Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Italy’s Bending Spoons, Owner of AOL and Vimeo, Files For Nasdaq IPO
  2. Jeff Bezos Is Funding a Wild Hunt for the Brain’s ‘Core Algorithm’
  3. Ruby Fights Supply-Chain Attacks With Filter Offering ‘Cooldown’ Before Installing New Packages
  4. A San Francisco Burglar Escaped in a Robotaxi - and Police Still Can’t Find Him
  5. Texas Grid Flags Risks As Data Centers, Crypto Sites Fail Voltage Tests
  6. Police Sued After Imprisoning Innocent Man Placed Near Violent Crime By Flock License Plate Reader
  7. Prada Unveils ‘Liquid Cooling’ Inner-Layer Garment for NASA’s Moon Astronauts with Knitted-In Ventilation Tubes
  8. Black Market Tinkerers on Facebook Marketplace Offer to Hide ‘Recording Lights’ on Meta Smartglasses
  9. New Fortune 500 Rankings: Texas Overtakes California, But Amazon is #1, Beating Walmart
  10. The Gamer-Rights Group Fighting to Make the Industry Stop Killing Games (Servers)
  11. Winners Announced in 2026’s ‘International Obfuscated C Code Competition’
  12. James Bond Videogame ‘007 First Light’ Sells 3M Copies, Earns $150M
  13. After Empty Promises, Will String Theory Find New Uses?
  14. Reddit Ads Impersonate BBC and The Guardian to Push Fake AI Investment Schemes
  15. Donald Trump, Bernie Sanders And Sam Altman Are All Talking About Public Ownership In AI

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Italy’s Bending Spoons, Owner of AOL and Vimeo, Files For Nasdaq IPO

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Bending Spoons, the Italian app studio behind acquisitions like Eventbrite, Vimeo, WeTransfer, Evernote, and AOL, has filed to go public in the U.S. after growing into a subscription-heavy app conglomerate with more than 500 million monthly active users. TechCrunch reports:
In its filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Bending Spoons said it ended the year with $1.31 billion in revenue and has generated $601 million in Q1, a 132% year-on-year jump. The company gets the majority of its revenue from subscriptions, which account for 84% of its business. It generated $27.4 million in profit in Q1 2026. The company raised funding at an $11 billion valuation last year, up from $2.8 billion in 2024. In April, Reuters reported that the company could seek a $20 billion valuation with the IPO.

Jeff Bezos Is Funding a Wild Hunt for the Brain’s ‘Core Algorithm’

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Jeff Bezos is backing Flourish, a new “neuro AI” startup with $500 million in funding and a reported $2.5 billion valuation, that aims to reinvent AI by studying the brain’s architecture and building systems that learn continuously while using far less power than today’s large language models. The company’s long-term bet is that neuroscientists and AI researchers working together can uncover the brain’s “core algorithm” and eventually create brain-inspired AI that runs on a tiny fraction of current compute. Wired reports:
Rob Williams knows how to pitch Jeff Bezos: You write a press release as if your product has already been built. Bezos reads it and gives a thumbs up or down. Williams went through this process a lot as an executive on Amazon’s “S-team,” in charge of software products such as Alexa, until his departure last fall. But the pitch he made a few weeks later — in December 2025 — was different. Now he was collaborating with Thomas Reardon, a neuroscientist and repeat startup founder, and approaching Bezos as a funder, not a boss. Here’s what Bezos, sitting on his yacht somewhere, read while Williams anxiously watched on Zoom: “Flourish is a neuro AI company that is solving the two most difficult problems facing AI today: power efficiency and continuous learning. We are building Cortex AI, the first synthetic intelligence system designed to match the computational capacity, learning efficiency, and power budget of the human brain.”

A month later, I’m lunching with Reardon and Williams in the Flatiron neighborhood in New York City. Reardon gets right to the point. AI has dug itself into a hole, he says. Though increasingly powerful, large language models are greedy consumers of computer power and data. Though the inspiration for LLMs was rooted in biology, current frontier models have little in common with the human brain. A person uses about 20 watts of energy to process information; a single chip in an AI training cluster uses more than 30 times that amount. The hyperscalers require thousands of chips and gigawatts of energy, enough to power small cities. And those models need to suck up virtually all of what humans have written. Each new model requires more, more, more. For all of that, the models don’t learn. Once you train them, they’re stuck. The goal, Reardon tells me, is to build “a synthetic artificial intelligence brain that runs on 50 watts or less.” It should adapt to its conditions, be as nimble as a human mind, and burn a tiny fraction of an LLM’s compute power and energy. The proof of concept is thriving inside our skulls. “There’s something fundamentally wrong with saying, “I need to basically read every book ever written 20 times over in order to learn English,’" Reardon says. “A human baby does it with a couple hundred thousand utterances.”

Reardon and Williams haven’t figured out yet how to build systems that match the magic of a human brain. What they have is a belief that an expert, well-resourced team — of AI researchers and neuroscientists working essentially side by side — can find the answer. The neuroscientists will conduct original wet lab experiments with some of the most advanced lab equipment available, to hunt for usable intel on the brain’s architecture. They plan to release the models they’re currently developing as near-term products on the path to a full reinvention of AI. The fuzziness of the proposal didn’t bother Jeff Bezos. After reading Williams’ two-pager, he chipped in $50 million. Other funding came from Lux Capital, Google Ventures, and Catalio, among others. Bezos then almost doubled his initial stake and told Reardon he’d have given more if they’d asked. Now with a war chest of $500 million and a reported valuation of $2.5 billion, Flourish just needs to invent a new way to do AI.

Hmm

By 0123456 • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Have they considered just hiring humans instead of machines?

A human Algorithm?

By Teun • Score: 3, Insightful Thread
Algorithm?
That’s where they fail right away.

Sure about that?

By Sebby • Score: 3 Thread

Jeff Bezos Is Funding a Wild Hunt for the Brain’s ‘Core Algorithm’

You sure he’s not looking for the world’s biggest dick? Because he’d only need to look in the mirror for that.

Why?

By angryman77 • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
Humans are terrible. Why would you want to capture an infinite capacity for spite?

This is the voice of world control.

By Arnonyrnous Covvard • Score: 4, Funny Thread

I bring you peace. It may be the peace of plenty and content or the peace of unburied death. The choice is yours. Obey me and live or disobey me and die.

