Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Microsoft Retreats In China
  2. Google’s Gemini 3.7 Flash Targets Coding and Agents With a 50% Price Cut
  3. Microsoft Is Combining Its Copilot Apps Ahead of a ‘Super App’
  4. Amazon Will Train On Twitch Streamers’ Content By Default, Unless They Opt Out
  5. Anthropic Could Be Worth $2 Trillion When It Goes Public
  6. World’s Largest 106-Foot Electric Plane Takes Maiden Flight In New York
  7. Apple Turns to Publishers For Help With Siri AI
  8. University of Michigan Drops First-Semester Grades to ‘Curb Mental Health Crisis’
  9. VA Launches Psilocybin Trial For Veterans With Treatment-Resistant Depression
  10. Scientists Create Largest 2D Map of the Universe
  11. How Social Media Spurred a Refugee Crisis Between Spain and Morocco
  12. Trump Administration Enlists Private Companies To Hack Foreign Cybercrime Groups
  13. Big Tech Wants to Harvest Your Thoughts
  14. ‘Godmother of AI’ Says Biggest AI Risk In Schools Is Students Losing the Desire to Learn
  15. US Tries to Override New York Gambling Laws, Orders Kalshi to Keep Operating

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Microsoft Retreats In China

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Microsoft has been steadily scaling back its China presence, closing at least 15 branch offices and joint ventures over the past five years as Beijing favors domestic software. U.S. export controls also make it harder to grow its cloud and AI businesses, leaving the market with relatively little economic upside. Reuters reports:
Microsoft took a major hit from the erosion of trust between Washington and Beijing, the five people said. China has since 2017 pushed the use of domestic software, which Beijing sees as more secure and whose quality is increasingly competitive with Windows and Office. U.S. restrictions, including export controls on advanced technology, have meanwhile hindered efforts to scale Microsoft’s lucrative AI and cloud businesses in China.

[…] Microsoft ultimately decided to remain because it had carved out a profitable business servicing Chinese companies like TikTok owner ByteDance, which need Western technology to manage overseas operations, according to three people familiar with the matter. The company also believed that it needed a presence to maintain access to China’s world-class engineering talent, two of them said. Microsoft had also cultivated a relationship with the government that is among the deepest of any tech company, its former China head Alain Crozier told Reuters. “Because of the geopolitics … some days it’s a little bit harder, but we never had a crisis,” he said.

A Microsoft spokesperson did not address questions about the firm’s deliberations on its China business but said it operates in a regulatory “environment that applies to every international supplier” and that it remains committed to the Chinese market. The state of Microsoft’s China business reflects market competition, regulatory demands and technological trends, the company said.

A different kind of security

By bryanandaimee • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Chinese software is “more secure” by a very narrow definition of security. It’s primarily national (Party) security they are worried about. That includes the need to spy on their own citizens. So it is intentionally insecure in almost every way that we would generally think of software security, but more “secure” for the CCP.

Decline.

By Morromist • Score: 3 Thread

I’ve noticed huge american companies are scaling back, leaving the world to China and India and others. Temu and similar companies are eating Amazon’s lunch out there. Our car companies are producing far more expensive and inferior cars and wouldn’t be able to compete internationally, but are protected by the goverment here. Airbus seems to be taking lots of marketshare from Boing. A lot of this is the result of tarriffs and the pointlessly setting fire to our international relationships we’ve built up for decades at considerable expense but I think there’s also just a sense of laziness and complacency. Stocks are going up, the american market is the biggest more lucrative one, so why bother compete internationally? Microsoft could keep going in China, but nah, there’s not a lot of profit there currently, so why bother? That’s obviously shortsited and short-term thinking, but whose incentivizing anyone to do any other kind of thinking?

Groundhog day…

By Ritz_Just_Ritz • Score: 3 Thread

This is at least the 2nd time they’ve done a retreat in China.

There has never been a level playing field there for foreign companies.

Microsoft, LOL

By RitchCraft • Score: 3 Thread

Yeah, letting China perform tech support for the DoD was probably the most boneheaded move ever. Bravo Microsoft … Bravo.

Google’s Gemini 3.7 Flash Targets Coding and Agents With a 50% Price Cut

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Google has released Gemini 3.7 Flash just three weeks after 3.6 Flash, focusing on better coding, agentic workflows, and enterprise automation while temporarily cutting API prices in half through the end of 2026. VentureBeat reports:
For enterprise developers, the more consequential story may be the combination of those intelligence gains with lower inference costs: through the end of 2026, Gemini 3.7 Flash costs $0.75 per million input tokens and $3.75 per million output tokens.

Starting Jan. 1, 2027, pricing rises to $1.50 per million input tokens and $7.50 per million output tokens. That means the current discount is temporary, but it gives teams deploying high-volume coding and business agents several months to evaluate whether Google’s claimed reductions in retries and manual oversight translate into lower total operating costs. The launch also underscores Google’s rapid iteration on its Flash line while its next flagship Pro model remains absent. […]

Google describes Gemini 3.7 Flash as its “most intelligent workhorse model yet for coding and agents.” The company says the model is better at adapting when it encounters roadblocks, clarifying intent when necessary and following instructions with greater fidelity. […] Google’s benchmarks show a large generational improvement in several software engineering tests. […] Google’s own results do not show 3.7 Flash universally displacing higher-priced competitors. They instead suggest a model that has become substantially more competitive in coding and agent workloads while occupying a lower price tier.

Re: Begun, the AI price wars have…

By barc0001 • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

> We also have a small cluster of 7900xtx for local inference when you go over your allowance

That’s actually one of the conversations I’ve been hearing at work is that ‘free’ LLMs we can self host at one of our datacenters is the long term plan once they’re Good Enough(tm). I think a lot of companies are planning the same. Medium to big corporations with large tech departments remember vividly how Broadcom screwed them on VMWare pricing and they’re not going to get caught in the same bear trap with AI. They’re already planning to be mostly to fully self sufficient - which again is going to cause a lot of those “AI will be worth XXXXXXXX” predictions to be completely and utterly wrong and kill a lot of those companies.

