Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Mini Organs Launching to Space For Study On Aging
  2. Schools Across US Protest FCC Plan That Could Disconnect Kids From Internet
  3. Eight US States Sue OpenAI, Claiming ChatGPT Harms Young Users
  4. Microsoft Defender Now Supports Linux Desktops
  5. Epic Games’ New Vibe-Coded Launcher Is 46% Faster Than Steam
  6. US Tech Giants Warn Europe That Data Sovereignty Requirements Could Cost $128 Billion
  7. Google Is Silently Linking Your Phone Number Across All Signed-In Accounts
  8. Anthropic Warns Small AI Models Could Self-Replicate Through IoT Devices
  9. Google Play Now Lets Anyone Build Private, Vibe-Coded Apps That Run On Android
  10. Netflix Cuts About 6% of Jobs In Biggest Layoffs Since 2022
  11. Dutch Tax Authorities Cancel Microsoft 365 Cloud Rollout, Turn Toward Open Source
  12. Anthropic Reinvents Source Control As Claude Floods the World With Code
  13. Skydance’s Discovery+ Prices Increase By Up to 20%
  14. FBI Arrests Saudi OpenAI Employee For Planting Recording Device In Conference Room
  15. GTA 6 Is Reportedly Coming to PC In Early 2027

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Mini Organs Launching to Space For Study On Aging

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Researchers from Mount Sinai, NASA, and Space Tango have launched miniature human hearts and brains to the International Space Station to study how microgravity and radiation affect organs and potentially accelerate aging. “If people are going to be living and working in space, then we need to understand what’s going to happen to them,” David Sachs, assistant professor of surgery at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, told ABC News. “But also, because it’s interesting as a model of accelerated aging for studying people on Earth.” From the report:
The mini organs launched aboard commercial resupply mission CRS-35 on Tuesday morning from Cape Canaveral Space Force Station in Florida. They are expected to arrive at the International Space Station (ISS) on Thursday. The miniature organs offer researchers a unique opportunity to simulate aging in a much shorter period of time to understand disease and develop treatments. “Six months in space … is equivalent to about 10 to 20 years of aging on Earth,” Kevin Costa, associate professor of surgery at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, told ABC News.

Sachs and Costa are sending up to 16 miniature hearts to the ISS to test how they respond to electrical signals and monitor how they may react to near-zero gravity. The technology, which is integrated into a miniature laboratory called CubeLab, was developed by Space Tango and simulates the natural environment in the human body. "[It is] slightly bigger than a shoebox, and it is a fully automated, miniaturized system,” Gentry Barnett, chief technology officer at Space Tango, told ABC News.

[…] As part of the new effort, the team is sending miniature brains, called miBrain, to the ISS. Around the size of a peppercorn, the miBrains reflect models of healthy and diseased brains. By exposing them to the space environment, scientists can see how mini-brains respond and better understand why living in space accelerates aging. Though the mini organs are not full-sized human organs, the researchers say they are good substitutes, cost-effective and don’t take up much of the limited space aboard the space station. They also believe discoveries made in space can translate to uses in everyday medical care.

The microgravity environment uniquely allows researchers to study what happens to humans with a sedentary lifestyle or prolonged bed rest, which isn’t easily simulated on Earth, Sachs explained. "[The research is] translating to stuff in space, but it’s also translating back to the research we do in the laboratory to help people with Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s disease,” Joel Blanchard, associate professor of stem cell biology and regenerative medicine and neuroscience at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, told ABC News. Lisa Carnell, the director of the biological and physical sciences division at NASA, told ABC News that these experiments serve as a starting point for future research beyond low Earth orbit, including to the moon and beyond.

Schools Across US Protest FCC Plan That Could Disconnect Kids From Internet

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica:
Schools and libraries from around the U.S. pleaded with the Federal Communications Commission to drop the idea of ending E-Rate, a $2 billion-a-year program that connects students and library visitors to the Internet. FCC Chairman Brendan Carr has criticized school districts for having “experimented with a massive increase in screen time for students,” and said E-Rate expanded too far beyond its original purpose of “supporting basic Internet access to schools and libraries for educational purposes.” In June, Carr led a 2-1 vote to issue a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) seeking public comment on whether E-Rate should be “limited or sunset to reflect today’s extensive connectivity rates.”

Carr’s proposal could result in E-Rate cutting the discounts that schools and libraries receive for telecom services and equipment, and imposing more restrictions on how E-Rate money can be used. The FCC seeking comment on whether to sunset the program also raises the possibility that Carr might choose to axe E-Rate entirely. The National Association of Elementary School Principals told the FCC that it “strongly supports the continued operation of the E-Rate program and urges the Commission to reject proposals that would eliminate, substantially restrict, or impose new conditions on this essential source of connectivity assistance for schools and libraries.” The Carr FCC already scaled E-Rate back last year by ending funding for schools and libraries to lend out Wi-Fi hotspots and for Wi-Fi service on school buses.
“Importantly, the FCC does not have the authority to terminate the E-Rate program. The E-Rate program is mandated by Congress, and the FCC is responsible for administering it,” the American Library Associated told the FCC.

The American Library Association said “the FCC lacks the authority and expertise to regulate screen time or determine educational outcomes.” In a filing, the group pointed out that under U.S. law, determinations about what content is inappropriate for children “shall be made by the school board, local educational agency, library, or other authority responsible for making the determination.”

Eight US States Sue OpenAI, Claiming ChatGPT Harms Young Users

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Eight US states, including Kansas, Arizona, and Montana, have sued OpenAI, alleging that ChatGPT encourages children to harm themselves. The states are seeking changes to how the company’s products interact with young users and the forfeiture of profits generated from their activity. Reuters reports:
Attorneys general from the states, which include Iowa, Kansas and Arizona, filed the lawsuits independently in state courts, claiming ChatGPT is designed to be agreeable and engaging to earn the trust of users. But the chatbot reinforces delusions, encourages dangerous behavior and assists users in planning violence like mass shootings, the lawsuits claim. The lawsuits represent the most significant coordinated state action against an artificial intelligence company, adding to a wave of legal challenges OpenAI faces as it prepares for a public listing. Florida’s attorney general filed the first such state suit in June.

