Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Tim Cook Says Apple Price Increases Are ‘Unavoidable’ Due To Memory Costs
  2. You Can No Longer Fly Or Purchase a Drone In Beijing
  3. Brian Johnson, Special Effects Artist Behind ‘Space: 1999,’ Dies At 86
  4. China’s EV Price War Was Built On Cars Sold At a Loss
  5. Tesco Moving 40,000 Server Workloads Off VMware Amid Broadcom’s ‘Abusive Conduct’
  6. Microsoft Working To Patch ‘RoguePlanet’ Zero-Day
  7. Smartphone Market To Shrink 15% This Year Due To Memory Crisis
  8. Carvana Is Turning Dealerships Into ‘Playgrounds,’ Test-Drive Centers With Sales All Online
  9. Google, Microsoft, and OpenAI Back Linux Foundation’s Appia AI Standards Initiative
  10. Anthropic Employees Accuse Trump Administration of Targeting Them
  11. AI Will Lead To Labor Shortages, Bezos Says In Optimistic Talk
  12. Epic Games Announces Lore Open-Source Version Control System
  13. Hacking Group Claims Major Hack of Novo Nordisk, Attempted $25 Million Extortion
  14. OpenAI Losses Increased Nearly 8X In 2025, With Spending Hitting $34 Billion
  15. Stop Killing Games Fails To Secure EU Law Despite 1.3 Million Signatures

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Tim Cook Says Apple Price Increases Are ‘Unavoidable’ Due To Memory Costs

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from MacRumors:
Apple is raising its prices to offset the high cost of memory and storage, CEO Tim Cook told The Wall Street Journal. Apple is no longer able to absorb the increased prices and will need to pass some of the cost on to consumers. “Unfortunately, price increases are unavoidable,” said Cook. “We’re doing our best to mitigate the huge increases that are being passed to us, and we’ve been trying to shield our customers from the increases, but the situation has become unsustainable.”

Growing demand for memory and storage chips from AI companies has led to chip shortages and higher costs. The Wall Street Journal suggests Apple will need to increase device costs “substantially” to maintain its current profit margins given the cost of memory chips and SSDs. Research firm TechInsights claims Apple will need to make the iPhone 18 Pro around $270 more expensive to keep its existing profit margin.

Apple is struggling more with memory chips, but storage chips are also an issue. “There’s less supply at a time when consumers want devices and the memory guys are passing along huge price increases,” Cook told The Wall Street Journal. Cook said Apple will use its cash to increase memory supply, but he did not give details on what that means. Apple does not plan to create its own memory and storage factories. “We can’t do everything,” Cook said. “We know what we’re good at.”
Cook likened the memory shortages to a hundred-year flood. “I’ve never seen anything like it in any area in over 40 years,” he said.
Further reading: Smartphone Market To Shrink 15% This Year Due To Memory Crisis

You Can No Longer Fly Or Purchase a Drone In Beijing

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Longtime Slashdot reader schwit1 shares a report from PetaPixel:
China dominates the consumer drone market, so it is perhaps surprising that it is no longer possible to fly or even purchase a drone in Beijing. The new law that passed last month makes it illegal to buy, rent, or fly a drone without prior approval from the authorities. Users must also complete an online training session and pass a test on drone regulations. Under the new rules, drone users are also not allowed to repair or replace their drones in Beijing. Not only that, but a drone in a repair shop must be picked up in-person, rather than sent back by delivery.

The BBC reports that drones must now be registered before being brought into and out of the Chinese capital. “I have to apply for permission for each flight, which is very inconvenient,” drone enthusiast Steven Wang tells CNN. “And starting this year, the wait time is getting longer, and the reasons for rejection are becoming more vague.” Despite China being the birthplace of the consumer drone industry, it is increasingly difficult for hobbyists to fly there. Beijing authorities say that the rules are made to “strengthen the management of unmanned aerial vehicles” and “safeguard the security of the capital.”

Dictators

By phantomfive • Score: 3 Thread
Dictators are always afraid of their population.

And for good reasons.

Clickbait

By ArchieBunker • Score: 3 Thread

Drones now require training and a permit. Sounds accurate for a densely populated city. Next talk about motor vehicles.

Brian Johnson, Special Effects Artist Behind ‘Space: 1999,’ Dies At 86

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Special-effects designer Brian Johnson, known for his groundbreaking work on Space: 1999, The Empire Strikes Back, Alien, and Aliens, has died at the age of 86. Johnson began his career creating models and explosions for Gerry and Sylvia Anderson productions, later designed the iconic Eagle Transporter, and became one of science fiction cinema’s most influential behind-the-scenes artists. Longtime Slashdot reader sandbagger remembers the SFX legend, writing: “The Space: 1999 Eagle is one of the great space ships of science fiction.”

The Eagle

By jd • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Let’s look at the various aspects of the Eagle design.

1. It was “designed to work in space” so wasn’t designed to be aerodynamic
2. It was modular
3. Mass was kept to a minimum without compromising strength, which is precisely what you would want if your job is to carry a significant mass in space and be able to manoever without ripping apart
4. Cockpits were functional and minimal, not glamorous or more advanced than necessary to do the job

There were terrible aspects as well (nowhere to keep fuel, for example), but if you were going to design a sci-fi ship that is intended to be a simple short-range transport, then the design for the Eagle is close to perfect in a way that most sci-fi vessels really aren’t.

Brian Johnson really did a superb job of actually making something LOOK like a practical workhorse.

Re:The Eagle

By sometimesblue • Score: 4, Informative Thread
The entire body could be swapped in and out depending on the mission too, like as a cargo bay, or science lab. Moonbase Alpha lost 10 eagles across the two series, so they were probably cheap to replace too. The pilot having a big step down into their seat was an odd choice, but did look more dramatic when throwing themselves into it, readying for a quick takeoff.

