Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Sam Bankman-Fried Loses Bid To Overturn Crypto Fraud Conviction
  2. Infineon to Open German Chip Fab as Part of EU Sovereignty Push
  3. SpaceX IPO Makes Elon Musk World’s First Trillionaire
  4. Pokemon Go Data Was Used To Help Train AI Systems Being Developed For Military Drones
  5. An Algorithm Determines How Fast You Should Drive On California’s I-15 Freeway
  6. China Lures Foreign Patients With Cutting-Edge, Cheap Medical Care
  7. Study Links Smartphones With Declining Fertility Rates
  8. Poland To Jail Online Streamers of Violent Crime For Up To 5 Years
  9. Coinbase Launches Tool To Let AI Agents Manage Trading and Payments
  10. Euro-Office 1.0 Arrives To Open-Source Infighting: ‘Compatibility Is Not Sovereignty’
  11. ACLU Sues After Facial Recognition Falsely Identifies Florida Man As a Child Abductor
  12. OpenAI Mulls Slashing Prices As It Competes With Anthropic For Users
  13. Opendoor Ends India Operations, Fueling a Bigger Conversation About AI and Outsourcing
  14. Xbox CEO Says Current Margins ‘Cannot Continue’
  15. OpenAI Says China Launched Influence Campaign To Shape US Attitudes On AI Datacenters

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Sam Bankman-Fried Loses Bid To Overturn Crypto Fraud Conviction

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Sam Bankman-Fried lost his appeal to overturn his FTX fraud conviction and 25-year sentence. Reuters reports:
In a unanimous decision, a three-judge panel of the Manhattan-based 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said prosecutors’ evidence against Bankman-Fried “was, conservatively stated, robust.” “While he was publicly reassuring customers, investors and regulators that FTX customer funds were safe, he was simultaneously using FTX as his own personal piggy bank, spending customer funds on real estate, political contributions, and investments,” Circuit Judge Barrington Parker wrote on behalf of the panel.

Bankman-Fried’s lawyers did not immediately respond to a request for comment. They may next ask all the active judges on the 2nd Circuit to hear the case, or ask the U.S. Supreme Court to take up the case. Bankman-Fried is also seeking a pardon from President Donald Trump, according to the Justice Department’s Office of the Pardon Attorney.
Bankman-Fried was sentenced to 25 years in prison in 2024 for “masterminding one of the largest financial frauds in American history,” wrote US District Judge Lewis Kaplan. He was convicted on all charges, including wire fraud, conspiracy to commit securities fraud, commodities fraud, and money laundering.

Infineon to Open German Chip Fab as Part of EU Sovereignty Push

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Infineon is set to open a $5.8 billion power-chip fab in Dresden on July 2, backed by about $1.1 billion in EU Chips Act subsidies. The plant will make power semiconductors for AI data centers and could eventually add up to $5.8 billion in annual revenue as demand for AI infrastructure strains global electricity systems. Bloomberg reports:
Infineon, traditionally a chipmaker for the automotive industry, has increasingly benefited from soaring demand for power chips used in AI data centers, which will be produced at the new facility. “The AI data centers currently being built and planned around the world will consume twice as much electricity in 2030 as they do today,” [said Chief Operating Officer Alexander Gorski]. “That’s as much as the entire Federal Republic of Germany.”

Chip production at the Dresden fab will be scaled over time depending on demand, potentially adding as much as 5 billion euros in revenue per year, Gorski said, declining to comment on when full capacity will be reached. The company has invested around 2 billion euros on construction and the remaining amount will be spent over time to add more machines to the fab, he added.

The new facility is “a key catalyst,” Bank of America analysts including Didier Scemama wrote in a note last week. Demand from Al customers is materially above Infineon’s current capacity, they said, adding the imbalance could improve in the 2027 and 2028 financial years. The analysts raised their Al power revenue forecast for the company by 500 million euros to 4.5 billion euros for 2028.

Infineon expects data center-related revenue to rise from around 1.5 billion euros in fiscal 2026 — roughly 10% of sales — to 2.5 billion euros in 2027, it said last month. The hundreds of billions of dollars being invested in AI are driving the rapid expansion of data center capabilities around the world. Infineon doesn’t produce advanced AI chips, like those designed by Nvidia. But the power semiconductors it plans to produce in Dresden are still needed for AI infrastructure.

SpaceX IPO Makes Elon Musk World’s First Trillionaire

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Reuters:
Few business leaders have been as deeply embedded in popular culture as Elon Musk, the ambitious entrepreneur who has become a central figure in internet culture and amassed a fortune that has made him the world’s first trillionaire. At a time when concerns about inequality are high and public attitudes toward the ultra-wealthy have soured, Musk has managed to retain a loyal following despite his stratospheric net worth and without the folksy persona that endeared other tycoons such as Warren Buffett to the masses.

While admirers view Musk’s no-filter style as part of his appeal, critics have accused him of wielding oligarch-like power, raised concerns about governance at his companies and objected to his increasingly partisan political interventions. Still, SpaceX, the sprawling rocket, satellite and AI company that together with electric-car maker Tesla form the center of Musk’s empire, raised a record $75 billion in its initial public offering on Thursday, highlighting investor enthusiasm for his business ventures. Prior to the share sale, Forbes pegged his net worth at roughly $780 billion, far ahead of the man next in line, Alphabet co-founder Larry Page.

“The second richest person has been hovering around $300 billion, so about less than one-third of what Musk can potentially be worth tomorrow,” said Matt Durot, deputy editor at Forbes Wealth. “And only one other person, (Oracle founder) Larry Ellison, has ever been worth $400 billion.” Most of Musk’s wealth now rests with SpaceX, where he holds a stake worth roughly $866 billion. Along with Tesla and the rest of his properties, his net worth will exceed $1.1 trillion when the stock begins trading Friday, according to Forbes and Reuters calculations based on company filings.

Congrats to Mr. Musk

By Valgrus Thunderaxe • Score: 5, Funny Thread
You’re a role model for everyone.

Sickening

By RitchCraft • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

While I’m all for the American dream there needs to be a hard limit on how much money a single person is allowed to accumulate. It’s madness.

Re:Congrats to Mr. Musk

By Whateverthisis • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
He doesn’t have that kind of money. He is a trillionaire in value, but not a trillionaire in cash. He has to maintain ownership in his stock position to maintain control of the companies. He can borrow against those shares; that is famously how Steve Jobs financed his life with his $1 salary at Apple, but none of the banks will support him until the stock settles at it’s price, and most of hte independent analysts say that SpaceX is at best worth $65/share, not $135.

Queue the jealousy and entitlement

By FeelGood314 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Musk has risked almost every penny he has on multiple occasions. He has created, commercialized or drastically improved four things (five if you count the boring company). The 1T of his wealth benefits society in the products we all consume, the environmental gains (he was the first to mass produce electric cars profitably), the jobs he has created and the taxes paid by him, his companies and his workers. Do you see any socialists doing any of these things? This is one capitalistic person. He’s done more for the environment than any green party. He’s created more wealth and better jobs than all communists combined.

