Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Astronomers Find Biggest Super-Puff Planets Yet That Are Lighter Than Cotton Candy
  2. US Government Allows Anthropic Limited Release of ‘Mythos’ AI Model, Saying ‘Appropriate Safeguards are in Place”
  3. Microsoft Adds Another Year To Windows 10 Extended Update Program
  4. Airbus Is Ordered To Inspect 16 Jets After Cracks Are Found In Wings
  5. Notion Mail Is Shutting Down
  6. ‘Fingerprints’ of Black Hole’s Event Horizon Detected For First Time
  7. Spain To Require Carriers To Keep Mobile Networks Live During Power Outages
  8. Polestar Banned From Selling Cars In US From Model Year 2027
  9. Trump Administration Asks OpenAI To Stagger Release of New Model
  10. Linux Foundation Launches Akrites To Coordinate AI-Driven Open Source Security
  11. Apple Raises Prices On Macs, iPads, and More By Hundreds of Dollars
  12. LastPass Says Hackers Stole Customer Support Case Data During Klue Breach
  13. Anthropic Says Alibaba Must Be Punished For Largest Claude Cloning Attack
  14. Ford Rehires 350 Engineers After AI Fails To Preserve Expertise or Train Juniors
  15. Micron Locks In Historically High Memory Prices For Five Years

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Astronomers Find Biggest Super-Puff Planets Yet That Are Lighter Than Cotton Candy

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Astronomers have discovered two Jupiter-sized exoplanets with densities lower than cotton candy, making them the lightest known worlds of their size. The rare “super-puffs,” located about 1,110 light-years away, are likely composed mostly of hydrogen and helium, with follow-up observations by the James Webb Space Telescope expected to probe their atmospheres. The Associated Press reports:
[University of Oxford’s George Dransfield] suspects these fluffy, wispy worlds are probably white or blue, depending on whether the skies there are cloudy — no shades of cotton-candy pink. The planets are probably mostly hydrogen and helium, although it will take follow-up observations by NASA’s Webb Space Telescope to confirm their chemical makeup.

Detected by NASA’s Tess satellite over the past decade, these two especially puffy-puffs orbit a star in the southern constellation Volans, known as the flying fish. The researchers studied the planets’ orbits using telescopes on Earth to determine their density, from 1,110 light-years away. A light-year is nearly 6 trillion miles (9.7 trillion kilometers). Jupiter, by comparison, is as much as 35 times denser than these two lightweights.

Considered rare in the cosmos, super-puffs are thought to form around the disk of gas and dust around a newborn star where there is more gas than dust. They shed much of the material over time, stripping down even more. NASA’s tally of worlds outside our solar system currently stands at nearly 6,300 confirmed. Fewer than 40 are super-puffs, according to Dransfield.
The findings have been published in the journal Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

Super-Puffs?

By 93 Escort Wagon • Score: 3 Thread

Do they live by the super-sea, and frolic in the autumn mist in the land of super-honalee?

US Government Allows Anthropic Limited Release of ‘Mythos’ AI Model, Saying ‘Appropriate Safeguards are in Place”

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“The US government has allowed Anthropic to release its powerful Mythos AI model to select companies and organizations,” reports CNN, “revising license requirements after ordering an export block earlier this month in the wake of national security fears.”
Since the export ban earlier in June, “Anthropic has worked with the US government to address risks associated with the Covered Models,” Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick wrote to the company in a letter dated Friday. In light of progress in that work, Lutnick wrote, “I have determined that appropriate safeguards are in place to permit certain trusted partners to access the Claude Mythos 5 Model.”

The letter does not include permission for Anthropic to release Fable, a less powerful version of Mythos. “We received notice from the US government that Mythos 5, our strongest cybersecurity model, can be redeployed to a small group of cyber defenders and infrastructure providers,” Anthropic said in a statement…

Conversations between Anthropic and the government are expected to continue into the weekend, with an eye to restoring access to Fable, as well, a source familiar with the discussions told CNN.

Microsoft Adds Another Year To Windows 10 Extended Update Program

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Microsoft has quietly extended free Windows 10 security updates for consumers by another year, pushing the Extended Security Updates (ESU) program’s end date from October 12, 2026, to October 12, 2027. “The ESU support page was updated with that date, and Microsoft’s blog post on the program has a new editor’s note confirming the change,” reports Ars Technica. From the report:
The prevalence of Windows across so many devices and form factors has given Microsoft a massive customer base for decades, but it has also stymied the company’s efforts to roll out new operating systems. Microsoft famously extended the support window for Windows XP numerous times throughout the 2010s as it became apparent that millions of PCs would never be updated. Windows 10 isn’t quite as entrenched as XP was, but it has still been a slog getting people to upgrade to Windows 11 even nearly five years after release.

Unlike many past Windows updates, Windows 11 required some users to buy new PCs with specific CPU technologies and a Trusted Platform Module (TPM). Microsoft was widely criticized for excluding perfectly serviceable PCs, and that’s turning into a problem in 2026. The AI-driven shortage of storage and memory has made system upgrades vastly more expensive, potentially slowing upgrades. Some have also avoided Windows 11 due to Microsoft’s intense focus on AI features.

The result is that Windows 10 remains stubbornly popular. According to StatCounter data, Windows 10 is still running on about 26 percent of PCs, while Windows 11 sits at 72 percent. That means there are still hundreds of millions of active Windows 10 installs, but those machines will be up to date for at least an additional year.

Re:No good options here

By Murdoch5 • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
My father-in-law in this mid-70’s installed Linux Lite, which doesn’t use Wayland, and is small, fast, and just works. It’s fine to not like Wayland, or Flatpak, Snap, AppImage, System D, KDE, Gnome, etc… but with Linux, you get the choice of what you run, so it’s also a non-starter.

