Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. California ‘Billionaire Tax’ Makes Ballot Despite Opposition From Tech Moguls
  2. Midjourney Pivots From AI Image Generation To Body Scanning Medical Spa
  3. Bernie Sanders Unveils $7 Trillion Plan To Give Americans Control of AI Industry
  4. Apple Announces Major App Store Changes on iOS in Brazil
  5. Android 17 Drops For Pixel Phones and Watch
  6. Google Told Researcher ‘Nice Catch!’ Then Denied Bug Bounty For Flaw It Still Hasn’t Fixed
  7. Tim Cook Says Apple Price Increases Are ‘Unavoidable’ Due To Memory Costs
  8. You Can No Longer Fly Or Purchase a Drone In Beijing
  9. Brian Johnson, Special Effects Artist Behind ‘Space: 1999,’ Dies At 86
  10. China’s EV Price War Was Built On Cars Sold At a Loss
  11. Tesco Moving 40,000 Server Workloads Off VMware Amid Broadcom’s ‘Abusive Conduct’
  12. Microsoft Working To Patch ‘RoguePlanet’ Zero-Day
  13. Smartphone Market To Shrink 15% This Year Due To Memory Crisis
  14. Carvana Is Turning Dealerships Into ‘Playgrounds,’ Test-Drive Centers With Sales All Online
  15. Google, Microsoft, and OpenAI Back Linux Foundation’s Appia AI Standards Initiative

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

California ‘Billionaire Tax’ Makes Ballot Despite Opposition From Tech Moguls

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
California’s proposed “billionaire tax” has gathered enough signatures to qualify for the November ballot, setting up a major fight between labor unions and some of Silicon Valley’s richest figures. From the report:
The California Billionaire Tax Act, colloquially known as the billionaire tax, would levy a one-time 5% tax on any California resident worth more than $1bn. The proposal is backed by the Service Employees International Union-United Healthcare Workers West as a means of funding California’s strained healthcare and education programs. The proposal has become one of the state’s biggest political flashpoints as it gained momentum throughout the year, with prominent billionaires, such as the Google co-founder Larry Page, making moves to cut ties with the state and Newsom vowing to block it from going to a vote. Although it has gained enough signatures for the ballot, the groups backing the measure have until June 25 to decide whether to move forward or potentially strike a deal with the state.

While unions backing the group have framed the proposal as a way of getting the ultra-rich to pay their fair share, many of the state’s tech elites have condemned the tax and spent millions attempting to crush it. The Google co-founder Sergey Brin has spent $82m alone on efforts to fight the tax, while joining other Silicon Valley billionaires in declaring he will leave California if it goes through. The Palantir co-founder Peter Thiel, crypto billionaire Chris Larsen and Ring founder James Siminoff are among the other tech moguls who have made huge political donations to groups opposing the tax. California has the most billionaires out of any state, many of whom have increased their wealth in recent years amid the AI boom.

“One time”

By markdavis • Score: 3, Insightful Thread

>“colloquially known as the billionaire tax, would levy a one-time 5% tax on any California resident worth more than $1bn.”

If it goes through and eventually becomes law, who really believes this will be a ONE-TIME ever tax on the UNREALIZED wealth of individuals?

Midjourney Pivots From AI Image Generation To Body Scanning Medical Spa

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Midjourney is expanding beyond AI image generation with plans for a medical-imaging business built around a water-based, full-body ultrasound scanner that uses hundreds of thousands of sensors and AI to reconstruct MRI-like images. “As you descend into the water, hundreds of thousands of tiny elements take turns, sending out waves, listening together, compressing and then streaming data to a massive cluster where thousands of computers split the task,” Midjourney explained in the announcement. “By looking at how the shapes of all the waves change, we reconstruct a detailed map or ‘image’ which basically lets us figure out what’s in there.” The company hopes to open a San Francisco scanning “spa” in late 2027, with 50,000 or more deployed around the world by 2031. The Register reports:
It’s not clear how fast the process is with the prototype unit, but Midjourney said its goal is for the whole thing to take around a minute. “We think it’s completely possible that with enough early imaging in the future, the world could avoid 30% of all deaths and 50% of all healthcare costs,” the company added.

According to a “technical” video included in the announcement, there’s a ring of 40 scanners included in the prototype unit the company has built. That ring of 40 elements contains 358,000 ultrasonic elements made up of tiny transducers that create ultrasound waves in water while listening for how they change when they slap the body of whoever is in Midjourney’s dunk tank up to a thousand times a second.

[…] Midjourney said that it’s planning to open its first ultrasound scanner spa at the end of 2027, but it has another hurdle to jump: FDA approval. Beyond improving its tech so that the second-generation scanner is ready for its 2027 spa date, “regulation is the next limit,” the company said. “Normally, for every diagnostic medical capability you need FDA approval,” Midjourney explained. “We’re starting by just giving you detailed body composition maps — and we’ll be submitting regular test results to the FDA for increased capabilities.”

Midjourney also fails to mention how it will store and secure those scans, whether it will use said scans to train its body composition-detection algorithms, and how it’s ensuring those algorithms get things right that it usually take a human a few years of education and training to learn.

Burning other peoples money until?

By oldgraybeard • Score: 3 Thread
The money runs out or they get lucky and trip over an actual business model.

0.5 mm resolution

By backslashdot • Score: 3 Thread

0.5 resolution is what a standard MRI provides. If it can do that and differentiate hard and soft tissue I will be impressed. The demo images they showed looked nowhere near the required accuracy. They still have a year to get it working I guess. Ultrasonic is very difficult given blood flow and all the associated movement with heart beating and all that. Also, they claim it is safe due to lack of radiation. But ultrasonic can fuck shit up too. I mean ultrasonic is currently used to break up kidney stones, shear and fragment DNA (for NGS prep).

