Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. California Bill To Preserve Online Games Fails Committee Vote
  2. Apple iPhone 18 Details Leaked In Tata Data Breach
  3. Claude Science is Here, Antibiotics Designed by Text Prompt Among Applications
  4. Microsoft Previews Linux Containers That Run In Windows
  5. County With 37 Data Centers Asks Schools To ‘Conserve Electricity’
  6. South Korea To Spend $1 Trillion On More Memory Chip Production, Humanoid Robots
  7. US Supreme Court Rules Geofence Warrants Require Constitutional Privacy Protections
  8. Remembering How Microsoft’s Fake Windows Error Ended In a $280 Million Secret Settlement
  9. Ford Rehires ‘Gray Beard’ Engineers After AI Falls Short
  10. South Korea Plans To Train Entire Military As ‘Drone Warriors’
  11. Ex-Governors, Big Tech Launch Coalition To Help Workers ‘Navigate the AI Economy’
  12. IBM Says It Can Fit Nearly 100 Billion Transistors On a Chip
  13. Scientists Think Neptune and Uranus May Not Be the Ice Giants We Imagined
  14. Trump-Shuttered Climate Change Site Now Back Online In Nonprofit Hands
  15. Microsoft Slammed for Building Copyright-Infringing Supercomputer for OpenAI in New Court Filing

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

California Bill To Preserve Online Games Fails Committee Vote

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
California’s Protect Our Games Act, which would require publishers to warn players before shutting down paid online games and offer refunds or continued access, failed to advance after a state Senate committee vote. Four state senators voted in favor, three voted against, and four abstained. Engadget reports:
The committee unanimously voted in favor of granting the bill reconsideration, meaning it could come back before this group of state senators. Assemblymember Chris Ward introduced the bill in February and it passed the California State Assembly 43-16 in late May. That said, the abstentions prevented the bill’s progression for now. “Not enough yeses means the bill stops here for this session,” a volunteer with the Stop Killing Games campaign (which supported the bill) noted on Reddit. “That is the loss.”

The volunteer also claimed this was the movement’s first attempt to nudge such legislation through in the U.S., and that the bill got this far without paid staff or an in-person lobbying campaign. They said the Entertainment Software Association — a trade organization of major game industry publishers — brought in a lobbyist to halt the bill’s progress (including by claiming private servers for the likes of Minecraft would be “illegal”) and that Stop Killing Games would be more prepared to counter that in the future.

“Next session, we come back with an in-person lobbying presence, the funding to do this properly and a long list of organizations and developers signed on in support,” the volunteer, u/Mr_Presidentle, wrote. “We are not limiting this to California. We intend to introduce versions of this in other state legislatures, and we are seriously looking at the federal level.”

Apple iPhone 18 Details Leaked In Tata Data Breach

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
“Another breach at Tata has leaked details about Apple’s iPhone 18, along with documents belonging to several other Tata clients,” writes Longtime Slashdot reader Ritz_Just_Ritz. “It’s becoming a recurring theme for the company.” Reuters reports:
Reuters has previously reported the Tata Electronics leak of more than 200,000 files on the dark web by World Leaks had files with purported component design papers of older iPhones and some parts of Tesla — both Tata clients. They also included documents of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co and Qualcomm, both of which make parts used in iPhones. New documents reviewed by Reuters show there are at least six files that map many components in the iPhone 18 Pro models to the specific company that supplies them. These include details of chips on its main circuit board and parts of the battery and cameras.

Apple considers this detail sensitive and is concerned about the documents being shared on the dark web as they relate to unreleased models, according to the person familiar with the matter. The data maps suppliers to iPhone parts, which Apple does not disclose in its public database of suppliers, the person added. In all, the documents detail hundreds of parts to be on the upcoming iPhone 18 Pro models. The records also show where Apple draws a part from several suppliers and where it relies on just a few, laying bare both its bargaining leverage and its vulnerabilities.
More broadly, the leak threatens Apple’s trust in Tata just as Tata is becoming central to its effort to shift iPhone production away from China. With India expected to produce roughly a quarter of the world’s iPhones in 2026, any deterioration in that relationship could complicate Apple’s diversification strategy and force tighter security controls across its suppliers.

So Tata’s success would come at China’s expense

By 93 Escort Wagon • Score: 3 Thread

… and China has hundreds/thousands of government-sponsored hacking teams. Nah, I’m sure there’s no connection there.

Lie with dogs, wake up with fleas.

By TigerPlish • Score: 3, Informative Thread

Every single Indian IT outfit I’ve directly worked with has been a dumpster fire. Why should Tata be any different?

That Apple relies on them is scary. That Apple’s info has been leaked thanks to Tata is no surprise.

Surely, in the meeting where this partnership was green-lit at apple someone must’ve objected, right? Right?.

Claude Science is Here, Antibiotics Designed by Text Prompt Among Applications

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Anthropic has launched Claude Science, an AI workbench that connects more than 60 scientific databases and tools through a single interface. Through the platform, Basecamp Research is making its EDEN models available for tasks such as designing antibiotic peptides and predicting vaccine targets from simple text prompts, though the results still require laboratory testing before clinical use. Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology News reports:
In a Claude Science demo, Oliver Vince, PhD, co-founder at Basecamp, uploaded a sample patient microbiology report. When given a simple natural language prompt, the platform designed peptides, predicted their efficacy, and provided a shortlist of candidates most likely to succeed in experiments in minutes. While generating human-ready antibiotics at the click of a button is still a step away, Vince said democratizing these tools is a powerful first step, particularly for researchers in regions where accelerated computing infrastructure is not readily accessible. “Most models require you to be a computational scientist,” Vince told GEN Edge. “Now, potentially any clinician in the world can chat with Claude and design an antibiotic that may work.”

Hogwash

By ByTor-2112 • Score: 3 Thread

Given how new all these systems are, even if they actually do work, there is zero chance these claims have undergone the rigorous testing needed to support them.

Microsoft Previews Linux Containers That Run In Windows

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Microsoft has released a public preview of Windows Subsystem for Linux (WSL) containers, adding a built-in command-line tool and API for running Linux containers directly inside Windows applications without third-party software. The update also introduces faster file access, improved networking and memory management, plus integration with Defender, Intune, and VS Code. The Register reports:
WSL has always been a handy way to run Linux workloads from Windows, and is particularly convenient for Linux developers who must comply with corporate edicts to use a Windows device. The CLI for end-to-end container workflows furthers this. Microsoft stated, “WSL containers make it easier for developers and organizations to build, test, and run containerized workloads while benefiting from the security, manageability, and integration of the Windows platform.”

