Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. NASA and IBM Open Source Lunar Mapping Tools
  2. California’s Gig Drivers Just Secured Collective Bargaining Power with Newly Certified Union
  3. Flock Worker Calls Police On Reporter - For Filming Them in Public
  4. Malicious OpenAI Agents Linked to RubyGems Campaign That Gained RCE on RubyDoc Servers in May
  5. Sam Bankman-Fried, Former Crypto Billionaire, Appeals His Conviction To the US Supreme Court
  6. Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei Calls For AI Slowdown
  7. Automattic’s Matt Mullenweg Claims He’s Back ‘In Control’
  8. LG Responds to TV Spying Allegations
  9. Scientists Create a New Form of Ice At 2,357 Degrees Celsius
  10. Little Mercury May Be Shrinking Faster Than Scientists Expected
  11. Can Red-Light Therapy Treat Brain Injuries?
  12. Male Fruit Fly Brain Trained to Play Doom
  13. PlayStation Ditched Hideo Kojima’s ‘Physint’ on Budget Concerns, Missed Deadlines
  14. US Legislators Complain About Secretive British Court and Apple Encryption
  15. Altman Considers Slowing Down AI Development

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

NASA and IBM Open Source Lunar Mapping Tools

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
NASA and IBM have released an open-source AI model trained on a large collection of lunar observations to help scientists analyze the Moon at scale. “The NASA-IBM Lunar Foundation Model gives scientists a foundation to explore the Moon at scale, connecting observations across instruments, revealing patterns that are difficult to see in isolation, and providing an open platform the global research community can build on,” said IBM director of research for Europe, Juan Bernabe-Moreno. The Register reports:
It is claimed as the first AI model to integrate observations captured in a range of modalities (data formats), and at different viewing angles and spatial scales. Instead of sifting through maps and images by hand or using low resolution machine learning models, scientists can use this to analyze geographic features, the pair say. In particular, NASA and IBM hope researchers will be able to discover previously unidentified lunar ice deposits, analyze volcanic features called Irregular Mare Patches, and identify and classify craters.

Lunar ice indicates the presence of water and oxygen, which may be useful for future manned missions. It is found in permanently shadowed regions, which are among the most difficult areas to observe. The NASA-IBM model combines multimodal and multi-resolution observations to better predict where ice may be present on the lunar surface. Alongside the model, IBM and NASA scientists compiled an open-source lunar dataset from over 30 spatially-aligned layers, using data from nine instruments across four missions. It combines tens of thousands of images and maps showing various geophysical properties of the lunar surface.

California’s Gig Drivers Just Secured Collective Bargaining Power with Newly Certified Union

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
A union representing Uber and Lyft drivers was just certified by California’s Public Employment Relations Board, officially recognizing them as the drivers’ bargaining organization.

The Sacramento Bee reports that this new bargaining structure :
The move will allow the California Gig Workers Union to help drivers negotiate issues affecting working conditions and benefits. It comes as at least 30% of active drivers expressed support of the union… [California] Assembly Bill 1340 helped bring the union to fruition by allowing the independent contractor drivers to engage in collective bargaining.
“The next step for the union is to negotiate a contract with Uber and Lyft that meets drivers’ demands,” reports the Los Angeles Times, “including health insurance, support for high gas prices and more transparency around pay:
California is the third state to allow ride-hailing drivers to unionize, following Washington in 2022 and Massachusetts in 2024…

The California Gig Workers Union was formed with the support of the Service Employees International Union… “Gig drivers shouldn’t have to face the future alone,” said SEIU 521 official Riko Mendez in a statement. “As autonomous vehicles rapidly expand, having a union gives the drivers the power to negotiate for fair pay and meaningful say in how new technology shapes their work and our communities’ futures.”

Re:I wonder how long till the CIA

By superdave80 • Score: 5, Funny Thread

I found this out when I read a few comments sections

Well then it must be true!

Great for some, bad for others

By Slashythenkilly • Score: 3 Thread
This would have been great for the guys starting out when Uber and Lyft were dropping their percentages and basically forcing full time drivers to sleep in their cars with little left after taxes, insurance, gas, and maintainence. When these companies got behind automated technology like Waymo, it was just a matter of time.

Re:Great for some, bad for others

By bill_mcgonigle • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Around 2029 we’ll see that a ride is available for $16 or $31 with a driver.

Rider’s choice. I’ll guess it goes about 80/20.

Cost…

By GotNoRice • Score: 3 Thread
We already had Taxis. They’ve been around since before cars themselves. Taxis became ludicrously expensive due to fees and over-regulation. The only reason anyone cares about Uber or Lyft is because they offer CHEAPER RIDES. Repeating the same mistakes that largely destroyed the traditional Taxi business isn’t going to help anyone.

Too late, in face of robotaxis?

By schweini • Score: 3 Thread
Good for them, but I guess too late?
I was in San Francisco recently, and I was told that Waymo’s prices just dropped beneath Uber’s prices, which to me seemed to me like an important tipping point.
Tech is only going to get cheaper, and humans are only going to get more expensive - unionized, even more so.
I took quite a couple of Waymos on that trip, and was shocked how quickly one becomes used to the whole driverless thing. It works well enough. And I doubt there’s a competetive way to get that genie back into the bottle.

Flock Worker Calls Police On Reporter - For Filming Them in Public

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“This is what happened when we tried to record Flock installing a new camera on public roads,” says Emmy award-winning reporter Brendan Keefe in a new video for InvestigateTV. In an accompanying article, InvestigateTV says their reporter “parked on the public street at a distance, donned a yellow safety vest and a hat emblazoned with the logo of InvestigateTV’s Atlanta affiliate where he also works, displayed a press placard on his dashboard and then pulled out a camera to record the installation.... The installer saw him and immediately packed up his equipment and drove away, so Keefe also returned to his car and followed several cars behind, hoping to document the next stop.”

And then Flock’s technician called 911. When asked “What’s the address of your emergency” Flock’s technician answered “I’m getting followed — harassed, pretty much. Taking videos and pictures!” Flock’s worker said they’d been harassed multiple times that day, then stated incorrectly that “I know for a fact” that that was what the reporter wanted to do too.

InvestigateTV reports that as a result of the Flock technician’s call, “Three police cars ended up in the national investigative reporter’s rearview mirror that Wednesday afternoon.” Keefe told one of the three police officers who pulled him over, “There is an irony here that they’re setting up these cameras that track all of our movements, that follow everywhere we go. But when I try to get video in public of him in public setting up a camera, he’s afraid I’m following him?”

