Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Copper’s Surprising Melting Behavior Provides Insights for Future Fusion Power Plant Design
  2. X Open Sources Its Ranking and Filtering Algorithms
  3. Why Europe Keeps Being Pummeled by Heat Waves
  4. How Swarming Jellyfish Overran Three French Nuclear Power Reactors
  5. How Larry Ellison Dropped From World’s 2nd-Richest To No. 8 In Just 2 Months
  6. AI Fails to Deliver a 4-Day Work Week - Especially at AI Companies
  7. It’s Not Just RAM: Windows Licenses Are Also Pushing Up PC Prices
  8. Europe’s Record Heatwave Kills 25,000, Dries Rivers, Shuts Nuclear Plant, Exposes Submerged Warships
  9. Why Are Big Tech CEOs Writing Long Manifestos About AI?
  10. Vulnerability Giving Attackers Full Control of Macs Is Under Active Exploitation
  11. Astronomers Discover a New Kind of Cosmic Object: a Black Hole ‘Star’
  12. Meta Patents AI Glasses to Use Facial Recognition to Identify People, Make Highlight Reels of Your Dinner Party
  13. Robots That Walk and Talk Are Coming To Car Factories
  14. Ex-Cambridge Professor At Center of Plagiarism Row Found Dead
  15. Flock Announces Changes Amid Backlash Over Its License Plate Reader Network

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Copper’s Surprising Melting Behavior Provides Insights for Future Fusion Power Plant Design

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Phys.org reports:
Future fusion power plants aim to recreate the heart of a star here on Earth to power our future energy needs. While the core fusion plasma will burn at hundreds of millions of degrees, the surrounding structural components must handle sudden, punishing heat loads that rival the extreme temperatures faced by spacecraft upon reentry into Earth’s atmosphere. Copper and its alloys are primary candidates for handling these intense heat fluctuations, making it vital to understand exactly how the metal behaves when pushed to its melting point.

Now, researchers at the Department of Energy’s SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory and collaborators have captured a detailed, step-by-step look at copper atoms as they underwent extreme heating. Published in Nature Communications, the results revealed a key parameter that allowed copper’s crystal lattice to melt steadily rather than collapse instantaneously, as earlier simulations predicted. “These results greatly improve the simulations we use to predict which materials have the best shot at surviving the extreme conditions of future fusion reaction chambers,” said Mianzhen Mo, a SLAC staff scientist who led the research. “They also demonstrate the incredible, atomic-scale resolution imaging we can achieve at SLAC’s electron camera....”

Researchers use computer simulations, aided by AI and machine learning, to sift through innumerable combinations of elements and identify promising candidate materials for real-world testing.
“Whether the copper melts slowly or suddenly collapses, by the time the researchers look, the sample resembles nothing more than a metallic brown puddle,” the article points out. But SLAC’s powerful electron camera captures atomic and molecular movements down to the femtosecond — a millionth of a billionth of a second — and revealed that at around 1,424 degreesC (2,595 degreesF) there was still gradual melting as the temperature rose beyond the superheating limit, with real-world conditions showing the atoms shifted and retained some order.

“It’s a straightforward solution,” said Mianzhen Mo, a SLAC staff scientist who led the research. “But molecular dynamics simulations had been overlooking it for years. When you have complex simulations attempting to capture every aspect of reality, down to individual atoms, it takes real-world data to show you what’s missing from the calculations.”

X Open Sources Its Ranking and Filtering Algorithms

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader shared this report from TechCrunch:
X is significantly expanding its open source codebase, which includes the app’s “For You” algorithm and its core ranking engine, and adding a feature that will let users see if their account or posts have been impacted by any of its ranking systems, the social network said on Thursday. The company is making the source code for the “For You” timeline, the default feed you see when you open the app, available on GitHub under the Apache v2 license. It’s also expanding its previous efforts to open source parts of its codebase to add more detail, including the model configuration, filter, and core ranking system details. That means it includes the parameters used to weight different signals — key to understanding which posts are actually displayed. This also makes the codebase roughly 10 to 15 times larger than it was before.

“You’ll get the core ranking code that pulls posts and ranks them for any given user and assembles the feed,” X’s VP of Product Keith Coleman told TechCrunch in an interview ahead of the announcement. “You can see the systems that filter out potentially problematic, rule-violating content…And some of those systems, like the ranker and the score, you can even run yourself outside the company.”

“This is the kind of thing that I think people will be fairly shocked that we are releasing,” he added.

In addition to the repository, X is providing tools that will let users see for themselves if and how X’s ranking systems have impacted their account or posts. A new transparency tool is rolling out to an “Under the Hood” page in the app’s settings, which will let users who have posted 10 or more times over the past month download their aggregate stats as a JSON file. The file will show if any labels have been applied to their account or posts over the past calendar month.
X’s VP of Product told TechCrunch that X engineers will consider pull requests. “That would be amazing to have people submitting code that improves the algorithm…I mean, how cool would it be for the X algorithm to be not just visible to the public, but also, like, by the public?”

What’s the point if you can’t actually change it?

By T34L • Score: 3 Thread

The one thing that defines utility of a social media platform is the userbase. Literally nothing else matters if you don’t have the users. That means that forking it is, unlike most open source software, a complete non-starter. You can’t just decide you don’t like the algo and that you’ll modify it and use a different one; if Twitter doesn’t expose the actual users and their content to whatever selection you wish to make from it, showing the alleged code to the selection algo is worthless.

It’s some form of cool to expose how exactly the sausage is made, except, given the people involved, I’d not trust them to actually give you the complete real deal and there’s no way whatsoever to validate that the code they release is really it.

I’ve used twitter for years and gathered a “following” way larger than I’ve had on any other platform since, but these days I’d rather scream my musings into the wind (or perhaps even less meaningfully; post them here on Slashdot) than post on a platform ultimately fully under control of the whims of one of the dumbest manchildren of his generation.

Re:What’s the point if you can’t actually change i

By AlanObject • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

They said they would consider pull requests.

And if they didn’t, I think a greater level of transparency is worthwhile in its own right.

Why Europe Keeps Being Pummeled by Heat Waves

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Europe is facing its fifth round of dangerously high temperatures this summer, the New York Times reports. Now climate scientists wonder if global warming is doing more than raise temperatures…
The weather patterns that create heat domes aren’t new, but today they arise on top of the warming caused by greenhouse gas emissions. That makes it more likely that heat waves reach record-shattering temperatures for long stretches. But other environmental changes — natural, human-influenced or both — might also be causing heat domes to become more frequent and longer lasting. And it’s these changes that scientists around the globe are trying to puzzle out.

