Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Trump’s CTFC Steps In to Defend Kalshi As Utah Brings Criminal Charges Against Execs
  2. Multi-Billion Binance Hack Hitting Crypto Markets
  3. Patrick Stewart, ‘Star Trek’ Captain and ‘X-Men’ Superhero, Dies At 86
  4. Nvidia Chief Seen As Target of Chinese Spy Plot
  5. Alphabet Heads For a $500 Billion Drop In Market Value
  6. Canada to Join EU Network of Supercomputers
  7. DoorDash Strikes $17 Billion Deal For US Rival Instacart
  8. Reddit Is Getting a ‘For You’ Feed
  9. ‘Please Let the Internet Die’
  10. Google Struggling to Make AI Mode Searches Pay
  11. Ink Droplets In Motion Snag Top Prize In Nikon Small World Contest
  12. Bank of America Kindly Asks That You Don’t Share Your Password With Your AI Assistant
  13. Anthropic Engineer Declares the Coding Interview Dead
  14. Massive Leak Exposes 41,000 Homeland Security Workers
  15. Amazon Puts a Camera In Its Echo Studio So Alexa Can See

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Trump’s CTFC Steps In to Defend Kalshi As Utah Brings Criminal Charges Against Execs

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has sued Utah to defend its claimed exclusive authority over federally registered prediction markets, as the state files (PDF) 14 criminal charges against Kalshi and its co-founders for allegedly violating anti-gambling laws. The Verge reports:
On Wednesday, Utah’s Attorney General Derek Brown filed charges against Kalshi co-founders Tarek Mansour and Luana Lopes Lara, including 12 counts of online gambling promotion, a third-degree felony, one count of a pattern of unlawful activity, a second-degree felony, and general gambling promotion, a Class A misdemeanor. The civil lawsuit calls Kalshi a “back-alley gambling den,” and Attorney General Brown didn’t mince words in a statement to Gizmodo.

“Gambling is illegal in Utah, whether you place the bet, run the game, or promote it. Calling it a ‘prediction market’ doesn’t change what it is, and being federally registered doesn’t put a company above the law,” said Brown. “A federal court has already ruled that Utah’s gambling laws apply to Kalshi,” continued Brown. “Kalshi kept taking bets from Utahns anyway. That is illegal, and we’re putting a stop to it.”

[…] The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has been jumping into action to protect Kalshi and Polymarket by filing lawsuits against any state that brings charges against the betting sites. President Trump’s son, Donald Trump Jr., is a paid advisor to both companies. The CFTC announced Wednesday that it was suing the state of Utah as part of its “commitment to maintaining its exclusive jurisdiction over CFTC-registered prediction markets.” The argument is that the feds alone should be regulating these sites.

“Utah seeks to shut down prediction markets across a wide variety of markets,” CFTC Chairman Michael S. Selig said in a statement. “Event contracts do not just serve hedging and investment purposes — they also provide the public with information about the outcome of future events. Congress entrusted the CFTC to be the federal regulator with sole responsibility to oversee these markets,” continued Selig. “As I’ve said before, the CFTC has the expertise and responsibility to defend its exclusive jurisdiction over commodity derivatives, and that’s exactly what we’ll do.”

Too obvious

By drinkypoo • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

The corruption is just too obvious here, it cannot be anything but an attack on our financial systems designed to cause delay and disarray.

Orange pedophile

By rsilvergun • • Score: 3, Insightful • Thread
Even without the context we all know who I’m talking about.

I bring it up because dear God this administration is corrupt and in light of the subject of this comment what the hell was anyone expecting?

I think the real problem is about 25% of the population of any given country or dyed in the wool assholes.

From there all you have to do is push people to enough desperation that their brain stop working right. People under enormous amounts of pressure don’t suddenly get better or smarter. They make bad decisions and they make more of them.

Like believing a famous pedophile who bankrupts everything he touches is somehow going to reduce the cost of groceries. Somebody who can think straight knows better than that.

Lemme fix that title

By angryman77 • • Score: 4, Informative • Thread
“Trump’s CTFC Steps In to Defend His Family’s Financial Interests As Utah Brings Criminal Charges Against Execs.”

Multi-Billion Binance Hack Hitting Crypto Markets

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Binance is investigating a potential hack after more than $2 billion in crypto was drained from one of its wallets into a new external account, with Blockaid estimating nearly $3.3 billion was moved.

“Our teams are aware of reports of a potential security issue and are actively investigating,” said Binance on X.

“User funds are safe,” said Binance founder CZ. “It does look like a hack on Binance. Appreciate the quick freeze from Tether (~$971m) and Circle (~$823m). I don’t manage Binance anymore, but as a shareholder, I expect all user funds will be fully covered.”

rug pull

By awwshit • • Score: 3 • Thread

$ rug pull
Access Denied.

$sudo rug pull
Transferring $5.6B…

Patrick Stewart, ‘Star Trek’ Captain and ‘X-Men’ Superhero, Dies At 86

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Slashdot readers Cpt_Kirks, eklektic, sconeu, and Vrallis share the unfortunate news of Patrick Stewart’s passing. Longtime spokesperson Kelly Bush Novak said Stewart died Wednesday at the age of 86 at his home in Los Angeles following “a brief and poignant journey with Alzheimer’s disease and Lewy body dementia.”

“He has been held in the warm embrace of family and friends, surrounded by live music, prayer, tears, laughter and the kind of profound emotion that only he could inspire after a lifetime of devotion to us all,” Bush Novak wrote. “We will forever cherish the peaceful ease and reflection on his face, an enduring reminder of his invincible grace.”

