Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Microsoft Accidentally Breaks Replying To an Email On Outlook
  2. Following User Outcry, AMD Reinstates Memory Encryption In Consumer CPUs
  3. Valve Will Finally Let You Build Your Own Steam Machine With SteamOS For Desktop
  4. Google Invests $75 Million In A24 To Develop AI-Powered Filmmaking Tools
  5. Some Electricians Think Building Data Centers Is For Sellouts
  6. Valve Prices the Steam Machine At $1,049
  7. AI Law Firm Wins UK Court Case For First Time
  8. 2,000 Retired Google Pixel Phones Get a Second Life As a Private Cloud
  9. Ubisoft Co-Founder Claude Guillemot Dies In Plane Crash
  10. Several US States Bet That AI Can Solve Their Prison Recidivism Crisis
  11. ‘Tutor’ Who Took Online Tests for 124 Students Jailed for Three Years
  12. TikTok Shows 3x More AI Slop Than YouTube, Report Finds
  13. Someone Forked systemd Over Its New Birth Date Field
  14. The Secret Revolution in Battery Technology: 3-D Printing
  15. Is Tesla Planning To Sell Modular AI Data Center Hardware?

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Microsoft Accidentally Breaks Replying To an Email On Outlook

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Microsoft has accidentally introduced a bug in Outlook for Mac that omits the original message from email replies, making it difficult for recipients to follow conversation history. Until Microsoft releases a fix, its suggested workaround is to roll back from version 16.110 and disable automatic updates, which is “great for users in full control of their devices — not so good for anyone with a managed device,” notes The Register. “Administrators with fleets of Macs running Outlook should brace for helpdesk tickets.” From the report:
In some instances, having a user copy and paste the salient bits of the email they are responding to might not be such a bad thing. We’ve all had emails that required epic amounts of scrolling to find what started the conversation, so forcing users to think about what they actually need to include is no bad thing. However, disrupting user workflows without warning — well, that is undoubtedly a bad thing.

This is, after all, one of the most basic things an email client needs to do, so shipping a product with a bug that breaks this functionality says more about Microsoft’s approach to quality than anything else.

More importantly

By Valgrus Thunderaxe • Score: 3 Thread
That’s going to break a PGP reply chain and the subsequent messages will be made unreadable.

Following User Outcry, AMD Reinstates Memory Encryption In Consumer CPUs

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Last week, AMD was found to have stripped memory encryption from its consumer CPUs without any warning or notice. Now, following a wave of backlash on social media, the chipmaker has now reinstated the protection, though it still hasn’t explained why the safeguard was disabled in the first place. Ars Technica reports:
Following the revelation, social media was deluged by comments from AMD consumers decrying the move. They noted that AMD’s quiet removal of TSME after supporting it for so long seemed underhanded. The move came solely as a result of firmware changes made in a recent update. With no physical changes required to silicon, continued support was largely, if not purely, a matter of will rather than a necessity required by changes to hardware. The critics called on AMD to reverse the move.

Over the weekend, AMD said it planned to do just that in a firmware update scheduled for release next month. More often than not, the chipmaker refers to TSME as Memory Guard. “Regarding certain non-PRO Ryzen 9000-series desktop processors, a BIOS option to enable Memory Guard was previously available but was removed in a recent update,” AMD said in an email. “Based on valuable community feedback, we will reinstate this option in an upcoming BIOS release in July.”

The company has yet to explain why it removed the protection. Critics speculate that AMD dropped it in an attempt to steer customers toward more costly CPUs. It’s possible, though, that there were less nefarious reasons, such as the difficulty of continued support as chip designs changed. Another possibility is that AMD made the move for performance reasons. Encrypting and decrypting data in memory creates latency. Slowdowns are the enemy of gamers, one of the more popular customer segments using the 9000-line of Ryzen processors. Since many gamers already voluntarily disabled TSME and had little need for it in the first place, AMD may not have considered the change of much consequence.

Valve Will Finally Let You Build Your Own Steam Machine With SteamOS For Desktop

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
With the price of the new Steam Machine starting at $1,049, you might want to consider making your own Steam Machine instead. An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Verge:
Valve says that “starting with the SteamOS 3.8 release, you can put together your own Steam Machine using whatever PC parts you want.” SteamOS 3.8.10 launched last week with a slew of updates, including “improved compatibility with recent Intel and AMD platforms.” Alongside that improved compatibility, Valve is giving gamers the green light to install SteamOS on their own desktops. In an interview with The Verge, Valve’s Pierre-Loup Griffais said Valve has been “rolling out improvements to [SteamOS] so it’s more compatible with desktop hardware,” including eventual support for Nvidia graphics. Griffais says Valve has “a growing team” working on Nvidia driver support for SteamOS, adding, “We’re collaborating with Nvidia very closely.” While he mentioned that Nvidia support might not come this year, Griffais emphasized that “it’s certainly something that we’re working on in the background.”

It’s technically been possible to run SteamOS on your own hardware for a while now, but compatibility has been mostly limited to AMD systems. So far installing it has also required using a Steam Deck recovery image, a process that, speaking from experience, is much less straightforward than the installation process for most other Linux distributions. Trying to run SteamOS on Intel or Nvidia hardware has not been easy so far. According to Griffais, Valve is working to change that, which could mean that down the line, you’ll be able to run SteamOS on just about any gaming PC hardware you want, including Nvidia.

For the more immediate future, Griffais says SteamOS in its current state should offer a “good experience” on console-like PC setups: “If you have something that is similar to the use case of a Steam Machine, where you have a PC that’s gonna be plugged into a TV, and has a single hard drive that you’re not going to try and dual boot [] you can put SteamOS on there, and you’ll have an experience that is very similar to a Steam Deck docked or a Steam Machine, with some caveats, of course,” like a lack of HDMI-CEC support. But “the core bits of the experience are there. The SteamOS graphics driver, the shader precompilation […] you can get at all of that with the SteamOS.”
Griffais says SteamOS does not yet offer an easy way to dual-boot alongside Windows or another operating system, but envisions “a time where it’s a better experience to install on your desktop and have it coexist with a different operating system.”

