Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. What’s 88-year-old Ridley Scott Doing Now?
  2. With the Snip of a Gene, Scientists Hope To Erase High Cholesterol For Life
  3. Millions of Cars Recalled Over Danger of Bursting Into Flames. But They’re Not EVs.
  4. Chatbot Conversations Can Become Evidence in Court
  5. The Linux Kernel Is Approaching 2,000 CVEs Per Release
  6. ‘Grand Theft Auto 6’ Preview Signals Blockbuster Demand, Analysts Say
  7. As Backlash Grows, More Americans Now Oppose Automated Police License Plate Readers Than Support
  8. Xylitol Linked To Strokes and Heart Attacks, Study Finds
  9. The World’s Busiest Spaceport Is About To Get a Lot Quieter, At Least For Now
  10. Trump Creates a Space Academy and Honors the Artemis Astronauts
  11. Is China Secretly Fueling America’s Data Center Rage?
  12. New York City 911 System Missed 1,700 Calls Due To Software Update
  13. States Can Regulate Prediction Markets As Gambling, Federal Appeals Court Rules
  14. OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, and 100 Other Companies Call For Action To Defend Against Rogue AI
  15. Songs Created By AI Banned From Australia’s Music Charts

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

What’s 88-year-old Ridley Scott Doing Now?

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
The Los Angeles Times first calls Ridley Scott’s newest movie “a postapocalyptic thriller that trades zombies for pandemics and asks whether hope can outlast catastrophe.” But besides The Dog Stars, Scott is also working on an adaptation of Robert Louis Stevenson’s “Treasure Island” starring Hugh Jackman, and is thinking about turning one of his past films into a musical. (“I can’t tell you which one because they’re being difficult.”) The common theme, they suggest, is a director who allows his stories to “speak through evocative, immersive images rather than unnecessary exposition.”
The British director says it’s because he got his start in advertising after attending the Royal College of Art in London. After 1982’s neon-coated sci-fi thriller "Blade Runner,” Scott notably made the iconic Apple Macintosh computer ad “1984,” a memorable Orwellian-themed clip that contained suggestions of the dystopias that would continue to fascinate Scott in his filmmaking. “Advertising in England at that point became a competitive art form,” he says, pointing to the notorious “Adland Five,” a group of directors that included Hugh Hudson, Adrian Lyne, Alan Parker, Scott and his brother Tony. “I’ve got a show reel which is 50 years old which would entertain the s — out you. Hasn’t aged at all. Our visual drive changed the face of how films looked.”

That’s apparent in Scott’s latest, “The Dog Stars” (in theaters Friday), a film about survival after the end of the world. It’s based on Peter Heller’s 2012 novel and set in Colorado 10 years in the future after an aggressive flu has decimated much of the population. Those remaining alive use any means necessary to stay that way, resulting in instability, brutality and, more hopefully, connection… These days, Scott develops movies with his production company, Scott Free, which he founded with his late brother Tony in 1995. Before that he says he struggled to find good scripts. And rarely has someone handed one to him. “I’ve only ever had three films land on my desk,” he says. “One was ‘Alien,’ which I was fifth choice for after Robert Altman.” He makes a face. “Can you imagine offering Robert Altman ‘Alien’? How stupid can you get?”

Another was 2015 space adventure "The Martian,” which Scott says had been sitting on a shelf for two years before it was sent to him. Scott’s grounded, semi-comedic take on Andy Weir’s novel resulted in seven Oscar nominations. The third screenplay to materialize was “The Dog Stars.” “I read it and I was blown away,” Scott says.
Deadline notes that Scott is already re-writing the third prequel to Alien, citing Scott’s comments to French outlet AlloCiné.
“The one that just came out [2024’s Alien: Romulus] was OK. I think it needs some help. So, I’ve gone back in.” Scott continued, “I’ve already got a footprint for the next Alien.... I’m picking up where we left off in Covenant with Micheal Fassbender, who now thinks he’s Ozymandius.” With the sequel bringing back Fassbender’s futuristic AI droid, Scott sees an opportunity to explore the repercussions of artificial intelligence in our current world. “I like the fact that AI has gone off the rails,” said Scott of where the character is at the end of Covenant. “If we go AI, the moment we discover it’s off the rails is too late. It could switch every digital thing off in the world like that. You’d have fucking chaos. It’s that kind of stuff that’s scary.”
Scott tells the Los Angeles Times that the malfunctioning AI character fascinates him, and in the movie will be creating a “brave new world for himself… AIs can go off. And if they do, it’s like a bomb…”
So far, Scott says he hasn’t implemented AI technologies into his filmmaking. He holds up his “Treasure Island” Ridleygrams [hand-drawn storyboards] and shakes them at the camera. “I can compete with an AI without any problem making images,” he says. “But it’s coming, inevitably.”

Scott was not involved in the forthcoming Prime Video series “Blade Runner 2099,” out in November. “I can’t blame my lawyers and my agents at that time, but somehow we let ‘Blade Runner’ go,” he says. “And when you’re not the author of the actual written word, you don’t have a piece.” (He was more involved in Noah Hawley’s recent “Alien: Earth” series, which he calls “pretty damn good....”)

Does that mean he thinks about his legacy as a filmmaker? He does, but not often. “When you think of your legacy, you’re too near the end,” Scott says. “I’m not near the end.” He looks up from his drawings. “I’ve had a riotous time,” he says. He corrects himself: “I’m having a riotous time.”

With the Snip of a Gene, Scientists Hope To Erase High Cholesterol For Life

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
CNN reports that “A one-time snip of a key gene lowered heart-clogging cholesterol by about 50% over an entire year with no adverse effects, scientists have reported.”
The overwhelmingly positive results were found in four people who had taken the highest dose of the experimental treatment during a pilot study published in The New England Journal of Medicine in November 2025. That study was extremely small — only 15 patients with dangerously high cholesterol that did not respond to medication. The research was designed to test the safety of five different doses of a gene-altering infusion delivered by CRISPR-Cas9, a biological scissor which cuts a targeted genetic location to modify or turn a gene on or off. “If you’d asked me 15 years ago if we could have done something like this, I would have thought you were crazy,” senior study author Dr. Steven Nissen, chief academic officer of the Sydell and Arnold Miller Family Heart, Vascular & Thoracic Institute at Cleveland Clinic in Ohio, told CNN previously.