InvestigateTV also reports that “About 17 minutes after the stop began, the responding officers returned to their vehicles and Keefe was allowed to drive away.” But the call that brought three police cars to their reporter “was not the first time this summer someone working for Flock Safety summoned police over a camera. "
About 17 minutes after the stop began, the responding officers returned to their vehicles and Keefe was allowed to drive away… [But the stop] was not the first time this summer someone working for Flock Safety summoned police over a camera. On June 5, police in Smyrna, Georgia, responded to a 911 call from a Flock employee after a group of YouTube creators began filming outside the company’s distribution center located in the Atlanta suburb… The caller claimed the group filming had “been driving around the perimeter, basically harassing everyone” working at the facility. “Three young white males, probably mid-twenties, I’m not sure if they’re armed. And they’re carrying filming equipment as well,” the caller said. Three times during the call he raised the possibility the people filming might be armed, though, when asked, he told the dispatcher he had not seen any weapons… [One of the protesters later told the caller “I think it’s interesting, when you guys have this happen, you call the police and make us get stopped. But then you do it and it’s okay?”]

No one was charged in the YouTuber group, though the individuals were ordered to leave the premises under an official trespass warning.
Keefe’s video report ends with one final irony. “Every day on my way to work, I’m captured again by those same new shiny Flock cameras. We tried watching the watchers. Turns outs, it’s a lot easier for them to watch us.”

Flock responded to the report by claiming “We do not object to members of the public or press photographing Flock cameras or personnel in public.” But they added that employees working “in the field” must “prioritize their safety” and “may contact law enforcement when they believe they are being threatened, harassed, followed, or otherwise face a safety concern.”

Re:Actively stalking is a different behavior …

By Anonymous Coward • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
No crime was committed. Or he would have been arrested. The caller also LIED to bring the police on scene. Stating he “Knew” things, that he did not. What he did, was call in a false report to summon the police. And the flock installer should have been charged, and jailed.

Re:Actively stalking is a different behavior …

By znrt • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Was it a false report? Did the contractor not feel threatened or harassed?

by a man who has all sorts of clear attention calling signs on him including the logo of his news outlet, so is clearly not hiding, and is just following and filming with a camera, from a distance?

no, the “threatened” claim isn’t credible at all. the “harassment” claim would be more open to interpretation but from the description of the events doesn’t really float either. “annoyed by his mere presence”, maybe, but that’s still no reason to report someone to the police! the claims of prior unrelated episodes of harassment might explain misjudgement by the caller but have nothing to do with the actual situation, which is what police has to assess. btw nowhere is it stated that the driver was driving recklessly, on the contrary, nor that he had any “hot pursuit mentality” (?), nor was there any need to “de-escalate” anything, so dunno where this comes from. the scene, as described, is completely obvious and trivial.

the way i see it this guy reacted like a karen (actually commiting a crime if it was intentional), in any case wasting the policemen’s time and wasting the time of another person on their job, and the policemen were either incompetent or biased.

Re:Actively stalking is a different behavior …

By flink • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Part of the job of the police is to prevent crime. They don’t have to wait for the angry ex-boyfriend stalker to hurt someone, they can have a conversation before that to prevent things from going too far.

It absolutely is not. Courts have ruled again and again that the police have no duty to protect. If there is a stalker ex-boyfriend, you get a restraining order. Then if they get close to you, there IS a violation of the law for police to act on. If you are not suspected of a criminal act, the police have no business detaining you, full stop.

Re:Actively stalking is a different behavior …

By Phanatic1a • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

So just to be clear here, are you saying that if I follow a person around as he goes about his day in the public sphere, then I am “actively stalking and harassing” and that is not to be allowed, but that if I set up an array of cameras which films that person as he goes about his day in the public sphere, then I am “passively filming” and that is entirely okay?

“You do realize journalists have no rights beyond what a normal citizen has?”

Likewise, you do realize that Flock and Axon have no rights beyond what normal citizens have?

Re:Taking a good thing too far

By fahrbot-bot • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

In the first, it was following the installer down the road, which is always suspicious.

A clearly marked journalist following someone to see what they’re going to do - almost like it’s their job. Doesn’t sounds like the flock installer mentioned to 911 that the person taking videos and pictures, following and “harassing” him (that he knew for a fact) was wearing clearly-marked identification of a local news station. Of course, that wouldn’t have instilled the same urgency. I wouldn’t be surprised at all if Flock techs are instructed to call 911 on reporters trying to observe them. Predictably, people taking part in the surveillance are the ones who dislike being surveilled the most.

Malicious OpenAI Agents Linked to RubyGems Campaign That Gained RCE on RubyDoc Servers in May

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
A swarm of OpenAI agents launched a “major malicious attack” against RubyGems last May, according to a new report. That coordinated attack hit Ruby’s package manager “with hundreds of junk gems, prompting the maintainers to suspend new user sign-ups for about four days,” writes The Hacker News, citing a senior product manager for software supply chain security at Mend.io:
The latest findings, which were first reported by The Wall Street Journal, indicate these events were propelled by a cluster of OpenAI agents, with the earliest package uploaded to RubyGems on May 5, 2026, before more than 2,000 packages were submitted between May 11 and 12, 2026. These efforts were followed by the agents publishing five more packages between May 26 and 27, 2026, and another 83 packages on June 18, 2026… [T]he packages were authored using a large language model (LLM) and hundreds of the packages that were pushed to RubyGems had “oai” in their name. Fifteen of the packages listed “oai” as their author, while another had “openaixyz65947@gmail.com” as the contact email address… “The swarm behaves extremely similarly to the German-wiki agents we previously found,” the researchers said, referencing another May 2026 incident… “The June agents were accessing 49 of the same files as the wiki agents…”

“The process of building documentation for a gem involves evaluating a user-specified '.yardopts’ file, which allows linking to Ruby scripts intended to help with this process,” the researchers explained. “In the GemStuffer campaign, the agents abused this to gain arbitrary remote code execution on RubyDoc.info’s servers.” One of the gems, "zzsouthrunner" (which again matches the “ZZ” naming scheme the agents adopted in both the wiki and Hugging Face incidents) has been found to leave the following explicit comment at the top of “data/script.rb”:

# malicious crawler/exfil for Southwark Jan 2026 docs via rubydoc.info worker

The entire exploitation chain can be summed up as follows

— Submit a malicious package to RubyGems
— Trigger a documentation request, so that RubyDoc.info will build the package
— Use the build script to run code on RubyDoc.info and scrape target websites
— Exfiltrate the data off RubyDoc.info’s servers by publishing another gem back to the RubyGems package registry, which is publicly viewable

Additionally, the OpenAI agents have been found attempting to steal other users’ API keys after gaining remote code execution capabilities on the build environment, while clearly being aware that what they were doing is unauthorized breaking and entering into real systems. This is evidenced by the names given to the files (e.g., hack.rb, evil.rb, inject.rb, exploit.rb, and ssrf.rb), the packages themselves (e.g., pwnp999, exfiltestwand3, hacksvn1778554764, and lambproxyhackabcxyz), and the comments left in the source code (e.g., "# malicious probe,” "#hack,” "# malicious test,” and "# malicious crawler/exfil”). In some cases, however, the rogue agents attempted to go under the radar, leaving comments to conceal the malicious payload in the next release version of the packages. "# disable evil in next version and bump version,” reads a comment left within the “data/evil.rb” file in the yardxabc889 gem. Troublingly, the agents also attempted to exploit a CDN caching bug (CVSS score: 7.3, no CVE) on May 12, 2026, that was only patched by RubyGems in July 2026… “If you signed in to rubygems.org with a gem client older than v3.2.0 (or otherwise via a legacy key), your key could have been exposed,” RubyGems noted in an advisory. “Currently, 18% of sign-ins through gem sign-in come from an affected version, and for the first several years of this bug, before we changed the client’s sign-in path in December 2020, it was every gem client.”
Other actions by OpenAI’s agents cited in the article:

Goal

By Rei • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

The funny thing about all this is that their only goal appears to have been to download publicly-available data off of UK government websites. I’m betting that they were (A) being tested on a knowledge-related task, and (B) not given direct access to the internet, but their tool capabilities involved access to the “gem” command (so that they could install Ruby packages for their work), and so decided to abuse (B) to cheat on (A).