Oh but one person shouldn’t have that much power. We need socialists to own the capital and make decisions. Think about how incompetent your local government is at doing, well everything. My city takes 12 years to open a dog park in an open field, $16000 to put in a speed bump, $80 per injection at their safe injection site and $40,000 per bike in their ride share program. I’m sure that’s about average for any socialists.

Re:Queue the jealousy and entitlement

By FeelGood314 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
I care that capital is well used. I don’t care if it is a government, an AI, a committee or a single person who makes the decisions on how to allocate capital. Musk has demonstrated that he is better than anyone else in the world at using capital. If he becomes a 10 Trillionaire then that would be good for society as a whole. Musk doesn’t eat more calories than me, he doesn’t have 1000x as many homes as me. His personal consumption is comparable to the average person. His wealth benefits society at large a million times more than it does him. Him being worth 100x more than what he is worth today would be a gain to society.

Imagine if we blocked him being worth more than 100 million, we wouldn’t have ecommerce between strangers - Paypal reduced the stranger fraud problem to a level low enough for paypal to insure transactions. If we set the limit to 1B then Tesla would have gone bankrupt and SpaceX wouldn’t exist. Starlink wouldn’t exist. The boring company wouldn’t exist. And what would we have traded this for? What would society have gotten in return? Some people would feel better?

Pokemon Go Data Was Used To Help Train AI Systems Being Developed For Military Drones

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Pokemon Go players’ optional location scans reportedly helped train Niantic Spatial’s visual positioning system, which uses camera imagery and 3D maps to navigate when GPS is unavailable or jammed. According to DroneXL, that technology is now being paired with Vantor’s drone navigation software for military and intelligence use, raising questions about whether gamers understood that footage collected for in-game rewards could eventually support defense systems. From the report:
The pipeline runs from a mobile game to the battlefield in three steps. Players scanned the physical world. Niantic Spatial turned those scans into a 3D map that lets a machine locate itself by sight when satellite signals fail. And in December 2025, Niantic Spatial announced a partnership with Vantor, the defense and intelligence firm formerly known as Maxar Intelligence, to fuse that ground-level system with Vantor’s aerial navigation software for use in GPS-denied operations.

I have spent years covering how drones lose their way the moment an electronic warfare unit switches on a jammer, a problem that has spread from the battlefield into civilian airspace, from Ukrainian workshops cycling through navigation generations to American programs scrambling for alternatives. The unsettling part of this story is not the technology. It is where the training data came from, and whether the people who supplied it would have agreed had anyone explained the destination.
“Now as part of Scopely (the Saudi-owned company that acquired Niantic last year for $3.5 billion), Pokemon GO data is not shared with Niantic Spatial,” a company spokesperson said in a statement to Kotaku. “AR Scans collected through Pokemon GO were submitted voluntarily by players who opted into the feature and were subject to the applicable Terms of Service and Privacy Policy at the time. The discontinuation of AR scanning and the end of data sharing with Niantic Spatial were part of the transition planning associated with Pokemon GO’s move to Scopely.”

Terrain following navigation tech predates GPS

By drnb • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
Using the Pokemon data is a pretty interesting repurposing of the data. However terrain following navigation technology has been around longer than GPS, Developed in the 1950s/60s, operational in the 1970s. The uniqueness here is a new way to generate a 3D terrain map.

Quite clever, really.

By devslash0 • Score: 3 Thread

- “I’m sorry, general, we have no visibility into this particular area.”
- “Just put a rare Pokémon in there and let the public do the rest.”

Back in the global Pokemon Go craze …

By Qbertino • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

… Moscow was clogged with Pokemon Go players, just like any other big city on the planet back in the summer of 2016. It was insane. Gorky Park, Victory Park, Arbat clogged with young people running around with their phones, collecting their Pokemons. I was surprised seeing the same crazy stuff going on just like in my homestates capital of Duesseldorf.

That such data is enough to program homing drones with ultra high precision is of no surprise. The sheer amount of data is enough to get all the accuracy you need.

Re:Terrain following navigation tech predates GPS

By drinkypoo • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Using the Pokemon data is a pretty interesting repurposing of the data.

It’s literally not repurposing. They always intended the game to deliver high resolution imagery coupled with positioning information that could be used for non-game purposes.

An Algorithm Determines How Fast You Should Drive On California’s I-15 Freeway

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Riverside County has launched an 8-mile “smart freeway” pilot on northbound I-15 near Temecula, using roadway sensors and an algorithm to coordinate ramp meters and suggest speeds rather than widening the freeway. Officials say the $33 million project could reduce stop-and-go traffic and travel times. According to SFGATE, similar systems in Australia and Denver reportedly cutting delays by 20% to 65%. From the report:
Unlike typical on-ramp stoplights that run on a timer lasting a few seconds, Interstate 15 drivers could find themselves waiting up to four minutes or even longer while the system determines the necessary speed for traffic entering the freeway. By spacing out the cars, transportation officials hope to improve traffic flow, reduce stop-and-go traffic and decrease the amount of time that travelers have to spend on the freeway.

The transportation commission spent $33 million to build the project, which will run for two years. Riverside County Transportation Commission spokesperson David Knudsen told SFGATE that if the program is successful, the agency will work with Caltrans to deploy it elsewhere in the county and then potentially to other traffic choke points in California. “This system is a lot less expensive than trying to build new lanes, and so the idea here is let’s make the system that we have work better,” he said.

Knudsen said the program is not managed by artificial intelligence but instead uses advanced sensors in the roadway to monitor real-time traffic conditions and make adjustments. The stretch of freeway that connects Temecula at the Riverside/San Diego County line to the Interstate 215 interchange in Murrieta can be notoriously clogged. What can be less than a 10-minute drive with no traffic can take between 25 and 45 minutes during the afternoon peak period, according to the transportation commission. “The intent is to create a consistent flow of traffic on the freeway system, and the coordinated ramp metering among the three on-ramps … will help do that,” Knudsen said. “If we can manage that, then we can help prevent that stop-and-go traffic frustration that so many people feel … on the freeway.”

Probably not as useful.

By getuid() • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Some states in Europe, e.g. Germany, have been doing similar things for decades.

It does improve flow, ultimately difficult to say by how much. But it’s not magic. Probably coupled with a ruthless and stupidly expensive camera based speeding system (i.e. $100 for every 1 mph above the designated flow speed) might work, but otherwise the bottleneck will be slight speeding. It will return laminar flow to oscillatory flow (break & accelerate), then to stop & go pretty soon.

A full highway is a full highway, there’s little in the way of magic or capacity to remedy that.

Uhm?

By MachineShedFred • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

If you have cars waiting for minutes to be able to enter the freeway, doesn’t that just mean gridlock at the top of the ramp from a shitload of people trying to get on the freeway?

Are they only implementing this where there are massive multi-lane queue ramps that can handle that kind of queue depth? I’m not familiar enough with the California section of I-15, I don’t think I’ve driven on that in 15 years.

Re:Probably not as useful.

By Zocalo • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
This. The problem isn’t the technology; that can demonstrably be shown to work in models and simulations because of things like - as you say - needing less space between vehicles, and also more complex things like reducing capillary action in the overall traffic flow (the stop-start effect you often get in heavy traffic). The reason why you don’t see those benefits is the growing number of entitled drivers who ignore the signage in the hope of gaming the system for personal gain (e.g. shorter travel time), so you do need robust enforcement with stricter tolerances and more punitive fines to try and deter that.