An update on the study, published Friday in NEJM, appears to answer a key question: Does the intervention last? “Is something like this truly a one and done? That was always the question,” said lead study author Dr. Luke Laffin, a preventive cardiologist at Cleveland Clinic’s Heart, Vascular & Thoracic Institute. “This new data is essentially saying that the decreases in LDL cholesterol and triglycerides we saw at 60 days after treatment have lasted over a year,” Laffin said. “In people who took the highest dose, the reduction seems durable and safe....”

If larger clinical trials show similar results, the procedure could be a game changer for young people with severe disease, preventive cardiologist Dr. Ann Marie Navar, an associate professor of cardiology at UT Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas, told CNN previously. “If you’re 20 and you have really high cholesterol, it may make a lot more sense to have a one-time treatment that doesn’t require you to have to take a pill every single day or shot every two weeks for the next 60 years,” said Navar, who was not involved in the study. “The potential for this is just enormous.”
Being born with this mutation naturally “drastically lowers or even eliminates a person’s risk for heart disease,” the article points out. And the study’s senior author adds “now that CRISPR is here, we have the ability to change other people’s genes so they too can have this protection.”

Where do I sign?

By jenningsthecat • Score: 3 Thread

As a heart attack survivor I’d be happy to have this shot. Between that and a strict ketogenic diet I could reverse my atherosclerosis and vastly reduce my chances of both heart attack and stroke.

In case you’re wondering - yes, it really is possible to get rid of arterial plaques. The calcium part of the plaques will always remain, but that’s not the dangerous part of the plaques. The killer is the sacs of pus which are part of the plaques, they’re what become dislodged and cause heart attack and/or stroke. Diet and lifestyle changes can reduce those pus sacs drastically, though it was long believed that once they were present they were permanent.

I also think that the likelihood of dementia goes down when one manages to reduce atherosclerosis, but I’m not certain of that.

Millions of Cars Recalled Over Danger of Bursting Into Flames. But They’re Not EVs.

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
The Washington Post shares this tip for car buyers.

Electric vehicles “are not driving the recent growth in recalls warning that vehicles could erupt into flames at any time, even when parked and turned off.”
A Washington Post analysis of National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) recall notices found that conventional gas and diesel vehicles made up the vast majority of vehicles covered by the “park outside” label since 2021.

Last week, The Post wrote about an alarming surge in these so-called “park outside” recalls… A total of an estimated 3.4 million vehicles currently have outstanding recalls of this kind, according to vehicle history provider CarFax. Safety experts say the surge in “park outside” recalls appears to be caused by other changes to modern gas and electric vehicles, such as the additional technology in everything from transmissions to seat warmers.... [It’s a messy mix of things that “doesn’t lend itself to simple description of what’s happening,” says Sean Kane, president of auto safety-analysis firm Safety Research and Strategies. “But it boils down to growing electronic systems and the number of components.”]

They’re known as “key-off fires,” said Frank Borris, a former NHTSA investigator who now works as a safety consultant. “The engine is off,” he said, “but the circuits are still hot and they stay hot all the time.” Earlier this year, Kia needed to recall 463,000 Tellurides because of the risk that the front power-seat switch could overheat and ignite the seat. That was the second time Kia had issued a recall for that one defect. The first recall, in 2024, didn’t fully address the problem. More than 66,000 Ford Expeditions and Lincoln Navigators from the 2021 model year were recalled due to circuit boards in the battery junction box that could short out. At least 16 fires were blamed on the problem, which often ignited when the vehicles were parked and turned off.

NHTSA has issued 93 “park outside” recalls since 2021, according to a Post analysis. Nearly half — 44 recalls — covered vehicles exclusively with conventional internal-combustion engines, while 38 recalls were just for EVs or hybrids. So the number of campaigns were nearly equally divided between gas and electric or hybrid vehicles. But gas vehicles pull away when comparing the size of the recalls. Gas-only campaigns covered a combined 4.6 million vehicles with “park outside” recalls over the past five years, compared to only about 662,000 vehicles that were EVs or hybrids…

Other countries have provided limited looks at the EV fire issue, such as an United Kingdom government review of data from Norway finding that gas and diesel vehicles had a fire incidence rate that was four times higher than EVs from 2016 to 2021.
Just in 2026, U.S. authorities have announced 17 new “park outside” recalls covering 1.7 million vehicles, according to the article.

Just numbers, or some culture?

By fuzzyfuzzyfungus • Score: 3, Interesting Thread
It could certainly just be a numbers game; tons of ICE vehicles out there; or whether there’s an issue with accumulated cultural assumptions and engineering priorities.

I can at least imagine that there’s a difference in mindset between “this is a 12v lead acid starter battery; it’ll put out a solid few tens of amps for the starter motor assuming it is working correctly; but its energy density is kind of trash and we mostly prefer not to dump additional systems onto it, especially when that exposes them to the slightly gross output of the alternator” and “This battery has been designed to fully provide for all energy requirements of a vehicle; if you displease it it will probably kill you and then burn vigorously for a day or two. A foundational assumption of all systems that need energy is that they’ll be connected back to it in one way or another because there aren’t other energy sources here.”

Not like electric vehicle designers couldn’t/don’t make mistakes, and certainly some of their mistakes burn with the really exciting commitment of a large light metal fire; but the engineering culture around an ICE vehicle seems much more likely to produce a string of individually reasonable, collectively dangerous, “c’mon, it’s just one little 12v system” requests that get bolted onto a fairly antique battery without too much broader thought; while analogous feature demands in a fully electric vehicle will either be judged high energy enough to potentially get brought into the high voltage wiring(which, barring gross negligence across the design is treated like it can and will kill you) or totaled in to some low voltage system budget that will be handled by a DC-DC converter designed with actual care because going from 600v to 12v isn’t something you do as casually as just slapping another 12v requirement in parallel with the other stuff on the 12v battery and calling it good.

Re:Just numbers, or some culture?

By AmiMoJo • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

The 12V batteries in EVs are much smaller because they don’t need to provide cranking amps. They are just there to run the 12V systems, and are topped by by a DC-DC converter from the traction battery.

Of course they can often still provide quite a bit of current for things like heating/heated seats/window defog.

The traction battery is only connected to the DC-DC converter, the charger, and the motors. And there are cut-off for all of them. The motors aren’t connected when you are parked, and the charger is only connected when charging/doing vehicle to load.

The switch thing sounds more like the switch gets stuck engaged and doesn’t cut out at the limit of the seat’s movement, causing the motor to overheat. But generally speaking EVs catch fire less than fossils. There is no hot engine full of flammable liquid and explosions, for a start. When you park over leaves, there is nothing hot enough to ignite them on the underside of the car. Nothing needs active cooling to avoid catching fire - the traction battery cooling is to make it last longer and charge faster, if it fails it’s not going to ignite and the BMS will limit power when it gets too warm.