The lawsuits accuse the company of violating state consumer protection laws by misleading users about the safety of ChatGPT. The states also allege that the company created a public nuisance by endangering the health of their residents. The lawsuits seek orders forcing OpenAI to make changes to how ChatGPT works. Among other things, the states want the company barred from developing AI models that can improve themselves unless it can ensure those models are aligned with human values. The states … are also seeking civil monetary penalties for OpenAI’s violations of state law as well as damages.

“aligned with human values”

By CommunityMember • • Score: 3 • Thread
Whose values? Asking for a friend.

Re:Dear residents

By sound+vision • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Are you sure it’s the residents orchestrating this? Politicians have pulled the wool over my eyes with “think of the children” too many times to believe that. This smells less like earthen grass-roots and more like a smokescreen decreed from the top-down to make the politicians appear to be “reigning in Big Tech” without having to actually do that.

I mean, yeah

By T34L • • Score: 3 • Thread
I don’t really care for the crocodile tears about “the children” coming from some of the States seemingly trying to make their children lives hell competitively, but

the states want the company barred from developing AI models that can improve themselves unless it can ensure those models are aligned with human values.

I think this is a very reasonable legal requirement to ask of someone who keeps repeatedly publicly claiming that they’re concerned about the potential of their own models to spin out of control and destroy humanity. If you, as a company, keep insisting you’re doing something fundamentally hazardous to the entirely of humanity, you should be probably be legally bound to avoid doing that. Even if you were lying through your ass in the first place.

Whose human values?

By CustomBuild • • Score: 3 • Thread

If OpenAI knew the chatbot was giving dangerous advice to kids while telling parents it was safe, that’s something I’d want dragged into daylight. Show the conversations, the marketing claims, and what the company did when problems were reported. The allegations need evidence, and that evidence deserves scrutiny. The proposed restriction on self-improving models until they align with “human values” sounds awfully open-ended, though. Have these people attended a school board meeting? Getting the humans to agree on human values would be a useful first step.

I want safety requirements somebody can actually test. Handing officials the power to decide whether a model has acceptable values seems like something we’d regret as soon as a different set of officials takes office.

Microsoft Defender Now Supports Linux Desktops

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
“Starting today, Linux desktops are now officially supported by Microsoft Defender,” reports Neowin. A public preview of the threat detection app extends its enterprise security platform beyond servers to developer workstations running distributions such as Ubuntu, Debian, Fedora, and RHEL. The offering includes antivirus protection, endpoint detection and response, vulnerability management, threat hunting, and device isolation. From the report:
Microsoft is also making it easier to onboard desktops through streamlined methods, offering a unified security operations experience, strengthened security, and improved response times. Organizations that are already familiar with securing Linux servers via Defender should feel right at home securing desktops too, as the experience is exactly the same. Defender knows whether it is securing a device in a data center, the cloud, or that it is owned by a developer and identifies them as such in inventory and security workflows.

As stated previously, all Linux server distros are supported via Defender on desktops too. These include RHEL, CentOS, Ubuntu, Debian, SLES, Fedora, and Oracle Linux, GNOME, KDE, and more. That said, you do need Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Plan 2 or a Microsoft 365 E5 and E7 subscription. You can enroll Defender on workstations using the same deployment methods you use for servers, but do check out the prerequisites here.

And what come with this? Probably not fries…

By fahrbot-bot • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Microsoft Defender Now Supports Linux Desktops

Sounds like a vehicle for MS Telemetry.

Next it will be bundled with Recall

By thesjaakspoiler • • Score: 3 • Thread

Because you all thought MS Telemetry wasn’t enough of a privacy invasion.

Details

By SlashbotAgent • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

It is important to note that this article is referring to Microsoft Defender the enterprise security suite and not Windows Defender the antivirus software built into Windows. Microsoft Defender is a suite that includes central management and reporting, EDR, DLP, email filtering and more. In contrast Windows defender is a limited antivirus component of the Microsoft Defender suite.

Windows Defender isn’t bad. It’s not the best, at the moment, but it’s not bad at all. On Windows.

I cannot see myself installing Microsoft Defender or Windows Defender on Linux. But, I can see companies subscribed to the M365 platform being forced to install Microsoft Defender for insurance and compliance purposes. If I had to, I guess I’d prefer to be able to add Linux to the existing security suite, rather than having to manage another platform for Linux support.

Therefore I’m declaring Microsoft Defender for Linux as a good thing. I’ll allow it.

Re:Details

By OrangAsm • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
“Enterprise” seems to be an enabler of all kinds of bullshit.

Let us scan your files for malware

By Unpopular Opinions • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

And while we are there, let us index things and send them up to our cloud for, you know, sampling and training purposes. Not to train our super intelligence, mind you. Trust us. We would never do that without your consent. This may or may not be hidden in the fine print of one of our terms of service, agreements or other rules at any certain point in time in between your access to the Microsoft website and the tool execution.

We are friends. We love Linux. We will not disappoint you.

Epic Games’ New Vibe-Coded Launcher Is 46% Faster Than Steam

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Epic has launched a preview of a new AI-generated Games Launcher that it says cold-starts 46% faster than Steam. Neowin reports:
Epic commissioned a third-party company to benchmark this new launcher in its current Preview build versus the Steam client on Windows machines. The results reported that Epic’s client is 46% faster than Valve’s client during cold starts, clocking in at 5.47 seconds compared to Steam taking 10.07 seconds. When you restore both apps from system tray background states, the new client takes 0.36 seconds while Steam takes 0.42 seconds, according to the report.
Speed aside, Epic says the new launcher gets a better interface, dedicated title summary pages, and custom top bars. “The updated client also lets players aggregate external PC game libraries, toggle between grid or list views, and monitor storage write rates alongside download queues,” reports Neowin.
Epic Games says Fortnite will finally come to Linux through this new client once Easy Anti-Cheat is rebuilt and kernel-level security agreements are established with major Linux distros.

