Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Slovakia Finds Russian Backdoor In Traffic Speed Cameras
  2. Stanford Economist Now Believes an AI Job Apocalypse Is Unlikely
  3. 23 Years After SimCity 4’s Release, ‘Eternal Commuter’ Bug Finally Fixed
  4. Canonical is Funding a PhD to Automate C to Rust Translation
  5. Supply Chain Issues Delaying US Grid Batteries’ Installation
  6. Debian is Voting on Whether to Allow AI-Assisted Contributions
  7. Defamation Suit Demanding Elsevier Retract Paper Heads Closer To Trial
  8. Microsoft Blames Windows Gaming Issues On RGB Lighting Devices
  9. Battery Fires At Recycling Centres Are Costing the UK £1bn a Year
  10. How Will AI Change the Field of Mathematics?
  11. Rush Rescue Mission for NASA’s $500M Space Telescope Fails
  12. Flock is Secretly Building a Powerful New Prompt-Based AI Tool for Police
  13. Low Emission Zone Led To Better Lung Size, Function Among London Children
  14. Moderna-Merck Vaccine Cuts Recurrence And Spread of Melanoma, Raises New Treatment Hope
  15. Is AI Really to Blame for High Unemployment Among Recent Graduates? What Economists Say

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Slovakia Finds Russian Backdoor In Traffic Speed Cameras

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Slovakia acquired speed cameras to modernize its traffic control— but there was a surprise. Tom’s Hardware cites this story from the Risky Bulletin Newsletter:
Unfortunately, the country’s national security service, the NBU, has discovered that the cameras have multiple security issues. Firstly, they have SMS-activated Russian backdoors. Secondly, live camera feeds can be accessed by anyone with the device IP, no password necessary…

[The cameras] are thought to be rebranded Russian CORDON PRO.M traffic cameras, produced by a St. Petersburg-based firm called Semicon… reportedly bought via a Cyprus-based shell company with fake certifications. Reports also suggest that pressure from the opposition political party in Slovakia led to the NBU investigations… Probably most seriously, in terms of national security, these cameras contain a hardcoded list of Russian phone numbers, which can be used to open a backdoor. An SMS from one of these numbers can open shell and network access… [T]he SecureBoot feature is ineffective, and the web management portal can be accessed, exposing live streams, by anyone with the camera IP.

Cameras that have been installed and set up have since been deactivated by the Slovak Ministry of the Interior. Meanwhile, for due diligence, an independent auditor will be called in to confirm the NBU’s findings. It is thought that Croatia, and some other countries in Eastern Europe, may have undiscovered issues with traffic control cameras of similar origin.

Stanford Economist Now Believes an AI Job Apocalypse Is Unlikely

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“There is still no sign of economy-wide job destruction,” says economist Erik Brynjolfsson. Working with researchers at the Stanford Digital Economy Lab, Brynjolfsson has determined an AI “job apocalypse” is unlikely, reports the Washington Post, “even though it will likely impact entry-level jobs.”

And Brynjolfsson “predicts that demand for experienced workers such as senior coders will still be high even if AI takes on more routine knowledge and coding work in the future.”
Earlier this month, Brynjolfsson and his colleagues at the Stanford Digital Economy Lab updated their widely publicized report, "Canaries in the Coal Mine? Six Facts about the Recent Employment Effects of Artificial Intelligence,” to reflect that they do not see widespread, economy-wide job displacement associated with AI…

Brynjolfsson: What has moved on the upside is productivity. Nonfarm business productivity growth is running over 2 percent, the best sustained stretch since the late-1990s boom… The gains show up years after the investment, and they’re starting to show up… By 2030, we will have enormously more capable AI, meaningfully faster productivity growth and an unemployment rate that looks unremarkable — somewhere in its historical range. That surprises people, but it’s what the mechanism implies… [T]he technology is becoming much more powerful, and it’s going to be even more powerful.

Secondly, there are huge implications for business and the economy, including some increases in living standards, but also, potentially, job disruption. And then, thirdly, we must act now to address this gap. We can’t just sit back and wait for the tsunami to hit us. And one of the things we can do is put in place institutions, policies and research to make the technology more complementary — using AI to complement people so it creates more jobs. A common misconception among business managers is AI, in order to be effective, has to reduce jobs. That’s just not true. You can use AI to increase employment and productivity at the same time. It’s kind of a win-win…

Right now, tax policy is very skewed toward favoring capital versus labor — and, as a consequence, a lot of entrepreneurs and managers, they’re basically being guided by the federal government to replace workers with machines. And I don’t think that’s necessarily what we’d like to have happen. From an economist’s perspective, what you want to be doing is not mimicking and replacing things. You want to be extending and complementing — have humans do new things they never could have done before.
He acknowledges “real, persistent and widening” effects on entry-level jobs, with a labor market "closing the on-ramp for people starting their careers… If companies don’t hire people at the base of the pyramid, then they’re not going to have those people later when they need them.”

One he points out that one company is instead using AI to speed up its training of young employees.

America’s lack of nuance is pissing me off

By rsilvergun • Score: 3, Interesting Thread
The inability for America to comprehend nuance is starting to really piss me off.

Yeah we’re not all immediately going to lose our jobs.

That’s not the problem. The problem is we already are in a scenario where we have two good jobs for every five people. A good job here is something that lets you afford a one-bedroom apartment by yourself in a city that consistently has employment.

Oh here is where a bunch of people dig up lower cost apartments and places with little or no economic activity or job opportunities… Because every time I point out the reality of the economy somebody suddenly digs up a statistic out of context to prove what we all see with our own two fucking eyes isn’t real because gas lighting is a thing. Also the president is a pedophile and they voted for him and they would really like to forget about that…

Anyway getting back on track, a small reduction in the number of available jobs that pay people enough to be functioning adults will have a huge impact on our consumer-based economy. Already the only people in the economy who have any disposable income to speak of or the baby boomers who got all the socialism from the New deal and the Great society before pulling the ladder up behind them because Ronald Reagan is so fucking awesome and Orange temu Ronald Reagan is even more awesome.

We have a major crisis coming in addition to all the others like the water shortages and the AI data centers driving up the cost of electricity and everything else and the fact that we’ve given so much money to the 1% that we can no longer function as a country…

In addition to all of that when the baby boomers die in a few years there isn’t going to be enough jobs that pay enough to have disposable income to drive our economy or even our tax base. We’re going to have to start cutting police and fire. And it’s going to be a lot of desperate jobless young men showing up at your door armed to the teeth because we may not have food and shelter and medicine but by God we’ve got guns. All of us have guns. Including those desperate young men you abandoned because fuck those guys right? Bootstraps and something.

It doesn’t take very many job losses from automation when we have already had 50 years of non-stop automation devouring jobs that nobody likes to talk about. Go Google the phrase 70% of middle class jobs lost to automation since 1980 and you can find the study assuming your Google isn’t broken. For some reason every time I point all this out a bunch of people whose Google is broken ask for sources.