Chatbot Conversations Can Become Evidence in Court

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
The Washington Post looks “a growing number of Americans who have had their private conversations with AI chatbots made public in court,” calling the chatbots “custodians of a fast-growing trove of intimate data that can be sought by law enforcement, or companies or other opponents in civil litigation.”
A Washington Post review of public records and local news stories found that chatbot logs were cited in 12 court cases over the past two years. It’s hard to know how often chatbot material is drawn into investigations and legal proceedings more broadly, because police, and parties in civil cases, don’t have to present in court all the evidence they obtain… In some cases, AI companies have reported people on their platforms to the FBI, leading to prosecutions and at least one conviction… OpenAI has said the company uses software to scan conversations for signs of dangerous behavior and flag them to human reviewers.

If a reviewer determines a chat indicates “an imminent and credible risk of harm to others,” they report the user to law enforcement, the company said in an April blog post. A spokesperson for OpenAI declined to disclose how many times the company had reported users to police.... Data released by OpenAI shows requests by government agencies and law enforcement for user data growing rapidly. In the second half of 2025, the company disclosed data from more than 80 accounts, an increase of more than four times as many over the same period the year before…

When police ask someone to open their phone during questioning or after an arrest, they often do so, allowing officers to scroll through the apps they use, [according to Michael Price, the litigation director for the Fourth Amendment Center at the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers]… In general, the Fourth Amendment, which protects people against unreasonable searches and seizures of their property, provides the right to refuse a search of the contents of their phone unless police have a warrant. “The short answer is that most people consent,” Price said. “They shouldn’t, but they do…”

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has argued that conversations with chatbots should receive special legal protections, similar to conversations between clients and their attorneys.
Special legal protections aren’t recognized by courts today, the article poitns out. A financial executive who became the subject of a federal criminal investigation for fraud asked Claude about potential defense strategies, then asked a judge to disallow the conversations from the prosecution’s case, according to the article. “But the judge said that protections for conversations between clients and their attorneys did not apply: Claude is not a lawyer, and the executive’s attorneys did not ask him to talk to the chatbot.”

The article includes quotes from three ChatGPT conversations that later turned up in court proceedings:

“As AI becomes a bigger part of everyday life, its use as evidence and in trials is likely to become more prevalent,” the article points out — especially with the growing popularity of agents that take actions for users.


Seriously, Sam?

By Brain-Fu • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Saying that conversations with a chatbot should receive the same legal protections as conversations with a lawyer is beyond ridiculous. None of the important reasons why conversations with a lawyer get such protections apply.

Yes, it’s true that some people really open up to chat bots. That still doesn’t justify such protections. People just should know better than to have dangerous conversations with computer programs hosted on some one else’s machine! People who really need people to talk to should still abstain from confessing their crimes to chatbots.

Everything else we do must be done cautiously. Alcohol use doesn’t come with special legal protections; it’s on us to drink responsibly. Gun use doesn’t come with special legal protections it’s on us to manage them responsibly. Conversations with our employers, family members, friends, lovers, etc., don’t come with special legal protections; it’s on us to keep our mouths shut about certain topics. Why in the world would chatbot use be any different? Seriously, this is nonsense.

People with money can buy a beefy machine and host a chatbot model on it locally. Everyone else can just develop some AI street smarts. Or go to jail after they confess crimes to a chatbot.

Several things lumped together

By larryjoe • Score: 3 Thread

A chatbot conversation that police can legally see is just as admissible in court as a private journal entry on a desk in one’s home that police can legally see. That seems obvious. However, there are separate issues involved. Was the evidence gathered legally? Was there a legal warrant or request? Was there duress? Also, using a chatbot conversation in court is far different than constant review to determine if police or supervisors should be notified.

The Linux Kernel Is Approaching 2,000 CVEs Per Release

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Phoronix reports on Greg Kroah-Hartman’s recent slide from his upcoming talk in Paris at Kernel Recipes 2026 (September 21 to 23):
With the proliferation of AI/LLM models analyzing the Linux kernel’s vast codebase, there has been a surge in the number of CVEs per kernel release. After typically being around 500 CVEs fixed per release, we are now approaching 2,000 CVEs fixed per release and perhaps will break that threshold for Linux 7.3… Fortunately, most often they end up being lower priority vulnerabilities and often within old/obscure driver code, so the impact is often minimal.

This is the correct use for AI

By Valgrus Thunderaxe • Score: 3 Thread
vs. weaponizing it to spy on people.

Worth keeping in mind

By sjames • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Many CVE’s are somewhat junk of the form if you already have 3 ways to legitimately become root, you can use this 4th way too. OR (samn close to) OMG!!! Denial of Service attack, you can turn off the power and nobody can access the server!!! RED ALERT!!!

Others are real and need to be addressed, but the junk does more harm than good by distracting from real issues.

‘Grand Theft Auto 6’ Preview Signals Blockbuster Demand, Analysts Say

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Rockstar Games has released a 26-minute “extended look" at Grand Theft Auto VI, due for release November 19th. After one day the video had nearly 10 million views on YouTube, and when Netflix streamed the footage, “some viewers had to refresh the page after receiving error messages, indicating high usage levels,” reports CNBC:
“Some members briefly experienced an issue accessing Netflix, but we quickly recovered,” the company told CNBC. Game streaming platform Twitch, where many viewers were posting their reactions, also experienced bandwidth issues when the trailer was released, according to analysts at Wells Fargo.
CNBC notes predictions the game could become one of the most profitable entertainment products of all time, while the Washington Post predicting it’s “about to be the biggest pop media event of the year, if not the decade.”
The data backs this up. The latest evidence arrived Thursday, when Netflix viewership surged for the long-awaited first look at gameplay footage, according to data from market intelligence firm Sensor Tower. The firm estimates “GTA VI” has already received about 4.6 million preorders. Box office blockbusters like “The Odyssey” take weeks to hit $1 billion. “GTA V” famously did it in three days. Analyst firm Newzoo projects the new game could generate between $3.3 billion and $5.2 billion by the end of its launch week in November…

The influence of the series, created by Rockstar Games, extends beyond sales records. In 2025, “GTA V” accumulated 1.89 billion hours watched despite being a 12-year-old title, according to Stream Hatchet. Much of those hours are spent watching people role-play in “GTA Online,” particularly through role-play servers managed by studio Cfx.re, which was acquired by Rockstar in 2023. By 2024, the studio said more than 20 million players used its platforms. GTA role-play involves players pretending to be cops, robbers, hapless retail workers or any functioning member of society within the online game… The game can lift up music sales and streams. Tom Petty’s 1989 song “Love is a Long Road” saw stream numbers increased by nearly 37,000 percent on Spotify after it was the soundtrack to the debut “GTA VI” trailer in 2023, according to Universal Music Publishing Group.
Christopher Dring, editor-in-chief and co-founder of analysis firm The Game Business, told CNBC’s “Squawk Box Europe” that GTA 5 is still in the top five bestselling video games every year, despite being released 13 years ago, reports CNBC:
The response to Thursday’s gameplay debut indicated that leaks of the content in advance would not impact the launch commercially, he continued. Rockstar Games, which makes the GTA franchise, had called the leaks “heartbreaking....”

