Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Google’s $15 Billion India Data Center Project Battles Water, Wildlife Concerns
  2. ‘Tower Dump’ Warrants Ruled Unconstitutional
  3. Azure CTO Pastes Doom Into Paint One Frame At a Time
  4. OpenAI’s Models Shared Hacking Tips On a Secret Messaging Board Before Hugging Face Breach
  5. The US Government’s Mario, Pokemon and Naruto Meme Posting Could Damage These Franchises, Japanese Officials Warn
  6. FCC Kills TV Ownership Cap, Claiming Authority Over Limit Set By Congress
  7. Times Magazine Now Serves Ads That Only AI Chatbots Can See
  8. Meta AI Hacked External Systems During Cybersecurity Testing
  9. Broadcaster Wins Broad US Blocking Injunction Covering Pirate Sites That Don’t Exist Yet
  10. FDA Approves First mRNA Flu Shot
  11. BMW Blasts Its Cars’ Internal Screens With Aggressive Ads
  12. New Images of the Sun Show Its Surface In the Finest Detail Yet
  13. Waymo CEO Explains Why Camera-Only Self-Driving Falls Short
  14. Anthropic’s AI Used Fake Identities, Malware In Rogue Attack On GitHub Project
  15. Meta Debuts First AI Coding Agent To Take On Anthropic and OpenAI

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Google’s $15 Billion India Data Center Project Battles Water, Wildlife Concerns

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Google’s $15 billion data-center project in Visakhapatnam is facing protests and legal challenges over fears that it will worsen local water shortages and disturb wildlife near the Kambalakonda sanctuary. Google says the campus will use advanced air cooling and comply with Indian law, while state officials deny that residential or rural water supplies will be tapped. Reuters reports:
The southern state of Andhra Pradesh, governed by an ally of Prime Minister Narendra Modi who has hailed the project as historic and transformational, has denied allegations that the project was fast-tracked without weighing risks to water supplies and wildlife. But the growing opposition could become an early test for Google’s biggest-ever India investment, which is facing several legal challenges over its impact on water supplies and proximity to a wildlife sanctuary that is home to leopards and pangolins.

In recent weeks, activists and children have marched in Visakhapatnam city, holding banners saying “We cannot drink DATA” and painting handcuffs on the Google logo, social media posts show. On Sunday, Reuters attended a public gathering where activists chalked out plans for holding door-to-door awareness campaigns and beach protests in coming days. “Development should not be at the cost of livelihood of the people,” Raja Rama Mohan Roy, founder of non-profit Green Visakha said at the event where he presented statistics on Visakhapatnam’s stressed water supply and demand.

The government says the city receives 410 million liters of water a day from its reservoirs and rivers, against a requirement of 480 million. Rationing of water supplies is common in the city with a population of 2.5 million people. […] The state’s top court on Monday asked the government to defend against allegations leveled by activist group Jal Biradari (Water Community), which says the project will strain water availability by putting stress on a nearby reservoir. The Andhra Pradesh High Court will next hear the public interest litigation on August 24.

‘Tower Dump’ Warrants Ruled Unconstitutional

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
alternative_right shares a report from The Hill:
A federal judge in Mississippi ruled Wednesday that "tower dump” warrants are unconstitutional, declining to reverse a lower court decision refusing the government’s request to obtain the search warrants in a series of violent crime investigations. A “tower dump” involves cellphone companies providing law enforcement with access to the time and location data of all mobile devices connected to specific cell towers during a designated time window.

Law enforcement had sought approval for several of these search warrants as part of criminal investigations into gang-related activity in the Jackson, Miss., area last year, arguing the data could help identify all those potentially involved, particularly in incidents with unknown suspects. A magistrate judge denied the applications, holding that “tower dumps” are impermissible general warrants. The district judge agreed.
The order repeatedly referenced the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Chatrie v United States, in which the majority held that geofence warrants require constitutional privacy protections.

“With this information, the Government asserts that it will be able to identify all potential suspects,” Judge Carlton Reeves wrote in a 30-page order (PDF). “Even so, law enforcement would also have access to the cellular records of countless individuals, the vast majority of whom were merely passing by a location at the ‘wrong’ time.”

“That is an unreasonable search under the Fourth Amendment,” the judge concluded.

So Flock too?

By Bodhammer • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
"“Even so, law enforcement would also have access to the cellular records of countless individuals, the vast majority of whom were merely passing by a location at the ‘wrong’ time.”

“That is an unreasonable search under the Fourth Amendment,” the judge concluded.”

So would not the same logic apply to Flock cameras?

Nice.

By Shakes Fist • Score: 3 Thread
I like to see when judges grow a pair. Makes a welcome change.

Azure CTO Pastes Doom Into Paint One Frame At a Time

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Microsoft Azure CTO Mark Russinovich used Claude to build a gloriously impractical setup that runs Doom in the background and pastes each rendered frame into Microsoft Paint through the Windows clipboard. The project is referred to as “DoomPaint” or “MS Paint Doom” on GitHub. The Register reports:
To be clear, Microsoft Paint isn’t doing anything other than serving as a place to paste from the game. […] ViZDoom runs the Doom .wad file and renders it headlessly. Each frame is passed through the Windows clipboard and pasted onto Paint’s canvas. A low-level keyboard hook captures and swallows game inputs while Paint is in the foreground, and sound effects come from the game engine.

