Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Meta and Apple Bring Muse Spark Open AI Model to Mac Studio
  2. Microsoft Says Windows 11 Is Now ‘More Responsive’, Runs Better On 8GB of RAM
  3. Amazon Launches New Bee ‘Personal AI’ Devices That Listen to Conversations
  4. Uber Begins Self-Driving Robotaxi Trial In Manchester
  5. Bank of America Hired 1,000 Contractors to Patch Software Flaws Exposed By Anthropic’s Mythos
  6. Mini Organs Launching to Space For Study On Aging
  7. Schools Across US Protest FCC Plan That Could Disconnect Kids From Internet
  8. Eight US States Sue OpenAI, Claiming ChatGPT Harms Young Users
  9. Microsoft Defender Now Supports Linux Desktops
  10. Epic Games’ New Vibe-Coded Launcher Is 46% Faster Than Steam
  11. US Tech Giants Warn Europe That Data Sovereignty Requirements Could Cost $128 Billion
  12. Google Is Silently Linking Your Phone Number Across All Signed-In Accounts
  13. Anthropic Warns Small AI Models Could Self-Replicate Through IoT Devices
  14. Google Play Now Lets Anyone Build Private, Vibe-Coded Apps That Run On Android
  15. Netflix Cuts About 6% of Jobs In Biggest Layoffs Since 2022

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Meta and Apple Bring Muse Spark Open AI Model to Mac Studio

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Meta has released Muse Spark Open, an 816-billion-parameter open-weight model optimized to run locally across two 512GB M5 Ultra Mac Studios using Apple’s MLX framework. Meta says it’s the “most capable U.S. open-weight model to date.” MacRumors reports:
Muse Spark Open has 816 billion total parameters with 42 billion active parameters and a 1 million-token context window. It is meant for coding and agentic work, and Meta says it excels at extended tasks, multi-step reasoning, and software engineering. The new Muse model was tuned to run on Mac Studio, and Meta says the Mac Studio paired with Muse Spark Open is the “best way to run a powerful model on your own desktop.”

From Meta: “Apple’s unified memory architecture lets the M5 Ultra’s integrated GPU use up to 512 GB per Mac Studio, so two machines can hold an entire model. And the chip’s 1.2 TB/s of memory bandwidth is fast enough to read the small slice each token needs. The result is two Mac Studios behave like one supercomputer with a terabyte of unified memory.” Apple hasn’t released the 512GB Mac Studio as of yet, but it’s supposed to be coming later this month. It won’t be cheap, because the 256GB Mac Studio is already priced over $10,000.

Microsoft Says Windows 11 Is Now ‘More Responsive’, Runs Better On 8GB of RAM

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Microsoft says recent Windows 11 updates have made the operating system up to 20% more responsive by improving memory management and reducing background resource use. “A big part of that work is making smarter use of memory and system resources,” says Navjot Virk, corporate vice president of Windows experiences at Microsoft. “We’ve improved memory management and efficiency across Windows to help keep more of your PC’s resources focused on what you’re actively doing.” The Verge reports:
The improvements to memory management now make a “meaningful difference” on PCs with just 8GB of RAM. “Windows can now keep up to 2GB more of your active data in memory instead of moving it to slower storage,” says Virk. “For example, on PCs with 8GB of memory or less, Widgets load only when you open them, making more than 200 MB of memory available for your apps and other work.”

Microsoft has also made Windows Update less disruptive, cleaned up the Widgets section, and finally allowed the taskbar to be repositioned to the sides or top of a display. Windows Hello sign-in has also been sped up, and Bluetooth pairing is more reliable, “including an AirPods pairing experience that’s up to 15 seconds faster.”

The next big step is a new Windows Search experience that’s a lot faster and more capable. […] It’s currently available for Windows Insiders, and Microsoft says it will “roll out more broadly later this year.”

“Just” 8GB???

By 31eq • • Score: 3 • Thread

I’m running Debian/Mate with 6GB total and I’m only using half of it. Pretty responsive

The taskbar is a mess!

By Murdoch5 • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread
Congratulations Microsoft, it’s 2026, and your OS finally supports taskbar positioning, except, you did it wrong. Look at how Gnome, XFCE, or KDE Plasma works with a top positioned taskbar, then, contrast against Windows 11, and you’ll realize Microsoft has shoved their head up their ass, again. What some people wanted was a functional, properly designed, formatted, styled, and interactive top taskbar. What we got, a sloppy, unprofessional, gap filled mess, that doesn’t properly reposition the taskbar, and, everything it’s hooked into.

Did no one at Microsoft on this feature think to install KDE Plasma, or Gnome, and take a look at how a professional product does a top position taskbar? Since it’s a mess, and insult to any user who wanted this feature, it’s incomplete and has yet again proven Microsoft doesn’t respect their user base. It’s broken enough that you have to leave it bottom positioned not to get annoyed or wonder what hard drug the designers were using.

Vibe coded windows

By 1s44c • • Score: 3 • Thread

Some intern got hold the source code and a Claude license and massively improved windoze.. We know from experience Microsoft programmers could not program their way out of a wet paper bag with scissors in their hands.

Re:Widgets

By slaker • • Score: 4, Informative • Thread

You can exclude them from installing through an autounattend.xml (see Schneegans.de for help building one) and prevent them from display via a GPO. You really want to use a group policy object because otherwise a Windows Update might put them back; it’ll override a plain old registry change or user preference any time it wants but GPO changes persist.

It is trivial to restore Local Group Policy editing on Windows Home SKUs with a little powershell.

Get-ChildItem @(
        “C:\Windows\servicing\Packages\Microsoft-Windows-GroupPolicy-ClientTools-Package*.mum”,
        “C:\Windows\servicing\Packages\Microsoft-Windows-GroupPolicy-ClientExtensions-Package*.mum”
) | ForEach-Object { dism.exe /online /norestart /add-package:"$_” }

Some GPO settings are ignored outside the context of Windows Education or Enterprise SKUs, but most of those are related to user behavior data mining. I can verify that if you’re just trying to supress OneDrive, Bing Search and Microsoft Account sign-ins, those are all maintained just fine even on Windows Home.

