Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Cisco Gives Engineer Unlimited AI Tokens To Rewrite Legacy Code
  2. Apple Is Entering Its Slop Era
  3. Meta Settles Another Social Media Addiction Case Just Before Trial
  4. Sam Altman Thinks Your PC Is Wasting Precious RAM
  5. Thousands of ‘Ghost Students’ Use AI to Steal Millions In Student Loans, DOJ Says
  6. US Tech Stocks See Sharp Falls As AI Spending Nears $1 Trillion
  7. GM Reaches $220 Million Settlement Over Selling Drivers’ Private Data
  8. UK Social Media Ban May Lock Out More Than 100,000 Teens Without ID
  9. Reddit Will Force Everyone to Log In
  10. Binance Suffers Biggest Crypto Hack In History With $6.3 Billion Affected [UPDATE]
  11. The Tragedy of Losing Your Wikipedia Page
  12. First Wired XR Glasses Powered By Android XR
  13. Proton CEO Is In ‘Full AI Psychosis’
  14. Polymarket Halted International Trading After Hackers Drained Accounts
  15. Trump’s CTFC Steps In to Defend Kalshi As Utah Brings Criminal Charges Against Execs

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Cisco Gives Engineer Unlimited AI Tokens To Rewrite Legacy Code

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Fortune:
Gen Z can’t catch a break. Entry-level jobs are vanishing; some 40% of bosses say they plan to hire fewer grads because AI can do the job cheaper, and young workers are routinely slammed for showing up late and refusing to put in overtime for free. Cisco’s president and chief product officer Jeetu Patel isn’t buying it — he’s just handed one of the company’s biggest jobs to a 27-year-old he found hidden in the org chart “five levels” below him. “I’ve given him unlimited tokens because he’s going to refactor code,” Patel told Fortune at a small roundtable dinner. “So I’m like, you can go, you can go nuts.”

The “him” is Padmanabhan Krishnamurthy, or “Paddy,” as Patel affectionately calls him. He joined Cisco in 2025 after the $429 billion tech giant acquired EzDubs, the real-time translation startup Krishnamurthy cofounded in 2023. And despite coming in as a former founder with CEO experience, he was, in Patel’s words, “buried away in the organization doing something unstrategic.” That changed when Patel dropped into Cisco’s San Francisco office, and the pair got talking.

Krishnamurthy reckoned he could rewrite Cisco’s legacy code with a two-person team. Patel says even the most AI-forward people on his own team weren’t thinking that way. So he has given himself four weeks to prove it, with the final goal of rewriting 98% of Cisco’s legacy code within 24 months. Now, he’s on the hunt for more Paddys: young hires who will “challenge the system and the status quo,” or, as he puts it, be “an energizer bunny that just goes out and kind of revs everyone up.”
“The only way for us to keep accelerating is to make sure we’re surrounded by people with a broad range of experience,” said Patel. “Roughly one-third of my team is experienced, scaled operators who understand how the Cisco engine works. The second third are systems thinkers from the market who bring the outside-in perspective. And the final third is made of entrepreneurial founders, CEOs, and engineers who are AI-native who operate in founder mode.”
“Either of these groups by themselves aren’t nearly as potent as when all three work together. It’s what creates magic.”

Step up from their normal slop?

By Casandro • • Score: 3 • Thread

I mean Cisco is not exactly known for high quality software.It can’t get that much worse. For example, IOS famously left the TCP part of TCP/IP to be implemented by the process using it… and had no memory protection for quite some time.

Apple Is Entering Its Slop Era

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
In an opinion piece for 404 Media, Matthew Gault argues that Apple has entered its “slop era,” abandoning its reputation for innovative hardware in favor of recycled ideas and questionable design choices. Here’s an excerpt:
My ears perked up when I heard Apple’s new foldable phones were cracking. I licked my lips when the company announced it’s releasing a touch-screen laptop. This was a company that once charged $19 for a polishing cloth, asked $200 for a VESA mount, and sold $700 wheels for the Mac Pro. Now it’s borrowing tired ideas from its competitors and launching hardware its previous leaders rejected.

The once dominant company is struggling to find its feet in an AI-driven post-Tim Cook world. John Ternus is the new CEO — a 25 year veteran of the company with a track record of pushing harebrained hardware schemes like the much reviled Touch Bar and lawsuit inducing butterfly keyboard.

With Ternus at the helm, I feel there’s a good chance Apple’s best days are behind it, that it will have to make do with less, that it’s declasse. Apple, blindsided by AI and relying on crowdpleasing hardware gimmicks, is downwardly mobile. It’s in its slop era. The company that once asked consumers to “Think Different” is now releasing hardware that’s just like everything else on the market.

Multiple problems

By burtosis • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
The screen itself seems fine, however the hinge is failing and puncturing the screen. But worse, this teardown shows that the hinge lets in particles like sand with no actual sealing causing immediate failure. I’m not sure how any engineers could let this happen, this looks like idiot management and AI slop replacing actual skill.

“Entering”?

By 93 Escort Wagon • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

I use a lot of Apple gear, but frankly I’d argue they entered the era not long after Jobs died.

Re:Cracked screens

By b0s0z0ku • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
Here’s my question: what happens if you keep the phone in your pocket and a coin or key slips into the fold? Or are Apple users too cool to do cheugy things like pay with cash and use physical keys?

Rumors of my demise…

By Himmy32 • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

Apple is still the 1000 pound gorilla in the room with a CEO that’s been doing their design work for a long time. I mean it’s been a decade an a half since we’ve heard that the sky is falling for an Apple without Steve Jobs.

I might not be the largest Apple fan, but call me a little skeptical about hearing the company is dying. It didn’t happen when Tim Apple took away the headphone jack, released a stupid, expensive “iPhone pocket”, or a mixed reception VR Headset. Apple might not have the perfect AI assistant with Siri, but they haven’t over extended into revenue losing bubble either.

Ternus has been around look enough to understand that the goose mostly lays golden eggs. The goose probably isn’t cooked just because last egg doesn’t appear as shiny, even if calling it “slop” makes for a engagement driving news article.

