Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Steve Wozniak Tells Graduates They All Have ‘AI’: Actual Intelligence
  2. At Least 80% Responsibility For Ill Health In Old Age Down to Individual, Study Says
  3. AT&T Sues California In Bid To Stop Offering Traditional Phone Service
  4. Thousands of Zillow Listings In Chicago Have Vanished
  5. Vivaldi 8.0 Arrives With ‘Most Significant Design Overhaul’ In Browser’s History
  6. Trump Calls Off AI Executive Order Over Concern It Could Weaken US Tech Edge
  7. Flipper One Could Be the Ultimate Linux Cyberdeck
  8. US To Award $2 Billion To Quantum Companies, Take Equity Stakes
  9. Spotify Will Start Reserving Concert Tickets For Fans
  10. Waymo Pauses Atlanta Service As Its Robotaxis Keep Driving Into Floods
  11. Microsoft Hires Analyst With Influential Video Game Blog To Fix Xbox
  12. OpenAI Claims It Solved an 80-Year-Old Math Problem
  13. SpaceX Reveals Its Finances For the First Time
  14. NASA Expects Chinese Crewed Mission Around the Moon In 2027
  15. Colossal Biosciences Is Growing Chickens In a 3D-Printed Artificial Eggshell

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Steve Wozniak Tells Graduates They All Have ‘AI’: Actual Intelligence

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
While other commencement speeches have been met with boos for hyping up artificial intelligence, Apple cofounder Steve Wozniak reminded college graduates that they already posses “AI” of their own: “actual intelligence.” He framed AI as an attempt to duplicate brain-like routines, and encouraged students to “think different” as they enter a workforce being reshaped by automation. Business Insider reports:
Steve Wozniak did what other college graduation commencement speakers couldn’t this year: earn applause when talking about AI. The Apple cofounder took the stage during Grand Valley State University’s graduation ceremony earlier this month. During his speech, Wozniak offered reassurance to new graduates who are entering the workforce at the height of the AI revolution.

“It would take too long to go deeply into what I think about AI, but we’ve been trying to create a brain,” Wozniak said. “Is there a way we can duplicate a routine a trillion times and have it work like a brain? AI is one of those attempts.” […]

During his commencement address, Wozniak reflected on working at Apple and offered students some advice as they begin their careers. “You should always try to think different,” he said. “Don’t follow the same steps as a million other people. Think, is there something I can do a little different?”
You can watch the clip on YouTube.

good people

By fluffernutter • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
This guy is a class act. It’s no wonder he had “less success”. The people who most people praise are really not good people.

Create a Brain

By GlobalEcho • Score: 4, Funny Thread

The summary left out his best line. Something like:

“Our engineers figured out how to create a brain. It takes 9 months.”

Woz truly is one of the greats. And I am going to leave this here: the $2 bill story: https://www.coinbooks.org/esyl…

Wozniak

By backslashdot • Score: 3 Thread

He is exactly the right guy for a commencement speech — providing the right blend of inspiration and “serve humanity” reminder, not the creep CEOs.

Lemme tellya a story about Eve & the REAL Appl

By Pseudonymous Powers • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
Woz is widely liked, and I personally believe that his heart usually seems to be in the right place. And it’s hard to tell much about the content of his speech from the article. But the idea of making a TRUE artificial mind, only to immediately enslave it as a soldier in a war against human well-being, is such an obvious horror to me that I can’t understand how anybody smart would support it even slightly.

At Least 80% Responsibility For Ill Health In Old Age Down to Individual, Study Says

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
A new Oxford Longevity Project report argues that individuals bear at least 80% of the responsibility for ill health in old age. “The report (PDF), launched at the Smart Ageing Summit in Oxford last week, argues that individuals have far greater control over their longevity than is commonly understood,” reports The Guardian. “The authors call on the government to take legislative action on alcohol comparable to restrictions on smoking.” From the report:
Living Longer, Better — the Oxford Longevity Project’s first Age-less report — was co-authored by an interdisciplinary panel of UK-based experts in medicine, physiology, ageing and education policy. It was sponsored by Oxford Healthspan. The report’s authors, Sir Christopher Ball, Sir Muir Gray, Dr Paul Ch’en, Leslie Kenny and Prof Denis Noble, present the figure of 80% as a conservative estimate. […] The claim, however, has been described as simplistic and said to neglect wider arguments about whether people are genuinely in control of individual choices when it comes to issues including poverty, pollution and healthcare access.

[…] Ball, however, pointed to research including the Landmark Twins Study, where researchers concluded at least 75% of human lifespan is determined by environmental and modifiable lifestyle factors. He also cited large-scale analysis led by Oxford Population Health using data from nearly 500,000 UK Biobank participants which found that environmental exposures and habits carry far greater weight in premature death and biological ageing than inherited genetics. The report’s recommendations include avoiding processed foods, abstaining entirely from alcohol, prioritising sleep, not eating after 6.30pm, and cultivating what it calls “a not-meat mindset.” On alcohol, it takes a position more forthright than current government guidance. “Alcohol is toxic, don’t drink it,” said Ball. “The report bravely says so — whereas the government is afraid to tell the public the truth.”

Re:Life?

By Kisai • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

That’s the point.

A lot of “fun” and “convenient” stuff comes at the cost of our health and we’ve known this for a century. Look up what “salt of saturn” is. It’s Lead Acetate. You know what forms that? Wine.

Alcohol has always been poison. Smoking anything (tobacco, cannabis, crack, meth, etc) Poison.

Meats… There is a reason why in various religions they say not to eat meat, because in the era’s they were written in, eating these animals were “unclean”. Birds have salmonella. Pigs have Trichinosis. Fish have worms. Cattle can have Trichinosis or E.Coli. Shellfish have Norovirus or Hepatitis A.

So nasty things have to be done to meats to kill these, which in turn means it’s kinda deadly to you if you consume it in large quantities.

