Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Microsoft Tells Engineers ‘Tokenmaxxing Is Not What We Are Optimizing For’
  2. Trump Begins Selling $100,000 Monthly Subscription Service to Wall Street
  3. Trump Administration Drafting Ban On Chinese Data Center Devices
  4. Apple Says More Ex-Employees May Have Taken Confidential Data to OpenAI
  5. Apple Launches Legal Challenge Against UK Demand To Access Encrypted User Data
  6. Sandisk and SK Hynix Publish First Open High Bandwidth Flash Standard
  7. Russia-Linked ‘Midnight Blizzard’ Group Hijacks Hotel Wi-Fi With CaptiveCrunch
  8. Spain Offers $1.14 Billion To Get Thirty Meter Telescope Moved To Canary Islands
  9. OpenAI’s Astra Solved Decades-Old Math Problems For $2,000
  10. An AI-Supervised Remote Exam Went So Badly That 58,000 Students Must Retake It
  11. Schools Are Ditching Chromebooks For MacBooks By the Thousands
  12. Microsoft Is Bringing Xbox 360 Games to PC
  13. Microsoft CEO Touts His Own DIY AI Project To Wall Street and His 20 Million Followers
  14. Apple’s iCloud File Sharing Left Ex-Employees With Access to Secret Documents
  15. Samsung Bans Smart TV Apps That Share Users’ Internet Connections

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Microsoft Tells Engineers ‘Tokenmaxxing Is Not What We Are Optimizing For’

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Microsoft is introducing AI token budgets for employees, making the cheaper GPT-5.6 its default internal model and telling engineers to focus on business results rather than maximizing AI usage. 404 Media reports:
“As we accelerate our use of GitHub Copilot to deliver on our goals, we all need to be aware of how we consume tokens,” Jay Parikh, an executive vice president at Microsoft said in an email to Microsoft employees. GitHub is owned by Microsoft, and GitHub Copilot is an AI coding tool. “Tokenmaxxing is not what we are optimizing for. I want all of us focused on maximizing outcomes that move the needle for our customers and our business.” “As such, we are updating our internal guidance and managing token spend with the same discipline we apply to every other critical resource,” Parikh said in the email.

Parikh’s email says that in an effort to “get greater value from our token investment” Microsoft is making OpenAI GPT-5.6, which is cheaper to use than other models, the default model for internal use. His email also links to updated internal Copilot guidelines stating that, as of July 2026, Microsoft divisions will have an “AI token budget target,” and that employees can track their individual AI spending. “While there is no target spend value being shared at this time. The data shows that many engineers spend in the range of hundreds of dollars a month to a few thousand dollars in tokens,” the guidelines say. They also say that some decisions may place further restrictions as they monitor spend.

[…] Parikh’s email said Microsoft will keep learning and adjusting its AI policies as models and products evolve, and stressed that he doesn’t want to slow down the company’s progress towards becoming “AI-first.” “We are not optimizing for fewer tokens,” he said. “We are optimizing for more impact per token.

Trump Begins Selling $100,000 Monthly Subscription Service to Wall Street

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Trump Media has officially launched its $100,000-per-month data feed giving trading firms machine-readable access to Truth Social posts milliseconds before the public. According to Fortune, five Wall Street firms have already signed up for the service, which “would generate about $500,000 in monthly revenue, or $6 million annually.”

Critics argue the service could let President Trump, who owns about 41% of the company, profit from early access to market-moving presidential communications. “I’ll be blunt,” Gian Luca Clementi, an economics professor at NYU Stern School of Business, told Fortune. “This is insider trading by definition.”

“He’s going to monetize the role of the office of the president of the United States,” he said. “The undisputable fact is that somebody is going to earn some more money than before, and that’s the president of the United States.” From the report:
Trump’s media venture has struggled to build a profitable social media business despite its lofty valuation. Truth Social has reported significant operating losses since going public. According to the company’s earnings report for Q1 2026, Trump Media & Technology Group netted a roughly $405 million loss and raised less than $900,000 in sales.

Not everyone agrees the arrangement meets the legal bar for insider trading. Shannon Devine, a spokeswoman for Trump Media & Technology Group, has pushed back on the characterization, telling Quartz that Truth API “offers customers the fastest way to ingest publicly available Truth Social data” and that critics “must have invented a new theory of ‘insider trading’ based on publicly available information.”

Classic insider trading law hinges on trading on secret, material information in breach of a fiduciary duty, and Truth Social posts are, by design, meant to become public within moments — raising real doctrinal uncertainty about whether faster access alone qualifies. But other legal experts argue the greater risk lies ahead. Richard Painter, former White House chief ethics counsel, has argued that the arrangement could violate federal law once Trump posts genuinely market-moving news — on tariffs, military action, or other policy decisions — before it’s public, with Truth Social effectively acting as a paid “tipper” on the president’s behalf.
Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) said he plans to introduced legislation Tuesday to ban the president from selling expedited access to his statements.

Ok, so since market has started ignoring him

By Zarhan • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

…so because his friends can no longer make bank by shorting/buying stocks or oil futures or whatever based on soon-to-be-posted tweet on Hormuz open/closed today, the new scheme is just skip all that and directly ask for cash. Same as with the crypto.

Congress won’t act

By OrangeTide • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

So corruption and embezzlement continues.

Just imagine

By ArchieBunker • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

If Obama did this. There would have been an impeachment hearing that same day.

Insider info

By MachineShedFred • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

What’s going to be awesome is when the SEC starts shitting all over anyone actually using this service while completely ignoring the source of the insider information.

Anyone with an actual trading license that they want to keep should steer very wide of this shit.

When milliseconds count

By angryman77 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
This is material non-public information until after its available to the public…several milliseconds in the future. Definitely insider trading.

Trump Administration Drafting Ban On Chinese Data Center Devices

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Longtime Slashdot reader schwit1 shares a report from Reuters:
The Federal Communications Commission, which oversees the U.S. telecom industry, is working on the measure to bar imports of new Chinese optical transceivers, which allow data to travel over fiber-optic cables at the speed of light within data centers. Officials hope to publish it this year, when it would take effect. The move, not previously reported, aims to prevent Chinese firms from stealing data, installing malware or disrupting service at U.S. data centers, which house the chips to train and run AI models.

