Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Amazon’s Drones Will Soon Deliver to Nearly 500 US Cities and Towns
  2. Music Publisher Round Hill Files $1 Billion Copyright Infringement Suits Against Suno, Anthropic
  3. CISA: Medusa Ransomware Hit Over 500 Critical Infrastructure Orgs
  4. Moderna, Merck Say mRNA Vaccine Prevents Melanoma From Returning
  5. X’s Algorithm Feeds Off Ragebait and Impacts Democrats More, Study Finds
  6. Army Unit Offers 4-Day Pass to Play GTA VI As Reenlistment Incentive
  7. Chinese Robotics Giant Unitree Soars In Stock Market Debut
  8. Babies Born Under Sugar Rationing Grew Into Adults With Lower Cancer Risk
  9. Physicists Entangle Quantum Memories Across a Record-Breaking 420 Kilometers
  10. Top Album Releases Linked To Rise In Fatal Crashes
  11. Cursor Launches ‘Origin’ Code Hosting Platform As GitHub Alternative
  12. Comcast Is Turning Millions of Its Routers Into Motion Detectors
  13. Disney, ABC Sue FCC Over Threats to Broadcast Licenses
  14. Memory Prices Climb 500% In 12 Months
  15. You Can Finally Buy a Fairphone In the US

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Amazon’s Drones Will Soon Deliver to Nearly 500 US Cities and Towns

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Amazon says its Prime Air drone delivery service will expand sixfold to nearly 500 U.S. cities and towns by the end of 2026, including metro areas around Chicago, Syracuse, Cleveland, Atlanta, and Boise. According to Amazon Prime Air vice president David Carbon, the service has already delivered “hundreds of thousands of packages to customers” this year, typically within about an hour. The Verge reports:
These will join 11 locations across the US where Amazon already offers drone deliveries, with each Prime Air site serving an area of approximately 175 square miles. The service aims to quickly deliver packages of up to 5 pounds or less […]. Amazon reiterated its drone safety features alongside these expansion plans, including Prime Air’s “industry-leading Detect-and-Avoid system.” That’s likely an attempt to minimize any concerns raised by the communities where the service is expanding, given these drones have already been scrutinized for crashing into cranes, internet cables, gardens, and an apartment building.

Cities?

By nospam007 • Score: 3 Thread

I doubt it.

When companies throw around terms like “cities and towns” for drone logistics, they are usually talking about sprawling suburban developments with neat, wide-open lawns, not dense urban cores.

Even with this big rollout targeting nearly 500 communities, the operational reality dictates where these things can actually land:

The Footprint Illusion:

Amazon isn’t building 500 new drone stations; they are counting every municipality touched by a regional network.

A single facility covers a massive swath of territory (roughly 175 square miles), which inevitably zeroes in on the suburbs and outer rings of places like Atlanta, Chicago, and Dallas rather than downtown high-rises.

The Landing Zone Problem: For a drone to safely drop a package (even a modest 5-pound shoebox-sized item), it needs a clear, unobstructed patch of ground free of overhead power lines, tight balconies, narrow alleyways, and inquisitive pets.

Try finding a reliable 2-meter drop zone in a dense neighborhood.
Not to mention it being a porch-pirate’s wet dream.

cnbc also reporting

By stabiesoft • Score: 3 Thread
the same but what caught my eye was “will make 1 million drone deliveries this year.” https://www.cnbc.com/2026/08/1… Well that sounds great, except even at 10 bucks/delivery that is only 10M/year. Which seems pretty low for a project that has cost this much. And is 1M deliveries even a blip on their daily deliveries? I could believe they deliver 10M pkgs per day and this is 1M pkgs per year.

Music Publisher Round Hill Files $1 Billion Copyright Infringement Suits Against Suno, Anthropic

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Independent music publisher Round Hill is suing Suno and Anthropic for allegedly using hundreds of copyrighted songs without permission to train their AI systems. The company says potential damages could exceed $1 billion, arguing there is “nothing fair” about building multibillion-dollar AI businesses on copyrighted material while rights holders receive nothing. From The Hollywood Reporter:
Round Hill is a prominent music publisher whose copyrights include the Goo Goo Dolls’ “Iris,” Bonnie Tyler’s “Total Eclipse of the Heart,” the Kinks’ “Lola” and Dio’s “Holy Diver.” The company provided a list of 500 songs that the defendants had infringed upon. Round Hill said in the suits that the company plans to “amend to list potentially ten thousand or more of their musical compositions,” with those damages potentially exceeding $1 billion. “While in other cases for copyright infringement, Defendant has waxed poetic about the necessity of progress and AI’s value to society, there is simply no reason — other than rote expediency — to have that progress come at the cost of copyrights holders,” prominent music attorney Richard Busch, representing Round Hill, wrote in the suits.

Round Hill further argued that the latter "‘expediency’ arguments completely falter” when taking into account Suno and Anthropic’s significant cash valuations they’ve earned while “exploiting illicit copies of copyrighted works, including the Round Hill Works.” “There is simply nothing fair about a company using theft to build for purely commercial purposes a multi-billion dollar business while those from which they steal receive nothing,” Round Hill said.
Suno also faces a lawsuit from Universal Music Group and Sony Music Group.

Standing on the shoulders of giants

By Local ID10T • Score: 3 Thread

Their argument is (financially) motivated reasoning blatantly ignoring the fact that their artists creations would not exist without the contributions of the artists who came before them.

None of this exists in a vacuum.

Training is analogous to learning. We all learn from others. This is legal.

What is not legal is reproducing and selling someone else’s work without permission (copyright infringement), or claiming someone else’s work as your own (plagiarism is also copyright infringement).

Any way for both sides to lose?

By pla • Score: 3 Thread
Can someone explain how this is a copyright issue? And I don’t mean that in the angsty teen “everything should be free” sense, I sincerely don’t get how this involves “copying” whatsoever.

AI companies may be playing fast and loose with IP, but using music for training is at worst a private performance for educational purposes. Or is the recording industry back to the good old days of claiming playing a CD is “copying” it into the air, and then our ears are “copying” into our brains? Because that’s functionally what the likes of Anthropic are doing with it.

To be clear, I’m neither an AI apologist or fanboy. I find it extremely useful at work, while still fearing it will eventually put us all in a zoo for our own protection (and that’s the good outcome).

