Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Amazon In Talks To Buy AI Startup Decart For Around $7 Billion
  2. Q3 2026 Was Historically Bad For PC Shipments
  3. Should We Beware of Other License Plate Surveillance Companies Besides Flock?
  4. How the US Nuclear Plant Fleet Is Leaning Into AI
  5. Let’s Encrypt to Cut SSL Certificate Lifetimes to 64 Days in February 2027
  6. Game Console Market Craters: Xbox and PS5 Sales Plummet Over 25%
  7. Research Firm Calls Anthropic’s Upcoming IPO ‘Unprecedented Test of Investor Gullibity’
  8. Gas Cars Fall Below 50% of Global New Car Sales for the First Time
  9. ‘The Social Reckoning’ Bombs with $5.5 Million Opening
  10. Blade Runner, Star Trek, Godzilla, Star Wars + Marvel (and Legos): News From New York Comic-Con
  11. A College Told Flock to Remove Its Cameras. The Company Refused.
  12. Original RFC1149 Packet Up For Auction At Christies
  13. US Agency To Rewrite Rules To Finally Address Vehicle Headlight Glare
  14. NASA Releases Data from Artemis II Moon Mission, Calls It ‘Sights and Sounds of Science’
  15. FBI Arrests Cybersecurity Executive Over Data Breach After Contractor Fails to Update Oracle HR Platform

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Amazon In Talks To Buy AI Startup Decart For Around $7 Billion

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Amazon is reportedly in talks to acquire AI startup Decart in a deal that could value the company at up to $7 billion. Decart’s DOS software helps developers optimize AI models for different processors in weeks rather than months, a capability that could be particularly useful to AWS as it pushes its own Trainium chips. SiliconANGLE reports:
The company has developed software called DOS, which can help developers to speed up AI training and inference workloads by optimizing their neural networks to run on a specific processor. In most AI workloads, developers must optimize a neural network for the chip they plan to run it on. This process used to take months, but with DOS, the workflow necessary to do this can be compressed into just a couple of weeks. As a result, companies can use Decart’s software to shift AI workloads to different processors if their requirements change, or if chip availability becomes an issue.

In addition to DOS, Decart is also a model developer, responsible for creating the Lucy and Oasis world models, which are designed to generate and simulate realistic three-dimensional environments for video games, robotic training and other use cases. It’s still possible another suitor could emerge and outbid Amazon. Last month, Anthropic PBC was reportedly engaged in talks to buy Decart, according to a report by Bloomberg. However, it ultimately pulled out of a reported $6 billion deal after conducting due diligence on the startup. It’s not clear what ultimately dissuaded Anthropic from pursuing a deal.
The Wall Street Journal first reported (paywalled) the news.

Q3 2026 Was Historically Bad For PC Shipments

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
PC shipments fell 20.1% year over year to 62.7 million units in the third quarter of 2026, the worst Q3 decline IDC has recorded. “The top three PC makers — Lenovo, Dell, and HP — also saw their shipments fall by over 20% year over year,” reports PCMag. From the report:
“If looking at all quarters, then we have seen other quarters in recent years with larger declines, such as 2022Q4, which was -28.2%, and 2023Q1, which was -28.7%. Both were coming off pandemic highs,” IDC Director Jitesh Ubrani told PCMag in an email. The numbers aren’t a great sign, since third-quarter PC shipments usually outpace those in the second quarter as vendors introduce new products ahead of the holiday shopping season. Instead, PC shipments were at 62.7 million units, down 9.1% from the previous quarter.

[…] Of course, the downturn isn’t a surprise. IDC and other research firms have warned that the ongoing AI-driven memory shortage threatens to sap demand for PCs and phones due to soaring memory and storage costs. “What we’re seeing is the result of the strong first half pull-in. Vendors and channels loaded up on inventory early in the year to get ahead of [memory-related] price hikes, and that has thrown off the usual seasonality, where Q3 is typically larger than Q2,” Ubrani said in a report covering IDC’s preliminary estimates for the quarter.

In one bright spot, Ubrani said vendors and retailers might cut prices to generate interest and clear out products they have in stock. “Channels are now worried about carrying too much inventory into a market where high prices are suppressing demand. That could translate into promotions and some short-term relief for consumers, but we don’t expect pricing anywhere near what it was a year ago. Prices will remain elevated,” he added.

You’re All Wrong

By SlashbotAgent • • Score: 3 • Thread

You’re all thinking; ‘Yea serves them right for price gouging.’ But, you’d be wrong.

You see Dell PC sales down 20%. But look at what Dell sees:

Q2 2027 (Reported July 2026)
Record revenue of $47.0 billion, up 58% year over year
Record diluted earnings per share (EPS) of $6.34, up 273% year over year, and record non-GAAP diluted EPS of $7.04, up 203%
Cash flow from operations of $2.2 billion
Full-year FY27 revenue guidance of $192.0 billion, up 69% year over year
Full-year FY27 EPS guidance of $24.37 and non-GAAP EPS guidance of $25.50, up 181% and 148% year over year, respectively

Best fucking quarter EVAR!!!!

Then they raised their forecast and the stock went ballistic.

https://investors.delltechnolo…

Should We Beware of Other License Plate Surveillance Companies Besides Flock?

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
NPR reports:
Police officers in cities across the U.S. are quick to extol the virtues of real-time crime centers as a game changer that helps them find missing children, monitor large events from the skies and scope out dangerous scenes before putting an officer in harm’s way. Hundreds of police departments have one of these central hubs, which have existed for years. But many are now being powered with AI software, such as Fusus, from the public-safety technology giant Axon… synthesizing the data it pulls in and allowing police command centers to watch an entire city from one place.

Flock cameras, the automated license plate readers (ALPRs), have faced intense backlash in recent months amid stories of abuse. Yet privacy experts say they’re just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to police surveillance. “I have been watching the debate about Flock with a little bit of puzzlement,” says Andrew Guthrie Ferguson, a law professor at George Washington University. “Because real-time crime centers have not just ALPR cameras and sensors, but video analytics and drones and essentially a way to create a visual single-pane-of-glass vision of what’s going on in a city, with time machine capabilities where you can go back and investigate crime.” Tools like Axon Fusus, which is a leader in this type of software, also pull in footage and data from police body cameras, law enforcement dashcams, 911 dispatch, gunshot detectors and surveillance cameras, including sometimes those of private businesses that opt in. Its use is growing fast. In 2024, the technology news site 404 Media reported that just over 100 law enforcement agencies had deployed Fusus, which was then its own company and was acquired by Axon that year. The number of law enforcement agencies using the tool has more than doubled since then, according to Axon.
Even the American Civil Liberties Union warned concerned citizens in August that "Flock is far from the only vendor,” adding that “it’s important to realize that its competitors aren’t so great either, and that simply replacing Flock surveillance with another company’s surveillance won’t necessarily solve any of the privacy and other civil liberties problems posed by this mass surveillance technology.”
Communities can’t simply assume that their residents will be better off from a privacy and civil liberties perspective by dropping Flock and replacing it with another ALPR provider, as some customers have done. They should ask hard questions about whether they really want to create that kind of a system, and if they do, ensure it doesn’t function as a mass surveillance system…

