Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Rogue Police Officers Have Turned Flock’s Nationwide Camera Network Into a Stalking Tool
  2. GOG Officially Expands Linux Support With Native Galaxy Client In Development
  3. IT Teams are Spending 11 Hours a Week on Cloud Connectivity Problems
  4. New Spinning Drone Hides In Plain Sight
  5. Is There a Way to Promote Open Document Formats Instead of ‘MS Office’ Format?
  6. Steam On Linux Use Back Above 4% In July
  7. Group of Teen Hikers Relied on Google Maps. It Was a Disaster.
  8. Does Eating Less Protein Produce Healthier Aging and Metabolism?
  9. In a First, ‘Super-Earth’ Planet Shows It Could Have an Atmosphere
  10. Linux Desktop Market Share Surpasses 10% in North America
  11. Are Return-to-Office Mandates Killing Workers’ Trust in Workplaces?
  12. As New York Finalizes New Social Media Rules, US Senate Considers Nationwide ‘SCREEN’ Act
  13. How ‘Situational Awareness’ Hedge Fund Dropped 67% in AI Stock Rout
  14. Recovery Seeds Reportedly Breached for Coldcard Hardware Bitcoin Wallets, $75M Taken
  15. Is Big Tech’s AI Gamble Starting to Look Riskier?

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Rogue Police Officers Have Turned Flock’s Nationwide Camera Network Into a Stalking Tool

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
A woman found her police officer ex-boyfriend cop had used Flock’s camera system 600 times to look up the location of her and her daughter, reports the Washington Post (Alternate URL here). (She found out through Have I Been Flocked, described as “a website that aggregates police search logs made available through public records.”)

But it turns out dozens more police officers have also misused Flock…
Authorities have charged or accused at least 50 law-enforcement officers of using license-plate readers for unauthorized purposes, including to stalk women without their knowledge or consent, a Post analysis of police and court records found. In 26 of these cases, police investigators and prosecutors said the officers used the technology to spy on their wives, their girlfriends, their exes, their exes’ new partners or women they wanted to meet. In other cases, police or prosecutors have not specified the alleged surveillance targets. Flock’s system was used in 46 of the cases analyzed by The Post, while the other cases involved competing products…

After The Post relayed its findings to Flock, the company said in a statement it “will soon be announcing better filters and tools to stop abuse before it happens....” In April, the company rolled out a new voluntary “audit assistance” feature, which agencies can choose to enable, that automatically scans officers’ searches for suspicious activity, such as queries repeatedly targeting the same vehicle or run by officers off the clock. In an interview with The Post, Flock chief executive Garrett Langley said misuse of its systems is inevitable and that the company is focused on providing tools to catch perpetrators after the fact… “We’re not going to change humans, and humans make bad decisions,” Langley said. “What we can do is make sure that they know if you use this tool, you will be held accountable....”

Through automated license-plate reader systems, or ALPRs, officers could trace the rhythms and travels of their subjects’ daily lives, leading in some instances to violent confrontations, moments of psychological manipulation, and threats of coercion and control, the analysis found.

- In Wisconsin, a police officer allegedly used Flock to check whether his ex-girlfriend had gone to an abortion clinic, according to a police affidavit for a case set for trial this month.

- In Kansas, a police chief who tracked his ex through Flock sneaked up on her while she was intimate with another man, a state police certification body alleged, leading to his firing.

- In Florida, a deputy speeding to stop a young actress he’d added to a watch list for a license-plate tool called Guardian nearly caused a head-on crash, according to a police report and video from his dashboard camera. The deputy was arrested in March, and his attorney declined to comment.

- And in California, prosecutors said a former deputy, Alexander Vanny, used Flock as part of a months-long campaign of “stalking” and “humiliating” his former fiancée that also involved following her around town and installing a hidden camera in her roommate’s bathroom, according to a sentencing brief…

While some of the searches resulted in officers’ firings, prosecutions and prison sentences, police departments in other cases allowed officers to continue using the systems even after receiving warnings that they were being misused… An array of privacy advocates has argued that Flock could deter bad actors by making simple changes to its product, such as requiring officers to label every search with a criminal case number. Some policing experts also warned that agencies’ inconsistencies in developing and enforcing standard procedures for license-plate readers could lead to further misconduct. With no federal laws governing use and only a patchwork of state laws, many of the country’s roughly 18,000 police agencies are left to decide their rules on their own…

Langley, Flock’s chief, has dismissed pushes by activists for the company to further limit how officers use its product. “No one elected me the police chief of America,” he told Forbes last year, adding, “I don’t think it’s our job to police the police.”
The Post also got this quote from an officer was fired and sentenced to probation after pleading no contest to charges of computer-system misuse, stalking and battery. “Pretty much everybody uses that computer system” improperly in the department, he said, and “they don’t audit it [nearly] as much as they should.”

Flock told The Post it now has over 120,000 cameras in more than 6,000 communities, recording 20 billion license plate scans every month.

The high cost of training police

By rsilvergun • Score: 3 Thread
Largely due to corruption means they’re basically untouchable. It doesn’t matter if you get caught doing something hideously illegal another subdivision of your city will hire you because they don’t want to have to spend the money training somebody else.

GOG Officially Expands Linux Support With Native Galaxy Client In Development

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Long-time Slashdot reader pyroclast shared this report from Linux Journal:
After years of requests from the Linux gaming community, GOG has officially confirmed that it is developing native Linux support for the GOG Galaxy launcher. The announcement marks one of the biggest shifts in the company’s history and signals a stronger commitment to Linux as a first-class gaming platform. While GOG has offered DRM-free Linux game downloads since 2014, its Galaxy launcher has remained exclusive to Windows and macOS — until now. Although the company has not announced a release date, GOG says Linux has become a major area of investment, with development already underway…

Unlike the web-based game downloads that Linux users already have access to, GOG Galaxy serves as a full-featured game management application. The launcher currently offers features including:

— Automatic game installation and updates
— Cloud save synchronization
— Achievement tracking
— Playtime statistics
— Game library organization
— Integrated storefront browsing
— Friends lists and social features
— Cross-platform launcher integration

Today, Linux users typically access these capabilities through community projects such as Heroic Games Launcher, Lutris, or Bottles. A native Galaxy client would provide an officially supported alternative with direct integration into GOG’s ecosystem…

For GOG, supporting Linux more fully aligns with its philosophy of giving users greater control over their purchased games.
The article argues this news shows Linux growing in importance for game publishers. After the rapid adoption of Valve’s Steam Deck, there’s also been continuous improvements to Proton and Vulkan, increasing hardware compatibility, and native Linux game development efforts.

“As more companies recognize the platform’s growth, Linux users can expect broader support from game publishers and software developers alike.”

That’s cool

By OrangeTide • Score: 3 Thread

I’m glad they’re supporting Linux even more now. There aren’t a lot of us but maybe with Microsoft constantly making their OS worse, some more converts will show up.

The thing is, I don’t really use GOG Galaxy because the big value add for me is that I can download and install games to run off line. And admittedly this is what GOG Galaxy does in the background (and it will even backup the installer and fetch bonus content if you want it to). But I don’t necessarily need galaxy to run my games, as the installer already does a nice job putting it under my desktop’s menu and I can browse or search for games.

