Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Walmart’s First Nuclear Deal Shows Demand Beyond AI Data Centers
  2. Bob Iger’s Disney Wanted Apple, Twitter, and 007
  3. Boffin Claims Microsoft’s ‘Quantum Leap’ Is Invalid Due To ‘Basic Python Errors’
  4. Trump Admin Announces $17.5 Billion In Loans For 10 New Large Nuclear Reactors
  5. A 25-Year-Old Blog Looks Back At 40 Years of Computing
  6. Mushroom Behind ‘Tiny Human’ Visions Lacks Genes For Known Psychedelics
  7. Europe: The World’s Fastest-Warming Continent
  8. US AI Stock Sell-Off Shakes Markets From Wall Street To Asia
  9. 29-Year-Old Squid Proxy Bug ‘Squidbleed’ Can Leak Cleartext HTTP Requests
  10. China Reclaims Fastest Supercomputer At 2 Exaflops
  11. Wikipedia Cofounder Larry Sanger Banned From Site for ‘Canvassing’
  12. Walmart, In Biggest Deal In Two Years, Buys Advertising Tech Firm Vibe.co
  13. Mark Zuckerberg Directed Meta To Create a Prediction Markets App
  14. Digital Euro Expected To Launch By 2029 After EU Backing
  15. Meta Launches Cheaper Smart Glasses Without Ray-Ban

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Walmart’s First Nuclear Deal Shows Demand Beyond AI Data Centers

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Barron’s:
Walmart is signing a long-term contract to buy nuclear power for the first time ever, a promising sign that the industry’s future is supported by more than just the AI data center boom. The retail giant agreed on Tuesday to buy power from a nuclear plant in Illinois owned by Constellation Energy for its operations in the area, including its stores and a high-tech warehouse in Illinois that stores and sorts perishable food.

Walmart will buy 176 megawatts of power from the plant over a 15-year period, or enough power to serve around 150,000 homes. The Walmart deal will allow Constellation to expand the capacity of the Illinois plant by 30 megawatts, a process known as an uprate, which can involve replacing older equipment and improving efficiency. Walmart, which has pledged to eliminate net carbon emissions from its U.S. operations by 2040, will also receive the environmental attributes associated with the nuclear energy, which generates electricity without carbon emissions.
Further reading: Trump Admin Announces $17.5 Billion In Loans For 10 New Large Nuclear Reactors

Bob Iger’s Disney Wanted Apple, Twitter, and 007

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
In an exit interview with The Financial Times (paywalled), former Disney CEO Bob Iger says the company seriously considered buying Twitter, explored a potential merger with Apple, and pursued the James Bond franchise during his tenure. The Verge reports:
According to Iger, Disney came close to buying Twitter from co-founder Jack Dorsey “at a very attractive price,” sometime prior to Elon Musk buying the social media platform in 2022 and changing its name to X. Iger had plans to turn Twitter into a global distribution platform for Disney, but walked away on the morning of the deal over concerns that it would be “a horrible distraction.”

Disney was also at one point involved in early conversations regarding a potential merger with Apple, something Iger thinks would have been “truly transformational.” In the end, Iger says these conversations “never went anywhere,” and that “Apple didn’t show that much interest.” The two companies have a mixed history — Iger was an Apple board member from 2011 to 2019, and notably a driving force behind Disney acquiring Pixar in 2006, which was led by Apple co-founder Steve Jobs at the time. According to Iger, his first call with Jobs resulted in an almost immediate deal to put Disney content on the first video iPod. “All of a sudden, I’m now someone Steve likes and respects,” Iger told The Financial Times. “The old Disney that he knew was lumbering in terms of bureaucracy. And so he thought, this is a new day.”

The Pixar acquisition spurred Iger to find more companies to bring under Disney’s wing, though not every attempt was successful. “We felt unstoppable. We put together a list of acquisition targets,” said Iger. “Marvel was one, Star Wars was another, James Bond was one. We had a list and I figured let’s just tick them off and buy them all.” Iger provides no details about Disney’s attempt to buy the James Bond franchise, but we know it obviously failed — Amazon bought the 007 distribution rights when it acquired MGM in 2022, and later paid more than $1 billion to take full creative control of the franchise in February 2025.

Boffin Claims Microsoft’s ‘Quantum Leap’ Is Invalid Due To ‘Basic Python Errors’

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
A peer-reviewed Nature critique argues that Microsoft’s 2025 Majorana quantum-computing breakthrough — and its claim that it could enable “a truly meaningful quantum computer not in decades, as some have predicted, but in years” — is fundamentally flawed. According to Dr Henry Legg, a lecturer at the University of St Andrews, the claims were undermined by omitted data, selective plotting, and basic Python errors that concealed alternative results. Microsoft, for its part, says the bugs were minor and stands by its findings and roadmap. The Register reports:
“Last year they claimed to be years, not decades from a ‘topological quantum supercomputer,’" Legg told The Register in an email. “My feeling is that they are centuries, not decades away. If it works at all — and, based on what I have seen, the most likely scenario is that it doesn’t work.” Based on his analysis of the research Microsoft published in 2025, Legg argues that the company’s claims about finding and being able to control the elusive Majorana particle to build a topological superconductor do not withstand scrutiny.

“I demonstrate that Microsoft’s tune-up software is flawed and that coding errors resulted in incorrect statements to peer reviewers,” said Legg. “Raw data, which was omitted from the original paper, also appears to indicate Microsoft’s devices contain considerable disorder and are not compatible with the existence of a topological gap. In other words, the prerequisites for Microsoft’s claims do not appear to be met, but this was obscured because this data did not appear in the original publication.”

Essentially, Microsoft has proposed a Topological Gap Protocol (TGP) that can be used to detect the phase transition deemed to be a prerequisite for conducting quantum calculations using Majorana particles. Legg argues that based on his analysis of underlying transport data (measurements of particle change) — omitted from the original publication — Microsoft chose to focus on results that supported its thesis and ignored data that could be interpreted as a negative result. As he notes in his critique: “The TGP plotting code was set to highlight only the largest purportedly topological region.”

