Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Supreme Court Lets Vermont’s Meta Lawsuit Proceed, Opening Door To 50-State Legal Wave
  2. FBI Arrests CIA Official With $40 Million In Gold Bars In His Home
  3. NASA Details Its Plan to Build a Lunar Base At the Moon’s South Pole
  4. MIT Researchers Develop a Low-Cost Technique To Get Lithium Out of Rocks
  5. Europe Told To Cool Its Datacenter Boom Before Water, Power Run Short
  6. Anthropic Releases Opus 4.8 With New ‘Dynamic Workflow’ Tool
  7. Occupy Wall Street Co-Founder Built an On-Device AI For Activists
  8. Trump Loses More Control Over AI Regulation As Illinois Passes Landmark Law
  9. Valve’s Steam Deck Sells Out Again, Even After 40% Price Increase
  10. Microsoft Allegedly Leaked Dutch Civil Servants’ Data To the US
  11. IBM, Red Hat Commit $5 Billion To Secure Open Source Supply Chains
  12. Robinhood Now Lets Your AI Agents Trade Stocks
  13. DOJ Charges Google Employee With $1.2 Million Polymarket Bet On Search Term
  14. Last.fm Goes Independent After Breaking Up With Paramount Skydance
  15. Perfect Randomness Realized For the First Time

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Supreme Court Lets Vermont’s Meta Lawsuit Proceed, Opening Door To 50-State Legal Wave

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Fortune:
The Supreme Court on Tuesday rejected a push to avoid a lawsuit alleging that Facebook and Instagram harmed young users, a decision that comes as social media companies increasingly face legal scrutiny. Parent company Meta appealed after Vermont’s highest court allowed a suit filed by its attorney general in 2023 to move forward. The company is facing similar lawsuits from states across the country, accusing it of knowingly designing addictive features. Meta had argued that it can’t be sued in Vermont court because neither the company nor the app design has specific ties to the state. Vermont countered that the sites’ large number of teen users gives its courts jurisdiction.

The Supreme Court declined to hear the appeal in a brief, unexplained order, as is typical. The procedural decision comes after court losses for Meta and YouTube in social media addiction lawsuits in California and New Mexico. […] Meta, for its part, has said that it has already introduced dozens of tools to support teens and their families and suggested it would have worked with the states on standards for youth social media use. Vermont Attorney General Charity Clark applauded the decision, saying it affirms “that companies that choose to do business in Vermont, like Meta, can be held accountable when they harm kids.”

The algorithm is designed to maximize profit

By Locke2005 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
The fact that the algorithm harms people is an inconsequential side effect.

Re:Good

By Locke2005 • Score: 5, Informative Thread
“In its most recent Q1 2026 earnings report, Meta’s Reality Labs division posted an operating loss of $4.03 billion on $402 million in revenue.Since late 2020, the unit—which develops VR headsets, AR smart glasses, and metaverse software—has accumulated over $80 billion in total operating losses.”

Does that make you feel any better? Zuck renamed to company for something that has cost them $80 billion in losses… so far.

Blaming Meta is like…

By MpVpRb • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Blaming drug dealers for addiction.
The root cause of the harm attributed to social media is the weaknesses in human nature.
The social media companies didn’t create the weaknesses, they exploited them.
Advertisers and politicians have been doing this for years.
People are far too easy to manipulate.

Re:Blaming Meta is like…

By dskoll • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The analogy is not quite right. Meta are not analogous to drug dealers. They are analogous to drug designers who tweak the formula to make it as addictive as possible, ignoring any harms.

And yes, a cause is human weakness, but the cause is the deliberate, widespread exploitation of that weakness in ways that are very harmful to both individuals and to society.

Re:Blaming Meta is like…

By OrangeTide • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

If society is harmed by people that exploit people’s weakness. Then why shouldn’t we band together to restrict such activities?
What’s the point of being in a society if not for mutual benefit, including protection?

If weakness included not locking your door, then by extension we shouldn’t prosecute burglars. Obviously nonsense.

Nobody forced Meta or advertisers to hack the human mind in order to extract what they wanted from them. And demanding personal responsibility from children and the elderly is nonsense, like squeezing blood from a stone. People’s susceptibility to being manipulated isn’t going to go away just because you think they are weak-minded.

FBI Arrests CIA Official With $40 Million In Gold Bars In His Home

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
A senior CIA official, David Rush, was arrested after investigators found more than $40 million in gold bars and about $2 million in cash at his Virginia home. According to the New York Times, “The only charge lodged against David Rush is that he inflated his academic credentials and obtained military leave pay worth tens of thousands of dollars.” From the report:
The court papers describe Mr. Rush as a “former senior executive service-level employee at a United States government agency.” People familiar with the investigation say he until very recently held a senior position at the C.I.A. In a joint statement, the C.I.A. and F.B.I. said the arrest occurred on May 19, after the agency alerted the bureau. “After a C.I.A. internal investigation identified potential violations of the law, C.I.A. Director John Ratcliffe referred the information to the F.B.I. for a law enforcement investigation,” the statement said.

From last November to March, the court papers say, Mr. Rush asked for, and received, “a significant quantity of foreign currency and tens of millions of dollars in gold bars for work-related expenses.” When the C.I.A. conducted a review of where the gold and currency were stashed, the agency was “unable to locate the gold bars or significant amounts of the foreign currency,” according to court papers.

On May 18, F.B.I. agents searched Mr. Rush’s home and found “approximately 303 gold bars, each of which weighed approximately one kilogram,” according to an affidavit. Based on the price of gold, the affidavit said, the estimated value of the gold exceeded $40 million. Investigators also seized nearly three dozen luxury watches, many of them Rolexes. The court papers do not indicate why Mr. Rush appears to have kept so much gold, and $2 million in U.S. currency, in his home, or what work project would have required him to amass such wealth.

Re:Why was original post modded ???

By DarkOx • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

This isn’t just taking shortcuts though this wholesale negligence.

Once in a while you hear such and such President/CEO of ACME never really graduated from Some Small University. They lied to get past the HR gate got hired as manager or director of Widget production 15 years ago where they were not an officer not responsible for signature on public records etc, later got promoted and nobody went back and checked up on stuff.

This though, the claims this guy made were shall we say rather remarkable for such a short career, service in multiple military branches, a graduate degree, pilot, managing a lot of people, etc.. A bunch of things that should have said to anyone reading the resume, this sounds perhaps a little puffed up, maybe I should check on SOME of this stuff which should have produced a few easily obtained artifacts. Obviously zero effort was made to verify any of it. Clearly nobody did any DD here not the hiring manager, not OMB..