The FCC could still modify or shelve the restriction, the sources stressed, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive matters. […] A U.S. ban on new models of Chinese data center devices would likely hit China’s Zhongji Innolight, one of the biggest global sellers of transceivers, which was added to the Pentagon’s list of alleged Chinese military-backed companies in June. The list can be a harbinger of tougher action. A ban could also raise costs for American cloud firms such as Amazon Web Services, as it may force them to transition to other producers such as U.S.-based Coherent and Lumentum.

That is one way to stop AI DC builds

By CommunityMember • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Some of the largest buyers of Chinese manufactured transceivers are the hyperscalers. The hyperscalers represent more than half of Zhongji Innolight’s total revenue. While there may be other sources, blocking the purchase of Chinese manufactured transceivers may have a significant impact on the AI data center builds.

The power paradox

By ArchieBunker • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The FCC is powerless to regulate net neutrality yet powerful enough to ban random products over unfounded claims.

Re:That is one way to stop AI DC builds

By devnulljapan • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Some of the largest buyers of Chinese manufactured transceivers are the hyperscalers. The hyperscalers represent more than half of Zhongji Innolight’s total revenue. While there may be other sources, blocking the purchase of Chinese manufactured transceivers may have a significant impact on the AI data center builds.

So, it’s just another trump shakedown dressed up as national security then. He shakes this stick, mysteriously and completely coincidentally Anthropic and OpenAI and all the others pony up a few million in donations to his campaign or buy his crypto or gold shoes or whatever and all of a sudden the issue goes away … until the next round of bullying begins.

Stick but no carrot

By Turkinolith • Score: 3 Thread
They sure do talk about banning things, but so far I’ve seen very little done to actually get businesses to BUILD that stuff here. Seems all it will do is cut out choice and raise prices.

scare wording

By algaeman • Score: 4, Funny Thread
“is working on the measure to bar imports of new Chinese optical transceivers, which allow data to travel over fiber-optic cables at the speed of light within data centers” Oooh, scary. These are so high tech that they have been used in data centers for 30 years now. Maybe they should ban capacitors from China because these alternating plates of ceramic have the ability to cripple data centers when they fail.

Apple Says More Ex-Employees May Have Taken Confidential Data to OpenAI

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Apple is now seeking a preliminary injunction to prevent OpenAI and Jony Ive’s io startup from developing AI hardware allegedly based on stolen Apple trade secrets. “The iPhone maker also claims that more of its former employees may be involved with the trade secrets theft,” reports TechCrunch. From the report:
In a new filing, Apple is requesting expedited discovery from the accused OpenAI employees, senior systems engineer Chang Liu and Chief Hardware Officer Tang Yew Tan; OpenAI, and its foundation; and io, the device startup co-founded by Apple’s former lead designer Jony Ive. Apple also notes that its continued investigation has so far revealed 11 other former Apple employees beyond Liu and Tan may have been witnesses or otherwise involved in the case, and others who were previously named in the original complaint, like OpenAI employee Yu-Ting Peng.

The filing marks an escalation in Apple’s legal battle with OpenAI, as it suggests Apple has uncovered new evidence that the misconduct goes beyond the former employees named in the original complaint. “For example, another former Apple employee seems to have met with Mr. Liu and Ms. Peng in advance of Ms. Peng’s interview at OpenAI and discussed with them during that meeting Apple proprietary information relating to unannounced products,” the filing states. “Yet another former Apple employee took screenshots of confidential Apple documents relating to an unannounced Apple product before an interview at OpenAI.”

“And, after Apple filed its complaint, multiple former Apple employees now working at OpenAI reached out to discuss returning Apple-issued work devices they kept when they left Apple,” Apple claims, suggesting there were more who were possibly involved with the scheme. Apple is pushing the court to allow for expedited discovery because it believes it has good cause to suspect that there are others involved in the theft of its intellectual property. The company noted that its motion for a preliminary injunction is also pending.
Apple’s request for a preliminary injunction is “both based on false information and completely unnecessary because we do not have, nor want, any of their trade secrets,” said OpenAI in a blog post.

“We’re much more interested in building innovative products and technologies that push the frontier,” OpenAI’s statement reads.

Well

By drinkypoo • Score: 3 Thread

Good thing they BYOD so all that data is so easy to exfiltrate.

If I were OpenAI…

By ClickOnThis • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

…I would not want to hire thieves. They’re just as likely to steal from you as from their previous employer. Not saying OpenAI necessarily wouldn’t, just that I wouldn’t.

Let discovery take its course. If there’s any there there, we’ll find out what it is.

Apple Launches Legal Challenge Against UK Demand To Access Encrypted User Data

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Guardian:
Apple has launched a new legal challenge against a UK government demand to access its customers’ highly encrypted data, a year after the Home Office agreed to abandon its previous request. The US tech company launched the legal complaint last month at the Investigatory Powers Tribunal (IPT), an independent court that has the power to investigate claims that the UK intelligence services have acted unlawfully. The UK government had made a second request to Apple to grant it a “back door” to encrypted iCloud data belonging to British users, according to an order issued by the court.

Britain backed down on its original demand for access to data from UK and US customers last year, after a heated transatlantic tussle over encryption between London and Washington. UK authorities subsequently issued a new “technical capability notice” (TCN) to Apple that did not apply to American users. Apple is seeking to challenge the British government’s powers to issue TCNs under the UK Investigatory Powers Act, according to the details of the new legal case first reported by the Financial Times. […] The original TCN issued last year asked Apple for the right to see users’ encrypted data protected by its advanced data protection (ADP) program in the event of a national security risk.

Apple said the removal of the tool — which not even it can access — would make users more vulnerable to data breaches from bad actors and other threats to customer privacy. Creating a “back door” would also mean all data was accessible by Apple, which it could be forced to share with law enforcement possessing a warrant. As a result, Apple withdrew UK customers’ access to its ADP program in January 2025. The Home Office has maintained that the Investigatory Powers Act, under which such orders are issued, contains robust safeguards and is used only when absolutely necessary.

