Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. After a 10-Year Redemption Arc, No Man’s Sky Is Coming to the iPhone and iPad
  2. A New ‘Super Ice’ Is 10 Times Stronger, Bringing It Close to The Strength of Concrete
  3. Linus Torvalds On Why AI Works For Him
  4. Firefox 158 Now Available With JPEG-XL Support By Default
  5. Epic Games Delays Disney Project, Asks Developers To Use More AI
  6. Mark Zuckerberg Says Meta Has Reached AI ‘Frontier’, Rejects Calls For Slowdown
  7. Google’s Fitbit Edge Debuts a Replaceable Battery, Brings Back the Screen
  8. Russia Was Not Ready For the Data Center War It Started With Ukraine
  9. Hackers Heat French Supermarket Fridges, Sparking Fires and Spoiling Food
  10. AI Coding Agents Generate More Code, But Not More Software
  11. Amazon In Talks To Buy AI Startup Decart For Around $7 Billion
  12. Q3 2026 Was Historically Bad For PC Shipments
  13. Should We Beware of Other License Plate Surveillance Companies Besides Flock?
  14. How the US Nuclear Plant Fleet Is Leaning Into AI
  15. Let’s Encrypt to Cut SSL Certificate Lifetimes to 64 Days in February 2027

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

After a 10-Year Redemption Arc, No Man’s Sky Is Coming to the iPhone and iPad

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
No Man’s Sky is coming to iPhone and iPad on October 28, more than a decade after its rocky launch and long-running redemption arc. The title will cost $19.99, but a free trial will let users try it out before purchasing. Ars Technica reports:
It will run on devices as far back as the iPhone 11 and the third-generation iPad Air. No Man’s Sky might not have the most cutting-edge AAA graphics (though they’re still strong, and they’ve come a long way since launch via updates), but the game’s uncommon method of generating galaxies of incomprehensible scale on device consistently for all players from a single-seed happening on a phone is remarkable for those of us who remember phones performing far behind consoles or desktop PCs.

This version of the game includes all of the content and systems updates to the game that have been added over the years — the expansions that famously took the game from a rocky launch reception to a widely beloved redemption story. There are a couple of compromises, though, and it’s similar to what we saw with No Man’s Sky on the Nintendo Switch. Hello Games says the ability to build and explore player-made planetary settlements is limited to the iPhone 15 Pro and later, and multiplayer is not supported on any iOS device. “We are excited to see player feedback on iOS, and will support it appropriately based on how many folks are playing,” the company says, leaving the door open to perhaps not supporting all future content updates if the player base isn’t there to justify it.

Re:Is it actually fun for a single player?

By pla • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread
There’s effectively no difference between single and multiplayer in NMS. Multiplayer isn’t so much a distinct mode of gameplay, as merely hanging out in the game with another player. Think “playing Legos with a friend”. Same activity, just more than one person. There are a few features intended to focus on multiplayer, like the nominally co-op Nexus missions - But I’m not aware of any exclusively multiplayer content, and even the Nexus missions are IMO easier to solo than trying to coordinate with someone else. And even in purely single-player mode, you can still see/visit bases/etc from other players, you just won’t see the other players themselves.

I suppose a proper answer to your question depends on what you really mean by single-vs-multiplayer, though. There’s a core storyline that’s honestly more like a long tutorial mode, and they put on events roughly every two months (which are again often about showing off new features); but there’s not really anything you’d call a proper “campaign mode”. It’s fundamentally an open-world exploration / survival / building game, from start to there-is-no-finish.

And just in case anything I’ve said here sounds negative - NMS is a mind-blowingly good game. Strongly recommend, particularly in VR.

A New ‘Super Ice’ Is 10 Times Stronger, Bringing It Close to The Strength of Concrete

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Researchers have created a strengthened "BioPykrete" by combining ice with cellulose nanocrystals and a custom protein that binds the plant-based crystals to the ice structure. In small-scale tests, the material was about 10 times stronger than regular ice and absorbed 70 times more energy before breaking. ScienceAlert reports:
Instead of wood pulp’s larger, disordered fibers, the researchers used cellulose nanocrystals here. Cellulose is the main structural material in plants, and in nanocrystal form, it can act as a microscopic strengthening agent for other materials, including ice — essentially stopping cracks from spreading easily. The protein used here was called CBM3a-AFPIII, a combination of an antifreeze protein (AFP) and a carbohydrate-binding module (CBM). Its job was to act like glue, keeping the cellulose nanocrystals and ice bonded together.

It’s a clever approach, and the researchers think that by tweaking their ingredients and methods, they might be able to improve their ‘super ice’ even further. “Optimizing solidification kinetics and freezing protocols, alongside developing diverse AFP-CBM variants, could yield even higher-strength composites,” write the researchers. Besides further tests of the durability of the material, the researchers are also keen to take a closer look at how cracks propagate through BioPykrete, to confirm that the underlying strengthening mechanisms are what they think they are.

Further down the line, this approach could open up a whole new landscape for materials used in packaging, construction, and more: Using a custom protein to bring two unlikely compounds (ice and cellulose) together. “By bridging the gap between recombinant protein design and structural engineering, we have developed a high-performance material specifically engineered for the rigors of the world’s most extreme environments,” write the researchers.
The findings have been published in the journal Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces.

Paging Kurt Vonnegut…

By jddj • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

Meet at the ice-9 kiosk.

This will revolutionize igloo construction

By quenda • • Score: 4, Funny • Thread

but anyone who has ever fallen on their butt on an ice rink will know that ice is hard.

Maybe this will be useful on Mars? Article is not clear why this story is significant outside of its niche. We don’t normally get obscure materials science papers here.

The original Pykrete

By alanw • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

The original Pykrete was proposed to Winston Churchill and Franklin D. Roosevelt as a material for constructing aircraft carriers during WWII.

Can I build my generation spaceship from this?

By butt0nm4n • • Score: 4, Funny • Thread

It consumes the hull as fuel.

Re:The original Pykrete

By sometimesblue • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread
It was proposed by Geoffrey Pyke (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geoffrey_Pyke), a fascinating chap and Great British wartime boffin. His name should be as well known as Alan Turing and Barnes Wallace.

Linus Torvalds On Why AI Works For Him

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from ZDNet:
Many open-source developers still dislike AI. The latest example is System76 banning AI-generated content from its COSMIC desktop. At Open Source Summit Europe, Linux creator Linus Torvalds offered a different take: "I actually really like using AI,” Torvald told Dirk Hohndel, his good friend and head of Ericsson Software Technology, in their latest discussion. […] Torvalds said, “I think that you need to be very careful using AI when you’re doing something real and important.” Torvalds explained he hadn’t always felt that way about AI programming. “I used to think it was just not very good — but now I’m at the point where I actually really like using AI.”

“To be fair,” he continued, “I don’t do a lot of kernel programming. I’m a maintainer. The Linux kernel is a project where other people do the real work, and I act as the collection point. But I still enjoy programming immensely. I think AI is a wonderful tool if you use it correctly and treat it as a tool, and I find it makes programming much more enjoyable.” Torvalds recalled, “I started programming in 1981 or so, and back then computers were much simpler, and you could understand what they were doing, and also the programs you compared your own programs to were much simpler.”

