Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Senators Demand Crackdown On Wildfire ‘Prediction Markets’
  2. NVMe Polishes Its Specs, Brings Virtualization to Locally Attached SSDs
  3. Watch a SpaceX Rocket Crash Into the Moon
  4. Texas Halts Data Center Connections To Power Grid Amid Overwhelming Demand
  5. EA Is Now Officially Privately Owned
  6. Apple Limits Bug Bounty Submissions After Flood of AI Slop
  7. Bending Spoons to Buy Airtable For $1.28 Billion
  8. Microsoft Tells Engineers ‘Tokenmaxxing Is Not What We Are Optimizing For’
  9. Trump Begins Selling $100,000 Monthly Subscription Service to Wall Street
  10. Trump Administration Drafting Ban On Chinese Data Center Devices
  11. Apple Says More Ex-Employees May Have Taken Confidential Data to OpenAI
  12. Apple Launches Legal Challenge Against UK Demand To Access Encrypted User Data
  13. Sandisk and SK Hynix Publish First Open High Bandwidth Flash Standard
  14. Russia-Linked ‘Midnight Blizzard’ Group Hijacks Hotel Wi-Fi With CaptiveCrunch
  15. Spain Offers $1.14 Billion To Get Thirty Meter Telescope Moved To Canary Islands

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Senators Demand Crackdown On Wildfire ‘Prediction Markets’

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica:
Several US senators have written a letter to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), inquiring about the agency’s “plans to crack down on prediction markets” that offer “contracts for individuals to bet on wildfires.” “Offering bets on destructive wildfires threatens to minimize communities’ suffering, all so the rich and powerful can profit,” wrote (PDF) the group of senators, who represent Oregon, California, Nevada, Minnesota, and New Hampshire. The document specifically cites that Polymarket hosted bets in January 2025 on the wildfires in Los Angeles, and it mentions another website which specifically accepts “simulated bets” exclusively on California wildfires.

“There’s also the heightened risk — according to state and local fire officials — that individuals could be tempted to commit arson in order to make sure their bets are successful,” the letter continues. “By offering contracts on fires, prediction market sites run the risk of encouraging people to influence fires that have already started, creating additional concerns around public safety and insider trading.” […] Kalshi spokesperson Elisabeth Diana told Ars by email that the company does not allow such wildfire markets “because they create perverse incentives.” But its primary rival, Polymarket, has taken a different approach. A spokesperson for Polymarket told Ars in an emailed statement that the company does not “profit from outcomes,” adding that people “come to Polymarket for information.” “While we are not blind to the risks, removing these markets does not prevent a tragedy but makes the most accurate information less accessible to the people who need it most,” he wrote.

California

By reanjr • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

California should just make putting a bet on wildfires a crime equal to starting a wildfire.

NVMe Polishes Its Specs, Brings Virtualization to Locally Attached SSDs

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
The latest NVMe specifications add SSD-level virtualization that can simplify live VM migration by preserving storage identities across servers. The updates also introduce support for post-quantum cryptography, controller-based rate limiting, voltage monitoring, and factory-reset capabilities. The Register reports:
Announced by the NVM Express consortium, all 11 of the suite of NVMe specs have been updated with new features and engineering change notices. These represent the next step in the evolution of the standard, it says, which was created as a protocol to support storage devices connected to a system’s PCIe bus. Perhaps the most significant new capability is PCIe Exported NVM Subsystem Migration. This extends existing NVMe virtualization to locally-attached PCIe SSDs. It does this by abstracting the physical drives into host-defined virtualized NVM subsystems, to allow for virtual machine (VM) mobility without storage reconfiguration.

When a VM moves from one server to another, its storage also needs to move with it in a way that’s non-disruptive to any applications running in that VM. “With NVM Subsystem Migration, NVMe SSDs can present exported NVM subsystems that hide the complexity of the underlying hardware,” says Mike Allison, a senior director at SSD maker Samsung and NVM Express board member. “Instead of interacting with physical controllers and namespaces, the host only sees exported controllers and namespaces. This creates a clean separation between what the VM sees and what’s happening under the hood,” Allison explains on an NVM Express blog.

“One of the key innovations here is providing the host with control over exported identifiers. During migration, those identifiers can be carried over exactly from the source to the destination. That consistency is crucial: even if the underlying hardware uses different internal IDs, the VM sees no change and can pick up right where it left off with no storage reconfiguration required,” he says. In effect, the NVMe layer now enables the virtual machine manager (VMM) to rely on virtualization built into the SSD. The flash drive itself exposes logical, virtualized storage constructs, offloading this complexity from the VMM.
You can learn more about the updated NVMe specifications here.

This is neat!

By Charlotte • Score: 3 Thread

I want this feature like now. But to be really effective you need to be able to migrate between hosts as well. So the host needs to be able to set the device IDs, not the NVMe device.

I’m assuming that they’ve thought of that, though. Seems like they also introduced QoS. And what about using this for RAID? NVMe over TCP seems to be in there as well.

Can’t wait for SSD licensing

By Anonymous Coward • Score: 3, Insightful Thread

SSD as a service! Can’t fucking wait until I have to pay software licensing for my hardware.

Re: Can’t wait for SSD licensing

By dknj • Score: 4, Funny Thread

Get off my lawn bro

Watch a SpaceX Rocket Crash Into the Moon

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
A four-ton SpaceX Falcon 9 upper stage left drifting after a 2025 lunar mission is expected to crash into the Moon at about 5,400 mph, likely striking Einstein Crater. The impact should occur at approximately 2:35 a.m. ET (0635GMT). Reuters reports:
Such stages typically fall back into Earth’s atmosphere and burn up or plunge into the ocean after boosting the rocket’s payload to a precise spot in orbit. But because the January lunar lander mission required more thrust than missions closer to Earth, the rocket’s second stage remained in space, floating aimlessly among thousands of other pieces of space junk that active satellites must steer clear of. It was not until earlier this year that astronomers determined that the rocket stage, which had dumped its remaining fuel and cannot be controlled, was on an orbital trajectory ending at the moon.

