Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Star Trek Turns 60
  2. Google Will ‘Degrade’ Search In Europe to Avoid EU Fines
  3. Feds Accuse China of ‘Systematic’ Distillation of US AI Models
  4. Meta Debuts Muse, Its Long-Planned Personal AI Agent
  5. Australia To Let Social Media Users ‘Opt Out’ of Algorithm-Based Feeds
  6. A Secret New Elizabeth Holmes Documentary Stuns Telluride
  7. LG TVs Caught Spying Even When Offline or On Standby
  8. Google DeepMind Publishes AI-Powered Predictions For Effect of All 9 Billion Mutations to Human DNA
  9. Teen Reading Slumps to Worst This Century Due to Surge in Screen Time
  10. Secretive DHS ‘Predictive Policing’ Unit Is Analyzing Americans’ Financial Habits, Pulling Them Over
  11. AMD Working To ‘Push Rust Deep into the GPU Stack’
  12. Three Cities, 16 Years And $1 Billion Later, ‘Defiant’ Lucas Museum of Narrative Art Opens To Mixed Reviews
  13. Why Google Told Drivers to Drive a Longer Way On Purpose
  14. Does Brave Browser Load Faster Than Chrome, Firefox, and Microsoft Edge?
  15. Switzerland’s Federal Government Tests Open-Source Alternatives to Microsoft on 3,000 Computers

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Star Trek Turns 60

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
“Star Trek” marks its 60th anniversary today, September 8, six decades after the original series premiered in 1966 and went on to become one of the most successful science-fiction franchises in television history. Outlets across the web are commemorating the milestone with full health reports, hot takes, behind-the-scenes retrospectives, and reflections on the franchise’s influence and what may lie ahead. The New York Times reports:
As of 2026, the 60-year-old science fiction franchise boasts a fandom of carbon units — sorry, humans — that spans at least three generations. What began, in 1966, as a five-year space mission on the U.S.S. Enterprise to “boldly go where no man has gone before” now represents an anthology of space travel across more than 25 series and films in parts of two centuries. Where once it was James T. Kirk or bust, it’s not unusual to find fans who prefer other captains, like Picard, Janeway or Sisko. There are so many series to keep track of that fans often communicate using country code-like abbreviations for each installment: TOS (the original series), TNG (“The Next Generation”), DS9 (“Deep Space Nine”), ENT (“Enterprise”) and so on.

Outside the Trekiverse, disparities in generational slang, politics and social mores are practically a foregone conclusion. But “Star Trek” functions as connective tissue between fans past and present. Some of that tissue is just shared references: There will always be captain’s logs, timelines by stardate, warp factors one through 10, phasers and photon torpedoes and, every now and then, a doctor who insists, “I’m a doctor, not a ____!” The Vulcan salute has become a general symbol of geek-recognize-geek, but real Trekkies (or Trekkers, as some prefer) know that “Live long and prosper” is only half the message; the recipient is meant to say “Peace and long life” in response. But the series’ staying power, and the ease with which each generation finds its way into them, is an indication that fans of all ages share not only language, but values, in common.
Here are some of our favorite Slashdot stories from the early days. The 2004 “Should Star Trek Die?” is an especially good callback today because it features LeVar Burton (Geordi La Forge in Star Trek: The Next Generation) arguing that Trek needs to disappear for several years to become special again…
Star Trek Lawsuit (1998)
Salon Writes on The Troubles with “Trek” (1999)
Star Trek’s Next Series (2001)
Should Star Trek Die? (2004)
UPN Officially Cancels ‘Star Trek: Enterprise’ (2005)

Google Will ‘Degrade’ Search In Europe to Avoid EU Fines

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Google says it will overhaul Search in Europe to comply with the EU’s Digital Markets Act, giving more prominence to comparison services like Expedia and Hotels.com while stripping some real-time features from hotel, airline, and restaurant results. “These changes degrade the user experience for Europeans — boosting online intermediaries at the expense of local businesses, and removing helpful features people rely on every day,” said Nick Fox, senior vice-president of knowledge and information at Google. The company claims its past search changes for DMA compliance were tied to a 30% decrease “in free, direct booking traffic to European businesses.” Engadget reports:
That sanction was the latest salvo between the EU government and a US tech company for infringing on its Digital Markets Act. The debate centers on the DMA requirement that major tech brands “must not treat their own services more favorably in ranking than third-party services.”

[…] According to Reuters, Google’s revised search results “will highlight one specialized search engine at the top of the page, followed by two others with fewer details. A carousel of hotels, airlines and restaurants, for example, will sit below them with key features such as real-time prices stripped out.” Those specialized engines include sites like Expedia or Hotels.com, also known as vertical search services, so European users may soon see those aggregators and comparison sites prioritized more highly than individual businesses’ websites in their results.

Reuters noted that “the rankings will be determined by Google’s algorithm,” meaning the tech company still holds a lot of control over how results are displayed. The EC had given Google 60 days to comply with its rules, but the company has not specified an exact timeline for when European users will start seeing the changes.

It’s… it’s… it’s…

By greytree • Score: 3 Thread
It’s almost as if Google is evil and needs to be totally regulated by governments so they comply with what we should be able to expect of an omnipresent company.

Already?

By wgoodman • Score: 3 Thread

Google search is already heavily degraded by all of that crap.

While this might degrade the user experience

By taustin • Score: 3 Thread

this isn’t intended to protect that. It’s intended to protect their competitors. Which it may or may not do well, but Google whining about user experience is an open admission that they know full well they are the problem.

‘Degrade’…

By fuzzyfuzzyfungus • Score: 3 Thread
Pity the poor Europeans, crying out without the bot slop occupying the top half of the results. I wonder what Google is going to do to ensure that the ‘degraded’ results aren’t universally preferred to the alternative?

Feds Accuse China of ‘Systematic’ Distillation of US AI Models

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
The NSA, CISA, and FBI are accusing (PDF) several Chinese AI companies of carrying out “industrial-scale” distillation campaigns against leading U.S. models such as ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Grok. Since at least 2024, the companies have allegedly routed millions of requests across accounts, APIs, proxies, cloud providers, and third-party aggregators to extract capabilities for their own models. “China-based artificial intelligence companies are conducting systematic extraction of proprietary functionalities and capabilities of U.S. AI companies’ models through industrial-scale knowledge distillation campaigns that form the core — not merely a supplement — of their AI development strategy,” the agencies wrote. CyberScoop reports:
DeepSeek, for example, distilled frontier U.S. models to generate synthetic training data for its R1 and R3 models, including four different versions of Claude, two versions of Gemini, five versions of ChatGPT and Grok 4. Those models helped train DeepSeek’s capabilities in areas like agentic functioning, question and answer optimization, creative and occupational writing and others.

