Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Marvel and DC Announce First Comic Crossover in 22 Years with Deadpool-Batman Pairing
  2. ‘AI Role in College Brings Education Closer To a Crisis Point’
  3. CISA Loses Nearly All Top Officials
  4. GLP-1 Drug Use Surges 600% as 2% of Americans Take Weight-Loss Medications
  5. Cancer-Fighting Immune Cells Could Soon Be Engineered Inside Our Bodies
  6. Adidas Warns of Data Breach After Customer Service Provider Hack
  7. Everybody’s Mad About Uno
  8. Browser Company Abandons Arc for AI-Powered Successor
  9. 25% iPhone Tariff Insufficient To Drive US Production Shift, Morgan Stanley Says
  10. What Do People Want?
  11. Europe Warns Giant E-tailer To Stop Cheating Consumers or Face Its Wrath
  12. Immigration Is the Only Thing Propping Up California’s Population
  13. Nikon To Raise Camera Prices in the US Because of Tariffs
  14. Remembering John Young, Co-founder of Web Archive Cryptome
  15. The CIA Secretly Ran a Star Wars Fan Site

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Marvel and DC Announce First Comic Crossover in 22 Years with Deadpool-Batman Pairing

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
Marvel Entertainment and DC Comics have announced their first crossover event since 2003’s JLA/Avengers, featuring Deadpool and Batman in dual one-shot publications launching later this year. Deadpool/Batman one-shot launches September 17 and follows Wade Wilson hired for a Gotham City job that puts him against Batman.

DC’s Batman/Deadpool counterpart launches in November. Both publications will include additional “backup adventures” featuring other character matchups, though creative teams for those remain unannounced. The crossover required extensive coordination between the companies’ editorial schedules, which typically plan two to three years in advance.

‘AI Role in College Brings Education Closer To a Crisis Point’

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
Bloomberg’s editorial board warned Tuesday that AI has created an “untenable situation” in higher education where students routinely outsource homework to chatbots while professors struggle to distinguish computer-generated work from human writing. The editorial described a cycle where assignments that once required days of research can now be completed in minutes through AI prompts, leaving students who still do their own work looking inferior to peers who rely on technology.

The board said that professors have begun using AI tools themselves to evaluate student assignments, creating what it called a scenario of “computers grading papers written by computers, students and professors idly observing, and parents paying tens of thousands of dollars a year for the privilege.”

The editorial argued that widespread AI use in coursework undermines the broader educational mission of developing critical thinking skills and character formation, particularly in humanities subjects. Bloomberg’s board recommended that colleges establish clearer policies on acceptable AI use, increase in-class assessments including oral exams, and implement stronger honor codes with defined consequences for violations.

Wouldn’t mind if people learn from it

By jfdavis668 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
But they aren’t. They use AI instead of learning. People can’t state a problem, describe the issue, and recommend a solution. Also can’t explain two sides of an issue and compare them. Now, a lot of people couldn’t do this before AI came along, but you learn from trying. Now people can just input the question and hand in the answer, with no thought process involved.

Don’t grade homework. Test critical thinking.

By Talondel • Score: 3 Thread
Homework assignments, and frankly any work done outside of a controlled environment, should serve only to prepare people for the work that will be done on an exam in a controlled environment. If students want to use AI to complete those assignments they are free to do so. But it likely won’t do a good job of preparing them to do the work on an exam. Multiple choice exams and short form writing assignments under controlled conditions (i.e. no electronics, or laptops locked out of anything other than exam writing software) are well suited to assess factual knowledge and the ability to apply those facts to novel circumstances. The problem here isn’t that people don’t know how to create an assessment that can’t be completed by an AI. The problem is that they are unwilling to do so. They are locked into a mindset where take home assignments and projects count for large parts of the grade or where they aren’t willing to lock people into a controlled environment for testing. Partly because they can’t envision a better way and partly because they’re too lazy to do so. The underlying problem is that there’s a fundamental disconnect between why people really attend college or post graduate programs and why the people teaching them think they do. People are not there to learn. They are there to get a certificate that says they’ve learned. Preferably while doing the least amount of actual learning possible. The real value of a degree is not what you learn to get the degree. It’s the degree itself. If universities and professors think that it’s more important that the people they are purporting to educate are actually educated there are fairly simple ways to accomplish that. But they have to recognize that their students (and a large share of professors) are not going to quietly adapt to that new paradigm without objection. It will be difficult and messy and may require them to ask students to ‘unlearn’ everything they did to be ‘successful’ in academics up to that point.

Once again homework is basically useless

By rsilvergun • Score: 3 Thread
You can Google to studies but every indication is that homework is not a valuable tool for education. It is an excellent tool for sorting people into groups that can and cannot have access to food, shelter and medicine but if you actually want to teach people class time is what works.

We use homework to decide who gets to have the good jobs and the good lives and who doesn’t. That’s because we don’t have enough highly profitable work to go around anymore. There is plenty of useful things for society people could be doing but they’re not profitable enough for corporations to be bothered with and if it’s not profitable for a corporation then we don’t want to do it.