‘Robust Safeguards’

By mccalli • Score: 5, Informative Thread
Just for context, when its predecessor RIPA, Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act, came in it was said to be used only for cases such as terrorism etc.. Instead, it was found that councils started using to check people were putting things in the right rubbish bins for collection.

Robust safeguards indeed.

Sandisk and SK Hynix Publish First Open High Bandwidth Flash Standard

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
BrianFagioli writes:
Sandisk and SK hynix have published the first open technical specification for High Bandwidth Flash (HBF) through the Open Compute Project. HBF is designed to create a new memory tier between High Bandwidth Memory and traditional SSD storage, giving AI inference systems more near compute capacity without relying entirely on expensive HBM. The specification supports capacities up to 512GB using 8-high and 16-high NAND stacks, with bandwidth tiers ranging from about 0.4TB per second to 3.0TB per second. It also uses the UCIe chiplet interface, which could make HBF easier to integrate with CPUs, GPUs, and other accelerators. Google and Tenstorrent participated in the standardization effort, but commercial products and independent benchmarks are still missing.

An open standard… or a moat?

By memory_register • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Sandisk and SK Hynix are fleecing everybody - pc and phone makers, NVIDIA, the Mag7 - which means we are all paying a ton more for their products. They are essentially an oligopoly along with a small handful of memory makers. Did they do this out of the kindness of their hearts, or to create a standard they control to their own benefit?

Re:An open standard… or a moat?

By williamyf • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Sandisk and SK Hynix are fleecing everybody - pc and phone makers, NVIDIA, the Mag7 - which means we are all paying a ton more for their products. They are essentially an oligopoly along with a small handful of memory makers. Did they do this out of the kindness of their hearts, or to create a standard they control to their own benefit?

Same with Dell with CAMM and nVIDIA+Micron with SOCAMM (similar name, similar idea, completely different use cases). Both of those presented the original stadard as a PoC, and then handed it over to JEDEC, so they became CAMM2 and SOCAMM2, completely neutral industry wide standards.

I suspect the same will happen here, a few demo/lab/PoC products will be produced, and then this will be handed over to JEDEC, so that it becomes an industry wide standard.

What do they (SKHynix, Sandisk and before them Dell, Micron and nVIDIA) win by doing this? IF (and only if) there are patents involved, they win FRAND revenue (just as an aside, neither CAMM2 nor SOCAMM2 have patents involved). And wether there are patents involved or not, these companies have a leg up on the competition in terms of know-how and practice making the stuff.

Re:Optane

By geek • Score: 4, Informative Thread

It’s easy to blame Intel but that was a joint venture with Micron and Intel. IMFlash out of Lehi Utah. Micron was every bit as responsible and if I remember right still holds most of the patents.

You could even make the case it was Micron that killed it because they dumped the entire thing on Intel and sold off the Lehi fab. Without Micron sharing manufacturing costs and with scaling difficulties lagging behind traditional NAND bit density improvements, Optane became financially unviable.

Russia-Linked ‘Midnight Blizzard’ Group Hijacks Hotel Wi-Fi With CaptiveCrunch

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
A Russia-linked group tracked as Midnight Blizzard has compromised hotel and conference Wi-Fi portals worldwide, redirecting guests to phishing pages and fake software updates that steal credentials, session tokens, and other sensitive data. Microsoft says the campaign, dubbed CaptiveCrunch, “targets traveling employees generally rather than a particular sector,” reports iTNews. From the report:
Midnight Blizzard, tracked internally by Microsoft under its earlier codename NOBELIUM, is attributed by the US and UK governments to Russia’s SVR (Sluzhba Vneshney Razvedki) foreign intelligence service. Microsoft’s technical analysis said compromises occurred in “several countries” without naming them, and it did not give a total number of affected venues, organisations or individuals.

A related investigation published earlier in July by security firm ReliaQuest, and which Microsoft cited in its report, found compromised captive portal gateways across multiple United States cities as well as in India and Saudi Arabia, mostly at hotels. ReliaQuest said the traffic it observed came from organizations across financial services, professional services, legal, health care, energy and retail, suggesting the campaign targets traveling employees generally rather than a particular sector.

[…] Where attackers gained a foothold, Microsoft said they deployed two main tools: CornFlake, a Windows remote access trojan (RAT) written in Go capable of keylogging, screenshot and webcam capture, audio surveillance and credential and session token theft. They would also drop ChocoShell, an in-memory PowerShell infostealer targeting browser cookies, saved passwords, Microsoft 365 single sign-on (SSO) tokens and wi-fi credentials. Microsoft also said it has seen indications the attackers might be targeting Android devices with similar prompts urging victims to download and install an APK file.

DEFCON

By backslashdot • Score: 3 Thread

I’m not too worried, as hotels should have these patched within two weeks. Just thank God there’s no hacker conference this weekend in a city like Las Vegas, which has the most hotel rooms in America.

Spain Offers $1.14 Billion To Get Thirty Meter Telescope Moved To Canary Islands

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Longtime Slashdot reader schwit1 shares a report from Behind the Black:
In a new bid to get the Thirty Meter Telescope (TMT) to move from Hawaii, which has blocked its construction for more than a decade, the Spanish government has put together a $1.14 billion package that would not only pay for construction on the Canary Islands, but would finance an additional half century of operations.
Tech Times provides some additional details:
The package is conditional on the TMT International Observatory formally choosing La Palma as its construction site. The financing architecture has three pillars and two additional contingent instruments. The first pillar is 400 million euros (approximately $456 million USD) from Spain’s Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities, routed through the Centre for Technological Development and Innovation (CDTI). This figure was first pledged a year ago in July 2025 as Spain’s initial bid.

The second pillar is a 300 million-euro (approximately $342 million USD) loan from the EIB [European Investment Bank] itself — subject to satisfactory completion of the bank’s technical, financial, and legal due diligence and approval by its governing bodies.

