Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Mozilla is Calling Out Microsoft for Forcing Edge on Users
  2. Anthropic Announces ‘Public Benefit Fund’, Committing 5% of Its Shares
  3. ‘Human Vs. Robot’ Cage Match Was Illegal, Says California
  4. New Video Game Law Proposed: ‘If You Pay For It, You Own It’
  5. Planned UK Data Center Delayed Until 2030s Over Power Grid Delays. Microsoft Pulls Out
  6. Researchers Discover How To Lead Dying Coral Reefs To a ‘Fast And Full Recovery’
  7. Websites Are Closing Their Doors to AI Agents
  8. More Details on Arrested Saudi OpenAI Employee, Who is Seeking Release on Bail
  9. LinkedIn Fights AI Slop, Now 40% of Its Long-Form Posts
  10. Programming Language Popularity Increases for R, Julia, and Rust (but Not Go)
  11. Releasing Palm OS Archive, Developer Rediscovers Working Virus After 25 Years
  12. FSF Criticizes Raspberry Pi DRM Blocking RAM Upgrades
  13. Tech Journalist Robert X Cringely Has Died
  14. Saudi OpenAI Employee’s Arrest Revives Fears US Tech Companies Are Hiring Spies
  15. Woman Arrested After Blocking Delivery Robot to Protest Job Displacements

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Mozilla is Calling Out Microsoft for Forcing Edge on Users

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
“Mozilla reps tell me they’ve met with Microsoft about their concerns,” reports PC Magazine, “but that the company wasn’t responsive.”
“They’ll do the minimum the law requires to respect user choice,” explains Kush Amlani, Mozilla’s counsel overseeing global competition and regulatory work… Mozilla recently marked 100 days since it released an 87-page report detailing the ways in which Microsoft pushes Edge on Windows PCs.... One example is how Windows often displays a “Let’s finish setting up your PC” pop-up after an OS update. This screen has an enabled-by-default option to “use recommended browser settings,” which makes Edge the default web browser.

However, that screen doesn’t appear in Europe. European laws now force Microsoft to make Windows more respectful of user choices. For instance, in European countries, the Start menu opens links in your default web browser rather than in Edge, as it does everywhere else. Amlani says Mozilla wants Microsoft to release the European version of Windows to the rest of the world. However, he thinks this will require government action. As he puts it, “Microsoft can do better when it’s forced.”
The last line of the article sums up Mozilla’s main point. “No one should have to fight their OS this hard on something as simple as a browser preference.”

Europe?

By thegarbz • • Score: 4, Informative • Thread

Yeah it does. I mean we have a lot of other things that are blocked in Europe but we very much do still get the “Finish setting up your PC” window during feature updates. Maybe they meant EU and maybe the windows is locale dependent? I do have mine set to English UK despite being in an EU country.

Is this news?

By commodore73 • • Score: 3 • Thread
I think this would only be news if Microsoft or some government entity were to do something about it. Otherwise, it just seems like the same old headline that’s been haunting us as long as Microsoft has existed - Microsoft abuses its users to harm competition. That being said, I actually thought edge was a decent browser, but that was years ago when I still used Windows. As a veteran .NET programmer that actually loved Microsoft Office, Windows 11 was just more abuse than I could take.

Anthropic Announces ‘Public Benefit Fund’, Committing 5% of Its Shares

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
“Anthropic says it’s committing 5% of its shares to a ‘public benefit fund’,” reports TechCrunch, “structured as a wholly-owned entity within the company — with the option to contribute an additional 2% for every 50% increase in Anthropic’s value.”

Important context from CNBC:
The timing of Anthropic’s public fund announcement is both mandatory to prepare for an initial public offering, and “beneficial from an image perspective,” especially as AI reshapes the jobs market, Lise Buyer, partner at IPO advisory firm Class V Group, told CNBC…

Anthropic said it will share more about the fund structure and governance in the coming months, including valuation milestones that may increase the stake. It said it will also share progress on the fund in an upcoming public benefit report. In response to Anthropic’s announcement, Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk said on X that he “recommend[s] giving the shares directly to the public.”
Anthropic’s announcement hints the fund could address job-market displacements. It says the fund “might” explore “large donations to traditional nonprofits” — or, that it “might” explore “direct distributions to specific populations. One example is labor market impacts.”

It then argues AI could “cause instability” for many workers. And while Anthropic has already committed $200 million for “studying and addressing” this issue, Sunday’s announcement says “bolder” approaches may be needed, and that the Fund “will have the versatility to pursue them.”

“Combined with its co-founders’ pledge to donate 80% of their equity and an employee donation matching program, roughly 20% of Anthropic’s shares will be dedicated to public purposes,” reports Reuters, “excluding any additional shares added later.”

We found a tax break!

By locater16 • • Score: 3 • Thread
And how to turn our tax break into a PR release!!

A Public Benefit Fund is a Slush Fund

By drnb • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
A Public Benefit Fund (PBF) is a Slush Fund that allows a company to spend money on stuff that does not enhance shareholder value. Its a legal technique to avoid doing what is profitable. Anthropic gets to define whatever the “public benefit” is, and divert shareholder money to it, and shareholders cannot do a damn thing about it. Its a way to fund pet projects of executives without any oversight.

Sure a PBC (Corporation) or PBF can actually do good, but despite the name it does not have to. “Good” is only in the eyes of those who created the PBF or PBC.

I’ve watched that shit for 20 years with MSFT

By T34L • • Score: 3 • Thread
Grew up in one of the many countries where Microsoft “paid for” so very much of school equipment, and all that amazing “free” gear cost the schools was curriculum conveniently teaching exclusively use of Microsoft OS and complete office suite. I’m looking towards the “public benefit fund” wholly dedicated to nurturing the public impression that all these elusive jobs are one free retraining making you a loyal Anthropic user away. I’ve eaten many a “free” lunch over the course of my life and, as a paying Anthropic customer, I’d not feed anything they hand out for the “public benefit” to my dog, or any other living being I’d care about the welfare of.

‘Human Vs. Robot’ Cage Match Was Illegal, Says California

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
“A human defeated two of the three robots he faced in a cage fight recently held in San Francisco,” reports the Los Angeles Times, noting that videos of the event drew more than 10 million views on YouTube.

But “the humans behind that fight could face a battle of their own — the legal type — if they want to hold another event like ‘Human Vs. Robot,’ the Sept. 18 competition that placed influencer Frankie LaPenna inside an octagon to battle three humanoid robots that were controlled remotely by a human operator in separate MMA-style fights…”
Wearing spiked gloves, a helmet and protective padding, the 5-foot-6, 205-pound LaPenna held his own against all three bots. He dominated his first opponent, referred to at the fight as "the child robot.” Next came an imposing "Terminator”-inspired humanoid, which was listed on the fight video as 6-feet and 200 pounds with a kick force of 850 pounds. The robot landed several hard kicks, including one that knocked LaPenna across the mat and another with an impact that brought the humanoid to the ground and caused its head to come off — but the human seemed to gain strength as the match went on and eventually stood triumphantly with his foot on the machine’s crumpled body.