Remember our compulsory education system was originally designed to get Farm workers used to factory work and the idea of endlessly working instead of doing the work you needed to do for the harvest and then stopping because you’ve done your work that day and there wasn’t anything more to do. We had a major problem we Farm workers would wander off the assembly lines because they didn’t understand the concept of never stopping work. Schools and their bells were designed to condition them to living like that.

We have basically been taking that process and extending it for the last couple of hundred years.

Simple Solution: Just Require In-Person Exams

By nealric • Score: 3 Thread

There’s a very easy solution to this AI problem: grades can just be based on in-person exams that are either administered on paper or a closed software environment that prohibits AI usage.

If the class demands a formal paper, it shouldn’t ever just be a cold “turn it in” situation. Something like a thesis should be developed with in-person discussions about the state of the research and the student’s progress. Those discussions should be touchpoints for evaluating whether the student is understanding the material and really thinking through. That means that such papers only really work in a small seminar environment.

What is obsolete is the sort of class where students are asked to write a 10-page discussion of a given topic and then the professor just grades that paper cold. I doubt we are ever going to be able to adequately police whether that 10-page analysis of Kantian ethics was written with AI assistance. Likewise, STEM classes with problem sets should only use those problem sets for learning and not for evaluation. If the student wants to use AI on the problem sets they can, but they won’t be able to use AI to help them on the exam.

CISA Loses Nearly All Top Officials

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
Multiple readers shared the following report about the executive departures at CISA:
Virtually all of the top officials at the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) have departed the agency or will do so this month, according to an email obtained by Cybersecurity Dive, further widening a growing void in expertise and leadership at the government’s lead cyber defense force at a time when tensions with foreign adversaries are escalating.

Five of CISA’s six operational divisions and six of its 10 regional offices will have lost top leaders by the end of the month, the agency’s new deputy director, Madhu Gottumukkala, informed employees in an email on Thursday. […] The exits of these leaders could undermine the efficiency and strategic clarity of CISA’s partnerships with critical infrastructure operators, private security firms, foreign allies, state governments and local emergency managers, experts say.

Meanwhile

By ArchieBunker • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Old penny pincher cheeto is spending tens of millions on a birthday parade.

Outsourcing

By ZombieCatInABox • Score: 5, Funny Thread

All US cybersecurity tasks have now been outsourced to the KGB.

That’s what all those root accounts that all governement organizations were forced to create by DOGE are for.

Re:Meanwhile

By hey! • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

I don’t think he has any idea what CISA has, but there evidently is some hostility from people around him due to CISA’s efforts to educate people on online disinformation, and its failure to back up claims of election interference in 2020.

You have to wonder…

By Tschaine • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

If Donald Trump was actually a Russian asset, what would he do differently?

Is there anything?

Crippling our cybersecurity organization, antagonizing our allies, cutting off support for a democracy that’s being invaded by a tyrant, pardoning people who lied about their contact with said tyrant’s government…

Surprised? I’m not surprised.

By AlanObject • Score: 3 Thread

Does anyone recall this is the government agency that refused to declare that fraud had any role in deciding the 2020 election?

In fact, asserted the opposite of that.

And now Trump is in control again. What would you expect?

GLP-1 Drug Use Surges 600% as 2% of Americans Take Weight-Loss Medications

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader shares a report:
More than 2% of Americans are taking the blockbuster class of GLP-1 drugs for overweight or obesity, up nearly 600% over six years, according to a report from FAIR Health given to Axios first. The data from FAIR Health’s repository of over 51 billion commercial healthcare claim records shows the explosion in use of the drugs specifically for weight loss — roughly half of all users.

In all, roughly 4% of Americans were taking GLP-1 drugs in 2024 for either overweight, obesity or Type 2 diabetes (their original approved use). The data shows Novo Nordisk’s Ozempic is still by far the most commonly taken GLP-1, followed by Eli Lilly’s Mounjaro. The percentage of adults who were prescribed a GLP-1 drug but did not have bariatric surgery increased from 2.5% in 2019 to 11.2% in 2024 while the the percentage of adult patients who had bariatric surgery decreased 41.8%.

Re:Pills Won’t Stop Your Sin

By jacks smirking reven • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

I agree, the policy of shame has done wonder for the obesity problem.

Every problem can be solved that simply also, you just tell people what do to and they go and do it. Never fails. My buddy was playing a game the other night and struggling so I told him “hey, don’t play bad, play good instead” and that’s all it took.

Lost 110 on It - Miracle Drug

By TheWho79 • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
As someone who’s been active and over weight for 30 years, this is a miracle drug. I tried everything from running marathons for five years (put on weight doing it), to working out and nothing helped. I’d loose 20lbs, and put on 30 - lose 30, and put on 40. I estimate I’ve lost over 250lbs over the last 30 years - unfortunately, I’d gained 350. Meanwhile, lost 110lbs in 2023 on mounjaro.

Re:I Hope That There Are No Delayed Ill Effects

By TheWho79 • Score: 4, Informative Thread
The side effects are tolerable (occasional upset stomach and constipation - and a few report increased hair loss).

