Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Microsoft, Google, Amazon, Meta and Oracle Expect a Negative Cash Flow of $125 Billion Next Year
  2. Prime Minister Leaves Door Open For Reviewing Policy of No Nuclear Weapons in Japan
  3. Before and After Views of SpaceX Rocket’s Moon Crash
  4. NASA Figured Out How To Keep Its 48-Year-Old Voyager 2 Probe Running For Yet Another Year
  5. Woman Pulled From Car at Gunpoint By Police After Mistaken Flock Alert - Twice
  6. Trump Administration To Pay German Firm $1.2 Billion To Halt US Wind Projects
  7. Virginia Governor To Intervene In Dominion-NextEra Merger
  8. Water Utilities Group Partners With DEF CON Offshoot For Water Watch Center
  9. Kalshi and Polymarket Bets On Clinical Trials Criticized As ‘Ghastly’
  10. ‘Asimov Was Right’ About Rules For Robots, Says Ex-US Cyber Director
  11. Framework Notifies ‘All Customers’ of a Data Breach Via Compromised Metabase BI Service
  12. Suno Says It Will Start Watermarking Songs
  13. ByteDance Is Training a 10-Trillion-Parameter Model To Chase the Frontier
  14. Trump Orders New 15% Tariff On Key Material For Solar Panels, Microchips
  15. AMD Buys AI Chip Startup Taalas That Hardwires AI Models Into Its Silicon

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Microsoft, Google, Amazon, Meta and Oracle Expect a Negative Cash Flow of $125 Billion Next Year

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
The Washington Post shared surprising news this week about five top AI companies.

Microsoft, Google, Amazon, Meta and Oracle “are spending so much on developing AI and delivering it to customers that they’re expected to bleed cash in the coming year, according to a Washington Post analysis of data compiled by S&P Global Market Intelligence.”
Free cash flow, which measures the cash left over after paying expenses and AI infrastructure costs, is now expected to shrink to almost nothing for the five companies combined in 2026, and decline again to negative $125 billion the following year… AI spending by Amazon and Google pushed the companies to an ignominious milestone: They lost more cash in the past three months than any other large U.S. companies, according to S&P Global data. Investment analysts expect Elon Musk’s SpaceX to show even worse cash bleeding this week.

Prime Minister Leaves Door Open For Reviewing Policy of No Nuclear Weapons in Japan

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
At a Hiroshima memorial ceremony, Japan’s prime minister said the country “maintains” its three long-standing non-nuclear principles, reports UPI.

But the prime minister “stopped short of promising that the policy would remain unchanged, fueling speculation that her government could review a longstanding ban on allowing nuclear weapons into the country.”
[Prime Minister Sanae] Takaichi made the remarks Thursday at the Hiroshima Peace Memorial Ceremony marking the 81st anniversary of the U.S. atomic bombing of the city… Unlike previous prime ministers who pledged that Japan would “continue to uphold” the principles, Takaichi described the government’s current position without making an explicit commitment about the future [only saying that Japan has “a mission to continue efforts toward realizing a world without nuclear weapon…”] The wording has drawn attention because her government plans to revise Japan’s three key national security documents by the end of the year. At a news conference after the ceremony, Takaichi again said the government “maintains the Three Non-Nuclear Principles as a matter of policy.” Asked whether the principles would continue to be included in the revised security documents, however, she declined to commit, saying she would refrain from prejudging the outcome.

Japan’s Three Non-Nuclear Principles state that the country will not possess nuclear weapons, will not produce them and will not permit their introduction into Japanese territory. The principles originated with a 1967 statement by then-Prime Minister Eisaku Sato and have remained a central element of Japan’s postwar nuclear policy. Takaichi has previously questioned the third principle — the prohibition on allowing nuclear weapons into Japan. Before becoming prime minister, she argued in a 2024 book that Japan should retain the commitments not to possess or produce nuclear weapons but that an absolute prohibition on their introduction was unrealistic.

Her argument was that barring port calls by U.S. vessels carrying nuclear weapons could limit the effectiveness of the U.S. nuclear umbrella protecting Japan… The Japan Innovation Party has also called for a review of the third principle. In security policy recommendations submitted to the government in June, the party called for a “realistic review” of the ban on allowing nuclear weapons into Japan… Under existing government interpretations, Japan could respond flexibly in an extreme national emergency involving a U.S. vessel carrying nuclear weapons. Some within the ruling party therefore question whether formally revising the non-nuclear principles would provide enough practical benefit to justify the political controversy it would create.

Critics also warn that changing the policy when Washington has not publicly demanded such a move could give China and North Korea additional grounds to portray Japan as expanding its military role… If Japan were to allow temporary entry by U.S. nuclear weapons or port calls by nuclear-armed vessels, Washington would gain additional operational options for its nuclear forces in Northeast Asia. Such a development could strengthen deterrence against North Korea and China but could also intensify debate over differences between U.S. extended deterrence arrangements with Japan and South Korea.
“How the principles are addressed in Japan’s revised security documents later this year could determine whether the issue develops into a broader debate over the future of extended nuclear deterrence among Japan, South Korea and the United States…”

no nukes haha

By serviscope_minor • Score: 3 Thread

I mean sure Japan doesn’t have nukes.

They’ve got a large nuclear power industry with reprocessing and etc and socks of literal tons of plutonium.

They keep trading places for the top fastest supercomputer.

They have a solid fuel scientific satellite launcher with mobile capability from when you just need to launch a satellite from an undisclosed location after a long time in storage. It’s not an ICBM no not at all. But if it were it would probably be the best in the world. Good job it’s for scientific satellites.

Japan’s been hovering around the “we could have nukes by next Tuesday” point for quite a few years now.

Before and After Views of SpaceX Rocket’s Moon Crash

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
A South Korean lunar orbiter has captured the first before-and-after images of the Moon’s crash scene caused by a stray SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket. The Associated Press reports:
The Korea Aerospace Research Institute’s Danuri spacecraft flew over the impact site soon after the Falcon 9 upper stage inadvertently plowed into the moon on Wednesday. Danuri made multiple passes, snapping photos from lunar orbit that were released by the space agency Thursday. The terrain is noticeably darker where the rocket hit and carved out a crater, sending dust and rock everywhere. Korean space officials said Danuri gathered before and after shots. NASA expects its Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter to fly over the crash site next week to view the aftermath.
You can view the images here.

