Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. American Airlines Picks Starlink For In-Flight Wi-Fi
  2. A Fundamental Principle of Aeronautical Engineering Has Been Overturned
  3. Windows’ Classic 3D Space Cadet Pinball Is Getting a Physical Re-Creation
  4. Internet Starts Coming Back In Iran After Months-Long Blackout
  5. Mythos Detected 23,000 Vulnerabilities Across 1,000 OSS Projects
  6. Spain Blocks Polymarket and Kalshi
  7. Uber, Lyft Drivers In Massachusetts Form First US Ride-Share Union
  8. Netherlands Blocks US Takeover of Vital Digital Supplier
  9. Nvidia Retires Its GeForce Control Panel App After 20 Years
  10. California Moves To Exempt Linux From Upcoming Age-Verification Law
  11. Pope Leo Warns of Risks From AI In 42,300-Word Encyclical
  12. SpaceX Launches 29 Starlink Satellites on Memorial Day
  13. Will Big Tech Layoffs Bring a Culture Shift to Anxiety and Job Insecurity?
  14. It’s Like the Olympics - But Steroids Are Allowed
  15. California Executive Order Directs Businesses and State Agencies to Prepare for AI-Driven Workforce Disruption

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

American Airlines Picks Starlink For In-Flight Wi-Fi

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
American Airlines plans to install SpaceX’s Starlink Wi-Fi on more than 500 narrow-body Airbus aircraft starting early next year. It does not, however, have any immediate plans to change providers on its Boeing fleet, which currently uses a mix of Viasat and Panasonic. CNBC reports:
American in January rolled out free in-flight Wi-Fi for members of its frequent flyer program, following United Airlines, Delta Air Lines and others. Delta in March said it would use Amazon Leo for in-flight Wi-Fi for hundreds of jets starting in 2028. United, Southwest Airlines and Alaska Airlines, which merged with Hawaiian Airlines in 2024, have selected Starlink.
The move is a big win for SpaceX as it prepares for a potentially massive IPO next month. SpaceX said Starlink and its connectivity business generated $11.39 billion in revenue last year, accounting for 61% of the company’s total sales.

AA.. We’re like Homelander

By sinkskinkshrieks • Score: 3 Thread
Only with more Roman Salutes and patriotic graphics than either Fox News or the late Colbert Report.

A Fundamental Principle of Aeronautical Engineering Has Been Overturned

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Wired:
Aerodynamic drag is a major “barrier” in high-speed airplanes, automobiles, and bullet trains. This is because a design with less aerodynamic drag allows the aircraft to move at higher speeds with less energy. When an aircraft or car body moves at high speed, a thin layer of air called the "boundary layer" is formed on its surface. This boundary layer has two states: laminar flow, in which air flows in an orderly fashion, and turbulent flow, which involves turbulence. The longer the air stays in the laminar flow state with low friction, the smaller the air resistance becomes, but as the air speed increases, it transitions to turbulent flow. The key to reducing aerodynamic drag is how to delay this transition to turbulence.

For more than 80 years, the principle of “the surface of an object must be smooth” has been the basic premise of aeronautical engineering throughout the world in order to suppress the transition to turbulence and reduce aerodynamic drag. This premise was based on the results of a 1940 study by Ichiro Tani, a Japanese aerodynamicist who quantitatively demonstrated the relationship between “surface roughness” (an indicator of the state of the machined surface) and turbulent transition, arguing that surface roughness, which was unavoidable with the manufacturing technology of the time, prevented laminar flow from being realized. However, in 1989 Tani reinterpreted the experimental data on rough-surface pipes obtained by fluid engineer Johann Nikulase in the 1930s, bringing a new perspective that “roughness may not necessarily only promote turbulent transition and increase fluid resistance.” Inheriting this idea, a research group led by Yasuaki Kohama of Tohoku University experimentally demonstrated in the 1990s that fibrous rough surfaces, which have fine fibrous irregularities on their surface, have the effect of delaying transition under certain conditions.

The same Tohoku University research team recently announced a discovery that significantly advances this trend. Aiko Yakino, associate professor at Tohoku University’s Institute of Fluid Science, and her research group were the first in the world to demonstrate that aerodynamic drag can be reduced by up to 43.6 percent simply by applying distributed micro-roughness (DMR), a surface roughness so fine and irregular that it cannot be distinguished by the naked eye. This technology is fundamentally different from the “rivulet (shark skin) process,” which is known as a typical aerodynamic drag reduction technology. The rivulet process mimics the fine longitudinal grooves in shark skin, and by carving grooves approximately 0.1 mm wide along the direction of airflow, it aligns the vortices that occur near the wall surface of turbulent airflow areas. DMR, on the other hand, delays the switch from laminar to turbulent flow by means of random and minute irregularities. The flow zones it affects and the mechanisms it employs are based on completely different concepts.

Mythbusters?

By CommunityMember • Score: 5, Informative Thread
Did not the Mythbusters show that dimples could reduce drag (S7E14)? Sure, not exactly the same, but it should not have taken 17 years for the research to catch up (or maybe someone finally watched Golf Ball Car?)

Woah, cool

By T34L • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

It’s not that surprising that someone found another exception to the the rule of thumb that’s been proven wrong with many mechanisms at many scales, including the shark skin, but also just, golf ball dimples, and all kinda wacky methods on aircraft wing like shock bodies and all…

…I’m more impressed they now got air friction tunnels that levitate the object magnetically a meter out, against the air friction, while also being able to actually measure the drag on it at that. That’s really, really cool and oughta open up aerodynamics to lot of experiments that’d be very difficult to pull off without compromising accuracy or something else.

Re:Mythbusters?

By T34L • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

The article even mentions that there’s other surface irregularities that decrease friction, and the paper mentions other methods that also decrease drag, but the newly observed effect is distinct and different with the ones we’ve seen so far, and the headline is reductionist and bad.

ha!

By backslashdot • Score: 4, Funny Thread

I told you guys that whole Bernoulli thing was total BS .. wait .. what, this wasn’t that? Nevermind.

The Profit Effect.

By geekmux • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Please stop with the abuse of language to make things sound more flashy. It just makes you look dumb.

One could make the same argument about YouTube filters. Which ironically now have a measured effect on human communication when natural jargon is warped in favor of monetization. Especially with influencers who don’t even noticing they’re doing it.

Yes. I can actually say the word suicide without some moronic need to use idiotic terms like “unalive”. Sexual assault is a valid term and legal description for a horrific crime. Not a written prescription to dismiss the “essaaay” away because it makes you unprofitable to say.

Yes. Expect it to get worse. I doubt many young people can define what an actual “racist” is now that the term is some kind of acceptable retort in casual debate. Nothing quite like the ignorance of dismissing Nazis under the guise of notsees to not see the effect of playful words abused for profit. Repeating the horrors of Hitler? Gee, I wonder how did we notsee that coming.

