Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. China’s EV Price War Was Built On Cars Sold At a Loss
  2. Tesco Moving 40,000 Server Workloads Off VMware Amid Broadcom’s ‘Abusive Conduct’
  3. Microsoft Working To Patch ‘RoguePlanet’ Zero-Day
  4. Smartphone Market To Shrink 15% This Year Due To Memory Crisis
  5. Carvana Is Turning Dealerships Into ‘Playgrounds,’ Test-Drive Centers With Sales All Online
  6. Google, Microsoft, and OpenAI Back Linux Foundation’s Appia AI Standards Initiative
  7. Anthropic Employees Accuse Trump Administration of Targeting Them
  8. AI Will Lead To Labor Shortages, Bezos Says In Optimistic Talk
  9. Epic Games Announces Lore Open-Source Version Control System
  10. Hacking Group Claims Major Hack of Novo Nordisk, Attempted $25 Million Extortion
  11. OpenAI Losses Increased Nearly 8X In 2025, With Spending Hitting $34 Billion
  12. Stop Killing Games Fails To Secure EU Law Despite 1.3 Million Signatures
  13. AI and Brain-Computer Interface Allow Speechless ALS Patient To Work a Full-Time Job
  14. HPE Tempts VMware Users, Partners With Year of Free Virtualization Software
  15. Commodore’s Callback 8020 Is a $499 Flip Phone That Blocks Social Media and Browsers

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

China’s EV Price War Was Built On Cars Sold At a Loss

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Longtime Slashdot reader schwit1 shares a report from Autoblog:
For years, the Chinese auto industry has employed a hostile price war to kneecap global competitors. Armed with massive state subsidies, cheap raw materials, and an aggressive “scale-first” business model, Chinese automakers flooded the market with electric vehicles priced so low that legacy manufacturers stood no chance to compete. How did they do it? Simple, they couldn’t. They did it anyway. Reports from CarNewsChina show that Chinese automakers have been selling vehicles at a loss until a recent law passed by the Chinese government banned below-cost sales of new vehicles. During the ongoing sales slump in China caused by rolled-back subsidies and direct government intervention banning below-cost sales, the truth behind the rapid expansion of the Chinese auto industry has been exposed.
“By the first quarter of 2026, China captured 32 percent of the global auto market, with its New Energy Vehicles (NEVs) controlling an incredible 61 percent of global share,” the report notes. Yet that dominance has come at a steep cost: throughout 2025, “the profit margin for China’s auto industry plunged to 4.4 percent and dropped further to a historic low of 3.2 percent in early 2026.”
“Gross profit, not net profit, per vehicle, plummeted to a mere $2,000. We can expect the net figure to be loss-making.” Autoblog adds: “Data shows over 70 percent of Chinese car sales were loss-making. This left more than half of the country’s auto industry in the red. Great Wall Motor (GWM) even saw net profits drop 17 percent despite steady revenue growth.”

China’s EV price war has now hit a wall. New regulations are discouraging below-cost sales, rising material costs are forcing automakers to cut discounts and raise prices, and reduced tax incentives are weakening domestic demand. To sustain growth, manufacturers are increasingly turning to exports.

Sojust like every other tech growth story

By shilly • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Amazon took nine years to reach profitability. OpenAI posted an operating loss of 20bn. And most pertinently, Tesla took 17 years to reach profitablity. They all got significant state support to the tune of many billions, as well, as have all of the big three US car OEMs over the decades.

Treating this as some kind of gotcha is just idiotic double standards.

The difference between the Chinese and US automakers is what they did with the state support and the time afforded to them by being able to operate at a loss. The Chinese automakers used it to build innovation systems capable of launching new models in 18 months vs the 5 to 7 years it takes the US OEMs. The US OEMs, bar Tesla, used it to finance BAU, and more fool them, and they’re paying the price now. Tesla used it to do some weird mix of innovation and making Musk grotesquely rich.

Re:Sojust like every other tech growth story

By locater16 • Score: 4, Informative Thread
The “innovation” of China “being able to launch new models in 18 months” is f*ing embarrassing. Not for them, but for all the stupid, blindingly obvious shit other auto manufacturers just weren’t doing at all like “model it in a f*ing computer before going to all the trouble of building a prototype you tenth wits”.

Re:You cannot trust China to tell you the truth

By dfghjk • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Source: Donald Trump

Good thing we have Elon Musk though.

And Open AI ?

By greytree • Score: 3 Thread
OpenAI is running ChatGPT at a loss.

That’s how the world works.

Re:And it gets worse!

By jhoegl • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
So what? This is literally capitalism and because it comes from China, everyone is all baby about it?
Is this a problem? yes… but its also capitalism. you cant wave away “capitalism” when it benefits you, but not others and then be upset when others are benefiting and you are not.
This is more a problem for the companies to fix, but they wont, because US taxpayers will pay for the bail out, yet again while the correction of “capitalism” never happens due to it.
We are backwards on a lot of our policies and governance here, and the point of capitalism is looking a lot more like communism and Oligarch rule.

Tesco Moving 40,000 Server Workloads Off VMware Amid Broadcom’s ‘Abusive Conduct’

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica:
Tesco, a retail conglomerate headquartered in the United Kingdom, is moving 40,000 server workloads off of VMware amid “abusive conduct” from Broadcom, recent legal filings claim. Tesco filed a lawsuit in the UK’s High Court against Broadcom alleging breach of contract last year. According to a September report from The Register, the lawsuit claimed that in January 2021, Tesco bought perpetual licenses for VMware’s vSphere Foundation and Cloud Foundation, a subscription to VMware Tanzu, plus support services until 2026, with the option to extend support for four additional years.

But when Broadcom took over VMware in November 2023, it would not honor the deal and instead tried to get Tesco to pay “excessive and inflated prices for virtualization software for which Tesco has already paid” and would not allow it to buy support services for its perpetually licensed software without buying “duplicative subscription-based licenses for those same Software products,” the initial complaint read, The Register reported at the time. Tesco, which reported 73.7 billion pounds (about $98.7 billion) in revenue in its fiscal year 2026, has since started migrating away from VMware and Broadcom’s mainframe products, according to late-May court filings reported on by The Register today.

In January, Broadcom stopped supporting Tesco’s VMware products, Tesco said, and Tesco has been paying for third-party support since. In its initial filing, Tesco also said that Broadcom refused to upgrade software or provide all security updates to customers without subscriptions. One of Tesco’s recent filings, per The Register, reads: “Faced with Broadcom’s abusive conduct, and given the criticality of virtualization and mainframe software and services to its business, Tesco has been forced to incur material costs to procure alternative solutions with reduced functionality, and to migrate to that software in a manner, and on a timeframe, that creates very significant risks to its business.”