It’s the classic Prisoner’s Dilemma. The best solution for the greater good is to obey the signage, but the best solution for the individual is almost always to look out for Number One. Smart traffic flow systems do still seem to improve things, despite entitled drivers, although that’s probably more down to the enforcement measures keeping those bending the rules from bending them as far as they’d like to.

Re:Congesting pricing

By jonwil • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Congestion pricing is only an option in places that have good alternatives to driving, something that a freeway in California does not have.

The problem is arseholes.

By mjwx • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

This. The problem isn’t the technology; that can demonstrably be shown to work in models and simulations because of things like - as you say - needing less space between vehicles, and also more complex things like reducing capillary action in the overall traffic flow (the stop-start effect you often get in heavy traffic). The reason why you don’t see those benefits is the growing number of entitled drivers who ignore the signage in the hope of gaming the system for personal gain (e.g. shorter travel time), so you do need robust enforcement with stricter tolerances and more punitive fines to try and deter that.

It’s the classic Prisoner’s Dilemma. The best solution for the greater good is to obey the signage, but the best solution for the individual is almost always to look out for Number One. Smart traffic flow systems do still seem to improve things, despite entitled drivers, although that’s probably more down to the enforcement measures keeping those bending the rules from bending them as far as they’d like to.

Algorithms also assume that people know what they’re doing and will act rationally. If anyone thinks people drive this way they are clearly not paying attention to the roads.

Every traffic jam starts with just one arsehole, just one who thinks they’re different, special, above it all. One arsehole who decides that 30 is fast enough for everyone. One arsehole who sits on the phone, One arsehole who cuts people up, straddles two lanes, doesn’t proceed at a green light. One arsehole who thinks the rules don’t apply to him (and only him) and refuses to fit into traffic.

The kicker is, there are a lot more than just one arsehole on the roads.

And don’t think that autonomous cars will save us, first off, they’ll never work in our lifetimes but ignoring that they will be programmed to follow the rules to the letter (not the least important reason is to ensure the manufacture is as indemnified as possible from any blame), they will wait for a large enough gap, they will ignore faster moving lanes, they will wait for intersections to be clear, they won’t speed… So the arsehole will decide that they know how to drive better because they will force their way into traffic, tailgate, so on and so forth.

China Lures Foreign Patients With Cutting-Edge, Cheap Medical Care

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Bloomberg:
While traditional hotspots in the region such as Thailand, South Korea and Malaysia focus on services such as cosmetic surgery, IVF or physicals, China is trying to differentiate itself by providing some of the world’s most advanced procedures. “There are two reasons why a patient travels for medical treatments: availability of advanced treatments and price,” said Victor Cao, operations director of Joyful Medical, an agency in Shanghai that connects international patients to advanced cancer therapies in China. “Chinese people used to travel overseas for treatments that were not available at home, but now tables have turned.”

As expanding visa-free policies eased travel in the past year or so, videos are proliferating on social media of foreigners recounting their positive experiences of treatment in China, usually for consumer procedures like acupuncture and tooth scaling. But one treatment that’s more quietly gaining traction is CAR-T, among the most promising breakthroughs in oncology but unavailable in most countries, or extremely costly. The process sees doctors collect T cells from the patient’s blood then modify them in a lab to produce a special receptor, CAR, that can bind to a specific protein on cancer cells. These engineered cells are then multiplied into large numbers and infused back into the patient. The CAR-T cells seek out cancer cells carrying the target antigen and kill them. In the US, one single infusion can cost between $300,000 to $475,000, according to the American Cancer Society. In China, the equivalent costs about $150,000 to $180,000, and it could get even cheaper — its drug regulator recently accepted a marketing application for a therapy aimed to be priced below 300,000 yuan ($44,000).

China’s medical tourism market remains in its infancy. Lecheng International Medical Tourism Pilot Zone in Hainan, which was designated as the country’s only special medical zone in 2013, treated just a few thousand foreign medical tourists last year, compared to hundreds of thousands of domestic patients who visited. There, patients can access advanced drugs, devices, and therapies approved in other countries but not elsewhere in mainland China. But China is pushing to upgrade its economy and reshape its global image from just a manufacturing hub into a provider of high-value services, and demand for medical tourism is surging. Globally, the market is estimated at around $34 billion and expected to reach $126 billion by 2035, according to San Francisco-based Grand View Research. Meanwhile, China’s sector is projected to grow from $1.3 billion in 2025 to $3.4 billion by 2035, according to New York-based firm Market Research Future.
“The patients chose China for something they can’t get at home,” said Shi Haoying, the group’s founder and chief executive officer. “I think the growing attention to medical tourism to China is the inevitable result of long-term accumulation and development in many areas, such as growing medical technologies, quality of service and cost-effectiveness.”
Jeroen Groenewegen-Lau, an analyst at the Mercator Institute for China Studies, added: “Many new treatments, including in very advanced areas, are made in China but too advanced for the state of its healthcare system and the ability of its patients to pay for these things. It’s in China’s interest to integrate into the international system.”

Those dirty bastards!

By T34L • Score: 5, Funny Thread

I can’t believe they’re just “luring people” into their country with such dastardly underhanded tactics such as *checks notes* rapidly improving standard of living and societal progress! This isn’t a fair fight! I was told we are to exclusively compete via cultish nationalism and information manipulation!

AI, Automation, and the future

By kalieaire • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
The reason this treatment development is so cheap is that in China, the biotech firm mentioned in this article, they’re able to automate most of the process of the CAR-T therapy manufacturing to as little as one day.  The big cost though is the in-patient part of the treatment.

The process, assuming CAR-T is possible as a treatment, the patient gets their blood collected and the CAR-T cell therapy is manufactured, then they undergo Lymphodepletion Chemo, basically working to destroy your immune system for 3-4 days, then the CAR-T cell infusion happens followed by observation for 3-4 weeks.

During that time, the patient will experience really bad fevers and susceptible to infection and other complications that really really really suck, you have no energy and you feel like you’re dying.  You can’t even see your friends and family, everything has to be wiped down, and trained medical staff can only be around you.  Anyone that’s done a bone marrow transplant for Leukemia, or similar, will know how this treatment works.  My friend had to go through it twice because his first transplant ended in rejection.  Fortunately the second one worked and he’s been cancer free for almost 10 years now.

Then you’re there for another 2-4 weeks locally just in case any complications occur like rejection, delayed hyper inflammatory reactions, neurotoxicity syndrome.

With highly targeted cell therapies, AI and manual automation save a lot of time and labor for that specific process, but there’s no decoupling the true pain someone will experience going through this therapy.  Though the cool thing is that bone marrow treatments are also getting an upgrade, they’re moving towards “Universal Donor Cells” or “Allogenic CAR-T” and Autologous Stem Cell Gene Editing.  Instead of trying in futility to find the “Perfect Match” 8 out 8 HLA markers, in the future tha’tll be a thing of the past.  In fact, you might even develop a bone marrow transplant that’s even the same blood type that you had before radiation and chemo to zap your immune system.

The future is bright, but the path is still gonna hurt.

