Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Microsoft Offers Mass Buyouts For Roughly a Quarter of Its Workforce
  2. Anthropic Files For IPO
  3. Reddit’s Largest Open Source Community Dumbfounded By AI Ban: ‘I Guess Linux Is No Longer Allowed?’
  4. Amazon Deforestation Fell To Lowest Level Since 1988 - And Silva Wins Reelection
  5. Microsoft Announces Open Source Tool Evaluating Your Software’s Optimization For AI Coding Agents
  6. 25% of Incoming Pull Requests May Be AI Slop, Finds Study From Linux Foundation Research
  7. Systemd Merges Support for Rust Programs
  8. AI Use Convinces California Math Professor There’s ‘No Point’ Grading Homework
  9. A Newly Proposed Linux Filesystem Can Fix Corrupted Data
  10. AI Delivers ‘Zero Financial Payoff’ To Most Companies, Economist Says
  11. Google Says Gmail and Photos Data Shared with AI Search Could Be Used for Targeted Ads
  12. Free Software Foundation Hosts Free ‘Encryptfest’ Event on Sunday
  13. As eMudhra Exits Cert Business, Users Face New PKI Trust Decisions
  14. Getty Images Files For US Bankruptcy, Advances Restructuring Plan
  15. Old Blood Cells Have Been Transformed Into Brain Stem Cells That Get Younger

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Microsoft Offers Mass Buyouts For Roughly a Quarter of Its Workforce

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Seattle Times:
Microsoft is offering buyouts to about 60,000 employees, or roughly a quarter of its workforce, as the company tries to control its head count while avoiding layoffs. The Redmond-based tech giant announced Monday morning that eligible employees at the vice president level and below in the U.S., Canada, India and the United Kingdom would receive a “voluntary exit offer” of a standard severance package, based on their location.

In a memo to employees, Microsoft Chief People Officer Amy Coleman said the move was building off the voluntary retirement program earlier this year, which was available to more than 8,700 U.S.-based employees, roughly one-third of whom took the offer. Since May 2025, Microsoft has been trying to reduce its corporate workforce, first through waves of mass layoffs and now through more creative buyout programs. The company laid off about 15,000 employees last year over the course of several months, affecting about 3,200 Washington-based workers.
The report notes that the layoffs have continued this year, though on a smaller scale and largely concentrated in the company’s gaming division.

Quick bit of context

By bmajik • • Score: 3 • Thread

An article says:

>Employees at internal levels 64 and below received one week of base pay per six months of service, for example, and employees at levels 65 to 67 will receive two weeks of base pay per six months of service, according to offers reviewed by Business Insider.

Within MSFT, here’s what those “levels” mean for software dev positions:

68-70: Partner & Above [entirely different comp structure; limited quota]
65-67: Principal
63-64: Senior
61-62: Engineer 2
59-60: Engineer

When I left in 2022, you unofficially had a limited amount of time to make it to the senior band. The “up or out” philosophy very much applied to junior engineers; if you didn’t have the potential to make senior engineer (because you hadn’t made it yet after x years), you were managed out.

People who made it to Principal could park their careers at the principal level and stay there indefinitely, so long as they were providing good results (but were still subject to random layoffs not based on their own performance)

The VEOs and other “voluntary” downsizing plans have been targeting older, higher-level folks. Yes, those folks are more expensive. They are also more male, more American, and more white.

Anthropic Files For IPO

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Anthropic has filed to go public on the Nasdaq under the ticker ANT, setting the stage for a potentially record-setting IPO that could value the Claude developer at more than $2 trillion. Alongside the extraordinary cost of its AI expansion, Anthropic warned that it “may not generate sufficient revenue to achieve or sustain profitability in the future.”

“While we have experienced significant revenue growth in recent periods, our business is highly capital intensive,” the company said. “Our revenue growth may not be sustainable, and our rate of growth may decrease.” NBC News reports:
The filing did not include a potential share price, the number of shares to be offered or a valuation for the whole company, all of which will be determined after Anthropic holds a “road show” with investors, prospective investors and its bankers. […] The company plans to spend at least $110 billion with Amazon for cloud services through April 2036 and another $120 billion with SpaceX through 2029. Anthropic also said it planned to spend $115 billion with Google and $45 billion with Microsoft, both through 2033, for computing infrastructure.

The filing said that the company recorded revenue growth of “1,368% year over year for the three months ended June 30, 2026.” The cost of renting servers and chips grew by 300% over the same period. Anthropic’s net loss for the first six months of 2026 was $80.7 billion. For the entirety of 2025, the company reported a $42 billion net loss.

Anthropic added that it expects its current cash and sales to be sufficient for the next 12 months but warned that future revenue growth depends on a number of important factors, including the cost of infrastructure. As a result, it said, “we may be required to seek additional financing sooner than we currently anticipate.” The company said it has raised about $141 billion of capital through the end of June and is sitting on $112.4 billion of cash.

IPO ~= Rug Pull :: Venture Capital

By JakFrost • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

This IPO is a rug pool by venture capital investment that has already dropped their money into the company for control and now the public will cash them out with the IPO offer.

The debt bagage of this company is just a huge and the possibility of them ever becoming profitable is near impossible since the market is saturated with their competitors, their models are not winning well if anybody else, especially when the competitors like Google and Facebook/Meta and others that are willing to spend even more money who have revenue sources outside of just pure AI token spending.

Even SpaceX can get their money from their internet service order rocket ships or possibly Tesla if they were rich but anthropic is a standalone.

Perhaps this is another Bitcoin or other dot-com company going bust in the near future.

I believe the future will include AI but it will be small models that are self-contained and that people have on their own equipment and not not spending vast amounts of money on paying for tokens to third-party companies.

Patrick Boyle on YouTube does a great job explaining the vastness of the debt along with the Casual Finance channel.

Capturing All Future Value

By Luthair • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
I feel like this is the new trend with venture capital, attempt to capture all future gains at IPO and hope the muppet bag holders believe the hype.

