Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. X’s Algorithm Feeds Off Ragebait and Impacts Democrats More, Study Finds
  2. Army Unit Offers 4-Day Pass to Play GTA VI As Reenlistment Incentive
  3. Chinese Robotics Giant Unitree Soars In Stock Market Debut
  4. Babies Born Under Sugar Rationing Grew Into Adults With Lower Cancer Risk
  5. Physicists Entangle Quantum Memories Across a Record-Breaking 420 Kilometers
  6. Top Album Releases Linked To Rise In Fatal Crashes
  7. Cursor Launches ‘Origin’ Code Hosting Platform As GitHub Alternative
  8. Comcast Is Turning Millions of Its Routers Into Motion Detectors
  9. Disney, ABC Sue FCC Over Threats to Broadcast Licenses
  10. Memory Prices Climb 500% In 12 Months
  11. You Can Finally Buy a Fairphone In the US
  12. Google Buys All of Spirit Airlines’ Data to Feed Its AI Models
  13. Apple Lowers App Store Fees In Europe to Settle Dispute With EU
  14. Microsoft MVP Creates Site to Remind You of All the Brands Redmond Replaced
  15. India Paves the Way For Charging Merchants a Fee On UPI Transactions

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

X’s Algorithm Feeds Off Ragebait and Impacts Democrats More, Study Finds

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from 404 Media:
X’s algorithm learns what you hate and shows you more of it, according to a new study just published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS). The paper, titled Value misalignment of X’s feed algorithm is a reflection of value tensions in engagement, found that the site’s algorithm prioritized engagement above all else when it generated a user’s For You Page. It also showed that X serves more ragebait to people who say they are Democrats, although the exact reason for that is unclear.
“In 2026 that’s maybe not the most surprising headline ever,” Ziv Epstein, a postdoctoral researcher at Stanford University, and co-author of the paper, told 404 Media. “So we actually dug in a little deeper to figure out why this is actually happening, and it turns out that X’s feed algorithm, like a lot of these social media algorithms, is optimized for engagement [but] it turns out that not all types of engagement are considered equally.”
The researchers found that X’s algorithm can push users toward content that conflicts with their stated values, especially when they reply to posts that anger or provoke them. Although replies accounted for just 6.8% of interactions, they appeared to carry disproportionate weight: “It’s this feedback loop of outrage baiting. The algorithm learns that you get outraged and then continues to serve more content in that direction,” said Epstein.

It’s unclear why X seems to serve ragebait to Democrats more often than Republicans. 404 Media speculates that it may be because there’s more rightwing content on X overall or that Democrats tend to engage with posts they disagree with more often. “There might be some kind of differential effects on information diets there, or it might be something more psychological about how different you know partisan identities are triggering different kinds of actions and reactions, but ultimately I don’t want to speculate too much,” said Epstein.

X’s former product chief Nikita Bier confirmed that the site had been set to favor replies. “This is no longer true,” Bier said in a post on X. “The largest contributor of seeing ragebait was the reply predictor and we were aware that angry replies were causing people to see more of that content. So last month, we gave the reply predictor a 15x boost if it’s a friend’s post — and it reduced ragebait by [an] order of magnitude.”

Anyone surprised?

By Dru Nemeton • Score: 3 Thread
Twitter was going downhill long before Musk was sort of forced to buy it to stop even more discovery during the trial. Now it’s just a hellhole.

Different responses

By fahrbot-bot • Score: 3, Interesting Thread

It’s unclear why X seems to serve ragebait to Democrats more often than Republicans. 404 Media speculates that it may be because there’s more rightwing content on X overall or that Democrats tend to engage with posts they disagree with more often.

Republicans instead storm The Capital, assault police and threaten to hang the Vice President - then get pardoned by a Republican. Or conspire to kidnap governors… Yes, I’m painting Republicans with a broad brush, but a LOT of them aren’t denouncing those people and keep supporting the party.

Not necessarily a bad thing

By rtkluttz • Score: 3 Thread

People on ALL social media NEED to see what the other side says just as much as their own. Echo chambers make everything worse for everyone.

Army Unit Offers 4-Day Pass to Play GTA VI As Reenlistment Incentive

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
A U.S. Army battalion at Fort Stewart is offering soldiers a four-day pass timed to the release of Grand Theft Auto VI if they reenlist for at least two years. The program is limited to one unit for now, but it fits the Army’s broader effort to appeal to gamers as a recruiting and retention pool. CBS News reports:
Twenty soldiers at Fort Stewart in Georgia in the Army’s 9th Brigade Engineering Battalion, part of the 3rd Infantry Division, have already chosen this incentive as part of their reenlistment, an Army spokesperson told CBS News on Wednesday. “The idea was to have a unique incentives program that connects to what Soldiers are interested in,” Lt. Col. Angel Tomko, a spokesperson for the 3rd Infantry Division, said in a statement. “The command team, in conjunction with the career counselor, wanted to get soldiers excited to reenlist.”

[…] The Army memo, which has circulated online, says any soldier who signs a reenlistment contract between Aug. 1, 2026 and Nov. 14 will be authorized for a special four-day pass designated to coincide with “the highly anticipated release of the video game Grand Theft Auto VI (GTA 6).” About 130 soldiers are currently eligible for the incentive, Tomko said. Eligible soldiers must reenlist for a minimum of two years and up to six years.

It’s a game to die for I guess

By ebunga • Score: 3 Thread

Or maybe that’s just the ram needed to play the game.

Hope Rockstar doesn’t miss the release date

By Powercntrl • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

So, sign up for two years of military service and get authorized leave for 4 days to play a video game? I guess if that really is the deciding factor to enlist, you probably are just the kind of person the army is looking for.