Bernie Sanders Unveils $7 Trillion Plan To Give Americans Control of AI Industry

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from the Associated Press:
As artificial intelligence companies reshape the economy and race toward trillion-dollar valuations, Sen. Bernie Sanders is proposing a sweeping transfer of wealth and power from the industry to the American public. The legislation, shown first to The Associated Press, would create a sovereign wealth fund overseen by an independent commission and financed through a one-time 50% tax on the stock of the largest AI companies. Sanders estimates that the tax would create a nearly $7 trillion fund that would generate hundreds of billions of dollars annually in direct payments to Americans and programs such as health care, education and housing.

[…] The 50% tax would apply to AI companies that reach $200 million in annual AI sales. Any new AI company that reaches that benchmark would also be subject to the tax. It would create a sovereign wealth fund — similar to those used by countries around the world and some U.S. states — that Sanders estimates would be worth around $7 trillion. Unlike a traditional tax, the proposal would require companies to transfer stock rather than cash, effectively making the American public a major shareholder in the country’s largest AI firms.

A seven-person independent commission — nominated by the president and confirmed by the Senate — would manage the fund and use its voting shares “to block decisions that hurt the American people and to push for policies that help them,” the bill summary says. Sanders proposes that a 5% annual dividend from the fund would provide direct payments of more than $1,000 to every American. If companies grow, the gains would be used for public goods such as education, housing and health care. Sanders argues taxpayers would not bear the losses if AI company valuations decline. “We’re not going to lose any money, even if there is a bust in the bubble,” Sanders said. The commission would be directed to “to block decisions that hurt the American people and to push for policies that help them,” according to the summary.
“The benefits cannot simply go to the handful of wealthy corporations. They will be shared by the American people,” the independent Vermont senator said in an interview Wednesday. “The public has got to have a significant seat at the table to make sure that terrible things do not happen to ordinary people, and that in fact, AI benefits ordinary people, not hurts them,” Sanders said.

Re: No thanks

By AvitarX • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I’m not into socialism, but I’m not convinced it’s worse than 1 company having control of what’s today’s entire GDP in the relatively short term. And that’s what SpaceX is claiming they’ll have in the case for their valuation.

Re: Thinking Too Small

By AvitarX • Score: 4, Funny Thread

I’d like to see corporations able to be tried as people. 5 year jail sentence = 5 year government ownership.

Re: No thanks

By Bodhammer • Score: 4, Funny Thread
“If the government wants ownership it can pay for it with borrowed money just like everyone else.”

tftfy

Re:Fox News Headline Alternative

By znrt • Score: 4, Informative Thread

i have news for you: there is no left in america, let alone radical. there is only right, extreme right and fanatical right.

bernie knows prefectly well this is doa, he’s just trying to get some attention.

Re: No thanks

By getuid() • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

It did.

Whose money did you think those bailouts, handouts, stimuli etc were?

Apple Announces Major App Store Changes on iOS in Brazil

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Apple is allowing iPhone developers in Brazil to distribute apps through authorized alternative marketplaces and use third-party payment systems following action by the country’s competition regulator. “In other words, developers in Brazil will be able to circumvent the App Store and Apple’s in-app purchase system, but there are still fees,” reports MacRumors. Apple will collect commissions ranging from 5% on externally distributed apps to as much as 26% for some App Store transactions using its payment system. From the report:
Alternative app marketplaces will have to be authorized by Apple and will need to meet ongoing requirements. For apps that are still distributed through the App Store, developers will be able to include an alternative payment processing method in their app and/or link users to a website to complete a transaction. These changes are available on iOS 26.5 and later, and they are the result of regulatory action from Brazil’s competition regulator. Apple has added a new page on its website with additional details for developers in Brazil.

Apple said these changes introduce privacy and security risks for users, including children. The company has introduced safeguards to mitigate these risks, including a notarization process for iOS apps, an authorization process for app marketplaces, and limitations on external links and alternative payments for users under the age of 18. Apple has already allowed alternative app stores and/or third-party payment systems on iOS in the EU, Japan, and South Korea, and it will likely be forced to do so in the UK and Australia too, due to similar regulations in those countries.

No, but you see, I don’t want any commission…

By dgatwood • Score: 3 Thread

No, but you see, I don’t want any commission on apps that aren’t sold by Apple, for which Apple has no role in the creation or distribution of the app. They’re not doing anything to earn that money.

The cost of developing the OS is paid for by the people buying hardware. After all, you can’t sell hardware without the OS.

And while you could argue that the cost of developing the developer tools should be borne by developers (including Apple, who use those tools to building the OS, of course), Apple’s rules mandating the use of their tools makes doing so problematic from an antitrust perspective. And either way, a software license that effectively takes a cut of sales on anything developed with that software is problematic at multiple levels. Nobody in their right minds would choose a product under those terms, absent some sort of monopolistic restrictions that compel such a choice.

The correct percentage is zero, with, at absolute most, some small fixed annual fee for program participation to compensate Apple for the limited overhead incurred in signing developers’ keys. Any higher cost is effectively holding users’ devices hostage, and is fundamentally unjust from a consumer protection perspective.

The only question is how long it takes for various countries’ governments to come to the same conclusion and demand that mobile devices be liberated from compulsory profit-sharing done under the guise of “security”.

Typical Apple being Apple

By fred6666 • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Imagine if Toyota tried to charge 5% fee on all gas purchases not even sold by Toyota.