China’s EV Price War Was Built On Cars Sold At a Loss

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Longtime Slashdot reader schwit1 shares a report from Autoblog:
For years, the Chinese auto industry has employed a hostile price war to kneecap global competitors. Armed with massive state subsidies, cheap raw materials, and an aggressive “scale-first” business model, Chinese automakers flooded the market with electric vehicles priced so low that legacy manufacturers stood no chance to compete. How did they do it? Simple, they couldn’t. They did it anyway. Reports from CarNewsChina show that Chinese automakers have been selling vehicles at a loss until a recent law passed by the Chinese government banned below-cost sales of new vehicles. During the ongoing sales slump in China caused by rolled-back subsidies and direct government intervention banning below-cost sales, the truth behind the rapid expansion of the Chinese auto industry has been exposed.
“By the first quarter of 2026, China captured 32 percent of the global auto market, with its New Energy Vehicles (NEVs) controlling an incredible 61 percent of global share,” the report notes. Yet that dominance has come at a steep cost: throughout 2025, “the profit margin for China’s auto industry plunged to 4.4 percent and dropped further to a historic low of 3.2 percent in early 2026.”
“Gross profit, not net profit, per vehicle, plummeted to a mere $2,000. We can expect the net figure to be loss-making.” Autoblog adds: “Data shows over 70 percent of Chinese car sales were loss-making. This left more than half of the country’s auto industry in the red. Great Wall Motor (GWM) even saw net profits drop 17 percent despite steady revenue growth.”

China’s EV price war has now hit a wall. New regulations are discouraging below-cost sales, rising material costs are forcing automakers to cut discounts and raise prices, and reduced tax incentives are weakening domestic demand. To sustain growth, manufacturers are increasingly turning to exports.

Re:Sojust like every other tech growth story

By Quantum gravity • Score: 5, Informative Thread
Western public funding is supportive, like for basic research, while GGFs pursue specific technological goals defined by the government.

Re:Sojust like every other tech growth story

By butt0nm4n • Score: 5, Informative Thread

And some of the longest working hours , people live at work, and the “party” and oligarchs live in luxury. When the workers get a break on state mandated holidays, leisure prices sky rocket and many lose out.

China has achieved amazing things with an indoctrinated and a fearful work force but it is far from perfect.

China has the same problem as the West, selfish and greedy people who don’t want to share wealth. China has the same problem we have in the West and the West is wising up to it.

Greed is a cancer killing the planet and we give it pretty names like aspiration and ambition

So what?

By BytePusher • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Tesla also didn’t make money on its cars. That’s how new businesses oftentimes work.

Re:Sojust like every other tech growth story

By AmiMoJo • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

From Europe we look at Americans that way too. Long hours, ridiculously little holiday entitlement (I just booked flights for my six week break over the new year, and I’ve still got time off to spare), and a billionaire-Epstien ruling class who live in luxury. Only they also get pollution, mass deportations, bankrupted by healthcare costs, school shootings, and so on.

China is far from perfect, but it also doesn’t compare that badly.

Re: Sojust like every other tech growth story

By hdyoung • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Um. What country are you talking about? It certainly isnt China. At least, not in this timeline. Basically, every line of your post is grossly distorted or straight up wrong. Home ownership means something totally different than in the west, and the hokou system means that huge numbers of peoples official âoehomesâ are plots of land a thousand kilometers out in some rural area. Their inflation numbers are grossly distorted by their trade policy and monetary control. Medical bankruptcy most DEFINITELY exists. Most would never admit it openly because they dont want to spend 6 months in a âoere-educationâ program, but pensions are so small and state support is so thin that people have no faith that the government will take care of them in any way at all, so they save obsessively. China has made some incredible accomplishments in the past century that the west ignores (eg a legit billion people raised out of poverty), but you are completely confused about their strengths and weaknesses.

Tesco Moving 40,000 Server Workloads Off VMware Amid Broadcom’s ‘Abusive Conduct’

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica:
Tesco, a retail conglomerate headquartered in the United Kingdom, is moving 40,000 server workloads off of VMware amid “abusive conduct” from Broadcom, recent legal filings claim. Tesco filed a lawsuit in the UK’s High Court against Broadcom alleging breach of contract last year. According to a September report from The Register, the lawsuit claimed that in January 2021, Tesco bought perpetual licenses for VMware’s vSphere Foundation and Cloud Foundation, a subscription to VMware Tanzu, plus support services until 2026, with the option to extend support for four additional years.

But when Broadcom took over VMware in November 2023, it would not honor the deal and instead tried to get Tesco to pay “excessive and inflated prices for virtualization software for which Tesco has already paid” and would not allow it to buy support services for its perpetually licensed software without buying “duplicative subscription-based licenses for those same Software products,” the initial complaint read, The Register reported at the time. Tesco, which reported 73.7 billion pounds (about $98.7 billion) in revenue in its fiscal year 2026, has since started migrating away from VMware and Broadcom’s mainframe products, according to late-May court filings reported on by The Register today.

In January, Broadcom stopped supporting Tesco’s VMware products, Tesco said, and Tesco has been paying for third-party support since. In its initial filing, Tesco also said that Broadcom refused to upgrade software or provide all security updates to customers without subscriptions. One of Tesco’s recent filings, per The Register, reads: “Faced with Broadcom’s abusive conduct, and given the criticality of virtualization and mainframe software and services to its business, Tesco has been forced to incur material costs to procure alternative solutions with reduced functionality, and to migrate to that software in a manner, and on a timeframe, that creates very significant risks to its business.”

If it works “at exceptional pace,” Tesco will be completely off VMware by the end of 2027 at the earliest. However, “the timeframe in which that migration must be undertaken has created and continues to create operational and commercial risk, and at material ongoing cost and disruption to the business,” Tesco reportedly noted. Tesco is also dealing with migration challenges related to data security because its new, unnamed virtualization software is incompatible with the Veeam and Zerto products it uses. Tesco initially requested at least 100 million pounds (about $133.6 million) in damages each from Broadcom, VMware, and reseller Computacenter, plus interest. In its recent filings, Tesco said it turned down at least four offers from Broadcom to continue using VMware and Broadcom’s mainframe tech. […] The case is expected to go to court between November 1, 2027, and February 25, 2028, The Register reported. Afterward, it could go to trial.
Further reading: HPE Tempts VMware Users, Partners With Year of Free Virtualization Software

Re:Precedent?