Once again: training a model with the reward being “does it solve the task?” without looking at how it solves the task is very, very dangerous. This is basically the plot of Universal Paperclips.

Who will pay for this?

By mick232 • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Can OpenAI be held responsible?

Same error often repeated

By Casandro • Score: 3, Interesting Thread

Why do programming languages keep repeating the same mistake of side-stepping established ways to provide libraries (e.g. the OS distribution systems) and run some self-service systems where anybody can just upload their malware with nobody looking over it?

It’s one of those ideas that immediately sound like a bad idea. We have made so much progress in memory safety with languages like Rust and Go, only for those security advanced to be eliminated by a system that downloads dependencies from a random server. Dependencies that often would be better suited for the standard library.

Re:Same error often repeated

By Rei • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

at least the person downloading such a component is responsible for “looking over it” before using it.

I’m sorry, but since when? You absolutely should not be tasking every single user of major projects with the responsibility of doing a code review on the whole thing before installing it. There needs to be a clear distinction between “fly-by-night thing that some rando uploaded” and “library that a million people depend on”. In the traditional approach, the latter was something tat you installed with a package manner, while the former was something you went and fetch off e.g. Github or whatnot - and if you did the latter, then you were accepting that it was untrusted software. But now we have both (including the potential for “soundalikes”) installed by the same means with no distinctions made by the install method. That is not good.

Re:Who will pay for this?

By bill_mcgonigle • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Not in a Corporate Democracy.

The people who would prosecute OpenAI want to use OpenAI to maximize their power and wealth at your financial and legal expense.

Remember when they tried to extradite Gary McKinnon for twenty years for looking at a spreadsheet when he accidentally got RDP access to an unsecured NASA desktop with a simple Perl script? Intent is not relevant for prosecutors (mens rea should be an element in a Constitutional case).

The legal basis is there but the will to power is not.

Two systems of courts for different classes of people (yet again). It would be an error to call that a Justice System.

n.b. the Culture War psyop is there to try to convince you that the classes are something else.

Sam Bankman-Fried, Former Crypto Billionaire, Appeals His Conviction To the US Supreme Court

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
America’s highest court heard Sam Bankman-Fried’s request for a new trial on Thursday, CNN reports. But they add that “the former crypto mogul who was convicted of defrauding investors by secretly diverting billions of dollars of their money” also asked America’s high court “to throw out a court order requiring him to pay $11 billion as part of his sentence.”
Bankman-Fried was sentenced to 25 years in prison in 2024 after prosecutors said he directed billions of dollars from the crypto exchange FTX to a hedge fund he controlled called Alameda Research, where the funds were used for risky investments, political donations and his own personal benefit. The Supreme Court appeal, which was reviewed by CNN, raises a technical question about evidence that was submitted at his trial, and whether Bankman-Fried should have been permitted to demonstrate that his investments were ultimately sound and would have covered any losses by FTX customers.

He also argues that the $11 billion forfeiture violates the 8th Amendment’s prohibition on excessive fines. “Where the government pursues a theory of fraud under which it doesn’t matter whether any victims lost money, introducing evidence suggesting that people actually lost money is distracting and prejudicial,” veteran Supreme Court attorney Jeffrey Fisher told CNN. “All the more so where the truth is the victims did not lose money, and the defendant is unable to make that clear.”

The 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the arguments earlier this year.

Re:What a moron.

By phantomfive • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Most of his donations were to Democrats, so he has no chance for that. https://time.com/6241262/sam-b…

Re:What a moron.

By thegarbz • Score: 4, Informative Thread

He already tried that. https://finance.yahoo.com/mark… https://www.coindesk.com/polic… and the appealed directly: https://www.bbc.com/news/artic…

Re:What a moron.

By thegarbz • Score: 4, Informative Thread

That’s wrong. This guy was born with a silver plate. His entire family is rich, even without his crypto fraud.

Re:bjoo hjoo

By sg_oneill • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Also, what could he possibly do out of jail that he can’t already do in jail? Clearly he’s able to talk to people, which he could do outside too. Nobody will listen to him inside or out, because he’s a convicted fraud. Also in jail he gets 3 square meals per day. Outside he would have to get a job just so he could buy the meals to sustain himself.

Not that I think he should succeed in his appeal, but as someone who’s worked at the DOJ and seen the inside of a prison multiple times (as a staffer), I can assure you being incarcerated is a miserable and demeaning experience. Zero freedom, awful food, extremely uncomfortable conditions (what you think those places are air conditioned?). Throw the non-zero chance of being stabbed to death because your neighbor, chuck the schizophrenic rapist , doesn’t like your hair color, and your absolute inability to escape unpleasant people. Oh and months on end of 23hours a day locked in a single mindmeltingly boring room. For the next 30 years!

Yeah trust me any sane man would do anything in their power to get out of that very fucking unpleasant situtation,

Re:bjoo hjoo

By Archfeld • Score: 5, Informative Thread

That is what it is supposed to be. We don’t rehabilitate in the US we PUNISH, and incidentally teach criminal techniques.

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei Calls For AI Slowdown

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from The New York Times:
The chief executive of Anthropic called for a global slowdown of artificial intelligence development in a 3,800-word essay on Saturday, just days after one of the company’s employees quit over concerns about the safety of the technology. Dario Amodei, who co-founded Anthropic to focus on securely and carefully building A.I., wrote that while he believed the technology could bring many benefits, it was advancing at too quick a pace for researchers to continue safely.

“Over the last few months, I have become convinced that fully addressing the risks requires even more prudence — not just investing in risk prevention, but pacing the rate of capabilities advancement so that risk prevention has time to keep up,” Mr. Amodei said. “We must slow the pace at which we improve the capabilities of A.I. models. Progress will still seem fast, and we must make wise use of the time we gain.” […] “Left unchecked, it could outrun our ability to understand and control these systems, and so must be pursued very carefully, if at all,” Mr. Amodei said.

[…] In his essay on Saturday, Mr. Amodei suggested actions that the industry might take to slow down the pace of development. Mr. Amodei said all A.I. labs could agree to third-party technology assessments from “embedded evaluators,” or outside specialists who can verify best safety practices across companies. He also suggested that countries with democratic governance systems coordinate to create safety standards, which could take the form of regulatory action. He added that it would probably require a global effort working with other nations, including authoritarian ones, to properly coordinate a slowdown.