Alternatively, you could run your preferred Linux distribution natively, but that might not be an option, particularly if an organization is keen on the “security, manageability, and integration of the Windows platform.” And this is an important point. WSL’s existing Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (MDE) has been updated (in private preview) to be aware of Linux container events, and there are settings in Intune for managing WSL containers. Support is also in a pre-release version of VS Code, where the Docker path in the dev container settings can be changed to wslc.

There is also a new default file system for WSL container that Microsoft claims makes Windows file access twice the speed. So, going from terribly slow to just slow? We’ll wait until general availability is reached before passing judgment. There’s a new default networking mode to improve compatibility and better memory reclaim techniques. However, none of these tweaks will be enabled by default in WSL. Microsoft wrote, “Since these changes touch mission critical paths like file system access and network, for now they are enabled just in WSL container.”

Other way around

By TWX • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

I would really prefer the other way around, invoking Windows containers for the few Windows apps that I am stuck running.

Ain’t nothing like the real thing baby.

By hwstar • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Running Linux in a Windows container is dumb.

Run Linux natively or run Windows in a sandboxed Linux container.

Windows is not to be trusted.

I sense a disturbance in the Microsoft force.

Could it be fear of Linux on Microsoft’s part?

Microsoft has a lot to lose if Linux becomes more widespread, but it is loss of control of the user experience that they fear the most.

Why would anybody sane do this?

By gweihir • Score: 3 Thread

Containers already need almost full system administration, even is many people are in denial about that. Running Linux containers on underperforming, unstable, insecure Windows is about the peak of stupidity.

WIndows is useless

By Murdoch5 • Score: 3 Thread
If Microsoft has to keep building Linux functionality onto Windows, just convert Windows into a user land for Linux. There is no reason to use Windows, in the very rare event Wine can’t run an application, and there is no superior replacement, such as LibreOffice, throw Windows into a VM, and run it that way. It’s astonishing the length Microsoft will go to, to keep a dead horse alive, but now they’re just replacing it with car parts, and trying to drive it on the freeway. Windows has failed, the experiment is over, Windows is a joke, and no professional would be caught using it, if they want to be taken seriously.

County With 37 Data Centers Asks Schools To ‘Conserve Electricity’

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from 404 Media:
On June 26, the County Manager of Henrico County, Virginia, John Vithoulkas, sent an email to thousands of county employees asking them to help the local government conserve electricity. “Beginning July 1st, the rate we pay for electricity used in all Henrico County government and school facilities will increase dramatically — by 25%, increasing costs by an estimated $5 million next fiscal year. We anticipate more rate increases for electricity in the years ahead,” a copy of the email obtained by 404 Media said (emphasis his).

Henrico County is a community of more than 350,000 people in eastern Virginia just outside of Richmond. It also hosts 37 data centers and there are plans to build 17 more, including plans to convert hundreds of acres of Civil War battlefields into data centers. Thanks to its proximity to DC and vast amounts of land, Henrico County became a data center hub seemingly overnight and its services clients big and small. Meta built a data center there in 2017.

“To mitigate the impact of higher electric costs, I am asking that we, collectively, make slight adjustments to conserve electricity across our individual workspaces,” Vithoulkas wrote in the email. “Turn off your lights when leaving your workspace, including when you leave for the day. Turn off your computers/laptops at the end of each workday. If your workspace has windows, adjust the blinds to manage heat from sunlight. Unplug any appliances, chargers, or other electrical items when they are not in use. Please limit use of (or refrain altogether from using) space heaters. A typical space heater alone can cost the county from $150 to $300 per year in electricity costs.”
“Each dollar we can save by conserving electricity is another dollar the county can reinvest into staff and the services we provide our residents,” Vithoulkas email said.

Electricity is not free

By jdagius • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

// … hosts 37 data centers and there are plans to build 17 more …

I’m confused. Why not let the data centers pay for the electricity they use?
Who would build a data center without some kind of plan for providing funds for energy?

Re:Electricity is not free

By Geoffrey.landis • Score: 5, Informative Thread

I’m confused. Why not let the data centers pay for the electricity they use? Who would build a data center without some kind of plan for providing funds for energy?

That’s the problem. They are buying up the energy, and outbidding the schools for it, thus raising the price.

Re:Color me surprised…

By Brain-Fu • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

So long as having the things that everybody needs requires that a whole lot of people work hard, we can’t have communism. It will just create widespread poverty like it has every other time it was tried, because it contradicts basic human psychology too strongly.

AFTER we have the level of labor automation that everyone is afraid of, where basically everything is done by robots and there are only enough jobs (of any kind) for only a tiny fraction of the population, something like communism might be sustainable. And even that is a maybe (we have zero examples of this from which to draw a conclusion, so all we can do is speculate).

Re:Not a bright idea

By gweihir • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The majority of those gun nuts are absolute cowards.

Obviously. Sure, there will be some (few) actual enthusiasts, and that is fine. But the rest gets a gun out of fear and that is about the worst reason possible. Realistically and statistically, they are most likely to hur themselves or get their kids hurt (due to incompetent gun storage).

utilities will always stick it to the little guy

By kencurry • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Here in San Diego, where water is a chronic issue, we’ve all been asked to cut use year over year. But our water bill goes up anyway. Last justification? we don’t use enough to justify discounts, so they had to raise our rates!

South Korea To Spend $1 Trillion On More Memory Chip Production, Humanoid Robots

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica:
South Korea’s government and top tech companies are committing $1 trillion to several flagship megaprojects that could bolster global memory chip supply, build new AI data centers and spur commercial deployment of humanoid robots by 2028. […] “We must secure the core elements of AI faster than any other country,” said South Korean President Lee Jae Myung in a televised speech on June 29, as reported by BBC News and other media outlets. “Semiconductors, physical AI, and AI data centers are the triple axis for a great leap forward.” […]

The most costly of the megaprojects involves Samsung and SK Hynix committing $585 billion to building new chip fabrication plants in the southwest provinces of South Korea, along with boosting semiconductor fab construction in the Seoul capital region, according to Reuters. The government’s goal is to double South Korea’s production of dynamic random-access memory (DRAM) within five years. […] The second flagship megaproject involves a $357 billion investment by the South Korean tech companies SK Group, GS Group, and Naver into building large-scale AI data centers in more outlying provinces, including South Chungcheong Province in the west, Gangwon Province in the east, and the North and South Jeolla Provinces in the southwest corner of South Korea.

