Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Astronauts Take First X-Rays In Space
  2. House Votes For Permanent Daylight Saving Time
  3. Iran Abused Mobile Networks’ Vulnerabilities To Locate US Military In Middle East
  4. OpenAI’s First Device Will Be Moveable, Screenless Speaker Built as AI Companion
  5. Google Images Gets a Pinterest-Like Redesign Focused On Discovery
  6. Lawsuit Claims Meta’s Layoff Decisions Were Made By AI, Not Humans
  7. Google DeepMind Calls For US To Spearhead AI Standards Body
  8. Linux Foundation’s Latest Foray Is To Standardize Internet-Native Payments For AI Agents
  9. OnePlus Is Reportedly Shutting Down In the US, Europe
  10. IBM Stock Collapses After a Grave Warning About AI
  11. New York Becomes First State To Impose Data Center Moratorium
  12. StubHub, CEO Hit With ‘Deceptive Practices’ Class Action Over Mass Scalping
  13. Indian Scientists Produce Most Detailed 3D Atlas of the Human Brainstem
  14. Scientists Find Sugar Deep In Our Galaxy
  15. Over 200 Economists Say ‘We Must Act Now’ On AI’s Economic Impact

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Astronauts Take First X-Rays In Space

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Astronauts on SpaceX’s Fram2 mission successfully captured diagnostic X-ray images in orbit for the first time. The milestone gives space medicine a second imaging option beyond ultrasound and could help future crews diagnose injuries, inspect equipment, and support longer missions to the moon or beyond. Popular Science reports:
Commercial off-the-shelf X-ray machines like the ice cooler-sized MinXray TR90BH now allow users to perform scans on subjects far away from traditional facilities. In 2022, [Mayo Clinic researcher Sheyna Gifford] assisted in preparing a crew to successfully generate digital X-rays while experiencing microgravity during a parabolic flight. Gifford’s team then spent years collaborating with SpaceX to plan another feasibility study. This time, they didn’t want to operate an X-ray machine aboard an aircraft simulating the conditions in space — they intended to use the equipment during an orbital mission.

The process was detailed in a recently published study in the journal Radiology, and focuses on last year’s Fram2 mission. Instead of days of medical training, astronauts spent only four hours learning how to use their portable radiography device. They then took preflight X-rays of a hand, forearm, chest, abdomen, and pelvis ahead of their SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket launch on March 31, 2025. Once in orbit, the team calibrated the system before testing their MinXray on the same body parts as well as a smartwatch.

Once the crew returned, a trio of independent radiologists reviewed the orbital X-ray images based on their positioning, spatial and contrast resolutions, and general scan quality. Although positioning scores were slightly decreased for the central body images, every other scan held up to similar examples created on Earth. Meanwhile, the astronauts reported that using the machine was easy despite minimal prior coaching. Looking ahead, researchers hope to conduct further X-ray tests during orbital missions, while continuing to reduce the overall size of equipment.

Dosage

By necro81 • Score: 3 Thread
Medical x-ray equipment these days requires less radiation exposure than in years past. Still, it is a radiation dose on top of what space crews are already experiencing. NASA guidelines limit astronauts to 600 millisieverts (mSv) for their whole flight career, and 250 mSv for an acute event (e.g., a solar storm). They estimate a 6-month stay on the ISS could be 77-86 mSv, depending on solar conditions. By comparison, living on the surface of the Earth will dose about 3 mSv/yr.

A typical chest x-ray is about 0.1 mSv. So not nothing, but also not a huge amount, even if they did 10 images in quick succession. And weighed against the medical diagnostic benefit, it’s probably a decent tradeoff.

House Votes For Permanent Daylight Saving Time

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
The House voted 308-117 to pass the Sunshine Protection Act, which would make daylight saving time permanent nationwide and end the twice-yearly clock change. The bill faces an uncertain future in the Senate, “where one G.O.P. leader said it was unclear whether it could move ahead and at least one Republican appears inclined to try to block it,” reports The New York Times. Some sleep experts oppose permanent daylight saving time, arguing that year-round standard time better aligns with circadian rhythms and winter morning safety. The New York Times reports:
President Trump has championed the effort to save an extra hour of daylight before nightfall and make the time zone permanent, describing the ritual of moving clocks forward in the spring and back in the fall a “ridiculous, twice yearly production.” “We are going with the far more popular alternative, Saving Daylight, which gives you a longer, brighter Day,” Mr. Trump wrote in a social media post in May. “And who can be against that.”

A sizable bloc of Florida Republicans in Congress is leading the charge on legislation that would do just that, mandating daylight saving time nationwide for the entire year. Representative Vern Buchanan of the Tampa Bay area is backing the bill, and Representative Anna Paulina Luna, another Tampa Bay-area Republican, cosponsored it. House leaders agreed to allow a vote on the measure this week as a sweetener for Ms. Luna in their efforts to persuade her to lift a legislative blockade she had maintained as she sought to force Senate action on a voting restriction bill Mr. Trump has championed.

DST is Dumb

By GeorgeMaverick • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
If Daylight Saving’s Time did not exist currently and it was proposed as a new concept it would never be adopted.

Keep the time constant, school and work hours can be adjusted twice or so a year if wanted.

Re:They should do the same in The Netherlands

By Sique • Score: 5, Informative Thread
If the Netherlands did this, they would reverse it immediately after the first winter. Not getting any sunlight until past 10.00 AM is so annoying, and the cost of road maintenance because rush hours is when everywhere, there is still ice on the roads, will be prohibitive.

People complaining have simply no clue how it is to have DST in the winter, and can’t imagine.