“What has happened is essentially a mixture of solar activity and gravity forces have put it on a path toward the moon,” Julianna Scheiman, SpaceX director of NASA science and Dragon programs, told reporters on Monday. “This may be of some — probably minor — scientific interest, and we may learn some things from it,” said Bill Gray, creator of widely used astronomy software who published a report on the stage’s impact in April. “It doesn’t present any danger to anyone, though it does highlight a certain carelessness about how leftover space hardware (space junk) is disposed of.”
You can try to watch the impact via a livestream on YouTube; however, the area it’s expected to hit (Einstein Crater) is on the moon’s western limb, “which is often difficult to see from Earth,” notes Reuters. It will also likely “kick up a plume of lunar dust that will likely be illuminated by sunlight but difficult to spot with the naked eye from Earth.”

First impact was in 1959

By drnb • Score: 5, Informative Thread
FWIW, the First impact was in 1959.

“Luna 1 (January 1959) missed its intended impact with the Moon and became the first spacecraft to escape the Earth-Moon system. Luna 2 (September 1959) mission successfully hit the Moon’s surface, becoming the first man-made object to reach the Moon.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…

I misread headline & jumped for joy

By Tablizer • Score: 5, Funny Thread

“Watch SpaceX Crash Into the Moon”

Re: I misread headline & jumped for joy

By wgoodman • Score: 4, Funny Thread

Their stock crashed. To the moon is an entirely different story.

So much for SpaceX Autopilot Mode …

By fahrbot-bot • Score: 5, Funny Thread

SpaceX Rocket Crash Into the Moon

Incident Report: “Mr. Musk remarked: That Moon came out of nowhere.”

It happened

By greytree • Score: 4, Informative Thread
It happened, not visible from Earth, stories at links not updated yet, FFS.

https://www.independent.co.uk/space/spacex-rocket-moon-crash-falcon-9-b3027645.html

Texas Halts Data Center Connections To Power Grid Amid Overwhelming Demand

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica:
Nowhere is the US data center boom bigger than in Texas. But less than a year after declaring Texas the “epicenter of AI development,” Governor Greg Abbott has declared a moratorium on all new power grid connections for data centers — at least until developers provide more information about their projects’ potential impacts on the grid and communities. The Republican governor directed regulators in an August 3 announcement at the Public Utility Commission of Texas and the grid operators at the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) to perform a “comprehensive verification and audit of all data centers advancing through ERCOT’s interconnection process.” As an independent system operator, ERCOT oversees a power grid that operates separately from the rest of the United States and provides services to most of Texas.

Texas has aggressively courted data center development with its availability of cheap land and relatively abundant energy resources, along with offering state incentives, like tax breaks and fewer regulations. That puts the state on track to surpass Virginia in becoming the largest US data center market. But the recent AI boom and the accompanying frenzy of data center development threaten to overwhelm the Texas grid on paper, despite the state leading the country in adding new power generation. The ERCOT interconnection queue currently includes more than 1,800 projects representing over 474 gigawatts’ worth of requests to connect to the Texas grid — more than five times Texas’ record peak electricity demand — and about 90 percent of those power connection requests come from data centers.

“That unprecedented load growth could endanger the reliability and stability of the Texas electric grid,” according to the statement from Abbott’s office. Many of those data center projects may never materialize for various reasons. But ERCOT has still forecast that data center demand and other factors could drive statewide electricity demand to double the current demand record by 2032, according to The Texas Tribune.
The review will examine each project’s projected electricity consumption, reliance on the grid and state incentives, ownership, and water use. It will also assess measures intended to “reduce impacts on neighboring property owners and communities,” including noise controls, lighting, traffic improvements, setbacks, and emergency planning.
Ars Technica notes that the directive does not address air pollution or greenhouse-gas emissions and does not apply to data centers generating their own power on-site.

Re:What?!?!?

By anoncoward69 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Nope, They’re just going to encourage them to run dozens of poorly maintained rental black soot belching diesel generators on trailers in the data center parking lots contributing to the noise pollution and smog in texas. Better hope you don’t live within a few miles of one of these things.

Re:What?!?!?

By Required Snark • Score: 5, Funny Thread
There’s so much excess bullshit in Texas they could dry it and burn it to power data centers.

It’s part of the bullshit-in/bullshit-out AI bubble.

Re: Oh and in case you didn’t know that’s

By thegarbz • Score: 4, Informative Thread

The Dems were in power and running the elections when Trump won - both times. So your complaints about voter suppression simply don’t hold water.

No the Democrats were in power in precisely one state more than Republicans were. Complaints about voter suppression don’t need to “hold water”, they are widely documented and have been the subject of many high profile court cases.

The thing that is new in this election, is federal government interference in state matters (which currently is ALSO the subject of court cases).

Re:Wind and sunshine

By gtall • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

“Someone should explain supply and demand to Governor Abbott.” In his mind, energy = burning hydrocarbons. If Texas had lots of coal, they’d happily burn that. They do not give a flying rat’s ass about the planet. And there’s sizeable contingent of Christian Nutjobs down there that figure if we screw up the Earth badly enough, then Jesus will return. It’s all in the Bible, along with all their science.

Re:Wind and sunshine

By thegarbz • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Yeah but what happens then? ICE will simply deport poor Jesus, if he doesn’t die in their detention centre first.

EA Is Now Officially Privately Owned

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Longtime Slashdot reader neoRUR shares a report from Game Developer:
EA Sports FC and Battlefield publisher EA has been taken private by an investor consortium led by Saudi Arabia’s sovereign Public Investment Fund (PIF). The move means the U.S. juggernaut is no longer a publicly-traded entity and is now majority owned by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia through its PIF investment arm. Other investors include Silver Lake and Affinity Partners, the latter of which was established by U.S. president Donald Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner.

The $55 billion transaction was financed via a combination of cash from PIF, Silver Lake, and Affinity Partners as well as roll-over of PIF’s existing stake in EA — constituting an equity investment of approximately $36 billion. Notably, $20 billion of debt financing was provided by JPMorgan Chase Bank. The deal cleared the necessary regulatory hurdles in July, paving the way for its completion at the close of trading on August 4, 2026. It was approved by regulators in major markets such as the European Union and the United States without incident, despite lawmakers and union leaders in the U.S. calling on the Federal Trade Commission to heavily scrutinize the leveraged buyout over geopolitical and employment concerns.

Great

By Bahbus • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Another, and even better, reason to never touch anything produced or published by EA ever again. Fuck the Saudis.