Windows is so unstable that rebooting or updating could cause the entire OS to corrupt itself, and then you can quickly become screwed, especially if it was doing a UEFI update and failed part way. There have been other reports of BitLocker activating itself, locking the drive, and then effectively nuking the drive after a UEFI update because it can’t understand SecureBoot.

This never really worked

By HnT • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

They allegedly offered certain customers options to extend the updates freely, but this absolutely never worked not even shortly before the first EOL last year. And in the last weeks leading up to the EOL they kept closing more and more options to freely and/or conveniently extend the EOL, to force everyone to win11.

Seriously, just F M$ and finally make the switch to Linux. There are many great and rock solid distros out there, and many options to easil run legacy windos software like wine and proton.
Absolutely nobody really needs win for anything anymore.

“Up to date”

By markdavis • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

>“That means there are still hundreds of millions of active Windows 10 installs, but those machines will be up to date for at least an additional year.”

And they could be up to date for many, many, many years if Linux was installed on those, instead. Then updates would be fast, easy, free, installed when and how you want, not suddenly change things you don’t want changed, not slow your machine down, and not require any “subscription” service or even a login. And then after those years shift from a “update” path to an “upgrade” path and have many years more.

I regularly use 10+ year old machines (some even much older) that work just as fine now under Linux as they did when first purchased. RAM use has increased a little, which is to be expected, but overall performance is just as good. The days of needing to upgrade hardware every few years to have a good experience are long gone.

Thank you Microsoft

By fleeped • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

for screwing your OS so badly and making me move to Linux, I’m far happier and I miss nothing, thanks to all the awesome software that is either native (Kate) or cross-platform (JetBrains) or is used as a bridge to windows software (Wine et al). The only thing you’re extending is your pointless hopes for recovery from this unparalled idiotic move to force people to 11.

Re:Even so…

By Bahbus • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Not Microsoft’s problem that manufacturers use shitty parts. TPMs have been included on all standard motherboards for over a decade.

Airbus Is Ordered To Inspect 16 Jets After Cracks Are Found In Wings

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
schwit1 shares a report from The Wall Street Journal:
The European Union Aviation Safety Agency has ordered (PDF) urgent inspections of 16 Airbus A380 planes operated by Emirates and Qantas, after cracks were found in a wing component on some aircraft (source paywalled; alternative source).. Cracks were found during earlier inspections of the wing spars structure, a key component of the wing, EASA said in a directive effective Wednesday. EASA determined that they “could reduce the structural integrity of the wing.”

“To address this potential unsafe condition, Airbus determined that an additional special detailed inspection has to be accomplished,” EASA said. The first group of five aircraft, operated by Emirates, need to be inspected immediately, while the second group of 11 aircraft can be inspected later but within 25 flight cycles, EASA said in a separate statement. From the second group, 10 are operated by Emirates and one by Qantas, the aviation safety agency said.

Re:Would a Spar be Repairable?

By PPH • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Possibly repairable with the application of doubler plates, depending on the extent of cracking. Replacing a wing spar may be uneconomical and result in the aircraft being written off. Such major structural repairs may be possible in other parts of an aircraft. But not so much the wings. The entire weight hangs from those.

Re:Would a Spar be Repairable?

By jd • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

As production has ended, if the A380 is genuinely necessary, then the economics shift somewhat. That doesn’t mean they CAN be replaced, from the sounds of it they can’t* (at least in many cases), but the inability to replace the aircraft would mean that options that aren’t rational become necessary.

*I have to be careful here. If the wing is designed to be the absolute minimum weight possible, then I don’t see how they could be without fully disassembling the entire wing and then reconstructing it from the ground up. And adhesives/welding might mean that just can’t be done. At all. On the other hand, there’s no obvious reason why you couldn’t design a wing to have far more structural support than actually needed AND make spars deliberately maintainable and replaceable. I don’t have an A380 handbook in front of me, so can’t say how Airbus approached this. But it seems improbable that they’re built to be swapped.

Re:Would a Spar be Repairable?

By dunkelfalke • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

The A380-800 wing is massively oversized because it has been designed for the even larger and heavier A380-900 that never went anywhere beyond Catia.

Re:“Emergency Airworthiness Directive”

By Petersko • Score: 5, Informative Thread

“It’s very important and cannot be skipped, but the danger is not imminent” is a perfectly reasonable classification for risk. You used the word “emergency”. They did not.

You would be amazed how many things continue to operate in this middle ground. Like an absurd number of bridges in the United States.

Re:a380 concorde

By ceoyoyo • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

The A380 is already out of production. The airlines that fly A380s really want more though. “Not economical” depends very much on what types of routes you fly and how much landing and takeoff slots cost at the airports you service.

Notion Mail Is Shutting Down

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Notion announced that it will shut down its email client on September 22. The company says more than half of users already manage email through Notion’s AI agents without opening their inbox, so it is shifting its focus from a traditional email client to agent-run workflows. Engadget reports:
It has published an FAQ for users to make sure that they don’t lose any messages or data in the transition. Most emails will still exist in a Gmail inbox, but customers will need to manually export their drafts, scheduled emails, snippets and auto label instructions.
Notion first began offering Notion Mail after acquiring startup Skiff in 2024.

Can’t Wrap My Head Around Notion

By SlashbotAgent • Score: 3 Thread

What is Notion? From their website they are all things to all people AND AI!!!!! But, I can’t wrap my head around what it actually is, with or without email.

Can anyone explain what it is and/or who its competitors are?