The third flagship megaproject revolves around the South Korean government assigning a “national strategic industry” designation to physical AI — the AI systems that enable robots and self-driving vehicles to interact more autonomously with the real world. The government aims to develop a Korean “general-purpose foundation model” based on a world model to support robots within three years, according to The Chosun Daily. Hyundai Motor Company has also committed $5.8 billion to build a robot manufacturing facility and AI data center in the Saemangeum region of North Jeolla Province in the southwest, The Chosun Daily reported.

The South Korean automaker has already been helping Boston Dynamics — the US robotics company it acquired in 2021 — use the South Korean supply chain in scaling up manufacturing to produce 30,000 Atlas humanoid robots each year by 2028. Similarly, the South Korean government announced it would aim to commercialize humanoid robots in 10 major industries by 2028, along with training 10,000 human workers as “AI robotics specialists” over the next five years, Reuters reported.

oh look

By drinkypoo • Score: 3 Thread

Well, at least SOMEONE has decided to find out whether it’s a bubble or not the hard way.

US Supreme Court Rules Geofence Warrants Require Constitutional Privacy Protections

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 (PDF) in Chatrie v United States (No. 25-112) that geofence warrants sweeping up smartphone location data constitute searches under the Fourth Amendment. The Court found that individuals have a “reasonable expectation of privacy” in such data, even when the tracking covers only a brief period or records movements in public. “An individual has a reasonable expectation of privacy in records about his cell phone’s location, and police intrude on that constitutionally protected interest when they demand the information — even though for only a limited time, and from a third-party tech company,” wrote Justice Elena Kagan. Longtime Slashdot reader schwit1 submitted the story. The Guardian reports:
The use of geofence warrants is widespread, and gives law enforcement agencies the power to compel tech companies to hand over sensitive cell phone data from people at or near crime scenes. The warrants allow police and the FBI to collect this information from individuals within the radius of a virtual “fence” during a particular timeframe. But they are not restricted to requesting data for precise targets.

The Chatrie case focuses on local police’s pursuit of an armed bank robber in Richmond, Virginia. He fled with $195,000. Law enforcement tracked Okello Chatrie down through their use of geofence warrants. Chatrie had opted in to an optional Google “location history” feature that documented his location every few minutes. He was eventually sentenced to 12 years in prison, after pleading guilty. Chatrie’s lawyers argued that this search was overly broad and violated his fourth amendment rights, which protects individuals from “unreasonable search and seizure.” Lawyers said that police’s use of geofence warrants amounted to an official “search” under the fourth amendment, and didn’t meet the constitution’s requirements for one.

The government had argued that accessing only a short amount of cellphone location information means this tactic does not count as a fourth amendment search and accordingly, should not be afforded the same privacy protections. But the judges in the majority disagreed. The judges in the majority opinion also wrote that the government’s characterization of generating location history as a voluntary choice is “meritless.” They suggested that people aren’t choosing to share private information with third parties and the government “just by doing the ordinary thing cellphone users do.” “The point of carrying smartphones is to use what is on them,” including the apps and services they provide — many of which use location data to customize a user’s experience, they said.

[…] While the majority opinion noted that police conducted a fourth amendment search by accessing Chatrie’s location history data, they noted that the court of appeals will weigh in on whether the “search was reasonable, meaning that each of its steps was properly described with particularity and found to be supported by probable cause.” Law enforcement has said they need geofence warrants to find suspects and witnesses — after reaching dead ends. The US government, for its part, has argued that people can’t have a “reasonable expectation of privacy” when they are in public and have allowed a third party company, such as Google, to collect and analyze phone location data.

alito barrett and thomas dissent

By Anonymous Coward • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

if you agree with this decision then thank the liberals

Re:Don’t look! Don’t look!

By TWX • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Damn, I looked. Who else would be self important enough to continuously log their location? And then stupid enough to rob a bank?

Just because someone is stupid doesn’t mean that they aren’t subject to specific protections under law.

Ernesto Miranda, for whom the Miranda Warning is named, was by accounts a terrible person. Miranda’s conviction was thrown out on those technical grounds that his confession should not have been permitted, then he was retried and convicted of the crime without his confession as evidence. Once he was released from prison he died in a bar fight.

The point of protections are that they apply to everyone, guilty or innocent, and are supposed to regulate the way that the legal system all the way from the patrolman to the attorney general behave. That doesn’t mean that criminals aren’t still criminals, but it does mean that the government has to provide proper justification for its actions against persons. If someone really did commit a crime then the government should be able to show cause, and this keeps everyone else from being scrutinized when the government has no business scrutinizing.

Re:alito barrett and thomas dissent

By kqs • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

20 years ago, which was a few years after conservatives supported the Patriot Act which greatly increased govt surveillance of US citizens? Yeah, no real changes. The folks who want the police state now are the folks who have always wanted the police state (mostly through some idiotic idea that THE OTHER will be persecuted, but never themselves).

Automated license plate readers need to be next

By blastard • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

ALPR needs to be the next warrantless tracking case before the court. It is one thing for a private company to know which vehicles enter and exit their parking structure and something completely different for government to track a vehicle as it travels throughout the day.

Re:alito barrett and thomas dissent

By jacks smirking reven • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Let me be the Republican translator for you:

“Activist Judge” == “Judge who gives opinion I don’t agree with”

Just like “Free and fair election” == “Election I win, otherwise it’s rigged”

Remembering How Microsoft’s Fake Windows Error Ended In a $280 Million Secret Settlement

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Slashdot reader joshuark summarizes this walk down memory lane from the tech site MakeUseOf:
Facing real competition from Digital Research’s DR DOS, Microsoft secretly embedded a sabotaging mechanism known as “AARD code” into beta versions of Windows 3.1 to prevent it from running on Digital Research’s competing DR DOS operating system.
This code triggered fake, alarming error messages to convince developers that DR DOS was unstable… Although Microsoft disabled the feature in the final retail release, the California-based firm Caldera, Inc., which had acquired DR DOS assets, sued Microsoft for anti-competitive practices.
Microsoft settled the lawsuit out of court in 2000 for $280 million, a figure that remained sealed until it was unsealed in 2009.

Re:Oh, right!

By KiloByte • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Still, they’re the Monsanto of software: if something would be worth doing and lucrative, but is not evil, they’re not doing.

This scorpion doesn’t seem able to change its stripes.

burn in Hell Darl McBride

By Thud457 • Score: 5, Informative Thread
Wow, Caldera, there’s a company I haven’t heard about in a looooonnngg time.

Let’s remember that they transformed into blatant patent troll and persistent lawsuit pest The SCO Group which Microsoft funded in a futile attempt to bludgeon Linux out of existence.

Re:$280 mil for something they didn’t do?

