Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Startup Set To Brick $800 Kids Robot Is Trying To Open Source It First
  2. Axiom’s Private Space Station Could Arrive As Early As 2028
  3. 10 Years Later: Malaysia To Resume Hunt For Flight MH370
  4. Cory Doctorow’s Prescient Novella About Health Insurance and Murder
  5. ‘Yes, I am a Human’: Bot Detection Is No Longer Working
  6. EU Wants Apple To Open AirDrop and AirPlay To Android
  7. 10,000 Amazon Workers Go On Strike Ahead of Holiday Rush
  8. Justice Department Unveils Charges Against Alleged LockBit Developer
  9. Qualcomm Processors Properly Licensed From Arm, US Jury Finds
  10. Arizona’s Getting an Online Charter School Taught Entirely By AI
  11. CFPB Sues America’s Largest Banks For ‘Allowing Fraud To Fester’ on Zelle
  12. Apple Pulls Lightning-Equipped iPhones From Swiss Stores Ahead of EU USB-C Mandate
  13. Michael Dell Says Adoption of AI PCs is ‘Definitely Delayed’
  14. We’re About To Fly a Spacecraft Into the Sun For the First Time
  15. Why Online Returns Are a Hassle Now

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Startup Set To Brick $800 Kids Robot Is Trying To Open Source It First

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Last week, startup Embodied announced it was closing down, and its product, an $800 robot for kids ages 5 to 10, would soon be bricked. Now, in a blog post published on Friday, CEO Paolo Pirjanian shared that Embodied’s technical team is working on a way to open-source the robot, ensuring it can continue operating indefinitely. Ars Technica reports:
The notice says that after releasing OpenMoxie, Embodied plans to release “all necessary code and documentation” for developers and users. Pirjanian said that an over-the-air (OTA) update is now available for download that will allow previously purchased Moxies to support OpenMoxie. The executive noted that Embodied is still “seeking long-term answers” but claimed that the update is a “vital first step” to “keep the door open” for the robot’s continued functionality.

At this time, OpenMoxie isn’t available and doesn’t have a release date. Embodied’s wording also seems careful to leave an opening for OpenMoxie to not actually release; although, the company seems optimistic. However, there’s also a risk of users failing to update their robots in time and properly. Embodied noted that it won’t be able to support users who have trouble with the update or with OpenMoxie post-release. Updating the robot includes connecting to Wi-Fi and leaving it on for at least an hour. “It is extremely important that you update your Moxie with this OTA as soon as possible because once the cloud servers stop working you will not be able to update your robot,” the document reads. Embodied hasn’t said when exactly its cloud servers still stop working.

Axiom’s Private Space Station Could Arrive As Early As 2028

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Axiom Space has revised its plan for assembling its commercial space station by launching the Payload, Power, and Thermal module first, enabling it to operate as a free-flying platform as early as 2028 — two years ahead of the original timeline. Space.com reports:
NASA awarded Axiom Space a contract in 2020 to attach one or more modules to the International Space Station (ISS), which is set to retire by 2030 at the earliest. The original plan called for Axiom to detach a multi-module group from the ISS, creating a commercial outpost in low Earth orbit that will continue operating after the ISS is gone. But that plan has now been altered.

To create its space station, Axiom plans to launch five modules: a payload/power/thermal element, an airlock, a research/manufacturing hub, and a pair of habitat modules. The original plan was for Axiom to launch the Habitat 1 module to the ISS first, followed by the additional elements. The new assembly sequence will see the Payload, Power and Thermal module launch to the ISS first. This module could detach from the station — and become a free flyer called Axiom Station — as soon as 2028, according to the company. After that happens, Axiom will continue assembling the outpost, launching the Habitat 1 module to meet up with it. Habitat 1 will be followed by the airlock, the Habitat 2 module, and then the research and manufacturing facility.
Angela Hart, a manager for the Commercial Low Earth Orbit Development Program at NASA’s Johnson Space Center in Houston, said: “The updated assembly sequence has been coordinated with NASA to support both NASA and Axiom Space needs and plans for a smooth transition in low Earth orbit.”

10 Years Later: Malaysia To Resume Hunt For Flight MH370

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Reuters:
Malaysia has agreed to resume the search for the wreckage of missing Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370, its transport minister said on Friday, more than 10 years after it disappeared in one of the world’s greatest aviation mysteries. Flight MH370, a Boeing 777 carrying 227 passengers and 12 crew, vanished en route from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing on March 8, 2014.

[…] MH370’s last transmission was about 40 minutes after it took off from Kuala Lumpur for Beijing. The pilots signed off as the plane entered Vietnamese air space over the Gulf of Thailand and soon after its transponder was turned off.
“Our responsibility and obligation and commitment is to the next of kin,” Transport Minister Anthony Loke told a press conference. “We hope this time will be positive, that the wreckage will be found and give closure to the families.”
Further reading: Could Sea Explosions Finally Locate the 2014 Crash Site of Flight MH370?

Suggestions

By Rubinhood • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Can they maybe start by explaining why the “murder/suicide by pilot” theory was so quickly ruled out earlier, despite pretty consistent signs:
- pilot flew that exact route over the Indian Ocean on his simulator a month earlier
- tracking info was most likely turned off manually
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malaysia_Airlines_Flight_370#Murder/suicide_by_pilot

It will never be found

By denelson83 • Score: 3 Thread

The plane is in several million pieces scattered over several thousand square kilometres of potentially mountainous ocean floor, like what happened with SwissAir Flight 111, only in much deeper water.

