Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Whistleblower Arturo Bejar Leads Testimony In Landmark Trial Against Meta
  2. PINE64 Halts Linux Device Production Amid DRAM and EMMC Shortages
  3. Stripe Buys AI Startup OpenRouter For $7.5 Billion
  4. Amazon’s Drones Will Soon Deliver to Nearly 500 US Cities and Towns
  5. Music Publisher Round Hill Files $1 Billion Copyright Infringement Suits Against Suno, Anthropic
  6. CISA: Medusa Ransomware Hit Over 500 Critical Infrastructure Orgs
  7. Moderna, Merck Say mRNA Vaccine Prevents Melanoma From Returning
  8. X’s Algorithm Feeds Off Ragebait and Impacts Democrats More, Study Finds
  9. Army Unit Offers 4-Day Pass to Play GTA VI As Reenlistment Incentive
  10. Chinese Robotics Giant Unitree Soars In Stock Market Debut
  11. Babies Born Under Sugar Rationing Grew Into Adults With Lower Cancer Risk
  12. Physicists Entangle Quantum Memories Across a Record-Breaking 420 Kilometers
  13. Top Album Releases Linked To Rise In Fatal Crashes
  14. Cursor Launches ‘Origin’ Code Hosting Platform As GitHub Alternative
  15. Comcast Is Turning Millions of Its Routers Into Motion Detectors

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Whistleblower Arturo Bejar Leads Testimony In Landmark Trial Against Meta

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from NPR:
Meta was infused with a culture in which employees obsessed over user numbers and consistently pushed safety to the side, according to Arturo Bejar, a former employee turned whistleblower, who testified today in the landmark child safety trial against the social media company. Only one man had the ability to change that, Bejar said: CEO Mark Zuckerberg. But he didn’t. “At the end of the day, it was the company culture that Mark had created that made it so that it was practically impossible to deliver features that addressed the wellbeing and safety issues that we’ve been talking about,” he said.

Bejar is a linchpin witness for a consortium of states led by California, Colorado, Kentucky and New Jersey that sued Meta, alleging violations of consumer and child data protection laws, and that the company lied to the public about risks its platforms posed. The attorneys for the states say Meta designed Facebook and Instagram to hook young users and to keep them on site longer thanks to features such as infinite scrolling and the “like” button. Meta has denied the allegations. In his opening statement on Tuesday, attorney Paul Schmidt argued that the company was sensitive to the risks to teens, sought to address them and did not deceive the public about them. The state attorneys have not yet said if they will call Zuckerberg as a witness.

Testifying in federal court in Oakland, California, for a second day on Wednesday, Bejar, who worked on safety issues at Meta for eight years, said he interacted with Zuckerberg dozens of times, and charged that Zuckerberg was not telling the truth when he made public denials that the company put profits over safety. In particular, Bejar addressed a widely-shared Facebook post Zuckerberg made in 2021 after another whistleblower, Frances Haugen, shared internal documents with The Wall Street Journal that highlighted risks to the mental health of teens. In the post, Zuckerberg said it’s “just not true” that Meta prioritizes profit over safety and wellbeing. “Based on my experience at Meta, that is not an accurate statement,” Bejar said. […] Bejar testified, at almost every turn the company chose policies that boosted usership and revenue over safety. Safety was “not a meaningful priority,” he said.

PINE64 Halts Linux Device Production Amid DRAM and EMMC Shortages

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
BrianFagioli writes:
PINE64 has some very bad news for Linux hardware fans. PINE64 says it has no plans to produce additional Linux devices in the near future because of the ongoing DRAM and eMMC shortage. Future production will depend on component pricing after mid 2027, while existing PineNote and PineTab2 inventory could run out in roughly three months. The company says PineTime, PineVoice, and Pinecil production will continue as usual, but the outlook for its Linux hardware is much less certain.
“That’s it for this post, all in all it’s a bit bleak for the Linux devices, but in the meantime PineStore still have a great lineup of MCU powered devices which will continue to expand with more exciting devices,” the company said.

Oh no!

By drinkypoo • Score: 3 Thread

Where will I get a SBC that fails after three months now?

Isn’t capitalism supposed to fix this?

By rsilvergun • Score: 3 Thread
We have a massive shortage why is nobody stepping up to make more supply? And it’s not a short-term shortage everyone knew this was coming and we have known for a couple of years and we knew that was going to get worse and the absolute best case scenario is that it starts to get better sometime around 2029 or 2030.

If capitalism can’t even solve something this fucking simple what is even the point?

Of course the actual problem is capitalism is doing exactly what it does when it’s not regulated. Nobody wants to enter the market because they know the big three can anytime they want drastically increase production within 6 months to a year and then run them out of business. Even if you wanted to enter the memory business no bank would loan you the money because they know you’re just going to lose it all.

Capitalism needs a referee and US dumbasses fired the ref.

Re:Isn’t capitalism supposed to fix this?

By bill_mcgonigle • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

> We have a massive shortage why is nobody stepping up to make more supply?

Look up some stuff instead of just commie ranting.

Apple is testing supply from an up-and-coming DRAM supplier in China. Hynix is working on converting old fabs into a smaller process to create more fast RAM. TSMC is building a fab in Arizona. Samsung is opening a fab in Texas next year.

> the big three can anytime they want drastically increase production within 6 months to a year

Tell me you’ve never been to a fab without telling me you’ve never been to a fab.

If they could double their capacity Altman would buy *that* too. At least presume that the greedy capitalists are greedy.

> Capitalism needs a referee and US dumbasses fired the ref.

How, precisely, did they accomplish this coup in China?

Also, why not move to China, Cuba, or North Korea? They have varying degrees of central planning that should take care of your needs. Nobody wants you to be unhappy.

Re:Oh no!

By drinkypoo • Score: 4, Informative Thread

I bought a MiniPC from China instead, a GMKtec M5 Plus with 5825U, 32GB DDR4 and a 1TB NVMe SSD — for $295 right before everything went to shit. That one is out of production, but an equivalent machine is now $600. I’ve had it for over a year now with literally no problems.