Another Chinese company, Moonshot AI, allegedly distilled 18 different U.S. models — including Fable 5, Anthropic’s current, most advanced commercially available model — to train its Kimi-K2 and Kimi K3 models. The company used millions of queries meant to extract enhanced capabilities in areas like agentic reasoning, coding and data analysis, computer vision, larger logical frameworks, visual processing and others.

Chinese AI companies manage a sophisticated set of tools and systems that route requests and prompts through multiple pathways to avoid detection. The advisory lists common tactics observed by Chinese companies, including spreading requests across different accounts, models and platforms, using native APIs, remote cloud providers, and third-party aggregators to obfuscate user metadata, and leveraging proxies and gray tech markets to get around geographic restrictions, terms of use and safeguards built into frontier models.

Oh no!

By paul_engr • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Don’t let them steal the shit that was made by stealing shit!

So what?

By kertaamo • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

So the accusation is that the Chinese obtained all the information they required from the US LMM creators.
But those US LLM creators obtained all the information they need from all of the users of the internet. Without any permission or compensation or even credit.

I don’t think they have a leg to stand on in that accusation.

So AI Finances dependant on Chinese accounts?

By ealbers • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Does that mean most of the paid accounts of openai and anthropic are Chinese accounts?

Not a good look for a IPO

Re:Lolol

By ceoyoyo • Score: 5, Informative Thread

They’re not stealing, and its not copyrightable. They’re signing up, paying the requested amount, sending queries and accepting the responses.

“Accuse”

By reanjr • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

The word “accuse” is being used as if it’s some sort of crime or unethical to engage in this behavior. It is not. This is the inevitable result of a retarded business model pushed by well-connected tech morons like Sam Altman.

Meta Debuts Muse, Its Long-Planned Personal AI Agent

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Meta has launched Muse, a personal AI agent developed under chief AI officer Alexandr Wang. “The product, long in development, was touted as a key next step by CEO Mark Zuckerberg in his recent 6,500-word manifesto,” reports Axios. From the report:
Muse, as the agent is known, exists in a chat interface, similar to a text thread. It’s designed to be more proactive and long-running than typical chatbots. Users can name their agent, create an avatar and customize how it communicates. The Muse agent runs on a dedicated virtual machine in Meta’s cloud, using a built-in browser that’s visible to the user.

Meta is offering a free tier of Muse, as well as two subscription options, at $20 per month and $100 per month. “For the vast majority of users, they should be able to do what they need to within the free tier,” Wang told Axios. “But for real power users, you know, those subscription tiers help us cover the computer costs.” There is no advertising within Muse, but Wang said the company is exploring commerce opportunities that could generate additional revenue. Initially Muse will be available in the U.S. and works on iOS, Android and the web, with support coming soon for Meta’s AI glasses.
“The full vision in the future is we want to develop personal superintelligence that helps people accomplish their goals, pursue their passions, build things that they never would have built if they didn’t have the technology,” Wang told Axios.
Meta offers users more privacy controls with Muse than in its previous AI products, including the option to prevent queries from being used by Meta and a planned confidential mode where the company cannot see activity inside a user’s virtual workspace. There’s also an entirely separate system called Sentinel that governs Muse’s access to the internet and connected services.

Just imagine the additional amount of data…

By ffkom • Score: 3 Thread
… Meta can extract from you (and sell for profit) once their software is used for whatever you lazily delegate to it. Plus they can teach their “agent” to spend your money on Meta products as often as possible.

Australia To Let Social Media Users ‘Opt Out’ of Algorithm-Based Feeds

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Australia is proposing the "My Feed, My Way" initiative that would force social media platforms to let users over 16 turn off algorithmic recommendations and instead see only posts from people and creators they follow. Platforms that fail to comply could face fines of up to $79 million. CNBC reports:
The legislation, which is being drafted and released Tuesday for targeted consultation, would require platforms to send notifications to new and existing users so they can choose their default feed. […] The measures, set to be introduced to the Parliament of Australia this year, will also require AI chatbots, online games and other digital services to take action to protect under-18s from addictive design features.
“This is not about giving government control. It’s about giving people control. It’s about putting choice back into the hands of Australians online,” said Prime Minister Anthony at a press conference on Tuesday.

“This is sensible, pragmatic, practical reform. It gives users choice, and it will hold the big tech companies responsible for inaction.”

clueless

By flippy • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
When will politicians realize that fines like $79 million are rounding errors to these companies? It’s not a fine, it’s a cost of doing business to them. Because of that, even if this passes it will be useless.

Mixed feelings

By Powercntrl • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

On one hand, this feels like government overreach.
On the other hand, don’t threaten me with a good time.

Isn’t that backwards?

By medusa-v2 • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
It says “let users over 16” opt out, but wouldn’t it be more to the point if it were “only users over 16 can opt-in?”

Re:It’s a for profit business

By gurps_npc • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

You have fallen victim to several errors associated with Laissez-faire capitalism. I am a strong proponent of Capitalism but the issues you describe are inherently incorrect.

1) They do not need to prove it is harmful, capitalism routinely engages in preventative regulations. There are legal rules on things like the width of roads, medication use by dates, ingredients in food, etc. It is up to the business to show that their practices do no harm, not the other way around.

2) The client cannot easily vote with their presence/$$$ or presence because the social Media industries have no direct competition and MASSIVE problems ‘transferring’ accounts - problems the companies create.

3) If their business hinges on algorithms is irrelevant. No one is entitled to a profit. You must earn the profit by winning the competition within the rules the country creates. If one country handicaps the industry, so what? 90% of the profit will still be there - to be earned by the company that best competes within the rules the government . Sure, they may make 10% less compared to social media in other countries, but they will still make a profit and the loss is a small price to pay for the benefit of society.

Re:clueless

By HiThere • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Well, the CEO won’t be in Australia, so they’re going to have to operate through extradition proceedings. Good Luck.