What does that infusion cost in europe?

By Dirk Becher • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Using the U.S. as reference for med prices is rather suboptimal.

Re:China respects veterans too

By Gilmoure • Score: 4, Informative Thread

When I was in training to be a medic (late 1980s) at a USAF hospital that also treated veterans, I asked a doc what he thought of socialized medicine.

“Look around you. That’s what this is.”

Re:Hilarious

By Phact • Score: 4, Funny Thread

Hi Doctor Nick!

Study Links Smartphones With Declining Fertility Rates

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Two recent studies argue that smartphones may have contributed to falling birthrates by reducing in-person social interaction, sexual frequency, and other conditions tied to unintended pregnancies. “One of the studies published in May is called 'The Collapse of Teen Fertility in the Digital Era' and the other, published just Monday, is titled 'Is the iPhone Birth Control? Causal Evidence from AT&T’s 2007-2011 Carrier Monopoly,’" reports KTLA. “Both were chronicled in a New York Times piece by political writer Sabrina Tavernise on Monday.” Slashdot reader sabbede submitted the story. From the report:
The one from May, authored by two University of Cincinnati professors, posits that teen fertility “collapsed globally” starting around 2007 — the same year the first iPhone was released. “Smart phones changed how teens spend time with each other … this change in turn drove the collapse in teen fertility,” the study’s abstract reads. “Once enough teens are on the phone, being on the phone is where the peer network is; in-person time falls sharply, and with it the unstructured contact in which most unintended teen conceptions occur.” The study claimed that countries “across the income and policy spectrum” were affected by the teen fertility drop, and that researchers used data from multiple countries, including the U.S., England and Wales, to rule out “country-specific contraceptive access and welfare reform stories.” “This model predicts that the shift towards the phone-mediated equilibrium affects multiple aspects of teen behavior,” the abstract continues, concluding that “the same instrument that produces a collapse in teen fertility produces a surge in teen suicides.”

The study published on Monday looks more closely at the United States, explaining that nationwide general fertility rates have fallen 22% since 2007. "[This is] a sustained decline not readily explained by economic conditions, contraceptive use, housing or childcare costs, or other commonly cited factors,” the National Bureau of Economic Researchers study states. “We assess the potential role of a different shock: the diffusion of the smartphone.” As mentioned before, the first iPhone was rolled out in 2007, and this study makes use of that timeframe as “a natural experiment” by using data from 2007 through 2011, when iPhones were only sold on AT&T. “From June 2007 through February 2011, the device was sold only on AT&T, allowing us to identify its effect from variation in AT&T’s mobile broadband coverage,” the study says. “Entropy-balanced Poisson and synthetic difference-in-differences event studies imply that access to the iPhone reduced births by 4.5-8.0% at ages 15-19 and 3.2-6.6% at ages 20-24, with statistically significant but smaller declines among older cohorts. Placebo analyses applied to Verizon and Sprint’s pre-2011 coverage footprint are null.

Taken together, these cohort effects imply that the diffusion of the iPhone deepened the decline in births among women under 30 while suppressing the rise in births among older women.” “Overall, the diffusion of the iPhone explains 33-52% of the decline in the general fertility rate among women aged 15-44,” researchers continued. “National-survey evidence on time use and sexual behavior is consistent with the iPhone reducing in-person interactions, increasing pornography use and reducing sexual frequency.”

Ban smartphones in school…

By Local ID10T • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Bring back unwanted teen pregnancies!

Why is slashdot posting these garbage articles?

By jgainey • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
This is a garbage framing of the issue. The article takes a real demographic fact — birth rates have been falling — and gives the most headline-friendly tech explanation: smartphones. But that is a weak causal story compared with the much more direct variables everyone is living through: housing costs, wage stagnation, student debt, childcare costs, healthcare costs, delayed household formation, and wealth being increasingly captured by the top of the economy. Yes, smartphones may be associated with reduced in-person socializing or changed dating behavior. But that does not make them the root cause. They could just as easily be a proxy for urbanization, class, education, income, broadband access, cultural change, or other regional differences. AT&T iPhone coverage from 2007–2011 is clever as a study design, but it is still not magic. Coverage maps are not randomly assigned social experiments. The more plausible causal chain is simpler: wealth concentrates -> assets inflate -> housing and adulthood become unaffordable -> people delay marriage/children -> fertility falls Blaming the phone is convenient because it turns a structural economic problem into a consumer-behavior story. It lets everyone avoid the harder conclusion: people are not having fewer kids because Steve Jobs invented the iPhone. They are having fewer kids because stable adult life has become too expensive and too insecure.

Re:Ban smartphones in school…

By Tony Isaac • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Every technology has a dark side, to be sure. Reducing teen pregnancy is not one of them.

Re: Ban smartphones in school…

By OrangeTide • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Our economic system does not cope with population decline. So something has to give, and I don’t think given how we treat women or screw over the younger generation that they’re going to start raising extra children.

Re:Headlines

By drinkypoo • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Women do not want children in more numbers than ever because they are not marrying, because they follow each other on instagram and other mass hysteria sites where they promote hedonistic living to each other

GP comment explains the why, you’re explaining the what, we already know what the what is. And some of us know what the why is, but not you. Therefore you’re stupid and your comment is stupid.

So women as a voting block created the environment of high taxation and subsidization

Just absolute clown shit.

Poland To Jail Online Streamers of Violent Crime For Up To 5 Years

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Polish lawmakers have voted to criminalize “trash streaming,” with up to five years in prison for online broadcasts of serious crimes such as rape or murder, animal cruelty, humiliating violence, gambling promotion, or even simulated depictions of those acts. Reuters reports:
The move is part of a broader push by Poland to tighten regulation of online content. Recent measures include banning the use of mobile phones by children under 16 in schools and introducing stricter age verification rules to access pornography. Under the new provisions, broadcasting crimes punishable by more than five years in prison, including murder or rape, will itself be classed as a separate offence punishable by up to five years behind bars.

The law also covers content showing cruelty to animals, violence aimed at humiliating others, and the promotion of gambling. The same penalties will apply to individuals who simulate or falsely portray the commission of such crimes while streaming, lawmakers said.

Highly abusable

By rsilvergun • Score: 3, Insightful Thread
So a police officer beats the shit out of somebody right? You put that on the internet and now you’ve got 5 years in prison for it.

Seriously is anyone dumb enough that they don’t see right through shit like this? There is already bound to be existing obscenity law that can be used against this kind of content. But those laws usually have a much higher bar to prove.

It’s amazing how easy it was to get everybody to give up their rights and privacy and freedom. It took a while but the problem is the people working on this, the fascists, are always backed by huge amounts of cash. Most of their backers are going to end up dead in purges but when you’ve got that much money it gives you a big head and you think you’re one of the movers and shakers right up until somebody like Putin stabs you with a umbrella or put something in your tea…

As for the rest of us anyone reading this is smart enough to know this is bad news but there’s plenty of people who think they are in the in group and that they’re going to get to be the ones wearing the boots when it comes time to stomp necks. They’re not but if you’re dumb enough to think it’s fun to stop people’s necks you’re dumb enough to think you’re going to be the one doing The stomping

Re:Highly abusable

By machineghost • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

TFA says nothing whatsoever about that. What it says is:

Under the new provisions, broadcasting crimes punishable by more than five years in prison, including murder or rape, will itself be classed as a separate offence punishable by up to five years behind bars.