Re:DST is Dumb

By SteelCamel • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Except that when you get a bit further from the equator, it goes back to being “dumb”. There’s not enough winter daylight to go round no matter how you play with the clocks. Scotland only has six hours of daylight in the winter - so you’re either going to work in the dark or coming home in the dark. And unless you’re only going to sleep four hours a night, you’ll be sleeping when it’s full daylight for much of the summer. Changing the clock gets a brief respite in spring and autumn, but only for a couple of weeks before the sun overtakes the clock again.

Re:DST is Dumb

By dargaud • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
I used to work in Antarctica. One summer on a new station in the center authorities decided to put us on the same time as the big coastal station, saying that we had sun 24/7 anyway so it wouldn’t matter. The idea was to synchronize communication with the head station. Well, the sun still has daily ups and downs, so we had to get up when the sun was lowest and start work when it was the fucking coldest at -50C and we’d go to bed when it was a balmy -20C. After a few days of that we started getting up and start work later and later, until we’d start work at 2pm or so !!!
The next year we had our own timezone.

Wait!

By Ol Olsoc • Score: 4, Funny Thread
This 1 hour Daylight Savings time is a pitiful excuse and example of liberal claptrap! We need to have our leaders take the real vote. As the Trump flags tell us NO MORE BULLSHIT we deserve nothing less than 24 hour daylight. We are in a new age of perfect governance, and we can force the sun to stop taking the night off. 24 7/365 sunshine across the earth in all places.

We have the political will, we have the military might, make it happen. Nuke the sun if it doesn’t comply/

Iran Abused Mobile Networks’ Vulnerabilities To Locate US Military In Middle East

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from TechCrunch:
The Iranian government abused well-known vulnerabilities in the global telecoms infrastructure to locate U.S. military personnel in the build-up to the Iran War, as well as in the early days of the conflict, according to Financial Times. The Iranian government exploited Signaling System 7, or SS7, a set of protocols for 2G and 3G networks that has long been the backbone of how cellular networks connect to each other to route subscribers’ calls and texts around the world, the newspaper reported, citing research by the Mobile Surveillance Monitor, as well as anonymous government officials with knowledge of the spy campaign.

Intelligence agencies have long abused SS7 to track cellphones abroad, which is what happened in this campaign. Using this technique, Iran was reportedly able to locate U.S. military forces stationed in military bases as well as hotels in Iraq, Bahrain, and other countries in the Middle East, which allowed the regime to strike them. These attacks resulted in several injuries. Apart from SS7, Iran also abused advertising technology used to serve tailored ads to cellphone users, another well-known surveillance technique that relies on everyday technology.

Wahhh!

By locater16 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
People we don’t like “abused” the thing we were abusing, that’s not fair, make them stop, make them stop in a way that allows us to keep abusing the same thing, waaahhh!

Israel probably

By detritus. • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Israel has been known to abuse the ss7 network in the United States and spying on our own government personnel. I doubt Iran did this. I’m far likely to believe it was an Israeli attempt to get the United States to strike Iran.

Backdoors can and will be used against you…

By sleschdott • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Backdoors can and will be used against you… regardless of your original intentions when mandating them.

Re:DJT, stuck in a war of his own making

By sit1963nz • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
More so the USA long term as more of the world financially decouples from the USA.
And even when the fat man has fallen off his perch things will not “go back to how they used to be” , the world has already decided it will never been under control of the USA again.

Re:Code is law.

By AleRunner • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

If the code allows it, it’s not abuse.

That’s actually pretty much a fair comment. A number of the mobile systems were originally designed to be more secure than they were finally delivered. GSM in particular. These systems then had security removed from them and monitoring added in during standardization according to American (and later European and other) requests. Probably what Iran has done to kill American soldiers are things that could have been eliminated from the mobile communication standards if the security agencies had been putting a priority on protecting us over spying.

This is a key reminder for us that when NSA and GCHQ demand that the security of systems is weakened they are doing the opposite of their jobs. They are endangering both American and British military people alongside also endangering civilians and allied military people worldwide. They are taking time from experts who should be spending it looking for vulnerabilities and building more secure systems. They are using that time to introduce weaknesses, for example getting rid of end to end encryption and adding in global identifiers, which also make the job of securing the system much more complex.

This isn’t just an American problem. Europe’s new Chat Control 2.0 is the same idea. There are pre-image attacks where you can make child porn which matches the image-hash of the material you want to track. Russia and Iran will be able to use those pre-image attacks to track people who have their secret materials.

Calling this “abuse” is misleading. It’s just Iran using weaknesses that our security services left in the systems, wanting to be able to use themselves and which Iran then discovered.

OpenAI’s First Device Will Be Moveable, Screenless Speaker Built as AI Companion

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
OpenAI is reportedly developing a screen-free, portable smart speaker meant to act as a personalized home computer and humanlike AI companion. “It will help control smart-home appliances, play media, answer questions, respond to messages and tap into the range of capabilities offered by OpenAI’s ChatGPT,” reports Bloomberg, citing people familiar with the matter. The device, expected to be unveiled this year and released in 2027, would mark OpenAI’s first major hardware push after acquiring Jony Ive’s io Products. Bloomberg reports:
Apple sued OpenAI last week, accusing the company of stealing trade secrets. But OpenAI believes that the device veers significantly from anything Apple has on the market today and that it’s unlikely that it violates trade secrets belonging to the iPhone maker, the people said. OpenAI’s success in hardware will hinge on bringing a novel approach to the market — something it aims to do with the smart speaker. For instance, the device’s technology is meant to become increasingly personalized and proactive as it gains a deeper understanding of its owner over time, according to the people.

OpenAI envisions the device anticipating needs, surfacing information proactively and serving as an expert on its user, they said. Though the speaker is designed to stay in the home, it will be easy to move around the house. OpenAI believes the product’s defining feature will be its personality and ability to connect on a humanlike level with users. The speaker incorporates mechanical elements that can move on their own, creating a sense that it is alive and not just an object responding to commands. The machine also will draw on personal information such as emails to better understand its owner. The goal is for the device to feel like a companion and become a physical manifestation of OpenAI’s ChatGPT. Still, the exact plans could change as the company works through the development and legal process.