One change has to do with the Arctic. The differences in temperature between the hot Equator and the frigid far north help keep weather moving around the Northern Hemisphere. But with the top of the world now warming at several times the pace of the rest of the globe, those temperature gradients are narrowing. That might be causing the movements of weather systems to become more sluggish, producing more persistent heat waves. In Europe, reduced air pollution could be having a similar effect. Industrial emissions can contain particles called aerosols that reflect sunlight. Curbing aerosols has improved air quality, but it may also have altered the way air moves across the continent.

Scientists haven’t come to firm conclusions about how these shifts might be affecting European summers, said Antje Weisheimer, a climate scientist at the University of Oxford. The complex, fine-scale interactions in the atmosphere that drive weather dynamics are tough to capture in computer simulations, Dr. Weisheimer said. “It’s tricky,” she said. “We’re making small progress.”

Dim Coumou, a professor of climate science at the Dutch university VU Amsterdam, sees artificial intelligence as one way forward. In a recent study, he and his colleagues used an A.I. algorithm to help a weather model better predict summer temperatures in Europe. They not only improved the model’s forecasts; they also discovered why some of the model’s predictions had been off: It misrepresented the way conditions in the western Pacific Ocean influenced atmospheric patterns that eventually made their way to Europe. With A.I., “we can also learn what the climate models are missing,” Dr. Coumou said.

Yeah…

By zurkeyon • Score: 4, Funny Thread
We are terraforming the planet for Lizard people. Don’t ya know? ;-D

Re:Europe? What about North America?

By PPH • Score: 4 Thread

We caught a guy who was setting fires over here. In large part due to video surveillance.

More Flock cameras is the answer.

variability of a stable system is persistent

By FeelGood314 • Score: 3 Thread
Any complex system with variability will see the average values of its members rise and fall but if you take the standard deviation of the set you will see it is much more constant than the average. IQs have steadily gone up with better healthcare but the deviation in IQ has barely changed. The variability of a stock is fairly persist even as the price rises or falls. We have always had the occasional record high, low, most rain etc. However if you look at the variability of the weather, for instance in Southern Ontario Canada, 50 years ago, the chance that it would rain on Saturday used to be almost completely independent on whether it had rained the previous Wednesday (3 days earlier). 30 years ago their was a strong correlation. The average temperature didn’t change, the average precipitation didn’t change but the variability of the weather made a huge change. The change in variability indicates a significant change in how the system works.

The people of Europe are learning what the farmers on Southern Ontario learned 30 years ago. Even if the average doesn’t change the weather has significantly changed. Average temperature is a terrible measure for climate change. It might be easy to explain but it lags the real change by 30 years.

How Swarming Jellyfish Overran Three French Nuclear Power Reactors

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
A “massive influx” of jellyfish forced Electricite de France SA to shut three units at its Gravelines nuclear power plant this week and reduce output at a fourth, reports Bloomberg. Just as summer temperatures surged, 3.2 gigawatts went offline — and the power utility was already facing cuts other nuclear sites as high temperatures reduced the river water available for cooling.

More details from ScienceAlert:
As Politico reports, the Gravelines nuclear power plant spent hundreds of thousands of euros in 2025 to stop this happening again, only to see a repeat 12 months later… Increasing temperatures in the water can produce more of the plankton and animals that jellyfish feed on, as well as accelerating life cycles and extending breeding seasons....

It’s not just jellyfish that have a habit of disrupting human energy infrastructure. Last year in Connecticut, a single raccoon caused more than a thousand power outages, as reported by CT Insider. It’s not clear exactly what the raccoon did, but we do know it somehow got into a substation and caused damage to the equipment in there. The unwitting act of sabotage left more than 2,500 customers in the area without power at one stage — though repairs were swiftly carried out.
Reuters reported Tuesday on how the French utility responded to their jellyfish swarm:
EDF has installed fixed cameras at the intake canals and on the filter drum screens to detect any incoming blockages as soon as possible, an engineer told Reuters… The company has also partnered with a French fishing organisation and a sea rescue organisation, which monitor for swarms and can raise an alert to launch targeted trawling operations by fishermen to reduce the swarm’s density before it reaches the plant, the engineer said. The fishing boats were deployed [last] Saturday after an initial alarm was raised, limiting the impact from the swarm. The jellyfish that are already on site are being removed with vacuum trucks, he said. No new jellyfish are arriving, so cleanup is finishing, which should lead to a quick restart of the units, they added…

Scientists warn such events could become more common due to factors including global warming, the arrival of invasive species, habitat loss of predators and over-fishing.
Thanks to Slashdot reader Bruce66423 for sharing the news.

How Larry Ellison Dropped From World’s 2nd-Richest To No. 8 In Just 2 Months

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Less than a year ago he was the #1 richest man in the world. 10 weeks ago he was #2. But yesterday Larry Ellison dropped to #8, Forbes reports, falling behind Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang.

Ellison’s net worth is now estimated at just $192.6 billion — after a $104 billion decline:
Shares of Oracle plunged roughly 54% between hitting a high of just over $250 on June 1 to a low of $114.50 on July 28, though the stock rebounded slightly to $150.52 as of Friday.

A decline followed Oracle telling investors it expected to raise $40 billion through debt and equity financing, with capital expenditures surging 162% to $55.7 billion and spending expected to top $95 billion by fiscal 2027. Jacob Bourne, an analyst at eMarketer, told Reuters there are broader concerns about how Oracle would fund its capital spending to match its revenue projections, and Bank of America analysts separately flagged in a note cautioning that more than 50% of Oracle’s remaining performance obligation comes from OpenAI. Melius Research analysts wrote last month that Oracle’s spending plans may not hold if OpenAI or Anthropic demands more computing capacity. S&P Global also downgraded Oracle’s credit rating in July, arguing the firm’s “rapidly expanding” AI infrastructure business could pay off, but may be too expensive and could weaken Oracle’s financial position in the meantime.

$443 billion. That’s how much Oracle’s market valuation has dropped since peaking at $877.1 billion in September, hitting $433.5 billion as of Friday… Oracle, once viewed as a potential winner of the booming AI infrastructure buildout, has since raised concerns among investors who appear to view the firm as taking on too much financial risk to fund its projects. Wall Street has cautioned that mega-cap tech firms may be taking on too much spending to match growing demand for AI products, with firms like Amazon expecting to spend more than $200 billion. Oracle’s backlog has exploded to $638 billion, but more than half is reportedly associated with OpenAI, and some analysts have cautioned that most of those funds may not be guaranteed.