The benefits go beyond weight loss:

Re:put it in the water

By snowshovelboy • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Unfortunately, this theory is easily debunked by the fact that India ranks 3rd in the world for obesity rate, while maintaining one of the worlds highest rates of vegetarianism.

Re:“If tastes good, spit it out.” - LaLanne

By Moridineas • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

I’m not arguing against exercise, but with GLP-1 drugs, you literally do not need to exercise to lose weight.

In my late 20s, I lost about 60 lbs of weight, almost entirely through a small number of dietary changes—zero beverages other than water and unsweetened coffee, zero french fries, zero bagged snack foods, zero going out to eat for lunch. I also practiced intermittent fasting, sporadically, for 24 hours. I didn’t change my exercising at all.

Now, since I lost the weight, I’ve taken up more exercise (bike, jog, lift) and I’ve maintained a steady weight for almost 15 years now.

Bodybuilders say “abs are made in the kitchen, not the gym.” They’ve got a point.

Cancer-Fighting Immune Cells Could Soon Be Engineered Inside Our Bodies

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
Researchers are developing techniques to genetically modify cancer-fighting immune cells directly inside patients rather than in expensive laboratory facilities, potentially making CAR-T therapy accessible to far more people.

Current CAR-T treatments require removing a patient’s T cells, shipping them to specialized facilities for genetic engineering, then returning them weeks later at costs around $500,000 per dose. The new “in vivo” approaches use viral vectors or RNA-loaded nanoparticles to deliver genetic instructions directly to T cells circulating in the bloodstream, which could reduce costs by an order of magnitude. Companies including Capstan Therapeutics, co-founded by Nobel laureates, and AstraZeneca-backed EsoBiotec have launched early human trials. While only about 200 US centers currently offer traditional CAR-T therapy, the approach could make the powerful treatment available on demand like conventional drugs.

This is what UScCancer funding looks like

By jacks smirking reven • Score: 3 Thread

Or used to look like, when people ask “we spend so much money on cancer” it’s on base level research like this usually working with hospitals and universities, the CAR-T therapy this expands upon has been funded by NIH and NCI, this is the research that enables pharma companies to develop and trial actual treatments.

Now if you want to say if we fund all this we should own more and have better access to it I would agree but fact is the US leads on a lot of this because we fund it and that leads to a lot of economic growth for everyone and American’s do tend to have access before most other people do (just at an extremely high cost sometimes but that is a related but different problem)

Federal grant helps fund CAR T-cell therapy trial for B-cell malignancies

NIH researchers develop approach that could help supercharge T-cell therapies against solid tumors

Memorial Sloan Kettering Awarded Prestigious NCI Grant to Further Advance CAR T Cell Treatments for Solid Tumors

Marker Therapeutics to receive non-dilutive funding from NIH Small Business Innovation Research Program based on preliminary clinical results and non-clinical data in lymphoma

Adidas Warns of Data Breach After Customer Service Provider Hack

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
German sportswear giant Adidas disclosed a data breach after attackers hacked a customer service provider and stole some customers’ data. From a report:
“adidas recently became aware that an unauthorized external party obtained certain consumer data through a third-party customer service provider,” the company said. “We immediately took steps to contain the incident and launched a comprehensive investigation, collaborating with leading information security experts.”

Adidas added that the stolen information did not include the affected customers’ payment-related information or passwords, as the threat actors behind the breach only gained access to contact. The company has also notified the relevant authorities regarding this security incident and will alert those affected by the data breach.

Everybody’s Mad About Uno

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
More than 50 years after its debut, Uno has achieved unprecedented popularity among adults, but its resurgence is creating problems and confusions as players disagree on fundamental rules. WSJ, in a fun story [non-paywalled source]:
Think politics divides? Try mixing competitors with different views on stacking “action” cards, or getting everyone to agree on the true power of the Wild card. And nobody can seem to decide whether staples of the game of their youth — like mandating players yell “Uno!” when they have one card left — are socially acceptable at a bar with strangers.
Mattel has responded by actively settling rule debates on social media, definitively stating that stacking Draw 2 cards is prohibited, while simultaneously embracing the game’s divisive nature through marketing campaigns. The company’s “Show ‘Em No Mercy” variant, featuring more aggressive rules, became the second-best-selling card game in the United States last year according to research firm Circana, trailing only classic Uno itself.

We Don’t Talk About Crazy Eights

By Pseudonymous Powers • Score: 3 Thread
If a game doesn’t have hit points, I might as well be pushing a hoop down the street with a stick.

The internet is an environment and…

By PubJeezy • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
The internet is an environment and native advertising is pollution.

I couldn’t care less …

By Qbertino • Score: 3 Thread

… about Uno.

Even though I did get into Board/Tablegaming 18 months ago and attend the local boardgame meetup once or twice a week.

Right now I’m regularly playing Scythe (with extensions) and Roll for the Galaxy (with extensions).

And I’ve got a stack of other premium boardgames waiting to be played intensely.
All of them waaaaay more interesting than Uno.

Re:WTF is Uno?

By RobinH • Score: 5, Informative Thread
It’s a commercial version of the classic card game Crazy Eights, and this is just a viral marketing scheme.