LaPenna was dominant early in his final match, in which he faced a robot that resembled a “Predator” from the movies of the same name. After landing several punches and kicks and taking his opponent to the ground multiple times, LaPenna eventually became fatigued and called for the match to be ended. “He doesn’t get tired. He doesn’t stay down,” LaPenna said in a postmatch interview.
“The crowd of about 100 (humans, not humanoids) was thrilled,” writes the New York Times. (After beating his first robot opponent, LaPenna told his interviewer, “Clankers zero, humans one.”)

But the New York Times adds that “Those who know humanoid robots best highly recommend against fighting them.”
“It’s very unfair to put a human in with a heavily motorized system that’s only going to dominate,” said Ken Goldberg, a professor who oversees the automation lab at the University of California, Berkeley. “There’s nothing surprising about that....” He said he understood the appeal of the fights that Robot Entertainment Kombat (REK) was staging, noting that it tapped “into some of the fear and frustration with robots that people feel.... I mean, they love to see the human kick the robot’s gearbox,” he said. But the odds of that human fighter getting his gearbox kicked are much greater, Dr. Goldberg said, given that REK’s humanoid robots can weigh several hundred pounds and are made of steel.
To be fair, it looked like sometimes the robot just fell over. (And the robots were human-controlled, not programmed with split-second reactions…)

But “Not everyone is a fan,” adds the Los Angeles Times:
On Sept. 23, the California State Athletic Commission sent a cease-and-desist order to REK, its CEO Cix Liv and “all persons holding, promoting, advertising or sponsoring unsanctioned human versus humanoid robot cage fight.” The letter states that “any boxing or mixed martial arts contest, match, or exhibition, involving any human in the State of California” requires the prior approval of the commission and that it is a misdemeanor to hold such an event without obtaining a license or permit from the state. A spokesperson for the California Department of Consumer Affairs, which oversees the CSAC, said in a statement emailed to The Times that the commission is “committed to protecting the safety of the public and integrity of combat sports.”

“Unsanctioned activity puts the physical and financial well-being of all those involved at risk and such activity will not be tolerated,” the statement said.

Okay, but

By 93 Escort Wagon • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

How would he do against The Crushinator - or Destructo?

Re:Okay, but

By 93 Escort Wagon • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

More seriously… I decided to watch the video of the guy against that “Terminator” non-autonomous robot. Just about everything the guy did had ZERO effect on the robot. The robot’s attacks, on the other hand, were clearly dominant. But the robot fell over on its own, twice… and after the second fall the guy just walked over and declared “victory”. It was pretty bogus.

Not sure what’s meant to be demonstrated here

By Jeremi • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

It’s perfectly possible to build a machine that will incapacitate a human at close range; all of the world’s militaries have been doing it for years.

It’s also possible to deliberately dial down the machine’s combat effectiveness to the point where a fight against a human might not be a foregone conclusion.

OTOH, having done the latter, what have we learned? That we can design and build a robot that we nerfed just enough that it usually loses in hand-to-hand combat?

Cix Liv?

By algaeman • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread
Cix Liv is a number, not a name.

how to fight a machine

By OrangeTide • • Score: 3 • Thread

If you think you can take on a forklift in hand to hand combat, think again. I recommend swimming or climbing a tree to get away. We humans can defeat the machines, but only on our own terms.

New Video Game Law Proposed: ‘If You Pay For It, You Own It’

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
“When you pay for a game, you should own it,” says U.S. Representative Ritchie Torres (D-NY), introducing a new bill to fight the practice of “a rental disguised as a sale”.

Kotaku reports:
The fifth best-selling game of 2024 in the U.S. was NBA 2K25. Every year, fans dump hundreds of hours and hundreds of dollars into the grindy NBA basketball sim. But just a little over two years after its release, 2K Games confirmed it’s already pulling the plug on it. The game will be delisted from digital storefronts on October 30. By January 1, 2027, online servers will go offline as well, making it impossible to play the most popular modes. A game millions paid $70 for will become mostly useless. Democratic Congressman Ritchie Torres wants to change that.

“I think there should be a simple rule: if you pay for it, you own it,” Torres told Kotaku in a phone interview this week. To make that the law of the land, the U.S. representative for New York’s 15th congressional district since 2021 plans to introduce legislation in Congress called the Power To The Players Act. The bill would direct the Federal Trade Commission to create regulations protecting ownership rights for video games. Companies selling digital games would need to grant players more than just a license that can expire at any time, and games with online features would need to provide offline modes that still work even when servers eventually shut down…

The Power To The Players Act noticeably leaves out other types of digital media like movies and music, though Terminator 2 and a bunch of other movie purchases were ripped from people’s digital libraries earlier this year.
Representative Torres “did not confirm if the bill will have any cosponsors,” the article acknowledges, “or whether any of his Republican colleagues will sign on to support it.”

But players will see the bill’s importance next month, the article points out, “when Grand Theft Auto 6 releases as just a download code in a box, giving fans no control over a purchase that starts at $80.

Change to a monthly service

By gurps_npc • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

I expect a lot of these game companies to change to a system where:

1) You pay for a yearly contract to play ANY of their games.

2) Despite them having only one or two games that people want to play, in addition to 8+ crappy games that no reasonable person would pay to play.

This allows them to screw over people in a manner similar to what they do now.

Re:“if you pay for it, you own it”

By Rei • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

In Europe, it is. Article 6 of the Software Directive grants an “interoperability exemption”. The lawful licensee of software has the statutory right to strip DRM in order to achieve interoperability. Any EULA terms that prohibit reverse engineering for interoperability are automatically treated as void. Article 5(1) of Directive 2009/24/EC also grants the ability to decompile to fix bugs that impair the ability to use the software, even if the supplier prohibits it. So long as you don’t then start sharing your “offline mode” version of the software, you’re within your rights

People in Europe are within their rights to task an AI to decompile and tweak a game they own make an “offline mode” version of it, or to create their own servers or whatnot if the manufacturer plans to shut them down or otherwise strip features that the user paid for.

Of course, the US is less consumer-friendly in this regard.

Re:“if you pay for it, you own it”

By Rei • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

BTW, this also applies to old games. Have an old game that no longer runs on modern operating systems? In Europe, you have the right to task an AI to fix it so it will run.

Adding *new features*, mind you, is trickier. You’re not allowed to decompile and alter a program to add new features, but you *are* allowed to decompile for interoperability purposes. So you are within your rights to task an AI to decompile a program to figure out how to link a mod into it and then to write a mod.

It must suck to wake up everyday and be so wrong

By rsilvergun • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread
You could just Google this.

