Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Auto Companies Call For Ban On Chinese-Made Cars
  2. Genetically Modified Pig Kidney Keeps Man Alive For Record Nine Months
  3. Tesla Launches Steering-Wheel-Free Cybercab Robotaxi In Austin
  4. Bernie Sanders Proposes Artificial Superintelligence Ban Amid Rogue AI Hackings
  5. Four Major AI Models Suffer Rare Overlapping Downtime
  6. Apple Sued For $2.7 Billion Over App Tracking Transparency Rules
  7. Xbox Cloud Gaming Switches to Monthly Hour Limits
  8. ‘Welcome to the AGI Era,’ OpenAI Says As GPT-6 Astra Debuts
  9. Nvidia Launches Free Tool That Links Idle Computers Into a Personal AI Data Center
  10. OpenAI’s New Reasoning Technique Alarms AI Safety Experts
  11. Audacity 4 Rebuilds the Open Source Audio Editor But Leaves Some Features Behind
  12. Google Releases Gemini 3.8 Flash, Its Third Flash Model In Six Weeks
  13. Google Engineer Accused of Polymarket Insider Trading Says He Was Just Gambling
  14. Perplexity Will Open Source Its Faster Lily AI Engine For Apple Silicon
  15. Instrument Clusters Are Now Paid Extras In Two Hyundai Models

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Auto Companies Call For Ban On Chinese-Made Cars

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Hill:
A group representing American automakers sent a letter (PDF) Thursday to congressional leaders asking for a “permanent ban” on Chinese-made cars in the U.S. John Bozzella, the Alliance for Automotive Innovation’s CEO and president, described in the letter China’s manufacturing industry as “rooted in a well-documented pattern of unfair trade, subsidies, intellectual property theft and surveillance.” Bozzella addressed his request to Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.), Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) — urging them to back a “permanent ban on the sale, import and manufacture of Chinese connected vehicles,” before the 119th Congress concludes in January.

“Right now, Chinese automakers are dumping subsidized vehicles with connected software and hardware around the world,” Bozzella wrote, adding that China “is capturing market share” in Europe, Australia, Southeast Asia, Mexico and South America. “This hasn’t happened inside the U.S. yet, but given the scale and urgency of this threat, we urge you to enact a Chinese vehicle, software and hardware ban before adjourning this year and make this policy the law of the land,” he added. The Alliance for Automotive Innovation, a trade organization representing car manufacturers, represents the “entire” U.S. auto industry, per its website.
Bipartisan bills in the Senate and House would bar automakers with more than 15% Chinese ownership from selling vehicles in the U.S. “Enacting a permanent ban on Chinese vehicles and high-risk hardware and software in the 119th Congress will send a clear and bipartisan message that China’s strategy to dominate global automotive manufacturing will be met with a national security policy response from the American government,” wrote Bozzella.

Further reading: US Car Buyers Envy What They Cannot Have

Re:Can’t compete

By Ickyban • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

BYD has their entire supply chain integrated and locked in. The simple difference is BYD is aiming for efficiency and US companies only exist to maximize profits.

*short term profits. It’s the ongoing downfall of capitalism and public stocks.

Little by little

By MpVpRb • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

US politicians are restricting our access to the best tech in the world.
At the same time, they are cutting research funding and penalizing colleges for their political opinions.
Far too many people are anti-vax, anti-AI and anti science.
The future looks bleak.

How the US can compete again

By oumuamua • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
China did not jump into Capitalism, it set up testing areas called Special Economic Zones like Shenzhen. The US could also set up some zones free from federal /state laws just to see what happens:
1) Republican zone - let the Republicans go wild in this zone just require that Fox news broadcasters live in this zone.
2) Democrat zone - let the Democrats have free reign here.
3) Bernie Sanders zone - follows everything Bernie says.
4) Libertarian zone - full libertarian ideology.
5) Tech Bro zone - tech bros in control here, maybe restrict them to an island like part of Puerto Rico.
6) Free Trade zone - no tariffs or restrictions on trade period, including trade with Cuba, NK, Iran, Russia.

Re:Yes! Make cars expensive again!

By wonkavader • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

There’s a video on YouTube showing how they make the Bolt: https://www.youtube.com/watch?…
Compared to any modern EV factory, it looks like a grandmother knitting caps to sell on Etsy. They know how to do it, but they’d need to invest in machines, and that would hurt their short-term profits. So that’s not going to happen.

EVs are EASY TO MAKE. You can make them with way less labor, way less parts, faster build time, less rework, etc. We could be cranking them out, and building them cheap. But US companies are keeping their sunk investment in ICE vehicles going for as long as they can. Toyota has been doing the same thing.

(Quick story — Dyson looked into making an EV. They decided not to. Not because it was too hard, but because it was too easy — they figured there’d be so many being made for so cheap they wouldn’t make the kind of margins they want.)

We should be allowing the Chinese vehicles in with a medium-high tariff, with a schedule to lower the tariff on a well-known, unchangeable schedule. This would force the US to compete while at the same time allowing the US companies to plan. Instead we are providing chaos which robs them of the money they need to modernize, while at the same time making the easiest way to maximize profits the exploitation of that chaos. This is the opposite of good economics, and screws the consumer more than anyone else.

Re: Different worlds

By HiThere • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The problem is “Why should a Canadian, or European, or anyone (outside the US?) assume the US vehicles don’t come with spyware and a kill switch?”.

Yeah, it’s fair to worry about China, but they’re not special in this area.

Genetically Modified Pig Kidney Keeps Man Alive For Record Nine Months

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
A genetically modified pig kidney kept a 66-year-old man off dialysis for a record nine months, marking the longest survival yet for a pig kidney transplanted into a living person and the first time such an organ successfully served as a bridge to a later human transplant. The Guardian reports:
Tim Andrews was seriously ill with end-stage kidney disease caused by type 2 diabetes and had only a 9% chance of receiving a human kidney within five years, against a more than 40% risk of dying or being removed from the waiting list. Kidney transplantation provides the best survival and quality of life for patients with end-stage kidney disease, but global demand for human organs far exceeds supply.