Chinese Robotics Giant Unitree Soars In Stock Market Debut

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Chinese robotics giant Unitree surged more than 600% in its Shanghai stock market debut, marking the first mainland Chinese listing by a humanoid robot maker and a major milestone for Beijing’s robotics ambitions. The BBC reports:
Unitree, officially known as Yushu Technology Co Ltd, was founded in 2016 and now plays a key role in Beijing’s ambitions to develop advanced technology. It has become a robotics industry leader, selling devices from sensors and automated arms to four-legged and human-like machines. The firm shipped more than 5,500 humanoid robots last year as demand for the technology grows.

Unitree is one of the few companies in the sector to make money, delivering a net profit of 278 million yuan in 2025. It is a fierce rival to developers in the US as it produces robots with similar features but at lower prices. The company is based in Hangzhou, in eastern China. The region is home to a so-called golden cluster zone of robotics firms, which have benefited from huge government investments. That support helped drive a more than threefold increase in the number of Chinese robotics firms between 2020 and 2024, according to state-run China Daily.

[…] Unitree’s robot dogs start at $2,700, a fraction of the roughly $70,000 price tag for Boston Dynamics’ four-legged device, Spot. “They’re not exactly comparable because some of Unitree’s dogs are much smaller,” [said Harold Soh, a researcher from the National University of Singapore]. “But the price is a big difference.” Unitree has been selling humanoid robots since 2023, with its $13,500 child-sized G1 model hitting the market the following year. Meanwhile, major US rivals — including Elon Musk’s Tesla — have yet to start delivering rival products.

[…] Some experts expect Unitree’s market debut to be a gauge of investor appetite for the fast-growing humanoid robotics sector. The listing has given the public a rare chance to invest in a humanoid robotics company and could set a benchmark for other manufacturers, said Jack Pearson from investment firm RoboStrategy. The listing also marks a “turning point” for China’s robotics industry, as Unitree’s success comes even as the US is curbing imports of foreign-made robots, Pearson said.

Babies Born Under Sugar Rationing Grew Into Adults With Lower Cancer Risk

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
A study of more than 64,000 people born around the end of Britain’s postwar sugar rationing found that those exposed to less sugar during their first 1,000 days had lower rates of five cancers decades later, including roughly 69% lower liver cancer risk and 36% lower breast cancer risk. They also “showed signs of slower biological aging” and “continued to consume less sugar and had healthier diets overall,” according to the authors of a new study published in The Conversation. From the report:
After the second world war, sugar remained rationed in Britain for several years. But in September 1953, rationing ended and people started eating a lot more sugar. Consumption nearly doubled. This meant that children born just a few months apart had very different levels of sugar exposure both in the womb and during early childhood. For our study, we used data from over 64,000 people born in Britain between 1951 and 1956. Those born earlier spent a larger share of their first 1,000 days under sugar rationing, while those born later experienced progressively less of it.

[…] What is most surprising, however, is not the cancer results or the biological markers of ageing. It’s how early-life sugar exposure continued to affect people’s diets even 50 years later. We found that people who experienced sugar rationing early in life still consumed less sugar in adulthood, around age 50. They also ate less overall, and their diets were healthier and more diverse. This suggests that the level of sweetness people are exposed to very early in life may shape their taste preferences for a long time.

Re:Or

By Rei • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

“It suggests” if you ignore that their confounder control is terrible. First, sugar wasn’t the only restricted food in post-war Britain - there was also rationing of eggs, butter, cheese and meats that ended during the same timeperiod. So you’re not actually testing the effects of sugar consumption, now are you? Also, the early 1950s was a period of rapid change in the US, including the maturation and expansion of the NHS (founded in 1948), the introduction of new childhood vaccines, major environmental shifts (for example, the Great Smog of London in 1952 vs. the 1956 Clean Air Act). Saying “all changes = sugar” just based on birthdate seems absurd.

It’s also worth mentioning that there’s also survivorship bias - anyone who died before the study couldn’t be enrolled, and there’s also no actual linking to any maternal / childhood dietary logs. Also, the ratios of cancer differences they’re describing aren’t small, they’re massive. Are we to attribute a lung cancer difference on the order of smoking vs. nonsmoking households as being to sugar, or due to, you know, smoking (or pollution) trends not accounted for in their cohort?

A life without sugar

By zawarski • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Is not worth living.

Re:Sugar and crack

By dsgrntlxmply • Score: 4, Funny Thread
My candy thermometer has “Hard Crack” on the scale, so this is clearly true.

sugar

By gary s • Score: 3 Thread
Wasn’t there a lot of rationing happening during this time. How does sugar stand out.

CINC

By Princeofcups • Score: 3 Thread

Correlation is not ..grw!!!!!

Physicists Entangle Quantum Memories Across a Record-Breaking 420 Kilometers

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
alternative_right shares a report from Phys.org:
Optical fibers are already the backbone of global communication systems. Recently, however, physicists have started to explore how their functionality could be boosted further by conveying information via entangled quantum particles — potentially enabling instantaneous exchanges of information across vast distances. Such a system could eventually be the basis of a future ‘quantum internet,’ offering a level of security and computing power beyond anything possible today. In new research published in Physical Review Letters, a team led by Xi-Yu Luo at the University of Science and Technology of China in Hefei has pushed that vision further than ever, entangling two quantum memories across 420 kilometers (261 miles) of optical fiber — more than four times the previous record.

Once again

By T34L • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Entangled quantum particles do not allow for faster than light communication. They allow you to be sure that once you collapse the quantum state on one end, it has been or will be the same one on the other end too. The moment you entagle two states, you know they’re the same (or “matching”, which can also mean opposite depending on the states) without actually measuring either of them (where measuring does require destroying them).

