Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Users Cry Foul After AMD Stripped Memory Crypto From Its Consumer CPUs
  2. Trump’s ‘Made In the USA’ Phone Is Just a Reskinned HTC U24 Pro
  3. Britain Unveils Sweeping Ban On Social Media For Under-16s
  4. Fox Is Buying Roku For $22 Billion
  5. Google CEO Largely Avoids Discussing AI In Stanford Commencement Speech
  6. Swiss Voters Reject Proposal To Cap Population At 10 Million
  7. Are Many College Students Losing the Ability to Read?
  8. IT Workers Are Now Struggling to Find Work, as ‘Picky’ Companies Demand AI Skills
  9. US-Iran Peace Agreement Prompts Stock Rally, Leaves Some Investors Skeptical and Questions on Speed of Resuming Oil Production
  10. Workers Spend As Much Time ‘Botsitting’ AI As Producing Useful Work, Survey Finds
  11. Microsoft Updates Six Windows Apps. ‘Photos’ Gets Watermarks for Copilot Images (Off by Default)
  12. UK Scientists See Little Evidence for Claims Smartphones Are Rewiring Kids’ Brains
  13. As ‘Disclosure Day’ Premieres, Steven Spielberg Says He Believes Aliens Really Have Visited Earth
  14. Will Meta’s $14 Billion Bet on AI Ever Pay Off?
  15. Vintage AMD R600 Graphics Driver Sees Code Cleanups Thanks To GitHub Copilot

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Users Cry Foul After AMD Stripped Memory Crypto From Its Consumer CPUs

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica:
A decade ago, AMD added a protection to its high-end CPUs to protect them against cold boot attacks and other types of physical exploits that siphon sensitive data out of the connected memory chips. Short for Transparent Secure Memory Encryption, TSME encrypts the entire contents stored in memory, making the data useless to physical attackers. Over time, AMD added TSME to lower-end processors, including the consumer version of its Ryzen chips, a CPU that costs less than the Pro version. Over the years, users of these lower-end chips have gotten used to the added security. Recently and without warning or notice, this lower-end line of AMD chips suddenly dropped the protection, and did so in a way that was impossible to detect on Windows machines and required a fair amount of technical work when using Linux.

AMD has yet to say why TSME worked on these CPUs, or even to confirm the change. AMD declined to answer questions sent by email other than to say TSME “is a security feature only applied to PRO CPUs as part of AMD PRO Technologies.” The statement is the first known time the chipmaker has explicitly made this restriction public. […] There’s no indication that AMD ever advertised or marketed TSME as being available in consumer CPUs. AMD has long said that a related memory protection, Secure Memory Encryption (SME), is available only in the Pro and Epyc CPU tiers. SME is OS-managed. It uses a single key and allows the OS to selectively encrypt individual memory pages. TSME is firmware-managed. It encrypts all RAM with no OS involvement. When active, it provides protection against physical attacks, including cold boot exploits, DRAM interface snooping, and memory module removal. It activates silently when enabled in the BIOS, making it the more practically useful of the two protections.
Ben Kilpatrick, a self-described “privacy-conscious Linux hobbyist,” discovered that TSME had stopped working on his consumer Ryzen processor despite remaining enabled in the BIOS. He spent months investigating, persuaded MSI engineers to test multiple CPUs, motherboards, and firmware versions, and filed a public AMD bug report that traced the change to newer AGESA firmware apparently disabling TSME on consumer chips while retaining it on Pro and EPYC models.

“AMD engineers’ comments, such as those mentioned above, and the years of TSME working just fine in the lower-cost tier processors, have understandably conditioned Kilpatrick and other users to reasonably regard it as an expected part of the chip package,” reports Ars Technica. “AMD quietly removing it and providing no acknowledgment or explanation strikes these users as something of a betrayal.”

Joe Fitzgerald, an expert in silicon-level security, said in an interview: “They could have not realized they did it leading to their cagey responses, or they could have done it intentionally and tried to get away with it, leading to the same cagey responses. But I really feel like an explanation should be in order, even if it was ‘TSME was never supposed to be supported. We did ship some firmwares that erroneously enabled it, but you shouldn’t use them since we can’t guarantee it’ll work properly.’"

Trump’s ‘Made In the USA’ Phone Is Just a Reskinned HTC U24 Pro

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Longtime Slashdot reader necro81 writes:
The heavily promoted, $499 T1 “Trump Phone” was originally said to be “Made in the USA” and ship in September 2025. Later, that was downgraded to “Assembled in the USA.” Given the Trump Organization’s lack of engineering or supply chain expertise, many assumed the “T1” would just be a private-label phone made by someone else. After a number of delays, the first phones are finally shipping.

iFixit has performed a teardown and concluded that the T1 is a just gold-painted 2024 HTC U24 Pro — a device from a Taiwanese company, probably using mainland China design and supply chains. In collaboration with NBC News, the iFixit team examined both phones using CT scans, side-by-side teardowns, and even reassembled a working T1 using a U24 Pro main board. As for “assembled in the USA,” that
may
be true, in the same sense that your phone’s repairman can “assemble” a phone from a handful of subassemblies sourced from someone else. Or it may have been assembled in Guangdong, China like the other U24 Pros.

iFixit sums it up: “What you have is not an ‘American-Proud Design,’ but a phone designed in China, made in China, with the vast majority of parts sourced from China. I’m failing to find any stirring of American pride within me. I’ve certainly felt it before, so I can confirm that it is absent at this time.”
Quinn Nelson of Snazzy Labs on YouTube also published a comprehensive video of his experience ordering, unboxing, and tearing down the phone. “From pre-order emails landing in Gmail spam thanks to botched DMARC records, to paying for the $47.45 Trump Mobile 47 Plan over the phone, the entire buying experience was a disaster worthy of its own review,” writes Nelson.

Another con from the conman. Nothing new here.

By MikeDataLink • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Orange man can do no bad though. Can’t wait to watch the maga’s come up with excuses this time. That’s always popcorn material.

And? Thought there should be some “news”.

By Petersko • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Watches, guitars, maga hats… all Chinese products sold with fake patriotism to gullible twits. Just don’t be one of those twits and move on with your life. My dad bought monster cables. He wasn’t getting his money back so I kept my opinion to myself. In the grand scheme of DJT grifting this doesn’t begin to move the needle.

Anyone…

By greytree • Score: 3, Insightful Thread
Anyone who thinks Donald Trump is a trustworthy, reliable guy you can safely buy a phone or a cryptocoin off … hasn’t been awake for 10 years or longer.

Boiling Frogs

By jacks smirking reven • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Yes all the details are silly about this but can we stop and appreciate how fucking insane that we are here discussing the details of the *President of the United States of America* hawking a cell phone of his own company that he profits off to Americans?

Being 1 day after the UFC White House fight I know this seems rather quaint but for real, we’ve gone too far and as the fight last night reminded us a significant portion of the country wanted to do this because they actually really cannot stop thinking about girlcock.

Seriously, though

By fahrbot-bot • Score: 3, Insightful Thread

Is literally anyone surprised at this point - at anything associated with Trump and/or his family?

Britain Unveils Sweeping Ban On Social Media For Under-16s

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Longtime Slashdot reader schwit1 shares a report from NBC News:
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer has announced a sweeping ban on social media use for those under 16, joining other countries around the world seeking to protect children online. “It’s a big step for our country,” Starmer said in a recorded video message released Monday. “Social media is making our children unhappy and unsafe, and as a parent, as much as a Prime Minister, I just can’t let that go on anymore,” he added.

