Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Do Data Centers Have a Smaller Effect on Electricity Prices Than We Think?
  2. Norwegians Release FOSS GNOME Software for Music Recording, Internet Radio, and Cameras
  3. Python’s CVEs Triple. Anthropic Funds a New Security Developer
  4. Aaron Swartz Would’ve Been 40 Today. His ‘Legacy Lives On’ Says FSF
  5. NASA Announces It’s Looking for New Astronauts
  6. Scifi Magazine ‘Starlog’ Relaunches, and Back Issues Return to Internet Archive
  7. AlpineBSD Announced - an AI-free FOSS OS
  8. Microsoft Removes PC-to-PC Migration from Windows 11, Points Users to OneDrive-Based Backup
  9. Data Centers are Being Powered By Giant Gas Plants, Possibly Increasing Carbon Pollution for Decades
  10. Is Mandating AI Use in the Workplace Backfiring?
  11. Scientists Find Rare Meteorite From Mars With Signs of Ancient Water
  12. A Third Major US Offshore Wind Farm Is Now Fully Operational
  13. AlmaLinux Shows Advantages of ABI Compatibility After RHEL Restricted Source Code Access
  14. China’s Top Spy Agency Recruited Woman Who Targeted Jensen Huang
  15. Cryosphere Faces Permanent Damage When World Overshoots 1.5C, Scientists Warn

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Do Data Centers Have a Smaller Effect on Electricity Prices Than We Think?

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
“According to a new study by researchers at Harvard University and the University of Pennsylvania, data centers are probably having only a small effect on residential electricity prices,” reports the Washington Post.

“The researchers calculated that these operations were responsible for just 4% of the utility rate increases over the last five years…”
There are certainly some areas — like in Pennsylvania, Virginia, Ohio and other states covered by grid operator PJM — where data centers have skyrocketed demand, pushing some costs onto residential customers. But multiple studies by different researchers and organizations have failed to find a strong connection between data centers and the overall trajectory of U.S. electricity prices in recent years. Another analysis earlier this year by researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology found that, between 2010 and 2024, data centers increased average electricity prices for residential customers by just 2.1%. Last year, research from the Brattle Group and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory found that data centers were actually decreasing costs in certain regions. And another study by the Electric Power Research Institute found that a doubling of data center capacity between 2019 and 2024 resulted in a 4 percent drop in home electricity prices…

The new Harvard and Penn study found a slightly higher impact on industrial electricity prices — the price paid by manufacturers and large facilities. For those customers, data centers were responsible for 15% of the price increase between 2020 and 2025. But for ordinary Americans… the changes simply were not substantial [according to Wharton School professor Serguei Netessine, one of the study’s authors]. “So far we have no evidence that data centers increase prices all that much,” Netessine said. Instead, he said, prices are rising due to more quotidian factors: rising gas prices, an aging electricity grid, and wildfires and hurricanes requiring improvements to the grid and recovery after disaster…

If the number of data centers continue to boom, experts say, residential prices could be affected more down the line. Data center electricity demand is expected to increase steeply over the next few years, requiring new power generation — wind, solar or natural gas — to be put onto the grid. And residents have issues with data centers that go beyond the price of electricity. The new developments have been singled out for loud noise, polluting power generation, and for disturbing residential neighborhoods and natural landscapes. According to the Pew Research Center, more than half of Americans say that data centers are mostly bad for the environment. Others feel that the AI race — which could ultimately leave many Americans out of work — is being forced upon them.

“I think generally what we’re seeing is a broader range of reasons the public has opposed data centers,” [said Ryan Hledik, principal at the Brattle Group]. “Concern about AI leading to loss of jobs — all of that is getting packaged together.”

Norwegians Release FOSS GNOME Software for Music Recording, Internet Radio, and Cameras

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
ole (Slashdot reader #19,909) writes in about his free, Norwegian open-source music recording studio for GNOME called GarageJam, which he says allows musicians to compose, record, and share original music seamlessly on the Internet.
The latest release, GarageJam 8.0.1, is available in C and Python. It records audio immediately to Ogg Vorbis (.ogg) files in the current working directory and lets you edit metadata in .gjxml XML files from a GTK/GNOME wizard — all built on the Gingerblue Recording Studio API.
Ole shares links to its IETF GarageJam XML draft and GitHub repositories, and there’s also GarageJam Studio, “a commercial music and audio recording app for the World Wide Web written by Aamot Innovation from Norway.”.

ole is also spreading the word about GNOME Media, which “puts internet radio and your photographs on one OpenStreetMap… built from GNOME Radio 85.0.1.”
Click a station on the map to listen. Cities with several stations show a count and a menu. Open a folder of pictures or import from a camera. Photos with a GPS position in their EXIF data appear on the map. Double-click a thumbnail to open it. The search box filters the station list and the map together.
ole also announces:

Fjords guitars and Linux

By Mirnotoriety • • Score: 3 • Thread
Only in open source can one release a music studio, an internet radio map, camera software and an educational Linux distribution and call it a Sunday afternoon’s work. Joking aside, it’s great to see people building useful, quirky software instead of another subscription-based cloud service. More of this, please!

Python’s CVEs Triple. Anthropic Funds a New Security Developer

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
In the last year CVEs have increased 3x for Python and its package manager Pip, according to Python’s security developer in residence Seth Larson. “And the amount of malware published and removed from the Python Package Index (PyPI) is up 60%.” Securing Python’s ecosystem is getting more complex, he writes, especially given “the evolving role of AI in both security risks and security response.”

Their response includes bringing on a new Security Developer “to address the increasingly demanding scale of security response for the Python ecosystem.”
Providing prompt security response services and innovating to prevent future threats… is more difficult now than ever before… [Security developer Brett Smith] will help us keep pace with critical ongoing work such as vulnerability remediation, providing vulnerability data as a CVE Numbering Authority, and removing malware from PyPI. He’ll also give the team bandwidth for new projects such as scaling PyPI’s autonomous quarantine program to reduce manual effort on malware remediation and streamlining processes for the PSRT to handle the new vulnerability report volume.
The role was made possible by an "ecosystem security” grant from Anthropic. And having the new security developer “will both build capacity for security work the PSF already does and enable new, proactive work,” concludes Python’s security developer in residence. (He discussed Python’s security challenges in a June presentation with Python security engineer Mike Fiedler> .)