A quantum state is like a scrach lottery ticket. You don’t know if it’s gonna win on lose until you scratch it and essentially invalidate it as a “playable” lottery ticket. Quantum entanglement allows you to “clone” tickets without actually scratching them, but you won’t know if they’re winners or losers, just that they match.

Disgusting summary

By cfalcon • Score: 3 Thread

“potentially enabling instantaneous exchanges of information across vast distances”

NO this has nothing to do with that. This is the first slashdot post in memory that should be fucking deleted. Disgraceful.

Re:Once again

By gargleblast • Score: 4, Informative Thread
Yeah this furphy comes up all the time. Entanglement is not teleportation.
Teleportation (which, let us say, is faster-than-light transmission) is: Carol writes Y therefore Ted reads Y
Entanglement is : Alice reads X therefore Bob reads X
Entanglement and teleportation are not the same. Moreso, entanglement cannot be used for teleportation..

Top Album Releases Linked To Rise In Fatal Crashes

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Guardian:
The release of a new album by Taylor Swift might be a cause for celebration among her fans, but such events have also been linked to a more sombre phenomenon: an increase in fatal car crashes. The team behind a new study say it sheds light on the impact of distracted driving. Writing in the journal Jama Network Open, [Vishal Patel, first author of the study based at Harvard Medical School] and colleagues report how they focused on the release of 10 major albums, launched between 2017 and 2022, selected for having the highest number of Spotify streams over a single day. […] The team found streaming volume for the top 200 songs in the US was 43% higher on the date of major album releases compared with the days surrounding the releases — although such data does not reveal whether the music was being streamed in a car.

[…] The researchers used data from a population-based registry of fatal US motor vehicle crashes to look at the number of traffic fatalities on the dates these albums were released, as well as for the 10 days either side. After taking into account the day of the week upon which the album was released, as well as federal holidays, and time of year, the researchers found the number of US traffic fatalities showed a relative increase of 15.1% on the date of major album releases, compared with similar days either side. “This is equivalent to approximately 182 fatalities in the US attributable to the release days of the 10 included albums,” the team writes.

Patel said the release of a new album could distract drivers because accessing music is a search task, not a single button press. “You unlock the phone, open the app, find the release, read down a tracklist, tap the right song. That’s several seconds of looking at a screen,” he said, adding unfamiliar music also demands more attention, while research has suggested listening to new, high-energy music measurably degrades driving performance. The researchers add the rise in traffic fatalities was greater among certain groups — such as younger drivers, male drivers, people who were driving alone, and people driving cars with a built-in infotainment platform. The authors say the results suggest that “online music streaming through smartphones may significantly contribute to distracted driving and traffic fatalities.”

Most people should not be driving cars

By OrangeTide • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

But without decent public transportation or reliable eyes-off autonomous driving, we’re going to continue to waste money and human life on distracted driving.

While I would love to believe that getting the word out with public service announcements to improve the public’s general awareness of the risks of distracted driving, or actively reworking our training and licensing programs. The cynic in me knows in my bones that most people think they are above average drivers, and that people will feel that raising the requirements to get a license is somehow unfair.

Spotify’s UI sucks.

By devious_malcontent • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
Yeah, I’ve had this problem before, But I’m quick to blame Spotify’s UI because it sucks, when a new album releases, I do not care and the last thing I want to see when I’m driving is a pop up for it. (Yes, this has happened to me), I have a single playlist that I play all the time and if a song that’s playing that I don’t like or don’t feel in the mood for I skip it, using the physical buttons on my steering wheel, and not taking my eyes off the road, (not that Spotify’s Shuffle algorithm is any good, it’s absolute dog shit).

And before I leave, I always make sure it’s set to that playlist as I switch to alternative playlists when I’m doing other tasks, and it’s incredibly difficult to try and change playlists while driving, I learned my lesson a long time ago and I just pull over or mute the stereo entirely and sit in silence. (No, I’ve never had an accident before, but I don’t need to, to know that trying to navigate a touch screen while driving is a bad idea, even at very low speeds).

For some stupid reason as well the user interface is different per phone device, my partner hates it on a new whatever the fuck Samsung’s new flip phone is, because the seek bar is a wobbly groove for some stupid reason, and the album art is in the wrong spot and for some stupid reason they keep insisting on changing the interface because product managers have to justify their job....

I usually have it where if I’m driving with my partner, I get her to set the playlist, but she always puts her trash music on.

Google for some stupid reason also decided to give me Gemini so trying to set navigation through voice commands is an impossible task until I changed it back, it’s still not perfect but it’s better than arguing with a clanker.

Let’s do the time warp again

By Woeful Countenance • Score: 5, Informative Thread

I thought this sounded familiar: it was reported in a working paper from the NBER in February, by Harvard in March, and by The Smithsonian magazine in April. So apparently this is either the final version of a paper previously in progress, or they’re working their way up the chain of high-impact journals. They must have some good publicists. Obviously I need to find some way to work Taylor Swift into my group’s papers.

We must listen to 80’s tunes forever.

By SubmergedInTech • Score: 5, Funny Thread

If it saves even one life, it’s worth whatever it costs.

And no, I don’t mean keep releasing new songs dubbed over Genius of Love. That already happens too frequently.

Solution

By rossdee • Score: 3 Thread

Ban all forms of ICE

Whether its In Car Entertainment, Immigration and Customs Enforcers, Internal Combustion Engines, or frozen H20 on the road surface

Cursor Launches ‘Origin’ Code Hosting Platform As GitHub Alternative

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Cursor has launched Origin, a GitHub-style code hosting platform built directly into its AI coding environment. The company is initially positioning Origin as a low-risk layer on top of GitHub, keeping GitHub as the "source of truth,” but the launch landed just as a major GitHub outage highlighted growing concerns about reliability in the age of AI-generated code. VentureBeat reports:
Cursor began rolling out Origin, its own code hosting platform, to paid users on Monday morning. Roughly three and a half hours later, GitHub’s status page lit up with what became a six-hour-and-forty-two-minute global degradation — error rates near 20% across pull requests, issues and the API, and near 50% on archive and raw file downloads, according to GitHub’s incident log. Enterprise single sign-on went down with it: SAML, OIDC, SCIM provisioning and Team Sync all failed. So did Copilot.