Re:Datacenters have effectively killed gaming

By sound+vision • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

The article quotes that $1000 figure as if it’s something outlandish. It was a normal price for lower-mid-tier gaming PC last year. And this year the $1000 mark is more of a floor, a minimum you have to spend to get a gaming PC. Anything under that, you might as well get a Playstation. Although those are raising up now too.

Google Invests $75 Million In A24 To Develop AI-Powered Filmmaking Tools

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Google is investing roughly $75 million in A24 as part of a research partnership with DeepMind to develop AI-powered filmmaking tools and workflows. “The deal represents the latest marriage between a Hollywood studio and AI in an era where companies have oscillated between partnerships and lawsuits,” reports Variety. From the report:
A24 partner Scott Belsky, who leads the studio’s technology division A24 Labs, told the Journal the studio’s Google partnership differed from other deals because AI developers mistakenly advertised their products as a means to make films cheaper and faster. His division is developing applications for AI-generated storyboards, another reimagination of the production process that has seen filmmakers like Martin Scorsese rubber-stamp.
“We think there are better uses that preserve creative control and support risk-taking,” said Belsky, arguing the new tools “won’t look anything like the prompted generation type of AI that people feel uncomfortable with.”

It’s not the way that it looks

By ebunga • Score: 3 Thread

It’s the fact that it’s AI slop you dullards.

Re:It’s not the way that it looks

By omnichad • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The most boring part of filmmaking is matching up picture and audio from a dozen or more takes in line with the storyboard. I think it would be great to see AI take raw footage and build a skeleton project file with all of the different takes matched up with their respective audio and cut to fit the rough storyboard. Then you spend your time and resources on the actual creative parts. These are already the lowest paid people involved in a film anyway and they probably don’t exactly enjoy the work.

Re:It’s not the way that it looks

By ceoyoyo • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Scanning for Starbucks cups, flagging possible continuity errors, pose estimation and tracking for motion capture, inserting CGI, rendering, there are all sorts of boring tasks that could be automated or improved if already automated.

Missing the point as usual

By flibbidyfloo • Score: 3 Thread
Once again, the non-creatives like Belsky completely fail to understand why creatives (and those sympathetic) are upset about Ai. It’s not because the prompt-generated garbage is garbage. And if he thinks CEOs and bean counters won’t push to use the Ai to save money by cutting staff and creative budgets, he’s delusional or willfully stupid. First they came for the storyboard artists, and I said nothing, because who the F*ck cares about storyboards?

Some Electricians Think Building Data Centers Is For Sellouts

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Wired:
As Big Tech dumps billions of dollars into America’s data center buildout, a slew of opportunities have opened up to the electricians wiring these massive facilities. In some cases, the scale of the projects and the demanding construction timelines are fueling talent wars for the industry’s best and brightest. The US-based International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) has argued that its workers are “powering the AI Revolution,” and a set of “Data Center Principles” published in March argues that union labor is “essential to the future of AI.” Tech companies are trying to meet the moment: Meta recently announced a skilled trade academy program, and Google committed $50 million to help train people in skilled trades.

But amid growing national opposition to data centers, debates over the ethics of the massive buildout have started to pop up in some online pockets of the community. Threads about how AI will affect the economy now pepper r/electricians, a subreddit with around half a million monthly visitors. Some users wonder whether the work will eventually prompt widespread job losses. Others aren’t sure if their labor makes them complicit in the damage done to local communities or whether it’s unethical to take on data center work. For some, the answer is a firm no. Ultimately, they argue, work is work.
An anonymous Midwest electrician who spoke to Wired acknowledged concerns about scams, corporate greed, and AI’s impact on workers, but said he views data centers as an important source of career advancement. “This is most likely going to be a major part of our future. And if you can’t beat them, join them,” he said.
An electrician named Ryan, meanwhile, is strongly opposed to working on data centers because he distrusts the corporations and political environment driving AI development. Still, if the facilities are going to be built, he would prefer union workers construct them. “If they’re going to get built, I’d rather they go union,” he said.

Jesse, an IBEW electrician, sympathizes with communities negatively affected by data centers but does not believe the electricians building them should be blamed. In his view, opposition should instead be directed toward policymakers and the project approval process. “I think it’s ridiculous if, to build a data center or any kind of a business, you’re going to significantly impact the lives of that community in a negative way,” he told Wired.

An electrician named Dante echoed some of those sentiments, arguing that data center work is no more ethically compromised than many other commercial construction projects. “We’re almost always working for the worst possible people in the end, but we all need a paycheck,” he said. He added that such projects are “essentially the same kind of work,” typically performed for wealthy corporations seeking to become even richer.

Re: Is vice signaling the new virtue signaling?

By linear a • Score: 4, Informative Thread
Godwin’s law kicked in early on this thread.

Re: Is vice signaling the new virtue signaling?

By Misagon • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I would say that recent developments have made Godwin’s Law obsolete.

Not everyone can be enlightened

By argStyopa • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Let’s keep our focus on the people behind these projects, shall we? Not the caterers, the electricians, the plumbers, or the company that mows their lawn. They’re just trying to pay the bills man.

Yes, I get it, if it’s your holy mission to oppose AI datacenters sure, you go right ahead and chain yourself to the front gate. But the fact is that most people don’t have the luxury to morally evaluate their job for nuances of “whatever is bothering reddit today”.

Re:It’s the water: Re:Is vice signaling

By Jumperalex • Score: 4, Informative Thread

The answer is land cost, power access and cost, tax incentives, zoning. In no particular order.