A Secret New Elizabeth Holmes Documentary Stuns Telluride

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from TechCrunch:
Telluride just managed one of its best-kept secrets in years, per The Hollywood Reporter. On Sunday night, festival-goers filed into a 650-seat theater with their phones locked away, having no idea what they were about to see, told only that it ran nearly three hours, hadn’t been shown anywhere, and that its principal creators would be in the audience. The surprise premiere they went on to enjoy is a new documentary from co-directors Nathan Fielder and Lance Oppenheim about Theranos founder Elizabeth Holmes.

Called “You Can See Everything,” the film is said to capture Holmes and her husband, Billy Evans, in the 34 days before she reported to federal prison in May 2023 to begin an 11-year sentence for defrauding investors about her blood-testing technology. Since then, her legal fight has limped along without success. Her appeals to overturn the conviction and shorten her sentence were rejected in February of last year. She then went a different route last year, asking President Trump to commute her sentence. That clemency petition is still listed as pending, meaning it’s officially been opened and remains under review.

Fielder apparently lived in the couple’s guest house during filming — the access they provided sounds shocking — but some of the buzz also ties to an A-list actress who becomes part of the story itself. A24 is set to release the film in October.
You can watch a trailer for the film on YouTube.

Re:Um, stuns?

By korgitser • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
If someone came to me and thought I would watch three hours of that sociopath con job, I would be stunned too…

Re:It’s just like The Osbornes!

By Powercntrl • Score: 4, Informative Thread

I really don’t understand why this is even that newsworthy. The last time I recall some documentary making it into the mainstream headspace was during Covid when everyone watched that Tiger King thing because Netflix’s algorithm was like “You’ve binge watched Stranger Things fifteen times and seen everything else that’s halfway decent - here’s this random documentary that you’ll probably tolerate because it’s at least in English.”

Re:Couldn’t imagine…

By alvinrod • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Do you regularly go to film festivals? The people who regularly do are the sort of people who tend to follow the industry closely and know a lot about upcoming films in much the same way that posters here follow rumors about unreleased tech products. For them the prospect of being one of a few hundred people who get to screen something that no one else has seen before or even heard about is going to be an alluring proposition, in much the same way that plenty of people here would jump at the opportunity to beta test some secret new tech product that’s been kept under wraps during development. Maybe it will be a waste of time, but the potential is what draws us in.

Re: It’s just like The Osbornes!

By ThurstonMoore • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

It’s called a Slashvertisment, someone paid for this shit “story” to be here. If it wasn’t we’d know the mystery actress by the end of the summary.

A clear case of fictional prescience :o

By Mirnotoriety • Score: 4, Informative Thread
Hawaii Five-O S01E19 (1969): Medical quack Dr. Fremont claims to have a machine that detects disease from a single blood drop. McGarrett swaps out the blood sample for vegetable oil exposing her as a fraud.

LG TVs Caught Spying Even When Offline or On Standby

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
A Gamers Nexus investigation found that LG smart TVs are almost constantly logging and uploading data about owners and their homes, even while they are offline or in standby mode. “The company’s TV sets scan Wi-Fi networks for nearby devices, record audio logs through their microphones, and use audio and video sampling to recognize exactly what you’re watching from across the TV inputs,” reports The Verge. From the report:
Gamers Nexus partnered with fellow YouTubers Level1Techs and independent security researchers for the investigation, which involved testing retail LG OLEDs. Packet captures showed the TVs scanning the local area network for nearby hardware like phones or smartwatches, as well as logging location data and details of nearby Wi-Fi networks, and feeding the information back to LG Ad Solutions. Perhaps more concerningly, the TVs were capable of recording microphone audio when in standby; this continued even after the TV was disconnected from the internet, with audio files stored offline and uploaded once a connection was restored.
Earlier this year, LG was found to be silently installing an adware-like app on Windows PCs that ran pop-up ads for other LG apps and even McAfee antivirus.

Nope

By nehumanuscrede • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

TV can’t do much in the way of spying if I don’t connect it to the internet now can it ?

Run it through other hardware ( assuming you trust it ) that is internet connected and let
said hardware simply pass the audio / video to your TV.

Re:Nope

By JaredOfEuropa • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
Until they get an edge TPU to process the locally gathered data and send the results (now much reduced in size compared to the raw data) to the mothership, using 4G/5G. Like modern cars are already doing.

Re:Water is wet

By dmomo • Score: 5, Informative Thread

That doesn’t mean drawing outrage and attention to it isn’t useful. If bad corporate behavior isn’t verified and amplified, no action will be taken against it.

Re: Water is wet

By JustAnotherOldGuy • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

but you can for instance revoke all microphone consent and avoid any concerns of your audio being sent to LG.

Trusting LG to stop spying on me by telling them “stop spying on me” requires a level of trust I simply do not have. Does anyone really believe that LG will honor any of your choices?

I seriously hope no one thinks that clicking a checkbox actually turns off the LG spy features, because I’m pretty sure it doesn’t.

Re:Water is wet

By nullgreen • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
Yes, it’s obviously malicious. No media device needs to enumerate all devices in the local network and send the list to the mothership.

Google DeepMind Publishes AI-Powered Predictions For Effect of All 9 Billion Mutations to Human DNA

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Google DeepMind has released AlphaGenome Atlas, a free research database containing AI-generated predictions for the effects of all 9 billion possible single-letter mutations in the human genome. Built from its AlphaGenome model, the atlas is designed to help scientists interpret both protein-coding and harder-to-understand regulatory DNA. Fortune reports:
AlphaGenome Atlas, as DeepMind calls the database, is a precomputed catalogue of what each substitution of a single DNA base is likely to do to the machinery that switches genes on and off. Until now researchers had to run such a model one variant at a time or had to test variants in the laboratory, a process that was painstakingly slow. It would have taken many human lifetimes to discover the consequences of all 9 billion possible single-letter mutations. The Atlas promises to make the job of biologists and medical researchers considerably easier, potentially speeding up the understanding of genetic diseases and the hunt for possible cures.

Pushmeet Kohli, DeepMind’s vice president for research and head of its AI for science team, told reporters on a briefing call that this was the first time any researcher in the world could reach a comprehensive map of human genetic variation “by simply opening a browser.” Kohli also framed the release as helping to complete the unfinished business of the Human Genome Project, which in 2003 succeeded in mapping the entire human DNA sequence. “As the saying goes, we bought the book,” he said, “but we did not understand how to read it.”

