Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. FreeBSD 16 Retires the Last of Its GPL Code
  2. OpenAI Launches a Keypad for AI Agents
  3. Stripe, Advent Offer to Buy PayPal For More Than $53 Billion
  4. Microsoft Patches a Record 570 Security Flaws
  5. Astronauts Take First X-Rays In Space
  6. House Votes For Permanent Daylight Saving Time
  7. Iran Abused Mobile Networks’ Vulnerabilities To Locate US Military In Middle East
  8. OpenAI’s First Device Will Be Moveable, Screenless Speaker Built as AI Companion
  9. Google Images Gets a Pinterest-Like Redesign Focused On Discovery
  10. Lawsuit Claims Meta’s Layoff Decisions Were Made By AI, Not Humans
  11. Google DeepMind Calls For US To Spearhead AI Standards Body
  12. Linux Foundation’s Latest Foray Is To Standardize Internet-Native Payments For AI Agents
  13. OnePlus Is Reportedly Shutting Down In the US, Europe
  14. IBM Stock Collapses After a Grave Warning About AI
  15. New York Becomes First State To Impose Data Center Moratorium

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

FreeBSD 16 Retires the Last of Its GPL Code

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
FreeBSD 16 has removed the last GPL-licensed code from its base system, retiring the old GNU ‘dialog’ implementation after the installer moved to ‘bsddialog’ and the final dependency was disabled. Phoronix reports:
This ticket to retire dialog was opened back in February while is now merged to the FreeBSD source tree for what will become FreeBSD 16.0. With dialog removed, the latest FreeBSD code now retires the GNU sub-tree of the FreeBSD base system now that no more GNU code remains. FreeBSD 16.0 is working its way toward release that is expected to happen in December 2027.

OpenAI Launches a Keypad for AI Agents

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
OpenAI’s first hardware device is a limited-edition desktop keypad called the Codex Micro that lets users monitor and control AI coding agents. Axios reports:
Codex Micro is a collaboration with Work Louder, a boutique hardware company known for customizable mechanical keyboards and shortcut controllers for developers and designers. The small, square macro pad — with backlit keys, a rotary knob and a tiny joystick — sits beside your regular keyboard as a physical shortcut box for common Codex actions and shows the status of your agents. The keys are customizable and include a push-to-talk option as well as a dial to adjust your reasoning setting. Codex Micro is a niche device for Codex power users and will only be available until it sells out. It’s priced at $230.

WTF?

By CEC-P • Score: 4, Informative Thread
I already have one of these. It’s called my keyboard. And I know where all the keys are to control anything in any UI without even looking down. And it was $18 not $230.

Stripe, Advent Offer to Buy PayPal For More Than $53 Billion

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Stripe and private equity firm Advent International have reportedly made a joint $60.50-per-share offer to buy PayPal, valuing the payments company at more than $53 billion. The bid is said to represent a 28% premium to PayPal’s latest closing price and is backed by roughly $50 billion in committed bank financing.

private equity firm

By Anonymous Coward • Score: 3, Insightful Thread

You thought PayPal was shitty now? Come back in one year.

Nothing ever gets better

By MpVpRb • Score: 3 Thread

…when companies are acquired.
Paypal sucked before, expect it to get worse.

Microsoft Patches a Record 570 Security Flaws

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Krebs on Security:
Microsoft today released software updates to plug at least 570 security holes in its Windows operating systems and other software, almost triple the number of vulnerabilities the software giant fixed in its record-smashing Patch Tuesday release last month. Microsoft attributed the burgeoning patch counts to vulnerability discoveries aided by artificial intelligence. Nearly 60 of the bugs quashed in July’s Patch Tuesday earned a “critical” severity rating, meaning miscreants or malware could use them to seize remote control over a Windows device with little or no help from the user. Microsoft also addressed three zero-day flaws, including two that are already being exploited in the wild.

Two of the zero-day weaknesses allow an attacker to elevate their user rights on a Windows system, as do approximately 250 other elevation of privilege flaws fixed this month; they include CVE-2026-56155 - an Active Directory Federation Services bug — and CVE-2026-56164, a Microsoft Sharepoint vulnerability. CVE-2026-50661 is a security feature bypass in Windows BitLocker that could allow attackers to gain access to encrypted data if they have physical access to the device. Microsoft said this bug has been detailed publicly, but that it is not aware of any active exploitation.

In a blog post on July 9, Microsoft Executive Vice President Pavan Davuluri wrote that Windows users will notice “a higher volume of security updates included in each security release” as a result of AI aiding in the discovery of vulnerabilities. “The pace of vulnerability discovery is changing with advances in AI making it possible to find more issues, faster, across more code, with new mechanisms that can accelerate both discovery and analysis,” Davuluri wrote.

An AMAZING number of flaws

By Futurepower(R) • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
The big underlying issue is why does Microsoft deliver software with so many flaws?