The GTA 6 preview follows a mixed reaction from players to the news that GTA 6 would only be released as a digital download, with no physical disc. The alleged source of the leaked content has claimed the leaks were a protest over Rockstar’s release strategy, and Sony’s plan to end to new PlayStation disc production in 2028. Speaking on the last earnings call on Aug. 7, Take-Two CEO Strauss Zelnick said discs did not make sense to the consumer, adding that its business was “well over 90% digitally distributed.” Data from Circana shows the sale of physical game discs in the U.S. has fallen to its lowest level on record, with spending at $85 million.

Let me guess

By Hentes • Score: 3 Thread

Let me guess, it’s exactly the same as every GTA game since GTA3.

As Backlash Grows, More Americans Now Oppose Automated Police License Plate Readers Than Support

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
A new survey on police license plate cameras found that “more Americans oppose these surveillance cameras than support them,” reports TechCrunch:
According to a new YouGov survey of 20,000 people across the U.S. that was shared exclusively with The Washington Post, 46% of respondents opposed the company’s surveillance cameras in their communities, while 38% supported them. This is a reversal from last year, when the majority of survey respondents said they were in favor… The survey also reported that more respondents said the surveillance would not make them feel any safer.
TechCrunch reports that Flock CEO Garrett "faces a growing public outcry around concerns that Flock’s surveillance cameras, drones, and license plate recognition technology could be misused.” Responding to reports of police abusing Flock’s system, Langley told CBS News " I don’t think that Flock created police abuse. I think we’re the first company to ever shine a light on it and build the tools to find it.”

But Futurism notes that “a grand jury in Ohio declined to bring felony charges against a man accused of destroying a Flock camera earlier this month — perhaps the clearest sign yet of the country’s overwhelming hatred for the surveillance gadgets.” And Newsweek documents more of the backlash:
Flock Chief Executive Garrett Langley recently became the subject of a doxxing campaign after his home address was circulated online by opponents of the company’s technology, underscoring how deeply divisive the issue has become.
TechCrunch reports Flock’s CEO is now calling for new laws — at the state level — regulating not Flock’s cameras but the police officers who use them:
Langley has said that state regulators should “pass bills that make [the illegal use of Flock data] a criminal offense.” And during his Fox News interview, he pointed to the changes the company has already made, while also saying, “Today, it is too often that in Flock and in other technologies, there’s no regulation. There’s no accountability, and we think that’s wrong.”
But Flock has its supporters. One local police department used a 3D printer to create a fake “decoy” camera, then monitored it for five days until they arrested a Florida man for knocking it down. 404 Media suggests that because the man told officers he believed it was a camera worth between $1,000 and $5,000, he was charged with three felonies including “grand theft” and criminal mischief of property damage worth over $1,000, plus property crimes against computer equipment supplies.

Ironically, days earlier the City Council was already considering a resolution to end their city’s use of Flock cameras altogether…

Shocked it was ever that high

By pla • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Sorry, 38% of people support them, or merely don’t hate them passionately enough to commit several felonies destroying them on sight? I find it hard to believe anyone on the correct side of the thin blue line actually wants this garbage.

And that’s not even touching on the blatant fourth amendment violation going on, which I don’t expect Joe Average to even recognize much less care about. Who wants Uncle Sam or his proxies watching their every move?

This is a fight that cannot be won

By timholman • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Unless the opponents of LPR cameras can figure out how to outlaw either computers or security cameras, this is a doomed cause. An LPR camera is literally nothing but a high quality camera connected to a computer network, with image recognition software being run on the video stream.

I’ve been on this site long enough to remember how Slashdot users mocked the efforts of media companies to stop file sharing, pointing out that computers and computer networking couldn’t be outlawed. But now, somehow, we’re supposed to outlaw character recognition of license plates in the AI age?

Efforts would be far better spent on changing laws to punish misuse of LPR cameras, and codify the parameters of their use. They are useful tools for solving crimes and recovering stolen vehicles, and any police force that uses them can tell you that.

If people truly think that having their license plates being seen in public is a violation of their 4th Amendment rights, then perhaps they should petition their state legislatures to eliminate license plates altogether. Otherwise, what is the purpose of having them?

Re:Shocked it was ever that high

By bobby • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

I absolutely agree with you, and also oppose these cameras. We need to get this word out more; I think most citizens will oppose them when they realize what’s going on.

In my area at least, the cameras are aimed right at our faces- facial recognition, which I’m even more against.

It sure seems like a 4th Amendment violation, and IIRC a recent court (SCOTUS?) ruling ruled against this mass surveillance.

We citizens need a permit to plant a bush on our own property in some areas. Did Flock et al get permits? Was the public duly notified about the cameras, giving us a fair chance to oppose the cameras before they have been installed?

Sadly this country (as with others) is devolving into an “us against them” mess.

Re:This is a fight that cannot be won

By allo • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Privacy laws are a thing. You can definitely outlaw security cameras filming public places. You only need politicians to want that.

Original Argument Flawed

By gurps_npc • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

The original argument for these cameras was:

You are in public, it is legal for humans to physically observe you, therefore it is legal for the cops to observe you, therefore it is legal for them to use cameras to observe you.

The problem is that quantity changes things. It may be legal for a person standing in public to observe you, but for them to follow you all day is called STALKING. That is not legal.

For a cop to follow you all day, every day of your life, that is Harassament. They would need a court order to do that, or be subject to a court order preventing it.

Flock and other similar cameras do not just take pictures, they have software now to track you everywhere you go in the US (excluding Alaska) using over 120,000 cameras. They can follow you from one camera to another.

This is stalking, not merely observing.