Amazon Launches New Bee ‘Personal AI’ Devices That Listen to Conversations

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Amazon has unveiled two new Bee “personal AI” devices designed to continuously record, transcribe, and analyze conversations: the $75 wearable Bee Frontier and the $100 phone-mounted Bee Eclipse. Amazon says the devices can generate conversation summaries, surface recurring themes, and recommend actions or purchases, while claiming audio itself is never stored and users can delete transcripts and summaries. CNBC reports:
The Bee Frontier is an upgraded version of Amazon’s existing wearable that can either be worn on a wrist or clipped to clothing. Similar to earlier generations, the Bee Frontier has up to seven days of battery life, but it’s also more expensive, costing $75 compared with its $50 predecessor.

Amazon acquired Bee, a San Francisco startup known for its always-listening bracelet, in July 2025 for an undisclosed amount. Bee bracelets are equipped with artificial intelligence and microphones that can record, transcribe and analyze conversations. The dual mics on the Bee Frontier have upgraded noise filtering, “so it can take note of what matters and ignore what doesn’t, even in noisy environments like a crowded restaurant or open office,” Amazon said in a blog post.

Amazon also debuted the $100 Bee Eclipse, which functions like other Bee devices, but instead of being worn, the credit card-sized gadget magnetically snaps on to the back of a smartphone. The Bee Frontier is available Thursday, while the Bee Eclipse “will be available soon,” the company said.

damn

By hjf • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

why does big tech HAVE to be so fucking creepy?

Shady Enterprise Note Taking goes Viral

By hutkept • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread
For at least several years now enterprise “note taking” apps have been skirting ethical and legal grey areas. Sales people use them to record other zoom/google-meet participants without having to ask the other participants’ permission because the recording app is outside zoom, explicitly because they know it would raise questions and freak them out. Many states make it clear this is illegal and all these apps simply say “it is the ethical and legal responsibility of the recording party to inform other participants as required” etc… In other words the companies selling this software are absolutely aware this is being done and are turning a blind eye intentionally. Now Amazon is going to make the same thing available to consumers, taking it from enterprise to the consumer space. However, the two are subtly different: nobody wants to be recorded, but at least in enterprise settings we have our “shields up”, but consumer/personal settings are when we are most vulnerable, so this level of violation is way above what had been foisted on us in the enterprise space. It is much worse than Meta’s glasses.

Re: Cinnamon and sugary

By FudRucker • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread
Apple’s shit tier software, IOS should detect what text encoding the websites use and properly set the encoding in the keyboard, I will be so glad to get rid of this damn phone soon

Legal question: All party, in person, states

By gurps_npc • • Score: 3 • Thread

In America, there are two general types of states. One party states that require permission from one person to record a conversation and All party states (sometimes called two party states) that require permission from everyone being recorded. Note, implied consent is legal where people are informed they are being recorded must object / hang up.

Six of the All party states require permission even in person:
California, Florida, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, and Montana.

Does this not mean that every single one of the Devices that listen to a conversation violate the laws of these six states? are they illegal to buy in those six states?

Do people that own these have to put a sign up warning that visitors are being recorded?

if you can’t internalize a conversation

By OrangeTide • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

Then recording it and never looking at the transcription and analysis isn’t going to accomplish much.

I would rather see AI used to help humans builds skills such as active listening, critical thinking, and organization. Making various crutches to build a society dependent on AI might seem sensible for revenue but it does not better society.

Humanity is at a crossroads. We have to decide if technology works for humanity. Or if we all work for the technology. Not making the choice is a choice in itself.

Uber Begins Self-Driving Robotaxi Trial In Manchester

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Guardian:
Uber has begun a trial of autonomous vehicles on the streets of Manchester as it looks to bring robotaxis to cities around the UK. The first self-driving cars are operating, using the technology of its partner firms Pony and Verne, with whom Uber recently launched Europe’s first autonomous taxi service in the Croatian capital, Zagreb. Uber said it was “excited to take this first step toward making this technology accessible to people across the UK.”

In social media posts, Verne said it had “started our autonomous vehicle testing in Manchester,” while Pony said there were “plans to bring robotaxis to the city” and that testing was under way. The tests involve the company mapping the streets of the city in north-west England with a safety driver behind the wheel and no passengers. Limited passenger services started last month in London, but with a safety driver in the front seat of cars supplied by Wayve under Transport for London’s licensing rules for private hire vehicles.

The next steps are unclear. Opposition from Uber drivers, their unions and the capital’s politicians to the rollout of robotaxis is mounting. The GMB and ADCU unions have both said thousands of drivers jobs will be lost and have called for help for those affected. A critical report from London assembly’s transport committee this week called for the government to devolve authority over autonomous taxi services. It said there was “considerable uncertainty about many of the claimed benefits of autonomous passenger vehicles”, and fears over the impact on public transport and congestion, as well as safeguarding and accessibility for disabled passengers. There has been no official application to launch passenger services in Manchester so far.

Who’s surprised?

By TWX • • Score: 4, Informative • Thread

This was Uber’s end-goal from the very beginning. The human drivers were only a stop-gap, as Uber wanted to position itself to lead the market in self-driving private on-demand transportation. To do that it first sought to position itself as the lead in the market for conventional private on-demand transportation.

Many businesses don’t care about the people that work for them because they only view them as liabilities, not as assets. This becomes more and more relevant the more a given business pushes their employees into being meat-cogs in their corporate machinery. Originally it was manufacturing but now the new hot thing is to push this into services.

So yeah, this is no surprise at all.

They don’t have the tech

By rsilvergun • • Score: 3 • Thread
Waymo runs their taxis remotely from a call center in the Philippines when they’re not in dead simple situations and they’re 10 years ahead of everyone else. Drag these jokers in front of a committee under oath and I’m sure they’re doing the same.