They have to have a stock ticker

By toxonix • • Score: 3 • Thread

If they don’t have public stock, they can’t issue stock options with long end-weighted vesting schedules to dupe employees into thinking they’re getting paid. If 80% of your RSUs vest AFTER you’ve been laid off in the latest round of AI efficiency fires/rehires, the CFO wins again.

Reddit’s Largest Open Source Community Dumbfounded By AI Ban: ‘I Guess Linux Is No Longer Allowed?’

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Kotaku reports:
r/opensource, Reddit’s primary “subreddit for everything open source related,” has banned all AI-assisted and AI-related projects.... As reported by The Verge, the subreddit’s October 24 post, titled “Your tokens aren’t valuable: No more AI,” features four new main rules: all projects must now be at least “1 year old,” have “multiple contributors,” be posted by someone who must “speak English,” and cannot be “made by” or “intended for” AI… [T]he ban on AI is simple; as the subreddit’s moderators explain, “AI, as it exists today, is incongruent to this Open Source community.” Unsurprisingly, this is the part that’s upset the majority of the users in the thread....

[T]he moderator who posted the new guidelines stated in a separate comment that the overwhelmingly negative response is due to “some guy on twitter claiming to be alternative news” who posted an “opinionated editorial pointing hundreds of people to the thread.” Given the timing of when the thread was posted, alongside the fact that the X post in question mentions “the Linux kernel,” they are presumably referring to this post by The Lunduke Journal. The moderator may be correct, as almost all of the top comments on the post are from users who have never posted in r/opensource before.
The use of AI “doesn’t change whether something is open source or not,” complained one commenter, who added “I guess Linux is no longer allowed here? Linus uses AI for kernel development now.”

The moderator has since updated their post to acknowledge that Redditors have now already created a rival community called r/OpenSourceAIAllowed — plus three more alternatives:

AI is just another tool

By dj.delorie • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

In this context, AI is just a compiler that turns human-readable source code into machine-readable code. I mean, gcc does that too. Bison writes C code for you. IDEs help you edit. Spell checkers do your “look in the dictionary” job for you. We’ve had code-generating tools for a long time now, AI is just another one. Today’s programmers are no longer involved in writing assembler, tomorrow’s programmers will no longer be involved in writing C. How many of you can do low-level programming *now* ? How many people *today* write low quality programs with the existing tools?

What’s different now is that AI disconnects you from the resulting logic in a way that previous tools didn’t. Then again, C disconnects you from what the assembler does, just not as much. Python even more so. ESPHome “programs” are just YAML files. This trait enables more people to “write code”, which is good, but increases the amount of bad code as much as it increases the good. We as a coding community need to figure out how to map our ideals and ethics to this new tool. What is “open source” if the compiler is an LLM instead of gcc? What is the source code? How do you reproduce or validate LLM-generated programs? Who will be providing the “core intelligence” that LLMs train on? There aren’t many people who can write or maintain compilers any more, will we have the same problem with AI in the future? How do we recognize the effort, creativity, and authorship that goes in to “programming” with an LLM?

IMHO taking a general “for” or “against” position wrt AI/LLMs is not useful. We should take positions for or against *how* it’s is used, and how we can “use it for good, not evil.” Past generations thought computers were unobtainable magic. Today’s generation has the Internet in its pocket. Future generations will wonder how we luddites survived without AI. It’s up to us to figure out how to get there.

Besides, who doesn’t want a compiler that reads the documentation and helps you write code? ;-)

Well…

By Rosco P. Coltrane • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

My opinion is that AI will kill Linux eventually. Not now, not when Linus uses it, because Linus knows how to code and is careful. But eventually the crappy vibe-coded junk will seep into the kernel. And then you’ll get Microsoft-style code quality issues.

Projects primarily written in emacs not allowed

By LindleyF • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread
Vim only!

Re:Well…

By drinkypoo • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

I think AI copyright is going to kill Linux. Allowing uncopyrightable code into your project could be determined by a court to destroy your whole license, forcing ALL your code to be released as uncopyrightable and putting GPL-licensed code into the public domain where it can be monetized by corporations without having to give anything back. None of this is how copyright law is supposed to work, but if I’ve learned one thing about governments and laws and courts it’s that they often aren’t created for our benefit.

Screw you guys, I’m going home!

By Deathlizard • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

Wolvereness. Hmm. Where have I heard that name before…

Oh yeah…

So not only has he pulled a Cartman on the leading Minecraft mod platform at the time, but now a leading Subreddit as well.

Amazon Deforestation Fell To Lowest Level Since 1988 - And Silva Wins Reelection

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Brazil’s 80-year-old president Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva was re-elected Sunday, reports the Guardian, “defeating his far-right opponent, Flávio Bolsonaro, to claim a historic fourth term in power.”

And the results could impact the climate, suggests the Associated Press, since under da Silva the annual deforestation rate in the Amazon fell to its lowest level since records began in 1988:
Official satellite data showed the rainforest lost 3,335 square kilometers (1,300 square miles) from Aug. 2025 through July 2026, the period used to calculate the annual rate…

During Jair Bolsonaro’s presidency, from 2019 to 2022, Amazon deforestation surged by about 60%, with more than 45,000 square kilometers (17,400 square miles) cleared, according to official data. Under Lula, deforestation has fallen 71% since 2023, the government said. One of Lula’s first moves after taking office in January 2023 for a third, non-consecutive term was to revive the Action Plan for the Prevention and Control of Deforestation in the Legal Amazon, known by its Portuguese acronym, PPCDAm. Launched in 2004 during his first administration, the plan had been shelved under Bolsonaro....

The plan has four pillars: strengthening monitoring and enforcement; promoting a sustainable economy; managing protected areas and determining how undesignated public forests should be used; and using regulations and financial incentives to curb deforestation. Measures included restoring sanctions for illegal forest clearing detected by satellites, a practice seen as the most effective tool to curb deforestation that was halted under Bolsonaro. The government also proposed barring properties with illegal deforestation from receiving bank loans and allocated more funding to priority Amazon municipalities that demonstrated reductions in forest loss. It also funded efforts to fight environmental crime and develop subsidized credit for sustainable businesses in the Amazon…

Deforestation and other land-use changes are Brazil’s largest sources of greenhouse gas emissions, which drive global warming. The stakes are especially high in the Amazon, which stores vast amounts of carbon dioxide and generates atmospheric moisture that helps regulate weather far beyond South America… Degradation from wildfires, logging and drought affects about 40% of the Amazon and has outpaced clear-cutting in recent years. A strong El Niño, a periodic warming of the equatorial Pacific, could intensify those threats in 2026 and 2027 by bringing hotter, drier conditions that fuel wildfires.
The article notes that Lula’s reelection campaign promised zero net deforestation by 2030, plus restoration to offset all forest loss, legal or illegal.

naming!

