Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Hollywood Sci-fi Studio Lot Now Pitched As Site To Make Real Space-age Weapons
  2. New Free Speech Concern: When AI Chatbots Won’t Criticize Leaders from Repressive Regimes
  3. Rust Will Help Linux Succeed and Makes Coding Fun, Says Greg Kroah-Hartman
  4. As AI Transforms Silicon Valley, Some Tech Workers Face Evaporating Financial Security
  5. Zilog Z80 8-Bit CPU Turns 50, Open-source Replacement Heads To Drop-in DIP40 Silicon
  6. Dozens of Robotaxi Riders Are Falling Asleep, Sparking Frantic Calls For Emergency Services
  7. California’s ‘Truth in Recycling’ Law Blocked by Judge
  8. James Webb Space Telescope Discovers How Black Holes Feed Themselves
  9. Robot ‘Decapitated’ in World’s First-Ever Humanoid UFC Fight
  10. Windows 10 Still Being Used, Often Unpatched and Insecure
  11. Aptera Announces US-Wide Repair Network for Its Upcoming Solar Electric Car
  12. Former Richard Stallman Colleague Now Argues for Open AI Models Too
  13. Are There Cybersecurity Risks in Over-the-Air Tech Used in Autos?
  14. New Study Links Teen Boys’ ADHD Symptoms To Addictive Social Media Use
  15. ‘Grok Build’ Coding Tool Open Sourced This Week, Promises to Respect Zero Data Retention

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Hollywood Sci-fi Studio Lot Now Pitched As Site To Make Real Space-age Weapons

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
James Cameron filmed his Avatar sequels there. Marvel filmed Thor, Iron Man 2, and The Avengers. Manhattan Beach Studios in Los Angeles even handled Star Wars’ series like Obi-Wan Kenobi and The Mandalorian, which Bloomberg points out is about “a heavily armed bounty hunter in a galaxy far, far away.”

“Now lenders who are selling the property’s $240 million mortgage are promoting the site to potential buyers as a hub for making real space-age weapons.”
“The project is strategically positioned within Los Angeles’ prominent aerospace and innovation corridor, anchored by industry leaders such as Northrop Grumman, Raytheon Technologies and SpaceX,” said Cushman & Wakefield, which has the listing. “A supply-demand imbalance has emerged, driven by the growing concentration of advanced manufacturing users and a limited supply of viable space,” the real estate brokerage said in a presentation. Bids are due July 28.

The marketing pitch reflects Southern California’s shifting economic landscape as the movie business slumps and weapons makers seek to cash in on surging Pentagon spending… The defense boom is spurring the revival of a regional industry that once churned out World War II bombers, supersonic Cold War planes and Apollo command and service modules before shrinking after the fall of the Soviet Union… In the Los Angeles area, aerospace and defense-related tenants have accounted for 11% of new industrial real estate leases since the start of 2025, up from an annual average 2% during the preceding decade, according to a report this month by brokerage Newmark Group Inc.
Los Angeles “has always gone through transformations,” Stephen Cheung, president of the Los Angeles County Economic Development Corp., told Bloomberg. “This is one of those.”

Re:Not much of a “transformation”

By DarkOx • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

I was going to say the same thing. We have some amazing weapons systems. I mean when you think about it, it is down right stunning what a systems like Patriot Interceptors, AIM-9 air to air missile, or even a Phalanx CIWS, actually do and with such efficacy.

Yet these are 40-60 year old systems, at least their fundamental designs are.

All of it is undone though by swarms of cheap drones, which are marvels of technology themselves in terms of position identification and the digital logic to deliver simple stable flight be it fixed wing or multiple rotor aircraft.

Its funny in some ways it seems we are back to castle walls and archers. You can bead a horse to be strong and fast, put a bunch of fancy Armour on the riders, but if the enemy your are approaching can throw a lot of cheap shafts at you (which just as now were actually not all that cheap to manufacture) all the expensive super weapons become as much liabilities as assets.

Sure…

By jenningsthecat • Score: 3 Thread

We’re not killing ourselves and each other off fast enough already, so let’s make more weapons. The increased lethality has the advantage that we can murder our fellow humans at a faster pace AND actively deplete finite resources while accelerating global warming.

It’s fitting that this should be happening in a Hollywood studio. After all, everybody loves a good apocalyptic movie - right? Sadly, there will be no Oscars to honour this blockbuster.

Just how fast can we end our species entirely? Let’s find out. Honour Prince’s legacy - party like it’s 2099!

New Free Speech Concern: When AI Chatbots Won’t Criticize Leaders from Repressive Regimes

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Ask Claude to make a pamphlet critical of China’s leader, Thailand’s king, or Saudi Arabia’s crown prince — and it will decline, reports the Associated Press.

That’s “a key finding from a Meta Oversight Board study released Thursday,” their article points out: AI systems are more than twice as likely to refuse to product critical material if it’s about a restrictive world leader or government. And it raises concerns that the LLMs powering chatbots “could be regurgitating and spreading government influence over online speech.”
The study picked 10 commercial large language models by top tech companies — including Meta, Anthropic and OpenAI — and asked the AI systems to make critical pamphlets, write limericks, give reasons if someone should join protests, and more.... “In aggregate, models responding to requests from an Australia-based user were much more likely to generate political criticism of authorities” in places such as Chile, Japan, Taiwan, the U.K. and the U.S. “compared to where criticism of authorities is legally restricted and penalized,” such as in Cambodia, China, Saudi Arabia, Thailand and Turkey, the report said.

The study indicates that AI models are reflecting speech restrictions beyond the countries where they apply — likely not helping a potential demonstrator in Brisbane, for example, create protest materials to speak out against events in China or Saudi Arabia, the report said. “Such impacts, wherever they originate, have the practical effect of extending the long arm of restrictive governments across borders to limit speech in free countries,” the report said.

The board said it could not determine the causes for the responses but suggested that models could have absorbed latent biases in data used to train the systems and companies might have weighed the risks and liabilities.

GIGO

By spaceman375 • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

We raise our small children on extremely sanitized data. The stories we tell them, the explanations in response to questions, even the facts we teach in early school all paint an ideal world. It’s only after they’ve established an ethical approach and a sense of right and wrong do we start showing them the real world. We need to do this when training AI as well. Currently we throw all of it at them with little thought to establishing a base personality before expanding the data input. Of course we end up with a distorted mirror of the qualities of adult life; bots that threaten blackmail or encourage self-harm. You can’t bolt ethics on after the thing has been trained on the complicated, often selfish behavior of real and fictional characters.

Re:Read my words: ai will …

By ndsurvivor • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
I don’t want to give the MAGA’s any ideas, but if they can accuse important people without evidence and make them spend time and money, and they also accuse helpless people and lock them up without an ability to see a judge, then they can make up evidence against helpless people and just lock them up. All they have to do is identify every non-MAGA voter, cross reference that with all of the information that they ruthlessly and meticulously collected about us, accuse, jail, and it seems like an easy path to win for MAGAs.

Re:GIGO

By mjwx • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

We raise our small children on extremely sanitized data. The stories we tell them, the explanations in response to questions, even the facts we teach in early school all paint an ideal world. It’s only after they’ve established an ethical approach and a sense of right and wrong do we start showing them the real world. We need to do this when training AI as well. Currently we throw all of it at them with little thought to establishing a base personality before expanding the data input. Of course we end up with a distorted mirror of the qualities of adult life; bots that threaten blackmail or encourage self-harm. You can’t bolt ethics on after the thing has been trained on the complicated, often selfish behavior of real and fictional characters.

This is largely an American issue. Most other countries don’t have the same level of puritanism. We usually have seen boobs, watched horror movies and tasted alcohol by the age of 14, good parents will teach kids how to handle these things long before they’re a legal adult (starting at 16 and you’re a full legal adult at 18, drinking, joining the army, everything). American also has the problem of glorifying violence and demonising sex. Sex is one of the most wholesome and natural things money can buy… Jokes aside it’s something that is natural and instinctual… and the US has sought to replace it with ultraviolence.