Re:Can’t Wrap My Head Around Notion

By SumDog • Score: 5, Informative Thread
It’s a wiki. It’s an ultra shitty clone of Confluence. We used it at my last company and it sucked ass. Some people use it for general note taking.

Who, and who?

By drinkypoo • Score: 5, Funny Thread

News for nobody. Stuff that doesn’t matter.

Nothing + Claude

By geek • Score: 3 Thread

Notion is really only valuable as a memory/brain for Claude these days. It actually excels at that when used properly. I was also annoyed by their gmail/calendar inetgration though. It really wanted to take over the inbox and tag things how it wanted. I just didn’t understand the point of it.

Re: Never heard of either Notion/Skiff

By Kiffer • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

This is a death spiral for a lot of software and services. “Only 45% of our users use this feature, so we can cut it. Only 15 percent use this feature so we can cut it.” Repeat a couple of times.
But, those features that might have seemed like niche features were the feature that those customers valued. So now, 45% of your users just stop being users. Yes-yes they probably used the other features too, but, they needed the feature that you cut, so they have to go else where to find it.
I’ve seen it over and over. Version 1 of software has 100 features. Version two, developed using Agile Methodologies, some witt sets the priorities for features such that any feature used by fewer than 25% of users is so low a priority that it never gets implemented. That’s enough features that every user uses at least a couple of them, in a non-overlapping mess of usage patterns.
Everyone is unhappy, management decides it’s because they didn’t have needed features and instead had a something that no one actually wanted, but became someone’s personal hill to die on in a planning meeting, and no one can tell him no. So they implement the feature, and 75% of users turn it off… so next update that “feature” can’t be turned off because someone went to bat so hard for it that they can’t cope with the idea that they should have just implemented the missing old features.
Got a bit ranty, don’t use Notion, but it sounds like whoever is in charge has notions.

‘Fingerprints’ of Black Hole’s Event Horizon Detected For First Time

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Researchers say they detected the first gravitational-wave “fingerprints” of a black hole’s event horizon by analyzing the final moments of the powerful GW250114 merger. The findings support Einstein’s general relativity and may eventually help probe frame dragging and quantum fluctuations near black holes. Phys.org reports:
For the new research published in Nature, an international team of researchers analyzed data from the strongest gravitational wave ever recorded, known as GW250114, detected by the LIGO observatory in January 2025. By isolating the last burst of waves — known as “direct waves” — from this black hole merger, the scientists said they were able to extract information from closer to an event horizon than ever before. “This black hole horizon concept normally appears in science fiction,” lead study author Sizheng Ma of the Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics in Canada told AFP. “But now we are really able to touch the region around the horizon with gravitational data,” he added. “Sometimes I cannot believe this is really happening.”

The last stage of two black holes merging is like a spoon stirring a glass of water, Ma explained. The resulting swirl in space creates the ripple of gravitational waves that travel at the speed of light in all directions. If the metaphorical spoon is stirring close enough to the black hole’s event horizon, “this offers us a chance to decode the physics around that region,” Ma said. By supporting the theory of general relativity, the results “proved that Einstein was correct again,” he added.

The scientists emphasized that more research was needed to decipher what can be gleaned about event horizons using this method. But they did detect information about how black holes twist space around themselves as they rotate — a phenomenon known as “frame dragging.” “This is similar to pushing a glass into a table and twisting it, so that the tablecloth winds up around it,” Maximiliano Isi, a gravitational wave astrophysicist at Columbia University, told AFP. In the future, the scientists hope to find signs of tiny changes known as quantum fluctuations. “In this way, we can really probe this near-horizon region to look for new physics,” including searching for a deviation from general relativity, Ma said.

Better description, please

By necro81 • Score: 5, Informative Thread
There’s a lot of breathless reporting going on here (“Sometimes I cannot believe this is really happening.”) And a whole lot of rehashing about gravitational waves, LIGO, etc. - stuff that’s been around for years now. But very, very little explanation about what they’ve actually think they’ve found here. Fingerprints of the event horizon? What the hell does that even mean?

I was able to glean a tiny bit more from the article abstract (lack of Unicode support makes copy/paste difficult):

The horizon of a black hole, the ‘surface of no return’, is characterized by its rotation frequency [Omega_H] and surface gravity [Kappa]. A striking signature is that any infalling object appears to orbit at [Omega_H] owing to frame dragging, while its emitted signals decay exponentially at a rate set by [Kappa] as a consequence of gravitational redshift. Recent theoretical work [1] predicts that gravitational waves from binary black-hole mergers carry direct imprints of the properties of the merger remnant in the form of a ‘direct wave’. This gravitational-wave component oscillates near 2*[Omega_H], reflecting the horizon’s frame dragging, and decays at an increasing rate characterized by [Kappa], with additional screening from the black hole’s spacetime. Here we report observational evidence of a direct wave in GW2501142, with a 90% credible matched-filter signal-to-noise ratio of [Numbers and Uncertainty values] in the LIGO Hanford (Livingston) detector. The measured properties are in full agreement with theoretical predictions for a Kerr black hole. These findings establish an observational channel to directly measure frame-dragging effects in black-hole ergospheres and explore (near-)horizon physics in dynamical, strong-gravity regimes.

Still, without being in the gravitational-wave field, it’s still pretty hard to see what all the fuss is about.

skeptical astrophysicist

By ZipNada • Score: 3 Thread

From the cited article;

Sean McWilliams, an astrophysicist at West Virginia University, was skeptical that the gravitational wave frequency analyzed by the scientists was actually “dictated” by the event horizon.

For this reason, “the actual observed signal doesn’t really tell us anything about the horizon or the other properties directly related to it,” he told AFP.