The ban will include social platforms like Snapchat, TikTok, YouTube, Instagram, Facebook and X, while there is no intention for messaging services like WhatsApp and Signal to be included, the government said in a release. […] Starmer’s government called Monday’s announcement a “landmark” move, saying the new measures would be brought to Parliament before Christmas, with protections expected to come into force next spring. Beyond the blanket social media ban, the restrictions will also include blocks on functions such as livestreaming and stranger communication with children for under-16s, it added.
“It’s not an easy thing to do. I’ll be honest about that,” Starmer said. “We haven’t rushed into it. We’ve looked carefully at the evidence, and we’ll have to adapt our approach as technology changes, learn from other countries which are taking similar steps.”
He went on to say that it will face resistance from some of the most powerful companies in the world. “But we will take them on, and we will win, because the need for action could not be any clearer.”

Good old Labour

By 0123456 • Score: 3 Thread

Starmer has clearly given up on the youth vote and is now trying to appeal to the Boomers.

Re:Good old Labour

By thegarbz • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Free speech just died in Britain. Sad.

Something has to exist for it to die. Britain never had free speech as an absolute right.

Re:Good old Labour

By drinkypoo • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Free speech just died in Britain. Sad.

You absolute clown, in Britain facts are not even an absolute defense for slander. The British have absolutely never even gotten close to having free speech.

Fox Is Buying Roku For $22 Billion

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Fox is buying Roku for $22 billion, combining Fox’s sports, news, entertainment, Tubi, and Fox One offerings with a streaming platform that reaches about 100 million people. The companies say the merger would create the “third-largest player in US television by share of viewing,” while Fox insists Roku will remain open to competing apps after the deal closes. CNN reports:
Fox has dabbled in streaming over the past few years — finally launching its Fox One competitor last August — but has lacked a serious streaming business with the ability to compete in a space dominated by YouTube, Netflix, Amazon, Disney+, HBO Max, Paramount+ and Peacock. With CNN parent company Warner Bros. Discovery receiving initial US regulatory approval to combine with Paramount, Fox’s purchase of Roku became more urgent. […] The deal is expected to close in the first half of 2027 with the companies forecasting $400 million in savings.
“This is a defining moment for Fox, and a natural extension of the deliberate and focused strategy we have been executing for nearly a decade,” said Fox CEO Lachlan Murdoch. “Today, we take the next step: bringing together the most valuable live content portfolio in video consumption with the preeminent streaming platform through which America watches it.”
Murdoch said Roku will continue to offer competing apps. “It’s essential that Roku remain open and partner-friendly business. We don’t see that changing at all.”

Layoffs

By darkain • Score: 3 Thread

“The deal is expected to close in the first half of 2027 with the companies forecasting $400 million in savings.”

AKA: mass layoffs.

cord cutting

By danamln • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
Transforming into a targeted ad broker, makes sense while you watch your traditional cable channels earnings dry up.

dead now

By awwshit • Score: 3 Thread

Roku lost me when they became an advertising company. Roku is fully dead to me now.

that’s too much money

By toxonix • Score: 3 Thread

Roku can’t be worth 22 Billion. 100 million users is way-overestimated. If you’re still on a Roku, buy a Shield. It’s the same or at least not worse. I can’t tell. At least the Shield seems to be more stable/better on Wifi.

At first I was in a panic

By vilain • Score: 4, Informative Thread
I started searching for alternatives to the streaming device. They are out there. Then I saw that it will take at least until 2027 to approve the sale, if it goes through. A lot can happen between now and then. There are the midterms, the courts, and “random events”. And there will likely be sales of competitors who want to snap up people who won’t have anything associated with FOX in their lives, so wait for sales. And somewhere is an earlier version of the Google Streaming TV puck in my stuff. I just can’t find it right now. It worked a year ago and it was only $20. Linus Tech Tips said it was the only streaming puck that didn’t have any fuckery buried inside it’s file directory. Now all I have to do is find it.

Google CEO Largely Avoids Discussing AI In Stanford Commencement Speech

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
BrianFagioli writes:
Google CEO Sundar Pichai delivered Stanford University’s 2026 commencement address, but despite leading one of the companies at the center of the AI boom, he spent very little time discussing artificial intelligence. Instead, the speech focused on optimism, working on hard things, and following your interests. The omission is notable given how many graduates are entering a job market being reshaped by AI. While Pichai briefly referenced a “rewiring of technology,” he largely avoided discussing AI’s impact on careers, automation, or the future of work. Was the Google CEO intentionally steering clear of a controversial topic, or was he simply trying to deliver a timeless commencement speech rather than a technology-focused one?
Hyping AI during a commencement speech has been a surefire way to get boos — unless you’re Apple cofounder Steve Wozniak, who reminded college graduates that they already posses “AI” of their own: “actual intelligence.”

You can read Pichai’s commencement speech here.

“If you’re not from here, California is advertised as being really lush and green. But when I looked out the window, it was more… brown,” said Pichai during his speech. “I guess I said this out loud, I’m not sure why. My host, Mrs. Jane Earl, gently corrected me. ‘We prefer to call it golden,’ she said.And that’s exactly what I mean by choosing optimism. It’s about reframing for the positive: Where I saw brown, she saw golden. This slight change of perspective had a huge ripple effect on how I thought about the world around me.”

If you’re afraid to mention AI at Stanford…

By ebunga • Score: 3 Thread

AI as an industry is clearly doomed.

Who wants to be booed?

By memory_register • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

AI at commencement speeches is a losing proposition. There is too much fear and angst at the moment. Even if LLMs create prosperity- and this is still speculation- that is cold comfort to college grads who are being told they spent $100,000 on nothing.

One commencement speech about AI

By JoshuaZ • Score: 3 Thread
Only one commencement speech about AI is going to get applause: https://www.smbc-comics.com/co… .

Falling on tone-deaf ears?

By fahrbot-bot • Score: 3 Thread

Hyping AI during a commencement speech has been a surefire way to get boos

Some, if not all, of those speeches are a little tone deaf. US students on why they booed their pro-AI graduation speakers: ‘They’re not reading the room’

And there are several, so far,
- Florida students boo graduation speaker who called AI ‘next Industrial Revolution’
- Ex-Google CEO Eric Schmidt booed after AI remarks at Arizona commencement
- Google: commencement AI boo.

The only way these commencement speakers could get booed more is if they fell asleep at game #3 of the NBA Finals. :-)

No mention of..

By whitroth • Score: 3 Thread

the students walking out in protest, like the pics I’ve seen?

Swiss Voters Reject Proposal To Cap Population At 10 Million

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Guardian:
Voters in Switzerland have rejected an unprecedented far-right proposal to cap the country’s population at 10 million in a divisive referendum dubbed “the Swiss Brexit.” Some 54.79% of voters were against the proposal by the Swiss People’s party (SVP) and 45.21% were in favor. Turnout was 58.86%. A different outcome would have obliged the Swiss government to limit the population, currently 9.1 million, to 10 million by 2050, enacting tough restrictions on family reunification, residency permits and asylum if the number had reached 9.5 million before that date.

Under the proposals, if the threshold of 10 million people was exceeded before 2050, the Swiss government would have been obliged to withdraw from the country’s free movement agreement with the EU — ending its access to the bloc’s single market. The SVP, which has the most seats in parliament, has for years fueled anti-immigrant sentiment, especially concerning workers from neighboring EU countries. The party had insisted that a so-called “sustainability initiative” was needed to address the increase in population, which it argued was putting pressure on Swiss infrastructure, housing, social programs, natural resources and way of life.
“Voters were worried about negative consequences for Switzerland’s relationship with the EU and for the labour market,” said Urs Bieri, from the polling firm GFS Bern. “People are also worried about things like having enough care and health workers. Also, there’s a feeling that in the current international environment it’s not sensible for a small country to do this.”

