Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Japan Releases Snowman-Like Asteroid Image After Flyby
  2. Meta Now Lets Anyone Use Your Instagram Photos In AI Images
  3. Doom Developer id Software Is Reportedly Losing Half Its Staff
  4. Microsoft Flips Windows Backup On By Default Outside the EU
  5. Samsung Passes Nvidia To Become Most Profitable Company In the World
  6. FCC To End Biden-Era Rule That Forces ISPs To List All Their Fees
  7. China’s DeepSeek Developing Its Own AI Chip
  8. Major Banks In Talks To Exploit Debit Card Loophole
  9. Microsoft Can Track Users Via a Windows Device ID
  10. Amazon Will Stop Accepting New Customers For Mechanical Turk
  11. Learning Another Language Appears To Slow Brain Aging By Up To 13 Years
  12. US Cyber Agency Is Using Anthropic’s Mythos To Audit Government Code
  13. GitHub Thumbs Nose At Sony’s Controversial End to Physical Media With Its Introduction of Repo CDs
  14. Research Universities Are Admitting Fewer PhDs, a Bad Sign For Science
  15. Small AI Models Gain Traction Around the World

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Japan Releases Snowman-Like Asteroid Image After Flyby

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Japan’s Hayabusa2 probe captured rare close-up images of near-Earth asteroid Torifune, revealing a snowman-like shape made of two joined lobes. Phys.org reports:
The fridge-sized Hayabusa2 skimmed asteroid Torifune on Sunday in a mission that demonstrated the ability to deflect a potentially dangerous space rock away from Earth. A new image released by the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) on Monday could aid such efforts, as researchers say near-Earth asteroids vary in their size, shape and surface characteristics.

“The moment I actually saw this image and the scientific data — it really gave me goosebumps,” JAXA scientist Yuya Mimasu told reporters, adding the asteroid “personally looked like a snowman.” The black-and-white image, captured by a telescopic camera, showed what appeared to be two round objects joined together. “You can actually see the rocks… I really hadn’t expected to be able to take a photo like this, so I’m absolutely over the moon,” he said.

[…] Moving at a speed of more than 18,000 kilometers (11,185 miles) per hour, the probe was due to fly within 800 meters (2,625 feet) of the asteroid, but JAXA said it would analyze the distance later. If confirmed, the mission would be one of the closest flybys of a near-Earth asteroid ever. JAXA also said Monday it succeeded in acquiring data from three other devices that can measure the distance from the asteroid and examine the existence of water.

Meta Now Lets Anyone Use Your Instagram Photos In AI Images

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Wired:
Meta launched its inaugural AI image model from the Meta Superintelligence Labs on Tuesday, its effort to compete with the likes of OpenAI’s GPT Images 2.0 and Google’s Nano Banana 2 in the AI image generation race. The new model, called Muse Image, rolled out with deep integrations woven into the Instagram app. As part of this update, public Instagram profiles are now automatically opted into being fodder for generative AI remixes. All someone has to do is tag your account’s profile in a prompt — if it’s public — and they can use Meta AI to generate an image using your likeness.

Meta positions this feature as a cheeky way to personalize generations with images of real people. “Whether you want to design a custom event invitation, mock up a collaborative creative concept, or generate a personalized graphic, tagging a username lets Meta AI use public photos to build a visual that’s ready to post,” reads one of Meta’s announcement blogs about the new AI tool. […] Instagram’s help center site includes more details about how this feature will impact users, saying that “people may be able to create content with your Instagram content using AI features at Meta” if you leave your account public and on the default settings. (A previously archived version of this page from 2025 does not include similar, AI-focused language.)
Instagram users who want to stop others from using their public posts for AI images (without switching your account to private) must manually disable the options under the app’s “Sharing and reuse” settings. However, turning off the setting only blocks future AI generations; any AI images already created from their content will remain.
Meta also says users will not be notified when others create AI-generated content using their posts.

Oh my

By RitchCraft • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

This is a level of creepy that is beyond belief. Yikes.

Re:Oh my

By sg_oneill • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Its insanely tone deaf too. Almost everyone I know (I hang in a circle with a lot of professional photographers and artists) either have, or are planning to, removed their instagram accounts.

Meta grossly misunderstands the level of sheer animosity the photography and arts community , the people that built it, has towards a technology that has laid waste to the economy of the creative industries and put so many photographers and artists out of work.

Seems like a great way to end up with no content!

By T34L • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

I haven’t yet met a person of flesh and blood putting effort into a drawing, photography, or even putting together nice outfits, who’d appreciate the interaction of someone modifying that content in any way only to repost it themselves. The literally sole exception is memes, where creativity of a badly cropped rehash is usually the one thing making them funny. Meta is slaughtering one of their last reasonably well performing social media platforms in a desperate effort to show off that they’re still present in the race (even with very evident last place). Extraordinary move.

Pirate, then sell back to owner

By NotEmmanuelGoldstein • Score: 3 Thread
Meta is the latest ‘tech’ giant that thinks they can get rich selling artists own work to the artists who made the work. Adobe has leverage because they have a tool-set that many artists depend upon. Meta doesn’t.

Re:Pirate, then sell back to owner

By thegarbz • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

You’re assuming Meta’s userbase is artists, rather than mostly ordinary people who don’t give a shit about preserving IP or not training AI.

Doom Developer id Software Is Reportedly Losing Half Its Staff

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Doom developer id Software is reportedly laying off about half its staff as part of Microsoft’s broader Xbox cuts. The reported layoffs potentially affects around 90 employees. Engadget reports:
While neither Microsoft nor id Software have formally acknowledged the layoffs, one former member of the studio’s staff, Michael Maynard, has echoed the 50 percent figure on LinkedIn. According to at least one of Game Developer’s sources, that could translate to around 90 job cuts, though it’s so far unclear what departments at id Software have been hit hardest.