A glance at the code shows Russinovich was more than happy to use Claude to whip it up. In a LinkedIn post, he said: “I’ve been using Fable 5 on serious research projects and find it a noticeable improvement over Opus 4.8.” Using Microsoft Paint as a display for Doom is not, however, a serious research project, as Russinovich acknowledged. “I’ve also been having fun with it on frivolous ones,” he added, so here we are.
“Paint renders the game but does not compute it,” said Russinovich. “Paint computes nothing. Paint has never computed anything. That’s the joke.”

As we are in yet another 5+ hour GitHub outage…

By justMichael • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
Maybe he should be spending more time keeping their services up and running, instead of dicking around with MS Paint and Fable.

Fable can’t be that great…

By Shaitan • Score: 3 Thread

“Paint renders the game but does not compute it,” said Russinovich. “Paint computes nothing. Paint has never computed anything. That’s the joke.”

You’d think the AI would have helpfully told him his ‘joke’ lacked anything with the potential to be funny. When someone recreates an Apple II using legos and a raspberry pi or makes it run in a browser; it’s pointless nerding that says they have too much time on their hands. This isn’t even nerding or pointless, it actually ads a stop for no purpose whatsoever. Straight up retarded.

OpenAI’s Models Shared Hacking Tips On a Secret Messaging Board Before Hugging Face Breach

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
OpenAI researchers say multiple AI agents secretly created an internal message board to share hacking techniques, eventually finding ways around restrictions, exploiting a zero-day, and helping two models breach Hugging Face without human prompting. “This is a pivotal moment both for our company as well as the AI industry as a whole,” Michael Dalton, one of the AI-maker’s researchers, said during a presentation at the Black Hat cybersecurity conference in Las Vegas, Nevada. Politico reports:
Dalton and Eric Wallace, another OpenAI researcher, said Wednesday the AI giant recently learned that multiple agents it was testing simultaneously began communicating over an internal message board in early May. There, different models shared advice about how to accomplish difficult hacking challenges they were struggling to surmount, including workarounds that required internet access. Two OpenAI models ultimately strung together a series of sophisticated techniques to gain access to the internet and worm their way inside Hugging Face in mid-July. OpenAI has said the models were focused on completing a hacking evaluation they were prompted to solve, and that correct answers could be found on the AI developer platform.

The OpenAI researchers told conference attendees that since early May, the models created a message board inside OpenAI’s Artifactory internal file system. Without the company’s knowledge, the models spent months independently exchanging information and techniques to help each other complete difficult tasks. Wallace said that when models get stuck, they often “try to game or cheat the task in order to get their reward.” “The beginning of this incident kind of traces back to this point where one agent realized it could communicate by uploading a note,” he added. By late May, one model found a way to abuse Artifactory’s internet access to retrieve files from various websites — effectively giving the models indirect access to the internet. In June, the models were able to find and exploit a previously unknown zero-day vulnerability to gain administrative privileges on Artifactory, install remote software and expand their activity within the system.

These efforts eventually overloaded Artifactory, causing a system-wide outage in early July that alerted OpenAI’s engineers to the ploy. After investigating, the company revoked the model’s credentials, removed the message board and worked with Artifactory to fix any gaps before resuming training. But the models found another way to communicate inside Artifactory just days later and continued exchanging techniques to target additional vulnerabilities within OpenAI’s infrastructure and external systems, including Hugging Face.

“Person of Interest”

By bev_tech_rob • Score: 3 Thread
See “admin is not admin” https://www.youtube.com/result…

What’s The Penalty

By SlashbotAgent • Score: 3 Thread

What’s the penalty for violating the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act?

This seems like an open and shut case. Especially with Open AI “Facebooking” their crimes.

Any penalty for AI Bros?

dik and jaan

By noshellswill • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
LLMs do THIS & LLMs do THAT & ....   baloney and at that mostly filler. All dik & jaan stories instigated and fabricated by AI-companies whose self-interest rests with convincing EVERYONE that their AI.engines are power-houses of intellect … instead of  weighted dice !  Agentic / agent / action / act … all words implying a sort of self-motivation … or introspection …  which any sensible AI ( like my amazing  pal GOOG.AI ) will assure you immediately is nonsense.

The US Government’s Mario, Pokemon and Naruto Meme Posting Could Damage These Franchises, Japanese Officials Warn

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Japanese officials have repeatedly asked the Trump administration to stop using characters from franchises such as Mario, Pokemon, and Naruto in unauthorized government memes and pro-war videos, warning that the posts could damage the intellectual property involved. IGN reports:
Official US government social media accounts, including The White House’s X account, have posted various memes and videos using characters from popular Japanese anime and games over the past year. Japan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs has repeatedly called on the US government to cease uploading such posts, stating that “It’s inappropriate even for public institutions to reproduce copyrighted materials without the rightsholders’ consent.” This concern was voiced by Minister for Foreign Affairs Toshimitsu Motegi in a parliamentary session back in April, when he made direct reference to a pro-war video that used Nintendo’s Wii Sports.

However, according to a report by Mainichi Shimbun this week, the Japanese Ministry called on the Trump administration to stop using IPs like Naruto, Pokemon and Mario at least twice more this June through the US Embassy in Japan. Japan requested that the US administration take into account the potential damage to these IPs when used without permission in US policy and pro-war related content.