The memory is 3.2 GHz, and despite being so cheap it doesn’t even report a manufacturer, there doesn’t seem to be anything wrong with it. It’s got wifi 6 (MT7922) and dual 2.5 GbE (RTL8125) and the only thing that requires even a vaguely recent kernel is the wifi. It came with Windows, and I even shrank that just in case I’m ever desperate for a real Windows machine to flash some firmware or something, but ofc I’ve never needed or wanted to.

Too bad the combination of AI bullshit and tariff fuckery has doubled the price, I’d buy another similar machine.

Stripe Buys AI Startup OpenRouter For $7.5 Billion

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Stripe is acquiring AI model marketplace OpenRouter as it pushes beyond payments into the infrastructure behind AI applications. According to The New York Times, the deal is reportedly valued at about $7.5 billion, with $1.5 billion allocated to OpenRouter’s founders. Less than three months ago the company was valued at about $1.3 billion. CNBC reports:
OpenRouter has become popular with developers seeking to use AI models, particularly those considered non-proprietary and available for free. Many of these so-called open-weight AI models stem from Chinese labs like DeepSeek and Z.ai, which have gained steam among developers for generally being more cost-efficient relative to proprietary AI models from U.S. companies like OpenAI and Anthropic.

In a blog post about the deal, Stripe noted that it’s been working with companies to “optimize their token costs and route tokens efficiently,” referring to a kind of metric used to measure AI model usage. Stripe said it’s difficult to manage AI costs relative to performance because of the rapid “pace at which models are released and repriced.” […]

OpenRouter said in a blog post that combining with Stripe will help with its overall vision of “a healthy AI ecosystem where many models thrive, where AI neurodiversity is a strength, where a lab or an inference provider with a breakthrough can reach millions of developers, and where no single model becomes the default by inertia.”
“Stripe is building the economic infrastructure for AI, and together with OpenRouter we’ll help businesses maximize profitability by routing their requests intelligently and spending their tokens efficiently,” Stripe CEO Patrick Collison said in a statement.

Closed-source software outlets called Open-yada

By Rujiel • Score: 3 Thread
are a plague on this earth

Amazon’s Drones Will Soon Deliver to Nearly 500 US Cities and Towns

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Amazon says its Prime Air drone delivery service will expand sixfold to nearly 500 U.S. cities and towns by the end of 2026, including metro areas around Chicago, Syracuse, Cleveland, Atlanta, and Boise. According to Amazon Prime Air vice president David Carbon, the service has already delivered “hundreds of thousands of packages to customers” this year, typically within about an hour. The Verge reports:
These will join 11 locations across the US where Amazon already offers drone deliveries, with each Prime Air site serving an area of approximately 175 square miles. The service aims to quickly deliver packages of up to 5 pounds or less […]. Amazon reiterated its drone safety features alongside these expansion plans, including Prime Air’s “industry-leading Detect-and-Avoid system.” That’s likely an attempt to minimize any concerns raised by the communities where the service is expanding, given these drones have already been scrutinized for crashing into cranes, internet cables, gardens, and an apartment building.

Cities?

By nospam007 • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

I doubt it.

When companies throw around terms like “cities and towns” for drone logistics, they are usually talking about sprawling suburban developments with neat, wide-open lawns, not dense urban cores.

Even with this big rollout targeting nearly 500 communities, the operational reality dictates where these things can actually land:

The Footprint Illusion:

Amazon isn’t building 500 new drone stations; they are counting every municipality touched by a regional network.

A single facility covers a massive swath of territory (roughly 175 square miles), which inevitably zeroes in on the suburbs and outer rings of places like Atlanta, Chicago, and Dallas rather than downtown high-rises.

The Landing Zone Problem: For a drone to safely drop a package (even a modest 5-pound shoebox-sized item), it needs a clear, unobstructed patch of ground free of overhead power lines, tight balconies, narrow alleyways, and inquisitive pets.

Try finding a reliable 2-meter drop zone in a dense neighborhood.
Not to mention it being a porch-pirate’s wet dream.

cnbc also reporting

By stabiesoft • Score: 3 Thread
the same but what caught my eye was “will make 1 million drone deliveries this year.” https://www.cnbc.com/2026/08/1… Well that sounds great, except even at 10 bucks/delivery that is only 10M/year. Which seems pretty low for a project that has cost this much. And is 1M deliveries even a blip on their daily deliveries? I could believe they deliver 10M pkgs per day and this is 1M pkgs per year.

Re:Cities?

By dgatwood • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

When companies throw around terms like “cities and towns” for drone logistics, they are usually talking about sprawling suburban developments with neat, wide-open lawns, not dense urban cores.

Well, yeah, but those are still cities. Almost twice as many people live in parts of cities that are not “dense urban cores”.

And the dense areas involve apartment complexes with hundreds or thousands of units and interior halls, so they’re not delivering one package to the building; they’re delivering a hundred. It wouldn’t make sense to send drones for that.

But if you can handle the suburban sprawl with drones, that’s a huge logistics win, because that’s where all the time is spent — not by somebody going to an urban-core building and dropping a hundred packages in the mail room, but by somebody going to a hundred individual houses and dropping off a hundred packages one at a time.

Air density and wind

By michael_cain • Score: 3 Thread
I live along the Colorado Front Range. The Goodyear blimps don’t fly here because of the elevation (reduces lift) and number of wind events with gusts to 60 mph. I will be curious to see if drone delivery is practical.