Atlas is available for non-commercial use from today through a website Google DeepMind has set up for it. The company said it would be available for commercial use through a licensing arrangement through Google Cloud “soon.” Kohli said that Google DeepMind’s sister company,ÂIsomorphic Labs, which is using AI for drug discovery, would have access to Atlas but that it would also require a commercial license for access. He did not specify exactly what the terms would be for commercial licensing. A paper describing the Atlas and how it was created is being released on bioRxiv, a repository for biomedical preprint academic papers.

Sadly 10 Billion of them

By Growlley • Score: 3 Thread
turn you into Aqua Man.

Best guess != labwork

By pla • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

this was the first time any researcher in the world could reach a comprehensive map of human genetic variation “by simply opening a browser.”

Not quite. This is the first time any researcher in the world can get an AI’s best guess as to what each single substitution might do. All that “painfully slow” research of testing actual variants in the lab is, by contrast, real data.

Don’t get me wrong, this is very, very cool, and will almost certainly lead to a lot of new discoveries - Along with a lot of false positives and dead-ends. I’m not even an AI hater, despite having serious reservations about alignment. This, however, is exactly the type of inquiry where AI hallucinates the worst: An open-ended “what if” question where the answer isn’t allowed to be “I don’t know”.

Here’s a quick sanity check every one of us should do occasionally - Go ask ChatGPT a subtle open-ended “why” question in your own field of expertise… And have a good laugh at how hilariously wrong the answer is.

Teen Reading Slumps to Worst This Century Due to Surge in Screen Time

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Teen reading, math, and science scores have fallen to their lowest levels since international PISA testing began in 2000, with 15-year-olds now reading at roughly the level previously expected of students a year younger. The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) linked weaker results to more screen time, less reading for pleasure, and digital distraction. It also found that students who regularly used AI chatbots for tasks like drafting essays and summarizing text scored about 20 points lower in science, roughly equivalent to a year of learning. Reuters reports:
A 2012 reading high of 501 on PISA’s index had declined to a score of 466 last year. The test is widely regarded as the world’s leading gauge of educational performance and its results are closely scrutinized by governments and educators. “In reading, more screen time and less reading for pleasure have gone hand in hand with weaker results,” OECD head Mathias Cormann told a press conference. “We’re also seeing more hasty reading, students rushing through a text and giving a quick wrong answer.”

Reading scores fell more sharply in students from better-off backgrounds, the study added. Hindered by falling reading standards, average teenage science and maths skills were also at their lowest this century. Science fell from a 2009 high of 506 on the index to 486, while maths was down from 502 to 469 in the same period. East Asia was the best-performing region. Chinese cities that participated in the test, Japan, Korea, Singapore and Taiwan had the best educational systems with Britain and Estonia the only countries outside the region that made it into the top 10 in reading, mathematics and science.

British news is slightly different

By mccalli • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
I’m British, and have been following this from the other side of the story. In the UK it’s more fragmented - this year England is up, but Scotland and Wales are down and in some cases quite significantly. Wales seems to have taken a hell of a hit in reading for instance.

It’s better news in maths and science but we’re still behind where we were five-seven years ago except for science. Definitely a mixed bag, though all improvements are welcome of course.

Re:School Requirements

By CubicleZombie • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

They should let kids choose their own books to read. If I hadn’t discovered the sci-fi aisle at the library on my own, Of Mice and Men in 12th grade would have been the last book I ever read. Kids should learn that reading is fun when they’re not doing it for a grade.

Re:School Requirements

By taustin • Score: 5, Informative Thread

It’s a choice made by teachers.

It should be. But more and more these days, teachers get overruled by higher up, including school boards.

Re:compassion fails again

By Targon • Score: 5, Informative Thread

It’s not the teachers doing it, it is the school administrators and school boards who don’t want to lose financial help if the students aren’t above a certain level. Conservatives here in the USA who are more concerned with their religion than making sure students can actually understand what is going on have gotten far too much control of school districts around the country.

Re:Someday it will resurge like vinyl records.

By Zero__Kelvin • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Why you need articles when there is actual video of him saying it? If you weren’t getting your knowledge of the Trumpsterfire from Fox “News” you would have already seen the videos of him saying this, and a plethora of even more idiotic and ignorant things. If you really want proof, try learning how to use Google. Don’t expect us to educate you when you are making zero effort to get an education yourself.

Secretive DHS ‘Predictive Policing’ Unit Is Analyzing Americans’ Financial Habits, Pulling Them Over

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from 404 Media:
Border Patrol is running secretive predictive policing units that analyze Americans’ financial activity and other data, then feed that intelligence to local police who pull people over who are not suspected of any specific crime, but which the government thinks may be worth searching, 404 Media has found. The units, the name of which 404 Media is revealing here for the first time, are called Predictive Intelligence Targeting Teams (PITT). In one case, a PITT analyzed the financial activity of a man who was driving across Montana, and local authorities stopped him under the pretense of an obstructed license plate and charged him with a DUI.

404 Media identified one PITT in the Spokane Sector, Washington, which polices the U.S. border with Canada, and another in the Laredo Sector, Texas, which polices the border with Mexico. The findings add to an Associated Press investigation from last year which found Border Patrol was using automatic license plate readers (ALPRs) as part of the same wide-spanning predictive policing program. “The bottom line is genuine probable cause cannot be synthetically generated,” Jake Laperruque, deputy director of the Security and Surveillance Project at the Center For Democracy & Technology, told 404 Media in an email. Here Border Patrol seems to be “using parallel construction to cloak the reason behind its car stops in secrecy. If we can’t meaningfully review and evaluate these systems, we can’t trust them,” he added.

[…] The DHS document obtained by 404 Media shows that Border Patrol is analyzing the financial activity of Americans to find people to pull over. The Associated Press’s investigation found the predictive policing program is also heavily using ALPRs to track potential targets’ movements. It is not clear how exactly Border Patrol is monitoring Americans’ financial activity. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) declined to answer what financial activity the agency was monitoring, and whether it obtained a warrant or not.
A CBP spokesperson told 404 Media in an email: “U.S. Border Patrol uses intelligence-informed analysis and planning to support national security operations, allocate resources, and help identify potential threats and bad actors to public safety. These efforts are conducted consistent with applicable law, policy, privacy protections, and oversight requirements.”
The statement continued: “For operational security reasons, we do not discuss specific analytical methods, data sources, targeting criteria, investigative techniques, system capabilities, or deployment details. Public disclosure of such information could compromise law enforcement operations and investigations as well as creating safety risks for agents and the public.”

