Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. SpaceX Strikes Deal With Coding Startup Cursor For $60 Billion
  2. Florida Launches Criminal Investigation Into ChatGPT Over School Shooting
  3. Mozilla Uses Anthropic’s Mythos To Fix 271 Bugs In Firefox
  4. Framework Laptop 13 Pro Is a Major Overhaul For the Modular, Upgradeable Laptop
  5. Job Cuts Driven By AI Are Rising On Wall Street
  6. Meta To Start Capturing Employee Mouse Movements, Keystrokes For AI Training Data
  7. Google’s Internal Politics Leave It Playing Catch-Up On AI Coding
  8. Xbox Game Pass Ultimate Gets a Price Cut
  9. Global Growth In Solar ‘the Largest Ever Observed For Any Source’
  10. Maryland Becomes First State To Pass Bill Banning ‘Surveillance Pricing’
  11. Amazon To Invest Up To Another $25 Billion In Anthropic
  12. iPhone Video Shows ‘Earthset’ From Space
  13. PlayStation To Require Age Verification For Messages and Voice Chat
  14. Mobile Phones To Be Banned In Schools In England Under New Plans
  15. Apple CEO Tim Cook Is Stepping Down

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

SpaceX Strikes Deal With Coding Startup Cursor For $60 Billion

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from the New York Times:
SpaceX, Elon Musk’s rocket and satellite company, said on Tuesday that it had struck a deal with the artificial intelligence start-up Cursor that could result in its acquiring the young company for $60 billion. SpaceX is making the deal just as it prepares to go public in what is likely to be one of the largest initial public offerings ever. In a social media post, SpaceX said the combination with Cursor, which makes code-writing software, would “allow us to build the world’s most useful” A.I. models.

SpaceX added that the agreement gave it the option “to acquire Cursor later this year for $60 billion or pay $10 billion for our work together.” It is unclear if the companies plan to consummate the deal before or after SpaceX’s I.P.O., which could happen as early as June. […] Cursor, which has raised more than $3 billion in funding, was founded in 2022 and made waves as a fast-growing A.I. start-up. It was under pressure in recent months after OpenAI and Anthropic announced competing code-writing products that were embraced by tech companies. Cursor had been in talks to raise funding in recent weeks.

Why??

By haruchai • Score: 3 Thread

Elon already has the bestest brain & most superduper sentient AI?
Surely Grok will attain cosmic consciousness before the end of the year, right?

Florida Launches Criminal Investigation Into ChatGPT Over School Shooting

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Florida’s attorney general has launched a criminal investigation into OpenAI over allegations that the accused gunman in a shooting at Florida State University last year used ChatGPT to help plan the attack. OpenAI says the chatbot is “not responsible for this terrible crime” and only provided factual information available from public sources. NPR reports:
The Republican attorney general, James Uthmeier, said at a press conference in Tampa on Tuesday that accused gunman Phoenix Ikner consulted ChatGPT for advice before the shooting, including what type of gun to use, what ammunition went with it, and what time to go to campus to encounter more people, according to an initial review of Ikner’s chat logs. “My prosecutors have looked at this and they’ve told me, if it was a person on the other end of that screen, we would be charging them with murder,” Uthmeier said. “We cannot have AI bots that are advising people on how to kill others.”

Uthmeier’s office is issuing subpoenas to OpenAI seeking information about its policies and internal training materials related to user threats of harm and how it cooperates with and reports crimes to law enforcement, dating back to March 2024. At the press conference, Uthmeier acknowledged the investigation is entering into uncharted territory and is uncertain about whether OpenAI has criminal liability. “We are going to look at who knew what, designed what, or should have done what,” he said. “And if it is clear that individuals knew that this type of dangerous behavior might take place, that these types of unfortunate, tragic events might take place, and nevertheless still turned to profit, still allowed this business to operate, then people need to be held accountable.”

[…] Ikner, 21, is facing multiple charges of murder and attempted murder for the April 2025 shooting near the student union on FSU’s Tallahassee campus, where he was a student at the time. His trial is set to begin on Oct. 19. According to court filings, more than 200 AI messages have been entered into evidence in the case.

I’m not buying it

By tech10171968 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
I remember when Columbine happened. I also remembered when the Federal building in Oklahoma got blown up. Guess what WAS’T around back then? That’s right: OpenAI wasn’t a thing. But those events still happened. Blaming a chatbot for a tragedy is like blaming McDonald’s for your obesity: even if the restaurant didn’t exist, you were going to end up in that condition because of your eating habits anyhow. The name of the restaurant might have changed but the song remains the same. This guy had it in his head to shoot up the school, OpenAI or no OpenAI. Rounds were going to fly downrange even if AI didn’t exist. This is some lazy logic.

Anything to avoid the topic of gun control

By Powercntrl • Score: 3, Interesting Thread

The Republican attorney general, James Uthmeier, said at a press conference in Tampa on Tuesday that accused gunman Phoenix Ikner consulted ChatGPT for advice before the shooting, including what type of gun to use, what ammunition went with it …

All questions that your local gun store clerk would be more than happy to answer for you.

and what time to go to campus to encounter more people

I’m fairly certain Google Maps also lists busy times for specific locations, at least it does for restaurants and stores.

This is all very on-brand from Florida, a place where according to Republican logic, this is not supposed to happen because open carry should’ve brought all those supposed “good guys with a gun” out of the woodwork. Gee, I can’t possibly imagine why more guns isn’t making us safer. /s

Re:Chatbot Lies

By SomePoorSchmuck • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Exactly, next people are going to be doing legal discovery on levi’s jeans because the jeans helped the shooter keep his balls from flapping during the shooting. Stop trying to blame tools and keep the blame squarely on the human that does the evil thing.

Osama bin Laden was not on any of the planes that flew into buildings. All he did was sit there and help plan and train the people who did it.

Or, you go to a construction demolitions expert and ask him what’s the best way to place explosives around the football stadium to make sure the exits collapse first so no one can escape. He looks at floor plans and pics, tells you what supplies you need, where to plant the charges, and how to rig the IEDs to blow simultaneously.
But all he gave you was information, so he has no legal or moral culpability for the death and destruction you cause?