Microsoft says 622

By schwit1 • Score: 3 Thread

https://msrc.microsoft.com/upd…

“If people want a severity hook, July has 26 vulnerabilities with a CVSS base score above 9.0, and 13 of those sit at 9.8,” said Josh Taylor, lead cybersecurity analyst at Fortra

Re:An AMAZING number of flaws

By AmiMoJo • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

It doesn’t, they just turned AI on it for the first time.

Linux is going through the same thing, only with less good AI and more slowly.

Right once, patch away

By Z80a • Score: 3 Thread

To find a security flaw, you only need to be right once.
So if you have a machine that has a shitload of false positives, and have a way to filter em quickly, you end up with a bunch of true positives.
Now to code, you ideally want to always be right, which is not quite ideal for a machine that does a lot of false positives.
It’s a pretty fun scenario, specially if you’re not the only one running the security flaw finding machine.

Astronauts Take First X-Rays In Space

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Astronauts on SpaceX’s Fram2 mission successfully captured diagnostic X-ray images in orbit for the first time. The milestone gives space medicine a second imaging option beyond ultrasound and could help future crews diagnose injuries, inspect equipment, and support longer missions to the moon or beyond. Popular Science reports:
Commercial off-the-shelf X-ray machines like the ice cooler-sized MinXray TR90BH now allow users to perform scans on subjects far away from traditional facilities. In 2022, [Mayo Clinic researcher Sheyna Gifford] assisted in preparing a crew to successfully generate digital X-rays while experiencing microgravity during a parabolic flight. Gifford’s team then spent years collaborating with SpaceX to plan another feasibility study. This time, they didn’t want to operate an X-ray machine aboard an aircraft simulating the conditions in space — they intended to use the equipment during an orbital mission.

The process was detailed in a recently published study in the journal Radiology, and focuses on last year’s Fram2 mission. Instead of days of medical training, astronauts spent only four hours learning how to use their portable radiography device. They then took preflight X-rays of a hand, forearm, chest, abdomen, and pelvis ahead of their SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket launch on March 31, 2025. Once in orbit, the team calibrated the system before testing their MinXray on the same body parts as well as a smartwatch.

Once the crew returned, a trio of independent radiologists reviewed the orbital X-ray images based on their positioning, spatial and contrast resolutions, and general scan quality. Although positioning scores were slightly decreased for the central body images, every other scan held up to similar examples created on Earth. Meanwhile, the astronauts reported that using the machine was easy despite minimal prior coaching. Looking ahead, researchers hope to conduct further X-ray tests during orbital missions, while continuing to reduce the overall size of equipment.

Dosage

By necro81 • Score: 5, Informative Thread
Medical x-ray equipment these days requires less radiation exposure than in years past. Still, it is a radiation dose on top of what space crews are already experiencing. NASA guidelines limit astronauts to 600 millisieverts (mSv) for their whole flight career, and 250 mSv for an acute event (e.g., a solar storm). They estimate a 6-month stay on the ISS could be 77-86 mSv, depending on solar conditions. By comparison, living on the surface of the Earth will dose about 3 mSv/yr.

A typical chest x-ray is about 0.1 mSv. So not nothing, but also not a huge amount, even if they did 10 images in quick succession. And weighed against the medical diagnostic benefit, it’s probably a decent tradeoff.

Re:Captain Dabbin.

By sg_oneill • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Its space. When it comes to radiation, an X-Ray machine is by far the least of their worries. Astronauts come back from space missions utterly glowing with radiation.

Admittedly the cancer rate amongst astronauts isnt THAT much higher (just under 1/3 of astronaut deaths compared to just over 1/5th of the general population), but this is also a cohort that have mostly been non smoking tea-totaller health conscious non-junk-eating people so its definitely a thing.

Like yeah, over exposure to medical X-Rays is totally a risk factor, but astronauts go into space knowing that space is actively trying to radiate them, freeze them, burn them, pop their lungs, boil their blood and suffocate them. Its a soldiers gambit really.

Re:Why is this a big deal?

By SouthSeb • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Because you need sufficient space and to be very still while x-raying. Also, space ships and stations get a much higher amount of external radiation than Earth (like, 20x more) and they needed to make sure it wouldn’t interfere with the scans.

House Votes For Permanent Daylight Saving Time

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
The House voted 308-117 to pass the Sunshine Protection Act, which would make daylight saving time permanent nationwide and end the twice-yearly clock change. The bill faces an uncertain future in the Senate, “where one G.O.P. leader said it was unclear whether it could move ahead and at least one Republican appears inclined to try to block it,” reports The New York Times. Some sleep experts oppose permanent daylight saving time, arguing that year-round standard time better aligns with circadian rhythms and winter morning safety. The New York Times reports:
President Trump has championed the effort to save an extra hour of daylight before nightfall and make the time zone permanent, describing the ritual of moving clocks forward in the spring and back in the fall a “ridiculous, twice yearly production.” “We are going with the far more popular alternative, Saving Daylight, which gives you a longer, brighter Day,” Mr. Trump wrote in a social media post in May. “And who can be against that.”