Rob Frommer, senior attorney at the Institute for Justice, told 404 Media: “The government’s increasing use of mass surveillance — whether that surveillance comes via ALPRs, financial records, or the like — coupled with predictive policing is a recipe for tyranny. We fought a revolution for the idea that we are citizens, not subjects. Yet schemes like CBP’s Predictive Intelligence Targeting Team treat all Americans as if they are potential suspects. This is not just wrong, it’s unconstitutional, and IJ will keep pushing courts and Congress to end this attack on Americans’ security.”

Re: Well come on bootlickers

By BytePusher • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Just look into qualified immunity and civil asset forfeiture. The police think they can get away with this kind of thing, because they can get away with this kind of thing in a police state.

Re: Wouldn’t any judge throw out every case?

By reanjr • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The whole point of parallel construction is that you find alternative legal bases for bringing in evidence. The fact that the officers can’t be trusted has little impact on the evidence being admissable and damning.

“I’ve done nothing wrong, I don’t care it.”

By gurps_npc • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

This is another nail in the “I’ve done nothing wrong, let them look” argument.

The question is not whether you’ve done anything wrong, but whether the government has done anything wrong. When they refuse to disclose their methodology they are ALWAYS doing something wrong.

The entire point of a free society is that we do not have to nor can we trust the police. Time after time we see they are not significantly better than the general population. If we let them hide their process, it always devolves into an abusive process that targets innocent people and destroys their lives.

Re:Well come on bootlickers

By smooth wombat • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Ah yes, the censorship that still allowed people to see the lies about ivermectin. Clearly an abuse of power to let people see the lies. And no, the technologies in this story were not used by Biden. So another lie which isn’t being censored.

Mandatory vaccinations were for a select group of people: i.e. the military and medical workers. No one else was required to get a vaccination.

But please, continue licking RFK, Jr’s boots. He needs all the help he can get.

Re:Well come on bootlickers

By jhoegl • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
“going towards authoritarianism” and supporting “border patrol, ICE, police, military, and prisons”, is the same thing.
You should look up how there are so many people who are here trying to get citizenship, and why the lag of getting them in as citizens is there. (Hint, defunding of the Immigration courts over 20+ years, you can literally see it in statistics).
Immigration is needed for our country, and that is who we are as a country. So its odd you think it is the worst thing.
And lets address your racist comment, you do know that people of all colors have been here well before the 1980s, which BTW, had a way higher crime rate than right now.
Are you even from the USA? Feels like you dont know anything about this country.

AMD Working To ‘Push Rust Deep into the GPU Stack’

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Phoronix reports:
AMD is building out what they are describing as an “elite” team of developers for driving Rust code “deep into the GPU stack” from firmware to drivers, shader compilers, and other GPU software in Rust. AMD Senior Fellow Harsh Meno posted this week to LinkedIn about this new effort…

And note this AMD job posting that’s active for hiring a software development engineer to work on Rust code…

“We are building next-generation systems software for AMD GPUs with Rust as a core technical direction. The work spans compilers, runtimes, low-level GPU software, firmware, developer tooling, and methods for improving the safety and correctness of complex hardware-software systems.

“Rust is not incidental to this role. You will help establish how Rust is used in performance-sensitive and high-trust parts of the GPU stack, including the compiler and tooling support, system interfaces, engineering practices, and validation methods required for production deployment. You will have the opportunity to influence both near-term implementations and the longer-term architecture for using Rust across current and future AMD platforms.”
“AMD also isn’t alone,” the article points out, “as NVIDIA has also been pursuing similar Rust-based initiatives for their GPU software too, including the development of the Nova Linux kernel driver written in Rust.”

Re:Artificial Intelligence

By SlashbotAgent • Score: 5, Informative Thread

I understand. It’s true most AIs can generate code in virtually any language. But, my experience has been that the code quality drops precipitously if the language is not one of the ones I’ve mentioned and as the code base grows.

SQL is great. C and C# not so great. Powershell, surprisingly bad after about 50 or more lines.

Re:The latest New Shiny Bandwagon …

By mattr • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Not a Rust / GPU dev but what I got from some articles is it greatly reduces the surface area in which memory safety bugs can live, since only the to-the-metal areas are in unsafe blocks, plus Rust gives you synchronization support to avoid race conditions. The drawback is compile time and missing the newest parts of the ecosystem. Asahi Linux’ Rust based Apple GPU driver has only 3% unsafe code so a lot less code can go wrong.
https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/…

Rust is FAST. Ruby is slow

By Somervillain • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

… has the full orchestra on it it seems. Reminds me of when every webdev was extolling the virtues of Ruby to whoever would listen. How often do you see any mention of it now?

Wtf is the point of Rust at the to-the-metal level when by definition most of what you do will be unsafe memory wise? Seems to me like some Rust shills have been evangelising to devs still at the age where they can’t differentiate marketing BS from fact.

WTAF Dude? Have you been so burnt by the past that you can’t see when the industry does something right for a change? Rust gives nearly indistinguishable performance from C with memory safety and nearly equal efficiency. Isn’t that what greybeards have been clamoring for since Java arrived (PSA: Java is nearly as fast as C for long running processes, like servers, but a HOG for RAM)? While I am too new at it to find rust intuitive or pleasant (I still understand C more), you can’t argue with the results.

Ruby was a massive failure because arrogant hipsters coupled a pretty good idea (rails) with a dogshit arrogant language that traded masturbatory elegance for performance and usefulness. You already know this, I wager.

Rust delivers. Now regarding nVidia? Well, I am not GPU driver dev, but I would wager that it’s not going to be manipulating memory registers. However, the nVidia driver download is nearly 1 GIGABYTE. I am sure a LOT of that code is not manipulating memory, but high-level functions that could benefit from Rust.

Re:Artificial Intelligence

By kertaamo • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

We have used LLM’s to generate a lot of Rust very successfully. I would rather trust AI generating Rust than almost any other language because the Rust compiler is so fussy about types and object lifetimes that it gives the LLM far less opportunity to sneaky silly, hard to find, errors in. Also Rust’s error messages are very comprehensive and helpful, which LLM’s make good use of.

Re:Trust?

By thegarbz • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Rust is often regarded as being “memory safe”, which it absolutely is not, since it has an “unsafe” keyword.

I think you may have just written the dumbest words ever put to text in a technical context (sorry but Slashdot politics still has your post beat). The whole point of memory safety is that you explicitly need to make a conscious decision to avoid it and do so in an auditable way.

