Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Apple Unveils the iPhone Duo, Its First Foldable iPhone
  2. Microsoft Breaks Another Patch Tuesday Record
  3. GOG Brings Back ‘Big Box’ PC Games, One Printable Template At a Time
  4. Google’s Revived Nuclear Power Plant Gets $1.9 Billion Loan From US Government
  5. OpenAI Says It Has Cracked One of Math’s ‘Millennium Problems’
  6. Star Trek Turns 60
  7. Google Will ‘Degrade’ Search In Europe to Avoid EU Fines
  8. Feds Accuse China of ‘Systematic’ Distillation of US AI Models
  9. Meta Debuts Muse, Its Long-Planned Personal AI Agent
  10. Australia To Let Social Media Users ‘Opt Out’ of Algorithm-Based Feeds
  11. A Secret New Elizabeth Holmes Documentary Stuns Telluride
  12. LG TVs Caught Spying Even When Offline or On Standby
  13. Google DeepMind Publishes AI-Powered Predictions For Effect of All 9 Billion Mutations to Human DNA
  14. Teen Reading Slumps to Worst This Century Due to Surge in Screen Time
  15. Secretive DHS ‘Predictive Policing’ Unit Is Analyzing Americans’ Financial Habits, Pulling Them Over

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Apple Unveils the iPhone Duo, Its First Foldable iPhone

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
At its September event today, Apple unveiled the iPhone Duo, its first foldable iPhone and one of the biggest changes to the device’s form factor since its debut. Starting at $1,999 and available for preorder beginning October 16th, the device is roughly the size of a passport when closed and pairs a 5.4-inch outer screen with a 7.6-inch Super Retina XDR inner display. Apple says the inner screen offers 50% more display area than the iPhone 18 Pro Max, while the exterior display provides about 90% of the screen area of an iPhone 18 Pro. Apple Pencil support for both displays is coming later this year.

Apple redesigned parts of iOS around the folding form factor. Users can run two apps side by side, launch two instances of the same app, save app pairings, and partially fold the phone to prop it up on a table without a stand. The interface automatically adapts as the device is opened, rotated or folded, while apps including Zoom and Slack are already being redesigned to take advantage of the larger canvas.

There are more than 100 components in its hinge, along with carbon-fiber support plates and a titanium layer beneath the folding display. Apple says the multilayer screen structure allows its components to move relative to one another while folding to reduce distortion over time. The phone is IP68 rated and uses Ceramic Shield on the rear and Ceramic Shield 2 on the exterior display.

As for battery life, Apple claims up to 31 hours of video playback using the inner display or 44 hours on the outer screen, although using both displays equally is rated for up to 24 hours per charge. Fast charging can bring the battery to roughly 50% in 20 minutes, though. The device is eSIM-only worldwide and includes Apple’s new C2 modem, which the company says is up to 50% faster than the C1X while consuming up to 15% less power.

What about the camera system? There’s a 48-megapixel ultrawide, along with cameras on both the inner and outer displays. Because the phone can stand partially folded on its own, Apple is pitching new shooting modes including hands-free 4K Dolby Vision HDR time lapses, dual-camera capture and an outer-screen preview that lets subjects see themselves while being photographed.

Developing…

Microsoft Breaks Another Patch Tuesday Record

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Microsoft’s September 2026 Patch Tuesday is its largest ever, fixing a record 966 vulnerabilities, including 105 rated critical and two zero-days already being exploited in attacks. BleepingComputer reports:
This Patch Tuesday addresses 105 “Critical” vulnerabilities, 81 of which are remote code execution, 20 are elevation of privileges, 2 are information disclosure, and 1 security feature bypass.

The approximate number of bugs in each vulnerability category is listed below:
- 438 Elevation of Privilege Vulnerabilities
- 19 Security Feature Bypass Vulnerabilities
- 258 Remote Code Execution Vulnerabilities
- 173 Information Disclosure Vulnerabilities
- 56 Denial of Service Vulnerabilities
- 16 Spoofing Vulnerabilities
Last month, Microsoft’s Patch Tuesday updates fixed 570 security flaws, following 400 vulnerabilities patched in August.

81 remote code execution? WTF?

By gweihir • Score: 3 Thread

That seems very bad even for Microsoft. Have they been vibe-coding or what?

Too many words

By smooth wombat • Score: 3 Thread

You could have stopped at Microsoft Breaks. We just found a previous update from Microsoft breaks the cellular connection in some of our HP laptops. The update flips the IMEI back to the default. We had to get a patch from HP to fix the update.

GOG Brings Back ‘Big Box’ PC Games, One Printable Template At a Time

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica:
Those who remember PC gaming in the days before Steam may have fond memories of the “big box” packaging that made those games stand out as shelf eye candy and sought-after in-home collectibles. Today, PC gaming platform GOG is hoping to reignite some of the nostalgia for those days by adding downloadable 3D models and printable, foldable high-res packaging scans for a handful of PC games on the platform.

Thus far, the “Printable Big Box” collection on GOG is limited to just five games: Armikrog, Descent, Hitman: Codename 47, Myst, and Star Trek: 25th Anniversary. Players browsing those games on the GOG store will now see “3D Boxes” listed among the included “Goodies” before purchase. Owners of those games on GOG can download a ZIP file containing a version of the box art as an animated 3D object file (in an easy-to-open GLB format) and a “flat printable template” in PDF, SVG, and Adobe Illustrator formats. Those downloads allow for what GOG calls “a proper papercraft project for anyone who misses shelves full of PC game boxes.”

The physically focused expansion of the existing GOG Preservation Program comes through a partnership with Benjamin Wimmer’s Big Box Collection website, which has grown since 2015 to include over 1,000 3D scans from his private collection of physical PC games. In an interview with GOG, Wimmer said that while he appreciates the artistry of a good old-fashioned big box, he also appreciates their evolution into the “interactive cards” on modern digital storefronts that “provid[e] us art, screenshots, gameplay videos and whatnot and that not shown as a box, [it] is just good UX.”
“Physical media doesn’t survive the way software can — boxes get lost, crushed, thrown out,” GOG writes in today’s announcement. “Scanning them, and letting you print your own, is preservation in a different shape: the same mission that keeps these games running on modern PCs, applied to the objects they used to come in.”

I’d rather

By ThurstonMoore • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

I’d rather see them bring back the big manuals. Microprose games came with great supplemental info.