By douglasfir77 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

In U.S. law, you can be charged with criminal conspiracy even if the planned crime never actually happens. Conspiracy is considered an “inchoate” offense, meaning it is a crime before the target crime is completed.

But in this case they did commit the crime.

Re:$280 mil for something they didn’t do?

By DarkOx • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

They did it in the pre-release software knowing that the issues would get picked up by the tech press. Remember this was Windows 3.1 era. Most Windows/Dos users were not internet users.

People relied on what they read in things like PC Mag and Byte, yes even corporate IT decision makers. Microsoft knew that those sorts of publications would leap on the opportunity to test pre-release Windows, would actually try it out on a variety of PC hardware and DOS versions. These were monthly publications at most and would be unlikely to give space to a second review until after the RTM version hit store shelves.

The message would be clear, for a smooth experience on the new Windows, you better plan an upgrade to MSDOS 5. I know a lot of people jumped from MSDOS 3.x to 5.0 at the same time they bought Windows 3.1[1]. So it worked..

By the time everyone figured out Windows 3.1[1] was just fine on DR DOS, they’d already switched MSDOS or already paid to upgrade to MSDOS 5, so Digital Research was not getting the users back.

Re:Oh, right!

By AleRunner • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

The irony here is that the true evil has been missed from the story. Microsoft was deliberately trying to fund Caldera to damage Linux. This settlement was an effective way to transfer money from one company to another, avoiding taxes, avoiding scrutiny and settling an outstanding potential future Microsoft liability.

Ford Rehires ‘Gray Beard’ Engineers After AI Falls Short

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Ford executives said they’ve hired 350 veteran engineers — some of them former employees — after AI and automated systems failed to deliver the desired quality, reports TechCrunch:
Bloomberg reports the company’s chief operating officer Kumar Galhotra told journalists that Ford had been “relying more and more on automated quality systems” with disappointing results. So the company “brought back technical specialists,” and those specialists “hunt for failure points before a part ever reaches the plant floor.”

Charles Poon, Ford’s vice president of vehicle hardware engineering, added, “Mistakenly we thought that by just introducing artificial intelligence and ingesting the design requirements that we had, that that would produce a high-quality product.”
The article points out that Ford is using the rehired gray beard engineers to train younger staff — and, to reprogram its AI tools.

Quitters

By bleedingobvious • Score: 5, Funny Thread

They just didn’t AI hard enough!

The real value happens when you’re 7 LLMs deep with agentic whatnots! So Simple. Just needed more AI!

Adam Becker’s book

By gtall • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Apparently the nimnods at Ford bought into the crap the Sil-Val-Bros have been selling about how AI will make everything better. If you want to know what those assholes have in store for us proles, read Adam Becker’s book, More Everything Forever: AI Overlords, Space Empires, and Silicon Valley’s Crusade to Control the Fate of Humanity.

And it does not stop with Sil-Val, apparently more money than brains makes one stupid (i.e., Besos, Elmo, etc.). You might dismiss their fevered dreams (creating an AI of themselves so they can live forever, going to Mars, planting data center warts across America to suck up power and resources, etc.), but they have a lot of money and are intent on doing a lot of “restructuring” with it. Hint, us proles do not count.

Re:Did the manager pushing the AI loose his job?

By phantomfive • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
The AI was an excuse for layoffs. They fired thousands of workers.

This is signaling to the current employees that the layoffs are done, to prevent them from quitting and finding other jobs.

This indirect messaging is annoying until you compare it to the Zuck/Meta direct way of saying, “We laid off low performers” immediately hurting the job search of any former Facebook employee.

History rhymes once again

By Registered Coward v2 • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Years ago, when I worked for Generous Electric, some brilliant CFO decided the way to cut costs was to offer early retirement with a generous package to get rid of expensive engineers. All the senior engineers I worked with spent their days justifying why they should get a package, and ultimately they did. Six month Slater tehy were rehired when GE discovered they were the only ones that really understood how to fix the systems when they broke, since they had years of experience doing just that. The upshot was they kept all their retirement package benefits plus got those of a full time employee.

Re: Smart People

By Jeremi • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Being rich doesn’t make you stupid, but being really rich starts to isolate you in a bubble of luxury and sycophants, and eventually you start to forget what the rest of the world is like, and start making decisions based on the unstated assumption that other people don’t matter.

South Korea Plans To Train Entire Military As ‘Drone Warriors’

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“South Korea plans to train every single member of its nearly half-million-strong military to operate drones as easily as they handle personal firearms,” reports Ars Technica:
The goal is to make drones a “universal combat tool” for all troops by training them to use drones like a “second personal weapon,” said Ahn Gyu-back, South Korea’s Minister of National Defense, in a June 26 briefing reported by Reuters and other media outlets. The announcement coincides with broader plans to equip individual military units with more cheap and expendable drones for surveillance and strike missions, along with deploying more counter-drone lasers and microwave weapons.

Meanwhile, South Korea’s former drone operations command headquarters that used to have direct command authority over combat units will be reorganized to focus on collaborating with South Korean industry on developing and procuring commercial drone technology, according to The Korea Times. The South Korean defense minister specifically cited the conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East as inspiring such military reforms with a focus on drone technologies… Ukraine’s use of drones and military robots as a force multiplier to offset its numerical disadvantage on the battlefield versus Russia’s larger military may carry special resonance for South Korea, given that the South Korean military’s current active-duty strength of 450,000 personnel faces a numerical disadvantage against North Korea’s active-duty military consisting of more than 1.2 million soldiers…

The defense ministry is starting out by providing 11,000 “training drones” to military personnel this year, with the goal of eventually deploying 60,000 drones across the military by 2029. An additional complication comes from the South Korean military looking to procure drones with 100 percent domestically produced components and no Chinese components due to security concerns, according to the defense minister’s comments reported by Reuters… South Korean companies are building new military attack drones, but the defense ministry may struggle to find enough commercial drones made without Chinese components to train hundreds of thousands of military conscripts, said Min-Cheol Jung, a cofounder of the Team Retriever counter-drone red team based in South Korea, in a War on the Rocks article.

Re:Good luck with that

By Tony Isaac • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Ukraine seems to have done it in just 4 years of war. Their drone components are made primarily in Turkey, Germany, and the US. I don’t see why South Korea couldn’t find a way.

The US needs to get on board too

By Tony Isaac • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Yes, I know the US already has drones. But the US military tends to have big, expensive ones. The wars of the future will rely on mass-production of small, cheap drones. The war with Iran demonstrated that, for all the billions the US spends on weapons, they can run out pretty quickly. Too many million-dollar Tomahawk Cruise missiles and not enough cheap, short-range drones.