Three Cities, 16 Years And $1 Billion Later, ‘Defiant’ Lucas Museum of Narrative Art Opens To Mixed Reviews

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
It looks like a spaceship hovering over South Los Angeles, writes CNN, with futuristic tube-like elevators and an exhibition of Banksy murals. There’s a room featuring Luke Skywalker’s X-34 Landspeeder, but in its gardens there’s a 19th-century cast of a sculpture showing David conquering Goliath — and then a bronze statue of Princess Leia strangling Jabba the Hutt with a chain. Next to Rosie the Riveter. CNN argues it’s the museum’s message that “all forms of art and mythology on display here — from comic book illustrations and ‘Star Wars’ concept art to Impressionist masterpieces and reproductions of the Sistine Chapel — are worthy of equal consideration within the long arc of human history.”
More than 16 years after first proposing a cultural institution dedicated to visual storytelling, filmmaker George Lucas and his wife, businesswoman Mellody Hobson, will open their long-awaited museum in Los Angeles on September 22. The project made two false starts — plans to construct it in San Francisco and Chicago were both eventually abandoned — and has cost Lucas around $1 billion of his own money to build… Inside, visitors will find a significant slice of Lucas’ private collection, amassed over five decades and spanning art, costumes, movie props and memorabilia, with more than 1,300 objects currently displayed across 30 galleries…

Many fans will come for the “Star Wars” vehicles and sculptures of Yoda and Grogu, but the sci-fi mega-franchise only occupies about 7% of the museum. Lucas and Hobson are betting those visitors will stay for artworks by Frida Kahlo and Norman Rockwell, photographs by Gordon Parks, comics by Frank Miller and Cowboy Bebop anime, which will be screened in one of two theaters alongside early silent movies, Lucas’ own student films and productions by famed historical artists like Man Ray… [M]ajor art institutions like New York’s Museum of Modern Art and London’s Tate Britain have reconsidered the cultural canon by rehanging their permanent collections, exhibiting overlooked or marginalized artists alongside more widely celebrated names. The Lucas Museum appears to follow a similar philosophy, contending that the gravitas of an artwork is not just determined by its display in space but by what it’s in dialogue with. Lucas has even called his namesake museum “a temple to the peoples’ art,” elevating the work of illustrators and other underappreciated art forms…

The museum defines narrative art as any art that tells a story, and, moving through the space, one feels the enormity of the task of organizing and presenting such a broad vision… The open-plan, curvilinear design means the galleries are not fully divided, reinforcing the all-encompassing nature of the collection, though altogether the vast array of exhibits sometimes struggle for cohesiveness. Disjointed curation may reflect turbulence in the museum’s management ahead of the opening. Last April, former director and CEO Sandra Jackson-Dumont departed, with Lucas himself assuming responsibility for “content direction.” A month later, the museum laid off 15 full-time and seven part-time staff before chief curator Pilar Tompkins Rivas resigned in December, with no replacement planned…

After failing to secure a site in San Francisco, Lucas faced public opposition and a lawsuit in Chicago, with nonprofit Friends of the Parks arguing that his lakefront proposal would essentially privatize public land. Amid the delays and setbacks, simply opening the museum may feel like a victory to its founders.
Lucas’s wife said she’d watched the awe-inspiring activity of genius at work, reports Variety. “And he was fanatical at times, but the thing about a fanatical person is they’re a fan. He was a deep fan of these illustrators in this work, and he wanted them to be represented, and I became a deeper fan of his.”
Hobson teared up as she continued, “I was a fan already, but I saw something, the inspiration, the unwillingness to compromise, the determination, the lack of sleep, the lack of rest, the doggedness that actually taught me so much more than I ever could have imagined.” The museum, which features 1,200 pieces from Lucas’s private collection, has been in the works for about 20 years… “I thought I was tough. I thought I was strong, I thought I had a will, and then I saw George, and I was like, ‘Oh, that’s why you could only do six of those movies,’" Hobson said. “Any more would have killed you.”
Artforum magazine notes the museum received “mixed reviews” before its September 22 opening:
The billion-dollar, 300,000-square-foot museum, which opens to the public on September 22, encompasses 100,000 square feet of gallery space housing the collection of Lucas and Hobson. Intended to highlight storytelling in art, it presents the work of comic book artists John Romita Sr. and R. Crumb, illustrators Maxfield Parrish and Norman Rockwell, and fantasy painters Boris Vallejo and Frank Frazetta alongside masterworks by Artemisia Gentileschi, Lucas Cranach the Elder, and Pieter Brueghel the Younger, as well as Mary Cassatt, Frida Kahlo, and John Singer Sargent. All the works on display were chosen for their ability to tell a story, frequently in a single frame, Hobson told members of the press on September 2…

“Some visitors may be scandalized by the collision of so-called ‘high’ and ‘low,’" wrote Min Chen in Artnet News. “But there’s something liberating about watching those hierarchies collapse, seeing the breadth of human creativity arrayed beyond the bounds of genre or canon.” Notably, most of the works appear without didactics, which is intentional. “We’re encouraging people to have their own individual encounters with works of art and take away what they feel like speaks to them,” Lucas told The Guardian.

The tactic did not land for everyone. “Without [didactics], I left the Lucas without a clear sense of how the museum is positioning itself or, frankly, without learning much about anything beyond what I already knew....” wrote Maximiliano Durón in Artnews. “The Museum of Narrative Art lacks any kind of narrative.” Mary McNamara of the Los Angeles Times was unfazed by the lack of information, calling the institution "gutsy” and “defiant.”

“Critics will roar,” wrote McNamara, “but the Lucas Museum is a win for ‘the people’s art.’"
Even the museum’s web site is a visual extravaganza (and impossible to scroll). Reportedly there’s two restaurants, including the rooftop Skywalker Grill, which offers offering everything from striped bass and ragu bolognese to lobster corn dogs and Skywalker ranch Waygu burgers.

Weird but kind of cool

By T34L • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
I gotta give to Lucas that while much of his work is of questionable qualities across many metrics they could be judged on, he still spends his energy and more importantly money on things that make him happy and attempt to bring something he finds cool and interesting into the world, instead of trying to usurp platforms to further his fave political agendas and stroke his ego, which cannot be said for many/most pepole of his status. Can’t say he’s my favourite creator, but at least he acts like a human being, rather than turning into a monstrous hollow husk chasing profit or worse, trying to make other people’s life worse actively like certain individuals that give many a slashdot commenter raging hardons.