Google’s Revived Nuclear Power Plant Gets $1.9 Billion Loan From US Government

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
The U.S. Department of Energy has approved a $1.9 billion loan to NextEra Energy to restart Iowa’s shuttered Duane Arnold nuclear plant, which Google has backed as a power source for its growing AI infrastructure. “The sizable loan is the second of its kind, suggesting that the Trump administration views revived nuclear power as a key source of electricity for tech companies seeking to power their AI data centers,” notes TechCrunch. From the report:
James Danly, Deputy Secretary of Energy, said that the Iowa power plant’s restart in 2029 will “drive down electricity costs,” though he did not explain how. Just 50 megawatts will be set aside for the local power cooperative, NextEra CEO John Ketchum said during an earnings call (PDF) last year. That capacity would cover 18% of Iowa’s demand growth since 2021, the year before ChatGPT was released.

Google is reportedly looking to build up to six data centers near the Duane Arnold Energy Center, which hasn’t operated since 2020 when an intense rainstorm damaged the power plant. Rather than repair it, NextEra decided to mothball it. At the time, cheap natural gas was flooding the market, making nuclear power economically unappealing. A lot has changed in the last six years, though. After decades of little growth in demand, the sudden rise of AI coupled with broader electrification of the economy meant that utilities and power providers were suddenly scrambling to find new generating sources of electricity. New data centers are expected to nearly triple the sector’s electricity demand by 2035.

Re: Its very puzzling, isn’t it?

By bazorg • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

TFS says “US Government”, so part of the mystery might be plain old corruption?

Re:If you are made about

By ArchieBunker • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

100% bullshit.

My goto example is the Barakah plant over in the UAE. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…

You think there were leftists and environmental protesters slowing construction over there? Plus it was joint effort with South Korea.

As with every nuclear plant it was years late and ended up costing $32 billion instead of the projected $20 billion.

Yep

By rsilvergun • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
So you can’t let the public at large know that we could transition to wind and solar and power everything we’ve got for basically free (before all the dipshits pile in free in the sense that the value generated by the electricity far out strips the cost, if I spend $1 to make $10 that $1 is effectively free)

We can’t have that because it’ll start the discussion of publicly available electricity instead of private ownership of electricity. And we can’t have that because we have to have the Epstein class ruling over us and taking some of our children off to an island to do terrible things to them. I haven’t quite figured out why we have to have the Epstein class but about 40% of the country thinks it’s essential.

Also starting up an old nuclear power plant has the advantage that it’s dirt cheap to do as long as you don’t care about safety which they don’t.

That’s what really scares me. Fukushima happened not because nuclear plants can’t be safe but because private companies are run to be profitable for the next quarter and the next quarter but they could care less about disasters 20 years from now and you can always put off maintenance.

The CEOs who caused the Fukushima disaster and caused the city to be evacuated for 10 years went on television and cried a little bit and got away with it. They were repeatedly told they needed to build a large water break and they were repeatedly told they needed to buy expensive portable generators and have them ready to go off site. These things would have cost millions so they pocketed the money and when the inevitable happened did a public relations campaign blitz instead which was much much cheaper.

And I cannot emphasize this enough, when it was over the public blamed the engineers.

Private companies learned from Fukushima that they can skip maintenance pocket the money and let a disaster happen and we will blame the workers instead of the Epstein class psychopaths who made it happen.

Re:What could possibly go right?

By SumDog • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
They won’t be doing it themselves. They’ll have to contract out. Most nuclear plants use Bechtel, Sargent and Lundy and like a dozen other NRC certified contractors. People work their asses off to get into those programs, but you can easily get stuck in a situation where you’re moving every 2~4 years to a new nuclear plant. People who want families often try to get FTE positions.

The big danger is draining people from TVA or other power providers. Data center electricians are pulling in $200k/year right now! A loan like this could draw out people from other plants for that big payout. But in reality, unless they plant to build new plants and use this to train up new nuclear workers, they’re just going to hurt the existing energy industry.

But that’s the big issue: no one can build a new reactor today. And no, not because of NRC regulations. America literally has no steel plants large enough to create a nuclear pressure vessel. These things are massive, and historically had to be transported by river or have specialized roads put in to move them. The last steel plant that could make these closed decades ago. The smaller reactors people are talking about are totally non-viable. Nuclear works because of the scale. Each pressure vessel and reactor core can provide 1Gw ~ 1.5Gw of power. All three TVA nuclear plants (max of 7 reactors between SQN, WBN and BFN plants .. I think only 6 are operational) produce between 6Gw ~ 7Gw of power. Keep that in mind when you hear about data centers needing like 20Gw. That’s a fucking insane amount of energy!

Re:What could possibly go right?

By Kernel Kurtz • Score: 5, Informative Thread

But that’s the big issue: no one can build a new reactor today. And no, not because of NRC regulations. America literally has no steel plants large enough to create a nuclear pressure vessel. These things are massive, and historically had to be transported by river or have specialized roads put in to move them. The last steel plant that could make these closed decades ago.

“For very large ‘Generation III+' reactors, production of the pressure vessel requires, or is best undertaken by, forging presses of about 140-150 MN (14-15,000 tonnes) capacity which accept hot steel ingots of 500-600 tonnes. These are not common, and individual large presses do not have high throughput – about four pressure vessels per year appears to be common at present, fitted in with other work, though the potential is greater than this.

Reactor vendors prefer large forgings to be integral, as single products, but for large units split forgings are welded together. These welds then need checking through the life of the plant, and the fewer that are required in fabrication the better. Also, whereas Generation II reactors might have required some 2000 tonnes of forgings, the largest modern designs require about twice this amount. For example, Westinghouse has said that the minimum requirement for making the largest AP1000 components is a 15,000 tonne press taking 350 tonne ingots.

The very heavy forging capacity in operation today is in Japan (Japan Steel Works), China (China First Heavy Industries, China Erzhong, Shanghai Electric), South Korea (Doosan, Taewoong), France (Le Creusot), and Russia (OMZ Izhora, Atommash, Petrozavodskmash, ZiO-Podolsk).

New capacity is being built by these and other companies in Japan, China, South Korea, Czech Republic and Russia.

New capacity is planned in India (Larsen & Toubro, Bharat Heavy Electricals, Bharat Forge Ltd). In China the Harbin Boiler Co. and SEC subsidiary SENPE are increasing capacity.