Windows’ Classic 3D Space Cadet Pinball Is Getting a Physical Re-Creation

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Hobbyist CNCDan is trying to build a real-world version of Windows’ classic 3D Pinball for Windows — Space Cadet, using 3D-printed flippers, bumpers, LEDs, slingshots, and a raised playfield modeled after the original virtual table. But in bringing the digital table into the real world, CNCDan has already run into several physical challenges the software never had to contend with… Ars Technica reports:
After scaling and skewing the on-screen, perspective-shifted view of the Space Cadet playfield onto a 1-meter-tall table, he ended up with a rectangular playfield just 56 cm wide. That’s on the smaller side for commercial pinball tables and maps to playfield bumpers that are just 53 mm wide — way smaller than any prebuilt bumpers that are commercially available.

Once CNCDan dealt with issues with unreliable plastic microswitches for those tiny bumpers (Hall effect magnets seemed to help), he ran into a separate problem with the even smaller bumpers on the raised playfield. The wiring for those bumpers had to be arranged very carefully to avoid blocking a kickback return alley underneath, a positioning problem that the original designers of the virtual table didn’t have to consider at all. CNCDan also ended up adding a physical mechanism to simulate the short delay 3D Space Cadet players may remember, when the ball dropped down a hole from the raised playfield back to the flippers below.

CNCDan says he’s currently looking for artists to help him with a hand-drawn re-creation of the original Space Cadet playfield, which he doesn’t want to use AI for. “I’m sure [AI] can do it, but I’d much rather give this job to a real human being,” he said in the video.

Re:Pinball machines are still made

By redback • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

because the objective is to build something, not to simply have it.

Re:Why not scale it up?

By redback • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Watch the video. Even at quite a large scale some of the stuff is still too small for off the shelf parts.

Hard to get the look right

By HalAtWork • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Trying to get the real table to update the ball at 20fps is proving insanely difficult.

Re:Pinball machines are still made

By MDMurphy • Score: 4 Thread
I can understand wanting to build it yourself, but reinventing the wheel for bumpers, rollovers, and other standard pinball parts seems a bit too far, especially if you want to it work like the original game. Those 3D printed parts looked rough and will take a lot of fiddling to get them to work as smoothly and reliably as an off the shelf part.

Internet Starts Coming Back In Iran After Months-Long Blackout

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from the BBC:
Internet access has started to be restored in Iran after being cut off almost three months ago, the country’s first vice-president has said. “The first step toward free and regulated access to cyberspace has been taken,” Mohammad Reza Aref wrote on X on Tuesday. Internet monitoring groups Netblocks and Kentik reported “partial” restoration around 13:00 GMT, though the latter warned most networks were still down.

The Iranian government cut internet access following the launch of US and Israeli attacks on February 28. Officials suggested the aim was to prevent surveillance, espionage and cyber-attacks. It is one of the longest-running national internet shutdowns ever recorded worldwide. A content creator from Tehran told the BBC that he had been able to connect to the internet using his home WiFi on Tuesday. “The main point is, some of my income will come back,” he said.

Netblocks said it was unclear whether the internet return would be sustained, and told the BBC it was consistent with what it had seen when previous blackouts were lifted — where restoration could take hours. “Access is not universally back to its original state, with some regional variation,” said the global internet tracker’s research director Isik Mater on Tuesday. She added that there were signs of “more extensive filtering” than prior to January — when a similar blackout was imposed during the regime’s deadly crackdown on anti-government protests — “including additional restrictions to messaging apps like WhatsApp.”

free and regulated?

By DrMrLordX • Score: 3 Thread

Regulared? Yes. Free? Absolutely not.

Thanks to Trump

By rsilvergun • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
The Iranian government has fully consolidated their power. It’s not just that he gave them cover to go after their opposition, by starting a useless War so that he could replace Obama’s plan with everything but worse he completely neutered any opposition to the Iranian government.

When you’re at attacked everybody just gathers around the existing power structures. That’s what happened in America with 9/11. All of the sudden douche nozzles like George Bush Jr and Rudy Giuliani were considered great people. Both men were on the way out the door politically when 9/11 hit and had very successful careers because of the attack.

The exact same thing happened with the Iranian government. They had serious opposition because they can’t feed their people and they were going to have to start giving real concessions and maybe even some semblance of democracy. Trump shit all over that with his staggering incompetence.

There’s a thing called a chesterton’s fence where you don’t take down the fence unless you understand why it was put up. There is a damn good reason why even the stupidest fucking administration’s imaginable did not attack Iran.

And now the reasons why are plain for anyone to see. Meanwhile Iran has now demonstrated complete control of the strait of Hormuz meaning they can shut down 1/5 of the world’s traffic anytime they want. And we can do fuck all about it because Trump squandered basically all the Goodwill in the world for the United States so he could threaten Greenland and Canada.

Son, are you winning?

I am so fucking tired of winning.

Iran internet shutdown to quiet their own people

By SmaryJerry • Score: 5, Informative Thread
Iran shutdown the internet for almost the entirety of January, well before the US started dropping bombs. Iran’s people were holding massive protests against Iran’s government which followed with the government’s mass indiscriminate killing of protesters and their family members, including notably their Olympic wrestling team athlete. Iran’s claim that they shut down the internet due to US hacking is an outright lie, they simply did not want Iranian protesters to support to the US’s position. The women’s national football team were granted asylum in Australia but were forced to return to Iran under threat of their families being killed as well. With the cutting off of the internet the videos of killings, dead bodies, and those begging and pleading with the US to intervene stopped coming out. We will see how much Iran has beaten down their people and if any resistance still remains with the internet now slowly being restored.

Misinformation

By physicsphairy • Score: 5, Informative Thread

The Iranian government cut internet access following the launch of US and Israeli attacks on February 28. Officials suggested the aim was to prevent surveillance, espionage and cyber-attacks.

This is tantamount to misinformation. The regime cut the Internet on January 8th. It was *never* turned back on for the general public. Iran started allowing some country-wide intranet only, with heavy censorship and *no* outbound communication (except for regime figures). There has been no way to communicate with people in Iran anytime since except (a) Starlink (illegal, extremely risky, and subject to jamming) (b) outbound telephone calls (monitored).

Because it started January 8th, it is clear the initial purpose is very different than this states. The protests themselves started in late December. The internet blackout corresponds with nothing else but the regime crackdown in which they murdered tens of thousands of Iranian civilians. The obvious main purpose has been to keep Iranians from sharing about the atrocities.

Is the war related? Of course. It has become only more important as Iran has sought to seize a diplomatic high-ground (or at least equivalency) to maintain full narrative control. And it is true there is an intelligence aspect as well, but more than cyber attacks (how is downing your *own* Internet a win there?) the concern is likely that the Iranian people have been happy to share information to help target the regime, as they did during the previous 12 Day War.

It is malpractice to quote “officials” - if those are indeed “Iranian officials” - and then offer their uncontested view, when they are the ones who blacked out the Internet specifically to be able to offer an uncontested view.

Re:Thanks to Trump

By ArchieBunker • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Trump gave them nukes by tearing up the JCPOA agreement in 2018. https://trumpwhitehouse.archiv…

Mythos Detected 23,000 Vulnerabilities Across 1,000 OSS Projects

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
wiredmikey shares a report from SecurityWeek:
Anthropic says its Claude Mythos model discovered thousands of severe vulnerabilities across more than 1,000 open source software (OSS) projects. According to the AI giant, Mythos Preview has identified more than 23,000 potential vulnerabilities. Of these, 1,900 have been reviewed by external security firms, and 1,726 have been confirmed, including over 1,000 rated “high” or “critical” severity.