I can’t say I have run down every line on every CV of everyone I have hired but I usually at least go, ok says he was such and such at XYZ corp, lets look their about-us page on wayback machine, ok there is a picture of him a title that is near enough…so that checks.. oh he is a licensed PI, ok I can check the states website for that.. Then you just consider the claims, like ok says he graduated in 2000 and in 2003 was president of XYZ corp, again you check out XYZ oh fine it looks like they have about 4 employees and rented office in suburban Cincinnati; whatever, on the other hand if it is a 4000+ people and they have a XYZ Parkway named after them, you pick the phone and check that out.

uh

By drinkypoo • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

From last November to March, the court papers say, Mr. Rush asked for, and received, “a significant quantity of foreign currency and tens of millions of dollars in gold bars for work-related expenses.”

The problem with the CIA is not necessarily that they exist, but that they apparently operate without oversight. What the fuck is this?

Re:Pardon.

By ArchieBunker • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Then it clearly hasn’t worked.

Re: Gold bars you say?

By DarkOx • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

the answer to that one is actually kind of obvious, IMHO where do put large number of gold bars that does not result in people asking a lot of questions?

Safety deposit boxes? - I guess if spread it around enough separate banks, you have some privacy accessing the box (usually) but you still are not the only one handling it, gold is very very put much of it a given box and it might raise questions. One nosy bank manager might become a real problem quickly.

Bury it in the woods? - That works unless someone finds it, how undisturbed can make the local landscape appear? Did anyone say a local sheriff, game warden, etc get curious about that pickup beside the road?

Even transport carries a lot of risk, - what if you get pulled over, and an over zealous officer decides to search the car? Sure legally you might be able to get the discovery excluded from evidence but you’re not getting the gold back..

Given it someone else? - Who do you that both won’t ask questions, is dishonest enough to help you do something they reasonably can guess isn’t on the up and up, and also trusty worthy enough to not help themselves?

40 million in gold without some documentation as to why you have it is rather a problem. Even you hammered it into look alikes of 17th century Spanish coins and claimed you found it diving off the Florida keys, a whole lot of entities are going to show up asking questions and asserting it should be theirs, just look what Mel Fisher went thru!

Re:Ordering $40 million in gold bars on expences :

By Frank Burly • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
Looking at America today, who can blame him?

NASA Details Its Plan to Build a Lunar Base At the Moon’s South Pole

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
NASA has outlined a three-phase plan to build a lunar base at the moon’s south pole. The first phase, from 2026 to 2029, will focus on robotic missions, landers, rovers, reactors, satellites, and Blue Origin’s Blue Moon Mark 1 Endurance test. Later phases will add habitats, power systems, communications, cargo logistics, and rotating crews. Wired reports:
According to a recent press conference, phase one will be particularly active: at least 25 missions and 21 surface landings. Without detailing specific dates, the agency said that over the next three years it will send rovers, including manned models for future mobility, drones, surface reactors, new-generation satellites, and payloads to prepare the ground.

One of the first key missions will be the test of the Blue Moon Mark 1 Endurance module in fall 2026. Its purpose is to evaluate conditions for a controlled descent and validate navigation and positioning technology. It will not carry astronauts. If the mission is successful, Blue Origin plans a manned version around 2028, possibly with Blue Moon Mark 2. Moon Base II and III missions are also part of the program’s 2026 startup. One will send rovers and payloads to evaluate more complex rover operations; the other will carry scientific instruments to study the behavior of materials and systems under extreme lunar conditions.

Phase two, starting in 2029, marks the beginning of semipermanent infrastructure assembly and first occupancy operations. NASA plans to install advanced energy systems, including surface reactors, initial habitat elements, and more robust communication networks. Up to 60 tons of cargo will be delivered in 24 missions during this period.

Phase three is for scale-up. The infrastructure in place will be strengthened and expanded to form durable centers with constant turnover of personnel. NASA envisions a lunar south pole with habitable modules, reliable power systems, logistics networks for cargo and crew transportation, and the shipment of about 38 tons of cargo annually for maintenance and expansion.
“Every mission, crewed and uncrewed, will be a learning opportunity as we return to the lunar surface, build the infrastructure to stay, and master the skills required to live and operate in one of the most demanding and dangerous environments imaginable,” said administrator Jared Isaacman in a NASA statement. “We will go for the science, for all we stand to gain from an economic and technological perspective, for the innovations that will make life better here on Earth, and to prepare for where we will inevitably go next.”

Why do we need a giant publicly funded moon base?

By Morromist • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Is… is this just a way to give musk & bezos even more goverment money?

I’m beginning to get a little suspicious.

Re:Drones?

By LoadLin • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I think they are naming “drones” just multipurpose rovers. Not flying drones, but rovers dedicated to menial tasks.

Re:Why do we need a giant publicly funded moon bas

By satanicat • Score: 4, Funny Thread

eventually… theme park?

Re:We’ve operated drones on mars

By nospam007 • Score: 5, Informative Thread

" We’ve operated drones on mars, typically calling them rovers.”

We have ALSO operated a flying drone on Mars.

It was called Ingenuity.
It hitched a ride on the Perseverance rover and was originally meant as a 30-day tech demo with 5 flights. It massively exceeded expectations.
Final stats:

72 flights total, from April 19, 2021 to January 18, 2024
Total distance flown: 11 miles (about 17.7 km)
Total time in the air: 128.8 minutes
Maximum altitude: 79 feet (24 meters) on Flight 61
Maximum speed: 22.4 mph (10 m/s), reached during Flights 62, 68, and 69

It ended when one of its carbon fiber rotor blades was damaged during landing on its final flight, likely from striking the ground.

Re: Why do we need a giant publicly funded moon ba

By AmiMoJo • Score: 4, Informative Thread

IIRC Kennedy originally wanted to do something spectacular to show the world how advanced the US was, and things like desalinating water were considered. But he also wanted to improve relations with the USSR, and when he proposed going to the moon he then started putting forward the idea of a joint mission.

It was still in the early stages when he was assassinated, so the mission profile hadn’t been decided upon and most people were expecting there to be a moon orbit rendezvous between a crew capsule and lander launched separately. So the thought was that the US and USSR could send their own crew capsules, and then both board a joint lander, and go down together. Presumably they would have had to figure out how to have an astronaut and cosmonaut step onto the surface at the same time.

So it was a dick measuring contest, but there was also the possibility of it fostering cooperation. Shame it didn’t happen until Apollo/Soyuz.