“The primary consequence was the omission of other regions that passed their tune-up protocol (the TGP),” said Legg. “When peer reviewers asked if other regions existed, Microsoft inaccurately stated that they had investigated the only region passing the protocol within the explored range. This was not correct.” Legg also argues that Microsoft mishandled its code. “The code antisymmetrized bias voltage based on array index rather than physical value,” his analysis says.

In other words, Microsoft’s researchers made a basic programming mistake by evaluating the array index — the number identifying a value’s position in an array — instead of the value to which the index refers. “There were two pretty basic Python programming errors that hid these alternative regions,” Legg explained. “Their plotting software was hardcoded with a filter (zbp_cluster_numbers=[1]) that forced it to display only the single largest region, concealing other successful results from their phase maps. Changing this to zbp_cluster_numbers=[1,2] shows already a second region.” Legg added: “The TGP software transformed the data by simply reversing a Python array (x[::-1]) based on its index position, ignoring the actual physical bias voltages.”

Quantum Leap is invalid?

By 93 Escort Wagon • Score: 4, Funny Thread

Quick! Somebody call Scott Bakula!

“the most likely scenario is that it doesn’t work”

By gweihir • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

At this time, this is the only rational stance left. There is no indication that QCs can ever scale to useful size, but a ton of indicators that they likely will not. There is not even solid proof that QCs work at all, because the longest, most complex complex calculation ever done successfully is apparently factoring 29 with a specialized algorithm for 29. That is easily in range for a conventional analog computation by non-quantum mechanisms. Hence while I think it is unlikely, the computation mechanisms that QCs rely on may still turn out to be hallucinations. Also note that even very, very, very minor deviations from the theory (and we _always_ had those in the past as soon as we had equipment to verify theory against reality precisely enough) would completely kill the QC idea. The precision required to do, say, a 128 bit calculation precisely, is unimaginable and a digital computer only reaches it by extreme measures.

Boffin

By Himmy32 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

A quick perusal of his published papers seems that boffin would even be understatement, but a well published researcher who is wholly dedicated to this field of research. And whose papers are appear to be written with well respected researchers in the field like this one and several others written with Daniel Loss.

From the Daniel Loss article:

His 1998 paper (jointly with David DiVincenzo) proposing the use of spin qubits in semiconductor quantum dots is the foundation of one of the main approaches towards the realization of a quantum computer and (as of 2025) has been cited more than 9000 times.

This doesn’t appear to be a critique that should be easily dismissed, guy clearly knows his stuff.

Python ?

By randalware • Score: 3 Thread

Quantum computing uses Python ?

You would think the most advanced CPU would use a compiled language....

C, assembly, Fortran, etc

not Basic, Perl or Lisp

But what if?

By Reeses • Score: 3 Thread

I’m just waiting for the day when I can have a Beowulf cluster of Majorna chips to simulate Natalie Portman and some hot grits.

Trump Admin Announces $17.5 Billion In Loans For 10 New Large Nuclear Reactors

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from the Associated Press:
The Trump administration is providing $17.5 billion to speed the development of 10 new large nuclear reactors to meet the skyrocketing power demand from massive data centers. Energy Secretary Chris Wright cited “tremendous interest” among developers of data centers that would buy the power, as well as utilities and energy companies. The nuclear plants could begin construction by 2030 and become operational in the mid-2030s, Wright and other officials said Tuesday. “This is the start,” Wright said on a call with reporters. “We’re going to move with the players that are ready to stand up and move quickly. Once that supply chain is up and running, do we think there will be dozens of these built going forward? I’d be very surprised if there were not.”

Most U.S. nuclear power plants were built between 1970 and 1990. Only two new large reactors have been built from scratch in the United States in recent decades. Those two reactors, at Georgia Power Co.‘s Plant Vogtle, were completed years late and billions of dollars over budget. The 10 new reactors will use the same design, Westinghouse’s AP1000. Wright said the Plant Vogtle project struggled because of bad planning, supply chain problems and the COVID-19 pandemic. But, he said, the reactor design is “robust and sound.”

We need them, but

By SumDog • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
The US desperately does need more nuclear power plants. Browns Ferry finally got all three of their reactors online after one was down for decades. But I hate it’s because of this data center bullshit. At least that will mean we’ll have more, cheaper, cleaner power after the AI bust. These data centers need to stop. They’re destroying all the small communities filled with people who intentionally wanted to get away from industrial and city bullshit.

Sadly I’m sure the same massive building campaigns will happen with reactors. This will also suck for rural people who don’t want these reactors in their community. I guess the saving grace is that nuclear sites don’t have the massive noise pollution that data centers do.

Honestly there is so much room around Comanche Nuclear (it has a massive man made reservoir instead of using river water) they could easily expand it to 4 or 6 units without much issue.

5 years to completion?

By ArchieBunker • Score: 3 Thread

No way in hell is a nuclear plant being built in 5 years. Check the timeline https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…

Blame Japan and TBH yourselves

By oumuamua • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
There was a nuclear renaissance in progress until the Fukushima accident derailed it completely. Everyone screamed ‘Oh the horrible risk of nuclear power we don’t need it’. Yes it was bad and expensive but if you looked at it rationally and with perspective, statistically nuclear was still safer than almost every other power source. Where is Japan now? It has restarted or restarting the reactors it closed down after the accident https://www.bbc.com/news/artic…

A 25-Year-Old Blog Looks Back At 40 Years of Computing

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Ancient Slashdot reader Mark Round writes:
Longtime reader here (since mid-1999 — Hot Grits! Oog the Caveman! Beowulf clusters!), and I can still remember posting back on Slashdot’s own 5th anniversary. Time’s rolled on: my own blog just turned 25, and it’s now roughly 40 years since I first sat down at a computer. So I went digging through archive.org, old backups, and a box of ZIP disks, and wrote up a long look back at four decades of computing through the one website that’s been my online home along the way.

It runs from my first 8-bit micro and a 1,200-baud modem through discovering the actual Internet at university (and burning far too many hours on Slashdot and sister sites like freshmeat.net), past gloriously pimped-out Enlightenment Linux desktops, all the way to the modern cloud-native world. Plenty of dodgy screenshots, terrible code, and fond memories of long-gone haunts like kuro5hin.org and Linux Coffee Talk along the way.