[…] Bloomberg reported yesterday that as part of the “reset” at Xbox, ZeniMax Media, the parent company of id Software, will be focusing on its biggest franchises — like The Elder Scrolls, Fallout, Wolfenstein and Doom — going forward. It’s possible that motivated the cuts to id Software, but the developer at least outwardly appears to be already heavily focused on Doom. The studio launched Doom: The Dark Ages in 2025 and an expansion to the game on July 7, 2026. Whatever the reason, the cuts at Xbox aren’t over: While Microsoft eliminated 1,600 roles alongside the announcement that Xbox is restructuring, it still plans to lay off another 1,600 employees over the coming months.

Losing them?

By outsider007 • Score: 3 Thread

They know where they are. Their addresses are all on file.

On the plus side

By ebunga • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

This will free up more resources so they can completely destroy the rest of their businesses.

A watershed moment

By hutkept • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Doom was amazing tech, way ahead of its time, and while it changed hands, and staffing, since then, the quality of their engine and team was always a high standard. Seeing it gutted to claw back money to spend elsewhere makes me feel that AI is taking away from, rather than adding, to the awesomeness that was hacking crazy irreverent new games and software. If AI is so powerful an amplifier, then why can’t some of the most creative and hard working content creating teams be empowered and amplified by it? It seems that computing revolutions in the past were additive, PC, internet, mobile, cloud, but now AI is one of the most destructive I have ever seen.

Microsoft Flips Windows Backup On By Default Outside the EU

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Microsoft will turn on Windows settings backup and restore by default for eligible Windows 11 business devices outside the EU, starting with Windows 11 26H2. The Register reports:
Now dubbed “Windows settings backup and restore,” the service backs up a device’s settings and a list of installed Microsoft Store apps, which can then be restored to a new device. Microsoft gave a use case for the technology: “Imagine a lost laptop, a hardware refresh, or an unexpected reset. These are some of the moments when your users need backup most. And that’s rarely when anyone wants to discover that backup was never turned on.”

However, some organizations might not want it on. Perhaps those with strict privacy or data sovereignty requirements, or those regulated by the EU Digital Markets Act (DMA), for whom the default-on behavior won’t apply. Windows 11 25H2 and earlier are also excluded, as is any device with a backup policy that explicitly disables the setting. Everything else running Windows 11 26H1 will get switched on after a feature update, and the same applies to 26H2, currently with Windows Insiders in the Experimental channel.

Administrators might reasonably be wary of this being opt-out rather than opt-in. Backups are useful, but Microsoft is clear that this is not a comprehensive backup solution, calling it only “one step in a broader Windows resiliency effort.” The implications still need consideration. An opt-out setting that quietly ships settings data off-device is exactly the sort of thing that adds to administrators’ workloads rather than lightening them.

Can Microsoft touch your data inappropriately?

By ebunga • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Yes or Ask Again in Three Days

Re:There is no way your data doesn’t make it into

By Powercntrl • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Did you even read TFS? It’s a backup of the device settings and a list of installed Microsoft Store apps (which all competing app stores do anyway, otherwise they’d have no way of letting you restore previous purchases). Maybe this data has some marketing value, but they’re not using it to train AI models.

Making it opt-in by default is shady, but IIRC, Apple has iOS’s iCloud backup on by default (and quickly runs out of space and then nags you to subscribe to a paid tier). So, it’s not exactly an unprecedented consumer-hostile behavior.

Opt-in vs opt-out

By PseudoThink • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Opt-in is a backup. Opt-out is exfiltration.

I’m sure they’ve covered themselves from liability deep in a click-through EULA somewhere, though.

Re:Might be for fingerprinting

By Himmy32 • Score: 4, Informative Thread
The backups are going to be under a Microsoft user account which is already tied to device fingerprints. There’s not much more fingerprinting to be done.

Re:government repository

By Himmy32 • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Not sure what naughty stuff you have in your Windows registry or what illegal Windows Apps you downloaded from the Microsoft store are. But they already have your device guid tied to IP addresses and people who are saving their “documents” to OneDrive via “free storage” when signing in with a Microsoft account, which are both the more valuable data for law enforcement.

Since there’s not really much more mineable data than what they already have, the value add for them is more likely just keeping people tied into the ecosystem and wanting to use those Microsoft Accounts.

Samsung Passes Nvidia To Become Most Profitable Company In the World

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Samsung’s chip division is projected to earn more in 2026 than it made across its previous 40 years in semiconductors, driven by soaring AI-fueled demand for memory and storage. The company’s latest quarterly operating profit reportedly topped Nvidia’s, making Samsung the world’s most profitable tech company for the period. Tom’s Hardware reports:
Brokerage consensus puts Samsung’s full-year 2026 operating profit near 300 trillion won ($196 billion), and its second-quarter figure at about 84.6 trillion won ($55.1 billion). Samsung easily beat the consensus with $58.5 billion when it posted preliminary results on July 7, overtaking Nvidia’s most recent quarterly operating profit of $53.54 billion and becoming the most profitable technology company in the world for the period, on the back of AI-driven memory demand.

Samsung’s DS division booked 53.7 trillion won ($35.1 billion) of the company’s 57.2 trillion won in total operating profit during the first quarter of 2026, roughly 94% of the total, which is why the division’s projection sits so close to Samsung’s full-year consensus. “This year’s profit will exceed the cumulative profit generated over the past 40 years since we entered the semiconductor business,” Kim Yong-Kwan told staff, scoping the claim to the chip business rather than the wider conglomerate.
Further reading: Samsung Chip Workers To Get $340,000 Average Bonus In AI Boom

Lawsuit Targets Samsung, others, price fixing.

