Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Is Dark Matter’s Main Rival Theory Dead?
  2. Father of SQL Says Yes to NoSQL
  3. AMD Core Performance Boost For Linux Getting Per-CPU Core Controls
  4. Are Small Modular Nuclear Reactors Costly and Unviable?
  5. Former Boeing Quality Inspector Turns Whistleblower, Says Plane Parts Had Serious Defects
  6. The World’s Largest Vaccuum to Suck Climate Pollution From the Air Just Began Operating
  7. Google Employees Question Execs Over ‘Decline in Morale’ After Blowout Earnings
  8. Red Hat (and CIQ) Offer Extend Support for RHEL 7 (and CentOS 7)
  9. RHEL (and Rocky and Alma Linux) 9.4 Released - Plus AI Offerings
  10. The People Who Won’t Give Up Floppy Disks
  11. Could Stem Cells One Day Cure Diabetes?
  12. Lightweight Dillo Browser Resurrected: TLS But No JavaScript
  13. NASA’s Plan To Build a Levitating Robot Train on the Moon
  14. ‘Hunt For Gollum’ Short on YouTube Survives New Peter Jackson Movie Announcement
  15. Did OpenAI, Google and Meta ‘Cut Corners’ to Harvest AI Training Data?

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Is Dark Matter’s Main Rival Theory Dead?

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“One of the biggest mysteries in astrophysics today is that the forces in galaxies do not seem to add up,” write two U.K. researchers in the Conversation:
Galaxies rotate much faster than predicted by applying Newton’s law of gravity to their visible matter, despite those laws working well everywhere in the Solar System. To prevent galaxies from flying apart, some additional gravity is needed. This is why the idea of an invisible substance called dark matter was first proposed. But nobody has ever seen the stuff. And there are no particles in the hugely successful Standard Model of particle physics that could be the dark matter — it must be something quite exotic.

This has led to the rival idea that the galactic discrepancies are caused instead by a breakdown of Newton’s laws. The most successful such idea is known as Milgromian dynamics or Mond [also known as modified Newtonian dynamics], proposed by Israeli physicist Mordehai Milgrom in 1982. But our recent research shows this theory is in trouble…

Due to a quirk of Mond, the gravity from the rest of our galaxy should cause Saturn’s orbit to deviate from the Newtonian expectation in a subtle way. This can be tested by timing radio pulses between Earth and Cassini. Since Cassini was orbiting Saturn, this helped to measure the Earth-Saturn distance and allowed us to precisely track Saturn’s orbit. But Cassini did not find any anomaly of the kind expected in Mond. Newton still works well for Saturn… Another test is provided by wide binary stars — two stars that orbit a shared centre several thousand AU apart. Mond predicted that such stars should orbit around each other 20% faster than expected with Newton’s laws. But one of us, Indranil Banik, recently led a very detailed study that rules out this prediction. The chance of Mond being right given these results is the same as a fair coin landing heads up 190 times in a row. Results from yet another team show that Mond also fails to explain small bodies in the distant outer Solar System…

The standard dark matter model of cosmology isn’t perfect, however. There are things it struggles to explain, from the universe’s expansion rate to giant cosmic structures. So we may not yet have the perfect model. It seems dark matter is here to stay, but its nature may be different to what the Standard Model suggests. Or gravity may indeed be stronger than we think — but on very large scales only.
“Ultimately though, Mond, as presently formulated, cannot be considered a viable alternative to dark matter any more,” the researchers conclude. “We may not like it, but the dark side still holds sway.”

is gravity a 5+d force?

By Stalyn • Score: 3 Thread

Maybe dark matter exists in a spatial dimension we don’t have access to or is hidden. But gravity still interacts with this mass since the gravity field spans all spatial dimensions.

Father of SQL Says Yes to NoSQL

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader shared this report from the Register:
The co-author of SQL, the standardized query language for relational databases, has come out in support of the NoSQL database movement that seeks to escape the tabular confines of the RDBMS. Speaking to The Register as SQL marks its 50th birthday, Donald Chamberlin, who first proposed the language with IBM colleague Raymond Boyce in a 1974 paper [PDF], explains that NoSQL databases and their query languages could help perform the tasks relational systems were never designed for. “The world doesn’t stay the same thing, especially in computer science,” he says. “It’s a very fast, evolving, industry. New requirements are coming along and technology has to change to meet them, I think that’s what’s happening. The NoSQL movement is motivated by new kinds of applications, particularly web applications, that need massive scalability and high performance. Relational databases were developed in an earlier generation when scalability and performance weren’t quite as important. To get the scalability and performance that you need for modern apps, many systems are relaxing some of the constraints of the relational data model.”

[…] A long-time IBMer, Chamberlin is now semi-retired, but finds time to fulfill a role as a technical advisor for NoSQL company Couchbase. In the role, he has become an advocate for a new query language designed to overcome the "impedance mismatch" between data structures in the application language and a database, he says. UC San Diego professor Yannis Papakonstantinou has proposed SQL++ to solve this problem, with a view to addressing impedance mismatch between heavily object-based JavaScript, the core language for web development and the assumed relational approach embedded in SQL. Like C++, SQL++ is designed as a compatible extension of an earlier language, SQL, but is touted as better able to handle the JSON file format inherent in JavaScript. Couchbase and AWS have adopted the language, although the cloud giant calls it PartiQL.
At the end of the interview, Chamblin adds that “I don’t think SQL is going to go away. A large part of the world’s business data is encoded in SQL, and data is very sticky. Once you’ve got your database, you’re going to leave it there. Also, relational systems do a very good job of what they were designed to do…

"[I]f you’re a startup company that wants to sell shoes on the web or something, you’re going to need a database, and one of those SQL implementations will do the job for free. I think relational databases and the SQL language will be with us for a long time.”

