Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. A Zoom Screen-Sharing Bug Let Anyone Take Over Other Devices On a Call
  2. Spotify Will Label ‘AI Persona’ Profiles, Exclude Their Music From Recommendations
  3. Paramount Considers Leaving California Amid Antitrust Suit
  4. France Bans Unsolicited Telemarking Calls
  5. England Set To Eliminate Hepatitis C
  6. Zuckerberg’s Superyacht Reportedly Declined To Help Stranded Boat
  7. Reddit Bans 11-Year Account for GPL Game Post, Testing the EU’s DSA
  8. The Roboguard Revolution Is Short-Circuiting
  9. Taxi Drivers Rarely Die of Alzheimer’s
  10. Cyber Vulnerability Sweep Picks Up Royal Navy Drones Sending Data To China
  11. A Data Breach At Shipping Giant Ceva Logistics Is Rippling Across Banks, Retailers, Steam Gamers, and Beyond
  12. Valve Slowly Expands SteamOS Support On Non-Valve Hardware
  13. First Rival Android App Store Arrives In the US Play Store
  14. Wall Street Giants Partner With Nvidia On $500 Billion AI Financing Deal
  15. Meta’s ‘Open’ Muse Glimmer Model Can Run On a Single Computer

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

A Zoom Screen-Sharing Bug Let Anyone Take Over Other Devices On a Call

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Wired:
As AI models gain advanced capabilities to find vulnerabilities in software, develop ways to exploit them, and even carry out autonomous hacking sprees, researchers offered a sobering new example on Tuesday, disclosing vulnerabilities in the video conferencing platform Zoom that could have been exploited to take over targets’ devices. Anyone on a call that involved screen sharing, whether participants or the host, would have been vulnerable to a silent attack that could be carried out with no indication and no interaction from the victim.

Researchers from the digital defense firm A Security say thebugwas discovered in early June using publicly available AI models, and that it took fewer than 20 prompts to uncover the vulnerabilities and create a working attack. Zoom issued a security advisory on Tuesday, including details about fixes the company has already begun rolling out to address the flaws, which affected devices running all operating systems that Zoom supports — Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, and Android.

The vulnerabilities were specifically in the protocol used to facilitate real-time annotation during screen sharing. The researchers say that their AI bug hunting systems specifically delved into this component because, like human bug hunters, they have been trained that convoluted and obscure functions often contain overlooked vulnerabilities. This is particularly true with proprietary, closed-source software. An established company like Zoom presumably does extensive code review and vetting on all components and functions, but without the benefit of public, open review, esoteric yet complex features like annotation are more likely to contain mistakes. The bugs are now patched, with Zoom issuing both server and client-side fixes—or patches for both Zoom’s own servers and the applications that run on customer devices. But the researchers emphasize that it was alarming to contemplate bugs that could have been exploited to take over a target device simply by getting someone onto a Zoom call.
“What is interesting for us and what we believe is dangerous is the democratization of these capabilities — the barrier to entry is dropping rapidly,” A Security cofounder Omer Gull told WIRED ahead of the disclosure. “Before it would have taken a team of five people maybe six months with a lot of refining and iteration to find this. Now people can reach the same results with under 20 prompts. And Zoom is an important type of target because people assume trust when using it. They don’t see it as a threat.”

Spotify Will Label ‘AI Persona’ Profiles, Exclude Their Music From Recommendations

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Spotify will begin labeling AI-generated artist identities with “AI Persona” badges and exclude their music from editorial, algorithmic, and personalized recommendations unless users explicitly follow them. The company says the designation applies to whether an artist profile represents a real person, not whether AI was used to make the music, and will allow appeals for mislabeling. TechCrunch reports:
While Spotify will allow artists to identify themselves as AI Personas, the company says it won’t rely on self-disclosure alone. It will also review artist profiles and identify those where the artist’s name and imagery appear to represent photorealistic AI-generated identities. Spotify said it will begin its review with profiles that have met pre-defined audience thresholds to ensure the more listened-to artists are covered first.

Once labeled, the AI Persona badges will appear on the artist’s profile in the banner and the About section, in Search, and on track rows across playlists. By default, Spotify won’t include AI Personas in its editorial or algorithmic recommendations, nor will it add AI Personas’ music to users’ personalized recommendations — unless they happen to follow an AI Persona. Only users can choose to follow an artist, so it’s an explicit signal that the user wants to hear more music from that person or group.
Spotify wrote in its announcement that, “while we believe all artists have creative choice in determining how they present themselves, Spotify’s programming is focused on elevating music from authentic artists building careers in music.”

“Although there’s a broad spectrum in how artists use AI as a creative tool, the question of whether a profile represents an actual human is one where Spotify can help make a clear determination. This badge is about the artist’s public identity, not about how the music was made,” the company said.

Paramount Considers Leaving California Amid Antitrust Suit

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Paramount CEO David Ellison is threatening to begin moving the studio out of California on October 1 if state Attorney General Rob Bonta refuses to enter settlement talks over the proposed Paramount-Warner Bros. Discovery merger. The company would reportedly move its Los Angeles headquarters first and shift most studio jobs out of the state over five years, with Georgia, Texas, and Tennessee under consideration. Variety reports:
Ellison’s threat to relocate Paramount in retaliation for California’s Bonta leading the charge to kill the WBD deal — a move that would include much of its studio operations, over time — was first reported by industry newsletter Puck. In response, Bonta called Ellison’s planned exit from the state an “attempt to blackmail the state into letting an illegal deal through.”