The law also covers content showing cruelty to animals, violence aimed at humiliating others, and the promotion of gambling.

The same penalties will apply to individuals who simulate or falsely portray the commission of such crimes while streaming, lawmakers said.

So again, nothing about not posting cop abuse videos. If you have some other information beyond the article, share it … but otherwise, why are you wasting your life spreading FUD, over something you clearly know nothing about?

Clarity is Needed

By SmaryJerry • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Based on the article its impossible to discern whether the outlawed broadcasts are only those where you are involved in the situation, such as creating or enabling it, or whether this would also outlaw things like live news coverage or live streaming of events people stumble upon while walking down the road.

Re:Highly abusable

By jenningsthecat • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

TFA says nothing whatsoever about that. What it says is:

Under the new provisions, broadcasting crimes punishable by more than five years in prison, including murder or rape, will itself be classed as a separate offence punishable by up to five years behind bars.

So again, nothing about not posting cop abuse videos.

If what the cop is doing is a crime “punishable by more than five years in prison”, then posting a video of the cop committing said crime is also a crime under the new legislation - at least according to TFS: “Under the new provisions, broadcasting crimes punishable by more than five years in prison, including murder or rape, will itself be classed as a separate offence punishable by up to five years behind bars”.

NO, you are wrong

By A nonymous Coward • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

It’s a crime in the US to “shout fire in a movie theater”. Guess Americans live in Soviet times too.

NO. It is a crime to FALSELY shout fire in a theater. Huge difference.

Coinbase Launches Tool To Let AI Agents Manage Trading and Payments

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Coinbase has launched Coinbase for Agents, a tool that lets AI agents like ChatGPT or Claude execute crypto trades and manage payments on a user’s behalf. “For example, customers can prompt their agent to rebalance portfolios, identify trading opportunities, execute strategies and manage positions over time,” reports CNBC. “It will eventually expand these capabilities to stocks and predictions.” From the report:
[U]sing Coinbase’s machine-to-machine payments protocol, called x402, agents can pay directly for digital services like paywalled research, data APIs and on-demand compute without a human in the loop — and execute trades based on those insights. The company sees this stage of agentic payments, which lets customers bypass the need to manage traditional logins or subscriptions, as a precursor to agentic shopping, where agents browse, find the best deals, select and make purchases on users’ behalf.

[…] The whole idea is to give agents access to money and, through that financial independence, improve their set of capabilities to pretty much anything on the internet,” Lincoln Murr, Coinbase’s AI product lead, told CNBC. “In the 2010s, every internet company dealt with the transition from desktop and web into a mobile environment. And now in the late 2020s, we’re seeing the exact same thing happen where agents are going to be the new primary economic actors on the internet.”

The x402 protocol was created in May 2025 and has seen more than 100 million transactions since its debut, Murr said. There are about 157,000 agents acting as buyers using the protocol in the past 30 days, according to x402scan.com. “We saw immediate demand and interest in the ability for agents to pay for things autonomously and that was a huge waking up moment for us [on] the ability of agents to become these new primary financial actors across the internet,” he said.

Noice

By Bill, Shooter of Bul • Score: 3 Thread
So, ai agent places “prediction” that public figure A is dead, orders product from grocery store with hidden ingredient they are known to be allergic to and delivers to their house. This isn’t Asimov, we built the bots without the three rules.

terms and conditions?

By kencurry • Score: 3 Thread
Have to say if you are naive enough to do this you are probably not the type who reads the “terms and conditions” page anyways. Why does this bother me? Not my thing so I shouldn’t care at all. But still, I don’t want to see society go to complete shit quite yet.

Euro-Office 1.0 Arrives To Open-Source Infighting: ‘Compatibility Is Not Sovereignty’

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from ZDNet:
If digital sovereignty is important to you, and it certainly is in the European Union (EU), then you’ll be pleased to know that EuroOffice, a new open-source browser-based office suite alternative to Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace, has officially reached its first stable release. A coalition of EU-based companies, including Nextcloud, Ionos, and other Euro-Stack participants, is positioning Euro-Office as a cornerstone of European digital sovereignty. However, The Document Foundation (TDF), LibreOffice’s steward, accuses the project of reinforcing Microsoft’s document lock-in, which TDF argues isn’t friendly to open standards.

Setting aside the open-source politics for the moment, here’s what Euro-Office brings you. The release went live on June 9. It is, however, not a stand-alone office suite. As the software’s backers explain in a FAQ, “Euro-Office is more of an integration component. It merely handles document editing itself. Storage, as well as navigation, permissions, and sharing logic, have to be offered by a platform it is integrated in, like Proton Docs, Nextcloud Hub, or OpenProject.” So, while you can install Euro-Office on your own Linux server, you’ll need to integrate it yourself. If you’re not a Linux expert, however, don’t give up hope. Some companies have already released packaged, ready-to-install Euro-Office stacks, including Nextcloud Hub 26 Spring, Ionos’ Nextcloud Workspace, and Office.eu. These initial deployments are web-based rather than standalone desktop suites.

The goal, organizers say, is to give European organizations a way to host their office suite on EU infrastructure under EU law, while maintaining an experience familiar to Microsoft Office users. Specifically, Euro-Office is meant to be “a solution for editing documents, spreadsheets, and presentations, developed as a true sovereign community collaboration of over a dozen different organizations.”
TDF’s main objection is that Euro-Office’s decision to default to Microsoft’s OOXML format undercuts its claims of European digital sovereignty, since OOXML remains closely tied to Microsoft Office behavior and control. “Compatibility is not sovereignty,” TDF warned, saying a European-branded suite that saves files in OOXML by default “is de facto an ally of Microsoft in its content lock-in strategy.”

Nope

By Tailhook • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
https://office.eu/

Start in Minutes, Move at Your Pace
Step 1
Link your Microsoft or Google account.

LOL

Microsoft Office Open (OOXML) format

By Mirnotoriety • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
M$ office still doesn’t implement “OOXML” to specification (it’s impossible for anyone else but m$ anyway - for example it has stuff like; autoSpaceLikeWord95 which says to use word 95 spacing, but does not document the spacing rules).

The format m$ office uses is Microsoft Office XML (MOX), which is proprietary and is changed every time libreoffice goes and reverse engineers the latest sabotage (for example, libreoffice supports parsing XML-encoded C struct, which is needed to support the typical m$ development practice of dumping the memory of the data structure that encodes the data into the file).

“OOXML” is the result of m$ grabbing their internal documentation (that they don’t follow anyway), removing the important information and then dumping the remaining over 6000 pages and calling it a “standard” and then got ECMA to rubber stamp it as a “standard” (even though something impossible to implement even after following 6000 pages is not a standard and will never be).

M$ definitely didn’t corrupt the voting process by instructing their serfs to vote yes in exchange for “marketing contribution” and “extra support in the form av Microsoft resources”; reference

Re: Compatibility catch 22

By drinkypoo • Score: 5, Informative Thread

OOXML is a fake standard it’s impossible to fully implement.