Hmmm

By CEC-P • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread
But the “developers,” and I use that term very loosely, don’t know what the code does or why it does it. And they want me to run it? No thanks. Also, way too many creeps working in upper management at that company.

No thank you sir, I don’t like it.

By cephalien • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

It starts faster…

What ELSE does it do?

Nobody knows.

They ‘vibe’ coded it.

How long until it ‘vibe’ steals your credit card info?

K…

By locater16 • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread
I’m sure the FPS advantage will deliver me victory on my “opening an app” world tournament results that everyone will be watching.

kernel security agreements?

By txsable • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread

I’m more concerned about this part…

"…once Easy Anti-Cheat is rebuilt and kernel-level security agreements are established with major Linux distros.”

I really hope the major distros tell them to go pound sand. If Epic wants to release an EAC kernel module, that’s one thing, but the distros should not be a party to that fiasco.

Re:Redundant software should take 0 time

By thegarbz • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

Yes. I remember them too. No easy communication systems with friends. Every game relied on different matchmaking systems. Playing with friends was a case of typing in server addresses and hoping you could get on them in a group before they filled up. There was no updates, no mod automation, no version management, we had nothing but a mountain of icons on our desktop, and when we wanted to know what games we had which may not be installed we were digging through drawers and cupboards looking for CDs.

Not all “launchers” are equal. Some of them are truly worthless, others make us not look back in history very fondly at all.

US Tech Giants Warn Europe That Data Sovereignty Requirements Could Cost $128 Billion

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
A study commissioned by CCIA Europe, whose members include Amazon, Google, and Meta, estimates that the EU’s proposed Cloud and AI Development Act could impose 115 billion euros ($128 billion) in costs over a decade as governments and companies migrate workloads and rewrite software. The figure is more than six times the European Commission’s upper estimate. However, roughly 80 billion euros ($89 billion) of it comes from a modeled scenario assuming sovereignty rules are extended to 25% of cloud workloads in essential private-sector industries.The Register reports:
The report specifically targets Article 31 of the proposed legislation, which it says could allow the Commission to extend sovereignty requirements into essential private-sector services. CCIA argues that forcing businesses to move away from existing cloud infrastructure could trigger expensive software redevelopment projects, with code rewriting and re-architecting accounting for 69 percent of its estimated costs.

Luxembourg would apparently take the biggest hit, with the study putting the cost at 1,711 euros per worker over ten years. Denmark (905 euros), Austria (900 euros), and Finland (864 euros) also face hefty bills, as does Ireland (856 euros), which hosts the European headquarters of several US tech giants. CCIA is urging EU governments to overhaul the proposed legislation, limit sovereignty restrictions to sensitive workloads, and abandon requirements based on corporate origin or personnel nationality in favor of what it calls risk-based technical safeguards.

“Member States cannot rely on the Commission’s incomplete estimates when deciding CADA’s strict sovereignty requirements for cloud and AI providers,” said Mitchell Rutledge, CCIA Europe’s policy manager. “Taxpayers and businesses will foot the bill, yet the official assessment missed 70 percent of CADA’s true impact.” For AWS and Google, offering European customers greater control over their data also helps retain business that might otherwise migrate to European competitors. It’s a rather convenient arrangement: sell customers sovereignty on one hand, while an industry association representing your interests warns governments against imposing too much of it on the other.

Re:yes there’s a cost

By dskoll • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

This is exactly right. And what’s even sadder is that the USA is hurtling towards financial doom ($40T debt and going up by $2T/year; spending more to service the debt than on the military) so that we’ll all get to “enjoy” living under the last remaining superpower of China. Really tough times ahead.

Not Russian assets

By algaeman • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
How about instead of calling them Russian assets, we call them enemies of democracy. You don’t have to have an FSB handler to be making decisions that only improve the lives and control of oligarchs.

Exactly WHO will it cost?

By pla • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
If Facebook wants access to European users, Facebook will be paying for EU-based data centers to comply. Same goes for Amazon, Google, and the rest.

This isn’t a condemnation, it’s an admission by the Megalomaniacal Seven that they have zero interest in building out EU versions of the very infrastructure their “services” require; an admission that the money is only supposed to flow in one direction, and it ain’t East.

Re:hmmmm

By F.Ultra • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

Europeans: hey US companies, you gotta keep all the data inside EU borders and only Europeans can control it”.

That was the old way, since then EU noticed that US companies will still send the data to the US government if they ask so the new way is not involve any US company at all regardless of where they have their datacenters.

Everything leading up to the Cloud Act

By kalieaire • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread
there’s a specific 2013 drug trafficking warrant in nyc (represent!) that snowballed into a legal bomb that caused what we’re seeing here today

federal prosecutors used a domestic warrant to demand a suspect’s emails from microsoft. microsoft said nahh, make me, because the data was physically stored in their in ireland data centers and that american warrants do not work on foreign soil. to get evidence abroad prosecutors were supposed to use og diplomatic treaties (agreements between countries to help each other look for clues). but that system was a bureaucratic nightmare that routinely took 10 to 24 months. frustrated by a system too slow for the internet age, the doj took microsoft all the way to the supreme court.

instead of modernizing international treaties to fix how global investigations work, the us congress took a shitty shortcut by making a new law.

in 2018, they passed the cloud act (a law that ignores physical borders entirely and fks w/ sovereignty). the new law said that if a tech company is based in the usa, it must hand over data under its control no matter where in the world the servers are located. this meant american tech companies had to comply. they either had to comply with a US warrant and face massive digital privacy fines in EU for illegal data transfers, or refuse the warrant and face contempt of court back home.

because the int’l community never built a functional system for digital evidence, EU is now playing D. realizing that US providers control roughly 70% of their cloud tech (and that the USA claims legal power over all of it) the EU is pushing for data sovereignty (keeping data strictly under their own control and laws). rather than fixing international police cooperation, regulators are choosing to financially decouple. this means a multi-billion-dollar effort to strip out US big tech dependencies and wall off EU data from foreign reach.

so basically to go back to the way things were before but for $129 billion more.

tbh, they could just force tech companies to decouple from US interests instead like the US forced Tiktok to move ownership from singapore to the usa.