Meh.

By jrnvk • Score: 4, Informative Thread
The limitations of a modern relational database, when designed properly with redundancies in mind, are mostly overblown. Make no mistake, NoSQL apps are great and all, but the vast majority of applications will do just fine with an RDBMS.

AMD Core Performance Boost For Linux Getting Per-CPU Core Controls

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader shared this report from Phoronix:
For the past several months AMD Linux engineers have been working on AMD Core Performance Boost support for their P-State CPU frequency scaling driver. The ninth iteration of these patches were posted on Monday and besides the global enabling/disabling support for Core Performance Boost, it’s now possible to selectively toggle the feature on a per-CPU core basis…

The new interface is under /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/cpufreq/amd_pstate_boost_cpb for each CPU core. Thus users can tune whether particular CPU cores are boosted above the base frequency.

Is this something for non-embedded usage?

By Skinkie • Score: 3 Thread
In order to make proper use of this, I guess you would want to set CPU-affinity per process (or for a specific interrupt), balance it, and increase (or decrease) the core frequency. I wonder if there is any desktop case for such precision control.

Are Small Modular Nuclear Reactors Costly and Unviable?

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
The Royal Institution of Australia is a national non-profit hub for science communication, publishing the science magazine Cosmos four times a year.

This month they argued that small modular nuclear reactors "don’t add up as a viable energy source.”
Proponents assert that SMRs would cost less to build and thus be more affordable. However, when evaluated on the basis of cost per unit of power capacity, SMRs will actually be more expensive than large reactors. This ‘diseconomy of scale’ was demonstrated by the now-terminated proposal to build six NuScale Power SMRs (77 megawatts each) in Idaho in the United States. The final cost estimate of the project per megawatt was around 250 percent more than the initial per megawatt cost for the 2,200 megawatts Vogtle nuclear power plant being built in Georgia, US. Previous small reactors built in various parts of America also shut down because they were uneconomical.
The cost was four to six times the cost of the same electricity from wind and solar photovoltaic plants, according to estimates from the Australian Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation and the Australian Energy Market Operator. “The money invested in nuclear energy would save far more carbon dioxide if it were instead invested in renewables,” the article agues:
Small reactors also raise all of the usual concerns associated with nuclear power, including the risk of severe accidents, the linkage to nuclear weapons proliferation, and the production of radioactive waste that has no demonstrated solution because of technical and social challenges. One 2022 study calculated that various radioactive waste streams from SMRs would be larger than the corresponding waste streams from existing light water reactors…

Nuclear energy itself has been declining in importance as a source of power: the fraction of the world’s electricity supplied by nuclear reactors has declined from a maximum of 17.5 percent in 1996 down to 9.2 percent in 2022. All indications suggest that the trend will continue if not accelerate. The decline in the global share of nuclear power is driven by poor economics: generating power with nuclear reactors is costly compared to other low-carbon, renewable sources of energy and the difference between these costs is widening.
Thanks to Slashdot reader ZipNada for sharing the article.

Re:Sorry

By Valgrus Thunderaxe • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
You should be thanking the communists for bringing the cost of solar down to pennies on the dollar. It certainly wasn’t capitalists that had any interest in that.

Re:Math

By drinkypoo • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

They never talk about long term operating cost, longevity of the plant without extensive extraordinary maintenance, safety, skill required to build and maintain, or anything else of importance and necessary to determine the true ROI and value of big projects.

Why would increasing the number of units ever help with any of these things? No one has ever explained why that even might be true. They simply claim that mass production will improve the situation because it did for other things which are very different from nuclear reactors.

Australian politics at play

By Macfox • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

The conservative (LNP) party who are behind the latest push for SMR’s, were in government from 2013-2022 and strongly opposed any nuclear power generation.

Since losing government their leader Peter Dutton has taken a keen interest in SMR’s as a path forward for Australia to transition from fossil fuel (coal and gas) base load power generation. The key issue is, Australia’s coal power plants are being retired now. The fossil fuel industry is pushing the SMR pipedream (via the LNP), knowing SMR’s are years off (if practical), as it will extend the dependence on gas.

LNP hasn’t provided any plan or policy detail other than a pamphlet and a few slides. Yet the MSM media continue to give this nonsense idea oxygen, despite various experts and reports dismissing it as unproven, too expensive, slow to build and multiple times more costly to operate per MW.

Australia is blessed with ample space and abundant sunshine, wind, where renewable’s provided 40% of the total power in 2023. By 2030, that will reach close to 80% (current target). Gas will have a part, but only for dispatchable power generation. The idea that it will be a major source of power generation fanciful, given how expensive gas is in Australia.

While Australia is the 2nd largest LNG exporter, local gas is expensive. For most of Australia, there is no local reservation policy, meaning producers charge locals global prices, thus making gas power generation a very lucrative proposition for the gas cartel, hence their drive to stifle moves to renewable’s.

Talk of SMR has been playing out for months in Australian politics. With any luck RAI and CSIRO reports will finally put it to bed.

Re:Storage

By Stephan Schulz • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

>“The money invested in nuclear energy would save far more carbon dioxide if it were instead invested in renewables,”

But they are not doing the same job unless they also include storage. Plus the output could still be inconsistent if generation was too low for too long (due to not enough storage or freaky weather). And if that storage is lithium batteries, you have to add in all that life cycle carbon, as well.

To quote from the article: “In comparison, the cost of each megawatt-hour of electricity from wind and solar photovoltaic plants is around AUD$100 [as opposed to AUD$400-600 for SMRs], even after accounting for the cost involved in balancing the variability of output from solar and wind plants." (emphasis added by me).