“EA Ruins Things”…

By Moryath • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Now complete with garbage misogyny, antisemitic genocidal nutbaggery, and the rest of the horrible baggage of the Saudi Terrorist Crime Family.

EA is a Dead Man walking

By rsilvergun • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
They don’t 20 billion dollars of leveraged buyout debt on them. If you think EA sucks now you haven’t seen anything yet. They have to get out from under that debt and the only way they can think of to do that is to abuse their employees and their customers. They are already abusing the employees pretty much as much as a legally can.

I expect they will start outsourcing things to foreign countries with cheap labor that they frankly can’t really do because it’s going to create weird cultural problems to do so. On top of that they have already started trying to add even nastier microtransactions in. And this is EA we are talking about.

I feel bad for anyone who’s into their sports games because they’re going to basically collapse but because of monopolies you’re still going to be stuck with them. So if that was your hobby then it’s basically going to go to shit and there’s nothing you can do about it.

Once again this is one of those cases where antitrust law enforcement would have protected your hobby. People sometimes complain because I’m bringing politics into a hobbyist discussion but whether you like it or not politics is going to intrude on your life you don’t get to stick your head in the sand anymore…

Re:Great

By Mal-2 • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Yeah, I was thinking “We can stick it to KSA and Jared Kushner at the same time, just by not buying EA games? Where do I sign up?”

Re:Great

By karmawarrior • Score: 4, Funny Thread

Does this mean I can’t use Deluxe Paint III on my Amiga any more? *sighs* OK then!

Apple Limits Bug Bounty Submissions After Flood of AI Slop

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Apple has capped the number of open bug-bounty reports researchers can submit after being flooded with low-quality and sometimes entirely fabricated vulnerabilities generated by AI. MacRumors reports:
The Financial Times learned of the limit after cybersecurity startup Bynario used ChatGPT to locate more than 50 macOS bugs in three weeks. Bynario found a privilege escalation exploit that could let an attacker get unrestricted access to a Mac, but was unable to report it because Apple limited the number of bug reports Bynario could submit. Bynario sent eight reports to Apple in 2025, and another five in 2026 before hitting a restriction.

Bynario’s founder said it is a “very difficult time in the industry” because companies are being “flooded by the sheer amount of bugs.” Apple has since been in contact with Bynario and is reviewing the company’s submissions. While Apple now has a cap on the number of open submissions a researcher can have, researchers can request an increase to make sure Apple’s security team doesn’t miss a critical vulnerability.

Auto increase

By MidSpeck • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Apple should automatically increase the number of open submissions for a given researcher if they have previously accepted ones from them.

smart move

By bloodhawk • Score: 3, Funny Thread
Apple Engineer : we are getting too many bugs reported from people due to their use of AI.
Apple Exec : Easy fix let’s only let them submit 5 a month.
Apple Engineer : errrr yeah sure that will fix it. rolling eyes sarcasticly.

6 months later
Apple Exec : Why the FUCK are all these bugs being released on the internet for our OS
Apple Engineer : Because you told us to not let people submit them to us....

Bynario’s Flaw

By Petersko • Score: 3 Thread

Their system is built on symbiotic relationships, but their current behavior is swinging to parasitic. They are overwhelming their host.

They should expect to get throttled - indeed they should strategically throttle themselves. Keep to high value bugs and pace them. Expecting that the bounty well should be infinitely drawn from at max rate without consequence isn’t reasonable.

Ask for ID

By reanjr • Score: 3 Thread

Just start verifying who is contributing code. This is how the Debian project has worked for decades. It’s doable.

Once you have an actual identity attached to code submissions, you can implement ratings systems so people like this guy who are legit using LLMs to find real bugs can have his reports sail on through, while some automated LLM will never be able to submit a change.

Bending Spoons to Buy Airtable For $1.28 Billion

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Bending Spoons has made its first acquisition since going public last month at an $18 billion valuation, agreeing to buy spreadsheet and database startup Airtable for $1.28 billion in cash. Airtable joins a growing portfolio of notable brands owned by the Italian app developer, including Evernote, WeTransfer, EventBrite, and Vimeo. TechCrunch reports:
Founded in 2013, Airtable has so far raised more than $1.4 billion over multiple funding rounds. At its peak, during the boom days of 2021, it was valued at over $11 billion, but earlier this year, its shares were said to be trading on the secondary markets at a valuation of $4 billion. With its current net cash-and-cash-equivalents balance, Airtable is now valued at about $2.25 billion, Bending Spoons said.

“Airtable is a pioneering brand reshaping how teams organize data and manage critical workflows. The value being delivered is reflected in annual recurring revenue growing over 20% YoY to approximately $480 million as of June 2026, and joining forces with Bending Spoons will accelerate innovation even further,” Bending Spoons’ founder Luca Ferrari said in a statement.

Who?

By dbialac • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Who^2?

Re:Who?

By Ostracus • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Airtable Review (2026): The Best Spreadsheet-Database Hybrid for Teams?

What Is Airtable?
Airtable is a cloud-based platform that combines the simplicity of a spreadsheet with the power of a relational database. Founded in 2012 by Howie Liu, Andrew Ofstad, and Emmett Nicholas, Airtable has raised over $1.4 billion in funding and is valued at $11 billion. Over 450,000 organizations use Airtable, including companies like Netflix, Shopify, and the Red Cross.

The core concept: each Airtable “base” is a relational database with multiple linked tables, but the interface looks and feels like a spreadsheet. You get familiar row-and-column editing, plus database features like linked records, rollups, lookups, and field types (attachments, checkboxes, single/multi-select, dates, currency). Multiple views — grid, kanban, calendar, gallery, gantt, form — let different team members see the same data in the format most useful to them.

Airtable’s target audience is operations teams, marketing teams, product managers, and anyone who has outgrown spreadsheets but doesn’t need (or want to build) a full database application.

Bending Spoons sucks

By quonset • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

My dad lost access to his email account (AOL) for over two months. Every time we called all we were told was everything looked good with his account, but if we pay them, Bending Spoons, they can get us help.

