Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Polestar Banned From Selling Cars In US From Model Year 2027
  2. Trump Administration Asks OpenAI To Stagger Release of New Model
  3. Linux Foundation Launches Akrites To Coordinate AI-Driven Open Source Security
  4. Apple Raises Prices On Macs, iPads, and More By Hundreds of Dollars
  5. LastPass Says Hackers Stole Customer Support Case Data During Klue Breach
  6. Anthropic Says Alibaba Must Be Punished For Largest Claude Cloning Attack
  7. Ford Rehires 350 Engineers After AI Fails To Preserve Expertise or Train Juniors
  8. Micron Locks In Historically High Memory Prices For Five Years
  9. Google Starts Lowering Play Store Fees, Making Good On Epic Games Settlement
  10. New Study Shows That Tall Vehicle Hoods Cause Hundreds More Deaths Per Year
  11. NASA Rover Detects Potential Signatures of Ancient Microbial Life On Mars
  12. Stripe, Anthropic, and OpenAI Are Backing Effort To Stop Respiratory Infections
  13. Slate Auto’s Radically Simple Electric Truck Starts At $24,950
  14. Meta Pauses Employee-Tracking Program Following Internal Data Leak
  15. GTA VI Is a Worrying Sign For the Future of Physical Games

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Polestar Banned From Selling Cars In US From Model Year 2027

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Longtime Slashdot reader schwit1 shares a report from autoevolution:
The U.S. Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security denied Polestar an authorization under the Connected Vehicle Rule. Polestar will continue to sell its existing inventory of Polestar 3 and 4 crossovers in the United States and will continue to offer support to customers and access to its service network. But no new 2027 models will set wheels on American soil.

The Connected Vehicle Rule is a regulation that restricts the import and sale of vehicles equipped with Vehicle Connectivity Systems (VCS) and Automated Driving Systems (ADS) tied to foreign adversaries, primarily from China and Russia. Polestar is owned by Chinese auto giant Geely, which has also been the parent company of Swedish brand Volvo since 2010. However, Volvo has recently been granted authorization to sell connected vehicles in the United States.

The rule, set out by the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS), classifies modern vehicles as mobile data centers and is designed to protect national security by keeping sensitive driver data and vehicle control systems out of the hands of foreign governments. Michael Lohscheller, Polestar CEO, confirms that the company is well aware that the automotive industry is entering a new phase, based on regional dynamics. So, Polestar will shift its strategy to its biggest market as it is preparing its exit from the U.S. market.
The report notes that Polestar sold 5,384 cars in the U.S. in 2025, with 60,119 units sold globally.

The best outcome…

By devloop • Score: 3 Thread
The best possible outcome would be for Polestar to release EVs with no connectivity systems and no automated driving systems, for the US market.

Not a fatal blow

By marcle • Score: 3 Thread

According to the article, US sales account for about 12% of global sales, so they don’t depend on the US market.

Trump Administration Asks OpenAI To Stagger Release of New Model

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
The Trump administration has reportedly asked OpenAI to stagger the release of GPT-5.6 over security concerns. The model will initially be offered to a small group of partners, with the government “approving access customer by customer during this preview period,” reports The Information. The request came from conversations with the Office of the National Cyber Director and the Office of Science and Technology Policy, the report said.

Bygone days.

By fahrbot-bot • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

with the government “approving access customer by customer during this preview period,

Remember the days when Republicans said the government shouldn’t be picking winners and losers? Maybe that’s only when Democrats are in charge …

Re:Bygone days.

By ArchieBunker • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

That was before they started walking around in literal fucking clown shoes because daddy bought them. https://www.theguardian.com/co…

Linux Foundation Launches Akrites To Coordinate AI-Driven Open Source Security

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
BrianFagioli writes:
The Linux Foundation has announced Akrites, a new initiative to coordinate vulnerability disclosure and remediation for critical open source software as AI dramatically speeds up vulnerability discovery. Founding members include AWS, Google, Microsoft, OpenAI, Red Hat, NVIDIA, IBM, Cisco, JPMorganChase, and others. Akrites will provide a shared Security Incident Response Team (SIRT), a standardized coordinated vulnerability disclosure process, and act as a “maintainer of last resort” for abandoned but widely used packages.

The goal is to reduce duplicate reports, avoid conflicting patches, and help upstream maintainers address vulnerabilities before they can be exploited. As AI makes it easier to find security flaws, can a coordinated industry effort help protect open source, or does it risk giving large corporations too much influence over the ecosystem?
“Akrites is the largest coordinated effort in history to create systems and deploy tooling that leverages the collective power of the community to make everyone safer,” the Linux Foundation said in an open letter. “Akrites participants will contribute engineering resources; work to build and ship fixes; or fund the engineers who do. Some companies have contributed mightily already. The reality is, collectively, we need to contribute more.”

Apple Raises Prices On Macs, iPads, and More By Hundreds of Dollars

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Apple has sharply raised prices across its Mac, iPad, HomePod, and Apple TV lineups as surging AI-driven demand creates a global memory and storage shortage. Increases range from $30 for the HomePod mini to $1,300 for the M3 Ultra Mac Studio, with Apple CEO Tim Cook saying efforts to shield customers from higher costs had become “unsustainable.” The Verge reports:
On Thursday, the company adjusted the price of its new MacBook Neo, which will now start at $699 instead of $599, while the base MacBook Air will jump to $1,299 from $1,099, as reported earlier by Bloomberg. The 14-inch MacBook Pro is getting an increase as well, going from $1,699 to $1,999. Meanwhile, the iPad Air will now start at $749 instead of $599, while the iPad Pro is increasing to $1,199 from $999.

As spotted by MacRumors, the M4 Max Mac Studio will now cost $2,499, a big jump from $1,999. The M3 Ultra Mac Studio is now priced at $5,299, up from $3,999. Apple is even raising the prices of its HomePod, which now costs $349 instead of $299, as well as bumping the price of the HomePod mini to $129 instead of $99. The Apple TV also now costs $199 instead of $129.