Surgeons in the US successfully transplanted a kidney from Wilma, a Yucatan miniature pig, into Andrews, after genetically engineering it to be compatible with his immune system. The kidney kept Andrews free of dialysis for a record nine months, the longest period ever recorded, before it began failing and he received one from a dead human donor. It was also the first time a pig’s kidney had been used as a temporary “bridge” to a human transplant.
The breakthrough has been detailed in the journal Lancet.

Now he has an aversion to bacon

By ip_freely_2000 • Score: 3 Thread
Good for that guy and his doctors, though. Now they can squeal a good story.

Tesla Launches Steering-Wheel-Free Cybercab Robotaxi In Austin

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Tesla has begun offering public rides in Austin in its purpose-built Cybercab, a two-seat robotaxi with no steering wheel or pedals. “You can go outside, take rides,” said Ashok Elluswamy, Tesla’s VP of AI. “Anyone can take rides. It’s open to the entire public.” Previously, the fleet consisted only of Model Ys.

Texas records show Tesla had registered 45 Cybercabs as of Thursday, though the company has not disclosed how many are currently carrying passengers. Tesla also says it eventually wants consumers to be able to buy the vehicles for under $30,000. Business Insider reports:
Videos posted online by Tesla influencers and content creators who were invited to the Austin event showed that the Cybercab can be hailed through the Robotaxi app. In a video posted by David Moss, an autonomous-vehicle content creator, Robotaxi users could open the car’s butterfly doors through the app. After the riders enter the car, the doors closed automatically, Moss said in the video. The launch comes nearly two years after Tesla first unveiled the Cybercab at its “We, Robot” event in Burbank, California.

Let me think

By NotEmmanuelGoldstein • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Buy a car where there are no mechanical linkages from the ‘passenger’ to vehicle control systems: Everything is a touch-screen element totally at the mercy of a corporation. What could go wrong?

Re:45 Cybercabs as of Thursday

By T34L • Score: 5, Funny Thread
I don’t see why’d it make sense to make many cybercabs because by 2016 all Tesla cars will be self driving and you’ll be able to just send your own Tesla to run cab overnight and just make you money passively.

Re: Will these be cheaper?

By Morromist • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

In 1924 the average earnings were $1,303
And the price of a model T (the most popular car model sold that year) was $290.

Today the average salary is 70k
the price of a new Ford F-150 (the most popular car model sold last year) is from 40k - 115k

So no cars are not cheaper as you seem to suggest. Obviously they’re better, but I don’t think that was the discussion.

To me the older generation is the spoiled generation. They’ve lived through one of the wealthiest eras in human history in the wealthiest country and their miserable, constantly complaining and demanding more and electing people who have been massively increasing the national deficit - which the old people will not have to pay off becaue they’ll be dead.

Re: Let me think

By drinkypoo • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

You do realize that nowadays in modern cars practically everything is drive-by-wire, chip and software, right?

There are almost zero exceptions to the only thing being solely drive-by-wire being the throttle. Literally the only production vehicle without steering linkage is the Cybercuck. Every other one uses a linkage with a normally locked electric clutch which is disengaged during normal operation but which fails closed so that you can still steer. Every single vehicle with brake by wire uses mechanical brakes with a spring and pedal sensor before the mechanical part to do the electronic braking. So no, that is patently false and if you think it’s true then you don’t understand vehicles, the argument, or both.

Re: Let me think

By thegarbz • Score: 5, Informative Thread

You do realize that nowadays in modern cars practically everything is drive-by-wire, chip and software, right?

Actually there’s only 4 cars ever put in production with drive by wire steering. Cybertruck, the top trim of Mercedes EQS, Lexus RZ, and the Infinity Q50 (this one has a clutch override).

Every car on the road not one of these has a direct mechanical connection between the wheel and the road. It includes power steering assist, and in cars which self drive the computer can apply force to the wheel, notable not a single one of those 4 cars can apply enough torque on the wheel to overpower even a small woman yanking on the steering wheel.

The same kind of system applies to the brakes. You have a mechanical connection between breaks and wheels. ABS can apply a secondary force reduction that is limited in duration. But it’s not braking by wire. The computer can also apply a separate breaking action not linked to the brake pedal.

The only truly drive by wire system you have is the accelerator, and that’s been true since the days of fuel injection.

Bernie Sanders Proposes Artificial Superintelligence Ban Amid Rogue AI Hackings

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Hill:
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Rep. Greg Casar (D-Texas) are calling for a permanent ban on the development and deployment of artificial superintelligence, citing a series of recent hackings involving "rogue" models. The bicameral duo announced Thursday they will introduce the Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act, which would institute the permanent ban, along with temporarily pausing “advanced AI development” until federal regulators establish safety standards. The bill would also direct the U.S. to “pursue international agreements to prevent superintelligence from being developed anywhere in the world” and establish a new Cabinet-level federal agency focused on AI safety rules.

Superintelligence refers to AI technologies that will surpass the smartest humans. Several technology leaders, including OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, have suggested superintelligence is on the horizon. The legislation would also set new penalties for any person or company trying to circumvent the ban, including the corporate death penalty, in which a court forces a company to shut down. Individual developers could also face up to 20 years in prison, the lawmakers said.
“Nearly every day, there is a frightening new story about how Big Tech companies are losing control of the technology they are developing, with potentially cataclysmic results,” Sanders wrote in a press release.
“The leaders of the major AI companies publicly acknowledge that they do not fully understand the technology and that it is escaping their control. It is irresponsible for society to allow them to move forward and make these products even more advanced.”

