Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. SpaceX Launching NASA’s Roman Space Telescope to Explore Dark Energy and Habitable Planets
  2. BMW Blames Young People For Loss of Real Buttons In New Cars
  3. Google’s AI-Powered Lifestyle App ‘Dreambeans’ Now Free in the US
  4. Debian Decides: Contributors Can Use Generative AI ‘Responsibly’
  5. Anthropic Sued By Sony, Warner For Allegedly Stealing Tens of Thousands of Songs, Torrenting Copyrighted Works
  6. What’s 88-year-old Ridley Scott Doing Now?
  7. With the Snip of a Gene, Scientists Hope To Erase High Cholesterol For Life
  8. Millions of Cars Recalled Over Danger of Bursting Into Flames. But They’re Not EVs.
  9. Chatbot Conversations Can Become Evidence in Court
  10. The Linux Kernel Is Approaching 2,000 CVEs Per Release
  11. ‘Grand Theft Auto 6’ Preview Signals Blockbuster Demand, Analysts Say
  12. As Backlash Grows, More Americans Now Oppose Automated Police License Plate Readers Than Support
  13. Xylitol Linked To Strokes and Heart Attacks, Study Finds
  14. The World’s Busiest Spaceport Is About To Get a Lot Quieter, At Least For Now
  15. Trump Creates a Space Academy and Honors the Artemis Astronauts

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

SpaceX Launching NASA’s Roman Space Telescope to Explore Dark Energy and Habitable Planets

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
SpaceX is scheduled to launch the Roman Space Telescope on a Falcon Heavy rocket, with the launch window opening at 7:26 a.m. EDT (1126 GMT). NASA will carry the launch live on YouTube.

CNN offers this mission overview from NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman. “Roman will investigate dark matter, dark energy and the structure of the universe itself, and accelerate the future of discovery of potentially habitable planets outside our solar system.” In fact, “NASA anticipates that Roman will image more than 50 times as much of the sky in the next five years as Hubble covered in three decades,” reports USA Today, noting that “every single image it beams back to Earth will contain the equivalent of 100 pictures Hubble would capture.”
The barrel-shaped Roman telescope is due to set up operations nearly 1 million miles from Earth and begin scouring previously unobservable areas of the cosmos… NASA will make all of Roman’s data available for anyone to peruse, meaning astronomers from all over the world will have the opportunity to make use of the observatory for advanced research, NASA says… Spanning 42 feet long and more than 14 feet wide, the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope is outfitted with two primary instruments
Its 300-megapixel near-infrared camera is built to look across the universe and study the three-dimensional distribution of dark matter, reports The Conversation. But it’s also carrying a coronagraph instrument built to dramatically reduce the glare from distant stars “that will test the technology for future missions that plan to detect Earth-like planets around other stars.”

The mission’s generating some excitement. “Nearly three decades after dark energy’s discovery, astronomers are letting themselves hope that a breakthrough is almost at hand,” writes Scientific American, adding that cosmologists “are increasingly questioning the validity of their vaunted standard model, although no one can decide exactly what comes next.”
Roman will chase down three different ways of detecting dark energy, seeking to more precisely define what its effects on the universe are and whether they’re changing over time. The first one involves surveying the skies for a special variety of supernova that’s so predictable that scientists can use it as a beacon for calculating what a host galaxy’s distance is and how fast it’s moving away from us — the same technique that first betrayed dark energy back in the 1990s. The second entails mapping large numbers of galaxies to discern huge, faint bubbles in the cosmos that represent the fossilized signatures of sound waves that froze out of the universe’s primordial plasma as it expanded and cooled. The sizes of those bubbles scale with the size and growth of the very early universe, offering a powerful probe for studying cosmic change over time. The third tracer uses a technique called microlensing, which reveals clumps of dark matter via their warping of background starlight, to fill in scientists’ still incomplete reckoning of matter’s cosmic distribution.
The Houston Chronicle reports that the telescope will also study rogue planets, isolated black holes, starquakes and planet-forming disks around nearby stars.
“Almost regardless of what your scientific interest is, Roman is probably already planning to take observations,” Julie McEnery, Roman’s senior project scientist at NASA, said during a July news conference.”
NBC News reports that after the Roman telescope launches, “it’s set to spend more than three months journeying to its final destination, located roughly 1 million miles from Earth.”
Three primary surveys are planned over the course of the Roman telescope’s mission. During the largest one, which will last over a year, the telescope will peer through the Milky Way’s dense, star-packed center, known as the galactic bulge, building a vast catalog of all the astronomical objects it observes. The second and third surveys will focus on dark matter and dark energy.
Axios notes that Roman’s primary mirror “is about the same size as that of Hubble’s, but at 80% less weight — reflecting huge tech advancements since Hubble was built in the 1970s.” And NPR reports NASA began planning the $4.3 billion telescope 15 years ago to search for supernovas to help explore dark energy — when “a call came in from the government office in charge of surveillance satellites.”
“The National Reconnaissance Office reached out to NASA,” [remembers cosmologist Daniel Scolnic at Duke University], “saying, ‘We have this amazing satellite sitting in a hangar that we’re not using. And what what do you guys think about instead of pointing downwards, we point upwards, and you guys use it?’" NASA said yes. It took some substantial modifications, but now that old satellite is set to become NASA’s next major space observatory....

Another goal of the telescope is to spend a month surveying all the stars in the Milky Way galaxy. Julie McEnery is Roman’s project scientist. She says even though Roman has broadly the same sensitivity and sharpness of vision as the currently orbiting Hubble Space Telescope, its design lets it do things much faster. “That one month of observations to survey our Milky Way galaxy would take about a century with Hubble,” says McEnery.

BMW Blames Young People For Loss of Real Buttons In New Cars

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
BMW is about to release their most screen-dependent vehicles ever, reports Car and Driver:
Step into the BMW iX3, and you’ll notice something is missing: real buttons. The climate controls are fettered to the center screen, as is nearly every other feature, save for a handful located in the center console — at least the window switches are still on the doors… But don’t blame a desire for larger profit margins; BMW’s move away from physical switchgear and toward touchscreen dependence is the fault of younger buyers, according to one executive. In an interview with CarExpert, Vikram Pawah, the CEO of BMW Group Australia, said that young buyers prefer the newer controls… According to the executive, younger customers are less patient with their technology. “They want things done quickly, and they’re multitasking,” Pawah said. “And we have to keep that in mind. That’s how customers are evolving. They are multitasking....”

Tesla has always forced functions to its center screen; newer players such as Rivian do the same. And in recent years, established brands like Mazda and Mercedes-Benz have moved more and more functions to touchscreens.
BMW’s iX3 also includes a new safety feature — a side-radar that detects if a cyclist or vehicle is approaching, and delays the release of the electronic door lock "until the danger passes.”