Or said another way, until recently the impact of water-over-use was an external cost in the decision process. Just like power over-use was. Now they both are being factored into permitting requirements and that means cost have the costs finally.

By costs here I don’t mean the rates they negotiate for consumption of either water or power. I mean the cost of scaling production and distribution to prevent everyone else having to pay more because a data center was allowed to come in and spike demand without and investment in supply growth / demand efficiency.

Re:Just accel the move from Blue to Red states

By dfghjk • Score: 5, Informative Thread

There are no high paying jobs in data centers, just destruction of quality of life for locals. Perfect for red states, they are accustomed to being shit on, they vote for it.

Valve Prices the Steam Machine At $1,049

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Valve’s new Steam Machine will launch June 29 starting at $1,049 and go up from there depending on the configuration. Although it costs considerably more than the PS5 ($599.99) and Xbox Series X ($649.99), “the value proposition for the Steam Machine is that it can play your library of Steam games you may have accumulated over years (or even decades), rather than just PlayStation games, and it’s also a full Linux PC that you can customize to your heart’s content,” reports The Verge. “Valve also says that it’s selling the Steam Machine for the cost of its components alone instead of subsidizing the price.” From the report:
You can now register your interest to buy a Steam Machine as part of a reservation system. To offer a fair playing field for people who want to buy one, Valve will randomize everyone in the queue on Thursday at 1PM ET. After that, anyone who registers their interest will be added to the end of the waitlist. The first emails giving people the opportunity to buy will go out on June 29th.

Valve will sell four configurations of the Steam Machine:
- A 512GB model for $1,049
- A 512GB model with a bundled Steam Controller for $1,128
- A 2TB model for $1,349
- A 2TB model with a bundled Steam Controller for $1,428

Some people asks why I hate generative AI

By doragasu • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

But I have nothing else to say.

Re:Expesnive controller

By Himmy32 • Score: 5, Informative Thread

For comparison the Switch 2 joycons are $99.99 and the PS5 DualSense is $84.99.

When you think about all that’s jammed into them these days, Hall-effect/magnetic joysticks so there isn’t drift issues, touchpads, a battery, gyros, haptic feedback, and the microcontroller. It’s easier to understand why it costs a little more than a rectangle with a couple red buttons of yesteryear.

And why force people to buy a controller if they are going to just use mouse / keyboard or are happy buying a cheapo corded controller?

Re:Expesnive controller

By GoJays • Score: 4, Informative Thread
Pick up an 8BitDo wireless controller for $40 (CAD).

Ryzen/AMD 16/8GB

By bill_mcgonigle • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Skipping the paywalled article I found these specs and was underwhelmed.

Sure it looks fine for playing mid games but my guess was something unique, unified RAM or a clever bus or something. It seems like a decently tuned Ryzen build. I do like the lower TDP on the CPU which should be doing less work.

A nice form factor for those who don’t build their own.

Hopefully this is their entre into the PC world and v2 will have more innovations.

What’s most cool is the generation of teenagers who will have default Arch/KDE instead of default Windows.

An investment really

By CEC-P • Score: 5, Funny Thread
I heard that every single one comes with a signed statement from Sam Altman stating that it is 100% guaranteed to go up in price by 2029 or your money back!

AI Law Firm Wins UK Court Case For First Time

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Garfield AI, the UK’s first regulator-approved AI law firm, has won its first court case after helping a freelancer recover 7,000 pounds in unpaid fees. “I was owed money for work I had done, but it felt like the process of recovering it could be too stressful, expensive and time-consuming,” said Tamires Camal Taquidir, a freelancer who had provided HR-related services to a hospitality business. “Garfield made it possible for me to pursue the claim and keep going. When the counterclaim was brought, it was intended to intimidate me, but I knew I had accessible, cost-effective and competent support. I’m delighted by the result.” Computer Weekly reports:
After attempting to resolve a dispute over paid fees without court action, Camal Taquidir […] used Garfield AI to help her pursue the case in court. She was able to generate pre-action correspondence, and then prepare and issue court proceedings. The AI legal assistant conducted all of the legal work preceding the court trial. The defendant instructed solicitors and brought a counterclaim, which the claimant disputed with the support of Garfield AI.

The claimant continued to trial, including dealing with document production, the preparation witness statements and trial bundles. Garfield then instructed a junior, shortly before the trial began. She won the claim over unpaid fees following a three-hour trial at Wandsworth County Court. The claimant paid around 400 pounds in Garfield AI fees to recover the 7,000 pounds owed, while the defendant instructed both a solicitor and a barrister. […] Following a three-hour trial at Wandsworth County Court on 14 May 2026, in which both sides were represented by barristers, the court found in favor of the claimant, awarding 7,000 pounds and dismissing the counterclaim.

£400 total?

By algaeman • Score: 3 Thread
I understand that the AI fees are low, but how did they get a barrister in court for three hours for £400? Is there actually someone out there that is desperate for courtroom experience such that they will take a £100 an hour fee?

The law is made of words

By MpVpRb • Score: 3 Thread

LLMs are good with words
I suspect that LLMs will be very good at the law once their accuracy improves

AI Lawyers do their homework?

By argStyopa • Score: 3 Thread

If an LLM attorney is smart enough to actually check that the cases they reference actually exist, we can be confident than they’re better than a certain percent of human lawyers.

2,000 Retired Google Pixel Phones Get a Second Life As a Private Cloud

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
UC San Diego researchers are working with Google to build a private cloud from 2,000 retired Pixel Fold motherboards, demonstrating how discarded smartphones could provide useful, low-cost computing capacity. “The full smartphone cluster is expected to launch this fall,” reports The Register. “Depending on how well the initial phase goes, we’re told the cluster could grow even larger.” From the report
Once the phone’s motherboards have been extracted from their shells, the researchers say that the chips hiding within remain more than potent enough to be useful for a variety of tasks. In many cases, the single-threaded performance of these chips is as good as, if not better than, what you’d find from a many-cored datacenter chip. The Pixel Fold smartphones, which will form the basis of the cluster, are powered by a Google Tensor G2 processor with two 2.85 GHz Cortex-X1, two 2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 and four 1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 Arm cores, a Mali-G710 MP7 GPU, and 12 GB of system memory. Early benchmarking using the SPEC suite suggests that 25-50 phones should deliver performance similar to that of a conventional server.

