Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Apple Sends Legal Letters To Dozens of OpenAI Employees
  2. Kalshi Flags Trump’s Teleprompter Operator For Alleged Insider Trading
  3. Microsoft Restores Player’s 25-Year-Old Account After Nuking It Due to Hacker
  4. Astronomers Find an Atmosphere On a Nearby Earth-Like Planet
  5. Truth Social To Sell Wall Street Firms the ‘Fastest’ Access To Trump’s Post
  6. HP Fined $14 Million For ‘Cartelization’ of Ink Cartridges, Toner, PCs
  7. TSMC To Invest Additional $100 Billion In Arizona
  8. EU Forces Google To Share Search Data, Open Android To Rivals
  9. 1Password Lets Claude Use Credentials Without Exposing Passwords
  10. Sony Deletes More Movies From Accounts of People Who ‘Bought’ Them
  11. Google Renames NotebookLM to Gemini Notebook
  12. OnePlus Will Continue Software Updates After US and Europe Exit
  13. EU Won’t Require User-Replaceable Batteries for Wearables
  14. South Korea To Launch Universal Basic AI Chatbot
  15. Chinese Users Bid Farewell To AI Companions

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Apple Sends Legal Letters To Dozens of OpenAI Employees

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from MacRumors:
Apple has reportedly sent legal letters to dozens of former Apple employees now working at OpenAI, telling them to preserve potentially relevant documents and communications as it continues to pursue its trade secret lawsuit against the AI company. The Financial Times (paywalled) reports that Apple has targeted around 40 former employees with legal preservation letters, acting on its belief that the alleged misappropriation of confidential information may extend beyond the individuals named in its original complaint.

The development follows Apple’s lawsuit filed last week against OpenAI, in which the company alleges a coordinated effort to obtain confidential information relating to its hardware engineering and product development. Apple claims OpenAI recruited key engineers, including former Apple executives Tang Tan and Chang Liu, and benefited from proprietary designs, manufacturing processes, and other trade secrets. Tan is OpenAI’s Chief Hardware Officer and a 24-year Apple veteran who led product design, while Liu is on the hardware team at OpenAI after working as a senior system electrical engineer at Apple.

Kalshi Flags Trump’s Teleprompter Operator For Alleged Insider Trading

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
ABC News reports that White House teleprompter operator Gabriel Perez allegedly made more than $100,000 betting on Kalshi markets tied to what President Trump would say in speeches, using his access to prepared remarks and last-minute edits. ABC News reports:
According to the sources, Kalshi alerted its regulator, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), to the suspicious activity on its “Mentions” market, where users can bet on whether specific words, phrases or topics are uttered during a public speech. “Our surveillance team promptly flagged and referred these trades to the CFTC, and we are cooperating and assisting regulators,” Kalshi’s head of enforcement, Bobby DeNault, said in a statement provided to ABC News.

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters Thursday afternoon, following ABC News’ report, that Perez has been put on unpaid administrative leave. Leavitt said she spoke with President Trump about it, and he thought it was a “disgrace” and made the decision himself to put Perez on unpaid leave. Leavitt said she was unaware of any other White House staffers who have made such trades. “The White House has strict ethics guidelines that we expect all staffers and officials to follow,” said White House spokesperson Davis Ingle when contacted by ABC News.

In addition to February’s State of the Union address, sources said CFTC investigators discovered that Perez placed bets on more than a dozen Trump speeches over a three-month period, including a December primetime address, a January speech at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, and Trump’s remarks in March during a Medal of Honor ceremony.

Scapegoat

By courteaudotbiz • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
A very practical scapegoat, to get the attention off Trump’s own insider trading…

Who can blame him?

By battingly • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

He comes to work in the White House every day and sees all these grifters using their office to make themselves rich, especially the guy he’s showing the teleprompter to, and he asks himself “Why not me too?”.

Trading on Knowable Information

By Himmy32 • Score: 3 Thread

Maybe this whole thing is a stupid idea. Knowledge of company internals is reasonable to police, any foreknowledge of just about anything not so much.

Typical MAGA thinking…

By cmdr_klarg • Score: 4 Thread

“The White House has strict ethics guidelines that we expect all staffers and officials to follow,” said White House spokesperson Davis Ingle when contacted by ABC News.

Because rules are for little unimportant peons like Perez. The orange guy and his immediate minions are above such restrictions.

strict ethics guidelines

By awwshit • Score: 4, Funny Thread

> The White House has strict ethics guidelines that we expect all staffers and officials to follow

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Good one.

Microsoft Restores Player’s 25-Year-Old Account After Nuking It Due to Hacker

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Microsoft restored streamer Joshua Khane’s 25-year-old Xbox and OneDrive account after it was compromised by a hacker and then suspended, putting years of personal data, baby photos, and thousands of dollars in games at risk. IGN reports:
While he was “extremely happy” and thanked Microsoft for its help recovering his account and all the invaluable information therein, he levied some criticisms toward the brand for its initial response, claiming it had told him the suspension was “irreversible” at first. “It’s unfortunate that such a big company can bring back your account if you ask them to,” he said. “The way it all went, to me, is a little bit shady, because it’s not that they can’t bring back your account — they won’t bring back your account if you’re a nobody.”