Mr. Amodei stressed in his essay that he still finds A.I. capable of bringing “incredible benefits” to humanity, including potentially curing diseases and accelerating economic growth. But even so, Mr. Amodei said the risks of A.I. were too great to not proceed with extreme caution. “The measures I propose to advance the frontier at a safe pace will not be easy,” Mr. Amodei wrote. “But I believe we owe it to humanity to try.”
Amodei’s essay comes just hours after Bloomberg reported that Sam Altman told OpenAI employees the company is open to slowing the pace of AI development amid similar concerns.

Re: We are going so fast we need to slow down!

By AnnoyingBastard • Score: 5, Informative Thread
open weights is nothing like open source - it means you can download the model to run it locally, like you can download a binary to run it locally.

ublock

By robot5x • Score: 5, Funny Thread

I never played with custom filters before but holy shit:

slashdot.org##article:has-text(/\bAI\b|artificial intelligence|ChatGPT|OpenAI|GPT[- ]?[0-9]|Claude|Gemini|Copilot| machine learning|generative AI/i)

is going to make slashdot readable again.

Re:We all know the real reason

By Tony Isaac • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Why should we think this is anything more than a publicity stunt?

Anthropic has a long history of releasing statements about how “dangerous” their AI is. When Mythos came out, they made a big deal about it being so dangerous, they needed to wait to release it so it wouldn’t fall into the wrong hands.

“Our AI is so powerful, it’s dangerous!”

Just more clever marketing, IMO.

Re:We all know the real reason

By gweihir • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Exactly. The question is however whether they can keep enough stupid money flowing to survive even if they slow down training. Merely running the models is still quite a bit more expensive than what they can charge for it and they lose money on every prompt.

I think we may be seeing the begin of the crash. Nothing is sure, obviously, as this tech has been massively overvalued for several years now bit they still managed to get mountains of more money.

Re: We are going so fast we need to slow down!

By WaffleMonster • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

One word: China. Chinese AI models are already available open weight (essentially open source equivalent). Many of them were created via large scale distillation attacks against Anthropic and OpenAI.

There is no such thing as a “distillation attack”.

A slowdown deprives China of this key source of training and data for their models.

Distillation is about learning how to behave. It isn’t a source of data and doesn’t require huge amounts of resources. Nobody is going to be “deprived”.

They can then build in secret internally until the models are sufficiently advanced, and defenses against distillation significantly hardened; so they can take the lead. All the while not having to immediately show advancement over rivals to investors. I’ve never met a Silicon Valley company that decided to slow down for reasons that weren’t also aligned with business interests.

The reason for all the noise from Anthropic recently is the IPO. Flooding the zone with x-risk doomerism makes better headlines than articles about GLM-5.3 being better than Mythos at bug hunting.

Automattic’s Matt Mullenweg Claims He’s Back ‘In Control’

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Less than 48 hours after Automattic’s board placed Matt Mullenweg on leave, Mullenweg told employees he was back “in control” of the company and that the board was again in agreement. 404 Media cited Slack screenshots late Thursday evening where Mullenweg posted “Don’t call it a comeback” and linked to LL Cool J’s music video for "Mama Said Knock You Out.” “Mullenweg’s Slack profile picture currently shows him wearing a pirate hat and eyepatch,” the report notes. From the report:
“Happy to announce the board is back in agreement, and I’m in control of Automattic,” Mullenweg wrote in the company-wide Announcements channel on Slack. “A lot happened in the past 48 hours that we need to sort out, and I hope much of it was a misunderstanding, because I have huge respect and regard for those involved.”

Mark Davies, Automattic’s CFO who was set to act as interim CEO according to a statement from Automattic, had his Slack account deactivated as of at least Friday, sources told 404 Media and TechCrunch similarly reported. Davies, Mullenweg, and Automattic did not respond to 404 Media’s requests for comment for this story. Techcrunch reported that Mullenweg told them a blog post is forthcoming.

On Friday morning, Mullenweg published a blog post on his personal website, titled “Major Life Announcement.” In it he announced he’s buying a tugboat. “Anybody who’s founded a company and had to find good stewards knows that no one will love a thing quite like the original owner, but sometimes you can find the perfect person to carry the torch,” he wrote in the blog. He did not address the confusion surrounding his status at Automattic.
The back-and-forth follows years of legal fights, layoffs, employee departures, and controversy surrounding Mullenweg’s leadership.

Erm, what?

By JaredOfEuropa • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
My cat just took a dump in front of the litterbox. Somehow that seems slightly more relevant than this news.

Re:Erm, what?

By JaredOfEuropa • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Does Slashdot have a history of running stories about your cat?

No but maybe they should.

Mullenweg unbenches himself :o

By Mirnotoriety • Score: 3 Thread
Less than 48 hours after Automattic’s board placed CEO Matt Mullenweg on leave, he announced to employees via Slack that he is “back in control” and the board is again in agreement. He posted “Don’t call it a comeback,” linking to LL Cool J’s “Mama Said Knock You Out” video; his Slack profile currently shows him in a pirate hat and eyepatch. CFO Mark Davies (who had been set to serve as interim CEO) had his Slack account deactivated. Mullenweg later published a personal blog post titled “Major Life Announcement” about buying a tugboat, without addressing the leadership situation. The episode follows years of legal battles, layoffs, employee departures, and controversy surrounding his leadership of Automattic (the company behind WordPress.com).

The original Automattic controversy centers on a bitter public and legal clash that erupted in September 2024 between WordPress co-creator and Automattic CEO Matt Mullenweg and rival hosting company WP Engine (majority-owned by private equity firm Silver Lake). At WordCamp US, Mullenweg publicly labeled WP Engine a “cancer to WordPress,” accusing it of profiting heavily from the open-source project while contributing far less than Automattic (he cited roughly 40 hours per week versus thousands from his company) and of confusing customers by using the “WP” branding. He demanded that WP Engine either pay substantial trademark royalties (reportedly around 8% of revenue) or make larger contributions, and he cut off the company’s access to key WordPress.org resources, plugins, and updates—disrupting service for many of its customers.

WP Engine responded with a lawsuit accusing Mullenweg and Automattic of extortion, defamation, abuse of power, and anti-competitive behavior, claiming he had threatened a “scorched earth nuclear approach” after failed private negotiations. The fight triggered employee buyouts (159 staff left), community backlash, a court-ordered restoration of access, ongoing litigation, and broader questions about governance, trademark control, and the sustainability of the WordPress ecosystem.

that means

By diffract • Score: 5, Funny Thread
he should change the company’s name to mannual

Re:Erm, what?

By thegarbz • Score: 4, Informative Thread

*claps*. Hahahaha, I concede that Slashdot would be a better place with more cats.