MIT Researchers Develop a Low-Cost Technique To Get Lithium Out of Rocks

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from MIT News:
Currently, lithium hard rock extraction involves baking the rock at over 1,000 Celsius and chemically leaching it to extract lithium. The rest of the rock is discarded. Now, a team of researchers from MIT and elsewhere has developed a low-temperature process for extracting battery-grade lithium from the most common type of lithium-bearing mineral. The process uses a liquid reagent to dissolve the rock into the useful forms of its constituent parts: not just battery-ready lithium salts, but also smelter-grade alumina and cement-ready silica. After the minerals are extracted, the solvent and reagent can be recovered and used again so waste levels approach zero. The researchers estimate the closed-loop process is half the cost of traditional lithium hard rock extraction and could make it cost-competitive with extracting lithium from brine water.
“We believe this approach is the lowest-energy, lowest-cost way of getting lithium not only out of hard rock, but period,” says Yet-Ming Chiang, MIT’s Kyocera Professor of Materials Science and Engineering. “That’s what’s motivating us to scale this. It will enable the energy transition through batteries that use lithium. This was one of the goals of The Climate Project at MIT — to work on projects that, within a short number of years, could transition from the lab to commercialization and impact.”
A paper describing the process has been published in the journal Science.

Lithium isn’t rare, and it is important

By locater16 • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
There’s a lot of papers, many which appear here on /., talking up alternative non lithium battery chemistries because “they’re cheaper”. The assumption often is that lithium is somehow rare. It’s really not, there’s already lithium reserves for decade after decade of battery production at much larger scales than now. The thing is that’s it’s just not lithium cheaply accessible via today’s mining and processing technologies, at least by those already in well established use. And we want lithium, lithium is inherently a very good battery material, being the lightest atomic weight metal there is. In theory it could be stretched to the same energy density as rocket and jet fuel (yes this means EV planes). But all that lithium stuck bound up to rocks needs to be cheap, and so that’s why we research like in this article.

Re:Lithium isn’t rare, and it is important

By upuv • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

It’s accepted that Lithium is not rare.

There are however 3 big issues.
1. Cost and Toxic waste associated with extraction. ( This article shows progress in this regard. )
2. Stability, Lithium batteries have an issue with nasty fires.
3. Density of viable lithium related ores. EG in the west most lithium ore is from 2 areas. Canada and Australia. Both locations are actually rather remote in each country.

Lithium is not a good battery base. Why? It’s not stable. Energy density is pretty good. But as we know when you push the limits you can get issues. Samsung did this with a series of phone batteries. They ended up with a lot of fires and a very expensive recall. So something that is energy dense but has a significant risk the health and life. It no longer is a good option for batteries.

For reasons like this lithium will ultimately be deposed as the king of batteries.

That said this process is welcome. As it has a dramatic reduction in toxic residuals from processing. So this is a major plus.

Re:Lithium isn’t rare, and it is important

By shilly • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Other chemistries are not “cheaper” than lithium. They’re cheaper without the quote marks. Sodium is 300x cheaper than lithium, because it’s vastly more abundant (neither are rare, but abundance matters), cheap and easy to extract and obtain at gigantic commodity scales, and can be purified to the requisite standards for EV chemistries more easily. It’s the frickin salt industry! Humanity has been trading it for thousands of years.

Sodium chemistries also have their own benefits over lithium for EVs beyond cost: cold weather performance, cycle life, and ability to discharge to zero. Lithium will continue to be wildly important for decades, but the advent of new chemistries is wonderful news.

Finally, Lithium-free rocks !

By greytree • Score: 3 Thread
To be honest, I didn’t even know Lithium was bad for you.

Re: But will this process get investment?

By cmseagle • Score: 5, Informative Thread
“Other” rare earths? Lithium is an alkali metal, not a rare earth.

Europe Told To Cool Its Datacenter Boom Before Water, Power Run Short

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
A new Grundfos report warns that Europe’s datacenter boom could strain water supplies and power grids unless regulators bake water and energy efficiency into planning, reporting, and incentives for new facilities. The Register reports:
According to the report, the EU-wide server farm IT load is about 10 GW today, and is expected to rise to 35 GW by 2030 — just four years away. These facilities account for about 3 percent of all electricity consumption now, but this is projected to hit 7-9 percent by the end of the decade. Water and energy are intertwined in cooling systems. Grundfos claims that cooling infrastructure accounts for a substantial share of a datacenter’s resource use, representing about 38 percent of total electricity consumption in an average facility, while water demand in large hyperscale facilities can reach 11,356 to 18,927 cubic meters per day — enough for up to 155,000 EU households.

Rapid growth in bit barns is placing increased pressure on energy systems, water resources and local infrastructure, the report notes. Without careful coordination, inefficient or poorly sited facilities risk exacerbating these problems and triggering public opposition. […] Grundfos advises regulators to integrate water efficiency and cooling design requirements directly into planning approvals for new facilities and any large-scale expansions to encourage adoption of efficient cooling technologies. It also advocates investment incentives from governments such as tax credits, green financing mechanisms, and grant programs for technologies that demonstrably reduce energy and water consumption. Integration between server halls and district heating networks is another aspect worth consideration, the report adds.

Grundfos?

By UsuallyReasonable • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Who in fuck is Grundfos?

“Grundfos is a global leader in advanced pump and water solutions, renowned for its highly efficient, reliable, and sustainable pumping systems.”

Ah.

Re:Grundfos?

By dgatwood • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Why does your water heater need a pump?

Instead of having your hot water fan out in a tree, you wire it like a token ring with a return pipe, where each faucet only has a short bit of pipe between it and the ring. Then, you have a pump to circulate hot water through the ring-shaped pipe network. That way, it takes half a second to get hot water instead of half a minute or more.

Re:Grundfos?

By thegarbz • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Having a product to sell doesn’t make them wrong. There are multiple energy grids across Europe that are completely overloaded. There are multiple water supplies including ground water that are massively under strain.

And when I say overloaded I mean in some places there are even proposals to use the mobile phone emergency alert message to ask consumers to shed loads (e.g. unplug cars, stop their washing machines, etc). https://www.rtvutrecht.nl/nieu… (in Dutch). In Germany the HV grid is under such strain that at some time the price of electricity dips negative in one province only for it to spike in another. Only 12 hours ago Truin was in a complete blackout as Italy’s power system was unable to cope with the load of everyone’s AC units. There are massive anticipated water supply shortages looming in Spain, France, and even the god damn Netherlands where it rains 364.5 days a year (bit of a joke but not far off).

While it’s always healthy to have a bit of scepticism whenever someone has a solution to sell you, one shouldn’t turn off their brain entirely and dismiss the claim outright. .

Re: Grundfos?

By Smidge204 • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

If your pump is loud, you need a new one. One that is properly sized. It should be somewhere between “are you sure it’s even working?” quiet to barely audible if you’re in the same room with no other source of noise.