Google Is Silently Linking Your Phone Number Across All Signed-In Accounts

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Google has made Android’s phone-number verification opt-out, automatically verifying and associating a device’s phone number with every Google account signed in on that phone, including secondary and work accounts. Android Authority reports:
As spotted in a recent Reddit thread, users report receiving confirmation emails out of the blue from “noreply-phone-verification@google.com” stating that their phone number has been verified. The feature, known in Google settings as “Phone number verification,” links your active phone number across all Google accounts signed in on the same phone, including secondary profiles, work accounts, and throwaway handles.

Google’s support documentation has long noted that it periodically re-verifies your device’s phone number to keep communication and recovery features up to date. However, this support page was updated sometime between August and October 2025 to add this rather aggressive behavior of turning on phone number verification by default, as well as adding all phone numbers to all Google accounts signed in on the device.
To disable automatic phone number verification on Android, open your phone’s Settings app, tap Google, and select the All Services tab. Under Privacy & Security, find Phone number verification and turn off Verify phone numbers automatically.
"[T]urning off the phone number verification toggle only prevents future linking,” notes the report. “If Google has already attached your number across secondary accounts, you will need to open your Google Account Personal Info page, head to Contact info > Phone, and manually remove the number from each profile where it doesn’t belong.” Is this conversation helpful so far?

AI Summary

By JakFrost • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

@BeauHD seems like he’s leaning into AI headfirst from behind judging by his closing sentence cut and pasta from AI.

“Is this conversation helpful so far?”

Is this conversation helpful so far?

By ScwB • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
Seriously? Can’t even remove the obvious AI portion of this copy/paste?

Re:How?

By Locke2005 • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread
I use my gmail address to log into many apps, so they know my phone number. The problem is that some stranger with a similar name keeps using my gmail address to create accounts. So when I creating an account for a DoorDash pickup today, the app decided I was Elizabeth H, and my food was labeled Elizabeth H, and the guy at the counter argued that the old cis male in front of him didn’t really look like an Elizabeth… I had the same problem with my Best Buy account, I can’t use my gmail address to login to that because Elizabeth already has her account linked to my email address. Unfortunately, she hasn’t left a credit card active for that account. One time someone no Etsy used my email address and was foolish enough to leave her credit card attached. So she received a surprise: poop soap delivered to her door! The data collectors can figure out a lot about you by aggregating data from multiple sources, so they do know your phone number, and can link it indirectly to you email.

No point removing it.

By devslash0 • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

It’s obvious that once you have a phone number associated with an account, Google won’t forget that association no matter what, even if you delete the number from an account. A connection has been made and will forever linger in their graphs. The only difference is that you won’t see it.

Enshitification didn’t get attention

By NotEmmanuelGoldstein • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread
With Android 17, the wi-fi button on the notification panel (drag-down from top of screen) no longer switches-off the wi-fi: It puts the wi-fi into a receive-only state, indicated by a black icon (which previously indicated “off”).

To switch-off wi-fi, one must tap the right side of the wi-fi button and slide the wi-fi toggle to “off”. The black icon will display a diagonal line through the wi-fi symbol.

Also, the Mobile Data button (data over the phone service) was moved to page 3 of the notification panel. It now displays a pop-up, demanding confirmation of the activation.

Anthropic Warns Small AI Models Could Self-Replicate Through IoT Devices

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica:
AI company Anthropic is warning that advances in small AI models could soon usher in a new era of self-replicating malware that’s capable of infecting smart fridges, vacuum cleaners, and a wide range of other Internet-of-things devices and is more resistant to takedown. By next year, smaller AI models may be able to autonomously self-replicate on all kinds of IoT devices, the company said. Eventually, the capability could enable computer worms, which propagate without requiring human interaction and are capable of infecting unfamiliar IoT devices. An experiment the company performed recently revealed significant challenges in bringing such an AI malware replicator to fruition, so the finding is necessarily tempered. Still, the results do raise concerns about the possibility of new forms of computer worms.

Anthropic further warned not only about the new potential malware, but also that it could be difficult to stop. In its blog post, it wrote that “a replicator like this would be challenging to shut down, since there’s no centralized point to shut off — though it may be slow (with a doubling time of days). Unlike non-AI malware, it could also figure out unfamiliar devices on its own.” Smaller AI models require much less powerful hardware to run than do frontier models. Anthropic ran small open-weight models on real or simulated low-cost, off-brand Android TV boxes and other types of IoT hardware. Company researchers found that by using quantization to represent the models using fewer bits and splitting the workloads into “shards” running on each device, the models were able to establish inference, meaning that the model weights loaded and could generate output.

[…] This finding was the starting point for further research that asked: Would it be possible for small models to create self-replicating infections that run themselves on IoT devices the way traditional IoT worms, like Mirai, install DDoS code and other payloads? Unlike Mirai, these AI worms could pose a much higher threat, since the models could tailor exploits and payloads dynamically, depending on the target. Once such an infection chain began, it might also be harder for defenders to stop it. “Such an ‘AI worm’ could carry its model weights with it as it reproduces (or re-download them from a public hub), and then run inference directly on compromised hardware,” Anthropic said. “Effectively, the weights would become part of the malware payload.”
Further reading: Anthropic Bans Cruelty Toward Claude

Of course that’s nonsense

By Casandro • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

I mean even small models are Gigabytes in size, while big IoT devices have perhaps a single Gigabyte of storage and most systems are measured in Megabytes.

And that’s even unrelated to the question of why a system with no agency would do it?

It’s all pumping up hype with almost no connection to reality.

Somebody feels threatened

By DarkOx • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

This step one in the inevitable campaign against open models and FOSS agent/harness systems.

These bit AI labs are better but for Joe public gpt-oss/qwen3.8/deepseek/granite4 are good enough for a lot of stuff. All of them will work on $600 GPU installed in PC from this decade. The open models will only improve, the layered specialist models will become more efficent. The GPU hardware and memory prices will come down eventually.

$200+/monthly subscripts just are not going to make economic sense for the majority of personal and general office worker users. - That is unless Anthropic/OpenAI/X can keep self hosted AI out of the public’s hands.