Browser Company Abandons Arc for AI-Powered Successor

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
The Browser Company has ceased the active development of its Arc browser to focus on Dia, a new AI-powered browser currently in alpha testing, the company said Tuesday. In a lengthy letter to users, CEO Josh Miller said the startup should have stopped working on Arc “a year earlier,” noting data showing the browser suffered from a “novelty tax” problem where users found it too different to adopt widely.

Arc struggled with low feature adoption — only 5.52% of daily active users regularly used multiple Spaces, while 4.17% used Live Folders. The company will continue maintenance updates for Arc but won’t add new features. Arc also won’t open-source the browser because it relies on proprietary infrastructure called ADK (Arc Development Kit) that remains core to the company’s value.

Dia is a diagram editor

By ZiggyZiggyZig • Score: 3 Thread

Well, that’s going to going to cause some confusion. At least for me - I am developing some software that works around Dia (the diagram editor), and now I’ll have to explain to my customers that it’s not using Dia (the AI browser thing).

Alpha Geeks

By bill_mcgonigle • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Tim O’Reilly had a good essay, "Alpha Geeks" that describes how new tech gets adopted.

Arc seemed interesting but how many Alpha Geeks will run a closed-source browser in this decade where vulnerabilities are everywhere and of potentially existential risk?

They’re in a tough spot selling a proprietary browser in a world where they have to depend on uptake first by the people who don’t care if it’s open source or not.

Brave seems to have found a business model that lets them do both. It’s not obvious that the proprietary business model is viable for Internet browsing, but marketing can take up a lot of that slack.

Certainly Safari maintains an important market share so it’s not completely off the table but those users need to be sold to if the Alpha Geeks aren’t interested. I’m not sure if Edge has separate CVE’s from Chromium but in both cases vendor-bundling is the supermajority of user acquisition which is quite difficult to compete with.

Sprinkling on a bit of AI seems like the go-to strategy this year - heck maybe it’ll work at some point. It’s not impossible that somebody will invent a killer-app desktop AI integration. An agent dashboard might be useful when the reliability moves a few more sigmas out.

The novelty tax is a real killer

By flibbidyfloo • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

I tried ARC and thought it was pretty cool - but boy I’m just too busy to learn a new browser. I probably also am not the target market, since I mostly use a browser to, um, browse the web, and dedicated apps for 75% of my productivity work.

Sometimes “good enough” is too hard to replace.

25% iPhone Tariff Insufficient To Drive US Production Shift, Morgan Stanley Says

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
President Trump’s threat of a 25% tariff on smartphone imports including iPhones would not provide enough economic incentive for Apple to relocate US-bound iPhone production to domestic facilities, according to a new Morgan Stanley note viewed by Slashdot. The tariff threat, announced Friday via social media, appeared to target Apple’s recent shift of iPhone production from China to India through its contract manufacturing partners.

Morgan Stanley analysts estimate that establishing US iPhone production would require a minimum of two years and several billion dollars to build multiple greenfield assembly facilities, with a trained workforce exceeding 100,000 workers during peak seasons. More significantly, the firm calculates that a US-produced iPhone would cost 35% more than current China or India production, primarily due to higher labor costs and the need to import 25% of iPhone components from China under existing 30% tariffs. By contrast, Apple could offset a 25% import tariff by raising global iPhone prices just 4-6%, making domestic production economically unviable.

35% seems like an underestimate

By shilly • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I’m sure the analyst teams have been up late several nights running the numbers and kicking the tyres on their 35% estimate of the price increase needed to make iPhones in the US vs China, but it seems like a wild underestimate to me, mainly because you don’t have the integrated supply chains and workforce skills in the US, and neither of those problems is readily addressable by Apple alone.

But in any event, none of this ought to distract from the most important point: the president is seeking to supplant the decisions of the CEO of one particular business, and most media reporting is treating this as just another part of the tariff story, instead of highlighting that this is another major ratchet in Trump’s arrogation of unchecked whimsical power.

The plan

By RobinH • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
The plan is this: cause a crisis, let everyone freak out, extract a (tiny) concession, declare the crisis resolved, declare yourself a hero, rinse and repeat. Meanwhile nobody with any money to invest will dare invest it in the US.

WTF

By Anonymous Coward • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

By contrast, Apple could offset a 25% import tariff by raising global iPhone prices just 4-6%

WTF?
Why should the rest of the world pay for Trumps incompetence?
Americans voted for him, let them pay for their mistake.

Re:The plan

By hdyoung • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Actually, the analysis I’ve read is that businesses and wall street concluded long ago that Trump is 100% hot air, made-for-social-media. Your description of his strategy is spot on, and the smart money has already figured it out. In reality, tariffs are up like 5-10 percent, and businesses are quietly passing every single penny of the extra cost on to the consumers. Business and investment are gonna mostly happen as usual.

On the other hand, main street is getting lightly hammered. Prices are up 5-10% because of tariffs, which is enough to downshift the economy a bit and make life a tad less comfortable. 33% of the average Joes watch Fox, and 33% watch NBC, and both of those outlets portray the world as being on fire from pole-to-pole, because that’s what drives viewership and sells ads. So, most consumers and retails investors basically bipolar nowadays, which causes all sorts of whiplash.