Submitting a support issue through their web site got AI responses. The last email I have from them was from “Greg” telling me he’d reviewed everything and repeated the exact same thing we were told when we called. The problem was, “Greg” had previously asked me for a screenshot of what my dad was seeing, which was a blank, white screen when he was challenged to prove he was who said he was, something he never had to do in the decade he was with AOL.*

Had “Greg” truly reviewed the account, “he” would have seen his comment to approve the request was impossible because there was nothing to approve.

Bending Spoons is just an aggregator of crap companies. Anyone who put money into their stock is getting scammed.

* My dad’s email was moved from his ISP to AOL which is why he has an AOL account. I recently got him another account somewhere else where all his important stuff, such as medical and financial information, won’t be held hostage by an incompetent company.

Enshitification as a company motto.

By nightflameauto • Score: 3 Thread

Bending Spoons sees decent companies that provide something end-users actually like, buys the company, then turns that thing users like into something with the vague sheen of what they used to like, but more monetized, somewhat crippled, with favorite features clusterfucked with happy-happy messaging about improvements that aren’t. The fact that companies like this don’t just exists, but thrive in our world, is a sign we went horribly wrong somewhere along the line. We reward these parasitic profit generators with ever escalating value and profit, while allowing the better parts of the business world to be sucked up into them like black holes, slowly spaghettifying them, stretching the positive that made them interested in whatever they consumed to slowly turn into nothing but a thin string of empty promise, that if you squint almost looks like the memory of that good thing they initially purchased.

It’s super stupid, but it seems to be the way of everything now.

Microsoft Tells Engineers ‘Tokenmaxxing Is Not What We Are Optimizing For’

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Microsoft is introducing AI token budgets for employees, making the cheaper GPT-5.6 its default internal model and telling engineers to focus on business results rather than maximizing AI usage. 404 Media reports:
“As we accelerate our use of GitHub Copilot to deliver on our goals, we all need to be aware of how we consume tokens,” Jay Parikh, an executive vice president at Microsoft said in an email to Microsoft employees. GitHub is owned by Microsoft, and GitHub Copilot is an AI coding tool. “Tokenmaxxing is not what we are optimizing for. I want all of us focused on maximizing outcomes that move the needle for our customers and our business.” “As such, we are updating our internal guidance and managing token spend with the same discipline we apply to every other critical resource,” Parikh said in the email.

Parikh’s email says that in an effort to “get greater value from our token investment” Microsoft is making OpenAI GPT-5.6, which is cheaper to use than other models, the default model for internal use. His email also links to updated internal Copilot guidelines stating that, as of July 2026, Microsoft divisions will have an “AI token budget target,” and that employees can track their individual AI spending. “While there is no target spend value being shared at this time. The data shows that many engineers spend in the range of hundreds of dollars a month to a few thousand dollars in tokens,” the guidelines say. They also say that some decisions may place further restrictions as they monitor spend.

[…] Parikh’s email said Microsoft will keep learning and adjusting its AI policies as models and products evolve, and stressed that he doesn’t want to slow down the company’s progress towards becoming “AI-first.” “We are not optimizing for fewer tokens,” he said. “We are optimizing for more impact per token.

The metrics you chose create the behavior you see

By Locke2005 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
If you’re measuring token use, you’re encouraging token use to game the stats.

Re:The metrics you chose create the behavior you s

By gweihir • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Stupid metrics produce stupid results. And stupid people love stupid metrics. What else is new.

Damn dyslexia

By fahrbot-bot • Score: 4, Funny Thread

Tokenmaxxing Is Not What We Are Optimizing For

I was half way through re-reading The Two Tower - (*sigh*)

Re:WTAF??

By karmawarrior • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Because a lot of corps are saying the opposite right now, saying you’ll be judge on your use of AI, and punished for your lack of use of it.

Which is why you get insane shit like people punching bullet points into ChatGPT telling it to expand it into a full email, and the recipient receiving it and putting that into ChatGPT to summarize it as a set of bullet points.

I’d say I’m glad the companies who have been doing this are the ones who’ll eventually go tits up when the bill comes in (which is more than the cost of tokens, it’s the lack of control over their own businesses), but the reality is that management isn’t the group that’ll suffer. The people fired for non-compliance with this stupidity are merely the first in a long line of people who’ll get hurt despite never doing anything more than what their managers said they had to do.

This timeline absolutely sucks.

Re:This is pretty much the beginning of the crash

By karmawarrior • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

> But that narrative was the only thing that could have made the large LLMs profitable and it was what brought the employee-hating CEOs on board.

Doesn’t have to be sustainable, just needs to keep businesses using them for long enough that critical business knowledge is lost among employees who become reliant upon the LLM providers for everything.

The question was never “Is this unsustainable if taken at face value”, because the plot was never to sell useful services, it was to take over most US businesses by making them unable to run themselves. The question now is whether they managed to keep it going for long enough that this will happen, or whether the crash will happen before that to happen.

People often describe BigAI as a con. But BigAI is better described as a heist.

Trump Begins Selling $100,000 Monthly Subscription Service to Wall Street

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Trump Media has officially launched its $100,000-per-month data feed giving trading firms machine-readable access to Truth Social posts milliseconds before the public. According to Fortune, five Wall Street firms have already signed up for the service, which “would generate about $500,000 in monthly revenue, or $6 million annually.”

Critics argue the service could let President Trump, who owns about 41% of the company, profit from early access to market-moving presidential communications. “I’ll be blunt,” Gian Luca Clementi, an economics professor at NYU Stern School of Business, told Fortune. “This is insider trading by definition.”

“He’s going to monetize the role of the office of the president of the United States,” he said. “The undisputable fact is that somebody is going to earn some more money than before, and that’s the president of the United States.” From the report:
Trump’s media venture has struggled to build a profitable social media business despite its lofty valuation. Truth Social has reported significant operating losses since going public. According to the company’s earnings report for Q1 2026, Trump Media & Technology Group netted a roughly $405 million loss and raised less than $900,000 in sales.

Not everyone agrees the arrangement meets the legal bar for insider trading. Shannon Devine, a spokeswoman for Trump Media & Technology Group, has pushed back on the characterization, telling Quartz that Truth API “offers customers the fastest way to ingest publicly available Truth Social data” and that critics “must have invented a new theory of ‘insider trading’ based on publicly available information.”