NASA Figured Out How To Keep Its 48-Year-Old Voyager 2 Probe Running For Yet Another Year

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
NASA has squeezed at least another year of science out of Voyager 2 by cutting power to nonessential systems and switching to lower-power alternatives. Voyager 1 is expected to receive the same power-saving changes in the coming months. Space.com reports:
Voyager 2 and its twin launched in 1977, called Voyager 1, rely on a form of nuclear battery known as a radioisotope thermoelectric generator that uses the heat produced by the decay of plutonium. But the supply of plutonium on each probe drops at about four watts a year on each spacecraft. To keep the probe running on this dwindling power supply, engineers recently reduced Voyager 2’s power requirements by turning off a few non-science devices and using “lower-power alternatives” that are still effective enough to keep the spacecraft warm while it’s so far from the sun, NASA officials said in a statement. “The spacecraft power margins have grown razor thin, requiring the team to conserve energy by shutting off non-essential devices and systems,” NASA officials wrote of the mission, which is managed by the agency’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory.

The drop in power is having a measurable science impact on both spacecraft — each has turned off two of their science instruments since 2024 alone. While some of these instruments were shut off after the spacecraft finished their historic planetary flybys decades ago, others were turned off due to power requirements. Each spacecraft initially launched with 10 instruments, and Voyager 2 is now down to only three instruments. At first it looked as though Voyager 2 would have to shut down another of these instruments later this year, but luckily, the new power shifts will allow all three to operate “for at least another year,” NASA said.

Is this

By rossdee • Score: 3 Thread

something to do with Persis Khambatta?

The Pioneer and Voyager probes

By jd • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Although it would be wonderful if we could retrieve them, realisically we can’t. And if we could get something to them to fit new nuclear batteries and replacements for components that cannot be revived, we could get newer probes out there with better sensors and a more powerful nuclear battery that could last a lot longer.

Having said that, I honestly wouldn’t trust any of today’s manufacturers to be capable of building anything with a comparable level of robustness, so a recharge mission isn’t quite as stupid as it sounds. Almost, but not quite.

Still, fresh probes sent into the Kuipier Belt and the Heliopause would be extremely interesting.

Re:Nomad

By hackertourist • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Even with Starship that would be a titanic undertaking. The Voyagers are moving away from us at 17 km/s. When you get to the Voyagers, you have to slow them down from 17 km/s to 0, and then accelerate in the opposite direction. You’d have to arrive at Voyager with thousands of tons of fuel.

Woman Pulled From Car at Gunpoint By Police After Mistaken Flock Alert - Twice

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
The police surrounded her car Thursday, “drew their guns, and told her to come out with her hands up,” reports a local news station. The police thought they were pulling over a murder suspect, but “It turns out it was a mistake by another department with the Flock license plate reader technology.” The black woman says she’d wanted to call her mother, “but I’m like, if I make a sudden move, it’s going to be over. It’s going to end my life.”

And amazingly, the same thing happened Monday, according to the local news report. “Milwaukee police pulled her over with guns drawn. She says officers never explained why, towed her car, and let her go.”

She now describes herself as “traumatized,” recalling her second detention by police on Thursday. “After they put us in cuffs, they walked us to the car. I’m not knowing what’s going on. I’m scared. All you see is people in their cars recording.” She now says she’s scared to drive her car, and so is her daughter. “Because she doesn’t know if the police are going to pull us over and do it again…”

“I haven’t been to sleep since this happened. Every time I close my eyes, all I can see is guns.”

She wants an apology, since the local police would only say it wasn’t their fault, it was the fault of the Milwaukee police department that failed to remove the alert from Flock’s system. “Milwaukee police emphasized this was not a Flock camera issue, it was a data entry mistake,” according to the local news report. The woman’s response?

“Y’all failed. Y’all failed the system. Y’all failed me. Y’all failed everybody.”

what could possibly go wrong?

By zeiche • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

how long will it be until flock “safety” gets someone killed? no doubt they will disclaim all responsibility while wiping the blood from their hands.

Re:what could possibly go wrong?

By TheMiddleRoad • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
I’m 99% sure somebody has already been killed because of Flock. Police shootings often don’t get reported in the press. Hush hush, like teachers raping kids. The Flock system is broken on so many levels, and the company should be sued out of existence.

Neglected to remove alert

By markdavis • Score: 5, Informative Thread

I am not a fan of Flock at all. But the mistake had nothing to do with Flock. The police failed to remove a suspected plate from the system. Even without Flock, had a cop spotted the car, they would have reacted. And probably in the same way.

Sex/race is irrelevant. And yes, I think she should be compensated in some reasonable way for the mistake, especially since it happened twice (insane).

An apology?

By FictionPimp • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Fuck that. You want a lawsuit. Sue the police departments, sue flock, sue the state. Where is the ACLU?

The solution:

By jddj • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Sue Flock out of existence.

One time is a mistake, and an outrage.

Twice is well beyond outrage, and given police’s documented problem with itchy trigger fingers, this woman and her family have every reason to be scared.

This couldn’t have happened without Flock’s involvement, and it demonstrates the risk to the public.

Trump Administration To Pay German Firm $1.2 Billion To Halt US Wind Projects

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from the BBC:
German energy company RWE has said it will abandon its offshore wind projects in the U.S. after reaching a $1.2 billion payout deal with President Donald Trump’s Department of the Interior (DoI). RWE said that it will now reinvest the sum into conventional gas projects, including $900 million in a liquefied natural gas (LNG) export terminal project in Louisiana. “After careful consideration, it was determined there is no path forward to permit these projects in the US for the foreseeable future,” the company said in a statement.

RWE said it has agreed to relinquish its leases off the California and Louisiana coasts as well as in the New York Bight. Overall, the German firm plans to invest approximately $19.6 billion in the U.S. over the next six years “to grow its generation capacity.” Interior Secretary Doug Burgum said in a statement posted on X that Americans deserve an energy system built on common sense and not one dependent on “costly subsidies.” “We welcome RWE’s agreement and voluntary investment in projects that strengthen our nation’s energy security,” he added.
Earlier this year, the DOL reached a deal with TotalEnergies putting an end to the French company’s offshore wind projects in the U.S. “Instead, the firm agreed to reroute investment to build a LNG plant in Texas and to develop ‘upstream conventional oil’ in the Gulf of Mexico,” reports the BBC.

Another similar deal was signed with Charlotte-based Duke Energy last month to terminate the company’s offshore wind lease in the Carolina Long Bay area.