“It’s a different story today,” Torvalds said. “The bar in software engineering has grown so high that it’s hard to see your own small efforts as worth anything, because you’re used to all these polished, professional programs. […] A lot of people make fun of vibe coding, but I think it’s a wonderful way to find joy in programming. It makes you feel like you’re doing something relevant. It allows you, as a new programmer, to do things that you would otherwise have a really hard time with.”

He continued: “I love the concept of AI as a gateway drug because I was working on my own toy project, the guitar pedal, and I knew what I was doing. I had a user interface that I had written myself in C that was running on a microcontroller that was running on this small screen, and I was like, “This is just stupid. It looks like something from the ‘80s; I wanted it to look like something from this century. But I don’t do Java. I do kernels.” “So, I use AI to do the things that I’m bad at,” Torvalds went on, “I’d seen all the same YouTube videos you have. Give AI a prompt, and it will do it. So I gave it a prompt, and it did it, and it was horrendous. Then I said, ‘Hey, look! I already did this in C. I did it the right way. It’s just ugly.”
Torvalds acknowledged that AI tools are helping identify security vulnerabilities and improve the Linux kernel, but at the cost of overwhelming maintainers with questionable bug reports and superficial fixes. He called some submissions “mindless band-aid kind of patches.”
That said, despite AI’s growing influence, Torvalds believes Linux’s success comes from steady, incremental development rather than sweeping changes. “I’m a big believer in the whole incremental small changes that, over time, turn into big features,” he said. The development goal remains “incremental improvement and steady progress all the time.”

I’m sure AI is great

By Rosco P. Coltrane • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

…in the hands of a competent, careful and passionate programmer like Linux Torvalds.

What I worry about is when Bob in the junior software dev team, who does his job to put food on the table, and just good enough to keep his job, uses it to vibe-code company data as his day job.

Re:I’m sure AI is great

By evanh • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

Not likely. Bob will just make bigger messes with AI. That’s what is being repeatedly stated in these articles - Only the skilled can get results that aren’t a total bodge.

And of course advocates keeps saying, after each big event when each new super super super AI is announced … and ends as just more of the same, “It’ll be better the next gen.”

Errrmm … No.(?!?)

By Qbertino • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Dude, FOSS has been fragmented since the dawn of time. It’s what we lament about every day. “Why can’t there be one distro?” “Why so many JS frameworks?” “Oh, yeah, yet another ORM and yet another PHP CMS, just what we needed!” etc.

FOSS certainly doesn’t need AI to be the noisy mess that it is. If anything I expect AI to accelerate development for teams who want to get well-rounded user-centric stuff done and know what they’re doing.

Re:110% agree with Linus!

By fleeped • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

Using it to do things that you’re bad at means you won’t get any better (fine, a lot of the time) but also you can’t evaluate the output properly as you don’t understand it, and of course you get impressed by observing (sometimes just apparent) competency. Using it to do things that you’re good at, erodes your skills.

AI is great for thing that do not matter…

By Lavandera • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

But when you have to review and take responsibility for thousands of lines AI spews it is quite another story…

I have to deliver more and take responsibility for something that is harder and makes more time to review…

I hate my work now… AI took fun from me… in return I got much more responsibility and boring review work…

Firefox 158 Now Available With JPEG-XL Support By Default

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Firefox 158 is now available with JPEG XL image support enabled by default, making .jxl images a standard part of the browser rather than an experimental feature. The release also adds JPEG XL to Firefox’s default image Accept header, improves Smart Window form filling, and brings new CSS typed-arithmetic support for developers. Phoronix reports:
At long last, Firefox 158 is ready to go with JPEG-XL image support as an alternative to the likes of WebP, JPEG, PNG, and GIF. The default HTTP Accept header for image requests also now supports “image/jxl” for the JPEG-XL image format. Prior releases of Firefox had JPEG-XL gated by an experimental option.

Firefox 158 also now supports filling forms faster in Smart Window when clicking into a form field or selecting Fill from sources. On the developer side, CSS typed arithmetic are now supported to use functions like calc() to divide two values of the same data type even if of different units.
Developer changes and release binaries can be found at their respective links.

Re: wtf is JPEG-XL

By SirSlud • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

There have been numerous articles about it recently. You have the internet. No need to stop the class just because you’re the only lazy ignoramus around here.

Re:wtf is JPEG-XL

By Jeremi • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

I didn’t know either, but I do know what JPEG is, and I have a pretty good idea about what XL might mean, so I was able to suss out that it might be a new and improved lossy-compressed image format.

Of course, approaching the problem rationally like that doesn’t provide me an opportunity to make childish insults, but that’s just one of the downsides of being a grown-up that I’ll have to live with.

Re:wtf is JPEG-XL

By Rei • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

It’s this.

And on the compression side, there’s a lot of really cool stuff that lets it happen. For example, it dynamically resizes the blocks from 2x2 to 256x256, and they don’t even have to be square. It may apply DCT in one, AFAS in another, etc - whatever is most efficient. It uses edge preserving filters to keep the edges of features clean. It can draw in splines and clone regions from one part of an image to another. Where it has to throw away high frequency noise (film grain, noisy textures, etc), it statistically samples the properties of the noise and saves that, and then regenerates equivalent noise. In “busy” areas, like say tree bark or whatnot (where the human eye isn’t good at discerning changes), it throws away more precision there, and instead allocates it to details located in fragile flat areas, such as skin and shadows, that the eye is attracted to. It works in default in XYB colour space, based on the actual interactions of the cones in the eye, so it can aggressively quantize things which the brain cannot detect. And in the choice between fast but not-great Huffman coding vs. better but slow and patent-encumbered arithmetic coding, they instead use rANS, which is nearly as fast as Huffman but as efficient as arithmetic coding, and faces no patent challenges. Which is also why you can take a legacy JPEG and rapidly losslessly reincode as JPEG-XL and get a file that’s ~20% smaller - you’re swapping Huffman for rANS.

(That’s the lossy mode - there’s also a dedicated lossless mode)

Not today, begining TOMORROW, including ESR

By williamyf • • Score: 3 • Thread

Actually, is not available until tomorrow, Oct 13, as per:

https://whattrainisitnow.com/r…
(The official Mozilla FireFox calendar)

Also tomorrow, the new ESR (ESR 153) will enter the Automatic Update Channel (as ESR 153.5.0), before that, if you wanted the new ESR, you had to manually download and install.

Epic Games Delays Disney Project, Asks Developers To Use More AI

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Bloomberg:
Epic Games delayed the release of an upcoming video-game collaboration with Walt Disney and told its developers to use more artificial intelligence tools to finish the game, according to people familiar with the project. The title had been slated for release in March, but is now delayed with no new date communicated, said the people familiar, who asked to not be identified because they weren’t authorized to speak publicly.

Developers on the game, a shooter featuring characters from the Marvel and Star Wars franchises, were instructed to implement an “AI first” production model using tools such as Anthropic’s Claude. Humans will then manage and guide that work. “No more hand-written code,” one of the game’s directors told staff in an internal message reviewed by Bloomberg. The director added that all art for the game would be “generated with full AI workflows.”

Even before this announcement, the maker of the popular Fortnite game had been pushing hard for the use of AI across all of its divisions. But this is the first time a major video-game company has attempted to build a title primarily with AI. “We’re embracing AI-accelerated development, led by Epic developers who are the visionaries and creative drivers for everything we do,” said Jake Jones, communications director at Epic Games, in a statement to Bloomberg News.