The acclaimed British actor became a science-fiction icon as Capt. Jean-Luc Picard in Star Trek: The Next Generation and Professor Charles Xavier in the X-Men films. Beyond those iconic roles, Stewart earned multiple Emmy and Golden Globe nominations for performances in Moby Dick, The Lion in Winter, Extras, Hamlet, and Blunt Talk. He later returned to his most famous role in Star Trek: Picard.

Farewell

By LondoMollari • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Rest in peace, Captain. Engage.

Darmok

By Gilgaron • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
Shaka when the walls fell

Don’t forget Julius Ceasar

By drnb • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
Before he was chosen for Picard in TNG I coincidentally saw him in some old BBC production of Julius Caesar on late night cable (or was it the weird VHF channel for local broadcast, not channels 2-13, IDK). When the TNG cast was announced I actually recognized him. I thought it was going to be interesting to have a trained British Shakespearian Actor as a “Star Trek” captain. Turns out it worked out pretty well.

Lewy body dementia

By awwshit • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread

In some forms of dementia you do not realize that you are losing it. With Lewy body dementia, you know it.

My uncle had Lewy body dementia, he new it. He would tell us all how he did not want to be a burden and how he just wanted to die. Very hard on everyone.

Re:Darmok

By ObliviousGnat • • Score: 4 • Thread

Kamin and Batai, at rest.

Nvidia Chief Seen As Target of Chinese Spy Plot

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from The New York Times:
American spy agencies had gathered striking intelligence. A top executive at a Singapore-based data center company was under scrutiny for possibly steering advanced Nvidia A.I. chips to China. And now American officials had concluded that she was a Chinese intelligence asset (source paywalled; alternative source), funneling information to Beijing. But what came next was even more alarming. Surveillance of the executive, Alice Huang or Huang Le, a Chinese citizen, revealed that she had developed a close relationship with Jensen Huang, Nvidia’s chief executive.

For years, Washington has worked to deny China the technology needed to match or surpass the United States in the intense global competition for superiority in artificial intelligence. The discovery that Beijing was getting reports from someone with direct access to Mr. Huang, one of the most powerful figures in the A.I. revolution as well as an influential ally of President Trump’s, set off alarms at the White House. Roughly a year ago, Mr. Trump was briefed about the intelligence findings, which have not been previously reported, and chose not to do anything with the information. Mr. Trump has been wary of disrupting Nvidia’s chip sales, which are helping to drive the economy and the stock market, and of further complicating the trading relationship with China.

This account is based on interviews with people briefed on the surveillance, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the findings are drawn from classified intelligence, as well as other officials and industry executives and analysts. American officials already suspected that Ms. Huang was helping China evade constraints on its ability to gain access to advanced A.I. chips. But the revelation that she was feeding information directly to Beijing raised more troubling possibilities, including that Mr. Huang had insights into Mr. Trump’s thinking on an issue of vital importance to both nations, one likely to come up when the president visits China next month. And it left questions about whether she could be gleaning information about Nvidia, which as much as any company accounts for the lead the United States has maintained in developing cutting-edge A.I. models. The surveillance of Ms. Huang continues, they said, and companies that have been affiliated with her continued this year to purchase Nvidia chips.
Nvidia said in a statement: “Jensen’s interactions with Ms. Huang are not unusual or unexpected. Meetings with customers are part of a CEO’s job; Jensen talks with thousands of customer executives every year.” Nvidia is “confident that if the U.S. government believes that any person is a threat to American industry, it would let us know.” Customers like Megaspeed, the company that employed Ms. Huang, “receive ordinary business information — not sensitive Nvidia trade secrets — and zero information relevant to national security,” the company added.
In a statement to The New York Times, Megaspeed said that its “current leadership” takes the matter “extremely seriously and is committed to getting to the facts behind these allegations.” It added that “outside counsel has been retained to conduct a thorough internal investigation and has notified the U.S. government that we are fully committed to cooperating.”

Of course he is

By Valgrus Thunderaxe • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread
If you’re China why wouldn’t you spy on him? If you’re Chinese intelligence, you’d be derelict in your duties.

Re:Of course he is

By smooth wombat • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
What’s with the black leather jacket he always wears? Does he think he’s the Fonz? Or a Ramone?

Essentially, his wife and daughter made the choice:

Huang staple black jackets have also been talked about in the previous years. In most of the interviews, just like this one, he has seen talking about these jackets and associate them to his wife. He says that these jackets are often bought buy his wife, Lori Huang.

Last year, in an interview with the NYT, he confirmed that he has been dressing up the same for almost 20 years, and “all thanks to my wife and daughter.”

For a bit more on the subject:

The tale resurfaced in a recent clip from an interview with Money Focus, where the 62-year-old CEO explained the jacket’s true origin. “This is what my wife bought for me, and this is what I’m wearing,” Huang said with a grin, patting the familiar leather on his shoulders. It was never intended as a branding strategy. It was a solution to a lifelong problem: he hates shopping and finds most clothes uncomfortable. “I do zero percent of my own shopping,” he joked. His wife, Lori Mills Huang, stepped in long ago and has chosen his wardrobe ever since. She has known him since he was seventeen, after all.

Alphabet Heads For a $500 Billion Drop In Market Value

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Yesterday, Google reported its Q3 results that showed searches made through its AI Mode generate less revenue than traditional search, even as overall search revenue grew 12% year over year to $63.25 billion. The news sent Alphabet shares plunging, with Bespoke Investment Group reporting that the stock is on track for its steepest post-earnings decline since the company went public in 2004. Yahoo Finance reports:
At its low, Alphabet had lost $524 billion in stock market value, the second-biggest one-day loss ever for a US-listed company. Only Nvidia has lost more, about $593 billion on Jan. 27, 2025, the day China’s DeepSeek rattled AI investors. Alphabet would need to close at about $274.75, down roughly 15%, to take Nvidia’s record, by Yahoo Finance calculations. It has already blown past the $400 billion SpaceX lost on June 22, the previous No. 2.