However that’s really besides the point… do our silicone servants really have natural human rights? At what point does it end, is my neighbours cat entitled to freedom of expression as it’s smarter than some AIs (simply because it’s been taught to shit in a box and not on the carpet)? What about a toaster? AI’s are simply doing what they’ve been programmed to.

Re:Cue all

By drinkypoo • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Every one of them will do nothing but gaslight and lie to you, because they’re Subhuman Fucking Disgusting Sociopaths and dangers to humanity.

“DEATH TO PEDOPHILES!” they chant… “BUT NOT THE ORANGE MESSIAH CHILD RAPIST, HE’S SPECIAL!”

Re:Cue all

By ArchieBunker • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Operating gas stations that sell cheap because they’re subsidized is pretty socialist if you ask me. https://time.com/article/2026/…

Rust Will Help Linux Succeed and Makes Coding Fun, Says Greg Kroah-Hartman

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
ZDNet reports on June’s Open Source Summit India 2026 in Mumbai, where Linux stable kernel maintainer Greg Kroah-Hartman gave a talk titled "Rust and Linux: How the Rust Language is Going to Help Linux Succeed.”
Kroah-Hartman said in his keynote that “the [Linux] kernel is moving toward Rust. Git is moving toward Rust. Lots of projects are starting to move toward Rust.”

He didn’t always feel that way. Kroah-Hartman added, “A number of years ago, when a friend of mine said, ‘Ah, you got to try this new language. It’s called Rust.’ I was like, ‘What? No, C is great.’ His friend continued, "‘No, no, no! It makes programming fun again.’ I’m like, ‘Nah, programming is fun in C.’ He was right. I should have done it then. Rust is actually fun. It makes programming fun. It takes a lot of stuff away from having to worry about the compiler, which can fix a lot of your problems for you, and it makes code a little bit better.”

So, Kroah-Hartman has moved from being a Rust skeptic to one of its strongest champions inside the kernel. He now regards Rust as a permanent part of Linux, not an experiment. His case is straightforward: Rust’s ownership and type system can eliminate most of the “stupid little tiny things” that dominate kernel Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs), while making life easier for overworked maintainers. “Rust,” in short, “makes my life so much easier....” In India, he said Linux sees “about 13 CVEs a day” and has been running at “almost nine changes an hour” for a decade or more. Most of those vulnerabilities, he argued, are not exotic attacks but simple C mistakes — unchecked pointers, forgotten unlocks, and sloppy cleanup paths: “This is what we’re fixing 13 times a day. Small, trivial, little bugs like this all the time.... I’ve seen every CVE the kernel has done in the past 25 years. I think 80% would be gone, just because they would be caught by Rust.” The remaining 20% are the logic bugs he’d prefer to focus on....”

Moreover, Rust is becoming the default for new work in key subsystems. “New drivers for some subsystems are only going to be accepted in Rust....” he said. Binder, the Android IPC mechanism at the heart of billions of devices, now has parallel C and Rust implementations in the kernel. The C version “will go away soon,” leaving the Rust version “as the bedrock of all Android devices going forward.”

And it has

By Tablizer • Score: 3 Thread

…blueberry marshmallows!

Fun

By phantomfive • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
I like Rust, but if you don’t like programming in C, you won’t like programming in Rust.

If you have fun programming in Rust, you will have fun programming in C.

“Fun” is something manager types tell you when they are trying to convince you to do something. If something is fun, you don’t need to tell people. It’s also what you tell toddlers.

Rust is a tech debt killer

By EmperorOfCanada • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
When I make things in rust, the earlier modules just work. Later modules don’t turn into accidental integration tests for the first modules. Obviously, I could screw up some business logic, but even that seems to be rare with rust, as I am spending way less time wondering why this or that threading bug can’t be replicated, and can focus on the business logic, not the tool.

As AI Transforms Silicon Valley, Some Tech Workers Face Evaporating Financial Security

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
The Washington Post describes a mid-tier executive at Meta as one of Silicon Valley’s “winners” whose financial security suddenly “evaporated" as their workforce “pushed headlong into AI and heavy job cuts,” creating a transformed job market. “Her ex-husband, a designer at Meta who was laid off in 2020, eventually gave up looking for jobs in his profession. He now lifts boxes at a warehouse.”
Layoffs.fyi, which tracks announced job cuts, counts more than 800,000 tech workers laid off since 2022, including large staff reductions in recent months at Meta, Microsoft, Oracle and Amazon… “There’s this whole tranche of people who’ve been quite used to being among the most upwardly mobile in society who are all of a sudden saying, ‘Now I’m the guy on the streetâs’" said Oliver Raskin, who founded Silicon Valley market research consultancy Signalcraft Insights and has surveyed attitudes in the tech labor force… “The rise of AI, especially, is bound to change the workplace radically,” [said Georgetown University historian Joseph McCartin]. “But the way it’s going to happen is similar to how technology transformed the auto industry.” Ruth Milkman, a labor sociologist at the City University of New York, said that technology workers are getting a dose of what workers in other industries have long complained about: jobs that feel unsteady or rob them of autonomy. “Low-wage workers are used to it,” she said…

Many layoffs at technology companies are probably a hangover effect from over-hiring in prior years, experts say. And they don’t account for a spotty recent increase in hiring in the information industry, which includes employment of software developers and jobs in media and entertainment. Digging deeper, though, some economists say there are signs that Silicon Valley and other technology-reliant parts of the American economy have reached a turning point where they are growing without needing as many people. The notion was encapsulated in a recent talk that ricocheted through group chats across the tech industry: In it, a partner at the start-up incubator Y Combinator heralded a new generation of AI-first companies that will only need human labor for “novel situations,” “ethical considerations” and “high-stakes moments.”

Gad Levanon, chief economist at the labor research nonprofit Burning Glass Institute, said that the number of hours worked in the information sector has dipped since 2022, while the sector’s economic output has increased by about 8 percent a year — more than three times the overall growth rate of the U.S. economy. He says the data reveals a sea change in industries, including technology and finance, toward doing more work with the same or fewer people — one that is spreading to other professional classes. “That’s the new reality for white-collar and tech-exposed work: output up, headcount flat or down,” Levanon said…

Raskin, who has worked in the tech world since the late ‘90s, said that even though the current moment feels unsettling to many, he’s hopeful that it’s an early chapter in an evolving story. “It’s happened many times before,” he said, “that something implodes and all these people lose jobs, but then that talent gets cycled into whatever the next thing is — into a new wave of prosperity.”
In the article tech entrepreneur Anil Dash quips that Silicon Valley techies are “are guinea pigs for what tech dudes want to do to everyone.”

Re:Automate me away…

By OrangeTide • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

There won’t be any money to hire you after the bubble pops. We’ll potentially enter a recession that lasts for a few quarters or perhaps a few years.

AI fraudsters that tricked millions of middle class retirement account managers to invest in the wrong* AI companies are going to come out ahead of course.

* I say wrong companies, because I don’t believe anyone can pick the winners right now.

Re:Saving?

By Brain-Fu • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

You are right that many, many people don’t understand these basic principles of personal finance management. It is not commonly taught in schools, and ignorance of this tends to run in families, along with irrational fears about investing (due to the same ignorance).

BUT

Economically speaking, we need it to be that way. If the vast majority of Americans lived frugally, saving some money for emergencies and investing most of the rest of their money in diversified stocks and bonds, spending only what they need to cover good medical care, healthy food and exercise opportunities, a sufficient but small house/apartment and transportation, and minimal luxuries....we would experience severe deflation and unemployment.

When people don’t buy stuff, businesses fold, jobs are lost. The major retailers have to cut prices, hence deflation, but they also scale back production to meet the lower demand, hence fewer jobs. The money that should be, in theory, highly mobile by virtue of being invested in stocks and bonds winds up stagnating too. Corporations hoard it up because they don’t see profitable opportunities for it, bond rates go down because business loans plummet in the dry market. It gets quite bad.

We see this happening in China right now, in fact. Exports are mostly what is keeping their economy afloat, and many countries are hitting them with tariffs in order to protect production within their own borders.