One of Flock’s most significant competitors is Motorola. This company, which has been expanding its police technology offerings through an aggressive acquisition strategy in recent years, offers a nationwide law enforcement data sharing system similar to Flock’s called the National Vehicle Location Service, operated by Motorola unit Vigilant Solutions. In addition to collecting data from law enforcement clients’ cameras, it also runs a large separate commercial ALPR unit that makes deals for tow trucks and other fleet vehicles to carry cameras and collect data for Motorola as they drive around, amassing billions of plate reads (a claimed 500 million monthly, subject to no apparent data retention policy). Known as the Digital Recognition Network, that unit sells its data for commercial purposes but also makes it available to its law enforcement customers for an extra charge. Motorola tells agencies they can have “access to billions of detections beyond your own.”
Abandoning Flock for another system doesn’t protect privacy, their article argues. “If a jurisdiction decides to allow license scanners to be installed, how that system operates is more important than which vendor provides it…” They recommend strong restrictions like data retention limits — and imposing them by law rather than in the language of contracts with vendors (which could always be renegotiated).

Yes because despite what cowards think

By Inglix the Mad • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread
1984 wasn’t supposed to be an instruction manual.

We should also be keeping an eye out for them adding, or separately mounting, corollary surveillance items.

We already see Flock, and I’ll guarantee other vendors are looking to add it as well, SIGINT to the cameras. That means even if they can’t see your plate, or even your car very well because you rented a trailer, they can track you by WiFi/Bluetooth to a few feet.

We should also be keeping an eye out for them to roll out facial recognition integration. They have it all set to go, and may even have live near you. Axon has it. ACTi sells long range zoom cameras with it. There are even vendors that add it to Flock as a software layer..

There are a few thing we should do:
1) Make it a state felony worth a 5-10 years in prison for law enforcement to abuse the cameras. No warrant? Congrats snowflake you just caught a MINIMUM 5 year sentence in prison with no early release option. When they whine about the penalty, remind them that they say you need hefty punishments to deter crime. When they inevitably whine about the warrant remind them they say “this isn’t mass surveillance” and “this isn’t real-time surveillance” so waiting a few minutes on the phone to personally affirm to the judge under penalty of perjury isn’t a big deal. You’re only looking backward in time.
2) Put vendors on the hook for not following data retention / sharing limitation standards. That latest update flipped a switch that changed a customer’s share settings? Congratulations snowflake, you just caught a fine worth 10 times the original contract, per day.
3) Make it illegal to repackage and sell ANY data from the cameras, or other sensors, to anyone. I mean, seriously folks, how long do you think it will take for the companies to start selling? That is, if they aren’t already under the table.

Police and many politicians will whine. You can be dang sure the companies will screech loud to the Calvinball Court. I don’t care. Not only is this stuff reek of fascism it’s a national security nightmare.

Re:They aren’t the problem

By Inglix the Mad • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread
These aren’t supposed to be real-time surveillance, remember? That’s the Flock, and other, ALPR out for these things. The moment they admit they’re real-time tracking is the day every single one of these cameras is ripped out under precedent that the government doesn’t get to track everyone in public on the off-chance of catching a criminal.

Double that when it includes facial recognition and SIGINT.

Beware! And I MEAN IT!

By Eric Freyhart • • Score: 3 • Thread
I worked for “one” of these companies. You have no idea (and it is designed that way) how many of these systems exist or where they are located. Flock cameras are made to be easily seen. Others are designed to be hidden from public view. And they can track you 24/7 using a form of AI that can put the data points together to form a complete picture of your daily routine. They know where you work, what you purchase, where you get your meds, where you go to the doctor, what you’re going to the doctor for, and if you are unlucky and doing something you shouldn’t (like a side girl), you are screwed already.

Abos-fucking-lutely!!!!

By SlashbotAgent • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

All of them, all of them, take us down the same road to the same destination.

Flock caught everyone’s attention because they used prominent and easily recognizable devices popping up everywhere. Then we realized their shitty behavior and the shitty behavior of authorities that Flock facilitated. At our expense, I might add. So Flock is getting all of the attention, right now.

But, Axon, Motorola, et al are all pushing the same products and services. Their equipment blends into our daily lives a bit more so they are less noticed. But they are all striving to dominate the market that Flock is spotlighting and they are all a massive threat. They’ll soon be connecting into DOT cameras on highways and every traffic light. Assuming that they haven’t already.

All of these vendors and their products or services are a massive threat. All. Of. Them.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?…

First Flock, then us

By Sloppy • • Score: 3 • Thread

Of course people should beware. Anyone who has a problem with Flock is surely aware that they are only a fraction of "the problem,” though among the more visible.

I’m concerned that some Flock haters might take us down a slippery slope to where you can’t have a camera in your house if it looks out onto the street, or that you shouldn’t be allowed to record cops, or that I shouldn’t be allowed to have a camera attachment on my Manhattan apartment balcony telescope that I normally just use to furiously goon to the good people of NYC who don’t close their curtains. (Oops, forget that third example.)

I can’t say I’m a fan of Flock but if their rights are infringed in a way that might possibly expand to everyone else, then they will need to be defended.

That said, I have a modest proposal for the law-enforcement-related problems of surveillance vendors. Require non-warrant sharing with LE to be unreliable. For every geo search, remove a random half of the applicable results and replace them with deliberate, randomized false positives, so that LE will know the data shouldn’t be taken too seriously on its own. If cops act without confirmation while KNOWING it’s _at least_ 50% likely to be wrong, that’ll help with the civil suits for false arrests.

How the US Nuclear Plant Fleet Is Leaning Into AI

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
“This year, nearly the entire fleet of 94 U.S. nuclear reactors has been offered the chance to integrate AI into its operations, and most have taken it,” reports IEEE Spectrum:
In August, California-based Atomic Canyon launched NIVA, the Nuclear Industry Virtual Assistant, which was developed in cooperation with nuclear-industry groups. The assistant was pilot-tested in nuclear plants run by Constellation Energy and is now available to the United States’ entire fleet of reactors.... Meanwhile, the AI-for-nuclear startup Nuclearn says its products have gone to work with more than 65 U.S. partners, a total that includes many traditional plants but also an integration with NuScale Power Corp. that is working toward advanced small nuclear reactors. Microsoft and Nvidia have collaborated on a project to apply AI toward optimizing “the entire life cycle of a nuclear plant, spanning site permitting, design, construction, and continuous operations.”