Nothing in North America currently approaches these enterprises.* The changed position of the USA is remarkable. In the 1940s it manufactured over 2700 Liberty ships, each 10,800 tonne DWT – possibly pioneering modular construction at that scale (average construction time was 42 days in the shipyard). In the 1970s it had a substantial heavy infrastructure, but today China, Japan, South Korea, India, Europe and Russia are all well ahead of it. Steelmaker ArcelorMittal, based in Luxembourg, now owns the US company which built most US reactor pressure vessels in the 1970s-1980s.

*In the 1970s, requirements were more modest: both US Steel and Bethlehem Steel had 8000 tonne presses and could handle 300 tonne ingots. US forging capacity has not been significantly upgraded since, partly due to lack of integration with steel mills and melt shops to supply the hot steel as 600-tonne ingots.”


https://world-nuclear.org/info…

The smaller reactors people are talking about are totally non-viable. Nuclear works because of the scale.

OPG has run the numbers and disagrees. On the bright side their SMR construction continues along on time so you will have some real examples to learn from soon.

https://www.opg.com/projects-s…

OpenAI Says It Has Cracked One of Math’s ‘Millennium Problems’

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from The New York Times:
OpenAIsaid on Tuesday that its newest artificial intelligence technology had solved one of the “Millennium Problems,” a collection of important unanswered math questions meant to push the world’s leading mathematicians to new heights. The announcement is an another clear sign that A.I. is fundamentally changing the upper reaches of mathematics, which have long been viewed as a pinnacle of human achievement. The change has excited some mathematicians, while stirring concern among others.

Over the past year, A.I. systems successfully solved a wide range of problems that have bedeviled mathematicians for decades. But these problems were not as complex, nor as closely watched, as the one that OpenAI’s technology has solved over the past several days. The Millennium Problems are among the most heavily researched in the field. “This is a spectacular culmination of the arc we have seen over the past twelve months,” OpenAI researcher Sebastien Bubeck said of the company’s new solution.

The company announced that one of its latest models, which has not yet been released to the public, needed just 88 hours to solve what mathematicians call “the Navier-Stokes existence and smoothness problem.” This problem involves a series of equations that are often used to predict the weather. The equations describe the movement of water and other fluids. The Navier-Stokes problem, which has no clear practical value, asks whether these equations completely break down in certain situations. OpenAI’s proof claims to have defined just such a situation.

This would imply, at least theoretically, that the laws of physics themselves would break down under certain conditions: that, for example, water could be made to spontaneously explode. But mathematicians and physicists do not believe that this mathematical breakdown could really lead to such an outcome in the physical world. The Navier-Stokes problem was one of seven “Millennium Problems” selected by the Clay Mathematics Institute in the year 2000 as a way of tracking the progress of mathematics in the new millennium. The institute, founded by an American businessman named Landon T. Clay, offered a million dollars for the first correct solution to each problem. Before OpenAI’s announcement, only one of the problems had been solved.
OpenAI says it managed to solve the Navier-Stokes problem by coordinating as many as 10,000 AI agents, an extremely expensive process that may have cost millions of dollars in computing power.
For those curious about the findings, the company has released a paper (PDF) and formal Lean proof.

Cracking a few eggs

By OrangeTide • Score: 5, Funny Thread

You can’t make an omelet without boiling a few oceans.

The statement from the researcher to cries foul

By Ploulack • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

https://cims.nyu.edu/~tristanb/statement.pdf

Re:NS no value?

By Dahan • Score: 5, Informative Thread
The Navier-Stokes problem is not the same as the Navier-Stokes equations. The equations have uses. The problem is a question about the equations, but apparently, there’s no practical benefit to knowing the answer.

Re:NS no value?

By JasterBobaMereel • Score: 5, Informative Thread

The Navier Stoke problem has no practical uses, as it is only proved that there are extreme edge cases of the Navier Stoke equations, that might not even be possible in reality, where the laws of physics break down

People who use the Navier Stokes equations are unlikely to every get near these edge cases, the problem was simply do these extreme edge cases exist, and apparently the answer is yes

Re:Or, counterpoint, it stole somebody else’s work

By JoshuaZ • Score: 5, Informative Thread
Bubeck, the mathematician at OpenAI has responded to these allegations https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7503148080888893440/

1) The screenshot is my reaching out to Levent to coordinate our releases. I hope it’s clear from the message that we came in with the best possible intentions.

2) I never ever asked for Levent to be removed from authorship of his own work (as indicated by my text). I was surprised to learn during the call with Tristan that they had only solved Euler and not Navier-Stokes; after learning this we brainstormed possible paths forward. One option we discussed was that Tristan could be the lead author on a rewrite of OpenAI’s Navier-Stokes proof. It is in that context that I said “it would be simpler if Levent was not an Anthropic employee” because I felt it would be inappropriate for an Anthropic employee to author OpenAI’s work. Importantly it was admitted that internal Anthropic models had been used in their proof of Euler blowup; I therefore felt I could not consider Levent to be an independent academic. Another option I wanted to propose (but got cut short) is to offer access to our internal model so that they could try to finish their proof and bridge the gap between Euler and NS. Again I did not know how to navigate giving access to internal OpenAI IP to an Anthropic employee.

3) To reiterate it plainly: as my text clearly indicates, and as I said during our call, OpenAI’s intention was to do everything possible to celebrate their mathematical achievements and the heroic efforts that they made on Euler. In the call I was immediately met with a litany of slander, including direct threats that if we were to announce Navier-Stokes he would immediately go to the press with a barrage of unfounded accusations. I refuted all these accusations but he replied “there is nothing you can do, I simply do not trust you”. I was confused why one would turn an incredible source for celebration (of their achievements!) into such bickering, which is when I said that I did not understand why one would risk their career [over unfounded accusations]. Genuinely, at that moment, I was trying to care for him and do a last ditch attempt to get a chance to give them all the credits that they deserve. I deeply apologize for this extremely poor choice of words, it is the opposite of what I was trying to convey. (I should say that I retracted them on the spot by the way.)

4) Overall, on a personal level, it was incredibly difficult to have these conversations. Levent refused to attend any of the meetings despite my repeated asking. As Sholto Douglas said, there will need to be coordination between Anthropic and OpenAI in the future; I felt I was doing a proxy negotiation with Anthropic while the Anthropic employee refused to directly participate.