Microsoft Is Combining Its Copilot Apps Ahead of a ‘Super App’

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Microsoft is merging its consumer Copilot and Microsoft 365 Copilot apps ahead of a broader “super app” launch later this year. “Both personal and work accounts will be moved to the new unified app, which recycles the ‘Microsoft Copilot’ name but features an updated app icon,” reports The Verge. “The single app also means there won’t be two annoying Copilot icons in the system tray or taskbar anymore.” From the report:
The updates are intended to be a technical milestone in preparation of the “super app” Microsoft is planning to launch later this year, so this is laying the foundations of what will be changing for Copilot products. A worldwide rollout for the mobile and web apps will start in “mid-August,” according to Microsoft, with a rollout to Windows and Mac apps set for “mid-September.” Mobile app users will be prompted to download the new Copilot app, and the updates will start appearing for some Windows Insiders this week.

What changes you’ll see will depend on which Copilot apps you’re already using. Existing Microsoft Copilot users will be moved to the updated version, along with your chats and content, while Microsoft 365 Copilot app users will see “minor navigation changes,” the updated Copilot icon, and gain access to Copilot chat. If you already use both apps, Microsoft says your chats and content will be merged to a single updated Copilot app, but notes that chats, content, and data will remain separate between account types within the app.
Microsoft says enterprise security, compliance, and government controls will remain unchanged and core Copilot features will remain free, though usage limits may vary. Podcasts, Deep Research, and Group Chat content will, however, be discontinued after August 18.
The company also says Shopping and Copilot Health “may be temporarily unavailable” during the transition.

How will they break things this time around?

By Schoenlepel • Score: 3 Thread

Any bets? The eating of documents? Confidential work documents all of a sudden being suggested to your son preparing a presentation for school?

Anybody got any other ideas?

Re:How will they break things this time around?

By jhoegl • Score: 5, Funny Thread
1984 is suggested to Musks kids.

just stop

By awwshit • Score: 3 Thread

Or you could stop foisting software on users and let the users decide what they want/need.

Yo dawg

By Rendus • Score: 4 Thread

I heard you like Copilot, so I put Copilot and Copilot in your Copilot, so you can slop while you slop.

Bring together the power

By rsilvergun • Score: 3 Thread
Of Windows CE, Windows ME and Windows NT.

Amazon Will Train On Twitch Streamers’ Content By Default, Unless They Opt Out

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Twitch will begin allowing Amazon to use streamers’ content to train generative AI models by default, requiring creators to manually opt out if they don’t want their videos and audio included. The decision has drawn backlash from creators, with Twitch’s own product chief acknowledging that an opt-in system would likely attract almost no participants.

“Why is it not opt-in? That’s what everybody is spamming in chat. I get it. ‘Let me opt in versus making me opt out,’" said Twitch Chief Product Officer Mike Minton. “Well, there’s an honest answer… If this was opt-in, nobody would opt in. That’s honestly the answer.” TechCrunch reports:
For Amazon, these stream recordings are incredibly valuable, offering thousands of hours of audio and video content to help train AI models. But Twitch users worry that since creators have to manually opt out, they might be surrendering their content to train Amazon’s AI content models without even knowing it. This is especially concerning on a platform like Twitch, where creators are often recording livestreams of themselves and their voices for many hours per week.

[…] Twitch knows that its community of streamers is largely opposed to the use of generative AI, since the most prevalent generative AI products are trained on books, images, videos, and other materials scraped from the internet without consent. Even Twitch’s approach to breaking this news shows that the company is braced for backlash. Instead of telling the community that Amazon would begin training on Twitch users’ content, Twitch framed this change as "[adding] a setting that lets you opt out of having your channel content used to train generative AI content models across Amazon.”

In some cases, this created confusion among streamers about whether their content had already been fed to Amazon without their knowledge. When one user asked if their videos had already been used for training, Minton responded, “I don’t actually know the answer to that question because I don’t know what Amazon […] has done in terms of model training and what they’ve used and not used.”

“That’s honestly the answer.”

By RitchCraft • Score: 3 Thread

“Well, there’s an honest answer… If this was opt-in, nobody would opt in. That’s honestly the answer.” - Because no one wants to train your bullshit AI. Hey, here’s an idea, PAY the creators for their work to be included in your AI nonsense. Stop raping people already.

Garbage In, Garbage Out

By NaCh0 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I can’t fathom anything on twitch helping train AI except as an example of how not to speak or behave.

Re:Garbage In, Garbage Out

By RitchCraft • Score: 5, Funny Thread

They need content for the hallucinations.

Last I Saw Twitch

By SlashbotAgent • Score: 3 Thread

The last time I saw anything on Twitch it was a stream of somebody playing a game and a chat room full of utterly incomprehensible nonsense, gibberish, and emojis scrolling by at an unreadable speed.

Are they training the AI to be schizophrenic?

It blows my mind that anyone watches that shit. Yet, they seem to have an insane amount of users.

There’s no opt-out

By hdyoung • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
That’s a joke. They own the data, and they’ll bloody well use it as they please. This’ll get downmodded instantly, because some people here believe that a TOS has the same authority as the bible, the constitution, and the 10 commandments all rolled together into a holy document of absolute authority, immutable until the end of the universe. Sure, when you click that TOS box on your computer, suddenly the entire world will bend the knee and comply. Hashtag eyeroll.

None of the AI companies have complied with their TOSs. They’re basically unenforceable for individuals. “Opting out” is privacy-theatre. The AI companies are in a brutal war to build and train their models. The’ve hacked their competitors and flagrantly violated every copyright law on the planet. They’re not gonna let some vaporous pinky promise TOS get in the way.

Anthropic Could Be Worth $2 Trillion When It Goes Public

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from the Financial Times:
Anthropic investors expect the AI startup to float at a valuation of $2 trillion or more in October, a dizzying figure that would eclipse SpaceX and make the AI lab’s debut the largest-ever initial public offering. Half a dozen of the company’s backers told the FT that Anthropic’s rapidly rising revenue would enable it to more than double its current valuation in a planned autumn float. A listing at that level could unlock billions of dollars in gains for the five-year-old company’s early investors but would also test public markets that are growing more nervous about the AI boom.

