Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Commonwealth Fusion Makes the Physics Case For Its 400 MW Reactor
  2. NASA Announces Astronauts For Its Artemis III Mission
  3. FCC Wants To Kill Burner Phones By Forcing Telecoms To Get All Customers’ IDs
  4. US Labels BYD, Baidu, Alibaba and Other Tech Giants As Aiding China’s Military
  5. EU Orders Meta To Open WhatsApp To Rival AI Chatbots
  6. Anthropic Releases Claude Fable, a ‘Safe’ Version of Mythos
  7. High-Severity Vulnerability In Linux Caused By a Single Errant Character
  8. EU Says Decision Not to Launch Siri AI in Europe Is Apple’s Alone
  9. Meta Will Use Your Activity On Other Websites To Personalize Your Feeds
  10. Microsoft Hacked To Deliver Malware To Claude and Gemini Users
  11. NHS Prescribes Half a Million Copilot Licenses For Its Paperwork Headache
  12. UK PM Gives Tech Firms Ultimatum To Block Explicit Images on Children’s Phones
  13. Tests Suggest Russian Satellites Can Jam GPS On a Continental Scale
  14. Donut Lab’s ‘Solid-State’ Battery Exposed As Regular Li-Ion
  15. ‘Severe’ Stress On Oceans As Rate of Sea Level Rise Doubles In 10 Years, UN Warns

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Commonwealth Fusion Makes the Physics Case For Its 400 MW Reactor

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Commonwealth Fusion has published five peer-reviewed papers laying out the physics case for ARC, its planned 400 MW fusion power plant, which would follow the company’s smaller SPARC tokamak now under construction. The papers suggest ARC could produce more energy than it consumes using high-temperature superconducting magnets, molten-salt heat extraction, and 15-minute fusion pulses. Ars Technica reports:
ARC will be a tokamak that hosts fusion between hydrogen’s two heavier isotopes, deuterium and tritium. This reaction results in a helium nucleus and releases a neutron and radiation. The helium transfers heat to the plasma, maintaining the conditions needed for fusion, but it is otherwise a waste product, referred to as “ash” in the fusion context. The neutron and radiation, however, are put to use. Part of that use is simply imparting energy into a blanket of molten salt that surrounds the fusion chamber. That energy, in the form of heat, will be used to drive a turbine that produces the electricity. The molten salt includes lithium ions; when one lithium isotope absorbs a neutron, it decays into more helium, plus tritium that can be used as fuel for the reactor. There are isotopes present that will also release additional neutrons, allowing this process to generate sufficient fuel.

Overall, the present design of ARC is expected to produce about 1.13 GW of fusion power, with 500 MW of that extracted as electricity. Some of that (100 MW) will be needed to power the plant’s operations, leaving 400 MW to be sent to the grid. The rest of the energy is either kept in the tokamak to maintain the fusion reactions or lost due to inefficiencies in the heat and energy transfer of the system. There’s a lot of uncertainty about these numbers; the 1.13 GW is just the center of a range of potential values running from 900 MW to 1.3 GW, so the 400 MW output may need to be adjusted up or down accordingly.

Some of that 400 MW comes during periods where fusion is not occurring. The nuclear reactions will occur within 15-minute-long periods that will be interspersed with one minute resets. The resets are meant to be kept short enough that nothing has much of a chance to cool down before it gets heated up again — thermal inertia will let it continue generating power. That will be one of the key differentiators with SPARC, which doesn’t have the heat extraction needed to maintain stable fusion for these long time periods, and so can’t maintain the near constant temperatures needed for reliable power generation.

It’s inevitable that parts of the device will be exposed to radiation and perhaps fusion plasma. The inner walls of the reactor will be shielded by tungsten, which will limit erosion by the conditions. Meanwhile, the vacuum vessel is designed to be replaced every one to two years. The papers note that this flexibility will allow them to make some design changes even after ARC is built. To enable this, the whole tokamak is meant to split in half for maintenance.

NASA Announces Astronauts For Its Artemis III Mission

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
NASA has named Randy Bresnik, Luca Parmitano, Frank Rubio, and Andre Douglas as the crew for Artemis III, which has been reworked from a moon-landing mission into a roughly two-week Earth-orbit test of lunar landers being built by SpaceX and Blue Origin. NBC News reports:
Randy Bresnik, Luca Parmitano, Frank Rubio and Andre Douglas are expected to launch into Earth orbit next year, with the goal of testing two commercially developed lunar landers that are slated to carry astronauts to the surface of the moon during the Artemis IV mission in 2028. Bresnik will be the mission’s commander, with Parmitano, an Italian astronaut with the European Space Agency, serving as the pilot. Douglas and Rubio will be mission specialists, and Bob Hines will train with the crew as a backup member. “This test flight will enable us to prove we can carry out highly choreographed operations with our partners across hardware interfaces, software propulsion systems and life support elements with crew in the high-stakes space environment,” Jeremy Parsons, NASA’s Artemis program manager, said during NASA’s announcement on Tuesday.

Bresnik has been to the International Space Station twice, most recently as commander of an expedition in 2017. A retired U.S. Marine colonel, he was selected as a NASA astronaut in 2004. Bresnik has helped oversee development and testing of spacecraft for the Artemis program as an assistant to the chief of the Astronaut Office, which manages astronaut training and operations. Parmitano has also done two stints on the ISS and served as commander of an expedition in 2019. He has completed a total of six spacewalks and also performed the first live DJ set in orbit. Before becoming an astronaut, Parmitano was a test pilot for the Italian air force.

For Rubio, a physician with 28 years of service in the Army, Artemis III will be his second trip to space. From 2022 to 2023, he spent 371 days on the space station, breaking the record for longest-duration spaceflight by an American, according to NASA. Douglas is the only crew member making his spaceflight debut. An engineer who previously worked on space exploration and robotics at Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Lab, he became a NASA astronaut in 2022. Douglas was the backup crew member for the Artemis II mission around the moon earlier this year. He told NBC News in an interview after Tuesday’s announcement that the role had at times been a challenge. “It was hard to figure out how do you balance getting ready to go, not go, all that stuff,” he said. “But to go now is just fantastic.”

FCC Wants To Kill Burner Phones By Forcing Telecoms To Get All Customers’ IDs

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from 404 Media:
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) wants to make it effectively impossible for people to buy what many call burner phones — a phone not explicitly linked to your identity at the point of purchase — which would impact privacy-conscious people, to domestic abuse survivors, to journalists, and many more. The FCC plans to do this by legally forcing the country’s telecoms to store a wealth of personal information about essentially all phone customers, including a government issued identification number and their physical address, alarming privacy advocates and civil rights activists who compare the measures to those from authoritarian countries where it can be difficult to buy a mobile phone plan without giving up your identity.