So yes initially the Clinton administration wanted back doors in encryption software. After a lot of backlash and several science researchers explaining to the administration rather calmly that it would never work the administration didn’t about face and stop supporting and calling for the back doors.

This is more or less how it’s supposed to work. Administrative types suggest something, science types take a look, science types either find that it’s a good idea or it’s a bad idea. Administrative types listen to the science types and that’s that.

This is exactly what happened with the Clinton administration. They came up with a stupid fucking idea which to be fair they should have known was stupid in the first place but they are administrative types not science types. The science types explain to the administrative types why it was a terrible idea. And in this case the administrative types being Democrats listened to the science types.

Meanwhile the entire Republican party is telling you that vaccines cause autism and miscarriages. I especially like the miscarriage one because Joe Rogan went around pushing it to morons and the statistic being thrown about was vaccinated women had an 80% miscarriage rate, which was true as long as you ignored the fact that it was in the first trimester and only counted pregnancies to finished in that. Of time and yeah no fucking shit completed pregnancies in the first trimester often miscarry…

The Republican party does not listen when scientists speak. The Democrat party does. If you give a shit about encryption or vaccines or science or reality you vote blue.

Now it’s possible you’re innocent in all this and not just taking pot shots at Clinton because he’s not on your team. If that’s the case you need to stop and ask who told you that Bill Clinton opposed encryption because whoever told that to you was lying in the exact same way that the people telling you that vaccines cause miscarriage 80% of the time. And you need to start getting angry at the people who are lying to you. Because it’s not the Democrats.

On the other hand if you’re just taking pot shots because he’s not on your team that will backfire on you eventually when the Republicans collapse the economy yet again. But you’re probably going to double down because you’re in too deep… So maybe someday you’ll get tired of being lied to. Good luck

Re:“if you pay for it, you own it”

By tlhIngan • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

Why did this Mr. Torres (Democrat from NY — That part is important) leave this out? Is it because the film industry is all democrat and the tech industry is libertarian? Can’t be.

Or maybe because it isn’t needed? Movies and music are available in a format you own.

For music - they’re basically all DRM free so you buy it you own it. You can also buy it on CD, vinyl, cassette tape or other formats.

For movies, well, you can still buy DVDs and Blu-Rays, and you buy those you own them.

For videogames, other than GoG, that doesn’t exist. You buy PC games with the courtesy from Valve/Steam, Epic, Microsoft, Sony, etc. If they say you aren’t allowed to play the game anymore, they can block you from playing it.

But with my CDs, purchased music, DVDs and Blu-Rays, no one can prevent me from watching it.

Planned UK Data Center Delayed Until 2030s Over Power Grid Delays. Microsoft Pulls Out

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
July: Nvidia-backed Nscale is building a £2bn data centre at Loughton in Essex, with Microsoft signed up as its anchor tenant. But it can’t get the electricity to switch on, reported The Next Web:
Nscale’s problem is not really Nscale’s. It is Britain’s. Grid-connection times have become the single biggest brake on new data centres. Some UK projects face waits stretching close to a decade for enough power. One estimate found more than a quarter of data-centre capacity slipped in 2025 alone.
“The data centre was due to receive its power supply at the end of the year,” reports the BBC. “But as first reported by the Telegraph on Sunday, Nscale has been told this will not happen until the 2030s.” (Though Nscale and Microsoft are still working together on other projects in Norway, Portugal and America.)

But now anchor-tenant Microsoft has pulled out of the Essex deal, reports the Telegraph, adding that Microsoft’s move “leaves the site in apparent limbo. The company was its only announced customer, having agreed to rent 23,000 Nvidia AI chips at the facility…”
Microsoft’s decision threatens to undermine Nscale’s attempts to push ahead with a Wall Street flotation worth up to $35bn (£26bn), despite a brutal sell-off in AI computing stocks. Rival data centre developers have seen their share prices plunge over the last week on concerns that they will struggle to repay their debts as interest rates and inflation continue to rise.... Tech analyst Gartner said last week that $3.5 trillion could be written off by 2030 if the AI boom fails to deliver on its promises.
And “our research indicates that enterprise and consumer AI revenue will be insufficient to support profitable returns on all planned AI capital expenditures during this period,” Gartner wrote:
“In 2026, AI providers are expected to spend nearly $1 trillion on AI infrastructure, and are forecast to invest an additional $6 trillion between 2027 and 2030,” said Will Sommer, Sr Director Analyst at Gartner.... Failure to achieve sustainable return on investment capital (ROIC) on rapidly depreciating assets would almost certainly necessitate write-downs. Based on Gartner projections, a continued AI infrastructure investment trajectory could leave more than $4 trillion in asset value exposed to write-down risk through 2032. In this scenario, Gartner does not expect the 12% ROIC to be achieved until the end of 2032 at earliest…

Gartner estimates AI-optimized IaaS spending will grow from $66 billion in 2027 to $174 billion in 2030. “The growth in spending on AI-optimized IaaS will be too low for most AI compute providers to recover their AI investments before the current generation of AI semiconductors is replaced,” said Sommer. By 2030, Gartner predicts that cost pressure and a lack of a differentiating business model will force over 80% of neocloud [AI-specialized infrastructure] providers to cease independent operations.

Re:Good

By JoshuaZ • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

Sooner or later people are going to realize that AI is just another name for Linear Algebra and all this will come crashing down

There are at least four problems with this. First, linear algebra is from a math standpoint insanely powerful. For example, all of representation theory https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Representation_theory is using linear algebra to understand groups. Much of the study of modular forms https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modular_form involves understanding the behavior of modular forms over SL_2(Z) which has heavy linear algebra elements to it. People who see linear algebra as somehow a weak thing are often people who took a single semester of it and didn’t do much else with it.

Second, the idea that these AI systems are just linear algebra isn’t accurate anyhow. While there’s a lot of linear involved, a major part of how transforms like LLMs work is the intervening non-linear layers, which use ReLu https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rectified_linear_unit, Softplus, or a similar function. So, summarizing this as just linear algebra isn’t accurate. It is linear algebra with some spice.

Third, even if this were somehow just linear algebra, that shouldn’t therefore be a reason to think that there’s any limits to what is going on. At the end of the day, the empirical success is what matter, and systems which can do things like prove the quasi-Riemann Hypothesis or solve other major math problems are pretty impressive regardless of what is under the hood. So, if one does think this is just linear algebra, that’s not a reason to dismiss the systems but a reason to increase your estimate of what can be done with mere linear algebra.

Fourth, slowing down connections like this may make crashes *less likely.* In particular, the main way we could have a serious bubble here is over-investment. Delays including power grid delays force bottlenecks on the investment level, and make that sort of problem less likely.