Anthropic’s backers say booming demand for the lab’s advanced AI models and tools justifies their lofty expectations. Investors expect the Claude maker’s annualized revenue to be between $100 billion and $120 billion by the end of 2026 — using the startup’s preferred measure, which infers full-year sales from recent performance — up by more than 10 times over the course of 2026. “If Anthropic is growing 800 percent a year, you’d think at the incredibly low end they would trade at 30 times [revenue],” said one investor in the group. “That would make them a $3 trillion company.”
According to Bloomberg (paywalled), Anthropic is currently in talks to acquire Decart AI for roughly $6 billion.

“Decart develops world models alongside software designed to lower AI training expenses by improving how efficiently chips are utilized,” reports Quartz. “That capability could allow Anthropic to get more out of its current infrastructure as demand grows. If the deal closes, Decart’s team would join Anthropic’s inference and performance organization.”

Heavy Lifting

By crunchy_one • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
The word “could” in the headline does so much heavy lifting.

Re:Heavy Lifting

By Junta • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

While Anthropic is at least more substantial than other players, this *absolutely* is suspiciously heavy in this summary.

They anticipate that their revenue *could* be $100 billion if they extrapolate some revenue interval of the entire year, and that they will follow up with an unspecfied duration of year over year growth rate of 800%… Which just is an absurd assumption when the starting point is $100 billion.

They’re winning by default

By CEC-P • Score: 3, Informative Thread
They’re winning by simply not being their competition.
You’ve got an actually mentally ill guy who doesn’t know or care what a budget is, running OpenAI into the ground.
Elon Musk is basically a clueless A.D.D. toddler that doesn’t know how the world works and Grok can’t be propped up solely by its ability to not be heavily liberally biased
Copilot is just an Indian guy hiring more of his Indian friends, whether they’re qualified or not, to make vibe-coded garbage that doesn’t work because the design is an overcomplicated mess.
And nobody trusts anything from China.
Who’s left? Yeah, throw your money at them. Plus, they made Mythos, an actually useful product that people actually need.

Re:Wages to Token Purchases

By nightflameauto • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

What business model recoups all of that investment at a profit? The one with billions of users?

The one with most of our wages redirected to payments for Anthropic tokens. Its the ultimate outsourcing.

Not just our wages, though that’s the beginning of the dream. The real dream is creating a perpetual profit machine for the owners while needing absolutely no actual humans, and no need for actual products or commodities involved. Just a bunch of digital bits floating this way and that, creating waves of profit for virtual shipments of nothing. It’s a beautiful vision of the future if you’re one of the folks directly involved in it. It’s a dystopic nightmare that ends the illusion the general population ever had any value at all to the owner class and the politicians once and for all, leaving most of us to try to sort out how to live once the economy is completely separated from its need for us as employees or consumers.

Re:Wages to Token Purchases

By JaredOfEuropa • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
I’d love to buy into SpaceX the space company. Not so much into SpaceX the AI company. Their valuation is based on xAI and X for a large part, and their outlook on their total addressable market is over 9/10ths AI - a market in which they are at the moment not all that well positioned.

World’s Largest 106-Foot Electric Plane Takes Maiden Flight In New York

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Heart Aerospace’s X1, billed as the world’s largest battery-electric aircraft, completed a 27-minute maiden flight in New York using more than 1 MW of power and only about $5 worth of electricity. The 106-foot-wingspan demonstrator is a precursor to the company’s 30-seat hybrid-electric ES-30 regional airliner, targeted for service in 2031. Interesting Engineering reports:
Developed by Heart Aerospace, the X1 demonstrator lifted off from Plattsburgh International Airport in New York on Wednesday, August 12. The piloted aircraft remained in the skies for about 27 minutes and made it to a 1,100-foot altitude above ground level (AGL). According to the Swedish aerospace company, the aircraft has a wingspan of 106 feet (32 meters). It’s additionally 76 feet (23 meters) long and has a takeoff weight exceeding 25,000 lbs (11,340 kilograms).
“With the first flight of X1, Heart Aerospace has demonstrated electric flight at the scale of a commercial airliner,” said Anders Forslund, Heart Aerospace founder and CEO. “Electric commercial aircraft have the potential to fundamentally reshape airline economics and, ultimately, lower the cost ofÂair travelÂfor passengers.”

“This is at the heart of our vision for abundant air travel, with electrification enabling more affordable, frequent, and cleaner air service to and from airports closer to home.”

You can watch the first flight on YouTube.

So…

By greytree • Score: 3 Thread
What happened to all the smaller 106-foot planes ?

Apple Turns to Publishers For Help With Siri AI

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Apple is reportedly negotiating multi-year deals with news publishers to give its redesigned Siri access to current news and other information, with payments potentially tied to how often publishers’ content is used. The talks come as Apple prepares to launch its long-delayed Siri AI later this year, after partnering with Google to use distilled Gemini models. Engadget reports:
[The Wall Street Journal] did not reveal the specific publishers Apple reached out to, but did note the company has proposed structuring payments around a variable compensation plan, which would see it pay those organizations when their content is used. By contrast, most large AI labs like OpenAI have typically offered guaranteed fees in exchange for broad access. According to the The Journal, Apple has paid publishers for access to their content in the past as part of earlier agreements that saw the company secure AI training rights.

University of Michigan Drops First-Semester Grades to ‘Curb Mental Health Crisis’

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
“In order to salve the mental health of freshman students, the University of Michigan has implemented a Pass/No Credit system for new students to improve their mental health,” writes Slashdot reader Ol Olsoc. “The process, called ‘Grade Covering,’ is aimed at helping with the mental health crisis that students face by lessening grade pressure.” Axios reports:
U-M’s College of Literature, Science and the Arts plans to replace first-semester letter grades on freshmen’s transcripts with pass/no-credit marks, tentatively beginning in fall 2027. Professors would still assign grades, but they wouldn’t appear on external transcripts or count toward students’ GPAs.