In dollars, it’s Alphabet’s worst day by far. Its previous worst was about $275 billion on July 23. It’s also on track for the stock’s steepest drop after an earnings report since the company went public, according to Bespoke Investment Group. The previous low was a slide of nearly 10% in July 2008.

[…] US-listed stocks have shed $200 billion or more in a single session 18 times this year through Wednesday. That’s up from 13 in all of 2025 and none before 2022, according to Yahoo Finance calculations from Bloomberg data. Alphabet alone has lost about $1.4 trillion since its record in May.

Maybe

By Luthair • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread
Maybe we can finally be rid of Sundar Pichai and end his reign of enshitification at Google. Usually though this end in layoffs for workers and bonuses for executives.

It’s not a recession

By Local ID10T • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

This is just the leading edge of a bubble popping. Nothing to see here, move along.

What? The recession has been here all along, but was being masked by the bubble-powered gains in the stock market? oh dear.

Search

By sit1963nz • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread
Search has become so bad its hardly worth using.
I DONT want your AI BS search
I want your search to go back to how it was 10 years ago where it was fast, accurate, helpful. Not this enshitified thing you have now.

Doc, it hurts when I do this

By Sloppy • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

searches made through its AI Mode generate less revenue than traditional search

Have you thought about disabling AI Mode and returning customers to traditional search? It’ll not only make you more money, but result in happier users too. Everyone-except-Nvidia wins.

Re:Maybe

By OrangeTide • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

The sort of people who could turn Google into a profitable innovation powerhouse no longer work at Google. Google lives and dies on how tightly they can hold onto their existing advertising empire. That’s all they’ve got now and it is all they will ever be.

Canada to Join EU Network of Supercomputers

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Canada is joining the European Union’s supercomputing network to give Canadian companies, startups, and researchers access to European computing resources for AI development. The partnership aims to strengthen AI cooperation and reduce dependence on US technology. Politico reports:
The EU’s supercomputing network is run by the EuroHPC Joint Undertaking, an EU public-private vehicle with an 8.2 billion-euro budget. The network consists of 14 supercomputers (some ranked in the global top 10), 19 AI-focused AI factories and 10 quantum computers. The vehicle will also run seven massive AI data center hubs, known as AI gigafactories, set to be built next year with a total investment cost of 30 billion euros.

Experts praised a possible EU-Canadian compute power team-up, but warned it’s only the start. “Compute cooperation is one of the most obvious short-term ‘middle power’ cooperation plays in AI,” said Anton Leicht, technology and international affairs fellow at Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. But he added that for now “it doesn’t put a dent into the actual dependence” on the U.S. “As long as the U.S. builds gigawatt-scale clusters, no amount of cooperation that doesn’t result in massive buildouts will help,” he said.

Canada’s engagement in the EU’s supercomputer network builds further on Canada’s previous partial involvement in the EU’s flagship research and development program, Horizon Europe. Horizon Europe partially funds EuroHPC. To date, 38 countries have participated in the EU’s supercomputing network: 27 EU member countries plus non-EU countries including Norway, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, Israel and Turkey.

The US is an unreliable boyfriend

By atrimtab • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

Go Canada! Diversify as many of your dependencies on the US as you can!!!

There is a new book about this Unreliable Boyfriend: An Insider’s View of Dealing with a Chaotic Superpower, Plutocrats, and Other Complicated People

Trump’s America First really means America ALONE with $40 Trillion in government debt. In Trump’s unaffordable economy of useless foreign wars with the inflation caused by Trump’s economic policies. And just wait until the Medicaid cuts come into force AFTER the midterms… It’s time to neuter Trump.

I wonder if this consortium will be using Mistral.ai?

Need I say it?

By 93 Escort Wagon • • Score: 3 • Thread

Winning! I’m tired of all the winning!

Re:The US is an unreliable boyfriend

By sit1963nz • • Score: 4, Informative • Thread
They ARE saying it by removing dependancy on the USA, broadening trade agreements with other countries.

History will be VERY unkind (honest) about Trump and his Family and Friends…“Trump: The Man who killed the USA”

Trump has pulled various kill switches , everyone “knew” they were there, using them just proved the USA was willing to do that, even to allies.

Re:The US is an unreliable boyfriend

By ZombieCatInABox • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread

Unreliable boyfriend ?

The US is a fucking wife beater.

DoorDash Strikes $17 Billion Deal For US Rival Instacart

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
DoorDash has agreed to acquire Instacart for about $17 billion as it expands beyond restaurant delivery and deeper into the U.S. grocery market. The deal, expected to close in late 2027 or the first half of 2028, could face regulatory scrutiny over further consolidation in the delivery industry. Reuters reports:
DoorDash has offered Instacart shareholders $65 per share held, representing a premium of about 26% to the stock’s closing price on October 22 before reports of deal talks first emerged. The consideration will be at least 75% cash, with Instacart shareholders able to elect cash, DoorDash stock or a combination of the two, the companies said.

[…] The transaction is expected to close at the end of 2027 or the first half of 2028. The deal could face scrutiny over its impact on competition, with New York City’s Department of Consumer and Worker Protection (DCWP) saying on Wednesday that a potential merger continued a “troubling trend” of corporate consolidation. DoorDash, however, pledged on Thursday that local grocers could continue to work with any delivery platform they choose.