Where Steam’s app is ahead is that it has better integration with friends lists and makes it easier to invite your friends into a game. It’s not that huge of a deal because Discord can already do some of that on Linux today if you grant it permissions necessary for it to track what game you’re playing.

IT Teams are Spending 11 Hours a Week on Cloud Connectivity Problems

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Researchers found enterprises are spending time troubleshooting cloud connectivity due to increased AI workloads, reports Computer Weekly. More than 400 IT and infrastructure decision-makers (US and UK) were surveyed for internet/cloud/AI exchange operator DE-CIX by market researchers Censuswide. But despite 96% of respondents claiming their enterprise networks are ready for cloud/AI loads, the average IT team still spends more than 11 hours each week resolving cloud connectivity problems
Other leading concerns included downtime or reliability issues (26%), latency or slow performance (28%), and security vulnerabilities/DDoS attacks (27%). Cost of connectivity, staff expertise and lack of visibility/control over data flows were also cited as major challenges… As a result, as indicated in the study, many businesses are now turning to private interconnection, which enables enterprises to connect directly to cloud providers over dedicated infrastructure rather than routing traffic across the public Internet. Designed to deliver lower latency, greater resilience, enhanced security and more predictable performance, private interconnection has become an increasingly important way of supporting modern cloud and AI workloads. Specifically, the data showed that 61% of companies are already using private connectivity to clouds, while another 31% are actively considering it… [And 71% of enterprises with 1000 or more employees]

Only 8.62% of the smaller companies were spending 21 to 40 hours per week dealing with connectivity issues, while just 2.53% of the largest companies in the sample do. Summing up these findings, DE-CIX said that together they suggest direct interconnection is rapidly becoming a core component of enterprise cloud and AI infrastructure and a competitive advantage for companies, though optimising interconnection strategies clearly remains a pressing challenge for small and medium-sized enterprises… “Every AI application depends on data moving quickly, securely and predictably between users, clouds and AI infrastructure. Our research suggests that far too many enterprises are still spending valuable time trying to maintain that kind of connectivity, with more than a third spending between 11 and 20 hours per week, and just under one in 10 spending between 21 to 40 hours per week. This confirms what we already knew — that that network architecture can make or break AI adoption.”
Elsewhere The Register reports that cloud infrastructure services “grew at their fastest for eight years during the second quarter of 2026, thanks to the AI craze and continued demand for flexible and scalable IT infrastructure.”
According to the latest figures from Synergy Research, enterprise spending on cloud infrastructure passed $143 billion in Q2, a year-on-year growth rate of 43 percent. This followed 11 successive quarters of increasing growth rates, during which the market has now doubled in size… “AI has, of course, driven most of that incremental growth, and we now see year-on-year growth rates of 165 percent for AI-specific cloud services....” And the top three global players continue to dominate the market, with Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft Azure and Google Cloud together accounting for 67 percent of all the cloud revenue during the quarter. That percentage has increased since the third quarter of last year, when the triumvirate made up 63 percent of enterprise cloud infra spending.

Parsing

By Kunedog • Score: 3 Thread
What was the headline supposed be? At first I thought they left out a hyphen, so there were 11-hour outages:

IT Teams Report 11 Hour a Week on-Cloud Connectivity Problems

But no, the teams are talking about hosting clouds themselves, so they really just got the plural wrong:

IT Teams Report Spending 11 Hours a Week on Cloud Connectivity Problems

I think by convention (if not by definition) I should expect to understand the headline without reading further.

I think a word was out of the title.

By TigerPlish • Score: 3 Thread

It’s hard to parse sentences some of the words are.

Do not the cat.

New Spinning Drone Hides In Plain Sight

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
To design invisible drones, researchers have tried camouflage, transparent materials and light-bending optical systems. But engineers at Northwestern University used “motion blur,” which an announcement from the school notes is the effect that makes fast-spinning fans seem to disappear.

“The drone spins up to 25 times per second, which is too fast for the human eye to see clearly. While it isn’t completely invisible, it morphs into a ghostly smudge that seamlessly blends into the background… "
To design the drone, the Northwestern team first used a computational model to generate roughly 20,000 drone configurations capable of stable flight. Then, they used artificial intelligence (AI) and optimization algorithms to repeatedly rearrange the drones’ major components, including a motor, propeller, circuit board, counterweight and batteries. After sifting through many different configurations, the algorithms determined the ideal placement of the drone’s components to minimize its visibility from virtually every viewing angle while allowing for stable flight.

After selecting promising candidates, the engineers simulated each drone spinning in flight and overlaid those images a hundred real-world backgrounds. Then, they used a perception model that approximates human vision to determine how noticeable each design appeared. Designs that blended into their surroundings received lower visibility scores. The team selected the 500 lowest-scoring designs and applied the optimization algorithm, which repeatedly adjusted the positions of components to further minimize those scores. “The design process was fully automated,” [said Northwestern’s associate CS professor Michael Rubenstein, who led the work]. “Then, when we were confident that a drone met all our criteria, we built it.”
They’ve named the drone “Phantom Twist”,” and plan to design future iterations with more transparent materials or quieter propulsion to make it even less noticeable.

The Northwestern team presented the work on July 16 at Robotics: Science and Systems 2026 in Sydney, Australia…

Thanks to long-time Slashdot reader fahrbot-bot for sharing the news.

25 x per sec

By rossdee • Score: 3 Thread

how does it see out?

And the world keeps getting scarier

By sarren1901 • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

n/a

Re: 25 x per sec

By liqu1d • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
Silly idea but if it’s rotating at that speed the wouldn’t it be possible to capture images at 25fps? I assume the rotation would be fairly consistent so timing the image capture should be possible.

Vaguely less visible man!

By locater16 • Score: 3 Thread
“It is I, vaguely less visible than you’d otherwise suspect man! I shall sneak by their cameras while hoping they aren’t paying attention that much. For if they do glance at the cameras they’ll have to be paying more attention than usual to see me, haha!”

Make a silent drone I’ll be more impressed

By LindleyF • Score: 3 Thread
Those things are loud.

Is There a Way to Promote Open Document Formats Instead of ‘MS Office’ Format?

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
The Register looks at exactly why “It is practically impossible to move any non-trivial Word document out of MS Office to a non-MS suite and back again without it being more trouble than it’s worth.”
OOXML, developed by Microsoft and first standardized by Ecma in 2006, became the ISO/IEC 29500 standard in 2008 after a grueling and adversarial process. Microsoft pursued standardization because it has always been a standards-led organization dedicated to maximizing the options for its customers. Or because it had to at gunpoint, while vowing silently to follow the letter of the law but stymie its intent. You decide… The Document Foundation (TDF) which spends its days worrying about such things, reports that Microsoft has effectively broken the standard by sticking with a transitional version as its default rather than the cleaner Strict variant. The result is that what Microsoft software renders is what Microsoft wants to render, despite nominal compliance…

What we need is a test suite that can take any OOXML engine and test its compliance against what Microsoft is actually doing. That means the tooling wrapped around the spec has to account for proprietary dependencies that get smuggled in, such as fonts. It also means actively and continuously tracking the ground truth of Microsoft’s evolving products and services. It doesn’t need to be perfect, but it absolutely needs to be good enough. Compliant engines have to become good enough for a critical mass of users to coalesce around them.
In an earlier article The Document Foundation reminded all software users that they have a choice. “When an institution sends a letter formatted with a proprietary font, embedded in a proprietary format, produced by proprietary software, it is not communicating information but perpetuating a dependency.”