The major challenge, instead, is distributing workloads across multiple devices, each of which has a handful of cores of one or more varieties, and most have 8-12 GB of memory. UCSD researchers are approaching this challenge from a couple of different angles. The first is by targeting applications that can easily fit within a single device. The second is using Kubernetes to orchestrate container deployments across clusters of 25-50 phones. For this to work, the devices first need to be flashed with a Linux operating system suitable for the job. While Android makes for a great handheld experience, it is not intended for server duty. In the blog post, researchers note that Android includes functionality intended to stop rogue applications from chewing up excessive amounts of memory and draining your battery. In server context, these safety mechanisms are no longer necessary.

[Ryan Kastner, an associate professor of computer science at UCSD] told us this was by no means an easy task, but the team has made steady progress toward getting Linux running smoothly on these devices, including support for the phone’s onboard GPUs. Access to some functionality, like the chip’s integrated tensor processing unit, remains elusive. Clustering these devices will require networking the phones together. Normally these devices would connect over cellular or Wi-Fi, but at this scale, this not only isn’t practical, but also has implications for security, he explained. Instead, the team will employ PCBs that both supply power and break out wired Ethernet networking.

The researchers suggest that many EdTech, grading, and research workloads commonly run by universities in the cloud are small enough to run on the cluster without issue. “The vast majority of these applications are within the capabilities of a single smartphone to host, with the standard grading backend running on small cloud instances,” a blog post detailing the planned deployment reads. “Early experiments show that even a moderately-sized cluster of 20 phones is capable of supporting peak submission rates for a 75+ student class.”

Memory prices

By gurps_npc • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Given that the price of memory is so high that cell phone production is dropping like a stone, it is clear to me that used cellphones will end up being worth a lot more - both for this kind of networked computing and merely to remove and reuse parts

Obligatory

By killmenow • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
Imagine a beowulf cluster…

Re:Obligatory

By rta • Score: 4, Funny Thread

Imagine a beowulf cluster…

came to say the same, but TFA DID imagine it!

and it’s some sort of /. crime that the line didn’t make it into TFS.

Alongside traditional IT applications, the cluster will also support exploration into parallel computing and systems programming, which sounds an awful lot like the smartphone equivalent of the Beowulf clusters of the ‘90s, which saw researchers cobble together supercomputers from consumer PCs.

Ubisoft Co-Founder Claude Guillemot Dies In Plane Crash

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from TechCrunch:
Claude Guillemot, co-founder of French video game company Ubisoft, died Friday at the age of 69. According to French media (via Bloomberg), Guillemot died in a plane crash in the French resort town of La Baule. He was one of two people aboard the plane, both of whom died.

Guillemot founded Ubisoft with his four brothers in 1986. Since then, the company has published the Assassin’s Creed, Far Cry, Prince of Persia, and Tom Clancy video game franchises, as well as many other titles. The family retains control of Ubisoft, and Guillemot’s brother Yves is still CEO. Guillemot was also chairman of Guillemot Corp., which makes gaming and audio accessories.
“Ubisoft was deeply saddened to learn of the death of Claude Guillemot, co-founder of the group and chairman of Guillemot Corp., in an accident,” Ubisoft said in a statement. “Our thoughts are with his family and loved ones during this difficult time. No further statements will be made at this time.”

Several US States Bet That AI Can Solve Their Prison Recidivism Crisis

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
America’s state prison systems need ways “to keep people from returning to prison,” reports the Wall Street Journal, “when an estimated 40% end up back behind bars within three years.”
Part of the problem comes in the form of filing cabinets, manila folders and legacy digital databases. In other words, records for a single prisoner might be kept in a dozen places… Now a group of 19 prison systems are tackling the problem with digital tools and artificial intelligence in some cases. They are contracting with San Francisco nonprofit Recidiviz, whose computer systems bring together prisoner data from its disparate sources into digital dashboards. From there, corrections staff can see information — such as court records and notes from parole-board hearings — about a prisoner or parolee all in one place.

The company says its efforts are working: Recidivism has fallen 16% in the prison population its systems track. It is the result of “just streamlining these workflows and knitting someone’s journey together end to end,” says Clementine Jacoby, chief executive officer of Recidiviz. Some criminal-justice groups show that recidivism is trending downward in general, though most of that data is nearly a decade old… The statistics from 11 states stop at 2019, and for four states stop at 2016. With 10 other states, no data was reported.

We know how, just don’t want to.

By gurps_npc • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

The nordic prison system has a recidivism rate is 20% within the first 2 years and about 25% within 5 years. The US system is 39% within 3 years.

Why don’t we use something closer to Norways?

Because the Conservatives call it ‘soft on crime’. They have 3 levels of prison: High, Low and Transition. The Low Security prison they use for non-violent first time offenders is what the GOP calls a ‘country club’ type with private rooms, lots of classes, library and therapy.

You only get their High Security if you were violent or become violent in the Low Security prison.

They also have a half way house/ transition system where they live in a prison but are allowed to go to work outside.

But this is clearly not “Hard on Crime”, so Americans refuse to use it.

Note, in my opinion the “Hard on Crime” approach fails because normal prison is hard on crime so when someone claims to be Hard on Crime, what they end up doing is:

1) Push Judges and Police to be hard on SUSPECTS, resulting in more false accusations and more time in Jail waiting for a trial - both of which encourage people to commit more crimes.

2) Push newbie criminals to make friends in jail with the criminals as the guards are cruel and dismissive of the prisoner’s concerns.