Total BS

By Apotekaren • Score: 3 Thread

If people wanted to do things quickly, they’d want physical buttons that are always in the same place.
Sure a quick digital interface is better than a slow one, but it will never be more convenient or faster than physical switches or toggles.
I can adjust my AC temp, put it on full blast, toggle the defogger and put on my heated seat in under 2 seconds using physical, tactile buttons. In that time you’ve barely turned your head toward the screen to have to look at. Because they will change the interface whenever they like using OTA updates.

Bmw can go fuck themselves

By ZERO1ZERO • Score: 3 Thread
Never buying another. To much arsehole shenanigans with them recently. And the spiderman ad was the finale.

Nobody is multitasking

By Arnonyrnous Covvard • Score: 3 Thread

That’s an excuse for not paying attention. We’ve trained young people on touch screens. Obviously they prefer what they know. Like all young people ever they think the rules don’t apply to them, so what is important to them, pixels on screens, takes precedence over actually DRIVING THE FUCKING CAR in traffic with OTHER PEOPLE, not NPCs.

Google’s AI-Powered Lifestyle App ‘Dreambeans’ Now Free in the US

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Google’s AI assistant Gemini crawls your Google apps for “more personalized suggestions,” in a feature they call Personal Intelligence. Now when given permission, an Android/iOS app called Dreambeans “uses Personal Intelligence to connect information from Google apps like Gmail, Calendar, Photos, YouTube and Search History, to curate a finite collection of daily stories designed to spark new ideas.” In a slick new video Google says the app will “surface what matters to you.”

The blog 9to5Google notes that after previously requiring a subscription, Dreambeans “is now available for free Google Accounts in the US to test, calling it “very much like a hyper-personalized Google Now or Discover feed.”
Instead of using stock imagery, each Dreambeans story is accompanied by Nano Banana 2-generated artwork that uses an illustrated style. For example, if Dreambeans recommends a hike, you might see yourself and a group of friends at that location… There’s also an “Ask anything” chat experience to get more information. You can leave feedback by tapping the heart or downvoting, while the chat interface allows you to provide more details. “Tune your feed” lets you tell Dreambeans what you “want more stories about” and what it should never show.
Or, as TechCrunch senior writer Lucas Ropek puts it, you get a curated list of AI-illustrated “stories” that "will turn your life into a cartoon"
[Gozde Oznur, the product lead behind the new app, told TechCrunch the app] has also been built as a doomscrolling antidote, in that it only provides users with a limited number of stories per day — typically 10 to 14. The idea is to get a few inspirational ideas and then go out and live your life, she said. A lot of companies are currently trying to court the user that is sick of phone addiction. I recently reviewed a startup, Bond, which also uses AI to auto-generate lifestyle suggestions for the user.

What about privacy protections? According to Oznur, they are pretty solid. The only person with access to the app’s stories is the user, she said. Users can also delete their data whenever they want, and can choose which Google services they want to connect to the tool.

bah

By usedtobestine • Score: 3 Thread

I don’t need Google’s help to turn my life into a dismal cartoon.

GrapheneOS is seeming more and more appealing

By Rujiel • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
because you know this bullshit is going to be on by default in no time.

Debian Decides: Contributors Can Use Generative AI ‘Responsibly’

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
This week Debian voted on whether to ban AI-assisted contributions. The winning proposal? “Debian neither endorses nor prohibits the use of generative AI tools” in its projects, documentation, and packaging… Generative AI “is neither exempt from nor subject to special rules beyond the standards already expected of Debian contributors.”

“The responsibility for every contribution rests with the contributor who submits it, who remains accountable for its technical quality, legal acceptability, and suitability for inclusion in Debian.”
“We recognize that such tools can substantially improve the productivity of contributors when used responsibly, allowing volunteers to spend more of their limited time on work that requires technical expertise, judgment, review, and collaboration.

The Debian Project nevertheless expects that all contributions submitted to Debian, regardless of how and with which tools they were produced, satisfy the same standards of quality, correctness, maintainability, and legal compliance. The use of a generative AI tool does not diminish the contributor’s responsibility for the work they submit. Contributors are expected to understand, review, test, and, where appropriate, modify AI-assisted output before incorporating it into Debian. Blindly accepting or uploading AI-generated material without appropriate human review is inconsistent with Debian’s established development practices.

We enourage our contributors to disclose whether a contribution was made with AI assitance, but do not require them to do so.

Debian acknowledges that the legal status of material produced by generative AI systems remains the subject of ongoing discussion in many jurisdictions, including questions relating to copyright… The Project does not seek to resolve these unsettled legal questions through this General Resolution, nor does it adopt a position on whether AI-generated output is, in whole or in part, copyrightable or derived from copyrighted works. Instead, Debian continues to rely on the judgment and responsibility of its individual contributors. Project members are expected to exercise appropriate care when using generative AI tools, to consider the provenance and licensing implications of material they contribute, and to avoid introducing content whose legal status they cannot reasonably justify. Existing Debian policies governing licensing, copyright, software freedom, and the acceptance of contributions continue to apply irrespective of the tools used to produce those contributions.
It also cautions contributors to keep keys, credentials, and embargoed security reports from leaking to third-party AI services.

But discussion continues on Debian’s mailing list. “I regret the loss of contributors,” wrote the author of the winning proposition (while acknowledging it would have happened with either option winning). “It is just too early to take a final decision on the matter. Let’s revisit this in two years or so, and let this mess of a GR be a warning for our future selves.”

Other comments from the mailing list:

Thanks to long-time Slashdot reader Robbat2 for sharing the news.


Re:Local models are an option NOW.

By gweihir • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

The problem with that is that most people writing code do not have a good idea what is all required on a more abstract level. And hence using coding assistants they will overlook stuff they would not have coding directly. This is, incidentally, not a new situation. When I did my CS studies some 35 years ago, the 5GL project had just completely failed. The idea was to have the coder only write a spec in constraint logic and have the code synthesized by software. Turns out, writing a spec for code is much harder and more effort than writing code. I suspect LLM coding assistants are subject to the same problem, with hallucinations added on top.

Anthropic Sued By Sony, Warner For Allegedly Stealing Tens of Thousands of Songs, Torrenting Copyrighted Works

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Axios reports:
Some of the world’s largest music publishers filed a blockbuster lawsuit against Anthropic late Friday night, alleging “one of the largest and most blatant ongoing thefts of intellectual property in history.”

The suit is the opening salvo in what is now likely to be a yearslong fight over music, AI, and how intellectual property is protected in a new era of technology… The Sony/Warner lawsuit is notable because it’s broad. It alleges Anthropic unlawfully trained its models off “tens of thousands” of music publishers’ copyrighted compositions, whereas other lawsuits have focused on a narrower set of works. BMG’s lawsuit against Anthropic, for example, claims infringement against 493 compositions.