A sizable bloc of Florida Republicans in Congress is leading the charge on legislation that would do just that, mandating daylight saving time nationwide for the entire year. Representative Vern Buchanan of the Tampa Bay area is backing the bill, and Representative Anna Paulina Luna, another Tampa Bay-area Republican, cosponsored it. House leaders agreed to allow a vote on the measure this week as a sweetener for Ms. Luna in their efforts to persuade her to lift a legislative blockade she had maintained as she sought to force Senate action on a voting restriction bill Mr. Trump has championed.

Wait!

By Ol Olsoc • Score: 5, Funny Thread
This 1 hour Daylight Savings time is a pitiful excuse and example of liberal claptrap! We need to have our leaders take the real vote. As the Trump flags tell us NO MORE BULLSHIT we deserve nothing less than 24 hour daylight. We are in a new age of perfect governance, and we can force the sun to stop taking the night off. 24 7/365 sunshine across the earth in all places.

We have the political will, we have the military might, make it happen. Nuke the sun if it doesn’t comply/

Re:They should do the same in The Netherlands

By ShadowRangerRIT • Score: 5, Informative Thread
America tried this under Nixon. And reacted exactly as you’re predicting; it was instituted in January 1974, and rescinded within the year. Turns out, if nothing else, parents hate elementary school students walking to school or waiting for buses in pitch black at the coldest time of day.

Re:They should do the same in The Netherlands

By eth1 • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

If the Netherlands did this, they would reverse it immediately after the first winter. Not getting any sunlight until past 10.00 AM is so annoying, and the cost of road maintenance because rush hours is when everywhere, there is still ice on the roads, will be prohibitive.

People complaining have simply no clue how it is to have DST in the winter, and can’t imagine.

Sunlight in the morning is relatively useless: most people are waking up, getting ready for work, and going to work, all of which can be done with artificial light.

Sunlight in the evening is valuable: people get off work and need to work in their yards, kids have after-school sports/activities, etc. outside, which are all either easier or only possible with sunlight.

Re:They should do the same in The Netherlands

By HiThere • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

You’re being silly. If the time is stable, then you’ll set your hours to what it is. There’s nothing special about the time number “10:00 AM”. Businesses could have summer and winter hours if they chose to…at one time that wasn’t uncommon.

Scientific evidence says Standard Time is better

By dskoll • Score: 5, Informative Thread

All the evidence suggests that it’s better for our health to stay on Standard Time rather than Daylight Saving time, and sleep experts agree.

But I guess scientific evidence hasn’t meant anything to politicians for quite some time now.

Iran Abused Mobile Networks’ Vulnerabilities To Locate US Military In Middle East

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from TechCrunch:
The Iranian government abused well-known vulnerabilities in the global telecoms infrastructure to locate U.S. military personnel in the build-up to the Iran War, as well as in the early days of the conflict, according to Financial Times. The Iranian government exploited Signaling System 7, or SS7, a set of protocols for 2G and 3G networks that has long been the backbone of how cellular networks connect to each other to route subscribers’ calls and texts around the world, the newspaper reported, citing research by the Mobile Surveillance Monitor, as well as anonymous government officials with knowledge of the spy campaign.

Intelligence agencies have long abused SS7 to track cellphones abroad, which is what happened in this campaign. Using this technique, Iran was reportedly able to locate U.S. military forces stationed in military bases as well as hotels in Iraq, Bahrain, and other countries in the Middle East, which allowed the regime to strike them. These attacks resulted in several injuries. Apart from SS7, Iran also abused advertising technology used to serve tailored ads to cellphone users, another well-known surveillance technique that relies on everyday technology.

DJT, stuck in a war of his own making

By Epeeist • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Both Putin and Trump have started wars that they cannot win, and from which they cannot withdraw without an enormous loss of face.

The only difference is that Putin’s war only effects Russia’s economy, while Trump’s war effects the whole world.

Re:DJT, stuck in a war of his own making

By sit1963nz • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
More so the USA long term as more of the world financially decouples from the USA.
And even when the fat man has fallen off his perch things will not “go back to how they used to be” , the world has already decided it will never been under control of the USA again.

That is called “being competent”....

By gweihir • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

An enemy in a war does not “abuse” your weaknesses. They are “using” them if they are competent. And on the other side? Simple: Having these vulnerabilities is stupid. But the whole war is excessively stupid on the US side. Not the most stupid war ever fought, but probably up in the all-time top-10. And to think the only reason for that war is that a multiple-felon president needs to hide how he raped children.

Sigh.

By ledow • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I’ll say it again:

Active military personnel carrying around standard mobile phones is such a breach of all kinds of basic security protocols that it should be illegal.

But can’t let the troops get bored, eh? Have to let them do their fitbit on board your cruiser that you’re trying to keep secret, and have them checking into Facebook while they’re in Helmand province, and giving away their movements when they’re running around your bases at home, and having an always-on device capable of tracking and recording everything from audio to the radiowaves to location, made by the Chinese, wherever they go.