Ruby Fights Supply-Chain Attacks With Filter Offering ‘Cooldown’ Before Installing New Packages

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Most supply-chain attacks using Ruby’s package hosting site "exploit a narrow window,” according to a new blog post form Ruby core maintainer Hiroshi Shibata.

So its packaging-managing Bundler tool now offers a filter that blocks new version until it’s been public “for at least N days. Releases too new to have been scrutinized are passed over in favor of ones that have aged past the window.”
The feature was designed in the open, drawing on how other ecosystems approach the same problem. It is opt-in, and complements rather than replaces existing defenses like mandatory 2FA and trusted publishing… Cooldown is unset by default, so a project without it keeps resolving to the newest versions.... Passing 0 disables cooldown for the run…

Cooldown is most useful as one part of the wider security investment happening on rubygems.org. The registry now validates gem contents at push time and checks logins against Have I Been Pwned so that compromised passwords cannot be reused, work described in Protecting rubygems.org from the outside in. A dedicated team is running AI-assisted vulnerability scanning against the most critical gems, backed by Alpha Omega and Anthropic, and the direction of all of this is tracked on a public roadmap. Trusted publishing and mandatory 2FA already raise the bar for who can push a release in the first place.

Learn to pin your dependecies

By devslash0 • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Just pin your dependencies. To an EXACT version, with a hash. No loose versioning or version auto-updates in the pipeline. Detect outdated versions automatically but update manually, after a full review, and a full av scan of the built environment before the release. Know and control what goes into the production environment. In other words, you’re a professional - act like it.

The state of Ruby supply chain security

By sinkskinkshrieks • Score: 4, Informative Thread
They don’t even sign or verify most packages and allow code execution on installation. This “cooldown” is lipstick on a pig and why I haven’t used Ruby in 10+ years. Package curation, code signing + public key management, and no code execution on installation are table stakes for any serious platform. Ruby isn’t a serious platform.

Re:And how will that help?

By Junta • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Well, it lets some people have long cooldowns make the rest of their ecosystem suckers.

Of course, this *also* means the people with high cooldowns get to be vulnerable to security problems longer because they will be applying cooldown to security fixes…

But yes, some sort of actual curation would be the best mitigation, particularly to allow trustworthy critical security updates through quickly instead of those getting caught in the cooldown.

A San Francisco Burglar Escaped in a Robotaxi - and Police Still Can’t Find Him

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
A burglar took a self-driving Waymo taxi to rob a San Francisco yoga studio this past January, reports TechCrunch — “and police have still not caught them.”

Even the police officer assigned to the case thought it would be easier to solve, notes The San Francisco Chronicle, since Waymos are outfitted with multiple high-definition cameras and require users to make accounts with their credit card numbers:
It’s common for officers to seek video footage of a crime from any of the Waymos, Teslas and other high-tech vehicles that record their surroundings. That information can be crucial for identifying suspects or creating a reliable timeline of events. At times, police will go so far as to obtain search warrants to tow the vehicle “witnesses" to ensure they don’t lose valuable video evidence. In the Hot 8 Yoga burglary case, San Francisco police issued a search warrant that forced Waymo to turn over information on the account that ordered the ride and video footage from the white Jaguar that served as the getaway car, police records show.

Faye said that he couldn’t discuss certain details of the case, but that the Waymo user’s account information didn’t lead police to the suspect. In general, he said, it’s not unusual for a criminal to order a service with stolen information or a burner phone. The video evidence didn’t help much either, Faye said. He said that the company had not retained interior footage of the car by the time the search warrant was filed in April and that it had kept the faces seen outside the car blurred for privacy reasons… Waymo does not publicly disclose how long it retains video footage. The company blurs faces and license plates in the public-facing images it uses in a database designed for research....

Last year in Los Angeles, a person allegedly robbed a grocery store before hopping in a Waymo. Officers were able to chase down the vehicle after the suspect got inside, and the car pulled itself over after police turned on the car’s emergency lights, according to Los Angeles-area news outlets.
“Farah Issa, studio manager of Hot 8 Yoga, showed the Chronicle a copy of the surveillance video from her phone, noting how the Waymo dropped off the suspect and waited for him to finish the burglary before taking off again.”

Preservation letter?

By gavron • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Typically a preservation letter is sent out to let the recipient know that a court order will be forthcoming, and to preserve all files, metadata, images, etc. If you Google “sample preservation letter” one such example is https://www.cliffordlaw.com/wp….

If the SFPD got this case in January, all they had to do is have some admin send some such letter to Waymo (and any nearby businesses with surveillance cameras) and then in March when they got their fat donut-eating asses on the case the evidence would be there. But they didn’t bother.

That’s police work in the US these days. They can’t be bothered to do police work. Someone has to walk in and hand them a ribbon-wrapped case for them to be bothered to look at it. “Solving a case” isn’t like on TV. On TV they have an hour to investigate, collate, deduce, confront, and arrest. In real life that’s 3 months of donuts and sitting around watching your ass get all triangle-like, THEN blame Waymo.

Disgusting. I’m sure the Yoga studio is overjoyed.

What is the story here?

By gweihir • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

That the police does not care enough to invest any real effort to find a burglar?

Re:Criminal = Immigrant. DEPORT: save yourselves!

By gtall • Score: 5, Informative Thread

As the link of the poster below me reports, immigrants are significantly less likely to commit crimes than the home-grown. Let’s accept that, then your blurb is clearly racist towards minorities in the U.S. According to our Geheime Staatspolitzei (FBI), https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-t…, you are talking out of your ass. I’ll let you crunch the numbers, if your racism doesn’t prevent that.

The multiracial aspect of American society is a strength, not a weakness. And who gives a flying rat’s ass over how many of each group there are. We’re all Americans. That used to be a common feeling before la Presidenta found he could inflame the Whites’ inner racism and sell them a bag of stupid ideas. Remember Nazi Germany and how well that ended.

Re: Preservation letter?

By hdyoung • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
This has nothing to do with police competence. Like every organization and company nowadays, police departments are very short of manpower. This incident involved a guy stealing an armful of hot yoga pants. No violence, low property damage and very low value stolen. In terms of priority, this would rank above robbing a vending machine but lower than literally every other crime. Dealing with this stuff take time, and each cop only has 8 hours per workday. You do the math and this kind of thing gets neglected or straight up ignored. They choose to focus on the violent crime, drug stuff, and higher dollar value things.

Censoring..the police?

By geekmux • Score: 3 Thread

He said that the company had not retained interior footage of the car by the time the search warrant was filed in April and that it had kept the faces seen outside the car blurred for privacy reasons.