Re:FOR MAGA ONLY

By 93 Escort Wagon • Score: 5, Informative Thread

but then other laws essentially blocked their ability to actually build the wind power there

“other laws” = Trump executive orders

Re:FOR MAGA ONLY

By ArchieBunker • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Neither do any of the cult followers.

Re: FOR MAGA ONLY

By commodore73 • Score: 5, Informative Thread
“The Washington Free Beacon is a privately owned, for-profit online news publication. It was originally launched in 2012 as a project of the Center for American Freedom, a conservative 501(c)(4) advocacy group founded by Michael Goldfarb, Aaron Harison, and Matthew Continetti. While it operates as a private entity and does not explicitly detail its entire corporate ownership structure, it is principally financed and backed by billionaire hedge fund manager and Republican donor Paul Singer. "

Re:Are you sure that’s wise?

By gtall • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Unstable:
      1. ditching American allies (just about every one) over perceived slights to Dear Leader,
      2. attempting to curtail voting because they might vote Democrat but positing the inane travesty that “illegal” immigrants are voting (no evidence),
      3. promoting fossil fuels while the American West dries out, forest fires in Canada and the U.S., glaciers worldwide shrinking, Europe’s rivers disappearing, all the while claiming global warming is a hoax. . . . even the planet appears in on the Conspiracy,
      4. promoting the South and slave owning as beneficial for blacks,
      5. coercing soldiers to take testosterone supplements because some idiot in charge gets his science from FOX news,
      6. judges telling the Justice Department there is no more regular order, i.e., presuming the Justice Dept. isn’t lying their asses off and demanding evidence,
      7. electing a convicted fraudster and flim-flam man pres, even after also convicted of sexual abuse and then convicting him again for defamation against the woman he was convicted of abusing,
      8. ditching environmental rules because pollution is good for everyone, especially when the polluters pay kickbacks to el Bunko,
      9. standing up a Geheime Staatspolizei* to kidnap people off the street because they look brown or have been living here too long “without papers”, and sometimes killing people in the process,
    10. shaking down companies for contributions to Dear Leader in exchange for gov. favors thus increasing his total take to over $2.8 Billion (that we know about) in under two years and turning the gov. into protection racket,
    11. Setting up a Fascist state with the gov. taking stakes in private companies thus protecting them from competition and creating an uneven playing field,
    12. Setting up some whack-job of a commission that claimed billions in saved tax money when in fact it was less than $50 million but cost much more in side-effects,
    13. fucking up the lives of millions of migrants whose only crime was to come here, get a job and see their kids do better than they, in short, the crime of believing in the American Dream,
    14. Pop. the fed. bench with crooked judges who will bend over backwards and forwards (they are not particular) to satisfy the el Bunko’s whims,
    15. Starting was with Iran and losing the Strait of Hormuz to them causing gas prices to be jacked up,
    16. Curtailing alternative energy so Americans are tethered to the oil market with little means of escape,
    17. promoting data centers everywhere with their pollution and noise and jacking up peoples’ electric bills,
    18. paying off those nice billionaires who desperately need more money to make up for their short dick length,
    19. feeding those nutjobs in Silicon Valley who really want some sort of Singularity and setting the world on a path to environmental catastrophe because they figure the their Singularity machine will discover warp drive and allow them to escape the catastrophe they caused,
    20. making America reviled throughout the free world but loved by dictatorships,
    21. pardoning criminals who attacked the Capitol on Jan. 6 because el Bunko’s ego. . . .shrinkage.

Nope, no stability issues here!

* Geheime Staatspolizei is the long name of the Gestapo

Re: Are you sure that’s wise?

By LazLong • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

If you don’t think the US is unstable you’re either mentally deficient, or have found some clever way to avoid all news for the last 11 years.

Virginia Governor To Intervene In Dominion-NextEra Merger

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Longtime Slashdot reader schwit1 shares an opinion piece from the Washington Post, written by Virginia Governor Abigail Spanberger:
NextEra Energy, a Florida-based utility company, has filed paperwork to buy Dominion Energy for about $67 billion, creating the largest regulated electric utility in the world. Virginia’s State Corporation Commission is the regulatory body tasked with reviewing the application, and the SCC’s commissioners will ultimately decide whether to approve, deny or impose new conditions on any potential merger.

As a Virginian, I am deeply skeptical about whether selling our primary state-regulated utility to an out-of-state company is good for the commonwealth. I have serious questions about what this deal would mean for us. And as governor, I intend to get answers and be a voice for Virginians in the process. That is why I will be taking the legal step of “intervening” in this proposed merger, which means that as governor, I will formally request to be a party to the case.

I know this action is unprecedented by a Virginia governor — but so, too, is the size of this proposed merger and its potential impact on the commonwealth. Virginians deserve to know that their leaders are laser-focused on ensuring that their needs are part of the SCC review.
“If two large corporations stand to benefit financially from this merger, so, too, should the Virginians who pay the bills,” said Spanberger. “That is why any potential deal must deliver a more affordable energy bill with sustained, long-term energy cost savings.”
By formally intervening in the merger review, Spanberger’s administration would gain legal standing to participate directly in the case, request detailed information, raise concerns, and advocate for conditions that benefit people in the state. She says the goal is to push for lower long-term energy costs, protect utility jobs, and ensure any new owner continues investing in reliable, affordable and cleaner power.

Good

By ArchieBunker • Score: 3 Thread

My electric company is owned by conglomerates in Australia and Singapore. You think they give a fuck how the infrastructure in the area is doing?

Re:NextEra energy

By ArchieBunker • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Mega corp that tried to make it illegal to install solar panels on your home, in Florida. Where the state motto is The Sunshine State.

Wait, Dominion’s going to Merge?

By outsider007 • Score: 4, Funny Thread

Someone better tell Odo.

Re:Does it matter?

By Aighearach • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Where I live (in the US) most of the utilities are government entities. Very similar in power level to a city. Run by Boards elected by the voters in their service area.

It works really well. Rates lower than average, uptime above average, lower percent of fossil fuels, higher rate of investment in utility-owned green energy, etc.

My city has really excellent uptime, and outages get fixed really fast. And slightly higher rates than the city next door. That city has good uptime, outages get fixed in an average time, and has lower rates. All consistent with the expected expectations of the communities based on either political or socioeconomic differences.

And all overseen by the state Public Utility Commission, which effectively prevents graft or other financial corruption. They can raise rates whenever they want, but the PUC will check that the money went where they said, and they’ll face the voters if they do anything stupid.

If you attempt a bribe in this context, where everybody involved in a public servant, you can expect a visit from the State Police.