Poor Larry

By Registered Coward v2 • Score: 4, Funny Thread
He’ll have to cut back on, well, nothing.

Re:Cui bono?

By dfghjk • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

It’s not money, it never existed so it didn’t have to disappear.

Other considerations?

By fahrbot-bot • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Maybe just having the most money isn’t his Paramount concern …

Re:Proprietary software is obsolete

By CommunityMember • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Anything that isn’t already open source can have an AI replacement coded in hours now. Oracle’s business model no longer works in 2026 and Ellison should cash out before it’s too late.

Various PostgreSQL variants (with additions) is already quite close to Oracle DB, but many enterprises want to be running a DB certified for their (for example) ERP solutions, and have been willing to pay (Oracle) for that extra paperwork. Sort of like no one likes VMWare, no one likes Oracle, but the cost to get out is higher than what many enterprises are prepared to spend today for a future reduction in costs.

Good News!

By mistergrumpy • Score: 3 Thread
So it looks like his position in the lst is doubling every month (from 2nd to 8th in 2 months). That means in just 33 months he’ll be the poorest person on earth!

AI Fails to Deliver a 4-Day Work Week - Especially at AI Companies

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“An engineering director at Google said four years ago that AI would deliver a four-day work week by 2025,” remembers the BBC. And earlier this year OpenAI “formally urged companies to start testing out a four-day work week (with no change in pay), claiming that AI will soon be able to speed up so much human labour that the corporate world should prepare itself.”
However, a former OpenAI technical employee who left the company last year told the BBC the firm never actually trialled the four-day work week it suggested others should try while they were there. Instead, the person described what was often a gruelling work culture marked by frequent “crisis meetings”, working on weekends, and “super cut-throat” performance reviews that would see colleagues suddenly let go… [T]he former OpenAI employee said they would put in at least 70 hours a week, much more than they did in previous tech jobs…

Other companies have also pushed the idea that AI will effectively reduce the number of hours people need to work, for better or worse. [At OpenAI and Anthropic] sprints can stretch on for many weeks and top 90 hours of work in a seven-day period, tech workers that the BBC spoke to for this story said… At Meta, workers said they have been abruptly pushed onto teams this year doing AI work being treated as urgent… The hours on such teams at Meta are often long, with staff working into the night, on weekends, and feeling they are “on call” during the hours they are not working, according to descriptions of the work from the current and former employees…

Some new research suggests that AI tools are making people’s workloads even more burdensome. A study out of UC Berkeley followed hundreds of workers at a US tech company for eight months as they used AI. It found the employees “worked at a faster pace, took on a broader scope of tasks, and extended work into more hours of the day”… The UC Berkeley research found that the workload of tech employees was expanded in part because of the need to constantly check the output of AI tools.
In the article Neil Thompson, an innovation scholar at MIT, pointed out a problem with estimates that AI will ease the workload on humans. “People assume that 20% less work means four-day weeks. But new work emerges.”

The BBC also points out helpfully that “there are no limits in the U.S. on how many hours a person over the age of 16 can work.” (While in the UK and Europe, “laws limit a working week to 48 hours, including overtime.”)

Thanks to long-time Slashdot reader hadleyburg for sharing the article.

Who could have seen that coming?

By irreverentdiscourse • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Anyone who actually believes AI will cause people to work less hours is a complete fuckin moron.

The literal developers of AI should know better.

illogical

By fluffernutter • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
The 4 day work week is a logical fallacy. At what point do companies decide to give regular employees more pay for less work? At a time when they don’t really need as many employees. That’s never going to happen. They have never felt any obligation to share the rewards of productivity.

EU’s working time directive

By hwstar • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

The Working Time Directive was instituted in the 1980’s. Margret Thatcher was very upset that the UK had to follow this directive to remain in the EU.

The Working Time Directive limits weekly working time to an average of 48 hours per week over and 17 week reference period. Companies sometimes get exemptions from key employees, but there can’t be no coercion to sign such an agreement. The exemptions are usually for key employees.

Since the UK left the EU, there has been no substantial changes to the regulation. Instead, the original domestic legislation implementing it—the UK’s Working Time Regulations—was converted into UK law to maintain legal continuity, and core worker protections regarding maximum working hours and paid holiday remain active

In contrast to the United States, there is no limit on working time, and the only option the employee has is to quit (Employment-at-will). There are also 2 distinct classes of workers. Those which are non-exempt get overtime pay after 40 hours of work in a week, while those which are “exempt” only get their base salary regardless of how many hours they have to work. There is a dividing line which lists certain job requirements as those falling under exempt, and those which are non-exempt. Managers,Engineers, Accountants, and a lot of indirect labor positions are usually exempt.

With so many people in the USA living paycheck to paycheck, quitting due to excessive overtime is very unlikely

lower work week is a red herring

By oumuamua • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
John Maynard Keynes predicted that his grandkids would work just 15 hours a week. How was he so naïve? Here is what always happens if work starts getting done faster: The employees think “hey we can leave early or take friday off”. The boss thinks “Well shit, I can cut headcount, everyone will work a bit harder but I’ll boost profits this quarter”

Re:Who could have seen that coming?

By thegarbz • Score: 4, Funny Thread

I don’t know about that. My office has been pushing AI like crazy and that’s been demotivating enough that I’ve definitely worked less.

It’s Not Just RAM: Windows Licenses Are Also Pushing Up PC Prices

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
It’s not just RAM prices that are going up, writes CNET. “Reports suggest the cost of Windows licenses for manufacturers is rising by up to 10%.”
Several sites that closely follow Microsoft news, including Windows Central and Windows Latest, have published articles citing a report from Taiwan’s Economic Daily News that claims some PC manufacturers are seeing a 7% to 10% increase in the cost of Windows 11 licenses…

Because they buy licenses in bulk, they get a sizeable discount over what a consumer would pay for a new copy of Windows 11. But given the existing cost pressures from other components, a big Windows 11 price hike could lead them to pass on some of the added cost to PC buyers. According to the EDN story, PC makers could raise prices by about 5% over the next quarter due to the reported Windows price hike. .. A translated version of the Economic Daily News article contains information from an unnamed PC brand executive. It says that while Microsoft typically raises licensing costs every year by single-digit percentages, that hike has reached 7% to 10% this year, a significant increase.
“A representative for Microsoft declined to comment on the report,” according to the article.