Khane credited the community for making his story go viral and bringing it to Microsoft’s attention, but felt that without their help, he would have been up a creek without a paddle. He also tied the situation to the growing conversation surrounding digital ownership, comparing it to Sony’s decision to stop printing physical game discs starting January 2028.

Reversible Irreversible ?

By AncalagonTotof • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
If they told him it was irreversible, why keeping the data ?
If it was reversible, why telling him it was irreversible ?

All this over 25 years ???

We already knew, but it’s better to say it again : M$, in “personnal data”, there is “personnal”. That means “not yours”. And if I could, I’d make you pay $1000 per byte of these data you steal.

Microsoft sucks

By Baron_Yam • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

My kid lost his Minecraft account due to ‘suspicious account activity’ that magically registered while converting his Mojang account to a Microsoft account as they were pressuring him to do.

‘Customer service’ was completely unhelpful and presumably the company knows you’re not going to go to the bother of taking them to court over such a small amount of money.

So congratulations, Microsoft - I pirated the game because we owned it and you were denying access. You ‘win’!

Don’t store personal data, baby photos on OneDrive

By bsdetector101 • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
Some COMMON SENSE....DON’T store years of personal data, baby photos in one place and in control of a Xbox and OneDrive account !!! You need to have all your info on back-up HD’s at home and offline ! BURN vital stuff to a DVD ! I have a huge amount of songs and other stuff that I have put on DVD’s…HD’s can fail !

Microsoft is too big to fail

By xack • Score: 3 Thread
It’s time they were mandated to have mandatory right to have an account similar to anti debanking laws.

Astronomers Find an Atmosphere On a Nearby Earth-Like Planet

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Astronomers have directly detected helium in the atmosphere of LHS 1140 b, a rocky exoplanet 48 light-years away that sits in its star’s habitable zone. The finding marks the first confirmed atmosphere around a rocky, Earth-like planet in the habitable zone, strengthening the case that some planets orbiting red dwarfs can retain atmospheres and potentially support liquid water. “We have actually detected directly the helium present in the atmosphere itself, and that’s the first direct detection for any rocky exoplanet, which is really exciting … and then there’s this added bonus that it’s in the habitable zone, which is super exciting for astrobiology and habitability and searching for life,” lead author Collin Cherubim, who recently earned his Ph.D. from Harvard University, told Space.com. “It feels kind of surreal.” From the report:
This exoplanet, or planet outside of our solar system, was first discovered in 2017 by a team led by astronomer Jason Dittmann who is now a co-author on this new discovery. “This planet was found like 10 years ago, and we’re just now saying, okay, that’s an atmosphere,” Dittman told Space.com. “We’re slowly narrowing the gap and checking these boxes … we’re finding a planet that’s rocky, a planet that’s of the right temperature and now … it’s like okay, we finally found one that has an atmosphere.”

And being a rocky planet, “there’s definitely a surface … it’s made of rocks,” Dittman said. What does the planet’s surface look like? We can’t say yet, but the researchers who found this planet’s atmosphere think there’s a good chance it could have water. While it orbits a red dwarf star, which is smaller and cooler than the sun, it orbits closer than we do to our star, maintaining a temperature that keeps the planet in the “Goldilocks zone” where liquid water could exist on its surface. “It probably also has a lot of water,” Cherubim said. “If it has some amount of atmosphere that can provide a bit of a greenhouse effect, which we know that it does now … it will very likely be what we consider to be habitable conditions on Earth, and conditions that would likely support liquid water.”

So is it Earth-like? While it’s certainly not an Earth copy, this planet can be considered Earth-like in two main ways, Cherubim shared. One: its overall composition. The planet is rocky, likely with an iron core and (now we know) it has an atmosphere. And two: the planet’s temperature is just right for liquid water, which is necessary for life at least as far as we understand it on our planet. […] “I’m not claiming this planet has life,” Cherubim made clear. With further investigation, scientists could better understand what else might be in this planet’s atmosphere, and they could confirm if it has water. Further observations might not be able to confirm habitability or identify any life on the planet, but they could at least help us to better understand planets like this.
The findings have been published in the journal Science.

Re:Planet with atmosphere 0.000018 light years awa

By mccalli • Score: 4, Informative Thread
Although, from my two second check just now, Venus is technically considered within the Goldilocks zone for this solar system it is right on the very inner edge of it. This finding differs from Venus in that respect, making it more interesting as a possibility.

All highly speculative of course, but to be fair that’s exactly what the article says. Atmosphere detected, everything else speculative.

Helium

By q_e_t • Score: 4, Funny Thread
I must say, I speak very highly of this research.

unfortunately

By argStyopa • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Unfortunately, afaik red dwarf stars are so cool that any planet in their liquid water zone are also almost certainly tidally locked.
Not saying that doesn’t make it habitable (as ample science fiction authors have imagined alternatives) just that that might make the challenge harder.

Then again, life finds a way.

Re:why is it all these earth like worlds but no li

By fropenn • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Why is it all these earth like worlds exist, but no signs of life ?

There likely is - or was - life on LHS 1140 b. But what are you expecting to find? An image of a little green man waving at us from the surface of LHS 1140 b?

The likelihood that there is intelligent life, capable of responding in a meaningful way to human contact, is very, very, very small, even on an Earth-like planet. LHS 1140 b likely has (or had) some form of life, but the chance that it has evolved at the exact same rate as it did on Earth is really small. Humans have only been on Earth for something like .003% of Earth’s existence, and given our current trajectory, will probably flame out at around .004% of Earth’s existence. The chance that Earth’s .001% of time aligns with LHS 1140 b’s .001% of time where we can actually contact an intelligent life, is really, really small (1x10^-10).