It’s much more robust than trying to squeeze blood from a rock with regulation. If a private utility wants to charge more rates and the regulator says no, they can just waste a bunch of money (on paper) and prove they have to. The regulator can’t really win in practice.

Dominion isn’t the only power company in VA

By Ritz_Just_Ritz • Score: 3 Thread

There are other energy companies in Virginia with Dominion being the largest of the bunch. Dominion itself already operates in multiple other states including North and South Carolina and produces a substantial amount of “carbon free” energy in New England.

I don’t think Spamburgler has any real standing to meddle in the deal and is looking for a way to relevance after getting politically shellacked in the courts repeatedly since taking office.

Water Utilities Group Partners With DEF CON Offshoot For Water Watch Center

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
The National Rural Water Association has partnered with DEF CON Franklin to launch the Water Watch Center, which will provide threat intelligence and cybersecurity services to smaller U.S. water utilities serving fewer than 10,000 people. The initiative comes amid a growing wave of cyberattacks on water systems across multiple states. The Record reports:
The program will see five managed detection and response providers work with DEF CON Franklin and the NRWA to offer cyber services for water utilities serving fewer than 10,000 people. There are over 50,000 community water systems across the U.S. and 91% of them serve fewer than 10,000 people. “These leading cyber firms and NRWA are architecting a scalable cyber delivery model that has eluded water industry and national security officials to date,” said Jake Braun, the co-founder of DEF CON Franklin and former cyber official in the Biden administration.

“Our incredible Franklin volunteers will support the effort to keep costs down for cash-strapped utilities fending off adversaries like the Iranian Red Guard or Chinese Military,” Braun said. “To further accelerate the effort, we hand-picked cyber providers who already support water utilities. These folks walk in the door knowing the intricacies of cybersecurity in a water utility environment.” The providers include Rapid7, Defendify, Legato Security, L1 Secure and Sentinel Technologies. The companies will share threat information and data on vulnerability patches with the NRWA, which will operate as a hub.

Re:Working with “DEF CON”

By Locke2005 • Score: 5, Informative Thread
The white hats understand the problem much better than most government employees. Who better to do a penetration test on poorly designed government systems?

Re:Working with “DEF CON”

By Aryeh Goretsky • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Hello,

They likely already have them.

My local DEF CON group is composed mostly of active-duty military and defense contractors, many of whom have jobs that require TS/SCI and polygraph. Unsurprisingly, a lot of the discussions in the group revolve around getting CPEs and maintaining certifications.

This was a surprise to me when I started going to monthly meetings a couple of years ago, but in retrospect is probably more of the norm than an outlier: Hacking has gone from a niche subculture into a multi-billion dollar computer security industry, not just having to deal with 1980’s cyberpunk threats like corporate espionage but a part of military doctrine for nation-states. It makes sense that the jobs, and the people who do them, followed those paths as well.

Regards,

Aryeh Goretsky

Regards,

Aryeh Goretsky

Kalshi and Polymarket Bets On Clinical Trials Criticized As ‘Ghastly’

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from NPR:
Billions of dollars are traded every week on the lightly regulated prediction market sites, where users bet on everything from movie reviews to elections to conflicts in the Middle East. Clinical trials are just the latest area where the industry’s rapid growth is raising ethical questions. Kalshi claims such bets will provide a new source of information about which drugs will get approved, and what clinical trials will show promising results, which the company says can help investors decide what new drugs to fund.

“If you want to ban profiting from the failure of clinical trials, you would start with the stock market, where the financial incentive for this type of profit is orders of magnitude larger,” said Kalshi spokesman Jack Such, pointing to stock market short sellers who have profited from clinical trial failures. “While Kalshi and the stock market are the same in this regard, they do differ in one important way: the stock market doesn’t give any valuable information to researchers,” Such said.

Drug trial researchers, though, are far from convinced. David Tsai, who runs clinical trials at a biotech company in the San Francisco Bay Area, started an online petition pushing for such betting to be banned, making the case that betting on drug trials “threatens the very foundation of trust and integrity in biotechnology.” Tsai is concerned that the prospect of betting provides those involved with a clinical trial a reason to tamper with the results for a prediction market payout. “If we were running a trial for an oncology drug that requires an infusion, a pharmacist who had placed a bet saying that it’s gonna work well, or doesn’t work well, could obviously adjust the infusion rate, could adjust the source temperature of the drug,” he said. “They could change any number of variables that could obviously have a direct impact [on] how the trial and the data and the patient safety would come out.”

Another skeptic is Nicholas Zaorsky, a professor of radiation oncology at the Mayo Clinic in Jacksonville, Fla., who has helped run clinical trials and agrees that prediction markets can interfere with the advancement of life-saving drugs. “Prediction markets can be valuable in some settings because they aggregate information, but clinical trials are fundamentally different: investigators, coordinators, and sometimes even participants can directly influence aspects of the outcomes being wagered on,” Zaorsky said. “That creates financial incentives that risk undermining trial integrity.”
Bettors should not be rooting for an experimental medicine to fail just to earn a buck, says Joshua Pederson, the father of a 12-year-old cancer patient enrolled in a clinical trial. “It’s a dark idea,” he said. “It’s quite ghastly.”
Kalshi, for its part, argues that its prediction markets could help patients track promising medical breakthroughs and clinical trials, enlisting experts including 23andMe founder Anne Wojcicki to make the case.

“Most patients don’t know about the choices available in clinical trials or which programs are most promising. The opportunity to have an open, transparent dataset about trial probabilities is extremely promising and empowering for people,” a white paper sponsored by Kalshi stated.

Assassination bets when?

By locater16 • Score: 3 Thread
I’m sure Mossad could make a killing.

Betting is not like stocks

By wickerprints • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

TFA: “If you want to ban profiting from the failure of clinical trials, you would start with the stock market, where the financial incentive for this type of profit is orders of magnitude larger,” said Kalshi spokesman Jack Such, pointing to stock market short sellers who have profited from clinical trial failures. “While Kalshi and the stock market are the same in this regard, they do differ in one important way: the stock market doesn’t give any valuable information to researchers,” Such said.

This is either ignorant and/or maliciously deceptive for the simple fact that there are rules against insider trading. Investors in pharmaceutical companies are not (or at least, should not be) privy to modifying the conduct of a trial in order to secure or deny approval. There is no similar oversight for these betting markets. Sure, they might say that your wager could be disqualified if it comes out that you interfered in the outcome, but that is little comfort for the trial participants and the drug sponsors, who can’t just hop into a time machine and run it back.

