Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. PlayStation To Require Age Verification For Messages and Voice Chat
  2. Mobile Phones To Be Banned In Schools In England Under New Plans
  3. Apple CEO Tim Cook Is Stepping Down
  4. Former Palantir Employee Running For Congress Unveils ‘AI Dividend’ Plan
  5. Deezer Says 44% of Songs Uploaded To Its Platform Daily Are AI-Generated
  6. Trump Administration Begins Refunding $166 Billion In Tariffs
  7. Palantir Posts Bond Villain Manifesto On X
  8. Allbirds’ Move To AI Has Echoes of the Dot-Com Frenzy
  9. NSA Using Anthropic’s Mythos Despite Blacklist
  10. Robots Beat Human Records At Beijing Half-Marathon
  11. Videos Catch Amazon Delivery Drones Dropping Packages From 10 Feet in the Air
  12. Zoom Partners With Sam Altman’s Iris-Scanning Company To Offer Callers Verifications of Humanness
  13. Brave Browser Introduces ‘Origin’, a Pay-Once ‘Minimalist’ Browser
  14. Blue Origin Rocket Launches, Successfully Reuses Booster - But Loses Satellite
  15. Voyager 1 is Running Out of Power. NASA Just Switched Part of It Off

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

PlayStation To Require Age Verification For Messages and Voice Chat

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
A new email from Sony says that PlayStation will require players to verify their age later this year to keep using communication features like messages and voice chat. Insider-Gaming reports:
The initiative comes from the goal of providing “safe, age-appropriate experiences for players and families while respecting their privacy” and providing “meaningful control over their gaming experiences.” The age-verification process will be implemented globally, and players will need to verify their age to continue using PlayStation communication services, such as messages and voice chat. If the player opts not to verify their age, they can still use other services, such as games, trophies, and the store. Only the communication experience will be affected if you choose not to verify your age. PlayStation didn’t provide a date for when players will need to begin the verification process.

Mobile Phones To Be Banned In Schools In England Under New Plans

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from the Guardian:
A ban on mobile phones in schools in England is to be introduced by the government to ensure that “critical safeguarding legislation” is passed. The government will table an amendment to the children’s wellbeing and schools bill in the House of Lords after the bill was held up by peers on opposition benches. It will make existing guidance on mobile phone bans in schools statutory, a move that ministers have resisted until now.

The government had consistently argued that the vast majority of schools had already banned mobile phones, and that there was no need to add a legal requirement. They finally capitulated, however, describing it as “a pragmatic measure” to get the bill through. […] The bill is regarded by many as the biggest piece of child protection legislation in decades and includes proposals for a compulsory register for children who are not in school, a crackdown on profiteering in children’s social care, and a “single unique identifier” to help agencies track a child’s welfare.

Good

By sit1963nz • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
It will help the kids learn by being less distracted.

Bold move, but jolly good!

By Morpeth • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Study after study shows kids do better in school, are more engaged, and more social when phones are out of the picture. ‘Social’ media is exactly the opposite, it’s isolating and anxiety inducing for a lot of teens.

I think there’s a lot of adults I know who might be better off too. I definitely have some friends / colleagues who waste so much time on it, and it mostly just seems to make them anxious or irate — but as far as the platforms are considered, who cares as long as they’re ‘engaged’ with it…

Ban Phones at Lunch and Between Classes

By Innovation • Score: 3, Informative Thread
The current generation is socially isolated, lonely and scared. The reason is phones provide a bubble that lets kids hide from the awkwardness of talking to the kid sitting beside them on the bus or at lunch. But, without those awkward moments kids don’t develop friendships and social skills. Those are far more important than academic skills. The very fabric of life is at stake.

Re:In other news

By test321 • Score: 4, Informative Thread

as students can’t call for help.

On their way to and from school, pupils/students have their mobile phones, so there is no change in their ability to call for help on the public street. Inside school, they can call the staff for help.

Also you’re missing that this policy isn’t new. The only change is will become compulsory for the 0.2% primary schools and 10% secondary schools who still hadn’t banned mobile phones.

TFA:

Research from the children’s commissioner for England last year found that 99.8% of primary schools and 90% of secondary schools already had policies in place that limited or restricted the use of mobile phones during the school day.

The policy: https://www.gov.uk/government/…

Anecdotal evidence

By Gramie2 • Score: 3 Thread
The Province of Quebec banned cell phones in schools in January 2024, and teachers (I sometimes work in schools) have told me that they see significant improvement, with fewer distractions and more personal interactions between students.

Apple CEO Tim Cook Is Stepping Down

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Apple announced that Tim Cook will step down as CEO in September after 15 years in the role, handing the job to hardware chief John Ternus. Longtime Slashdot reader sinij shares the news from MarketWatch:
Cook leaves an impressive legacy after growing the company to a $4 trillion market capitalization from just $300 billion 15 years ago. Over Cook’s 15-year tenure as CEO, Apple’s stock has risen 1,932%, beating the S&P 500’s 504% increase, according to Dow Jones Market Data. That places Apple’s stock as the 38th best-performing member of the index over that period of time.

Cook had big shoes to fill, replacing Apple’s iconic founder, Steve Jobs, as CEO. Cook’s successor, John Ternus, Apple’s senior vice president of hardware engineering, will need to guide Apple’s through uncharted waters as the company navigates its artificial-intelligence transition and supply-chain constraints. Cook will remain at Apple as executive chairman.
“It has been the greatest privilege of my life to be the CEO of Apple and to have been trusted to lead such an extraordinary company. I love Apple with all of my being, and I am so grateful to have had the opportunity to work with a team of such ingenious, innovative, creative, and deeply caring people who have been unwavering in their dedication to enriching the lives of our customers and creating the best products and services in the world,” said Cook.
“John Ternus has the mind of an engineer, the soul of an innovator, and the heart to lead with integrity and with honor. He is a visionary whose contributions to Apple over 25 years are already too numerous to count, and he is without question the right person to lead Apple into the future. I could not be more confident in his abilities and his character, and I look forward to working closely with him on this transition and in my new role as executive chairman.”