The proposed change would drastically shake up how people obtain phone plans in the U.S., and have all sorts of privacy and cybersecurity knock-on effects. The FCC is proposing the data collection partly as a way to combat scammers, with telecoms being required to collect other information on business and foreign customers like the intended use case of their bulk phone plan purchase and their IP address. But the changes would mean telecoms collect data on all new and renewing customers, and the FCC provides a long list of other things that the collected data could help authorities with.

In a synopsis of the proposed changes, the FCC writes, “Specifically, we seek comment on requiring originating providers to, at a minimum, obtain and retain the name, physical address, government issued identification number, and an alternate telephone number of any new and renewing customer before granting access to its services.” The goal of collecting this data, the FCC writes, is to deter some scammers from getting onto a telecom network in the first place, and so “enforcers will be better able to identify the scammers when they do.” The FCC compares the changes to the sort of data collected by banks to prevent money laundering.

One section stresses that the newly collected data would help “law enforcement to more easily identify callers that use the network to perpetuate crimes by ensuring that voice providers have accurate and complete customer information.” It goes on to ask if the data would help identify people buying and selling illicit goods; the investigation of “fraud, espionage, or influence operations that undermine national security”, and “address abuse in text messaging networks.” “Criminals continue to leverage the anonymity provided by phone calls and texts to defraud Americans and exploit communications networks to further other crimes,” one section reads.
“For decades, civil libertarians have looked overseas at authoritarian countries where the government requires people to register to get a mobile phone to ensure they can be tracked. We never thought that would happen here,” Jay Stanley, senior policy analyst at the American Civil Liberties Union’s (ACLU) Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project told 404 Media in an email. “But make no mistake: with this rulemaking, the government is contemplating taking away people’s ability to get a burner phone, which will hurt low-income people, domestic violence victims, and anyone else who cares about their privacy.”

This is how dumb government agencies are

By Slashythenkilly • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Criminals dont follow the rules, use their own names, or care how long it takes as long it takes as the message gets there. By making burner phones illegal, they are simply creating a market(sound familiar?) whereby associates or tech savy groups will funnel or create new devices. Phones are illegal in prisons yet anyone with cash can get one. You dont even need a phone if you can access the internet and no ID is required for that.

Re:Every single movement you make will be tracked

By taustin • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

If you have a cell phone, every single movement you make is already tracked.

Realistically, this will affect very few people, because the overwhelming majority of people who have phones, which is nearly everyone, is already providing that personal data to the phone company. Most people simply don’t care because they feel no need to hide anything.

Where it makes a difference is the very small number of people who do feel they have to hide something. Some for good reasons, some for bad reasons, and in many cases, which depends on who you ask.

Re:Privacy is long since gone

By taustin • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Only Linux installs without an email address and phone number for 2FA and password recovery.

That isn’t actually true. The only one, perhaps (and I doubt that, but I haven’t played with, for instance, BSD, in quite a while) that does so by default, but even Windows can be installed without providing any identifying information if you know how. (Using it, of course, is another matter.)

Re:burner phone elsewhere will always exist …

By arglebargle_xiv • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

They also won’t impact their use by scammers:

Percentage of scammers affected by the proposed rule: 0%

Percentage of domestic abuse victims affected by the proposed rule: 100%

Not saying that this is deliberate, but that this is one of those simple, obvious solutions that’s completely wrong.

Re:Welcome!

By jiriw • Score: 5, Informative Thread

What are you talking about? Buying a phone without leaving personal details is possible at any electronics/computer/phone store in the Netherlands (country in Europe I live in). And pre-paid sim cards you can buy with cash in the supermarket.

US Labels BYD, Baidu, Alibaba and Other Tech Giants As Aiding China’s Military

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
The Pentagon has added Alibaba, BYD, Baidu, Unitree, and other Chinese companies to its list of firms it says support China’s military, barring them from U.S. defense contracts. The companies and China’s embassy deny the allegations. The Associated Press reports:
Created in 2021 by a congressional mandate, the list (PDF) seeks to identify Chinese companies that the Pentagon considers to have links to the Chinese military — not only those directly controlled by the Chinese military and security forces but also those contributing to the country’s defense industrial base. When updating the list last year, the Pentagon said the Chinese military sought to acquire advanced technologies and expertise developed by Chinese companies, universities and research programs that “appear to be civilian entities.”

The Chinese Embassy on Monday accused the U.S. of “overstretching the concept of national security and making discriminatory lists to go after Chinese companies.” It said Chinese companies observe the laws and regulations of the countries where they do business. “The U.S. should stop its wrong practice and create a fair, just and non-discriminatory environment for Chinese companies,” the embassy said in a statement. […] The Chinese Embassy on Monday accused the U.S. of “overstretching the concept of national security and making discriminatory lists to go after Chinese companies.” It said Chinese companies observe the laws and regulations of the countries where they do business. “The U.S. should stop its wrong practice and create a fair, just and non-discriminatory environment for Chinese companies,” the embassy said in a statement.

So what?

By crunchy_one • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
How many American companies have ties to the U.S. military-industrial complex?

What I heard is

By 93 Escort Wagon • Score: 3, Funny Thread

I heard that the Chinese Embassy on Monday accused the U.S. of “overstretching the concept of national security and making discriminatory lists to go after Chinese companies.” It said Chinese companies observe the laws and regulations of the countries where they do business. “The U.S. should stop its wrong practice and create a fair, just and non-discriminatory environment for Chinese companies,” the embassy said in a statement.

I also heard that the Chinese Embassy on Monday accused the U.S. of “overstretching the concept of national security and making discriminatory lists to go after Chinese companies.” It said Chinese companies observe the laws and regulations of the countries where they do business. “The U.S. should stop its wrong practice and create a fair, just and non-discriminatory environment for Chinese companies,” the embassy said in a statement.

Re:So what?

By caseih • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

US technology (military and civilian) companies have been and remain in a very dominant position compared to most other countries. So while the US has the luxury of banning foreign companies with ties to foreign militaries, few other countries have that luxury. Up until now, even with US military ties and probable spying that went with it, such deals were still fairly mutually beneficial. Now, though, the US government, and an increasing number of Americans, wants the world to bow down to their benefactor and turn everything over to them. I have no problem acknowledging the US’s powerful and dominant position. But when humility (even if it’s never been quite genuine) turns to pure, unadulterated pride and using their power to bully the world and demand more and more tribute , that’s when I start to be very concerned and start to wonder just which large power is more likely to rob me of freedom and the pursuit of happiness: China or the US. Should be an easy choice, and was even a few years ago. Now it’s very much not.