So it’s full speed ahead on AI-slop then?

By AgTiger • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Then I see no reason to give human-generated earnings to a company that does not value human programmers and artists.

Anyone wondering why Tim was upset…

By thegarbz • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

This is the reason why Timmy had a child tantrum on twitter when Steam decided it would add an AI tag games containing AI allowing consumers to avoid this goopy turd like the cholera it contains.

AI-first is a real engineering shift

By hutkept • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
Gearing up to be AI-first is a real engineering shift. With AI-first development you have to lean extra extra hard on integration, end-to-end, and fuzz tests, i.e., “behavioral” tests. Very similar to how reinforcement learning needs to bang around in a simulator before it can figure out what to do, AI-first software projects need to invest heavily in “simulator” tests (NOT unit tests) that the AI can “bang around” on (and have to pass) before you let it merge/release. This is a big shift for engineering teams that are used to thinking mathematically/axiomatically/constructively: the code is correct because it was correct before my change, and I keep it correct each time I make a change. With AI you have dozens of people who can change 100s, 1000s, or more lines of code in a commit (and that’s actually the goal) so changes easily violate that base case. The massive increase in testing reliance brings with it massive increases in VM pool infra, build infra, CI, test suite configurability, etc…, etc… So AI-first coding is a huge engineering shift going from carefully controlled code with lighter testing, to generating probabilistically controlled code with huge suites of tests, along multiple dimensions, that can run very fast, concurrently. It’s also a big culture shift. It takes time so it makes sense that mature firms running large projects are trying to get it in place before their competitors do.

Not any more!

By jenningsthecat • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

“We’re embracing AI-accelerated development, led by Epic developers who are the visionaries and creative drivers for everything we do,”

I would amend that to read "… led by Epic developers who used to be the visionaries and creative drivers for everything we do,”.

If AI takes hold and is successful under the guidance of said visionaries, then it will replace those visionaries as soon as the models advance enough. That’s the end game here - no pun intended.

Re:So it’s full speed ahead on AI-slop then?

By DarkVader • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

It’s a good thing they just admitted that this game is going to be ineligible for copyright then.

And since it’s ineligible, the DMCA doesn’t apply when it’s cracked.

Mark Zuckerberg Says Meta Has Reached AI ‘Frontier’, Rejects Calls For Slowdown

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg says the company has reached the AI “frontier” with its new Muse Wonder model and will be offered as a closed, paid product for businesses. Zuckerberg also rejected calls for an industry-wide slowdown, arguing that AI can be managed with conventional guardrails as Meta continues spending heavily on models, infrastructure, and talent. The Financial Times reports:
Speaking with the FT as Meta releases its Muse Wonder AI model on Monday, the billionaire chief executive claimed the new system was “going to allow much more sophisticated behaviours that are at the frontier of what is being done in the AI field.” […] “Getting to this point both required a large amount of compute and investment, and a lot of very rigorous scientific work by the group working on it over an extended period of time,” said Zuckerberg. […] Meta said Muse Wonder outperforms Anthropic’s Claude Opus 5.5 and Fable 5.1 and OpenAI’s GPT-6 Astra on some technical benchmarks. It said the new model can be used to carry out complex tasks from “understanding a lease to making sense of financial or health information.” However, Muse Wonder will also be “closed,” with its best versions sold directly to businesses. That pits it against Anthropic and OpenAI for corporate AI contracts in a serious test of its ambitions. Zuckerberg signaled further spending as Meta was “already working on the next step up,” adding that its model development would “probably feel like it’ll go quite a bit faster from here.”

However, he also shrugged off mounting fears that the technology was advancing at a rate that will soon surpass human control. […] The Meta chief declined to be drawn on his figure for “P(doom)" — a much-discussed Silicon Valley term to describe the probability that AI will lead to mass destruction. Instead, he argued that responsibility should fall on the individual lab to ensure model safety. “I’m much closer to the belief that AI is a technology that can be engineered with normal guardrails and built responsibly than the anthropomorphic vision of AI, which is that it is just going to go do its own thing,” he said. Zuckerberg has previously rejected calls by the heads of AI labs such as Anthropic’s Dario Amodei and OpenAI’s Sam Altman for an industry-wide “slowdown” in AI development. He also played a key role in crafting US President Donald Trump’s White House “Accord on Super Intelligence,” setting out principles for self-regulation of the industry, which critics say falls far short of a formal global AI governance regime.

Hear me out on this

By DarkOx • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

I don’t think there is a business running frontier models as a pure activity.

It would be like Ford had decided they were never going to build cars for the public but rather build cars for their own cab company. Eventually it just isn’t going to make economic sense to run this stuff in a data center where you could run it locally or run something almost as good locally and the hardware is going to get there.

Which again is not to suggest this stuff isn’t useful or valuable, or that the actual creation and training of models is going to get cheap or easy. That likely stays expensive.

So what that says to me is OpenAI and Anthropic don’t have a real business. They are ultimately acquisition targets for a Microsoft or similar because having ‘the best’ proprietary model to integrate into your products is a differentiation point and probably one the market will value. Meta to has things it can put its own AI products into.

Meta also has experience running and very public very massive IT operation…Something the labs with all their model escapes have shown they can’t or won’t do well. I actually have more confidence in Meta here than in the other players at the moment, and I expect Mark is right there is no need to stop, just a need to do it right, which Meta/facebook can and for others to be held to account for their failures.

I smell plateau

By greytree • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
In my experience the new Frontier LLM models are in no way as much of an advance over their predecessors as their predecessors were.

I think LLMs’ capabilities are reaching an asymptote and different techniques will be required to go further.

Luckily, because I think we need a decent, competent president to save humanity from AGI when it arrives.

It’s all bullshit & marketing hype

By FudRucker • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
All the data that goes in to AI is human made data, the only thing AI can do is categorize it then hand it back out upon request, so AI is basically a search engine algorithm with a chatbot attached, you can not convince me it is more than that, and most the data fed into AI is copyrighted anyway so it is stolen data at that

Please share what you’re smoking

By apparently • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread

I expect Mark is right there is no need to stop, just a need to do it right, which Meta/facebook can .

Ah yes, if there’s one thing Mark and Meta/facebook are known for, it’s “doing things right” — they’re TOTALLY not known for massive privacy and data security failures.

Truly, wtf are you talking about and why are you subjecting the rest of us to it?

I think this is good news

By karmawarrior • • Score: 4, Funny • Thread

If Meta is going all in on AI, maybe it’ll cause them to collapse when the bubble bursts.

Google’s Fitbit Edge Debuts a Replaceable Battery, Brings Back the Screen

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Google has introduced the $179 Fitbit Edge, a new fitness tracker with a 1.34-inch OLED display, built-in GPS, ECG support, week-long battery life, and Fitbit’s first user-replaceable battery. “And unlike the Pixel Watch, it’s compatible with Android and iPhones via the Google Health app,” reports Wired. From the report:
The Edge has a user-replaceable battery, a Fitbit first, aligning with Google’s efforts to make its Pixel Watch more repairable. (Likely also due to new battery regulations set to take effect next year in the European Union.) Repair options will vary by region and availability. If you find the Pixel Watch’s round face too bulky, the Edge’s capsule-shaped alternative might suit smaller wrists better. If the Charge 6’s 1.04-inch display was too small, the Edge upgrades it to a larger 1.34-inch screen. The difference is noticeable, and that extra real estate could make a real impact when glancing at your metrics mid-workout.