By doug141 • Score: 3 Thread

But they cheated. https://www.cnet.com/tech/comp…

Build robots and rockets

By backslashdot • Score: 3 Thread

Samsung should get into the robotics and reusable rockets business ASAP.

To the detriment of the rest of the company

By aaarrrgggh • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Unfortunately for Samsung the chip business is going to cause a lot of pain in all the other divisions. Apparently phones, tvs, and white goods are all dramatically reducing product offerings, staffing, and general competitiveness.

FCC To End Biden-Era Rule That Forces ISPs To List All Their Fees

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
The FCC plans to roll back broadband label rules that require ISPs to itemize all passthrough fees. Under the proposal, providers could instead list a single “up to” amount for location-based charges. It would also allow ISPs to link to pricing labels rather than display them prominently, while eliminating machine-readable pricing files. Ars Technica reports:
ISPs routinely advertise prices much lower than those actually charged to consumers on their monthly bills. One method of raising monthly bill prices above advertised rates is to tack on fees that, ISPs claim, are used to offset charges imposed by local governments. ISPs would be well within their rights to advertise accurate monthly prices and charge those exact prices on monthly bills. But because ISPs rarely do that, the FCC has required them to make specific price disclosures to consumers for the past decade. The Biden-era FCC updated the broadband-label rules to require that ISPs "itemize on the label (PDF) all discretionary monthly fees that the provider passes through to the consumer.” The change drew protest from Comcast and other ISPs that complained bitterly about the complexity of listing all the hidden fees they had chosen to charge.

Under Chairman Brendan Carr, the Trump FCC has steadily whittled away at requirements imposed under Democrats. An order (PDF) released in draft form last week would eliminate the requirement to itemize passthrough fees and let ISPs list them in a single “up to” amount. The “up to” amount can include both government fees and fees charged by non-government entities such as owners of utility poles. “Rather than continuing to require providers to itemize ‘passthrough fees’ that can vary by location, we allow providers to display such fees in the aggregate, either as a maximum or ‘up to’ amount for the total fees applicable in any location where the service plan is offered, or as the exact total of such fees assessed in a particular location,” the FCC draft order said.

The order to be voted on later this month includes a few other changes that will please ISPs and their lobby groups. ISPs will be allowed to provide links to price labels instead of displaying the full labels prominently on ordering pages and account portals, and will be allowed to stop making the price-label information available in machine-readable spreadsheets. The FCC is also relaxing the requirement that price information be available over the phone. The FCC said the change will “allow phone sales representatives to present label information conversationally, as a summary of key label fields, rather than require verbatim recitation.”

The changes have been in the works since October 2025, when the FCC issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to let the public submit comments on the proposals. The outcome of that process is the draft order, which will be voted on at the FCC’s July 22 meeting and take effect 30 days after it is published in the Federal Register. There are many types of passthrough fees that ISPs will be able to stop listing individually and roll into the “up to” amount. The FCC defined the fees as follows, saying they include just about anything that isn’t a tax […]. Another planned change will eliminate a requirement that providers archive all labels for at least two years after a service plan is no longer available. The Utility Reform Network, an advocacy group, told the FCC that the archived labels provide crucial data about how prices and services change over time, and that machine-readable labels are important for affordability research and information accessibility.

Re:Transparency

By Anonymous Coward • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Well, he is the most transparently corrupt.

Re:Half of the country voted for this

By fahrbot-bot • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

It’s a reason I have grown more and more favorable to some sort of compulsory voting like Australia does but I don’t think it would fly over here.

I’d be in favor of that, but could easily see it challenged on 1st Amendment grounds - though I’d counter by proposing a “None” option on the ballot, so at least you participated. If voting was mandatory, it should also be a national holiday or people should otherwise be allowed time off from work to vote, as well as early in-person voting, and voting my mail would definitely have to be allowed, postmarked by election day. You have to provide various opportunities to vote if it’s required…

I’ll add that my personal feeling is that if you don’t vote/participate, you don’t get to complain.

Re:Government of the Corporation

By Smonster • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
I think the bigger thing is that a significant percentage of the population is more concerned with fitting in with their tribe than they are with thinking critically. Furthmore, a good percentage of those people are only minimally capable of thinking critically about a situation. Those people have the same vote I do. Well, not exactly. I live in a so called purple state of divided government, aka a swing state. Still, on the state level the percentages are similar. When people are able to blatantly lie and transmit that lie over and over with effective anonymity to influence the easily influence with zero negative consequences we get the government we have today.

We get a government which no longer represents the people, but instead enacts laws and polices favoring those who give them the most money. The saddest thing is that the voting public is entirely capable of putting an end to it. Well....we would be if so many of us were not so selfish, apathetic, gullible, and/or just down right dumb. It is no coincidence public education is attacked by the republicans. However, the democrats don’t do themselves any favors with how the public school systems are run in our biggest cities either.

Re:Half of the country voted for this

By twocows • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
I wouldn’t say half the country voted to this (even ignoring voter turnout etc). Political parties in the US are bundle packages; you can’t get your pet issue a la carte, you have to get a bunch of other stuff with it. I voted for Harris in 2024 primarily because, despite agreeing with some conservative positions such as skepticism around many DEI initiatives, I felt Trump would severely injure our international relations at a time where we needed to project both strength and unity in the face of Russian aggression (and I think that has played out — I don’t think he’s been good for IR). Weighing all things together, I felt Harris was the better choice. That doesn’t mean I voted “for” everything Harris stood for, at least not intentionally. Functionally, yeah, my vote would have contributed to the progression of those things I didn’t like as well, but not because I supported them. The system isn’t set up to allow me to separate out these different things, so I vote based on the prioritization of all the different pros and cons. By the same token, the people who voted for Trump may not have agreed with every single last thing he said.