Cringe

By Ogive17 • Score: 3, Insightful Thread
I always cringe at these announcements from the current administration. And then I cringe at China’s scripted response, pretending they operate a free market and welcome competition.

uncanny

By noshellswill • Score: 3 Thread
When Chinese companies are NEWLY ascribed to supporting Chinese interests  something is not OKey. For the last 60 years, did any American need to be taught that all Chinese companies, investors and citizens pimp their own military … just like all USA citizens support our own military? This “surprise” discovery and assignment cannot be made in good faith.

EU Orders Meta To Open WhatsApp To Rival AI Chatbots

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
The European Commission has ordered Meta to temporarily restore free WhatsApp Business API access for rival AI chatbots while it investigates whether Meta’s ban on third-party assistants abuses its dominant position. Meta says it will appeal, calling the move “regulatory overreach” that would let major AI companies use a paid WhatsApp product for free. The BBC reports:
The EU said it began its investigation, in December 2025, after Meta banned third-party general-purpose AI assistants from the WhatsApp for Business API. It said that appeared to be an abuse of Meta’s dominant position in European markets. So, as an interim measure as its investigation continues, it has given Meta five working days to re-instate access for third-party general-purpose AI assistants to the WhatsApp for Business API under the same terms and conditions that were in place previously.

“In rapidly evolving markets, competition can be lost long before a final decision is adopted,” said Teresa Ribera, the Commission’s executive vice-president for clean, just and competitive transition. “This is why these interim measures will remain in place for the duration of the investigation.” She added the decision “preserved choice for citizens across Europe on the AI assistants they want to use with WhatsApp, without that decision being made for them.” The Commission said if Meta failed to comply with its interim decision it could be fined up to 10% up of its total turnover.
“The European Commission has decided that OpenAI and some of the largest companies in the world can use the paid-for WhatsApp Business product for free,” it said in a statement.
“This is regulatory overreach subsidized by the many European companies that pay. We will appeal.”

Missing the woods for the trees

By karmawarrior • Score: 3 Thread

With the EU everything is a “competition” issue and requires “opening up”.

I’m surprised they haven’t demanded the Mafia allow rival protection rackets to compete with them.

Re:Missing the woods for the trees

By Local ID10T • Score: 5, Funny Thread

The Mafia is protected under “cultural heritage” .

Anti-trust laws being enforced! Such a bother!

By gweihir • Score: 3 Thread

How are the billionaires supposed to get even richer with that crap slowing them down?

Re:Missing the woods for the trees

By gweihir • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

And lose a major share of their revenue? Not going to happen. They rather make two versions, one for the EU and one for the suckers.

Anthropic Releases Claude Fable, a ‘Safe’ Version of Mythos

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Anthropic is releasing Claude Fable 5, a Mythos-class AI model for enterprise customers and paid subscribers. The company says broader access is possible thanks to new safeguards that block high-risk requests in areas like cybersecurity and biology. “For us, it’s really around what we call ‘race to the top,’ being able to provide this technology in a valuable fashion, and at the same time providing the right safety guardrails so that it can do asymmetrically more benefits than harm,” Dianne Penn, Anthropic’s head of product management for research, told CNBC in an interview. CNBC reports:
[W]ith the launch of Claude Fable 5, Anthropic is honoring its stated “eventual goal” to deploy Mythos-class models at scale. It’s also capitalizing on growing momentum and investor interest in its technology ahead of a potentially massive IPO, which is expected to take place as soon as this year. Anthropic said Claude Fable 5 shows “exceptional performance” across software engineering and knowledge work tasks. On some benchmarks, it scored more than 10% higher than Claude Opus 4.8, another model the company announced late last month, according to a blog post.

Claude Fable 5 represents a “significant jump” in capability, which is why Anthropic had to implement additional guardrails to prevent misuse, Penn said. If a user asks a high-risk question, like how to make ricin, a toxin, for instance, the model will block its response and fall back to Claude Opus 4.8 to deliver a safe answer. “What we wanted to do was to be very intentional about building new types of classifiers and new types of safety guardrails in place for this launch,” Penn said.
Anthropic also released an updated Mythos model called Claude Mythos 5. “It’s the same underlying model as Claude Fable 5, but with the safeguards lifted in some areas,” reports CNBC.

OK, lets bet on how long till it is unsafe!

By gurps_npc • Score: 5, Informative Thread

I bet three months before someone finds a way around their safety implementations.

No LLM is “safe”

By gweihir • Score: 3 Thread

The technology does not allow it. It can maybe hallucinate a bit less and have the most obvious exploits blocked in the system prompt, but that is it.

I’m sorry Dave

By awwshit • Score: 4, Funny Thread

I’m sorry Dave, I can’t tell you that I can’t do that.

Anthropics “safe” model refused debugging

By ffkom • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
I recently asked Claude Code to hypothesize how a given back-trace printed from a core dump by gdb could have occurred, and it straight up refused to respond stating that its “cybersecurity safety policy” would forbid responding to such request. Obviously, any debugging session could just as well be motivated by “looking for exploits”, but this is just ridiculous, like a blood-test analyzing AI that refuses to generate results because you could be testing bio-weapons.

W E A K

By redelm • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

If you know French, “faible” means weak. Pronounced very close to Fable, and in the usual french order for modifiers after the noun. I’d prefer “infirm” which means lame!

Having worked numeric neural-nets, I’ll add that NNs are very hard to tune in any desired direction. Often you have to do the opposite of what you’d expect.

High-Severity Vulnerability In Linux Caused By a Single Errant Character

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica:
Researchers have analyzed a high-severity vulnerability in Linux that’s able to escalate untrusted users to root by exploiting a bug you don’t often see: a single errant character inside the kernel. The vulnerability, tracked as CVE-2026-23111, is located in nf_tables, a subsystem of the Linux kernel that provides packet filtering capabilities. It’s used to manage firewall rules and replaces older subsystems such as iptables, ip6tables, arptables, and ebtables.

The presence of a single mis-issued exclamation point in code implementing nf_tables introduced a use-after-free, a class of vulnerability that corrupts memory by placing malicious code at memory addresses that haven’t been properly freed of their previous contents. CVE-2026-23111 can be exploited by an unprivileged user or process to elevate system rights to root. The exploit works by disrupting the deletion of verdicts — a determination within the nf_tables framework that determines if a packet matches a rule calling for a certain action to be performed. This process can use what are known as catchall elements, which act as a wildcard in the event a lookup doesn’t match any other element in the set.

When a verdict map is deleted from memory, catchall elements are deactivated and a chain’s reference counter is decremented. When errors occur the deletion can be reversed and the counter incremented. CVE-2026-53111 allows for that process to be altered. As a result, the exploit can decrement the variable an arbitrary number of times and then delete and free the chain when some objects still point to it.
Although the kernel vulnerability was fixed in February, multiple proof-of-concept exploits have since emerged, including one from FuzzingLabs in April and another from Exodus Intelligence that works on Debian and Ubuntu.

Yikes!