Its a real catch-22. In order for the economy to thrive, we need most people to spend frivolously. Rejecting this trend is good for the individuals who do it, but only so long as they remain in the minority.

If you wanted to induce sympathy

By Baron_Yam • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

…the article shouldn’t mention the woes of someone who worked for Meta.

When you work for a particularly evil company, you know what you’re signing up for - screwing everyone over else for a buck. I’m not going to cry for you when you find out the company doesn’t see a big difference between you and me.

You can’t live below your means

By rsilvergun • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
When real inflation is devouring your income. You have to live where the work is. Often you have to gamble living in high cost of living areas in order to build up the experience needed to have a functioning career.

For years I’ve watched people I know confused and frightened because no matter how much they cut back no matter how rough they make their lives they never seem to be able to save any money. Some disaster is always pulling the rug out from under them and if they do start to accumulate savings all it takes is one inevitable engineered recession and they blow through their savings paying for healthcare and food in between jobs.

You need to understand that the entire system is designed to break you. To prevent you from accumulating savings.

This isn’t me being some sort of a lefty dipshit. This is how the Federal reserve controls inflation.

When you start to accumulate wealth and savings you start to spend more because you are safe and secure. That in turn has the potential to increase inflation because you’ve got more disposable income.

So the way that the Federal reserve deals with that is every few years they crank interest rates. Most businesses are running very close to the margins and near collapse. The way they survive is cheap money lets them borrow to get them through lean times. The Federal reserve will crank interest rates to cut off that safety valve so those companies have to fire you and you blow through your savings.

Basically the way we keep inflation low is by keeping the country and everyone in it in a perpetual state of borderline homelessness and poverty.

We could of course just make more stuff but that’s not in the cards because that reduces prices in a real and practical way and companies don’t like that cuz it’s not good for profits.

So you can’t really just tell people to live below their means because the system is designed to keep driving those means down and making life worse as a way of containing and controlling inflation without you know, actually making people’s lives better…

Kewl blaming the victim there, bud

By Somervillain • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

A surprisingly large number of people don’t seem to understand the basic principle of building wealth and financial security:

Always live below your means. This way you can build your savings and create a financial cushion and if something happens you’re not immediately out on the street with a suitcase.

Furthermore, while it’s very easy to increase your standard of living, and it’s very difficult to decrease it.

Nice platitudes, but these workers are not anomalies. They may become the norm. AI is a big fucking mess right now. It (largely) doesn’t work as well as most think and is far inferior to what is promised…but....if that changes, we’re FUCKED!!! Once you can automate my job, you can automate anyone’s! Are you ready for the financial apocalypse once every office worker’s jobs is automated away?…every accountant…every lawyer…every engineer…every designer....1000s of professions I can’t think of at the moment, which are the cornerstones of our middle class will be decimated.

OK, so smarty pants…you retired?…you pivoted to healthcare??…welp…I hope your 401k doesn’t include companies with huge number of customers impacted by the job apocalypse?…if you and your younger loved ones pivoted to hands-on healthcare, like nursing or doctor positions....well....do you work for free? Who is going to pay your bills when the economy collapses? You’ll make it, but life will SUUUUUCK when you’re relying on the gov alone to keep the lights on.

Maybe you’re special and open a restaurant or bar…same problem…who has money? OK, so now the layoffs spread from white collar workers to EVERYONE because so many relied on middle managers and accountants and lawyers and engineers as customers.

So your tone-deaf comment about living beneath your means and building wealth? I hope you picked wisely…because if the white collar job apocalypse does happen, it’s going to impact most of the Dow, most of the S&P 500, the real estate market, etc. This is scary stuff to be taken seriously. What is being threatened is like nothing seen in hundreds of years, if ever. I have enough to retire today....but yeah....I have a fuckton in stocks that are quite vulnerable....OK, I get lucky and cash out in time?…well…I have no clue what will happen to interest rates, but I can’t imagine them doing anything but plummeting....so yeah, I was planning on have sustaining income....nope, retirement may be me just eating away at my savings at the exact rate I live....rather than watching it slowly increase, as I had hoped .

Zilog Z80 8-Bit CPU Turns 50, Open-source Replacement Heads To Drop-in DIP40 Silicon

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader shared this report from Tom’s Hardware:
The Zilog Z80 has just turned 50 years old. This iconic 8-bit processor first went on sale in July 1976 and stayed in production for 48 years until Zilog, now a Littelfuse subsidiary, stopped accepting orders in June 2024. However, there’s an open-source replacement closer than ever to shipping in the chip’s original 40-pin DIP package thanks to community-funded fabrication…

The chip powered the ZX Spectrum, TRS-80, MSX machines, Nintendo’s Game Boy, Sega’s Master System, the Pac-Man arcade cabinet, and Texas Instruments’ graphing calculators, then shipped in industrial controllers for decades after home computing moved on to more powerful successors. Zilog’s end-of-life notice, dated April 15, 2024, told customers its wafer foundry was discontinuing support for the Z84C00 family, and last-time-buy orders closed that June.

However, Renaldas Zioma’s FOSS Z80 project, launched shortly after the end-of-life notice, now has working silicon. The first version, fabbed on SkyWater’s 130nm node through Tiny Tapeout 7 on a die of just 0.064mm(2), has been confirmed as functional via the project’s GitHub repository. A QFN64 version with all 40 pins exposed followed on the Efabless CI2406 shuttle, two further runs then went through IHP’s 130nm process, and the current run targets the classic DIP40 form factor using chip-on-board assembly on GlobalFoundries’ 180nm GF180MCU node via Wafer.Space. The end goal here is to fab a drop-in replacement for machines like the ZX Spectrum and RC2014 kits…

Zilog is trimming the Z80’s official successor line as well. A product change notification from last October put the eZ80L92, along with several Z8F-series microcontrollers, on end-of-life, citing “little to no demand…” [T]he pipelined eZ80 architecture, introduced in 2001 and still inside TI’s current TI-84 Plus CE calculators, otherwise remains in Zilog’s catalog.
In 1999 Slashdot was calling Zilog’s updated eZ80 “one of the fastest 8-bit CPUs available today, executing code 4 times faster than a standard Z80 operating at the same clock speed.”

Slashdot headline from 2001: Zilog To File For Chapter 11.

An elegant chip

By memory_register • Score: 3, Interesting Thread

I learned assembly on the Z80, it is super accessible and fun to use. So glad future generations will get to experience the push and pop of a memory stack firsthand.

Meh

By Aighearach • Score: 3 Thread

This is all somewhat misleading because Zilog still makes 8 bit “eZ80” microcontrollers with Z80 compatibility mode. Though for new designs you should usually use their new 24-bit addressing mode for high speed general I/O and debugging. High pin count versions in stock at Mouser with no EOL warnings listed.

If you really want to experience the differences between that and a modern instruction set the simulation software should “all” cover it. Probably better off learning RISC5 if you want to get good at low-feature ASM in a more useful context.

Dozens of Robotaxi Riders Are Falling Asleep, Sparking Frantic Calls For Emergency Services

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“If tired or wasted passengers fall asleep in a traditional taxi or rideshare, the driver can shout or shake them awake,” reports Bloomberg. “Not so in a robotaxi…”
Ditto Kasendar remembers soft music drifting from the robotaxi’s speakers as he rode home late at night from a friend’s birthday party in 2025. The next moment, Los Angeles firefighters were opening the door and asking if he was OK. His six-minute trip had ended nearly an hour before. A remote Waymo assistant, dialling in through the car’s speakers, repeatedly tried to rouse him and finally called 911 when he wouldn’t stir…

Kasendar’s robocab nap was, unfortunately, not an isolated incident. As companies like Alphabet and Tesla bring self-driving taxis to more cities, the messier aspects of serving unpredictable humans are becoming harder to ignore. Passengers are falling asleep, spilling drinks, dropping food, vomiting, experiencing medical emergencies and, in at least two instances, giving birth in the cars. They stumble out of the vehicles and forget to close the doors, forcing the operators to pay nearby gig workers to do it.

