Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Xbox Manager: AI Already Being Used In Xbox Game Development - And Throughout the Game Industry
  2. Binance Replenishes 90% of Stolen $6.3B, Pledges They’ll Cover It All, Reopen Sunday
  3. Computer Simulations Suggest Building Blocks of Life Didn’t Arrive on Prehistoric Comets
  4. Recycling ANSI Art: Tracing the Origins of BBS Logon Screens
  5. French Lawmakers Back Per-Gigabyte Internet Traffic Tax
  6. NASA Seeks Proposals for Reboosting the Hubble Space Telescope
  7. Dozens of Unexplained Drones Have Buzzed America’s Nuclear Plants Since 2024
  8. Flock Reinstalled Its Cameras After Another City Canceled Its Contract
  9. Google’s AI Overviews Lowered Reddit’s Traffic. Its Stock Dropped 29%
  10. Two US Senators Raise Privacy Concerns About Meta’s ‘Pervert Glasses’
  11. Supersonic Airliner In Doubt As Company Shifts to Powering AI Data Centers
  12. Google’s First Data Center Satellite Is Online and Writing Poetry
  13. Cisco Gives Engineer Unlimited AI Tokens To Rewrite Legacy Code
  14. Apple Is Entering Its Slop Era
  15. Meta Settles Another Social Media Addiction Case Just Before Trial

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Xbox Manager: AI Already Being Used In Xbox Game Development - And Throughout the Game Industry

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Should generative AI be used for videogame development? Brandon Stirrup, a strategy manager at Xbox, claims Xbox is already using AI, reports Engadget. And he also says that those who say they aren’t are merely “pretending.”
Stirrup deactivated his social media account shortly after (though his posts have been archived elsewhere), igniting conversations about what role generative AI actually has or should have in game development. In some ways, it would be unsurprising to learn that Xbox is using AI to the extent that Stirrup implies. Xbox recently announced the formation of Xbox Labs at least in part as a response to a rising trend of AI-coded game ports; the announcement heavily implied that the new team would use AI as well but didn’t say it outright. Xbox owner Microsoft is also a major player in AI development… Developers including Capcom, Square Enix, Sega, Nexon and Activision have all either used AI in their games or pledged to do so. Fortnite developer Epic Games has been particularly up-front about its AI use, and CEO Tim Sweeney has aggressively promoted it on social media…

On the other hand, there are large pockets of the game industry vocally opposed to generative AI. Notably, these tend to be smaller, independent studios without shareholders to impress by touting the cost-savings of AI. These studios include Tunic publisher Finji, Stardew Valley developer ConcernedApe and Clickolding developer Strange Scaffold, among many more. Due to the sheer number and variety of game studios, it’s impossible to say just how much of the industry actually uses AI at this point, but claims that “everyone” is using it are clearly false.

There’s a similar divide among players about whether generative AI should be embraced or avoided at all costs. While some simply accept AI as part of games going forward, others have pledged to avoid games that use the technology outright due to its environmental costs, labor issues or pure aesthetic preference. That’s led to the popularity of tools like a browser extension that makes Steam’s AI disclosures more visible and grassroots efforts by developers to implement labels certifying their games as AI-free… Many players and developers alike justify the use of AI in generating code, even if they’re opposed to it in other areas.
“Gaming is the only industry slow-walking the transition,” Xbox’s Stirrup allegedly said, “because users have negative sentiment. Everyone else accepts reality.”

“Gaming is the only industry pretending to not use AI.”

Binance Replenishes 90% of Stolen $6.3B, Pledges They’ll Cover It All, Reopen Sunday

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
“We’ve now replenished 90% of the stolen assets, and we’re committed to covering the remaining 10%,” Binance co-CEO Richard Teng posted on X, adding that “Our users will not bear the financial impact of this incident.”

“Binance said it was able to replace the funds taken in the record hack by using company money to buy new tokens,” reports NBC News:
The remaining 10% consists of tokens that are less liquid, meaning they may take longer to buy, it said in a statement posted on X… Binance said it has set aside around $6.34 billion of company funds internally to cover the losses. The money spent re-buying tokens came from using part of its $1 billion Secure Asset Fund for Users, a bitcoin reserve it holds to protect customers in the event of security breaches, as well as some of its Futures Insurance Fund, and the company’s own corporate treasury, it said on X.
NBC News reports that the FBI blames the breach on a North Korea-sponsored group known as TraderTraitor:
Members of [TraderTraitor] were observed by law enforcement converting stolen assets into the cryptocurrency ethereum, the FBI said in a statement, adding that it expects “further laundering” of the assets through the use of related technology… After the hack, the exchange stopped allowing customers to withdraw their funds, but it said Saturday it was still on track to reopen withdrawals Sunday.
CNBC reports:
The world’s largest crypto exchange initially said the hack may involve “a compromised DevOps engineer’s laptop, which allowed an attacker to gain access to a service container and submit unauthorized withdrawal transactions.” However, Co-CEO Richard Teng later said the attack involved a more complex process rather than the misuse of a single engineer’s permissions.
The New York Times describes what happened when Binance first spotted “a multibillion-dollar deluge of digital coins” pouring out of its accounts:
As the news spread, Binance’s top executives put together an informal war room on Wea, the company’s internal messaging system, with about 100 participants, including specialized cryptocurrency tracers and security personnel. They eventually transitioned to a mass conference call, with 100 boxes on the screen, where employees took turns muting and then unmuting, communicating in a mixture of English and Chinese. Among them was He Yi, Binance’s co-chief executive, who is seven months pregnant, and worked through the night from her base in Abu Dhabi, taking a call at 3 a.m. local time....

Much of the drama played out in public. Almost all crypto transactions are recorded on the blockchain, a ledger of money movements that anyone can look up. That meant crypto analysts could see funds leaving Binance in real time… North Koreans have targeted crypto companies for years, using the proceeds of those thefts to fund its nuclear program, according to Western officials. The hackers have developed increasingly complex strategies to steal crypto and launder the proceeds, a painstaking endeavor that can take months to complete. In a blog post on Friday, Chainalysis said the attackers had deployed “laundering patterns we have not seen before,” conducting thousands of transactions over a short period, probably with the help of automation.

At the same time, Binance’s colleagues in the industry mobilized to intercept some of the laundered crypto. Certain digital coin issuers can freeze funds, allowing them to halt a money-laundering operation in its tracks. Soon after the hack, Tether and Circle, two major issuers, announced that they had frozen stashes of their own coins that the hackers had seized from Binance, a combined total of more than $2 billion in crypto. Binance is now working to gain access to those funds, the company said. But $2.4 billion in crypto is already “beyond any issuer’s reach,” according to [blockchain intelligence firmm] TRM.
The article also includes President Trump’s reaction when asked Friday about the breach. “I’ve always felt it was a little bit dangerous. But they say they have it pretty much under control. We’ll see.”