First Post!

By Mark Round • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Front page of Slashdot after 25 years, and First Post. Life goal unlocked!

Re:First Post!

By Brian Kendig • Score: 4, Funny Thread

Pah, all you kids get off my lawn.

Re:First Post!

By Known Nutter • Score: 4, Funny Thread
Frost Piss!!!

Get off my lawn

By RogueWarrior65 • Score: 3 Thread

1200 baud?! Feh. I started with a 110 baud acoustic coupler modem on a Teletype 110 that operated at a whopping 11 characters per second.

Mushroom Behind ‘Tiny Human’ Visions Lacks Genes For Known Psychedelics

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
alternative_right shares a report from ScienceAlert:
If you consumed a wild mushroom and suddenly started seeing tiny people around you, you might reasonably assume it contained a familiar psychedelic. But that does not appear to be the case with Lanmaoa asiatica, known locally as jian shou qing, a mushroom species sold in markets in Yunnan, southwestern China. When eaten undercooked, the mushroom can produce vivid visions of miniature people — not unlike Gulliver on his travels to Lilliput. To try and find out the root cause, University of Utah mycologists Colin Domnauer and Bryn Dentinger sequenced the genomes of 53 mushroom samples from across the wider Lanmaoa genus. And despite the reported hallucinations, they found no close matches to genes associated with psilocybin or ibotenic acid, two well-known mushroom hallucinogens whose biosynthetic pathways were specifically examined in the study.

“Biosynthetic gene mining of the L. asiatica genome found no close hits with any genes known in the production of mushroom psychoactive compounds,” write the researchers in their published paper. “This supports our hypothesis of the presence of a novel unidentified metabolite responsible for the unique hallucinogenic properties of L. asiatica.” […] Whatever chemical pathways are causing these effects in the brain, the responsible compound appears to be something scientists have not yet identified. […] By identifying 1,515 corresponding genes across the selected specimens, the researchers obtained a clearer answer to the question of what defines a mushroom species as part of the genus Lanmaoa. There are now 17 recognized species in the genus, including four that haven’t been identified before, two of which the researchers specifically named here: Lanmaoa fallax and Lanmaoa carbonilivor. The researchers say the Lanmaoa family and evolutionary tree can now be more fully mapped out, and some existing specimens may need to be reclassified.

What if it filters certain visible frequencies

By syntap • Score: 5, Funny Thread

revealing that the tiny people are actually there?

Ancestor worship

By Okian Warrior • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

do these substances bring out a reality not normally visable, or do they make the brain invent these things. if so where or what is the brain getting the info from ? Why do multiple people report the same things ? (suggesting external input not self generated ?

The mushrooms are almost certainly not making an invisible aspect of reality visible.

That being said, this report is very interesting from an anthropological point of view: ancestor worship.

The report doesn’t say whether the tiny people were recognized by the viewer (and I couldn’t find any references), but this effect might have been the source of ancestor worship among the people of southeast Asia, where the mushroom grows.

Ancestor worship and animism (belief that the spirits of things hang around after death) might have its roots in this sort of psychedelic experience.

This.

By Petersko • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

In my younger days, the list of psychedelics I tried was pretty lengthy. And I never had a single bad trip. Not one. I was always joked while not joking that the stereotyped hallucinations always eluded me. I wanted to see elves peeking at me from behind bushes. But no matter how deep I went - and I went 800 mcg of LSD deep - the hallucinations topped off at melty, wooshy, and emotionally bizarre and impactful. I never hallucinated specific, coherent events or individuals.

Well, here it is. I would return from a 25 year hiatus to try that.

Reality?

By jpatters • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Of course this invites the wacky hypothesis that the mushrooms enable the person eating them to perceive something that is real but hidden somehow. I propose to test this by having multiple people take it in the same time and place, and then independently produce detailed descriptions of the specific tiny people that they see. They will either match or they won’t, and then we’ll have the answer.

We must get to the bottom of this!

Re:reconstruction ?

By znrt • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

your entire perception of reality is actually a controlled hallucination. your brain literally invents reality from external stumuli: photons, waves and particles in the air, etc. mixed with your own past experiences.

substances (and other particular circumstances) can trigger connections in your brain that cause your perception to change, or even runs amok. my (uninformed) guess is that these shrooms somehow trigger areas of the brain involved in shape recognition, and human shapes in particular. there is quite a bit of medical literature about people consistently hallucinating very specific stuff.

Europe: The World’s Fastest-Warming Continent

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
fjo3 shares a report from the AFP:
The latest heatwave sweeping across Europe is a stark reminder that it is the world’s fastest-warming continent, stretching into an Arctic that is heating at an even greater pace. Britain, France, Italy and Spain have issued red alerts and health warnings for much of their territory this week as the region endures its second heat episode since May.

Here is a look at why Europe is warming faster than elsewhere: The planet as a whole is around 1.4C warmer than in preindustrial times, defined as 1850-1900. By comparison, Europe is around 2.4C hotter than the preindustrial era, according to the EU’s Copernicus Climate Change Service. The long-term rise in global average temperatures is mainly due to greenhouse gas emissions from burning oil, gas and coal, but it varies by regions due to a combination of factors. Land warms faster than the ocean as water can absorb more heat and cool through evaporation.

Shifts in atmospheric circulation have driven more frequent and more intense heatwaves in the European summer, according to Copernicus. High-pressure systems, which bring settled weather and higher temperatures, have become more common in Europe, Copernicus director Carlo Buontempo said. […] Another major reason is geography as Europe is connected to the Arctic, which is 3.2C warmer than in preindustrial times. The region’s rising temperatures are partly due to a process known as the albedo feedback. Bright snow and ice reflect much of the sun’s heat back into space, but as they melt they reveal darker, heat-absorbing surfaces such as land and the ocean.

In other parts of Europe, areas where snow was very frequent in winter have seen this coverage shrink, exposing dark land. Stricter air quality regulations have reduced aerosol emissions since the 1980s. But tackling the pollutant had the side effect of contributing to global warming, as these tiny airborne particles have a cooling effect by reflecting sunlight and making clouds more reflective.