The device’s communication abilities will rely on a more advanced version of the ChatGPT Voice Mode — GPT-Live — that OpenAI rolled out this month. The new voice mode is designed to act more like a human. It can listen and talk at the same time, adapt more naturally during conversations, and quickly process information. Though the new product resembles a speaker, OpenAI internally describes it as the first of its kind: a computer built for AI to help make busy people more productive. It includes a camera and other sensors that help it understand a user’s surroundings and context, as well as advanced AI models beyond those available on conventional smart speakers. Another central difference is that the device includes a rechargeable battery, allowing it to be carried from room to room throughout the day. A user could bring it into the laundry room while doing chores, move it into the kitchen for cooking assistance, and later place it in a living room or bedroom to have it play music. It can also remain plugged into a single room if the customer chooses.

Not very “Innovative”

By Turkinolith • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Great, just what we needed. ANOTHER “Alexa” type of always listening speaker device.

Creepy animatronic HomePod?

By ihadafivedigituid • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Yeah, not installing a home surveillance device where I am the product. Especially if sama is behind it.

Even if the features appealed…

By Junta • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Why would I want a device that deliberately handicaps itself by not bothering to have a screen?

Especially with how verbose AI responses are, I couldn’t imagine having to just wait for it to read out the information asked of it.

I don’t get the AI companies’ fascination with voice-only input and audio-only output. It’s a strict subset of what the device in people’s hands can already do. Further, every single product that has aimed for this has flopped and you would think they would get the hint by now…

Re:Not very “Innovative”

By 93 Escort Wagon • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Great, just what we needed. ANOTHER “Alexa” type of always listening speaker device.

* NOW with extra evil!! *

Re:what?

By Morromist • Score: 5, Funny Thread

I can kinda see what they’re thinking:

“we could make it a phone app but we want to sell a physical object, and if it was just a thing with a screen it might as well be an app, so we’ll make it a speaker, which could also be an app, but is sorta more divorced from the phone I guess. HEY get off our backs we don’t have any new ideas, we just need to keep building the possibility we may become a huge apple-like company by saying we’re developing this device WHICH WILL BE REVOLUTIONARY. Also old people don’t know how to use AI -or phones really- but they sure as hell know how to yell at smart speakers!”

Google Images Gets a Pinterest-Like Redesign Focused On Discovery

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Google Images is getting a Pinterest-like redesign that turns image search into a personalized discovery feed, with “For You” galleries, real-time updates, and collections for saving visual ideas. “Google is also adding a way for users to create AI images right in Search, as it celebrates 25 years since the debut of Google Images,” reports TechCrunch. From the report:
After navigating to the redesigned Google Images, users will see a “For You” gallery of images tailored to their interests and browsing history. Like Pinterest, the gallery is designed for continuous browsing, with Google saying it updates in real time with new images. As users browse, they can save ideas to their “collections,” which will appear as tabs above the main gallery of photos. For example, users can create collections for things like vacation outfit ideas, travel inspiration, and ways to design a reading nook, which they can come back to later.

[…] As for generating images directly in Search, Google says the feature is meant for moments when you have a highly specific idea for an image that doesn’t already exist online. Google is bringing image generation directly into AI Overviews on Search and will use its latest Nano Banana model to transform a text prompt into a custom visual. The feature can also help users reimagine spaces and visualize ideas, such as seeing what a room might look like painted red or what a dorm room with a coastal theme could look like.

Pinterest ruined Google’s image search

By SoCalChris • Score: 3, Insightful Thread

JFC, Pinterest absolutely ruined Google’s image search results years ago. Now they’re trying to emulate that?

Anybody have any better alternatives?

Wrong discovery

By devslash0 • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

The only discovery they should be focusing on is making it easier for me to find the exact image I’m looking for.

Lawsuit Claims Meta’s Layoff Decisions Were Made By AI, Not Humans

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
A lawsuit from 26 Meta employees alleges the company used AI-driven scoring and monitoring systems to select workers for layoffs, disproportionately targeting employees with disabilities or those who had taken protected medical, family, pregnancy, or parental leave. “Meta did not assemble the termination list through the considered judgment of managers who knew the work. Instead, Meta used a constellation of internal artificial-intelligence systems — including a system referred to internally as ‘Metamate,’ employee-trained ‘second-brain’ agents, keystroke- and activity-monitoring data, AI-token-usage dashboards, and algorithmically assisted performance ranking and calibration — to score, rank, and select employees for inclusion on the list,” the lawsuit (PDF) said. Ars Technica reports:
Employees were allegedly graded, among other things, on how much they used Meta’s AI tools. “Meta’s internal dashboards classified employees by their stage of adoption of its artificial-intelligence tools, using categories such as ‘AI Native,’ ‘AI First,’ and ‘AI Enabled,’" the lawsuit said. The lawsuit is apparently “the first against a major U.S. company to challenge the alleged use of AI in conducting layoffs,” according to Reuters. The complaint alleges that Meta’s tools for monitoring employees did not account for differences caused by disabilities and protected leaves. “Those tools draw on inputs — performance ratings, calibration scores, productivity and output metrics, ‘AI-native’ ratings, and AI-token consumption — that, by design, cannot be accumulated by an employee who is on protected medical or family leave, or whose output is reduced by a disability,” the lawsuit said.