CISA: Medusa Ransomware Hit Over 500 Critical Infrastructure Orgs

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
CISA says the Medusa ransomware operation has breached more than 500 U.S. critical infrastructure organizations since 2021, up from more than 300 reported last year. The group has targeted healthcare, government, defense, manufacturing, IT and financial organizations, evolving into a ransomware-as-a-service operation that recruits initial-access brokers and uses stolen data to pressure victims into paying. BleepingComputer reports:
The three federal agencies recommended that network defenders secure their networks against the ransomware group’s attacks by mitigating security vulnerabilities to protect operating systems, software, and firmware from exploitation attempts. Security teams are also advised to segment networks to block lateral movement after compromise and to block access from untrusted origins to remote services on internal systems.

[…] “Medusa developers typically recruit initial access brokers (IABs) in cybercriminal forums and marketplaces to obtain initial access to potential victims,” the advisory says. “Potential payments between $100 USD and $1 million USD are offered to these affiliates with the opportunity to work exclusively for Medusa.”

This Is What I Expect For My Tax Dollars

By SlashbotAgent • Score: 3 Thread

The three federal agencies recommended that network defenders secure their networks against the ransomware group’s attacks by mitigating security vulnerabilities to protect operating systems, software, and firmware from exploitation attempts.

Patch your shit. That’ll be $1 billion, please.

Moderna, Merck Say mRNA Vaccine Prevents Melanoma From Returning

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Moderna and Merck say their personalized mRNA melanoma vaccine significantly reduced both cancer recurrence and spread in a late-stage trial. The treatment could reach patients as soon as next year if regulators approve it. Reuters reports:
Moderna developed the vaccine with Merck and tested it together with immunotherapy drug Keytruda, a widely used treatment for melanoma. […] This is the first positive late-stage trial result for an mRNA cancer vaccine, which trains a patient’s immune system to fight tumors by targeting specific mutations in those cells and the first such study to show that adding a treatment to Keytruda worked better than that therapy alone. Similar approaches are being tested against lung, breast and pancreatic cancers.

[…] The cancer treatment combines Merck’s Keytruda with a made-to-order mRNA vaccine from Moderna that is based on an analysis of mutations found in the patients’ own tumors. The trial enrolled 1,137 high-risk patients with stage IIB-IV melanoma that had been surgically removed. Volunteers were randomized to receive up to nine doses of Keytruda plus the personalized vaccine or Keytruda alone for about one year. The companies said no new safety signals have emerged in the trial. In January, the companies announced results of a mid-stage trial of the treatment showing that it reduced the risk of recurrence or death by 49% after five years.
Karen Knudsen, CEO of the Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, said the Moderna results could signal a new era for treating solid-tumor cancers. “The positive hit here leads us into truly this next phase in immunotherapy,” Knudsen said. “This is an auspicious start — this is where things begin.”
Moderna shares more than doubled on the news, adding about $30 billion to its market value.

Sad that a company that actually does something

By ebunga • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

I think it’s sad that once again we have a company that is providing a direct benefit to the world and they’re worth only $30b when you have shitty AI companies that make the world a worse place that are worth many times that.

How this may play out

By JoshuaZ • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
If this works well, similar methods will likely work for other cancers also. Unfortunately, since it requires an individual design for a specific person, it likely is going to not benefit much from economies of scale, so it may remain very expensive. Also, given that it uses mRNA, it is likely that parts of the US right will either refuse to use it or will try to block it. Given RFK Jr. being in the Secretary of Health, what should be a slam dunk may end up becoming an uphill battle. On the bright side, some of the anti-vaxxers seem to be ok with mRNA systems once someone already has a disease.

This is amazing news!

By 93 Escort Wagon • Score: 3, Insightful Thread

… or would be, under any other presidential administration.

Still, the rest of the world can certainly benefit from it.

This is a custom vaccine - likely very $$$

By FeelGood314 • Score: 3 Thread
I would not be surprised if it becomes the most expensive drug on the market. Not that the high price is necessarily bad. Individuals will either pay or die but at least they now have a choice. And with time the price will come down and the availability increase.

Re:How this may play out

By dgatwood • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

I don’t think that’s correct? Possibly I’m misreading this, but it looks like the study involved giving two things, both the Keytruda, and a separate personalized vaccine.

You’re not misreading it. It is individualized. Different cancers express different antigens, and the mRNA vaccine needs to construct something that expresses those same antigens to train the immune system to attack them.

The nice thing about mRNA, is that it is potentially relatively cheap to synthesize mRNA strands and replicate them. It won’t be hundreds of dollars, but it won’t be millions, either. Right now, I think it’s hundreds of thousands per patient, but that will go down over time as they streamline the process of taking a sample of the tumor and determining an mRNA gene sequence that matches said cancer. And economies of scale on the equipment will also probably help.

It may also be the case that it becomes less individualized over time. At some point, we might reach the point where they have a bunch of pre-sequenced antigens that are all ready to go, and someone just keys in a list of antigens, and a piece of software spits out the mRNA sequence. At that point, it is still individualized, but with a much, much more streamlined process for generating it.

Note that I don’t work in this field, so take all of this as the opinion of an educated layperson observer. :-)

X’s Algorithm Feeds Off Ragebait and Impacts Democrats More, Study Finds

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from 404 Media:
X’s algorithm learns what you hate and shows you more of it, according to a new study just published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS). The paper, titled Value misalignment of X’s feed algorithm is a reflection of value tensions in engagement, found that the site’s algorithm prioritized engagement above all else when it generated a user’s For You Page. It also showed that X serves more ragebait to people who say they are Democrats, although the exact reason for that is unclear.
“In 2026 that’s maybe not the most surprising headline ever,” Ziv Epstein, a postdoctoral researcher at Stanford University, and co-author of the paper, told 404 Media. “So we actually dug in a little deeper to figure out why this is actually happening, and it turns out that X’s feed algorithm, like a lot of these social media algorithms, is optimized for engagement [but] it turns out that not all types of engagement are considered equally.”
The researchers found that X’s algorithm can push users toward content that conflicts with their stated values, especially when they reply to posts that anger or provoke them. Although replies accounted for just 6.8% of interactions, they appeared to carry disproportionate weight: “It’s this feedback loop of outrage baiting. The algorithm learns that you get outraged and then continues to serve more content in that direction,” said Epstein.