And this is why I hate americans. It has to either be every single one of us loses our job immediately tomorrow to a robot we all die in the streets or nobody loses our jobs and we don’t have to think about anything on any of the complex interactions between gradual job losses due to automation and the inability to feed a consumer-based economy.

It’s like how morons keep asking who is going to buy their products if we none of us have jobs. They don’t want to sell us products they want us to go away and die so that they can have everything for themselves. They hate you and they want you to die. It’s like none of you people saw the utter disdain and disgust in mitt Romney’s face every time he interact it with regular people on the campaign trail back then.

Then again the current president is pretty good at hiding his contempt for you and when he lets it show like when he called the people in the army suckers the news media just moves on and pretends it didn’t happen so…

It’s frustrating cuz I’m sitting here trapped on this fucking train with all you morons and I can see the other train coming at us and I’m like hey guys maybe we should do something about that and everybody’s like it’s not going fast enough so it’s fine. Then again there’s also a bit of I got mine fuck you from all the old farts floating around here who think they’re going to die before the shit hits the fan. And you absolutely do not beli

23 Years After SimCity 4’s Release, ‘Eternal Commuter’ Bug Finally Fixed

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“It began life just a year after SimCity 4’s 2003 launch,” writes the blog PCGamesN. “Now, over 20 years later, it’s still going strong with the arrival of Network Addon Mod update 50.”
The SimCity 4 Network Addon Mod, or simply ‘NAM’ among the community, has long been a de facto recommendation to anyone looking to pick up the classic city builder. It’s a comprehensive overhaul to the game’s transportation and infrastructure networks that combines key fixes with a vast set of additional build pieces such as overpasses, intersections, on-ramps, roundabouts, and so on.... [Y]ou’ll be able to place down elements adjacent to one another that might previously have needed a one-tile gap between them. Streets can be dragged diagonally, slope tolerances have been improved, and you can build tunnels with the street network.

The new version also includes a fix for the ‘Eternal Commuter Loop’ bug, which might sound fairly innocuous if you’re not deep in the weeds. In actuality, it’s a 23-year-long frustration that has plagued modders ever since launch. Essentially, it’s a problem with the regional pathfinding across city boundaries in certain layouts, causing your Sims to bounce from location to location in search of work without actually taking up a job in any of them. Your zone demand is ruined, traffic builds to unsustainable levels, and the economy falls to pieces before your very eyes. Until now, the only real solution was to simply avoid building layouts that gave your commuters the chance to loop between locations. Now, by blocking specific neighbor-to-neighbor routes while allowing the rest to run as normal, the problem has been resolved…

Equally impressively, the mandatory implementation of the DLL has reduced the size of the NAM codebase “by almost 90% and by more than ten million lines, making it easier to maintain and reducing the chance of bugs.”
Thanks to long-time Slashdot reader Striek for sharing the news.

Canonical is Funding a PhD to Automate C to Rust Translation

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader shared this report from the blog It’s FOSS:
Canonical has committed funding to a three-year PhD project focused on building a system that can automatically translate large C codebases into Rust. And they are not alone; UK Research and Innovation is matching their funding for the project, which is set to run through the University of Bristol’s Programming Languages Research Group.

The PhD is aiming to build an all-encompassing platform that can take a C repository running into hundreds of thousands of lines and translate it into Rust that’s "safe, behaviourally correct and maintainable Rust.”

The work will be carried out by a student, Alex Wood, who will be supported by Professor Meng Wang leading the work, with Dr. Cristina David and Canonical’s Jon Seager serving as co-supervisors.

How is that even possible?

By dskoll • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

If the C code does something unsafe, how can it be machine-translated into safe Rust, without knowing the intention of the programmer?

And even is this is possible, what’s the point? Why not just make a C compiler that emits “safe” assembler directly? It’s not as if a transpiler is likely to emit human-maintainable code.

I know Canonical is all hot for Rust, but this particular project doesn’t seem feasible to me.

don’t get it

By fluffernutter • Score: 3 Thread
Why not just use the time to make a safe c library of operations and use it?

We’re already doing this

By daveschroeder • Score: 3 Thread

https://www.cs.wisc.edu/2025/0…

And DARPA has a whole program for it:

https://www.darpa.mil/research…

Supply Chain Issues Delaying US Grid Batteries’ Installation

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Falling prices have made grid-scale storage batteries more attractive, reports Bloomberg. But after decades of stagnant investment, America’s grids “are racing to make the upgrades needed to plug them in,” with supplies straining for the necessary equipment.
Demand for batteries has skyrocketed as electricity use across the U.S. swells, driven by data centers’ booming energy needs and increasing electrification. It’s also getting harder to get them connected to power grids… As those upgrades get delayed, storage projects are piling up in interconnection queues from coast to coast. For example, Consolidated Edison Inc., a major utility in New York state, says over the last two years the volume of battery storage projects waiting to be connected has grown by 300%… “The whole process of interconnecting these new power plants got really log-jammed and bottlenecked,” said Joseph Rand, an energy policy researcher at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory…

Nationwide, some 750 gigawatts of energy storage projects — roughly equivalent to the generating capacity of more than 700 nuclear reactors — are in line to get grid connections, according to the lab’s research. Not all of these projects will get built. Many developers already abandoned the queue because of delays. Still, the waiting time is increasing; the median was five years in 2025, up from a year and a half in 2015. The flood of battery projects is expected to continue. Wood Mackenzie, an energy consultancy, projects the U.S. energy storage market will quadruple in the next six years…

[Shortages in key equipment] have driven up construction costs and time lines for grid upgrades, leaving utilities struggling to build fast enough. A drought of skilled workers is further slowing them down… In California, PG&E Corp., the state’s largest utility, told regulators in January that a key driver of delays was long lead times for specialized equipment. Procuring certain breakers could take nearly four years, according to the utility, which reported a 300% increase in its interconnection workload compared to prior years. In Northern California, for example, holdups to circuit breaker upgrades to a substation in Solano County led to projected delays for two battery projects worth a combined 450 megawatts. Transmission line work in the Bay Area has put another 800 megawatts of energy storage at risk of delay, according to PG&E.
Last year New York’s Con Ed started requiring developers to help pay for upgrades if their projects will push power demand and strain infrastructure. But that also drew criticism:
According to a survey conducted by the trade group New York Battery and Energy Storage Technology Consortium (NY-BEST), the new methodology raised costs by an average of $21 million per project, a 14-fold increase. At least 25 projects have been canceled as a result, according to the group. Battery advocates have appealed to state regulators to get Con Ed to abandon the new policy.
Thanks to Slashdot reader Bruce66423 for sharing the news.

Wrong conclusion.

By Gravis Zero • Score: 3 Thread

A drought of skilled workers is further slowing them down…

Given that we live in a “market-driven” society, the correct conclusion is that companies are refusing to properly compensate skilled workers. As for the cause, the only rational conclusion is that there is insufficient competition in the energy distribution market. To encourage competition, the correct move would be to start breaking up large energy distribution companies like PG&E.