3) Prevent criminals from getting training and other resources they need while in prison, resulting in a much harder time getting out of the criminal life.

Re:Betteidge’s law

By lucifuge31337 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
There’s also another thing at play for the ones who would be otherwise redeemable: most prisons are hellholes of punishment, not rehabilitation. If you choose to run a system that way do not be surprised that the likely outcome of people who have been in the system for any real lengh of time is recidivism.

Re:ok cool

By SumDog • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
I think the idea is identifying people most likely to succeeded and get them out. This makes slightly more sense for LLMs, if you’re just talking about reading a lot of public data for people who have no right to privacy anyway due to the harm they caused others.

16% sounds pretty low, but it’s probably reasonable. There are a lot of people in prison who can’t be let out. I’m sorry, you stab someone, the chance of rehabilitation is very low. If they get 20 years, they need to stay in 20 years. Maybe they’ll be too old to hurt anyone then, or the time will make them realize how shit they are. Most often a lot, they’ll commit a violent crime again and then won’t get out ever. I think of this tragic case of a woman who befriended her mom’s killer and was then murdered by him after she helped him get parole:

https://people.com/crime/ark-w…

There is a kind of suicidal empathy in wanting to help everyone on the street or in the prison system. It denies the realize that for over half the people on the street, they have literally fucked over all their friends, all their family members and anyone who could possibly help them. Their friends are now others on the street who have done the same. Some people don’t get in the loop. One of my best friends is a court reporter, and despite all the awful stuff she has to record, she also sees people who come into the court room, cleaned up, their lives turned around and coming off probation. So people can turn around their lives, but they have to want it.

I’m just glad this article wasn’t about trying to use AI chatbots to directly change behavior of inmates. That would just be straight up AI-psychosis talk.

Re:We know how, just don’t want to.

By torkus • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Get back to me when places like NY and CA stop letting repeat violent offenders out on ‘cashless’ bail.

If you’re accused of assaulting someone for the 2nd (or 3rd and more) time before your first case even makes it to court, you should not be free to continue your rampage.

Equally, we should not make any conviction a lifetime sentence of un-/under-employment. People need the ability to rejoin society and a normal, productive person who made a mistake.

Lastly, when a significant portion of the money spent on prisons is going to corporate profits, we are doing something very very wrong. It’s a race to the bottom for everyone but the shareholders.

Re:We know how, just don’t want to.

By gurps_npc • Score: 5, Informative Thread

1) You have been tricked by conservative propaganda. Cashless bail did not increase the rate of crime as compared to cash bail.

2) NY law (and NJ and Illinois) explicitly refused to release violent offenders on cashless bail. California does NOT have a cashless bail law, but the state supreme court has encouraged judges to set cashless bail for non-violent offenders. Both states have explicit language about non-violent only..

3) There were cases when people arrested for non-violent crimes were released on bail and then committed violent offense. There were also cases where the legal definition of violent offenders were … arguable. But the law said no violent offenders could be released and that law was followed.

4) The real question is, do you think poor people should have no rights and upon being arrested should have to wait in jail for a year or more just because they are poor? You do realize that this will a) cause innocent people to plead guilty to a crime they did not commit if it means they get out of jail in 6 months rather than waiting there a year before they go to trial. b) will destroy their lives even if they are found innocent because a year in jail awaiting trial means they lose their job, house, girlfriend/wife, all while getting assaulted by real criminals, trained by real criminals on how to commit crime and finally JOIN criminal gangs to survive.

5) If you release more people on bail, the number of crimes go up, obviously. This does not mean cashless bail is a bad idea or causing a problem. The question is not whether cashless bail releases commit crimes, but instead Whether people released on cashless bail commit more crimes than people released on cash bail. The answer to that is no. People released on cashless bail are no more likely to commit more crimes than people released on cash bail. The number is about 17% of people released - for both cash bail and cashless bail.

6) If you think the bail system in general is too lenient, you have a better argument, given that 17% commit more crimes.

7) However the real problem is the time spent in jail before trial. Justice should happen in less than 3 months, not more than 12.

8) Cashless bail for non-violent offenders reduces the number of people that end up becoming hardened criminals. That has been proven repeatedly.

9)Most importantly states with cashless bail have LOWER crime rates than states that require cash bail.

There is no way us liberals from NJ (217 violent crimes per 100,000), Illinois (218/100k), and NY (380/100k) are going to follow the advice of idiots from Texas (389/100k), Missouri (462/100k) or Louisiana (519/100k).

NJ and Illinois are just too good at crime prevention to care what the conservatives say. NY (and California) are middle of the pack and might listen, but not likely when idiots talk dumb shit and make up lies.

‘Tutor’ Who Took Online Tests for 124 Students Jailed for Three Years

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
A private tutor who charged money to take dozens of exams for students and submit coursework for them “has been jailed for three years,” reports the BBC, “after his scam earned him £300,000.”
Shahid Adnan completed assignments and online tests for more than 120 students at Liverpool John Moore’s University, the Crown Prosecution Service said. The 43-year-old, of Lysander Close, Liverpool, was caught in February 2023 after a student handed in a USB drive containing suspicious coursework to Dr Tom Berry of the university’s school of computer science and mathematics. Berry’s checks revealed the drive was used by Adnan with documents linked to a company he set up called Study Sharp Ltd.

Excel spreadsheets containing details of other students, their study modules, coursework due dates, and their personal login credentials were also found. Further checks confirmed suspicions that Adnan was accessing the university’s network to submit fraudulent work and sit examinations on behalf of students… [I]nvestigations led police to believe Adnan may have been doing work for 124 students at universities all over the world.
The BBC also interviewed detective sergeant Adam Dagnall from Merseyside Police’s cybercrime unit, who said Adnan was living a lavish lifestyle “well beyond” his stated occupations as a private tutor and Amazon delivery driver. His bank accounts held more than £2m ($2,645,100 USD).