It’s unclear why X seems to serve ragebait to Democrats more often than Republicans. 404 Media speculates that it may be because there’s more rightwing content on X overall or that Democrats tend to engage with posts they disagree with more often. “There might be some kind of differential effects on information diets there, or it might be something more psychological about how different you know partisan identities are triggering different kinds of actions and reactions, but ultimately I don’t want to speculate too much,” said Epstein.

X’s former product chief Nikita Bier confirmed that the site had been set to favor replies. “This is no longer true,” Bier said in a post on X. “The largest contributor of seeing ragebait was the reply predictor and we were aware that angry replies were causing people to see more of that content. So last month, we gave the reply predictor a 15x boost if it’s a friend’s post — and it reduced ragebait by [an] order of magnitude.”

Facebook is atrocious this way

By Tschaine • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

My feed filled itself with political rage bait groups and pages after I took the bait from one of them. It’s pretty annoying because no matter how many times I pick “hide all from…” there is an endless supply of rage bait.

The stuff that brought me to Facebook is basically just needles in the haystack of crap at this point.

Not necessarily a bad thing

By rtkluttz • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

People on ALL social media NEED to see what the other side says just as much as their own. Echo chambers make everything worse for everyone.

Re:Is it ragebait, or

By Powercntrl • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Is it content they just don’t like?

The Republican Party itself has become a purveyor of ragebait. This is from the campaign website of the man who just won Florida’s gubernatorial primary:

From the State House to the US House, Byron has a proven record of standing up for our values. From defending Second Amendment rights, to protecting life, and to keeping radical woke ideology out of schools, Byron will always fight the Left’s agenda.

Look, I’m totally fine with seeing political positions that I disagree with. That’s how political discourse in a democracy is supposed to work. The example I just quoted though, is intentionally inflammatory.

Re: Is it ragebait, or

By fropenn • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

maybe Drmocrats are just angrier people. that’s what I see.

When you have values, and see those values violated, you get angry.

When you believe whatever the orange cheeto says, or when you just want to watch the world burn, what could make you angry?

Re:Is it ragebait, or

By dgatwood • Score: 4 Thread

Yes, to expand on your point - just looking at demographics the Democrats tend to skew younger and the Republicans tend to skew older.

This is kind of the nature of things. The older people get, the more set in their ways they become, and the less they like change. So basically, people become more conservative as they age, and less tolerant of things they don’t understand. They also accumulate more wealth and favor keeping more of it (fiscal conservatism). And so on. This is generally a well-understood phenomenon.

Emotional maturity tends to skew older as well, so it offers two possibilities:
1) The results would be the same based on age, not politicial affiliation.

If you mean that ragebait baits younger people more, you’re probably correct. Older people at some point realize that they’re not going to change anyone’s opinion when it is so thoroughly unhinged in its presentation, because that means they aren’t presenting an opinion because of careful thought, but rather because of conditioning. So it’s usually a waste of time to reply at all.

2) People with less maturity tend to want echo chambers, those with emotional control can more easily engage with challenging opinions.

IMO, rage baiting and echo chambers are basically two sides of the same coin. It’s either deliberately provoking them to condition them to attack anything that disagrees with their opinions or it is regurgitating opinions. If anything, rage baiting is the fire that tests the echo chamber. It fuels it. It creates it.

I’m okay with engaging with challenging opinions. This is not the same thing as rage baiting. A challenging opinion requires actually giving reasons for that opinion, supporting evidence, etc. Rage baiting is assuming the contrary without supporting evidence, acting as though everyone knows that it is true, and accusing people of being stupid if they disagree. The two have very little in common. It’s the difference between arguing with an intellectual and arguing with a deliberate troll. One can change opinions, or at least refine them. The other is just a bunch of talking heads shouting at each other.

Army Unit Offers 4-Day Pass to Play GTA VI As Reenlistment Incentive

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
A U.S. Army battalion at Fort Stewart is offering soldiers a four-day pass timed to the release of Grand Theft Auto VI if they reenlist for at least two years. The program is limited to one unit for now, but it fits the Army’s broader effort to appeal to gamers as a recruiting and retention pool. CBS News reports:
Twenty soldiers at Fort Stewart in Georgia in the Army’s 9th Brigade Engineering Battalion, part of the 3rd Infantry Division, have already chosen this incentive as part of their reenlistment, an Army spokesperson told CBS News on Wednesday. “The idea was to have a unique incentives program that connects to what Soldiers are interested in,” Lt. Col. Angel Tomko, a spokesperson for the 3rd Infantry Division, said in a statement. “The command team, in conjunction with the career counselor, wanted to get soldiers excited to reenlist.”

[…] The Army memo, which has circulated online, says any soldier who signs a reenlistment contract between Aug. 1, 2026 and Nov. 14 will be authorized for a special four-day pass designated to coincide with “the highly anticipated release of the video game Grand Theft Auto VI (GTA 6).” About 130 soldiers are currently eligible for the incentive, Tomko said. Eligible soldiers must reenlist for a minimum of two years and up to six years.

It’s a game to die for I guess

By ebunga • Score: 3 Thread

Or maybe that’s just the ram needed to play the game.

Hope Rockstar doesn’t miss the release date

By Powercntrl • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

So, sign up for two years of military service and get authorized leave for 4 days to play a video game? I guess if that really is the deciding factor to enlist, you probably are just the kind of person the army is looking for.

Meanwhile, in the Navy …

By fahrbot-bot • Score: 4, Funny Thread

Sailors on the aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln get to be NPCs in GTA VI for four days, which is a step-up from current living conditions there.

Re:What a benefit!

By dgatwood • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Mod parent Funny, though “continues to be money” was a bit annoying or something. Or maybe my case is too weird or too ancient? Even worse, it was an open contract with no special incentives. (And none of that insane “Thank you for your service” garbage in those days.)

It’s a statistically correct statement, at least post-1973. When asked what the main consideration for joining was, money was the top answer, and IIRC more than half gave that answer. The military is a steady job and provides other financial-adjacent benefits, such as the G.I. Bill paying for higher education. And when there aren’t so many steady jobs out there, that makes it more compelling.

Not saying it’s the only reason, just that it is one of the larger influencing factors in how well the military is able to recruit.

Coupled with SRB for various specialties....