The third is a potential 300 million-euro (approximately $342 million USD) participation from the Instituto de Credito Oficial (ICO), Spain’s state development finance institution, evaluated under equivalent conditions to the EIB loan but subject to its own separate analysis. Spain’s export credit agency, Cesce, may also provide coverage instruments, and the EIB has left open the possibility of expanding its support through intermediated financing mechanisms or guarantees.

Let them choose

By Baron_Yam • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I’m all for keeping a nice environment, but whenever someone trots out the word ‘sacred’ I want them to fuck all the way off.

You know what should be sacred? Science and discovery. Even before it had a name and was formalized, science was advancing humanity’s state. It’s the reason we’re not still wandering the savannahs and forests of the world in small groups, subject to every random whim of Nature.

It’s a bad time to invest in anything knowledge-based in the US anyway.

Re: Hawaii blocked the TMT for more than a decade

By Ol Olsoc • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I don’t understand - what better monument to the sky gods could you build than an absolutely fecking mahoosive telescope?

The “Native Hawaiians” want us the Haole out of there, the blocking of the Space Telescope is just a way of messing with those they hate.

Re: Let them choose

By swillden • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Why not let the people who were first on the land choose? Europeans decimated indigenous Americans with disease and war..

Right, the land rightfully belongs to whoever owned it second-to-last! Not to the people the second-to-last owners forcibly ejected from it, of course, and not to the people who own it now, only to the second-to-last.

</sarcasm>

I think we should have more respect than we do for the indigenous peoples, but pretending that there was no war and no forcible land grabs before the Europeans arrived is not just ahistorical but ignorant of human nature. Polynesian history, which includes the Hawaiians, is incredibly bloody. The Europeans dominated when they arrived not because they were more violent — there’s a good case to be made that they were less, though it’s a question of degrees, not kind — but because the Enlightenment gave them much better tools. And, of course, because centuries of city living had bred up a bunch of diseases, but that’s part of the same story.

Did European arms and power make it “right” that the natives were conquered? No. But it wasn’t “right” that the natives conquered each other, either. Humanity — also as a result of the Enlightenment and the long, slow development of humanism — has become more moral and less violent, and we now have more respect for other cultures and other peoples. And that’s a good thing! But it doesn’t make sense to project our own moral views back in time, and it definitely doesn’t make sense to do so selectively, demonizing the winners and lionizing the losers.

The only thing that really makes sense is to apply our improved (though still very imperfect) morality to the situation we have now, messy, complicated and conflicted as it is. It’s nice to give the native Hawaiian culture some respect, but it’s wrong to give it more respect than that of Hawaii today.

Business Interests

By Wdi • Score: 5, Informative Thread

At least some of the most vocal opponents organize, in collaboration with energy drink maker Red Bull, motocross races on the slope of the volcano, right up to the top. These will have to stop because of the dust they produce. Just maybe there are real religious objections, but certainly there is money.

Re:Business Interests

By Rei • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

I take native Hawaiian religious objections seriously. These are people who take a fatalistic “Pele will take what she wants, it’s pointless to try to stop her” attitude toward lava flows running over their houses that seems utterly insane here in Iceland. We’ll buy up every available water pump on the international market and walk on active-flowing lava fields to save a harbour for a couple thousand people. We’ll keep running tourist sites right next to a volcano that erupts every couple months by building multi-story-high berms around it with giant bulldozers and cooling anything that tries to overtop to make the berms even higher. And it totally works . But Hawaiians will sit back and watch incredibly slow-flowing flows with easy diversion paths take out everything they hold dear. At best they’ll point to some primitive failed attempts in like the 1940s as a reason to not try, but then when pressed, it often comes back to: “Pele will take what she wants to take.”

Another example: geothermal drilling on the Big Island. Massive protests. Massive resistance, way beyond the token NIMBY resistance here. Meanwhile Hawaii continues to generate most of its electricity from oil, at great cost. Hawaii is the only other place (outside of Iceland) to have accidentally drilled into a magma chamber. In Hawaii they treated it as a major incident and immediately shut down the well. When we did it? Our reaction was, “WOW, we can produce REALLY hot steam from THIS well!”, made it into a production well, and started planning to drill more.

I guess one major difference here is that in the early Icelandic cosmology, volcanoes weren’t the product of a high-ranking creator goddess, but rather, Surtr, who was practically a demon and was fated to destroy the world. It’s good to resist Surtr!

OpenAI’s Astra Solved Decades-Old Math Problems For $2,000

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Forbes:
The cost of producing new results on ten longstanding mathematical problems just fell to $2,000, according to OpenAI, which says its Astra model generated machine-checkable proofs for questions that had resisted human progress for decades. OpenAI published the work on August 1 and used it to give its next major model family a name: Astra. The results run across group theory, high-dimensional geometry, coding theory, quantum complexity, lattice cryptography and extremal combinatorics. They arrived as a 249-page manuscript collection and, alongside it, something the field has not seen attached to an AI claim before at this scale: a machine-checkable certificate for every single result.

The problems were not textbook exercises dressed up as discoveries. Each had been open for at least ten years, most of them far longer, and several sit at the center of their subfields:
- A construction establishing the existence of non-sofic groups, a question that has occupied group theorists for years.
- A disproof of Connes’s rigidity conjecture, a long-standing problem in the theory of von Neumann algebras.
- An improvement to the general upper bound on sphere-packing density in high dimensions, a bound that had stood since 1978.
- Three problems come from the catalogue of open questions left behind by Paul Erdos.
The announcement follows another result from May, when OpenAI used a similar reasoning model to produce an original mathematical proof disproving a famous unsolved conjecture in geometry, which was first posed by Paul Erdos in 1946.

“Amazing but oversold”

By Goldenhawk • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

If you’re going to repost the entire lede of the story, at least also share the counterpoint: “Gary Marcus, a reliable critic of the field, called the release amazing but vastly oversold. Some specialists expect that once the dust settles, a few of the ten will look genuinely surprising and the rest will be classified as reachable problems that nobody had gotten around to attacking.”