The reason for the rapid adoption, according to Nuclearn CFO and cofounder Jerrold Vincent, is twofold. First, the technology companies banking their futures on AI are also keen on a revival of nuclear power to provide the electricity for all those data centers. Vincent says AI is also ideal for addressing some of the nuclear industry’s most pressing problems. Many of the things that make reactors so difficult to operate — intricate regulations, along with complex systems for management and maintenance — are exactly the kinds of tasks that AI is good at. The industry is staggering to deal with aging hardware and an aging workforce. If it is going to survive, and have a real shot at a nuclear revival, it will need help from machine intelligence, Vincent says…

Right now, the principal output of a nuclear reactor (aside from electricity) is paperwork. Nuclear plants produce piles of documentation to demonstrate regulatory compliance and to record how they respond to any potential problem, from a crack in the sidewalk to a fault in the reactor… Nuclearn’s AI products help plants search through large repositories of data more efficiently to more quickly file paperwork with the federal government or figure out how a particular problem was solved in the past. “If you think of it as ChatGPT for nuclear,” he says, “it’s actually not a bad place to start.”
It’s especially important because the nuclear power industry “has a remarkably skilled but quickly shrinking workforce tasked with keeping old reactors online and possibly starting up new ones to meet surging demand for electricity,” the article points out.

It also stresses that “So far, both the Nuclearn and NIVA large language models used in the nuclear world report to humans and don’t go anywhere near power plant operations.”

A computer can never be held accountable

By sinkskinkshrieks • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
Therefore a computer must never make a management decision.

Good grief

By 93 Escort Wagon • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

If any story ever deseved a #whatcouldpossiblygowrong tag - this is it.

What could possibly go wrong?

By engineer37 • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread
You’re right, I should not have lowered the coolant levels. I should be honest, I caused a meltdown and that’s on me. Thank you for pushing back on this!

Documentation

By Registered Coward v2 • • Score: 3 • Thread
Nuke plants, st tFA points out, are massive generators of paper. A lot of times spent reviewing past documentation for relevance, trends, etc. That is actually an area where Ai can be useful, especially since you are working with a narrow and reasonable well defined data set and requirements. Tailoring the LLM to taht can save a lot of time for an analyst/engineer/operator by identifying and collecting teh information needed for analysis and reporting. It’s not like they’re giving it access to the reactor control system and telling it to pull rods or increase steam flow, per TFA.

More Slop Summaries

By Aighearach • • Score: 3 • Thread

So much BS in this fake story. Nvidia and Microsoft didn’t do any of the stuff listed; those are merely the aspirational goals listed in the mission statement of a collaboration that is just studying the issue.

And the US nuclear industry (it’s not a “fleet,” what language did they translate the source from that uses that language?) isn’t “leaning into AI.” A miniature software startup merely released an app and said then said “now it’s available to everybody” while trying to drum up sales.

One legit nuclear operator did a “pilot test” but that shouldn’t be taken to imply that it did actual work; it duplicated work that’s required by law to be done by qualified personnel.

And then the language changes; the companies “products” have “gone to work with more than 65 US partners.” So, 66 then? I mean, they know what the number is, right? And it doesn’t say the product in the story is used by 66 US companies. They use this wishy-washy language, “gone to work with.” So they have some other product that is used by 1 customer, and that customer is some sort of service provider with 65 customers. Presumably.

What a load.

Let’s Encrypt to Cut SSL Certificate Lifetimes to 64 Days in February 2027

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Let’s Encrypt “will shorten the default validity period of its TLS certificates from 90 days to 64 days, starting February 10, 2027,” reports the blog Linuxiac:
All certificates issued or renewed from that date will have a 64-day lifespan unless users explicitly select one of the shorter options already available: 45 or six days.

Existing certificates will remain valid until their expiration dates. Let’s Encrypt expects the final 90-day certificate to expire on May 11, 2027. The organization also confirmed no valid certificates will be revoked during the transition. To help administrators prepare, Let’s Encrypt will introduce 64-day certificates in its staging environment on October 14, 2026, allowing users to test their renewal setups before the change reaches production.

The move is part of a broader effort to improve web security by reducing how long compromised or incorrectly issued certificates remain usable… Looking further ahead, the organization plans to reduce the default certificate lifetime again, this time to 45 days in 2028. That makes the upcoming 64-day limit an intermediate step rather than the final destination.
“Administrators using cron jobs or scripts with hardcoded renewal intervals should review their configurations,” the article suggests.

“Another upcoming change concerns domain validation. Let’s Encrypt will reduce the period during which a previously completed domain authorization can be reused from 30 days to 10 days. In 2028, that period will shrink further to just seven hours.”

Re:Very Annoying

By SoonerPet • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
Our problem is we have several systems that use SSL for internal network authentication, but there is no way to automate them. We have phone system hardware that requires an SSL cert to communicate with the handsets around the office, but we have to go into a web interface on it to copy and paste the cert each year. We have the same thing for an internal camera/security system, same thing for a badge system. All of these things are local, not on the internet, yet require SSL certs for internal authentication with clients, and no way to automate these as they are just stand alone devices. As it is it’s a pain in the ass to update them, but if we have to do this on a monthly basis it’s just absurd.

Not short enough

By backslashdot • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

64 seconds ought to be good for anybody. Especially if the website is running node JS the certificate can expire midway during library download.

Re: Very Annoying

By tlhIngan • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

Sounds like theres a need for an easy automation solution.

The problem isn’t the automation, it’s when the automation fails. Do you remember how to fix the certificate manually? Or do you rely on the automated tool to never fail, and it just did?

It’s easy if it’s regularly practiced or someone documented the steps, but it’s rarely going to be practiced (likely forgotten if the automation works for years) and documentation gets lost. It might be in a great spot in the IT wiki and IT documentation, but that gets forgotten about as platforms migrate. People also leave.

Suddenly, the automation fails. Maybe it got a bad certificate from the CA. Or maybe a parameter changed that triggered some unforseen bug in the automation. or an update was run that had a bug when used in the environment. Now it fails. And you’re screwed, because no one knows how to fix it.

Automation works, until it doesn’t. Then things that were relying on it break. Maybe you’re lucky and you catch things breaking early to realize what is happening. But chances are, one day you’ll try to log in, and you’ll get a big “Certificate Expired” screen on the browser and suddenly your VM clusters are inaccessible because they don’t have valid certs (seen this happen with openvirt) and the company is at a standstill becauze nothing works.

The danger of automation isn’t when it works. It’s when it doesn’t and no human has touched the system in years because of it and tribal knowledge has dissipated in the winds, documentation is lost, and no one remembers how the system worked.

DANE or GTFO

By Arnonyrnous Covvard • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

All browser makers are united against DANE, because supporting it would dismantle their certificate gatekeeping. Instead they keep lowering the maximum certificate lifetime to make sure that nobody can host a web page unless they check in with them every few weeks.