If it works “at exceptional pace,” Tesco will be completely off VMware by the end of 2027 at the earliest. However, “the timeframe in which that migration must be undertaken has created and continues to create operational and commercial risk, and at material ongoing cost and disruption to the business,” Tesco reportedly noted. Tesco is also dealing with migration challenges related to data security because its new, unnamed virtualization software is incompatible with the Veeam and Zerto products it uses. Tesco initially requested at least 100 million pounds (about $133.6 million) in damages each from Broadcom, VMware, and reseller Computacenter, plus interest. In its recent filings, Tesco said it turned down at least four offers from Broadcom to continue using VMware and Broadcom’s mainframe tech. […] The case is expected to go to court between November 1, 2027, and February 25, 2028, The Register reported. Afterward, it could go to trial.
Further reading: HPE Tempts VMware Users, Partners With Year of Free Virtualization Software

Precedent?

By Luckyo • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Going to be an interesting case to follow, as it will likely set at least some precedents in UK in terms of how much you can squeeze other businesses in B2B contracts in “terms of service”, as well as how much you can retroactively change terms on “perpetual licenses”.

Re:Precedent?

By Jayhawk0123 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

should be interesting like you said… Europe isn’t as quick to F over the people in exchange for corporate BS.

I hope Broadcom gets destroyed. The precedent upholding this bs is you can sell services/goods with licenses, then have another company buy you, keep all the profits from that and not honor the contracts. One can do this perpetually and grift customers and completely undermine all contracts. How this is even thought to be okay is insane, no sane logical person would look at this and think this is how contracts work and what perpetual means. Buying a company- there is due diligence done BECASUE you buy the company whole and it’s LIABILITIES… even if those are contracts you don’t like. Normally, they’d need to buy out the contract or re-negotiate first. In some jurisdictions- contract changes are a 2 party system where both need to agree on changes to the terms no matter the TOS.

Justice delayed is justice denied

By innocent_white_lamb • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

“The case is expected to go to court between November 1, 2027, and February 25, 2028, The Register reported. Afterward, it could go to trial.”

So two years later, after Tesco has completed all of the emergency work that’s required to change their IT systems to something else, then this matter will be heard.

That timeframe is ridiculous. There’s no reason why the courts can’t operate more efficiently than they do other than that the lawyers and judges have no incentive to move things along.

How many other cases are old news and no longer particularly relevant by the time they’re decided?

Re:Precedent?

By ItsJustAPseudonym • Score: 5, Informative Thread
“The precedent upholding this bs is you can sell services/goods with licenses, then have another company buy you, keep all the profits from that and not honor the contracts. One can do this perpetually and grift customers and completely undermine all contracts.”

Someting like this has happened in the U.S. with unscrupulous solar panel + loan companies. You sign a contract to get the company to install solar panels on your house, and you pay for it with a lien. Usually the company has to maintain the installation. But there have been cases where the original company goes bankrupt, and another company buys all of the loans. The new company demands the client to continue to pay them monthly, but refuses to maintain the system any more, claiming they bought the loans, not the service agreements.

Did not (and won’t) happen to me, but it’s been in the news in the U.S.

Re:Justice delayed is justice denied

By cardpuncher • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Both sides are going to want to get a great deal more evidence to support their positions - Tesco might want access to e-mails and strategy documents from Broadcom and they might want internal documents from Tesco showing what actual difficulties they encountered in migrating away. These will then have to be digested by experts capable of presenting them to the court and a case/defence built around them. All that takes a great deal of time. The aim of a civil case is to get financial restitution for the damages allegedly caused and the full amount probably won’t even be known until the migration process is complete. Filing the case allows the discovery process to begin.

Courts will only intervene urgently if there’s a threat of harm that could not subsequently be compensated adequately by monetary damages. In this case, all parties are large corporations with deep pockets whose continued trading is not in question.

Microsoft Working To Patch ‘RoguePlanet’ Zero-Day

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
wiredmikey shares a report from SecurityWeek:
Microsoft on Wednesday published an advisory acknowledging the public disclosure of a vulnerability in Defender that could lead to privilege escalation. The security defect, tracked as CVE-2026-50656 (CVSS score of 7.8), was dropped last week by security researcher Nightmare Eclipse (also known as Chaotic Eclipse). “We are working to provide a high-quality security update that addresses this vulnerability. We will provide information in this CVE when the update is available,” Microsoft adds.

RoguePlanet, Nightmare Eclipse explained last week, targets a race condition in Microsoft Defender and allows attackers to gain System privileges. The researcher released a proof-of-concept (PoC) exploit that demonstrates local privilege escalation (LPE) on Windows 11 and Windows 10 systems with the June 2026 patches installed. […] On Wednesday, Nightmare Eclipse pointed out that the PoC works regardless of whether Defender’s real-time protection is enabled or disabled. It may even work in passive mode, the researcher said.

In Other Words

By jrnvk • Score: 3 Thread

“the PoC works regardless of whether Defender’s real-time protection is enabled or disabled. It may even work in passive mode”… so in other words, the application that was supposed to protect organizations actually became the attack vector. Awesome!

Smartphone Market To Shrink 15% This Year Due To Memory Crisis

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
CCS Insight expects global smartphone shipments to fall 15% this year as AI-driven demand pushes memory manufacturers toward higher-margin server chips. "[S]ome entry-level devices have already seen their sticker prices go up by more than 50 percent since last year,” reports The Register. From the report:
The firm found that the primary smartphone market (meaning new devices) contracted 4.4 percent in the first quarter of this year, despite sales channels front-loading (meaning stockpiling) product inventory, as device prices begin to rise sharply. As CCS notes, this casts an ominous shadow on the outlook for the rest of the year, and it seems things have worsened since The Register first started reporting on the smartphone memory woes.

Back in January, the forecast was for handset price rises of 6-8 percent, while the most pessimistic outlook was that the global market might contract as much as 5.2 percent. By February, analysts were expecting to see a decline in shipments of around 8 percent across the global market, and for prices to increase by about 14 percent.

The root cause of all this is the AI craze, which has seen huge demand for high-performance GPU-filled servers to process it all. Chipmakers have moved to capitalize on this by prioritizing production of high-margin memory components for those servers, rather than making the plain old DRAM and NAND needed for PCs and phones.
“The memory chip crisis shows no sign of slowing down in the near future, ramping up the pressure on manufacturers and consumers. Memory components now account for more than 30 percent of a manufacturer’s bill of materials in some smartphones.” said CCS research analyst Ben Hatton. “The full impact has yet to be felt in many regions, but it’s clear that device prices will accelerate over the rest of the year.”

I just had to replace a phone for a family member

By rsilvergun • Score: 3 Thread
And I bought more or less the same phone I bought last year but it was $200 more. So yeah. Nobody is going to be looking to upgrade they’re going to hang on to what they’ve got unless it breaks.

Under normal circumstances there’s at least a dozen companies that would be manufacturing ram right now but with antitrust law enforcement Up in smoke nobody is going to take the risk because if they try one of the big ram producers will just temporarily lower their prices and run them out of business.

Elections have consequences and one of them is you don’t get cool electronics anymore.

Re:I just had to replace a phone for a family memb

By Powercntrl • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Elections have consequences and one of them is you don’t get cool electronics anymore.

I know for you politics is like the square hole that everything fits into, but the RAM shortage is just capitalism being capitalism (and you probably know the famous saying that it’s the worst system except for everything else we’ve tried). It’s been explained to death - the RAM manufacturers are worried that if they build more capacity, the AI bubble could pop and then they’d be left holding the bag.