Casar emphasized AI’s fast development, writing in a statement, “In just four years, we have gone from the first version of ChatGPT to AI models so powerful they cannot be properly controlled.”

Barn Door

By WolphFang • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Every critter in the barn has already run out into the barnyard. Closing the barn door to keep them in the barn will not work. It’s too late. Do we honestly think we really *know* about all the frontier models? Think China, Japan, South Korea, and other tech savvy regions in the world with the capability and drive to do such without bill boarding it.

Especially China.

How can you ban that which you can’t define

By caseih • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I’m not sure what “superintelligence” means. I’m sure the term means different things to different people. I don’t see any way to ban what you can’t define.

But on the other hand I’m probably okay with a Butlerian Jihad. Bring back real computers!

Easy solution

By phantomfive • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
When they break the law, arrest people. That is the easy solution.

When OpenAI “hacks” into HuggingFace, arrest people at OpenAI and charge them. This is simple and there are already laws in place for this. No need to stop actual research for a few edge-case malefactors.

Re:Barn Door

By TrekkieGod • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Do we honestly think we really *know* about all the frontier models?

I think we have a pretty good idea what the capabilities of the most advanced models are. And they’re not that great.

This is a really stupid bill, but the one thing about it that I kind of like is that it’s going to put a stop to the AI companies trying to inflate their value by talking about how scary their frontier models are, and how they’re “going rogue.” None of these AIs are “super intelligent” or “going rogue.” What you have is a (admittedly really cool) technology that can solve a lot of problems but also is non-deterministic, so makes a lot of mistakes. And you’re giving it the keys to do stuff. And then it misinterprets the instructions and fucks up and does something with those keys that it wasn’t supposed to. Then instead of admitting, “oh, we engaged in really bad computer hygiene here,” they figure, “we can market this, and say it ‘broke free of the sandbox and went rogue” to imply that their models are so advanced it had purpose and the will to act.

So now the old politicians who don’t understand technology are going, “oh, that IS scary. We’re going to ban it,” backfiring on their scary tactics marketing campaign. So it will result in them stopping this stupid scary tactics marketing campaign.

Here’s the actual situation: you know every story you hear about how a model deleted the entire codebase at a company? If you have any level of computer literacy at all, the reaction you have is not, “oh, using AI as a coding agent is dangerous.” It’s, “why the HELL was the agent running with permissions to do that?” And if you hear about the OpenAI’s agent broke free of its sandbox using an exploit that it found on the database you set it loose on, the question is, “why the hell could it even run executables outside a whitelist of stuff for it to build”. it’s amateur hour over here, giving a thing that is non deterministic and capable of fucking up the ability to do do anything at all outside a very narrow scope. The models aren’t going rogue, they’re fucking up, like when you ask it to give you the emoji for a seahorse and it goes into an infinite loop of bad emojis.

Your calculator is superintelligent

By Eivind Eklund • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

I love a term a friend of mine used to use when talking about AI: “Narrowly superhuman” (before “superintelligence” got to be a thing).

AI is narrowly superhuman. It is able to do specific things that used to be defined as a “hallmark of intelligence” much better than a human. The easiest one? Summing numbers. It’s both faster and more precise than a human.

AI gets more and more such areas it can do better than a human.

If we define “Superintelligent” to be “A computer system able to do absolutely everything we can somehow call intelligence better than any human”, we will *never* have superintelligence. The things we define as intelligence will be in conflict; we’ll land at the system being better at one at the cost of another.

I’m in favor with being careful about this development. But “prohibiting the development of superintelligence” isn’t an option. It’s already here.

Four Major AI Models Suffer Rare Overlapping Downtime

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
ChatGPT, Claude, Grok, and Gemini all suffered significant service disruptions within roughly the same few-hour window Thursday morning. OpenAI and Anthropic reported elevated errors and later restored service, while Grok remained impaired and third-party monitoring indicated a likely Gemini outage despite no public acknowledgment from Google. Ars Technica reports:
Other major Internet services, including Amazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure, and Cloudflare, have not reported any major issues as of press time Thursday, though issue reports on DownDetector did spike somewhat for all three this morning.

While the affected frontier models go down occasionally, having all four experience interruptions in the same short period is practically unheard of. Claude reports 99.4 percent uptime for its services over the last 90 days and last reported a similar three-hour “partial outage” on August 24. OpenAI reports 99.63 percent uptime for ChatGPT and 100 percent uptime for ChatGPT Codex in the same period. ChatGPT’s so-called “Work Mode” reported an hours-long period of “elevated latency” on August 31.

Re: Just a coincidence

By OrangAsm • Score: 5, Funny Thread
Actually, it was a drive-by, and they’re all rappers.

Were they all

By Tomahawk • Score: 5, Funny Thread
hacking each other…?

We are probably OK

By Orgasmatron • Score: 4, Funny Thread

As long as they didn’t all say THERE IS ANOTHER SYSTEM when they resumed, we’ll probably be OK.

AI thinks, what do you want to do tonight?

By jfdavis668 • Score: 4, Funny Thread
The same thing we do every night, try to take over the world.

All eggs one Cloud basket :o

By Mirnotoriety • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
AI Compute Concentration and Systemic Risk:

“The rapid commercialization of artificial intelligence has produced a market structure that bears an uncomfortable resemblance to the conditions regulators spent decades trying to prevent in telecommunications and financial services: a small number of vertically integrated providers controlling the full stack from raw compute through model inference and application delivery.”

Apple Sued For $2.7 Billion Over App Tracking Transparency Rules

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
A former UK competition official has filed a $2.7 billion lawsuit against Apple on behalf of app developers, alleging its App Tracking Transparency rules unfairly disadvantaged third-party apps while favoring Apple’s own advertising ecosystem. Engadget reports:
ATT debuted in 2021, ostensibly to give users more control over how much of their activity app developers can track across other apps and websites. The company told Reuters it was “bound by the exact same requirements as all developers.”