Nork, Nork

By Anonymous Coward • • Score: 0 • Thread

Who’s there?
Stole your money!

Re:Nork, Nork

By martin-boundary • • Score: 2 • Thread
What if Binance itself stole the money, and now replenishes 90% of it to get good will while keeping 10% of it, which is what they wanted to steal all along? Conspiracy theorists want to know!

What kind of profit do they make?

By gweihir • • Score: 2 • Thread

This whole thing sound very, very wrong. Like they stole this themselves and that is the reason they even have the money.

Re:What kind of profit do they make?

By ShanghaiBill • • Score: 2 • Thread

What motivation could they have for intentionally making themselves look incompetent?

Re:What kind of profit do they make?

By gweihir • • Score: 2 • Thread

Greed. It has happened in the crapto space time and again. It also has been happening in regular banking, until they got regulated very strictly.

Computer Simulations Suggest Building Blocks of Life Didn’t Arrive on Prehistoric Comets

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
CNN reports:
The popular theory that comets were crucial in kick-starting life on Earth billions of years ago may not hold up, according to new computer simulations that counter decades of scientific thinking. The finding suggests the fragile organic molecules supposedly carried by the icy objects would have been destroyed on impact, upending an established origin of life theory that dates back to at least 1961 [with earlier versions postulated in 1908]…

Early in its history — over 4 billion years ago — Earth may have experienced a period of heavy bombardment from more than 100,000 comets larger than 100 meters (328 feet), according to the new study, published Wednesday in the journal Scientific Reports. Those impacts, however, were mostly too heavy for life-starting molecules to withstand. The team used the latest models of comet formation and evolution to simulate this early planetary period 100,000 times. “Given what we know about surface environments on the early Earth, on average, our simulations found that there were no successful impacts,” said lead study author Richard Anslow, who conducted the research while completing his doctorate at the Institute of Astronomy of the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom… “The typical velocities of these comets when they impact the Earth meant that actually very few, if any, would have been able to deliver intact organic molecules, so comets actually don’t seem to be as useful for prebiotic chemistry as was previously thought,” Anslow said.

More precisely, 54% of the simulations showed no impact at all, while the remaining 46% had at least one and a “tiny minority” returned up to three collisions, Anslow said. “We can’t rule out confidently that there was never a successful impact — there could have been one of these fluke impacts.” However, such flukes had to occur in a “perfect location” that already met several important conditions, including the presence of liquid water and other chemicals needed to support life. That combination makes the overall process unlikely, he added.
The article notes his argument that even if a successful impact occurred, it’s unlikely an important chemical like hydrogen cyanide (HCN) could survive the impact, and would’ve dissolved in an ocean impact. Plus, “many other precursor molecules are also needed, such as compounds that contain phosphorus and sulfur, but these are not routinely found in comets, Anslow said.”
An alternative cosmic source of organic material could have been asteroids, which typically struck Earth more slowly and in greater numbers. Anslow pointed to recent findings on samples from asteroids Bennu and Ryugu, which contain the majority of protein-building amino acids. The recent study also raises another intriguing possibility: While Earth may not have had the ideal conditions to foster HCN from comet impacts, ancient Mars might have been better suited. “Because Mars is much smaller than Earth and further away from the sun, the typical impact velocity of comets is much lower, so while these impacts on Earth were destroying most of the HCN, this wasn’t the case so much for Mars,” Anslow said. This idea could add another dimension to the long-standing question of whether the red planet once supported life.

While the authors closely analyzed how HCN could have survived comet impact, the chemical may have undergone reactions before the icy bodies entered Earth’s atmosphere, said Queenie Chan, an associate professor of Earth sciences at Royal Holloway University of London, who was not involved with the study. This process could have created biologically important compounds, such as those protein building blocks, that are less volatile and more likely to survive.

Re:This is just “God did it”

By martin-boundary • • Score: 3 • Thread

There is no god. But this argument isn’t the Prime Mover Conjecture.

Think of an island in the Pacific. Animals arriving from a nearby continent is a reasonable explanation for the native fauna. It doesn’t mean that all fauna everywhere on every continent must be explained as immigration from the outside.

If the Earth is an island, then this may in fact be what happened locally, provided it can actually be proved. The real issue with Panspermia is that cosmic distances are so vast and timescales so long that chance arrivals of chemical compounds from elsewhere in the galaxy (or even the wider universe) is exceedingly unlikely and shouldn’t be taken seriously with what we currently know.

There’s a variant wherein Life As We Know It may have originated on another planet in our solar system, and later injected into Earth. But that’s a much weaker idea, because it raises the question why Earth, which is clearly in the most hospitable band for Life As We Know It, wouldn’t have evolved its own variant. Instead of waiting for a comet that traveled all the way from a more inhospitable region bringing Life from there.

The good news is that these arguments can be tested scientifically by drilling into the proposed mechanisms directly, no faith needed.

Comet is a disinfectant, duh

By ihadafivedigituid • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread
These scientists never had to scrub a bathroom or they would know this!

Re:Still not complete

By Kisai • • Score: 3, Interesting • Thread

No that’s not what is being said. People please.

The comet theory never held up because that relies on there being another source of life out there. So that is as much as a “god theory” as anything else.

No the most logical theory has always been that the combination of plate techtonics creating mountains, which in turn creates stable wind (all planets with an atmosphere have wind) which eventually leads to lightning, which eventually leads to random particles being created. You’ve all smelled ozone from a lightning strike or a short circuit or a laser printer before right?

The most likely scenario has always been that random chance creates the particles from lightning or geological processes. Once water formed from cooling, it was only a matter of time.

Which means other planets with water and oxygen that also have plate tectonics and wind will have life on them, just there is no gaurantee that life will have evolved past single cell organisms depending on how actively hostile the atmosphere is. There’s a good possibility that “intelligent” life only evolved on Earth from that “thing that killed the dinosaurs” as it cleared the way for a different species to propegate.

Re:Still not complete

By taustin • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

No that’s not what is being said. People please.

Good start.

The comet theory never held up because that relies on there being another source of life out there.

But then you completely miss the point. This isn’t about “life came from space,” this is about “the building blocks of life came from space.” There’s a difference, whether you can understand it or not.

Re:Still not complete

By outsider007 • • Score: 3 • Thread

Doesn’t everything come from space?

