Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Ford’s Most Affordable EV Will Offer Built-In Bidirectional Home Charging
  2. Growing List of Firms Object to OKX-ICE Tokenized Stock Plans
  3. Code-Execution Flaw In UEFI Firmware Threatens Most Servers On Planet Earth
  4. Google’s Genie 4 World Model Adds Audio, More Realistic Worlds
  5. Anduril Partners With Qualcomm to Build Laptops On US Soil
  6. Apple’s Foldable iPhone Duo Draws Early Complaints of the Screen Cracking
  7. Cybersecurity CEO Indicted For Allegedly Scamming Millions From Ransomware Victims
  8. Apple Updates MacBook Pro With M6 Chips
  9. In China, the AI Bubble Has Already Burst
  10. Denmark Gives Up On Replacing Microsoft Office With Collabora
  11. Industry Executives Knew For Decades That Microplastics Were Infiltrating the Human Body
  12. US Designates Helium As a Critical Material
  13. PHP2Shell Security Flaws Now Successfully Exploited
  14. Skydance Offers Buyouts, Gives 5-Day RTO Order
  15. Firefox Tries to Bring Back the Internet’s ‘Good Old Days’

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Ford’s Most Affordable EV Will Offer Built-In Bidirectional Home Charging

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Ford’s upcoming $28,350 Fathom electric truck will include a built-in inverter capable of supplying up to 10 kW of AC power to a home, bringing bidirectional charging to a significantly cheaper EV. Owners will still need additional Ford home hardware for features like outage backup and peak-rate energy management, but the company expects the necessary equipment to cost substantially less than its previous-generation system. CNET reports:
The upcoming Fathom will be based on what Ford calls its Universal EV Platform, designed with the aid of its 2023 acquisition, startup Auto Motive Power, with bidirectional power on the plate from the start. The hardware required to invert the battery’s DC energy to an estimated 10 kW of AC home power will be built into the truck, so it won’t require a separate wall-mounted inverter box. Ford says the Fathom’s system will meet all applicable UL 1741 requirements and IEEE 1547 standards to ensure the vehicle is safely connected to the grid. As for the actual hardware you plug into your car, all signs point to the Fathom using the NACS plug type pioneered by Tesla and now widely adopted by new EVs in North America. In terms of the communication standard — the one that governs how AC power is routed from the slim wall box to the car’s onboard charger — that’ll be via SAE J3068, a software protocol developed for high-power, heavy-duty AC charging.

[…] However, while Fathom’s Universal EV Platform eliminates the need for a wall inverter box, it doesn’t completely bypass the need for additional hardware to make your home ready to accept bidirectional power. Say you wanted to take advantage of the Home Power Management feature to draw energy into the Fathom’s battery when power is cheapest, and then use that energy to offset peak-hour usage when power is most expensive. You’ll have to install at least the Ford Home Power Station in your home, at an additional cost. The automaker hasn’t specified pricing, but says that it’s working to reduce costs and expects this component alone to cost half as much as the first-generation Ford Home Energy system, which debuted at around $1,300. That could put the new system at roughly $650.

Great feature

By stabiesoft • • Score: 3 • Thread
I’d like that to be standard on EV’s.

Re:Great feature

By thegarbz • • Score: 4, Informative • Thread

It’s standard on current gen VW ID models, it’s standard on all BYD models, for some reason Renault only offers V2G and no suitable V2H feature, Audi’s most popular EV supports it (Q4 e-tron), Kia has it on the EV9 with plans for the EV6 to do it too, Hyundai IONIQ 9 has V2H but the 5 and 6 only offer V2L which is better than nothing. Among these there’s a mix of different hardware potentially required in the house, but most of that hardware is dumb with the car inverter doing the heavy lifting.

We’re slowly getting to the point where V2H is more common than not. It’s just really not heavily advertised.

What’s the installed price?

By CustomBuild • • Score: 3 • Thread

Getting a second useful job out of the most expensive part of an EV makes sense. If I’m already buying the truck, a reasonably priced way to keep the fridge and lights running is a pretty appealing extra, but the roughly $650 figure needs some context. Ford says outage backup also requires its Home Backup Power Panel. Then there’s installation. Moving the inverter into the truck is a useful saving, but I’d want the complete installed quote before comparing this with other backup options. There’s another detail in Ford’s announcement: peak-rate energy management requires an active plan or trial. What’s that going to cost? A recurring fee belongs in the calculation alongside conversion losses and additional battery cycling. Making the hardware affordable is a good start; the electricity savings still have to survive the subscription bill.

Tesla’s experiments

By Alascom • • Score: 3 • Thread

Tesla experimented with this and discovered many people would charge up at work, then use the power at home in the evening leaving just enough charge to get back to work in the morning to recharge. A great life-hack to cut your utility bill, but the downside was the battery cycling dramatically reduced the life of the cells. If used properly, such as only during power outages or emergencies it is a very handy solution. When used daily, it will cost more for early replacement of the battery than the owner will save in utility bills.

Growing List of Firms Object to OKX-ICE Tokenized Stock Plans

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Intel, Oracle, IBM and IonQ have joined a growing list of companies objecting to having tokenized versions of their shares traded through OKX and Intercontinental Exchange’s blockchain venture, bringing the total number of objections to 26. About 37% of the companies on OKXICE’s original list have now opted out, according to CoinDesk. From the report:
The four companies were named in an updated public notice (PDF) dated Monday, Oct. 26, from OKXICE, the two firms’ joint venture. They join earlier objectors including Microsoft, Alphabet, Goldman Sachs, Cisco and Wells Fargo. The growing list underscores a hurdle for OKXICE and the SEC’s new framework for tokenized stock trading: building a market that issuers are willing to join. The agency’s five-year “Innovation Exemption” gives qualifying venues room to test round-the-clock blockchain-based trading of stocks, and it also gives public companies an option to block their shares from being offered.

OKXICE issued its initial public notice on Oct. 4, outlining plans to use Uniswap v4 liquidity pools on OKX’s XLayer blockchain, with transactions settled in stablecoins. The venue would use automated market makers — software that executes trades through pools of assets rather than matching buyers and sellers through a conventional order book. Under the framework, venues must notify issuers and give them 30 days to object before offering tokenized versions of their shares.

This is not about crypto

By pla • • Score: 3 • Thread
I can already, completely above-board, sell someone a block of DRS’d IBM shares for crypto if I want to. Let’s all be clear this isn’t about denominating stocks in Bitcoin.

Rather, this is effectively about recording stock transactions on a blockchain. Nothing more and nothing less than swapping a distributed transaction log for a traditional ledger.

The implication is clear, the SEC is at least considering the idea of creating shares as a token cryptocurrency. In this case, the tokens are backed by real shares. That’s not a technical requirement, though, and a future company might someday skip the major exchanges entirely to list only as a token. To be clear, there’s nothing sacred about the exchanges and their “house rules”; there’s nothing inherently wrong with using a blockchain vs a ledger; and to reiterate, this has nothing to do with “buying stocks with Bitcoin”.