Right now the real temperature here …

By Qbertino • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

… in Europe is roughly 5 degrees centigrade above worst case scenarios projected for the year 2050 back in 2016. Germany will likely crack the 40 degree mark in multiple locations at the end of this week. Once again a new heat record. I personally expect this to only get more intense in the next years until perhaps the gulf stream completely shuts down.

These are cascading effects kicking in and ramping up. It wouldn’t stop if the planet went net-zero carbon tomorrow. So we’re pretty f*cked, as predicted ever since 1970. I’m curious how hard though. Guess we’ll find out soon.

Re:Hot or cold? Make your minds up!

By AmiMoJo • Score: 5, Informative Thread

The UK wasn’t built to survive hot, humid weather. We need urgent reform of planning laws so that people can fix their homes with things like exterior shutters on windows. The push to install heat pumps should focus on air-to-air with cooling capability.

In Japan, where they have hot and humid months, the advice is to design your house for the summer. You will be a bit cold in winter, but that’s far better than being extremely hot and humid in the summer.

Re:Wasn’t it supposed to cool down?

By brunes69 • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

AVERAGE temperature matters.

The gulf stream is a moderator. It keeps Britian and eastern Europe warmer in the winter than it deserves to be, but in the summer, has little effect.

What we are seeing now is a heat dome over the summer. IE, the AVERAGE ANNUAL temperature of Europe is going up, not the daily temperature.

If and when the gulf stream shuts down what will happen is Britian and western Europe will freeze in the winter.. in fact it may start to become covered in ice. Go look at any globe and look at where Britian exists compared to Russia and Canada, it is further north than Labrador. For all rights, it should be fozen in ice all winter. The reason it is mild, is because of the gulf stream.

Re:Right now the real temperature here …

By Arrogant-Bastard • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
About 25 years ago, I began to take a serious interest in climatology. I started buying textbooks and reading them - and for the most part, that went smoothly, because I could easily understand the math and physics. (I struggled a bit with some of the organic chemistry, and had to spend a couple of years coming up to speed on that.) After a while, I could read all the reports and some of the papers being published, so I made my way through things like the IPCC reports — which are thousands of pages. Eventually, I got to the point where I could read almost anything published in the field — but admittedly, some of the material still takes me a long time to get through.

And the single biggest takeaway from all that work is: climatologists, as a field, have been consistently underestimating how bad things are and how bad they’re going to get. This is because they’re scientists, and all scientists are trained to be conservative in their assessments. Whereas a non-scientist might write “X proves Y”, a good scientist will write something like “X suggests that Y may be happening” or the equivalent. This approach implicitly acknowledges uncertainty and the possibility that future work will yield different results: it’s how science self-corrects over time.

This mindset is commendable: it shows intellectual honestly. But unfortunately in this particular discipline, at this particular time, it doesn’t ring the alarm bells loudly enough. We need a Samuel L. Jackson moment: “The world is on fire, mXXXXrfXXXXXrs” We need radical changes, e.g. all fossil fuel production and consumption must end. We need vast reductions in energy consumption. We need sweeping societal changes, e.g., an end to daily commuting as the norm, it should be an exception. And even if we do all of that, it may still not be enough, because this is an exponential process with a huge amount of momentum — in other words, we’re going to keep sliding up the curve for some period of time even if we do everything that we should have done decades ago.

I’ve said, for all these years, that I’m not going to live to see the hellscape that’s coming - the mass starvation, the killer megastorms, the wars over water, the refugee crises, the political, economic, and societal chaos. Now I’m not so sure.

It’s all the immigrants.

By Petersko • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

I mean, they’re flooding across the borders at the same time as the temperature is rising. That’s got to be causal, right? And a lot of them are darker than most white folks. Everybody knows dark bodies retain more heat - there’s your mechanism. Albedo’s a bitch, am I right? Letting your daughter bring one into your home definitely means you need air conditioning.

US AI Stock Sell-Off Shakes Markets From Wall Street To Asia

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Guardian:
A tech sell-off shook global markets on Tuesday as attention turned away from developments in the US war with Iran and toward the future of AI companies and chipmakers that have driven stock markets to record highs. The tech-heavy Nasdaq index closed 2.2% lower on Tuesday. The S&P 500 was also down by Tuesday afternoon, dropping 1.43% while the Dow remained steady. All three major US indices have hit record highs this year, riding off a rush of funding to support AI technology and infrastructure. Nasdaq is up 10% for the year, while the Dow jumped 6% so far this year, breaching past 51,000 points, and the S&P 500 is up 7.3%.

But some economists have warned that the influx of AI spending is a bubble reminiscent of the dot-com bubble that burst in the early 2000s. Seven tech companies make up 30% of the S&P 500’s value. The heavy reliance on a single industry and a few key companies has some investors wondering if it’s a matter of when, not if, there will be a burst. Those concerns have been heightened by signals from the Federal Reserve last week that it may increase interest rates, and therefore the cost of borrowing, in order to tackle rising inflation.
Alphabet fell 5% on Monday. SpaceX plunged 16%. The selloff also spread to Asia, with South Korea’s benchmark dropping 10% as SK Hynix and Samsung Electronics each lost more than 12%, while Japan’s Nikkei 225 declined 3.5%.

POP!

By PhantomHarlock • Score: 5, Funny Thread

…and nothing of value was lost.

Another symptom

By ishmaelflood • Score: 3 Thread

Spacex $1.7T

The word this morning 24 Jun. 2026:

By gtall • Score: 3 Thread

Bloomberg is reporting that Asian stocks have rebounded this morning, and that rebound seems be from shift investment portfolios somewhat (only somewhat) away from AI stocks. A similar mood seems to be apparent on Wall Street where NASDAQ futures are up 8/10 %.

It would seem this is not the AI apocalypse but rather some cold feet towards companies that have massive capital expenditures on AI. Elmo’s government supported company has lost some steam also. Fascism is fascinating for its adherents.

Re:The world economy destroyed,

By Black Parrot • Score: 4, Informative Thread

It’s just too big to fail.

In a free country, “too big to fail” is to big to be allowed.