Re:Does this mean Sam Altman’s going to prison?

By gijoel • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Not really, cheating on exams can tarnish academic integrity and is a menace to society at large. Do you want to have heart surgery performed by someone who didn’t know their shit, and cheated on their exams? Do you want to drive over a bridge design by a guy who doesn’t understand structural analysis, or be represented by someone who faked their way through law school?

Besides which academic reputation is worth a lot to university and colleges, and they know it. If they didn’t stomp on this now their reputation will turn to shit, and no one will want to enroll there. That can have a big impact on enrollment numbers and by extension their bottom line.

Lastly, why the fuck should someone too lazy to do the work do as well as or better than someone who busted their balls studying for those subjects?

Why is a person at university?

By Bruce66423 • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

The ideal answer is that the person is really interested in the subject they are studying and want to know a lot more.

The honest answer is that society forces them to go to university as the next step towards a high paying job. The fact that it’s also a chance to PARTY is probably also significant!

For the person whose only motivation is the latter, then the logic of cheating is overwhelming; they don’t really believe that they need the stuff they are being taught, so why bother to play nicely?

The AI challenge, on top of the pandemic’s revelation that an awful lot can be done on line, is raising all these hard questions which nobody wants to face. However to some extent it is merely clarifying the questions which were already being raised about the degree to which a university education has become a weapon in the arms race of getting the first job. Once you start to see the university industry as arms salesmen in a war, it’s a lot easier to disregard their self serving claims to be making a meaningful contribution to our culture. Of course SOME are doing things of value - especially in STEM - but overall?

Perhaps the answer is for major companies to announce that they are going to recruit high school graduates with good SATs results for in house apprenticeships that will lead to management. Unfortunately most seem to be continuing to use a degree as the first jump for candidates to get over…

Re:Does this mean Sam Altman’s going to prison?

By dargaud • Score: 5, Informative Thread

[…] Do you want to have heart surgery performed by someone who didn’t know their shit, and cheated on their exams? Do you want to drive over a bridge design by a guy who doesn’t understand structural analysis, or be represented by someone who faked their way through law school? […]

Indeed. It is a well known ‘secret’ that other student(s) took Trumps’ finals in his place, paid for by his father. The world would be a much better place if this particular scam hadn’t happened. Here on finals they check your identity papers (real ones, not an easily fakeable driver’s license).

Re:Does this mean Sam Altman’s going to prison?

By geekmux • Score: 4 Thread

Have you watched the TV series “The Audacity” wherein the Silicon Valley founder protagonist tells his daughter about getting into Stanford, “Cheaters don’t lose and losers don’t cheat”?

Was that before or after the after-school special starring Mossimo Giannulli telling the story of how he got ass-raped in prison for the crime of lying on college entrance exams and paying for a rowing scholarship?

Maybe we should ask the felon wife actress who doesn’t act anymore about stories that end appropriately.

Consequences?

By GeekWithAKnife • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
Are the people that had achieved degrees and other certification in a fraudulent fashion going to be stripped of those and potentially fired or expelled?

This is not an isolated incident and there have been many stories of people achieving via fraudulent means and consequently we are all worse off for it. IMO they need to be named and shamed. Stripped of whatever they gained by cheating.

Many years ago we had a new guy with a Masters in networking. Didn’t know what are the network ranges for class A, B or C were. Couldn’t say what the difference is between TCP & UDP. Had no idea about subnetting etc etc. His masters seemed more related to social networking.

Ultimately an individual that gets certified or qualified in a fraudulent fashion is genuinely cheating themselves. They always run the risk of ventually getting found out and sometimes in very embarrassing fashion.

P.S. - we trained LLMs on human data…is it a wonder why they are sometimes dishonest?

TikTok Shows 3x More AI Slop Than YouTube, Report Finds

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“About 59% of TikTok videos served to a new account’s For You feed are AI slop,” writes Search Engine Journal, “according to a report from Kapwing, the video creation tool company. That’s roughly three times the rate Kapwing found on YouTube.”
The company manually reviewed over 10,000 TikTok videos across 20 categories and ran a separate fresh-account test, counting AI-generated content in the first 500 For You videos. Kapwing ran the same fresh-account test on YouTube and found that 104 of the first 500 Shorts, or 21%, were AI slop. On TikTok, 294 of 500 For You videos hit that threshold…

Of the 2,000 videos Kapwing reviewed in TikTok’s Kids category, 57% were AI slop. That was the highest rate of any category in the analysis. The highest-rate tag was #cartoonkids, where 97 of 100 featured videos were AI-generated. Tags like #cartoons and #babysong both reached 83%, and #forkids came in at 79%. After Kids, the next highest AI slop rates were in Science and Education (35%), Health (33%), and History (33%). All three are categories where visual illustration and voiceover narration make up much of the content.

On the other end, categories where on-camera presence or physical demonstration are central had the lowest rates. Fashion came in at 1.3%, Music at 1.5%, and Fitness at 1.6%.
The article notes that by last November, TikTok “had already labeled 1.3 billion videos as AI-generated, according to the report.”

Must be mostly slop then

By caseih • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Because Youtube is about half AI slop these days. At least given the kinds of video topics I might be interested in. It’s kind of discouraging. Some of them actually are now marked as AI generated. I generally stop watching channels that I find or suspect are AI, even if the material appears to be accurate. I just can’t support creators who don’t actually create.

Is this a surprise?

By jenningsthecat • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I’ve never experienced TikTok; but everything I’ve heard leads me to believe that even before AI became so pervasive,` the platform had way, way more slop than YouTube. Presumably, a greater affinity for slop in general implies a greater incidence of AI slop.

I just checked TikTok - they right

By TheMiddleRoad • Score: 3 Thread
TikTok indeed is a shithole with a lot of AI slop, way more than I ever run into on YouTube. A whole lot of uncanny valley shit, and a lot of shit past that into more believable quality, but still AI.