Debian is Voting on Whether to Allow AI-Assisted Contributions

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Debian developers are voting on whether to ban AI-assisted contributions, reports the blog Linuxiac, with a ballot listing eight proposals and a “None of the above” option.
The first one is still the original proposal to ban LLM-assisted contributions by changing the Debian Social Contract. This would stop generative AI from being used for direct Debian work like packaging, software, documentation, translations, websites, and project communication. However, upstream projects made with AI help would not be affected. The proposal gives several reasons for the ban, such as unclear copyright and licensing, doubts about the reliability of AI-generated work, extra review work for maintainers, aggressive scraping of Free Software resources, and the high resource use of large AI systems…

The second option would clearly allow contributions that are partly or fully made by an LLM, as long as contributors check their technical quality, security, licensing, and usefulness, fully understand the changes, and disclose major AI help. It would also ban sending private or sensitive Debian information to untrusted external AI services. A similar fourth option recognizes worries about generative AI but says banning it would be hard to enforce and not helpful. This proposal would accept AI-assisted Debian work if it follows the Debian Free Software Guidelines, is properly reviewed and understood by the contributor, and is marked as AI-assisted when needed. The fifth proposal is even more open. It says Debian should not support or ban generative AI tools, but should apply the same standards for quality, correctness, maintainability, and legality to all contributions, no matter how they were made…

One unique proposal is called “Debian is created by humans.” Instead of banning AI tools for contributors, it focuses on what actually gets included in Debian. With this approach, contributors could use generative AI for research, analysis, exploration, or critique, but could not submit AI-generated output directly as Debian packaging, patches, documentation, bug reports, project communications, or other Debian work. As the proposal says: humans create Debian. Another, much stricter proposal asks Debian contributors to avoid LLM use as much as possible. It would require all Debian communication, like bug reports, mailing-list messages, Salsa discussions, and Planet Debian posts, to be written only by humans. Any AI use in Debian work would have to be disclosed, and violations could be handled under the project’s Code of Conduct.
The CEO/founder of AI-native compliance management platform company Strike Graph believes a Debian AI ban is “the wrong fix for the actual problem” at hand, reports The New Stack:
“Debian’s ban isn’t really about banning AI,” [CEO Justin] Beals says. “It’s an admission that nobody has built a reliable way to verify what an AI agent actually produced before it lands in a codebase this many systems depend on, including infrastructure running in orbit. That’s a legitimate thing to be worried about....” He thinks that any policy statement that says AI isn’t allowed simply won’t hold up, as the tooling keeps getting harder to detect…

Looking across the complete set of tabled propositions, proposal A (no LLM contributions to Debian via social contract) needs a 3:1 majority to pass; the other seven proposals (B to H) need a simple majority.

News just in

By BladeMelbourne • Score: 3 Thread

A company which makes money because AI exists - doesn’t want this!

More news at 11.

AI will rot our brains

By Damouze • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Personally, I would go for the “Debian is made by humans” option or the option to exclude it alltogether.

I feel very strongly that AI - at least the current way it is deployed - does more harm than good. Loss of (human) cognitive function through its overuse. An enormous ecological impact due to massive energy and cooling requirements of megadatacenters, you name it.

The future of AI lies, as far as I’m concerned, in smaller scale applications, such as a domestic AI appliance, or in even smaller devices such as mobile phones.

thinking it through

By martin-boundary • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

He thinks that any policy statement that says AI isn’t allowed simply won’t hold up, as the tooling keeps getting harder to detect…

It shouldn’t be about detecting and preventing AI contributions with 100% accuracy. Some AI contributions will get through because people will always try something.

It should be about spelling out the rules, then banishing people who break them, ripping out their “contributions” and shaming them publically if and when they are found out.

This is not any more difficult than policing licensing terms is today. Debian already has a history of banishing non-Free software packages into special source repos. And, like any serious open source project, they already rip out code that isn’t legally safe for them to use (eg if someone steals code and passes it off as their own and makes up a fake license).

Eventually, the answer will be to have a standard mechanism for reporting suspicious sloppy source code and whistleblowing on the cheaters.

Correct one obvious

By loufoque • Score: 3 Thread

The correct choice is obvious, this sort of thing was already experienced in the Linux kernel and elsewhere.

Patches are submitted by humans. It doesn’t matter what tools you used to build the patch, so long as you stand behind it as a human and are responsible for it, meaning you did review it and make sure it is meaningful and worthwhile.

The main concern with AI use is that it will continuously write code and pull requests with no effort; it moves the effort from writing the code to reviewing it. If you don’t actually review and just push that responsibility to others, you’re not doing anything of value and just causing more work for others.

slop vs security

By SysEngineer • Score: 3 Thread
AI can create slop, but it can also find security issues.
I verify the code with AI to find issues.

Defamation Suit Demanding Elsevier Retract Paper Heads Closer To Trial

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Retraction Watch reports:
A trial date has been set in a $1 billion defamation case against Elsevier that alleges the company published what plaintiffs say was a manipulated study about an air purifying technology over objections from peer reviewers. The case has already cost Elsevier a $10,000 sanction from a judge.

Global Plasma Solutions (GPS), which makes air quality products, sued Elsevier in 2022 after the publisher declined to retract a 2021 paper in Building and Environment about GPS’ needlepoint bipolar ionization technology, which it heavily marketed during the COVID-19 pandemic as an air purifier. The complaint claims Elsevier is responsible for the authors’ alleged omission of data and misleading conclusions in the paper that fueled “massive” financial losses for the company, its lawyers claim. Elsevier knew the paper “failed peer review” under its “own standards,” but moved forward with the article despite this knowledge, according to GPS, which now goes by GPS Air.

The complaint has survived a bid by Elsevier to dismiss the case, and a trial has been set for Dec. 7. In allowing the case to proceed, U.S. Magistrate Judge David Keesler said in a May 2024 opinion that GPS has “plausibly alleged actual malice” by Elsevier defined as “knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard for the truth.” Chief Judge Martin Reidinger of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina upheld Keesler’s recommendation in July 2025…

Citing internal and discovery documents, GPS alleges an assessment of 19 journals revealed Elsevier has published more than 1,200 articles either without any peer review, or against the recommendations of the reviewers.
Thanks to long-time Slashdot reader sandbagger for sharing the article.

So…

By rossdee • Score: 3 Thread

What Air Purifier should we buy?

Elsevier?

By Fuzi719 • Score: 3 Thread
Oh, please let Elsevier lose and be summarily executed as punishment.

“needlepoint bipolar ionization technology”

By Chris Mattern • Score: 4, Funny Thread

Aaand now now I’m imagining manic-depressives doing embroidery.

2 a-holes fighting

By gurps_npc • Score: 4, Informative Thread

From my minimal web search it appears to me that:
1) the Plaintiff, Global Plasma Solutions appears to make an inferior product and make ridiculous claims for it.
2) The defendant, media company Elsevier published a poor quality review that made ridiculous and unsupported claim about the quality of the review.