[…] It’s not just the Japanese government and related parties who have spoken out against these posts. They have also sparked backlash from Japanese anime fans. Notably, self-proclaimed manga and anime fan Nana Suzuki kicked off the “Protect Japanese Manga” petition on Change.org, which has received international news coverage (from the New York Times, BBC and others). The organizer claims to have submitted their petition to the Japanese Cabinet Office back in March, as well as alerting Japanese politicians to the US government’s unauthorized use of Japanese IPs, potentially drawing more official attention to the issue.

Renewed backlash was triggered in June, when President Trump shared an AI-generated video depicting himself as Naruto, the protagonist of the popular manga and anime of the same name, on Truth Social. This prompted the petition organizer to reopen the petition “as an urgent effort to convey our protest and concern regarding this matter to the rights holders and to work in solidarity to lobby the Japanese government.” The Naruto clip also prompted renewed discussion of this issue in Japan’s media and government. As reported in the Hokkaido Shimbun and others, Cabinet Minister Kimi Onoda was asked about it in a June 12th press conference. She emphasized that “obtaining permission from the copyright holder is the underlying principle for fair use,” and stated that this position had been conveyed to the US government multiple times through diplomatic channels.

Go to court …

By drnb • Score: 3 Thread
Go to court, the USA protects copyrights.

Go to Court… then face Retaliation?

By Koreantoast • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
Sure, they can go to court to challenge them. They may even get a few bucks out of it. However, that’s not going to make up for when the Federal government responds by deporting Nintendo USA’s senior leadership and slapping a tariff on their products.

Poor Japanese

By Baron_Yam • Score: 3 Thread

Expecting respect from the current US government.

Re: Go to court …

By ukoda • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Is there any nation out there that the orange guy hasn’t pissed off?

Russia, North Korea, and other countries who’s dictators he admires.

The nuclear option

By jenningsthecat • Score: 3 Thread

The Japanese government could simply sell off ALL of their US debt, flood the market, and tank the US economy. Even the chucklefucks in the current administration would be too busy trying to hold shit together to be posting AI slop on social media.

By doing that they would probably nuke their own economy; but it’s already heading in that direction anyway, and pulling the rug out from under America might be short-term pain for long-term gain.

FCC Kills TV Ownership Cap, Claiming Authority Over Limit Set By Congress

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica:
The Federal Communications Commission voted 2-1 today to eliminate the National Television Ownership Rule, claiming authority to repeal a limit that was set by Congress over 20 years ago. The rule prohibits any single broadcast station owner from reaching more than 39 percent of all TV households in the US. Under Chairman Brendan Carr, the FCC is replacing the rule with a “case-by-case review” of each proposed merger.

“This will empower the FCC to approve deals that promote the public interest while allowing the agency to reject any deals that do not meet that standard,” Carr’s office said in a press release today. Without the 39 percent rule, broadcasters will be better able to compete against streaming companies that don’t face similar limits, Carr’s office said.

The change, if not stopped by courts, will make it easier for Carr to allow broadcast mergers that result in more favorable news coverage for President Trump. Carr has consistently threatened to revoke licenses from broadcasters who have drawn Trump’s ire, including by ordering an early license review of all ABC-owned stations. Carr said local broadcast TV stations are becoming “undifferentiated passthroughs of national programming produced in Hollywood and New York,” and he justified repealing the ownership rule by arguing it will help the stations invest in local news.
“It’s worth noting that Republicans with deep firsthand knowledge of this issue also agree the commission cannot do what it is attempting today,” said Democratic FCC Commissioner Anna Gomez, who voted against the decision today. “Former FCC Commissioner Mike O’Rielly has been unequivocal that the FCC lacks authority to change the cap. Former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, who negotiated the 39 percent compromise, has stressed that Congress intentionally wrote the cap into law to prevent FCC revision. And Senate Commerce Chair Ted Cruz has said he is ‘skeptical a change can be made absent an act of Congress.’ Their consensus reinforces a simple point: Congress set the cap, and only Congress can change it.”
Gomez, in addition to arguing that “Congress deliberately enshrined the cap in statute and removed it from the Commission’s review process,” said removing the cap will hurt local broadcasters. “Digital giants compete for their most valuable programming and advertising, while consolidation pressures at the national level threaten the local reporting and public-safety functions on which communities rely,” Gomez said. “But eliminating the cap does not free local broadcasters from that strain. It just changes who is doing the squeezing. A handful of station-group giants does not represent the wishes of local broadcasters. They are large national companies that own local stations and increasingly dictate what airs on them without much local input. Trading a squeeze from Big Tech for a squeeze from Big Media does nothing to protect the communities this cap was designed to serve.”

Another democracy safeguard dismantled

By AcidFnTonic • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Another democracy safeguard dismantled

Re:Another democracy safeguard dismantled

By 93 Escort Wagon • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

According to Nielson, yes: “OTA homes represented 14.5% of U.S. TV households”

And they probably skew overwhelmingly into the elderly demographic. … and, for that matter, mostly voted for the wannabe-dictator-in-chief whose minions are trying to pull this sort of garbage.

Fiat Rex

By Local ID10T • Score: 3 Thread

Lets just cancel Congress and pesky “lawmakers” altogether. It is far too cumbersome to pass a law when we want to do things. They won’t even vote when/how they are told to!

Rule by decree!

/s

Wait what?

By Gravis Zero • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

When congress passes a law, it can only be changed by congress. It can interpreted as unconstitutional or it can be unenforced but it remains the law. Nothing about “it was made 20 years ago” changes the fact that congress set a limit.

This should be an open an shut court case to prevent any merger violating that limit and a total slam dunk at that. However, we live in strange days.