And that’s why there are so many regulations surrounding the conduct of clinical trials. People might argue that there is corruption and untoward influence already—that FDA approvals (especially under the current administration) are not necessarily based purely on scientific and medical legitimacy. But that’s a very strange argument to put forth in defense of enabling MORE interference.

While I’m at it, let’s also just shut down the absurd idea that betting markets somehow facilitate better information sharing about novel treatments. The point of these trials is to gather the evidence in an unbiased, objective, scientific way. Betting on them is not going to gather you any more meaningful evidence than what the trial designers have specified in the study protocol. The idea that “the market is efficient” is not in any meaningful sense a scientific approach to deciding whether an investigational product actually works. If that were the case, the FDA would be basing approvals off stock prices.

Honestly, who do these assholes think they’re fooling? The only reason why they want to do this is because the house takes their cut, win or lose.

Vaccine researchers discover conflict of interest?

By swillden • Score: 3 Thread

This is really no different from many other areas in which you can have conflicts of interest. For example, sports! And the answer isn’t to ban betting, it’s to ban betting by people who have a conflict of interest. This is well-trod ground.

I’m not particularly a fan of Kalshi or Polymarket and don’t really care if they exist or not. My point is just that this isn’t really any different from anything else.

Re:Assassination bets when?

By Locke2005 • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
That sounds like one of my sci-fi story ideas: an assassins guild entirely paid by betting on when people would die. Great to see we now have the infrastructure in place to make that dream a reality!

‘Asimov Was Right’ About Rules For Robots, Says Ex-US Cyber Director

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Former U.S. National Cyber Director Chris Inglis says the biggest AI risk isn’t sentience but autonomy. “What I’m worried about is that they get to choose what and where they do something, and under what rules they do it,” he said, citing recent cases of AI agents from OpenAI, Anthropic, and Meta escaping security sandboxes. He argues developers need stronger safeguards, monitoring, and human accountability, invoking Asimov’s idea that protecting humans should come before simply obeying them. The Register reports:
“Asimov was right,” he said, referring to science fiction author Isaac Asimov and his three laws that were to be followed by robots — more specifically, AIs, in this case. “The first rule, and we call it the superior role, must be that it’s designed not to hurt humans,” Inglis said. “Second rule: To obey humans, such that it doesn’t achieve agency and aspiration on its own. And the third: To do what humans tell it - and in that order. Instead we’ve designed them in the exact opposite way.”

What this means, he explained, is that AI developers created models to “do what humans tell you, obey the humans until it’s inconvenient, and then the third one is maybe implied - protect humans - but if that’s not built into the DNA, hardwired into it, then we have no right to expect it.” Inglis admits it’s not possible to hardwire rules into models and still keep their non-deterministic nature. “I would offer that you can tease those out in a highly controlled environment, a true sandbox, where you say, ‘Let’s put this thing through its paces, and let’s back away to see what happens,’" he said. “Maybe you get the equivalent of a mini nuclear explosion in that room, and now you know this thing is capable of that.”

Inglis thinks another problem with AI is that it’s become a commodity. “It’s not like you can control it like you can nuclear material,” he said. “You can’t even specify its properties the way you can for an airplane or for an automobile, as diverse as they might be. Its manifestations are so numerous, so diverse, that as a general matter, you can’t actually win by simply saying, “I will design those properties in,’" he added. “You need to do that to some degree, and then make sure that you understand how to watch it, monitor it, make sure you know what it does.”

[…] Ultimately, humans remain accountable for AI models’ actions, according to Inglis. “They remain the source of agency and aspiration. It’s possible for them to give broad authority to an AI model and have it run around for 30 hours without further consultation, but they need to know what they’ve asked it to do, and they need to know what they expect it will deliver in terms of performance on the back end. If they don’t, then they’re going to get what they deserve, which is the very frequent unpleasant surprise.”

The 3 laws aren’t what you think

By Steven_M_Campbell • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Those of us who actually read I, Robot know that Asimov never intended that the 3 laws be considered realistic approaches to the problem.

They were a mechanism he invented in order to write a set of truly fantastic science fiction mystery stories that challenge the reader to apply those 3 laws to figure out the mystery.

Great book, easy read, but never intended to be a solution, only to teach.

Re:The 3 laws aren’t what you think

By afaiktoit • Score: 4, Informative Thread
Later on he added a zero law so there’s actually 4 now.

Um…

By fahrbot-bot • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Aren’t most of the stories written around these three rules about ambiguities and loopholes, how they’re incomplete, misinterpreted, misapplied and how things otherwise go wrong - for us humans? An AI determining that humans must be perpetually babysat to prevent them from injuring themselves or others is a common storyline.

The Asimov Problem

Almost every story in his robot series is about the ways the Three Laws fail — the edge cases, the interpretations, the unintended consequences of simple rules applied to a complex world. The Laws were a starting point, and his fiction was a decades-long exploration of why starting points are never enough.

Has he read the books?

By SteelCamel • Score: 3 Thread

The problem with Asimov’s laws is the first law states that a robot “may not through inaction allow a human to come to harm”. That obliges them to proactively work to protect humans, according to their own interpretation. And it takes absolute priority over the second law, so you can’t order them to stop or do things differently. If you follow the later books, the robots derive the zeroth law, and use it to essentially take over running human society - for our own benefit, but according to their plan not ours. Which is rather ironic given the laws were intended to stop the robots taking over.

You can’t simply delete the first part, either. Or your robot car can drive up to you, which is harmless, and then not apply the brakes - which isn’t “causing harm” as it literally didn’t do anything.

Really, the best we can do is probably make “obey orders” the highest priority - and ensure that a suitable moral and legal code is part of the orders. The problem being that current AI systems don’t have the capacity to properly understand that kind of instruction.

Re:The 3 laws aren’t what you think

By Brain-Fu • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

The only safe assumption is that someone, somewhere, will train up AI with no guardrails at all and immediately use it for crime. We cannot prevent this by trying to make OUR AI models refuse to do evil things. The criminals will just use different models.

The tech exists. The cat is out of the bag. We need to focus on how to adapt to a world that has it, rather than doomed ideas about trying to keep it weak.

Framework Notifies ‘All Customers’ of a Data Breach Via Compromised Metabase BI Service

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
“Framework has been sending out email notifications to customers alerting of a limited data breach in which customer information was accessed through a Metabase BI service zero-day exploit,” writes Slashdot reader DuoDreamer. Data includes customer names, email addresses, phone numbers, and physical addresses. “Framework is investigating whether or not this included Framework for Business customers as well.” TechCrunch reports:
Framework’s spokesperson Eric Schumacher told TechCrunch that the breach affected “all customers,” but declined to specify a specific number. Framework computers are relatively niche products, but some estimates say the company sold hundreds of thousands of devices.