“Paramount has lost the plot as it continues to lose in court,” the attorney general wrote in a post on X. “It didn’t work the first time — on the eve of our July lawsuit — and it won’t work this time.” Bonta has not publicly said what concessions from Paramount-WBD he would consider acceptable enough to take the lawsuit off the table. But the Democratic attorney general has said any remedies would need to be “structural” (i.e., divestments) rather than “behavioral” (e.g., imposing certain production quotas).

Oct. 1 is when Paramount will begin accruing a “ticking fee” payable to Warner Bros. Discovery shareholders of $7 million per day. The trial in the state AGs’ lawsuit is scheduled to start March 2, 2027, roughly five months after that, so Paramount would be on the hook to pay around $1.2 billion to WBD shareholders by the time the trial is scheduled to conclude. (Paramount’s ticking-fee payments to WBD are not due until the deal closes.) At the Aug. 5 meeting on Paramount’s lot, Ellison told his 12-member senior executive team he expects Paramount to prevail in the antitrust case against the states. However, he also said that if Bonta balks at talks, Paramount will start packing up and moving out of the Golden State in less than two months.

drop in the bucket

By marcle • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

The entire entertainment industry provides about 1.4% of California’s tax revenues. Paramount is only a small fraction of that. Not much leverage against the 4th largest economy in the world.

Paramount is bluffing

By pla • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
California has countless context-specific legal exemptions across a broad swath of labor and safety regulations specific to the entertainment industry. Those exemptions largely don’t exist outside California.

Could that regulatory climate be recreated elsewhere? Of course it could. Will it? Unlikely, and certainly not in the next two months. But hey, who needs child actors or a clear process for managing liability when an action hero accidentally ends up inside a real wood chipper? Not Ellison!

Re:Great

By alcmena • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

It’s cute you don’t think he’s going to do it anyway shortly after the deal closes…

Makes no sense

By SoftwareArtist • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

This is absurd on so many levels.

To start with, it’s not like the lawsuit has anything to do with what state they’re based in. The California AG happens to be leading it, but it’s a coalition of 12 states. It’s not as if they could escape the suit by moving to another state. This is purely a pressure tactic, nothing more.

Actually moving would be incredibly expensive. Build entirely new studios. Relocate all their employees. Lose a whole lot of employees who don’t want to relocate.

And anywhere else they moved to would be a worse place. They’re located in Los Angeles because that’s the heart of the film industry. That’s where the workers are. That’s where all the other companies that support the industry are. Trying to operate in Georgia or Tennessee would be much harder for them.

Even if they somehow decided it made sense to move, that’s not a decision you make quickly or lightly. It would take long and careful planning to choose a new location and prepare for the move. But here he is, saying they’re going to start moving in less than two months, and he hasn’t even decided what state to move to. Is anyone really supposed to take this seriously?

If in spite of everything he really tries to go through with this, expect a shareholder lawsuit and calls for the board to fire him. But he’d have to be crazy to really do it.

Re:Great

By fahrbot-bot • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Oh no! $500 million dollars taken away from the $275 BILLION collected in taxes. What ever will CA do without that $500 million?!?

Guessing California will still be the 4th largest economy in the world.

2024 Nominal GDP
- United States: $29.18T (I think this excludes CA GDP, below)
- China: $18.64T
- Germany: $4.65T
- California: $4.10T
- Japan: $4.02T
- India: $3.90T
- United Kingdom: $3.64T

California is followed by Texas is at $2.9T and New York is at $2.4T.

France Bans Unsolicited Telemarking Calls

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Starting today, unsolicited telemarking calls are banned in France unless consumers explicitly consent to them. Companies that violate the law can face fines of up to 375,000 euros per call, though existing customers can still be contacted with related offers. Le Monde reports:
The government says the law is a response to years of consumer complaints. Authorities estimate that about three-quarters of people in France receive at least one unsolicited sales call every week, and many receive more. In 2024, 11 consumer organizations issued a joint call for a ban, denouncing “relentless harassment of consumers through countless unwanted telemarketing calls to both landlines and mobile phones — an intrusion that has become a regular part of their daily lives.”

Now, “businesses are prohibited from contacting consumers without their prior consent,” said Alice Vilcot, chief of staff at the Directorate-General for Competition, Consumer Affairs and Prevention of Fraud. “That consent can be withdrawn at any time.” […] Previously in France, people who wanted to avoid marketing calls had to register their number with a government-run service, but consumer groups said some call centers ignored the list. Vilcot noted that an Ireland-based company was fined 6 million euros ($6.9 million) last year for violating France’s previous telemarketing rules by calling people on the no-call list.

Telemark calls?

By 93 Escort Wagon • Score: 4, Funny Thread

Are there a bunch of down-on-their-luck ski instructors cold-calling people in France for some reason?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…

Nothing will change. They will keep calling.