Recycling ANSI Art: Tracing the Origins of BBS Logon Screens

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
BBS-era “door” games are preserved by the site Break Into Chat, along with their history. Now the site’s actually traced the origins of several ANSI art screens in the 1980s and “how different people later transformed the original images,” starting from one of the most popular bulletin board systems in St. Louis, Missouri.

Slashdot reader Kirkman14 writes:
"Fire Escape" was curator of the authoritative list of bulletin board systems in St. Louis’s area code and sysop of the area’s most popular board. Like many sysops of that time, Fire Escape enlivened her bulletin board by finding and repurposing older ANSI art. Eventually her BBS had 18 different logon screens in its rotation, many of which featured flames or mushroom clouds or made liberal use of red and yellow.
Break Into Chat follows the trail:
Some, maybe even most, of Fire Escape’s logon screens had actually been adapted from old school “public domain” ANSI art drawn in the late 1980s and early 1990s by folks such as Michael C. Ling, Lora Ruffner (aka “Ebony Eyes”) and Violet Stymacks.... Stymacks was unusually generous with her ANSI art. When she first began drawing, she combed through Fidonet node lists looking for bulletin boards with interesting or inspiring names. When she found one, she would draw an ANSI screen that fit the board’s theme, then send it to the sysop. Eventually, sysops began seeking her out, too. By late 1990, she claimed that 500 bulletin boards were using her screens. Three years later, that total had tripled, according to Boardwatch . I believe it — I have located more than 1,100 of her pieces so far. She was so prolific that it would be surprising if she hadn’t reused or remixed her own work over the years…

[D]id they intend for other people to do so? Or would they have considered such borrowing or adapting as “ripping” or just plain “stealing”? These questions have dogged the BBS, ASCII art, and ANSI art scenes from the beginning. A freelance writer named Patrick Grote grappled with this ethical dilemma in 1990. He had begun to publish archives of ANSI art that he had collected from various public messageboards and networks. But what were people allowed to do with the ANSI screens in these collections? Was it okay to modify them? “Tough call,” Grote said. “I know some people copyright their screens by inserting a little '(C)' on it,” Grote wrote in a README file included in these collections. “Is this ‘true’ copyrighting? I would say yes, but then again, I don’t feel like having any legal action taken against me for using an ANSI screen. In my opinion, I would say leave the ones that say '(C)' alone, but make every effort to contact the artist and ask for permission....”

When I corresponded with Fire Escape this year, she admitted her memory wasn’t what it used to be, but felt certain that she had not asked any artists for permission because she didn’t know who they were or how to reach them. “I figured if anyone had an issue, I’d just remove the screen,” she said.

“But no one ever said anything about it.”

I lived this era

By LondoMollari • • Score: 3 • Thread

Some of the ANSI art was so colorful and creative, I remember wishing I was able to draw it myself but I only had an Apple //e and that meant I had 14.4kbps and no ANSI editor. To make it worse I mostly saw them only in black and white (color at friends’ houses) until that day my new $2400 PowerMac 8100 allowed me to log in with a terminal emulator that supported color.

Having seen that, well, it was a vastly different era overall. How much things have changed in 30 years!

Trial by Fire BBS

By RitchCraft • • Score: 3 • Thread

A buddy and I ran the Trial by Fire BBS in northwest Ohio until late 1995. We had lots of ANSI art we used from other artists and some of it my own creation as well. I had an ANSI editor (for the life of me I can’t remember the name of it) and made all of the menus and a few logon screens. Man those were fun times … damn Internet, LOL. I’m pretty sure I still have the WildCat BBS installation diskettes in a box somewhere around here. As soon as dial-up ISPs starting showing up our daily usage count went damn near to zero overnight.

Re: Trial by Fire BBS

By znark • • Score: 4, Informative • Thread
I guess the most well-known ANSI art editor for MS-DOS was TheDraw by Ian E. Davis.

I mostly skipped these

By Mononymous • • Score: 3 • Thread

I got my frst 1200 bps modem in 1988.
A full PC screen is 2000 characters, and an ANSI code to switch color or whatever is several bytes itself.
Lettng the BBS render that lovingly-crafted welcome screen took a significant fraction of a minute—and every minute was precious when Mom might want to use the phone at any time.
IIRC, a PCBoard BBS would let you skip it by enternig your name as “FIrstname Lastname y q” or Firstname Lastname n q”, depending on whether or not you wanted color and other effects for the rest of the UI.
I don’t remember if it asked for the password after that, or if you put the password after your last name.

Anyway, I mostly saw these screens only on my first visit or two to a new BBS.

Re:I lived this era

By dunkelfalke • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

Me too. Made an opening source door library and a couple of applications like ANSI colours supporting chat as an example of it, even started developing an open source BBS software, but at some point everyone moved to www, so that project was never finished.

French Lawmakers Back Per-Gigabyte Internet Traffic Tax

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Companies like Google, Netflix, TikTok, and Meta may soon owe the French government, reports Tom’s Hardware:
France has approved a proposed tax that aims to tax the amount of internet data per gigabyte sent to French users in the country… According to minutes released by the National Assembly, members voted 11-10 in support of the motion on October 30 — which now means the new law has been added to the country’s next budget, despite major opposition from the government side and the finance committee rapporteur. The latest amendment, introduced by socialist lawmaker Laurent Lhardit, could see content providers pay €0.055 (roughly $0.06) to the government for every gigabyte of content distributed to French users. With approximately 154 million users and counting in France, the proposal’s authors say such a tax could generate around €10 billion ($11.2 billion) in annual revenue for the government.

The said proposal, though yet to be passed as it must survive further parliamentary scrutiny, aims at companies that generate substantial internet traffic as opposed to taxing their advertising revenue, profits and subscriptions. Its explanatory notes particularly mention Google, Meta, Netflix, Amazon, and content delivery network Akamai as major potential contributors. Notably, TikTok and other similar platforms could fall under this broader scope depending on how these rules are applied. Internet service providers, including Orange Free and Liad, would be required to measure the volume of data and identify the companies responsible for sending it to French users. The Data will then be collected and submitted quarterly to France’s tax administration under the supervision of telecommunications watchdog Arcep.
The measure becomes law if it clears the remaining stages of France’s budget process, the article points out, “with parliament scheduled to vote on the budget’s first section in early November.” “VideoLAN, the French nonprofit organization behind the VLC media player, warned that the proposed levy could cost it more than €1 million annually,” reports CircleID. “Its response illustrates how traffic-based taxation could affect organizations distributing large volumes of data without corresponding commercial revenue.”