Re:Math

By XXongo • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Quick summary of conversation:

iAmWaySmarterThanYou: this summary is too simplistic, it doesn’t give details. I want details.

AC: there are plenty of details in the link given

iAmWaySmarterThanYou: I’m too lazy to read the links. I want a simplistic summary.

Former Boeing Quality Inspector Turns Whistleblower, Says Plane Parts Had Serious Defects

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Thursday the BBC reported:
Plane bodies made by Boeing’s largest supplier regularly left the factory with serious defects, according to a former quality inspector at the firm. Santiago Paredes who worked for Spirit AeroSystems in Kansas, told the BBC he often found up to 200 defects on parts being readied for shipping to Boeing. He was nicknamed “showstopper” for slowing down production when he tried to tackle his concerns, he claimed.

Spirit said it “strongly disagree[d]" with the allegations. “We are vigorously defending against his claims,” said a spokesperson for Spirit, which remains Boeing’s largest supplier.

Mr Paredes made the allegations against Spirit in an exclusive interview with the BBC and the American network CBS, in which he described what he said he experienced while working at the firm between 2010 and 2022… “I was finding a lot of missing fasteners, a lot of bent parts, sometimes even missing parts....” Mr Paredes told the BBC that some of the defects he identified while at Spirit were minor — but others were more serious. He also claimed he was put under pressure to be less rigorous…

He now maintains he would be reluctant to fly on a 737 Max, in case it still carried flaws that originated in the Wichita factory. “I’d never met a lot of people who were scared of flying until I worked at Spirit,” he said. “And then, being at Spirit, I met a lot of people who were afraid of flying — because they saw how they were building the fuselages.”
“If quality mattered, I would still be at Spirit,” Paredes told CBS News, speaking publicly for the first time.
CBS News spoke with several current and former Spirit AeroSystems employees and reviewed photos of dented fuselages, missing fasteners and even a wrench they say was left behind in a supposedly ready-to-deliver component. Paredes said Boeing knew for years Spirit was delivering defective fuselages.
It could be just a coincidence, but the same day, the Associated Press ran story with this headline.

"Boeing plane carrying 85 people catches fire and skids off the runway in Senegal, injuring 10.”
It was the third incident involving a Boeing airplane this week. Also on Thursday, 190 people were safely evacuated from a plane in Turkey after one of its tires burst during landing at a southern airport, Turkey’s transportation ministry said.

Money makes the monkey dance

By Savage-Rabbit • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Santiago Paredes who worked for Spirit AeroSystems in Kansas, told the BBC he often found up to 200 defects on parts being readied for shipping to Boeing. He was nicknamed “showstopper” for slowing down production when he tried to tackle his concerns, he claimed.

This sums up in a sentence, why ‘self regulation by industry’ doesn’t work int he absence of outside followup and penalties for slacking off. There’s always some greedy asshole who thinks it’s a good idea increase profits in the short term by wrecking a reputation for quality built up over multiple decades of hard engineering work. Handing out nicknames like ‘showstopper’ to QA inspectors doesn’t just speak volumes about the rank stupidity of the management this that advocates such a policy. It also indicates that a number of regular Boeing workers signed up to this idea as well if they were spitting this pejorative nickname after Paredes and other QA inspectors whenever they walked by. I suppose there is truth to the old proverb: ‘Money makes the monkey dance”.

Boeing’s management…

By VeryFluffyBunny • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
…have well & truly f**ked the company. Will they ever recover from this? Who’ll go to jail? How can they restore public confidence & the confidence of the people who decide which aircraft to buy/lease?

As usual, the c-suite will probably be OK & move on to other jobs, while the workers, who were forced into this situation, will have to suffer the consequences. Don’t you just love capitalism & all its glorious idiosyncrasies, perverse incentives, & lack of culpability?

Re:Boeing’s management…

By ShanghaiBill • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Who’ll go to jail?

Nobody.

If you want to put people in jail for stupidity and incompetence, you’ll need to build a lot more jails.

The decisions that killed people were the lack of redundant sensors on the 737MAX and skimping on pilot training, both of which were approved by the FAA.

Re: Sounds disgruntled

By piojo • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Do you know what disgruntled means?

It means his employer stopped gruntling him.

Re: Boeing’s management…

By madbrain • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Criminal negligence is a thing. That seems to apply in this case.

The World’s Largest Vaccuum to Suck Climate Pollution From the Air Just Began Operating

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader shared this report from CNN:
The “world’s largest” plant designed to suck planet-heating pollution out of the atmosphere like a giant vacuum began operating in Iceland on Wednesday. “Mammoth” is the second commercial direct air capture plant opened by Swiss company Climeworks in the country, and is 10 times bigger than its predecessor, Orca, which started running in 2021… Climeworks plans to transport the carbon underground where it will be naturally transformed into stone, locking up the carbon permanently… The whole operation will be powered by Iceland’s abundant, clean geothermal energy....

Climeworks started building Mammoth in June 2022, and the company says it is the world’s largest such plant. It has a modular design with space for 72 "collector containers" — the vacuum parts of the machine that capture carbon from the air — which can be stacked on top of each other and moved around easily. There are currently 12 of these in place with more due to be added over the next few months. Mammoth will be able to pull 36,000 tons of carbon from the atmosphere a year at full capacity, according to Climeworks. That’s equivalent to taking around 7,800 gas-powered cars off the road for a year…

All the carbon removal equipment in the world is only capable of removing around 0.01 million metric tons of carbon a year, a far cry from the 70 million tons a year needed by 2030 to meet global climate goals, according to the International Energy Agency [7,000x more]… Jan Wurzbacher, the company’s co-founder and co-CEO, said Mammoth is just the latest stage in Climeworks’ plan to scale up to 1 million tons of carbon removal a year by 2030 and 1 billion tons by 2050. Plans include potential DAC plants in Kenya and the United States.