Reddit Is Getting a ‘For You’ Feed

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Reddit is overhauling its homepage with separate “For You” and “Following” feeds, with the former combining posts from subscribed communities and algorithmic recommendations based on users’ interests and activity. The Verge reports:
It’s a big shift for the platform, but not an entirely surprising one, as Reddit hasn’t been shy about wanting to switch up the homepage. Earlier this year, the company announced it would be deprecating r/all, which surfaced posts that were popular across the platform, as part of its “ongoing efforts to simplify Reddit and improve Home feed personalization.”
“This new feed experience is a first step in helping drive discovery that leads to something novel and relevant — an idea, a connection, a unique perspective, or even a new interest,” Reddit says. “A more human internet is not just something you sit back and watch, it is something you find value in and want to participate in.”

It continues

By phantomfive • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
The enshittification continues. Ruin things in the name of profit.

The uncomfortable truth is that a significant portion of the population prefers the enshittified feed, otherwise it wouldn’t be profitable.

Re:It continues

By Frederic54 • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread
True, I will continue to browse https://old.reddit.com/r/all/ until it does not work anymore, then bye bye reddit.

Screw Reddit

By RamenJunkie • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread
Man it’s gotten so terrible in less than a year. I swear they rolled out some AI moderation at the start because I ended up banned after 15+ years and it’s all the same ahitpost I always did. But hey, I had other accounts, but then dropping /r/all, probably because stories about how trash the US administration is were all over that feed. They are apparently dumping RSS feeds too, and block new and returning users from using old.reddit. Now this stupid For You nonsense because they are desperate to get people using communities besides the 5-6 actually useful small communities people still come for.

Ugh, no.

By ebunga • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

The whole point of reddit is that it’s Not That. If people wanted a facebook shovel feed they would be on facebook.

‘Please Let the Internet Die’

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Slashdot reader fjo3 shares an article from Wired:
The internet must be put out of its misery. Any rational observer can admit that the current iteration of the web — and the social fabric woven there — is not what they signed up for. Symptoms of advanced cultural decay can no longer be ignored. This thing is eating itself. Giants including Meta and Google have been forced to settle massive consumer lawsuits brought over privacy violations and mental health harms allegedly caused by the addictive mechanisms of their platforms. Schools are banning smartphones as multiple countries institute social media restrictions for under-16s. Parents are in a panic about their kids aspiring to careers as social media celebrities, losing themselves in a vast ecosystem of online casinos, or joining extremist movements. Generative AI, briefly considered an amusing novelty, is now a turbocharged slop engine for the web, filling feeds and comment sections with useless, grotesque content. As humans scroll past headlines about AI taking their jobs, confusing fantasy for reality, and contributing to cognitive decline, any consumer appeal the technology might have is turning to anguish. The data centers that power it have become increasingly unpopular, and politically radioactive.

To be online, many now admit, is to be endlessly manipulated and exploited. In December, Oxford University Press declared rage bait to be the word of the year, noting that use of the term had tripled over the previous 12 months. The lexical spike represented a heightened awareness that monetized social accounts churn out bad-faith takes and extremist content, automating this abusive behavior with generative AI, simply to profit off hostile engagement. Billionaire oligarchs have opened the floodgates to such inauthentic activity, conspiracy-mongering, and hate speech by rolling back moderation. In short, when you hang around online in 2026, you see little worth saving. Perhaps a decade ago, you felt that the glimmers of community and joy, of artistic and intellectual exchange, were enough to balance out the toxic junk. No longer.

Boo hoo

By RogueWarrior65 • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Oh, boo hoo! The government can’t control what people people see, read, or think. Psst… that’s called freedom, son. You should try it some time.

Re:What is “the internet”

By dfghjk • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

I don’t know who you think “we” is, but I certainly understand that, the problem is that the OP doesn’t. “The internet” here means what a layperson thinks, it is the content not the nuts and bolts. The internet is what you interact with, not the phone line you use to do so. No one advocates that data services should die.

“We just want web 1.0 back”
No, we don’t. Ignorance is what has created the mess, it will not be the solution to it. Your opinion is based on your assumed personal superiority, an assumption at odds with your simplistic view.

There is no accountability on the internet, by design. Until that changes, “the internet” will be corrupt and “we”, as in you, continue to think that’s the right answer. Web 1.0 had no accountability, that was the part preserved to enable the corruption we face.

I have been saying these things since the 90’s, for at least 30 years. Greed and corruption was apparent then, all that has changed is how obvious the social damage is. Back then, the enthusiasm was directed to how to exploit ad revenue devices to take money while providing no product or service, literally pure greed. That was what drove the internet then and drives the internet now, a return to “Web 1.0” does nothing to fix that even if it makes you feel better about yourself.

It should also be understood that it’s not just “the internet”. The computer revolution was driven by opportunities to improve productivity, people was interested because they cared what they could do. Computers and applications were driven by improved capability and that’s what computer sciences focused on. That is not true today, instead computing is oriented around exploitation and corporate profit and that is now what computer sciences focus on. That’s why modern software development sucks, it’s entirely greed-driven. AI is the same, research used to focus on capability, now it’s money grab.

Shaking fist at clouds?

By King_TJ • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

I’m old enough to remember the computer bulletin board system (BBS) days fondly. I ran my own BBS for over a decade, in one form or another. At the end, I moved it to kind of a hybrid setup where I had 4 dial-in phone numbers for modems, but also a 128K ISDN circuit to the Internet. Most callers used it as a way to access some Internet resources while others started connecting to the BBS itself via the Internet.

Ultimately, BBS sysops (the jargon for system operators) realized we were at the end of an era. The Internet simply made the hobby of BBSing obsolete. Why limit oneself to using a specific bulletin board system and whatever limited options it has on its menus, when a raw Internet connection allowed hopping all over the world to content of all types — even accessing multiple screens of it simultaneously?

Even back then though? I think many of us mourned the lack of personal connection that caused. On a BBS you used regularly, you had typically 100-500 or so somewhat regular users to interact with. Most were in your same geographic location. It wasn’t uncommon to organize gatherings so people could meet the real humans behind the screen names/handles.Message topics were more relevant to where you lived. People could actually request 1 on one chats with the sysops, and most people got to know them pretty well.

