Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Skydance Offers Buyouts, Gives 5-Day RTO Order
  2. Firefox Tries to Bring Back the Internet’s ‘Good Old Days’
  3. Instagram Chases YouTube With a Push For Longer, Widescreen Videos
  4. Walter Koenig, Chekov On Original ‘Star Trek,’ Dies At 90
  5. Highway Thieves Are Spoofing GPS To Steal Millions In Data Center-Bound Cargo
  6. Apple Updates the iPad Mini With a Larger OLED Display
  7. Microsoft Offers Mass Buyouts For Roughly a Quarter of Its Workforce
  8. Anthropic Files For IPO
  9. Reddit’s Largest Open Source Community Dumbfounded By AI Ban: ‘I Guess Linux Is No Longer Allowed?’
  10. Amazon Deforestation Fell To Lowest Level Since 1988 - And Silva Wins Reelection
  11. Microsoft Announces Open Source Tool Evaluating Your Software’s Optimization For AI Coding Agents
  12. 25% of Incoming Pull Requests May Be AI Slop, Finds Study From Linux Foundation Research
  13. Systemd Merges Support for Rust Programs
  14. AI Use Convinces California Math Professor There’s ‘No Point’ Grading Homework
  15. A Newly Proposed Linux Filesystem Can Fix Corrupted Data

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Skydance Offers Buyouts, Gives 5-Day RTO Order

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Skydance, as it begins integrating Paramount and Warner Bros. Discovery, is offering voluntary buyouts to some employees and imposing a five-day-a-week office requirement. Layoffs are also expected as the company targets more than $6 billion in annualized cost savings within three years. Variety reports:
The new program was outlined by chairman and CEO David Ellison and co-CEO Ynon Kreiz in a memo to staffers Monday. “As we bring our teams together, we recognize that not everyone will see their future here, and we respect that. To give eligible employees the option to move on in a way that works for them, we are introducing a Voluntary Buyout (VBO) Program,” the execs wrote. “Those who qualify will receive an individual communication with their personalized details and terms, and a window to decide whether to accept this one-time offer.”

They added, “Please know we don’t take any of this lightly. We are clear about what we’re building: a company that tells the stories people around the world love, embraces new ways to connect with audiences, and leads the next era of media and entertainment. We have the talent, the creative firepower and the ambition to do it, and we will get there together.”

[…] In the Oct. 26 memo, Ellison and Kreiz also said the new Skydance is moving to a mandatory five-days-per-week in-office policy across the company. “We believe in-person collaboration is vital to our culture and to the success of our business. Especially in a creative company like ours, the best ideas come from people in the same room, sharing perspectives, challenging one another and solving problems,” the execs said. “We truly believe this is in the best interest of our company and our people. We’ve seen the benefits firsthand at Paramount, and we want every part of Skydance to share in them.”

RTOAI

By anonymouscoward52236 • • Score: 3 • Thread

I am going to coin a new term. Return To Office as AI. ðY (That is to say: not. We don’t need you anymore. Here’s a buyout.)

ha

By gabrieltss • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread
The “mandatory five-days-per-week in-office policy” is all about quite firing.

Firefox Tries to Bring Back the Internet’s ‘Good Old Days’

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Mozilla launched a new ad campaign for Firefox that leverages early internet nostalgia in a bid to win back users who switched browsers. “Today’s internet tracks you, interrupts you, and asks for permissions it already took. But it wasn’t always that way, and it’s not how it’s supposed to work,” writes Mozilla CEO Anthony Enzor-DeMeo in a post on LinkedIn. “It’s how a few companies decided it should work, because it pays.”

“We’re making a different bet at Firefox. Remember us? Well, we’re still here, and we don’t think the internet should be like this…” The ad features viral internet stars from yesteryear, including Tay Zonday of “Chocolate Rain” fame, Gary Brolsma of “Numa Numa”, Noah Ritter, better known as the “Apparently Kid”, and Laina Morris, the face of the “Overly Attached Girlfriend” meme, among others.

I’m not watching their fucking ad

By drinkypoo • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

Ads are just pissing on your brain, so fuck them for this in the first place.

Bring back the good old days of Firefox when it contained nothing unnecessary and everything else was an addon and themes could do more than change colors and we’ll talk.

Instagram Chases YouTube With a Push For Longer, Widescreen Videos

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Instagram is testing a new longform, horizontal video format called “Features" as it pushes further into YouTube territory and expands its presence on TVs. The Verge reports:
Instagram boss Adam Mosseri has been against doing longform video on the platform “for a long time,” he says in a six-and-a-half-minute video (here’s the widescreen version) with VP of product Tessa Lyons, saying that “one of my concerns has been, how do we make sure that we keep Instagram not just about entertainment, but about connecting with friends.” If you watch a longform video, “it’s a lot of Reels, photos, and carousels that you might not have sent to a friend,” meaning less likes and shares. Now, though, the team is working on making shortform and longform video “symbiotic,” according to Mosseri, like podcasts or comedy specials that can be both long videos and broken up into shorter ones.

The announcement of this widescreen video push also follows the launch of Instagram’s TV app late last year. That app launched first as a Reels-focused experience and as a pilot for Amazon Fire TV devices in the US, but it’s since expanded to Google TVs, Samsung TVs and Apple TV, and Instagram launched new features like the ability to watch Stories earlier this year.

Walter Koenig, Chekov On Original ‘Star Trek,’ Dies At 90

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Longtime Slashdot reader schwit1 shares a report from CBS News:
Walter Koenig, the actor who played Pavel Chekov in the original “Star Trek” series and several movies, has died, his rep confirmed to CBS News. He was 90. Koenig died Sunday night at his home in the North Hollywood neighborhood of Los Angeles, talent rep Zachery McGinnis said in a statement. He died surrounded by his daughter and niece, McGinnis said.