Re:Words mean things

By sjames • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

It is when there is too much of it in the wrong place.

Plastic bottle on store shelf full of product = not pollution. Same bottle, empty, floating on an otherwise scenic lake = pollution.

It’s MegaMaid!

By ZenShadow • Score: 5, Funny Thread

She’s gone from suck to blow!

Good experiment, too early to implement

By Baron_Yam • Score: 5, Informative Thread

We do need to test the tech, but we shouldn’t be implementing it at scale yet.

We release carbon to extract stored chemical energy. That energy must be returned to sequester carbon. For either direction, some energy is ‘lost’, not used for the purpose we intend it for.

The math is irrefutable - it would reduce atmospheric carbon more if this green energy was used to power whatever we want to power than to let those uses burn fossil fuels while this machine tries to clean up after them.

We’re still releasing more CO2 every year despite increasing our green energy production. That must stop, and reverse. When essentially all our energy production is ‘green’ and there’s some left over, THAT is when it is time for sequestration to start.

Re:Words mean things

By dvice • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

That is quite interesting definition. Because
1. Without CO2, plants would die and with the plants, all of the life, so it is essential molecule for life.
2. More CO2 will improve plant life, so it does have also positive effects.
3. Anything is harmful if there is too much of it, and there is too much CO2 (even the plants suffer from the heating effects of it)

So CO2 is considered pollution only because there is so much of it, not because of what it is. So by definition, CO2 as a molecule is not a pollution in itself, but huge amount of CO2 is a pollution.

Re:Words mean things

By Rei • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

1) Alle Dinge sind Gift, und nichts ist ohne Gift; allein die Dosis macht, dass ein Ding kein Gift ist.

2) Increasing CO2 levels does help plants, via reducing photorespiration per unit carbon fixed. Not, however, as much as killing them with worsened weather harms them (in particular; a warming client sees the monsoon belts move poleward, dries out soil faster, makes rivers more seasonal, and increases the intensity of peak rain events - aka, both drought and flood become more common). Plants also have optimal cultivation temperatures, and most are C3 plants, which tend to not like hot weather. Higher temperatures make them less efficient, and again, to a greater degree than CO2 helps them. C4 plants are generally better at dealing with drought and higher temperatures, but they don’t benefit as much from increased CO2 availability, as they’re already so good at capturing CO2 and could grow in CO2 levels a tiny fraction of that which we have now.

3) This is a bizarre argument. So, say, if I dump tonnes of cobalt in your drinking water, that’s not pollution, because the human body needs to consume billionths of a gram per day? Some bacteria produce energy from oxidizing arsenic or using arsenic compounds to conduct photosynthesis - you okay with me contaminating your food supply with it? Some bacteria consume uranium - okay for me to fill your air with uranium dust?

The post you’re responding to is literally quoting the dictionary.

Google Employees Question Execs Over ‘Decline in Morale’ After Blowout Earnings

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“Google’s business is growing at its fastest rate in two years,” reports CNBC, “and a blowout earnings report in April sparked the biggest rally in Alphabet shares since 2015, pushing the company’s market cap past $2 trillion.

“But at an all-hands meeting last week with CEO Sundar Pichai and CFO Ruth Porat, employees were more focused on why that performance isn’t translating into higher pay, and how long the company’s cost-cutting measures are going to be in place.”
“We’ve noticed a significant decline in morale, increased distrust and a disconnect between leadership and the workforce,” a comment posted on an internal forum ahead of the meeting read. “How does leadership plan to address these concerns and regain the trust, morale and cohesion that have been foundational to our company’s success?”

Google is using artificial intelligence to summarize employee comments and questions for the forum.

Alphabet’s top leadership has been on the defensive for the past few years, as vocal staffers have railed about post-pandemic return-to-office mandates, the company’s cloud contracts with the military, fewer perks and an extended stretch of layoffs — totaling more than 12,000 last year — along with other cost cuts that began when the economy turned in 2022. Employees have also complained about a lack of trust and demands that they work on tighter deadlines with fewer resources and diminished opportunities for internal advancement.

The internal strife continues despite Alphabet’s better-than-expected first-quarter earnings report, in which the company also announced its first dividend as well as a $70 billion buyback. “Despite the company’s stellar performance and record earnings, many Googlers have not received meaningful compensation increases” a top-rated employee question read. “When will employee compensation fairly reflect the company’s success and is there a conscious decision to keep wages lower due to a cooling employment market?”

Re:Greed

By denny_deluxe • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
So employees wanting their fair share of the profit they generated for management is ‘greedy’ now? Human Resources has spoken.

Re:Of course!

By Brain-Fu • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

I mostly agree with you.

On the one hand, employer’s attitude to compensation is “pay what the market requires, and no more.” How well they have lined their pockets has nothing to do with what their people are paid, they pay market rates and maybe a bit above to retain the VIPs, and that’s it. And they feel their employees are being uppity with this totally inappropriate demand that the company owners should share their wealth with the workers.

On the other hand, employees MUST push for higher compensation, consistently, or they will receive nothing more than table scraps. The only force that pushes their salaries up is their refusal to stay loyal to companies when others are willing to pay more to poach them. So, a conversation like this is a good starting point, but that’s all it is. Either they union up or they shop around for a higher salary and walk as soon as they get it. That’s how employees take what they deserve.

It might not be cause for joy that everyone must constantly fight for what they deserve. But seeking one’s own best interest is simply human nature. That’s never going to change. If you removed every leader at Google and replaced them with anyone else (assuming they had sufficient education to competently lead a business of this size, and hence not run it straight into the ground) you will see the new leaders behave exactly like the old ones, because they have exactly the same incentives. That’s just the way it is. All anyone can do is figure out how to make the best of it.