By couchslug • Score: 3 Thread

gets cash and adds leverage for advantageous leave use

Four days leave atop thirty days normal leave per year plus whatever specialty bonus is basically a tip. Wise troops would delay taking leave until their final enlistment is up so I did. The more I had to carry forward the better.

Not everyone gives a shit about long deployments, self for example. Troops who simply don’t care about long deployments (there are more than a few of us!) but do want to accrue leave as leverage to take leave (so their unit doesn’t look like ass for not permitting it) in large chunks can use the additional days to their advantage.

My objective from the day I enlisted was always to accrue as much leave as practical (normally 90 days/year) to carry forward to the end of my career so I could bolt three months early (plus the custom of “commanders days” where G.I.s were allowed to disappear then show up to out process than take formal leave).

I also used it accrued leave in conjunction with offering to take long leave outside the holiday season so others in my work center could spend time with their kids. These customs go back to long before I enlisted.

I do STRONGLY suggest that anyone who considers themselves at all sensitive not join the armed forces because that’s stress they don’t need.
Sensitivity and war do not go together and never did. Not everyone is suited to every career civil or military and there’s no shame in not fitting, just wisdom in
choosing wisely!

It’s not that sensitivity is a fault, it’s that it’s simply not optimal and opens the door to stress-induced discomfort and emotional damage. I knew in childhood I’d fit the Air Force which I did with the goal of retiring young and debt-free which I also did, but it’s not for everyone. The fewer young people who enlist the better for all concerned because ONLY enlistment and retention create meaningful institutional pressure to raise pay and benefits!

When you serve whatever cretinous hack our dimwit (intelligence is not a choice and is, arguably neuro-divergent!) voters self-inflict you are doing other taxpayers a favor for which you should be compensated! Uncle Sugar will get his use out of you so get your use out of him! There aren’t many “idealistic” reasons to fight for a nation (which means people) this contemptibly stupid. The price of not having (even more expensive and like the last time a social disaster) an active draft is to pay the fucking troops.

The USA really is a business, not a country. That’s just human nature.

Chinese Robotics Giant Unitree Soars In Stock Market Debut

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Chinese robotics giant Unitree surged more than 600% in its Shanghai stock market debut, marking the first mainland Chinese listing by a humanoid robot maker and a major milestone for Beijing’s robotics ambitions. The BBC reports:
Unitree, officially known as Yushu Technology Co Ltd, was founded in 2016 and now plays a key role in Beijing’s ambitions to develop advanced technology. It has become a robotics industry leader, selling devices from sensors and automated arms to four-legged and human-like machines. The firm shipped more than 5,500 humanoid robots last year as demand for the technology grows.

Unitree is one of the few companies in the sector to make money, delivering a net profit of 278 million yuan in 2025. It is a fierce rival to developers in the US as it produces robots with similar features but at lower prices. The company is based in Hangzhou, in eastern China. The region is home to a so-called golden cluster zone of robotics firms, which have benefited from huge government investments. That support helped drive a more than threefold increase in the number of Chinese robotics firms between 2020 and 2024, according to state-run China Daily.

[…] Unitree’s robot dogs start at $2,700, a fraction of the roughly $70,000 price tag for Boston Dynamics’ four-legged device, Spot. “They’re not exactly comparable because some of Unitree’s dogs are much smaller,” [said Harold Soh, a researcher from the National University of Singapore]. “But the price is a big difference.” Unitree has been selling humanoid robots since 2023, with its $13,500 child-sized G1 model hitting the market the following year. Meanwhile, major US rivals — including Elon Musk’s Tesla — have yet to start delivering rival products.

[…] Some experts expect Unitree’s market debut to be a gauge of investor appetite for the fast-growing humanoid robotics sector. The listing has given the public a rare chance to invest in a humanoid robotics company and could set a benchmark for other manufacturers, said Jack Pearson from investment firm RoboStrategy. The listing also marks a “turning point” for China’s robotics industry, as Unitree’s success comes even as the US is curbing imports of foreign-made robots, Pearson said.

Re:The US is screwed

By ArchieBunker • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

In the USA these companies maximize profits above all else. They have no long term goals or planning. Now that China is besting them on quality and efficiency all they can do is cry to daddy Trump for the ban hammer. In the 70s Japan started cranking out cheap and reliable cars and caught the makers of land yachts off guard. It happened again with Harley Davidson in the 80s who went crying to Reagan.

Babies Born Under Sugar Rationing Grew Into Adults With Lower Cancer Risk

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
A study of more than 64,000 people born around the end of Britain’s postwar sugar rationing found that those exposed to less sugar during their first 1,000 days had lower rates of five cancers decades later, including roughly 69% lower liver cancer risk and 36% lower breast cancer risk. They also “showed signs of slower biological aging” and “continued to consume less sugar and had healthier diets overall,” according to the authors of a new study published in The Conversation. From the report:
After the second world war, sugar remained rationed in Britain for several years. But in September 1953, rationing ended and people started eating a lot more sugar. Consumption nearly doubled. This meant that children born just a few months apart had very different levels of sugar exposure both in the womb and during early childhood. For our study, we used data from over 64,000 people born in Britain between 1951 and 1956. Those born earlier spent a larger share of their first 1,000 days under sugar rationing, while those born later experienced progressively less of it.

[…] What is most surprising, however, is not the cancer results or the biological markers of ageing. It’s how early-life sugar exposure continued to affect people’s diets even 50 years later. We found that people who experienced sugar rationing early in life still consumed less sugar in adulthood, around age 50. They also ate less overall, and their diets were healthier and more diverse. This suggests that the level of sweetness people are exposed to very early in life may shape their taste preferences for a long time.

Re:Or

By sg_oneill • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

So the study does actually address that , and found that indeed people who didnt eat the sugar in those first 3 years tended to consume less later in life.

Annecdotally (which isnt evidence!) that rings true to me. My mother was pretty strict on no sugar and minimal salt (in the 1970s the thinking on salt linked it a lot closer to heart disease than current thinking does which has de-emphasized that a little), and nowdays I pretty much never put it in my food and shy away from sweet food, and use pretty minimal salt.

With all that said, the study does mention that children exposed to less sugar in early childhood appeared to have longer telemeres and that there is likely the smoking gun on the early childhood / sugar link, as theres a pretty well established link between telemere length and cancer succeptibility in late life. Essentially the telemeres are the caps on the end the genomes, and the longer they are, the better protected the ends of the genome are from copying errors. Its also closely associated with the hayflick limit (essentially how many copies a cell can make before it shits the bed).