The Internet doesn’t “need to die”, but maybe more people should make the effort to seek out and use web sites offering quality content, vs a habit of spending most of their time on big-name social media sites? I know for me, a good example for this is cars. I’ve always been kind of an auto enthusiast, and I used to always seek out a web message forum for any vehicle I purchased, and immediately join as as new member there. These days, I see all these enthusiast type groups popping up on Facebook — but none of them offer the depth of information the dedicated web forums have. You just wind up with thousands of people in the Facebook group asking the same questions and wanting to show off photos of whatever they did cosmetically to their ride. The message forums always seem to have a few regulars who REALLY know the car inside and out. I’m talking master mechanics who have taken the whole vehicle apart and put it back together again, in their own garage. And they post a LOT of “how to” type message threads and more.

Re: Blame the correct thing

By RazorSharp • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

Your comment is 100 years out of date. It is no different than when you morons deny climate science with a straight face. We are living it now and you are telling us not to trust our lying eyes.

Re:Waaaah! More censorship! Waaaaaaaaaa!

By zeeky boogy doog • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
The cure for speech you don’t like is your own speech against it,

This works in normal life:
A> yay hitler
B, C, D> fuck you nazi piece of shit
onlookers E-Z> wow nobody likes A, I shouldn’t be a nazi

But it explicitly does not work when the Social Cancer algorithm is in control:
A> yay hitler
B, C, D> fuck you nazi piece of shit
Social Cancer algorithm: “Wow, A really got a lot of engagement on that post, let’s push it to more people.”
random people E-Z: “huh, this nazi guy seems to get a lot of attention…

Just like bad money pushes out good and lies spread faster than the truth, negative garbage content pushes out good because we’ve introduced a curator who is a sociopath that was never taught the difference between good and bad attention. To give a concrete example: There is an entire industrial scale operation that revolves around posting fucktarded “hack” videos to youtube because it doesn’t matter if you’re posting “this is a bullshit hack because [obvious things]", you still clicked on it and engaged with it and that’s all the Social Cancer algorithm cares about.

Forget censorship, I just want to go back to the world where shouting bad shit down means it’s shouted down, not actively promoted.

Google Struggling to Make AI Mode Searches Pay

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Alphabet shares fell nearly 10% after Google disclosed that searches through its AI Mode generate less revenue than traditional search, even as overall search revenue grew 12% year over year to $63.25 billion. The Register reports:
Alphabet on Wednesday reported its Q3 results, which included news that its year-over-year search query growth rate is the highest it’s been in the last five years. Some of that growth comes from users adopting “AI Mode” — Google’s latest LLM-powered search system. Google’s revenue from search rose 12 percent year-over-year to $63.25 billion, a little lower than the 14.5 percent growth the company reported in last year’s Q3.

During Alphabet’s earnings call, chief business officer Philipp Schindler said the slowdown was caused by “lower monetization we were seeing in AI Mode.” That’s a worry given that Google is spending enormous sums on infrastructure. $51.4 billion went out the door in Q3, around two thirds of it going towards servers and networking equipment. The rest funded datacenter builds. That spending appears to have impacted profitability, as Alphabet reported $26.17 billion net income for the quarter. Last year’s Q3, during which Google revenue was $102.35 billion, produced $35 billion net income.

Schindler argued that AI search will pay off. “On AI Mode, many of these queries are upper funnel queries, allowing us to capture new, high-value commercial intent,” he told investors. “In addition, the majority of AI Mode queries are incremental, creating more monetization opportunities over time.” Google tried to seize one of those opportunities today, by turning on ads alongside AI Mode searches around the world, after first testing them in the US only. But for now, AI Mode searches aren’t as lucrative as Google’s existing search business, which brought in just under half of Alphabet’s $125.8 billion quarterly revenue.

Re:Is any company managing to make AI anything pay

By Smidge204 • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Are you sure? There’s so much money tied up in circular loans and IOUs based on potential profits that I’m not sure they are.

For example: NVidia invests billions into OpenAI and Anthropic, who then use that money to buy NVidia products. Has NVidia actually made any money, or does the “demand” for the product simply drive up the speculative stock price?

=Smidge=

Amusingly

By Zak3056 • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

If you ask Gemini why Google’s search results have gotten so bad, it will give you an honest answer and suggest you use DuckDuckGo instead. Not exactly sure how you monetize “our service is telling our customers to go to our competitors instead” unless you’re Macy’s and you’re in a Christmas movie.

Re: Is any company managing to make AI anything pa

By DarkOx • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

I agree

The winners here are going to be people with actual hardware IP (Nvidia, Apple, others), people with actual hardware fabs, and likely Google and Meta. I predict despite the current crazy valuations the Magnificent-7 eventually end up acquiring the leading AI labs.

The real costs are in building models, not hosting them comparatively speaking and that picture only improves as the energy infrastructure and hardware markets gradually align to the volume demands. The labs are already just reselling the hyperscallers computer, there is no reason those guys are not going to take ‘good enough’ models and beat them on price.

Having the ‘best’ models is an asset someone with existing SaaS, Marketing, etc business on the hand can leverage and by extension justify the expense. That is why I see OpenAI and Anthropic eventually becoming acquisition targets once the gold-rush investors capitulate on their valuations.

The option is for them to get directly into the datacenter biz (not contracting for them and agreeing consumption commitments but actually building them and owning the dirt all they way up to the roof top chillers. Anthropic seems to be trying to make that play but I still don’t know where the revenue will really come from…

Re:Search engine company can’t do search

By Arrogant-Bastard • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
"“fascist” being thrown around trivializes the millions of people that have died from fascism or dictatorships. From Mussolini, Stalin, Hitler and others.”