TikTok was already Slop !!!

By bsdetector101 • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
Hard to say that AI slop made it worse !!!

Doesn’t TikTok Basically Demand You Post Slop?

By jhuebel • Score: 3 Thread

I mean, it’s built on the idea of creating very short form videos. With the advent of 10-second AI video generation, TikTok is basically the perfect fit for it. Someone can just keep feeding AI prompts and indiscriminately posting the resulting videos. There’s almost zero thought process required. But if some of the videos hit… profit! There’s no downside for the AI slop factory.

Someone Forked systemd Over Its New Birth Date Field

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
The blog Linuxiac reports:
A new systemd fork has appeared with a specific purpose: removing systemd’s recently added support for storing a user’s birth date in JSON user records.

The fork, called Liberated systemd, published its first tagged release as v261 shortly after the official systemd 261 release. In other words, the fork follows upstream systemd while reverting the change that added the new optional birthDate field.

Importantly, this is not a new init system, a wider redesign of systemd, or a general-purpose alternative to the upstream project. Its stated purpose is to remain close to upstream systemd while removing what the author describes as “surveillance enablement”… The author recommends testing the fork in a virtual machine before using it on real hardware and warns nightly builds are more likely to be unstable than named releases.

Re:Give my my SysVInit

By TaliesinWI • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Uh-huh. So what happens if you run one of the “modules” by itself, like you can do with other Unix/Linux programs?

Re:Does systemd want to wish us happy birthday now

By phantomfive • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
It’s possible the systemd team sees the field as a way to make their software more “sticky.” If the data gets stored by systemd, then systemd because a little harder to remove.

That is a horrible development strategy for good software, but it does make the software more likely to remain. The Darwinistic incentive is there for enshittification.

Re:Give my my SysVInit

By phantomfive • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Further to that systemd is highly modular. Most of it does not run in PID 1. On my fedora system there are half a dozen individual systemd module packages that can be used or not as the system needs and is designed. systemd is not at all monolithic.

The only people who say that haven’t actually looked at the source code, or are liars. I don’t know which one you are.

At least you didn’t say “Systemd is small”, which it isn’t.

Re:You’ll end up with an empty repository

By sinkskinkshrieks • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
systemd is what happens when a young, arrogant engineer whom tech bloggers decided was a digiterti prophet inflicts the antipattern of reinventing everything and ignoring conventions and standards imposing unreasonable costs on end-users for ego purposes. But look at all of the benefits and pretend none of the downsides exist!

Re: You’ll end up with an empty repository

By DarkOx • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Here is the thing both parts are true.

Systemd really does suck. It is a lot of attack surface, it makes a lot of things that would be enjoy some security or at least blast radius control thru heterogeneity systemic risks. It turns a lot of simple failures into complex nightmares that are difficult to untangle. It offers no discoverablity, if you don’t know how the hip bone is connected to tailbone you are not getting there by looking around the system you’ll have to read the docs.

90+ % of what it does was already handled just fine by existing solutions. So for all of those bloggers systemd has a zero value proposition. All suck no blow.

However....

If you trying to run 1000s of containers at scale with piles of micro services on each, actually systemd does give you some useful things. If you are are PaaS platform and you want to support a wide variety of work loads and make them controllable thur you management portals etc, well having some similar OS level control plane for your control plane tools to plug into is kinda of big deal, because otherwise you are looking at specialized code for each OS and maybe each version of OS you want to offer support for.

Instead we get this dynamic, one distro picks up systemD, the PaaS guys pick it up and say hey cool we will support systemD and tell the other distros get with the program or be left behind.

So bloggers are right if you are managing handfuls of servers the old fashion way via ssh, or just admining your own workstation - SystemD SUCKS

If you are some SiValley tech bro looking to piss away a few million VC dollars, systemD or something like it is a necessity and uniformity and adoption level is a way more important than it being any good. It is just the latest iteration of nobody ever got fired choosing IBM, exact same thinking and underlying justifications.

The Secret Revolution in Battery Technology: 3-D Printing

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“There’s a revolution in battery technology hiding in plain sight,” reports The Wall Street Journal. “The 3-D printing of batteries has the potential to put energy storage inside any device.

“This will enable lightweight and long-lasting consumer gadgets, long-range military drones and even nanoscale robots.”
Almost all the innovations we regularly hear about — from cheaper, tougher electric-vehicle batteries to "Holy Grail” solid-state batteries — are about changing the chemistry of batteries. The promise of battery-tech 3-D printing (aka additive manufacturing) is simple: What if batteries could fill any available space, even structural elements of our gadgets, rather than always taking a rigid shape like a pouch or cylinder?

The new approach has obvious appeal. The entire airframe of a drone could be filled with energy storage for increased range. Smartglasses could have sleek battery-packed frames, so they look like everyday eyewear rather than “Revenge of the Nerds” props. One of the biggest advantages of 3-D printing is that it works with any battery, regardless of its cell chemistry. It could advance today’s lithium-ion as well as emerging sodium-ion and solid-state tech… Some [startups] are trying to use 3-D printing to create efficiencies in existing battery manufacturing systems. A brave handful of startups are pursuing radical new designs and approaches. They’re starting with defense applications, where cost and scale are less of an issue…

At Silicon Valley-based Sakuu… [r]ather than trying to 3-D-print whole batteries, the company is working on replacing one of battery manufacturing’s biggest pain points, says Arwed Niestroj, Sakuu’s chief operating officer, who is also a nuclear physicist and former head of Mercedes-Benz Research & Development North America. Existing battery assembly lines include football-field-long ovens for drying layers of material that have been dissolved in solvents. This requires a huge amount of energy and is a significant contributor to manufacturing costs, a big reason EV batteries aren’t cheaper. Sakuu’s process, under development for years, uses additive manufacturing to lay down key battery components without solvents, eliminating the need for ovens, says Niestroj.