B.S. Story - Insignificant Decrease

By JakFrost • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Yeah the tiny little bump down is not the start of the AI bubble bursting, not just yet. The little blip on Tuesday got wiped out on Wednesday and it’s back to normal with some reshifting of investments in Asia.

Except for SpaceX which is now dropping back to its $150 opening IPO price to the public. It’s going to bounce back up but once again in insignificant single digit percentage increases which means that even with the upcoming increase just by a few percentage points, it makes no difference to retail investors since you can’t swing enough volume to actually make a reasonable profit on it.

When I was younger watching the Dow Jones industrial average hit 10,000 was a massive event. And then it hits 20,000 followed by $30,000 and now it’s at 51, 000. So if I took the money that I had when I was younger and working and saving money and just left it invested in that index? Or just a total stock index? Or even a technology index? I could have retired by now but that money got used on life and other things and and it didn’t stay invested. So compound interest and all the growth in the last few decades didn’t happen.

29-Year-Old Squid Proxy Bug ‘Squidbleed’ Can Leak Cleartext HTTP Requests

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
A 29-year-old bug in the Squid web proxy, dubbed Squidbleed and tracked as CVE-2026-47729, can let an authorized proxy user retrieve fragments of another user’s cleartext HTTP requests, including credentials and session tokens. The security researcher who reported the flaw credited Anthropic’s Claude Mythos Preview for the discovery. The Hacker News reports:
Squid describes this as an attack by a trusted client: someone already permitted to use the proxy, not any random host on the internet. That matches Squid’s usual home, shared networks like schools, offices, and public Wi-Fi. In those setups, the attacker is just another user of the same proxy. The leak also only reaches traffic that Squid can read. Normal HTTPS rides an opaque CONNECT tunnel, so Squid never sees inside it; the exposed traffic is cleartext HTTP, plus TLS-terminating setups where Squid decrypts and inspects. The attacker also needs the proxy to reach an FTP server they control on port 21. Both FTP and that port are on by default.

[…] If you patch, verify the fix, not just the version. Confirm the guard is in FtpGateway.cc, or check your distribution’s backport, since distros ship their own builds (Debian packages Squid 5.7). The public thread is still inconsistent: maintainer Amos Jeffries first said Squid 7.6 carried the fix, then corrected that to 7.7, and on June 22 Debian’s Salvatore Bonaccorso noted the referenced commit looks like it is already in 7.6. The fix is small, a null-terminator check before the vulnerable strchr calls, merged to the development branch in April and v7 in May. Squid 7.6 does separately patch CVE-2026-50012, an unrelated cache_digest heap overflow.

The cleaner move is the one the researchers recommend anyway: turn FTP off. Chromium dropped FTP years ago, and most networks carry almost none of it, so disabling it removes this attack surface for free, whatever build you run. The risk is real but bounded. SUSE rates it moderate, CVSS 6.5, and the vector explains the score: the attacker needs proxy access (low privileges), and the only impact is confidentiality, nothing on integrity or availability.

TFS left out that Mythos AI hepled uncover the bug

By williamyf • Score: 3 Thread

Two things can be true at the same time.

Yes, is true that AI is a bubble, and is over-hyped.
Yet, is also true that AI has an important and valuable role to play in software development.

But you do not have to trust me, as I am some internet rando, instead, trust trustworthy (redundancy intended) people like:

Linus Torvalds:

On the positive side, he framed AI-discovered bugs as “short-term pain” with long-term benefits: “When AI finds a bug in any source code… long term is you found a bug, we fixed it, that the end result is better for it.” After all, he continued, “I think finding bugs is great, because the real problem is all the bugs you didn’t find…”

https://linux.slashdot.org/sto…

Greg K-H:

It’s not just Linux, he continued. “All open source projects have real reports that are made with AI, but they’re good, and they’re real.” Security teams across major open source projects talk informally and frequently, he noted, and everyone is seeing the same shift. “All open source security teams are hitting this right now....”

For now, AI is showing up more as a reviewer and assistant than as a full author of Linux kernel code, but that line is starting to blur. Kroah-Hartman has already done his own experiments with AI-generated patches. “I did a really stupid prompt,” he recounted. “I said, ‘Give me this,’ and it spit out 60: ‘Here’s 60 problems I found, and here’s the fixes for them.’ About one-third were wrong, but they still pointed out a relatively real problem, and two-thirds of the patches were right.” Mind you, those working patches still needed human cleanup, better changelogs, and integration work, but they were far from useless. “The tools are good,” he said. “We can’t ignore this stuff. It’s coming up, and it’s getting better....” [H]e said that for “simple little error conditions, properly detecting error conditions,” AI could already generate dozens of usable patches today.

https://linux.slashdot.org/sto…

The Firefox team:

We view this as clear evidence that large-scale, AI-assisted analysis is a powerful new addition in security engineers’ toolbox. Firefox has undergone some of the most extensive fuzzing, static analysis, and regular security review over decades. Despite this, the model was able to reveal many previously unknown bugs. This is analogous to the early days of fuzzing; there is likely a substantial backlog of now-discoverable bugs across widely deployed software.

https://news.slashdot.org/stor…

Please also notice that the source of the links and its comunity is not particularly AI friendly, so… … So, again, two things can be true at the same time…

Re:TFS left out that Mythos AI hepled uncover the

By JoshuaZ • Score: 4, Informative Thread
Huh? Summary says explicitly “The security researcher who reported the flaw credited Anthropic’s Claude Mythos Preview for the discovery” so where are you getting that the summary didn’t note this?

China Reclaims Fastest Supercomputer At 2 Exaflops

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Longtime Slashdot reader hackingbear shares a report from TOP500:
The 67th edition of the TOP500 list of the world’s most powerful supercomputers was announced today at the ISC 2026 conference in Hamburg, Germany. LineShine, a previously unlisted system installed in China, debuts at No. 1, displacing El Capitan as the world’s most powerful supercomputer as measured by the High Performance Linpack (HPL) benchmark. LineShine achieved 2.198 Exaflop/s on HPL — about 80 percent of its 2.736 Exaflop/s theoretical peak — making it the first system on the TOP500 to exceed two exaflops of sustained double-precision performance using CPUs only.