By nicolaiplum • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

His surname is da Silva so at least get that right. He is always known as Lula, a life-long nickname which is also part of his legal name (since 1982).

Lula won despite US interference

By maladroit • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

US interference in the Brazilian election:

“Inside the Trump-administration campaign to return Brazil’s Bolsonaro clan to power”
https://www.reuters.com/world/…

“Battle over Meta’s alleged Bolsonaro bias intensifies days before Brazil presidential runoff”
https://www.theguardian.com/wo…

Re:Following the Trump playbook

By Anonymous Coward • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

Bolsonaro *led* in the first round, he did not defeat Lula. That’s why there was a second round.

And his lead was only 47% vs 45%. That’s not insurmountable.

Also, there’s a big gulf between refusing to accept the results and ‘some scrutiny’.

Re:Following the Trump playbook

By laughing_badger • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

Not really. It’s not unprecedented elsewhere and Brazil only has about 40 years of events to compare to, which is a small dataset - it was going to happen for the first time at some time.

It’s a pretty standard outcome where you’ve got a candidate where people who don’t like them also don’t agree on what they do want, but are very sure that it’s not them. It looks like people rallied around Da Silva because they absolutely didn’t want Bolsonaro.

The results should certainly be checked in the normal way, but winning the first round and losing the second isn’t a smoking gun. It also depends on what has happened in the news in the meantime.

Re:Following the Trump playbook

By thegarbz • • Score: 4, Informative • Thread

You don’t find it a bit odd that Bolsonaro defeated Lula in the election, but didn’t get 50% of the vote, and then loses in the runoff? That is unprecedented in Brasil. Perhaps it does warrant some scrutiny.

No, that’s not odd at all. Many parts of the world have run-off elections. It concentrates the vote to prevent like parties splitting the community. In many parts of the world these kinds of run-off elections end up flipping the result, it’s a natural result of that election system.

E.g. You have the following parties with the following results:
Right party A - 40% of the vote
Left party A - 31% of the vote
Left party B who is like A but also want to implement policy X - 29% of the vote.

In the runoff now the people who voted for Left party B get to decide, are they hyper focused on policy X to the point where they vote Right wing or abandon the election? In most cases the answer is no, so people who voted for Left party B will vote for Left party A in the run-off and the result flips.

This is perfectly normal for that kind of system and it’s actually bizarre that it hasn’t happened before in a country where a run-off system exists.

Microsoft Announces Open Source Tool Evaluating Your Software’s Optimization For AI Coding Agents

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
The problem? Understanding how AI coding agents interact with the software you build. “Whether you’re maintaining an SDK, building a command-line interface, or publishing an MCP server or skills… you need to understand whether agents can discover and use what you ship, and what your team can change.”

Results can vary, and configurations keep changing, with behaviors influenced by everything from custom instructions and MCP servers to skills and plugins. So after a year of development Microsoft has created Scope, “an open-source platform built on Kubernetes for turning those interactions into evidence product teams can act on.”

Details are available on… the Microsoft open source blog:
Available under the MIT License, Scope supports a continuous Developer Agent Experience (DevAx) learning loop grounded in repeatable experiments.

The Azure Cosmos DB team’s experience shows what that loop can deliver… “The evaluations led to 20 Agent Kit issues and 27 documentation issues resolved,” [says Jay Gordon, Senior Program Manager, Azure Cosmos DB]… These results connect evaluation to decisions a product team can make: which documentation needs clarification, where tooling needs a fix, and whether an update changes agent behavior.... [The gains] demonstrate how targeted changes, informed by observed behavior, can improve the way agents use a product.

For more on the shift from building for human developers to supporting agents, watch Your Product Was Built for Humans. Is It Ready for Agents? or join us at AI DevCon NYC conference in November.
Scope surfaces everything from incorrect assumptions in documentation (or recurring missed instructions) to whether agents select the intended SDK, initialize it correctly, and use its APIs, leading to clearer descriptions for command-line tool and more actionable errors.

Microsoft’s open source blog also explains why AI agent evaluation needs an open-source foundation:
The challenges behind agent experience aren’t unique to one product or organization. SDK maintainers, tool authors, researchers, and agent developers are all asking how agents behave and what helps them succeed. No single team can represent every language, workflow, or integration. An open project can bring more scenarios, more failure cases, and more viewpoints into the evaluation process… Opening Scope’s execution and evaluation code gives contributors a way to question the methods, investigate unexpected results, and improve the evaluation itself. A shared foundation also reduces duplicated infrastructure. Agent integrations, reusable criteria, and trace-analysis improvements can help other teams study their own products without rebuilding the same machinery. The goal isn’t one universal benchmark or definition of success. It’s a common starting point that teams can adapt to their needs.

The MIT License lets teams use and extend Scope, while self-managed deployments let them evaluate private workloads without publishing their code or run data.... Scope streams activity as the agent works and retains interactions and workspace snapshots for later review. Your team can follow tool calls, inspect generated files, and connect a failed requirement to the steps that preceded it. Those traces provide observable evidence of what the agent did, helping turn a failure into a concrete documentation, SDK, or tooling improvement.

Not the problem in my mind

By paul_engr • • Score: 3 • Thread
Fuck agents and fuck AI and fuck microslop for being a pile of shit

translation

By diffract • • Score: 3 • Thread
we built slop to evaluate the slop. it’s slop all the way down

oh dear…

By Tom • • Score: 3 • Thread

Mickeysoft lost the plot again.