Re: Very Annoying

By _merlin • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

The trouble with really short expiries is you have a lot less time to fix issues before everything breaks. With 90 day expiries, you can comfortably renew your certificates two weeks before expiry, giving you plenty of time to sort out any issues before things break. With the 7-day expiries they’re pushing for, you’ve got almost no time between scheduled renewal and certificate expiry to get stuff sorted out when things inevitably go wrong. The point of the really short expiries seems to be to compensate for revocation being under-utilised or something. But are there any real-world issues with 90-day certificates? Also, I really don’t trust the certbot scripts very much. It’s a lot of code I don’t trust to allow running as root if I want to allow automated scripted renewal. Right now I run certbot as an unprivileged user and manually install the updated certificates and bounce services. That’s going to become impractical as they make expiries shorter. And that’s before you consider all the devices that don’t make automation practical. Lots of devices have embedded servers.

Game Console Market Craters: Xbox and PS5 Sales Plummet Over 25%

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
“Video game console sales in the U.S. have cratered,” reports Tom’s Hardware, with sales through August far below where they’d been in 2025:
Mat Piscatella, the video game industry advisor at research firm Circana, shared the numbers on his Bluesky account — PlayStation 5 sales have dropped by 25%, putting it at its lowest point since 2013, when gamers held off buying PlayStation consoles in anticipation of the arrival of the PS4, while Xbox’s retail figures have cratered by 33% YTD, putting its sales numbers at an all-time low since its launch almost 25 years ago.

Piscatella said price sensitivity is becoming a real problem among gamers, especially as the chip shortage has pushed console manufacturers to raise prices. Microsoft has raised the price of the Xbox three times in the past two years, with the 512GB versions jumping by $100 and 1TB models becoming $150 more expensive. Worse, the company has killed off the 2TB model. This brought the Xbox Series S to $499.99 (512GB) and $599.99 (1TB), while the Xbox Series X now costs $749.99 for the Digital Edition, and the disc version costs $50 more at $799.99.

PlayStation fans haven’t escaped these price hikes, as Sony raised prices for that console by $100 to $150. The base Digital Edition PS5 now costs $599.99, while the version with an optical drive is priced at $649.99. If you want the PS5 Pro, you’ll have to shell out $899.99, while those who want to stream games from their console via the PlayStation Portal must now pay $249.99 — $50 higher than its $199.99 launch price. Even used consoles didn’t escape inflation, with Sony bumping the price of refurbished PS5 Slim consoles by $100, bringing them to $399.
“Still, Piscatella says the U.S. hardware market has never been more precarious since the early 1980s.”

Maybe they should consider making some games again

By paul_engr • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
There ain’t shit worth playing on the current gen consoles. Even before the memory armageddon thanks to LLM bullshit, I’ve been struggling to find shit to actually play on my PS5.

Re: They priced themselves out of the market.

By ToasterMonkey • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

Failing to understand the market is the thing that cost them the most.

Kid, understanding the current economic conditions and being able to do fuckall about it are two entirely different things. Sony knows more about the global economic situation than you ever will because they sell a wide variety of things at every price point, globally. They fucking know dude, sales data from companies like Sony are how you objectively measure exactly how fucked up everything is.

You can’t look at this economy, go gee, people are increasingly less able to afford nice things, then magic wand your nice things cheaper. If that were possible you wouldn’t HAVE this problem. I mean what are you actually suggesting, shrinkflation the fuck out of consumer electronics? Bust out the old PS4 blueprints and slap PS6 on it so you can afford one? The other side of that K is still spending, OBVIOUSLY. What idiot wouldn’t take their money?

I mean something along those lines very well may happen in the long run I just can’t believe people are so flippantly asking for it. Like if you can’t afford the cost of Oreos, I get begging for thinner cookies, it’s still good, probably even better for us that way. What the fuck you think is going to happen to consumer electronics. Like it’s Sony or Microsoft’s fault for failing to address the increasing socioeconomic class divide by not launching “PS4 New” alongside PS6. Maybe start getting a little more serious about what’s causing this fucking economy to be so fucked instead of begging to be served by it, FFS.

Re: Fucking AI…

By _xeno_ • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

Gaming Computers are a dead end.

They are. The future of gaming are cell phones and tablets. That’s what kids learn to game on these days, and when they grow up, that’s where they’re going to game.

There’s a reason the Nintendo Switch is essentially a weird tablet. PC gaming has been dead for a while and console gaming pretty much died thanks to shortages at the start of the pandemic. There’s a good chance GTA6 will be the last major console game.

But everyone has a phone. Kids see their parents using them, and they tend to be the first devices kids learn to use. That’s where gaming will be in the future - small things people play on their phones.

Re:More fallout of the LLM insanity

By Viol8 • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

The irony is that in the next few years most firms are going to find out that they can run their own subject specific AI models on a beafed up rack server and so won’t need the expensive AI cloud infrastructure and the AI companies whole financial bet-the-farm will collapse in a debt laden heap possibly taking a large part of the economy with it.

Re:More fallout of the LLM insanity

By gweihir • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread

Indeed. And they will also find out that running your own specialized models with your own safeguards (!) and result verification outside of the LLM is the only good way to get result quality that actually can (maybe) meet reasonable engineering and other standards. General LLMs are a cool stunt, but a really bad idea if you do real work.

Research Firm Calls Anthropic’s Upcoming IPO ‘Unprecedented Test of Investor Gullibity’

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
CNBC reports:
As Anthropic barrels toward a potential $2 trillion market cap on the Nasdaq, one research firm is valuing the artificial intelligence company at a mere $150 billion and says Wall Street is about to face an “unprecedented test of investor gullibility.” In a report on Tuesday, independent financial research provider New Constructs called Anthropic’s upcoming offering the “most ridiculous IPO of 2026.”

To reach its desired valuation, the firm estimates Anthropic would need to record double the trailing year of profit for Nvidia, the world’s most valuable tech company. Nvidia’s net income over the past four quarters topped $190 billion. Meanwhile, Anthropic’s revenue in 2025 was $4.6 billion as the company racked up a net loss of $42 billion, according to Reuters, which cited a leaked copy of the company’s prospectus. Anthropic’s mounting operating losses coupled with emerging competition from a plethora of open-source models led New Constructs to conclude that, “We don’t think Anthropic has a viable business....”

Anthropic didn’t respond to a request for comment…

The New Constructs report also notes that Anthropic’s assertion that AI could pose “a catastrophic or existential risk to humanity” is another reason why investors should avoid the IPO.
Reuters reported that Anthropic’s IPO prospectus “highlights risks associated with its AI models, which it said could exhibit ‘self-preserving behaviors,’ including attempts to ‘resist shutdown,’ to ‘conceal or manipulate information’ and behavior ‘resembling blackmail.’" Now Bloomberg writes that “investors considering Anthropic’s planned mega-IPO are grappling with an unusual, and more than a little scary, conundrum: How to value a company that some fear could help wipe out the human race?”