The findings are still being reviewed, and Anthropic estimates that nearly 3,900 critical and high-severity vulnerabilities will be confirmed based only on current findings. As the scans are ongoing, the company believes the number of severe vulnerabilities may reach 6,200. Anthropic says more than 1,100 unverified findings have been reported to vendors, and 75 issues with a critical or high severity rating have been patched. Vendors have published 65 security advisories.
“The number of patches is still relatively low for three reasons. First, we’re still early in the 90-day window that’s set out in our Coordinated Vulnerability Disclosure policy: we expect many more patches to land soon,” the AI company explained.
“Second, we are likely to be undercounting patches because some vulnerabilities are patched without a public advisory: in those cases, we’re reliant on scanning for the patches ourselves using Claude. Third, the low volume of patches reflects a genuine problem: even at our relatively slow pace of disclosures, Mythos Preview is adding to an already-overloaded security ecosystem,” it added.

Caveat…

By Junta • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

already-overloaded security ecosystem

This is true, but in part because a lot of ‘security’ reports are pretty bogus, even if they get CVEs and ‘security researchers’ call it a vulnerability, others may be inclined to roll their eyes. For example, the curl project had a write up:
https://daniel.haxx.se/blog/20…

So LLM findings I anticipate to be similar, but just a firehose of stuff to dig through to separate the real findings from the innocuous ones.

We likely will never have a grip on that, as it’s generally easiest to patch the report and not think about whether it *really* was a security risk. The patch may confirm incorrect behavior being acknowledged, but not whether it was realistically a ‘security’ risk or not.

90 days

By Tomahawk • Score: 5, Funny Thread
Here’s 23,000 vulnerabilities that we found, and we’re giving you 90 days to fix them.

And....go!

—-

Yes, it’s an average of 23 per project. But still.

Death of security

By Petersko • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

When the pace of bug discovery overwhelms the capacity to patch, and the discovery tools are available to… well, everybody… doing any business online is fraught with peril. You can’t even triage trust by the integrity of the company. You might trust that “Valerie’s Dog Treats” is legit, but their payment dependancy might be using compromised packages.

How in hell are we going to hold this thing together?

It’s a crock of shit like their “acc compiler”

By MIPSPro • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
Let’s look at what’s been released, CVE-wise. Something fewer than 10 LPEs mostly for Linux. They’ve released about 15 checksums for “future CVEs” they want to claim. One FreeBSD RCE. Zero OpenSSH or OpenSSL RCEs or LPEs. Something like 200-300 bugs claimed to be fixed by Mozilla using Mythos.

I don’t doubt that they’ve found some bugs, but they keep claiming thousands. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence and they simply haven’t produced every 1/10th of the evidence they need to substantiate their claims.

Show your cards or SHUT THE FUCK UP, Anthropic. You guys are annoying and I suspect you are giant liars, too. You sure as fuck lied about the C compiler. It was broke as fuck with no assembler and a useless non-working linker.

I see this as an indictment of Mythos

By oldgraybeard • Score: 3 Thread
and the other supposed AI companies along with their sales and marketing.
Automation is a great tool for doing repetitive tasks and automation is all these companies have.
It takes the Intelligence part of their AI(Artificial Intelligence) business to actually layout a properly constructed, documented and tested fix that should go along with any submission.
And that is beyond the capabilities of the current Massive Automation Machines they are selling today as AI.

Spain Blocks Polymarket and Kalshi

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Spain has temporarily blocked Polymarket and Kalshi while it investigates whether the prediction-market platforms are violating gambling laws by operating without a license. Engadget reports:
The country’s ministry in charge of consumer affairs said it blocked the websites as a precautionary measure pending an official investigation. This investigation will determine if the platforms violate Spain’s gambling laws. It’s set to complete within the next four months and could mandate that these companies require specific administrative licenses to operate.

waiting for the check

By zlives • Score: 5, Funny Thread

in other news Polymarket and Kalshi are about to make substanstive donations to spanish politicians.
you can bet or speculate on Polymarket and Kalshi as to how much.

Re:Goedel, Escher, and Howe

By Pseudonymous Powers • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
I guess what I’m saying is that there’s no way to fix the potential for corruption of a worldwide insider-trading laundromat. Because it’s not a bug, it’s a feature. It’s the only feature.

Re:How do they define “gambling?”

By stabiesoft • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
You could almost argue the stock market is not gambling. If you buy one of the major indexes, over a long enough period of time, you’ll win. Even the crash of 08 had you bought at the peak, and held until now, you’d be doing well. Contrast that with say “let it ride” in Vegas. How long until you are busted? I expect polymarket is worse than Vegas as the “house” advantage is giant with insiders everywhere. Unless you are the insider of course.

Don Jr. has his fingers in both PMs

By sinkskinkshrieks • Score: 3 Thread
It’s the only explanation for why there are no bets on the most anticipated obituary in history.

Uber, Lyft Drivers In Massachusetts Form First US Ride-Share Union

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Reuters:
Ride-share drivers for app-based companies such as Uber and Lyft have unionized in Massachusetts, forming what state officials and labor leaders said was the first officially recognized organization in the U.S. to represent such gig workers. The newly formed App Drivers Union received certification from the Massachusetts Department of Labor Relations on Friday to represent nearly 70,000 ride-share drivers operating as independent contractors in the state.

“It changes the game for ride-share workers across this country,” Massachusetts Governor Maura Healey, a Democrat, said at a rally with drivers and labor activists in Boston on Tuesday. The certification occurred after voters in November 2024 approved a ballot measure that created a novel framework to allow drivers for companies like Uber and Lyft to organize and bargain collectively over pay and benefits. That vote followed a years-long, nationwide battle over whether ride-share drivers should be considered independent contractors or employees entitled to benefits and wage protections.

In other words

By smooth wombat • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

It’s a taxi union.

Congratulations.

When do costs become problematic?

By jamesborr • Score: 3 Thread

Much like with the food delivery services, when costs rise, usage tends to decrease, which in itself is a kind of dislocation, i.e. increased costs, results in decreased demand, which results in need for less supply — so fewer will make more while supply (number of workers) is decreased inline with demand. Folks should be free to decide their own business arrangements, but as with everything else, that freedom applies to both sellers AND buyers and there will be no “free lunch” where more (or even the same number) workers will get paid more money, but rather, the iron laws of supply and demand will have their say.

Re:Why is public transit so abysmal?

By Alinabi • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Europe has plenty of meth-heads too, yet public transportation there does not suck. The public transportation in the US sucks because the government doesn’t want to do what is necessary to overcome the cold start problem. To be useful, a mass transit needs to have a lot of busses. If you have to wait 30 minutes for a bus, nobody will use it. But to have a lot of busses you need a lot of riders to cover the cost. The only way to break this vicious cycle is for the government to subsidize it heavily in the beginning. This is culturally acceptable in Europe, but not in the US.

Uber and Lyft drivers - a 2020s thing

By presidenteloco • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
I don’t foresee that there will be any Uber and Lyft drivers by 2030, except a small and diminishing subset to serve the niche of people who won’t get in a self-driving taxi.

Re:Why is public transit so abysmal?