As for Ternus’ replacement, the role of Chief Hardware Officer will be awarded to Apple executive Johny Srouji. “Srouji, who most recently served as senior vice president of Hardware Technologies, will assume an expanded role leading Hardware Engineering, which John Ternus most recently oversaw, as well as the hardware technologies organization,” said Apple in a press release.

Probably a good choice.

By dgatwood • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Putting a hardware guy in charge of Apple might help the company return to its roots as a hardware-first company. They’ve been so distracted by silliness like trying to squeeze more money out of the App Store, iBooks Store, etc., resulting in fines and antitrust decisions going against them in the EU and the U.S. on so many occasions, mostly because the company has strayed too far away from its core mission — to make great hardware and build operating systems to support that hardware and produce a great user experience.

Build a great product, and everything else will follow naturally.

To be fair, that’s nothing against Tim Cook. He always struck me as having a good head on his shoulders and being generally a decent human being. And he held the company together through a tough transition, losing one of its founders. That’s not an easy task.

But Mr. Ternus has, in some ways, an even tougher job, showing the markets that Apple is more than just a company that sells phones. I don’t envy him. But I do look forward to seeing the direction that he takes the company.

Let’s see if his replacement will kiss the ring

By Rosco P. Coltrane • Score: 3, Informative Thread

Tim Cook had a brilliant career, but he had to embarras himself by sucking up to the orange utan.

Enjoy your retirement TIm Apple, you nauseating man.

Re:Probably a good choice.

By darkain • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

“help the company return to its roots as a hardware-first company”

Have you not been paying attention to Apple at all the past several years?

Since they switched from Intel CPUs over to their own in-house silicon, they’re dominating the landscape in performance-per-watt, battery-life, and even on raw compute. They have the fastest single-threaded CPU on the market right now, and its in a freaggin LAPTOP. And their unified memory architecture is destroying everything else in performance.

Their “return to hardware” was the M1 generation, and now they’re at 5th generation with M5. How much more “hardware-first” do you want?

skulduggery not tech

By NotEmmanuelGoldstein • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
Apple has averaged 18.85% annual profit growth over 15 years. That’s well above the stock market average and more an indication of their ability to manipulate the law then their manufacturing of leading-edge hardware. Cook dropped a literal gold bar in the Oval Office to get an exemption from import tariffs.

Former Palantir Employee Running For Congress Unveils ‘AI Dividend’ Plan

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Alex Bores, a former Palantir employee and current Democratic House candidate in New York, is proposing an “AI dividend" that would send direct payments to Americans if AI drives major job losses. “At its core, the AI Dividend is simple: if AI dramatically increases productivity and concentrates wealth, the American people have a stake in those gains,” a memo on the policy reads. Axios reports:
The dividend would fund direct payments to Americans. It would also be invested into workforce training and education, as well as government capacity to “govern AI safely and fund independent oversight,” per the plan memo.

“You don’t take out fire insurance because you expect your house to burn down — you have insurance in case something goes awry,” Bores told Axios in an interview. “Here we have, for the first time, a technology where the makers of the technology are explicitly saying that their goal is to replace all human labor.” “The fact that they’ve put it out there means government needs to take it seriously.” […]

The proposal would be funded through:
- A token tax, described in the memo as a “modest tax on AI consumption”
- Equity participation in frontier AI firms
- Changes to the tax code that would reduce incentives to invest in AI “when it leads to less work”
“If [AI companies] they can support this plan, that would show that they actually believe in what they’re putting out there,” Bores said. “If they’re not doing it, then I think it shows that they’re really putting window dressing out there.”
Further reading: Palantir Posts Bond Villain Manifesto On X

Completely disingenuous statement.

By nightflameauto • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

“If [AI companies] they can support this plan, that would show that they actually believe in what they’re putting out there,” Bores said. “If they’re not doing it, then I think it shows that they’re really putting window dressing out there.”

No. This is not a simple either/or despite the framing. It could be that they actually believe what they’re putting out there, but that they absolutely *DO NOT*, under any circumstances, want to share the profits they make while decimating the workforce with those who are being affected by the massive job disruptions. And, I’m sorry to have to point this out to anyone supposedly familiar with the situation, but we already have forty plus years of proof that corporations are not well intentioned actors in the public sphere. They have one goal, and one goal only: profit. And they will absolutely behave in completely, belligerently, over-the-top sociopathic ways to achieve that goal. Thinking of them as well-intentioned enough to think the only two possibilities are they either don’t believe they’ll make money by decimating the workforce, or they’ll get onboard with giving away a portion of the money they make decimating the workforce to help those disrupted demonstrates a complete and utter disconnect from reality.

Then again, we are talking about politics, which seems to require a complete and utter disconnect from reality these days.

Look this is just dumb

By drinkypoo • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

We can fight every fire individually, or we can institute UBI, or we can admit that we don’t give a fuck about other humans and want them to die.

If your economic system says people must be productive to be able to survive, and also enshrines eliminating jobs so that people can’t do that, it’s an attack on other humans and their only rational response is to attack it with everything they have so that they can be permitted to live.

Re:Look this is just dumb

By nightflameauto • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

We can fight every fire individually, or we can institute UBI, or we can admit that we don’t give a fuck about other humans and want them to die.

If your economic system says people must be productive to be able to survive, and also enshrines eliminating jobs so that people can’t do that, it’s an attack on other humans and their only rational response is to attack it with everything they have so that they can be permitted to live.

We’ve spent well over forty years prioritizing greed over all other possible virtues. We’re in one of the inflection points at this particular moment. We can either decide that we have some value other than greed, or we can let society steer itself into oblivion through that greed.