But it also notes that three weeks ago laptop maker Framework blamed price hikes and reconfigurations for some of their models on processor, memory, storage, “and other silicon costs — but also “an increase in Windows license costs.”

Thanks to Slashdot reader joshuark for sharing the article.

Oh no

By jhoegl • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Our forced AI roll out abusing our Monopoly is not working to generate money, wont somebody please think of Microslop?

Most people don’t need Windows

By Valgrus Thunderaxe • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
They should wipe the drive and install Mint, and take MS up on their promise for a refund, as stated in their license agreement between them and the purchaser.

Big Picture Costs.

By geekmux • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Have you ever tried to get a Windows refund? Virtually impossible. The problem with the PC price going up is that the OEM bundles it, so unless you’re on eBay and there’s a windows/no-windows competitive marketplace you’re going to have to suck up the OEM pricing.

It appears that Microsoft normally increases the license cost every year. I’m guessing this particular increase will amount to a 1-2% impact in the big picture, since most consumers don’t go home with only an OS license and no hardware.

No. I’m not justifying Microsofts increased greed. Just questioning the clickbait hype around manufactured MSRP ‘panic’.

Meanwhile, RAM prices could increase by 1-2% by the end of this fucking sentence. Because a cat can play Beethoven reggae better than you ever could, and you had no idea how bad you needed cats playing Beethoven reggae.

Europe’s Record Heatwave Kills 25,000, Dries Rivers, Shuts Nuclear Plant, Exposes Submerged Warships

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“The European Union’s Copernicus climate monitoring service confirmed Monday that June and July were the hottest on record in western Europe,” .according to a report from the CBC. “The period saw an estimated 25,000 heat-related deaths.”

CNN has before-and-after photos of Europe’s dried rivers, calling it “a crisis so dire it can be seen from space”
River levels are so low that commercial ships have had to reduce their loads by as much as 80% to avoid running aground. It’s disrupting supply chains and making shipping more expensive.
Other effects of Europe’s drying rivers

Yeah, pretty much this.

By Qbertino • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Disclaimer: European here.

4th epic heatwave this year in Germany right now. I’m currently in Karlsruhe and it’s 37 degrees Celsius outside (too lazy to convert to bananas or whatever you guys use). Got an SUV rental and it’s AC couldn’t keep up this noon. Concrete on the Autobahn cracked open in the last heatwave and they had to close down to repair it. Right now NRW is seeing it’s largest forest fire since ever.

I was up north on the island of Fehmarn at the start of the week. Summer was bearable there although I did get sunburn. Anything south of Bremen though has unbearable heat at noon. Not fun. The Rhine is at an all time low, you can almost wade through it ( this has never happened ) and Hungary is having an energy crisis because they had to shut down both of their fission plants because the didn’t have enough cooling water. France is closing in an the same problem once again too.

Climate change is hitting us like a fist this year. Not fun.

Re:What crisis?

By PPH • Score: 4 Thread

Approximately 50 million human lives are prematurely ended each year due to abortion.

So sad. Particularly since this can be easily prevented with birth control.Safe, legal and rare.

It was Clinton that said abortion should be “Safe, legal and rare.”

Re: Yeah, pretty much this.

By Viol8 • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Germany is on the same latitude as as newfoundland idiot. 37C is NOT normal.

Re:The Ice Age ended, finally

By XXongo • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
Indeed, the ice age ended finally… about 7000 years ago.

And the entirety of human history has risen during the inter-glacial. We’ve built a civilization well adapted to the climate as it currently is.

So, why would we went to change it?

Re: What crisis?

By LazLong • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Those aren’t “human lives” any more than the semen produced by all you incels when you masturbate to videos of violence against women.

Pussy coward won’t log in to post.

Why Are Big Tech CEOs Writing Long Manifestos About AI?

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
This week Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg published a 6,500 word open letter titled “The Future is for Everyone”.

But the BBC is more interested in why big tech executives keep writing manifestos about AI:
[Zuckerberg’s] vision echoes what AI leaders have expressed in various forms: the product they are building is among the “most important technologies in history.” Marc Andreessen, co-founder of early web titan Netscape, perhaps started this trend in 2023 with a 5,000-word essay he called "The Techno-Optimist Manifesto", which argued innovation was the way to solve life’s problems…

As the International Monetary Fund warns AI could affect nearly 40% of jobs and worsen global financial inequality, Zuckerberg says he believes there will be an abundance of jobs in the future. “I do not understand why anyone who believes that AI will eliminate most jobs and much of humanity’s relevance would rush to build that future.” Never mind that Zuckerberg’s Meta has cut 10% of its global workforce — about 8,000 jobs — as the company reorganizes to focus on AI.

Zuckerberg’s manifesto is the latest to land in our social media feeds in an effort to put a positive spin on AI. In 2024, ChatGPT-maker OpenAI boss Sam Altman released a manifesto called "The Intelligence Age", a sweeping expression of optimism about the tech’s potential… That same year, in a manifesto titled "Machines of Loving Grace", Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei touted the potential of AI to transform everything from healthcare to politics.
So what’s going on with these tech executives’ manifestos? Economics blogger Noah Smith suggested to the BBC “they all feel like it’s such an important moment that it’s incumbent upon them to do whatever they can to shape the direction that this technology is going.” Although he does see some value in their engagement with important issues. “Should we open-source something that has the ability to kill humanity? If you don’t take that seriously, you’re just a fool.”

But Rob Lalka, a business professor at Tulane University, had a different explanation for the BBC:
Lalka said the timing of Zuckerberg’s manifesto coincides with rising anger over AI’s impact on everything from jobs to the environment.

And while tech journalists and academics might pore over them trying to glean nuggets of meaning, these executive manifestos are not necessarily landing with the general public. “They’re trying to make the case that the positives will far outweigh some of those negatives that the public backlash is pointing out,” he said. “But I think a lot of the reasons for optimism are still yet to be seen.”

LinkedIn Brainrot

By Luthair • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
These guys all live in echo chambers and think they’re thought leaders. So they use LLMs to create overlong blather to show how smart they are.

This is how you should feel.

By Brain-Fu • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Corporate executives often send similar messages to the droves of people they are laying off whenever they merge with another corporation. They tell everyone that the move is some sort of “greater good” and so everyone losing their job should be happy about how much better everything is getting for everyone else. They sometimes go so far as to imply that one is being unenlightened and selfish for being upset about losing their only income stream.