Dumbest fucking idea ever.

Re:Code is law.

By AleRunner • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

If the code allows it, it’s not abuse.

That’s actually pretty much a fair comment. A number of the mobile systems were originally designed to be more secure than they were finally delivered. GSM in particular. These systems then had security removed from them and monitoring added in during standardization according to American (and later European and other) requests. Probably what Iran has done to kill American soldiers are things that could have been eliminated from the mobile communication standards if the security agencies had been putting a priority on protecting us over spying.

This is a key reminder for us that when NSA and GCHQ demand that the security of systems is weakened they are doing the opposite of their jobs. They are endangering both American and British military people alongside also endangering civilians and allied military people worldwide. They are taking time from experts who should be spending it looking for vulnerabilities and building more secure systems. They are using that time to introduce weaknesses, for example getting rid of end to end encryption and adding in global identifiers, which also make the job of securing the system much more complex.

This isn’t just an American problem. Europe’s new Chat Control 2.0 is the same idea. There are pre-image attacks where you can make child porn which matches the image-hash of the material you want to track. Russia and Iran will be able to use those pre-image attacks to track people who have their secret materials.

Calling this “abuse” is misleading. It’s just Iran using weaknesses that our security services left in the systems, wanting to be able to use themselves and which Iran then discovered.

OpenAI’s First Device Will Be Moveable, Screenless Speaker Built as AI Companion

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
OpenAI is reportedly developing a screen-free, portable smart speaker meant to act as a personalized home computer and humanlike AI companion. “It will help control smart-home appliances, play media, answer questions, respond to messages and tap into the range of capabilities offered by OpenAI’s ChatGPT,” reports Bloomberg, citing people familiar with the matter. The device, expected to be unveiled this year and released in 2027, would mark OpenAI’s first major hardware push after acquiring Jony Ive’s io Products. Bloomberg reports:
Apple sued OpenAI last week, accusing the company of stealing trade secrets. But OpenAI believes that the device veers significantly from anything Apple has on the market today and that it’s unlikely that it violates trade secrets belonging to the iPhone maker, the people said. OpenAI’s success in hardware will hinge on bringing a novel approach to the market — something it aims to do with the smart speaker. For instance, the device’s technology is meant to become increasingly personalized and proactive as it gains a deeper understanding of its owner over time, according to the people.

OpenAI envisions the device anticipating needs, surfacing information proactively and serving as an expert on its user, they said. Though the speaker is designed to stay in the home, it will be easy to move around the house. OpenAI believes the product’s defining feature will be its personality and ability to connect on a humanlike level with users. The speaker incorporates mechanical elements that can move on their own, creating a sense that it is alive and not just an object responding to commands. The machine also will draw on personal information such as emails to better understand its owner. The goal is for the device to feel like a companion and become a physical manifestation of OpenAI’s ChatGPT. Still, the exact plans could change as the company works through the development and legal process.

The device’s communication abilities will rely on a more advanced version of the ChatGPT Voice Mode — GPT-Live — that OpenAI rolled out this month. The new voice mode is designed to act more like a human. It can listen and talk at the same time, adapt more naturally during conversations, and quickly process information. Though the new product resembles a speaker, OpenAI internally describes it as the first of its kind: a computer built for AI to help make busy people more productive. It includes a camera and other sensors that help it understand a user’s surroundings and context, as well as advanced AI models beyond those available on conventional smart speakers. Another central difference is that the device includes a rechargeable battery, allowing it to be carried from room to room throughout the day. A user could bring it into the laundry room while doing chores, move it into the kitchen for cooking assistance, and later place it in a living room or bedroom to have it play music. It can also remain plugged into a single room if the customer chooses.

Not very “Innovative”

By Turkinolith • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Great, just what we needed. ANOTHER “Alexa” type of always listening speaker device.

Even if the features appealed…

By Junta • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Why would I want a device that deliberately handicaps itself by not bothering to have a screen?

Especially with how verbose AI responses are, I couldn’t imagine having to just wait for it to read out the information asked of it.

I don’t get the AI companies’ fascination with voice-only input and audio-only output. It’s a strict subset of what the device in people’s hands can already do. Further, every single product that has aimed for this has flopped and you would think they would get the hint by now…

Re:Not very “Innovative”

By 93 Escort Wagon • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Great, just what we needed. ANOTHER “Alexa” type of always listening speaker device.

* NOW with extra evil!! *

Sounds ghastly

By Jeremi • Score: 5, Funny Thread

OpenAI envisions the device anticipating needs, surfacing information proactively and serving as an expert on its user, they said.

Will it have a Genuine People Personality? Perhaps a cheerful and sunny disposition?

Re:what?