“Digital sovereignty begins with the recognition that this is a choice: the file format is a choice, the font on the page is a choice, and the software is a choice.”

PDF

By JBMcB • Score: 5, Informative Thread
“When an institution sends a letter formatted with a proprietary font, embedded in a proprietary format, produced by proprietary software, it is not communicating information but perpetuating a dependency.”

This problem has been solved. PDF. I’ve never received a letter, or any correspondence from a company, institution, or school formatted as a Word or Excel document, and I don’t know why anyone would send one in any other format.

Re:PDF

By hadleyburg • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

This problem has been solved. PDF

Although PDF is not well suited for collaboration, when you are sending the document with the expectation that they will modify it and send it back…

Pragmatism

By hadleyburg • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

I think you have to be a bit pragmatic about this sort of thing, and choose your battles.

Proprietary formats involve all sorts of risks, but when they are commonly used, it can be difficult to push a large group of people to change.

I’d suggest focussing on the document category. For documents which need to last a long time, you could propose a format that people are likely to be able to use in 10 or 20 years. I think that sort of reasoning will make sense to others.

But if you just send back a MS Word document because you are frustrated that it is not in a well thought out standard format, you are at risk of becoming an IT curmudgeon. The sender of the document, who might not know the ins and outs of file formats, but has been supplied a PC installed with MS Office, might, not unreasonably, consider your response to be unprofessional.

How about

By spaceman375 • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

The TDF should sue microsoft for slander. Specifically, when you try to open an ODF in an M$ product, you get a screenfull of FUD claiming it’s malware, designed to scare away any non-technical user. It’s an open format; they could just display it and try to save it in their own format later. This suit won’t cure the problem, but it’s a good start.

Use ODT and ODS

By Wolfling1 • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
We dumped Office a few years ago, and have been using LibreOffice since. When we send documents out to our clients, we send them as ODTs and ODSes. All our internals are ODTs and ODSes too.

In over 5 years, it has never been a problem. Office reads these files, and will happily save back to them.

Better yet, removing Office from our ecosystem has dramatically reduced costs both in Infrastructure and in ongoing maintenance.

If only we could remove Microsoft’s aborted HTML variant monstrosity from emails sent by Outlook, my life would be fulfilled.

Steam On Linux Use Back Above 4% In July

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Valve just published the Steam Survey results for July 2026, reports Phoronix, “and they point to a small uptick in Linux gaming use.”
Back in March Steam on Linux hit a record high of 5.33%, dropped to 4.52% in April, landed at 3.99% in May, and then in June was at 3.69%. The just-published numbers for July put Steam on Linux use at 4.01%, as an improvement over the prior two months but still well off the percentage highs of March and April…

The July data puts SteamOS Holo as powering around 22% of Steam on Linux gaming systems. That’s also with the Steam Machine now shipping, in addition to the Steam Deck.

Group of Teen Hikers Relied on Google Maps. It Was a Disaster.

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“When a group of teenagers set out to hike British Columbia’s famed Howe Sound Crest Trail in early July, Google Maps suggested the trek would take about five hours,” reports SFGate.

“Instead, the hike stretched deep into the night, leaving the group exhausted, dehydrated, injured and in need of a helicopter rescue…”
Although the approximately 18-mile route with a 6,000-foot elevation gain can be completed by experienced trail runners in a day, search and rescue officials generally recommend hikers treat it as a two-day backpacking trip. The teenagers, all 17 years old, believed Google Maps’ estimate that the route would take about five hours. The printed directions they were carrying, which were shared publicly by Lions Bay Search and Rescue, gave simple instructions for two legs of the trail, but didn’t account for the terrain or elevation. "[Google Maps] is calculating the time that you’re walking a straight road on pavement,” [said Maria Masiar, training officer and search manager with Lions Bay Search and Rescue]. “When you get into outdoor terrain, that no longer holds true.”

Expecting only a short outing, each hiker carried about half a liter of water and limited food. There are no reliable water sources along the trail, meaning hikers must carry enough supplies for the entire route. As the group climbed, they began suffering from dehydration and muscle cramps but continued onward despite falling dramatically behind schedule. Eventually, the group made the decision to turn back and abandon making it to the end of the trail — and as the sun began to set and the group started to descend, fatigue took its toll. According to Masiar, members of the group had already stumbled and fallen several times while trying to race the coming dark, and only one hiker had a headlamp. Eventually, another hiker slipped about 10 feet off a boulder, injuring his tailbone badly enough that he could no longer continue. Search and rescue crews responded, ultimately evacuating him by helicopter.

I’m surprised it had any trails at all

By itsme1234 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I mean Google Maps it’s a sh*show for literally going 15 minutes from the car in the “woods” in Western Europe (quotes there because it’s more like someone’s backyard in other places less populated, and I don’t mean a king or anything). OpenStreetMaps are way better but it has to be a somehow popular region/destination.

Dumb

By ceoyoyo • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

People do dumb stuff in the mountains all the time. A couple of people apparently tried to hike this trail last winter in shorts.

This is a BC provincial park so there is undoubtedly a great big sign at the trailhead telling you how long to expect it to take and advising minimal equipment you should make sure to bring. There’s also an official website (advising only experienced hikers go beyond a certain point) and many, many other websites.

Using technology is hard

By quonset • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I’m going to victim blame. This is what happens when you blindly accept what a computer tells you. Based solely on this story, none of them did the least bit of research into what this trail entailed OTHER than what Google Maps said. Again, based solely on this story, none checked with any of the ranger stations or even the web site of the trail itself to see if it had any information on this trail.

If you’ve never hiked a trail, or even driven somewhere, in this day and age there is absolutely no excuse for not doing your research (the good kind, not the vaccination kind) prior to leaving. We literally have the information at our fingertips to find out what something is like prior to going there. How about we use it.

Rescuer perspective

By Arrogant-Bastard • Score: 5, Informative Thread
I’ve done a lot of incident response, and was a certified trainer for over a decade. One of the things I’ve observed is that the higher the reliance on technology among the party, the higher the probability that they’ll require rescue. People who can read a topo map, can use a compass, who understand the importance of carrying more water than they think they’ll ever need, and who have a (tested, working) flashlight rarely get into trouble. People who rely on Google/Apple/whatever maps, who are glued to their cell phones, who can’t read a map or use a compass, set themselves up for issues. Of course, thankfully, most of the time those issues don’t arise or are minor. But when they’re not…

In this particular instance: 6000 feet of elevation gain is rather a lot. I’ve done 5000 up/down in a single day, but that’s a LONG day even for someone who’s fairly fit and accustomed to the exertion. Anyone who’s not in shape is going to really struggle not just with the exertion but with the altitude, and we see in this instance, as they fatigue they may stumble and/or fall. It’s just not a good idea, even for (let’s say) young people who are physically active, go to the gym, play a sport or two — because it’s a very different kind of physical activity and because you can’t just stop when you’ve had enough.

Aside: experienced trail runners make all of us look silly. I remember slogging my way up a trail at 11,000 feet when I heard the quick tap-tap-tap of one behind me. He went by with a quick “Morning!” and just kept going. I was still slogging my way up at about 12,000 feet when I saw him coming toward me, on his way back down — same tap-tap-tap at the same pace, just out for a casual morning trot while we ordinary mortals were trudging along. I’m willing to bet that he did that trail often enough to know every rock, to have every step mapped out in his brain, to just dance his way up and down.

