Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Whatever Happened to the 150,000 Tons of Radioactive Waste Stored Under the Atlantic Ocean?
  2. Andreessen Horowitz Launches AI/Company-Building School As a College Alternative
  3. Bitcoin Surges to $86,455, an 8-Month High, After America’s SEC Announces Tokenized Stock Experiment
  4. Microsoft Helps Take Down Massive Automated, AI-Powered Phishing-as-a-Service Platform
  5. Trump Denounces Attempts to Control AI, Wants It Renamed ‘Super Intelligence’ in US Documents
  6. Are Students Suddenly Losing Interest in Computer Science as AI Coding Takes Off?
  7. ‘Coyote vs. Acme’ Outgrosses All But 3 WB Movies This Year, Heads To Profit
  8. Pentagon Investigators Say Overreliance on Palantir AI Contributed to US Strike That Killed 123 Iranian Children
  9. Google Opens Preorders for Its $899 Gemini-Enhanced ‘Googlebook’ Laptops
  10. Meta’s New ‘Personal AI Agent’ Muse Beats ChatGPT in Downloads - and Get Blocked by Amazon
  11. Paramount Skydance ‘Emerges Victorious’, Finally Wins Settlement for Warner Bros Takeover
  12. As KDE Turns 30, Contributors and Commits are Going Strong
  13. Are Book Publishers Warming Up to the AI Industry?
  14. Australia Considers Smart Glasses Ban in Government Workplaces, While 70 People Sue Meta Over Unknowing Data Collection
  15. North Korean Hackers Posed as Recruiters. They Infected 30,000 Devices Worldwide

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Whatever Happened to the 150,000 Tons of Radioactive Waste Stored Under the Atlantic Ocean?

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
More than 200,000 barrels of low-level radioactive waste were stored on the floor of the Atlantic Ocean between 1949 and 1982, reports ScienceAlert.

Whatever happened to those barrels?
Scientists have descended to the wreckage in a crewed submersible to investigate — and found many of the barrels corroded and degraded, their contents spilling across the seafloor. Surprisingly, this isn’t necessarily a subversion of the original plan… The International Atomic Energy Agency recommends that low-level waste be disposed of in robust containment in isolation for at least a few hundred years — but back in the mid-20th century, the recommendations were a little different. The contemporaneous guidelines recommended that containers needed to reach the seafloor intact and remain sealed only long enough for the short-lived radionuclides to decay. After that, the remaining waste was expected to slowly escape and disperse through the surrounding ocean. Not everything in the barrels would conveniently decay away, however. They contained a radioactive hodgepodge, including cesium-137, plutonium isotopes, and tritium, some of which can persist for thousands of years…

[A] few years ago, nuclear engineer Patrick Chardon and marine geologist Javier Escartín of the French National Center for Scientific Research started to wonder what had become of the dumped waste. That question eventually became NODSSUM — Nuclear Ocean Dump Site Survey Monitoring — an interdisciplinary project bringing together nuclear physics, geology, oceanography, biology, and marine chemistry to find the barrels and investigate what, if anything, they were doing to the surrounding environment.... [T]he barrels also appeared to function as tiny oases on the otherwise sparsely populated sandy seafloor. Anemones had attached themselves to the barrels. Sponges, sea cucumbers, fish, and crustaceans lived around them, with crabs apparently particularly fond of the artificial shelters

Instruments aboard the ship detected significant signals of cobalt-60 and niobium-94, which the researchers could specifically link to the dumped waste… [Samples are now being analyzed] There is precedent, however, to suggest that even striking levels of radioactivity around a source don’t necessarily spread very far. A recent study of the sunken Soviet submarine Komsomolets found radionuclide levels hundreds of thousands of times above background immediately around the leaking reactor — but those levels dropped sharply within just a few meters as the material dispersed through the seawater. The NODSSUM team similarly found that, despite the significant radioactive signals around the barrels, activity levels weren’t high enough to pose major radiation-protection problems for the scientists handling the samples. [Their three-person submersible] Nautile and the instruments it carried showed no signs of contamination.
The real achievement was mapping the exact location of the barrels. “None of this means the waste is harmless,” the article concludes — but it also doesn’t mean we’re about to be overrun by radioactive crabs.”

At least some of the links are paywalled

By 93 Escort Wagon • Score: 3 Thread

Including the Le Monde story about crabs using the containers as artificial shelters.

Fortunately I found there’s at least one picture of this on Wikipedia.

Andreessen Horowitz Launches AI/Company-Building School As a College Alternative

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
TechCrunch quipped it was like if startup school Y Combinator and Peter Thiel’s build-a-company-instead of-college Fellowship Program had a baby. Silicon Valley venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz is investing $35 million to launch a private school in San Francisco “aimed at turning high school graduates into founders,” writes the SF Standard.

Or, as CBS News describes it, “One blue-chip Silicon Valley investor has a proposal for young people who are questioning whether to attend college — enroll in AI school instead....”
Specifically, the academy will provide instruction geared to subjects such as designing AI systems, fundraising for startups, selling businesses and storytelling. Students won’t take tests or be assigned homework but will instead focus on building real projects. Courses will be taught by tech entrepreneurs, with the academy naming OpenAI CEO Sam Altman as either an instructor or guest lecturer.
From the SF Standard:
“There will be no traditional grades, tests, or homework,” said the announcement. Instead, students will be encouraged to “build” in SF and work with partners from Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, Meta, and other firms. They’ll be encouraged to live in campus housing in San Francisco. “The #1 goal is to help students learn to build, which is the most important skill in the AI era,” Gagan Biyani, chief executive of the academy, wrote on X. Biyani cofounded the ed-tech startup Udemy…

The school is opening applications for a Founding Class Fellowship a one-year, tuition-free program for around 50 students… The academy said it will bring in notable Silicon Valley names, like OpenAI’s Sam Altman, as guest speakers and faculty. Students in the founding class will receive about $50,000 worth of computing credit — the sought-after currency in Silicon Valley to run AI models — as well as a $5,000 travel and research budget. The school is receiving funding from tech executives, including Fidji Simo, formerly of OpenAI and Instacart; Garry Tan, CEO of Y Combinator; and Tobi Lütke, CEO of Shopify.
“In the AI era, it’s more important to come out with a portfolio of projects that you worked on and work experience than it is to have a diploma or certificate,” Biyani told the San Francisco Chronicle:
Biyani said the academy plans to grow its enrollment and open a two-year program, pending regulatory approval, starting in the fall of 2028. Tuition is expected to be on par with the cost of an elite private university…
The academy raised $42 million in funding led by Andreessen Horowitz. The ten founding partners are Anduril, Anthropic, Coinbase, Google, Meta, Nvidia, OpenAI, Palantir, Replit and Stripe. A network of hundreds of instructors, hiring partners and guest speakers includes OpenAI co-founder Sam Altman, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang, neuroscientist Andrew Huberman and Microsoft chairman and CEO Satya Nadella, according to the academy’s website.

The FAQ describes a typical week by saying “Most of your time is yours to build. Each week, you share your progress with peers and practitioners, get direct feedback, and decide where to take your work next.”

Q: Can I use AI to help with my application?

A: Yes. Use AI the way you’d use it on any project: to move faster, test ideas, and get past a blank page....

“The best assignments now are problems so hard they cannot be solved without AI,” Andreessen Horowitz argued on X.com. “The Academy courses follow the same logic and will be taught by world-class leaders… The next generation will not be taught the way the last one was. The Academy is built for that world, and it begins in San Francisco.”

Thanks to long-time Slashdot reader theodp for sharing the news.

Trading Grades for Slaves.

By geekmux • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

“There will be no traditional grades, tests, or homework,” said the announcement. Instead, students will be encouraged to “build” in SF and work with partners from Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, Meta, and other firms. They’ll be encouraged to live in campus housing in San Francisco.

“Encouraged” sounds a lot like mandated here. Speak honestly and clearly. Attendees either have a choice, or they do not.

I wonder how quickly those “founders” will realize all of a students rights to any “encouraged” ideas, designs, or products will be owned by the actual founders here.

You’re more like..founder fodder.

Re:Vibe education

By stabiesoft • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Don’t kid yourself. This is a way for wealthy people to meet wealthy people that are connected to the VC world. The price is a gate to keep the undesirables out.

Let’s burn some karma here

By jenningsthecat • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Specifically, the academy will provide instruction geared to subjects such as designing AI systems, fundraising for startups, selling businesses and storytelling. Students won’t take tests or be assigned homework but will instead focus on building real projects.

I see this as mere indoctrination. Those who “succeed” after the course will support and renew the next generation of elitist anti-democratic oligarchic parasites ruining our societies and our planet. Those who make it all the way to the end and then don’t end up as high-profile founders may nevertheless have been brainwashed into the master-slave mindset of the broligarchs. Those who drop out may or may not be useful members of society.

This isn’t education at all - it’s sane-washing, brain-washing, and hand-waving. Fuck Marc Andreessen and his fellow misAnthropic tech bros - not gently, sideways, and with a running chainsaw.

Nintendo Digitech 2.0

By hutkept • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Years ago, back in 2002, when I was looking at different colleges to go to, I had my heart set on writing video games for a living. I looked at and toured several universities, but one of them was Digitech up in Seattle. A lot of their graduates went to work at Nintendo, but the school taught you how to make video games in various languages, C/++, etc…, graphics drivers, etc…, all circa 2002. The building was a small squat little thing, and the school community was very small. There was a lack of diversity, a lack of culture, and a lack of exposure to the larger world that I immediately experienced when I visited the larger traditional university campuses. University isn’t just about what is taught or how, but also what your other college peers are being taught, what is going on around you, alongside you, and not just the explicit skill you end up with at the end. These smaller places fail to be immersive and are always very focused on a narrow band of related vocational skills. For me, it felt limiting and like I would have been missing out on the wider world.