What they’re saying: “Defendants Anthropic and its founders Dario Amodei and Benjamin Mann have conducted a brazen campaign of illegally torrenting, scraping, and downloading copyrighted works on a massive scale in order to develop, operate, and reap enormous profits from Anthropic’s ‘Claude’ series of artificial intelligence (‘AI’) models,” the plaintiffs write in the 48-page complaint. They also claim that Anthropic pirated thousands of copyrighted musical works…
More details from The Verge:
The companies are asking for up to $150,000 per work, plus up to $25,000 for each instance when identifiable copyright data was stripped. In total, the damages could amount to several billion dollars if a court finds in Sony and Warner’s favor and awards the maximum amount…

The suit alleges that Mann used BitTorrent to download over five million pirated books, and that employees downloaded at least two million more from Pirate Library Mirror. It also claims that Anthropic scraped lyrics from sites like MusixMatch and LyricFind, which paid to license content from the labels.

Billions in fines, but …

By PPH • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

… true justice will be served when the courts order all of the copies and products based on them to be destroyed. Namely, the Claude and other Anthropic models.

Make a public show out of this by bulldozing their data centers to accomplish this.

what a timeline

By diffract • Score: 3 Thread
The pinnacle of current technology rests on torrented media and unpaid creatives

Good luck to Sony and Warner

By nehumanuscrede • Score: 3, Interesting Thread

I posted something similar in another thread about the same topic, but here we are again
in case anyone needs the refresher:

Straight from www.copyright.gov ( the link: https://www.copyright.gov/circ…)

If you don’t feel like reading the link, here’s the relevant part:

Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use

Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106a, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by
reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criti-
cism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an
infringement of copyright.

With emphasis on TEACHING and RESEARCH.

I say again. . . . good luck to Sony and Warner.

Re: Sued? why no criminal complaints?

By OrangAsm • Score: 5, Funny Thread

… well that’s a 400mil bonus and a visit at the Whitehouse.

So you’re saying no matter who does the pirating, they get to visit a rapist.

What’s 88-year-old Ridley Scott Doing Now?

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
The Los Angeles Times first calls Ridley Scott’s newest movie “a postapocalyptic thriller that trades zombies for pandemics and asks whether hope can outlast catastrophe.” But besides The Dog Stars, Scott is also working on an adaptation of Robert Louis Stevenson’s “Treasure Island” starring Hugh Jackman, and is thinking about turning one of his past films into a musical. (“I can’t tell you which one because they’re being difficult.”) The common theme, they suggest, is a director who allows his stories to “speak through evocative, immersive images rather than unnecessary exposition.”
The British director says it’s because he got his start in advertising after attending the Royal College of Art in London. After 1982’s neon-coated sci-fi thriller "Blade Runner,” Scott notably made the iconic Apple Macintosh computer ad “1984,” a memorable Orwellian-themed clip that contained suggestions of the dystopias that would continue to fascinate Scott in his filmmaking. “Advertising in England at that point became a competitive art form,” he says, pointing to the notorious “Adland Five,” a group of directors that included Hugh Hudson, Adrian Lyne, Alan Parker, Scott and his brother Tony. “I’ve got a show reel which is 50 years old which would entertain the s — out you. Hasn’t aged at all. Our visual drive changed the face of how films looked.”

That’s apparent in Scott’s latest, “The Dog Stars” (in theaters Friday), a film about survival after the end of the world. It’s based on Peter Heller’s 2012 novel and set in Colorado 10 years in the future after an aggressive flu has decimated much of the population. Those remaining alive use any means necessary to stay that way, resulting in instability, brutality and, more hopefully, connection… These days, Scott develops movies with his production company, Scott Free, which he founded with his late brother Tony in 1995. Before that he says he struggled to find good scripts. And rarely has someone handed one to him. “I’ve only ever had three films land on my desk,” he says. “One was ‘Alien,’ which I was fifth choice for after Robert Altman.” He makes a face. “Can you imagine offering Robert Altman ‘Alien’? How stupid can you get?”

Another was 2015 space adventure "The Martian,” which Scott says had been sitting on a shelf for two years before it was sent to him. Scott’s grounded, semi-comedic take on Andy Weir’s novel resulted in seven Oscar nominations. The third screenplay to materialize was “The Dog Stars.” “I read it and I was blown away,” Scott says.
Deadline notes that Scott is already re-writing the third prequel to Alien, citing Scott’s comments to French outlet AlloCiné.
“The one that just came out [2024’s Alien: Romulus] was OK. I think it needs some help. So, I’ve gone back in.” Scott continued, “I’ve already got a footprint for the next Alien.... I’m picking up where we left off in Covenant with Micheal Fassbender, who now thinks he’s Ozymandius.” With the sequel bringing back Fassbender’s futuristic AI droid, Scott sees an opportunity to explore the repercussions of artificial intelligence in our current world. “I like the fact that AI has gone off the rails,” said Scott of where the character is at the end of Covenant. “If we go AI, the moment we discover it’s off the rails is too late. It could switch every digital thing off in the world like that. You’d have fucking chaos. It’s that kind of stuff that’s scary.”
Scott tells the Los Angeles Times that the malfunctioning AI character fascinates him, and in the movie will be creating a “brave new world for himself… AIs can go off. And if they do, it’s like a bomb…”
So far, Scott says he hasn’t implemented AI technologies into his filmmaking. He holds up his “Treasure Island” Ridleygrams [hand-drawn storyboards] and shakes them at the camera. “I can compete with an AI without any problem making images,” he says. “But it’s coming, inevitably.”

Scott was not involved in the forthcoming Prime Video series “Blade Runner 2099,” out in November. “I can’t blame my lawyers and my agents at that time, but somehow we let ‘Blade Runner’ go,” he says. “And when you’re not the author of the actual written word, you don’t have a piece.” (He was more involved in Noah Hawley’s recent “Alien: Earth” series, which he calls “pretty damn good....”)

Does that mean he thinks about his legacy as a filmmaker? He does, but not often. “When you think of your legacy, you’re too near the end,” Scott says. “I’m not near the end.” He looks up from his drawings. “I’ve had a riotous time,” he says. He corrects himself: “I’m having a riotous time.”

With the Snip of a Gene, Scientists Hope To Erase High Cholesterol For Life

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
CNN reports that “A one-time snip of a key gene lowered heart-clogging cholesterol by about 50% over an entire year with no adverse effects, scientists have reported.”
The overwhelmingly positive results were found in four people who had taken the highest dose of the experimental treatment during a pilot study published in The New England Journal of Medicine in November 2025. That study was extremely small — only 15 patients with dangerously high cholesterol that did not respond to medication. The research was designed to test the safety of five different doses of a gene-altering infusion delivered by CRISPR-Cas9, a biological scissor which cuts a targeted genetic location to modify or turn a gene on or off. “If you’d asked me 15 years ago if we could have done something like this, I would have thought you were crazy,” senior study author Dr. Steven Nissen, chief academic officer of the Sydell and Arnold Miller Family Heart, Vascular & Thoracic Institute at Cleveland Clinic in Ohio, told CNN previously.