I don’t know whose version of events is accurate here, but some of the details due support Bubeck’s version. I suspect that a breakdown of communication occurred where both then misinterpreted what the other saying in a more hostile way than it was intended until the conversation then became genuinely hostile. In terms of the math, although I’m a mathematician, differential equations is pretty far from my expertise, so I cannot deeply evaluate how close the methods were. However, it is the case that the both were building on the methods of Cordoba-Martinez-Zoroa. In this context, my being far from this sort of work is relevant, because this was a well known enough approach that even though I’m in a pretty different subfield, I had heard of CMZ’s work as an approach and that this was considered a promising approach to Navier-Stokes. Given that, my inclination is that the case that any theft occurred here is very weak.

Star Trek Turns 60

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
“Star Trek” marks its 60th anniversary today, September 8, six decades after the original series premiered in 1966 and went on to become one of the most successful science-fiction franchises in television history. Outlets across the web are commemorating the milestone with full health reports, hot takes, behind-the-scenes retrospectives, and reflections on the franchise’s influence and what may lie ahead. The New York Times reports:
As of 2026, the 60-year-old science fiction franchise boasts a fandom of carbon units — sorry, humans — that spans at least three generations. What began, in 1966, as a five-year space mission on the U.S.S. Enterprise to “boldly go where no man has gone before” now represents an anthology of space travel across more than 25 series and films in parts of two centuries. Where once it was James T. Kirk or bust, it’s not unusual to find fans who prefer other captains, like Picard, Janeway or Sisko. There are so many series to keep track of that fans often communicate using country code-like abbreviations for each installment: TOS (the original series), TNG (“The Next Generation”), DS9 (“Deep Space Nine”), ENT (“Enterprise”) and so on.

Outside the Trekiverse, disparities in generational slang, politics and social mores are practically a foregone conclusion. But “Star Trek” functions as connective tissue between fans past and present. Some of that tissue is just shared references: There will always be captain’s logs, timelines by stardate, warp factors one through 10, phasers and photon torpedoes and, every now and then, a doctor who insists, “I’m a doctor, not a ____!” The Vulcan salute has become a general symbol of geek-recognize-geek, but real Trekkies (or Trekkers, as some prefer) know that “Live long and prosper” is only half the message; the recipient is meant to say “Peace and long life” in response. But the series’ staying power, and the ease with which each generation finds its way into them, is an indication that fans of all ages share not only language, but values, in common.
Here are some of our favorite Slashdot stories from the early days. The 2004 “Should Star Trek Die?” is an especially good callback today because it features LeVar Burton (Geordi La Forge in Star Trek: The Next Generation) arguing that Trek needs to disappear for several years to become special again…
Star Trek Lawsuit (1998)
Salon Writes on The Troubles with “Trek” (1999)
Star Trek’s Next Series (2001)
Should Star Trek Die? (2004)
UPN Officially Cancels ‘Star Trek: Enterprise’ (2005)

Re:After Going To The Woke Galaxy

By kamapuaa • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Right, whites and blacks kissing on TV! Heavy handed messages about race - like, one race is white on the left half, the other race is white on the right half, and they think it’s so important! Women as bridge officers, Jews actors playing the biggest roles, constant anti-war themes, capitalism depicted as a primitive relic of Earth’s past…the list goes on. Just disgusting.

Re:Ironically I was quite a trekkie until this yea

By hyades1 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Buddy…when the original Star Trek ran, it was a different world, especially in the case of what was allowed on television. The bedrooms of married couples showed twin beds. The first interracial kiss in US television history occurred on Star Trek, and that episode was banned across much of the South. Women were not considered worthy of positions of authority, especially if it included having authority over men. It was literally a different world. Until the advent of Star Trek, “science fiction” on television consisted of simple-minded fantasy series like Lost In Space, Time Tunnel, Land of the Giants, etc. Tropes such as faster-than-light travel and interstellar conflict, which Babylon 5 relied upon, barely existed before Star Trek. Even sub-plots that carried on for whole seasons were rare. Episodes were expected to stand alone.

Let me put it this way: The original Star Trek swam in very different waters than Babylon 5, and it changed the rules in ways that allowed Babylon 5 to be what it was (which was excellent, by the way).

Re: 1960s ‘woke’ was not 2020s ‘woke’

By greytree • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Being woke back then meant being opposed to using race or sex in college admissions or hiring.

Being anti-woke now means being opposed to using race or sex in college admissions or hiring.

Re: 1960s ‘woke’ was not 2020s ‘woke’

By MrKaos • Score: 4, Funny Thread

Being woke

Being trapped in a binary star system while telepathic beings project their requests for hydrogen so they too can escape isn’t woke. It’s interference with the brainwave modes required for sleep.

Being awake all the time is bad sometimes you need to be asleep so you don’t go mad.

Re: After Going To The Woke Galaxy

By ArchieBunker • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Why do republicans think about trans people so much?

Google Will ‘Degrade’ Search In Europe to Avoid EU Fines

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Google says it will overhaul Search in Europe to comply with the EU’s Digital Markets Act, giving more prominence to comparison services like Expedia and Hotels.com while stripping some real-time features from hotel, airline, and restaurant results. “These changes degrade the user experience for Europeans — boosting online intermediaries at the expense of local businesses, and removing helpful features people rely on every day,” said Nick Fox, senior vice-president of knowledge and information at Google. The company claims its past search changes for DMA compliance were tied to a 30% decrease “in free, direct booking traffic to European businesses.” Engadget reports:
That sanction was the latest salvo between the EU government and a US tech company for infringing on its Digital Markets Act. The debate centers on the DMA requirement that major tech brands “must not treat their own services more favorably in ranking than third-party services.”

[…] According to Reuters, Google’s revised search results “will highlight one specialized search engine at the top of the page, followed by two others with fewer details. A carousel of hotels, airlines and restaurants, for example, will sit below them with key features such as real-time prices stripped out.” Those specialized engines include sites like Expedia or Hotels.com, also known as vertical search services, so European users may soon see those aggregators and comparison sites prioritized more highly than individual businesses’ websites in their results.

Reuters noted that “the rankings will be determined by Google’s algorithm,” meaning the tech company still holds a lot of control over how results are displayed. The EC had given Google 60 days to comply with its rules, but the company has not specified an exact timeline for when European users will start seeing the changes.

Already?

By wgoodman • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Google search is already heavily degraded by all of that crap.

Re:Already?

By TheWho79 • Score: 4, Funny Thread
Yep - AIO is the biggest degrade in the history of search - just filthy stupid. I’ve been changing to Claude and Chatgpt almost exclusively for search. *uck Google.