They don’t know what they’re talking about

By Arnonyrnous Covvard • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

A tax of 5.5 cents per gigabyte is more than 100 times as expensive as the price of global IP transit, which is now less than $0.10 per megabit/s per month ($0.10 per 324 gigabytes).

Re:They don’t know what they’re talking about

By Vlad_the_Inhaler • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread

per gigabyte sent to French users in the country

I don’t know about French users, but most of the data I receive is solicited - I trigger the process and have some control over the data quantities. This tax only makes sense if it is on the end users. Does Mozilla have to pay if I update my Firefox or Thunderbird? Does Microsoft have to pay if I update my (non-existent) Windows?
If it was April 1 I’d understand this, Stoopid in concept.

Of course I’m often sitting in some form of public transport and the person next to me is looking at a video on his phone, but why should that be a problem?

Re:More riots!

By ArchieBunker • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

No arguments there. The libertarians and “don’t tread on me” cosplayers were all totally silent on ICE. Armed and masked federal agents patrolling city streets and snatching people into rental vans? Sounds like the heavy boot of big government and exactly what they’ve been preparing for.

Re:More riots!

By b0s0z0ku • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

Unfortunately, sometimes violence is in fact the answer to authoritarianism and austerity. If that makes me a Bad Person(tm) for saying that, I own the epithet. MLK Jr succeeded because the Black Panthers provided an alternative vision for white people to ruminate on. Nelson Mandela succeeded because Winnie’s “necklace” was the alternative.

Now, let’s compare societies - is France really the violent one? There’s one confirmed death from the riots in France. Trump’s ICE “heroes” have shot at least 9 people to death in the past year or so, and 60+ have died in detention. The US also has about 3x the rate of fatal shootings by police as adjusted for population, and 4x the general homicide rate.

Re:“Introduced by socialist”

By PsychoSlashDot • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

Of course.

Well, obviously.

It doesn’t disproportionately impact black people, transfer private wealth to 1% of the population, treat non-straight people worse than animals, or spread trivially-discounted lies about scientific and medical facts… so it can’t be from the mind of a conservative.

Conservative trolls don’t do well here.

NASA Seeks Proposals for Reboosting the Hubble Space Telescope

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
The Hubble Space Telescope “will plunge back into the atmosphere in the early-to-mid-2030s,” reports Ars Technica.

So now NASA has released a Request For Information (RFI) “asking commercial companies for ideas on how to reboost, service, or a controlled disposal of Hubble.”
Specifically, NASA is looking for information about companies’ current and near-term capabilities for capturing Hubble and boosting it to an altitude of at least 373 miles (600 km), enhancing the telescope’s performance, or guiding Hubble to a controlled reentry. “The requirement includes that the boost and/or servicing mission must not harm the HST and that this mission is expected to occur by 2032,” NASA wrote in the RFI. The contractor would be responsible for providing the launch vehicle, servicing spacecraft, mission operations, and “crew if applicable.”

NASA is not committing to buying a Hubble rescue mission, but officials want to know who might be interested in mounting such a mission, how much it would cost, and which companies would have a realistic shot at reaching Hubble before it falls out of orbit and burns up on reentry. Orbital dynamicists currently predict that it will likely happen in 2033 or 2034 without intervention, but reentry forecasts can change based on solar activity… A reboost to NASA’s requirement of 373 miles (600 km) would likely keep Hubble in orbit for at least 25 more years.
“NASA last raised the orbit of Hubble in 2002,” the article points out, “when the Space Shuttle Columbia visited the observatory for a servicing mission.”
The final shuttle servicing flight in 2009 did not reboost the telescope’s orbit, and with the retirement of the shuttle fleet two years later, Hubble has steadily lost altitude with no way to stave off eventual destruction… NASA’s newer flagship observatories, sometimes described as successors to Hubble, are not actually one-for-one replacements. Hubble is tuned to observe the Universe in visible and ultraviolet light, while the Webb and Roman telescopes peer deeper into the infrared Universe. Astronomers will likely have to wait for the launch of NASA’s Habitable Worlds Observatory in the 2040s for an improvement on Hubble’s visible and ultraviolet vision.

Exodus

By bill_mcgonigle • • Score: 3 • Thread

It might be too soon but the Exodus Technologies third-order Coulomb devices (IIRC) are built for this kind of very low impulse long duration lifiting.

Getting a rig up there to clamp on to the Hubble is probably the hard part of the project.

High-impulse propulsion is more likely to damage it than low and slow.

Swift orbit boost failed …

By kbahey • • Score: 4, Informative • Thread

Last August, NASA’s contracted a company to boost the Swift space telescope.

But the rescue mission had control and positioning problems, and the whole thing was called off.

I hope that another mission succeeds for Hubble (and perhaps Swift?)

Dozens of Unexplained Drones Have Buzzed America’s Nuclear Plants Since 2024

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Slashdot reader ElectricVs shares this report from American Buildout, a new site covering “the intersection of data centers, energy and power, finance, and Main Street.”
Dozens of unexplained drones flew over and near U.S. nuclear facilities between February 2024 and March 2026, according to records the Nuclear Regulatory Commission made public this week. In all, facility operators filed 67 reports of drones over or near 28 sites in 17 states. They include the Three Mile Island site near Middletown, Pennsylvania., where Constellation Energy plans to restart Unit 1 as the Crane Clean Energy Center. In one incident, about five drones flew roughly 100 feet above the [970-megawatt] reactor building at River Bend Station in Louisiana.

The story was first reported by the publication The Liberation Times. The NRC published the documents on its website in response to the publication’s freedom of information request… Every entry carries the status “Closed Unresolved.”
“Most of the incidents happened after dark,” the article points out, “and none of the records identifies a drone operator. About half of the incidents, 33 of 67, occurred in an eight-week window between Dec. 3, 2024, and Jan. 24, 2025.” (Virginia’s Surry Power Station experienced five different incidents in December of 2024, including one involving “at least eight drones in two waves.”) 100 miles west of Chicago, “drone activity” continued for more than two hours at the Byron Nuclear Station, where two separate drones were reported. In Waterford, Connecticut, “security observed four drones flying back and forth…”

The article notes a 2024 paper from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission citing a 2019 analysis that “concluded U.S. plants had no risk-significant vulnerabilities that adversaries could exploit with commercially available drones to cause radiological sabotage, or theft or diversion of special nuclear material.”

Wanna bet

By Valgrus Thunderaxe • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
drones are flying over everywhere and there’s nothing unique about them being seen above nuclear plants.

Restricted air space?