By MikeDataLink • Score: 4, Informative Thread

They do not care about the law.

Phone # added to do-not-call list 20 years ago…

By Locke2005 • Score: 3 Thread
…still get serveral unsolicited phone calls every day. This will only get worse as AI drives the cost of phone harrassment to zero. Tell me again how passing laws is gonna stop them… it gets funnier every time! How does France plan on enforcing those laws against bots calling from another country over the internet?

England Set To Eliminate Hepatitis C

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from the BBC:
England is on track to become one of the first countries in the world to eliminate hepatitis C, a dangerous virus that attacks the liver, figures show. The target of treating 80% of all known cases has already been met, and deaths from the virus have fallen by 36% in the last decade, just short of what is needed by 2030. Taking antiviral tablets for 8 to 12 weeks can cure more than 95% of cases. Initiatives including A&E blood tests, GP registration testing and free at-home tests have helped to find people who were previously undiagnosed, says NHS England.

NHS England says that since 2015, more than 100,000 people have been diagnosed and treated for hepatitis C, meaning the country is already meeting that target. Another goal — a 65% reduction in hepatitis C-related mortality compared with 2015 levels — has yet to be met, but might be before the 2030 target date. Around 50,200 adults are living with hepatitis C, figures for England in 2024 suggest. Estimates indicate 84.6% of those living with hepatitis C have been diagnosed — just short of the 90% target. The Hepatitis C Trust says England is “on the cusp” of one of the most significant public health achievements in our country’s history.

It’s about time

By TechyImmigrant • Score: 5, Funny Thread

The are really pushing hepatitis C++ these days.
 

Re:Doesn’t make any sense.

By Kernel Kurtz • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Thirty years ago, they were telling us it’s incurable now suddenly it’s eliminated in England? No wonder nobody trusts “scientists” anymore.

Many medical advances have been made since the 90s, even if you yourself have learned nothing new in that time.

Re:Completely infeffective

By ceoyoyo • Score: 4, Informative Thread

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…

They’re way ahead of you. By more than a century.

Re: America: Challenge Accepted

By shilly • Score: 5, Informative Thread

1. Separate shots haven’t been made at scale since 2009, so there’s no chance of doing this for the relevant populations
2. It creates a significant window of months in which babies are unprotected for two of the diseases, so it’s materially more dangerous
3. It means all these kids have more injections and discomfort
4. It’s pandering to idiocy. It’s really simple to explain that kids are exposed to far more pathogens on the daily than they’ll get in the three shots, and that their immune systems can cope. We need to do that, not admit defeat by dumbasses

Re: America: Challenge Accepted

By thegarbz • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

If that’s what it takes to get skeptical parents to vaccinate their children In okay with that. But let’s get those kids vaccinated ASAP.

The reason the MMR vaccine was combined is to reduce the amount of missed vaccine appointments. Splitting MMR is going to cause more kids from responsible parents to become unintentionally unvaccinated than it is going to save the offspring of a couple of fucking morons.

Zuckerberg’s Superyacht Reportedly Declined To Help Stranded Boat

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Ancient Slashdot reader Alain Williams shares a report from The Guardian:
Mark Zuckerberg has faced questions over why a small cruise ship in south-east Alaska rescued a stranded skiff and its crew when his 387ft superyacht had been closer. The Silicon Valley billionaire’s yacht, worth a reported $300 million, is said to have "repeatedly” declined to assist when a nearby boat called for help last week. Zuckerberg, CEO of Facebook and Instagram owner Meta Platforms, was not on board at the time, a spokesperson told Forbes.

When a nearby 21ft skiff ran out of fuel between Petersburg and Juneau, the Alaska Beacon reported operators of a cruise ship that was further away than Zuckerberg’s yacht came to the rescue. “I’m on a small-ship Alaska cruise with my son,” a passenger on the UnCruise Adventures ship Wilderness Legacy posted on Bluesky. “Our boat rescued a stranded vessel last night and apparently we did that after the Coast Guard radioed Mark Zuckerberg’s yacht — which was closer — and they repeatedly refused to respond. (There was near unanimous booing when the captain announced this).”
A spokesperson for Zuckerberg told Forbes that the yacht crew had been operating on a different radio channel and “the assist was already under way” by the time they discovered the broadcast.

46USC2304 - Duty to provide assistance at sea

By pla • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Did they actively “decline” to help, or did they never even respond?

The distinction is worth two years in prison.

Excuses sound a little… fishy?

By sizzzzlerz • Score: 4, Funny Thread

It must be true because most $300M yachts can afford only a single radio so that when they’re downloading the latest stock prices or ordering a resupply of steaks and champagne, they can’t monitor the Coast Guard emergency channel. And even, if later, they hear the call but a rescue is underway, who needs a backup vessel in case something happens to the primary rescue boat.

potentially criminal act

By cosmicl • Score: 4, Informative Thread
The Duty to Save Lives: Federal law (46 U.S.C. 2304), the SOLAS Convention, and UNCLOS Article 98 mandate that ship masters proceed with all speed to rescue persons in distress at sea.Penalties for Refusal: In the United States, failing to render assistance when able can result in criminal penalties, including a fine up to $1,000 and imprisonment for up to 2 years Likely Zuck would be able to throw his ship’s master under the bus for this. And the BS about being on a different channel. You are expected monitor VHF channel 16. It’s not hard.