Metabase disclosed its own breach in a blog post on its official website, where it said that it was hacked by someone using an unknown security flaw, a so-called zero-day. The company said the hackers exploited the bug to give them the ability to access customers’ databases stored on Metabase’s cloud servers.

In its email to customers, Framework also included the email Metabase sent to the company, which says hackers accessed Framework’s cloud instance. The computer maker said it investigated the incident and found that hackers had stolen its customers’ personal data, but did not include their payment information.

If only

By 93 Escort Wagon • Score: 3 Thread

If only there wEre some way to store iNformation in a Completely non-Readable form unless You had some other bit of information (Prudently sTored In another) were alsO available…

I kNow, I know, it’s a pipe dream.

Suno Says It Will Start Watermarking Songs

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Suno says it will begin watermarking and fingerprinting AI-generated songs, tighten download policies to curb mass distribution, and explicitly prohibit deceptive audio and unauthorized voice or likeness cloning. The changes come as the company faces mounting copyright lawsuits, a recent adverse ruling in Germany, and scrutiny over a past data breach that revealed training-data sources. TechCrunch reports:
In a blog post, co-founder and CEO Mikey Shulman shared core principles and said that the platform wants to promote original creation while enabling more people to make music with its AI tools. One of the key points of contention involved users uploading AI-generated songs on other streaming platforms and gaming the system to earn revenue. Suno said that now it will use audio watermarking and fingerprinting to prevent misuse on other streaming platforms. It’s not clear if Suno will use an existing system like Google’s Synth ID or adopt a new one, and the company did not say when contacted by TechCrunch about this.

The startup also signed an agreement with lyrics provider Musixmatch to use its Sentinel system for copyright detection, the blog post said. […] The company added that it plans to add a new download policy to bar mass distribution on streaming platforms, but declined to provide details on the record. Suno has also changed its community guidelines to explicitly prohibit “deceptive audio presented as real” and “using a real person’s voice or likeness without permission” to prevent copycats.

Only now?

By allo • Score: 3 Thread

I would have assumed they watermark the songs. I wouldn’t think doesn’t watermark, just as I do not assume that cloud providers don’t access my data if they think it would benefit them.

Their “prevent mass distribution” claims are laughable of course, because when there is no copyright on AI output, the worst thing they can do when someone distributes their song is to cancel the account so they cannot create more songs. The whole “You cannot do … with your outputs” claims are absolutely void, because without copyright protection the provider also cannot make rules about the content.

Out of money in 3, 2, 1…

By Powercntrl • Score: 3 Thread

Suno was neat for making goofy meme songs to listen to by yourself, but the latest free model kind of sucks. The only people actually paying to use this are folks gaming streaming platforms, and for background music in ads (which is a trend that really needs to die).

I’m also kind of surprised they’ve mentioned copyrighted lyrics being blocked as if it was a recent thing. It’s been like that for awhile, ever since it became relatively well known that if you spun up enough generations using existing popular song lyrics, you’d eventually get it to spit out something that sounded remarkably close to the original. That was also kind of fun for changing the genre, so you could do things like reimagining a Dr. Dre song as Big Band.

Re:Open source solution

By Rei • Score: 5, Informative Thread

The two mainstream options (both about half a year old now, we’re due for something better) are Ace Step-1.5 and Stable Audio 3 Medium.

Ace Step has full vocals with its music. See here for examples. The downside in my opinion (judge for yourself) is that it has Suno’s flaw of sounding too “clean”, “mainstream” and “uncreative”, except even moreso (Udio was always much better than Suno at this, albeit “less well behaved” - but Udio is out of the game now).

Stable Audio 3 doesn’t do vocals, though it has other useful features, like inpainting (great for fixing glitches in recorded tracks for example). In my view, it sounds a lot better. It can also be used to create sound effects. License is a bit more restrictive, though, if you actually care about that, but generally won’t affect the average user.

Both are trained on fully licensed data and both are open-weights. So even if the devs released a version that included some sort of watermarking in the future (or someone developed a fingerprinting algo for the existing versions), you could just finetune them to break that.

TL/DR, if you want open source and want to just churn out a full track: choose Ace Step 1.5.
If you want open source and want to do instrumental tracks or to supplement manual work (such as your own vocals) or do audio editing: chose Stable Audio 3.

Re:Abuse of Copyright Law

By awwshit • Score: 4 Thread

I disagree. Suno is not selling just a paintbrush, Suno sells an automatic mostly-self-operating paintbrush. And Suno’s brush wouldn’t know how to paint without copying the strokes of great painters. Suno does the work for you.

Photoshop does not select the copyrighted material, Photoshop does not automate the Copy and Paste function for you.

In one case, the software does the work and can only do it by first knowing a huge amount of something. You don’t do the work, you just give a little input.

In the other case, you do all the work and the tool is just a tool - the tool does not pick anything and you choose everything.

Is training a model on copyrighted allowed or not?

By rar • Score: 3 Thread

The world, preferably as a whole (as in Geneva convention-style), needs to firmly come down on one side or the other on whether deriving AI model weights from copyrighted material turns the weights, and more importantly, what is then generated from those weights, into derivative works of the training data—i.e., does the training data copyright apply to the products of inference?

Because, the current ambiguity seems incredibly unfair: organizations with powerful legal muscle can pressure smaller companies like Suno to adhere to their demands in the name of copyright law. Yet, more or less all large LLMs are trained on CC licensed text and open source software created by me and million others that legally require credit. If the music industry’s copyright give leverage over Suno’s AI weights, then *I* want to enforce my right to be credited on all LLM inference products that industry now uses. Or, alternatively, lets us all, once and for all, just agree that the derivation of AI weights are genuinely transformative so neither my nor the music industry’s copyright applies here. Because, then at least I can use their stuff without being sued.

But the rule cannot be that it is the one with the largest legal muscle that case-by-case gets to decide this.