By Morromist • Score: 5, Funny Thread

I can kinda see what they’re thinking:

“we could make it a phone app but we want to sell a physical object, and if it was just a thing with a screen it might as well be an app, so we’ll make it a speaker, which could also be an app, but is sorta more divorced from the phone I guess. HEY get off our backs we don’t have any new ideas, we just need to keep building the possibility we may become a huge apple-like company by saying we’re developing this device WHICH WILL BE REVOLUTIONARY. Also old people don’t know how to use AI -or phones really- but they sure as hell know how to yell at smart speakers!”

Google Images Gets a Pinterest-Like Redesign Focused On Discovery

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Google Images is getting a Pinterest-like redesign that turns image search into a personalized discovery feed, with “For You” galleries, real-time updates, and collections for saving visual ideas. “Google is also adding a way for users to create AI images right in Search, as it celebrates 25 years since the debut of Google Images,” reports TechCrunch. From the report:
After navigating to the redesigned Google Images, users will see a “For You” gallery of images tailored to their interests and browsing history. Like Pinterest, the gallery is designed for continuous browsing, with Google saying it updates in real time with new images. As users browse, they can save ideas to their “collections,” which will appear as tabs above the main gallery of photos. For example, users can create collections for things like vacation outfit ideas, travel inspiration, and ways to design a reading nook, which they can come back to later.

[…] As for generating images directly in Search, Google says the feature is meant for moments when you have a highly specific idea for an image that doesn’t already exist online. Google is bringing image generation directly into AI Overviews on Search and will use its latest Nano Banana model to transform a text prompt into a custom visual. The feature can also help users reimagine spaces and visualize ideas, such as seeing what a room might look like painted red or what a dorm room with a coastal theme could look like.

Pinterest ruined Google’s image search

By SoCalChris • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

JFC, Pinterest absolutely ruined Google’s image search results years ago. Now they’re trying to emulate that?

Anybody have any better alternatives?

Wrong discovery

By devslash0 • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

The only discovery they should be focusing on is making it easier for me to find the exact image I’m looking for.

Oh boy

By paul_engr • Score: 3 Thread
I’m sure glad i changed search engines. What ever happened to “ok this works, dont fucking change it?”

Lawsuit Claims Meta’s Layoff Decisions Were Made By AI, Not Humans

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
A lawsuit from 26 Meta employees alleges the company used AI-driven scoring and monitoring systems to select workers for layoffs, disproportionately targeting employees with disabilities or those who had taken protected medical, family, pregnancy, or parental leave. “Meta did not assemble the termination list through the considered judgment of managers who knew the work. Instead, Meta used a constellation of internal artificial-intelligence systems — including a system referred to internally as ‘Metamate,’ employee-trained ‘second-brain’ agents, keystroke- and activity-monitoring data, AI-token-usage dashboards, and algorithmically assisted performance ranking and calibration — to score, rank, and select employees for inclusion on the list,” the lawsuit (PDF) said. Ars Technica reports:
Employees were allegedly graded, among other things, on how much they used Meta’s AI tools. “Meta’s internal dashboards classified employees by their stage of adoption of its artificial-intelligence tools, using categories such as ‘AI Native,’ ‘AI First,’ and ‘AI Enabled,’" the lawsuit said. The lawsuit is apparently “the first against a major U.S. company to challenge the alleged use of AI in conducting layoffs,” according to Reuters. The complaint alleges that Meta’s tools for monitoring employees did not account for differences caused by disabilities and protected leaves. “Those tools draw on inputs — performance ratings, calibration scores, productivity and output metrics, ‘AI-native’ ratings, and AI-token consumption — that, by design, cannot be accumulated by an employee who is on protected medical or family leave, or whose output is reduced by a disability,” the lawsuit said.

The lawsuit alleged that Meta management did not take steps to adjust scores for employees who took leave or who requested reasonable accommodations for disabilities. “Meta did not neutralize those inputs for protected leave; did not exclude protected-leave-takers or accommodation-seekers from the selection cohort; and did not pause the system for the individualized, leave- and accommodation-neutral review that the law requires,” the complaint alleged. “The result was that employees who took protected leaves were disproportionately selected for layoff, based on scoring that not only failed to account for their protected leaves, but in effect penalized the employees for exercising their legal rights to these leaves.” The 26 plaintiffs requested leaves or disability accommodations in the 24 months before being selected for layoffs, the lawsuit said. The layoffs are not yet finalized, but employees are scheduled to start losing their jobs on July 22, the lawsuit said.
“These claims lack merit and are not based on facts,” said Meta in a statement. “Workforce management and organizational decisions were and are made by people, not AI.”

So their AI was just Deloitte or PwC

By geek • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

This is exactly what companies like PwC come in and do. The AI just did it faster.

What goes around

By Himmy32 • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Working for a business that has captured, analyzed, and commoditized the personal data of the general public, then having those company algorithms come back to bite the workers who enabled the system is mildly poetic, but still a depressing step in the march to a dystopian future.