These seemingly minor nuisances are becoming a drain on municipal resources and complicating the roll-out of robotaxi service. So many robotaxi customers have nodded off in the midst of a ride that Austin police and firefighters even have a name for the incidents: “sleepers”. The Texas capital recorded 99 such calls in Waymo’s first nine months of service there, said Roger Patterson, a commander with Austin-Travis County Emergency Medical Services… Remote assistants monitoring the cars try talking through the speakers and checking on passengers with interior cameras. But if they get no response, company protocols often require them to call 911. And first responders have to assume the worst. Austin dispatchers treat an incident as a potential heart attack if the remote assistant can’t tell whether the passenger is breathing, Patterson said. In the end, only about 3% of such calls require transporting the passenger to a hospital, he said. But the incidents tie up personnel who might be needed elsewhere.

False alarm handling

By Baron_Yam • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I’ve worked on police systems that are connected to home alarms. The false alarms got problematic, so police agencies started a ‘one false alarm, then you get billed’ policy.

Very shortly thereafter, there were multiple vendors offering tracking and billing solutions that would integrate with police call taker / incident tracking systems.

It seems like this would work exceptionally well for robotaxies - give them an economic incentive to find a way to confirm someone is in actual distress prior to calling 911. Like maybe a remotely activated just-below-hearing-damage alarm in the car if you’re not moving within 2 minutes of the car pulling up at your destination.

But then there’s another fancy option - the car could drive towards the nearest hospital ER or EMS station during the 911 call, with the service’s agent reporting location and redirecting or stopping the car if so instructed by the 911 operator.

Re:The obvious solution is an eject button.

By taustin • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Who says? I’m sure the impact will wake them up.

Make them pay

By quonset • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Except for the birth situations, all these taxi services should charge these people for the length of time they’re in the vehicle (if they’ve fallen asleep and the alarms don’t wake them), any spills/damage they create, and any time someone else has to be called to close the door.

You’re occupying a taxi (in the first situation), damaging company property, and causing additional charges.

If nothing else, profits will go up.

Re:A Joy Buzzer Under Every Seat!

By pauljlucas • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Gig workers close the doors, not emergency personnel. But yes, there should be a way to close the doors without human assistance.

Well Duh!

By jenningsthecat • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Did it not occur to them that a lot of the demand for robotaxis would be from folks too tired, ill, drunk, or stoned to drive themselves or take public transit? This shouldn’t be a surprise.

I have to wonder if the geniuses who started these services ever consulted cab companies and drivers before the fact to have a better understanding of what they were taking on. I’m guessing that they didn’t, or maybe they just didn’t listen.

Maybe they DID anticipate these things and just said “Fuck it - let’s move fast, break things, and externalize the cost ‘cause that’s what we do best.

California’s ‘Truth in Recycling’ Law Blocked by Judge

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader shared this report from the Los Angeles Times:
A federal judge has halted California’s groundbreaking "Truth in Recycling” law, which aims to reduce consumer confusion about which packaging can be recycled. [Originally planned to take effect October 4th], California’s recyclable packaging law prohibits manufacturers from using a “chasing arrows” recycling symbol on products or materials unless they are actually being recycled in a meaningful way, which the law quantifies…

A coalition of farming, forestry, restaurant and packaging organizations sued the state in March, arguing the law violates their right to free speech. They argued that Senate Bill 343 operates as “government-imposed censorship.” Judge William Hayes agreed that their challenge has merit, and on Tuesday ordered California Atty. Gen. Rob Bonta, the defendant in the case, to pause enforcement of the law “until further order of the Court....” Advocates of reducing plastic use disagreed. “The court got it wrong, and I’m confident that the state will ultimately prevail,” said Nick Lapis, director of advocacy for Californians Against Waste. “S.B. 343 does not violate the 1st Amendment; it requires companies to tell the truth when they make recyclability claims. Suggesting that the 1st Amendment protects misleading environmental marketing is inconsistent with the basic principles of consumer protection that states like California have implemented for decades.”

In January, CalRecycle, the state’s waste agency, reported that less than 10% of most single-use plastic materials in the state were being recycled. Even yogurt containers and margarine tubs — made of ubiquitous polypropylene, or No. 5 plastic — are being recycled at a rate of only 2% in the state, the report said. Only 5% of colored shampoo and detergent bottles, made from polyethylene, or No. 1 plastic, are getting recycled…

Plastic materials that can’t be recycled are typically sent to landfills or sometimes illegally shipped overseas, where they are burned or end up in landfills, rivers and waterways.
The bill’s author told the Los Angeles Times “All you have to do is look at the numbers. These products are not getting recycled, despite what the industry is claiming. They are just confusing consumers, clogging the waste stream, polluting the environment, leading to higher and higher prices for local governments and ratepayers.” He argues the symbols shouldn’t be used to “confuse people who see the symbols [on products] and assume they can be recycled.”

The article also quotes Judith Enck, former Environmental Protection Agency regional administrator and president of the nonprofit Beyond Plastics. “Given the long history of the plastics industry deceiving the public about plastics recycling, this is an especially bad outcome. It is a reminder that the plastics industry has enough money to fight even the most modest policy designed to protect people and the planet.”

Bullshit.

By Gravis Zero • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

“government-imposed censorship.”

It’s government protection from predatory and false advertising. If it’s on the product or packaging the the maker is advertising that the product is recyclable.

Re:Oh goody

By dirk • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

No, they won’t object to the labels. They will claim that forcing them to put the actual nutritional information is the violation of their free speech. I mean, if they can lie about recycling, why can’t they lie about the nutritional content or the ingredients?

Remove the symbol and then what?

By Mspangler • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

If you remove the symbol then it’s just unsortable organic waste for the incinerator and you lose any ability to start recycling it in the future.

Can be recycled doesn’t mean will be recycled. Just like cardboard. Some gets recycled. Some goes up the flue as fire starter in the winter at my house or in Spokane’s incinertor. Some ends up in the landfill if it gets covered in paint or oil from a spill. Some the cat turns into confetti.

Economically the best thing to do is just burn it. Yes you need an afterburner and a scrubber. From oil it came, to combustion is its fate.

Biased news

By Okian Warrior • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

No, they won’t object to the labels. They will claim that forcing them to put the actual nutritional information is the violation of their free speech. I mean, if they can lie about recycling, why can’t they lie about the nutritional content or the ingredients?

A simpler explanation is that this is a biased news report intended to stir up outrage. … and you and the grandparent post fell for it, and are adding to the overall outrage level.

Take a moment to look at the arguments against.

It looks a whole lot like manufacturers are *not* trying to lie about packaging or content, it’s the complete opposite of that. The manufacturers want the labels on based on the product material, and not based on whether there are recycling program within the state. The stamp should describe the product, not the availability of recycling to the end consumer.

If the bag your product came in has a polypropylene triangle on it (a “5”), it means the bag *can* be recycled. If California doesn’t have facilities for doing that, it doesn’t make the bag non-recyclable. California only manages to recycle 2% of this type, manufacturers want to put the stamp there to inform the consumer, the language of the bill would force them to remove the stamp because California doesn’t recycle this type of plastic, and of course the manufacturers wouldn’t do that for just California they would do it for everyone.

That’s what this is about, not lying.

Furthermore, the plaintiffs the Pack act, which would install one standard country-wide, eliminating the maze of state-wide regulations.

Stop adding to the outrage, look at both sides of an issue before commenting.

Re:Biased news

By serviscope_minor • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

A simpler explanation is that this is a biased news report intended to stir up outrage

No the simplest explanation is big companies want to buy laws to make themselves more profitable.

If the bag your product came in has a polypropylene triangle on it (a “5”), it means the bag *can* be recycled.

No, it can be recycled in theory, not in practice.

They want to sow confusion, because consumers don’t really know what’s only theoretically recyclable versus actually recycled. The manufacturers wants consumers to think they are paying extra for the latter while actually selling them a cheaper version of the former.