Because they can.

By dgatwood • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

They raised prices because they can. The shortage gave them cover.

If Chinese manufacturers can sell an iPad-size Android device with more RAM than an iPad for just $160 retail, this is not about the cost of RAM. Subtract Amazon’s 35%, and the total cost of a machine with 40 GB of RAM is no more than $104, and RAM is maybe 5 to 10 percent of that cost, so the wholesale cost of 32 GB of RAM for an iPad is probably no more than $10. And they’re cranking up the price by $150. RAM prices did not go up by 1500%.

It is clear to even a casual observer that Apple is just taking advantage of the massively inflated consumer price for the small amount of RAM that isn’t being bought up by computer and device manufacturers, and is assuming that users won’t be shocked to see their computer prices go up comparably. But those of us who have a clue recognize that the reason for retail price increases is that companies like Apple have multi-year contracts for nearly all the RAM, and the folks selling parts at retail are getting what’s left over. I can pretty much guarantee Apple’s prices aren’t fluctuating nearly as much.

So of that $150, probably about $145 will show up as increased profits.

Guess I’ll hold on to my M1 MacBook Pro and my iPhone 15 Pro for a few years longer. I was thinking about upgrading. Now I’m not. And I bought an Android tablet instead of an iPad two weeks ago because the prices were already way too high for what you get. Apple is pricing themselves out of the market, even for folks like me who have used Apple hardware exclusively since the mid-1990s and have high disposable income.

Selling fewer and fewer products at higher and higher prices is exactly why Apple nearly went bankrupt in the 1990s. This is not a winning strategy. They’ve tried this before.

Re:Who’s Who?

By Brain-Fu • Score: 4, Informative Thread

So, why DO people buy Apple? They know it is more expensive. Clearly, they believe they are getting something that is worth that price.

Apple goes to great efforts to protect user privacy. Some of what they do might just be promises and/or lies, but that is still better than the alternatives available, that openly spy on everything they can and sell it to whoever wants to buy it. For people who have the money to afford Apple products, it’s worth it.

Of course there are free open source solutions that protect privacy, but they require greater tech knowledge to use and have more compatibility issues (there are always a group of Linux users that get all bent out of shape when someone says this. Too bad. I use Linux a lot and I am very familiar with the issues that crop up that the Linux community likes to pretend don’t crop up).

There’s also the matter of user experience. When I use windows 11, I fell pushed-around and limited. When I use MacOS, I feel obeyed and empowered. Your mileage may vary, but this was enough for me to buy Apple.

I hate windows enough that my gaming rig runs Linux. I love Apple enough that my “everything serious” machine runs MacOS. Even with these price hikes, I will still go Apple over Windows any day of the week, should I need another machine for any purpose other than gaming.

Re:That’s perfectly okay!

By Jeremi • Score: 4, Funny Thread

I’m an Apple fan; I’m typing this on a 2018 Mac Mini that I spent roughly $2K on — but it’s 2026 and that Mac is still running just great. That works out to an amortized cost of about 68 cents per day — which is to say, negligible compared to my other expenses.

Trying to save money by buying cheap computer hardware is like trying to save money by buying single-ply toilet paper — you can do it, sure, but why make your life noticeably worse when the amount of money you’ll save is trivial?

Re:Who’s Who?

By BenBoy • Score: 5, Funny Thread

> Saved myself $1040. That was right before the price hikes.
Oof, bet that hurts. Think of how much you’d have saved if you’d waited until today …

LastPass Says Hackers Stole Customer Support Case Data During Klue Breach

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
LastPass says hackers stole customers’ personal information, support case records, and sales data by breaching market research partner Klue. The password manager told TechCrunch that its own systems and password vaults were unaffected. However, the hackers used their access to obtain “reams of data about LastPass customers,” the report says. From the report:
In a blog post that shared information about the incident, LastPass said the hackers took customers’ names, phone numbers, email addresses, and physical addresses, as well as customer support case data and sales-related data. It’s not yet known what was in the contents of customer support tickets, although they likely contain fragments of potentially private or sensitive information. Customers typically contact customer service when they are having a billing issue or need assistance in gaining access to their accounts. Past incidents involving customer support tickets have included credentials and government-issued identity documents.
The last data breach LastPass reported was in 2022, when hackers stole the company’s entire store of customer password vaults.

You’re having sex with every LastPass partner

By JoeyRox • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Password manager maker LastPass is notifying customers that their personal information and customer support case records were stolen during a recent hack at one of its technology partners, marking the company’s latest data breach in recent years.

The expression “when you have sex with someone, you’re having sex with every one of their partners as well” appears to apply to security software providers as well.

I guess …

By PPH • Score: 4, Funny Thread

… LastPass is Klue-less.

Potentially private or sensitive information?

By crunchy_one • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
I’d wager a guess that this information includes the accounts that the customer is using LastPass to store passwords for. Even without the passwords themselves, this could be some really juicy blackmail material.

Number 6!

By gabrieltss • Score: 3 Thread
This makes the 6th data breach they have had. Why anyone would still be using them is a total mystery to me!

There are roughly five -publicly- disclosed security incidents (how many not publicly disclosed?):
2011
2015 - one of the two of the worst
2016
2017
2022 - 2023 - the worst


Now you can add 2026 to the list

Who was using Last Pass?

By Murdoch5 • Score: 3 Thread
The last time Last Pass was hacked, they intentionally surrendered the personal data of their customers. They claim the vaults were encrypted, but honestly, can you trust them? We already know their customer service and communication standards were / are, horrific, lacking any use of PGP, or similar security mechanisms. Once their last hack took place, that was a flashing red alert to jump ship, frankly anyone who stayed behind, knew this was coming again.

The problem now seems to be that the company committing mass digital molestation was hacked, who should not have had anything stored, so what does it really say about Last Pass? They’re admitting they did not store the data using any form of acceptable security, and they’ve already surrendered password vaults, so will people jump ship now?