Re:Better description, please

By burtosis • Score: 5, Informative Thread
What’s left off this article is the technicality of what an event horizon is, for there are several types depending on how you look at it. For example, there is the formal event horizon, which is the boundary across which light rays internal to it won’t reach outward but this is nebulous and spread out across space and time. Then there is the apparent horizon, which is the colloquial one people are more familiar with that is the schwarzchild radius static in a moment of time and space that is the boundary where light rays can’t escape from. When two black holes merge, as the two separate horizons approach each other, the localized spacetime can become closed off from the rest of the visible universe without passing either of those two radiuses and before they merge because the average mass in that spacetime vicinity forms a horizon around the two merging black holes. PBS Spacetime has a nice episode on it. Detailed measurements of mergers will give us a better understanding of the entire picture of how these events play out and shape spacetime.

Still, without being in the gravitational-wave field, it’s still pretty hard to see what all the fuss is about.

Ha, just like being close to a supernova can cause such extreme neutrino flux you can actually die of radiation from it interacting with your body, being within a couple of horizon widths of the merger can probably put such excessive stress on your body from the force of sloshing space time as to actually kill you. Which is kind of insane.

Re:skeptical astrophysicist

By burtosis • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
The big deal here is the signal to noise ratio was close to 70, whereas most mergers are 20 or less. This lets scientists see the merger, or chirp signal, with much better fidelity. While it’s true it’s not necessarily a smoking gun of any particular new insight, getting cleaner and stronger measurements is what will ultimately show what spacetime is actually doing so that it can be compared to theory.

Spain To Require Carriers To Keep Mobile Networks Live During Power Outages

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Reuters:
Spain will require mobile networks to have backup systems that maintain connectivity when power outages occur. Per a royal decree that will be approved by the end of 2026, mobile network operators (MNOs) and infrastructure companies will need to install batteries or other backups to keep service active for at least four hours during a blackout.

The mobile network rules will apply to businesses that serve at least 500,000 users or generate upwards of 50 million euros ($56.9 million) in annual revenue. The decree will stipulate that half of the population will need to be covered by this failsafe within the first year, then 65 percent in the second year and three quarters in the third.

[…] The decree will require other key infrastructure elements to remain up and running for a certain period after a power outage. For instance, control centers that could impact all of Spain if they were to go offline will need to remain in service for at least 24 hours. Emergency call centers will also need to have plans in place to maintain operations, as Reuters notes.
The move is in response to the widespread blackout across the Iberian peninsula in 2025, which left more than 50 million people without power. Experts called it “the most severe and unprecedented blackout that had occurred in Europe in the past 20 years.”

Re:Full Circle

By Firethorn • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

I remember that, but things have improved a lot. A cell tower only takes 1-8kW, and we have drastically better batteries.
Plus, a lot fewer land lines, so need to keep the towers up for emergency services.

Re:You mean they somehow didn’t before?

By test321 • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Nordic:
* Finland: Requirement for 4G is 15 min https://www.kyberturvallisuusk…
* Norway: used to be 2-4 hours; was increased to 8-24 hours after the Spanish blackout https://www.telenor.com/who-we…

Non-Nordic:
* Netherlands (as comparison): These people say the network crashes in 4-8 hours https://www.localmesh.nl/en/co…

Re:cost?

By Alain Williams • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

What will the cost of not doing this be to: customers, emergency services, … ?

Re:Full Circle

By Tapewolf • Score: 5, Informative Thread

All mobile towers have battery backup. It’s a question of time. 24 hours is a lot and I wonder if the people who thought about this considered how achievable this was, especially if your network has a lot of micro cells.

24 hours is for critical infrastructure, “Control centers” as the summary puts it. For cell towers, they only mandated 4 hours which should be a lot easier.

I’m surprised this wasn’t already required

By v1 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Here in the USA anyway, cellular service has been considered “critical infrastructure” for quite some time now, mostly due to the decline of landlines. 9-1-1 having high availability has been legally required for a long time, and those requirements shifted to the cellular network as people ditched their land-lines for cell phones at home. So all the towers have short-term (15+ minute) UPS’s and a gas generator that auto starts, with requirements to run periodic tests.

The other part of it though is the towers nowadays require internet access to function. We had a massive storm system move through the area a few years ago with close to tornado-speed “straight-line winds” that took out a huge amount of above-ground internet infrastructure, rendering cell towers functionally disabled despite giving out full bars. There were a few lines still up but everyone’s home internet was either down or spotty, and it was hard to get a cell call to connect. Was llke that for 2-3 weeks, really annoying.

So, power’s not the only thing that needs to be protected to keep cellular service working.

Polestar Banned From Selling Cars In US From Model Year 2027

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Longtime Slashdot reader schwit1 shares a report from autoevolution:
The U.S. Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security denied Polestar an authorization under the Connected Vehicle Rule. Polestar will continue to sell its existing inventory of Polestar 3 and 4 crossovers in the United States and will continue to offer support to customers and access to its service network. But no new 2027 models will set wheels on American soil.

The Connected Vehicle Rule is a regulation that restricts the import and sale of vehicles equipped with Vehicle Connectivity Systems (VCS) and Automated Driving Systems (ADS) tied to foreign adversaries, primarily from China and Russia. Polestar is owned by Chinese auto giant Geely, which has also been the parent company of Swedish brand Volvo since 2010. However, Volvo has recently been granted authorization to sell connected vehicles in the United States.

The rule, set out by the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS), classifies modern vehicles as mobile data centers and is designed to protect national security by keeping sensitive driver data and vehicle control systems out of the hands of foreign governments. Michael Lohscheller, Polestar CEO, confirms that the company is well aware that the automotive industry is entering a new phase, based on regional dynamics. So, Polestar will shift its strategy to its biggest market as it is preparing its exit from the U.S. market.
The report notes that Polestar sold 5,384 cars in the U.S. in 2025, with 60,119 units sold globally.