I do agree that we need to keep businesses regulated. Regulation is necessary to protect the freedom of the market. Without regulation, monopolies and cartels dominate and ruin absolutely everything. But (and this is the only point where I disagree with the OP), that doesn’t mean that all businesses should be so thoroughly regulated that they are effectively state-owned. We cannot completely destroy the profit incentive, because that incentive is the means by which we get the services and technological advances we want. A balance must be struck, and that means giving as well as taking.

Talk to the AI hand.

By geekmux • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

So, valued employees raise a valid question about how and why morale is in the shitter while the company wins bigger than ever, and management responds with:

Google is using artificial intelligence to summarize employee comments and questions for the forum.

Here’s a thought Google. How about you act a bit more fucking human in your response here. Having a machine even summarize a very human problem is probably one of the reasons morale is in the shitter.

Meatsack bosses who act like this deserve to have their talent pool rug rapidly pulled out from under them via attrition.

Re:Greed

By timeOday • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
So you think a person doing a job for one company should be paid less than somebody doing the same job for a different company based on how much profit either company makes? Or that you should pay your employer to work if they lose money that year?

That’s not how pay works. It is how equity works, though, so if that’s the situation you want to be in, go ahead and use you paycheck to purchase stock in your employer. It can pay off, or not.

Tech workers are going to need to unionize

By rsilvergun • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
We’ve had a very good run because of all the startups but the big tech companies are buying out and shutting down the startups long before they can employ very many people. They’re all so colluding to keep wages low and to bring in as much cheap overseas labor as possible.

We cannot directly bargain with multi-billionaires strategizing against us at country clubs. They have vastly more resources than we do. It’s the old thing where you can break an arrow easily but a bunch of arrows can’t be broken.

A hard part is when you work an IT you talk to idiots all day long and it’s easy to get a really really really really really big head. It doesn’t matter how smart you are though if somebody was more money and power uses that to come down on you like a ton of bricks. The smartest man in the world still dies if you shoot him

Red Hat (and CIQ) Offer Extend Support for RHEL 7 (and CentOS 7)

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
This week, The Register reported:
If you are still running RHEL 7, which is now approaching a decade old, there’s good news. Red Hat is offering four more years of support for RHEL 7.9, which it terms Extended Life Cycle Support or ELS.

If you are running the free version, CentOS Linux 7, that hits its end-of-life on the same date: June 30, 2024. CIQ, which offers CentOS Linux rebuild Rocky Linux, has a life cycle extension for that too, which it calls CIQ Bridge. The company told The Reg: “CIQ Bridge, essentially a long-term support service tailored for CentOS 7 users on the migration path to Rocky Linux, is offered under an annual, fixed-rate subscription. CIQ Bridge includes access to CentOS 7 extended life package updates for an additional three years and security updates for CVSS 7 issues and above. Security updates for CVSS 5 and 6 are available at an elevated subscription tier. CIQ Bridge is designed to support CentOS 7 users until they are ready for CIQ guidance and support in migration to Rocky Linux.” CIQ believes there’s a substantial market for this, and points to research from Enlyft that suggests hundreds of thousands of users still on CentOS Linux 7.

Hooray

By OrangeTide • Score: 3 Thread

I mean I spent a significant amount of time last year trying to wrangle alternatives to CentOS and RHEL 7 for my customers. But great news, I can tell the last one to buy an ELS and leave me alone. RH was dead set on killing this stuff off shortly after they bought CentOS.

RHEL (and Rocky and Alma Linux) 9.4 Released - Plus AI Offerings

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.4 has been released. But also released is Rocky Linux 9.4, reports 9to5Linux:
Rocky Linux 9.4 also adds openSUSE’s KIWI next-generation appliance builder as a new image build workflow and process for building images that are feature complete with the old images… Under the hood, Rocky Linux 9.4 includes the same updated components from the upstream Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.4
This week also saw the release of Alma Linux 9.4 stable (the “forever-free enterprise Linux distribution… binary compatible with RHEL.”) The Register points out that while Alma Linux is “still supporting some aging hardware that the official RHEL 9.4 drops, what’s new is largely the same in them both.”

And last week also saw the launch of the AlmaLinux High-Performance Computing and AI Special Interest Group (SIG). HPCWire reports:
“AlmaLinux’s status as a community-driven enterprise Linux holds incredible promise for the future of HPC and AI,” said Hayden Barnes, SIG leader and Senior Open Source Community Manager for AI Software at HPE. “Its transparency and stability empowers researchers, developers and organizations to collaborate, customize and optimize their computing environments, fostering a culture of innovation and accelerating breakthroughs in scientific research and cutting-edge AI/ML.”
And this week, InfoWorld reported:
Red Hat has launched Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI), described as a foundation model platform that allows users to more seamlessly develop and deploy generative AI models. Announced May 7 and available now as a developer preview, RHEL AI includes the Granite family of open-source large language models (LLMs) from IBM, InstructLab model alignment tools based on the LAB (Large-Scale Alignment for Chatbots) methodology, and a community-driven approach to model development through the InstructLab project, Red Hat said.

THANK YOU JEEBUS

By Rei • Score: 3 Thread

Red Hat has launched Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI), described as a foundation model platform that allows users to more seamlessly develop and deploy generative AI models.

Hopefully whatever they do there will rub off on Fedora. It’s always a massive pain to get setup…not least of which because NVidia usually develops one or two GCC versions behind (and you can’t use incompatible versions with nvcc), and by the time they’re caught up, the distro is already end-of-life.