Should probably also only be like 100 watts or so at most.
=Smidge=

Techies planning Utilities is a Disaster

By SmaryJerry • Score: 3 Thread
The utility companies need to be the ones managing water and electricity production and distribution, not tech companies. It’s far more efficient for competition in the industry to cause additional production of water and electricity when high demand (and a profit motive) exists. Instead it is likely that Europe will go communist or socialist with it and require datacenters to plan to produce or reduce their own electricity and water, as many left leaning cities and states in the US are doing. The problem is you are going to get the least efficient producers of water and electricity in the world because people entirely outside of the industry will have to produce their own - causing it to cost more and be more wasteful to produce the same amount. Additionally you will see standards set by people who don’t even know how a server works placing restrictions based on energy efficiency targets instead of effectiveness targets - again actually causing the exact issue they want to prevent.

Anthropic Releases Opus 4.8 With New ‘Dynamic Workflow’ Tool

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Anthropic has released Claude Opus 4.8 with stronger performance and better handling of uncertain or flawed data, including a greater tendency to flag issues rather than make unsupported claims. The update also introduces a “Dynamic Workflows” research preview for coordinating complex tasks across many subagents. TechCrunch reports:
Opus 4.8 comes with the expected best-in-class benchmark results, but there’s also particular attention to how the model manages bad or uncertain data. In the launch post, Anthropic’s early testers found that the new model is “more likely to flag uncertainties about its work and less likely to make unsupported claims.” Echoing this point, a testimonial from Bridgewater associates said the biggest difference in the upgrade was “Opus 4.8’s tendency to proactively flag issues with the inputs and outputs of an analysis, something other models routinely missed and left to the users to catch.”

Together with the new model, Anthropic launched a feature called Dynamic Workflows, which will be available in research preview. The system is designed to help larger models like Opus manage complex tasks across hundreds of parallel subagents. “Claude Code alongside Opus 4.8 can now carry out codebase-scale migrations across hundreds of thousands of lines of code from kickoff to merge, with the existing test suite as its bar,” the post explains.
As for Mythos, Anthropic’s most advanced model, the company hinted it could be made publicly available in the not too distant future. “We’re making swift progress on developing these safeguards and expect to be able to bring Mythos-class models to all our customers in the coming weeks,” the company wrote.

Mass code migrations are full of risk

By Tony Isaac • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

A big reason we write code in small chunks, is so we can review the changes and be sure it works as expected. Bulk-testing a large project automatically converted by *any* tool, AI or otherwise, is bound to have a million unexpected issues that are impossible to test, because there are too many scenarios to cover.

Wholesale migrations is never a good idea, if risk matters.

Ok I’m now interested

By liqu1d • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
If it can go “I don’t know” rather than spew bollocks as fact it may actually be the turning point for AI that would get me to use it. At least for stuff I don’t already know about already. Will have to try with things the previous one claimed to know despite being provably wrong.

Occupy Wall Street Co-Founder Built an On-Device AI For Activists

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Gizmodo:
In an era where Silicon Valley’s conservatism is both expressed openly and becoming more intense by the day, it’s strange to think that tech was once seen as a hive of liberalism. The right-wing nature of today’s tech industry means that its products tend to also be seen as serving right-wing interests, either in their actual operation (like X’s openly and unrepentantly right-wing chatbot Grok) or by the simple fact that their existence serves to enrich a small group of very powerful, very conservative people.

But does it have to be this way? Can LLMs and AI agents find a place in the toolkit of progressive activist groups? The conviction that they can is the idea behind a new app called Outcry, which provides a chatbot designed specifically as a “private, on-device AI mentor for activists, organizers and movement builders.” (There’s also a web version, although it obviously lacks the privacy benefits of being entirely offline.) It’s the brainchild of Occupy Wall Street co-creator Micah White, who recently wrote a blog post about the thinking behind the project.

[…] Outcry’s other distinguishing feature is that its dataset is entirely offline — it’s included with the download. According to the readme, the entire dataset is downloaded to your device at first launch, and stored in your library’s Application Support directory.
So, how effectively does Outcry serve as a guide for collective action? “I’d say that its information is pretty high-level and general, not least because its offline nature prevents it from accessing specific details not contained in its database,” writes Gizmodo’s Tom Hawking.
He continued: “This app has the potential to be a really valuable resource, especially for people who are just beginning to become involved with activism and genuinely don’t know where to begin — and getting over that first step can be hard.”

Re:Tech industry is right wing?

By abulafia • Score: 4, Informative Thread
Tech leadership of large firms has been pretty quick to lick the orange anus.

Musk, Cook, Zuckerborg, Altman, Brin, Ellison, Catz, Brockman, Pichai, Nadella, and more that I’m forgetting all have Trump-ass on their breath.

There are a few who seem to prefer democracy, but if you can name a technology company leader of a non-trivial firm that publicly supports the goals of OWS types, please name them - I can’t.

Re:Tech industry is right wing?

By Himmy32 • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

That article on the realignment is calling out events like the inauguration or deals with the current administration.

Grok would even be happy to photoshop you into a swastika bikini to prove how anti-woke it is. And Palantir can protect us from Greta Thunberg as the Antichrist.

So yeah, undoubtedly big companies will sway with which ever way the power and money comes. But there’s one party in power now and even the conservative media is documenting the current sway.

SV isn’t conservative

By hdyoung • Score: 3 Thread
SV is hard-core capitalist. They always were, and always will be. Maybe also a bit libertarian, but pretty socially liberal. Capitalism and conservatism are two different things. Actually, conservatism and right-wingism are also two distinct things. A few of the trillionaire class are right-wing (Musk and Thiel), but I can’t think of a single one that I would actually consider conservative.

local private tools are good

By rta • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Just over the past 15 years in the US we’ve seen government overreach and “tyranny” from both Dems and Republicans.

in Europe, even the UK , they send you to jail for “hate speech”. and they’re proud of it, and want to do it more.

I have my views on which side’s excess have been scarier or worse in the short term and long term, but either way it’s pretty clear that any freedom oriented person should fight for the existence of private offline tools.

This is literal 1984 stuff. like imagine if your notebook literally won’t allow you to write “kill all x” or “let’s ban y”, “let’s legalize y”
we’re already there with public LLM’s on some topics.

And for everything online it’s ever changing just like 1984… a path of thought you explored last year you can’t anymore, ( or you get reported/dissuaded) because the social winds have shifted.

Basically Winston’s job is no longer even necessary since with cloud everything can be censored real-time.

Re: Tech industry is right wing?

By broward • Score: 4, Informative Thread

all of social media installed Biden’s FBI censors. how quickly they forget.