In other words, two a-holes fighting.

Retract Paper Heads

By LindleyF • Score: 3 Thread
I spent way too long trying to figure out the paper heads angle.

Microsoft Blames Windows Gaming Issues On RGB Lighting Devices

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
BleepingComputer reports:
Microsoft says ongoing issues causing games to crash or fail to launch after installing the August 2026 Windows updates may be caused by peripherals with RGB lighting.

As Microsoft explained when it confirmed it’s investigating on Wednesday, this known issue affects games like ARC Raiders, MARVEL Tokon: Fighting Souls, and The Finals on systems running Windows 11 24H2 and 25H2… "[Peripherals or internal device components with RGB lighting features] may install drivers or code components with file names similar to inpoutx64. In systems where these drivers are found, the issue is then triggered by launching certain games,” it noted.
Thanks to Slashdot reader joshuark for sharing the article.

a path-traversal attack

By usedtobestine • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Poorly written applications by both game developers and poorly written operating systems by Microsoft.

Led lighting sucks

By boojumbadger • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

It is completely useless. I bought a box recently it has 6 fans with lighting that I shut off and lights on the ram I couldn’t see how. As for Windows profitability, they’d have a lot fewer sales if it wasn’t on all the prefabs. It is cheaper and easier to buy a prefab with windows than to buy the parts and put them together without. My box cam with win11 and I booted it exactly once by mistake before I wiped it an put Linux on it. Can I get the MS tax back? not on your life. Oh and the NVIDIA card has an led branding, I guess its an Aero that I can’t turn off either.

Oh well, I guess there is a cost for expediency.
What the use is a light on my mouse that gets covered by my hand? At least I finally twigged on how to turn it off permanently using CKB-Next, except it comes back on with the box is off. How stupid is that?

InpOutx64 is a security nightmare

By djgl • Score: 5, Informative Thread

The purpose of that driver is to bypass Windows’ memory protection to access arbitrary I/O ports from user space and to map physical memory regions into the address space of a process. It is a cheap workaround for people who don’t want to go through the certification process required by Microsoft for drivers nowadays.

Re:InpOutx64 is a security nightmare

By WarlockD • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

This is an old problem too, The old driver could, in theory, let you bit bang any ports on the system. PCI ports, PCIE ports, and the LPC. Its also an opensource singed driver and developers tend to never update whatever version of the base driver so it never keeps up with the security updates.

I want to blame allot of people here but in the end its Microsoft’s unwillingness to make some simple built in port api. Make it signed with some VID/PID. Have the vender tell the kernel what port it what’s and have the kernel accept or deny it right there.

I just don’t see why Microsoft killed off the direct parallel interface. The only thing I can figure is they were to lazy to abstract the interface from their printer spooler nightmare. You don’t have any of these problems with the serial.

Re:a path-traversal attack

By AmiMoJo • Score: 5, Informative Thread

In this case it’s an open source driver that is the problem. Specifically this one: https://www.highrez.co.uk/Down…

The maintainer abandoned it, but everyone kept using it because it’s the only real option for apps (including open source ones like Open Hardware Monitor) to access the motherboard SMBUS which controls fans and RGB lighting, among other things.

It’s not clear exactly what the cause of the crash is, but it may be related to anti-cheat tech which basically rootkits Windows and then panics when it sees certain drivers installed.

Battery Fires At Recycling Centres Are Costing the UK £1bn a Year

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Wrongly discarded lithium batteries, such as those in vapes, are causing more than 10 fires a week at U.K. recycling centers, according to figures shared with the Guardian:
The Environment Services Association (ESA), the trade body for waste management companies, said its members had reported 1,518 fires in the year to March 2026. At least 541 of these fires were directly attributed to lithium ion batteries, the survey found. There were a further 216 battery fires in bin lorries [garbage trucks]. The ESA said the reported number of battery-related fires underestimated the scale of the problem, because in most incidents it was impossible to determine the cause of the blaze. A spokesperson said: “We know 40% of fires at recycling centres are caused by batteries, but we think the actual number is more like 70%.”

It estimates that annual cost of these fires has increased from £150m in 2021 to £1bn today… The ESA is calling for a £5 deposit scheme on the sale of all vapes to ensure that vape users have an incentive to return used devices to retailers for safe disposal… [Patrick Brighty, the head of recycling policy at the ESA, said] “Vapes are among the biggest culprits because they’re cheap, abundant and typically have a short use-life.”
Thanks to long-time Slashdot reader AmiMoJo for sharing the news.

The problem is obvious

By MpVpRb • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

If it’s very easy to properly dispose of something, it will be disposed properly.
If it requires driving across town, when the recycling facility is open, waiting in line, filling out a form and paying a fee, proper recycling will be rare

Re:Ban or tax them

By markdavis • Score: 4 Thread

>“What’s needed is a different battery chemistry, but as long as Lithium batteries are available at low cost, this problem isn’t going away.”

What hasn’t happened in any significant way is to package lithium batteries in some small, unique sizes (different from non-lithium) and mandate things have openable battery hatches, like we have traditionally had in all battery-operated devices, and used these sizes. There are lithium standards like these:
https://em3ev.com/lithium-batt… but they are very difficult to find and don’t go small enough for many devices. And there are no standards for rectangular prismatic cells (that I know of).

Manufacturers really love the idea of non-replaceable batteries. It is horrible for consumers, and horrible for the environment, but wonderful for manufacturers because it is slightly less expensive, makes devices smaller/sleeker, and requires consumers to keep rebuying things....

I was recently looking for some wireless phone headsets. Now, suddenly, they ALL have non-replaceable batteries! All of them. I don’t want to spend $150 on a quality headset that will become trash in just 2 or 3 years when the battery dies. But what choice do I have? My old Plantronics one that I love had a replaceable one. It was small, lightweight, and sleek, yet had a battery compartment. I have replaced the battery twice (3 batteries total) even though it wasn’t a “standard” size, and still use it today. But I what do I buy now for other users?

My toothbrush- non-openable/replaceable.
My Sony stereo headset- non-openable/replaceable.
My watch- non-openable/replaceable.
My USB power bank- non-openable/replaceable.
My micro keyboard- non-openable/replaceable.
My phone- non-openable/replaceable.
My bike light- non-openable/replaceable.
My beard trimmer- non-openable/replaceable.
My hand-held carpet spill cleaner- non-openable/replaceable.

I could go on, but you get the idea. There are countless MILLIONS of these things out there now.

Re:Hold up…

By Fly Swatter • Score: 4, Funny Thread
The current problem is:

government: ‘you must recycle that battery…’
user: ‘ok’ (user proceeds to throw battery into standard recycling can)
government: '… properly at a battery recycling receptacle.’
user: ‘whatever, I did my part.’

2nd user: ‘we’re supposed to recycle?’

Re:Hold up…

By Barsteward • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
Probably not a battery recycling centres, idiots just put them in the normal trash

Re:833,333 GBP per fire avg?

By serviscope_minor • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

That’s 830K GBP average per fire which seems… rather high.