Classic insider trading law hinges on trading on secret, material information in breach of a fiduciary duty, and Truth Social posts are, by design, meant to become public within moments — raising real doctrinal uncertainty about whether faster access alone qualifies. But other legal experts argue the greater risk lies ahead. Richard Painter, former White House chief ethics counsel, has argued that the arrangement could violate federal law once Trump posts genuinely market-moving news — on tariffs, military action, or other policy decisions — before it’s public, with Truth Social effectively acting as a paid “tipper” on the president’s behalf.
Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) said he plans to introduced legislation Tuesday to ban the president from selling expedited access to his statements.

Re:Just imagine

By swillden • Score: 5, Informative Thread

They all do this

NONE of them have done this, not in 250 years. Not until Trump. Presidents make a lot of money after they leave office, yes, especially in recent decades. They command incredible speaking fees (Obama famously got $400k for one speech), they write books that make millions, etc. There are lots of people who are willing to give them money to get close to them, get their advice, etc.

But until Trump, none of them has used the office of the president to make money. No one else has sold pardons. No one else has set up a public stock and a memecoin to facilitate billions of dollars in bribes. No one else has brazenly sold insider secrets to stock traders.

Trump’s corruption isn’t just new in scale, it’s a completely new thing that the United States of America has never before seen. We’ve seen plenty of corruption elsewhere in government, at all levels, but never in the oval office.

Re: Ok, so since market has started ignoring him

By WaffleMonster • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Meanwhile the Democrat lemmings here ignore people like Nancy Pelosi. Multiple people in both houses having been doing this crap for decades and you so called educated folks ignore that very obvious fact.

But but but Trump.

This is exactly why I rarely post here anymore. Your TDS has blinded you. Just like how you ignore that the DSA is taking over the DNC while you aren’t paying attention.

Do you believe it is possible to ever focus on a given topic without being required to evaluate every other instance of any other situation that could be remotely construed to be similar having ever occurred in human history?

If you were in court defending a client from a murder charge would you chastise the court for their failure to enumerate all the other murders who murder too? Would you drone on about how it is unfair to single out your client while asserting the court is suffering from MDS (Murderer Derangement Syndrome)?

Re: Ok, so since market has started ignoring him

By EmagGeek • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Well, to make a not so subtle point, there WAS an armed revolt, but it was in defense of all this, not in opposition.

Doesn’t help that the media would sane wash it

By rsilvergun • Score: 5, Informative Thread
Trump said and did absolutely batshit in the same things all throughout the 2024 campaign and he also if you were paying any attention to politics made it crystal clear that his brain is mush and that he is actively senile. We pretty much have confirmation that he is on Alzheimer’s medication. That’s why he keeps having to go to Walter Reed and why he has those bruises on his hands that’s how they deliver the medications they’re using to try and keep his brain just functional enough that he can get through a speech.

The news media is 90% billionaire owned and they cover it all of that up. Meanwhile every time Joe Biden stuttered we got eight weeks of non-stop coverage. It was so common that it’s created a new term in politics called sane washing which is the idea of taking a batshit crazy politician and covering up how insane they are.

If you’re a low information voter who doesn’t pay attention to politics then what you came away from in the last election is that Kamala Harris was going to help you get an abortion and Donald Trump was going to lower the price of eggs. Yeah that’s absolutely fucking insane but that’s what happens when so many people are so low information and our news media no longer even tries to inform them. Anyone who did last cycle got fired.

I watched as a couple dozen well respected journalists got fired from their jobs for reporting things Trump said and did.

Speaking for the rest of the world

By Kernel Kurtz • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
America pretty much qualifies as a banana republic now.

Trump Administration Drafting Ban On Chinese Data Center Devices

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Longtime Slashdot reader schwit1 shares a report from Reuters:
The Federal Communications Commission, which oversees the U.S. telecom industry, is working on the measure to bar imports of new Chinese optical transceivers, which allow data to travel over fiber-optic cables at the speed of light within data centers. Officials hope to publish it this year, when it would take effect. The move, not previously reported, aims to prevent Chinese firms from stealing data, installing malware or disrupting service at U.S. data centers, which house the chips to train and run AI models.

The FCC could still modify or shelve the restriction, the sources stressed, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive matters. […] A U.S. ban on new models of Chinese data center devices would likely hit China’s Zhongji Innolight, one of the biggest global sellers of transceivers, which was added to the Pentagon’s list of alleged Chinese military-backed companies in June. The list can be a harbinger of tougher action. A ban could also raise costs for American cloud firms such as Amazon Web Services, as it may force them to transition to other producers such as U.S.-based Coherent and Lumentum.

That is one way to stop AI DC builds

By CommunityMember • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Some of the largest buyers of Chinese manufactured transceivers are the hyperscalers. The hyperscalers represent more than half of Zhongji Innolight’s total revenue. While there may be other sources, blocking the purchase of Chinese manufactured transceivers may have a significant impact on the AI data center builds.

The power paradox

By ArchieBunker • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The FCC is powerless to regulate net neutrality yet powerful enough to ban random products over unfounded claims.

Re:That is one way to stop AI DC builds

By devnulljapan • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Some of the largest buyers of Chinese manufactured transceivers are the hyperscalers. The hyperscalers represent more than half of Zhongji Innolight’s total revenue. While there may be other sources, blocking the purchase of Chinese manufactured transceivers may have a significant impact on the AI data center builds.

So, it’s just another trump shakedown dressed up as national security then. He shakes this stick, mysteriously and completely coincidentally Anthropic and OpenAI and all the others pony up a few million in donations to his campaign or buy his crypto or gold shoes or whatever and all of a sudden the issue goes away … until the next round of bullying begins.

scare wording

By algaeman • Score: 4, Funny Thread
“is working on the measure to bar imports of new Chinese optical transceivers, which allow data to travel over fiber-optic cables at the speed of light within data centers” Oooh, scary. These are so high tech that they have been used in data centers for 30 years now. Maybe they should ban capacitors from China because these alternating plates of ceramic have the ability to cripple data centers when they fail.

Of all the ways and places…

By zeeky boogy doog • Score: 3 Thread
There’s plenty ways China may try to steal things from a datacenter. There’s a lot of ways Chinese threat actors try to steal American IP and data. I don’t think I could possibly write a list long enough for “the optical transceivers in the switches” to land on it.