I think one of the failures of our way of doing things is that the wide variety of nuance your average voter has can’t come across clearly because every single political party and candidate is a bundle package. I don’t like it, I think we should consider trying to do things in a different way.

Re:Now do it for groceries

By Burdell • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

For most businesses, they have to price all their products and services to include all their costs. For some reason, telecom companies get away with taking on “cost of us doing business” fees like crazy. For your grocery comparison, it’d be like picking up a $5 box of cookies, and getting a $1.27 “accounting fee” and $0.69 “stocking fee”.

The ever-popular “regulatory recovery fee” is just a “you paid most of our employees through the service price, but we’re going to hide paying our accountants”. It’s absurd; the price of the service should cover ALL of the service. Showing taxes and external fees is okay (although they need to be clearly presented with the price); that’s how most US retail works already.

China’s DeepSeek Developing Its Own AI Chip

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Reuters:
Chinese startup DeepSeek is developing its own AI chip, according to three people familiar with the matter, a push that could reduce its reliance on Nvidia and Huawei chips, which it has depended on to train and run its globally popular models. The chip is designed for inference — the stage of AI computing in which a trained model generates responses for users — rather than for training new models, the sources said. If successful, DeepSeek’s expansion into semiconductor development would mark a major strategic shift for a company widely hailed in China as the country’s AI champion, potentially adding to challenges faced by Chinese tech giant Huawei.

Not surprised

By kyoko21 • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Given that they have optimized the crap out of the software they probably feel like they have done everything short of going assembly. But if you’re going assembly you might as well just full send and make the hardware itself then you own the assembly.

It will be interesting to see where they go with this.

Lithography

By Himmy32 • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Buried at the end of the article hints at the real story:

Designing a competitive AI chip typically takes years and significant capital. Manufacturing poses another hurdle as the U.S. bans Chinese designers from accessing the most advanced overseas foundries, while separate U.S. curbs have cut China’s access to high-bandwidth memory, a component critical to AI inference chips.

Not having access to ASML’s lithography puts any of these efforts at a pretty serious disadvantage. So companies making designs isn’t really the story to watch but the outcome of Chinese lithography experiments.

Re:Lithography

By DarkOx • Score: 4, Informative Thread

For sure, Chinese chip making success or failure will be the real story.

A bunch of people are going to jump in now and say “derp see sanctions and tariffs … have driven them toward domestic development”

No, this is not the case. The CCP wants a mono-polar world where they enjoy total hegemony. They have had their eye on the prize for two decades at least now. If you look at PRC history as far as ‘friend factories’ and collaborative efforts with soviet-bloc nations, and other technology transfer partnerships they have set the their sights on manufacturing industries ag, machine tools, aircraft, etc they see as critical and found someone willing to sell them some kind of on-the-job training that then enables them to develop independent domestic capabilities. They dump a ton of second-rate but useful product into the market place until they can grow enough domestic capacity and then they expand into the higher end of the market for their own domestic consumption.

Its like DRAM, China has been building out the capability to manufacture top-draw memory products for more than just the last two years, but they are getting their now, and its going to pay off big if we are dumb enough to let it.

China is going to develop a leading edge process chips industry period. Short of bombing them nothing will stop that..

Which of course brings us to the legitimate capitol of China (Taiwan) and our own dangerous dependence on them for those very same products. Either we need to be making damn sure we have domestic replacement or we need to be making a lot more aggressive/realistic plans for not just preventing an invasion but keeping the trade routes open.

Re:Lithography

By drnb • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Not having access to ASML’s lithography puts any of these efforts at a pretty serious disadvantage. So companies making designs isn’t really the story to watch but the outcome of Chinese lithography experiments

Or industrial espionage.

Or offering joint ventures to get the tech into the country and the workforce trained up.

Don’t be too excited

By allo • Score: 3 Thread

Don’t be too excited. It will only work in a limited set of servers and not with the standard AI frameworks. So even if you get the card, you probably can’t run it. If you get the full server, you still need to rewrite your code. Unfortunately this isn’t just a Nvidia clone you plug in and have fun with.

Major Banks In Talks To Exploit Debit Card Loophole

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
JPMorgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, PNC, and other major banks have reportedly explored acquiring Fiserv’s debit-card networks, STAR and Accel, in a move that could help them bypass federal caps on debit-card transaction fees. A law limits the fees big banks can charge merchants, but only if the transactions are routed through an outside network. There are no caps on these interchange fees over a bank-owned network, however. The Wall Street Journal reports:
When Capital One Financial bought Discover Financial in a $50.6 billion deal, it got a network that cut out the need for a middleman in card transactions and allowed it to deal more directly with merchants. Now, big banks are looking on with envy because owning a network can mean exemption from a federal law that caps debit-card fees. Those fees collectively amount to billions of dollars each year across the industry, but banks have long complained the government-defined cap limits their ability to offer customers debit-card rewards and other services. Some have been exploring a small deal that could upend the rules, though they are worried about political backlash if they try.

Big banks including JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Wells Fargo and PNC Financial Services Group have in recent months held preliminary and tentative discussions about a deal to acquire a network owned by the financial-technology company Fiserv, according to people familiar with the matter. There is no certainty a deal will happen. Several of the banks that looked at the Fiserv network have already decided it would be unlikely for them to move forward, some of the people said. Some have privately expressed concern that such a deal could prompt backlash from lawmakers, regulators and merchants, the people added.