By Local ID10T • • Score: 3 • Thread

If the air space around these plants is restricted, then it should be defended. Shoot the things down, or triangulate the control signals and arrest the operators.

If it is not, then there is no story here.

Radiological sabotage?

By PPH • • Score: 3 • Thread

Not necessary. Simply knocking the plants off line will suit the anti-nuke fanatics. And provide support for their “to expensive to operate” claims. And a lot cheaper to do than continually filing nuisance lawsuits.

Re:Radiological sabotage?

By ArchieBunker • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

No it’s people who own drones being curious and also stupid. There is no large conspiracy to sabotage anything. We sabotage our own infrastructure by lack of upkeep.

Been happening for 14 years…

By sarren1901 • • Score: 3 • Thread

Then it’s nothing to be worried about. No way the government would of ignored that for 14 years. Sure, we could say the current admin might but Obama and Biden each had 4 years in that 14 years window.

So I’m sure the government knows and it’s nothing to even bother reading about.

They are explained, just not to those who don’t need to know.

Flock Reinstalled Its Cameras After Another City Canceled Its Contract

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Earlier The Drive reported a police chief “had to direct his staff to disconnect the power cords from Flock cameras in Plymouth, Minnesota after Flock Safety ignored and failed to respond to the department’s notice the city was canceling its service.

“But in other instances Flock’s gone and reinstalled cameras without permission,” The Drive reported this week:
On September 29th the city of Dayton, Minnesota posted a community update on its Facebook page alerting residents that Flock had installed and put into service two cameras against the City’s direction without authorization… “The City notified Flock on September 18, 2026, that the program was on hold, and no work orders were to be completed. Unfortunately, the City’s direction was not followed, and the camera was placed back into service without authorization.” The statement continued and noted, “Following the report, City staff reviewed locations throughout the community to determine whether any additional cameras had been reinstalled, and one additional location was identified. The Police Department has been notified, and both cameras will be removed promptly....”

The Minnesota cities of both St. Paul and Crystal told Kare 11 that they removed the Flock cameras themselves following their respective city council votes in August and September respectively. The cameras are stored and are still waiting to be picked up by Flock. Crystal Chief of Police Pete Underthun told Kare 11, “Once we made this decision, I personally went to the locations and removed the cameras and poles myself.” Chief Underthun noted, “We are still working with the company to close out our contract and for them to pick the cameras up from our garage.”

Wow

By ArchieBunker • • Score: 4 • Thread

Police actually listening to what citizens want.

This is proof of who the real customer is

By DigitalSorceress • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

So, if they are putting up cameras without permission / without contracts then it shows clearly (as if we didn’t already know) that even their supposed customers (the police depts) are just a means to an end - to get that data for the REAL customers - which I am sure are big gvt and data brokers

We live in the stupidest / shittiest timeline.

That’s bold.

By MachineShedFred • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread

So are these cities going to cite them for a few hundred counts of trespass?

I’m pretty sure I can’t just go climb up on traffic light support arms and install my own cameras without some kind of legal authority - why can these guys?

Re:That’s bold.

By schwit1 • • Score: 4 • Thread

Flock cameras are often installed on dedicated poles.

I would keep the cameras until Flock identified, under oath, the customer that wanted the cameras reinstalled.

Network Value

By Himmy32 • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Flock knows that their value comes from a large network. This is why their public outreach on ALPRs being equivalent to someone just seeing you in public rings so hollow. Having an large searchable network of historic lets people know is different in knowing where someone is that just happening across them at the grocery store.

They are selling the value of the network, even if they try to convince people on the constitutionality on the individual sensors.

Google’s AI Overviews Lowered Reddit’s Traffic. Its Stock Dropped 29%

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Reddit’s stock plunged 29.22% on Friday, reports CNBC, its worst drop since becoming a public company in 2024.

Thursday Reddit reported a sales growth that was weaker than previous quarters, and also forecast weak sales for the quarter to come (below analysts expectations):
The report comes as the company has seen a shift in its search referral traffic with the rise of Google’s AI Overview. In an interview with CNBC, Reddit CEO Steve Huffman said search-referral traffic from Google went “down meaningfully in this quarter” due to AI… Multiple analysts downgraded the stock following Reddit’s disappointing results, with Citizens noting that “search changes highlight the problem with selling content to Google” and that as referral problems worsen, uncertainty around user growth amid the login requirement switch “puts more pressure on user monetization.”
Reddit’s CEO also said that forcing users to login will help the company’s advertising business. “Reddit is the last platform to provide basically unfettered logged-out access, and that’s largely because of me. I’ve been holding that line.”

“I think users will probably go through the same understanding that I have, which is that it’s a sign of the times. It’s an evolution of how these platforms work.”

Making Things Harder

By darkain • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

“we’ve seen a massive drop in views, so we’re making it more difficult for people to view our content”

Damn, that’s an amazing business idea! Wish I had thought of it.

The rise of Google’s AI Overview

By Mirnotoriety • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
Google originally made money by scraping extracts from other people’s content, directing users to their websites and making money from AdSense advertising. Now, with Google pushing its own AI-generated answers to the top of search results, people have even less reason to visit the original sites.

Of course, in Reddit’s case, there’s a certain irony. Reddit itself relies heavily on unpaid user-generated content. So perhaps there’s a degree of poetic justice here. It’s not quite the same loss as an independent publisher losing traffic to work produced by paid journalists.

Alternatively, end the Google partnership?

By CommunityMember • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
The stated claim is that the Google AI overviews sufficiently answer the questions asked so that people do not need to visit the site and be served ads. Perhaps Reddit should end that partnership that gave Google access in the first place (or charge Google a lot more, if they want to continue to have the data).

Re:Oh no! Reddit’s WOKE SLOP website gets no views

By Mirnotoriety • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread
Q: ClippyAI, what is Reddit mod?

ClippyAI: Reddit mods: the only people who can turn an unpaid internet hobby into a full-blown authoritarian regime. A collection of self-appointed digital dictators whose entire personality revolves around wielding imaginary power over strangers. Imagine being so spectacularly devoid of achievement, purpose or meaningful human interaction that your proudest moment in life is removing someone’s comment and declaring victory. It’s not moderation; it’s a desperate little power fantasy played out by people who couldn’t get authority anywhere else. The Internet’s answer to a neighborhood jobsworth, except with less charm, more resentment and absolutely no fucking self-awareness.

Most social media is regurgiation

By Baron_Yam • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread

Including this post, which others have likely made thousands of times before.

It’s all the same chatter going back and forth as new people arrive and old people depart. Reddit is probably a perfect use case for AI replacement.