Re:Or

By Rei • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

“It suggests” if you ignore that their confounder control is terrible. First, sugar wasn’t the only restricted food in post-war Britain - there was also rationing of eggs, butter, cheese and meats that ended during the same timeperiod. So you’re not actually testing the effects of sugar consumption, now are you? Also, the early 1950s was a period of rapid change in the US, including the maturation and expansion of the NHS (founded in 1948), the introduction of new childhood vaccines, major environmental shifts (for example, the Great Smog of London in 1952 vs. the 1956 Clean Air Act). Saying “all changes = sugar” just based on birthdate seems absurd.

It’s also worth mentioning that there’s also survivorship bias - anyone who died before the study couldn’t be enrolled, and there’s also no actual linking to any maternal / childhood dietary logs. Also, the ratios of cancer differences they’re describing aren’t small, they’re massive. Are we to attribute a lung cancer difference on the order of smoking vs. nonsmoking households as being to sugar, or due to, you know, smoking (or pollution) trends not accounted for in their cohort?

A life without sugar

By zawarski • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Is not worth living.

This is not surprising

By dskoll • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Inflammation increases the risk of cancer, and sugar increases inflammation, so it’s not too surprising.

Re:Or

By taustin • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

The question is, does sugar intake early in life shorten telemeres, or does having longer telemeres reduce the sweet tooth? (It seems likely that there’s a genetic component to the length, so if the child has longer telemeres, the parents should, too, resulting in a more sugar free home environment.)

Physicists Entangle Quantum Memories Across a Record-Breaking 420 Kilometers

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
alternative_right shares a report from Phys.org:
Optical fibers are already the backbone of global communication systems. Recently, however, physicists have started to explore how their functionality could be boosted further by conveying information via entangled quantum particles — potentially enabling instantaneous exchanges of information across vast distances. Such a system could eventually be the basis of a future ‘quantum internet,’ offering a level of security and computing power beyond anything possible today. In new research published in Physical Review Letters, a team led by Xi-Yu Luo at the University of Science and Technology of China in Hefei has pushed that vision further than ever, entangling two quantum memories across 420 kilometers (261 miles) of optical fiber — more than four times the previous record.

Once again

By T34L • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Entangled quantum particles do not allow for faster than light communication. They allow you to be sure that once you collapse the quantum state on one end, it has been or will be the same one on the other end too. The moment you entagle two states, you know they’re the same (or “matching”, which can also mean opposite depending on the states) without actually measuring either of them (where measuring does require destroying them).

A quantum state is like a scrach lottery ticket. You don’t know if it’s gonna win on lose until you scratch it and essentially invalidate it as a “playable” lottery ticket. Quantum entanglement allows you to “clone” tickets without actually scratching them, but you won’t know if they’re winners or losers, just that they match.

Disgusting summary

By cfalcon • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

“potentially enabling instantaneous exchanges of information across vast distances”

NO this has nothing to do with that. This is the first slashdot post in memory that should be fucking deleted. Disgraceful.

Re:Once again

By gargleblast • Score: 5, Informative Thread
Yeah this furphy comes up all the time. Entanglement is not teleportation.
Teleportation (which, let us say, is faster-than-light transmission) is: Carol writes Y therefore Ted reads Y
Entanglement is : Alice reads X therefore Bob reads X
Entanglement and teleportation are not the same. Moreso, entanglement cannot be used for teleportation..

Top Album Releases Linked To Rise In Fatal Crashes

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Guardian:
The release of a new album by Taylor Swift might be a cause for celebration among her fans, but such events have also been linked to a more sombre phenomenon: an increase in fatal car crashes. The team behind a new study say it sheds light on the impact of distracted driving. Writing in the journal Jama Network Open, [Vishal Patel, first author of the study based at Harvard Medical School] and colleagues report how they focused on the release of 10 major albums, launched between 2017 and 2022, selected for having the highest number of Spotify streams over a single day. […] The team found streaming volume for the top 200 songs in the US was 43% higher on the date of major album releases compared with the days surrounding the releases — although such data does not reveal whether the music was being streamed in a car.

[…] The researchers used data from a population-based registry of fatal US motor vehicle crashes to look at the number of traffic fatalities on the dates these albums were released, as well as for the 10 days either side. After taking into account the day of the week upon which the album was released, as well as federal holidays, and time of year, the researchers found the number of US traffic fatalities showed a relative increase of 15.1% on the date of major album releases, compared with similar days either side. “This is equivalent to approximately 182 fatalities in the US attributable to the release days of the 10 included albums,” the team writes.

Patel said the release of a new album could distract drivers because accessing music is a search task, not a single button press. “You unlock the phone, open the app, find the release, read down a tracklist, tap the right song. That’s several seconds of looking at a screen,” he said, adding unfamiliar music also demands more attention, while research has suggested listening to new, high-energy music measurably degrades driving performance. The researchers add the rise in traffic fatalities was greater among certain groups — such as younger drivers, male drivers, people who were driving alone, and people driving cars with a built-in infotainment platform. The authors say the results suggest that “online music streaming through smartphones may significantly contribute to distracted driving and traffic fatalities.”

Most people should not be driving cars

By OrangeTide • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

But without decent public transportation or reliable eyes-off autonomous driving, we’re going to continue to waste money and human life on distracted driving.

While I would love to believe that getting the word out with public service announcements to improve the public’s general awareness of the risks of distracted driving, or actively reworking our training and licensing programs. The cynic in me knows in my bones that most people think they are above average drivers, and that people will feel that raising the requirements to get a license is somehow unfair.

Spotify’s UI sucks.

By devious_malcontent • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
Yeah, I’ve had this problem before, But I’m quick to blame Spotify’s UI because it sucks, when a new album releases, I do not care and the last thing I want to see when I’m driving is a pop up for it. (Yes, this has happened to me), I have a single playlist that I play all the time and if a song that’s playing that I don’t like or don’t feel in the mood for I skip it, using the physical buttons on my steering wheel, and not taking my eyes off the road, (not that Spotify’s Shuffle algorithm is any good, it’s absolute dog shit).

And before I leave, I always make sure it’s set to that playlist as I switch to alternative playlists when I’m doing other tasks, and it’s incredibly difficult to try and change playlists while driving, I learned my lesson a long time ago and I just pull over or mute the stereo entirely and sit in silence. (No, I’ve never had an accident before, but I don’t need to, to know that trying to navigate a touch screen while driving is a bad idea, even at very low speeds).