The developer internet did what the developer internet does. “You can now host your repos in Cursor Origin and deploy to Vercel via Cursor Origin which is itself hosted on Vercel,” Vercel chief executive Guillermo Rauch posted on X. “And unlike GitHub, it’s online [smile emoji]" Asked why he was smiling, Rauch replied: “trying to make light of the situation. We ourselves are stuck because of github rn!” Matt Palmer, who works at Cursor, quote-tweeted his own company’s launch with the day’s best line: “We were going to ship this earlier, but GitHub was down.” A GitHub outage, in other words, delayed the launch of a GitHub competitor.

Product launches get locked weeks in advance, and no evidence suggests Cursor timed this one. But the coincidence did the company an enormous favor, because it dramatized the argument Origin exists to make. For eighteen years, choosing where to host your team’s source code has been the least interesting decision an engineering organization makes. Cursor is betting that AI agents have made it interesting again — and for technical decision makers, that is the real news here. Not a new product, but a new procurement question with a governance problem attached.

Name master branches “Master”

By greytree • Score: 3, Insightful Thread
If they show the woke that their reign of hateful ignorance is over and name master branches “Master” by default, they might have some customers.

How about take that retired Win 10 box .

By drnb • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
How about take that retired Win 10 box, download the git documentation, install Linux on the box and setup your own server for your LAN?

Re:Name master branches “Master”

By sabbede • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
Changing what words we use and what they mean is no courtesy. Especially when based on willful ignorance and hypersensitivity to the absurd.

Origin? Really?

By sabbede • Score: 3 Thread
But not the EA one. Not the apparel manufacturer either. Nor is it the 3d printing company. Nor the Hong Kong online retailer, the biotech company, the pharmaceutical packaging company, the materials company, the other biotech company, the custom PC company, or any of the companies on page two, three, and so forth in the search results.

Not the most original name.

Oh good

By CEC-P • Score: 3 Thread
I’m glad they named it that instead of something that was already in use for a giant technology sector product. Good research, guys!

Comcast Is Turning Millions of Its Routers Into Motion Detectors

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Comcast is activating Wi-Fi motion sensing on millions of compatible Xfinity gateways, allowing the routers to detect movement by measuring disruptions in signals between the gateway and connected devices. The free feature, part of Xfinity Shield, can send activity alerts through the Xfinity app and offers Home, Away, and nighttime monitoring modes without requiring separate motion sensors. The Verge reports:
Wi-Fi motion sensing is a technology that has been around for a while, but it’s only recently that it’s become accurate and reliable enough to catch on. Linksys launched a similar service in 2021, but discontinued it a few years later. Lighting company Wiz launched a line of Wi-Fi-sensing smart bulbs in 2023, and more recently Philips Hue deployed a similar radio-frequency sensing technology in its products (using Zigbee rather than Wi-Fi). Comcast’s motion sensing pairs with new modes in the Xfinity app — Home Watch, Away Watch, and Dark Watch (a night/sleep mode) — allowing you to turn sensing on or off based on your activities.

Re:user consent

By rsilvergun • Score: 5, Informative Thread
It’s a paid feature for you to access the data but I would be shocked if they didn’t turn it on without notifying you anywhere except the finest of fine print so that they could sell the data. If all else fails here in America they will want to give the data to the police.

Re:It’s OPT-IN

By rsilvergun • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
It’s 2026 dude. Nobody believes that anymore.

Unless you have laws and they are strictly enforced with extremely harsh penalties companies will do whatever the fuck they want and you have to suck it down. And we stopped passing those kind of laws here in America in the ‘80s when Ronald Reagan took over. The few we had left on the books we stopped and forcing when newt Gingrich started fucking up Congress. And the last of our civil rights got rendered moot when we gave up the courts to a bunch of corrupt fascists.

We are at the final line of defense as far as democracy is concerned. The voters and elections. It is possible because of Trump’s failing Health we might turn that around just barely but it’s pretty touch and go right now.

Comcast TattletaleasaService?

By SomePoorSchmuck • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Is there any legal principle that prevents Comcast from using this to determine the number and size of pets you have, and then selling that data to, say, apartment management companies, HOAs, and municipal code-compliance departments that have restrictions/fines on number/size of pets?

“Find out how we help our partners in large urban markets increase their citation revenues by 19.7%!”
And then Comcast gets 3% of the deposit/fee/citation as profit-sharing, exactly like the red-light camera companies.

Re:user consent

By cruff • Score: 4, Informative Thread
This is why I use my own equipment, Comcast doesn’t get to do things to my WiFi.

Re:user consent

By Powercntrl • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Or they’ll sell the “anonymized data”, including calculated bra sizes.

Supposedly Facebook knows everything about me. They’re running on way more specific information than just “when does he walk around his house in the evening?” You know what kind of ads I keep getting lately? Ones for a ridiculously overpriced e-scooter. I’ve also been getting ads for an 80s cover band made up of two teenagers and their father, for a tour that was in Florida a little over a week ago. It got the liking 80s pop music part right, but it’s way off on my ownership of a time machine and desire to watch Gen A musicians.

I’d be downright thrilled if marketers would actually show me ads for things I genuinely would be interested in, like if Outback ever brings back Bloomin’ Mondays. Really, the worst part about ads is that the targeting algorithm is still absolute horse shit.