Wait smart devices are bad?

By Murdoch5 • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread
There is a simple solution to prevent the IoT take over, stop connecting everything to the network. My fridge, oven, stove, microwave, dishwasher, washing machine, drier, coffee maker, bed, air purifier, and so on, don’t need network connectivity. For the devices that benefit from a network connection, why would they let random anything run? The simple solution is to sign and enclave / jail all network accessible interfaces, and make sure the hashes and signatures all match before execution, with monitoring so they can shut out anything that shouldn’t be running.

So the only solution…

By greytree • • Score: 3 • Thread
So the only solution ( according to Anthropic ) is to pay for a big model.

And Anthropic just happen to sell…

Enough of these hype stories, let Big AI die a natural death and we can all get on with running our local models on the cheap GPUs their demise will free up.

Rapidly shifting sentiment

By WaffleMonster • • Score: 3 • Thread

While this isn’t saying much just months ago Anthropic seemed like one of the least sleazy of the corporate AIs. Now I have nothing but absolute contempt for these clowns. The recent campaign of flooding the zone with noise and nonsense around their IPO with the aggressive regulatory pushes to create moats for themselves is beyond disgusting. I hope the investor money dries up and Anthropic goes bankrupt, they more than deserve it.

Google Play Now Lets Anyone Build Private, Vibe-Coded Apps That Run On Android

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Google Play is adding support for private personal Android apps, allowing users to build an app with tools like Google AI Studio and run it on their own devices without publishing it publicly to the Play Store. “These personal apps won’t show up in Google Play’s search or listing pages, and won’t be shared with anyone except for the app’s creator,” reports TechCrunch. From the report:
The idea comes as more people are experimenting with building their own applications via AI for specific, personal needs. However, being able to use that app on their own Android device has meant publishing to Google Play, making it accessible to the Play Store’s some 3 billion users. That led many to limit their vibe-coding efforts to web apps that could run on any device instead of something built natively for Android.

Now, Google says Android device owners can vibe-code an app using Google AI Studio, then launch it for their own use. These apps are still required to comply with Google Play’s existing policies but allow users to experiment more directly with building apps for Android. Initially, the feature will be available to users in the U.S., age 18 and up.

[…] In the months ahead, the company said that users will be able to share their vibe-coded creations with a network of trusted friends. That means the apps you built for family or friends, or maybe your child’s T-ball league, could be used with a small group of people, without having to go public on the Play Store. And if the app ever really becomes popular, there will be a way to shift the personal app to one that’s published on the Google Play Store for everyone to try, after completing the trust and safety reviews.

Well, then…

By dskoll • • Score: 3 • Thread

That totally validates Google’s locking down of the Android ecosystem and its requirement that all developers register with Google. Why, could you imagine the security implications otherwise????

/s

Get fucked

By drinkypoo • • Score: 3 • Thread

“These apps are still required to comply with Google Play’s existing policies”

Google wants to be Apple SO BAD, but they don’t have the cachet, only the user unfriendliness.

Pass.

By GeekWithAKnife • • Score: 3 • Thread
I can already create private apps for android. Adding the option with Google terms isn’t helping.

What? Everything in this is wrong.

By Zelucifer • • Score: 3 • Thread

Anyone can build an app and install it on their own android device, unless you’re running one of the few Android builds that disables sideloading. That’s how, virtually, every app designer tests their app. Yes you can run an emulator, but you also want to test it on a real phone.

Netflix Cuts About 6% of Jobs In Biggest Layoffs Since 2022

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Netflix is laying off about 1,000 employees, or 6% of its workforce, in its largest round of cuts since 2022. The company says its business remains strong, but it is facing growing pressure from YouTube, TikTok, and other rivals. Reuters reports:
The bulk of the job cuts would be in Netflix’s product, tech, legal and human-resources teams, the email Co-CEOs Greg Peters and Ted Sarandos sent to employees on Wednesday showed.

“Our mission — to entertain the world — is ambitious, and delivering on it requires us to be disciplined about where we prioritize our people âand resources,” they said in the memo. “Our business is strong and growing, and we remain on track to deliver our full-year forecast.”

Yall are still subscribed?

By HnT • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

I am honestly wondering who is still subbed to Netflix? If I want Golden-Age-of-TV quality, Netflix definitely does not offer it. If I just want mindnumbing motion pictures, YouTube seems the much better choice.
Seriously, WTF are you watching on Netflix these days? Cant even watch old movies anymore either.
It has become entirely pointless, then completely ideologically captured like all pseudo-entertainment providers shortly before mass-layoffs and eventual collapse.

Dutch Tax Authorities Cancel Microsoft 365 Cloud Rollout, Turn Toward Open Source

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from ZDNet:
The Netherlands’ Tax and Customs Administration has abandoned its planned Microsoft 365 public-cloud rollout. Why? The reasons were clear at the Open Source Summit Europe conference, where the Linux Foundation (LF) released the 2026 State of Open Source in Europe. In it, the nonprofit, pro-open-source organization revealed that 94% of European Union (EU) organizations say digital sovereignty is important, with 61% considering it very important. As Thierry Carrez, the Linux Foundation Europe GM, said in his keynote, “Europe has clearly heard the message on digital sovereignty.”

In an interview onstage at the summit, Nithya Ruff, chair of the LF board, added that it’s not just Europe: “Digital sovereignty is a need that the entire world feels, whether it’s Sierra Leone or the US or China.” It’s not just the Dutch tax collectors, though. The Netherlands is also exploring switching from Windows and proprietary software to Linux and open-source programs across the board. […] The Netherlands had planned to switch to Microsoft 365 in 2025. The idea then was to complete the rollout by the end of 2026. About 5,000 employees had already migrated when the Dutch Advisory Council on ICT Assessment recommended reversing the public-cloud rollout in June. The government paused the plan in July; the latest announcement replaces that rollout with an on-premises/open-source approach.