Music Publisher Round Hill Files $1 Billion Copyright Infringement Suits Against Suno, Anthropic

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Independent music publisher Round Hill is suing Suno and Anthropic for allegedly using hundreds of copyrighted songs without permission to train their AI systems. The company says potential damages could exceed $1 billion, arguing there is “nothing fair” about building multibillion-dollar AI businesses on copyrighted material while rights holders receive nothing. From The Hollywood Reporter:
Round Hill is a prominent music publisher whose copyrights include the Goo Goo Dolls’ “Iris,” Bonnie Tyler’s “Total Eclipse of the Heart,” the Kinks’ “Lola” and Dio’s “Holy Diver.” The company provided a list of 500 songs that the defendants had infringed upon. Round Hill said in the suits that the company plans to “amend to list potentially ten thousand or more of their musical compositions,” with those damages potentially exceeding $1 billion. “While in other cases for copyright infringement, Defendant has waxed poetic about the necessity of progress and AI’s value to society, there is simply no reason — other than rote expediency — to have that progress come at the cost of copyrights holders,” prominent music attorney Richard Busch, representing Round Hill, wrote in the suits.

Round Hill further argued that the latter "‘expediency’ arguments completely falter” when taking into account Suno and Anthropic’s significant cash valuations they’ve earned while “exploiting illicit copies of copyrighted works, including the Round Hill Works.” “There is simply nothing fair about a company using theft to build for purely commercial purposes a multi-billion dollar business while those from which they steal receive nothing,” Round Hill said.
Suno also faces a lawsuit from Universal Music Group and Sony Music Group.

Standing on the shoulders of giants

By Local ID10T • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Their argument is (financially) motivated reasoning blatantly ignoring the fact that their artists creations would not exist without the contributions of the artists who came before them.

None of this exists in a vacuum.

Training is analogous to learning. We all learn from others. This is legal.

What is not legal is reproducing and selling someone else’s work without permission (copyright infringement), or claiming someone else’s work as your own (plagiarism is also copyright infringement).

Any way for both sides to lose?

By pla • Score: 3 Thread
Can someone explain how this is a copyright issue? And I don’t mean that in the angsty teen “everything should be free” sense, I sincerely don’t get how this involves “copying” whatsoever.

AI companies may be playing fast and loose with IP, but using music for training is at worst a private performance for educational purposes. Or is the recording industry back to the good old days of claiming playing a CD is “copying” it into the air, and then our ears are “copying” into our brains? Because that’s functionally what the likes of Anthropic are doing with it.

To be clear, I’m neither an AI apologist or fanboy. I find it extremely useful at work, while still fearing it will eventually put us all in a zoo for our own protection (and that’s the good outcome).

Re: Standing on the shoulders of giants

By drinkypoo • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

We don’t know how the brain works so no it isn’t modeled on the brain.

We don’t know how learning works but the brain does things with what you’ve learned that LLMs can’t do, so it’s surely not working in the same way.

CISA: Medusa Ransomware Hit Over 500 Critical Infrastructure Orgs

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
CISA says the Medusa ransomware operation has breached more than 500 U.S. critical infrastructure organizations since 2021, up from more than 300 reported last year. The group has targeted healthcare, government, defense, manufacturing, IT and financial organizations, evolving into a ransomware-as-a-service operation that recruits initial-access brokers and uses stolen data to pressure victims into paying. BleepingComputer reports:
The three federal agencies recommended that network defenders secure their networks against the ransomware group’s attacks by mitigating security vulnerabilities to protect operating systems, software, and firmware from exploitation attempts. Security teams are also advised to segment networks to block lateral movement after compromise and to block access from untrusted origins to remote services on internal systems.

[…] “Medusa developers typically recruit initial access brokers (IABs) in cybercriminal forums and marketplaces to obtain initial access to potential victims,” the advisory says. “Potential payments between $100 USD and $1 million USD are offered to these affiliates with the opportunity to work exclusively for Medusa.”

This Is What I Expect For My Tax Dollars

By SlashbotAgent • Score: 3 Thread

The three federal agencies recommended that network defenders secure their networks against the ransomware group’s attacks by mitigating security vulnerabilities to protect operating systems, software, and firmware from exploitation attempts.

Patch your shit. That’ll be $1 billion, please.

Moderna, Merck Say mRNA Vaccine Prevents Melanoma From Returning

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Moderna and Merck say their personalized mRNA melanoma vaccine significantly reduced both cancer recurrence and spread in a late-stage trial. The treatment could reach patients as soon as next year if regulators approve it. Reuters reports:
Moderna developed the vaccine with Merck and tested it together with immunotherapy drug Keytruda, a widely used treatment for melanoma. […] This is the first positive late-stage trial result for an mRNA cancer vaccine, which trains a patient’s immune system to fight tumors by targeting specific mutations in those cells and the first such study to show that adding a treatment to Keytruda worked better than that therapy alone. Similar approaches are being tested against lung, breast and pancreatic cancers.

[…] The cancer treatment combines Merck’s Keytruda with a made-to-order mRNA vaccine from Moderna that is based on an analysis of mutations found in the patients’ own tumors. The trial enrolled 1,137 high-risk patients with stage IIB-IV melanoma that had been surgically removed. Volunteers were randomized to receive up to nine doses of Keytruda plus the personalized vaccine or Keytruda alone for about one year. The companies said no new safety signals have emerged in the trial. In January, the companies announced results of a mid-stage trial of the treatment showing that it reduced the risk of recurrence or death by 49% after five years.
Karen Knudsen, CEO of the Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, said the Moderna results could signal a new era for treating solid-tumor cancers. “The positive hit here leads us into truly this next phase in immunotherapy,” Knudsen said. “This is an auspicious start — this is where things begin.”
Moderna shares more than doubled on the news, adding about $30 billion to its market value.

Sad that a company that actually does something

By ebunga • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

I think it’s sad that once again we have a company that is providing a direct benefit to the world and they’re worth only $30b when you have shitty AI companies that make the world a worse place that are worth many times that.

How this may play out

By JoshuaZ • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
If this works well, similar methods will likely work for other cancers also. Unfortunately, since it requires an individual design for a specific person, it likely is going to not benefit much from economies of scale, so it may remain very expensive. Also, given that it uses mRNA, it is likely that parts of the US right will either refuse to use it or will try to block it. Given RFK Jr. being in the Secretary of Health, what should be a slam dunk may end up becoming an uphill battle. On the bright side, some of the anti-vaxxers seem to be ok with mRNA systems once someone already has a disease.

This is amazing news!