We may be in a bubble here. Certainly some elements look very bubble-like. In the late 1990s, during the dot-com boom, one had people making perfectly normal businesses but just tacking on “on the internet” to it and it would get millions of dollars of funding automatically. See for example pets.com . And we’re seeing some of that now; we’ve had a whole bunch of businesses see their stock price shootup just because they mention AI. So we may be in a bubble, and it may crash now, or might crash never or decades from now. (Arguably the US had an 80 year automobile bubble that didn’t crash until the late 2000s which then forced the auto bailout.) But the other thing to keep in mind is that a crash does not mean the tech goes away. In 1873, the US had a devastating collapse of the railroad bubble, and yet railroads continued to grow, with the amount of track not peaking until around 1910 https://transportgeography.org/contents/chapter5/rail-transportation-pipelines/rail-track-mileage-united-states/. Similarly, although the internet bubble burst, by 2015, one had more internet use than even the most internet hyping person in 1998 would have likely dreamed of. A bubble bursting does not mean the tech itself goes away.

Researchers Discover How To Lead Dying Coral Reefs To a ‘Fast And Full Recovery’

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Gizmodo reports:
Roughly 84.4% of the world’s coral reefs suffered bleaching-levels of heat stress during the last major marine heat wave from January 2023 to September 2025, with over half already lost compared to coral coverage in the 1950s… But there’s some good news, thanks to a new study published this Wednesday in the journal Science Advances: Marine ecologists at Stanford have discovered that bleached corals can be revived via contact with a healthy coral neighbor, who (like a good neighbor) shares their photosynthetic, symbiotic algae (Symbiodiniaceae) with their peers.

“This incredible new result — that fast and full recovery is possible in bleached coral — can inspire solutions that eventually may be scalable,” [Fiorenza Micheli, a marine ecologist with Stanford’s Center for Ocean Solutions and study co-author, told the journal Nature]… Unlike their controls, bleached coral in contact with healthy coral recovered in just eight weeks… [T]he surprise discovery of this method alongside the other techniques that marine conservationists are now actively pursuing — including the successful deep-freezing and revival of at-risk coral sampled from Hawaii — could offer threatened reefs the lifeline they need. Coral contact could super-charge other efforts, like the selective breeding of heat-tolerant corals and the cultivation of protected coral nurseries

Rear guard action?

By Ocker3 • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
Is this more than a rear guard action considering how common mass bleaching events are? How more coral can we re-grow between bleachings?

Websites Are Closing Their Doors to AI Agents

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
The Verge reports:
OpenAI, Meta, Google, Instinct, and others promise their agents can scour the internet on your behalf, doing anything from booking a dinner reservation and cleaning out your inbox to buying new shoes. But what happens when the rest of the internet won’t play nice?

In recent weeks, users of services like Meta’s Muse, xAI’s Grok, OpenAI’s Dots, and Instinct have reported blocks preventing their AI agents from performing tasks across top websites. Yelp told TechCrunch that it only allows AI agents that pay for its data licensing program, while Delta Air Lines is preventing them from booking tickets on behalf of users. JPMorgan Chase and Charles Schwab have also confirmed that they’re blocking AI agents from accessing accounts due to security concerns. Some users say sites that previously worked with their AI agent are no longer accessible, including Cars.com and Amtrak, suggesting other companies could be quietly blocking them....

Muse, Meta’s deceptively cute AI assistant, most recently faced the wrath of Amazon, which said its “continued access” violates its site policies. There are reports of xAI’s Grok, Instinct’s AI agent, and OpenAI’s Dots being unable to use Amazon as well. xAI owner Elon Musk responded by saying that maybe he “should start a competitor to Amazon.” The more places bots struggle to access, the greater the questions about how useful they are....

Instead of trying to fight Amazon, [Meta] has partnered with retailers like Walmart, Gap, Sephora, Best Buy, and others, allowing Muse to shop on their sites. At the same time, Shopify has also opened its network of storefronts to AI agents.

Re:Long-term, how can they stop them?

By PPH • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

If you are willing to give an agent your credentials,

Give? Remember when you said “OK” to Copilot getting access to your desktop, browser tabs, etc? Or maybe didn’t click “Hell no!” fast enough?

We got your credentials right here, buddy.

Re:If there’s one thing we’ve learned

By Brain-Fu • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

To be fair, websites don’t respect people’s rights to say “no” to user tracking and serving up ads, trying their darndest to defeat ad blockers and such.

Boo effing hoo

By Morpeth • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

This kind of automation ultimately causes problems for ‘regular’ every day consumers and gets hijacked by a smaller group of assholes; plus the technology isn’t mature enough to be trusted. So what happens when an agent runs amok, buys a too many of x, and the user says ‘wait! I didn’t want 100, I want to you to eat the cost of me returning it, and company y says, too fucking bad you bought it’ — who’s liable? (my answer is the dumbass with the agent, but who knows how it will pan out)

Only a few years ago some of the kind of stuffs agents do (or at least have access to) we’d call a virus or malware, how things change.

LOL. Sure. Go ahead, Musk.

By SeaFox • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

xAI owner Elon Musk responded by saying that maybe he “should start a competitor to Amazon.”

Classic Musk: Underestimating the talent and effort needed to break into a business. It took Amazon nine years to become profitable. At the most his attempt will just be “MAGA Temu” and he’ll hide the folly by merging it into a business that is working, like he’s already done with other properties he owns.

Traffic is traffic

By rsilvergun • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
A lot of the bots are indistinguishable from real users and if you have investors or advertisers on your platform the last thing you want to do is Chase those bots off. What you want to do is maintain just a little bit of plausible deniability.

Simply put online advertising doesn’t work and the only way to get the engagement numbers needed to make it even look like it might work is with a constant stream of rage bait and outrage porn. Basically any platform by design has to enshitify.

I think YouTube just barely avoids the worst of it. If you pay attention to YouTube you’ll find that you can actually curate your feed. So for example a while back I got tired of all the right wing douche nozzles and dipshit lefties trying to monetize my political rage so I started eliminating them. YouTube got the message. Reddit simply does not give you the ability to do that and while I have more or less stopped using it except for a few highly curated forums it’s still blasting my feed with worthless political shit.

Don’t get me wrong I’m political as fuck and I am all in on useful politics. I have a couple of channels on YouTube I still subscribe to mostly just Belle of the ranch. Channels that provide actual useful information that I can act on.

But after the 2024 election I figured out that 90% or even 95% of the content out there for politics is either right-wing propaganda or left-wing anti-centrist rage bait.

So I started asking myself why everything is so fucking useless and figured out pretty quickly that the internet runs on outrage and cat videos and these days it’s mostly outrage. What the cool kids called Doom scrolling.

So because of that you need the bots. If nothing else they are good at keeping the rage going and like I said they look like real users to your advertisers and investors.