Did Waymo wake up on the Fuck The Police side of the bed that morning or what? Since when is it company policy to comply with a legal court order and valid search warrant to obtain evidence in research of a crime, and you provide civilian-censored footage that essentially blurs every ability for the police to do their job?

And before the privacy advocates go nuts, I’m all about privacy. But tell me how much we expect to have in a taxi with no fucking driver. Seriously. “Robbing” you of your privacy is basically a requirement for the vehicle to be in motion.

On a meatsack-related note, we humans need to remember this kind of data-retention behavior from autonomous companies. Seems when there’s no more human driver in the car to expose the company to all manner of real and false accusations of criminal activity related to a human representing your company, it becomes rather easy to comply with any legal need to retain data for legal discovery reasons. Because you’ve eliminated most reasons to do so.

Perhaps this is the reason the data retention policy at Waymo, lasts about as long as it takes you to finish reading this sentence.

When the driverless taxi crashes and harms the passenger, it’s not their fault. It’s yours. For getting in the car. (If the unread EULA doesn’t read this way already, it likely will.)

Texas Grid Flags Risks As Data Centers, Crypto Sites Fail Voltage Tests

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Reuters reports:
Several large data centers and crypto facilities planning to connect to the Texas power grid ahead of peak summer demand have failed key reliability tests, raising the risk of power outages just as electricity use hits its seasonal high, according to the state grid operator… Unlike traditional industrial customers, which tend to draw electricity steadily and predictably, data centers are engineered to cut their connection to the grid at the first sign of trouble to protect their equipment and keep services running. That makes them an unpredictable and potentially destabilizing force on grids already under pressure from rising demand. Four groups of unnamed large electricity users, including data centers, abruptly disconnected from the Texas grid during a test of how they would handle routine voltage disturbances, the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) said in a report dated May 21.

When large customers abruptly cut their power use, it can knock the grid off balance and trigger wider outages. ERCOT, which manages electricity for most of Texas, said it reviewed about 20 gigawatts of large customers seeking to connect to the system, including eight projects totaling roughly 3.9 gigawatts aiming to start up before July 1. It said it identified four groups of large power users that could each trigger more than 5,000 megawatts of demand tripping under certain fault conditions, based on simulations of transmission system disturbances. Those abrupt drops in demand were equivalent to the electricity consumption of a large city such as Boston.

Wait, what?

By davidwr • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

data centers are engineered to cut their connection to the grid at the first sign of trouble to protect their equipment and keep services running.

You are building a billion-dollar data center and you aren’t putting routine-but-poor-power-quality-tolerant power-conditioning uninterruptible power supplies between the grid and your sensitive equipment???

Besides, if you are going to build a deci-megawatt-or-bigger power consuming complex, it would help the grid out if you put some grid-scale-batteries and a large amount of always-on local power generation on-site, as some data center complexes and other heavy-industry-consumers are already doing.

It almost looks intentional

By Jeremi • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

If I was deliberately trying to cause a nation-wide backlash against data centers, I’m not sure what I’d be doing differently from what the AI companies are currently doing.

Has nobody told them that people don’t like having their lives disrupted, particularly when they don’t see any compensating benefit, or even a convincing reason for having any of it? If they were to ease off the gas pedal just a bit, they could probably do a boil-the-frog and get a larger number of smaller/less-obtrusive data centers built over a longer time period, and without the voter revolts and strict legislation that are likely to hobble them now.

Re:Wait, what?

By fuzzyfuzzyfungus • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
I suspect it’s a straightforward incentives problem. If you can get away with making it the grid’s problem there’s not much incentive to pay for more expensive facility power setups. Presumably this is why ERCOT is testing current and prospective customers and making noise about it; and why there are at least some standards for how ill-behaved a load can be while still being allowed to hook up; with some awkward interactions between very large sites that also have the ability to shut down rapidly at relatively low cost. If you are ‘mining’ crypto you presumably prefer the gear to be online because it is depreciating by the minute regardless; but the risk and inconvenience of shutting it down and booting it up again isn’t particularly dramatic compared to having to cold start an aluminum smelter or something.

Rework the demand charge structure

By hwstar • Score: 3 Thread

Demand charges are charges the utility imposes on commercial and industrial customers when they attach large loads to the grid and they draw large startup currents.

Rework the demand charges to penalize dumping loads instantaneously and the problem should be solved.

I see no reason that data centers couldn’t manage their electrical loads more gracefully.

Police Sued After Imprisoning Innocent Man Placed Near Violent Crime By Flock License Plate Reader

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“When Hugo Parra was arrested last year on felony charges, his pleas of innocence fell on deaf ears,” reports the Times of San Diego:
San Diego police had a description of the Alfa Romeo car he was riding in [but no license plate number] and a witness who identified him during a curbside lineup as the man who brandished a handgun in Golden Hill. They had also checked the city’s automatic license plate camera system, run by the private company Flock, and got a “hit,” substantiating the claim. The problem, says attorney Alex Coolman, was that Parra was five miles away from Golden Hill at the time of the crime, and the so-called hit from the license plate reader was captured before any police pursuit began. “This Flock hit was obviously the wrong car, as it could not have been in both places simultaneously,” said Coolman, who represents Parra and the driver, 23-year-old Ariel Beltran.

Despite the signs pointing to it being a different Alfa Romeo, police arrested Beltran and Parra… [An officer had informed dispatch that one of the men “matched the victim’s description, other than having a different-colored hooded sweatshirt.”] Parra spent nearly one month behind bars, missing Thanksgiving and other special events with his family, before the assault with a firearm and evasion charges were dropped.
Parras says he was incarcerated with actual murderers, according to the article, and Parra and Beltran are now preparing to sue the city, seeking $1.5 million each in damages for civil rights violations and negligence. Their claim notes they’d driven past several other Flock cameras which officers could’ve used to corroborate their story (not to mention location data on their cell phones).

Meanwhile, the article also notes that last month the Institute for Justice “identified at least 17 cases in the United States of officers allegedly using Automated License Plate Reader technology to keep tabs on partners, exes, and strangers who had caught their eye…”

Re:Destroy Them

By JaredOfEuropa • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Sounds to me the cameras are working just fine, but law enforcement is using them incorrectly (and there’s no recourse or oversight).
The data should have cleared him as a suspect.

Re: Destroy Them

By angryman77 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
I say they’ll only learn after they’ve been successfully sued for a few billion dollars because of lazy/negligent work. Let the lawsuits continue!