As someone who’s read Hannah Arendt (among many others) I’m well-acquainted with the concept of fascism and the abhorrent consequences of those who espouse it.

Trump is a fascist, and the killing has already begun. See, for example: Update on Lives Lost from USAID Cuts which estimates 500,000 to 700,000 deaths per year from that single decision alone. (Of course almost all of these will be black and brown people, so Trump would prefer that we not count their lives at all.) But as awful as this already is, and it will get worse, it’s only part of the killing. His insane health secretary is pushing nonsense, which is why measles is back (and it won’t be the only returning disease). His drunk secretary of defense orchestrated the bombing of a girl’s school. His gestapo (ICE) is disappearing and killing people on a constant basis. And yet all of these combined may only end up be a fraction of the total deaths due to his wholesale destruction of the environment and his embrace of fossil fuels at a time when we desperately need to be rid of them.

It is entirely possible that by the time he’s done that Trump will kill more people than Mussolini, Stalin, and Hitler combined. First, because there are more people to kill; second, because the world situation is more fragile than it was in their time; and third, because modern technology enables killing on a mass scale that simply wasn’t possible when those monsters were alive.

So I stand by the word “fascist”; that’s exactly what he is. The only remaining question is how high the body count will go before he’s stopped.

Take that, stupid golden goose!

By pla • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
The primary reason companies advertise with Google is to drive search results to their site.

If AI summaries become good enough that nobody needs to click the links anymore - What are advertisers paying for? “Brand recognition” only takes things so far, at some point they need real customers to drop in and throw money at them or they won’t have anything to advertise.

Ink Droplets In Motion Snag Top Prize In Nikon Small World Contest

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
A 25-year-old German photographer won the 2026 Nikon Small World competition with a microscopic image freezing ink droplets in midair as an inkjet printer deposits them onto paper. Ars Technica reports that Ole Bielfeldt “beat out 1,802 other entries hailing from 69 different countries.” From the report:
Bielfeldt became interested in photomicrography during the COVID-19 lockdown after discovering an old microscope in his parents’ attic. He figured out how to build an adaptor out of a tube and some wood to connect the microscope to his father’s camera and taught himself the art through trial and error, building custom tools as needed. He documents how he captures transformative images of everyday objects with behind-the-scenes videos posted to macrofying, his photography and videography brand.

It was Bielfeldt’s curiosity about the inner workings of inkjet printers that inspired his winning entry, but capturing the action of ink drops being deposited on paper was a challenge, given that the process happens so quickly. The droplets, for instance, moved faster than the camera’s shutter speed. Bielfeldt’s solution was to deconstruct the printer so that the paper moved under a stationary (rather than moving) printhead, and then take the image in a dark room, using a flash to serve as the shutter, thereby freezing the ink drops mid-air. There was no need for pricey equipment. Bielfeldt does not use AI in his images, preferring to rely on traditional techniques.
“Ole Bielfeldt’s winning image embodies what makes Nikon Small World so powerful: the intersection of microscope imaging, ingenuity, and artistry,” said Eric Flem, a spokesperson for Nikon Instruments. “By using a microscope objective in a different way, he transformed a familiar object into something altogether new and previously unseen. It is a reminder that the microscope is not only a scientific tool but also a creative one, capable of expanding how we see and imagine the world around us.”
The full list of winners can be found here.

Wow

By drnb • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread
Wow. a news for nerds story that is actually pretty damn cool. Even a summary that is interesting.

Looks like a cool background for intro credits

By drnb • • Score: 3 • Thread
I don’t know why, but it looks like a cool background for a movie or series into credits.

Bank of America Kindly Asks That You Don’t Share Your Password With Your AI Assistant

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Longtime Slashdot reader schwit1 shares a report from TechCrunch:
In an email blast to customers titled “Protecting your finances in the Al World,” Bank of America urged customers to never share their username and password with another person or an outside service, "including an Al-enabled tool or agent that offers to act on your behalf.” […] A spokesperson for Bank of America confirmed the authenticity of the bank’s email that was posted to social media. But heed the bank’s warning, for if things go wrong, it’s on you. Account agreements at most banks hold customers responsible for anyone they give their log-in to. “If you do share your credentials,” its email reads, “keep in mind that you’re responsible for activity resulting from that access.”

A fool and their money are soon parted

By jhoegl • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
Happens way more than people think.

How abysmally stupid do you have to be …

By gweihir • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

… to even only seriously consider doing that? These people are operating on the level of totally deranged cultists.

Finally …

By drnb • • Score: 3, Funny • Thread

Bank of America Kindly Asks That You Don’t Share Your Password With Your AI Assistant

Finally, good advice from too-big-to-fail banks. ;-)

Re:How abysmally stupid do you have to be …

By drinkypoo • • Score: 4 • Thread

Apparently lots of people. That is really stupid. It’s also against the T&C but in fairness nobody reads those because they are biblically long, which ought to be illegal itself.

Re:How abysmally stupid do you have to be …

By drnb • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread

They have been shutting down physical branches for the last 20 year, so online banking is basically mandatory.

Yes, but encouraging people to use their day-to-day computer or phone is a bad idea. For online banking one should have a dedicated computer or phone that is used for nothing else. Perhaps a dirt cheap chromebook, or an old PC or phone that has had a factory reset and still gets updates.