The lawsuit alleged that Meta management did not take steps to adjust scores for employees who took leave or who requested reasonable accommodations for disabilities. “Meta did not neutralize those inputs for protected leave; did not exclude protected-leave-takers or accommodation-seekers from the selection cohort; and did not pause the system for the individualized, leave- and accommodation-neutral review that the law requires,” the complaint alleged. “The result was that employees who took protected leaves were disproportionately selected for layoff, based on scoring that not only failed to account for their protected leaves, but in effect penalized the employees for exercising their legal rights to these leaves.” The 26 plaintiffs requested leaves or disability accommodations in the 24 months before being selected for layoffs, the lawsuit said. The layoffs are not yet finalized, but employees are scheduled to start losing their jobs on July 22, the lawsuit said.
“These claims lack merit and are not based on facts,” said Meta in a statement. “Workforce management and organizational decisions were and are made by people, not AI.”

So their AI was just Deloitte or PwC

By geek • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

This is exactly what companies like PwC come in and do. The AI just did it faster.

Correction:

By Sebby • Score: 5, Funny Thread

“These claims lack merit and are not based on facts,” said Meta in a statement. “Workforce management and organizational decisions were and are made by people, not AI.”

“These claims lack merit and are not based on facts,” said Meta’s AI bot in a statement. “Workforce management and organizational decisions were and are made by people, not AI.”

There FTFY.

What goes around

By Himmy32 • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Working for a business that has captured, analyzed, and commoditized the personal data of the general public, then having those company algorithms come back to bite the workers who enabled the system is mildly poetic, but still a depressing step in the march to a dystopian future.

Re:Hard to see Meta Losing

By Dragonslicer • Score: 5, Informative Thread

The employees have to prove that their protected status was targeted to win, and that is a pretty tough sell IMO. It seems like the protected status was more of a side effect of “performance.”

Not at all. If they use a metric of “Worked at least X hours in the past 12 months”, and a person worked fewer than X hours because they were on parental leave, firing them would not be a “side effect of performance”, it would be a direct violation of their legal protection.

Re:Meta

By A nonymous Coward • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

They sold their souls. Now they want them back. I am low on sympathy.

Google DeepMind Calls For US To Spearhead AI Standards Body

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Google DeepMind chief Demis Hassabis is calling for a U.S.-led AI standards body to review frontier models for national security risks such as cybersecurity and biological threats. His proposal would create a federally overseen public-private organization, initially voluntary and eventually mandatory for U.S. deployment. CNBC reports:
Google DeepMind boss Demis Hassabis, a Nobel laureate, said in an article posted on X on Tuesday that “urgent action” was needed to address risks associated with artificial general intelligence (AGI) — the point at which AI matches or surpasses human intelligence. “We’ve already seen the challenges frontier models pose for cybersecurity, and other threats including nuclear and bio risks may soon emerge as capabilities continue to advance,” he said.

[…] Hassabis said the U.S. was well positioned to lead in developing an AI framework “given its economic and technical standing.” “It could establish a new Standards Body modelled on a federally overseen public-private partnership or self-regulatory organisation, much like the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), with a board that includes independent leading technical experts and open-source representatives,” he added. FINRA regulates brokerage firms and exchange markets in the U.S.

The proposed body would need “substantial” funding “in order to attract world-class technical talent and provide the necessary compute resources for large-scale testing,” Hassabis said. Funding would “likely” come from industry, he added. Frontier labs would initially voluntarily share models with the body for review up to 30 days before release, before becoming mandatory for deployment in the U.S. market after being shown to be “effective.” “Specific agentic AI tests could look for attempts to bypass safety guardrails or signs of deception, and ensure best practices, such as digitally watermarking AI-generated images and generating human-readable output tokens to understand model reasoning,” Hassabis said.
Further reading: Over 200 Economists Say ‘We Must Act Now’ On AI’s Economic Impact

Re:Oh fuck right off

By nightflameauto • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Your shitty chat bot is not a national security risk.

This is about pulling up the ladder behind themselves. Create enough bureaucratic hurdles that new players can’t get a foot in the door and it’s a win for the already established players. They are either feeling like they’re doing good enough to make this effort worthwhile, or they see someone nipping at their heels that may get thrown off-course if they set up the correct set of barriers right now.

Either way, they’re calling for this during an administration that is known to drop any barrier for someone or some company willing to praise the man in the White House, or throw some gifts at him, or outright bribe him. So AI will become an even more outright rich man’s game. And onward we spiral. You’d think the toilet would finish its flush at some point, but thus far we’re still teetering on the edge.

Demis Hassabis is a scientist

By oumuamua • Score: 3 Thread
He is the real deal and doesn’t do marketing bullshit. These researchers are seeing the models a good 6 months before you get them AND they seem them before they are dumbed down with safety restrictions. Someone should probably submit this new paper in the submissions que: From AGI to ASI https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.126…
It means we already have AGI and are moving beyond it.

Re: Demis Hassabis is a scientist

By liqu1d • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
They’ve been saying this shit for years now though. It’s always 6 months away we promise, then another 6 months then another. I’m not saying this guy is full of shit but I’m sure many would be happy to say anything to keep such income.

Re:oh look

By cusco • Score: 4, Informative Thread

They’re desperately trying to keep the Chinese models out, but I doubt they’ll be successful. Chinese AI is mostly outcome-based, they train a bot to wash dishes, a drone to recognize an insect infestation, or mining machinery to find and follow a vein, and equipment purchased from China is going to come with their AI baked in. Sure, they’ll play with chatbots and AGI, but most of their work is devoted to actually accomplishing something besides stock manipulation. Once Chinese AI is seeded throughout the economy in machinery and devices more advanced systems are going to follow.

What happens when

By sit1963nz • Score: 3 Thread
The rest of the world says “No” to the USA and its demand for control.

96% of the worlds population does not live in the USA, and I can see no good reason to let the 4% run by a pedo dictate anything to anyone.
The US is firmly US first and US only and no treaty seems to survive a ketchup involved temper tantrum , so why try.