By Jayhawk0123 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

should be interesting like you said… Europe isn’t as quick to F over the people in exchange for corporate BS.

I hope Broadcom gets destroyed. The precedent upholding this bs is you can sell services/goods with licenses, then have another company buy you, keep all the profits from that and not honor the contracts. One can do this perpetually and grift customers and completely undermine all contracts. How this is even thought to be okay is insane, no sane logical person would look at this and think this is how contracts work and what perpetual means. Buying a company- there is due diligence done BECASUE you buy the company whole and it’s LIABILITIES… even if those are contracts you don’t like. Normally, they’d need to buy out the contract or re-negotiate first. In some jurisdictions- contract changes are a 2 party system where both need to agree on changes to the terms no matter the TOS.

Justice delayed is justice denied

By innocent_white_lamb • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

“The case is expected to go to court between November 1, 2027, and February 25, 2028, The Register reported. Afterward, it could go to trial.”

So two years later, after Tesco has completed all of the emergency work that’s required to change their IT systems to something else, then this matter will be heard.

That timeframe is ridiculous. There’s no reason why the courts can’t operate more efficiently than they do other than that the lawyers and judges have no incentive to move things along.

How many other cases are old news and no longer particularly relevant by the time they’re decided?

Re:Precedent?

By ItsJustAPseudonym • Score: 5, Informative Thread
“The precedent upholding this bs is you can sell services/goods with licenses, then have another company buy you, keep all the profits from that and not honor the contracts. One can do this perpetually and grift customers and completely undermine all contracts.”

Someting like this has happened in the U.S. with unscrupulous solar panel + loan companies. You sign a contract to get the company to install solar panels on your house, and you pay for it with a lien. Usually the company has to maintain the installation. But there have been cases where the original company goes bankrupt, and another company buys all of the loans. The new company demands the client to continue to pay them monthly, but refuses to maintain the system any more, claiming they bought the loans, not the service agreements.

Did not (and won’t) happen to me, but it’s been in the news in the U.S.

Re:Justice delayed is justice denied

By cardpuncher • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Both sides are going to want to get a great deal more evidence to support their positions - Tesco might want access to e-mails and strategy documents from Broadcom and they might want internal documents from Tesco showing what actual difficulties they encountered in migrating away. These will then have to be digested by experts capable of presenting them to the court and a case/defence built around them. All that takes a great deal of time. The aim of a civil case is to get financial restitution for the damages allegedly caused and the full amount probably won’t even be known until the migration process is complete. Filing the case allows the discovery process to begin.

Courts will only intervene urgently if there’s a threat of harm that could not subsequently be compensated adequately by monetary damages. In this case, all parties are large corporations with deep pockets whose continued trading is not in question.

Re:Justice delayed is justice denied

By ledow • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

You need to read The Secret Barrister novels, written by a real criminal-law barrister.

The UK courts are an absolute mess of chaos, that’s not the lawyer’s or the judges fault.

You would think that with a former-lawyer as the prime minister now it would get sorted, but they’ve made only token changes to an absolutely nonsensical court-appointment system that operates largely on constant fire-fighting and ill-preparedness and throwing lawyers to the wolves making them run from case to case with little to no preparation or warning.

It’s continued because “that’s how it’s always been done” but the court system outgrew the capacity decades ago.

Microsoft Working To Patch ‘RoguePlanet’ Zero-Day

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
wiredmikey shares a report from SecurityWeek:
Microsoft on Wednesday published an advisory acknowledging the public disclosure of a vulnerability in Defender that could lead to privilege escalation. The security defect, tracked as CVE-2026-50656 (CVSS score of 7.8), was dropped last week by security researcher Nightmare Eclipse (also known as Chaotic Eclipse). “We are working to provide a high-quality security update that addresses this vulnerability. We will provide information in this CVE when the update is available,” Microsoft adds.

RoguePlanet, Nightmare Eclipse explained last week, targets a race condition in Microsoft Defender and allows attackers to gain System privileges. The researcher released a proof-of-concept (PoC) exploit that demonstrates local privilege escalation (LPE) on Windows 11 and Windows 10 systems with the June 2026 patches installed. […] On Wednesday, Nightmare Eclipse pointed out that the PoC works regardless of whether Defender’s real-time protection is enabled or disabled. It may even work in passive mode, the researcher said.

In Other Words

By jrnvk • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

“the PoC works regardless of whether Defender’s real-time protection is enabled or disabled. It may even work in passive mode”… so in other words, the application that was supposed to protect organizations actually became the attack vector. Awesome!

Regression

By Canberra1 • Score: 3 Thread
So far MS has offered no excuses for the regression of multiple high severity fixes. This guy is reinforcing honesty and accountability. Some think MS can afford code reviews, duty programmers and people who can read dumps and backtrack. No lazy ‘just the minimum’. In my day the author of the defective code, had other code reviewed and fixed. Sounds like this is not being done either. Fear not, AI will soon learn and target the commit tree by the weakest coder, by date of inexperience.

working to provide a high-quality security update.

By Vomitgod • Score: 3 Thread

thats a fucking joke, right?

Smartphone Market To Shrink 15% This Year Due To Memory Crisis

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
CCS Insight expects global smartphone shipments to fall 15% this year as AI-driven demand pushes memory manufacturers toward higher-margin server chips. "[S]ome entry-level devices have already seen their sticker prices go up by more than 50 percent since last year,” reports The Register. From the report:
The firm found that the primary smartphone market (meaning new devices) contracted 4.4 percent in the first quarter of this year, despite sales channels front-loading (meaning stockpiling) product inventory, as device prices begin to rise sharply. As CCS notes, this casts an ominous shadow on the outlook for the rest of the year, and it seems things have worsened since The Register first started reporting on the smartphone memory woes.

Back in January, the forecast was for handset price rises of 6-8 percent, while the most pessimistic outlook was that the global market might contract as much as 5.2 percent. By February, analysts were expecting to see a decline in shipments of around 8 percent across the global market, and for prices to increase by about 14 percent.