The Edge borrows a few more attributes from the Pixel Watch, including an altimeter that uses atmospheric pressure to measure elevation changes. That means it can record elevation gain and loss during outdoor activities, track floors climbed, and add more context to your outdoor stats. It also has a far-field skin temperature sensor, replacing the standard device temperature sensor found in other Fitbits. By bringing some of the Pixel Watch’s more advanced hardware to a fitness-first wearable, Google is giving the Edge a compelling middle-ground position in its lineup at a Fitbit-friendly price.

The Edge inherits the Fitbit Air’s improvements while restoring several Charge 6 features the screenless tracker lacks, including built-in GPS and electrical sensors that work with the electrocardiogram (ECG) app. You can also control music playback on a connected Bluetooth device, as you could with the Charge 6, and Google Maps turn-by-turn directions will arrive later this year. […] With a Google Health Premium subscription, the Edge can track blood pressure trends without manual calibration and insulin resistance trends without requiring a blood draw. Google first announced these capabilities alongside the Pixel Watch 5’s debut, but they only became available at the end of September. They’re also available on the Air, keeping Google’s screenless tracker up to date as its lineup expands.

Cool, but…

By Locke2005 • • Score: 3 • Thread
What does that do to its IP65 rating? That being said, my Pixel 3 phone lost it’s seal and had a huge gap for water to flow in, and my Pixel 3 watch just complete lost it’s seal and just fell open into two separate halfs with only the flex circuit holding them together. What I’m saying is that Google never figured out how to properly seal cases without replaceable batteries, which makes me skeptical they can seal cases with replaceable batteries. Or maybe the glue they use is specifically designed to fail after 3 years.

Another candidate for the Google Graveyard.

By AgTiger • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

Before one buys any hardware, or comes to rely on any software by Google, it’s a good idea to visit Google Graveyard and take a few minutes to ponder over how long it will be before Google abandons the technology it’s trying to sell you, leaving you with yet another piece of e-waste.

Perfect. I want one because…

By greytree • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread
Google do not already track me enough. I really want them to know where I am every minute of the day, as well as recording my voice and keystrokes.
They deserve that, because they’re not evil.
Well, they weren’t, once.

Russia Was Not Ready For the Data Center War It Started With Ukraine

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica:
When Russia began attacking Ukrainian data centers and telecommunication infrastructure, it apparently failed to prepare for possible retaliation. Now Russia’s digital services are facing widespread outages after Ukrainian drone strikes knocked out three of the largest data centers owned by Russian tech giant Yandex within several days. Pro-Kremlin bloggers are warning that Russia’s centralized digital economy could collapse because the country is not prepared for the “data center war” it started, according to posts translated by the pseudonymous independent researcher ChrisO_wiki. The Russian commentators also suggested that Ukraine’s decentralized digital services could prove more resilient than Russia’s system if the countries continue trading such blows.

Russia initially launched a drone strike campaign targeting Ukrainian data centers and mobile phone networks in late September. The attacks temporarily disrupted Internet and cell phone service for up to 100,000 households in the Ukrainian capital of Kyiv and came as part of a broader long-range strike campaign that has involved Russian missiles and jet-powered drones hitting Ukraine’s power grid infrastructure, transportation hubs, and even residential apartment building blocks. But Ukraine soon began striking back at data centers owned by the Russian company Yandex, also known as “Russia’s Google,” in what Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has described as a “symmetrical response.”

[…] More importantly for Russian society, the damage to Yandex’s data centers has reportedly caused interruptions or outages to popular Russian payment apps and digital banking services, email, e-commerce platforms, video streaming services, ride-hailing and food delivery apps, and navigation and map services. Yandex’s search engine also accounts for about 70 percent of the market share in Russia. The disruptions are even more widespread, because the data center damage also impacts Yandex’s cloud computing service, which counts some of Russia’s largest companies as customers, according to The Moscow Times, an independent newspaper. These include large grocery and fast-food chains as well as a household appliance retailer.

Much deserved schadenfreude

By RUs1729 • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

It is difficult to feel sorry about Russia’s problems.

Delenda est Russia

Re:Good for the US as well…

By MachineShedFred • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

And it’s not just the US - There has been a measurable reduction in bot noise among many secessionist movements across the west, including Poland, Quebec, and Texas.

Re:Good for the US as well…

By echo123 • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

Oh and no matter which side of politics you support, anyone who wants elections in the US to be free, fair and democratic should be opposed to foreign governments and entities using social media bots to influence the outcome of those elections.

Oh, hey! Didja hear about the Saudis and the Emirates and Qatar buying CBS and CNN?

Re:As they say…

By sg_oneill • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

Chernobyl (actually in ukraine but whatever) was really the clusterfuck confluence of a very old design capable of a proper meltdown (modern designs literally can not) , incompetence, and a metric tonne of rotten luck. For modern designs the worst case scenario is Fukushima. An inconvenience not much worse than, say, blowing up an oil refinery, not an environmental omnicatastrophe.

Fukushima on the other hand, only led to MAYBE one death as a result of the accident, and a few handfuls of injuries. with 40 dead as a result of the evacuation, but keep in mind, it was a frigging earthquake, that did most of the damage, not the actual nuclear accident. If anything it showed in the very worst case scenario, destruction of the reactor, the design was safe. You’d have had more deaths if it was an oil refactory, because when THOSE things explode, there are significant deaths just because thats what happens when you blow up explosive fuels.

The real problem with modern nuclear is its just expensive and extremely complicated to get running compared with the cheaper energy from solar, wind, etc. But. the Environmental dangers? We solved that issue decades ago.

Re:As they say…

By AmiMoJo • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

Fukushima was an inconvenience? Half a trillion Euros to clean up, and rising, and at least 200 billion Euros of consequential economic damage. Multiple full meltdowns, at least 51 deaths, and 164,000 residence displaced.

Modern reactors absolutely can melt down. I don’t know where you got that idea from. The new SMR designs can too.

Hackers Heat French Supermarket Fridges, Sparking Fires and Spoiling Food

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Hackers remotely manipulated connected refrigeration systems at hundreds of French supermarkets, reportedly pushing some fridges and freezers to 50C (122F), spoiling food and even sparking fires. According to Reuters, French Prime Minister Sebastien Lecornu ordered a cybersecurity investigation into the hacks, with similar incidents reported in Spain, Portugal, Poland, Germany, and Belgium. In France, Carrefour reported 80 affected stores, Monoprix said 5% of its locations were hit, and Les Mousquetaires said refrigerators at roughly 150 Intermarche stores were heated to 50C for six hours. From the report:
Supermarket cold aisles are typically run by control panels that manage an entire store’s fridges and freezers and can be accessed over the internet, which lets maintenance companies adjust them from anywhere. The source close to Lecornu said ANSSI had identified a vulnerability in software supplied by Danish company Danfoss.