Cory Doctorow’s Prescient Novella About Health Insurance and Murder

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Five years ago, journalist and sci-fi author Cory Doctorow published a short story that explored the radicalization of individuals denied healthcare coverage. As The Guardian notes in a recent article, the story “might seem eerily similar” to the recent shooting of UnitedHealthcare’s CEO. While it appears that the alleged shooter never read the story, Doctorow said: “I feel like the most important thing about that is that it tells you that this is not a unique insight.” Doctorow continued: “that the question that I had is a question other people have had.” As an activist in favor of liberalizing copyright laws and a proponent of the Creative Commons organization, it’s important to note that Doctorow advocates for systemic reform through collective action rather than violence. Here’s an excerpt from the The Guardian’s article:
In Radicalized, one of four novellas comprising a science fiction novel of the same name, Doctorow charts the journey of a man who joins an online forum for fathers whose partners or children have been denied healthcare coverage by their insurers after his wife is diagnosed with breast cancer and denied coverage for an experimental treatment. Slowly, over the course of the story, the men of the forum become radicalized by their grief and begin plotting — and executing — murders of health insurance executives and politicians who vote against universal healthcare.

In the wake of the December 4 shooting of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson, which unleashed a wave of outrage at the U.S. health system, Doctorow’s novella has been called prescient. When the American Prospect magazine republished the story last week, it wrote: “It is being republished with permission for reasons that will become clear if you read it.” But Doctorow doesn’t think he was on to something that no one else in the U.S. understood. […]

In one part of the story, a man whose young daughter died after an insurance company refused to pay for brain surgery bombs the insurer’s headquarters. “It’s not vengeance. I don’t have a vengeful bone in my body. Nothing I do will bring Lisa back, so why would I want revenge? This is a public service. There’s another dad just like me,” he shares in a video message on the forum. “And right now, that dad is talking to someone at Cigna, or Humana, or BlueCross BlueShield, and the person on the phone is telling that dad that his little girl has. To. Die. Someone in that building made the decision to kill my little girl, and everyone else in that building went along with it. Not one of them is innocent, and not one of them is afraid. They’re going to be afraid, after this.”

“Because they must know in their hearts,” he goes on. “Them, their lobbyists, the men in Congress who enabled them. They’re parents. They know. Anyone who hurt their precious children, they’d hunt that person down like a dog. The only amazing thing about any of this is that no one has done it yet. I’m going to make a prediction right now, that even though I’m the first, I sure as hell will not be the last. There’s more to come.”

Re:Luigi

By ArmoredDragon • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Is not a threat to me or anyone I know.

Anybody who can just walk up to somebody they’ve never met and shoot them in the back is probably not the kind of person you want loose on the street anywhere.

The state is even trying to use the death penalty

Federal government, and they haven’t decided.

and terrorism charges.

That one is the state, and this case does meet the legal definition of it in that state. So as a matter of law, it is correct.

They don’t even give that to people who shoot up schools or churches.

Depends on a few things:

1) Did they survive the incident? Often they don’t.
2) What was the legal definition of it in that jurisdiction?
3) Did their actions meet the legal definition?

They know how he’s dangerous to the ruling class and an example has to be made.

He’s dangerous to anybody, really. From what I can tell of the circumstances of this case, he wasn’t even denied care by an insurance company. He was denied care by the actual medical professionals. Doesn’t matter if this happened in Cuba, if the doctor doesn’t think it’s medically appropriate to perform the surgery he wanted, then it’s not going to happen. The guy could very well decide the doctors are your so called “ruling class” subject to arbitrary, summary exeution because at the end of the day, they have the final say on whether the surgery is performed.

And I don’t get why anybody thinks this is unique to the US. Back in 2008 I had surgery to correct a deviated septum. A good friend of mine who I went to community college with went on to become an actual doctor, and he practices in the UK. He told me that if I had been in the UK, they would have determined that surgery to be a waste and wouldn’t have done it. In his own opinion, it really wasn’t even worth bothering with. Is he right? *shrug* to be honest I didn’t notice much of a difference after the surgery. Either way, at the end of the day, resources are limited. Whether it’s a government or a private insurance company denying care, I don’t see what difference it makes. In my case, we have a private insurance company approving and covering the surgery with zero out of pocket cost for me, and if I had been in the UK it would have been the NHS denying coverage, in which case it would be 100% out of pocket.

I pray he gets a series of mistrials and the charges dropped.

The evidence against him is overwhelming, you’re going to need a lot more than thoughts and prayers.

Irregularities of the US Medical System

By silentbozo • Score: 5, Informative Thread

From the standpoint of most of the rest of the developed world, the US medical system is… weird.

TL;DR - we have doctors in places that make it easier to get high end medical care but much more difficult to get routine medical care, and a system that incentivizes people not to spend money, to the benefit of the insurer. The supply shortage is not getting better (due to the long lead time to training medical professionals), and there’s a lot of friction that makes it more advantageous to get paid more to do specialist care for the same amount of time worked, because the overhead involved makes it much harder and much less rewarding to do basic care, beyond the issue with paying back student loans.

———-

First, let us look at cost. The US has a reputation of having really good specialist care - so good that apparently well heeled people from other countries regularly come here to have cutting edge procedures done, or to do routine scans that are booked up in their home country.

“These hospitals and clinics are offering inbound medical tourism services to patients who come to the U.S. for higher quality than they can receive in their home country, access to procedures that are not available in their country’s healthcare facilities, freedom from long wait times or the rationing of procedures because of national governmental regulations, because of the ability to combine tourism opportunities in the U.S., and/or (believe it or not!) because the price differential- paying for services in cash in the U.S. may be less expensive than in their home country.”

https://www.magazine.medicalto…

“For many Canadians, the prospect of enduring prolonged wait times for medical imaging, such as MRI scans, prompts them to explore alternative avenues. This has led to a growing trend of Canadians venturing south of the border to the United States to secure expedited MRI appointments.”

https://www.cmimri.ca/navigati…

Paradoxically though, we have the opposite happening within the US, where some patients resort having procedures done overseas. We also have long lines in order to get seen by general practitioners. In other cases, US citizens forego basic care due to cost.