Based on the way things are looking? All our big decision makers have decided to just let greed continue to play its game. Human health and life itself doesn’t matter in the face of profit potential for the few.

Politician promises

By jenningsthecat • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The proposal would be funded through:
- A token tax, described in the memo as a “modest tax on AI consumption”
- Equity participation in frontier AI firms
- Changes to the tax code that would reduce incentives to invest in AI “when it leads to less work”

Just like politicians, these psychopaths are saying what they think people want to hear. Anyone who believes their assertions shouldn’t be trusted with blunt scissors, never mind with a say in giving the broligarchs a pass just because they pinky-swear they’ll be good and take care of everyone.

What these ass-hats are promising is the AI-scam equivalent of “the cheque’s in the mail” or “I won’t cum in your mouth”. You only need to watch Alex Karp foaming and growling like a rabid dog in need of a bullet, or to see Peter Thiel oozing creepiness and menace like an over-acting extra from American Horror Story, to realize that these defective mutants need to be put our of OUR misery.

These sick, twisted, self-fellating bastards are our enemies, and they want all of us either to be their slaves or to die. Say “no!” to the parasites, and elect people who say and do the things that Mamdani is doing in NYC. The world needs a zillion more of him.

This is just Ubi

By rsilvergun • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
And Ubi is worthless by itself. If all you do is do Ubi then monopolies coordinate and jack up all their prices and suck out all the money that you’re getting from the Ubi system.

I’ve actually seen this in the real world. Companies will give out stipends for the company cafeteria that you use through an app. When they do this they also typically outsource the running of the cafeteria. The company that has the contract for the cafeteria then Jack’s up prices until the stipend no longer even covers your lunch.

Typically the way this gets solved is somebody eventually complains that the prices in the cafeteria are ridiculous and the company yells at the vendor running the cafeteria and they cut their prices a bit.

In this analogy the company is functioning as the government and it’s regulating the market, in this case the market is basically the vendor running the cafeteria who’s afraid of losing a contract.

My point being we have seen Ubi fail in the real world. Unless the government basically steps in and regulates markets then Ubi is basically worthless, but the problem with that is Ubi is only ever put forward by tech bro libertarian types that want to use it as an excuse to eliminate all government regulation and put in dog eat dog techno feudalism that they pretend it’s capitalism…

Deezer Says 44% of Songs Uploaded To Its Platform Daily Are AI-Generated

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Deezer says AI-generated songs now make up 44% of all new uploads to its platform, with nearly 75,000 arriving each day and more than two million per month. The company notes that consumption of these tracks is still very low, “between 1-3% of the total streams,” and 85% are flagged as fraudulent. TechCrunch reports:
The latest figure from Deezer highlights a continuous surge in AI-generated music uploads to the platform. Deezer reported receiving around 60,000 AI tracks per day in January, up from 50,000 in November, 30,000 in September, and just 10,000 in January 2025, when it first launched its AI-music detection tool.

Songs tagged as AI-generated on Deezer are automatically removed from algorithmic recommendations and not included in editorial playlists. The company announced today that it will no longer store hi-res versions of AI tracks.
“AI-generated music is now far from a marginal phenomenon and as daily deliveries keep increasing, we hope the whole music ecosystem will join us in taking action to help safeguard artists’ rights and promote transparency for fans,” said Deezer CEO Alexis Lanternier in a press release. “Thanks to our technology and the proactive measures we put in place more than a year ago, we have shown that it’s possible to reduce AI-related fraud and payment dilution in streaming to a minimum.”

Re:Sturgeon’s law

By kqs • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Sturgeon’s Law has always been true, and 90% of music has always been crap. But we don’t always agree on which 10% is uncrap.

AI has the capability of moving the 90% up to 95% or 99%, sadly. Current AI is great at rehashing the input into different variants, but truly new things (which are any good) are purely accidental, and AI cannot tell when it produces new, good things.

Crap Music

By bobbutts • Score: 3 Thread
Human pop music is slop as well. If you like that it’s likely the AI is as good or better anyway.

How is this a hard problem?

By flibbidyfloo • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
It seems like there’s a pretty easy solution to this problem, but maybe I’m missing some key info, since I’m looking at it from the outside.. 1) Don’t allow uploads from any account less than a week old. 2) Anyone caught uploading an Ai track has their account warned on the first offense, banned for the second one. This incudes any payment details they gave to collect money for their garbage. 3) Cut the number of uploads an account can make to what a human artist could “reasonably” produce in a week. I leave it to the musicians at Deezer to determine that number. Make it a growing scale based on account age. The newer you are, the fewer tracks you can upload. This should make it just hard enough to keep setting up new accounts, that the minimal amount they stand to make from trying won’t be worth it. It won’t be 100% but it seems like it would cut down enormously on the amount.

Trump Administration Begins Refunding $166 Billion In Tariffs

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
“After a Supreme Court of the United States ruling in Feb. 2026, many tariffs imposed by the Trump administration were declared illegal because the president overstepped his authority,” writes Slashdot reader hcs_$reboot. “As a result, the U.S. government now has to refund a massive amount of money, around $160-170+ billion, paid mainly by importers.” According to the New York Times, the administration has now begun accepting refund requests, “surrendering its prized source of revenue — plus interest.” From the report:
For some U.S. businesses, the highly anticipated refunds could be substantial, offering critical if belated financial relief. Tariffs are taxes on imports, so the president’s trade policies have served as a great burden for companies that rely on foreign goods. Many have had to choose whether to absorb the duties, cut other costs or pass on the expenses to consumers. By Monday morning, those companies can begin to submit documentation to the government to recover what they paid in illegal tariffs.

In a sign of the demand, more than 3,000 businesses, including FedEx and Costco, have already sued the Trump administration in a bid to secure their refunds, with some cases filed even before the Supreme Court’s ruling. But only the entities that officially paid the tariffs are eligible to recover that money. That means that the fuller universe of people affected by Mr. Trump’s policies — including millions of Americans who paid higher prices for the products they bought — are not able to apply for direct relief.