Disney, ABC Sue FCC Over Threats to Broadcast Licenses

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Disney and ABC are suing the FCC to block an early review of eight station licenses, arguing the Trump administration is using the agency’s regulatory power to punish the network over programming and editorial decisions it dislikes. Reuters reports:
In a lawsuit (PDF) filed in U.S. District Court in Washington, Disney said the FCC was seeking to coerce and retaliate against “a network that refuses to bow to the administration’s demands,” calling the agency’s actions an “extraordinary assault on free speech.”

Trump has waged an aggressive series of attacks on the news media and the latest move follows a two-year-long battle between Trump and Disney. Last month, Trump again called for ABC stations to lose their licenses because the network refused to air a prime-time speech on elections. The court case will pose a key test of the free speech rights of media outlets. Disney and ABC asked the court (PDF) to quickly issue a temporary restraining order halting the license renewal proceedings and preventing the FCC from scheduling a hearing. The company said the public comment period ended earlier this month and the FCC could act at any time.

The lawsuit alleges that the administration is violating the company’s First Amendment free speech rights, saying that the FCC “is using its regulatory power to retaliate against (Disney and ABC) for programming and editorial decisions the administration dislikes.” The FCC said the move stemmed from a year-long investigation into whether Disney’s diversity policies amounted to unlawful discrimination, an allegation the company denies. U.S. District Judge Loren AliKhan issued an order on Tuesday directing the company and the FCC to propose a schedule for considering the request for a temporary restraining order and told the agency to notify her if it moves to start the process of revoking the ABC licenses.

Re:Beneficial use of the EM spectrum

By ak3ldama • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Dude!! Think about what happened in February - that has to be the most inconsequential and incomplete state of the union speech I can possibly imagine. Within days he attacks Iran and just destroys everything of substance a real state of the union would’ve covered. All the low fuel prices, great economy, poof. Gone. I’m not very old, but I can’t remember a bigger waste of time SotU speech than this one in 2026.
Anyways back on topic I agree w/ sibling AC, nothing Trump/MAGA idiots can say has merit as long as right wing AM talk radio is the most biased ridiculous thing to possibly exist soaking up the “public” air waves. And further, the main stream media IS NOT something of or from the left at all. It’s maybe centrist and maybe right wing/corporate. But it’s not left.
I realized I wasn’t a Republican when I’d listen to right wing talk radio and just get fuming mad at the utter stupidity I’d hear during the Bush and early Obama years. I moved on and listened to NPR. They’re dumb too and say stupid things, but I would get less angry at the radio. And there were less advertisements. I’m still not a Democrat yet, but man, Trump is sure pushing me closer. Where’s the fiscal conservatives at? Where’s the I-hate-Hunter-Biden anti corruption Republicans at? It’s dire.

Re:Beneficial use of the EM spectrum

By ArchieBunker • Score: 5, Informative Thread

The broadcast networks have a First Amendment right to blather as they will subject to the usual rules against incitement to violence and slander.

Haha oh I can see where this is going

However they are using a public good (the spectrum) and as such they have to show a beneficial use. Spewing non-stop lies over the airwaves is not that use. They seem to have forgotten that. There is no right to the spectrum, they can all got back to print where the rules have always been looser (the Hearst newspapers being a traditional example.)

Can you name one of the “non-stop lies” Jimmy Kimmel (or even ABC for that matter) spewed?

It’s just as well that I live in a broadcast dead zone as least as far as TV goes. It definitely cuts down on the amount of hysteria I have to filter.

So your tv has the Fox News logo burned in? Hell even Fox had to admit in court their programming is entertainment and you’re not supposed to actually believe it. https://law.justia.com/cases/f…

Re:socialist left view

By ArchieBunker • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

You. Are. In. A. Cult.

Re:Their real argument

By maladroit • Score: 5, Informative Thread

None of that has anything to do with this extortion by Trump:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…

But if ‘one-sided’ is bad, why is this ok?
“Talk radio isn’t a target of FCC’s ‘equal time’ notice, Brendan Carr says”
https://www.politico.com/news/…

Re:socialist left view

By geekoid • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

That’s actually not true at all. Please tell me how many American FDR called evil? Literally one of the, if not the most socialist president whose social programs led to American become a technological and industrial power house.

American modern conservatives primary planks are to take rights away from marginalized group; which s fucking evil.

Get over yourself and read some books.

Memory Prices Climb 500% In 12 Months

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
RAM prices have exploded over the past year, with some DDR5 kits approaching 500% year-over-year increases and a 128GB kit now selling for $3,399, which is more than 10 times its previous low. Tom’s Hardware reports:
Things improve as you step down the memory capacities and speed tiers, but not as much as we’d like. You’re still looking at $392 for a memory kit that was just $72 last year. To reinforce the point, I pulled the latest average price data from PCPartPicker, comparing where we are today (August 2026) to exactly one year ago. This data is somewhat approximate, but it should be broadly accurate. […] A standard 64GB (2x32GB) DDR5-5600 kit that would have cost you under $200 last summer is now demanding over $1,100. It is a 5x multiplier on a component that used to be a fairly boring and predictable line item in a PC build budget.

If you plan to just wait it out on an older AM4 or LGA1700 motherboard with DDR4, you’d better hope your memory holds out too, because DDR4 isn’t safe from the fallout. With DDR5 entirely out of reach for most builders, the resulting scramble for older platforms running DDR4 memory has created a massive knock-on effect, and as a result, DDR4 kits are up anywhere from 120% to nearly 180% across the board. Nowhere near as bad as DDR5 pricing, but it still stings when a kit that was $105 last year is $281 this year.