Android 17 Drops For Pixel Phones and Watch

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Google has begun rolling out Android 17, the June Pixel Feature Drop, and Wear OS 7 simultaneously across supported Pixel phones and watches. Highlights include floating app bubbles, improved foldable multitasking and gaming, tighter location and contact permissions, stronger lost-device protections, new Pixel AI tools, and up to 10% better Pixel Watch battery life. PhoneArena reports:
Pixel owners are the clear winners, since everything here reaches Pixel first and a lot of it goes back to the Pixel 6. Fold owners get the most toys, with the Bubble Bar and foldable gaming mode built for the big screen. Watch wearers get the quietly important upgrade. Better battery and Live Updates make an everyday wearable easier to rely on, especially if you keep it on overnight.
Google’s latest Pixel Drop combines several AI-powered tools with a broader slate of Android 17 upgrades. Pixel owners gain Lyria 3 for generating music from text or images, Gemini Omni for creating custom video clips, enhanced call translation and screening, AirDrop-compatible Quick Share, expanded Magic Cue support, and conversational photo editing.
Android 17 builds on those additions with floating app Bubbles, selfie-camera Screen Reactions, and a split-screen gaming mode for foldables, while also strengthening privacy and security with more granular location and contact permissions, improved lost-device protection, tighter PIN-guessing limits, and enhanced threat detection.

Other additions include expanded parental controls, separate assistant volume and app memory settings, and an option to hide app names for greater privacy.

You can read more about everything new in Android 17 in Google’s blog post.

Google Told Researcher ‘Nice Catch!’ Then Denied Bug Bounty For Flaw It Still Hasn’t Fixed

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Security researcher Justin O’Leary says Google initially accepted his Config Connector privilege-escalation report as a high-priority, high-severity bug, then denied a bounty by declaring the behavior “working as intended.” According to The Register, a Google rep initially praised O’Leary’s report with a “Nice catch!” before the cloud giant reversed course, declaring that no vulnerability existed and therefore no fix or reward was warranted. “The bug report, however, is still marked high-priority and accepted,” the publication notes. The alleged flaw, dubbed ConfigConfusion, could let a Kubernetes namespace user exploit an overprivileged service account to become a GCP organization owner with only a few lines of YAML and little apparent audit visibility. O’Leary details the incident in a blog post. The Register reports:
According to O’Leary, Config Connector doesn’t perform an authorization check, and this allows any Config Connector service account with org-level permissions to bypass Identity and Access Management (IAM) authorization and gain the highest level of control (roles/owner) to an entire GCP Organization — the root node of all of a company’s resources within Google Cloud. On March 27, a Google security engineer accepted O’Leary’s report and told him: “Nice catch!” The employee said that they filed a bug based on O’Leary’s report with the relevant product team and assured him the Chocolate Factory’s security squad would work with relevant Google Cloud people to fix the flaw. “We’ll work with the product team to ensure this issue is address. We’ll let you know when the issue was fixed,” the engineer said. “In the meantime, review the payment option selected in your bughunters.google.com profile.”

Google assigned the bug P1 priority and S1 severity, signifying a flaw worthy of urgent repair because it affects a large percentage of users and can disrupt core organizational functions. “I figured that was the end of that,” O’Leary said in a phone interview with The Register. Eleven days later, on April 7, he received a new message from a Google Security Bot reversing the earlier decision. The Reg viewed the email, and O’Leary included a screenshot in his Thursday writeup. The message said that the Cloud Vulnerability Reward Program panel decided that the “security impact of this issue does not meet the criteria to qualify for a reward.”

After reviewing the bug report, Google determined the software “is working as intended,” the message continued. It also noted that the program’s decision not to pay a bounty “does not mean that the product team won’t fix the issue.” Nearly three months later, the case remains P1/S1 with the status “in progress (accepted).” Google hasn’t assigned a CVE or issued a fix. O’Leary didn’t receive any reward for his research. […] “This is a pattern,” O’Leary told [The Register]. “This is just how these trillion-dollar companies deal with people like me. In my day job, we use GKE, and it’s incredibly frustrating on my end, when I find a critical vulnerability in the system that’s being widely used, and I can’t even get the vendor to patch their own stuff.”
A Google spokesperson told The Register: “The issue reported does not qualify for a reward because the GCP IAM authorization bypass is only exploitable if an attacker has access to a Config Connector Service Account that’s been granted the Organization Admin role by the organization (i.e., it is privileged). Additionally, an attacker would first need to gain entry to an organization’s environment (e.g., an exposed container) in order to leverage the privileged Config Connector instance and execute commands with administrative authority, such as the IAM bypass. Granting this level of access to the Config Connector Service Account goes against Google Cloud’s publicly shared best practices and the principle of least privilege.”

Well then

By nasch • Score: 4, Funny Thread

You know what to do, security researchers. Next time you find an exploit just publish it, because Google obviously doesn’t want your feedback.

Seems defensible.

By Petersko • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

From their bounty program page at https://bughunters.google.com/… :

“Insecure customer configurations (such as unconditionally injecting shared secrets or misconfiguring security-related settings) rather than a product vulnerability.}

If their published standards indicate that giving the connector that level of admin permissions is excessive, and the access needed to exploit this is as clearly a set of poor security management as the last paragraph of the summary implies, then, “Yes, it should be corrected, and no, it’s not bounty worthy” seems a reasonable stance to take. It sits right in the zone of that definition.

You could have the argument, but it’s not clear to me that Google has it wrong.

This is why “responsible disclosure” isn’t

By Arrogant-Bastard • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
This isn’t the first, or the tenth, or the hundredth time this has happened to some security researcher dealing with some company. And even when their research is properly acknowledged and credited, the payouts are pitifully small. The entire concept of “responsible disclosure” is to guilt people who don’t work for companies into free labor for them, donating it, and then receiving neither credit nor fair compensation.

It’s time to discard not just the practice, but the entire concept, because the industry has proven that it concocted this nonsense as a one-sided deal, and that it will screw anyone/everyone at every possible opportunity. It’s time for researchers to abandon any attempt to collaborate with companies, because it doesn’t work.

What should they do instead? Just drop the vulnerabilites and let the companies deal with the fallout. They’re too cheap, too lazy, and in too much of a hurry to make sure their products/services are secure before they start selling them, so they deserve what they get. Let them burn.

Nightmare Eclipse

By bill_mcgonigle • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Pay the bounty.