In ‘Star Trek,’ Ensign Chekov was the sole member of the spaceship Enterprise bridge staff from what was the Communist bloc. His friendly, supportive presence showed how the rival nations (in the far-off future in which the show was set) were capable of working together. Speaking heavily Russian-accented English, Chekov embodied stereotypical Russian personality traits, including fierce pride, love of poetry and blind loyalty.
“Through countless convention appearances and interactions with fans, he shared his kindness, wit, and appreciation with everyone fortunate enough to meet him. He understood what Star Trek meant to people and embraced the community that grew around it,” McGinnis said. “Thank you, Walter, for the memories, the inspiration, and for boldly going where few have gone before.”
Watch some of the Chekov’s best moments on YouTube.

Namesake

By TwistedGreen • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

“Perhaps man has a hundred senses, and when he dies only the five senses that we know perish with him, and the other ninety-five remain alive.”
- Anton Chekhov, The Cherry Orchard

Farewell

By LondoMollari • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

We will meet you up ahead, Mister Bester, in the place where no shadows fall.

A great actor

By Anonymous Coward • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

The obituaries will all talk about Star Trek. But for me it was playing Bester in Babylon 5 that really showed his acting ability - a truly brilliant performance. He could be go from charming to chilling in a flash. He took a role with some serious depth and really made it his own.

Glad I Saw Him In Person

By XopherMV • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
I put off going to Star Trek conventions for years. I always assumed I could go in the future and see all these people who played my favorite characters. The death of Nichelle Nichols finally made me realize that if I ever wanted to see these people while they were alive, I needed to finally do it. I finally went to my first convention in 2024. I saw Koenig, Shatner, and the crews of the other shows. It was fantastic.

I am sad I didn’t go earlier when I could have also seen Nichols, Nimoy, Kelley, and Doohan. I wish I realized much earlier that they had a limited time left for me to see them myself.

Point being: if you want to see these folks who played characters you loved, don’t wait! We all have a limited amount of time on Earth. If it’s important to you to sit in the same room, breathe the same air, and listen to their stories in person, then do it now. Don’t put it off to later.

Re:Farewell

By jfdavis668 • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
He did such a good job in that role.

Highway Thieves Are Spoofing GPS To Steal Millions In Data Center-Bound Cargo

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Highway thieves have stolen more than $100 million in data center equipment since June, employing increasingly sophisticated tactics such as forging driver IDs and spoofing GPS tracking systems. NBC News (paywalled) reports that thieves have “made away with more than $100 million in data center freight.” Ars Technica reports:
Here’s how they said thieves get away with it: First, thieves hack freight brokers’ accounts on shipment-listing websites and post fake shipments to lure real bids, then send a malicious link to any trucking companies that respond. Once victims click, thieves install software to take control of their accounts and start bidding on real shipments. Sometimes, a real delivery driver is hired to collect the cargo, unaware of the scam, and other times fake driver’s licenses are used to get accomplices hired. Either way, the goods are eventually transferred to a driver working with the thieves to resell the gear, and, in one of the largest thefts, tracking coordinates were spoofed to prevent digital monitoring. Equipment commonly targeted includes “servers, fiber-optic cables, computer memory chips, copper wires, and bitcoin mining machines,” NBC News reported.

Some trailers hit seem to be carrying only data center equipment, like two stolen freights found in Illinois. The Cook County Sheriff’s Office estimated those contained $300,000 worth of copper wire spools and about $1 million in “custom-made data center modular power solutions equipment,” NBC News reported. Other trucks impacted were carrying additional freight, like a Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department case where “data center cooling equipment” bound for Deepcool AI was recovered among nicotine pouches, televisions, shoes, printers, speakers, and skin care cosmetics. Experts worry that means Americans may be broadly harmed by the thefts, not just the AI industry.

While some stolen goods have been recovered, in two of the largest thefts that NBC News found, none of the equipment was found, and off-duty cops hired to escort the shipments were targeted in hit-and-runs. […] Broadly, cargo thieves are infiltrating email accounts to find lucrative shipments, misdirecting shipments, disrupting GPS tracking, and using AI to create fake driver’s licenses to get accomplices hired as delivery drivers. LASD’s Sgt. David Pantoja told NBC News “that’s how most of it is being done,” which is a big shift from the past when highway thefts were largely opportunistic.

What’s The Average?

By SlashbotAgent • • Score: 3 • Thread

What is the historical average rate of truck freight theft?

This headline sounds like an Oceans Eleven fantasy. The actual article more mundane than the headline. But the story is still interesting and oddly sophisticated for truck freight theft. Despite that, I have a nagging feeling that this isn’t really novel or an increase and that it is being reported simply because data centers are the current news cycle.

Re:What’s The Average?

By Whateverthisis • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
I worked in construction a few years (decades actually) ago. When copper surged in price, which was mainly due to China joining the WTO and starting it’s massive infrastructure build out, several materials shot up in price. Copper in particular was notorious because there were plenty of recycling centers who would pay cash and asked no questions as it was unregulated at the time; it was easy to convert to cash quickly. We had guys get caught with 50lbs of copper wire under their shirts, because the paid price for copper went from $1.00/lb to around $4.00/lb; for a guy doing general labor 50lbs of stolen copper was another $200 cash he made that day. The petty theft guys were a nuisance, but the industrial scale theft was enormous.