By 93 Escort Wagon • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

… or would be, under any other presidential administration.

Still, the rest of the world can certainly benefit from it.

Re:Sad that a company that actually does something

By quantaman • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

This is why a lot of chronic diseases will NEVER have cures. It’s more profitable to treat than to cure. Treat someone over a lifetime and milk 100k out of them. Treat someone once and present them with a 100k price tag to pay all at once and the consumer or insurance company will balk at the cost.

It’s a fun conspiracy theory, but this is actually just how biology works.

There’s basically four kinds of things that can go wrong with our bodies. Infections, mechanical issues, system errors, and cancer.

Infections we can cure by helping the body to kill off the infection, it’s only some rare stubborn ones like AIDS that are chronic like you describe.

Mechanical issues we can fix with surgery.

System errors? That’s stuff like genetic disorders where our body creates too much of hormone A or doesn’t create the proper form of protein B. The problem is in our DNA and you can’t cure it without rewriting our DNA (which we’re getting to).

And then there’s cancers, which are similar to infections, where we try to kill it (as they’re doing here), though weirdly, some research suggests treating it as a chronic issue might be better for the patients.

In either case, it’s not the fact that pharma is deciding "don’t make a pill to cure it, just find a lifetime treatment!". It’s only in the past few years that we’re reaching the point where we can actually cure things that were traditionally chronic.

Re:How this may play out

By dgatwood • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

I don’t think that’s correct? Possibly I’m misreading this, but it looks like the study involved giving two things, both the Keytruda, and a separate personalized vaccine.

You’re not misreading it. It is individualized. Different cancers express different antigens, and the mRNA vaccine needs to construct something that expresses those same antigens to train the immune system to attack them.

The nice thing about mRNA, is that it is potentially relatively cheap to synthesize mRNA strands and replicate them. It won’t be hundreds of dollars, but it won’t be millions, either. Right now, I think it’s hundreds of thousands per patient, but that will go down over time as they streamline the process of taking a sample of the tumor and determining an mRNA gene sequence that matches said cancer. And economies of scale on the equipment will also probably help.

It may also be the case that it becomes less individualized over time. At some point, we might reach the point where they have a bunch of pre-sequenced antigens that are all ready to go, and someone just keys in a list of antigens, and a piece of software spits out the mRNA sequence. At that point, it is still individualized, but with a much, much more streamlined process for generating it.

Note that I don’t work in this field, so take all of this as the opinion of an educated layperson observer. :-)

X’s Algorithm Feeds Off Ragebait and Impacts Democrats More, Study Finds

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from 404 Media:
X’s algorithm learns what you hate and shows you more of it, according to a new study just published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS). The paper, titled Value misalignment of X’s feed algorithm is a reflection of value tensions in engagement, found that the site’s algorithm prioritized engagement above all else when it generated a user’s For You Page. It also showed that X serves more ragebait to people who say they are Democrats, although the exact reason for that is unclear.
“In 2026 that’s maybe not the most surprising headline ever,” Ziv Epstein, a postdoctoral researcher at Stanford University, and co-author of the paper, told 404 Media. “So we actually dug in a little deeper to figure out why this is actually happening, and it turns out that X’s feed algorithm, like a lot of these social media algorithms, is optimized for engagement [but] it turns out that not all types of engagement are considered equally.”
The researchers found that X’s algorithm can push users toward content that conflicts with their stated values, especially when they reply to posts that anger or provoke them. Although replies accounted for just 6.8% of interactions, they appeared to carry disproportionate weight: “It’s this feedback loop of outrage baiting. The algorithm learns that you get outraged and then continues to serve more content in that direction,” said Epstein.

It’s unclear why X seems to serve ragebait to Democrats more often than Republicans. 404 Media speculates that it may be because there’s more rightwing content on X overall or that Democrats tend to engage with posts they disagree with more often. “There might be some kind of differential effects on information diets there, or it might be something more psychological about how different you know partisan identities are triggering different kinds of actions and reactions, but ultimately I don’t want to speculate too much,” said Epstein.

X’s former product chief Nikita Bier confirmed that the site had been set to favor replies. “This is no longer true,” Bier said in a post on X. “The largest contributor of seeing ragebait was the reply predictor and we were aware that angry replies were causing people to see more of that content. So last month, we gave the reply predictor a 15x boost if it’s a friend’s post — and it reduced ragebait by [an] order of magnitude.”

Facebook is atrocious this way

By Tschaine • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

My feed filled itself with political rage bait groups and pages after I took the bait from one of them. It’s pretty annoying because no matter how many times I pick “hide all from…” there is an endless supply of rage bait.

The stuff that brought me to Facebook is basically just needles in the haystack of crap at this point.

Different responses

By fahrbot-bot • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

It’s unclear why X seems to serve ragebait to Democrats more often than Republicans. 404 Media speculates that it may be because there’s more rightwing content on X overall or that Democrats tend to engage with posts they disagree with more often.

Republicans instead storm The Capital, assault police and threaten to hang the Vice President - then get pardoned by a Republican. Or conspire to kidnap governors… Yes, I’m painting Republicans with a broad brush, but a LOT of them aren’t denouncing those people and keep supporting the party.

Re:Is it ragebait, or

By Powercntrl • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Is it content they just don’t like?

The Republican Party itself has become a purveyor of ragebait. This is from the campaign website of the man who just won Florida’s gubernatorial primary:

From the State House to the US House, Byron has a proven record of standing up for our values. From defending Second Amendment rights, to protecting life, and to keeping radical woke ideology out of schools, Byron will always fight the Left’s agenda.

Look, I’m totally fine with seeing political positions that I disagree with. That’s how political discourse in a democracy is supposed to work. The example I just quoted though, is intentionally inflammatory.

Re: Is it ragebait, or

By fropenn • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

maybe Drmocrats are just angrier people. that’s what I see.

When you have values, and see those values violated, you get angry.

When you believe whatever the orange cheeto says, or when you just want to watch the world burn, what could make you angry?

Re: Anyone surprised?