Re:It won’t take much training

By Anonymous Coward • Score: 5, Informative Thread

It won’t take much training to use drones.

Effectively coordinating drones in combat is on par with being a pilot or air traffic controller. It takes a great deal of training. Real enemies don’t just stand around waiting to get droned. Comms are exotic, involving terrestrial repeaters, fiber, satellites, etc. Batteries are very limited, so you have to gather intel and use it effectively because you can’t just buzz around endlessly looking for targets of opportunity. Plus, the enemy is trying to kill you, and you’re radiating RF, so unless you are properly trained in concealment and countermeasures, you die.

It’s combat. Combat requires training. Lots and lots of training.

Re: Good luck with that

By nicubunu • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

If Ukraine could, for South Korea it should be much easier, considering their electronics industry is much stronger

Re:The US needs to get on board too

By Rei • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Small drones are munitions, and need to be thought of as that. Even non-FPV drones generally have quite short lifespans - for the smallest categories, just a few missions before they’re shot down, jammed, or otherwise crash. They need to be stockpiled the same way you’d stockpile grenades or artillery shells (with the caveat that you’ll have a much faster upgrade cycle on the electronics, and need to enable that). It also means short-cycle-life secondary cells, or even primary cells, as the power supply. E.g., with current tech, lithium metal or lithium sulfur are good candidates.

Middle-range strikes are increasingly proving invaluable as well in Ukraine this year. The ability to affordably take out a fuel or ammunition truck dozens of kilometers behind the front line is key.

Ex-Governors, Big Tech Launch Coalition To Help Workers ‘Navigate the AI Economy’

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“Amid growing public anger over A.I. and a debate over how to regulate it, a group of employers, state governors and foundations has raised $500 million to try to answer some of those questions themselves,” reports the New York Times.

“Just how many jobs will AI upend?” asks the Wall Street Journal, reporting that the new coalition says it’s time to ready the U.S. workforce for a “major” disruption — no matter how large it turns out to be. The coalition “has so far raised more than $500 million — about half of its multiyear goal — from companies and nonprofit groups. It will initially work with state governments in Arkansas, Maryland, Utah and Connecticut. OpenAI and Anthropic are also involved, and academics including MIT economist David Autor sit on an advisory board.”
[The new “RAISE US” coalition] will be led by former Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo, who served under former President Joe Biden, and former Indiana Gov. Eric Holcomb, a Republican. Its mandate, they said, isn’t just to build retraining programs but also to reconsider decades-old policies such as unemployment insurance and act as a working lab for testing the most effective ways to transition workers to new fields. The group will explore corporate incentives for employers to hold on to workers whose jobs are disrupted by AI and prep them for new roles… The mission of the group is to “pull all the levers at once,” Raimondo said. That means teaming up with employers to find ways to help workers gain skills or new roles and joining with educators to roll out different types of training. It also plans to propose policy changes such as tweaking unemployment benefits to let displaced workers continue to get them while they, for instance, start new businesses with AI… In Maryland, the group plans to expand a service-year option in the state to help people gain exposure to such growing fields as healthcare. An effort in Arkansas will focus on supporting “an AI-powered career navigation platform.”
More from New York Times:
The organization will work primarily with governors… The theory: States generally control their community college systems, which can translate work force policy through course offerings and industry partnerships. The bulk of the budget will fund pilot programs overseen by about 15 staff members and consultants. For example, Maryland will expand a “service year” for recent high school graduates to provide experience in fields where there are shortages, such as health care. In other states, Raise Us hopes to offer “wage insurance” for workers who take lower-paying jobs rather than dropping out of the work force entirely.

The group plans to furnish technical assistance for companies that want to retain workers as A.I. changes their roles, rather than eliminating them. Microsoft, one of the companies backing the organization, said it had already found a promising model: cross-training its entry-level lawyers in different parts of the organization and equipping them with A.I. skills in order for them to be repositioned as technology evolves. “You can think of doing that with almost any job we have,” said Brad Smith, vice chair and president at Microsoft. “It creates an opportunity to transfer people from jobs that are being eliminated to jobs that are being created....”

Ms. Raimondo and her colleagues are not fans of a universal basic income, an idea that has gained popularity in Silicon Valley as an answer to job disruption. They emphasize that work provides more than just wages, and plan to focus on helping people find pathways to new jobs. But it’s unclear whether A.I. will create jobs at the rate that it will destroy them. Jack Malde studied work force policy for the Bipartisan Policy Center and is now going to work for the Windfall Trust, another A.I.-focused think tank. He said long-term income support might be necessary, even if better models for transitioning workers were found. “The truth is, there’s still a lot of uncertainty,” Mr. Malde said. “What we think is resilient now might not be resilient later. We’re not going to get everything right, so we’re going to need those strong safety-net programs.”
Long-time Slashdot reader theodp writes:
If you think you’ve seen this movie before, prior to “partnering with governors, employers, and training partners to help the American workforce make a successful transition to an AI economy” with RAISE US, Raimondo and Holcomb partnered with governors, employers and training partners to help U.S. K-12 students make a successful transition to a CS economy with the Governors for Computer Science coalition.

Group of elites puts slush a new fund together!

By oldgraybeard • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
There fixed the headline, So far they have only collected 500 million, half of their 1 billion dollar goal slush fund goal. Just elites creating very well paying busy work for themselves and their families that will have zero effect on workers.

SCAM

By DarkOx • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Its a bunch of ex pols grabbing money so they can have nice job where they don’t actually do anything.

They will write up some policy position papers (well they’ll have chat GPT do it) and make some websites where companies like MS can put their logos. The companies get pretend they are doing something for PR reasons for a few million, literally less they retaining a handful of salaries would cost them.

It is just ‘learn to code all over again’

Grifters gonna grift.

Re:employers, state governors and foundations

By nightflameauto • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

In theory, they would work together to come up with clever, well thought out, workable solutions. In practice, expect cluelessness and politically motivated policies that may help a bit but will probably just make everything worse.

The set-up sounds like a good way to grift a ton of money while stating in very technical terms that it’s a really hard problem to solve. Essentially a very expensive, “Damn, I dunno.”

Bullshit disguised as window dressing

By jenningsthecat • Score: 5, Informative Thread

…teaming up with employers to find ways to help workers gain skills or new roles and joining with educators to roll out different types of training.

Or you could just - you know - slowly deflate the AI bubble and let people continue to do the work that AI is is in the process of taking over.