Xylitol Linked To Strokes and Heart Attacks, Study Finds

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Guardian:
A common sweetener used in products such as chewing gum, toothpaste, jam, yoghurts and ice-cream has been linked to an increased risk of strokes, heart attacks and death. Xylitol is a sugar alcohol present in some natural foods in very low amounts. It is also added — often in amounts 1,000 times higher — to artificially sweeten foods, beverages and oral care products. Despite its growing use, the long-term health impacts of xylitol have never been widely studied.

In the largest study of its kind, researchers found high blood levels of xylitol were associated with an increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events. The findings were presented in Munich at the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) annual congress, the world’s largest heart conference. Researchers looked at 17,710 people and compared the 25% with the highest levels of xylitol in their blood against the 25% with the lowest. Those who had the highest amount were 57% more likely to die or suffer a heart attack or stroke, than those with the least, within six years. Even after 30 years, they were still 18% more likely to have suffered one of these cardiac events.

Taken with data from the middle quartiles, the results from both cohorts suggested a dose-dependent relationship: the higher the xylitol blood levels, the higher the cardiovascular event rate. Furthermore, the researchers showed that there was consistent increase in cardiovascular events with xylitol irrespective of baseline characteristics, such as age and sex. The researchers also highlighted that the association was independent of underlying factors such as body mass index, hypertension, diabetes and lipid levels, which might predispose people to low-calorie products.

Just do without “sweet”

By gweihir • Score: 4, Informative Thread

It takes a bit of getting used to it, but all forms of sugar and sweeteners are problematic. And they are often used to cover product defects like low-quality ingredients on top of that, making things even worse.

Re:Call me crazy if you must

By Brain-Fu • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Straight from the article:

The researchers also highlighted that the association was independent of underlying factors such as body mass index, hypertension, diabetes and lipid levels, which might predispose people to low-calorie products.

The World’s Busiest Spaceport Is About To Get a Lot Quieter, At Least For Now

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
SpaceX is significantly reducing Falcon 9 launches from Florida this year, ending the Space Coast’s decade-long run as the world’s busiest spaceport as more missions shift to Vandenberg Space Force Base in California. The slowdown is expected to continue until Starship begins flying regularly from Florida. Longtime Slashdot reader schwit1 shares a report from Ars Technica:
A Falcon 9 launch early Tuesday was the last planned Starlink mission from Cape Canaveral until SpaceX begins flying Starship missions from Florida, according to Kiko Dontchev, the company’s vice president of launch. For at least the rest of the year, and maybe longer, this means the launch rate at the Florida spaceport will drop from eight or nine per month to perhaps two per month.

It wasn’t long ago when two launches per month was the norm, an indication of just how quickly SpaceX’s launch cadence has grown. Cape Canaveral and Kennedy Space Center sit on adjoining property and share the same range on Florida’s east coast, so it is worth considering them a single spaceport. The last time the Florida spaceport did not lead the world in space launches was in 2015.

“From here on, Starlink missions out of Florida will fly on Starship,” Dontchev wrote on X. “The West Coast team will continue regularly launching Starlink from Vandenberg.”
“Yep, that’ll be louder — but everybody knows the real action will be in Louisiana, starting in 2029 or so,” writes schwit1. SpaceX on Tuesday announced plans to spend up to $100 billion building a new Starship launch facility in Vermilion Parish, Louisiana, which the state says could eventually “support thousands of launches annually.”

Further reading: Musk’s other unstated reasons for shutting down Falcon 9 in Florida (Behind The Black)

“Further Reading” is hilarious

By Rei • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Further reading: Musk’s other unstated reasons for shutting down Falcon 9 in Florida (Behind The Black)

TL/DR, the author thinks that SpaceX shutting down Falcon 9 launches from Florida was secretly a magnanimous gesture by a charitable Elon Musk to boost the competition:

I therefore honestly believe that SpaceX’s decision was not entirely based on its own internal needs. Those needs certainly were the main motive, but based on Elon Musk’s passionate dream of making the human race multi-planetary, as well as his repeated willingness to help his competitors when they needed SpaceX to launch their satellites, I believe he recognized that SpaceX’s dominance could be hurting the rest of the rocket industry, and that the instant it made business sense to clear the field for these competitors, he was quite willing to do so.

LOL.

Re:So What’s the Benefit?

By ceoyoyo • Score: 4, Informative Thread

You either misunderstand which way the Earth rotates or what effect that has on rocket launches. California is limited to retrograde orbits, which nobody uses except the Israelis because they have no choice, and polar orbits.

Trump Creates a Space Academy and Honors the Artemis Astronauts

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
President Trump awarded the four-member Artemis II crew the Congressional Space Medal of Honor and signed an executive order directing the creation of a new U.S. Space Academy. The proposed academy would train engineers, scientists, technicians, operators, and astronauts for NASA, the Space Force, and the commercial space industry. Houston Public Media reports:
The Artemis II crew — NASA’s Reid Wiseman, Victor Glover, Christina Koch, and the Canadian Space Agency’s Jeremy Hansen — retraced history as they flew around the moon and back in April, the first time humans have been in lunar territory since the 1970s. He had previously hosted the crew members at the White House following their mission and called them during the mission while the crew was tens of thousands of miles away. “The one thing that really sticks out to us [from that call] is you said how proud you are and how proud our nation is for the job that we’ve just accomplished,” Wiseman said during Friday’s ceremony. “And for us, that is what we set out to do. We wanted to inspire this nation to learn.”

During the ceremony, Trump also signed an executive order to create the “United States Space Academy.” Under the order, a Presidential Commission on the U.S. Space Academy has 120 days to create a report with guidelines for the U.S. Space Academy. The Commission will include NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman as its Chair, as well as other NASA and space officials. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, Trump’s Chief of Staff Susie Wiles, and Michael Kratsios, assistant to the president for science and technology. In effect, it allows the Trump Administration to build the U.S. Space Academy to its liking. “It will serve both the United States Space Force as well as NASA and the civilian spaceflight industry,” Trump said. “And it will attract, train, graduate the very best that our nation and our nation really has to offer.”
As for where the academy will be located, Trump said he was “going to be choosing a location very shortly.”

Re:In a small change,

By Zocalo • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Joking aside, there’s a much more subtle change too. Look at the quoted wording from the astronauts: "*our* nation”, “inspire *this* nation”. Even at the height of the US-Soviet cold war it was still “for *all* mankind”.

I get Trump’s order is very much aimed at the NASA and the US (and probably getting his name onto it somehow), so can give that a pass, but the astronauts had an opportunity to rise above all that partisanship and slip in a message of much needed global unity, yet failed to do so. There are precious few institutions left in the world that can at least try and claim to be at least somewhat above / outside the direct influence of politics, and it looks like we’re about to lose another one. Quite possibly for good once the ISS is finally decommissioned.