AlmaLinux “generic cloud” image

By Tailhook • Score: 3 Thread

For some reason the “generic cloud” image for AlmaLinux 9.4 is missing: the latest available is 9.3. Can’t tell if it’s been been obsoleted and you’re supposed to use something else or if it’s just not ready yet. Anyone know?

The People Who Won’t Give Up Floppy Disks

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Slashdot reader quonset writes:
The last floppy disk was manufactured in 2011. Despite no new supplies being available for over a decade, there are still people, and organizations, who rely on floppy disks. Each has their own story as to why they rely on what is essentially 1970s technology.
From the BBC:
Tom Persky, a US businessman, has been selling “new”, as in, unopened, floppy disks for years and still finds the trade lucrative. He runs Floppydisk.com, which offers disks for about US$1 (£0.80) each, though some higher capacity versions cost up to US$10 (£8) per disk, he says. Persky has customers all over the world and you could split them roughly 50-50 into hobbyists and enthusiasts like Espen Kraft on one side, and industrial users on the other. This latter category encompasses people who use computers at work that require floppy disks to function. They are, essentially, locked in to a format that the rest of the world has largely forgotten.

“I sell thousands of floppy disks to the airline industry, still,” says Persky. He declines to elaborate. “Companies are not happy about when I talk about them.” But it is well-known that some Boeing 747s, for example, use floppy disks to load critical software updates into their navigation and avionics computers. While these older aircraft might not be so common in Europe or the US these days, you might find one in the developing world, for instance, Persky hints. There are also pieces of factory equipment, government systems — or even animatronic figures — that still rely on floppy disks.

And in San Francisco, the Muni Metro light railway, which launched in 1980, won’t start up each morning unless the staff in charge pick up a floppy disk and slip it into the computer that controls the railway’s Automatic Train Control System, or ATCS. “The computer has to be told what it’s supposed to do every day,” explains a spokesman for the San Francisco Municipal Transport Agency (SFMTA). “Without a hard drive, there is nowhere to install software on a permanent basis.”

This computer has to be restarted in such a way repeatedly, he adds — it can’t simply be left on, for fear of its memory degrading.
The article also includes this quote from a cybersecurity expert at Pen Test Partners. “If floppy was the only interface, the only way to get malware on to [the computer] would be via said floppy disk. That’s quite a limiting factor for the attacker…”

again and again....

By Vomitgod • Score: 5, Informative Thread
https://hardware.slashdot.org/…

https://hardware.slashdot.org/…

Re:We have had floppy disk emulators for years

By Scutter • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

You think the people who won’t pay to upgrade their system to something more modern are going to pay for an emulator? They’re just going to run it into the ground and then yell at their I.T. guy (who has been warning them for years).

From the first link

By buck-yar • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The slow death of the “floppy” or “diskette” began in 1998 when Apple decided not to include a floppy drive in its G3 iMac computer.

Hardly anyone had Apple computers. It was the CD-ROM. Games stopped being sold on a stack of 1.44mb and instead came on CD-ROM. The widespread adaption of the CD-ROM burners around 2000 put the nail in the casket.

Re:We have had floppy disk emulators for years

By ArchieBunker • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

More like “Hey sign your name to this form guaranteeing this emulator is 100% perfect and won’t ever crash a jumbo jet”.

Re:We have had floppy disk emulators for years

By geekmux • Score: 5, Informative Thread

More like “Hey sign your name to this form guaranteeing this emulator is 100% perfect and won’t ever crash a jumbo jet”.

Pretty sure Boeing has confirmed you don’t need a floppy disc emulator to do that.

Could Stem Cells One Day Cure Diabetes?

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Brian Shelton’s type 1 diabetes was treated with an infusion of insulin-producing pancreas cells (grown from stem cells). In 2021, the New York Times reported:
Now his body automatically controls its insulin and blood sugar levels. Shelton, now 64, may be the first person cured of the disease with a new treatment that has experts daring to hope that help may be coming for many of the 1.5 million Americans suffering from Type 1 diabetes. “It’s a whole new life,” Shelton said. Diabetes experts were astonished but urged caution. The study is continuing and will take five years, involving 17 people with Type 1 diabetes.
“By fall 2023, three patients, including Shelton, had achieved insulin independence by day 180 post-transplant,” MedScape reported (in January of 2024):
In the phase 1/2 study, 14 patients with type 1 diabetes and impaired hypoglycemia awareness or recurrent hypoglycemia received portal vein infusions of VX-880 [Vertex Pharmaceutical’s pancreatic islet cell replacement therapy] along with standard immunosuppression. As of the last data cut, all 14 patients demonstrated islet cell engraftment and production of endogenous insulin. After more than 90 days of follow-up, 13 of the patients have achieved A1c levels < 7% without using exogenous insulin.
Brian Shelton and another patient died, and while Vertex says their deaths were unrelated to the treatment, they have “placed the study on a protocol-specified pause, pending review of the totality of the data by the independent data monitoring committee and global regulators.” (MedScape adds that Vertex “is continuing with a phase 1/2 clinical trial of a different product, VX-264, which encapsulates the same VX-880 cells in a device designed to eliminate the need for immunosuppression.”)

And meanwhile, a new study in China (again using stem cell-derived islet tissue) has provided “encouraging evidence that islet tissue replacement is an effective cure for diabetic patients,” the researchers wrote in Nature. The treatment was administered to 59-year-old, type-2 diabetic.

“Marked changes in the patient’s glycemic control were observed as early as week 2,” the researchers write, and after week 32, the patient’s Time In Tight Range (TITR) “had readily reached 99% and was maintained thereafter.”

Thanks to long-time Slashdot reader hackingbear for sharing the news.