The root cause of all this is the AI craze, which has seen huge demand for high-performance GPU-filled servers to process it all. Chipmakers have moved to capitalize on this by prioritizing production of high-margin memory components for those servers, rather than making the plain old DRAM and NAND needed for PCs and phones.
“The memory chip crisis shows no sign of slowing down in the near future, ramping up the pressure on manufacturers and consumers. Memory components now account for more than 30 percent of a manufacturer’s bill of materials in some smartphones.” said CCS research analyst Ben Hatton. “The full impact has yet to be felt in many regions, but it’s clear that device prices will accelerate over the rest of the year.”

It’s a bubble

By burtosis • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
If there really was a long term market for vastly more chips, the current manufacturing base would have spent the many billions to ramp up production. Instead, they just are selling to the big players for 3-4x the price+ and are neglecting the consumer market hoping they will just make short term money with nothing else changing. Jokes on them though, China is funding internally owned companies to spin up ram production to make up for demand and if it’s successful it will be a thorn in the established companies side forever even if companies find out what a Claude subscription is really going to cost and demand drops.

Re:I just had to replace a phone for a family memb

By Powercntrl • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Elections have consequences and one of them is you don’t get cool electronics anymore.

I know for you politics is like the square hole that everything fits into, but the RAM shortage is just capitalism being capitalism (and you probably know the famous saying that it’s the worst system except for everything else we’ve tried). It’s been explained to death - the RAM manufacturers are worried that if they build more capacity, the AI bubble could pop and then they’d be left holding the bag.

I’m not even sure how you’d fix this situation. Some types of businesses are just extremely expensive to start, which is also why there aren’t like 50 different competitors to Disney World.

Re:I just had to replace a phone for a family memb

By nehumanuscrede • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Left-Wing candidates have been in charge off and on about half the time since
I’ve even been alive and they have yet to do anything other than the typical
politician business-as-usual routine.

They’ve had ample opportunities to " fix " things and have done exactly squat
with it.

PS - Don’t be so quick to throw that " old fart " tag around. Given your Slashdot
ID, you’re already sailing on the edges of those waters as it is.

Surely it’s AI

By paul_engr • Score: 3 Thread
It couldn’t possibly be the fact that there has been zero innovation and a total regression of fundamental phone features and basic usability of phones.

upgrades were more meaningful

By diffract • Score: 3 Thread
Smartphones have matured enough there is very little incentive to upgrade. Same story with personal computers

Carvana Is Turning Dealerships Into ‘Playgrounds,’ Test-Drive Centers With Sales All Online

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Carvana is testing a radically different new-car dealership model in Dallas, turning the location into a test-drive center and themed “playground" while requiring every purchase to be completed through its online platform. “Every single car that we sell, whether it’s used or new, is online,” said Tom Taira, Carvana president of special projects who’s leading the new vehicle operations. “That’s a very inherent difference. Even coming into the store, you’re buying it online, and that’s a big difference in how people think about it.” The company hopes its no-haggle pricing, hourly employees, service operations, and national logistics network can reshape franchised auto retail. CNBC reports:
Through its used vehicles sales, Carvana has become the most valuable auto retailer in the U.S. with a more than $70 billion market cap. Carvana’s target with the new vehicle business is to grow its market share and customer base as well as assist used vehicle sales through trade-ins and other means, according to Taira. If the company is successful, the strategy could cause a ripple effect across the U.S. franchised dealership model, which the National Automobile Dealers Association reports includes 16,990 retailers that topped $1.3 trillion in sales last year.

[…] Carvana is using a location in Dallas as a test center for its foray into new vehicle sales. The facility looks like a traditional Stellantis dealership from the outside, but the consumer process for purchasing a vehicle and the responsibilities of its employees are unprecedented. Couches and chairs replace cubicles and sales offices. There are no finance and insurance departments, and instead of an army of commission-based employees, the facility has associates that are paid hourly to assist customers — if they want the help.

The experience is meant to be as self-guided as a customer wants. By scanning QR codes located on 10-foot-by-10-foot screens inside the building or on vehicles and displays outside, shoppers can customize a vehicle, learn about a product’s features and conduct test drives before deciding whether to purchase anything. If they do decide to buy something, it’s online and not originated from a sales person, the company said.

The “playground” has roughly 50 vehicles divided by brand, with each having a theme. Jeep has an off-road display. Dodge has race tracks, including a Carvana-themed Charger pace car and part of a traditional track fence barrier. Chrysler minivans, meanwhile, have a soccer net and Ram’s area is truck-centric. Carvana is not committing to expanding the exact experience to its other franchised dealer locations, but Taira told CNBC that the overall process of online sales, vehicle testing and service are expected to be consistent throughout the locations.
Further reading:: Online Car Retailer Launching Nation’s First Car “Vending Machine

Just give me an affordable vehicle …

By Qbertino • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

… that is robust, efficient and that I can maintain and repair myself if the need be. No?
  Ok then, get lost. Thank you.

I like it

By Local ID10T • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

As a consumer, the idea of buying a car without haggling with slimy sales and finance people is enough to make me light headed.

If they can make this work, they have my thanks. IF. They will certainly face severe headwinds from entrenched interests.

Carvana is sketchy as all Hell

By zephvark • Score: 5, Informative Thread

I tried doing business with them twice. Got approved, closed the deal (I thought), and got notified that the deal was canceled days later, before the vehicle was delivered. They claimed they saw some possible fraud in my paperwork, although they wouldn’t explain what. The first time, I’d gone through their own bank and insurance, so I assumed one of them had screwed something up. The second time, using my own bank and insurance… got the same result. My driver’s license is certainly legit, so what else could have gone wrong? They weren’t saying.

I have no idea what kind of scam they’re running but, they don’t seem to be in business to sell cars.

Good, dealer laws need to go

By jacks smirking reven • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

For the obvious reasons that are all being discussed here but in particular car dealers have a tendency to be some of wealthiest business owners in an area and they are overwhelmingly Republican and actively lobby (I think there are a few dealer owners in the House) as well, so for me, if I was in charge in a state reducing their power would be a political imperative as much as a consumer one (really they are intertwined).

