their “house rules”; there’s nothing inherently wrong with using a blockchain vs a ledger; and to reiterate, this has nothing to do with “buying stocks with Bitcoin”.

On that last point, I consider OKXICE’s decision to accept payment in some nondescript “stablecoins” as extremely unfortunate. Not because I’m a cryptophobe, but because it muddies the waters as to the viability of the core concept of tokenized equity itself - Though that’s a bit of a tautology, given stocks are already “tokenized equity”. Whether we denominate them in USD or BTC or cowrie shells is an entirely separate issue.

Code-Execution Flaw In UEFI Firmware Threatens Most Servers On Planet Earth

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Ars Technica’s Dan Goodin reports:
Defenders across the world face the burden of responding to yet another botched code-execution vulnerability, this time in boot-time firmware used by most of the world’s server vendors and data centers. The vulnerability, with a severity rating of 9.5 out of 10, resides in the TianoCore EDK II, an open source codebase that hardware makers and cloud providers use to create the UEFI firmware that runs during the boot-up sequence. Last year, a representative of the UEFI Forum called (PDF) EDK2 the “preeminent solution / implementation of the UEFI specifications.” Virtually all UEFI suppliers (sometimes still called IBVs or independent BIOS vendors), including AMI, Insyde, and Phoenix, use the reference code extensively. Project Mu, Microsoft’s hardened EDK2 fork, used the code containing the vulnerable component as well.

The vulnerability, tracked as CVE-2026-97631, is a memory-corruption flaw in an ICMP component that attackers can exploit to execute malicious code that runs before the operating system and firmware can implement defenses like Secure Boot, which establishes a chain of trust for all code, including the Trusted Platform Module (TPM), loaded during boot. While final payloads delivered by CVE-2026-97631 have no persistence — meaning they run only once — they can give attackers a wide opening to install other payloads that also run each time early in the boot process.

The parties that discovered CVE-2026-97631 — Alex Matrosov of Anthropic and Dan Holmes of Google — had arranged for it to stay under wraps until a coordinated disclosure that was scheduled for January. AMI, a maker of motherboards and other hardware, published this pull request last month that detailed the vulnerability and included a code fix. Once the post came to the attention of the discovering parties, TianoCore Project members published a public advisory last week. With publicly available patch code, it will be trivial for advanced hackers to learn how the vulnerability is triggered and to build working exploits. Further compounding the urgency, patching UEFI code vulnerabilities in millions of end devices sold and used by thousands of hardware makers and cloud providers is cumbersome and time-consuming.

“On Planet Earth”

By Petersko • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

My apologies for the pedantic reply, but I’m just getting exhausted by the seemingly endless need people have to inject urgency into headlines. “On Planet Earth” is not necessary. At all. You can drop those words and the sentence means exactly the same thing.

What would be useful in the summary is some information on how the attack might happen.

For the record, during the window of a PXE-boot, a malicious unicast ICMP error message can be picked up by the driver and cause a buffer overrun. The window is closed when boot is complete.

https://github.com/tianocore/e…

Re: “On Planet Earth”

By drinkypoo • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Perhaps they read the top of the announcement where it says “While a machine is PXE-booting over IPv4 or IPv6” etc etc.

Re:“On Planet Earth”

By Retired Chemist • • Score: 4, Funny • Thread
Apparently, the aliens in Independence Day did.

Re: “On Planet Earth”

By 93 Escort Wagon • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

Must I remind you about the Slashdot Code of Conduct?

- Reading anything except the summary is against the rules and may result in a lifetime ban.

- Reading the full summary is frowned upon, but allowable. However posters are strongly encouraged to stop reading after the first two sentences.

- Responses which make it obvious the author only read the first half of the submission title should be modded “Insightful” if at all possible.