Getting what you wish for

By Tony Isaac • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

We know what it looks like when a country’s population no longer grows. It’s not pretty.

Japan is Exhibit A. Younger people are forced to pay more taxes to take care of a disproportionately large elderly population. Elder care becomes more and more expensive, and difficult to find at all.

Countries that welcome immigrants are able to increase the tax base, and supply critical labor that locals don’t want to do, including taking care of the elderly.

Sanity did prevail

By gweihir • Score: 3 Thread

And it was both votes (“Staenderat” and individuals) that rejected it. It would have to win both to become law.

The whole thing is right-wing conservative assholes that cannot do actual solving of problems and hence try to compete with simplistic proposals. Fortunately, enough people saw how badly this idea was thought out and how massive negative the consequences would have been (loss of basically all treaties with the EU if the limit were to trigger).

Re:Getting what you wish for

By gweihir • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

It is even worse for Switzerland. Switzerland is a high-tech nation that does not have enough STEM personnel, because they do not educate enough. Hence they need a massive influx of engineers, MDs, etc. Many (not very smart) Swiss citizens complain, for example, that many MDs are not Swiss, completely overlooking that the alternative is not having enough. Dumb people that cannot think one step ahead is unfortunately also a fact of life in Switzerland....

Are Many College Students Losing the Ability to Read?

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Futurism reports:
in a new essay for The Chronicle Higher Education, university-level literature and writing instructor Tyler Jagt recalls how not a single one of his students could get through an assigned 20-page article, something that he had read “without complaint” as an undergraduate a decade ago.

One student confessed that the reason they didn’t finish was that they kept losing track of what the paper was about. And there’s no doubt that they’re not alone. Jagt cites the 2024 National Assessment of Educational Progress reading assessment results released last year. It showed that 12th grade reading scores were at the lowest level since the assessment began in 1992. Nearly a third of those 12th graders scored below the assessment’s “basic” level in reading, meaning they likely “cannot draw general conclusions based on concepts presented explicitly in a text.” Younger children aren’t better off: a recent report from the Annie E. Casey Foundation found that 70 percent of fourth graders, or around two million kids, can’t read at a proficient level.

“What I am seeing in my classroom is no longer a hunch,” Jagt writes. “There is a measurable, generational collapse in sustained reading and writing, and the academy is responding to it with improvisation and exhaustion rather than the structural overhaul it requires....” Jagt cites an MIT study that found users who used ChatGPT during cognitive tasks like writing essays showed lower brain activity in areas associated with creativity compared to students who only used a traditional Google Search or didn’t lookup information at all. An astonishing 83 percent of the AI users couldn’t quote a single line from the essays they had just written, and capstoning the alarm, the brain activity in the AI users didn’t return to normal when they were later asked to write without AI…

On our pernicious pocket devices, Jagt touted a 2017 study that found that simply having a smartphone physically nearby — even if it’s face down or turned off — reduced available cognitive capacity and impaired cognitive functioning. “So when a student tells me they ‘kept losing track’ of a 20-page article, I have to acknowledge that they may be describing a measurable neurological condition,” Jagt wrote. “The neural pathways that support sustained attention are built by use, and they atrophy without it. Your body is a use-it-or-lose-it system, and the brain is no exception.”
Sunday an "Ask Reddit” question went viral — drawing over 11,000 upvotes — for its question to any teachers reading Reddit. “Is the ‘Gen Alpha can’t read (write, or do math ext)' crisis real? If so how bad is it?” Some responses…

Thanks to long-time Slashdot reader schwit1 for sharing the article.


Re:And AI will make this worse

By lucifuge31337 • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

The correllary to “use it or lose it” is that the brain isn’t just going idle, it’s refocusing its efforts on other things that you are “using” instead.

The average person today could hardly identify all the wild edible plants in their area, change a horseshoe, or build a proper barn, like their ancestors hundreds of years ago could.

By contrast, their ancestors hundreds of years ago probably couldn’t read.

Brains don’t just go idle; they just refocus on different things. A wealthy Victorian often pursued a life of a polymath, seeking varied intellectual pursuits and sometimes making great discoveries, but they could probably scarcely tell you how to mend a shoe or even change a nappy - that was their servants job.

Also, it’s quite the spin to present low MRI activity as “reduced function”. It’s commonly literally the opposite. If you present a novice with a task they’re not used to, and an expert with the same task, the expert will tend to show much less activity than the novice, as the novice has to think harder to accomplish it, whereas it’s become rote for the expert. Low activation on a task is commonly a sign of cognitive efficiency.

You seem to be confusing exceptional people with the average or below average, which is what this article is about. You are also disputing the methodology by bringing up a situation discussed nowhere in the article or paper where it fails rather than saying what they actually did and challeninging that. All of this framing and presupposing seems to be the new rhetoric format and it’s not the slightest bot convincing and makes the purveyors of it looks reall, really unintelligent.

Re:This is why…

By AmiMoJo • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Good for you, but don’t be too quick to blame other parents.

In the 1980s, a single parent on typical wage could afford a decent house, nice car, and to raise a family of spouse and 2-3 children. Nowadays two parents working full time can’t afford a single child in many places.

It’s not just money that is tight, time is too. Both parents working, both tired after work, and increasingly with side hustles.

Re:This is why…

By drinkypoo • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Expecting having children to mean you cannot have a life means you are deep throating the boot.

This country used to have enough prosperity for that to happen, now it doesn’t, and you accept that. That’s because you’re weak and pathetic.

Demand more, don’t be a fucking cuck happy to watch billionaires fuck your country.

Re:This is why…

By ArchieBunker • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

That explains the falling birth rate.

Re: Yes

By Calydor • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I disagree. Reading is like exercise for the brain. Saying that we don’t have to read because we have tools to do it for us is like saying we don’t have to walk around because we have cars. Sure it’s true on a surface level, but the deeper consequences will get severe.

IT Workers Are Now Struggling to Find Work, as ‘Picky’ Companies Demand AI Skills

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“Battered by years of mass layoffs, California tech workers were hoping the job market would rebound this year,” reports the Los Angeles Times. “But things are getting worse.”
The class divide is widening in Silicon Valley as a tiny group of employees is landing unprecedented packages for AI skills, while many others struggle to find work. The have-nots are doing everything that used to guarantee great jobs — refreshing resumes, optimizing LinkedIn profiles and doing interviews — but companies are much more picky these days. The tech jobless are rethinking their lives. Some are taking pay cuts, others are leaving tech. Some are going back to study or launch startups. Some have retired....

Since 2022, more than 815,500 tech workers have been laid off, according to Layoffs.fyi, a website that tracks job cuts. The tsunami of pink slips surged in 2023, when companies that had gone on hiring sprees during the COVID-19 pandemic began to cut back. From January to April, U.S. tech employers announced 85,411 job cuts this year, up 33% from the same period last year, according to global outplacement and executive coaching firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas. The Public Policy Institute of California estimates that the number of information jobs — which includes jobs in hard-hit Hollywood as well as tech — tumbled 17% between the middle of 2022 and this February. The San Francisco Bay Area has been hardest hit, the institute said in a recent report, with the number of jobs declining by 0.4%, compared with 7.5% growth over a similar time span before COVID-19 slammed into the U.S. economy.