I’m not even sure how you’d fix this situation. Some types of businesses are just extremely expensive to start, which is also why there aren’t like 50 different competitors to Disney World.

And people are keeping them longer?

By p51d007 • Score: 3, Informative Thread
Smartphones are so far ahead of what people use them for, perhaps some are not upgrading every year like they use to. Given the price of the upgrades, inflation and everything else going on, maybe people are keeping them longer too.

Carvana Is Turning Dealerships Into ‘Playgrounds,’ Test-Drive Centers With Sales All Online

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Carvana is testing a radically different new-car dealership model in Dallas, turning the location into a test-drive center and themed “playground" while requiring every purchase to be completed through its online platform. “Every single car that we sell, whether it’s used or new, is online,” said Tom Taira, Carvana president of special projects who’s leading the new vehicle operations. “That’s a very inherent difference. Even coming into the store, you’re buying it online, and that’s a big difference in how people think about it.” The company hopes its no-haggle pricing, hourly employees, service operations, and national logistics network can reshape franchised auto retail. CNBC reports:
Through its used vehicles sales, Carvana has become the most valuable auto retailer in the U.S. with a more than $70 billion market cap. Carvana’s target with the new vehicle business is to grow its market share and customer base as well as assist used vehicle sales through trade-ins and other means, according to Taira. If the company is successful, the strategy could cause a ripple effect across the U.S. franchised dealership model, which the National Automobile Dealers Association reports includes 16,990 retailers that topped $1.3 trillion in sales last year.

[…] Carvana is using a location in Dallas as a test center for its foray into new vehicle sales. The facility looks like a traditional Stellantis dealership from the outside, but the consumer process for purchasing a vehicle and the responsibilities of its employees are unprecedented. Couches and chairs replace cubicles and sales offices. There are no finance and insurance departments, and instead of an army of commission-based employees, the facility has associates that are paid hourly to assist customers — if they want the help.

The experience is meant to be as self-guided as a customer wants. By scanning QR codes located on 10-foot-by-10-foot screens inside the building or on vehicles and displays outside, shoppers can customize a vehicle, learn about a product’s features and conduct test drives before deciding whether to purchase anything. If they do decide to buy something, it’s online and not originated from a sales person, the company said.

The “playground” has roughly 50 vehicles divided by brand, with each having a theme. Jeep has an off-road display. Dodge has race tracks, including a Carvana-themed Charger pace car and part of a traditional track fence barrier. Chrysler minivans, meanwhile, have a soccer net and Ram’s area is truck-centric. Carvana is not committing to expanding the exact experience to its other franchised dealer locations, but Taira told CNBC that the overall process of online sales, vehicle testing and service are expected to be consistent throughout the locations.
Further reading:: Online Car Retailer Launching Nation’s First Car “Vending Machine

Just give me an affordable vehicle …

By Qbertino • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

… that is robust, efficient and that I can maintain and repair myself if the need be. No?
  Ok then, get lost. Thank you.

I like it

By Local ID10T • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

As a consumer, the idea of buying a car without haggling with slimy sales and finance people is enough to make me light headed.

If they can make this work, they have my thanks. IF. They will certainly face severe headwinds from entrenched interests.

Carvana is sketchy as all Hell

By zephvark • Score: 5, Informative Thread

I tried doing business with them twice. Got approved, closed the deal (I thought), and got notified that the deal was canceled days later, before the vehicle was delivered. They claimed they saw some possible fraud in my paperwork, although they wouldn’t explain what. The first time, I’d gone through their own bank and insurance, so I assumed one of them had screwed something up. The second time, using my own bank and insurance… got the same result. My driver’s license is certainly legit, so what else could have gone wrong? They weren’t saying.

I have no idea what kind of scam they’re running but, they don’t seem to be in business to sell cars.

Good, dealer laws need to go

By jacks smirking reven • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

For the obvious reasons that are all being discussed here but in particular car dealers have a tendency to be some of wealthiest business owners in an area and they are overwhelmingly Republican and actively lobby (I think there are a few dealer owners in the House) as well, so for me, if I was in charge in a state reducing their power would be a political imperative as much as a consumer one (really they are intertwined).

  Inside a Key Part of the Republican Base: Car Dealers

Want to Stare Into the Republican Soul in 2023?

For example NADA lobbies over 70% R

https://www.opensecrets.org/industries/indus?ind=T2300

Used cars

By spitzak • Score: 3 Thread

For used cars, at least, I would like to test-drive the actual one I am buying. It is not clear from the description whether this is possible though.

Google, Microsoft, and OpenAI Back Linux Foundation’s Appia AI Standards Initiative

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
BrianFagioli writes:
Google, Microsoft, OpenAI, Arm, Mastercard, Siemens, and other companies have joined the newly launched Appia Foundation under the Linux Foundation. The project aims to create common specifications and assessment frameworks that organizations can use to demonstrate AI systems meet emerging safety, trust, and compliance requirements. According to the Linux Foundation, the framework is designed to allow conformity evidence to be reused across the AI supply chain, potentially reducing duplicate assessments and compliance costs. The announcement comes as governments around the world move toward enforcing AI regulations and organizations face increasing pressure to prove AI systems are trustworthy.
“As international standards and legal frameworks become more established, global organizations need a consistent, practical way to verify that AI systems conform to new expectations,” said Jim Zemlin, CEO of the Linux Foundation. “The Appia Foundation establishes a neutrally governed environment where the entire industry can collaborate on a common assessment framework. By building this infrastructure in the open, we are helping organizations reduce complexity, lower operational costs and build trust.”
Craig Shank, Executive Director of the Appia Foundation, added: “AI systems now make decisions about people’s loans, their children’s schools and their jobs. People on the receiving end deserve to know those systems were built and assessed against criteria that hold up to scrutiny. The Appia Foundation was formed to do that work: creating publicly available specifications that organizations across the AI value chain use to demonstrate their systems meet those criteria. By establishing this open framework, we are building the accountability layer required to scale safe and trusted AI across major industries.”

Anthropic Employees Accuse Trump Administration of Targeting Them

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Anthropic employees say they remain confused and increasingly convinced that the Trump administration is singling out the company after officials gave it less than 90 minutes to disable Fable 5 and Mythos 5 over alleged national security concerns. Cybersecurity experts, however, argue that the cited behavior of helping to identify vulnerabilities in software is also available in rival models and is more valuable to defenders than attackers. The New York Times reports:
Inside the company, employees’ private group chats immediately lit up. Managers were instructed to prepare customers for a potential service disruption to the models, called Fable 5 and Mythos 5. But the messaging kept changing, with workers initially being told that the security problem was the ability of foreign companies to gain access to the systems, and later that a major vulnerability had been discovered in the models.

In employee chats, Anthropic engineers asked one another if the company’s plan to go public this year would be harmed by the White House directive. Many shared news reports that offered conflicting information about why the White House had ordered Anthropic to suspend access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5 for all foreign nationals. “What are you telling your clients?” one employee asked in a chat viewed by The New York Times. Another said, “Does anyone know what to believe?” In another message, a worker said, “I don’t understand what the issue is.”