  Inside a Key Part of the Republican Base: Car Dealers

Want to Stare Into the Republican Soul in 2023?

For example NADA lobbies over 70% R

https://www.opensecrets.org/industries/indus?ind=T2300

Unsurprised that Stellantis is willing

By argStyopa • Score: 3 Thread

…they’re fucked.
Their inventory is insanely high. And worse, it’s OLD.

They kept running production full tilt, forcing dealers to take new production AND FORBIDDING THEM offering deals to customers to clear old stocks. They kept trying to sell to the top of the market and nobody’s interested.

So their dealers are closing left and right, going bankrupt because they can’t service the sustain costs on their inventory (they don’t precisely own the cars in their lots) and as few people that are willing to buy a new JEEP for $120k, there’s even fewer willing to pay $120k for a “new” 2024 model that’s been sitting on the lot for 3 years. Drive that off the lot and you don’t lose 30% value, you lose 60% or more.

I’m not in that business, but from what I understand their collapse is a “when not if” proposition. Not shocked that when Carvana looked for someone willing to be their playground, Stellantis was willing and had dealerships that would take anything for some inflow of cash and maybe even customers.

Google, Microsoft, and OpenAI Back Linux Foundation’s Appia AI Standards Initiative

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
BrianFagioli writes:
Google, Microsoft, OpenAI, Arm, Mastercard, Siemens, and other companies have joined the newly launched Appia Foundation under the Linux Foundation. The project aims to create common specifications and assessment frameworks that organizations can use to demonstrate AI systems meet emerging safety, trust, and compliance requirements. According to the Linux Foundation, the framework is designed to allow conformity evidence to be reused across the AI supply chain, potentially reducing duplicate assessments and compliance costs. The announcement comes as governments around the world move toward enforcing AI regulations and organizations face increasing pressure to prove AI systems are trustworthy.
“As international standards and legal frameworks become more established, global organizations need a consistent, practical way to verify that AI systems conform to new expectations,” said Jim Zemlin, CEO of the Linux Foundation. “The Appia Foundation establishes a neutrally governed environment where the entire industry can collaborate on a common assessment framework. By building this infrastructure in the open, we are helping organizations reduce complexity, lower operational costs and build trust.”
Craig Shank, Executive Director of the Appia Foundation, added: “AI systems now make decisions about people’s loans, their children’s schools and their jobs. People on the receiving end deserve to know those systems were built and assessed against criteria that hold up to scrutiny. The Appia Foundation was formed to do that work: creating publicly available specifications that organizations across the AI value chain use to demonstrate their systems meet those criteria. By establishing this open framework, we are building the accountability layer required to scale safe and trusted AI across major industries.”

Anthropic Employees Accuse Trump Administration of Targeting Them

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Anthropic employees say they remain confused and increasingly convinced that the Trump administration is singling out the company after officials gave it less than 90 minutes to disable Fable 5 and Mythos 5 over alleged national security concerns. Cybersecurity experts, however, argue that the cited behavior of helping to identify vulnerabilities in software is also available in rival models and is more valuable to defenders than attackers. The New York Times reports:
Inside the company, employees’ private group chats immediately lit up. Managers were instructed to prepare customers for a potential service disruption to the models, called Fable 5 and Mythos 5. But the messaging kept changing, with workers initially being told that the security problem was the ability of foreign companies to gain access to the systems, and later that a major vulnerability had been discovered in the models.

In employee chats, Anthropic engineers asked one another if the company’s plan to go public this year would be harmed by the White House directive. Many shared news reports that offered conflicting information about why the White House had ordered Anthropic to suspend access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5 for all foreign nationals. “What are you telling your clients?” one employee asked in a chat viewed by The New York Times. Another said, “Does anyone know what to believe?” In another message, a worker said, “I don’t understand what the issue is.”

Six days later, Anthropic’s roughly 3,000 employees still have few answers. The San Francisco company is continuing to grapple with internal confusion as Dario Amodei, the chief executive, and some of his lieutenants meet with the Trump administration to try and resolve the situation. But after discussions on Monday and Tuesday, there was no breakthrough over ending the U.S. order to limit access to the company’s new A.I. models. In a statement on Monday, Anthropic said it would continue meeting with government officials and pledged its “ongoing commitment to working alongside the administration.”

The dispute highlights how singular Anthropic has become in Washington. It was the second time in six months that the fast-growing A.I. start-up has become embroiled in a fight with the Trump administration over its powerful technologies, even as other A.I. companies offer similar models that have not received the same attention. And it has left Anthropic’s employees in what they described as a holding pattern, with some wondering if they were being picked on by President Trump. “Are we being bullied based on bad vibes?” one employee asked in a chat viewed by The Times.
Yesterday, TechCrunch’s Zack Whittaker argued that the move sets a troubling precedent: the government can unilaterally disrupt American software products without court approval, potentially undermining trust in U.S. AI providers.

They’re being made an example for others

By Schoenlepel • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

It’s not about whether others have the same capability; it’s because Anthropic refused to allow the US government to use their AIs to be involved in combat action. They’re being turned into an example: “this is what happens to you when you refuse to do as we tell you to.”

Trump really is a fascist and all tech companies should stand together against that clown. However, there’s two things in the mix here which prevent them from standing together: 1) They’re actually afraid, 2) They smell money. Anthropic will be bust soon and when that happens, Trump or some other clown in that government will make a remark which will come down to “Anthropic was your example, you could be next.” Of course not literally that, it will be stated such they can wiggle themselves out from under any wrongdoing allegations, but still, the announcement will be made as soon as Anthropic is off the stage.

Re:They’re being made an example for others

By caseih • Score: 5, Informative Thread

This is incorrect. Anthropic’s deal with the DoD absolutely did involve the use of their models with combat. But the deal signed said that humans would always have the final say (and thus responsibility) for lethal combat action. That was what was agreed by both parties. But the DoD decided to change the terms of the deal and remove the bit about human responsibility. That was something Anthropic rightly disagreed with and besides it wasn’t the agreement the DoD signed.