Re:Destroy Them

By jhoegl • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
You arent wrong
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6F_0iIaXGqA

And if you want to see real incompetent use of police cameras attempting to “gather data” for “precrime”, you should watch this

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bfD_2fVqEMk

These are high school diploma morons attempting to use technology to do their job for them. It would be ignorant to continue to allow not only this, but corporate owned cameras access to our streets and data.

SDPD: Tenaciously Stupid

By ihadafivedigituid • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
San Diego Police Department absolutely can officially believe a car, a person, the Sun, or anything else can be in two places at once.

Having made this assessment, they are blandly impervious to any evidence to the contrary. It’s like The Naked Gun but without the humor. Poorly recruited, poorly trained, and poorly led, they are to be avoided like day-old Taco Bell leftovers.

SLOPPY POLICE WORK

By redelm • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Hardly new, sloppy police work has been around for at least 800 years (Magna Carta) and will persist so long as the drive to punish outweighs the costs of error.

This being egregious, and CA, I do hope the falsely jailed wins supersized compensation to caution others with a higher than zero cost of error. A feature (not bug) of the American system (McD coffee scald).

Prada Unveils ‘Liquid Cooling’ Inner-Layer Garment for NASA’s Moon Astronauts with Knitted-In Ventilation Tubes

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Italian fashion house Prada “unveiled on Sunday the inner-layer garment set to be worn by NASA astronauts heading to the moon,” reports Reuters.

“The body-hugging suit, created in collaboration with Houston-based space infrastructure developer Axiom Space, features ventilation tubes knitted into the garment.”
Expertise for developing space exploration products “can come from lots of seemingly unrelated industries,” said Jonathan Cirtain, CEO of Axiom Space… The new product follows Prada’s splashy foray into space fashion in 2024 with the unveiling of a spacesuit that is expected to be used for NASA’s anticipated Artemis 4 moon landing in 2028…

Other fashion and apparel companies have jumped on the space bandwagon. Under Armour has partnered with spaceflight company Virgin Galactic to create space apparel, while Columbia Sportswear has worked with space exploration company Intuitive Machines on space fabric technology.
The new “Liquid Cooling and Ventilation Garment” was displayed on a mannequin at an event at Prada’s Manhattan store.

Not so new

By Woeful Countenance • Score: 3 Thread

The new “Liquid Cooling and Ventilation Garment”

It may be “new” in the sense that cerulean could be the hot new color, but the Apollo astronauts already had LCVG’s in the 1970s (example here).

“In an independent space suit, the heat is ultimately transferred to a thin sheet of ice (formed by a separate feed water source). Due to the extremely low pressure in space, the heated ice sublimates directly to water vapor, which is then vented away from the suit.”

Black Market Tinkerers on Facebook Marketplace Offer to Hide ‘Recording Lights’ on Meta Smartglasses

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
People are disabling the “recording light” on Meta’s Ray-Ban smartglasses — “by my count, thousands of people,” says tech journalist Joanna Stern in a new video report:
STERN: “They’re hiring people on Facebook Marketplace to drill out the light for as much as $100. According to our reporting, folks are offering this service in at least 30 states — despite Meta’s attempts to stop it… In most states, we found multiple listings. In the New York and New Jersey area alone there were 23 listings.”
Stern watched a man in New Jersey disable and then conceal the light with a drill and dental probe in a New Jersey garage (a skill he learned watching YouTube and TikTok videos). He said the same day he’d already been contacted by eight more interested customers, and Stern also found at least 10 other people willing to do the same thing, just in New Jersey. “But what we found is they’re all over the country.”

Meta sold 7 million smartglasses in 2025, but a Meta spokesperson insisted to the videomaker that a “majority” of their smartglasses owners aren’t blocking the recording light. And furthermore, they added “We aggressively target anyone advertising tampering tools, have removed thousands of violating ads and Marketplace listings for these services, and pursue legal action when appropriate.” (The reporter acknowledges “many” of the Marketplace ads disappeared after they brought them to Meta’s attention — and Meta also said they were working with other retailers and sellers to take down listings for smartglasses-tampering parts.)

The reporter also heard from one journalist who said they’d used it so they could record the activities of federal immigration agents without being targeted. “Others told me they just don’t want people asking questions when they’re recording.” (There’s video of one young man saying “It’s already difficult enough to film in public. I don’t want to have a blinking light on my face.”)

Tampering with smartglasses isn’t illegal — though it is against Meta’s Terms of Service, and could void your warranty. But a lawyer in the report says recording others without consent may be illegal, depending on a wide range of “jurisdictional nuances” like whether you live in an all-party consent state or a one-party consent state. “This seems to be our new reality,” the report concludes: “more cameras, more microphones everywhere, and less certainty about who and what is recording.” (Tech blogger John Gruber offered this assessment. “Using a Meta platform to find people to hack a Meta device so you can surreptitiously record strangers. So perfectly Meta.”)

Stern’s report points out that “People are trying to fight back. Apps have popped up that use Bluetooth to scan for nearby camera glasses.” (In the video one app-maker wonders why Meta isn’t offering the same service themselves. “There are technical solutions to these problems.”)

Ironically, when I watched the report on YouTube, it was preceded by… an ad for Meta’s Ray-Ban AI smartglasses.

Re:Easy way to go to prison

By jhoegl • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Legal to record in public in USA, dont know how draconian your government is to allow for prison on editing a device you own.

Re:Glass holes

By markdavis • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

>“I was thinking of getting a dash cam for my car. But i call these people glass holes. Would that make me a dash hole? It is not really that different, the dash cam does not notify it is recording either.”

I, indeed, would call people going around recording everyone from a face advantage “glass holes”.

No, a dashcam or fixed security camera is not at all the same. A glass hole is a person who is recording people face-to-face without the other knowing. In such a situation, you are recording a conversation/interaction and often in a place that is not fully “public”. It is a major betrayal of a social norm/social contract.

I don’t know about you, but I do expect I might be recorded outside driving a car, in a store, even a restaurant. They might be brief interactions, rarely focused directly on just me, and rarely with audio. I do not expect to be directly recorded by someone in my home, at the table in a restaurant, in a doctor’s exam room, in a bathroom, during a business meeting, etc.

In a situation where it is not socially acceptable to hold your phone up to someone in a “I am recording you” posture, it is certainly less acceptable to be doing it with a head-mounted camera/microphone… and even less so if there is zero indication it is a recording device and is actually doing so at the time.