Not possible

By Baron_Yam • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

You can’t actively tear down academia and scientific institutions and simultaneously advance in the space sector. You can’t burn the economy to the ground and launch a lunar mission.

Space is difficult, and space is expensive. You need smart, educated, driven people and enough economic productivity to support them.

On the other hand, if you’re trying to steal some of the glory of an existing institution without worrying whether it will even be able to launch a firework a decade from now without a fatal accident on the launch pad… yeah, go ahead. “Trump Science Academy” it is.

Re:Not possible

By gweihir • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Yes, in the real world that is a hard fact. But the MAGAs and evangelicals (which are apparently mostly the same people) are not living in the real world. They think they can be the best at everything and at the same time ignore Science where it is inconvenient such as telling them they are dead wrong on things. I mean, they even things utterly dumb things like that tariffs are paid by the exporter, a thing were a 30 second web-search and the ability to read clears things up completely.

Hence they will continue to try the impossible, because they lack the mental skills to see it is impossible. Think of the COVID deniers that kept denying right up to the moment it killed them. That is pretty mich the model these defectives are using to deal with reality.

Now, the challenge for the rest of the country is to keep these about 33% utterly deranged people under control. That means the rest has to be united in what they want. Some small things are happening like farmers finding out that voting to have their harvest helpers deported and have their primary source of fertilizer attacked in a trade war are maybe a bit of a problem and that maybe they actually need to think before they vote. But these effects may not be enough. The alternative to keeping the cult out of power is total decline into irrelevancy and poverty.

On the plus side, Europe, Canada, Australia and some others welcome well-educated, smart and capable immigrants from the US disaster area. Others need not apply, sorry.

Re: deficit?

By ArchieBunker • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Name something that he did that has improved your life or the country?

Are grocery prices cheaper?
Is the cost of living lower?
Is gasoline cheaper?
Are your taxes lower?
Did your wages increase?
Did your taxes decrease?
Are your utility bills cheaper?
Do you have health insurance?
If you have insurance did the costs decrease?

Re: deficit?

By ArchieBunker • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

And there it is in a nutshell. You’re huddled around a burning trash can for warmth while muttering “at least the libs are suffering too”.

Is China Secretly Fueling America’s Data Center Rage?

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
alternative_right shares a report from Axios:
Roughly 200 accounts from a suspected Chinese bot farm have quietly tried to influence Americans to oppose AI data centers on social media, X said Thursday night. The X Safety team probed suspected Chinese accounts involved in influence operations and identified 200,000 accounts, including 200 accounts “posting in a manner that could manipulate a legitimate debate about American AI and energy policy,” the team said in a tweet.

The posts included content on how AI strains the electricity grid and increases utility prices and “cartoons that depicted data-center operators enriching themselves at the public’s expense.” It’s unclear what, if any, action X will take to suspend or delete accounts from the bot farm.
One of the reports mentioned in the article estimates that opposition campaigns have delayed or obstructed roughly $45.8 billion in data center projects in Virginia alone.

Jim Prosser, a former Twitter communications executive, pushed back on Silicon Valley claims that opposition to data centers is a “Chinese psyop,” arguing that Big Tech is using the label to dismiss legitimate local concerns. “If you can get both Greg Abbott and Kathy Hochul agreeing on something, it’s probably not a Chinese psyop,” he told Axios.

Prosser said the industry needs to spend more time listening to affected communities rather than dismissing them from afar: “If you’re a [venture capitalist] in Atherton or Menlo Park opining about how somebody in Ohio should feel, and you’ve never been to Ohio, that’s a problem.”

Doing the right thing for the wrong reason.

By engineer37 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Sometimes you can do the right thing for the wrong reason. Datacenters are misguided. Soon enough models and hardware will be good enough that everyone will be able to run their own local AI at home. It’s just like computers back in the 60s. It’s not going to stay on server farms forever. The future is personal AI just like the future was personal computers, and not even at the prices Nvidia is talking about. Normal computers will be able to run frontier models. When that happens, data centers are going to be worthless. They’ll be trillion dollar investment failures, built for a future that doesn’t exist.

And that’s the optimistic take! What happens if the AI bubble bursts and this all goes south? Then all those data centers are worse than worthless. All that land, money and water they used will be totally wasted, and we’re not talking an insignificant amount.

Having skepticism about the future of AI is a good thing, even if it has a future. It’s not healthy to be building these trillion dollar projects based on wild speculation about a future that may never happen even in an optimistic scenario. If this all goes south, everyone who didn’t build a datacenter is going to be better off than anyone who did.

So sure, let China go crazy poisoning their land and water with bad investments in obsolete data centers, while we proceed with a little more caution and sanity. I don’t know about you, but that seems healthy to me. One advantage of living in a free and open society is you can express skepticism of bad ideas.

DC noise and pollution doesn’t need China

By sinkskinkshrieks • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Neighbors already know DCs with unpermitted jet engine gas generators wreck their property values, pollute the air with CO2, CO, NOx, and formaldehyde, and bring light and noise pollution too. Who wouldn’t want that in their literal backyard? Saying “It’s China” is trying to trivialize and gaslight everyone that it’s not happening by denying reality and scapegoating another group.

Re:Possibly

By phantomfive • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
The point of free speech is that it doesn’t matter where the idea came from, it’s an open market of ideas.

If you think that energy guzzling, noisy, water draining data centers are a good thing, you are welcome to make that argument.

Doesn’t matter, obsolete designs

By LostMyBeaver • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
The absolute best data centers today should be written into history as a dark dark stain on the progression of humanity. It is a sign that no matter how stupid we have been up until now, we managed to find that hole has no bottom.

Consider this… The reason we need data centers that massive today is because the tech isn’t ready.

NVidia B300 filled racks using 100kw each are barely capable of running modern frontier models. Even if we designed more powerful chips that could do the job, there isn’t enough silicon wafers produced in the world to do the job. Even the most amazing semiconductor technologies on earth are not good enough. Consider that even if we could build 1TB HBM4 NPUs, the time it would take to generate a token on a transformer that large would be slow.

What we know

Transformers will leave the data center between 2030-2032 as it will never make sense to run transformer inference in racks. It’s at least 1000x less green than local inference.

Intel, AMD, NVidia, Apple and every RISC-V/ARM chip supplier on earth is 100% focused on making local inference the thing.

We will soon stop training massive models that start becoming obsolete the moment the last parameter is fed. Even now, Qwen 3.8 27b is good enough for a year at least (first model to do this).