Linux Foundation’s Latest Foray Is To Standardize Internet-Native Payments For AI Agents

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Today, the Linux Foundation launched the x402 Foundation to standardize internet-native payments for AI agents, APIs, and applications, based on Coinbase’s contributed x402 protocol. Backed by companies including AWS, American Express, Cloudflare, Google, Mastercard, Stripe, and Visa, the effort aims to make payments work directly over HTTP (assuming users are comfortable letting AI agents handle financial transactions).

“The whole idea is to give agents access to money and, through that financial independence, improve their set of capabilities to pretty much anything on the internet,” Lincoln Murr, Coinbase’s AI product lead, told CNBC last month when the company announced the protocol. “In the 2010s, every internet company dealt with the transition from desktop and web into a mobile environment. And now in the late 2020s, we’re seeing the exact same thing happen where agents are going to be the new primary economic actors on the internet.”

I have an idea

By CEC-P • Score: 3 Thread
Name it Copyright Violation Coin and put it on the blockchain! Btw, AI agents are the most gullible things I have ever seen, except the scrapers that grab the data are even worse. Not only do they suffer from nonstop version confusion, quoting 5 different steps to fix an HP printer from 5 different generations that had 5 different menu structures, but they’re susceptible to “ai tar pit traps.” Now imagine it’s one you charge for. And per-page it has an AI generating fake-ish data for the other AI to scrape. This will not work!

Re:Reason AI agents want “access to money”

By Himmy32 • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

The future no one predicted is when Claude buys you lube paid in Crypto to delivered by Amazon drone when he sees you open your browser. It’s weird that with something like OpenClaw that something like this isn’t a joke anymore.

OnePlus Is Reportedly Shutting Down In the US, Europe

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
OnePlus will reportedly announce this week that it is shutting down its brand in the U.S. and Europe, following months of signs that parent company Oppo was winding down the brand’s global presence. India and China are reportedly unaffected, but it’s unclear whether Oppo will replace the brand directly in those markets. The move also raises questions about future support for existing OnePlus users. 9to5Google reports:
WinFuture reports that OnePlus is gearing up for an official withdrawal from the U.S. and European markets, with the announcement due in the “coming days” this week. Closed-door press conferences have apparently happened, with no details shared on the exact reason OnePlus as a brand is shutting down in these markets. India and China are, as far as this report claims, not affected. The report, citing “well-informed sources,” notes that this OnePlus announcement will come amid “fundamental changes” to Oppo’s strategy, but the big point here is the global death of OnePlus.

OnePlus is a Chinese smartphone manufacturer

By RobinH • Score: 5, Informative Thread
If, like me, you didn’t know who OnePlus was.

RAM costs

By alvinrod • Score: 3 Thread
I wonder if it’s the memory costs that did them in. They tended to make devices for the higher end of the market and putting 16 GB in a phone is going to be incredibly expensive for a company that can’t manufacture their own memory chips or drive enough volume to get discounts on purchases or preferred treatment from memory manufacturers.

I’m not an Android user, but the OnePlus 15 that they released last year was a good device that was well regarded. I know a lot of other posters here have had good things to say about them over the years as well. Hopefully they’re able to rebound from this and can continue offering great products.

Re:OnePlus is a Chinese smartphone manufacturer

By nashv • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

This isn’t a a judgement on you, but even in the US, Oneplus is a well known brand. The most prolific mobile phone reviewer MKBHD from the US, with 20 million + subscribers, has talked about it it for years.

You sir, are apparently living under a rock.

Re:OnePlus is a Chinese smartphone manufacturer

By MachineShedFred • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

They literally sold phones in the US for a decade or more, sometimes with better hardware than the “big boys” and not locking you out of bootloaders and 3rd party flashes but that’s ok.

I still have my OnePlus 9 Pro with the pop-up selfie cam and an actual full-screen front with no stupid notch or hole. Fantastic hardware. I look forward to it continuing to be useful under LineageOS for years to come.

So what are our options now?

By devslash0 • Score: 3 Thread

So what are sensible options left to us mortals now?

- iPhones are a very aquired taste.
- Samsungs are annoying bags of bloatware.
- Custom ROMs no longer pass SafetyNet reliably…

IBM Stock Collapses After a Grave Warning About AI

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
IBM shares plunged after the company warned that Q2 revenue and earnings would miss expectations, blaming customers’ sudden shift in spending toward AI hardware instead of software services. However, CEO Arvind Krishna did not place all the blame on IBM’s customers. The CEO also said it “faltered” by failing to “anticipate the magnitude of the capex reprioritization.”

“These conditions require our teams to execute perfectly, and this quarter we faltered. We did not adapt and move quickly enough, and numerous large deals failed to close on the timelines we expected, driving the majority of our shortfall.” Fast Company reports:
In the preliminary report, IBM said that for its second quarter of fiscal 2026, it expects revenue of $17.2 billion, which is up 1%. It also said it expects a Non-GAAP Diluted Earnings Per Share (EPS) of $2.93, up 5%. However, as noted by CNBC, these preliminary results are below what analysts were expecting, which was $17.86 billion in revenue, and an EPS of $3.01, according to FactSet data.

Re:good self awareness

By Gramie2 • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

I don’t know the details, but IBM has been switching its emphasis from hardware to services for quite a while. They sold off their Lenovo brand in 2014.

Lots more profit in services, as any customer who has had the misfortune to hire them has (to their sorrow) found. Like the Quebec Ministry of Transport, whose project to digitize car and driver licensing is years late and has topped $1.1 billion. Yes, billion. Thanks IBM (and SAP)!

IBM’s answer will be: chop chop chop

By hwstar • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Layoffs are coming.

Historically this is what IBM has done in the past to improve profitability.

I view this current debacle as a failure on management’s part to see what might be coming up in the sector as emerging tech just like layoffs are a failure of management to properly size the company and select the proper roles which drive growth and ultimately profitability.