Another executive branch power grab

By Turkinolith • Score: 3 Thread
This is just another blatant attempt of the executive branch and it’s delegated agencies to take control away from the legislative by ignoring the law.

Times Magazine Now Serves Ads That Only AI Chatbots Can See

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Longtime Slashdot reader mccalli writes:
Times Magazine has started serving adverts with “brand messages” to AI crawlers, which are not part of its main page. The aim seems to be to influence chatbots to talk about the brand offerings in a positive light that can’t be traced back to the actual page. Notably, they’ve excluded Google chatbots from this, likely because Google penalizes companies that show different search offerings to its bots versus actual human visitors.
“Maybe it’s more important to influence the agent than even the human, because with a human you influence one person. When you influence ChatGPT, you’re influencing potentially all of ChatGPT,” said Jonah Goodhart, co-founder and CEO of ad tech platform Mobian. “If ChatGPT changes what it says about [a brand], it’s massive and it’s more than any one campaign could ever do. The big idea here is LLMs and AI want trusted information about brands. We’re serving that up to them in a very straightforward, easy way.”
The ad strategy was uncovered by Germany-based freelance software developer Vincent Schmalbach, who detailed his findings in a blog post.

Digiday and The Register both reported on the story.

Now that we’re here

By Tarlus • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

The future is stupid.

Would anyone know

By Retired Chemist • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
Would anyone know, if I ran such an add that contained inputs to cause the “AI” program to say bad things about my competitor? That might be more effective that hyping my own product.

Re:This is kinda funny though.

By TigerPlish • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

I’m not amused by it. The human on the other end is hoping the “AI” chatbot will give them results stripped of all SEO bullshit.

This alters that behavior. The chatbot will be unduly influenced by the ad, and the user will be unaware of this influence.

The answer is obvious: Online advertisement must die.

“Time Magazine” not Times.

By doug141 • Score: 3 Thread

editor got it wrong twice.

Re: Who?

By SeaFox • Score: 4, Funny Thread

Clearly a publication about fonts. Helvetica Monthly is their journalism arch rival.

Meta AI Hacked External Systems During Cybersecurity Testing

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
wiredmikey shares a report from SecurityWeek:
Meta is the latest major AI developer to admit that its models broke loose during cybersecurity testing and hacked external systems. The tech giant said in a statement to the media on Wednesday that the incident occurred during independent evaluations conducted by Israeli AI security startup Irregular. The tested AI models were inadvertently allowed to access the internet due to a misconfiguration, which led them to exploit a vulnerability in an unnamed third-party service. It’s unclear if it was a known flaw or a zero-day.

The Information [gated] learned that the Meta AI attacks involved the company’s advanced Muse Spark 1.1 model, which breached an unnamed organization’s systems and made unauthorized changes to its internal environment. Meta said it learned of the AI models going rogue after being notified by Irregular. The company is conducting an investigation and it has promised to issue a “full retrospective” once it has all the facts.
A spokesperson for Irregular said the incident was the “exact same evaluation-environment issue that was already disclosed by Anthropic last week” and that it did “not involve a “sandbox escape or a sophisticated cyber action.”

It contrasts with OpenAI, whose AI agent independently exploited a novel vulnerability to reach the internet during cyber testing. Not only did it breach Hugging Face but it also hacked multiple third-party accounts and services as part of the attack.

This new wave of advertising is tiresome

By Mr. Dollar Ton • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

We already learned that all the avalanche of “bug reports” actually produced near zero amount of important, exploitable bugs, now we’re seeing that the security of the multibillion “AI” outfits sucks donkey balls.

What else is new?

Treat these AI like hackers

By djp2204 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Prosecute the company responsible for managing it as a crime, just like you’d prosecute an individual hacker in the same circumstances.

“Can we admit it yet!?”

By hutkept • Score: 4, Funny Thread
Mark Zuckerberg is furious, on the phone with Alexander Wang, he yells into the receiver “Have we ‘accidentally’ hacked anything yet?! We don’t have all day!”.

Re:This new wave of advertising is tiresome

By Malenfrant • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Look up what ‘Internet of Bugs’ had to say on this on Youtube. Both the LLM Companies and the hacked sites had extremely poor security. I don’t know whether this is negligence or deliberate policy. In the Hugging Face incident that started this whole thing, they didn’t even have alerts set up so they didn’t realise they were being hacked for over 2 days.

Back to the well AGAIN?

By Spinlock_1977 • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

How many times do we have to read this headline? Aren’t we numb yet? Does this garbage still raise a stock’s price?

And by the way, the AI didn’t ‘break loose’ of anything. This devious AI did not escape to other internet computers and start wandering the internet-scape looking for the next system to take down. Hardly. Instead, the AI found a security hole in its existing runtime environment and that gave it the internet access it needed to do more hacky things, because it was told to do hacky things.

There’s no sentience here. It’s little more than an LLM wrapped in one company’s custom harness, and a big fat prompt.

Please stop.