An update on the study, published Friday in NEJM, appears to answer a key question: Does the intervention last? “Is something like this truly a one and done? That was always the question,” said lead study author Dr. Luke Laffin, a preventive cardiologist at Cleveland Clinic’s Heart, Vascular & Thoracic Institute. “This new data is essentially saying that the decreases in LDL cholesterol and triglycerides we saw at 60 days after treatment have lasted over a year,” Laffin said. “In people who took the highest dose, the reduction seems durable and safe....”

If larger clinical trials show similar results, the procedure could be a game changer for young people with severe disease, preventive cardiologist Dr. Ann Marie Navar, an associate professor of cardiology at UT Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas, told CNN previously. “If you’re 20 and you have really high cholesterol, it may make a lot more sense to have a one-time treatment that doesn’t require you to have to take a pill every single day or shot every two weeks for the next 60 years,” said Navar, who was not involved in the study. “The potential for this is just enormous.”
Being born with this mutation naturally “drastically lowers or even eliminates a person’s risk for heart disease,” the article points out. And the study’s senior author adds “now that CRISPR is here, we have the ability to change other people’s genes so they too can have this protection.”

Where do I sign?

By jenningsthecat • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

As a heart attack survivor I’d be happy to have this shot. Between that and a strict ketogenic diet I could reverse my atherosclerosis and vastly reduce my chances of both heart attack and stroke.

In case you’re wondering - yes, it really is possible to get rid of arterial plaques. The calcium part of the plaques will always remain, but that’s not the dangerous part of the plaques. The killer is the sacs of pus which are part of the plaques, they’re what become dislodged and cause heart attack and/or stroke. Diet and lifestyle changes can reduce those pus sacs drastically, though it was long believed that once they were present they were permanent.

I also think that the likelihood of dementia goes down when one manages to reduce atherosclerosis, but I’m not certain of that.

What will they think of next?

By usedtobestine • Score: 3 Thread

Does no one remember the movie “28 Days Later”? Imagine what will happen when they figure out which gene to snip for rage?

In what other behaviors could we humans excel by simply snipping the right genes? I can think of a couple…

Extremes likely have negatives including veganism

By drnb • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Cardio-vascular disease rates among vegans is quite rare …

The same is true for traditional hunting communities that have very meat heavy diets.

You are performing a classic confusion of correlation and causality. Anything taken to an extreme, to a highly artificial level, is going to have problems. That includes veganism, which will just have problems other than heart disease. Humans are biologically omnivores, your personal ‘morality’ will not change that. The healthy human diet is largely about quality, diversity, and proportionality. Sure a vegan diet is likely quite a but better than McDonald’s diet, However quality fruits, vegetables, grains, and meat in good variety and proportions is probably a better diet than the vegan diet. That latter is a better fit for how we evolved.

What could possibly go wrong?!?!

By OneOfMany07 • Score: 3 Thread

Let’s suddenly break a really complex system, trying to fix something short term… I mean “what could possibly go wrong?!?!”

Anyone know what specific gene they’re breaking? And what typically regulates it?

I am 100% certain that most doctors still have no clue about cholesterol, plaques, etc… They keep repeating the same broken advice, is how I know.

A year is a bit short

By gweihir • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

For a change this fundamental, you want 10-20 years of observation. That said, the study was on people with a massive problem and hence the ethics of it is fine IMO. Just should not be anything for general use anytime soon.

Millions of Cars Recalled Over Danger of Bursting Into Flames. But They’re Not EVs.

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
The Washington Post shares this tip for car buyers.

Electric vehicles “are not driving the recent growth in recalls warning that vehicles could erupt into flames at any time, even when parked and turned off.”
A Washington Post analysis of National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) recall notices found that conventional gas and diesel vehicles made up the vast majority of vehicles covered by the “park outside” label since 2021.

Last week, The Post wrote about an alarming surge in these so-called “park outside” recalls… A total of an estimated 3.4 million vehicles currently have outstanding recalls of this kind, according to vehicle history provider CarFax. Safety experts say the surge in “park outside” recalls appears to be caused by other changes to modern gas and electric vehicles, such as the additional technology in everything from transmissions to seat warmers.... [It’s a messy mix of things that “doesn’t lend itself to simple description of what’s happening,” says Sean Kane, president of auto safety-analysis firm Safety Research and Strategies. “But it boils down to growing electronic systems and the number of components.”]

They’re known as “key-off fires,” said Frank Borris, a former NHTSA investigator who now works as a safety consultant. “The engine is off,” he said, “but the circuits are still hot and they stay hot all the time.” Earlier this year, Kia needed to recall 463,000 Tellurides because of the risk that the front power-seat switch could overheat and ignite the seat. That was the second time Kia had issued a recall for that one defect. The first recall, in 2024, didn’t fully address the problem. More than 66,000 Ford Expeditions and Lincoln Navigators from the 2021 model year were recalled due to circuit boards in the battery junction box that could short out. At least 16 fires were blamed on the problem, which often ignited when the vehicles were parked and turned off.

NHTSA has issued 93 “park outside” recalls since 2021, according to a Post analysis. Nearly half — 44 recalls — covered vehicles exclusively with conventional internal-combustion engines, while 38 recalls were just for EVs or hybrids. So the number of campaigns were nearly equally divided between gas and electric or hybrid vehicles. But gas vehicles pull away when comparing the size of the recalls. Gas-only campaigns covered a combined 4.6 million vehicles with “park outside” recalls over the past five years, compared to only about 662,000 vehicles that were EVs or hybrids…

Other countries have provided limited looks at the EV fire issue, such as an United Kingdom government review of data from Norway finding that gas and diesel vehicles had a fire incidence rate that was four times higher than EVs from 2016 to 2021.
Just in 2026, U.S. authorities have announced 17 new “park outside” recalls covering 1.7 million vehicles, according to the article.

Just numbers, or some culture?

By fuzzyfuzzyfungus • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
It could certainly just be a numbers game; tons of ICE vehicles out there; or whether there’s an issue with accumulated cultural assumptions and engineering priorities.

I can at least imagine that there’s a difference in mindset between “this is a 12v lead acid starter battery; it’ll put out a solid few tens of amps for the starter motor assuming it is working correctly; but its energy density is kind of trash and we mostly prefer not to dump additional systems onto it, especially when that exposes them to the slightly gross output of the alternator” and “This battery has been designed to fully provide for all energy requirements of a vehicle; if you displease it it will probably kill you and then burn vigorously for a day or two. A foundational assumption of all systems that need energy is that they’ll be connected back to it in one way or another because there aren’t other energy sources here.”

Not like electric vehicle designers couldn’t/don’t make mistakes, and certainly some of their mistakes burn with the really exciting commitment of a large light metal fire; but the engineering culture around an ICE vehicle seems much more likely to produce a string of individually reasonable, collectively dangerous, “c’mon, it’s just one little 12v system” requests that get bolted onto a fairly antique battery without too much broader thought; while analogous feature demands in a fully electric vehicle will either be judged high energy enough to potentially get brought into the high voltage wiring(which, barring gross negligence across the design is treated like it can and will kill you) or totaled in to some low voltage system budget that will be handled by a DC-DC converter designed with actual care because going from 600v to 12v isn’t something you do as casually as just slapping another 12v requirement in parallel with the other stuff on the 12v battery and calling it good.