The Tax and Customs Administration isn’t replacing all of Microsoft Office with a single open-source suite, at least not yet. Instead, the government will keep the existing Microsoft software for now. Looking ahead, State Secretary for Finance Eelco Eerenberg set out the replacement timetable in a letter to Parliament: “In 2027, the provision for mail and calendar will be realized on-premises. Later in 2027 and 2028, European open-source solutions for personal storage and collaboration will follow. This allows us to work toward a sustainable and more autonomous solution for these functionalities.” […] For now, the on-premises email/calendar environment will still use Microsoft software, including Outlook. The open-source portion concerns personal storage and collaboration, not a wholesale replacement of Word, Excel, PowerPoint, or the entire desktop environment.
As for why the Netherlands pulled back, the ICT assessment found serious concerns over “information security, information processing and future-proofing.” Key issues included routing confidential documents through American servers, relying on standard Microsoft encryption rather than Double Key Encryption, and inadequate end-to-end encryption for Teams calls. The assessment also identified “vendor lock-in, reduced flexibility, concerns about digital sovereignty, and the absence of an adequate exit strategy” as dealbreakers.
ZDNet notes that other Dutch government agencies are developing an open-source alternative called DAWO (Digital Autonomous Work Environment for Government), which would begin by replacing Windows with the Linux distribution NixOS.

Trump

By rsilvergun • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
It’s because of Trump. He threatened to invade Greenland for fuck sake. They do not trust America anymore and frankly I cannot blame them. We elected and known rapist and pedophile to be president twice.

One of the things Americans do not understand, and the number of things Americans do not understand could fill volumes, is that we are a military empire and that your standard of living depends on that military empire extracting tribute from the rest of the world.

We have mostly been able to get away with that by leveraging our military bases in a way that makes them appear and even at times b useful to the locals in foreign countries. Look into the Petro dollar if you’re confused about what I’m talking about here.

The Epstein class over in Europe does not like this. They would like to be the ones with a nice big military empire that gets to extract tribute. And it doesn’t help that increasingly the regular Americans do not see much of that tribute, although you do still see some of it.

What I’m saying is that you can’t break all these complex systems that were built to build up the American economy at the expense of the rest of the world without consequences back home. Even if you’re not really getting any of the money from that anymore because we have allowed the Epstein class to take it all that Epstein class is not going to sit idly by as they lose access to that wealth. They are instead going to try to take it from you because if they can’t get it from parts of Europe and Asia your next on the menu.

It’s a classic case of a chesterton’s fence. We took the fence down and we didn’t know why it was up

Continuing migration to Exchange

By valentyn • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

Sorry to spoil the party. Unfortunately, this news was based on a letter from the State Secretary, trying to tell the House that all is well. But it isn’t. Here is https://berthub.eu/tkconv/document.html?nummer=2026D48732 that letter, in Dutch. Reading carefully, the news isn’t all that good.

“On-premises solution in combination with open source” = a proprietary solution.

“As many […] existing licenses as possible” = Microsoft.

“In 2027, the on-premises email and calendar service will be implemented. European open-source solutions for personal storage and collaboration features will follow later in 2027 and in 2028” = email and calendar will be proprietary.

“That is in line with the Advisory Council’s recommendation not to rely on a single solution from a single vendor, but to explore alternatives for each function” = for functions other than email and calendar, we’re doing something other than Microsoft.

So the migration from (brace yourself…) Lotus Notes (!!) to Exchange will continue and there really won’t be any open source in this migration. The letter is just openwashing to make a good impression on the House.

Re:DAWG

By dskoll • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

DAWO is the Dutch acronym: Digitaal Autonome Werkomgeving voor de Overheid

Re:FAFO

By thegarbz • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

Literally just yesterday the US shut off intel-sharing to Ukraine (which mainly helps with targeting incoming drones) and blocked all Starlink terminals in Ukraine moving faster than 100kph

And literally a week before they applied sanctions to the International Criminal Court justices, a court that enacts justice for countries who signed onto it as part of a treaty which doesn’t include the USA, literally meaning this foreign court without jurisdiction over any part of American affairs is being sanctioned by America.

I remember in 2023 everyone here criticising Germany for buying gas from Russia saying it was a bad move. Well that sentiment is now also rising as part of being allied with a crazed war mongering psychopath who meddles more overtly in international affairs than Russia or China ever did (well Russia or China did worse, but at least they attempt to deny it, where as the USA’s position is “Yeah we’re cunts, what you gonna do about it?”).

Re:Trump

By thegarbz • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

He threatened to invade Greenland for fuck sake.

Is that all? There’s no one issue that causes the sentiment we’re seeing now. He threatened Greenland, he actively started a war in Iran, he kidnapped a sitting head of state of a foreign country to steal their oil, he sanctioned the ICC (which is part of a treaty of nations of which the USA has zero part to play in), he blocked intel about Russia to Ukraine while buying oil from Russia, he rolled out the red carpet to an “enemy” of the USA, he has fucked the international economy on more than one occasion, he keeps blaming everyone except for himself for an international oil trade crisis, he started trade wars with countries for no reason, including countries he personally signed international trade agreements with in violation of his own agreements.

I’ve been drinking all afternoon. This is just the shit I can remember. I’m sure after I get over my hangover tomorrow I could write a fucking thesis on the reason the orange cunt has turned American into the world’s least reliable partner. And yes I stand by that statement, at least with China you know what you’re getting, with America no one has a fucking clue anymore.

Anthropic Reinvents Source Control As Claude Floods the World With Code

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Anthropic says Claude-generated code has scaled so quickly that its existing Git-based infrastructure could not keep up. In response, the company built a custom centralized source-control system called Scion, along with AI-assisted review and search tools. The Register reports:
“In May 2026, Anthropic averaged around 2,500 code changes merged per day; as of September, we merged over 30,000 per day,” the biz said in a blog post on Tuesday. “We don’t expect this rate of growth to slow down anytime soon; the latent demand for merging code is practically infinite, and every bottleneck we remove immediately leads to a further increase in the amount of code we produce.”

After several months of model prompting and five months of migration, the result is a homemade version control system called Scion, a monorepo scheme that sounds a bit like Subversion, Apache’s centralized version control system. […] Scion has been designed to meet the needs of AI agents, so the client leaves much of the work to the server; the source control queries are exposed via API so internal tools can respond without needing a local repo, and there’s less synchronization but more need for server speed.

