Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. The Space-Based Data Center Hype Machine Is Already In Orbit
  2. SpaceX Reportedly Has an AI Device Prototype
  3. US Home Battery Installations Hit Record High On Rising Electricity Costs
  4. T-Mobile Appears To Be Quitting VMware Amid Support Rights Lawsuit With Broadcom
  5. Meta Is Reportedly Building Its Own Cloud Business
  6. Cloudflare Pushes AI Companies To Pay For Publishers’ Content
  7. Scientists Made a Cell From Scratch For First Time
  8. Reddit Will Require You To Log In To Use Old Reddit
  9. Sony PlayStation Will Stop Releasing Games On Discs In 2028
  10. Meta Loses Bid To Dismiss US States’ Claims That Facebook, Instagram Addict Children
  11. NASA Wants To Send Spare Nuclear-Powered Mars Rover To the Moon
  12. The Vera Rubin Telescope Begins Surveying Our Cosmos
  13. DOT Announces ‘Return of Supersonic Flight’ For Commercial Airlines
  14. Trump Drops Restrictions On Anthropic’s Mythos and Fable Models
  15. New Florida Law Bans Local Net-Zero Emissions Policies

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

The Space-Based Data Center Hype Machine Is Already In Orbit

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
IEEE Spectrum argues that orbital data centers remain far from economically or technically practical despite Elon Musk’s prediction that space will become the cheapest place to run AI within a few years. Deploying SpaceX’s proposed million-satellite constellation would require enormous increases in launch and manufacturing capacity, while cooling, radiation, maintenance, latency, orbital debris, and astronomical interference present major unresolved obstacles. Longtime Slashdot reader xetdog shares the report:
Consider this: There are roughly 14,500 active satellites in orbit. Musk’s Starlink constellation accounts for about two thirds of those. Both the launch cadences and satellite-manufacturing capacity would have to scale up astronomically to deploy a million orbital data center satellites. For context, there have been roughly 7,000 orbital launches in all of human history. To loft 1 million satellites into low Earth orbit on SpaceX’s Starship, which is designed to carry up to 60 satellites per vehicle, would require 16,666 launches exclusively devoted to satellite deployments. Considering that SpaceX launched a record 165 orbital missions in 2025, even at 10 times that cadence, it would take a decade. And how long would it take to build 1 million satellites, given Starlink’s current pace of around 4,000 per year and a generous tenfold increase in capacity? Short of a manufacturing revolution, try 25 years.
Dissipating heat in space also requires enormous radiators. As IEEE Spectrum editor Dina Genkina noted, startup Starcloud has sent only one Nvidia H100 GPU into orbit, and “their radiator was too weak to let the chip run at full power.” A single 700-watt H100 would require about 1.4 square meters of radiator area, while a 100-megawatt data center could need 2,500 radiators measuring 80 square meters each.

So, why are the hyperscalers hyping orbital data centers? Answer: because it’s lucrative. “The Elon Musk part of it is honestly genius because he’s got xAI building the data centers, SpaceX sending them to space, and Tesla building solar panels,” Genkina says. “It’s almost like he’s paying himself.”

So basically…

By DrXym • Score: 3 Thread
… it’s just another pack of lies like everything else Musk hypes up.

SpaceX Reportedly Has an AI Device Prototype

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
According to the Wall Street Journal, SpaceX showed investors an early prototype of a slim, “handset-like” AI device running a proprietary operating system and integrating xAI technology. Elon Musk, however, denied the report, calling it "utterly false.” TechCrunch reports:
SpaceX, alongside sister company Tesla, does have the manufacturing expertise to pull off mass-producing a bunch of AI devices — not to mention access to the chips needed to power any on-device compute. SpaceX has also signaled that it’s keen to expand into wireless, with Starlink Mobile as a potential competitor to Verizon and AT&T. One analyst even went as far as to speculate that T-Mobile or AT&T would make fine acquisition targets for the rocket builder, though such a purchase would, undoubtedly, be pricey.

It’s also not clear if SpaceX is just throwing spaghetti at the wall or if it will attempt to really mass-produce and market such a device. But one thing that seems clearer is that if OpenAI is doing it, Musk would, perhaps, want to try to do it better. […]

Like OpenAI, SpaceX’s prototype is reportedly designed to run on a proprietary operating system and integrate technology from xAI, Musk’s AI company that SpaceX acquired earlier this year. This would prevent these new devices from being trapped inside another company’s platforms (like Google’s Android). But the intent also appears to be to create something new, with native AI interfaces. That said, the graveyard is crowded with the unsuccessful launches of AI devices from companies like Humane and Rabbit. A company wanting to sell an AI device does not equate to consumers wanting to buy such a thing. Yet.

AI

By ledow • Score: 3 Thread

Gosh, that must be worth at least a trillion dollars.

Better scramble and invest in their hype of… a handheld box that can run AI… like… phones do.

Musky apples

By fluffernutter • Score: 3 Thread
I guess Musk finally figured out that too many people figured out he tells bold-faced lies about great things he will make so now he is following the “Apple leak” playbook?

US Home Battery Installations Hit Record High On Rising Electricity Costs

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica:
US homeowners have embraced home batteries in record-breaking numbers in early 2026, spurred on by state incentives while seeking to offset rising residential electricity costs. The trend could even unlock a more flexible energy supply for power grid operators and even AI data centers. New home battery installations reached a record 673 megawatts of energy storage in the first quarter of 2026, according to the US Energy Information Administration. That trend was driven by states with high electricity prices that have implemented policies to incentivize home battery installation, Bloomberg News reported.

This residential battery trend stands out as a natural next step for states that have already successfully boosted rooftop solar adoption among homeowners, given how batteries enable homeowners to use stored solar energy at night. California and Hawaii accounted for the majority of new residential battery storage, while Texas and Arizona also saw significantly higher numbers of installations. California incentivizes homeowners with solar panels to also install batteries by offering better pricing for residential electricity exported to the grid after sunset, Bloomberg reported. Hawaii offers a one-time payment of $400 for every kilowatt of battery storage that homeowners install.