Not like this, no

By backslashdot • Score: 3 Thread

The two paths (currently) most viable to cure dabetes:

1. Encapsulated beta cells.
2. Tolerogenic vaccination PLUS beta cell transplant

Just transplanting stem cells and broad immunosuppression is dumb.

Lightweight Dillo Browser Resurrected: TLS But No JavaScript

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
The Dillo browser dates back to 1999, writes the Register, with its own rendering engine. And now Dillo “has returned with a new release, version 3.1.

“It’s nearly nine years after version 3.05 appeared on the last day of June 2015.”
Version 3.1 incorporates dozens of fixes and improvements, as the official announcement describes.

Project lead Rodrigo Arias Mallo announced his resurrection attempt on Hacker News early this year. He has taken the last available code from the project’s Mercurial repository, incorporated about 25 outstanding fixes, and added as many again of his own.

Dillo is a super-lightweight graphical web browser for Unix-like OSes, written using the Fast Light Toolkit. The latest version has a number of new features, although one of the most significant is support for Transport Layer Security. TLS is the successor to SSL, with a Microsoft-approved name. Dillo 3.1 supports it thanks to the Mbed-TLS library.
It doesn’t support frames, embedded media playback, or JavaSccript — but it can run on very low-end hardware…

Thanks to Lproven (Slashdot reader #6,030) for sharing the news.

Also see

By tirnacopu • Score: 4, Informative Thread
the list in https://wiki.archlinux.org/tit… from my tests, NetSurf is the closest comparison; also (almost) no JavaScript, but full modern TLS.

Made useless by “anti-bot” technology

By xack • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
Thanks to Cloudflare, recaptcha, hcaptcha and other “are you a human” technology niche browsers have been an unfortunate casualty as modern sites use so much JavaScript and fingerprinting to make sure a real human is on the other end, despite the fact that human emulation is getting better everyday. I’ve had to stop using Waterfox and go back to Firefox because of this, even Firefox gets seen as non human by many sites, everyone wants you drinking the Chrome-aid. I’ve tried hundreds of browsers over my 25 years of using the internet, and I’ve seen over 95% of them die.

Re:Also see

By anonymouscoward52236 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

How many people looked at the home page and were like “Lightweight Dildo Browser”?

And I hope

By jmccue • Score: 3 Thread
And I hope dillo never uses Javascript. It is one of the reasons I still use it. Congratulations to the team!

Dillo vs. LiteHTML

By markdavis • Score: 5, Informative Thread

We used Dillo a long time ago for internal rendering of some stuff for thin clients.

A few years ago, the Fancy html renderer under Claws Mail became not obtainable, and we tried to switch to Dillo, and it was a disaster. Worked great in testing. Then when we rolled it out on a multiuser application server, we discovered it doesn’t work correctly multiuser (at least with the Claws plugin) and switched to LightHTML engine plugin which works even better than Dillo. It, too, doesn’t support javascript, but I think it also doesn’t support TLS. Anyway, it is an interesting project that has been getting updates:

http://www.litehtml.com/
https://github.com/litehtml/li…

and also has its own stand-alone mini-browser (litebrowser):

https://github.com/litehtml/li…

NASA’s Plan To Build a Levitating Robot Train on the Moon

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“Does a levitating robot train on the moon sound far-fetched?” asks LiveScience.

“NASA doesn’t seem to think so, as the agency has just greenlit further funding for a study looking into the concept.”
The project, called “Flexible Levitation on a Track” (FLOAT), has been moved to phase two of NASA’s Innovative Advanced Concepts program (NIAC) , which aims to develop “science fiction-like” projects for future space exploration. The FLOAT project could result in materials being transported across the moon’s surface as soon as the 2030s, according to the agency… According to NASA’s initial design, FLOAT will consist of magnetic robots levitating over a three-layer film track to reduce abrasion from dust on the lunar surface. Carts will be mounted on these robots and will move at roughly 1 mph (1.61 km/h). They could transport roughly 100 tons (90 metric tons) of material a day to and from NASA’s future lunar base.
“A durable, long-life robotic transport system will be critical to the daily operations of a sustainable lunar base in the 2030’s,” according to NASA’s blog post, arguing it could be used to

Thanks to long-time Slashdot reader AmiMoJo for sharing the article.


Robots

By backslashdot • Score: 3 Thread

Robot technology sucks so we’ll never be able to build or assemble this sort of thing on the moon. And even if we did build it, we won’t be able to mine anything on the moon. Mining on the moon is impossible, we’re not going to have astronauts working as miners that’s too ridiculous.

FLOAT

By RitchCraft • Score: 4, Funny Thread

“Flexible Levitation on a Track” (FLOAT) - How do I get a job at the government acronym lab? Working their sounds like fun!

Re:FLOAT

By Anonymous Coward • Score: 4, Funny Thread
First, you need to be able to correctly use there, their, and they’re.

Re:Levitating Train Moon Base

By HiThere • Score: 4 Thread

Why do it that way. A horizontal wheel on an axle is easier. you could levitate just the bearing joint. Getting on and off would be tricky, though, as you wouldn’t want to stop it. (That’s a lot of momentum to play with.)

OTOH, in a good vacuum, levitated trains may make more sense. You still need to guard against heat loss in the superconducting magnets, but it should be a lot easier. (A good sun-shade and insulating legs should almost be enough.)

Re:How about we build some trains here first?

By DrMrLordX • Score: 4, Informative Thread

This proposed train travels at 1 mph and is for cargo. We have terrestrial cargo trains that haul more at higher speeds, and have since the 19th century.