“Medical tourism is a worldwide, multibillion-dollar market that continues to grow with the rising globalization of health care. Surveillance data indicate that millions of US residents travel internationally for medical care each year. Medical tourism destinations for US residents include Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, the Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Germany, India, Malaysia, Mexico, Nicaragua, Peru, Singapore, and Thailand. Categories of procedures that US medical tourists pursue include cancer treatment, dental care, fertility treatments, organ and tissue transplantation, and various forms of surgery, including bariatric, cosmetic, and non-cosmetic (e.g., orthopedic).”

https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/travel/y…

“Opponents of universal health care often predict it would lead to long waits to see a doctor, but patients in the U.S. already face unacceptable delays in getting routine care.

Jam-packed appointment schedules have endured for years. Check out this Business Week story from 2007: “The Doctor Will See You—In Three Months.” However, the lack of a national reporting system to track and disclose wait times to the public — a feature in some other countries — has largely obscured the problem here.

With no comprehensive data, journalists rely on a hodgepodge of studies that suggest patients often wait a month or more for a slot on a doctor’s schedule.”

Pfft…

By quintessencesluglord • Score: 3 Thread

I was anticipating something like this with the 2008 crash.

People lose their life savings and only bankers are made whole? You’ll at least get 3 squares and a cot in prison (and free healthcare).

As long as law excessively favors business (arbitration, outright theft as “billing errors”, slap on the wrist penalties as the cost of doing business, etc.), people will make their own justice with the means available to them as there is no recourse coming from institutions.

Social contract violators

By sinij • Score: 3 Thread
Insurance industry under guidance of CEOs is very clearly violating social contracts by maliciously denying coverage to policy holders. Losing in court as a delay tactic is immoral and there should be personal consequences for people that decided to try it.

Re:Luigi

By Ly4 • Score: 4 Thread

This also happened in Manhattan that week:

Migrant teen killed, another injured, after being asked if they spoke English: New York police

https://abc7chicago.com/post/m…

Obviously this isn’t getting near the same level of effort as the CEO case.

‘Yes, I am a Human’: Bot Detection Is No Longer Working

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
The rise of AI has rendered traditional CAPTCHA tests increasingly ineffective, as bots can now "[solve] these puzzles in milliseconds using artificial intelligence (AI),” reports The Conversation. “How ironic. The tools designed to prove we’re human are now obstructing us more than the machines they’re supposed to be keeping at bay.” The report warns that the imminent arrival of AI agents — software programs designed to autonomously interact with websites on our behalf — will further complicate matters. From the report:
Developers are continually coming up with new ways to verify humans. Some systems, like Google’s ReCaptcha v3 (introduced in 2018), don’t ask you to solve puzzles anymore. Instead, they watch how you interact with a website. Do you move your cursor naturally? Do you type like a person? Humans have subtle, imperfect behaviors that bots still struggle to mimic. Not everyone likes ReCaptcha v3 because it raises privacy issues — plus the web company needs to assess user scores to determine who is a bot, and the bots can beat the system anyway. There are alternatives that use similar logic, such as "slider” puzzles that ask users to move jigsaw pieces around, but these too can be overcome.

Some websites are now turning to biometrics to verify humans, such as fingerprint scans or voice recognition, while face ID is also a possibility. Biometrics are harder for bots to fake, but they come with their own problems — privacy concerns, expensive tech and limited access for some users, say because they can’t afford the relevant smartphone or can’t speak because of a disability. The imminent arrival of AI agents will add another layer of complexity. It will mean we increasingly want bots to visit sites and do things on our behalf, so web companies will need to start distinguishing between “good” bots and “bad” bots. This area still needs a lot more consideration, but digital authentication certificates are proposed as one possible solution.

In sum, Captcha is no longer the simple, reliable tool it once was. AI has forced us to rethink how we verify people online, and it’s only going to get more challenging as these systems get smarter. Whatever becomes the next technological standard, it’s going to have to be easy to use for humans, but one step ahead of the bad actors. So the next time you find yourself clicking on blurry traffic lights and getting infuriated, remember you’re part of a bigger fight. The future of proving humanity is still being written, and the bots won’t be giving up any time soon.

Computers using computers

By GrahamJ • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

The idea of models browsing the web for us is hilarious. What we need is more effort to make online services interoperable via API, not LLMs pretending to be humans operating browsers. That’s just the most complicated Rube Goldberg machine ever.

Re:Computers using computers

By Tony Isaac • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

The challenge of APIs is that somebody has to build and maintain them. Many sites have no API at all, and many others have an API that is outdated and buggy. Most sites put their best effort into making their sites usable by humans, they don’t really care about API developers. Why should they? APIs don’t serve ads, and therefore don’t bring in income.

So while LLMs browsing the web might be inefficient, it allows people to use automation on websites that don’t bother to offer an API, and to do so without requiring writing client code.

There are different kinds of efficiency. The kind you would like to eliminate, is excess human-oriented baggage. But doing so creates another kind of inefficiency: the requirement that programmers write software to browse the web.

Captchas should die

By madbrain • Score: 4, Informative Thread

They are all huge problem for vision impaired. On one site, I made over 100 attempts, with different images. I couldn’t solve one of them. There was no audio option. No email to contact the site administrator. Any contact required signing up first. I tried to guess the admin email. Sent over a dozen emails. They all bounced. I was unable to join the site as a result. This was a few months ago. More recently, I tried again, and solved it on the first try.