Re:“On Planet Earth”

By Zero__Kelvin • • Score: 4, Informative • Thread
Network booting is used by most major corporations including Google, Meta, and Amazon. The percentage of physical bare-metal servers using network booting (either traditional PXE or modern variants like iPXE and HTTP Boot) is effectively 100%. While this CVE doesn’t come into play with HTTP Boot it does affect PXE boot and iPXE when PXE is used to chainload iPXE. For more information simply commit the blasphemy of entering “For CVE-2026-97631 do systems need to use network booting, and does it affect just PXE or iPXE and HTTP Boot?” into Gemini, Claude or your most hated AI.

Google’s Genie 4 World Model Adds Audio, More Realistic Worlds

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from TechCrunch:
Google DeepMind released its newest world model, Genie 4, in research preview on Tuesday. The latest model generates the most photorealistic and interactive worlds yet, allowing users to type prompts mid-simulation to change the scene. The model also generates real-time audio that matches the simulated world, including music, ambient noises, and interactive dialogue.

[…] Google released its predecessor, Genie 3, as a research preview a little over a year ago. Aside from being far more photorealistic and featuring audio, Genie 4 allows for freeform edits, like changing the weather or camera angle in real time or adding new people or objects. It can maintain a consistent scene for up to two minutes, double its predecessor’s limit, and offers better physics and more human-like characters. Gemini, Google’s AI model, is also mo
“What we’ll increasingly see in the future are these hybrid world models, where you have a combination of Gemini writing code and text, and Genie ingesting that in real time and simulating reality at different levels of abstraction,” Tejas Kulkarni, research director at Google, said during a briefing.
Genie 4 is now available to select testers, with a broader rollout planned in the coming weeks for Google AI Ultra subscribers.

You can watch a demo of Genie 4 on YouTube.

Have fun storming the castle

By Slashvertisment • • Score: 3 • Thread
This seems both incredibly impressive and ridiculously pointless at the same time. It’s an impressive feat, yet at the same time falls short of anything that’s going to be used above an amateur level. The visuals still don’t quite make sense (vanishing, appearing and changing objects and terrain seems to be a persistent problem, it’s getting better but not there yet, and there are further issues with the world building in that demo) and the audio sounds like it was intentionally designed to disperse people from an area. Given the resources and (real) costs, which yes, will come down, but still, it’s not clear what the intended use is other than “look what we can do.”

Anduril Partners With Qualcomm to Build Laptops On US Soil

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Longtime Slashdot reader fadethepolice writes:
Anduril, arguing that its manufacturing capabilities are directly applicable to laptop manufacturing, is starting a project for a fully 100% U.S.-sourced laptop. The computer will use a Qualcomm Snapdragon SoC. I did not see any information about the OS, but I’m assuming that, given the type of processor, this will be Linux-based?
“Other companies might design their computers in the U.S., Anduril makes them here,â the Anduril founder Palmer Luckey said in a YouTube video. “We’re making parts out of metals that the U.S. knows how to extract, knows how to refine, knows how to process, and knows how to mill at scale at a reasonable price; and that goes for the entire laptop. The same thing goes for the battery technology.”

The project, called BlueChip, “will take a phased approach, beginning with expanding domestic sourcing and manufacturing, progressing toward eliminating reliance on foreign suppliers, and ultimately establishing an end-to-end American supply chain.” The first device is expected in April 2027.

A press release with additional information is available here.

Oh boy.

By fuzzyfuzzyfungus • • Score: 3, Insightful • Thread
This seems like a great pick if you want to be absolutely sure that your computing stays between you, the techbros, republican loyalists in ‘national security’; and possibly an Israeli software partner or two.

At least no chicom lithium stealing your thoughts.

