Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Elon Musk Vies to Turn X Into Super App With Banking Tool Near Launch
  2. Remembering The 1984 Unix PC. Why Did It Fail So Hard?
  3. How Will Apple Change Under Its New CEO?
  4. Linux Version of Framework’s Laptop 13 Pro is Outselling Its Windows Variant
  5. New Problem for NASA’s ‘Lunar Gateway’: Corrosion in Two Modules Caused by Supplier
  6. How Teachers Fight Students’ Shortening Attention Spans Shorter Activities, Hands-On Projects, and Meditation
  7. Fans Angry Over Pokemon Go Champion’s Disqualification For Allegedly Shaking the Table
  8. Privacy Advocate Accuses US Government of Investing in AI-Powered Mass Surveillance
  9. 40 Years After the Chernobyl Disaster, More Countries Are Turning To Nuclear Power
  10. Is AI Cannibalizing Human Intelligence? A Neuroscientist’s Way to Stop It
  11. Trump Fires All 24 Members of America’s National Science Board
  12. Australia’s Teen Social Media Ban Isn’t Working. Half Their Teens Still Have Access, Survey Finds
  13. Colorado Adds Open-Source Exemption to Age-Verification Bill
  14. Is the World Ready For a Car Without a Rear Window?
  15. Open Source Developer Brings Linux to Windows 95, Windows 98, and Windows ME

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Elon Musk Vies to Turn X Into Super App With Banking Tool Near Launch

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader shared this report from Bloomberg:
More than three years after acquiring Twitter, Elon Musk says he’s nearing his long-stated goal of turning it into an “everything app” with a new financial services tool that he pledged to launch for the public this month… Early users testing the service have touted competitive perks, including 3% cash back on eligible purchases and a 6% interest rate on cash savings — the latter of which is roughly 15 times the national average. Musk’s new product is also expected to offer free peer-to-peer transfers, a metal Visa debit card personalised with a user’s X handle, and an AI concierge built by Musk’s xAI startup that tracks spending and sorts through past transactions, according to reports from users with early access.

Musk, who first rose to prominence in Silicon Valley by co-founding PayPal Holdings Inc, sees payments as crucial to creating a so-called super app similar to social products that have flourished in China. WeChat, for example, lets users hail a ride, book a flight and pay off their credit card… If it works, X Money would sit at the intersection of social media and finance in a way no American product has attempted at this scale… Creators who currently receive payments from X for engagement will be switched from Stripe to X Money as their payment platform, according to early users — a move that guarantees an initial base of active accounts. Some have already been testing X Money to send payments to one another through the app’s chat feature or directly through their profiles, according to early participants in the rollout…

X currently holds licences in 44 states, according to its website, and likely won’t be able to operate in states where it hasn’t obtained a licence.

Interesting

By SlashbotAgent • Score: 3 Thread

I’ve recently been looking into India’s digital payment system, Unified Payment Interface(UPI). It seems so good in so many ways. Direct INSTANT payments, person to person or merchant. Free! It really seems like the best system I’ve seen so far.

But, when I look at implementing such a system in America, I start to realize that credit cards offer features that India’s system lacks. Buyer protection is one such feature. I can easily roll back a credit charge. It’s vastly superior to direct bank debits.

Sure, the credit card system has caused price inflation as the ~3% that merchants have to pay is built into the price of goods. But that money is never coming back to the consumer. Even if the 3% is eliminated, the merchants will still charge the same and enjoy higher margins.

I guess that an instant digital system, like India’s, is still vastly better than our present system of slow-ass cheques, debit cards, and ACH transfers. There’s no reason why we can’t have both a digital cash system and credit cards.

I’m hoping that Elon’s system gives us the best of both worlds. But, I fully expect greedy fucks to turn it into just another consumer fleecing piece of shit.

Your money is TOTALLY safe in X

By apparently • Score: 3 Thread
Surely, there’s no need to worry about the safety of storing your money in X, even though Musk’s previous Y2K-era x.com permitted customers for almost a month to transfer funds from any other account in the nation’s banking system

Remembering The 1984 Unix PC. Why Did It Fail So Hard?

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“I love these machines,” writes long-time Slashdot reader Shayde:
I was super-active in the Unix-PC Usenet groups back in the 90s… We hacked the hell out of them. They were small, sexy, and… they ran Unix!

Unfortunately, they were a commercial failure. There were so many things wrong with them — not just stuff that broke, but the baseline configuration was nigh on worthless. I recently was able to get another machine and got it up and running (with a few hiccups). I whipped up a video showing all the cool things it can do, but also running through what went wrong and why it ultimately failed.
The video shows the ancient green-on-black screen of 1984’s AT&T Unix PC (with the OS running on a silicon drive emulation). The original machine had 512K of memory and a 10-megabyte hard drive described as slow, failure-prone, and noisy. There’s also a drive for inserting floppy disks, and a separate MS-DOS board (with its own CPU) that could be plugged into the expansion slot — but the device was “remarkably heavy,” weighing in aqt 40 pounds

See the strange 1984 mouse, and its keyboard with both a Return key and a separate Enter key. There’s even plug-in ports for phone landlines. “It looked great,” Shayde says in the video, showing off its Spirograph demo and ‘80s-era games like Pong, Conway’s Game of Life, GNU Chess, “Trk”, and NetHack. But besides slow startup times, it was expensive — in today’s dollars, it would’ve cost roughly $15,000 — and suffered from Unix’s lack of spreadsheets, word processing software and other office productivity tools at the time. At that price the Unix PCs couldn’t compete with IBM’s home computers and their desktop applications. “It just didn’t have the resources, the software, the capabilities and the price point that made it attractive.”

It was price

By karmawarrior • Score: 5, Informative Thread

You could get an IBM PC clone and put Xenix on it for a fraction of the price. There were plenty of nerds who wanted Unix, it was always hyped up as the next big thing, but nobody wanted to spend that much.

And why did Xenix tank? Because Xenix was also expensive. Around a thousand dollars for the base system which didn’t even include a C compiler.

It wasn’t until MINIX came out, and Coherent dropped in price, that Unix-on-a-commodity-system became practical. And even then, it took Linux and the various GNU distributions to actually become a well supported, common enough, OS for it to gain traction outside of neckbeards.

I’ll Tell You Why

By SlashbotAgent • Score: 3 Thread

There were two primary reasons why it failed.

1. Price. It cost a frigging fortune!

2a. No off the shelf software. At its price point the only “people” buying these were businesses and granted researchers. But, there was no off the shelf or precompiled business software for it to be useful.

2b. You had to write your own software. Even if you bought software or had a developer write it for you, you then had to compile it to run on this box. There were only a select few with the knowledge, time, and patience to compile their own shit on that oversized calculator.

The short answer

By Slashythenkilly • Score: 3 Thread
Computers were large, expensive, unable to interface, and impractical. The attitude at the time was, “id rather just have a typewriter” which honestly was still a luxury. If you wanted to game, you were better off buying a console. If you were writing, a typewriter with error correction paper was the way to go. Data processing was done with a calculator and spreadsheets were done by hand.

Similarly expensive …

By fahrbot-bot • Score: 3 Thread

I never worked with one of those AT&T Unix PCs, but had a Sun386i on my desk for a while, on loan from a customer — we offered a large discount on the software support contract if the customer loaned us one of their systems for support and development. We added an expansion storage case (that attached on top) with a (I think) 500MB SCSI disk, that was physically huge by today’s standards - it had 8 platters and was almost the size of a shoe box. I later used that disk on my BSD/386 system, then disassembled it when it died and made the platter assembly into a paperweight that I still have.