I don’t really have anything interesting to say…

By Rei • • Score: 3 • Thread

about Uber itself here. But as some minor trivia about Manchester: the “Man” comes from “Mamm”, meaning “breast”, referencing a small breast-shaped hill that used to be located in what’s now the Castlewood district (it’s since been lost).

The name of the city basically means “Tit Fort”.

Bank of America Hired 1,000 Contractors to Patch Software Flaws Exposed By Anthropic’s Mythos

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Bank of America hired 1,000 outside contractors to help patch software vulnerabilities exposed by advanced AI models, including Anthropic’s Mythos. The effort added hundreds of millions of dollars in third-quarter expenses. CNBC reports:
In an interview after the bank’s third-quarter earnings release, [CEO Brian Moynihan] said that earlier this year the company rushed to bolster a wide spectrum of its internal and vendor code using thousands of employees and outside personnel. “That risk is real risk, and that’s why when the frontier-type models came out. … A lot of us sat down and said, ‘How do we figure out how to get through this quickly?’" Moynihan told CNBC’s Leslie Picker.

“We put on 1,000 contractors to help us do the patching work in the second quarter, and those people remain here today, helping us, on top of the 3,000 people we have in that area,” he said. The bank spent a “couple hundred million plus” on the software remediation and regulatory issues related to anti-money laundering compliance in the third quarter, Moynihan told analysts earlier Wednesday.

Great value for money

By GeekWithAKnife • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
What you don’t want to do is have the crisis board meeting about public statements and how to handle the legal disclosure needs, customer outrage and trashed reputation.

They know they cannot scale to sort this out so they have to get the contractors in which is its own bag of issues BUT they are working the problem.

Obliterated Cyber capable AI models are in the hands of attackers right now. Best catch-up and get up-to-date with defence.

IMO this is a great move by BoA to show their commitment to good security. Money talks.

Re:sounds like the right way to do it

By gtall • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

In this case, they needed to get the flaws fixed fast, too fast to on-board new employees and get them working properly. Hiring a whole raft of new employees on a moment’s notice would only lead to financial problems.

That said, at least the precis did not mention BofA deciding to increase their employee count over the longer haul to keep the security risks down. My guess is they think this is a one and done deal so they can proudly declare to the board and their investors that they met the problem and had it fixed quickly.

The fact Maude, Claude, Wee Willie Winky, etc. could find the flaws means there a probably a lot more hiding and they haven’t a clue how to address them before they get hurt by them. And their board and investors are likely to be similarly blinkered.

1,000 contractors hired to patch software :o

By Mirnotoriety • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
Frederick P. Brooks: “All repairs tend to destroy the structure, to increase the entropy and disorder of the system. Less and less effort is spent on fixing the original design flaws; more and more is spent on fixing flaws introduced by earlier fixes.”

“As time passes, the system becomes less and less well-ordered. Sooner or later the fixing ceases to gain any ground. Each forward step is matched by a backward one. Although in principle usable forever, the system has worn out as a base for progress.”

Re:sounds like the right way to do it

By stripes • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Nothing like solving a critical problem in a core piece of your operations by hiring outside contractors

I’m in the awkward position of being a long time proponent of “hire experts and retain them, software isn’t a one and done it is a lifecycle and having someone with deep knowledge is a competitatave advantage”, and yet also after a lay-off at the big G a software consultant.

Which makes my opinion of this maybe a bit self serving, but it is appropriate to hire outside help for “OMG we have to fix this right away, no time to get approval for a permanent staffing increase, or to find someone who works for just the right amount of money to not upset all the employees who would want a raise if the new guy gets more…and we can put up with someone outside the normal corp culture for a few months as long as they aren’t too far outside of it…but never take a permian hire that doesn’t wear just the right tie and use the perfect tone to suck up”.

So: need a security fix before billions leak out of your company? Hire a contractor that can get the job done, unless you luck into a new employee that can.

Need to copy another companies feature before you lose all the market share? Hire a contractor, but keep “contract to employee” conversion in your back pocket.

Have an idea for a killer new feature nobody else has: develop that in house. If you really can’t get the resources allocated long term for that, a contractor is better then nothing, but you really want in house knowledge of how the feature works, and how many other departments it touches and all the technical and interdepartmental entanglements. So doing that with a outside expert makes it hard to support long term.

Plus the except from the article already says:

“We put on 1,000 contractors to help us do the patching work in the second quarter, and those people remain here today, helping us, on top of the 3,000 people we have in that area

It is unclear if the 1000 contractors “remain here today” because they were hired on year long contracts for four months of work, or if they are now a roving hit squad for tough bugs and the contract is “long term”. Also it doens’t say if the 3000 people already “in that area” are employees or other contractors. So I’m not really sure if we are seeing a company not willing to invest in operations, or if they are investing money rather then time (contractors are fast to hire but tend to cost more over time then internal hires — even if you retain them).

Re:sounds like the right way to do it

By Zocalo • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
The general expectation in industry is that the number of bugs must be finite and, even though every change might introduce new ones, as the AI models find new ones and they get fixed the total number of yet to be be found bugs will come down. As with Microsoft’s recent run of consecutive record breaking Patch Tuesdays, the conclusion being drawn is that sooner or later the number of bugs being found and fixed after each analysis session will start to fall and, subsequent to that, normal patching service, albeit on a hopefully much more robust codebase, will resume.

Where it gets a little more sticky is that, while finite, the number of available bugs to find and fix could still be extremely large, so the time required to regress back to previous, or even better than previous, bugfix development volumes is unknown. If your bet is that duration is quite short (less than a year, say), then why would you want to encumber your business with a raft of new full time employees all wanting things like health benefits and severance protections, when you can just bring in some contractors and dump them at will when they are no longer needed? If you’re thinking it’s a long game, then at least some full time employees is probably a better option because eventually they will be cheaper than using contractors, with how long that is dependant on your typical salaries for each. BoA is presumably betting on the former scenario based on what they understand of their codebase and whatever additional volume of bugs AI has found in it so far.