I now always click on the audio option if there is one. Oftentimes, it doesn’t work in Firefox with ad blockers. The sites tell me there is suspicious aciltivity. Fortunately, my hearing loss is only in one ear, and minor, and so far I have always succeeded on the first try with voice challenges.

You can however have both visual and hearing impairments. A machine is always going to do better and faster in those cases.

My main browsing machine is a desktop which lacks any kind of biometrics. It does however have a webcam. Maybe some kind of real-time video challenge would work, with the site asking the user to do a particular gesture. The AI can fake video too, but perhaps not in real-time - yet.
And there are obviously huge privacy concerns with that.

Captchas have NEVER been “reliable”

By Arrogant-Bastard • Score: 3 Thread
“In sum, Captcha is no longer the simple, reliable tool it once was. "

To borrow an apocryphal line from (perhaps) Enrico Fermi: that is not even good enough to be wrong.

Captchas always were, and remain, an incredibly stupid idea, deployed exclusively by ignorant newbies who are both too stupid and too lazy to implement real security on their sites. Methods for defeating them emerged immediately and were improved faster than captchas themselves — not surprising, since attackers had first-mover advantage. Some of those methods were automated; some were manual; some were combinations. But what they all had in common is that they allowed attackers to defeat captchas at will. For example (and this is merely a sample) (and all of these links are over a decade old):

Captchas do have one purpose, though: they signal which companies/organizations have laughably incompetent CSOs.

EU Wants Apple To Open AirDrop and AirPlay To Android

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
The EU is pushing Apple to make iOS more interoperable with other platforms, requiring features like AirDrop and AirPlay to work seamlessly with Android and third-party devices, while also enabling background app functionality and cross-platform notifications. 9to5Google reports:
A new document released (PDF) by the European Commission this week reveals a number of ways the EU wants Apple to change iOS and its features to be more interoperable with other platforms. There are some changes to iOS itself, such as opening up notifications to work on third-party smartwatches as they do with the Apple Watch. Similarly, the EU wants Apple to let iOS apps work in the background as Apple’s first-party apps do, as this is a struggle of some apps, especially companion apps for accessories such as smartwatches (other than the Apple Watch, of course). But there are also some iOS features that the EU directly wants Apple to open up to other platforms, including Android. […]

As our sister site 9to5Mac points out, Apple has responded (PDF) to this EU document, prominently criticizing the EU for putting out a mandate that “could expose your private information.” Apple’s document primarily focuses in on Meta, which the company says has made “more interoperability requests” than anyone else. Apple says that opening AirPlay to Meta would "[create] a new class of privacy and security issues, while giving them data about users homes.” The EU is taking consultation on this case until January 9, 2025, and if Apple doesn’t comply when the order is eventually put into effect, it could result in heavy fines.

Just go the whole way, EU…

By ThosLives • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

EU, why not just go the whole way: declare every piece of of software must be usable on all hardware, and you can’t have such a thing as platform-specific hardware, nor can you have platform-specific communications protocols, and you can’t charge people for using those libraries/APIs/interfaces either because that would be “uncompetitive”.

So you can’t have Windows-only software, iOS-only software, Playstation-only software requiring Sony approval, Nintendo-only software, Tesla-only software, uh… Panasonic microwave-only software… and of course printer software (talk about gatekeeping!).... you can’t have APIs that are available only to paying customers but must make them open to everything…

And why make it limited to software? Every hardware part should be compatible with every other hardware part, with completely open specifications. NVIDIA must publish the low-level interface to their chips so anyone can write drivers for them; anyone should be allowed to see the tech specs for Infineon automotive chips…anyone should be allowed to write device drivers for the cell modems, etc. etc.

I mean this would not be so bad if the EU said “you have to at least offer them for sale, but you can charge for them.” But the EU seems to have this stance of “once a product is too popular, you’re not allowed to make money on it any more, and in fact you have to lose money on it by continuing to support it for all possible competitors, too.”

I just don’t understand why something like AirDrop / AirPlay can’t be a differentiator… why does it have to be open, when there are hundreds of other protocols that are open and are supported?

Mega-corporation but a victim

By NotEmmanuelGoldstein • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

… the EU wants Apple to change …

Is this like Google, where it wanted Apple to buy Google’s propriety messaging API.

.... third-party smartwatches …

If Apple doesn’t want compatibility with Google/Garmin/etc devices, they don’t have to. As long as Apple doesn’t restrict access to the API, as Microsoft did.

… other than the Apple Watch …

It looks like Apple is playing favourites.

Step too far

By bubblyceiling • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
I agree with EU on the anti-competitive nature of the Apple AppStore, but this is a step too far. If they want to force Apple to open up AirPlay & AirDrop, then Microsoft should be forced to open up NTFS, SMB, DirectoryAuth and all the various tech they use to keep people locked into their ecosystem. Google should also be similarly forced to open up the Gmail API and not restrict features like “Snooze” to their own apps.

Screw that

By rsilvergun • Score: 3 Thread
Open up the IM Network. That would break apples Monopoly wide open. I’m going to tell you right now that what locks people into iPhones is the IM client that replaces your SMS.

So?

By jenningsthecat • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Apple says that opening AirPlay to Meta would "[create] a new class of privacy and security issues, while giving them data about users homes.”

Give users granular control over permissions, teach them how to set those permissions, and warn them about the security and privacy dangers represented by third-party apps. Let them suffer the consequences of not heeding the warning. Now THAT would be a sign of real “courage”, so I guess Apple won’t go there.

Also, given that Apple sold its Chinese customers’ privacy to Winnie the Pooh, virtue-signalling about European customers’ privacy seems more than a little disingenuous.