Re:46USC2304 - Duty to provide assistance at sea

By taustin • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Only if there was an actual distress call, which, according to the Coast Guard, there was not.

This is just hate wanking on The Zuck. Which, mind you, is always fun, and he certainly deserves it, but let’s not exaggerate things.

More detailed explanation

By UnknowingFool • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

This YouTuber covered the initial news as well as the response from Zuckerburg’s superyacht. He has worked on cruise ships and yachts, and his entire channel is about yachts and superyachts. Some points that he brings up:

Reddit Bans 11-Year Account for GPL Game Post, Testing the EU’s DSA

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Longtime Slashdot reader DF5JT writes:
On July 26, I posted a single announcement in r/backgammon: GNU Backgammon for Android, GPLv3, the first standalone backgammon engine on F-Droid. Reddit’s spam filter removed the post and permanently banned my 11-year, 30,000-karma account — the result is publicly visible at reddit.com/user/OE1FEU. To this day, Reddit has given no reason whatsoever, although Article 17 of the EU’s Digital Services Act makes a statement of reasons mandatory. The only appeal channel is a 250-character web form that sends no confirmation and has never been answered; Reddit’s own help text admits: “you may not have received a message to your inbox.” A GDPR export of 11 years of data came to 7.2 MB; every post was truncated after a few lines, with zero data about the ban decision.

So I spent one day escalating through every mechanism the EU provides: certified out-of-court dispute settlement at Austria’s RTR, complaints with the Austrian and Dutch Digital Services Coordinators, the data protection authority (citing the ECJ’s SCHUFA ruling on automated decisions), noyb, and Austria’s consumer association. Bonus finding: the European Commission’s DSA Transparency Database contains 14,067 Reddit statements of reasons for that week — none for my ban — and the Commission’s own feedback form limits reports to 500 characters and crashed with a 500 Server Error. Is the DSA enforceable for ordinary users, or just paperwork?

Re:This is a bit too new to tell

By Tom • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The DSA has teeth, but bureaucracy is slow.

Which is often intentional.

We live in 2026. You can order an artillery or drone strike in Ukraine from a tablet and it’ll be delivered within minutes. Data processing speeds are essentially instant for data sets not on LLM sizes. We have automation everywhere when it suits the right people. e.g. that speeding ticket you received for going 12 km/h over the limit? No human ever so much as saw that. Full automated process. Takes 6-12 weeks. Why? Because otherwise you might still remember how fast you were actually going or that you weren’t even in that street on that day, and fight it. Same principle here: The slower the bureaucracy, the more people will just give up and go away. It’s a self-regulating system to reduce the number of inquiries to the amount that the public servants can comfortably process.

Re:Similar issue

By sinkskinkshrieks • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Reddit is owned by greedy corporate asshole hipsters in SF (including Sam Altman of OpenAI) who don’t give 2 flying fucks about EU regulations, liberal democratic values like due process, transparency, or benefit of the doubt, or human review that doesn’t involve bullshit justifications to double-down on the original, undisclosed “pronouncement” of the AI.

Re:Similar issue

By jenningsthecat • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Best of luck to you, and I hope Reddit gets the screws put to them bigtime.

I don’t know much about this stuff. My first thought is that the law should force companies like Reddit to have a DSAR banner on every page their site serves. It would show the total number of DSARs filed to date, and have a link to a page listing ALL of them, both pending and resolved - with personally identifiable stuff redacted, of course.

If legislation forced such businesses to make every gaslighting move blatantly public, maybe the behaviour would improve.

Re:Similar issue

By AmiMoJo • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Yeah, but at least if I prevail they will have to compensate me for their asshole techbro policies.

Re:Similar issue

By AmiMoJo • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Reddit explicitly allows multiple accounts: https://support.reddithelp.com…

The Roboguard Revolution Is Short-Circuiting

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
alternative_right shares a report from 404 Media:
Robotics companies promise that video-camera-toting security robots can deter and detect crime. But many companies are rethinking the approach after a trail of canceled contracts and questions about whether the artificial intelligence-powered bots are meeting the needs of businesses and local governments. Proof News found evidence of at least 21 security robot deployments since 2015. We contacted contract holders and combed news articles and determined that at least 13 of those programs have ended. Silicon Valley-based Knightscope secured the most security robot contracts, according to Proof’s analysis, and also suffered the bulk of cancellations.

For example, New York City’s then-Mayor Eric Adams installed a Knightscope robot on the overnight shift at the Times Square subway station, but the program was scrapped when the pilot expired in 2024. City leaders did not respond to Proof News’ questions about why the robot wasn’t renewed. By the end of its assignment, it was reportedly gathering dust in an empty storefront. Outside Columbus, Ohio, the city of Dublin pulled the plug on a Knightscope robot in May, ending its two-year pilot program after less than 10 months. The city enlisted the robot, dubbed DubBot, to patrol a downtown park, but city spokeswoman Robyn Gray said it “did not fully meet our operational needs,” and failed to identify any criminal incidents or lead to any tickets or arrests.