However, the record-breaking home battery installations coincided with a slowdown in residential installations of solar panels — the result of the Trump administration and Republican-driven One Big Beautiful Bill having eliminated a 30 percent federal solar tax credit for homeowners. Nonetheless, US electricity generation from solar power continues to rise and even surpassed coal-fired generation in April. The battery installation spree also coincides with rising electricity costs for US residential customers. The Energy Information Administration’s latest data shows that the nationwide average for residential electricity costs increased by more than 7 percent in April 2026 when compared to electricity costs in April 2025. So homeowners with smart home battery-management systems could benefit from storing energy when electricity prices are lowest and draining them during peak demand periods.

The reason I got it

By OrangeTide • Score: 3 Thread

It got a lot cheaper compared to what it cost 5 years ago. Also, for people who don’t have net metering, it’s often (always?) better to charge your own battery than sell solar back to the power company.

Re:Kilowatt

By dsgrntlxmply • Score: 5, Informative Thread
It looks like abridged reporting. A quick search suggests that it is a one time payment of $400 / kW capacity feedable back to the grid for a 2 hour interval daily, with a contractual commitment of some number of years. BYOD Plus

T-Mobile Appears To Be Quitting VMware Amid Support Rights Lawsuit With Broadcom

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
T-Mobile appears to be migrating its 303,000-core VMware environment to another platform while fighting Broadcom in court for the extended support it says its perpetual-license agreement guarantees. “The matter is somewhat urgent,” The Register reports, because a court-ordered support arrangement expires August 3, “so T-Mobile may soon be unable to get support for its very substantial VMware estate.” The Register reports:
The dispute relates to a deal T-Mobile struck with VMware in August 2023, which saw the telco acquire perpetual licenses and two years of support for some software, plus the option for a further year of support. When Broadcom acquired VMware in 2023, it stopped selling perpetual licenses and standalone support deals for customers with those licenses. Broadcom also reduced the virtualization giant’s product range from over 150 products to two subscription-only bundles. Broadcom now mostly sells its Cloud Foundation (VCF) private cloud suite. Customers including AT&T and Tesco tried to exercise their right to extended support, but Broadcom declined to do so. AT&T settled on confidential terms. Tesco is pursuing the matter in the courts.

When customers exercise their option for extended support, Broadcom argues it can’t deliver because the products covered by the contract don’t exist anymore, its contracts allow it to deny support for dead products, and subscriptions are now the industry standard. T-Mobile started using VMware’s products in 2008. In one hearing, the carrier’s counsel described T-Mobile’s VMware implementation as “the base of the entire internal network” and “the place where 1,000 applications reside.” Another filing, from Broadcom, says the telco runs VMware software on over 303,000 CPU cores.

Court documents allege that in 2024 Broadcom notified T-Mobile it would not renew support after the initial two-year deal expired in 2025. The two parties kept talking about possible new arrangements. T-Mobile also sought an injunction that would compel Broadcom to provide extended support. Broadcom opposed the injunction, arguing that T-Mobile deliberately waited too long to seek it. At one point T-Mobile suggested a $20 million deal for another two years of support. An affirmation filed last week by T-Mobile vice president of technology Kevin Luu says the carrier sought that arrangement “to be able to complete T-Mobile’s transition away from VMware at a more deliberate pace.”

The court eventually granted the injunction forcing Broadcom to offer support beyond August 2025, but required T-Mobile to pay $5.28 million and post a $500,000 undertaking. Broadcom continued to provide support but also sought damages on grounds that the injunction meant it missed out on a new deal with T-Mobile. The telco has rubbished that argument in part because the two parties were still talking about a new deal. Broadcom later proposed to charge $24 million for extended support covering six products, a sum it said would cover over 20 staff needed to support T-Mobile. The carrier fired back by pointing out that it has made just two support calls in 2026, which hardly justifies such a massive staff and expense.

Get off of VMWARE ASAP, but be warned

By williamyf • Score: 5, Informative Thread

VMWare is more than virtualization.

OpenStack technical trainer here:

If you think of VMWare in 2026 as virtualization only solution, like we still are in 2006, then sure, KVM, or QUEMU, Xen, BSD’s VMM, or Hyper-V are cromulent options.

But nowadays, VMWare, XenServer/Xencloud, on Premises Azure et al are used to make Private Clouds, or the fleets running on them use a few advanced functions beyond virtualization, with all that implies. Very few workloads are “virtualization only”, not touching any of the advanced or the cloud-dy functions .

The linux equivalent would be OpenStack, with all the load that implies.

And yes, many of the FOSS solutions run KVM under the hood, with a few exceptions like Xen based ones, or BSD’s vmm and vmmd, but again, what really counts in 2026 is not the Hypervisor, but all the other advanced stuff built atop of it.

There is another aspect in this too, and it is Application support. Many ISVs certify their platforms/apps on specific OSs/Distros running on Specific Hypervisors.

So, for instance, your ISV may say: Only Windows Server 2022 or 2025 only, RHEL 10, or Suse 16, on top of VMWare, Openstack or Azure.

And there you are, for those workloads, you can forget about all the other solutions (obscure or not) that homelabbers love to peddle. Big corpos can pressure smaller ISVs to support their preferred solution, but the big ISVs will most likely put a few options on offer, and that’s it.

In those cases, large intitutions (like T-Mobile, the focus of the article) have 100s or even 1000s of ISVs some more crititcal than others, and they need to reach commonality of solutions, or personel requirements ballon (the legacy VMWare group, the Openstack group, the XenCloud group, the ProxMox group, the Azure group, the Nutanix group, the....) along with all the other support functions (negotiations and keeping track of support contracts for each technology). A veritable nightmare. So, unlike homelabbers, Big corpos will probably go to a one or two vendor solution for their internal clouds.