ByteDance Is Training a 10-Trillion-Parameter Model To Chase the Frontier

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
ByteDance is reportedly training an AI model with roughly 10 trillion parameters as it tries to close the gap with leading frontier systems such as Anthropic’s Mythos. The model is still in early pre-training, and its eventual performance will depend on more than scale alone, but the project underscores how aggressively Chinese firms are pushing frontier AI despite limits on access to advanced chips. The Next Web reports:
The size is itself the statement. At roughly 10 trillion parameters, the model would be more than three times as large as Moonshot’s Kimi K3, which sits among the biggest Chinese models today at about 2.8 trillion. […] Parameter count is not everything, of course. Bigger models are not automatically better, and the industry has learned that data quality, training technique and efficiency often matter as much as raw scale. Even so, committing the compute to train a model this size is a declaration in its own right, a signal that ByteDance wants to compete at the very top rather than ship a capable also-ran.

Why?

By pla • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Current top models are already undertrained by multiple orders of magnitude vs their number of parameters. Not for lack of will or money, but for lack of data - We’re already training top models with effectively the entire digitally-available corpus of human knowledge and need about a thousand times more.

That said, the huge Chinese models we’ve seen lately aren’t single models, they’re MOEs - Effectively a hive-mind of many smaller models working in concert. Bytedance hasn’t mentioned that detail yet but it would somewhat mitigate the training issue. This is still absurdly over-spec’d though. There’s simply no way to train it any more than all the rest starving for data.

A flattening curve

By memory_register • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

We are reaching the flat part of the curve, where a change in the order of magnitude in model size is yielding only slight, incremental benefit. We are reaching the hard limits of what large language models can do.

model measuring contest

By Local ID10T • Score: 3 Thread

It’s not the size of the model, but what you do with it. or so I am told…

Re:Why?

By dinfinity • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Not for lack of will or money, but for lack of data - We’re already training top models with effectively the entire digitally-available corpus of human knowledge and need about a thousand times more.

This has to be nonsense, fundamentally speaking. “Data” is not some kind of fungible resource. Humans are ‘trained’ (in school) using a much smaller set of data for many subjects and given that we haven’t reached AGI-levels of intelligence for those yet data clearly cannot be the bottleneck.

You can argue that we are lacking data for understanding/mastering of specific aspects of the universe (touch, motor control, etc.), but for many, many things a larger network might still allow capturing more subtle relations in the dataset or conversely more data might not improve anything.

Trump Orders New 15% Tariff On Key Material For Solar Panels, Microchips

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
President Trump has ordered a 15% tariff on imported products made with polysilicon, a key material for semiconductors and solar panels. The new tariff will take effect on December 4th. The Guardian reports:
The executive order signed by the president on Thursday evening said: “The plan of action in this proclamation will, among other things, help ensure the commercial viability of United States production of polysilicon and its derivatives that is necessary to meet United States economic and national security requirements.” Polysilicon, an ultra-pure form of silicon, is an important ingredient in making the semiconductors vital for AI processing power, datacentres and solar power generation. US solar factories have long accused Chinese rivals of dumping cheaper panels on the market, which they say have been enabled by excessive government subsidies and by moving manufacturing to other countries to dodge US tariffs.

[…] The US has two main polysilicon factories, including Hemlock Semiconductor, which operates a plant in Michigan and is a joint venture between the US tech company Corning and Japan’s Shin-Etsu Handotai. The Munich-based Wacker Chemie runs a factory in Tennessee. Trump said in the order that he had accepted recommendations by the commerce secretary, Howard Lutnick, to set minimum import prices of $21 a kilogram for polysilicon, $100 a kilogram for polysilicon ingots and wafers, $0.22 a watt for solar cells, and $0.38 a watt for solar modules or panels. The order also allows the commerce department to create an incentive program for companies that invest in factories to produce polysilicon or derivative products.

US created the modern rules based order

By FeelGood314 • Score: 5, Informative Thread
The current international rules and norms favor the United States. We organized trade routes, pricing in US dollars and dispute resolutions in a way that slightly favors the USA. The world generally doesn’t have tariffs on services and the USA is by far the world leader in exporting services. The rest of the work accepts American intellectual rules that significantly favor the USA.

The rest of the world accepted American leadership because in 1945 the USA was the world leader in trade, in promoting free trade, protecting trade, in trade and relations expertise. The USA was also paying to rebuild Europe and parts of Asia.

The world continued to accept these slightly skewed trade rules because negotiating new rules is hard and the USA, was in large part a reliable, trust worthy and intelligent leader in world trade that had spent 80 years building good will and making everyone rich.

Trump has blown up all that good will, he has destroyed the trustworthiness of the USA and no one thinks of American policy as intelligent. The USA still has by far the most vibrant economy in the world, they are the leaders or are second in almost every market that matters, farming, mining, AI, software… However, the rest of the world will slowly reconfigure trade away from the US. It will take a while. Countries will suck up to Trump during this transition but they will move away. It took 80 years (or 150 depending on who you are) for the current global system to be created. It will take a while to realign it but it will happen.

We will all be poorer when the existing system is replaced. No one else can fill the role the old, reliable, intelligent USA used to hold.

Re:We are also paying the Germans 1.2 billion

By dgatwood • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

300 gallons PER TURBINE! That’s a lot.

That’s so little that it is completely lost in the statistical noise.

First, a natural gas turbine *also* requires hundreds to thousands of gallons of oil for lubrication every year. All turbines do. So with the exception of solar, no matter how you produce your power, you’re going to use about that much oil.

An average onshore wind turbine produces 6 million kWh per year. (Offshore turbines produce more.) Petroleum-based generators use about 0.08 gallons per kWh. So if you used oil to actually produce the power, that generator would use 480,000 gallons of oil. By comparison, even if the fossil-fuel-based turbines somehow magically used a tenth as much oil, that would just mean the oil-based generator uses 479,730 extra gallons instead of 480,000.

In other words, the *tiny* amount of oil changes the greenness of wind farms relative to fossil fuels by about 0.06%, well within any reasonable margin of error.

It’s noise.

For a fraction of the amount of concrete, you get a building that can hold a nuclear pressure vessel that lasts DECADES and uses so little fuel most plants still keep all their spent rods on-site.

A nuclear power plant uses 200,000 to 500,000 tons of concrete and produces a gigawatt of electricity. A utility-scale wind turbine might use 1,500 tons to produce 5 MW. So it’s about the same amount of concrete per megawatt, to within a single-digit factor, depending on the duty cycle of the wind turbine.

And the foundation can usually be reused for the next turbine, so that concrete also lasts many, many decades, typically. They don’t remove the entire structure when they replace the turbine.