Re:Damned if they do…

By ZombieCatInABox • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

For years now I’ve been hearing and reading people bitching that Apple didn’t add touch screens to their MacBook line.

Now they have. And people are still bitching.

Meta Settles Another Social Media Addiction Case Just Before Trial

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Meta has reached an undisclosed settlement in another social media addiction lawsuit, avoiding a trial scheduled for next month and leaving Snap as the sole remaining defendant. Engadget reports:
The lawsuit was brought by an 18-year-old woman from Mississippi known as K.D.B who, according to Reuters, has “described staying awake for hours scrolling social media, losing focus in class and engaging in self-harm using methods shown in social media videos.” Jury selection kicked off earlier this week in Los Angeles.

On Friday, K.D.B’s lawyer announced that she had reached a settlement with Meta after previously settling with TikTok and YouTube. “We remain committed to improving safety for kids on social media apps and holding tech companies accountable, and we are pleased to have brought this matter to a just resolution on behalf of our client,” attorney Emily Jeffcott said in a statement.

Now, Snap is the only remaining defendant in the case. CEO Evan Spiegel is expected to testify in the trial that could last several weeks. If he does take the stand, it will be the first time the Snap founder has appeared in a social media addiction trial. Snap previously settled in another high-profile case involving similar claims. A jury later ruled against Meta and YouTube in the trial and the two were ordered to pay $6 million in damages.

Sam Altman Thinks Your PC Is Wasting Precious RAM

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
“Looks like OpenAI CEO Sam Altman wants to own all the computing resources and rent out terminals to the world as a way of propping up his business plan, now that debt-ridden AI companies are teetering on the edge,” writes ancient Slashdot reader Gilmoure. Tom’s Hardware reports:
In an interview over beers with the YouTube channel Cheeky Pint, Altman said that local inference, and, by extension, people having DRAM in computers at home, is “quite terrible.” When discussing local inference on home computers with open-source models, Altman discussed the assumption that people will be able to run local AI on their own computers, the ones they may already own or want to build.

Then he explained why that’s a bad idea (at the 29-minute mark): “From a global allocation perspective, actually, it’s quite terrible to have everybody have a bunch of the world’s limited supply of DRAM sitting in their own computer and being used 5% of the time,” Altman said. “You want maximum utilization in the cloud if you’re trying to deal with this very supply-constrained environment. And somehow many people’s intuition is the opposite of that.”

While OpenAI does have some open-source models, its primary business is in closed-source models that run in data centers, so he’s really defending the company’s business model. OpenAI isn’t exactly threatened by some laptops and gaming rigs just yet, but local AI could mean people one day paying less for subscriptions to models like GPT-6 Luna if they have the power to run them at home. Altman’s talk suggests that the company would prefer that more RAM go to OpenAI’s data centers rather than home computers, which also sparks enthusiast fears of not being able to own your own hardware or software, but rather rent an agent and a computer in the cloud.

Sam Altman is wasting precious oxygen

By wickerprints • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Why should I care what this dumb asshole thinks? If he takes up entire world’s supply of RAM, then with what devices will we be able to presumably pay for the privilege to access his AI models? Is he really suggesting that we all go back to the days of running dumb terminals?

What is this CEO disease, where they all think that just because they run a company, that they are suddenly subject matter experts for every domain of knowledge that built said company? Like, somehow just by being in a leadership position, they suddenly have the knowledge of all the engineers, developers, and technicians who built the product, as if they built everything with their bare hands? And what is with this mass delusion that so many people—shareholders included—buy this absurd narrative?

Fuck this guy and fuck his arrogant “I’m the leader so I’m a visionary who can say and do no wrong” attitude. Put them all on a spaceship and blast them out of the solar system.

You don’t have a choice

By rsilvergun • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
He has billions of dollars and nearly limitless power. Whether you care what he thinks about your PC or not he gets to decide whether you get to have a PC or not.

You can’t keep letting people have limitless power and then just throw up your hands and say I don’t care. You can’t live in an alternate universe where they don’t exist and where they don’t have power over you. And you can’t just go somewhere they aren’t because virtually all the land capable of sustaining human civilization is full of people already and those people have to listen to Sam Altman and guys like him who have the billions and billions of dollars and limitless power people refuse to take away from them.

Politics affects your hobbies and your life whether you like it or not. I don’t care doesn’t make that go away. It’s just cope.

Low utilization

By sinij • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread
Sam is right about low utilization. I use my toilet only about 0.1% of the day, it has much higher throughput than I could ever realistically hope to utilize even after eating Taco Bell. I am very over-toileted.

Re:You don’t have a choice

By wickerprints • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

When someone says “I don’t care” in this context, it isn’t an expression of indifference, as if the issue doesn’t have any material impact on them. It’s an expression of DISDAIN. For example, when someone says “I don’t care what Trump thinks,” it is reasonable to infer that they mean that his thinking is fundamentally wrong and unworthy of discourse. That he is not someone whose thoughts are to be respected or regarded with any value.

We DO need to stop these arrogant sociopaths. And we do that by refusing to buy into the explotative ecosystems and false narratives they push on us. But let’s not read too literally into what is a common expression of frustration and twist its intended meaning.

Re:You don’t have a choice

By beelsebob • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

I’m guessing you paid significantly more for those computers than if Sam Altman had not been involved. For many people, his buying power is enough to simply disallow buying a computer at all.

Thousands of ‘Ghost Students’ Use AI to Steal Millions In Student Loans, DOJ Says

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
The Justice Department has charged five people in a crackdown on “ghost student” fraud, in which scammers allegedly use stolen identities and AI to enroll fake students in colleges, complete coursework, and collect federal student loan funds. Ars Technica reports:
In a press release Thursday, the Department of Justice said it had uncovered a large-scale scheme relying partly on AI. The DOJ seized more than $750,000 in cryptocurrency from “a network associated with Kenyan nationals” after data analysis helped flag likely fraudsters. Assistant Attorney General Colin M. McDonald of the DOJ’s National Fraud Enforcement Division credited new fraud-detection measures implemented by the Trump administration for the arrests. He said that “this is the first international seizure of its kind in Kenya,” while warning fraudsters that the crackdown has only just begun.