Since VMWare was the leader, and for many lustres a model citizen, pretty muche every single ISV offered them as a supported option, therfore, it was the easier default.

So, get out of VMWare ASAP, but be warned it will be hard, as you need to provide alternatives to the advanced functions, and align certification requirements for support.

Also, use this as a clean-up opportunity . Retire redundant APPs, retire inhouse stuff with big technical debt, move it to either functions inside SW you already own (even if they are not completely taylor made) or to SaaS. That way your VM stable will be smaller, migration will be faster and easier, and the bill from whatever replaces VMWare will be “even moar” cheaper.

Broadcom told us all it was going to scam us…

By MikeDataLink • Score: 5, Informative Thread

They didn’t even try to hide it. They were very public about this acquisition being about milking their customer base who would not be able to migrate away in time to avoid paying them.

My company ditched VMware within 3 months of the announcement. We moved with all deliberate speed to Proxmox and to be honest, we’re happier there. Wish they had forced us sooner.

Oh the irony! Hurt Corpos hurt Corpos

By Jumperalex • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Broadcom: We are altering the deal. Pray we do not alter it further
T-Mobile: Fuck you we’re leaving
Also T-Mobile: We’re cancelling all legacy phone contracts despite promising we wouldn’t.

‘Pharma Bro’ Martin Shkreli modus operandi

By Gavino • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Broadcom are the tech equivalent of ‘Pharma Bro’ Martin Shkreli, who became infamous and earned the nickname after he hiked the price of a potentially lifesaving antiparasitic medication in 2015.

Pharma bro logic: The people who pay the massive price hikes will be more than enough to offset the people who die because they cannot afford the medication, and this short-term revenue boost will cover the purchase price, and from that point on it’s all free money.
Broadcom bro logic: The companies who pay the massive price hikes will be more than enough to offset the companies who leave because they cannot afford the subscription, and this short-term revenue boost will cover the purchase price, and from that point on it’s all free money.

It’s the exact same playbook.

Re:Everyone Saw This Coming

By grasshoppa • Score: 4, Informative Thread

I guarantee there’s someone, or a few someones, at t-mobile who saw this coming. They’re mid level support or engineers. I’m sure they were screaming to all that they could find about what was coming, but upper management and the powers that be ignored them. None could confront the mass migration that was necessary if this group of someones were right, so they must be wrong.

Until they weren’t.

And so this group will be rewarded with all the shit-work needed to get the migration done, while the very same people that ignored the timebomb ticking in their closet will be rewarded for their “vision” and “decisiveness”.

God I don’t miss corporate.

Meta Is Reportedly Building Its Own Cloud Business

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Meta is reportedly developing its own cloud business that could sell access to its AI models and lease data-center computing capacity to other companies. The move would put Meta in direct competition with Amazon, Google, and SpaceX. Engadget reports:
The cloud business could offer multiple services, according to [Bloomberg], like selling access to AI models run on Meta’s infrastructure, or leasing the computing power of its data centers to other companies looking to train AI. Offering something akin to Amazon Web Services could help make back some of what Meta has already spent on its new bet. As part of its AI plans, the company has committed to investing $600 billion in the US by 2028. Meta has also already made more than a few expensive hires to build its AI superintelligence team. Meta Compute, the data center and AI-focused initiative Meta created in January, is currently developing the new cloud business, according to Bloomberg.

Whoops spent too much money

By hsmith • Score: 3 Thread
Now they need to figure out how to recover some. Brilliant work Mark.

Who cares?

By Valgrus Thunderaxe • Score: 3 Thread
Like literally, who cares Meta is building a “cloud business” (whatever that means).

I have an idea!

By paul_engr • Score: 5, Funny Thread
Build it in the metaverse!

Late to the party

By DrXym • Score: 3 Thread
Anyone not already on Azure / AWS / Google sure as fuck isn’t going to use Meta. And with Europeans looking to use sovereign cloud providers, and likely the same happening elsewhere there might be a move away from US providers entirely.

Cloudflare Pushes AI Companies To Pay For Publishers’ Content

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
BrianFagioli writes:
Cloudflare announced new controls that give publishers more say over how AI companies access and use their content. Beginning September 15, new Cloudflare sites will allow traditional search indexing while blocking AI training and AI agent access on ad supported pages by default. The company is also expanding its monetization efforts with a Pay-Per-Use model that aims to compensate publishers when their content contributes to AI generated answers rather than simply being crawled. Cloudflare argues that publishers should not have to choose between being discoverable online and giving away their work for free to AI systems.

Annoying as F

By SuperDre • Score: 3 Thread
These days Cloudfare is one of those brands that really annoy me as f. They make our internet experience even worse these days, just below the cookiewall....

Have they solved the stack overflow apocalypse?

By rsilvergun • Score: 3 Thread
I’ve used chat GTP a bit and 99% of its responses are pretty obviously coming from old stack overflow posts. The problem is there is a lot less traffic on stack overflow because all the programmers are using chat GTP.

When AI has to rely on the raw documentation for a technology, documentation that is almost always written overseas by people who don’t speak whatever language the documentation is written in natively because fuck if a company is going to pay for documentation, the end results are pretty terrible and pretty useless. It’s really just summarizing the doc. Occasionally if the documents are a meandering mess it can be useful because it’ll pick out the piece of information you want out of hundreds of HTML pages spread across the internet but for the most part worthless.

So it’s all the training material gets cut off from AI how are they going to keep it up to date? Is there some trick I don’t know about? I don’t think you can just pointed it code and have it magically work it’s got to have context.

Re: Annoying as F

By allo • Score: 4, Informative Thread

That’s the neat part: You don’t.