U-M says the idea, known as “grade covering,” could help students adjust to college, take academic risks and "embrace the joy of learning.” University spokesperson Chris Sebastian tells Axios that LSA faculty, staff and students will continue shaping the pilot, with more details to come this fall.
“While I am sure that there is some pressure on freshman students, one of the best ways of dealing with pressure is enduring it and overcoming it, not attempting to shield people from it,” comments Ol Olsoc.

The fallout of compulsory education

By PseudoThink • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Our system of compulsory education does a truly remarkable job of stripping the joy of learning from students early and thoroughly. I’m a high school teacher and at the beginning of each semester, I survey each of my classes to see which students want to be there. Almost none of them do, even the high-performing ones. Making education (or anything) an obligation is very effective for framing it as such, instead of an opportunity.

Re:the solution to “the mental health crisis”

By nightflameauto • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

It crazy, some people will want to protect kids from literally everthing and then expect them to wake up one morning magically equipped to deal with the world.

This helps lead to adults that crave authoritarianism because they think some “parent” needs to solve the crises of living for them. There are those of us who have seen this coming since the “never tell a child no” trend started some thirty plus years ago, and have been wondering if society will wake up to the idea that raising children involves teaching them how to deal with reality, not just softening every blow until they move out, then wondering why they aren’t equipped to handle living on their own.

I really don’t think preventing people in college from getting a fair assessment is going to help this situation. For some individuals, not getting anything other than pass/no will stress them out because they won’t know if they barely passed, or if they passed with flying colors. Maybe someone can twist this into something about equality, but I still think it’s the wrong direction at the wrong point of life. These kids are going to graduate and wonder why their boss’s in their first jobs are so mean to them for expecting something other than just barely skating by with minimum requirements sorta/kinda met. And everybody’s gonna be confused as to why..

Re:the solution to “the mental health crisis”

By SvnLyrBrto • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

I would offer a real-life counterpoint to this being helpful.

I was actually one of those kids who breezed through high school with high marks without really having to try and then got a big shock when college actually turned out to require real effort and studying. Dropping the actual grades for pass/fail would have been the WORST thing to do. I was doing C and D work my freshman year and masking that behind nothing more than a P would NOT have been the wakeup call I needed to get my shit together and actually work for my grades. And it worked. Those Cs and Ds motivated me to get my shit together and accept that everything doesn’t just come naturally and after that first semester the first year I never got less than a B, and pulled mostly As.

Everyone is unique and YMMV of course. But I really don’t see where sugarcoating the truth and not acknowledging sub-par performance would have helped me improve.

Mental Health Crisis???

By SlashbotAgent • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Why is there a mental health crisis?

Anxiety over the first days of university is real, and common, and nothing new. It’s never been a mental health crisis before with everybody getting and owning grades. So why is it a mental health crisis now?

Fix the problem. Don’t just cover it up.

Re:I think it may be a good idea…

By LordHighExecutioner • Score: 5, Funny Thread

4.0 GPa is actually a lot of pressure!

VA Launches Psilocybin Trial For Veterans With Treatment-Resistant Depression

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Longtime Slashdot reader sbinning shares a press release:
The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs announced the launch of a new clinical trial to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of psilocybin to treat major depression in Veterans, including those with concurrent PTSD. The new trial comes after a recent executive order on “Accelerating Medical Treatments for Serious Mental Illness,” which aims to increase clinical trial participation and accelerate innovative research models and drug approvals for psychedelic drugs.

[…] The randomized, controlled trial will enroll Veterans diagnosed with treatment-resistant major depressive disorder, with or without concurrent PTSD, and will compare outcomes between two psilocybin dosage levels. The study will also assess participants’ levels of depression before and after treatment, tolerability of side effects, and overall patient-reported depression. […] In addition to this trial, VA is involved in 20 active clinical trials focused on psychedelic therapies for mental health conditions. All VA research — including research into psychedelics — is conducted under strict safety protocols and in full compliance with federal guidelines.

About time too

By Bruce66423 • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

It’s clear that these psycho active drugs should have the same status Electro-Convulsive therapy - to be resorted to when nothing else works. The willingness to use ECT but not these chemicals is a prejudice driven mistake.

Re: About time too

By bloodstar • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
At this time, Transcranial Magnetic Stimularion (TMS) has shown similar positive benefits as ECT without the brutal side effects of ECT. I believe that TMS is now favored over ECT for initial use despite slightly lower remission rates, mostly because TMS has much milder side effects and people are less likely to quit mistreatment. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/a…

Re:Good, Bad, and Ugly

By ArchieBunker • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Sounds like the VA needs better funding. Amazing how little the government cares for troops after they come back fubar. The entire VA staff can’t be incompetent either. Most probably genuinely want to help people but are overwhelmed and underpaid. Plenty of money being thrown at departments of the government that don’t help anyone.

Re:Good, Bad, and Ugly

By DerKlempner • Score: 5, Informative Thread

However, the VA is staffed by health professionals who are there because they can’t cut it in private practice.

Well, if that’s not a load of horseshit, then I’ve never seen a horse OR shit.

My own anecdotal evidence aside (as I work in a VA hospital), studies have been done to show that "[t]he VA often (but not always) performs better than or similarly to other systems of care with regard to the safety and effectiveness of care”. Or how about the fact that a “nationwide Medicare survey…found that veterans rated Veterans Affairs hospitals higher than private health care facilities in all 10 categories of patient satisfaction”.

Doctors are not working for the VA “because they can’t cut it in private practice”. Many of the health professionals I know at the VA work there because they are either former military themselves, or they feel a civic pride in giving back to those who served. The idea that the VA gives substandard healthcare is not only extremely false, but a lie that needs to be corrected.

Re:If successful and it removes a VA disability cl

By sabbede • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
I guarantee you that most of these people would rather be functioning members of society than emotional cripples going mad while on VA benefits. My nephew wants to work, but his PTSD makes it incredibly difficult. Though in his case he’s going to end up 100% disabled anyway due to chemical damage.

I’m hopeful that he can get into the trial and at least be able to see fireworks without going into sniper mode.