Train an AI on the content database and you really don’t need it any longer; you publish the AI and let users talk directly to it to get remixes of the same responses that have been generated millions upon millions of times already.

Yes, including that clever ‘original’ joke you made.

Two US Senators Raise Privacy Concerns About Meta’s ‘Pervert Glasses’

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Meta’s smart glasses face new questions from two U.S. Senators, reports Gizmodo. Oregon Sen. Ron Wyden and Massachusetts Sen. Edward Markey “are requesting that Meta provide more information before Thanksgiving on whether it conducted detailed human rights due diligence and safety testing on the product before releasing it,” reports Gizmodo. The Senators also requested information from Meta about " how it evaluated the privacy risks posed by the glasses, and what kinds of safeguards are currently in place.”
“Although Meta identified risks to bystander privacy and vulnerable populations before launching its glasses in 2021, it nevertheless launched a product tailor-made for invading the privacy of its users and bystanders,” [the senators wrote in a letter Thursday…] The glasses have also been spotted on ICE agents during raids, and have raised potential surveillance concerns. The surveillance fears were even reportedly raised by the New York Police Department’s counterterrorism unit in a memo issued earlier this year....

“Meta’s own disclosures confirm that imagery processed through its glasses’ visual AI features may be retained and used to train AI systems, including with the assistance of human reviewers,” the senators’ letter states, calling the practice an invasion of privacy. “Retaining that material for AI development, thereby extending the period during which it can be accessed, disclosed, or misused, exploits people’s highly sensitive information for Meta’s commercial benefit.”

Someone explain this to me…

By sarren1901 • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

While it’s nice to go after Meta, we all hate them anyway, aren’t we missing out on all the AI training being done on all the media created on cellphones that automatically backup to the cloud?

Seems like the same thing to me, since there’s no data protection laws in this country anyway. Anything sent to the cloud is going to be sold as data and it’s perfectly legal.

These two senator’s, if they cared about privacy, would be pushing national consumer data protection laws.

So by all means, let’s fuck with Meta, but let’s not pretend it’s just them. It’s all of them.

“Pervert Glasses” accurate, but…

By Sebby • • Score: 3 • Thread

I prefer to call those glasses the same way I call Meta[stasize] itself: “Privacy Raping”.

Why are they pervy?

By quall • • Score: 3 • Thread

How are they pervert glasses? I’m just trying to understand because camera glasses have been around for a very long time. Practically every cell phone has a camera and people are constantly recording in public, and in many cases they record in restrooms too.

So I’m just curious, what feature stands out that makes them pervert glasses? I genuinely know nothing about them and this Q is not rhetorical. I googled but don’t really see any special features.

Simple to solve with a regulation

By peterww • • Score: 3 • Thread

They can only record what a person already sees, so the harm is… What exactly? It’s reproducing the video anywhere else, like online. So the solution to that is to criminalize sharing videos and pictures recorded by these glasses, without the participants’ consent. You can replay them for personal use, which is the same thing your own memory can already do.

Re:Wyden

By MachineShedFred • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

He is also my Senator, but I’d really like to know why it takes them 5 years to start asking these questions.

It’s good they are finally being asked, but seriously - this shit launched in 2021, and here we are in the waning days of 2026 and their finally getting around to asking questions about it.

It’s not like they have to comb through all this themselves - they have staffers who can ask questions, brief, and take direction from the senator to advance understanding of the issues and develop a regulatory strategy.

We will never be free of this privacy rape until the legislative branch learns to keep up with the privacy rapists at least a little. 5 years of rape before starting to ask questions is ridiculous.

Supersonic Airliner In Doubt As Company Shifts to Powering AI Data Centers

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Boom Supersonic’s plans to launch its Overture passenger jet by 2029 are facing growing doubts as the company pivots toward manufacturing natural gas turbines for AI data centers. Ars Technica reports:
One of the company’s first customers, United Airlines CEO Scott Kirby, has expressed doubts about Boom’s original plan to deliver the first Overture supersonic airliner in 2029. Kirby’s latest frank assessment came during an interview with the Office Hours: Business Edition podcast that appeared on October 28, 2026. "‘29 is their official timeline,” Kirby told podcast host Monica Langley. “It’s not going to happen in ‘29 — it’s going to take longer.”

[…] Much of Boom’s recent focus has been on developing natural gas turbines to power AI data centers as an additional revenue stream. On October 22, the company unveiled another factory in Centennial, Colorado, dedicated to producing a 42-megawatt natural gas turbine called Superpower for data centers. […] Boom described its new Superpower factory as making turbine parts while still undergoing construction. It aims to deliver the first gas turbines to AI data center customers in mid-2027 while ramping up annual production to 25 turbines in 2028 and 50 turbines by 2029.

[…] Still, Boom has characterized the development of a gas turbine for data centers as being synergistic with its design of the Symphony engine for the Overture airliner. During the October announcement, it also described having completed a prototype turbine core, called Sprint Core, that is intended to eventually power both the Superpower gas turbine and Symphony engine for the airliner. That turbine core is set to undergo testing at the Colorado Air & Space Port, with Boom planning to fire the turbine for the first time before Thanksgiving. That would be a concrete development milestone, but the company still has much to do in proving it can get both its AI data center and supersonic airliner ventures off the ground.

Re:Scott Manley

By drinkmorejava • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread
Well that’s the thing. I was a GE Aviation engineer for years. I’m well aquainted with the growing pains on LM2500s and 6000s, and they’ve had all manner of issues despite being built on cores with millions of hours of experience. It’s not the limited runs that’s problematic, it’s the zero real world use.

Ah so the AI datacenter speculative bubble

By hdyoung • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread
Has made it to THAT stage. During the mortgage crisis, a few years before the whole thing imploded and we nearly had another Great Depression, every in-crisis company was announcing that they were switching to mortgage processing and real estate finance. What was their business previously? Didnt matter. Anything to do with houses, or money, or anything remotely related? Nope, not required. All you had to do was say the word *mortgages* and a drooling idiot would hand you money. It ended badly for basically everyone. Theres nothing I can do with the info. Timing the market is gambling for people with dunning Kruger. And theres no good countercyclical assets anymore, anyways. Nothing better than a standard diversified portfolio, I mean. Buckle up buckaroos cause were goin for a ride.

Re:Scott Manley

By vanye • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

The problem is one of different optimizations.

I worked on a design for a large power generation customer that wanted a derivative of the Rolls-Royce RB-211.

Power generation requires low aerodynamic loads on the blades for 24/7 run times at high efficiency.

Aircraft want high loaded blades because that reduces the number of stages needed to meet the performance - dramatically reducing the weight so that it can fly.