Re:Not What You Hoped For

By ArchieBunker • • Score: 4, Informative • Thread

Palmer Luckey has gifted dear leader and was rewarded. https://www.theguardian.com/us…

Apple’s Foldable iPhone Duo Draws Early Complaints of the Screen Cracking

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Apple has acknowledged an inner-display defect affecting a small number of its new $1,999 iPhone Duo foldables after customers reported hearing a crunch while unfolding the device before cracks, lines and other display failures appeared along the crease. Apple is replacing affected phones and investigating the problem.

iFixit believes a failing hinge component may be pressing into and cracking the display rather than the panel itself being defective. Bloomberg reports:
Reports of the problem first surfaced on Reddit and other social media sites. Bloomberg News has since independently verified the issue with more than half a dozen customers, who provided photos showing damage to their devices or evidence of their support conversations with Apple. Apple acknowledged the issue in a statement, saying it was “aware of an issue impacting the inner display on a small number of iPhone Duo units.”

“If users experience issues with their iPhone Duo display, they should contact AppleCare for a replacement,” the Cupertino, California-based company said. Most Duos aren’t affected by the problem, and the units that are impacted exhibit the defect quickly, Apple said.

An initial crunch…

By TWX • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

…is normally preferred with a good, crisp apple.

Skeptical that this always presents itself quickly

By LodCrappo • • Score: 3 • Thread

“Most Duos aren’t affected by the problem, and the units that are impacted exhibit the defect quickly, Apple said.”

I’m skeptical of this. This video shows the exact same damage occurring after 75,001 opens - https://gizmodo.com/iphone-duo…

BuT APpLE WaiTs UNtIL It’S PeRFeCt!

By thegarbz • • Score: 3, Insightful • Thread

Okay time for the Apple fanbois to find another excuse as to why they are late to the game, clearly their “Apple only launches tech once it is perfected” excuse aged like a bag of prawns in the Australian sun.

Better PR this way.

By fahrbot-bot • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

Apple is replacing affected phones and investigating the problem.

They first tried telling people, “You’re folding it wrong”, but that didn’t go over well. :-)

Cybersecurity CEO Indicted For Allegedly Scamming Millions From Ransomware Victims

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from ProPublica:
A Florida man who was the subject of a 2019 investigation by ProPublica was indicted last month on federal charges that he defrauded clients of his ransomware data recovery firm. According to the Justice Department, the man, Zohar Pinhasi, told customers he could recover their encrypted files without having to pay hackers, when, in reality, he paid the ransom and charged victims a hefty fee on top. The indictment mirrors the findings from ProPublica’s 2019 article "The Trade Secret,” which centered on Pinhasi and his scheme.

The outlet found that the ransomware victims were being harmed twice: once by the hackers, who locked their targets’ files and demanded ransom, and a second time by MonsterCloud, Pinhasi’s Florida-based data recovery firm, which misled its clients about not paying ransoms. “By falsely claiming to decrypt ransomware without paying off the ransomers, the defendant re-victimized his clients while extracting a hefty profit for himself,” U.S. Attorney Joseph Nocella said in an Oct. 7 press release. “Our Office will vigorously prosecute ransomware attackers who prey on Americans from across the world and those who cynically profit from their criminal activity.” […] Pinhasi, who went by the alias Zack Green, told ProPublica in 2019 that MonsterCloud never promised clients that their data will be recovered by any particular method. “How we do it, it’s our problem,” he told ProPublica. “You will get your data back. Sit back, relax and enjoy the ride.” He called MonsterCloud’s data recovery methods a “trade secret.”

[…] Federal investigators found that, over the course of the scheme, Pinhasi allegedly charged clients more than $19 million and paid more than $8 million in ransom payments. In one example, Pinhasi made a ransom payment of about $8,200 but charged the client about $150,000. If convicted, he faces up to 20 years in prison. […] In 2019, Pinhasi touted MonsterCloud’s ties to law enforcement as evidence of its integrity. Pistole, who also headed the Transportation Security Administration under President Barack Obama, was listed on MonsterCloud’s website as the only member of its “Cyber Security Advisory Council.”

Re: Unethical but was it illegal?

By drinkypoo • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

It’s not illegal unless you tell him you’re going to get him the best price and then knowingly don’t. That’s fraud.

Re: Unethical but was it illegal?