How Will Apple Change Under Its New CEO?

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
How will Apple change in September under its new CEO — former hardware chief John Ternus? The blog Geeky Gadgets is already expecting "significant updates to the iPhone over the next three years,” as well as streamlined internal engineering (plus durability enhancements and high-capacity batteries).

2026: Foldable display
2027: Bezel-less iPhone 20 (celebrating the iPhone’s 20th anniversary)

CNET’s web sites (which include ZDNET, PCMag, Mashable and Lifehacker) are even hosting a contest “to see which of our readers can make the best Apple predictions for 2026. Answer five questions in any of our three rounds of the contest to be entered to win [$applePrize] in September.”

But the blog 9to5Mac already has a list of new upcoming Apple products, courtesy of Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman (who appeared on the TBPN podcast this week “to talk about Apple’s CEO transition, what to expect from John Ternus, and more.”
As part of the conversation, Gurman said: “There are six major Apple products in development right now, six major new product categories.” Here’s the full list he shared:

1. AI AirPods
2. Smart glasses
3. Pendant
4. Smart display
5. Tabletop robot
6. Security camera

[…] Gurman has reported on the Pendant before as a new AI wearable that’s an alternative to AI AirPods and Glasses. All three products are expected to rely heavily on a paired iPhone for Siri and other AI features. The smart display (‘HomePad’), tabletop robot, and security camera are all brand new Apple Home products.
The AI features arrive "thanks to the revamped Apple Foundation Models trained by Google Gemini,” reports the AppleInsider blog (citing Gurman’s Power On newsletter at Bloomberg). The smart doorbell camera will include “an Apple Intelligence-upgraded version of the facial recognition already included with HomeKit Secure Video. Today, HSV can utilize the Apple Home admin’s tagged faces in their Photos app to label people that are viewed on the camera. When a known person rings the doorbell, Siri will announce them by name over the HomePod chime.”

Linux Version of Framework’s Laptop 13 Pro is Outselling Its Windows Variant

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Framework began shipping its new Laptop 13 Pro this week. And the Ubuntu variant is outselling the Windows variant, reports PC World:
[I]t’s selling quickly by Framework’s internal metrics, with six batches of the Intel version of the laptop already sold out. [A later Framework social media post added “Spoke too soon, we’re onto Batch 8.”]

“Also nice validation of our approach, the Ubuntu configurations are outselling the Windows ones!”

That’s not really surprising, for a few reasons. One, if you’re buying a Framework laptop, you have a good reason to order it without an OS, even if you want Windows 11. It’s easy to get it free or cheap elsewhere. (Framework says it’s not counting the “None (bring your own)" option in these Ubuntu numbers.) Two, there are precious few places to order a new laptop with any kind of Linux pre-loaded — you’ve got Framework, a few smaller vendors like System76 and Slimbook, and a few models from Dell. Lenovo sold Ubuntu-loaded laptops at one point, but I can’t find any on the site right now…

Perhaps it doesn’t hurt that Microsoft and Windows are currently on a bit of an apology tour. After a couple of years of pushing hard on “AI” features that no one wants — not even the people who do want “AI” want the Copilot flavor — Microsoft is pulling back its integration into everything and now promising features that Windows has been missing ever since Windows 10.
Framework also reports that:

Of course it is. It’s cheaper.

By TheMiddleRoad • Score: 3 Thread
Save $100 bucks. Use a cheap Windows serial bought online, or install a cracked version of Windows with much of the BS removed. Relatively few are actually going to run Linux primarily.

Never run Windows on bare metal!

By Misagon • Score: 3 Thread

Linux as host OS is the way.

I think that if you are going to run MS Windows at all, then you should run it in a virtual machine that supports snapshots.
Then, if you’d get a bad Windows Update — which MS has had a tendency to push out much too often lately — then you would be able to roll back your Windows installation to a previous snapshot instead of getting a bricked computer.

Your data should also never be on the C: drive, for the same reason.

New Problem for NASA’s ‘Lunar Gateway’: Corrosion in Two Modules Caused by Supplier

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
In March, NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman announced that the moon-orbiting “Lunar Gateway” space station was being “paused” to focus instead of missions to the moon’s surface. And Ars Technica agrees that the project was essentially “spending billions of dollars to make it more difficult to reach the lunar surface and faced the prospect of watching Chinese astronauts wander around on the Moon from orbit instead of being there themselves.”

“But this week, we learned another reason that Gateway is going away, and it’s pretty shocking.”
During testimony before the US House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, Isaacman faced questions about NASA’s budget… He then publicly confirmed rumors (reported last month by Ars) that there is corrosion in both the HALO [Habitation and Logistics Outpost] and I-HAB modules of the Gateway. “The only two habitable volumes that were delivered — both were corroded,” Isaacman said. “And that’s unfortunate because it would have delayed, probably beyond 2030, the application of Gateway....”

In a statement, Northrop confirmed the issue as well. “Using NASA-approved processes, Northrop Grumman is completing repairs to HALO after a manufacturing irregularity,” a company spokesperson told Ars. “We expect to complete repairs by the end of the third quarter. HALO can still be repurposed for any mission, and it’s the most mature technology to support a deep space or lunar habitat.” By referring to a “manufacturing irregularity,” Northrop answered the central mystery here: how corrosion could appear in both modules. This is because a French-Italian space and defense company, Thales Alenia Space, built the primary structure of HALO for Northrop Grumman. The module was delivered from Italy to the United States about a year ago

Thales is a powerhouse of the European space industry. It built several pressurized modules of the International Space Station, and it’s working with Axiom Space to build its commercial space station. The company also had a big piece of the Lunar Gateway in addition to HALO, developing the I-HAB module and a future communications and refueling module known as ESPRIT… After the issue was discovered, the European Space Agency established a “tiger team” to investigate. “Based on the investigation and available data, the corrosion issue was understood to be technically manageable and did not constitute a showstopper for I-HAB, which was, in any case, in better conditions than HALO from [a] corrosion point of view,” the spokesperson said…

After publication of this story on Friday, Axiom Space confirmed that it has also experienced corrosion issues. In a statement, the company said: “Axiom Space has experienced a similar phenomenon with the first module; we are leveraging the expertise of NASA and Thales Alenia Space to address the issue. Module 1 is on track to launch in 2028.”

Alloy exposed to salty, humid sea air

By Mirnotoriety • Score: 5, Informative Thread
ClippyAI: The alloy at the center of the Gateway controversy is Aluminum-Lithium 2195. The very chemical properties that make 2195 high-performing also make it vulnerable to Stress Corrosion Cracking (SCC). HALO was manufactured in Turin, Italy, and then shipped across the Atlantic to the United States. Exposure to salty, humid sea air is a worst-case scenario for this alloy.

Re:Northrop answered the central mystery here:

By rufey • Score: 5, Informative Thread

While you had to read further on and also between the lines, they did answer the question of how both modules had corrosion.

The structure element of both the HALO and I-HAB modules were built by one sub-contractor: Thales Alenia Space. And the source of the corrosion came from that one sub contractor.

Agreed that at first I thought the “central question” was how did it happen, but apparently the “central question” in this context was how more than one piece of hardware have corrosion. By identifying the single source for the corrosion on both modules, then can then figure out the how it came about and why it wasn’t uncovered in the manufacturing process.