Also, since the advent of AI was predicated on almost all the work done to keep society together and functioning to this point, sharing any wealth and productivity gains produced by it would seem to be a moral imperative. And no, putting on some dog-and-pony bullshit pretense of finding new roles for displaced workers is not an attempt to share the wealth. It’s just a distraction - a pretense that “we really care about society, even though we’re secretly pleased at the prospect of its demise and will do everything we can to make that happen”.

The oligarchs want the bulk of humanity to die. They see that as the only way to slow the global warming that threatens even them, as well as the only way for them to have unfettered access to the limited food that will be available when the ecosystem collapses and the AMOC reverses. These fuckers are not our friends - don’t fall for their gaslighting.

Re:employers, state governors and foundations

By kenh • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

I guess this is “Learn to Code 2.0”? Learn to Prompt?

IBM Says It Can Fit Nearly 100 Billion Transistors On a Chip

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
IBM has unveiled “what it says is the world’s first sub-1-nanometer chip technology,” reports ZDNet, “designed to pack nearly 100 billion transistors on a fingernail-size die, roughly doubling the density of IBM’s earlier 2-nm test chip, first shown in 2021… Today, the smallest, most powerful chips top out at about 80 billion transistors.”
At the heart of the announcement is NanoStack. This is a three-dimensional, nanosheet-based transistor design that scales vertically, or along the z-axis, by stacking and staggering CMOS devices. Unlike today’s nanosheet architectures, which IBM also pioneered and which are being adopted by leading foundries at 3 nm and 2 nm, NanoStack bonds two nanosheet transistors into a single vertical structure, with each tier optimized independently and contacted from opposite sides. Each transistor in the demonstrated structure uses three sub-5 nm-thick nanosheets, about “15 silicon atoms” across, separated by roughly 9 nm spacers. Two such devices are then bonded vertically using an ultra-thin dielectric process IBM describes as a key innovation. Because the top and bottom devices can use different channel materials, dielectrics, and metals, IBM argues NanoStack is less a single trick and more a transistor platform that can be extended through multiple generations: 7 angstrom (Å), 5 Å, 3 Å, and potentially down to 1 Å in its internal roadmap.

An angstrom, by the by, is one ten-billionth of a meter. In terms of chips, an angstrom is a tenth of a nanometer. “This is the world’s first sub-1 nanometer chip technology with a new transistor architecture,” said Jay Gambetta, Director of IBM Research and IBM Fellow, during a press briefing. “We’re not just making smaller transistors, we’re reinventing how chips are built to deliver dramatically more power and energy efficiency....” Based on internal benchmarking against its 2 nm node, the company said its new chips will deliver up to 50% higher performance at the same power, or up to 70% lower power for the same performance. Big Blue also highlighted a 40% improvement in the scaling of static random-access memory (SRAM) cell area relative to its 2 nm technology.

This is a change IBM described as a “step the industry hasn’t seen in over a decade” and one that could be particularly important for AI accelerators that live or die on on-chip memory bandwidth… According to Huiming Bu, IBM’s VP of silicon technology R&D, NanoStack is a new paradigm. It’s moving chips to scaling fully into three dimensions and giving the industry at least “another decade” of logic advances as it crosses from nanometers into angstroms… The 40% SRAM density bump could also help architects push caches and on-die memory closer to compute units, cutting data movement overhead in training and inference workloads.
IBM sees a path to production use “in as early as the next 5 years”, according to the article, and “expects NanoStack to eventually underpin CPUs, GPUs, mobile SoCs, and SRAM arrays.”

IBM’s VP of silicon technology R&D says the new innovation “can improve performance by 50% compared to the best available chip today, and at the same time can reduce power by 70%.”

Using Z

By symbolset • Score: 5, Informative Thread

The angstrom scale business is marketing fluff to make the density increase understandable to consumers. But this is one of the developments leveraging the Z dimension that are legitimate progress. The Z dimension gives more than just the same chip folded like origami. The net distance traveled by a signal in a cycle can be reduced, which yields massive improvement in performance without additional cost of power/heat.

Um, what?

By CEC-P • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
IBM sold off its semiconductor business in 2014 and does not produce any chips themselves of any kind at all. They don’t even make their own qubits. What they likely meant to say was that TSMC found a way to make 1nk chips or whatever ridiculous claim they’re making that almost definitely isn’t true.

Re:Amazing if it works

By silvergig • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

We’re an amazing species and everyone needs to remember that now and then.

Yes, amazing how after all the improvements we made on technology we’re still waging wars, oppress, steal, believe fantasy characters are real, are selfishly raiding and polluting our only home at the cost of other living beings.

We haven’t improved as a species, we only modernised.

SOME people are waging wars, oppressing, stealing, destroying. I don’t believe fantasy characters are real, I don’t wage wars. I am trying to not destroy the earth. I thought about modding this shitpost down, but I’d like to point out that it’s jerky comments like this that keep everyone divided. Not everyone is perfect, just like not everyone is an asshole.

Re:IBM has been making big promises

By Tailhook • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

But what has IBM actually delivered in any of these areas in recent years?

A great deal. IBM licenses, partners and consults with semiconductor manufacturers globally, and runs a thriving IP business from their huge R&D facility in Albany, NY. Samsung, Rapidus, AMD, ST, SMIC and others are all paying for IBM tech in recent deals. GlobalFoundries bought out IBM Microelectronics for IBM’s 300mm tech. IBM is among the most prolific patent filers in the world.

The real story here is this: ASML has a new machine for a new process node. ASML is obligated to perform much of their R&D in the US due to strict export and technology sharing agreements with the US government. IBM operates huge, world class R&D lab in Albany, heavily subsidized by the state and US government. The new process that this story is about is really IBM working as an R&D partner with ASML to refine the process and get it ready for commercial operation.

In a few years, when they get the yields to something plausible, ASML customers will buy the new machines, and IBM will be in the room, taking their cut for IP, consulting, support etc.

Re:Amazing if it works

By swillden • Score: 5, Informative Thread

We’re an amazing species and everyone needs to remember that now and then.

Yes, amazing how after all the improvements we made on technology we’re still waging wars, oppress, steal, believe fantasy characters are real, are selfishly raiding and polluting our only home at the cost of other living beings.

We haven’t improved as a species, we only modernised.

SOME people are waging wars, oppressing, stealing, destroying. I don’t believe fantasy characters are real, I don’t wage wars. I am trying to not destroy the earth. I thought about modding this shitpost down, but I’d like to point out that it’s jerky comments like this that keep everyone divided. Not everyone is perfect, just like not everyone is an asshole.

And it’s also worth remembering that we wage far less war than ever before, and engage in far less of the rest as well. Stephen Pinker’s “The Better Angels of Our Nature” documents this very well and I highly recommend it.