Pedestrians get sent round traffic circles

By joeblog • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Using Google maps as a pedestrian is really dangerous. It tells you to walk around traffic circles as if you’re a car that has to do 270 degrees.

Also, it keeps pointing the map north even if you’re walking south.

Does Eating Less Protein Produce Healthier Aging and Metabolism?

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“A major scientific review is challenging the idea that more protein is always better,” reports ABC News:
The review, led by pathologist and biomedical researcher Dudley Lamming and published in the journal Cell Press Blue, examined more than 350 studies involving humans, mice, insects, yeast, and other organisms. The review found that eating less protein, or less of certain amino acids that make up protein, may turn on body processes linked to healthier aging, as well as metabolism, the process by which the body turns food and drinks into energy…

For adults who already get enough, eating more protein may offer little benefit, while some research suggests that eating less protein could support healthier aging… Lamming reviewed the effect of reducing protein in many body processes. One of the processes involves a hormone called FGF21. “There’s an increase in a hormone called FGF21 that promotes energy expenditure [when protein intake is reduced],” Lamming said. “It essentially increases thermogenesis in your adipose tissue, so you don’t just store fat, but actually burn it as fuel.” This may help explain why some studies connect lower-protein diets with less body fat, better blood sugar control and a healthier metabolism. Eating less protein may also affect signals that tell cells when to grow, repair damage or recycle old cell parts. These jobs may play a role in aging.

However, protein restriction is not the same as protein deficiency. The goal is not to deprive the body of an essential nutrient. Instead, the research raises the possibility that avoiding unnecessary excess could benefit some people who already consume enough… Before reaching for another high-protein product, a better question may be: How much protein does my body actually need?

Re:Protein

By mistergrumpy • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

1. Eat food, not too much, mostly plants

2 Everything in moderation, including moderation

Meta-Analysis

By crunchy_one • Score: 3 Thread
Meta-analysis of “more than 350 studies” can lead to misleading results. Or, with a bit of tweaking, just about any results you wish to find.

Proteinaholic: How Our Obsession with Meat is…

By Paul Fernhout • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Killing Us and What We Can Do About It by Garth Davis M.D., Howard Jacobson: https://www.amazon.com/Protein…
====
An acclaimed surgeon specializing in weight loss delivers a paradigm-shifting examination of the diet and health industry’s focus on protein, explaining why it is detrimental to our health, and can prevent us from losing weight.

Whether you are seeing a doctor, nutritionist, or a trainer, all of them advise to eat more protein. Foods, drinks, and supplements are loaded with extra protein. Many people use protein for weight control, to gain or lose pounds, while others believe it gives them more energy and is essential for a longer, healthier life. Now, Dr. Garth Davis, an expert in weight loss asks, “Is all this protein making us healthier?”

The answer, he emphatically argues, is NO. Too much protein is actually making us sick, fat, and tired, according to Dr. Davis. If you are getting adequate calories in your diet, there is no such thing as protein deficiency. The healthiest countries in the world eat far less protein than we do and yet we have an entire nation on a protein binge getting sicker by the day.

As a surgeon treating obese patients, Dr. Davis was frustrated by the ever-increasing number of sick and overweight patients, but it wasn’t until his own health scare that he realized he could do something about it. Combining cutting-edge research, with his hands-on patient experience and his years dedicated to analyzing studies of the world’s longest-lived populations, this explosive, groundbreaking book reveals the truth about the dangers of protein and shares a proven approach to weight loss, health, and longevity.
====

Also: “How Do You Prevent Protein Deficiency? Dr. Joel Fuhrman”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?…
        “In this informative discussion, Dr. Joel Fuhrman breaks down the importance of protein adequacy and optimal macronutrient ratios for longevity on a plant-based diet. Learn about the surprising fat content of meat, the risks associated with low-carb diets like keto and carnivore, and the science-backed approach of the Nutritarian diet. Discover the crucial role of nuts and seeds in promoting longevity, as demonstrated in the Adventist Health Study, and gain practical tips for fueling athletic performance with whole plant foods.”

Meat has been marketed based on scaring people about protein.
Dairy has been marketed based on scaring people about calcium.
You can generally get enough of each if you eat a varied whole-foods plat-based diet especially one including beans and nuts and seeds etc.. Calcium is actually the harder one than protein (since if you get enough calories from whole foods you generally get enough protein):
https://www.worldofvegan.com/v…

Re:Food-“Sciences” habe been pathetic

By SoftwareArtist • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

You’re confusing mainstream nutrition advice with fad diets. The Mediterranean diet was proposed in 1975, and by the 1980s it was already widely embraced by mainstream nutritionists as the recommended way to eat. In the 40 years since then, that has never changed. The evidence for it has only gotten stronger with time.

Meanwhile, countless fad diets have come along, each based on some fringe theory and unsupported by solid evidence. And every time that happens, the mainstream nutritionists say, “Please ignore them. Eat a Mediterranean diet.” And people like you say, “What’s wrong with these scientists? Why do they keep recommending new diets that are different from the old ones?”

Re:Proteinaholic: How Our Obsession with Meat is..

By phantomfive • Score: 4, Informative Thread

If you are getting adequate calories in your diet, there is no such thing as protein deficiency.

This part is absolutely false. Several proteins are essential amino acids, which means your body cannot synthesize them itself. They MUST be eaten. It doesn’t matter how many calories are in your diet, if you do not eat those amino acids, you will have a protein deficiency.

Maybe this doctor is being misquoted, but you do need protein in your diet.

In a First, ‘Super-Earth’ Planet Shows It Could Have an Atmosphere

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“Scientists say they have detected promising signs that a planet orbiting a star 49 light-years from Earth could have an atmosphere,” reports CNN, “making it potentially suitable for life.”
Called LHS 1140b, the object is about five times the mass of our planet, or a “super-Earth.” This planet orbits around its star in the "Goldilocks zone,” also known as the habitable zone, meaning its surface temperature is not too hot or too cold for liquid water to exist… “It appears to be consistent with Earth, meaning it might have an iron core and a silicate mantle, plus some sort of low-density component, which is probably a combination of water and, now we know, an atmosphere,” [said Collin Cherubim, a planetary scientist and lead author of a paper on the finding, published July 16 in the journal Science]… If further observations confirm the findings, LHS 1140b would mark the first discovery of an atmosphere on a rocky planet in the habitable zone of another star…

There is no evidence of life or a life-supporting atmosphere on LHS 1140b now, but Cherubim said he believes it’s a formidable candidate for potential signatures of extraterrestrial life. “I think it’s the best place to look for life outside the solar system at this point,” he said. “It’s mostly rocky, it’s at the right temperature to support liquid water on the surface, and it has an atmosphere — those are the three key ingredients we look for…” Confirming the existence of an atmosphere on a rocky planet orbiting a red dwarf would be particularly exciting, Cherubim said, because the possibility of that happening is an open question in astronomy. “Can rocky planets have atmospheres around red dwarfs? This is the first bona fide yes,” he said. “It’s kind of a sigh of relief for a lot of us. But the jury’s still out. Maybe this is a weird planet, and it’s an oddball, or maybe it’s the first of many. We don’t know yet.”
Now “The James Webb Space Telescope is going to look at it,” Cherubim told CNN, and “Hubble’s going to look at it. Basically, everybody who can see it is going to be training their eyes on it.”