10,000 Amazon Workers Go On Strike Ahead of Holiday Rush

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from PCMag:
Amazon employees are striking after the online retail giant missed a deadline to begin negotiations for a union contract. Roughly 10,000 employees have gone on strike as of Dec. 19. Workers are forming picket lines in New York City, Atlanta, Southern California, San Francisco, and Skokie, IL. Per a press release from the Teamsters, employees at other facilities have authorized strikes as well. Local unions are also putting up picket lines at hundreds of fulfillment centers nationwide, which could cause package delays ahead of the holidays.

“If your package is delayed during the holidays, you can blame Amazon’s insatiable greed. We gave Amazon a clear deadline to come to the table and do right by our members. They ignored it,” says Teamsters General President Sean M. O’Brien. “These greedy executives had every chance to show decency and respect for the people who make their obscene profits possible. Instead, they’ve pushed workers to the limit and now they’re paying the price. This strike is on them.”

The Teamsters say this is “the largest strike against Amazon in US history.” Amazon tells CBS News it doesn’t expect it to impact its operations; the company employs 1.5 million people in its warehouses and corporate offices. The workers claim that Amazon has engaged in illegal anti-union behavior while failing to provide employees with better pay and better working conditions. “They talk a big game about taking care of their workers, but when it comes down to it, Amazon does not respect us and our right to negotiate for better working conditions and wages,” said Gabriel Irizarry, a driver at DIL7 in Skokie, IL. “We can’t even afford to pay our bills.”
For its part, Amazon claims the Teamsters have “continued to intentionally mislead the public” about the situation.
An Amazon spokesperson told NBC News: “The truth is that Teamsters have actively threatened, intimidated, and attempted to coerce Amazon employees and third-party drivers to join them, which is illegal and is the subject of multiple pending unfair labor practice charges against the union.”

You can read the Teamster’s press release here.

Re:Nice delivery business you got there

By ClickOnThis • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Time was, commie sympathizing sabotage was illegal and the domain the law enforcement, not fawning media coverage.

A legal strike (which is what the Amazon workers are on) is not “commie sympathizing sabotage.” It’s a First Amendment right.

Overall wages and wealth were going up in those days, rather than stagnating.

Because unions helped them to go up?

Justice Department Unveils Charges Against Alleged LockBit Developer

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
The U.S. Department of Justice has charged Russian-Israeli national, Rostislav Panev, for his alleged role as a developer in the LockBit ransomware group, accused of designing malware and maintaining infrastructure for attacks that extorted over $500 million and caused billions in global damages. CyberScoop reports:
The arrest is part of a broader campaign by international law enforcement agencies to dismantle LockBit. In February, a coordinated operation led by the U.K.‘s National Crime Agency in cooperation with the FBI and the U.S. Justice Department disrupted LockBit’s infrastructure, seizing websites and servers critical to its operations. These efforts significantly curtailed the group’s ability to launch further attacks and extort victims.

Panev is one of several individuals charged in connection with LockBit. Alongside him, other key figures have been indicted, including Dmitry Khoroshev, alleged to be “LockBitSupp,” the group’s primary creator and administrator. Khoroshev, still at large, is accused of developing the ransomware and coordinating attacks on an international scale. The State Department has offered a reward of up to $10 million for his capture.

Meanwhile, numerous members linked to LockBit remain fugitives, such as Russian nationals Artur Sungatov and Ivan Kondratyev, each facing charges for deploying ransomware against multiple industries globally. Mikhail Matveev, another alleged LockBit affiliate, is also at large, with a $10 million reward for his capture. Matveev was recently charged with computer crimes in Russia.
You can read the full criminal complaint against Panev here (PDF).

Qualcomm Processors Properly Licensed From Arm, US Jury Finds

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Jurors delivered a mixed verdict on Friday, ruling that Qualcomm had properly licensed its central processor chips from Arm. This decision effectively concludes Arm’s lawsuit against Qualcomm, which had the potential to disrupt the global smartphone and PC chip markets.

The dispute stemmed from Qualcomm’s $1.4 billion acquisition of chip startup Nuvia in 2021. Arm claimed Qualcomm breached contract terms by using Nuvia’s designs without permission, while Qualcomm maintained its existing agreement covers the acquired technology. Arm demanded Qualcomm destroy the Nuvia designs created before the acquisition. Reuters reports:
An eight-person jury in U.S. federal court deadlocked on the question of whether Nuvia, a startup that Qualcomm purchased for $1.4 billion in 2021, breached the terms of its license with Arm. But the jury found that Qualcomm did not breach Nuvia’s license with Arm.

The jury also found that Qualcomm’s chips created using Nuvia technology, which have been central to Qualcomm’s push into the personal computer market, are properly licensed under its own agreement with Arm, clearing the way for Qualcomm to continue selling them.

One moron down

By locater16 • Score: 3 Thread
One moronic CEO brought on to squeeze money out of a tech company by destroying the customer base brought low, thousands more to go…

The writing’s on the wall

By Guspaz • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Qualcomm’s license can only be renewed through 2033 without ARM’s agreement, which means that if ARM wants to, they can legally cut off Qualcomm’s license at that point. If I were Qualcomm, I’d be working mighty hard to migrate to another instruction set by then, or at least a fallback plan in case license renegotiations fall through.

I guess RISCV is the only actual viable alternative, so Qualcomm would need to dump a significant amount of resources into pushing the state of Android’s RISCV support forward over the next nine years.