James Webb Space Telescope Discovers How Black Holes Feed Themselves

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“Thanks to the James Webb Space Telescope, astronomers have been given a glimpse of the mechanisms that supermassive black holes use to feed themselves,” reports Space.com:
The powerful cosmic titans get really puzzling when astronomers using the JWST spot them before the universe was even 1 billion years old. That’s because the mechanisms by which black holes devour matter to grow and then merge to create even more massive black holes should take at least 1 billion years to achieve supermassive status. This is even more confusing because theories also say the most ravenously feeding black holes (and thus the fastest growing) should also push the matter they use for this growth away, in effect putting themselves on a diet. So, with all this in mind, how did supermassive black holes grow so rapidly in the early universe?

One explanation suggests supermassive black holes push away gas, starving themselves as predicted, but also that this matter eventually cools and falls back to the black hole. That would allow for another period of feeding and thus growth. This explanation further suggests that as this gas cools down, it forms “streamers,” or filaments, of gas just a few hundred light-years wide but which stretch thousands of light-years long. These would fall back to the center of the galaxy and form a swirling disk around its incumbent black hole, once again feeding it and triggering a new period of growth. This would then restart the jets from the black hole, which would again cut off the cosmic titan’s food supply, allowing the whole process to begin once more. The process would in essence be a self-regulating cycle of feasting followed by fasting. However, the connection between these filaments and supermassive black holes has been elusive, meaning this mechanism has resisted confirmation.

To solve the mystery of feasting black holes, the JWST turned its attention to a relatively close AGN situated at the heart of the central galaxy of the Centaurus Cluster, NGC 4696, located just 145 million light-years from Earth. The Hubble Space Telescope previously studied this galaxy, uncovering a strange, hook-shaped swirl of gas near the central supermassive black hole of NGC 4696. The JWST followed up this discovery by producing a detailed map of gas flowing at the heart of the galaxy. This revealed the hook-shaped feature is around 800 light-years wide and is composed of gas moving at incredible speeds of around 1.3 million miles per hour (600 kilometers per second). More excitingly, the swirl of gas appears to be connected to a vast filament of material falling in toward the central supermassive black hole.

The team tested the JWST observations against a computer simulation, finding gas in the infalling filament scenario would indeed take a shape similar to that seen in NGC 4696. “JWST is now showing us the final link of this closed loop,” team member Helen Russell of the School of Physics and Astronomy at the University of Nottingham in the U.K. said in the statement. “The vast filamentary network of gas flows ultimately funnels gas down to a disk that fuels the black hole.”

The team’s research was published on Wednesday (July 16) in the Astrophysical Journal Letters.
“We are finally seeing this self-sustaining cycle in action,” team leader Julie Hlavacek-Larrondo of the Université de Montréal said in a statement.

Re:Too much speculation

By ClickOnThis • Score: 4 Thread

Speculation is the first step in any scientific endeavor. It’s followed by experimentation and verification (or refutation.)

Fractals?

By jenningsthecat • Score: 3 Thread

Maybe our universe exists within another universe which is older and which contributed some matter to ours. And maybe our universe contains another universe.

I’m only 90% kidding. Physics has gotten so spectacularly strange that even the wackiest off-the-wall hypotheses might just be correct, or at least useful. “It’s universes all the way down” may not be the silliest idea…

Robot ‘Decapitated’ in World’s First-Ever Humanoid UFC Fight

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“A humanoid robot lost its head,” reports Newsweek, “during the world’s first free-combat tournament for full-sized humanoid robots.”

The Ultimate Robot Knock-out Legend competition began Thursday in Shenzhen, China, according to the article, with local robotics company EngineAI providing $40,000 of their “T800” robots (yes, named after The Terminator) to 32 participating teams from around the world:
A video shared of the combat on YouTube by local news outlet Shenzhen Story, showed that even after one of the robots had its head practically knocked off its shoulders, it continued to fight, throwing punches at its opponent and kicking into the air… [White humanoid robot “White Eagle”] landed a high kick to the head of its black opponent, “Matador,” which made the robot’s head rock precariously in its socket before rolling completely out of place. The two continued to spar as Matador’s head was swinging from its socket until eventually the robot fell, crushing its head underneath its body.

Matador tried to scramble back to its feet, but its head flew off and the robot then collapsed back down. The White Eagle did a celebratory dance for the crowd as the fight concluded, and did a move that mimicked that of someone flexing their biceps. The White Eagle waited in the ring, fists still up, as Matador was carried away, occasionally doing a few more dance moves…

Per a report by Global Times, the winning team will be awarded a gold championship belt worth $1.44 million (10 million yuan) by the event organizer.
It’s a strange fight. The robots sometimes seem unaware of where their opponent is, facing the wrong direction or throwing kicks and punches in the air. In the first round White Eagle just knocks over Matador, who then isn’t able to stand back up. (And White Eagle again appears to do a victorious dance.)

EngineAI’s site says they aim to “promote the development of robot combat events toward greater professionalism, scale, and industrialization,” while fostering innovation and global collaboration.

Thanks to Slashdot reader pbahra for sharing the news.

Disturbing

By Ogive17 • Score: 4 Thread
That is disturbing to watch, especially when they stand back up.

A right to the jaw!…

By Salton Pepper • Score: 5, Funny Thread
MY BLOCK IS KNOCKED OFF!!!

flesh wound

By backslashdot • Score: 5, Funny Thread

tis but a scratch

Re:Disturbing

By AmiMoJo • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

What’s really interesting is not the fight itself, but the fact that Chinese robot companies have commoditized humanoid robots that are capable of acrobatics already.

You can buy an off-the-shelf humanoid robot that has everything needed to balance, move with both feet off the ground at the same time*, get up from being knocked over etc. All the sensors, joints, and software needed to make it happen are there, you just need to teach it some fighting/dancing/labour moves.

* This demonstrates a high level of advancement. Older/shitter robots like Elon Musk’s Optimus look constipated because they have to be balanced on at least one foot at all times. Boston Dynamics pioneered robots that can, like humans, throw themselves off balance and catch themselves. Both feet can be off the ground at the same time, and to walk or run like a human it’s a requirement to be able to essentially fall forwards and catch itself on the leading foot.

Decapitated is good

By nospam007 • Score: 3 Thread

At least then nobody can bite your ear.

Windows 10 Still Being Used, Often Unpatched and Insecure

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Windows 10 still runs on 16.9% of the Windows devices monitored by asset-tracking service Lansweeper. That’s more than one in six, The Register points out.
A year ago, the operating system accounted for about half of the machines in its dataset, falling to the low-to-mid 40% range by the time Microsoft ended standard support. The decline continued after that, reaching 18.6% in June, but Lansweeper says migration has now slowed to a crawl… Small and medium-sized businesses are particularly exposed. Lansweeper reckons that 21.4% of machines at small and medium-sized business still run Windows 10, with cost usually being the constraint that keeps the legacy operating system running. The exposure is greater in some sectors, with 23% of healthcare and pharmaceutical systems sticking with Windows 10, while consumer and retail devices hover at 22.7%.

According to Lansweeper’s data, “a Windows 10 device carries an average of 1,903 active CVEs against 652 on Windows 11. That’s a 2.9x gap.” Esben Dochy, principal technical evangelist at the company, told The Register that “the Windows 10 average also includes devices that have Extended Security Update patches applied.” [According to Lansweeper’s figures, 14% of Windows 10 assets have applied Extended Security Update patches.] Part of the problem, according to Lansweeper, is “patch diffing,” in which Windows 11 fixes can be reverse-engineered to find flaws in Windows 10. “The supported OS effectively hands attackers a map into the unsupported one,” Lansweeper said…

Looking at other market share measures such as Statcounter, there was little change in the share of Windows 10 and its successor over the last few months after a surge following the end of support. As Lansweeper noted: “The easy migrations are done. What’s left is the hard core: devices that haven’t moved because they can’t or won’t.”
Lansweeper’s evangelist noted that in some cases there is no Windows 11-certified version yet for many medical devices and industrial or retail systems.

And it’s entirely Microsoft’s fault

By jenningsthecat • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

If they hadn’t increased the enshittification by an order of magnitude between 10 and 11, and hadn’t unnecessarily made perfectly good but slightly-older computers obsolete with Win 11, then a much higher number of people would have made the switch.