Re:Chatbot Lies

By ClickOnThis • Score: 4 Thread

I don’t think the alleged shooter is stupid. He was a student at the university where the shooting took place. I’d be more inclined to think he is mentally ill.

As for the makers of ChatGPT being stupid — no I don’t think that either. They’re among the smartest people on the planet. If anything I’d say they were careless, for not building a red-flag alert into their product that reports suspicious behavior. Maybe there should be laws that require such a thing.

And that leaves ChatGPT itself, which I am not inclined to call stupid, mentally ill, or careless. I’m not ready (yet) to give it that agency.

Re:Chatbot Lies

By WaffleMonster • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Osama bin Laden was not on any of the planes that flew into buildings. All he did was sit there and help plan and train the people who did it.

Or, you go to a construction demolitions expert and ask him what’s the best way to place explosives around the football stadium to make sure the exits collapse first so no one can escape. He looks at floor plans and pics, tells you what supplies you need, where to plant the charges, and how to rig the IEDs to blow simultaneously.
But all he gave you was information, so he has no legal or moral culpability for the death and destruction you cause?

Machines don’t have agency. If you use technology to help you commit crimes you are the one with agency and so you are blamed for it.

Mozilla Uses Anthropic’s Mythos To Fix 271 Bugs In Firefox

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
BrianFagioli writes:
Mozilla says it used an early version of Anthropic’s Claude Mythos Preview to comb through Firefox’s code, and the results were hard to ignore. In Firefox 150, the team fixed 271 vulnerabilities identified during this effort, a number that would have been unthinkable not long ago. Instead of relying only on fuzzing tools or human review, the AI was able to reason through code and surface issues that typically require highly specialized expertise.

The bigger implication is less about one release and more about where this is heading. Security has long favored attackers, since they only need to find a single flaw while defenders have to protect everything. If AI can scale vulnerability discovery for defenders, that dynamic could start to shift. It does not mean zero days disappear overnight, but it suggests a future where bugs are found and fixed faster than attackers can weaponize them.
“Computers were completely incapable of doing this a few months ago, and now they excel at it,” says Mozilla in a blog post. “We have many years of experience picking apart the work of the world’s best security researchers, and Mythos Preview is every bit as capable. So far we’ve found no category or complexity of vulnerability that humans can find that this model can’t.”
The company concluded: “The defects are finite, and we are entering a world where we can finally find them all.”

Re:Identify != Fix

By higuita • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

>The headline and the summary don’t seem to quite agree here
why not!?

The main pain of security issues is finding them!!
After claude found the issues, humans could check and fix them, that for many issues isn’t that hard. Again the hard part is pinpoint that some check fails to catch a corner case or a buffer may have the wrong size

What does this mean for old software?

By schwit1 • Score: 3 Thread

What does this mean for older software that’s no longer being patched?

The next few patch Tuesdays could be interesting.

We need humility, not arrogance

By davidwr • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

“The defects are finite, and we are entering a world where we can finally find them all.”

We may be entering a world where we can find 99.44% of bugs and we may find the “easy to find ones” a lot faster than we would find them today, but it’s very arrogant to declare “we are entering a world where we can finally find them all" given how many unknowns are still out there.

Yes, the progress is good, but we need some humility and we need to be realistic with our expectations.

Re:It’s a 2-way street

By ZP-Blight • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Finite means there’s only so many bugs in the code, once you fix them all, there are no more bugs to exploit.

And if you have this scanning capability, you can test the code before it’s exposed to the general public as a release, minimizing future potential mishaps.

Re:We need humility, not arrogance

By belg4mit • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Isn’t claiming that a magical computer program can find all bugs in another program effectively a variation on the halting problem?

Framework Laptop 13 Pro Is a Major Overhaul For the Modular, Upgradeable Laptop

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica:
Framework has been selling and shipping its modular, repairable, upgradable Laptop 13 for five years now, and in that time, it has released six distinct versions of its system board, each using fresh versions of Intel and AMD processors (seven versions, if you count this RISC-V one). The laptop around those components has gradually gotten better, too. Over the years, Framework has added higher-resolution screens in both matte and glossy finishes, a slightly larger battery, and other tweaked components that refine the original design. But so far, all of those parts have been totally interchangeable, and the fundamentals of the Laptop 13 design haven’t changed much.

That changes today with the Framework Laptop 13 Pro, which, despite its name, is less an offshoot of the original Laptop 13 and closer to a ground-up redesign. It includes new Core Ultra Series 3 chips (codenamed Panther Lake), Framework’s first touchscreen, a new black aluminum color option, a larger battery, and other significant changes. And while it sacrifices some component compatibility with the original Laptop 13, displays and motherboards remain interchangeable, so Framework Laptop owners can buy the new Core Ultra board and owners of older Framework Laptop boards can pop one into a Pro to benefit from the new battery and screen. At 1.4kg (about 3 pounds), the Laptop 13 Pro is slightly heavier than the Laptop 13’s 1.3kg, but it still stacks up well against the 14-inch M5 MacBook Pro (1.55kg, or 3.4 pounds).

The Framework Laptop Pro will start at $1,199 for a DIY edition with a Core Ultra 5 325 processor, and no RAM, SSD, or operating system. A prebuilt version with Ubuntu Linux installed will start at $1,499, and Windows 11 will cost another $100 on top of that. A Core Ultra X7 358H version starts at $1,599 for a DIY edition, and a “limited batch” Core Ultra X9 388H version starts at $1,799. A bare motherboard with the Core Ultra 5 325 starts at $449, while a Core Ultra X7 358H board will cost $799. Pre-orders are available now, and begin shipping in June.