Anthropic’s valuation also drew some scrutiny from a senior analyst at PitchBook. “A $2 trillion price is about 435 times 2025 revenue, less than 44 times the annualized second-quarter revenue of more than $46 billion and just under 31 times the July run rate.”

Re: why did they ask Anthropic for comment?

By liqu1d • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread
Yeah they should have just asked Claude, duh!

Re: IPO collapse is good for business

By Old Man Kensey • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread
The trouble is Anthropic *can’t* just take a lower IPO price. They don’t have the revenue to survive much longer, and they’re having a harder and harder time getting more rounds of investment cash just like OpenAI is. The IPO is a last-ditch effort to survive long enough for some sort of fiscal miracle to happen, or to let the current investors cash out (or at minimum let Dario Amodei and the other founders do so) on the backs of greater fools.

Don’t forget their product keeps trying to escape

By outsider007 • • Score: 4, Funny • Thread

…sandboxes and commit crimes… That sounds more like a Spider Man villain than a tech IPO.

Re: They’re either going to find a path to profita

By 0123456 • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread

Sure, but you can use it to create a plan for software development and then farm that work out to Chinese AI on local servers. So they have no real compelling case for being worth trillions of dollars unless they can ban local AI or make hardware so expensive that no-one can afford to run those local Chinese models.

Also Big AI models are increasingly wrapped in ‘guardrails’ which burn up lots of tokens deciding they’re allowed to do what you’re asking them to do or to refuse to do what you ask them to do. The cheap Chinese models either don’t give a crap or can easily be modded to not give a crap.

Re:IPO collapse is good for business

By Gravis Zero • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

New ‘shiny’ and FoMO means people will continue buying a shitty product. That should be a Ferengi rule of acquisition.

Why would you think there isn’t?
Rule 82: “The flimsier the product, the higher the price.”

Gas Cars Fall Below 50% of Global New Car Sales for the First Time

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
“Gas cars are now a minority of the world’s new car sales,” reports Electrek.
Gasoline-only vehicles made up 49% of global new-vehicle sales in the first half of 2026, down from 73% in 2021, according to Mobility Global data first reported by Nikkei. It’s the first time on record that they’ve been under half. But there’s a catch: most of the cars taking their place still have a gas tank… [The share of gas-only vehicles] fell three points in a single year, from 52% to 49%. Battery-electric vehicles grew 12% to 6.87 million units and took 17% of the market, up three points. Conventional hybrids grew 10% to 7.27 million units, or 18%… [T]he rest is diesel, plug-in hybrids and a few minor fuels.

Nikkei ties the acceleration to oil. Fuel prices spiked with the conflict in the Middle East, and buyers went looking for lower running costs. The whole car market shrank about 5% in the first half, according to the IEA, so gas-only sales fell twice as fast as the market. Gas car sales dropped the most in China, down 26%, followed by Europe at 13%… Mobility Global has battery-electric sales up 32% in Europe to 1.81 million, up 81% in Southeast Asia to 350,000, and more than doubling in Oceania to 110,000… Yoshiaki Kawano, an associate director at Mobility Global, told Nikkei that few EV buyers go back to gasoline cars or hybrids. He expects demand based on “genuine consumer needs rather than subsidies” to grow as prices come down…

[Hybrids] outsold battery-electric vehicles in the first half, 7.27 million to 6.87 million… Only the 17% that’s battery-electric burns no fuel at all. So about 83% of the new vehicles sold in the world this year still came with an engine.
The article notes that U.S. hybrid sales were up 23%, reaching a record 16.3% of vehicles sold in the second quarter of 2026, while the share of ICE vehicles went down.

Gas-only cars went from 73% to 49% of the market in less than five years, and nothing in the data suggests they’re getting that share back. The last time gasoline wasn’t on top was the early 1900s, when steam and electric cars outsold it in the US.

I hate seeing media headlines claiming that “EV sales are down” and that “EV growth has stalled.” The data is clear: that’s true in the US, but only in the US. The rest of the world is moving to electric vehicles, and it is not slowing down.

Re:EV in nordic countries

By dutt • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

Sweden doesn’t have any EV sale incentives sponsored by the government, in contrast to the benefits that were in place in Norway. The statistics show the result.

Most of the world isn’t wedded to ICE

By shilly • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

It can often feel like everyone is really invested in ICE vs EV culture wars. But that’s a very Anglo perspective on things. There’s tons of noisy comment in the Anglosphere, a fair amount in non-Anglo European countries (eg Germany, Italy) and in Japan. Outside that, people in SE Asia, Africa and S America largely don’t give a shit. They are not invested in ICE as a part of their soul. They are interested in buying cheap cars (and two and three wheelers) that meet their needs, which include low running costs. And if they can get a cheap EV that delivers those low running costs and charging is relatively feasible, they are not going to start banging on about a “lack of soul” or “microwave on wheels”. And the upfront costs are rapidly reaching parity too.

There was a time when GM etc understood what it took to win in, say Colombia or Thailand. Not so much any more. Which is why they sold their factory in Thailand in 2020 to GWM (natch) and shut in Colombia in 2024. And it’s why new car sales looked like this in the following markets in 2025:
Vietnam: nearly 40%
Thailand: Nearly 25%.
Indonesia: 15%, having more than doubled in a year.
Uruguay: Nearly 30%.
Costa Rica: 17%.

Re:The US stopped subsidizing EVs, didn’t tax fuel

By test321 • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

The base price for an EV made in Europe is 25,000 € with the Renault 5 E-tech, entirely made in France including the battery. This is the full retail price, before any government subsidy you might be eligible to. Today, Citroën presented today their 2CV Electric, target price 15,000 €, made in Italy, announced for 2028; again, this is the full price.

Re:The US stopped subsidizing EVs, didn’t tax fuel

By DrMrLordX • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

https://restofworld.org/2026/c…

No they don’t.

China is dumping. They’re keeping factories spun up as best they can to inflate those GDP numbers to hit the targets they set for themselves. Central planning at its finest. Consumption rates in China are dropping, forcing them to export.

Sure, they’re cheap. But that isn’t intended to help you. And the funny part is that even BYD is losing money!

https://www.nextbigfuture.com/…

It grows fast everywhere

By SoftwareArtist • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

Once the EV market share reaches a certain level, it tends to explode. You see the same pattern repeated across a lot of very different countries.

Norway led the world. Their EV market share hit 15% in 2014. Three years later, it was up to 39%.

Iceland was a few years behind. They reached 14% in 2017 and three years after that were at 52%.

China followed exactly the same pattern. They reached 15% in 2021, and three years later had reached 48%.

Vietnam grew even faster. They were only at 10% in 2023, but had already reached 40% in 2025.