Funny how this bit gets quickly forgotten.

Fucking Duh!

By SlashbotAgent • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Hegseth literally told them that they would be targeted for retaliation if they didn’t allow the DoD to use their AI without restrictions.

Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth is threatening unprecedented retaliation, potentially labeling Anthropic as a “supply chain risk.” This designation could destroy Anthropic’s business ahead of their expected initial public offering (IPO).

Anthropic held their ground and refused the contract. They are totally on the shit list.

Re:Of course not!

By XXongo • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

You leftists wanted strong government, well, there you have it. You should be happy.

Leftists don’t want strong government, they want government that benefits the people. Does this benefit the people?

Re:What is socialism?

By jacks smirking reven • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Clinton left office with a budget surplus

Over half of our debt since then is the result of both the 2001 Bush tax cuts and the 2017 TCJA.

Another big chunk is the money Obama had to spend to bail us out from the mess he was left with in 2008 and Biden was left with a similar mess to clean up in 2021 but when they have to spend a bunch of money they get harangued by the same party that caused the issue. It’ll happen again when the next Democrat has to clean up a mess in 2029.

I would submit to you that if you think the two parties are the same you’re not just a fucking moron but a dishonest political actor with an ulterior motive.

Example to your link: there is a bill to ban Congressional Stock trading, why no Republican co-sponsors? Just like AOC rightly pointed out when asked about gerrymandering: There’s a bill on the floor to ban all partisan gerrymandering, why no Republicans vote for it?
.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/…

AI Will Lead To Labor Shortages, Bezos Says In Optimistic Talk

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Reuters:
Artificial Intelligence will lead to labour shortages, not the replacement of humans, Amazon founder Jeff Bezos predicted in a highly optimistic appearance at the VivaTech technology conference in Paris on Wednesday. Bezos put forward a rosy vision of how technology will help humanity, speaking about projects including his space venture Blue Origin and his new AI startup Prometheus, which is aimed at speeding up physical manufacturing. “I know there’s a lot of concern that many people have, including many smart people, that AI is going to make humans redundant and so on,” Bezos said. “I totally disagree with this point of view. And I think, in fact, AI is going to create a labor shortage.”

Half of Americans fear the rise of AI could put them or someone in their household out of work, a Reuters/Ipsos poll found this month. Bezos, the world’s fourth-richest person with a net worth around $250 billion, argued that people have “endless” things to do, and are currently limited by barriers that he said AI would lower. One goal of space exploration is to move polluting industries off Earth, said Bezos, whose Blue Origin aims to compete with trillionaire Elon Musk’s SpaceX in rockets. “If space travel gets reliable enough and inexpensive enough, and we can get materials from asteroids and near-Earth objects and the moon, then this garden planet can be returned to its pre-Industrial Revolution state,” Bezos said.

Re:Correction

By nomadic • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

The elites hate labor shortages. They love labor surpluses.

Hallucinated out of his ass

By Vrallis • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I think Bezos hallucinated this out of his ass…or at least “generatively created” it.

Optimism

By belthize • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Any time a billionaire effectively states the biggest problem facing the masses in the future is too much money I always feel very relieved.

Well…

By LordHighExecutioner • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

…I work in the R&D dept. in a F500 company. Today we had a meeting with our manager, and discussions were all about AI forthcoming applications in our company. The problem of unemployement caused by AI was raised by one od us, as we feared that somebody could be replaced. Our manager was instead very happy about AI, and she told us that now all her slides and reports are quickly prepared using Copilot AI. We - the employees - looked each other smiling…it was now clear who could be replaced by AI soon.

The Internet is a fad

By broward • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

this comment will rival Gates’ clueless comment that “The Internet Is A Fad”.

Bezos apparently has no grasp of history -

https://www.scry.llc/2024/12/2…

“Keynesian theory is right. The real cause of economic depressions is the mismatch between production time and consumption time which occurs gradually as productivity rises. Governments then create make-work jobs in a haphazard attempt to maintain consumption (equilibrium). Eventually, the impedance mismatch leads to collapse and a new system. We are probably on the verge of that change.”

Epic Games Announces Lore Open-Source Version Control System

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Epic Games has released Lore, an MIT-licensed version control system written in Rust and designed specifically for “games and entertainment purposes with large file sizes,” reports Phoronix. From the report:
While there is Git LFS for large file storage with Git, Epic Games has crated Lore as a version control system designed entirely around the large file needs of modern game development as well as multimedia/entertainment purposes. Lore is designed to be fast and efficient for large files including binary files, and be easy-to-use including for 3D artists and more.

The Lore documentation elaborates more on its differences and motivation for development compared to Git: “No existing system was designed for the combination of constraints that large game and entertainment projects require: arbitrary content types, multi-axis scale, multi-tenant safety, and a fully open specification and license. […] Lore is designed to combine what works in each (Git’s content-addressed revision graph and centralized systems): a centralized server-of-record for durability, access control, and conflict resolution; content-addressed storage with fragment-level deduplication that is as effective on a multi-gigabyte binary as on a kilobyte of text; sparse, lazy working copies that materialize only what you need; free branching; and a fully open, publicly versioned specification and MIT license. Normal editing operations — staging, committing, branching, diffing — never require a network round trip.”
You can learn more at Lore.org. All the code is available on GitHub.

Storing ‘Data’

By bill_mcgonigle • Score: 5, Funny Thread

It’s all well and good until Lore steals Data’s emotion chip.

This could actually be great!

By Oh really now • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
I haven’t dug too deeply in the details, but possibly might help in my environment. Maybe. Depends on the people. My art department has a huge file storage problem because they angrily insist on storing all of their collaborative work on a single SMB share. Worse, they choose to work directly on the NAS because that’s how they linked all the assets within their documents. Invariably, they clobber each others work, and Adobe products randomly blow up files. I periodically snapshot the volume but that’s more of a bandaid than a solution. The only problem moving them to a version control system is I’m not quite sure they’d understand enough to use it. They struggle a LOT with the concept of file locations, file times, etc. and literally believe “the system” stores each change they make as they make it. Worse they huff when they find out we can’t go back through each change for them. One dude literally said “the system” only stored some of his edits despite there clearly only being one new file revision on disk.