Re:Sounds like a very bad idea

By nospam007 • Score: 4, Funny Thread

“But I am sure some people will think this is just excellent and they totally have to do it.”

A bit like Trump university.

Bitcoin Surges to $86,455, an 8-Month High, After America’s SEC Announces Tokenized Stock Experiment

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
August 15: $62,991
September 23: $86,456
Bitcoin shot up 37% over the last 39 days, reaching an eight-month high on Monday. “Bitcoin is back,” declares Yahoo Finance:
The token held near $86,000 on Tuesday after a stunning multisession rally… [Fundstrat head of digital assets Sean Farrell told Yahoo Finance on Monday] “I think the crypto winter is over, although that does not necessarily mean the path higher will be linear.” For now, momentum is on crypto’s side, with bitcoin jumping more than 5% on Friday and another 6% on Monday. “We believe crypto is in the early innings of a new bull market and we see few signs of overheating,” Compass Point analyst Ed Engel wrote on Tuesday.

The move looks “like a combination of renewed ETF demand and a large short squeeze,” Nicolai Søndergaard, senior research analyst at Nansen, said as traders betting against bitcoin are forced to buy it back, adding further fuel to the rally.
Bitcoin got bad news and then good news last week. After the U.S. Congress failed Thursday to pass a cryptocurrency ‘Clarity Act’, America’s Securities and Exchange Commission instead announced a tokenized-stock experiment. It’s a five-year “innovation exemption” that “creates a path for tokenized U.S. stocks to trade through automated market makers on public blockchain,” according to CoinDesk. Yahoo Finance notes that Bitcoin and other altcoins surged after the announcement.

shakes head

By evanh • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Some people clearly still have too much money.

Re:Bitcoin is obsolete and should not be used

By martin-boundary • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Bitcoin is also a great way for Trump to benefit.... and for Iran to do commerce outside the dollar system.

Re:And still no Epstein Files

By sabbede • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
You got on the pyramid early. Is it hard to recognize it for what it is from up there?

Re:Bitcoin - victim of its own success

By Sloppy • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

its advocates have already gotten so much of what they could have possibly hoped for

Except the one thing that actually matters: being able to really use it. I still (in 2026!) can’t use Bitcoin to pay for things at my local grocery store, car mechanic, or even Amazon.

Bitcoin didn’t take off. Unless it suddenly gets more popular by a few orders of magnitude, it remains a useless dead end.

Re:This just in - Trump Grifts some more

By drinkypoo • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Most people didn’t choose that part of this consciously, because they didn’t understand it, and if they did, they didn’t believe it.

What I don’t get is how those people can think they’re smart when the counterevidence is so persistent.

Microsoft Helps Take Down Massive Automated, AI-Powered Phishing-as-a-Service Platform

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Microsoft’s security blog describes the fight against a new "AI-powered cybercrime platform" offering phishing-as-a-service, with AI-tailored lures and analyses of compromised inboxes (to identify high-value targets). The site compromised more than 12,000 inboxes in over 10,000 organizations around the world, compromising business accounts “at scale” with automated attacks and prebuilt phishing templates. AI tools could even sift through a victim’s mailbox to help engineer better phishing messages.

To disrupt EvilTokens Microsoft worked with other organizations, including Cloudflare, Coinbase, OpenAI, Railway, SpyCloud, Shadowserver Foundation, and TRM Labs to Health-ISAC (a non-profit helping health sector organizations share cyber threat information).

“Fifty sites seized and 150 domains disabled in a single action is only possible when the hosting providers, the exchanges, the model providers and the data holders all move at the same time,” security company SpyCloud told The Hacker News.

From Microsoft’s security blog:
Microsoft also notified affected customers, helped remediate compromised accounts, and shared intelligence to support further defensive and investigative action… Microsoft worked closely with specialist officers from the Metropolitan Police Service’s cybercrime team, sharing intelligence that enabled officers to take operational action in the United Kingdom. On September 11, 2026, officers arrested two men, aged 32 and 38, and seized digital devices and other items for examination… While EvilTokens used AI to identify targets and prioritize fraud opportunities, Microsoft investigators used reverse engineering and AI-powered tools to analyze evidence, accelerate the investigation, and identify the infrastructure supporting the service…

Campaigns leveraging EvilTokens have impacted organizations in various industries, including wholesale distribution, construction, financial services, real estate, higher education, and healthcare, with the highest concentrations of observed victim activity in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Australia, India, and France. Working with partners, Microsoft’s Digital Crimes Unit (DCU) facilitated a coordinated disruption of infrastructure used to operate the EvilTokens service.
Sometimes stolen tokens were used to give new devices access to a victim’s inbox. (A code authenticating the new device was sent to the targeted user, who unknowingly authorize the threat actor’s session and grants access to their account…) But “AI was not simply helping attackers write more convincing messages,” says another Microsoft blog post. “It helped them decide who to target, who to impersonate, and how to most effectively exploit the relationship to extract as much money as possible.”
The significance of EvilTokens extends beyond its rapid growth and global reach. It offers an early warning of what happens when cybercriminals combine stolen access with AI capable of understanding how an organization works… Its AI tools could summarize and translate emails, surface financial conversations, map organizational roles, identify trusted relationships, and recommend potential targets. Preset prompts offered to find wire-transfer discussions, identify the organization’s “money movers,” locate vendor invoices, and determine the best people to impersonate. Sold through Telegram for a $1,500 initiation fee and a recurring $500 subscription, EvilTokens combined account compromise, mailbox analysis, target selection, and fraud preparation in a single service. Capabilities that once required experience across identity attacks, cloud systems, social engineering, and financial fraud were available through a ready-made interface.

Investigators found evidence that large portions of EvilTokens had been “vibe coded,” with AI helping its creators build the platform itself. They also determined that EvilTokens drew on capabilities from multiple AI models. The result was more than a collection of attack tools. EvilTokens packaged much of the fraud process into a commercially run service, complete with subscription pricing, customer support, management dashboards, and tools designed to move customers from account access toward financial exploitation.

Um …

By fahrbot-bot • Score: 5, Funny Thread

AI-Powered

I think you mean, SI-Powered /s (*heavy-sigh*)

uh

By drinkypoo • Score: 3, Funny Thread

Microsoft is an Automated, AI-Powered Phishing-as-a-Service Platform. The service is provided to the US Government.

Changes Over Time

By SlashbotAgent • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Microsoft email: Never before have there been so many Microsoft email security measures. Never before has email been so inconvenient for the end user due to Microsoft security measures. Never before Microsoft Exchange Online have there been so many breached email accounts.

It’s kind of staggering. Like watching more people pile onto an overloaded, decrepit, sinking Thai boat, and then acting surprised when it sinks of capsizes.

Every other month, a new improved security system. Strong passwords, password rotation, MFA, phish resistant MFA, conditional access policies, passwordless, passkeys… ‘This one will rule them all.’ Yet, every day we see more Business Email Compromises(BEC) on Microsoft’s platform than ever before.

Nobody is talking about breaches at GMail, AOL/Yahoo, Apple, cPanel, and self hosted servers. It’s always Microsoft. Hmmm.

Trump Denounces Attempts to Control AI, Wants It Renamed ‘Super Intelligence’ in US Documents

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
U.S. President Trump addressed the United Nations on Tuesday. And a half hour in, after decrying immigration, Trump pivoted to add that “The United States also totally rejects any attempt to construct a globalist scheme to control for the artificial intelligence being spoken of so much now.”

But then he added “hereinafter officially called super intelligence, changing the name, in that the use of the word artificial makes intelligence fake. It makes it sound fake, and it is not fake. It’s actually… amazing. But we have to be careful — in fact, it is exactly the opposite of what it purports. From this point forward, all of United States documents and hopefully the world’s will be changed to use the much more accurate term super as opposed to artificial. So it’s super intelligence.”
TRUMP: In other words, welcome to the new world of super intelligence — SI. SI. Let’s see if that goes. It sounds much better. It is much better, and it’s much more accurate. Let’s see if I have any power. Maybe I do and maybe I don’t. We’re going to find out pretty soon. Super intelligence.

Every major new technology brings challenges, and super intelligence is no exception. Yet the very same people who said we’ll all be dead in 12 years because of global warming, a name since reborn to climate change because the planet was cooling not warming, and nobody was dead — these are the same people that are now saying that AI is going to kill us all. That robots are going to attack us, and that everything is going to be a total disaster — same group of people. This is the group that came up with the Russia Russia Russia hoax, the Ukraine Ukraine Ukraine hoax. Climate change, open borders.

Whoever wins AI — you have to remember this — and now I say, whoever wins SI, whoever wins super intelligent [sic] — wins. That’s the group that wins. And we’re leading now over China by a lot, and everyone else, and we’re going to keep it that way. We’re going to keep it very — very straight and very strong. I’m not going to stifle growth of something that will be bigger than the Industrial Revolution. Many say, bigger than the Industrial Revolution or the internet itself.

And we will be very careful, and that’s why we have a Department of Justice that we’ve already used it, having to do with this very subject, and used it very powerfully. Everything worked out very well and very quickly. And other law enforcement bodies that will rein things in if we have to do that.

But we will only encourage super intelligence. We’re gonna encourage it, not rein it in. We’re gonna watch it closely, through the Department of Justice. The United States leads the world in Super Intelligence, and will continue to do so, safely and responsibly.
Thanks to long-time Slashdot reader ArchieBunker for suggesting the story.