Tech layoffs are also spilling over into other industries. Automaker General Motors laid off roughly 600 workers in its information technology department, and Walmart is reportedly laying off or relocating roughly 1,000 workers in its technology and products teams. Recruiters say companies have become much more selective, requiring AI skills, combining different positions and interviewing more people for each job. “You’re seeing elongated hiring cycles,” said Robert Lucido, senior director of strategic advisory at Magnit, a California company that helps tech giants and other businesses manage contractors, freelancers and other contingent workers. “There’s more opportunity to fill the need that they truly want.”

Paul Flaharty, district president at staffing firm Robert Half in Los Angeles, said companies are laying off workers, but also creating new roles tied to AI initiatives. “For individuals that are displaced, it’s really important that they find ways to upskill themselves so that they can make themselves as attractive as possible for these new jobs that are being created,” he said. Kira Martins was already taking on more work in a small team at Snap — the parent company of disappearing messaging app Snapchat — when she was laid off in April. The company said the layoffs were to cut costs as it focuses on profitability, noting how employees are using AI to “reduce repetitive work, increase velocity, and better support our community, partners, and advertisers....” Martins, a 36-year-old Los Angeles resident, views AI as a tool and is optimistic about finding her next role. People still need to decide how to use AI and check the work it generates, she said. “In tech, you want to be a first adopter, because if you don’t move quickly, it’s very easy to become irrelevant,” she said. “Everyone’s kind of hopping on the AI train.”
A former Google worker (laid off more than a year ago) says he’s still job hunting, according to the article, and “he’s learned it’s not enough to just apply in this competitive market. Workers really need to network and leverage their connections to get seen by hiring managers and stand out.”

But when 64-year-old product manager Bruce Bowers lost his job at Oracle — along with thousands of others — he just started his retirement early.

Re:Yeah, I Noped Out

By Sarusa • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Oh yeah, sorry to reply to my own post, but I could have written that network app he spent six months trying to do with Claude in a week (leaving plenty of room) - give another week (not full time) for testing and feedback and changes and it’s totally done in two weeks, one actual week of work at the outside. Woulda cost way less and it would be secure, upgradable, and maintainable. But we can’t have nice things in the hellscape of 202x.

Re:comms

By Parsiuk • Score: 5, Informative Thread
There’s much more than just writing the promp here. I believe knowing how to use external tools, MCP servers, skills, md-files, etc. and how to integrate agents into your workflow goes a long way these days. It’s not about “vibecoding”, it’s about getting sh*t done faster.

Re:comms

By outsider007 • Score: 5, Informative Thread

I believe knowing how to use external tools, MCP servers, skills, md-files, etc. and how to integrate agents into your workflow goes a long way these days.

I feel like nowadays you can just go: “Claude, add a mcp-server”. Or “Claude, add a skill to do so and so”

Re:Yeah, I Noped Out

By Fons_de_spons • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
I hear this a lot. I am not a professional programmer, I used to do hardware design, where mistakes are very costly, but I do program for some hobby stuff. Of course I use AI. It is great for hobby work! I let it do the boring stuff. But long story short, the code indeed sucks! You still need to think about everything and word it precisely and even then it will miss stuff. Meaning testing becomes even more cumbersome. On more than one occasion I threw it all in the bin after a few hours and did it myself from scratch.
Using AI in the hardware world? Instant impressive cost reduction. Bankruptcy after everyone cashed their bonus and the product fails miserably in the field. What surprises me is how almost every programmer says this and how this is completely ignored. Management is behaving like a squealing audio system. The microphone is too close to a speaker. Out of touch with reality and squealing the same tone. AI AI AI AI AI. Nothing can change the sound.
This is a perception problem and from experience, I see this only getting solved in one way. Companies hitting the wall at 100mph. I will enjoy that moment.
I have seen these things happen on a much smaller scale. You think they will learn something? Nope, next is the blame game. Been in a meeting where my boss ranted at me. “Why did you not tell me this was going to be a big issue.” “Uhm sir, I prepared a little document showing all the steps I took to flag this. Including dancing naked on my desk with a big sign saying that this was going south.” “You techies just do not know how to get a message through! You should have shouted! You should have hit my desk with your fist and stand your ground! This is your fault!” (Figure out yourself what the hyperboles are here ;-)
The alternative is that we are completely out of touch with reality. With all what is going on, it is a thought lurking in the back of my head. So many people can’t be wrong? Time will tell. Sooner or later, time will tell.
Corporate sucks these days. I moved to an insignificant teacher position. It is a school in a rich district. Kids get dropped of with the second car of the mother: a porsche.But it is diverse due to diversity rules mandated by government. Some kids can’t afford basic food. Colleagues are great. Kids are great, but themselves of course. Then there are the parent meetings. 90% of people are great as well, nice and understanding. Then the corporate types walk in. Instant domination attempts, demanding to see an action plan. “What are you going to do about my son’s low grades!” I love it when that happens. After the talk, when they concluded they did not had a grip on me and notice I have a sharp tongue as well: “Are you laughing at me? You are laughing at me!”, they storm to the principal. An old lady, close to retirement, nothing to lose, who states the facts in the most dry manner possible and then leaves a long silence.
Too many of us think they are gods, while we all are just apes with some small updates. … this felt good.

Al skills?

By El_Muerte_TDS • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I thought these Al were really intelligent and powerful, why do I need special skills for them? Can’t I just tell them what to do?

US-Iran Peace Agreement Prompts Stock Rally, Leaves Some Investors Skeptical and Questions on Speed of Resuming Oil Production

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“Asian stocks rallied Monday while oil prices tumbled,” reports CNBC, “after the U.S. and Iran agreed to a peace deal aimed at ending nearly four months of conflict…”
The strongest reaction was seen in energy markets. U.S. crude oil futures for July delivery were down 4.77% to $80.83 per barrel by 8:27 p.m. ET. Brent futures, the international benchmark, for August delivery traded about 4% lower to $83.77 per barrel. Asian equities surged. South Korea’s Kospi jumped 5.1%, Japan’s Nikkei 225 climbed 3.6%, and the broader Topix advanced 2.6%… The U.S. dollar index weakened 0.32% to 99.483, while the yield on the benchmark 10-year Treasury note fell 5 basis points to 4.423%, suggesting that investors were dialing back inflation concerns on easing energy prices. “The most immediate implication is a repricing of the inflation risk premium that markets have been carrying since the Strait closed,” said Billy Leung, investment strategist at Global X ETFs…

Besides safe-haven Treasurys, gold also rose. “Gold is the interesting outlier here,” Leung said. “In a clean risk-on trade, gold should be selling off as the geopolitical premium unwinds, but it is holding bid around $4,300, which tells you the market is not fully trusting the deal yet.” Spot gold prices were up almost 2% at $4,302.19 per ounce. That skepticism reflects lingering uncertainty around the agreement, which remains unsigned and subject to implementation risks. [Josh Gilbert, lead Asia Pacific analyst at trading platform eToro] cautioned that “the deal isn’t actually signed until June 19th, the details are still thin, and this conflict has shown more than once that headlines can turn on a dime.”

Analysts at Commonwealth Bank of Australia also stressed that the oil outlook hinges on how quickly shipping and production can normalize. Vivek Dhar, head of commodities and sustainability research at CBA, expects Brent to fall to around $80 a barrel by year-end, assuming the Strait remains open and exports recover. However, he warned that damage to refining infrastructure, the presence of sea mines and uncertainty over tanker traffic could slow the return to normal operations. Even so, he said markets are likely to take comfort from the prospect that oil flows need only recover to around 60%-70% of pre-war levels to restore expectations of a global supply surplus.