Copper is now $6.80-ish/lb. A spool of copper wire headed to a data center might be worth $8,000-$10,000 at a scrap yard.

Some research is showing that the number of incidents is relatively flat, but the value of incidents has nearly doubled because data center infrastructure is far more valuable than retail goods which were historically hit. This report shows that truck theft incidents are down around 26%, but overall losses are double. So it’s technically a valid story on Slashdot, as it is the overall value of the goods in the truck headed to data centers that has shifted the pattern just because of it’s far higher value and relatively easy way to turn the goods into money.

Same tactic used to steal bourbon

By smooth wombat • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread
In June, over $500,000 worth of bourbon was stolen out from under the nose of a warehouse in Phildelphia. The first paragraph:

The truck looked legitimate. The paperwork appeared routine. And in the middle of a workday, about 1,800 cases of bourbon were loaded onto the truck as if it were just another shipment.

Later in the story, the explanation for how this happened is nearly identical to these tech thefts:

Newman said investigators believe the theft may be tied to a “complex ring” targeting high-value consumer products. The perpetrators appeared to impersonate an existing trucking company, using a company name, phone number and other details to gain trust and secure the load, he said.

“They basically try and look like, sound like ⦠a legitimate trucking company,” Newman said. “They spoof the company name, they spoof the trucking dispatcher.”

In the company’s news release, it said the theft appeared to have been carried out with knowledge of “logistics operations and product movement schedules,” suggesting planning and coordination.

Apple Updates the iPad Mini With a Larger OLED Display

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Apple has unveiled a redesigned iPad Mini with a larger 8.5-inch OLED display, an A20 Pro chip, twice the peak brightness and slimmer bezels while maintaining roughly the same footprint. It starts at $699 ($200 more than its predecessor) and will be available November 6. The Verge reports:
Despite having a slightly bigger display than the 8.3-inch screen on its predecessor, Apple says the device maintains the same small footprint thanks to bezels that are 24 percent slimmer. The iPad Mini is 5.4mm thick as well, making it thinner and lighter than the previous generation, according to Apple. It also comes with an IP67 rating for protection against water and dust.

Aside from an OLED display, the new iPad Mini features an upgraded A20 Pro chip. This enables support for some of Apple’s new Siri AI features, including the ability to tweak the expressiveness and pace of the assistant’s voice. Apple says the upgraded iPad Mini also comes with two times the peak brightness than the previous generation. iPad Mini’s 12MP front-facing camera is now on the long edge of the device, making it easier for video calls in landscape orientation.

Microsoft Offers Mass Buyouts For Roughly a Quarter of Its Workforce

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Seattle Times:
Microsoft is offering buyouts to about 60,000 employees, or roughly a quarter of its workforce, as the company tries to control its head count while avoiding layoffs. The Redmond-based tech giant announced Monday morning that eligible employees at the vice president level and below in the U.S., Canada, India and the United Kingdom would receive a “voluntary exit offer” of a standard severance package, based on their location.

In a memo to employees, Microsoft Chief People Officer Amy Coleman said the move was building off the voluntary retirement program earlier this year, which was available to more than 8,700 U.S.-based employees, roughly one-third of whom took the offer. Since May 2025, Microsoft has been trying to reduce its corporate workforce, first through waves of mass layoffs and now through more creative buyout programs. The company laid off about 15,000 employees last year over the course of several months, affecting about 3,200 Washington-based workers.
The report notes that the layoffs have continued this year, though on a smaller scale and largely concentrated in the company’s gaming division.

Quick bit of context

By bmajik • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

An article says:

>Employees at internal levels 64 and below received one week of base pay per six months of service, for example, and employees at levels 65 to 67 will receive two weeks of base pay per six months of service, according to offers reviewed by Business Insider.

Within MSFT, here’s what those “levels” mean for software dev positions:

68-70: Partner & Above [entirely different comp structure; limited quota]
65-67: Principal
63-64: Senior
61-62: Engineer 2
59-60: Engineer

When I left in 2022, you unofficially had a limited amount of time to make it to the senior band. The “up or out” philosophy very much applied to junior engineers; if you didn’t have the potential to make senior engineer (because you hadn’t made it yet after x years), you were managed out.

People who made it to Principal could park their careers at the principal level and stay there indefinitely, so long as they were providing good results (but were still subject to random layoffs not based on their own performance)

The VEOs and other “voluntary” downsizing plans have been targeting older, higher-level folks. Yes, those folks are more expensive. They are also more male, more American, and more white.

Re: I’d take it

By FudRucker • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread
Electrician, plumbing, welding are three skilled trades that AI will never replace

This always seems bass-ackwards

By 93 Escort Wagon • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

The people who will quickly jump on this will largely be their best employees - the ones who are confident they can walk into another job. But I’m sure the company knows this, so it must be part of the plan somehow.

Re:Fire me

By pla • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread
The highest UI check in the country is in Washington state, and only comes out to $1208/week, for a maximum of 26 weeks (barring certain exceptional circumstances). A Principal Engineer (level 65) at Microsoft averages just shy of $246k/year and this buyout is offering up to 39 weeks total.

Weekly, that’s $4.7k vs $1.2k. Total, that’s $184k vs 31k.

I can guarantee nobody smart enough to be an engineer at Microsoft (as much as we might make fun of their culture and products) is dumb enough to fail that one-question math exam.

Re:I’d take it

By Sebby • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

“He ended up with about the same or higher pay as a contractor as I recall.”

Are you including health care and retirement benefits in that higher pay?

You’re assuming these were out of pocket costs borne by the user, as happens in the United Shitholes of America (new official name, because the rest of the world can rename things too!)