Re:debit card rewards

By cruff • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Yup, these rewards are really scammy. Just give me lower prices up front so I can buy what I want, not random reward crap.

Re:debit card rewards

By hAckz0r • Score: 5, Informative Thread
That “reward” comes from the money the merchant pays, and then they just raise the price of the product to compensate for their calculated loss. Rewards are not free magic money, you actually paid that money up front when you bought the product, and here the CC company is just giving you a mere fraction of that increase in price back to you, just to make you feel good. Are people really this stupid?

Re:debit card rewards

By Bill, Shooter of Bul • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
No, No no. Silly people who think they understand things. The money is charged to the merchant, yes thats true. However, you with a rewards card get charged the same price as Joe Schmoe who does not have a rewards card. You are paying less because you get the reward. Joe Schmoe is getting screwed. So get the rewards you can so you pay lower prices.

At What Point Does It Rise To Collusion?

By SlashbotAgent • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

JPMorgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, PNC… reportedly explored acquiring Fiserv’s debit-card networks, STAR and Accel, in a move that could help them bypass federal caps on debit-card transaction fees.

So at what point does this rise to the definition of collusion? This seems to fit my understanding of the definition.

I never use my debit card,…

By Anonymous Coward • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

…and use a credit card instead. Why?

A debit card is a direct line to your bank account. If someone fraudulently steals money from my account, that’s my problem.

A credit card is a buffer (with a limit) between a thief and my bank account. If someone compromises my credit card, that’s the bank’s problem.

Microsoft Can Track Users Via a Windows Device ID

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
A criminal complaint against alleged Scattered Spider member Peter Stokes revealed that Microsoft can associate Windows activity with a persistent “Global Device ID,” which investigators used to link his PC to online activity connected to a hack. While unique device IDs are common, the case has raised privacy concerns because the identifier can apparently persist across updates, has no simple opt-out, and may allow Microsoft to connect a Windows installation to activity on third-party services. PCMag reports:
Last week, the U.S. announced it had extradited 19-year-old Peter Stokes from Europe for allegedly being a member of the notorious hacking group Scattered Spider. But the case stands out because Microsoft played a key role in linking Stokes to the suspected hacking crimes, according to an unsealed criminal complaint. Stokes allegedly hacked an unnamed luxury jewelry retailer in May 2025 while using a VPN. The 39-page criminal complaint shows the FBI used Microsoft records to discover that his IP address was associated with a Microsoft device identifier known as Global Device ID (GDID).

“According to a Microsoft representative, a Global Device Identifier in the Windows ecosystem is a persistent, device-level identifier designed to uniquely identify an installation of a Windows operating system on a device, either a physical device (e.g., a mobile phone or laptop) or virtual machine, across certain Microsoft services and scenarios,” the complaint explains. The global device ID isn’t exactly surprising, given that it’s standard practice to assign a unique ID to each account or device so a tech provider can recognize and distinguish between them. But the complaint reveals Microsoft can associate the GDID with third-party services and the timing as well, giving Redmond a way to theoretically track a user’s online activity. In other words, Redmond might be able to track the online activity of your Windows PC without third-party browser cookies.

Stokes was discovered exploiting a web development tool called ngrok to bypass the jewelry retailer’s network defenses. The complaint says Microsoft had records showing that on May 12, 2025, at 19:21 UTC, the GDID associated with Stokes’ computer “accessed, among other ngrok pages, ‘https://dashboard[.]ngrok.com/signup,’ the ngrok page to set up an ngrok account.” The document adds that Microsoft records also showed the GDID accessing “multiple sites” from servers at Tzulo, a web hosting provider, to help pull off the hack. Hence, the fact that federal investigators used the Microsoft identifier to nab a suspected hacker is raising concerns that it could be abused for other surveillance purposes. “Microsoft Windows is surveillance software,” cybersecurity expert Matthew Hickey alleged in a tweet.

Maybe Microsft knew something that we didn’t

By hwstar • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Assigning unique id’s to devices connected to the Internet would be welcomed by open arms by the government. The government would then be able to track every computer just like Flock is doing with roadside ALPR’s.

Also, age verification becomes a whole lot easier with per-device ID’s,

Although linking a person to a specific device would still be something the government would have to prove in court, they could use other methods to prove that a specific person was using a computer at a specific time.

Per device ID’s would have a chilling effect on free speech online.

Let’s hope this doesn’t get shoved down the throats of Linux users.

Fingerprinting

By Archangel Michael • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Its called fingerprinting, and it has been going on a very long time, using techniques that go back decades. This just makes it more persistent and spans attempts to obfuscate fingerprinting in easier ways.

If you want to avoid this, work from a non-persistent VM that is created and destroyed every online session, using no identifiable information (no-logins ever).

Security isn’t convenient.

Re:Linux has IDs as well.

By unrtst • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Such as GUID partitions, if they want to track you on Linux, they will.

HAHAHAHHAAHHAH AHAHAH WTF ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT!?!?!

The correlation of Windows Device ID to site URLs visited at a specific time seems to be the key. Visited URL’s (the website) do NOT get the Device ID in the traffic. That ID + IP + time would need logged somewhere for this.

AFAICT, Microsoft retains a log that includes the users IP address (apparent and real?), Device ID, and time. This may be normal windows check ins/telemetry stuff. I don’t get the impression they are recording all URL’s the machine had visited, but I don’t know they’re not.

The websites have logs of users apparent IP, the URL they visited, and time.

The IP + time can be cross referenced to then correlate traffic with the Windows Device ID.

Going back to your far fetched claim… something would need to be logging a GUID from your Linux install and your current IP address (and your apparent IP address) and the time. That’s not happening. Furthermore, why the hell would a filesystem GUID be used for that purpose?!?