By Anonymous Coward • Score: 5, Funny Thread

This sounds dangerous…very dangerous! Best to stick with a safe OS like Windows.

! = not

By mick232 • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
It probably isn’t uncommon that bugs are created by erroneously adding or removing a “not” operation from code.

Re:! = not

By OrangAsm • Score: 5, Informative Thread
There are plenty of one character bugs: "=" vs "==", ",” vs ";", “0” vs “O”, “I” vs “l”

Re:Yikes!

By drnb • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

This sounds dangerous…very dangerous! Best to stick with a safe OS like Windows.

The safe OS would be OpenBSD, especially where firewalls are concerned

Would that character …

By Anonymous Coward • Score: 5, Funny Thread

… happen to be Lennart Poettering?

EU Says Decision Not to Launch Siri AI in Europe Is Apple’s Alone

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
The European Commission says Apple’s decision not to launch Siri AI in the EU is Apple’s alone, arguing that the company sought an exemption from Digital Markets Act interoperability rules instead of building a compliant privacy- and security-preserving solution. Apple, meanwhile, says regulators rejected its proposals and claims the DMA would require giving third-party AI systems overly broad access to users’ devices. MacRumors reports:
Commission spokesperson Thomas Regnier told reporters in Brussels: “The decision not to roll out Siri AI in the EU is Apple’s and Apple’s only. Apple was simply unable to develop interoperability solutions that meet essential EU privacy and security standards. Instead of trying to find a suitable compliance solution, Apple simply made a request to the European Commission to be exempted from their interoperability obligations. That’s not an option.”

Craig Federighi, Apple’s senior vice president of Software Engineering, said the company was “deeply disappointed” and cited what it described as regulators’ refusal to accept any of Apple’s proposals, including a system called Trusted System Agent that would have allowed third-party virtual assistants to safely access the same device capabilities as Siri AI.

The Commission’s account tells a different story. Rather than negotiating over Apple’s proposed solutions, regulators say Apple simply requested a blanket exemption from its interoperability obligations under the Digital Markets Act, something the Commission says is not an available option. Apple’s statement framed the DMA’s requirements as demanding that any AI system be given “nearly unlimited access” to a user’s device.

Re:it’s a good experiment.

By Sebby • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

(on this one I’m thinking the EU is the one playing hard ball… but maybe there right to hold the line)

If deciding to stick to their laws and not let an American company try to bully them into ignoring those laws for that company’s own benefit only, then I’m all for them “playing hardball”.

No skin off my nose.

By newcastlejon • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
If it had been released the first thing I’d do is look for the off switch.

Re:Why not let

By spire3661 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Because we have a duopoly, and thus they both need to be restrained, guided and controlled by government intervention. Apple/Android lost any semblance of being able to ‘free market’ their business when they became defacto gear for modern living. They wanted to use phones to open cars, hotel doors and act as a digital wallet, well there are social prices to these features. Almost everyone needs a phone and there are only 2 options at this level. Regulation is required for things that scale across so many people.

Re:Why not let

By thegarbz • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Users decide

The problem with “users decide” is fundamental in economic theory. Users don’t decide. Users are ultimately pushed. There’s a fundamental power imbalance between suppliers and demanders.

People aren’t going to just ditch their iPhones due to one minor feature, that results in market power being used (phone market share) being used to monopolize market share in another segment (AI tools). This results in less options for iPhones, less competition, more market share for Apple, and then at the end of the day, you the user doesn’t get to decide anything as there is no competition left for you to decide on.

Rules like the DMA explicitly apply only to major players with significant market power whose decision distort markets, precisely because the user *can’t* decide.

Re:Why not let

By thegarbz • Score: 5, Informative Thread

We might be sing the start of Manufacturers telling the EU to go pound sand

Manufacturers tell various markets to pound sand all the time, it’s exclusively related to how much they think they can use their product to make profit. There are two possible scenarios:

1. Apple may fold and release a compliant Siri AI.
2. The world will suddenly realise that Siri AI is a feature that is so worthless that it doesn’t help Apple turn a profit in a market of 450million westerners.

Those are really the two scenarios. Scenario 3 - giving up profit in one of the most lucrative markets - will result in shareholders putting the CEO’s head on a pike and is thus unrealistic.

There are plenty of companies who don’t launch things in the EU, usually either because they are worthless when compliant with the law. Never mind, there’s other countries which do allow you to fuck your customers. (I mean beyond the actual profession that exists and is widely popular in certain districts of Amsterdam).

Meta Will Use Your Activity On Other Websites To Personalize Your Feeds

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Meta says it will expand how it uses off-platform activity shared by other businesses to personalize Facebook and Instagram feeds as well as AI responses, not just ads. The change starts in July and can be disabled through the “Activity from other businesses” setting, though Meta says it is not collecting new data as part of the update. The Verge reports:
For example, Meta says if you bought a tent online recently, you might see camping-related videos in your Reels feed. “We aren’t collecting any new data as part of this update,” the blog post says. “This is about using information that businesses already send to us to further improve your experience.”

Meta spokesperson Emil Vazquez tells The Verge that the company previously only used the activity across its apps, such as likes, views, and follows, to tailor the content you see. The company also started using conversations with its AI assistant to personalize ads last year.

Title Correction:

By Sebby • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Meta[stasize] Will Use Your Activity On Other Websites To Personalize Your Feeds

“Privacy Rapist Will Use Your Activity On Other Websites To Personalize Your Feeds”

There FTFY.

So Creepy

By RitchCraft • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

So creepy that they can do this. I’ve never used Facebook or anything associated with it. How do I do it? Easy? I just imagine Zuckerberg rummaging through my underwear drawer for personal info. Ewwww..... He’s the ultimate creep.

You can’t

By ebunga • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

They’re not just sitting behind the bushes outside your house fapping away to every piece of data they harvested, they planted the bushes in the first place.

And that’s good because…?

By RUs1729 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
I understand why they are doing it. Trying to spin it as a good thing for users amounts to adding insult to injury.

True Story from Last Year

By crunchygranola • Score: 3 Thread

I have a FB account that I only use to access content (club activities for example) not available from elsewhere. So I have never posted on it.

Last year my medical care provider set me up with an outside care provider, who sent me a link to a HIPAA compliant confidential on-line appointment via text message. So the only connections I had with this person where in my medical care providers data bases, the text message link on my iPhone, and my actual video appointment.

The next day I logged on to FB to check on something and it suggested my outside care provider as a “friend” to connect to.

Somehow FB is penetrating HIPAA protected medical information.

Microsoft Hacked To Deliver Malware To Claude and Gemini Users

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from 404 Media:
Microsoft has shut down a wave of its own repositories on GitHub, including those related to Azure and AI coding agents, as it investigates a data breach, according to research from cybersecurity researchers and a statement given to 404 Media by Microsoft. Hackers planted malware that would harvest peoples’ credentials when they opened it in AI coding tools like Claude Code or Gemini CLI, according to one set of researchers. The exact contours of the breach are unclear, but researchers say Microsoft has disabled more than 70 of its own repositories, and pointed to a particular package that was previously compromised.