Anthropic Files For IPO

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Anthropic has filed to go public on the Nasdaq under the ticker ANT, setting the stage for a potentially record-setting IPO that could value the Claude developer at more than $2 trillion. Alongside the extraordinary cost of its AI expansion, Anthropic warned that it “may not generate sufficient revenue to achieve or sustain profitability in the future.”

“While we have experienced significant revenue growth in recent periods, our business is highly capital intensive,” the company said. “Our revenue growth may not be sustainable, and our rate of growth may decrease.” NBC News reports:
The filing did not include a potential share price, the number of shares to be offered or a valuation for the whole company, all of which will be determined after Anthropic holds a “road show” with investors, prospective investors and its bankers. […] The company plans to spend at least $110 billion with Amazon for cloud services through April 2036 and another $120 billion with SpaceX through 2029. Anthropic also said it planned to spend $115 billion with Google and $45 billion with Microsoft, both through 2033, for computing infrastructure.

The filing said that the company recorded revenue growth of “1,368% year over year for the three months ended June 30, 2026.” The cost of renting servers and chips grew by 300% over the same period. Anthropic’s net loss for the first six months of 2026 was $80.7 billion. For the entirety of 2025, the company reported a $42 billion net loss.

Anthropic added that it expects its current cash and sales to be sufficient for the next 12 months but warned that future revenue growth depends on a number of important factors, including the cost of infrastructure. As a result, it said, “we may be required to seek additional financing sooner than we currently anticipate.” The company said it has raised about $141 billion of capital through the end of June and is sitting on $112.4 billion of cash.

Pensions

By Anonymous Coward • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

Blessed by SEC as a standard issue equity for sale on Nasdaq, the fund managers of the Western world are going to dump everyone’s pension money into this.

Meanwhile, China is distilling models and giving them away, and even IBM is arguing that open models are entirely sufficient for business needs.

A lot of money is going to money heaven.

IPO ~= Rug Pull :: Venture Capital

By JakFrost • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

This IPO is a rug pool by venture capital investment that has already dropped their money into the company for control and now the public will cash them out with the IPO offer.

The debt bagage of this company is just a huge and the possibility of them ever becoming profitable is near impossible since the market is saturated with their competitors, their models are not winning well if anybody else, especially when the competitors like Google and Facebook/Meta and others that are willing to spend even more money who have revenue sources outside of just pure AI token spending.

Even SpaceX can get their money from their internet service order rocket ships or possibly Tesla if they were rich but anthropic is a standalone.

Perhaps this is another Bitcoin or other dot-com company going bust in the near future.

I believe the future will include AI but it will be small models that are self-contained and that people have on their own equipment and not not spending vast amounts of money on paying for tokens to third-party companies.

Patrick Boyle on YouTube does a great job explaining the vastness of the debt along with the Casual Finance channel.

Capturing All Future Value

By Luthair • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
I feel like this is the new trend with venture capital, attempt to capture all future gains at IPO and hope the muppet bag holders believe the hype.

They have to have a stock ticker

By toxonix • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

If they don’t have public stock, they can’t issue stock options with long end-weighted vesting schedules to dupe employees into thinking they’re getting paid. If 80% of your RSUs vest AFTER you’ve been laid off in the latest round of AI efficiency fires/rehires, the CFO wins again.

Paraphrase

By whitroth • • Score: 3 • Thread

The Batman: “investors are a superstitious and cowardly lot”.

Meanwhile, Mu$k admits that SpaceX is $40B in debt for AI chips, and access to capital is drying up.

As for “investing” in Anthropic? To steal Charlie Stross’ comment on crypto, “quick, invest now, or you’ll miss your chance to lose everything.”

Reddit’s Largest Open Source Community Dumbfounded By AI Ban: ‘I Guess Linux Is No Longer Allowed?’

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Kotaku reports:
r/opensource, Reddit’s primary “subreddit for everything open source related,” has banned all AI-assisted and AI-related projects.... As reported by The Verge, the subreddit’s October 24 post, titled “Your tokens aren’t valuable: No more AI,” features four new main rules: all projects must now be at least “1 year old,” have “multiple contributors,” be posted by someone who must “speak English,” and cannot be “made by” or “intended for” AI… [T]he ban on AI is simple; as the subreddit’s moderators explain, “AI, as it exists today, is incongruent to this Open Source community.” Unsurprisingly, this is the part that’s upset the majority of the users in the thread....

[T]he moderator who posted the new guidelines stated in a separate comment that the overwhelmingly negative response is due to “some guy on twitter claiming to be alternative news” who posted an “opinionated editorial pointing hundreds of people to the thread.” Given the timing of when the thread was posted, alongside the fact that the X post in question mentions “the Linux kernel,” they are presumably referring to this post by The Lunduke Journal. The moderator may be correct, as almost all of the top comments on the post are from users who have never posted in r/opensource before.
The use of AI “doesn’t change whether something is open source or not,” complained one commenter, who added “I guess Linux is no longer allowed here? Linus uses AI for kernel development now.”

The moderator has since updated their post to acknowledge that Redditors have now already created a rival community called r/OpenSourceAIAllowed — plus three more alternatives:

UPDATE (10/26): Monday saw a new comment from the moderator stressing that “Adjustments will be made.”

“Linux is not, nor could conceivably ever be banned. Interpreting any set of rules as such is simply bad faith. Someone’s pet project pumped out in two claude code session limits will not be welcome. The line is somewhere between those, and it will likely move over time from continuous feedback.

“We will cater to humans, and as many and as inclusively as possible. No rule will ever target or favor any ethnicity or social strata.”