PS: Apparent IP refers to the IP that other hosts on the internet see as your source IP when you make outbound connections, as opposed to the IP address that is bound to your network adapter. IE: think NAT.

Internet privacy is a contradiction in terms.

By couchslug • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Internet privacy is a contradiction in terms.

Do nothing on the web you’d greatly mind the world knowing.
Trust nothing and no one to be other than self-serving.
Have the least practical info on every networked device. If it’s not airgapped it may as well be posted to 4chan.

Re:How is the ID accessed?

By Anonymous Cward • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
Every URL is sent to Microsoft with Optional/Full telemetry enabled when you don’t use InPrivate Browsing and that includes your GDID. You can observe this in the Diagnostic Data Viewer, and as it’s full URLs (not just domains) Microsoft knows every little search query too. Even if you scale back to security-only telemetry, Microsoft still receives full URLs (not just domains) not via diagnostic telemetry data but instead via Microsoft SmartScreen, and AFAIK that still includes a unique device identifier, with the legitimate reasoning being for their Intelligence Graph to identify malicious endpoints between sessions.

Likewise, all the telemetry related to the running of programs is queued and uploaded with Optional/Full even if no crashes occur, as well as diagnostic logs relating to software installs/updates, so Microsoft can see what devices have been running, when and for how long. All of that can be correlated once law enforcement is involved because they can subpoena third-parties to nab access logs which allow for the use of statistical analysis to reidentify the user.

All of this is legit, but the problem is that Microsoft abused our trust by violating their own Privacy Policy, since they claim not to identify people, but clearly did in this case.

Amazon Will Stop Accepting New Customers For Mechanical Turk

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from TechCrunch:
These may be the last days of Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. An announcement on the Mechanical Turk website says that on July 30, 2026, the crowdsourcing service will close to new customers. Amazon Web Services says the decision was made after “careful consideration,” adding, “Existing customers can continue to use the service as normal. AWS continues to invest in security and availability improvements for Mechanical Turk, but we do not plan to introduce new features.” In other words, Amazon isn’t completely pulling the plug, but the service is very much on life support.
Further reading: Horror Stories From Inside Amazon’s Mechanical Turk (2020)

LLM Replacement?

By Luthair • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
I wonder whether this indicates that people are replacing usage with LLMs. I don’t have direct experience with mechanical Turk, but i assume since it relies on humans paid almost nothing the output won’t be perfect thus is similar in quality to LLMs

Learning Another Language Appears To Slow Brain Aging By Up To 13 Years

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
A new study suggests multilingualism may slow brain aging, with bilingual people showing brains that appear about six years younger than monolingual speakers and people who speak four languages showing brains that appear up to 13 years younger. Researchers say earlier language learning and higher proficiency appear to strengthen the effect. The Guardian reports:
Our brains are made up of billions of nerve cells that communicate with one another. But as we get older, the connectivity in our brains often deteriorates, causing memory and speed of thought to decline. While previous research had observed that people from European countries with greater language proficiency tended to age more slowly, this study measured the impact of speaking languages on individual brains. Scientists in Spain, Chile, Argentina and Dublin compared people living in the Basque region — characterized by high levels of multilingualism — who spoke Spanish, Basque, French and/or English.

To measure neurological age, the scientists used magnetoencephalography to measure the brain activity of 728 people with varying ages and levels of linguistic ability. They then used AI to process the results to calculate a normal level of brain connectivity at any given age. A second unrelated group of 144 people were then scanned and compared, comprising equal numbers of people speaking one, two, three or four languages.

Dr Lucia Amoruso, from the Basque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language in San Sebastian, said: “In simple terms, people who spoke more languages tended to have brains that looked younger than expected for their chronological age. The effect was not only related to the number of languages spoken. Higher language proficiency and earlier acquisition of a second language were also associated with more delayed brain ageing. This suggests that multilingual experience matters as a gradient: it is not simply about being bilingual or not, but about the depth and duration of language experience.”

so which is the cause and which is the result?

By v1 • Score: 4, Informative Thread

it always annoys me to see announcements of a correlation being described as a cause-and-effect.

Whenever I see cause-and-effect stated without them being clearly distinguished, I always ask myself “could they have the cause and effect flipped around?”

Maybe people that have “younger brains” are much more likely to be in the group that has learned another language recently?”

That seems to be much more likely than the stated order, since people with more youthful minds would be more likely to be learning new languages than others with older, less-flexible minds?

Or stated another way, “younger minds encourage multi-lingual” rather than “multi-lingual encourages younger minds”.

Re:Learning another language is fun, too.

By ShanghaiBill • Score: 5, Funny Thread

I had an RPN calculator in high school, so that made learning Japanese much easier.

Re:ok

By CubicleZombie • Score: 4, Funny Thread

I took Pascal in high school and it satisfied my foreign language requirement. I still LOL at that, but it shows how much educators knew about computers back then.

Saw a similar article

By smooth wombat • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
BBC Science has an article where experts ranked 400 jobs by their dementia risk. Those least likely to die from Alzheimer’s were taxi drivers and ambulance drivers. The reason behind this seems to be that constant spatial and navigation processing tasks might offer some protection from Alzheimer’s.

The authors do have one caveat: While researchers found that taxi and ambulance drivers were less likely to die of Alzheimer’s, they were also more likely to die young.

That’s an issue because Alzheimer’s is a disease that becomes more likely the older you get. If people in those professions aren’t living long enough to get Alzheimer’s, that could explain some of the results.

“The paper isn’t an advert for becoming a taxi driver - unfortunately they’re dying earlier” Spiers says. “Importantly, however, the researchers reran their analysis correcting for age and still found a significant effect.”

It seems using your brain other than for existence might help stave off mental decline.