Six days later, Anthropic’s roughly 3,000 employees still have few answers. The San Francisco company is continuing to grapple with internal confusion as Dario Amodei, the chief executive, and some of his lieutenants meet with the Trump administration to try and resolve the situation. But after discussions on Monday and Tuesday, there was no breakthrough over ending the U.S. order to limit access to the company’s new A.I. models. In a statement on Monday, Anthropic said it would continue meeting with government officials and pledged its “ongoing commitment to working alongside the administration.”

The dispute highlights how singular Anthropic has become in Washington. It was the second time in six months that the fast-growing A.I. start-up has become embroiled in a fight with the Trump administration over its powerful technologies, even as other A.I. companies offer similar models that have not received the same attention. And it has left Anthropic’s employees in what they described as a holding pattern, with some wondering if they were being picked on by President Trump. “Are we being bullied based on bad vibes?” one employee asked in a chat viewed by The Times.
Yesterday, TechCrunch’s Zack Whittaker argued that the move sets a troubling precedent: the government can unilaterally disrupt American software products without court approval, potentially undermining trust in U.S. AI providers.

Re:Of course not!

By GameboyRMH • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The vast majority of voters in any party want the opposite of that but are told to vote for “the lesser of two evils” which admits to an inherently evil system.

This is only possible because the US has first-past-the-post elections, a clunky and primitive voting method that can enable this situation. Moving to more advanced voting methods like ranked choice or STAR voting prevents a two-party stranglehold from forming.

They’re being made an example for others

By Schoenlepel • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

It’s not about whether others have the same capability; it’s because Anthropic refused to allow the US government to use their AIs to be involved in combat action. They’re being turned into an example: “this is what happens to you when you refuse to do as we tell you to.”

Trump really is a fascist and all tech companies should stand together against that clown. However, there’s two things in the mix here which prevent them from standing together: 1) They’re actually afraid, 2) They smell money. Anthropic will be bust soon and when that happens, Trump or some other clown in that government will make a remark which will come down to “Anthropic was your example, you could be next.” Of course not literally that, it will be stated such they can wiggle themselves out from under any wrongdoing allegations, but still, the announcement will be made as soon as Anthropic is off the stage.

Re:They’re being made an example for others

By caseih • Score: 5, Informative Thread

This is incorrect. Anthropic’s deal with the DoD absolutely did involve the use of their models with combat. But the deal signed said that humans would always have the final say (and thus responsibility) for lethal combat action. That was what was agreed by both parties. But the DoD decided to change the terms of the deal and remove the bit about human responsibility. That was something Anthropic rightly disagreed with and besides it wasn’t the agreement the DoD signed.

Funny how this bit gets quickly forgotten.

Fucking Duh!

By SlashbotAgent • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Hegseth literally told them that they would be targeted for retaliation if they didn’t allow the DoD to use their AI without restrictions.

Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth is threatening unprecedented retaliation, potentially labeling Anthropic as a “supply chain risk.” This designation could destroy Anthropic’s business ahead of their expected initial public offering (IPO).

Anthropic held their ground and refused the contract. They are totally on the shit list.

Re:What is socialism?

By jacks smirking reven • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Clinton left office with a budget surplus

Over half of our debt since then is the result of both the 2001 Bush tax cuts and the 2017 TCJA.

Another big chunk is the money Obama had to spend to bail us out from the mess he was left with in 2008 and Biden was left with a similar mess to clean up in 2021 but when they have to spend a bunch of money they get harangued by the same party that caused the issue. It’ll happen again when the next Democrat has to clean up a mess in 2029.

I would submit to you that if you think the two parties are the same you’re not just a fucking moron but a dishonest political actor with an ulterior motive.

Example to your link: there is a bill to ban Congressional Stock trading, why no Republican co-sponsors? Just like AOC rightly pointed out when asked about gerrymandering: There’s a bill on the floor to ban all partisan gerrymandering, why no Republicans vote for it?
.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/…

AI Will Lead To Labor Shortages, Bezos Says In Optimistic Talk

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Reuters:
Artificial Intelligence will lead to labour shortages, not the replacement of humans, Amazon founder Jeff Bezos predicted in a highly optimistic appearance at the VivaTech technology conference in Paris on Wednesday. Bezos put forward a rosy vision of how technology will help humanity, speaking about projects including his space venture Blue Origin and his new AI startup Prometheus, which is aimed at speeding up physical manufacturing. “I know there’s a lot of concern that many people have, including many smart people, that AI is going to make humans redundant and so on,” Bezos said. “I totally disagree with this point of view. And I think, in fact, AI is going to create a labor shortage.”

Half of Americans fear the rise of AI could put them or someone in their household out of work, a Reuters/Ipsos poll found this month. Bezos, the world’s fourth-richest person with a net worth around $250 billion, argued that people have “endless” things to do, and are currently limited by barriers that he said AI would lower. One goal of space exploration is to move polluting industries off Earth, said Bezos, whose Blue Origin aims to compete with trillionaire Elon Musk’s SpaceX in rockets. “If space travel gets reliable enough and inexpensive enough, and we can get materials from asteroids and near-Earth objects and the moon, then this garden planet can be returned to its pre-Industrial Revolution state,” Bezos said.

It’s so hard to get a good domestic these days

By TheMiddleRoad • Score: 5, Informative Thread
Ever since Jervey, Waring, & White shut down.

Hallucinated out of his ass

By Vrallis • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I think Bezos hallucinated this out of his ass…or at least “generatively created” it.

Optimism

By belthize • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Any time a billionaire effectively states the biggest problem facing the masses in the future is too much money I always feel very relieved.

Well…

By LordHighExecutioner • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

…I work in the R&D dept. in a F500 company. Today we had a meeting with our manager, and discussions were all about AI forthcoming applications in our company. The problem of unemployement caused by AI was raised by one od us, as we feared that somebody could be replaced. Our manager was instead very happy about AI, and she told us that now all her slides and reports are quickly prepared using Copilot AI. We - the employees - looked each other smiling…it was now clear who could be replaced by AI soon.

The Internet is a fad

By broward • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

this comment will rival Gates’ clueless comment that “The Internet Is A Fad”.

Bezos apparently has no grasp of history -

https://www.scry.llc/2024/12/2…

“Keynesian theory is right. The real cause of economic depressions is the mismatch between production time and consumption time which occurs gradually as productivity rises. Governments then create make-work jobs in a haphazard attempt to maintain consumption (equilibrium). Eventually, the impedance mismatch leads to collapse and a new system. We are probably on the verge of that change.”

Epic Games Announces Lore Open-Source Version Control System

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Epic Games has released Lore, an MIT-licensed version control system written in Rust and designed specifically for “games and entertainment purposes with large file sizes,” reports Phoronix. From the report:
While there is Git LFS for large file storage with Git, Epic Games has crated Lore as a version control system designed entirely around the large file needs of modern game development as well as multimedia/entertainment purposes. Lore is designed to be fast and efficient for large files including binary files, and be easy-to-use including for 3D artists and more.