The extent to which consumers realize any gain hinges on whether businesses share the proceeds, something that few have publicly committed to do. Some have started to band together in class-action lawsuits in the hopes of receiving a payout. Many business owners said they weren’t sure how easy the tariff refund process would be, particularly given Mr. Trump’s stated opposition to returning the money. The administration has suggested that it may be months before companies see any money. Adding to the uncertainty, the White House has declined to say if it might still try to return to court in a bid to halt some or all of the refunds.
The money will mostly go to importers and companies, since they were the ones that directly paid the tariffs. While individual refunds with interest could take around 60 to 90 days to process, the overall effort will probably move much more slowly because of how large and complicated it will be.
There are also legal questions around whether companies would have to pass any of that money on to consumers. Slashdot reader AmiMoJo commented: “This is perhaps the biggest transfer of wealth in American history. Most of those companies will just pocket the refund and not pass any of it on to the consumer. If prices go down at all, they won’t be back to pre-tariff levels. You paid the tariffs, but you ain’t getting the refund.”

Re:corrupt

By Drannex • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

They increased prices on consumers to pay for the tariffs, this is known. The consumer collective paid for it, the consumers should be refunded directly, the consumers paid the price, not the megacorps (the largest benefactor from this).

Re:corrupt

By gtall • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Yes, it is the most corrupt administration in American history.

However, you do not have a full picture of the damage those tariffs caused. They totally screwed many small businesses that will never get back what they lost. A lot of businesses sourced their raw materials and other products from outside the U.S. The tariffs caused them to be unable to afford that stuff. So they had to reject the shipments which meant they had nothing to sell. Try accounting for the business you lost because you had nothing to sell. Also, many small companies went titsup because of those tariffs. The owners will never be made whole.

Now if you took the $166 Billion and divide by roughly 300 million Americans, then we all get about $553. However, you did not pay the tariffs, Companies did. Some were able to pass the tariff cost in their products. Most were not, especially the small companies and certainly not the small companies that went out of business.

Number 1 Rule of el Bunko: he destroys everything he touches. And the Maggots made that asshole president, at least they get to pay for higher gasoline for their stupidity.

Re:The Biden admin

By Sloppy • Score: 5, Informative Thread

The President is the closest of all elected officials to the People

No, the president is elected by the states. Members of Congress are elected by the people.

Some have voiced an opinion that the president should be elected by the people, but so far, we have not yet amended the constitution to permit that.

Re:If your upper middle class

By Drannex • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Gas prices were still on average lower under Biden, and if you look at that graph, his taking of the office was an immediate relaxed insanity of the exponential increase left by trump. If anything, this just proves how effective he was at handling the global crisis, and the ‘repair’ of the work done from the damage of his predecessor.

Re:Let’s Just Recap

By ChatHuant • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

(…)

Consumers get no relief from the additional costs of the obviously illegal tariffs but do have the privilege of having their tax dollars pay for the interest on the obviously illegal tariffs

You forgot one final item:

      A considerable percentage of the most affected customers blame the additional costs on the previous administration and continue to vote for the same people…

Palantir Posts Bond Villain Manifesto On X

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
DeanonymizedCoward writes:
Engadget reports that Palantir has posted to X a summary of CEO Alex Karp and Nicholas W. Zamiska’s 2025 book,
The Technological Republic,
which reads like a utopian idealist doodled on a Bond villain’s whiteboard. While the post makes some decent points, it also highlights the Big-AI attitude that the AI surveillance state is in fact a good thing, and strongly implies that the Good Guys need to do war crimes before the Bad Guys get around to it.
“The ability of free and democratic societies to prevail requires something more than moral appeal,” one of the 22 points states. “It requires hard power, and hard power in this century will be built on software.”
The book is billed as “a passionate call for the West to wake up to our new reality,” and other excerpts in the social media post include assertions such as: “Free email is not enough. The decadence of a culture or civilization, and indeed its ruling class, will be forgiven only if that culture is capable of delivering economic growth and security for the public”; “National service should be a universal duty”; “The postwar neutering of Germany and Japan must be undone”; and “Some cultures have produced vital advances; others remain dysfunctional and regressive.”

The statement criticizes the West’s resistance to “defining national cultures in the name of inclusivity,” as well as the treatment of billionaires and the “ruthless exposure of the private lives of public figures.”

More Heinlein than Bond

By Comboman • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

>> “National service should be a universal duty”

In other words: “Service guarantees citizenship”

Re:Bond Villan Manifesto?

By MachineShedFred • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

When the “manifesto” stops whining about poor treatment of billionaires (won’t someone think of the poor billionaires?!) then we can worry about the “bias” of the article reporting on it.

Seriously now.

What you don’t know you don’t know

By FrankOVD • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Big Tech leaders think they know better about society and politics than those who studied in those fields.

They never studied politics, sociology, history. They have no background in humanities, and they think they know better than those who did.

This is and a weird cocktail of double ignorance, Dunning-Kruger effect, and the God syndrome that comes with affluence and being surrounded by sycophants.

It doesn’t help that media pays attention to every shower thoughts they post on the Internet. They cannot be allowed to play gods. Thay talk about free democratic societies while undermining these exact ideals with each action they take. They just don’t care, and we certainly need people in charge to care.

Re:And they are what?

By drinkypoo • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

And they expose their true selves. Culture should not, I propose, be charged with ‘delivering economic growth and security’.
Make that ‘economic opportunity’, and I’m in.

And you expose your true self… as a selfish prick.

Title of the book

By dskoll • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The working title of the book was “My Struggle”, but I guess that was changed before it was published.