Trump Loses More Control Over AI Regulation As Illinois Passes Landmark Law

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Illinois lawmakers on Wednesday passed a landmark AI safety bill (SB 315) that would require major AI companies to publish safety plans, submit annual third-party testing reports, report serious incidents quickly, and protect whistleblowers who flag emerging risks. OpenAI and Anthropic supported the bill, which could make Illinois a testing ground for state-level AI governance as federal regulation remains stalled. Ars Technica reports:
To force companies to be more transparent about rapid developments, Illinois would likely rely on “the Big Four accounting and auditing firms — Deloitte, EY, KPMG, and PwC — to audit their safety practices,” [said Scott Wisor, a policy director at a nonprofit called Secure AI Project, which supported the bill]. The required independent audits will likely frustrate Trump, who has tried and failed to stop states from implementing AI safety laws as Congress stalls on passing any legislation.

For Trump, the priority has been to promote AI industry interests, but he began considering expanding federal government safety testing after Anthropic’s Mythos was released and the AI firm limited access due to safety concerns. Whether or not governments at any level are prepared to protect society from the most catastrophic AI risks remains a major concern for critics who wonder how and when governments will intervene. After inside sources started leaking the details of Trump’s AI safety testing plans, critics warned that even the federal government may lack the necessary expertise to audit frontier AI models. And it seems the same criticism extends to independent auditors that Illinois may rely on but industry insiders suggest some AI firms may not entirely trust.

Adam Kovacevich is CEO of Chamber of Progress, a trade group that opposed SB 315 and counts Google and Apple among its members. He told Wired that Illinois’ requirements “would force companies to expose sensitive systems to untested auditors in a regulatory regime that’s all liability and no standards.”
Governor J.B. Pritzker confirmed his intent to sign, proclaiming that “Illinois is leading the nation in holding Big Tech accountable.”
“I look forward to signing SB 315 and working with the legislature so that AI, when used, is used responsibly,” Pritzker said.

Steve Wimmer, a senior policy and technical advisor for the Transparency Coalition, said his group considers the law to be “one of the most important pieces of legislation in 2026.”

States Rights!

By ArchieBunker • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Oh wait are we for or against states rights on this? Better see what Fox has to say.

Irony

By jythie • Score: 3 Thread

These companies just love ‘move fast and break things’, unless the moving fast might break their things.
 
By their own logic, we should regulate now and work out problems later.

Supremacy Clause of Constitution says otherwise…

By drnb • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Trump Loses More Control Over AI Regulation As Illinois Passes Landmark Law

Not really, the Supremacy Clause of the US Constitution says that federal law supersedes state law when in conflict. Then there is the Commerce Clause that says the federal government gets to regulate things with foreign nations and between the states. State regulations would have to be in areas the federal does not address, and be subject to being overridden by the fed at any time.

Re:Supremacy Clause of Constitution says otherwise

By swillden • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Trump Loses More Control Over AI Regulation As Illinois Passes Landmark Law

Not really, the Supremacy Clause of the US Constitution says that federal law supersedes state law when in conflict. Then there is the Commerce Clause that says the federal government gets to regulate things with foreign nations and between the states. State regulations would have to be in areas the federal does not address, and be subject to being overridden by the fed at any time.

Sure, but it also says that Congress makes the laws, not the president. Since the GOP leadership doesn’t believe in passing legislation, it won’t be a conflict between state and federal law, it will be a conflict between state law and an executive order.

Re:Supremacy Clause of Constitution says otherwise

By swillden • Score: 4, Informative Thread

If one side doesn’t have to follow laws, why does the other?

You falsely conflate working the system with not following federal law. Trump may talk tough, he might engage is lawsuits and legal appeals and a host of other slick things lawyers come up with to delay, but after exhausting such legal options he has a history of compliance.

I’d describe it more as a history of contemptuous attitude toward both the law and the courts that stomps all over the law but usually stops just barely shy of actual contempt of court. Even that’s a bit too kind. The only reason contempt-of-court citations aren’t flying regularly is because judges are accustomed to giving the government every benefit of the doubt. That’s changing rapidly, though; the judges are getting fed up.

Valve’s Steam Deck Sells Out Again, Even After 40% Price Increase

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Valve’s Steam Deck has sold out again despite a steep price increase that pushed the 1TB OLED model as high as $949 — about $300 above its original price. “Even with the $300 price bump, the Steam Deck sold out after less than 24 hours back in stock,” reports IGN’s Jacqueline Thomas. “I don’t know how many units Valve was able to stock into its store, but it does seem like Valve spent a couple weeks building up its stock before putting the handheld back on its store.” IGN reports:
Over the last couple weeks, Valve has been receiving plenty of “game console” shipments from China. At first, I thought this was a sign that the company was getting ready to finally release the Steam Machine, but it looks like at least a portion of these shipments â" if not all of them — were Steam Deck restocks. That’s a lot of Steam Decks to sell through at these inflated prices, but it’s also possible that Valve is just staggering its stock so that its delivery infrastructure isn’t overwhelmed.

Now its just a question of when the Steam Deck will come back in stock. Before yesterday, the Deck was sold out for months. At the time, it was the most affordable way to get into PC gaming, especially in the face of the RAM crisis. That’s no longer true, but it looks like the Steam Deck’s popularity is enough to make it sell out regardless. Maybe the higher price will at least help Valve keep it in stock for people who still want to buy it, no matter the cost.
Earlier this week, Valve announced a price increase of more than 40% for two of its Steam Deck models, citing “rising memory and storage costs.”
The price changes, according to Valve, reflect “the current state of component costs and other global logistical challenges across the industry as a whole.”

“The 512GB tier of its OLED handheld gaming PC — the newer model with an upgraded display — will now cost $789, an increase of 43%,” notes the BBC. “The larger 1TB model will cost $949, an increase of 46%.”

Re:Not a fan

By ichthus • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
But, you do own one.

Re:Guess the economy is doing fine

By Brain-Fu • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

A $1000 one-time cost is quite different than the 1600+ every month average cost of rent, or the $2000 every month (median mortgage payment in usa not including property taxes, maintenance, utilities etc).

Add transportation costs, food costs, and other need-to-survive costs, and it becomes clear how a person could both afford a toy like this while living barely above paycheck-to-paycheck. And equally clear the need for entertainment to help cope.

I use mine all the time.

By WolfgangVL • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Steamdeck is a great little workstation if you can get past the form factor. I have a couple of docks around my house, and moving the system from room to room for specific tasks is pretty great. It’s sort of like a laptop in this regard, only I can swap the SD card out for a different one depending on the “Current” use case of the device.

Pretty awesome utility, and I’m suspicious that this is the sort of thing driving sales. There’s not a lot of devices with enough horsepower that can do this so seamlessly.

Re:Guess the economy is doing fine

By thegarbz • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Someone living paycheck to paycheck shouldn’t be paying median prices. They should reduce their expectations and buy/rent something less costly.