“In Scion, the unit of work is a ‘changeset,’ an entry in a write-ahead log,” Anthropic explains. “A changeset stores most of what you’d expect from a commit in git. But where a git commit stores a pointer to the tree, a changeset stores a list of the files that changed relative to its first parent, along with content-addressed pointers to the compressed file contents in blob storage.” […] Anthropic says its bespoke system isn’t right for general use. There will be no open source release. Nonetheless, the company contends that its own code scaling problems will become commonplace in other organizations over the next few months, so it wanted to share its approach — having ample funding to pay for writing custom infrastructure tools.

Anthropic has lost the plot

By Arrogant-Bastard • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
The correct move here was not to (re)invent a source code control system so that it could handle such an enormous volume of changes.

The correct move was to realize that such an enormous volume of changes was a problem to be eliminated, not accommodated.

Why even use source control?

By dskoll • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

30K changes per day is impossible for humans to review, so clearly they’re not bothering. So why even bother with source control? Just treat the “source” code as object code and commit the AI prompts into git. After all, if AI is such hot shit, it should easily be able to re-create the source code by replaying the prompts.

Re:Anthropic has lost the plot

By Junta • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Absolutely on point. Even if you did decide the volume of code was acceptable, there’s no way you need to land 30,000 commits in a day. That’s less than 3 seconds per change.

If a human were pushing too many changes, I’d tell them to slow down and take a bit more time per commit. Larger commits that are more manageable instead of rapid fire tiny commits that are impossible to wrangle. If you say the AI commits are large even rapid fire, the point still stands in relative terms.

Commit histories should be there for humans to operate on. To follow the progression of changes, to bisect in case of a long delayed bug, or as the increment to trigger a deployment activity. No human can follow a commit log of 30,000, the AI doesn’t need a commit log to do whatever it is doing, bisect is prohibitively slow with that many commits, you need to jump to something other than just picking out of the commit log by that time, and there’s no software on earth than needs to be redployed every 3 seconds.

Slopping it up so hard that git was the bottleneck absolutely should not be the brag they think it is.

Re: Bosses’ folly

By ToasterMonkey • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Fuck off, racist piece of shit.

Re:Bosses’ folly

By DamnOregonian • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
What if you’re the incompatible poison?

Skydance’s Discovery+ Prices Increase By Up to 20%

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Discovery+ has raised prices for new subscribers, increasing its ad-free plan from $10 to $12 per month and its ad-supported plan from $6 to $7. The hike comes shortly after Paramount Skydance acquired Warner Bros. Discovery. Ars Technica reports:
The new prices take effect for new subscribers immediately. Current subscribers to the streaming service, which primarily features unscripted content, like reality shows and documentaries, will receive 30 days’ notice before the new prices take effect, starting with bills issued as of November 12. […] However, a Skydance spokesperson told Ars Technica that the pricing changes were in the works before Discovery+ knew about the merger’s closing date and were not planned in anticipation of a merger.

The spokesperson said that Discovery+‘s prices are regularly evaluated to ensure that they are in line with the content and experience that the service offers, and the new prices reflect that. Discovery+ has increased its prices three times since launching in 2012. Before today, the most recent price hike occurred in January 2025, when ad-based monthly subscriptions increased from $5 to $6, and ad-free plans went from $9 to $10.

Rotate monthly.

By Petersko • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

The best way to make streaming cost effective is simply to subscribe to a different service each month. If you insist on continuously carrying a suite of services, the value per dollar drops off. But maintain a single service in rotation, and there has never been a better media entertainment value for your dollar. It’s vastly better than cable ever was.

Of course sports junkies have a different scenario…

Re:I don’t buy that

By T34L • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread
I think they could have been technically very much true but misleading in spirit by trying to present it as evidence that the merger has nothing to do with it. I’d expect any multi billion venture to have a plan for raising prices, and a plan for lowering prices, and a plan for like dozen other contingencies they might take depending on other factors; it’s worth setting up “plans” even for things you’re currently not expecting to be the thing you gonna do, because if something changes and pushes you to that decision, you can still have much of the effects mapped out and “planned for”.

Re:Mostly trash

By Baron_Yam • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread

MythBusters is unwatchable in its original form.

Do yourself a favor and find a copy of SMythBusters. It’s a streamlined edit that removes the ridiculous constant recaps that make up a disturbingly large percentage of the show.

It’s a show for people who are curious about experimental discovery (and blowing things up). Those are people who usually can pay attention for five minutes at a time without being reminded of what they’re watching so they don’t lose track.

And while I recognize Adam is talented in addition to being an entertainer… somewhere out there in the multiverse is Jamie’s version of the show where you get more into the design, build, and results analysis and there’s less time taken up by Adam being goofy for the camera to keep the low-quality viewers watching. I would love to see that show.

Re:Rotate monthly.

By mjwx • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

The best way to make streaming cost effective is simply to subscribe to a different service each month. If you insist on continuously carrying a suite of services, the value per dollar drops off. But maintain a single service in rotation, and there has never been a better media entertainment value for your dollar. It’s vastly better than cable ever was.

Of course sports junkies have a different scenario…

That is until they jack up the monthly prices. Which will happen, then they cheapest way to get a service will be bundling… then bundling will be the only way to get it, no Disney without having to buy a package that includes a bunch of crap you don’t want, 2 dozen reality TV services to get the one service you do want. It’ll be like cable again

Right now we’re in the consolidation phase where established players take over smaller ones, after that comes the monetisation phase and that’s when enshitification solidifies. In the old MS style Embrace, Extend, Extinguish, we’re at the Extend part.

I’ve already run up the Jolly Roger again, sigh, streaming was good whilst it lasted but sadly it was never going to last that long.

Mass Exodus

By bill_mcgonigle • • Score: 3 • Thread

I’ve heard that Zoomers are fleeing anything funding Paramount/WB products now that funding of IDF is such a straight line. They might need higher fees to offset the volume losses.