Michaël Gillon, research director of the Astrobiology Research Unit at Belgium’s University of Liège warned CNN that no definitive proof exists that LHS 1140b possesses a substantial atmosphere. But if the detection of helium can be confirmed, the implications would be profound. “Until now, we had only limited evidence for atmospheres on temperate rocky exoplanets. Demonstrating that LHS 1140 b has retained a substantial atmosphere over billions of years would show that at least some habitable zone Super-Earths around red dwarfs can survive the intense early activity of their host stars.”

49 light years… so close!

By guygo • Score: 3 Thread

It would only take 77,000 years to get there at the fastest speed accomplished by a human-made object. Hey Elon… Excelsior!

Re:The uses of Helium

By ClickOnThis • Score: 4, Informative Thread

What would be REALLY exciting - over and above finding intelligent extraterrestrial non-human life - is discovering that they could metabolize helium.

Why not? The aliens in Project Hail Mary could build solid objects out of xenon, so why not helium?

I can say confidently that nothing has or is going to metabolize helium anytime soon. Helium is the noblest of all the noble gases. It can’t form compounds with anything, except under extreme conditions such as 300,000 times Earth’s atmospheric pressure.

Xenon, on the other hand is a noble gas that can form compounds, typically involving fluorine or oxygen. Some of them are used industrially.

Linux Desktop Market Share Surpasses 10% in North America

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
The blog Linuxiac reports:
Linux has crossed a major milestone in North America, with the open-source operating system now accounting for 10.65% of desktop usage in the region, according to Statcounter’s latest figures for July 2026. The result places Linux firmly in double-digit territory for the first time in Statcounter’s North American desktop operating system statistics.

For comparison, Statcounter recorded Linux at 5.52% in June 2026, so the share nearly doubled in one month… However, the sharp monthly increase needs context. Statcounter’s June figures included an “Unknown” category that accounted for 9.24% of North American desktop usage. Its reduction seems to have coincided with Linux’s rise, possibly indicating better identification of previously unclassified traffic…

Statcounter is not the only major web measurement platform showing Linux with a substantial presence on North American desktops. Cloudflare Radar data, filtered to desktop HTTP traffic from North America over the previous 28 days, also places Linux at a notably high level [9.4%].
StatCounter’s data also shows Linux with an even larger market share of 11.87% in just the United States — and a 14.73% market share in India. Linux’s market share in other world regions:
Asia 7.17%
Africa 5.71%
Europe 5.49%
South America 4.35%
China 2.12%

And here’s how the Linux market share in other countries compare to India and the U.S.
India 14.73%
United States 11.87%
Germany 7.24%
UK 6.18%
Canada 3.83%
Australia 3.55%

Linux’s surge could be due to its use in automation or headless browser workloads, Linuxiac points out. But another possibility is “growing frustration with Windows hardware requirements, advertising, account integration, telemetry, and forced interface changes has pushed some users to explore alternatives…”

“For now, the safest conclusion is that Linux has surpassed 10% of measured desktop web usage in North America according to Statcounter, not necessarily 10% of the region’s installed desktop computer base.”

Re:Bots

By Bumbul • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
In the TFS, there was a clear eplanation for the change in just 30 days: “Statcounter’s June figures included an “Unknown” category that accounted for 9.24% of North American desktop usage. Its reduction seems to have coincided with Linux’s rise, possibly indicating better identification of previously unclassified traffic…”

Fed up with Windows needing something every start

By Arnonyrnous Covvard • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Switched to Linux. Yes, after decades you lose a lot of muscle memory advantage and need to find new solutions for things that you already solved in a different environment, but once I got over that initial hurdle, I haven’t looked back. Windows only exists as a VM now, for the few Windows-only things. Linux isn’t perfect, far from it, but Windows has gotten tiresome and hostile.

Re:Netcraft Confirms

By drinkypoo • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Or, maybe better terminology, the year Microsoft finally fscked themselves with no backwards compatibility with even (well maintained) 10 year old laptops being good enough for 99% of the web.

Microsoft needs OEMs to buy licenses, even at a deeply discounted rate this is important (and importantly, has been dependable) revenue. They only do that when they are selling PCs. Microsoft had to help those OEMs sell PCs to capture that revenue.

Microsoft knows that source is drying up. Companies will be able to move away from Windows. This is why they have been shifting their focus towards the cloud. Like IBM, they have become a services company as they became staid and unable to execute on delivering exciting products, or in fact products people want. Instead, the best they can do is products they’re forced to use. The money is all the same color no matter what the feelings behind it are…

Re:Fed up with Windows needing something every sta

By toutankh • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Windows has gotten tiresome and hostile

If by “has gotten” you imply “in the past thirty years”. In that whole time it has been about controlling rather than empowering the customers. Things like overwriting the MBR without asking, the existence of the registry, changing the control panel, generally ruining things that work and that people are used to, fostering monopoly of other Microsoft products, *checks notes* upgrading Windows to the next version without asking for consent. Maybe these things didn’t affect you, but they are all real and not new.

Windows 11 is very different

By rsilvergun • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Microsoft has had dog shit software in the past. But it wasn’t necessarily because of evil it was incompetence. There is some problems with Microsoft Office where the format is intentionally overly complex to make it difficult to reverse engineer and other bits of nastiness like that. But for the most part when an entire operating system from Microsoft sucks like Vista or 8 it’s because Microsoft screwed the pooch by accident.

Typically Microsoft intentionally bloats their operating systems so that oems have something to sell new computers for. That’s a long standing and not terribly secret thing and it’s why every new iteration of windows gobbles is much RAM and GPU and CPU as they can. But that wasn’t really a factor with Windows 11 or even Windows 10 because we had just gotten to the point where computers were fast enough.

With Windows 11 it’s the spyware. It’s grinding the computer to a halt so they can monitor what you’re doing to train their AI bullshit to replace you at your job. It’s also a fuck ton of nasty DRM and other associated nastiness so that corporations can spy on you and control your computer. This makes your computer increasingly unusable. That’s a relatively new thing.

Are Return-to-Office Mandates Killing Workers’ Trust in Workplaces?

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
The Hill published the thoughts of Gleb Tsipursky, Ph.D., who serves as the CEO of the future-of-work consultancy Disaster Avoidance Experts:
A recent EnhancV survey of 1,000 full-time U.S. workers subject to new or stricter return-to-office policies found that 72% suspect these mandates are really a voluntary attrition strategy — a strategy by their own employers to make them quit their jobs. A full 46% admit to the practice of coffee-badging. Thirty-six percent have applied for a new job while sitting at their current office desk. Thirty-six percent have started a side hustle since the mandate was announced, in anticipation of being let go or quitting. Those numbers do not prove that employees reject collaboration. They show that many employees no longer trust the official story…

The central mistake in many in-office mandates is the assumption that proximity automatically produces commitment. It does not. A worker who spends two hours commuting to sit on video calls with colleagues in other cities is not experiencing culture. That worker is experiencing theater. When executives describe the office as a cure-all, many employees experience lost time, higher costs and lower autonomy. The policy’s defining feature becomes its credibility gap. Research keeps undercutting the belief that more office time automatically means better performance. A University of Pittsburgh analysis of S&P 500 firms found that return-to-office mandates reduced employee satisfaction without improving firm performance or firm value....