Re:Nope

By dinfinity • Score: 5, Informative Thread

https://office.eu/ [office.eu]

Not the same thing.

https://github.com/Euro-Office is what this is about.

They are somewhat related, though:
“Euro-Office is open source and developed in public by a community of individuals and organizations. We welcome contributions from anyone, including individuals, companies, public organizations and non-profits. We encourage anyone who cares about free and open source, modern office technology to get involved! Our goal is to have as few barriers as possible to contribution.

Current contributors and supporters include:

        Abilian
        BTactic
        EuroStack
        IONOS
        Nextcloud
        Office.EU
        Open-Xchange
        OpenProject
        Proton
        Soverin
        Tuta
        XWiki”

Re:Compatibility catch 22

By Cley Faye • Score: 5, Informative Thread

There is an ISO standard, yes. Overly complex for the simplest things, but whatever.

Then there’s the actual de-facto reference implementation, which does not adhere strictly to that standard in the first place, meaning any other implementation that claims great compatibility with MS Office files will need to have “ISO standard” mode and “ISO standard but not really” mode.

Then there’s the occasional extension to the standard, using not-yet (sometimes never) standardized additions, developed behind closed doors, whose behavior varies slightly from one version to another. Any other “compliant” implementation will also have to support them, but this time, oops, no documentation, good luck.

And, supposedly, Microsoft tools do support OpenDocument. But, given the limited amount of resource Microsoft have, they can’t implement it very well, despite also being an ISO standard. Weirdly, it’s always open/free/small business that have to put in the work and the money to support the ever changing non-compliant formats pushed by Microsoft. I wonder why.

The point is, no matter how popular alternative gets, there will always be a boss somewhere that goes “I can’t open that document, fix that”, and the only direction this ever move, is toward “we must support Microsoft shenanigans”, never in the opposite direction. Then comes the EU, today, going “yep, let’s do our best to adhere to Microsoft dominance and keep empowering them in it”. I understand why some people are miffed by that.

I hear the “but I have to be able to read a document” argument, because it is true. But it is also true that playing catch-up with an openly hostile actor that have zero incentive to help anyone else in the race can only lead to losing said race.

ACLU Sues After Facial Recognition Falsely Identifies Florida Man As a Child Abductor

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
fjo3 shares a report from Reason:
Police arrested a man in Florida for attempted child abduction in a town he had never visited, and the only evidence linking him to the crime was an AI facial recognition hit. Represented by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), he is now suing the officers and agencies who put him through it. […] According to a police report, facial recognition software concluded with 93 percent confidence that the suspect was Robert Dillon. […]

The ACLU is now suing the city of Jacksonville Beach, as well as the individual police officers and officials involved in the case. According to the lawsuit (PDF), the responding officer viewed security camera footage of the suspect but didn’t take a copy; instead, he took pictures of the screen with his cell phone. “In the photos, the suspect image is low resolution, and the suspect’s face is partially shadowed and off-axis,” the lawsuit claims. When an investigator queried the facial recognition system, it was with the officer’s grainy secondhand cell phone photos. […]

But as the ACLU notes, facial recognition’s accuracy “depends significantly on the quality of the probe image. Lower-quality images contain less interpretable facial data, degrading the system’s ability to produce a reliable template.” At the very least, it requires a much better source image. Besides, no such investigative tool should form the sole basis for an arrest warrant. “If you came to me with a facial recognition hit and that was your probable cause, I would probably kick you out of my office because that’s not how it works,” Jacksonville Sheriff T.K. Waters told local news. (Waters is among those being sued in the ACLU lawsuit, because it was an investigator from the Jacksonville Sheriff’s Office who ran the grainy photo through facial recognition and advised O’Connell it was a “93% match” to Dillon.)

Nip this in the bud

By Pascoea • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
I hope this guy gets a good 7-8 figure settlement out of the people involved in this, and it leads other agencies to pause a bit before more people’s lives are upended by lazy police departments. These systems are infallible, people using them as such need to feel the pain.

If you’ve done nothing wrong…

By PackMan97 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
…you’ve got nothing to fear. I guess that doesn’t hold true any longer. Truth is it was never true.

Re:If you’ve done nothing wrong…

By Anonymous Coward • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

It was always just a sound bite from those who assumed themselves safe, blissfully unaware of Richelieu’s quote.

No one’s suing because of what the computer said, it’s perfectly fine to automate flagging for human followup.

It’s fucked up to automate execution. And if the human followup is just “the computer said” clowns you have not added a second stage.

Humans will always gravitate to the laziest available route so unless the followup is forcibly built in you have not added any judgement or evaluation or review. You have a reverse centaur.

Favorite part … hired him anyway

By laughingskeptic • Score: 5, Informative Thread
O’Connell is an officer with a documented history of volatility and poor judgment, having previously been terminated from the St. Johns County Sheriff’s Office for threatening to “blow up” the agency, later reinstated, then arrested for domestic battery before resigning under the weight of those charges. Jacksonville Beach PD hired him anyway, assigned him as lead investigator on a sensitive child luring case, and later promoted him to corporal after his investigation resulted in the wrongful arrest and prosecution of an innocent man.

Re:Nip this in the bud

By Pascoea • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
He was arrested, finger-printed, had a mug shot taken, probably had his name printed in newspapers, all associated with being accused of child abduction. Are YOU willing to have your name in the newspaper accusing you of abducting a pre-teen? The fact that you went out of your way to check the “post Anonymously” box tells us all we need to know. And the lady in the article I linked spent MONTHS in detention for a crime she had nothing to do with. How’s that sound to you?

So, I say this with a all the conviction I can muster: Fuck off, troll.

OpenAI Mulls Slashing Prices As It Competes With Anthropic For Users

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
OpenAI is reportedly considering sharp price cuts for paid access to its AI models as competition with Anthropic intensifies and both companies race for users ahead of potential IPOs. “The company is weighing significant cuts to what it charges for tokens, the unit of measurement artificial-intelligence firms use to bill for their products,” the Wall Street Journal said, adding that it was “in anticipation of similar cuts the company expects at Anthropic.” CNBC reports:
The ChatGPT producer, which did not immediately respond to CNBC’s requests for comment, currently charges consumers in tiered subscriptions of $8, $20 and $100 and above each month for access to its flagship GPT-5.5 models. Anthropic conversely charges users $17 each month with an annual subscription to Claude Pro, and $100 and above monthly for a subscription to Claude Max.
OpenAI confidentially filed for an IPO on Monday, just a week after Anthropic made its own filing.

Always Be Closing

By TwistedGreen • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Eventually it will be free and ad-supported, they just haven’t figured out how to fully monetize its userbase yet. The potential is huge since advertising will gladly pay to manipulate your behavior by subtly working suggestive product placements into every response.

By the way, I’m selling these fine leather jackets…

Truthfully…

By dbialac • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Truthfully, I’ve subscribed to it. I’m not sure that I’m going to renew again. It’s answers keep getting worse and worse as each new engine comes out. I spend way too much time either telling it not to spend so much time walking on eggshells or having to correct its errors.