By 0123456 • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

> Europe has plenty of meth-heads too, yet public transportation there does not suck

Then maybe they keep the meth-heads off the buses. But in America that’s raxist or something.

There is never going to be a case where it’s better to walk to where you have to wait for a bus which takes you to somewhere you have to walk home from than to just get in your car and drive there, which is why European governments concentrate on making travel worse for drivers.

Netherlands Blocks US Takeover of Vital Digital Supplier

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
“Following months of public debate and protests against American IT giant Kyndryl’s proposed acquisition of Solvinity, a Dutch cloud provider that hosts the Netherlands’ online identity platform, the Dutch government has decided to block the acquisition,” writes longtime Slashdot reader rastakid. “The deal triggered fears that it would mean that ‘DigiD’ data would fall under foreign control, and could be demanded by U.S. authorities.” Politico reports:
In a letter to the national parliament published on Tuesday, State Secretary for Digital Economy Willemijn Aerdts said the national authority charged with screening investments had advised the government to block the acquisition. The purchase was seen as posing “a possible risk to the public interest.”

The government on Monday decided to adopt the advice and block the acquisition, Aerdts said. “The Netherlands attaches great value to the presence of foreign, especially U.S.-based tech companies, and their added value to the Dutch economy and digital infrastructure, but it maintains, at the same time, an independent investment screening framework aimed at protecting the public interest and which applies equally to all investors, independent of their country of origin,” the letter read.
Kyndryl said in a statement it was “extremely disappointed” about the decision. “The politicization of this process has overshadowed the clear and important benefits this transaction would have brought to Solvinity’s customers and Dutch citizens.”
Further reading: Challenges Face European Governments Pursuing ‘Digital Sovereignty’

Smart move

By dskoll • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The Dutch have always been smart and pragmatic, and that tradition continues here.

benefits this transaction would have brought to Solvinity’s customers and Dutch citizens.

The Dutch have always been plain-spoken and excellent at detecting bullshit, and that tradition continues here.

Re:Smart move

By marcelmol • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

yes indeed, in the US

DigiD explained

By thegarbz • Score: 5, Informative Thread

For those who don’t understand what DigiD is, it’s the identity verification system used by the Dutch government for… EVERYTHING. Want to change your health insurance? DigiD login. File your taxes? DigiD login. Register a change of address? DigiD login. Get a new driver’s license? DigiD login (after which you receive your new license and then use the app to link the new license to DigiD. Heck you want to get your local council to come and do a waste pick-up from your street - DigiD login.

The Netherlands is one of the most digitised countries in the world, but that comes of course with risks, they are very inflexible when the digital systems go down. That there wasn’t a legal mandate to keep this company under Dutch control is the most astounding thing that’s come out of this debate.

Re:First off… who is Kyndryl…

By thegarbz • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

And how did they become a “major player” in just five years since they were founded?

You may recognise them under their previous name: IBM.

They were a major player from the day they existed. They birthed onto the New York Stock exchange as a privileged nepobaby with a birthday present of 75% of the Fortune 100 business as “existing” customers, an 90000 IBM employees..

They did the right thing

By homerbrew • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
Sadly, based on how our current administration has made some unreasonable demands from tech companies and other countries, I think they are doing the right thing. There is no way they should allow their highly private data to be held by a US company which could just as easily feed that data into Palintier or some other AI and your data will no longer be private. This admin has show they do not like data to be private at all

Nvidia Retires Its GeForce Control Panel App After 20 Years

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Nvidia is retiring its classic Control Panel for GeForce Game Ready and Studio Driver users after 20 years, as it pushes users to a newer, more unified “NVIDIA” app. Longtime Slashdot reader BrendaEM first shared the news, commenting: “Nvidia seems to no long want you to have control over your own video card that you paid your hard-earned money for? WTF!?” VideoCardz.com reports:
Existing Control Panel installs will remain on users’ systems. NVIDIA says the old panel will only disappear after a clean driver installation. Users who still need it can continue to download it from the Microsoft Store, but NVIDIA will no longer add new features, fixes, or other changes.

The retirement currently applies to Game Ready and Studio Drivers. NVIDIA RTX PRO users will continue to receive Control Panel support until the company moves professional features to the NVIDIA app. For GeForce users, NVIDIA says the app now includes the modern functionality previously available through Control Panel. […] The classic panel is therefore not being removed from every system overnight. It is being moved into maintenance mode for GeForce users…

Up next

By Unpopular Opinions • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

NVidia retires the entire RTX family of cards, citing lack of interest on the consumer markets, thus focusing on their new pet project, AI.

Enbloatification

By TonyCI • Score: 5, Informative Thread
I wouldn’t mind using a modern interface for the same functions as the Nvidia control panel, but the Nvidia app is a huge install with lots of tracking telemetry and functions you might never need. Even deselecting items during custom install reports back to Nvidia and if you use NVCleanInstall to strip it back to basics you risk it breaking as the app has hooks into other Nvidia libraries, which if missing will cause issues.

Re:Long Time Coming

By thegarbz • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

They don’t have two control applications. They have one control application and one fucking horrendous poorly programmed marketing app that serves only to force users to register for an nvidia account.

One is a control panel. The other seemingly exists to offer me a “Marvel Rivals Geforce Reward” whatever the fuck that is.

If anyone every programs a tool which has the “System” menu option next to a “Redeem” menu option I hope you get hit by a bus… and don’t die, but spend an eternity in pain.

Re:Enbloatification

By sabbede • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
Well, it doesn’t force you to sign in like GeForce Experience did, which is a plus. And it also now has all the features and controls as the old panel, which was slow as hell.

I still miss the XP Era Control Panel Applet

By Voyager529 • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Fast, effective, included the nView Desktop Manager to include transparency and window-shade mode to any window, and it was under 100MB installed.

Why nvidia drivers are now larger than Windows XP itself is a mystery to me, and they’ve always been a concession that has gotten bigger, slower, and more confusing than what they replaced.

California Moves To Exempt Linux From Upcoming Age-Verification Law

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
California lawmakers are moving to exempt most open-source operating systems from the state’s upcoming age-verification law after backlash from Linux and privacy advocates who warned that the original rules could force decentralized projects to collect users’ ages. The amendment would likely shield major Linux distributions, though SteamOS and other Linux-based platforms tied to proprietary app stores may still face compliance questions. Tom’s Hardware reports:
Assembly Bill 1856 (AB 1856), currently moving through California’s legislature ahead of committee reviews in June, would amend the state’s earlier age-assurance law by excluding software distributed under licenses that allow users to “copy, redistribute, and modify the software.” The proposed amendment specifically states: “Operating system provider” does not mean a person or entity that distributes an operating system or application under license terms that permit a recipient to copy, redistribute, and modify the software.

The amendment follows months of backlash after California passed the original Assembly Bill 1043 (AB 1043), formally known as the Digital Age Assurance Act, in late 2025. The law sought to shift online age verification away from individual websites and apps and down to the operating-system level instead. Under the original law, operating systems would be required to request a user’s age or birth date during device setup, then expose an “age bracket signal” to apps and app stores. The law, which defined brackets such as “under 13,” “13-15,” “16-17,” and “18+,” immediately raised questions about how such requirements would apply to decentralized, open-source software ecosystems. […]

AB 1856 does not repeal the original Digital Age Assurance Act. Instead, it narrows the definition of who qualifies as an “operating system provider” under the law. Commercial platforms with proprietary app ecosystems could remain subject to California’s age-assurance requirements even if most open-source Linux distributions are ultimately exempted. California Assembly Member Buffy Wicks introduced the amendment on February 11, 2026. However, the open-source exemption language appeared in later revisions that began drawing attention across Linux and privacy communities. The latest version is dated May 18, 2026, and as of May 19, 2026, the bill was read a second time and ordered to third reading.