In June, Curl’s Daniel Strenberg reported Curl’s CVEs have also tripled.

Aaron Swartz Would’ve Been 40 Today. His ‘Legacy Lives On’ Says FSF

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
“Aaron Swartz would have turned forty this year,” writes FSF deputy director Sean O’Brien. “November 8 is Aaron Swartz Day, when we remember a pioneer of free software and information sharing whose contributions helped shape the modern internet.”

The Internet Archive will host a hackathon Sunday in San Francisco celebrating Aaron’s Swartz’s life “and the projects he worked on, many of which are still going strong today,” including SecureDrop, OpenLibrary, and Creative Commons. “We are also spreading the word about projects he inspired,” including OnionPress and the EFF’s Atlas of Surveillancedocumenting police tech use through open source research, now a collaborative effort with volunteers, the University of Nevada, Reno, and the Reynolds School of Journalism. The event is also supported by Free Law Project, and organizers are asking attendees to “bring a color print out of your favorite photos of Aaron for a huge collaborative collage.”

From the Internet Archive’s blog:
Aaron was also a co-founder of Creative Commons, where he worked with Lisa Rein developing the RSS-enhanced HTML code that sits behind Creative Commons licenses, much of which is still in use today. The “Quantifying the Commons” project was designed to help measure open-licensed and public-domain works worldwide, and is one of the projects participants can work on. Aaron loved Tor and created tools such as "Tor2web" (with Virgil Griffith) to help more people publish Tor-accessible websites. Onion Press is a Tor-based publishing system designed for decentralized, censorship-resistant publishing, and participants can work on the code base…

We also encourage you to have a hackathon in your own town using our materials — or materials of your own. Please let us know if you plan to do this (although it’s not required!). If you do let us know, we can include you on our website and help you spread the word about your event. So far, there is an event in Portland sponsored by Portland Civic Lab where they will be screening The Internet’s Own Boy and celebrating Aaron’s life.
“EFF was proud to call Aaron a friend and ally,” the digital rights organization posted this week. And the FSF’s deputy director writes “It is particularly striking that some of the world’s largest companies now rely on technology Swartz helped to develop.”
One of Swartz’s most important technical contributions was his collaboration with John Gruber on Markdown, the simple text formatting system introduced in 2004. Markdown allows users to create structured documents using ordinary text, without requiring proprietary software. More than twenty years later, Markdown has become one of the most popular formats for documentation and publishing, and is widely used in community websites such as forums and wikis. This is not a minor contribution. Companies developing LLMs use Markdown extensively in their products and development tools. OpenAI, for example, recommends Markdown for organizing instructions and communicating structure to its ChatGPT models… Swartz also developed web.py, a public domain framework for building Python applications, and contributed to RSS 1.0, a public internet standard for distributing news and other information between websites.
Swartz developed web.py while rewriting the software running Reddit after Reddit acquired Swartz’s company Infogami.

Reddit recently licensed its content to AI companies, and the FSF’s deputy director notes “the enormous scale of the alleged ‘piracy’ by giant technology corporations” while Aaron himself had “faced criminal prosecution for downloading academic research that he wanted to distribute with no monetary gain.”
In 2011, federal prosecutors charged Swartz with computer fraud and related offenses after he downloaded millions of academic articles from the JSTOR collection through MIT’s university network… Although he was not charged with copyright infringement, he faced aggressive federal prosecution and the possibility of decades in prison before he tragically died by suicide in January 2013, at just twenty-six years old…

Swartz helped build tools that made the internet more useful and accessible, and his contributions continue to shape a world he never lived to see. On Aaron Swartz Day, we should remember his achievements and the access-to-knowledge principles that guided them. The companies benefiting from his legacy should respect those same principles by giving users true freedom and control, rather than imposing more restrictions on us all.

You know what I think

By FudRucker • • Score: 3 • Thread
He was murdered by the government

Re: You know what I think

By commodore73 • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
Trump would call him a loser.

Re: You know what I think

By topham • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread

He tried to off himself before he was ever threatened with prison.

He was mentally unstable and instead of accepting that he needed help them blame the government.

He was used by the people wanting to liberate data, and he died for it.

Duality of Man and the System

By Himmy32 • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

Aaron did both good and bad things.

Belief that we should have open access to scientific data that’s largely sponsored by public funds is a noble idea. And expressing it by breaking into network closets and downloading so fast that the system breaks is a bad idea.

Likewise there is undoubtedly injustice in a system that throws 35 years in a federal prison at one activist while Facebook can torrent 100’s of terrabytes of journals, books, and media without consequence and the judge finds it as mostly fair use.

Too much of the situation seemed like it was the script to a campy 1990’s film with characters shouting Hack the Planet. But in real life the characters aren’t one dimensional. People both making him out to be either the hero or the villain are living in that fantasy world, where instead he was the standard tragically flawed human being.

NASA Announces It’s Looking for New Astronauts

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Saturday NASA officials announced it’s accepting applications for a new astronaut class, reports the Associated Press:
With only 32 active astronauts, the space agency needs more recruits as it looks to expand humanity’s presence beyond low-Earth orbit as quickly as possible… “We have far more work than we have astronauts,” Artemis III commander Randy Bresnik told The Associated Press on Saturday. Aspiring astronauts have between now and Dec. 3 to submit their applications… [They’ll begin their training by early 2028]. By then “we’re going to have people on the moon — so don’t delay,” Bresnik urged potential candidates.

Bresnik and his three crewmates will blast into orbit next summer to practice docking their capsule with a pair of lunar landers, one built by Elon Musk’s SpaceX and the other by Jeff Bezos’ Blue Origin. Their mission will stick close to Earth — no lunar flyby — and serve as a dress rehearsal for the following year’s Artemis IV mission that will attempt to land two astronauts near the lunar south pole. The moon base will materialize as more rovers, robots, structures and power grids are launched.
The article notes NASA’s last call for new astronauts was two years ago, and “More than 8,000 applied, with 10 making the final cut in September 2025.”