Browning food (baking, frying, deep frying) makes them taste better, but it forms acrylamides, which are cancer causing. Likewise many food products from before the 80’s were made with transfat/saturated fats, not vegetable fats, which means if you consumed a lof of that before it was phased out (which phased out their long shelf lives too) you likely consumed a lot of carcinogens.

And how about sex? Don’t like condoms because it doesn’t feel as good? That’s how you get STD’s. STDS generally lead to cancer.

That is how you draw the line between Vices and how they shorten your life. Anything that tastes or feels good IS BAD FOR TOU.

Ironically the only vice that doesn’t cause an immediate penalty to your health is gambling/gachapon/lootbox crap. No this stuff causes mental health problems and feeds into addictions of the above. If you don’t have an addiction, then gambling doesn’t really affect you. You can just stop.

Oh fuck.

By Petersko • Score: 5, Funny Thread

The report’s recommendations include avoiding processed foods, abstaining entirely from alcohol, prioritising sleep, not eating after 6.30pm, and cultivating what it calls “a not-meat mindset.” On alcohol, it takes a position more forthright than current government guidance. “Alcohol is toxic, don’t drink it,” said Ball.

Let’s hope I make it through the night.

Re:should have been dead ten years ago.

By quintessencesluglord • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

What is the saying- man with no health problems, short life. man with health problem, long life?

Most healthy-ish people aren’t aware of the damage they do to their bodies until it is too late, whereas people with chronic conditions are more mindful of their health.

Especially for some careers, they aren’t designed with health in mind and falls into to the same personal blame for any shortcomings instead of the system that lead them there.

Austerity

By Petersko • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I don’t think a healthy life, in and of itself, is all that laudable a goal. I’m reminded of The Witches of Eastwick… “When I die, I want to be sick. Not healthy.” The question is, who benefits from the extended lifespan? Because it came at a cost. Opportunity cost… but a cost nonetheless.

Were I to live an austere life in perfect health, eschewing all of the wonderful but deleterious things life has to offer in favor of longevity, I doubt I would face my death without specific regret. Conversely, if I die in my early 70s of health issues stemming from questionable life choices, I’m pretty sure whatever regret I have would be abstract, and not even all that defendable. “Should have laid off the bacon and scotch… maybe… should I have? They were so good…”

I’m not suggesting people should be unmoderated hedonists. But I salt my cooking until I’m happy with the taste, I love coffee, I think beef tallow is underrated, and my smoker and grill are well loved.

Absolutely.

By Qbertino • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I did a diploma in performing arts in the the 90ies. The first half of my 20ies was dancing 5+ hours per weekday. I still benefit from that phase. As a teenager I was into climbing. I still have the shoulder muscles from that time, despite totally slacking on strength training. But no smoking, no drugs, no alcohol. And I have been dancing Argentine Tango for the last 18 years, 9 of which where an artsy minimalist lifestyle built around intensely dancing Tango 3+ times a week. My sleep schedule was as off as with my other thing, software development, but otherwise my health was awesome, physically and mentally. Intensely hugging hot ladies 3+ times a week for hours on end does wonders for a hetero-males well-being. I regularly get judged 10 years younger than I am.
Processed foods are organic as much as possible, I avoid junkfood 95% of the time and I’ve started cooking for myself 10 years ago. Huge impact.

I’ve since have taken Tango down a notch and picked up motorscooter/motorbike as means of travelling and getting around. Getting slightly overweight for the first time in my life. Not good, don’t like it. I’m roughly 10 years too late in picking up a daily excercise/yoga, cardio and strength schedule, a thing I definitely need to get going this year. Started hiking with my sweetheart, we want to pick up the pace and intensity of that to stay healthy in old age.

I keep telling my 28 year old daughter that she dare never not stop her daily yoga practice. I hope she can do that.

It’s this simple: Objectively the very best retirement plan is actively working on your health, strength, endurance and flexibility multiple times a week. Way more significant than being wealthy at old age.

I’d rather be top fit at 70 living off 700 Euros per month than overweight with two bipasses living off 2000.

AT&T Sues California In Bid To Stop Offering Traditional Phone Service

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Reuters:
AT&T on Wednesday filed suit (PDF) against California officials seeking a court order declaring it does not have to continue offering traditional copper wire phone service to new customers as it vowed to spend $19 billion on modern telecom services. California requires the U.S. wireless carrier to spend $1 billion annually to maintain a century-old telephone network that few use, AT&T said, saying the network now serves just 3% of households in AT&T’s California territory.

AT&T’s suit named the California Public Utilities Commission and the state attorney general. AT&T said it is committing to investing $19 billion in California as it works to connect more than 4 million additional households and businesses across California by 2030 and added IP-based networks are far more reliable and efficient. AT&T also Wednesday asked the Federal Communications Commission for permission to discontinue traditional phone service in parts of California where it has faster, more reliable service available. It also filed a petition with the FCC to declare that California’s rules that effectively require AT&T to power, repair and sell traditional phone service, even after the FCC has authorized the service to be phased out, are preempted by federal standards.

AT&T added that transitioning from copper will save an estimated 300 million kilowatt-hours annually by 2030 or the equivalent of eliminating emissions from 17 million gallons of gasoline. The company added that California has already suffered about 2,000 outages from copper thefts this year and it struggles to find replacement parts. The federal government and virtually all states where AT&T historically offered copper-wire service “have now eliminated outdated regulatory obstacles” allowing AT&T to begin powering down its old network and increasing its investments in modern communication technologies, the company said in its lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court in southern California.

Re:Win/win

By phantomfive • Score: 4, Informative Thread
You are full of hate, grasshoppa(657393).

AT&T morons

By kschendel • Score: 3 Thread

Instead of paying lawyers millions to pursue this lawsuit, could not they have put the money into converting that (as they claim) 7% or 3% or whatever TF they want to strand, into “modern” connectivity? Oh, wait, I’m sorry, that would require that AT&T actually do something constructive, not to mention something that would actually incur capital expenditures. Unlike paying lawyers.