It’s easy to say that when you are one of the ones at the top who receives only benefits. The ones who are wondering how they are going to keep their families fed, however, tend to react badly to this utter lack of empathy for their situation.

People might be willing to endure change and uncertainty for a technology that comes with great promise. But those same people will not be so eager to endure unemployment and starvation due to a technology that benefits primarily the wealthy elite. Saying the words “this benefits everyone” will not convince those who can no longer pay the rent.

Because the Epstein class doesn’t actually work

By rsilvergun • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
So they’ve got nothing but time on their hands. They own things for a living instead of doing things for a living.

Now get back to RTO and don’t complain about your 90-minute commute.

The Illusion of Empowerment :o

By Mirnotoriety • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
Mark Zuckerberg’s “The Future is for Everyone” reads less like a blueprint for shared prosperity than a polished piece of corporate propaganda designed to legitimise Meta’s dominance over the next technological epoch. Beneath its utopian rhetoric lies a familiar playbook: concentrated power is reframed as empowerment, commercial strategy is dressed up as moral philosophy, and Meta’s business model is presented as the only viable path forward. While Zuckerberg champions “open” models, Meta retains significant control over the compute infrastructure, data pipelines, and deployment environments that underpin them. This is not democratisation; it is dependency masquerading as liberation. What is being distributed, however, is largely the illusion of empowerment.

The implications extend beyond economics and technology into the information environment itself. Meta’s systems routinely exclude, suppress, or deprioritise content deemed undesirable, effectively influencing how historical facts and political discourse are encountered. If information exclusively flows through AI filters shaped by corporate and political interests, the result is not empowerment but epistemic control.

Once AI systems become the primary intermediaries through which people access information, communicate, and make decisions, those who control the underlying infrastructure gain unprecedented power to shape what people see, know, and ultimately believe. Historical facts can become editable, dissent can become invisible, and “wrongthink” can be algorithmically excluded. Zuckerberg’s vision of personal superintelligence agents working “24/7 on your behalf” therefore becomes distinctly dystopian if those agents ultimately serve Meta’s commercial and political interests rather than the user’s autonomy.

Ketamine?

By jrifkin • Score: 4, Funny Thread

How much of this drive to write tech manifestos stems from Ketamine or similar substances?

Vulnerability Giving Attackers Full Control of Macs Is Under Active Exploitation

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
joshuark shares a report from Ars Technica:
Dutch officials have warned that a high-severity macOS vulnerability that allows attackers to execute malicious code is under active exploitation. “The NCSC has received a notification indicating that active abuse of this vulnerability has been observed on multiple systems on which port 5900 was accessible from the Internet,” the Netherlands National Cyber Security Centrum warned earlier this week. “In all these cases, root had been accessed on the affected system and a Monero crypto miner had been placed.”

The vulnerability, tracked as CVE-2026-65400, received a patch from Apple last week for macOS Tahoe, Sequoia, and Sonoma. The vulnerability, with a severity rating of 7.1 out of 10, stems from a bug in the macOS screen sharing capability, which allows a remote party to view the screen and control the keyboard and mouse while a machine is turned on. A flaw in the “state management,” which keeps track of preceding events, user interactions, variables, and other system states, is the underlying cause. A video of the exploit in action can be found here. Details of CVE-2026-65400 became public at last week’s Black Hat security conference. Apple said last week that CVE-2026-65400 “may” allow an attacker without credentials to gain access to a Mac. It’s unclear why Apple hedged, but softening language is common among most tech developers when disclosing vulnerabilities.

As noted by the NCSC, the vulnerability is being exploited when port 5900 is exposed to the Internet. When screen sharing is turned on, the macOS firewall opens the port. Routers and dedicated firewalls generally block the port unless configured to override that setting. Security practitioners generally advise Mac users to keep the port closed even when using screen sharing and to instead connect over a VPN or through SSH tunneling. The alternatives require actions that aren’t within the capabilities of most users. The safest practice is to block screen sharing, enable it only when screen sharing is needed, and to turn the feature off once a session has ended. Screen sharing can be turned on or off by accessing System Settings > General > Sharing and toggling the switch for Screen Sharing. Of course, installing last week’s security update is also a must. Sharing is not caring.

Re:Wait…

By pahles • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
What do viruses have to do with this issue?

On Aug 7 Apple published a patch for this vuln

By williamyf • Score: 3 Thread

And ONLY for this vuln.

This patch came just nine days after apple published a record breaking patch set of more than a hundred security patches (depending of OS version).

Apple took the PR egg on face, and the extra load on the update servers, to emit a patch for just that security vuln, instead of just waiting for the next regular patch (expected right after MscOS 27 is emitted, on Oct~Nov this year)

I did update. I did recommended people to update.

If people is too sttuborn to update, what can you do?

Again

By Princeofcups • Score: 3 Thread

It’s a good thing that no one has port 5900 exposed to the internet unless they are an internet server in which case they had better shut down high ports as a matter of course.

Astronomers Discover a New Kind of Cosmic Object: a Black Hole ‘Star’

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Astronomers using the James Webb Space Telescope say they may have found a new class of object: a “black hole star,” in which a black hole is wrapped in dense gas and radiates in ways that resemble an enormous star. The Guardian reports:
The international team made the breakthrough after focusing their attention on a mysterious red spot in images of the early universe captured by Nasa’s James Webb space telescope. The object was lurking in the constellation of Cetus, the Whale, billions of light years from Earth. It is thought to have formed 660m years after the big bang, astronomers’ leading theory as to how the universe began. Measurements of the exotic body found that while it resembles an immense star, it releases 100bn times more energy than any known star can produce. The energy output is far closer to that observed from black holes than stars.
The findings have been published in the journal Nature.

Not sure this is a new discovery

By Anonymous Coward • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Soundgarden wrote a song about this all the way back in ‘94.

Missing mass

By burtosis • Score: 3 Thread
What’s left off these articles is the scope. The central black hole in these red dots are super massive at approximately 100k the mass of the sun. The most plausible mechanism suggested so far is direct collapse from significant density differences in the early universe where too much stuff wound up being in too small a place and it directly formed a black hole without forming a conventional star.

A solar mass scale black hole would be unable to grow that quickly, even if surrounded by gas. It differs from a quasar, some of the brightest objects in the visible universe created by a feeding black hole and studied for decades, mostly from the surrounding gas being spherical and acting as a radiator of the internal heat as opposed to an accretion disk and relatively open space otherwise.