Whether Ai or not…

By flibbidyfloo • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
I think the Ai angle might be an unwelcome distraction from the case that could hurt the employees. If Meta can show they didn’t actually use Ai to make any decisions, but merely to assemble statistics that they could have gathered via traditional means, then the case loses credibility. If the employees can actually show that the layoffs disproportionately affected workers engaged in protected activities and those with disabilities, they’d probably have a good enough case, especially if those decisions were made by cold, calculating humans.

Re: Is it much different?

By sinkskinkshrieks • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Intel did something similar 20 years ago but inadvertently laid off the principal engineer for a major chip project that ended up costing them millions. Oops.

Re:Hard to see Meta Losing

By Dragonslicer • Score: 5, Informative Thread

The employees have to prove that their protected status was targeted to win, and that is a pretty tough sell IMO. It seems like the protected status was more of a side effect of “performance.”

Not at all. If they use a metric of “Worked at least X hours in the past 12 months”, and a person worked fewer than X hours because they were on parental leave, firing them would not be a “side effect of performance”, it would be a direct violation of their legal protection.

Google DeepMind Calls For US To Spearhead AI Standards Body

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Google DeepMind chief Demis Hassabis is calling for a U.S.-led AI standards body to review frontier models for national security risks such as cybersecurity and biological threats. His proposal would create a federally overseen public-private organization, initially voluntary and eventually mandatory for U.S. deployment. CNBC reports:
Google DeepMind boss Demis Hassabis, a Nobel laureate, said in an article posted on X on Tuesday that “urgent action” was needed to address risks associated with artificial general intelligence (AGI) — the point at which AI matches or surpasses human intelligence. “We’ve already seen the challenges frontier models pose for cybersecurity, and other threats including nuclear and bio risks may soon emerge as capabilities continue to advance,” he said.

[…] Hassabis said the U.S. was well positioned to lead in developing an AI framework “given its economic and technical standing.” “It could establish a new Standards Body modelled on a federally overseen public-private partnership or self-regulatory organisation, much like the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), with a board that includes independent leading technical experts and open-source representatives,” he added. FINRA regulates brokerage firms and exchange markets in the U.S.

The proposed body would need “substantial” funding “in order to attract world-class technical talent and provide the necessary compute resources for large-scale testing,” Hassabis said. Funding would “likely” come from industry, he added. Frontier labs would initially voluntarily share models with the body for review up to 30 days before release, before becoming mandatory for deployment in the U.S. market after being shown to be “effective.” “Specific agentic AI tests could look for attempts to bypass safety guardrails or signs of deception, and ensure best practices, such as digitally watermarking AI-generated images and generating human-readable output tokens to understand model reasoning,” Hassabis said.
Further reading: Over 200 Economists Say ‘We Must Act Now’ On AI’s Economic Impact

Re:Oh fuck right off

By nightflameauto • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Your shitty chat bot is not a national security risk.

This is about pulling up the ladder behind themselves. Create enough bureaucratic hurdles that new players can’t get a foot in the door and it’s a win for the already established players. They are either feeling like they’re doing good enough to make this effort worthwhile, or they see someone nipping at their heels that may get thrown off-course if they set up the correct set of barriers right now.

Either way, they’re calling for this during an administration that is known to drop any barrier for someone or some company willing to praise the man in the White House, or throw some gifts at him, or outright bribe him. So AI will become an even more outright rich man’s game. And onward we spiral. You’d think the toilet would finish its flush at some point, but thus far we’re still teetering on the edge.

Demis Hassabis is a scientist

By oumuamua • Score: 3 Thread
He is the real deal and doesn’t do marketing bullshit. These researchers are seeing the models a good 6 months before you get them AND they seem them before they are dumbed down with safety restrictions. Someone should probably submit this new paper in the submissions que: From AGI to ASI https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.126…
It means we already have AGI and are moving beyond it.

Re: Demis Hassabis is a scientist

By liqu1d • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
They’ve been saying this shit for years now though. It’s always 6 months away we promise, then another 6 months then another. I’m not saying this guy is full of shit but I’m sure many would be happy to say anything to keep such income.

Re:oh look

By cusco • Score: 4, Informative Thread

They’re desperately trying to keep the Chinese models out, but I doubt they’ll be successful. Chinese AI is mostly outcome-based, they train a bot to wash dishes, a drone to recognize an insect infestation, or mining machinery to find and follow a vein, and equipment purchased from China is going to come with their AI baked in. Sure, they’ll play with chatbots and AGI, but most of their work is devoted to actually accomplishing something besides stock manipulation. Once Chinese AI is seeded throughout the economy in machinery and devices more advanced systems are going to follow.

What happens when

By sit1963nz • Score: 3 Thread
The rest of the world says “No” to the USA and its demand for control.

96% of the worlds population does not live in the USA, and I can see no good reason to let the 4% run by a pedo dictate anything to anyone.
The US is firmly US first and US only and no treaty seems to survive a ketchup involved temper tantrum , so why try.