Perforce

By ajedgar • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Perforce does all of that (and provides Git compatibility) but is not open source. In fact Epic games uses Perforce extensively, so this is there way of getting out from under the licensing fees.

https://www.perforce.com/

Hacking Group Claims Major Hack of Novo Nordisk, Attempted $25 Million Extortion

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Reuters reports a cyber extortion group has claimed responsibility for breaching Novo Nordisk’s network, stealing roughly 1.3 terabytes of data, including source code, drug research, clinical-trial records, employee and physician information, production-system details, and internal AI model data. The group says it’s exploring selling parts of the data after unsuccessfully demanding $25 million from the company. From the report:
FulcrumSec, a cyber extortion group that emerged in October 2025, said in a long message posted to its website that it spent more than two months in Novo Nordisk’s networks stealing data. It said that data included company source code, proprietary information on released and unreleased drugs, trial data, employee, doctor and patient data, information related to company processing facilities and internal AI model information.

[…] FulcrumSec told Reuters in an email that Novo Nordisk representatives contacted the group on June 3, roughly 48 hours after the group’s initial contact to unnamed company executives. The company used a random Proton Mail email address sent to email addresses that FulcrumSec used in its initial outreach, and confirmed it was the company by requesting specific files for verification only the company would know about.

The FulcrumSec representative also said that the group would prefer not to sell data, “as open sourcing it is a more effective deterrent for future companies to avoid paying.” […] FulcrumSec said it would not share some of the data it stole, including information on thousands of company employees and physicians, and roughly 11,500 pseudonymized clinical trial patients. The group said it also would withhold data related to operational technology and software used to interact with sensors and machinery at Novo Nordisk production facilities as part of its “harm-reduction strategy.”
A Novo Nordisk spokesperson said in an email that the company “is aware of claims that data allegedly copied externally without authorization from our systems has been published online. We take this matter seriously and maintain continued operations of our main platforms. We are in contact with the relevant authorities.”

India strikes again

By CEC-P • Score: 3 Thread
I cannot name one single American large medical provider or pharma company that doesn’t outsource its IT engineering and maintenance to clueless Indian companies who rush everything, lie about credentials, and generally just don’t give a shit. Hmm, I wonder what led to this.

Re:India strikes again

By ArchieBunker • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Hmm, I wonder what led to this.

The bean counters and finance bros have calculated the risks to be acceptable.

OpenAI Losses Increased Nearly 8X In 2025, With Spending Hitting $34 Billion

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from independent journalist Ed Zitron:
Today, I can exclusively report, based on audited financial documents viewed by this publication that have been independently verified by the Financial Times, that OpenAI lost around $38.5 billion in 2025, as well as other crucial details about the financial condition of the company. […] At the end of the year, OpenAI had just over $50 billion in assets, with almost half of that in cash. […] The financial condition of OpenAI is deeply concerning. $38.53 billion in losses are astronomical, and far higher than most believed it would be. Losses also appear to be mounting year-over-year at a dramatic rate, and I’m not sure how this company finds a way toward any kind of sustainability or profitability. As discussed, I have not editorialized much today. I believe the best thing I can do for the general public is to deliver this news as plainly as possible.
Ars Technica’s Kyle Orland offers a more editorial take, writing:
All told, OpenAI’s day-to-day “loss from operations” increased from $8.78 billion in 2024 to $20.92 billion in 2025, a concerning direction for a company that is telling investors it hopes to be profitable by 2030. But measured as a percentage of revenues, the company’s operating losses slightly improved year to year, from 237 percent in 2024 to 160 percent in 2025.

Operating numbers aside, OpenAI’s headline “net loss” number of just over $5 billion in 2024 ballooned to nearly $39 billion in 2025. But the 2025 number includes a significant accounting charge related to investor valuations that shifted amid the company’s 2025 conversion to a for-profit structure. The Financial Times cites “a person familiar with the matter” in reporting that this non-recurring charge was approximately $30 billion and that OpenAI’s 2025 net loss amounted to a more reasonable-looking $8 billion without it.

The cost of force

By karmawarrior • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

So you have something that nobody is asking for (not in the way genAI is anyway), and you decide, of all things, rather than making a case for it, you force people to use it, in the hope they get addicted, think they can’t do without it, and continue using it after you start pricing it at profitable levels.

This is the business model. Why are they not making a case for it? Why are they, instead, pretending it’s something it isn’t? Because nobody would take it seriously if they did the latter. The only way they can get people to use it is via force, and that means persuading idiot CEOs with a FOMO issue, while pricing it well below cost.

The question isn’t “Will they make a profit”, that’s not something you or I should care about. Who gives a crap if a bunch of vulture capitalists get busted? The question is “How much damage will they do with this particular con job”.

The end game of this, remember, is to get companies dependent upon genAI companies. To make them unable to function any more without handing over control of their systems to the genAI people. And idiot FOMO CEOs who have gotten the dopamine rush from using genAI tools are making sure their companies will be run that way, despite the obvious dangers.

So the answer to “How much damage” is, so far, a crazy amount. So far. There are now many, many, companies that have lost control and knowledge of how their own businesses run. And it’s getting worse.

Good Luck With the IPO

By 0xG • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Good luck with the IPO, this might put a damper on things.

Spending 3X your revenue

By OrangeTide • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Spending more than your revenue with no answer to when it turns around is a recipe for a bubble.
Yet OpenAI is not the worst offender by a long shot.
ref: Is AI Profitable Yet?

Signed integer

By goombah99 • Score: 5, Funny Thread

well once they crossed 2 billion the signed integer representation made losses into profits

Zitron misses the bigger picture

By zmollusc • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Ed Zitron completely fails to take into account the four factors which will inevitably lead to massive profitability for the AI firms. These are:
1 Stuff
2 Things
3 Misc
4 Other

This is not just my view, it is the informed opinion of experts in the AI field.