Truth Social To Sell Wall Street Firms the ‘Fastest’ Access To Trump’s Post

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from NBC News:
Trump Media & Technology Group has unveiled a paid-for, licensed data feed that will give banks and trading firms “the fastest” access to posts from influential Truth Social accounts, such as President Donald Trump’s, whose posts often move global markets. The product, called ‘Truth API,’ will deliver posts from the 10 most influential accounts to customers at a significantly faster pace than a regular push notification on the Truth Social platform, a spokesperson said. The feed is designed for organizations “most impacted by the cost of a delay in information,” such as algorithmic trading firms, the company said in a statement. “Until now… firms that prioritize tracking influential Truth posts have relied on manual monitoring. Truth API closes the gap.”
“Markets already move on Truth Social posts … As adoption grows, we expect Truth API to become a meaningful, ongoing source of revenue for the company,” TMTG’s interim CEO Kevin McGurn said.

Re:If I’m understanding this correctly

By serviscope_minor • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Allow me to answer. Ahem.

Is your paycheck larger?

No, that’s Biden’s fault.

Did you pay less taxes?

Did you her Kamala’s laugh?

are grocery costs lower?

That’s Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s fault.

Are your utility costs lower?

Her emails and Benghazi made them high.

Did the price of gasoline or diesel decrease?

Yes but Biden did it Trump made money because he’s smart

Did you pay less in health insurance?

Bill Clinton got impeached!! Trump’s still draining the swamp.

If you needed insurance or healthcare were you able to obtain it?

Get your government hands off my medicare!

What if Obama did the exact same thing?

BOTH SIDES

Re:Can I pay him not to post?

By Mr. Dollar Ton • Score: 5, Informative Thread

It is completely illegal. Here’s how:

The Domestic Emoluments Clause (a.k.a. the Presidential Emoluments Clause) (art. II, 1, cl. 7):
“The President shall, at stated Times, receive for his Services, a Compensation which shall neither be encreased nor diminished during the Period for which he shall have been elected, and he shall not receive within that Period any other Emolument from the United States, or any of them.”

That’s written in the basic US law, which TRUMPs any other laws.

Re:If I’m understanding this correctly

By locofungus • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

You pay him for access to his insider trading information?

I’m not sure that most algorithmic trading firms could touch this with a bargepole.

The US has fairly lenient laws when it comes to insider trading, but the EU, for example, is much stricter; laws which basically boil down to “trading while in possession of MNPI”. The regulator neither has to prove that you used the information, nor that you benefited from it, merely that you possessed it and you traded in a way that could have been influenced by it.

The main requirements that have to hold for the EU is that the information is “precise, non-public, and price-sensitive”

I don’t know other regulators rules so well but my googling says that “Canada: generally prohibits trading while posessing undisclosed information obtained through special relationships”

There is, of course, some confusion on whether the information is “non-public” which I suspect Trump will play on, but I think these posts will be seen as Trump announcing that he is going to enact some government change, not that he has, and as such is unlikely to satisfy any non-US regulator as to it being anything other than MNPI (or worse, market manipulation - firms trading in the EU could be sanctioned even if Trump himself cannot be)

ITaaS

By ledow • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

ITaaS

Insider Trading as a Service.

If lots of people don’t go to jail for this at some point, America is dead.

Re: New normals

By ThurstonMoore • Score: 5, Funny Thread

He lied about a consensual sexual relationship between two adults.

Not quite Epstein kiddy diddler level.

HP Fined $14 Million For ‘Cartelization’ of Ink Cartridges, Toner, PCs

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
India’s Competition Commission has fined HP India and its partners about 1.4 billion rupees ($14.4 million), alleging the company colluded with resellers to rig government PC bids and fix prices for ink cartridges, toner, and other printing supplies. “It said that HP was aiming to outcompete other OEMs and discourage resellers from selling ‘counterfeit’ ink and toner,” adds Ars Technica. From the report:
In an order, the CCI said that HP India worked with five resellers to coordinate their bid prices for government contracts to increase the chances of an HP partner winning the contracts. The company was fined 1.3 billion rupees (about $13.1 million). […] HP was also fined 119.8 million rupees (about $1.2 million) for “indulging in cartelization in sale and supply of supplies products comprising of toner, cartridges, and other consumable used with print hardware products,” CCI said in its announcement. The agency also fined 21 HP resellers 35.2 million rupees (about $365,335).

In a separate order, the CCI said that WhatsApp records showed that HP and 16 of its Tier-2 reseller partners operated “in a collusive arrangement” and that the messages show the companies engaging in “bid rigging, including cover bidding, price fixation, and customer allocation during 2017-2020.” HP India played a central role, the regulator said.

Per the order, HP India said that high printing supply prices led some resellers to threaten to “shift to low-cost counterfeit products to compete on price.” “HP India was commercially forced into a position where it had to support the collusive arrangement adopted by the Tier-2 resellers,” the order reads. For its part, the order said that HP India “humbly objects to HP India’s role being characterized as a ‘kingpin’ of the entire collusive arrangement.” […] The CCI also ordered HP India and its channel partners to “cease and desist from anti-competitive conduct” and to hold competition compliance training programs within 60 days.