The two other possible outcomes are Nightmare Eclipse (she’s really on a roll!) or 0day sales on DNM’s.

It doesn’t even matter whether a decision to fix is made.

Gosh, you’d think $GOOG was broke.

The new Google motto

By jenningsthecat • Score: 3 Thread

Pick from any of the following:
— Don’t be good
— Don’t be sensible
— Don’t be responsible
— Don’t be averse to being a dickhead

It would be great if somebody sponsored a “choose a new motto for Google” contest. Maybe Louis Rossman - he’d likely have the balls to do it if YouTube wasn’t so important for him. Hell, he might do it anyway - he seems like a really scrappy give-zero-shits kind of guy.

Tim Cook Says Apple Price Increases Are ‘Unavoidable’ Due To Memory Costs

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from MacRumors:
Apple is raising its prices to offset the high cost of memory and storage, CEO Tim Cook told The Wall Street Journal. Apple is no longer able to absorb the increased prices and will need to pass some of the cost on to consumers. “Unfortunately, price increases are unavoidable,” said Cook. “We’re doing our best to mitigate the huge increases that are being passed to us, and we’ve been trying to shield our customers from the increases, but the situation has become unsustainable.”

Growing demand for memory and storage chips from AI companies has led to chip shortages and higher costs. The Wall Street Journal suggests Apple will need to increase device costs “substantially” to maintain its current profit margins given the cost of memory chips and SSDs. Research firm TechInsights claims Apple will need to make the iPhone 18 Pro around $270 more expensive to keep its existing profit margin.

Apple is struggling more with memory chips, but storage chips are also an issue. “There’s less supply at a time when consumers want devices and the memory guys are passing along huge price increases,” Cook told The Wall Street Journal. Cook said Apple will use its cash to increase memory supply, but he did not give details on what that means. Apple does not plan to create its own memory and storage factories. “We can’t do everything,” Cook said. “We know what we’re good at.”
Cook likened the memory shortages to a hundred-year flood. “I’ve never seen anything like it in any area in over 40 years,” he said.
Further reading: Smartphone Market To Shrink 15% This Year Due To Memory Crisis

Re:No surprise

By UnknowingFool • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Perhaps it’s because Apple have a $1 Trillion cash flow sitting in the bank and not wanting to off set a bit to cover the temp price hikes, so got to fleece the Apple customers some more.

I think you are confusing that Apple stock is over $1T with Apple having $1T in cash in the bank. They do not. According to their annual report dated September 25, 2025, they had about $35B in cash.

Oh no less than 300% profit margin! what to do!

By Matrix9180 • Score: 3 Thread

Heaven forbid Apple have to forego their insane profit margins in the name of consumer affordability. They’d rather charge you$18000 for a slab of glass than let go of 300% profit

Small Violin

By ebonum • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

A lot of factories run on a 10% or less Net Profit. These guys have to raise prices or go under. Apple is going from an obscene profit to a profit that 99% of the world can only dream about.

Apple could easily eat the cost increase, but when pure greed drives every business decision....

Re:Wow

By UnknowingFool • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Apple has enough money to invest in additional production capacity.

I don’t know if you’ve checked recently but Apple does not make RAM. They don’t actually manufacture chips. They contract TSMC to make their CPUs. They buy commodity chips like RAM.

No one wants to dump billions investing in new manufacturing capacity that will take at least a year to come online and may only start producing when the market returns to normal though.

Yes that’s why the RAM manufacturers (which are not Apple) are charging lots of money now for RAM.

Apple certainly can afford to take that risk and if the memory market continues like it is for the next few years then Apple would make an absolute killing with such a move.

1) There is a difference between having lots of money and having the resources to do something. Apple does not manufacture RAM. 2) How would Apple “make a killing” again? Apple does not sell components to anyone. Apple will certainly do everything they can to secure supply of components; they do not sell components like RAM, CPUs, etc.

Burst Already

By chipperdog • Score: 3 Thread
The AI bubble should burst soon.

You Can No Longer Fly Or Purchase a Drone In Beijing

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Longtime Slashdot reader schwit1 shares a report from PetaPixel:
China dominates the consumer drone market, so it is perhaps surprising that it is no longer possible to fly or even purchase a drone in Beijing. The new law that passed last month makes it illegal to buy, rent, or fly a drone without prior approval from the authorities. Users must also complete an online training session and pass a test on drone regulations. Under the new rules, drone users are also not allowed to repair or replace their drones in Beijing. Not only that, but a drone in a repair shop must be picked up in-person, rather than sent back by delivery.

The BBC reports that drones must now be registered before being brought into and out of the Chinese capital. “I have to apply for permission for each flight, which is very inconvenient,” drone enthusiast Steven Wang tells CNN. “And starting this year, the wait time is getting longer, and the reasons for rejection are becoming more vague.” Despite China being the birthplace of the consumer drone industry, it is increasingly difficult for hobbyists to fly there. Beijing authorities say that the rules are made to “strengthen the management of unmanned aerial vehicles” and “safeguard the security of the capital.”

Dictators

By phantomfive • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Dictators are always afraid of their population.

And for good reasons.

Clickbait

By ArchieBunker • Score: 3 Thread

Drones now require training and a permit. Sounds accurate for a densely populated city. Next talk about motor vehicles.

Restrictions

By JBMcB • Score: 4, Informative Thread
The restrictions are about the same as NYC and for the same reasons. DC is covered by the flight paths for two extremely busy airports, along with all the random military aircraft flying around DC in particular. Our main airport is next to a small suburban town, and you can’t fly a drone there, either.

Brian Johnson, Special Effects Artist Behind ‘Space: 1999,’ Dies At 86

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Special-effects designer Brian Johnson, known for his groundbreaking work on Space: 1999, The Empire Strikes Back, Alien, and Aliens, has died at the age of 86. Johnson began his career creating models and explosions for Gerry and Sylvia Anderson productions, later designed the iconic Eagle Transporter, and became one of science fiction cinema’s most influential behind-the-scenes artists. Longtime Slashdot reader sandbagger remembers the SFX legend, writing: “The Space: 1999 Eagle is one of the great space ships of science fiction.”