By Powercntrl • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Easily observed reality shows that people that constantly block the right wing trolls and dipshits get nothing but right-wing dipshittery in their “For you” feeds, and suggestions to follow right-wing dipshits.

X’s algorithm is right-wing trolls all the way down. Hilariously, most of them aren’t even in the US.

Army Unit Offers 4-Day Pass to Play GTA VI As Reenlistment Incentive

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
A U.S. Army battalion at Fort Stewart is offering soldiers a four-day pass timed to the release of Grand Theft Auto VI if they reenlist for at least two years. The program is limited to one unit for now, but it fits the Army’s broader effort to appeal to gamers as a recruiting and retention pool. CBS News reports:
Twenty soldiers at Fort Stewart in Georgia in the Army’s 9th Brigade Engineering Battalion, part of the 3rd Infantry Division, have already chosen this incentive as part of their reenlistment, an Army spokesperson told CBS News on Wednesday. “The idea was to have a unique incentives program that connects to what Soldiers are interested in,” Lt. Col. Angel Tomko, a spokesperson for the 3rd Infantry Division, said in a statement. “The command team, in conjunction with the career counselor, wanted to get soldiers excited to reenlist.”

[…] The Army memo, which has circulated online, says any soldier who signs a reenlistment contract between Aug. 1, 2026 and Nov. 14 will be authorized for a special four-day pass designated to coincide with “the highly anticipated release of the video game Grand Theft Auto VI (GTA 6).” About 130 soldiers are currently eligible for the incentive, Tomko said. Eligible soldiers must reenlist for a minimum of two years and up to six years.

It’s a game to die for I guess

By ebunga • Score: 4, Funny Thread

Or maybe that’s just the ram needed to play the game.

Hope Rockstar doesn’t miss the release date

By Powercntrl • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

So, sign up for two years of military service and get authorized leave for 4 days to play a video game? I guess if that really is the deciding factor to enlist, you probably are just the kind of person the army is looking for.

Meanwhile, in the Navy …

By fahrbot-bot • Score: 4, Funny Thread

Sailors on the aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln get to be NPCs in GTA VI for four days, which is a step-up from current living conditions there.

Re:What a benefit!

By dgatwood • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Mod parent Funny, though “continues to be money” was a bit annoying or something. Or maybe my case is too weird or too ancient? Even worse, it was an open contract with no special incentives. (And none of that insane “Thank you for your service” garbage in those days.)

It’s a statistically correct statement, at least post-1973. When asked what the main consideration for joining was, money was the top answer, and IIRC more than half gave that answer. The military is a steady job and provides other financial-adjacent benefits, such as the G.I. Bill paying for higher education. And when there aren’t so many steady jobs out there, that makes it more compelling.

Not saying it’s the only reason, just that it is one of the larger influencing factors in how well the military is able to recruit.

Coupled with SRB for various specialties....

By couchslug • Score: 3 Thread

gets cash and adds leverage for advantageous leave use

Four days leave atop thirty days normal leave per year plus whatever specialty bonus is basically a tip. Wise troops would delay taking leave until their final enlistment is up so I did. The more I had to carry forward the better.

Not everyone gives a shit about long deployments, self for example. Troops who simply don’t care about long deployments (there are more than a few of us!) but do want to accrue leave as leverage to take leave (so their unit doesn’t look like ass for not permitting it) in large chunks can use the additional days to their advantage.

My objective from the day I enlisted was always to accrue as much leave as practical (normally 90 days/year) to carry forward to the end of my career so I could bolt three months early (plus the custom of “commanders days” where G.I.s were allowed to disappear then show up to out process than take formal leave).

I also used it accrued leave in conjunction with offering to take long leave outside the holiday season so others in my work center could spend time with their kids. These customs go back to long before I enlisted.

I do STRONGLY suggest that anyone who considers themselves at all sensitive not join the armed forces because that’s stress they don’t need.
Sensitivity and war do not go together and never did. Not everyone is suited to every career civil or military and there’s no shame in not fitting, just wisdom in
choosing wisely!

It’s not that sensitivity is a fault, it’s that it’s simply not optimal and opens the door to stress-induced discomfort and emotional damage. I knew in childhood I’d fit the Air Force which I did with the goal of retiring young and debt-free which I also did, but it’s not for everyone. The fewer young people who enlist the better for all concerned because ONLY enlistment and retention create meaningful institutional pressure to raise pay and benefits!

When you serve whatever cretinous hack our dimwit (intelligence is not a choice and is, arguably neuro-divergent!) voters self-inflict you are doing other taxpayers a favor for which you should be compensated! Uncle Sugar will get his use out of you so get your use out of him! There aren’t many “idealistic” reasons to fight for a nation (which means people) this contemptibly stupid. The price of not having (even more expensive and like the last time a social disaster) an active draft is to pay the fucking troops.

The USA really is a business, not a country. That’s just human nature.

Chinese Robotics Giant Unitree Soars In Stock Market Debut

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Chinese robotics giant Unitree surged more than 600% in its Shanghai stock market debut, marking the first mainland Chinese listing by a humanoid robot maker and a major milestone for Beijing’s robotics ambitions. The BBC reports:
Unitree, officially known as Yushu Technology Co Ltd, was founded in 2016 and now plays a key role in Beijing’s ambitions to develop advanced technology. It has become a robotics industry leader, selling devices from sensors and automated arms to four-legged and human-like machines. The firm shipped more than 5,500 humanoid robots last year as demand for the technology grows.

Unitree is one of the few companies in the sector to make money, delivering a net profit of 278 million yuan in 2025. It is a fierce rival to developers in the US as it produces robots with similar features but at lower prices. The company is based in Hangzhou, in eastern China. The region is home to a so-called golden cluster zone of robotics firms, which have benefited from huge government investments. That support helped drive a more than threefold increase in the number of Chinese robotics firms between 2020 and 2024, according to state-run China Daily.