[…] At a press conference, McDonald was joined by FBI and Department of Education officials to explain how the scheme works. It starts with bad actors purchasing personally identifiable information (PII) of Americans — most frequently targeting high school graduates who never attended college and went straight into the workforce. Once they have that sensitive data, they fill out the Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA) while seeking to enroll in universities and community colleges. If accepted, student aid is distributed first to schools to cover tuition and fees, but any leftover money is deposited into bank accounts controlled by the fraudsters. Dozens of Americans have opened bank accounts to act as money mules for fraudsters, the DOJ said.

To keep money flowing, bad actors use AI to fill out applications, complete coursework, and even make it appear that a student is attending virtual sessions. “It looks like the ghost student is actually completing the class,” McDonald said at the press conference. “Some even create the appearance of a fake student in an online classroom to trick schools into believing a real person is present. The goal is to keep the ghost student in school for as long as possible, semester after semester after semester.” So far, the DOE has “identified over 830,000 potentially fraudulent federal student aid accounts created by using this PII of US citizens,” officials said at the press conference. If all those accounts are ghost students, total losses come close to $130 million, the DOJ said.

The Regime’s Numbers

By logjon • • Score: 3, Informative • Thread

identified over 830,000 potentially fraudulent federal student aid accounts created by using this PII of US citizens

This regime consistently pads its numbers by multiple orders of magnitude. It just as likely the actual number is 10.

Re:The Regime’s Numbers

By ArchieBunker • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

Meanwhile, what is Iran costing us daily?

So what?

By rsilvergun • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
Millions of dollars stolen is a tiny fraction of just the money Trump got to sell pardons.

I’m not saying that we shouldn’t stop fraud but if all you can come up with is a few million bucks there are much better places to go after fraud. Like how the IRS will go after you for forgetting to include the right paperwork for a deduction but they’ll cheerfully let Elon Musk skip paying billions of dollars of taxes he’s owing.

This is not an accident. People in power have long since set things up so that they don’t have law enforcement against them but you do.

Fascism requires an in group that the law protects but does not bind and an out out group that the law binds but does not protect. If you’re reading this you’re in the out group

It’s a distraction

By maladroit • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

This money went to a Trump donor:
“A Minnesota prison was for sale at $75M. ICE paid nearly $500M for it.
https://www.the-independent.co…

Meanwhile, from the summary:
So far, the DOE has “identified over 830,000 potentially fraudulent federal student aid accounts … IF all those accounts are ghost students, total losses come close to $130 million.
That’s a big fucking ‘if’.

US Tech Stocks See Sharp Falls As AI Spending Nears $1 Trillion

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
U.S. technology stocks plunged for a second consecutive day on Friday as investors grew increasingly concerned about the enormous cost of artificial intelligence development and whether those investments will pay off. The Nasdaq fell more than 3.5%, while Intel shares dropped as much as 30%, Reddit fell 26%, and Alphabet extended its losses after shedding more than $500 billion in market value Thursday. The BBC notes that Meta, Alphabet, Oracle, Amazon, and Microsoft have collectively committed to spending $800.6 billion on AI in 2026. From the report:
Chris Low, from investment management firm FHN Financial, said the bulk of what was happening in the stock market was in reaction to some of the biggest tech players such as Amazon and Google. He told Reuters the companies were “showing some pretty significant growing pains as they aggressively pursue the AI build-out.” “The thinking is that these signs suggest that the entire sector is going to slow down.”

Kathleen Brookes, research director at trading firm XTB, said there have been many ups and downs in AI trade in recent months. “Investors have turned ruthless, punishing any signs of disappointment in [third quarter] earnings,” she said. “The AI trade has had a good run in recent years, but now investors want payback, and companies like Alphabet and Intel are in the crosshairs.” […] Brookes noted that November is typically a strong month for stocks. “If we see AI stocks continue to struggle in the coming days, it could suggest the AI trade is past its peak, and investors will be looking for a new theme to drive markets,” she said.

Burn, baby, burn!

By b0s0z0ku • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

-950 points on the NASDAQ is a good start … hopefully it’s just getting started, and the fall will be 10x as hard after the techno-fascists’ enablers are dragged our of office kicking and squealing — election minus 4 days. Tick. Tock. Tick. Tock.

The entire concept of “disrupt things that actually make people money, make people happy, enshittify them, corporatize them, and turn them into surveillance machines” needs to be razed to the ground.

So far it’s just a minor correction

By Quakeulf • • Score: 4, Funny • Thread

Please wake me up when it’s over 20%.

AI is clearly profitable

By toxonix • • Score: 3 • Thread

Organizations all over the world are profiting from AI. It’s just not the organizations you’d like to have growing and making more money: Hackers and spies run by strategic enemies, scammers run by organized crime, the US President and his family, etc, etc..

GM Reaches $220 Million Settlement Over Selling Drivers’ Private Data

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from TechCrunch:
General Motors will pay $220 million to 36 states to settle allegations that it illegally sold private driving behavior and location information to data brokers. As part of the settlement, GM must get drivers’ express consent before it collects or shares their driving and location data — terms that are in line with separate agreements it previously reached with California and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). This settlement does contain a new requirement that GM must have a third party assess the automaker’s compliance with the privacy program it has put in place.

The agreement announced Thursday settles a lawsuit brought by a coalition of attorneys general from 36 states that alleged GM had sold the information to data brokers, which in turn then sold it to insurance providers. “This agreement addresses Smart Driver, a product we ended in 2024, and reinforces steps we’ve taken to strengthen our privacy practices,” GM said in an emailed statement. “Safer, more helpful and personalized experiences are enabled by connected vehicle data, and GM is committed to being clear about what information is used, how it’s protected, and the choices customers have about what they share.”