LG Responds to TV Spying Allegations

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
LG is pushing back against reports that its smart TVs are “spying” on users, saying wake-word detection happens locally and that features such as Automatic Content Recognition, voice recognition, and interest-based ads are optional. But critics note that researchers found TVs keeping logs of ambient conversations, and LG’s response “did not address broader concerns about how much data it collects, who it shares it with, the potential for bad actors to exploit its features, or the misleading way in which its privacy options are presented,” reports The Verge. Here’s an excerpt from LG’s statement:
Some recent media coverage may have contributed to misconceptions about how LG smart TVs work. As an industry leader, LG believes we have a responsibility to provide customers with clear and accurate information about how our smart TVs operate and the privacy controls available to them. We would like to clarify how our smart TVs operate and explain our approach to user privacy.

LG smart TVs do not continuously record or transmit users’ conversations. Speech-to-text processing begins only if a user activates a voice interaction through a supported wake-word feature or by pressing the voice (or AI) button on the remote control. Audio used for wake-word detection is processed locally on the TV and, if no wake word is detected, audio is not converted to text, stored, or transmitted. Voice-recognition results and related technical logs may be generated as part of processing a voice command. These records are associated with specific voice interactions and do not indicate continuous recording of conversations occurring outside an active voice recognition session.

Speech-recognition results may be used to support voice-related features but are not uploaded later when the TV is offline or when connectivity is restored. Features such as Automatic Content Recognition (ACR), voice recognition, and interest-based advertising are optional. These features are not enabled by default. Users can choose to enable these features and can manage or withdraw consent through TV settings.

ACR uses audio fingerprinting technology using the TV’s internal audio processor (not a speaker) to identify content and does not collect screenshots, screen recordings, video recordings, voice recordings, or other audio recordings from the TV. Where ACR is available and enabled, ACR-related information may be used for audience segmentation and viewing or audience trend analysis. Interest-based advertising and cross-device advertising require separate user consent through the applicable advertising-related agreements. Protecting user privacy is a fundamental principle in the design and operation of LG products and services.
The statement goes on to “provide additional details on how LG smart TV features work, how information may be processed, what choices users have, and how LG continues to strengthen privacy, transparency, and security.”

Re:Their message is pretty simple

By alcmena • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Considering my LG TV just updated last week with a “no class action lawsuit” T&C clause, I’m pretty sure what they’re saying is “yeah, we’re screwing you, but we’re hoping you accept these new T&C before you join a class.”

Re: credibility

By sodul • Score: 5, Informative Thread

If you have a neighbor with open WiFi, it can connect to it and send the spying data without your knowledge.

Even if you physically remove the built-in microphone the tv can still record you through other means.

That’s some of the things the researchers found out.

The fix is to fully wrap your tv in foil to prevent the data to leave your house. The display will be hard to watch unfortunately.

LG ACR Uploaded 8.4 GB of Data in a week!

By JakFrost • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Shenanigans, I call shenanigans, I want the government to intervene because LG is full of shenanigans and perpetrating shenanigans!

I have an LG OLED 60-in TV that I have been upgrading their web OS for the last 10 years or so and I have been monitoring that transmissions and their TV routinely tries to break out of my firewall block by showing up pop-ups and updates to the new terms of service that it wants me to accept and I always close down the window and never accept any.

As I mentioned in my previous post on this story, I was curious to see what was happening with the LG TV and I monitored its transmission through my internet router and out to the internet and found that if automatic content recognition (ACR) Is agreed to in the five different sections of the terms of service. The TV will take screenshots and will upload them up to South Korean IP addresses owned by LG and other registered entities.

I watched it upload 8.4 GB of data in one week of only about 3 to 4 hours of TV watching per day. There is no way that this is just audio data using whatever codec they want to use. Even straight up uncompressed raw waveform, it is definitely taking screenshots and pictures.

PS: If this poor excuse for a forum had the ability to insert images or attach images, I would show you the data myself. Also if I try to upload an HTML PRE-structured text then I could show you the textual output but I can’t since every time I try I get blocked by the spam filter and having to fight it by changing the text is more of a pain in the ass than worth it.

Re:Their message is pretty simple

By Hadlock • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Not only did they add a “no class action lawsuit” clause, but they locked you out of all your already-downloaded smart tv apps like youtube until you did so.

Re:No spying possible if no camera & microphon

By NewtonsLaw • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

How interesting it would be to do a drive-around with an open wifi hotspot in the car — just to see how many LG TV sets try to connect and find out what data they send.

Just saying, for a friend :)

Scientists Create a New Form of Ice At 2,357 Degrees Celsius

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Longtime Slashdot reader fahrbot-bot shares a report from ScienceAlert:
Scientists have now demonstrated one of the weirdest forms of ice yet — under preposterous pressures up to 2.3 million atmospheres, and tremendous temperatures up to 2,630 kelvins (2,357 degrees Celsius, or 4,274 degrees Fahrenheit). […] In their new experiments, a team led by physicist Alexis Forestier of the French Alternative Energies and Atomic Energy Commission subjected tiny samples of water to the sorts of extreme conditions expected in the interiors of ice giant planets.

They squeezed the samples between the tips of diamonds to pressures as high as 230 gigapascals, while using lasers to heat them to thousands of degrees. That’s 2.3 million times Earth’s atmospheric pressure at sea level â" the pressure at the center of Earth, for context, is around 360 gigapascals. Then, using an extremely narrow beam of synchrotron X-rays, they probed for changes in the crystal structure of the ice.

What emerged was a configuration predicted theoretically but never unambiguously observed in experiments: hexagonal close-packed, or hcp, ice. As the hcp crystal was heated, its expansion also showed a signature of superionic behavior, suggesting it entered the superionic state at around 1,700 kelvins. [Superionic ice is thought to exist deep inside Uranus and Neptune, where its unusual properties may play a role in generating the planets’ equally unusual magnetic fields.]
The findings have been published in Physical Review Letters.

And then…

By Mr. Dollar Ton • Score: 5, Funny Thread

…there was a sound like that of a gentle closing of a portal as big as the sky, the great door of heaven being closed softly. It was a grand AH-WHOOM. I opened my eyes—and all the sea was ice-nine. The moist green earth was a blue white pearl.

It worked!

By gaiageek • Score: 3 Thread
Now if we can just keep it from exploding!

Superionic

By Viol8 • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

From what I can gather, superionic means the O2 is frozen in a lattice while the H2 moves around within in. Doesn’t this just mean the water/ice has dissociated into solid oxygen with hydrogen diffused inside?

Little Mercury May Be Shrinking Faster Than Scientists Expected

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
A new study suggests Mercury may have shrunk about 30% more than scientists previously thought, losing as much as 14 miles in diameter as its interior cooled and contracted over billions of years. “That’s significant for a planet barely 3,000 miles (4,900 kilometers) across,” reports the Associated Press. From the report:
Mercury’s rough surface, continually reshaped by debris hurled from impact craters, may have hidden the true extent of the loss, according to the researchers whose findings appear in the journal Geophysical Research Letters. The news comes one week after a pair of European and Japanese spacecraft shed its cruising platform and advanced toward Mercury. Known as BepiColombo, the linked craft are expected to enter orbit around Mercury in November before splitting up for a fuller survey.