And ironically, or maybe unironically, this story reads like it was AI-generated. Phrases like these:

“Three objections are worth taking seriously, and the honest reading concedes all three.”

“Grant every objection and the structural point survives intact. Whether the ten were cherry-picked or not, the certificates still verify. A curated result that mechanically checks is a different object from a curated result that does not.”

“The cost of producing a hard answer just fell to almost nothing, and the constraint moved to proving the answer is right.”

Most humans don’t write quite like that.

Re: Hold on to your papers…

By T34L • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
This is how it works. There’s more or less uncountable amount of “unsolved problems” in maths, but it’s like; okay, so now we have higher upper bound on packing higher dimensional spheres. If a person dedicated a few months of research to that, I’d applaud it as an example of human ingenuity and endurance. But, it’s nor a problem anyone needed to solve. It wasn’t something keeping anyone up at night. The practical applications of packing spheres in higher dimensions are… esoteric at the most generous. The LLM’s are sweeping up obscure problems that were unsolved because nobody would get a grant to work on them. And you can argue $2000 was cheap, but like, if you could spend $2000 to exactly count the amount of sand grains in a sand mine, it’d be impressive that it’s done and we know for sure now, but also, really not worth the $2000, and not exactly meaningful work anyone was waiting for. I think the relevant question to ask is; if the LLM’s are so damn smart, why haven’t they yet figured out optimizations that’d allow the companies making them actually make money? Why’re they worried with everyone else’s math problems, but somehow the companies making them continue being the least profitable, most expensive ventures in history?

Re: Hold on to your papers…

By backslashdot • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

You’d think there’ll be people solving the easy unsolved problems, but the fact is humans go for glamor. I’ll give you a specific example, in my company .. which does biotech .. I mention in passing to every intern the following: “there are about 20,000 genes in the human genome. For many of them, nobody has investigated what it does. You can find numerous lists on this (reference: https://unknome.mrc-lmb.cam.ac… ) .. for example a famous gene like TP53 (which causes cancer when fucked) has tens of thousands of publications made about it (though ironically there’s likely still stuff it does that we don’t know). Meanwhile as shown in the reference URL there are hundreds of genes that have had no papers published on them. Like zero, no publications .. given the resources available at this company we will let you investigate what those genes do and possibly find out something cool, but, you have to do it on your own time."

Guess how many interns have bothered to do that in the past decade? Zero.

Not an LLM

By phantomfive • Score: 5, Informative Thread
AI math proofs have been a thing for nearly half a century. There has been a LOT of work on it.

The work openAI is doing isn’t just saying, “ChatGPT, solve this problem.” They have combined their LLM (probably a custom LLM, with a math focus) with existing algorithms, and expert mathematicians working the prompt.

So this appears to be an incremental advance, but it’s not that an LLM automatically understands math and can start proving things.

Re: Hold on to your papers…

By Weirsbaski • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Meanwhile as shown in the reference URL there are hundreds of genes that have had no papers published on them. Like zero, no publications .. given the resources available at this company we will let you investigate what those genes do and possibly find out something cool, but, you have to do it on your own time.”

Guess how many interns have bothered to do that in the past decade? Zero.

I can think of a couple reasons nobody’s taken your company up on that.

- they’re interns (ie- short term). I worked tech full-time (and did some good stuff there), but the ramp-up on the company’s project and in-house processes took serious time - it was a full year before I could find my butt with both hands, so to speak

- and this research would be on their own time but with company resources. Meaning, discoveries would be owned by the company, and (depending on the company) the intern might not even get credit, or even paid for time spent finding them

An AI-Supervised Remote Exam Went So Badly That 58,000 Students Must Retake It

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica:
Earlier this summer, nearly 160,000 applicants took the entrance exam for UNAM, Mexico’s largest university. For the first time, they did it completely remotely, using a “lockdown” browser and AI-powered webcam proctoring software, over several weeks from late May through early June. It was a disaster. When exam results came in, they bore little resemblance to past results, especially at the top. Between 2021 and 2025, 3.5 percent of test takers scored 100 or more on the 120-question UNAM test. This year, 16.3 percent did so. The story was even worse at the highest of the high end. Between 2021 and 2025, 0.9 percent of test takers scored 110 or more; this year, 5.5 percent did so.

The surge in top scores led to accusations of widespread cheating, and UNAM appointed a commission of experts to investigate the situation. The group was given the unwieldy name “la Comision Tecnica de Personas Expertas para la Revision del Proceso de Seleccion de Ingreso a Licenciatura para el Circlo Escolar 2026-2027/1,” and it has just submitted its recommendations. The commission believes that the best path forward, given all the concerns, is to administer a “control exam” — that is, applicants will have to sit for another test, and they will do so in person.

This control exam will apply not only to those who secured a spot at UNAM based on this year’s test but also to everyone who would have been admitted based on minimum successful scores in their program of study since 2021. About 58,000 people could be affected, and places at UNAM will now depend on the results of the new test. (Details on the control exam should appear soon; classes are currently scheduled to begin on August 10, so everything will have to move quickly unless the school decides to delay classes.) According to Gaceta UNAM, the school’s official news publication, the university rector has apologized to honest applicants, since they will now have to prepare for and take the test again despite doing nothing wrong. Still, the control exam is “necessary to give certainty and guarantee equity in access,” the rector added.

If you’ve been falsely accused of cheating

By Valgrus Thunderaxe • Score: 3 Thread
on this exam, get an attorney (fast) and go after the school. 58,000 cheaters isn’t something believable.

Re:If you’ve been falsely accused of cheating

By thecombatwombat • Score: 4, Informative Thread

They didn’t say 58,000 people are accused of cheating.

They said enough people cheated that the results of the first test are just useless, so anyone who still wants a shot at getting in (about 58,000 people) will have to retake the test.

“According to Gaceta UNAM, the school’s official news publication, the university rector has apologized to honest applicants, since they will now have to prepare for and take the test again despite doing nothing wrong. Still, the control exam is “necessary to give certainty and guarantee equity in access,” the rector added.”