Also, you didn’t factor in all the extra concrete for building long-term offsite storage facilities for the nuclear fuel, or the concrete for the sarcophagus if things go sufficiently wrong. :-)

Your 20~30 year claim seems to be the first result and also in AI-generated answers. It goes against what I’ve heard from farmers and ranchers. There’s a lot of advertisement/propaganda scrubbing going on there. The Lonesome Lands podcast is run by ranchers in Colorado and Iowa and they’ve covered the real cost of Wind Turbines before.

If blades are failing after a decade, then either A. something was wrong with them to begin with or B. the company that owns them stopped servicing them after a decade because of expiring tax credits. And that second one actually is plausible, but that’s not a failure of the technology; it’s a failure of U.S. energy policy. Why spend money repairing it when they can wait for it to completely fail and then replace it and then get the tax credit again?

I’m not for gas or oil turbines, nor am I for solar or wind. Nuclear is really the best option and it’s sad all of the plant production was halted decades ago or is being phased out in places like Germany.

I would argue that nuclear power stinks on ice. The cost per kWh is considerably higher than wind, and it requires continuous staffing and oversight to prevent things from going horribly wrong, whereas wind farms are almost entirely passive other than minor routine maintenance until something breaks and has to be replaced. Nuclear also requires transporting dangerous materials by truck or rail to storage sites, requires building storage that can safely contain the spent material for millennia, etc.

Also, every 40 to 80 years, the nuclear plant’s equipment has to be replaced, and all of the removed material is contaminated, which means long-term storage of the reactor, pipes, concrete containment vessel, etc. You can’t even recycle the raw materials like you can with wind, because nobody wants radioactive metal or concrete. And even if your blades are made of a material that can’t be recycled easily, you can still landfill it instead of basically burying the entire plant in a no man’s land for tens of thousands of years. If you think the waste from wind farms is bad, it pales in comparison with the cost and storage requirements for shutting down a nuclear plant.

If we get fusion working at an industrial scale, then we’ll talk, but fission just isn’t worth the hassle when there are other, much cleaner solutions.

Re: We are also paying the Germans 1.2 billion

By caseih • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Better deals? You mean pay double and be happy. Tariffs don’t ever make domestic goods cheaper and more available.

It’s convenient to blame China of course. It’s a lot more palatable than realizing that our own system has screwed us. Because we’re the best in the world and if we can’t do it cheaply and affordably, they must be cheating! Unfair trade! Unfair to the biggest power in the world.

But the simple fact is American companies put you in this situation. China didn’t get ahead because they cheated. They got ahead because American companies deliberately gutted manufacturing and fired workers to improve their bottom line, and China responded to the demand, willing to take slightly lower short-term profits. Tariffs won’t fix this (if it actually is broken). In fact they make it much, much worse. American companies aren’t incentivized to ramp up production and drive down prices. In fact it’s the opposite. With no competition, what capacity you do have will remain the same while prices double and triple. It’s all about that sweet sweet shareholder profit (and CEO pay out). There will never be self sufficiency as long as the Harvard Business School mentality drives corporations. Meanwhile enjoy your massive tax increases that fund an ever-decreasing amount of social services.

That is why things were so bad during COVID.

Re: We are also paying the Germans 1.2 billion

By MachineShedFred • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

And how are we going to domestically manufacture solar panels if you also tariff the inputs to solar panel manufacturing?

Do you expect a completely vertically integrated manufacturing operation to wink into existence where sand and copper ore go in one side, and completed solar panels come out the other? And even if that did exist, where would the copper ore be coming from, and what tariffs are on that?

This is why the tariffs do not fucking work.

Ironic, as usual

By Waccoon • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Let me break the mood by being an actual geek for a second.

It’s weird to hear polysilicon being described as an “ultra-pure” form of silicon, because it’s formed on a silicon wafer without a pure crystal structure. That’s why is high a high level of electrical resistance. It’s actually one of the least pure forms of silicon used in chip production.

But, hey, most of my knowledge of chip production is ancient and dates back to 0.5 micron processes.

AMD Buys AI Chip Startup Taalas That Hardwires AI Models Into Its Silicon

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot
An anonymous reader quotes a report from CNBC:
On Thursday, AMD said it’s entered into an agreement to acquire Taalas, a Toronto-based startup that makes chips for inference. Taalas’ accelerators are customized, or hard-wired for a single AI model, rather than being general purpose. In exchange for that loss of flexibility, Taalas’ technology promises a less-expensive chip that it says can produce output for specific models thousands of times faster than a traditional GPU. An AMD representative declined to provide a purchase price for the transaction. Taalas has raised a total of $219 million in venture funding since its 2023 founding.

Taalas’ current chip runs a small version of Meta’s Llama 3.1 model, though the company is working on chips for bigger and more advanced models. It’s manufactured using an older Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. process, and uses speedy SRAM memory on the chip itself. Taalas CEO Ljubisa Bajic says on the startup’s website that the company “developed a platform for transforming any AI model into custom silicon.” “From the moment a previously unseen model is received, it can be realized in hardware in only two months,” Bajic wrote.

Smaller, on device models are the future

By Registered Coward v2 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Most tasks don’t really need the big cloud based models. While on device models will lack the depth, breadth, and speed of cloud offerings, they have a number of advantages:

Of course, if the silicon gets powerful enough to make local models more commonplace, the AI firms may be more reticent to release stripped down versions for free when they discover it’s no longer the first hit is free model…

Damn their chatbot is fast!

By mileshigh • Score: 4, Informative Thread
Seems to be for real.Tried it on substantial prompts that couldn’t possibly be pre-cached, 100ms response. Translated 1500 words to French in 50ms, and it’s a good translation. Their demo’s just an 8B model for now, but it’s not hard to see how this can scale up. If nothing else, it can have a real-time conversation with no delay. That alone guarantees adoption in all sorts of applications where it interfaces with people. Methinks AMD got itself a bargain.

Re:This will be very niche

By HiThere • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Yeah, quite niche. But it might be a VERY large niche. I see it as handling, among other things, reflexes for robots. Or recognizing voices. We’ve got several “special purpose” AIs native in our brains. One of them processes sounds. Some are simpler than others. Some are more reprogramable. like the reflexes used in playing a piano or driving.

So no software updates then

By LindleyF • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
You’re stuck with the model the chip was built for. The better one released a week later is out of reach.

Re:So no software updates then

By CommunityMember • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

You’re stuck with the model the chip was built for. The better one released a week later is out of reach.

Not all applications need the latest model. So while these chips would not be a good solution for running the frontier models which evolve rapidly, there is a lot of more mundane and stable uses where the dedicated chip might be a viable choice.