On that last point, I consider OKXICE’s decision to accept payment in some nondescript “stablecoins” as extremely unfortunate. Not because I’m a cryptophobe, but because it muddies the waters as to the viability of the core concept of tokenized equity itself - Though that’s a bit of a tautology, given stocks are already “tokenized equity”. Whether we denominate them in USD or BTC or cowrie shells is an entirely separate issue.

Code-Execution Flaw In UEFI Firmware Threatens Most Servers On Planet Earth

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Ars Technica’s Dan Goodin reports:
Defenders across the world face the burden of responding to yet another botched code-execution vulnerability, this time in boot-time firmware used by most of the world’s server vendors and data centers. The vulnerability, with a severity rating of 9.5 out of 10, resides in the TianoCore EDK II, an open source codebase that hardware makers and cloud providers use to create the UEFI firmware that runs during the boot-up sequence. Last year, a representative of the UEFI Forum called (PDF) EDK2 the “preeminent solution / implementation of the UEFI specifications.” Virtually all UEFI suppliers (sometimes still called IBVs or independent BIOS vendors), including AMI, Insyde, and Phoenix, use the reference code extensively. Project Mu, Microsoft’s hardened EDK2 fork, used the code containing the vulnerable component as well.

The vulnerability, tracked as CVE-2026-97631, is a memory-corruption flaw in an ICMP component that attackers can exploit to execute malicious code that runs before the operating system and firmware can implement defenses like Secure Boot, which establishes a chain of trust for all code, including the Trusted Platform Module (TPM), loaded during boot. While final payloads delivered by CVE-2026-97631 have no persistence — meaning they run only once — they can give attackers a wide opening to install other payloads that also run each time early in the boot process.

The parties that discovered CVE-2026-97631 — Alex Matrosov of Anthropic and Dan Holmes of Google — had arranged for it to stay under wraps until a coordinated disclosure that was scheduled for January. AMI, a maker of motherboards and other hardware, published this pull request last month that detailed the vulnerability and included a code fix. Once the post came to the attention of the discovering parties, TianoCore Project members published a public advisory last week. With publicly available patch code, it will be trivial for advanced hackers to learn how the vulnerability is triggered and to build working exploits. Further compounding the urgency, patching UEFI code vulnerabilities in millions of end devices sold and used by thousands of hardware makers and cloud providers is cumbersome and time-consuming.

“On Planet Earth”

By Petersko • • Score: 4, Informative • Thread

My apologies for the pedantic reply, but I’m just getting exhausted by the seemingly endless need people have to inject urgency into headlines. “On Planet Earth” is not necessary. At all. You can drop those words and the sentence means exactly the same thing.

What would be useful in the summary is some information on how the attack might happen.

For the record, during the window of a PXE-boot, a malicious unicast ICMP error message can be picked up by the driver and cause a buffer overrun. The window is closed when boot is complete.

https://github.com/tianocore/e…

To be clear…

By greytree • • Score: 3, Interesting • Thread
To be clear about this ( because it wasn’t to me ):

Attackers can exploit this and fuck up your computer’s UEFI *from within* Windows.

Because you usually need to update your MB code from the UEFI interface, you might think that is necessary to access UEFI code.
It is not.

Re: “On Planet Earth”

By 93 Escort Wagon • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

Must I remind you about the Slashdot Code of Conduct?

- Reading anything except the summary is against the rules and may result in a lifetime ban.

- Reading the full summary is frowned upon, but allowable. However posters are strongly encouraged to stop reading after the first two sentences.

- Responses which make it obvious the author only read the first half of the submission title should be modded “Insightful” if at all possible.

Google’s Genie 4 World Model Adds Audio, More Realistic Worlds

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from TechCrunch:
Google DeepMind released its newest world model, Genie 4, in research preview on Tuesday. The latest model generates the most photorealistic and interactive worlds yet, allowing users to type prompts mid-simulation to change the scene. The model also generates real-time audio that matches the simulated world, including music, ambient noises, and interactive dialogue.

[…] Google released its predecessor, Genie 3, as a research preview a little over a year ago. Aside from being far more photorealistic and featuring audio, Genie 4 allows for freeform edits, like changing the weather or camera angle in real time or adding new people or objects. It can maintain a consistent scene for up to two minutes, double its predecessor’s limit, and offers better physics and more human-like characters. Gemini, Google’s AI model, is also mo
“What we’ll increasingly see in the future are these hybrid world models, where you have a combination of Gemini writing code and text, and Genie ingesting that in real time and simulating reality at different levels of abstraction,” Tejas Kulkarni, research director at Google, said during a briefing.
Genie 4 is now available to select testers, with a broader rollout planned in the coming weeks for Google AI Ultra subscribers.

You can watch a demo of Genie 4 on YouTube.

Anduril Partners With Qualcomm to Build Laptops On US Soil

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Longtime Slashdot reader fadethepolice writes:
Anduril, arguing that its manufacturing capabilities are directly applicable to laptop manufacturing, is starting a project for a fully 100% U.S.-sourced laptop. The computer will use a Qualcomm Snapdragon SoC. I did not see any information about the OS, but I’m assuming that, given the type of processor, this will be Linux-based?
“Other companies might design their computers in the U.S., Anduril makes them here,â the Anduril founder Palmer Luckey said in a YouTube video. “We’re making parts out of metals that the U.S. knows how to extract, knows how to refine, knows how to process, and knows how to mill at scale at a reasonable price; and that goes for the entire laptop. The same thing goes for the battery technology.”

The project, called BlueChip, “will take a phased approach, beginning with expanding domestic sourcing and manufacturing, progressing toward eliminating reliance on foreign suppliers, and ultimately establishing an end-to-end American supply chain.” The first device is expected in April 2027.

A press release with additional information is available here.

Oh boy.

By fuzzyfuzzyfungus • • Score: 3, Insightful • Thread
This seems like a great pick if you want to be absolutely sure that your computing stays between you, the techbros, republican loyalists in ‘national security’; and possibly an Israeli software partner or two.

At least no chicom lithium stealing your thoughts.

Re:Not What You Hoped For

By ArchieBunker • • Score: 4, Informative • Thread

Palmer Luckey has gifted dear leader and was rewarded. https://www.theguardian.com/us…

Apple’s Foldable iPhone Duo Draws Early Complaints of the Screen Cracking

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Apple has acknowledged an inner-display defect affecting a small number of its new $1,999 iPhone Duo foldables after customers reported hearing a crunch while unfolding the device before cracks, lines and other display failures appeared along the crease. Apple is replacing affected phones and investigating the problem.

iFixit believes a failing hinge component may be pressing into and cracking the display rather than the panel itself being defective. Bloomberg reports:
Reports of the problem first surfaced on Reddit and other social media sites. Bloomberg News has since independently verified the issue with more than half a dozen customers, who provided photos showing damage to their devices or evidence of their support conversations with Apple. Apple acknowledged the issue in a statement, saying it was “aware of an issue impacting the inner display on a small number of iPhone Duo units.”