Re:Volvo but not Polestar?

By dfghjk • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Volvo sells gas-powered cars. Killing Polestar is a twofer, it’s anti-Chiner AND anti-EV, plus Musk likes it.

"…designed to protect national security by keeping sensitive driver data and vehicle control systems out of the hands of foreign governments…”

Now there’s some complete nonsense. Nothing worse than having that data in the hands of Elon Musk.

Re:The best outcome…

By PPH • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The best possible outcome would be for everyone to release cars with no connectivity or automated driving systems.

Re:Volvo but not Polestar?

By e432776 • Score: 5, Informative Thread
Well, if you need a new EV, I have some Good news! As far as I know this is the only “unconnected” vehicle on the market (I could be wrong). We will see how it sells…

Re:Volvo but not Polestar?

By _merlin • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Volvo is still Swedish, but they don’t sell cars. They sell trucks, earthmoving equipment, marine diesel powerplants, etc. They also own various other brands (e.g. Mack trucks). Volvo-branded cars, like Polestar, are a Geely brand. It’s kind of like how Rolls Royce is still British, but Rolls Royce-branded cars no longer have nothing to do with them, being BMW products.

Re:Volvo but not Polestar?

By gtall • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Tell us what planet you live on? $70K you say. Let’s deduct from that the cost of taxes, health care, utilities, food, etc. Plus you’ll be wanting to save a bit for a rainy day.

Trump Administration Asks OpenAI To Stagger Release of New Model

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
The Trump administration has reportedly asked OpenAI to stagger the release of GPT-5.6 over security concerns. The model will initially be offered to a small group of partners, with the government “approving access customer by customer during this preview period,” reports The Information. The request came from conversations with the Office of the National Cyber Director and the Office of Science and Technology Policy, the report said.

The worst three words possible

By MpVpRb • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

government approving access

Well well well..

By Vegan Cyclist • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

This sure sounds COMMUNIST to me.

It has achieved super intelligence.

By backslashdot • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Guys, this is a major milestone the AIs have finally achieved a higher intelligence level than the government.

AT the rate pretty soon its IQ will be nearing the upper double digits.

Re:Bygone days.

By Anonymous Coward • Score: 5, Informative Thread

I think Obama was one of our better presidents, but the government loaning Solyndra $535 was WRONG.

Just as a reality check, the loan to Solyndra was just one loan out of hundreds in the Department of Energy loan program, representing 1.6% of the total loans under that program. Despite a few companies that received loans having going bankrupt, overall the loan program made back the money loaned out with interest. The program did not lose money.

Since the program was intended to kick-start development of technologies that that were too risky to get loans from banks, the fact that the majority of the loans were paid back with interest indicates to me that the businesses chosen weren’t risky enough.

Re: Bygone days.

By teg • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Republicans lost two presidential elections, 2008 & 2012, due to running conservative candidates. So they gave up and became a further-left party. Now Obama looks like a relative conservative .. but Clinton & Harris look conservative _too_.

Voters are insisting on left-wing presidents, with the exception of Biden because the initial leftist shock of Trump pt1 was too much to absorb.

The current GOP is not left. They’re extreme right at the moment - fascist-adjacent is not “minimal state”. There’s nothing conservative left, it’s been consumed by right wing populism with a mix of fascism The current administration. It’s corruption, populism, fascim, racism, disdain for knowledge, and plain stupidity in an ugly mix.

Linux Foundation Launches Akrites To Coordinate AI-Driven Open Source Security

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
BrianFagioli writes:
The Linux Foundation has announced Akrites, a new initiative to coordinate vulnerability disclosure and remediation for critical open source software as AI dramatically speeds up vulnerability discovery. Founding members include AWS, Google, Microsoft, OpenAI, Red Hat, NVIDIA, IBM, Cisco, JPMorganChase, and others. Akrites will provide a shared Security Incident Response Team (SIRT), a standardized coordinated vulnerability disclosure process, and act as a “maintainer of last resort” for abandoned but widely used packages.

The goal is to reduce duplicate reports, avoid conflicting patches, and help upstream maintainers address vulnerabilities before they can be exploited. As AI makes it easier to find security flaws, can a coordinated industry effort help protect open source, or does it risk giving large corporations too much influence over the ecosystem?
“Akrites is the largest coordinated effort in history to create systems and deploy tooling that leverages the collective power of the community to make everyone safer,” the Linux Foundation said in an open letter. “Akrites participants will contribute engineering resources; work to build and ship fixes; or fund the engineers who do. Some companies have contributed mightily already. The reality is, collectively, we need to contribute more.”

Apple Raises Prices On Macs, iPads, and More By Hundreds of Dollars

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Apple has sharply raised prices across its Mac, iPad, HomePod, and Apple TV lineups as surging AI-driven demand creates a global memory and storage shortage. Increases range from $30 for the HomePod mini to $1,300 for the M3 Ultra Mac Studio, with Apple CEO Tim Cook saying efforts to shield customers from higher costs had become “unsustainable.” The Verge reports:
On Thursday, the company adjusted the price of its new MacBook Neo, which will now start at $699 instead of $599, while the base MacBook Air will jump to $1,299 from $1,099, as reported earlier by Bloomberg. The 14-inch MacBook Pro is getting an increase as well, going from $1,699 to $1,999. Meanwhile, the iPad Air will now start at $749 instead of $599, while the iPad Pro is increasing to $1,199 from $999.