Baylor University’s reporting on office mandates and brain drain found that firms with mandates faced greater turnover among women, senior employees, managers and high-skilled workers, while job vacancy duration increased and hiring rates declined. In other words, the people with the most options are often the first to leave. The employees who remain may not be the most committed — they may simply be the least mobile… Attendance can be mandated, but commitment cannot. When leaders confuse the two, they do not rebuild workplace culture. They create a room full of people planning their exit.

Re:Pretty simple

By jhoegl • Score: 4, Informative Thread
Im going to let you know that it was already allowed for introverts with high production to work from home. Before COVID WFH was allowed for quite a few people, including executives.
Those that do not earn an income off of physical labor, as you pointed out, waste personal time on daily travel that adds nothing of significance to the job. Is work being completed? Is there a concern with performance? Then address them, dont be scared to talk with the employee.
But they are scared, otherwise they wouldnt lie, they wouldnt worry about talking with the employee, and they wouldnt try some convoluted excuse.
There is nothing new here, except that the general public realized that the unnecessary bits were imposed upon them by Executives who are in charge of buildings they have a stake in or own, and freaked out when companies were re-evaluating the need for the physical presence.
The really good analysis was that WFH doesnt take away from the business. That was stated multiple times, and still is a valid point.

Re:Wow

By pla • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
It’s much simpler than all that - Remote work proves management are exactly as useless and attention-seeking as we always suspected they were.

Leaders equating line-of-sight supervision with effectiveness found themselves without their primary management tool

having well-trained, well-motivated managers leads to massive boosts in productivity from hybrid and remote working models. The data support this argument from the flip side, too. Among companies that reported struggles with remote work, this issue was concentrated in firms in which leaders fumbled the management and coordination of their remote teams.

Remote and hybrid workers are struggling with leadership gaps that were never addressed when companies shifted out of the office. Many management habits remain rooted in on-site visibility rather than clear expectations and outcomes.

And most damning of all, The study concludes that narcissistic leaders oppose virtual work primarily because it threatens their access to power and status, rather than out of concern for organizational productivity. Shandell, Elliott, and Grant write that “leader narcissism is a critical but neglected source of resistance to remote work.”

Who cares?

By rsilvergun • Score: 5, Informative Thread
Or rather who that matters actually cares?

Return to office was about commercial real estate property values so that a couple of billionaires who are heavily invested in it didn’t lose their investments. Every single credible study has shown that work from home improves productivity and is universally beneficial because it gets people off the roads so if you are somebody who genuinely has to go into the office you have less traffic and cleaner air.

Nobody is going to care whether employees are happy or not anymore. Not broadly. Automation has been devouring jobs since the late 70s and by all accounts the pace is going to accelerate. So employers don’t need to be nice to you anymore.

The Hatred of an Office - A History Lesson.

By geekmux • Score: 4, Informative Thread

This utter hatred of going to an office has its roots in Covid.

The Remote Desktop Protocol and 128+ bits of entropy protecting a VPN tunnel, has existed for 20+ years now.

The same Remote Desktop Protocol that enables grown-ass professionals to not waste upwards of a fucking fiscal quarter** every calendar year sitting behind a steering wheel commuting to a job that could be done remotely.

The utter hatred of going into an office, has existed for a LOT longer than COVID-era investors refusing to degrade the 10x premium on dirt invested into your 401k and pension funds as “business” grade dirt, and a LOT longer than No Moron Hired Behind DEI laws and practices that also destroy remote work policies because they cannot be trusted to actually work remotely.

Re:Pretty simple

By flink • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Every employer I’ve had in my 30yr professional career did not care if its programmers came into the office. This included fortune 500 multinationals, mid size regional companies, and small LLCs. WFH has only become an issue since it became a political rallying cry in the culture war.

As New York Finalizes New Social Media Rules, US Senate Considers Nationwide ‘SCREEN’ Act

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
New York has finalized new rules that will govern social media apps in the state starting on January 25, 2027. The law prohibits social media platforms from sending notifications to minors between midnight and 6 a.m. without parental consent. And minors “will only be shown content from other accounts they follow or otherwise select in a set sequence, such as chronological order,” rather than “the default algorithmically personalized feeds… unless they get parental consent for an addictive feed.” (Social media companies “must offer at least one alternative method for age assurance besides providing a government-issued ID,” the announcements points out, and any information used to determine age “must not be used for any other purpose and must be deleted or de-identified immediately after its intended use.”)

But meanwhile, the EFF writes that a committee in the U.S. Senate is considering the SCREEN ACT, “a sweeping age-verification bill that would require online services to verify users’ ages before they can access any sexually explicit content. If this bill passes, it will force millions of adult internet users to give up their anonymity, privacy, and security before they access lawful speech.”
Unlike many state-age verification laws — which have been harmful in their own right — the SCREEN Act has no requirement that a significant portion of the website consist of sexually explicit content that is harmful to minors. The bill requires nearly any service hosting even a single piece of sexually explicit content to verify the ages of its users. The result is that the bill would apply not only to adult content sites like PornHub or OnlyFans, but also streaming services like Netflix, and social media platforms like Reddit, Discord, or Bluesky, if they host any adult content…

Under the SCREEN Act, the “bouncer” will be a digital age-verification service that captures your personal information and saves it to a database for an unspecified amount of time. The consequences of the bill won’t be limited to minors. If websites and apps are expected to reliably identify teenagers, adults will be asked to prove they are adults. Even worse, the SCREEN Act is a privacy and data security nightmare. One provision of the bill requires services to take reasonable steps to protect the data collected and to not maintain for longer than is necessary. But these are terribly weak protections that impose no meaningful collection, use, or retention limits on services collecting people’s private information…

The SCREEN Act also targets virtual private network (VPN) users and providers. The bill requires covered websites to verify users’ ages based on their IP addresses unless the service can determine that the user is outside the United States, and specifically requires age verification on traffic coming from known VPN addresses. In practice, this discourages the use of VPNs and proxy servers, which millions of people rely on for legitimate purposes such as protecting personal privacy, securing public Wi-Fi connections, safeguarding journalists and activists, and preventing data tracking…

The SCREEN Act creates onerous age-verification rules that will block adults from accessing lawful speech, curtail their ability to be anonymous, and jeopardize the data security and privacy of all internet users.

You’re assuming that’s not the point.

By dgatwood • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

At this point, I’ve stopped giving politicians the benefit of the doubt. If they support regulations that look like they have the potential to drag the United States into becoming an authoritarian hellhole, I assume that they’re actually trying to do just that. It makes it a lot easier to convince myself to vote for another candidate in every election afterwards, even if that candidate isn’t as good in other areas, because at least the other candidate isn’t trying to destroy our basic freedoms.

Look up the sponsors of the bill, and vote against them from now on, whether it’s a primary or a general election. Repeat until ousted.

Pretentious backronym

By fahrbot-bot • Score: 5, Funny Thread

From the actual House/Senate bills:

This Act may be cited as the “Shielding Children’s Retinas from Egregious Exposure on the Net Act” or the “SCREEN Act”.