“If users experience issues with their iPhone Duo display, they should contact AppleCare for a replacement,” the Cupertino, California-based company said. Most Duos aren’t affected by the problem, and the units that are impacted exhibit the defect quickly, Apple said.

An initial crunch…

By TWX • • Score: 3 • Thread

…is normally preferred with a good, crisp apple.

Skeptical that this always presents itself quickly

By LodCrappo • • Score: 3 • Thread

“Most Duos aren’t affected by the problem, and the units that are impacted exhibit the defect quickly, Apple said.”

I’m skeptical of this. This video shows the exact same damage occurring after 75,001 opens - https://gizmodo.com/iphone-duo…

Cybersecurity CEO Indicted For Allegedly Scamming Millions From Ransomware Victims

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from ProPublica:
A Florida man who was the subject of a 2019 investigation by ProPublica was indicted last month on federal charges that he defrauded clients of his ransomware data recovery firm. According to the Justice Department, the man, Zohar Pinhasi, told customers he could recover their encrypted files without having to pay hackers, when, in reality, he paid the ransom and charged victims a hefty fee on top. The indictment mirrors the findings from ProPublica’s 2019 article "The Trade Secret,” which centered on Pinhasi and his scheme.

The outlet found that the ransomware victims were being harmed twice: once by the hackers, who locked their targets’ files and demanded ransom, and a second time by MonsterCloud, Pinhasi’s Florida-based data recovery firm, which misled its clients about not paying ransoms. “By falsely claiming to decrypt ransomware without paying off the ransomers, the defendant re-victimized his clients while extracting a hefty profit for himself,” U.S. Attorney Joseph Nocella said in an Oct. 7 press release. “Our Office will vigorously prosecute ransomware attackers who prey on Americans from across the world and those who cynically profit from their criminal activity.” […] Pinhasi, who went by the alias Zack Green, told ProPublica in 2019 that MonsterCloud never promised clients that their data will be recovered by any particular method. “How we do it, it’s our problem,” he told ProPublica. “You will get your data back. Sit back, relax and enjoy the ride.” He called MonsterCloud’s data recovery methods a “trade secret.”

[…] Federal investigators found that, over the course of the scheme, Pinhasi allegedly charged clients more than $19 million and paid more than $8 million in ransom payments. In one example, Pinhasi made a ransom payment of about $8,200 but charged the client about $150,000. If convicted, he faces up to 20 years in prison. […] In 2019, Pinhasi touted MonsterCloud’s ties to law enforcement as evidence of its integrity. Pistole, who also headed the Transportation Security Administration under President Barack Obama, was listed on MonsterCloud’s website as the only member of its “Cyber Security Advisory Council.”

Re: Unethical but was it illegal?

By drinkypoo • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

It’s not illegal unless you tell him you’re going to get him the best price and then knowingly don’t. That’s fraud.

Re: Unethical but was it illegal?

By Reckoning • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
This isn’t a legal transaction. That’s like saying you’re just marking up trafficked children. It’s not just “market markup”, YOU ARE PARTICIPATING IN A CRIME.

Re: Unethical but was it illegal?

By TuballoyThunder • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread
Well fraudulent misrepresentation comes to mind, which could trigger wire fraud (18 U.S.C. Â 1343). Also, aiding and abetting (18 U.S.C. Â 2) is in play. Conspiracy if they are collaborating with the ransomware gang, which could bring in 18 U.S.C. Â 1030.

Wire Fraud

By SlashbotAgent • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

For those unable to chase links; he’s been charged with Wire Fraud.

https://www.justice.gov/usao-e…

Re:Success rate?

By aardvarkjoe • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

The thing about ransomware is that if paying the ransom does not actually result in decrypted files no one will ever pay a ransom again.

Many of your victims won’t be able to say anything even if the files aren’t decrypted — this case is a good example, since the company in question couldn’t admit publicly that they were paying ransoms.

A little searching shows that scams (beyond the base “pay to decrypt”) are very common. You’re dealing with criminals. If you pay a ransom, they now know that you have money that you’re willing to pay, and they’re going to do whatever they can to get more of it.

Apple Updates MacBook Pro With M6 Chips

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Ahead of the touchscreen MacBook Pro expected to debut tomorrow, Apple has refreshed its standard 14-inch MacBook Pro with the new M6 processor, promising up to 20% faster multithreaded performance, improved power efficiency, and more powerful on-device AI capabilities. The Verge reports:
Announced this morning through a press release, the new 14-inch MacBook Pro features three Thunder 4 USB-C ports that all support charging and DisplayPort connectivity, a MagSafe 3 charging port, full-size HDMI, and an SDXC memory card slot accommodating photographers. Pricing for the new M6 version of the 14-inch MacBook Pro starts at $1,999 with 16GB of memory, the same as last year’s M5 model. Preorders start on October 28th and shipping is expected to begin on November 6th.

The new M6 processor is Apple’s first 2nm chip with a bump to a 12-core CPU, up from 10 cores in the M5, and the company says it offers up to 1.2x faster multithreaded performance when compared to its predecessor. The M6 also features a Dual 16-core Neural Engine to handle heavy on-device AI tasks, plus an upgraded 12-core GPU with a Neural Accelerator in each core. In addition to performance improvements, Apple says its M6 processor is more power efficient.

Math

By Luthair • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread
There are 12 cores over the previous 10, so that is 20% or 1.2x the multithreaded performance. Does that mean they expect zero overhead, or the performance improvement of m5 to m6 is no different than the overhead.

In China, the AI Bubble Has Already Burst

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Reuters:
While global tech stocks teeter, in China they have already crashed as lofty valuations collapse under worries about AI demand and curbs on Chinese exports. The meltdown, tanking the mainland STAR50 index of AI and semiconductor leaders by 40% in less than four months and vaporizing some $480 billion in market value, is an ill omen for wobbly world markets and a dampener on China’s efforts at encouraging its savers into stocks to fund the AI boom. It has also slammed the brakes on a rally running two years, since economic stimulus promises sent shares soaring, and has stalled Beijing’s push to break with a long boom-bust pattern and drive a “slow bull” market that delivers reliable performance. China’s broad blue-chip index has dropped about 20% from highs made in June. “The stock market later evolved into a speculative crazy bull,” said Beijing-based fund manager Dong Baozhen. “And now we see the bubble bursting.”
There was no clear trigger for the selloff in China, though traders pointed to high valuations, tax bills, and the threat of foreign bans on Chinese data center equipment. According to Goldman Sachs, AI stocks account for 42% of China’s market capitalization and 57% of trading turnover, leaving investors widely exposed to the downturn.
“What’s happening is now going to put a stop for many of the companies trying to get themselves listed,” said Hong Hao, managing partner and chief investment officer at Lotus Asset Management in Hong Kong.

“Overemphasising the ‘technology content’ — that is, the weighting of tech companies by market value in major indexes — leads to a deviation, even a distortion, in capital behavior,” said Leo Wang, partner at Beijing-based Qianchuang Capital. “This created a severe bubble in certain sectors and a serious drain on others.”