The game-changing element of LLMs and agents is that they have a non-computer-language interface - you can talk to them in plain English (or Chinese or whatever). This makes complex computer interactions available to a much wider audience than any previous computing invention. Adapting humans to the AI is getting that backwards. It’s a sign you don’t understand the first thing about why AI is so widely successful.

I predict this will be an abject failure and a year from now will quietly be pushed to the very back of the bottom-most drawer, never to be spoken off again (though it is getting crowded in there for M$).

Meanwhile, in the real world, everyone I’ve talked to about these things already has a skills file to teach the AI about their personal coding style. This is what actual humans came up with, independently several times, and it works: Adapt the AI to you. Plus we’ve been writing coding style guides for humans for a long time now, we’ve got plenty of experience doing that at least somewhat right.

25% of Incoming Pull Requests May Be AI Slop, Finds Study From Linux Foundation Research

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
“59% of maintainers report growing contribution volume since the rise of GenAI,” according to a new study published by Linux Foundation Research. But 25% of their incoming pull requests “are estimated to be low-quality, also known as ‘AI slop’.” And on large projects, 69% see growing contributions — and estimate that 31% are low-quality/AI slop.

So what do these results show us? “Generative AI is fundamentally changing how people participate in open source,” says the head of Open Source Ecosystem Development at Huawei’s R&D subsidiary Futurewei, which helped support the study. Specifically GenAI is “lowering barriers to contribution” but also “creating new challenges” for maintainers and communities. Their recommendation? “Build the governance, transparency and trust mechanisms that allow AI-assisted contributions to strengthen, but not overwhelm, the open source ecosystem.”

“Open source projects need to design for a growing AI-generated contributor base, not simply react to it,” said Hilary Carter, SVP of Research at the Linux Foundation. “That means setting clear expectations for GenAI, putting responsibility for testing and disclosure on contributors and giving maintainers better tools to manage incoming pull requests. If we get those fundamentals right, AI can expand participation without overburdening and increasing costs for maintainers.”

More from the blog It’s FOSS:
LF Research is the Linux Foundation’s research arm. It was set up in 2021 and publishes studies on how open source is built and used, drawing on surveys and project data. Its latest report, Navigating Open Source Software Development in the Generative AI Era, surveyed 234 contributors and maintainers on how generative AI is affecting the way open source gets made…

64% say reviews now take longer. Burnout is their top concern at 63%, narrowly ahead of contribution quality at 60%.

You will also find that policies have not caught up to the AI-assisted coding and vulnerability reporting trend. Of the 119 respondents who answered the question, 35% said their project has a formal policy permitting AI use. Another 32% have none and no plans for one, 23% plan to write one, and 10% ban AI contributions outright....

Most maintainers (71%) say AI makes it easier for newcomers to start contributing.
Other interesting findings:

OpenSSF and LF AI & Data also helped support the study.


nonsensical

By timeOday • • Score: 3, Interesting • Thread
“may be AI slop” is a nonsensical statement, because if it’s slop it doesn’t matter who wrote it. Whether AI did the coding is not really relevant, although it is a more objective claim.

When you can’t be bothered to to write something..

By BitterEpic • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
When you can’t be bothered to to write something…why should anyone be bothered to read it? We have some idiots doing that right now with AI here on Slashdot.

Licensing barrier

By LainTouko • • Score: 3 • Thread
“If this contains the output of any LLM, provide a full list of the licenses of everything in its training material so we can check compatibility with our license.”

Re:nonsensical

By martin-boundary • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread
AI slop is a completely different kind of slop from bad human programming. You can’t mix up AI slop and bad human programming into one single category. That’s an oversimplification which hinders intelligent discussion.

Systemd Merges Support for Rust Programs

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
“As of today in systemd Git it’s now possible for the systemd programs to be written in the Rust programming language as an alternative to C,” reports Phoronix:
Core systemd code like the systemd library doesn’t yet support Rust code, but for the various systemd programs / leaf components there is now support for using Rust… The new systemd-keyring-setup utility in Rust is used for provisioning keyrings and enrolling X.509 certificates into the kernel’s dm-verity / fs-verity / BPF keyrings during the boot process while dealing them afterward. This systemd-keyring-setup code hasn’t been merged yet but is expected soon now that the Rust infrastructure has landed. Originally it was all part of a single big commit before being split-up for the Rust enablement, systemd-keyring-setup, and other preparations for this new component.

Systemd developers aren’t planning on porting existing C code to Rust, all the Rust code is built with Meson [no Cargo usage], and C linkage only is mandated.

Systemd Rust components come out slightly larger than C with a test program being 32KB compared to 20KB for its C twin. For now at least the systemd Rust support is optional and toggled by the -Drust= Meson option with it being auto by default.

Re:This will certainly be great discussion

By fuzzyfuzzyfungus • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread
I’m not really qualified to deliver a good holy war; but it does seem like there may be something to the criticism that monolithic integration has gone a bit far if supporting one utility being written in a different language is a special feature rather than a matter of the rest of the system not knowing or caring what is on the opposite side of an interface so long as it can act as expected.

Re:This will certainly be great discussion

By fluffernutter • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread
Then why are all the separate little config files monolithic? What cron did with one file you now need many multilinr files for? And what is the format of those config files anyway? It seems like INI which is a Windows thing. The only software that uses that on Linux was made by people who don’t really understand Linux.

AI Use Convinces California Math Professor There’s ‘No Point’ Grading Homework

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
From the student newspaper at the University of California, Berkeley:
Richard Borcherds, a UC Berkeley professor and Fields medalist, no longer grades his students’ homework. After seeing how many of his students used AI to consistently receive top scores, he felt there was “no point” in paying readers to grade for correctness in homework, as AI use is now unavoidable.

Borcherds revealed this in a sit-down interview Tuesday, following OpenAI’s announcement that AI agents apparently solved one of mathematics’ most difficult unsolved problems, the Navier-Stokes existence and smoothness problem. “If AI continues to improve at present rate, then, in a few years, there’ll be nothing human mathematicians can do that AI can’t do better,” Borcherds said.