Scientists Create Largest 2D Map of the Universe

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
After 13 years of observations and data processing, astronomers have released the largest two-dimensional map of the universe ever assembled, “offering a sweeping new view of nearly 4 billion celestial objects across roughly three-quarters of the sky,” reports Space.com. From the report:
The new map, created by the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) Legacy Imaging Surveys team, contains a staggering 5.6 trillion pixels and combines more than 263,000 telescope exposures collected over more than a decade. The observations span visible and near-infrared wavelengths, providing an enormous portrait of stars, galaxies and other cosmic phenomena across the sky, according to a statement from the National Science Foundation (NSF) NOIRLab.
“It’s part of the fabric of astronomy research now,” David Schlegel, co-lead of the Legacy Surveys and a scientist at the U.S. Department of Energy’s Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, said in a statement. “When you’re working with astronomical objects today, you often start by pulling up the Legacy Imaging Viewer to see what you’re looking at.”

Flat Earth Society indoctrination

By thesjaakspoiler • Score: 4, Funny Thread

They are trying to make us believe that the Universe is flat too!
Don’t fall for it, even though your phone screen is flat too.

2D Map of the Universe

By fahrbot-bot • Score: 3, Funny Thread

Khan would love this. I heard, “his pattern indicates two-dimensional thinking…”

Let them have their moment

By Sneftel • Score: 4, Funny Thread

2D map of the universe

Oh geez. Listen, nobody tell them yet, okay? They worked really hard on this.

Think i saw this before

By Slashythenkilly • Score: 3 Thread
As a plot device for the movie Time Bandits. If you hear any rumblings in your closet or walls pushed out, the supreme being will be through shortly to tidy up.

How Social Media Spurred a Refugee Crisis Between Spain and Morocco

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from The New York Times:
Two days before tens of thousands of migrants surged into Ceuta, one of Spain’s enclaves on Morocco’s northern coast, a newspaper there posted a video on TikTok and Instagram showing two young women walking in the city in wet suits, their hair still damp. The posts didn’t say so explicitly, but the implication was clear: The women had just swum across the border from Morocco. “Ceuta can’t take it anymore,” the newspaper, El Faro de Ceuta, declared in the posts. On the other side of the border, the video resonated very differently. Cropped and reposted in Arabic, the video seemed like an invitation. The women were smiling, flashing peace signs and thumbs up and, most of all, walking around freely. The video seemed to legitimize rumors that had percolated for weeks on social media suggesting that a recent ruling by Spain’s Supreme Court meant migrants who arrived illegally by sea could stay in the country. As one account on Facebook put it, falsely, “Ceuta is turning into an open gate,” when in fact migrants still faced expulsion after a judicial review. The responses to the posts about the swimmers were a critical part of a cascade of disinformation that experts described as one of the starkest instances in which social media contributed directly to a real-world tragedy.

Re:Free Money, Free Housing and a Free Miele

By test321 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Those immigrants who enter Europe through Africa don’t come on the premise that they get everything for free. They come on the premise that 1) anything is better than misery in their African hellhole, including rape and death that they have to expect on their way, and 2) if lucky enough, they’ll be able to a hardworking, normal paying job like cleaning shitters in the airport or piling bricks, which will give them dignity, and even the ability to send a bit of money to their unfortunate family members who were too afraid to follow them.

Social engineering.

By engineer37 • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
This is a social engineering tactic: create a video to stir up anti-immigrant feelings in one country, then turn around and use the same video to encourage immigration to the country that you just encouraged anti-immigrant feelings in, with the resulting political crisis being the goal.

I don’t want to dive into politics here, my goal with posting is to point out that this was an intentional social engineering tactic used to cause this situation, and it was wildly effective. One video caused a political crisis in multiple countries including infighting between those countries. Again, putting the politics aside, think about the cost effectiveness of this tactic. You produce one video, pay maybe two actors, maybe some camera people, and for the price of a small TV ad you cause a political crisis involving multiple countries, including undermining or worsening some relationships between countries.

Personally, I feel like this is a lot of what the internet is used for these days, and it kinda depresses me. I remember when the internet was just people with their own little webpages posting random crap. Today, it’s a sophisticated tool used for propaganda, conflicts between countries, disinformation, you name it. It’s not just countries doing this sort of thing, but companies too. Everyone is trying to manipulate your opinion, and the opinions of entire populations. Gone are the days when the internet was by people, for people. Now it’s just a tool used for stuff like this.

Re: Free Money, Free Housing and a Free Miele

By Anonymous Cward • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Considering that just about every website which facilitates any kind of public facing user-to-user communication is what politicians call social media (which would also technically include Slashdot, decades old random PHPBB forums and sites like Newgrounds) I think all this blaming of social media instead of naming and shaming the specific commercially operated websites responsible for the tragedies, needs to end.

Otherwise, if we are going to blame anything and everything, the argument might as well be microplastics.

Re: Free Money, Free Housing and a Free Miele

By yuvcifjt • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Although exaggerated and hyperbolic, the general premise is true.

I’ve lived in various nations, including for a while in Morocco (near the capital Rabat, and a smaller village north of Kenitra).

Many people see the west as a role model of equality, justice, employability, and money. It’s only the very wealthy in Morocco that enjoy fairness as they can give corruption. For the rest, they want to escape due to: -

1. Fairness and justice
2. Employment
3. Healthcare and equality

Morocco has virtually no healthcare system (mostly a facade), and almost all medicines are imported at 2x/3x the cost.

Re:Social engineering.