While this might degrade the user experience

By taustin • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

this isn’t intended to protect that. It’s intended to protect their competitors. Which it may or may not do well, but Google whining about user experience is an open admission that they know full well they are the problem.

Re:While this might degrade the user experience

By allo • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

And the Enshittification playbook is, that once the competitors are gone, they start degrading it for the users. Currently they may spare the user a click, but if the competition is eliminated they start charging sites for the click and the sites add the cost to the cost the user pays (direct or indirect). Competition is important to ensure fair play.

Re:Do people still use Google for search?

By jenningsthecat • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

It’s all fucking garbage. Lycos or Altavista would be better today.

I have fond, fond memories of AltaVista from back in the day. It actually honoured my search terms and operators, and - shock of shocks! - gave me NO hits when there were no relevant results. Unlike today, when multiple excludes are totally ignored and the results just shove low-grade shit in my face.

I’m planning on playing around more with ChatGPT to see how well it does with simple Arduino and OpenSCAD coding. I think I’ll try using it for search as well - it probably can’t be worse than the search engines I curse at every day.

Feds Accuse China of ‘Systematic’ Distillation of US AI Models

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
The NSA, CISA, and FBI are accusing (PDF) several Chinese AI companies of carrying out “industrial-scale” distillation campaigns against leading U.S. models such as ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Grok. Since at least 2024, the companies have allegedly routed millions of requests across accounts, APIs, proxies, cloud providers, and third-party aggregators to extract capabilities for their own models. “China-based artificial intelligence companies are conducting systematic extraction of proprietary functionalities and capabilities of U.S. AI companies’ models through industrial-scale knowledge distillation campaigns that form the core — not merely a supplement — of their AI development strategy,” the agencies wrote. CyberScoop reports:
DeepSeek, for example, distilled frontier U.S. models to generate synthetic training data for its R1 and R3 models, including four different versions of Claude, two versions of Gemini, five versions of ChatGPT and Grok 4. Those models helped train DeepSeek’s capabilities in areas like agentic functioning, question and answer optimization, creative and occupational writing and others.

Another Chinese company, Moonshot AI, allegedly distilled 18 different U.S. models — including Fable 5, Anthropic’s current, most advanced commercially available model — to train its Kimi-K2 and Kimi K3 models. The company used millions of queries meant to extract enhanced capabilities in areas like agentic reasoning, coding and data analysis, computer vision, larger logical frameworks, visual processing and others.

Chinese AI companies manage a sophisticated set of tools and systems that route requests and prompts through multiple pathways to avoid detection. The advisory lists common tactics observed by Chinese companies, including spreading requests across different accounts, models and platforms, using native APIs, remote cloud providers, and third-party aggregators to obfuscate user metadata, and leveraging proxies and gray tech markets to get around geographic restrictions, terms of use and safeguards built into frontier models.

Lolol

By dotslashdot • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
You mean they are stealing the copyrighted proprietary works of others without compensation or warning? Say it is not so!

So AI Finances dependant on Chinese accounts?

By ealbers • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Does that mean most of the paid accounts of openai and anthropic are Chinese accounts?

Not a good look for a IPO

Re:Lolol

By ceoyoyo • Score: 5, Informative Thread

They’re not stealing, and its not copyrightable. They’re signing up, paying the requested amount, sending queries and accepting the responses.

“Accuse”

By reanjr • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

The word “accuse” is being used as if it’s some sort of crime or unethical to engage in this behavior. It is not. This is the inevitable result of a retarded business model pushed by well-connected tech morons like Sam Altman.

Re:Lolol

By memory_register • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Obligatory Princess Bride reference:

“You are trying to kidnap what I have rightfully stolen!”

Meta Debuts Muse, Its Long-Planned Personal AI Agent

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Meta has launched Muse, a personal AI agent developed under chief AI officer Alexandr Wang. “The product, long in development, was touted as a key next step by CEO Mark Zuckerberg in his recent 6,500-word manifesto,” reports Axios. From the report:
Muse, as the agent is known, exists in a chat interface, similar to a text thread. It’s designed to be more proactive and long-running than typical chatbots. Users can name their agent, create an avatar and customize how it communicates. The Muse agent runs on a dedicated virtual machine in Meta’s cloud, using a built-in browser that’s visible to the user.

Meta is offering a free tier of Muse, as well as two subscription options, at $20 per month and $100 per month. “For the vast majority of users, they should be able to do what they need to within the free tier,” Wang told Axios. “But for real power users, you know, those subscription tiers help us cover the computer costs.” There is no advertising within Muse, but Wang said the company is exploring commerce opportunities that could generate additional revenue. Initially Muse will be available in the U.S. and works on iOS, Android and the web, with support coming soon for Meta’s AI glasses.
“The full vision in the future is we want to develop personal superintelligence that helps people accomplish their goals, pursue their passions, build things that they never would have built if they didn’t have the technology,” Wang told Axios.
Meta offers users more privacy controls with Muse than in its previous AI products, including the option to prevent queries from being used by Meta and a planned confidential mode where the company cannot see activity inside a user’s virtual workspace. There’s also an entirely separate system called Sentinel that governs Muse’s access to the internet and connected services.

Where’s The Price War?

By SlashbotAgent • Score: 3 Thread

All these AIs fighting for their piece of the pie. I’d expect such competition to lower prices. Yet everyone, regardless of quality/capability, seems to be stuck with Free(crap), $20, and $100 tiers.

Pretty pricey for a flooded market, I think.

“Long Planned” is not “Long awaited”

By grasshoppa • Score: 3 Thread

Did anyone ask for this? Or will this be yet another AI product shoved down the throats of people that don’t want it?

Just imagine the additional amount of data…

By ffkom • Score: 3 Thread
… Meta can extract from you (and sell for profit) once their software is used for whatever you lazily delegate to it. Plus they can teach their “agent” to spend your money on Meta products as often as possible.

Re:Where’s The Price War?

By EvilSS • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Keeping prices the same IS the price war. All of those plans run way below what the equivalent API costs would be, and it’s not getting any cheaper to run the models on the back end.

That’s a great solution

By niff • Score: 3 Thread
For Meta, it’s a paid service with tie-ins and vendor dependency and total insights and control over everything you do, 24/7. Then combine that with everything else meta already knows about its customers.

I totally get why Meta wants this product to exist!