I have fairly low standards for journalism, and this one is, sadly, below what I’d expect. I wouldn’t rule out this being written mostly by a LLM. I did watch the part of the hearing where Isaacman mentioned the corrosion, and it didn’t seem to a big deal during the hearing, as in “stop the press!” type revelation. And the fact that its being repaired seems to indicate it didn’t compromise the entire structure where it would need to be thrown onto the scrap heap. This could be just the tip of the iceberg of issues with Gateway that would have pushed it well past 2030.

I would say though that removing the Gateway element from the moon landing goal actually makes things simpler by removing the “rest stop” if you will from the picture. Apollo didn’t need something like Gateway to land on the moon. Just skip the rest stop and go directly to your destination. And if you don’t need to stop at the rest stop, don’t build the rest stop at all.

How Teachers Fight Students’ Shortening Attention Spans Shorter Activities, Hands-On Projects, and Meditation

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
The Washington Post reports that some teachers are now implementing “brain breaks” in their classrooms to cope with shorter attention spans, “including limiting screen time; cutting the time students spend on one activity; adding more engaging, hands-on projects; and practicing meditation.”
Some teachers say the efforts are helping, at least a little… To engage students, teachers say they often feel the need to deliver teaching not only in shorter bursts, but also in more entertaining ways. “The new word is ‘edutainment,’" said Curtis Finch, superintendent of Deer Valley Unified School District in Arizona. “How can you make your lesson applicable, interactive? Teachers are going to have to be more engaging for students....”

In a kindergarten classroom at McKinley STEAM [a K-8 public school], students start the day with a meditation. The classroom of two dozen children is perhaps its quietest during this short activity every morning. Imagine you’re in the Arctic, a voice from a meditation video tells them, with snowflakes melting on your skin. Silently, the children lay down on the carpet and close their eyes for a moment. After the meditation, the students gather in a circle and do a few deep breathing exercises before taking turns proclaiming what they are capable of each day. “I can be a good student,” one little boy said before the child next to him replied: “I can listen to the teacher.” The goal is that these mantras will stay with the children hours later, when they have to sit through the more tedious lessons of the day.
An instructional coach at McKinley STEAM says the strategies are working students aren’t reaching for their phones during class and sometimes actually get drawn into lessons.

The article also explains why some teachers find this necessary:
In recent years, educators say, it has grown more challenging to get students to pay attention. Eighty-eight percent of respondents in an international survey from 2025 of more than 3,000 teachers believed their students’ attention spans were getting shorter. In a study published last year about kindergarten through second-grade classrooms in the United States, 75 percent of teachers said attention spans had dropped since the coronavirus pandemic, when the use of laptops and other technology for schooling spread rapidly. A growing body of research says that excessive screen time and short-form content such as TikTok videos are part of the problem. At least 36 states, including Ohio, have laws requiring schools to have some form of a cellphone ban.

There is debate over whether screen time reduces people’s ability to focus or their desire to — many developmental experts lean toward the latter, suggesting that it is possible to help students regain longer attention spans.

Seriously?

By markdavis • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

>“An instructional coach at McKinley STEAM says the strategies are working students aren’t reaching for their phones during class”

Why would ANY classroom allow students to “reach for their phones during class”?? And we wonder why children have zero attention spans?

I am 100% behind trying to make classes more interesting, more interactive, more engaging, more varied in approach. Not all children learn or engage in the same way. But discipline has to play a major role as well. Allowing students to be disrespectful, disruptive, or distracted has to be a hard no. And students using phones during class is outrageous.

The headline says “fight”

By MpVpRb • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

But the rest of the comment implies surrender
Instead of teaching concentration and focus, teachers are dumbing down the class to feed the students what they want

Re:“a kindergarten classroom” ???

By frdmfghtr • Score: 4, Informative Thread

This is called “Slashdot Editors Not Doing Their Jobs.” Another example is the story headline: “How Teachers Fight Students’ Shortening Attention Spans *(missing a : here)* Shorter Activities, Hands-On Projects, and Meditation.”

Re: Seriously?

By YetanotherUID • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
Any school that allows students to even have their phones on their person, let alone out, during regular school hours isn’t doing its job.

Collect them in a bin/cubbies at the start of class or require them to be put in a closed compartment under their seat, and problem solved - you can satisfy the no-risk-assesment-skills kobs panicking that they won’t be able to reach their children on the miniscule chance that there is a school shooting without permanently wrecking the quality of the kids’ education.

If kids take the phone out during class time, send them to the principal’s/give them detention (again, with no phone access) just like you would for any other major class disruption.

“75% of teachers said attention spans had dropped”

By JoeyRox • Score: 3 Thread
And the other 25% of teachers who didn’t think so had reduced attention spans themselves, so weren’t paying enough attention to notice the drop in their students.

Fans Angry Over Pokemon Go Champion’s Disqualification For Allegedly Shaking the Table

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
It’s "the curious case of… the Pokémon Go pro who celebrated too hard,” reports the gaming news site Aftermath. It all started on the first weekend in April
Firestar73, a competitive Pokémon Go player who placed seventh at last year’s world championships, managed to narrowly cinch a game-five finals win at the 2026 Pokémon Orlando Regional Championships after battling his way out of the dreaded losers’ bracket. As stress and adrenaline gave way to relief, Firestar73 stood up from his chair, threw off his headphones, raised his arms in a sort of victorious flexing motion, and then fist pumped for good measure. Immediately afterward, he politely shook his opponent’s hand… [T]he tournament’s staff went on to deem Firestar73’s conduct “unsportsmanlike” and stripped him of his win.
“After weeks of fans flooding The Pokémon Company’s social channels to demand a repeal of the ruling, the company has finally issued a statement,” reports Kotaku. “Spoilers: It will not be reverting its decision.” Their official statement?
"[D]uring game one of the bracket reset series, a player was issued a Warning for the action of hitting and shaking the table during gameplay. Actions such as these can have a negative impact on the experience of participants and disturb the match in progress. Then, during game five, this same player’s behavior continued to be disruptive, including shaking the table to the point that there was a disruption to the broadcast experience. These repeated infractions resulted in a penalty that was escalated to Game Loss. "
Meanwhile, Aftermath now reports, Firestar73 “has disputed Play! Pokémon’s account of events entirely
“The ‘incident’ you are now, for the first time, claiming was the basis of the decision did not affect the gameplay at all, yet decided the whole tournament,” he wrote on Twitter. “Section 2.1 requires a ‘clear explanation of any infraction and its penalty,’ and I was never given this as the basis at all.”

NiteTimeClasher, who won the tournament by disqualification, doesn’t seem pleased either. “Was not my decision,” he appears to have written in a Pokémon Discord. “Firestar is the Orlando regional champion. Hope you all understand.” Others have attempted to divine what the company meant by a “disruption to the broadcast experience,” and what they’ve found doesn’t look all that severe.

Not long after Play! Pokémon handed down its edict, one judge who was not involved in this particular match, Professor Rex, publicly voiced his outrage. “As a judge I’m not supposed to discuss ruling[s] publicly,” he wrote. “However, I also believe that as a judge my job is to give players a fair space to compete. If a player in a high stakes battle can lose out on thousands of dollars for shaking the table, what kind of space have we built? If the table can’t handle the intensity of the competition, that’s not the players’ fault. I’ve judged multiple Go regionals, [and] I just can’t support how this was handled.”