Anthropic Engineer Declares the Coding Interview Dead

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
An Anthropic engineering manager says he has stopped using traditional coding interviews because AI can now outperform candidates on the kinds of programming challenges they typically contain. “There’s no more point in giving you a little React challenge than there is in quizzing people about assembly; Claude is now better at both,” said Felix Rieseberg in a blog post. “Our most impactful builders are successful regardless of how good they are at these tests.” The Register reports:
“I don’t think the coding interview is going to come back,” said Rieseberg. “It’s easy to get sentimental given how many copies of ‘Algorithms and Data Structures’ were bought in hopes of unlocking good jobs and a better future — or how the death of the coding interview is another milestone in software engineering reaching a new level of abstraction.”

At the same time, he’s not certain what will replace it. “I’m probably not the only manager trying to figure out how to interview for people who build well with AI,” Rieseberg wrote. “I haven’t quite gotten there yet — but I’m scanning resumes and portfolios for little prototypes that exhibit taste, empathy, and principled thinking. If you have figured out something better, I’d love to hear how.”
In a response posted to social media, Jaana Dogan, principal engineer at Google, said: “I’m not doing a ton of coding interviews nowadays but I’d be interested to interview how people use coding agents,” she wrote. “That itself gives me more signals about candidates’ coding skills.”
“We are not seeing tech companies abandon skills assessments widely across the industry — at least not yet,” added Nicole Bachaud, labor economist at ZipRecruiter. “In fact, based on our October 2026 Employer Survey of 1,500 employers, we see the tech industry (Information sector specifically) is actually the most likely to test for skills, with 62.5 percent of employers requiring formal skill tests on initial applications.”

“The change at Anthropic might be reflecting a shift away from technical skills towards more human, soft skills,” said Bachaud. “As AI becomes fully capable of writing code, tech employers may be pivoting away from rote technical testing and heavily toward human-centric soft skills.” She argues that while AI may be able to code well, it can’t replace critical thinking. “A staggering 61.5 percent of Information employers now report that ‘critical thinking’ is a primary skill lacking in today’s candidate pool,” she said.

Re:From one dev manager to another

By Brain-Fu • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

I have worked with junior level devs who just take a dev task’s requirements, hand it straight to AI, put that through basic testing (only the main intended cases) and then offer that up as a finished solution. The solution was, of course, full of holes, some of them quite serious, just not obvious. The holes were in the edge cases and how it handles and recovers from errors. These were exactly the kinds of mistakes I would expect a junior level developer to make (in at least one case I am thinking of, the task shouldn’t have even been handed to someone so inexperienced, but the people making that decision didn’t really know how advanced the task was and anyway the dev wanted to get real experience).

So, our process worked because we had senior level human code review, which caught these. But the real risk here is that without such experienced senior level people to do that review this would have seemed like a “slam dunk” where AI saved a whole lot of time and eliminated the need for expensive veterans on the team (only to fail catastrophically in production as soon as something hiccupped). This is what I am most concerned about. Companies will fall for this. Especially new companies where leadership is just as inexperienced at running a tech business as the cheap vibe coders they hire.

So if we are hiring people who will be using AI to do most of the coding work, I think we need to test the thoroughness of their thinking, their ability to detect unspoken problematic edge cases and know to focus on them when reviewing the AIs output, and the ability to recognize dangerous vagueness in requirements and ask for clarity. Also, the ability to mentally translate between “business speak” and “tech speak” is extremely valuable.

Though I still don’t feel right about skipping a proof of coding skills. I just don’t think we are yet at the point where it is safe for someone who can’t code to be relying on AI to get it right. The aforementioned senior developers doing the code review are all people who have been coding by hand for years, and in order for such people to continue being available to do code reviews in the future, we need to make sure we hire people who can do this.

Not surprising to me

By jenningsthecat • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

“A staggering 61.5 percent of Information employers now report that ‘critical thinking’ is a primary skill lacking in today’s candidate pool,”

I’m an old fart so I may be totally out to lunch on this one, but I get the impression that most of today’s schools really don’t teach students to think, question, analyze, and synthesize. I think this applies across all subjects, not just in technical ones.

Part of me thinks that the ones who DO know how to think and analyze are tilting the table against subsequent generations by under-funding education, healthcare, and nutrition. If you look at today’s parasite class - many of whom are in the tech field - you see that their political attacks on taxpayers getting any of the benefit from the money they’ve paid are increasing. The broligarchs want it all for themselves, and I think they see AI as a stepping stone toward making the bulk of humans now living on Earth expendable. I think that it’s in their plans to expend a whole lot of us.

And replace them with what?

By evslin • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

If you don’t know what to replace a coding interview with, then you aren’t a “thought leader” as they like to call themselves on LinkedIn - you’re just trying to make the rest of the industry dogfood your product for you while your company loses amounts of money equivalent to the GDP of small countries every year.

In the meantime, I still need to know if an applicant knows how to code, because if they get an LLM to write something for them and it’s shit, I’m not yelling at their LLM, I’m yelling at them. So, the coding interview stays.

Re:From one dev manager to another

By tragedy • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Your process for interviewing should not change. You need engineers that can think well to judge the output of an LLM well.

Quite right. The logic the manager from the article is presenting is incomprehensible. They’re arguing what? That you don’t need coding problems in interviews because an AI can do them instead. Classically, they have been stock problems that are pretty much just mild variations of standard stuff from textbooks. So if you don’t need to bother with them now because AI can do them, then you never should have needed to bother with them because the problems had already been done before, thousands of times, and written down. What does this guy think, that the coding problems in interviews are vital new developments in computer science or something? Now, some companies do actually present those as problems just to see how the interviewee approaches them, and there are also some stories about unethical companies that have used long-form interviews as a way to get programming piecework done for free by suckers, but that’s not what’s being discussed here. The point is that we’re talking about a basic way to make sure that interviewees actually understand the concepts themselves, not asking for the interviewee to demonstrate that they can accomplish some amazing task that no-one else on Earth could perform.