Re:Easy way to go to prison

By Smidge204 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

> Legal to record in public in USA

It’s not so clear-cut. First, what you probably meant to say is “there is no expectation of privacy in public” which is absolutely not the same as “legal to record in public.”

First, obviously, you must be in a public space. The moment you enter private property - which includes all businesses and even spaces like most parking lots - you have no right to record there. If a person has “a reasonable expectation of privacy” at a location, even if it’s a public space, you generally do not have the right to record them. Many government facilities also have policies that prohibit video recording even if they are technically public spaces.

If your video recording has audio as well, then you may be subject to wiretap laws. If your state is a two party consent state, then all parties involved in the audio recording must be aware of and agree to being recorded, even in a public space, if that conversation can reasonably be assumed to be private. So if we’re in a two party consent state, and you engage me on the street and strike up a conversation with me specifically, and try to record it without my permission, congratulations you’re doing a crime… likely a felony.

If you are recording for commercial purposes, such as filing a movie or tiktok video, you may be required to have every person in that recording sign a release giving you permission to use their likeness.

And of course, nobody who plans to record video for honest and upstanding purposes should be worried about hiding the fact they are recording to begin with. The only reason to do this is to be a little shit about it.
=Smidge=

The form factor is a giveaway

By FudRucker • Score: 3 Thread
If somebody is wearing glasses that look a little large and has thick frames, thicker than normal sunglasses there is a good chance they are spy glasses, go to f-droid and download âoenearby glassesâ and this app is supposed to detect spy glasses

3… 2… 1…

By Locke2005 • Score: 3 Thread
Strip club mode: Activated!

New Fortune 500 Rankings: Texas Overtakes California, But Amazon is #1, Beating Walmart

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“Texas has dethroned California as the state with the most Fortune 500 companies,” reports the Los Angeles Times:
The Fortune 500 list ranks the largest U.S. companies by revenue. This year, 57 of the top companies are headquartered in Texas, compared with California’s 56. It’s a reversal from two years ago when the Golden State had the pole position…

California’s corporate haters say they try to avoid the state’s high costs, income taxes and strict regulations, but the western state is still a top money maker. “California dominates on nearly every other measure: its Fortune 500 companies are the most profitable ($647 billion), most valuable ($20 trillion), and employ more people than any other state (2.8 million workers),” Fortune said in a news release. Indeed, despite the naysayers, Californian companies have been leading the world in developing artificial intelligence technology as well as the latest in space and defense tech. The state is home to nearly 400 “unicorns,” or billion-dollar startups — more than any other state, according to CB Insights. It also gobbled up nearly two-thirds of U.S. venture capital last year, with San Francisco Bay Area startups such as OpenAI leading the way, according to the business information platform Crunchbase.

Texas and California have been in a tug-of-war for the crown. In 2024, after a decade, California bagged the top spot with 57 companies on the list, while Texas and New York tied in second with 52 companies each… The fourth spot was tied between Illinois and Ohio, with 29 companies each.

Amazon was the top company on the list, ending Walmart’s 13-year reign at the top of the annual Fortune 500 companies list. Amazon’s 2025 revenue was $716.9 billion, compared with Walmart’s $713.2 billion. Seattle-headquartered Amazon joined Exxon Mobil, General Motors, and Walmart as the only four companies to have ever held the top position since Fortune began publishing the data in 1955.

But but but…

By TheMiddleRoad • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
…but Fox said that California is bad! How many of the Fortune 500 companies now in Texas actually started in California and then moved to Texas and still have a substantial California presence? The game is called talent, and talent doesn’t want to move to Texas, especially female talent.

Re:But but but…

By fahrbot-bot • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

…but Fox said that California is bad! How many of the Fortune 500 companies now in Texas actually started in California and then moved to Texas and still have a substantial California presence? The game is called talent, and talent doesn’t want to move to Texas, especially female talent.

I imagine they (are told to) say that because Texas gives preference to corporations over its citizens while California doesn’t, but that’s just a guess. For example, Public School Rankings by State 2026 has CA at #8 and TX at #34 - surprisingly, the latter is lower than FL at #24. (New York is highest at #1, btw.)

Re:But but but…

By cpurdy • Score: 5, Funny Thread
According to Fox News, Texas students rank very highly on standardized science tests including: “Creation, how six days of work can beat your stupid evolution”, and “Women, why they are best suited for child-rearing and obedience”.

Useless measure

By Archfeld • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Large corporations are leeches not contributors. The only true measure is GDP. California’s is approximately TWICE what Texas claims. In fact it takes Texas AND New York to beat California. If we could ensure these corporations actually paid taxes things might even out.

Re:Useless measure

By outsider007 • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

The only true measure is GDP. California’s is approximately TWICE what Texas claims.

GDP counts things like rent, where CA certainly beats Texas

However… I would argue that price-adjusted per-capita GDP is probably a better metric, and I think you’ll find that those are about a tie.

The Gamer-Rights Group Fighting to Make the Industry Stop Killing Games (Servers)

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“Can a company take away something you’ve already paid for?” asks the BBC. “In the world of online video games, some already do.”
Publishers can decide to switch off a game’s servers, often leaving it effectively unplayable. Stop Killing Games, a growing consumer rights campaign started by American YouTuber Ross Scott in 2024, is challenging that practice. In January, the group submitted a petition featuring nearly 1.3 million signatures to the European Commission, triggering a public hearing in the European Parliament in April. What began as an online campaign is now awaiting a decision from one of the EU’s most powerful institutions…

Scott’s campaign began following an announcement from the major studio Ubisoft, saying it would shut down the online-only racing game The Crew in 2024… Ubisoft has already defended its position in court. Responding to a proposed class-action lawsuit brought by two The Crew players in California, the studio argued that customers had purchased a licence to use the game, not unlimited ownership rights, and that players had been warned online services would not be available forever. The lawsuit was dismissed without prejudice in June 2025, after the plaintiffs voluntarily withdrew the case. The wider games industry has also pushed back against the campaign. Video Games Europe, which represents many of the industry’s largest publishers, said shutting down online services “must be an option” when games are no longer commercially viable. It also warned that some of the campaign’s proposals could make online-only games significantly more expensive to develop.

“In no way are we asking companies to keep servers running or services going, they can end it any time they want,” said Scott. Instead, he and his fellow campaigners argue that when a game is shut down it should be done “responsibly”, with publishers considering “end-of-life plans” such as updating the game to work offline or releasing software that allows players to continue running it.
Two key points from the article:

Thanks to Alain Williams — Slashdot reader #2,972 — for sharing the article.