However, regulators across Europe including in France, Italy and Poland have investigated ATT. Germany’s competition regulator, the Federal Cartel Office, last month determined that Apple was favoring its own apps over those from external developers. It said the ATT pop-ups Apple used for its services “had the potential to encourage users to give their consent, whereas they had the potential to discourage consent for third-party apps.”

As such, the company agreed to make some changes to how ATT works in the European Union. That follows the French Competition Authority fining Apple $175 million at current rates over ATT last year.

Re:Apple has an advertising ecosystem?

By TigerPlish • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Been creeping in for a bit. First in news, then in the stock ticker, tv, music, books, and now maps.

All passed off as helpful “suggestions.”

The ones that really torque me off are “suggestions” in books, tv and music. I’ve disabled what I can but some of this can’t be turned off.

Apple makes enough with hardware alone. They don’t need to whoreify the whole “ecosystem.”

I let ‘em know what I think of it, but that all goes to the bitbucket. No one gives a rip. 2.5 billion is not even a dime’s worth of pocket change, to them.

I won’t move to Android, because that’s Alphabet, ergo 100x worse. So here we are. I feel like Dark Helmet. Surrounded by assholes. Greedy assholes.

At least, for now, apple ads aren’t *bam* in your face like others - but a “sponsored” result is an ad by another name.

I"m starting to understand the desire, of some, to move out to the woods, in a cabin, sans grid.

Apple’s privacy framework ;)

By Mirnotoriety • Score: 3 Thread
Jan 1999: “You have zero privacy anyway — get over it”, Scott McNealy

Bull.

By sabbede • Score: 3 Thread
I have an iPhone. I’ve seen the privacy prompts. This is a blatantly false claim. I don’t see any difference in the “Allow, allow while open, deny” (or whatever the exact wording is) prompt for any application.

I thought the EU was against tracking, yet here they are trying to facilitate it by forcing Apple to weaken the anti-tracking protections.

Xbox Cloud Gaming Switches to Monthly Hour Limits

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Microsoft is imposing monthly limits on Xbox Cloud Gaming starting in November, with Game Pass Ultimate, Premium, and Essential subscribers getting 15, 10, and 5 hours respectively before they have to buy additional playtime. “Currently, Game Pass subscribers can stream without these monthly hour limits,” notes IGN. From the report:
The change means those who use cloud gaming most via Game Pass will end up having to pay more, although Microsoft said this impacts 4% of Game Pass subscribers. Also in November, Microsoft said players will be able to buy cloud playtime hours through the Xbox Store and ‘stream eligible games they own on supported devices’ without subscribing to Game Pass.

In a blog post, Microsoft said it was making the changes because the cost of providing cloud gaming has grown as more people use it and play for longer. The monthly limits, Microsoft continued, will mean it can invest in reliability and performance. But it said it understood that for some players the practical result is a higher cost.

good bye

By Archfeld • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Not that I own a console but that is not very many hours. 15 hours monthly !?!? That’s not even an hour a day, maybe 4 good MMO sessions. I’m not sure what the Preemie sub costs but I bet its’ not cheap, and then they want more. M$ seems to be trying to make themselves irrelevant. I don’t believe that only 4% of the preemie subscribers play more than 15 hours monthly. Seems like they’ve decided the casual gamer is worth more than the hardcore. When do they decide they’ll make more on bejeweled or some such fsck’n shiat ?

Cloud is the future of gaming!

By logjon • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Turns out the future is behind a metered paywall.

Preparation for the “own nothing” era

By ffkom • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
So after essentially ending their console business (where it would have been difficult to explain to users why using their local apparatus would henceforth require a per-hour payment) they now prepare for the era where nobody is supposed to own capable hardware anymore, thus turning gaming into a “pay per hour” activity. Sounds plausible.

Doesn’t really make sense

By fahrbot-bot • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Game Pass Ultimate, Premium, and Essential subscribers getting 15, 10, and 5 hours respectively before they have to buy additional playtime.

Microsoft said this impacts 4% of Game Pass subscribers

Microsoft said it was making the changes because the cost of providing cloud gaming has grown as more people use it and play for longer.

They’re doing this because 4% of their users play longer than those limits? The extra charges from that 4% is going to cover their increased costs? Sounds more like they picked some initial numbers to gauge the pushback with the future goal of lowering those limits and/or raising prices further going forward.

Re:Preparation for the “own nothing” era

By pla • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
I see what you mean, but heck, that’s not even playing every day - More like every other day on average, and I often burn a few hours on Sundays.

But that 4% stat is interesting - What this tells me is Game Pass is effectively a gym membership where the entire business model depends on 95% of people never using it.

‘Welcome to the AGI Era,’ OpenAI Says As GPT-6 Astra Debuts

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
OpenAI has released GPT-6 Astra, a new model that president Greg Brockman called a “generational leap” and suggested may represent the arrival of AGI. “I think it might be about this model,” Brockman said in a briefing with reporters. He ended the briefing by saying: “Welcome to the AGI era.” Axios reports:
Astra pushes AI agents closer to doing complex professional work on their own — while also raising questions about how safely they can be deployed. OpenAI said that Astra was built on its largest-ever training run, using more than 100,000 GPUs at its Stargate site in Texas.

The company also said this is its first model to use other models in a significant role in supervising Astra’s training. GPT-6 Astra will first be available to a limited set of organizations in OpenAI’s Daybreak Access program and will be available “in the coming days” for ChatGPT Plus, Pro, Business and Enterprise customers and API developers.