For some stupid reason as well the user interface is different per phone device, my partner hates it on a new whatever the fuck Samsung’s new flip phone is, because the seek bar is a wobbly groove for some stupid reason, and the album art is in the wrong spot and for some stupid reason they keep insisting on changing the interface because product managers have to justify their job....

I usually have it where if I’m driving with my partner, I get her to set the playlist, but she always puts her trash music on.

Google for some stupid reason also decided to give me Gemini so trying to set navigation through voice commands is an impossible task until I changed it back, it’s still not perfect but it’s better than arguing with a clanker.

Let’s do the time warp again

By Woeful Countenance • Score: 5, Informative Thread

I thought this sounded familiar: it was reported in a working paper from the NBER in February, by Harvard in March, and by The Smithsonian magazine in April. So apparently this is either the final version of a paper previously in progress, or they’re working their way up the chain of high-impact journals. They must have some good publicists. Obviously I need to find some way to work Taylor Swift into my group’s papers.

We must listen to 80’s tunes forever.

By SubmergedInTech • Score: 5, Funny Thread

If it saves even one life, it’s worth whatever it costs.

And no, I don’t mean keep releasing new songs dubbed over Genius of Love. That already happens too frequently.

Swiftie Mob

By Local ID10T • Score: 3 Thread

I am picturing cars full of Taylor Swift fans ramming and running off the road other cars that are not playing the new album on release day… Fatality!

Cursor Launches ‘Origin’ Code Hosting Platform As GitHub Alternative

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Cursor has launched Origin, a GitHub-style code hosting platform built directly into its AI coding environment. The company is initially positioning Origin as a low-risk layer on top of GitHub, keeping GitHub as the "source of truth,” but the launch landed just as a major GitHub outage highlighted growing concerns about reliability in the age of AI-generated code. VentureBeat reports:
Cursor began rolling out Origin, its own code hosting platform, to paid users on Monday morning. Roughly three and a half hours later, GitHub’s status page lit up with what became a six-hour-and-forty-two-minute global degradation — error rates near 20% across pull requests, issues and the API, and near 50% on archive and raw file downloads, according to GitHub’s incident log. Enterprise single sign-on went down with it: SAML, OIDC, SCIM provisioning and Team Sync all failed. So did Copilot.

The developer internet did what the developer internet does. “You can now host your repos in Cursor Origin and deploy to Vercel via Cursor Origin which is itself hosted on Vercel,” Vercel chief executive Guillermo Rauch posted on X. “And unlike GitHub, it’s online [smile emoji]" Asked why he was smiling, Rauch replied: “trying to make light of the situation. We ourselves are stuck because of github rn!” Matt Palmer, who works at Cursor, quote-tweeted his own company’s launch with the day’s best line: “We were going to ship this earlier, but GitHub was down.” A GitHub outage, in other words, delayed the launch of a GitHub competitor.

Product launches get locked weeks in advance, and no evidence suggests Cursor timed this one. But the coincidence did the company an enormous favor, because it dramatized the argument Origin exists to make. For eighteen years, choosing where to host your team’s source code has been the least interesting decision an engineering organization makes. Cursor is betting that AI agents have made it interesting again — and for technical decision makers, that is the real news here. Not a new product, but a new procurement question with a governance problem attached.

Name master branches “Master”

By greytree • Score: 3, Insightful Thread
If they show the woke that their reign of hateful ignorance is over and name master branches “Master” by default, they might have some customers.

How about take that retired Win 10 box .

By drnb • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
How about take that retired Win 10 box, download the git documentation, install Linux on the box and setup your own server for your LAN?

Re:Name master branches “Master”

By sabbede • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
Changing what words we use and what they mean is no courtesy. Especially when based on willful ignorance and hypersensitivity to the absurd.

Origin? Really?

By sabbede • Score: 3 Thread
But not the EA one. Not the apparel manufacturer either. Nor is it the 3d printing company. Nor the Hong Kong online retailer, the biotech company, the pharmaceutical packaging company, the materials company, the other biotech company, the custom PC company, or any of the companies on page two, three, and so forth in the search results.

Not the most original name.

Oh good

By CEC-P • Score: 3 Thread
I’m glad they named it that instead of something that was already in use for a giant technology sector product. Good research, guys!

Comcast Is Turning Millions of Its Routers Into Motion Detectors

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Comcast is activating Wi-Fi motion sensing on millions of compatible Xfinity gateways, allowing the routers to detect movement by measuring disruptions in signals between the gateway and connected devices. The free feature, part of Xfinity Shield, can send activity alerts through the Xfinity app and offers Home, Away, and nighttime monitoring modes without requiring separate motion sensors. The Verge reports:
Wi-Fi motion sensing is a technology that has been around for a while, but it’s only recently that it’s become accurate and reliable enough to catch on. Linksys launched a similar service in 2021, but discontinued it a few years later. Lighting company Wiz launched a line of Wi-Fi-sensing smart bulbs in 2023, and more recently Philips Hue deployed a similar radio-frequency sensing technology in its products (using Zigbee rather than Wi-Fi). Comcast’s motion sensing pairs with new modes in the Xfinity app — Home Watch, Away Watch, and Dark Watch (a night/sleep mode) — allowing you to turn sensing on or off based on your activities.

Re:user consent

By brunes69 • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Its a paid feature. You don’t get it for free.

We have had access to this in Canada for a long time but it is ridiculously overpriced so I don’t pay for it.

Re:user consent

By rsilvergun • Score: 5, Informative Thread
It’s a paid feature for you to access the data but I would be shocked if they didn’t turn it on without notifying you anywhere except the finest of fine print so that they could sell the data. If all else fails here in America they will want to give the data to the police.

Re:It’s OPT-IN

By rsilvergun • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
It’s 2026 dude. Nobody believes that anymore.

Unless you have laws and they are strictly enforced with extremely harsh penalties companies will do whatever the fuck they want and you have to suck it down. And we stopped passing those kind of laws here in America in the ‘80s when Ronald Reagan took over. The few we had left on the books we stopped and forcing when newt Gingrich started fucking up Congress. And the last of our civil rights got rendered moot when we gave up the courts to a bunch of corrupt fascists.