A webhoster decides they have too much traffic and firewall everyone but Cloudflare. Then Cloudflare is a proxy to their website and they put the Cloudflare IPs in the DNS. Cloudflare shows everyone captchas and the webhoster doesn’t get that much traffic because of caching at the Cloudflare server and users not being motivated to solve captchas.

Nice side effect: Cloudflare gets to read all traffic, as it decrypts and reencrypts it to enable caching and relaying a copy to the NSA.

wah we cant steal your content to profit of

By Growlley • Score: 3 Thread
why do you hate captialism?

Scientists Made a Cell From Scratch For First Time

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
AleRunner writes:
The first fully synthetic cell ("SpudCell") has been created in the Department of Genetics at the University of Minnesota. Strictly speaking, it’s described as a “cell-like system constructed entirely from known chemical components that can perform a complete cell cycle.” It is able to replicate, but only for approximately five generations.

The key advance is that the cell is “built entirely bottom-up from individually purified, non-living components,” although it still contains material from E. coli bacteria. “PURE is a defined mixture of 36 purified enzymes from E. coli bacteria,” including ribosomes, that provides the infrastructure for genetic replication.

CNN has an article on the advance, including interview material with Professor Kate Adamala, who led the research. “I know the full ingredient list of the cell. I know exactly what chemicals, what molecules, at what concentrations,” she said. “It is fully defined, which means we can engineer it.”
“Humans did not create life,” notes an anonymous Slashdot reader. “Researchers call it a constructed cell, not ‘life created in the lab’ but a ‘genuine milestone on the road toward that question.’ It lacks full autonomy (needs feeding, no independent evolution).”

Special thanks to Slashdot readers kemosabi and AleRunner for submitting the story and additional sources, including reports from The New York Times and The Guardian, as well as information from the University of Minnesota Twin Cities.

Re: Self-healing materials

By jddj • Score: 4, Informative Thread

“sealing/gaskets”

Worked the other way in The Andromeda Strain.

Re:This is the plot for “The Blob”, isn’t it?

By TWX • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

I didn’t get the feeling that the GP post was claiming it was valueless. I got the feeling that the concern was it would get out of the control of its creators, manage to mutate or evolve past a death in five generations, and become a threat to everything we know and love.

“From scratch”

By Darren Hiebert • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
…except for all of the 36 enzymes we borrowed from another living cell, yet still cannot do what that cell we borrowed it all from can do.

Oh great!

By jenningsthecat • Score: 3 Thread

Now AI, via robotics, will eventually be able to construct its own meat puppets with AI-directed brain development. Soon there will be no further need for the messy process of giving birth and raising kids to adulthood - just grow adults in a vat, program them, and put them to work.

I’m sure that Thiel, Karp, Musk, and the like are jacking themselves off while contemplating this news.

Ribosomes are awesome

By unfortunateson • Score: 3 Thread

Starting with a ribosome seems a bit like cheating — they’re extremely complex, probably Turing-complete biocomputers.

If there’s proof of a supreme being, or aliens seeding life here (is there a difference), it’s the ribosome.

Reddit Will Require You To Log In To Use Old Reddit

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica:
Reddit will start requiring people to be logged into Reddit to use old.reddit.com. The new requirement will take effect “over the next month,” a Reddit employee going by the username boat-botany announced on the social media platform today. The person claimed that the change is part of an ongoing effort to “tighten how automated systems access Reddit.”

The Reddit employee wrote: “Old Reddit’s logged-out experience is a significant source of abusive scraping and automated traffic on the platform. It’s also an important interface for many long-time mods and Redditors. To strike the right balance between preserving your access to Old Reddit while preventing abusive scraping and automated traffic, over the next month we will start requiring everyone to log in.”

In a follow-up comment, boat-botany defined abusive behavior as that which violates Reddit’s rule prohibiting activity that interferes with the platform’s “normal use” or that “create[s] programs or applications” that break Reddit’s (controversial) API rules. “By logging in, we get a lot more signal that allows us to detect whether an account is breaking the rules, and then we can block that traffic or enforce those accounts,” boat-botany said.
Asked why boat-botany scrapes New Reddit less frequently than Old Reddit, the Reddit employee pointed to another commenter’s explanation. "[T]he shape of malicious traffic is always changing,” the user, Nestramutat, wrote. “It’s going to be a constant cat and mouse game[.] As you ban one method, a new one gets developed. It’s easy to see abusive traffic in hindsight, but it’s harder to pre-emptively block it. Given that they’re claiming Old Reddit doesn’t have the modern security stack, this is likely proving to be an even greater challenge.”

Nestramutat said that the login requirement will add a barrier against threat actors. “You’re also now attaching an account ID to every malicious request, plus account creation is only available on New Reddit (with the enhanced security stack).”

As for how long Old Reddit will exist, boat-botany left the door open for its retirement. “We can’t promise it will be around forever, but [Reddit CEO Steve Huffman] himself has said we’ll keep supporting it while folks are still using it,” boat-botany wrote. “That said, it doesn’t have the same modern security tech stack reddit.com has, so we need to tighten security on old reddit to keep it viable.”

Maybe you’re the issue? + complaining about porn??

By Somervillain • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Hive mind / echo chamber hell is all Reddit is these days.

I haven’t had that experience at all, but I don’t do political or racist rants. Reddit is a treasure trove of information for my various hobbies and I learned a lot of extremely specialized knowledge for very specialized interests....plus free porn! I just feel bad for you…a website let’s you follow your interests to an intensely specialized and niche degree…AND offers unlimited free boobies and you get upset about their politics? You must be one miserable prick!

As they say “If you run into an asshole in the morning, you ran into an asshole. If you run into assholes all day, you’re the asshole.”

Re:Maybe you’re the issue? + complaining about por

By Cyrano de Maniac • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

I must 100% agree with this. I’ve never subscribed to any of various politics, religion, pop culture, or other such subs that are sure to be a cesspool. But I’ve found great value in homeowner, personal finance, robot lawn mower, retirement (crossing my fingers), tech, hobby, and other special interest subs. The only ones that get crappy with any regularity are the local state/city ones, as political bowels inevitably dump their load there.