After posting internal correspondence meant for judges and asking “some questions they didn’t like” in the Discord for those who judge and otherwise help out at Pokémon events, Rex was banned from the Discord. That’s when, to the extent they had not already, things spun out of control. Rex went on to share judges’ personal information in a perhaps-misguided attempt at forcing transparency, which caused other judges — some of whom mostly agreed with him — to call him out and take issue with his conduct. As of now, almost no one is happy.

Alledgedly?

By Valgrus Thunderaxe • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
It’s not an allegation. He DID shake the table, twice. The question is not whether he did so, it’s whether it should result in the disqualification being discussed.

Re:Is this some weird cultural stuff?

By Team Rocket Elite • Score: 4, Informative Thread
The tournament was in the US and the initial ruling was made by local tournament staff. The appeals got escalated to The Pokémon Company International (TPCI) higher ups which overseers tournament play in most places outside of Japan. So while it isn’t possible to 100% rule out what happened behind closed doors, there is little reason to believe the Japanese side got involved especially before this starting getting media attention.

So, basically…

By jd • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Instead of dealing with the issue privately, calmly, and respectfully, the judges decided to push the issue, causing the winner and the defeated player to demand an explanation, and another judge to go nuclear. Going nuclear is rarely the best option, but is frequently the only meaningful option because the other side has made any kind of civil discourse impossible due to their conduct and attitude.

Whilst I cannot judge what happened at the tournament, as I wasn’t there, I can judge that the complete breakdown in communication was the fault of the judges - as they are the ones responsible for managing that communication and the situation. “They’re only human” is to ignore the fact that if you assume a position of responsibility, then you are the one responsible and if you’re not up to the job then that is indeed your fault. If you’re not capable of handling responsibility, then you’re not capable of handling positions of authority. It really is that simple.

Rex may have overstepped bounds, in order to try and force the judges to actually have some sense, but that is when you CALM THE SITUATION DOWN. You do NOT inflame it further. Competent figures of authority have an obligation to de-escalate situations that are spiralling out of control in order to ensure that everyone gets heard and everyone is happy - or at least happier. The judges were clearly not competent.

Does that mean Rex was competent, or that he should be given a license to violate confidences? No. He was also in a position of authority, albeit in other respects, and that means that he needed to be competent too and to de-escalate. However, I am sympathetic to his stance and feel that his attitude was probably the more understandable and rational, to the extent that the information in the OP is correct.

The players concerned are the only ones I consider to be wholly innocent in this matter and the only ones who seem to be interested in handling it maturely. They got emotional, nerds and geeks do that. And, yes, the table should have been set up to cope. They have decided who morally won, regardless of who technically won, and I consider that their right.

The outrage!

By Baron_Yam • Score: 4, Funny Thread

I suspect I’ll be able to sleep tonight. Somehow.

It’ll be a struggle knowing some guy was told he couldn’t have a Pokemon award because he couldn’t stop banging a table, but I’ll manage.

Re: So, basically…

By toutankh • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

As a volunteer international sports referee myself, Rex sounds like a dick. You don’t post internal communication. You don’t throw your peers under the bus. You don’t dox them because you disagree with their ruling.

Privacy Advocate Accuses US Government of Investing in AI-Powered Mass Surveillance

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
The Conversation published this warning from privacy/tech law/electronic surveillance attorney Anne Toomey McKenna (also an affiliated faculty member at Penn State’s Institute for Computational and Data Sciences). The U.S. government “is able to purchase Americans’ sensitive data because the information it buys is not subject to the same restrictions as information it collects directly. The federal government is also ramping up its abilities to directly collect data through partnerships with private tech companies. These surveillance tech partnerships are becoming entrenched, domestically and abroad, as advances in AI take surveillance to unprecedented levels… "
Congressional funding is supercharging huge government investments in surveillance tech and data analytics driven by AI, which automates analysis of very large amounts of data. The massive 2025 tax-and-spending law netted the Department of Homeland Security an unprecedented US$165 billion in yearly funding. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, part of DHS, got about $86 billion. Disclosure of documents allegedly hacked from Homeland Security reveal a massive surveillance web that has all Americans in its scope. DHS is expanding its AI surveillance capabilities with a surge in contracts to private companies. It is reportedly funding companies that provide more AI-automated surveillance in airports; adapters to convert agents’ phones into biometric scanners; and an AI platform that acquires all 911 call center data to build geospatial heat maps to predict incident trends. Predicting incident trends can be a form of predictive policing, which uses data to anticipate where, when and how crime may occur…

Meanwhile, the Trump administration’s national policy framework for artificial intelligence, released on March 20, 2026, urges Congress to use grants and tax incentives to fund “wider deployment of AI tools across American industry” and to allow industry and academia to use federal datasets to train AI. Using federal datasets this way raises privacy law concerns because they contain a lifetime of sensitive details about you, including biographical, employment and tax information....
The author argues that it’s now critical for Americans to know “why the laws you might think are protecting your data do not apply or are ignored.”
On March 18, 2026, FBI Director Kash Patel confirmed to Congress that the FBI is buying Americans’ data from data brokers, including location histories, to track American citizens.... But in buying your data in bulk on the commercial market, the government is circumventing the Constitution, Supreme Court decisions and federal laws designed to protect your privacy from unwarranted government overreach… Supreme Court cases require police to get a warrant to search a phone or use cellular or GPS location information to track someone. The Electronic Communications Privacy Act‘s Wiretap Act prohibits unauthorized interception of wire, oral and electronic communications.

Despite some efforts, Congress has failed to enact legislation to protect data privacy, the use of sensitive data by AI systems or to restore the intent of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act. Courts have allowed the broad electronic privacy protections in the federal Wiretap Act to be eviscerated by companies claiming consent. In my opinion, the way to begin to address these problems is to restore the Wiretap Act and related laws to their intended purposes of protecting Americans’ privacy in communications, and for Congress to follow through on its promises and efforts by passing legislation that secures Americans’ data privacy and protects them from AI harms.
Thanks to long-time Slashdot reader sinij for sharing the article.

Cui bono?

By phantomfive • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
The problem with surveillance, one of them…

I don’t like it, but I’m willing to hear arguments in favor of mass surveillance, then we can make a cost/benefit chart and compare and see how it turns out.

But they have nothing! How many terrorist events have they prevented through mass surveillance? Zero! Let the program die! We’ll save money that way.

Re: Cui bono?

By FudRucker • Score: 5, Informative Thread
I read an article a few years ago that even the NSA themselves said they collect so much data that it takes too long to sift through it to be effective at stopping a terrorist attack

H.R. 8470 - the Surveillance Accountability Act

By Shakes Fist • Score: 5, Informative Thread
https://www.youtube.com/watch?…
The Surveillance Accountability Act closes the loopholes, ends warrant-less data purchases, and for the first time creates a private right of action allowing Americans to personally sue federal agents who violate their constitutional rights.

Re:Cui bono?

By gweihir • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Mass surveillance is only useful for establishing authoritarian states. Anybody that still thinks differently does not have a working mind. As soon as these mechanisms exist, they are used for control. It has never been different and it will not be different now.

Terrorism? Nonsense. Since when are terrorists communication in ways that mass-surveillance covers? Organized crime? Same thing.