Thanks, but I’ll pass. I’m sure there will be suckers who fall for this.
And if it fails they’ll still sneak it into insta, Facebook or WhatsApp.

Australia To Let Social Media Users ‘Opt Out’ of Algorithm-Based Feeds

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Australia is proposing the "My Feed, My Way" initiative that would force social media platforms to let users over 16 turn off algorithmic recommendations and instead see only posts from people and creators they follow. Platforms that fail to comply could face fines of up to $79 million. CNBC reports:
The legislation, which is being drafted and released Tuesday for targeted consultation, would require platforms to send notifications to new and existing users so they can choose their default feed. […] The measures, set to be introduced to the Parliament of Australia this year, will also require AI chatbots, online games and other digital services to take action to protect under-18s from addictive design features.
“This is not about giving government control. It’s about giving people control. It’s about putting choice back into the hands of Australians online,” said Prime Minister Anthony at a press conference on Tuesday.

“This is sensible, pragmatic, practical reform. It gives users choice, and it will hold the big tech companies responsible for inaction.”

clueless

By flippy • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
When will politicians realize that fines like $79 million are rounding errors to these companies? It’s not a fine, it’s a cost of doing business to them. Because of that, even if this passes it will be useless.

Re:It’s a for profit business

By gurps_npc • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

You have fallen victim to several errors associated with Laissez-faire capitalism. I am a strong proponent of Capitalism but the issues you describe are inherently incorrect.

1) They do not need to prove it is harmful, capitalism routinely engages in preventative regulations. There are legal rules on things like the width of roads, medication use by dates, ingredients in food, etc. It is up to the business to show that their practices do no harm, not the other way around.

2) The client cannot easily vote with their presence/$$$ or presence because the social Media industries have no direct competition and MASSIVE problems ‘transferring’ accounts - problems the companies create.

3) If their business hinges on algorithms is irrelevant. No one is entitled to a profit. You must earn the profit by winning the competition within the rules the country creates. If one country handicaps the industry, so what? 90% of the profit will still be there - to be earned by the company that best competes within the rules the government . Sure, they may make 10% less compared to social media in other countries, but they will still make a profit and the loss is a small price to pay for the benefit of society.

Re:clueless

By HiThere • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Well, the CEO won’t be in Australia, so they’re going to have to operate through extradition proceedings. Good Luck.

Re:It’s a for profit business

By Ocker3 • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
Lots of people have done that, or tried, and Meta just buys them and folds the data into the same algorithms again, and again.

Re:It’s a for profit business

By thegarbz • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

If a business you are using DOESN’T provide the service you think you should get, you go elsewhere, seems simple.

Except is is providing the service people want along with some negative problems associated with it. And where else do you go when every competitor has the same problem?

You are entitled in a manner I can barely comprehend. Solve the problem…You want to tell the company what they can and can’t do you control freak.

Yes. We need to be control freaks. Companies are not your friend, they do nothing with your interest in mind. If given the choice they will outright kill you for profit. The entire world seems to have recognised that protective regulation, both in terms of protecting consumers, and protecting competition is a good thing. But for some reason a few weirdos like you are holdouts. Please open an economics textbook and read the first few chapters. You’ll learn very quickly that unchecked, unregulated capitalism does not in any way work out in your best interest. The market you enjoy is literally a mathematically unstable condition, and the only stable end solution is when corporations retain full control.

Regulations exist to prevent that. But sure I can understand if you simp for mega corps that everyone else would appear “entitled” in your eyes.

A Secret New Elizabeth Holmes Documentary Stuns Telluride

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from TechCrunch:
Telluride just managed one of its best-kept secrets in years, per The Hollywood Reporter. On Sunday night, festival-goers filed into a 650-seat theater with their phones locked away, having no idea what they were about to see, told only that it ran nearly three hours, hadn’t been shown anywhere, and that its principal creators would be in the audience. The surprise premiere they went on to enjoy is a new documentary from co-directors Nathan Fielder and Lance Oppenheim about Theranos founder Elizabeth Holmes.

Called “You Can See Everything,” the film is said to capture Holmes and her husband, Billy Evans, in the 34 days before she reported to federal prison in May 2023 to begin an 11-year sentence for defrauding investors about her blood-testing technology. Since then, her legal fight has limped along without success. Her appeals to overturn the conviction and shorten her sentence were rejected in February of last year. She then went a different route last year, asking President Trump to commute her sentence. That clemency petition is still listed as pending, meaning it’s officially been opened and remains under review.

Fielder apparently lived in the couple’s guest house during filming — the access they provided sounds shocking — but some of the buzz also ties to an A-list actress who becomes part of the story itself. A24 is set to release the film in October.
You can watch a trailer for the film on YouTube.

Re:It’s just like The Osbornes!

By Powercntrl • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I really don’t understand why this is even that newsworthy. The last time I recall some documentary making it into the mainstream headspace was during Covid when everyone watched that Tiger King thing because Netflix’s algorithm was like “You’ve binge watched Stranger Things fifteen times and seen everything else that’s halfway decent - here’s this random documentary that you’ll probably tolerate because it’s at least in English.”

Re:Couldn’t imagine…

By alvinrod • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Do you regularly go to film festivals? The people who regularly do are the sort of people who tend to follow the industry closely and know a lot about upcoming films in much the same way that posters here follow rumors about unreleased tech products. For them the prospect of being one of a few hundred people who get to screen something that no one else has seen before or even heard about is going to be an alluring proposition, in much the same way that plenty of people here would jump at the opportunity to beta test some secret new tech product that’s been kept under wraps during development. Maybe it will be a waste of time, but the potential is what draws us in.

Re: It’s just like The Osbornes!

By ThurstonMoore • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

It’s called a Slashvertisment, someone paid for this shit “story” to be here. If it wasn’t we’d know the mystery actress by the end of the summary.

A clear case of fictional prescience :o

By Mirnotoriety • Score: 5, Informative Thread
Hawaii Five-O S01E19 (1969): Medical quack Dr. Fremont claims to have a machine that detects disease from a single blood drop. McGarrett swaps out the blood sample for vegetable oil exposing her as a fraud.

Re: It’s just like The Osbornes!

By thegarbz • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

someone paid for this shit “story” to be here

No one paid for this. Slashdot is reliant on user submissions. Someone submitted it here, it had Elizabeth Holmes in the title, Slashdot has a history of running stories concerning her, and editors put it on the front page.

Done.

Don’t like it? Submit something more relevant. This site is what YOU make of it.

