Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Privacy Backlash Explodes Against Meta’s Smart Glasses
  2. AI Reviews Bring ‘New Normal’ to Linux Release Candidates: Lots of Bug Fixes
  3. Flock Accused of Reactivating Its Cameras Without Notifying a Town
  4. California City Declares State of Emergency After Cyberattack
  5. AI-Powered Browser Just Generates Every Website From Scratch
  6. Ask Slashdot: What are the Costs of Switching Between Windows, MacOS, and Chrome?
  7. Slashdot Reader Builds ‘Spaced Linux’, a New Devuan-Based, User-Friendly Desktop Distro
  8. OpenAI Announces It’s Enhancing Security Controls, Pausing Some Work for New AI Model Astra
  9. Brain Activity Reveals the Melodies That People Imagine
  10. GNOME Receiving Additional Design Help From Germany’s Sovereign Tech Agency Fellowship
  11. Flock Camera Vandalism Continues Around America, While 100 Communities Reject ALPRs
  12. Quake Celebrates 30th Anniversary: New Official Episode With New Maps and Mechanics
  13. RAMageddon? 2027 Memory Capacity Reportedly Sold Out
  14. Google Should Still Be Forced To Shed Chrome, Advocacy Group Argues
  15. Slashdot Reader Builds a Photo-Verification App for iPhones

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Privacy Backlash Explodes Against Meta’s Smart Glasses

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
With nearly 70% of the market, “Meta wants its smart glasses to be a big hit,” writes the Los Angeles Times. But after some users found ways to disable the light that warns people they’re being filmed, “the high-tech specs have also turned into a liability, as some are calling the gadget ‘pervert glasses…’"
Some people are using the glasses — which look like a pair of regular spectacles — to record people without their knowledge and publish the videos on social media. The users secretly videotape and share what happens when they try to pick up women. Now, a growing number of people are worried they could be covertly recorded at the gym or even during sex. The backlash has prompted Meta to update its glasses to address privacy concerns, and some places have banned them, adding to the angst surrounding technology that’s rapidly evolving…

Concern about the glasses has exploded as more videos of interactions with people who don’t know they’re being recorded go viral on social media. On Instagram, some videos depict people getting approached in malls and grocery stores and on college campuses and sidewalks. While the videos are portrayed as jokes, the people filmed don’t appear to know they’re being recorded and sometimes seem uncomfortable, telling the strangers to leave them alone or stop harassing them. The outcry has spread beyond social media, with comedian Jimmy Kimmel calling the Meta devices “pervert glasses” on national television and singer Lorde telling concertgoers that smart glasses are “not sexy…”

Instagram, which is owned by Meta, has been disabling accounts and taking down some of these pickup or prank videos for violating the platform’s rules against harassment and bullying… Businesses are making their own calls about smart glasses. The 5 Point Cafe in Seattle, which banned Google Glass in the past, has banned Meta glasses from its diner and dive bar. “Leave your Meta-SpyBan Display at home, they are officially Ray-Ban-ned from all of our restaurants. We serve privacy, not side-eye surveillance,” a 2025 Instagram post from the business states.
An Android app that warns people if they’re being recorded has roughly 110,000 downloads in the last six months, according to the article. The app’s creator says it’s a “social problem” that “we don’t value privacy, that we feel entitled to use others for our entertainment or our private gain, and technology amplifies that.”

The American Civil Liberties Union and more than 70 organizations even sent a letter urging Meta to promise they’d leave facial recognition features out of their smart glasses, according to the article. But a Meta spokesperson said “no final decision has been made.”

Re:During Sex?

By dskoll • Score: 4, Funny Thread

Mark Zuckerberg

glasshole 2.0

By bloodhawk • Score: 3 Thread
We saw this with google glassholes, why would Meta expect anything else. wearing these in public is just inviting confrontations and by the sounds of things deservedly so.

AI Reviews Bring ‘New Normal’ to Linux Release Candidates: Lots of Bug Fixes

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Linux Torvalds expects Linux 7.2 should be released next weekend “unless something really bad pops up,” Torvalds said while announcing today’s release candidate.

But there’s something interesting about Linux 7.2-rc7, writes Phoronix. “By the time the Linux kernel typically hits a -rc7 release things have usually settled quite well. But in today’s world of AI/LLM coding/review agents, the kernel activity continues at an all-time high.”
Tons of bug fixes continued to trickle in across the kernel spectrum for all sorts of issues. The HWMON hardware monitoring subsystem saw several critical and high severity bug fixes, on the memory management side was a nasty race condition leading to a use-after-free in the kernel for the past eight years, Btrfs restored its fixup worker infrastructure to deal with silent data loss, lots of AI patches in the networking realm, and the kernel was patched for the Safe RET Interrupt Vulnerability.

Linus Torvalds wrote in the 7.2-rc7 announcement:


“Another week, another -rc.

I can’t say that I’m exactly thrilled about the size of this all, but it is what it is: the new normal with a lot of fixes, many of them due to review by various AI tools.

And nothing looks particularly scary per se — it’s just that there’s a lot here. Most of it is fairly small, although we have a couple of larger diffs: s390/zcrypt fixes stand out in the diffstat, and so does btrfs bringing back the fixup worker infrastructure. And some netfilter ipset fixes.

But aside from a few places like that, most of this is just lots of tiny fixes. It’s pretty much spread all over — drivers (gpu, sound, networking, you name it), filesystems, core networking, arch code…

Flock Accused of Reactivating Its Cameras Without Notifying a Town

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
A Massachusetts newspaper reports that officials from the town of Littleton (population: 10,141) “claim that five of Littleton’s Flock Safety cameras were switched back on by the company without informing the town…”

Littleton had temporarily disabled the cameras earlier this year, according to the article, but upon discovering the cameras were still active, city officials say they directed the Town Counsel “to initiate cancellation of the contract with Flock Safety and directed the Town Administrator to coordinate the removal of the six cameras on public ways” with the Department of Public Works.