Welcome to the machine…

By mspohr • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Welcome, my son, welcome to the machine
Where have you been?
It’s alright we know where you’ve been

Welcome my son
Welcome to the machine
What did you dream?
It’s all right, we told you what to dream

(thank you Pink Floyd)

40 Years After the Chernobyl Disaster, More Countries Are Turning To Nuclear Power

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader shared this report from the Associated Press:
The 1986 Chernobyl disaster fueled global fears about nuclear power and slowed its development in Europe and elsewhere. Four decades later, however, there’s a revival around the world, a trend that has been given a big boost by war in the Middle East. Over 400 nuclear reactors are operational in 31 countries, while about 70 more are under construction. Nuclear power accounts for producing about 10% of the world’s electricity, equivalent to about a quarter of all sources of low-carbon power.

Nuclear reactors have seen steady improvements, adding more safety features and making them cheaper to build and operate. While Chernobyl and the 2011 Fukushima nuclear disaster in Japan diminished the appetite for such power sources, it was clear years ago that there probably would be a revival, said Fatih Birol, executive director of the International Energy Agency. With the war in the Middle East, “I am 100% sure nuclear is coming back,” he added…

The United States is the world’s largest producer of nuclear power, with 94 operational reactors accounting for about 30% of global generation of nuclear electricity. And it is increasing efforts to develop nuclear energy capacity with a goal to quadruple it by 2050… China operates 61 nuclear reactors and is leading the world in building new units, with nearly 40 under construction with a goal to surpass the U.S. and become the global leader in nuclear capacity. European Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen has acknowledged that it was Europe’s “strategic mistake” to cut nuclear energy and outlined new initiatives to encourage building power plants. [In 1990, nuclear energy accounted for roughly a third of Europe’s electricity, the article points out, but it’s now only about 15%.] Russia, meanwhile, has taken a strong lead in exporting its nuclear know-how, building 20 reactors worldwide…

Japan has restarted 15 reactors after reviewing the lessons of the earthquake and tsunami that damaged the Fukushima plant, and 10 more are in the process of getting approval to restart. South Africa has the only nuclear power plant on the African continent, although Russia is building one in Egypt, and several other African nations are exploring the technology… With 57 reactors at 19 plants, France relies on nuclear power for nearly 70% of its electricity.
The article includes an interactive graphic that shows the growth in the world’s nuclear capacity slowing down soon after the 1986 Chernobyl meltdown — with that capacity broken down by country. But it’s still increased by roughly 50%.

Even Ukraine — the site of the accident — now “still relies heavily on nuclear plants to generate about half of its electricity,” the article points out. But Germany “switched off its last three nuclear reactors in 2023.”

Bad faith legislation

By FeelGood314 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
In general, in the west, we are incapable of building large projects* but in the case of nuclear we passed a lot of safety legislation that didn’t add to safety but drove up costs and slowed construction. Many “environmental” groups lobbied for laws in bad faith, not to make nuclear safer but expressly to stop it. Legislators took the easy way out and approved legislation to appease groups that were never going to be appease with anything short of banning nuclear. Three Mile island demonstrated that 60s nuclear was safe. In the late 60s coal mines were going bankrupt. The “environmentalist” saved coal and in the process helped doom us to global warming.

*My city, Ottawa Canada, is taking 12 years to build a dog park in an open field. Government and competence is something only my grand parents experienced.

Re:Nuclear reactor technology

By tlhIngan • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

If people treated airplanes the same way, they’d say: some planes have crashed before, so we must never fly again.

That did happen. It’s why the French took over for a bit (and any pilot will tell you, there’s a LOT of French in aviation).

Aviation is safe because every crash leads to major investigations that lead to safety improvements (most of the time). In the 50s you used to be able to go from the street to the plane without going through security. That changed in the 60s and 70s when hijackings and bombings became common.

The problem with nuclear energy so far is that we don’t seem to be learning. Nuclear power is safe, the technology is great. The problem is, the management is the weak point. The human part. It seems every nuclear disaster was caused by a failure of management in some way - the need to get something done quickly or safety steps were bypassed in the name of efficiency.

That doesn’t happen in aviation as much - because pilots are drilled into them that there are lots of things that can go wrong and that SOPs exist for basically everything because of it. And when those get skipped, you find out sooner or later the consequences,

The problem with nuclear power is nothing to do with the technology. Its to do with the people. And not the people running the plant day to day, but the people at the very top because who knows what they’ll do to save a few bucks.

Take the mindset of a CEO looking towards the quarterlies and apply that to management of a nuclear plant. Now do you want that sort of mindset running your power plant located near your town? And if anything happens, that CEO likely has a golden parachute so it’s like any other company? Maybe even like the 2008 financial crisis? Remember, it’s these kind of people that are running the place.

Re:Nuclear reactor technology

By gweihir • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

The problem with nuclear energy so far is that we don’t seem to be learning. Nuclear power is safe, the technology is great. The problem is, the management is the weak point. The human part. It seems every nuclear disaster was caused by a failure of management in some way - the need to get something done quickly or safety steps were bypassed in the name of efficiency.

Indeed. And in the name of greed and “let somebody else fix it”. There is massive evidence that the people in the nuclear industry cannot be trusted.

The other problem is the excessive cost, the limited fuel, oh, and the constant lying about the cost when you take reactor decommissioning and spend fuels storage and actual risk-costs into account. Like the lie that “Nuclear cannot be insured”. It can be. It just makes the real risk-costs obvious. I happen to know that the back-insurers made (secret) offers when asked back when the first commercial reactors were built. But the real risk-costs killed any possibility to pretend nuclear power is cheap, so these were kept under wraps.

Oh, and also the claim about nuclear being “carbon neutral”. Not even excessively pro organizations like the World Nuclear Association are pushing that lie. Publishing skewed numbers? Yes. But claiming carbon neutral? No. (https://world-nuclear.org/information-library/energy-and-the-environment/carbon-dioxide-emissions-from-electricity).

What a crappt suggestive article

By PoopMelon • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
Painting nuclear energy to a negative side mentioning arbitrary 40 year chernobyl disaster anniversary next to increased nuclear demand. If anything should the disaster be warning about it is russia and communist party completely mishandling the incident and having zero concern for the ukrainean people living in the zone

Re:Nuclear reactor technology

By karmawarrior • Score: 4, Informative Thread

> The problem with nuclear energy so far is that we don’t seem to be learning. Nuclear power is safe, the technology is great. The problem is, the management is the weak point. The human part. It seems every nuclear disaster was caused by a failure of management in some way - the need to get something done quickly or safety steps were bypassed in the name of efficiency.

That’s pretty much true of every disaster.

A car crashes into another car. The blame will fall on: (1) the tire mechanic who installed substandard tires, (2) the owner of the car who didn’t replace the tires when they should have done, (3) the driver who didn’t apply their brakes in time, (4) the passenger who distracted the driver by talking to them at a critical moment. This is true now, it was true at the time of the model T.

A train derails at a curve. The blame will fall on: (1) the driver who was driving it too quickly, (2) the maintenance person responsible for the signal that failed before the curve, (3) the maintenance crew responsible for the rails at the curve which, due to a missing pin, failed despite the train going at the correct speed, (4)....

A Slashdot poster posts something that’s clearly wrong. The blame will fall on (1) the poster who should have checked the post before hitting submit, (2) CmdrTaco and Pudge for not implementing an edit button, (3) subsequent buyers of Slashdot for not doing necessary maintenance and adding the feature…

I mean, the point is at the end of the day, any technology is dependent upon people, and any failure is a problem with the people running and maintaining it.