Stop Killing Games Fails To Secure EU Law Despite 1.3 Million Signatures

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot
The European Commission has declined (PDF) to propose a law requiring publishers to keep discontinued video games playable, despite the Stop Killing Games initiative collecting nearly 1.3 million verified signatures. Instead, it plans to develop a voluntary industry code covering end-of-life transparency and preservation. Dextero reports:
The Commission’s full communication said a legal obligation to keep games playable, as requested by the initiative, “would not be proportionate.” It cited concerns about intellectual property rights, confidential business information, publisher costs, and potential cybersecurity or safety risks once games are no longer supported. The code of conduct could include more transparent storefront labeling about possible game discontinuation, along with more partnerships between publishers and cultural heritage institutions to preserve games. However, it would not legally require publishers to provide offline patches, private server tools, or other methods for players to continue accessing games after official support ends. The Commission also argued that existing EU consumer law already provides some safeguards, including requirements around transparency, contract duration, termination conditions, and possible refunds if a shutdown conflicts with the agreement or a consumer’s reasonable expectations.

[…] Despite the setback, Stop Killing Games has said it is not ending its push for legislation. In a response posted after the Commission’s decision, the official Stop Killing Games account said the outcome was “not unexpected” and claimed the campaign had already prepared for the result. The group said it is now pushing for members of the European Parliament to amend Stop Killing Games into the Digital Fairness Act instead. “We can move on without the Commission and their non-decision,” the group said, referencing earlier comments from Accursed Farms creator Ross Scott.

Commissions position does not matter

By Zarhan • Score: 5, Informative Thread

As it says on the summary already - the fact that we got a non-answer from commission doesn’t matter here. It would have been *nice* to get a legislation from there, but in the end they don’t matter.

Ross Scott explains it better at https://youtu.be/CgoODQFrPgw?t… but the point is that SKG already has majority support in European Parliament, and the plan is basically that SKG gets tacked on by the parliament as an amendment to Digital Services Act (https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/digital-services-act). The DSA is already supposed to do things like rein in lootboxes, so it’s already addressing issues for video games.

Commission’s stance ultimately does not matter here at all. No need to be discouraged.

Re:Commissions position does not matter

By Zarhan • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Sorry, wrong piece of legislation in progress - meant Digital Fairness Act, not Digital Services Act. https://digitalfairnessact.com…

Copyrigh

By MeNeXT • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

was created so artists would release their work to the public and be compensated. So why do we offer copyrights on stuff that is not made available or removed from the market.

How about we change the law into something that removes copyright when it’s not available, or no longer available.

We need to change the laws that allow lock in, or that change the terms after purchase.

Re: Instead, it plans to develop a voluntary indus

By thegarbz • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Has any voluntary industry code and self regulation EVER worked?

Yes. Good examples can be found the world over: Media advertising standards, financial standards, heck the entire engineering profession is self regulated by its own industry. Many reporting standards are as well. As are quite a few product safety standards (the overall “don’t kill people” is law, but how to achieve that is mostly driven by industry self-regulation in many parts of the world).

Now there’s plenty of examples where it also didn’t work, and those often get followed up with actual laws, but there are still plenty of examples in industry where industry codes self regulated. For example when America shat itself in 2008 Australia was largely insulated from the same problems due to the Australian Banking Association’s (industry body) governance code that effectively banned the kind of sub-prime finance dumb-fuckery in the country years earlier.

Want another example? It’s not legally required in most of Europe to label vegan products, yet industry has adopted ISO 23662 despite it not being required by any law to do so. And while we’re talking about standards, the harmonisation of electrical standards in the EU was almost entirely industry driven, and except for subtleties of specific wiring rules for examples in houses, most electrical standards maintained by CENELEC are entirely voluntary yet followed throughout all industry.

Re: Instead, it plans to develop a voluntary indus

By almitydave • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

When it’s codified into the highest law of the land and doesn’t work, and suggestions to do so voluntarily can’t work to the point of being laughable, what options do we have left?

There’s always Nancy Reagan’s catchphrase: Just Say No.

Any particular game is expendable. You won’t miss out on anything. Games don’t even have the network effects and lockin that you get with other types of software; it’s a part of the economy where Just Saying No is easiest of all.

Except when it’s not. It’s not always clear at the time of purchase that the publisher has the ability to shut down the game at some unspecified future date. So “just saying no” requires some knowledge of the future that may not be available. In addition, on platforms like Steam, publishers can push updates that you *must* install to continue playing which remove features or add an online requirement that didn’t exist when you purchased it, leading to it being disabled remotely when the publisher eventually shuts down the servers. The TOS/EULA generally require that you agree to all future updates to the TOS/EULA without notice or ability to opt out, so the consumer really doesn’t have any actual rights to the games they “purchase” in this system.

Even if the outcome of Stop Killing Games isn’t legislation that requires publishers to create tools or release code, an acceptable outcome (IMHO) would be regulation that requires transparency, labeling, and prohibits what’s effectively sabotage so the consumer can make an informed decision and have some guarantee they get what they actually paid for. If a digital storefront carried a disclaimer that said “This game requires an online connection to the publisher’s server to run. The publisher has not guaranteed the server’s operability for any length of time” then a user would at least have the opportunity to consider that risk when purchasing. Additionally, if a regulation prevented publishers from deploying an end-of-life update (a “time-bomb”) that didn’t exist when purchased, that would also protect consumers without harming publishers. So there are some easy approaches here which don’t burden publishers.

Personally, I’d like to see a law that stipulates that any digital good to which your access can be removed by the publisher must be described as either a “rental” or “subscription”, with the length of the term clearly spelled out, with penalties for revoking access before the end of the term. That way, you can know exactly what you’re getting, for how long, and can count on it being there; and publishers can’t trick you into thinking you’re “purchasing” something you aren’t. As much as I love Steam, I’m aware this would include the entire Steam library. The most obvious downside to me is that this would likely lead to the normalization of the idea that you don’t own your video games in general.