Sovereign Systems

By broward • Score: 4, Informative Thread

I wrote this almost a year ago and was a bit surprised to see it pick up a couple of hits today… probably because I made a good prediction last July. ;)

https://www.scry.llc/2025/07/2…

Essentially. the Ai companies have overshot the commercial sweetspot for AI. You don’t hire a PhD to deliver mail or repair a leak. Existing open source, locally hosted models can do quite a bit of digital work right now, as is, at a predictable, fixed cost. Sovereign systems…

https://www.scry.llc/2026/04/0…

Kaboom!

By RitchCraft • Score: 3 Thread

It’s a race to the bottom! Hold on to your butts!

The economics have got to be atrocious

By Tschaine • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

“We’re losing money on every chat message, so we need to make up for it in volume!”

On the supply side: the largest allocation capital in human history is flowing into datacenter construction.

On the demand side: the two biggest providers are competing on price because they’re just taking turns at the tops of the capability leaderboards.

And they’re both losing money.

Opendoor Ends India Operations, Fueling a Bigger Conversation About AI and Outsourcing

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Opendoor is shutting down its India operations less than two years after opening offices there. Slashdot reader alternative_right shares a post from Opendoor CEO Kaz Nejatian: “I shared this note earlier today with the entire team at Opendoor. Today we began to say goodbye to our colleagues in India as we wind down our India operations. Our customers are in America, and that’s where our operational work belongs.” TechCrunch reports:
In announcing the decision on Wednesday, CEO Kaz Nejatian cited a push to bring operational work back to the U.S., where Opendoor’s customers are, and a shift toward smaller AI-native teams. The company did not respond to requests for comment on how many employees were affected or how much of the decision was driven by AI efficiency. But the announcement quickly gained traction across Silicon Valley, where founders, investors, and outsourcing experts see it as an early example of how AI is reshaping the economics that made India a global hub for back-office operations.

[…] Some investors viewed the decision as a sign of what AI could mean for India’s vast outsourcing workforce. “As manual work gets replaced by AI, a lot of jobs will be lost in India,” wrote Sheel Mohnot, co-founder of Better Tomorrow Ventures. Others viewed Opendoor as evidence of a larger shift in how companies are organized. Keshav Lohia, a venture capitalist at Emergent Ventures, described the decision as a “watershed moment” for AI-driven operations, arguing that advances in AI are beginning to challenge the cost-arbitrage model that made India a popular offshoring destination.

Phil Fersht, chief executive of HFS Research, an advisory firm that tracks the global outsourcing and business services industry, told TechCrunch that the development should not be viewed simply as jobs moving from India to the U.S. The more important shift, he said, is that AI is reducing the amount of operational labor companies require in the first place, allowing firms to run leaner organizations regardless of location. “This is not an isolated restructuring,” Fersht said. “It is part of a much broader pattern we are starting to see as companies redesign operations around AI, automation, and much leaner workflows.” Fersht argued that the winners would be companies that combine AI, software and human expertise to deliver outcomes without continually adding headcount, a model he described as “Services-as-Software.” While Opendoor may be one of the first high-profile examples, he said it is unlikely to be the last.

Some investors are already extrapolating beyond individual companies. Varun Rekhi, a venture capitalist at Speedinvest, argued that if AI reduces demand for labor-intensive services, it could eventually pressure one of India’s most important export industries, which is built around supplying talent and expertise to global corporations.

Doomed

By 0123456 • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

I bought a DGX Spark recently and set up Hermes and few local AI models. After buying the hardware it’s like having a team of Indian coders who’ll work 24/7 for a few cents an hour. Slow and somewhat buggy but I can tell it what to do at night and come back in the morning and it’s ready for me to review and test.

There’s simply going to be no market for low-end outsourced programming services soon.

Opendoor likely trained LLMs off Indian employees

By JoeyRox • Score: 3 Thread
Which means we’ve come full circle - Indians training their American replacements instead of the other way around.

Re:Opendoor

By Morromist • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

They’re basically a memestock whose value went up 1000% last year for no particular reason. Unlike many memestocks the value of the shares hasn’t decreased much since then, down only 50%. They are doing the usual “we’re going to transform this lazy business of real estate with innovation and tech including tolkenizing everything on the blockchain and completely take over and be the next amazon!”

Re:Opendoor likely trained LLMs off Indian employe

By MIPSPro • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Could be. However, I have been at two companies where folks were forced to train their replacements. It’s pretty horrible. You walk by someone’s desk who has 90 days left (max) with the company and is doing the “knowledge transfer” to keep their severance. In one case that was a month’s pay. In the other it was a week’s pay for every year you’d been with the company up to 10 weeks.

The people doing that were super depressed and demotivated. Some where super pissed, too. I was afraid every day someone was going to come in with a gun because a few were truly furious and loud (like the guy who had a kid with cancer and was being laid off and losing his health insurance). Some just did what they were asked and then left. Others tried a bit of sabotage like the guy who “accidentally lost” all their smartcards that were used to unlock the Brocade Encryption Switches and caused them to lose access to the data on about 12,000 LTO5 tapes. That guy was laughing when they were all panicked and moving his cube furniture around to try and see if they’d slid behind his desk (one had but they needed 3 out of 5 to unlock the encryption).

I ended up having to manage about eight of those Indian replacements. Two were pretty decent. The others were pretty useless. So, about the same ratio as most Americans. However, the offshoring firm was screwing those guys. They were paying them less than they’d agreed to (taking too much off the top) and failing to pay them at all sometimes and leaving them stranded or without any way to pay their rent. It was pretty hellacious for the Indian folks, too.

It was really a dark and ugly job. Then the whole company got bought by a major Indian offshoring firm and they absolutely nuked the Americans and laid off every last one of them. I was a principle so they were at least acting like they’d keep me but I quit and ran away while they hesitated to keep my salary high. Negotiating salary with no job sucks.

I have no problem with immigrants or Indians in general. However, I do have a problem with the H1B program that creates an underclass to drive down wages.

Xbox CEO Says Current Margins ‘Cannot Continue’

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Xbox CEO Asha Sharma and Chief Content Officer Matt Booty told staff that Xbox’s current economics “cannot continue,” citing more than $20 billion in spending over five years, declining revenue outside Activision Blizzard King, console supply constraints tied to RAMaggedon, and an overextended studio portfolio. The memo stops short of announcing layoffs, but a Bloomberg report says substantial Xbox cuts are expected after Microsoft’s fiscal year ends on June 30. Engadget reports:
The takeaways are pretty grim. For starters, the simple math of Xbox’s revenue isn’t adding up to success. “Excluding Activision Blizzard King, over the past five years, we have spent over $20 billion on ongoing investments in our content, platform, and hardware subsidy, but our annual revenue has declined nearly half a billion during that time,” the execs state. “Going forward, this cannot continue.” They also acknowledge the impact of RAMaggedon: “We are currently unable to make as many consoles as players want to buy, and we need a new business model and partnerships for hardware as we remain committed to Helix.” (Helix, in this case, is Project Helix, the codename for Xbox’s new console.)

Then there’s the kicker, a renewed admission that Xbox still can’t support the many studios it acquired in the late 2010s in an effort to grow its first-party game ambitions. “We have found ourselves over extended as we executed on changing strategies in a landscape of more readily available content,” the pair said, noting elsewhere that with so many good games, not to mention the plethora of other forms of entertainment available, “Going forward, our competition is attention.”