Linux Foundation’s Latest Foray Is To Standardize Internet-Native Payments For AI Agents

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Today, the Linux Foundation launched the x402 Foundation to standardize internet-native payments for AI agents, APIs, and applications, based on Coinbase’s contributed x402 protocol. Backed by companies including AWS, American Express, Cloudflare, Google, Mastercard, Stripe, and Visa, the effort aims to make payments work directly over HTTP (assuming users are comfortable letting AI agents handle financial transactions).

“The whole idea is to give agents access to money and, through that financial independence, improve their set of capabilities to pretty much anything on the internet,” Lincoln Murr, Coinbase’s AI product lead, told CNBC last month when the company announced the protocol. “In the 2010s, every internet company dealt with the transition from desktop and web into a mobile environment. And now in the late 2020s, we’re seeing the exact same thing happen where agents are going to be the new primary economic actors on the internet.”

I have an idea

By CEC-P • Score: 3 Thread
Name it Copyright Violation Coin and put it on the blockchain! Btw, AI agents are the most gullible things I have ever seen, except the scrapers that grab the data are even worse. Not only do they suffer from nonstop version confusion, quoting 5 different steps to fix an HP printer from 5 different generations that had 5 different menu structures, but they’re susceptible to “ai tar pit traps.” Now imagine it’s one you charge for. And per-page it has an AI generating fake-ish data for the other AI to scrape. This will not work!

Re:Reason AI agents want “access to money”

By Himmy32 • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

The future no one predicted is when Claude buys you lube paid in Crypto to delivered by Amazon drone when he sees you open your browser. It’s weird that with something like OpenClaw that something like this isn’t a joke anymore.

OnePlus Is Reportedly Shutting Down In the US, Europe

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
OnePlus will reportedly announce this week that it is shutting down its brand in the U.S. and Europe, following months of signs that parent company Oppo was winding down the brand’s global presence. India and China are reportedly unaffected, but it’s unclear whether Oppo will replace the brand directly in those markets. The move also raises questions about future support for existing OnePlus users. 9to5Google reports:
WinFuture reports that OnePlus is gearing up for an official withdrawal from the U.S. and European markets, with the announcement due in the “coming days” this week. Closed-door press conferences have apparently happened, with no details shared on the exact reason OnePlus as a brand is shutting down in these markets. India and China are, as far as this report claims, not affected. The report, citing “well-informed sources,” notes that this OnePlus announcement will come amid “fundamental changes” to Oppo’s strategy, but the big point here is the global death of OnePlus.

OnePlus is a Chinese smartphone manufacturer

By RobinH • Score: 5, Informative Thread
If, like me, you didn’t know who OnePlus was.

RAM costs

By alvinrod • Score: 3 Thread
I wonder if it’s the memory costs that did them in. They tended to make devices for the higher end of the market and putting 16 GB in a phone is going to be incredibly expensive for a company that can’t manufacture their own memory chips or drive enough volume to get discounts on purchases or preferred treatment from memory manufacturers.

I’m not an Android user, but the OnePlus 15 that they released last year was a good device that was well regarded. I know a lot of other posters here have had good things to say about them over the years as well. Hopefully they’re able to rebound from this and can continue offering great products.

Re:OnePlus is a Chinese smartphone manufacturer

By nashv • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

This isn’t a a judgement on you, but even in the US, Oneplus is a well known brand. The most prolific mobile phone reviewer MKBHD from the US, with 20 million + subscribers, has talked about it it for years.

You sir, are apparently living under a rock.

Re:OnePlus is a Chinese smartphone manufacturer

By MachineShedFred • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

They literally sold phones in the US for a decade or more, sometimes with better hardware than the “big boys” and not locking you out of bootloaders and 3rd party flashes but that’s ok.

I still have my OnePlus 9 Pro with the pop-up selfie cam and an actual full-screen front with no stupid notch or hole. Fantastic hardware. I look forward to it continuing to be useful under LineageOS for years to come.

So what are our options now?

By devslash0 • Score: 3 Thread

So what are sensible options left to us mortals now?

- iPhones are a very aquired taste.
- Samsungs are annoying bags of bloatware.
- Custom ROMs no longer pass SafetyNet reliably…

IBM Stock Collapses After a Grave Warning About AI

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
IBM shares plunged after the company warned that Q2 revenue and earnings would miss expectations, blaming customers’ sudden shift in spending toward AI hardware instead of software services. However, CEO Arvind Krishna did not place all the blame on IBM’s customers. The CEO also said it “faltered” by failing to “anticipate the magnitude of the capex reprioritization.”

“These conditions require our teams to execute perfectly, and this quarter we faltered. We did not adapt and move quickly enough, and numerous large deals failed to close on the timelines we expected, driving the majority of our shortfall.” Fast Company reports:
In the preliminary report, IBM said that for its second quarter of fiscal 2026, it expects revenue of $17.2 billion, which is up 1%. It also said it expects a Non-GAAP Diluted Earnings Per Share (EPS) of $2.93, up 5%. However, as noted by CNBC, these preliminary results are below what analysts were expecting, which was $17.86 billion in revenue, and an EPS of $3.01, according to FactSet data.