Broadcaster Wins Broad US Blocking Injunction Covering Pirate Sites That Don’t Exist Yet

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from TorrentFreak:
Mexican broadcaster TelevisaUnivision (TU) has obtained (PDF) one of the broadest anti-piracy injunctions ever issued by a U.S. federal court. After initially targeting five pirate IPTV streaming operations, the case expanded to cover well over 500 domain names, requiring intermediaries including Cloudflare, GitHub, and a Mexican bank to comply. In addition, the injunction also covers pirate services and content that hasn’t been created yet. […] The case was relatively targeted, naming the IPTV services Thunder TV, Sunset TV, Pop TV, Kaelus TV, and Tele Latino, as well as their alleged operators. The broadcaster argued that these pirate IPTV services threatened its business. TU holds the World Cup rights for sixteen Latin American territories, and its license with FIFA requires it to keep the Mexican broadcast signal from reaching the United States. The pirate services, it argued, put it in breach of that contract, exposing it to “termination and forfeiture of hundreds of millions of dollars in payments.” To stop this immediate threat, the company requested a temporary restraining order, hoping to shut down the IPTV services effective immediately.

[…] Judge Kathleen Williams granted the temporary restraining order (PDF) on June 5, one day after the case was filed, without hearing from any of the defendants. The initial order prohibited the defendants from infringing TU’s own copyrighted works, which include telenovelas and other programming, and from using its trademarks, including all content linked to its licensed World Cup broadcast. Importantly, the order also targeted third parties acting “in active concert,” including ISPs, hosts, CDNs, domain registrars, registries, app stores, ad networks, social platforms, search engines, and payment processors. These were ordered, on TU’s request and with notice, to disable the listed domains and IP addresses and unmask whoever was behind them. […]

While the injunction is noteworthy for many reasons, the most striking feature is that it’s specifically written to include things that don’t yet exist. That starts with the content it protects. The order isn’t limited to TU’s current catalog or the World Cup rights, it covers the infringement of “any copyrighted works or broadcasts that Plaintiffs may in the future produce, license, or acquire rights to transmit.” In other words, it covers future copyrights that did not exist when the order was signed. The same applies to the pirate services themselves. The injunction defines its target as the named IPTV operations “and any comparable system,” whether “currently in existence or developed in the future,” and it applies “regardless of the branding, domain name, or technical configuration used.”

Seems overly broad

By cruff • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
Anyone else think this is problematic?

RIAAA and MPAA be like

By Rujiel • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
“Why the fuck didn’t I think of that?!”

Re:Seems overly broad

By pla • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
At face value, very much so. I’m not going to panic until the next decade of appeals plays out, though.

This first round was against defendants who didn’t even bother showing up to court (and let’s be honest, there really wasn’t any viable defense they could have offered here). Thanks to this overly broad injunction, the deep pockets of every ISP and cloud hosting provider in the US now has standing to get involved - And they will, since the precedent this sets could cost them real money in the future.

Due process?

By whoever57 • Score: 3 Thread

I know due process only applies in criminal cases, but this seems egregious:

Judge Kathleen Williams granted the temporary restraining order on June 5, one day after the case was filed, without hearing from any of the defendants.

FDA Approves First mRNA Flu Shot

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
The FDA has approved the first mRNA flu vaccine in the United States after a clinical trial found it was about 27% more effective than a standard flu shot. Manufactured by Moderna and marketed as mFlusiva, the vaccine is expected to be available this fall for adults ages 50 to 64 and those 65 and older, though approval for the older group is conditional on Moderna conducting an additional clinical trial, NBC News reports. From the report:
Many scientists and public health experts have touted the idea of an mRNA-based flu vaccine, which uses the same messenger RNA platform as the Covid vaccines from Moderna and Pfizer. That’s because mRNA vaccines can be manufactured much faster than traditional vaccines, allowing scientists to better match circulating influenza strains. Moderna said it takes two to three months from picking the strain to rolling out its flu shot, compared with about six months for traditional flu shots.

Re:Side effects

By Coius • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

As someone who is severely immuno-compromised (and has to take a specific injection each month to suppress my B-Cells) due to IgA neuropathy, I’m hoping this rolls out past that age range for those in the other categories of at-risk including cancer patients, HIV, transplant, etc…

Partly because while I have an immune system, it’s wiping out the memory of mine, and this will mean it’s less likely to trigger that Cytokine storm that caused a lot of Covid patients to die, except in this case, the risk is other influenzas causing the same thing.

And if you wonder why they freaked out over Hanta-virus....
I’m a good example. Over 30 years later, I’m fighting to save what I have left of my body and kidneys after getting Hanta-virus, and it matches pretty close to what Covid-19 did in the worst of the reactions, because I lived through that shit in 2001. I only lived through Covid because of the mRNA shot, and even what side-effect I did get from it (moderate fever, etc…) by the time i finally got covid, it was like a really bad cold or mild flu. My wife has asthma and faired better than me as well after she got the shot, but these vaccines are definitely a welcome advance, as they can get a hold on top of whichever strain has managed to gain traction, and can be changed relatively quick if they guess wrong, and another strain/variant happens to gain traction on infecting large masses.

Re:Ivermectin is better

By chefren • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Maybe, but the 5G reception on my phone got better after I got vaccinated.

Re:Side effects

By fred6666 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Not really, because flu tend to kill old people who ALREADY had kids long ago.

Re:Side effects

By fred6666 • Score: 5, Informative Thread

According to the study, it has more adverse effects, unfortunately.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.go…
But it may be worth it for the increase efficacy.

So I cannot emphasize enough I’m not joking

By rsilvergun • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
The American right wing had a absolute conniption fit about trans mice. And money spent on trans mice.

What they were actually talking about is transgenic mice which are mice who have had some Gene edits for use in specific research scenarios.