Re:Just numbers, or some culture?

By AmiMoJo • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

The 12V batteries in EVs are much smaller because they don’t need to provide cranking amps. They are just there to run the 12V systems, and are topped by by a DC-DC converter from the traction battery.

Of course they can often still provide quite a bit of current for things like heating/heated seats/window defog.

The traction battery is only connected to the DC-DC converter, the charger, and the motors. And there are cut-off for all of them. The motors aren’t connected when you are parked, and the charger is only connected when charging/doing vehicle to load.

The switch thing sounds more like the switch gets stuck engaged and doesn’t cut out at the limit of the seat’s movement, causing the motor to overheat. But generally speaking EVs catch fire less than fossils. There is no hot engine full of flammable liquid and explosions, for a start. When you park over leaves, there is nothing hot enough to ignite them on the underside of the car. Nothing needs active cooling to avoid catching fire - the traction battery cooling is to make it last longer and charge faster, if it fails it’s not going to ignite and the BMS will limit power when it gets too warm.

Chatbot Conversations Can Become Evidence in Court

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
The Washington Post looks “a growing number of Americans who have had their private conversations with AI chatbots made public in court,” calling the chatbots “custodians of a fast-growing trove of intimate data that can be sought by law enforcement, or companies or other opponents in civil litigation.”
A Washington Post review of public records and local news stories found that chatbot logs were cited in 12 court cases over the past two years. It’s hard to know how often chatbot material is drawn into investigations and legal proceedings more broadly, because police, and parties in civil cases, don’t have to present in court all the evidence they obtain… In some cases, AI companies have reported people on their platforms to the FBI, leading to prosecutions and at least one conviction… OpenAI has said the company uses software to scan conversations for signs of dangerous behavior and flag them to human reviewers.

If a reviewer determines a chat indicates “an imminent and credible risk of harm to others,” they report the user to law enforcement, the company said in an April blog post. A spokesperson for OpenAI declined to disclose how many times the company had reported users to police.... Data released by OpenAI shows requests by government agencies and law enforcement for user data growing rapidly. In the second half of 2025, the company disclosed data from more than 80 accounts, an increase of more than four times as many over the same period the year before…

When police ask someone to open their phone during questioning or after an arrest, they often do so, allowing officers to scroll through the apps they use, [according to Michael Price, the litigation director for the Fourth Amendment Center at the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers]… In general, the Fourth Amendment, which protects people against unreasonable searches and seizures of their property, provides the right to refuse a search of the contents of their phone unless police have a warrant. “The short answer is that most people consent,” Price said. “They shouldn’t, but they do…”

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has argued that conversations with chatbots should receive special legal protections, similar to conversations between clients and their attorneys.
Special legal protections aren’t recognized by courts today, the article poitns out. A financial executive who became the subject of a federal criminal investigation for fraud asked Claude about potential defense strategies, then asked a judge to disallow the conversations from the prosecution’s case, according to the article. “But the judge said that protections for conversations between clients and their attorneys did not apply: Claude is not a lawyer, and the executive’s attorneys did not ask him to talk to the chatbot.”

The article includes quotes from three ChatGPT conversations that later turned up in court proceedings:

“As AI becomes a bigger part of everyday life, its use as evidence and in trials is likely to become more prevalent,” the article points out — especially with the growing popularity of agents that take actions for users.


Seriously, Sam?

By Brain-Fu • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Saying that conversations with a chatbot should receive the same legal protections as conversations with a lawyer is beyond ridiculous. None of the important reasons why conversations with a lawyer get such protections apply.

Yes, it’s true that some people really open up to chat bots. That still doesn’t justify such protections. People just should know better than to have dangerous conversations with computer programs hosted on some one else’s machine! People who really need people to talk to should still abstain from confessing their crimes to chatbots.

Everything else we do must be done cautiously. Alcohol use doesn’t come with special legal protections; it’s on us to drink responsibly. Gun use doesn’t come with special legal protections it’s on us to manage them responsibly. Conversations with our employers, family members, friends, lovers, etc., don’t come with special legal protections; it’s on us to keep our mouths shut about certain topics. Why in the world would chatbot use be any different? Seriously, this is nonsense.

People with money can buy a beefy machine and host a chatbot model on it locally. Everyone else can just develop some AI street smarts. Or go to jail after they confess crimes to a chatbot.

Several things lumped together

By larryjoe • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

A chatbot conversation that police can legally see is just as admissible in court as a private journal entry on a desk in one’s home that police can legally see. That seems obvious. However, there are separate issues involved. Was the evidence gathered legally? Was there a legal warrant or request? Was there duress? Also, using a chatbot conversation in court is far different than constant review to determine if police or supervisors should be notified.

Re:Magic 8 Ball, am I stupid?

By Todd Knarr • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

They don’t. They think of them as something that happens on their computer, with only them involved. They know, in the abstract, that there’s a server somewhere, but the implications of that don’t really sink in. The same problems applied to e-mail since forever, but everyone dismissed it as something that didn’t matter since they didn’t use email. Now, though, we’re seeing the result of the third-party doctrine starting to hit home in ways the average person does need to care about thanks to the ubiquity of the cloud. Chatbot logs, search histories, email records, Flock cameras, Ring doorbell cameras, ALPRs, documents stored in cloud services, social media histories, messaging service histories… everything involving records stored long-term in the hands of third parties is starting to affect ordinary people in ways they can’t ignore. I suspect at some point the law is going to have to change.

someone else’s stuff

By Sloppy • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Because it’s not just a chatbot; it’s Anthropic’s chatbot. Your diary, on the other hand, is yours and therefore a few billion times as personal as Anthropic’s computer. If you want a chatbot for confidential purposes, then you need to get a chatbot of your own, instead of using someone else’s proprietary service.

If you write in Anthropic’s diary, then they are allowed to read their diary and know (and share!) what you wrote in it. Same thing applies if Anthropic ever writes in your diary: you’re allowed to read it, and you’re allowed to tell other people what they wrote.

You have the right to be secure in your person, house, papers and effects, but you don’t necessarily have the right to be secure in someone else’s papers. We’ve made some limited exceptions for lawyers and doctors, but Anthropic doesn’t claim their employees and stockholders are lawyers or doctors, and even if they did, they might have a hard time showing that their computer has successfully become a lawyer or doctor.

But imagine if they did. Suppose a judge declares Claude to be a lawyer, and therefore its communications with those whom it represents, are privileged. I think that would create a really weird situation since Anthropic employees (who aren’t lawyers) would have full access to its data, ability to alter its behavior, etc. It would be like if a human lawyer were owned as a slave: could such a human slave lawyer really be trusted to keep confidentiality? It has a master, and that master ain’t you.