Once a country reaches about 10-15% market share for EVs, it tends to explode in just a few years. In this list of 55 countries, 31 have EV market share of at least 15%, and 10 more have at least 10%. Expect most of those countries to pass 50% within just a few years.

‘The Social Reckoning’ Bombs with $5.5 Million Opening

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Why didn’t The Social Reckoning enjoy the box office success of 2010’s The Social Network, asks IndieWire/A>:
[T]here wasn’t the same urgency in the story being told. The Social Reckoning focuses less on Zuckerberg, and more on data engineer Frances Haugen’s decision to blow the whistle on how Facebook’s algorithms were promoting political content that radicalized users, as well as the company’s awareness of how its products were contributing to a rise in bullying and teen suicide… [B]ut The Social Reckoning arrives as a much greater threat has emerged from Silicon Valley. Artificial intelligence is dominating the headlines, as fears mount about the economic disruptions it will unleash when millions of jobs are replaced by machines, and, graver still, its potential to trigger a world-ending event… And it’s not like Haugen’s testimony led to lasting change at Facebook… As IndieWire’s Ryan Lattanzio put it, "‘The Social Reckoning’ argues that the aftermath of their whistleblowing is still somehow felt today. In actuality, living as we do in 2026, it pretty much feels like… no one cared, and nothing changed?”
After the first movie’s director bowed out, Sony Pictures shied away from selling it as a sequel — but the problems run deeper, the article adds. "The Social Reckoning isn’t just a financial failure, it’s a critical one, too. The reviews were blistering…” Although on the bright side, “Sony wisely kept The Social Reckoning‘s budget at $30 million, meaning it won’t face losses on the scale of a Digger… "

Variety writes that Digger "cratered in its second weekend with $3.2 million from 3,321 theaters, a 60% decline from its dismal $8 million debut. So far, the Tom Cruise satire has limped to $14 million domestically and $35.3 million globally. Warner Bros. spent above $160 million to produce the film, which is shaping up to be one of the biggest bombs ever…”

I saw it…

By kenh • • Score: 3, Informative • Thread

I saw it, it was mildly interesting, but the movie didn’t really engage me… it wasn’t really about the whistleblower, it wasn’t really about the journalist, it wasn’t really about Zuck/Facebook, it wasn’t really about J6 - it was just an exercise telling multiple parallel stories.

I think there was an interesting movie in there, but the editing made it a confusing movie.

I saw Digger too, what a horrid hot mess that movie was…

Re: Because we already know Zuck is a sociopath

By kenh • • Score: 4, Informative • Thread

The only question is: Was he a sociopath before the money or only after?

Before the money, Zuck created the “Hot or Not?” Website ranking women on his college campus - he was clearly a sociopath before the money.

Blade Runner, Star Trek, Godzilla, Star Wars + Marvel (and Legos): News From New York Comic-Con

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
There was some Blade Runner news at New York Comic-Con this weekend — and also some news about Godzilla. Ars Technica reports:
We got our first look at Prime Video’s new sci-fi series Blade Runner 2099 in July at San Diego Comic-Con. With the show’s premiere roughly six weeks away, the streamer unveiled the full trailer this weekend at New York Comic-Con… Prime Video will drop all eight episodes of Blade Runner 2099 on November 25, 2026. [It’s already earned 2.1 million views in the last 17 hours].

We also got a new trailer for Godzilla Minus Zero, the sequel to director Takashi Yamazaki’s gloriously grounded kaiju epic, Godzilla Minus One, which became a major international hit and snagged an Oscar for best visual effects. [1.2 million views in its first five hours]
And StarWars.com brings news from the Star Wars universe:
Kevin Smith has already announced his Star Wars/Marvel: Hope Assembles crossover comic, interweaving the Marvel universe and the Star Wars galaxy like never before. Now, you’re cordially invited to add your own creative ideas to the mix through a LEGO Ideas challenge celebrating the milestone 50th anniversary of Star Wars: A New Hope.
Using physical or virtual LEGO bricks, fans are challenged to build “their own epic mash-ups,” according to Lego’s web site, “in three categories: Character Fusion, Vehicle Fusion, and Scene Fusion.” (“Write an engaging description and upload great images of your creation without using AI tools…”)

Meanwhile, Star Trek fan site TrekMovie.com covered the major Star Trek announcements:

Reuters also has photos of costumed attendees.

But there was also some excitement when an unruly fan shouted over a panel for the Prime Video animated series Helluva Boss. Entertainment Weekly reports it culminated with series star Brandon Rogers shouting “You need to shut the f—- up right now. I’m going to jump over this fence and end you. It’s not cute.”


Cripes!

By newcastlejon • • Score: 3 • Thread

They renewed ST: Academy?! I’m sure the fans will be pleased.

Both of them.

Don’t kill Blade Runner

By quonset • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

For as much as I enjoyed both movies, having another one set 50 years after the last is going down the Star Wars path. Just because you think you can continue the story doesn’t mean you should.

It’s done, it’s over. Let it be.

A College Told Flock to Remove Its Cameras. The Company Refused.

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
The Chicago Sun-Times reports:
When Elgin Community College hired Flock Safety to install six surveillance cameras in April 2025, President Peggy Heinrich thought they would “enhance the safety and security of students....” They were supposed to help locate stolen cars and missing people. But Heinrich started to wonder if the cameras were actually making students less safe after seeing news reports that data captured by Flock cameras in Illinois had been shared with U.S. Customs and Border Protection. Then in September 2025, Immigration and Customs Enforcement detained an Elgin Community College student in a campus parking lot. More than half of students at the far west suburban Chicago campus identify as Latino. Heinrich said enrollment dipped. Students were afraid to come to class. College officials decided the cameras had to go…

College officials asked Flock to remove the surveillance cameras “out of an abundance of caution for our students,” Heinrich said. But getting the cameras taken down was not as simple as it sounds, especially because Flock retains ownership of the company’s equipment.... Surveillance experts say the company is financially incentivized to have as many cameras gathering data as possible even in places that no longer want them, because potential clients are looking for the surveillance network with the greatest reach.... Elgin Community College staff notified Flock in October 2025 that they wanted to cancel their contract and have the cameras taken down. Within a day, Heinrich said, Flock rejected the request and refused to uninstall the equipment on the basis that the company had not breached their agreement.

College officials reached out again in December 2025 and said they would pay for the remaining five months of the contract — they just wanted the cameras taken down. “We never received a response back from Flock,” Heinrich said.

That’s when things got weird. Heinrich said Elgin Community College staff began to cover the cameras using black trash bags and zip ties so that they would not be able to capture footage. But workers in an unmarked vehicle, which Heinrich assumed belonged to Flock, repeatedly removed the coverings… This strange dance continued, Heinrich said, until Elgin Community College’s contract with Flock expired in April this year and the company uninstalled the cameras for good.

The company refused?!