[rolls eyes, *sigh*]

Re:This already exists

By jsonn • Score: 5, Funny Thread
I think the IRS certainly qualifies as BDSM…

Re:Zero Knowledge Proofs

By allo • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
It doesn’t matter much … because possessing such a certificate doesn’t say you’re the owner of it. To control who’s using the site you would need to both know the certificate, have it contain an image of you and activate your webcam so one can control that you are sitting in front of the PC and not someone else who may be a minor. Effective age verification cannot be done from the remote end. So make the parents accountable for their child’s online behavior instead of the site owners. You can turn off notifications by just switching off networks at night and you can prevent access to porn sites using a filter on your device. Then sites only need to add a flag “adult site” (many already do) and your filter can prevent access to them.

Re:You’re assuming that’s not the point.

By jhoegl • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Google and Facebook are the ones that wrote the bill.
Just so you understand who wants this data.

How ‘Situational Awareness’ Hedge Fund Dropped 67% in AI Stock Rout

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
CNN tells the unfortunate tale of hedge fund Situational Awareness, “founded in 2024 by German-born Leopold Aschenbrenner when he was in his early 20s.”
Aschenbrenner, a former OpenAI employee, founded the hedge fund on the premise that “AI will be the dominant driver of global market returns over the next decade,” according to the firm’s site… Aschenbrenner managed to turn hundreds of millions of dollars into tens of billions of dollars over the course of roughly two years… That streak ended on Thursday, though, when the fund was forced to sell the bulk of its public holdings to a bigger rival after many of its investments went south.

But that’s only part of the story. The fund employed a risky strategy of borrowing money to purchase stocks. When the investments appreciate, the payoff can be massive. But when the investments sour, the losses can be catastrophic. The downturn in AI stocks over the course of this month, like chip makers and cloud computing providers, hit the hedge fund extra hard. It was forced to sell off many investments at a steep discount to rival hedge fund Citadel in what Aschenbrenner reportedly compared to a “bank run” in a letter to investors.
“Critics pointed out that Aschenbrenner had no experience running money prior to launching his fund in July 2024, calling him more lucky than smart,” writes CNBC:
Some noted that his early work experience was at the doomed crypto firm FTX, where he helped now-disgraced founder Sam Bankman-Fried run a charity out of a Bahamas penthouse. Others on Wall Street, including former traders at global investment banks, noted that in light of reports Situational Awareness used as much as 400% leverage, the collapse wasn’t shocking.
The Wall Street Journal reports that Situational Awareness “also used options to amplify its returns. That meant that even small declines in individual names could have big impacts on Situational’s portfolio.”

And so, as the New York Post put it, “The celebrated crystal ball of the 'Nostradamus of AI' hasn’t merely gone cloudy — it has rolled off the table and shattered on the parlor floor.”
Wall Street breathed a huge sigh of relief last week as an AI-focused hedge fund called Situational Awareness reportedly sold most of its portfolio — reportedly down 67% last month on the backfiring of debt-fueled bets on chipmakers and assorted artificial-intelligence firms — to billionaire Ken Griffin’s Citadel…

The prevailing sentiment was best summed up by a veteran Wall Street sage who has seen a lot of flameouts in his day. Let’s just say he wasn’t impressed by Leopold Aschenbrenner, the 25-year-old German-born “Nostradamus” figure who is the founder of Situational Awareness… “Just your typical leveraged idiot who was right until he was wrong,” the source said, adding that the implosion is a “one-off....”

[Another trusted source] felt there was room for conversation: “A significant issue. Not viewed as systemic right now. I wonder if that changes as more problems arise.” Indeed, the fact is that most of Wall Street is closely monitoring the Situational Awareness situation because they were holding many of the same positions as Aschenbrenner. Another top hedge fund manager I won’t name tells me he has been getting crushed on similar investments in chipmakers essential to the AI supply chain, as well as other companies feeding off this technology.
Thanks to Slashdot reader joshuark for sharing the news.

Average WSB regard

By bubblyceiling • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
400 % leverage, risky options play, ex-crypto bro, goes all in on the next big hype.

For a second I thought this was r/wallstreetbets

Hedge fail

By phantomfive • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
A hedge fund is named such because they (traditionally) hedge against risk. Thus, whether the stock goes up or down, the hedge fund can make money (and lose money if it stays flat).

This fund clearly failed on the hedging. No point in using a hedge fund at that point, might as well have just bought the stock (or options if you’re crazy).

Old technique

By gurps_npc • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

There is an old technique - the guaranteed winner by random chance:

You get 32 stock brokers. On Monday the boss picks 2 stocks. 16 say that stock is going up, 16 say down, and they each call 100 people and give their prediction. That evening the 16 that were ‘right’ call their 100 back and brag. Tuesday they repeat only with 8 on each side. Repeat on Wednesday with 4 winners. Thursday they have 2 winners. Friday they have 1 winner that brags to his 100 prospects:

“Look, I happened to predict the winner every day this week. I can not guarantee that will happen every day, but if you want to hear my predictions next Monday, I need you to move your account to my firm.”

And the gullible fool does it, not knowing that mathematically the predictions were guaranteed to work on 1 of the 32 brokers. Just math, not competence.

Betting on AI was not some super genius move - especially using margin. All it involved was taking the popular opinion and going all in. While it worked you look like a genius. When it fails, you lose everything.

He just played the odds and won for a while. But the math was never going to have him win forever.

Markets can remain irrational longer than you can

By joeblog • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

I learnt the old John Maynard Keynes adage “Markets can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent” the hard way early, luckily not with other people’s money and I didn’t have much money to lose back then.

Since then I’ve stuck to Burton Malkiel’s advice in A Random Walk Down Wallstreet and kept all my money in index-tracking ETFs and more than recouped my early losses.

A reminder to anyone who thinks they can “logically pick stocks” is Isaac Newton, who besides being history’s greatest maths genius was the equivalent of the central bank governor of his day so had lots of insider info, lost his entire fortune playing the stock market.

Keynes, who was a successful investor, simplified it to second guessing popular taste. It’s not picking what you think is attractive, but what the general public thinks is attractive. My taste and what people vote for are miles apart, so again ETFs are for me.

Active fund management is obviously a scam: if someone is that good at stock picking, why do they need your money?

Re:“founded in 2024 … when he was in his early 2

By Ol Olsoc • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Why, is losing your money any less painful if the bad decisions were made by 50 or 60 year oldfags like the management of Lehman Brothers back then?

Greed springs eternal.

I went through the Dot.com bubble. I went through the subprime bubble. I had friends who lost millions almost overnight. Two who managed to do it in both bursting bubbles.

I didn’t lose a cent. My investment advisers were some of your “oldfag” archetypes. Except they were remarkably conservative investors for me who played the long game. But the long game isn’t glamorous or flashy. It’s a slow but accelerating slog. Point is, I now have more liquid money than any of them do now. Especially that poor guy who went from looking at a seriously flush retirement to Social security level living after her lost it all a second time.

So you don’t hear a lot about us, you just see the stories about the high rollers, the handful of people that frankly, got very lucky. That inspires the greed in regular people who think they’ll do the same. Then it all burns down. But there is always new greed to take the place of the old greed. Almost impossible, people thinking they can get rich quick and fancy themselves wise investors while carrying 3 maxed out credit cards are a great target.

400 percent leverage? in what universe does that even work?