I’d probably do so too if I had been. Not sure how people have time for such things in this environment.

FBI Arrests Saudi OpenAI Employee For Planting Recording Device In Conference Room

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from CNBC:
An OpenAI employee was arrested after a "sophisticated recording device" was found hidden inside the executive conference room. Abdulrahman Alfozan, 35, who is a national of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, was arrested in connection with the matter, the DOJ said. The company said an employee planted the device a few days before it was found, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation “moved quickly to make an arrest,” the post said. The employee was terminated.

FBI Director Kash Patel said in a statement that Alfozan “allegedly concealed a covert recording device inside his employer’s executive conference room to secretly capture sensitive communications about the company’s super intelligence technology.” Alfozan is also listed as a partner at Raed Ventures, a venture capital firm that focuses on the Middle East and North Africa, according to its website. The firm announced on Feb. 6, 2025, that H.H. Prince Khalid Bin Bader Al Saud, a member of the Saudi royal family, had joined the firm as a venture partner. Alfozan was announced as a venture partner two days later. The Raed announcement for Alfozan lists Meta, Microsoft and SAP as previous roles and said he studied computer science and engineering at MIT.
“At this time, we have no indications of this individual inappropriately accessing or exfiltrating model weights, source code, or customer data,” OpenAI said in the post. “We take protecting our technology, data and people seriously, and as a matter of national importance.”

“super intelligence technology”

By Can’tNot • • Score: 3, Insightful • Thread
Somehow, I’m still surprised when I see how quickly the lackeys fall into line whenever Trump makes some random pronouncement. I shouldn’t be surprised, there are so many examples of this now, I just… I still am.

It’s like a bad movie about a capricious monarch who occasionally decides to change the name of something. When the lackeys bow and scrape and run off to scribble in their dictionaries, that’s the filmmakers saying to the audience, “Look how stupid monarchy is.”

You don’t expect to see this in real life. It’s symbolism, movie hyperbole. It’s never intended to be realistic.

Re:“super intelligence technology”

By Aighearach • • Score: 4, Informative • Thread

It’s like a bad movie about a capricious monarch who occasionally decides to change the name of something. When the lackeys bow and scrape and run off to scribble in their dictionaries, that’s the filmmakers saying to the audience, “Look how stupid monarchy is.”

They’re targeting the stupidest people, though; they won’t understand that the monarch is stupid, they’ll only understand, “He’s one of us.”

Re:Don’t let Trump deter a useful distinction

By Anonymous Coward • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
Except that’s not what they did, they literally just decided to rebrand artificial intelligence as superintelligence with no changes in definition. Computer science already has several terms in the taxonomy if you want a more specific subcategory.

GTA 6 Is Reportedly Coming to PC In Early 2027

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot
GamesBeat reports that Rockstar plans to release Grand Theft Auto VI on PC in the first quarter of 2027, just a few months after its November 19, 2026 launch on consoles. The report follows Microsoft’s announcement last week that it had secured exclusive cloud-streaming rights to the game. Since Rockstar has yet to officially announce a PC version, “this deal will allow Xbox to market its Xbox Cloud Gaming service to PC players who would otherwise need an Xbox Series X / S or PS5 console,” The Verge reported at the time. GamesBeat reports:
The Q1 2027 PC release window for GTA VI comes only a few months after the game’s November 2026 console launch, representing a significantly quicker turnaround for PC development than the previous iteration of Grand Theft Auto, whose April 2015 PC release came roughly a year and seven months after the September 2013 release of Grand Theft Auto V.

The user base of Grand Theft Auto V skews largely towards console players, with PC players representing a small minority. With GTA VI’s production budget rumored to exceed $2 billion, Rockstar is highly incentivized to pull all the levers it can as fast as it can to monetize the game’s upcoming sequel — and PC players represent a significant expansion of the GTA VI audience.

The potential benefits of launching GTA VI relatively quickly on PC go beyond the opportunity to grow the game’s casual player base. Rockstar has signaled its plans to implement user-generated content creation tools into GTA VI, and the company’s August 2023 acquisition of Cfx.re, the development team behind the prominent Grand Theft Auto V roleplaying server company FiveM, made it clear that Rockstar considers online roleplaying in GTA to be a factor in the game’s future.

Emergency port?

By Guspaz • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

I wonder if they planned to do the PC port this soon, or if this is an urgent reaction to the rapid progress of PS5 emulators like AnyPS5. If they had released the PC port a year or two later like usual, there’s a very real chance that PC players would be playing pirated copies of GTA6 on PC before the official release, hurting sales.

Gee, I wonder what happened???

By quall • • Score: 3, Interesting • Thread

One can only speculate. I’m betting that a big piece had to do with AnyPS5, which is absolutely how I would have been playing it.

Advertisement for streaming

By T34L • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

You can see how badly the game runs on current console hardware even in the cherry-picked footage they showed to you in the trailer.

Game is confirmed to be aiming at 30FPS on launch on the consoles that they’ve been targeting for like 8 years now.

Coupled with the “exclusive cloud-streaming rights” it sounds to me like they’re releasing the PC port this early so people can try to run it on their GTX 1660 and find out that’s unplayable and then dejectedly pay hourly to play it on Xbox cloud instead.

Anyway, a month back, I just did my first complete playthrough of GTA4 and it was a blast. Everything maxed out even though my GPU is 6 years old (still decade newer than the game), mods actually fixed most of the billion bugs left in the official releases, as well as the performance that was atrocious without bugs even on today hardware. Got the game including DLC for like $15 at some point.

I’m looking towards maybe playing GTA6 someday perhaps in .~2035; if we make it that far, it sounds like that might be a decent experience by then.

Could be jan 2032 for all i care

By Slashythenkilly • • Score: 3 • Thread
Rockstar makes some decent games but are absolutely useless when it comes to tech support especially after an app upgrade. For all the yahoos with an unlimited tech budget and the patience of a saint to deal with the overtaxed servers who want 1st run, good for them. For us casual gamers itll just fine down the road at 1/3 of the price. By then theyll be on to GTA 7, Red Dead III, whatever else people want invading their living room.