Re:super

By Creepy • Score: 5, Funny Thread

It’ll be American Intelligence in just a couple of hours. From Planet America, in the American Galaxy after the Big Bang of America Truth.

Re:super

By fahrbot-bot • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Well then, we should be moving on to super duper intelligence.

Next: LI - Ludicrous Intelligence

Re:What a load of shit

By gtall • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

His own party doesn’t have the balls to distance itself from that mutant. A few peripheral pols have suddenly realized they were losing coming up to the midterms and have been makes noise, nothing more, about how the Epstein-Iran war must end, or that tariffs must end. Oh, when precisely are these endings suppose to occur?

Maggot Mike as sent the House home because he doesn’t want a vote on impeaching our alleged Sec. of Christian War Crimes. And conveniently, they cannot vote on anything more embarrassing. Meanwhile, after passing the Epstein law for releasing the documents, you never a hear a peep out of them while la Presidenta stonewalls any release.

One of the latest developments in the papers case brought by Katie Phang is that Judge Sullivan ordered the foreign language documents in the papers be translated forthwith and turned over to him. He could release them if he saw fit. Our alleged Justice Dept. told the judge they couldn’t because they didn’t have the personnel (he shot that down) and now they have some other excuse. He said bullshit and ordered they be translated. The alleged JD filed for a stay, he denied it, but gave those goomers 2 days to file an appear before the D.C. Appeals Court. Three judges from that Court will be chosen to hear the appeal. Of that Court, three are la Presidenta bootlickers. If two of them get chosen, those assholes will get to kick the can down the road further thus further delaying any justice for the victims. The papers to be translated name names of those who used Epstein’s “services”. There’s a good chance la Presidenta is named there.

Re:Loss of contact with reality

By Sloppy • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Blaming Wharton School of Business for what Trump tried to do with the Gulf of Mexico and Lake Ontario is absurd. By all accounts, he didn’t learn anything in his time there and his professors didn’t think highly of him. There’s no way his university had anything to do with that.

Besides, lots of people graduated from Wharton. Which others, who graduated from there, suffer from Trump’s derangement syndrome and a need to rename geography?

Re:Wow, I didn’t expect *that*

By omnichad • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Super High Intelligence of Trump

Are Students Suddenly Losing Interest in Computer Science as AI Coding Takes Off?

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
On academic mentoring platform Nova Learning, Computer Science and AI, “once the dominant choice among students… is losing ground fast, while Engineering has nearly doubled its share.” It’s a small survey, but “The steepest proportional decline is in Software & Data Science, the most traditional ‘learn to code’ pathway, which lost 44% of its 2025 share. AI saw the largest absolute drop of any single subject in the survey, down 6.2 points.

“The category did not decline uniformly. Students moved away fastest from the pathway most associated with entry-level software work, while the more applied and human-facing subfields held their ground better.”

Slashdot reader BrianFagioli writes:
Nova Learning says the share of surveyed middle and high school students naming Computer Science and AI as their primary academic interest fell from 42.3 percent in 2025 to 27.9 percent in 2026, while Engineering rose from 11.9 percent to 23 percent. The biggest gains came from Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering…

[B]roader enrollment data points in the same direction. The National Student Clearinghouse Research Center reported declines in Computer and Information Science enrollment at four year institutions, even as Engineering grew. AI coding tools are not proven to be the cause, but as software development changes and AI handles more coding tasks, students may be starting to rethink what a future in technology should look like. [Undergraduate enrollment in CS programs at four-year institutions fell 8.1%, to approximately 606,000 students.]

Re: Good riddance

By gweihir • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Yes. That Agile approach has really never worked. Competent people usually hate it and incompetent ones just produce trash a bit faster, which is not a win.

The fact of the matter is that when you produce stuff more complex than simple web interfaces or business logic, you cannot accommodate changing specifications during the project. It will mess up everything. And, funny thing, that has been known for a long, long time. It is just that we have far too many incompetents in the industry.

Re:They’re not losing interest.

By gweihir • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Outsourcing is actually an excellent comparison. Having had the misfortune of reviewing code from supposedly “quality” outsourcing several times about 15 years back, I now recognize this as an early form of “slop”. Code produced with no insight, exactly matching the spec and the spec not being very good (which is normal).

The legal angle for LLM “code” is going to be even funnier. First, it does not have your copyright, as LLMs results do not qualify for copyright. But second, it may have somebody else’s copyright, if the LLM produced training data too directly! One of the reasons the GCC project has prohibited LLM code completely and the Linux Kernel requires it to be clearly labelled (so they can rip it out later if needed).

Re:And this too shall pass

By gweihir • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I do not think so, at least not with LLMs. The problem is that an LLM does not even begin to reach the level of reliability of a typical compiler. LLMs hallucinate, create bloated code, leave out functionality that was requested, have no clearly specified functionality, cannot deal with subtleties, etc. Hence LLM-generated code needs to be reviewed carefully and that is probably in the end more expensive than having somebody competent write the code from scratch. There are also indications that reviewing LLM code is mind-numbingly boring and people will burn out doing it, while even now there are not enough people that can do it in the first place.

Also note that the attempts of replacing programmers are _very_ old. When I studied CS almost 40 years ago, the 5GL project had just resoundingly failed. Its idea was to have program specifications in constraint logic and then have the machine create code for that. The problem was not that this did not work. The problem was that creating a specification on the level required was much harder and more time-consuming that writing the code directly with a typical informal or semi-formal specification. And, quite frankly, I see the same problem with LLMs as translation engine, as soon as you need actual production quality code. For producing low-quality slop, LLMs are fine. But that slop will not survive in the real world, especially as the one form of code LLMs are really good at creating is attack code, which does not need to be reliable, secure or maintainable. Hence low-skill hackers got a major upgrade here, while LLM use makes the defenders even weaker.

Re: Good riddance

By serviscope_minor • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Yes. That Agile approach has really never worked.

Kind of depends if you mean Agile(tm) or agile-small-a.

This isn’t really the generic defense of “if your scrum isn’t working, you’re doing it wrong/it’s not scrum or a true scotsman”. After all, scrum is a bunch of large sweaty men (or women) all pushing against each other scrabbling after a moving target and then often just collapses in a mess. Kind of like Agile-scrum so maybe it’s well named…

But really agile is an attempt to capture how small teams work on smaller projects with good people on large projects with mediocre people. Naturally it never works because (a) the teams are big and (b) the people are mediocre. It’s meant to also offset some of the worst excesses of insane project management by doing things differently but unfortunately if you have an insane project manager who ran things in a crazy and unproductive way they are not going to become not crazy with a new framework of rules.

So in conclusion: agile is great if you can do it, but you can’t do it for exactly the reasons why you need it in the first place. It is I believe therefore doomed by its very definition.

Re: Good riddance

By pla • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Not trying to be snarky here, but that’s always been the simplest answer to successful collaboration on a coding project.

And even on solo projects it doesn’t hurt. Sure, I can keep track of a few thousand lines of code (and to be clear I’m not paid by the line) in my head on a solo project. Above that - or throw one junior engineer in the mix as a “helper” - and all bets are off. Document, document, document, and then stick to the plan.

‘Coyote vs. Acme’ Outgrosses All But 3 WB Movies This Year, Heads To Profit

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
The movie Coyote vs. Acme earned more than Warner Bros.’ $30 million tax write-off in just two weeks. And last week the movie officially earned more than its production budget of $70 million. But today the movie passed the $100 million mark. “You asked for it, we delivered, and you showed up!” distributor Ketchup Entertainment posted on social media (adding “Thank you to the fans for making this a massive hit!”)

With a break-even number of $120 million, the movie “will probably make up any theatrical deficit (should there be any) with its impending releases on video on demand and streaming,” writes ScreenRant. Almost three years after the completed film was initially shelved for a $30 million write-off, its cumulative domestic box office has apparently even beat Warner Bros. dinosaur movie The End of Oak Street:
In addition to officially joining the chart of the Top 30 movies of the year so far at the domestic box office, by surpassing The End of Oak Street, Coyote vs. Acme has outgrossed five of the eight movies that Warner Bros. has put out in domestic theaters this year.... [It’s just $17.6 million behind Supergirl, and within $30 million of Mortal Kombat II and Wuthering Heights.] Their anticipated sci-fi sequel Dune: Part Three also seems guaranteed to land higher than 2026’s Coyote vs. Acme on the chart (2021’s Dune earned $108.9 million in domestic theaters, while Dune: Part Two earned $282.1 million).
With its a small marketing budget of just $10 million, the movie seems to be relying on oddball marketing stunts like their AMA on Reddit’s r/movies. And commemorating the spirit of the movie, Crayon-maker Crayola even released a special "Coyote Secret Plan” web page for children to print and color — and partnered with the film’s stars for a video on the importance of creativity:

Lana Condor: Crayola is all about encouraging kids and grown-ups to turn imagination into action.

Will Forte: Which is exactly what Coyote does in Coyote versus Acme. He sees a problem and thinks, “Could this be solved with a rocket, a catapult, or a suspiciously affordable mail order anvil?”

Lana Condor: Usually no.

Will Forte: Usually very no.

Well then let me be the firs one to…

By nospam007 • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Meep, meep!

Re:Ketchup Entertainment

By omnichad • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Pretty sure WB gets nothing. Except for the fact that they can create new merchandise for their characters. They sold worldwide distribution rights in total with no revenue sharing as far as I can tell.

Re:Performance or nostalgia?