If it’s a Boeing

By ruddk • • Score: 3 • Thread

I ain’t going

Reminds me…

By commodore73 • • Score: 3 • Thread
I was in 8th grade during the challenger disaster. The going joke was that NASA stood for “need another seven astronauts.”

Scifi Magazine ‘Starlog’ Relaunches, and Back Issues Return to Internet Archive

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Slashdot reader sandbagger brings news about the classic science ficdtion magazine Starlog. It’s 33-year run from 1976 to 2009 is now available on the Internet Archive.

And 17 years after publishing its final issue, Starlog is relaunching, publishing one issue a year starting November 13, according to The Hollywood Reporter:
The magazine launched in 1976 and gained a fanbase for being one of the few places to get reliable news and interviews about geek culture. It launched with a cover focusing on Star Trek, one of its key areas of expertise, but the magazine’s editors and writers also pioneered coverage of Star Wars. (The new issue chronicles some of the rumors it put out a year before the movie opened). In all, Starlog published 374 issues and more than 25,000 pages… In addition to the film and TV-focused features Starlog was known for, the new Starlog will also delve into futurism, as the cover from Gabriel Yeganyan highlights. The opening story of issue No. 1 looks at the viability of humans farming crops on planets outside of Earth, for example… The revival was announced earlier this year, and includes a podcast hosted by Jordan Hoffman, a veteran journalist who has contributed to The Hollywood Reporter.

Archive call

By Anonymous Coward • • Score: 3, Informative • Thread

Everyone and anyone interested in their episodes, or data preservation in general, should go download the full collection immediately!

The company who purchased the IP rights during their bankruptcy, Fangoria Holdings, still believes they own part of the IP rights.
This is the company that tried (and largely succeeded) to have all available copies destroyed, and are the reason they were removed from the internet archive.

Please don’t let them do it again!

AlpineBSD Announced - an AI-free FOSS OS

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Lproven (Slashdot reader #6,030) shares his article about a new OS in the BSD family “combining NetBSD’s kernel and libc with a port of the Alpine Linux userland” — and promising it won’t use AI-generated code:
AlpineBSD is so new that it barely exists yet. There are no installation media available, though it’s possible to manually bootstrap an installation. What AlpineBSD does already have is an AI policy, and the plan is to avoid “the output of generative AI models (e.g. LLMs)" as far as possible:

“Any software whose code, documentation, binaries, or other assets include, in any part, the output of a generative AI tool such as an LLM, is considered ‘tainted’ for our purposes....”

Back in 2024, the NetBSD project made its position on AI plain. Its commit guidelines say that “code generated by a Large Language Model […] is presumed to be tainted code....”

AlpineBSD’s ports repository and source code are hosted on Sourcehut, under the account of sircmpwn, better known as Drew DeVault… We will follow AlpineBSD with interest. There’s strong appeal in the plan of combining perhaps the best-known, longest-established AI-free Unix-like kernel with the user-facing parts of pretty much the smallest and cleanest Linux distro there is. The AI advocates often warn LLM skeptics that they risk being left behind. Well, here’s an OS for those who don’t want to surf the AI wave.
The article does acknowledge difficulty installing software using the pkgin package manager (an optional extra), explaining that since 1993 the NetBSD community has had “its own ideas about what is normal… Some folks on the mailing list told us that they never use binary packages anyway — they compile what they need from source code.”

Reminds me of SQLite’s stance

By Sebby • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

This stance reminds me a bit of SQLite’s stance on contributions:

SQLite is open-source but it is not open-contribution. All the code in SQLite is written by a small team of experts. The project does not accept “pull requests” or patches from anonymous passers-by on the internet

The main reason in their case is that they want to maintain the code as pure public domain, so don’t want it “tainted” by contributions of unknown origin that might later cause issues if used.

Footgun…

By x0ra • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Back in 2024, the NetBSD project made its position on AI plain. Its commit guidelines say that “code generated by a Large Language Model […] is presumed to be tainted code....

That’s a hell of a way to dig your own grave… not that NetBSD was relevant in any way…

Re:Reminds me of SQLite’s stance

By arglebargle_xiv • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
I contribute to a project with a similar policy, and it’s not because we’re worried about PRs sapping and impurifying our precious bodily fluids but because the code base does something that’s quite difficult to understand for most people and so we analyse the issue in a code change request and then rewrite it in the appropriate way. I was at a talk by the SQLite devs years ago and the said that was why they were a small team, you need a huge amount of knowledge of low-level database internals just to begin to work with SQLite, so they don’t actively exclude people but there’s just naturally a very small number of people able to work on the code.

Re:AI works, really well

By ArmoredDragon • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread

I’ve been setting up agents for scanning for security hole at work. It’s pretty good, and as someone pointed out recently AI is making us pay back 40 years of technical debt. It’s also quite good at finding security holes in its own code. But also it still has a tendency to produce slop and vastly overengineer solutions to simple problems.

I’ve found that if you don’t use weakly typed, anti-pattern riddled languages like C++ or python, it’s a lot less sloppy. C++ is like trying to build a 6502 out of high-voltage uninsulated wires anyway, and no longer has any compelling use case other than you’ve been told to maintain code somebody originally started writing 20 years ago, so it’s not as if anybody’s going to use that crap for anything new unless they just plain suck as a developer. Python still has some compelling use cases, such as quick logic glue, especially for people just learning to code and haven’t yet discovered much of the patterns they thought were useful were actually footguns. Either way, these languages are prone to slop with or without AI.

Re:Reminds me of SQLite’s stance

By test321 • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

All the big actors are using AI in their code. Who’s left to sue on that line? The code of the Linux kernel is authored by Intel, AMD, Google, Meta, IBM, NVIDIA, Oracle, HP, Samsung, Huawei, NXP semiconductors, Realtek, Renesas ( https://lwn.net/Articles/11002… ). Who would fight their combined legal budget?

Microsoft Removes PC-to-PC Migration from Windows 11, Points Users to OneDrive-Based Backup

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Windows 11 offered a PC-to-PC Migration feature that “moved files and settings directly between two PCs over Wi-Fi or Ethernet,” reports Ghacks. But according to an updated Microsoft support page, the tool is no longer available.