The idea that a stick with half the volume of a finger is going to both do its job as assigned (and that is not an easy job - it’s really quite a miracle that they’re able to pack all those optics and electronics into those things) AND contain a processor capable of decoding, processing, and stealing information from an absolute firehose of data capable of overwhelming a powerful CPU, all without compromising the sub-15W power and cooling envelope of a QSFP transceiver (and that’s being really generous), AND on top of that then be able to *inject* data into the outbound stream (whichever one -that- is, could be either set of lanes because you have no idea if the transceiver is in host or switch) in order to exfiltrate the stolen information, … oh right and it’s also got 16G of ddr5 in there so it can buffer 2/3 of a second of the firehose, and…

You’re not stealing information from the switch either, because nothing in the switch is capable of it. The ASICs in the switches now burn several hundred watts of power. It’s mind boggling it’s so little because they’re capable of receiving and forwarding sixty billion packets a second. There’s no splitting streams, no spying, just an ASIC designed for pure, raw, insane speed, handling over a thousand DVDs a second of data running in and out of five hundred data lines. The single-board x86 computer in it that does the setup has a handful of Celeron-level cores, maybe 4G of ram and a tiny little SSD with less storage than your last phone.

APTs may use that switch computer to achieve persistent access to your network, but that’s a whole different can of worms.

Apple Says More Ex-Employees May Have Taken Confidential Data to OpenAI

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Apple is now seeking a preliminary injunction to prevent OpenAI and Jony Ive’s io startup from developing AI hardware allegedly based on stolen Apple trade secrets. “The iPhone maker also claims that more of its former employees may be involved with the trade secrets theft,” reports TechCrunch. From the report:
In a new filing, Apple is requesting expedited discovery from the accused OpenAI employees, senior systems engineer Chang Liu and Chief Hardware Officer Tang Yew Tan; OpenAI, and its foundation; and io, the device startup co-founded by Apple’s former lead designer Jony Ive. Apple also notes that its continued investigation has so far revealed 11 other former Apple employees beyond Liu and Tan may have been witnesses or otherwise involved in the case, and others who were previously named in the original complaint, like OpenAI employee Yu-Ting Peng.

The filing marks an escalation in Apple’s legal battle with OpenAI, as it suggests Apple has uncovered new evidence that the misconduct goes beyond the former employees named in the original complaint. “For example, another former Apple employee seems to have met with Mr. Liu and Ms. Peng in advance of Ms. Peng’s interview at OpenAI and discussed with them during that meeting Apple proprietary information relating to unannounced products,” the filing states. “Yet another former Apple employee took screenshots of confidential Apple documents relating to an unannounced Apple product before an interview at OpenAI.”

“And, after Apple filed its complaint, multiple former Apple employees now working at OpenAI reached out to discuss returning Apple-issued work devices they kept when they left Apple,” Apple claims, suggesting there were more who were possibly involved with the scheme. Apple is pushing the court to allow for expedited discovery because it believes it has good cause to suspect that there are others involved in the theft of its intellectual property. The company noted that its motion for a preliminary injunction is also pending.
Apple’s request for a preliminary injunction is “both based on false information and completely unnecessary because we do not have, nor want, any of their trade secrets,” said OpenAI in a blog post.

“We’re much more interested in building innovative products and technologies that push the frontier,” OpenAI’s statement reads.

Well

By drinkypoo • Score: 3 Thread

Good thing they BYOD so all that data is so easy to exfiltrate.

If I were OpenAI…

By ClickOnThis • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

…I would not want to hire thieves. They’re just as likely to steal from you as from their previous employer. Not saying OpenAI necessarily wouldn’t, just that I wouldn’t.

Let discovery take its course. If there’s any there there, we’ll find out what it is.

Apple Launches Legal Challenge Against UK Demand To Access Encrypted User Data

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Guardian:
Apple has launched a new legal challenge against a UK government demand to access its customers’ highly encrypted data, a year after the Home Office agreed to abandon its previous request. The US tech company launched the legal complaint last month at the Investigatory Powers Tribunal (IPT), an independent court that has the power to investigate claims that the UK intelligence services have acted unlawfully. The UK government had made a second request to Apple to grant it a “back door” to encrypted iCloud data belonging to British users, according to an order issued by the court.

Britain backed down on its original demand for access to data from UK and US customers last year, after a heated transatlantic tussle over encryption between London and Washington. UK authorities subsequently issued a new “technical capability notice” (TCN) to Apple that did not apply to American users. Apple is seeking to challenge the British government’s powers to issue TCNs under the UK Investigatory Powers Act, according to the details of the new legal case first reported by the Financial Times. […] The original TCN issued last year asked Apple for the right to see users’ encrypted data protected by its advanced data protection (ADP) program in the event of a national security risk.

Apple said the removal of the tool — which not even it can access — would make users more vulnerable to data breaches from bad actors and other threats to customer privacy. Creating a “back door” would also mean all data was accessible by Apple, which it could be forced to share with law enforcement possessing a warrant. As a result, Apple withdrew UK customers’ access to its ADP program in January 2025. The Home Office has maintained that the Investigatory Powers Act, under which such orders are issued, contains robust safeguards and is used only when absolutely necessary.

‘Robust Safeguards’

By mccalli • Score: 5, Informative Thread
Just for context, when its predecessor RIPA, Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act, came in it was said to be used only for cases such as terrorism etc.. Instead, it was found that councils started using to check people were putting things in the right rubbish bins for collection.

Robust safeguards indeed.

Re:‘Robust Safeguards’

By Brain-Fu • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

It doesn’t matter. Making it possible to open a back door “at all” puts all users at risk, regardless of how rarely the government intends to use it.

There should be no back door at all, just a solid wall. Otherwise, criminals will find a way to open the back door even if there is no government abuse (which there for sure will be).

So …

By PPH • Score: 3 Thread

… the UK is going to outlaw speaking Welsh?