The Eagle

By jd • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Let’s look at the various aspects of the Eagle design.

1. It was “designed to work in space” so wasn’t designed to be aerodynamic
2. It was modular
3. Mass was kept to a minimum without compromising strength, which is precisely what you would want if your job is to carry a significant mass in space and be able to manoever without ripping apart
4. Cockpits were functional and minimal, not glamorous or more advanced than necessary to do the job

There were terrible aspects as well (nowhere to keep fuel, for example), but if you were going to design a sci-fi ship that is intended to be a simple short-range transport, then the design for the Eagle is close to perfect in a way that most sci-fi vessels really aren’t.

Brian Johnson really did a superb job of actually making something LOOK like a practical workhorse.

Re:The Eagle

By sometimesblue • Score: 4, Informative Thread
The entire body could be swapped in and out depending on the mission too, like as a cargo bay, or science lab. Moonbase Alpha lost 10 eagles across the two series, so they were probably cheap to replace too. The pilot having a big step down into their seat was an odd choice, but did look more dramatic when throwing themselves into it, readying for a quick takeoff.

Re:The Eagle

By nightflameauto • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

The entire body could be swapped in and out depending on the mission too, like as a cargo bay, or science lab. Moonbase Alpha lost 10 eagles across the two series, so they were probably cheap to replace too. The pilot having a big step down into their seat was an odd choice, but did look more dramatic when throwing themselves into it, readying for a quick takeoff.

The pilot stepping down could be viewed as practical. On a landable craft, you’d want someone to have good visibility of the ground on away missions in unfamiliar territory, and the Eagle was large enough that the step-down to reach that visibility is a believable component of the craft. It’s an altogether well thought out design that I wish more sci-fi shows had mimicked over the decades since.

SFX Master

By lunadude • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

He was also instrumental in the production of 2001: A Space Odyssey, Alien, Dragonslayer, DragonHeart, and Space Truckers. I understand he was also a super nice guy. His inspiration lives on in so many designers and builders.

China’s EV Price War Was Built On Cars Sold At a Loss

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Longtime Slashdot reader schwit1 shares a report from Autoblog:
For years, the Chinese auto industry has employed a hostile price war to kneecap global competitors. Armed with massive state subsidies, cheap raw materials, and an aggressive “scale-first” business model, Chinese automakers flooded the market with electric vehicles priced so low that legacy manufacturers stood no chance to compete. How did they do it? Simple, they couldn’t. They did it anyway. Reports from CarNewsChina show that Chinese automakers have been selling vehicles at a loss until a recent law passed by the Chinese government banned below-cost sales of new vehicles. During the ongoing sales slump in China caused by rolled-back subsidies and direct government intervention banning below-cost sales, the truth behind the rapid expansion of the Chinese auto industry has been exposed.
“By the first quarter of 2026, China captured 32 percent of the global auto market, with its New Energy Vehicles (NEVs) controlling an incredible 61 percent of global share,” the report notes. Yet that dominance has come at a steep cost: throughout 2025, “the profit margin for China’s auto industry plunged to 4.4 percent and dropped further to a historic low of 3.2 percent in early 2026.”
“Gross profit, not net profit, per vehicle, plummeted to a mere $2,000. We can expect the net figure to be loss-making.” Autoblog adds: “Data shows over 70 percent of Chinese car sales were loss-making. This left more than half of the country’s auto industry in the red. Great Wall Motor (GWM) even saw net profits drop 17 percent despite steady revenue growth.”

China’s EV price war has now hit a wall. New regulations are discouraging below-cost sales, rising material costs are forcing automakers to cut discounts and raise prices, and reduced tax incentives are weakening domestic demand. To sustain growth, manufacturers are increasingly turning to exports.

So what?

By BytePusher • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Tesla also didn’t make money on its cars. That’s how new businesses oftentimes work.

Re:Sojust like every other tech growth story

By AmiMoJo • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

From Europe we look at Americans that way too. Long hours, ridiculously little holiday entitlement (I just booked flights for my six week break over the new year, and I’ve still got time off to spare), and a billionaire-Epstien ruling class who live in luxury. Only they also get pollution, mass deportations, bankrupted by healthcare costs, school shootings, and so on.

China is far from perfect, but it also doesn’t compare that badly.

Re: Sojust like every other tech growth story

By hdyoung • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Um. What country are you talking about? It certainly isnt China. At least, not in this timeline. Basically, every line of your post is grossly distorted or straight up wrong. Home ownership means something totally different than in the west, and the hokou system means that huge numbers of peoples official âoehomesâ are plots of land a thousand kilometers out in some rural area. Their inflation numbers are grossly distorted by their trade policy and monetary control. Medical bankruptcy most DEFINITELY exists. Most would never admit it openly because they dont want to spend 6 months in a âoere-educationâ program, but pensions are so small and state support is so thin that people have no faith that the government will take care of them in any way at all, so they save obsessively. China has made some incredible accomplishments in the past century that the west ignores (eg a legit billion people raised out of poverty), but you are completely confused about their strengths and weaknesses.

Re:Sojust like every other tech growth story

By Ritz_Just_Ritz • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Try getting admitted to a Chinese hospital without a fat wad of cash in your pocket up front. I double dog dare ya. If you have no money, they will let you bleed out in the waiting room. If you are in a city/town without a local hukou, you’re double fucked.

The number of sock puppets shilling for China here is rather astounding.

Sales loss or operating loss

By FeelGood314 • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Tesla did not take 9 years to sell a car profitably. Tesla was founded in 2003 and could sell a roadster at a profit in 2009. Tesla’s first profitable quarter was first quarter 2013. The difference is Tesla was sinking all their money into expanding and designing new products. Now if Chinese auto makers are still selling the physical cars at a loss then that is a big problem for them. For us, the consumers, it’s like someone giving you free money.