Mini Organs Launching to Space For Study On Aging

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Researchers from Mount Sinai, NASA, and Space Tango have launched miniature human hearts and brains to the International Space Station to study how microgravity and radiation affect organs and potentially accelerate aging. “If people are going to be living and working in space, then we need to understand what’s going to happen to them,” David Sachs, assistant professor of surgery at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, told ABC News. “But also, because it’s interesting as a model of accelerated aging for studying people on Earth.” From the report:
The mini organs launched aboard commercial resupply mission CRS-35 on Tuesday morning from Cape Canaveral Space Force Station in Florida. They are expected to arrive at the International Space Station (ISS) on Thursday. The miniature organs offer researchers a unique opportunity to simulate aging in a much shorter period of time to understand disease and develop treatments. “Six months in space … is equivalent to about 10 to 20 years of aging on Earth,” Kevin Costa, associate professor of surgery at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, told ABC News.

Sachs and Costa are sending up to 16 miniature hearts to the ISS to test how they respond to electrical signals and monitor how they may react to near-zero gravity. The technology, which is integrated into a miniature laboratory called CubeLab, was developed by Space Tango and simulates the natural environment in the human body. "[It is] slightly bigger than a shoebox, and it is a fully automated, miniaturized system,” Gentry Barnett, chief technology officer at Space Tango, told ABC News.

[…] As part of the new effort, the team is sending miniature brains, called miBrain, to the ISS. Around the size of a peppercorn, the miBrains reflect models of healthy and diseased brains. By exposing them to the space environment, scientists can see how mini-brains respond and better understand why living in space accelerates aging. Though the mini organs are not full-sized human organs, the researchers say they are good substitutes, cost-effective and don’t take up much of the limited space aboard the space station. They also believe discoveries made in space can translate to uses in everyday medical care.

The microgravity environment uniquely allows researchers to study what happens to humans with a sedentary lifestyle or prolonged bed rest, which isn’t easily simulated on Earth, Sachs explained. "[The research is] translating to stuff in space, but it’s also translating back to the research we do in the laboratory to help people with Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s disease,” Joel Blanchard, associate professor of stem cell biology and regenerative medicine and neuroscience at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, told ABC News. Lisa Carnell, the director of the biological and physical sciences division at NASA, told ABC News that these experiments serve as a starting point for future research beyond low Earth orbit, including to the moon and beyond.

Investors

By fluffernutter • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread
Don’t we know what happens to people working and living in space by having people working and living in space? People complain about experiments for the sake of attracting investors, this seems like it.

Re:Mini?

By jfdavis668 • • Score: 4, Informative • Thread
They could play the Blue Danube Waltz while they are docking.

Schools Across US Protest FCC Plan That Could Disconnect Kids From Internet

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica:
Schools and libraries from around the U.S. pleaded with the Federal Communications Commission to drop the idea of ending E-Rate, a $2 billion-a-year program that connects students and library visitors to the Internet. FCC Chairman Brendan Carr has criticized school districts for having “experimented with a massive increase in screen time for students,” and said E-Rate expanded too far beyond its original purpose of “supporting basic Internet access to schools and libraries for educational purposes.” In June, Carr led a 2-1 vote to issue a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) seeking public comment on whether E-Rate should be “limited or sunset to reflect today’s extensive connectivity rates.”

Carr’s proposal could result in E-Rate cutting the discounts that schools and libraries receive for telecom services and equipment, and imposing more restrictions on how E-Rate money can be used. The FCC seeking comment on whether to sunset the program also raises the possibility that Carr might choose to axe E-Rate entirely. The National Association of Elementary School Principals told the FCC that it “strongly supports the continued operation of the E-Rate program and urges the Commission to reject proposals that would eliminate, substantially restrict, or impose new conditions on this essential source of connectivity assistance for schools and libraries.” The Carr FCC already scaled E-Rate back last year by ending funding for schools and libraries to lend out Wi-Fi hotspots and for Wi-Fi service on school buses.
“Importantly, the FCC does not have the authority to terminate the E-Rate program. The E-Rate program is mandated by Congress, and the FCC is responsible for administering it,” the American Library Associated told the FCC.

The American Library Association said “the FCC lacks the authority and expertise to regulate screen time or determine educational outcomes.” In a filing, the group pointed out that under U.S. law, determinations about what content is inappropriate for children “shall be made by the school board, local educational agency, library, or other authority responsible for making the determination.”

Re:Two more years

By maladroit • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

The Trump administration is trying to strip the US citizenship of a member of Congress in an absolutely reprehensible attack on free speech and basic rights:
https://www.wsj.com/politics/p…
https://www.aljazeera.com/news…

It’s not surprising that people do not want to openly criticize this administration.

Re:Does it matter if the FCC has the power to end?

By ArchieBunker • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Strange how the FCC was powerless to do anything under Biden and yet today it can do whatever it wants.

Re: Two more years

By jenningsthecat • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

Really? That thing that happens all the time across the media is something people are afraid to do?

LMGTFY: (PDF warning) https://www.congress.gov/119/m…

Additionally, you only need to look as far as Jimmy Kimmel, 60 Minutes, or several other high-profile instances in which the Turmp government has gone after people critical of them. Maybe a little intellectual honesty on your part would be appropriate?

To some extent I get people who have their heads in the sand. But I’ll NEVER understand people who ignore clear and prominent evidence while willfully and stubbornly keeping their heads up their own asses.

Re: Two more years

By fluffernutter • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread
It’s not just high profile either. They have gone after Reddit users. They attack people with bogus lawsuits.

Re:Two more years

By maladroit • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

You are completely wrong about the law here, asshole. Please go away.

For anyone else who has read this far down in the thread, what is being alleged is that Ilhan Omar was actually 18, not 17, when her father applied for US citizenship for the family. If she was 18, she should have filed a separate application.