Re:Learning another language is fun, too.

By dbialac • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
I spent 5 years learning German. Complete waste of time. I spent a week in Germany. Everyone spoke English. I was in a small town at a roadside convenience store and went in. I asked, in German, if they had any apples. The woman first corrected my pronunciation and then said, in English, “We don’t sell apples.” I found that to be the case throughout a lot of northern Europe. Outside of Germany and Scotland, the reason is that when Hollywood releases a movie in these areas, it’s expensive to dub a movie in the native language. As a a result, they instead show the movie in English with subtitles in the native language. People pick up on English pretty quickly as a result. This is also part of why you can travel almost anywhere in the world and find somebody who speaks English, the other part being the British Empire. As for the Germans, after WWII, English became the language of business because of post-war occupation by 3 of the 4 powers. Finally, as for the Scottish, well, let’s just watch this video.

US Cyber Agency Is Using Anthropic’s Mythos To Audit Government Code

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
CISA is reportedly using Anthropic’s Mythos model to scan government code repositories for security vulnerabilities, with sources saying the audits have already found numerous bugs. Reuters reports:
The scanning is being done by CISA’s Attack Surface Evaluation team, according to one of the sources. The team is a group within CISA that conducts digital security assessments and hacking exercises across government. Two of the sources said the audits had already uncovered a large number of vulnerabilities but did not elaborate. Reuters could not establish exactly how much government code the team had gone through or the nature or severity of the bugs it discovered.

[…] The National Security Agency, the U.S. government’s powerful eavesdropping agency, has been using Mythos as far back as April despite the blacklist, Axios has reported. Late last month, the New York Times said that NSA analysts had been testing Mythos in classified settings and coming away impressed with its capabilities. But when Anthropic rolled out a public version of Mythos called Fable, which included what it described as cybersecurity safeguards, the White House suddenly demanded that it ban foreigners from running it. This triggered a global shutdown of the model that was lifted only last week.

Of course

By allo • Score: 3 Thread

Obviously it is a powerful tool (even when it is overhyped) and other than usual users, they can ensure the privacy of what they upload using an NSL. Anthropic won’t be that stupid to mess around with US agencies when Trump can just buy OpenAI services instead.

GitHub Thumbs Nose At Sony’s Controversial End to Physical Media With Its Introduction of Repo CDs

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
GitHub is offering a limited run of 1,000 CD-ROM copies of public repositories as a pro-physical-media jab at Sony’s plan to stop producing PlayStation game discs in 2028. Tom’s Hardware reports:
The coding and collaboration platform, owned by Microsoft, states that “In light of recent developments in physical media, GitHub is proud to announce that you can now obtain your public repo on CD-ROM.” Moreover, it appeals to the human side of computing, adding the emotive line “Keep it. Lend it to friends. Pass it on to your children.” It isn’t April 1st, so thankfully this is no joke. However, if you check out the above-linked GitHub Your Code, On a CD offer page, it quickly becomes clear this is a very limited in time/scope stunt.

“Order a burned CD of your own public GitHub repo. Yes, a real physical disc you can hold in your hands, no download required,” begins the spiel. But this is a very limited run of 1,000 discs, with applications required between July 2 and July 6 (inclusive). Limit one per person, with availability varying between country/region.

“Your code is physically yours, forever. Until you lose it, let’s be real,” says GitHub. At best, these CDs will be framed and put on a wall, some becoming collector’s items or eBay money spinners (discs like 0001 or 0888 would be good ones, if they are numbered). Also, many will be lost or eventually/accidentally discarded, as GitHub seems to know. So this ‘protest’ is arguably 1,000 doses of expensively shipped e-waste.

Cool, we’re ready for post EMP gaming

By drnb • Score: 3 Thread
“GitHub is offering a limited run of 1,000 CD-ROM copies of public repositories "

Cool, we’re ready for post EMP gaming

90s Microsoft

By HnT • Score: 3 Thread

How delusional and tone deaf do you have to be to think you can present yourself as the good guys, as if nobody remembers the FUD and destructive and much hated Microsoft of the 90s, and the horrible M$ of today, and the shallow husk they twisted GitHub into.

Offer now rescinded (per The Register)

By couchslug • Score: 3 Thread

https://www.theregister.com/de…

Research Universities Are Admitting Fewer PhDs, a Bad Sign For Science

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from the New York Times:
The number of students admitted to Ph.D. programs this fall dropped 15 percent from the previous year, according to data from over 50 top research universities, raising fears that the nation’s capacity to produce new science could be diminished. The decline is driven, in part, by a chaotic and unpredictable federal funding environment under the Trump administration, as federal cuts are promised and then reversed, and budgets remain unclear.

A reduction in doctoral students could mean fewer scholars at universities to teach and mentor undergraduates. Higher education leaders also worry that, if the declines continue, there will be fewer researchers to power a rapidly evolving scientific work force. The data showing the decrease comes from 55 universities, all of them members of the Association of American Universities, an invitation-only organization that includes 69 of the most prestigious research institutions in the United States. The data collection was conducted by another group, the Association of American Universities Data Exchange.

Schools in A.A.U. confer half of the nation’s research doctorates, according to the association. “We are at risk of losing a whole generation of new talent because of the reduction in the capacity to support those students,” said Toby Smith, a senior vice president at the A.A.U. University leaders and research advocates cite many reasons for the declines in new doctoral students. Key federal agencies, such as the National Institutes of Health and the National Science Foundation, have been funding fewer research grants. The wealthiest institutions also face a new federal tax on their endowments.