By Reckoning • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
This isn’t a legal transaction. That’s like saying you’re just marking up trafficked children. It’s not just “market markup”, YOU ARE PARTICIPATING IN A CRIME.

Re: Unethical but was it illegal?

By TuballoyThunder • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread
Well fraudulent misrepresentation comes to mind, which could trigger wire fraud (18 U.S.C. Â 1343). Also, aiding and abetting (18 U.S.C. Â 2) is in play. Conspiracy if they are collaborating with the ransomware gang, which could bring in 18 U.S.C. Â 1030.

Wire Fraud

By SlashbotAgent • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

For those unable to chase links; he’s been charged with Wire Fraud.

https://www.justice.gov/usao-e…

Re:Success rate?

By aardvarkjoe • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

The thing about ransomware is that if paying the ransom does not actually result in decrypted files no one will ever pay a ransom again.

Many of your victims won’t be able to say anything even if the files aren’t decrypted — this case is a good example, since the company in question couldn’t admit publicly that they were paying ransoms.

A little searching shows that scams (beyond the base “pay to decrypt”) are very common. You’re dealing with criminals. If you pay a ransom, they now know that you have money that you’re willing to pay, and they’re going to do whatever they can to get more of it.

Apple Updates MacBook Pro With M6 Chips

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Ahead of the touchscreen MacBook Pro expected to debut tomorrow, Apple has refreshed its standard 14-inch MacBook Pro with the new M6 processor, promising up to 20% faster multithreaded performance, improved power efficiency, and more powerful on-device AI capabilities. The Verge reports:
Announced this morning through a press release, the new 14-inch MacBook Pro features three Thunder 4 USB-C ports that all support charging and DisplayPort connectivity, a MagSafe 3 charging port, full-size HDMI, and an SDXC memory card slot accommodating photographers. Pricing for the new M6 version of the 14-inch MacBook Pro starts at $1,999 with 16GB of memory, the same as last year’s M5 model. Preorders start on October 28th and shipping is expected to begin on November 6th.

The new M6 processor is Apple’s first 2nm chip with a bump to a 12-core CPU, up from 10 cores in the M5, and the company says it offers up to 1.2x faster multithreaded performance when compared to its predecessor. The M6 also features a Dual 16-core Neural Engine to handle heavy on-device AI tasks, plus an upgraded 12-core GPU with a Neural Accelerator in each core. In addition to performance improvements, Apple says its M6 processor is more power efficient.

Math

By Luthair • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread
There are 12 cores over the previous 10, so that is 20% or 1.2x the multithreaded performance. Does that mean they expect zero overhead, or the performance improvement of m5 to m6 is no different than the overhead.

In China, the AI Bubble Has Already Burst

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Reuters:
While global tech stocks teeter, in China they have already crashed as lofty valuations collapse under worries about AI demand and curbs on Chinese exports. The meltdown, tanking the mainland STAR50 index of AI and semiconductor leaders by 40% in less than four months and vaporizing some $480 billion in market value, is an ill omen for wobbly world markets and a dampener on China’s efforts at encouraging its savers into stocks to fund the AI boom. It has also slammed the brakes on a rally running two years, since economic stimulus promises sent shares soaring, and has stalled Beijing’s push to break with a long boom-bust pattern and drive a “slow bull” market that delivers reliable performance. China’s broad blue-chip index has dropped about 20% from highs made in June. “The stock market later evolved into a speculative crazy bull,” said Beijing-based fund manager Dong Baozhen. “And now we see the bubble bursting.”
There was no clear trigger for the selloff in China, though traders pointed to high valuations, tax bills, and the threat of foreign bans on Chinese data center equipment. According to Goldman Sachs, AI stocks account for 42% of China’s market capitalization and 57% of trading turnover, leaving investors widely exposed to the downturn.
“What’s happening is now going to put a stop for many of the companies trying to get themselves listed,” said Hong Hao, managing partner and chief investment officer at Lotus Asset Management in Hong Kong.