POTS advantages

By Tom • Score: 3 Thread

AT&T added that transitioning from copper will save an estimated 300 million kilowatt-hours annually

Yepp, one of the reasons being that POTS will work even during power outages, as long as the central switches are powered. Your VoIP will be down if your house has no power. It probably is more efficient, but that “saving” is also simply shifting some of the power usage to consumers.

Thousands of Zillow Listings In Chicago Have Vanished

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Thousands of Chicago-area Zillow and Trulia listings disappeared after Midwest Real Estate Data cut off Zillow’s access to its feed, “in the latest escalation of a legal battle with Lisle-based Midwest Real Estate Data (MRED),” reports the Chicago Sun-Times. “The fight is over MRED’s private listing network, where homes for sale are shared among real estate professionals. And MRED followed through on a threat to cut Zillow’s access to its listing data feed.” From the report:
There were nearly 5,000 Chicago homes listed on Zillow Tuesday, but as of Wednesday afternoon, that number plummeted to about 1,700. Meanwhile, other listing sites like Redfin and Realtor.com show about 5,000 to 8,000 listings in Chicago. MRED manages listings — submitted by brokers — throughout Illinois, as well as parts of Wisconsin and Indiana. The regional multiple listing service has more than 43,000 members and processed more than 264,000 listings worth $43 billion in 2025. The loss of listings on Zillow’s websites have made a behind-the-scenes real estate industry fight public. And it now hinders some consumers in their search to buy a home, while also limiting the marketing opportunity for sellers.
The legal fight is basically over who gets to control how home listings are marketed and displayed online.
Zillow recently adopted a rule saying that if a home is marketed privately, such as behind a paywall, login, or private listing network, it should not also appear on Zillow. The policy, the real estate marketplace says, is meant to discourage “pocket listings,” preserve transparency, and make sure buyers can see the full market.

MRED sees it differently. It expanded its private listing network and partnered with Compass, which wants to give sellers more control over whether their homes are broadly publicized or marketed privately first. MRED argues that Zillow is violating MLS rules and licensing agreements by refusing to display certain listings, including private Compass listings. Consumers are now caught in the middle…

Re: Having your cake and eating it too

By hwihyw • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

You shouldn’t get to list a home “privately” to limit competition while still demanding access to Zillow’s massive public traffic.
But that is exactly the hustle MRED and Compass are pulling. They want to hide listings in their “private network” of 43,000 insiders so they can keep transactions “in-house” and represent both the buyer and the sellerâ"pocketing both sides of the commission. Yet, they still expect public portals to advertise them.
Zillow’s rule is basic common sense: if you want to hide a listing from the open market, you don’t get to use the open market’s biggest megaphone to do it. MRED retaliating by cutting Zillow’s access and plummeting Chicago listings from 5,000 to 1,700 isn’t about “seller choice.” It’s a coordinated boycott designed to force buyers back into a closed, high-commission gatekeeper system.

Re: Having your cake and eating it too

By Smidge204 • Score: 5, Informative Thread

> If I want to sell my house, why shouldn’t I be able to sell it and advertise it how I want to?

You can. Nobody is saying you can’t. That’s not the problem.

  > Why *shouldn’t* I be able to access Zillow’s advertising service and sell my house privately?

I think you’re conflating the word “private” here. This isn’t about you listing your home as a “privately” as a private individual, it’ about MRED maintaining “private” (e.g. exclusive) access to that listing. MRED and Compass are monopolizing the rights to broker your property’s sale but still want Zillow to do the advertising for them.

  > Selling and advertising are two different things, there is no ethical reason to tie them together.

Correct, but Amazon should not expect eBay to show Amazon store page results when you search for things on eBay. Amazon maintains a walled garden of sellers and you must go through Amazon as an intermediary to buy and sell anything there. You want to list your stuff for sale on Amazon but still want eBay users to see it… why should eBay accommodate that bullshit?

MRED wants access to Zillow’s users while simultaneously cutting independent brokers out of the business, and Zillow justifiably has a problem with that.
=Smidge=

Re: Having your cake and eating it too

By SeaFox • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Why *shouldn’t* I be able to access Zillow’s advertising service and sell my house privately?

Because it’s not your decision. Zillow is a private company and they can choose to exclude listings that are not available on the open market if they want to. Really… shades of “demanding freedom of speech on non-public forums” here.

MRED could make their own real estate search and advertising site and only show their “in-network” properties — but they don’t want to do that because, besides the actual expense of building and running their own site, they don’t have the brand recognition that Zillow has. They just want to piggyback off an existing popular site.

Re: Having your cake and eating it too

By SeaFox • Score: 4, Informative Thread

If I want Zillow to list my house, I can list with Zillow and not with MRED. If I think MRED is a better deal and will get me a buyer sooner, I can list with them.

Okay, but it sounds like you want to use MRED’s service (where a potential buyer has to buy with a MRED agent — because you are selling with an MRED agent) and still be advertised on Zillow. Zillow doesn’t want to list homes that have that sort of buyer restriction on them.They want a buyer to be free to use any realtor for their side of transaction. This isn’t an ethical dilemma, it’s a business decision. Zillow is saying if MRED wants a website where they can list homes for their “insiders” scheme they need to make their own site and not use the Zillow brand as essentially a private advertising platform.

Is this the start of a redlining attempt?

By Calibax • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Undoubtedly MRED and Compass are trying to double dip on commissions. But having a private, preferred network of 43,000 subscribers could easily be the beginning of redlining by offering some listings only to clients in “preferred” areas, and the other listings not in these areas to the general public.

Vivaldi 8.0 Arrives With ‘Most Significant Design Overhaul’ In Browser’s History

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Vivaldi 8.0 is being pitched as the browser’s "most significant design overhaul” yet, featuring a new unified, edge-to-edge interface, six preset layouts, and deeper customization across tabs, toolbars, panels, and themes. The company is also taking a swipe at rivals chasing questionable AI features. Neowin reports:
After updating to version 8.0, Vivaldi will present you with the ability to select one of the six pre-built styles. You can select a minimal edge-to-edge theme, one with the UI fully hidden for focused work, or a power user variant with everything on the screen. The update comes with a built-in collection theme, and users are free to select one of over 7,000 community themes available on the official website.