Tesco Moving 40,000 Server Workloads Off VMware Amid Broadcom’s ‘Abusive Conduct’

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica:
Tesco, a retail conglomerate headquartered in the United Kingdom, is moving 40,000 server workloads off of VMware amid “abusive conduct” from Broadcom, recent legal filings claim. Tesco filed a lawsuit in the UK’s High Court against Broadcom alleging breach of contract last year. According to a September report from The Register, the lawsuit claimed that in January 2021, Tesco bought perpetual licenses for VMware’s vSphere Foundation and Cloud Foundation, a subscription to VMware Tanzu, plus support services until 2026, with the option to extend support for four additional years.

But when Broadcom took over VMware in November 2023, it would not honor the deal and instead tried to get Tesco to pay “excessive and inflated prices for virtualization software for which Tesco has already paid” and would not allow it to buy support services for its perpetually licensed software without buying “duplicative subscription-based licenses for those same Software products,” the initial complaint read, The Register reported at the time. Tesco, which reported 73.7 billion pounds (about $98.7 billion) in revenue in its fiscal year 2026, has since started migrating away from VMware and Broadcom’s mainframe products, according to late-May court filings reported on by The Register today.

In January, Broadcom stopped supporting Tesco’s VMware products, Tesco said, and Tesco has been paying for third-party support since. In its initial filing, Tesco also said that Broadcom refused to upgrade software or provide all security updates to customers without subscriptions. One of Tesco’s recent filings, per The Register, reads: “Faced with Broadcom’s abusive conduct, and given the criticality of virtualization and mainframe software and services to its business, Tesco has been forced to incur material costs to procure alternative solutions with reduced functionality, and to migrate to that software in a manner, and on a timeframe, that creates very significant risks to its business.”

If it works “at exceptional pace,” Tesco will be completely off VMware by the end of 2027 at the earliest. However, “the timeframe in which that migration must be undertaken has created and continues to create operational and commercial risk, and at material ongoing cost and disruption to the business,” Tesco reportedly noted. Tesco is also dealing with migration challenges related to data security because its new, unnamed virtualization software is incompatible with the Veeam and Zerto products it uses. Tesco initially requested at least 100 million pounds (about $133.6 million) in damages each from Broadcom, VMware, and reseller Computacenter, plus interest. In its recent filings, Tesco said it turned down at least four offers from Broadcom to continue using VMware and Broadcom’s mainframe tech. […] The case is expected to go to court between November 1, 2027, and February 25, 2028, The Register reported. Afterward, it could go to trial.
Further reading: HPE Tempts VMware Users, Partners With Year of Free Virtualization Software

Re:Precedent?

By Jayhawk0123 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

should be interesting like you said… Europe isn’t as quick to F over the people in exchange for corporate BS.

I hope Broadcom gets destroyed. The precedent upholding this bs is you can sell services/goods with licenses, then have another company buy you, keep all the profits from that and not honor the contracts. One can do this perpetually and grift customers and completely undermine all contracts. How this is even thought to be okay is insane, no sane logical person would look at this and think this is how contracts work and what perpetual means. Buying a company- there is due diligence done BECASUE you buy the company whole and it’s LIABILITIES… even if those are contracts you don’t like. Normally, they’d need to buy out the contract or re-negotiate first. In some jurisdictions- contract changes are a 2 party system where both need to agree on changes to the terms no matter the TOS.

Justice delayed is justice denied

By innocent_white_lamb • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

“The case is expected to go to court between November 1, 2027, and February 25, 2028, The Register reported. Afterward, it could go to trial.”

So two years later, after Tesco has completed all of the emergency work that’s required to change their IT systems to something else, then this matter will be heard.

That timeframe is ridiculous. There’s no reason why the courts can’t operate more efficiently than they do other than that the lawyers and judges have no incentive to move things along.

How many other cases are old news and no longer particularly relevant by the time they’re decided?

Re:Precedent?

By ItsJustAPseudonym • Score: 5, Informative Thread
“The precedent upholding this bs is you can sell services/goods with licenses, then have another company buy you, keep all the profits from that and not honor the contracts. One can do this perpetually and grift customers and completely undermine all contracts.”

Someting like this has happened in the U.S. with unscrupulous solar panel + loan companies. You sign a contract to get the company to install solar panels on your house, and you pay for it with a lien. Usually the company has to maintain the installation. But there have been cases where the original company goes bankrupt, and another company buys all of the loans. The new company demands the client to continue to pay them monthly, but refuses to maintain the system any more, claiming they bought the loans, not the service agreements.

Did not (and won’t) happen to me, but it’s been in the news in the U.S.

Re:Justice delayed is justice denied

By cardpuncher • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Both sides are going to want to get a great deal more evidence to support their positions - Tesco might want access to e-mails and strategy documents from Broadcom and they might want internal documents from Tesco showing what actual difficulties they encountered in migrating away. These will then have to be digested by experts capable of presenting them to the court and a case/defence built around them. All that takes a great deal of time. The aim of a civil case is to get financial restitution for the damages allegedly caused and the full amount probably won’t even be known until the migration process is complete. Filing the case allows the discovery process to begin.

Courts will only intervene urgently if there’s a threat of harm that could not subsequently be compensated adequately by monetary damages. In this case, all parties are large corporations with deep pockets whose continued trading is not in question.

Re:Justice delayed is justice denied

By ledow • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

You need to read The Secret Barrister novels, written by a real criminal-law barrister.

The UK courts are an absolute mess of chaos, that’s not the lawyer’s or the judges fault.

You would think that with a former-lawyer as the prime minister now it would get sorted, but they’ve made only token changes to an absolutely nonsensical court-appointment system that operates largely on constant fire-fighting and ill-preparedness and throwing lawyers to the wolves making them run from case to case with little to no preparation or warning.