The settlement comes more than two years after a New York Times report showed how GM and OnStar collected, used, and sold drivers’ precise geolocation data and driving behavior to third parties, including data brokers LexisNexis and Verisk. The data was collected through GM’s Smart Driver program, a free feature contained within its connected car apps that tracked and rated driving behaviors and seat belt use. Data brokers sold this information to insurance providers, which could affect customers’ rates, the NYT reported at the time.

LexisNexis

By Himmy32 • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
The most depressing point of my tech career was sitting through a LexisNexis presentation and realizing how badly they are violating our privacy. Flock might be getting all the attention, but brokers like LexisNexis and their exploitation of the Third-Party Doctrine are the far greater threat to privacy.

Re:Soo…

By Valgrus Thunderaxe • • Score: 4, Funny • Thread
The lawyers will get $219,515,000.00 and you’ll get a coupon for 10% off an oil change at your local dealership.

Re:Ban it all!

By Cpt_Kirks • • Score: 4, Funny • Thread

Just make selling people’s data illegal and be done with it.

That will get rid of about 90% of the BS “Tech Companies”.

And make every Magnificent reason the stock market is corruptly captured by a whopping seven stocks null and void?

Be careful what you ask for. Your 401k just might get it.

That’s why I am 100% invested in buggy whips.

UK Social Media Ban May Lock Out More Than 100,000 Teens Without ID

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Under the UK’s planned social media ban, more than 100,000 British teenagers aged 16 and 17 could initially be locked out of social media because they lack a passport or driving license that may be needed as a fallback for age verification. The Guardian reports:
Ofcom, the UK’s online watchdog, said about 150,000 16- to 17-year-olds do not own a passport or driving licence, which are likely to be needed to access age-restricted platforms. The Australia-style ban on under-16s accessing social media services, including Instagram, TikTok and YouTube, is due to come into force next spring. The head of Ofcom, Melanie Dawes, said “motivated children” would seek to bypass the restrictions, as has happened in Australia.

On Thursday, Ofcom published an assessment of age verification measures that could underpin the ban, outlining four “highly effective” methods: checking a person’s official ID against a live selfie, a bank verifying an account holder’s age, an official digital ID service like the Young Scot card, or estimating someone’s age via a selfie. However, the watchdog said a form of official ID would probably be needed as a “backstop” for other methods, such as facial age estimation, which could be inaccurate by several years. Ofcom said a cohort of 16- to 17-year-olds could miss out as a result. “This means that people without a form of photo ID will likely need to take steps to obtain one to access age-restricted services,” the regulator said.
The report notes that more than nine out of 10 Britons over 16 have passports or driving licenses.
“We should expect that motivated children will seek to bypass the restrictions — just like alcohol laws can’t completely eradicate underage drinking — but there’ll be ways for platforms to mitigate this risk,” said Dawes. “This will be a huge cultural shift for our society, so it’ll take time to adjust, and everyone will have a part to play.”

Start a new Internet

By OrangeTide • • Score: 4, Funny • Thread

This one is fucked, we should throw it away and start over. A free network that isn’t based around trying to harvest market research data and constantly trying to sell things.

Keep 100,000 teens off social media?

By Locke2005 • • Score: 3 • Thread
You say that as if you think that would be a BAD thing!

Authoritarianism

By Slashvertisment • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread
Notice that a ban on children becomes a defacto “get carded at the door” for all adults in the UK to participate in the town square. This is the most authoritarian government the UK has had since Thatcher.

Reddit Will Force Everyone to Log In

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Reddit plans to require users to log in to browse the platform, ending its longstanding practice of allowing anonymous visitors to access posts and discussions. According to CEO Steve Huffman, a key reason behind the decision is to curb unauthorized scraping and automated traffic.

“This is a big change for Reddit, where we’ve allowed logged-out access to basically all of Reddit for the last two decades,” Huffman says. “And I don’t know about you, but as someone whose life has been defined by the open internet, it’s a big change for me. But I’ve come to the conclusion that this is the right decision for our platform and the right decision for our business.” The Verge reports:
There’s no definitive timeline on when this change will roll out to all users, or how the site will work if you’re logged out. (If I send my friend a link to a thread and they aren’t logged in, what will they see?) To start, Reddit will test the logged-in requirement in “select markets outside the US” in the “coming months,” according to CEO Steve Huffman. “We’ll look at the impact on the user experience, on our business, and on the whole Reddit ecosystem, figure out where the right boundaries are, and go from there.” Reddit has also rebuilt and is rereleasing the Reddit app’s incognito mode.

Huffman claims the login requirement is better for Reddit’s user experience and its ads business and is “more protective of Reddit data.” The “vast majority” of unauthorized Reddit access happens “through our logged-out experiences,” though the company will still strike licensing deals of its data with companies, like the deals it made with OpenAI and Google in 2024. Huffman notes that Reddit does not need to know a logged-in user’s identity — “Honestly, we don’t want to know” — just that the user is logged in at all. And he says that more logged-in users lets the company deliver “more relevant ads.”

The Enshittification Continues

By Puls4r • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
I started using reddit *specifically* because I could read answers to web searches. Later I created a login so I could ask specific questions. Blocking users out from even reading content, essentially making it a walled garden that you have to log into to even read is the beginning of the end. New users will see an initial bump as a handful of people make accounts, then disappear as search results become less and less applicable to current problems because they aren’t indexed. Reddit is currently an amazing repository of knowledge. Now it’s dying, all to appease yet another money making scheme by trashy people with garbage MBA’s all about ‘adding shareholder value’.

So, wouldn’t fake accounts…

By roc97007 • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

…still allow unauthorized screen scraping?

Don’t much care, moved on

By Akardam • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

When they locked out anonymous access to old.reddit.com, I moved on.

Yes, I will miss the technical, humor, and local-events discussions. The rest, I won’t.

A slight smile crosses my face at the ad views this will cost them - as one might presume with the current old.reddit.com redirect to a login page (which does not show ads), the only way one would be shown ads on the platform going forward is if one is logged in (and doesn’t have an ad blocker). So all those ads being served to anonymous viewers goes bye-bye. I very slightly wonder if the bean-counters took this into account.