Danfoss said it was “aware of incidents in France affecting a limited number of refrigeration management systems.” The affected units “were running outdated firmware,” Danfoss said, adding that it had “long advised customers to keep supported systems updated with the latest firmware and to migrate legacy systems to current-generation solutions.”

On August 9, cybersecurity firm Claroty’s Team82 published research detailing vulnerabilities in the Danfoss AK-SM 800A controller. According to the report, software updates issued by Danfoss addressed issues that could have allowed attackers to bypass authentication controls and execute code on compromised devices.

They should migrate away from the internet

By Anonymous Coward • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

How stupid can this be? Since when do supermarket refrigerators need to be controlled remotely? It’s a real “WTF” moment.

Stop hooking standalone things to the internet.

By AgTiger • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

From the article: “Supermarket cold aisles are typically run by control panels that manage an entire store’s fridges and freezers and can be accessed over the internet, which lets maintenance companies adjust them from anywhere.”

Well, there’s your problem. Stop doing stupid things like that.

Nice weasel wording

By newslash.formatblows • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread
“aware of incidents in France affecting a limited number of refrigeration management systems.”

That’s reassuring. I was afraid for a minute that an infinite number of refrigerators had been hacked.

Buck passed

By jrq • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
“outdated firmware” - Buck passed. Customer at fault.

Re:Stop hooking standalone things to the internet.

By lucifuge31337 • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

3) Why is it even possible to set a refrigerator to 50C?

You’re making a logical mistake here, assuming it was possible to set them to that temperature. That’s not what the article said was done. It specifically says they raised the temperature to that.

What they’ve most likely done here is activated the reversing valve - a thing that would be normally used for hot gas defrost - and bypassed the defrost termination time and temp sensors.

These things aren’t like your home fridge.

AI Coding Agents Generate More Code, But Not More Software

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
A study of more than 700 software firms found that AI coding agents significantly increase the amount of code developers produce, but not the amount of software companies actually ship. Ars Technica reports:
A recent study (PDF) of actual coding practices across hundreds of firms finds that human code review forms a significant “bottleneck” for the overall efficiency of AI coding tools, resulting in “little evidence that firms increase software output or reduce employment” by using them. Any efficiency increased during the actual coding phase, the study authors find, is “absorbed by downstream constraints in the production process”; as “the code review process significantly increases in length, pull requests are more likely to require revisions, and reviewers leave more comments.”

[…] In terms of raw code being produced, the results are clear and stark. The introduction of AI coding agents at a firm leads to a 30 percent increase in total lines of code generated, a 20 percent rise in the number of total commits, and a 23 percent increase in pull requests on average, the researchers write. But all that extra code doesn’t translate directly into improved software output on the firm level. On the contrary, the resolution rate for Issues and Epics (i.e. wholesale software features) tracked by tools like Jira did not change in a statistically significant way after AI tools were introduced (the researchers also found no “compositional shift” in the size or complexity of those Jira-tracked issues across the AI introduction).

The reason for that discrepancy can be found directly in the code review process, which takes markedly longer on average after the introduction of AI coding agents. Overall, the average “review process” time between a pull request getting submitted and it being merged into the codebase balloons 49 percent on average after AI agents are introduced. That effect can be seen in more granular data, too, with “the share of pull requests with changes requested nearly doubl[ing], and the number of comments per pull request increas[ing] by 35%" following the AI agent shift, the researchers write.

In response to this change, the researchers found a 14 percent increase in the share of workers performing code reviews after AI agents’ introduction. They also write that they “cannot attribute significant employment changes to AI” after looking at total active workers across Jellyfish and cross-referencing with LinkedIn data at those firms. While AI could also theoretically help with this review process, the researchers found that, so far, that impact has been marginal. Although 80 percent of measured firms used some form of AI code review by March 2026, AI agents were only responsible for 23.3 percent of all review comments and 10.8 percent of all pull requests, suggesting humans were still responsible for the vast majority of this work.

next up

By awwshit • • Score: 3 • Thread

The industry will be optimizing AI to produce hard to understand complicated one-liners.

Doing it properly works but is NOT FUN

By greytree • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
We had problems with massive pull requests containing code the submitter does not understand.
The solution is to require developers to fully understand the code they submit, and check that understanding

When you take the time to understand the AI-written code ( often using the AI to explain its own code ), there is no problem and you can proceed significantly faster than without AI.

The problem is that that work to gain understanding is boring.
While I often had to do it in the days before AI, I did not become a programmer to spend all my time understanding code I did not write myself.

I think *that* is the serious problem for our industry.

Re:Shocked

By OrangeTide • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

Working on the code every day myself is what makes it possible for me to review code that people contribute.

If I use AI to write it all, then I don’t internalize the code anymore, and I slowly lose the ability to review it.

Been nice knowing you all, the industry is going to hit a brick wall in part because of reliance on AI in the very stages that should include humans.

Complexity is cancer

By MpVpRb • • Score: 3 • Thread

AI tools easily generate more complexity.
We need better tools to understand, manage and reduce complexity, not tools that allow us to create more.

Another reason for discrepency..

By Junta • • Score: 3 • Thread

Like always, more code != more valuable software behavior.

So you have the AI doing overtly silly things. Someone asked to adjust layout to fix a gap in a webpage. Eventually they submitted their pull request, hundreds and hundreds of lines of CSS. Often the exact same rule repeated 5 times, which I’m guessing is how many rounds the operator went with the system before the gap actually closed. The lines were *mostly* just '!important’ing already existing rules, which had no impact, but hey, worth a shot right? Ultimately I discarded the merge request and made the one-line css tweak that was actually relevant.

Then you have the AI doing… well arguably slightly silly things. Like protecting against an invalid value redundantly throughout a call stack. Arguably defensible, as maybe one day the deep function will be called from somewhere else and passing through the error might not present it with the most informative context.

Finally the AI doing… well things the human should have been doing. With the advent of a lot of code scanning, this is less likely, but things like calling functions in C and charging ahead without ever checking the status of the call. functions that, practically speaking, will likely never fail, however you really *should* be being more defensive about the possibility.

The ‘human review as a bottleneck’ isn’t really the angle I would fixate on. Completely unfettered AI usage also stalls out in many situations. If the AI can’t get there on its own trivially, then it’s going to leave an almost-correct looking mess that isn’t quite there but is very hard to get across the finish line. If the AI can get it, then it’s probably not ‘software being shipped’, because while perhaps slightly better than a generic off-the-shelf existing procedure, probably not worth the trouble to ‘ship’ a solution that largely overlaps with a lot of generic stuff.

Amazon In Talks To Buy AI Startup Decart For Around $7 Billion

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Amazon is reportedly in talks to acquire AI startup Decart in a deal that could value the company at up to $7 billion. Decart’s DOS software helps developers optimize AI models for different processors in weeks rather than months, a capability that could be particularly useful to AWS as it pushes its own Trainium chips. SiliconANGLE reports:
The company has developed software called DOS, which can help developers to speed up AI training and inference workloads by optimizing their neural networks to run on a specific processor. In most AI workloads, developers must optimize a neural network for the chip they plan to run it on. This process used to take months, but with DOS, the workflow necessary to do this can be compressed into just a couple of weeks. As a result, companies can use Decart’s software to shift AI workloads to different processors if their requirements change, or if chip availability becomes an issue.