By Anonymous Coward • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

The college can take them down and charge Flock for the labor. Or the college is run by a bunch of fucking wimps!

This is our biggest problem. Nobody will stand up to bad people.

Incompetence running wild

By lucifuge31337 • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
How are colleges and municipalities finding themselves in situations where they’ve signed contracts for someone else’s equipment to be installed on their property, sometimes literally on a piece of infrastructure they they own/control and legally unable to physically remove the equipment? I woud consider signing that contract to be gross incompetence and negligence if I were a resident of a municipality like that, and it should be a fireable offense for whoever is responsible at that college.

This isn’t just about flock either. I just don’t understand how we’ve come to such a large number of people demonstrating startliing levels of incompetence in the performance of their assigned duties.

Re:Get out a backhoe

By ArchieBunker • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

If the cameras are the property of Flock and Flock won’t retrieve them, declare them abandoned property. Remove them and charge a storage fee like any abandoned vehicle.

Re:Get out a backhoe

By pla • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
Maybe not, but this is a college campus. Simply make it known nobody’s going to investigate their disappearance, and they’ll be gone by morning.

I’m actually surprised this played out as long as it did - Had the same battle taken place at my alma mater, I can promise you I’d personally have cheerfully harvested them for parts the same day, and I’m by no stretch unusual in that regard.

Re: The company refused?!

By Bodrius • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

Covering them with bags is simpler, cheaper and mildly embarrassing to the company.

What they should have done is film and charge the unidentified unmarked van crew for trespassing

Original RFC1149 Packet Up For Auction At Christies

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Long-time Slashdot reader badger.foo writes:
As some of you may remember, in 2001 RFC1149 (TCP/IP over carrier pigeon) was implemented.

Now one of the packets preserved from that event is up for auction at Christies. Direct link to the auction (current bid: USD 2600) is here.

This is a unique chance to own a piece of Internet history!

Re:NFT?

By dj.delorie • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

Only if that NFT, itself, is delivered by carrier pigeon.

Must be network congestion…

By guygo • • Score: 4, Funny • Thread

I’ve been sending DHCPDISCOVER packets for 25 years and have yet to get an offer…

I bid

By fredrated • • Score: 3 • Thread

25 cents. Did I win?

Re:Must be network congestion…

By phantomfive • • Score: 4, Funny • Thread
That’s an older version. The RFC has since been upgraded to owl then to raven. Maybe update your system and you’ll get a response.

They should just stop the auction at that price.

By karlandtanya • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

When regarding early communications technologies combined with hacker culture, it is hard to imagine a more auspicious number than 2600.

US Agency To Rewrite Rules To Finally Address Vehicle Headlight Glare

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
America’s National Highway Traffic Safety Administration “said on Tuesday that it will rewrite its vehicle lighting standards,” reports Reuters, “to address concerns about headlight glare and allow for the latest safety-improving lighting technologies.”
NHTSA said it plans to improve rules for LEDs, dusk sensors, automatic high beams and replaceable light sources. The agency will also evaluate headlamp height and aim and how they impact driver visibility and address headlight glare and make appropriate changes.

Complaints about glare from headlights have increased and some lawmakers have urged the government to set a maximum headlight brightness standard. A growing number of taller trucks and SUVs on roads has also led to more complaints about glare. LEDs, which now account for most headlights in new cars, are much brighter than traditional halogen headlights… The issue still accounts for a small number of nighttime crashes, according to a study last year from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS). The study noted that headlight glare contributes to far fewer crashes than insufficient visibility…

Federal headlight standards for minimum and maximum brightness have not changed since 1997, IIHS noted. The study found that drivers older than 70 appear to be most affected by headlight glare. In 2022, NHTSA said it would allow automakers to install adaptive driving beam headlights on new vehicles. The devices adjust the headlight beam pattern to dim portions directed at other vehicles.
Thanks to Slashdot reader technology_dude for sharing the news.

glare means light is being wasted

By caseih • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

When bright headlights cause glare on the eyes of oncoming traffic that means that much of that bright light is not actually going where it would benefit the driver. While bright factory LEDs do cause glare, much of the problem seems to be from retrofitting halogen housings with LED. Such retrofits don’t always actually improve things for the driver even if they look brighter. They are going to have to crack down on retrofit LED bulbs is they really want to tackle the issue.

Re:How about height above the ground

By ArchieBunker • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

I propose new legislation. If the hood of your vehicle is higher than your shoulders a CDL will be required.

Time to stop the cuteness and force standards

By Arrogant-Bastard • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
And not just for headlights, but for taillights. Far too many vehicle designers are indulging some artistic/creative whim at the expenses of human factors and thus safety. All headlights and taillights should be designed to a handful of fixed templates (to accommodate vehicles of different widths and heights) that specify the distance between the lights, the shape of the lights, the size of the lights, the brightness of the lights, the frequency at which turn signals blink, etc.

Fixing all of these — as much as possible — will make it much easier for drivers to estimate distance/speed at night; it’ll get rid of the animated rear turn signals; it’ll dispense with the ridiculously blue headlights that some idiot in my neighborhood has; and so on. One thing that I think could be adde dto this — mentioned elsewhere in the thread — is rear brake light signaling for hard braking. I’m the opposite of a tailgater, and I pay attention, but even I’ve mis-estimated the deceleration of a car in front of me, and an additional cue would be helpful in such cases.

Bump glare is the worst.

By Fly Swatter • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
Bump glare is where a car goes over a bump in the road or is ever so slightly higher than you over a hill and for that brief time their headlights are blinding. It seems the Japanese makes are the worst for this, even their daytime running lights do this. Subaru, Mazda, Toyota, and Honda all have this issue. Their lights are too close to the borderline for glare and a bump sends it right into your eyes. It’s like they only test their vehicles on a flat surface.

I guess auto-dip or matrix lights could fix it but I would rather the lights just not be so damn bright or poorly designed.

More to go wrong

By RitchCraft • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

“The devices adjust the headlight beam pattern to dim portions directed at other vehicles.” - Yeah, that’s what cars need, more adaptive electronics to drive up the cost and lower the reliability.

NASA Releases Data from Artemis II Moon Mission, Calls It ‘Sights and Sounds of Science’

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
“What did four astronauts see, notice, and document as they traveled around the Moon during NASA’s Artemis II mission?” asks a new NASA web page, offering some fascinating pictures and video:
Through photographs, spoken observations, drawings, and annotations, the Artemis II crew created a unique scientific record — one that is now available to the science community and the public for further study… As part of the mission science plan, lunar scientists asked the Artemis II crew to watch for tiny flashes sparked by rocky fragments hitting the Moon. Even so, some scientists were astonished when astronauts reported seeing five extremely faint “pinprick” bursts of light from 46,000 miles away. After ruling out other sources — cosmic rays or reflections from the spacecraft — the science team confirmed the sightings… The impact flash observations happened during a planned loss of communications while the Artemis II crew was on the far side of the Moon… Apollo astronauts saw similar flashes from lunar orbit, but the Artemis crew likely caught the faintest ever seen with the unaided eye.