Installed at the National Supercomputing Centre in Shenzhen (NSCS) and built by the Shenzhen Cloud Computing Center, the system is based on a custom Chinese processor and the “LingKun” platform: 13.79 million cores across 304-core LX2 processors running at 1.55 GHz, linked by the proprietary LingQi interconnect and running Kylin OS. LineShine draws approximately 42.2 megawatts of power, for an efficiency of 52.07 Gigaflops/Watt. Its debut marks the first time since 2017 that a Chinese system has led the TOP500, and it also takes over the No. 1 position on the HPCG ranking with 22.00 HPCG-Petaflop/s. On the HPL-MxP mixed-precision benchmark, LineShine reached 7.92 Exaflop/s for fourth place, a comparatively modest 3.6x speedup over its HPL score that points to a CPU-only design without dedicated low-precision accelerators.
While impressive, “the results may say more about Beijing’s desire to show self-sufficiency in computing systems than its standing in the global AI race,” reports Reuters.
Reuters interviewed tech and policy experts who said that the results “do not mean that China has the world’s fastest computer for AI work because of changes in the computing industry in recent years and the methods used to compile the list.” The reports notes that LineShine “ranked fourth on a benchmark test designed to simulate computing work that is more similar to AI.”

Jimmy Goodrich, a senior fellow at the University of California’s Institute for Global Conflict and Cooperation, said: “If the hyperscalers submitted their systems, this ‘world’s fastest’ would not crack the top five.” Addison Snell, CEO of Intersect360 Research, a firm that focuses on supercomputers, added: “I’m not surprised it’s the number one system. What I’m surprised by is that they submitted it and want recognition for it.”

US water cooled super computer

By Anonymous Coward • Score: 5, Funny Thread

The obvious choice is to build a super computer under the reflecting pool. Using the amazing pumps and clean water to provide algae-free computing and beating both China and Russia. USA USA USA

Thank you for your attention in this matter.

Chinese Tech

By sit1963nz • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Seems like China as not as dependant on US technology as the US thought

Re:Shockingly powered by…

By ArchieBunker • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Congrats on 15 year old propaganda. Today they can build better quality cars faster and cheaper. And before you open your yap about safety, these vehicles pass EU safety standards which are more stringent than what the USA requires.

Re: Yawn

By arglebargle_xiv • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Yup. If it hadn’t been for Trump’s idiotic sanctions it’d be a Chinese computer made with US chips and money going to US companies. The PRC should give him some sort of science innovation award for the huge boost he’s given their domestic chip industry.

Re:Chinese Tech

By excelsior_gr • Score: 5, Informative Thread
“LineShine uses semi-custom 304-core LX2 processors based on the Armv9 instruction set architecture running at 1.55GHz. The LX2 appears to have been co-designed with China’s National Supercomputing Center and Huawei, with 40,960 chips deployed across 92 cabinets. It has a total of 13,789,440 cores.” From: https://www.datacenterdynamics…

Wikipedia Cofounder Larry Sanger Banned From Site for ‘Canvassing’

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Wikipedia cofounder Larry Sanger has been indefinitely banned from editing the site after editors concluded that he violated its canvassing rules, “or in other words, calling on his followers off platform in order to influence Wikipedia’s content,” reports 404 Media. Sanger says the ban proves Wikipedia suppresses ideological diversity, while editors argue he was trying to mobilize an outside audience to influence internal decisions and had ignored an earlier warning. From the report:
The discussion that led to the decision to ban Sanger concluded with what an editor called a “clear consensus” to ban Sanger. “There is general agreement among participants that he has engaged in off-wiki canvassing and is not here to constructively build the encyclopedia,” the editor said in a note closing the discussion. “There is also a significant concern shared by many editors that his actions constitute calls for outing.”

While Sanger has been railing about bias on Wikipedia for years, the specific issue here is around his WikiProject Intellectual Diversity. WikiProjects are group efforts among Wikipedia volunteers to deal with certain issues on the site. […] Sanger’s WikiProject Intellectual Diversity, as its name implies, aims to bring more intellectual diversity to the site, mostly meaning more right-leaning perspectives. Sanger’s WikiProject Intellectual Diversity and its goals alone do not merit a ban according to Wikipedia’s policies. The problem, according to Wikipedia editors, is that during the discussion about whether to allow WikiProject Intellectual Diversity to become an official WikiProject, Sanger invited his 91,000 followers on X to influence that discussion.

Discussions about potential bans are supposed to remain open for at least 72 hours. While consensus that Sanger had violated Wikipedia policies was clear, Sanger was banned at some point before that deadline. He was then briefly unbanned, and then again indefinitely banned once 72 hours had elapsed and the discussion about the ban closed. “Wikipedia has become more of a mob-rule anarchy than ever,” Sanger said in a statement sent to me by a spokesperson. “In the kangaroo court in which a mob ousted me, Wikipedia’s administrators showed that they don’t appear to value details like formal charges, a designated prosecutor, basic decorum, distinction between prosecution and judge, dispassionate adjudication, and so forth. They have no proper system other than triggering a mob to selectively enforce their hodgepodge of vague rules.”

“Now that same mob has blocked me for trying to bring an intellectually diverse group of thinkers and editors to the site,” Sanger continued. “Subscribing to their groupthink is now an official requirement of being a member in good standing. Something must change, and now. I only wonder if the system as it currently stands can even allow the discourse necessary to fix the system.”

Re: Don’t jump to conclusions

By reanjr • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Science is intrinsically progressive and anti-conservative. It is used to develop new knowledge that overturns existing knowledge. Inasmuch as progressive=left and conservative=right, truth has a left leaning bias. That said, left does not always equal progressive and right doesn’t always equal conservative.

Re: Sanger’s Wikipedia page

By jddj • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Couple-three answers:

1. No, of course not.

2. More and more it describes where Republicans are being let by the nose, away from traditional conservative topics, which _certainly should have a place in any informed and putatively neutral discussion. Why the right has turned to bullshit sauce lately is beyond me. They used to have ideas worth discussing. Not just lies, hate and bigotry. Look at the leaders. They’re flacking this.