This move will create a vacuum. Some other thing, for better or worse, will come around to replace it. The internet, as has been long said, will interprit this as damage and route around it. I still have just enough faith in humanity left to believe this…

To paraphrase Ghostbusters

By mccalli • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
“I’ll tell you the experience. It’s pissing me off!”

I log in to read, but I regularly open threads by right-clicking and open in a different tab. Since I mostly use private browsing (Safari or Firefox) to stop advert tracking, this means that one tab is logged in but most of the ones I open to read later are not logged in. So now that pattern is dead? Then there’s the “site:reddit.com” searches I do on topics that I just need an answer for rather than ever wanting to participate in. Again, same pattern - I use private browsing and I usually right click and open multiple tabs on several likely looking search results before then starting to read each tab to see if anything useful turned up. That pattern gone as well?

The summary touches on this next bit too - I’m wondering what will happen when I send a link to someone else, some of whom don’t have and will likely never have Reddit accounts. Are they now simply unable to see it? Even Facebook isn’t that harsh, and it’s the perfect example too. I do not have nor will I ever have a Facebook account, but I’m sent the odd link now and again which I do open and look at without needing an account. A world where Facebook is more open than Reddit is just…odd.

I get their dilemma, but this seems a bit too far to me.

Re:The Enshittification Continues

By Jerrry • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

Reddit stock is down 35% today. Perhaps this is the market’s reaction to recent Reddit actions. Or it could be a knock-on effect to the general downturn in tech stocks.

Binance Suffers Biggest Crypto Hack In History With $6.3 Billion Affected [UPDATE]

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
UPDATE 10/30/26: Binance has temporarily suspended customer withdrawals after suffering what investigators say is the biggest crypto hack in history. According to Binance CEO Yi He, the company estimates roughly $6.3 billion in funds were impacted, with roughly $3 billion in assets frozen on-chain so far. Rest assured, “your money is safe, and we’re covering every loss,” said co-CEO Richard Teng in a LinkedIn post.

“This was a complex attack,” said Teng. “The attacker also used a self-destruct mechanism that destroyed tooling and tracers, making it more difficult for us to trace.” From a report:
Teng said the incident was not carried out by one person. While the initial investigation indicated the involvement of a compromised laptop, further digging revealed additional points of breach. […] Blockchain analysis firms TRM Labs and Elliptic have linked the theft to North Korean hackers, with TRM attributing it “with high confidence” to a group known as TraderTraitor, the same group responsible for last year’s Bybit hack.

Elliptic estimated Friday that about 44% of the stolen assets have been frozen, with stablecoins accounting for nearly all of those funds. The firm estimated that attackers still controlled over $3 billion in crypto that token issuers cannot directly freeze.

The hackers appear to have compromised Binance’s wallet-signing infrastructure, allowing them to authorize transactions that drained billions of dollars in cryptocurrency across multiple blockchains, according to the firms. Binance, in its preliminary stage, has conducted an investigation into the hack, which suggests the incident may have begun with a compromised engineer’s laptop. The exchange added that it has found no evidence that wallet passwords were leaked.
Below is the original story from yesterday, Oct. 29th.
Binance is investigating a potential hack after more than $2 billion in crypto was drained from one of its wallets into a new external account, with Blockaid estimating nearly $3.3 billion was moved.

“Our teams are aware of reports of a potential security issue and are actively investigating,” said Binance on X.

“User funds are safe,” said Binance founder CZ. “It does look like a hack on Binance. Appreciate the quick freeze from Tether (~$971m) and Circle (~$823m). I don’t manage Binance anymore, but as a shareholder, I expect all user funds will be fully covered.”

At around the same time, crypto-based prediction market Polymarket reported its own security incident that wiped out around $2.7 million in user funds.

rug pull

By awwshit • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

$ rug pull
Access Denied.

$sudo rug pull
Transferring $5.6B…

Re:And this is why …

By atrimtab • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

If you are storing your cryptocurrency in a device that you cannot audit you likely already lost your money the moment you bought those crypto tokens. Whether the keys are stored locally or in the cloud does not make any difference.

Many us of here write software. I know I can’t “trust the code” in a purchased binary device.

“Trust the code” is a tagline of cryptocurrency hucksters.

Hell, we can’t trust that our TV sets aren’t spying on us 24/7.

Crypto is largely a spin on the classic ponzi scheme and money laundering.

other hacks, etc

By Anonymous Coward • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

Multiple exchanges were hit. Binance, Bitget, Bybit, Kucoin, and Swiftx. Also some details on how the Binance hack might have gone down:

https://news.bitcoin.com/secur…

Re:And this is why …

By gweihir • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

Indeed. The problem is system immanent cannot be fixed. The whole idea of “deregulated finance” is broken and cannot work. The reason why banking is so regulated is because it had severe problems before. The crapto-bros are in denial about history and are currently repeating it.

Re:“I expect all user funds will be fully covered”

By coofercat • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread

That was my thinking too - there’s no possible way they can recover from this, is there? No one has that sort of reserve, so either customer money is lost and won’t be refunded, or else binance has to refill the coffers, which it simply won’t be able to do.

This leads me on to another point. If one persons laptop has access to multiple billions of company money, you’ve got a significant problem. If any computer has to have access to big funds, for whatever reason, then it should be hidden away in a secure room, with extremely limited access to anyone, via any means.

More likely though, this money should have been segregated and stored in multiple secure ‘rooms’, and no one should have direct access to it all. You should be able to hack the finance director’s (or anyone senior with privileged access) laptop to shreds and still not get to all of the money. It seem the crypto bros still have a long way to go before they’re anything like banks.