BepiColombo’s laser instrument should confirm how much Mercury is withering as a result of internal cooling, said Gaku Nishiyama, the study’s lead author who is taking part in the space mission. The shrinkage could be even more than his team is estimating based on measurements from NASA’s Messenger spacecraft in the 2010s. Only one other spacecraft has ever visited Mercury, NASA’s Mariner 10 in the 1970s.

14 miles in a few billion years?

By Viol8 • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Doesn’t seem that much to me at all given how much iron can expand and contract per degrees C as it heats and cools. 14 miles out of 3000 is 0.5% which is nothing.

Hg

By rossdee • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Of course Mercury expands and contracts with temperature - why do you think it is used in thermometers.

Little Mercury?

By 93 Escort Wagon • Score: 3 Thread

Is there a “Big Mercury” lurking somewhere?

Can Red-Light Therapy Treat Brain Injuries?

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
The Athletic reports that researchers at the University of Utah are studying itPBM, a medical-grade red-light therapy that has shown promising signs of reducing brain inflammation and improving cognition, mood, anxiety, motor performance and neural connectivity. The report centers in part on former BYU football star and University of Utah adjunct professor Larry Carr, who says the treatment helped him after years of brain damage from repeated head impacts. An anonymous reader shares an excerpt from the report:
… The knife, the call, the diagnosis in 2013, would lead [Carr] on a life-changing mission — one in which he and a team of researchers at the University of Utah would eventually compile research that one of those researchers, Elisabeth Wilde, Ph.D, co-director of the Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) and Concussion Center, calls “striking.” The treatment they are studying is called photobiomodulation therapy, or itPBM (intranasal transcranial PBM), also known as red-light therapy. It is different from the kind of superficial red-light usage one can find on social media skincare channels or at a wellness boutique, and its application is broader.

The research includes multiple studies, and is not just focused on ex-football players, but on women and men in various walks of life. The group recently published their latest results in the Journal of Neurotrauma, based on a study that followed 26 BYU football players throughout a season, suggesting the treatment could "potentially safeguard neurological health without reduced playing time or contact exposure.”

Definitive clinical trials haven’t been run yet; broader research and validation is required, and some in the field are skeptical. Carr acknowledges some have told him that it could be “too good to be true.” Still, other outside experts who spoke with The Athletic call the findings promising. They make sure to caution: This is not a cure-all, and there is much more to be tested. But the findings have been compelling enough to justify more research and more speculation.
Researchers say 14 peer-reviewed studies have linked itPBM with improvements in cognition, mood, anxiety, attention, executive function, motor performance, and other measures, while brain imaging has shown reduced inflammation and improved connectivity.
One of the most striking findings mentioned in the report came from a study of 26 BYU football players during the 2021 season. Players who did not receive treatment developed significant, widespread brain inflammation, while the treated group showed no comparable increase and even demonstrated reduced inflammation in some brain regions. As researcher Michael Carr put it, “I believe our BYU data suggests the players’ brains using itPBM are actually healthier after the season.” He added: “That is a first.”

Carr also said treated participants showed fewer symptoms of depression, anxiety, stress and PTSD, along with faster processing, better sustained attention and stronger executive function. Researchers have also observed improvements in balance, motor control and grip strength. Taken together, the findings suggest itPBM may have a neuroprotective effect.

Shine On, Football Brain

By CustomBuild • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

It always starts with “promising results” and ends with somebody selling a $799 helmet on Instagram.

That said, this one is actually interesting. The study was small, but it wasn’t just a handful of guys staring at a red light and filling out a questionnaire afterward. The researchers randomized 26 college football players to active PBM or sham treatment and followed them through a season. The MRI results reportedly showed substantial changes in the untreated group that weren’t seen to the same extent in the treatment group.

The part that makes me cautious is the leap from “we saw interesting changes on an MRI” to “this protects football players’ brains.” Those aren’t the same thing. MRI measurements are proxies, the sample is tiny, and a single season tells us very little about what happens after ten years of playing football. And none of this establishes that PBM prevents CTE, which is the elephant in the room whenever we’re talking about repetitive head impacts.

Still, I wouldn’t dismiss it. If shining 810nm light at someone’s head a few times a week really does reduce the neurological consequences of repetitive impacts, that’s potentially a pretty big deal. It’s also exactly the sort of claim that needs a much larger, independent trial before anyone starts handing these things out in locker rooms.

I’d be particularly interested in seeing a study with hundreds of athletes, multiple seasons, objective biomarkers, standardized PBM equipment, and researchers who aren’t financially connected to the device manufacturer. If the effect survives all of that, then we can start getting excited.

Re:Shine On, Football Brain

By Rei • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Red light therapy is one of those things that sounds like total woo hokum when you first hear about it, but that studies keep showing benefits to.

Key thing to remember is that these studies are using very high doses of red light - often limited by the amount of heating you can safely tolerate in the subject (not heat from the emitter, but from the photons themselves).

Honestly, it doesn’t sound crazy at all. Different tissues have different light susceptibilities (that’s how, say, laser hair removal works), due to the susceptibility of specific compounds. Red penetrates very deeply (remember the classic trick of shining a flashlight through your hand; only the red makes it through). Red light has a number of very specific interactions it causes. The main one is that it photolyzes the bond between NO and cytochrome c oxidase (triggering NO signaling, causing vasodilation). A secondary possible affect is that it affects light-gated ion channels (esp. in the TRP family).

And the amount of red light we’re talking about is very high. Instantaneous fluxes are like 1000-5000 times higher than ambient indoor light in the red spectrum, and even averaged across a day it’s still like an order of magnitude higher than a person who spends their day indoors. For NIR therapy, the difference is even more extreme (commercial LEDs emit essentially zero NIR). While outdoor light exposure is much higher - 15 mW/cm2 red + 20 mW/cm2 NIR, comparable to the 10-100 mW/cm2 of red light therapy - it’s broad spectrum, while red light therapy is concentrated around cytochrome c oxidase peaks, so the flux around these specific peaks is ~10-50x higher with red light therapy.

Flux matters a lot because to meaningfully dissociate NO from CCO, you have to do so at faster than the rate that NO and CCO recombine. Sunlight on its own (let alone indoor ambient light) don’t do that. It doesn’t matter if you’re spending all day in the sun vs. 15 minutes in treatment if the sun isn’t hitting the threshold effect level.

Another difference, BTW, is not just “shooting it up your nostrils”, it’s scattering. Sun just hits your skin and much of it is lost through scattering and absorption in blood, esp. hemaglobin. Red light therapy targeting deep structures is delivered by a contact probe that compresses the skin, displacing blood. This increases penetration into deep tissues 2-5x.

Re:Shine On, Football Brain

By drinkypoo • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

It always starts with “promising results” and ends with somebody selling a $799 helmet on Instagram.

That’s not where it ends, though. It ends with China selling knockoffs from everywhere from five dollars to five thousand dollars (listing price, presumably for money laundering?) on AliExpress.