IBM’s answer will be: chop chop chop

By hwstar • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Layoffs are coming.

Historically this is what IBM has done in the past to improve profitability.

I view this current debacle as a failure on management’s part to see what might be coming up in the sector as emerging tech just like layoffs are a failure of management to properly size the company and select the proper roles which drive growth and ultimately profitability.

Will management pay with their heads? That ultimately depends on the board, and maybe the shareholders.

Re:good self awareness

By jd • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Good question. Their POWER series of CPUs were not insignificant in capability, their chip designers were clearly technically sophisticated, and GPUs are just specialised vector processors with a few extra bells and whistles - stuff IBM is extremely familiar with.

It would not have been difficult to release a GPU or other LLM-specific processor to go along with the POWER11. They’d been working on the POWER11 for 4 years, they knew in 2020 that LLMs had a strong potential to be significant for Big Data processing - an area you use big iron for, they’re not rank amateurs, they have plenty of reserve, they could have assembled an emergency team to build a vector processor that was custom-designed for just LLM work, and released an LLM processor card that could run circles around nVidia.

They didn’t. Because, as has happened before, their management is simply too stupid and too slow.

Re:The bullwhip effect on supply chains

By sjames • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

When is a hard question. Rationally it should never have blown up this much in the first place (some expansion would be rational, but not like we’ve seen). Clearly the minds driving this are not rational.

Insanity is notoriously hard to predict. That’s why short selling is so risky. The market can clearly remain irrational longer than most people can remain solvent when betting against it.

It’s temporary.

By supabeast! • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

IBM is still in fine shape. The company is not losing money. Revenue did not fall off a cliff like the stock price did. If they’re smart IBM can wait this out and quietly prepare for things to bounce back when the insane AI capex ends and people need something IBM is ready to provide. (But, realistically, IBM will just lay off 25,000 good people instead of putting human capital to good use as part of a long term strategy.)

Indian Bumbling Manipulators (IBM)

By JakFrost • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Any IBM project I’ve seen in the last two decades has been filled with outsourced Indian consultants that put in the hours warning their chairs and accomplish nothing only to be replaced by another bumbling Indian to do the same when there is no progress and complaints come in from management and new time extension contract needs to be signed for when time and materials exceed the estimated costs until the project fails.

IBM SameTime, Lotus Notes Mail server upgrades, Z/OS migrations, x390 upgrades, P-Series hardware refresh, TADDM CMDB inventory, BigFix patch management failures, and the list goes on. All IBM products and projects that I’ve had to help fix, implement, maintain until replacements can be installed and IBM garbage ripped out.

Teaching IBM mainframe consultants how to FTP files to their mainframe filesystem partitions to upgrade the z/OS shows how low that company is sunk after it moved to India since it fired all of their local US talent and mainframe guys.

Any project that IBM touches goes IBM Blue(TM) from asphyxiation and withers away and dies.

Now they are losing to AI on their inept services and software projects after failing to anticipate that is just par per course for their consulting business. Just as bad as Deloitte.

Microsoft is following on their heels now also, full of outsources and offshored Indians and people wonder why Windows 11 sucks so hard?!

The US techies are left scrambling for the few leftover IT jobs here to be taken over by AI after they implement the death knell for their back-office working bretherent. They are building their own AI terminators, first for the non techies who are the clerks and analysts, but then for themselves to snipe each other out of the few remaining jobs in the future maintaining the AI IT infrastructure.

New York Becomes First State To Impose Data Center Moratorium

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot
New York has become the first U.S. state to impose a moratorium on large new data centers, pausing construction for one year over concerns that AI-driven data center growth is raising utility bills, straining water supplies, and burdening communities. “As data center development threatens to hike up utility bills, deplete our natural resources, and create uncertainty for New Yorkers, it’s my responsibility to take action and lead,” said New York Governor Kathy Hochul. She will also pursue legislation to repeal sales tax exemptions for large data centers, Hochul added. Reuters reports:
The construction ban will apply to data centers that use 50 megawatts or more of power, officials in the governor’s office said. During the moratorium, the state’s Department of Environmental Conservation will not issue any discretionary permits not already deemed complete, the governor’s office said. Instead, Hochul directed state officials to develop a Generic Environmental Impact Statement to ensure that new data centers coming online are held to “consistent standards,” as well as examine the potential environmental impacts of the construction and operation of data centers in the state. The ban will be lifted once the state finalizes those standards, according to Hochul’s office.

Curious

By Anonymous Coward • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

How charging EVs will break the power grid but operating gigawatt slop datacenters is essential?

Praise be

By SumDog • Score: 3, Interesting Thread
Despite electing a communist mayor in their largest city, it seems like the state government is making a solid good move here. We already have way more capacity than China. I high doubt any of the current model hosting providers are anywhere near capacity or have growth curves even approaching them. It’s all investment fraud and NY is doing the right thing to put a hard break on the newest Tulip Mania