“Overemphasising the ‘technology content’ — that is, the weighting of tech companies by market value in major indexes — leads to a deviation, even a distortion, in capital behavior,” said Leo Wang, partner at Beijing-based Qianchuang Capital. “This created a severe bubble in certain sectors and a serious drain on others.”

“Just like all other Chinese manufacturers, (chipmakers and AI suppliers) will eventually end up in a price war,” said fund manager Wang Zhuo, partner at Shanghai Zhuozhu Investment Management. “There’s no exception,” he said. “All bubbles inevitably burst.”

I’m sort of looking forward to it.

By Petersko • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

My wealth consists of very little in the way of cash equivalents. It’s in a diversified collection of products including stocks, bonds, etc.. While I think I’m decently hedged there is a distinct possibility that there exists risk in the secondary layers, the nature of which I am unaware.

I’m 56. I would like to know where I stand. Let’s see the massive correction.

Unlike many others, though, my wealth has no components fully in the hands of funds. No pension fund, for instance. I pulled that all out at commuted value. So mine won’t suddenly evaporate from under me. Those in that situation may be less eager for the rightsizing.

Let’s keep some perspective

By Whateverthisis • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
No one, not even people in China, trust the Chinese stock markets. The companies aren’t required to be as transparent, and most of their financing is more likely to come from a State-Owned bank and debt, not the stock market. Because of that, this market tends to be a bit more like a casino than how we in the Western world might view the NYSE or the NASDAQ or the London Stock Exchange. That also means that it’s highly prone to overspeculation. As someone posted above, the NASDAQ on average is priced at around 30X earnings; by comparison the STAR50 index was trading at 250X the average earnings of its’ companies. Many of the companies were domestic hardware suppliers, but as more and more barriers are starting to rise against Chinese hardware going into AI Infrastructure, investors spooked, got out and the index fell.

For perspective:

The Shanghai Composite Index dropped 72.8% during the 2007-2008 global financial crisis. For comparison US stock markets fell around 53%, and began recovering quickly.

The Shanghai Composite again crashed 49% in 2016, when State media was encouraing people to invest in their stock market to try and grow it to become competitive to Western stock markets. Novice retail investors jumped in, and through that encouragement heavily invested with margin loans. That spooked the government, who started putting regulations on those loans; everyone panicked and the market crashed within a few weeks as everyone tried to get out to cover their margin loans.

Afterwards, the government put in these circuit breaker regulations, to stop trading if the market dropped more than a certain percentage to mitigate those steep drops, again in 2016. The first day those regulations went into place, everyone panicked, triggered a big sell off, and trading halted within minutes. Investors saw the market freeze, panicked even more, and the next day everyone rushed to get their money out, erasing roughly US $1 trillion in value and forcing Beijing to remove the circuit breaker regulations.

This market is very prone to hype, panic attacks, reactionary regulations, over confidence and underperforming. So you have to take these kinds of stories from this market with a bit of skepticism; this just appears to be a feature of the Chinese stock markets.

Not great news for Anthropic

By ddtmm • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
It will be interesting to see how this affects Anthropic’s IPO in a few weeks. With this much instability I’d definitely be waiting before investing in it at this point.

Re:It’s a trade-off

By stealth_finger • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread
Mine is 404

Chinese AI has moved to being cheap to run

By BrightCandle • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread
The Chinese AI companies have been starved of resources in a way the western companies haven’t and so they have in a lot of cases produced models that are more efficient and better designed instead of brute forcing their way bigger model to make them better. Companies like Deepseek have a model that is pretty close to the western models but its about 1/100th the price to run. Z.AI with its GLM model has quite a small model which is also very efficient to run and is also competing in the top models. Qwen is not there yet but its next AI will also use the same techniques to reduce running costs. These companies already drastically undercut the American companies and they provide their weights open so that other hosts can run it and in some cases they can be run at home. Their cloud services are much cheaper than Anthropic and OpenAI anyway. The price wars have begun.