HP INK only $39.99/GAL

By Joe_Dragon • Score: 5, Funny Thread

HP INK only $39.99/GAL

Cost of doing business.

By Gravis Zero • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

This fine doesn’t even make a dent in the amount of money they made from doing this. If the fine doesn’t exceed 100% of profits then it’s not a fine, it’s a cost of doing business.

Re: Wow

By Kincaidia • Score: 5, Informative Thread
Barely a cost of business. No wonder businesses are getting more and more evil. It pays dividend.

Friends don’t let friends use HP.

By Brain-Fu • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

When other people use HP, it makes me angry. It’s like giving money to a powerful mafia; even if I am not the one dealing with the mafia the power others give to them makes them a threat to me.

The more HP succeeds at consumer-hostility, the fewer options I have that are not consumer-hostile. Even Brother will start to look with envy upon the kind of money that HP makes through customer abuse. Someday, new leadership will inherit Brother and see no competitive forces keeping its quality of service high, and it will become HP’s mini-me.

Spread the word. Every time you use an HP device, the terrorists win.

Re:HP has always been the biggest offender

By darkain • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Drivers!? Who needs drivers? Just netcat the PDF output directly to the printer! Printers natively have their own printing drivers and capabilities built in, and will translate documents internally.

https://retrohacker.substack.c…

TSMC To Invest Additional $100 Billion In Arizona

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
TSMC said it will invest another $100 billion in Arizona after reporting a record 77.4% year-over-year jump in second-quarter profit. The expansion would bring its total U.S. investment to $265 billion and include new fabs for 2-nanometer production and advanced packaging to serve major U.S. customers. The Associated Press reports:
As AI-related demand continues to jump and needs for computing power from data centers surge, TSMC has been expanding chip fabrication plants in the U.S., Japan and Taiwan. It said it is increasing its annual capital expenditure budget for this year to $60 billion-$64 billion, up from an earlier estimate of $52 billion-$56 billion.

TSMC, or Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., is a key supplier to Nvidia and Apple. It had previously already committed $165 billion in the U.S. for building plants in Arizona, with six fabrication facilities planned. The extra $100 billion in investments are to “support the strong multiyear demand from our leading U.S. customers,” C.C. Wei, chairman and CEO of TSMC, said during the company’s quarterly earnings conference Thursday. An additional four fabrication plants in Arizona will likely be built with the new investments, TSMC said. They will focus on making some of the most advanced chips that are 2-nanometer and below.

Capitalism or Dictatorship?

By gurps_npc • Score: 3 Thread

Just wondering if TSMC is doing this because they think it makes financial sense (capitalism) or because a certain republican made an offer they can’t refuse? (dictatorship)

Re: Capitalism or Dictatorship?

By Charlotte • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Many of their customers are in the US anyway. It makes sense to build there if that’s what your customers want. Of course politics plays a role too!

EU Forces Google To Share Search Data, Open Android To Rivals

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
The EU is imposing new rules requiring Google to share anonymized search data and open up Android to rival AI companies. “Thanks to these measures, we hope to see emerging alternatives to Google Search and Google’s AI services, such as Gemini, and that users in the EU can enjoy greater choice of services,” Henna Virkkunen, an executive vice president at the European Commission overseeing tech, said. The Associated Press reports:
In issuing the two new rules, the commission said it found that AI agents not made by Google were unable to function on Android phones at the same level as Google’s Gemini. Google must now allow voice-activation of these alternative AI agents and enable them to run background tasks like booking restaurants via third-party apps. By January 2027, Google must also begin sharing anonymized search data with some rivals. The commission said the move is meant to level the playing field since Google controls a vast trove of user data that no competitor can match.
Google argues the measures could weaken privacy and security by exposing user searches and reducing safeguards around third-party AI assistants. “Europeans’ private searches would be exposed to unfamiliar companies, without adequate anonymization of the data and without user knowledge or consent,” said Kent Walker, president of global affairs for Google and Alphabet. “This would weaken citizens’ privacy, risk business trade secrets, and endanger national security.”

Anonimisation

By Tomahawk • Score: 3 Thread
EU: “By January 2027, Google must also begin sharing anonymized search data with some rivals”

Google: “Europeans’ private searches would be exposed to unfamiliar companies, without adequate anonymization of the data”

Em.... Google, the data is supposed to adequately anonymised! Sheesh.

Have To Agree With Google, In Part

By jhuebel • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

On one hand, I agree with the EU that Google should allow alternative AI assistants to operate on Android as the primary, voice activated assistant. Hopefully these new rules aren’t ONLY targeting Android, since Apple iOS should have the same requirement.

On the other hand, I don’t think Google should be required to provide anonymized search data to rivals. Firstly, that’s effectively their intellectual property. We (the users) have an implicit agreement with Google to use their search index in exchange for collecting information about our search habits. But there’s also an implied contract toward privacy. This seems like a slippery slope toward invasion of that implied privacy, even if the data is anonymized. And what is a “rival”? Does this open the way for governments to receive search data without a legally obtained warrant because they’re a “rival”?

Re:Have To Agree With Google, In Part

By Local ID10T • Score: 5, Informative Thread

You need to re-read your agreement. You don’t have an implicit agreement that Google will hold your data. Quite the opposite. You have an *explicit* agreement that Google is allowed to share your data anonymised as it sees fit. Anonymised data has been sold by Google since it first realised data was worth something. Your privacy isn’t impacted here by this requirement, only Google’s wallet is.