But the most cited reason in interviews was the unreliable nature of federal funding under the Trump administration. The administration proposed major cuts to federal research agencies last year, but Congress restored the funding. It is again proposing big cuts. While Congress may again reverse the administration’s proposed reductions, the uncertainty makes it hard for schools to make multiyear commitments to doctoral students. The administration also abruptly ended thousands of research grants last year, arguing that they did not align with the government’s priorities. The administration restored many of the grants after judges deemed the eliminations illegal and arbitrary, but research advocates say the whiplash was damaging.

Re:Trump cut the funding

By ArchieBunker • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Ever notice how the fuck your feelings crowd has the most fragile feelings of all?

The only winner....

By LazLong • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The only winner here is China.

Thank you Trump.

Re:Trump cut the funding

By smooth wombat • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Ever notice how the people on the left calling for Sharia law, would be the first to be thrown off of buildings if it were ever implemented?

Hey dumbass, it’s those Red states trying their best to implement Sharia law through forcing the Bible into the classroom (but no other religious texts), displaying the ten commandments in schools (which they ignore), telling women what they can wear, telling women they must have babies, and a whole host of other things they’re trying to force down people’s throats.

As always, every accusation is a confession with you people.

Re:Trump cut the funding

By ArchieBunker • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The Christian nationalists running the country have the same goals as Sharia law. Cross out Muhammad and scribble in god and it’s virtually unchanged.

Re:Trump cut the funding

By MachineShedFred • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Please point to anyone of consequence “calling for Sharia law.”

We’ll all wait patiently for your forthcoming evidence of your claim. You will not reply.

Small AI Models Gain Traction Around the World

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot
locater16 shares a report from IEEE Spectrum:
One morning in 2019, Adebayo Alonge was in a Cape Town hotel room, preparing to demonstrate his startup’s AI answer to a serious problem in African health care: counterfeit medication, which kills thousands of people across the continent every year. The RxScanner is a handheld spectrometer that scans a pill with infrared light, then sends the item’s molecular profile to an AI model equipped with a pharmaceutical database. In seconds, the AI identifies the medication from its molecular profile — or reports that it’s phony.

Pharmacies were using the system in more than a dozen countries, including Ghana, Kenya, Myanmar, and Alonge’s native Nigeria. But that morning in South Africa, it didn’t work. “I was shocked,” Alonge says… So Alonge immediately asked his engineers to shrink the AI model down to a smaller, low-power, unconnected version that could run entirely on his Android phone. They produced it 2 hours later, and that saved the demo. More importantly, the work birthed a new version of his device, which can authenticate a pill in places without broadband, computers, or even reliable electricity. It also turned Alonge into an advocate for this kind of “small AI.”
“The article goes on to detail other immediately useful ‘small’ AI applications without any subscription or billion dollar data centers needed,” writes locator16. For example, Bala Murugan and colleagues at Vellore Institute of Technology in India developed a drone-based system that photographs cashew plants and identifies disease-indicating splotches on the plants. The key advantage is that all processing happens on the drone itself, so farmers do not need a computer, broadband connection, or cloud server access.
In a Uruguayan vineyard, researchers developed small-AI systems to identify ant infestations. The article doesn’t go deep into the deployment details, but it presents this as another example of a narrow, localized model trained to recognize a specific agricultural threat. Small AI has also been used to detect the presence of malaria-carrying mosquitoes in multiple countries. This is especially useful in regions where public-health teams may lack reliable network access or expensive lab infrastructure, but still need fast, local detection.

In parts of Brazil without access to more complex medical equipment, researchers have used small AI to run electrocardiograms from an Arduino device. The article also describes Marcelo Jose Rovai’s work on a TinyML model that generates electrocardiograms in a patient simulator lab. Rovai also describes a newer experiment using an Arduino UNO Q with a Qualcomm chipset. The device runs a language model locally, collects sensor data, and analyzes it to detect tiny pools of water where mosquitoes might breed — while using only about 3 watts of power.

Re:Ok cool

By Anonymous Coward • Score: 5, Informative Thread

> But why does rxscanner need AI? It’s a scanner and a database lookup. The AI is redundant no?

from Gemini

Pattern Recognition: Unlike a standard database that only looks for exact matches, AI looks for patterns.

Tolerance Handling: The AI accounts for minor variations, such as humidity, pill age, or scanner angles.

Anomaly Detection: Machine learning algorithms instantly flag if active ingredients are missing, diluted, or replaced with toxic fillers.

Re:Ok cool

By niftydude • Score: 5, Informative Thread
The rxscanner is a very cheap portable spectrometer, so it is probably a near IR or short wave IR device with quite poor spectral resolution.

On top of that, there is a lot of clutter in those spectral bands, not to mention measurement problems caused by varying reflectivity and light levels between samples taken in the wild

So it isn’t as simple as taking a scan and comparing the spectra you measure to a database, there is a lot of noise.

Machine learning/AI models to help with this are quite common in this field, and have been around for decades to help with spectral library lookups - long before the current LLM hype phase.

Re:Farming

By drnb • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
At my university the school of agriculture was next to the school science. I used to use the ag computer lab since it was better than the science computer lab. I was polite, gave up my computer if the lab started to get full, so the ag students didn’t mind my being there. Plus I was flippin amazed at the stuff they were doing. They enjoyed explaining it and I had some experience with embedded stuff so I could help out at times. So it was a kind of win win. Good times. Eye opening.

Re:What is small AI?

By DaPhil • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Obviously a small model (fewer parameters). Come on, it’s not that hard to understand. They got Qwen down to 4b and it still works, so I am not surprised that it works for small application areas such as this.

Re:Ok cool

By Rei • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Also: “The results of drug sample scans are recorded and stored on the blockchain”, which isn’t something that affects the choice of AI models, but does make me immediately suspicious that this whole thing is a grift / scam.