[…] Seeking a new path forward in the security industry, Knightscope CEO William Santana Li said the company is forging a new model, combining its robots and AI-powered software with another key ingredient: human security guards. Knightscope announced it purchased Event Risk LLC, a national security guard firm, earlier this year. Knightscope has incurred net losses since inception in 2013, according to its most recent quarterly filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, and is $273 million in debt. Knightscope hopes its pivot to incorporate people will give it a greater share of the physical security market — which the company believes is worth an estimated $230 billion annually. Li declined to answer questions about the disbanded programs, but said in an email, “Technology cannot do everything — and neither can people — but the combination can be very powerful.”

Wrong focus

By Bert64 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Here’s the problem..

failed to identify any criminal incidents or lead to any tickets or arrests

Focusing on identifying incidents and making arrests… What if the robot deterred incidents from taking place at all? Surely that would be better.

Re:Wrong focus

By Fons_de_spons • Score: 5, Funny Thread
My guess is that it probably failed to identify the criminal that put a big “kick me” sign on the robot’s back.

Backwards

By az-saguaro • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Knightscope announced it purchased Event Risk LLC, a national security guard firm, earlier this year.

Not uncommon to hear stories like this, but the dynamics always seemed backward to me. The purchase should have been the other way around.

Knightscope is a high tech Silicon Valley company. I know nothing about them, but can infer they are VC funded, and their valuation is based on hope and “tech this, tech that, and AI everywhere”, funded by the lemmings, the pied piper, and the kingdom of the emperor’s new clothes.

And, they have failed to make a product that actually won in the marketplace, being dropped by early customers, and are in some serious debt. They pin their hopes on buying a company that may actually be smaller but has a service that works, is probably profitable (or, at least a balanced sheet), has been around awhile, and would likely do just fine on their own without any interference - BUT - they are small potatoes because they are not high tech chi chi, and they are not funded by SiVal VC.

So, who should by whom? Event Risk, the security people company, could rightly look into improving services and efficiency by using tech products like those made by Knightscope the security tech company - test it out, see if it fits, adopt it if promising, etc. - and if it really works, even buy up Knightscope. That makes sense from an operational and business alignment point of view.

But, it’s going the other way, because of desparation, VC money, false hopes that more VC money will rescue failure. The losers are buying the winners, but it should be the other way around.

Seems like I heard this story about umpty million times in the past 30 years. I wonder what the statistics are on how those mergers and acquisitions actually pan out, and if the VC’s do their diligence in pre-assessing all of this.

Taxi Drivers Rarely Die of Alzheimer’s

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader shares a report from The Conversation, written by Hatim Sharif, a civil and environmental engineer who has “spent more than two decades staring at maps” and spatial data. Sharif finds one connection especially fascinating: the link between spatial reasoning and why taxi drivers seem to have lower rates of Alzheimer’s. From the report:
Taxi and ambulance drivers are less likely than workers in almost any other job to die of Alzheimer’s disease. That was the surprising result of a 2024 study examining the death certificates of nearly 9 million people in the U.S. […] Of the 9 million death certificates from January 2020 to December 2022 that researchers examined, taxi and ambulance drivers had the lowest risk of dying from Alzheimer’s disease out of 443 occupations. After adjusting for age, sex, race, ethnicity and education, roughly 1 in 100 taxi and ambulance drivers died of Alzheimer’s, compared with 1 in 60 people overall. This pattern did not extend to other driving jobs.

The researchers concluded that the key to reducing the risk of Alzheimer’s was not driving itself but continuous real-time navigation: the constant work of locating yourself in space, tracking a destination and updating a mental map as conditions change. Drivers whose jobs relied on fixed or predetermined routes, like bus drivers and aircraft pilots, didn’t seem to experience a similar advantage. Researchers believe the association between navigation-heavy work and lower Alzheimer’s risk centers on the hippocampus, a part of the brain that governs memory and spatial navigation. It’s one of the first brain regions that Alzheimer’s damages: Problems with spatial navigation and orientation are among the earliest signs of the disease, sometimes surfacing before obvious memory loss.

In one landmark 2000 study, neuroscientists compared the brains of licensed London taxi drivers with those of people who did not drive cabs. Their findings provided the first evidence via structural imaging that regions of the adult brain can measurably change under sustained navigational demand. To earn a license, London cabbies must memorize more than 25,000 streets within a 6-mile radius of Charing Cross, a challenge known as "The Knowledge" that takes three to four years.

The researchers found that London taxi drivers had measurably more gray matter in the posterior hippocampus, a brain area tied to storing large-scale spatial maps. That volume tracked with experience: The longer someone had driven, the larger that part of the brain. The change was built through practice, not inherited. While people who are good at navigation might gravitate to this kind of job, the job itself does have an impact on the brain. Together, these two studies make a coherent case: Work that intensively exercises the hippocampus may reshape it, and that reshaping may protect against one of the most feared diseases of aging.

What about navigating PornHub?

By thesjaakspoiler • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Just asking for a friend.

Re:Do they die earlier, of stress?