Just consider one example: Animal cruelty. Of course some people are still quite cruel to animals, but they’re the exception, and this was not historically the case. For example there are historical accounts of a common festival entertainment in medieval France, where cats were put in sacks or baskets or hung from poles and burned alive so their yowling could amuse crowds of festival-goers. Bear-baiting, bull-baiting and cockfighting were other examples. These weren’t underground, deviant activities, they were public, family events that whole communities anticipated and attended with great enjoyment.

We’re far from perfect, but we’re getting better, and not just technologically.

Scientists Think Neptune and Uranus May Not Be the Ice Giants We Imagined

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
The planets Neptune and Uranus may be better described as “magma-ocean giants” rather than “ice giants,” according to a team of researchers from the University of California. Gizmodo reports:
While the Voyager flyby confirmed the planets’ classification as ice giants… [a]s the least explored planets in the solar system, the two planets have never been thoroughly investigated. Therefore, scientists aren’t sure where the planets originally formed in the early solar system or the reason for their wildly chaotic magnetic fields. A long-standing hypothesis suggests that both worlds have a hydrogen/helium atmosphere that covers a vast mantle of ices, made primarily of water, ammonia, and methane, with a rocky core. The new study, however, notes that the three-layer model of an ice giant’s interior structure is not the only way to explain the properties of the two planets.

The researchers also point out that objects found in the Kuiper Belt, which are thought to preserve evidence of the material in the outer Solar System where Uranus and Neptune formed, are primarily composed of rock rather than ice. For the recent study, the researchers simulated different models for the interior processes and composition of Uranus and Neptune. The model that best fits Uranus’s and Neptune’s different properties suggests the two planets have a well-mixed magma ocean with dissolved hydrogen at the bottom and a hydrogen-dominated envelope at the top. The model suggests that at high pressures, hydrogen gas can dissolve into magma, forming a well-mixed fluid. This mixing might help explain Uranus’s and Neptune’s density, which has traditionally been interpreted as evidence for an ice-rich interior.
The article notes that the theory “could also help scientists understand the interior structure of sub-Neptune planets in the Milky Way, which have thus far remained a mystery.”

Uranus

By BladeMelbourne • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Uranus is filled with gas - I refuse to believe otherwise.

Re:Uranus

By hcs_$reboot • Score: 5, Informative Thread
The only way to know for sure is to explore Uranus thoroughly.

Re:Who cares? It’s raining diamonds on Venus

By Retired Chemist • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
The price of diamonds is artificially inflated. Even gem quality stones are not that rare. The diamond industry keeps the supply low to keep the price up.

Re:Fuck Astronomers!

By PPH • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Still don’t believe in gravity. But this space-time curvature is a bitch!

Re: Rock vs Ice

By Retired Chemist • Score: 5, Informative Thread
Normal ice that occurs on earth floats. At high pressures and low temperatures, that might be expected out there, there are a large number of other allotropes that do not.

Trump-Shuttered Climate Change Site Now Back Online In Nonprofit Hands

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Donald Trump shuttered the web site Climate.gov in 2025, cutting off public access to climate information from America’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).

But “former members of the site’s team have brought much of it back at a new domain,” reports The Register:
“Trusted climate information should not disappear when politics change,” Climate.us managing director Rebecca Lindsey said of the new platform in a press release. Lindsey, who previously served as the Climate.gov program manager and lead editor, told The Register in an email that she and one of the web developers responsible for the site were the first to be caught up in government purges when DOGE swept through the department in late February 2025… Created in cooperation with sustainability nonprofit accelerator Multiplier, Climate.us aims to be an independent alternative to its old .gov, and many of the former NOAA crew behind the previous website have teamed up for the new initiative to “keep climate information accurate, accessible, scientifically rigorous, and useful for the people who rely on it.”

Climate.gov, which now redirects to a NOAA page about climate but which hosts none of the data the shuttered site used to contain, was taken offline in July 2025 following a Trump executive order prioritizing “gold standard science....” arguing that prior climate science models relied on worst-case scenarios, which somehow meant the public availability of 15 years of climate data and reporting ought to change…

All of the content that was purged from the .gov is now back, along with blogs from experts, climate status reports, maps and data pathways, and national assessments of climate change as well. Lindsey told us that rapidly changing political winds have led her to believe that the government isn’t the right place for that mission to continue, and that she would have concerns about returning the site to federal management if a future administration changed its position on climate change… Lindsey said that the Climate.us team will continue with the same mission it had before the Trump administration attempted to quash it: Getting climate science in front of the public in a manner that’s understandable so they can make their own decisions about how to respond.

Re:Probably for the better in the long run

By Barsteward • Score: 5, Informative Thread
As CO2 stays in the atmosphere for hundreds of years, lets have a look at the cumulative emissions since 1750 Oh look, USA at the top with Europe 2nd and China 3rd.

Re:Probably for the better in the long run

By Barsteward • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
China population:- 1,412,914,089
USA population:- 349,035,494
So China is just over 4 times the size of USA

China emissions:- 13,124,727,993
USA emissions:- 4,632,164,876
That makes China’s emissions just below 3 times as bad - so who is really the more polluting especially when China is making all the stuff Westerners buy?

George Martin said it best

By Ol Olsoc • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
“When you tear out a man’s tongue, you are not proving him a liar, you’re only telling the world that you fear what he might say.”

The idea that science data can be muted, and go away in the age of the internet is remarkably stupid. Climate science being suppressed is in the same vein as the old communist concept of Lamarckism, where creatures evolve in immediate time - politics, trying to impose itself on physics.

And 100 percent certain that those practicing the forbidden science have archived their science, maybe storing some copies In Svalbard. I’m waiting for our politicos to have voting on the speed of light, or making Pi equal to three like the bible tells us.

Re:Probably for the better in the long run

By evanh • Score: 5, Informative Thread

The catastrophe did not have to happen. Some restraint would’ve gone a long way. And significant directed investment would’ve made a big difference on alternative energy sources.

We had plenty of warning. Science knew the potential climatic behaviour a hundred years ago. Scientists measured the distinct trajectory in the 1960s. The knowledge to take action was understood by 1970. Nevertheless, by 1988 a full published study was presented at the UN - As a call for political action.

We all know how the politics subsequently played out. Exactly the wrong path was taken.

Re:The Working Class Ruin Everything

By F.Ultra • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Taxpayer-Funded Travel: Data from OpenSecrets has shown that Republican congressional offices have spent more on taxpayer-funded travel than Democrats in recent years

Privately Funded Travel: Tracking by LegiStorm indicates that Republican members of Congress often outpace Democrats in accepting privately sponsored trips and travel expenses.