Arizona’s Getting an Online Charter School Taught Entirely By AI

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from TechCrunch:
The newest online-only school greenlighted (PDF) by the Arizona State Board for Charter Schools comes with a twist: The academic curriculum will be taught entirely by AI. Charter schools — independently operated but publicly funded — typically get greater autonomy compared to traditional public schools when it comes to how subjects are taught. But Unbound Academy’s application, which proposes an “AI-driven adaptive learning technology” that “condenses academic instruction into a two-hour window,” is a first for the model. (Unbound’s founders have been running a similar program at a “high-end private school” in Texas, which appears to be in-person.)

Unbound’s approach leans on edtech platforms like IXL and Khan Academy, and students engage with “interactive, AI-powered platforms that continuously adjust to their individual learning pace and style.” There will be humans, just fewer of them, and maybe not actual accredited teachers: It will adopt a “human-in-the-loop” approach with “skilled guides” monitoring progress who can provide “targeted interventions” and coaching for each student. Academic instruction is whittled down to just two hours. The remainder of the students’ day will include “life-skills workshops” covering areas such as critical thinking, creative problem-solving, financial literacy, public speaking, goal setting, and entrepreneurship. The online-only school targets students from fourth to eighth grades.

Our education system continues to devolve

By darth_borehd • Score: 3 Thread

Our education system continues to devolve into a dystopian nightmare. It’s going to get worse in the next few years before it ever gets better. :(

This sounds like a scam

By rsilvergun • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
No parent in their right mind and few in there wrong minds would subject their kid to this.

There appears to be very little oversight over how public money is spent on private schooling in Arizona at the moment. It’s so bad that they have a huge budget deficit. This is very much by design. From what I can tell the previous Republican governor Left this as a time bomb for the incoming Democrat governor.

Right now 95% of the public money going to private schools is going to wealthy students who were already going to private schools. It’s basically just free money and a subsidy to the richest people in the state.

Eventually the hole in the budget combined with how obviously corrupt it is will catch up and the voters will shut it down but in the meantime it looks like several billion dollars is going to get handed to a bunch of rich people. And a bunch of public schools are going to get closed down for lack of funding.

Re:weirdos

By Rosco P. Coltrane • Score: 4, Funny Thread

Most likely you’ll end up with a bunch of super-verbose, overly polite kids routinely lying and making shit up when they don’t know what to say.

Re:This sounds like a scam

By Darinbob • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

What’s what most of the active home schooling lobbyists want. This push by lobbyists was NEVER about better education, instead it’s about subsidizing expensive private schools and dismantling accessible public schools. You think the politicians and lobbyists care about the kids? If the poor kids lose out then that’s their fault for being poor.

Re:If it works…

By RossCWilliams • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Decisions are never based on evidence. Evidence and reason can inform a decision, but it isn’t the basis for it. Decisions are based on the values that give weight to any evidence available. They are fundamentally irrational acts of faith. Which is why presented with the same evidence people will make different decisions. Its also the danger of the whole AI idea which assumes a logical machine can replace human judgment. Or should.

AI isn’t going to train people to make judgements based on their own values. Instead AI will fill them up with the “right” answers to its limited ability and they will never learn to make a decision of their own, entirely dependent on AI instead. A true dystopia.

CFPB Sues America’s Largest Banks For ‘Allowing Fraud To Fester’ on Zelle

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is suing America’s three largest banks, accusing the institutions of failing to protect customers from fraud on Zelle, the payment platform they co-own. From a report:
According to the suit, which also targets Early Warning Services LLC, Zelle’s official operator, Zelle users have lost more than $870 million over the network’s seven-year existence due to these alleged failures. “The nation’s largest banks felt threatened by competing payment apps, so they rushed to put out Zelle,” said CFPB Director Rohit Chopra in a statement. “By their failing to put in place proper safeguards, Zelle became a gold mine for fraudsters, while often leaving victims to fend for themselves.”

Among the charges:
1. Poor identity verification methods, which have allowed bad actors to quickly create accounts and target Zelle users.
2. Allowing repeat offenders to continue to gain access to the platform
3. Ignoring and failing to report instances of fraud
4. Failing to properly investigate consumer complaints

The CFPB’s suit seeks to change the platform’s operations, as well as obtain a civil money penalty, that would be paid into the CFPB’s victims relief fund.

Have no fear

By smooth wombat • Score: 4, Funny Thread

Once Musk comes into office this ridiculous agency will be done away with. After all, why should the government be responsible for protecting you from fraud? That’s the job of private industry.

It’s the same reason the requirement car manufacturers have to report accidents when their automated driving software was activated 30 seconds before impact will go away once Musk is in office. There’s no need for the public to know this information. Only the car manufacturers need to know and choose whether to let you know of any safety issues.

And meanwhile…

By MpVpRb • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

…my wife has had nothing but trouble trying to send money to her daughter.
I make machines for glasswork and customers report difficulty when trying to pay.
It seems that legitimate users constantly face roadblocks while scammers run free

Only use Zelle with people you know…

By sarren1901 • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

I literally only use Zelle with people I actually know. The idea of using it online to pay someone I don’t know or to buy stuff with never remotely entered my mind. That’s what credit cards are for.

Zelle is super useful if you want to send your friend $20 for gas but don’t want to have to first go get the money and then drive it to your friend. May as well just get the gas and take that over. No thanks on either scenario when I can just Zelle my friend the $20 and be done with it.

If you are getting defrauded with Zelle, maybe stop using it for everything under the sun.

It doesn’t surprise me that some folks want Zelle gone. Before Zelle, it actually cost me money to send someone money. No thanks.

Re: Have no fear

By Darinbob • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Correction, he’ll fix everything on DAY ONE. So we don’t need to actually worry until day two.

Re:It wasn’t fraud, but bad news for the payer…

By Tony Isaac • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Were the notifications actually from Zelle, or were they only purporting to be from Zelle? If you didn’t actually receive payments, it’s hard to tell if the emails were just spoofed.