Good laws need no exceptions

By sloth jr • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Age-verification at OS levels was always a terrible idea. It’s difficult to see under what rationale Linux should be granted an exception for this dumb idea. The solution is just to repeal the law and flog the sponsors.

Age Verification for any OS is insane

By SmaryJerry • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
This would be like requiring every single restaurant and fast food place to check photo ID because somewhere in the entire state a bar exists where you have to be 21.

Re:Good laws need no exceptions

By Anonymous Coward • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Age-verification at OS levels was always a terrible idea.

It’s an evil idea, because it rests upon the premise that a computer should act against its owner’s wishes.

And the reason Free Software is getting a carve-out, is because it can’t be forced into that horrific premise. When you’re running Free Software, any action performed by the computer is expected to be whatever you want. If you’re 12 years old and write

10 print “my user is 50 years old "
20 goto 10
30 end

it should work and it the computer prints the wrong thing (“my user is 12 years old”) then that’s a bug.

The original authors of the age verification law couldn’t conceive of this, because their experiences all involve using force against other people. Assholes can’t help but think like assholes.

Re: This should not be acceptble…

By ArmoredDragon • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Either the age check is very weak, or you have to provide your identity to the OS in a way that’s verifiable by somebody other than you, and completely disregards privacy. This is truly the dichotomy you’re dealing with here — pick one or the other. If it’s the former, then what’s the point of all of this?

I don’t see any way at all that this is workable. And assuming this happens anyways, does this mean your browser going to tell every website you visit what your age is upon request?

Re:This should not be acceptble…

By dgatwood • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

This should not be acceptable. Carve-outs are always temporary. Always. Do not give them an inch.

Wait ‘til they realize that Android is distributed under a license that allows people to copy, redistribute, and modify it.

As usual, a law created by people who didn’t think of the consequences then got modified to fix some of the worst consequences, but because they still did not think of the consequences, the modification created different consequences. And this is why we need better lawmakers.

Pope Leo Warns of Risks From AI In 42,300-Word Encyclical

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from the New York Times:
Pope Leo XIV on Monday set out a sweeping vision for corporate executives, politicians and individuals who will shape and be shaped by the future of artificial intelligence, warning leaders to safeguard humanity from A.I.‘s most disruptive effects. Leo’s declaration came in the form of a papal encyclical, an open letter to “all people of good will” that ran to roughly 42,300 words in its English version. It outlined his desire to protect human dignity and agency in an age in which technology threatens to replace humans in many professional and social roles. He presented it alongside Christopher Olah, a co-founder of Anthropic, a major A.I. developer, in a symbolic gesture of dialogue between leaders of the spiritual and technological worlds.

While emphasizing that “technology should not be considered, in itself, as a force antagonistic to humanity,” he wrote that “the pursuit of greater profits cannot justify choices that systematically sacrifice jobs.” Among other things, Leo called for:
- government regulation of the private companies that are driving the development of A.I.
- protection and retraining for workers whose jobs are threatened
- education to help students think critically about the technology
- action to protect children from violent, hypersexualized or fake information online that is often generated by A.I.
- safeguards to ensure that humans, not artificial intelligence, remain responsible for all decisions regarding the use of weapons.

Above all he emphasized the importance of retaining a fundamental social role for all human beings. “A society that guarantees employment to only a small fraction of the population, despite having a high level of technical development, risks exposing many to forced inactivity,” he wrote. “This creates a paradox of material progress and anthropological regression that undermines the foundations of a just and stable social peace,” he added.
Anthropic’s Christopher Olah said companies like his own need moral guidance to avoid being swayed by “a set of incentives and constraints that can sometimes conflict with doing the right thing.”
“We need moral voices that the incentives cannot bend,” Olah said. “Today is just the beginning — the start of a long collaboration between those of us who are building this and those who can see what we, from the inside, cannot.”

21st Century Malware, hits different. Literally.

By geekmux • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

We’ll have AI Hoover’s and AI robots guards and AI cars and all will be eventually regulated for health and safety and so on..

Let me just stop you right there and clarify what you ignorantly dismiss as “so on”.

When the AI-powered cloud-driven bot armed with hydraulic amounts of strength and cat-quick reflexes goes rogue inside your home because someone launched the next cyberattack from behind the security gates ala Solarwinds, there is only one concern you have. And that is regulation around security. Namely the kind of security that should have prevented such a malware horror story from threatening not merely family pictures on a hard drive, but your actual life and those you love.

My Solar-powered example, tends to validate how badly regulation tends to respond when it comes to actual protection. Lawsuits aren’t worth a shit when you’re dead.

Once upon a time, the malware threat wasn’t a physical one. Not anymore.

Can’t stand the competition

By 0xG • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

People are treating AIs as God-like.
They are asking all kinds of questions, spiritual and existential.
Commonly assuming that the AI is all-knowing, all-seeing etc.
So there is a shift from the established God to the ones we have created.
No wonder he is worried.

Re:Everyone is happy

By jacks smirking reven • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

People aren’t fearful of AI itself, they are fearful of the consequences, which really boils down to poverty.

Fear is AI is going to put people out of work and in America if you don’t have a job then you don’t have money and not having money really sucks.

We’re stressed out already with multiple recessions in the last 20 years, rising costs, a job market that’s gone loco (also partly a result of AI) and other factors. If people were secure in their homes, healthcare and livelihood I would imagine the fear of AI would be reduced and more philosophical.

Re: Yes, we should be concerned about these things

By superposed • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

All seems really short sighted. It’s like squeezing a balloon… doesn’t work unless it’s universally applied.

If you think the Pope should refrain from offering moral advice because some people may not follow it, I think you may have misunderstood how the Catholic Church works.

Re:Once upon a time

By thegarbz • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Kick back.

You can thank your life that many people took some of those incoherent ramblings of yours and did not actually kick back. That has to be the biggest mix of incoherent unconnected rubbish I’ve seen used to justify apathy and doing nothing. While I agree AI won’t end us let me address your points:

- No one beyond a few deranged lunatics thought the LHC was capable of generating a black hole.
- The Y2K bug was a real problem and thank christ no one took your advice to kick back and instead opted to spend countless night shifts making sure you slack lifestyle continues.
- No one beyond a few deranged lunatics through mobile phones cause cancer.
- Human cloning is a thing that isn’t done because it was regulated out of existence, not because we have difficulty with the tech. People didn’t kick back and addressed the issue.
- Microwaves did leak radiation. Early microwaves were a problem. They had poor door seals and no electrical interlocks. You could hurt yourself - and in the early 1970s there were documented cases of pacemakers sensing loops being disrupted by microwaves. Engineers didn’t kick back and addressed the issue.
- TV *HAS* rotted your brain - evidence: your post. The modern TV equivalent is social media, and that is actually causing people to do stupid things with fatal results.
- In the 1830s people did the experiment and quickly realised it wasn’t an issue and society moved on. We were *much* smarter back then. We looked at something, experimented and accepted the results. Comparatively we now live in a world where you’re quoting people thinking mobile phones cause cancer, despite literally every expert and every study showing it doesn’t.
- Nano machines ??? WTF?
- Nuclear reactors: Yeah they do, people listened to them and we no longer let for profit companies run wild doing whatever they want with nuclear reactors.