Sakuu is currently working to commercialize this tech with a major battery manufacturer…

drone battery size

By phantomfive • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The entire airframe of a drone could be filled with energy storage for increased range.

Aren’t drone ranges largely limited by weight instead of battery storage space?

Well, that’s convenient

By Krishnoid • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
So when the battery dies, you can throw the whole device away!

Re:drone battery size

By dinfinity • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Aren’t drone ranges largely limited by weight instead of battery storage space?

Generally, yes. It may make some sense for aerodynamic winged drones, but those generally just use some type of gasoline / jet fuel.
It could make sense for race or other high speed drones like interceptors, where aerodynamic drag is a big factor.

For consumer electronics the legal requirement that batteries must be user replaceable renders this idea dead in the water in the entire EU.

Re:Well, that’s convenient

By markdavis • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

>“So when the battery dies, you can throw the whole device away!”

Indeed. And then it is also extremely difficult to try and recover the battery for recycling, as well, I assume.

So these devices become toxic, non-reusable, non-fixable, highly flammable, dangerous messes.

Late to the party

By labnet • Score: 3 Thread

Tesla has already solved the

Existing battery assembly lines include football-field-long ovens for drying layers of material that have been dissolved in solvents.

problem and now using dry process for anode and cathode at scale with their 4680 cells.

Is Tesla Planning To Sell Modular AI Data Center Hardware?

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot
Electrek reports:
Tesla wants to sell modular AI data center hardware, according to a new trademark application for a product called “Megapod.” The filing describes a complete, self-contained computing system for AI workloads…

Tesla filed the “Megapod” trademark (serial number 99893717) with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office this month, through its longtime IP counsel. It’s an intent-to-use application, meaning Tesla is claiming the name for a product it hasn’t launched yet. The goods-and-services description is unusually specific for a trademark. Megapod covers “modular data center hardware systems for artificial intelligence computing, comprised of computer servers, computer hardware for artificial intelligence data processing, networking equipment, power distribution units, and cooling systems.” It also covers “self-contained modular computing hardware systems for artificial intelligence workloads,” integrated platforms sold as a single unit — an enclosure bundling compute, power distribution, and cooling — and downloadable software to monitor, manage, and optimize those systems.

In plain terms: Tesla wants to sell a turnkey AI data center building block. Not a battery, not a chip on its own, but the full rack-and-room of servers, networking, power, and cooling that AI training and inference run on.
Tesla’s offering would have to compete with Nvidia’s liquid-cooled, rack-scale systems that simulates a giant GPU, the article points out. But “The bigger issue is that Tesla has no merchant compute-hardware business to build on.”
Tesla’s own AI training cluster, Cortex at Gigafactory Texas, runs on roughly 67,000 Nvidia H100-equivalent GPUs. In other words, Tesla is one of Nvidia’s customers, not a competitor selling alternative hardware… Where Tesla does have a real AI-data-center business is power, not compute. Its Megapack and new Megablock energy storage products are selling into AI data centers as grid buffers — Musk’s own xAI has bought roughly $1 billion of Megapacks to keep its training runs powered. That energy-storage strength is the one credible thread here. A Megapod that bundles Tesla’s power electronics, thermal management, and the enclosure — the “shell” around the chips rather than the chips themselves — would at least sit adjacent to a business Tesla actually runs.

Pivot!!!

By locater16 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Our current business model is losing it’s massively overvalued hype machine aura, stock holders are starting to ask questions about “finances” and “profits”, pivot to the newest hype bullshit before we have to answer for anything!

Foundry business

By Tailhook • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Not surprising. Tesla is its 5th generation (AI5) processor, currently manufactured by Samsung and TSMC. I suppose they imagine there are others that will want to use these for their own purposes. Musk is creating his own supply of chips for SpaceX at his TX Terafab. Having terrestrial customers to absorb some of the supply and provide revenue as that ramps up the obvious thing to do.

No.

By rsilvergun • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Betteridge strikes again.

Muskrat bought a bunch of gpus before the AI bubble really got going because he was preemptively pumping the SpaceX stock by shouting look at me I’m buying all this computer hardware for my AI so you know I’m going to make you rich!

He never did anything with any of it because that wasn’t the point. He wasn’t building data centers he was scamming investors.

Now he’s got stacks and stacks of gpus sitting around gathering dust and to keep the stock price pumped for the time being he needs to make it look like he’s going to have a ton of revenue coming in. In practice he’s not and he’s just going to steal all your 401K money but we’re going to get bullshit articles like this because anyone who does real journalism like Patrick Boyle over on YouTube gets fired or demonetized.

If you watch the most recent video from Patrick Boyle and go to the end of the video he explains how the scam works. Initially investors get murdered in by the promise of big fat returns but they can’t sell the stock for the first 120 days as part of the buying agreement. Just one of those investors are at the point where they can sell the stock and it’s likely to crash the rule changes to NASDAQ for SpaceX stock into safe index funds.

Your 401k will be forced to purchase SpaceX stock for the index funds that were the otherwise be safe investments. You will not have the option of not buying SpaceX stock. Eventually your 401k will be full of SpaceX stock and a variety of other rotten AI bullshit stocks that will collapse eliminating the value of your retirement savings.

When this happens the people who saw it coming will still be screwed because there’s nothing they could do about it because the people who didn’t see it coming refused to vote for the kind of reforms that are needed. It doesn’t matter if you realize you’re a crab in a bucket you’re still a crab and a bucket and they’re going to drag you back down every time you try to get out.

There is 10 trillion dollars in 401ks. If you think the thieves that have already created 1 trillionaire are going to stop and leave that money sitting there you’re nuts. That money belongs to them not you. You gave it to them when you kept voting for culture War bullshit instead of boring annoying people like senator Warren who know how to regulate Wall Street