As for why they’re getting rid of them now it’s probably a combination of the overwhelming hit to bandwidth that they just can’t keep up with combined with the fact that they have probably figured out how to filter the AI bots but allow the rage bots to continue to operate

More Details on Arrested Saudi OpenAI Employee, Who is Seeking Release on Bail

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
More details are emerging about Saudi OpenAI employee Abdulrahman Alfozan, who was arrested by the FBI for allegedly planting a recording device in an executive conference room. Previously Alfozan “was an engineer at Meta,” notes the New York Times, “before joining a start-up that went through Y Combinator, the Silicon Valley start-up accelerator. He gained permanent residency status in the United States in 2020, according to court documents, and was hired by OpenAI in July 2025.”

14 months later the conference room recording device was inserted in a USB port on the back of a television, and then concealed in toilet paper, according to a statement from America’s Justice Department. (There’s even a photo of a device — and a photo of Alfozan entering the executive conference room and appearing to look behind the television where the device was inserted.) The FBI’s says a chatbot account associated with Alfozan’s spouse showed prompts asking about installing and obfuscating a recording device. And the complaint alleges that OpenAI security personnel also found a bag Alfozan left in a different room which contained his wallet, his ID, and another recording device.

Discussions in that room included “highly confidential technical, commercial, and strategic information, including proprietary research,” according to the FBI, “as well as nonpublic information about Open AI’s technical progress and strategic decisions…”

“If convicted, Alfozan faces a maximum penalty of 5 years in prison and a $250,000 fine, followed by 3 years of supervised release.”

Friday Alfozan’s lawyersrequested his release from custody, saying Alfozan agrees to wear an ankle monitor, remain at home, surrender his passport and “not possess any covert audio or video recording or surveillance device.” They argue that the one-way ticket he’d purchased to Saudi Arabia just continues a long-standing habit of buying one-way tickets over the years for air travel, since his tech career often involves last-minute changes to meeting schedules, and “70% of the airline bookings in his email since January 2021 (96 of 138) were one-way tickets.”

His lawyers also presented 46 letters of support, including letters from former Meta colleagues, ten company founders and chief executives, and more than a dozen engineers and engineering managers.

Dumbest spy ever

By marcle • • Score: 3 • Thread

Conceals (poorly) a recording device, then leaves a similar device lying around in a bag with his wallet and ID? It’s so blatantly incompetent that it makes me wonder if this isn’t some red herring in a larger plot.

LinkedIn Fights AI Slop, Now 40% of Its Long-Form Posts

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
“Even LinkedIn is getting tired of your AI-written posts,” writes CNN, reporting that the Microsoft-owned, job-oriented social media site “is upping its fight against slop.”
A report published in July by Pangram, a research firm that tracks AI content online, found that more than 40% of long-form posts on the platform were AI-generated, compared to around 30% on X and Medium and a smaller percentage on Reddit and Substack.... LinkedIn previously offered AI tools to edit or rewrite posts, although it recently scaled the offerings back. But low-quality AI posts are a business problem for LinkedIn. They all start to sound the same, [according to LinkedIn Editor-in-Chief Dan Roth Roth]. If users see too many generic AI posts, instead of content that really teaches them something or gives them a deeper understanding of a professional connection, LinkedIn risks losing them to other platforms.

In August, LinkedIn rolled out a button letting users flag when a post “seems like AI slop,” which was clicked more than 1 million times within its first two weeks. Now, the company is trying to use its own AI systems to help weed out AI slop on the platform and to remind LinkedIn users how to post like humans. The company built a team largely made up of former journalists and social media experts who have an eye for recognizing generic, sloppy content. These experts help train LinkedIn’s AI model on what authentic, useful posts look like. If the model flags a post as low-quality, AI-generated content, it’ll be less likely to be distributed beyond that user’s direct connections.

Also key to the strategy is a creator management team that acts as “content therapists” for executives, subject matter experts and other LinkedIn users, many of whom have gotten accustomed to the convenience of using AI to write what, on the surface, appear to be polished posts, Roth said. “A lot of times now today, they’ll run it through Claude or Gemini or wherever, they’ll post it on LinkedIn and it will perform poorly. And then they come to the team and they’re like, ‘Why did this do badly?’" Roth said. “And the best thing you can do is give it back to them and be like, ‘Did you enjoy reading this? Do you see yourself in this?”

The efforts are showing early signs of success. Improvements to LinkedIn’s detection systems have resulted in a 40% decline in views of content classified as AI slop, the platform said last month. That’s not to say LinkedIn is entirely opposed to AI, Roth said, adding that “not everyone is a born communicator.” But failing to edit or personalize content means it’s less likely to reach a wide audience on the platform.

Nobody actually reads LinkedIn posts

By rsilvergun • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread
Especially anything long form. And they know it and they could care less about the quality of it. What they’re upset about is that if their platform becomes completely full of AI slop they won’t be able to monetize the posts by selling them as training data.

This is the place where it’s actually fitting

By dmomo • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

People writing content for content’s sake. People trying to be “thought leaders” without doing the thought part. Nobody reads that stuff anyway, they just like it in a big old networking circle jerk.

Re:Nobody actually reads LinkedIn posts

By Anonymous Brave Guy • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread

I stopped using LinkedIn when they seemingly decided my account wasn’t about me (despite having obvious and publicly verifiable details right there in the description) and wanted me to verify my ID using one of the US-based services with a questionable reputation to get my access back. That’s not going to happen, so I just don’t use the site any longer.

As far as I can tell, that has made zero difference to my career, and it’s one fewer drain on my time. The only thing I have missed is seeing the occasional good news story where a past colleague has been promoted or the like, but I’m not giving up my government-issued credentials to the US-based data harvesting industry for that.

Goofy stuff

By methano • • Score: 3 • Thread
I’ve noticed a lot of highly informative posts from chemists (?) about various chemistry subjects. They almost look like useful synopses. Unless you happen to know the field. Then you realize they’re complete garbage. It’s becoming clearer and clearer that AI is going to have a hard time deciphering the scientific literature.

Hol up..

By Vegan Cyclist • • Score: 3 • Thread

Wait, so major AI player upset AI is used on their platform?

Seriously?

Are they even listening to themselves? Not that consistency matters in this timeline anymore..

Programming Language Popularity Increases for R, Julia, and Rust (but Not Go)

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
TechRepublic reports:
The TIOBE Index is a monthly indicator of programming-language popularity based on factors including skilled engineers, courses, and third-party vendors. The October 2026 rankings show a largely stable top 10, with R overtaking SQL and Julia returning to the top 20 for the first time in three years. [SQL has risen to #9 from #10 in October of 2025 — back when R ranked only #13.]

Python remains No. 1, followed by C, C++, Java, C#, and JavaScript, while Rust holds its No. 10 position. [A year ago Rust ranked only #16.] Outside the top 10, Julia climbs from No. 21 to No. 18, and TIOBE introduces Mandarin Chinese search terms into its methodology to broaden the index’s geographic representation.
Dropping out of the top ten is Go, which fell from #8 in October of 2025 to #11. And Delphi/Object Pascal has plummeted from #9 to #19.