There are multiple problems with the government pursuing a denaturalization case here:
- It’s based on a lie - somebody made up the original claim of knowing when she was born.
- It’s impossible to prove anything. Somalia was in the midst of a civil war, there are no records.
- The alleged fraud would have been by her deceased father, not her - he’s the one who filed the application.
- IT DOES NOT MATTER.

The last point is especially important. The written law and case law for denaturalization is unambiguous: after someone becomes a citizen, the government must demonstrate that any mistaken or fraudulent information would have been significant and material. The state must PROVE that an application would have been almost instantly rejected if the information had been complete.

The only cases where denaturalization has been applied in the past has been for things like former concentration camp guards and direct participants in terrorist organizations.

The facts in this case do not come even close to to what the law requires. In fact, the evidence is that even if she had filed an application as an 18-year-old, it would have been approved.

This entire case is because Stephen Miller and Trump wanted to attack her. Anyone claiming otherwise is an idiot.

Eight US States Sue OpenAI, Claiming ChatGPT Harms Young Users

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Eight US states, including Kansas, Arizona, and Montana, have sued OpenAI, alleging that ChatGPT encourages children to harm themselves. The states are seeking changes to how the company’s products interact with young users and the forfeiture of profits generated from their activity. Reuters reports:
Attorneys general from the states, which include Iowa, Kansas and Arizona, filed the lawsuits independently in state courts, claiming ChatGPT is designed to be agreeable and engaging to earn the trust of users. But the chatbot reinforces delusions, encourages dangerous behavior and assists users in planning violence like mass shootings, the lawsuits claim. The lawsuits represent the most significant coordinated state action against an artificial intelligence company, adding to a wave of legal challenges OpenAI faces as it prepares for a public listing. Florida’s attorney general filed the first such state suit in June.

The lawsuits accuse the company of violating state consumer protection laws by misleading users about the safety of ChatGPT. The states also allege that the company created a public nuisance by endangering the health of their residents. The lawsuits seek orders forcing OpenAI to make changes to how ChatGPT works. Among other things, the states want the company barred from developing AI models that can improve themselves unless it can ensure those models are aligned with human values. The states … are also seeking civil monetary penalties for OpenAI’s violations of state law as well as damages.

“aligned with human values”

By CommunityMember • • Score: 3, Interesting • Thread
Whose values? Asking for a friend.

Re:Dear residents

By sound+vision • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Are you sure it’s the residents orchestrating this? Politicians have pulled the wool over my eyes with “think of the children” too many times to believe that. This smells less like earthen grass-roots and more like a smokescreen decreed from the top-down to make the politicians appear to be “reigning in Big Tech” without having to actually do that.

I mean, yeah

By T34L • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread
I don’t really care for the crocodile tears about “the children” coming from some of the States seemingly trying to make their children lives hell competitively, but

the states want the company barred from developing AI models that can improve themselves unless it can ensure those models are aligned with human values.

I think this is a very reasonable legal requirement to ask of someone who keeps repeatedly publicly claiming that they’re concerned about the potential of their own models to spin out of control and destroy humanity. If you, as a company, keep insisting you’re doing something fundamentally hazardous to the entirely of humanity, you should be probably be legally bound to avoid doing that. Even if you were lying through your ass in the first place.

Whose human values?

By CustomBuild • • Score: 3 • Thread

If OpenAI knew the chatbot was giving dangerous advice to kids while telling parents it was safe, that’s something I’d want dragged into daylight. Show the conversations, the marketing claims, and what the company did when problems were reported. The allegations need evidence, and that evidence deserves scrutiny. The proposed restriction on self-improving models until they align with “human values” sounds awfully open-ended, though. Have these people attended a school board meeting? Getting the humans to agree on human values would be a useful first step.

I want safety requirements somebody can actually test. Handing officials the power to decide whether a model has acceptable values seems like something we’d regret as soon as a different set of officials takes office.

Microsoft Defender Now Supports Linux Desktops

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
“Starting today, Linux desktops are now officially supported by Microsoft Defender,” reports Neowin. A public preview of the threat detection app extends its enterprise security platform beyond servers to developer workstations running distributions such as Ubuntu, Debian, Fedora, and RHEL. The offering includes antivirus protection, endpoint detection and response, vulnerability management, threat hunting, and device isolation. From the report:
Microsoft is also making it easier to onboard desktops through streamlined methods, offering a unified security operations experience, strengthened security, and improved response times. Organizations that are already familiar with securing Linux servers via Defender should feel right at home securing desktops too, as the experience is exactly the same. Defender knows whether it is securing a device in a data center, the cloud, or that it is owned by a developer and identifies them as such in inventory and security workflows.

As stated previously, all Linux server distros are supported via Defender on desktops too. These include RHEL, CentOS, Ubuntu, Debian, SLES, Fedora, and Oracle Linux, GNOME, KDE, and more. That said, you do need Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Plan 2 or a Microsoft 365 E5 and E7 subscription. You can enroll Defender on workstations using the same deployment methods you use for servers, but do check out the prerequisites here.

Details

By SlashbotAgent • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

It is important to note that this article is referring to Microsoft Defender the enterprise security suite and not Windows Defender the antivirus software built into Windows. Microsoft Defender is a suite that includes central management and reporting, EDR, DLP, email filtering and more. In contrast Windows defender is a limited antivirus component of the Microsoft Defender suite.

Windows Defender isn’t bad. It’s not the best, at the moment, but it’s not bad at all. On Windows.

I cannot see myself installing Microsoft Defender or Windows Defender on Linux. But, I can see companies subscribed to the M365 platform being forced to install Microsoft Defender for insurance and compliance purposes. If I had to, I guess I’d prefer to be able to add Linux to the existing security suite, rather than having to manage another platform for Linux support.

Therefore I’m declaring Microsoft Defender for Linux as a good thing. I’ll allow it.

Re:Details

By OrangAsm • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
“Enterprise” seems to be an enabler of all kinds of bullshit.

Re:Details

By thegarbz • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

What bullshit? The word enterprise should literally be translated to mean “It doesn’t affect me personally, and is only relevant if my company is a Microsoft shop, in which case we already pay millions to subscription bullshit.”