For investors, the biggest implication will likely be what cheaper energy means for inflation and central banks. Lower oil prices ease pressure on households and businesses while reducing the risk of a broader inflation resurgence just as major central banks enter a busy week of policy meetings.
UPDATE: “A US official is rejecting Iran’s assertion that it will receive billions of dollars in frozen funds before a planned 60-day negotiating period begins following Friday’s signing of an agreement,” reports CNN:
The pushback came after Iran’s deputy foreign minister, Kazem Gharibabadi, said the next phase of talks would depend on Washington first fulfilling several obligations, including releasing Iranian funds frozen abroad. The differing accounts underscore a significant gap between how the United States and Iran are describing what must happen before the next round of negotiations can move forward.

Re:If I were a betting man…

By 93 Escort Wagon • Score: 5, Funny Thread

I was halfway expecting him to be “honored” with an UFC peac prize between cage matches tonight.

Re:Trump vs Iran.

By 0123456 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

> The Iranian dictatorship has been attacking America for 40 years.

Where in America was the last Iranian attack?

> That said, what Trump did was crazy, and Iran might be more likely to get a nuclear weapon now than they were a year ago.

Iran now knows that the only thing which will protect you from an American attack is nukes. It seems they’re offering not to build any, but any sane country would be building as many as they could at this point.

Fool me 38 times

By WaffleMonster • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The press is flat wrong. There is no peace agreement. At best there is a MOU about which both sides are asserting diametrically opposing views. Trump is constantly just making shit up. It is better not to entertain anything until it happens.

Re:Trump vs Iran.

By gtall • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

more to the point, he doesn’t have a skillset for much of anything. Even his financial people for his “companies” admit he cannot read a spreadsheet. All those numbers and their magnitudes confuse him. And this is why he continually fucks up the U.S. economy. You can see his confusion where he’ll equate selling Bibles for what are peanuts with mega-deals to people offering billions. You can also see it in his “companies” where he micro-managed pennies yet still managed to go bankrupt 6-7 times because of major financial fuck ups. He literally cannot tell the difference between magnitudes other than someone explained to him that one number was greater than another.

He also has the attention span of a gnat. He cannot calculate 2nd and 3rd order effects. Many people cannot but, if they are in a position of power, are smart enough to surround themselves with people who can do that sort of planning. He doesn’t surround himself with such people because he cannot get past “me wants”, like 5 yr. old. This makes him susceptible to the Project 2025 people who can easily convince him that something they want is something he wants. He doesn’t know how to get it, so they explain how he can get it by directing his administration on the steps. And most of his “schemes” are hatched that way, with the obvious fuck ups resulting. He’s like Putin gormlessly believing the spooks that Ukraine would be a push over. And if Biden had any balls, Ukraine would have already taken Moscow by now.

Re:Glorious success!

By AmiMoJo • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Iran won. Before the war, few believed that they could survive a direct attack by the US, but now it’s very clear that they control the Strait, and can bring the global economy down whenever they like. The US can’t stop them, nobody can.

The only winning move is to get off oil as fast as possible, which is the opposite of what the US is doing.

Meanwhile Israel continues to do whatever it likes, and the US has no control there either. All they can do is send more free stuff to the Israelis. Doubtless the ceasefire will last only hours before Israel breaks it.

It’s actually kind of astounding how badly this has turned out, for everyone except Iran and Russia.

Workers Spend As Much Time ‘Botsitting’ AI As Producing Useful Work, Survey Finds

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“As the use of artificial intelligence spreads across companies worldwide, it is relieving workers of tedious old chores but creating new ones,” reports the Los Angeles Times.

“Most people don’t realize the amount of time that they’re spending working on the tools to get the time savings that they’re professing,” said Paul Leonardi, Duca Family professor of technology management at UC Santa Barbara.”
Leonardi is one of the co-authors of the new study published by the Work AI Institute, whose contributors include academics from Stanford University and UC Berkeley. The institute is sponsored by AI company Glean… The research surveyed 6,000 digital workers across the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia between December and January. The report found that we are in a phase of significant personal productivity gains, but few companies are translating these gains into revenue and business growth. While 75% of individuals reported a boost in productivity, only 13% of the organizations say they have seen significant business gains as a result of AI adoption, the survey found…

The reason the boost in productivity sometimes leads to waste, Leonardi said, is the time people spend correcting the bot’s work and gathering the right files, documentation, and tacit knowledge required for it to produce high-quality output. “It’s pretty striking the amount of time and effort people are spending,” Leonardi said. Most employees now spend over six hours a week of their workday babysitting their work chatbots, the survey said. There is a “thick, mostly invisible layer of human labor holding the whole thing together,” the report said. The survey found that for every hour a worker spends getting useful output from AI, they spend roughly another hour making it usable. Of the total time workers spend interacting with AI each week, 37% goes to botsitting, 36% to actually using the tool to produce work.

Part of the reason so much time disappears into botsitting is how often the tools fall short: Workers report that more than a third of AI sessions fail outright, requiring a full restart or substantial rework. Paradoxically, as more workers hand over bigger parts of their jobs to AI, they are offloading personal judgment and responsibilities to the bots. The survey found 41% of workers say they sometimes deliver AI-generated work they couldn’t explain if asked… “I think what’s happening with a lot of these Gen AI tools right now is we’re essentially expecting individual contributors to act as managers,” Leonardi said. “They’re just managing these AI tools, AI agents, and we’re expecting that they’ll be able to produce way more, but we’re not taking into account all of the work that actually goes into managing.”

This problem isn’t likely to go away.

Starting with the assumption that AI is faster

By thesjaakspoiler • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

and then I always realize afterwards that I did spent a lot of time making it actually work.
Not to talk about the nasty bugs and the lack of error handling.

Re:Starting with the assumption that AI is faster

By Tony Isaac • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Exactly. Executives are *so* sure that AI is 5x to 10x faster, that any measurements to the contrary are disbelieved.

After all, these executives have *all* seen how well Claude can spit out a PowerPoint that looks great, they think it *must* be just as good at coding! Never mind that those PowerPoints they just generated, are usually not effective at communicating their points because they have so much fluff that doesn’t matter. And never mind that if the PowerPoint is wrong in some small way, it doesn’t actually matter, while with code, you can have disastrous consequences for a small error.

“tedious old chores”

By karmawarrior • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

> it is relieving workers of tedious old chores but creating new ones

If it were relieving workers of tedious old chores, it’d probably be more popular.

From what I can see it’s doing the fun parts and leaving the shit parts - us checking it did it correctly - to us.

I went into programming because I enjoyed programming. I would imagine that’s true of 99% of programmers. You know what’s boring? Checking the code afterwards.

Maybe if the genAI companies found ways to use their technology to automate actual chores, like washing up, cleaning the house, or even (not always!) doing the cooking when we come home exhausted, and driving when our idiot bosses force us to do work at an office, instead of programming, making “art”, and stealing shit and rewriting it 100 different ways, it’d be more popular and actually a net positive for the world. People might even spend money on it!

If genAI is truly as intelligent as its addicts claim, that ought to be easy, right?

Definitely #2

By Somervillain • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Of your options, if #1 was the correct answer, we’d see a gap between those who have experience and mastery and those who don’t. Sure…some suck at AI…but not everyone would…unless it was the AI that sucked. Like all tools/frameworks…if they’re valuable, those who embrace it well reap the benefits, outpacing those who don’t. A great example was cloud or big data. Startups came out of nowhere to overtake established players by leveraging these technologies.