By T34L • Score: 5, Informative Thread
IDK; if you’re interested in that you could like, open the study and read the first few paragraphs?

Main outcomes measures Among 443 occupations studied, percentage of deaths attributed to Alzheimer’s disease for taxi drivers and ambulance drivers and each of the remaining 441 occupations, adjusting for age at death and other sociodemographic factors.

We then used multivariable logistic regression at the individual level to estimate risk adjusted percentages of deaths from Alzheimer’s disease for each occupation, adjusting for age at death (indicator variables for each year of age), sex (male or female), race and ethnic group (black, white, Hispanic, Asian or Pacific Islander, other race), and educational attainment (indicator variables for 8th grade, 9-12th grade, high school, college, master’s or doctorate). Mortality odds ratios from the multivariable model were also ranked from lowest to highest across occupations to facilitate identification of occupations with the lowest risk of death from Alzheimer’s disease; chief executive (occupation code: 0010) was arbitrarily chosen as the reference group in regression models. We performed four sensitivity analyses to assess the robustness of our comparisons…

Would you look at that, Slashdot skeptic! The scientists running the study actually did control for the blatantly obvious codependent variables. What a time to be alive!

Re:Or it kills them undiagnosed

By T34L • Score: 5, Informative Thread
Or perhaps the study has controlled for that, as it clearly explains in the freely accessible text.

Accept All

By TwistedGreen • Score: 3 Thread

Now Google Maps will have to have an additional warning stating that use of the app may give you Azlheimer’s. Don’t read it, just hit Accept All.

Use it or Lose it

By Local ID10T • Score: 3 Thread

The brain needs exercise like muscles do. The type of activities that cab drivers do provide cognitive exercise. Sadly, they don’t get as much physical exercise. It’s a trade off.

The take away should be that if you want a long and healthy life -live a physically and mentally active life.

Cyber Vulnerability Sweep Picks Up Royal Navy Drones Sending Data To China

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
A routine security assessment found that cameras aboard Royal Navy Kraken unmanned surface vessels were sending “heartbeat” signals to an IP address in China. “A thorough investigation found no evidence of MoD data or systems being accessed, compromised or transmitted externally,” said a Ministry of Defense spokesperson. “Our assurance and testing processes are designed to identify and address potential vulnerabilities early, and we continue to undertake routine security activity across our systems and equipment.” The Register reports:
According to reports, the talkative components were cameras sourced by Kraken from a third-party supplier. The incident raises questions about supply chains, audits, and cybersecurity in the British armed forces. The spokesperson said: “The first duty of government is national security, and we take the security of our equipment, networks, and data extremely seriously.”

Re:But why did they have access to the Internet?!

By Retired Chemist • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Probably because that is how they are sending data and receiving instructions. This sounds a lot more serious than they are trying to make it. Potentially it means that an enemy (China) could locate your “stealthy” drones and destroy or mislead them.

Not making things is a strategic vulnerability

By RightwingNutjob • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Seeing as it puts you at the mercy of the people who make your stuff for you.

History, both recent and not so recent, repeats this lesson again and again.

Re:Does it matter though?

By Richard_at_work • Score: 5, Informative Thread

You can piggy back on the civilian infrastructure without ever exposing devices - just require all devices to access anything beyond the local network via a specific router, which pushes all traffic over a VPN, and nothing goes out over the naked internet as its all dropped if its not going over the VPN. Then all you need to ensure are thoroughly audted and hardened are those routers - everything else cant hit the internet.

Re:Does it matter though?

By upuv • Score: 5, Informative Thread

It actually does.

It does a few things. ( If the heart beats actually make it back to China. ) They would likely make it back since the devices would likely have redundant connection mechanisms. A lot of drones use starlink now and this is effectively public. The US has an early starshield capability. Not sure if this is shared with friendlies yet.
1. The device is alive. Meaning turned on and active. Meaning it is in use for an operation or training.
2. It’s ping or latency time can be used to build a heat map of likely world wide locations. This used to be tricky not so much any more.
3. It’s giving away at least part of the network path to the device.

So basically it can tells China with this data what the theatre of operations likely is. Which destroys the element of surprise. If a bunch of English drones all of a sudden start showing up around Taiwan for example it’s tells China a lot. This could and would compromise operational security and potentially lives. It would also raise tension levels between nations.

If enough drones are doing the same thing then the data quality will improve.

And at no time does the drone have to be hacked. No attempt to communicate with the drone needed. The simple fact that a phone home command is sent is enough to compromise safety.

So it does matter.

Re:But why did they have access to the Internet?!

By sabbede • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
I’m not sure they did. The article is vague about it, so it could just be that the camera was trying to send packets, not that they actually left the drone (hitting a firewall or gap). The MoD’s statement could be interpreted to support that.

A Data Breach At Shipping Giant Ceva Logistics Is Rippling Across Banks, Retailers, Steam Gamers, and Beyond

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from TechCrunch:
Ceva Logistics, one of the world’s largest shipping and logistics giants, has been hacked. Several companies that rely on Ceva for shipping their products to their customers say that their personal information was also stolen in the breach. The cyberattack on Ceva is affecting at least eight warehouses across Europe used for shipping goods across the continent, the company told TechCrunch. Industry news site FreightWaves reports that the hack began on July 29 and is causing shipping delays for many of the goods in affected warehouses.