Job Cuts Driven By AI Are Rising On Wall Street

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Firms like Bank of America, Citi, Wells Fargo, and others are reporting strong profits while reducing head count and automating more work. “All of them credited A.I. to some degree … in areas ranging from the so-called back office, where tens of thousands of employees fill out paperwork to comply with various laws and regulations, to the front office, where seven-figure salaried professionals put together complicated financial transactions for corporate clients,” reports the New York Times. From the report:
Less than four months ago, Bank of America’s chief executive, Brian T. Moynihan, volunteered in a TV interview what he would say to his 210,000 employees about the chance of artificial intelligence replacing human work. “You don’t have to worry,” he said. “It’s not a threat to their jobs.” Last week, after Bank of America reported $8.6 billion in profit for the first quarter — $1.6 billion more than the same period a year earlier — Mr. Moynihan struck a different tone. The bank’s bottom line, he said, was helped by shedding 1,000 jobs through attrition by “eliminating work and applying technology,” which he repeatedly specified was artificial intelligence. He predicted more of that in the months and years to come. “A.I. gives us places to go we haven’t gone,” Mr. Moynihan said.

The veneer of Wall Street’s longstanding assertion — that A.I. will enhance human work, not replace it — is rapidly peeling away, as evidenced by the current quarterly earnings season. JPMorgan Chase, Citi, Bank of America, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and Wells Fargo racked up $47 billion in collective profits, up 18 percent, while shedding 15,000 employees. All of them credited A.I. to some degree with helping cut jobs and automate work in areas ranging from the so-called back office, where tens of thousands of employees fill out paperwork to comply with various laws and regulations, to the front office, where seven-figure salaried professionals put together complicated financial transactions for corporate clients.

Unlike executives in Silicon Valley, few major financial figures are stating outright that A.I. is eliminating jobs. Citi, for example, has pledged to shrink its work force by 20,000 people through what one executive described to financial analysts last week as the company’s “productivity and efficiency journey.” The bank is paying for A.I. software from Anthropic, Google, Microsoft and OpenAI, to automatically read legal documents, approve account openings, send invoices for trades and organize sensitive customer data, among other tasks, according to public statements by bank executives and two people familiar with Citi’s systems. Among the recent job cuts at Citi were scores of employees who were part of the bank’s “A.I. Champions and Accelerators” program, according to the two people, who were not permitted by the bank to speak publicly. The program involves Citi employees who perform their day jobs while also working to persuade their colleagues to adopt A.I. technologies.

A few things to keep in mind

By rsilvergun • Score: 3, Insightful Thread
First yeah we’re all going to chime in and say this will backfire.

It doesn’t matter if it does. It’s a blows up and costs a business some money odds are very good that the savings from wages will more than cover that.

What’s worse is because we don’t enforce antitrust law if a company goes down to tubes because it relied too heavily on AI it can just buy out any potential competitors and jack up prices on products you need to live and make back all the money.

Second there’s basically two possibilities here, either the AI works and they got the fire a bunch of people or the AI doesn’t work but they fired them anyway and the survivors have to work harder to keep their jobs.

Remember no antitrust law enforcement so if you get shit canned and try to start a business then you will be targeted and best case scenario you might get a buyout if you are under the radar long enough but more likely they just run you out of business.

Companies don’t need good products anymore because they don’t have to compete. So there is no floor and they can make things as shitty as they want and if you have a problem with it tough shit.

You could of course just stop consuming all together but at the very least you need food and shelter and medicine and some minimal financial services and transportation. So good luck stopping all consumption.

The point I’m getting at is that fundamental underpinnings of a functional economy have broken down and we refuse to acknowledge that fact.

Will AI ever replace the CEO?

By dschnur • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Here’s a dystopian thought:

What if the first person to go was the CEO?

Would they still be pushing so hard to use AI?

Re:A few things to keep in mind

By nightflameauto • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The change that will need to take place will not happen until we see a world where company profits are decimated by the fact that no company employs enough humans to continue to drive consumerism. We decided a long time ago, at least here in the United States, that corporations are more important than people. We won’t care when people are hurt. We’ll care when companies are hurt. And the only hurt those entities understand is loss of profit.

Of course, the usual government reaction to loss of profits is to hand over tax dollars to the corporations to help them tide themselves over until the next wave of consumerism. If we end up in a world where there aren’t enough people working to provide the government with income tax on a regular basis, and there aren’t enough consumers to provide sales tax or a regular basis, and enough people are rendered homeless to start cutting into property taxes outside the larger corporate entities, then the government will have to come up with a new plan other than, “hand over money we can no longer provide.” As much fun as it’s been for them to pretend continually creating money from nothing is somehow providing it, that cycle is about to hit an end-point nobody’s really ready for.

It’s gonna get real interesting as automation continues to impact the workforce. What’s really sad is we’ve seen signs it could happen coming for a while now, and no one with the power to do anything about it, or prepare for it, is willing to do anything more than preach about how glorious the future will be when no one can work a steady job and no one has the money from work to be able to consume as the entire economy requires to keep lubricated and running.

Re:Equilibrium

By Brain-Fu • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Every single one of us knew that eliminating workers was the primary reason for the worldwide interest in AI. Everyone who said anything to the contrary was lying, and everyone who heard them knew it. Absolutely zero people believed that AI was going to lead us to some strange utopia where everyone was paid for work they didn’t have to do anymore. The article’s tone “oh look, they made all this money and didn’t hire more people and its because of AI and oh what hypocrites they are!” is just silly. This is exactly what literally everyone knew would happen.

Well, except those who believed, and still believe, that AI just won’t work. That remains a possibility too. Maybe this will all fall apart. I can’t see the future better than anyone else. But the one and only thing that would prevent AI-enabled mass layoffs would be AI’s own failure to shoulder the load. If it can, it will, and the industry absolutely will let go of everyone they can, as soon as they can, without any inhibitions. That’s just how humans work, so we can count on it.

Warnings about how this might result in a depression won’t stay anyone’s hand. Mocking the industry leaders for creating an economy where nobody can afford the stuff they produce; won’t make them bat an eye. None of those words change their incentives, and their incentives will be acted-upon, even if it leads us straight into the greatest depression in world history.

Legal regulation might change things. But it is extremely hard to pass regulation that is not enthusiastically endorsed by the oligarchy that actually runs our government. So, it won’t happen until the fallout from the depression hits the wealthy’s financial base hard enough for them to want the regulation.

We are going to have to go through hell in order to get to heaven. Or even purgatory.