Sandisk and SK Hynix Publish First Open High Bandwidth Flash Standard

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
BrianFagioli writes:
Sandisk and SK hynix have published the first open technical specification for High Bandwidth Flash (HBF) through the Open Compute Project. HBF is designed to create a new memory tier between High Bandwidth Memory and traditional SSD storage, giving AI inference systems more near compute capacity without relying entirely on expensive HBM. The specification supports capacities up to 512GB using 8-high and 16-high NAND stacks, with bandwidth tiers ranging from about 0.4TB per second to 3.0TB per second. It also uses the UCIe chiplet interface, which could make HBF easier to integrate with CPUs, GPUs, and other accelerators. Google and Tenstorrent participated in the standardization effort, but commercial products and independent benchmarks are still missing.

An open standard… or a moat?

By memory_register • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Sandisk and SK Hynix are fleecing everybody - pc and phone makers, NVIDIA, the Mag7 - which means we are all paying a ton more for their products. They are essentially an oligopoly along with a small handful of memory makers. Did they do this out of the kindness of their hearts, or to create a standard they control to their own benefit?

Re:An open standard… or a moat?

By williamyf • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Sandisk and SK Hynix are fleecing everybody - pc and phone makers, NVIDIA, the Mag7 - which means we are all paying a ton more for their products. They are essentially an oligopoly along with a small handful of memory makers. Did they do this out of the kindness of their hearts, or to create a standard they control to their own benefit?

Same with Dell with CAMM and nVIDIA+Micron with SOCAMM (similar name, similar idea, completely different use cases). Both of those presented the original stadard as a PoC, and then handed it over to JEDEC, so they became CAMM2 and SOCAMM2, completely neutral industry wide standards.

I suspect the same will happen here, a few demo/lab/PoC products will be produced, and then this will be handed over to JEDEC, so that it becomes an industry wide standard.

What do they (SKHynix, Sandisk and before them Dell, Micron and nVIDIA) win by doing this? IF (and only if) there are patents involved, they win FRAND revenue (just as an aside, neither CAMM2 nor SOCAMM2 have patents involved). And wether there are patents involved or not, these companies have a leg up on the competition in terms of know-how and practice making the stuff.

Re:Optane

By geek • Score: 4, Informative Thread

It’s easy to blame Intel but that was a joint venture with Micron and Intel. IMFlash out of Lehi Utah. Micron was every bit as responsible and if I remember right still holds most of the patents.

You could even make the case it was Micron that killed it because they dumped the entire thing on Intel and sold off the Lehi fab. Without Micron sharing manufacturing costs and with scaling difficulties lagging behind traditional NAND bit density improvements, Optane became financially unviable.

Re:An open standard… or a moat?

By thegarbz • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Sandisk and SK Hynix are fleecing everybody

Supply and demand curve breakdown does not mean anyone is being fleeced. It just means someone with deeper pockets than you wants the limited thing more than you do. Their products are being sold at market rates.

They are essentially an oligopoly along with a small handful of memory makers.

Which is irrelevant. Being an oligopoly is just a state to describe how many companies are in a market. It doesn’t have any impact on the market. Actions have impacts on markets, and while this oligopoly has in the past been found guilty of collusion, there’s zero evidence that what is happening right now would be any different if there were 100 small manufacturers rather than a couple of large ones.

Did they do this out of the kindness of their hearts

No they did it to create a new market for a product they produce while offering benefits to potential customers. It’s the reason why any product is created. It’s literally how commerce works.

or to create a standard they control to their own benefit?

It’s an open tech spec, not too different from how virtually every other memory and storage spec is created, except the resulting spec requires no membership with JEDEC.

Russia-Linked ‘Midnight Blizzard’ Group Hijacks Hotel Wi-Fi With CaptiveCrunch

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
A Russia-linked group tracked as Midnight Blizzard has compromised hotel and conference Wi-Fi portals worldwide, redirecting guests to phishing pages and fake software updates that steal credentials, session tokens, and other sensitive data. Microsoft says the campaign, dubbed CaptiveCrunch, “targets traveling employees generally rather than a particular sector,” reports iTNews. From the report:
Midnight Blizzard, tracked internally by Microsoft under its earlier codename NOBELIUM, is attributed by the US and UK governments to Russia’s SVR (Sluzhba Vneshney Razvedki) foreign intelligence service. Microsoft’s technical analysis said compromises occurred in “several countries” without naming them, and it did not give a total number of affected venues, organisations or individuals.

A related investigation published earlier in July by security firm ReliaQuest, and which Microsoft cited in its report, found compromised captive portal gateways across multiple United States cities as well as in India and Saudi Arabia, mostly at hotels. ReliaQuest said the traffic it observed came from organizations across financial services, professional services, legal, health care, energy and retail, suggesting the campaign targets traveling employees generally rather than a particular sector.

[…] Where attackers gained a foothold, Microsoft said they deployed two main tools: CornFlake, a Windows remote access trojan (RAT) written in Go capable of keylogging, screenshot and webcam capture, audio surveillance and credential and session token theft. They would also drop ChocoShell, an in-memory PowerShell infostealer targeting browser cookies, saved passwords, Microsoft 365 single sign-on (SSO) tokens and wi-fi credentials. Microsoft also said it has seen indications the attackers might be targeting Android devices with similar prompts urging victims to download and install an APK file.

DEFCON

By backslashdot • Score: 5, Funny Thread

I’m not too worried, as hotels should have these patched within two weeks. Just thank God there’s no hacker conference this weekend in a city like Las Vegas, which has the most hotel rooms in America.

Don’t most hotels outsource their wifi?

By King_TJ • Score: 3 Thread

I don’t do a lot of traveling, but I remember when I last worked at a job that involved some travel? The ongoing “wisdom” was a realization that the cheaper hotels had the most usable/reliable wifi. The expensive ones tended to use Internet as a service to upsell, with annoying portals trying to bill you a daily rate and generally interfering with your applications. (They might, for example, lock down just about all ports except 80 and 443, meaning you couldn’t get software updates to complete or connect a VPN, or ....)

The basic chains, by contrast, all seemed to used “canned” wifi setups sold to them by third party vendors, and as long as you got a decent signal in your room, you were good.

In any case, I never trusted a hotel wifi to be super-secure. Heck, I remember on a Vegas trip one time, they had it set up so wifi was capped at a slow rate unless you paid a premium. I was curious about a wired jack I found behind the bed and plugged into it. Turns out, it gave me a full gigabit network connection and bypassed their sign-in portal and everything. They seemed to just not realize or expect guests would still carry ethernet cables with them and try to use a wired connection.