The Lore documentation elaborates more on its differences and motivation for development compared to Git: “No existing system was designed for the combination of constraints that large game and entertainment projects require: arbitrary content types, multi-axis scale, multi-tenant safety, and a fully open specification and license. […] Lore is designed to combine what works in each (Git’s content-addressed revision graph and centralized systems): a centralized server-of-record for durability, access control, and conflict resolution; content-addressed storage with fragment-level deduplication that is as effective on a multi-gigabyte binary as on a kilobyte of text; sparse, lazy working copies that materialize only what you need; free branching; and a fully open, publicly versioned specification and MIT license. Normal editing operations — staging, committing, branching, diffing — never require a network round trip.”
You can learn more at Lore.org. All the code is available on GitHub.

Storing ‘Data’

By bill_mcgonigle • Score: 5, Funny Thread

It’s all well and good until Lore steals Data’s emotion chip.

This could actually be great!

By Oh really now • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
I haven’t dug too deeply in the details, but possibly might help in my environment. Maybe. Depends on the people. My art department has a huge file storage problem because they angrily insist on storing all of their collaborative work on a single SMB share. Worse, they choose to work directly on the NAS because that’s how they linked all the assets within their documents. Invariably, they clobber each others work, and Adobe products randomly blow up files. I periodically snapshot the volume but that’s more of a bandaid than a solution. The only problem moving them to a version control system is I’m not quite sure they’d understand enough to use it. They struggle a LOT with the concept of file locations, file times, etc. and literally believe “the system” stores each change they make as they make it. Worse they huff when they find out we can’t go back through each change for them. One dude literally said “the system” only stored some of his edits despite there clearly only being one new file revision on disk.

Perforce

By ajedgar • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Perforce does all of that (and provides Git compatibility) but is not open source. In fact Epic games uses Perforce extensively, so this is there way of getting out from under the licensing fees.

https://www.perforce.com/

Hacking Group Claims Major Hack of Novo Nordisk, Attempted $25 Million Extortion

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Reuters reports a cyber extortion group has claimed responsibility for breaching Novo Nordisk’s network, stealing roughly 1.3 terabytes of data, including source code, drug research, clinical-trial records, employee and physician information, production-system details, and internal AI model data. The group says it’s exploring selling parts of the data after unsuccessfully demanding $25 million from the company. From the report:
FulcrumSec, a cyber extortion group that emerged in October 2025, said in a long message posted to its website that it spent more than two months in Novo Nordisk’s networks stealing data. It said that data included company source code, proprietary information on released and unreleased drugs, trial data, employee, doctor and patient data, information related to company processing facilities and internal AI model information.

[…] FulcrumSec told Reuters in an email that Novo Nordisk representatives contacted the group on June 3, roughly 48 hours after the group’s initial contact to unnamed company executives. The company used a random Proton Mail email address sent to email addresses that FulcrumSec used in its initial outreach, and confirmed it was the company by requesting specific files for verification only the company would know about.

The FulcrumSec representative also said that the group would prefer not to sell data, “as open sourcing it is a more effective deterrent for future companies to avoid paying.” […] FulcrumSec said it would not share some of the data it stole, including information on thousands of company employees and physicians, and roughly 11,500 pseudonymized clinical trial patients. The group said it also would withhold data related to operational technology and software used to interact with sensors and machinery at Novo Nordisk production facilities as part of its “harm-reduction strategy.”
A Novo Nordisk spokesperson said in an email that the company “is aware of claims that data allegedly copied externally without authorization from our systems has been published online. We take this matter seriously and maintain continued operations of our main platforms. We are in contact with the relevant authorities.”

India strikes again

By CEC-P • Score: 3 Thread
I cannot name one single American large medical provider or pharma company that doesn’t outsource its IT engineering and maintenance to clueless Indian companies who rush everything, lie about credentials, and generally just don’t give a shit. Hmm, I wonder what led to this.

Re:India strikes again

By ArchieBunker • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Hmm, I wonder what led to this.

The bean counters and finance bros have calculated the risks to be acceptable.

OpenAI Losses Increased Nearly 8X In 2025, With Spending Hitting $34 Billion

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from independent journalist Ed Zitron:
Today, I can exclusively report, based on audited financial documents viewed by this publication that have been independently verified by the Financial Times, that OpenAI lost around $38.5 billion in 2025, as well as other crucial details about the financial condition of the company. […] At the end of the year, OpenAI had just over $50 billion in assets, with almost half of that in cash. […] The financial condition of OpenAI is deeply concerning. $38.53 billion in losses are astronomical, and far higher than most believed it would be. Losses also appear to be mounting year-over-year at a dramatic rate, and I’m not sure how this company finds a way toward any kind of sustainability or profitability. As discussed, I have not editorialized much today. I believe the best thing I can do for the general public is to deliver this news as plainly as possible.
Ars Technica’s Kyle Orland offers a more editorial take, writing:
All told, OpenAI’s day-to-day “loss from operations” increased from $8.78 billion in 2024 to $20.92 billion in 2025, a concerning direction for a company that is telling investors it hopes to be profitable by 2030. But measured as a percentage of revenues, the company’s operating losses slightly improved year to year, from 237 percent in 2024 to 160 percent in 2025.

Operating numbers aside, OpenAI’s headline “net loss” number of just over $5 billion in 2024 ballooned to nearly $39 billion in 2025. But the 2025 number includes a significant accounting charge related to investor valuations that shifted amid the company’s 2025 conversion to a for-profit structure. The Financial Times cites “a person familiar with the matter” in reporting that this non-recurring charge was approximately $30 billion and that OpenAI’s 2025 net loss amounted to a more reasonable-looking $8 billion without it.

The cost of force

By karmawarrior • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

So you have something that nobody is asking for (not in the way genAI is anyway), and you decide, of all things, rather than making a case for it, you force people to use it, in the hope they get addicted, think they can’t do without it, and continue using it after you start pricing it at profitable levels.

This is the business model. Why are they not making a case for it? Why are they, instead, pretending it’s something it isn’t? Because nobody would take it seriously if they did the latter. The only way they can get people to use it is via force, and that means persuading idiot CEOs with a FOMO issue, while pricing it well below cost.

The question isn’t “Will they make a profit”, that’s not something you or I should care about. Who gives a crap if a bunch of vulture capitalists get busted? The question is “How much damage will they do with this particular con job”.

The end game of this, remember, is to get companies dependent upon genAI companies. To make them unable to function any more without handing over control of their systems to the genAI people. And idiot FOMO CEOs who have gotten the dopamine rush from using genAI tools are making sure their companies will be run that way, despite the obvious dangers.

So the answer to “How much damage” is, so far, a crazy amount. So far. There are now many, many, companies that have lost control and knowledge of how their own businesses run. And it’s getting worse.

Good Luck With the IPO

By 0xG • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Good luck with the IPO, this might put a damper on things.

Spending 3X your revenue

By OrangeTide • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Spending more than your revenue with no answer to when it turns around is a recipe for a bubble.
Yet OpenAI is not the worst offender by a long shot.
ref: Is AI Profitable Yet?