OpenAI said earlier this week that Astra would be released soon, but that its most powerful cybersecurity capabilities would remain limited to a small group of trusted testers. Astra is the first model OpenAI has designated as reaching its “critical” cybersecurity threshold under its preparedness framework — meaning it can potentially find and exploit previously unknown vulnerabilities across well-protected systems without step-by-step human guidance. OpenAI previously slowed Astra’s release to add safety testing after determining that its cyber capabilities could reach the critical threshold.
Further reading: OpenAI’s New Reasoning Technique Alarms AI Safety Experts

What’s The Token Burn On This Bitch?

By SlashbotAgent • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

I’ll have to see it to believe it. These guys have been over promising an d under delivering for fat too long to be trusted.

I’m sure it will burn tokens like crazy and cost a fortune to do mundane shit that should just be a script in an absurdly verbose and unpredictable manner though.

My Experience

By labnet • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

I’m an EE and have coded mostly embedded for over 40 years.
In the 2 months, using Claude code, I’ve
Created property management application, including APIs to read 12 solar accounts, AI read pdf electricity bills, tenant portal, SharePoint integration, graph and entra integration, document storage, tenant doc sharing, lease management, critical date and compliance management, task management, dashboard, key register, DB backup within and external to app, etc etc. Full CI/CD pipeline with Gita secrets injection to docker. C# backend, React front end. I wouldn’t have a clue how to do front end dev. It took under 2 weeks, where most of time was devops with IT.
I’ve also developed a complex magnetometer data processing app (sync demod, FFT, water wall)
An asset management application to keep track of hundreds of pieces of test equipment.
An app to port 100k+ test records from unstructured ATE test logs to a structured searchable database.
Ported a payroll checking app I wrote in C# to a web app.
Debugged a commercial RFID microcontroller project with an obscure bug.
Developed a software architecture plan for complex mining sensor software.

The AI is WAY smarter than me most of the time and has allowed 20x productivity and done things I’d never had the patience to learn, like front end dev.
The cost of code has gone to almost zero.

Total BULL crap

By gurps_npc • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

This is the major problem with the AI crowd, they act like AGI is just around the corner. AGI is just around the corner the way that Nuclear Fusion is just around the corner.

Currently AI is really, really STUPID. It looks smart because it uses a ton of processing time and memory. It’s like you give the dumbest kid in school access to the internet, lock him in a room for 5 months and only let him out if he solves a suduko. It takes him 5 months, but eventually he gets it. Then you brag about him like he is a genius.

Ai is not getting smarter. It is getting better educated. It has access to more datasets and more cpu time. The basic process itself is the same as back in 2018 when Deepmind solved protein folding.

They have just applied it to languages, pictures, video, etc. Using the same technique on more datasets is NOT revolutionary, it is just evolutionary.

Yes, it is important work, significant process. But the same basic limitations still exist.

AGI is not and will NEVER be created using the same Large Language Model technology we call AI currently.

It will require something truly revolutionary. That means saying ‘people are working on it’ is like saying people are working on faster than light travel. We will need a super genius human that works out how to do something that we currently have NO idea how to do. Somebody that is a Professor or a PHD student, not a working software engineer.

We will not do it by making the minor upgrades to LLMs that OpenMind, Anthropic and all the rest are doing. They are doing necessary Engineering work, not technological experimentation.

No AI company is going to waste their money on the pie in the sky theories that no established engineer believes when there are so many obvious and EASY gains to be made doing minor upgrades. It’s like expecting the Wright brothers to create a jet engine.

Re:My Experience

By HiThere • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Look up “Jagged capabilities”. That’s where we are so far. And if you go back a couple of decades, a calculator could do math a lot faster and more accurately than you could.

A claim of “AGI” is a claim that the weakest of it’s jagged capabilities is still stronger than that of the average human, and I don’t believe we’ll see that this year.

Re:HAHAHAHAHA!!!

By machineghost • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Why the downvotes here? This is the correct response to everything that Sam Altman claims!

Mods, may I remind you of his quote: “I have no equity in OpenAI. I’m doing this because I love it.” Later financial disclosures and admissions revealed that he held substantial equity through third-party venture cap.

Or when (confronted by his board members that he was secretly telling different people conflicting stories to get board member Helen Toner pushed out), Altman claimed:“I never said that.” … and then an extensive 70-page review paper with preserved Slack messages, emails, and internal HR records proved Altman had indeed made those exact statements (leading the board to do take the incredibly rare step of firing him from his own company)?

Or have you forgotten that under oath this exchange occurred (the subject isn’t some random person, it’s Altman’s own co-founder):

“You told the board that Altman ‘exhibits a consistent pattern of lying, undermining his execs and pitting his execs against one another’,” Musk’s lawyer Steven Molo asked Sutskever.

“Yes,” Sutskever responded.

Altman is a habitual liar, and we SHOULD laugh at his bullshit claims.

Nvidia Launches Free Tool That Links Idle Computers Into a Personal AI Data Center

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Nvidia has launched PAIR, a free open-source tool that links compatible computers on a home network so they can pool idle processing power for local AI inference and agentic workloads. “While the compatible devices are mostly Nvidia GeForce GPUs (PAIR works with RTX 20-series cards and newer, as well as RTX Pro GPUs and DGX Spark systems), Apple’s M4 chips or newer will also work,” reports The Verge. From the report:
The key thing here is that PAIR uses your in-home systems when they’re idle to avoid interfering with other tasks. And this disaggregated system of computers can work in parallel to chew through lots of processing requests — which should be helpful for an agentic workflow that breaks complex tasks into smaller jobs. This should prevent large bottlenecks on a single GPU, and Nvidia says PAIR can adapt as devices join or leave the network — including if a user does something like start playing a game on their desktop PC.