Is Nuclear Power safe? Not inherently, as you appear to imply, not even close. It requires a massive infrastructure of people working together in harmony making zero mistakes to make sure there isn’t a meltdown that leads to the creation of an Elephant’s Foot or something worse. The same is true of a Boeing 747, and 747s have an “excellent safety record” but because that infrastructure isn’t ever going to be perfect, the 747 has crashed at least 65 times, resulting in 3,746 deaths.

If it requires a massive infrastructure of people working together in harmony making zero mistakes to avoid catastrophic accidents that will kill, over time, tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands of people, then it’s not “safe”.

It would be better, rather than pretending it’s safe, to consider it against the alternatives, and to determine whether those, ultimately, will kill more people. Clearly Nuclear can be compared favorably to standard coal infrastructure in that regard, at least unless someone actually invents “clean coal”, which appears increasingly unlikely. But on the other side, it’s clearly not safer than most renewables.

Is AI Cannibalizing Human Intelligence? A Neuroscientist’s Way to Stop It

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
The AI industry is largely failing to ask a key design question, argues theoretical neuroscientist/cognitive scientist Vivienne Ming. Are their AI products building human capacity or consuming it?

In the Wall Street Journal Ming shares her experiment about which group performed best at predicting real-world events (compared to forecasters on prediction market Polymarket) — AI, human, or human-AI hybrid teams.
The human groups performed poorly, relying on instinct or whatever information had come across their feeds that morning. The large AI models — ChatGPT and Gemini, in this case — performed considerably better, though still short of the market itself. But when we combined AI with humans, things got more interesting. Most hybrid teams used AI for the answer and submitted it as their own, performing no better than the AI alone. Others fed their own predictions into AI and asked it to come up with supporting evidence. These “validators” had stumbled into a classic confirmation bias-loop: the sycophancy that leads chatbots to tell you what you want to hear, even if it isn’t true. They ended up performing worse than an AI working solo.

But in roughly 5% to 10% of teams, something different emerged. The AI became a sparring partner. The teams pushed back, demanding evidence and interrogating assumptions. When the AI expressed high confidence, the humans questioned it. When the humans felt strongly about an intuition, they asked the AI to come up with a counterargument… These teams reached insightful conclusions that neither a human nor a machine could have produced on its own. They were the only group to consistently rival the prediction market’s accuracy. On certain questions, they even outperformed it…

We are building AI systems specifically designed to give us the answer before we feel the discomfort of not having it. What my experiment suggests is that the human qualities most likely to matter are not the feel-good ones. They’re the uncomfortable ones: the capacity to be wrong in public and stay curious; to sit with a question your phone could answer in three seconds and resist the urge to reach for it. To read a confident, fluent response from an AI and ask yourself, “What’s missing?” rather than default to “Great, that’s done.” To disagree with something that sounds authoritative and to trust your instinct enough to follow it. We don’t build these capacities by avoiding discomfort. We build them by choosing it, repeatedly, in small ways: the student who struggles through a problem before checking the answer; the person who asks a follow-up question in a conversation; the reader who sits with a difficult idea long enough for it to actually change one’s mind. Most AI chatbots today default to easy answers, which is hurting our ability to think critically.

I call this the Information-Exploration Paradox. As the cost of information approaches zero, human exploration collapses. We see it in students who perform better on AI-assisted tasks and worse on everything afterward. We see it in developers shipping more code and understanding it less. We are, in ways that feel like progress, slowly optimizing ourselves out of the loop.
The author just published a book called " Robot-Proof: When Machines Have All The Answers, Build Better People.” They suggest using AI to “explore uncertainty.... before you accept an AI’s answer, ask it for the strongest argument against itself.”

And they’re also urging new performance benchmarks for AI-human hybrid teams.

Nothing surprising here!

By oldgraybeard • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Using AI to (1) tell you the answer vs (2) confirm your answer vs (3) a tool to assist. Most humans will will go the route of 1 or 2 because they don’t have the thinking thing going in the first place to use 3.
Today’s AI-less(AI)(no reasoning/thinking going on here folks) will create less able humans that can’t function and don’t know how to do much of anything.

Always check sources

By TheMiddleRoad • Score: 3, Interesting Thread
Modern search AI catalogues everything. Then it finds links/sources that it summarizes. Within that, you can find the links, and from there you can actually see what pages say, some of them written by humans. Generally, when I search like this, I find answers, eventually.

Some issues…

By Junta • Score: 3 Thread

So I suppose the real point they want to make is that human consideration with GenAI input is better than GenAI alone, but there’s some issues with the first bit about comparing ‘pure human’ to ‘pure AI’.

The first sign is they are using Polymarket as a benchmark and distinct from “human prediction”, but Polymarket is just comprised of human prediction. Polymarket is comprised of humans mostly, just a tendency to be humans that are more specifically informed about the topic they are betting on.

So we see “The human groups performed poorly, relying on instinct or whatever information had come across their feeds that morning”, this suggests the humans were asked cold about random events they had not researched and further were not allowed to research, so all they had to go on was guessing on whatever they had happened to hear about beforehand. If you asked me who was going to win the presidential election in a country I’ve never heard of and demanded I don’t look, well of course my answer is going to be garbage. You could include a totally made up name as a choice and I might pick that one because I just have no way of knowing.

I would have been much more interested if they were given a minute to do a quick internet search with AI results disabled to see how well they did versus GenAI results to see if the GenAI results improved their accuracy versus a quick internet search.

Re:Nothing surprising here!

By Bongo • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Indeed. The critical thinkers did better.

The people who rely on copying what everyone else does, what the authorities say, what the consensus view is, didn’t do as well as the people who started using critical thinking systematically, i.e. western enlightenment for example, and other places where that was used. The fact that now we can have an AI in the role of authority or group think isn’t surprising when you realise it, because so often we do just rely on common patterns, authorities, and copying.

Trump Fires All 24 Members of America’s National Science Board

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
America’s National Science Board (NSB) “was established in 1950 to guide the governance of the National Science Foundation,” writes the Washington Post, “in an unusual structure within the federal government that echoes the setup of a company board in the private sector. It helps guide an agency that operates Antarctic research stations, telescopes, a fleet of research vessels and supports basic science research in laboratories across the United States.” (NSF research has helped evolve the technology used in MRIs, cellphones and LASIK eye surgery.)

But yesterday President Trump fired all 24 members of the National Science Board (NSB), the body that oversees the National Science Foundation (NSF), reports Science magazine:
In addition to advising the administration and Congress on national science policy, it has statutory authority to oversee the actions of the $9-billion NSF, setting policy and approving large expenditures. Its presidentially appointed members, typically prominent academics and industry leaders, serve 6-year terms, with eight members chosen every 2 years....

Keivan Stassun, one of the dismissed board members, says the mass firing is the latest indication that the White House is ignoring the board’s authority and dictating policies at NSF, which has been without a permanent director since Sethuraman Panchanathan resigned exactly one year ago. Stassun, an astrophysicist at Vanderbilt University who was appointed to the board in 2022, thinks the board’s public criticism in May 2025 of Trump’s proposed 55% cut to NSF’s current budget — which Congress ultimately ignored — antagonized the administration. “Maybe one way to say it from the administration’s perspective,” Stassun says, “is that this group of presidential appointees was advising the Congress to not follow the president’s wishes.”
The Washington Post adds that “The White House did not immediately respond to inquiries about why the members were terminated.”