“Just like all other Chinese manufacturers, (chipmakers and AI suppliers) will eventually end up in a price war,” said fund manager Wang Zhuo, partner at Shanghai Zhuozhu Investment Management. “There’s no exception,” he said. “All bubbles inevitably burst.”

Re:It’s a trade-off

By Junta • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

The 401k will just become 401.

Let’s keep some perspective

By Whateverthisis • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
No one, not even people in China, trust the Chinese stock markets. The companies aren’t required to be as transparent, and most of their financing is more likely to come from a State-Owned bank and debt, not the stock market. Because of that, this market tends to be a bit more like a casino than how we in the Western world might view the NYSE or the NASDAQ or the London Stock Exchange. That also means that it’s highly prone to overspeculation. As someone posted above, the NASDAQ on average is priced at around 30X earnings; by comparison the STAR50 index was trading at 250X the average earnings of its’ companies. Many of the companies were domestic hardware suppliers, but as more and more barriers are starting to rise against Chinese hardware going into AI Infrastructure, investors spooked, got out and the index fell.

For perspective:

The Shanghai Composite Index dropped 72.8% during the 2007-2008 global financial crisis. For comparison US stock markets fell around 53%, and began recovering quickly.

The Shanghai Composite again crashed 49% in 2016, when State media was encouraing people to invest in their stock market to try and grow it to become competitive to Western stock markets. Novice retail investors jumped in, and through that encouragement heavily invested with margin loans. That spooked the government, who started putting regulations on those loans; everyone panicked and the market crashed within a few weeks as everyone tried to get out to cover their margin loans.

Afterwards, the government put in these circuit breaker regulations, to stop trading if the market dropped more than a certain percentage to mitigate those steep drops, again in 2016. The first day those regulations went into place, everyone panicked, triggered a big sell off, and trading halted within minutes. Investors saw the market freeze, panicked even more, and the next day everyone rushed to get their money out, erasing roughly US $1 trillion in value and forcing Beijing to remove the circuit breaker regulations.

This market is very prone to hype, panic attacks, reactionary regulations, over confidence and underperforming. So you have to take these kinds of stories from this market with a bit of skepticism; this just appears to be a feature of the Chinese stock markets.

Not great news for Anthropic

By ddtmm • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread
It will be interesting to see how this affects Anthropic’s IPO in a few weeks. With this much instability I’d definitely be waiting before investing in it at this point.

Re:It’s a trade-off

By stealth_finger • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread
Mine is 404

Chinese AI has moved to being cheap to run

By BrightCandle • • Score: 4, Informative • Thread
The Chinese AI companies have been starved of resources in a way the western companies haven’t and so they have in a lot of cases produced models that are more efficient and better designed instead of brute forcing their way bigger model to make them better. Companies like Deepseek have a model that is pretty close to the western models but its about 1/100th the price to run. Z.AI with its GLM model has quite a small model which is also very efficient to run and is also competing in the top models. Qwen is not there yet but its next AI will also use the same techniques to reduce running costs. These companies already drastically undercut the American companies and they provide their weights open so that other hosts can run it and in some cases they can be run at home. Their cloud services are much cheaper than Anthropic and OpenAI anyway. The price wars have begun.

Denmark Gives Up On Replacing Microsoft Office With Collabora

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Denmark’s Ministry of Digitization reportedly abandoned a pilot to replace Microsoft Office with the open-source Collabora suite less than six months after it began. Tom’s Hardware reports:
According to Danish publication Computerworld, the pilot project was launched in 2025 and involved 38 employees, all of whom would start using the British open-source Collabora office suite instead of Word, PowerPoint, and Excel. The experiment was initiated by the then Digitization Minister Caroline Stage, who wanted to reduce the country’s dependence on American technology. Denmark isn’t alone in moving away from U.S. software, with France and the Netherlands both taking steps to replace Microsoft Windows. However, it seemed that the experiment fizzled out less than six months after it started. It had reportedly ended by the time the Danish government called for an early election in February 2026, with some employees complaining about issues with style, paragraph formatting, blank pages, and challenges with tracking changes.

But even though it’s been months since the experiment reportedly ended, Prof. Mikkel Flyberbom of the Copenhagen Business School complains that the project hasn’t been properly evaluated. “It’s a good idea to test alternatives in a pilot project,” the professor said in an email. “However, I wish that the ministry would take the opportunity to learn from the pilot project and share those experiences with other parts of the public sector.”

Compatibility is always going to be a problem…

By robbak • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

..Because MS Office has been designed from the ground up to be challenging to be compatible with. It started with a file format that was in essence the internal memory state of the program written out to disk. When they went to XML, all they really did was record that internal memory state in XML

Anyone wanting to be compatible with Office ‘properly’ need to implement pretty much all of the office program to render the document, and then convert the resulting render to their format.

What we need to do is to somehow make this Microsoft’s problem. Make the cleanest open source office renderer the standard, define that rendering as the correct one, and if Word or Excel renders it differently, then that’s a bug in Word or Excel. Or even better, make ODF the standard, and judge Office on its rendering and creating ODF formats.

Re:Compatibility is always going to be a problem..

By Alain Williams • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

Or even better, make ODF the standard, and judge Office on its rendering and creating ODF formats.

Again being the size it is the government Denmark can start with publishing all of its forms in ODF format, no more DOCX; also use open/free fonts. This makes it a MS problems if they do not render properly — people will start blaming MS for errors not the other way round. Thus industry and people at home will start using LibreOffice (what is in Collabora).

Next they need to push schools & tech colleges to use ODF, too many of them train students to learn how to use Microsoft products, they graduate and expect to use MS in their jobs. Actually: it would be nice if schools were to train people properly, most teachers do not know how to use style sheets, etc, and, eg, will make columns line up by pressing spaces rather than setting tabs/whatever. Start by teaching teachers (harder than you think).

Re:It’s funny

By Ol Olsoc • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

More to the point, management would have to understand the alternatives, none of which are they familiar. MS-Crapware is ubiquitous on their desktops, hence they have developed a sense they understand it. Their accounting depts agree, they can put a precise value on the stuff, it isn’t out of the ordinary expensive, they happy. Plus, there are all those Excel spreadsheets with all their home-grown macros doing fuck-all, and it is worse if the fellows who wrote that crap have left the company; they are not around to explain how it works.

The inertia, the “tools I use” outlook brought up a memory. This all happened within a couple weeks. A guy on the non-technical, more marketing arena at work needed to make an instruction manual for the projects sponsor. So he used PowerPoint to attempt the manual instead of Word. It all fell apart on trying to index and other issues. Problem was, he used the entire budget for his mess. He brought it to my department and tried to get us to start all over without charging for it, which we couldn’t do. Had to get special permission and an emergency charge number from accounting. Then there was the young lady from accounting. Fresh graduate, she needed to put together a presentation. So of course, she used Excel. And likewise faceplanted. She was also a bit of a handful. Came in all afire, ready to bite my head off, eventually crying and hyperventilating. Fortunately I knew her reputation already. With a barrage of screenshotting and redoing the things Excel doesn’t do, I got her a reasonably nice PowerPoint, had her go over it. Even taught her some breathing exercises. She ended up doing okay on her big presentation, came back apologizing for yelling at me.