It’s… not.

Most of the fires pass without notice and the facility will be back up and running in an hour or two. Occasionally one gets out of hand and a £40mn facility burn to the ground.

An two hour outage isn’t free either, but the majority of the cost come from the occasional incredibly destructive one.

Don’t these places have some form of on site fire detection and suppression? like some fire hoses or something.

I mean sure you can assume everyone who works in a field you know nothing about is a massive bunch of numpties who can’t think of basic things like installing fire suppression. Or…

Well tell you what, if you’re in the UK, why not come to the RWM expo in Birmingham (might even be free to non exhibitors) and have a look at the somewhat impressive range of industrial fire suppression equipment available for waste facilities. E.g.

https://www.ess-expo.co.uk/202…

These facilities have fire suppression. Lots of it, with massive water reserves and often diesel pumps in case the electricity supply goes down. And fire detection in a very dusty environment is also hard because too many false positives will overwhelm your operating margins.

.

How Will AI Change the Field of Mathematics?

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“AI went from being very terrible to seemingly genuinely quite good at a professional level in a very short space of time…” says the Verge’s AI reporter. But AI systems “are still truly, truly terrible at some areas of math… even the days of the week.”
If you look at academic math papers, a lot of the time you won’t see numbers… So they’re still terrible, but they’re now also very good at this other part. As to why, at some point you reach a critical mass of what these systems can do. We saw it with writing, we’ve seen it with programming. They’re very good at forging connections between different areas, applying old methods in new ways, those kinds of things. It appears that the newer models they’re training have apparently reached that level where it clicks, and now it can do math…

There are areas now where it seems to be producing work that is on par with good mathematicians, alongside other parts where yeah, it can’t count. All caught up in that is whether it’s going to rewrite employment structures or funding structures… One would hope [math researchers] would branch out into all of these new exciting areas or pose new questions. But AI won’t do that, and that’s the concern. And then that would leave the field quite sterile, and it will have all of these things that have been done, and maybe nothing left to pursue… [A] lot are scared that it’s closing off the field. So by definition, those breakthroughs that lead to something surprising and new that you can say, “Oh, this works here,” may not be happening anymore…

There were some bleak responses from graduate students I saw in essays posted online. Where’s their place in this as future researchers? Do they have a place in this? Is it as glorified AI proof checkers? That will be quite an unsatisfying career, I imagine. Or maybe not, I don’t know. We will see. I think anything used properly will be a net boon.
They also had an interesting response when asked if AI democratizes access to high-level mathematical proofs:
A lot of the mathematicians I spoke to were almost quite weary of this, actually. They love the idea, in theory, of democratizing access. They’re also quite fed up with AI-generated or -assisted papers that are flooding every publication imaginable, as well as the pre-print servers that they use in these fields. Some of those I spoke to said things like, “Oh, I got three emails this week alone with people being like, ‘Hey, is this legit?’" Because they thought they’d solved something with ChatGPT or with Claude, and they also don’t have the mathematical skills to check whether they’ve actually solved something.

On the flip side, there are parts where they said, “Well, we’ve got a talented undergrad who’s done something that a talented undergrad would probably have never managed, and here they are doing grad-level work and they’ve produced a paper that is legit.” And in the bigger scheme of things, a few I spoke to said, “Well yeah, a lot of these are in the ivory tower. Having access to this kind of thing globally could really boost access to the kind of things here.” On the flip side, the cost. These things cost a lot to run.

Millennium Prize

By SigIO • Score: 3 Thread

I predict an AI will be instrumental or outright solve a Millennium Prize.

Re:Millennium Prize

By martin-boundary • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
I predict it will turn out some obscure forgotten paper from 1974 did it first.

The real answer…

By MpVpRb • Score: 3 Thread

We don’t know.
It might help a bit.
It might revolutionize math.
It might help invent a radically different kind of math that answers very difficult questions in physics and engineering.
It might hit a wall.

The wrong way to look at it is like a labor union boss who criticizes it because it might affect employment of mathematicians.

A short list of major math AI successes

By JoshuaZ • Score: 3 Thread
The following is a non-exhaustive list of major successes in math by AI, and then my own speculations/predictions. Note that all of these have happened since

Erdos 1196, completely solved by the AI. https://www.erdosproblems.com/1196. This was the first major unambiguous success by an AI where the solution was clearly not the AI just finding something from a really obscure part of its training data. The method involved a clever construction of a Markov chain on the natural numbers with the chain weighted via the von Mangoldt function.

The Unit Distance Conjecture. This is a really cool and easy to understand problem so I’m going to take a moment to talk about what it is. Suppose you want to put n points in the plane and you want to maximize the number of points which are exactly distance 1 away from each other. Note this is the same as just picking some distance k and making lots of points all distance k from each other and then rescaling. Now, the most naive thing to do is put one point in the center of a circle and then put n-1 points on the edge of that circle. That gets you n-1. But if you instead put your n points in a grid, and make it as close to a square as you can get, then you can get around a constant times n^2 points all the same distance. The conjecture was that this was close the best possible. In particular, that for any epsilon>0, you could not do better than O(n^(2+epsilon)). The AI constructed a clever tower of fields to disprove the conjecture. This was previously discussed also on Slashdot here https://science.slashdot.org/story/26/05/21/0351218/openai-claims-it-solved-an-80-year-old-math-problem

The Cycle Double Cover Conjecture https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.15399 was a long-standing problem in graph theory. Curiously, the problem’s solution is something that a skilled undergrad could have plausibly come up with but apparently no one did. The proof uses some standard graph theory tools and then connects it to some ideas from linear algebra, but linear algebra is already pretty often used in graph theory.

The Jacobian conjecture for n=3 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacobian_conjecture This is a conjecture that was major enough that I’ve mentioned it when I’ve taught multivariable calculus. n=2 is still open. This is one where there may have been some amount of human input but we don’t know.

OpenAI released a set of 10 major problems here https://openai.com/index/ten-advances-in-mathematics/. I’m not going to go into all 10 of these in detail, but I will note that both the Ramsey problem and the sphere packing problem are not too complicated to understand. I had also given some thought to both of those problems and got nowhere. The sphere packing problem was close to things I thought about in grad school, and the Ramsey problem is close to some things I’ve been thinking about it. Of the other 8, 6 we’re ones I was familiar with simply because they were well known. For the other 2 of those, I’ve discussed them now with people in those subfields and confirmed that OpenAI’s description of these as major problems is not unreasonable. We don’t have direct confirmation that there was minimal human input here.

But by far the biggest breakthrough was recently when Anthropic released a proof which increased the percentage of non-trivial zeros of the Riemann zeta function [on the critical line from around 41% to 67.2% . https://www.anthropic.com/research/riemann-zeta. A clarification: You don’t get to prove the Riemann hypothesis when you get 100% on the line. The Riemann hypothesis is that all non-trivial zeros live on the critical line. But that’s stricter than 10

Rush Rescue Mission for NASA’s $500M Space Telescope Fails

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Remember that rush rescue mission for NASA’s $500M space telescope? It failed, reports CNN, and the LINK satellite won’t be able to boost the telescope’s orbit. NASA says its decades-old Swift telescope will now continue losing altitude, until it reaches Earth’s atmosphere later this year and burns up.