Re:Equilibrium

By machineghost • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Yes, but not at first: it took awhile before the whole Ford factory line thing even started.

Meanwhile, companies using AI employ lots of people too. It’s very possible AI will open entire categories of employment we can’t dream of yet (just like 1920’s Americans couldn’t have dreamed of working at a Ford plant).

Again, it’s just how technology works … but it’s not our real problem. Our real problem is all the wealth concentrated in a handful of individuals. It would be a problem whether we had amazing new technology, or not.

Meta To Start Capturing Employee Mouse Movements, Keystrokes For AI Training Data

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Reuters reports that Meta plans to start collecting U.S.-based employees’ mouse movements, clicks, keystrokes, and occasional screen snapshots to train AI agents that can better learn how humans use computers. The tool, called Model Capability Initiative (MCI), will reportedly “not be used for performance assessments or any other purpose besides model training and that safeguards were in place to protect ‘sensitive content.’" From the report:
Meta CTO Andrew Bosworth told employees in a separate memo shared on Monday that the company would step up internal data collection as part of those “AI for Work” efforts, now re-branded as Agent Transformation Accelerator (ATA). “The vision we are building towards is one where our agents primarily do the work and our role is to direct, review and help them improve,” Bosworth said. The aim, he added, was for agents to “automatically see where we felt the need to intervene so they can be better next time.” Bosworth did not explicitly spell out how those agents would be trained, but said Meta would be “rigorous” about “building up data and evals for all the types of interactions we have as we go about our work.”

Meta spokesperson Andy Stone acknowledged that the MCI data would be among the inputs. […] “If we’re building agents to help people complete everyday tasks using computers, our models need real examples of how people “actually use them — things like mouse movements, clicking buttons, and navigating dropdown menus,” said Stone.

I was wondering what they were going to do

By rsilvergun • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
AI training data was going to be the major problem and sticking point. Previously they could just soak it up for free from the internet but now that the internet is 70% AI slop that’s not really going to work.

It does still raise the question of how the name of hell are we going to train AI to do programming tasks when we’ve replaced most of the programmers. But I guess we will cross that bridge when we come to it. I suspect that over time programming languages will be built AI first and programmer second.

One thing is for sure everything is going to keep getting worse and worse and worse. And we are going to keep blaming the wrong people because that’s what we’ve always done.

There is NO way this will help users…

By Voyager529 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

our models need real examples of how people “actually use them — things like mouse movements, clicking buttons, and navigating dropdown menus,” said Stone.

This is the quiet part Stone is saying out loud - the point is to alter UIs.

Now, the data itself is *probably* helpful…but I am hard pressed to think of ANY application - desktop, mobile, or web - that ANY user would describe as having improved over the past decade. From the disappearance of colors and contrast and borders and scroll bars, to ‘settings’ screens getting their options eliminated, to toolbar buttons losing their text labels, to modal dialogs and overlays and “hints and tips” taking the place of pop-up ads everywhere…there is VERY little software that has gotten better, despite decades of traditional feedback from users.

Meta is absolutely going to use this to ascertain how users have figured out to work around the dark patterns and user-hostile design users have spent the past two decades battling, and making it even more difficult and exhausting to get anything done.

Even if I bought that employees wouldn’t be penalized for what the brass finds after putting North-Korean-grade spyware on their computers, there is zero indicating that Meta will be using this to improve anyone’s user experience in a way that the user would agree is, in fact an improvement.

Re:Right.

By 93 Escort Wagon • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

These people are already employed by Meta. They know what to expect… they’ve been enabling it themselves, after all.

Re:Right.

By goldspider • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Why would anyone want to work for a company that does stuff like this??

Re:Three reasons

By Narcocide • Score: 5, Funny Thread

4) Continued admission to the Satanic orgies

Google’s Internal Politics Leave It Playing Catch-Up On AI Coding

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Bloomberg:
At Google, leaders are anxious about falling behind in the race to offer AI coding tools, especially as rivals like Anthropic PBC offer more effective and popular tools to businesses, according to people familiar with the matter. The search giant is now working to unite some of its coding initiatives under one banner to speed progress and take advantage of a surge in customer interest. In some corners of Alphabet’s Google, particularly AI lab DeepMind, concerns about the company’s position are mounting, according to current and former employees and executives, who declined to be named because they weren’t authorized to speak publicly.

Businesses are just starting to realize that AI coding tools can enable anyone to build products by prompting a chatbot. But Google doesn’t have a clear solution for them. Its Gemini model’s capabilities are sprinkled across half a dozen different coding products with different branding, indicating how the company’s lack of focus and competing internal efforts have hampered success, the people said. Even internally, some Google engineers prefer to use Anthropic’s Claude Code, they said. More concerning, the people said, are the engineers who are struggling to adopt AI coding at all. […] Google’s emphasis on its own technology has also complicated the push to catch up. Most employees are banned from using competing tools such as Claude Code or Codex due to security concerns, but Googlers can request exceptions if they can demonstrate they have a business case, one former employee said. Some teams at DeepMind, including those working on the Gemini model, internal applications, and open source models, use Claude Code, according to three former employees. “You want the best people to use the best tool, even inside Google,” one of the former employees said. […]

In recent years, DeepMind has tried to tighten control over how its AI breakthroughs are woven into Google products. Last year, Google appointed Kavukcuoglu to a new position as chief AI architect, a role in which he is charged with folding generative AI into Google products. Yet confusion about who is leading the charge on AI coding persists. Along with DeepMind, Google Cloud, Google Core, Google Labs and Android are all pushing AI coding in different ways, one of the people said. […] Within the Googleplex, there is a philosophical clash between AI researchers who want to move as quickly as possible and more traditional senior engineers who have exacting standards for code quality, former employees say. AI usage is factored into performance reviews, according to a former employee. But engineers who try to use internal AI coding tools often hit capacity constraints due to competition for computing power, the former employee said.

Chief Toe-sucking Officer

By Pseudonymous Powers • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
One problem here is that, the better these tools work, the dumber your developers get, faster.