Risky Business

By bill_mcgonigle • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Reddit isn’t wrong about bots but odds are what they really want is your identity. That earns money.

The trouble is people in Saudi Arabia will use old. to read about liberation topics or people in the US will read about drug topics, or whatever the mala prohibita are that will land you in prison for things that are perfectly legal in other jurisdictions.

Even people with accounts who read other subs logged in.

“Just create a new anonymous account” is what people will say who don’t understand how identity correlation works. Sure there are ways that 0.0000001% of the population can manage securely, but that’s not how this will go down.

The UK just arrested an American attorney who was critical of UK politics and they have multiple people in prison for clicking ‘Like’. If you think they won’t arrest somebody for reading the wrong sub, give it a few months.

Also, don’t connect through Heathrow ever again.

Smells Like Bullshit

By SlashbotAgent • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

No anonymous reading of old.reddit. “Cuz bots.”

  But, they’ll still allow anonymous reading of new reddit?

Thai smells like bullshit.

there is one fix and you won’t do it

By drinkypoo • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The fix is to come up with a news reader with cryptographically managed identities (not verified, just consistent) and go back to USENET with it. This does everything valuable that social networking does, but without the malevolent overlord.

Sony PlayStation Will Stop Releasing Games On Discs In 2028

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Longtime Slashdot reader AmiMoJo shares a report from the BBC:
New PlayStation games will no longer be released on discs from January 2028, the gaming giant has announced. Sony said in a blog post new games would still be able to be bought in shops, but they would come with a digital code. It comes just days after Rockstar announced the hotly-anticipated Grand Theft Auto VI would similarly launch without a physical disc.

It marks a significant moment for the gaming industry, which has in recent years begun to rely more and more on digital distribution. Sony said the move came “as consumer preferences and the broader entertainment industry continue to shift away from physical discs to digital.” “This is a natural direction for Sony Interactive Entertainment to adapt to consumer trends as the general preference for digital media significantly outpaces physical discs,” it added. […] PlayStation said the move would have no impact on games which are already released, or would be released before January 2028.

Fool Me Once…

By Local ID10T • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Fool Me Once: Sony Rootkit 2005,

Fool Me Twice: Sony Linux Removal 2010,

Won’t be fooled again!

Will the AI-fueled SSD-crisis be over in 2028?

By Misagon • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

So, does Sony think that SSDs will be affordable again in 2028?

Read-only optical disc media still haven’t been hit by an AI-boom induced price hike RAM and NAND Flash has, AFAIK.

The end of actually owning games

By Artem S. Tashkinov • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

You now only own a license that can be revoked at any time.

And, of course, you won’t be able to play anything if your internet connection goes down.

PC gaming has never looked so attractive. That is if you buy your games on GOG.

Re:Fool Me Once…

By RitchCraft • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

It only took the rootkit incident to convince me that Sony needed to be pulled from my purchase list. I used to love Sony products until the leadership showed their true colors. Treating your customers as the enemy is no way to do business.

Irrevocable license per 17 USC 117

By tepples • Score: 4, Informative Thread

The copyright statute of Slashdot’s home country defines a “copy” as a physical object in which a work is embodied, such as a book, ROM cartridge, or optical disc. The statutory license associated with ownership of a copy of a computer program includes making intermediate copies “as an essential step” in the use of the program. Title 17, United States Code, section 117. Historically, console makers and game publishers have lacked power to revoke this license with respect to a particular copy of a game that isn’t online-only. With the end of video game distribution on optical disc, this license becomes revocable, and that’s the problem.

Meta Loses Bid To Dismiss US States’ Claims That Facebook, Instagram Addict Children

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
A federal judge rejected Meta’s bid to dismiss claims from 29 state attorneys general alleging that Facebook and Instagram were designed to addict children while concealing the harms. The judge found significant factual disputes that must be decided at trial. They also ruled that Meta failed to comply with federal parental notice and consent requirements for children under 13, “and granted summary judgement to the states on that issue,” reports Reuters. From the report:
In a separate statement, California Attorney General Rob Bonta called the decision a “critical win” in holding Meta accountable for fueling a mental health crisis among American children. Gonzalez Rogers also oversees related multidistrict litigation by more than 2,600 individuals, school districts and local governments over whether social media platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, Google and YouTube, Snapchat and TikTok addict children.

The states said research has shown that children’s use of Facebook and Instagram could lead to depression, anxiety, insomnia, interference with education and daily life, and self-harm including suicide. Meta countered that the attorneys general had no evidence it misled consumers about its platforms’ alleged addictiveness, including in congressional testimony by Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg. The Menlo Park, California-based company said this was because “social media addiction” is not an established psychiatric condition, and therefore statements that its platforms are not addictive could not be false. Meta also said it didn’t violate the children’s online privacy law because it directed Facebook and Instagram to a general audience, not just children under age 13.

In a 38-page decision, Gonzalez Rogers found material factual disputes over whether Meta’s social media platforms are addictive, whether Meta falsely denied it designed them that way, and whether it “partially” directed the platforms at children. “The AGs present a reasonable interpretation of [Meta’s] statements that Facebook and Instagram are not designed in ways that cause teens to compulsively use the platforms to their detriment,” the judge wrote. “To the extent plaintiffs’ evidence shows that the platforms are in fact designed to do just that, a jury could reasonably find the statements were untrue to a reasonable person,” she added. A trial over California, Colorado, Kentucky and New Jersey’s claims against Meta is scheduled for August 18, court records show.
Further reading: Will Social Media Change After YouTube and Meta’s Court Defeat?

“Children”, they say

By joaommp • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

It’s not just children. It’s every age demographic. Maybe children might be more susceptible, but every single age group is a target.