It’s continued because “that’s how it’s always been done” but the court system outgrew the capacity decades ago.

Microsoft Working To Patch ‘RoguePlanet’ Zero-Day

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
wiredmikey shares a report from SecurityWeek:
Microsoft on Wednesday published an advisory acknowledging the public disclosure of a vulnerability in Defender that could lead to privilege escalation. The security defect, tracked as CVE-2026-50656 (CVSS score of 7.8), was dropped last week by security researcher Nightmare Eclipse (also known as Chaotic Eclipse). “We are working to provide a high-quality security update that addresses this vulnerability. We will provide information in this CVE when the update is available,” Microsoft adds.

RoguePlanet, Nightmare Eclipse explained last week, targets a race condition in Microsoft Defender and allows attackers to gain System privileges. The researcher released a proof-of-concept (PoC) exploit that demonstrates local privilege escalation (LPE) on Windows 11 and Windows 10 systems with the June 2026 patches installed. […] On Wednesday, Nightmare Eclipse pointed out that the PoC works regardless of whether Defender’s real-time protection is enabled or disabled. It may even work in passive mode, the researcher said.

In Other Words

By jrnvk • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

“the PoC works regardless of whether Defender’s real-time protection is enabled or disabled. It may even work in passive mode”… so in other words, the application that was supposed to protect organizations actually became the attack vector. Awesome!

Regression

By Canberra1 • Score: 3 Thread
So far MS has offered no excuses for the regression of multiple high severity fixes. This guy is reinforcing honesty and accountability. Some think MS can afford code reviews, duty programmers and people who can read dumps and backtrack. No lazy ‘just the minimum’. In my day the author of the defective code, had other code reviewed and fixed. Sounds like this is not being done either. Fear not, AI will soon learn and target the commit tree by the weakest coder, by date of inexperience.

working to provide a high-quality security update.

By Vomitgod • Score: 3 Thread

thats a fucking joke, right?

Smartphone Market To Shrink 15% This Year Due To Memory Crisis

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
CCS Insight expects global smartphone shipments to fall 15% this year as AI-driven demand pushes memory manufacturers toward higher-margin server chips. "[S]ome entry-level devices have already seen their sticker prices go up by more than 50 percent since last year,” reports The Register. From the report:
The firm found that the primary smartphone market (meaning new devices) contracted 4.4 percent in the first quarter of this year, despite sales channels front-loading (meaning stockpiling) product inventory, as device prices begin to rise sharply. As CCS notes, this casts an ominous shadow on the outlook for the rest of the year, and it seems things have worsened since The Register first started reporting on the smartphone memory woes.

Back in January, the forecast was for handset price rises of 6-8 percent, while the most pessimistic outlook was that the global market might contract as much as 5.2 percent. By February, analysts were expecting to see a decline in shipments of around 8 percent across the global market, and for prices to increase by about 14 percent.

The root cause of all this is the AI craze, which has seen huge demand for high-performance GPU-filled servers to process it all. Chipmakers have moved to capitalize on this by prioritizing production of high-margin memory components for those servers, rather than making the plain old DRAM and NAND needed for PCs and phones.
“The memory chip crisis shows no sign of slowing down in the near future, ramping up the pressure on manufacturers and consumers. Memory components now account for more than 30 percent of a manufacturer’s bill of materials in some smartphones.” said CCS research analyst Ben Hatton. “The full impact has yet to be felt in many regions, but it’s clear that device prices will accelerate over the rest of the year.”

It’s a bubble

By burtosis • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
If there really was a long term market for vastly more chips, the current manufacturing base would have spent the many billions to ramp up production. Instead, they just are selling to the big players for 3-4x the price+ and are neglecting the consumer market hoping they will just make short term money with nothing else changing. Jokes on them though, China is funding internally owned companies to spin up ram production to make up for demand and if it’s successful it will be a thorn in the established companies side forever even if companies find out what a Claude subscription is really going to cost and demand drops.

Re:I just had to replace a phone for a family memb

By Powercntrl • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Elections have consequences and one of them is you don’t get cool electronics anymore.

I know for you politics is like the square hole that everything fits into, but the RAM shortage is just capitalism being capitalism (and you probably know the famous saying that it’s the worst system except for everything else we’ve tried). It’s been explained to death - the RAM manufacturers are worried that if they build more capacity, the AI bubble could pop and then they’d be left holding the bag.

I’m not even sure how you’d fix this situation. Some types of businesses are just extremely expensive to start, which is also why there aren’t like 50 different competitors to Disney World.

And people are keeping them longer?

By p51d007 • Score: 4, Informative Thread
Smartphones are so far ahead of what people use them for, perhaps some are not upgrading every year like they use to. Given the price of the upgrades, inflation and everything else going on, maybe people are keeping them longer too.

Re:I just had to replace a phone for a family memb

By nehumanuscrede • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Left-Wing candidates have been in charge off and on about half the time since
I’ve even been alive and they have yet to do anything other than the typical
politician business-as-usual routine.

They’ve had ample opportunities to " fix " things and have done exactly squat
with it.

PS - Don’t be so quick to throw that " old fart " tag around. Given your Slashdot
ID, you’re already sailing on the edges of those waters as it is.

upgrades were more meaningful

By diffract • Score: 3 Thread
Smartphones have matured enough there is very little incentive to upgrade. Same story with personal computers

Carvana Is Turning Dealerships Into ‘Playgrounds,’ Test-Drive Centers With Sales All Online

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Carvana is testing a radically different new-car dealership model in Dallas, turning the location into a test-drive center and themed “playground" while requiring every purchase to be completed through its online platform. “Every single car that we sell, whether it’s used or new, is online,” said Tom Taira, Carvana president of special projects who’s leading the new vehicle operations. “That’s a very inherent difference. Even coming into the store, you’re buying it online, and that’s a big difference in how people think about it.” The company hopes its no-haggle pricing, hourly employees, service operations, and national logistics network can reshape franchised auto retail. CNBC reports:
Through its used vehicles sales, Carvana has become the most valuable auto retailer in the U.S. with a more than $70 billion market cap. Carvana’s target with the new vehicle business is to grow its market share and customer base as well as assist used vehicle sales through trade-ins and other means, according to Taira. If the company is successful, the strategy could cause a ripple effect across the U.S. franchised dealership model, which the National Automobile Dealers Association reports includes 16,990 retailers that topped $1.3 trillion in sales last year.