As spotted by MacRumors, the M4 Max Mac Studio will now cost $2,499, a big jump from $1,999. The M3 Ultra Mac Studio is now priced at $5,299, up from $3,999. Apple is even raising the prices of its HomePod, which now costs $349 instead of $299, as well as bumping the price of the HomePod mini to $129 instead of $99. The Apple TV also now costs $199 instead of $129.

Re:That’s perfectly okay!

By Jeremi • Score: 5, Funny Thread

I’m an Apple fan; I’m typing this on a 2018 Mac Mini that I spent roughly $2K on — but it’s 2026 and that Mac is still running just great. That works out to an amortized cost of about 68 cents per day — which is to say, negligible compared to my other expenses.

Trying to save money by buying cheap computer hardware is like trying to save money by buying single-ply toilet paper — you can do it, sure, but why make your life noticeably worse when the amount of money you’ll save is trivial?

Re:Who’s Who?

By MightyMartian • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Frankly, the quality of build, the stability of the operating system, and just the plain reliability and features even in the supporting tools exceed Windows. Take the Preview App. The work I can do on PDFs; signatures, annotations, OCR, right out of the box, and built so that the versions on my iPhone and iPad fully integrate, cannot be easily replicated on Windows. Apple just really has an eye for workflow, and making sure the base system and tools fit well into that.

It’s not perfect, to be sure, I wouldn’t want to use Pages as my full time word processor, and Apple, like Microsoft and Google, suffer designed interoperation friction, which does suck. But all in all, I’m just more efficient on a Mac, and in subtle ways I never knew were even problems until I picked a MacBook up the first time. Honestly going to Windows right now is just horrible for me, particular Windows 11, which just feels like constant chaos and out of control busy-ness.

Re:Who’s Who?

By BenBoy • Score: 5, Funny Thread

> Saved myself $1040. That was right before the price hikes.
Oof, bet that hurts. Think of how much you’d have saved if you’d waited until today …

Re:Because they can.

By Mousit • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

They raised prices because they can. The shortage gave them cover.

What really made it blatant was that they also raised prices in their Certified Refurbished store. You know, the store for shit which RAM costs were already long-ago paid.

Re:Because they can.

By radarskiy • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

They raised prices because they can. The shortage gave them cover.

What really made it blatant was that they also raised prices in their Certified Refurbished store. You know, the store for shit which RAM costs were already long-ago paid.

-1, economically illiterate

The increased prices for new items will increase demand for refurbished items. In the short term the supply of refurbished items is constant so the price goes up. In the long term, this creates an incentive to refurbish more marginal items that would require more parts and labor than they could have previously recovered.

LastPass Says Hackers Stole Customer Support Case Data During Klue Breach

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
LastPass says hackers stole customers’ personal information, support case records, and sales data by breaching market research partner Klue. The password manager told TechCrunch that its own systems and password vaults were unaffected. However, the hackers used their access to obtain “reams of data about LastPass customers,” the report says. From the report:
In a blog post that shared information about the incident, LastPass said the hackers took customers’ names, phone numbers, email addresses, and physical addresses, as well as customer support case data and sales-related data. It’s not yet known what was in the contents of customer support tickets, although they likely contain fragments of potentially private or sensitive information. Customers typically contact customer service when they are having a billing issue or need assistance in gaining access to their accounts. Past incidents involving customer support tickets have included credentials and government-issued identity documents.
The last data breach LastPass reported was in 2022, when hackers stole the company’s entire store of customer password vaults.

You’re having sex with every LastPass partner

By JoeyRox • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Password manager maker LastPass is notifying customers that their personal information and customer support case records were stolen during a recent hack at one of its technology partners, marking the company’s latest data breach in recent years.

The expression “when you have sex with someone, you’re having sex with every one of their partners as well” appears to apply to security software providers as well.

I guess …

By PPH • Score: 4, Funny Thread

… LastPass is Klue-less.

Potentially private or sensitive information?

By crunchy_one • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
I’d wager a guess that this information includes the accounts that the customer is using LastPass to store passwords for. Even without the passwords themselves, this could be some really juicy blackmail material.

I’ve seen enough

By Arrogant-Bastard • Score: 4, Informative Thread
Although to be more precise: I saw enough about LastPass years ago. This is the N’th security incident that they’ve publicly admitted. No doubt the number of incidents they’re aware of is higher, and no doubt the number of incidents they’re not aware of is still higher.

I think at this point it’s safe to presume that any information shared with LastPass has been compromised or will be compromised shortly. Part of that is because they’re incompetent, but most of it is because there’s no way for any operation to do what they’ve set out to do: the threat model is completely against them. What they’ve built is one-stop shopping for attackers, so it’s worth much more time, money, attention, and risk than many other operations. Obviously attackers know this and have planned/executed accordingly.

The right thing to do — which won’t happen because almost nobody does the right thing — is to admit failure, issue refunds, and shut down.

Number 6!

By gabrieltss • Score: 4, Informative Thread
This makes the 6th data breach they have had. Why anyone would still be using them is a total mystery to me!

There are roughly five -publicly- disclosed security incidents (how many not publicly disclosed?):
2011
2015 - one of the two of the worst
2016
2017
2022 - 2023 - the worst


Now you can add 2026 to the list

Anthropic Says Alibaba Must Be Punished For Largest Claude Cloning Attack

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica:
Anthropic has accused the Chinese firm Alibaba of launching the largest attack yet attempting to clone Claude, as China races to match the capabilities of Anthropic’s leading model following Mythos’ release and subsequent restriction from foreign markets. Ars obtained a June 10 letter sent to Senators Tim Scott (R-S.C.) and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) one day ahead of a Senate committee hearing on “AI and the American Dream.” In the letter, Anthropic shared “new, confidential evidence of the largest campaign to illicitly extract Claude’s capabilities we have ever measured.”