By larryjoe • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Just because the film attracts a big audience doesn’t mean it’s any good. If anything, it’s either viewers’ nostalgia and big hopes or the success of the marketing department.

What I’d like to know is how many people though it was good after the screening. There should be a mandatory exit survey after every film you watch, or those yay/neutral/nay buttons you find in toilets asking you to rate your service today.

To me, from the trailer alone, it looks like they turned an epic cartoon into a boring legal case with lots of PC and guilt-trippiny Coyote, sprinkled with the most prominent lines served at random.

Rotten Tomatoes has it at 96% reviews and 95% audience, which are really high scores. Is it Oscar material? Obviously not. It is nostalgic? Absolutely. But we shouldn’t discount nostalgia. For food, nostalgia is often most of the enjoyment for “authentic” or “comfort” food and far exceeds any technical merits of the food. Enjoyment from nostalgia has a far stronger effect than technical merits. Same thing for movies.

Re: “Eat the rich!”

By drinkypoo • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Flat taxes are regressive because the poor spend more of their money on necessities, unless you then issue corrections in which case there’s no benefit to doing a flat tax because it doesn’t save you any effort.

If you actually wanted to fix this problem you’d eliminate loopholes and the alternate rate of capital gains tax

Re:Hollywood Accounting needs to be banned,prosecu

By omnichad • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Once they sell the movie rights, they lose the tax write-off and owe taxes on it once again (but on the $50 million sale price, not the $30 million write-off amount).

$50 + $10 million is what Ketchup put in (they spent the marketing, not WB). They are getting roughly half of ticket proceeds (WB gets nothing). So to make back $60 million, they need $120 million in total sales.

Pentagon Investigators Say Overreliance on Palantir AI Contributed to US Strike That Killed 123 Iranian Children

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Two U.S. missiles hit an elementary school in Iran, killing over 150 people including 123 children on the first day of the Iran War. But Gizmodo notes that a new Bloomberg investigation cites U.S. officials involved in an unreleased internal Pentagon review who blame “a cascade of preventable failures that included an overreliance on an AI tool built by Palantir.”
According to the officials who spoke to Bloomberg, some personnel inside U.S. Central Command leaned too hard on the AI inside the Maven Smart System, an AI-powered data integration and targeting platform developed by Palantir to accelerate intelligence analysis and decision-making. The Defense Department has reportedly made the software tool a cornerstone of military operations over the past year… Officials said some users expected Maven to flag stale records or contradictions in the intelligence assembled for potential targets, though it is not clear why they thought the system would do that. The Minab [elementary school] site, which was cataloged as an Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps facility due to outdated data, was fed into Maven with other candidates and came out as a recommended day-one target. Target-list work that once took hours was condensed into minutes.

A Palantir spokesperson told Bloomberg the company “is not responsible for the underlying data nor identifying intelligence deficiencies” and that there is no evidence its software was at fault. Two people familiar with Palantir’s Pentagon contracts said the government keeps primary responsibility for the quality of the information that’s fed into Maven. After the strike, Palantir added features that “re-review underlying intelligence to identify factors that would disqualify a target and flag inconsistencies and inaccuracies that human review may have missed,” a person familiar with the work said. That new functionality is said to have already caught some anomalies…

More than 1,000 Iranian targets were hit in the first 24 hours, and according to Bloomberg’s sources, that pace compressed the time available for additional confirmations. Staffing on civilian harm mitigation teams across the U.S. Department of Defense had also fallen by roughly 90% over recent years, shrinking to fewer than 20 people overall. The U.S. Central Command’s group shrank from 10 people to one. No member of those teams reviewed the Minab site before the missiles were up in the air.

A separate inquiry by the United Nations’ Independent International Fact-Finding Mission on Iran this week reached the conclusion that there were reasonable grounds to believe the United States committed the war crime of launching an indiscriminate attack.

So that’s still incompetence

By rsilvergun • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Because it didn’t achieve any of their goals.

I believe that the actual fundamental goal of the attacks on Iran was to trigger a second to 9/11 that Trump could ride into midterm election wins and maybe even a third term. Trump saw what a terrorist attack on us soil did for Bush Junior’s numbers and I’m sure he wants that.

The problem is I ran has pretty good control over their non-state actors so they didn’t take the bait. So we are basically stuck in a war that’s causing hyperinflation.

This is also why Trump is suddenly so pro AI it’s the only thing holding up the stock market around all the stupid shit Trump keeps doing. He desperately needs the stock market to stay high because the baby boomers and older Gen x that put him in the White House really only give a shit about the stock market because that’s where all their savings are because that’s how they stay ahead of inflation. As long as the Dow keeps going up those voters will keep backing Trump because their money stays ahead of inflation no matter how much Trump fucks up everything..

This is kind of the problem we have now. There are tens of millions of older voters who are completely disconnected from the broader economy because they are retired and they have a bunch of savings. Eventually the stock market will come crashing down and they are investments won’t keep Pace with inflation anymore and they’re going to be good and proper fucked but the goal of the American right wing is to shut down elections through voter suppression by then so it won’t matter what they think anymore.

Again all of this is incompetence. None of these people are achieving their goals the way a psychopath like Dick Cheney did or somebody like Karl Rove. They are killing a lot of innocent people, Elon Musk is the greatest mass murderer of the 21st century for example having killed 8 million children and he’s on track to knock out another 9 million at least. But again that’s incompetence.

Re:So we all know they are lying

By ceoyoyo • Score: 5, Informative Thread

basic incompetence and a complete disregard for human life.

The first bit of this sentence is absolutely wrong.

I don’t know, that sentence seems to describe Hegseth pretty well, along with the people who put him in his current job. Unless you’re arguing that his incompetence is more advanced than “basic.”

Re: If only

By drinkypoo • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Kind of makes you wonder if he lied about it for a reason

It’s getting tiring hearing you call everyone a liar

Feel free to foe me and score my comments down if your feefees are hurt.

instead of reflecting on the fact that a significant portion of people are just idiots

If they’re speaking as if they knew facts when they don’t, then they’re lying about their level of information.

Re:AI never lies, it just has bad human data?

By spitzak • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

In 2001 supposedly it really was “human error”. Some humans told Hal 9000 to lie to the astronauts and not reveal that an alien artifact had been found on the moon. And that was a mistake as they probably either knew or could test what would happen to Hal.

This is remarkably similar to things going wrong with AI now, actually.

Re:So we all know they are lying

By larryjoe • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

We know it was just basic incompetence and a complete disregard for human life.

The first bit of this sentence is absolutely wrong. [Lots of interesting stuff.]

Basically all the interesting stuff that you wrote supports that idea that Hegseth was incompetent and had a complete disregard for human life.

Google Opens Preorders for Its $899 Gemini-Enhanced ‘Googlebook’ Laptops

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Monday Google opened preorders for its “Googlebook” laptops, pricing them at $899. A Google’s blog post added that “At launch, you can choose between Intel Core Ultra Series 3 and Snapdragon X Elite processors” (paired with NPUs to power AI features).

“Devices will hit shelves on October 4 in the U.S. and on October 5 in Canada, the U.K., Ireland, France, Germany, and Australia,” TechCrunch points out. But “the real pull for the new devices is that they’ll prominently feature Gemini’s latest capabilities in a new format: the laptop.”
Google is trying to offer a laptop with unique features like an AI-powered cursor, vibe-coded widgets, and support for AI-enhanced dictation. The latter is a feature called Rambler, which cleans up messy, rambling brain dumps into readable text. The move is a bet that AI, specifically Google’s Gemini, could be enough of a draw to get people to buy a new laptop that bakes in AI instead of running them via desktop apps you install or access through the browser… On the Googlebook, Google is trying to reinvent the “point-and-click” experience of desktop computing to now include an AI element: The cursor serves as a conduit to Gemini. The company suggests various ways this could be used, like highlighting content on a web page for Gemini to work with, asking Gemini to see if an email you’ve hovered your cursor over is suspicious, or selecting images and then asking Gemini to visualize them together…

What’s more interesting about the Googlebook is how it’s seemingly part of Google’s longer-term plan to capture a large part of the K-12 market that currently relies on Chromebooks and push them toward the company’s Gemini AI. There are somewhere around 50 million Chromebooks in schools, used by students and educators, Google has said. In May, the company told TechCrunch that its current Chromebooks would continue to be supported, though many would become eligible to transition to the new Googlebook experience in the future…

Flagship devices in the new range are being built by Acer, ASUS, Dell, HP, and Lenovo, with materials like aluminum, magnesium alloy, and carbon fiber… Google says the device will offer up to 14 hours of battery life.
Googlebooks will be decorated with an exterior Glowbar “which dances when you boot up, sweeps to show battery level, and supports other playful patterns,” according to Google’s blog post. “We’re also opening Glowbar access to developers to build custom, interactive animations.”

After testing actual Googlebooks, The Verge’s reviewer first acknowledges that “it might be just another Trojan horse for Gemini.” Still, “The hardware is polished (since it’s based on current laptops). The OS is familiar (if you’ve ever used a Chromebook). But most impressive, it integrates your Android phone with your PC so they feel more like one device. It’s the culmination of a series of new ideas that blur the two devices together.

“After my first look, I went from doubtful to excited by the prospect of Google pulling it all off…”
The Asus was incredibly lightweight; the Lenovo has plenty of ports and an optional mouse with a matching Glowbar light; the Acer’s convertible form factor allows some tablet-like use (and it’s pretty affordable for a Panther Lake laptop). The HP had a great-looking screen and a latticeless keyboard I surprisingly didn’t hate, and the Dell is basically a gold XPS 13 (which is excellent) but with a different chip…

But everything really special about Googlebooks comes down to software… You can cast apps from an Android phone directly to a Googlebook, even without touching your phone. Googlebooks essentially have two app drawers: a G-logo start menu for installed Googlebook apps and a second one beside it that pulls up mobile apps from your phone. Click a phone app and you can fully use that app with the mouse and keyboard or the Googlebook’s touchscreen. It’s a bit like iPhone Mirroring on macOS, but the apps are individually extracted to the desktop OS instead of showing your whole phone interface.