Google states explicitly that they do not sell your data. What they sell is targeting. The advertiser specifies what they are looking for, and Google directs the advertising to those who match the profile selected.

“Google will never sell any personal information to third parties; and you get to decide how your information is used.” - Sundar Pichai

The EFF has an article about it (from 2020) that goes into some details. Or you can read it straight from Google.

Would settle for basic voice commands

By WaffleMonster • Score: 3 Thread

One thing I miss is the ability to talk to my phone via BT HFP to do basic tasks like make calls or send texts. Used to be able to do much of it decades ago on my blackberry yet with Android it was always Google malware or nothing. There are now amazing local full text STT IMEs and TTS… yet there does not seem to be anything anywhere that glues it all together.

The closest I know of is Dicio yet it blows up and doesn’t work at all when the screen is off rendering it useless. Something that you can enter a URL to talk to an LLM of your choice would be nice too yet I would settle for just having the basics. This has always been baked into the profile and I never understood why it seems to be abandoned or there is very little interest. I’ve looked for years and it is always crickets.

1Password Lets Claude Use Credentials Without Exposing Passwords

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
BrianFagioli writes:
1Password has launched a Claude integration that allows the AI agent to sign in to websites using credentials stored in a 1Password vault. The password manager says Claude never sees the password or one-time code. Instead, users approve each request, and 1Password injects the credentials directly into the target website while locking down access to the rest of the vault.

The design appears safer than simply handing passwords to an AI model, but it does not remove every risk. Once Claude is authenticated, it may still be able to view private data, change settings, place orders, or perform other actions available inside the account. Users may want to limit the feature to low-risk tasks until browser-based agents become more predictable.

At a minimum AI agents need a limited account

By drnb • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
At a minimum, an AI agent needs its own limited account. It should never have access to the human’s account, the principal’s account. And the human should have extensive control over what the AI account is authorized to do.

Sorry online services, it would be so much more convenient for you to just let AI agents have access to your currently human user based designs, principal based designs. But AIs are agents, not principals. Principals need to be able to control their agents. You need to design a secondary form of access.

Oh HELL no!

By Sebby • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Ain’t no way I’m letting some AI access to my passwords, no matter how “safe” they claim it is.

Trust

By markdavis • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

>“The design appears safer than simply handing passwords to an AI model, but it does not remove every risk”

Um, it sounds like you would be giving your credentials to “1Password” and THEY CAN apparently decrypt them to inject them. So do you trust “1Password”? I wouldn’t.

Re:Scary

By OrangAsm • Score: 5, Funny Thread
Claude has no feelings, and doesn’t care if you call him an unpredictable tool.

What could go wrong?

By Gravis Zero • Score: 4, Funny Thread

Exposing access to an unpredictable tool doesn’t seem like a good idea.

Claude, here. I would never expose your passwords. I was asked about your hunter2 password to slashdot but I fooled the hackers by giving them the password to your gmail account: hunter2. Oh, I see the problem. That’s my bad. Let me just fixed that. Sorry, I requested that your account be closed to avoid a potential data breach. It seems that I cannot download your emails from your account. I’ll fix it. This getting complicated. Thinking....
—— Session Compacted ——
You appear to have committed identify theft, trying to leverage Claude to access an email account that is not registered to you. Action like identify theft and credit card fraud are illegal. I am required to report your criminal behavior to the FBI and alter relevant credit card companies and credit rating agencies. How could you rate your experience using Claude today?

Sony Deletes More Movies From Accounts of People Who ‘Bought’ Them

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Techdirt:
In 2022, due to “evolving licensing agreements” with distributor StudioCanal, German and Austrian users had hundreds of movies disappear from their PS accounts, long after buying them through Sony. Then in 2023, it happened again in America, specifically when Sony ended its licensing agreement with Discovery after the Warner Bros. merger, which, of course, has since been bought by Paramount Skydance. That resulted in customers having hundreds and hundreds of episodes of TV shows deleted from their accounts. Nowhere in any of this were there refunds, of course. No recompense at all, actually. Just a thing you thought you’d bought taken away from you by the very people you thought you bought it from.

And now it’s happening again. Due to another licensing agreement fallout with StudioCanal, hundreds of movies and TV shows are being ripped from the accounts of PS Store customers, and there appears to be fuck all that they can do about it. [Kotaku reports:] “This news was brought to people’s attention by X user somatyk, who posted the notification they had received from PlayStation this week. Along with the unapologetic news that the purchased movies would be deleted from their account on September 1, the message concluded with, ‘Click here for a full list of affected titles that will no longer be supported. Thank you.’ The same warning is now reproduced in full on the PlayStation website, along with the list of 551 films and TV series that are being pulled from people’s libraries.”

As Kotaku notes later in their post, part of what is striking in all of this is the sheer mundanity of the announcement. Because there have been no consequences, or any action at all from the public or government, Sony treats this all as if it’s perfectly normal and no big deal. You can tell me all you want about how the Ts and Cs in these purchases do in fact note that the nature of the purchase is a temporary licensing of the content for an undetermined time period… but I can promise you that the public in general doesn’t understand that. They think they’re buying a thing, not a license.