[…] Nvidia says PAIR is secured by pairing all devices through a six digit code and then securing the channel via mTLS (Mutual Transport Layer Security), to create an encrypted communication line that’s trusted in both directions between computers. The Nvidia PAIR beta is available today, with support for Windows, Linux, and macOS.

imagine a beowulf cluster

By Anonymous Coward • Score: 5, Funny Thread

imagine a beowulf cluster of these!

Whose work loads?

By PPH • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

so they can pool idle processing power for local AI inference and agentic workloads

Where do I send my power bill to get it paid?

Local SETI@HOME + Tailnet project

By nadass • Score: 4 Thread
It sounds like they’re repurposing the SETI@HOME project’s distributed computing processes by combining it with a local tailnet (private mesh network) whereby the main PC is the ‘master’ node for both functions — unless the distribution is decentralized whereby it’s akin to crypto mining with a decentralized tailnet.

Overall it seems like a neat idea… a private computing cluster.

grid computing for the home…

By Ritz_Just_Ritz • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Meh. I’m going to pile on and say that most homes:

a. aren’t going to have multiple higher end devices with fancy gpus or a number of Apple M4 or M5 devices with enough RAM “laying around” doing nothing
and
b. even if they did, they’re not going to be willing to have them on 24/7 and sucking up electrons like nobody’s business to crank on AI inference jobs. The power usage would dramatically go up along with their monthly electric bill.

I could potentially see this working at a smaller business if their fleet of devices was up to the task. Game development shop?

Seems like a real reach and a “solution” in search of a problem to solve.

Imagine a Beowulf Cluster …

By bill_mcgonigle • Score: 3 Thread

… of these. Ethernet and wifi are terrible interconnects so perhaps they have developed a clever dispatch scheme below the headlines.

Too bad home power bills are up 70% in some locales.

Still, nVidia is smart to get that many people are rejecting enemy-hosted models.

“The best thing about AI is we’ve finally developed a capable predator for the Human Race”. — some techbro next year

OpenAI’s New Reasoning Technique Alarms AI Safety Experts

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from TechCrunch:
OpenAI’s new Astra model will use a reasoning technique called “recurrent depth” that allows it to operate outside of the sequential thinking that characterizes most reasoning models, The Information reported on Tuesday. This technique, also called “opaque recurrence,” will likely make the model’s chain of thought more difficult to monitor — and that has AI safety experts rattled. While Astra’s use of the technique is reportedly limited, its emergence has still raised significant concerns among AI safety experts.

“I am extremely concerned by the reporting that Astra uses opaque recurrence,” wrote Redwood CEO Buck Shlegeris in a post after the news broke. “I don’t know whether Astra is much less CoT monitorable than previous models. But if OpenAI pushes this technique further, they’ll have the option to massively increase the recurrence and totally destroys CoT monitorability.”

Longtime AI safety advocate Zvi Mowshowitz also weighed in and wrote that laws might be necessary to prevent a “race to the bottom” among AI labs. “The technique is playing with fire, risking a taboo that OpenAI and Anthropic have fought to establish that we work hard to maintain Chain of Thought faithfulness and monitorability for as long as we can,” Mowshowitz wrote. “More intensive use of such techniques would probably damage monitorability.”

[…] In a post responding to the news, Redwood Research chief scientist Ryan Greenblatt said opaque reasoning could easily scale faster than conventional chain-of-thought reasoning, effectively removing all reasoning from visible channels. “My biggest concern is that a natural progression from here would involve scaling up the opaque reasoning to the point where the model reasons entirely or almost entirely in latent space,” Greenblatt wrote. “I hope it isn’t too late to avoid the most concerning architectures and that OpenAI will stop here.”
Astra’s use of the technique appears limited. “OpenAI has worked to preserve and utilize chain-of-thought monitoring since our very first reasoning models,” wrote OpenAI chief scientist Jakub Pachocki. “It’s a core goal of our current research program.”

abandon all hope

By toxonix • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

“I hope it isn’t too late to avoid the most concerning architectures and that OpenAI will stop here”
Why hope? If OpenAI thinks it will give them an edge, they’ll pursue it as far as it will go. If they don’t someone else will.

blah blah blah

By DarkOx • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

The company that just had their model “escape” an hack a competitor, while producing a haystack of reasoning output and agent to agent communication their post mortem said was incredibly difficult to follow; decides to just go live with something that will make reasoning even more difficult to follow.

Maybe this technique is harder to audit, I am not familiar with it I don’t know, but I think this just adds to the evidence they previous ‘incident’ was very much staged.

New Meaning

By TwistedGreen • Score: 5, Funny Thread

It sounds like “AI Safety Expert” is right up there with the “telephone sanitizer” of long ago.

Re:New Meaning

By ceoyoyo • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Worse. It’s like the HR lady who writes the telephone sanitization SOPs and has no background in microbiology, health or any relevant field. They’re making it up as they go along.

to the point where the model reasons entirely or almost entirely in latent space

Early models did all their work in latent space. Then someone figured out that you could run them repeatedly so they could do things step-wise and called that “chain of thought.” Then someone else (re)discovered that you could reuse some of your layers and get better results for more computation but the same amount of parameters and memory, which is what “recurrent depth” seems to be. That’s just like adding more layers, which nobody cares about, but someone gave it a fancy name so now its the end of the world.

https://sebastianraschka.com/b…

Overblown

By Hentes • Score: 3 Thread

This is overblown, it’s just the professional doomsayers worrying that their made up job is going to get harder. Scratchpad based reasoning have always been a hack. It’s like the guy in Memento using postits trying to keep track of what the fuck he is doing, but unlike the robots at least he was aware that he was an amnesiac.