Many people weren’t living paycheck to paycheck until the price of everything skyrocketted. What you suggest, people move house en-mass?

Re:I use mine all the time.

By WolfgangVL • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Not really. A switch is a game console and does Nintendo stuff exclusively. It wont run Blender. It cant boot libreoffice, and Nintendo wont let me play playstation games or emulate my own collection.

My Steamdeck is a real computer with a real desktop OS. I can pop the SD card in for production work and dock it in my office for some light CAD/Polymodeling, and then grab the unit and plug it into my TV and drop in the emulation card for the emulation-station on the 70’' TV, then drop the unit into the art station dock and it’s a jukebox/reference station. When I’m done I can grab it on the way out and bring all of this anywhere I choose to go. This lets me convert any screen I can plug into into a workstation, a universal retro-game console, or a passive entertainment device for youtube/plex without having to log into public terminals.

I have lots of computers, laptops, SBCs, and electronic projects all over the place, and I am super familiar with networking, RDP, VNC, and Moonlight. The unique use case for the steamdeck is that it can wear many hats depending on what it’s plugged into and it’s designed to be portable. The footprint is 1/4 or less of a laptop with the same features, and the internal storage of the device and SD card logic lets me have both swappable memory for specfici use cases while still having consistent internal memory for OS and utilities.

It’s also a neat little handheld, and does all of that stuff on the tiny little screen in a pinch, and it’s pretty good a playing video games too.

Microsoft Allegedly Leaked Dutch Civil Servants’ Data To the US

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Cybernews:
The technology giant Microsoft has been accused of leaking the data of civil servants working for the Netherlands’ regulatory agencies to the US House of Representatives. The civil servants affected by the leak work at the Authority for Consumers and Markets (ACM) and the Dutch Data Protection Authority (AP), according to the NL Times. They are involved in implementing the Digital Services Act (DSA), the European Union regulation on online services, aimed at combating illegal content and protecting user rights.

NL Times reports that Microsoft shared emails, minutes, and invitations sent by the civil servants without redacting their names in the documents. Willemijn Aerdts, Dutch State Secretary for Digital Economy and Sovereignty, said she discussed the allegations with US Ambassador to the Netherlands Joe Popolo. […] The allegations against Microsoft further strengthen concerns over Europe’s dependence on American technologies, which poses major risks to data privacy.
Further reading: Netherlands Blocks US Takeover of Vital Digital Supplier

No Choice

By ISoldat53 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Microsoft had no choice but to comply with the subpoena. The Dutch, and the rest of the world, does have the choice in which cloud service, if any, they put all of their data.

You cannot trust the US government

By bradley13 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The US government can compel any US company to release data that it holds, even if that data is stored outside the US. Pretending that any US company can comply with the GDPR is a fantasy.

This might, might be acceptable, if one could trust the US government. At latest after the Snowdon revelations, we all know that you cannot.

I guess this just goes to show

By thegarbz • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The Dutch were right in telling foreign companies to fuck off: https://yro.slashdot.org/story…

And the US Ambassador who is whinging about this decision https://cybernews.com/tech/net… can go fuck himself and then fuck off. Or maybe the other way around, no one wants to see him do that.

Re:No Choice

By JaredOfEuropa • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Why do you think the Dutch authorities are now blocking the acquisition of Solvinity by some US based firm? Solvinity manages the servers for the national identity provider scheme (DigiD).
Personally I don’t think the government should be using 3rd party clouds for anything remotely critical. They have the scale to make running their own infrastructure worthwhile financially, and the know-how to run it effectively.

Re:No Choice

By Mirnotoriety • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
> Microsoft had no choice but to comply with the subpoena.

No such DOJ criminal warrant or subpoena was issued. What’s extraordinary is that the U.S. House of Representatives engaged in spying on a regulatory agency of a fellow NATO member. But then again, the current Washington Administration does seem to be about burning all bridges.

IBM, Red Hat Commit $5 Billion To Secure Open Source Supply Chains

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
IBM and Red Hat are committing $5 billion to a new initiative called "Project Lightwell,” which aims to secure open-source software supply chains with AI-assisted vulnerability discovery, triage, patch validation, and upstream maintenance. Longtime Slashdot reader wiggles shares a press release from IBM:
IBM and Red Hat today announced Project Lightwell, a $5 billion commitment backed by new frontier AI capabilities and a global force of more than 20,000 engineers to help enterprises secure open source software. Together, these investments establish a new model for enterprise use of open source software, from upstream development through production environments.

Project Lightwell will establish a trusted enterprise clearinghouse combined with a global force of engineers to identify and fix vulnerabilities at scale. The clearinghouse will serve as a security coordination layer, using advanced AI capabilities to validate and test fixes across an unprecedented volume of open source code. These capabilities will be offered through commercial subscriptions, allowing enterprises to integrate secure patches directly into their existing software supply chains with enterprise-grade validation and lifecycle management.

IBM and Red Hat have already begun collaborating with a select group of early adopters on Project Lightwell, including Bank of America, BNY, Citi, Goldman Sachs, JPMorganChase, Mastercard, Morgan Stanley, Royal Bank of Canada, State Street, Visa and Wells Fargo. The real-world insights from these initial deployments will actively shape how vulnerabilities are identified, validated, and remediated at scale across complex software supply chains.

Re:There it is

By dj.delorie • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Selling security patches as a subscription service instead of submitting them upstream to fix the problems for all users.

“from upstream development through production environments.”
“to secure open source software at its source and across the entire supply chain.”
“Share fixes upstream so that open source communities can include them in long-term maintenance.”
“Upstream maintenance alongside open source community leaders;"

Please read the whole thing.

An abominable abuse of open source.

You do understand that the freedom and licenses you’re defending, specifically allow others to use your work for purposes you don’t agree with, right?
If you’re opposed to “evil” (but legal) uses of FLOSS, you’re opposed to the core values of FLOSS.

Re:There it is

By Kernel Kurtz • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
These are the people who killed CentOS.

They know the letter of OSS, not the spirit.

Re:IBM “and” Red Hat?

By Burdell • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

From the outside, Red Hat operates as a largely independent subsidiary of IBM. I think it’s only in the last year or two that they’ve even been merging the “business operations” parts like HR.

In some ways, it feels like IBM buying Red Hat was as much about keeping anybody else from buying them (and changing them). Since Red Hat was a public company, anybody with enough cash/stock could have tried to take them over (and it sounds like there were some other interested parties), so IBM making a good offer kept them operating as Red Hat. Imagine for example if Oracle had bought them instead… things would be quite different.