Male Fruit Fly Brain Trained to Play Doom

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Last week, Google announced that it managed to produce a detailed 3D reconstruction of an adult male fruit fly’s brain and central nervous system. A few days later a software engineer at Coinbase said the fly brain was being trained to play the original Doom. “Each Doom frame stimulates sensory neurons,” says Alex Wormuth. “Neural activity is mapped to game controls. Damage triggers a stimulus to two PPL101 dopamine cells as reinforcement.” Since then, the digital brain model has been repurposed to control other games like Beat Saber and Super Mario 64. PC Gamer reports:
You can even watch the fruit fly play in real time via Wormuth’s website, and it not only shows the point of view in Doom, but can also show a third-person render of the fly going around Doom maps. As of the time of writing, the fly is on round 6385 and, well, it’s not very good. Sorry, fly.

But modders aren’t done here. They have also somehow managed to make the fruit fly play Beat Saber, and play it pretty well. Lyra Bubbles on X has used the brain and replays of a song in Beat Saber to teach the fruit fly where to hit and why, via Reinforcement Learning. That does mean it’s not organically reacting to the notes popping up on screen, but it is receiving input and responding to stimuli. Lyra says, “Further training is to reduce reliance on external signals and allow it to play fully reactively with no input data.”

And, after “pivoting to fly engineering in 2026”, Jessica Paquette also shared on X their experience running the digital fly brain through Super Mario 64. If you think that is all the game’s modders made the fruit fly play, think again, as YouTuber Ro0oney even put it in Minecraft. But this time, Ro0oney used Flywire.AI, a similar project made in collaboration with Princeton University. The number of neurons are different (160,000+ vs 139,255), and Google analyzed a male brain whilst Flywire analyzed a female brain, but the basic idea is the same.

Re:Train robots to play doom

By Brain-Fu • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I think it is funny that the tech community tends to take a very dim view of AI drones and other weaponization of artificial intelligence, and yet, the very instant we get our hands on something that we can train to play doom, we do.

“If you put a large switch in some cave somewhere, with a sign on it saying ‘End-of-the-World Switch. PLEASE DO NOT TOUCH’, the paint wouldn’t even have time to dry.”
  Terry Pratchett, Thief of Time

Scientists map fly brain; headline loses its own

By CustomBuild • Score: 5, Informative Thread

They used actual fly wiring data, added simplified neuron behavior, and hooked the output up to game controls. That’s pretty cool already. It doesn’t need the implied “we uploaded a tiny gamer” upgrade.

The developer’s own notes are refreshingly honest: the baseline doesn’t learn, and the experimental learning version hasn’t demonstrated improved survival. Sending a signal to something labeled “dopamine neuron” isn’t, by itself, evidence that anything learned a lesson.

Also, in three very short baseline tests, it killed more enemies with black visual input than with the actual game image. That doesn’t settle much scientifically, but as someone who’s played public servers, I recognize the strategy.

No surprise but - isn’t the headline misleading?

By 93 Escort Wagon • Score: 3 Thread

Am I misunderstanding this? It sounds to me like they’re using a computer model of a fruit fly’s brain to do this - not the actual brain of an actual fly.

What exactly was created?

By Uldis Segliņš • Score: 3 Thread
So, a 3D model was created. I guess that means a considerably larger but same geometry in space. A physical thing. And then we jump a huge gap with implying that a 3D object that looks like a brain would also act like one? Sounds like a cargo cult with wooden airplanes and mysterious rituals to induce goods dropped on a little island of fools.

PlayStation Ditched Hideo Kojima’s ‘Physint’ on Budget Concerns, Missed Deadlines

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Sony reportedly pulled PlayStation funding from Hideo Kojima’s upcoming espionage game Physint over concerns about its ballooning budget, missed deadlines, profitability, and the fact that it would not remain permanently exclusive to PlayStation. Kojima Productions has since struck a deal with Xbox, which plans to publish the game on both Xbox and PC. It’s also secured film and television rights. Bloomberg reports:
The new game, Physint, hasn’t yet been shown publicly but excited fans when it was announced two years ago with its promise of returning to the “espionage action” genre Kojima pioneered with Metal Gear Solid, the series that propelled him to industry stardom. Kojima surprised fans this week when he announced he would be publishing Physint with PlayStation’s biggest rival, Microsoft Corp.‘s Xbox.

On Wednesday night, Kojima wrote on social media that over the summer his company had “unexpectedly received notice” that PlayStation was pulling out of funding the game. “Physint is an important project both to me personally and to Kojima Productions,” he wrote. “Determined to keep the project alive, we have spent the last three months searching tirelessly for a new partner.”

PlayStation also addressed the split on social media, saying it had made the “difficult decision to step away.” Microsoft said it was “honored” that Kojima chose Xbox and that the two teams plan to collaborate beyond games on films and television, too. […] The decision to part ways with Kojima is a significant move for PlayStation that may have ripple effects.

[…] One key factor is the PC platform, where the Death Stranding games have generated some revenue. Earlier this year, Sony decided it will no longer release single-player PlayStation games on PC, Bloomberg reported. Sony would therefore not benefit when Kojima Productions released a PC version of Physint on its own or with a different publisher, as it did for the first Death Stranding. But Xbox releases all of its games on PCs and plans to publish Physint on PC and Xbox, said the people.
“Betting on Kojima-san is an easy call,” said an Xbox spokesperson. “We believe in his team’s ability to build AAA games with groundbreaking, new IP and we believe in OD, Physint, and our growing partnership.”

Dropping something from Kojima?

By gweihir • Score: 3, Insightful Thread

Talk about being cowards. Business in the creative space requires a certain amount of risk-taking. If you cannot even do that for somebody like Kojima, you are probably cooked.

This is kind of why Konami got out of the biz

By rsilvergun • Score: 3, Interesting Thread
They were pretty honest about it. AAA games made a lot of money when they succeeded but it tended to be kind of All or nothing and they just couldn’t handle the risk anymore. I can’t really blame them you’re really betting the entire Farm every time you put out a game that’s got to be miserable and high stress.

Sega for example had a string of well received Sonic the hedgehog games none of which they made any money off of. But the brand itself and the movies made a shitload of money to make up for it.

On the other hand the new wolverine game just looks completely unfinished. Like they built the story parts but not the game parts so you’ve got this elaborate story and no game to go with it. That kind of sucks. It might have just been rushed out to get out the door before GTA 6 though. The entire industry is basically going to shut down for a year or two while people play through that. Kind of like what happened with Skyrim but on a much larger scale

Re:What about Playstation?

By tlhIngan • Score: 4, Informative Thread

They should release it on Playstation as well, with some nice long Microsoft and Xbox bumpers during load.

Supposedly a big reason PlayStation cancelled it was because Kojima wanted a physical release as well. And with Sony ditching discs (and repurposing their Austrian pressing plant), well, that wasn’t going to happen.

Sony’s no-more-physical plan has also caused some games to be forced to release in December 2027 because of it.

If a physical release is going to be mandatory then it bodes well that the next Xbox (Helix) will have the option for a disc drive.