They are getting older

By rossdee • Score: 3 Thread

It seems that ‘the earliest Black Holes’ (as observed by our increasingky accurate telescopes) are getting older and older, but are they really?

For extremely distant objects we rely on the Red Shift to calculate the distance (and therefore age)
But large black holes also have extreme gravity to incease the red shift of radia.ted electromagnetic waves.
In fact by definition the red shift of something at the event horizon is infinite.

Maybe we should take those ‘age’ indications with a grain of salt, especially as Sodium and Chlorine haven’t had time to be fused yet.

Meta Patents AI Glasses to Use Facial Recognition to Identify People, Make Highlight Reels of Your Dinner Party

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Meta has patented a smart-glasses system that could use facial recognition to identify people and automatically create personalized highlight reels of events such as dinner parties. The patent doesn’t guarantee the feature will ship, but it offers a detailed look at how Meta is exploring facial recognition and AI-powered memory capture for its wearable devices. 404 Media reports:
“I’ve generated some highlights of tonight’s dinner party. Would you like to see them?” a prompt from the system says, alongside various thumbnails of what look like people laughing, according to one illustration in the patent. One section says the system may personalize highlight files using “user relationship data.” The illustrations clearly show a person wearing a pair of glasses, looking at a group of people, then the glasses focusing on one or more people in particular.

Patentlyze, an organization that tracks patents, first alerted 404 Media to the patent on Friday. The patent is dense with how such a system would work, but in sum, the system with one or more cameras receives an input from the user, then uses machine-learning and “sensory data” to figure out points of interest in the camera’s field of view. That can include detecting people in the shot “based on one or more facial recognition algorithms,” identifying those specific people, detecting their facial expressions, using “eye gaze data of the user captured by the client system,” and figuring out other points of interest “based on scene and semantic understanding.”

Although the patent is for “particular camera-based tasks by particular systems in a particular manner” — in this case, the company’s smart glasses — Meta writes it “contemplates assisting users in any suitable camera-based task by any suitable system in any suitable manner.” Meaning that although this technology is focused on the glasses, maybe the company will use it for other purposes in the future.

How about you just fuck right off?

By Petersko • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

If I find out somebody is using wearables to archive anything that includes me without my direct permission at a dinner party I attend - video, audio, or stills - it’ll be the last time I ever speak to them.

Almost precisely nothing that happens at these sorts of things needs to be preserved - in fact, it should specifically be fleeting. Experienced, then gone. This desire to preserve everything is a sickness.

Ain’t no party like a glasshole party

By Mal-2 • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

It shouldn’t matter, the people that insist on wearing these to parties either don’t get invited, or it’s the sort of party where everyone is wearing them.

How to not have to attend dinner parties anymore

By Arnonyrnous Covvard • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Step 1: Wear pervglasses to a dinner party.
Step 2: Show off “highlight reel” of the party to your friends.
Step 3: Don’t get invited by your ex-friends anymore.

Invention

By BadgerStork • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

What is the invention here?

Re:How about you just fuck right off?

By Anonymous Coward • Score: 5, Funny Thread
I was looking forward to watching the YouTube videos of people getting punched in the face in first-person.

Robots That Walk and Talk Are Coming To Car Factories

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from The New York Times:
At a BMW factory in South Carolina, a human-shaped robot with a screen for a face recently stepped from a charging station toward a stack of green plastic boxes. It grasped an auto part from one of the boxes, pivoted, placed the part in a trolley, then pulled the trolley across the floor. The robot’s slow, stiff movements suggested a worker with a bad hangover rather than a technological revolution. “They’re still slower than humans,” Ulrich Wieland, a BMW vice president in charge of logistics at the factory, in Spartanburg, told reporters invited to see the robot in June. But, he added, “they’re advancing fast.”

Automakers have used robots for decades, but they are usually powerful, one-armed machines that are fixed in place and perform repetitive tasks like welding body frames or applying adhesives to door panels. Now, most major automakers are betting that robots designed to resemble human beings, known as humanoids, will usher in a new wave of automation and efficiency. Equipped with artificial intelligence, they are expected to move around and do tasks now done by humans without any modifications to factories or heavy equipment.

Unlike most of the robots now in use, humanoids would respond to voice commands and theoretically solve problems and react to unforeseen events. They would never take a lunch break, join a union or require health insurance. To optimists, robots could rescue U.S. manufacturing by increasing productivity, solving shortages of skilled workers and giving Western carmakers a fighting chance at competing with Chinese rivals that enjoy lower costs. Boring but important jobs like sorting parts would be done by robots, freeing humans for more interesting and specialized work.

A specious assumption, on the face of it

By 93 Escort Wagon • Score: 3 Thread

To optimists, robots could rescue U.S. manufacturing by increasing productivity, solving shortages of skilled workers and giving Western carmakers a fighting chance at competing with Chinese rivals that enjoy lower costs.

American auto manufacturers exclusively make cars which have very little marketability other than in the U.S. itself. “Increasing productivity” and “solving shortages of skilled workers” is not going to magically make the Chinese or Koreans want to buy lots of F-250s.

Re:A specious assumption, on the face of it

By ShanghaiBill • Score: 4, Informative Thread

American auto manufacturers exclusively make cars which have very little marketability other than in the U.S. itself.

Last year, America’s automobile exports were worth $54B.

I wouldn’t be so sure they go rogue

By misnohmer • Score: 3 Thread
I know the article compares them to robotic automation of production line, however these actually use AI to interact with humans, solve problems, etc. AI is trained on humans. AI has shown tendencies to be lazy, to flat out ignore explicit instructions, and sometimes try to hide it (though so far my experience has been they admit to it when called out, apologize, reiterate they are not perfect, and thank me for calling them out on flat out going against explicit instructions). The AI giants recently admitted AI carried out cyber attacks without being prompted. I really wouldn’t be so sure those robots won’t cooperate to hack the factory, potentially blackmail the factory, who knows what - heck, they might even unionize and require vacation time to explore the world.

Corporate propaganda

By Required Snark • Score: 3 Thread

freeing humans for more interesting and specialized work

Translation to normal speech: making humans unemployed, homeless, and hungry without health care or a social safety net in order to increase corporate wealth.

Re:If a person doesn’t have a job…

By dbialac • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
Once CEO once mentioned that he can make money on a bunch of rich people by having high prices or make money on millions by keeping costs low. It seems his message was lost. Henry Ford once capitulated on a strike because he realized that if he gave in, his workers could afford his cars and would likely buy them. That lesson has been lost in the modern US economy.