To date, there’s no AI success story, outside of pick and shovel vendors. No startup has leveraged AI to disrupt an existing market and become a household name. Netflix famously leveraged the internet to disrupt Blockbuster’s stranglehold on home movies....first with DVD by mail and then with streaming. Salesforce, love them or hate them, disrupted many established players.

If AI ACTUALLY improved productivity, smaller companies would come out of nowhere and eat the lunch of more established players by out-innovating them. Some obvious examples are entertainment. Some game studio from some surprising location would come out with AMAZING AAA games at twice the speed and half the cost. Various business platforms would take on the many fat targets: Microsoft, SAP, Oracle, etc…leveraging AI to out-innovate larger competitors.

You and I may suck at AI and improve with experience…but someone out there is waaaay ahead of us....waaaay more gifted and would theoretically be leveraging AI to build massive projects with tiny teams. But for now, the only people making money are selling tools or computer chips or building data centers for this circular AI economic bubble.

Botsitting _is_ the new work.

By Qbertino • Score: 4, Informative Thread

If the bot is 30x better than me on a bad day, botsitting is my new fucking main task. Obviously. In the last 6 months me and my AI metasubscription have grown to become a 10 head pro devteam with me at the helm. I’ve basically mutated into a chief senior lead and a full crew at zero extra cost and _ less_ effort for me. It would be irresponsible for me not to botsit and hold up everything by hand-coding myself. My current productivity would drop 10x instantly.

Bottom line: The bots are here and they’ve taken over. Get out of the way you slow-ass bipedal meatbag.

Microsoft Updates Six Windows Apps. ‘Photos’ Gets Watermarks for Copilot Images (Off by Default)

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Microsoft dropped “massive” updates for six stock Windows apps, reports the “Microsoft enthusiast” site Neowin.

Here’s some of their more interesting highlights for Clock, Media Player, Calculator, Voice Recorder, Photos, and Paint:

The Photos app (version 2026.11060.2004.0):

Calculator (version 11.2605.9.0):

The Clock app (version 11.2605.9.0):

Media Player (version 11.2605.14.0).


“massive”

By TheMiddleRoad • Score: 5, Funny Thread
“massive” my “assive”.

Oh My God

By Gleenie • Score: 3 Thread

Looks like I gave up and went 100% Linux on my new gaming PC 6 months too soon. Is it too late to come back?

Re:Microsoft square-root :o

By Gleenie • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Surely the “correct” icon for midnight sun regions should show both. I mean, the moon *does* come up during the day, even in temperate regions. Sometimes it even crosses the sun and we get a cool eclipse.

Speaking of Clocks

By Ol Olsoc • Score: 3 Thread
Why hasn’t Microsoft increased their clock accuracy?

I have some programs that need pretty accurate timing, and always have to use Meinburg and NTP on the windows version to get it close enough. MacOS doesn’t have this issue.

UK Scientists See Little Evidence for Claims Smartphones Are Rewiring Kids’ Brains

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
UK’s Members of Parliament (MP) were “looking for proof that smartphones and social media are rotting children’s brains,” writes The Register — but they got “a less satisfying answer from neuroscientists on Wednesday: nobody can really prove it.”
Appearing before the Science, Innovation and Technology Committee this week, three researchers spent much of the session explaining that concern and evidence are not quite the same thing. Asked what evidence exists on the impact of digital devices on infants and young children, Professor Denis Mareschal, director of the Centre for Brain and Cognitive Development at Birkbeck, replied: “There is very little, if any, causal research in the early years. Almost everything is correlational.”

MPs kept coming back to the question — and the experts kept coming back to the same answer. When questioned about social media’s impact on adolescents, Professor Sarah-Jayne Blakemore of the University of Cambridge was equally cautious. “What evidence do we have of the impact of digital devices or social media on the adolescent brain?” she asked. “Almost nothing. There are a few small studies, but they haven’t been replicated, and they’re purely correlational....”

MPs also wanted to know whether neuroscience could settle one of the liveliest arguments in the debate: how old a child should be before they’re allowed onto social media. “What neuroscience can’t do is pinpoint a precise age,” Blakemore said. “The individual differences in brain development are vast....” If there was a takeaway from the hearing, it was that concern about digital childhood is running well ahead of the evidence needed to settle the argument.

Asked and…(wait for it)…answered.

By geekmux • Score: 5, Funny Thread

“What evidence do we have of the impact of digital devices or social media on the adolescent brain?”

* stare-buffering *

* stare-buffering *

* stare-buffering *

(GenZ) “Wait..wut?”

Credit where due.

By PseudoThink • Score: 5, Funny Thread

The researchers would like to thank Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta, and Netflix for their generous support and funding.

Re:Credit where due.

By Valgrus Thunderaxe • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
This is the new Satanic Panic. It’ll look as silly in 20 as the hysteria over Ozzy and D&D.

You want a photo of it??

By markdavis • Score: 4, Informative Thread

>“UK Scientists funded by big tech See Little Evidence for Claims Smartphones Are Rewiring Kids’ Brains”

Um, exactly what “evidence” are they looking for? Something on various brain scans? I can guarantee there are lots of thought/behavior issues that can’t be “seen.” I don’t think most people are claiming obsessive phone use is “rewiring” brain functions. But the evidence are the BEHAVIORS that are seen before/during/after long exposures, especially when combined with social media use on them. If there aren’t studies showing this, then they aren’t looking very hard.

For many, there are clearly addictive behaviors that cause them to suffer from constant distraction, anxiety, inability to focus, attention disorders, and various social interaction issues, especially if denied access to their screens for extended periods of time. And this affects adults as well as children. Children just tend to be more vulnerable.

For example, one survey showed 25% of people actually interact with their phones WHILE ACTIVELY DRIVING.... Illegal and clearly an extremely dangerous endeavor. 30% while at meals with others, 38% while using the bathroom (really???), 80% while walking around outside, ignoring traffic, other people, interesting sights, being situationally completely unaware.

Re: Credit where due.

By Fons_de_spons • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
Teacher here, I can spot the kids that do not have a time limit on their smartphone from miles away. Occasionally want to hit the parents’ heads against a wall. I am however not allowed to do that.

As ‘Disclosure Day’ Premieres, Steven Spielberg Says He Believes Aliens Really Have Visited Earth

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Steven Spielberg grants that his 1977 UFO film Close Encounters was “speculative,” writes the Associated Press, but "Disclosure Day, he insists, is the real deal.”
“It’s my first film that will be considered science fiction that I do not consider to be science fiction,” Spielberg said in a recent interview. “It’s much more reflective of the world as it is evolving and discoveries that are being made as we speak.” Spielberg, at 79, is trying to revive and reconsider the alien wonder that’s long lingered in his mind, from “E.T.” to “War of the Worlds.” “Disclosure Day,” Spielberg’s first summer movie in a decade, is already being hailed as one of his best in years. But this time, Spielberg is testing whether he can conjure some of his trademark movie magic less with imagination than with conviction. “I’ve been a believer since I made ‘Close Encounters’ 50 years ago,” Spielberg says. “But I would always say: Until I’ve seen a UAP or a UFO with my own eyes, I’m not going to categorically state that life from out there has come here. But I’ve changed that,” he adds. “I’m now willing to change my mind because of the circumstantial evidence which is overwhelming…”

Spielberg, having long followed reports of alleged alien encounters, was inspired by the 2023 House Subcommittee on National Security hearing on UAPs: Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena. Among the witnesses was whistleblower and former Air Force intelligence officer David Grusch, who testified that the government concealed a program investigating UAPs. The Pentagon then denied it… Those 2023 testimonies and others so fueled Spielberg that he produced a 50-page treatment on what would become “Disclosure Day.” During the writing process with Koepp, he texted him more notes, he says, “than I’ve ever sent to anyone in my life.”