LG TVs Caught Spying Even When Offline or On Standby

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
A Gamers Nexus investigation found that LG smart TVs are almost constantly logging and uploading data about owners and their homes, even while they are offline or in standby mode. “The company’s TV sets scan Wi-Fi networks for nearby devices, record audio logs through their microphones, and use audio and video sampling to recognize exactly what you’re watching from across the TV inputs,” reports The Verge. From the report:
Gamers Nexus partnered with fellow YouTubers Level1Techs and independent security researchers for the investigation, which involved testing retail LG OLEDs. Packet captures showed the TVs scanning the local area network for nearby hardware like phones or smartwatches, as well as logging location data and details of nearby Wi-Fi networks, and feeding the information back to LG Ad Solutions. Perhaps more concerningly, the TVs were capable of recording microphone audio when in standby; this continued even after the TV was disconnected from the internet, with audio files stored offline and uploaded once a connection was restored.
Earlier this year, LG was found to be silently installing an adware-like app on Windows PCs that ran pop-up ads for other LG apps and even McAfee antivirus.

Re:Nope

By JaredOfEuropa • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Until they get an edge TPU to process the locally gathered data and send the results (now much reduced in size compared to the raw data) to the mothership, using 4G/5G. Like modern cars are already doing.

Re:Water is wet

By dmomo • Score: 5, Informative Thread

That doesn’t mean drawing outrage and attention to it isn’t useful. If bad corporate behavior isn’t verified and amplified, no action will be taken against it.

FTA

By JBMcB • Score: 5, Informative Thread
From what I’ve heard, they scan for open WiFi networks and auto-connect to upload data. They don’t tell you that they are doing this.

Re:Nope

By thegarbz • Score: 5, Informative Thread

TV can’t do much in the way of spying if I don’t connect it to the internet now can it ?

And yet if you actually watch the in depth discussion, the TV very much may find its own way on the internet, even if you don’t connect it to anything yourself. A good portion of the story is dedicated to those people who think using them as offline dumb TVs is okay, being wrong.

Re: Water is wet

By JustAnotherOldGuy • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

but you can for instance revoke all microphone consent and avoid any concerns of your audio being sent to LG.

Trusting LG to stop spying on me by telling them “stop spying on me” requires a level of trust I simply do not have. Does anyone really believe that LG will honor any of your choices?

I seriously hope no one thinks that clicking a checkbox actually turns off the LG spy features, because I’m pretty sure it doesn’t.

Google DeepMind Publishes AI-Powered Predictions For Effect of All 9 Billion Mutations to Human DNA

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Google DeepMind has released AlphaGenome Atlas, a free research database containing AI-generated predictions for the effects of all 9 billion possible single-letter mutations in the human genome. Built from its AlphaGenome model, the atlas is designed to help scientists interpret both protein-coding and harder-to-understand regulatory DNA. Fortune reports:
AlphaGenome Atlas, as DeepMind calls the database, is a precomputed catalogue of what each substitution of a single DNA base is likely to do to the machinery that switches genes on and off. Until now researchers had to run such a model one variant at a time or had to test variants in the laboratory, a process that was painstakingly slow. It would have taken many human lifetimes to discover the consequences of all 9 billion possible single-letter mutations. The Atlas promises to make the job of biologists and medical researchers considerably easier, potentially speeding up the understanding of genetic diseases and the hunt for possible cures.

Pushmeet Kohli, DeepMind’s vice president for research and head of its AI for science team, told reporters on a briefing call that this was the first time any researcher in the world could reach a comprehensive map of human genetic variation “by simply opening a browser.” Kohli also framed the release as helping to complete the unfinished business of the Human Genome Project, which in 2003 succeeded in mapping the entire human DNA sequence. “As the saying goes, we bought the book,” he said, “but we did not understand how to read it.”

Atlas is available for non-commercial use from today through a website Google DeepMind has set up for it. The company said it would be available for commercial use through a licensing arrangement through Google Cloud “soon.” Kohli said that Google DeepMind’s sister company,ÂIsomorphic Labs, which is using AI for drug discovery, would have access to Atlas but that it would also require a commercial license for access. He did not specify exactly what the terms would be for commercial licensing. A paper describing the Atlas and how it was created is being released on bioRxiv, a repository for biomedical preprint academic papers.

Sadly 10 Billion of them

By Growlley • Score: 4, Funny Thread
turn you into Aqua Man.

Best guess != labwork

By pla • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

this was the first time any researcher in the world could reach a comprehensive map of human genetic variation “by simply opening a browser.”

Not quite. This is the first time any researcher in the world can get an AI’s best guess as to what each single substitution might do. All that “painfully slow” research of testing actual variants in the lab is, by contrast, real data.

Don’t get me wrong, this is very, very cool, and will almost certainly lead to a lot of new discoveries - Along with a lot of false positives and dead-ends. I’m not even an AI hater, despite having serious reservations about alignment. This, however, is exactly the type of inquiry where AI hallucinates the worst: An open-ended “what if” question where the answer isn’t allowed to be “I don’t know”.

Here’s a quick sanity check every one of us should do occasionally - Go ask ChatGPT a subtle open-ended “why” question in your own field of expertise… And have a good laugh at how hilariously wrong the answer is.

Teen Reading Slumps to Worst This Century Due to Surge in Screen Time

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Teen reading, math, and science scores have fallen to their lowest levels since international PISA testing began in 2000, with 15-year-olds now reading at roughly the level previously expected of students a year younger. The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) linked weaker results to more screen time, less reading for pleasure, and digital distraction. It also found that students who regularly used AI chatbots for tasks like drafting essays and summarizing text scored about 20 points lower in science, roughly equivalent to a year of learning. Reuters reports:
A 2012 reading high of 501 on PISA’s index had declined to a score of 466 last year. The test is widely regarded as the world’s leading gauge of educational performance and its results are closely scrutinized by governments and educators. “In reading, more screen time and less reading for pleasure have gone hand in hand with weaker results,” OECD head Mathias Cormann told a press conference. “We’re also seeing more hasty reading, students rushing through a text and giving a quick wrong answer.”

Reading scores fell more sharply in students from better-off backgrounds, the study added. Hindered by falling reading standards, average teenage science and maths skills were also at their lowest this century. Science fell from a 2009 high of 506 on the index to 486, while maths was down from 502 to 469 in the same period. East Asia was the best-performing region. Chinese cities that participated in the test, Japan, Korea, Singapore and Taiwan had the best educational systems with Britain and Estonia the only countries outside the region that made it into the top 10 in reading, mathematics and science.