Well…

By Rosco P. Coltrane • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

My opinion is that AI will kill Linux eventually. Not now, not when Linus uses it, because Linus knows how to code and is careful. But eventually the crappy vibe-coded junk will seep into the kernel. And then you’ll get Microsoft-style code quality issues.

Projects primarily written in emacs not allowed

By LindleyF • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread
Vim only!

Re:Well…

By drinkypoo • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

I think AI copyright is going to kill Linux. Allowing uncopyrightable code into your project could be determined by a court to destroy your whole license, forcing ALL your code to be released as uncopyrightable and putting GPL-licensed code into the public domain where it can be monetized by corporations without having to give anything back. None of this is how copyright law is supposed to work, but if I’ve learned one thing about governments and laws and courts it’s that they often aren’t created for our benefit.

Screw you guys, I’m going home!

By Deathlizard • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

Wolvereness. Hmm. Where have I heard that name before…

Oh yeah…

So not only has he pulled a Cartman on the leading Minecraft mod platform at the time, but now a leading Subreddit as well.

English

By PPH • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

someone who must “speak English,”

Sorry Texas. Y’all on yer own now.

Amazon Deforestation Fell To Lowest Level Since 1988 - And Silva Wins Reelection

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Brazil’s 80-year-old president Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva was re-elected Sunday, reports the Guardian, “defeating his far-right opponent, Flávio Bolsonaro, to claim a historic fourth term in power.”

And the results could impact the climate, suggests the Associated Press, since under da Silva the annual deforestation rate in the Amazon fell to its lowest level since records began in 1988:
Official satellite data showed the rainforest lost 3,335 square kilometers (1,300 square miles) from Aug. 2025 through July 2026, the period used to calculate the annual rate…

During Jair Bolsonaro’s presidency, from 2019 to 2022, Amazon deforestation surged by about 60%, with more than 45,000 square kilometers (17,400 square miles) cleared, according to official data. Under Lula, deforestation has fallen 71% since 2023, the government said. One of Lula’s first moves after taking office in January 2023 for a third, non-consecutive term was to revive the Action Plan for the Prevention and Control of Deforestation in the Legal Amazon, known by its Portuguese acronym, PPCDAm. Launched in 2004 during his first administration, the plan had been shelved under Bolsonaro....

The plan has four pillars: strengthening monitoring and enforcement; promoting a sustainable economy; managing protected areas and determining how undesignated public forests should be used; and using regulations and financial incentives to curb deforestation. Measures included restoring sanctions for illegal forest clearing detected by satellites, a practice seen as the most effective tool to curb deforestation that was halted under Bolsonaro. The government also proposed barring properties with illegal deforestation from receiving bank loans and allocated more funding to priority Amazon municipalities that demonstrated reductions in forest loss. It also funded efforts to fight environmental crime and develop subsidized credit for sustainable businesses in the Amazon…

Deforestation and other land-use changes are Brazil’s largest sources of greenhouse gas emissions, which drive global warming. The stakes are especially high in the Amazon, which stores vast amounts of carbon dioxide and generates atmospheric moisture that helps regulate weather far beyond South America… Degradation from wildfires, logging and drought affects about 40% of the Amazon and has outpaced clear-cutting in recent years. A strong El Niño, a periodic warming of the equatorial Pacific, could intensify those threats in 2026 and 2027 by bringing hotter, drier conditions that fuel wildfires.
The article notes that Lula’s reelection campaign promised zero net deforestation by 2030, plus restoration to offset all forest loss, legal or illegal.

Re:Following the Trump playbook

By laughing_badger • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

Not really. It’s not unprecedented elsewhere and Brazil only has about 40 years of events to compare to, which is a small dataset - it was going to happen for the first time at some time.

It’s a pretty standard outcome where you’ve got a candidate where people who don’t like them also don’t agree on what they do want, but are very sure that it’s not them. It looks like people rallied around Da Silva because they absolutely didn’t want Bolsonaro.

The results should certainly be checked in the normal way, but winning the first round and losing the second isn’t a smoking gun. It also depends on what has happened in the news in the meantime.

Re:Following the Trump playbook

By thegarbz • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

You don’t find it a bit odd that Bolsonaro defeated Lula in the election, but didn’t get 50% of the vote, and then loses in the runoff? That is unprecedented in Brasil. Perhaps it does warrant some scrutiny.

No, that’s not odd at all. Many parts of the world have run-off elections. It concentrates the vote to prevent like parties splitting the community. In many parts of the world these kinds of run-off elections end up flipping the result, it’s a natural result of that election system.

E.g. You have the following parties with the following results:
Right party A - 40% of the vote
Left party A - 31% of the vote
Left party B who is like A but also want to implement policy X - 29% of the vote.

In the runoff now the people who voted for Left party B get to decide, are they hyper focused on policy X to the point where they vote Right wing or abandon the election? In most cases the answer is no, so people who voted for Left party B will vote for Left party A in the run-off and the result flips.

This is perfectly normal for that kind of system and it’s actually bizarre that it hasn’t happened before in a country where a run-off system exists.

Re:Following the Trump playbook

By tsqr • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

I see that Flávio Bolsonaro is refusing to accept the result. How long before the attack on the National Congress Palace?

His father did something similar as an incumbent, and his supporters did just that. Bolsonaro ended up in prison as a result. Here in the US, we pardon rioters like that and give them jobs as ICE agents.