So you lied there, and then you lied to you daughter by pretending that the Southern Strategy never happened…

Microsoft Slammed for Building Copyright-Infringing Supercomputer for OpenAI in New Court Filing

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot
The New York Times alleges Microsoft actively encouraged OpenAI to steal its copyrighted work, reports Ars Technica, citing a new (and heavily redacted) court filing Thursday:
NYT’s motion comes after the [U.S.] Supreme Court sided with Cox Communications in a case where Sony tried and failed to claim that Cox was contributing to music piracy as an Internet service provider, which set a new standard for contributory infringement. Moving forward, plaintiffs will have to prove that parties intentionally acted to induce illegal conduct. Recognizing that the legal precedent has changed, the NYT now wants to amend its complaint to align its contributory infringement claim against Microsoft with that new standard… A Microsoft spokesperson told Ars that the company views the amended complaint as “a last-ditch effort by the plaintiff to save its claim from unfavorable precedent set in other recent rulings…”

The updated complaint seeks to specify that [Microsoft’s] supercomputer was tailor-made to help OpenAI infringe and allege that it was built for the explicit purpose of training AI on copyrighted works without permission. And as the NYT alleged, its articles were more heavily weighted by this system, as both firms hoped to train models on the highest-quality journalism possible, so that level of writing could be confidently mimicked in outputs. By building this “unusually complex” machine, Microsoft not only helped select the works that were infringed but also provided a means to seize copyrighted works without permission, the NYT alleged. “Microsoft specifically designed it for the purpose of using essentially the whole Internet — curated to disproportionately feature Times Works — to train the most capable LLM in history,” the NYT alleged… Similarly as problematic for the NYT are hallucinations where Microsoft and OpenAI models falsely cite the NYT for content that they never published… “Users who ask a search engine what The Times has written on a subject should be provided with neither an unauthorized copy nor an inaccurate forgery of a Times article, but a link to the article itself,” the NYT alleged…

In a statement provided to Ars, OpenAI spokesperson Drew Pusateri reiterated the AI firm’s often-repeated claims that AI training on copyrighted works is indisputably fair use… OpenAI has argued that “ChatGPT is not a substitute for a Times subscription,” the NYT reported, partly because “they transformed the material for a different use.”
An OpenAI spokesperson told Ars Technica that OpenAI’s models “empower innovation,” while a New York Times spokesperson insisted that Microsoft “actively encouraged OpenAI to steal our copyrighted works… [O]ur core claims remain the same from the day we filed this lawsuit — that Microsoft and OpenAI stole millions of The Times’s copyrighted works to compete with our products and illegally enrich themselves.”

The article speculates that the case’s most extreme outcome “could require OpenAI and Microsoft to wipe models and start over. The NYT has also asked for permanent injunctive relief to prevent future infringement, as well as extensive damages…”

My general patience and good will is gone

By BitterEpic • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

I do not have any faith in the companies of Silicon Valley to have the greater good in mind anymore. It’s all about the money so this doesn’t surprise me anymore.

Move fast and break things as progressively transitioned into fuck with people and don’t give them to a choice to opt out. This ranges from robot-taxis blocking roads to scooters littering streets to AI glasses bringing surveillance so your data can be sold without your consent. Nope, you can’t use money anymore so that your previous purchases can be used to sell targeted advertising spots with Google pay and Apple pay.

Silicon Valley needs some more regulation. I no longer give a shit about what new hype machine that have.

PSA; Stop giving money to homeless subscription pan handling. When you pay for a subscription, you just increase the behavior and with it more pan handling. The prices for hardware have gone up because of the fucktards who keep giving money to ChatGPT, Gemini etc. WE WHO DO NOT BUY THESE STUPID SERVICES have to deal with the increased prices because of idiots unable to show restraint. Good job fucking us over chumps.

Copyright?

By dohzer • Score: 5, Funny Thread

You wouldn’t download a supercomputer…

Re:Genie is not going back in the bottle

By SoftwareArtist • Score: 5, Informative Thread

A court could absolutely order them to throw out a model. Perhaps you don’t think it’s likely to happen, but the law doesn’t depend on what you think is likely. The court could also issue an injunction barring them from training future models on copyrighted material without permission. They also could grant damages.

Consider that Anthropic settled a similar case for $1.5 billion, which shows they thought they might lose a lot more if the case went to trial.

Possession is 9/10ths of the law

By Slashythenkilly • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
To corporations with morally questionable officers, illegal business dealings are simply a calculated risk that can be written off in the loss column. It doesnt matter if its illegal dumping, stealing intellectual information, skirting import or labor laws, or sickening/killing a percentage its customers. If the truth is about to be uncovered, a corporate attorney hands over a check, a paper admitting no fault, and the recipient typically signs a non-disclosure agreement. Nobody goes to jail for or is accountable for the decisions made behind a desk because if they did, this bullshit would slow down or stop.

Crap in, crap out

By butt0nm4n • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Wild off the cuff guess stat. 80% of content being consumed by LLM is untrustworthy, opinion, wrong, brain farts. Just like what I am typing here.

Anyone who believes LLM will lead to Gen AI doesn’t get the tech or has an incomplete definition of Gen AI. We really need a new Turing test, we kinda cheated the test with LLM, made a parrot instead of a person.

The principal flaw of LLM AI as a business is that producing content wasn’t a problem we needed to solve. We were drowning in the stuff already.

LLMs give a great search and summary feature, but I don’t see a way to monetise that with ads like google does without making the results even more dubious. For a subscription model, in my enterprise take up of co-pilot is low, don’t know why, If I use my own experience, I’ve made apps I was told there was a business case for that turned out be very niche, low usage but high value, very specialist tools.

I work with a lot of ambitious go getters, who would I promote? The one who leans on AI to produce some samey looking dross, or the one who can innovate and communicate independently, think on their feet, surprise me and do more with less. If I’ve got a leader who is dependent on AI, that is a weak, compromised leader.

Then there is a phenomenal trust issue, many just don’t trust big tech with sensitive data, and who can blame them, AI companies have no respect for copyright or IP. And the hidden cost, after paying the sky high subs, the cost of your employees labour validating AI answers and patching up flaky results improving the AI product for your competition too. And your employees getting dumber the more they use it.

Nope.

I don’t doubt there are niche specialist applications to be exploited in legal and tech to get productivity and quality gains, but specialise and grow your own, don’t help your competition by improving the general models . Don’t end up dependent on a supplier, look how cloud is biting companies in the ass with fees. Once they get you hooked, they jack up the price. Bad strategy, you don’t need more parasites.