Ceva is a France-headquartered shipping and logistics giant that companies around the world rely on to deliver their goods from their assembly lines to customer homes. The company, which brought in $18.3 billion in revenue in 2025, has over a thousand warehouses across the world. […] The hack at Ceva also resulted in a data breach, affecting a large amount of personal information belonging to retail customers that Ceva relies on for delivering goods to people’s home addresses. Several companies reported that hackers took their customers’ names, home addresses, phone numbers, and email addresses used to place their orders from Ceva’s systems.

Dutch online retail giant Bol said on its website that hackers gained access to systems of its warehousing partner, Ceva, and warned that their customers’ data may have been taken. Bol also said that it expects delays and some customer orders to be canceled as a result of the incident. De Bijenkorf, another Dutch luxury retailer, similarly confirmed order delays following the theft of its customers’ data, per local media. Football club Ajax, banking giant ING, and eyeglass maker Ace & Tate also reported that customers’ shipping information was affected. Video game giant Valve told customers that it learned on August 7 that data was taken from Ceva’s systems, and alerted customers who recently bought its Steam hardware that they had personal information taken in the incident. Valve said in its note to customers, posted to Reddit, that Ceva stores their shipping and delivery information for 90 days following their order.
So far, Ceva says the agency has received data breach reports from 10 organizations in relation to the incident.

ChatGPT, everything is permitted

By blue trane • Score: 4, Funny Thread

Can you please figure out a way to pay for yourself?

Why was all that in one database?

By Aristos Mazer • Score: 3, Insightful Thread

No business role needs all that info. Why was all of that in one place to steal?

Banks, Retailers, Steam Gamers

By 93 Escort Wagon • Score: 3 Thread

One of these things is not like the other
One of these things just doesn’t belong
Can you tell me which thing is not like the other
Before I finish this song?

Valve Slowly Expands SteamOS Support On Non-Valve Hardware

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Valve is continuing to broaden SteamOS support beyond its own hardware, with the latest beta adding “initial gamepad support” for a few recent gaming handhelds and improving compatibility for a few others. Ars Technica reports:
Those newly supported handhelds include MSI’s Claw 8 EX AI+, the extremely expensive, extremely powerful handheld built around Intel’s Arc G3 processor that launched this summer. While SteamOS has long included beta support for “other AMD powered handhelds,” Valve has only recently been working on offering compatibility with Intel-based handhelds like the MSI Claw line. This weekend’s update suggests the company hasn’t abandoned those efforts and that Intel chips aren’t being left out of the SteamOS conversation.

SteamOS 3.8.25 also newly supports the controllers built into Ayaneo’s Android-focused Pocket S2 and the more recently released Windows-based Konkr Fit. Valve also says the new OS offers “improved support” for older MSI Claw devices and the OneXPlayer line of portable gaming PCs. This weekend’s update follows June’s SteamOS 3.8 update, which stressed “improved compatibility with recent Intel and AMD platforms.” That update specifically called out improved controller support on handhelds from the likes of GPD Win, Anbernic, and OrangePi, as well as improvements for various Lenovo Legion Go, MSI Claw, and OneXPlayer devices.
The report notes that the new SteamOS update also updates the Linux driver powering the new Steam Controller, “allowing it to work with ‘native controller applications’ even when Steam is not running.”

First Rival Android App Store Arrives In the US Play Store

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Aptoide has become the first third-party Android app store available directly through Google Play in the U.S. “The change is a direct result of Google’s litigation with Epic, which saw a judge rule in 2024 that the Play Store would have to open up to third-party stores,” notes The Verge. The change makes rival storefronts far easier to discover and install, potentially opening the door for Epic, Amazon, Samsung, Microsoft and others to distribute their own app stores through Google’s store. From the report:
Third-party app stores have always been available on Android, which is a more open platform than iOS in that respect. However, until now they’ve only been available if pre-installed on a device — as with the Amazon Appstore on Fire tablets or Samsung’s Galaxy Store — or installed via sideloading. Listing rival storefronts within the Play Store makes them much easier for users to find and access. […]

Aptoide itself is relatively little known, but it’s likely to be the first of many alternative app stores. It’s presumably only a matter of time before the Epic Store makes its own appearance, and the likes of Amazon, Samsung, and other phone manufacturers may also want to put their stores in front of potential customers.

For me, f-droid.org is the only “app store” I need

By ffkom • Score: 3, Interesting Thread
And I have a really hard time to understand why other people would want those closed source Adware/Malware/Spyware things distributed on inferior “app stores” like Google’s.

Re:For me, f-droid.org is the only “app store” I n

By test321 • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Just FYI, F-droid is actually a fork of Aptoide, the original decentralised open source app store, even named after Debian’s package manager.

Further enshitification?

By Fuzi719 • Score: 3 Thread
Soon, you’ll need to have 10 different “app stores” installed on your phone just to have the apps you want because each app will sign “exclusivity” deals with different stores. UGH.