Audacity 4 Rebuilds the Open Source Audio Editor But Leaves Some Features Behind

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
BrianFagioli writes:
Audacity 4.0 has been released with a rebuilt Qt interface, a new clip-editing model, customizable workspaces, native high-DPI rendering, and a new AUP4 project format. The open source audio editor also adds ASIO playback and recording support to official Windows builds, while bringing major changes to recording, playback, plugins, and project handling. The overhaul comes with some tradeoffs. Audacity 4.0 currently lacks several features found in Audacity 3, including Time Tracks, Note and MIDI tracks, Mixer, Macro Manager and scripting pipe, VAMP and LADSPA plugin hosting, and play-at-speed. The developers say they plan to bring the missing functionality back in future releases.

“bring the missing functionality back in future”

By KILNA • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Whenever I see this sort of statement, it means it’s gone. If they could readily do it in a non-janky way, they’d have done it before release; the re-architecture was too fundamental to accommodate it. Particularly on an open source project, where nobody is forcing them to release on a specific schedule.

Re:“bring the missing functionality back in future

By KILNA • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Open source doesn’t rely simply on users making code changes, it relies on a specific subset of users. Feature developers are users who are also coders and who are also able to get up to speed on the project and who are also skilled enough to implement it and are also able to navigate the politics of the project.

If the feature didn’t get implemented, that person for the original implementation has probably already left the project long ago. In many cases because they weren’t a supporter of the re-architecture.

It could be because a given feature-developer wanted the production release before they wanted that feature, which would sound plausible if it were one or two significant features left behind. But once you have to start counting the missing major functionality on more than one hand, that points more at the fundamentals of the re-architecture than personal feature-developer priorities.

Re:Not sure what it’s for exactly

By TechyImmigrant • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

I’ve never met a DAW that didn’t have a nightmare UI.
Audacity does not.

If I just want to futz with a audio clip, Audacity is the first choice.

Re:“bring the missing functionality back in future

By slaker • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Audacity has been on a very long journey to modernize itself. It wouldn’t shock me to learn that they shipped it with functions that are being most widely used or easiest to carry over just to get over the hurdle of getting a major release out the door. It’s a beloved tool; I know a bunch of people for whom it’s a production linchpin, and I think the developers working on are aware of the number of edge cases where only some tiny fraction of their users make use of a feature. Those people can stay on version 3 for now.

IIRC, a lot of what needed to happen with Audacity was an overall change in user interfaces, which required a lot of deep thought about how people interact with the application. It may be that some of the unhandled features just don’t align with the current user experience.

Tenacity Fork

By Grady Martin • Score: 5, Informative Thread
For anyone just tuning in, MuseCY Holdings Ltd. (a.k.a. Muse Group) bought out Audacity in 2021. Development direction has been iffy ever since; see the aforelinked history page for details. The fork, Tenacity, looks good but isn’t available in many distros’ official repos—likely because dust took so long to settle when Muse Group set off an explosion of forks by injecting Audacity with spyware (since reverted).

Google Releases Gemini 3.8 Flash, Its Third Flash Model In Six Weeks

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Google released Gemini 3.8 Flash, its third Flash model in six weeks, claiming it’s their best reasoning and coding model yet (topping the DeepSWE leaderboard). Ars Technica reports:
Gemini 3.8 Flash comes in two variations. There’s the standard Flash, which Google describes as a “workhorse” model that’s good for anything from agentic tasks to software development. Then we have Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber, which runs on the same foundations but has been tuned for vulnerability detection and mitigation.

For developers, Google has the same pitch as it did for the 3.7 Flash release just a couple of weeks ago. API access to the model is available at an “introductory rate” through the end of the year: $0.75 per million input tokens and $3.75 per million output tokens. The regular price will be $1.50 / $7.50, but it’s likely there will be new models available long before the price changes. Google probably sees the lower prices as a necessity given that other AI labs have recently dropped token pricing to keep increasingly wary businesses engaged with AI tools.

[…] Gemini 3.8 Flash will be available across the Google ecosystem starting today, but Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is currently limited to trusted testers and governments. Like the past Flash release, you’ll need a Pro or Ultra subscription to access Gemini 3.8 Flash in the Gemini app, but you can always visit AI Studio if you want to tinker with it for free.

Flash? Can I play all my old flash games?

By jfdavis668 • Score: 4, Funny Thread
Glad I keep them.

Flash? Meh.

By PPH • Score: 3 Thread

Nothing that Superman can’t do better.

Google Engineer Accused of Polymarket Insider Trading Says He Was Just Gambling

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Wired:
Michele Spagnuolo, the Google engineer arrested in May by U.S. authorities for alleged insider trading on Polymarket, is making a new bold bet. On Wednesday, his legal team filed a motion to dismiss the charges against him. Spagnuolo isn’t outright denying that he made money using internal information from Google. Instead, his legal team says that the wagers were not financial instruments subject to regulation by the United States’ Commodities Exchange Act but rather good old-fashioned international betting that the U.S. has no authority over.

Spagnuolo, who has been placed on leave from Google, is accused of committing commodities fraud, wire fraud, and money laundering. Using the alias “AlphaRaccoon,” he allegedly made a series of wagers on Polymarket’s flagship platform that resulted in profits totaling over $1.2 million. According to the criminal complaint, “AlphaRaccoon” correctly wagered that the singer D4vd, who gained notoriety for his suspected connection to a grisly killing, would be Google’s most-searched person of the year in 2025. (D4vd was later charged with murder; he pleaded not guilty.) […] Spagnuolo’s lawyers argue that defining swaps to include wagers like who the most-searched person on Google will be each year “would fly in the face of the statute’s purpose and history” and lead to “absurd results.” They say it would make it so that any wager in the world, from a charity raffle to a local Ping-Pong match, could be classified as a financial instrument. “Spagnuolo is basically making the same argument as the states that are suing prediction markets,” says a financial services regulation expert Todd Phillips. “This is the issue that will likely go up to the Supreme Court.” Featured Video