Re:Chief Toe-sucking Officer

By Junta • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Anecdote to back this up, we have annual round of employee directed projects where people propose something they will do that no one asked for in hopes that they do something unexpected that’s worthwhile. Generally it’s a waste of time business wise, but at least people get to work on something they actually believe in.

Anyway, usually they at least usually manage to create a somewhat working demo of their concept, but this year most of them failed to do so, because most of the pitches were people that didn’t know how to do the work, but GenAI was able to generate pitch material that convinced executives to approve them and largely drowned out the people with actionable proposals. So most of the final presentations were people just repeating their pitch and hoping people didn’t notice they had no new material since their pitch a few months back.

“enable anyone to build products”? No. Not at all.

By gweihir • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

What anyone can build is stings on the level of a child’s crayon drawing. Suitable for mock-ups and maybe UI testing, but not production-ready at all. Unless you want to get massive inefficiencies, downtimes, no maintainability and get hacked as soon as some halfway competent attacker finds the time to.

Missed opportunity

By hcs_$reboot • Score: 4, Informative Thread
It’s a shame that Google didn’t make better use of their early ideas on LLMs, especially the 2017 paper “Attention Is All You Need”, which was mainly intended for machine translation.

Xbox Game Pass Ultimate Gets a Price Cut

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Microsoft is cutting the monthly price of Xbox Game Pass Ultimate and PC Game Pass, but the tradeoff is that new Call of Duty releases will no longer arrive on the service at launch. Instead, they’ll show up about a year later. The Verge reports:
After Xbox CEO Asha Sharma admitted last week that “Game Pass has become too expensive for players,” Microsoft is dropping the price of Xbox Game Pass Ultimate and PC Game Pass. Starting today, Xbox Game Pass Ultimate drops from $29.99 to $22.99 a month, and PC Game Pass moves to $13.99, down from $16.49 a month.

The price drops are being fueled in part by future of Call of Duty titles no longer joining Game Pass Ultimate or PC Game Pass at launch. “New Call of Duty games will be added to Game Pass Ultimate and PC Game Pass during the following holiday season (about a year later), while existing Call of Duty titles already in the library will continue to be available,” says Microsoft.

Global Growth In Solar ‘the Largest Ever Observed For Any Source’

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
The IEA says 2025 marked a turning point for global energy, with solar posting the largest growth ever seen for any energy source and helping carbon-free power outpace rising demand. The trend led the agency to declare that the world has entered the “Age of Electricity.” Ars Technica reports:
The IEA report covers energy use, including the electrical grid, transportation, home heating, and other forms of consumption. As such, it can track how some of those uses are shifting, as electric vehicles displace some gasoline use and heat pumps replace gas and oil heating. It also saw a more global trend: The demand for electricity grew at twice the rate of overall energy demand. All of these went into the conclusion that we’re starting the Age of Electricity. In terms of specifics, the IEA saw electric vehicle demand rise by nearly 40 percent, with electric car sales being a quarter of the total of cars sold last year. While that’s having a measurable effect on electricity demand, it remains relatively small at the moment. It’s almost certain to be contributing to the size of the rise in oil use last year: 0.7 percent. In absolute terms, that’s less than half the average rise of the previous decade.

[…] When it comes to supplying electrons for those alternatives, the central story is solar power. “The absolute increase of solar PV generation in 2025 is the largest ever observed for any source,” the IEA says, “excluding years marked by rebounds from global economic shocks such as COVID-19.” In other words, with nothing in particular driving the energy markets in 2025, Solar’s growth was unprecedented. On its own, its growth covered a quarter of the rising demand for all forms of energy. If you limit it to electricity, increased solar production covered over two-thirds of the increased demand. Overall, solar generated over 2,700 terawatt-hours last year, more than double its output from three years earlier. It now accounts for over 8 percent of the world’s total electricity production. Thirty individual countries installed at least a gigawatt of solar last year, and it is now the single largest grid source by capacity (though other sources still outproduce it at the moment).

“China is evil”

By AnOnyxMouseCoward • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
While state media and propagandist keep telling us China is evil for so many reasons, they’re building robots, cars, their own AI-inference chips, and also more renewable resources than anyone else worldwide. This is an excerpt from the article:

“While China commissioned a lot of coal plants in 2025, those were largely started during a prior energy shock. China actually saw its coal use for electricity drop last year due to its massive investment in renewables (China was responsible for 60 percent of renewable global growth last year).

Last year, nuclear remained stable, with about 3 GW of newly commissioned plants offsetting the retirement of 3 GW elsewhere. China is the major player here, too, with enough plants under construction that it will eventually surpass the US in installed nuclear capacity if all of them are commissioned. Twelve GW of new plants started construction last year, with nine of the 10 total plants being located in China.

We’re witnessing the fall of an empire and the rise of another one in real time.

Re: yes drnb

By zmollusc • Score: 5, Funny Thread

You shouldn’t tie yourself down to one energy technology, it is better to take a mix-and-match approach, which is why I recently installed coal panels on my roof.

Re:Once again, la Presidenta loses

By battingly • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Global oil shipment could be stopped today and the US would continue to meet internal demand with on shore production.

That’s not how the global oil market works. The US is no position to redirect all of its production to meet domestic demand. In the same way, there is no “local discount” for the US consumers of oil on domestically produced crude. It’s a global market and the US will suffer along with everybody else due to shortages and high prices.

I am a tiny, tiny part of this in 2026

By mccalli • Score: 5, Informative Thread
UK. I installed solar on my roof and put a home battery in last month, and am very happy with the results. It took up-front investment of course and payback times vary between 4-7 years depending on the rates for selling energy back to the grid, but I’m fine with that. My first bill has my electricity cost down about 40% - I installed part way through the month so can’t really give consistent figures as yet.

With the solar+home battery, all my domestic electricity usage is easily taken care of. I also took the opportunity to put in a whole home backup, meaning that if there’s a power cut the house carries on. Power cuts aren’t really a big problem in the UK but little micro ones do happen, and I got fed up of resetting the digital clocks and rebooting everything.