But, life largely goes on. Trump will finish out his 4 years. Looking back, we will realize that he accomplished and changed surprisingly little.

Re:Sounds like

By jacks smirking reven • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

1. How can we say this without addressing income inequality?
2. Republicans and Americans don’t give a shit about the deficit, we can stop pretending like this matters, the current bill is set to spend more debt.
3. This is a concern but fucking with our allies I would suggest isn’t going to help. I suppose we will see who’s plan comes out better, Biden’s 3 large investment bills (CHIPS, BP Infrastructure, IRA) work better than whatever the current strategy is.
4. IF UE in the US was high then maybe this is a top concern but it’s historically low. Also whoever says anything about cultural preservation or national indentity needs to define what they are in the USA, not just say it and expect the reader to do the work. To me the most important aspects of that are our Constitutional system of rules and order which is currently being run roughshod so to me as an American Trump is actively destroying our identity.
5. See #4.

What Do People Want?

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
Abstract of a paper on NBER:
We elicited over a million stated preference choices over 126 dimensions or “aspects” of well-being from a sample of 3,358 respondents on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk (MTurk). Our surveys also collected self-reported well-being (SWB) questions about respondents’ current levels of the aspects of well-being. From the stated preference data, we estimate relative log marginal utilities per point on our 0-100 response scale for each aspect. We validate these estimates by comparing them to alternative methods for estimating preferences. Our findings provide empirical evidence that both complements and challenges philosophical perspectives on human desires and values. Our results support Aristotelian notions of eudaimonia through family relationships and Maslow’s emphasis on basic security needs, yet also suggest that contemporary theories of well-being may overemphasize abstract concepts such as happiness and life satisfaction, while undervaluing concrete aspects such as family well-being, financial security, and health, that respondents place the highest marginal utilities on. We document substantial heterogeneity in preferences across respondents within (but not between) demographic groups, with current SWB levels explaining a significant portion of the variation.

“may overemphasize abstract concepts”

By Tailhook • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Academic euphemory for: The shit we peddle doesn’t mean anything to anyone.

Answers why so many are unhappy…

By SlashTex • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
If you look at the top dozen or so reasons cited for increasing marginal happiness, all but 2 go back to children and family. Decreasing human interaction, the drop in birth rates, cyber-loneliness, the bombarding of social media, increasing friction between what men look for in women and what women look for in men… (last not meant to exclude same sex, btw)

Being part of a family is so important, but fewer are obtaining it.

Re:full stomach, sex, good weather

By MacMann • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Yep. What people want can be described by Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, which was first published decades ago.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…

For an older example of a list of what people want we can look to the Christian bible with their description of the works of mercy, this dates back centuries.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…

The paper referenced looks to be quite long and unless there’s someone that can point to something profound and new in there I’m not likely to read it all. The Maslow’s hierarchy of needs compares well with Christian tradition so it’s not like there’s any deep mystery here or something changed in any fundamental way. If I were to dig further into history and other cultures I’d expect to find a similar list of needs, and in much the same order.

The fine summary appears to indicate they found some nuance on how people from differing demographics rate these needs. That likely holds some value for people that study human behavior but does such nuance mean anything in how we should act in society or set government policy? I have my doubts, especially if this means setting different policies based on race or gender as that could raise all kinds of questions on equality under the law.

Am I confused or are they confused?

By fuzzyfuzzyfungus • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
I realize that, after the nature of economists, the constructed a proxy ‘unit’ to compare marginal utilities with; but I missed the part where they determined that the various things that they were comparing marginal utilities for were actually distinct.

A statement like “suggest that contemporary theories of well-being may overemphasize abstract concepts such as happiness and life satisfaction, while undervaluing concrete aspects such as family well-being, financial security, and health,” would make sense if each of those is a distinct commodity and we are just learning whether people prefer cars, watches, or ipads; but if they are not it becomes sort of nonsensical. If I’m stressed and unhappy because I’m financially underwater and dread each day’s pile of bills am I saying that I value ‘financial security’ because I don’t value ‘happiness’; or precisely because I do value happiness and financial insecurity is the immediately obvious barrier to happiness?

Is there something clever they’ve done that solves the problem that I’m just being dense about; or is there just an implicit assumption that all the variables being compared are independent; when some could actually be dependent(even to the extent of being synonymous)?

Again, I am open to the possibility that I’m just not understanding the clever move; but this sounds like someone saying “We’ve determined that, contrary to popular belief, ‘flour’, ‘milk’, ‘butter’, and ‘chocolate chips’ may be more heavily valued than ‘the taste of cookies’" with some formal-sounding stuff about marginal utility to distract them from the fact that it sounds like people are saying they want to make some cookies, potentially because they like the taste.

Amazon Mturk is not representative

By nategasser • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Amazon Mechanical Turk pays about $2/hour for your time. People who spend time answering questions and doing tasks on MTurk are hardly a representative sample of humankind.