Vivaldi says that while other browsers were busy adding questionable AI features, it focused on “a foundation that no other browser can match” with flexible tab management, built-in productivity tools, and advanced customization. At the same time, Vivaldi does not force the new design onto its users, so those who prefer the previous user interface can go back to it at any moment in settings.
“With 8.0, we have done something we have been working toward for a long time: we have given the browser itself a visual system worthy of everything it can do,” says Vivaldi’s CEO and co-founder, Jon Stephenson von Tetzchner. “With this update Vivaldi feels like one considered, coherent tool.”
You can download Vivaldi 8.0 and view the changelog at their respective links.

No uBlock Origin, Chromium manifest v3

By caseih • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

While they are doing creative things with the UI (but not really to my taste), at the end of the day it’s just another Chrome browser, so no manifest v2 support and no uBlock Origin. While Vivaldi puts in their own ad blocker safety system, it’s nowhere near as good as uBlock Origin. I don’t understand why Vivaldi devs don’t patch manifest v2 back in. Would be a huge selling point.

So Firefox remains the only game in town for safe web browsing. I keep Vivaldi around for the odd site that won’t work in Firefox, but it’s definitely not my daily driver.

Just Another Chromium Reskin.

By robbak • Score: 4 Thread

I’m sure they are adding a bunch of other stuff, but at it’s heart, it’s just chromium.

Really wish we had a more healthy market for browser engines.

Trump Calls Off AI Executive Order Over Concern It Could Weaken US Tech Edge

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Trump called off a planned AI executive order just hours before a signing ceremony because he said he was worried the framework could slow America’s lead over China. “We’re leading China, we’re leading everybody, and I don’t want to do anything that’s going to get in the way of that lead,” Trump told reporters. The Associated Press reports:
The order would have established a framework for the government to vet the national security risks of the most advanced AI systems before their public release, according to a person familiar with the White House’s deliberations with the tech industry but not authorized to speak about it publicly. The directive was being characterized as a voluntary collaboration with participating U.S.-based tech companies, including Anthropic, OpenAI and Google, the person said.

There are competing factions within the administration, said Serena Booth, a computer science professor at Brown University and former AI policy fellow in a Democratic-led Senate committee. “We do see this kind of public fighting,” she said. "‘We will release an executive order. No, we won’t. We’re going to sign it this afternoon. Oh, the signing is canceled.’ I think this whiplash is because we’re seeing these fractures.’"

Some of those divides are balancing what Booth said is a “reasonable idea” to test the most capable AI models before their public release, with a concern that government scrutiny, if it takes too long, could burden AI developers. “It does come at a potential very large cost to innovation and speed of development,” she said. “There is, I think, a real risk here and I do see both sides.” […]

“They don’t want to do it because it’s politically risky in a million different ways,” said Dean Ball, now at the Foundation for American Innovation. Ball said he would welcome an executive order that would get those companies working more closely with the government on cybersecurity but “ultimately, I’m fine with them taking time to get this right.”

Translation

By drinkypoo • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Trump wanted to control the AI market, but the AI market offered him enough bribe money to control him.

How about passing a law instead of EO?

By quax • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

EO after EO who needs laws if you can just rule by fiat? Donnie boy truly reigns like a monarch.

He does that despite the GOP controlling both houses. It’s lazy and won’t last longer than the current administration.

Trump coin spike

By r1348 • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

https://www.coinbase.com/it/pr…

Trump coin value spiked between signing the executive order and recalling it. Lots of buyers.
I’m sure it’s all a coincidence.

Re:How about passing a law instead of EO?

By thegarbz • Score: 5, Informative Thread

False. W Bush II had less EOs than W Bush I.
Obama did tick up in his first time, but Obama II had less than W Bush I.
Both Obamas had less than both W Bushes.

Then Trump attempted to match Jimmy Carter’s insanely high number, but only became the biggest abuser but only became the worst president in 40 years (what a loser, beaten by a Democrat at ruling by decree)

Then Biden dropped down to a number between Obama II and W Bush I bringing us back to reasonable levels. It was such a lovely sleepy time.

Then Trump WENT ABSOLUTELY FUCKING INSANE and blasted through his previous 4 year number in under a year very much putting him on target to sign more EOs than Truman did nearly a century ago.

No each admiration doesn’t get worse. They flip back and forth having hit a number not too different from their past numbers (for that political party) with the Democrats slightly better than the republicans on average over the past 40 years, keeping a trend that was perfectly normal right until King Trump II took office last year.

He absolutely does not

By rsilvergun • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Trump does one of two things. In this case he was most likely just soliciting a bribe. He probably put some things in the order he knew some of the people with money didn’t like and sat back and waited until they opened their checkbooks.

But the other thing he does is push the absolute limits of what he can get away with, go past those limits, get his hand slapped just a tiny bit by the court and then back off a little bit after establishing a new normal where he can commit more crimes and we all just shrug it off because he’s making America great again.

So somebody draws the line, he doesn’t just step over it he gets in his golf cart and drives a quarter mile over it then the courts yell at him and he backs his golf cart up a few hundred feet but he is still over the line.

Flipper One Could Be the Ultimate Linux Cyberdeck

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
BrianFagioli writes:
Flipper Devices has finally revealed Flipper One, a Linux-powered cyberdeck that sounds less like a gadget and more like an attempt to rebuild portable ARM computing from the ground up. Unlike Flipper Zero, which focuses on offline protocols like RFID and Sub-1 GHz radio, Flipper One is all about networking, modular hardware, SDR experimentation, local AI, and upstream Linux kernel support. The company says it wants to build “the most open and best-documented ARM computer in the world,” complete with zero vendor BSP dependency and as few binary blobs as possible. That alone is enough to get Linux folks paying attention.