3. These lunatic topics (including climate change denial, which someone else was kind enough to point out) are what’s being excluded when someone plays the “left-wing-bias” tune. For people making this noise “left-wing-bias” is stiff that looks like factual science-backed fairly neutral reporting. Y’know, like we used to have before the world went nuts.

Re:The Hive mind

By sg_oneill • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

If you look at the climate change denial page you can see the hive mind in action.

Seems pretty factual and unbiased to me?

People keep thinking truth and science should be “balanced” and “fair” , but reality doesn’t work by that. A scientific truth doesn’t have sides and it doesnt function by debate. A thing is true or it isn’t, and while the scientific process is a fundamentally statistical beast, its always been a process of pushing the knowledge curve against well defined asympotes. Its never had an obligation to pay attention to the opinions of the illeducated or dishonest. Because science doesnt deal with opinions, it deals with experiments and results.

Debates are for social media not scientific discourse. Sure there are robust exchanges of conflicting papers and studies where uncertainty exists, but it bears no resemblance to the shouty name calling and exchange of thought-terminating cliches that dominate social media. Science doesnt debate, and neither does wikipedia. The truth is not democratic.

Re: Don’t jump to conclusions

By martin-boundary • Score: 5, Informative Thread
“Fox News” isn’t about having a different approach. It’s about artificially equalizing bullshit extreme viewpoints with mainstream educated viewpoints. American media (and American viewers) have suffered from this policy for decades now. It’s why debates about flat earth, climate change, evolution etc exist endemically in that country.

Re: Don’t jump to conclusions

By thegarbz • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

It isn’t “bad mouthing” an ideology to clearly indicate the consistent ideological association of that ideology with state-sponsored genocide.

Yet another person doesn’t know what Socialism is. May I suggest reading the Wikipedia entry instead of Fox News?

Walmart, In Biggest Deal In Two Years, Buys Advertising Tech Firm Vibe.co

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Walmart is acquiring self-serve connected-TV ad platform Vibe.co for a reported $1.4 billion, adding it to an advertising ecosystem that already includes smart-TV maker Vizio. AdExchanger reports:
On Tuesday, Walmart announced that it is buying Vibe.co, the French self-serve ad platform that specializes in helping small brands buy streaming commercials with similar ease and precision as they get from search and social. Vibe has been vying for a bigger share of the ad dollars moving to connected TV, especially in the US, as evidenced by the company’s ubiquitous billboards in major cities including New York and San Francisco. Now, Vibe joins Walmart Connect’s commerce ecosystem alongside the smart TV maker Vizio. And Vibe’s tech is poised to help unify Walmart’s growing CTV footprint with the closed-loop attribution provided by its retail sales data.

[…] Together, Walmart and Vibe.co strive to “build the best ecosystem for the performance TV market,” Vibe CEO and Co-Founder Arthur Querou told AdExchanger. Performance CTV has a high ceiling for growth. The performance budgets dedicated for streaming platforms are still small potatoes compared to search and social, Querou said. Only one-quarter of CTV ad campaigns have lower-funnel objectives, and that number has been static for years, according to data from Advertiser Perceptions. Now that Walmart owns both Vibe and Vizio, advertisers should have an easier time tying streaming campaigns to shopper data. That promise stands to win Walmart more marketing dollars earmarked for retail media and streaming behemoths — including Amazon.

Walmart is especially interested in attracting more small- and medium-sized businesses (SMBs) who lack the tools, budgets or teams to invest in streaming TV, a Walmart spokesperson told AdExchanger. Other ad platforms, including MNTN and Magnite, have likewise targeted SMB advertisers as a source for continued growth in the CTV market. By adding Vibe.co, Walmart can court SMBs with the pitch that its new self-serve tools will make it easier for them to execute CTV campaigns. Plus, SMBs tend to prioritize performance campaigns, since they are under more pressure to justify tighter ad budgets and thus have to be more selective about which platforms they advertise on. And Walmart is better positioned than most platforms to prove its ads drove performance thanks to its retail data foundation.

Mark Zuckerberg Directed Meta To Create a Prediction Markets App

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from the New York Times:
Mr. Zuckerberg, the chief executive of Meta, recently dispatched a small team at his company to create a smartphone app similar to Polymarket and Kalshi, two employees with knowledge of the matter said. Users would not wager money, and the app would probably rely on a video game-like points system instead, one person said, though the company had not ruled out the eventual use of real money betting. The app is internally referred to as “Arena” and would function independently from Meta’s social networking apps, which include Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp and Messenger, said the employees, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss confidential plans. Meta aims to grow the app by leveraging its large social networking audiences and directing them toward using it, they said.

The effort, which insiders characterized as experimental but a top priority, is part of a broader push by Mr. Zuckerberg to create new types of apps based on emerging social behavior online. More than 3.56 billion people visit one or more of Meta’s apps every day, an amount that has raised questions about whether those platforms have reached a saturation point. Arena is one of a handful of apps that Meta is trying out. Others include one called Meta Photos, another stand-alone app which would create new types of media using artificial intelligence, the employees said. […] Meta insiders have cautioned that Arena remains in development and may not be released. But as executives search for ways to keep the world’s largest social media sites thriving, Mr. Zuckerberg appears to be relying on his well-worn product development strategy: Follow the users.

Easy

By kwelch007 • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Should be able to vibe-code that with Llama in a couple hours. Totally secure, and get employee credits for using AI too!

Me too

By sinkskinkshrieks • Score: 5, Funny Thread
Because every oligarch needs an insider information exploitation meets outsider rube monetization Ponzi scheme.

Yep, they’re running out of steam

By ebunga • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

I mean, what was the business plan once everybody that could ever possibly want to be on facebook was on facebook?

Gambling

By rsilvergun • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
It’s called gambling.

Digital Euro Expected To Launch By 2029 After EU Backing

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
The European Parliament’s economic committee has backed a digital euro designed to reduce Europe’s dependence on US-controlled payment networks such as Visa and Mastercard. The ECB-backed currency is targeted for launch by 2029 after a full parliamentary vote and negotiations with EU member states. Euronews reports:
Under the proposal, consumers would be able to hold digital euros in a dedicated wallet, subject to a holding limit that has yet to be determined. The system would support both online and offline payments and is intended to offer a high degree of privacy, with the ECB unable to directly identify users from their payment data.