In addition to DOS, Decart is also a model developer, responsible for creating the Lucy and Oasis world models, which are designed to generate and simulate realistic three-dimensional environments for video games, robotic training and other use cases. It’s still possible another suitor could emerge and outbid Amazon. Last month, Anthropic PBC was reportedly engaged in talks to buy Decart, according to a report by Bloomberg. However, it ultimately pulled out of a reported $6 billion deal after conducting due diligence on the startup. It’s not clear what ultimately dissuaded Anthropic from pursuing a deal.
The Wall Street Journal first reported (paywalled) the news.

That DOS acronym

By AgTiger • • Score: 4, Informative • Thread

Decart’s acronym for DOS is “Decart Optimization Stack”.

Those of us old enough to remember will immediately think “Disk Operating System” though.

Shouldn’t they buy Dehorse first?

By Locke2005 • • Score: 3 • Thread
Never put Decart before Dehorse!

Q3 2026 Was Historically Bad For PC Shipments

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
PC shipments fell 20.1% year over year to 62.7 million units in the third quarter of 2026, the worst Q3 decline IDC has recorded. “The top three PC makers — Lenovo, Dell, and HP — also saw their shipments fall by over 20% year over year,” reports PCMag. From the report:
“If looking at all quarters, then we have seen other quarters in recent years with larger declines, such as 2022Q4, which was -28.2%, and 2023Q1, which was -28.7%. Both were coming off pandemic highs,” IDC Director Jitesh Ubrani told PCMag in an email. The numbers aren’t a great sign, since third-quarter PC shipments usually outpace those in the second quarter as vendors introduce new products ahead of the holiday shopping season. Instead, PC shipments were at 62.7 million units, down 9.1% from the previous quarter.

[…] Of course, the downturn isn’t a surprise. IDC and other research firms have warned that the ongoing AI-driven memory shortage threatens to sap demand for PCs and phones due to soaring memory and storage costs. “What we’re seeing is the result of the strong first half pull-in. Vendors and channels loaded up on inventory early in the year to get ahead of [memory-related] price hikes, and that has thrown off the usual seasonality, where Q3 is typically larger than Q2,” Ubrani said in a report covering IDC’s preliminary estimates for the quarter.

In one bright spot, Ubrani said vendors and retailers might cut prices to generate interest and clear out products they have in stock. “Channels are now worried about carrying too much inventory into a market where high prices are suppressing demand. That could translate into promotions and some short-term relief for consumers, but we don’t expect pricing anywhere near what it was a year ago. Prices will remain elevated,” he added.

You’re All Wrong

By SlashbotAgent • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

You’re all thinking; ‘Yea serves them right for price gouging.’ But, you’d be wrong.

You see Dell PC sales down 20%. But look at what Dell sees:

Q2 2027 (Reported July 2026)
Record revenue of $47.0 billion, up 58% year over year
Record diluted earnings per share (EPS) of $6.34, up 273% year over year, and record non-GAAP diluted EPS of $7.04, up 203%
Cash flow from operations of $2.2 billion
Full-year FY27 revenue guidance of $192.0 billion, up 69% year over year
Full-year FY27 EPS guidance of $24.37 and non-GAAP EPS guidance of $25.50, up 181% and 148% year over year, respectively

Best fucking quarter EVAR!!!!

Then they raised their forecast and the stock went ballistic.

https://investors.delltechnolo…

Re:Does Windows 11 still run on PCs

By slaker • • Score: 4, Informative • Thread

It’s highly unlikely that anything you’d do in the course of normal desktop use would make much of a subjective difference from a SATA SSD to an NVMe drive. Most sustained IO operations don’t take so long that you’ll realize the difference. I can tell when I’m copying 30GB files from my camera card or doing full database dumps, but for just loading up a game or booting an OS? They’re subjectively almost exactly the same experience.

That being said, there is such a thing as a cacheless drive. SSDs used to have a certain amount of DRAM or SLC NAND as a faster intermediary interface for storage. Low-cost drives might not have THAT, and that seriously reduces the utility of the SSD in the first place, especially on no-name drives. Those guys are sometimes no better than mechanical drives. Since your system is a refurb, it’s possible they did just stick a POS drive in.

Lift the tariffs

By backslashdot • • Score: 3 • Thread

Lift the tariffs you morons.

Re:It’s inevitable.

By butt0nm4n • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread

You and me brother. I am up for a shit-in anytime. I’ll get some Indian food in and some prunes. We can Jackson Pollock our dissent.

Wrong take.

By Petersko • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

The story isn’t that sales have fallen 20%. It’s that 80% of the demand still exists.

What we’ve really taught these companies is that they’ve traditionally undervalued their products, and if component prices return to “normal” there is no reason at all that retail prices need to track it. The supply side has all the power, and they know it now.

The new normal sucks.

Should We Beware of Other License Plate Surveillance Companies Besides Flock?

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
NPR reports:
Police officers in cities across the U.S. are quick to extol the virtues of real-time crime centers as a game changer that helps them find missing children, monitor large events from the skies and scope out dangerous scenes before putting an officer in harm’s way. Hundreds of police departments have one of these central hubs, which have existed for years. But many are now being powered with AI software, such as Fusus, from the public-safety technology giant Axon… synthesizing the data it pulls in and allowing police command centers to watch an entire city from one place.

Flock cameras, the automated license plate readers (ALPRs), have faced intense backlash in recent months amid stories of abuse. Yet privacy experts say they’re just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to police surveillance. “I have been watching the debate about Flock with a little bit of puzzlement,” says Andrew Guthrie Ferguson, a law professor at George Washington University. “Because real-time crime centers have not just ALPR cameras and sensors, but video analytics and drones and essentially a way to create a visual single-pane-of-glass vision of what’s going on in a city, with time machine capabilities where you can go back and investigate crime.” Tools like Axon Fusus, which is a leader in this type of software, also pull in footage and data from police body cameras, law enforcement dashcams, 911 dispatch, gunshot detectors and surveillance cameras, including sometimes those of private businesses that opt in. Its use is growing fast. In 2024, the technology news site 404 Media reported that just over 100 law enforcement agencies had deployed Fusus, which was then its own company and was acquired by Axon that year. The number of law enforcement agencies using the tool has more than doubled since then, according to Axon.
Even the American Civil Liberties Union warned concerned citizens in August that "Flock is far from the only vendor,” adding that “it’s important to realize that its competitors aren’t so great either, and that simply replacing Flock surveillance with another company’s surveillance won’t necessarily solve any of the privacy and other civil liberties problems posed by this mass surveillance technology.”
Communities can’t simply assume that their residents will be better off from a privacy and civil liberties perspective by dropping Flock and replacing it with another ALPR provider, as some customers have done. They should ask hard questions about whether they really want to create that kind of a system, and if they do, ensure it doesn’t function as a mass surveillance system…

One of Flock’s most significant competitors is Motorola. This company, which has been expanding its police technology offerings through an aggressive acquisition strategy in recent years, offers a nationwide law enforcement data sharing system similar to Flock’s called the National Vehicle Location Service, operated by Motorola unit Vigilant Solutions. In addition to collecting data from law enforcement clients’ cameras, it also runs a large separate commercial ALPR unit that makes deals for tow trucks and other fleet vehicles to carry cameras and collect data for Motorola as they drive around, amassing billions of plate reads (a claimed 500 million monthly, subject to no apparent data retention policy). Known as the Digital Recognition Network, that unit sells its data for commercial purposes but also makes it available to its law enforcement customers for an extra charge. Motorola tells agencies they can have “access to billions of detections beyond your own.”
Abandoning Flock for another system doesn’t protect privacy, their article argues. “If a jurisdiction decides to allow license scanners to be installed, how that system operates is more important than which vendor provides it…” They recommend strong restrictions like data retention limits — and imposing them by law rather than in the language of contracts with vendors (which could always be renegotiated).