Security and privacy claims are useless if you constantly demonstrate that your entire security understanding is putting the wallet inside the shoe when you’re at the beach.

Anthropic Says Alibaba Must Be Punished For Largest Claude Cloning Attack

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica:
Anthropic has accused the Chinese firm Alibaba of launching the largest attack yet attempting to clone Claude, as China races to match the capabilities of Anthropic’s leading model following Mythos’ release and subsequent restriction from foreign markets. Ars obtained a June 10 letter sent to Senators Tim Scott (R-S.C.) and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) one day ahead of a Senate committee hearing on “AI and the American Dream.” In the letter, Anthropic shared “new, confidential evidence of the largest campaign to illicitly extract Claude’s capabilities we have ever measured.”

The attacks occurred between April 22 and June 5, when “operators afliated with Alibaba and Alibaba Qwen, Alibaba’s AI lab” allegedly generated “more than 28.8 million exchanges with Claude through almost 25,000 fraudulent accounts,” Anthropic said. Violating Claude’s terms of service and access restrictions, this campaign “targeted some of Claude’s most valuable capabilities, such as agentic reasoning, software engineering, and long-horizon tasks.” According to Anthropic, Alibaba evaded detection by “using obfuscation techniques and proxy networks.” As Chinese demand for reliable obfuscation techniques increases, Anthropic warned there’s already “a growing circumvention economy” to fuel an ever-expanding web of future distillation attacks. […]

“Alibaba is governed by an independent board, none of whom has any military affiliation,” Alibaba said. “Its products and services are built for retail, logistics, and enterprise information technology — not weapons, defense, or intelligence.” Anthropic appears unconvinced, however, that Alibaba isn’t working with the Chinese government. In the letter, Anthropic warned that without stronger interventions, these distillation attacks will “help China reach Mythos Preview-level capabilities sooner.”

To keep the US ahead of China, Anthropic recommended that Congress pass legislation with three objectives. First, antitrust laws must be updated to allow AI firms to share information about evolving Chinese tactics to deter more threats. Second, the US needs more export controls on chips to hamstring Chinese access to advanced compute so that they simply can’t train on US model outputs. That could make conducting distillation attacks pointless, Anthropic suggested. Finally, Congress should pass laws penalizing Chinese labs’ “bad behavior” so that it’s “more difficult and costly” to rely on distillation attacks to advance Chinese models. Penalties could include limiting Chinese firms from accessing US models or advanced US chips or from relying on data centers outside of China, Anthropic suggested.

Vizzini

By Anonymous Coward • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

You’re trying to kidnap what I’ve rightfully stolen!

“Working with the government”

By darkain • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Yeah, they are. We know they are. That isn’t magical knowledge. It happens in every country, and is mostly public knowledge. Guess who the US Military works with? Just look at publicly disclosed contracts. BAM, not that hard. Hell, AWS openly advertises its “Gov Cloud” region. Who the fuck do you think the “gov” is? Yeah. You think Alibaba doesn’t do the same domestically? Of fucking course they do. Governments don’t operate in vacuums, they have contracts with vendors to build shit, even if its the same shit a normal consumer can get.

Re:“Working with the government”

By XopherMV • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
China is a communist country. That’s a whole other level of government involvement in the economy and specific companies such as Alibaba than you’ll find anywhere in the US.

Pot… meet kettle…

By Morpeth • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

All of these massive LLM companies were built on stealing copyrighted materials and other prior work to train their models (and then profit from it without paying for the data/images/etc), so the whole thing is hilariously thick with irony. “Hey, you can’t steal the sh*t I stole!”

Now where did I put that teeny tiny violin…

Re:“Working with the government”

By XopherMV • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
Your comment completely ignores the previous one. In a communist society, companies and the government are one entity. They are the same. That is fundamentally different from how companies and government works in capitalist societies.

Ford Rehires 350 Engineers After AI Fails To Preserve Expertise or Train Juniors

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
After Ford’s automated quality-control systems and AI tools fell short, the automaker hired 350 veteran engineers over the past three years to mentor younger staff and reprogram the underperforming technology. “Artificial intelligence is a fantastic tool, but it’s only as good as the information you use to train it,” Charles Poon, Ford’s vice president of vehicle hardware engineering, told reporters on a call Wednesday. “Over prior years, we didn’t pay as much attention as we should have to the experience of our most knowledgeable engineers that have been with us through many product cycles.” Bloomberg reports:
Those engineers were “at the heart” of Ford’s efforts to turn around quality problems, said Kumar Galhotra, chief operating officer. They now run mandatory meetings that rigorously troubleshoot quality problems and they have reprogrammed AI tools to head off glitches before they happen. “We had been relying more and more on automated quality systems” and not getting the desired results, Galhotra said. “We brought back technical specialists” and “they hunt for failure points before a part ever reaches the plant floor.”

The return of the veteran engineers at Ford cuts against the prevailing wisdom — and fear — that AI will replace all kinds of knowledge workers. But Ford found the machines couldn’t replace experience. “Mistakenly we thought that by just introducing artificial intelligence and ingesting the design requirements that we had, that that would produce a high-quality product,” Poon said. But “we recognized that for us to enhance some of our automation and machine learning and artificial intelligence tools we needed to ensure that they were trained by the most experienced individuals.”

As a result of the efforts of the old hands, Ford vaulted above quality stalwarts such as Toyota and Honda on JD Power’s bellwether survey that measures the quality of a car during the first three months of ownership. Only luxury brands Porsche and Genesis topped Ford this year.

Truth behind doublespeak

By SouthSeb • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I understand Ford is trying to gloss over this story, like they’re some sort of humble and benevolent company, but the reality is transparent:

“We fired senior, experienced engineers, tried to substitute them with AI and it didn’t work. Now we’re rehired some of them to train AI more, so we can fire them again in the near future.”

Re:Shows you what they were thinking

By 0123456 • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

The surprising part is that any of the engineers went back after the company had treated them like that. I guess they’ll just be saving money until they get sacked again.