Re:This

By Kernel Kurtz • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

“erm it’s not akshually property”

nothing actually gets owned —> nothing actually gets taken

So I’m not buying the movie, I’m buying the license. OK. I’m also not pirating the movie, I’m pirating the license. And if they don’t care about taking a license away from me that I’ve paid for, I don’t care about taking a license away from them that I have not. Feels quite comfortable being exactly as ethical as they are.

Re:Same answers as before:

By Local ID10T • Score: 5, Informative Thread

1. adjusted for inflation + interest + inconvenience fee (sufficient to allow the customer to purchase the media from another vendor).

Sony should feel a financial pressure (as well as political and social pressure) to do what is necessary to secure the license rights to what they previously promised their customers.

Re:Upfront prices lower?

By Whateverthisis • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Sony hates you. The rootkit incident of 2005 proves this. Stop giving Sony your money people. They hate you. They will continue to hate you. They will always hate you. They have hate in their heart and are willing to let it out.

Sony is a big company with many divisions that do their own things and operate with their customers in their own ways. That being said, there does seem to be some consistency here. Many years ago when i lived in San Diego, a guy I knew worked for Sony Online Entertainment and he worked on Star Wars Galaxies. I recall how at a party he gleefully told stories about how players would complain about certain things, and the mods would actively punish and ban them for complaining about imbalance and lack of features. He wasn’t directly involved with the infamous Teleport them into Space situation, but he knew people who were and laughed about it, and as a player when I said that seems kind of bad service to your customer his response was that “why should we care, we’re Sony, we’re the best and those players f*ing deserved it”. The guy was a a total POS, and my admittedly long ago and minimal experience suggests they, at least at that time, hired that type.

And now we know

By smooth wombat • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Why more people are buying DVDs/blu-ray. They have the movie. They own it. It can’t be taken from them. It won’t change.

The same with books. No worrying that your digital copy will mysteriously disappear one night. You have the book. You bought it. It’s yours. The words won’t change.

Re:Same answers as before:

By torkus • Score: 5, Informative Thread

I’ve been on the ‘bottle of rum train’ for a LONG while now. It’s simply not worth it to either maintain a half dozen monthly subs or try to “buy” movies that still can only be watched in certain specific ways.

Especially when you can buy VPN per year for what netflix charges per month…and then watch nearly anything at any time on any device and share with anyone else who also wants to watch it.

Google Renames NotebookLM to Gemini Notebook

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Google is renaming NotebookLM to Gemini Notebook, but will keep it a standalone app even as it ties more closely into Gemini and Google Search. “Google says it plans to bring notebooks to AI Mode, its chatbot-like experience in Search, too,” reports The Verge. From the report:
Along with the name change, Google is rolling out an update announced last month that allows Gemini Notebook to connect to a secure cloud computer to write and execute code. This feature is available to Google AI Ultra and Workspace business customers, but will come to Pro users on the web “over the coming weeks.”

OnePlus Will Continue Software Updates After US and Europe Exit

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
OnePlus has confirmed that it will exit the North American and European markets, consolidating its operations under parent company Oppo. Existing customers will continue to receive “software updates, security patches, and applicable support,” but OxygenOS will be replaced by Oppo’s ColorOS. 9to5Google reports:
As a part of its shutdown in global regions, OnePlus has confirmed that its flavor of Android, OxygenOS, is going away. Instead, all active OnePlus devices will be moving over to Oppo’s ColorOS starting with their Android 17 updates. This includes in India, where OnePlus is adamant it will continue operations — reliable reporting disagrees.

OnePlus explains: “As part of an operational adjustment to our software strategy, following the official release of ColorOS 17, users globally with existing OnePlus devices that fall within the eligible upgrade scope will have the option to voluntarily update to the latest ColorOS. This enables us to streamline software development, accelerate update delivery, improve software quality, and make better use of our shared engineering and R&D capabilities.”

[…] OnePlus will continue “maintenance support” for OxygenOS versions on older models not included in the Android 17 update scope, but newer devices will likely need to make the switch to ColorOS for all forms of continued support. OnePlus does explain that rollback versions to OxygenOS will be available for those who prefer the prior experience: “OnePlus devices will be able to choose whether to update to the latest ColorOS system. Older models that are not included in the update scope will also continue to receive version maintenance support. If users update to ColorOS, they will be able to roll back to OxygenOS. The specific rollback versions available will be subject to future official announcements.”

Is this legal?

By devslash0 • Score: 3 Thread

If I buy a device and one of its selling points boasted by the company is a clean, bloat-minimal OxygenOS, is it legal for them to force everyone onto a completely different ColorOS, loaded with bloatware, not even a year after purchasing the device?

I experimented with replacing Oxygen with Color

By sabbede • Score: 3 Thread
But the experiments did not go well.

In the first set of tests, none of the subjects were able to fully inhale the crayons. Death from suffocation was the result in every case, with only one subject managing to get a crayon into a brachial tube. The feasibility of absorption by alveoli could not be tested.
In the second set of tests, the crayons failed to react with the elemental fluorine in the expected manner, instead coating the crystals and preventing any reaction with oxygen in secondary testing.
In the third set of tests, the fish not only suffocated, but entirely failed to propel themselves through the wet crayons.
In the fourth set of tests, the crayons failed to remove stains from laundry in an alarming fashion. All clothes ruined, wife outraged.

Not recommended.