Re:Shocking

By greytree • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
To me it’s shocking that Collabora’s budget couldn’t persuade the very competent “Digitization Minister Caroline Stage” to drag this out for another couple of years.

I mean, she had all the skills and experience to evaluate their Digitization solution, what with her experience:
“She previously worked in government affairs at British American Tobacco from 2016 to 2023 and held board positions at The Danish Tobacco Manufacturers.[1] She was a member of the Copenhagen City Council from 2014 to 2020, representing Venstre.[2] She worked as special advisor to minister of foreign affairs Lars Løkke Rasmussen from July 2024 until her appointment as minister in August 2024.[3] She was elected as a member of the Folketing in March 2026.”

Re:Users hate software changes

By SlashbotAgent • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

While not liking change is true, it’s not the only thing at play here. As well as change aversion, these users will also continuously run up against problems with format issues, absence of features, and incredulous peers saying things like ‘what do you mean you don’t have Teams, encrypted email, AI integration, offline copies…

Microsoft Office is not just a desktop suite anymore. It is now an integrated component of a much larger and much more capable cloud service, M365. And before anyone responds with ‘you can make OSS do this or that’, think about and acknowledge the fact that after great difficulty implementing it, you will then have a system that 90% of the World doesn’t have access to or compatibility with. Even Google WorkSpace, matching M365 feature for feature, can’t seem to overcome the critical mass and network effect that M365 has established.

There’s far more to this than just hating change.

Industry Executives Knew For Decades That Microplastics Were Infiltrating the Human Body

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Susanne Rust of the Los Angeles Times reports (paywalled) that industry executives knew for decades that microplastics were infiltrating the human body. Slashdot reader joshuark shares an excerpt from the report:
Scientists today say we’re just beginning to understand the harm that the tiny bits of plastic we drink, eat and breathe are doing to the human body. Internal memos among company scientists and executives obtained by The Times reveal that for at least half a century, the plastics industry has been aware of and concerned about the potential for microplastic contamination in the human body. But recently discovered chemical company documents dating back several decades show that industry scientists have long been aware of — and concerned about — the way microplastic particles migrate beyond the gut in animals and humans, depositing in important organs. And the potential for that knowledge to affect the plastic food packaging industry.

Their concern goes back to 1974 and a scientific meeting at a New York City hotel, where a German gastroenterologist presented a scientific paper that showed for the first time that ingested particles like microplastics could infiltrate the rest of the body. His presentation was largely overlooked by the government scientists in attendance but became a point of worried discussion among company scientists. Tracey Woodruff, professor of epidemiology and population health at Stanford University, who reviewed the documents, said they indicate scientists and executives at major chemical companies have known and remained silent even as microplastics accumulated in tissues. She likened it to other industries that knew about pollutants — greenhouse gases, asbestos and tobacco — but did not take action to make them safer.

A spokesperson with the chemical industry’s largest trade group took issue with that characterization. “Scientific debate over what the evidence shows is not silence. It is how sound science and effective policy advance,” said Craig Davis, senior director of plastics chemistry at the American Chemistry Council. “Our industry is committed to advancing microplastics science by supporting independent research and policies that would do so.”

Re:Harm

By vivian • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

An yet, fertility rates are dropping world wide, cancer rates and obesity are increasing - all things you could expect to happen from something that can have a hormonal and endrocrine disrupting effects in the body - which microplastics most definitely have shown to have.

Re:Harm

By AmiMoJo • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

“Let’s wait until there is undeniable evidence that it is causing massive problems” didn’t work so well for climate change, did it?

Or smoking.

We should probably just view pollution as bad in general and try to limit it before it becomes a problem.

Re:Harm

By excelsior_gr • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread
Sorry mate, you and the GP are just out of your element. “Plastics” is a family of thousands of compounds. If you’re looking on a study on the health impact of “plastics” you will not find any. Such studies must focus on a single or small subcategory of components and generalizations do not hold. Also, a single type of plastic includes not only the polymer itself but also additives like pthalates (please *do* search on the health effects of those!), lead compounds (now mostly banned) and residual monomer molecules. These leach out or outgas especially when the items are new. They usually biodegrade, but you are constantly exposed if you keep buying a steady stream of plastic stuff.

Re:Harm

By Rei • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

The entire selling point of plastics is essentially that they are not very biologically active.

Gold, on macroscopic scales, is yellow, inert, melts at 1064C, and is a conductor.
Gold, on nanoscales, is wine-red, purple, blue, brown, or clear, is a catalyst, melts at ~400C, and behaves like a quantized semiconductor.

Scale matters greatly when it comes to material properties. And one thing to clear up here: while people commonly talk about “microplastics”, for clarity, some scientists divide it up between microplastics and nanoplastics. Microplastics (such as from abrasion, fine fibres, etc) are not harmless (inhalation is similar to other inhaled particle matter, for example - not great for your lungs), but they’re not the primary area of concern. Nanoplastics are where the concern is. These come from for example hot liquids in plastic containers close to their glass transition temperatures and the like.

When a nanoparticle enters a biological fluid, it becomes coated in proteins and lipds on its surface (a “protein corona”). The core particle becomes masked and begins to interact with cells and bypasses cellular defense mechanisms (nanoparticles are often used for drug delivery). Microplastics largely pass through the digestive tract uneffected, but nanoplastics cross straight through the intestinal epithelium, and even the blood-brain barrier and the placental barrier.

The evidence of harm is no longer “limited”; this is unfortunately not a factual statement, unfortunately. I would recommend reading for just one example Marfella et al., N Engl J Med. Cartoid plaques of patients were analyzed and studied for microplastics; there were significant accumulations in 58.4% of patients. This in itself is not meaningful, but the consequences were: the patients with microplastics had a massive 4,5x higher risk of heart attack, stroke, or all-cause death. And it appears directly causal: as previous research had suggested that nanoplastics are pro-inflammatory, they studied this, and found that the plastic-positive plaques had dramatically higher inflammatory biomarkers.

The inflammatory problem is what’s called “frustrated phagocytosis”. When macrophages encounter persistent non-biodegradable particles, they respond by engulfing them. But their enzymes cannot break down plastics. Like a gull that has consumed plastic-laden food in its diet and dies with a gut full of plastics, it will eventually kill them. Because enzymatic degradation fails, they churn out ever-increasing quantities of reactive oxygen species and pro-inflammatory cytokines (to call for help) until they end up destroying themselves - undergoing apoptosis and spilling these toxins into the surrounding tissue. It drives chronic sterile inflammation.

A good analogy is asbestos. The entire commercial selling point was that it was a miracle mineral: completely non-combustible, chemically inert, and basically indestructable. The problem is that those properties carry over into the human body as well: macrophages attempt to engulf and destroy asbestos particles, fail, and undergo an oncogenic inflammatory cascade.