Same Ford asking for bills to outlaw repair

By AcidFnTonic • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Same Ford asking for bills to outlaw repair. Don’t forget they really could care less about your ability to repair your own vehicle.

This is certainly debatable, but

By pr0t0 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
It’s not just about how to build the widget. I’ve long held that one of the most valuable assets an employee brings to his/her employer is their historical and institutional knowledge. Why all the various choices were made all along the way, where the skeletons are buried, and how to handle a specific vendor or customer to achieve the desired outcome often provide greater value than just how to tighten the nut on the bolt. A failure to recognize that is a failure of leadership.

Re:Shows you what they were thinking

By 93 Escort Wagon • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

The surprising part is that any of the engineers went back after the company had treated them like that. I guess they’ll just be saving money until they get sacked again.

What alternative do you think these guys had? They’ve got bills to pay and families to feed, and all of these companies have been dumping skilled employees like crazy due to leadership’s sophomoric belief that AI can do everything.

Micron Locks In Historically High Memory Prices For Five Years

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Micron has signed 16 “strategic customer agreements” (SCAs) that include a floor price the company says comes with “a very robust gross margin for Micron, well above our peak quarterly margins in any past cycle.” Most of the deals run through 2030 and cover about 40% of Micron’s revenue. The Register reports:
Micron CEO, president and chairman Sanjay Mehrotra explained the SCAs in prepared remarks delivered during the company’s Q3 earnings call. He explained that Micron has signed 16 SCAs, most of them covering 2026 to 2030, and that they involve a commitment to buy a certain quantity of product and pay for it in a pricing band that has a floor and a ceiling price. The floor price covers the historically high gross margins mentioned above, and the ceiling price means those who commit to an SCA are insulated if memory prices go even higher.

The CEO said 16 customers have signed SCAs and then explained why it’s worth locking into the deals even though they bake in such high margins. “Our customers are recognizing that supply shortages in memory and storage will take considerable time to improve,” he said. “Even as we expect industry supply to improve gradually in 2028, we currently do not have line of sight as to when memory supply will be able to catch up with increasing demand.”

Even massive efforts to build new chip fabs aren’t much help, he said, because the increasing complexity of new memory types means it takes longer to build factories — and when they come online there still won’t be enough capacity to build both the high-bandwidth memory needed for AI and other types of NAND and DRAM. “Supply is structurally constrained in its growth and ability to meet industry demand, despite our comprehensive efforts to increase supply,” he said.

Don’t assume that SCAs mean your suppliers get price certainty, because Mehrotra said the deals will account for 40 percent of Micron revenue — meaning the company is reserving most of its inventory to sell at prices it can negotiate. The CEO did have a little good news in the form of predictions that Micron’s DRAM output in 2026 will “grow in the low- to mid-20s percentage range, slightly above our prior outlook.” He also revealed that the SCAs see customers pay up front, which helps Micron to fund its fab expansions.

Raping users is back on the menu, boys!

By JustAnotherOldGuy • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

“Raping users is back on the menu, boys! Now get out there and change all the prices!”

Not necessarily bad for consumers

By Petersko • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Sure, it’s not great for anybody looking to build a new box, but there is an upside. If you’re a gamer, your current kit got a life extension. And developers just got a reprieve from having to chase new tiers of hardware performance. I don’t think it’s a bad thing for the consumer world to just hole up, take a pause for a couple of years, and mature what’s already in place. Look at what happens to console game performance on year 1 vs year 5. The hardware doesn’t change, but everything gets better.

Of course all of the other things that have ram may become problematic… but a lot of those don’t use cutting edge ram. They use old shit because it’s plentiful and cheap.

Of course it’s a mixed bag. I’m not claiming it doesn’t irk me to see prices like this. I’m just saying it’s not 100% bad.

Morons

By CEC-P • Score: 3 Thread
If your customers can’t buy PCs because there aren’t any, nobody can but dumb AI bullshit. Also, most dumb AI bullshit will be bankrupt in 5 years regardless. I suggest they make some fucking DDR5 instead of HVM before they regret it.

I feel like this signals something.

By nightflameauto • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

If a company is announcing that they’ve locked 16 bigger customers into historically high pricing, while locking themselves out of rising to meet future potential prices, is that a signal that we’ve about hit the peak of the memory demand / high-price cycle? Something tells me if they went out of their way to get these price floors in place, someone in the company saw the potential for that floor to be pierced in the next few months. I mean, you’d think the signing companies would consider this possibility too, but it’s entirely possible that FOMO on AI is keeping them at the peak of the wave during negotiations.

Something about this situation just strikes me as a tell. Maybe I’m wrong, but it seems like it’s a predictor of something changing.

Micron boasts about price-fixing, loudly

By ebunga • Score: 3 Thread

What’s old is new again.

Google Starts Lowering Play Store Fees, Making Good On Epic Games Settlement

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica:
Google spent the last few years locked in a legal grudge match with Epic Games, which claimed that Google’s stewardship of the Play Store was anticompetitive. Now, the companies are thick as thieves, and Google is beginning to implement app store changes as agreed in its settlement with Epic. The lower developer fees and new payment options that Google promised are rolling out in select markets this month before expanding. […] Starting on June 30, developers in Europe, the UK, and the US will have access to the new fee structure. This system will split the commission into two components: billing and service fees.

The biggest win for small developers is the new flat 10 percent service fee for the first $1 million in earnings every year. Above that, the rate for various transaction types may reach 25 percent on existing installs. Apps installed after June 30 will top out at 20 percent. Developers will finally be allowed to send users outside the Play Store to complete a transaction, too. Google says they can design a choice screen “in accordance with our UX guidelines” to direct users to these external options. Devs pay the standard service fee on these purchases, but they’ll avoid the billing fee. All transactions that run through Google’s Play Store platform add a 5 percent billing fee — even the base rate for publishers earning less than $1 million. Google notes that the billing fee is set at 5 percent in the initial markets, but it could be different in other regions.
Google will expand the new fee structure globally through September 2027, while also offering reduced fees through updated developer programs.
Although the changes may let developers retain more revenue, Google will continue controlling Android distribution and collecting a share of sales as it works toward allowing certified third-party app stores to operate more like the Play Store.