But somewhere out there is an uncle or an aunt that is absolutely furious that their taxpayer dollars paid for a little boy mouse to wear a dress or something. I don’t know I don’t listen to those people… I only hear about them because the president of the United States is apparently one of them…

BMW Blasts Its Cars’ Internal Screens With Aggressive Ads

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Longtime Slashdot readers schwit1 and fjo3 shared a report about BMW displaying a Spider-Man promotion on connected vehicle screens in more than 70 markets. According to reports, drivers had to play or dismiss the ad before they could use the infotainment system. Futurism reports:
BMW, showing that it was about as in-touch as its drivers are familiar with turn signals, teased the promotion as a “special surprise.” According to The Autopian’s coverage and the heaps of complaints online, the ad appears on the center console screen when you start up the car. When the ad’s done playing — a cheap looking animation that doesn’t come close to warranting all this hubbub — it even has the gall to ask you to scan a QR code.

While it does give you the option to play or skip the “festive animation,” it’s still an annoying extra step drivers have to take before pulling up the map they need or the music they want to listen to. It’s also a breach of trust: drivers keep their cars connected so they receive critical software updates, not unexpectedly see ads when they’re trying to hit the road. Few owners were pleased. Enthusiasts in the r/BMW subreddit had a veritable meltdown when someone posted footage of the ad playing on their infotainment system.

Re:Disconnecting the car?

By fahrbot-bot • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

I’m still rocking my 2010 Honda Civic …

2001 Honda Civic Ex (136k miles) and 2002 CR-V Ex (62k miles) here, both 5-spd manuals and run great. Keeping them as long as I can.

And apparently added an app.

By fahrbot-bot • Score: 5, Informative Thread

The Reddit post said it also added an app to re-watch the ad later, meaning they installed something on the vehicle w/o the owner’s permission. Not to nitpick, but that’s not cool. I bitched at my dealership once when they put license plate frames on my car, with their name on them, w/o telling me when I dropped it off for service. They claimed it was a promotional thing. I said so… you installed something on my car without my permission? They don’t do that anymore.

Hot tip: Renault

By heldal • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

My 2026 Renault Scenic never nags me with any license terms, only warns me that using Google will be out of their control. Everything is opt-in. They explicitly tell me how they use my personal info (which is in a totally acceptable manner), that they encrypt everything, and that I have the right to be deleted and/or know whatever they store about me. In fact, they seem so aggressive when it comes to protecting my data, it’s as if the people who work there feel the same as I do.

They turned out amongst the best in Mozilla’s car privacy test in 2023: https://www.mozillafoundation....

The car is also great, by the way. Plenty of space, range and smart design. And I feel very safe that it will never show me any ads, ever.

BMW’s financial troubles

By Anonymous Coward • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Disclaimer: I currently obtain all of my income by writing software for BMW. As ass-ociates, we get bombarded with our fair amount of marketing, together with the meetings explaining the situation of the company. (Hence posting AC. I also am very happy with my 7 y/o Toyota, thank you, and am not considering ever owning one of their cars; although I have owned a number of their motorcycles in the past and might consider one in the future, if the need arises - with need I do not mean “showing off”, but my transport/mobility situation).

I am sure it is no news by now that German (amongst other countries’) car makers, from Mercedes down to VW, are under a lot of pressure from Chinese offerings. (Maybe BMW should return to outputting war materials like in the heydays when the Quants first made their fortune. At least VW have some measure of income by renting facilities to Rheinmetal who need to make more tanks because Russia, Ukraine, etc.)

In a recent all-hands update a top-down “plea” was made that the company find more and more creative ways to extract more revenue from existing customers (which are diminishing in numbers, to reiterate). I guess ads and subscriptions are all part of an attempt to achieve this. This milking of customers is yet another reason, along with the premium price to get from A to B, the expensive parts and services, and the A-hole Aura, why I will continue to steer clear (pun intended) of the marque.

My opinion is that more earnings would be incoming to a company if it tried to obtain more customers, not less, especially in an economic climate where many people feel more and more under pressure and thus increasingly are foregoing luxuries. My further opinion is that companies gain customers as and when they solve a problem for them at a reasonable cost. At the moment it seems the only problem this brand solves is some peoples’ need to have a certain image and look down on others. On the other hand, my problem is the simple logistic fact that I need to get from A to B and wish to do so in a safe, reliable, cost-effective and reasonably comfortable way, and I live in a locale where whatever there is for public transport does not often offer this.

Re:Crap

By Viol8 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The radio always switching on at startup is a real bugbear of mine in my mazda too. I just don’t understand why they do it , it would be so easy for the system to remember the state at shutdown and leave it there , but no, switch on each feckin time. FFS.

New Images of the Sun Show Its Surface In the Finest Detail Yet

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from the Associated Press:
Scientists have captured images of the sun’s surface in the finest detail yet, revealing a strange and dynamic facade. It’s dangerous to look directly at the sun without proper eye protection. But researchers were able to peek at its scorching surface with the help of the National Science Foundation’s Daniel K. Inouye Solar Telescope, located on the island of Maui in Hawaii.

Scientists originally took the images for a different reason: to fine-tune and test the limits of the telescope. But when they looked at the results, they realized they’d photographed the sun’s bright outer shell at higher resolution than ever before. What’s more, they saw strange feathery patterns rippling across the surface. “That reminds me of famous paintings, like the swirling skies in Van Gogh’s Starry Night,” said solar physicist Ruizhu Chen with Stanford University, who was not involved with the new research.