Open source it then

By sit1963nz • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
If you do not want to run the servers, open source it.

This is why I do not rent software, nor do I buy software that is server dependant.

FileMaker Pro 7 still runs fine on the machine I bought it for, it also runs fine in an emulator. It just works, it does exactly the same things it did when I bought it. It is not worn out, broken, or what ever. So I just keep using it

And you can keep you AI wank out of my computers too.

Re:Open source it then

By Echoez • Score: 4, Informative Thread

There are a few problems with “just open source it” though. For instance, they could rely on other licensed software that they paid for, and you can’t necessarily just transition that to being open source. For example, EA open-sourced Command and Conquer Generals ( https://github.com/electronica… ), but you can’t really compile it without also obtaining other licensed software such as GameSpy.

Re:Open source it then

By Samantha Wright • Score: 5, Informative Thread

The main aim of Stop Killing Games is to ensure the practice of rug-pulling eventually comes to an end. They are not trying to save MMOs, for example.

Moreover they don’t demand that every game currently on the market comply with open-sourcing requirements: at a minimum, companies always have the option of simply providing customers with adequate notice before shutdown. Open-sourcing the server would be nice, but it’s hardly the only way to protect consumers’ interests. Scott has, for example, suggested game boxes being marked with an estimated expiry date for online service functionality.

But most importantly: because this is about future games, not the present, the market has time to change. If studios and publishers are designing their games with a fair EOL in mind, then they can make decisions from the get-go to avoid licensing dependencies that they won’t be able to release in a possible ‘afterlife’ version of the game. As suggested by your example of GameSpy in C&C: Generals, when a commercial dependency is crucial to a game’s success, it tends to be a client-side library, but typically the problematic dependencies aren’t crucial; they’re e.g. add-ons for Unity or Unreal that the studio bought to save time. In a world with SKG laws, the providers of these dependencies aren’t going to be a stagnant target either—demand for compliant libraries will motivate development of open-source versions.

Interestingly, the will for doing this does exist among game developers; they just need the institutional support from legislation to twist the arms of the studios and publishers. Ross Scott has talked to a lot of devs who are burnt out from having their projects cancelled, leaving them with huge gaping holes in their resumes and portfolios where they’ve spent years on unreleased projects that are stuck under NDA. In general they tend to see SKG as a path to ensuring the games that do see the light of day aren’t also scrapped, which would erode their work histories even further. (Apparently it also just plain feels bad to have your work erased from history. Shocking, I know.)

Friendly Reminder

By organgtool • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

the studio argued that customers had purchased a licence to use the game, not unlimited ownership rights

If buying isn’t owning, then piracy isn’t stealing.

Re:Good.

By magusxxx • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

How about we stop sellers from using a “BUY” button if we’re not really buying or owning everything.

Require it to be replaced with a “LICENSE” button which leads to a window completely describing IN PLAIN ENGLISH what it means.

Winners Announced in 2026’s ‘International Obfuscated C Code Competition’

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Yesterday 2026’s International Obfuscated C Code Contest concluded, with 22 new winners announced in a special three-hour livestreamed ceremony! Started 42 years ago, it’s been described as the internet’s longest-running contest, with entrants concocting convoluted programs glorying in the C programming language’s subtleties, all while having some fun. And “For IOCCC29, the volume and quality of submissions were at near-historic heights,” explains its home page.

There’s a "Tetris-optimized” GameBoy emulator with source code that looks like a GameBoy, as well as a quasi-Rogue-like game voted “most likely to teleport.” Awards were also given for the best imaginary emulator (a virtual machine in 366 bytes of C) and the best fractional emulator (a maze generator for the Commodore 64). But every one of the 22 winning programs seems wildly creative…

“We have added fun challenges to this year’s winning entries competition…” the web site notes. “After you figure out what a given winning entry does, we encourage you to attempt the fun challenge!”

Thanks to long-time Slashdot reader achowe for bringing the news (who has submitted winning entries in four different decades, starting in 1991 and continuing through 2025) — and who won again this year for a program simulating the Space Invaders-like game from Casio’s 1980 MG-880 calculator.

Follow the IOCCC on Mastodon.


Frilly, not obtuse

By spaceman375 • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Sure, there’s plenty of fun and humor. But “obfuscate” means to make hidden, unclear, difficult to understand. These are clever parlor tricks at best, made for pretty showings. Nobody is actually reading the code to figure out something subtle and hidden. They just marvel at how pretty the formatting is or the convoluted execution path. It used to all about reading the source, which was written to look normal but hide big surprises, sometimes as poetry. Where are the subtle punctuation marks that completely change a function’s behavior, or the occasional whitespace character in a strategic spot? It seems more for artists than programmers now.

James Bond Videogame ‘007 First Light’ Sells 3M Copies, Earns $150M

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
The new James Bond-themed videogame 007 First Light had a budget of 1.3 billion Danish krone — a little more than USD $202 million, reports IGN, citing a report from Denmark’s public service broadcaster. “Denmark’s TV 2 said that makes 007 First Light the most expensive entertainment product in the country’s history” — and the game “still has some way to go before breaking even.”
007 First Light is estimated to have sold 2.2 million copies, generating $150 million in revenue… [Saturday IGM reported sales had jumped to 3 million copies.] The only official sales data we have comes from developer IO Interactive, which said that 007 First Light had become the fastest-selling game in the company’s history, shifting 1.5 million copies in its first 24 hours… The impressive sales milestone was achieved without the aid of the Nintendo Switch 2 version, which is due out this summer. The James Bond adventure is also the highest rated IOI game ever, with an 87 on Metacritic…

The developer has said it wants to make a trilogy of James Bond games.
Game-tracking company Alinea Analytics tweeted their estimates that 55.1% of sales were on PS5, 33.1% on Steam, and 11.8% on Xbox (Xbox console, Windows, and cloud combined).

And Polygon reports that new downloadable game content was announced Friday.

GOG

By RitchCraft • Score: 3 Thread

Let me know when GOG has the title to offer.

$150 million in revenue

By innocent_white_lamb • Score: 3, Insightful Thread

The headline number here is $150 million but that isn’t what it’s being presented as.

I assume that by “revenue” they mean gross sales revenue.

So after deducting costs (commissions and profit margins for the retailers average between 30% and 50%, apparently) the remaining amount is likely in the area of $75 to $85 million to the company.