Translation

By RitchCraft • Score: 5, Funny Thread

We need to funnel more money into our AI, games be damned.

Re:Microsoft can’t sustain two platforms

By JustAnotherOldGuy • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Members of the PC Master Race concur.

Consoles seem unsustainable at this point and speaking of points, there doesn’t seem to be one for continued console development or ownership.

Yeah, you got a $900 box that can’t open a spreadsheet, run GIMP or Blender or multitask, and it can’t be modded much, but on the upside it’ll play COD at almost the speed of a decent gaming PC.

you don’t understand how MSFT works

By jizmonkey • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

The company-wide margin is a very important metric for investors and the stock price generally. When Amy Hood says to Asha, “you need to increase your margins” that means either you increase your business unit’s margins by whatever means necessary, or you’re out on the street looking for a new job.

There were three big problems at MSFT - first that they wildly overpaid for Activision, they paid $95 per share (peak was $104* from Covid) at a time when it was worth barely half that. There are companies that when acquired unlock more value (say a small company acquired by Oracle, now Oracle’s sales team can sell it — or it can be bundled into a bigger product) but Activision was not such a company — there was nothing MSFT could do that would generate more revenue or have less cost than Activision alone. If anything, the politics at Microsoft were inevitably going to drag down Activision’s performance. (I am really understating this last point but I don’t want to get bogged down here.)

Two, Gamepass. When Gamepass first came out, the third party publishers freaked because they predicted it would suck all the oxygen out of the room. Like, a gamer might have $100 a year to spend on games, and if it all gets spent on Gamepass then it’s not being spent on third-party games. That in turn means that Xbox is less appealing for publishers and for casual gamers — if you’re the kind of gamer who only plays one game like Animal Crossing, you don’t want to spend $100 a year on a Gamepass subscription and/or you probably want a game that now isn’t being made on Xbox, now Xbox isn’t the platform for you. I can tell you that MSFT was excited that Activision would turbocharge the Gamepass offering, because the Gamepass subscriptions had stalled below expectations — but common sense would tell you that there was no way this was going to work from a revenue standpoint. I.e., you can’t increase overall revenue by putting Call of Duty on Gamepass.

Third, the Series S. The Series S is far less capable than the Series X, and is the least powerful console in the market (after Switch 1), but it sells a lot more units than the Series X. Having to target the Series S makes the Xbox unappealing as a platform to target, on top of the fact that, as mentioned above, gamers won’t buy many copies of the game because all their money is going to Gamepass already. That’s coming off of the Xbox One which MSFT wildly mismarketed as a set-top box so MSFT was already starting from behind in the PS5/XSX generation.

* Yes yes I’m handwaving over debt but Activision didn’t have a lot of debt.

Re: Just give up on the console war

By jacks smirking reven • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Maybe but to me that’s the exact fight they are losing.

They don’t have the confluence of exclusive IP combined with unique hardware of Nintendo.
They will always lose the hardware market share and brand recognition of Playstation.
They won’t be able to build the user loyalty and market feature set of Steam.

Content is exactly what they do have; studios and game properties that all customers of those platforms want.

Re:Microsoft can’t sustain two platforms

By drinkypoo • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Yeah, you got a $900 box that can’t open a spreadsheet, run GIMP or Blender or multitask, and it can’t be modded much, but on the upside it’ll play COD at almost the speed of a decent gaming PC.

And the gaming industry created this problem, by not allowing you to do something useful with your console once it’s no longer useful as a console, by locking it down and never providing an unlock. Thousands of us hacked our Xboxes and used them as media centers, then Microsoft made this infeasible going forwards. Sony did the same with the PS3 and “Other OS.” Nintendo has just always been locked down AF, but we used to have some freedom with some of the game boys… so much for that.

I have zero reason to buy a console because it has zero value after it’s been a console for me.

OpenAI Says China Launched Influence Campaign To Shape US Attitudes On AI Datacenters

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Politico:
China was likely behind an online influence operation to sway U.S. perceptions of artificial intelligence technology and reshape the debate in Washington around the infrastructure needed to support it, according to research from OpenAI published Wednesday. OpenAI said it caught the influence campaign because China-backed operatives were using ChatGPT to create content for the social media campaign. […] OpenAI’s researchers identified two clusters of ChatGPT users “likely originating from China” who used the AI chatbot to generate social media content “in support of apparent covert influence operations” promoting certain narratives about AI. This includes claims that data center build-outs are raising electricity costs for the average American family and that President Donald Trump has weaponized tariffs to keep the U.S. ahead in the global tech race. These accounts have since been banned, the report said.

One cluster of users asked ChatGPT to generate images and comments pushing these narratives. These comments were then posted on social media by “batches of accounts” posing as Americans, [said Ben Nimmo, principal investigator of intelligence and investigations at OpenAI]. Another cluster identified by researchers used AI to generate social media content criticizing the Trump administration’s tariffs as an attempt to “dominate technological competition.” Prompts used for this campaign were submitted in Simplified Chinese and asked that AI-generated content not include Chinese President Xi Jinping and focus solely on Trump — a possible tell that China was behind the operation, according to the report. Nimmo said that the influence campaign amplified existing public backlash in the U.S. against the creation of new AI data centers, which has resulted in dozens of proposed moratoriums at the local, state and national level.
“Neither campaign appears to have gained much authentic engagement,” Nimmo said. “They’re important for what they reveal about the intentions of influence operators from China, and the narratives they’re testing and seeking to amplify, but not for the impact.”

Wait! What?

By PPH • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Are we switching from blaming Russia to blaming China now? I didn’t get the memo.

Of course, of course.

By fuzzyfuzzyfungus • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
I, for one, completely trust this objective and disinterested report from a company that has no stake in the ease of ramming datacenter approvals through.

Re:I’m tired boss

By jacks smirking reven • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

This is true but a little more nuanced. The polling definitely says R and D voters are about equally concerned over AI.

This perception though is driven by the fact that the biggest AI leaders and boosters and pretty lopsided in being in the conservative political tent. Musk, Zuckerberg, Altman, the “All In” guys, pretty much all of the crypto folks who transitioned over to AI, the loudest voices have thrown their lot in with the current admin. Some in full, some tentative but they’re all jockeying for favors from the would be Emperor. The Trump effect of making everything about culture war is everything in our lives has to become political and it’s exhausting.

The key point [Re:Yes, suuuure! It is ALL the…”]

By Geoffrey.landis • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The key sentence in the summary: "“Neither campaign appears to have gained much authentic engagement.”

So, the reason so many people hate AI data centers is not because of this AI influence campaign.

Re:B-b-b-but CHINA!!!

By fahrbot-bot • Score: 5, Funny Thread

China is going to win this one

Win what exactly?

Whatever Trump claims we’re winning?
Don’t worry though, I’m sure China will also “get tired of all the winning” - I know we are. /s

Trump in 2016:

We’re gonna win so much, you may even get tired of winning. And you’ll say, “Please, please. It’s too much winning. We can’t take it anymore, Mr. President, it’s too much.” And I’ll say, “No it isn’t. We have to keep winning. We have to win more!”