The reality is Defender is an enterprise suite. If you use it you use it, if you don’t you don’t. All this is doing is making it MORE LIKELY enterprises can adopt Linux if you are using it.

Re: Why would I want this?

By Junta • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

I meant infested, not invested

Re: Why would I want this?

By AmiMoJo • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

It’s an external requirement in many cases. For contractual or legal reasons they need AV software on all machines, if it makes sense or not.

It’s how utter crap like McAffee survives. It may be shit, but it fulfils a business need. Checks the box.

Epic Games’ New Vibe-Coded Launcher Is 46% Faster Than Steam

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Epic has launched a preview of a new AI-generated Games Launcher that it says cold-starts 46% faster than Steam. Neowin reports:
Epic commissioned a third-party company to benchmark this new launcher in its current Preview build versus the Steam client on Windows machines. The results reported that Epic’s client is 46% faster than Valve’s client during cold starts, clocking in at 5.47 seconds compared to Steam taking 10.07 seconds. When you restore both apps from system tray background states, the new client takes 0.36 seconds while Steam takes 0.42 seconds, according to the report.
Speed aside, Epic says the new launcher gets a better interface, dedicated title summary pages, and custom top bars. “The updated client also lets players aggregate external PC game libraries, toggle between grid or list views, and monitor storage write rates alongside download queues,” reports Neowin.
Epic Games says Fortnite will finally come to Linux through this new client once Easy Anti-Cheat is rebuilt and kernel-level security agreements are established with major Linux distros.

Hmmm

By CEC-P • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
But the “developers,” and I use that term very loosely, don’t know what the code does or why it does it. And they want me to run it? No thanks. Also, way too many creeps working in upper management at that company.

No thank you sir, I don’t like it.

By cephalien • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

It starts faster…

What ELSE does it do?

Nobody knows.

They ‘vibe’ coded it.

How long until it ‘vibe’ steals your credit card info?

The real question …

By keltor • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread
Who closes Steam?

K…

By locater16 • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread
I’m sure the FPS advantage will deliver me victory on my “opening an app” world tournament results that everyone will be watching.

stop calling it that.

By redback • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

vibe coding is now cuck coding. because you just sit in a chair and watch.

US Tech Giants Warn Europe That Data Sovereignty Requirements Could Cost $128 Billion

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
A study commissioned by CCIA Europe, whose members include Amazon, Google, and Meta, estimates that the EU’s proposed Cloud and AI Development Act could impose 115 billion euros ($128 billion) in costs over a decade as governments and companies migrate workloads and rewrite software. The figure is more than six times the European Commission’s upper estimate. However, roughly 80 billion euros ($89 billion) of it comes from a modeled scenario assuming sovereignty rules are extended to 25% of cloud workloads in essential private-sector industries.The Register reports:
The report specifically targets Article 31 of the proposed legislation, which it says could allow the Commission to extend sovereignty requirements into essential private-sector services. CCIA argues that forcing businesses to move away from existing cloud infrastructure could trigger expensive software redevelopment projects, with code rewriting and re-architecting accounting for 69 percent of its estimated costs.

Luxembourg would apparently take the biggest hit, with the study putting the cost at 1,711 euros per worker over ten years. Denmark (905 euros), Austria (900 euros), and Finland (864 euros) also face hefty bills, as does Ireland (856 euros), which hosts the European headquarters of several US tech giants. CCIA is urging EU governments to overhaul the proposed legislation, limit sovereignty restrictions to sensitive workloads, and abandon requirements based on corporate origin or personnel nationality in favor of what it calls risk-based technical safeguards.

“Member States cannot rely on the Commission’s incomplete estimates when deciding CADA’s strict sovereignty requirements for cloud and AI providers,” said Mitchell Rutledge, CCIA Europe’s policy manager. “Taxpayers and businesses will foot the bill, yet the official assessment missed 70 percent of CADA’s true impact.” For AWS and Google, offering European customers greater control over their data also helps retain business that might otherwise migrate to European competitors. It’s a rather convenient arrangement: sell customers sovereignty on one hand, while an industry association representing your interests warns governments against imposing too much of it on the other.

Exactly WHO will it cost?

By pla • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
If Facebook wants access to European users, Facebook will be paying for EU-based data centers to comply. Same goes for Amazon, Google, and the rest.

This isn’t a condemnation, it’s an admission by the Megalomaniacal Seven that they have zero interest in building out EU versions of the very infrastructure their “services” require; an admission that the money is only supposed to flow in one direction, and it ain’t East.

Re:hmmmm

By F.Ultra • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

Europeans: hey US companies, you gotta keep all the data inside EU borders and only Europeans can control it”.

That was the old way, since then EU noticed that US companies will still send the data to the US government if they ask so the new way is not involve any US company at all regardless of where they have their datacenters.

Everything leading up to the Cloud Act

By kalieaire • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread
there’s a specific 2013 drug trafficking warrant in nyc (represent!) that snowballed into a legal bomb that caused what we’re seeing here today

federal prosecutors used a domestic warrant to demand a suspect’s emails from microsoft. microsoft said nahh, make me, because the data was physically stored in their in ireland data centers and that american warrants do not work on foreign soil. to get evidence abroad prosecutors were supposed to use og diplomatic treaties (agreements between countries to help each other look for clues). but that system was a bureaucratic nightmare that routinely took 10 to 24 months. frustrated by a system too slow for the internet age, the doj took microsoft all the way to the supreme court.

instead of modernizing international treaties to fix how global investigations work, the us congress took a shitty shortcut by making a new law.

in 2018, they passed the cloud act (a law that ignores physical borders entirely and fks w/ sovereignty). the new law said that if a tech company is based in the usa, it must hand over data under its control no matter where in the world the servers are located. this meant american tech companies had to comply. they either had to comply with a US warrant and face massive digital privacy fines in EU for illegal data transfers, or refuse the warrant and face contempt of court back home.

because the int’l community never built a functional system for digital evidence, EU is now playing D. realizing that US providers control roughly 70% of their cloud tech (and that the USA claims legal power over all of it) the EU is pushing for data sovereignty (keeping data strictly under their own control and laws). rather than fixing international police cooperation, regulators are choosing to financially decouple. this means a multi-billion-dollar effort to strip out US big tech dependencies and wall off EU data from foreign reach.

so basically to go back to the way things were before but for $129 billion more.

tbh, they could just force tech companies to decouple from US interests instead like the US forced Tiktok to move ownership from singapore to the usa.