Ironically, it’s the same Massachusetts town that last year was breached by a Chinese-state-sponsored hacking group for over 300 days.

Flock has also considered dashcams installed in hundreds of thousands Uber, Lyft, and delivery drivers’ vehicles “to scan license plates those drivers travelled passed,” reports 404 Media, “essentially turning Uber and Lyft drivers into roaming surveillance vehicles, according to a Flock presentation shared with 404 Media… 404 Media first revealed the intended partnership last August when multiple sources provided information on the plan.”

Put a locked bag over them.

By hwstar • Score: 5, Funny Thread

The city should duffel bag and padlock all the cameras with something similar to what you used to find on parking meters out of service.

Only response

By sjames • Score: 3 Thread

This is a job for…SAWZALL MAN!

cue heroic music

Lets think about that

By PPH • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Town contracts with Flock to provide ALPR functions. Flock gets the appropriate pole rental contracts and installs cameras. City has a change of heart and asks that the cameras be shut off. Flock does so, but then is contacted by another customer interested in the data feed. Flock says, “The cameras are already up. Just turn them on and serve the new contract.”

A couple of things come to mind:

California City Declares State of Emergency After Cyberattack

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
NBC Bay Area brings news from the small idyllic California town of Suisun City (population: 29,518). The city council “declared a state of emergency Saturday after a cyberattack that shut down computer systems including 911 public safety operations.”
“Malicious software infected and compromised” the East Bay community’s information technology systems beginning about 5:45 a.m. Friday, the city said on social media. “The cybersecurity incident hit critical public safety operations, including 911 routing, police and fire dispatch, records and city services,” the city said.

“There is no imminent threat to the public,” the city said. “All public safety services remain active.” The city shut down its computer network “to contain the threat and preserve evidence for a federal investigation,” it said… Suisun City dispatchers were taking calls for service through the Solano County dispatch center. Suisun City police officers and firefighters continued responding to calls for service, the city said, but online city services and internal operations were unavailable.
On Facebook the city said it was “working alongside federal, state and regional agencies, including the FBI, Department of Homeland Security and California Office of Emergency Services to maintain emergency services, investigate the incident and restore systems.”

But Bay Area PBS station KQED notes “They’re only the latest local government in the region to be hit by a cyberattack.”
Earlier this year, Foster City and Pittsburg experienced other cyberattacks that impacted services in their own jurisdictions. Foster City declared a state of emergency after a March ransomware incident that shut down many services for more than a week. Pittsburg lost almost $1 million to a February phishing attack, though over half of it was recovered.

AI-Powered Browser Just Generates Every Website From Scratch

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
XDA Developers reports:
On July 22, a Google DeepMind engineer, Vidy Thatte, shared a snippet of a browser he built that “treats every URL as a prompt and generates a site from scratch” on his X account. Just a few days later, he shared a TestFlight link to let iPhone users try it for themselves. The browser he launched is called Gem, and it’s a browser that doesn’t really…browse.

Instead of fetching a webpage from a server the way Chrome or Safari would, Gem hands whatever URL you type over to Google’s Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite model and asks it to generate a webpage on the spot. If you enter a real address, it builds its own interpretation of that site rather than loading the actual thing. If you enter an address that doesn’t exist, Gemini simply invents a website to fill the gap. In other words, you’re not visiting the internet so much as browsing one the model dreams up as you go…

Thatte’s reasoning was that with a model as fast and cheap as Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite, there’s almost no practical difference anymore between loading a website and generating a brand-new one on the fly… Given that this tool is powered by Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and it’s just a side project rather than a full-fledged tool, it doesn’t come with Gemini access baked in. Gem requires you to bring your own Gemini API key to get it working. Every URL you enter fires off a request to the model, so Gem needs a key linked to your Google account to actually generate anything, with the usage billed to you. You can grab a key for free from Google AI Studio, paste it into Gem’s settings, and you’re ready to start typing URLs. While you can get started for free, I ran into the limits within two minutes of playing around. So, I did need to enable billing on my API key and decided to load $10 into it.
While the blogger’s own site seemed to only get the Gemini logo, tapping it revealed nearly two dozen remixing options. (Dark mode, Reader, Neubrutalist, Broadsheet, Blueprint, Comic book, Punk zine, Notebook, Chalkboard, Receipt, Teletext, System 7, Wes Anderson, Cyber neon, Clay, Frosted, Geocities, Matrix, Museum, Windows 95, Terminal, Vaporwave, and Hide images…) “The frontend morphed before my eyes. Every new edit took practically no time to load, and within a second or two, the same XDA articles would reappear wearing a completely different skin…” For another site, it kept the article headlines, but then rewrote all the text!

And after entering an address they knew didn’t exist — their own name — in two seconds the browser whipped up a slick portfolio “genuinely been better than some of what those tools produced with far more time and context to work with.” But its link to a LinkedIn profile led to a lookalike page, because Gem “had simply generated its own version of it, complete with a made-up follower number and details I never wrote....”

Not sure if this already exists but

By know-nothing cunt • Score: 5, Funny Thread

www.chickscoveredincheddar.com

matrix

By roman_mir • Score: 3 Thread

Have you ever had a dream, Neo, that you were so sure was real? What if you were unable to wake from that dream? How would you know the difference between the dream world and the real world?

yeah, sure, whatever

By bistromath007 • Score: 3 Thread

old: dead internet theory

bold: dead internet mandate

A mildly fun way to waste energy…

By ffkom • Score: 3 Thread
… but other than toying around with such tool, I cannot see any real use case.