“Microsoft’s support documentation now redirects users to Windows Backup, a tool that relies on OneDrive cloud storage instead of a direct connection between two computers…”
Windows Backup works differently. It requires a personal Microsoft account and backs up supported folders (Desktop, Documents, Pictures, Videos and Music) to OneDrive. Free OneDrive accounts include only 5GB of storage, and Microsoft’s own promotional screenshot for Windows Backup shows 4.5GB of that allowance already in use. Years of photos, documents and downloads can exceed the free tier quickly.

Windows Backup does carry some extras. It can remember installed apps, Wi-Fi networks, passwords and some settings to speed up setup on a new device. Apps still have to be reinstalled, and supported files are restored from the cloud.
Thanks to Slashdot reader joshuark for sharing the article.

Time to squeeze platform users trapped again

By atrimtab • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Ah, more “permanent rent seeking” by a tech company!

Just like the Frontier AI play… Pay us forever while we listen in and steal your IP.

No Thanks!

Microsoft, why should anyone use and pay forever your invariably slower online backup service until their systems die versus what they can do locally?

Re:Time to squeeze platform users trapped again

By thegarbz • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

Two words, asshole; Fuck. You.

No Sam Altman you can’t have my RAM and don’t post AC we can tell it’s you.

You can never

By Vinegar Joe • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

hate Microsoft enough.

Re: It’s simpler than that,

By angryman77 • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread
I usually just do this manually. I plug the old computer directly into the new one, set the IPs manually, login to the old machine using the admin’s credential, and start copying as quickly as the HDDs/SSDs can handle.

This takes a bit with drive sizes these days using the gigabit network adapters you usually see on laptops, if they have a network port at all, but I’ve got a couple 10gbit network adapters with usb-c connectors for newer machines.

Re:It’s simpler than that,

By martin-boundary • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Why does Linux need this? It’s not trying to tie you to a single hardware configuration like Windows(*).

With Linux you are completely free to take your old HD and just stick it into your new shiny PC, and everything will just work. Personally though, I use a NAS. My data is accessible from any one of my many PCs over the home network. It’s super convenient, and if I need a bigger disk I just buy that one component and add it to the NAS. No need to copy anything.

(*) so they can gouge your for an extra license if you ever decide to replace or upgrade some components.

Data Centers are Being Powered By Giant Gas Plants, Possibly Increasing Carbon Pollution for Decades

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Rather than racing toward their net-zero targets, Amazon and other AI/cloud computing companies “are driving emissions sharply higher,” reports the Washington Post:
To support their data centers, tech firms are driving construction of a new generation of supersized, gas-fired power plants that could lock in hundreds of millions of tons of climate pollution for decades to come, according to corporate disclosures and an analysis conducted for The Post by a researcher at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. Industry estimates show these projects have put the tech sector on course to grow from a modest driver of industrial carbon pollution into one of the world’s biggest emitters of greenhouse gases. Some anticipate that its share of global carbon emissions will increase as much as fivefold from 2020 to 2030. That would leave the tech industry churning out more than half the climate pollution created by global aviation or shipping — sectors long associated with driving warming…

Already, Amazon’s carbon footprint reached 80.85 million metric tons last year — 58% larger than when [Amazon CEO Jeff] Bezos pledged to shrink it. The company has veered far from the path laid out in the Paris agreement, which would have emissions falling steeply by now and dropping to 43% below 2019 levels by 2030. The tech companies say in corporate disclosures and public statements that they remain committed to their net zero targets, and they suggest the emissions surge is temporary — to be mitigated down the road, when new energy technologies enable the data centers to run cleaner and more efficiently. They also stress that they continue to invest in clean energy and rank as some of the world’s biggest consumers of it. With some complicated accounting maneuvers and carbon credit purchases, their solar, wind and geothermal installations partly cancel out their gas emissions, according to corporate disclosures.
A June report from international insurance/asset management Allianz found the world’s data center emissions are on track to double to 643 million tons of CO2 annually between 2020 and 2030, the article points out. And they cite American data centers contributing to the problem:

Re:We decided we don’t want nuclear

By thegarbz • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

So here we are.

Do you think Amazon is going to wait 20 years to start their datacentre? WTF is wrong with you. These guys can’t even wait for conventional powerplants to be built.

No one of the “we” decided anything in this case. We have no deciding power. Governments don’t even seem to have deciding power where. Amazon decided, unilaterally, to do whatever is fastest, and nuclear power is the exact opposite of that.

Even the biggest of nuclear proponents would have to recognise how dumb your comment is in this context.

Re:“possibly” - WTAF?

By ClickOnThis • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

Look at TFS again.

“tech firms are driving construction of a new generation of supersized, gas-fired power plants that could lock in hundreds of millions of tons of climate pollution for decades to come […] these projects have put the tech sector on course to grow from a modest driver of industrial carbon pollution into one of the world’s biggest emitters of greenhouse gases. Some anticipate that its share of global carbon emissions will increase as much as fivefold from 2020 to 2030. That would leave the tech industry churning out more than half the climate pollution created by global aviation or shipping"

You claim it’s “easily refuted” that such large-scale construction of gas-fired power plants will affect carbon concentration in the atmosphere. Please feel free to do so.

Oh and while you’re at it, please share your intel on the source of funding for the article being “coal-powered Chinese monies.”

Re:“Possibly”

By SoftwareArtist • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

Solar or wind farms, which pollute just as much if not more due to the production pipeline to make those machines?

Is someone paying you to post these ridiculous lies? The energy payback period for modern solar panels is about one year. That’s how long it takes for them to produce as much energy as was used in manufacturing them. Everything after that is free and totally non-polluting.

Another measure is how much CO2 is released for each unit of energy produced. From the same article, the numbers are 41 grams of CO2 per kWh for rooftop solar, 490 g/kWh for gas, and 820 g/kWh for coal.

Re:“Possibly”

By ceoyoyo • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

Solar or wind farms, which pollute just as much if not more due to the production pipeline to make those machines?