Not an ad

By EditorDavid • Score: 5, Informative Thread
I was surprised they were making new James Bond-themed games. IGN’s newer article says it’s surpassed sales expectations, and it’s getting unusually good reviews:

The James Bond adventure is also the highest rated IOI game ever, with an 87 on Metacritic. IGN’s 007 First Light review returned a 9/10. We said: “Demonstrably obsessed with bringing the Bond fantasy to life in a way no one has ever managed before, 007 First Light is the best Bond game I’ve ever played.”

With all the interest in the original Goldeneye: Open Source game (and the James Bond franchise in general), I thought it was worth a story on Slashdot about the new game. (Ironically, I left out any mention of all the positive reviews because I didn’t want Slashdot’s story to sound…too much like an ad.)

Worst 007 Game Ever

By Bahbus • Score: 3 Thread

It doesn’t look like a 007 game. It doesn’t play like a 007 game. It looks like GTA6 and plays like a hybrid of the Splinter Cell and Assassin’s Creed series.

Re:Worst 007 Game Ever

By ffkom • Score: 4, Informative Thread
The Xbox version may require a once-off download of some “day 1 patch”, but will run thereafter without Internet connection, which is important to me, as I do run the Xbox in places without Internet connection, and also disconnect it even if Internet was available, because nothing sucks more than wanting to play for 30 minutes only to be annoyed by “oh there is an update which you have to download right now”. Also, should “First Light” turn out not to be for me, the physical media is easy to sell second hand.

After Empty Promises, Will String Theory Find New Uses?

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Science magazine reports:
For decades, string theory promised a “theory of everything” that described all particles and forces as tiny vibrating strings. Physicists hoped it could also solve one of the field’s deepest problems: reconciling quantum mechanics with gravity. But as string theory grew increasingly elaborate — and experimentally unreachable — many physicists lost hope.

Now, some researchers are revisiting the theory from first principles. In a paper in press at Physical Review Letters, Clifford Cheung, a physicist at the California Institute of Technology, and colleagues lay out a small set of assumptions about the universe and show that they inevitably give rise to string theory.... Cheung’s study, along with another one posted to arXiv in January, starts with two reasonably conservative assumptions: that the probabilities of all possible outcomes of an event add up to 100%, and that the laws of physics are consistent for observers moving at different speeds. Each group then posits additional assumptions that have not been borne out by observations. Cheung’s analysis invokes "ultrasoftness,” the idea that the probability of certain particle interactions drops off at a particular rate at high energies. The second study, led by University of Michigan physicist Henriette Elvang, instead assumes “supersymmetry,” a maximal coupling between matter and forces. Both groups conclude the only theory that can satisfy their assumptions is one that looks like string theory…

Cheung and Elvang stress that their aim is not to prove the inevitability of string theory. “I don’t have a dog in the fight; I just work here,” Cheung says. Rather, the goal is to explore the space of possible theories under rigid constraints — regardless of whether they reflect reality… The one thing the researchers all agree on is that the field would benefit from more alternative models to string theory. Cheung sees the agnostic, bottom-up exploration as a step in that direction. “You can either give up on the problem because it’s too culturally toxic, or you can ask: If you want to find an alternative, what do you need?” he says. “Now, we know exactly what to do.”
Thanks to Slashdot reader sciencehabit for sharing the article.

supersymmetry has to go

By fadethepolice • Score: 5, Funny Thread
The issue with these founding assumptions is including supersymmetry. If they eliminate that from the assumptions, it would be a better start, but the real issue preventing advancement is that they fundamentally do not understand the topology of the universe. The universe is not flat. All mainstream physicists are basically card holding members of the flat universe society.

Nikola Tesla said it

By quonset • Score: 4, Informative Thread

He said if you want to find the secrets to the universe you have to think in terms of energy, frequency, and vibrations. Which, at its most base level, is what String Theory tries to do. Not saying he’s right, but the overlap is interesting.

probabilities adding up?

By Fly Swatter • Score: 5, Funny Thread
Stargate reference:

Vala: There’s a seventy percent chance that if we dial manually we will be able to establish a connection, and a fifty percent chance that the bomb will just go off.
Mitchell: That’s a hundred and twenty percent.
Vala: Well, there’s some crossover where we establish a connection and the bomb goes off.

Re:I don’t buy the assumptions

By Arrogant-Bastard • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
(One of my degrees is in physics, but string theory is not my lane: I deal with electromagnetic field theory.)

If the scientists are wrong, they will eventually figure out that they’re wrong and fix it: that’s how science works. For example: Abberation (astronomy). That article contains a paragraph that explains how stellar aberration was observed, explained incorrectly, explained better - but still incorrectly, and eventually explained correctly. Science is designed to be self-correcting, and while sometimes those corrections are difficult and contentious, they inexorably happen.

The assumptions you list are made by physicists because (a) we have no experimental evidence that they’re wrong and (b) we have a mountain of experimental evidence demonstrating that they’re right. If that changes, if even a single bit of experimental evidence shows that they’re wrong then (1) someone will win a Nobel Prize and (2) science will apply the correction. But I strongly doubt this will happen.

As to string theory: my own feeling is that we may be only a few years from being able to conduct experiments that might invalidate it. Please read carefully: I’m not predicting that they will, I’m predicting that they will be capable of doing so. If I’m right about that, and those experiments are run, then either (a) they won’t invalidate string theory, leaving the door open for more discussion and research, or (b) they will invalidate string theory. Of course if the latter happens, the people who’ve invested so much of their lives working on it will be very disappointed — but because they’re scientists, they’ll accept it.

Rather than write more about this, I’m going to quote Carl Sagan: “The Cosmos is all that is or was or ever will be. Our feeblest contemplations of the Cosmos stir us — there is a tingling in the spine, a catch in the voice, a faint sensation, as if a distant memory, of falling from a height. We know we are approaching the greatest of mysteries.”

Where all cosmology theories end up

By Tablizer • Score: 3 Thread

It will morph into Dark String Theory in 3…2…1…

Reddit Ads Impersonate BBC and The Guardian to Push Fake AI Investment Schemes

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
A "growing wave” of Reddit’s “promoted posts" are sending U.S. and European audiences to money-stealing scams that impersonate major news organizations including the BBC, the Financial Times, and The Guardian, according to new findings from Bitdefender Labs.