Re:Just for some clarification…

By SouthSeb • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

Also, I think it’s valid to say:

- Brazil has a centralized federal electoral organization tied to its justice system, known as TSE (Superior Electoral Court).
- All voters have a unique voter ID with biometry.
- We have fully electronic voting machines that run Linux and an open source voting system that gets constantly scrutinized by civil and parties organizations.
- The voting machines are not connected to the internet during voting.
- When voting ends, the machines are sealed and transported to local TSE’s rooms, where they’re connected to it’s central server which then counts and sums all the votes.
- Around 150 million votes are counted in under 3 hours.

Re:From what I can see…

By Epeeist • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

“Gee gosh golly wiz. None of us can explain how the guy losing handily suddenly magically won the election during the historically unprecedented two hour extension that his own personal defense attorney gave him. Isn’t democracy just so inexplicable sometimes?”

You know, if you had looked at media outlets such as ABC News you would have found that both candidates teams asked for extensions.

Microsoft Announces Open Source Tool Evaluating Your Software’s Optimization For AI Coding Agents

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
The problem? Understanding how AI coding agents interact with the software you build. “Whether you’re maintaining an SDK, building a command-line interface, or publishing an MCP server or skills… you need to understand whether agents can discover and use what you ship, and what your team can change.”

Results can vary, and configurations keep changing, with behaviors influenced by everything from custom instructions and MCP servers to skills and plugins. So after a year of development Microsoft has created Scope, “an open-source platform built on Kubernetes for turning those interactions into evidence product teams can act on.”

Details are available on… the Microsoft open source blog:
Available under the MIT License, Scope supports a continuous Developer Agent Experience (DevAx) learning loop grounded in repeatable experiments.

The Azure Cosmos DB team’s experience shows what that loop can deliver… “The evaluations led to 20 Agent Kit issues and 27 documentation issues resolved,” [says Jay Gordon, Senior Program Manager, Azure Cosmos DB]… These results connect evaluation to decisions a product team can make: which documentation needs clarification, where tooling needs a fix, and whether an update changes agent behavior.... [The gains] demonstrate how targeted changes, informed by observed behavior, can improve the way agents use a product.

For more on the shift from building for human developers to supporting agents, watch Your Product Was Built for Humans. Is It Ready for Agents? or join us at AI DevCon NYC conference in November.
Scope surfaces everything from incorrect assumptions in documentation (or recurring missed instructions) to whether agents select the intended SDK, initialize it correctly, and use its APIs, leading to clearer descriptions for command-line tool and more actionable errors.

Microsoft’s open source blog also explains why AI agent evaluation needs an open-source foundation:
The challenges behind agent experience aren’t unique to one product or organization. SDK maintainers, tool authors, researchers, and agent developers are all asking how agents behave and what helps them succeed. No single team can represent every language, workflow, or integration. An open project can bring more scenarios, more failure cases, and more viewpoints into the evaluation process… Opening Scope’s execution and evaluation code gives contributors a way to question the methods, investigate unexpected results, and improve the evaluation itself. A shared foundation also reduces duplicated infrastructure. Agent integrations, reusable criteria, and trace-analysis improvements can help other teams study their own products without rebuilding the same machinery. The goal isn’t one universal benchmark or definition of success. It’s a common starting point that teams can adapt to their needs.

The MIT License lets teams use and extend Scope, while self-managed deployments let them evaluate private workloads without publishing their code or run data.... Scope streams activity as the agent works and retains interactions and workspace snapshots for later review. Your team can follow tool calls, inspect generated files, and connect a failed requirement to the steps that preceded it. Those traces provide observable evidence of what the agent did, helping turn a failure into a concrete documentation, SDK, or tooling improvement.

Not the problem in my mind

By paul_engr • • Score: 3 • Thread
Fuck agents and fuck AI and fuck microslop for being a pile of shit

translation

By diffract • • Score: 3 • Thread
we built slop to evaluate the slop. it’s slop all the way down

oh dear…

By Tom • • Score: 3 • Thread

Mickeysoft lost the plot again.

The game-changing element of LLMs and agents is that they have a non-computer-language interface - you can talk to them in plain English (or Chinese or whatever). This makes complex computer interactions available to a much wider audience than any previous computing invention. Adapting humans to the AI is getting that backwards. It’s a sign you don’t understand the first thing about why AI is so widely successful.

I predict this will be an abject failure and a year from now will quietly be pushed to the very back of the bottom-most drawer, never to be spoken off again (though it is getting crowded in there for M$).

Meanwhile, in the real world, everyone I’ve talked to about these things already has a skills file to teach the AI about their personal coding style. This is what actual humans came up with, independently several times, and it works: Adapt the AI to you. Plus we’ve been writing coding style guides for humans for a long time now, we’ve got plenty of experience doing that at least somewhat right.

25% of Incoming Pull Requests May Be AI Slop, Finds Study From Linux Foundation Research

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
“59% of maintainers report growing contribution volume since the rise of GenAI,” according to a new study published by Linux Foundation Research. But 25% of their incoming pull requests “are estimated to be low-quality, also known as ‘AI slop’.” And on large projects, 69% see growing contributions — and estimate that 31% are low-quality/AI slop.

So what do these results show us? “Generative AI is fundamentally changing how people participate in open source,” says the head of Open Source Ecosystem Development at Huawei’s R&D subsidiary Futurewei, which helped support the study. Specifically GenAI is “lowering barriers to contribution” but also “creating new challenges” for maintainers and communities. Their recommendation? “Build the governance, transparency and trust mechanisms that allow AI-assisted contributions to strengthen, but not overwhelm, the open source ecosystem.”