It’s funny the things you can claim when you’re allergic to numbers, hey? The typical CO2 payback time for a wind project in Wyoming is six months or less on an operational life of 20 to 30 years. Solar seems to be a bit longer but still under a year.

Re:We decided we don’t want nuclear

By Guspaz • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

The latest one is Vogtle’s units 3 and 4, which are Westinghouse AP1000 units, which cost $36.8 billion USD for around 2.2 gigawatts of capacity.

However, recent and upcoming Canadian plants are relevant, because the US and Canada operate a shared electrical grid (excepting Quebec and Texas, and Quebec still has connections to the US and Canada). OPG is currently building GE Vernova Hitachi Nuclear Canada (what a mouthfull) BWRX-300 SMR reactors, with four of them expected to provide 1.2 gigawatts of capacity for $20.9 billion CAD (or $14.8 billion USD), and if we were to predict future costs by assuming future reactors cost the same as reactors 2-4 (as serial production) rather than reactor 1 (the first ever of its type), a similar project, four reactors plus shared infrastructure, would cost $19.2 billion CAD (or $13.6 billion USD). That is roughly two thirds the cost of the latest US reactor, per gigawatt.

Of course, the Darlington project is still fairly early on, and it’s possible that costs will be over budget. However OPG does have a good track record in this regard, they recently completed a $12.8 billion nuclear refurbishment project that completed $150 million under budget and four months ahead of schedule.

Is Mandating AI Use in the Workplace Backfiring?

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Some workplaces are holding mandatory AI training sessions, while others “are requiring employees to use a specific number of tokens,” reports the Washington Post, “or log a certain amount of time on AI platforms.”

The article’s headline? “Why mandating AI use in the workplace can backfire.”
[A] lot of employers are going about it the wrong way, said Arvind Karunakaran, an assistant professor of management science and engineering at Stanford University. “You can consume a lot of tokens without creating a lot of value,” Karunakaran said....

The adoption of AI is happening faster than the adoption of the internet did, according to a new report from Stanford’s Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence. And many users report that AI tools have really helped — whether saving time and costs or increasing innovation. The same report, though, found that one-third of organizations surveyed expected AI-related staff reductions in the coming year. Especially in that context, simply mandating usage won’t spark excitement about the technology, Karunakaran said, and neither will insisting that employees use AI to cut turnaround times and ramp up productivity. “People start asking questions like ‘What am I as an employee getting out of it?’" he said.

The report he co-authored found that in the short-term, mandating AI tools may ramp up productivity. But in the long-to-medium term, employees tend to feel devalued and disengaged. From there, people find ways to mindlessly check the box.

When employers present these tools and their use as an opportunity for employees to expand their skills and grow their careers, people are much likelier to use them, Karunakaran said. He suggests that rather than requiring employees use a specific number of tokens, companies should encourage workers to experiment and share their own use cases and success stories. Most workplaces are still shutting employees out of the conversation. More than half of employees said they have less of a say than they’d want on adopting new tech at work, according to a report from Gallup and Jobs for the Future, a work and education nonprofit.
Any Slashdot readers want to share your own stories on how AI was introduced at your workplace?

“present as an opportunity”

By ffkom • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

When employers present these tools and their use as an opportunity for employees to expand their skills and grow their careers…

… those employers would just be lying, and many employees would see through this.

There is little “skill” in asking some AI agent to do something, and even if some employee meticulously formulates his prompts to optimize the effective use of the AI, this will go unnoticed by his supervisors, while at the same time a lot of general thinking skills shrink among the entirety of the population due to the outsourcing of thinking to AIs. The only growth their careers will see is a growth in free time due to unemployment or a growth in unpleasant physical work at minimum wage for those filling that gap until the robots get good enough also in physical work.

A waste of time

By uncoveror • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread
I work in IT Support at a federal agency. They have crammed IT into our ticketing system which is a tweaked version of ServiceNow. Its search tool drifts off topic faster than a conventional search engine, and if we let it write the conclusion section of our tickets, we have to do them over because they do not reflect the work that was done in order at all. AI complicates simple tasks and wastes time. That is the opposite of what computers are for.

Re:Working as intended

By ffkom • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Humans invented machines to do their work so they would have more free time.

Yes, and that is a good thing as long as humans own the machines that do their work. This time, however, humans do not own the machines that do their work, and their unemployment is a problem, because the machine owners have no reason to keep the no longer needed humans around (or even alive).

Just the Hawthorne Effect?

By SoftwareArtist • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread

The report he co-authored found that in the short-term, mandating AI tools may ramp up productivity.

The Hawthorne Effect is based on a series of experiments in the 1920s and 30s. They tried varying lots of aspects of a work environment to see how it affected productivity, like lighting levels, break schedules, and whether workers were given snacks. They found that just about any change led to an increase in productivity, but only for a short time. Then it went back to where it started. The particular change didn’t really matter, only that you changed something, and that people knew they were being studied.

This report is likely something similar. If you make people work differently, for a short time they become more engaged. They may also be focused on proving to their manager they can use the new technology. But it doesn’t last. Productivity drops again. It’s a mistake to assume the effect had anything to do with the particular change you made.

stupid metrics

By bmajik • • Score: 3 • Thread

The only thing worse than not having metrics… … is having metrics.

Big companies are almost always stupid.

Organizations measure what is easy for them to measure, not what actually matters. The drift between what matters and what gets measured always produces dumb behaviors.

Measuring token usage is perhaps a proxy for “is this person trying to use AI?”. That question is only interesting if you are quite confident that at some point, your staff will be able to grow the business value they produce as a result of using AI.

What you actually should measure is business value delivered. Companies are bad at that (Because its difficult), So instead they Measure what is easy to measure, and they don’t test the assumption that AI helps staff deliver more BV.

At my small software company, having developers use Claude is delivering tremendous BV. We are getting higher quality PRs, code reviews, and built software, and we are getting it faster. We are getting MUCH faster bug investigations. Overall time to fix is down. We are shipping faster and we are paying down technical debt.