Re:“Children”, they say

By Local ID10T • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Yes. That is part of their defense:

Meta also said it didn’t violate the children’s online privacy law because it directed Facebook and Instagram to a general audience, not just children under age 13.

“We harm everyone, not just kids!”

NASA Wants To Send Spare Nuclear-Powered Mars Rover To the Moon

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Space.com:
NASA provided an Artemis update today (June 30), announcing new lunar landing contracts for its Moon Base initiative and a surprise new possible rover mission that could be headed to the moon’s south pole. During the second monthly update that NASA has provided for its moon base plans, the agency named Astrobotic, Firefly Aerospace and Intuitive Machines as the providers of four robotic landers that will deliver scientific payloads to the surface of the moon, as NASA tests and expands the technologies needed for a permanent human outpost. “This is this drawing on the playbook that worked very well for NASA during the 1960s,” NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman said during the livestreamed update, explaining the experiential approach to a crewed lunar return. “We didn’t just jump right to Apollo 11.”

Isaacman also announced the potential repurposing of an engineering development model built to mirror the agency’s Perseverance and Curiosity rovers on Mars. “There is another,” Isaacman said, quoting Yoda’s line from “Star Wars: The Empire Strikes Back.” That test rover is called PROMISE, short for “Polar Rover for Observation, Mapping, and In-Situ Exploration” (though it was formerly known as Optimism). PROMISE was developed at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) in Southern California, where it has been used as a test platform for fixes or commands that engineers want to try on the ground before permanently sending them to Perseverance and Curiosity. Now, NASA wants to send PROMISE on a mission of its own. Though sending PROMISE to the moon would leave Perseverance and Curiosity — both of which remain active on Mars — without an Earth-based testbed, Isaacman thinks it would be worth it. “We’ve had years now of experience operating the two rovers on the surface of Mars, and we’ve got this hardware that the taxpayers have invested a lot in,” he said. “So the question was posed: ‘What if we send it to the moon?’"

With a little refurbishment, PROMISE would help advance NASA’s lunar plans, Isaacman added. Like Perseverance and Curiosity, the test rover is powered by a radioisotope thermoelectric generator (RTG), which converts heat from naturally decaying radioactive material into electricity. So it wouldn’t require sunlight to operate — a real benefit on the moon, where most locations experience long stretches of darkness. (NASA plans to build its Artemis base near the moon’s south pole, which is thought to harbor an abundance of water ice and also has a relatively complex lighting environment.) The other robots currently in the works to launch on future missions to the moon, including the landers announced during today’s update, are all solar powered. Through 2029, NASA hopes to launch up to 20 such missions as part of the CLPS (Commercial Lunar Payload Services) initiative to support the first phase of the agency’s moon base plans, and the landers announced today will be some of the first in that lineup.

Isaacman is not immune to the disease

By jacks smirking reven • Score: 3 Thread

Of having to make stupid choices to appease one man’s ego.

In a lot of ways I don’t mind Isaacman so far at NASA, he seems to have a passion and he understands the issues NASA faces but thiis shows he is not an independent head of the agency because everything about this proposal is kindof silly and I can only imagine it comes from a need to “get something on the moon” in the next 2 years. I doubt JPL wants this, I mean, who would ditch their test platform while both units are active on Mars?

Odd choice

By Baron_Yam • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

It’s designed for the wrong atmosphere, wrong g, wrong instrumentation, probably the wrong nav system.

Oh, and it is the reference model for some currently deployed devices that can’t be physically accessed for diagnostics.

It has the nice attribute of already existing, I’ll give it that.

The Vera Rubin Telescope Begins Surveying Our Cosmos

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
The Vera C. Rubin Observatory has begun its 10-year Legacy Survey of Space and Time, using the world’s largest digital camera to image the entire southern sky every few nights. The project is expected to catalog billions of stars and galaxies, track changing and transient objects, and generate an enormous dataset for studying dark matter, galaxy formation, asteroids, and unexpected cosmic phenomena. The New York Times reports:
“This is the end of a 30-year wait,” said Phil Marshall, the deputy director of the telescope’s operations at SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory in California, in a statement to The New York Times. “It’s a major milestone for us.” Astronomers expect this collection of data, known as the Legacy Survey of Space and Time, to revolutionize their knowledge of our galaxy’s birth, the invisible matter permeating the cosmos, what shaped the universe into the structure it has today and more. According to Dr. Marshall, the survey is designed to see everything, “even the things we don’t know we’re looking for yet,” he said.

The team behind the observatory, a joint effort funded by the U.S. Department of Energy and the National Science Foundation, unveiled several images of the cosmos that were jampacked with celestial goodness — a peek at what the Rubin could do — last year. Since then, scientists have been busy conducting final tests and reviews of the telescope’s operations and systems. According to Bob Blum, the director of Rubin operations at the National Optical-Infrared Astronomy Research Laboratory, the team has also been hard at work ensuring that the telescope can operate reliably in different environmental conditions for the next decade.

Keep it quiet

By necro81 • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
Please keep it quiet, otherwise the anti-DEI police of the current Administration will force it to close down, and probably douse it in acid, just for the crime of being named for a (qualified, historic, accomplished) woman.

Or, they’ll go after it for the same reason they went after the ocean monitoring system: they don’t want people asking questions the Administration doesn’t want the answers to. Don’t Look Up was supposed to be a parable, not an instruction manual.

How will its images compare to Hubble?

By schwit1 • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Wider field of view, vastly more data (time-lapse survey of entire sky every few nights), but lower angular resolution than Hubble’s sharp, targeted deep-space images.

How does it compare to other ground based telescopes?
Largest wide-field survey telescope (8.4m mirror, 3.2 gigapixel camera). Faster and broader than most ground-based (e.g., Subaru, VISTA), but lower resolution than adaptive-optics giants like Keck or ELT.