It’s in the freaking summary, this isn’t even a RTFA.

Hahahaha, “locked down browser”, hahahaha!

By gweihir • Score: 3 Thread

I had some discussion about the “locked down exam browser” in the software used here with my IT Security students. Apparently it is a complete joke and you can just set some OS variables and then run it in a window or a VM without any problem or any detection by it.

India exam leak

By dsgrntlxmply • Score: 4, Informative Thread
India recently had a leak of the NEET exam, and invalidated the results. There have been suicides as a consequence: NEET exam leak (BBC)

Schools Are Ditching Chromebooks For MacBooks By the Thousands

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Apple says its lower-cost MacBook Neo is beginning to displace Windows laptops and Chromebooks in K-12 schools, with several districts purchasing thousands of units. According to the company’s latest earnings call, nearly half of the large MacBook Neo purchases made by U.S. educational institutions last quarter reportedly replaced competing platforms. 9to5Mac reports:
Apple’s commentary highlighted some large district deployments moving to Neo Pinellas County Schools, one of the largest districts in Florida, which is moving its 25k students off Windows and onto MacBook Neo across its 18 high schools. In Washington, Peninsula School District 401 moved over its 8,000 students from Chromebooks to MacBook Neo. Midwest City-Del City School District in Oklahoma purchased more than 6,000 MacBook Neos to become an all-Apple district for students.

Until they run out of defective processors

By jfdavis668 • Score: 5, Informative Thread
Apple made these to use up the backlog of slightly defective processors.

Re: You say that like it’s a bad thing

By ThurstonMoore • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

My iPhone 7+ that got 8 years of updates wants to know what the fuck you are talking about.

Apple got lucky on the timing

By Pollux • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Apple released the Neo at just the right time, at the right price, right when the market was stressed and looking for answers.

I’ve been ordering Chromebooks for my district for eleven years. Prices hit an all-time low of $227 per unit back in summer 2021. Since then, prices trended up for me year after year. Last year’s units were $297. This year’s were quoted to me in April at $430 each. I was able to find new-in-box 2025 models for $330 each and went with those instead. I was also warned that, if I ordered Chromebooks, it might take months before they would arrive. I have a neighboring school district that placed an order, then had it cancelled two months later because Dell couldn’t fulfill the order. (There are supplies of Dell Chromebooks to be found, but at the moment, Dell is prioritizing supplying its biggest vendors like CDW. Meanwhile, many districts in my area typically order through smaller in-state vendors who aren’t getting the same priority from Dell.)

The market is stressed this summer; supplies are low and difficult to find. Supplies that are available are 50% - 80% higher in price than last year. Apple comes along and says “You can buy an educational laptop right now for $500”, and hell yea, the fish are gonna bite. It has nothing to do with people suddenly falling in love with Apple, and everything to do with constrains in the marketplace.

And I have no love for Apple either. Don’t forget that schools have been begging Apple for a decade to release a $500 student laptop, and all Apple did was thumb their noses at us every single year. Why did they decide they now they need to release a $500 student laptop? It’s only because they’ve been losing business to Chromebooks for a decade.

Re: You say that like it’s a bad thing

By DogFoodBuss • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Weak. My iPhone 5s from 2013 just got the iOS 12.5.8 update earlier this year. 13 years of support and counting…

Re: You say that like it’s a bad thing

By LazLong • Score: 5, Informative Thread

I bet you don’t have any school-age kids.

The school systems I’m familiar with assign notebooks to kids, and they carry them forward through future grades until they’re obsolete.

Microsoft Is Bringing Xbox 360 Games to PC

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Microsoft reportedly plans to let developers bring Xbox 360 games to PC and next-generation Xbox devices, with a gradual rollout expected between 2027 and 2028. A separate disc-to-digital program would also give players transferable digital licenses tied to their physical Xbox discs, preserving the ability to resell or trade them. The Verge reports:
With 360 games, developers can opt into making them backward compatible, and they will have control over things like a game’s price and if it’s available on Game Pass. The feature is expected to have a “gradual” rollout between 2027 and 2028 “across next-gen devices.” The “full launch” of original Xbox games on PC is also set for October 2026; the initial program announced in July included just four games.

The document also includes details about a way for players to get a digital version of a game that they already own on a physical disc, which The Verge’s Tom Warren reported on in July. The document says that if a player puts an Xbox One or Series game on disc into an Xbox One or Series X console with a disc drive, they’ll be granted a digital license that’s bound to “that disc and the player’s account.” The license will stay with a player across Xbox devices, but if the disc “changes hands,” the license will transfer to the new person. That should mean that gamers can still trade and sell discs; once the original owner of a disc does so, they can’t play the digital version they got from that disc anymore.

According to the document, a public beta for the disc-to-digital program was set for July with general availability set for August. We understand Microsoft had originally planned to test its disc-to-digital program with Xbox Insiders in July, but the beta was delayed. It’s unclear if the timeline of August general availability is still accurate.

hate to say it

By Lobachevsky • Score: 3 Thread

I hate to say it, but Microsoft has a reasonable approach with their planned disc-to-digital system. All the benefits of physical discs: visiting a friend’s house with the disc, selling the disc, plus all the benefits of a digital license: can run on a handled and other diskless systems. The idea that “the last account where the disc was used” would be the licensed owner gives a lot of flexibility, and the 2 biggest are going to a friend’s house or traveling with a handheld.

Of course, the devil’s in the fine print. Let’s see how their revocation system works for games using a 7-year music license. Steam has a good policy that if you own the game, they won’t revoke it due to license lapses; but Steam also sucks in that you can’t just take a disc to a friend’s house — they have to log into your steam account (which isn’t the end of the world). But Steam won’t sell the game once its licenses to content expire. And *many* games these days are cutting costs by licensing music for only a few years instead of in perpetuity. I don’t know, yet, how Microsoft will deal with that. If they revoke your game once it’s infringing on IP due to a lapsed music license, then it’s crap.