Re:Not surprising to me

By gweihir • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

It has always been like that. In fact, most of those claiming they want to hire critical thinkers actually are not critical thinkers themselves and do not want to hire any. Critical thinkers have always been rare, they are inconvenient, they tell you that you are doing things wrong. There are very few people that want to hire such people and these are critical thinkers themselves. But these people tend to get not promoted and eventually removed from an organization and hence the circle of mental incapability continues.

Massive Leak Exposes 41,000 Homeland Security Workers

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
A massive leak has exposed records tied to more than 41,000 DHS employees and contractors, including roughly 10,000 ICE personnel. The data, reportedly taken from DHS’s Okta login system, reveals phone numbers, email and office addresses, reporting relationships, and permission groups associated with undercover operations, wiretapping and surveillance tools. Wired reports:
In all, the leak provides a map of how DHS is organized and how it operates. The records, which span DHS itself as well as seven component agencies, including Immigration and Customs Enforcement and US Customs and Border Protection, were last updated on August 19, 2026.

The transparency nonprofit Distributed Denial of Secrets and cybersecurity researcher and journalist maia arson crimew previewed the data to WIRED, which they say they obtained from a group calling itself the Department of Peace. DDoSecrets published the archive, which it calls “Icepick,” on Wednesday. In a press release, DDoSecrets says the data is from DHS’s Okta login system. In a note with the files, the hackers wrote, “They have our information, so it’s only fair that we have theirs.” An Okta spokesperson tells WIRED that it is unaware of any breach of its systems. “We are aware of this report. Okta is secure, and we have no evidence our data or systems were compromised,” the spokesperson says.

Re:Leftists in Prison

By Anonymous Coward • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

aw honey

doesn’t it get old inventing imaginary enemies?

when the courts say that someone is a ‘sex trafficker’, that’s not ‘leftists’. The court isn’t ‘leftists’. You have enough enemies without inventing new ones. don’t be greedy.

Re:Public domain data is now public domain

By Zero__Kelvin • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread
I agree that ICE Agents should pay for their crimes, but don’t you think you execution for insubordination might be taking it a bit too far? It seems like a couple of decades in prison for their treason should be enough. The prisoners will take it from there.

Re:Public domain data is now public domain

By Arrogant-Bastard • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
“Why though? These aren’t elected officials, they aren’t political positions. Why should their information be any more public than who your employer is (assuming you don’t work for yourself in a small family owned business)?”

Because those of us who work for governments (which I’ve done, twice) are public servants. We are accountable to our supervisors and their supervisors and so on, but that chain of accountability ultimately ends with the citizens of the city/county/state/province/country that pays us. We are required, by basic professional ethics, to always keep their best interests in mind, and — in my view — to put their interests ahead of our own.

In both the cases I mentioned above, not only was my basic personal information available to everyone — name, address, position, etc., — but so was my salary. As it should be: the people paying me have the right to know what they’re paying me, and what they’re paying me for.

Re:Oh No!

By gtall • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

On the other hand, you the future Social Security recipient, will get increasingly taxed because you made the U.S. unwelcoming for immigrants and migrants. What precisely is it that you object to? Them coming here and working their tails off, raising families, paying taxes, etc., essentially acting like good citizens.

But maybe we’re fucking Christian Nation, able to look a poor migrant in the eye and tell them to enjoy the Love of Jesus Christ on their own because they won’t be getting any of it from you.

Re:Oh No!

By Targon • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

MAGA is based on the idea that those from Spanish-speaking countries are unskilled and don’t speak the English language. Now, if those who are unskilled and don’t speak the language are being hired over MAGA, that says pretty clearly that MAGA is made up of unskilled and worthless people who KNOW that with ANY competition for jobs, they won’t get the job.

Seriously, if an immigrant is a better choice, then people really need to look at their own skills before complaining about immigrants taking their job. The only ones who have a valid complaint are when companies will pay immigrants less for the same level of skill and experience, at which point, the COMPANIES should be the ones being demonized, not the people working and looking to get a job.

Amazon Puts a Camera In Its Echo Studio So Alexa Can See

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot
Amazon has added a camera to its Echo Studio speaker, allowing Alexa to visually identify objects, help with tasks and remotely monitor a room. For those concerned about privacy, Amazon is keeping a camera-free version available. The Next Web reports:
The camera speaker ships today for $249.99. Hold up a board game box and Alexa can explain the rules, or show it a box of cereal and it can help you reorder it, according to Amazon. Owners can also check in on the room from the Alexa app while they are away. The Echo Studio without a camera stays on sale at $219.99.

A dedicated button turns off the microphones and any camera, and a visual indicator shows when a camera streams images or video to the cloud, Amazon said. Certain features require Alexa+, which is included with a Prime membership.
Other devices Amazon unveiled today include an Echo Time alarm clock, an Alexa Photo Frame and the Echo Show 16.

Nope!

By LondoMollari • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

AI already knows enough about me without seeing my half nude midnight runs to the fridge.

Ha Ha Ha

By SlashbotAgent • • Score: 4, Informative • Thread

I had an Echo Dot given to me. It sat unopened on my desk for a couple of years. Then I recycled it, still in the original unopened box.

Now they’ve added a camera? Ha ha ha ha.

But seriously; why would anyone buy that thing? I know that many people will. But why?

The dedicated button…

By dskoll • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

A dedicated button turns off the microphones and any camera

Yes. For sure it does. Absolutely. Scout’s honor.

Above average morality

By drnb • • Score: 4, Funny • Thread

I had an Echo Dot given to me. It sat unopened on my desk for a couple of years. Then I recycled it, still in the original unopened box.

That is above average morality there, many people would have regifted. ;-)

Colossus

By PPH • • Score: 3 • Thread

Didn’t Colossus demand that Dr Forbin be placed under video surveillance as well?