I guess next up is a phone where whatever number you dial, the number will be used as a seed for a randomly generated AI “personality” to talk to.

And of course you can extend that concept to live TV (with unlimited number of channels) as well, if you really want to burn through “tokens” at maximum speed.

Gee, Mister Plato, that’s a neat cave!

By Anaerin • Score: 3 Thread
Sure is looking like shadows on the wall, though…

Ask Slashdot: What are the Costs of Switching Between Windows, MacOS, and Chrome?

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
UI changes, lost productivity, untransferrable knowledge… Long-time Slashdot reader theodp notes the folly of switching to an unfamiliar new environment to be “more productive”…
Champions of the switch often insist workers will be able to hit the ground running and get the same or even more work done from the get-go in the new unfamiliar environment because it’s ‘more productive’, a conclusion often shaped by conventional wisdom or their ‘gut’ feeling. Decision makers may also mistake their own ‘light-user experience’ for universal experience and believe all platforms are fungible.

And while it’s one thing for a business to delay their delivery dates and increase costs of by introducing a switch in computing environments that’s of unquantified and possibly dubious value, how about when a switch in computing environments is made that affects schoolchildren’s ability to learn for a period of time?

While a MacBook Neo is indeed cute, what might be the possible consequences of a decision to move 25,000 students off Windows and onto MacBook Neos…? Or even the impact on a single kid who moves from a MacBook school to a Windows or Chrome school (or whose home computing environment isn’t aligned with their school). Or students whose teachers decide learning in their classrooms should now additionally require an understanding of the Minecraft computing platform/UI (used in over 40,000 school systems.). Learning Management Systems and now various AI Edtech tools used by schoolkids are also subject to change.
“Even if students and schools eventually benefit from a new platform, one wonders how much learning is lost during the switch,” theodp asks, “and what the financial and educational ROI and payback period look like.” Are there bigger problems than we realize? Share your own thoughts and experiences in the comments.

What are the costs of switching between Windows, MacOS, and Chrome?

Re:Linux?

By Retired Chemist • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
And probably eat it all up in downtime and support costs, because most schools do not have anyone capable of managing a Linux install.

Reimplementation costs

By Petersko • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

For companies with a complete set of supporting infrastructure, you must include the costs of standing up the whole structure, less licensing costs of the current ecosystem.

- Automated distribution and patching tools
- Standardized software
- Imaging tools for provisioning

Not to say it’s still not worth it. It could be. But the larger the org, the greater the inertia, and the longer you live with both ecosystems.

Switching is unavoidable

By SoftwareArtist • Score: 4, Informative Thread

He kind of answered his own question. Kids move between schools all the time. People move between companies all the time. Either you dictate that everyone in the world must use the same environment, or else people will sometimes have to change environments.

Sure there’s a cost to switching. You shouldn’t do it without a good reason. You also shouldn’t be afraid to do it when there is a good reason. You’re trading a short term cost for a long term benefit.

There also is value in knowing multiple platforms. I didn’t like it when I was at a company that had standardized on Windows for everything, but there have been lots of times since then when it was useful to have learned Windows. There’s educational value in occasionally being forced to learn a new platform.

It really depends what people are doing

By 93 Escort Wagon • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

In our department, the vast majority of our staff do 90% of their work in a web browser. A handful use a separate email program (Outlook, unfortunately), but most are in Gmail. They also occasionally use MS Office, but that software’s crappy interface is equally bad regardless of platform. So I have a hard time believing switching them to Macs or Linux boxes would have any deleterious impact on their productivity, except perhaps in the very short term as they learn the OS’ interface.

And, since we do have a number of users on Macs already… it’s not as if our desktop admins would be dealing with an unfamiliar management setup.

Our group’s desktop admins are considering making this switch right now, actually. It’s got nothing to do with “increasing productivity”, it comes down to per-unit costs plus positive experiences with those staffers who are already on Macs. The group has been long-time Dell customers on the Windows side, and what I’m hearing from them is that Dell’s business laptops have gotten more expensive than the equivalent Macs. FWIW they have various reasons they’ve rejected Dell’s competitors in the Windows space.

I do not believe that at all.

By jdawgnoonan • Score: 3 Thread
The kids using Chromebooks are not running anything that Windows, Linux, or Mac could not run just as easily in a web browser. In that case the kids will not be losing any time as launching a PWA is the same on any of these platforms.

Slashdot Reader Builds ‘Spaced Linux’, a New Devuan-Based, User-Friendly Desktop Distro

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“I’ve been a Linux IT administrator for 30 years now,” says crhylove (Slashdot reader #205,956), in a new video on his YouTube channel. “I used to be a data center architect, at one point I was the IT director for 13 school districts… I just haven’t been happy overall with all the other operating systems out there… "
I’ve been working really diligently for the last few weeks on a new distro called Spaced Linux that is exactly what I want to use. It’s heavily focused on the [zoom-friendly 3D] Compiz desktop, very efficient using the rolling Devuan Ceres backend, and avoids dependency hell by promoting mostly Flatpak usage.

It’s still early, but it’s already working great for me, it’s been my daily driver for a few weeks now.
There’s also user-friendly themes — everything from Linux, Android, GeoWorks, and Mac OS X to Windows 11, Windows XP, and even Windows 3.11 (dark or light theme). And you can also run Windows apps under Wine. “And let me tell you, Nvidia runs perfectly on here now…” he adds in the video. “It just works really, really well out of the box.”