Googlebooks also have a nifty feature called Continue On where the icons of apps you’re currently using on your phone appear in the bottom bar — allowing you to click it on the laptop and hand it off to the Googlebook. These app handoffs can transition to a native app or a web app, depending on how developers have programmed it… The other big way Googlebooks interact with an Android phone is Quick Access, allowing you to see and access all the files stored on your phone right in the desktop Files app… If you have an iPhone then you’re limited to a Link to iOS app that just does some message syncing and replying… [W]hen it comes to mainline gaming, Nvidia’s GeForce Now service is also coming to Googlebooks, and the first year is free with one of Google’s new laptops.
“It’s not every day we get a new player in the desktop operating system and laptop spaces,” the reviewer points out. “There seems to be a higher ceiling of potential with Googlebooks than there was with Chromebooks, along with some cool features, but Google has a lot to prove at higher prices than people are used to paying for its laptops.”

AI cursor? Wasn’t Clippy bad enough?

By AntisocialNetworker • Score: 5, Funny Thread

You seem to be hovering over someone’s crotch. Would you like to see porn?

Collecting AI training data from students

By butt0nm4n • Score: 3 Thread

Down to how they move their mouse. Orwellian dystopia again, it would be boring and predictable, if it wasn’t so creepy … for kids, really?

Does the AI work without an Internet connection?

Re:Pixelbook Go

By YuppieScum • Score: 5, Informative Thread

None of these companies, including Google, are “making” the hardware.

They’re taking a reference design from Google, tweaking it a bit for marketing and BoM purposes, and having it built by one of the big ODMs such as FoxConn, Quanta or Compal.

Huge Advertisement

By 0xG • Score: 3 Thread

This breathless gushing over a piece of hardware from the likes of Google is just over-the-top advertising.
And it’s taking as much space as 3-4 regular stories? Shame on the editors!

You will own nothing and be happy

By OrangeTide • Score: 3 Thread

After 12 months the subscription to AI Pro is $26.99/mo.

You can cancel the subscription and still use the laptop, but some features that were built into it go away without AI Pro. Such as autonomous agent support, and of course you look 5 TB of cloud storage when you drop Pro.

Meta’s New ‘Personal AI Agent’ Muse Beats ChatGPT in Downloads - and Get Blocked by Amazon

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Meta’s AI “personal agent” Muse overtook ChatGPT as the #1 iOS free app in the U.S. on Friday, reports CNBC — and it’s still showing more downloads as of Monday night.

Muse now has over 2.5 million downloads since its debut less than two weeks ago, according to analytics firm Sensor Tower…
[Muse] is currently ahead of popular services like OpenAI’s ChatGPT, Polymarket and Kashi… It’s also ahead of rival AI apps like Anthropic’s Claude and SpaceXAI’s Grok AI, in addition to the Facebook-parent’s own Meta AI app… Meta pitched the app as a way for consumers to manage and direct supercharged digital assistants that can perform a number of tasks across the web, like filling out electronic forms and organizing email inboxes… “I think up to this point most of the agentic use cases have not really been for normal people,” Bernstein analyst Stacy Rasgon told CNBC in a “Squawk on the Street” interview on Monday. “Now you’ve got Meta’s Muse and other agents out there that are starting to maybe get more potential for more broad-based adoption.” The buzz around Meta was also reflected in the stock, which surged more than 11% on Monday.
Amazon is already blocking Muse, reports GeekWire. Amazon first tried to get Meta to voluntarily exclude Amazon, but they were unsuccessful:
The problem, Amazon says, is that it never agreed to any of it. Meta didn’t tell Amazon that Muse would access its store, the agent doesn’t identify itself when it browses, and it appears to capture and store customer credentials, which the company says could create privacy and security risks. As of Sunday night, people trying to use Muse to shop on Amazon were seeing the popup, “Continued access by an unauthorized AI agent violates Amazon’s Conditions of Use, to which our customers have agreed…”

Amazon has spent the past year trying to keep outside agents off its site, suing Perplexity over its Comet browser and moving to block shopping agents from Google and OpenAI. [Amazon won a preliminary injunction against Perplexity in March, the article poitns out, “then lost it on Aug. 4, when the Ninth Circuit ruled that the user — not the AI company — was the one accessing Amazon’s computers under federal anti-hacking law. The court denied Amazon’s petition for rehearing on Sept. 10.”]

On Sunday night, Amazon said it is in direct conversation with Meta about the issue. Asked whether it would consider taking legal action, the company declined to comment. The business stakes are high for Amazon. In addition to operating its flagship e-commerce site, Amazon generated more than $68 billion in ad revenue last year — a business that depends on people browsing its pages and seeing sponsored products.
Muse also appears to scrape account data, reports CNBC. But Shopify, however, “is working with Meta on Muse access. Shopify CEO Tobias Lütke announced Monday that the e-commerce site was partnering with Muse to allow agentic checkout in its online stores.”

Ironic

By data_dreamer • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

how now its Amazon putting up a fuss about external apps hammering it. When I was back in the trenches, running a site on a dedicated server was a nonstop battle against constant bots originating from AWS.

How to monetize AI

By commodore73 • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Since people in general will not pay for AI, and its use doesn’t seem to financially benefit most organizations (at least at current prices and capabilities), the monetization options so far appear to be coding/hacking, ads, user data collection, and tracking? Likely selling collected data to governments, marketing, and other leaches? Will that be enough to recover the data center investments?

Purchase complete!

By hadleyburg • Score: 5, Funny Thread

So unlike ChatGPT, Muse, being an “agent”, can be given access to your bank account (for viewing?), and can apparently do shopping for you. It seems that it can be given use of your credit card.

User: I’m thinking of getting a new car.
Muse: Ok… I have sold your current car and have purchased a new one. I have also resigned from your job and applied for a new one with a better salary so that you can afford the repayments on the new car. I have also taken the liberty of sending flowers to the woman you talked to yesterday at the supermarket. She is quite wealthy. I calculate that if you can marry her within the year your financial problems will be further eased. She is already married, but I have sent suspicious letters to their address to prompt a divorce… Is there anything else you would like me to do?

Re:How to monetize AI

By Rei • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Coding, primarily. That’s the majority of the text-generation token burn, and strong majority of paying users. Free users asking questions about their daily lives make up a lot of people but only quite small amounts of tokens per user per day, and generally on tiny models. Some users like mathematicians may burn through a lot of tokens on their work, but there’s just not enough of them to matter in the overall picture.

Margins at Anthropic and OpenAI are an impressive 40% (and also sustainable at the open model providers), so this isn’t just going away. Most of the costs are on scaleup and the infinite race to develop the latest, greatest frontier models.

Re:Ironic

By pla • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
I’m not saying this as anti-Amazon or pro-AI (and certainly not pro-Meta!), but the key difference here is people are choosing to send proxy shoppers because they can’t stand how crappy the store itself is. The closest analogous physical situation would be Walmart refusing to let your aunt pick up some half&half for you.

That said, I’m not really sure why Amazon wants to die on this hill considering it’s already been decided by the 9th circuit in Amazon v. Perplexity 2026. An agent acting on behalf of its user cannot be considered “unauthorized” access under CFAA or CDAFA as long as the user themself had a right to the same content accessed.

Amazon might be able to spin this into a TOS issue, but that has its own risks - Anyone TOSsed from a platform clearly won’t be buying anything from it, “sponsored” or otherwise. And dissecting that a bit further, the entire question only exists today because we’re currently in a grey area between viewing agents as an external resource vs just another tool built into the browser (the latter was the heart of the Perplexity case). Assuming people eventually come to love the bomb, telling our browser to go buy something on Amazon will become technologically indistinguishable from doing it ourselves.

Paramount Skydance ‘Emerges Victorious’, Finally Wins Settlement for Warner Bros Takeover

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Paramount Skydance just “emerged victorious” reports Reuters, “from a legal battle over its $110 billion acquisition of Warner Bros Discovery” that will “dramatically concentrate power across Hollywood’s film, TV, streaming and news businesses.”

The victory comes “after settling with a California-led group of US states and a Hollywood writers union, paving the way for one of the largest media mergers in history.”
Paramount agreed to abide by temporary film quotas and a news oversight committee, avoiding a forced sale of cable assets such as CNN or any of its lucrative film franchises… The Writers Guild of America settled its parallel case against Paramount, while saying it still believes the deal will damage the industry. The states’ settlement forced the union to “contend with the reality of forging ahead alone, with no backing from government enforcers” in a complex case that would have cost millions of dollars…

Paramount promised in the state settlement to bring more film production to the US — spending at least $300 million more each year in domestic production — and adhere to US theatrical release quotas for five years. The company will produce 30 movies in each of the first two years of the deal, and 32 movies in each of the following three years, Bonta said. Each year, at least four of those films must be independent films and at least 20% must be blockbusters. If it falls below that threshold, it will pay $30 million per film, most of it into funds to support workers. Paramount also promised not to raise rates on theater operators for three years.
The article notes that California attorney general Rob Bonta still said “I don’t think these two companies should merge” at a press conference announcing the settlement, “but that’s not something that we are focused on with our resolution here.” He call their agreement “a strong antitrust outcome.”