[…] Unitree’s robot dogs start at $2,700, a fraction of the roughly $70,000 price tag for Boston Dynamics’ four-legged device, Spot. “They’re not exactly comparable because some of Unitree’s dogs are much smaller,” [said Harold Soh, a researcher from the National University of Singapore]. “But the price is a big difference.” Unitree has been selling humanoid robots since 2023, with its $13,500 child-sized G1 model hitting the market the following year. Meanwhile, major US rivals — including Elon Musk’s Tesla — have yet to start delivering rival products.

[…] Some experts expect Unitree’s market debut to be a gauge of investor appetite for the fast-growing humanoid robotics sector. The listing has given the public a rare chance to invest in a humanoid robotics company and could set a benchmark for other manufacturers, said Jack Pearson from investment firm RoboStrategy. The listing also marks a “turning point” for China’s robotics industry, as Unitree’s success comes even as the US is curbing imports of foreign-made robots, Pearson said.

Re:The US is screwed

By ArchieBunker • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

In the USA these companies maximize profits above all else. They have no long term goals or planning. Now that China is besting them on quality and efficiency all they can do is cry to daddy Trump for the ban hammer. In the 70s Japan started cranking out cheap and reliable cars and caught the makers of land yachts off guard. It happened again with Harley Davidson in the 80s who went crying to Reagan.

Babies Born Under Sugar Rationing Grew Into Adults With Lower Cancer Risk

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
A study of more than 64,000 people born around the end of Britain’s postwar sugar rationing found that those exposed to less sugar during their first 1,000 days had lower rates of five cancers decades later, including roughly 69% lower liver cancer risk and 36% lower breast cancer risk. They also “showed signs of slower biological aging” and “continued to consume less sugar and had healthier diets overall,” according to the authors of a new study published in The Conversation. From the report:
After the second world war, sugar remained rationed in Britain for several years. But in September 1953, rationing ended and people started eating a lot more sugar. Consumption nearly doubled. This meant that children born just a few months apart had very different levels of sugar exposure both in the womb and during early childhood. For our study, we used data from over 64,000 people born in Britain between 1951 and 1956. Those born earlier spent a larger share of their first 1,000 days under sugar rationing, while those born later experienced progressively less of it.

[…] What is most surprising, however, is not the cancer results or the biological markers of ageing. It’s how early-life sugar exposure continued to affect people’s diets even 50 years later. We found that people who experienced sugar rationing early in life still consumed less sugar in adulthood, around age 50. They also ate less overall, and their diets were healthier and more diverse. This suggests that the level of sweetness people are exposed to very early in life may shape their taste preferences for a long time.

Re:Or

By sg_oneill • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

So the study does actually address that , and found that indeed people who didnt eat the sugar in those first 3 years tended to consume less later in life.

Annecdotally (which isnt evidence!) that rings true to me. My mother was pretty strict on no sugar and minimal salt (in the 1970s the thinking on salt linked it a lot closer to heart disease than current thinking does which has de-emphasized that a little), and nowdays I pretty much never put it in my food and shy away from sweet food, and use pretty minimal salt.

With all that said, the study does mention that children exposed to less sugar in early childhood appeared to have longer telemeres and that there is likely the smoking gun on the early childhood / sugar link, as theres a pretty well established link between telemere length and cancer succeptibility in late life. Essentially the telemeres are the caps on the end the genomes, and the longer they are, the better protected the ends of the genome are from copying errors. Its also closely associated with the hayflick limit (essentially how many copies a cell can make before it shits the bed).

Re:Or

By Rei • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

“It suggests” if you ignore that their confounder control is terrible. First, sugar wasn’t the only restricted food in post-war Britain - there was also rationing of eggs, butter, cheese and meats that ended during the same timeperiod. So you’re not actually testing the effects of sugar consumption, now are you? Also, the early 1950s was a period of rapid change in the US, including the maturation and expansion of the NHS (founded in 1948), the introduction of new childhood vaccines, major environmental shifts (for example, the Great Smog of London in 1952 vs. the 1956 Clean Air Act). Saying “all changes = sugar” just based on birthdate seems absurd.

It’s also worth mentioning that there’s also survivorship bias - anyone who died before the study couldn’t be enrolled, and there’s also no actual linking to any maternal / childhood dietary logs. Also, the ratios of cancer differences they’re describing aren’t small, they’re massive. Are we to attribute a lung cancer difference on the order of smoking vs. nonsmoking households as being to sugar, or due to, you know, smoking (or pollution) trends not accounted for in their cohort?

A life without sugar

By zawarski • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Is not worth living.

This is not surprising

By dskoll • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Inflammation increases the risk of cancer, and sugar increases inflammation, so it’s not too surprising.

Time period, not sugar

By gurps_npc • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

This is a study of people born in a set time period at a set location.

There were LOTS of things happening at that time. Yes sugar was rationed, but there were also a lot less chemicals being made, some new chemicals started up, jet travel became common, the men had come home, but some did not. New medicines appeared. New foods became common besides sugar.

The writers of this study picked one of thousands of potential explanations and ascribed it as the cure. They have NO EVIDENCE at all that reduced sugar was the cause.

This is the WORST possible example bad studies. It’s like I looked at one of the cancer maps people make, pick a school in the center and blamed the Principal of the school for intentionally giving cancer to his students.

This study indicates Britain’s of a certain age have health benefits. It does NOT indicate sugar had anything to do with it.

Physicists Entangle Quantum Memories Across a Record-Breaking 420 Kilometers

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
alternative_right shares a report from Phys.org:
Optical fibers are already the backbone of global communication systems. Recently, however, physicists have started to explore how their functionality could be boosted further by conveying information via entangled quantum particles — potentially enabling instantaneous exchanges of information across vast distances. Such a system could eventually be the basis of a future ‘quantum internet,’ offering a level of security and computing power beyond anything possible today. In new research published in Physical Review Letters, a team led by Xi-Yu Luo at the University of Science and Technology of China in Hefei has pushed that vision further than ever, entangling two quantum memories across 420 kilometers (261 miles) of optical fiber — more than four times the previous record.