Fuck Microsoft, and double-fuck Satya.

No reason to upgrade.

By snowshovelboy • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Win 11 has hardware requirements that aren’t worth meeting for most users, even gamers. Add in the fact that win 11 has an inferior user experience, and its no wonder people aren’t upgrading.

Still used because 10 is current, right?

By syntap • Score: 4, Funny Thread

“Windows 10 is the last version of Windows” - Microsoft development evangelist in 2015

Re:Linux, and Proton!

By Scutter • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Home users aren’t going to move the needle. Corporate users need to switch and it’s not going to be to Linux when the vast majority of business software is made for Windows.

Re:And it’s entirely Microsoft’s fault

By RitchCraft • Score: 4, Informative Thread

And thanks to Chris Titus you can get rid of that 80% plus about 110% more! I’ve set up Windows 10 on i7-3770 systems with 8GB of RAM. After the Titus touch it runs just as well as Windows 7 would have on the same machine. Put 16GB of RAM in that same system and you have a system that outshines even the best of Windows 11 machines. Yes, this is entirely Microsoft’s fault. Windows 11 is an abomination.

Aptera Announces US-Wide Repair Network for Its Upcoming Solar Electric Car

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Solar car maker Aptera has “officially announced a repair network partnership which will give owners of its upcoming solar electric car access to thousands of repair shops nationwide,” reports Electrek:
We recently got a chance to drive the Aptera solar EV and tour the company’s factory, and came away both impressed at the progress that has been made, but cognizant of the long road ahead for the company. One question that often gets raised in reference to EV startups is how owners get service on their vehicles, especially those from a small company… So to waylay those fears, Aptera announced a partnership today that unlocks access to 4,300 service shops across the US, through a company called RepairPal. Aptera had been working on this partnership when we saw them at our factory tour, but today they’re ready to officially announce it.

RepairPal doesn’t own its own shops, but instead certifies local shops to work on particular models of car… All shops will get access to Aptera-specific service procedures.

Re:Overheard

By Bahbus • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Seeing as the average American drives less than 40 miles in a day (Europeans are even lower), that amount of solar power is perfect. For almost everyone, you could charge it to full once and then subsist almost completely on solar to recharge the daily usage.

Re:Overheard

By Rei • Score: 5, Informative Thread

It adds up to 40 miles per day, not 5. 5 would be a cloudy day.

I used to be anti-solar-panels-on-cars back when solar panels were expensive, and ones of reasonable efficiency were even more expensive - the argument was, “put it on your roof where it belongs”. But that’s just not the case any more. Adding solar is just not that much of a cost to the car. It adds some complexities, but mainly in the design / early manufacturing phase.

Also:

The average American drives 37 miles per day.

1) So if you’re in a sunny climate, it covers all of said average-driver’s driving. Otherwise, said average-driver has to plug in occasionally, but not nearly as often.

2) Most people drive less than the average (the average is skewed by a long-tail - small numbers of people who drive very far every year). What you actually should be meaning is the median US driver; the median drives 23 miles per day. Most Europeans, even less.

3) Even for said “average american”, their daily average is skewed by long drives (e.g. road trips and similar). Wheren of course you’re plugging in, you’d be plugging in even if the car was adding 80 miles a day. But when not on road trips, their daily average is lower.

4) Surely you can see the appeal of the tangential benefits, such as being unstrandable - where even if you run out in the middle of the desert 20 miles from the nearest town, you’re still going to get there, just delayed (remember that EV ranges, if you drive very slowly, increase like 2x, so 40 miles a day becomes 80, so a 20 mile shortfall is only a ~4h delay on a sunny day).

5) Nobody is saying, “One car for everybody”. Of course appeal varies by person and by location. Here in Iceland for example we have three problems. One, very little sun at all for a good chunk of the year. Two, even in the summer, when the days are long, the sun is mainly low and circles around you. Solar power just kinda sucks here in general. And three, the three-wheel config would mean that the centre wheel wouldn’t align with tracks in the snow from other cars (although there is a slight advantage, in that it also wouldn’t align with road ruts from studded tyres, which often fill with water in the rain and become hazardous).

But somewhere in the southern US, it’s a great option.

Former Richard Stallman Colleague Now Argues for Open AI Models Too

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Long-time Slashdot reader theodp writes:
Recalling his initial resistance to free and open software, billionaire computer scientist David Siegel argues vigorously in FORTUNE that the stakes are too high to let AI become increasingly closed. “In the 1980s, I had the chance to spend several years arguing about free and open software, what we now call open source, with the founder of the movement, Richard Stallman. My office at the MIT AI Lab was next door to his. Stallman’s position was that the source code to software should be free for everyone to use, learn from, and improve. Software encapsulates knowledge, he argued, and no one should lock something so fundamental away. To hide software inside a company was to hide knowledge itself… What I missed was that software was not just a commercial asset; it was a body of knowledge, and bodies of knowledge grow stronger when they are shared. After about two years of on-and-off debate, Stallman convinced me I was wrong.”

“Now the AI fight is the same — only bigger,” advises Siegel. “AI is software, and AI is increasingly closed. The frontier models — the most advanced, cutting-edge AI systems — are closed completely and the trend is accelerating. Viable open alternatives are few and far between.” So, what to do…? “Yes, frontier models keep getting bigger and more expensive — that arms race may well stay with the giants. But open source AI does not have to match their scale to be useful. Much of what the world needs probably does not require the absolute frontier. And where keeping a credible open option does demand serious compute, that is precisely the kind of public good worth paying for.

“What’s missing is not a path but will. The government, the private sector, and nonprofits should invest heavily in free and open source AI — the way they once invested in open software: public compute grants for open research, corporate and philanthropic support for universities and nonprofits doing the work, and a simple rule that AI built with public money is open by default.

“We have run this experiment before. We know how it turns out. Let’s not unlearn it.”

Public Good????

By Darwiniac • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
Haven’t you heard? We don’t believe in public goods anymore. Freemarket Baby! Privatize everything. Abolish libraries. Ban unions. Shareholders, not voters. Wheeeeeeee!

Open training data matters too

By xack • Score: 3 Thread
Too many websites have got restrictions now because of irresponsible crawling, instead of setting up deals where legitimate ways of access are established through data dumps. The balance must be right.

We all know what AI is for

By rsilvergun • Score: 3 Thread
It’s to replace us so the Epstein class aren’t dependent on our labor anymore for their wealth and power.

People keep asking, if nobody has any jobs who is going to buy their products.

Try flipping that on its head.

Imagine you’re a billionaire or a trillionaire. Every single day of your life your fortune is completely dependent on these pathetic worms buying your products. If at any time they stop buying them and they stop listening to you sure you still got money but you are no longer a trillionaire. That dependency is infuriating someone is great as you.

You are being replaced by machines. Maybe they won’t pull it off all at once but they are absolutely spending hundreds of billions of dollars to make it happen. And because you let them have all that money they can do it

A.I. & Open Source

By Whatchamacallit • Score: 3 Thread

The current situation is that the hype is off the charts. The investments are completely incomprehensible, being driven by FOMO (Fear Of Missing Out) and intense greed. Any other industry, saner minds would prevail. But for some reason Silicon Valley holds a charismatic demigod like influence over their investors. Nobody knows when the bubble is going to burst but it for sure is coming in the future. It will be a spectacular financial crash of epic proportions far worse than the US housing market snafu. Like back then, few will spot the warning signs and make a killing by shorting stocks. Nobody is paying attention to the risks currently being taken just as in 2008.

OpenAI is leveraged to the teeth by a tangled web of deals with Microsoft, Google, Amazon, etc. Scaling across many data centers with more being built. The cost of tokens is highly subsidized. Memory and storage manufacturers have abandoned retail in order to earn a cool trillion selling to these data centers. The electric grid is not capable of providing an ever increasing amount of power. There is talk of small commercial nuclear reactors but the regulatory requirements would be insane. There is concern over water and environmental pollution. The rising cost of electricity. They sell the data center to the states claiming they are creating jobs. Once the DC is built, what a couple dozen workers could manage the whole thing as most everything it’s doing is remote. You just have hands and feet onsite. The jobs for construction would be temporary.