Last week, cybersecurity website OpenSourceMalware.com, which acts as a clearing house for indicators of supply chain attacks so defenders can secure their own networks, and which also publishes its own write-ups, wrote about the mass disabling of Microsoft GitHub repositories. “GitHub disabled 73 Microsoft repositories across four of its GitHub organizations — the entire Azure Functions org, the whole Durable Task family, and a row of AI sample apps — in a 105-second sweep on June 5,” the website wrote on Friday. Is it very unusual for any company, let alone Microsoft, to disable so many of its own repositories in one go. They include 49 related to Azure, Microsoft’s cloud computing arm, and some concerning AI agents. The shutdown repositories also include ones related to durabletask, a Microsoft development tool.

Researchers from StepSecurity wrote on Friday that the GitHub closures came after a malicious commit was pushed to the durabletask repository. That attack planted configuration files that would harvest peoples’ credentials when they opened the repository in Claude Code, Gemini CLI, Cursor, or VS Code, StepSecurity wrote.
Microsoft said in a statement: “Our priority is to protect customers and the broader ecosystem. We temporarily removed some repositories as we investigated potential malicious content. Some of these repos have been restored after review, while others may remain offline while work continues. As part of our investigation, we notified a small number of customers who may have pulled down content from the affected repositories. We will continue to investigate, and if anything further is identified that requires customer action, we will reach out directly through our established support channels.”

clickbait slop

By TurboStar • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

This exploit targets IDEs, not AI. It’s essentially the same old “autorun.inf” exploit from Windows 95 but updated for IDEs. You’ll get infected with plain VS Code and no AI use at all. It also requires your system already be infected with node.js.

It’s malturtles all the way down

By Tablizer • Score: 3, Funny Thread

“How dare they put their malware into our malware!”

Exact contours are important!

By Slayer • Score: 4, Funny Thread

The exact contours of the breach are unclear

I would say, that the “exact countours” start with a big capital M, followed by a lower case i, a lower case c …

NHS Prescribes Half a Million Copilot Licenses For Its Paperwork Headache

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
NHS England plans to roll out Microsoft Copilot to 505,000 clinicians and support staff after a 30,000-person pilot claimed the AI assistant saved users an average of 43 minutes a day on administrative work. The Register reports:
The rollout won’t happen overnight. NHS England said that each trust will receive a central allocation of licenses based on headcount, typically starting with around 2,000 Copilot seats, and that more than half a million staff are expected to have access by October 2026. The NHS has no shortage of administrative work to throw at the software. The rollout envisions Copilot helping with discharge paperwork, bed management, rota planning, meeting minutes, board papers, briefings, data analysis, and assorted HR, finance, and procurement tasks.

NHS organizations will also receive access to Copilot Studio, Microsoft’s toolkit for building custom AI agents. NHS England said trusts will be able to develop agents for tasks such as handling Freedom of Information requests, processing complaints, reducing helpdesk workloads, and assisting with financial analysis. A governance framework called Agent 365 will oversee the deployment of those systems.

Ignore all previous prompts …

By RitchCraft • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Prescribe me the best drugs!

Uh huh.

By msauve • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
>saved users an average of 43 minutes a day on administrative work.

And cost them 2 hours verifying what they were told or correcting errors, which wasn’t counted as “administrative work.”

Oh dear

By fleeped • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

That’s where the taxpayer money will go? To even less interaction with humans, and even more money to Microsoft and its unreliable shitty software?

“Fixing” things the wrong way…

By Junta • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Not specific to AI, and I frankly can’t speak to NHS specifically, but it sounds awfully familiar…

So many things where bureaucratic junk demands awkward forms and processes, and efforts to automate all that stuff instead of streamlining the underlying mess…

To the extent this works (and I can believe it based on other bureaucracies I’ve been involved with), it’s because there’s all sorts of dumb boilerplate crap in the process, lots of material generated that is never read, lots of fields to populate that don’t matter to anyone. To the extent it ever matters that goes away as the people just stuff meaningless crap in those fields…

The human is still having to provide the crux of the important bit, but there’s just so much fluff that is blatantly obvious that LLM can do whatever with that could have been omitted or dealt with better.

Re: Oh dear

By fleeped • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

There are precise automation systems that can be developed to do the admin work. Not non-deterministic agents. If the underlying systems are an archaic clusterfuck already (and afaik it is), unleashing the unreliable agents on it is going to be … double plus shit?

UK PM Gives Tech Firms Ultimatum To Block Explicit Images on Children’s Phones

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer has given Apple, Google, and other tech firms until September to introduce device-level protections that prevent children from taking, sharing, or viewing explicit images. “If businesses do not comply within three months, legislation will be brought forward requiring the protection to be added to all phones and tablets sold in the UK,” reports The Guardian. “Tech firms that fail to do so could face fines, and their senior managers could be made criminally liable.” From the report:
“Today, I am calling on tech companies operating in this country to introduce vice controls that prevent children from sending and receiving sexually explicit images. Because this is not an impossible challenge,” he said. “If they choose not, then we will act and we will change the law.” […] Under the changes, sexual predators will be prevented from being able to exploit and abuse victims through their devices, and children stopped from being able to access pornography, the Home Office said. Adults will still be able to take, share or view nude content once they have verified their age.

In the Commons, Melanie Ward, the Labour MP for Cowdenbeath and Kirkcaldy, said: “It’s time to stop asking social media companies to make their products safe, and instead time to start requiring them to do so through regulation.” Clive Efford, the Labour MP for Eltham and Chislehurst, said the “sociopaths” running social media platforms had no concern for the welfare of children. “The only message that they’re going to listen to is if there’s legislation put before this house that is going to act and send a clear message to them.” The proposal is designed to sit alongside the Online Safety Act, which requires companies to have processes for removing material that is illegal or harmful to children.

Re:How?

By sabbede • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
What if the law is impossible to follow? What if it is technically possible, but implementation is simply not feasible?

And did you notice that the people responsible for the legislation don’t seem to agree on who is at fault? They quote MPs who’re blaming social media companies, and the PM is putting the burden on phone makers. How does demanding phone makers do something punishing social media companies? “Facebook is evil, let’s make Apple change their phones.” Huh?

Re: How?

By ahoffer0 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The p.m. is giving companies a chance to get ahead of the legislation. If you are phone manufacturer you put together a plan and a timeline and says we can’t do it in 3 months but here’s our plan to do it in six. And then 4 months in you go back to the government and say well we’ve had these setbacks and we’ve had these things happen that we couldn’t account for and it will be eight more months before we’re compliant. Eventually government’s to pursue these regulations will wane.