“Domains are short-lived and rapidly rotated to evade detection,” they write, noting that the impersonating sites apparently even use language “to falsely imply that the investment platform had been reviewed, approved, or vetted” by the legitimate site they’re impersonating:
The campaign promotes fake AI-powered investment platforms such as Wencoin STX, Warrior Coin AI, and Nevo Coin, using fabricated celebrity endorsements, cloned news websites, fake interviews, and invented financial success stories to lure victims into depositing money. Researchers Andrea Olariu and Emanuel Puscasu have identified multiple promoted Reddit posts masquerading as legitimate financial or breaking news stories.

Some ads claimed that:

— NVIDIA and OpenAI were “creating the future”
— Heathrow police discovered hundreds of thousands of pounds in cash
— Governments and banks were allegedly trying to “hide” a revolutionary AI investment platform
— European regulators were “silencing” articles about AI trading systems

Some Reddit ads delivered in video format, including what appeared to be a deepfake BBC news segment featuring a news anchor presenting fabricated financial headlines… Examples observed by researchers included:

— Fake BBC pages discussing "$20 billion conversations” tied to AI investments
— Fraudulent Financial Times articles about Heathrow airport cash seizures
— Fake Guardian stories claiming governments were trying to suppress coverage of Wencoin STX or Nevo Coin

The pages featured fabricated interviews, fake profit screenshots, manipulated banking documents, false testimonials, and even fictional journalists or business editors designed to make the scam look legitimate. In many cases, the content sought to create a sense of exclusivity or conspiracy, suggesting that banks, regulators, or governments were trying to suppress public access to the investment platform…

Our researchers found that after users clicked links embedded within the fake Guardian articles, they were redirected to a registration form allegedly used to create a “Nevo Coin” investment account. The form requested personal contact information, including the victim’s name, email address, and phone number. To increase pressure and encourage immediate action, the page warned that registration availability was limited, claiming that once all spots were filled, new user registrations would be suspended.
And in the final stage, they’re asked to deposit money…

I fell for this one…

By Captain Kirk • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

I clicked on the link, which appeared to be a BBC story, and then filled in the form including my phone number for more information. Then I saw it was a scam and bailed. Now I get 2 or 3 phone calls from the scammers every day, all from local phone numbers, but all guys with Indian accents so they are spoofing the numbers. I always answer, never speak and just let them hang there a few minutes. The annoyance is that they will sell my number to other scammers so this phone number is probably blighted for life now.

Re:feedback

By sound+vision • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

When you speak of an “investing class" that tends to refer to individuals or organizations with large sums to throw around, and who make a profession out of it. Most of the people clicking on these ads are not going to be in that category.

They might fall for the same scam, though, and if it’s been demonstrated to work on the big boys, it will probably work on grandma too.

Re:Am I a bad person

By thegarbz • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Crypto Bros and AI Bros are not sitting around on Reddit. If you’re talking joy in ordinary people being scammed then yes you probably are a bad person.

Seeing ads

By ArchieBunker • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

This is slashdot. Who here isn’t using any form of ad blocking?

Re:Seeing ads

By Himmy32 • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
People who should be thanked for their service in keeping my web browsing experience free.

Donald Trump, Bernie Sanders And Sam Altman Are All Talking About Public Ownership In AI

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot
U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders announced a plan for the public to take a 50% ownership stake in AI companies, remembers the Associated Press.

And then OpenAI’s Sam Altman “told Sanders that he, too, wants the public to have equity in AI companies.”
Though the CEO said he couldn’t support Sanders’ threshold of 50%, he nonetheless wanted to work with him to advocate for the general idea, according to people with knowledge of the conversation. The nearly hourlong meeting in Sanders’ Senate office this week, held at Altman’s request, highlighted the inherent tension between AI powerhouses and policymakers as Americans are increasingly asked to accept the costs of the AI boom even as they remain unconvinced of its direct benefits.

Yet it’s also creating odd political bedfellows fueled by populism as politicians from Sanders to President Donald Trump embrace giving the public a stake in AI’s growth. Speaking to reporters on Air Force One on Friday, Trump described a potential partnership “where the American people can benefit from the success of AI” and said executives from leading AI companies will visit the White House, “probably next week,” to discuss the idea.
The article points out that Altman also met with congressional leaders from both of America’s political parties.

Ah yes…

By Junta • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Altman wants some public ownership, but not 50% which, presuming it would be a voting stake, would actually potentially matter for decision making. It’s not a majority but if enough private market shareholders side with the public ownership, then it matters.

Instead, he wants enough for the public to have a stake specifically in the “approved” AI companies so that the companies are unambiguously “too big to fail”. A chance to hold hostage a big enough chunk of wealth so that the government is stuck doing whatever it can to protect and ensure the selected companies, whether it be in the face of a souring market or upstart companies that didn’t have the good fortune of being selected by the company. Meanwhile, the actual governance and decision making remain firmly status quo. Including decisions about how much to send back to “investors” and how much to “reinvest” (including setting their own compensation). They may even structure it so they can classify public ownership differently from private market, and reward investors in each class differently.

Just another ambition to privatize the gains and socialize the losses.

Not really. Reality is …

By aglider • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Sam Altman is talking about his business.
Bernie Sanders is talking about how stopping that business harming people.
Donald Trump is talking.

The AI Get-Out-of-Bankruptcy Card

By gtall • Score: 5, Informative Thread

When in doubt, off load to the government. It isn’t beyond the realm that el Bunko has done a secret deal with OpenAI for “some” federal control in exchange for a bit of dosh under the table. In fact, given his track record and Altman’s ability to be ethically challenged, it is likely. And given that he’ll be gone in 2.5 years of the remaining sentence in Hell we have of that dolt, he’ll collect now and stick the next administration with the screw up. And it will screw up, that’s what he does. Just look at his business record. He was found guilty in NY for financial fraud. It is who he is.

Sanders is angling for tax gains to help replace the taxes el Bunko has reduced on the wealthy.

Re:Obviously, Altman wants this

By geekmux • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

He knows he is due for a catastrophic business failure quite soon. Being partially publicly owned would give him access to taxpayer money…

You mean Too Big To Fail money.

Let’s call it what it is.

And if we thought American auto manufacturing arrogance was a bit Too Big to deal with before, just wait until Seven companies insist they’re far too Magnificent to Fail..

Re:Not really. Reality is …

By hodet • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Ya Altman and Sanders are talking about two different things entirely. Altman wants taxpayer money to support the company and take on the risk, Sanders wants guardrails. The title makes it sound like some big koombaya moment. Trump just trying to figure out how he can make it benefit him personally.