Impossible

By bradley13 • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

I have a student who is writing a paper about exactly this topic. Almost any large project nowadays uses dozens of external libraries, which in turn use dozens or hundreds more. This creates a huge, almost unknowable dependency tree. Any of those libraries may be updated at any time, and be pulled into a new release of your software. Any of those libraries may contain a security flaw that could be discovered and exploited. Any of those libraries may be deliberately compromised - and how would you know?

As a current example, consider the recently discovered flaw in Starlette, which the developer claims is downloaded 325 million times per week. Never heard of Starlette? That’s because it is a fundamental building block buried deep in that dependency tree. Despite the title of the article, this flaw affects far more that just AI apps.

IMHO, the best solution - if you can afford it - is to write as much of your own code as you can. Sure, you may also have security flaws, but you are a far smaller and less interesting target. If there is a better solution, I don’t know what it is…

Re:There it is

By Himmy32 • Score: 5, Informative Thread

There is undoubtedly a disconnect here on what’s happening and your understanding.

The license on kernel does not cause the packages source to be released. The licenses on the individual Open Source packages themselves require distribution of the source code. RHEL in their OS packages distributes the code in SRPM to the subscribers, but the terms of service prevent the subscribers from sharing that code on. But Red Hat also distributes all the code in their immediate upstream CentOS stream and they provide the fixes to the upstream projects themselves.

This new product isn’t OS packages, but application packages used as dependencies. The service will be patching those dependencies especially old ones that are no longer receiving patches. Think of a project that’s currently using v2.3.4, but someone is stuck on v1.1.1. Suppose a vulnerability is found that affects both v1 and v2, but the project only fixes v2.

This service would “backport” the fix to v1.1.1a and update the deployed app to use v1.1.1a. If the application was an Open Source license Red Hat would be required to share the code of 1.1.1a to their subscriber. But their moral obligation would be to share the 1.1.1a with the upstream project.

The disconnect for Local ID10T is their assumption that IBM/Red Hat won’t share the code with the upstream project, the people on the service just get the immediate backported patch before it has a chance to trickle down the usual channel from the upstream. Not that the code won’t be shared.

Robinhood Now Lets Your AI Agents Trade Stocks

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Robinhood is launching beta support for a new feature that will let AI agents make payments and trade stocks on users’ behalf. The company is also rolling out a virtual credit card for AI agents, with spending limits and approval controls. TechCrunch reports:
Robinhood said users on its platform can now create a separate account for their AI agents and connect them to a dedicated wallet. While these agents would be able to read and analyze users’ portfolios to come up with trading strategies and suggest investments, they’ll only be able to access the pre-loaded balance in the dedicated wallet to place orders.

Users will get notifications of all trades their AI agent makes and will be able to monitor their activities within the Robinhood app. For some trades, agents will show a preview that users may have to approve before the order is executed. The company said it has also built in fraud detection protection, in which a team from Robinhood would review suspicious trades and help users resolve disputes.

Robinhood says users can connect their AI agents to its Model Context Protocol (MCP) service to do things like analyze concentration risk and sector exposure, execute trades, or look through analyst notes to identify new investment opportunities across various sectors. The agentic trading feature is launching in beta and only allows stock trading right now. The company says it plans to add support for options, crypto, event contracts, futures, and prediction markets soon.

Re:The important question

By thegarbz • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Yes but since this is robin hood the rugpull will only work if the rich get richer. As soon as you make a profit they will halt your trading forcing you to lose money. https://www.cnbc.com/2021/01/2…

How these thundercunts are still in business is beyond me.

Say it with me now…

By Pollux • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

“And....it’s gone!”

AI put it all …

By PPH • Score: 3 Thread

… in AI.

Never would have seen that coming.

I have one of these

By nospam007 • Score: 4, Funny Thread

My money controlling agent is called a W.I.F.E. = Wallet-Integrated Financial Entity

Re:Yeah, that’s gonna go well

By stabiesoft • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
Not sure if that is true. I doubt many really wealthy use robinhood. The big brokerages take good care of those with money. Very very good care. Nope, this will be robinhood stealing from the poor and giving it to the rich. The new definition of robinhood. I saw the story about this a few days ago and all I could think was those poor schlobs. They are going to get fleeced. And the ToS will protect, you guessed it, the rich. I seriously doubt robinhood will claim the AI is a fiduciary.

DOJ Charges Google Employee With $1.2 Million Polymarket Bet On Search Term

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from CNBC:
Federal prosecutors charged a Google employee with fraud on Wednesday, alleging that he made $1.2 million off of bets using insider information on Polymarket. Prosecutors claim that Michele Spagnuolo, a staff information security engineer at Google, used confidential information to place trades correctly betting that singer d4vd would be Google’s most searched person in 2025. Spagnuolo has been charged with money laundering, commodities fraud and wire fraud. The complaint, filed in the Southern District of New York, was unsealed on Wednesday.

Spagnuolo was arrested Wednesday morning in New York, ABC reported. “Spagnuolo had access to Google’s internal data systems, including a particular Google internal software tool that provided him access to confidential, nonpublic Year in Search data,” the prosecutors said in their complaint. Some observers of the Polymarket platform flagged the user “AlphaRaccoon” back in December for suspicious trades on the most searched person contracts. The complaint Wednesday said that Spagnuolo was the person behind that account. “Google officially and publicly announced its Year in Search 2025 results on or about December 4, 2025. Soon after it did so, Spagnuolo’s AlphaRaccoon account, profited approximately $1.2 million on his Google Year in Search 2025-related bets,” the complaint said.

[…] Spagnuolo is also facing a civil case from the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, where he’s charged with insider trading. The complaint detailed that Spagnuolo correctly predicted the outcomes of a slew of other search markets, including contracts like “Will Zohran Mamdani rank in the Top 5 most searched” and “Will Squid Game be the #1 searched TV show.” “Spagnuolo misappropriated the material Confidential Information by knowingly or recklessly using it to trade the 2025 Year in Search List Contracts in breach of his duties of trust and confidentiality,” the CFTC complaint alleged.

How about they go after friends of Trump?

By Targon • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

How much money was “won” by friends of Donald Trump who bet on when Trump would do this or that? How about those who conveniently timed stock trades perfectly with announcements by Trump that would cause the overall stock market to go up or down?

Now, bets on who would be the most searched for…when was the bet placed, just before the information came out, or a year ago where it would require search/advertisement manipulation to have working at Google provide any sort of extra tip information where it would be against the rules?

What?

By gweihir • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I thought “criminal” was the new “legal” as far as the DIJ was concerned? Did this person do something to piss off the Dumb?

Re:What?

By Luthair • Score: 5, Informative Thread
He hasn’t made enough money yet to bribe Trump for a pardon so he’s fair game still.