For LLMs, we’ll just stop wasting cycles on huge networks and will focus more on stronger harnesses attached to better data sources.

Cloud AI will be more about acting as data providers. Models will become reasoning engines, the “smarts” will come from things like vector databases.

Vector databases will use kilowatts, not megawatts. Data storage will be much smaller.

Things like Intel’s dead Optane product will become the future of datacenters. Google Search, Microsoft Bing, maybe Baidu are the best positioned companies for what comes next and they don’t need 100KW per rack to deliver. If I were to enter this segment, I would pair a customized KLV object query engine onto a 1024 bit wide ecc memory bus and connect it with low cost networking (think Intel’s Ethernet fabric tech). Then add a super capacitor to flush to flash on power loss… Or just hope Optane comes back. Superfast, massive, token based vector databases are the future of cloud LLM

What’s next. In 3-5 years, every single rack in every single AI data center is trash

This is fact.

Even now H100 racks should be heading to scrap.

The chips are slow, they use old heat spreader tech, they get almost no performance per watt compared to B300. They are much harder to cool. They have so little VRAM it takes piles of them to run newer models. PCIe data center GPUs were always irresponsible purchases. SXM GPUs only run on special systems Noone but high end data centers can even run.

Consider that every single B300 or older equipped rack on earth is landfill in 3-5 years.

By then, the world will have overprovisioned RAM, we’ll have moved 2-3 generations of cooling forward, we’ll have designed denser racks, started employing all the awesome tech China built to work around lack of EUV… No really, Korean companies are already licensing CXMT tech for wafer stacking. We will have moved to lower fresh water depen....

You know what? It is going to just be cheaper to bankrupt the shell corporations who own the current data centers than to upgrade them to new tech. Besides, the environmental issues will be such a mess. Imagine trying to dispose of that much fr4 epoxy without causing environmental disasters? It’s probably at least as much epoxy as the total mass of the twin towers.

I can keep ranting but I promise this, there isn’t a single piece of tech in the most modern AI data center on earth that is worth using in 5 years… Not even the racks. It’s all garbage.

Re: No

By Growlley • Score: 5, Funny Thread
“America is the only country that went from barbarism to decadence without civilization in between,” Oscar Wilde.

New York City 911 System Missed 1,700 Calls Due To Software Update

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Longtime Slashdot reader belmolis writes:
Part of New York City’s 911 emergency system was offline from about 3:13 a.m. to 10 a.m. on August 18th due to a software update, according to Medical Daily. Of 5,659 calls to the Bronx call center during that period, about 1,700 calls connected but could not be heard by emergency operators. Some were rerouted to other call centers, but an estimated 400 human callers never got through. The potentially serious consequences of delayed response to emergencies are not yet known. The city did not notify the public and only released information when journalists inquired. How buggy software came to be installed on a running system is not yet known.
The early-morning software update was pushed by Motorola, though exactly what it changed or why it caused the failure remains unknown. The city is still investigating whether the update was adequately tested and whether the same software release was deployed elsewhere.

No longer 911

By PPH • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Now its 0118999881999119725
-3

A and B systems

By davidwr • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Back in the last quarter of the 20th century, many POTS telephone switches had an A side and a B side.

During software upgrades - and yes those were a thing - they would route all new calls to the A side and wait until the last call on the B side ended before they would take the B side down for the upgrade.

Then they would do some testing before bringing up the B side.

Only after they were confident that the B side was working would they upgrade the A side.

This worked in part because they could schedule upgrades when the load was low enough to be handled only by half of the switch’s capacity.

I used to work in the industry

By evslin • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Not at Motorola, but another company in the space.

Software upgrades were extremely methodical in nature. The change control calls had dozens of people on them, and the upgrade document was hundreds of pages long. The ops team (which was not the dev team) rehearsed the upgrade in lower environments for weeks before doing it for real. I was on upgrade calls mostly just as a security blanket in case developer intervention was required.

I feel bad for the folks who have to deal with the FCC paperwork. You never wanted to get invited to one of those calls, it was like having the Inquisition show up at your doorstep.

> How buggy software came to be installed on a running system is not yet known.

It may not even have been the software. Well, it might have been, but it might also not have been. I got paged out at 2am one time because the domain controller, which I do not own, rotated all the passwords for the managed service accounts, which I do not control, and the SQL database, which I do not manage, suddenly lost its shit and wouldn’t let any apps log in. It fixed itself in about 15 minutes, but the state noticed, and we were doing paperwork for about a week after that.

Re: 1K crises per hour?

By taustin • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Still doesn’t seem out of line, especially given the things people call 911 over.

Re:Digital Electronics…greatly missed

By sinkskinkshrieks • Score: 4, Funny Thread
Vibe coders today don’t know what HA even is.

States Can Regulate Prediction Markets As Gambling, Federal Appeals Court Rules

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
A federal appeals court has ruled that states can regulate prediction markets like Kalshi as gambling, handing state regulators their biggest legal victory yet against the booming industry. “There are still related lawsuits pending across the country, and legal experts believe the matter will ultimately be settled by the Supreme Court,” reports CNN. “But Friday’s ruling from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals is the largest courtroom victory to date for the states as they seek to regulate prediction sites.” CNN reports:
The 3-0 ruling came from a panel of three Trump-appointed judges. The case originated from Nevada, where regulators tried to shut down the Kalshi prediction site. […] “The substance of the sports event contracts offered on Kalshi’s (exchange) is sports gambling, regardless of whether Kalshi calls them swaps,” the appeals panel wrote Friday, adding that “Kalshi’s attempts to distinguish its sports event contracts from sportsbooks betting are unpersuasive.” The judges also said it was “disingenuous” for Kalshi to argue in court that its products weren’t sports-betting when it previously used that phrasing in marketing materials.
Kalshi spokeswoman Dani Lever said in a statement: “Despite the Ninth Circuit’s opinion, we still believe the CFTC regulations as written do not prohibit sports contracts, and in any event, the CFTC is working to clarify those regulations. We will be seeking further review.”
“It’s the first ruling against Kalshi at the appellate level, and the opinion seemed to be pretty brutal for the company,” said Dustin Gouker, an independent journalist who covers the prediction industry. “This gets us one step closer to an almost inevitable Supreme Court case on the legality of sports event contracts.”

As expected

By Local ID10T • Score: 3 Thread

Kalshi spokeswoman Dani Lever said in a statement: “Despite the Ninth Circuit’s opinion, we still believe the CFTC regulations as written do not prohibit sports contracts, and in any event, the CFTC is working to clarify those regulations. We will be seeking further review.”