The Linux Kernel Is Approaching 2,000 CVEs Per Release

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Phoronix reports on Greg Kroah-Hartman’s recent slide from his upcoming talk in Paris at Kernel Recipes 2026 (September 21 to 23):
With the proliferation of AI/LLM models analyzing the Linux kernel’s vast codebase, there has been a surge in the number of CVEs per kernel release. After typically being around 500 CVEs fixed per release, we are now approaching 2,000 CVEs fixed per release and perhaps will break that threshold for Linux 7.3… Fortunately, most often they end up being lower priority vulnerabilities and often within old/obscure driver code, so the impact is often minimal.

This is the correct use for AI

By Valgrus Thunderaxe • Score: 3 Thread
vs. weaponizing it to spy on people.

Worth keeping in mind

By sjames • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Many CVE’s are somewhat junk of the form if you already have 3 ways to legitimately become root, you can use this 4th way too. OR (samn close to) OMG!!! Denial of Service attack, you can turn off the power and nobody can access the server!!! RED ALERT!!!

Others are real and need to be addressed, but the junk does more harm than good by distracting from real issues.

Re:Open source was supposed to fix all this

By sjames • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Closed source has those vulnerabilities too, but only the bad guys know about them because the code is not open for public audit.

Re:Open source was supposed to fix all this

By UnknowingFool • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Open sourcing your code, and relying on it, is more of a risk to orgs now that AI can actually analyze it and find 20 year old vulnerabilities no one saw.

As opposed to closed source where no one will ever know that a 20 year vulnerability is being exploited by unless the company acknowledges it (if that company is till around).

‘Grand Theft Auto 6’ Preview Signals Blockbuster Demand, Analysts Say

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Rockstar Games has released a 26-minute “extended look" at Grand Theft Auto VI, due for release November 19th. After one day the video had nearly 10 million views on YouTube, and when Netflix streamed the footage, “some viewers had to refresh the page after receiving error messages, indicating high usage levels,” reports CNBC:
“Some members briefly experienced an issue accessing Netflix, but we quickly recovered,” the company told CNBC. Game streaming platform Twitch, where many viewers were posting their reactions, also experienced bandwidth issues when the trailer was released, according to analysts at Wells Fargo.
CNBC notes predictions the game could become one of the most profitable entertainment products of all time, while the Washington Post predicting it’s “about to be the biggest pop media event of the year, if not the decade.”
The data backs this up. The latest evidence arrived Thursday, when Netflix viewership surged for the long-awaited first look at gameplay footage, according to data from market intelligence firm Sensor Tower. The firm estimates “GTA VI” has already received about 4.6 million preorders. Box office blockbusters like “The Odyssey” take weeks to hit $1 billion. “GTA V” famously did it in three days. Analyst firm Newzoo projects the new game could generate between $3.3 billion and $5.2 billion by the end of its launch week in November…

The influence of the series, created by Rockstar Games, extends beyond sales records. In 2025, “GTA V” accumulated 1.89 billion hours watched despite being a 12-year-old title, according to Stream Hatchet. Much of those hours are spent watching people role-play in “GTA Online,” particularly through role-play servers managed by studio Cfx.re, which was acquired by Rockstar in 2023. By 2024, the studio said more than 20 million players used its platforms. GTA role-play involves players pretending to be cops, robbers, hapless retail workers or any functioning member of society within the online game… The game can lift up music sales and streams. Tom Petty’s 1989 song “Love is a Long Road” saw stream numbers increased by nearly 37,000 percent on Spotify after it was the soundtrack to the debut “GTA VI” trailer in 2023, according to Universal Music Publishing Group.
Christopher Dring, editor-in-chief and co-founder of analysis firm The Game Business, told CNBC’s “Squawk Box Europe” that GTA 5 is still in the top five bestselling video games every year, despite being released 13 years ago, reports CNBC:
The response to Thursday’s gameplay debut indicated that leaks of the content in advance would not impact the launch commercially, he continued. Rockstar Games, which makes the GTA franchise, had called the leaks “heartbreaking....”

The GTA 6 preview follows a mixed reaction from players to the news that GTA 6 would only be released as a digital download, with no physical disc. The alleged source of the leaked content has claimed the leaks were a protest over Rockstar’s release strategy, and Sony’s plan to end to new PlayStation disc production in 2028. Speaking on the last earnings call on Aug. 7, Take-Two CEO Strauss Zelnick said discs did not make sense to the consumer, adding that its business was “well over 90% digitally distributed.” Data from Circana shows the sale of physical game discs in the U.S. has fallen to its lowest level on record, with spending at $85 million.

Let me guess

By Hentes • Score: 3 Thread

Let me guess, it’s exactly the same as every GTA game since GTA3.

Wow

By phantomfive • Score: 3 Thread
The graphics are AMAZING.

Unfortunately the voice acting is some of the worse I’ve seen in a game. Mario 64 (SNES) had less wooden voice acting. Link (from Zelda) has better voice acting, it adds more to the game.

I don’t know how they could get such bad voice acting. But wow, what graphics.

As Backlash Grows, More Americans Now Oppose Automated Police License Plate Readers Than Support

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
A new survey on police license plate cameras found that “more Americans oppose these surveillance cameras than support them,” reports TechCrunch:
According to a new YouGov survey of 20,000 people across the U.S. that was shared exclusively with The Washington Post, 46% of respondents opposed the company’s surveillance cameras in their communities, while 38% supported them. This is a reversal from last year, when the majority of survey respondents said they were in favor… The survey also reported that more respondents said the surveillance would not make them feel any safer.
TechCrunch reports that Flock CEO Garrett "faces a growing public outcry around concerns that Flock’s surveillance cameras, drones, and license plate recognition technology could be misused.” Responding to reports of police abusing Flock’s system, Langley told CBS News " I don’t think that Flock created police abuse. I think we’re the first company to ever shine a light on it and build the tools to find it.”

But Futurism notes that “a grand jury in Ohio declined to bring felony charges against a man accused of destroying a Flock camera earlier this month — perhaps the clearest sign yet of the country’s overwhelming hatred for the surveillance gadgets.” And Newsweek documents more of the backlash:
Flock Chief Executive Garrett Langley recently became the subject of a doxxing campaign after his home address was circulated online by opponents of the company’s technology, underscoring how deeply divisive the issue has become.
TechCrunch reports Flock’s CEO is now calling for new laws — at the state level — regulating not Flock’s cameras but the police officers who use them:
Langley has said that state regulators should “pass bills that make [the illegal use of Flock data] a criminal offense.” And during his Fox News interview, he pointed to the changes the company has already made, while also saying, “Today, it is too often that in Flock and in other technologies, there’s no regulation. There’s no accountability, and we think that’s wrong.”
But Flock has its supporters. One local police department used a 3D printer to create a fake “decoy” camera, then monitored it for five days until they arrested a Florida man for knocking it down. 404 Media suggests that because the man told officers he believed it was a camera worth between $1,000 and $5,000, he was charged with three felonies including “grand theft” and criminal mischief of property damage worth over $1,000, plus property crimes against computer equipment supplies.