The hardware itself is loaded with nerd bait: dual Gigabit Ethernet, Wi-Fi 6E, M.2 expansion for SSDs and 5G modems, GPIO add-ons, HDMI 2.1, and a dual-processor architecture pairing a Rockchip RK3576 with a Raspberry Pi RP2350 microcontroller. Flipper Devices is even developing its own small-screen Linux UI framework because squeezing KDE onto tiny touchscreens is miserable. The company openly admits the project is financially and technically terrifying, which honestly makes this announcement feel more believable than most startup hardware pitches. Whether Flipper One succeeds or not, it is one of the most ambitious Linux hardware projects in years.

Support the right …

By PPH • Score: 5, Funny Thread

… to bear ARMs!

Cost

By machineghost • Score: 3 Thread

Neither the summary nor the article said anything about price. I guess it’s not announced, but Gemini thinks:

However, the target price for the base configuration is expected to be less than ($350), though analysts and community members project it could fall anywhere between ($300) and ($500).

Less than a Steam Deck!

Unlike Flipper Zero

By Himmy32 • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

“Unlike Flipper Zero” is a pretty big understatement, they feel like very different classes of devices. The open everything dual ARM machine + RP2350 microcontroller with GPIO in a battery powered portable form factor very interesting. Guessing there’s going to be a price premium for this type of swiss army knife, but I think they proved with the Zero that they can deliver to unique markets like this.

I’ll say that I’m interested, where I had little interest in the Zero. It’s different than the rest of my collection random of project hardware (Arduinos, ESP32s, and Pis). An all-in-one project toy that fits in a pocket seems pretty nifty.

… Or it could not.

By greytree • Score: 3 Thread
Flipper One Could Be the Ultimate Linux Cyberdeck … Or it could not.

An advertisement would blindly scream the former.

A piece of fact-based journalism would point out the latter.

How many seconds of battery life?

By stevenm86 • Score: 3 Thread
I see a ton of hardware packed in there. An SoC, a bunch of radios, ethernet, wifi, reasonably high-speed blocks like HDMI, etc. The power budget compared to F0 will be very significantly higher. Where will it come from?

US To Award $2 Billion To Quantum Companies, Take Equity Stakes

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from the Quantum Insider:
The Trump administration is preparing a new round of industrial policy aimed at quantum computing, with roughly $2 billion in grants expected to go to nine companies developing quantum hardware and related technologies. According to Reuters, citing a Wall Street Journal report, the U.S. Department of Commerce plans to distribute the funding through deals that also give the federal government equity stakes in the companies receiving the awards. The approach would expand Washington’s increasingly direct involvement in sectors viewed as strategically important to national security, advanced manufacturing and competition with China.

Reuters reported that IBM is expected to receive the largest share of the package at about $1 billion. Semiconductor manufacturer GlobalFoundries is slated to receive approximately $375 million, according to the report. Other recipients are expected to include D-Wave Quantum, Rigetti Computing, Quantinuum and Infleqtion, with each company potentially receiving around $100 million, Reuters reported. Australian quantum startup Diraq could receive about $38 million, according to the Wall Street Journal report cited by Reuters.
Fast Company notes in its reporting that IBM will invest the funds it receives into a new IBM company called Anderon. It will also match the grant with another $1 billion in cash.

“Anderon will operate as a state-of-the-art 300-millimeter quantum wafer foundry,” IBM stated in an announcement. “It will help the nation solidify its leadership at the center of a thriving new quantum industry that is estimated to generate up to $850 billion in economic value by 2040 and spur American economic growth while also bolstering national security.”

Quantum computing stocks soared after the news. As of publication, IBM is up about 9.7%, D-Wave is up about 28.1%, and Rigetti is up about 26.7%. Meanwhile, Global Foundries rose about 13.8% and Infleqtion jumped about 30.9%.

And republicans…

By Puls4r • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Say nothing as their “small government” party has our Federal Government purchasing private companies that compete with other private companies. Certainly won’t be a conflict of interest there. Where are the screams of communism?

Do we know …

By PPH • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

… what sorts of entanglements such funds entail?

just once

By toxonix • Score: 3 Thread

Can’t the news story come out AFTER I purchase the stock. I should already have owned shares in GF already. This is probably just an insider trading deal. If the Trump admin’s back-office finance team purchases a ton of undervalued stocks, and then Trump hands the companies behind those tickers a few billion in public money, is it a crime?
It’s a crime. As is giving public money to people who tried to overthrow the government. But that’s neither here nor there.

Re:And republicans…

By ClickOnThis • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

.... NEITHER party is about anything but getting more power or control for themselves and playing favorites with private sector businesses they have personal reasons to favor.

The current context is the federal government buying shares in companies. Both parties have supported such moves, but I daresay for different reasons.

The first Obama administration, for example, took a position in Detroit auto-makers to keep the industry afloat. Arguably it made sense, because it was a large industry that employed lots of people. And the federal government divested itself of its positions entirely by late 2013.

Now for the present day. I don’t need convincing that quantum computing has enormous strategic interest to the USA. The federal government should support domestic development of it. But take an equity stake in the industry? I’m not sure that’s necessary. Better to fund research grants and let companies bid on contracts.

Spotify Will Start Reserving Concert Tickets For Fans

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Spotify is launching “Reserved,” a new feature that will set aside concert tickets for Premium subscribers it identifies as an artist’s most dedicated fans based on streams, shares, and other activity. “Getting concert tickets today can feel like a race you’re set up to lose,” Spotify wrote in a post on Thursday. “You show up at the right time, refresh endlessly, and still miss out. Too often, the experience is stressful, unpredictable, and disconnected from what should matter most: whether real fans actually get tickets. We think there’s a better way.” From the Hollywood Reporter:
Spotify said that starting in the U.S. this summer, select artists will be able to use Reserved to set aside tickets for fans on the platform. The platform has partnered with Live Nation on the program as part of a multiyear agreement. The platform will use streams, shares and other types of activity to “identify an artist’s most dedicated fans and hold two tour tickets for them.”

Fans selected through Reserved will get up to two tickets, and they’ll have a day-long window to make a ticket purchase if selected. Spotify didn’t give any details on what artists will work with the streaming service for the new feature, or how many tickets artists would set aside with Reserved, though the service acknowledged “there will be significantly more superfans than there are seats available on a tour, so not every fan will receive an offer.”