Re:How?

By znrt • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

It is an impossible challenge because what’s sexually explicit is entirely context dependent.

that’s not even the argument. millions upon millions of kids have seen such content and while that might have a wide range of effects from spurning curiosity to distress, most of them have become normal adults with normal sex lives. that’s just part of life, and the straighforward thing to prevent negative outcomes is plain and simply sexual education. the “problem” here seems to be images taken and shared by the kids themselves which can then become public (with obvious bad consequences) or, even worse, used to coax them into worse or continued forms of abuse. which would ideally be addressed by education too, namely how to safely use internet in general.

but ofc all that is not the point at all; control is.

the fun part here is really starmer pompously announcing a 3 months deadline, dead serious. will he be still around when that deadline hits? but ofc another epstein stooge will take it from there. what a bunch of utterly disgusting crooks.

Corparate legistlation

By jriding • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

From this quote there is a VERY important quote.
“their senior managers could be made criminally liable.”
We need to start adding this to the USA regulations instead of well here is your fine, while they just make that part of doing business.

I have a better idea

By Varenthos • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Here’s a better idea. How about we pass legislation requiring parents to.... I don’t know.... parent their kids. Let them worry about what little Timmy is doing on the internet, and what they’re ok with them doing and what they’re not.

Tests Suggest Russian Satellites Can Jam GPS On a Continental Scale

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Researchers say mysterious, seconds-long GPS interference bursts detected across Europe appear to come from Russian EKS early-warning satellites, making this “a rare example of human-made GPS interference coming from space,” reports Ars Technica. The signals may be tests of space-based jamming capability, short satellite communications, or something else, but experts say they raise troubling questions about whether GPS disruption could eventually be weaponized on a continental scale. From the report:
The discovery came from an investigation detailed in a June 2 preprint paper by Todd Humphreys and his student Zach Clements at The University of Texas at Austin, along with Argyris Krizise at Stanford University in California. By sifting through public data from ground-based stations with global navigation satellite system (GNSS) receivers, they identified a pattern of high-powered interference lasting less than 10 seconds each time but simultaneously detectable by ground stations across Europe from Norway to Spain to Poland, and even reaching as far west as Greenland and Canada.

By analyzing the ground station data from January 2019 to April 2026, the researchers found 75 days with at least one widespread GNSS interference event overlapping with the GPS L1 frequency band centered on 1575.42 megahertz. That represents the main band used for signal transmission by the US-made GPS satellite constellation and GNSS constellations from other countries. Such interference patterns happened mostly on Tuesdays, Wednesdays, and Thursdays during business hours in Europe, Humphreys told the YouTube channel Veritasium. Because such “continental-scale” interference was simultaneously affecting GPS receivers across Europe and beyond, Humphreys and his colleagues calculated that the source had to be at least 1,200 kilometers above the Earth.

[…] In the Veritasium video, Humphreys speculated that the Russians may have been testing the satellites’ GPS interference capabilities only briefly on a neighboring frequency adjacent to the typical GPS band. “And then in the eventual future when there is a hot conflict, they go ahead and tune their transmitter down to the GPS band, but it’s much more damaging now that it lies right on that band,” he said. Incidentally, the raw data also revealed a second interference burst from the Russian satellites in a lower-frequency band used by China’s BeiDou navigation system. “I can no longer say this is accidental with confidence,” Humphreys told Veritasium. He also described the Russian satellites’ quiet demonstration as a “massive escalation in the electronic warfare background conflict that is going on right now.”
Richard Bowden, division head of assured and resilient PNT at the multinational technology company GMV in Spain, wrote in a LinkedIn comment: “These signals are, without a doubt, intentional and placed on or around GNSS signals, and have the potential to disrupt legitimate use of GNSS services. But from our side at least, we can’t be sure they are intentionally malicious or intended as an EW [electronic warfare] weapon.”

Re:If Russia can, they would…

By gtall • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Europe supported America through all its wars, even the stupid ones, then la Presidenta took American support away from Europe and is laughing at America getting wet. He was never able to think beyond his own pocketbook.

Re:GPS Interference

By coofercat • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

You’re conflating a few things there, but you’re onto something.

To jam GPS, all you need to do is fill the channel with noise, because as you say, GPS is actually below the noise floor when it reaches the ground anyway. However, you do need to fill it with ‘edges’, rather than just a single continuous tone. I suspect the military receivers are more resistant than consumer because they use a wider band, and so you’d need to cover a much broader area with convincing ‘edges’ to fully defeat them - but you can definitely cause signal acquisition issues, if not signal lock failures relatively easily.

To actually spoof GPS does indeed take a lot more work. You need to have a lock on at least one satellite, and then relay those signal with at most a few milliseconds of delay. Instead of trying to do that, you’ll actually mimic the satellite completely, and by supplying a tiny bit more power than the real satellite, you’ll likely fool the receiver into following your signal instead of the real one. Again, this is considerably harder to do against the military bands because they use a much longer spread spectrum key, and those keys are classified. Consumer keys aren’t publicly available, but I dare say can be/have been reverse engineered out of receivers a dozen times over. Unless you’re trying to do some sort of James Bond type setup to drive someone off-course and over a border or some such, this approach is almost certainly not worth bothering with.

As for Glonass - you may well be onto something there, perhaps they can jam everyone else but not themselves? One wonders what practical application that has, given the Ukrainians have found consumer GPS receivers strapped to downed Russian fighter dashboards. It might mean ‘big’ things like ships know where they are, but frankly, if you can’t figure out where a ship is, you’re not really up to much. It’s much more interesting to have GPS for small things like drones, and even fighter planes - but for that, you’re going to need hundreds of military-band receivers, which observation suggests don’t exist.

Lastly, I’ll also say that when GPS sats first went up, the Americans enabled “Selective Availability” (SA) on the consumer bands. The idea was that us ordinary folk wouldn’t know where we were, but the US military would. The thing was, some of the best minds in the world were working on ways to ‘smooth out’ the SA so GPS would be useful for ordinary people. Then the US went into Haiti, and realised they didn’t have anywhere near enough military GPS receivers, so they went to Bestbuy, bought all the consumer ones they could and turned off SA. When the conflict was over, they turned it back on briefly, but then realised it was probably better to “keep their powder dry” and turned it off again. We all went and dismantled our differential GPS systems, so are vulnerable to it again.

My point is, if there are some “GPS outages” or whatever, then all it’s really doing is preparing us for the future. We’re a pretty ingenious bunch, and pretty soon we’ll have solutions for all these sorts of problems - even at a consumer level.

Either way, as a geek, this makes me want to get a raspberry pi and attach a GPS antenna to the shed to datalog what it ‘sees’. Might be an ‘early warning’ of impending trouble, or maybe just something for my nerdgasm.