Europe Warns Giant E-tailer To Stop Cheating Consumers or Face Its Wrath

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
The European Commission warned Chinese e-tailer SHEIN on Monday that it must address multiple consumer law violations or face fines across EU member states. Regulators found SHEIN’s website displayed fake discounts not based on actual prior prices, used pressure-selling tactics with false purchase deadlines, provided misleading information about consumer return rights, made deceptive sustainability claims, and hid contact details from customers. SHEIN has one month to respond to the findings and propose corrective measures, adding regulatory pressure to a company already facing US tariff challenges despite generating an estimated $38 billion in revenue last year.

Re:But what else is Shein for-

By Freischutz • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

-if not lies about cheap sheit?

I know what Shein, Temu and AliExpress are like and I just got used to it because I know that these sales tactics are pretty normal in parts of Asia. Having said that I’d still rather buy this ‘cheap sheit’ directly from Shein, Temu and AliExpress rather than ‘entrepreneurs’ in the West who add a 1-500% markup on the exact same ‘cheap sheit’ which they buy directly from Chinese factories for even less than Shein, Temu and AliExpress charge. Some of the more brazen Western resellers just source their stuff from the Shein, Temu and AliExpress web sites from the comfort of their home office, sell it to you at a huge markup and don’t even bother to take the item out of the Chinese packaging before forwarding it to you. A lot of western retail these days is basically just an obscenely overpriced personal shopping service so why not just buy from as close to the source as possible and cut out these parasites? Finally, a lot of this ‘cheap sheit’ actually isn’t ‘sheit’. The quality of most of the stuff I get from Shein, Temu and AliExpress is actually quite decent.

Re:User experience

By Kokuyo • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Like buying brand labels protects you from cheap garbage.

Not the only way the EU is hitting back

By gaiageek • Score: 3 Thread
EU plans €2 fee on small parcels in hit to Shein and Temu

Dropshipping

By DrYak • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Some of the more brazen Western resellers just source their stuff from the Shein, Temu and AliExpress web sites from the comfort of their home office, sell it to you at a huge markup and don’t even bother to take the item out of the Chinese packaging before forwarding it to you.

Dropshipping doesn’t involve forwarding parcels.
The parcel never went through the reseller’s hand.
It went straight from the Chinese dispatcher to the buyer.

The western reseller is merely a customized front-end shop.

At best, the Chinese themselves could relying on a parcel forwarding service that can split or joins shipment for various taxation reasons.
(e.g.: stuff bought from AliExpress often transits through the Netherlands here in Europe).

Re:Delhaze/Ahold always overcharges customers

By dbu • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Overpricing isn’t illegal, deception is. Shein isn’t under fire for being cheap or expensive, but for violating specific consumer rights: fake discounts, false urgency, misrepresented return policies, and lack of transparency. If Delhaize or Ahold does something similar, they can and should be investigated too, but the comparison only holds if the violations are legally equivalent.

Immigration Is the Only Thing Propping Up California’s Population

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
California’s population grew 0.6% in 2024, adding nearly 250,000 residents to reach 39.43 million, according to Census Bureau estimates. The growth came entirely from a rebound in international immigration, which surged to over 300,000 people after plunging to 44,000 during the pandemic’s worst year.

Without immigration, the state would have shrunk significantly as domestic migration remained negative. The H-1B visa program alone brought nearly 79,000 skilled workers to California in 2024. Since 2010, California has added 2.7 million immigrants, with half coming from Asia and slightly more than a third from Latin America. The immigration-dependent growth model puts California at particular risk from potential federal policy changes, as more than a quarter of its population is foreign-born — the highest share nationwide.

Not “significantly”

By dpille • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
With literally zero immigrants since 2010, California’s population would have shrunk by one tenth of one percent per year. Significant only if you’re trying to make some political point about the state.

What Californians call economic emmigrants

By TheMiddleRoad • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

We call them losers.
If you can’t make it hear, it’s for a lack of trying or a lack of competence. There are lots of opportunities.
The immigrants who come to California work quite hard and often make lots of money.
A lot of retirees leave, of course, cashing in on their houses that have dramatically appreciated.

Re:Not “significantly”

By 93 Escort Wagon • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Yeah, doing some quick math using the numbers from TFS - the population loss without international immigrants would’ve been 50K people. Out of a population of 39.5 million.

Somehow I don’t think LA’s traffic is getting any better…

Re:Agolf Shittler ruining America

By maladroit • Score: 5, Informative Thread

50+ Venezuelans Imprisoned in El Salvador Came to US Legally, Never Violated Immigration Law

Shortly after the US government illegally and unconstitutionally transported about 240 Venezuelans to be imprisoned
in El Salvador’s horrific “terrorism” prison on March 15, CBS News published their names. A subsequent CBS News
investigation found that 75 percent of the men on that list had no criminal record in the United States or abroad. Less
attention has been paid to the fact that dozens of these men never violated immigration laws either.

https://www.cato.org/blog/50-v…

I suspect that your “preferred news feed” has not been telling you this, because there’s no rational way to describe sending people to a concentration camp as “going after criminals and activists.”