Signed integer

By goombah99 • Score: 5, Funny Thread

well once they crossed 2 billion the signed integer representation made losses into profits

Zitron misses the bigger picture

By zmollusc • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Ed Zitron completely fails to take into account the four factors which will inevitably lead to massive profitability for the AI firms. These are:
1 Stuff
2 Things
3 Misc
4 Other

This is not just my view, it is the informed opinion of experts in the AI field.

Stop Killing Games Fails To Secure EU Law Despite 1.3 Million Signatures

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
The European Commission has declined (PDF) to propose a law requiring publishers to keep discontinued video games playable, despite the Stop Killing Games initiative collecting nearly 1.3 million verified signatures. Instead, it plans to develop a voluntary industry code covering end-of-life transparency and preservation. Dextero reports:
The Commission’s full communication said a legal obligation to keep games playable, as requested by the initiative, “would not be proportionate.” It cited concerns about intellectual property rights, confidential business information, publisher costs, and potential cybersecurity or safety risks once games are no longer supported. The code of conduct could include more transparent storefront labeling about possible game discontinuation, along with more partnerships between publishers and cultural heritage institutions to preserve games. However, it would not legally require publishers to provide offline patches, private server tools, or other methods for players to continue accessing games after official support ends. The Commission also argued that existing EU consumer law already provides some safeguards, including requirements around transparency, contract duration, termination conditions, and possible refunds if a shutdown conflicts with the agreement or a consumer’s reasonable expectations.

[…] Despite the setback, Stop Killing Games has said it is not ending its push for legislation. In a response posted after the Commission’s decision, the official Stop Killing Games account said the outcome was “not unexpected” and claimed the campaign had already prepared for the result. The group said it is now pushing for members of the European Parliament to amend Stop Killing Games into the Digital Fairness Act instead. “We can move on without the Commission and their non-decision,” the group said, referencing earlier comments from Accursed Farms creator Ross Scott.

Commissions position does not matter

By Zarhan • Score: 5, Informative Thread

As it says on the summary already - the fact that we got a non-answer from commission doesn’t matter here. It would have been *nice* to get a legislation from there, but in the end they don’t matter.

Ross Scott explains it better at https://youtu.be/CgoODQFrPgw?t… but the point is that SKG already has majority support in European Parliament, and the plan is basically that SKG gets tacked on by the parliament as an amendment to Digital Services Act (https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/digital-services-act). The DSA is already supposed to do things like rein in lootboxes, so it’s already addressing issues for video games.

Commission’s stance ultimately does not matter here at all. No need to be discouraged.

Re:Commissions position does not matter

By Zarhan • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Sorry, wrong piece of legislation in progress - meant Digital Fairness Act, not Digital Services Act. https://digitalfairnessact.com…

Copyrigh

By MeNeXT • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

was created so artists would release their work to the public and be compensated. So why do we offer copyrights on stuff that is not made available or removed from the market.

How about we change the law into something that removes copyright when it’s not available, or no longer available.

We need to change the laws that allow lock in, or that change the terms after purchase.

Re: Instead, it plans to develop a voluntary indus

By thegarbz • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Has any voluntary industry code and self regulation EVER worked?

Yes. Good examples can be found the world over: Media advertising standards, financial standards, heck the entire engineering profession is self regulated by its own industry. Many reporting standards are as well. As are quite a few product safety standards (the overall “don’t kill people” is law, but how to achieve that is mostly driven by industry self-regulation in many parts of the world).

Now there’s plenty of examples where it also didn’t work, and those often get followed up with actual laws, but there are still plenty of examples in industry where industry codes self regulated. For example when America shat itself in 2008 Australia was largely insulated from the same problems due to the Australian Banking Association’s (industry body) governance code that effectively banned the kind of sub-prime finance dumb-fuckery in the country years earlier.

Want another example? It’s not legally required in most of Europe to label vegan products, yet industry has adopted ISO 23662 despite it not being required by any law to do so. And while we’re talking about standards, the harmonisation of electrical standards in the EU was almost entirely industry driven, and except for subtleties of specific wiring rules for examples in houses, most electrical standards maintained by CENELEC are entirely voluntary yet followed throughout all industry.

Re: Instead, it plans to develop a voluntary indus

By almitydave • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

When it’s codified into the highest law of the land and doesn’t work, and suggestions to do so voluntarily can’t work to the point of being laughable, what options do we have left?

There’s always Nancy Reagan’s catchphrase: Just Say No.

Any particular game is expendable. You won’t miss out on anything. Games don’t even have the network effects and lockin that you get with other types of software; it’s a part of the economy where Just Saying No is easiest of all.

Except when it’s not. It’s not always clear at the time of purchase that the publisher has the ability to shut down the game at some unspecified future date. So “just saying no” requires some knowledge of the future that may not be available. In addition, on platforms like Steam, publishers can push updates that you *must* install to continue playing which remove features or add an online requirement that didn’t exist when you purchased it, leading to it being disabled remotely when the publisher eventually shuts down the servers. The TOS/EULA generally require that you agree to all future updates to the TOS/EULA without notice or ability to opt out, so the consumer really doesn’t have any actual rights to the games they “purchase” in this system.

Even if the outcome of Stop Killing Games isn’t legislation that requires publishers to create tools or release code, an acceptable outcome (IMHO) would be regulation that requires transparency, labeling, and prohibits what’s effectively sabotage so the consumer can make an informed decision and have some guarantee they get what they actually paid for. If a digital storefront carried a disclaimer that said “This game requires an online connection to the publisher’s server to run. The publisher has not guaranteed the server’s operability for any length of time” then a user would at least have the opportunity to consider that risk when purchasing. Additionally, if a regulation prevented publishers from deploying an end-of-life update (a “time-bomb”) that didn’t exist when purchased, that would also protect consumers without harming publishers. So there are some easy approaches here which don’t burden publishers.

Personally, I’d like to see a law that stipulates that any digital good to which your access can be removed by the publisher must be described as either a “rental” or “subscription”, with the length of the term clearly spelled out, with penalties for revoking access before the end of the term. That way, you can know exactly what you’re getting, for how long, and can count on it being there; and publishers can’t trick you into thinking you’re “purchasing” something you aren’t. As much as I love Steam, I’m aware this would include the entire Steam library. The most obvious downside to me is that this would likely lead to the normalization of the idea that you don’t own your video games in general.

AI and Brain-Computer Interface Allow Speechless ALS Patient To Work a Full-Time Job

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
UC Davis researchers say an implanted brain-computer interface has allowed Casey Harrell, an ALS patient who cannot speak, to synthesize sentences from brain activity with 99% accuracy in controlled tests and about 92% accuracy in everyday use. The Register reports that the system has remained usable at home since 2023, helping Harrell communicate naturally, control a computer, and return to full-time work without researchers needing to supervise each session. The Register reports:
A team of scientists from the University of California, Davis, published a paper Monday detailing a years-long study of a brain computer interface (BCI) system implanted in a patient with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS, also known as Lou Gehrig’s disease), which destroys motor neurons and causes loss of motor control and eventual paralysis. According to the team, their patient, Casey Harrell, has been living with BCI implants since 2023 that are still working today, giving him the ability not only to control a computer cursor with his thoughts, but also to speak. […] Davis neurosurgeon David Brandman, co-principal investigator and co-senior author of the paper published Monday, as well as the surgeon who placed Harrell’s implant, described the results his team published as the crossing of a threshold in BCI technology: Not only has Harrell’s implant been working well with daily use since 2023, but it’s also incredibly accurate.