He’s now working on voice-command features, bur argues that Spaced Linux “is already extremely usable, extremely efficient, extremely fast, and extremely reliable.... And it’s only going to get better and better.”

Relavant XKCD comic

By leonbev • Score: 5, Informative Thread

https://xkcd.com/927/

I mean, we shouldn’t shame the guy for making his own custom Linux distribution. But did we really didn’t need yet another one? Why can’t these things just be an add-on package to an existing distribution, instead of fragmenting the Linux ecosystem even more?

Mostly flatpak?

By cshark • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Nice, so now… I can sleep well with the confidence that my home directory can will get corrupted and my entire os might become useless just because. And that I’ll have no warning about any of it until my entire os catches fire, because there aren’t any meaningful logs anywhere.

Here for it.
This is the change we needed.

Spaced Linux

By PPH • Score: 3 Thread

Can we still use tabs?

Lost me at “Flatpak”

By jenningsthecat • Score: 3 Thread

… avoids dependency hell by promoting mostly Flatpak usage.

I’m glad that crhylove brought something to the party, but I won’t be partaking. I fully sympathize with the desire to avoid dependency hell, but in my experience AppImage is the only format that does that cleanly, reliably and painlessly.

Yes, heavy reliance on AppImages chews up disk space - and also memory, if you’re using a lot of apps which under traditional package management systems share libraries. But they’re clean, and they generally don’t break when the system is updated and libraries change. The onus is on the user to keep them up-to-date, and I can live with that.

I’m not hugely experienced here, so this is just an opinion: if you want to avoid dependency problems, AFAICT AppImages are the best choice. That said, in my limited experience, Flatpaks are at least less problematic than Snaps.

OpenAI Announces It’s Enhancing Security Controls, Pausing Some Work for New AI Model Astra

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
OpenAI announced Friday it’s pausing work on its Astra AI model because of security concerns. The Guardian reports:
The company had evaluated the agent, Astra, and found “significant advancements in agentic coding and cybersecurity”, which had moved to a “critical” threshold… OpenAI stated that the model was not involved in an incident in which one of its AI agents went rogue during a test, accessed the open web and hacked a startup, Hugging Face… The reports have increased concerns about advancements in AI models and humans’ ability to control them.

Still, critics of the AI industry have warned that such disclosures from OpenAI and its competitors Anthropic and Meta could be designed to generate hype about the technology’s power and thus spur additional interest from investors.

To prevent potential rogue behavior from AI agents, OpenAI is “implementing stricter security controls for higher-capability models and associated activities, including isolated testing environments, restricted network and tool access”, the company’s blogpost stated. It will also install “enhanced model weight protections and encryption, additional monitoring and detection capabilities”. The company will pause internal activities involving Astra that do not meet these new requirements.
“We believe it’s important to be transparent with the public and the safety and security communities about this potential shift in capabilities…” OpenAI wrote in a blog post titled "Responding to the next frontier of critical cyber capabilities.”
Under our Preparedness Framework, a model reaches the Critical cybersecurity threshold if it can identify and develop functional zero-day exploits of all severity levels in many hardened real-world critical systems without human intervention, or can devise and execute end-to-end novel strategies for cyberattacks against hardened targets given only a high level desired goal. While we continue to benchmark and assess this model, our preliminary evaluations indicate strong enough performance that we cannot rule out Critical capability level at this time… Accordingly, we have scaled up robustness testing of our safeguards and security controls so that they are appropriate for a deployment of these capabilities…

- We are implementing stricter security controls for higher-capability models and associated activities, including isolated testing environments, restricted network and tool access, enhanced model weight protections and encryption, additional monitoring and detection capabilities, and sandboxed execution.

- We are pausing internal activities involving Astra that do not yet meet these strengthened security control requirements.

- We have implemented universal monitoring for risky actions and misalignment across all agentic applications of Astra, including training and evaluation. Monitors evaluate the model’s Chain of Thought and trigger a security response to review and interrupt high risk activity.

- We will work with relevant government agencies and select AI safety organizations to test the capabilities for this model…

We believe advanced cyber-capable models should help defenders identify and address vulnerabilities before attackers do. We’re committed to working alongside governments, safety institutes, and civil society to ensure that the frontier capabilities of models like Astra, and those that follow, are deployed responsibly and broadly for the benefit of all humanity.

O no

By liqu1d • Score: 3 Thread
Another big scary AI model that does things totally unseen before. We should all be both terrified and ready to open our wallets.

Just an ad to keep the hype train on the tracks

By Inglix the Mad • Score: 3 Thread
First: They don’t think - there is no will or independence.

Second: Wow, isn’t it amazing that whenever the questions start about AI that they suddenly have a new doom troll?

Third: Why are humans still programming? Dario said Claude would be programming EVERYTHING as of a few months ago.

Fourth: Where is the white collar JOBSPACOLYPSE?

Fifth:What is the ROI?

Last: Who actually believe Elon’s hype anymore? This crap about “DATACENTERS IN SPPAAACCCCEEEEEE!!!!!!!” flies in the face of not just materials science but physics.

Double Duty

By Casandro • Score: 3 Thread

There are probably 2 reasons to announce that:

a) generate more hype (our system is so good, it’s scary)

b) slow down the process of setting money on fire, as you pause spending it.

Brain Activity Reveals the Melodies That People Imagine

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Researchers believe they’ve found evidence that brain signals reveal the pitches of notes in imagined musical melodies, reports Medical Express:
Study participants were 10 epilepsy patients with electrodes on the surfaces of their brains for clinical monitoring. Participants quietly listened to the first bars of children’s tunes, then imagined the melodies of subsequent bars before humming their imagined melodies. Brain activity from the patients carried information about relative pitches within the imagined melodies. Combining note-level pitch predictions over time allowed the research team to recreate melodic changes that reflected the structure of the imagined songs…

“The model we created decodes relative pitch classes — such as do, re, mi, fa, sol, and la — rather than exact, absolute pitches,” [said tudy co-lead Jii Kwon of Seoul National University]. “This is useful because people often recognize melodies by the relationships between notes, even when the same melody is played in a different key.”