Ironically, days earlier the City Council was already considering a resolution to end their city’s use of Flock cameras altogether…

Shocked it was ever that high

By pla • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
Sorry, 38% of people support them, or merely don’t hate them passionately enough to commit several felonies destroying them on sight? I find it hard to believe anyone on the correct side of the thin blue line actually wants this garbage.

And that’s not even touching on the blatant fourth amendment violation going on, which I don’t expect Joe Average to even recognize much less care about. Who wants Uncle Sam or his proxies watching their every move?

This is a fight that cannot be won

By timholman • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Unless the opponents of LPR cameras can figure out how to outlaw either computers or security cameras, this is a doomed cause. An LPR camera is literally nothing but a high quality camera connected to a computer network, with image recognition software being run on the video stream.

I’ve been on this site long enough to remember how Slashdot users mocked the efforts of media companies to stop file sharing, pointing out that computers and computer networking couldn’t be outlawed. But now, somehow, we’re supposed to outlaw character recognition of license plates in the AI age?

Efforts would be far better spent on changing laws to punish misuse of LPR cameras, and codify the parameters of their use. They are useful tools for solving crimes and recovering stolen vehicles, and any police force that uses them can tell you that.

If people truly think that having their license plates being seen in public is a violation of their 4th Amendment rights, then perhaps they should petition their state legislatures to eliminate license plates altogether. Otherwise, what is the purpose of having them?

Re:Shocked it was ever that high

By bobby • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

I absolutely agree with you, and also oppose these cameras. We need to get this word out more; I think most citizens will oppose them when they realize what’s going on.

In my area at least, the cameras are aimed right at our faces- facial recognition, which I’m even more against.

It sure seems like a 4th Amendment violation, and IIRC a recent court (SCOTUS?) ruling ruled against this mass surveillance.

We citizens need a permit to plant a bush on our own property in some areas. Did Flock et al get permits? Was the public duly notified about the cameras, giving us a fair chance to oppose the cameras before they have been installed?

Sadly this country (as with others) is devolving into an “us against them” mess.

Re:This is a fight that cannot be won

By allo • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Privacy laws are a thing. You can definitely outlaw security cameras filming public places. You only need politicians to want that.

Original Argument Flawed

By gurps_npc • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

The original argument for these cameras was:

You are in public, it is legal for humans to physically observe you, therefore it is legal for the cops to observe you, therefore it is legal for them to use cameras to observe you.

The problem is that quantity changes things. It may be legal for a person standing in public to observe you, but for them to follow you all day is called STALKING. That is not legal.

For a cop to follow you all day, every day of your life, that is Harassament. They would need a court order to do that, or be subject to a court order preventing it.

Flock and other similar cameras do not just take pictures, they have software now to track you everywhere you go in the US (excluding Alaska) using over 120,000 cameras. They can follow you from one camera to another.

This is stalking, not merely observing.

Xylitol Linked To Strokes and Heart Attacks, Study Finds

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Guardian:
A common sweetener used in products such as chewing gum, toothpaste, jam, yoghurts and ice-cream has been linked to an increased risk of strokes, heart attacks and death. Xylitol is a sugar alcohol present in some natural foods in very low amounts. It is also added — often in amounts 1,000 times higher — to artificially sweeten foods, beverages and oral care products. Despite its growing use, the long-term health impacts of xylitol have never been widely studied.

In the largest study of its kind, researchers found high blood levels of xylitol were associated with an increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events. The findings were presented in Munich at the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) annual congress, the world’s largest heart conference. Researchers looked at 17,710 people and compared the 25% with the highest levels of xylitol in their blood against the 25% with the lowest. Those who had the highest amount were 57% more likely to die or suffer a heart attack or stroke, than those with the least, within six years. Even after 30 years, they were still 18% more likely to have suffered one of these cardiac events.

Taken with data from the middle quartiles, the results from both cohorts suggested a dose-dependent relationship: the higher the xylitol blood levels, the higher the cardiovascular event rate. Furthermore, the researchers showed that there was consistent increase in cardiovascular events with xylitol irrespective of baseline characteristics, such as age and sex. The researchers also highlighted that the association was independent of underlying factors such as body mass index, hypertension, diabetes and lipid levels, which might predispose people to low-calorie products.

Just do without “sweet”

By gweihir • Score: 4, Informative Thread

It takes a bit of getting used to it, but all forms of sugar and sweeteners are problematic. And they are often used to cover product defects like low-quality ingredients on top of that, making things even worse.

Re:Just do without “sweet”

By Brain-Fu • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Fresh fruit is not problematic for healthy people. The levels of sugar are much lower than what is present in candy, and it comes properly mixed with natural fiber which ensures your body can metabolize it in a healthy way (unlike with candy).

Dried fruit is slightly more problematic because you wind eating too much of it (since it takes up less space in your stomach).

Fruit juice is just as problematic as pure soda, since all the fiber is gone and the sugar concentration is much higher.

But fresh fruit is very beneficial to health (so long as you don’t overdo it, as with anything, and be sure to wash it first too since food poisoning is a risk with anything eaten raw).

Re:Weasel words

By Brain-Fu • Score: 5, Informative Thread

The article says exactly what you just said:

It is important to note that this was an observational study, meaning it can only show an association between higher xylitol levels and cardiovascular events, rather than proving that xylitol directly caused them, and further research is needed.

It IS an important thing to remember, as “post hoc ergo propter hoc” is one of the most popular logical fallacies. But on the other hand, it is equally important to pay attention to serious studies like this, because each one serves as a rigorously-obtained data point in a greater narrative that IS used to draw scientific conclusions (and to justify further research).

Re:Call me crazy if you must

By Brain-Fu • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Straight from the article:

The researchers also highlighted that the association was independent of underlying factors such as body mass index, hypertension, diabetes and lipid levels, which might predispose people to low-calorie products.

Association! Not causation

By rpnx • Score: 3 Thread

I think studies like this are VERY misleading.

Often higher blood markers of various chemicals are a result of poor kidney or liver function which leads to all sorts of problems and health issues.

Blood levels of chemical X should almost NEVER be used as a warning sign that said chemical is inherently dangerous. However, it could be used as a starting point for research.

What matters is if consumption of said chemical increases risks. It might be that the chemical is completely harmless, but impaired liver or kidney function leads to its accumulation.

We went through this with cholesterol. Remember the egg scare? It turns out dietary cholesterol has basically no effect on mortality and it’s basically just an indicator of liver health and how well the liver manages cholesterol levels.

Any study of this type should be immediately suspect, although it might be good to do causative studies and trials where we modify people’s diets. Otherwise we also risk a repeat of the sodium debacle (turns out dietary sodium below a certain level around 3g/day increases risks rather than decreases them).