The solar+battery doesnt take care of 100% of my usage though, not by a long way. I’ve been driving an EV since 2018. I do around 22,000 miles per year, My solar peaks at around 5kWh and is best used to power the house and add to the house’s battery capacity. I use about 22kWhs on a round-trip commute, and the home battery is 12.5kWh. The typical max I might need then is 34.5kWh a day, and I also need it overnight - solar isn’t going to help me there. My actual pattern is load-shifting: charge both car and home batteries cheaply overnight, use solar+battery through the day on the house and sell the daytime excess to the grid.

On the car alone I have saved around £8-10,000 vs petrol, add in the car maintenance and the savings are even higher. For solar+home battery I don’t yet know, not owned it long enough to be able to give good figures but the usage pattern is looking good. If I’m asked about EVs I rarely make an environmental argument - if you can charge at home, the cost argument is so massively in favour of them that’s it’s barely worth a debate. If you can’t - nuance time and more questions to be asked.

I’m not off fossil just yet - still have gas heating. The heat pump equations are a lot trickier to work out - without load shifting it’s much more expensive, plus how will it average out over winter when I presumably get less solar to recharge the home battery during the day. So heat pump is the next bit of research rather than my automatic next move. For the rest though - just no argument, the renewable/EV route is just better.

Re:Renewables are not replacing coal in China

By AnOnyxMouseCoward • Score: 4, Informative Thread
You didn’t reply to me directly, but… that’s another excerpt:

One potentially critical aspect of this is that China’s emissions actually declined in 2025, which the IEA ascribes to a mixture of industrial changes and the explosive expansion of renewable energy.

You can say China is not serious about pollution, they’re cost-first, but… hey whatever their philosophy, the ars technica article seems to indicate there are changes for the better. They may still use a fuckton of coal, but they’re also investing in renewables at a pace we haven’t seen anyone else do.

Maryland Becomes First State To Pass Bill Banning ‘Surveillance Pricing’

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Denver7:
Maryland is poised to become the first state in the country to ban “surveillance pricing.” The practice refers to companies using a shopper’s personal data, such as browsing history, location, or purchasing behavior, to tailor prices to individual customers. The Protection From Predatory Pricing Act, passed this month and sent to the governor for a signature, would prohibit food retailers and third-party delivery services from using the practice. Violations would be treated as deceptive trade practices under state law, with potential fines and lawsuits.
While Consumer Reports called the move “encouraging,” it warned that the final version contains “loopholes” that don’t fully protect consumers. Some of the exemptions noted in the report include “applying the ban only to the use of personal data to set higher prices without establishing a baseline or standard price; exempting pricing tied to loyalty or membership programs, even if prices are higher; and exempting pricing linked to subscriptions or subscription-based services.”

socialism fails

By retchdog • Score: 4, Funny Thread

looks like Maryland has made its position on the free market clear! i feel bad for Marylanders who will be deprived of this dynamic innovation!

Good

By rsilvergun • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
There is way too much danger of collusion and antitrust violations with surveillance pricing. It’s been a common workaround for companies looking to collude. Instead of getting in a smoky room and agreeing on price fixing you put all your data on a shared platform and use that to do your pricing decisions. The end result is the equivalent to the aforementioned smokey room but on an app so it’s passed off as legal.

Apartment owners did this and it caused rents to shoot up an extra 20 or 30% over what they would have been without it. Several attorney generals pushed back against it but the damage is already done. Also the courts are packed with pro corporate judges so long term it’s probably going to die and we’re going to go back to having these policies in most places.

Usage Data

By JBMcB • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
The company I used to work for data-mined telemetry to find out what product features people actually use. Would that be banned?

Also, a data-mining ban from the government will never come, as they want that data, too.

This needs to die.

By JaredOfEuropa • Score: 3 Thread
“applying the ban only to the use of personal data to set higher prices without establishing a baseline or standard price”.
So you set very high baseline prices, then use personal data to offer varying discounts. That does look like a loophole.

How about “No dynamic prices or discounts based on personal or biometric data are allowed”? Put in an exemption to offer a discount to certain classes (student or vet discounts, discounts for seniors)
In the past dynamic prices (discounts) were used to increase turnover: get new customers in the door with offers, keep them coming back with loyalty programs, and have them buy more with volume discounts. Now, it is used to extract the maximum amount of cash from every customer. It seems that the MBAs who came up with this have fully embraced the first tenet of communism: from each according to their ability.
“How much is this item?”
- “How much do you have?”

Re:Usage Data

By ChatHuant • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

The company I used to work for data-mined telemetry to find out what product features people actually use. Would that be banned?

If linked in any way to the identity of the user then yes, it should be banned. If used for anything beyond finding out what product features people use (for example, selling usage data to insurance or ad companies) then yes, it should be banned. If collected without the user being clearly notified this is happening, and without the user’s explicit opt-in then yes, it should be banned.

Amazon To Invest Up To Another $25 Billion In Anthropic

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Amazon is expanding its Anthropic partnership with a deal to invest up to another $25 billion, while Anthropic commits to spending more than $100 billion on AWS infrastructure over the next decade to power Claude. “Anthropic’s commitment to run its large language models on AWS Trainium for the next decade reflects the progress we’ve made together on custom silicon, as we continue delivering the technology and infrastructure our customers need to build with generative AI,” Amazon CEO Andy Jassy said in a statement. CNBC reports:
Amazon’s investment includes $5 billion into Anthropic now, with up to $20 billion in the future tied to “certain commercial milestones,” according to a release. The initial investment is at Anthropic’s latest valuation of $380 billion. Anthropic said in the release that it will bring nearly 1 gigawatt total of Trainium2 and Trainium3 capacity online by the end of the year.

With all of the major hyperscalers competing to build out AI capacity as quickly as possible, Amazon said in February that it expects to shell out roughly $200 billion this year on capital expenditures, mostly on AI infrastructure.

Re:Oh come on!

By haruchai • Score: 5, Funny Thread

640M ought to be enough for anybody

Re:Round and round

By martin-boundary • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Fairly soon after the oil price goes through the roof, I’d say. Because when there are no customers willing to open their wallets for AI toy products, the illusion of an endless source of revenue as big as the whole economy of the world will come crashing down. Bonus points if anyone prosecutes the cashed up insider traders.