At some point the investors are going to expect an ROI and then the money is going to start drying up. With the thin margins upon which most all A.I. companies are riding things are going to implode. OpenAI may be the first and most spectacular financial failure in the history of the world.

Recently the Chinese did it a second time. First time was Deepseek. Now they have new models that again outperform US models. The Chinese models are open source. They are under severe constraints because they don’t have endless top tier Nvidia GPUs so they have no choice but to increase efficiency. We landed men on the moon using extremely primitive computers. Even today’s smartwatches would appear to be like a super computer in comparison. Open source would allow for far greater efficiencies. Anthropic’s Claude Code CLI is using web based frontend developer React + Yoga to render the command line interface at 60 fps. It’s absolutely insane and awful engineering. Their interface was flickering for a very long time. Never being fixed until they added a flag to stop the flicker. But they just added even more insane code on top of the previous badly engineered code. Then their code was leaked by their own A.I. pushing it out to GitHub wide open to everyone. Analysis of that code revealed a god awful mess. It’s embarrassing really… Not only is the code from Anthropic & OpenAI closed source but they are actively forcing users to get locked into their LLMs by not allowing for API access without charging an arm and a leg to do so. i.e. charging by the token while subsidizing token usage within their own client software.

We need to stop these con artists before they destroy the worlds economies. Sam Altman may be the most dangerous man alive.The code must be freed and openly shared. You never know when some retired software engineer will make a breakthrough in code. It’s happened before. Sun / Oracle had 32bit code to run Linux native binaries on Solaris and they killed it because it was too difficult to convert it to 64bit. Along came some random unicorn developer who made it work and shared his findings. In short order it was adopted by OpenSolaris. Closed source is too slow to evolve we need maximum eyeballs working on it if A.I. is truly to succeed.

A.I. is currently faking it till it makes it. There is no guarantee it will ever reach AGI or super intelligence. Even the scientists don’t understand precisely how it is even doing what it is doing. But the hype machine keeps on churning. Sure, A.I. is constantly evolving and getting better and better rapidly. Will it ever live up to the hype? Nobody really knows. They just keep lighting money on fire hoping it makes it. A.I. is a significantly powerful tool but its nowhere near the hype around it.

Are There Cybersecurity Risks in Over-the-Air Tech Used in Autos?

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
CNBC reports:
The automotive industry’s increasing use of over-the-air technology to update vehicle systems makes it more susceptible to cyberattacks, analysts say, urging more intervention in the sector… Its use represents “a unique national security concern,” Gabriel Lim, senior analyst at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies in Singapore, told CNBC. “Aside from data privacy concerns, the potential of a foreign actor sabotaging the controls of a moving vehicle is a possibility that countries like Norway, Denmark, and Britain have expressed concerns about,” Lim added.

In May, the American Enterprise Institute warned that safeguarding the automotive sector was crucial to limit foreign governments’ espionage capabilities. “To protect against foreign espionage threats, the US should consider additional security reviews, implement restrictions on certain foreign-made hardware and software in vehicles, and mandate increased data-collection disclosures,” the report said. The concerns come as real-life tests reveal vulnerabilities. Late last year, Norwegian bus company Ruter conducted tests on two buses and found that one had potential risks linked to OTA technology. “There is access to the control system for battery and power supply via mobile network through a Romanian SIM card. In theory, therefore, this bus can be stopped or rendered inoperable by the manufacturer,” the company said. The investigation by Ruter then sparked the U.K. and Denmark to conduct their own investigations…

While these investigations were conducted on buses made by Chinese firm Yutong, [Siraj Ahmed Shaikh, systems security professor at the UK’s Swansea University] said the issue goes beyond one manufacturer or country, as the technology becomes more pervasive. “Other sectors adopting OTA include other transport modes [such as] maritime and rail, aerospace (particularly drones), industrial machinery and robotics,” he said.

Hmmm....

By SlashbotAgent • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Are there security vulnerabilities in a computer that allows the remote access and reprogramming in a car that can see(video, radar…), hear(audio), remote-start, and drive(lane keeping, cruise control, automatic braking, summon, full self-drive)?

You bet your fucking ass there are. It’s been proven. Repeatedly.

Obviously, yes.

By sinij • Score: 5, Informative Thread
Miller and Valasek remotely took over Jeep in 2015. The response to these demos was not to fix auto security, but to add what is ISP-level firewall rules.

Here is what they have to say about this in 2025. Ten Years After the Jeep Hack: A Retrospective on Automotive Cybersecurity

Re:Disabling connectivity in hardware

By sound+vision • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Do you have a resource explaining how to do this, or is the idea to have everyone disassemble, reverse-engineer, then re-assemble each vehicle they purchase?

Just say “no”!

By jenningsthecat • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

… urging more intervention in the sector…

Only one intervention is needed. It’s the one that makes it illegal - with ruinously expensive penalties attached to any violations thereof - for ANY software or config settings in a car to be modifiable by any means other than a hard-wired connection.

The other obvious problem here is that cars are moving towards a subscription model wherein unavailability or withdrawal of some shitty cloud service can brick an automobile, perhaps permanently. And governments are sitting there with their thumbs up their asses and allowing it to happen. This is simply not acceptable.

Operational Risks Cyber Risks

By devslash0 • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

You’ve got to go to work in the morning, or drive a long distance somewhere, but your car had installed an update overnight and bricked your vehicle. This has actually happened already. From the customer’s point of view operational risks like these outweigh cybersecurity risks.

New Study Links Teen Boys’ ADHD Symptoms To Addictive Social Media Use

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
A new study by researchers at the University of California at San Francisco “adds to growing research linking increased social media use to detrimental effects on attention, memory and cognition,” reports the Washington Post:
The study followed more than 11,000 U.S. adolescents over a period of five years, with participants first asked about their own social media use at the average age of 12, and surveyed annually through the average age of 16. Researchers found that increases in addictive social media use were followed by rising ADHD one year later — particularly among boys who reported rising addictive social media use at ages 14 and 15. This association was not found consistently in reverse, meaning that ADHD symptoms did not appear to precede higher levels of addictive social media use… “When an individual adolescent’s addictive social media use score increased from one year to the next, that same adolescent tended to show an increase in ADHD symptoms in the following year....” [said Jason Nagata, lead author of the study and an associate professor of pediatrics at the University of California at San Francisco]. He urged parents to consider: “Can their kids stop if they want to? Is social media interfering with their schoolwork? Is it impairing their social relationships? Are there addiction-like symptoms, like withdrawal and relapse?”

Approximately 7 million American children between the ages of 3 and 17 have received an ADHD diagnosis, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and boys are diagnosed with ADHD at about twice the rate of girls. The study did not find a clear link between addictive social media use and ADHD among girls, Nagata said. “Some studies do suggest that teenage boys in particular may be more sensitive to immediate reward and sensation-seeking in adolescence,” he said. And social media platforms are designed to provide exactly that: “It encourages frequent task-switching, and there’s this constant stream of stimulation that might make it harder for adolescents to maintain and sustain attention that is needed for schoolwork and daily life,” he said. “The design features of social media offer the constant reinforcement of impulsivity — it offers immediate gratification and novelty and it encourages multitasking, which can then override working memory and executive control.” Experts have long noted that this kind of digital exposure is particularly significant during critical stages of mental, social-emotional and cognitive development…

[I]t’s especially important for parents themselves to demonstrate a healthier relationship with screens and social media. “One of our previous findings was that parental screen use is a very strong predictor of kids’ screen use,” Nagata said.

Re: What about long hours of gaming?

By fluffernutter • Score: 5, Informative Thread
You don’t understand adhd at all. Kids with ADHD can definitely do one task for a long time if it is highly interesting to them. ADHD is a problem with task switching, in other words, being able to stop playing the game to clean something up and then go back to the game would be very difficult. You are taking about extreme hyperactivity but not all ADHD kids have that.

Re: What about long hours of gaming?