“Open source projects need to design for a growing AI-generated contributor base, not simply react to it,” said Hilary Carter, SVP of Research at the Linux Foundation. “That means setting clear expectations for GenAI, putting responsibility for testing and disclosure on contributors and giving maintainers better tools to manage incoming pull requests. If we get those fundamentals right, AI can expand participation without overburdening and increasing costs for maintainers.”

More from the blog It’s FOSS:
LF Research is the Linux Foundation’s research arm. It was set up in 2021 and publishes studies on how open source is built and used, drawing on surveys and project data. Its latest report, Navigating Open Source Software Development in the Generative AI Era, surveyed 234 contributors and maintainers on how generative AI is affecting the way open source gets made…

64% say reviews now take longer. Burnout is their top concern at 63%, narrowly ahead of contribution quality at 60%.

You will also find that policies have not caught up to the AI-assisted coding and vulnerability reporting trend. Of the 119 respondents who answered the question, 35% said their project has a formal policy permitting AI use. Another 32% have none and no plans for one, 23% plan to write one, and 10% ban AI contributions outright....

Most maintainers (71%) say AI makes it easier for newcomers to start contributing.
Other interesting findings:

OpenSSF and LF AI & Data also helped support the study.


nonsensical

By timeOday • • Score: 3, Interesting • Thread
“may be AI slop” is a nonsensical statement, because if it’s slop it doesn’t matter who wrote it. Whether AI did the coding is not really relevant, although it is a more objective claim.

When you can’t be bothered to to write something..

By BitterEpic • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
When you can’t be bothered to to write something…why should anyone be bothered to read it? We have some idiots doing that right now with AI here on Slashdot.

Licensing barrier

By LainTouko • • Score: 3 • Thread
“If this contains the output of any LLM, provide a full list of the licenses of everything in its training material so we can check compatibility with our license.”

Re:nonsensical

By martin-boundary • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread
AI slop is a completely different kind of slop from bad human programming. You can’t mix up AI slop and bad human programming into one single category. That’s an oversimplification which hinders intelligent discussion.

Re:Dipshits, it’s still a bug if AI finds it

By karmawarrior • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

If you’re overloaded with slop bug reports - that is, bullshit bug reports that aren’t a bug in your program but are the results of genAI users simply believing the output of Claude and shoving it into a ticket so they can pretend they contributed - you might have a very different view on this.

Slop is slop. If genAI was producing high quality output that’s usable we wouldn’t call it that.

Systemd Merges Support for Rust Programs

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
“As of today in systemd Git it’s now possible for the systemd programs to be written in the Rust programming language as an alternative to C,” reports Phoronix:
Core systemd code like the systemd library doesn’t yet support Rust code, but for the various systemd programs / leaf components there is now support for using Rust… The new systemd-keyring-setup utility in Rust is used for provisioning keyrings and enrolling X.509 certificates into the kernel’s dm-verity / fs-verity / BPF keyrings during the boot process while dealing them afterward. This systemd-keyring-setup code hasn’t been merged yet but is expected soon now that the Rust infrastructure has landed. Originally it was all part of a single big commit before being split-up for the Rust enablement, systemd-keyring-setup, and other preparations for this new component.

Systemd developers aren’t planning on porting existing C code to Rust, all the Rust code is built with Meson [no Cargo usage], and C linkage only is mandated.

Systemd Rust components come out slightly larger than C with a test program being 32KB compared to 20KB for its C twin. For now at least the systemd Rust support is optional and toggled by the -Drust= Meson option with it being auto by default.

Re:This will certainly be great discussion

By fuzzyfuzzyfungus • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread
I’m not really qualified to deliver a good holy war; but it does seem like there may be something to the criticism that monolithic integration has gone a bit far if supporting one utility being written in a different language is a special feature rather than a matter of the rest of the system not knowing or caring what is on the opposite side of an interface so long as it can act as expected.

Re:This will certainly be great discussion

By fluffernutter • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread
Then why are all the separate little config files monolithic? What cron did with one file you now need many multilinr files for? And what is the format of those config files anyway? It seems like INI which is a Windows thing. The only software that uses that on Linux was made by people who don’t really understand Linux.

AI Use Convinces California Math Professor There’s ‘No Point’ Grading Homework

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
From the student newspaper at the University of California, Berkeley:
Richard Borcherds, a UC Berkeley professor and Fields medalist, no longer grades his students’ homework. After seeing how many of his students used AI to consistently receive top scores, he felt there was “no point” in paying readers to grade for correctness in homework, as AI use is now unavoidable.

Borcherds revealed this in a sit-down interview Tuesday, following OpenAI’s announcement that AI agents apparently solved one of mathematics’ most difficult unsolved problems, the Navier-Stokes existence and smoothness problem. “If AI continues to improve at present rate, then, in a few years, there’ll be nothing human mathematicians can do that AI can’t do better,” Borcherds said.

Borcherds said he currently grades on completion if a student hands in their homework. He admitted that it is “not a very good system,” but at the moment, he has no alternative… Campus has tried several AI detection tools, including Turnitin and Rumi, but have determined that these tools aren’t adequate enough to be standardized on campus.
The article points out that at the university, each class’s AI policy “is up to the discretion of faculty.”

“That’s not intelligence!”

By timeOday • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
“in a few years, there’ll be nothing human mathematicians can do that AI can’t do better,” Borcherds said. " Oh, that’s sad. If history serves as a guide, it means we’ll have to re-define math as “not intellience (TM)" and rationalize that AI is just brute-forcing it since DNN’s are incapable of making novel generalizations (even though they do exactly that, constantly).

Let me fix this for you

By BitterEpic • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

Grading homework is kind of silly anyway. It should be for practice. Regular testing every week or so is the way to go while wearing your Meta glasses.