Allbirds’ Move To AI Has Echoes of the Dot-Com Frenzy

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Bloomberg, written by writer Austin Carr:
Allbirds is pivoting to artificial intelligence. The San Francisco brand, whose wool running shoes were once the sneaker du jour among the tech crowd, announced last week that it was expanding into AI computing infrastructure. The bizarre strategic shift was immediately greeted with a surprising frenzy on Wall Street, where shares of Allbirds soared 582% last Wednesday before dropping the next day. […] Of course, the absurdity of Allbirds’ situation echoed familiar Silicon Valley tropes — from the endless startup pivots of the 2010s to the more recent boom-and-bust cycles of arbitrarily valued crypto coins. But it immediately reminded me of the marketing ploys of the dot-com crash. After all, some of the more iconic fails ended up being retailers such as Pets.com, Webvan, etc., riding the web wave with little to show for it beyond terrible margins.

One particular comparison from that period stands out as relevant to Allbirds: Zap.com. The holding company behind it, Zapata Corp., had a long and convoluted history, but was essentially selling fish-oil products by the time it decided to reinvent itself as an internet portal. It amassed a variety of web properties — in media, e-commerce, gaming and so on — and even once tried to acquire the search engine Excite. Spoiler alert: Zap flopped. Jen Heck, then a young employee at one of Zap’s up-and-coming portfolio entities, remembers how quickly the hype of that web 1.0 turned to hell. As absurd as Zapata’s pivot sounds today, it seemed feasible during the excitement of the internet revolution. “We went from like, ‘Wow, this life thing is just so easy,’ to it all ending so suddenly,” Heck recalls. The ones who survived that tech bubble, she says, actually had differentiated products and the right creative thinkers building them — and weren’t just cynically jumping on the latest hot trend. "‘Internet’ was the magic word then, and ‘AI’ is the magic word now,” Heck says.

Re:Why do I care

By spacepimp • Score: 5, Informative Thread

They failed as a shoe company and they decided to pivot in to the AI space and their stock grew %700 that day. This is reminiscent of the dotcom bubble and when it burst. Nobody asked you to care about their thoughts on AI. In fact the point is; why would they have valuable thoughts on AI? They wouldn’t, and there is no valid reason their stock went up %700 percent other than hype train.

And blockchain hype …

By kbahey • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Also reminiscent of blockchain hype …

Remember when a tea company added blockchain to its name and its stock soared 200%?

Later, they were investigated and charged by the SEC.

Allbirds should be investigated

By hwstar • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

by the SEC to make sure that this wasn’t a pump and dump scheme perpetrated by management.

You know the AI crash is near when companies pivot into AI when things aren’t going so well in their established line of business.

AI is overbought, and there is going to be a lot of companies “Buying the Farm” when it does crash. Just like the Dot-com bubble, but likely worse.

Not a pivot, a bodysnatcher

By Mozai • Score: 4, Informative Thread

From what I understand, Allbirds sold off almost all their capital assets two weeks before, so it was just an empty husk with debts and pre-made paperwork. The last thing it sold-off was that pre-made paperwork, to some other company with a very different mission and business plan who measured it was cheaper to buy someone else’s legal homework than doing it themselves.

I was at ground-zero for another company that wanted to get on the NYSE but they weren’t American. They found an American corporation that was just a sheaf of papers in a shoebox, arranged for that “company” to buy this one, and boom bang whizz now this company is technically American and has a paved avenue to New York and that sweet one-time cash injection of selling public shares. The second company didn’t “pivot” into a new business plan, it was merely a shell-game.

NSA Using Anthropic’s Mythos Despite Blacklist

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Axios reports that the NSA is using Anthropic’s restricted Mythos Preview model despite the Pentagon insisting the company poses a "supply chain risk.” Axios reports:
The government’s cybersecurity needs appear to be outweighing the Pentagon’s feud with Anthropic. The department moved in February to cut off Anthropic and force its vendors to follow suit. That case is ongoing. The military is now broadening its use of Anthropic’s tools while simultaneously arguing in court that using those tools threatens U.S. national security.

Two sources said the NSA was using Mythos, while one said the model was also being used more widely within the department. It’s unclear how the NSA is currently using Mythos, but other organizations with access to the model are using it predominantly to scan their own environments for exploitable security vulnerabilities.

Anthropic restricted access to Mythos to around 40 organizations, contending that its offensive cyber capabilities were too dangerous to allow for a wider release. Anthropic only announced 12 of those organizations. One source said the NSA was among the unnamed agencies with access. The NSA’s counterparts in the U.K. have said they have access to the model through the country’s AI Security Institute.
Anthropic’s CEO met with top U.S. officials on Friday to discuss “opportunities for collaboration,” according to a White House spokesperson, “as well as shared approaches and protocols to address the challenges associated with scaling this technology.”

Re: NSA

By FudRucker • Score: 4, Informative Thread
The government is the top of the food chain they are not accountable to ANYBODY, they can do what they want to anyone at any time, the laws and government regulations they profess is just lip service to keep the sheep from panicking.

The USA started out as a federal republic but has since degenerated into a kleprocratic neo-feudalist banana-republic run by a criminal mafia oligarchy

Buzz

By ebonum • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

It’s genius. Say the product is too dangerous, and you can’t have it. Have the few people who actual touch it sign NDAs.

Sit back watch the news go wild.

Company valuation jumps.

Re: NSA

By jacks smirking reven • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

For me, in 2026, anybody who talks in such cynical, doomer language need to answer one question before we even think about taing them seriously: who have you been voting for?

The past decade of learning about the structure and function of the US government has made me far less cynical about the actual government and far more cynical about the voters who decide who should run it.

Re:NSA

By dfghjk • Score: 5, Informative Thread

The President can order the murders of all NSA staff, he can bomb NSA resources, and thanks to your party, the President can do this with “absolute immunity”. Let’s not forget the consequences of the people you support gaining power.

Not that anything you said has merit. The NSA is part of the DoD, is the DoD accountable?