Get your Dupe on

By Vomitgod • Score: 4 Thread
Microsoft - can you help /. with dupe detection. https://games.slashdot.org/sto…

Microsoft CEO Touts His Own DIY AI Project To Wall Street and His 20 Million Followers

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
theodp writes:
During Microsoft’s 2026Q4 earnings call, CEO Microsoft Satya Nadella took time to tout a dashboard he personally created using AI from a Morgan Stanley analyst’s PDF research report, which suggested a rosy payback for the so-called MAG7’s (‘Magnificent 7’ companies) massive capital expenditures on AI (to which Nadella later added a “not financial advice” disclaimer). “It would be fun for you, Adam. I think one of your colleagues put out an ROIC [Return on Invested Capital] document. I took that document to Copilot, which is a PDF, and I said, ‘Build me a new Power BI dashboard, essentially.’ But here is the thing. It built a rich semantic model that went into my Fabric with OneLake that brought all the data in from the external sources. In fact, it was current with all the SEC filings of all the MAG7. And then on top of that, the repo itself is in GitHub, but the artifact is sitting in my Copilot as a site. That, to me, is a classic example of an enterprise-wide workflow. I, as a knowledge worker, could go create a dashboard. The data engineer can go to Fabric and find the artifact. The professional developer can go to the repo and find it in GitHub. And by the way, it’s all registered with Agent 365. That’s a little bit of what Amy is describing as the coming together of a new way to work, even while at the same time, bringing IT, security and manageability of it.”

After Nadella’s show-and-tell drew an underwhelming response during the call (“That’s very helpful. Thank you.” said the Morgan Stanley analyst whose team’s work Nadella scraped with AI), Nadella turned to social media with posts on LinkedIn (12M followers) and Twitter/X (8M followers) to make the case for why his DIY project was such a brilliant demonstration of how AI enables governance, controls, security, development, testing, deployment, maintenance, data analysis/modeling, visualization, usability, and value. “Some more detail on the ROIC Intelligence App I built yesterday and mentioned on today’s earnings call,” Nadella wrote on LinkedIn. “I took the PDF that Brian Nowak at Morgan Stanley put together for Hyperscale ROIC this week and used Copilot code (coming in our new superapp) with a single prompt + skill (/drill-me) to create the plan, then used autopilot in auto to create the full app (with history, lookups, scenarios, what-ifs, etc). And /rubber-duck to test. And the best part is that all the artifacts are in my enterprise environment. My app is in Copilot, my code is in GitHub Enterprise; all my data pipelines/lake/semantic models are in Fabric. And everything is under Agent 365 IT/Sec/FinOps control! So this is not about Tokenmaxxing or vibe coding. Every step of the way the rails are engineered to create value, making everything a long-term reusable asset, with governance/security, and cost controls. This is the full system to drive business value. Disclosures: This is all pulled from public sources, and for illustrative purposes only…not financial advice! :) Here is the app and architecture…”

Not unexpectedly, the accompanying screenshot of a splash page for the BI app and a buzzword-laden complicated architecture diagram drew universal praise from LinkedIn fans, but also a few barbs from less-than-impressed commenters on Nadella’s Twitter/X post, some of whom suggested Nadella’s project might even represent a jump-the-shark moment for AI mania. “That he doesn’t see whats wrong with saying ‘My app is in Copilot, my code is in GitHub Enterprise; all my data pipelines/lake/semantic models are in Fabric’ is exactly why MS is failing at AI,’" replied @PassingPixels on X/Twitter. “Dude is having to run 5 different systems to emulate babies first vibe code.” @zigmund_ignatov added, “Why do we call glorified slide show an app?” @Mathupiriyan quipped, “Looks like Copilot just turned a PDF into a profit crystal ball.” Unimpressed, @Markusndnb remarked, “So you created a web page using tons of proprietary MS tools.” And @FishyAccounting called on Nadella to show-his-work, saying “Post the prompt or it didn’t happen.” (btw, Microsoft President Brad Smith similarly declined to provide the prompt for his own self-described amazing AI DIY reporting project that he touted at Microsoft’s Shareholder Meeting last December).

So, does Nadella’s self-promoted AI reworking of someone else’s PDF research report strike you as an amazing example of everything that’s good about AI, or does it conjure up memories of The Emperor’s New Clothes?

Presenting!

By oldgraybeard • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
The illusion of value.

Very convincing…

By gweihir • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Or rather deeply revealing where their utterly stupid AI strategy comes from. Making good software is and remains an expert game. Amateurs (like this one) need not apply. Yes, I know he has a CS degree. MS products do not reflect that and neither does this meaningless stunt.

De Clothes Of Emperor Is None He Is Having

By SlashbotAgent • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Satya’s been sniffing his own farts for a little too long. He created a Rube Goldberg machine that presents a near useless dashboard.

Care to tell us exactly what the investor value of that dashboard is, Satya? Let me save you from having to prompt AI. The value of that dashboard is negative at least triple digits. Negative!

This is the Path to CEO AI Psychosis

By careysub • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Nadella is not showing psychosis here, but the fact that he thinks his chatbot hack of a webpage is evidence of something important show him on the road to get there.

CEOs “play with AI,” develop a prototype, or generate a contract, to use Levie’s examples, and then make the leap to believing agents can do the work.

But these top-level executives aren’t the people who have to review code, discover bugs, and identify calls to hallucinated libraries before software is deployed. They aren’t responsible for training AI models on a company’s idiosyncratic contract terms, nor do they have to spend days combing through contracts to find sneaky terms, as Levie indicates.

In other words, Levie’s theory posits, CEOs don’t really understand processes well enough to know what really can and can’t be automated. But that lack of knowledge doesn’t stop them from acting on their beliefs.

Holy Cow!

By ThurstonMoore • Score: 4 Thread

Reading that first paragraph was awful.