Re:Weird but kind of cool

By Registered Coward v2 • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

I gotta give to Lucas that while much of his work is of questionable qualities across many metrics they could be judged on, he still spends his energy and more importantly money on things that make him happy and attempt to bring something he finds cool and interesting into the world, instead of trying to usurp platforms to further his fave political agendas and stroke his ego, which cannot be said for many/most pepole of his status. Can’t say he’s my favourite creator, but at least he acts like a human being, rather than turning into a monstrous hollow husk chasing profit or worse, trying to make other people’s life worse actively like certain individuals

I certainly agree, and find teh whole high and low art a bunch of BS. Some people like one thing and another a different thing, neither is better just different. The only thing the distinction is good for is for some pretentious critics to pontificate about things most people never read.

that give many a slashdot commenter raging hardons.

You saying /. is good for foreplay?

Re:architecture

By phantomfive • Score: 5, Funny Thread
Let’s be honest, there’s not much you could do architecturally to make Los Angeles uglier. Even a small nuke attack (tragedy though it is) would arguably add interest.

Re:Now I want to go

By TwistedGreen • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Is anyone surprised that someone named Maximiliano Durón wasn’t happy with the didactics of a Star Wars museum?

Re:Now I want to go

By sabbede • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Being “hilariously pretentious” is what the entire art world is built on, so it’s no surprise that the critics join in.

Why Google Told Drivers to Drive a Longer Way On Purpose

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“A team at Google’s research arm used Google Maps to reroute a small portion of drivers in 10 U.S. cities,” reports SFGate — including San Francisco and Los Angeles.

“Through their experiment, which was published in the journal Nature Cities in June, the researchers sought to evenly spread traffic down more corridors as the drivers head to similar destinations, in the hopes of reducing congestion.”
The experiments nudged up vehicle speeds by 2% on average on the congested roads, and shortened travel times by a modest 0.7%. Scientists have long thought that traffic could be eased this way, and this now demonstrates how it could actually work in the real world.

The researchers collected data on weekdays in the 10 cities, which included Seattle, Salt Lake City, Chicago and Atlanta. While they studied a variety of types of roads, from city streets to highways, they found that in cities such as Los Angeles where they targeted highways, their diversions had the biggest effect, with driving speeds in those areas increasing by about 4.6%. Most cities, though, saw a smaller improvement with speeds across them increasing by just 0.5% during peak times. The Google study’s findings confirm what other researchers have long suspected, said Michael Manville, a professor of urban planning at UCLA who was not involved in the study. “This is a pretty nice empirical illustration of a longstanding idea,” he said. If a clogged traffic artery is on the verge of a long delay, he said, rerouting a small number of vehicles away from the bottleneck produces a “not gigantic but noticeable result....”

As with other traffic interventions, there’s a risk that Google’s approach to spreading traffic could backfire. This concept, known as “induced demand,” also applies to efforts like adding a lane to a critical highway, which temporarily relieves congestion, until traffic rises again. “You can do this, but you cannot be too successful, because if you are too successful, then more people will start driving, and essentially you’ll be back to ground zero,” [said Alexandre Bayen, a co-author of the study and director of UC Berkeley’s Center for Information Technology Research in the Interest of Society]. “That’s why when we did the study, we only operated at the margin.” The idea is to make minor improvements, enough to matter in the aggregate but not so significant that people notice and start driving more, canceling those improvements…

The Google Research study also considered the potential environmental benefits of its traffic improvements. The paper highlights the carbon dioxide emission reductions resulting from the slightly smoother traffic flow and shortened travel times, which add up to a savings of about 1,000 metric tons annually. That’s equivalent to the emissions of about 200 vehicles, a drop in the bucket for cities with millions of cars, the majority of which are still gas guzzlers, even in San Francisco and LA. Bayen acknowledges that while emphasizing the cumulative benefit if such efforts were sustained for a longer time. For Manville, the study is a useful proof of concept. “It is a demonstration that if we managed roads better, air would probably be cleaner,” he said.
According to the article, “Google’s study might not just be a one-off, and city officials could decide to make use of the Google research findings, Bayen said, such as by trying to improve traffic congestion on a larger scale…”

“Google declined SFGATE’s requests for comment on whether the company informed city authorities or rerouted drivers about the study,” the article points out.

Experiencing this firsthand

By fjo3 • Score: 5, Informative Thread
Had this happen three times in the last month or two in Northern California. As long as I follow the new route strictly, I usually get there at about the same time I would have otherwise, but with a brand new view of the cityscape / rural landscape. Went for a nice river drive last week, 10/10 so far.

Re:Induced demand is BS

By serviscope_minor • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Induced demand is BS […]Traffic engineers are fucking assholes, every last one of them.

You can’t wish away reality jut because you don’t like it.

We should have double-decker freeways and people zipping along from wherever they want to be.

How much more tax are you prepared to pay to support that?

Re:Induced demand

By thegarbz • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I think you fundamentally misunderstand the point. The point of induced demand is that it can’t solve traffic congestion, it can only further intrench car dependency. It’s counter-intuitive to its own goal, as you said the point is to get people where they want to get to, and the best way of doing that is to provide them with a method of doing so that doesn’t waste their lives.

Induced demand is a concept unique to overcrowded individual mobility sources, specifically driving. On the flip side you can do something like invest in high-speed rail or better more efficient public transit and move more people, more quickly, without it just turning into a parking lot, which at the same time reduces demand on an arterial.

This isn’t a question of expand highway vs do nothing. It’s a question of expanding highway vs doing something different that may have a better outcome (for both people who will use the system as well existing people on the highway who won’t).

Rather than telling people to fuck off, please understand what it means in the context of city planning.

But if that’s your aim, at least be honest about it.

City planning is fundamentally about controlling habits of people. It’s at the very core. You don’t drive because you want to drive. You drive because planners and designers have ultimately created an environment which made it either the best or maybe the only option for you. This kind of thing doesn’t need to be stated.

Re:Induced demand

By 2TecTom • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

car dependency is baked into large tract single use developments, fix the corrupt development process and then maybe you can reduse the need for travel in the first place

people don’t just decide to drive around for little reason

Rude

By BytePusher • Score: 4, Informative Thread
While this does utilize existing roads, this terrorizes neighborhoods. Quiet streets where children play become highways. Cities avoid improving infrastructure, like public transportation, for longer. People will buy additional cars instead of using public transportation. Overall, while this is a technocratic dream, it abuses the public in unintentional ways while sounding very smart.