AI is a type of heroin that is very hard to stop once you start. Students once intoxicated will have a hard time stopping for “weekly tests.” They always eventually become unable to even reference primary sources, where the only truth is AI.

Do you read Sutter Cane?

Missing the point.

By thegarbz • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

In our math classes at university the homework was graded. Every week it was 30 questions, 10 points, for every mistake you lose a point.

Now here’s the rub: The answers were in the back of the book along with a complete worked solution. The point of the homework was practice, the point of grading was to make sure the practice was done in literally any form possible. Our math professor flat out said, even if you just go to the back of the book and copy the answer verbatim you’ll still be learning something.

Re:Let me fix this for you

By arglebargle_xiv • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
So the clanker told you that clankers are all just misunderstood beings/things?

Re:Good

By tlhIngan • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

When I was in university, homework was at most 10% of your grade. The midterm exam was often worth 45%, and the final the other 45%. Often with the stipulation that you must pass the final to pass the course.

I had classes where homework was assigned but not graded. It was obvious who did the homework and who didn’t - you just didn’t do very well on the final or midterm if you didn’t do the optional homework.

Everyone’s an adult. You don’t do the assigned homework at your own risk, even if it isn’t graded. Midterms and final exam correspond to the biggest influence on your grade.

Heck, sometimes the midterm mark can be dropped as well - I’ve had plenty of professors simply say because we scored badly on the midterms, they’ll use the final exam mark if we do better. So if you scored a 30% on the midterm but then get an 80% on the exam, you get an 80% on the class.

Stop the coddling and just treat everyone as an adult. Assign homework, but don’t mark it. You can ask if people had a problem they got stuck on so they could work it out as part of the lecture, but not part of the grade. The final grade you get depends solely on the midterm and/or the final exam.

(I got a D on a class where I didn’t do the homework. The second semester the followup course I did the homework and got an A-)

A Newly Proposed Linux Filesystem Can Fix Corrupted Data

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot
BeamFS creator Aurelien Desbrieres is not calling for a merge, but is requesting feedback on an 18-patch proposal that takes the place of FTRFS, an earlier filesystem he proposed in April.

The Linux/Open Source blog It’s FOSS reports:
Filesystems that can repair damage, like Btrfs and ZFS, usually do it by falling back on a spare copy of the data. BeamFS skips that and stores Reed-Solomon error-correcting codes inside every block. Every read gets checked against those codes, and small amounts of damage are corrected before the data reaches the application. If the filesystem can tell the damage is beyond repair, the read fails with an error instead of returning the wrong bytes…

In his technical report, ext4 and ext3 returned wrong data without any error, while Btrfs refused to read the file. BeamFS returned the correct file every time except once, when a flip hit a pointer to the file’s data and it refused the read.
“Aurelien says he used Anthropic’s Claude to write the code, the tool that checks the patches, and the cover letter…”

Re:The physics is measured, not supposed.

By MachineShedFred • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

Just because you don’t understand, doesn’t make it not true.

Cosmic radiation indeed causes higher storage failure rates in avionics systems. However, because we can do things like redundant storage, the problem usually isn’t in the file system, but the SSD firmware.

It’s incredibly common to replace an LRU (Line Replaceable Unit), take the SSD out of the replaced LRU and reflash the firmware on it, and reinstall and test to find out that the device works perfectly again because it was a bit-flip in the SSD controller firmware.

Source: I am an avionics engineer.

Why ?

By Bomazi • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
Linux already has dm-integrity, a layer that emulates a block device with per-sector tags that store integrity information. If you insert it between a block device and any filesystem, you get the same result, including a read error if the data cannot be corrected.

I don’t see an explanation of why you would need a whole new filesystem.

More info needed

By backslashdot • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

I refuse to adopt any Linux filesystem without proof of life evidence from the founder’s wife.

Not sure why OP thinks storage is corrupt

By Lady Galadriel • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread
Years ago I built a miniature PC to act as a media server and store master copies of scripts, help files and act as a print server. A year or so after I built it, I moved all the file systems to ZFS. However, with only an 1TB mSATA SSD and 2TB laptop HDD I could not Mirror everything. So I Mirrored the OS only. Then used ZFS to concat / stripe the remaining space for my media.

This worked reasonably well. A few times a year, I got a corrupted file in the media. Pretty straight forward to restore from backups. Not really a problem. Mostly video files because they are large, and would statistically be higher percentage of used space.

However, whence I implemented ZFS scrubs every 2 weeks, the corruption stopped, COLD. I have not had to restore any file, (due to on disk corruption), in over 6 years!!! And yes, I really mean that non-redundant media pool that has 2.1TBs used. My conclusion is that reading the used storage blocks caused the mSATA SSD & laptop HDD to find any marginal blocks. Then apply their internal ECC, before bad data could be supplied to ZFS.

Eventually I wrote about this here:
Arwen Star’s blog - Self correcting storage

Now do I believe this is a workable solution for production data?
Of course not. Any serious data need should have some form of Mirroring or RAID.

Nor do I believe this is something others should do…

Re:The physics is measured, not supposed.

By MachineShedFred • • Score: 4, Informative • Thread

That’s exactly the calculation. Use redundant storage in-flight, and make LRU swaps very quick on the ground. If you catch a failure in-flight, you have a tech with a replacement LRU waiting for the plane when it lands (for various values of “where” - obviously you don’t have techs at every airport).

It’s really not that different from anticipating disk failure in a server by having online redundancy, and a service callout to replace the part. Especially if you can quickly refurbish and recertify the LRU and put it right back into the replacement inventory.