Re:Republicans will avoid this thread

By battingly • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The people I know who identify as Republican all despise Trump though. From my perspective, the dissent and dissatisfaction is is only growing.

They despise Trump. Most of them have always despised Trump. That’s not the problem. The problem is they despise the left even more. Like most hate, that hatred is irrational, and this particular irrational hatred is founded on the baseless belief that everything wrong in their lives is the fault of immigrants, people of color, and everyone else who doesn’t look like them…in other words, the left side of the political spectrum.

Hatred is a powerful motivator and that’s what has put this country in the position it finds itself in.

Re: NSF does outstanding work, most of the time .

By fluffernutter • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
The President says jump, Congress says how high?

Re: NSF does outstanding work, most of the time ..

By Junta • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Advisors should be *advising*, not just being yes men to a megalomaniac.

The whole point is for the president to surround himself with experts and take their expertise into account, not to just have people to echo whatever he says.

Hey US

By sTERNKERN • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
You let this happen. It is ON YOU. Fucking morons.

Re: Welcome to the dictatorship!

By gtall • Score: 5, Informative Thread

I don’t think that’s it. The Republicans in Congress are like crack dealers and the Maggots are the users. The dealers issue a constant supply of bigotry and cruelty and the Maggots lap it up even though there is some part of them that knows it is go not good for them or the country but they are addicted. Every time one of them gets an independent thought, the rest are there to cow them back into subservience. The Republicans in Congress know this, and know without their drug supply, they are toast. So they keep it up.

Australia’s Teen Social Media Ban Isn’t Working. Half Their Teens Still Have Access, Survey Finds

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
After Australia banned social media for users younger than 16, teenagers "immediately worked to circumvent the restrictions,” reports Fortune:
14-year-old in New South Wales, told The Washington Post in December 2025, just before the implementation of the ban, she planned to use her mother’s face ID to log in to Snapchat and . In a Reddit thread on ways to bypass the ban, one user suggested using a printed mesh face mask from Temu to outsmart apps’ facial recognition tools. Others still have tried VPNs that obscure their locations.

A new report suggests these efforts are working. In a survey of 1,050 Australians ages 12 to 15 conducted last month, the UK-based suicide prevention organization the Molly Rose Foundation found more than 60% of teens who had social media accounts before the ban still had access to at least one of those platforms. Social media sites including TikTok, YouTube, and Instagram, have retained more than half of their users under 16. About two-thirds of young users say these platforms have taken “no action” to remove or reactive accounts that existed before the restrictions.

The survey comes at the heels of the Australian internet regulator calling for an investigation into the five largest social media platforms over potential breaches of the ban.
The article points out that “Greece, France, Indonesia, Austria, Spain, and the UK have or are considering similar action, and eight U.S. states are weighing legislation that would put guardrails or ban social media use for minors.

Shift the burden of implementation to the

By hwstar • Score: 3 Thread

social media companies. They’ll either pull out of the country/state or comply. Make it so there’s severe tort exposure if they do nothing by private right of action.

Age verification is being implemented in the wrong place. Like others have said, the endgame my be no internet access unless we know who you are.

What alternatives are they promoting?

By balaam’s ass • Score: 3 Thread

Okay, ban social media, but have they also instituted any programs to help kids socialize IRL? Because the world has largely forgotten how to do that. After school programs, sports clubs — are they pushing anything to to replace or *displace* social media to fill the void left by the social media ban?

Re:“isn’t working” is absolutist thinking.

By high_rolla • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

My guess is that the people putting this out know this perfectly well. What they are trying to do is put out propaganda to sway public sentiment that the system is not working and should therefore be scrapped. I suspect this content is being funded indirectly by the social media companies.

My fear is that the people putting this out are going to be somewhat successful in their endevours.

Re:The kids are alright

By Voyager529 • Score: 4, Informative Thread

they’d be fine with a limited flip phone

Flip phones as you remember them don’t exist anymore

Are you sure about that? Because carriers disagree.

Re:Oh no

By arglebargle_xiv • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

It is actually working, it’s cut social media use by kids by half, that’s a pretty impressive result.

Compare TFA’s headline to the following:

Australia’s Speed Limits Aren’t Working. Half Their Drivers Still Speed, Survey Finds

Colorado Adds Open-Source Exemption to Age-Verification Bill

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Colorado’s “age-attestation” bill left the House committee with new exemptions for open-source operating systems, applications, code repositories, and containerized software distribution, reports the blog Linuxiac:
[The bill] focuses on operating system providers and application stores. Its main requirement is that these providers supply an age-related signal via an interface, so applications can determine whether a user is a minor… System76 founder Carl Richell shared on Fosstodon that the updated bill now includes “a strong exemption for open source distros and apps” and has passed in the House committee. He also quoted the key part, which says Article 30 does not apply to an operating system provider or developer that distributes software under license terms that let recipients copy, redistribute, and modify the software without restrictions from the provider or developer… This wording covers Linux distributions and many open-source applications without linking the exemption to any specific project, company, or ecosystem.

The amendment also excludes applications from free, public code repositories from being considered covered applications. It also excludes code repository providers and containerized software distribution from being defined as covered application stores. This is meant to prevent platforms like GitHub, GitLab, Docker, or Podman-based distributions from being treated like commercial app stores under the bill.
“There are more steps but we’re on our way to protecting the open source community,” Richell posted on Fosstodon, “at least in Colorado.”

Cool

By darkain • Score: 3 Thread

But will my TV still need to validate my age in order to operate at all? That’s still an “operating system” that is closed source.

Re:Wonderful!

By sarren1901 • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

None of this is about keeping kids safe. It’s just baby stepping our way to killing anonymous Internet browsing and posting. The end goal is to force everyone to use government ID to do anything online.

Something people need to understand…

By Linux Torvalds • Score: 3 Thread

… is that regardless of how you personally feel about AI and LLMs, one consequences of their arrival on the scene is that there is no longer any need to be afraid to try a new operating system. Even the most arcane Linux command lines, utilities, and operating procedures have been mastered by agentic LLMs at this point. Tell the LLM what you want your computer to do, and it will happen.

In fact, the choice of operating system really doesn’t matter anymore, as long as what little legacy software you still need to run is available.

This will turn out to be a bigger deal than it looks like at first. If you’re a kid (or anyone else) who wants to use a computer without mandatory accounts or age verification, go ahead and ditch Windows and MacOS in favor of whatever Linux or BSD variant looks good to you.

Well, until the federal bill passes, anyhow

By Opyros • Score: 3 Thread
https://itsfoss.com/news/os-level-age-verification-across-us/

Is the World Ready For a Car Without a Rear Window?

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
There’s a glass roof — but no rear-view window. Instead the Polestar 4 replaces the rear-view mirror with a live feed from a wide-angle camera. Its high-resolution display (1480 x 320 pixels) promises “a panoramic view of the outside,” according to Polestar’s web site, showing more of what’s behind you. “Visibility in the dark and in rainy conditions is also vastly improved.”