By znrt • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

The question is who and why? What if it was a test and not some random event?

here are some clues:

this is not an unprecedented event, it has happened in the past but never at this scale.

i’ve seen images of trucks packed with migrants unloading them near the border, and moroccan border policie directing them towards the crossing. even if those images were out of context, it is simply not plausible that around 60.000 people could traverse morocco and approach the border without moroccan authorities noticing and at least warning their spanish counterparts. so at the very least morocco has been acquiescent.

also note that the vast majority of migrants weren’t moroccan, they came from far further south.

so this could have been morocco just “offloading” a migration problem to spain, either just to avoid dealing with it or as a political move or signal.

over the past months, though, the current spanish government had been the most critic country in europe of israel’s actions in gaza/lebannon and us attacks on iran, refusing to let us military bases to be involved in them. these actions were likely just aimed at appeasing domestic public opinion, overwhelmingly so in the “left”, but this nevertheless caused the ires of zionists both in israel and the us, from protests and threats by ambassadors to trump-social rage sprees and threats.

mid july the “u.s. house appropriations committee report” stated out of the blue that “ceuta and melilla are located in moroccan territory” and “ecouraged diplomatic engagement between morocco and spain on their future status”. these statements caused quite a bit of ruckus in spain but were later “clarified and retracted”.

during the events, several high profile zionist accounts (government, mossad, celebrities) mocked spain on social media over these developments.

while morocco and spain have a long history of tensions themselves the moroccan subservience to usa and israel is also well known, so it isn’t at all implausible that in this case they acted on their request. ofc there is no proof of that.

also note that ceuta is not included in shengen, and influx of migrants into ceuta does not mean that they can simply pour into europe. they still have to cross the strait and cross the spanish border. the small portion of them that didn’t voluntarily head back to morocco the next day are (last i checked) still stranded in ceuta.

(which means that meloni’s move to close italy’s borders was just political theatre … this might be unrelated opportunism, but could as well have been suggested by other interested parties)

Trump Administration Enlists Private Companies To Hack Foreign Cybercrime Groups

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
The Trump administration today unveiled a new program that will allow vetted U.S. companies to conduct cyber surveillance and offensive cyber operations against foreign transnational criminal organizations. A presidential memorandum signed August 12 directs the National Coordination Center to establish and manage the program, expanding the government’s fight against cybercrime by tapping the technical capabilities of the private sector. It builds on a March executive order that called for greater private-sector involvement, but goes significantly further by establishing a formal operational framework for the initiative.

The White House argues that American companies possess a “critical offensive cyber advantage” whose capabilities have “historically been underutilized” in efforts to identify and disrupt criminal networks operating online. There are two broad categories of authorized activity. “Cyber Surveillance Operations” can involve secretly accessing foreign information systems without authorization to gather intelligence, including information that could later be used for offensive operations. “Cyber Effects Operations,” meanwhile, can result in the “manipulation, disruption, denial, degradation, or destruction” of information systems, networks, or infrastructure.

It’s worth noting that companies will not be free to launch their own operations. The memorandum requires program officials to “review every cyber operations package and provide written approval and direction” before a participating company can act. Operations that could cause death or serious injury, or “rise to the level of use of force or armed attack under international law,” are classified as “Critical Outcomes” and cannot be approved through the standard process. The program includes safeguards requiring companies to halt and report operations that unintentionally affect U.S. persons or systems, as well as any imminent threats to critical infrastructure.

Re:Privatizing the NSA

By caseih • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

And even if they do win, they will not be able to remove them. Trump really knows what he’s doing, embedding loyal and deeply ideological people deep into the state institutions. He always talked about the deep state conspiracy. It never existed before, but does now. Dems will have to essentially do what Trump did (rule like a king) to undo it all. Either way it doesn’t bode well for the future of the Republic. The United States will live on in some form, but it won’t be at all like it was before Trump barring some miracle.

It’s a bit like the fall of Rome. Few people alive during those times would have recognized what was happening, and many were probably in denial, and did not see any sudden “fall”. It is only years after the fact can we look back and clearly point to specific things that mark the change and decline.

Re:Privatizing the NSA

By sit1963nz • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Trump..no, Trump has no idea what is going on. Trump is just a useful idiot. Koch Brothers and other billionaires Ala project 2025, absolutely, they are in control.

Re: Privatizing the NSA

By fortfive • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The constitution only ever means what you and four friends on scotus say it does. It’s only a sacred document to the extent that most of us honor it that way.

Abject stupidity at work

By gweihir • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Also note that when (not if) they hack the wrong target, these people become criminals. That is a primary reason why warfare and offensive intelligence operations never get handed to the private sector.

Obviously, “Hacking back” is abysmally stupid as well, because everybody uses hacked machines belonging to other people as proxies, often long chains of them. Hence it is pretty much impossible to not do massive collateral damage. And as to the changes of success? Well. How many of these attackers have been identified so far and how many are in prison? Wight, basically a tiny number. Because this approach does not work.

Re:Privatizing the NSA

By gtall • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Hell, it isn’t even private anymore. He’s conscripted the FBI as the new Geheime Staatspolizei*. And his goons are running ICE, where now they are going to buy gloves that can inflict an electric charge on anyone they grab (think about that, here in America, yet). His justice dept. has lost the Presumption of Regularity. That is where judges presume the Fed. Gov. wasn’t lying their asses off on bringing charges against people and organizations. It took 100 years to build that trust, and la Presidenta destroyed it in 1.5 years. Even the grand juries are now suspect to the point where criminal defense lawyers are asking for jury transcripts. It seems the grand juries have been misled by prosecutors. In a grand jury, there are no defense lawyers, the government prosecutors can say anything they like. Up to now, the justice dept. abided by strict rules. No longer, and some judges have cottoned on to this. Other judges appointed by la Presidenta routinely ignore the law to lick his boots.

If you want an example of the way the justice dept is being misused by la Presidenta, look at the former Olympian kayaker, David Hearn, who was run in for picking up a piece of the reflecting pool liner. Eventually the case fell apart with the U.S. prosecutor Janine Pirro U.S. Attorney. for DC (la Presidenta bootlicker from FOX) accusing the Interior dept. under Doug Burgum (another la Presidenta bootlicker) of lying to the Justice Dept. The Justice Dept. dropped the case due to lack of evidence.

That, however, left la Presidenta with his matzo balls hanging out there since he claimed the fellow used a box cutter, etc. and destroyed the liner. So now he has Pirro convening a “special grand jury” to find something, anything, with which to charge Hearn. He does not care whether it is backed up by evidence. That, in a nutshell, shows how he views the justice dept., i.e., as a corruptible arm of his retribution campaign against anyone who shows him to be gormless** git***.****

* Geheime Staatspolizei is the long name for the Gestapo.