CNN reports:
Just weeks after LINK lifted off on July 3, it started to spin out of control. [Satellite designer] Katalyst was able to regain control of the satellite, but the company acknowledged that the issue cost it time, which would delay LINK’s rendezvous with Swift by about a month. However, that postponement — at least initially — did not seem to be a deterrent to the mission. Now, NASA and Katalyst have announced that LINK’s mission will not capture and boost Swift to a higher orbit “due to ongoing attitude control issues,” according to statements Wednesday.

“NASA should be willing to move quickly and take smart risks when the potential return is worth it, and that is exactly what we did with this mission,” NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman said in a statement. “This is not the outcome we were working toward, but it does not change why this mission was worth attempting. The team moved with extraordinary speed to give Swift a chance to carry out more science while advancing capabilities America will need for satellite servicing in the future....”

The mission team is forging ahead with its plan for LINK to rendezvous with Swift — but as a demonstration rather than a rescue. “We are going to learn everything we can from LINK’s rendezvous attempt and put those lessons to work on the missions that follow,” Isaacman said… Swift wasn’t designed to be serviced in space, which means that insights from the demonstration could be used for future missions… “We have already learned a tremendous amount,” [said Ghonhee Lee, CEO of Katalyst Space Technologies], “and now our job is to turn those lessons into something durable — building a repeatable playbook to inform future rendezvous and proximity operations and satellite servicing.”

This is really sad

By 93 Escort Wagon • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Pity us Americans. Apparently two telescope rescue missions have failed just during the past few days.

Flock is Secretly Building a Powerful New Prompt-Based AI Tool for Police

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Slashdot reader fjo3 shared this article from Wired:
[Flock] has told the public for years that its technology “cannot recognize, identify, or track individuals.” It has now built a system that does both, an artificial intelligence tool for police that can identify drivers and track vehicles by their patterns of movement alone, WIRED has learned… Because the system also reaches police case files, 911 dispatch logs, and commercial identity records, those plates can be turned into names, home addresses, and relatives. It can search for people in an area drawn on a map based on nothing more than a physical description…

The code describes 45 tools at the AI’s disposal, giving it access to plate scans and camera metadata, arrest records, case files, dispatch logs, ballistics results, and commercial databases that contain Social Security numbers, dates of birth, phone numbers, email addresses, relatives and associates. Flock says it is testing the product with a small group of law enforcement partners and describes it as still in development, with capabilities that may not reflect what it eventually sells. It arrives as the company faces bipartisan political pressure, a growing record of officers caught misusing its platform, and a wave of vandalism that has left cameras sawed off and lenses painted over in cities across the country…

An officer no longer needs a plate, a name, or a crime to begin: They supply a place, a stretch of time, and a pattern of behavior, and the system is designed to hand back the people who fit… One prompt Flock preloaded into the system reads: “Find me witnesses based on vehicles most seen in [neighborhood] during [last 14 days] during [daily timeframe] *(will not include whitelisted vehicles).” An officer would fill in the blanks and submit it. The output is a list of plates, which other tools in the product then convert into names and home addresses. Another prompt instructs the system to list everyone arrested more than twice in two years for “any offense,” exempting only narcotics arrests, and then says to map where those people live, retrieve the calls for service at their homes, and “do a workup on the top three individuals.” The prompt begins with everyone in the area who has an arrest record and ends with dossiers on three of them, chosen by the software. A “workup,” in Flock’s terminology, is a one-command background check. It starts with a name and a date of birth and returns what the department’s records and commercial data hold: vehicles, prior listings as a suspect, and, on a second screen, relatives, phone numbers, and online accounts.
Wired shares this reaction from a law professor at George Washington University.

“It is clear Flock has aspirations far beyond ALPRs to become a digital platform for policing,”

“Policing” Is Doing a Lof of Heavy Lifting Here

By ewhac • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

“It is clear Flock has aspirations far beyond ALPRs to become a digital platform for policing," [emphasis mine]

They misspelled, “Orwellian suveillance and harrassment.”

Law enforcement officers are already abusing Flock’s existing capabilities for stalking. This will not improve matters one iota.

Re:Flock needs to be destroyed

By Local ID10T • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Some cities have already suspended their contract’s with Flock. Other’s have deactivated the cameras.

Note that these two things are not the same. Cancelling a contract does not necessarily remove or deactivate a camera.

The cameras were installed as part of the contract with the municipality (city. state, county, fed, etc.) but are owned and operated by Flock. The cancellation of the contract just means ending the payments for access to the Flock system. It would take further action to order the removal/deactivation of the cameras. Flock is still watching, and other police forces can still use the data they are collecting.

If your municipality says it is “cancelling its contract with Flock”, make sure they are actually removing the cameras, not just agreeing to stop subscribing to the Flock system.

The devil is in the details.

Low Emission Zone Led To Better Lung Size, Function Among London Children

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Long-time Slashdot reader AmiMoJo shared this report from the Guardian:
Children’s lungs grew bigger and stronger after the most polluting vehicles were restricted from entering London, a study has found. Examinations of London schoolchildren before and after the introduction of the city’s ultra-low emission zone found a restoration of lung capacity that had been stunted by exposure to pollution… “Traffic pollution in cities damages children’s health and development,” said Chris Griffiths, a professor of primary care at the University of Oxford and Queen Mary University of London, and the study’s joint senior author. “We provide the strongest evidence yet on how these harms can be prevented. Ambitious clean-air zones should be considered a priority for cities globally with traffic-related air pollution.”

Air pollution from traffic has stunted the development of children’s lungs in London for decades. Previous research found that by the age of eight or nine, children from the most polluted areas had 5-10% less lung capacity than their peers elsewhere. That impairment, which scientists said was the result of exposure to nitrogen dioxide, put them at increased risk as adults of developing respiratory diseases, such as asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cardiovascular and metabolic disease, and premature death.

High Aspirations

By algaeman • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
If only we had some sort of technology that would allow us to replace oil burning vehicles with a cleaner alternative.

Better Lung Size?!

By 93 Escort Wagon • Score: 5, Funny Thread

This is woke nonsense. These people should be happy with the lungs they’ve got. What’s next, outlawing cars and mandating bicycles? Free healthcare for all?

Are there no prisons? Are there no workhouses?

Re:You have every reason to …

By JoshuaZ • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Regarding 1. In fact, post-pandemic traffici levels are as high as they were before the pandemic. In fact, traffic levels were already close to normal by October of 2020 in London, while the pandemic was still going on, in part due to people being less willing to take public transit. See https://www.london.gov.uk/who-we-are/what-london-assembly-does/questions-mayor/find-an-answer/changes-london-road-traffic-march-2020. and https://fleetworld.co.uk/uk-road-traffic-back-at-pre-covid-levels/. World-wide, we’ve seen pretty similar trends. https://inrix.com/blog/2023-global-traffic-scorecard/.