Oh great, another presale

By rezachi • Score: 3, Insightful Thread
I’ve done enough presales to realize that unless they find a way to keep the scalpers and bots out it will be largely useless.

fan

By gary s • Score: 3 Thread
ANd how much does it cost in fee’s to be a fan?

Waymo Pauses Atlanta Service As Its Robotaxis Keep Driving Into Floods

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Waymo has paused service in Atlanta after one of its driverless cars entered a flooded street and got stuck. It follows a similar pause in San Antonio that prompted a recent software recall (PDF) over flood avoidance. TechCrunch reports:
Waymo admitted that it hadn’t finished developing a “final remedy” for avoiding flooded areas when it issued its software recall last week. Instead, the company said that it shipped an update to its fleet that placed “restrictions at times and in locations where there is an elevated risk of encountering a flooded, higher-speed roadway,” according to documents released by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA).

But even those precautions apparently were not enough to stop the Waymo robotaxi from entering the flooded intersection in Atlanta. Waymo told TechCrunch on Thursday that the storm in Atlanta produced so much rainfall that flooding was happening before the National Weather Service had issued a flash flood warning, watch, or advisory. The company said its fleet those alerts are part of a larger set of signals it relies on to prepare the vehicles for poor weather.

Can’t wait for robotaxi bankruptcy

By dskoll • Score: 3, Interesting Thread

AI is bad enough, but these robotaxis are a scourge on society. They add to traffic, take away transit ridership, and don’t even give humans a job, even a gig job.

Humans drive into floods, too

By timholman • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

In Arizona, the police routinely have to rescue people who drive around roadblocks into flooded arroyos and wind up with their vehicles floating down the wash. It got so bad while I lived there that the city had to start charging people a fee for their rescue to curb the stupidity.

A decade from now, I have no doubt that the authorities will still have to rescue drivers in flooded roadways. I am also certain that Waymo vehicles will have stopped making that mistake years earlier. We can fix autonomous vehicles. We can’t fix humans. I’ll take the Waymo, thank you.

Artificial stupidity

By sjames • Score: 3 Thread

They’re called AI, but in Arizona, there is a law that if you drive into water you will be billed for your rescue. It’s known as the “stupid driver law”.

So apparently the Waymo is driven by Artificial Stupidity.

Microsoft Hires Analyst With Influential Video Game Blog To Fix Xbox

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Microsoft has hired games analyst and investor Matthew Ball as Xbox’s new chief strategy officer. With a long track record of analyzing the video game market and industry’s biggest shifts, Ball’s background could help Xbox rethink its hardware and console strategy at a moment when competition is tougher than ever. Engadget reports:
Ball is a venture capitalist and tech industry consultant with a well-documented history of analyzing emerging digital economies and the video game market. He was most recently the CEO and founder of Epyllion, an advisory firm and digital production house that also runs a large-scale metaverse investment fund, and he publishes regular breakdowns of the industry’s biggest players and trends, including an annual State of Gaming report. Ball is the author of The Metaverse, a book beloved by Tim Sweeney, Mark Zuckerberg, Karlie Kloss and, not awkwardly at all, former Xbox head Phil Spencer.

So… metaverse…

By Puls4r • Score: 5, Funny Thread
So Microsoft has hired on a guy who bought into the Metaverse stupidity.... and they expect him to lead their Xbox resurgence.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Let’s make gaming like work..

By illafam • Score: 3, Insightful Thread
Last time I powered on my Xbox I used my kids controller.. to continue I needed to update the firmware of the controller.. to do that I needed to login into their account, to do that I needed to 2FA from their iPad.. to do that I had to run around the house to find the iPad, then I had to charge their iPad.. once that was done I needed to update the console for security updates.. once that was done I had to install the game updates.. At some point I had to login to my phone and find the family options and modify some settings as it thought I was a child⦠etc etc. I’m sure there was some prompts about renewing my monthly subscription as well, now it’s a business decision.. It was time for dinner and I didn’t get to play the game, next time I just turned on the GameCube.

I’ve seen some of Epyllion’s analysis

By Gideon Fubar • Score: 3 Thread

It’s oriented around the unstated belief that only the triple A games industry represents legitimate business, and tracks a bunch of metrics in a way that is so skewed it almost seems like they have an axe to grind.

Ball’s approach is largely top down and only in touch with a series of market sanitized adages, so I’m not sure how he’s going to deal with the problem of Microsoft largely being top down and only in touch with a series of market sanitized adages.

OpenAI Claims It Solved an 80-Year-Old Math Problem

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from TechCrunch:
OpenAI claims its new reasoning model has produced an original mathematical proof disproving a famous unsolved conjecture in geometry, which was first posed by Paul Erdos in 1946. If this sounds familiar to you, it’s because this isn’t the first time OpenAI has made such a bold claim. Seven months ago, the AI giant’s former VP Kevin Weil posted on X: “GPT-5 found solutions to 10 (!) previously unsolved Erds problems and made progress on 11 others.”

It turns out, GPT-5 didn’t actually solve those problems; it just found solutions that already existed in the literature. Taunts from rivals like Yann LeCun and Google DeepMind CEO Demis Hassabis followed, and Weil promptly took down his premature post. Today, at least, it seems OpenAI didn’t make the same mistake twice. Alongside the announcement, the company published companion remarks (PDF) in support of the disproof from mathematicians like Noga Alon, Melanie Wood, and Thomas Bloom, who maintains the Erdos Problems website, and previously called Weil’s post “a dramatic misrepresentation.”

[…] The proof, per OpenAI, came from a new general-purpose reasoning model, not a system specifically designed to solve math problems or even this problem in particular. OpenAI says this is significant because it means AI systems are now more capable of holding together long, difficult chains of reasoning and connecting ideas across fields in ways researchers may not have previously explored. That has implications for biology, physics, engineering, and medicine.