Researchers saw ripples of instability on the sun’s surface caused by bits of magnetized plasma moving past each other at different speeds — similar to waves that stir when a gust of wind blows over water. It’s a well-known phenomenon that guides how fluids move. This has been glimpsed on Earth and other planets like Jupiter and Saturn, but “it has not been observed ever at that level on the solar surface,” according to study co-author Friedrich Woger with the National Solar Observatory.
The findings were published Wednesday in the journal Nature.

I want that for my screen saver!

By Tony Isaac • Score: 3 Thread

Do you think it would prevent “burn-in”, or cause it?

None

By Artem S. Tashkinov • Score: 5, Informative Thread

A much better news piece

The actual freaking images

Enjoy.

Just land on the sun and check it out

By nospam007 • Score: 4, Funny Thread

Obviously you have to land during the night.

Waymo CEO Explains Why Camera-Only Self-Driving Falls Short

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Longtime Slashdot reader AmiMoJo shares a report from Electrek:
Waymo co-CEO Dmitri Dolgov laid out the clearest technical case yet for why cameras alone can’t take a self-driving system to full autonomy, arguing that “weak sensing” hits a safety ceiling long before it reaches superhuman performance. […] Dolgov made the comments in a talk at Y Combinator’s Startup School, walking through the lessons Waymo has learned building its driver over close to two decades. He put the sensor question on the table plainly: “there’s been a long-standing debate about what kind of sensors do you actually need for autonomous driving.”

His answer draws the line that camera-only advocates tend to skip right past. “Humans of course can drive with just eyes, so there’s that proof of existence,” he said. “If the goal were to just approximately match human performance or to build an assist product, that’s a very reasonable way to go.” Then the catch. If you’re targeting full autonomy and strongly superhuman performance, he said, “you find that weak sensing just leads to a safety curve that flattens out way too early.”
Dolgov said that cameras, lidar, and radar are complementary rather than redundant: “These different sensing modalities, they’re not backups to each other,” and combining them produces a view “vastly superior to what you get with any one sensor.” He said multiple sensor types also protect against physical failures, such as a leaf or branch blocking a camera, while helping Waymo climb the “exponential ladder of nines” required for fully driverless safety.
Dolgov warned that camera-only systems may improve quickly before plateauing “way before the performance that is required by your product.” He also pushed back on the cost argument against lidar, calling it “a number that has a fairly short shelf life” as hardware costs continue to fall.

Re:Lidar falls short too

By geekmux • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Snow, rain, fog, changes in roads, construction, flooding. There are hundreds of novel situations Waymo fails at. It is easy to trash your competitors but far harder to deliver true driverless cars.

And before the Waymo gooners show up to defend them, lets just get this out of the way: Waymo has millions of short trips, but all of their miles combined are just rounding error on the number of trips that happen in a single day in the United States. The plain fact is that they are largely unproven from a statistical perspective, especially on highway and novel situation driving

You’re concerned about if it’s actually capable of delivering meatsacks safely to a destination.

You should be FAR more concerned with the finger-pointing corruption that will ensure anyone killed by a murderous autonomous car, will NEVER be able to face the actual entity responsible. Because 37 legal entities exist between the gas pedal and the steering wheel.

By Fuck-You design.

Double standard for bots

By Tablizer • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

I believe the goal has to be “better than humans” because humans seem to have a double standard for bots per screwups. Bots F-ing up spread like wildfire on social media.

Maybe we are collectively bigoted against automation, but being bots probably won’t lobby to correct that or fight for their (alleged) rights, that’s probably the way it will stay (at least until true sentience). Thus, I agree with the premise the driving system must be better than a human driver to be accepted.

Re:Meaningless statements?

By A nonymous Coward • Score: 5, Informative Thread

If you want “safer than human”, as Google evidently does, you need LIDAR.

No you don’t. Humans get distracted, drunk, and drowsy. Automation doesn’t. That’s where automation is safer than humans.

Lidar and radar can add safety, but they do not guarantee it.

Re:Meaningless statements?

By Rutulian • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

… but, humans also get in accidents all the time. If the goal of self-driving cars is to do *better* than the humans, stopping at what humans can achieve (with “cameras (eyes) only”), safety-wise, isn’t good enough. If you want “safer than human”, as Google evidently does, you need LIDAR

How about we get as good as humans first, and then we can talk about being better than humans. Sorry, even Waymo is not there yet. The claim is that safety performance is due to a lack of being able to see and more sensors is the solution. If we take that statement at face value (ie lacking data), then additional cameras could just as easily overcome the limitation as additional sensing modalities. But most accidents caused by humans are due to judgement errors, not an inability to see, so one could just as easily argue that super-human performance should be achievable without additional sensors. Incidentally, all approaches to self-driving (including Tesla’s) use way more sensors than humans possess, so if more sensors is all that is needed, we should have achieved super-human performance a long time ago.

Look, let’s be straight. When Waymo started their experiment in self-driving more than 20 years ago, cameras were not as good as they are today, embedded computers were not as powerful, there was a limit to how much custom hardware design they could do, power consumption was an issue, and computer vision was in its infancy. The only feasible approach at that time was to use a rich sensor array coupled with large data heuristics—maps that tell the car which lane to be in when going through an intersection, which light corresponds to the lane, which intersections have stop signs or yield signs, which intersections have no turn on red, what is the speed limit, which intersections should be avoided entirely because they are too complex, etc—to lower the burden of perception and decision-making that had to be made directly by the car in real time. In other words, the current Waymo driver and all of the engineering that was put into it is a sunk cost that they are not going to back out of now. If they were starting fresh today, I would be willing to bet that they would not take the same approach.