Does Brave Browser Load Faster Than Chrome, Firefox, and Microsoft Edge?

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
The Brave web browser published a new round of benchmarks claiming its desktop browser uses less system resources than Chrome, Microsoft Edge, and Firefox — and also loads pages faster. The blog Linuxiac reports:
According to Brave’s testing, the browser used 44% less CPU, 28% less memory, and 10% less energy on average compared with the three competing browsers. It also completed page loads 20% faster while transferring 26% less inbound data and 39% less outbound data…

- Brave averaged about 33% CPU usage, while Chrome used 47%, Edge 53%, and Firefox 78%.

- For memory, Brave used about 1.2 GB, compared to 1.75 GB for Chrome, 1.62 GB for Edge, and 1.65 GB for Firefox.

By stopping ads, analytics scripts, tracking pixels, and other third-party requests from loading, the browser has less network traffic and less work to do. In page-loading tests, Brave took about 4.4 seconds to fully load a page. Chrome took 5.1 seconds, Firefox 5.3 seconds, and Edge 6 seconds. However, when measuring Largest Contentful Paint, which is when the main content appears, Brave and Chrome both averaged about 2.4 seconds, with Edge and Firefox just behind at 2.5 seconds. This means Brave’s main advantage comes after the main content is visible, since there are fewer background ads, trackers, analytics requests, and delayed scripts to process.

Who cares

By gweihir • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

It is fast enough. The thing that counts is that Brave has very good ad-blocking and that is far more important.

Who cares?

By topham • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

I opened my browser 3 months ago.

Seems suspect at best

By thecombatwombat • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

I just never trust benchmarks at this point. They always seem to be lies.

They are using an almost year old version of Firefox, and testing on a Mac. I wonder why that could be?

Conveniently, somehow, they chose a version just before Firefox enabled a bunch of GPU acceleration on the M series Macs . . .

If they’d just left it at “here’s how much data you save when having an ad blocker on by default” they’d have a find point. But beyond that the comparison seems really, really deceptive.

Re:bullshit

By outsider007 • Score: 5, Informative Thread

You can opt out of all of it in settings + change the start page

Re:Who cares

By AmiMoJo • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Brave is scummy though. They messed with affiliate links to steal revenue, and took tips for people who were not part of their tips programme. They can’t be trusted.

They have also decided to remove Manifest V2 support, so no more uBlock Origin. In fact, Firefox is now the only major browser that still supports it. uBlock Lite isn’t ideal.

I’d like to switch to a Chromium based browser because Firefox continues to have issues, none of them appear to have first rate ad blocking on both desktop and Android, along with sync for history/tabs and passwords.

Also note that in this test they used an old version of Firefox. Performance has improved lately, although not to Chrome levels.

Switzerland’s Federal Government Tests Open-Source Alternatives to Microsoft on 3,000 Computers

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot
Switzerland has a population of 9,154,242. And its federal government just launched a pilot program to test open source alternatives to Microsoft 365 on 3,000 workstations, reports the blog It’s FOSS. “That’s about 7% of the federal workforce.”
The target is to complete the migration by end of 2027… On September 3, 2026, the Federal Council published results of “PoC BOSS”, a feasibility proof-of-concept involving 172 federal employees who tested the openDesk suite, a German open-source collaboration platform. During the proof-of-concept phase, core office tasks like document processing and email received positive assessments, while large-scale video conferencing still showed technical limitations. Based on the ‘success’ of the PoC phase with 172 employees, the pilot is now launched for 3,000 employees…

According to Matthias Stürmer, professor at the Bern University of Applied Sciences, Microsoft’s supremacy in public institutions poses three problems that are driving this migration. First is the risk of foreign access. US cloud legislation could expose Swiss government data to foreign authorities. Second is the risk to service continuity, as dependency on a single foreign vendor creates operational risk. The third risk is the escalating costs as proprietary licensing fees are rising with no Swiss leverage.

Switzerland’s military cybersecurity unit, Cyber Command, is not waiting for the civilian pilot. It is already poised to replace Microsoft 365 entirely with openDesk by October 2026. It is pretty much the same reason. Military doesn’t want foreign governments accessing sensitive Swiss data.
The article notes that during the pilot phase, the new system runs in parallel with Microsoft 365 rather than replacing it. But the article’s author speculates that “If the pilot is successful, we might expect the migration to continue on all the 54,000 workstations owned by the federal administrations.”

National security

By dskoll • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Relying on proprietary USA software or services is a national security risk for all non-USA countries. So good for Switzerland.

I wish my country (Canada) would start taking digital sovereignty seriously, but our government is so far down the MSFT rabbit-hole that I don’t hold out much hope we’ll ever disentangle ourselves until the USA does something draconian and then we’re really screwed.

The US better look into this too

By RitchCraft • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Microsoft is only looking out for Microsoft. Heck, just a few months ago we found out that Microsoft was using “proxy techs” in China for DoD tech support. ALL governments need to rethink how deeply they want Microsoft, or any other closed source tech company, within their ranks.

Re: We actually looked at it

By MeNeXT • Score: 5, Informative Thread

You are right in your statement but you don’t manage 1,500 Linux/Unix stations like Windows that’s why it was so expensive. There are tools for free to even manage a greater number of stations.

When you lock yourself in a proprietary system and tools then you are right that they don’t work on other systems. It’s not Linux that is restricting your use.

My kids grew up using systems no employer used. They grew up computer literate and today they have no issues using any computer even the ones employers use.

Re: We actually looked at it

By gweihir • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Exactly. On Linux you can automatize system administration very well with FOSS. Yes, you have to use different tools, but, for example, SSH-ing into a box with certificate-based authentication when it is up is trivial. Scripting that way is trivial. Even a doing a full installation (on top of a minimal one) this way is trivial. Doing updates this way is trivial. All with the security mind-set that UNIX was designed with from the start.

Now, if you want the same admin interface on Linux as you had on Windows, of course you are paying for that. But you are doing it wrong. There is a reason you need a lot fewer sysadmins on UNIX (and Linux) than on Windows and that reason is that once the sysadmin has automatized everything, very little breaks. Quite unlike Windows.

Of course, the other part of this is that UNIX sysadmins are quite a bit more expensive than Windows ones, because the expectations are a lot higher. But you still come out ahead by a lot.

Re:Reliability

By gweihir • Score: 5, Informative Thread

To be fair, he is really good at breaking and messing up things. Seems almost like a super-power.