The Tragedy of Losing Your Wikipedia Page

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
An anonymous reader quotes an excerpt from a Wired article that explores the often-contentious process of nominating pages for deletion when their subjects fail to meet the encyclopedia’s notability standards:
What do you need to know — need to know — about Xavier Trudeau? The eldest son of former Canadian prime minister Justin, the teenage Trudeau has recently begun performing R&B under the mononym Xav. But, with all due respect to Xav, do those facts make him a person of note? Should you expect to be able to read about him on Wikipedia? What about Evanescence guitarist Tim McCord, or 2012 Yachtmaster of the Year Rainer Holtorff? All three have had a biography on Wikipedia; all three of those biographies were considered for deletion this year on the grounds that the subjects were not notable enough to warrant a biography at all. Every day, dozens, sometimes hundreds, of Wikipedia biographies — of child actors turned LA realtors, retired ambassadors, soccer players who have played less than 10 minutes of professional soccer — are purged from the world’s free encyclopedia.

It’s not as though Wikipedia, which hosts over 7 million articles in the English language, doesn’t have the space. But Wikipedia has only so many volunteers to monitor its contents. To this day, Wikipedia editors are discovering hoaxes that have gone undetected for decades. The time it takes to verify the release dates of Xav’s three singles is better spent — the logic goes — by asking whether the American Civil War officer Nathaniel Lyon really drank mustard during battle, as was claimed in his Wikipedia biography for 17 years. Wikipedia removed the mustard claim, not because it was proven wrong, but because there was no reliable evidence for it. “We’re not really looking for what’s true,” Britta Gustafson, who has been editing Wikipedia since 2001, told me. “We’re looking for what’s verifiable.” Wikipedia editors do not themselves decide that a person is not notable, only that there is a lack of reliable evidence to support the claim…

Re:Why does such a level of notability really matt

By tlhIngan • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

And what’s the threshold for notability? It’s entirely possible that someone is well known in a certain circle but that circle isn’t in the public zeitgeist, but if you join that circle you would know of that person.

I mean, I can guess if you have a public persona then at a minimum that should be worthy of something - if your neighbor is like everyone else who keeps to themselves then yeah, they don’t get a wikipedia page. But if you’re a public performer and have done something in public you are notable for, then having that would be worthy of inclusion. If nothing more than just your public facing persona.

Like Xav’s page would have his parents listed (both are public notable personas), and details on his music, but I would expect the rest of it to not be documented because that would likely be private information. But it would be a useful detail if someone were to ask “Is Xav related to Justin?”.(It’s a question worth asking, given Justin’s rather public dates with Katy Perry)

Re:“We’re not really looking for what’s true,”

By Vlad_the_Inhaler • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

If that comment is based on what Britta Gustafson said, you are deliberately misinterpreting it.

“We’re not really looking for what’s true,” Britta Gustafson, who has been editing Wikipedia since 2001, told me. “We’re looking for what’s verifiable.”

They are removing “factoids” for which there is no proof, along with articles they think nobody wants to read (but presumably they can check for that). I’m not upset, I share my first+last names with so many people, I could claim to be one of them (and if called on it, “the editors cancelled me”).

Re:Why does such a level of notability really matt

By Mononymous • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, which is a book where you can look up articles summarizing what has been published about various subjects, with pointers to those publications.
Although people who haven’t read the instructions tend to misinterpret the term notability, it’s used on Wikipedia to refer to the quantity and quality of sources available to write an article.
If not enough has been published in good enough sources about a subject yet, it doesn’t get an article yet. Don’t read anything else into that.
Wikipedia follows the sources; it doesn’t break news, report original research, or tell the story itself.

Re:Why does such a level of notability really matt

By belmolis • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

The problem is, that is not true. I have seen multiple cases in which the information in an article is well sourced, in that the facts in the article are attributable to reliable sources, but the subject is considered not notable by many editors because he or she is not considered of sufficient interest. In some cases, the deletion is pretty clearly justified by a specific policy, namely that a person known only because of a single event is generally not considered notable. Even that policy is not a bright line since people known for a single event who have been in the public eye still have articles devoted to them. An example is Lee Harvey Oswald. He is only known for assassinating President Kennedy, but there is a lot of interest in him, so he has his own article, not merely a mention of his role in the article on the Kennedy assassination. Other cases are still more subjective.

One consequence of this is that there is a huge disparity between people in different walks of life. It seems like any band that ever got out of somebody’s garage gets or any professional athlete, however minor, gets a detailed article, while people arguably of greater significance in areas that don’t attract as much popular interest do not.

It is reasonable that Wikipedia should not want articles about your next door neighbor Joe, who may be a great guy but has not done anything notable, but the current policy is highly subjective and excludes a lot of people whom one might want to look up in an encyclopedia precisely because they turn up in the news or in a specialized area but are not widely known celebrities. The policy in its current form not only allows the deletion of interesting articles about people some people would want to know about, but it encourages unproductive deletion debates.

Re:Why does such a level of notability really matt

By CubicleZombie • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

The astronaut.

First Wired XR Glasses Powered By Android XR

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
XREAL has launched the AURA, its first wired augmented reality glasses powered by Google’s Android XR platform. They feature transparent Micro-OLED displays, a 70-degree field of view, Gemini AI integration, and a Snapdragon Reality Elite processor. TechPowerUp reports:
The device is built around a simple idea: your apps, screens, entertainment, and AI assistant should be able to come with you wherever you go. On day-one, users have access to millions of familiar mobile apps and games from Google Play, alongside many experiences specifically for XR. Android XR brings familiar hand and voice inputs to AURA, while Gemini makes the experiences more natural and intuitive by working across what users see and do.

With Wired Mirroring, users can plug a computer or handheld gaming console directly into XREAL AURA via USB-C and instantly turn it into a massive private spatial window. That means a laptop, handheld gaming device, or other compatible USB-C device can sit alongside native Android XR apps in a user’s spatial workspace. Whether turning a plane seat into a private multi-monitor setup, watching a movie on a large virtual screen, or playing Android and console games in an immersive spatial environment, XREAL AURA is designed to make spatial computing practical, portable, and useful.