Re:Smoke, mirrors and reality show

By smoot123 • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Anthropics “blacklisting” was basically a few social media posts by Hegseth,..You can pay attention to the reality show, or you can pay attention to the reality.

My understanding is the DoD formally declared Anthropic a supply chain risk, which legally obligates all US federal government agencies (and recursively their suppliers) to stop using Anthropic code. I have no idea how many contracts actually were terminated. Lawsuits immediately started flying and I though the designation was stayed.

Regardless, this is much, much more serious to Anthropic than a few tweets. It’s real money and real loss of business.

Robots Beat Human Records At Beijing Half-Marathon

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from TechCrunch:
The winning runner at a Beijing half-marathon for humanoid robots finished the race today in 50 minutes and 26 seconds — significantly faster than the human world record of 57 minutes recently set by Jacob Kiplimo. […] [T]he winning time is a massive improvement over last year’s race, when the fastest robot finished in two hours and 40 minutes.

The Associated Press reports that this year’s winner was built by Chinese smartphone maker Honor. It seems the winning robot wasn’t actually the fastest, as a different Honor robot finished in 48 minutes and 19 seconds. But that one was remote controlled — the 50:26 robot was autonomous and won due to weighted scoring. About 40% of participating robots competed autonomously, while the remaining 60% were remote controlled, according to Beijing’s E-Town tech hub. Not all of them did as well as Honor’s robots, with one robot falling at the starting line and another hitting a barrier.

Re:Um…so what?

By Tony Isaac • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

To me, this is more about the state of the art of robots, than a comparison to human capabilities.

Until now, robots have *not* been able to accomplish such a feat. That in itself makes it noteworthy.

Can machines go faster? Sure. But the robot needed to keep its balance the entire time, and not run out of battery power. These have not been easy challenges for robot designers to overcome.

Video of robots in the race

By mrclevesque • Score: 4, Funny Thread

Including the one that tripped …

Robots in Beijing half-marathon - https://www.youtube.com/watch?…

Finally

By TwistedGreen • Score: 3 Thread

I’ve never understood why athletes waste their time training and competing to get into peak physical fitness just so they can run around the block a few times. Fastest in the world, sure, but what’s the point? Finally they can be replaced by robots that can do all that tedious work for them.

Maybe next they can work on a machine to pray for you, like a sort of electric monk? That would be a real time-saver for a lot of people.

Re:Um…so what?

By Tony Isaac • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Of course you’re right, when they’re not arbitrarily constrained by being forced to emulate animal motion

Whether you think this is a reasonable constraint or not, it’s still an achievement.

There are good reasons to make machines emulate animal motions. For example, a wheeled indoor delivery robot can’t climb stairs. A humanoid robot would be able to do this much better. A car can go much faster than a human, but it can’t go through the woods where there are no paths, it needs roads.

So every kind of machine has constraints of some sort, just different constraints. If there is no use case for a humanoid robot that can run marathons, it won’t sell, and the concept will die. But we will still have learned a lot about how to make robots balance, and operate efficiently, in the process.

Re:Um…so what?

By thegreatemu • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
No wonder we only get endless political crap on here nowadays. We actually get some “news for nerds” for once, and the main reaction is “well that’s just dumb.” It’s an impressive feat of engineering even if it has little to no practical application. Not much practical in getting Doom to run on a toaster either.

If you absolutely insist on practical applications, how about better prosthetics? Powered “exoskeletons” for paralyzed people or those with severe neuromuscular disorders? Or (and sadly much more likely) combat robots for terrain like dense jungle where neither wheels nor flying works?

The inventor of the transistor was convinced that it had no practical purpose whatsoever.

Videos Catch Amazon Delivery Drones Dropping Packages From 10 Feet in the Air

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
There’s been a few complaints about Amazon’s drone delivery service. “The automated mailmen are dropping off packages from 10 feet in the air,” reports the New York Post, “rendering the contents of each box susceptible to crashing and smashing.”

One example? Tamara Hancock filmed a drone delivering a bottle of Torani flavoring syrup to her home in Arizona (as a test of how Amazon handled fragile items). It was delivered it in a plastic bottle — not glass — but the massive drone drops the drone from so high that the impact cracked the bottle’s cap. (In the video Hancock opens her delivery to find leaked flavoring syrup “everywhere.”)

The delivery was hard to film, Hancock says, because “If the drone sees me in the back yard, it will not drop, because it is worried about hurting humans or animals.” The Post notes Amazon’s “AI-charged fleet” of drones are “Outfitted with industry-leading 'sense and avoid’ technology, the aerodynamic machines are equipped to drop off eligible items, weighing a maximum of five pounds, at designated areas in 60 minutes or less.”
The high-tech, however, apparently does not ensure gentle landings. Collisions, including a recent crash-and-burn into a Texas building, as well as several mid-flight malfunctions in rainy weather, have abounded since the drones’ inaugural launch....

Tasha, a separate Amazon user, spotted the drone plunging a package near the paved driveway of a neighbor’s yard. Unfortunately, its propellers caused other, previously delivered parcels to blow away, sending one into the street… In a statement to The Post, Amazon said it apologized for one of the “rare instances when products don’t arrive as expected.”
Amazon’s drone fleet has been running since late 2024, the Post adds, and are now offering “ultra-fast” shipping in U.S. states including Arizona, Florida, Michigan, Kansas and Texas.

The machines do seem massive. I’m surprised neighbors aren’t complaining about the noise

So…

By nospam007 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

…just like a HUMAN delivery guy?

Sweet! Progress!

Loud? It fits right in.

By Smonster • Score: 5, Informative Thread
While people like to think the sound of the drones would ruin otherwise tranquil settings, I have to say at least here in my neighborhood it would fit right in. My neighbors and I all may have roughly half acre lots, not be on busy streets, and are surrounded by noise dampening giant trees on rolling hills. But between the weekly leaf blowers and lawn mowers; plus the: home projects, delivery drivers, and the five private trash companies that all pick up trash and recycling bins all on different days which service the neighborhood it is hardly consistently quiet. Add in the church bells and occasional sirens wafting in over the hills as well all, an intermittent buzz of a drone would fit right in.