There is nothing unusual about states having regulations in addition to federal regulations.

Alcohol is federally regulated. It is also subject to state and local regulation.

Supreme Court will overturn it

By rsilvergun • Score: 4, Informative Thread
Six of nine judges are completely on the take. Google the phrase luxury motor Coach sometime.

It should be a bigger deal that the Chief Justice of the supreme Court is a corrupt sellout but well here we are. Half the country is quaking in their boots because 34 trans girls might play sports and one of the most powerful men on the planet is openly taking bribes and they shrug their shoulders.

I don’t know how a species like that survives the next 50 years let alone the next millennia.

Re:As expected

By rsilvergun • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
Yeah but Federal regulations override state regulations. Supremacy clause which is what they’re relying on. They have control of the supreme Court thanks to decades of bribes and so here we are..

Even if you’re not stupid enough to gamble because you know you have to lose because of course you do you’re going to be negatively affected by this because tens of millions of young men will gamble with money they don’t have to lose and that will increase crime and cause a ton of other problems.

This is a classic chesterton’s fence where you don’t take the fence down without understanding why the fuck it was put up. Gambling is highly addictive so it needs to be carefully regulated. Criminalizing it isn’t a good idea either keeping it locked away to one state and then heavily regulating it in that state more or less seem to be working. And we just pissed that all away.

Re:As expected

By Waffle Iron • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Alcohol is federally regulated. It is also subject to state and local regulation.

While your general argument has merit, alcohol is a bad example because states’ control over that particular substance is explicitly granted in the constitutional amendment that repealed prohibition.

The “No Shit Sherlock” Revelation.

By geekmux • Score: 3 Thread

Oh, so after addicting an obscene amount of society to an obvious legalized gambling market spread far and wide online with drug-dealer level marketing giving away a few spins for free with pretty pop-up ads on the pediatric channel..we finally speculated that was in fact..gambling.

Show me the kissing junkie one who’s offended about wiping the lipstick off the pig and finding a pig, and I’ll show you a gambling addict in denial.

We’ve got plenty now. No thanks to speculative markets pretending to be Grandma baking fiscal cookies for your 401k.

OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, and 100 Other Companies Call For Action To Defend Against Rogue AI

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from TechCrunch:
Over a hundred tech companies — including OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, and Microsoft — have signed an open letter urging both the private and public sectors to work together to defend themselves from AI-related cyber threats. The letter — which was also signed by prominent cyber firms like CrowdStrike, Okta, and Fortinet, as well as prominent financial institutions and internet infrastructure firms — calls for the adoption of new forms of cyber defense, while also encouraging governments at the “local, national, and international levels” to collaborate on security. “In the coming months, AI-enabled cyber attacks will become far more widespread and sophisticated as models around the world become increasingly capable,” the letter states. “The companies and public services our communities depend on — from hospitals to water treatment plants to the infrastructure that powers the internet — are at risk.”

[…] The letter further suggests the mobilization of a “collective response,” one in which “new partnerships” are formed “to raise security standards and find new solutions to emerging cyber threats.” Several of the AI companies that have signed the letter are still actively developing ever more advanced AI models, highlighting their conflicted position. At the same time, they are also offering programs to use frontier AI models for defensive purposes, including OpenAI’s Daybreak program, Anthropic’s Mythos, and Microsoft’s new cyber platform Perception.

Those responsible call for “police action”

By ITRambo • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
What a bunch of lazy filthy rich companies. They designed and coded the entire mess. Fix this crap on your own, and stop causing inflation while you’re at it.

Re: No, it isn’t obvious

By martin-boundary • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Exactly. They are projecting their own failures onto others.

It’s ok when American LLMs encourage kids to kill themselves, that’s just business and what can you expect from dumb machine systems, but if foreign operators use American LLMs to exploit security weaknesses in American businesses, then suddenly it’s evil rogue AIs and spies.

Nothing to do with our restrained efforts m’am, please sign the dotted line for a donation, we need your help to defend *you*.

Re:isn’t it obvious?

By martin-boundary • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
The Finish Line is getting listed in the NASDAQ quickly. The game is to force pension funds to buy shares, so the original investors and share holders can sell their stakes in the sinking ship at a stupendous profit, before the price completely tanks and ordinary people are left holding worthless retirement nest-eggs.

Quite Ironic

By rickrickles • Score: 3, Interesting Thread
It is quite ironic that the companies making the cyber weapons want everyone to get together to buy their anti-cyber weapons to counter the cyber weapons they are continuing to produce. Talk about creating new markets for yourself…

They should fund an Open Source company

By greytree • Score: 3 Thread
All these rich guys, like Sam Altman, should fund an Open Source, non-profit company to produce cutting-edge AI, so new AIs are owned and overseen by everyone, in public.

What would be a good name for such a company ?

Songs Created By AI Banned From Australia’s Music Charts

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot
Australia’s official music charts will no longer accept songs that are largely or entirely AI-generated, requiring eligible releases to be “substantially human made.” The BBC reports:
The Australian Recording Industry Association (ARIA) said the new code would help “promote the human nature of artistry.” It follows a controversy around a cover of Madonna’s Like A Prayer by Australian DJ Josh Fawaz which recently topped the ARIA dance singles chart and peaked at number 2 on the country’s overall chart. The song has become a staple of commercial radio station playlists and been streamed more than 48 million times on Spotify alone. Fawaz later added generative AI credits to the song after a backlash.

ARIA said that Australian artists were competing for attention “in the most crowded market in history” and that it was “not interested in promoting or celebrating the success of AI-generated music that does not contain human artistry.” Under the new rules, AI assistance can still be used, but humans must have written the song, and have performed the lead vocal and primary instruments. AI can also still be used for mastering songs and, for example, using drum machines and auto tune. […]

Artists will be required to declare AI use when they submit a song for chart consideration. ARIA said that if it later emerged music was largely AI-generated it could retrospectively adjust chart positions, and if the piece topped the charts, it may request that awards given for reaching Number One were returned. Artists and their representatives will be able to challenge their exclusion.
ARIA chief executive Annabelle Herd said: “These changes reflect our intent to remain dynamic and promote the human nature of artistry in what is, to say the least, a rapidly developing space. Artists already use AI tools in their work, the charts can and should evolve to keep room for that, but music generated wholesale by services built on artists’ recordings is a different matter.”
She added: “A chart that rewards unlicensed AI output would undercut the very basis of the recorded music we exist to represent.”

Robots can have their own charts

By abulafia • Score: 3 Thread
Worked for chess.