Will management pay with their heads? That ultimately depends on the board, and maybe the shareholders.

Re:good self awareness

By jd • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Good question. Their POWER series of CPUs were not insignificant in capability, their chip designers were clearly technically sophisticated, and GPUs are just specialised vector processors with a few extra bells and whistles - stuff IBM is extremely familiar with.

It would not have been difficult to release a GPU or other LLM-specific processor to go along with the POWER11. They’d been working on the POWER11 for 4 years, they knew in 2020 that LLMs had a strong potential to be significant for Big Data processing - an area you use big iron for, they’re not rank amateurs, they have plenty of reserve, they could have assembled an emergency team to build a vector processor that was custom-designed for just LLM work, and released an LLM processor card that could run circles around nVidia.

They didn’t. Because, as has happened before, their management is simply too stupid and too slow.

It’s temporary.

By supabeast! • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

IBM is still in fine shape. The company is not losing money. Revenue did not fall off a cliff like the stock price did. If they’re smart IBM can wait this out and quietly prepare for things to bounce back when the insane AI capex ends and people need something IBM is ready to provide. (But, realistically, IBM will just lay off 25,000 good people instead of putting human capital to good use as part of a long term strategy.)

Indian Bumbling Manipulators (IBM)

By JakFrost • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Any IBM project I’ve seen in the last two decades has been filled with outsourced Indian consultants that put in the hours warning their chairs and accomplish nothing only to be replaced by another bumbling Indian to do the same when there is no progress and complaints come in from management and new time extension contract needs to be signed for when time and materials exceed the estimated costs until the project fails.

IBM SameTime, Lotus Notes Mail server upgrades, Z/OS migrations, x390 upgrades, P-Series hardware refresh, TADDM CMDB inventory, BigFix patch management failures, and the list goes on. All IBM products and projects that I’ve had to help fix, implement, maintain until replacements can be installed and IBM garbage ripped out.

Teaching IBM mainframe consultants how to FTP files to their mainframe filesystem partitions to upgrade the z/OS shows how low that company is sunk after it moved to India since it fired all of their local US talent and mainframe guys.

Any project that IBM touches goes IBM Blue(TM) from asphyxiation and withers away and dies.

Now they are losing to AI on their inept services and software projects after failing to anticipate that is just par per course for their consulting business. Just as bad as Deloitte.

Microsoft is following on their heels now also, full of outsources and offshored Indians and people wonder why Windows 11 sucks so hard?!

The US techies are left scrambling for the few leftover IT jobs here to be taken over by AI after they implement the death knell for their back-office working bretherent. They are building their own AI terminators, first for the non techies who are the clerks and analysts, but then for themselves to snipe each other out of the few remaining jobs in the future maintaining the AI IT infrastructure.

New York Becomes First State To Impose Data Center Moratorium

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
New York has become the first U.S. state to impose a moratorium on large new data centers, pausing construction for one year over concerns that AI-driven data center growth is raising utility bills, straining water supplies, and burdening communities. “As data center development threatens to hike up utility bills, deplete our natural resources, and create uncertainty for New Yorkers, it’s my responsibility to take action and lead,” said New York Governor Kathy Hochul. She will also pursue legislation to repeal sales tax exemptions for large data centers, Hochul added. Reuters reports:
The construction ban will apply to data centers that use 50 megawatts or more of power, officials in the governor’s office said. During the moratorium, the state’s Department of Environmental Conservation will not issue any discretionary permits not already deemed complete, the governor’s office said. Instead, Hochul directed state officials to develop a Generic Environmental Impact Statement to ensure that new data centers coming online are held to “consistent standards,” as well as examine the potential environmental impacts of the construction and operation of data centers in the state. The ban will be lifted once the state finalizes those standards, according to Hochul’s office.

Curious

By Anonymous Coward • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

How charging EVs will break the power grid but operating gigawatt slop datacenters is essential?

Praise be

By SumDog • Score: 3, Interesting Thread
Despite electing a communist mayor in their largest city, it seems like the state government is making a solid good move here. We already have way more capacity than China. I high doubt any of the current model hosting providers are anywhere near capacity or have growth curves even approaching them. It’s all investment fraud and NY is doing the right thing to put a hard break on the newest Tulip Mania

StubHub, CEO Hit With ‘Deceptive Practices’ Class Action Over Mass Scalping

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from the BBC:
StubHub and its CEO, Eric Baker, have been hit with a proposed $5-million class-action lawsuit in the United States over the company’s ties to large-scale scalpers — connections reported by CBC News last week. The suit, filed Monday by New York ticket buyer Louis Sanquini, alleges deceptive practices and fraudulent misrepresentation over StubHub’s promoting itself as a “marketplace for fans to buy and sell tickets.” The online ticket resale giant has faced a storm of customer complaints after cancelling thousands of World Cup tickets. The company has repeatedly said it is simply a technology platform that does not buy, sell or possess tickets. However, CBC reported last week that Baker disclosed in recent filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission that he runs Andro Capital, a hedge fund that engages in large-scale resale of millions of dollars’ worth of sports and concert tickets on the StubHub resale platform.

Sanquini filed the proposed class action in the Southern District of New York, arguing consumers were kept in the dark and that he believed StubHub was a “neutral” marketplace. Lead counsel Kevin Steinberg told CBC News in an emailed statement that “consumers deserve honesty and transparency.” A CBC investigation found that the CEO of online ticket reseller StubHub owns and manages a hedge fund that scalps millions of dollars of its own tickets. “While what StubHub is alleged to have engaged in and perpetrated upon millions of patrons is unfathomable, this case is about transparency and consumer trust. If companies make representations to the public, consumers are entitled to expect that those representations are complete and accurate,” he said.