Borcherds said he currently grades on completion if a student hands in their homework. He admitted that it is “not a very good system,” but at the moment, he has no alternative… Campus has tried several AI detection tools, including Turnitin and Rumi, but have determined that these tools aren’t adequate enough to be standardized on campus.
The article points out that at the university, each class’s AI policy “is up to the discretion of faculty.”

“That’s not intelligence!”

By timeOday • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
“in a few years, there’ll be nothing human mathematicians can do that AI can’t do better,” Borcherds said. " Oh, that’s sad. If history serves as a guide, it means we’ll have to re-define math as “not intellience (TM)" and rationalize that AI is just brute-forcing it since DNN’s are incapable of making novel generalizations (even though they do exactly that, constantly).

Let me fix this for you

By BitterEpic • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

Grading homework is kind of silly anyway. It should be for practice. Regular testing every week or so is the way to go while wearing your Meta glasses.

AI is a type of heroin that is very hard to stop once you start. Students once intoxicated will have a hard time stopping for “weekly tests.” They always eventually become unable to even reference primary sources, where the only truth is AI.

Do you read Sutter Cane?

Re:Good

By Anonymous Coward • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

What do you think homework is? It *is* testing the student’s understanding of the concepts and exposing gaps in that understanding.

Relying only on weekly tests is too late, especially when there are 20+ students dumber than a bag of hammers, to explain concepts several lectures ago.

Re:Let me fix this for you

By arglebargle_xiv • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
So the clanker told you that clankers are all just misunderstood beings/things?

Re:Good

By tlhIngan • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

When I was in university, homework was at most 10% of your grade. The midterm exam was often worth 45%, and the final the other 45%. Often with the stipulation that you must pass the final to pass the course.

I had classes where homework was assigned but not graded. It was obvious who did the homework and who didn’t - you just didn’t do very well on the final or midterm if you didn’t do the optional homework.

Everyone’s an adult. You don’t do the assigned homework at your own risk, even if it isn’t graded. Midterms and final exam correspond to the biggest influence on your grade.

Heck, sometimes the midterm mark can be dropped as well - I’ve had plenty of professors simply say because we scored badly on the midterms, they’ll use the final exam mark if we do better. So if you scored a 30% on the midterm but then get an 80% on the exam, you get an 80% on the class.

Stop the coddling and just treat everyone as an adult. Assign homework, but don’t mark it. You can ask if people had a problem they got stuck on so they could work it out as part of the lecture, but not part of the grade. The final grade you get depends solely on the midterm and/or the final exam.

(I got a D on a class where I didn’t do the homework. The second semester the followup course I did the homework and got an A-)

A Newly Proposed Linux Filesystem Can Fix Corrupted Data

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
BeamFS creator Aurelien Desbrieres is not calling for a merge, but is requesting feedback on an 18-patch proposal that takes the place of FTRFS, an earlier filesystem he proposed in April.

The Linux/Open Source blog It’s FOSS reports:
Filesystems that can repair damage, like Btrfs and ZFS, usually do it by falling back on a spare copy of the data. BeamFS skips that and stores Reed-Solomon error-correcting codes inside every block. Every read gets checked against those codes, and small amounts of damage are corrected before the data reaches the application. If the filesystem can tell the damage is beyond repair, the read fails with an error instead of returning the wrong bytes…

In his technical report, ext4 and ext3 returned wrong data without any error, while Btrfs refused to read the file. BeamFS returned the correct file every time except once, when a flip hit a pointer to the file’s data and it refused the read.
“Aurelien says he used Anthropic’s Claude to write the code, the tool that checks the patches, and the cover letter…”

The physics is measured, not supposed.

By NobleNobbler • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

Oh FFS. I hope the linux mailing list doesn’t start accepting these claude jargon filled technical discourses.

“atmospheric neutrons alone upset avionics at altitude (Normand [9]); and the medium is not exempt”

??????

Vibe coded huh?

By karmawarrior • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

A vibe coded *file system*. Really.

Gonna stay away from this one.

Re:The physics is measured, not supposed.

By MachineShedFred • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

Just because you don’t understand, doesn’t make it not true.

Cosmic radiation indeed causes higher storage failure rates in avionics systems. However, because we can do things like redundant storage, the problem usually isn’t in the file system, but the SSD firmware.

It’s incredibly common to replace an LRU (Line Replaceable Unit), take the SSD out of the replaced LRU and reflash the firmware on it, and reinstall and test to find out that the device works perfectly again because it was a bit-flip in the SSD controller firmware.

Source: I am an avionics engineer.

Why ?

By Bomazi • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
Linux already has dm-integrity, a layer that emulates a block device with per-sector tags that store integrity information. If you insert it between a block device and any filesystem, you get the same result, including a read error if the data cannot be corrected.

I don’t see an explanation of why you would need a whole new filesystem.

Cute… and not caring.

By Slartibartfast • • Score: 3 • Thread

As a PoC, I’m all over this. But BeamFS supports neither CoW nor journaling, both of which I consider essential for a modern FS. So… yeah. “Heck, no.” Maybe someday it will acquire those features, or its “one neat trick” will be merged into another FS.

AI Delivers ‘Zero Financial Payoff’ To Most Companies, Economist Says

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
“Despite massive investments and widespread hype around AI , the technology has delivered zero financial payoff to corporate America outside of tech,” writes the chief economist at U.S. asset management firm Apollo Global.

He adds that “there are still no signs of AI boosting productivity growth… [M]ainstream corporate America is pulling back and starting to view token spending not as a source of growth but as a cost center that weighs on margins.”
VC-backed companies are spending more and more on tokens, but mainstream corporate America does not need the latest model and is unwilling to pay for it. As long as agentic AI and token spending are confined to a small part of the economy, the macroeconomic effects of AI will be very limited…

The question looking ahead is whether, even as models become commoditized, mainstream corporate America can turn increasingly cheap intelligence into higher revenue growth and higher profit margins. That may be harder than it sounds. AI may be a great calculator, but in business, intelligence is mostly judgment. Judgment depends on context, and the answer varies with which human or which model you ask. Perhaps most importantly, AI does not understand accountability, trust, culture, unwritten rules, ethical trade-offs or fairness, all of which shape reputational risk and ultimately drive revenue growth and profit margins.