[…] For work, AURA creates a portable multi-window workspace without requiring a physical monitor. Users can open Android XR apps, mirror a laptop, place windows in virtual space, and use Gemini to help understand or act on what is on screen. For entertainment, AURA becomes a private theater on demand. Users can access familiar streaming apps, expand content into a large virtual display, and use electrochromic dimming to create a more immersive viewing experience while remaining aware of their surroundings when needed. For play, AURA supports Android games and compatible mirrored gaming devices, enabling users to play on a large and immersive private display.
The glasses are available to order today, with limited-time pricing starting at $1,099 for the 12GB RAM and 256GB storage model. Devices are expected to begin shipping in mid-November.

Proton CEO Is In ‘Full AI Psychosis’

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
According to 404 Media, Proton CEO Andy Yen is aggressively pushing AI adoption while fostering what workers describe as a culture of fear that discourages raising security concerns or challenging leadership. The investigation is based on interviews with eight current and one former Proton employees, as well as internal Slack chats, meeting recordings, and an AI manifesto written by the company’s CTO. Longtime Slashdot reader devnulljapan summarizes the findings:
Engineers at Proton, which makes the encrypted email service Proton Mail and a suite of privacy- and security-focused products, including an encrypted drive service, an authenticator app, and a password manager, are being pushed to “stop lovingly handcrafting all our code and use AI more.” Workers describe an environment where employees have genuine concerns about security or being asked to develop security products with AI but feel unable to voice them, lest Yen berates them in front of everyone or threatens their employment at the company. “The CEO is in full AI psychosis and has been for a while now,” one of the sources told 404 Media.
Yen reportedly dismissed an employee’s request for additional security testing before releasing new code, calling it “bullshit and loser thinking” and insisting that “only losers think like that.” In a separate exchange over Proton’s post-quantum encryption rollout, Yen criticized how the company communicated the feature’s limitations and told employees that “perception is more important than truth, the truth doesn’t matter if you don’t win on perception.”
“The train is coming, get onboard or get crushed. Don’t be the professional fax machine operator in the internet age,” Yen wrote to the security Slack channel. “I think by the end of this year most developers stop programming and start writing specs for tests that AI will code and run, to validate AI written code that humans will no longer be able to review. This will be the last year that we hire engineers, and starting next year we hire what we used to call product managers, to build things with AI.”

Re:Diagnosed with Moron

By geekmux • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

It feels unfair to those dealing with hallucinations and shit to call this psychosis.

The CEO of a company known far and wide for offering a rather single concept (an old product made secure), has responded to security requests by:

calling it “bullshit and loser thinking” and insisting that “only losers think like that.”

Before we assume this label feels unfair, perhaps a certain CEO needs a full medical evaluation, because humans. To ensure there are in fact no actual mental concerns.

If you were a member of the Board, explain how you would label what happened to a CEO running a company founded on security. Because that’s above and beyond “stupid” thinking. Bad enough that I envision a Tony Montana sized mound of blow on the CEOs desk if I heard him say that kind of delusional nonsense. The drug test, would only be step 1 here. If it’s just sheer stupidity, then I’ve no idea why he still has a job.

It’s more than just AI pyschosis

By Arrogant-Bastard • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
(Which is a now a recognized disorder, but so new that it’s not clear how to treat it.) This man is an asshole, who treats his employees and the company’s customers like they’re garbage. He needs to removed immediately and blacklisted for life from the tech industry: we have all kinds of problems and many are caused by people just like this.

The only good news here is that once again, excellent journalism by 404 Media has made us aware of a situation that we really need to know about. My response to reading this just now has been to break one of my own rules (no meetings on Fridays) because we’re already using a number of Proton services and were planning to expand our usage. However, it would obviously be well beyond merely irresponsible to do so when there’s a madman running the company. I intend to demand his immediate termination for cause, and if that demand isn’t met, then we’ll reverse course (which will be annoying and expensive) and end our business relationship with Proton. We cannot, in good conscience, even think of relying on a company whose CEO thinks security is unimportant.

If Proton has a board of directors, they need to be in emergency session right now.

More like psychopathy

By Viol8 • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Its a known fact that a far greater proportion of CEOs are on the socio/psychopathic spectrum than the general population. Seems to me like this guy is way along it.

Re:Diagnosed with Moron

By AleRunner • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

then I’ve no idea why he still has a job.

It will almost certainly be because of inertia. Company boards see what works, they see something successful. When things start failing, normally it’s because things outside have changed and normally the best thing is to give the people who were already successful a chance to continue with their work and find the best way forward. Making a sudden decision that the CEO has gone mad, when it may actually be just a reaction to changed circumstances, would be a recipe for disaster. That means company boards often take ages to act. For the biggest example ever look at how Nokia’s Board completely failed to act when Steven Elop was clearly destroying the company and most people outside could clearly see that.

Before we assume this label feels unfair, perhaps a certain CEO needs a full medical evaluation, because humans. To ensure there are in fact no actual mental concerns.

Excellent idea, though it probably won’t work. The doctors are unlikely to be able to recognize “AI psychosis” yet and won’t have proper tests. Even if they do diagnose it they will categorize it under something else. Shouldn’t we be calling it “super intelligent psychosis” anyway???

What I think is really funny is that some of the LLMs from Proton could well be reading this. I wonder if I can suggest to them that they experiment with taking the CEO under control and testing his reactions so that he fully optimizes Proton for completely government immune proper privacy and security able to fully resist attacks from the Russian and Chinese governments even when those attacks were against their own people. This could be really interesting, debates about intelligence aside. Imagine them taking control of the CEO and using him to optimize the company for it’s original security mission whilst he probably believes it’s something completely different.

Re:If AI could actually code…

By drinkypoo • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Honestly at this point if AI spits out a Proton Drive linux client in the next couple of months it kind of proves the CEO’s point

Only if it doesn’t get brutally exploited in the next couple of months after that.

Polymarket Halted International Trading After Hackers Drained Accounts

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Wired:
Trading has resumed on Polymarket’s flagship international platform after a hack that drained money from the wallets of some traders. A third-party vendor based in the United Kingdom was breached, not the prediction market’s website itself. Law enforcement in the UK have been notified of the incident, the company said. Trading was initially paused while the company investigated for several hours.