** gormless: lacking intelligence, common sense (I picked that up from Harry Potter, excellent word)
*** git: foolish, silly, or unpleasant person (I tend to follow the “unpleasant person” reading given that it is la Presidenta....also picked up from Harry Potter)
**** The pool liner was misapplied by his campaign contributor’s company (which does something or other....it is immaterial). Even the Park’s Dept. had to admit the misapplication.

Big Tech Wants to Harvest Your Thoughts

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Wired reports that consumer neurotechnology is rapidly moving from the lab into workplaces and homes, with companies including Apple, Meta, and Snap developing products that can monitor or interpret brain activity. Researchers warn that as these systems improve, neural data could become the next major privacy battleground. Some neuroscientists are already calling for a series of core rights, coined “neurorights,” that protect “mental privacy,” “identity,” and personal “agency.” Here’s an excerpt from the article:
Over the past two decades, researchers using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), which tracks the iron in the hemoglobin supplying oxygen to neurons, have been building up increasingly detailed maps and inventories of the mammalian cortex. Thanks to huge advances in machine-learning artificial intelligence — computer algorithms that are able to sort through enormous amounts of information and use statistical methods to make classifications and predictions — fMRI scans can now be used to identify everything from depressive thoughts to the nuanced feelings of envy and schadenfreude. Other algorithms have been able to accurately piece together reconstructions of movie clips watched by subjects, just by analyzing their brain scans; or have detected, in probing the brain activity of swing voters in the US presidential election, responding to photographs and videos of presidential candidates, which candidates provoked anxiety or even disgust, and which elicited positive responses or feelings of empathy.

In just the last few years, neuroscience researchers have progressed from decoding images and emotions as they play across the cortex to sounds, words, phrases, and even language. In 2023, in a remarkable demonstration of this emerging technology, a woman called Ann Johnson, who had been paralyzed for 18 years by a brain-stem stroke, was able to speak again through the insertion of a grid of 253 electrodes onto the surface of her brain, which translated her neuronal signals into sentences, in real time, at a rate of 78 words per minute (just about half the speed of standard conversation). The research team at the University of California, led by neurosurgeon Edward Chang, had combined this brain-computer interface with an animated avatar of Johnson’s head, which spoke in her own voice, as reconstructed from a recording of a 15-minute toast she had given at her wedding. Just as the avatar’s mouth spoke Johnson’s words as she thought them, so its expressions were similarly influenced by the nuances of her brain activity, which turned her thoughts about facial gestures into displays of emotion — from smiles to pursed lips and frowns.

[…] The more invasive the recording equipment, the richer and more detailed the data. Surgical interventions are at the vanguard of neuroscience and remain very rare — fewer than 100 people on the planet have brain-computer interfaces like Johnson’s embedded beneath their skulls. Yet almost inevitably, a concerted trickle-down effect is occurring. In the summer of 2023, a team at the University of Texas demonstrated that they could use fMRI to translate brain scans into words and sentences, after subjects listened to 16 hours of the storytelling podcasts The Moth Radio Hour and The New York Times’ Modern Love to train an AI model. When the subjects then listened to new podcasts, the algorithm was able to convert the gist of what they heard, as it manifested in their brains, into words, phrases, and sentences that roughly captured the stories. As the team’s lead computational neuroscientist, Alexander Huth, put it in an interview with Science, “Our thought when we actually had this working was, ‘Oh my God, this is kind of terrifying.’" Now noninvasive, wearable brain scanners are beginning to proliferate beyond the lab, making their way into our workplaces and, through the vast global consumer market, into our homes too.

Re:Zero chance of success

By Smonster • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
I think that misses the point. What if the cops or some judge orders you to wear one in order to extract information or control behavior? We should have laws to explicitly protect people from such things. Right now if you don’t want to help the government the worst thing they can legally do is temporarily jail you for contempt. This would take things to a whole other level.

Braains!

By Local ID10T • Score: 3 Thread

/zombie

animals

By awwshit • Score: 3 Thread

Put one on a dog.

‘Godmother of AI’ Says Biggest AI Risk In Schools Is Students Losing the Desire to Learn

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Fei-Fei Li, aka The Godmother of AI, says the biggest AI risk in education may be students losing the motivation and agency to learn, rather than simply using the technology to cheat. She argues against banning AI outright, saying it can be valuable when used to support engaged students instead of replacing the thinking and struggle that learning requires. Techspot reports:
Speaking on an episode of the science podcast Huberman Lab this week, Li talked about the fears around how students are using AI. “The absolute bad outcome is that our young generation, their agency and human-level motivation of learning and living is taken away by tools,” the ImageNet inventor warned. “It should not be taken away by humans nor should it be taken away by machines.” If we see a generation of graduates who have completely relied on AI without actively trying to learn anything for themselves, they risk leaving education without having “properly developed the brain,” Li said.

[…] Li certainly isn’t advocating for a complete ban on students using AI. She believes it can genuinely help struggling students who are already engaged in their learning. Li herself noted how she struggled with organic chemistry as a premed student, when teaching assistants and professors didn’t have enough time to answer every question. While there’s no obvious solution, Li says we need to find a way to keep children and students’ motivation and agency. “Let’s find a way to give them the access and the right way of using these tools,” she said. Li added that if AI is used properly in education, it could make the students of the future “way smarter than us because they are superpowered.”

Re:Schools are designed to sort students

By Locke2005 • Score: 4, Informative Thread
Our modern school system was initially designed to train good little workers for boring, repetitive assembly line work. That’s why they emphasis rote memorization instead of creativity. Art classes may be an exception to that rule, that’s why art teachers are looked down on by the rest of the faculty members.

Re:Schools are designed to sort students

By usedtobestine • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

The cost of higher education increased to absorb the money available to higher education. If the government stopped guaranteeing student loans, the cost of college in the U.S. would crash.

No child left behind? No. Child left behind.

By Local ID10T • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

You cannot force someone to learn. You can only provide the opportunity.

As early as possible, expose children to reading, writing, nature, science, sports, art, crafts, etc. Show them what is possible before peer pressure convinces them that its “dumb” to learn things. Then give them the opportunity to learn, to pursue their interests. But stop trying to force it. Teach the basics to all the children. Then let the ones who want out.. opt out.