The claim reads: “Defendants’ failure to disclose this conflict of interest, while affirmatively marketing StubHub as a fan-to-fan marketplace, deceived Plaintiff and the Class and caused them to pay prices, and accept terms, they would not have accepted had the truth been known.” Sanquini argues that had he known StubHub’s CEO held a financial interest and that the company was helping finance professional resellers, he would never have used the resale site to buy tickets to see rock band Kiss in 2023 or to attend a New York Red Bulls-New York City FC Major League Soccer match in 2024.

$5 million is laughably low

By blastard • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

This should not be filled asking for a mere $5 million. It looks a little like a fake suit to get him and them off the hook. Even if they settled for the full amount they are getting off easy.

Crank it up

By Bahbus • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

StubHub valuation: ~$4 billion
Eric Baker net worth: ~$800 million

This class action should be seeking a minimum of 20% of the company’s value as well as 50% of Eric Baker’s net worth.

Indian Scientists Produce Most Detailed 3D Atlas of the Human Brainstem

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Scientists at the Indian Institute of Technology, Madras (IIT-M) have created what they describe as the world’s most detailed 3D cellular atlas of the human brainstem, linking whole-brain MRI views to individual neurons across more than 500 tissue sections. The free online atlas, called Anchor, could help researchers better understand diseases such as Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, stroke, and SIDS by showing how healthy and diseased brain tissue differs cell by cell. The BBC reports:
Built from high-resolution microscope images rather than costlier molecular techniques, it creates a detailed three-dimensional map of the brainstem, identifying more than 200 clusters of brain cells and nerve pathways. Eight chemical markers help distinguish different cell types, producing one of the clearest pictures yet of this vital, but poorly, understood part of the brain. The brainstem occupies only a sliver of the brain, yet it keeps people alive. It links the brain to the spinal cord and controls breathing, heartbeat, sleep, wakefulness and movement.

[…] Users can zoom from the whole brainstem seen on MRI down to individual neurons while maintaining their precise spatial relationships. The researchers have made the atlas freely available online, hoping it becomes a reference tool for neuroscientists, neurologists and neurosurgeons worldwide. Its applications could also extend well beyond anatomy. By comparing healthy brainstem maps with diseased tissue, scientists may better understand disorders ranging from Parkinson’s disease and stroke to Alzheimer’s disease and sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). More precise maps could also help neurosurgeons navigate one of the brain’s most delicate regions with greater confidence.

“The” or “A”?

By fuzzyfuzzyfungus • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
I don’t want to diminish the accomplishment; that seems like a very cool dataset and probably one that was really fiddly to pull together; but, if you are talking single-neuron resolution; I am curious about whether you can still call an individual sample “the human brainstem” rather than “a human brainstem” and what comparative purposes you can use it for without running into trouble with cases where there are multiple ways for a brainstem to be adequately healthy, so long as certain requirements are met, so you’ll need considerably more samples to draw useful inferences about exactly what the problem abnormality is.

Same sort of thing as when “sequencing the human genome” was a big project. Obviously a major exercise in gene sequencing and a basis for situating subsequent sequencing operations; but once you start talking detail there isn’t ‘the human genome’; literally everyone has one; and it turns out that different differences matter or don’t at radically different levels.

Presumably the methods used to do it once will be helpful in doing it more often in the future; but I’ll be curious what we discover about the balance of ‘normalcy’ vs. some relatively subtle and confusing combination of surprisingly variable ways to have a brainstem that seems to work just fine along with surprisingly subtle, no ghastly big lesions, ways to have one that ends up being totally dodgy.

Put it in a book, you cowards

By 602 • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
There is a marvelous book that I look at in the library every year or so: “The brain stem of the cat; a cytoarchitectonic atlas with stereotaxic coordinates”, Berman, Alvin L.; Madison, University of Wisconsin Press; 1968, 175 pages 80 illustrations *59 cm*. Yeah, the book is 2 feet tall, much larger than any of my computer screens.

Scientists Find Sugar Deep In Our Galaxy

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Astronomers have detected erythrulose, a sugar found in raspberries and self-tanners, in a gas cloud near the center of the Milky Way. While not essential for life itself, the molecule can convert into a form thought to be important for life’s origins, adding evidence that key prebiotic ingredients may be widespread across the galaxy. The Associated Press reports:
Using two dish-shaped radio telescopes in Spain, researchers collected data from a large gas cloud near the center of the Milky Way. They identified the sugar in gas form by comparing telescope signals to samples in the lab. It’s the latest kind of sugar detected in space — in a region crossed by NASA’s twin Voyager, the farthest spacecraft to ever travel from Earth.

Scientists have found interesting chemistry in our galaxy, including building blocks for genetic material and parts of the cell. They spotted a cousin to table sugar near the center of the Milky Way about 25 years ago, and black grains from asteroid Bennu retrieved by NASA’s Osiris-Rex spacecraft yielded other sugars, including a key DNA ingredient. The latest sugar isn’t essential for life, but can easily convert to a form that’s thought to be crucial to kick-starting life on Earth. And it’s one of the most complex sugars spotted so far, said astrophysicist Erika Hamden with the University of Arizona.
The results were published in the journal Nature Astronomy.

That’s it, I’m leaving

By jfdavis668 • Score: 5, Funny Thread
Going to move to a sugar-free galaxy.

Sugar In The Milkyway

By SlashbotAgent • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Milkways are indeed super sweet. They have a lot of sugar in them.

It might cause diabetes but they are soooooo good.

In addition

By kencurry • Score: 4, Funny Thread
Astronomers noticed that the sugar was concentrated on massive flake-shaped exoplanets that reside in what’s known as the “bowl region” in the Milky Way.