It’s not how our economy works

By rsilvergun • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
The population decreases significant because our entire economy is based on rapid population growth feeding the insatiable appetite for profit. Without that growth our corporate Masters start to devour us, which is exactly what you’re seeing with plummeting wages and 25% of the country are there unemployed or living below poverty.

Think of it this way, you know how half of Slash that will tell you that you don’t need to worry about automation and AI because you can just go be a plumber?

Well actual plumbers only make about 20 to 25 an hour which isn’t a hell of a lot of money in a country where a two-bedroom apartment costs $2,100 a month and up.

The big money you see plumbers making is people running their own business and employing other plumbers.

The thing is if you’re going to be a plumber with your own business and a few employees under you and that’s basically a pyramid scheme. You make the good money by running your own business so you can get all the money and then having a couple of employees so that you can pocket a bit of the money they are earning in exchange for stable paycheck and some experience and more importantly the know how for finding customers and running a business which plenty of people can’t do.

But to make that happen you need a growing economy and population with it because otherwise what ends up happening is everyone ends up concentrated in a tiny little area and you’re competing with too many other plumbers.

See those two guys you employed sooner or later are going to be happy with the $20 an hour you’re paying them. That’s not enough for them to afford a wife and kids.

So they’re going to strike out on their own. If the population is growing we are building new cities and they’re going to set up shop far enough away from you that they aren’t directly competing with you. If not then they’re going to set up shop in your backyard and suddenly you’re all competing for the same shrinking pool of customers.

This pretty much goes for every single business and every single thing humans do. On top of that while this is going on you have private equity companies moving in to try and take over your business. In a massively growing economy they would be focused on making all their money off the growth but because the population and economy aren’t growing they are going after a smaller prey than usual, you and your little plumbing business.

Now there are alternatives to endless rapacious growth as a economic system but they require social changes and discarding certain sacred cows and that’s not going to happen because as your population is declining you have more and more old people and therefore they are running the show because they can outvote the young people and they don’t like change. They want everything to be exactly the way it was when they were 12.

So we are basically trapped in a nostalgia fueled Doom loop and I don’t see any way out of it.

Nikon To Raise Camera Prices in the US Because of Tariffs

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
Nikon will raise prices on its cameras and imaging products in the United States starting June 23, citing President Donald Trump’s tariffs on Chinese-made goods as the reason for what the company calls a "necessary price adjustment.” The Japanese camera maker joins a growing list of photography equipment manufacturers implementing price increases, including Canon, Sony, Leica, and lens maker Sigma. Nikon told investors the tariffs could slash its profits by 10 billion yen ($70 million) in the upcoming fiscal year, though the company has not disclosed which specific products will see increases or by how much prices will rise.

LOL and they believed him

By JustAnotherOldGuy • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

LOL the suckers believed him when Trump said other countries would pay the tariffs. MAGAs are colossal dumbfucks, some of the most gullible people to walk the earth.

Re:Question about manufacturing in America

By evil_aaronm • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Why are so many people here convinced we should no make anything in the country anymore?

I don’t think “should” is the correct term, here: I think “can” is more appropriate. Companies, under the whip of Wall Street, demand monstrous quarterly profits, while American workers demand monstrous paychecks to fund their ever increasing standard of living. I mean, are you really even a man if you don’t have a $100k boosted truck, towing a boat, or an RV - or both - and a mansion to drive home to? Well, generally, you can’t have both monstrous profits and monstrous paychecks. So if you want to bring manufacturing back to America, you have to reduce costs - particularly labor - to justify the effort, or manufacturers won’t bother. Lower labor cost and resulting increased profit is why manufacturing left in the first place, particularly under Reagan. Note that I’m not even touching environmental issues, here: just labor. So, if manufacturing could be done here, it probably would.

Re:LOL and they believed him

By fahrbot-bot • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

LOL the suckers believed him when Trump said other countries would pay the tariffs. MAGAs are colossal dumbfucks, some of the most gullible people to walk the earth.

And lazy. Even a cursory Google search for “tariff” (or “define tariff”) shows it’s a fee (tax) paid by the importer and often (usually) passed on to the consumer. Literally the first sentence of the Wikipedia page says:

A tariff or import tax is a duty imposed by a national government, customs territory, or supranational union on imports of goods and is paid by the importer.

Idolatry doesn’t have to include willful ignorance and blind loyalty / obedience.

Re:Question about manufacturing in America

By fahrbot-bot • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I see so many comments that manufacturing can’t come back to the us. Why are so many people here convinced we should not make anything in the country anymore?

We could, but most things would probably be (much?) more expensive, mainly due to labor and environmental laws. In addition, it takes time and money to build production facilities and domestic supply chains — doesn’t do any good to build domestically, if all the parts and/or raw materials are imported (and tariffed). Production facilities couldn’t be built/ramped up to scale before Trump leaves office; if a Democrat is elected (or even a level-headed Republican), the tariffs will probably go away and foreign goods will again be less expensive than domestically produced versions. Companies don’t want to accept that financial risk.

Also, US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick insisted on his April 6th Face the Nation appearance that President Trump’s tariffs will “stay in place” and will result in things like “the army of millions and millions of human beings screwing in little screws to make iPhones” coming to the US. He acknowledged that “it’s gonna be automated,” which is just one of the reasons more manufacturing may not mean more jobs.