Anthropic vs. MacOS

By gtall • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

According to https://www.theregister.com/20…:

“Yet Anthropic’s Claude Desktop for macOS installs files that affect other vendors’ applications without disclosure, even before those applications have been installed, and authorizes browser extensions without consent.”

If you think about it…

By Pseudonymous Powers • Score: 5, Informative Thread
…EVERYbody is investing UP TO 25 billion dollars in Anthropic. Because “up to” includes zero dollars.

Re:Out of all the AI startups

By clifwlkr • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
I take it you have never actually used the codex model then? It generates better structured and more intelligent code than Claude Opus 4.6, using significantly less tokens. Last year, Cursor was the darling of everyone and going to vibe code its way to the top. This market is far from decided....

iPhone Video Shows ‘Earthset’ From Space

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
NASA astronaut Reid Wiseman posted an out-of-this-world iPhone video on Sunday, showing Earth disappear behind the Moon at 8x zoom. “I could barely see the Moon through the docking hatch window but the iPhone was the perfect size to catch the view,” said Wiseman, noting that this video is “uncropped, uncut with 8x zoom” and “quite comparable to the view of the human eye.” The New York Times says the video marks the first time an “Earthset” has been captured on video.

“We’ve seen our fair share of remarkable images and videos from NASA’s Artemis II mission around the Moon. Some of those were even captured on iPhone,” notes 9to5Mac. “But Reid Wiseman, astronaut and commander for the Artemis II mission, just posted a new video that might take the crown for the most impressive yet.”

Free iPhones rather than Corvettes?

By drnb • Score: 5, Funny Thread
So are astronauts going to get free iPhones rather than free Corvettes? :-)

Compare with Spacex’s Starship

By greytree • Score: 3, Informative Thread
Spacex’s Starship gives us LIVE video of fucking reentry plasma, flaps as they disintegrate with the heat, splashdown.

After a couple of weeks, NASA’s Artemis finds an Iphone video one of the crew took.

Re:How far we have fallen

By necro81 • Score: 5, Informative Thread

The last Moon-missions used Hasselblad cameras with REAL objectives and now this.

Please stop complaining. Most of the awesome photography that happened on this mission was performed with Nikon D5s and Nikon glass. The D5 has been in use on the ISS for a long while, the astronaut corps is familiar with it, it’s proven its reliability in space environments, and has exceptional low-light capabilities.* Plus, Nikon works with NASA to provide custom firmware and related services.

And before you move the goal posts and start whining “but that camera is so old!” - they also brought a more modern Z9 with them. A modified Z9 will be what is used on the lunar surface.

More info: [1], [2], [3]

* The recent Hello World image that was in every media channel on Earth was shot at ISO 51200, because it’s actually capturing the night side of Earth. That is: Weissman took that picture in the dark.

iPhone iPhone iPhone

By Gramie2 • Score: 5, Funny Thread
Looks like that Apple sponsorship deal really paid off!

Re:Compare with Spacex’s Starship

By necro81 • Score: 5, Informative Thread

After a couple of weeks, NASA’s Artemis finds an Iphone video one of the crew took.

Have you been living under a rock? NASA live-streamed practically the entire mission on YouTube and other channels. Pictures taken by the astronauts were posted to NASA’s website on a daily basis, and splashed across every newspaper and media channel on the planet!

Bear in mind that during the Apollo mission, we had to wait for the astronauts to return and have film developed before anyone could see images.

PlayStation To Require Age Verification For Messages and Voice Chat

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
A new email from Sony says that PlayStation will require players to verify their age later this year to keep using communication features like messages and voice chat. Insider-Gaming reports:
The initiative comes from the goal of providing “safe, age-appropriate experiences for players and families while respecting their privacy” and providing “meaningful control over their gaming experiences.” The age-verification process will be implemented globally, and players will need to verify their age to continue using PlayStation communication services, such as messages and voice chat. If the player opts not to verify their age, they can still use other services, such as games, trophies, and the store. Only the communication experience will be affected if you choose not to verify your age. PlayStation didn’t provide a date for when players will need to begin the verification process.

“while respecting their privacy”

By T34L • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

[ ] Doubt

Re:Good.

By sizzlinkitty • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

F the kids… nobody should care about them more than their parents who should already be parenting them correctly. My privacy is more important than your kids though and nobody should be forced to share their ID with companies that will ultimately lose that information in data breaches.

won’t someone think of the children?

By OrangeTide • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

And let’s also think about how we can harvest their parent’s data

Re:Good.

By sit1963nz • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
The world is NOT the USA.

The USA is the worst of things , Greed, Entitlement, Racism, Bigotry, Religion, etc etc etc and you protect the Pedo President…

You have nothing to offer the sane world.

Re:Good.

By test321 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The USA is the worst of things ,

Don’t fall for overblown internet memes. Any big country has many problems, and the USA has a magnifying glass on top blowing its visibility. But if you follow news from European countries, you’ll also find a lot of sad situations. Yet there are many places to choose from in e.g. the EU or the USA (or Brazil etc.), where you can do a daily life without being directly exposed to the major defects of the wider society. If you interact more with your local community and less with social networks, you’ll be fine in most places.

Mobile Phones To Be Banned In Schools In England Under New Plans

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from the Guardian:
A ban on mobile phones in schools in England is to be introduced by the government to ensure that “critical safeguarding legislation” is passed. The government will table an amendment to the children’s wellbeing and schools bill in the House of Lords after the bill was held up by peers on opposition benches. It will make existing guidance on mobile phone bans in schools statutory, a move that ministers have resisted until now.

The government had consistently argued that the vast majority of schools had already banned mobile phones, and that there was no need to add a legal requirement. They finally capitulated, however, describing it as “a pragmatic measure” to get the bill through. […] The bill is regarded by many as the biggest piece of child protection legislation in decades and includes proposals for a compulsory register for children who are not in school, a crackdown on profiteering in children’s social care, and a “single unique identifier” to help agencies track a child’s welfare.

Bold move, but jolly good!