Re:Keep it quiet

By Waffle Iron • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

anti-DEI police of the current Administration

That DEI enforcement group seems to be asleep on the job. The current administration has appointed numerous women* to important positions.

*Biological women, that is. Sorry about the rest of you guys. I guess you are going to have to do a better job tucking.

Are you sure about that “biological” thing? Most of them look like Stepford Wives.

Re:Keep it quiet

By ArchieBunker • Score: 4, Funny Thread

Ah there it is. We can’t go a day without conservatives thinking about what genitals a person has.

Impressive telescope

By brebisson • Score: 3, Informative Thread

Hello,

This telescope is a monster…

It is designed to have a very wide view as opposed to other telescopes like hubble or the other bround based Giants.

This means that it can take a full picture of the sky every 15 days or so. (but with lower precision).

It has the largest “camera” in astronomy, made in fact of plenty of smaller cameras…

It has a trully amazing primary/tertiarry mirror, all in one.
This means that the main mirror, a 8m peice of glass has 2 parts, one with a given curvature (an “outside” ring) which acts as a primary mirror, while the second part, in the center acts as a tertiary mirror.

Most modern telescope use a 3 mirror configuration to correct for optical issues (Hubble only has 2).

Trully a marvel or engineering and a great thing for research! Yeha!
Cyrille

DOT Announces ‘Return of Supersonic Flight’ For Commercial Airlines

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
The FAA plans to replace its 1973 ban on civilian supersonic flight over U.S. land with a noise-based standard, potentially allowing aircraft to exceed Mach 1 as long as they stay below certain sound limits. The agency aims to finalize the rules by mid-2027, opening the door for companies such as Boom Supersonic and Spike Aerospace to operate quieter next-generation passenger jets over land. Longtime Slashdot reader schwit1 shared the notice (PDF) published Tuesday by the FAA. Forbes reports:
Technological advances “will eliminate the old sonic boom,” FAA Administrator Bryan Bedford said in a statement. “This means we can ultimately repeal the ban from the 1970s on supersonic flight over U.S. territory while minimizing noise impacts to residents in communities along the route and near airports.” The primary reason was public opposition to loud sonic booms. In the 1960s, a plane flying faster than the speed of sound — about 660 mph at high altitudes — created shock waves that traveled to the ground and reached human ears as a loud gunshot-like crack or thunder-like boom. Tests during that decade, including the Oklahoma City sonic boom experiments, found repeated booms broke windows, damaged property and generated thousands of public complaints.

In its 1973 ruling, the FAA stated that due to the limits of technology at that time, “a prohibition was needed to protect the public from sonic boom .... by preventing operations of a civil aircraft at a true flight Mach number greater than 1.” Several years later, Air France and British Airways introduced Concorde, and were allowed to serve New York’s John F. Kennedy International Airport as long as flights remained subsonic over U.S. land. Notably, “the prestigious London-New York service was the only truly profitable [Concorde] route, supported by high-powered business and celebrity travel,” wrote a former British Airways network planner for Forbes in 2021.

Several U.S. companies are working on a new generation of luxurious supersonic passenger aircraft with much quieter sonic booms and improved fuel efficiency. In particular, Colorado-headquartered Boom Supersonic says it has pre-orders from United Airlines, American Airlines and Japan Airlines for its Overture jets, which will carry 60-80 passengers. Atlanta-based Spike Aerospace is developing smaller Diplomat jets for up to 18 passengers. Both companies’ websites tout future transatlantic flights in under four hours.

More pandering to Epstein class billionaires

By cosmicl • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
who gotta have their faster louder planes to go with their faster louder AI data centers. More because we can, and screw you.

Re:US senators ae shiteaters who swallow

By Sique • Score: 5, Informative Thread
I wonder why most other nations also had a ban of non-military supersonic flight in place, nations with supersonic passenger jets, a.k.a. France and the United Kingdom, and those without, like Brasil or Germany.

Supersonic flight is incredibly noisy, and you don’t want it above you.

Concorde was LOUD!

By Malc • Score: 5, Informative Thread

It wasn’t just the sonic booms, this plane was just all around loud. It was a civilian plane afterburners! As somebody who lives about 500m directly under one of Heathrow’s landing flight paths, I’m happy it’s not coming over anymore.

I’ve always liked this video though. It starts off so quiet, suburban and banal, and then Corcorde roars over and shatters the scene, setting off a car alarm.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?…

Of course, there are lots of videos like this one too, also setting off car alarms:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?…

Re:Its not either or

By Ol Olsoc • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Back in the day Boeing and McDonnell Douglas were handed their arses by Concorde and didn’t like it so yes, part of the reason was US protectionism. Would the ban have happened anyway? Possibly, but the US aircraft industry certainly helped swing it.

google or DDG supersonic flight restrictions in the EU, then explain why the US is stupid for restrictions, yet the EU is being sensible.

For the rich…

By FrankSchwab • Score: 4, Informative Thread

So the rest of us are going to get to experience the joys of sonic thumps so that the 0.1% can get across the country an hour quicker?

You and I are never going to be able to afford a ticket on a “luxurious supersonic passenger aircraft” that seats 18 or 60-80 passengers. But we get to experience it. Whadda ya bet that the approved routes won’t go over Mar a Lago, Malibu, or Los Altos?

Trump Drops Restrictions On Anthropic’s Mythos and Fable Models

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
The Trump administration has lifted export restrictions that forced Anthropic to shut off public access to its Mythos and Fable models. After weeks of talks, Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick said Anthropic “has agreed to proactively detect and address security risks associated with the models; to work diligently with the U.S. government on protocols and standards and releases for Mythos, Fable and future models; and to inform the US government of any malicious activity.” Access is set to begin returning July 1. TechCrunch reports:
Anthropic had already publicly pledged to do much of this voluntarily, months before the export rule existed. That’s part of why cybersecurity experts were skeptical of the restrictions in the first place. To them, the ban looked less like a security fix and more like leverage, a way for the Trump administration to punish Anthropic for its executives’ public criticism of how the government, and the president’s political opponents, might use the technology.