Apple Pulls Lightning-Equipped iPhones From Swiss Stores Ahead of EU USB-C Mandate

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
Apple has started pulling its iPhone SE and iPhone 14 models from sale in Switzerland, signaling broader discontinuation across the European Union ahead of new USB-C charging requirements taking effect December 28.

The devices, which use Apple’s proprietary Lightning port, disappeared from Swiss online stores today. Switzerland, while not an EU member, follows EU market rules. Apple-authorized resellers can continue selling existing stock until depleted. A new USB-C compatible iPhone SE is expected in March.

USB requirement, not USB-C

By swillden • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Note that the EU is not requiring Apple to use USB-C, that sort of regulation would create a permanent lock-in to what may be a great connector now but might be superseded by improved options in the future. Instead, the EU is requiring the use of a USB standard. The USB-IF has a great track record of developing and standardizing improved technologies as the needs and capabilities of the industry change, and if Apple finds that none of the USB-approved standards fit their needs, they’ll be able to propose new designs for standardization. Of course, if they come up with something really great and standardize it, they won’t be able to prevent others from using it.

I’m generally opposed to government regulation that might block innovation, but I think the EU’s approach here strikes a good balance between preventing vendor proprietary lock-in (and the resulting proliferation of connectors) and the freedom to innovate and improve. The goodness of this balance depends heavily on USB-IF continuing to be a well-functioning standards body, of course, but they have a good track record and I see no reason to expect that to change.

I think the EU did a similarly good job with mandating GSMA-approved standards for cellular communications and banning carrier lock-in (technological or contractual). This resulted in better, faster, cheaper cellular communications technology in the EU as compared with the US. GSMA innovated and improved GSM over the years, but the requirement that everyone use a GSMA-approved standard kept all the carriers competing on a level field.

Re:I think it’s funny

By test321 • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Everything says the contrary
1. If Apple thought these devices were not profitable, they would not have marketed them in EU in the first place
2. If Apple was looking to remove these older products from the shops, they would not wait until the last possible day, and they would certainly would not wait until after Christmas purchases. They would have removed them last month, such that people would have to buy the “iphone 27 pro max ultra” this Christmas! TFA says they will remove these phones from sale in EU on Dec 28 (the last possible day; and after Christmas). For some reason they removed them one week ahead in Switzerland (maybe as a test to collect feedback on a smaller market before they do the same in the big one).
3. Finally, according to the summary, Apple will market new variants of the low-cost devices that are compliant, which is also difficult to conciliate with your hypothesis that Apple would use the new regulation as an excuse to not sell the low-cost variants.

Michael Dell Says Adoption of AI PCs is ‘Definitely Delayed’

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
Dell CEO Michael Dell has acknowledged delays in corporate adoption of AI-enabled PCs but remains confident in their eventual widespread uptake, citing his four decades of industry experience with technology transitions.

The PC maker’s chief executive told Fortune that while the current refresh cycle is “definitely delayed,” adoption is inevitable once sufficient features drive customer demand. Meanwhile, Dell’s infrastructure division saw 80% revenue growth last quarter from AI-server sales. The company is supplying servers for xAI’s Colossus supercomputer project in Memphis and sees opportunities in “sovereign AI” systems for nations seeking technological independence. “Pick a country ranked by GDP, the [top] 49 other than the U.S., they all need one,” Dell said.

Barely a prediction…

By fuzzyfuzzyfungus • Score: 3 Thread
It seems almost meaningless to talk ‘eventual’ uptake when the relevant hardware has been added to more or less all current laptop CPUs, without there being NPU-less variants that cost less, so basically anyone who buys a new laptop in the future will, technically, be ‘adopting an AI PC’.

Delayed for very good reason

By BishopBerkeley • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
They’re not intelligent! Unlikely they ever will be.

Circular reasoning

By sacrilicious • Score: 3 Thread

adoption is inevitable once sufficient features drive customer demand

This is a classic example of circular reasoning. In other news, hunger will disappear once food production and distribution issues are adequately remedied.

What will an AI PC do for the user?

By ctilsie242 • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Other than being a great point to take telemetry and metadata gleaned from the end user, perhaps stuff from MS Recall, and process it on site for maximum value to sell off, what does having AI capabilities do for the end user? Having hardware for array flipping may be useful, but for most things, it is general CPU, RAM, and storage that is important. For example, something similar to Intel Optane which can give faster access from SSD to RAM would be more useful for many users than more array multiplication power.

Or maybe something like having smarter components on the motherboard. Jettison Intel FakeRAID and put in a real, hardware RAID chipset with a capacitor or battery cache, so stuff can be fetched at DRAM speeds, and the disk I/O is separate from the OS. Maybe even add a way to back up stuff via snapshots on the disk layer, which can give ransomware-resistance at that level.

Maybe even work with Microsoft to add better virtualization with Hyper-V always on, and a built in easy way to swap between VMs, so one could be on an instance doing work, but easily swap to a gaming instance, where neither instance knows about each other, or that there are any other instances but themselves. This way, the more intrusive DRM from AAA games can sit in its own little playground, while one can do other work without worrying about crashes and other bad stuff caused by it.

If they want to do new silicon, perhaps look at PUFs, as a way for securing data without needing to store keys.

What people want is something that isn’t dog slow, is private, decently secure, and does what they want. AI, or stuff that helps the ad companies isn’t really on anyone’s list.

AI numbers will increase…

By sarren1901 • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

When the only pre-made computers you can buy all come with AI, everyone will start having AI enabled computers. If we’re lucky, us pc builders will still have access to non-AI pc components but for how long, I can’t speculate.