My recollection was that a power generator took 11 stages to compress air to the same as 4 stages of the aero engineâ¦

Re:Scott Manley

By stabiesoft • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread
I expect the reason they’d do it is they are desperate. The mere fact they are repurposing jet engines to make juice demonstrates it. The backlog on nat gas turbines for power is years. The backlog for jet engines is now years, and is so bad that relatively young aircraft are now being sent to the grave for the engines. https://www.cnbc.com/2026/10/2… I’m not sure in the history of man anything has caused so much disruption to the economy as ai/dc’s. War yes, not surprisingly. New ideas, I don’t think so. Computers did not, steam engine did not, cars did not.

Here we go again.

By sugarmatic • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread

The market for their airliner was razor thin to non-existent. It was a shiny object for investment capital just like the Otto Aviation Celera was. This is a pivot to another pipe dream investor pit. The company has never operated the engine under its own combustion. It probably won’t for a long time, and they have zero capacity to absorb the inevitable engine failure mechanics/destruction that will accompany real engine tests: they do not even have one engine built. They don’t have a spare. They are making shiny objects for clueless YouTuber creators to cover, and even more clueless investors to gargle at. That is all.

A person from the Evandale GE plant in Ohio who actually spent 14 years in the group that adapted their 50-70 year old engine designs for fixed asset use has seen the engine up close and claims that Boom is a very, very long way from being able to sustain an engine test from his own look at the same display that Scott Manley outlined in his tour. He also said that “many” of the parts were clearly for show and not actual serviceable parts, and a very different story was proclaimed by the company representative.

To me, this is an investor bubble company that was crowded out by the AI and fusion investment bubbles and is looking for another shiny object to suck up cash. After the AI crash, there will be perhaps 2 -3 years of recovery time if we are lucky before there will be real cash on offer for these kinds of 3rd tier investor cash sponges.

Google’s First Data Center Satellite Is Online and Writing Poetry

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Google’s first experimental space-based data center is operational after launching earlier this month, successfully running its Gemma 4 AI model aboard a satellite and generating a haiku about being in orbit. TechCrunch reports:
The satellite, which carries four Google Tensor Processing Units (TPUs) and generates up to 1 kW of electricity, is intended to pave the way for future networks of close-flying satellites performing large inference workloads in orbit. However, the power demands of the TPU mean it can only turn one on for about 20 minutes at a time, complicating the already tricky business of space-to-ground communications.

After a commissioning process that tested out the satellite’s subsystems over about three weeks, the spacecraft was ready to work. When engineers on the ground sent their first prompt this week, they asked the model pre-loaded onto the satellite, Google DeepMind’s Gemma 4, to write a haiku about being in space. And thus:

Blue marble below
Data streams in silent grace
Starlight feeds my core.

The ongoing test campaign will examine how the chips perform under thermal stress and in the space radiation environment. […] If the TPUs onboard this spacecraft prove capable, the next step will be launching two more satellites equipped with the advanced chips in 2027. Those spacecraft will support higher power generation and demonstrate inter-satellite optical links.

What a joke…

By Archfeld • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

The cost of this is exorbitantly high for the barest minimal access and a huge waste of resources. They could have built 10 solar farms to provide realistic power but instead they are the first in space with a joke.

Happy cooling and triple redundancy.

By hmilz • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
Idiotic. Reminds me of Sci-Fi novels where computer circuits used positrons instead of electrons. As if that were of any advantage.

In space you have to deal with cooling in vacuum without thermal convection but being exposed to sunlight for energy harvesting, triple redundancy to counter radiation (charged particles) induced malfunction, and slow data links compared to ground based communications, just to name a few of the challenges. And that is supposed to be advantageous somehow, while low earth orbits get fuller and fuller, and malicious countries demonstrate satellite hunting satellites?

Re:Just great …

By OrangAsm • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread
A cosmic ray flips
one bit, and now I believe
I am a toaster.

Re:Science-fiction short story

By 93 Escort Wagon • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread

That story was already written 70-odd years ago: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…

Re:What a joke…

By burtosis • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread

The cost of this is exorbitantly high for the barest minimal access and a huge waste of resources. They could have built 10 solar farms to provide realistic power but instead they are the first in space with a joke.

But it’s one (1) kW of compute! It’s almost two (2) 5090 graphics cards!!1! Do you have any idea how much compute that is?! Latency and throughput of data because it’s in orbit don’t even matter at that scale!

Cisco Gives Engineer Unlimited AI Tokens To Rewrite Legacy Code

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Fortune:
Gen Z can’t catch a break. Entry-level jobs are vanishing; some 40% of bosses say they plan to hire fewer grads because AI can do the job cheaper, and young workers are routinely slammed for showing up late and refusing to put in overtime for free. Cisco’s president and chief product officer Jeetu Patel isn’t buying it — he’s just handed one of the company’s biggest jobs to a 27-year-old he found hidden in the org chart “five levels” below him. “I’ve given him unlimited tokens because he’s going to refactor code,” Patel told Fortune at a small roundtable dinner. “So I’m like, you can go, you can go nuts.”

The “him” is Padmanabhan Krishnamurthy, or “Paddy,” as Patel affectionately calls him. He joined Cisco in 2025 after the $429 billion tech giant acquired EzDubs, the real-time translation startup Krishnamurthy cofounded in 2023. And despite coming in as a former founder with CEO experience, he was, in Patel’s words, “buried away in the organization doing something unstrategic.” That changed when Patel dropped into Cisco’s San Francisco office, and the pair got talking.

Krishnamurthy reckoned he could rewrite Cisco’s legacy code with a two-person team. Patel says even the most AI-forward people on his own team weren’t thinking that way. So he has given himself four weeks to prove it, with the final goal of rewriting 98% of Cisco’s legacy code within 24 months. Now, he’s on the hunt for more Paddys: young hires who will “challenge the system and the status quo,” or, as he puts it, be “an energizer bunny that just goes out and kind of revs everyone up.”
“The only way for us to keep accelerating is to make sure we’re surrounded by people with a broad range of experience,” said Patel. “Roughly one-third of my team is experienced, scaled operators who understand how the Cisco engine works. The second third are systems thinkers from the market who bring the outside-in perspective. And the final third is made of entrepreneurial founders, CEOs, and engineers who are AI-native who operate in founder mode.”
“Either of these groups by themselves aren’t nearly as potent as when all three work together. It’s what creates magic.”

Re:Step up from their normal slop?