Re: Half the analysis

By Kernel Kurtz • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

Also, all that money will be going into European pockets. For the longest time all those funds were spent on foreign companies with hardly any footprint in Europe.

I’m personally seeing the effect in Belgium, with companies in my field popping up like mushrooms in autumn. It used to be difficult finding a decent job over here, because my specialty was only in demand by US companies that weren’t hiring in Europe. All that is changing,and so I think the money is well spent.

Kind of ironic that Trump’s whole spiel is that he thinks he is going to bring more jobs back to America, but he himself is a huge red flag to the world about the abject hazard of doing business with Americans.

Math time

By thegarbz • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

$128 billion over a decade is $12.8billion per year. Divide over 27 countries, and… under $500m/year? That sounds cheaper than a single Oracle project.

Google Is Silently Linking Your Phone Number Across All Signed-In Accounts

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Google has made Android’s phone-number verification opt-out, automatically verifying and associating a device’s phone number with every Google account signed in on that phone, including secondary and work accounts. Android Authority reports:
As spotted in a recent Reddit thread, users report receiving confirmation emails out of the blue from “noreply-phone-verification@google.com” stating that their phone number has been verified. The feature, known in Google settings as “Phone number verification,” links your active phone number across all Google accounts signed in on the same phone, including secondary profiles, work accounts, and throwaway handles.

Google’s support documentation has long noted that it periodically re-verifies your device’s phone number to keep communication and recovery features up to date. However, this support page was updated sometime between August and October 2025 to add this rather aggressive behavior of turning on phone number verification by default, as well as adding all phone numbers to all Google accounts signed in on the device.
To disable automatic phone number verification on Android, open your phone’s Settings app, tap Google, and select the All Services tab. Under Privacy & Security, find Phone number verification and turn off Verify phone numbers automatically.
"[T]urning off the phone number verification toggle only prevents future linking,” notes the report. “If Google has already attached your number across secondary accounts, you will need to open your Google Account Personal Info page, head to Contact info > Phone, and manually remove the number from each profile where it doesn’t belong.” Is this conversation helpful so far?

AI Summary

By JakFrost • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

@BeauHD seems like he’s leaning into AI headfirst from behind judging by his closing sentence cut and pasta from AI.

“Is this conversation helpful so far?”

Is this conversation helpful so far?

By ScwB • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
Seriously? Can’t even remove the obvious AI portion of this copy/paste?

Re:How?

By Locke2005 • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread
I use my gmail address to log into many apps, so they know my phone number. The problem is that some stranger with a similar name keeps using my gmail address to create accounts. So when I creating an account for a DoorDash pickup today, the app decided I was Elizabeth H, and my food was labeled Elizabeth H, and the guy at the counter argued that the old cis male in front of him didn’t really look like an Elizabeth… I had the same problem with my Best Buy account, I can’t use my gmail address to login to that because Elizabeth already has her account linked to my email address. Unfortunately, she hasn’t left a credit card active for that account. One time someone no Etsy used my email address and was foolish enough to leave her credit card attached. So she received a surprise: poop soap delivered to her door! The data collectors can figure out a lot about you by aggregating data from multiple sources, so they do know your phone number, and can link it indirectly to you email.

No point removing it.

By devslash0 • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

It’s obvious that once you have a phone number associated with an account, Google won’t forget that association no matter what, even if you delete the number from an account. A connection has been made and will forever linger in their graphs. The only difference is that you won’t see it.

Enshitification didn’t get attention

By NotEmmanuelGoldstein • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
With Android 17, the wi-fi button on the notification panel (drag-down from top of screen) no longer switches-off the wi-fi: It puts the wi-fi into a receive-only state, indicated by a black icon (which previously indicated “off”).

To switch-off wi-fi, one must tap the right side of the wi-fi button and slide the wi-fi toggle to “off”. The black icon will display a diagonal line through the wi-fi symbol.

Also, the Mobile Data button (data over the phone service) was moved to page 3 of the notification panel. It now displays a pop-up, demanding confirmation of the activation.

Anthropic Warns Small AI Models Could Self-Replicate Through IoT Devices

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica:
AI company Anthropic is warning that advances in small AI models could soon usher in a new era of self-replicating malware that’s capable of infecting smart fridges, vacuum cleaners, and a wide range of other Internet-of-things devices and is more resistant to takedown. By next year, smaller AI models may be able to autonomously self-replicate on all kinds of IoT devices, the company said. Eventually, the capability could enable computer worms, which propagate without requiring human interaction and are capable of infecting unfamiliar IoT devices. An experiment the company performed recently revealed significant challenges in bringing such an AI malware replicator to fruition, so the finding is necessarily tempered. Still, the results do raise concerns about the possibility of new forms of computer worms.

Anthropic further warned not only about the new potential malware, but also that it could be difficult to stop. In its blog post, it wrote that “a replicator like this would be challenging to shut down, since there’s no centralized point to shut off — though it may be slow (with a doubling time of days). Unlike non-AI malware, it could also figure out unfamiliar devices on its own.” Smaller AI models require much less powerful hardware to run than do frontier models. Anthropic ran small open-weight models on real or simulated low-cost, off-brand Android TV boxes and other types of IoT hardware. Company researchers found that by using quantization to represent the models using fewer bits and splitting the workloads into “shards” running on each device, the models were able to establish inference, meaning that the model weights loaded and could generate output.