The ECB would provide the underlying infrastructure, while commercial banks and payment service providers would offer digital euro services to customers. Financial institutions are expected to be compensated for their participation in the scheme, while merchants will pay fees that are expected to be lower than those associated with current card transactions.

How that compensation should be structured remains one of the most contentious issues ahead of negotiations with EU member states, according to three sources familiar with the discussions. […] The European Parliament is expected to formalise the committee’s position during a plenary vote in Strasbourg in early July. Negotiations with the EU’s 27 member states would then begin, with lawmakers aiming to reach a final agreement before the end of the year.

Re:There is very little need

By bsolar • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Bank-transfers are fast, cheap, efficient in the Euro-zone. A “Digital Euro” has no real uses. My take is this is some politicians desiring to appear “modern”.

The idea is not to replace or compete with SEPA: it’s to try to replicate some nice aspects of cash in a more and more cash-less society especially for day-to-day transactions.

A cash-less payment currently needs to involve a private financial institution somewhere in the transaction. This is because the central bank only issues cash. This “digital euro” supposedly will allow for cash-less transaction only involving government institutions instead of private ones.

Of course the question is whether you trust more a government institution than a private one and whether this will open the door to an eventual phasing-out of cash down the road…

Re:There is very little need

By Errol backfiring • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
Especially banks want a cashless society. The idea of a Central Bank Digital Currency is already quite old in Europe, but the banks have sabotaged it time and time again, out of fear that they would not be necessary anymore and would be unable to squeeze themselves between every payment.

Re: There is very little need

By bsolar • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Ah, so does that work in all EU-countries? Or just in yours?

Instant SEPA support for retail payments is still fragmentary and relies on private financial institutions.

The idea with the Digital Euro is that it would effectively have “legal tender” status. The EU would definitely push for widespread adoption.

Re:CBDC, and so it begins

By nehumanuscrede • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Biggest concern will be privacy issues.

It’s bad enough that the major payment processors have any say so about what their cards
can be used to purchase and how much leverage they have in what services can be tied to
their cards. ( Think the adult entertainment and / or firearm industries )

Now, you introduce a system where the government will get a snapshot of every single
purchase you make and can easily evolve into a permissions model where your purchases
must only be those that are approved by your government in question.

( Especially in the UK where mean comments on the internet are enough to get you arrested )

On a whim, they can simply turn off your digital account and you have zero recourse to do anything
about it if cash isn’t an alternative. See how willing you are to attend a protest or demonstration when
facial recognition tags you, suspends your accounts and leaves you with nothing until you report to
the local magistrate to discuss your recent participation in the aforementioned protest.

Cash will always be king when it comes to the right to privacy.

Re:CBDC, and so it begins

By XXongo • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

As soon as cash is gone, taxes are going to be hiked because economic activity can’t escape into the grey zone so easily.

Logically the opposite: as soon as cash is gone, taxes are going to decrease because economic activity can’t avoid paying taxes by escaping into the grey zone so easily, and hence the people formerly dodging taxes will start paying their share.

Meta Launches Cheaper Smart Glasses Without Ray-Ban

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot
Meta has launched its first smart glasses without Ray-Ban branding. Starting at $299, they’re cheaper than the Ray-Ban Meta Gen 2 while retaining EssilorLuxottica as a design and manufacturing partner. The Verge reports:
As far as style and specs, the Meta Glasses aren’t that different from Ray-Bans. The internal specs are the same as the recently released Ray-Ban Meta Optics Styles, with slightly longer battery life. The Adventurer models have thinner rims, while the Fury models hew a bit closer to the Meta Ray-Ban Display with a bolder, chunkier frame. You could describe the Adventurer as square, and the Fury as even more square. The Kylie glasses sport a more unique design with a distinct Y2K flavor that I’m told is meant to be worn lower on your nose. […] While playing around with the Meta Glasses, it was hard not to notice that the camera appears smaller than in previous Ray-Ban glasses. Technically, Himel tells me, that’s not new to these Meta Glasses. It was actually introduced back in March with the prescription-optimized Optics Styles.

[…] Meta is quadrupling down on AI. The new Meta Glasses will all launch with Muse Spark, the first model out of Meta’s Superintelligence Labs. (It’ll also be arriving on older Ray-Ban and Oakley glasses in the US and Canada via a software update.) Supposedly, that means more helpful glasses. At my hands-on, I was told that Meta AI would now be less stiff. I’d be able to talk to it more naturally and get smarter responses. The AI now supports 14 more languages, including Arabic, Japanese, Mandarin, Hindi, and Korean. Pedestrian turn-by-turn navigation is also coming to Meta’s displayless glasses. Later this month, there’ll be a new “dynamic photo” feature that automatically takes multiple frames and then recommends the best one.

Never. Ever

By courteaudotbiz • Score: 3 Thread

You’d pay me to wear “smart glasses” and I wouldn’t want them.

Now get off my lawn!

How long can Meta survive…?

By ConceptJunkie • Score: 4, Funny Thread

How long can Meta survive without shipping a product people actually want?

That’s what I really want

By wakeboarder • Score: 3 Thread

a cheaper way to erode everyone’s privacy and let FB and Zuck increase their intrusion in to my life and everyone else’s. Imagine your in the age before cellphones and computers. A billionaire is commissioning a device to track everyone and everything around them and people are actually buying it, the device gives them more info about their surroundings and feeds back all information so the company can sell more ads to people and enslave humanity. The future is now.

Never Meta

By Baron_Yam • Score: 3 Thread

I’d love a nice HUD on normal-looking glasses, driven by a local connection to my phone.

Never would I ever touch anything that’s basically a camera ingesting everything for submission to Facebook.

If I could use them with Gemini or Claude, maybe

By brunes69 • Score: 3 Thread

I have zero interest in getting looped into Meta’s sub-standard AI and relying on it for stuff when the rest of my ecosystem is all wired into Gemini and Claude.

When will a glasses maker launch with OPEN SUPPORT for what AI assistant you want to use with it? Why does it need to be tied to a specific vendor?