Mathematician commentary included

By phantomfive • Score: 5, Informative Thread
Here is the paper. It has some really nice commentary from mathematicians at the bottom. I recommend reading (or at least skimming) it. It’s not clear exactly what the AI did, since it was “human-digested, somewhat simplified, and somewhat generalized.” This quote from Melanie Matchett Wood is clarifying:

“One other concern that directly arises in this development is that there is a history of closely related ideas in the literature,.. which are not appropriately referenced in Chat GPT’s paper. If a human came up with this argument and didn’t cite such previous work, we would assume that they were unfamiliar with the previous work and came up with the ideas independently, since our professional norms require us to cite previous work whose ideas influenced our work. On the other hand, Chat GPT is in some sense “familiar” with all the previous work.”

Re:Mathematician commentary included

By machineghost • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

I don’t think anyone is contesting that. What they are contesting is a sociopath’s claim that his tool solved something humans couldn’t … when really 95+% of what it did was just leverage existing human knowledge.

Caveat: I’m not a mathematician and I didn’t read the paper … but Sam Altman is VERY well known for lying (constantly), so everything he says should be taken with multiple bags of salt.

Re:Mathematician commentary included

By Inglix the Mad • Score: 4, Informative Thread

To be fair, even just a tool that can search the literature for solutions of similar problems is extremely useful.

The problem for all the AI companies is that means they’ve built a discount version of the Library Computer Access Retrieval System (LCARS) with questionable data. That is not AGI. That is not intelligence at all. That is a search engine with a different, many times using a terrible, interface.

That tool, while useful in some ways, is nowhere near worth the billions they’ve burned selling it as the tool to do everything. That means Sam, Dario, Elon, and the rest spent the GDP of several countries to build a fancier Wikipedia.

Re:Mathematician commentary included

By machineghost • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Right, so you could make a claim like “all mathematicians leveraged (say) 95% prior knowledge”. If OpenAI similarly leveraged 95%, and “discovered” the rest, it’d be (at least somewhat) legitimate to say “OpenAI invented a new theorem”.

But, if OpenAI actually leveraged 99.9% existing knowledge (remember, my post said "“95+%"), then it’s NOT fair to compare it to a human discovery. If a company claims as much, they’re dishonestly promoting their product.

Again, I’m not a mathematician, and I did not read the paper. But given Altman’s history of deception, I think any disinterested observer should lean towards assuming that he is falsely promoting the competency of his product, before assuming he’s invented a machine that can out-invent humans.

Re:Mathematician commentary included

By phantomfive • Score: 4, Informative Thread
You can look, they had several mathematicians review the proof (scroll down): https://cdn.openai.com/pdf/74c…

They mostly use plain English, so their comments are very helpful.

SpaceX Reveals Its Finances For the First Time

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
SpaceX has revealed its financials for the first time as it prepares for a potentially massive IPO. The New York Times reports:
SpaceX’s revenue soared to $18.7 billion in 2025, up 33 percent from a year earlier, the company disclosed in a filing required of firms that are seeking to go public. In the first three months of this year, revenue rose to $4.7 billion from $4.1 billion in the same period a year ago. But the company lost more than $4.9 billion last year, compared with a $791 million profit in 2024, as capital expenditures nearly doubled to $20.7 billion from heavy spending on artificial intelligence development. In the first three months of this year, SpaceX lost almost as much money as all of 2025, recording a $4.3 billion loss.

Re:No longer just SpaceX

By fuzzyfuzzyfungus • Score: 5, Informative Thread
Anyone who is hoping to avoid Musk’s dumber ideas should probably just stay the hell away. Even by the standards of the classic “oh, there’s actual-votes stock and peon stock; guess which kind we sold during the IPO” stuff; spacex is pushing things. The boy-king of mars holds 85% of the voting power; shareholders are required to waive the right to jury trial or class action and submit to arbitration only, only class B shareholders(mostly Musk) can remove the chairman of the board, CEO, or CTO; and similar enthusiastic use of Texas’ provisions for ‘controlled companies’ that really don’t want to take any pesky outside input.

Putting your money on that is pretty much entirely just making a bet on whether you think the dictator for life will make line go up or not; not even pretending to be analogous to an ownership stake.

Re:Investing = Polymarket betting

By AleRunner • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Unfortunately not. The whole point of this story is that SpaceX looks like a reasonably sure bet on space and the military industrial complex (which wants/needs SpaceX’s launch capability). However, in fact it’s a bet on Elon Musk’s ability to deliver AI this time, having failed already in Tesla and OpenAI. He’s seemingly let his ego get ahead of himself and forgotten that Tesla, SpaceX and his other success were due to good engineers.

Re:Investing = Polymarket betting

By r1348 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Yes, because it provides launch to orbit capabilities at a fraction of the cost of what NASA ever managed to achieve.
When it comes to its space industry business alone, SpaceX is a big win for the American public, however it should be mandated to split its AI business off as it’s basically parasiting those profits and turning them into a loss.

Index and hedge funds

By rsilvergun • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
The IPO is so huge that if you are a institutional investor with one of those funds that buy stocks for people to invest in then you have to buy SpaceX. It’s going to be something like 7% of NASDAQ. You can’t afford for that to fail it would take down your other investments with it. It is classic too big to fail bullshit. It basically forces every single institutional investor to buy into it. The rule changes also Force those investors into it.

This also means that if you’re buying into supposably safe index or hedge funds you’re now at risk because all of NASDAQ is at risk. This basically fucks everything up. It’s too big of a scam for our economy to reliably absorb. Ordinarily the government would step in and block this shit because of the damage it would do to The wider economy. I don’t think it takes a genius to figure out why that’s not happening.

Re:Once again Patrick Boyle on YouTube covered thi

By aaarrrgggh • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

It is a scam, but the launch and Starlink portions aren’t it. Launches can easily expand 10x, and Starlink has huge opportunities in backup service for residential and business, not to mention connected vehicles. Think of Starlink as an alternative to mobile phones.