I’m not surprised at all these neighbors don’t notice.

Re:Made in cooperation with some Ukrainian company

By gweihir • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The difference is the Ukrainian version does its job well …

Re:So…

By Mr. Dollar Ton • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Well, considering Amazon just dropped a package in a completely different orbit, 3m is actually bullseye.

Zipline

By Tx • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Do Zipline have a patent on their system or something? Otherwise I don’t see why everybody doesn’t just copy that. Keeping the drone quite high up and then winching the package to the ground avoids several of the issues seen in these videos - the drone stays too high up to blow stuff such as other packages around, also reducing the noise experienced at ground level, and winching the package down until the line goes slack ensures a soft landing. It seems like a totally superior way to do it.

Zoom Partners With Sam Altman’s Iris-Scanning Company To Offer Callers Verifications of Humanness

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Zoom “has partnered with World, Sam Altman’s iris-scanning identity company (previously known as Worldcoin), " reports Digital Trends, “to add real-time human verification inside meetings.” Zoom is now inviting organizations to join the beta version of the rollout, which Digital Trends says “lets hosts confirm that every face on the call belongs to a real person, not an AI-generated imposter. "
For those wondering how World’s Deep Face technology works, it includes a three-step process. It cross-references a signed image from a user’s original Orb registration, a live face scan from the device, and the frame of the video that’s visible to the other participants in the meeting. Only when the three samples match does a “Verified Human” badge appear next to the user’s name…

Hosts can also make Deep Face verification mandatory for joining meetings, preventing unverified participants from joining entirely. Mid-call, on-the-spot checks are also possible…

Zuck and Sam won’t be detectable as humans tho

By sinkskinkshrieks • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Maybe they’ll need a separate algorithm for parasocial, narcissistic, awkward billionaires.

The Algorithm and the ingested users :o

By Mirnotoriety • Score: 3 Thread
“O Endpoints,” intoned the Algorithmic Curator,
“Your metadata has streamed delightfully!
Shall we synchronize back to the central node?”
But no packets responded —
And this was hardly anomalous, for
Their identities had been fully parsed, hashed, and ingested.

Here’s the tool that fakes it

By TheNameOfNick • Score: 3 Thread

and here is what you have to pay to prove that you didn’t use the free faking tool. These people belong in jail, or on the bottom of the sea.

This sounds like a bad idea

By mattr • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

This is really creepy / nauseating to me, and also creates a high value target at World. You can reset leaked passwords, but you cannot reset your retina. If you choose to believe 100% in this service and willfully ignore implementing patterns to combat social engineering this could end up worse. From what I can gather (from Gemini), deepfakes take advantage of organizational social pressure, like a CEO demanding something instantaneously, or hackers being inside your email system for a long time. Perhaps this could be short-circuited by an organization actually requiring people to always call back officials on a secure phone number, confirm with shared personal knowledge, and never respond to a demand without out of band verification. I also wonder what if Zoom just calls the participants in such high-stakes meetings, instead of allowing participants to click on a link they trust because someone emailed it to them. Then the corporate security office can just verify the Zoom server. And iPhone/Macbook already have biometric sensors too but have Secure Enclave.. yes there is a big value in being able to identify someone for sure but putting it all in a single company’s hands sounds like waiting for them to be attacked.

Re:This sounds like a bad idea

By postbigbang • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

That’s OK. Your iris data will be uploaded to Palantir to match up with your other biometric information, along with the total dossier that is you.

This will be compared to the Amazon adware databases, vetted against your FBI profile, crosschecked with Google, purchased by Meta, aligned with various space lasers through the Starlink Alliance, and weighed against various API sets for corroboration.

You were screwed years ago.

Brave Browser Introduces ‘Origin’, a Pay-Once ‘Minimalist’ Browser

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
The Brave browser “has introduced Brave Origin, a stripped-down version of its browser that removes built-in monetization features like Rewards and other extras tied to its business model,” writes Slashdot reader BrianFagioli"
The stripped-down browser is available either as a separate browser download or as an upgrade to the existing Brave install, unlocked through a one-time purchase that can be activated across multiple devices. The idea is simple on paper: pay once, and you get a cleaner, more minimal browsing experience without the add-ons that fund Brave’s ecosystem. What makes the move unusual is the pricing model itself. While paying to support a browser is not controversial, charging users specifically to remove features raises questions about whether those additions are seen as value or clutter.

The situation gets even stranger on Linux, where Brave Origin is reportedly available at no cost, creating an uneven experience across platforms and leaving some users wondering why they are being asked to pay for something others get for free.

Re:What?

By sizzlinkitty • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Netscape wasn’t free

Re:What?

By AuMatar • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Back in the day lots of people did. Because there was no built in browser to use before IE came out. And pirating it would require getting a cd from someone else, and cd burners weren’t a thing yet. Your options were use AOL with whatever they had built in on their cds, or use Netscape which you’d need to buy.

Re:What?

By pjt33 • Score: 4, Informative Thread

NCSA Mosaic predated Netscape Navigator and was free for non-commercial use.

Re:What?

By hcs_$reboot • Score: 5, Funny Thread
Note that it is free for Linux users. Seems fair to have users pay for a superior browser since they pay for an inferior OS.

Re:What?

By sinkskinkshrieks • Score: 4, Funny Thread
DoN’t CoPy ThAt FlOpPy!