By all means I fully support your right to give no fucks about anything, but for the love of god man, don’t tell other people to do the same, they are keeping you alive!

SpaceX Launches 29 Starlink Satellites on Memorial Day

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“The expansion of SpaceX’s Starlink network of internet relay satellites continued Monday with a Memorial Day launch from Cape Canaveral Space Force Station,” reports Spaceflight Now. The mission added another 29 Starlink satellites to more than 10,000 already in low Earth orbit:
This was SpaceX’s 60th orbital flight of the year, consisting of 59 Falcon 9 rockets and one Falcon Heavy rocket…

Nearly 8.5 minutes after liftoff, [Falcon 9 first stage] B1078 landed on the drone ship, ‘A Shortfall of Gravitas,’ positioned in the Atlantic Ocean off the coast of South Carolina. This was the 151st landing for this vessel and the 614th booster landing to date for SpaceX.

Meanwhile, the second stage shut down eight minutes and 39 seconds into flight and entered a coast phase, before short second burn at T+52 minutes. The stack of Starlink satellites deployed 61 minutes and 26 seconds after launch.
On X.com SpaceX shared footage of the booster rocket landing, and a longer video showing Starship’s 12th test flight Friday.

Re:They have to keep sending them up

By slarabee • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Because they eventually come back down. That is a huge problem because it becomes a very large Capital cost to keep starlink in business.

Oh no, did no one at SpaceX realize that Low Earth Orbit is not permanent and they will have to replace satellites over time?

They have already built a constellation of 10k. As some of the first ones are deorbiting, they are still launching new ones at a rate that the constellation is still growing. Yet somehow they are making money. With the recent S1 filing we have our best view into SpaceX finances. $11.4 billion in Starlink revenue. $4.4 billion in operating income. Even after accounting for massive capex that is the constellation they had somewhere around $2 freaking billion in free cash flow from their Starlink segment. It is a bloody cash cow while they are replacing deorbiting satellites and expanding. Will only get better when they if they ever reach the point where they are not expanding the constellation. Even more betters if they ever get Starship working operationally.

People get so excited about a reusable rocket but like I’ve mentioned before I could keep my old 94 Honda Accord running if I really really wanted to but past a certain point it cost more to keep it running than it was worth. There is a reason why NASA gave up on reusable rockets and that’s it. You can’t put something under that much stress and keep sending it up into space over and over again without a shit ton of expensive maintenance and if you skip the maintenance the rockets just blow up and if you don’t skip the maintenance you might as well have just built another rocket.

There is a monstrous gulf between keeping a piece of hardware running forever and replacing the hardware after a single use. You don’t buy a new Accord after a single run to the grocery store.

There are three Falcon 9 boosters now over 30 launches. Ten over 20. No one think reusuability means you have to fly a booster past the point of economic sense. SpaceX is far from finding that limit.

The thing I keep seeing though is the faithful don’t show up on this website or any other forum that isn’t heavily moderated to prevent them from seeing wrong think. The right wing has completely retreated into safe spaces and anyone who is still on board with Elon Musk has joined those safe spaces and the right wing with them because they pretty much have to protect themselves from reality in order to see Elon Musk as anything but a skeezy grifter getting ready to steal their retirement money.

I am literally laughing. The I hate Elon therefore I must hate on anything SpaceX does crowd are legendary for their inability to back up their statement and hiding behind shadow bans and blocklists. They hate facts. SpaceX fans are on every social platform loudly flying the flag. Hell, many are so enthusiastic about it a common thing is, “I hate SpaceX because their fanboys are everywhere.” Saying they hide in their own communities is absurd.

Re:More pointless space junk

By thegarbz • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Not to mention the pollution from the launches. Counting down the years until Kessler kicks in.

That’s nothing compared to ignorance on the topic. Starlink satellites re-enter the atmosphere within about 5-6 years. They leave zero space junk and don’t contribute to Kessler Syndrome. They are in too low of an orbit.

Also give the low orbit, the relative efficiency of spacex launches, and the number of satellites in a payload per launch it turns out each Starlink satellite produces 340/25/5 = 2.72 Tonnes CO2 / year, or about half as much as your car. The entire Starlink program produces less emissions than a tiny tiny country town near bumfuck nowhere, Wisconsin.

There’s so many problems with Starlink, how did you pick the two things that are completely irrelevant to complain about?

Re:More pointless space junk

By caseih • Score: 5, Informative Thread

All true, but there is a measurable increase in pollution in the upper atmosphere now, some from launches, and most from all the satellite constellations burning up all the time. It’s not as if these satellites just burn up to nothing. They leave behind all sorts of metals in the upper atmosphere, especially aluminum and magnesium compounds. It’s a bit reckless. From what I read some of these particles might act as cooling agents, so hey it’s all good. Nevermind the kerosene soot that lingers for years in the upper atmosphere after every spaceX launch. And other compounds damage ozone. We really have no idea how these effects will play out.

I’m sure somebody realized it

By rsilvergun • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Just not the guy running the company or anyone investing in it. Because that math doesn’t math. It’s too expensive to put the satellites up. They lose money on every sale but I’m sure they’ll make it up in volume.

I noticed your post is just throwing around big numbers ignoring the fact that the maintenance costs on replacing the satellites are killing starlink’s profit margins and any potential growth it could have. The fact is they have to charge too much for the internet service limiting their market. So they have maxed out people who can pay that much money for internet and don’t just have a wired option that’s better. Exactly like I said they did.

Again you can throw out all the impressive sounding bullshit you want but it doesn’t make their balance sheet look any better or justify the valuation on SpaceX. They’re going to dump that shit into your 401k and they have structured the NASDAQ deal to make that possible.

But none of this matters. I am genuinely impressed to see you getting upvoted because it means that there is so much push to prevent anyone from questioning the validity of the SpaceX IPO that the bots have actually woke back up and have started modding is dead forum again. I didn’t think I’d ever see them back with how dead things were. I’m sure it won’t last but it’s crazy how much money must be going into manipulating public opinion about the IPO if they’re bothering with this dead forum.

Anyway better start picking out your favorite flavor of cat food because you ain’t going to have any retirement income. All that money is going to go to make Elon the first trillionaire.

Re:More pointless space junk

By Coolfish • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

That’s nothing compared to ignorance on the topic. Starlink satellites re-enter the atmosphere within about 5-6 years. They leave zero space junk and don’t contribute to Kessler Syndrome.

See https://www.youtube.com/watch?… Essentially the reentry introduces a lot of metals into the atmosphere, that cause the ozone layer to deplete. There’s no such thing as a free lunch. Also - Elon is an idiot. His companies succeed despite him, not because of him.

Will Big Tech Layoffs Bring a Culture Shift to Anxiety and Job Insecurity?