And Politico notes that Bonta acknowledged at the press conference that “Some of you who may be watching this may have wanted a different outcome. I understand that.”
But he argued he’d reached a settlement capable of “providing more film production that protects Hollywood workers and their livelihoods, that places guardrails allowing for robust cable negotiations, that protects competition and creates more choice for consumers about what this merger could mean for the industry.” It “resolves the antitrust concerns at the heart of our lawsuit against the company and Warner Brothers,” he said…

The agreement came as a disappointment to opponents of the transaction, including the Block the Merger Coalition, which cast the settlement as a sweetheart deal for Paramount Chief Executive David Ellison and his father, Oracle Co-Founder Larry Ellison, who is financially backstopping the acquisition. “This is a bad deal for the future of film, entertainment, independent journalism, and a strong democracy in this country,” the coalition said in a statement. “We are disappointed and angry that the interests of average Americans have been trampled to benefit oligarch billionaires.....”

The $111 billion deal allows Paramount to combine its namesake streaming service with HBO Max, creating a new offering with about 200 million subscribers. That would help Paramount compete against companies such as Netflix, which boasts more than 325 million subscribers worldwide.

At least 20% must be blockbusters

By zamboni1138 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I understand that on the production side a blockbuster movie is a large-budget feature film for mass markets. But how do you guarantee massive popularity and huge financial success?

Re:NO one thinks this merger is a good idea....

By rsilvergun • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
They can’t move to Nashville because the actors won’t move with them. They can incorporate in Nashville but who the fuck cares anymore? If you’re not going to pay taxes in my state why would I care whether you incorporate in my state?

Every single time we suggest that companies stop screwing us over we inevitably get told that they will just take all the money and leave. Then they don’t do that because the only reason they’re here in the first place is some other thing like well, California is a nice place to live and the people who they need to work for them want to live in california, and then they don’t leave even though they threatened to.

If there is a cheaper place with less regulation that a company can move to and still have the same resources available they’re always going to do that immediately and no amount of appeasement is going to keep them around. More importantly if they’re not contributing anything to your community and they are just taking let them leave.

There is plenty of other things people can do in California that are productive besides make movies. But again that’s all a moot point because they’re not going anywhere no matter how many threats they make.

I mean not physically. Like I said they might try to incorporate in another state in order to do bad things to people but who cares again because they are still going to have to hire Californians because the people they want to do the work want to live in California.

Re:Doubt you really give a shit.

By ArchieBunker • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

You and your pals are busy calling them Trumpers and trying to take their rights, increase their fuel costs,

Dear sir, have you checked diesel prices and who the current president is lately?

Re:NO one thinks this merger is a good idea....

By silentbozo • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

“They can’t move to Nashville because the actors won’t move with them. They can incorporate in Nashville but who the fuck cares anymore? If you’re not going to pay taxes in my state why would I care whether you incorporate in my state? "

There’s so much wrong with that sentence, and yet it pretty much sums up why California lost hundreds of millions of dollars of production to other states (and countries), because the politicians in California believed the same thing until it was too late. It’s the myth of American exceptionalism but applied specifically to California.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…

“By 2025, the cost of filming in California was so high relative to other jurisdictions that it was cheaper to fly Rob Lowe all the way to Dublin, Ireland and back to host the game show The Floor, along with 100 American contestants, than to simply film the show in California.[19] About that, Lowe said: “It’s criminal what California and L.A. have let happen â" it’s criminal. Everybody should be fired.’"[19]

A side effect of outsourcing film and television work is that fewer apprenticeships are available to the next generation of California filmmakers. This is slowly eroding the concentration of experience and know-how which had made Hollywood unique.[8] As show business jobs continued to evaporate steadily during the 2020s, Los Angeles was widely seen at risk of becoming the next Detroit.[19] The January 2025 wildfires pushed many filmmaking professionals to their breaking point.[19] Financially, it made more sense for many of them to move to the places where their jobs had gone, than to try to stay and rebuild.[19]"

To give a specific example of another city in the US that has become a major film power house - Atlanta:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…

“Trilith Studios is an American film and television production studio located south of Atlanta in Fayette County, Georgia. Originally known as Pinewood Atlanta Studios, the studio has been used to produce many films and television programs, particularly those produced by Marvel Studios. Trilith Studios encompasses a 700-acre site, with a 400-acre backlot and 32 soundstages.[1] A virtual production volume, Prysm Stage, opened in early 2022. As of 2024, Trilith Studios is the largest production facility in the state of Georgia and the largest outside of Hollywood.”

Atlanta is only a day’s away by plane from Los Angeles. Same thing with New York. I know people in the film industry who commute outside of LA to work for months at a time (because even though they’d rather work close to home… there’s no work here.) It’s not like this is a new thing - think about it - how else do you shoot on location?

But even Atlanta is feeling the pinch as production moves overseas these days.

“The first production to film at the studio was Marvel Studios’ film Ant-Man (2015), which began in September 2014.[5][6] Marvel primarily shot their films at the facility for nearly a decade until 2025, where they changed their primary filming location to London.”

https://cinedrones.com/updates…

“On July 2, 2025, Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a bill increasing California’s Film and Television Tax Credit Program from $330 million to $750 million annually, a significant step aimed at luring productions back to the Golden State. The legislation, hailed as a lifeline for an industry battered by a âoequadruple-whammyâ of the COVID-19 pandemic, 2023 writers’ and actors’ strikes, Southern California wildfires and fierce competition from other regions, is projected to generate thousands of jobs and billions in economic activity. Yet, industry insiders and data suggest this boost may be too little, too late, as Los Angeles continues to lose its grip on film and TV production.

According to FilmLA, the film office for Los Angeles, shoot days in the region plummeted to 5,048 in the third quarter of 2024, marking the weakest quarter of the year and a 22.4% drop from the same period in 2023. Overall, 2024 saw just 23,480 shoot days, the second-lowest figure recorded outside the pandemic-stricken 2020. Since 2022, California has lost an estimated 17,000 entertainment jobs, with the state’s share of national film and TV employment dropping from 35% to 27%. These numbers paint a stark picture: Hollywood is bleeding, and the new tax credits may not be enough to stop the exodus.”

You’re clearly not in tune with the local news here. Film production is way down. Studios are essentially banks, and have been for decades - they package deals and get financing. The days of the studio system ended half a century ago. There are equally nice places outside of California (Vancouver, B.C. being one of them) that have successfully doubled for shooting locations in the US, and yes, they have union crews there.

Finally, you make it sound like studios don’t pay taxes. Regardless of the financial accounting tricks they play (like killing already completed movies), I’ll tell you the guaranteed taxes they do pay: payroll taxes for all the hourly and salaried employees that are working in the state, which covers medicare, social security, and state unemployment insurance.

Re:Yes

By AmiMoJo • Score: 5, Informative Thread

California has been on the verge of a mass exodus of businesses for decades. Occasionally one is daft enough to try it, and realizes that the grass isn’t really greener. Musk is one of the most recent, having incorporated some business and moved some management stuff out of California, just enough to claim he did it without actually doing it. Meanwhile California continues to be the richest state by a mile.

As KDE Turns 30, Contributors and Commits are Going Strong

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“In a few weeks, KDE will turn 30 years old,” writes core contributor Kevin Ottens, celebrating with some special KDE community data analytics (including a 30-year graph of the number of contributors):
It peaks around 180 on average (and sometimes reaches towards around 200 people) then shrinks again hitting bottom around 110 persons on average in 2017… Since then, we had two major events happening. First, 2018 is the year where we had the first set of KDE Goals being picked by the community, one being “Streamlined onboarding of new contributors”. Second, we had the transition to GitLab which was fully delivered early in the second quarter of 2020…

Now it seems like the team size is around 140 people on average, so closer to the all time high of 2010 but we didn’t fully close the gap yet. Interestingly though, the commit count is much closer to the one we had in 2010, with a bit less people. We even had an all time high commit count in 2023 which surpassed any other week since the creation of the project. And to make things even brighter, the trends at the end of the plot point upwards. Looks like 2026 will be a very good year. Hopefully the growth will stay stable this time and then the community will be the biggest it’s ever been…

[For the KDE Plasma desktop] We find the 2010 dip but it’s much less dramatic than in all the other plots. It stabilized much quicker and managed to stay with an almost identical team size. We also find the increase leading up to 2020. And clearly it’s one of the projects which benefitted the most of the GitLab transition. It’s average team size almost doubled during the transition! Earlier I asked where the increase we could see on KDE as a whole but not on applications was coming from? Well, this is probably it. Like the rest of KDE, 2026 will be a very good year for Plasma as well. I wonder… will it double in size again next year compared to 2020?
“I’m rather happy that KDE as a whole seems very healthy…” the post concludes. “It looks like in almost 30 years KDE built a great community and many awesome products…”

“Kudos to all the people involved for the past 30 years! Even if you’re not involved any more you helped contribute something beautiful and precious to the world. We’re the living proof that large commons can be created and made sustainable thanks to passionate people.”

Re: Revisiting

By drinkypoo • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

GNOME 2 was definitely better than the KDE of its day.

GNOME 3 OTOH…

I’m happy for them!

By sarren1901 • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Good for KDE for turning 30! Makes me feel old. I started dabbling with Linux in 99 or 00’ and back then I liked KDE as it felt like a bridge of sorts from Windows. Slackware had packages for KDE so I tried that distro. Back then I had all the time in the world to dig through config files and what not. Slackware was great for this as pretty much everything was configured via one file or another. You really learn a lot about how the OS works, down to the kernel level, when you were install Slackware at that time.