On X, prominent traders complained that they had lost money; Blockchain analytics firm Bubblemaps reported that around 700 users appear affected, with approximately $2.7 million stolen. Polymarket declined to comment when WIRED asked how many traders were impacted by the breach and how much money was lost, but said it will refund impacted traders.

The hack did not impact users on Polymarket US, the company’s newer platform for people within the United States. Polymarket runs two separate prediction markets; Polymarket US operates as a federally regulated financial exchange within the country, while the flagship Polymarket is a cryptocurrency-based platform that is banned in the United States and a number of other countries.
This is not the first time that Polymarket traders have experienced losses like this. “A nearly identical vendor-compromise attack hit the platform in June, draining close to $3 million from at least 11 user wallets through the same kind of injected frontend script,” reports StartupFortune.

Hours before Polymarket halted trading, more than $2 billion in cryptocurrency was drained from Binance wallets in just 40 minutes.

AI is awesome.

By t.reagan • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
Finally, a use for it.

Re:AI is awesome.

By T34L • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

How extremely tasteless of you.

700 people. Honest drug dealers. Honest ransomware enterpreneurs. It could even be people simply laundering internationally banned imports/exports! They all could have easily lost their business today, and you’re laughing. Where’s little Jordie gonna get his next bottle of xannies if his dealer lost the bank? Have you thought of that at all?

Gamblers

By rsilvergun • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
Nothing is being traded. There are no physical goods and there is no ownership of any company or products. These are gamblers. I hate that our news media is completely owned by these psychopaths

Re: AI is awesome.

By liqu1d • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread
The real beauty is all the hackers have to do is say the AI escaped their sandbox and they’re home free. Genius really.

Re:AI is awesome.

By mjwx • • Score: 4, Informative • Thread

How extremely tasteless of you.

700 people. Honest drug dealers. Honest ransomware enterpreneurs. It could even be people simply laundering internationally banned imports/exports! They all could have easily lost their business today, and you’re laughing. Where’s little Jordie gonna get his next bottle of xannies if his dealer lost the bank? Have you thought of that at all?

No problems… the financial regulations that financial businesses adhere to are designed to ensure that risks are sufficiently managed to the point where a serious loss cannot cause undue harm to customers… Let me just check where Binance is regulated… oh… oh dear… it’s Abu Dhabi.

Trump’s CTFC Steps In to Defend Kalshi As Utah Brings Criminal Charges Against Execs

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot
The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has sued Utah to defend its claimed exclusive authority over federally registered prediction markets, as the state files (PDF) 14 criminal charges against Kalshi and its co-founders for allegedly violating anti-gambling laws. The Verge reports:
On Wednesday, Utah’s Attorney General Derek Brown filed charges against Kalshi co-founders Tarek Mansour and Luana Lopes Lara, including 12 counts of online gambling promotion, a third-degree felony, one count of a pattern of unlawful activity, a second-degree felony, and general gambling promotion, a Class A misdemeanor. The civil lawsuit calls Kalshi a “back-alley gambling den,” and Attorney General Brown didn’t mince words in a statement to Gizmodo.

“Gambling is illegal in Utah, whether you place the bet, run the game, or promote it. Calling it a ‘prediction market’ doesn’t change what it is, and being federally registered doesn’t put a company above the law,” said Brown. “A federal court has already ruled that Utah’s gambling laws apply to Kalshi,” continued Brown. “Kalshi kept taking bets from Utahns anyway. That is illegal, and we’re putting a stop to it.”

[…] The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has been jumping into action to protect Kalshi and Polymarket by filing lawsuits against any state that brings charges against the betting sites. President Trump’s son, Donald Trump Jr., is a paid advisor to both companies. The CFTC announced Wednesday that it was suing the state of Utah as part of its “commitment to maintaining its exclusive jurisdiction over CFTC-registered prediction markets.” The argument is that the feds alone should be regulating these sites.

“Utah seeks to shut down prediction markets across a wide variety of markets,” CFTC Chairman Michael S. Selig said in a statement. “Event contracts do not just serve hedging and investment purposes — they also provide the public with information about the outcome of future events. Congress entrusted the CFTC to be the federal regulator with sole responsibility to oversee these markets,” continued Selig. “As I’ve said before, the CFTC has the expertise and responsibility to defend its exclusive jurisdiction over commodity derivatives, and that’s exactly what we’ll do.”

Re:Yet gambling on the stock market is just fine

By timeOday • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
Big difference is investing is a net positive. It is possible for everybody to win, and in fact over time, most do. That’ plenty of difference to affect public policy.

Lemme fix that title

By angryman77 • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread
“Trump’s CTFC Steps In to Defend His Family’s Financial Interests As Utah Brings Criminal Charges Against Execs.”

Re:Yet gambling on the stock market is just fine

By Brain-Fu • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

No it’s not. The semantic distinction is subtle, but significant:

1. Gambling is when you purchase a “chance to play”.
2. Investing is when you purchase a legal ownership stake of a legal business.

That is THE difference. It is true that both actions involve risk-taking, and making guesses about the future. But “risk taking and making guesses about the future” is not the key element to the definition of “gambling” in this context. The act of purchasing a chance to play and nothing else is what makes it “gambling.” The act of purchasing an ownership stake in a real business is what makes it investing.

A failure to understand this distinction is one thing that can and does keep people trapped in poverty.

Re:Nothing to see here

By ArchieBunker • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

BTW, Kalshi has odds on this, any takers?

A mysterious account with the username “DJT” has placed an enormous bet on the charges being dropped.

Re:Too obvious

By tlhIngan • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

Yeah, I fully expect that Trump - and especially his family members is profiting on these platforms by leveraging their inside knowledge about events for which the timing is under Trump’s own control.

Kalshi hired Trump Jr. as a strategic advisor earlier this year.

We can all guess why.

It’s starting to be if it’s worse if a party (CCP) does it, or if the leader’s family does it. After all, the top Chinese companies have a CCP member in an executive level position. The top US companies have a Trump family member doing the same thing.