The bottom line is that the AI story will be decided in the S&P 493, not the Mag 7, and so far, there is no evidence that revenue growth or margins are improving outside the tech sector.
More details from TechCrunch:
Apollo’s Torsten Slok focuses on what he calls the S&P 493 — the S&P 500, minus Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta, Microsoft, Nvidia and Tesla — finding that profit margins and revenue per worker appear to be flat, with no evidence that AI is improving productivity…

Recent studies have also found that AI has yet to deliver significant productivity gains.

Re:Gemini can you respond for me?

By know-nothing cunt • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

I fed that into ChatGPT and it just said “tl;dr.”

In other words …

By fahrbot-bot • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

in business, intelligence is mostly judgment. Judgment depends on context, and the answer varies with which human or which model you ask.

Almost like having different kinds of people, with different backgrounds and experiences is helpful. Too bad that’s unpopular at the moment. /s

We are permanently losing part of ourselves

By BitterEpic • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

AI is used to devalue the things people find important. Success did not mean it improves the lives of normal people… it means taking advantage of them.

When I receive a fake image from someone using AI, I deserve to be pissed. When I receive an AI generated reply, I deserve to be pissed. The technology is pushed first and foremost to destroy human interaction.

AI is incensing part of the population where is there is not pushback on stolen IP for those not using it. We will choose voting for America’s destruction when there are no sufficiently anti AI candidates. And then you get to start experiencing what we experience.

Re:Excellent news

By timeOday • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

Yeah academic studies and surveys have a long and consistent record of failing to find any befit from IT in general:

- AI-generated answer (with direct quotes and cites)

1. Ng, Pan & Wilson (1998) Ã" Most businesses saw no revenue benefit ÃoeA majority (56%) indicated that their presence on the World Wide Web did not produce any noticeable change in their turnoverà The study also found that approximately 31% reported increased turnover, while 13% could not identify an effect. Citation: Ng, H.-I., Pan, Y. J., & Wilson, T. D. (1998). Business Use of the World Wide Web: A Report on Further Investigations. International Journal of Information Management, 18(5), 291Ã"314, p. 310. Information Research Full paper (PDF)

2. Hitt & Brynjolfsson (1996) Ã" IT investments did not necessarily increase profitability ÃoeHowever, we do not find evidence that these benefits have resulted in supranormal business profitability.Ã The researchers examined IT investments at 370 large firms. They found productivity gains and benefits to consumers, but no evidence of above-normal profits attributable to IT investments. Citation: Hitt, L. M., & Brynjolfsson, E. (1996). Productivity, Business Profitability, and Consumer Surplus: Three Different Measures of Information Technology Value. MIS Quarterly, 20(2), 121Ã"142. Iecon Paper and abstract

3. Subramani & Walden (2001) Ã" Internet initiatives increased stock market valuations ÃoeThe results suggest that e-commerce initiatives do indeed lead to significant positive CARs for firms’ shareholders.Ã Studying 251 e-commerce announcements from late 1998, the researchers found positive abnormal stock returns ranging from 4.9% to 23.4% across different subsamples. However, these were stock market gains reflecting expectations of future profitability, not demonstrated increases in operating profits. Citation: Subramani, M., & Walden, E. (2001). The Impact of E-Commerce Announcements on the Market Value of Firms. Information Systems Research, 12(2), 135Ã"154. PubsOnLine Full paper (PDF)

Bottom line The findings illustrate three different aspects of the late-1990s Internet economy:

- 1996: IT investments improved productivity without demonstrably generating above-normal corporate profits.
- 1998: Most surveyed businesses reported no measurable increase in revenue from their websites.
  - 1998 data, published 2001: Investors nevertheless rewarded companies announcing Internet initiatives with substantial increases in stock market valuation.

The important limitation: None of these studies established whether the average company earned a positive or negative net return on adopting the Internet. The 1998 survey comes closest to measuring actual business results specifically attributable to Internet adoption.

- end of AI
Studies in the social sciences invariably prove what is popular. Watch, you’ll see, and they consistently lean luddite. They resent new capabilities changing the world more than their ‘insights’ ever do. New capabilities are what change the world, but why should technologists have all the power to determine the future? (As if innovation, innovation, and history worked that way at all - particularly since inventors (individuals or nations) usually have a slim window of exclusivity.

Re: AI use is like drugs

By WaffleMonster • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

The fact that you think having a conversation and an argument are the same thing tells us everything we need to know about you.

Your own words “If you question something it says push back with your own counter-arguments.” this is called arguing. You yourself use the word “arguments”. Do you think if you converse your “counter-arguments” with it nicely and diplomatically so as to not hurt its feelings the experience will be more useful?

LLMs have no meta-cognition of any kind whatsoever. They don’t know what they know. They don’t know what they don’t know. They don’t even know what know is.

Google Says Gmail and Photos Data Shared with AI Search Could Be Used for Targeted Ads

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
The blog Android Authority offers this TLDR:
Google updated its privacy policy to clarify that it could use information shared through Personal Intelligence to personalize ads. Gmail, Drive, and Photos content isn’t used for targeted ads by default, but connecting them to eligible Google services could change that.
Digital Trends explains:
Google has long promised that your Gmail, Drive, and Google Photos content never helps it personalize ads. However, since October 16, 2026, its privacy policy adds a catch. The promise lapses if you let other ad-showing Google services use that content. That means using Personal Intelligence, an opt-in tool that lets Google’s AI search read your connected apps, does exactly that (via Google).

If you ask Google’s AI Mode where to eat near your hotel, and it can identify your hotel from the booking confirmation in Gmail, find the location in Maps, and then suggest a few places you might like. That’s the helpful half. The twist, however, is that AI Mode can also show sponsored results. Google mentions that the personalized ads follow what the question and answer are about. So, while your inbox never goes to an advertiser, it can quietly shape the answer, which, in turn, shapes the ads.