New Study Shows That Tall Vehicle Hoods Cause Hundreds More Deaths Per Year

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
joshuark shares a report from Car and Driver:
A new study conducted by the New York Times shows that the increase in vehicle hood height seen over the last two and a half decades, mainly due to the rise in popularity of large SUVs and trucks, has resulted in several thousand deaths that otherwise may not have happened. The study shows that while automakers and regulators have focused on occupant safety, they have turned a blind eye to pedestrian safety, which has fallen since around 2009. Researchers looked at four main datasets in their investigation: crash test data from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s (NHTSA) Crash Report Sampling System (CRSS) from 2016 to 2024; NHTSA’s Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS); vehicle measurement data from Expert AutoStats; and vehicle registration data from S&P Global from 2002 to 2024. The researchers concluded that the increased danger to pedestrians is caused by two main culprits.

First, large SUVs and trucks have taller hoods, raising the point of impact above most people’s center of gravity and pushing them to the ground, typically hard asphalt, rather than up and onto the hood, which is designed to absorb impacts. Second, with larger A-pillars designed to protect occupants in rollover crashes, modern cars tend to have larger blind spots than cars sold at the turn of the century (presuming the 21st century). The shift toward vehicles with taller hoods led to roughly 3000 deaths between 2016 and 2024. This number is conservative because it does not include crashes that take place in parking lots, driveways, or private roads, which aren’t part of the federal database.

The data also showed an estimated 2.8 percent increase in the odds of a pedestrian fatality for every one-inch increase in vehicle hood height. Between two different scenarios, one decreasing the hood height of every vehicle in the dataset by 3 inches, and the second using a random sampling of hood heights from 2002 across 10,000 simulated crashes, between 2624 (for scenario two) and 3077 (for scenario one) lives could have been saved from 2016 to 2024.

Re:So do people who don’t raise their seats

By DarkOx • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Belt-lines in cars got really high because that is how you achieve that roll over safety rating.

As a driver I hate that every sedan and SUV has these super high belt lines and wide as my head A-pillars now. Every time I get in my 80s classic on the weekend it reminds me how much my visibility is in fact impaired in my daily.

Do and realistically am I much safer in my 2020’s car - yes, do I also belive I am more likely to be involved in some for of accident because I can’t see as much also yes.

Most common case country T intersection with yield on one road and no stops. (Probably the most dangerous type of intersection) There will be a 30 yard long space along the perpendicular road, that is a blind spot because of that thick pillar. Obviously that leads to the only safe driving practice being, be slow enough to come to a complete stop at the intersection until you are near enough to see completely down the road looking over your shoulder. Which by extension forces you to approach quite slowly or subject you and your passengers to uncomfortably short stops, should there be another vehicle approaching.

Meanwhile in the vintage car with A-pilars just bulky enough to hold up the roof, there basically isn’t a blind spot large enough to conceal a vehicle or cyclist for any period of time, so they will be detected on the second look if not the first, and you able to see for miles down the perpendicular road over top of the soy beans..

Modern cars kind of suck for driving..

Re:And water

By allo • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Maybe you should prioritize human safety and not cars. Just an idea.

Re: Taller hoods?

By dj245 • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Not to mention these vehicles are a huge pain to work on. I changed the spark plugs in a 150/1500 class truck recently and had to lay down on to of the engine on a chunk of old mattress to reach any of them. And needed a 2-step stepladder to get up there. I’ve since changed to a Ridgeline and you can reach anywhere in the bed and most of the engine without a ladder. The interest in the Slate and recent sales of smaller trucks suggest that this is a growing market.

Re:Build stupid cars

By JoshuaZ • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Unfortunately, the people buying or building the big cars are not the people being hit by them.

Re:Why

By rocket rancher • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Why do cars have tall hoods, long hoods and off-centre driving positions? I dont think every car should be a go kart but I never understood why a centred view with more near visibility would not be desirable.

The off-center driver position is not the bad design choice here. That part is mostly boring old human-factors engineering. You are on the right track when you talk about a centered view with more near visibility. You just need a slightly bigger picture. In right-side traffic countries, the driver sits on the left because that puts the driver’s eyes closer to the centerline of the road, which improves sight lines for oncoming traffic, passing, lane placement, and not shaving the paint off opposing vehicles. The view you are optimizing is not the center line of the vehicle, but the center line of the road it is travelling down. In left-side traffic countries, you just mirror this. The “best” side is whichever side puts the driver closest to the middle of the road.

With that said, to bring this back to your question about tall and long hoods—the defenders of the modern brodozer will inevitably point to two things: physics and the EPA. They aren’t entirely wrong. Pushing modern trucks to absurd 15,000-lb towing capacities requires massive radiators, which dictate taller front ends. Furthermore, the EPA’s CAFE footprint rules actively incentivized automakers to bloat vehicle dimensions to qualify for laxer fuel economy targets. But while engineering requirements and federal loopholes provided the massive canvas, they don’t explain the aggressively hostile design language painted onto it.

The aesthetic decisions behind these front ends flow from a fairly straight-forward psychological model of the truck-buying American public. They are based on a phenomenon that social psychologists call “status signalling compensatory consumption.” Study after study show that an economically significant chunk of the male demographic buys status-signaling products to patch perceived deficits in their social power, status, identity, or masculinity. Marketing departments didn’t accidentally discover that pickups sell better when wrapped in dominance cosplay, cliff-face grillework, and ad copy that smells faintly of elk musk. These front ends aren’t optimized for pedestrian safety, or even aerodynamic efficiency; they are optimized to extract $80,000 from buyers desperate to project the authority they feel they lack.