(we may be accumulating new technical debt we don’t see yet. time will tell)

Scientists Find Rare Meteorite From Mars With Signs of Ancient Water

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
“I didn’t think a rock like this existed on Earth,” a geologist at the Lunar and Planetary Institute in Texas told the Washington Post. It looks like a polished rock, dark brown with a clay-colored stripe — but it’s actually one of the oldest Mars meteorites ever found, blasted by an impact from the surface of Mars billions of years ago:
Technically speaking it’s a collection of eight rock fragments, the largest of which is about the size of a fist. Nearly two pounds of the meteorite was discovered in the Sahara in Mali in 2022, and most is now held by a museum in Maine. Within two years, an initial examination determined the meteorite hailed from Mars; scientists are now finally digging deeper, with stunning results.
It offers records of “interactions of water and rock and maybe even an imprint of the Martian atmosphere as it was losing water,” says Lee Saper, co-author of a new paper recently published in Science. “It was only after we started looking closely that we realized this meteorite is really unique,” said Yang Liu of NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Southern California, the lead author of a new paper published in Science. “One of the paper’s reviewers called it a Rosetta Stone for Mars.”

Its mix of minerals “tells a story about how the planet’s crust formed from cooling magma before it was eventually altered by subsurface water,” NASA’s JPL says in an announcement. The Washington Post reports:
The story begins 4.1 billion years ago, when crystals of a mineral called zircon probably solidified out of molten magma on Mars. “That was a game changer,” [said Yang Liu, a planetary scientist at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in California], since scientists can date zircon very precisely, and it has been rare in other Mars meteorites. The date immediately put the Teghaza meteorite on special footing, alongside only two other Mars rocks known to have formed by 4 billion years ago…

Perhaps most intriguingly, the researchers also saw signs that the rock had been exposed to water during its evolution, a find detailed in work published this summer in Science Advances.

A Third Major US Offshore Wind Farm Is Now Fully Operational

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Despite the Trump administration’s efforts to halt development on a $6.2 billion wind farm, it’s now “completely up and running,” reports the nonprofit energy news site Canary Media, delivering enough electricity to power the equivalent over 350,000 homes:
On Thursday, the Danish energy giant Ørsted said its 704-megawatt wind farm near Connecticut and Rhode Island began “generating up to its full capacity” in October. Revolution Wind began producing smaller amounts of power in the spring, and the company installed the last of 65 turbines in September. The project is the third U.S. utility-scale offshore wind farm to reach full commercial operations, after South Fork Wind near New York and Vineyard Wind near Massachusetts.
Before the start of Trump’s second term, BloombergNEF projected America would build 39 gigawatts of offshore wind by 2035 the article points out, but “Now, it expects just 5.9 GW to come online — an amount that reflects the handful of projects that were already completed or under construction at the start of last year.”
Despite the diminished pipeline, the carbon-free energy source is still expected to help keep household utility bills in check across the U.S. Northeast, experts say. Revolution Wind and the country’s other completed projects have already played a key role in reducing grid stress during extreme weather events this year…

Ørsted hit its power milestone despite being forced to halt construction twice last year. In August 2025, the Interior Department issued a stop-work order for Revolution Wind, due to unspecified national security threats. That order was tossed out by a federal judge one month later. But in late December, the administration issued new stop-work orders to all five offshore wind projects then under construction. Judges struck those orders down one by one — but not before developers had lost huge sums of money and nearly missed key project deadlines…

Meanwhile, Ørsted said it’s making progress on another offshore wind development, Sunrise Wind. The developer on Thursday said it has finished installing all of the wind-turbine foundations for the 924-MW project off the coast of Long Island, New York. That installation is expected to be fully operational in the second half of next year.

Now witness the power

By jfdavis668 • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread
of this fully armed and operational wind farm!

Funny timing on that one

By gweihir • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

A pity they cannot use the current US admin’s production of hot air to supercharge these wind farms. Might produce even more energy that way.

Re:This would be terrible news

By gweihir • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

Actually offshore wind is not a problem for birds. This has been studied carefully: Most birds avoid the rotor radius fully, the rest does not get hit. A research project running over two years did not find a single hit on a bird: https://group.vattenfall.com/p…

This is different for onshore wind and buildings (!).

Obviously that offshore wind is dangerous to birds is an often repeadet lie by those that see clean energy as a threat…

Re:Now witness the power

By SoftwareArtist • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Trump is literally trying to destroy the world, opposing anything that could slow down climate change.

When fictional supervillains try to destroy the world, I used to think that was silly. Why would they want to destroy the world? They hurt themselves along with everyone else. Turns out those fictions are more realistic than I thought. There really are people trying to destroy the world without any good reason. His enemies want to prevent the world from being destroyed, and he opposes anything they support. That’s all the reason he needs.

Insane world.

Re:COOL!!!

By SoftwareArtist • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Basically, we’d need to build a landmass the size of the US, and cover it in Chinese solar panels and wind turbines

You’re off by a few orders of magnitude. To supply 100% of the world’s electricity, you would need to cover 0.3% of its land area with solar panels. Considering that urban areas cover 2% of the US, it could probably cover most of its electricity just with solar panels on existing roofs and parking lots.

Of course, the story you’re responding to is about offshore wind, which takes up no land at all. And onshore wind can easily share land with other uses like agriculture. Finding enough land for renewable energy is really not a problem.

AlmaLinux Shows Advantages of ABI Compatibility After RHEL Restricted Source Code Access

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
“AlmaLinux OS charted a new path in 2023 when Red Hat restricted source code access to Red Hat Enterprise Linux,” remembers Linux Magazine. “Rather than pursue 1:1 compatibility with RHEL like other Enterprise Linux alternatives, the AlmaLinux OS Foundation chose application binary interface (ABI) compatibility, which guarantees that applications and kernel modules that work on RHEL will work on AlmaLinux OS.”
No longer constrained by the 1:1 promise, AlmaLinux can offer new features, or add back deprecated ones, while still remaining a stable, drop-in replacement for RHEL… The release of AlmaLinux OS 10.2 in May 2026 reveals just how far AlmaLinux has come....