We are at the final line of defense as far as democracy is concerned. The voters and elections. It is possible because of Trump’s failing Health we might turn that around just barely but it’s pretty touch and go right now.

Re:user consent

By Powercntrl • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Or they’ll sell the “anonymized data”, including calculated bra sizes.

Supposedly Facebook knows everything about me. They’re running on way more specific information than just “when does he walk around his house in the evening?” You know what kind of ads I keep getting lately? Ones for a ridiculously overpriced e-scooter. I’ve also been getting ads for an 80s cover band made up of two teenagers and their father, for a tour that was in Florida a little over a week ago. It got the liking 80s pop music part right, but it’s way off on my ownership of a time machine and desire to watch Gen A musicians.

I’d be downright thrilled if marketers would actually show me ads for things I genuinely would be interested in, like if Outback ever brings back Bloomin’ Mondays. Really, the worst part about ads is that the targeting algorithm is still absolute horse shit.

Re:user consent

By reiterate • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
I think they are lying and they will use it clandestinely in an attempt to enrich themselves.

Disney, ABC Sue FCC Over Threats to Broadcast Licenses

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Disney and ABC are suing the FCC to block an early review of eight station licenses, arguing the Trump administration is using the agency’s regulatory power to punish the network over programming and editorial decisions it dislikes. Reuters reports:
In a lawsuit (PDF) filed in U.S. District Court in Washington, Disney said the FCC was seeking to coerce and retaliate against “a network that refuses to bow to the administration’s demands,” calling the agency’s actions an “extraordinary assault on free speech.”

Trump has waged an aggressive series of attacks on the news media and the latest move follows a two-year-long battle between Trump and Disney. Last month, Trump again called for ABC stations to lose their licenses because the network refused to air a prime-time speech on elections. The court case will pose a key test of the free speech rights of media outlets. Disney and ABC asked the court (PDF) to quickly issue a temporary restraining order halting the license renewal proceedings and preventing the FCC from scheduling a hearing. The company said the public comment period ended earlier this month and the FCC could act at any time.

The lawsuit alleges that the administration is violating the company’s First Amendment free speech rights, saying that the FCC “is using its regulatory power to retaliate against (Disney and ABC) for programming and editorial decisions the administration dislikes.” The FCC said the move stemmed from a year-long investigation into whether Disney’s diversity policies amounted to unlawful discrimination, an allegation the company denies. U.S. District Judge Loren AliKhan issued an order on Tuesday directing the company and the FCC to propose a schedule for considering the request for a temporary restraining order and told the agency to notify her if it moves to start the process of revoking the ABC licenses.

Re:Beneficial use of the EM spectrum

By ArchieBunker • Score: 5, Informative Thread

The broadcast networks have a First Amendment right to blather as they will subject to the usual rules against incitement to violence and slander.

Haha oh I can see where this is going

However they are using a public good (the spectrum) and as such they have to show a beneficial use. Spewing non-stop lies over the airwaves is not that use. They seem to have forgotten that. There is no right to the spectrum, they can all got back to print where the rules have always been looser (the Hearst newspapers being a traditional example.)

Can you name one of the “non-stop lies” Jimmy Kimmel (or even ABC for that matter) spewed?

It’s just as well that I live in a broadcast dead zone as least as far as TV goes. It definitely cuts down on the amount of hysteria I have to filter.

So your tv has the Fox News logo burned in? Hell even Fox had to admit in court their programming is entertainment and you’re not supposed to actually believe it. https://law.justia.com/cases/f…

Re:socialist left view

By ArchieBunker • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

You. Are. In. A. Cult.

Re:Their real argument

By maladroit • Score: 5, Informative Thread

None of that has anything to do with this extortion by Trump:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…

But if ‘one-sided’ is bad, why is this ok?
“Talk radio isn’t a target of FCC’s ‘equal time’ notice, Brendan Carr says”
https://www.politico.com/news/…

What makes you think they capitulated?

By rsilvergun • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
So they’re all owned by billionaires. Everything is or at least 90% of everything.

They are a little nervous that the mad King might try to do something stupid and pointless but make no mistake they weren’t particularly put off paying a handful of bribes to Trump with the expectation of quid pro quo.

I guess what I’m saying is every single fucker involved in this is one of the Danes. None of them are on your side at least none of the people in their leadership. And there aren’t a lot of journalists left they all got shit canned for trying to cover Trump honestly in 2024. Hell after Trump arranged for Stephen Colbert to be fired from his high rating show the rest of the late night talk show hosts have backed off noticeably so threats work.

I think the problem is people are having a hard time wrapping their heads around the fact that America is becoming a fascist Nation. It’s that whole it can’t happen here problem. Or would I like to call the Dick Cheney effect.

Re:socialist left view

By geekoid • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

That’s actually not true at all. Please tell me how many American FDR called evil? Literally one of the, if not the most socialist president whose social programs led to American become a technological and industrial power house.

American modern conservatives primary planks are to take rights away from marginalized group; which s fucking evil.

Get over yourself and read some books.

Memory Prices Climb 500% In 12 Months

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
RAM prices have exploded over the past year, with some DDR5 kits approaching 500% year-over-year increases and a 128GB kit now selling for $3,399, which is more than 10 times its previous low. Tom’s Hardware reports:
Things improve as you step down the memory capacities and speed tiers, but not as much as we’d like. You’re still looking at $392 for a memory kit that was just $72 last year. To reinforce the point, I pulled the latest average price data from PCPartPicker, comparing where we are today (August 2026) to exactly one year ago. This data is somewhat approximate, but it should be broadly accurate. […] A standard 64GB (2x32GB) DDR5-5600 kit that would have cost you under $200 last summer is now demanding over $1,100. It is a 5x multiplier on a component that used to be a fairly boring and predictable line item in a PC build budget.

If you plan to just wait it out on an older AM4 or LGA1700 motherboard with DDR4, you’d better hope your memory holds out too, because DDR4 isn’t safe from the fallout. With DDR5 entirely out of reach for most builders, the resulting scramble for older platforms running DDR4 memory has created a massive knock-on effect, and as a result, DDR4 kits are up anywhere from 120% to nearly 180% across the board. Nowhere near as bad as DDR5 pricing, but it still stings when a kit that was $105 last year is $281 this year.