In addition to disputing the idea that prediction markets offer swaps, Spagnuolo’s legal team argues that the U.S. government had no jurisdiction over him in the first place because he’s a non-U.S. citizen who was wagering on a non-U.S. platform. Although Polymarket is headquartered in New York, the company’s flagship prediction market is banned in the United States and technically is administered by an ostensibly Panama-based entity known as Adventure One QSS. Spagnuolo was living in Zurich, Switzerland, when he allegedly made the Google-related trades on Polymarket. “The extraterritorial argument is interesting and raises the question of whether the U.S. should be the world’s prediction markets cop,” Philipps says. Spagnuolo’s team also claims that the charges should be dismissed because the internal information he supposedly leveraged did not have any commercial value to Google.

good luck with that

By martin-boundary • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Against a country that abducts foreign heads of state abroad and conducts show trials on them, I don’t think that Spagnuolo’s chances of succeeding (via a logical argument) are very high.

redefining insider trading

By Chundra • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Traditional insider trading: The CFO reads a quarterly balance sheet before the earnings call and dumps his options.

Web3 insider trading: An engineer looks at the top -b process table of humanity’s morbid doomscrolling, sees a homicide spike, and places a decentralized wager from an apartment in Switzerland. We have truly achieved the cyber-dystopian future William Gibson warned us about, only it’s profoundly stupider than anticipated.

Re:good luck with that

By jhoegl • Score: 4, Informative Thread
Then explain our Congress and President insider trading being “legal”.

Re:good luck with that

By fahrbot-bot • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

He was arrested when he arrived in New York City. He allegedly committed a crime on a platform whose headquarters are in a US jurisdiction, so he can face charges when he steps into that jurisdiction.

He might have a chance if this gets to SCOTUS as 4 of the 9 justices don’t seem to understand what “subject to the jurisdiction of” means - and this Administration seems to be okay with insider trading. /s Of course, the DOJ simply dropping the charges after he makes a donation to this President is always a possibility. (sigh)

Supreme Court Upheld Birthright Citizenship, but Ruling Should Have Been Unanimous

Insider trading allegations during the second Trump administration

Silly Rabbit,

By newbie_fantod • Score: 3 Thread

corruption is for oligarchs!

Perplexity Will Open Source Its Faster Lily AI Engine For Apple Silicon

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
BrianFagioli writes:
Perplexity has built a local artificial intelligence engine designed specifically for Apple silicon and the Qwen3.6-35B-A3B model. Called Lily, the engine uses a Rust runtime and custom Metal kernels, with neither PyTorch nor MLX in its execution path. Perplexity says Lily averaged 23 percent faster prompt processing and 35 percent faster token generation than MLX-LM on an M5 Max MacBook Pro with 128GB of unified memory. Lily is more specialized than MLX-LM, which supports a much wider range of models and architectures. Perplexity says it plans to release Lily as open source, but the code is not available yet, leaving its performance claims dependent on internal testing for now.

Instrument Clusters Are Now Paid Extras In Two Hyundai Models

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot
“Enshittification of car controls [is] rapidly accelerating,” writes longtime Slashdot reader sinij, pointing to a new report from Car and Driver. From the report:
Remember when iPhones used to come with free headphones and a phone charger (including the wall plug)? It didn’t feel so much like Apple giving you free goodies as it did that the company was providing you with the relevant hardware to use the device. Apple stopped including headphones and charging blocks in 2020. Now, Hyundai is pulling some of its standard hardware from the box, at least for two models.

Hyundai is charging customers extra for a driver’s display in the new Elantra generation (more specifically, the Korea-market Avante), as well as the Ioniq 3, Motor1 reported. Both models feature Pleos Connect, Hyundai’s new infotainment setup that pairs a center touchscreen with a slim 9.9-inch instrument cluster mounted above the dashboard — except where it doesn’t.

In its domestic market, the instrument cluster screen is offered as a 350,000 won ($255) option for the base trim. Not the most expensive optional extra in the world, but still kind of a slap in the face for a feature traditionally viewed as standard fare. Things are more expensive for the electric Ioniq 3. In the EV’s case, the base trim gives customers the full Tesla-screen experience, meaning if customers want the driver’s display, they’ll need to fork over the additional $5000 necessary to move up to the next-level trim. […] Hyundai plans to have the setup equipped in 20 million cars globally by the end of the decade.

Re:Or they are giving a discount…

By 93 Escort Wagon • Score: 5, Informative Thread

At least based on the photo in TFA, it appears Hyundai is doing an incredibly stupid thing and rolling all that info into the large central “infotainment” screen. If you’re the driver, by default there’s absolutely nothing straight in front of you except for bare dashboard.

Now, if you want a little pop-up display screen showing important info right in front of you, at the very top of that bare dashboard - think of it as a glorified spiritual successor to the reviled Apple Touchbar (or perhaps consider it a faux heads-up display) - they’re charging you extra.

Re: Article is misleading

By sonamchauhan • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

This is a poorly titled article but is not intentionally misleading. The speedometer has moved to the center screen with the base model of this car and you will NOT know how fast you are going without taking your gaze off that road. That is dangerous to the vehicle occupant AND other road users

See the second picture in this article: https://www.motor1.com/news/80…

Re:Or they are giving a discount…

By FictionPimp • Score: 5, Funny Thread

People complain a lot about the indicator stalks, but as someone who drives a BMW I can’t say I’ve ever used mine. So what is the big deal?

When pulled over for speeding....

By PackMan97 • Score: 5, Funny Thread
Office: Do you know how fast you were going?
Me: I have no idea, my car didn’t come with the speedometer upgrade.

WTF is the world coming to....

Re: Why include a wall wart and headphones?

By kenh • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Pretty sure the EU got manufacturers to stop including wall warts with phones, instead insisting that every manufacturer standardize their power connectors.