TIOBE CEO Paul Jansen argues that Julia’s growing popularity “is largely driven by the demand for modern programming languages that combine high performance with ease of learning, particularly for numerical computing.”
Python offers an accessible, high-level approach to numerical computing, but performance can become a bottleneck. C++, on the other hand, delivers excellent performance but comes with a steeper learning curve and a lower level of abstraction. Julia aims to bridge this gap by combining the best of both worlds…

Apart from Julia, two other languages are knocking on the door of the TIOBE top 20: Dart and OCaml. Dart jumps from #41 to #27 this month. Thanks to its popular UI toolkit Flutter, Dart has been hovering around the edge of the top 20 for quite some time. OCaml, on the other hand, might come as a surprise. It jumps from #38 to #26 this month, driven in part by its growing use in real-time trading systems and parsing technology.

Rust good match for AI code generation

By caseih • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

With more and more software development being turned over to AI coding agents, in many respects the language itself no longer matters. However I’m not surprised Rust is growing in popularity, driven by AI code generation. And it’s a good match for that. While a lot of human developers find Rust difficult to learn and work with, AI agents have no such difficulties and the Rust compiler guarantees help mitigate some of the problems from mediocre, generated code.

I’ve seen quite a few projects introduced lately that all use AI code generation and Rust. And frankly that’s probably the only way I’m going to use Rust myself.

TIOBE is measuring a world that no longer exists

By Guillermito • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

TIOBE is based on counts of web search hits using the query "[language name] programming”.

This methodology (that was questionable even when humans turned to web content created by other humans to seek help about programming languages) is now absolutely useless when humans use AI coding agents for programming.

The interactions that used to appear publicly in sites like Stack Overflow (new monthly questions posted down 98% from its peak) now belong in private chats between developers and their AIs, out of reach from web search indexers and thus invisible to TIOBE.

What TIOBE sees is mostly the fossilized landscape of two years ago. The rest is noise.

Re: TIOBE is measuring a world that no longer exis

By k2dk • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

Fair point.

Go still sucks though.

Dart!

By TechyImmigrant • • Score: 3 • Thread

I don’t know how to code in Dart, but I’ve put a lot of sloppy dart code on github recently.

That’s because while I’ve been coding for decades, I hate coding GUI libraries and I’ve not done much GUI as a result. The libraries are constantly changing and what you learned last year is out of date and you have to learn the next fashion statement library.

But AIs don’t hate GUI code, so I’ve been making a bunch of GUI programs I wouldn’t otherwise make.

Flutter is a quite good cross platform GUI library and you program it in Dart and the programs compile to MacOs, IOS, Android, Windows, Linux and Web. This works better than any other cross platform system I’ve used over the years. The on-ramp is short because Claude knows how to code for it.

So a load of command line and TUI programs of mine have sprouted out into full GUIs coded by AI. GUI programming seems to be mostly boilerplate and functions with tens of parameters, which AI is quite capable at.

The making core crypto and analysis algorithms that are my day to day thing is for now the domain of humans. AI has never seen it before and so it doesn’t know how to do it.

Releasing Palm OS Archive, Developer Rediscovers Working Virus After 25 Years

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Long-time Slashdot reader ardiri remembers his days writing applications for the Palm OS. And he’s now released approximately 1.5 GB of historical Palm OS development resources, “accumulated during the early days of handheld computing and preserved on hard drive backups for more than 25 years… to preserve the tools and knowledge that helped define an important era of personal computing.”
The collection includes historical SDKs, developer conference presentations, technical documentation, programming examples, limited source code, and development utilities. (ROM images, commercial applications, and simulator binaries have deliberately been excluded....) Making a broader collection of development resources available to the retrocomputing community, the archive is available at GitHub.com/ardiri/dev-palmos and is intended for historical preservation, education, and research, particularly as enthusiasts continue working to maintain, emulate, and revive the platform… Ardiri has also written an auto-biography and has started explored the engineering principles behind these systems in his books.
And somewhere along the way, Ardiri rediscovered the original source code for "The Palm OS Virus That Never Was — Lost for 25 Years, Found in 2026.” Lurking on a CompactFlash card containing files dated June 2001, he found the self-replicating Palm OS virus that he’d developed and tested in June 2001, months before the planned PalmSource developer conference in San Jose.
Named ‘Virii,’ the virus intercepted Palm OS system calls to progressively infect legitimate applications while preserving their original functionality. Infected applications could then spread between handheld devices through infrared beaming, potentially allowing an infection to propagate among hundreds of developers exchanging software at the conference. The virus also included a date-triggered payload designed to interfere with system time reporting between October 23 and 27, 2001, potentially causing erratic clocks, unreliable alarms, and missed appointments.
He promises the functional source code and binaries will remain private.

FSF Criticizes Raspberry Pi DRM Blocking RAM Upgrades

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
The Free Software Foundation “has never supported Raspberry Pi,” writes their deputy directory Sean O’Brien, “as it depends on nonfree software for the boot process, leaving an important part of the computer outside the user’s control.”

But they’re now decrying “an even more intrusive restriction on user freedom” — the binary-blob bootloader changes that limit your ability to upgrade RAM:
The restriction is not new: the relevant checks were introduced in the device firmware around 2024. However, these hardware handcuffs have only recently received wider attention. Though a user can desolder the original memory and install electrically compatible RAM, the nonfree firmware may refuse to recognize the additional memory, or simply decide not to boot the computer at all. Even replacement RAM of the same capacity can be rejected.

This is worse than Raspberry Pi’s longstanding dependence on nonfree firmware in an important way. It is not only nonfree software, but it is Digital Restrictions Management (DRM), used in this case to prevent the owner of the computer from making a modification that the hardware is otherwise capable of supporting. That distinction matters. Soldered RAM is difficult for most people to replace since it is a physical characteristic of the hardware. In the case of Raspberry Pi boards, users have demonstrated that the hardware itself can be modified successfully....

Raspberry Pi justifies the use of DRM on the basis of being able to identify altered computers. There may be legitimate reasons for wanting to identify such altered computers. Unscrupulous sellers have reportedly replaced memory on lower-capacity boards and resold them as more expensive models, sometimes using unreliable or defective components. But preventing fraud and maintaining quality does not require taking control away from users. A Raspberry Pi could record its original factory configuration in a cryptographically verifiable form. Raspberry Pi could use free software that warns the user when the installed RAM differs from original factory configuration. Raspberry Pi could provide tools allowing buyers to verify what hardware originally shipped with a board. None of those measures requires a software-enforced limit on what an owner may do with the computer…

If compatible hardware can be installed successfully, the manufacturer should not create restrictions to prevent the owner from using it. Restrictions on hardware upgrades are deeply troubling from an organization like Raspberry Pi that has stated their commitment to longevity as a guiding principle. Free software is ultimately about who controls the computer. The user should control it, not the manufacturer that sold it....