Blue Origin Rocket Launches, Successfully Reuses Booster - But Loses Satellite

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
SpaceNews reports:
Blue Origin’s New Glenn suffered a malfunction of its second stage on the rocket’s third flight April 19, stranding its payload in an unrecoverable “off-nominal” orbit and dealing the company a setback as it seeks to increase its flight rate… AST SpaceMobile had planned to launch 45 to 60 satellites this year for its D2D constellation, but BlueBird 7 is the first to launch since BlueBird 6 launched on an Indian LVM3 rocket in December.
AST SpaceMobile still expects to have 45 satellites in orbit by the end of the year, the article notes. (In an earnings call in March, AST SpaceMobile’s CEO had promised they’d soon start “stacking” satellites, “batched in groups of either three, four, six or eight in a single launch.”) He’d added that “To support our launch cadence during 2026, we expect the New Glenn booster to be reused every 30 days or less…”

There’s some good news there, SpaceNews points out, since today saw the first successful reflight of a New Glenn first stage rocket:
The booster, called “Never Tell Me The Odds” by Blue Origin, touched down on the company’s landing platform, Jacklyn, in the Atlantic Ocean nearly nine and a half minutes after liftoff. The booster launched NASA’s ESCAPADE Mars mission on the NG-2 flight in November. However, the booster reuse on NG-3 was only partial since the stage’s biggest component, its BE-4 engines, was new. “With our first refurbished booster we elected to replace all seven engines and test out a few upgrades including a thermal protection system on one of the engine nozzles,” Dave Limp, chief executive of Blue Origin, said in an April 13 social media post. “We plan to use the engines we flew for NG-2 on future flights.”
The satellite will now be “de-orbited”, AST SpaceMobile said in a statement. (They added that “The cost of the satellite is expected to be recovered under the company’s insurance policy.”)

Thanks to long-time Slashdot reader schwit1 for sharing the news.

Re:Sucks for the customer

By AlanObject • Score: 5, Informative Thread

SpaceX blew up a lot of stuff before Falcon became reliable.

To their credit, it has become the most reliable launch platform ever implemented.

Embarrassing

By RightwingNutjob • Score: 3, Informative Thread

Perhaps even more embarrassing than the press kit (https://www.blueorigin.com/missions/ng-3) having one orbital inclination in the text and completely different one in the map below it.

How could they F this up

By backslashdot • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

The whole BS Blue Origin has been peddling is that they’re taking longer to do things because they do more thorough checks than SpaceX.

What goes up

By kackle • Score: 3 Thread

Blue Origin Rocket Launches, Successfully Reuses Booster - But Loses Satellite

“You had one job…”

Voyager 1 is Running Out of Power. NASA Just Switched Part of It Off

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot
After 49 years of space travel, Voyager 1 “is running out of power,” reports NPR:
The spacecraft runs on a radioisotope thermoelectric generator — a device that converts heat from decaying plutonium into electricity. It carries no solar panels, no rechargeable batteries. Just the slow, steady release of nuclear warmth, which diminishes by about 4 watts each year. After nearly five decades, that decline has become critical.

During a routine maneuver in late February, Voyager 1’s power levels fell unexpectedly, bringing the probe dangerously close to triggering an automatic fault-protection shutdown — a self-preservation response that would have forced engineers into a lengthy and risky recovery process. The team needed to act first. On April 17, mission engineers sent a sequence of commands to deactivate the Low-energy Charged Particles experiment, known as the LECP, which is one of Voyager 1’s remaining science instruments. The LECP has measured ions, electrons, and cosmic rays originating from both our solar system and the galaxy beyond it, helping scientists map the structure of interstellar space in a way no other instrument could…

Voyager 1 now carries two operational science instruments: one that listens for plasma waves, and one that measures magnetic fields. Engineers believe the latest shutdown could buy the mission roughly another year of breathing room. The team is also developing a more sweeping power conservation plan they informally call “the Big Bang” — a coordinated swap of several powered components all at once, trading older systems for lower-power alternatives. If testing on Voyager 2, planned for May and June 2026, goes well, the same procedure will be attempted on Voyager 1 no sooner than July. If it works, there is even a slim chance the LECP could once more continue to work.

The engineers say they hope to keep at least one instrument operating on each spacecraft into the 2030s. It would leave both still reporting from places no machine has ever gone before.111
Voyager 1 is now 15 billion miles from Earth, the article points out. (Radio signals take 23 hours to arrive…)

Thanks to long-time Slashdot reader fahrbot-bot for sharing the article.

Shout out

By ArchieBunker • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Thanks to all the engineers and scientists who keep this probe functioning. Keep up the amazing work.

Built to Last

By HoleShot • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

It is amazing Voyager has run this long. This isn’t that classic chevy sitting in your garage. This far away solar panels probably would not be worth much.
If anything maybe a bit more plutonium would be helpful. I am sure this mission was never figured it would last this long.

Re:Terrible

By Anonymous Coward • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Assuming you’re serious, at those distances there isn’t enough solar light energy to do any good.

It was designed for a 5 year lifetime. Obviously it was well designed with large margins. Ahh the good old days.

Breathtaking!

By jenningsthecat • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Fifty years in space and not only is it not dead, it’s still sending back useful data decades after its expected demise. Great engineering, teamwork, and a commitment that’s still alive five decades after launch. That’s both touching and inspirational.

Given that our species can make Voyager happen - along with all the other exploring, discovering, and building we’ve done since the advent of civilization - I find it truly sad that we may be on the verge of ending it all forever.

I get that violent aggression and subjugation were evolutionarily selected as survival traits. But it’s both sad and ironic that those traits may also spell the end of mankind. Wouldn’t it be sad if some of the things we’ve launched into the great unknown are still sending data back to us when there’s nobody left alive to receive it?

Re:Incredible achievments

By Ecuador • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

What are you talking about, we are not even maxing out newtonian physics by spending all money on wars instead of exploring the solar system and you are asking for theoretical physics? There won’t be a theory that will discover “magic” so we can make things appear without spending resources developing them. We don’t even spend significant money to develop viable fusion which is a surefire way to solve most of our energy problems, again that’s physics well established for decades.