[…] Carvana is using a location in Dallas as a test center for its foray into new vehicle sales. The facility looks like a traditional Stellantis dealership from the outside, but the consumer process for purchasing a vehicle and the responsibilities of its employees are unprecedented. Couches and chairs replace cubicles and sales offices. There are no finance and insurance departments, and instead of an army of commission-based employees, the facility has associates that are paid hourly to assist customers — if they want the help.

The experience is meant to be as self-guided as a customer wants. By scanning QR codes located on 10-foot-by-10-foot screens inside the building or on vehicles and displays outside, shoppers can customize a vehicle, learn about a product’s features and conduct test drives before deciding whether to purchase anything. If they do decide to buy something, it’s online and not originated from a sales person, the company said.

The “playground” has roughly 50 vehicles divided by brand, with each having a theme. Jeep has an off-road display. Dodge has race tracks, including a Carvana-themed Charger pace car and part of a traditional track fence barrier. Chrysler minivans, meanwhile, have a soccer net and Ram’s area is truck-centric. Carvana is not committing to expanding the exact experience to its other franchised dealer locations, but Taira told CNBC that the overall process of online sales, vehicle testing and service are expected to be consistent throughout the locations.
Further reading:: Online Car Retailer Launching Nation’s First Car “Vending Machine

Just give me an affordable vehicle …

By Qbertino • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

… that is robust, efficient and that I can maintain and repair myself if the need be. No?
  Ok then, get lost. Thank you.

I like it

By Local ID10T • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

As a consumer, the idea of buying a car without haggling with slimy sales and finance people is enough to make me light headed.

If they can make this work, they have my thanks. IF. They will certainly face severe headwinds from entrenched interests.

Carvana is sketchy as all Hell

By zephvark • Score: 5, Informative Thread

I tried doing business with them twice. Got approved, closed the deal (I thought), and got notified that the deal was canceled days later, before the vehicle was delivered. They claimed they saw some possible fraud in my paperwork, although they wouldn’t explain what. The first time, I’d gone through their own bank and insurance, so I assumed one of them had screwed something up. The second time, using my own bank and insurance… got the same result. My driver’s license is certainly legit, so what else could have gone wrong? They weren’t saying.

I have no idea what kind of scam they’re running but, they don’t seem to be in business to sell cars.

Good, dealer laws need to go

By jacks smirking reven • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

For the obvious reasons that are all being discussed here but in particular car dealers have a tendency to be some of wealthiest business owners in an area and they are overwhelmingly Republican and actively lobby (I think there are a few dealer owners in the House) as well, so for me, if I was in charge in a state reducing their power would be a political imperative as much as a consumer one (really they are intertwined).

  Inside a Key Part of the Republican Base: Car Dealers

Want to Stare Into the Republican Soul in 2023?

For example NADA lobbies over 70% R

https://www.opensecrets.org/industries/indus?ind=T2300

Unsurprised that Stellantis is willing

By argStyopa • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

…they’re fucked.
Their inventory is insanely high. And worse, it’s OLD.

They kept running production full tilt, forcing dealers to take new production AND FORBIDDING THEM offering deals to customers to clear old stocks. They kept trying to sell to the top of the market and nobody’s interested.

So their dealers are closing left and right, going bankrupt because they can’t service the sustain costs on their inventory (they don’t precisely own the cars in their lots) and as few people that are willing to buy a new JEEP for $120k, there’s even fewer willing to pay $120k for a “new” 2024 model that’s been sitting on the lot for 3 years. Drive that off the lot and you don’t lose 30% value, you lose 60% or more.

I’m not in that business, but from what I understand their collapse is a “when not if” proposition. Not shocked that when Carvana looked for someone willing to be their playground, Stellantis was willing and had dealerships that would take anything for some inflow of cash and maybe even customers.

Google, Microsoft, and OpenAI Back Linux Foundation’s Appia AI Standards Initiative

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot
BrianFagioli writes:
Google, Microsoft, OpenAI, Arm, Mastercard, Siemens, and other companies have joined the newly launched Appia Foundation under the Linux Foundation. The project aims to create common specifications and assessment frameworks that organizations can use to demonstrate AI systems meet emerging safety, trust, and compliance requirements. According to the Linux Foundation, the framework is designed to allow conformity evidence to be reused across the AI supply chain, potentially reducing duplicate assessments and compliance costs. The announcement comes as governments around the world move toward enforcing AI regulations and organizations face increasing pressure to prove AI systems are trustworthy.
“As international standards and legal frameworks become more established, global organizations need a consistent, practical way to verify that AI systems conform to new expectations,” said Jim Zemlin, CEO of the Linux Foundation. “The Appia Foundation establishes a neutrally governed environment where the entire industry can collaborate on a common assessment framework. By building this infrastructure in the open, we are helping organizations reduce complexity, lower operational costs and build trust.”
Craig Shank, Executive Director of the Appia Foundation, added: “AI systems now make decisions about people’s loans, their children’s schools and their jobs. People on the receiving end deserve to know those systems were built and assessed against criteria that hold up to scrutiny. The Appia Foundation was formed to do that work: creating publicly available specifications that organizations across the AI value chain use to demonstrate their systems meet those criteria. By establishing this open framework, we are building the accountability layer required to scale safe and trusted AI across major industries.”