Mythos was originally made available to a select group of organizations beginning in April to allay concerns about its ability to identify and exploit vulnerabilities in software, while a version called Fable was released to the public in June with additional security guardrails. However, with Asian AI companies beginning to release their own AI models approaching Mythos-level capabilities — among them Fugu and Tulonfeng — the US government was under pressure to ease its restrictions on Anthropic to ensure that American AI could compete globally.

Last week, Lutnick cleared Mythos to be released to select customers approved by the White House. OpenAI’s latest models were also released to a group of organizations approved by the Trump team, instead of the public. The Trump administration’s erratic approach to AI policymaking has left companies across the industry with little clarity about what will govern future model releases. An executive order issued in June that signaled a desire to review models ahead of release was criticized by influential analysts like Dean W. Ball, who recently started a policy position at OpenAI.

TACO Tuesday?

By evanh • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Yet another Trump back down.

Nice, but…

By meringuoid • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

… sadly for the Americans, the rest of the world now knows they can’t count on a US based provider for this kind of thing any more.

It was uncomfortable enough relying so heavily on American software back when it couldn’t be switched off remotely on the say so of an idiot. Today it’s an intolerable risk.

Re:Means nothing

By ArchieBunker • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Oh one thing is consistent. https://www.cbsnews.com/projec…

Anyone recall Jimmy Carter having to sell his peanut farm?

Re:TACO Tuesday?

By wed128 • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
Absolutely. The big AI companies have been creating models that are “Too dangerous to release to the public” since GPT2! https://www.theguardian.com/te…

Very clever marketing, but the story is getting old at this point. The models themselves aren’t dangerous, but the confidence that people put in them certainly is!

Re:TACO Tuesday?

By nightflameauto • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Yet another Trump back down.

This one’s pretty easy to understand from a sky-level view. He finally figured out how to make money off of Anthropic. Or their check cleared. Or both. There’s only one thing Donald Trump cares about: enrichment. His own or his family’s. Not yours. Not mine.

New Florida Law Bans Local Net-Zero Emissions Policies

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Inside Climate News:
A new state law limits Florida communities’ aims to offset greenhouse gas emissions that are warming the global climate and intensifying disasters such as hurricanes. Specifically, HB 1217 prohibits local governments from pursuing net-zero emissions goals. At least 10 cities and counties have implemented such policies, including Fort Lauderdale, Miami, Orlando and Leon County, where Tallahassee, the state capital, is located. But the new law will not necessarily upend these policies, said Bradley Marshall, senior attorney at Earthjustice, an advocacy group. “It’s certainly meant to scare municipalities and local governments from trying to do things to further net-zero policies,” he said. “Now, its exact impact and what it exactly prohibits is probably up for some debate. Things that are adjacent to it — emissions reductions and even climate change reduction policies — on their face will not run afoul at all of a ban on adopting a net zero policy.”

The measure requires local governments to submit an affidavit annually to the state Department of Revenue verifying compliance. Gov. Ron DeSantis, a Republican, signed the measure on April 22, Earth Day, and the law will take effect July 1. It states that “net zero policies, carbon taxes and assessments, and emission trading programs are detrimental to this state’s energy security and economic interests and inconsistent with the energy policy and the environmental policy of this state.” […] HB 1217 also prevents local governments from purchasing items such as vehicles or appliances based on the fuels they use or production of the items. Local governments may not participate in carbon-trading programs or use public funds to support other organizations with net-zero policies. Cities and counties also may not charge a tax or fee tied with carbon emissions.
“This bill is definitely part of a larger coordinated push by the political enablers of the fossil fuel industry to obstruct any tools — legal or legislative tools — to hold the industry accountable for its contributions to climate change,” said Laura Peterson, senior analyst at the Union for Concerned Scientists, an advocacy group. “Florida is really on the front lines. So I imagine the governor is taking this step because he sees what’s coming down the pike. It’s not getting better. So I can only assume that this is an effort to satisfy some of the pressures that he’s getting from donors and from his party to protect the industry. And he’s doing it at the expense of his constituents.”

Re:Global Warming is Hitting Florida Hard

By high_rolla • Score: 5, Funny Thread

They have a solution to this too. I’m sure in the near future they will introduce a new state law banning the sea from rising.
There will also be a subclause that should a local government break this law then they must rectify it exclusively through solutions that involve fossil fuels.
There you go, problem solved.

Loophole

By Meneth • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
There is a loophole in the text of the bill. Particularly section 1.2.e:

(e) “Net zero policy” means any policy, program, or initiative designed to achieve a balance between total amount of greenhouse gas emitted into the atmosphere with an equal amount removed from the atmosphere.

If a program targets an unequal amount, like [ removed = 1.5x emitted ], it would not be affected by this bill.

Re:Global Warming is Hitting Florida Hard

By gtall • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Ah, so if a state government cannot solve a global problem, they should just stick there with their thumbs up their ass and do nothing? Brilliant!!! Collectively solving any problem becomes impossible with that sort of reasoning. Do you work for la Presidenta? That’s his sort of “reasoning”.

Re:I’m OK with stupid

By thegarbz • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

People who think Trump is the stupidest possible don’t know about Ron DeSantis.

There’s a difference. Trump is stupid and his stupidity makes him dangerous. Ron DeSantis isn’t stupid, he’s actively dangerous, which sometimes comes across as stupid policies. Trump is incompetently destroying America. Ron DeSantis on the other hand knows exactly what he’s doing and how he’s going to do it.

Re:Yes. This is how you keep housing costs down

By snowshovelboy • Score: 5, Funny Thread

A slashdot comment advocating for windows. Now I’ve seen everything.