Let’s not go too far on this

By Z80a • Score: 3 Thread

Because i don’t want to get a copyright strike for playing songs in my head

GNOME Receiving Additional Design Help From Germany’s Sovereign Tech Agency Fellowship

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
The new GNOME Boxes app for accessing virtual systems has reached beta, announced This Week in GNOME. There’s also been more work on the Sushi file previewer for Nautilus, and Papers 51 Beta can now add visual signatures to PDF documents.

But Phoronix noted one more announcement. “Germany’s Sovereign Tech Agency announced earlier this year a new fellowship program and now as part of that, for the next two years GNOME has a fellow dedicated to working on design and community management… paid to help developers with design feedback and reviews, mock-up creation, and other GNOME design related efforts…”

From the blog post by GNOME Design Team member Philipp Sauberzweig:
I have been contributing to GNOME design as a volunteer for several years… I believe that it’s essential for a free and democratic society to ensure free and independent access to these technologies. To achieve this goal, end-user devices based on free and open-source software are key, and the GNOME desktop and its app ecosystem offer a powerful alternative to proprietary platforms… This two-year fellowship is a great honor and marks a significant change in my life. It is a unique opportunity for me to devote my skills and experience entirely to a project I strongly believe in.

During my two-year fellowship, I will support GNOME maintainers and developers with design feedback and reviews, create mockups, and coordinate efforts to standardize design patterns. My other activities focus on lasting improvements through two strategic initiatives: expanding the design community to increase capacity and enhancing our design tooling to reduce overhead and simplify onboarding… To attract new contributors, I will increase the visibility of design work by writing regular blog posts, giving presentations, and running workshops at conferences and hackathons. New contribution opportunities for newcomers will be created with clear instructions for independent activities such as collecting state-of-the-art examples, running accessibility and user tests, and creating mockups. Design reviews will be used as mentorship opportunities, pairing regular design contributors with experienced designers for peer review and knowledge sharing…

If you’re interested in contributing to GNOME design, check out the Design Team page on the Welcome to GNOME website, familiarize yourself with the Human Interface Guidelines, and join our Matrix channel. If you’re a GNOME developer feel free to reach out to me via Matrix and involve me in design reviews.
Jakub Beránek from the Rust compiler and infrastructure team also earned a fellowship in Germany’s Sovereign Tech program, focusing on improving the Rust toolchain’s tooling and infrastructure for Rust’s developers.

Other fellows include Pablo Neira Ayuso (Linux kernel maintainer for the Netfilter subsystem), CPython core developer Stan Ulbrych, and Python core developer Hugo van Kemenade, FreeBSD contributor Alexander Ziaee.

the only science-based UI?

By buchner.johannes • Score: 4, Informative Thread

As far as I know, the GNOME project has been the only Linux graphical shell that actually performs systematic studies of the user experience, and based on this, changes the interface. Testing how users are able to figure out a system is crucial, especially watching people (without helping them) who have never worked with Linux before.

This is a very different axis to most Linux developers building UIs based on what they feel like, which is most of what we read about on slashdot.
This is a very different axis to experienced users who have an emotional reaction when things change, which is where most of the software building energy goes.

GNOME indeed has a very nice interface design guide (likely originally inspired by Apple, but they evolved themselves), that you can consider for your own non-GNOME projects.

I like GNOME’s systematic approach, and great to see that Germany is putting money to these efforts.

Flock Camera Vandalism Continues Around America, While 100 Communities Reject ALPRs

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Dozens of Flock cameras have been vandalized around Dallas Texas in the last six months, reports a local news station. In Utah, ABC News reports, a county sheriff’s office even said Wednesday a Flock camera was even vandalized within days of its being installed. And in the Minnesota city of Winona, “Every Flock license plate reader camera operated by the Winona Police Department has been sawed off and stolen in what investigators believe was a coordinated theft,” according to local media:
All eight cameras were taken August 1, according to the Winona Police Department. A patrol officer first noticed the cameras had not sent any alerts in 24 hours. When officers checked the locations, they found the cameras had been cut from their poles and taken. The poles were left behind. Two additional Flock cameras on the Mississippi River Bridge, owned by Buffalo County, were also stolen in the same manner…

The thefts are part of a broader national trend. Flock cameras have been vandalized and cut down in communities across the country.
When someone in Florida filmed a damaged Flock camera lying in the grass in Florida, their footage attracted 980,000 views on social media, according to a local news report, with the uploader saying “Most of the people that are commenting are against Flock cameras.” But that report adds it’s one of at least five cameras recently damaged just in Florida:

- In another incident, investigators “found the black camera and its pole lying on the ground.”

- Two days later, sheriff’s deputies found a camera destroyed “with pieces scattered on the ground. Deputies reported the damage appeared to have been caused by a blunt object.”

- On July 31, “Police said two camera poles had been intentionally cut in half, causing an estimated $10,000 in damage to the system.”

In West Virginia 20-year-old Wesley Jackson has been arrested for allegedly vandalizing Flock cameras, with another 20-year-old (a university student) now arrested for being his accomplice, according to a local news report. Ironically, Jackson’s arrest was made possible partly by information from… automated license plate readers.