“There was a period in there where I believe he re-read the script every single day for a year,” Koepp says. “We’d be in different time zones and I would wake up to 30 or 35 texts from his most current reading of the script. When the leader of the project has that level of commitment, it tends to bring along everyone. You up your game.”
The article calls it “a grand bookend for one of the most cosmically-minded moviemakers of our time.” But the man who filmed some of the world’s first summer blockbusters also shared his thoughts on the future of movies. “Even though the numbers are still not pre-COVID level numbers for any films being released now, it’s more robust than it has been for many years. The audience gives me belief that people still want to congregate in a dark space in the company of strangers to share an experience of a film made by storytellers. And that gives me faith to continue making films.”

Rolling Stone wrote that "There’s a lot to love in Disclosure Day.” Though they also offer this pithy summary of its plot. “Remember when Steven Spielberg digitally replaced the guns in the hands of government agents for the 20th anniversary of E.T., then expressed regret about the decision? Imagine that he not only restored the weapons but crafted an entire two-and-a-half-hour feature around that one sequence as a mea culpa. That’s Disclosure Day.”
The filmmaker may be staging a pulpy campaign with this sci-fi throwback, but he sincerely seems to believe the truth is out there — and will set us free… [W]hile the quality of his output can vary wildly when you look at the big picture of his career, there’s still a baseline of love — for filmmaking, for storytelling through images, for giving people an experience that pushes emotional buttons and taps adrenal glands — that gives his work a sense of vitality and displays the sensibility of an artist at work…

There’s also a weird full-circle feel to it, and not just because he’s returning to the fertile ground of Close Encounters and his other science fiction spectacles. You can see traces of everything from Duel to Minority Report show up, to the point where this almost doubles as a career retrospective in miniature… Yes, Spielberg does believe that we are not the only game running in the cosmos. But he also believes that our better angels have not left the building, and that movies still have the power to communally blow minds and open hearts.
The Associated Press calls it “a grand bookend for one of the most cosmically-minded moviemakers of our time” and “a distant answer to the final notes of Close Encounters.”

Re:For real or for the marketing?

By jhoegl • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
Dreaming is always a great thing. Sci-Fi has given us versions of what we see now. Most referenced is Star Trek from the 1960s. how much of that is real now in some form or another?

Who cares if he believes it, just like who cares if people believe in their religion. it doesnt matter, as long as you dream of a better future and world.

Everything we know about physics

By RightwingNutjob • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

says ftl isn’t a thing and the answer to Fermi’s paradox is that everyone is out there but too far away to hear.

Alienz! would imply necessarily that there is quite a bit about the way of things that we don’t even know that we don’t know.

Possibly it is discoverable in the foreseeable future or just as possibly it requires an inordinate amount of dumb luck to stumble on the conditions of time and place in space where such a discovery (if it even exists) is possible.

Whole lot of very big ifs. Not a whole lot of reason to just believe the way one might just believe that a better chatbot is just around the corner or a vaccine for the common cold is sitting in a test tube somewhere just waiting to be tested and commercialized.

The latter extrapolates within the known unknowns. The former is predicated on the existence of specific unknown unknowns.

No reason to keep it secret

By gurps_npc • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Keeping aliens secret is political suicide. People do not trust the government already, you just declare yourself to be an untrustworthy liar - worse than Trump (who if we were keeping aliens secret would immediately tweet it out).

The claim is we do this to.... prevent panic?????

Mankind has never ‘panicked’. Not the way this stupid conspiracy myth implies. We created nuclear weapons and there was no panic. We created and used nasty poison gas and nobody panicked.

You know what get people in the street and calling for the government to resign?
Slavery (Sparticus, Civil War, etc.)
Preventing women from Voting (multiple times in multiple countries)
Kicking black women off a bus because she took a seat
Treating civilians so badly they set themselves on fire (Jasmine Revolution)

While I am sure a few morons will panic on hearing aliens exist, but no one cares when a few MORE lunatics buy all the guns and dig a bunker.

Re:For real or for the marketing?

By Powercntrl • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Most referenced is Star Trek from the 1960s. how much of that is real now in some form or another?

Transporters? Nope.
FTL space travel? Nope.
Post-scarcity society where people work to better themselves rather than in the pursuit of personal profit? Definitely nope.
Food replicators? Nope.
Energy-based weapons? Mostly still not practical, and the real-world versions (lasers, masers) predate Star Trek.
Androids? We’re pretty close.
VR addiction? Has been known to happen. If extended to addiction to any technology in general (smartphone addiction, doomscrolling, etc.), widely common.
People falling in love with AI characters? Rare, but does happen.

Re:Disclosure!

By twosat • Score: 4, Funny Thread

A bunch of people are convinced that the appropriate greeting when meeting a space alien is “Gnorts.”
Why “Gnorts”, you ask?
It’s simple. In the heavily-orchestrated, government-disinformation-rich Apollo Moon landing program, what was the name the government used to refer to the first man who landed on the Moon?
“Neil Armstrong.”
Yeah, right, as if that’s his real name. Turns out it was in code.
Backwards, it is:
“Gnorts, Mr. Alien!”

Will Meta’s $14 Billion Bet on AI Ever Pay Off?

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“A year after spending over $14 billion to bring in Alexandr Wang and a group of his top Scale AI engineers to revamp its artificial intelligence efforts, Meta is at least back on the map in AI,” reports CNBC, “though it’s still far behind OpenAI, Anthropic and Google in the market.”
Wang’s big accomplishment was the delivery of the Muse Spark AI model in April, marking Meta’s first jump into proprietary foundation models and away from a strict adherence to open source, or open weight as it’s more commonly called in AI… “Meta needs to provide more proof points of both adoption and commercialization,” said Ralph Schackart, an analyst at William Blair who recommends buying the stock. “Investors are looking for Meta to monetize a new AI-first product, beyond the substantial positive impact AI is having on enhancing the advertising models.” Wall Street, at least so far, is unimpressed. Meta’s stock is down 18% over the past 12 months, the worst performer in the megacap group, along with Microsoft, which has its own challenges in AI. That’s even after Meta reported 33% revenue growth in the first quarter, the fastest rate of expansion for any period since 2021.

For Meta, the problem started with what some industry experts called, in hindsight at least, a strategic blunder. The company jumped into AI with its Llama family of models, offering an open-source approach that allowed developers to freely tinker, while the other big model makers charged for access. In April of last year, Meta’s release of Llama 4 fell flat, failing to captivate developers and leading Zuckerberg to reconsider his company’s approach to AI development… Since the release of Muse Spark, Meta has unveiled new AI and business-related subscription plans as part of an effort to expand its business beyond online ads. Historically, it hasn’t worked. Meta still counts on ads for 98% of revenue. Schackart said he wants to see “tangible evidence of a growing list of new, AI-first products created by Muse Spark, even if monetization lags.” He said that’s “what investors are looking for.”

No matter how good Wang’s model may be, Zuckerberg has a high hill to climb with developers coming off the Llama debacle. “I think the AI community largely ignores Meta at this point,” said Rob May, CEO of the startup Neurometric, which works in the realm of token engineering.... Krish Subramanian, the CEO of consulting firm KOI AI and former product head at IBM Consulting, said developers are more excited about Google’s AI models than what Meta is offering. The appeal of Llama was that it specifically targeted developers wanting open-weight alternative models, while with Muse Spark, Meta has made little effort in that direction, he said. “The lack of developer trust will come back to hit them if they don’t focus on third-party developers,” Subramanian said, noting that it took years for Microsoft to regain trust from open-source coders during the early days of Azure. “To just focus on a walled-garden kind of an ecosystem and ad revenue as the main source of income, they probably will never become the big player,” he said.