NASA Rover Detects Potential Signatures of Ancient Microbial Life On Mars

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
NASA’s Perseverance rover has detected complex organic carbon in ancient Martian mudstones. The measurements were taken by the rover’s Sherloc instrument and the organic carbon that was identified was from the Bright Angel outcrop, “a dried-up river that carried water into the planet’s Jezero crater billions of years ago,” notes The Guardian. From the report:
The form of carbon detected, known as macromolecular carbon or MMC, can originate from living organisms. Geological processes can also produce the material, meaning its detection does not amount to proof of past Martian life. Dr Ashley Murphy at the Planetary Science Institute in Arizona said MMC can be found in different settings and types of rocks. “It may originate from biological sources such as fossilized organic matter found in microbial mats and coal,” she said, but could also form in reactions between rocks and water or arrive on impacting meteorites.

The mudstone rocks from the Bright Angel outcrop caused a stir in 2024 when the Perseverance rover discovered intriguing surface spots and nodules that resemble features produced by fossilized microbes on Earth. When the scientific details were published last year, Sean Duffy, the former acting head of Nasa, said: “This very well could be the clearest sign of life that we’ve ever found on Mars.” […] The discovery means Nasa rovers have now found organic-bearing mudstones more than 2,000 miles apart on Mars. The others were reported by the Curiosity rover which is exploring the planet’s Gale crater. It “indicates that the habitability of Mars, and the availability of organics, may have been widespread across the planet billions of years ago,” the authors write in Science Advances.

Alternative headline

By greytree • Score: 4, Funny Thread
“Chemical that can form in reactions between rocks and water found where water ran over rocks.”

Hands off the MC MMC stage name, it’s mine.

By T34L • Score: 3, Insightful Thread

Seriously though, I’m glad they’re still searching, and it’s neat to see that even if we haven’t found life yet, even places as inhospitable as Mars probably had the building blocks of life at some point and another. If life-forming environments are common and life isn’t, it’s positive points towards our chances of being past the great filter; I sure welcome those these days.

Alternative article

By 4im • Score: 5, Informative Thread

https://www.space.com/astronomy/mars/did-nasa-just-find-evidence-of-ancient-life-on-mars-perseverance-rover-spots-complex-carbon-in-red-planet-rocks

No need to accept cookie-raping-or-subscription The Guardian, when you can reject cookies from others.

More clarity on Fermis Paradox.

By Qbertino • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

It’s taking shape: Basic life may actually be quite common. Naked apes typing on keyboards on a digital network they built themselves not so much.

The rare earth and rare advanced intelligent life theories just got some extra weight.

It’s never aliens.

By gurps_npc • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

This is about the 5th time I remember someone saying they found ‘signs’ of alien life, and it never is.

Stripe, Anthropic, and OpenAI Are Backing Effort To Stop Respiratory Infections

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from MIT Technology Review:
[T]he payment company Stripe, founded by brothers Patrick and John Collison, says it will fund a new $500 million nonprofit whose goal is preventing both the common cold and the flu. Its eventual aim is to get rid of respiratory viruses altogether. The new organization, called Intercept, will use grants and investments to back prevention approaches, including vaccines, as well as large-scale air-cleaning systems for schools, offices, and other public spaces. In addition to Stripe, other funders include Anthropic, Flu Lab, and the OpenAI Foundation, as well as Bill Gates and several traders at the quantitative investing fund Jane Street Capital, according to an Intercept spokesperson.

“I think we treat respiratory infections as a minor nuisance, but have really underweighted the burden that they impose on society,” says Nan Ransohoff, the Stripe executive leading the initiative along with Charlie Petty, a venture capitalist who joined Stripe this year. On average, people spend 5% of their lifetime fighting a cold or the flu, according to Ransohoff. Despite that, drug companies put relatively little effort into preventing colds. Part of the problem is that the sniffles are caused by more than 200 different viruses, according to the American Lung Association, with rhinoviruses being the most common culprits. There are so many that it typically doesn’t pay to try to stop any one of them with a vaccine. “When pharma companies look at it, it’s not as attractive as other things they could work on,” says Ransohoff. “So it hasn’t attracted the resources.”

[…] The project takes inspiration from efforts to fight the covid-19 virus, where Veesler’s group was among those involved in the speedy development of vaccines, antiviral drugs, and antibodies. According to Ransohoff, Intercept’s advisors will include Peter Marks, a former top FDA official, as well as Moncef Slaoui, the pharmaceutical executive who led the US coronavirus vaccine effort, Operation Warp Speed. A key challenge for Intercept will be coming up with ways to counter many viruses at one time. That accounts for the interest in air-cleaning technology, such as using strong ultraviolet light to inactivate viruses. The idea, the group says, is to remove them from the air in the same way municipalities remove impurities from the water supply before it’s piped to people’s homes.

Just pay your damn taxes

By crmarvin42 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Seriously, I am sick of these vanity charity projects. Just pay your fair share of taxes, and let us, collectively, decide on our priorities. Because this shit will not be evenly applied, and considering the popularity of a antivax beliefs, and the level of international travel, it his will simply not work without a global commitment. And as bad as the cold and flu can be, there are kids who are going into debt with their school over getting breakfast.

Re:Just pay your damn taxes

By Required Snark • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
How about basic affordable health care for all by making the billionaire class pay some reasonable tax rate? Instant increase in well being along with eventual increased life span. No medical breakthrough required.

Re:Backfire

By dargaud • Score: 5, Informative Thread
Because many professionals don’t work for those that try to sell you something. Most epidemiologists or virologues or others actually work for research centers or non-gov entities and have no money in the game. So yes, I’d trust a WHO epidemiologist any day over someone trying to sell me an “instant flu nasal spray vaccine” or similar; but if they say those work, why not…

Re:Backfire

By Powercntrl • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Today when they’re programming our own cells to create parts of real viruses…

Tell me you don’t understand how viruses reproduce naturally without telling me you don’t understand how viruses reproduce naturally.