Once again

By T34L • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Entangled quantum particles do not allow for faster than light communication. They allow you to be sure that once you collapse the quantum state on one end, it has been or will be the same one on the other end too. The moment you entagle two states, you know they’re the same (or “matching”, which can also mean opposite depending on the states) without actually measuring either of them (where measuring does require destroying them).

A quantum state is like a scrach lottery ticket. You don’t know if it’s gonna win on lose until you scratch it and essentially invalidate it as a “playable” lottery ticket. Quantum entanglement allows you to “clone” tickets without actually scratching them, but you won’t know if they’re winners or losers, just that they match.

Disgusting summary

By cfalcon • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

“potentially enabling instantaneous exchanges of information across vast distances”

NO this has nothing to do with that. This is the first slashdot post in memory that should be fucking deleted. Disgraceful.

Re:Once again

By gargleblast • Score: 5, Informative Thread
Yeah this furphy comes up all the time. Entanglement is not teleportation.
Teleportation (which, let us say, is faster-than-light transmission) is: Carol writes Y therefore Ted reads Y
Entanglement is : Alice reads X therefore Bob reads X
Entanglement and teleportation are not the same. Moreso, entanglement cannot be used for teleportation..

Stop lying!

By Fly Swatter • Score: 3 Thread
instantaneous exchanges this is false unless you consider shipping a matching marble by snail mail to a friend and when they finally get to open the package they get to see the color of the marble. Where is the instant part?

Also this is a read-once-and-it-is-done scenario. That’s ok for sending a password key but this is not instant communication, this is one-way and communication as we all expect it is two-way.

Re:Disgusting summary

By votsalo • Score: 4, Informative Thread

“potentially enabling instantaneous exchanges of information across vast distances”

This is quoted from the phys.org article. It wasn’t added in the summary.

Top Album Releases Linked To Rise In Fatal Crashes

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Guardian:
The release of a new album by Taylor Swift might be a cause for celebration among her fans, but such events have also been linked to a more sombre phenomenon: an increase in fatal car crashes. The team behind a new study say it sheds light on the impact of distracted driving. Writing in the journal Jama Network Open, [Vishal Patel, first author of the study based at Harvard Medical School] and colleagues report how they focused on the release of 10 major albums, launched between 2017 and 2022, selected for having the highest number of Spotify streams over a single day. […] The team found streaming volume for the top 200 songs in the US was 43% higher on the date of major album releases compared with the days surrounding the releases — although such data does not reveal whether the music was being streamed in a car.

[…] The researchers used data from a population-based registry of fatal US motor vehicle crashes to look at the number of traffic fatalities on the dates these albums were released, as well as for the 10 days either side. After taking into account the day of the week upon which the album was released, as well as federal holidays, and time of year, the researchers found the number of US traffic fatalities showed a relative increase of 15.1% on the date of major album releases, compared with similar days either side. “This is equivalent to approximately 182 fatalities in the US attributable to the release days of the 10 included albums,” the team writes.

Patel said the release of a new album could distract drivers because accessing music is a search task, not a single button press. “You unlock the phone, open the app, find the release, read down a tracklist, tap the right song. That’s several seconds of looking at a screen,” he said, adding unfamiliar music also demands more attention, while research has suggested listening to new, high-energy music measurably degrades driving performance. The researchers add the rise in traffic fatalities was greater among certain groups — such as younger drivers, male drivers, people who were driving alone, and people driving cars with a built-in infotainment platform. The authors say the results suggest that “online music streaming through smartphones may significantly contribute to distracted driving and traffic fatalities.”

Most people should not be driving cars

By OrangeTide • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

But without decent public transportation or reliable eyes-off autonomous driving, we’re going to continue to waste money and human life on distracted driving.

While I would love to believe that getting the word out with public service announcements to improve the public’s general awareness of the risks of distracted driving, or actively reworking our training and licensing programs. The cynic in me knows in my bones that most people think they are above average drivers, and that people will feel that raising the requirements to get a license is somehow unfair.

Spotify’s UI sucks.

By devious_malcontent • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
Yeah, I’ve had this problem before, But I’m quick to blame Spotify’s UI because it sucks, when a new album releases, I do not care and the last thing I want to see when I’m driving is a pop up for it. (Yes, this has happened to me), I have a single playlist that I play all the time and if a song that’s playing that I don’t like or don’t feel in the mood for I skip it, using the physical buttons on my steering wheel, and not taking my eyes off the road, (not that Spotify’s Shuffle algorithm is any good, it’s absolute dog shit).

And before I leave, I always make sure it’s set to that playlist as I switch to alternative playlists when I’m doing other tasks, and it’s incredibly difficult to try and change playlists while driving, I learned my lesson a long time ago and I just pull over or mute the stereo entirely and sit in silence. (No, I’ve never had an accident before, but I don’t need to, to know that trying to navigate a touch screen while driving is a bad idea, even at very low speeds).

For some stupid reason as well the user interface is different per phone device, my partner hates it on a new whatever the fuck Samsung’s new flip phone is, because the seek bar is a wobbly groove for some stupid reason, and the album art is in the wrong spot and for some stupid reason they keep insisting on changing the interface because product managers have to justify their job....

I usually have it where if I’m driving with my partner, I get her to set the playlist, but she always puts her trash music on.

Google for some stupid reason also decided to give me Gemini so trying to set navigation through voice commands is an impossible task until I changed it back, it’s still not perfect but it’s better than arguing with a clanker.

Let’s do the time warp again

By Woeful Countenance • Score: 5, Informative Thread

I thought this sounded familiar: it was reported in a working paper from the NBER in February, by Harvard in March, and by The Smithsonian magazine in April. So apparently this is either the final version of a paper previously in progress, or they’re working their way up the chain of high-impact journals. They must have some good publicists. Obviously I need to find some way to work Taylor Swift into my group’s papers.

We must listen to 80’s tunes forever.

By SubmergedInTech • Score: 5, Funny Thread

If it saves even one life, it’s worth whatever it costs.

And no, I don’t mean keep releasing new songs dubbed over Genius of Love. That already happens too frequently.