Spain Offers $1.14 Billion To Get Thirty Meter Telescope Moved To Canary Islands

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot
Longtime Slashdot reader schwit1 shares a report from Behind the Black:
In a new bid to get the Thirty Meter Telescope (TMT) to move from Hawaii, which has blocked its construction for more than a decade, the Spanish government has put together a $1.14 billion package that would not only pay for construction on the Canary Islands, but would finance an additional half century of operations.
Tech Times provides some additional details:
The package is conditional on the TMT International Observatory formally choosing La Palma as its construction site. The financing architecture has three pillars and two additional contingent instruments. The first pillar is 400 million euros (approximately $456 million USD) from Spain’s Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities, routed through the Centre for Technological Development and Innovation (CDTI). This figure was first pledged a year ago in July 2025 as Spain’s initial bid.

The second pillar is a 300 million-euro (approximately $342 million USD) loan from the EIB [European Investment Bank] itself — subject to satisfactory completion of the bank’s technical, financial, and legal due diligence and approval by its governing bodies.

The third is a potential 300 million-euro (approximately $342 million USD) participation from the Instituto de Credito Oficial (ICO), Spain’s state development finance institution, evaluated under equivalent conditions to the EIB loan but subject to its own separate analysis. Spain’s export credit agency, Cesce, may also provide coverage instruments, and the EIB has left open the possibility of expanding its support through intermediated financing mechanisms or guarantees.

Re: Hawaii blocked the TMT for more than a decade

By Ol Olsoc • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I don’t understand - what better monument to the sky gods could you build than an absolutely fecking mahoosive telescope?

The “Native Hawaiians” want us the Haole out of there, the blocking of the Space Telescope is just a way of messing with those they hate.

Re: Let them choose

By swillden • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Why not let the people who were first on the land choose? Europeans decimated indigenous Americans with disease and war..

Right, the land rightfully belongs to whoever owned it second-to-last! Not to the people the second-to-last owners forcibly ejected from it, of course, and not to the people who own it now, only to the second-to-last.

</sarcasm>

I think we should have more respect than we do for the indigenous peoples, but pretending that there was no war and no forcible land grabs before the Europeans arrived is not just ahistorical but ignorant of human nature. Polynesian history, which includes the Hawaiians, is incredibly bloody. The Europeans dominated when they arrived not because they were more violent — there’s a good case to be made that they were less, though it’s a question of degrees, not kind — but because the Enlightenment gave them much better tools. And, of course, because centuries of city living had bred up a bunch of diseases, but that’s part of the same story.

Did European arms and power make it “right” that the natives were conquered? No. But it wasn’t “right” that the natives conquered each other, either. Humanity — also as a result of the Enlightenment and the long, slow development of humanism — has become more moral and less violent, and we now have more respect for other cultures and other peoples. And that’s a good thing! But it doesn’t make sense to project our own moral views back in time, and it definitely doesn’t make sense to do so selectively, demonizing the winners and lionizing the losers.

The only thing that really makes sense is to apply our improved (though still very imperfect) morality to the situation we have now, messy, complicated and conflicted as it is. It’s nice to give the native Hawaiian culture some respect, but it’s wrong to give it more respect than that of Hawaii today.

Business Interests

By Wdi • Score: 5, Informative Thread

At least some of the most vocal opponents organize, in collaboration with energy drink maker Red Bull, motocross races on the slope of the volcano, right up to the top. These will have to stop because of the dust they produce. Just maybe there are real religious objections, but certainly there is money.

Re:Business Interests

By Rei • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

I take native Hawaiian religious objections seriously. These are people who take a fatalistic “Pele will take what she wants, it’s pointless to try to stop her” attitude toward lava flows running over their houses that seems utterly insane here in Iceland. We’ll buy up every available water pump on the international market and walk on active-flowing lava fields to save a harbour for a couple thousand people. We’ll keep running tourist sites right next to a volcano that erupts every couple months by building multi-story-high berms around it with giant bulldozers and cooling anything that tries to overtop to make the berms even higher. And it totally works . But Hawaiians will sit back and watch incredibly slow-flowing flows with easy diversion paths take out everything they hold dear. At best they’ll point to some primitive failed attempts in like the 1940s as a reason to not try, but then when pressed, it often comes back to: “Pele will take what she wants to take.”

Another example: geothermal drilling on the Big Island. Massive protests. Massive resistance, way beyond the token NIMBY resistance here. Meanwhile Hawaii continues to generate most of its electricity from oil, at great cost. Hawaii is the only other place (outside of Iceland) to have accidentally drilled into a magma chamber. In Hawaii they treated it as a major incident and immediately shut down the well. When we did it? Our reaction was, “WOW, we can produce REALLY hot steam from THIS well!”, made it into a production well, and started planning to drill more.

I guess one major difference here is that in the early Icelandic cosmology, volcanoes weren’t the product of a high-ranking creator goddess, but rather, Surtr, who was practically a demon and was fated to destroy the world. It’s good to resist Surtr!

Re: Hawaii blocked the TMT for more than a decade

By Voice of satan • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Yes, scientific conferences are being either cancelled or see half attendance for more than a year now. They move to Asia and Europe. People disappear entering the US legally. Some people have wound up dead. Some have been jailed for social media posts. And being European and relatively rich doesn’t protect you. Even the Ig Nobels have moved outside the USA because some winners refused to come fetch their prizes. Too dangerous.

Besides, it has been way more than a year it is official policy for public researchers of some EU countries to have the same instructions to go to the US than going to China.

- Buy a blank computer with zero data on it.
- No phone
- Once at your hotel, download your data from the cloud
- You can buy a local phone if you desire.
- Go to conference
- After the conference, discard the computer and the phone if you bought one.
- Cross the border empty-handed.
- And before all, consider if a travel to the USA is absolutely necessary

These ones come from French researchers. As i said, it is official policy.

Besides, i heard Honolulu is overrated. ;)

When i am at it, a friend of mine working in Germany has moved from the Automobile industry to the defense industry. One of the entry conditions was to be:

- Citizen of a NATO country
- NOT a citizen of the United States

And i have already been told shedding my double nationality would not be enough for some defense related work. The simple fact i have lived several years in the US seem to be a liability for some.

It is hardly surprising if you open a newspaper from time to time.