Another example is fine particulate matter. Macroscale carbon is extremely inert. Grind it into PM2.5 particles and inhale that, however, and it’s horrible for your lungs, and causes systemic vascular inflammation. A chunk of quartz could not be less harmful to you. Grind it into nanoparticles, breathe enough in, and congrats, you have silicosis.

Also, you have to understand that plastics are not pure; they’re loaded with a whole zoo of additives in significant quantities (often even the catalysts used in their production - plastic catalysts are commonly lost in the process of producing their respective plastics). There’s colorants, plasticizers, flame retardants, UV stabilizers, and on and on and on, at percentages ranging from a couple percent into double digits. At macroscales, these remain embedded firmly within the polymers. At nanoscales, leaching is trivial; the nanoparticles effective become delivery vehicles for them into cells.

I focused just on one study above, but there are tons now. Parkinsons. Brain penetration and accumulation. Inflammatory bowel. 100% presence in testicular tissue, with higher levels associated with lower sperm counts. Presence in semen, and quantity associated with abnormalities and lower motility. Deep alveolar accumulation from airborne MPs, with foreign-body reactions similar to low-grade silicosis. Hepatotoxicity and DNA damage, with the latter triggering fibrosis via the cGAS/STING pathway. On and on.

Of course, none of these should be surprising, because once you establish that something is (1) pro-inflammatory, (2) breakdown-resistant, and (3) capable of easily penetrating everywhere in the body, you can expect impacts on pretty much every system. To be clear, ingesting pro-inflammatory particles does not mean “you die tomorrow”. But low-level chronic systemic inflammation is not good for your long-term health.

From a personal note, I get where you’re coming from. I commonly resist taking action that’s recommended if it doesn’t make sense to me, until I look into it. For an example, as a vegetarian, you’d commonly see things about how vegetarians and esp. vegans should take a marine EPA/DHA supplement (cold-saltwater algal oil, as equivalent to cold-saltwater fatty fish oil). How does that make sense? Humans evolved first as fructivores in the African jungles, then as scavengers on the savannah. Where we ate fish at all it was geographically-specific, freshwater, and warmwater. If EPA/DHA were important, we’d just upregulate our genes. There’s an entire subcontinent of vegetarians in south asia, and they seem perfectly healthy. Where’s the logic?

And then, eventually, I actually looked into the logic. Our scavenger ancestors also ate bone marrow and brains, which are rich in EPA and DHA. Low EPA and DHA impacts are minor during the reproductive years, they mainly effect you in your later life, so they’re not very evolutionarily selective. And actually there is upregulation of ALA to EPA (and to a small extent, DHA) conversion in south asian populations! So? Now I take algal oil.

Getting rid of most of your nanoplastic flux doesn’t require massive changes. The main thing is very simple: don’t have plastic or plastic-lined containers or teabags touching hot liquids / hot food. Cold is fine; it’s heat that leaches nanoplastic particles. Or if you are going to use plastic for hot liquids, use a plastic with significantly higher heat tolerance, as they shed dramatically fewer nanoplastics. Honestly, I think we shot ourselves in the foot with the polycarbonate phaseouts (over bisphenol-A concerns). The bisphenol-A threat picture seems far lower than the nanoplastic threat picture (human exposures are much weaker than dietary phytoestrogens, its estrogenic profile is matched or less concerning than a number of dietary phytoestrogens, and the evidence linking it to actual harm is pretty weak in most cases… possibly PCOS, but breast cancer does not seem to stand up. Dietary phyotestrogens have a great PR agent, while bisphenol-A has a lousy one). Polycarbonate is not immune from shedding nanoplastics in hot liquids, but it sheds orders of magnitude fewer than e.g. polyethylene, polypropylene, etc, so the precautionary phaseouts seem ill-advised.

Re:Harm

By Rei • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

Another one of those counterintuitive things (on the algal oil) line for me was creatine. Clearly more athletic power and performance is unambiguously evolutionarily advantagenous - if it were good and safe for us to have more, why wouldn’t we just produce more?

It turns out that the answer is: it’s massively costly to us to produce. We can’t just produce and attach methyl groups (part of the creatine synthesis pathway) out of thin air. Creatine alone consumes half of our transmethylation flux from SAMe -> SAH -> homocysteine! We have to utilize the essential amino acid methionine (which is low in most plant matter, which makes up the majority of most hunter-gatherer calories). And the process is actively harmful to us. The intermediary SAH inhibits almost all transmethylation enzymes. Homocysteine is toxic (endothelial damage, oxidative stress, protein misfolding, etc). Clearing homocysteine is expensive, SAMe does double duty with epigenetic regulation and as a metabolic sensor, etc. High methionine metabolism is directly linked to accelerated aging, and methionine restriction leads to significant increases in lifespan in animal models.

Since consumption of dietary creatine downregulates the production of innate creatine and thus its transmethylation requirements, it’s arguably outright healthy to consume more dietary creatine.

US Designates Helium As a Critical Material

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from the Associated Press:
The U.S. designated helium as a critical material on Friday because it’s indispensable for making semiconductors that are essential to energy generation, and the global supply is at risk of disruption, according to the Energy Department. The designation by the Energy Department means that more federal financing will be available for helium producers and that the government will monitor it more closely. Helium is primarily produced as a byproduct of natural gas processing. The United States is the world’s largest producer of natural gas and of helium. Qatar and Russia are the other top helium producers.

[…] Helium makes balloons rise, but that’s not why the DOE is interested in it. Helium plays an important role in wind, solar and nuclear energy production, space exploration, medical imaging and research. Assistant Secretary of Energy Audrey Robertson said helium’s unique properties make it irreplaceable, such as the fact that it’s non-combustible and has the lowest boiling point of any gas. The nation needs an ample supply for semiconductors, quantum and super computing, and superconducting magnets, added Robertson, who oversees the Office of Critical Minerals and Energy Innovation.

[…] Despite environmental concerns with recovering helium from natural gas, there are also opportunities, said Greeshma Gadikota, director of the Lenfast Center for Sustainable Energy at Columbia University. “If we burn the natural gas, there are a lot of CO2 emissions associated with that,” Gadikota said. “But if you just extract the helium and use it, the uses of it don’t contribute necessarily to greenhouse gas emissions. “So from a climate standpoint, if we are going to continue down the line of extracting natural gas and recovering helium,” she added, “I would prefer to see natural gas being used in a form where we directly produce hydrogen and we produce solid carbon.” Hydrogen is a clean burning fuel, and solid carbon can provide permanent carbon sequestration and can be used widely in industrial applications, including rubber and pigments.

Re:They literally sold the last bit two years ago

By evanh • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

LOL, like private stewardship would ever lift a finger without a government mandate. I was the mandate that mattered and always will be. It was mandated important, then it wasn’t, and now it is again.

All this while nothing in the way it gets used has changed in 50 years. Sounds more like corruption, corporates wanting to suckle the government tit.