So either millions and millions of U.S. workers will be screwing in tiny iPhone screws (fun!) or those tasks will be automated. Neither of those options sound that great for American workers or that they pay well. Of course this Administration sees most of us a disposable serfs, which explains the attempted rollback of labor and environment protections and health insurance access/affordability.

Re:I guess I can buy that American-made camera

By jools33 • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Kodak actually produced their own sensors for a while - including the full-frame 18-megapixel KAF-18500 used in the Leica M9.
But to go back to that… would only require an updated fab… and then all of the components needed to integrate… Cameras are complicated as is their supply chain, tariffs are unfortunately not very sophisticated…
Hence why Nikon has to raise prices, as they have a lot of complexity just to try to guess what the new price might be.
It looks to me - with these new prices - that the same lens is now considerably cheaper in Sweden than in the US - and I can tell you as a Swedish resident and a grey haired photographer - this is the first time I have ever seen that.

Remembering John Young, Co-founder of Web Archive Cryptome

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
New submitter zuki shares an obit published at The Register:
John Young, the co-founder of the legendary internet archive Cryptome, died at the age of 89 on March 28. The Register talked to friends and peers who gave tribute to a bright, pugnacious man who was devoted to the public’s right to know.

Before WikiLeaks, OpenLeaks, BayFiles, or Transparency Toolkit, there was Cryptome - an open internet archive that inspired them all, helped ignite the first digital crypto war, and even gave Julian Assange his start before falling out with him on principle.

Hopefully new hands will take up the heavy load

By 2TecTom • Score: 3 Thread

of defending the public’s domain against the corruption of copyright and continue the fight against classism. We desperately need people to ensure the rights we fought for are not swept away by the selfish, insatiable and irresponsible interests of the upper classes; as there’s so little real freedom left. At this rate we and our culture will be owned and controlled by elites; welcome to our plutocracy.

Not the Astronaut

By rossdee • Score: 3 Thread

who died in 2018.

Legend

By bill_mcgonigle • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

I didn’t realize he was born in the 1930’s.

Older than a Boomer, he didn’t need to be a “digital native” to understand how the Internet should work.

Truly a legend in Internet History. RIP.

The CIA Secretly Ran a Star Wars Fan Site

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot
alternative_right writes:
The site looks like an ordinary Star Wars fan website from around 2010. But starwarsweb.net was actually a tool built by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) to covertly communicate with its informants in other countries.

Of course they where

By Growlley • Score: 4, Funny Thread
the evil empire

Re:How could they be so stupid

By JoshuaZ • Score: 5, Informative Thread
In 2010, Star Wars was already one of the world’s most popular franchises in a wide variety of countries, including many that would be seen often as anti-US. This is only shortly after the Star Wars prequels were extremely high grossing in the international markets https://www.boxofficemojo.com/showdown/sd3762222596/. Russia and the other post-Soviet states absolutely love Star Wars for example https://www.new-east-archive.org/articles/show/5158/star-wars-film-post-soviet-darth-vader-internet-party-ukraine-red-padawan although the films have not done well in China https://internationalcenter.ufl.edu/why-%E2%80%98star-wars%E2%80%99-keeps-bombing-china. But even in China, this is more than popular enough that visiting a Star Wars website is reasonably plausible.

Jedi Mind Tricks

By RackinFrackin • Score: 4 Thread

This is not the site you’re looking for…

All of your counter points are less nefarious....

By Somervillain • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

At least that’s something, right? It could be worse. They could still be running operations where they drug unwitting US citizens with LSD for “research”. Or extrajudicial killings, torture and/or “renditions”. Or flooding US ghettos with crack cocaine to fund nefarious operations abroad. JFK had the right idea for the CIA: “splinter it into a thousand pieces and scatter it to the winds”.

…than what the Soviet Union or even Britain did. The more I learn about other countries, the more I realize this anti-USA bullshit spewed by self-loathing middle-class and upper-middle-class Americans is ignorant and foolish. Did the CIA do shitty things?…most likely....but nothing compared to what the KGB and FSB did and still do today.

Everything has to be evaluated in context and relative to peers, not in isolation. No country will be perfect, but the USA is better than it’s peers and it’s legacy will state so clearly.

It’s like bitching about Apple…fair…there’s plenty to bitch about if you look at them in isolation…compare them to…who…Microsoft? Google? HP?…then you start to appreciate them.

Would you rather be Gaum under US rule or India under British rule? Haiti under French rule? how about Bulgaria in the Soviet Union?…maybe Ukraine today?....yeah…the CIA sucks…until you compare them to the KGB/FSB, MOIS/VAJA, etc. They’re quite angelic when compared to their peers both today and in history.

Re:How could they be so stupid

By Known Nutter • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
I like that some schmuck on /. thinks they’ve got the international spy game on lock. You believe that one-line in a paywalled article on a no-name bullshit site citing a source as “an amateur security researcher” is the real story? That this particular site can be traced back to the “wave of deaths of CIA sources” in China 15 years ago? C’mon man.