Other distros such as Mandrake tried pushing everything through GUI tools and as often as not they wouldn’t work and you would be stuck going to config files. I found them harder to get things running smoothly versus Slackware where you were in the trenches but nothing was hidden or obfuscated. I don’t recall why I didn’t care for Debian back in the day. Probably the much slower release cycle and I was more interested in the latest and greatest.

Unreal Tournment 2004 running natively on Linux is part of what encouraged me to try something that wasn’t Microsoft. I also loved that Linux came with all the networking tools and server software that sure as heck didn’t come with Desktop Windows. Not that you would want to run ISS anyway. Shudders.

These days, I run XFCE and love the simplicity of it. I should probably migrate away from Xubuntu but as a desktop it seems to just work.

Ubuntu+KDE seems like a great setup for incoming Windows Users looking to escape Microsoft.

Never cared for gnome either. XFCE over all!

So is anything good?

By PCM2 • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Everybody seems to be complaining … although that’s nothing new. Some people hate Gnome, others hate KDE.

So I ask you (everybody): Is anything good? Cuz we ain’t gonna have the Year of the Linux Desktop without a UI. Do we all switch to Enlightenment?

Re: So is anything good?

By drinkypoo • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

KDE is pretty good. There’s nothing really worth complaining about in the design and most of the major long running bugs have been stomped. If I did have a design complaint it would be related to the settings app, but even it is pretty ok.

Re:So is anything good?

By Mspangler • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder for desktops, mice, keyboards, and displays.

Try them out is all I can say. I spent last winter trying out KDE, Cinnamon, MATE, Xfce, Zorin, LxQt, Gnome, and Elementary. There is a new Cosmic DE out that I have not tried.

KDE seems to need more GPU than I have on that machine (RX 560). It stuttered and shook and the widgets editor flashes once and vanishes before you can do anything. It was pretty though. LxQt was also pretty but didn’t seem very cooperative. Zorin looks like Windows 11 (which is the point but pouring bleach in my eyes is not my thing). Elementary is still a work in progress as far as an App Store equivalent, Gnome had me shrieking in rage after 15 minutes, It does not work the way I do.

Cinnamon and I get along fine on a Ryzen 4600G with only the integrated graphics. MATE seems a little friendlier for some reason I can’t explain and works on older hardware as in a 2009 Core 2 Duo and is quite spritely on a 2012 Mac Mini (HD 4000 graphics). Xfce works quite well but is pretty spartan. It can be dolled up, but MATE already is good enough.

Are Book Publishers Warming Up to the AI Industry?

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
There’s at least 15 author-driven lawsuits underway against AI companies, while publishers have filed roughly 10 more coordinated suits of their own, notes Publisher’s Weekly. Yet “While the lawsuits play out, some publishers are building bridges.”
Google recently announced a partnership with Bloomsbury, De Gruyter Brill, Johns Hopkins University Press, Macmillan, O’Reilly Media, and Penguin Random House to enhance e-books from its Google Play store with AI, allowing readers to interact with the text of the books directly, ask questions and get answers, and develop tools such as quizzes and slideshows… [The CEO of the Author’s Guild called the partnership “a positive step forward in the legitimized use of books in the AI ecosystem to the benefit of readers, publishers, and authors alike.”]

Of even more significance is the growing number of licensing deals publishers are striking with AI companies. In 2024, HarperCollins became the first of the Big Five to publicly reveal that it had signed a deal to license its content for AI training. The three-year agreement paid $5,000 per participating title, split equally between HarperCollins and the authors. Wiley announced its first AI licensing deal in 2024 and has since made several more. For fiscal year 2026, it reported earning $49 million in revenue from the deals. The company also has a number of strategic collaborations with companies including Amazon Web Services, Microsoft, Anthropic, Perplexity, IQVIA, OpenEvidence, and others.
And publishers are even building in-house AI tools for producing royalty statements, proofreading, and providing customer service:
In its 2025 Salary and Jobs Report, Publisher’s Weekly reported that 63% of industry professionals surveyed said their organizations were using AI… Keith Riegert, president of the Stable Book Group and CEO of Perfect Bound, has been a vocal advocate for the use of AI in publishing — despite calling himself a “hardcore techno-pessimist.” He tells PW, “I do this because you use AI or you die at this point....” Like many in the industry, he maintains any use of AI must “start with a human and end with a human,” and he draws a clear line, avoiding AI for core creative work, such as selecting titles, designing covers, or creating illustrations — reserving it for developmental editing, formatting, and admin instead… What is known is that each of the Big Five is developing proprietary AI systems for internal use, as proven by the numerous AI-related job openings the companies have posted… [And the parent company of Penguin Random House said in 2025 they used AI for marketing and to forecast demand.]
There’ve been a few high-profile controversies about prominent authors accused of using AI. But Princeton University Press CEO Christie Henry “is less concerned about authors secretly using AI to write than about the time spent policing the situation.”
“It pulls us away from having focused time to think,” she says. Princeton University Press is currently vetting companies that promise to be able to certify that a given book was written by a human, including Created by Humans, Human Authored, and Verify My Writing. Henry adds that the proliferation of plagiarized, copycat, and pirated books online, now supercharged by AI agents mass producing and reproducing content, is further draining resources, as it demands constant vigilance and takedown requests sent to Amazon, YouTube, and others.

This is a multi-layered fight

By postbigbang • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Publishers are looking for revenue. Distribution sources, electronic, print, and secondary markets look for their revenue.

Copyright holders, who may not be any of the above (See Author’s Guild for litigation models) are another source of “injured parties”.

There then becomes the motivation of content creators, authors, writers, researchers, and others who look at their work output becoming sucked in without compensation— and this might be the biggest part of the problem.

If creators and researchers/etc stop generating source material, the entire food chain stops, and the quality of output to the ultimate consumer, us, becomes mightily stanched, a foot on the garden hose of knowledge.

Re:Will there be books in the future?

By dskoll • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

That would be a disaster because then anything the AIs or the people controlling them want us to forget, would indeed be forgotten.

Re:why should I read it

By postbigbang • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

and probably copyrighted it. Composed it. Maybe edited it. Laid it out on page. Perhaps illustrated it. Did the work.

Needs to get paid.

It’s like Harlan Ellison said: https://www.youtube.com/watch?…

NOT sucked up into an engine.

NOT guided by an “editor” with dubious values.

NOT enhanced by some well-intentioned silicon spew.

Real people. Real work. Getting paid.

Read the license before calling it hypocrisy

By CustomBuild • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Suing over allegedly unauthorized copying while selling licenses is a coherent position. Permission has a scope. Buying an ebook, asking software questions about it, and using it to train a general-purpose model are different uses. Lumping them together as “embracing AI” obscures most of the interesting questions.

The money figures check out. The Authors Guild confirms HarperCollins’ $5,000-per-title arrangement, split equally with participating authors. Crucially, it was opt-in, and the author’s payment did not count against their advance. The Guild also criticized the publisher’s 50% share. Wiley confirms $49 million in fiscal 2026 AI revenue. That establishes a market; whether authors are getting a good deal requires looking at the contracts.

Google’s announcement confirms the named publishers and more than 100,000 eligible books, with readers required to own the relevant title through Google Play Books. It describes interacting with books in Gemini Notebook. You cannot infer blanket permission for model training from that announcement.

A couple of numbers deserve their original qualifiers. PW reports approximately 15 other author-led lawsuits and roughly 10 publisher suits; those remain the publication’s estimates, rather than an independently reproduced case count. The 63% figure comes from survey respondents reporting their employers’ AI use. It does not measure how much publishing work AI performs.

The certification paragraph needs the most care. Human Authored explicitly uses identity verification and contractual self-certification. It does not scan a manuscript and prove that a human wrote it. Meanwhile, Created by Humans describes itself as an AI rights licensing platform. Listing these services together should not imply that reliable authorship detection is a solved problem.

I’m also unconvinced that developmental editing belongs in the same administrative bucket as formatting invoices. Decisions about structure, pacing, and character are creative decisions. And “start with a human and end with a human” needs an actual operating budget: give that human enough time and authority to reject the output. Otherwise, you’ve mainly ensured that somebody is available to take the blame.

Re:This is a multi-layered fight

By Looce • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The word “book” isn’t in there.

Australia Considers Smart Glasses Ban in Government Workplaces, While 70 People Sue Meta Over Unknowing Data Collection

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“Australia is considering barring the use of camera-equipped smart glasses in government workplaces…” reports Reuters, “in what it said could be the first ban of its kind.”

But meanwhile “more than 70 people who bought, used or were recorded with Meta’s smart glasses have sued the social media giant,” reports the Los Angeles Times, “claiming their intimate and sensitive images were exposed to workers abroad who are paid to review and label photos and videos.”
The contractors in Kenya work for companies that help train Meta’s artificial intelligence, according to a proposed class-action lawsuit amended in late August. The smart glasses users, some in California, allege the gadget captured footage of themselves and family members undressing, going to the bathroom, having sex and entering passwords. In some cases, the people said they weren’t aware the camera-equipped glasses were recording. One California user, referred to as PL18 in the lawsuit, alleges his glasses were unknowingly recording after he placed the smart glasses on the bathroom counter. “He noticed that at times photos of his family members using the bathroom and bathing began appearing in his gallery — footage no one in his household intended to take,” the lawsuit said....