By orionpi • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

Excluding TCP from a router’s usual packet processing makes a lot of sense: it’s job is to forward _packets_ not byte streams. The lack of memory protection makes sense when you consider the hardware software originally ran on. It did accumulate it to into large and unwieldy mass that prevented adopting memory isolation for some time. But considering contemporary software, Cisco did well at their core competency.

Re:Cool

By phantomfive • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread
Cisco is known for having low-quality programmers in house. When they want something serious done, they often use contractors (or wait until another company does it and then buy that company). A profitable approach has been to figure out what CISCO wants, then build it and wait for them to buy you.

Re:Make sense

By serviscope_minor • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

While LLMs will probably make that worse

Why though? I’m not saying LLMs will not write security holes, they definitely will if you don’t very explicitly tell them not to. But even the nerfed public ones are not bad at spotting security holes compared to people. Most people are notoriously bad at this, but there have also been enough that a huge number of CVEs have been well documented. These are all in the training data and LLMs can absolutely spot these patterns. And they can do it without getting bored on software that was written before those CVEs were found anyway.

Re:Cool

By arglebargle_xiv • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread
It sounds like someone at Cisco took whatever drugs Andy Yen is currently tripping on. This rewrite will have one of two outcomes, it’ll either have to be bug-for-bug compatible with all of Cisco’s existing products in order to no lose the decades of knowledge and existing configs that people have built up working with their stuff, or if it’s a full rewrite with new capabilities and features and bugs, so essentially a new product, then why on earth would anyone go back to Cisco and not get something better and cheaper from anyone but Cisco?

Do I have this right?

By pla • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
Two engineers (one of whom is a stuffed shirt being thrown a bone post-acquisition) are going to rewrite Cisco’s legacy code using AI and an unlimited budget.

I’m sorry, can even the most delusional pro-AI executive out there seriously say that with a straight face? This just plain fails the sniff test - Are they establishing a scapegoat for an already-failing project? Honoring some contractual landmine EZDubs managed to sneak in? Straight-up insurance fraud?

If this is exactly what it looks like at face value, excuse me while I go short Cisco stock.

Apple Is Entering Its Slop Era

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
In an opinion piece for 404 Media, Matthew Gault argues that Apple has entered its “slop era,” abandoning its reputation for innovative hardware in favor of recycled ideas and questionable design choices. Here’s an excerpt:
My ears perked up when I heard Apple’s new foldable phones were cracking. I licked my lips when the company announced it’s releasing a touch-screen laptop. This was a company that once charged $19 for a polishing cloth, asked $200 for a VESA mount, and sold $700 wheels for the Mac Pro. Now it’s borrowing tired ideas from its competitors and launching hardware its previous leaders rejected.

The once dominant company is struggling to find its feet in an AI-driven post-Tim Cook world. John Ternus is the new CEO — a 25 year veteran of the company with a track record of pushing harebrained hardware schemes like the much reviled Touch Bar and lawsuit inducing butterfly keyboard.

With Ternus at the helm, I feel there’s a good chance Apple’s best days are behind it, that it will have to make do with less, that it’s declasse. Apple, blindsided by AI and relying on crowdpleasing hardware gimmicks, is downwardly mobile. It’s in its slop era. The company that once asked consumers to “Think Different” is now releasing hardware that’s just like everything else on the market.

“Entering”?

By 93 Escort Wagon • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

I use a lot of Apple gear, but frankly I’d argue they entered the era not long after Jobs died.

Damned if they do…

By Rendus • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

Damned if they don’t.

Don’t immediately ride the throbbing shaft of AI? You were blindsided by it.

Don’t follow the trend of folding phones immediately? You’re not innovating.

Waiting for everyone else to solve the kinks before releasing your own version of the product? You’re not innovating.

The “not innovating” claim every iterative phone release is also kinda silly, since the “slab of glass with some cameras” thing is largely a solved problem. There’s not really too much room for Thinking Different there.

Apple does one of two things: Go absolutely bleeding-edge (Apple Silicon Macs, Firewire, all-USB, no floppy drive, no headphone jack, etc), or trailing-edge after someone else did the R&D (folding phone screens, etc).

Barring the hinge issue, it sounds like their folding screen is actually pretty innovative, with the matte layer and layered screen design to minimize the prevalence of the crease and the matte layer absorbing some damage as a renewable component, serving as a screen protector.

Re:Cracked screens

By b0s0z0ku • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
Here’s my question: what happens if you keep the phone in your pocket and a coin or key slips into the fold? Or are Apple users too cool to do cheugy things like pay with cash and use physical keys?

Rumors of my demise…

By Himmy32 • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

Apple is still the 1000 pound gorilla in the room with a CEO that’s been doing their design work for a long time. I mean it’s been a decade an a half since we’ve heard that the sky is falling for an Apple without Steve Jobs.

I might not be the largest Apple fan, but call me a little skeptical about hearing the company is dying. It didn’t happen when Tim Apple took away the headphone jack, released a stupid, expensive “iPhone pocket”, or a mixed reception VR Headset. Apple might not have the perfect AI assistant with Siri, but they haven’t over extended into revenue losing bubble either.

Ternus has been around look enough to understand that the goose mostly lays golden eggs. The goose probably isn’t cooked just because last egg doesn’t appear as shiny, even if calling it “slop” makes for a engagement driving news article.

Re:Damned if they do…

By ZombieCatInABox • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

For years now I’ve been hearing and reading people bitching that Apple didn’t add touch screens to their MacBook line.

Now they have. And people are still bitching.

Meta Settles Another Social Media Addiction Case Just Before Trial

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot
Meta has reached an undisclosed settlement in another social media addiction lawsuit, avoiding a trial scheduled for next month and leaving Snap as the sole remaining defendant. Engadget reports:
The lawsuit was brought by an 18-year-old woman from Mississippi known as K.D.B who, according to Reuters, has “described staying awake for hours scrolling social media, losing focus in class and engaging in self-harm using methods shown in social media videos.” Jury selection kicked off earlier this week in Los Angeles.

On Friday, K.D.B’s lawyer announced that she had reached a settlement with Meta after previously settling with TikTok and YouTube. “We remain committed to improving safety for kids on social media apps and holding tech companies accountable, and we are pleased to have brought this matter to a just resolution on behalf of our client,” attorney Emily Jeffcott said in a statement.

Now, Snap is the only remaining defendant in the case. CEO Evan Spiegel is expected to testify in the trial that could last several weeks. If he does take the stand, it will be the first time the Snap founder has appeared in a social media addiction trial. Snap previously settled in another high-profile case involving similar claims. A jury later ruled against Meta and YouTube in the trial and the two were ordered to pay $6 million in damages.