British news is slightly different

By mccalli • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
I’m British, and have been following this from the other side of the story. In the UK it’s more fragmented - this year England is up, but Scotland and Wales are down and in some cases quite significantly. Wales seems to have taken a hell of a hit in reading for instance.

It’s better news in maths and science but we’re still behind where we were five-seven years ago except for science. Definitely a mixed bag, though all improvements are welcome of course.

Re:School Requirements

By CubicleZombie • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

They should let kids choose their own books to read. If I hadn’t discovered the sci-fi aisle at the library on my own, Of Mice and Men in 12th grade would have been the last book I ever read. Kids should learn that reading is fun when they’re not doing it for a grade.

Re:School Requirements

By taustin • Score: 5, Informative Thread

It’s a choice made by teachers.

It should be. But more and more these days, teachers get overruled by higher up, including school boards.

Re:compassion fails again

By Targon • Score: 5, Informative Thread

It’s not the teachers doing it, it is the school administrators and school boards who don’t want to lose financial help if the students aren’t above a certain level. Conservatives here in the USA who are more concerned with their religion than making sure students can actually understand what is going on have gotten far too much control of school districts around the country.

Re:Someday it will resurge like vinyl records.

By Zero__Kelvin • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Why you need articles when there is actual video of him saying it? If you weren’t getting your knowledge of the Trumpsterfire from Fox “News” you would have already seen the videos of him saying this, and a plethora of even more idiotic and ignorant things. If you really want proof, try learning how to use Google. Don’t expect us to educate you when you are making zero effort to get an education yourself.

Secretive DHS ‘Predictive Policing’ Unit Is Analyzing Americans’ Financial Habits, Pulling Them Over

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot
An anonymous reader quotes a report from 404 Media:
Border Patrol is running secretive predictive policing units that analyze Americans’ financial activity and other data, then feed that intelligence to local police who pull people over who are not suspected of any specific crime, but which the government thinks may be worth searching, 404 Media has found. The units, the name of which 404 Media is revealing here for the first time, are called Predictive Intelligence Targeting Teams (PITT). In one case, a PITT analyzed the financial activity of a man who was driving across Montana, and local authorities stopped him under the pretense of an obstructed license plate and charged him with a DUI.

404 Media identified one PITT in the Spokane Sector, Washington, which polices the U.S. border with Canada, and another in the Laredo Sector, Texas, which polices the border with Mexico. The findings add to an Associated Press investigation from last year which found Border Patrol was using automatic license plate readers (ALPRs) as part of the same wide-spanning predictive policing program. “The bottom line is genuine probable cause cannot be synthetically generated,” Jake Laperruque, deputy director of the Security and Surveillance Project at the Center For Democracy & Technology, told 404 Media in an email. Here Border Patrol seems to be “using parallel construction to cloak the reason behind its car stops in secrecy. If we can’t meaningfully review and evaluate these systems, we can’t trust them,” he added.

[…] The DHS document obtained by 404 Media shows that Border Patrol is analyzing the financial activity of Americans to find people to pull over. The Associated Press’s investigation found the predictive policing program is also heavily using ALPRs to track potential targets’ movements. It is not clear how exactly Border Patrol is monitoring Americans’ financial activity. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) declined to answer what financial activity the agency was monitoring, and whether it obtained a warrant or not.
A CBP spokesperson told 404 Media in an email: “U.S. Border Patrol uses intelligence-informed analysis and planning to support national security operations, allocate resources, and help identify potential threats and bad actors to public safety. These efforts are conducted consistent with applicable law, policy, privacy protections, and oversight requirements.”
The statement continued: “For operational security reasons, we do not discuss specific analytical methods, data sources, targeting criteria, investigative techniques, system capabilities, or deployment details. Public disclosure of such information could compromise law enforcement operations and investigations as well as creating safety risks for agents and the public.”

Rob Frommer, senior attorney at the Institute for Justice, told 404 Media: “The government’s increasing use of mass surveillance — whether that surveillance comes via ALPRs, financial records, or the like — coupled with predictive policing is a recipe for tyranny. We fought a revolution for the idea that we are citizens, not subjects. Yet schemes like CBP’s Predictive Intelligence Targeting Team treat all Americans as if they are potential suspects. This is not just wrong, it’s unconstitutional, and IJ will keep pushing courts and Congress to end this attack on Americans’ security.”

Re: Well come on bootlickers

By BytePusher • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Just look into qualified immunity and civil asset forfeiture. The police think they can get away with this kind of thing, because they can get away with this kind of thing in a police state.

Re: Wouldn’t any judge throw out every case?

By reanjr • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The whole point of parallel construction is that you find alternative legal bases for bringing in evidence. The fact that the officers can’t be trusted has little impact on the evidence being admissable and damning.

“I’ve done nothing wrong, I don’t care it.”

By gurps_npc • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

This is another nail in the “I’ve done nothing wrong, let them look” argument.

The question is not whether you’ve done anything wrong, but whether the government has done anything wrong. When they refuse to disclose their methodology they are ALWAYS doing something wrong.

The entire point of a free society is that we do not have to nor can we trust the police. Time after time we see they are not significantly better than the general population. If we let them hide their process, it always devolves into an abusive process that targets innocent people and destroys their lives.

Re:Well come on bootlickers

By smooth wombat • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Ah yes, the censorship that still allowed people to see the lies about ivermectin. Clearly an abuse of power to let people see the lies. And no, the technologies in this story were not used by Biden. So another lie which isn’t being censored.

Mandatory vaccinations were for a select group of people: i.e. the military and medical workers. No one else was required to get a vaccination.

But please, continue licking RFK, Jr’s boots. He needs all the help he can get.

Re:Well come on bootlickers

By jhoegl • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
“going towards authoritarianism” and supporting “border patrol, ICE, police, military, and prisons”, is the same thing.
You should look up how there are so many people who are here trying to get citizenship, and why the lag of getting them in as citizens is there. (Hint, defunding of the Immigration courts over 20+ years, you can literally see it in statistics).
Immigration is needed for our country, and that is who we are as a country. So its odd you think it is the worst thing.
And lets address your racist comment, you do know that people of all colors have been here well before the 1980s, which BTW, had a way higher crime rate than right now.
Are you even from the USA? Feels like you dont know anything about this country.