The 230-page lawsuit, filed in a federal court in Northern California, accuses Meta of fraud and false advertising, along with violating other consumer protection laws in various states. Tina Wolfson, one of the lawyers representing the plaintiffs, said the case also centers on Meta’s surveillance of people’s lives without their consent and the exploitation of their image and likeness. “People who bought these glasses and thought that they were cool gadgets weren’t aware that every time they activated AI, video was sent to train Meta’s AI,” said Wolfson, a principal at law firm Ahdoot & Wolfson in Burbank. Meta disagrees with the allegations and intends to fight them.

“If you use Meta AI, we may review that data to help improve our products and people’s experiences — this works the same way as many other companies. We take steps to filter this data to help remove identifying information and to protect people’s privacy,” a Meta spokesperson said in a statement…

The lawsuit alleges people wearing the smart glasses were unwittingly transmitting data to Meta whenever they used Meta AI by saying “Hey Meta,” or sometimes accidentally when adjusting the glasses. “Every activation of the AI features, intentional or accidental, captures video and audio that is transmitted to Meta’s servers, routed overseas, and reviewed by low-paid human workers who watch, label, and embed these moments into Meta’s AI models,” the lawsuit said…

The lawsuit also seeks to block Meta from deploying biometric tools through its glasses. The company has been exploring a controversial feature called “NameTag” that would allow people to identify others… A separate lawsuit, filed in September in a federal court in Illinois, alleges Meta has been using images of people’s faces uploaded to their public Facebook and Instagram accounts to train AI that powers NameTag and other AI tools.

Why just there?

By Errol backfiring • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
I would love to R the FA, but it only tells me my ad blocker is working. This device should be banned everywhere, unless people consent to its use. You would not want to allow it in healthcare, conversations with lawyers or journalists, or, basically, anywhere in public.

Ban them everywhere

By Arrogant-Bastard • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
The perverts and thugs buying/using these aren’t using them for some benign reason; they’re using them to invade the privacy of anyone they can, any way they can. That statement shouldn’t surprise anyone: it’s why these were designed, built, and marketed. They’re explicitly intended to appeal to people just like Mark Zuckerberg: misogynists, psychopaths, sociopaths — in other words, he’s marketing to his peers. And predictably: it’s working.

What comes next? The nonconsensual AI-constructed nudes, the stalking, the harassment, the extortion, the exploitation, everything that inevitably follows when some of the very worst people in the world are handed a powerful tool that they can readily use for whatever purpose they wish. To Zuck, these outcomes aren’t problems to be solved; they’re valid use cases to be supported and encouraged. They’re the entire reason why he did this: he doesn’t have to go out and be the creep if he has a willing army of creeps ready to do it for him.

Re:Why just there?

By mccalli • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
“there is no right or expectation of privacy in public”

I agree (UK so different laws, but the principle is the same). However I increasingly feel this needs to be revised somehow. I’ll admit up front I don’t have all the answers here, but just intuitively it feels to me that this principle predates the era of cheap, automated mass surveillance whether government or private.

In the UK, privacy is protected via the Human Rights Act and UK GDPR. It provides for some level of protection, but it really seems to me that specific rules to address this kind of blanket recording need to start coming in. The definition of ‘commercial’, for instance. Is it commercial use if I record you on my glasses and then post it to Youtube? Arguably yes, since YouTube is a company and derives revenue from that. Same for Meta. But it’s very, very far from clear to me if that claim has enough weight to prevail. A specific set of rules to address what is essentially a new phenomenon needs to be brought in.

Recording is not new. Photographing is not new. But the ease and scale via which it can be achieved, manipulated, tracked…that is new.

Re:Why just there?

By Malc • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

As a Meta customer or user, the person with the glasses has had to agree to Meta’s terms and conditions, including their data processing. For me though, an innocent bystander in the street, I haven’t agreed to have information processed about me by Meta. Meta has a long suspected problem with shadow profiles, and I don’t want their massive processing capabilities to be able to reference me wherever I am, even if it’s in a public place. They have no system for me to make a GDPR request about the data they’re holding on me. Based on Meta’s behaviour over many years and statements from Zuck about privacy, they simply cannot be trusted with people’s personal data.

Re:Why just there?

By Malc • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Just to add: if the government, including the police, started mass video surveillance, there would be justified outrage. Meta has more data processing than at least the UK government and consequently should be given less leeway.

North Korean Hackers Posed as Recruiters. They Infected 30,000 Devices Worldwide

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot
“I would like to verify your technical abilities, so please download the specified file and complete the assigned task…”

Fake job listings aimed at software developers and IT professionals led to 30,000 infected devices in over 100 countries — and 7,000 compromised cryptocurrency wallets, leading to over $10 million (USD) transferred to North Korea. Inc. reports:
The hacks occurred from December 2025 through July 2026, according to a joint cybersecurity advisory issued Friday by Japanese, Australian, German, and U.S. authorities, including the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Defense Department’s Cyber Crime Center… The group reportedly has been active since 2023, carrying out both financially motivated attacks and cyberespionage…

The hackers lure job seekers through social media, online job platforms, gig-work sites and freelance marketplaces. WaterPlum asks responders to take part in virtual technical interviews or complete coding assignments. The attackers then instruct targets to download and run malicious files, sometimes under the guise of completing an assignment or troubleshooting a problem with videoconferencing software. Once the group gains access to a device or network, it uses malware to steal information, including browser passwords, screenshots, files, and cryptocurrency-wallet data. An infected computer can also provide an avenue into the network of the target’s employer, opening the door to intellectual-property theft and espionage, authorities said.

The operation overlaps with a separate scheme in which North Korean nationals conceal their identities and locations to obtain remote IT work with companies abroad, officials said.
The malicious files are “hosted on multiple online collaboration software developer platforms and code repositories,” the advisory points out, and includes malicious Node Package Manager (NPM) packages..”

Stolen ID images can also be used by North Korean IT workers to impersonate victims to obtain contracts and receive payment in foreign currency, but “The actors can also use stolen sensitive information for extortion.” In one case, a North Korean IT worker “extorted a company over payment and published its proprietary source code online. In another case, an IT Worker hired for website maintenance defaced the hiring company’s website and rendered the site inaccessible.”

The advisory provides clues for employers. It warns these malicious IT workers “tend to favor payment in cryptocurrency, and they may request that remuneration be sent to an account in another person’s name.” During interviews they’d sometimes used Al face-swapping software, then claimed network issues and disabled their video. And “On holidays celebrated in North Korea, the actors played games and watched soccer videos instead of conducting their usual malicious activities.”

Re:Smells like a scam

By geekmux • Score: 4, Funny Thread

If your first thought after "please download the specified file and complete the assigned task" isn’t “Hahahahaha - no,” then you’re either a fool..

Dare we test LinkedIn prevalence to see just how many foolish recruiters see how ‘funny’ that is? Seems this comes in the form of ‘homework’ assignments from recruiters/potential employers these days. Hackers saw a golden opportunity to exploit.

(LinkedIn Virgin) “The hell, is that stench..”

(Veteran with 866 application deaths) “Desperation. The onsite distillery turns it into a cologne we all wear now. Choice? Hahahahaha - no. We don’t.”

* submits application #867 *

Re:Smells like a scam

By Zarhan • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

They are a *bit* more sophisticated than that. Basically, they are saying “here’s a ZIP, it’s just a git repository” - essentially, they are saying that here’s a git bundle for you (instead of exposing that to Internet and asking you to do a git clone).

What happens then is that you unpack that repository, do your changes, and then do a git commit for the “assignment” they put up for posterity.

But then the pre-commit hook that they have configured fires and runs some binary blob that was included in the repository. This would of course not happen with a git clone, but when you just download an innocent-looking ZIP that has a src/ and .git/ subdirectories and git log shows “Version for applicant interviews”…you might be fooled.

So it’s not just “yeah download this .EXE and allow it to run as admin okthxbye”.

Never happened to me

By Quakeulf • Score: 4, Funny Thread

I’ve applied for over 1000 jobs the past two years and I only get automatically discarded upon clicking “Submit”. I wonder what it would take for me to get scammed like this. Please help, I want some excitement in my life.

Desperate people don’t think clearly

By rsilvergun • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
It doesn’t matter if it smells like a scam if you’ve been unemployed for 6 months and you’ve run out of things to sell.

We have 25% functional unemployment. That means a quarter of the population even if they have a job cannot support themselves. Some of them are living with relatives some of them have six or seven roommates and the rest are homeless living out of cars or under bridges. We have half a million homeless people working full-time. Probably more that’s an old statistic and the economy is in freefall.

You’re going to start seeing more and more breakdown in places. Eventually the combination of incompetent leadership from known child sex predators combined with a massive push for automation in a world where if you don’t work you don’t eat is going to start eroding the tax base and the consumer spending bases to the point where we will not be able to maintain an economy. At least not a consumer based economy like we have now. Change will be inevitable and we aren’t going to accept people sitting around eating bonbons and playing Xbox without working but we’re not going to have anything useful for them to do and we’re not going to let the government give them something useful to do.

When the tax base collapses police and fire will get shut down.

And remember no matter how good a shot you are you’re going to run out of ammo before the world runs out of desperate people with nothing to lose

Re:Smells like a scam

By cowwoc2001 • Score: 5, Informative Thread

It’s not so simple. They was actually “interviewed” by these guys last week.

The “recruiter” asks the candidate to clone a GitHub project and open it using Cursor. It doesn’t look like you’re running anything. You’re just opening a project file.

The Cursor installation is legit (downloaded from the official location) and the GitHub repository is 99% source-code so it doesn’t look harmful. The problem is that the repository contains a Cursor-specific configuration file that downloads and runs a binary when the project is opened.

These AI tools are not very smart, to say the least. In any case, luckily my antivirus blocked the operation; otherwise, I wouldn’t have noticed.