Apple’s iCloud File Sharing Left Ex-Employees With Access to Secret Documents

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Apple’s practice of mixing employees’ work files with personal iCloud accounts reportedly left some former staff with continued access to confidential documents, messages, and even new updates after leaving the company. “The former employees said many Apple files they had been shared on over their careers at the company — including planning documents for product launch events — continued to sync to their personal devices through the iCloud storage service after they left Apple,” reports The Information. “In some cases, they even received notifications about fresh updates to the documents. Some former employees said they were petrified to delete the files for fear that doing so would attract Apple’s attention.” MacRumors reports:
Apple files get mixed in with employees’ accounts because the company encourages them to use their personal Apple Accounts with their work iCloud account. Employees are given a 2TB iCloud plan and are able to merge the storage with their existing Apple Account or create a new account. Since only one primary account can be signed in at a time, most opt to use their existing account to avoid having to carry two iPhones. Apple has a managed folder for workplace files that it revokes access to when an employee leaves, but some internal documents aren’t saved there automatically and shared files end up mixed in with personal content. Employees can also retain access to iMessage chats and files shared via the Messages app.

Lingering access to Apple systems is central to Apple’s lawsuit against OpenAI. In its filing, Apple alleged that former employee Chang Liu breached Apple’s systems using a “rare, previously unknown authentication bug” to download files while he was working at OpenAI. Apple told The Information that the OpenAI lawsuit is unrelated to any files left available on iCloud and that it does not pursue legal claims against former employees who accidentally have Apple documents in their personal iCloud accounts. “This case is about OpenAI employees wrongfully taking Apple’s secret and confidential information regarding our unreleased technologies, processes, and products. Nothing in the filing relates to documents shared by, or stored in, iCloud.”

Defective by design

By dgatwood • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The root cause comes from these twelve words:

Since only one primary account can be signed in at a time …

Authentication systems that allow only a single signed-in account are defective by design. Approximately 100% of all people have more than one account that they need to be signed in with.

I have half a dozen Google accounts for specific purposes — one for work, one for personal, one for electronic music tablets to which multiple people share physical access, a couple of old domain-specific accounts that got converted from free work profiles, and I’m probably forgetting some. Not all of these are useful, but if I could not have continuous access to work and personal, it would be a tremendous pain in the backside.

And encouraging people to merge profiles like that is nuts. It all but guarantees leaks. A confidentiality agreement typically protects things you learned in the scope of your employment, but after you are employed, if they continue to send you confidential information, there’s a decent chance that you aren’t under any legal obligation to keep that secret.

This is just a really bad way to do things, driven by a fundamental flaw in their architecture. And it doesn’t just cause problems for Apple. It causes problems for their customers as well. I can’t have a separate iCloud account for my work. I have to use a Google account. And more than that, when I hit the maximum number of AirTag devices (which I’m about to reach), I can’t add additional iCloud accounts. I’m hard-capped at a single account.

While we’re at it, the limitation of a single user per iPad stems from the same defective design process. All of those sorts of 1:1 mapping decisions between accounts, users, and devices need to be fundamentally rethought, because they were always a mistake. Maybe now that Apple is being bitten by it, they’ll finally do the things that users have been asking them to do for the last decade. Bonus points if they lose their lawsuit because of a lack of a modicum of care on their part, because that just might be enough to wake the sleeping giant and get them to fix this mess.

Samsung Bans Smart TV Apps That Share Users’ Internet Connections

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot
An anonymous reader quotes a report from TechCrunch:
Several popular Samsung smart TV apps contain code that share the owner’s internet connection with strangers, potentially putting millions of Samsung smart TVs at risk of hijacking, according to new security research published on Monday. Some of these apps claim to have been installed on hundreds of millions of smart TVs in people’s homes, per the app developers. At least one of the smart TV apps was a simple Pac-Man game that Samsung had endorsed and prominently featured in its “Editor’s Choice” section on customers’ TV screens. These apps contain software that funnels outsiders’ web traffic through ordinary home and office internet connections, known as residential proxy networks (or “resproxies”), which are increasingly being linked to cybercrime. When opened, apps with resproxy code can turn the smart TV into an always-on tunnel for outsiders to funnel their web traffic through, known as an exit node — even when the app is no longer open.

The security research by Norwegian cybersecurity company Mnemonic describes a perfect storm of problems that allows low-quality apps to proliferate across Samsung’s app store, containing code that puts users at risk of having their internet connections tapped by a rogue app. Many of these apps are bare-bone shells, made from only a few lines of code, and are designed solely to load content from another website, such as a game. While such smart TV apps load content from another server, any review of these apps sees only the few lines of code within, and not necessarily the content itself. “What was reviewed is not necessarily what is running,” wrote Harrison Sand, an offensive security consultant at Mnemonic.

After TechCrunch contacted Samsung with a request for comment about the research, the electronics giant said in an emailed statement that it was banning apps that share their users’ internet connections, and will remove apps that contain the functionality. “We have already restricted new app registrations that incorporate such proxy functionalities on our Smart TV platform,” said a Samsung spokesperson. “We are currently implementing strict platform-wide developer policies explicitly banning residential proxy SDKs, and we are working to identify and remove all apps currently available in our store that contain these components.”
LG also recently announced plans to suspend apps containing ResProxy software after a security firm found that roughly 42% of apps in its TV app store allowed unknown third parties to route internet traffic through users’ televisions without their knowledge.

So embedded TV apps are getting routable IPs?

By drnb • Score: 3 Thread
I can see why Amazon, Netflix, Disney, etc thought that their embedded TV app needed a routable IP address. However I am having problems seeing how anyone else thought so. And as we move into the more obscure embedded TV apps more so.

Let embedded apps get a DHCP based non-routable IPs from the cable box. Apple TV, Amazon Fire TV, etc.

wait for it

By thegreatemu • Score: 3 Thread
Oh boy, another opportunity for 90% of the people on here to post about how they only use dumb screens and anyone who actually uses a smart TV deserves whatever they get!

Re:wait for it

By rsilvergun • Score: 4, Funny Thread
This is exactly why I keep my television tuned 24/7 to Fox News Network. There is absolutely nothing you can do to make a TV dumber than that!

Botnet

By Hentes • Score: 3 Thread

So turning your TV into a part of a botnet is now “increasingly being linked to cybercrime”. No shit.