Re:Backfire

By Rei • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Seriously. It will raise a generation who will drop down dead if they catch a cold.

That’s not how this works. Common misunderstanding.

yet we’re supposed to believe that our immune system is a piece of junk which can’t deal with a few viruses by itself.

It’s great that you’re so proud of your immune system - and you should be, it’s amazing! Now, if I handed you a vial of serum from an ebola patient, would you rub it all over yourself, because “You Have An Immune System!”?

Do you understand that the way that the innate immune system attacks pathogens is by attacking / disregulating your body, and that this is harmful? You know how much everyone (rightly) hates “inflammation” and the harm it does? That’s what inflammation is, it’s the activity of the innate immune system.

Do you understand that viruses have evolved specifically to disregulate the body in order to avoid the immune system, that this disregulation is commonly scattershot rather than focused, and its impacts may or may not go away immediately - or in some cases, even ever - after infection? And that some viruses undergo long-term persistent states in the body?

Do you understand how associated viruses are with sequelae (do you understand what sequelae are)? As a random example, read the second paragraph of this article. And that’s just the start.

Do you understand how common autoimmune disease is, and that it most commonly develops as a result to antigen exposure, such as during infection? That frequent and severe inflammation encourages autoimmune disease, and can even cause cancer (repairing inflammatory and viral damage requires cell replication, and the replications that occur as part of the immune response itself can specifically lead to lymphoma)?

No, getting sick is not harmless just because you “got better”. Sorry.

Slate Auto’s Radically Simple Electric Truck Starts At $24,950

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Slate Auto says its stripped-down electric pickup will start at $24,950 before fees, with the base model’s estimated range increased from 150 to about 205 miles. The company has started taking preorders on Wednesday. “The aggressive pricing — half the average cost of a new car in the United States — puts Slate in position to capture a share of the lowest end of the new car market, which has few gas and fewer electric options these days,” reports TechCrunch. From the report:
The price reveal comes more than a year after Slate Auto emerged from stealth. Since then, the company has been steadily detailing the extremely basic, transforming EV, which starts as a two-seater pickup truck, but can be modified into a five-seater SUV. The SUV version will start at $29,950, Slate said Wednesday. Slate has said the conversion can be done by professionals or by owners themselves. On Wednesday, it finally showed off some of the first of its “Slate University” how-to videos, which guide people through the steps for doing everything from the SUV conversion to adding headlight covers.

Everything else about the truck is bare, though it’s customizable. It has hand-crank windows, lacks an infotainment system, and all orders start with the same gray composite material, with no paint options, as Slate plans to let buyers order customizable wraps for the vehicle. That likely helps cut out a major cost center, as factory paint shops can run in the hundreds of millions of dollars. The company did not offer more details about the buying process. Slate has said it “won’t have traditional dealerships,” and plans to sell directly to customers, similar to other EV companies like Tesla, Rivian, and Lucid Motors.

Pony up

By Anonymous Coward • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Everyone bitching and moaning over too much spyware and nanny electronics here is what you asked for.

Re:Pony up

By Sauce Tin • Score: 5, Informative Thread
Just to reiterate: There are no luxury options, you’d have to buy and install those components yourself. This is the base model.

Re:Pony up

By Himmy32 • Score: 5, Informative Thread

this vehicle has all the luxury options too

All would be overstating it, the “luxury items” are mostly just decorative. Electric windows, electric adjustable rearview mirrors, heated seats, heated steering wheel, smart cruise control, lane change notification/assistance, automated parking, sun roof or a whole bevy of what people might consider luxury features are not available.

But it’s not lacking in some “luxury” lighting and visual doodads that seem inspired by MTV’s Pimp My Ride though.

After having a GMC S15 in the 90’s that I loved, I was hoping for decent small electric pickup. Some amount of barebones I could handle like the tablet over an infotainment unit, but it’s a couple steps past barebones.

Re:Customization more important than price

By drinkypoo • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

These are not actually going to be much more customizable than other vehicles. The sole exception is in the infotainment department, where virtually all modern vehicles have some big overwrought thing that you probably don’t want because it sucks, or it will in the future — which will affect you if you’re the kind of person who keeps a vehicle. But if you are, the auto industry hates you.

A vehicle being “designed” to be customized is really entirely irrelevant because all of the same work has to be done in order to do that customization. There are “upfitter guides” for all of the vehicles you’d commonly expect to customize, especially vans and pickups, which help with that. I’ve used these to aid in doing solar installs in RV conversions. That is, any pickup you’d buy is already designed to be customized.

In order for there to be a significant aftermarket for parts for a vehicle, those vehicles have to be numerous. Then companies find it worthwhile to make seat install kits and such. Such things aren’t generally complicated, so the modularity is really very overblown overall.

I do think the Slate concept has legs, but it’s in the low price and ease of repair areas, and not at all in the customization department, which simply doesn’t matter.

Re:Pony up

By BeaverCleaver • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Called it. Buy a sedan then.

Is there barebones electric sedan for sale in the USA? I’m completely fine with hand-cranked windows, and I’d rather have a couple of analog gauges than a giant tablet in the dash. I don’t need climate control, just a couple of dumb buttons for hot, cold and fan.

Meta Pauses Employee-Tracking Program Following Internal Data Leak

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Meta has paused its Model Compatibility Initiative that tracked employee mouse movements, clicks, keystrokes, and screen content to train AI agents, after some of its collected data became accessible to more employees than intended. Meta says it has no evidence the information was improperly accessed and will not restart the program until it is confident in its safeguards. Wired reports:
Meta rolled out the Model Compatibility Initiative (MCI) tool in April to US employees. The tool “collects computer inputs such as mouse movements, click locations and keystrokes, as well as screen content,” according to workers who have been petitioning against it over privacy, security, and personal liberty concerns. When MCI launched, employees couldn’t opt out, but that changed to a limited degree after workers protested. Meta executives have repeatedly defended the data-gathering project, saying it was necessary to train AI systems to operate computer software the way humans do and that employees were the best examples for the artificial intelligence to learn from.