Re:They literally sold the last bit two years ago

By Anonymous Coward • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread
Stockpiled helium can be purified.

It’s not like your unstockpiled helium comes magically semiconductor grade pure from thin air.

Re:Anything you can do Argon do better

By thegarbz • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

The reason to use helium is clear to the industry which uses it. After all, argon is nearly 30x cheaper and available at scale from ASUs, so someone makes a conscious decision to use helium instead.

As to why, I’m not sure about the technical application requirements, but there are some technical differences I looked up:
- Helium has 10x the thermal conductivity which makes it critical in any cooling system relying on speed or to achieve a ultra-low temperature.
- Argon boils at … okay this is probably the key point here… 85degC warmer! Helium boils at -269C and argon at -185C. That is a huge difference.
- Argon is denser so more difficult to circulate, compress, liquify, etc, so it’s less energy efficient to use in cooling loops, especially small ones.

All the same applies to nitrogen from the looks of things, argon and nitrogen for cooling seem very similar. Everything expect price mind you. Nitrogen is 300x cheaper than helium, so someone must really have thought about why they would need to use the latter.

Re:It’s about time.

By stealth_finger • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

Mining the sun mught be impossible due to the high tenperature.

Go at night.

Re:They literally sold the last bit two years ago

By Rei • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

So, if you care about the actual history, TL/DR, it was your typical “Government Waste!” panic (an earlier version of DOGE-ism).

The first person to really push for getting rid of it was Rep. Christopher Cox (R-CA), who thought it was a stupid government boondoggle. He and his allies in the ‘80s and early ‘90s mocked it as an absurd relic of the ‘20s intended to supply military blimps and dirigibles and pointed out that it had racked up $1,4B in government debt. In 1984 Reagan, launched the Grace Commission (the President’s Private Sector Survey on Cost Control), which was the late 80s equivalent of DOGE (he literally used the phrase “drain the swamp”!), and based on its recommendations, Reagan proposed selling off the reserve in both his FY 1989 and FY 1990 budgets. Then in 1993, under Clinton, VP Gore did his own DOGE (the National Performance Review (NPR)). Once again, privatizing the helium reserve was featured as an objective (Clinton would later, in his 1995 State of the Union, refer to it as one of “over 100 programs we do not need”), but it they decided not to push on it in ‘93 because Clinton needed the support of Rep. Bill Sarpalius (D-TX), whose district housed the reserve in Amarillo. In congress, Republicans took the lead (Democrats were initially more skeptical, though most still supported elimination); after Republicans won control in 1994, they focused on eliminating “obsolete” federal programs as a policy keystone (Rep. John Kasich and Newt Gingrich in particular). By 1996, there was broad bipartisan support, and congress drafted and passed the Helium Privatization Act (H.R. 4168) with near-unanimous support.

The TL/DR is, elected officials LOVE the idea of “cutting government waste”. Their track record of determining what actually is “waste”, however, is not nearly so great. It’s a lot easier for ignorant elected officials to rail against something to an ignorant public with soundbites (“Lol, we’re wasting money preparing for zeppelin-warfare, HAR HAR HAR!”) than it is to take the time to understand the full consequences of what you’re proposing to eliminate.

PHP2Shell Security Flaws Now Successfully Exploited

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
The critical PHP2Shell vulnerabilities (CVE-2026-109618 and CVE-2026-109619) have now been successfully exploited in the wild, just days after patches were released and initial exploitation attempts failed. BleepingComputer reports:
The malicious activity was caught by Adel Karimi, detection and response lead at Perplexity, whose honeypots recorded evidence of confirmed remote code execution against an Apache mod_php installation running PHP 8.4.26. “This is now confirmed RCE with usable memory disclosure, not just a crash followed by a suspicious process. The response delivered an 800 KiB decoded cookie dump, and a function address derived from that dump using the public exploit’s offsets appears in the subsequent execution payload,” Karimi shared.

“The evidence demonstrates this chain on the intentionally favorable single-worker mod_php profile; it is not a measurement of exploit reliability on other worker counts, PHP builds, or applications,” he added. Karimi’s findings were also confirmed by Expel threat researcher Marcus Hutchins, who has been tracking a stream of alleged successful PHP2Shell exploitation reports.

“This is by far the highest quality confirmation of in-the-wild php2shell exploitation I’ve seen so far. Deep technical breakdown of a successful exploitation attempt against an Apache mod_php installation running PHP 8.4.26,” Hutchins said.

Thank goodness

By JustAnotherOldGuy • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

Thank goodness that languages like C, C++, Javascript, Python, and C# are all still completely safe.

mod_php was considered the easiest approach

By CommunityMember • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
The mod_php path was believed (in the security community) as the most likely viable exploit approach. php-fpm, which has been the recommendation for years, is believed to be much harder to exploit (no publicly documented exploit yet. yet. yet). That said, there are going to be a lot of sites who still use mod_php (if it work’s, don’t frack with it (and that presumes you have staff who could actually understand the details and make choices)).

Re:Thank goodness

By ledow • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread

I think we should rewrite everything in Rust and then sprinkle unsafe() around like it was glitter to get most things to work, and then claim it’s more secure because “Hey, at least we put warning cones out around the dangerous bits!”…

AI will finally make the infrastructure safe

By sziring • • Score: 3 • Thread

The Internet is literally glued together with “good enough to ship” code.
Sure, there will be pain at times but at the end of the day, it’ll be more resilient. Don’t think for a second foreign adversaries aren’t looking for an angle to exploit, the same way we are.
Plus, Skynet needs a better backbone if it wants to be resilient.

Re:mod_php was considered the easiest approach

By karmawarrior • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

This appears to be an FPM exploit: https://github.com/KillaBoi/St…

But notice it has to make a huge amount of assumptions about the configuration of the server in order to work. So this kinda sorta underlines the thing you say, assuming the hacker cannot obtain the output of php_info() - it’s not unheard of for PHP devs to include that somewhere so they can check what’s going on. It makes script kiddie stuff a little less likely, though a hacker specifically targetting a specific installation will likely be able to break in.

I’ve read various comments about viable this exploit is, and even submitted a link to someone’s commentary to Slashdot about how it maybe overblown (https://eliastaylor.com/noexploit/) - The infosec community seems genuinely split on it, and I’m not sure this proof of concept is really going to convince anyone right yet.

The reality is we should probably not have acted as if a nuke went off last week, while at the same time we should patch it on a “just in case” basis. The 4 thing was more serious, and remains more serious given the number of IoT devices that’ll accept 4 forever. This, on the other hand, is a good reason to stay up to date.

Skydance Offers Buyouts, Gives 5-Day RTO Order

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Skydance, as it begins integrating Paramount and Warner Bros. Discovery, is offering voluntary buyouts to some employees and imposing a five-day-a-week office requirement. Layoffs are also expected as the company targets more than $6 billion in annualized cost savings within three years. Variety reports:
The new program was outlined by chairman and CEO David Ellison and co-CEO Ynon Kreiz in a memo to staffers Monday. “As we bring our teams together, we recognize that not everyone will see their future here, and we respect that. To give eligible employees the option to move on in a way that works for them, we are introducing a Voluntary Buyout (VBO) Program,” the execs wrote. “Those who qualify will receive an individual communication with their personalized details and terms, and a window to decide whether to accept this one-time offer.”