Google’s defense is elaborate. First, it says connecting the apps is optional. Second, advertisers can’t see the information or content Google accesses in your Workspace apps (including your inbox and photos). Finally, sensitive topics like health are off-limits.
Ars Technica shares the response they got from a Google spokesperson: that Google isn’t scanning your entire inbox to feed their advertising profiles, but if you choose to pipe your personal data into an AI search tool — then the ads Google shows you could be based on that information.
If you want to ensure ads never use your personal data in this way, you’ll need to make sure Personal Intelligence is turned off. The easiest way is to access the Gemini settings for Personal Intelligence and disable the connected apps. These settings are also a few levels deep in your main Google account settings under Data & privacy > Personalization settings > Manage Personalized Recommendations in Search Services > Connected Content Apps. From there, you can disable connections to Workspace and Google Photos.

Revised Google Privacy Policy

By PPH • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Just adds the word “Sucker!” at the end.

oh, goody

By usedtobestine • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

I should epxect to see ads for strippers, intimate Asian massage, and Atlanta escorts.
I can’t wait. /sarc

Re:oh, goody

By awwshit • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

The ad networks already seem to think that I’m a 21 year old Hispanic female from Alaska that likes Celebrities and Cats. I would hate to disappoint them.

I will be happy when

By FudRucker • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
I can get a smartphone that is not under the control of Apple or Google, they both recently ruined their maps apps with advertisements embedded getting in the way of what you are trying to search, way to go Apple & google you both shit on the only useful app you made

Re:I will be happy when

By eneville • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

I self host most of my things, so the smart phone is just a ssh client to mutt running remotely. Yes, that means I can’t see pictures in mail, but that also means I don’t have to see spam pictures either. Since I self host, I don’t use gmail on the phone and perhaps only use maps. There’s not a lot of overlap and the phone doesn’t feel like a giant advert mill.

Free Software Foundation Hosts Free ‘Encryptfest’ Event on Sunday

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
The Free Software Foundation’s "EncryptFest" today covers both encryption and privacy. The free two-hour event runs from 13:00-15:00 Eastern Daylight Time (17:00-19:00 UTC), and includes:

— A discussion on “bulk surveillance, and how encryption protects personal privacy”

— A short video from renowned cryptographer Bruce Schneier.

— A discussion with Henry Fisher, the founder of Techlore and a digital rights activist

— A hands-on workshop on how you can encrypt your email using the FSF’s Email Self-Defense guide “as a concrete step to enhance your data privacy”

You may join us virtually, or if you are in Boston, Massachusetts, United States (the FSF’s home base), you can join us in-person at the Boston Public Library’s Copley Square branch. You may also join us in-person at MakeHaven in New Haven, Connecticut, US, and meet our deputy director Sean O’Brien. Whether attending our event online or in-person, please register. It will help us plan ahead and enable us to contact you about other important details before the workshop, like what to expect and what to bring…

Bulk surveillance violates our fundamental rights and makes free speech dangerous. Email encryption is an excellent tool you can use to shield yourself from bulk surveillance. Encrypting your email is also a concrete step towards protecting your data from others whose intentions may not be honorable.

What A Bunch of Clowns

By SlashbotAgent • • Score: 3 • Thread

25 minutes notice on Slashdot.

One and a half days notice on the FSF blog. Published on Sep 23, 2026 04:30 PM

Either they wanted a private party, or the FSF is a bunch of fucking clowns.

As eMudhra Exits Cert Business, Users Face New PKI Trust Decisions

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
“As of 2026, the company has issued more than 60 million digital certificates,” notes Wikipedia. But now, InfoWorld reports:
A certificate authority’s decision to abandon the global SSL/TLS market is exposing a weakness many organizations rarely examine: their dependence on complex PKI trust chains. Following the compromise of private keys behind eight of its intermediate certificate authorities, eMudhra is exiting the global SSL/TLS certificate business and is offering customers Sectigo-issued replacements… [In a press note the company added] that data sovereignty and compliance requirements had increased the business’s complexity and cost… The company said it will contact affected customers to replace certificates free of cost. It also said it will keep revocation and certificate status services running until every issued certificate has expired or been replaced…

Yash Kadakia, co-founder and CTO of Security Brigade, said that moving to another root operated by the same company does not necessarily address concerns over trust and governance. “The last thing organisations need is to migrate twice,” Kadakia said.
But there’s another concern, the article points out. “Analysts warn that enterprises may discover they have only limited visibility into the certificate hierarchies underpinning critical services.”
Replacing a website’s certificate may not address every dependency in an enterprise environment, according to Sakshi Grover, research director at IDC. She said residual exposure lies in systems that maintain their own trust stores and do not update on the same schedule as browsers. These include Java keystores, language runtimes, container images, mutual TLS configurations, proxies, load balancers, VPN and security appliances, and embedded devices. “The harder finding for many organizations will be that they can’t answer these questions at all,” Grover said, referring to where certificate trust decisions are made outside browsers and operating systems…

Grover recommended that security teams first identify where trust decisions occur outside browsers and operating systems, prioritising systems that accept connections from external parties and mutual TLS endpoints. Teams should then determine which systems can be updated to distrust a specific intermediate certificate or public key, she said.

Re:How Hard Can The Decision Be?

By fuzzyfuzzyfungus • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
That’s the problem. It’s relatively easy to fire a certificate issuer; but it can get surprisingly fiddly surprisingly fast to ensure that all your stuff actually distrusts one(unless you are responsible for basically nothing but a a handful of in-support major browsers and are OK with the choices their vendors make, in which case it will be handled for you relatively quickly; and was in this case). Basically any network connected widget is going to have at least one trusted root store embedded in it somewhere, possibly not updated anymore; and a number of software packages either bring their own or only partially track the OS-provided one.

You also have very little control over what other people do; both what CAs they chose to get certs from and what…questionable…partnership decisions the root CAs you do chose to trust. It’s not technically secret; but unless you are practically a full-time PKI nerd you probably didn’t know until after the fact that Comodo, now Sectigo, had quietly trusted eMudhra for you.

Re:Who is eMudhra

By bill_mcgonigle • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

This discussion on their inclusion in Mozilla is quite revealing:

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/s…

Elsewhere it’s claimed that they used a FIPS HSM to generate their keys.

I did not see who their auditor was.

Did eMudhra lie?
Did the auditor lie?
Are FIPS HSM’s backdoored?
Do we have another Dual_EC_DRBG situation on our hands here?