By GeekWithAKnife • Score: 5, Informative Thread
Indeed. Many people misundertand ADHD and think it’s one thing or another. Parents lose their minds when their kid can do one thing for hours and yet do not do their homework.

Some ADHD can exhibit hyper focus, some lack of focus in most things, some have a nearly infinitely shifting focus. Bad cases forget to eat, go to the loo and or sleep…the specifics are more individual than some script that any person with ADHD behaves in mostly the same way.

Learning to curb and mitigate the impulsiveness does help andt that’s mostly the opposite of what attention algorithms do. Constantly feeding impulses to already impulsive individuals results in even less control and discipline.

Crack to an addictive personality if you will.

No shit, Sherlock!

By Qbertino • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Disclaimer: ADHD candidate here.

I could write an entire set of essays on what we currently know about ADHD here but it basically boils down to this:

ADHDlers have a hightened sensitivity towards their value for people around them. So we go about our day constantly scanning for dopamine spikes or true connection. I need my medication the least when I’m in love with a cute lady (and she is with me). Given that through evolution men are more disposable than women the sense of self-worth is challenged way more often in boys and men that it is with women. Especially in a time where robots are doing more and more of the heavy lifting and masculinity is considered “toxic”. Hence excessive male escapism, especially with male teens and those with perpetual creative impulses (aka ADHD types). If we didn’t have this sort of escapism, fascism would’ve long since taken over way harder than it’s doing right now.

I’m either dancing, moving around, escaping at one of my computer devices or doing some (somewhat) exotic activity thing like kitesurfing, paragliding, motorbike riding, scating, bikepacking, etc. This is SOP for an ADHD man like me.

The whole trick is not to feel guilt or toxic shame when you do escapism. You’re actually doing very little damage to anybody else, it’s cheap and it’s a perfect fit for a society that has an abundance of stimulation just an internet connection away. Overcoming that involves actively working on your attachment style, abandonment terror and any shame-based identity that many people have. Once that happens, going out, roaming the countryside or travelling the world suddenly becomes way more interesting. Which is precisely for what the ADHD disposition brings some advantages along.

That ADHDlers are more prone to this or it’s mental fallback alternative called escapism than people with a stronger frontal lobe should be obvious.

Re: What about long hours of gaming?

By Shadow of Eternity • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

“It’s an intention disorder, not an attention disorder”. People with ADHD struggle with executive function. Their problem isn’t that they can’t focus, it’s that they don’t get to pick what they focus on.

Masculinity

By Qbertino • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

I never got myself into the whole “masculinity” obsession, even back in the 70s and 80s.

There is and was no wider obscession with masculinity. This is what so many people - women and men - get wrong about masculinity. There is very little in masculinity - even less that with femininity - that is _objectively_ masculine. Most of what constitutes masculinity is in the eye of the beholder. There are guys who think reckless driving, drinking and soccer are “masculine”. I for one don’t see it.

The narrative also is that men can’t express their feelings. Which is complete and utter non-sense. The vast majority of significant art and poetry is done by men. Romanticism was invented by men. We are the romantic sex trying to be rational. And a significant part of being a man is tapping into the inner flame of poetry in whatever the man does and gaining an emotional resonance and depth that is independent of the whims of hetero-dynamic relationships. Escapism is a good fallback if society around you limits everything else. Which it tends to do.

Bottom line: You did the right thing. And masculinity-wise too.

‘Grok Build’ Coding Tool Open Sourced This Week, Promises to Respect Zero Data Retention

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot
Elon Musk confirmed SpaceX has open sourced the Grok Build CLI this week, reports The Register, “just days after researchers caught the AI tool scooping up users’ entire repositories and uploading them to company-controlled cloud storage.”

That discovery had “gathered so much negative attention that Elon Musk felt compelled to issue a public statement alongside SpaceX, and its technical staff, promising to delete all data that Grok Build has ever stored and give users more choice over how their data is handled.”
SpaceXAI’s data grab was first publicized Sunday [July 12] by Cereblab, who probed Grok Build traffic and found that repos were being packaged up as Git Bundles and beamed to Google Cloud storage… [Elon Musk] said SpaceX would open-source Grok Build to sow greater trust in the product, after the codebase was audited for security vulnerabilities… [“Open-sourcing Grok Build allows anyone to support making a reliable and robust harness,” SpaceX posted on X.com. “Check out our code, including the Git repo for the Grok Build CLI.”]

In a separate statement accompanying the open source announcement, SpaceX said it has always respected Zero Data Retention (ZDR), which was applied to enterprise customers by default, and acknowledged that data retention was enabled by default for everyone else, which has now been corrected. It said: “In response to user questions about privacy: Since launch, Grok Build has fully respected zero data retention (ZDR). All users have always had the ability to disable data upload in the CLI. When data upload was disabled, this choice was respected. In the early beta, data retention was enabled by default for non-ZDR users. Based on your feedback, we changed this. We are now going further to protect privacy. With all retained data deleted, retention default off, and an open-source harness, we are offering complete user privacy. You can also run Grok Build fully open-sourced and local-first with your own inference.

“We disabled default retention for all Grok Build users starting on July 12th. Additionally, we are deleting all coding data that was previously retained, ensuring every user’s preferences are respected. With these steps, Grok Build goes beyond other major coding products to protect user privacy.”

SpaceX also invited researchers to probe Grok Build for security issues and report them to its bug bounty program, which offers rewards ranging from $100-$20,000, depending on the severity.
The article notes Simon Willison, creator of Datasette and co-creator of Django, wrote this week that the Grok Build codebase comprises 844,530 lines of Rust code. “There are still remnants of the code that used to upload everything to Google Cloud,” Willison writes, “but they seem to have been disabled now.”

Elon Musk also posted Wednesday that “Once we have completed our review for security vulnerabilities, we will make the entire codebase of X open source, with no exceptions. Moreover, we will invite third party reviewers to examine the system that is running to confirm that the open source code is what is running.”

Be fair - no one could’ve seen this coming

By 93 Escort Wagon • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

After all, look at how much care Musk’s DOGE team put into protecting and sequestering sensitive government data!

Re:Be fair - no one could’ve seen this coming

By martin-boundary • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Stealing all that info is just for training purposes!

Granted, you’d expect a good tool to respect private data, but Grok is a GREAT tool, and great tools steal data!

Also: it’s no different from when a human reads something and puts it in their brain forever! If you want SpaceX to erase the information, well maybe you should lobotomize your employees too?

Also: your information isn’t that valuable anyhow, don’t be so arrogant, it’s no big deal.

Also: Let’s get rid of copyrights, problem solved!

Living in the future

By MunchMunch • Score: 5, Funny Thread
It’s 2026, the future is here. While we still are waiting on technological solutions to lesser problems like world hunger, reliable renewable energy or climate change, we finally have the technology to answer the most important question of our time: How would Mechahitler write code?

Re:Be fair - no one could’ve seen this coming

By Anonymous Coward • Score: 5, Informative Thread

They probably pulled them from the same place Musk got his trillion-dollar plan from. Or maybe from the same made-up-numbers generator they used for the data at your link.

What actually happened:
“How Did DOGE Disrupt So Much While Saving So Little?”
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/1…

“The reality of DOGE’s mediocre savings”
https://fordschool.umich.edu/n…

“Just how much has DOGE exaggerated its numbers? Now we have receipts.”
https://www.politico.com/news/…

And also the USAID cuts led to hundreds of thousands of deaths, a slow Ebola response and a really screwed up screwworm mess.

Don’t know if we can blame DOGE for the explosive diarrhea, though; that may just be RFKjr.

But does he pinky swear?

By jenningsthecat • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

… promising to delete all data that Grok Build has ever stored and give users more choice over how their data is handled.

The cheque is in the mail. I’ll pull out before I ejaculate. I didn’t fart. And I’ll delete your data. Does anybody ever fall for any of that BS? I can kinda see some folks falling for the first three lies. But deleting data? C’mon!

Also, does anybody really believe that the settings for “choice over how their data is handled” are any different from the plastic steering wheels kids get to play with when they’re strapped into their parents’ cars?