Re 2 and 3: Aside from that being highly exaggerated at what happened, it also isn’t relevant to evaluating this study or making this study become “dishonest propaganda.” If your claims are accurate, then they would be reasons to see there as being tradeoffs. But it wouldn’t be a problem with this study or this study’s claim. I’m not even sure what point you are trying to make with point 4. Are you claiming that the reduction in lung issues is due to less use of boilers due to climate change? While climate change is having an impact, it isn’t remotely large enough yes to have had that big an impact on heating that way. It isn’t what is going on here.

Re:You have every reason to …

By Malc • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Have you been to London? The traffic in the centre is as bad as it ever was. It’s faster to cycle.

Work from home has increased traffic in the outer boroughs during the work day.

The ULEZ brought the biggest improvements in air quality in the outer boroughs. Inner boroughs benefitted too. Sounds like a win.

The rest of your post is inarticulate. Take a breathe next time and explain the points you’re trying to make properly.

This paper is nonsensical

By WaffleMonster • Score: 3 Thread

They are trying to say in London which started out and remained more polluted than Luton throughout the entirety of the study period reached parity with Luton in terms of expiratory volume of children.

This premise seems rather insane for multiple reasons:

1. London remained significantly more polluted throughout the entirety of the study. The effects of the NPI had only marginal impact on pollution levels yet the spread of NO2 levels between London and Luton started out and remained enormous… London retained basically double the pollution level of Luton throughout the entirety of the study period. In relative terms the shrinking delta between them was tiny. London started out at ~35 NO2 and Luton ~15… London ended up at about ~28 NO2 vs ~13 for Luton.

I suppose there could be some kind of very specific magical threshold of NO2 pollution in children by which such effects could just happen to materialize yet absent extraordinary evidence this isn’t a reasonable conclusion. The more reasonable conclusion is NO2 at the levels measured don’t have any statistically relevant effect on expiratory volume within the constraints of the study.

They in my view are being intentionally dishonest throughout by the continuous use of relative change between London and Luton instead of simply referencing absolute numbers. They are leading the reader to make assumptions that are inherently nonsensical BS.

2. There is at no point in absolute terms any year measured with a difference in expiratory volume that exceeds the CI between London and Luton. There is no statistically significant difference yet the paper and the TFA keep pretending otherwise by invoking the same relative vs absolute trick as for the NO2 levels.

3. Comparing people living in huge cities with 20x the population of a much smaller city is BS to begin with. You compare like to like especially given well known lifestyle differences that directly impact health.

Moderna-Merck Vaccine Cuts Recurrence And Spread of Melanoma, Raises New Treatment Hope

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Reuters reports “a major success in a new field of cancer treatment this week, as Moderna and Merck announced a personalized mRNA cancer vaccine “reduced the risk of recurrence and spread of melanoma in a late-stage trial”. The vaccine was tested with Merck’s widely used immunotherapy drug Keytruda:
Thousands of patients who have undergone surgery to remove high-risk melanoma tumors could benefit as soon as next year if regulators approve the vaccine, Moderna President Stephen Hoge said in an interview. This is the first positive late-stage trial result for an mRNA cancer vaccine, which trains a patient’s immune system to fight tumors by targeting specific mutations in those cells, and the first such study to show that adding a treatment to Keytruda worked better than that therapy alone… Interim results of the ongoing study, released on Wednesday, found the treatment, Intismeran, met both its primary target of reducing cancer recurrence and its secondary goal of preventing tumors from spreading to other parts of the body, compared with Keytruda alone. When the vaccine is injected into a patient, the patient’s cells produce copies of mutations for the immune system to recognize and destroy… Merck said the companies are already in talks with regulators about the treatment.
“Merck, Moderna and other companies are testing similar approaches against lung, breast and pancreatic cancers,” the article points out. It adds that Karen Knudsen, CEO of the Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, “said the Moderna results could signal a new era for treating solid-tumor cancers.”

More from CNN:
The trial result is “a monumental leap forward,” validating mRNA technology as a cancer treatment, said Dr. Julie Gralow, chief medical officer of the American Society of Clinical Oncology…

Roche and BioNTech, whose mRNA technology was used in the Pfizer COVID vaccines, are testing a similar treatment called autogene cevumeran in mid-stage studies in colon and pancreatic cancer patients who have undergone surgery. Results of the colon cancer trial are expected in 2027, with pancreatic trial results to follow in 2031. “We should be hearing results from multiple studies over the next few years and there’s every reason to hope now, with this news, that many of them will be positive,” said Dr. Robert Vonderheide, director of Penn Medicine’s Abramson Cancer Center and president-elect of the American Association for Cancer Research.

Good Dupe

By SlashbotAgent • Score: 3 Thread

This is great news and thus worth repeating.

I’m afraid to ask what the price of the vaccine might be. But, that vaccination is even possible is a gigantic step in the right direction.

God bless Donald Trump

By Valgrus Thunderaxe • Score: 3 Thread
I know he’s a big fan of mRNA vaccines. He’ll be remembered as the president who cured cancer.

Re: As a pure-blood MAGA person

By sixminuteabs • Score: 5, Funny Thread
I encourage all red states to ban this vaccine

This isn’t the path to final cure

By backslashdot • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Not every tumor has strong neo-antigen presentation and many use complex immune evasion strategies that may be hard to defeat, therefore treatment evasion is still possible. https://www.cell.com/cancer-ce… Also notice they aren’t using it as a treatment during cancer. You have to be mostly cancer free for it to work — and even then it’s not 100%.

The issue is that it will always be tough to identify a cell as cancerous from the outside. To do it reliably, you have to do it from INSIDE the cell. Unfortunately getting things into cells is not trivial.

The path to a final cure (an agent that can be easily transported into every type of cell, determine if it’s within a cancer cell, and destroy it) will be something like the following: https://www.nature.com/article… (explanatory article about it: https://www.nature.com/article… )

There are numerous problems to solve with the “final cure” path though. I can list about a bunch .. but the good news is that for each one, there are about 2 or 3 possible ways it can be solved — I think. We’re probably about a decade or two out (consider the papers on neo-antigen vaccines started coming out in the 1990s, first proof-of-concept in early 2000s, and a “holy smokes, this thing really works” paper around 2017 I think). And note the neo-antigen therapy is still not approved.

Is AI Really to Blame for High Unemployment Among Recent Graduates? What Economists Say

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot
47% of recent graduates say AI has already impacted hiring in their field, according to an April survey from ZipRecruiter.