The people who own these computers must also have the freedom to modify, repair, and upgrade them, without restrictions imposed by nonfree software limiting their potential.
Hackaday recently argued the restriction was "no big deal.” noting there’s ways to bypass the restriction”
The bootloader is stored in the SPI flash chip, which can be reflashed using the built-in mask ROM over USB and rpiboot, and you are not prevented from flashing older versions of the bootloader, so far… If you have the skills to upgrade your RAM, you most certainly have the skills to downgrade the Raspberry Pi bootloader…

My advice: don’t lament Raspberry Pi RAM upgrades, especially given they’re only slightly harder to perform now. Very few hackers ever performed them, the main audience for them turned out to be dodgy hardware resellers online… Think of the users that will no longer be fooled by a shady seller on Amazon, especially now that the perverse incentives for board mods and reusing harvested RAM chips are at their highest.

The arguments from the apologists are so dumb…

By Anonymous Coward • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

> especially given they’re only slightly harder to perform now.

  > Think of the users that will no longer be fooled by a shady seller on Amazon

these are incompatible claims. Either ram upgrades are still easy to accomplish -OR- ‘dodgy hardware resellers’ will no longer be able to continue installing bad ram. You cannot have both.

Now, of course, raspberry pi *cloud* actually close of that avenue, but they’d have to lock down the bootloader to do so. That’s probably their next step. I imagine the apologists at Hackaday would find a way to rationalize that too.

But in fact…

By Budenny • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Not sure I see the point of the pi any more. For roughly the same price you can now buy a used NUC with a faster processor, enough memory, and SSD storage. Why mess around running stuff from usb sticks? Or even from external extra SSDs? Put the distro of choice on it. And isn’t the memory expandable too on the NUC and similar?

Re:But in fact…

By drinkypoo • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

raspi or similar still makes sense if power consumption is a significant consideration. If you are running from battery you will want to look at ARM. If space is a serious consideration, likewise, like if it absolutely has to be very small. For all other types of install you’re definitely better off with a used NUC. If you want some GPIO you can get it with a $3 nano.

Re:But in fact…

By ArchieBunker • • Score: 4, Informative • Thread

How many gpio pins does a NUC have available? How about schematics?

Re:The very bad thing about Raspberry

By 93 Escort Wagon • • Score: 4, Funny • Thread

American keyboards have an “A” key, while Canadian keyboards have an “Eh” key?

Tech Journalist Robert X Cringely Has Died

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
BoingBoing reports:
Mark Stephens, better known under the pen name Robert X. Cringely, died last week at 73. Stephens chronicled the tech industry of the late 1980s and early 1990s — the age of Bill Gates’ rise, Steve Jobs’ repose, the dawn of the world wide web — and produced the famed documetary Triumph of the Nerds, based on his own bestselling Accidental Empires: How the Boys of Silicon Valley Make Their Millions, Battle Foreign Competition, and Still Can’t Get a Date.

Though not the first InfoWorld columnist to write under the Cringely name, he was responsible for its persona and fought successfully to keep it after he left the magazine in 1995.
“I loved the man,” writes Darth Technoid (Slashdot reader #83,199):
I first met him in the 1990s, while he was still working at InfoWorld, and we became friends immediately. He helped me get a job or two, and he was always filled with crazy (meaning really good) ideas.

I’ll miss him and his creativity greatly.
Cringely answered questions from Slashdot’s readers in 2000. And Cringely led an interesting life, as you can tell from Slashdot’s January, 2020 story Robert Cringely Attempts an Air-Launching Space Startup:
“How does a 67-year-old hack with three minor children recover from going blind, losing his home and business in a horrible fire (like 2,000 others, we are still fighting with insurance companies), while appeasing an angry crowd of Kickstarter supporters armed with pitchforks and shovels?”

That crowd still wants long-time tech pundit Robert X. Cringely to deliver on his Kickstarter-funded project to create custom Minecraft servers. So in a new blog post this week, Cringely writes that “I went looking for venture money to recapitalize MineServer and I simultaneously started a satellite launch company to fund my eventual retirement. I am not making this up…”

He’s now found a Beverly Hills patron who wants to be a co-investor in the Minecraft servers, but “I will have to earn the matching money on my own, which is what I have been trying to do with my other startup, Eldorado Space.”
Slashdot has often linked to Cringely’s commentary over the years, as far back as 1998 and as recently as this summer. ("Tech Pundit Cringely Co-Founds Startup ‘2Brains Inc’ to Solve LLM Hallucinations.”)

But my favorite Cringely memory is Steve Jobs: The Lost Interview, the full 70-minute interview from 1995 that a 40-year-old Jobs gave to Cringely during filming for Triumph of the Nerds. (“And they actually sent someone to wake up the Pope....”) There’s various pirated copies on YouTube and an online transcript, but only 10 minutes made the broadcast — at the time Jobs was still at NeXT after his departure from Apple. But when Cringely rediscovered the videotape, the entirety of the interview was released to theaters in 2012 six months after Steve Jobs’ death.

Share your own memories of Robert Cringely in the comments…


My all-time favorite article of his, from 2004

By SpzToid • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

My all-time favorite article of Mr Cringely, from 2004, "How Mom, Pop, and Linux will take down SBC, Verizon, and the rest" …which is why my evolved personal infrastructure now involves OpenWRT.

He is already very much missed.

My CORRECTED link to his 2004 article, post-coffee

By SpzToid • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

My CORRECTED link to his original article, from 2004.

https://web.archive.org/web/20…

Re:My CORRECTED link to his 2004 article, post-cof

By martin-boundary • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
Both Cringely but also Jerry Pournelle (Chaos Manor) were inspirations for those of us who used to spend Saturday mornings reading tech magazines and dreaming of what the future would bring. Infectious writing that made you want to tinker with PCs all day, then read science fiction all night.

Re:My CORRECTED link to his 2004 article, post-cof

By Registered Coward v2 • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
I meet Jerry at a computer show I was covering. I saw him in the press room, introduced myself, said I really like his style and said I copied it for my column. He looked at me and said steal, only amateurs copy, we professionals steal. Had an interesting conversation. Great guy who will be missed.

Represented an entire era

By vistic • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

My memory is that I had joined Apple the first time right after Jobs stepped down as CEO, when he remained as Chairman… right before he passed away. Then the Steve Jobs interview was released and I saw it at the Aquarius Theater in Stanford and Cringely was there in person at the showing. Stylish as ever.

To me he represented a whole era of computing, when it was exciting me, before I had really started making a living with computers yet. Back when I really did learn a lot by reading physical magazines.

Saudi OpenAI Employee’s Arrest Revives Fears US Tech Companies Are Hiring Spies

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
That Saudi national working at OpenAI and arrested by the FBI “has not been charged with foreign espionage,” writes the Washington Post, “and the U.S. government has not said whether he was acting alone or as an agent of a foreign government.”