Swiftie Mob

By Local ID10T • Score: 3 Thread

I am picturing cars full of Taylor Swift fans ramming and running off the road other cars that are not playing the new album on release day… Fatality!

Cursor Launches ‘Origin’ Code Hosting Platform As GitHub Alternative

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Cursor has launched Origin, a GitHub-style code hosting platform built directly into its AI coding environment. The company is initially positioning Origin as a low-risk layer on top of GitHub, keeping GitHub as the "source of truth,” but the launch landed just as a major GitHub outage highlighted growing concerns about reliability in the age of AI-generated code. VentureBeat reports:
Cursor began rolling out Origin, its own code hosting platform, to paid users on Monday morning. Roughly three and a half hours later, GitHub’s status page lit up with what became a six-hour-and-forty-two-minute global degradation — error rates near 20% across pull requests, issues and the API, and near 50% on archive and raw file downloads, according to GitHub’s incident log. Enterprise single sign-on went down with it: SAML, OIDC, SCIM provisioning and Team Sync all failed. So did Copilot.

The developer internet did what the developer internet does. “You can now host your repos in Cursor Origin and deploy to Vercel via Cursor Origin which is itself hosted on Vercel,” Vercel chief executive Guillermo Rauch posted on X. “And unlike GitHub, it’s online [smile emoji]" Asked why he was smiling, Rauch replied: “trying to make light of the situation. We ourselves are stuck because of github rn!” Matt Palmer, who works at Cursor, quote-tweeted his own company’s launch with the day’s best line: “We were going to ship this earlier, but GitHub was down.” A GitHub outage, in other words, delayed the launch of a GitHub competitor.

Product launches get locked weeks in advance, and no evidence suggests Cursor timed this one. But the coincidence did the company an enormous favor, because it dramatized the argument Origin exists to make. For eighteen years, choosing where to host your team’s source code has been the least interesting decision an engineering organization makes. Cursor is betting that AI agents have made it interesting again — and for technical decision makers, that is the real news here. Not a new product, but a new procurement question with a governance problem attached.

Name master branches “Master”

By greytree • Score: 3, Insightful Thread
If they show the woke that their reign of hateful ignorance is over and name master branches “Master” by default, they might have some customers.

How about take that retired Win 10 box .

By drnb • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
How about take that retired Win 10 box, download the git documentation, install Linux on the box and setup your own server for your LAN?

Re:Name master branches “Master”

By sabbede • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
Changing what words we use and what they mean is no courtesy. Especially when based on willful ignorance and hypersensitivity to the absurd.

Origin? Really?

By sabbede • Score: 3 Thread
But not the EA one. Not the apparel manufacturer either. Nor is it the 3d printing company. Nor the Hong Kong online retailer, the biotech company, the pharmaceutical packaging company, the materials company, the other biotech company, the custom PC company, or any of the companies on page two, three, and so forth in the search results.

Not the most original name.

Oh good

By CEC-P • Score: 3 Thread
I’m glad they named it that instead of something that was already in use for a giant technology sector product. Good research, guys!

Comcast Is Turning Millions of Its Routers Into Motion Detectors

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot
Comcast is activating Wi-Fi motion sensing on millions of compatible Xfinity gateways, allowing the routers to detect movement by measuring disruptions in signals between the gateway and connected devices. The free feature, part of Xfinity Shield, can send activity alerts through the Xfinity app and offers Home, Away, and nighttime monitoring modes without requiring separate motion sensors. The Verge reports:
Wi-Fi motion sensing is a technology that has been around for a while, but it’s only recently that it’s become accurate and reliable enough to catch on. Linksys launched a similar service in 2021, but discontinued it a few years later. Lighting company Wiz launched a line of Wi-Fi-sensing smart bulbs in 2023, and more recently Philips Hue deployed a similar radio-frequency sensing technology in its products (using Zigbee rather than Wi-Fi). Comcast’s motion sensing pairs with new modes in the Xfinity app — Home Watch, Away Watch, and Dark Watch (a night/sleep mode) — allowing you to turn sensing on or off based on your activities.

Re:user consent

By brunes69 • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Its a paid feature. You don’t get it for free.

We have had access to this in Canada for a long time but it is ridiculously overpriced so I don’t pay for it.

Re:user consent

By rsilvergun • Score: 5, Informative Thread
It’s a paid feature for you to access the data but I would be shocked if they didn’t turn it on without notifying you anywhere except the finest of fine print so that they could sell the data. If all else fails here in America they will want to give the data to the police.

Re:It’s OPT-IN

By rsilvergun • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
It’s 2026 dude. Nobody believes that anymore.

Unless you have laws and they are strictly enforced with extremely harsh penalties companies will do whatever the fuck they want and you have to suck it down. And we stopped passing those kind of laws here in America in the ‘80s when Ronald Reagan took over. The few we had left on the books we stopped and forcing when newt Gingrich started fucking up Congress. And the last of our civil rights got rendered moot when we gave up the courts to a bunch of corrupt fascists.

We are at the final line of defense as far as democracy is concerned. The voters and elections. It is possible because of Trump’s failing Health we might turn that around just barely but it’s pretty touch and go right now.

Re:user consent

By Powercntrl • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Or they’ll sell the “anonymized data”, including calculated bra sizes.

Supposedly Facebook knows everything about me. They’re running on way more specific information than just “when does he walk around his house in the evening?” You know what kind of ads I keep getting lately? Ones for a ridiculously overpriced e-scooter. I’ve also been getting ads for an 80s cover band made up of two teenagers and their father, for a tour that was in Florida a little over a week ago. It got the liking 80s pop music part right, but it’s way off on my ownership of a time machine and desire to watch Gen A musicians.

I’d be downright thrilled if marketers would actually show me ads for things I genuinely would be interested in, like if Outback ever brings back Bloomin’ Mondays. Really, the worst part about ads is that the targeting algorithm is still absolute horse shit.

Re:user consent

By reiterate • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
I think they are lying and they will use it clandestinely in an attempt to enrich themselves.