“But is AI really the problem, or is it more complicated?” asks NPR. “Here’s what economists have to say.”
According to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, the unemployment rate for recent graduates — which it defines as 22-to-27-year-olds with a new bachelor’s degree or higher — was 5.7% as of June, more than the rate for all workers, which stands at 4.1%… Stanford University economist Erik Brynjolfsson says AI is impacting the labor market for entry-level roles. “AI is not the whole story, but it’s part of the story and the evidence is building,” he says. Using payroll data, Brynjolfsson and his co-authors found that since late 2022 — when large language models like ChatGPT started popping up — early-career workers ages 22 to 25 in AI-exposed roles, like software developers and marketing managers, have experienced a 16% relative employment decline. In comparison, employment rates for older workers in AI-exposed fields and for all workers in jobs that aren’t easily automated — like home health aides, physical therapists and construction workers — remained stable or have grown over that same time period… [Though he also says often when companies pull back on hiring, they cut junior roles first.]

Harvard University economist David Deming isn’t convinced that AI is to blame for the challenging early-career job market. “If you look very carefully at the timing, it looks like the decline in junior hiring actually started a bit like six months before ChatGPT was released. And so what that tells me is it’s something else,” Deming says. “I think it’s more like remote work.” A recent analysis from the New York Fed found that companies are less likely to hire recent college grads into roles that can be done remotely. As remote jobs increased following the COVID-19 pandemic, so did unemployment among younger college grads, the New York Fed found. The analysis also found that AI didn’t explain the rise in unemployment among younger workers and that remote work was more of a driving force… Employers hiring for remote jobs may be less likely to choose an entry-level candidate because it’s harder to train them from afar… [And with remote positions, there’s many more senior candidates to choose from.]

And here’s another thing to consider: University of Chicago economist Anders Humlum says if AI were replacing entry-level jobs, you’d expect to see companies that rely heavily on AI to hire fewer workers. But that’s not what the data shows. Humlum points to a study done by the financial accounting firm Ramp and the workforce research company Revelio Labs. The study examined AI spending and employee head count across more than 21,000 U.S. firms, from early 2021 to early 2026. It found that at companies making the largest AI investments, entry-level head count grew by 12% over the two years following AI adoption.

Yes, and…

By TheMiddleRoad • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
No economic situation is the result of one factor. Rarely is anything the result of one factor. Is AI having massive impacts on hiring? Absolutely. “Impacts” is a plural word. The economy is also struggling under Trump’s immense mismanagement, with the rich getting richer and everyone else more likely to be getting fucked. The tariffs have increased inflation and driven a knife into the economy’s gut worldwide. Is AI replacing jobs? Certainly. Is there need for people? Certainly. Are young people a pain in the ass to hire, train, and keep? Absolutely. Are they worse now than they were, say, 20 or 40 years ago? I don’t rightly know. Every generation complains about the next and then shits all over them.

They had massive impact on operations

By rsilvergun • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
If you actually use the site it has tons of technical problems. Also they completely eliminated all the manual moderation.

Twitter has a major problem. So the US Republican party are basically nazis. I don’t say that as some dumb edgy insult I mean it. They are active fascists with a heavy emphasis on racism. This is not up for debate it’s just a brute fact. We all know what the southern strategy is and we all know that the Republican party routinely engages in voter suppression.

Now the US Republican party would like to give you some plausible deniability so that when you are angry at the Democrats for not fixing the problems caused by the Republicans you will continue the vote for the Republicans and they can cause more problems for you. This is the cycle of American politics that we have been trapped in since Richard Nixon.

So Republicans use dog whistles. That is to say they blurt out incredibly racist and fascist things but they say it in a way that is not obvious to people who don’t follow politics.

The problem is automatic moderation tools that exist to ban Nazis going on about the Jews and calling for extermination and whatnot will quickly draw the connections between the dog whistles that is sitting US senator or member of the House says and what the open neo-nazis are saying. You can’t fold those algorithms they’re too well written.

This meant that the algorithms kept banning major Republican politicians for being Nazis and we can’t have that because those people have a lot of money and power.

But the advertisers don’t want the out in the open Nazis because they are bad for business. Those guys turn off consumers and you don’t want your brand associated with them. Look up the YouTube adpocalypse to see what happens when the advertisers find out that they’re brands are sitting next to guys like Nick Fuentes.

So Twitter needed an army of moderators to keep the obvious Nazis off while keeping the less obvious Nazis on.

Musk fired those so now Twitter is Nazi City. This makes it basically impossible to engage with Twitter in any useful manner which means they can’t do data acquisition and they can’t throw advertisements in the people’s eyeballs because all of that depends on massive amounts of engagement.

That means Twitter is basically useless to any advertiser except for scam artists and sure enough Twitter is full of scams and nothing else. The scam artists cannot pay very much so Twitter is constantly bleeding cash. That’s fine though because it’s mostly being used as a propaganda tool to keep people from questioning why a man with no technical skills who has repeatedly failed to meet promises and whose cars have killed several people because of faulty Lane assist features being sold as self-driving gets to be a trillionaire.

Nerds meanwhile see musk is one of their own when he’s nothing of the sort. Yeah he’s kind of weird and creepy like a lot of us are but in our case that’s through no fault of our own and mostly an accident of birth musk worked to get that creepy and weird.

All this means that yeah the website doesn’t constantly experience full crashes but it breaks all the time and is basically unusable for anything except of message board you do a single post too that nobody replies to except box and Nazis.

Previously there was a shitload of really good journalism being done on Twitter Believe it or not. And naturally all of that is dead. Not to mention all the other useful features that were taken away.

So no you can’t just fire your whole staff. Any other company that wasn’t just being propped up so that it could be used for propaganda by right wing extremist fascists would have immediately collapsed after cutting that staff.

Remember Twitter did not pay off all the debt it took on for the buyout. It transferred that debt to other companies that Elon Musk owns and then a complicated series of stock maneuvers took that that and put it into your 401K retirement plan.

Do you like being lied to?

By rsilvergun • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
You can literally look up the statistics on degrees being awarded. Virtually no worthless degrees or being rewarded. Unless what you mean is that when somebody goes and studies a serious discipline and they can’t get a job because we’ve created the economy with the same trickle down economics we’ve been cratering the economy with since Ronald Reagan then I mean yeah I guess but that’s not really the fault of the student, there is plenty of work for them to be doing that would be useful to you and everyone else, that’s the fault of the voter who after 50 fucking years still can’t realize that it never trickles down.

Getting back to how much you like being lied to, again there is a propaganda Network feeding you that line and you are willfully sloping it up like a pig at a trough. Why? Literally a few minutes on Google and you can find the government backed statistics that tell you degrees awarded by Major and you can see that there is a very tiny handful of people getting degrees that do not have an immediate productive economic purpose. Everything else is people doing work and a bunch of teachers. And you need teachers for your fucking crotch fruit.

Again I ask why do you actively seek out people to lie to you and obvious ways? I would legitimately like an answer and a explanation for why you find that so engaging and entertaining.

Hiring

By reanjr • Score: 3 Thread

Regardless of any wider impact from skill mismatch or automation, AI has most definitely negatively impacted the hiring process.

Re: Why do we listen to “economists”?

By reanjr • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Christian Science Monitor is actually a decent news source. You obviously can’t avoid bias on stories about faith and religion, but otherwise, it’s pretty neutral.