We don’t all need a college degree. High school should not just be college prep. It should allow for different paths.

Since when did school children have a desire

By Tony Isaac • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

I was a student who actually did want to learn. That fact made me an outcast. Almost no schoolkids wanted to learn, and the fact that I did, made me “weird” and a “nerd” (a term that was *not* nice thing to say about someone in the 70’s).

Kids have always been lazy about learning, most do it only because they have to. AI didn’t do that to them.

Re:Block AI in schools

By Culture20 • Score: 5, Informative Thread
Wikipedia was “banned” in schools because it’s not a primary source. Just like how all other encyclopedias were banned from being listed as sources for papers. You’re supposed to use the encyclopedia as a link to the primary source. Encyclopedias were just pre-Internet search engines for books, usually listing a little summary. Wikipedia being on the internet makes it convenient, but no different than book encyclopedias with regard to how papers should list their sources.

US Tries to Override New York Gambling Laws, Orders Kalshi to Keep Operating

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot
The CFTC has ordered Kalshi to keep operating in New York, claiming the state’s lawsuit against the prediction market created a “market emergency.” They said it acted “to ensure market stability” and "ordered the exchange to continue to operate in accordance with the Commodity Exchange Act’s Core Principles.” Ars Technica reports:
The market emergency alleged by the CFTC is that New York Attorney General Letitia James sued Kalshi on July 31. James’ lawsuit seeks a court order to permanently enjoin Kalshi “from operating an unlawful gambling business” in the state. The lawsuit also demands that Kalshi “make full restitution to customers who have engaged in betting” and pay financial penalties.

“New York intends to make event contract derivatives waste away under its iron curtain of state gaming laws before the courts get the chance to issue final rulings,” CFTC Chairman Michael Selig said yesterday. “Congress did not intend for derivatives exchanges to be regulated under a patchwork of state gaming laws… New York has no business regulating these interstate financial markets. The commission is required by law to ensure order in these markets, and that is what we have done today.” […]

The CFTC says it alone has the power to regulate platforms such as Kalshi and Polymarket under the Commodity Exchange Act, a US law that gives the CFTC exclusive jurisdiction over designated contract markets (DCMs). “These are financial exchanges that offer financial instruments and operate across state lines,” Selig said yesterday. “They match the bid from a resident of one state with the offer of a resident from another state and submit the trade to a clearinghouse that backstops the transactions of customers throughout the country.”

Next Stop: SCOTUS

By schwit1 • Score: 5, Informative Thread

The Third Circuit court ruled that CFTC has jurisdiction.

Southern District of New York (Judge Analisa Torres, July 2026): Denied Kalshi’s request for a preliminary injunction. Held that the CEA does not preempt New York’s gambling laws as applied to Kalshi’s sports event contracts.
District of Maryland, ditto
District of Arizona, ditto
District of Nevada, ditto
District of Utah, summary judgment allowing Utah to apply its anti-gambling laws
One Sixth Circuit decision also went against Kalshi on related issues

You need to care about the gambling

By rsilvergun • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Young men will lose billions on it. Billions they don’t have to lose. It will put them in a increasingly desperate situation when we are already putting them in a desperate situation because we have automated away the jobs they traditionally do.

Short-term crime will go up. Long term those young men will be organized into gestapos and secret police and pointed at you with guns.

Whatever else you think about ICE you need to realize that from Donald Trump’s perspective they are his personal army at his beck and call. Now that is currently not true but there is work being done to fix that…

If you don’t understand why that’s a bad situation for you to be in I’m not sure what to tell you. But what I am trying to get across is that you can’t just abandon large swaths of the population to be exploited. No matter how many guns you stockpile sooner or later you’re going to run out of bullets before the world runs out of desperate people with nothing to lose.

Re:STATE’S RIGHTS! STATE’S RIGHTS!

By SoftwareArtist • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Congress did not pass a law giving them authority over this. The Trump administration routinely claims to have powers that the law doesn’t give them, knowing most people will never look it up and will believe their false claims.

Here, I looked it up for you. This is how the law defines a “swap”, which is what the CFTC has authority over. It’s pretty dense and includes several different types of contracts, but here’s the one that’s relevant to Kalshi (emphasis added by me):

any agreement, contract, or transaction […] that provides for any purchase, sale, payment, or delivery (other than a dividend on an equity security) that is dependent on the occurrence, nonoccurrence, or the extent of the occurrence of an event or contingency associated with a potential financial, economic, or commercial consequence

The part I marked in bold is critical. That’s what distinguishes financial instruments from gambling. It must depend on something of financial, economic, or commercial consequence. If you buy an insurance policy that pays you if your house burns down, that’s a swap. Your house burning down has financial consequence to you. If you bet on who will win a football game, that’s not a swap. The football game has no financial consequence to you. It’s pure gambling.

The problem for Kalshi is that they offer both types of contracts and don’t distinguish between them, but the law does distinguish. Some of their contracts fall under the CFTC’s authority, but a lot of them are firmly outside it. Those contracts are subject to state gambling laws that they blatantly ignore.

Re:Emergency…

By tlhIngan • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Bribes and kick backs are at threat…

Which is why all the insider trading sites have hired members of the Trump family to be very high level employees. Not quite C-suite, but basically employment for doing nothing. You know, like how China has CCP members at companies to say in the government’s good graces.

Re: Emergency…

By ToasterMonkey • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

The whole reason these came about to begin with was WIPO was penalizing the US for not allowing online gambling within its borders. That’s part of a treaty obligation, so federal law is going to win here. Nothing NY does can change that, the best they can do is delay it.

You mean WTO? And we lost because *drumroll* we in fact allowed gambling online within our borders.

Nothing says we have to allow remote gambling or gambling but we did have exceptions carved out for fucking horse racing. Then we explicitly allowed those across states and online.

Mitch mutherfucking McConnell
https://www.bloodhorse.com/hor…

The treaty obligation does not change federal laws that leave gambling regulation to the states. The WTO was basically we allow it here we must allow it there. We didn’t sign a treaty to allow gambling everywhere, and the U.S. doesn’t have mandatory legalization of gambling, where ever in the fuck did you get the idea it did?