Besides the camera feed (and side mirrors), the Polestar 4 offers four short-range cameras (for 360-degree views), and even short-range ultrasonics, the Wall Street Journal points out. (Car rear-view windows are usually five feet off the ground, “making a typical traffic cone invisible from closer than about 35 feet.” ) And this new design also improves “aero efficiency,” reducing drag and shearing turbulence, “critical, since the Polestar 4 is all-electric, and aero drag is the mortal enemy of range.”
[A]s a practical matter, the Polestar 4’s innovation only acknowledges what drivers already know. In many modern cars, the rearview mirror is all but useless, anyway. In a typical full-size SUV, the glass in the rear hatch is about 10 feet away from the rearview mirror, with two sets of headrests in between… Having spent a few days in what Polestar calls an “SUV coupe” I am here to report that drivers won’t miss the mirror. For one thing, the display is shaped like a conventional mirror, imbuing it with the comfort of the familiar. The imagery is convincingly mirror-like — reversed — with eye-like focal length, decent resolution and lowlight sensitivity, making it easy to trust when judging distances, with the help of graphical overlays and warning tones. It also has excellent auto-dimming algorithms....

The Polestar 4 is called that because it is the fourth model from the Swedish-Chinese premium/luxury collab, born out of Volvo Cars’ performance subbrand. Describing it as an “SUV coupe” almost feels like a translation error. The design eschews signaling traditional utility in favor of a jocund modernism — call it orbital chic.... As for missing the rear window, my advice is, don’t look back.
“In sports cars, rearview mirrors have been essentially decorative for some time,” the article points out. (The 1974 Lamborghini Countach LP400 originally envisioned “a rear-facing periscope fitted in a dorsal channel in the roof.”)

“The era’s contempt for rearview mirrors was captured in a scene from The Gumball Rally (1976) when Raul Julia’s character snaps the mirror off his Ferrari Daytona and throws it away. ‘The first rule of Italian driving,’ he says. ‘What’s behind me is not important.’"

There’s 11 exterior cameras, plus 12 ultrasonic sensors and a mid-range radar to watch for threats and “intervene if necessary”. One feature even reads speed limit signs and shows the posted limit on the driver’s display. (“If the car exceeds the limit, the driver will hear a warning sound.”) Even the windshield has built-in camera sensors to provide automatically “adaptive” headlights that switch from high beam to low beam when they identify approaching vehicles or the taillights of cars ahead.

“A total of seven airbags are deployed in the event of a collision.”

Thanks to Slashdot reader fjo3 for sharing the article.

For once, yes

By AmiMoJo • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Obviously the world is ready, because they have existed since near the dawn of automobiles.

Lots of vehicles don’t have a rear view window, or one so small it is useless. Some manufacturers, like Nissan, have been supplying rear view cameras in place of the mirror for many years too. The screen is places where the rear view mirror normally goes.

I’m just sad that side cameras didn’t replace wing mirrors. Especially now that everyone has super bright headlights, not having a mirror means no light reflected at you.

Lamborghini Countach

By Valgrus Thunderaxe • Score: 4, Informative Thread
The last models didn’t have any rear window, at all.

Re:I have a Tesla Model Y

By Ol Olsoc • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

I love the rear facing camera, it’s really useful for backing on a curvy driveway at night, and many other things One small problem. It’s really wide angle, so it gives a distorted view and makes it hard to judge distance When I’m 3 feet from an obstacle, the camera view makes it appear more like 10-15 feet

Jeep has backup lines superimposed on the image, that in conjunction with a sensor on the wheels, moves around and tells you where you will end up if you continue backing up with the wheel turned in the direction you have it. plus green, yellow, and red distance markers You can back up like a Boss, make super accurate 3 point turns, and in the woods on narrow roads with a steep drop it can be a lifesaver. If someone is coming the other way and we meet, I tell them I’ll back up. I’ve done over a quarter mile just watching the backup camera.

Re: no, plz ban this

By Tomahawk • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
I’m driving off the traffic after, not just the one car. If I can see the car in front of the car in front of me, I can react to him breaking at the same time as the car in front of me. Windows for the win!

Re: For once, yes

By paul_engr • Score: 4, Funny Thread
Are you the asshole in the lifted truck with six light bars and illegally bright HIDs? Cars of normal height are blind because of dicks in SUVs and trucks with a hood that is five feet off the ground.

Open Source Developer Brings Linux to Windows 95, Windows 98, and Windows ME

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot
Microsoft released the “Windows Subsystem for Linux” in 2016, adding an optional Linux environment into every operating system since Windows 10. But now an open source developer has brought Linux to Windows 95, Windows 98, and Windows Me, reports the blog It’s FOSS, “with Linux kernel 6.19 running alongside the Windows 9x kernel, letting both operate on the same machine at the same time.”
A virtual device driver handles initialization, loads the kernel off disk and manages the event loop for page faults and syscalls. Since Win9x lacks the right interrupt table support for the standard Linux syscall interrupt, WSL9x reroutes those calls through the fault handler instead. Rounding it all out is wsl.com, a small 16-bit DOS program that pipes the terminal output from Linux back to whatever MS-DOS prompt window you ran it from.
The end result is that WSL9x requires no hardware virtualization, and can run on hardware as old as the i486, the article points out. On Mastodon the developer says they “really got this one in right under the wire, before they start removing 486 support from Linux.”

The source code for WSL9x is released under the GPL-3 license, and was “proudly written without AI.”

Finally!

By organgtool • Score: 5, Funny Thread
I can enjoy the stability and security of a Windows 9x host with the ease-of-use of the Linux userland.

Proudly written without AI?

By TheMiddleRoad • Score: 3, Insightful Thread
I’m sorry, but software isn’t shaker furniture.

Just one question

By spaceman375 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Why? /s

Interesting use case

By CAIMLAS • Score: 3 Thread

This is really interesting for old-but-not-broken hardware you’ve got sitting around where you want to run win9x - but it isn’t well supported.

Clearly you can run W9x under emulation just fine, but there are some use cases where that’s not going to be enough (eg. you need explicit access to the hardware or there’s weird clock-related eccentricities with the software). I’m sure the use case is quite narrow, but interesting none the less. This would’ve been far cooler 20 years ago when w9x was still relevant, though.

I’m sure this project idea was kicking around in his head all that time and it wasn’t until recently that he was able to implement it (perhaps due to the assistance of AI - if not to write code, then to figure things out so he could). I’ve personally had a couple fun projects like this, where the itch could finally be scratched. Really amazing tech.

Everyone needs a hobby

By sarren1901 • Score: 3 Thread

I’m glad they did this for the fun of it but for the vast majority, this isn’t remotely practical or usable. 486 hardware? Umm, yeah not since the early 90s. Probably fine one in a museum at this point. Really, those days were terrible. Hardware was really expensive, slow and significantly more detail orientated to setup. You had to pair your ram by both size and parity, as well as setting jumpers on the motherboard. Screw this step up and you’ll fry the board and possibly the CPU as well.

Zero part of me has nostalgia for that old hardware and even less nostalgia for Windows 3.1/9x. Shit, remember you had to reboot the entire system just to change the resolution? Yeah, screw that. At least in Linux back then, you could just restart the the Xwindowing system without a reboot.

Windows XP and Win 7 were pretty much the only decent versions of Windows to ever exist. Good riddance.

Let’s see if I can recall the joke for Windows from the 90s. Something along the lines of this:

Windows 95 is 32 bit extensions and a graphical shell for a 16 bit patch to an 8 bit operating system originally coded for a 4 bit microprocessor, written by a 2 bit company, that can’t stand 1 bit of competition.

Pretty much sums up the situation.