In controlled tests, the system managed to synthesize sentences from Harrell’s brain activity with 99 percent accuracy; outside of the lab in daily use, Harrell still assessed it as being accurate 92 percent of the time. “The key thing to me is that it’s enabling everyday communication for a guy who wants to talk but can’t,” Brandman told The Register in an interview. “Despite being paralyzed [Harrell] has gone back to work full time and has meaningful conversations with his daughter who’s never heard the sound of his voice.”

Prior work in the BCI space, Brandman told us, has either required researchers to be in a patient’s home whenever they’re using the tech, or for the patient to come to the researchers. That’s not the case here, with the system allowing Harrell’s home care team to hook him up to the system themselves, enabling him to use the device for more than 3,800 hours in the past few years. Based on the time the study was filed (It published Monday but went into peer review in July 2025) that would mean Harrell was using the device for more than five hours a day, on average. “It is a life that is more full of dynamic action and with friends and family, with colleagues, and it is something that allows me to communicate more in my natural way of communicating than any other technology that I have experienced,” Harrell told UC Davis via his BCI system.

Dystopian framing

By BrightCandle • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Its a pretty dystopian framing that its enabled him to work instead of being able to speak to his family and friends and do more with their time. Work isn’t the purpose of life but its a marker of the times that this is how this is framed.

Re:Dystopian framing

By Tony Isaac • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

There is something at the core of being human, that needs to do something productive. This is not unhealthy. We have evolved to be compelled to work not because we are somehow “slaves to the system” but because for all of human history, survival literally required work. Work is not a “necessary evil”—work is, in itself, an important part of who we are. This is not dystopian, this is to be celebrated.

Re:Dystopian framing

By Tony Isaac • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

So would you say Stephen Hawking was worse off for using assistive technology to continue his *work* in physics, well into the late stages of his ALS? Not at all! He would have been the first to agree that being able to continue to be productive, was an important part of his life.

ALS is awful. My grandfather died of it, so I’ve seen it up close. But enabling someone with ALS to work is *not* awful, it’s a wonderful gift.

Re:Dystopian framing

By bsolar • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Its a pretty dystopian framing that its enabled him to work instead of being able to speak to his family and friends and do more with their time. Work isn’t the purpose of life but its a marker of the times that this is how this is framed.

The summary also mentions him being able to talk with his daughter. Furthermore, being productive is a very important aspect for many people and while it might not be their whole purpose in life, it’s still typically very important for their self-realization.

Also a professional setting is usually focused at delivering results and that the technology is successful in that setting is indicative of how advanced it has become.

Re:Dystopian framing

By nugatory78 • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
While I don’t have ALS, nor anyone in my family, I do have (at times) debilitating health issues that make me bed ridden. During those times, I would have given a LOT to be able to continue to work. While being stuck in bed unable to do anything except watch TV, I usually feel completely useless. Having the ability to work would have help my mental state immensely.

I also see, that if they can work, it shows how far the tech has gone. If he can work, he certainly can use a computer and talk to anyone for enjoyment.

HPE Tempts VMware Users, Partners With Year of Free Virtualization Software

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica:
Hewlett Packard Enterprise’s (HPE) new virtualization software promotion will likely pique the interest of end users and resellers who are unhappy with Broadcom’s pricing of VMware. During its HPE Discover event in Las Vegas this week, HPE announced that customers could use its “HPE Morpheus Software — VM Essentials” offering for free for “up to one year,” per a press release. HPE’s website describes its virtualization platform as a “VMware alternative.” It includes a hardware virtual machine (HVM) hypervisor and unified management and lets users “manage VMware ESXi and HVM clusters from one console and migrate when you’re ready,” HPE’s website says. “New VM Essentials customers can receive up to one free year of licenses for VM Essentials, a year of HPE Zerto for $1 to support non-disruptive migration to HPE virtual machines, and 0 percent interest on software through HPE Financial Services,” HPE’s announcement reads, referring to HPE’s group for helping IT teams manage funding.

Free for a year is cheaper than what Broadcom has charged for VMware vSphere since taking over. VMware prices have skyrocketed due to VMware’s parent company eliminating perpetual licenses and bundling products into expensive packages. Notably, per its website, HPE recommends charging $600 per CPU socket per year for VM Essentials; Broadcom has controversially shifted vSphere licensing pricing to a per-core basis. “Customers are feeling quite a bit of pain in the change that some of the virtualization companies have put there, specifically Broadcom,” Jeremiah Jenson, VP of HPE’s North American channel and partner ecosystem, told CRN. The executive claimed that VM Essentials could bring up to 90 percent cost savings compared to VMware while also helping to “eliminate vendor lock-in and simplify hybrid IT.”

From March 1 to June 30, HPE has also been offering a free year of VM Essentials via rebate to customers who buy an AMD server and a one-year VM Essentials license. VM Essentials is only available through channel partners, a stark contrast from Broadcom’s VMware approach, where the chip giant has drastically reduced the number of resellers that can sell VMware products. HPE’s new promotion aims to entice customers to more deeply consider migrating off VMware. […] HPE also announced that it would give 600 reseller partners who earn the HPE partner program’s Private Cloud with Virtualization competency by the end of the year free VM Essentials software licenses for three years. Partners still have to pay support costs, though.
The benefit is “a step in the correct direction,” said Dean Colpitts, CTO of Canadian managed services provider (MSP) Members IT Group (MITG), which VMware cut from its reseller program after 19 years of partnership a year ago. However, limiting the promotion to 600 partners is “very shortsighted.” He believes that HPE should give all of its partners VM Essentials “to facilitate getting [VM Essentials] into customer sites and displacing the competitors.”
“They need to fling [VM Essentials] as far and as fast as they possibly [can] to immediately gain traction and draw ISVs to them, which will increase adoption even more,” he said.

Does it really matter?

By jenningsthecat • Score: 3 Thread

The benefit is “a step in the correct direction,” said Dean Colpitts, CTO of Canadian managed services provider (MSP) Members IT Group (MITG), which VMware cut from its reseller program after 19 years of partnership a year ago. However, limiting the promotion to 600 partners is “very shortsighted.” He believes that HPE should give all of its partners VM Essentials “to facilitate getting [VM Essentials] into customer sites and displacing the competitors.”

This strikes me as a rather temporary solution to Broadcom’s dickishness. HP has demonstrated time and time again their willingness to ass-rape customers, at least in the consumer / small business sector. If HP manages to capture the virtualization market, then they’ll repeat Broadcom’s bad behaviour. That’s just what corporations do.

why now?