On Monday, a Meta engineer issued an internal security notice stating that databases filled with information gathered by MCI had been exposed to anyone inside the company. A former employee actively involved in pushing back against MCI describes the lapse as “a mess” — and one that employees had expected would occur. “When workers raised concerns, leadership doubled down and failed to acknowledge the risks workers raised about the safety and privacy of worker and customer data,” the person says. “Leadership has clearly created an authoritarian environment where workers are no longer respected or heard.”

But after critical comments poured into internal forums on Monday expressing frustration about the security issue, Meta shocked some of its staff by pausing MCI altogether, telling WIRED about the development several hours before announcing it to employees. A few workers told WIRED they were confused in the meantime because the tool was continuing to run on their laptops. Late on Monday, Stephane Kasriel, a Meta vice president overseeing AI research, announced the pause and told staff that the security issue had been discovered on June 18 and addressed within four hours. But the initial fix didn’t stick and access to the data had to be further locked down. The issue made “some MCI-derived data” accessible to more people than intended, he wrote, without elaborating.

Spotlight Accountability.

By geekmux • Score: 3 Thread

Meta has paused its Model Compatibility Initiative..after some of its collected data became accessible to more employees than intended.

When a candle is all that is needed to put a spotlight on your behavior to change it, it says a lot about your fucking behavior.

Those are supposed to be valued employees. Not suspects.

Re:Spotlight Accountability.

By ambrandt12 • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Yeah… you’re supposed to think you’re a “valued employee”… the company couldn’t give a *i*s less about you.

And, working for a company like that, you should be expecting nothing less than replacement, at some point.

There’s no such thing as a ‘valued employee’… just an expendable nobody.

Old joke, bad business practice

By gurps_npc • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Cop sees a guy at midnight on his hands and knees looking under a street light. Asks him “What are you doing?”

Guy says “Looking for my car keys.”

Cops help him look for a while and then asks “Are you sure you dropped them here?”

Guy replies “No, I dropped them over there in the dark but there is no chance at all I could find them there, it is too dark.”

When you track things, you think you make decisions/rules based on what you track. But you can’t really track the good stuff like effectiveness, creativity, or intelligence. Mouse clicks, key strokes etc. are what they track, so they build their AI on that stuff.

It’s no different than looking under the street light - you won’t find what you want, just the stuff that is easy to find.

This kind of thing is an unnecessary invasion of privacy that will result in an AI copying the mistakes of humans, not their best behavior.

Re:Old joke, bad business practice

By allo • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

You can detect who’s taking a break, though. But tracking IT worker productivity by activity time is as useless as using meters of mouse movement. The productive part is not typing the actual code, but thinking about it. And this may involve you sitting in front of the machine not touching any part of it, or taking a walk in the park being “unproductive” while thinking about the solution.

Most weirdest fcuked up company in history

By butt0nm4n • Score: 3 Thread

Sorry for any soul who has to work there. Creepy as creepy can get.

Not the last of the boggling paradoxes that these champions of capitalism and liberty end up running their companies like an authoritarian state.

Nope, nope, nope.

GTA VI Is a Worrying Sign For the Future of Physical Games

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot
Rockstar Games has revealed the price of Grand Theft Auto VI to be $79.99, and confirmed that the physical versions of the game won’t include a disc. Instead, they’ll contain a one-time download code when it launches November 19. “Not only is that a disappointing decision for people who like to own physical games, but given the scale of the next GTA, it also sets a bad precedent for the rest of the industry,” reports The Verge. From the report:
There are a lot of advantages to buying digital. You can start a download from your couch. You can store multiple games on one hard drive so you don’t have to get up to play something else. Storefronts like Steam or the PlayStation Store don’t run out of inventory of the newest game you’re interested in, and you can often get games at a cheaper price thanks to frequent sales.

But it’s becoming increasingly clear that digital ownership has significant disadvantages, too. If a game you don’t own digitally is removed from a storefront, whether that’s for things like licensing, artificially limited availability, or even the store eventually closing down, your only option is to hope you can find a physical version. If your account on a platform is banned, even if that ban isn’t warranted, you might be locked out of your digital library with no way to play those games unless you buy them again or hope your account gets restored. You can’t sell or trade digital games you’ve purchased, and while there are ways to share digital games, they require some work and are usually intended just for families.

It’s also much harder to preserve digital games because they only “exist” on the hard drive of a console, PC, or device they were downloaded to. This is an issue across many industries, not just console games; there are multiple examples of things like mobile games and streaming shows becoming lost for good when they don’t have a physical version. Without physical versions, you also can’t find a used version of a game at a garage sale or a local game shop.
It’s unclear whether Rockstar will ever release a physical version of the game. As for why, The Verge suspects the decision was made in part to prevent leaks; “by only being available digitally, Rockstar can ensure that GTA VI unlocks at the same exact time for everyone.”
“The digital-only choice might also indicate that the game has a massive file size that’s too big for PlayStation and Xbox game discs.”

If you buy it, you’re paying to get screwed

By PenisLands • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
If buying isn’t owning, piracy isn’t stealing.

Don’t buy it…

By jefftp • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I know this may come as a shock, but the answer is simply to not buy it.

New?

By Moof123 • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

I mean GTA V was unplayable with just the disc. Many games in the last decade have not been playable without a MASSIVE download once you popped the disc in, and these days most “Gaming” PC’s don’t have a slot for a disc of any sort anyway.

GOG

By RitchCraft • Score: 3 Thread

I just wait for the GOG release of any game I may be interested in. If it doesn’t ever show up at GOG, oh well, I simply don’t need to play that game then.

“A” physical disk?

By BoogieChile • Score: 3 Thread
> “The digital-only choice might also indicate that the game has a massive file size that’s too big for PlayStation and Xbox game discs.”

Gee, do ya think? GTA 5 Enhanced takes up 96 GB on my PC. I don’t imagine GTA 6 is going to be smaller, somehow.