But the Washington Post notes there’s now a flood of Facebook commenters jokingly offering to provide a fake alibi:
“Couldn’t have been him — we were out counting blades of grass,” said one of the 29,000 commenters on a post about the arrest from the local news station WDTV. Others attested that the man, Wesley Jackson, had been helping them “replace the roof on a homeless shelter,” “playing halo 2,” “changing the tires” on their car or giving their “doggie a treat” at the time the cameras were destroyed.
Meanwhile, the anti-surveillance group DeFlock reports 100 communities have now rejected automated license plate readers. Wednesday an Arizona county sheriff explained to his local Board of Supervisors why he will not renew his office’s contract with Flock when it expires next month. Local Arizona media reports:
“We have a camera system that can do facial recognition technology and can start building a data set on what our citizens are doing on a day-to-day basis,” Teeple told supervisors. “That, in my training and experience, is a huge Fourth Amendment violation.”
Recently an Arizona man even told his city council he’d be launching AI-powered satellites to monitor “where government officials go, where they stop, who they meet with, and when they return home,” reports 404 Media:
It would be no different than how the city monitors its citizens using Flock cameras, he said… He said he’d already started compiling profiles on their vehicles, spouses vehicles, children’s vehicles, and planned to combine that data with Bluetooth signals, advertising IDs, and commercial data sources, “so our authorized users can replay the movements of every government official and their immediate family,” he said. Local businesses would be invited to join the network, to “protect” officials while they shop, eat at restaurants, and move around the city.
And CNET reports “a quiet battle is happening across the US" between “towns working to adopt Flock Safety systems and those trying to ban them entirely.”
From major cities like Los Angeles canceling its Flock contract to towns wrapping Flock AI cams in plastic bags because Flock won’t take them down, it’s a wild time for surveillance and questions about government accountability.

Re:Eight??

By RitchCraft • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Sounds like the freedom fighters need to get busy then.

Re:Over Reporting. Again.

By leonbev • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

It seems like the only the dramatic Flock camera destructions where they’re being cut down or dragged away by a truck are really getting reported. The ones where they are being silently destroyed by pointing a high power green laser at the camera sensor are not.

I can imagine that Flock doesn’t want people to know about how easily they can be disabled, so they aren’t really reporting that on the news.

Re:What a waste

By karmawarrior • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

You’re saying workers coops want to acquire more power? That trade unions want cameras on every street corner?

I appreciate that half the people here, probably because they’re American, think “socialismimsm means anything I don’t like that involves the government” but that’s not what it means. And the people self identifying as socialists in government right now, from AOC to Bernie, are not, actually, in favor of cameras on every street corner.

Some political parties, especially in Eastern Europe, identifying as socialist formed governments that were dictatorships. Others, such as those in Western Europe, were and still are democratic, and fought hard for your rights to be unrelated to your wealth.

I know it’s hard when you’ve been subjected to this kind of propaganda about socialists since you were capable of understanding English, but stop believing propaganda.

Re:What a waste

By jacks smirking reven • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

90% of hijackings, including Lockerbee and 9/11, were government intelligent funded psychological operations. Even the shoebomber was basically put there by the FBI.

The government wishes it was even 10% as powerful as you imagine it to be.

Re:Conditions of acceptance

By MikeDataLink • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

If the police were 100% trustworthy

It’s like Chris Rock said… “You can’t have good cops who support and protect bad cops. Because as long as that happens, there only exist bad cops.”

Quake Celebrates 30th Anniversary: New Official Episode With New Maps and Mechanics

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
To celebrate Quake‘s 30th anniversary, Bethesda released “a brutal new episode” — a new campaign chapter titled Dawn of the Machine “delivering ferocious combat, labyrinthine level design, and nightmarish realms that twist reality beyond recognition…”
Face deadly new twists on familiar foes, including the Rocket Ogre, Demo Dog, Blood Shambler, and more. Each variant introduces lethal new behaviours — from overwhelming firepower to explosive death traps — forcing you to rethink every encounter. Expand your arsenal with brutal variants inspired by classic Quake expansions, including the Super Axe — unleashing lightning on successive strikes — and the Laser Cannon, firing ricocheting projectiles that tear through enemies from every angle… Reality is never stable. Shift between dimensions to solve puzzles and navigate the world, or find hidden secrets scattered throughout the realms. Face enemies that rise again or transform after death, and experience encounters where the rules change without warning — forcing you to adapt or be overrun.
More details from Ars Technica:
This is part of a series of new campaign chapters, all developed by MachineGames “in collaboration with id Software.” MachineGames is best known for making the games in the relatively recent Wolfenstein reboot series, as well as Indiana Jones and the Great Circle. The Quake maps are made by a team dubbed “Quake Club,” which includes several MachineGames employees who work on Quake maps in their spare time.

The ambition and scope of some of these maps is beyond what was typical for Quake maps back in the late ‘90s, thanks in part to the team’s use of TrenchBroom, a newer map editor that works well on modern systems and is easier to work with and more capable than what folks were using in those days. There are 19 new levels, and they have several new gameplay gimmicks, like a time loop mechanic and a disorienting-but-cool teleportation system that makes it look like the levels are changing on the fly — kind of similar to the multi-time-period levels we saw in Titanfall 2 or Dishonored 2, though in these Quake maps the time shifts happen without player input. There’s also new music… The new maps have been added to the campaign list in the remastered version of Quake, and like that remaster, they’re available free to anyone who already owns Quake on Steam, as well as Quake on current and last-gen PlayStation, Xbox, and Nintendo consoles.

Only For The Listed Platforms

By ewhac • Score: 4, Informative Thread

The expansion pack is currently available only for the platforms listed. If you own Quake from GOG.com, the Epic Store, or own the original CD-ROM, you are, for the moment, SOL.