Recovery Seeds Reportedly Breached for Coldcard Hardware Bitcoin Wallets, $75M Taken

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“A hardware wallet is supposed to be the safest place to keep Bitcoin,” writes The Street, since it never connects to the internet, its keys never leave the device, and “the whole point is that an attacker would need to physically hold it to steal anything.”

The problem is that anyone who can reproduce the recovery seed doesn’t need to possess the COLDCARD, Nerds.xyz points out. More from The Street:
[The recovery seed] is supposed to come from a hardware random number generator producing 128 bits of entropy, a number so large that guessing it is computationally impossible. It wasn’t. According to Block’s engineering team a single code change on March 1, 2021 caused the firmware to silently fall back to a software-based generator instead of the hardware one. On Mk3 devices the effective search space collapsed to roughly 40 bits. Coinkite has confirmed that figure and called it preliminary. The gap between 128 bits and 40 bits is not a matter of degree. It is the difference between a lock that cannot be picked and one that can be brute-forced by anyone with rented cloud computing....

Chainalysis found the attacker went after the largest balances first, pulling more than $30 million in the opening ten minutes. Within about 25 minutes, roughly 594 BTC had moved out of some 500 single-signature wallets. One victim lost around $1.8 million… Coinkite has shipped fixed firmware, but with a warning that matters more than the patch itself. Updating does not repair an existing seed. A seed created with weak entropy stays weak forever. Affected users have to generate an entirely new wallet on updated hardware and move their coins to it.
By Saturday morning Galaxy research was tracking 1,158.66 BTC, worth roughly $75.1 million, taken from 2,673 addresses, according to the article. And “The Coldcard exploit is ONGOING,” Galaxy Research posted an hour ago on X.com. “Move Coldcard single-sig funds to safe locations immediately!”
We have reported ~600 addresses we believe to be hackers holding funds stolen from Coldcard-generated weak entropy addresses to federal investigators, industry compliance firms, and cross-industry cyber investigators.
Thanks to Slashdot reader BrianFagioli for sharing the news.

Criminal activity in the crapto space. Who cares?

By gweihir • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Seriously, this abysmally bad idea has no place in the news. Only blithering idiots are still in there.

silently?

By usedtobestine • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Does that mean they have never run their code changes in a test environment to see what they do? Perhaps under a debugger? Also, why was it even possible to fall back to such a weak keylength?

Re:seriously - who certified or tested this

By gweihir • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

40 bit is within reach of practical guessing attacks. 128 bit is not, but just barely (the limit where it becomes reliably unguessable is somewhere in the 80…100 bit range). If you are serious about things you use at the very least 256 bit. And, obviously, you do independent expert review on any major change. This one is so abysmally insightless and bad, it may well have been an intentionally placed backdoor. I wonder whether they can still reliably say who did the change.

As to who certified that, this is the crapto space. Where everything is easy, nothing needs to be certified and stupid is the name of the game.

So one should probably wonder

By 93 Escort Wagon • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

According to Block’s engineering team a single code change on March 1, 2021 caused the firmware to silently fall back to a software-based generator instead of the hardware one.

What are the odds that a COLDCARD insider has been playing the long game, and it just payed off?

Re:Criminal activity in the crapto space. Who care

By taustin • Score: 4, Funny Thread

So you’re claiming you have life changing wealth from Bitcoin? What island did you buy?

Is Big Tech’s AI Gamble Starting to Look Riskier?

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot
The Washington Post looks at giant tech companies "feeding every available dollar into the cash-incinerating maw of AI machines.” They warn “Tech superstars that once had oodles of cash left over at the end of each year are now flipping into the red…”
[While optimists expect] huge corporate profits and a society-wide boost to wealth and well-being… questions about that AI vision are now growing more urgent: When, if ever, will this payoff arrive? And what will the fallout be for Americans if the titanic investment doesn’t quickly deliver? “This AI thing better work out because if it doesn’t … we’re going to have a problem,” said Torsten Slok, chief economist at investment firm Apollo Global Management. AI costs and doubts are spreading. The U.S. stock market has swooned this summer over fear of the AI bubble going bust…

The AI gamble sweeping up American fortunes is led by tech companies splurging on hulking data centers packed with computer chips and equipment needed to develop sophisticated AI models and deliver them to customers. In investor calls in the past week, Google, Microsoft, Meta and Amazon pointed to soaring AI-related sales and business deals. Advertisers are using the technology to tailor marketing pitches and corporations and start-ups are buying access to chatbots and other AI software to boost productivity… But this spending can only continue if AI generates an even larger avalanche of new revenue to pay for it all. Financial results released over the past week show that the AI titans’ mammoth costs are largely swamping the sales boost from the technology. At Google, for every dollar of cash its business generated in the past three months, $1.15 went out the door to pay for AI computer chips and equipment, land for AI data centers and other big-ticket purchases. The company is covering the difference partly by borrowing money and selling more of its stock. Next year, five leading AI companies — Google, Amazon, Microsoft, Meta and Oracle — are projected to have negative free cash flow, which measures the cash left over after paying expenses and AI infrastructure costs. The figures, based on investment analyst projections compiled by S&P Global Market Intelligence, show a stunning reversal for what have been some of the world’s most cash-generating corporations…

The companies remain profitable by standard financial accounting measures that spread out the costs of their AI infrastructure spending over many years… Pessimists see a bet so gargantuan that it cannot possibly pay off. The pessimists are growing louder. The Bank for International Settlements, a typically measured institution in Switzerland that advises government bankers around the world, recently warned there was risk of “economy-wide recessions” if the AI boom falters. That could mean pain for workers and communities across the United States. “I’m not saying AI is going to go away, it’s just not clear to me these guys are going to make money on it,” said Christopher Wood, global head of equity strategy at investment bank Jefferies who has correctly predictedpast financial bubbles.

When did it not look risky?

By drnb • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
When did it not look risky? When did it not look like the ai bros were telling the dot com bros to hold their beer?

They are asking the wrong question....

By duwde • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
The question is not “IF” the AI bubble is going to burst, but “WHEN”. It’s impossible to keep up these spending levels in the long term, and I am yet to see AI profits outpacing the spending. There are only two kinds of people who believe otherwise: people with zero knowledge of what LLMs really are, or CEOs of AI companies

Re:All your data center are belong to us

By PPH • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

You pay a power bill? The utility that built billions worth of generation and transmission infrastructure on the promise of a future income stream gotta get paid. The bonds have to be covered or the banking system will seize up like in 2008. In the final analysis, it’s the people left still paying a power bill who will get stuck.

Re:Buffett: “Only when the tide goes out…”

By gweihir • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

It is actually worse. LLMs do sort-of have a world-model, but they cannot really use it. What they lack is deductive capabilities with the power needed to do plausibility checking against that world model. And there is no way to create that because statistical “deduction” will always be very shallow and very unreliable.

As a simpler description, LLMs have all the data, but they have no insight that would allow them to use that data competently. They can only make statistical guesses and that is not enough outside of some small and not very important application areas. Hence engineers will not get replaced. But they may get pissed and some people may find nobody wants to work for them anymore.

Starting?

By nedlohs • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Starting? Starting?

The giant silver lining to the destruction of capital this has brought is that if likely to be the end of Oracle. And maybe collapsing the tech economy is worth that one gem.