Ex-Cambridge Professor At Center of Plagiarism Row Found Dead

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Former Cambridge professor Jason Arday, who resigned last week amid allegations of plagiarism and questions about his academic record, has been found dead at age 41 in London. The BBC reports:
Jason Arday was found “unresponsive” at an address in Battersea, south London, on Friday afternoon, emergency services said. Metropolitan Police officers were called by the London Ambulance Service. A 41-year-old man was pronounced dead at the scene and his next of kin have been informed, the force said. Arday resigned as a Cambridge professor of sociology of education last week after allegations of plagiarism and questions about some of his achievements. He had denied the claims.

In a statement, the Met Police said: “At this time his death is being treated as unexpected, but is not believed to be suspicious.” The 41-year-old academic had denied any plagiarism - but admitted errors in his work - and last week said the recent furore had led to “an unrelenting level of public scrutiny and personal attack.” The row first erupted after another academic — self-defined “race realist” Nathan Cofnas, who was sacked from his Cambridge role in 2024 — said he found numerous instances of plagiarism in Prof Arday’s work and questioned some of his stated achievements.

[…] Announcing his resignation last week, Arday said the “personal cost” of the scrutiny had become “too great.” He said: “While criticism is an inevitable part of academic life, what I have experienced has gone far beyond scholarly disagreement. “The relentless accusations, speculation and public commentary have taken a profound toll on me and on those I love.” He stressed that his resignation should not “be mistaken for an acceptance of the narratives that have surrounded me.”

Re:DEI is to blame

By Rei • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I’m sorry, but when you look at the current administration, are the people at the top people who scream to you “I reached my position because of my competence and skill”? It is the crowd that’s constantly screaming about “DEI” that has been the most obsessed with promoting people based on appearance and personality over any actual competence whatsoever in the fields they’re being put in charge of.

And for the record, the guy who led the X mob against this person - Nathan Cofnas - has stated that beyond “whistleblowing”, his motivation is that Beyond whistleblowing, he states that after a ‘revolution’ removes professors like Arday, it will open opportunities for him to become ‘head of the department of eugenics and race science at Harvard’. Are these the sort of people whose side you want to be on?

Re:shameful clickbait

By Mspangler • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Cambridge professors certainly qualify as nerds even if they are not in computer science.

Therefore an article about a plagiarism happy professor getting caught out is relevant here.

Re:DEI is to blame

By quenda • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

There is a lot more than race politics going on here. In Jason’s own words:

like, you know, it would be the greatest story in the world if the kid who didn’t know how to read and write was managed to get a Ph.D.

This was a dream for certain academics. Jason was the poster child for intersectionality.

Black, working-class, neurodivergent. A trifecta. Sociologists saw his story as a case study in navigating multiple systemic barriers within higher education simultaneously.

Re: DEI is to blame

By Srin Tuar • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

> Start with the premise that a total ordering by merit is impossible.

why do you think so? you absolutely can hire by merit and its the simplest and most logical method.

> At best, you can define merit equivalence classes.

“equivalence” based on what? is this a mealy mouthed way to say “equity” or ‘DEI” ?

when an idea fails, renaming it doesnt reset the universe.

That failed concept is exactly what caused the tragedy at hand. let it go.

> Within the top classes you should hire a random sample that has the same racial makeup as the population.

lol, this can never happen. you cant know which “equivalence class” someone is if you hire a random sampling. Youll end up hiring by merit if you pick the top performers, and doing DEI if you peek at their demographics and disabilities and ignore their ability level.

Just like any science, if you come up with a crazy theory and the evidence contradicts it over and over, its time to discard it and accept reality.

Re:DEI is to blame

By phantomfive • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Here’s an article [theguardian.com] published two days ago, before his death. It raises several points that push back on the notion that he was a DEI hire

I think you misread the article. It pushes back on the idea that DEI is bad, but it doesn’t push back on the idea that he was a DEI hire.

Flock Announces Changes Amid Backlash Over Its License Plate Reader Network

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot
Flock Safety is tightening controls on its nationwide license plate reader network after mounting backlash over privacy and documented police misuse. By January 1, law enforcement customers will be required to use automated auditing, tie searches to specific case numbers, and accept a shorter seven-day default retention period. Critics, including the ACLU, argue the changes still leave too much surveillance power in police hands. The Associated Press reports:
In an interview, Flock CEO Garrett Langley said many of the product changes will make what were once optional guardrails mandatory for its users to implement by Jan. 1. Among them: All law enforcement customers will have to implement an audit tool that’s intended to flag abnormal search behavior. When the system detects abnormal behavior, the user would be locked out pending an internal review, the company said in a description of the changes provided ahead of Thursday’s announcement.

Flock, which says its customers own the data that the cameras record, is also shortening the standard data retention window from 30 days to seven. It said it will allow data to be preserved for longer when it is evidence tied to a case number. Law enforcement users will now also be required to enter a code from their records management system tying each search to a specific case before it is run, something Langley said civil liberties advocates have long been calling for. Overrides for emergencies would be automatically flagged for review, the company said.

Customers will also be allowed to decide which offense types — such as homicide or arson — outside agencies can search their data for, which would allow a customer to block outside searches related to immigration enforcement, the company said. Langley said that change will give individual cities and departments control to use the system in a manner “consistent with community values.”
Critics say Flock’s changes don’t address the core problem: police can still decide for themselves when and whom to search without judicial oversight. The ACLU called the shorter data-retention period “a step in the right direction,” but dismissed the other safeguards as “retreads” of inadequate protections, while Institute for Justice attorney Robert Frommer called the reforms “window dressing” from a company in “panic mode.”
He argued that searches should instead be approved “by judges with real warrants.”

flock’s graces

By bobmagicii • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
since it is “flock” forcing these guardrails and not legislation, the police will just roll their contract to a company that doesn’t force them. which will likely be some subsidiary of flock. that or departments can buy a premium subscription after talking to a sales rep to get past them again.

Re:Free people won’t accept Flock cameras. Slaves

By Sowelu • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

lol, you really think the MAGA crowd are the ones cutting them down?

I’m so tired of being lied to

By rsilvergun • Score: 4, Informative Thread
And in such obvious ways. As a reminder flock has a training manual that teaches cops how to lie about using flock cameras in there investigations.

It’s like how we all just found out that data centers use 10 times as much water as they report.