Over 200 Economists Say ‘We Must Act Now’ On AI’s Economic Impact

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot
An anonymous reader quotes a report from the Associated Press:
Hundreds of economists say in an open letter that institutions "must act now” to address how artificial intelligence could transform the economy and could put many people out of work. The statement released Monday was signed by top economists, along with computer scientists and some executives at tech companies including Anthropic, Google and OpenAI.

“AI may become radically more powerful over the next 10 years,” says the letter organized by Stanford University’s digital economy lab. “This could drive an unprecedented transformation of our economy, larger than the Industrial Revolution, but unfolding over a vastly shorter time frame. It could bring risks, including large-scale job displacement, as well as opportunities such as major gains in living standards.”

The letter, which has only four sentences, says leaders must “build the incentives, guardrails, and institutions needed to steer AI in a direction that complements humans and benefits society.” The Stanford lab says the letter has so far been signed by more than 200 economists and AI researchers, including 16 winners of a Nobel Prize.
“We must be intentional and make collective, democratic choices, rather than letting market forces play out and risking leaving most citizens behind,” wrote computer scientist and AI pioneer Yoshua Bengio, who was also among the signatories. He said it “it is highly plausible that AI will drastically transform our economies.”

Other signatories include Google CEO Eric Schmidt, LinkedIn cofounder Reid Hoffman, and Nobel laureates Joseph Stiglitz, Daron Acemonglu, and Simon Johnson.

200 Economists

By rossdee • Score: 5, Informative Thread

If all the economists in the world were laid end to end, they wouldn’t reach a conclusion.

Markets work governments screw things up

By n2hightech • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
The market does its best job meeting the needs of the people with the fewest rules. Government rules screw up the market and make it less efficient. Anti gouging laws (price controls) lead to shortages. Rent control Housing shortages. Licensing lack of competition. What government needs to do is help provide reliable information, promote truthfulness in advertising. Aid those harmed by bad actions to recover damages. Make it easy for competitors to enter the market. Instead most of the rules and efforts of government seem to favor established companies and prevent new participants.

Re:LLM output is Grey Goo and Ecophagy.

By Rei • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

They weren’t discovered by an LLM. They were known conjectures that were proven by an automated solving language that was linked to an LLM.

I’ll take “Things That Didn’t Happen For $200”, Alex.

Only a handful of meaningful proofs have ever been done by automated formal theorem solvers (the Four Colour Theorem being the most noteworthy example - but its proof is so long that humans can’t verify it). By contrast, AI tools have been solving Erdos problems en masse. The majority of them just bog-standard commercial models. In case you need help, the only ones on that list that were hybrid (AI / non-AI) in the actual solving phase are:

1) AlphaProof / DeepMind Prover Agent / AlphaProof Nexus
2) Aristotle (Harmonic)
3) Seed Prover / Seed Prover 1.5 (ByteDance)
4) AxiomProver (Axiom Math)

In each of the above, LLMs come up with the lemmas / strategies but then use Monte Carlo search (“brute force”) or likewise to investigate what they came up with. These are a minority. In the “AI Standalone” category, these “hybrid” tools made up only ~20% of attempts and successful proofs. Hybrid tools actually made more of a contribution in the “AI Alongside Literature” (related literature found afterward) and even more of the “AI Building On Literature” (related literature known beforehand) categories, which is the opposite of what people like you expect.

And even with the hybrid tools, it’s still the AI doing the heavy lifting when it comes to strategy. Non-AI theorem solvers, again, don’t have a spectacular record for churning out novel proofs to unsolved problems. Tools like Lean are more about mathematical rigour - a passive environment that requires a driver (a human or AI) to feed it actual strategies, lemmas, and proof steps. And no, you cannot brute force “strategy” in the vast majority of cases, which is, again, why automated theorem solvers don’t have much of a track record with unsolved mathematical problems.

Let’s take a random example: the disproof of the unit distance conjecture. It was solved purely by a general purpose commercial GPT model, not custom-trained to mathematics, with no external tools. Read what the various mathematicians reviewing / commenting on it have to say (sections #3 and onward). Seriously, don’t skip reading them, actually read them. This was one of Erdos’s favourite problems. He mentioned it commonly in his lectures. Essentially every mathematician working in complex geometry has thought about this problem. The approach that the model came up with was highly novel approach, based on CM-fields and class field towers.

I know you don’t want to accept this reality, but it is the reality, so you better improve your ability to accept it,. The field of mathematics is already doing so.

Re:Lots of magical thinking here

By allo • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

“There is not even reason to expect LLMs to be still a thing in 10 years.”

Bullshit. Even if development would stop right now, people would use the existing tools the next 10 years and beyond. Even if their usage won’t get better (hardware not getting cheaper and more efficient anymore) many of them run on affordable hardware that is worth the benefit brought by the tool.

I won’t want to bet on the increase continuing like it currently goes for ten years, but people will surely use LLMs and image AI in ten years.
I also think that if current development stops, you can still increase the usefulness of current models by building good harnesses. Current ones are experimental, more complicated than needed and chaotic what to use when.

If you look at professional software, Photoshop doesn’t have great tools because the algorithms are that great, but because they added duct tape at all rough edges of the algorithms. Currently LLM and image AI is getting better too fast that we would even start at duct taping their flaws, because the next model fixes them anyway. But if the growth slows down, we will see tools that improve the use a lot without improving the underlying model.

I also neither believe in AGI, nor in us needing AGI for more than showing it is possible.

Re:Not with this administration

By OrangeTide • Score: 3 Thread

What’s the point of blaming the previous administration when they can no longer do anything about it? I could blame Nixon for not doing something about climate change, for all the good it would do.

As for AGI and worse, ASI, the risk to human civilization is very real. The rest of us are in peril right now without regulation and an international framework to inspect and confiscate materials for dangerous AI projects. A failure of leadership to lead. A failure of governments to protect its citizenry. Treating AI as just another business is a massive blunder.