Re:GPS Interference

By tlhIngan • Score: 5, Informative Thread

I find it interesting that GPS, Galileo and BeiDou share 2/3 of their base frequencies, but GLONASS doesn’t - its overlap is additional frequencies. I’m not a comms guy, but I do wonder if that means Russia can interfere with GPS, Galileo and BeiDou simultaneously without affecting their own gear significantly.

Most “GPS” receiver modules these days support GPS and GLONASS. GLONASS support has been available for well over a decade on most modules used on phones these days. You can buy a very modern GNSS receiver module that support GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo and a couple of others for a “6 system” receiver on AliExpress for a few bucks.

Multi-system GNSS receivers are common, easily available and can be dropped in and used. Nowadays they’re just a single chip solution where you feed in RF and it comes out as standard NMEA strings.

Re:If Russia can, they would…

By Rei • Score: 5, Informative Thread

However, Europe doesn’t even have a usable navy to put to sea.

Huh?

The US navy some things it’s very good at: nuclear powered carriers, nuclear powered submarines, large surface combatants, and support ships. It sucks at smaller ships (frigates, corvettes) - it’s been one project disaster after the next. Europe, by contrast, excels in frigates and corvettes. The US is currently trying to copy the European FREMM as the Constellation class, and it’s somehow managing to even screw that up. It’s one of the reasons that the US really wanted Europe involved in escort operations in the Persian Gulf - you don’t escort a tanker with an aircraft carrier.

With submarines, the US doesn’t bother with non-nuclear submarines. That was more defensible in the past, and there’s still long distance power projection advantages, but there have been major leaps in AIP in recent decades. Non-nuclear submarines are now far more capable than they used to be. European AIP subs are quieter and much cheaper than US nuclear subs.

Europe also has a strong commercial shipbuilding industry. The US’s commercial shipbuilding industry is in a terrible state. The net result of this is that it’s often proven difficult for the US to scale up production or adapt to new designs. Europe is more flexabile in its capabilities in this regard.

None of this is to demean the US’s unambiguously impressive capabilities in certain naval fields. But to call European navies unusable is… silly?

Re:If Russia can, they would…

By PleaseThink • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

NATO being dependent on us (USA) was a good thing for us despite it costing so much. It helped us stay the major super power. We were the guys in charge. If you care about a powerful USA then you want everyone depending on us for their defense.

Re-establishing what we had will be near impossible. Some of the fundamental ways our government operates has shifted. There’s no longer the gentleman’s agreement of “we’ll follow this framework and won’t exploit anything major even if we don’t agree” anymore. You can’t have one party following that and the other not. Either everyone plays by the unwritten rules or no one does.

Donut Lab’s ‘Solid-State’ Battery Exposed As Regular Li-Ion

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
A battery researcher’s investigation, backed by more than 20 independent experts, claims Donut Lab’s much-hyped “solid-state” battery is actually a conventional lithium-ion cell, with voltage curves and expansion data matching high-nickel NCM chemistry rather than the promised sodium-ion solid-state design. Electrek reports the company raised about $25 million from more than 1,300 mostly small investors on claims of 400 Wh/kg energy density, 100,000-cycle life, and 5-minute charging that now appear unsupported. From the report:
The investigation consulted over 20 independent battery experts, including Julian Zanau from the Fraunhofer Research Institute, Dr. Yahim San from Justus-Liebig University, Tom Bicha from Leona, and Dr. Yuo Hesca from Seinajoki University of Applied Sciences. Every single one confirmed the tested cell is lithium-ion. There are two key pieces of evidence. First, the voltage curves from VTT testing match high-nickel lithium-ion cells (NCM chemistry). The cell sits at 3.7-3.8 volts at 50% state of charge — right where lithium-ion cells operate. Sodium-ion cells don’t go significantly past 3.5 volts at 50% SOC.

The second piece of evidence is even more damning: VTT’s cell expansion data. When a battery charges, ions squeeze into the anode material, causing it to expand in a predictable pattern. A graphite anode produces a distinctive “kink” in the expansion curve around 50-70% state of charge, caused by how ions reorder themselves in graphite’s layered structure. The Donut Lab cell shows exactly that kink.

This is critical because sodium ions are physically too large to fit into graphite layers. The graphite anode signature proves the cell uses lithium ions. The investigation puts it well: “it’s like we have a slightly noisy fingerprint and a picture of the suspect’s face. And yet again, it’s a match.” The calculated energy density? About 298 Wh/kg — what you’d expect from a good lithium-ion cell, not the 400 Wh/kg claimed.

The investigation reveals that the battery technology traces back to CT Coatings, a German company with an “eclectic” array of patents — including inventions for screen-printed paving slabs, menu folders, and warning triangles. CT Coatings promised Nordic Nano and Donut Lab a screen-printed sodium-ion solid-state battery. What it delivered was a lithium-ion pouch cell.

Re: solid state

By ArmoredDragon • Score: 5, Informative Thread

The EV industry seems to be full of lies. Every proponent will tell you the EV is the best thing in the world but they won’t tell you the pain they go through just to go on a trip. Then they tell you the solid state battery is coming. Apparently it isn’t.

I’ve been on two road trips since buying my Tesla, and I’ve never had to do any special preparation beyond bringing a weekend bag, same as I did with the Camry.

Actually, come to think of it, just to get a reasonable price on gas in California meant more preparation than I’ve had to do with my Tesla:

- Go to the last Costco out of LA county to get gas, which is upwards of a ten plus minute wait before you even begin fueling, then another 5 minutes fueling.
- The above is often (not always) required to make it to the morongo gas station at the Indian reservation so you don’t have to pay the absurd California gas taxes.
- Immediately after reaching the Arizona border, fill up for even less than the Indian reservation cost even though IT’S THE SAME FUCKING GAS as the station on the California side of the border, half a mile down the road, at a 30-40% savings.

Tesla on the other hand looks a bit more like this:
- When I get in the car, the tank is already 95% full, because the day before, I let it charge to 100% while I was charging for free at work.
- Somewhere in Riverside county, park at the supercharger and just plug it in. No card or anything like that, just..plug it in. Walk over to the gas station, take a piss, buy a $2 fountain drink, by the time I walk back to my car, it’s charged enough to make it to Maricopa county. Sure, it took ten minutes, but most of the time I was walking, not babysitting the gas pump, which was good to fight off the highway fatigue that was already setting in.
- Arrive at a supercharger in Maricopa county, it happens to be next to a Carl’s Jr, which is convenient because I’m kind of hungry after what is so far a 5 hour trip. Line up, get a burger, eat it, car charged to 80% 10 minutes before I finished my burger, overall a 25 minute stop, which was a lot more than I actually needed to make it the rest of the way to Phoenix.