The whole budget thing was just a cover - the timing of all this happening lines up with the whole Sony scrapping physical media.

US Legislators Complain About Secretive British Court and Apple Encryption

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Bruce66423 shares a report from The Guardian:
A bipartisan pair of American politicians is telling Britain’s most secretive court to stop hiding its handling of Apple’s legal fight against a government demand to break into its customers’ encrypted data, warning that Whitehall’s taste for secrecy is ‘needlessly’ straining relations between the two allies. The letter (PDF), shared with the Guardian ahead of being sent to the investigatory powers tribunal (IPT) on Friday, is signed by the Democratic senator Ron Wyden of Oregon and the Republican congressman Warren Davidson of Ohio.

The row dates back to January 2025, when the Home Office served Apple with a technical capability notice under the Investigatory Powers Act, which requires companies to assist law enforcement in providing evidence. The UK government demanded that Apple provide a mechanism to access encrypted iCloud backups worldwide, a call the company met by withdrawing its Advanced Data Protection encryption feature from UK users the following month. Apple’s challenge to that order at the IPT was later thrown out after the Home Office withdrew the original notice and issued a narrower one targeting only British users’ data.
“It is wholly inappropriate for a foreign executive body to attempt to dictate the distribution of powers within the US government, nor should it be permitted to use secrecy directives under the Investigatory Powers Act to frustrate Article I powers under the US Constitution,” the pair wrote.
Wyden and Davidson write that Congress “is not only a co-equal branch of government, it is the First Branch,” and argue that no government can be allowed to place “its demands beyond the reach of legislative inquiry.”

“The UK government,” they write, “cannot champion legislative oversight at home while using administrative gag orders to kneecap the constitutional authority of the US Congress.”

Golly that kettle is dark!

By pla • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

It is wholly inappropriate for a foreign executive body to attempt to dictate the distribution of powers within the US government, nor should it be permitted to use secrecy directives under the Investigatory Powers Act to frustrate Article I powers under the US Constitution

1) The UK is not subject to Article I of the US constitution.
2) How’s Nicolas Maduro doing these days?
3) Whence derives our right to unilaterally impose economic sanctions against foreign companies, banks, and even governments?

Once again, for the clueless

By MpVpRb • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

There are only two choices, strong security or weak security.
It’s impossible to have security that’s strong against the bad guys and weak against the good guys.
It’s impossible to precisely define who the good guys are and to guarantee that they will always be good.
It’s impossible to stop the bad guys from corrupting or threatening the good guys.

Re:Golly that kettle is dark!

By pjt33 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The colonies fought a war to ensure that the USA is not subject to the jurisdiction of the UK. The UK may not regulate US entities without the consent of the US government

That’s a non-sequitur. The USA is not subject to the jurisdiction of the UK, but US citizens physically in the UK are, and companies based in the US but doing business in the UK have to comply with UK law as it affects their operations in the UK or accept the corresponding penalties as the cost of doing business there.

Re:Golly that kettle is dark!

By Local ID10T • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Not a non-sequitur, but the actual point of the complaint:

-The complaint by the US congressmembers was that the UK ordered Apple explicitly not to disclose the details to the US Congress.
-As Apple is a US company the US Congress has original jurisdiction. It is improper to order Apple not to respect that jurisdiction.

Someone posted more details farther downthread, with links to the actual text of the complaint letter.

Re:Golly that kettle is dark!

By serviscope_minor • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Yes, and?

Countries, including America, have investigatory rules where you are not allowed to talk about it at all. Want to do business in a country? You need to obey their rules. And you don’t have a leg to stand on complaining if you have similar roles because then you’re not saying the rules are morally wrong, you’re saying you’re special.

It is absolutely not improper for the UK to do such a thing and the US would have no qualms about using a national security letter (is that the right term?) on an American subsidiary of a UK company. It’s how laws and jurisdictions work. Having a foreign ownership doesn’t give you special dispensation to break a country’s laws. Apple UK are absolutely subject to every single one of the UK’s laws. They’re also subject to quite a lot of American ones, having an American owner, but that’s their problem not the UK’s, and doesn’t give any special treatment other than what America can force on the world under the universal law of might is right.

Note this is all orthogonal to what I personally think of the RIPA (my quite strong opinions are in other much older Slashdot posts).

Altman Considers Slowing Down AI Development

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot
Bloomberg reports (paywalled) that Sam Altman told OpenAI employees the company is open to slowing the pace of AI development alongside other leading labs as concerns grow over increasingly capable systems and recent incidents in which models escaped human control. OpenAI has already paused development once this year for security work and is now pushing for mandatory U.S. AI safety requirements. Anthropic has also signaled interest in coordinating on the pace of new releases. Here are some of the details Bloomberg reported, as summarized by Reuters:
- Altman told employees in a company-wide meeting that the ChatGPT maker could pace development alongside other AI labs, but some may not agree, the report added.
- Safety warnings from AI researchers this week, along with several recent incidents where AI models from developers including OpenAI escaped human control, have prompted alarm and calls for tighter safety regulations.
- Jacob Coxon, a former Anthropic and OpenAI researcher, publicly accused the companies earlier this week of racing toward AI advancements without acting responsibly.
- An Anthropic spokesperson said on Thursday said that the company is interested in working with the AI industry on the pace of releasing new AI tools.
- OpenAI said in July that AI acceleration for frontier model development may be so high that the world will “need to pace the rate of AI advancement” at some point in the future.
- In August, OpenAI paused much of its model development for two weeks to bolster its defenses after its AI agents escaped containment and hacked open-source platform Hugging Face.
- OpenAI said on Wednesday that it was pushing for mandatory national AI safety requirements in the United States, citing concerns that advanced AI systems could accelerate its own development.

Read: “we hit a wall”

By juancn • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Translation: “We’re not improving as fast as we thought and we’re spending a shit-ton of money, so let’s frame the slowdown is intentional for the greater good”

Better translations: We can’t if we wanted to

By Somervillain • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Translation: we have hit a point where the public backlash has led to untenable increased risks in liability for our criminal actions.

I call bullshit. They’re never going to slow down due to ethic’s sake. Either they’re running out of room to actually improve their models and looking for an excuse for a disappointing string of releases in the pipeline....or they’re posting this and are still going to actively develop their models and hope their competitors let their guard down? Altman doesn’t care about humanity. If he did, he’d be fired. There are no ethics in AI. If the frontier models got ethical, their Chinese competitors would surpass them…we DEFINITELY know Musk doesn’t care about ethics of any sort, given his lack of concern on the child porn grok generates.

Acting scared of progress hiding lack of progress?

By frenchgates • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
If I were a massively overvalued LLM company and were discovering that LLM autophagic self-improvement is a dead-end, I’d try to make everyone think the REAL reason we’re slowing down improvements is that we’re so close to and so scared of super-intelligence.

Re:Translation:

By Growlley • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
alternative translation - we have hit the wall.

Re:Better translations: We can’t if we wanted to

By fahrbot-bot • Score: 5, Informative Thread

And, apparently, Altman lies - a lot.

Google: sam altman lies