They added, “Please know we don’t take any of this lightly. We are clear about what we’re building: a company that tells the stories people around the world love, embraces new ways to connect with audiences, and leads the next era of media and entertainment. We have the talent, the creative firepower and the ambition to do it, and we will get there together.”

[…] In the Oct. 26 memo, Ellison and Kreiz also said the new Skydance is moving to a mandatory five-days-per-week in-office policy across the company. “We believe in-person collaboration is vital to our culture and to the success of our business. Especially in a creative company like ours, the best ideas come from people in the same room, sharing perspectives, challenging one another and solving problems,” the execs said. “We truly believe this is in the best interest of our company and our people. We’ve seen the benefits firsthand at Paramount, and we want every part of Skydance to share in them.”

ha

By gabrieltss • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
The “mandatory five-days-per-week in-office policy” is all about quite firing.

Re:ha

By Charlotte • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

In real countries, worker conditions are subject to negotiations, not dictates.

Misplaced resentment

By abulafia • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
I work for a company that successfully went fully remote, so I didn’t experience much of what you’re complaining about.

That said, you’re lecturing the powerless in defense of a scam, and it is kinda gross.

There were literally months of articles and lawsuits predicting Oradance would have to make vicious labor cuts because generally (a) media consolidation plays like this always do, and specifically (b) this outfit is drowning in debt. This was as predictable as a Trump whine after a court loss. I can’t tell if you’re intentionally playing the fool to bang on your personal resentments or not, but Ellison isn’t fooling anyone else.

And back on the WFH thing, if folks in your workplace abused things, that’s a management problem. Lots of other outfits handle it just fine. We let two people go that I know of who couldn’t hold it together without being in an office, early on (I think in 2021). And for several years we’ve been performing better than we were before[1].

If your army is fat and lazy, you replace the commander, not the grunts.

[1] To be clear, I’m not crediting WFH for all that. There are multiple reasons for our performance. But one big change we made when we went remote was instructions to hiring managers to find the best people they could and don’t worry about where they are unless the job required it. And given that geographically we compete with Google and Facebook and the LLM vendors without being able to match pay, that mattered. We’ve picked up a lot of great talent over the last half decade, and most of it has stayed because management is also smart enough to understand the value of retaining people.

Re:ha

By edi_guy • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

The buyouts are a solid indication that Skydance is looking to reduce headcount. Announcing a 5 day RTO policy at the same time shows that the management also views RTO as a pathway to reduced headcount. Less about being quiet and more like being very conspicuous.

Consistent with Paramount’s direction

By CommunityMember • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread
Paramount, after Ellison’s purchase, was in the middle of a RTO process. This latest RTO directive from the combined Skydance company should not have come as a real surprise to staff.

Firefox Tries to Bring Back the Internet’s ‘Good Old Days’

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot
Mozilla launched a new ad campaign for Firefox that leverages early internet nostalgia in a bid to win back users who switched browsers. “Today’s internet tracks you, interrupts you, and asks for permissions it already took. But it wasn’t always that way, and it’s not how it’s supposed to work,” writes Mozilla CEO Anthony Enzor-DeMeo in a post on LinkedIn. “It’s how a few companies decided it should work, because it pays.”

“We’re making a different bet at Firefox. Remember us? Well, we’re still here, and we don’t think the internet should be like this…” The ad features viral internet stars from yesteryear, including Tay Zonday of “Chocolate Rain” fame, Gary Brolsma of “Numa Numa”, Noah Ritter, better known as the “Apparently Kid”, and Laina Morris, the face of the “Overly Attached Girlfriend” meme, among others.

Re:I’m not watching their fucking ad

By jhoegl • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
Cool, Im staying on firefox because ublock origin is allowed, and not root blocked like chromium.
Enjoy your ads.

I like this game

By metac0rtex • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

Remember when I did not have to turn off all of these opt-out settings?

- Firefox home
- Search, Weather, Shortcuts(sponsored), Stories(sponsored)

- Firefox Search
- Perplexity, Bing, Ebay, Google, DDGAI — only disable can’t remove these anymore.
- Trending search suggestions
- Suggestions from Firefox
- Suggestions from Sponsors

- Privacy and Security
- Suggest Firefox Relay email masks
- DNS over HTTPS — I provide my own secure DNS
- Show breach messages (they hash your saved passwords and send to off to 3rd party sites for comparison)
- Block dangerous and deceptive content — again only possible because using Google’s local site blacklists OR sending details about files you downloaded to Google.... this is not opt-in.
- Saved Passwords are not encrypted in any way by default and ofcourse on by default.

- Tabs and Browsing
- Use AI to suggest tabs and a name for tab groups — still on even if you have already opt’d out of ‘AI controls’
- Recommend extensions as you browse
- Recommand features as you browse

- AI Controls
- I’ve disabled this at least 5 times but it keeps re-enabling itself with subsequent updates…

- Permissions and data
- Location, Camera, Device apps and services(recently added and opt-out), Local network devices(recently added and opt-out), Microphone, Virtual Reality
- Send technical and interaction data to Mozilla
- Allow personalized extension recommendations
- Allow Firefox to run feature studies
- Allow Firefox to improve features, performance, and stability between updates (recently added and opt-out) — remember when this was called an ‘update’…?
- Send daily usage ping to Mozilla
- Automatically send crash reports — which will contain lots of details about you, your computer, whatever site you were visiting, files you were downloading and maybe even a crash dump which would have passwords, etc in it.

————-

Even when you turn all of this shite off Firefox will still ping push.services.mozilla.com every few minutes along with a half-dozen other sites like example.org, dns-cloudflare.com and others.

The thing that most people USED to love about Firefox was that it had tabbed browsing and kick ass extensions that let you start with a basic browser and add whatever pieces of functionality that YOU wanted.

Re:Reinstate Brendan Eich NOW!!!

By cjellibebi • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

FireFox started to go downhill at least 3 years before Brendan Eich left in 2014. Most notably was when they started the version-number madness in 2011 starting with 4.0. But even before that, FireFox was starting to have a reputation for adding new features instead of fixing bugs and performance (but at least back then, these were features people actually wanted), and the 3.x versions were notable for having ‘senior moments’.

IIRC the only thing that comes to mind because of Eich’s resignation was that Eich made the decision not to include a certain type of DRM in Firefox, but his successor reversed that decision.

Bring back the throbber, scrollbars and status bar

By ebunga • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

And make viewing certificate info take fewer than four clicks for crying out loud.

Re:good old days?

By awwshit • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

Coward, it sounds like you have never lived. I mean really lived. Nothing beats the trifecta of a Firefox crash into a BSOD and disk corruption on reboot. Have you seen my grey hair? I earned it.