Shareware

By ThurstonMoore • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

I’ve still got my Quake shareware CD with NIN soundtrack.

Can’t wait to hear those two sweet words again.

By oogoliegoogolie • Score: 3 Thread

QUAD DAMAGE!

RAMageddon? 2027 Memory Capacity Reportedly Sold Out

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
IGN reports:
[A] new report suggests that all three memory manufacturers — Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron — have collectively sold through their 2027 memory manufacturing capacity to, you guessed it, AI companies.

According to a report from Digitimes and spotted by TweakTown, all DRAM and HBM capacity has been sold through for 2027, with no further supply planned. (The companies themselves have not yet confirmed this to be the case.) Of course, that only means that retail prices are going to go up even further in the near future. Selling through all the capacity for next year would be bad enough for consumers, but the problem is that most of the companies buying up this capacity have done so through long-term purchasing agreements, essentially pre-ordering memory that hasn’t even been manufactured yet over a five-year term. Unless more capacity opens up somewhere in the next few years, it’s hard to imagine that RAM will become more affordable and less scarce any time soon.

It’s not just memory that’s affected. According to that Digitimes report, NAND storage is growing in demand too. Luckily, NAND capacity hasn’t been completely absorbed, because there are more companies supplying the stuff. But it’s not exactly hard to see that SSDs have been growing steadily more expensive over the last six months or so.

Massively stupid

By Arnonyrnous Covvard • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

They’re just opening the doors wide for cheap Chinese memory, which will come, and then it will be RAMageddon for the cabal of manufacturers who so smugly announce that they’ve locked in obscene profits for years. With prices twice or more expensive than they need to be, there are many markets where it doesn’t matter that China can’t manufacture the same densities (yet). With enough money flowing in and this strategic opportunity given to them in a completely unforced fault, China will not take long enough to catch up for the established manufacturers to ramp up and do something about it.

Re:Massively stupid

By 93 Escort Wagon • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

They’re just opening the doors wide for cheap Chinese memory, which will come, …

… and (assuming this happens prior to 2029) then it will get banned in America. But at least other countries will be able to buy it.

Re:Massively stupid

By ukoda • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Meh, the USA is only about 20% of world trade, China will be happy to supply the other 80% of the world trade.

And now…

By LordHighExecutioner • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

…after that AI companies have been allowed to use your electricity, your water, and your land, they will be allowed to seize RAM from your laptop.

Re:Massively stupid

By caseih • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Chinese companies learn from the best (us). And they are only responding to demand. The blame for low-quality goods cannot be placed on China. The blame is squarely back here at home because low-quality, cheap goods are exactly what the American market is demanding, and demanding big time (Temu and Shein are wildly popular). No one wants high quality goods at higher cost. We all say we do, but in reality we don’t, and our buying habits just reinforce that. No you can’t blame China, sorry. The destruction of American industry is entirely a problem of our own system. American companies deliberately destroyed American manufacturing (and employment) in the name of short-term, quarterly profit. China didn’t cheat and steal our jobs: we gave it all to them on purpose. No amount of tariffs and taxes will change that.

And for the record, I’ve had to deal with poor quality goods made in the US as well. Cutting corners to save pennies applies just as much to American manufacturers (maybe even more so) as it does to Chinese manufacturers. For example, Eaton Cutler-Hammer electrical panels are the most flimsy things I’ve ever dealt with. Every possible cost was cut.

Google Should Still Be Forced To Shed Chrome, Advocacy Group Argues

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“Google should be required to divest the Chrome browser, and prohibited from paying Apple to distribute Google’s search engine, the nonprofit advocacy group Public Knowledge argues in a new court filing,” MediaPost reports, citing a friend-of-the-court brief filed Tuesday in the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals:
The group adds that “independent ownership” of Chrome “would open the distribution channel Google controls and allow Chrome to serve browser users when it makes privacy decisions and determines how to integrate search and (artificial intelligence)…”

In September 2025, [U.S. District Court Judge] Mehta issued a remedies order that requires Google to share some data about users’ searches with “qualified” competitors and to provide syndicated search results and ads to those competitors. The order also prohibits Google from entering into exclusive distribution contracts for Google Search, Chrome, Google Assistant and the Gemini app for six years, but allows the company to continue to make payments for search-ad revenue or distribution to Apple, Mozilla and others…

Google recently appealed Mehta’s order. The company argued in its written brief that it “prevailed in the marketplace fair and square,” adding that Apple and Mozilla “sensibly chose” Google as the default search engine “because it gave their users the best experience,” and because Apple and Mozilla would earn the most ad revenue through the deals. The [U.S.] Justice Department and states countered to the appellate court last week that the liability finding should stand, and also argued that Google should have been banned from paying Apple and Mozilla for placement as the default search engine on their browsers.

[Antitrust enforcers had originally asked the judge to order Google to divest Chrome, but he’s already rejected that request.] The government did not argue in its appellate papers that Google should be forced to sell Chrome. But Public Knowledge independently contends in its friend-of-the-court brief that divestiture would benefit consumers… “Divestiture would place those decisions with an institution whose success depends on serving browser users primarily....” The group is calling the appellate court’s attention to Google’s April 2025 decision to preserve tracking cookies — a reversal from its earlier plans to block third-party cookies by default. “Google is in the position of both deciding Chrome’s tracking rules while running the advertising business affected by them,” Public Knowledge writes. “An independent Chrome could make those decisions on behalf of users alone.”
But Firefox developer Mozilla filed its own friend-of-the-court brief Thursday warning Firefox could be forced to “exit the browser and browser engine markets” if it can’t receive payment from Google for distributing its search engine, according to a later report from MediaPost:
Federal and state antitrust enforcers recently asked the appellate court to reverse the portion of Mehta’s order that allows those payments to continue. But Mozilla counters in its new friend-of-the-court brief that Mehta’s decision regarding those payments was supported by the evidence —including a study it conducted concluding that its revenue would “decline dramatically” if forced to replace Google with Bing as Firefox’s default search engine… Google is expected to file new arguments with the appellate court next month.