Yes because despite what cowards think

By Inglix the Mad • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
1984 wasn’t supposed to be an instruction manual.

We should also be keeping an eye out for them adding, or separately mounting, corollary surveillance items.

We already see Flock, and I’ll guarantee other vendors are looking to add it as well, SIGINT to the cameras. That means even if they can’t see your plate, or even your car very well because you rented a trailer, they can track you by WiFi/Bluetooth to a few feet.

We should also be keeping an eye out for them to roll out facial recognition integration. They have it all set to go, and may even have live near you. Axon has it. ACTi sells long range zoom cameras with it. There are even vendors that add it to Flock as a software layer..

There are a few thing we should do:
1) Make it a state felony worth a 5-10 years in prison for law enforcement to abuse the cameras. No warrant? Congrats snowflake you just caught a MINIMUM 5 year sentence in prison with no early release option. When they whine about the penalty, remind them that they say you need hefty punishments to deter crime. When they inevitably whine about the warrant remind them they say “this isn’t mass surveillance” and “this isn’t real-time surveillance” so waiting a few minutes on the phone to personally affirm to the judge under penalty of perjury isn’t a big deal. You’re only looking backward in time.
2) Put vendors on the hook for not following data retention / sharing limitation standards. That latest update flipped a switch that changed a customer’s share settings? Congratulations snowflake, you just caught a fine worth 10 times the original contract, per day.
3) Make it illegal to repackage and sell ANY data from the cameras, or other sensors, to anyone. I mean, seriously folks, how long do you think it will take for the companies to start selling? That is, if they aren’t already under the table.

Police and many politicians will whine. You can be dang sure the companies will screech loud to the Calvinball Court. I don’t care. Not only is this stuff reek of fascism it’s a national security nightmare.

Re:They aren’t the problem

By Inglix the Mad • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
These aren’t supposed to be real-time surveillance, remember? That’s the Flock, and other, ALPR out for these things. The moment they admit they’re real-time tracking is the day every single one of these cameras is ripped out under precedent that the government doesn’t get to track everyone in public on the off-chance of catching a criminal.

Double that when it includes facial recognition and SIGINT.

Beware! And I MEAN IT!

By Eric Freyhart • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
I worked for “one” of these companies. You have no idea (and it is designed that way) how many of these systems exist or where they are located. Flock cameras are made to be easily seen. Others are designed to be hidden from public view. And they can track you 24/7 using a form of AI that can put the data points together to form a complete picture of your daily routine. They know where you work, what you purchase, where you get your meds, where you go to the doctor, what you’re going to the doctor for, and if you are unlucky and doing something you shouldn’t (like a side girl), you are screwed already.

Re:They aren’t the problem

By drinkypoo • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

These aren’t supposed to be real-time surveillance, remember? That’s the Flock, and other, ALPR out for these things. The moment they admit they’re real-time tracking is the day every single one of these cameras is ripped out

Anyone who wants to know can look right now and find out that yes, the Flock cameras are always watching. But since they don’t belong to the government, that’s legal. You might argue that it shouldn’t be, that if they’re just turning around and handing the data to the police on any request (that is, without a warrant) then they are effectively functioning as a part of the police department. And in that case I would agree, but so far courts have permitted that to continue.

under precedent that the government doesn’t get to track everyone in public on the off-chance of catching a criminal

Yeah, but again, so far if a private company is doing it and then giving the data to the cops, it’s not government surveillance. An even worse example of such a partnership is that the US Postal Service hands all of the mailpiece scanning data to the FBI. The feds are logging 100% of our snail mail metadata, and tracking who is sending what (type of mail) to who. All backbones are monitored and a percentage of traffic can be sampled in realtime, Never forget QWest. Need I go on? The government is spying on us in every way, both directly and indirectly. Most people are fully head-up-ass about it so they don’t have to think about it.

Abos-fucking-lutely!!!!

By SlashbotAgent • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

All of them, all of them, take us down the same road to the same destination.

Flock caught everyone’s attention because they used prominent and easily recognizable devices popping up everywhere. Then we realized their shitty behavior and the shitty behavior of authorities that Flock facilitated. At our expense, I might add. So Flock is getting all of the attention, right now.

But, Axon, Motorola, et al are all pushing the same products and services. Their equipment blends into our daily lives a bit more so they are less noticed. But they are all striving to dominate the market that Flock is spotlighting and they are all a massive threat. They’ll soon be connecting into DOT cameras on highways and every traffic light. Assuming that they haven’t already.

All of these vendors and their products or services are a massive threat. All. Of. Them.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?…

How the US Nuclear Plant Fleet Is Leaning Into AI

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
“This year, nearly the entire fleet of 94 U.S. nuclear reactors has been offered the chance to integrate AI into its operations, and most have taken it,” reports IEEE Spectrum:
In August, California-based Atomic Canyon launched NIVA, the Nuclear Industry Virtual Assistant, which was developed in cooperation with nuclear-industry groups. The assistant was pilot-tested in nuclear plants run by Constellation Energy and is now available to the United States’ entire fleet of reactors.... Meanwhile, the AI-for-nuclear startup Nuclearn says its products have gone to work with more than 65 U.S. partners, a total that includes many traditional plants but also an integration with NuScale Power Corp. that is working toward advanced small nuclear reactors. Microsoft and Nvidia have collaborated on a project to apply AI toward optimizing “the entire life cycle of a nuclear plant, spanning site permitting, design, construction, and continuous operations.”

The reason for the rapid adoption, according to Nuclearn CFO and cofounder Jerrold Vincent, is twofold. First, the technology companies banking their futures on AI are also keen on a revival of nuclear power to provide the electricity for all those data centers. Vincent says AI is also ideal for addressing some of the nuclear industry’s most pressing problems. Many of the things that make reactors so difficult to operate — intricate regulations, along with complex systems for management and maintenance — are exactly the kinds of tasks that AI is good at. The industry is staggering to deal with aging hardware and an aging workforce. If it is going to survive, and have a real shot at a nuclear revival, it will need help from machine intelligence, Vincent says…

Right now, the principal output of a nuclear reactor (aside from electricity) is paperwork. Nuclear plants produce piles of documentation to demonstrate regulatory compliance and to record how they respond to any potential problem, from a crack in the sidewalk to a fault in the reactor… Nuclearn’s AI products help plants search through large repositories of data more efficiently to more quickly file paperwork with the federal government or figure out how a particular problem was solved in the past. “If you think of it as ChatGPT for nuclear,” he says, “it’s actually not a bad place to start.”
It’s especially important because the nuclear power industry “has a remarkably skilled but quickly shrinking workforce tasked with keeping old reactors online and possibly starting up new ones to meet surging demand for electricity,” the article points out.