By Anonymous Coward • Score: 3, Interesting Thread

It’s been three years since the Broadcom acquisition closed. Why was HPE not trying to capture those customers earlier? They bought Morpheus just a year after Broadcom bought VMware.

And why are any customers still on VMware? I know it takes a while to plan migrations but come on now. And Broadcom fired most of the VMware engineers years ago so it’s not like you’re sticking around for the cutting-edge R&D. VMware is in the same bucket as Solaris and has been for a few years now … if you HAVE to stay on the platform, fine, but most customers should have left already.

Anyway Morpheus VM Essentials is just Ubuntu with KVM, it’s nothing special. HPE bought Morpheus for Morpheus Enterprise. VM Essentials was just the toy in the Cracker Jack box. HPE should have either pushed this earlier or killed the product.

Re:why now?

By keltor • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
We tested their project, it’s really rough. No solid path off of VMware and onto Morpheus.

Depending on your situation, your options are basically Nutanix, Microsoft or maybe DIY (if you are big enough, this is what we’re doing.)

Re:Where did this come from?

By ls671 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Yes we use proxmox qemu kvm with own own code for what doesn’t come out of the box. qemu kvm is just as good as anything out there. Proxmox comes with a lot already included and you can run it for free and get updates for free if you enable the dev repository for proxmox packages while the bare metal host is mostly debian running with an optimized proxmox kernel.

Longer trial ?

By petermp • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
So they extend trial from 60 days to 365 Days .....
Great news.......
ESXI - Free forever.
PVE - Free forever.
RedHat Kubernetes VM - Free for Partners.
Suse Virtualizaion - Free forever.
Ovirt - Free foreve.
HyperV 2019 - free for the next 3 years (until is end of support).
HPE - 1 year Trial....

Commodore’s Callback 8020 Is a $499 Flip Phone That Blocks Social Media and Browsers

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot
Commodore has unveiled the Callback 8020, a $499 Sailfish OS flip phone that runs most Android apps but deliberately blocks social media, browsers, email, and workplace apps to discourage doomscrolling. The “not dumb dumbphone” still supports messaging, music, maps, ridesharing, hotspots, a removable battery, and plenty of Commodore nostalgia. “The phone uses T9-style texting with predictive input, includes Commodore SID ringtones, ships with a selection of Commodore and Sailfish games, and even includes Snake,” reports TechSpot. From the report:
Commodore says it has developed patent-pending technology that prevents browsers and social media apps from being sideloaded, while DNS-level blocking should stop them from working even if someone finds a way to install them. Users can still sideload nearly anything else if it’s not available on the Commostore, but apps designed for doomscrolling remain off limits. That means useful services such as WhatsApp, SMS, Signal, Telegram, WeChat, Spotify, Uber, Lyft, maps, podcasts, QR scanning, voice notes, and hotspot support work, but the likes of Instagram, TikTok, Facebook, Gmail, and browsers do not.

The Callback 8020 has a 3.25-inch 480 x 640 internal display, a MediaTek Helio G81 chip, 4GB of RAM, 64GB of storage, a 48MP Sony rear camera, an autofocus front camera, dual SIM support, USB-C, a headphone jack, FM radio, and something many of us miss from flagships: a removable battery. There’s no 5G as Commodore argues that 4G VoLTE and Wi-Fi better fit a device meant to discourage constant streaming and scrolling. […] The main screen is touch-capable but disabled by default, while the outer display keeps things deliberately sparse, showing basics such as time, battery, signal, and notifications via dome LEDs.

The 8020 name is a nod to Commodore’s 8010 modem from 1980. The phone comes in ProtoPET White, SX Silver, BASIC Beige, a translucent Starlight Edition, and a gold Founders Edition with a 24-karat gold-plated Commodore button. Standard models start at $499, the Starlight version is $549.99, and the Founders Edition costs $640. Preorders open June 30, with shipping targeted for winter.
You can watch the launch ad on YouTube.

Brand necrophilia at its worst

By larwe • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

This is the retrocomputing equivalent of the Trump T1 phone, and I’m far from the only person saying this. Fundamentally, there are two groups of people in this world: People who think having a YouTube influencer buy a venerable brand to “reboot” it is a good idea, and people who recognize this for the quintessential grift it is. Oh, and then there are people who don’t have any emotional investment in Commodore - but based on a sampling of the people I communicate with regularly, there are very few of those. The kindest thing that can be said about Perifractic is that he started out running a reasonably interesting retrocomputing channel, but he slid through a one-way sphincter straight down the colon of SEO and YouTube monetization, never to return. (Pointlessly long intros and stretched content to maximize ad impressions and keep the “suspense” coming to meet minimum view time quotas, careful scrubbing of language, clickbait thumbnails and video titles - everything bad you can think of is there).

What is being done with the Commodore indicia now is a deplorable embarrassment to the community of Commodore collectors, historians and aficionados, on par with the ludicrous “PET phone” that was created by some bootleg company in Italy a few years ago.

You know it kind of bugs me

By rsilvergun • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
To see commodore or the husk that is commodore taking advantage of people who have mental issues when those people with the mental issues are looking for something like this because another company is taking advantage of them.

There’s just something uniquely fucked up about a clearly substandard product that exists specifically to cater to someone who can’t just uninstall Facebook and twitter, and again I am not blaming people for that Lord knows I have my own mental issues as my detractors will no doubt a test to. But there’s something really fucked up about selling what’s very obviously a $150 device, I mean for fuck sakes it’s a cheap Media tech phone with a cheap display, and charging a premium because the phone blocks apps that the person buying it knows they can be tricked into installing even though those apps make their lives objectively worse.

It’s also possible that this is going to get marketed to kids but again you have a bunch of people doing a fucked up thing and another bunch of people selling a product to solve the problem caused by the first fucked up thing. How about we just don’t do the fucked up things in the first place?

It really is peak capitalism though I’ll give them that. One group of capitalists Selling me a substandard solution to a problem created by another group of capitalists.

Re: You know it kind of bugs me

By Powercntrl • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Phones that run stock Android are usually pretty good at letting you uninstall/disable anything you don’t want. On the iOS side, Apple is also pretty good about letting you get rid of the preloaded apps (which are all first party - Apple doesn’t allow preloaded 3rd party bloatware) you have no interest in using.

Re:Whitelisting? That trick never works

By votsalo • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Anti-freedom ?

If you create your own website, the phone won’t be able to display it. That’s why it is anti-freedom. A browser is an operating system on its own that runs on many devices, including iphones and most Android phones (except this one). Blocking browsers means that the phone can run only Android apps, not web apps.

If you don’t like it, don’t buy it there are a ton of alternative

If you like it, buy it. But make an informed choice.

Be a great phone to give kids though, you know that parental responsibility thing where they can keep kids away from the BS.

Assuming you don’t want your kid to access any websites, including their school website, your family website (if you have one) a weather station website, government websites, or their own websites, if you kids have learned to build one.

blocking social

By gary s • Score: 3 Thread
People, you do know that if you dont install the social media apps you will block them. Not sure I need a special phone to do that.