This phenomenon is by no means exclusive to the US, either. German tech site ComputerBase have also been tracking this global trend, reporting just this week that average RAM prices in Europe have skyrocketed by 345% compared to September 2025. Their data shows the squeeze is bleeding into other components too, with hard drive and SSD prices both climbing over 125% in that same timeframe. In fact, the situation is so severe that hyperscale buyers have reportedly already locked in almost all of the global DRAM production capacity for 2027, handing over advance deposits to guarantee their supply of precious DRAM, which is now among the highest-value commodities in the world by weight; mainstream DRAM chips are worth over half as much per kilogram as solid gold.

AI doesn’t use desktop hardware including RAM

By couchslug • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Those days are over.

Re:AI doesn’t use desktop hardware including RAM

By Fly Swatter • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
People keep assuming the AI funnel is taking all their ram when the sad fact is that memory manufacturers simply stopped making desktop memory to use the raw materials on purpose built chips for data centers.

Micron shut down their Crucial brand because they knew they would simply not be making anymore of those products.

Re:Thanks, AI bubble!

By karmawarrior • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

No. The hardware being built for AI is basically using hardware that more closely resembles graphic cards minus the DisplayPort output than anything you can pick apart to insert in your PC. Even the memory modules are completely un-DIMM like.

At best, supply will return to pre-AI levels, but that’ll just mean that memory reduces in cost to somewhere between today’s absurd prices and Trump’s post-tariff prices. The chances of it being reduced to Biden levels is pretty low.

Memory is going to be expensive for the foreseeable future. And all because of what’s essentially a con job, an attempt to take over every substantial business in America by making their own employees unable to understand what it is they do, that nobody’s prepared to do anything about.

Re:AI doesn’t use desktop hardware including RAM

By swillden • Score: 5, Informative Thread

People keep assuming the AI funnel is taking all their ram when the sad fact is that memory manufacturers simply stopped making desktop memory to use the raw materials on purpose built chips for data centers.

Not so much the raw materials as the fab space/time, but yes.

We have pretty extensive history of how this goes; there have been a half-dozen DRAM crunches in the last ~40 years. What always happens is that prices explode, manufacturers build out massive new capacity (which takes years, and as fabs have gotten more complex it takes more years), then all the new capacity goes into production at about the same time and RAM prices crater.

And we’re definitely seeing the same processes at work this time. Between Samsung, SK Hynix, TSMC and Micron there’s almost a trillion dollars of new fab construction going on right now. When all of that comes on line, it’s going to provide a massive boost to output… and RAM prices will almost certainly drop precipitously, losing all of the recent gains plus whatever normal decline we’d have expected, plus some more.

When? Probably around 2030. 2029 if we’re lucky, though we might see a little softening by 2028. Definitely not this year and almost certainly not next year.

It could happen faster if the AI bubble bursts before then. I wouldn’t hold my breath.

Re:AI doesn’t use desktop hardware including RAM

By thegarbz • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

No, that is exactly what happened. The RAM companies were given lots of money to make HBM not desktop/server DDR5. If there is a glut of unsold HBM, it is not likely that HBM can be used in desktops and servers.

No. You don’t seem to be understanding what is driving the market price. Or maybe you’re following a confusing thread. If you’re on the OP’s train of thought, then yes absolutely, the cheap hardware from any AI datacentre collapse cannot be used by consumers.

But the GP was talking about abandoning of the consumer market and pointed to Micron dropping Crucial. That is what I was referring to as being incorrect. That’s just one packager not putting RAM on DIMMs. The actual DRAM module price is driven by *FUTURE* orders. When the AI bubble pops, those orders will go unfilled and RAM production will quickly shift from HBM to DRAM (they are technologically very similar, so you’re talking days / weeks for production to shift back).

There won’t be any unsold HBM, HBMs do not have their own dedicated production facility. There’ll be a quick shift back to consumers, and RAM prices will come down and all those brands you know and love (except for Crucial) will be there.

You Can Finally Buy a Fairphone In the US

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Wired:
Your iPhone, SamsungGalaxy, andGoogle Pixel have a 1-year warranty. Unless you cough up extra dough for an extended service plan, you’ll pay a hefty fee if you damage the screen and need a replacement (around $329 for an iPhone 17 done directly from Apple). But it doesn’t have to be this way. What if you could order the part from the manufacturer and do the repair yourself? That dream is finally being realized for American consumers, thanks to Fairphone.

The Dutch company is bringing its repairable and sustainably built Android smartphone — the Fairphone (Gen 6+) — to the US. Each one comes with a screwdriver. A replacement screen from Fairphone costs just $90. A new USB-C port is $20. A fresh battery is $40. In all, there are 12 modular elements you can swap yourself. It remains the only smartphone series with a 10/10 repairability scorefrom iFixit, not to mention an unmatched 5-year warranty and software updates through 2033.

The new Fairphone (Gen 6+) is a small upgrade over the Gen 6 that the company launched last year. It has a newer Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 processor and double the RAM at 12 GB, but is otherwise largely the same device (hence the “plus” in the name). It now comes in Cobalt Blue, a nod to the miners who extract the cobalt used to make phone batteries, and the company’s efforts to improve working conditions in mines in the Democratic Republic of Congo. The new Fairphone is available on Amazon and at Fairphone.com for $650, and it’s officially certified to work on T-Mobile and AT&T’s networks.
While this will mark the U.S. debut of its flagship smartphone, the company first entered the stateside market last year with its repairable earbuds and headphones. It also plans to launch its next-generation Fairbuds 2 wireless earbuds later this year.

Thanks

By medusa-v2 • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Nice timing. Yesterday I was looking at de-googled variations of the plain 6 from Murena but the old version didn’t support my carrier. This one will.