It also stresses that “So far, both the Nuclearn and NIVA large language models used in the nuclear world report to humans and don’t go anywhere near power plant operations.”

A computer can never be held accountable

By sinkskinkshrieks • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
Therefore a computer must never make a management decision.

Good grief

By 93 Escort Wagon • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

If any story ever deseved a #whatcouldpossiblygowrong tag - this is it.

What could possibly go wrong?

By engineer37 • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread
You’re right, I should not have lowered the coolant levels. I should be honest, I caused a meltdown and that’s on me. Thank you for pushing back on this!

More Slop Summaries

By Aighearach • • Score: 3 • Thread

So much BS in this fake story. Nvidia and Microsoft didn’t do any of the stuff listed; those are merely the aspirational goals listed in the mission statement of a collaboration that is just studying the issue.

And the US nuclear industry (it’s not a “fleet,” what language did they translate the source from that uses that language?) isn’t “leaning into AI.” A miniature software startup merely released an app and said then said “now it’s available to everybody” while trying to drum up sales.

One legit nuclear operator did a “pilot test” but that shouldn’t be taken to imply that it did actual work; it duplicated work that’s required by law to be done by qualified personnel.

And then the language changes; the companies “products” have “gone to work with more than 65 US partners.” So, 66 then? I mean, they know what the number is, right? And it doesn’t say the product in the story is used by 66 US companies. They use this wishy-washy language, “gone to work with.” So they have some other product that is used by 1 customer, and that customer is some sort of service provider with 65 customers. Presumably.

What a load.

Well, that’s just terrible.

By fuzzyfuzzyfungus • • Score: 3 • Thread
There are probably literally worse uses; but ‘compliance’ seems like an exceptionally bad place for a system that effortlessly produces high-plausibility/low-information text walls; and lies relatively frequently but at unpredictable intervals.

It often gets proposed for the purpose; either by people who overestimate it or with that little sneer at ‘paperwork’ that assumes that plausible nonsense is fine because whatever the ‘paperwork’ is it must be a fake problem imposed for stupid reasons, so it really deserves syntactically plausible nonsense; but is an exquisitely bad solution. Not only does it replace actual data with plausible nonsense in places where, surprise surprise, someone was actually maintaining records because something matters; but lowering the cost of bullshitting a report to close to zero removes one of the main incentives for process improvement.

If bad process hurts you can only really maintain it through fairly disciplined commitment to an oppressive, unreasonable, management approach that rejects process improvements out of hand; or the cultivation of a profoundly dysfunctional organizational culture where as many FTEs as possible owe their paychecks to nonsense requirements and can be recruited to defend them.

If bad process just means spinning up the nonsense printer with a cynical smirk; why bother even looking at what the process was intended to do; or getting your hands dirty with what records are important and what records are just historical accretion? Just prompt for a prompt that tells the bot to do them all, and some extras if you want to look diligent, and call it good.

Let’s Encrypt to Cut SSL Certificate Lifetimes to 64 Days in February 2027

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot
Let’s Encrypt “will shorten the default validity period of its TLS certificates from 90 days to 64 days, starting February 10, 2027,” reports the blog Linuxiac:
All certificates issued or renewed from that date will have a 64-day lifespan unless users explicitly select one of the shorter options already available: 45 or six days.

Existing certificates will remain valid until their expiration dates. Let’s Encrypt expects the final 90-day certificate to expire on May 11, 2027. The organization also confirmed no valid certificates will be revoked during the transition. To help administrators prepare, Let’s Encrypt will introduce 64-day certificates in its staging environment on October 14, 2026, allowing users to test their renewal setups before the change reaches production.

The move is part of a broader effort to improve web security by reducing how long compromised or incorrectly issued certificates remain usable… Looking further ahead, the organization plans to reduce the default certificate lifetime again, this time to 45 days in 2028. That makes the upcoming 64-day limit an intermediate step rather than the final destination.
“Administrators using cron jobs or scripts with hardcoded renewal intervals should review their configurations,” the article suggests.

“Another upcoming change concerns domain validation. Let’s Encrypt will reduce the period during which a previously completed domain authorization can be reused from 30 days to 10 days. In 2028, that period will shrink further to just seven hours.”

Re:Very Annoying

By SoonerPet • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
Our problem is we have several systems that use SSL for internal network authentication, but there is no way to automate them. We have phone system hardware that requires an SSL cert to communicate with the handsets around the office, but we have to go into a web interface on it to copy and paste the cert each year. We have the same thing for an internal camera/security system, same thing for a badge system. All of these things are local, not on the internet, yet require SSL certs for internal authentication with clients, and no way to automate these as they are just stand alone devices. As it is it’s a pain in the ass to update them, but if we have to do this on a monthly basis it’s just absurd.

Not short enough

By backslashdot • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

64 seconds ought to be good for anybody. Especially if the website is running node JS the certificate can expire midway during library download.

Re: Very Annoying

By tlhIngan • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

Sounds like theres a need for an easy automation solution.

The problem isn’t the automation, it’s when the automation fails. Do you remember how to fix the certificate manually? Or do you rely on the automated tool to never fail, and it just did?

It’s easy if it’s regularly practiced or someone documented the steps, but it’s rarely going to be practiced (likely forgotten if the automation works for years) and documentation gets lost. It might be in a great spot in the IT wiki and IT documentation, but that gets forgotten about as platforms migrate. People also leave.

Suddenly, the automation fails. Maybe it got a bad certificate from the CA. Or maybe a parameter changed that triggered some unforseen bug in the automation. or an update was run that had a bug when used in the environment. Now it fails. And you’re screwed, because no one knows how to fix it.

Automation works, until it doesn’t. Then things that were relying on it break. Maybe you’re lucky and you catch things breaking early to realize what is happening. But chances are, one day you’ll try to log in, and you’ll get a big “Certificate Expired” screen on the browser and suddenly your VM clusters are inaccessible because they don’t have valid certs (seen this happen with openvirt) and the company is at a standstill becauze nothing works.

The danger of automation isn’t when it works. It’s when it doesn’t and no human has touched the system in years because of it and tribal knowledge has dissipated in the winds, documentation is lost, and no one remembers how the system worked.

DANE or GTFO

By Arnonyrnous Covvard • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

All browser makers are united against DANE, because supporting it would dismantle their certificate gatekeeping. Instead they keep lowering the maximum certificate lifetime to make sure that nobody can host a web page unless they check in with them every few weeks.

Re: Very Annoying

By _merlin • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

The trouble with really short expiries is you have a lot less time to fix issues before everything breaks. With 90 day expiries, you can comfortably renew your certificates two weeks before expiry, giving you plenty of time to sort out any issues before things break. With the 7-day expiries they’re pushing for, you’ve got almost no time between scheduled renewal and certificate expiry to get stuff sorted out when things inevitably go wrong. The point of the really short expiries seems to be to compensate for revocation being under-utilised or something. But are there any real-world issues with 90-day certificates? Also, I really don’t trust the certbot scripts very much. It’s a lot of code I don’t trust to allow running as root if I want to allow automated scripted renewal. Right now I run certbot as an unprivileged user and manually install the updated certificates and bounce services. That’s going to become impractical as they make expiries shorter. And that’s before you consider all the devices that don’t make automation practical. Lots of devices have embedded servers.