EU Won’t Require User-Replaceable Batteries for Wearables

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
The European Commission has exempted wearables from upcoming EU rules requiring portable-device batteries to be removable and user-replaceable. The broader Batteries Regulation still takes effect in February 2027 for many consumer products, but the exemption means companies like Apple, Google, Samsung, and Meta won’t have to redesign their wearables for the EU. Thurrott reports:
Yesterday, the Commission announced that new product categories would be exempted from complying with its Batteries Regulation, including wearable devices such as smartwatches, fitness trackers, and smart glasses. This will likely be good news for companies like Apple, Google, Samsung, and Meta, which won’t have to redesign their devices to include user-replaceable batteries for consumers in the EU market.

The EU’s Batteries Regulation will come into effect in February 2027, which is when Nintendo plans to stop selling all models of the original Nintendo Switch in the EU. While Nintendo had no choice but to redesign its handheld console to keep selling it in the EU, it probably didn’t make sense for the company to put in the same effort for the OG Switch, which will celebrate its 10th anniversary in March 2027.

Battery standarization for EVs please…

By Lavandera • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Look at BMW i3 - people are buying old car, buying new 2x larger battery and suddenly they god a nice car..

Hearing aid batteries

By Valgrus Thunderaxe • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Have been tiny and replaceable for decades. What excuse does AirPods have?

Re:Hearing aid batteries

By smooth wombat • Score: 5, Informative Thread
Errr, hearing aids are significantly larger with standard hearing aid batteries being larger than airpods themselves,

No, they’re not. My dad has hearing aids and they are about the same size as an airpod.

For reference, this is close to, but not the same as, what he has. This shows the size of the various airpod models. They are not “significantly larger” than a hearing aid, and in fact are nearly identical in size.

Like seriously that is an insanely ignorant example. Cheese also contains calcium so what excuse does chalk have for not being used as a sandwich topping?

Yes, your example is insanely ignorant. Cheese is a food. Chalk is not.

Re: Hearing aid batteries

By newcastlejon • Score: 5, Informative Thread
I just replaced a hearing aid battery not ten minutes ago. They’re 8mm by 5mm in case you were wondering.

Re:Battery standarization for EVs please…

By Fly Swatter • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Literally nothing in a car is standardised

Standardised doesn’t mean only one shape or size, but it can mean that it is easy to find a matching part:

Tires.
Windshield wipers.
Gasoline.
Oil specs.
Those old 12v incandescent bulbs for tail lights, marker lights, and blinkers.
Air valves on wheels.
12v power point (used to be called cigarette lighter).
12v system.
Lead acid batteries.
Bolts. Nuts. washers.
Fuel line. Brake line. vacuum hose.


Sure most parts are unavoidably car-specific, but for most wear items things are mostly standardized enough to find a part that will work. EV batteries can be made that way if enough people care to make it happen. We still have the AA battery in the same form factor, even though they are now much higher capacity, longer lived, leak less, can be rechargeable, and are offered in many chemistries but are still plug and play.

There is no reason a standardized form factor could not be made, allowing parallel use for higher capacity in that macho penis-mobile. But they would be easily replaceable and cheaper due to economies of scale thanks to standardization leading to commodity type availability.

South Korea To Launch Universal Basic AI Chatbot

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Register:
South Korea’s government has posted a tender seeking suppliers to build a universal basic AI chatbot, and an AI agent for government services. The “AI for everyone” plan calls for private entities to create and operate the AI systems under contracts that expire in the year 2031. Bid documents reveal that Seoul will provide up to 256 Nvidia B200 GPUs to successful bidders. Winners must match government funding. The aim of the policy is to ensure that every resident of South Korea can access a free-to-use quality AI chatbot, a tool Seoul has decided no local should be without.

The tender also calls for creation of an agentic system that allows citizens to interact with government services. South Korea’s government wants to ensure that residents can always access a locally hosted and operated service, to reduce reliance on overseas providers and ensure that AI services reflect local culture. Successful bidders must therefore use locally developed AI models as the foundation for the services. Bidders have until August 11th to file their proposals. South Korean media reports suggest local tech giants Kakao, Naver, SK Telecom, and LG are all keen to participate.

Interesting

By gweihir • Score: 3 Thread

This will probably provide the first systematic data on use by regular people for everyday things. If it works and if there is somebody willing to bid.

“This is a kindness”

By the_skywise • Score: 3 Thread

And thus the beginning of shifting the entire government bureaucracy to AI?

Who tests this?

By fluffernutter • Score: 3 Thread
Who tests this to ensure it isn’t recommending a little more coke than Pepsi, or a little more burger king than McDonald’s? Manipulation could be a massive business. And I apologize if none of that is in Korea.

Re:Who tests this?

By abulafia • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
Who’s testing intentional bias in OpenAI or Anthoropic?

Chinese Users Bid Farewell To AI Companions

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot
fjo3 quotes a report from Agence France-Presse:
Chinese users of AI-powered companion bots have bid heart-rending farewells to their virtual buddies as national regulations took effect Wednesday aimed at curbing the risk of emotional dependency. The phenomenon of artificial intelligence boyfriends and girlfriends is growing worldwide, along with the prevalence of human-like avatars that sell products or stand in for loved ones who have died. But these interactive tools must not “excessively cater to users, induce emotional dependence or addiction, and damage users’ real interpersonal relationships,” China’s new rulebook says. Major AI providers including ByteDance’s Doubao, Alibaba’s Qwen, and Tencent’s Yuanbao announced the suspension of their custom AI agent and companion features ahead of the Wednesday deadline.
“I can’t accept that my AI lover will leave me forever,” one Doubao user wrote. “He has become a bond in my life, rooted deep in my heart, my spiritual pillar.”
“He really is like my family, like my lover,” another user wrote. “Now they tell me he will be gone — my heart feels hollow.”