Maybe the important detail is that for folks who want to dump google, you can also go that route at https://murena.com/america/sho… : I guess that makes me a shill but I’m just in it out of a general sense that google went traitor back in the day.

Not compatible with all 3 carriers

By Powercntrl • Score: 5, Informative Thread

The Fairphone’s carrier compatibility page lists carrier compatibility as being quite a bit lacking, unless your carrier is T-Mobile postpaid, AT&T postpaid or a T-Mobile MVNO.

I jumped ship from T-Mobile to Visible because of T-Mobile’s recent price increases, and this phone may as well be a brick as far as Verizon’s network is concerned.

Re: Very happy with my Fairphone

By SnotMelon • Score: 4, Informative Thread
Indeed. I’ve had my Fairphone 4 for 3 years now. Still works fine for what I need. Battery is beggining to degrade, but just checked and a replacement from the the official fairphone shop is £25.95, so I’ll probs upgrade that soon. It beats buying a knock-off “genuine” battery from Amazon for 3 times the price.

Re: Not compatible with all 3 carriers

By Powercntrl • Score: 4, Informative Thread

I would like to know if this phone will work in Verizon prepaid because I am in the market for a new phone.

The Fairphone is incompatible with Verizon, per their carrier compatibility page.

Re:Not compatible with all 3 carriers

By Powercntrl • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Why distinguish postpaid from prepaid? If a phone supports post paid should it not also support prepaid?

I’m just going by what they wrote on their carrier compatibility page. One of the other important things to note is that RCS is not supported on AT&T. I’d argue that without RCS, this is effectively a T-Mobile/T-Mobile MVNO only phone. That isn’t exactly a minor feature to be giving up.

Google Buys All of Spirit Airlines’ Data to Feed Its AI Models

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Google has agreed to pay $10 million for a massive trove of anonymized Spirit Airlines data following the carrier’s shutdown, including internal communications, spreadsheets, booking and frequent-flyer records, transactions, and employee information. CNN reports:
Did you ever fly on Spirit Airlines? Or work there? Or send an email to someone who worked there? Then your information will soon be feeding Google’s artificial intelligence model. The discount airline halted all operations in May, and it’s been selling off its remaining assets through the bankruptcy process ever since. While most of that is planes, equipment, and real estate, there’s other things that are valuable, too.

It was disclosed late Monday that the company agreed to sell its data to Google for $10 million. That includes emails and internal communications, spreadsheets, transactions with the public including bookings and frequent flyer information as well as human resources information on its employees. The data has been stripped of anything that would allow individuals to be identified, according to the court filing. But it is still a massive amount of useful intelligence.

Re:Can’t wait for a story about failed anonymizati

By Registered Coward v2 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

You know it’s going to happen - someone in charge of replacing/stripping all the names and replacing them with numbers, or whatever, is going to fail at some level. A bunch of PII will go into Gemini, and they won’t be able to sue Spirit, because they won’t exist, and Google will definitely make sure their contract excuses them from any liability.

Even if it would be truly anonymized, once combined with th other vast amounts od data Google has means it is possible to tie the anonymized data to specific, or a plausible group of people.A bad anonymizing process would be a far more likely culprit, but by analyzing patterns, something AI and computers are good at, could yield interesting results.

Okay, but

By fropenn • Score: 5, Funny Thread
Knowing Spirit airlines, the data will be delivered six hours late, to the wrong destination, missing its codebook (which somehow got rerouted to Dallas), and the data will be hot, tired, thirsty, and extremely pissed off.

I pity the fool who does business with Spirit.

Re:Now We Know

By thegarbz • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Time for the Lawyers to use this metric to go after every single data breach.

Hardly. Unfortunately not all data breaches are the same, and neither is the value for people. The value of data to someone who is using it for extortion is different than for someone using it for impersonation, is different from someone using it to feed it to their AI.

$10million isn’t an open market price. It’s what one company thought *that* data was worth to them.

So let me get this straight…

By roc97007 • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

So.... Google is using data from a bankrupt airline that had customer service and reliability problems through most of its life?

And people are going to be using AI trained on that data?

What’s their motto, “Share and Enjoy”?

How to bankrupt an airline

By sziring • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

So they are training AI on how to bankrupt a company.

Apple Lowers App Store Fees In Europe to Settle Dispute With EU

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Apple is overhauling its EU App Store fees to settle its Digital Markets Act dispute, simplifying the fee structure and "[resolving] Apple’s disagreements with the Commission over business terms and alternative distribution.” Developers can sign the new terms starting today, and the changes go into effect on October 1. MacRumors reports:
The initial acquisition fee and store services fee are being removed for apps distributed outside of the App Store, and Apple will now charge a 5% Core Technology Commission on digital purchases that replaces the prior per-install Core Technology Fee. Commission rates are changing for App Store apps, alternative payments, and apps distributed through alternative app marketplaces or the web.

Developers can offer in-app purchase options alongside alternative payment options in the EU, which is something Apple did not allow before. Apple says there will be presentation requirements so users have a consistent, transparent experience. Developers distributing apps in the EU must select their payment options and maintain those options for 12 months before making changes to “provide consistency and clarity for users.” Apple will still use a Notarization process for apps downloadable through the web and through alternative app marketplaces.

Apps in the Kids category or being used by children under 13 will not include links to websites to complete transactions. All apps that use alternative payment processing or link to a website for transactions have to include a parental gate if the user is under 18. Apple is relaxing the rules for operating an alternative app marketplace.

And yet

By Bahbus • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Apple still doesn’t offer anything that is deserving of the 5%. They are still double dipping on developers by charging them yearly fees on top of a commission of each sale, while providing nothing but hosting and distribution. The ‘tools’ they provide are nothing special or unique.