‘Hunt For Gollum’ Short on YouTube Survives New Peter Jackson Movie Announcement

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Thursday CNN reported:
The Oscar-winning team behind the nearly $6 billion blockbuster “Lord of the Rings” and “The Hobbit” trilogies is reuniting to produce two new films. The first of the new projects from Sir Peter Jackson, Fran Walsh and Philippa Boyens is tentatively titled “Lord of the Rings: The Hunt for Gollum,” Warner Bros. Discovery announced Thursday. It will be directed by “LOTR” alum Andy Serkis.
But “amid the news,” TMZ reports, “a famous short film about it got yanked … only to be revived on YouTube a day later.”
A viral short film called “The Hunt for Gollum” — which got uploaded to YouTube about 15 years ago — has been praised among Tolkien fans for years as a stellar piece of fan fiction and art, which while not sanctioned by Warner Bros., still held its own and looked damn good. On Thursday, WB announced they were making a brand new installment to their film franchise with the same title — which led to the short being taken down on a copyright claim … but it seems Warner has backed off, ‘cause about 12 hours or so later, it’s up again…!

Sources with direct knowledge tell us the copyright claim got applied in error … and the studio realized that, so they removed it and YouTube did their thing. The director of the short, Chris Bouchard, uploaded an email he got from YT saying the copyright claim had been released … confirming WB retreated all on their own. He tells TMZ … “We’re just happy to hear folks remembered our film somewhat fondly, low-fi effort that it is. And grateful as of course fan films are in strange legal territory.”

fan films are in strange legal territory

By kaldari • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

… only because we let movie studios like Disney and WB extend copyright terms to absurdly long periods. Lord of the Rings is 70 years old and Tolkien has been dead for over 50 years. It should be fair game at this point to make fan fiction about it.

So the studio figured it out

By localroger • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
The only surprising thing here is that the studio did figure it out. It probably took twelve hours for one of the lawyers who knew what a shitstorm of trouble they were about to get in to find the right executive and convince them to back off. There is no copyrighted work to infringe here, except — I am not making this up — the fan video. There is no Tolkien story to infringe whether you own a blanket rights package to his works or not. You cannot copyright a name like “Gollum” or an idea like “let’s tell a story about looking for Gollum after the trilogy.” You can only copyright the expression of an idea, that is an actual, completed story. Tolkien never wrote such a story, and neither has the studio. Guess who has? The fan video guy. He doesn’t even have to have registered it. In the US copyright issues upon creation of the work. Registration just gives you the right to countersue for punitive as well as actual damages. The studio was setting itself up for a massive, embarrassing loss if it pursued this even one more millimeter. It’s a stark reminder that these multimillion dollar corporations do not, in fact, own everything (at least not yet). And that is exactly the sort of reminder those corporations probably do not want to drag out in front of a bunch of TV cameras, ever.

Did OpenAI, Google and Meta ‘Cut Corners’ to Harvest AI Training Data?

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot
What happened when OpenAI ran out of English-language training data in 2021?

They just created a speech recognition tool that could transcribe the audio from YouTube videos, reports The New York Times, as part of an investigation arguing that tech companies “including OpenAI, Google and Meta have cut corners, ignored corporate policies and debated bending the law” in their search for AI training data. [Alternate URL here.]
Some OpenAI employees discussed how such a move might go against YouTube’s rules, three people with knowledge of the conversations said. YouTube, which is owned by Google, prohibits use of its videos for applications that are “independent” of the video platform. Ultimately, an OpenAI team transcribed more than 1 million hours of YouTube videos, the people said. The team included Greg Brockman, OpenAI’s president, who personally helped collect the videos, two of the people said. The texts were then fed into a system called GPT-4…

At Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram, managers, lawyers and engineers last year discussed buying the publishing house Simon & Schuster to procure long works, according to recordings of internal meetings obtained by the Times. They also conferred on gathering copyrighted data from across the internet, even if that meant facing lawsuits. Negotiating licenses with publishers, artists, musicians and the news industry would take too long, they said.

Like OpenAI, Google transcribed YouTube videos to harvest text for its AI models, five people with knowledge of the company’s practices said. That potentially violated the copyrights to the videos, which belong to their creators. Last year, Google also broadened its terms of service. One motivation for the change, according to members of the company’s privacy team and an internal message viewed by the Times, was to allow Google to be able to tap publicly available Google Docs, restaurant reviews on Google Maps and other online material for more of its AI products…

Some Google employees were aware that OpenAI had harvested YouTube videos for data, two people with knowledge of the companies said. But they didn’t stop OpenAI because Google had also used transcripts of YouTube videos to train its AI models, the people said. That practice may have violated the copyrights of YouTube creators. So if Google made a fuss about OpenAI, there might be a public outcry against its own methods, the people said.
The article adds that some tech companies are now even developing “synthetic” information to train AI.

“This is not organic data created by humans, but text, images and code that AI models produce — in other words, the systems learn from what they themselves generate.”

What a weird way to pronounce

By memory_register • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Theft.

Re:What a weird way to pronounce

By quonset • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Theft.

How is it theft? Nothing was taken? The original was still there, untouched.

Shocked

By david.emery • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

I’m Shocked, Shocked to hear that tech companies bent the rules to get ahead of their competition (and then hid it.)

  But just wait until LLMs start training each other. Garbage In, Amplified Garbage Out.

Re:What a weird way to pronounce

By EvilSS • Score: 4, Funny Thread
Piracy is theft.... when it’s them and not us doing it.

Re: What a weird way to pronounce

By guruevi • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

It is not theft. It is copyright infringement at best but even that is stretching the concept as long as you cannot trick the system into verbatim regurgitating its contents. You published your content publicly, this was the intention of Google all along and started with Project Gutenberg, Google News etc. OpenAI is just a spinoff of the idea and very much came out of that same cadre of people.