[…] This finding was the starting point for further research that asked: Would it be possible for small models to create self-replicating infections that run themselves on IoT devices the way traditional IoT worms, like Mirai, install DDoS code and other payloads? Unlike Mirai, these AI worms could pose a much higher threat, since the models could tailor exploits and payloads dynamically, depending on the target. Once such an infection chain began, it might also be harder for defenders to stop it. “Such an ‘AI worm’ could carry its model weights with it as it reproduces (or re-download them from a public hub), and then run inference directly on compromised hardware,” Anthropic said. “Effectively, the weights would become part of the malware payload.”
Further reading: Anthropic Bans Cruelty Toward Claude

another day

By hjf • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

another day, another AI company “warning”

you gotta PUMP THAT BUBBLE!

Of course that’s nonsense

By Casandro • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

I mean even small models are Gigabytes in size, while big IoT devices have perhaps a single Gigabyte of storage and most systems are measured in Megabytes.

And that’s even unrelated to the question of why a system with no agency would do it?

It’s all pumping up hype with almost no connection to reality.

Somebody feels threatened

By DarkOx • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

This step one in the inevitable campaign against open models and FOSS agent/harness systems.

These bit AI labs are better but for Joe public gpt-oss/qwen3.8/deepseek/granite4 are good enough for a lot of stuff. All of them will work on $600 GPU installed in PC from this decade. The open models will only improve, the layered specialist models will become more efficent. The GPU hardware and memory prices will come down eventually.

$200+/monthly subscripts just are not going to make economic sense for the majority of personal and general office worker users. - That is unless Anthropic/OpenAI/X can keep self hosted AI out of the public’s hands.

Re:Of course that’s nonsense

By PPH • • Score: 4, Informative • Thread

Distributed computing. Like SETI@home. Your color-changing lightbulb might not be able to host the entire model. But there are a lot of lightbulbs in your neighborhood.

why a system with no agency would do it?

Because the LLMs are self assembling a mesh network. Not every node needs agency, only the peripheral nodes. Like someone’s pacemaker. Do what we want or your granny gets The Big One!

They have realized that society is becoming ill at ease over AI. And they are creating a safety net for themselves.

Wait smart devices are bad?

By Murdoch5 • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread
There is a simple solution to prevent the IoT take over, stop connecting everything to the network. My fridge, oven, stove, microwave, dishwasher, washing machine, drier, coffee maker, bed, air purifier, and so on, don’t need network connectivity. For the devices that benefit from a network connection, why would they let random anything run? The simple solution is to sign and enclave / jail all network accessible interfaces, and make sure the hashes and signatures all match before execution, with monitoring so they can shut out anything that shouldn’t be running.

Google Play Now Lets Anyone Build Private, Vibe-Coded Apps That Run On Android

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Google Play is adding support for private personal Android apps, allowing users to build an app with tools like Google AI Studio and run it on their own devices without publishing it publicly to the Play Store. “These personal apps won’t show up in Google Play’s search or listing pages, and won’t be shared with anyone except for the app’s creator,” reports TechCrunch. From the report:
The idea comes as more people are experimenting with building their own applications via AI for specific, personal needs. However, being able to use that app on their own Android device has meant publishing to Google Play, making it accessible to the Play Store’s some 3 billion users. That led many to limit their vibe-coding efforts to web apps that could run on any device instead of something built natively for Android.

Now, Google says Android device owners can vibe-code an app using Google AI Studio, then launch it for their own use. These apps are still required to comply with Google Play’s existing policies but allow users to experiment more directly with building apps for Android. Initially, the feature will be available to users in the U.S., age 18 and up.

[…] In the months ahead, the company said that users will be able to share their vibe-coded creations with a network of trusted friends. That means the apps you built for family or friends, or maybe your child’s T-ball league, could be used with a small group of people, without having to go public on the Play Store. And if the app ever really becomes popular, there will be a way to shift the personal app to one that’s published on the Google Play Store for everyone to try, after completing the trust and safety reviews.

Well, then…

By dskoll • • Score: 3 • Thread

That totally validates Google’s locking down of the Android ecosystem and its requirement that all developers register with Google. Why, could you imagine the security implications otherwise????

/s

Get fucked

By drinkypoo • • Score: 3 • Thread

“These apps are still required to comply with Google Play’s existing policies”

Google wants to be Apple SO BAD, but they don’t have the cachet, only the user unfriendliness.

Pass.

By GeekWithAKnife • • Score: 3 • Thread
I can already create private apps for android. Adding the option with Google terms isn’t helping.

What? Everything in this is wrong.

By Zelucifer • • Score: 3 • Thread

Anyone can build an app and install it on their own android device, unless you’re running one of the few Android builds that disables sideloading. That’s how, virtually, every app designer tests their app. Yes you can run an emulator, but you also want to test it on a real phone.

Netflix Cuts About 6% of Jobs In Biggest Layoffs Since 2022

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot
Netflix is laying off about 1,000 employees, or 6% of its workforce, in its largest round of cuts since 2022. The company says its business remains strong, but it is facing growing pressure from YouTube, TikTok, and other rivals. Reuters reports:
The bulk of the job cuts would be in Netflix’s product, tech, legal and human-resources teams, the email Co-CEOs Greg Peters and Ted Sarandos sent to employees on Wednesday showed.

“Our mission — to entertain the world — is ambitious, and delivering on it requires us to be disciplined about where we prioritize our people âand resources,” they said in the memo. “Our business is strong and growing, and we remain on track to deliver our full-year forecast.”

Yall are still subscribed?

By HnT • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

I am honestly wondering who is still subbed to Netflix? If I want Golden-Age-of-TV quality, Netflix definitely does not offer it. If I just want mindnumbing motion pictures, YouTube seems the much better choice.
Seriously, WTF are you watching on Netflix these days? Cant even watch old movies anymore either.
It has become entirely pointless, then completely ideologically captured like all pseudo-entertainment providers shortly before mass-layoffs and eventual collapse.