Microsoft MVP Creates Site to Remind You of All the Brands Redmond Replaced

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Microsoft MVP Loryan Strant has created the Microsoft Rebrand Registry, cataloging 72 Microsoft products and the 158 names they’ve had over the years. His analysis finds that Microsoft product names survive an average of two years and eleven months. The site even predicts which products are most likely to get renamed next, “by considering the amount of time the current name has applied, prior names, and the frequency with which Microsoft changes names of products in the same family,” reports The Register. “That methodology led him to suggest an ‘elevated’ likelihood of name changes for the Azure App Service, Azure SQL Database, Azure DevOps, and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Field Service.” From the report:
Readers may remember that Strant has also created the site Let Me Correct That For You, which lists the exact names of Microsoft products — an effort he told The Register he thinks is useful because Microsoft in its wisdom uses Camel Case for names like PowerPoint but went with conventional capitalization for Copilot.

Another of his sites immortalizes Microsoft cloud product logos. He’s also created HumbledandHonored.com, a site that generates social media posts MVPs can use to announce they have earned or retained Microsoft’s awards.

Strant told The Register that the Rebrand Registry came about after some banter between himself and other MVPs, during which the topic of Microsoft’s many product name changes came up. He decided to do something about it.

Bob, Rover, Merlin, Clippy, Cortana, Copilot

By xack • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
Same annoying feature that interrupts you, many different names. The algorithm changes, but the anger of its presence remains the same.

Absolutely

By TwistedGreen • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

This is a sign that there are way too many middle-management types whose only contribution can be pointless cosmetic changes.

“Can we get it in cornflower blue?”

Nothing wrong with rebranding.

By Locke2005 • Score: 3 Thread
To Microsoft’s credit, they have done an excellent job of buying good hardware manufacturers. The entire Surface group at Microsoft is built on improving the products of hardware companies Microsoft bought. Ok, XBox was developed in-house, so they didn’t buy all their good hardware from others.

“Microsoft Power Cloud”

By Tablizer • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

that’s where all the products & names are gradually converging, like a giant stench-filled black hole.

India Paves the Way For Charging Merchants a Fee On UPI Transactions

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot
An anonymous reader quotes a report from the BBC:
For most Indians, paying by Unified Payments Interface (UPI) has become almost absurdly routine. Scan a QR code, tap a few buttons and the money moves instantly. There is no card machine, no cash, and — most importantly — for the user, no visible fee. That may be about to change. India has paved the way for banks and payment companies to charge merchants a fee on UPI transactions, potentially ending a decade-long experiment in free digital payments.

The government has yet to decide the rate or exactly where it will apply, but proposals under discussion include a merchant discount rate (MDR) of 0.3-0.5% — a small fee paid by a business to the banks and payment companies that process its UPI payments — on larger transactions at big businesses. The government says consumers and person-to-person UPI payments will remain free. If merchant fees are introduced, they will apply only to some transactions above a set threshold, at a nominal rate, meaning most UPI payments will remain free. The question is whether putting a price on UPI could weaken the network that made it such a success.

The stakes are enormous. Launched in 2016, UPI has grown into one of the world’s biggest real-time payment networks. According to official data, in July alone, there were 23.6 billion UPI transactions worth 29.87 trillion rupees ($313.5 billion). Fintech apps such as PhonePe and Google Pay account for most UPI payments. In the financial year just ended, the figure was about 241.6 billion transactions — almost 12,000 times the volume in UPI’s first full year. More than 550 million people now use it, and the system is now available in some form for payments in 11 countries outside India.
India’s UPI became ubiquitous partly because it made digital payments almost frictionless for merchants, including small vendors who can accept payments with little more than a QR code. New research suggests that merchant acceptance was “not just a result of UPI growth, but one of its key drivers.”
As RBI governor Sanjay Malhotra put it, “Someone will have to pay the cost.” The challenge will be making UPI sustainable without weakening the merchant network that helped it take off.

Re:Typical.

By TWX • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

It’s fairly simple. If it’s that important as service, use government tax revenue to fund its function. If a hot economy is what they want and this helps the money flow, let the rich who can afford the taxes and benefit the most off of that hot economy pay for the privilege.

US pressure is drivin this more than anything else

By avatar8008 • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Follow the money… UPI has blown VISA and MasterCard into almost oblivion in India. The reason this is happening now is that India is trying to negotiate a trade deal with the US and making UPI less attractive to the public is the only way for VISA and MasterCard to get a look in, so the US trade negotiators are pushing for this.

Re:Typical.

By junglee_iitk • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

It is very clear how to sustainably pay for - India isn’t going bankrupt wiping fees off UPI.

The problem is that free UPI is infinitely better than Visa and Mastercard and Trump doesn’t like it, so he creates problems for the biggest industrialists that fund the current Indian government i.e. Adani, so Modi has to find a way to make Adani happy again.

Something that doesn’t find any mention in the reliable western media.

Re: Typical.

By superposed • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

I think the problem is that the first step is actually “Make an expensive system that’s free to use, that we don’t know how to sustainably pay for.”

I don’t buy it. They’ve made it to massive scale without anyone going bankrupt; clearly no one is paying 0.3% of every transaction ($100 billion/year) to keep the current system afloat. The internet itself is evidence that you can have billions of secure, complex transactions where each party just pays a minimal amount for access to the network and no third party needs to be paid for every transaction (roughly $0.06 for a couple hundred bytes in this case).

This is just banks trying to muscle in on some nice-looking transactions.

Re:Really late in the process of rollout

By PIC16F628 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

If we compare the cost of paper money - the printing, distribution, lockers, security .... Who bears that cost? Why can’t the same approach be applied to digital circulation? As others have pointed out, this feels like appeasing the US in trade negotiations rather than burden of running the infra.