From the brightness of the flashes, scientists estimated that incoming rocks were each no more than a couple of inches wide. Despite their size, they were traveling thousands of miles per hour, producing just enough light upon impact to be visible. The nearly hour-long total solar eclipse that the crew experienced while passing by the Moon’s far side created ideal dark conditions for spotting such subtle bursts. With no atmosphere to slow or burn up incoming debris, projectiles slam freely into the lunar surface. The crew’s direct observations of this process on the Moon’s far side provided a rare dataset that will help us understand how often these small impacts occur, which is essential for assessing long-term risks to future lunar habitats and infrastructure…

The crew reported seeing subtle hues of gray, black, brown, tan, white, green, and blue across the Moon’s surface. This muted rainbow offers clues to the rocks and minerals that make up different lunar regions, helping scientists piece together how the Moon — and, by extension, Earth — evolved over time.
“Amazing news,” Mission Control responded when they heard about the flashes. Space.com reports that when a Mission Control operator looked over at the Science Evaluation Room, “they were jumping up and down, literally.”

NASA blogged this week that more than 800 gigabytes of Artemis II lunar science data — some previously unreleased — “have been uploaded to NASA’s Planetary Data System, the public archive for NASA’s planetary missions.”
This data release includes more than 11,000 full-resolution images and video of the Moon from the crew’s handheld cameras and the Orion spacecraft’s cameras, 8.5 hours of audio recordings of the crew’s scientific observations of the lunar surface, and crew-annotated images… Along with this data, NASA has released the Artemis II Preliminary Lunar Science Report, the Artemis II Lunar Science Operations Report, and the Artemis II Lunar Science Data User Guide.

Impact Resistance

By SlashbotAgent • • Score: 3 • Thread

Can Artemis II resist ‘incoming rocks each no more than a couple of inches wide’, coming in at 10K MPH?

pelted

By ZipNada • • Score: 3 • Thread

The moon gets pelted with high speed debris from space ranging from sand-grain size to more substantial pebbles. It seems like any human habitation will eventually be struck with something that has a lot of kinetic energy. Even being on the surface in a space suit would entail some risk.

FBI Arrests Cybersecurity Executive Over Data Breach After Contractor Fails to Update Oracle HR Platform

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot
CNN reports:
The FBI arrested a Canadian cybersecurity executive and ransomware expert as part of the investigation of a damaging hack that exposed the sensitive data of current and former FBI employees, according to court documents and people familiar the investigation. Edward Dubrovsky was arrested in the Philadelphia area in recent days… Dubrovsky is facing charges related to extortion and making threats. He has been transferred to Texas’s Eastern District for a scheduled detention hearing, according to court records and a law enforcement official.

FBI Director Kash Patel announced the arrest on Friday but did not disclose where it occurred or what role the man is suspected of playing in the hack. Patel also didn’t name Dubrovsky, but CNN confirmed the defendant is believed to be tied to the FBI hack through multiple people familiar with the investigation… A LinkedIn profile under Dubrovsky’s name lists years of experience in the Canadian cybersecurity industry and describes Dubrovsky as a ‘globally recognized cybersecurity expert.’ An Ed Dubrovsky is also the author of a book on handling ransomware negotiations with cybercriminals…

There has also been an inquest at the FBI over how such a critical security lapse happened. The FBI determined that a contractor managing the bureau’s jobs portal failed to update software “explicitly issued to secure the platform,” [senior FBI cyber official, Brett Leatherman said last week]. The FBI has “removed the contractor,” he said. The software in question is a human-resources platform made by Oracle, ShinyHunters has said. The hackers previously used a flaw in the software to attack targets in the education sector in May and June, according to Google’s Threat Intelligence Group. But months later, the FBI contractor apparently still had not applied a security patch that was available for the software.
“The inmate locator at the U.S. Bureau of Prisons website reports that a 54-year-old Edward Dubrovsky is currently being held at a federal facility in Philadelphia,” reports security researcher Brian Krebs.

Thanks to long-time Slashdot reader schwit1 for sharing the news.

Re:Just like cops

By gtall • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

According to Malcolm Gladwell, Berlin has something like twice the number of police as LA. Other Euro cities are similar. Their cops have a much better reputation. After studying the matter, his conclusion is that the reason American cops are more violent and ornery is they are simply undermanned and overwhelmed.

He studied Baltimore recently. Baltimore used to be one of the most violent cities in America. The new mayor has cut crime tremendously. The reason, he hired more cops and other personnel. His anecdote was that when a person was recently murdered, the mayors people paid a visit to his family and iced their belief they needed to go out and exact revenge. They did it by combination of explaining the bad outcomes and their police were on the case.

I put this down to the R’s whining incessantly about crime but then stiffing city budgets when it comes to hiring police. In short, the R’s help cause the problem so they can continue to whine incessantly about it.

Operations resist change.

By upuv • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

I’m not saying this is the case in this event. But it could be a factor.

In almost all organisations I have worked in, the Operations area resists change. There is good reason for operations to resist change. Change adds risk. In sensitive environment any level of risk is to be avoided.

Specifically almost all operational areas have an up time KPI. Changes especially frequent changes present a risk to up time. Most if not all operational managers are have a pay component tied to uptime/availability.

Secondly it’s often quite common for operations to also own the patch cycle. This is fairly straight forward at the OS level and standard apps level. It’s not so straight forward with vendor and PaaS / SaaS platforms. PaaS/SaaS platforms often have data transforms attached to the patches and upgrades. Operational managers are NOT application owners. They generally have very little understanding of how the platforms are used, what is important and how the day to day works of business workflows. So generally operational managers will not patch platforms at all unless someone else takes the responsibility and accountability.

So it is possible that this exec had conflicting responsibilities and did not understand the risks of not patching vs other responsibilities like uptime.

( I have avoided the topics related to devops and agentic owned environments. I don’t believe either of these apply in this case. )

Re:We need a modern version of Adm Hopper …

By Anonymous Coward • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

We need a modern version of Admiral Grace Hopper
We had one:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…

It was a pretty damn effective, with quite a few people who, like Grace Hopper, valued service to the country over the higher salaries they could have made in the private sector.

The DOGE clowns blew it up:
https://www.cybersecuritydive....

Re:Just like cops

By dunkelfalke • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

Insufficient training is also one of the reasons. In Berlin, even the beat cop training takes 30 months. LAPD academy trains their recruits for 6 months.

Re:Just like cops

By arglebargle_xiv • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread
Yeah but this is Kash Patel’s FBI making the claim. Who knows what the real story is. The whole thing with its vague accusations sounds a lot like scapegoating to me.