The attacks occurred between April 22 and June 5, when “operators afliated with Alibaba and Alibaba Qwen, Alibaba’s AI lab” allegedly generated “more than 28.8 million exchanges with Claude through almost 25,000 fraudulent accounts,” Anthropic said. Violating Claude’s terms of service and access restrictions, this campaign “targeted some of Claude’s most valuable capabilities, such as agentic reasoning, software engineering, and long-horizon tasks.” According to Anthropic, Alibaba evaded detection by “using obfuscation techniques and proxy networks.” As Chinese demand for reliable obfuscation techniques increases, Anthropic warned there’s already “a growing circumvention economy” to fuel an ever-expanding web of future distillation attacks. […]

“Alibaba is governed by an independent board, none of whom has any military affiliation,” Alibaba said. “Its products and services are built for retail, logistics, and enterprise information technology — not weapons, defense, or intelligence.” Anthropic appears unconvinced, however, that Alibaba isn’t working with the Chinese government. In the letter, Anthropic warned that without stronger interventions, these distillation attacks will “help China reach Mythos Preview-level capabilities sooner.”

To keep the US ahead of China, Anthropic recommended that Congress pass legislation with three objectives. First, antitrust laws must be updated to allow AI firms to share information about evolving Chinese tactics to deter more threats. Second, the US needs more export controls on chips to hamstring Chinese access to advanced compute so that they simply can’t train on US model outputs. That could make conducting distillation attacks pointless, Anthropic suggested. Finally, Congress should pass laws penalizing Chinese labs’ “bad behavior” so that it’s “more difficult and costly” to rely on distillation attacks to advance Chinese models. Penalties could include limiting Chinese firms from accessing US models or advanced US chips or from relying on data centers outside of China, Anthropic suggested.

Vizzini

By Anonymous Coward • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

You’re trying to kidnap what I’ve rightfully stolen!

World’s Biggest Raccoon

By bistromath007 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

“Don’t touch my garbage! I stole it fair and square!”

Re:“Working with the government”

By XopherMV • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
China is a communist country. That’s a whole other level of government involvement in the economy and specific companies such as Alibaba than you’ll find anywhere in the US.

Pot… meet kettle…

By Morpeth • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

All of these massive LLM companies were built on stealing copyrighted materials and other prior work to train their models (and then profit from it without paying for the data/images/etc), so the whole thing is hilariously thick with irony. “Hey, you can’t steal the sh*t I stole!”

Now where did I put that teeny tiny violin…

Re:“Working with the government”

By ceoyoyo • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

In communist societies communes are the companies and there is no government. Communes are like companies except the people who work in them own them. Thus “workers own the means of production.”

China isn’t communist. It’s not even the fake communist that you get when revolutionaries establish a “transitional government,” or the economically communist that China sort of was until Mao died. It is authoritarian, which is where the government has a lot of power to tell everyone what to do.

The GP didn’t ignore your original comment, they corrected it.

Ford Rehires 350 Engineers After AI Fails To Preserve Expertise or Train Juniors

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
After Ford’s automated quality-control systems and AI tools fell short, the automaker hired 350 veteran engineers over the past three years to mentor younger staff and reprogram the underperforming technology. “Artificial intelligence is a fantastic tool, but it’s only as good as the information you use to train it,” Charles Poon, Ford’s vice president of vehicle hardware engineering, told reporters on a call Wednesday. “Over prior years, we didn’t pay as much attention as we should have to the experience of our most knowledgeable engineers that have been with us through many product cycles.” Bloomberg reports:
Those engineers were “at the heart” of Ford’s efforts to turn around quality problems, said Kumar Galhotra, chief operating officer. They now run mandatory meetings that rigorously troubleshoot quality problems and they have reprogrammed AI tools to head off glitches before they happen. “We had been relying more and more on automated quality systems” and not getting the desired results, Galhotra said. “We brought back technical specialists” and “they hunt for failure points before a part ever reaches the plant floor.”

The return of the veteran engineers at Ford cuts against the prevailing wisdom — and fear — that AI will replace all kinds of knowledge workers. But Ford found the machines couldn’t replace experience. “Mistakenly we thought that by just introducing artificial intelligence and ingesting the design requirements that we had, that that would produce a high-quality product,” Poon said. But “we recognized that for us to enhance some of our automation and machine learning and artificial intelligence tools we needed to ensure that they were trained by the most experienced individuals.”

As a result of the efforts of the old hands, Ford vaulted above quality stalwarts such as Toyota and Honda on JD Power’s bellwether survey that measures the quality of a car during the first three months of ownership. Only luxury brands Porsche and Genesis topped Ford this year.

Re: Charles Poon

By Tomahawk • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Just like every other CEO that thinks AI is a magic bullet.

Re:GIGO

By eneville • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

This kind of thing has happened previously too, but it was via “outsourcing” in another contract that didn’t work out, so they need the employees back, sometimes as consultants.

What’s old is new again.

Re:GIGO

By Provos • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

One of the most aggravating things right now is “AI” in the hiring process - companies use it to screen applicants but then all use a common tool like Workday, which is facing a lawsuit in California that seems to be automatically rejecting applicants at all employers once it rejects the candidate at a single employer. Applicants have no idea they’ve been blindly rejected and the hiring managers, some of whom are absolutely desperate to hire, are never even seeing the applicants’ resumes.

(Hapless, because they took the offer to come back instead of finding an employer that properly valued their expertise and experience.)