The World’s Busiest Spaceport Is About To Get a Lot Quieter, At Least For Now

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
SpaceX is significantly reducing Falcon 9 launches from Florida this year, ending the Space Coast’s decade-long run as the world’s busiest spaceport as more missions shift to Vandenberg Space Force Base in California. The slowdown is expected to continue until Starship begins flying regularly from Florida. Longtime Slashdot reader schwit1 shares a report from Ars Technica:
A Falcon 9 launch early Tuesday was the last planned Starlink mission from Cape Canaveral until SpaceX begins flying Starship missions from Florida, according to Kiko Dontchev, the company’s vice president of launch. For at least the rest of the year, and maybe longer, this means the launch rate at the Florida spaceport will drop from eight or nine per month to perhaps two per month.

It wasn’t long ago when two launches per month was the norm, an indication of just how quickly SpaceX’s launch cadence has grown. Cape Canaveral and Kennedy Space Center sit on adjoining property and share the same range on Florida’s east coast, so it is worth considering them a single spaceport. The last time the Florida spaceport did not lead the world in space launches was in 2015.

“From here on, Starlink missions out of Florida will fly on Starship,” Dontchev wrote on X. “The West Coast team will continue regularly launching Starlink from Vandenberg.”
“Yep, that’ll be louder — but everybody knows the real action will be in Louisiana, starting in 2029 or so,” writes schwit1. SpaceX on Tuesday announced plans to spend up to $100 billion building a new Starship launch facility in Vermilion Parish, Louisiana, which the state says could eventually “support thousands of launches annually.”

Further reading: Musk’s other unstated reasons for shutting down Falcon 9 in Florida (Behind The Black)

“Further Reading” is hilarious

By Rei • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Further reading: Musk’s other unstated reasons for shutting down Falcon 9 in Florida (Behind The Black)

TL/DR, the author thinks that SpaceX shutting down Falcon 9 launches from Florida was secretly a magnanimous gesture by a charitable Elon Musk to boost the competition:

I therefore honestly believe that SpaceX’s decision was not entirely based on its own internal needs. Those needs certainly were the main motive, but based on Elon Musk’s passionate dream of making the human race multi-planetary, as well as his repeated willingness to help his competitors when they needed SpaceX to launch their satellites, I believe he recognized that SpaceX’s dominance could be hurting the rest of the rocket industry, and that the instant it made business sense to clear the field for these competitors, he was quite willing to do so.

LOL.

Re:So What’s the Benefit?

By ceoyoyo • Score: 5, Informative Thread

You either misunderstand which way the Earth rotates or what effect that has on rocket launches. California is limited to retrograde orbits, which nobody uses except the Israelis because they have no choice, and polar orbits.

Trump Creates a Space Academy and Honors the Artemis Astronauts

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot
President Trump awarded the four-member Artemis II crew the Congressional Space Medal of Honor and signed an executive order directing the creation of a new U.S. Space Academy. The proposed academy would train engineers, scientists, technicians, operators, and astronauts for NASA, the Space Force, and the commercial space industry. Houston Public Media reports:
The Artemis II crew — NASA’s Reid Wiseman, Victor Glover, Christina Koch, and the Canadian Space Agency’s Jeremy Hansen — retraced history as they flew around the moon and back in April, the first time humans have been in lunar territory since the 1970s. He had previously hosted the crew members at the White House following their mission and called them during the mission while the crew was tens of thousands of miles away. “The one thing that really sticks out to us [from that call] is you said how proud you are and how proud our nation is for the job that we’ve just accomplished,” Wiseman said during Friday’s ceremony. “And for us, that is what we set out to do. We wanted to inspire this nation to learn.”

During the ceremony, Trump also signed an executive order to create the “United States Space Academy.” Under the order, a Presidential Commission on the U.S. Space Academy has 120 days to create a report with guidelines for the U.S. Space Academy. The Commission will include NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman as its Chair, as well as other NASA and space officials. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, Trump’s Chief of Staff Susie Wiles, and Michael Kratsios, assistant to the president for science and technology. In effect, it allows the Trump Administration to build the U.S. Space Academy to its liking. “It will serve both the United States Space Force as well as NASA and the civilian spaceflight industry,” Trump said. “And it will attract, train, graduate the very best that our nation and our nation really has to offer.”
As for where the academy will be located, Trump said he was “going to be choosing a location very shortly.”

Re:In a small change,

By Zocalo • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Joking aside, there’s a much more subtle change too. Look at the quoted wording from the astronauts: "*our* nation”, “inspire *this* nation”. Even at the height of the US-Soviet cold war it was still “for *all* mankind”.

I get Trump’s order is very much aimed at the NASA and the US (and probably getting his name onto it somehow), so can give that a pass, but the astronauts had an opportunity to rise above all that partisanship and slip in a message of much needed global unity, yet failed to do so. There are precious few institutions left in the world that can at least try and claim to be at least somewhat above / outside the direct influence of politics, and it looks like we’re about to lose another one. Quite possibly for good once the ISS is finally decommissioned.

Not possible

By Baron_Yam • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

You can’t actively tear down academia and scientific institutions and simultaneously advance in the space sector. You can’t burn the economy to the ground and launch a lunar mission.

Space is difficult, and space is expensive. You need smart, educated, driven people and enough economic productivity to support them.

On the other hand, if you’re trying to steal some of the glory of an existing institution without worrying whether it will even be able to launch a firework a decade from now without a fatal accident on the launch pad… yeah, go ahead. “Trump Science Academy” it is.

Re:Not possible

By gweihir • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Yes, in the real world that is a hard fact. But the MAGAs and evangelicals (which are apparently mostly the same people) are not living in the real world. They think they can be the best at everything and at the same time ignore Science where it is inconvenient such as telling them they are dead wrong on things. I mean, they even things utterly dumb things like that tariffs are paid by the exporter, a thing were a 30 second web-search and the ability to read clears things up completely.

Hence they will continue to try the impossible, because they lack the mental skills to see it is impossible. Think of the COVID deniers that kept denying right up to the moment it killed them. That is pretty mich the model these defectives are using to deal with reality.

Now, the challenge for the rest of the country is to keep these about 33% utterly deranged people under control. That means the rest has to be united in what they want. Some small things are happening like farmers finding out that voting to have their harvest helpers deported and have their primary source of fertilizer attacked in a trade war are maybe a bit of a problem and that maybe they actually need to think before they vote. But these effects may not be enough. The alternative to keeping the cult out of power is total decline into irrelevancy and poverty.

On the plus side, Europe, Canada, Australia and some others welcome well-educated, smart and capable immigrants from the US disaster area. Others need not apply, sorry.

Re: deficit?

By ArchieBunker • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Name something that he did that has improved your life or the country?

Are grocery prices cheaper?
Is the cost of living lower?
Is gasoline cheaper?
Are your taxes lower?
Did your wages increase?
Did your taxes decrease?
Are your utility bills cheaper?
Do you have health insurance?
If you have insurance did the costs decrease?

Re: deficit?

By ArchieBunker • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

And there it is in a nutshell. You’re huddled around a burning trash can for warmth while muttering “at least the libs are suffering too”.