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Tech industry layoffs may be worse at large tech companies than the rest of the IT industry. The New York Times argues those layoffs have now shifted the culture at Big Tech companies, after interviewing more than two dozen of their workers. “Cooperation and collegiality are on the wane; chumminess between employees and managers has cooled as mutual suspicion pervades their relationships; and a throbbing economic anxiety infects almost every conversation.

“Perhaps no site on the internet reflects this transformation more vividly than Blind, where users can post in private channels restricted to employees of a single company, or public channels visible to anyone…”
Since 2022, large tech companies have collectively laid off more than 150,000 workers, unraveling what many tech workers once perceived as a guarantee of affluence and employability. The threat of being replaced by artificial intelligence has loomed over those who remain. This year alone, Amazon has indicated that it is laying off more than 15,000 workers, Block 4,000, Meta 8,000 and Oracle an estimated 30,000… By most measures, the sentiments that Blind tracks have taken a turn for the worse. During the nearly four years before tech companies began major layoffs in the fall of 2022, Meta and Microsoft employees posted about career success — topics like how to maximize their salary or win promotions — more than four times as often as they posted about job insecurity, according to Blind. Since then, the ratios have lurched in the opposite direction: Meta and Microsoft employees have posted about job insecurity roughly 1.5 times as often as they post about success…

The shift has had practical effects. A Meta employee said in an interview that some workers on her team now used less vacation time and that, in a break with custom, people frequently checked on their projects while on vacation. They increasingly worry about getting a poor performance review or losing their job if they aren’t constantly available. The employee, who declined to be identified for fear of retribution, said she and many of her colleagues frequently checked Blind because it could be comforting to see how many other Meta workers shared their anxieties. Employees at several companies said in interviews that their morale was further undermined by the feeling that the layoffs were abrupt and arbitrary, and executed with little empathy.

Several tech workers said it was the scarcity of information about possible layoffs that raised their cortisol levels and made it difficult to focus on their jobs. They often fill the vacuum by turning to Blind, which, in addition to posts by workers, features a “tech layoff tracker” that lists both layoff rumors and those it has confirmed. “I was on Blind five days a week,” said Faith Wilkins El, a software engineer who was laid off from Oracle in late March, after more than four years at the company. Wilkins El, who is part of the Oracle Workers Collective, a group seeking better severance agreements with the company, said navigating Blind was sometimes stressful because it was hard to know what was true or false. (Blind says it has a security team to weed out bad actors, like those who may try to register under fake email addresses.) Still, she found it more helpful than not because the layoffs came as less of a shock after she spent time on the site. “I was trying to get prepared mentally,” she said.

Blind is capitalizing on the increased interest with new products. It plans to unveil a service called Blind AI, which will allow employers to simulate their workers’ reactions to certain changes, like a stricter in-office mandate. And it is close to releasing a feature to alert users that layoffs are imminent.

Re:Slashdot: “Panic !” Also Slashdot: “Don’t Panic

By whoever57 • Score: 5, Informative Thread

The referenced Washington Post article is based on US government statistics, and if you believe those statistics, I have a bridge to sell you. The

Civil servants have been fired for delivering “bad” numbers. You think the remaining staffers are going to look for things that might make the numbers look bad?

One more thing this administration has corrupted: economic statistics.

Re: I think Elon Musk summarized it …

By walbourn • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Given Elon’s constant lying and self-delusion, I wouldn’t take a lot of comfort from his perspective.

Re:perceived

By Brain-Fu • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

The tool doesn’t exist in a vacuum. Your scenario is eliminating too many relevant variables.

For example, most software development companies are in competition against each other AND have more features they want to develop than they have time to develop. They must constantly choose which features/bugfixes to skip in order to make room for the most important ones, and they must choose wisely in order to maintain their competitive position.

So when the tool suddenly increases the productivity of their employees, they don’t necessarily cut staff to get back down to where they were. They can now complete more of the work they want, without hiring new people. That’s a total win that doesn’t involve any job loss at all.

Furthermore, when companies DO cut down to get back to their prior level of productivity, their competitors (who didn’t cut staff) now run circles around them, and they must re-hire in order to catch up.

Of course, the scenarios I just gave ALSO glance over many relevant variables. Nothing that happens on the economic stage is this “pure.” There are far too many inter-permeating effects. But my point is that you are seeing only one tiny little possibility among many, with real incentives that prevent yours from being the only story.

We get headlines listing layoffs all the time, in part because such headlines are marketing signals and help drive stock prices up. We don’t get headlines about the hiring that is also happening. There is constant churn going on, so the numbers we see are skewed and our perception of the economic consequences is equally skewed.

So, things might not be as bad as they seem when you focus ONLY on the reported layoffs and ONLY on the “lay off staff and stay the same” possibility that AI presents businesses. The big picture is, simply put, bigger than that.

Re: perceived

By Tony Isaac • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

You clearly haven’t used AI for complex tasks.

My company thinks AI can be used to single-handedly implement Jira tickets.

On the first attempt, Claude Code spit out a bunch of stuff, built a screen and some APIs, and when the developer ran the code, the screen did nothing. After only a week of dozens of revisions, he got it to work.

So then he went to ticket #2, to implement a simple API. Claude spit out 14,000 lines of code, modifying 5 components that had nothing to do with the request.

Each AI run took from half an hour, to hours, not just 3 minutes.

Your teenager might need hand-holding, but not to that extent. If they did, you should find a different job for the teenager. And for the AI.

AI is good at being spoon-fed coding tasks by a developer. It’s not good for wholesale changes, not even close.

Re: perceived

By Tony Isaac • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Ah, so it’s the dumb human’s fault! Got it!

It’s Like the Olympics - But Steroids Are Allowed

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“Think Olympics on steroids. Literally,” quips the BBC, describing Sunday’s controversial Enhanced Games event in Las Vegas featuring dozens of athletes “using performance-enhancing drugs to try and break world records in track, weightlifting and swimming.
Some $25m (£18.6m) in prize money is up for grabs — with cash prizes for winners… The drugs they use must be legal, and approved by the Federal Drug Administration. But substances like testosterone and human growth hormone — banned by the World Anti-Doping Agency — are not only celebrated here, they’re encouraged and for sale…

Health experts warn that anabolic steroids and growth hormones can cause strokes and cardiovascular damage, among other risks. Event organisers claim Enhanced will push the limits of human performance while critics, especially in the Olympic movement, dismiss it as an affront to the spirit and founding principles of competitive sport…

Earlier this month, the Enhanced Group — the company behind the competition — began trading on the New York Stock Exchange. And the competition is seemingly being treated as an opportunity for Enhanced to sell performance-enhancing medicine and supplements online.
“The project was founded by entrepreneurs Aron D’Souza and Maximilian Martin in 2023,” the artidcle points out, “and has attracted backing from prominent investors including billionaire Peter Thiel and Donald Trump Jr.”