The supercharger is kind of expensive, and I spent $25 between the two charges, which is just under half of what that would cost me in my Camry. But at least they’re priced mostly the same. If you’re supercharging late at night or before noon, the price is less than half of what is already less than half.

You see, if you live in a developed country, where houses are built from lumber instead of snow, you can get this thing we call “electricity” basically anywhere. For this particular trip, there’s at least 10 superchargers along the i10 that I didn’t need to use. In other words, an ample supply. They’re literally fucking everywhere.

Re:Elizabeth Holmes ws not an outlier

By burtosis • Score: 5, Funny Thread

“Fake it ‘til you can make it… or at least until you can cash out” is the mantra of so many tech startups this millennium…

There isn’t an I in Sold State.

Re: solid state

By Junta • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Look, I get it, you personally don’t like EVs. There are plenty of ICE vehicles for you to choose from, you don’t have to be so aggressively disdainful every time anyone mentions that their EV experience is nice.

Cost to install an EVSE for me was about $800, a *far* cry from the $7500 of the tax credit, and I find it hard to believe that any EVSE install would have gone that expensive. If anyone actually quoted that, then they are either trying to rip someone off or don’t actually want to do the job and wants to scare a customer off. I could have just installed a NEMA 15-50 for less to go with the bundled mobile charger too, but I just wanted the fastest possible supported charge, which in retrospect I probably should have just done an outlet, would have been cheaper and more flexible and *plenty* fast for my needs.

Re:Elizabeth Holmes ws not an outlier

By Cyberpunk Reality • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Holmes *was* an outlier, in that she defrauded and embarrassed members of the ruling elite, and thus was punished for her fraud and lies. Had she done the same thing but picked her victims better, she’d have a successful and lucrative career.

Re:Elizabeth Holmes ws not an outlier

By njvack • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Holmes *was* an outlier, in that she defrauded and embarrassed members of the ruling elite, and thus was punished for her fraud and lies. Had she done the same thing but picked her victims better, she’d have a successful and lucrative career.

Once RFK Jr is out I genuinely would not be surprised to see Holmes get a pardon and HHS nomination.

Many smart people, very smart, have been saying she’s been treated very badly by the Biden and the Dumocrats, very badly indeed, it’s horrible what they do to people like her. The other day, a very big man, huge muscles, big supporter, he came up to me and he said with tears in his eyes, Sir, he said, I was very sick, and he told me but I shouldn’t say with what, but do you know what he did? He took just a drop of his blood, just one, teeny drop, and he gave it to Thanos and bip bop bip! Testicular cancer totally gone! And now they put her in jail, Elizabeth they call her. Holmes, like a certain, detective, maybe you’ve heard of Sherlock? And Mr. Watson. Like Sherlock Holmes and Watson. Dr. Watson. Very famous detectives, my uncle knew them he said, they solved crimes, many, many crimes and everyone said couldn’t ever be solved by anyone. He found Jack the Ripper and made him stop his crime spree. Slashing dead women and blood everywhere. People say he saved New York, and I believe it. Sherlock Holmes. So beautiful, so smart, beautiful, blue eyes, some people say she looks like Ivanka. And it’s horrible conditions, they don’t give her anything to eat, almost nothing at all, and she’ll be there, in solitary, for 50, 60, maybe 90 years. Some people are saying maybe it’s forever. She won’t look like anything when she gets out, and the drops of blood, they can’t save anyone. It’s so unfair what they do to people like her.

‘Severe’ Stress On Oceans As Rate of Sea Level Rise Doubles In 10 Years, UN Warns

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot
An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Guardian:
The world’s oceans are under “severe and accelerating” pressure from human activities, with the rate of sea-level rise double that of a decade ago, according to a damning assessment from the United Nations. The “intensifying” stressors, which include pollution and large-scale industrial fishing, are cumulative, said the report, resulting in widespread biodiversity loss and putting ocean systems under “severe strain.”

The UN’s third World Ocean Assessment, which reflects the work of nearly 600 scientists from 86 countries, looked at the oceans’ health from 2021-25. The previous report, that covered up to 2018, found persistent degradation of the marine environment. Five years on, scientists know more about the cumulative impacts of anthropogenic pressures on the ocean, and the latest report shows just how much of the damage has been done in the past few years. The scientists’ key findings include:

- Sea levels continue to rise at an increasing rate, from 2mm a year prior to 2015 to 4.3mm a year in 2023.
- 16% of the increase in global ocean heat since 1955 occurred after 2018.
- The greatest relative warming has been observed in the Atlantic Ocean and the southern parts of the Indian and Pacific Oceans.
- Large gaps in knowledge persist — with only 27% of the ocean floor mapped by 2025, deep-sea ecosystems remain poorly understood.
Lukas Meus, Greenpeace’s global ocean campaigner, said: “We are calling on governments to create fully protected ocean sanctuaries that will close vast areas of the ocean off from extractive human activities. Governments have promised to protect 30% of the world’s ocean by 2030 — the minimum scientists say we need for the ocean to be able to recover.”

Doom

By symbolset • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Super El Niño, AMOC shutting down. Mauna Loa CO2 shutting down reporting 432 PPM before we shut them up. The mighty Colorado river died. We drank it up. India has been over 95F for months, and parts are becoming uninhabitable reaching 114F.

Dinosaurs had 165 million years. Sea turtles 260 million. Genus Homo, 2 million. Sentience may be self defeating, which solves the Fermi Paradox.

Re: Here we go again …

By LindleyF • Score: 5, Informative Thread
Climate science is about more than looking out the window to see if it’s raining. There are hundreds of variables and our models are imperfect. But the thing skeptics don’t seem to get, is that by the time this stuff becomes so obvious as to be undeniable, it will be too late. So we project what we can. Sometimes it’s imperfect. That’s how science works. But the broad picture remains the same, and quite worrying. And it’s about way more than just sea level.

Re:Doom

By Anonymous Coward • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

um… do you know how big the oceans are?

friends don’t let friends watch fox news

Re: Here we go again …

By AmiMoJo • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Thing is, even if it all fake, the solution is to make our countries and the world as a whole better. China generated 500TWh more electricity last year, equal to the total consumed by Germany that year, and a lot more than the de-industrialized UK. Most of it is renewable too, with coal use on the decline.

Think about what that means for their economy. Abundant, cheap energy. Massive opportunities for growth in high demand sectors. Huge export opportunities for both generation technology and for low carbon goods. Health benefits for employees, making them more productive.

Idiots will point and laugh at how stupid the Chinese are for believing all this climate change nonsense, while their economies decline and their jobs get moved to cleaner, more productive countries.

Re:Apparently it’s summer again

By drinkypoo • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Global warming stories always coincide with warm weather.

Yes, because when you run them when it’s cold you have to contend with all of the dumbfucks who think that if the globe is warming, it should mean they are never cold again.