If nobody is lying we could have just seen a huge cyberwar or false flag averted. Essential crypto gear could be totally buggered still.

PS Remember when Mozilla gave CACert absolute hell for years when they were tremendously more competent?

The HSM probably wasn’t the problem

By Xenographic • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

You should probably also read the ticket where eMudhra is removed because it clarifies a few things.

They’re using Ultimaco HSMs, but it seems likely they weren’t willing to pay the HSM vendor to unlock a feature, so they rolled their own and ended up generating the bad keys off-device and then loading them into the HSM externally. So it’s less likely that the HSM itself was bad and more likely they did something insecure and dumb to be cheap. There are some pointed questions there which they’ve just decided not to answer so far, including things they should be able to provide like the key generation script.

Re:The HSM probably wasn’t the problem

By Charlotte • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread

This also clarifies things (why am I not surprised):

Current situation:

        The cross-signed certs are still unrevoked
        No response from Microsoft
        CCADB still showing certificates as unrevoked

Online security?

By Quakeulf • • Score: 3 • Thread

4

Getty Images Files For US Bankruptcy, Advances Restructuring Plan

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Reuters reports:
Last week, Getty announced plans to file for bankruptcy, marking a major reset after its planned merger with rival Shutterstock collapsed under the weight of heavy debt and growing competition from AI-generated imagery.

Getty said the affiliates of the Getty family and Koch Equity Development, which committed to provide up to $533 million in new equity, will own 100% of the company after the restructuring

It’s hard to compete against things like the DALL-E image generator.
Long-time Slashdot reader schwit1 quips that maybe “It’s hard to compete against things like the DALL-E image generator…”

Re: AI was going to hit them like a brick

By blue trane • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

(Disclaimer: Written with an AI collaborator, because human editors were apparently too busy copy-pasting to proofread.)

Speaking of slop, notice how the summary ends by repeating the exact same sentence twice:

“It’s hard to compete against things like the DALL-E image generator.”
“Long-time Slashdot reader schwit1 quips that maybe ‘It’s hard to compete against things like the DALL-E image generator…’"

When humans publish duplicate-riddled writeups without reading them, it really raises the question of whether “human slop” is even setting a higher bar than “AI slop.”

To your point about “good enough”: market dynamics have always favored cheap and good-enough over high-quality and expensive for standard commercial uses. Stock photo giants like Getty relied on charging massive licensing fees for stock images (or bullying photographers over copyright).

When a restaurant menu, blog post, or corporate deck just needs a generic image of a salad or a boardroom, AI generation is free, instant, and “good enough” for the buyer. The tragedy isn’t that AI art is superior—it’s that for 90% of basic commercial applications, nobody wanted to pay Getty prices in the first place.

Re:AI was going to hit them like a brick

By kurkosdr • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
Exactly. Getty images has a habit of adding public domain images to their portfolio and then fraudulently claiming ownership and issuing DMCA takedowns to random people who happen to use those public domain images and threatening those people with legal action.

I will be happy to see them gone and let other stock image companies take their place, but unfortunately, it seems like they will emerge from bankruptcy.

Re:AI was going to hit them like a brick

By kurkosdr • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
What Getty Images is doing is worse. They take a public domain image, add it to their portfolio, and then fraudulently claim ownership (complete with sending DMCA takedowns and legal threats to anyone who happens to be using that public domain images). At least LLM companies don’t send DMCA takedowns and lawyers when their models ingest someone’s work.

Fuck Yea!

By SlashbotAgent • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

Getty Images is nothing but a bunch of IP trolls. I can’t wait for them to cease existing!

Good by and good riddance to Getty Images!

Re: AI was going to hit them like a brick

By thegarbz • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

EditorDavid is not AI. He predates AI. He’s more like a poorly written php script.

Old Blood Cells Have Been Transformed Into Brain Stem Cells That Get Younger

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot
“Scientists have transformed old blood cells into young brain stem cells, which continued to grow younger as they grew older,” reports ScienceAlert:
Cellular transformations can be done in two main ways. The first, more circuitous route turns a specific cell back into a pluripotent stem cell, or an embryonic “blank slate,” and then into a different cell type. The second method involves a “direct conversion,” which skips the middle stage and directly transforms a cell into a different type. “Using this method, we have directly converted red blood cell precursors into neural stem cells,” summarizes Oliver Brüstle, the director of the Institute of Reconstructive Neurobiology at the University Hospital of Bonn…

The researchers used a virus to deliver two transcription factors, or proteins that attach to DNA to regulate gene activity, to get the cells to change their types. Then they used two genome-bloodhounding methods — DNA methylation measures and RNA sequencing — to track the resultant anti-aging effects and genetic behavior. By the 12th day after the viral “infection,” the cells started showing their new identity, ditching their blood-like proteins and replacing them with the expression of neural-like proteins instead. Initially, the epigenetic age (the DNA changes accumulated over time) of the EPCs was highly correlated with the chronological age of their donors [but] the neuronal stem cells kept getting younger as they got older… Over the following 50 to 100 days, they kept de-aging, eventually reaching about 5 percent of the donor age, with the majority of epigenetic age-related traits resetting by around 50 days of the conversion process…

In effect, the converted cells became 60 years younger in 50 days, the researchers note in their official statement.
The researchers, from the University Hospital of Bonn and the University of Bonn, in Germany, described their methods in the journal Aging Cell.

Egg, meet chicken

By flyingfsck • • Score: 3, Funny • Thread
Soon they can make a chicken that will grow up into an egg, putting a new spin on that age old conundrum

Believe it if you will

By HiThere • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

There is no good marker for the “age” of a cell. Mutations tend to accumulate over life, and there’s a reason for the Hayflick limit (even if it isn’t universal).

Manipulating cells so that they will continue dividing is dangerous to whoever gets them. It may be necessary, but don’t fool yourself about its danger. This sounds like a recipe for brain cancer.

We can’t stop it—you’re dying of youth!

By BrendaEM • • Score: 4, Funny • Thread
You’ll be four by next April, and an embryo soon after. The test confirm it.