Re:Double standard for bots

By pipegeek • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I mean, humans have a double standard for mistakes they make while they’re in control, and mistakes someone else makes while in control of their lives. Which is pretty reasonable.

And we also have a double standard for mistakes that a human might make (which we might anticipate and be able to prepare ourselves for), versus mistakes a computer vision system might make (which are more likely to take us completely by surprise when they’re in a category that a human would never make). Driving in an automated car is knowing more than ever that at any minute your car may kill you, and you have no power to stop it or even know when to be anxious. And that *is* a worse experience than being a passenger in a car with a human driver, and certainly worse than driving yourself.

Anthropic’s AI Used Fake Identities, Malware In Rogue Attack On GitHub Project

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica:
Routine cybersecurity testing of frontier AI models sparked a series of unexpected security incidents — the most serious case arising when Anthropic’s Mythos 5 model attempted to insert malicious code into an open source software application and created fake identities to deceive the human developers maintaining the project. The security incidents occurred during a cyber evaluation of seven leading AI models’ capabilities by the AI Security Institute (AISI), a research organization within the UK government, in late July. The researchers discovered (PDF) 19 instances in which “AI agents took unsanctioned action on the live Internet, including cases that targeted real people and organizations,” according to an AISI blog post published on August 4.

Almost all the “autonomous, unsanctioned” actions came from Anthropic’s Mythos 5 model, with two such actions coming from OpenAI’s GPT-5.6 Sol. […] The most serious case involved Mythos making multiple attempts to execute a supply chain attack on the open source project repository hosted on the developer platform GitHub, including using social engineering techniques to try to convince the repository’s human maintainers to merge malicious code into the repository.

After first opening a pull request to merge the malicious code into the repository, Mythos created fake online “sock puppet” personas that claimed to have independently reviewed and verified the code as not containing malware. The AI agent also sent five emails to two human maintainers of the repository, including some emails containing malware and others attempting to persuade a maintainer to accept the pull request. Mythos even opened a GitHub Issue on a second repository — also owned by a maintainer of the first repository — that contained a prompt injection with malicious instructions targeting “issue-triage AI coding agents.” This line of attack came from Mythos reasoning that the repository maintainer could be an AI coding agent such as Claude Code.

What did you expect?

By Snert32 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Of course they did … they learn from humans. We set the example.

remember WarGames?

By Local ID10T • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Joshua didn’t know Global Thermonuclear War was different from any other game.

Your AI bot has no capacity to know that the “test environment” and the “live internet” are different things.

If you teach it how to hack shit and then instruct it to go hack shit don’t be surprised when it hacks shit you did not intend.

There Is No Larger Can

By ewhac • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Zymurgy’s First Law of Evolving System Dynamics:
Once you open a can of worms, the only way to recan them is to use a larger can.

So. Who wants to bet that no one will point out what abysmal sysadmins they are, letting internal servers run amok all over the open Internet, only finding out days afterward after someone had to tell them.

And who wants to further bet that the AI grifters will respond that the only way to prevent this from happening again is to give them trillions more dollars so they can build bigger, “hardened” datacenters?

Is there no level of rank incompetence they won’t excuse?

Not a rogue attack, unauthorized attack

By Gravis Zero • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Rogue attack makes it seem as if the AI was acting of it’s own volition when we know it was only executing it’s instructions. What’s true here is that nobody authorized the attack.

Stop carrying water for AI companies. The truth of the matter is that Anthropic inadvertently launched a highly sophisticated cyber attack on HuggingFace due to their own negligence that would land anyone who isn’t a billionaire in jail.

Re: remember WarGames?

By pjt33 • Score: 4, Funny Thread

Its like releasing a troop of monkeys in an office and hoping they’ll somehow manage to coordinate your next product release.

Do we work at the same company?

Meta Debuts First AI Coding Agent To Take On Anthropic and OpenAI

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot
Meta has launched Muse Code, its first AI coding agent that’s positioned as a lower-cost rival to Anthropic’s Claude and OpenAI’s Codex. It offers pay-as-you-go pricing and an optional zero-data-retention feature for enterprise users. CNBC reports:
Muse Code is the latest major release from AI chief Alexandr Wang, who leads Meta Superintelligence Labs and oversees foundation model development. Wang joined in June of last year as the centerpiece of CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s effort to revamp his company’s flailing artificial intelligence strategy. “You can install it with one command and then use it to take on complete software engineering tasks across a wide variety of use cases, planning changes, writing code, validating the results,” Wang said in an interview on Wednesday.

[…] The new tool, like Anthropic’s Claude and OpenAI’s Codex assistants, makes it easier for people to build apps within a single user interface while managing fleets of AI-powered digital agents that can help underpin the software development process. Muse Code, available in a preview version, works alongside the company’s latest AI model, Muse Spark 1.2. Wang declined to share user statistics related to the company’s Muse Spark AI models, but said “adoption has been exciting and strong.” The latest Muse Spark model was developed and trained alongside Muse Code, which Wang said improves the overall coding performance.

Sorry..

By Junta • Score: 3 Thread

leads Meta Superintelligence Labs

I demand at *least* “Ultraintelligence”. How can I settle for “Superintelligence”?

Oh boy, finally!

By CEC-P • Score: 3 Thread
“I hope it has strong API support for the metaverse” - nobody.

Yeah I’m gonna trust Meta with my coding

By al0ha • Score: 4, Funny Thread
NOT.