No good outcomes for Chrome here.

By Gravis Zero • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Let’s just game out how divesting would go.
1. Chrome is bought by another megacorp (e.g. Microsoft) and is then equally used to screw over users.
2. Chrome is bought by a medium-sized company that fails to recognize the level investment it requires and they make bad choices or sell it to someone else.
3. Chrome is bought by a small company that MUST make money from Chrome and adds a bunch of shitty stuff to it and Chrome starts dying.

The best outcome you are going to get is Chrome dying a slow death and most people fleeing to other chromium forks which likely mean Microsoft absorbing most users. Given what they have written about why to divest, it seems they are hoping for a nonexistent possibility where greed is not the driving factor.

Re:No good outcomes for Chrome here.

By sourcerror • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

4, OSS comminity developed model, like Firefox or Debian. But fundrasising would be hard, FF only survived so far because of Google’s money in the first place (search engine placement).

Re:Side effects

By Aighearach • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Mozilla could also simply become un-captured, and instead of a giant paycheck machine for managers and executives, it could go back to being an association of developers with a common interest. Supported by individual donations.

The budget would be smaller, but the output might increase in quality. And the number of new lines of code that are just feature thrash could potentially be reduced.

Big techs’ “browser problem”

By xack • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
This is like the little red hen here, but KDE and Mozilla did all the initial hard work, and Apple, Brave, Google, Microsoft and Opera hijacked it all to add advertising and tracking, with security holes that are now being ultra-exposed by new AI vulnerability finders. The browser industry even relies on security holes in their own products, just ask the billions of people scanned by Cloudflare to prove their so called “humanity” and the millions of false positives locking them out of their own websites (especially disabled and neurodiverse people).

But I’ve also lost patience with Mozilla, their managers and devs are struggling to keep up with modern browser standards and the amount of security holes in Gecko, while wasting donator’s money on redesigns, widgets and football team sponsorships so it looks like Chromium will be even more entrenched.

The browser industry is incredibly toxic, with browser memory usage coming under increased scrutiny in the ram crisis. We need to critically evaluate the HTML, Javascript, CSS and the other standards in the browser katamari and start having some common sense because right now the browser is the most dangerous component of an operating system.

I’ve been commenting on the browser industry since before Mozilla even brought out Phoenix and before Safari came to MacOS X, we have created a monster with browser tech.

Back to the Open Source

By allo • Score: 3 Thread

Firefox should “exit the browser market” and become a contributor driven open source project again without CEOs who earn millions. Other projects work on small(er) budgets as well, why does Firefox need to be a huge corporation instead of a open source project? They even did things like donating to other projects. Fine if they have the money, the smaller projects had use for it, but why does Mozilla have so much money left to donate if they tell use they starve? Firefox problem is not Google, but their misguided vision to become a large corporation instead of just a working open source project.

Slashdot Reader Builds a Photo-Verification App for iPhones

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot
Long-time Slashdot reader BrianFagioli is announcing that he’s released a new iPhone app that creates a cryptographic witness for photos without uploading the original image.
The app hashes the file, signs the hash using a dedicated identity stored in Apple Keychain, and publishes the witness to Nostr relays while keeping the photo inside the app unless the user chooses to export it.

Rather than trying to determine whether a scene was genuine, the app — named Veridenz — answers a narrower question, by verifying whether a photo file matches the one that was originally witnessed. Users do not need a Nostr account because the app creates its own signing identity, keeping private documentation separate from a public Nostr profile.
“The developer does not collect any data from this app,” says its page in Apple’s iPhone store. The app’s tagline is “Capture. Prove. Verify.”

What kind of hash?

By anomaly256 • Score: 3 Thread
Is it a hash of the actual file, or a perceptual hashing of the image scene? The former would be quite fragile as so many things can alter an image file without altering the image per se, like compression or metadata stripping when uploading the file. Perceptual hashing would verify the authenticity of the scene itself and should survive file conversion and some amount of compression.

I did not build Veridenz only for investigators or attorneys. I was thinking about ordinary situations where stronger documentation could become useful later. Contractors could document completed work, while landlords and tenants could record the condition of an apartment. Homeowners might capture insurance damage, delivery workers could document drop-offs, and online sellers could photograph valuable items before shipping them. Photographic& Digital Arts

This sounds like perceptual hashing would be more useful, specially since the use cases mentioned are unlikely to have proper chain of custody processes for evidence handling without accidentally altering image files during upload / exchange

Re:The people who need this, don’t need a iPhone a

By test321 • Score: 4, Informative Thread

The C2PA (Coalition for Content Provenance and Authenticity) standard is integrated into all high-end cameras already, starting by Sony since 2021; and in smartphones there is the Pixel 10.

Re:What kind of hash?

By Aighearach • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Of course it’s fragile. That’s the point.

No, you’re not comprehending.

A fragile hash is almost useless. For example, you hash an image, then upload it somewhere. Somebody else saves the file, and without intentionally modifying it, uploads it to social media. Somebody checks the hash, and it’s different, because all the social media sites re-encode the images to save bits.

Whereas, a more sophisticated perceptual hash would identify the plagiarism.

This is the type of argument made by someone who has a vested interest in tampering with evidence.

If you’re gonna be an asshole, it helps not to also be a moron at the same time.