Re:This will be interesting for precedent

By Alascom • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Polymarkets are commodities.
Insider trading on Polymarket and similar prediction markets is illegal. The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) considers prediction markets to be commodities markets, meaning traders are subject to federal commodities fraud and anti-manipulation laws.

Trading based on material nonpublic information can lead to severe civil and criminal penalties - Michele is facing 10 years for insider trading, 20 for money laundering (crypto-swapping to hide source and profits), and 20 years for destruction of evidence to hide major financial crimes.

Re:What?

By sit1963nz • Score: 4, Informative Thread
Trump did not get his cut and was not told how great a leader he was.

Last.fm Goes Independent After Breaking Up With Paramount Skydance

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Last.fm announced that it is independent again after separating from Paramount Skydance, nearly two decades after CBS acquired the music-tracking service in 2007. The company says accounts, scrobbles, privacy settings, Pro subscriptions, and billing information will remain intact. Additional details are forthcoming. Engadget reports:
“Today, Last.fm begins a new chapter as an independent company,” the announcement reads. “Ownership has changed, but the product you use every day has not.” It also said that it will keep its current team. Last.fm is a music website that can track what you listen to across platforms, apps and streaming services, including Spotify, YouTube and Apple Music.Â

[…] Last.fm started as an internet radio station in 2002, and it didn’t get scrobbling until a few years later when it merged with the original team that created the tracking process. It operated as an independent company until it was acquired by CBS Interactive, which is now part of the merged Paramount Skydance Corporation, for $280 million in 2007. In 2014, it killed off its $3-a-month subscription radio service to focus on tracking your listening habits on other providers. The company promised to share more about what you can expect from the transition in the coming weeks, but everything will work on Last.fm “exactly as it did yesterday” for now.

Last FM != Soma FM

By pr0t0 • Score: 4, Informative Thread
After seeing this article, I thought I’d pop in and listen to some Groove Salad or Secret Agent radio. Whoops!

Re:that still exists?

By coofercat • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

I ditched ‘em years back, probably when they got acquired, so just took a look to see what they were about. They’ve accepted that Spotify et al. are really where it’s at, and now all they seem to do is track what you listen to on those platforms and then offer suggestions.

I suppose if you’re listening to multiple platforms, then having all that history consolidated in one place could be useful, but otherwise, I wonder how their recommendations are going to be any better than Spotify’s?

Back in the day, last.fm was pretty awesome though. I found a load of new music through listening to them, which back then resulted in me actually buying physical media. I suppose now, even if they found me something new, the best they/the industry could hope for would be that I bookmarked it or something for a couple of plays later on.

Perfect Randomness Realized For the First Time

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot
ETH Zurich researchers say they have generated certified “perfect randomness” for the first time by using a quantum Bell-test setup with two entangled superconducting chips connected by a 30-meter cooled link. “In the long term, this work could play a similar role in digital security as atomic clocks do for timekeeping: a physically certified source of randomness that other systems can rely on,” reports Phys.org. “Possible applications range from the encryption of sensitive communications and digital identities to public randomness services for lotteries and blockchain applications.” From the report:
They call their method randomness amplification. “This was made possible by an improved so-called Bell-Test with simultaneously high quality and high data rate,” says [Renato Renner and Andreas Wallraff]. He and his coworkers use a complex setup that consists of two superconducting chips, which they cool down to very low temperatures close to absolute zero. Each chip represents a quantum bit or qubit, which can take on the states “0” or “1” or any arbitrary superposition of these states. A 30-meter-long tube, which is also cooled down, connects the two chips.

Microwave photons can fly back and forth between them, thus creating quantum mechanical entanglement. This means that a quantum measurement on one qubit, which randomly yields the values “0” or “1,” influences automatically and at a distance whether “0” or “1” is measured on the second qubit. The separation of 30 meters ensures that, during the measurement, even at the speed of light, no information can be exchanged between the qubits. This would disturb the perfect randomness.

Wallraff and his team made the choice of the exact type of measurement (or “measurement basis” in technical jargon) on the two qubits depending on an imperfect random number generator. Renner’s coworkers could then amplify the randomness of the measurement results further using a special algorithm. “The resulting sequence of zeros and ones is now really perfectly random, and we can even certify that,” says Renner. He likens this result to crossing a ridge: “The technical improvements allowed us, for the first time, to create random numbers that will remain perfectly random for all eternityâ"no matter what analytical methods are used to assess their randomness.”
The findings have been published in the journal Nature.

Can someone help explain “perfect” randomness?

By thegarbz • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

I’m curious as to how this is more random than previous sources of randomness we use, specifically the development and recording of electrical shot-noise, or using a source that exhibits completely chaotic interaction with environments - pointing a camera at a lava lamp.

How were they not random enough to be considered perfect?

And I guess while we’re at it, do we really truly need an even more perfect random number for cryptography? I’m not aware of any attacks that have broken cryptography by attacking hardware random number systems (though there are those who have exploited poorly implemented software pseudo-RNG)

Re:Can someone help explain “perfect” randomness?

By r1348 • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Probably because true randomness is different than “too many parameters to account for”.
The physical interactions you described follow precise laws, it’s just that there are way too many interactions to be realistically predictable in real time… for now.
The randomness described in the article derives directly from the statistical nature of quantum physics, so it’s non-deterministic by design.

Now to be fair, all deterministic “traditional” physics is an emergent phenomenon of non-deterministic quantum physics, but that would be ahuge digression I don’t have the time and energy for right now…

Re:Unnecessary expense

By 93 Escort Wagon • Score: 5, Funny Thread

I think my wife’s conversational topics might also work.

Re:Can someone help explain “perfect” randomness?

By sleschdott • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Regarding hardware RNGs: Theodore Ts’o (of Linux fame) begs to differ. https://daniel-lange.com/docum…

Re:Can someone help explain “perfect” randomness?

By locofungus • Score: 5, Informative Thread

I skimmed a few of the referenced papers back to something in 1986.

It turns out that the practical implementation of a theoretical perfect (quantum) random bit generator (the example given in one paper was a zener diode[1]) always has some skew. This might vary over time but, for example, a random bit stream that is biased to more ones than zeros over the last 10s is more likely than not suffering from some temporary bias that an attacker can at least theoretically use.

Using classical physics it’s possible to remove this bias so that you have a pseudo-random stream that is, for all practical purposes perfect however it’s (apparently[2]) provable that doing this in the classical domain is theoretically open to attack due to the original bias.

What this has done is allowed a quantum process to do that post filtering so that even the theoretical attack on the pseudo-random stream driven from an almost perfect RNG is gone.

[1] example here - different paper:
https://www.researchgate.net/f…

[2] I took it on trust - one paper said it was proved in another referenced paper, I didn’t try to check if it really did say that and I certainly didn’t even try to follow a proof…