A Meta spokesperson pointed to Wang’s recent comments about the company’s continued support for the open-source ecosystem, and said Meta still plans to offer outside developers access to Muse Spark’s underlying technology via an API, as it previously announced. “We’re already testing with some early partners, and look forward to releasing it this month,” the spokesperson said.
“That Zuckerberg’s metaverse and virtual reality ambitions have generated over $80 billion in total losses since late 2020 makes the AI pitch a tougher sell,” the article points out, citing this observation from Howard Yu, business professor at Switzerland’s International Institute for Management Development.

“He’s running out of the space for his credibility to last,” Yu said. “I think the virtual reality foray may have burned up a lot of his goodwill in front of investors.”

Never held accountable

By jacks smirking reven • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The fact Zuckerberg is still at the head of this company is an indictment against our economy, our culture and the entire problem people have with the wealthy: once you are wealthy you can fuckup seemingly an infinite number of times and not suffer any consequences.

First the general social issues with Facebook with it’s corrosive algorithms. That should have sunk him. Then sinking how many billions into the metaverse, so much so that you renamed the company? Could any of us make that scale of mistake and not only keep our job but even make more money?

And now this, another failed billion dollar loss and even if he is removed from the CEO role he’ll get a multi million exit package, keep all the stock, remain on the board and probably be able to swing more venture capital to new companies.

I don’t support what Luigi Mangione did by any stretch but I also find it incredulous when people act perplexed about people who do support his action and like, when you see shit like this…

AI investments may not be meant to “pay off”

By ffkom • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Of course those currently investing other people’s money into AI infrastructure cannot say that part out loud just yet, but there may be no intention to make AI investments “profitable” in the classical sense. If you are convinced that AI will perform thinking better and cheaper than humans, and Robots will perform physical work better and cheaper than humans, then trying to collect money from “customers” becomes obsolete at some point. As soon as the army of robots can produce what their owners need, including more robots, there is no reason to pay back any original investors, or to try to become “profitable”.

We have already seen how normal “consumers” have become irrelevant as customers, we have seen how “retail brokerage” customers have become irrelevant as “investors”, and the next stage has already begun, where the world economy is shaped to address the needs of AI/robots, not the needs of puny humans.

Has Meta ever done anything that paid off?

By thecombatwombat • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

I don’t mean this as an easy dunk, I really want to know if anyone can think of any counterpoints. I mean they have to exist right?

It really seems to me that Meta, and by extension Zuck, are the worst tech company and CEO of all time, propped up by a money machine they arguably fell into by accident.

But think about it, their only successes since Facebook itself, are just having cash first and buying their competitors.

Otherwise:
- their mobile efforts were basically a failure, but they bought Instagram
- their “pivot to video” was a money losing joke
- within that, remember when they wanted to be Twitch? That was a thing for a while.
- their messaging never really succeeded despite basically starting with the market cornered, but they bought WhatsApp
- where’s Farmville today? they were supposed to become an app platform. That was a thing.
- they were going to be the world’s ISP for a while, seriously, does anyone even remember that? Starlink broke them.
- and of course, The Metaverse is arguably the single biggest failure any big tech company has ever done

So seriously, am I missing any? Like Google is similar, but they birthed Chrome, gmail, Android, there are big wins among their failures. Meta . . . only misses.

Even if there are AI winners, it’s just really difficult to imagine Zuck ultimately doing anything other than taking billions from his ad business and setting them on fire. But maybe the next $100 billion they burn will pay off, it kind of feels like they have to succeed eventually.

Re:Never held accountable

By SoftwareArtist • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

When someone has created a successful product, they usually think it’s because they’re smarter than other people, and they’re usually wrong.

Facebook is the only really successful product Zuckerberg has ever created. It succeeded because he was in the right place at the right time, and that doesn’t happen very often. All of Meta’s other major products are things they bought instead of building themselves. His attempts to build other things from scratch have mostly failed.

He decided “the metaverse” was the future of computing, just as everyone else was embracing AI as the future of computing. If he weren’t the founder and single largest shareholder, that would have gotten him fired.

Ironically, Quest is actually the most popular platform for VR gaming. If he’d been content just to create a gaming platform, it would be considered a success. Instead he blew $80 billion trying to turn it into the future of computing, making it a massive failure.

Re:No

By allo • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Time is on their side, if they survive for long enough.

Hardware gets better. Models still get smaller. Inference gets optimized. Overall the cost per token (measure it how you want, dollar, electricity, compute, they are all proportional) is going down. The cost the usual customer who wants to ask the AI for a cake recipe is willing to pay stays the same and also the cost the high-paying customers (science, etc.) are willing to pay stays the same when the model quality keeps increasing at the current pace.

So currently they are not competing for dollars per token, but for building a customer base, which will pay off the investment later when it becomes easier to amortize model training. That’s a bet that can fail for some companies, but can be subsided for others (like GAFAM). The big question is what happens with OpenAI and Anthropic. OpenAI will be bought by Microsoft before they fail (Microsoft already announced such things). For Anthropic it isn’t that clear, but on the other hand they are currently in a good position not to fail. I would also not bet against OpenAI, if they don’t do something stupid.

The third thing is API integration. You already names the per-token pricing schemes. While the “Once per week a cake recipe” customer paying $20 is fine, the website paying $20,000 per week in API tokens is more important to keep as customer. The website owner on the other hand is best kept by providing them a free or cheap plan for asking for cake recipes so they don’t test the competition’s model.

Vintage AMD R600 Graphics Driver Sees Code Cleanups Thanks To GitHub Copilot

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot
Phoronix reports:
The AMD R600 Gallium3D driver saw 59 commits [last] Sunday to Mesa 26.2. Making this code restructuring and code cleaning all the more notable is that the improvements to this old AMD Radeon graphics driver was done in part by GitHub Copilot.

Gert Wollny has been among the few open-source developers left working on the AMD R600g driver that covers from the Radeon HD 2000 series through Radeon HD 6000 series graphics cards… [T]he old open-source GPU driver support is being assisted by AI long after the upstream vendor has stopped working on this driver — the Radeon HD 2000 “R600” series launched in 2007.

AI has no value my ass!!!

By williamyf • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Linus Torvalds, Greg H-K and the Mozilla team are singign the praises on AI for software maintenance. And now a 19 year old FOSS grapghics driver is still getting software improvements thanks to AI!

And yet some zealots are saying that AI has no use whatsoever…

You know what? More than one thing can be true at once.

Yes, is true that AI is not a panacea that will replace every single coder/white collar job.

Yes, is true that judiciously used, AI can be extremely useful for many task inside many a job description, including sw development.

The world is not black and white, or even shades of gray, at least for an electronics engineer like me is not only in technocolor, but in even more wavelenghts, and polarized horizontally, vertically and elliptically to boot :-P

Re:Who’s running this hardware

By leonbev • Score: 4, Informative Thread

If you’re not gaming, those old Radeon HD graphics cards are perfectly functional as a basic display adapter. You really don’t need more than that if you’re spending all your time in Firefox doing basic web browsing, office work, and watching stuff on the Tube sites.

So the newest GPUs run LLMs instead of graphics…

By ffkom • Score: 3 Thread
… while the people interested in better graphics cannot afford to buy a newer GPU to do so, because the newer GPUs are busy improving the driver for their old GPUs. What an irony!