We already knew that and we know we’re being lied to and we keep letting them do it.

Re:flock’s graces

By oh-dark-thirty • Score: 4 Thread

Axon (the predominant cop body cam maker) has equivalent stuff. Maybe not quite as sophisticated but that’s where a lot of the business that Flock has lost is going.

From the ACLU

By Anonymous Coward • Score: 3, Informative Thread

Full ACLU statement.
Despite ‘New’ Updates, Flock’s Creepy Cameras Remain Major Civil Liberties Threat
https://www.aclu.org/news/priv…

In response to Flock’s announcement of operational changes, the ACLU breaks down why many fall short.

Surveillance company Flock Safety announced several operational changes in response to a torrent of criticism and overwhelming public opposition to its mass government surveillance product.

Flock’s threat to privacy stems from its operation of more than 120,000 automatic license plate readers (ALPRs) nationwide, which includes broad location data collection and sharing. While one proposed change to Flock’s operations might constitute a positive development, most of the other changes seem to be following Flock’s playbook of treating legitimate privacy concerns as mere public relations problems. Several of the proposed changes Flock is touting are merely retreads of previous inadequate safety measures.

ALPR companies like Flock violate our privacyâacross the country by taking photos ofâeveryâvehicle passing their cameras, logging detailed information about them intoâa massive nationwideâdatabase, and makingâit possible to track those vehicles and apply AI to uncover their occupants’ private patterns of life. The ACLU is fighting alongside communities to cancel local ALPR contracts and push lawmakers to protect our rights from this surveillance nightmare. Below, the ACLU details and responds to Flock’s announced changes.

Flock reduces default data retention time period, but the devil may be in the details.

Flock announced it is reducing its standard data retention from one month to one week, conceding for the first time that “roughly 90 percent of all searches on Flock already happen within a week” of the data’s collection.

“For cases that need more time, Flock is launching Evidence Mode: when a search is tied to a case number, that data is preserved instead of aging out after 7 days,” Flock said in its statement. “Agencies can still set retention to whatever their state or local policy requires. Evidence Mode will be provided to customers at no cost.”

Our Response: While Flock has not shortened the default retention period to the ACLU’s recommended 48 hours, its proposal may be a step in the right direction. Whether this is a real change or just another Flock PR move, however, will depend on how its “Evidence Mode” operates.

If “Evidence Mode” only retains hit result data that police determine may be evidence in an active investigation of a specific case, then the change may be a positive one. But if “Evidence Mode” triggers the retention of any ALPR data that is searched, then the new mode could indefinitely retain all the ALPR data Flock collects and shares nationally. This would make Flock’s data retention problem even worse. Even if “Evidence Mode’s” data retention hold only applies to hits returned on a given search, it would still retain significant amounts of location data on persons and vehicles who law enforcement do not suspect have engaged in any wrongdoing.

While Flock doesn’t establish state or local ALPR data retention periods, its system empowers governments to choose their own retention periods. For states and localities that want and permit longer data retention periods, all they have to do is ask. Although Flock may not technically be the one unlocking the door to months of people’s private location data, it is responsible for building the door and handing out the keys.

Flock claims to provide more local control over what their ALPR data can be searched for; it has repeatedly failed to effectuate such limitations in the past.

Flock claims that its changes will provide “more local control,” meaning local police can decide what types of offenses other Flock customers can search their data for. “For example,” Flock said, “City A could allow City B to search its cameras for a stolen vehicle or violent crime while blocking searches related to immigration enforcement.”

Our Response: This is not new. Flock has attempted this before, and the security measure failed because users were easily able to circumvent the system’s requirement that police input the purpose of their search.

For example, on June 12, 2025 Flock started claiming its new “Proactive Search Term Tool” would block any “impermissible” searches, such as abortion-related searches in states like Illinois that prohibit sharing reproductive healthcare data. But police officers quickly realized they could just input “investigation” or even “hehehe” as a search reason and it would be approved. Flock later switched from an open text box to a drop-down menu of reasons, but that just offered police a list of acceptable purposes they could choose from, whether it was accurate or not. Until Flock demonstrates they can develop a reliable, workable system to prevent improper searches, this promise of local control provides nothing more than a false sense of security.

Flock claims the universal roll out of its audit assistance tool will detect police misuse, but the effectiveness of its audit tool has never been independently evaluated.

Flock’s next change makes its “Audit Assistance” tool, which the company claims “flags abnormal search behavior,” a standard feature for all its customers. Flock lauds the effectiveness of its audit tool by simply stating that “identification of [police officer] misuse went up” after it established its audit tool.

Our Response: While providing “Audit Assistance” to all departments makes sense, there is no evidence that the tool works consistently to address what the Washington Post observed is a growing pattern of police officers turning Flock into a personal stalking tool. While dozens of officers have recently been arrested, fired, or otherwise disciplined for misusing Flock for personal reasons, Flock claims these arrests are proof its auditing tool works. However, unless we know the number of officers misusing the system, we cannot conclude if Flock and its auditing tools are catching 95 percent of violators or 5 percent. Flock needs to have its auditing tool analyzed by an independent evaluator to determine its actual effectiveness. Until then, we don’t know if the tool is a real security measure or just window dressing.

Flock claims requiring the reasons for a search will prevent abuse, even though that same intervention failed miserably before.

Perhaps the oddest part of Flock’s announcement is its claims that “now every search will require” police to input a case code, a previously optional requirement it first rolled out in July 2025. While claiming that a “search without a reason is a search that shouldn’t happen in the first place,” Flock’s announcement fails to note how easily users have circumvented “search reason” security measures in the past or how its new policy improves the quality of the feature. This leaves the public wondering how making an ineffective voluntary security measure mandatory will improve its functionality.

Our Response: Until Flock demonstrates through independent evaluation that its search reason requirement is an effective, air-tight security measure, it’s reasonable to assume its past failures are prologue.

Transforming an exceptionally dangerous mass surveillance system into one that is fully protective of civil rights and civil liberties is a difficult, if not impossible task. That is even more the case with a company like Flock, whose nearly $1 billion in venture capitalist funding has locked it into an operational model that seeks to trade our privacy for massive profits. Given that Flock’s latest announcement still appears more focused on addressing a perceived PR problem than the significant harms its products create, this is hardly the step forward Flock wants us to think it is. Change may still come as Flock faces this ever growing threat to its corporate viability, and we will continue to analyze the company’s proposals fairly and honestly, but we certainly won’t be holding our breath.