When RHEL 10 increased the x86-64-v2 architecture baseline to x86-64-v3, many older server platforms (and some new ones) were left in the lurch. These older servers couldn’t support the modern CPU feature sets in x86-64-v3, including AVX2 CPU instructions. AlmaLinux recognized that many community members employed older hardware that relied on x86-64-v2. While x86-64-v3 is enabled by default in AlmaLinux OS 10 and AlmaLinux OS Kitten 10, an additional x86-64-v2 build is also available. The x86-64-v2 build works best for environments that rely on standard OS packages or that can rebuild any additional packages required by x86-64-v2. For users with older hardware, the additional x86-64-v2 build allows continued use of current hardware, saving money and keeping servers from the landfill. AlmaLinux OS 10 is actively supported through 2030 with security support through 2035, significantly extending the life of older hardware....

Many legacy applications and containerized workloads still run on i686, a 32-bit computer processor architecture belonging to the Intel x86 family, including software that only ships as i686, CI pipelines that require a specific 32-bit glibc, and seemingly normal looking containers that require a 32-bit environment. RHEL 10 completely removed 32-bit application support and multilib libraries after deprecating support in earlier releases… AlmaLinux OS 10.2 has added package repos and official container images for 32-bit x86 (but not a 32-bit kernel or installer)…

NVIDIA GPUs, ubiquitous in modern computing, have been a pain point for Linux users. Getting the closed-source NVIDIA drivers has required extra steps and manual installation. When NVIDIA released an open source version of their graphics driver, AlmaLinux integrated the drivers, along with the associated CUDA components, into the AlmaLinux repository starting with AlmaLinux OS 9 and 10. AlmaLinux also signs the open source drivers, allowing secure boot with the NVIDIA drivers they ship. Unlike RHEL users, AlmaLinux users now have native support, allowing them to skip manual installation. AlmaLinux users can now enjoy a fully integrated NVIDIA experience.
In addition, “Thanks to ABI compatibility, AlmaLinux can sometimes deliver patches more quickly than RHEL,” the article points out. And it lists other points where AlmaLinux OS 10.2 diverges from RHEL 10:

Check it out

By markdavis • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

I am glad I moved my servers to AlmaLinux. It has been working out really well over the last few years. They were also fast to offer mitigation information and updated packages for each of the high-profile vulnerabilities this year.

If you are worried about what level your processor supports just run this:

  $ /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 —help | grep -A4 ‘glibc-hwcaps directories’

Look for the word “supported” on each level. Mine shows this on my large Xeon 6254 (Alma) servers:

    x86-64-v4 (supported, searched)
    x86-64-v3 (supported, searched)
    x86-64-v2 (supported, searched)

At home on my AMD Ryzen 7 3700X desktop (Mint) I get:

    x86-64-v4
    x86-64-v3 (supported, searched)
    x86-64-v2 (supported, searched)

So I have v3 support, but not v4. Hopefully that will be good enough for a long time coming…

Re:Wait a second…

By thecombatwombat • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

It is, but basically only in the barest most minimally technically legal sense.

Only paying customers have access, and of course they can choose who gets to be a paying customer. Once you get access though, it still is open source, you can still publish derivative works and all. This is technically still GPL compliant and has at least held up for three years now.

In real short, the goal was to cut off Oracle, but they went pretty scorched-earth about it.

Re:Check it out

By 93 Escort Wagon • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

We switched our servers and workstations to AlmaLinux after IBM pulled the rug out from under us with 8. I’ve been very happy with both the product itself and with the people behind it.

Re:Wait a second…

By caseih • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

This was discussed extensively over the last few years.

Disclaimer: lengthy mansplaning post follows for the one or two slashdotters interested but who haven’t followed this long-running controversy.

Until a few years ago, RH had a public git repository of their rpm spec files, and probably also their patch sets (can’t quite remember). Fairly abruptly they shut down that public repository saying that the repo and folks using it to build RHEL clones didn’t provide anything of value to the community (really passive aggressive). This caught a lot of people by surprise and it really was a poke in the eye of the community.

But going back even further, Red Hat’s support contracts have always caused heartburn for free software supporters, particularly with regards to the GPL. A RH support contract grants access to SRPM files for the entire distro to their customers, along with of course the actual RPMS. But the wording of the support contract says you cannot use those files on non-supported installations. Meaning they don’t want you to pay for one server and then use the downloaded files to update your whole cluster, even though the source code license, particularly in the case of the GPL, explicitly grants such permission. Many free software advocates have complained that although RH abides by the GPL technically, they are using contract law to end run around it.

So far as I know, no actual customers of RH have ever been threatened with contract cancellations over this, and to this day Rocky Linux and Oracle both use these RH-downloaded SRPMs to build their distros. I’m not sure to what extend RH actively pursues the accounts used to download by Rocky and Oracle.

RH’s defense is that the upstream CentOS Stream system is public and free to use by the community to build on. This is what Alma Linux does and it works very well while maintaining compatibility with RHEL. The only downside is it’s harder convert an existing install between RHEL and AlmaLinux. Back in the old CentOS days it was easy. I’d bring up a server on CentOS, test it in beta for a few months/year, then before bringing it into production I’d finally roll it over into a supported RHEL instance.

Re:RH said clones offered “nothing of value”

By 93 Escort Wagon • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

Since 2023 I’ve seen AlmaLinux release patches, well ahead of RHEL itself, when several news-making exploits reared their ugly heads. They’re inarguably offering significant added value to the community.

China’s Top Spy Agency Recruited Woman Who Targeted Jensen Huang

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from The New York Times:
A Chinese businesswoman who had a close relationship with the chief executive of one of the most important artificial intelligence companies in the United States was a spy for China’s Ministry of State Security, Beijing’s top intelligence agency, according to people briefed on U.S. surveillance. The businesswoman, Alice Huang, was recruited by the ministry to collect intelligence on Jensen Huang, the chief executive of Nvidia, as part of a drive to learn more about American A.I. chips and potentially influence the company to push for its most advanced chips to be made available to China, the people said.