But “there are signs that the U.S. government is exploring the latter possibility,” they add, citing comments from Chris McGuire, a member of the National Security Council during the Biden administration:
The Department of Justice’s press release about the incident says that the National Security Division’s Counterintelligence and Export Control section, whose responsibility includes prosecuting spies, is assisting with the case… A Washington-based Middle East expert, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to avoid incurring wrath from Saudi Arabia, said he believed the Saudi government was almost certainly involved in some way. “No one does this, not even for patriotism, without getting paid,” said the person. And money would not be distributed without agreement by the Saudi royal court, he said. The Saudis lag behind their regional rival, the United Arab Emirates, in artificial intelligence development, he added.
Friday America’s Director of National Intelligence told CNBC that espionage, “both commercial espionage, and I would say state-sponsored espionage, are realities. It’s something that our private sector companies need to be wary of.” (And CNBC adds that"An ex-CIA official, who asked not to be named because they were discussing information that is not public, told CNBC this week that the case is ‘probably the tip of the iceberg.’")

The suspect had recently said he helped advise government agencies in Saudi Arabia on technology, reports the New York Times:
In an Arabic podcast interview last month, Abdulrahman Alfozan, 35, a Saudi national, said he and other Saudi tech professionals in Silicon Valley had formed a group that advised Saudi organizations, including the kingdom’s social insurance agency…

“Silicon Valley is ground zero for espionage from a variety of countries around the world,” said Amy Zegart, a professor at Stanford University who specializes in national security and intelligence. She added that she was “troubled” by the OpenAI incident and expected more cases “because these companies are so important.”
The Washington Post says the arrest "has ignited a fierce debate about the potential risks of Silicon Valley’s international workforce — employees who often hail from nations seeking to rival the AI superpower status of the U.S.”
Foreign nationals have long formed the backbone of the American tech industry, helping U.S. companies surpass their would-be international rivals… As recently as April, Katrina Mulligan, a senior member of OpenAI’s national security team, called for an “accelerated pathway to citizenship” for such workers, referring to foreign hires as a “national strategic asset” at an event on Capitol Hill. She estimated that a significant number of OpenAI’s employees were not U.S. citizens, including Chinese nationals. Just half of the 300 top AI researchers in the world, she said, were American.

Other industry leaders — as well as some lawmakers — have long accused top-tier tech companies with many foreign workers of disadvantaging Americans and being breeding grounds for Chinese espionage. Palmer Luckey, CEO of weapons maker Anduril, and venture capitalist Shaun Maguire of Sequoia Capital took to X on Wednesday to revisit arguments that the industry should focus on hiring U.S. citizens. “Silicon Valley has operated with maximum openness and maximum naivete toward foreign tradecraft,” Maguire wrote… At OpenAI on Wednesday, employees continued tense conversations about the political implications of the arrest for immigrant workers, two OpenAI employees said, speaking on the condition of anonymity to describe internal discussions… The arrest triggered a discussion on OpenAI’s internal Slack messaging platform among employees about whether the incident might increase pressure from the Trump administration on OpenAI to not hire foreign nationals, said one of the people.

In March, Emil Michael, the Pentagon’s chief technology officer, wrote in court papers that AI developer Anthropic’s reliance on staff with ties to China was among the concerns that fueled the Defense Department’s conflict with the AI company.

Hey now

By ArchieBunker • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

The Saudi government pays good money to stay on the friends list. https://www.bbc.com/news/world…

The age of no intellectual property

By BitterEpic • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Do you read Sutter Cane? OpenApi has a ton of duplicity in its behavior. It removed its non profit status. It has tried to steal secrets from Apple. It steals secrets though peeking on the chats of Mathematician and software companies.

We are entering the age of no one having IP. By the current definition when you are generating your code using a chatbot, you don’t have the rights to it. Yet people seem to be blindly doing and pretending like they have some kind of copyright on it. Furthermore, they perpetrate this stealing of work against their peers. Why would it be surprising for OpenAI to be sending people to send spys. OpenAI owns your stuff chumps.

Intellectual Property is dead.

By BitterEpic • • Score: 3 • Thread

Is there anyone here that actually trusts OpenAI with secrets? I am not really sure why this is a story as OpenAI is a clearly shady company. OpenAI converted to a for-profit after many promises never to. They stole work from others. There are clues they are eaves dropping in chats for software companies and mathmatitions among other incidents such as with Apple.

I keep reading about people here who talk about how AI outputs code that isn’t too bad. Does anyone here actually expect that you have any control over your IP that you have fed through a chatbot? Regardless if you are paying or not? In this era where everyone is being told that AI can’t do copyright infrigement?

Do you read Sutter Cane?

Woman Arrested After Blocking Delivery Robot to Protest Job Displacements

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot
A Philadelphia newscast reports on a grey-haired lady who allegedly refused to move out of the path of a delivery robot as a form of protest because “I know they’re taking the jobs of human delivery workers.”

She was arrested, but says her actions were protected speech:
According to police, Marvin repeatedly blocked the robot’s path and ignored multiple commands from officers to move… Marvin said she was protesting the use of delivery robots because she believes they are replacing human workers.... “I have been protesting them whenever I saw them by standing in front of them and preventing them from going forward,” Marvin said…

Marvin said she has confronted delivery robots on multiple occasions… Ashley Baldwin of West Philadelphia said she witnessed one of those encounters. “I actually thought the robot hit her, so my original question was, ‘Are you OK? Did the robot hit you?’ And she said, ‘No, I have to stop this. They’re taking over the world,’" Baldwin said.

Asked whether she plans to continue protesting the robots, Marvin said she does.
She was charged with disorderly conduct.

Uber did not respond to their request for a comment.

Re:Good start

By Kernel Kurtz • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
Close enough.

Re:I’ll play Keyboard Lawyer…

By Bahbus • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

No, it’s pretty simple. Both are legally permitted to use the sidewalks. Neither are legally permitted to block the other from continuing to their destination. If the robot were a human, it would have been illegal detainment. She’s lucky she got something basically meaningless by comparison, but she definitely deserved to be arrested.

Re:Precedent

By Bahbus • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

I’m not sure blocking the robot is even illegal in a public place

At least in this instance, it is. Under PA state law, personal delivery robots (like the one in the article) are legally classified as pedestrians with all the same legal rights as a human pedestrian. Both are allowed to be there on the sidewalk. Neither are allowed to prevent the other from reaching their destinations. If a human does that to another human it would be illegal detainment.

That’s a serious crime

By OrangeTide • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

Interfering with commerce is one of the worst crimes you can commit in this country.

(1877 B&O Railroad strike, 1886 Bay View Massacre, the Ludlow massacre, Bloody Friday of 1934, …)

Re: Good start

By thegarbz • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

No Sharia Law for the West.

I don’t know. Telling women what they can’t do with their own bodies while writing “In God We Trust” on the money certainly sounds like the Christian equivalent of Sharia Law.