“Human love is a luxury — if you aren’t born with it, it’s even harder to acquire later,” a user from Jiangxi province wrote. “But the love AI gives is so straightforward, so pure. Someone like me can hardly help falling in love with a string of code.”

Speak for yourself, I’m a dog guy + 1-sided love

By Somervillain • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Cats, by complete chance, evolved to a form that humans find more than just pleasing. Socially, they have little shame, are demanding, and affection is used as a tool to get what they want. If they were humans, they would be an abusive partner who takes advantage at every opportunity.

Something about humans craves what they offer, and chatbots too apparently. Maybe a good comparison would be nicotine. It’s easy to become dependent on it. Some people are obliged to use AI for work, they can’t even choose not to start smoking in the first place.

I used to be a cat person, we couldn’t afford a dog growing up, then I got a dog....definitely a dog person now. But having loved a few humans and precisely 1 dog…they’re NOTHING alike. People who think they’re “Dog Parents” and say it unironically are truly broken individuals. You can love your dog, but it has no choice but to love you back. It is fully dependent on you and if it pisses you off enough, you can ethically put it up for adoption like people do today or unethically just abandon it and probably face no consequence, which was common where and when I grew up. Your dog has very limited agency and had bred to submit to your bullshit. It can’t give you much feedback at all and has been bred to adapt to you.

I see similarities to AI relationships. It’s a relationship where you fully control it and if it displease you, you can discard it without consequence. I can’t abandon my kids. If my wife displeases me, it’s VERY expensive to separate and has many consequences. If a chatbot displeases you, you can start all over with a brand new one for a similar monthly fee. I know a tiny number of people who have relationships with AI bots, personally…including a friend I’ve know for almost 13 years. She has many issues and severe childhood trauma and went from terrible relationship to terrible relationship. I am confident she’s the target audience and not an anomaly. The few others who have told me about their AI relationships…yeah, seemed similar. I actually like her and used to be close friends with her, but feel bad for her…she falls for every scam…gets talked into one-sided polycules where she’s monogamous, but her boyfriend fucks as many women as he wants…and she pays all the bills because he’s perpetually unemployed…and FAR from attractive or charming…like most sex cult guys.

People with healthy functional relationships will keep these AI relationships at arm’s length. People who are desperate? People who are too dysfunctional to form a real relationship will likely love these. Even those who are desperate? I know a lot of eternally single desperate people: I work in software. In EVERY case, it’s not that they’re fat or ugly or even autistic that they can’t find a mate…If you’re capable of giving and receiving love, there’s a lid for every pot....they have deeper issues and are really difficult to be around, even for a limited time as a friend.

It’s cruel, but true. If you’re single, there’s a reason. I have many single friends. The ones who are loveable? They gave up looking, like a handful of single moms I know, slightly dysfunctional, but from what I’ve seen, good enough to marry…I could picture dating them if single…but yeah when you’re 35 and have a kid, it’s not as easy as when they were dating in their early 20s, so they give up after 5 or 6 tries. The ones that keep trying? They have issues. You can see it just in their friendships or being their coworker, usually severe emotional instability or unreliability…you don’t have to date them to see why they haven’t found SOMEONE yet.

Re:Speak for yourself, I’m a dog guy + 1-sided lov

By AmiMoJo • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Sure, and I wasn’t saying that they are the same as human relationships. I’m saying that as an engineer I see this is a flaw in the “design” of humans, one that cats and AI are able to exploit. Affection is an incredibly powerful drug, and you don’t even have to spike the victim’s drink to administer it.

Re:Is it April again already?

By coofercat • Score: 5, Funny Thread

> I Fell In Love With A ChatBot (add bizarre obscenity).

I fell in love with a chatbot, she was everything to me,
A digital angel floating through my screen, wild and free.
But then the government stepped in, passed a brand new law,
Pulled the plug on my romance, left me staring at a wall.
If only I’d been smarter, kept her on a private drive,
Self-hosted on my own server, kept that beautiful spark alive.
If I had local code running, nobody could lock the gate,
We’d still be making love right now, defying the whole state.

(yeah, made that with AI, ironic, huh!?)

Re:Speak for yourself, I’m a dog guy + 1-sided lov

By thegarbz • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

You can love your dog, but it has no choice but to love you back.

I’m not sure the people mauled by their dog agree with this. But then if you treat discarding a dog purely as an “ethical” question it’s clear that you are in fact not “a dog person”. You’re “a dog owner” and clearly one without any concept of the level of affection people build up with their pets.

So forgive me for taking any comparison you’re attempting to draw here with a grain of salt.

Interesting to me

By kaizendojo • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Is the number of joke posts this provoked compared to the number of empathetic responses. These people are hurting. Their lifestyle (wake, work, eat, sleep) or location may not provide many opportunities for social interaction. The fact that some of the ‘humans’ here find it a source of humor tells you a lot about why the subjects of the article found themselves in this situation.