[…] The New York Times reported last week that Mr. Huang was a target of a Chinese intelligence operation, and that U.S. intelligence agencies were conducting electronic surveillance of Ms. Huang, a Chinese citizen, for at least a year. The Times reported that Mr. Trump had been briefed last year about Mr. Huang’s relationship with her, but chose not to do anything about it. Ms. Huang speaks English well and has relationships with executives at the highest levels of the A.I. chip industry, including Mr. Huang and the leaders of Gigabyte, one of the top assemblers of Nvidia supercomputers, said people who have met her. She has attended industry conferences and private executive dinners. It is unclear when Ms. Huang first met Nvidia’s leader. In 2024, around the time the two of them were photographed together at a bar in Taipei, her company, Megaspeed, began a multibillion-dollar purchase of advanced A.I. microchips.

To many in the industry, the well-funded push by Megaspeed into A.I. appeared to come out of nowhere. Ms. Huang was connected to a network of companies and investors clustered around Shanghai and Zhejiang province that had used their ties to local officials in Shanghai to push aggressively from mobile video games into data centers, which provide the computing power behind artificial intelligence. Megaspeed has been building data centers in Southeast Asia and then renting their computing power to Alibaba, the giant Chinese internet firm, giving China a backdoor way of getting access to advanced Nvidia chips. Nvidia is restricted by the United States from selling those chips directly to China. Beyond its local connections, the network also has a financial link to the Chinese military establishment, through an investment in a cybersecurity subsidiary of China Electronics Technology Group, one of the country’s largest makers of military technology.
Following the report, top Republican lawmakers have asked Jensen Huang to appear before Congress to answer questions. “Recent reports raise significant national security concerns regarding the People’s Republic of China’s access to sensitive US technology and information,” representatives John Moolenaar, Brian Mast, and Rick Crawford said. “The issue of PRC infiltration and access to cutting-edge US technology is core to the investigative work of our three committees this Congress. It is vital that Congress determines the extent to which US national security has been placed at risk,” the lawmakers added.

Businesswoman is doing a lot of work there

By frenchgates • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread
“Businesswoman Pussy Galore was said to have been recruited by master criminal Ernst Stavro Blofeld.”

Sounds like nothing special

By gweihir • • Score: 3 • Thread

Spies will spy. Is this just more “China baaaaad” drivel?

Re:Not quite “nothing”

By dfghjk • • Score: 4, Informative • Thread

Why would Trump care? Unless he could get something out of it, and perhaps he did.

Cryosphere Faces Permanent Damage When World Overshoots 1.5C, Scientists Warn

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot
A UN-backed report warns that even temporarily overshooting the Paris agreement’s 1.5C warming target could cause permanent and widespread losses of glaciers, snow and polar ice sheets. With Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets already melting about six times faster than in the 1990s, the report argues that global temperatures should ultimately be brought back below 1C. The Guardian reports:
The report, which comes as world leaders and diplomats converge on Turkey for the 31st annual Cop climate conference, documented rapid and accelerating melting of the cryosphere and polar oceans, with damages that range from the loss of the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets, driving sea level rises that threaten hundreds of millions of people, to thawing permafrost, which releases more planet-heating gas. Glaciers, which are still responding to historical warming, would only preserve about 70% of their current volume over a timescale of centuries if long-term heating were brought back down to 0.8C, the report found.

Meanwhile, the ice sheets covering Greenland and Antarctica, which are melting about six times faster today than in the 1990s, would continue to lose ice even in scenarios where overshoot is brief and temperature rise returns to 1.5C, the report found. The scientists said a safe, long-term temperature limit for polar ice sheets lies much closer to 1.0C of global heating, and possibly even lower. “Snow and ice respond rapidly to every fraction of a degree of warming,” said [James Kirkham, a glaciologist at ICCI and the lead author of the report. “But most of these systems will take centuries or millennia to recover after overshoot, especially if tipping points are crossed that cause changes to become essentially irreversible.”

Last month, a UNEP report found the world must cut emissions by 18% by 2030 and by 45% by 2035 to have a good chance of keeping temperatures from rising 1.7C above preindustrial levels. It found there were “no good outcomes” of remaining above 1.5C. The cryosphere report found that current policies, which will result in 2.8C of global heating, would reduce the mass of glacier ice to below 10% in the Rockies, Alps, Iceland and Scandinavia. If warming was limited to 1.5C, about 20-35% of the mass would remain. In the Hindu Kush Himalayas, where glaciers are a source of water for nearly a quarter of humanity, current policies will leave just 41% of the ice mass. If warming was limited to 1.5C, 83% would remain.

Re:Cryosphere

By demon driver • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

https://wmo.int/themes/cryosph…

Re:Cryosphere

By dfghjk • • Score: 4, Informative • Thread

ICE doesn’t care whether you “come” illegally, they don’t even care if you’re a native born citizen. And the only way for there to be “no more ICE” is to eliminate “people” like you. Of course, we know this is likely a paid account or bot. Sad that /. cares so little that posts like this continue.

Re:Cryosphere

By stabiesoft • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
Correct. This is why the R’s got slaughtered in TX. I saw some interviews with biz people in the Rio grande. Basically the interview said the hispanic community was fine with deporting criminal illegal immigrants, and they voted for trump in 2024. But what they did not realize was trump did exactly what he said he was going to do. Round them all up (and by all he meant brown skin) and deport them. So the one biz guy was saying he had a legal immigrant mixing up a batch of concrete and ICE swoops in grabs him and throws him in detention for a few days. Finally the guy got out, but did not come back to the employer. I mean why would you? So in 2026, the Rio grande communities voted blue. And they may do the same in 2028. Ted Cruz of all people who has licked donnie’s ass for years is starting to push back. Maybe he realizes he will be toast next time. I’d tell him too little too late Teddy.

Re:Cryosphere

By jacks smirking reven • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread

Thank goodness the conservatives and Trump himself seem incapable of changing that strategy. Stephen Miller is Chief of Staff and when you read most of their media commentators they are onboard with the idea that the path forward is to get more racist and they’ll listen to fake tough guy larpers like Matt Walsh before they consider any amount of self reflection, I mean none of them can even do a post-analysis without involving ChatGPT.

The party of giving up on thinking.

Nothing is permanent

By daninaustin • • Score: 3 • Thread
The world is constantly changing. Nothing is permanent.