Keep floundering in a job market that over-rejects people or take a job that gets them income and possibly time to pad their resume with AI related keywords that are legit? Should you really be blaming them for taking the offer?

Re:Shows you what they were thinking

By gweihir • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

They are not super interested in thinking. Just in getting rich without effort, including mental effort.

Incidentally, I just saw a study that predicts that in 2028, LLM-code will be more expensive to get than code written by people. And that does not take insecurity, review-resistance, bad maintainability, loss of engineering skills and institutional knowledge, etc. into account. The whole thing is a massive hallucination by completely disconnected idiots.

Re:…Doofus execs given bonuses

By Inglix the Mad • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
This happened at Kimberly-Clark regarding outsourcing.

A small group of people was offered advanced training on a software package that was hot. They were offered company their standard pay plus weekly paid flights, lodging, meals, and a small guaranteed bump in salary, the whole ten yards, for months to go on-site and get the skills. All they had to do was sign a contract stating they would hang around for a couple years, with the caveat that if they quit they would have to pay that substantial amount of money back.

Fast forward a short period of time, in contract terms, and new executives come in and look at “costs” to cut. Why, look at those expensive people! They can outsource that for less so they fire the people they spent a ridiculous amount to train. This was bad for the workers, but as they didn’t quit the company ate the training costs. All of them ended up working elsewhere because those skills were in demand.

Fast forward again and the overseas offshoring company is causing more problems than osolutions. So KC goes looking to rehire these people. Well most of them were employed, for a LOT more money than KC had been paying. They did manage to get a couple people back… but at SIGNIFICANTLY higher costs and three of them flat out refused to come back as regular employees and were hired as consultants for a bit more than FOUR times their previous salaries.

Micron Locks In Historically High Memory Prices For Five Years

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot
Micron has signed 16 “strategic customer agreements” (SCAs) that include a floor price the company says comes with “a very robust gross margin for Micron, well above our peak quarterly margins in any past cycle.” Most of the deals run through 2030 and cover about 40% of Micron’s revenue. The Register reports:
Micron CEO, president and chairman Sanjay Mehrotra explained the SCAs in prepared remarks delivered during the company’s Q3 earnings call. He explained that Micron has signed 16 SCAs, most of them covering 2026 to 2030, and that they involve a commitment to buy a certain quantity of product and pay for it in a pricing band that has a floor and a ceiling price. The floor price covers the historically high gross margins mentioned above, and the ceiling price means those who commit to an SCA are insulated if memory prices go even higher.

The CEO said 16 customers have signed SCAs and then explained why it’s worth locking into the deals even though they bake in such high margins. “Our customers are recognizing that supply shortages in memory and storage will take considerable time to improve,” he said. “Even as we expect industry supply to improve gradually in 2028, we currently do not have line of sight as to when memory supply will be able to catch up with increasing demand.”

Even massive efforts to build new chip fabs aren’t much help, he said, because the increasing complexity of new memory types means it takes longer to build factories — and when they come online there still won’t be enough capacity to build both the high-bandwidth memory needed for AI and other types of NAND and DRAM. “Supply is structurally constrained in its growth and ability to meet industry demand, despite our comprehensive efforts to increase supply,” he said.

Don’t assume that SCAs mean your suppliers get price certainty, because Mehrotra said the deals will account for 40 percent of Micron revenue — meaning the company is reserving most of its inventory to sell at prices it can negotiate. The CEO did have a little good news in the form of predictions that Micron’s DRAM output in 2026 will “grow in the low- to mid-20s percentage range, slightly above our prior outlook.” He also revealed that the SCAs see customers pay up front, which helps Micron to fund its fab expansions.

Raping users is back on the menu, boys!

By JustAnotherOldGuy • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

“Raping users is back on the menu, boys! Now get out there and change all the prices!”

I feel like this signals something.

By nightflameauto • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

If a company is announcing that they’ve locked 16 bigger customers into historically high pricing, while locking themselves out of rising to meet future potential prices, is that a signal that we’ve about hit the peak of the memory demand / high-price cycle? Something tells me if they went out of their way to get these price floors in place, someone in the company saw the potential for that floor to be pierced in the next few months. I mean, you’d think the signing companies would consider this possibility too, but it’s entirely possible that FOMO on AI is keeping them at the peak of the wave during negotiations.

Something about this situation just strikes me as a tell. Maybe I’m wrong, but it seems like it’s a predictor of something changing.

Re:Raping users is back on the menu, boys!

By sabbede • Score: 5, Informative Thread
Prices are high because demand is exceeding supply. If the supply increases, the price will decrease. That’s basic economics.

That said, the fab would not have been completed yet, (this just happened a few weeks ago), so no, prices would not be lower today. Expanding supply remains necessary regardless, but 10 people denied everyone else the benefits, because they had a bug in their ass. And, quite possibly, Chinese funding.

I’d appreciate it if you backed off on the patronizing “summer child” tone. Economics doesn’t care.

Re:Raping users is back on the menu, boys!

By almitydave • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Prices are high because demand is exceeding supply. If the supply increases, the price will decrease. That’s basic economics.

That might be true if both prices and supply weren’t artificially fixed by a cartel. Note that there are even fewer major DRAM manufacturers now than there were then, so it’s much easier to ensure everyone’s in on the collusion. See also Gamer’s Nexus coverage.

No lessons were learned from the last time. The Samsung manager that went to prison got a promotion after being released. This Micron deal is absolutely them holding their customers over a barrel using limited supply to demand locked-in price deals. If you don’t sign up, you go to the back of the line. “It’d be a shame if you couldn’t buy RAM for that device you’re making.”

Micron boasts about price-fixing, loudly

By ebunga • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

What’s old is new again.