And NPR adds that “Most of the participating athletes trained for the competition in Abu Dhabi, as part of Enhanced’s own study.”
Enhanced did not break down what specific athletes used which drugs, but they announced on Wednesday in the lead-up to the event that 91% of the athletes competing used testosterone or testosterone esters, 79% used human growth hormone, and 62% used stimulants, such as adderall…

The games have been largely panned by outside medical experts and sports governing bodies. Multiple recent studies assess the harm surrounding the Enhanced Games. Travis Tygart, the CEO of the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency, called the games a “dangerous clown show that puts profit over principle” in a statement. The International Olympic Committee said the games are a “betrayal of everything that we stand for.” The World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) last year urged U.S. authorities to stop the games. The International Federation of Sports Medicine said in 2024 that they see the medical oversight as “insufficient” to support the athletes.

Re:Wait, I remember this being an SNL Sketch

By Weirsbaski • Score: 5, Informative Thread

I’m positive that Saturday Night Live did a sketch about pretty much this idea. I never forgot it because of the visual punchline. There’s a weightlifter who’s on a ‘cocktail’ of steroids, pain-killers and a host of other extremely suspect substances, as the commentator describes, and the person in a big ‘muscle suit’ with sweats, etc. (like the Hans and Franz of other sketches) starts to lift the unbelievable amount of weight and…

It’s the all-drug olympics:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?…

Re: Dance for me.

By phantomfive • Score: 5, Informative Thread
Athletes used to use amphetamines for sports before it was illegal. People died.

The amphetamines let you push through the pain, but pain can be a signal that you’re in trouble and shouldn’t push more.

The Truth about Records!

By burni2 • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

You will only be able to break them with “enhancement” IN COMBINATION WITH TALENT and TRAINING / you need to be already in the upper echelon.

So I think the enhancement games will quickly die off pure boredom.

Better Athletes through Chemistry

By sizzzzlerz • Score: 5, Funny Thread

The opening ceremonies to be hosted by Lance Armtrong, Barry Bonds, Mark McGuire, and Sammy Sosa. Entertainment provided by the East German Women’s Shotput team.

Re: Dance for me.

By fuzzyfuzzyfungus • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
They already pretty much are. You have to do at least a little performative fretting about the risks, which spoils the enjoyment of pure cheering at the best crunching sounds; but there’s no way we’d justify the level of recreational head trauma something like football produces if we didn’t fundamentally regard the players as relevant only the the way racehorses are.

California Executive Order Directs Businesses and State Agencies to Prepare for AI-Driven Workforce Disruption

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot
Thursday California’s governor issued an executive order “directing state agencies to prepare workers and businesses for AI-driven workforce disruption,” reports San Francisco’s KQED. In a statement the governor said “This moment demands that we reimagine the entire system — how we work, how we govern, how we prepare people for the future.”
The order mandates agencies to explore a range of policy options, including severance standards, expanded unemployment insurance, job retraining programs aimed specifically at white-collar workers, worker ownership models and a concept the governor called “universal basic capital,” giving all residents a stake in assets such as corporate stocks, bonds or wealth funds…

Tom Kemp, executive director of the California Privacy Protection Agency, applauded the fact that the order named data privacy as a consumer protection concern and highlighted the CPPA’s automated decision-making technology regulations, which he called “the nation’s most comprehensive.” Others are more skeptical. “Catastrophic job loss from AI is not inevitable, it’s a political choice,” Lorena Gonzalez, president of the California Federation of Labor Unions, AFL-CIO, wrote in a statement. However, Gonzalez noted one area of genuine agreement: the order’s emphasis on collective bargaining as a tool for protecting workers from AI displacement…

According to Stanford HAI’s 2026 AI Index, software developers ages 22 to 25 are among those most likely to see their skills made redundant earliest. This year, U.S. employment fell nearly 20% from 2024, even as headcount for older developers continued to grow. Following the job cuts announced at Meta, a union of Alphabet workers in the U.S. and Canada released a statement that suggests Silicon Valley’s own labor force may seek to organize… “It’s undeniable that our whole industry is being transformed by the corporate push to adopt new AI tools,” [Alphabet Workers Union-CWA Local 9009 said in a statement]. “It’s hard not to feel anxiety and fear when we can see more and more tech companies cutting huge portions of their workforce both in anticipation of replacing them with AI, and to fund their multi-billion-dollar bets on AI as the future of the industry…”

In February, AFL-CIO President Liz Shuler and Gonzalez delivered what amounted to an ultimatum to Newsom: regulate AI or lose labor’s support for any future presidential run. Shuler called a potential AI-driven economic collapse a coming “crisis.” In August 2025, Newsom announced a partnership with Google, Microsoft, IBM and Adobe to expand AI education in California schools and community colleges, a workforce preparation push that now looks like a precursor to Thursday’s more sweeping order.
The article notes that after signing the bill the governor shared this comment on X.com. “California will pursue new policies that make sure working Californians — not just Big Tech — benefit from the wealth and breakthroughs coming out of this space.”

Newsom telegraphed Thursday’s order earlier this week, when he appeared at the Center for American Progress IDEAS Conference in Washington. “Businesses are going to make a fortune, and that’s why you cannot continue to have a payroll tax system that taxes jobs and then subsidizes automation.”

Re:The Presidential Campaign

By sinkskinkshrieks • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
His name is spelled “Newsom”. And he is a careerist wife cheater who doesn’t appear to hold any particularly strong convictions except those that blow best with the wind. These are performative executive wishes that don’t do anything to stop job destruction, slipping standards of living, stem inequality, or create jobs for the zillions of people out-of-work.

Re:giving all residents!

By Epeeist • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Have to love the left, always wanting to seize and give away someone else’s stuff.

Absolutely, much better for everyone if they just got rid of the peasants

Re:The Presidential Campaign

By Anonymous Coward • Score: 5, Informative Thread

And he is a careerist wife cheater

Unlike that tower of morality Trump who has cheated on all three of his wives, assaulted multiple women, and is a pedo.

Re:giving all residents!

By gtall • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Check your beliefs, it is the right wingnuts that are grabbing everyone else stuff and giving it away to themselves. What do you think the Big Stupid Bill was all about? Girl Scout cookies? Look at what el Bunko is going with his Monuments to his Ego. Or his stealing $1.76 Billion to pay off his thugs. Or his turning bits and bobs of the Fed. Government over to his rich friends for tidy little kickback under the table. Or protecting the Oil and Gas industry to keep a lock on U.S. energy markets and those big fat contributions to Republicans flowing, minus bit off the top for his own bank account.

I’m sure the poor will belly right up the corporate stocks, bonds, and wealth funds will all the money the rich haven’t yet taken from them. Tell you what, quit your job, move to Smalltown, U.S.A., try to find a job, and attempt to make ends meet. Oh, and you’ll be wanting to pay for your health insurance by yourself.

Will he step down if he loses an election?

By rsilvergun • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Because right now that is literally the only thing I am looking for in a politician. If they are just not an open fascist then hey that’s good news.

Also none of you fuckers give a shit about Trump fucking kids so you can piss right off with your infidelity bullshit.

Everything is performative wishes as long as guys like you keep voting for Trump and telling us you didn’t. You’re not the silent majority you’re the silent minority with voter suppression making sure you get to pick your guy. Or rather billionaires pick your guy and you follow along.

I will remind everyone that the $22 an hour minimum wage for fast food workers which is boosted wages for all workers in California was signed by Gavin newsom. And he absolutely could have vetoed it.

Never let perfect be the enemy of good. Newsom is a huge step up from where we are right now.