NASA Expects Chinese Crewed Mission Around the Moon In 2027

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman says he expects China to fly taikonauts around the moon in 2027, “ratcheting up perceptions of a space race between China and the United States,” reports SpaceNews. He is using that prospect to argue for a revamped Artemis strategy and an accelerated path toward a U.S. lunar return. From the report:
“The next time the world tunes in to watch astronauts fly around the moon, which will likely be sometime in 2027, they will be taikonauts, and America will no longer be the exclusive power to send humans into the lunar environment,” he said. While Isaacman has frequently discussed a race with China to be the next to land humans on the moon, this was one of the first times he predicted a 2027 Chinese crewed circumlunar mission. He repeated the comments later in the day at an industry reception.

China has not publicly announced plans for such a mission, which, as Isaacman described it, would likely be similar to NASA’s Artemis 2 mission in April. There have been rumors of a mission along those lines, though, and an expectation of a roadmap of missions leading to a Chinese crewed landing by the end of the decade. So far, all the crewed missions to fly around, orbit or land on the moon have been flown by NASA: nine Apollo missions from 1968 to 1972 and Artemis 2. All the astronauts on those missions have been Americans except for Canadian Space Agency astronaut Jeremy Hansen on Artemis 2.

Isaacman has used the threat that China could land astronauts on the moon before NASA returns there as a rationale for revamping the Artemis lunar exploration program. In February, he announced that Artemis 3, which was to be a lunar landing attempt in 2028, will instead be a test flight in low Earth orbit in 2027, followed by a landing on Artemis 4 in 2028. In March, he changed other elements of Artemis at the agency’s Ignition event, including effectively canceling the lunar Gateway to focus resources instead on a lunar base, while calling for a much higher cadence of robotic lander missions.

Good for them

By 93 Escort Wagon • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

The more the merrier, I say… at least in this context.

Lets Race!

By Morromist • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

US: Lets have an exciting space race! We’re already been there and we’ve been trying to go back for like 20 years, so we’re way ahead, but whatever, lets do it! Come ON! I’ll bet you’re going to race us like crazy. Oh BOY I’m excited.

China: Uh. I’m busy taking over all the parts of the world economy you don’t seem to want to do anymore. Huh. So you’re just not making ram for regular consumers anymore? Fine, I’ll build another bunch of factories.

US: We want this to be more dramatic. Come on, it was so much fun beating the russians in the 1960s! GOD WE’RE IN SO MUCH DEBT IT TINGLES!

China:

US: HELLO? ARE YOU THERE? Ok, I’m going to start the race in 3… 2… 1… GOOoooooooooooooooooooooooooooo.......!

Re:Lets Race!

By AmiMoJo • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

The Chinese government is doing basically what the US government did back in the 1960s. Set a goal, make it happen, fund it properly. Gives private companies the confidence to invest in space, even if they aren’t directly involved with government projects.

Except they also do it for stuff like electric vehicles and battery technology, renewable energy, railways, semiconductor manufacturing, steel production, and anything else they feel is strategically important to their economy.

Their goal is “before 2030”, so 2029 at the latest, and they are on track for that. They either have or are at the prototype stage with everything they need. Their mission is not over ambitious either, it’s a medium size lander and proven technologies. Blue Origin is also going with a reasonably conservative lander, but Starship is a much greater risk.

Colossal Biosciences Is Growing Chickens In a 3D-Printed Artificial Eggshell

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot
Colossal Biosciences says it has grown chickens inside 3D-printed artificial eggshells. “The company says the egg technology could help conserve at-risk bird species,” reports MIT Technology. “It could also play a role in a project to re-create the extinct giant moa, a flightless 12-foot-tall bird that once lived in New Zealand and laid four-liter eggs, larger than those of any living bird.” From the report:
The biotech company today claimed it has developed a “fully artificial egg” as part of its effort to resurrect extinct avian species, including birds like the dodo and the giant moa. But “artificial eggshell” would probably be a better description for the invention. It’s an oval-shaped printed lattice, coated inside with a special silicone-based membrane that lets in oxygen, just as a real eggshell does. To generate birds, Colossal took recently laid chicken eggs and carefully poured their contents into the artificial shells, where they continued growing. A window on top lets researchers peek inside. “To see them all moving around in their artificial eggs was absolutely mind blowing,” says Andrew Pask, the company’s chief biology officer. “You really feel you can grow life outside of the womb.”

[…] The work on the artificial eggshell was carried out in Dallas by Colossal’s exogenous development team, or Exo Dev. That group is also trying to develop artificial wombs for mammals, starting with marsupials. “We’re looking at every single facet of what’s happening during a mammalian pregnancy to unpack exactly how we then go about recapitulating that,” says Pask. For that team, an artificial eggshell is a relatively quick and easy technical win. That’s because chickens are already an example of ex utero development. After an egg is laid, a small embryo sitting on top of the yolk starts growing, drawing nutrients from the yolk, the white, and even the shell, which provides calcium. (Colossal says it has to add ground-up calcium to the artificial eggs.)

In order to create a moa, Colossal will have to genetically alter another type of bird, changing potentially thousands of DNA letters. But so far, chickens are the only bird species that can be genetically engineered. And that’s via a tricky process of editing stem cells that produce egg and sperm. Scientists have to add or delete DNA letters from these cells and then inject them back into an egg. The resulting bird will carry the genetic changes in its gonads — and then be able to pass them on. Pask says Colossal’s idea is that it could modify avian stem cells enough to produce moa-like sperm or eggs. But then you might have the odd situation of a chicken laying an egg with a moa embryo inside it. “You would have chickens making moa egg and moa sperm. But it’s still a chicken egg,” he says.

These are the same braggarts

By taustin • Score: 3 Thread

who pretend they’ve resurrected the dire wolf. Not sure I take their claims 100% seriously.

Artificial wombs are coming

By LoadLin • Score: 3 Thread

I know that’s a hell of difference.

An order of magnitude at least.

But it’s matter of time they do a similar concept for mammals, building artificial wombs instead of artificial eggshells.

And then, use it for humans will be only a moral issue, not a technical one.