This phenomenon is by no means exclusive to the US, either. German tech site ComputerBase have also been tracking this global trend, reporting just this week that average RAM prices in Europe have skyrocketed by 345% compared to September 2025. Their data shows the squeeze is bleeding into other components too, with hard drive and SSD prices both climbing over 125% in that same timeframe. In fact, the situation is so severe that hyperscale buyers have reportedly already locked in almost all of the global DRAM production capacity for 2027, handing over advance deposits to guarantee their supply of precious DRAM, which is now among the highest-value commodities in the world by weight; mainstream DRAM chips are worth over half as much per kilogram as solid gold.

Thanks, AI bubble!

By Locke2005 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
I’m hoping there will lots of cheap hardware availble once the bubble pops.

AI doesn’t use desktop hardware including RAM

By couchslug • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Those days are over.

Re:AI doesn’t use desktop hardware including RAM

By Fly Swatter • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
People keep assuming the AI funnel is taking all their ram when the sad fact is that memory manufacturers simply stopped making desktop memory to use the raw materials on purpose built chips for data centers.

Micron shut down their Crucial brand because they knew they would simply not be making anymore of those products.

Re:Thanks, AI bubble!

By karmawarrior • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

No. The hardware being built for AI is basically using hardware that more closely resembles graphic cards minus the DisplayPort output than anything you can pick apart to insert in your PC. Even the memory modules are completely un-DIMM like.

At best, supply will return to pre-AI levels, but that’ll just mean that memory reduces in cost to somewhere between today’s absurd prices and Trump’s post-tariff prices. The chances of it being reduced to Biden levels is pretty low.

Memory is going to be expensive for the foreseeable future. And all because of what’s essentially a con job, an attempt to take over every substantial business in America by making their own employees unable to understand what it is they do, that nobody’s prepared to do anything about.

Re:AI doesn’t use desktop hardware including RAM

By swillden • Score: 5, Informative Thread

People keep assuming the AI funnel is taking all their ram when the sad fact is that memory manufacturers simply stopped making desktop memory to use the raw materials on purpose built chips for data centers.

Not so much the raw materials as the fab space/time, but yes.

We have pretty extensive history of how this goes; there have been a half-dozen DRAM crunches in the last ~40 years. What always happens is that prices explode, manufacturers build out massive new capacity (which takes years, and as fabs have gotten more complex it takes more years), then all the new capacity goes into production at about the same time and RAM prices crater.

And we’re definitely seeing the same processes at work this time. Between Samsung, SK Hynix, TSMC and Micron there’s almost a trillion dollars of new fab construction going on right now. When all of that comes on line, it’s going to provide a massive boost to output… and RAM prices will almost certainly drop precipitously, losing all of the recent gains plus whatever normal decline we’d have expected, plus some more.

When? Probably around 2030. 2029 if we’re lucky, though we might see a little softening by 2028. Definitely not this year and almost certainly not next year.

It could happen faster if the AI bubble bursts before then. I wouldn’t hold my breath.

You Can Finally Buy a Fairphone In the US

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Wired:
Your iPhone, SamsungGalaxy, andGoogle Pixel have a 1-year warranty. Unless you cough up extra dough for an extended service plan, you’ll pay a hefty fee if you damage the screen and need a replacement (around $329 for an iPhone 17 done directly from Apple). But it doesn’t have to be this way. What if you could order the part from the manufacturer and do the repair yourself? That dream is finally being realized for American consumers, thanks to Fairphone.

The Dutch company is bringing its repairable and sustainably built Android smartphone — the Fairphone (Gen 6+) — to the US. Each one comes with a screwdriver. A replacement screen from Fairphone costs just $90. A new USB-C port is $20. A fresh battery is $40. In all, there are 12 modular elements you can swap yourself. It remains the only smartphone series with a 10/10 repairability scorefrom iFixit, not to mention an unmatched 5-year warranty and software updates through 2033.

The new Fairphone (Gen 6+) is a small upgrade over the Gen 6 that the company launched last year. It has a newer Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 processor and double the RAM at 12 GB, but is otherwise largely the same device (hence the “plus” in the name). It now comes in Cobalt Blue, a nod to the miners who extract the cobalt used to make phone batteries, and the company’s efforts to improve working conditions in mines in the Democratic Republic of Congo. The new Fairphone is available on Amazon and at Fairphone.com for $650, and it’s officially certified to work on T-Mobile and AT&T’s networks.
While this will mark the U.S. debut of its flagship smartphone, the company first entered the stateside market last year with its repairable earbuds and headphones. It also plans to launch its next-generation Fairbuds 2 wireless earbuds later this year.

Thanks

By medusa-v2 • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Nice timing. Yesterday I was looking at de-googled variations of the plain 6 from Murena but the old version didn’t support my carrier. This one will.

Maybe the important detail is that for folks who want to dump google, you can also go that route at https://murena.com/america/sho… : I guess that makes me a shill but I’m just in it out of a general sense that google went traitor back in the day.

Not compatible with all 3 carriers

By Powercntrl • Score: 5, Informative Thread

The Fairphone’s carrier compatibility page lists carrier compatibility as being quite a bit lacking, unless your carrier is T-Mobile postpaid, AT&T postpaid or a T-Mobile MVNO.

I jumped ship from T-Mobile to Visible because of T-Mobile’s recent price increases, and this phone may as well be a brick as far as Verizon’s network is concerned.

Re: Very happy with my Fairphone

By SnotMelon • Score: 4, Informative Thread
Indeed. I’ve had my Fairphone 4 for 3 years now. Still works fine for what I need. Battery is beggining to degrade, but just checked and a replacement from the the official fairphone shop is £25.95, so I’ll probs upgrade that soon. It beats buying a knock-off “genuine” battery from Amazon for 3 times the price.

Re: Not compatible with all 3 carriers

By Powercntrl • Score: 4, Informative Thread

I would like to know if this phone will work in Verizon prepaid because I am in the market for a new phone.

The Fairphone is incompatible with Verizon, per their carrier compatibility page.

Re:Not compatible with all 3 carriers

By Powercntrl • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Why distinguish postpaid from prepaid? If a phone supports post paid should it not also support prepaid?

I’m just going by what they wrote on their carrier compatibility page. One of the other important things to note is that RCS is not supported on AT&T. I’d argue that without RCS, this is effectively a T-Mobile/T-Mobile MVNO only phone. That isn’t exactly a minor feature to be giving up.