Wall Street Giants Partner With Nvidia On $500 Billion AI Financing Deal

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Nvidia is working with Wall Street heavyweights on a potential $500 billion financing package for AI infrastructure (source paywalled; alternative source). The consortium includes BlackRock’s Global Infrastructure Partners, Brookfield Asset Management, Goldman Sachs and KKR. The Financial Times reports:
The partnership underscores Nvidia’s growing efforts to raise capital for itself and its clients to continue assembling the chips, power production and data centres at the heart of the AI boom. The $5.25 trillion company has positioned itself at the centre of the AI boom, providing chips, infrastructure and software to a wide array of partners developing the technology. Nvidia’s graphics processing units, or GPUs, underpin most of the leading US AI models available today.

[…] The biggest cloud-computing companies, including Meta, Oracle, Microsoft, Alphabet and Amazon, have dramatically increased their spending on AI infrastructure as they look to win the race to dominate the emerging technology. Morgan Stanley projects so-called hyperscalers will spend $3.5 trillion between 2026 and 2028. That need for capital has forced technology groups to tap every source of cash they can find, including public equity, investment-grade and high-yield bonds, securitized debt, private credit and project finance markets.
"[The] sheer size of the AI infrastructure build-out is unprecedented,” Jim Zelter, president of Apollo, said on an earnings call earlier this month. “More than $8 trillion of capital is expected to be invested, a staggering sum. We see an enormous opportunity for private capital to finance a portion of this along with public capital.”

Debt Incoming!

By crunchy_one • Score: 5, Informative Thread
Nvidia taking on $500B of crippling debt to keep the plates spinning. Judging from the drop in NVDA share price, the street doesn’t like it.

Translated from WallSpeak

By Registered Coward v2 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

“More than $8 trillion of capital is expected to be invested, a staggering sum. We see an enormous opportunity for private capital to finance a portion of this along with public capital.”

Translated: “We’ll get all the upside and foist the downside on public investors. “

We keep adding ‘towns’

By wakeboarder • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

below the financial dam that is not sound and could break any time. This won’t bode well for all of us if it breaks.

Yes drag the financial system into the AI madness

By nikkipolya • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Pull all industries into this AI madness to create one large, highly interconnected, “too big to fail” mega entity. When it burns itself, fed (tax payers) will have no choice but to bail this entire “AI slop ball” out.

All I see here is scamming of the public.

By Fly Swatter • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
We see an enormous opportunity for private capital to finance a portion

No, it is a giant rug pull, does anyone with a brain expect to make a long term profit buying such stock?

.. securitized debt ..

this almost tripped me up as I confused it with secured debt - no this is just a bunch of smaller debts bundled up and offered to some? sucker?

We are no longer in a bubble, this how you build a financial apocalypse.

Meta’s ‘Open’ Muse Glimmer Model Can Run On a Single Computer

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot
Meta has released Muse Glimmer, a slimmed-down open-weight AI model designed to run locally on a single GPU for agent tasks such as scheduling, file management, coding, and tool use. The release is based on Meta’s closed Muse Spark 1.2 model and appears to be aimed at attracting developers who want capable AI agents without relying entirely on cloud-hosted services. Engadget reports:
Facebook said that it’s making the “weights” that AI systems use to choose responses available to everyone on Hugging Face along with developer documentation. The download is available for free, and users can run the model on their own PCs. The company noted that optimized integrations will land on llama.cpp and other sites, “so you can go from download to working agent in minutes.”

The model is powerful for its size, according to Meta, with the “strong success rates” on benchmarks like DeepSearch QA, MCP-Atlas and SWE-Bench (which evaluates its ability write and debug code). It also supports reliable tool use, multi-step reasoning, failure recovery, multimodal input and scaffold compatibility for work with OpenClaw and other agent orchestrators. It was trained on data from over 100 languages, the company added.
“Rather than centralizing superintelligence, we should distribute it widely and give every person the ability to direct it,” CEO Mark Zuckerberg said in an essay accompanying Muse Glimmer’s release. “This has the potential to begin a new era of personal empowerment where individuals can use this powerful new capability to reach their full potential, pursue their interests, and improve their lives and the world more than ever before.”

Re:What card?

By EvilSS • Score: 4, Informative Thread
A 24gb card will work for full offload (3090/4090). Looking at the model it should use around 21gb total. Note that is just the model. If you want to use it for coding or something else requiring a very large context then yea, 5090 with 32gb.

Re:What card?

By sabbede • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Nah, you needed to buy three when they came out. You could sell the other two now for $4k or more, leaving you with one 5090 and some extra cash.

And how f-d up is that? Since when does computer hardware increase in value after it was released?

Zuck Wakes Up

By Spinlock_1977 • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Zuckerberg has finally realized his shop doesn’t have the AI muscle to compete with the top dogs, so instead he’s emulating the Chinese model of releasing open models in an effort to undercut OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.

‘24 GB or 32 GB envelope’

By Fly Swatter • Score: 3 Thread
Well a single computer can have that, just not affordably.

Why is there no AI cube that has a general purpose CPU, plenty of ram and a GPU with 64GB+ that you can just plop on your intranet? Or is that simply not cost competitive to a cloud AI in your neighbor’s back yard that has debt pouring out the wazoo and heavily discounted by the local government.