We’re About To Fly a Spacecraft Into the Sun For the First Time

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
NASA’s Parker Solar Probe will make its closest approach yet to the Sun on Christmas Eve, flying within 3.8 million miles of the solar surface and entering its atmosphere for the first time.

The spacecraft, which travels at speeds up to 430,000 miles per hour, aims to study the origins of solar wind — the stream of charged particles emanating from the Sun’s corona. The probe’s heat shield will endure temperatures exceeding 2,500-degree Fahrenheit during the flyby, requiring specialized materials like sapphire crystal tubes and niobium wiring to protect its instruments.

“Houston, there is a Santa Claus”

By Thud457 • Score: 4, Funny Thread
I hope they’re going at night.

First time?

By necro81 • Score: 4, Informative Thread
The Parker Solar Probe has been flying through the sun’s corona since at least 2021.

Yes, it’s getting closer to the sun this time than it (or any other spacecraft) ever has before (it did it’s final Venus flyby on Nov 6). The story is cool enough that it doesn’t need made up “firsts”.

Old joke comes to mind

By Stormwatch • Score: 3 Thread

In the 1960s, America landed a man on the Moon.
Not to be outdone, Poland announced a mission to land a man on the Sun.
“But the Sun is too hot!”
So they replied: “That is no problem, we will land at night.

Douglas Adams foresaw this

By drainbramage • Score: 3 Thread

Disaster Area are a plutonium rock band fronted by Hotblack Desiato from the Gagrakacka Mind Zones…
As a finale they fly their spaceship into a sun as a special effect for the concert.
Adams was a Pink Floyd fan, this refers to the song ‘Set The Controls For The Heart Of The Sun’

Easier to leave the solar system than reach sun

By caseih • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

It’s quite fascinating how orbital mechanics work. The Parker probe is making close approaches at high speed to the sun because it’s actually really difficult to actually attain a circular orbit relatively close to the sun without spending a ton of energy to reduce the velocity that Earth’s orbit imparts on all spacecraft leaving this planet. In fact it would be very difficult to send a probe to land on, say Mercury, due to the delta V involved (and thus energy required). If we wanted to send something into the sun to burn up, that would be really hard and take a tremendous amount of energy. Makes me laugh how many sci fi stories revolve around nearly falling, or falling, into the sun.

For now we’ll satisfy ourselves with flybys that use the other planets to help reduce the energy requirements.

Why Online Returns Are a Hassle Now

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot
U.S. retailers are cracking down on free returns as costs spiral out of control, The Atlantic reports. Return rates have more than doubled since 2019, with shoppers expected to send back nearly $900 billion in merchandise this year.

Major chains like REI and JCPenney are now charging fees or requiring in-store drop-offs, abandoning years of customer-friendly policies. With each $100 return costing stores up to $30 to process, some retailers have given up entirely — telling customers to keep cheap items rather than send them back.

I get it

By MBGMorden • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Honestly sometimes reading reviews I totally get why they’d make it more difficult. If I buy something and it arrives damaged or not working, then obviously that’s a return. Clothing if it doesn’t fit, sure.

That said, I’ve read some forum posts or reviews for something in binoculars where the person is sayings things like “I bought 3 pairs and tried them out and then sent back the 2 I didn’t like.”. Or “I didn’t like this one feature about an item - sending it back.”

The return policy shouldn’t be a way to test drive products that you may or may not keep. It should be reserved for when something is obviously faulty, misrepresented, etc. If I don’t do my research and end up buying something I don’t like but its functioning exactly the way its intended to, then that’s on me.

Re:I do not get that

By Daemonik • Score: 4, Informative Thread

I bought a 3D printer from Amazon once, spent $800 on it. I got a box filled with obviously used parts and no packing material. This was entirely on Amazon and their policy of being a storefront for 3rd parties, not the fact that I wanted a 3D printer.

You better believe I made them take it back, at their cost. Maybe be less of a corporate shill and realize the customer wanting their actual advertised product delivered undamaged is not unreasonable. The corporation should have insurance covering their sales in case of a return if it’s so problematic.

Re:I get it

By MBGMorden • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Negative. This is a very major reason Amazon is so popular… if you don’t want it, it goes back. If they stop doing that, then me and whole lot of other people will just not shop there anymore, and let our Prime membership lapse.

That’s your choice, and I’m happy to stop subsidizing your poor shopping practices as we all pay higher prices from that type of behavior.

Do your research on stuff before you decide to purchase it. Read or watch reviews. Then decide whether or not you want this product - BEFORE YOU BUY IT. Return it if it doesn’t work right or something is wrong (eg, if you ordered a red item but a blue one arrived), but if you just decide you don’t like it, then you made a poorly researched purchase and that’s on you.

Re:I get it

By smooth wombat • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Why not do a test drive with binoculars (or whatever)? One type might feel better in your hand or up against your eyes than another. One is lighter than the other. Maybe one has a sharper image.

This is why brick and mortar stores are so important. You can go to the place, examine the item in your hand, do a test drive, and make a decision. You buy it and go home knowing it’s what you want and that it’s working. Rather than, as you indicated, buying 3 different items, waiting for them to be delivered, opening each one, trying each one, making a decision, boxing up the ones you don’t want, notifying the company which ones you are returning so you get your money back, then finally taking the boxes to be returned.

How many days did you waste ordering online compared to an hour or so at a store?

Re:Maybe they could…

By NaCh0 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Certain people are buying dozens of pieces at a time and using the e-commerce returns system as a virtual dressing room.

The mindset of the people who do this can’t be fixed. Firing them as a customer is the best policy.

As an e-commerce seller in the electronics segment, I see these chronic returners in the UPS store all the time.