By Morpeth • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Study after study shows kids do better in school, are more engaged, and more social when phones are out of the picture. ‘Social’ media is exactly the opposite, it’s isolating and anxiety inducing for a lot of teens.

I think there’s a lot of adults I know who might be better off too. I definitely have some friends / colleagues who waste so much time on it, and it mostly just seems to make them anxious or irate — but as far as the platforms are considered, who cares as long as they’re ‘engaged’ with it…

Re:In other news

By test321 • Score: 5, Informative Thread

as students can’t call for help.

On their way to and from school, pupils/students have their mobile phones, so there is no change in their ability to call for help on the public street. Inside school, they can call the staff for help.

Also you’re missing that this policy isn’t new. The only change is will become compulsory for the 0.2% primary schools and 10% secondary schools who still hadn’t banned mobile phones.

TFA:

Research from the children’s commissioner for England last year found that 99.8% of primary schools and 90% of secondary schools already had policies in place that limited or restricted the use of mobile phones during the school day.

The policy: https://www.gov.uk/government/…

Anecdotal evidence

By Gramie2 • Score: 5, Informative Thread
The Province of Quebec banned cell phones in schools in January 2024, and teachers (I sometimes work in schools) have told me that they see significant improvement, with fewer distractions and more personal interactions between students.

Re:In other news

By Bu11etmagnet • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

> School violence projected to skyrocket in the United Kingdom as students can’t call for help.

Monthly school shootings are not in fashion in the UK.

Re:DUMB phones

By test321 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I guess that students in the US are asked to park their car in an appropriate parking place and are not allowed to use their car inside a classroom. That’s what UK students are being asked about their phones.

Apple CEO Tim Cook Is Stepping Down

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot
Apple announced that Tim Cook will step down as CEO in September after 15 years in the role, handing the job to hardware chief John Ternus. Longtime Slashdot reader sinij shares the news from MarketWatch:
Cook leaves an impressive legacy after growing the company to a $4 trillion market capitalization from just $300 billion 15 years ago. Over Cook’s 15-year tenure as CEO, Apple’s stock has risen 1,932%, beating the S&P 500’s 504% increase, according to Dow Jones Market Data. That places Apple’s stock as the 38th best-performing member of the index over that period of time.

Cook had big shoes to fill, replacing Apple’s iconic founder, Steve Jobs, as CEO. Cook’s successor, John Ternus, Apple’s senior vice president of hardware engineering, will need to guide Apple’s through uncharted waters as the company navigates its artificial-intelligence transition and supply-chain constraints. Cook will remain at Apple as executive chairman.
“It has been the greatest privilege of my life to be the CEO of Apple and to have been trusted to lead such an extraordinary company. I love Apple with all of my being, and I am so grateful to have had the opportunity to work with a team of such ingenious, innovative, creative, and deeply caring people who have been unwavering in their dedication to enriching the lives of our customers and creating the best products and services in the world,” said Cook.
“John Ternus has the mind of an engineer, the soul of an innovator, and the heart to lead with integrity and with honor. He is a visionary whose contributions to Apple over 25 years are already too numerous to count, and he is without question the right person to lead Apple into the future. I could not be more confident in his abilities and his character, and I look forward to working closely with him on this transition and in my new role as executive chairman.”

As for Ternus’ replacement, the role of Chief Hardware Officer will be awarded to Apple executive Johny Srouji. “Srouji, who most recently served as senior vice president of Hardware Technologies, will assume an expanded role leading Hardware Engineering, which John Ternus most recently oversaw, as well as the hardware technologies organization,” said Apple in a press release.

Re:Probably a good choice.

By fahrbot-bot • Score: 5, Informative Thread

They’ve been so distracted by silliness like …

… bribing — I mean, Gifting — the President with 24k gold trinkets.

Re:Probably a good choice.

By sound+vision • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I’ve heard him asking for weirder stuff now, but there’s probably a gold trinket glued to the front of it. What he seems to crave more than anything now is for you to totally degrade yourself before him.

Re:Let’s see if his replacement will kiss the ring

By sound+vision • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Unfortunately you have people like the head of the FBI, and the Secretary of Defense, who have declined to ignore him, and that makes it hard for everyone else.

Apple sell h/w, chosen by customers due to s/w

By drnb • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Putting a hardware guy in charge of Apple might help the company return to its roots as a hardware-first company.

Apple is a company that sells hardware, chosen by its customer due to software.

I’d say that Apple was a software first company. Don’t misunderstand, Wozniak did some brilliant hardware engineering. And some brilliant software engineering. But it was the software ecosystem of the Apple II that made the company. It was even the Apple II that paid for the Macintosh during all those early years where it failed in the market. And when the Mac did become successful, again, it was largely due to the software ecosystem, The iPhone, it was kind of a niche product until it was opened up to third party developers, and again, the software ecosystem made it such a huge success. Under Jobs 2.0, Apple transitioned from beleaguered Apple to highly profitable Apple. This was due, in a large part to transitioning from 1980’ish Classic MacOS to NeXTSTEP-based (Unix based) MacOS X (now macOS). Did Apple get a big boost from transitioning from PowerPC to Intel CPUs, absolutely. But it wasn’t really the hardware, it was about software. It was about Windows. They removed the “Windows or Mac OS” question, now you could have both software ecosystems (Windows and Mac) on the same hardware, running natively. Yes, the hardware enabled that, but from the buyer perspective it was about the software ecosystems.

Its software that makes people choose iPhone over Android.

Its software that makes people choose Mac over PC.

Cook got Apple’s logistics straightened out. Ternus will hopefully get the engineering straightened out. He’s an engineer, and a hardware engineer should understand software well enough to manage and lead Apple. A company that sells hardware, that is chosen by customers due to software.

Re:Apple sell h/w, chosen by customers due to s/w

By ceoyoyo • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Apple seems to understand that software makes hardware run and vice versa. To the vast majority of people the distinction is not just academic but nerdy academic.

They are not a hardware or a software company. They make computers in a few different shapes and sizes. Computers that you don’t have to go buying a bunch of other bits so they actually do something.