Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Sixteen AI Agents Built a C Compiler From Scratch
  2. Romance Publishing Has an AI Problem and Most Readers Don’t Know It Yet
  3. Autodesk Takes Google To Court Over AI Movie Software Named ‘Flow’
  4. Google Lines Up 100-Year Sterling Bond Sale
  5. Discord Will Require a Face Scan or ID for Full Access Next Month
  6. AI Gold Rush is Resurrecting China’s Infamous 72-hour Work Week - in US
  7. Age Bias is Still the Default at Work But the Data is Turning
  8. New Raspberry Pi 4 Model Splits RAM Across Dual Chips
  9. SpaceX Prioritizes Lunar ‘Self-Growing City’ Over Mars Project, Musk Says
  10. National Football League Launches Challenge to Improve Facemasks and Reduce Concussions
  11. Carmakers Rush To Remove Chinese Code Under New US Rules
  12. Amazon Delivery Drone Crashes into Texas Apartment Building
  13. Do Super Bowl Ads For AI Signal a Bubble About to Burst?
  14. Dave Farber Dies at Age 91
  15. After Six Years, Two Pentesters Arrested in Iowa Receive $600,000 Settlement

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Sixteen AI Agents Built a C Compiler From Scratch

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
Anthropic researcher Nicholas Carlini set 16 instances of Claude Opus 4.6 loose on a shared codebase over two weeks to build a C compiler from scratch, and the AI agents produced a 100,000-line Rust-based compiler capable of building a bootable Linux 6.9 kernel on x86, ARM and RISC-V architectures.

The project ran through nearly 2,000 Claude Code sessions and cost about $20,000 in API fees. Each instance operated inside its own Docker container, independently claiming tasks via lock files and pushing completed code to a shared Git repository. No orchestration agent directed traffic. The compiler achieved a 99% pass rate on the GCC torture test suite and can compile major open source projects including PostgreSQL, SQLite, Redis, FFmpeg and Doom. But it lacks a 16-bit x86 backend and calls out to GCC for that step, its assembler and linker remain buggy, and it produces less efficient code than GCC running with all optimizations disabled.

Carlini also invested significant effort building test harnesses and feedback systems to keep the agents productive, and the model hit a practical ceiling at around 100,000 lines as bug fixes and new features frequently broke existing functionality.

Romance Publishing Has an AI Problem and Most Readers Don’t Know It Yet

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
The romance genre — long the publishing industry’s earliest adopter of technological shifts, from e-books to self-publishing to serial releases — has become the front line for AI-generated fiction, and the results as you can imagine are messy. Coral Hart, a Cape Town-based novelist previously published by Harlequin and Mills & Boon, produced more than 200 AI-assisted romance novels last year and self-published them on Amazon, where they collectively sold around 50,000 copies. She found Anthropic’s Claude delivered the most elegant prose but was terrible at sexy banter; other programs like Grok and NovelAI wrote graphic scenes that felt rushed and mechanical. Chatbots struggled broadly to build the slow-burn sexual tension romance readers crave, she said.

A BookBub survey of more than 1,200 authors found roughly a third were using generative AI for plotting, outlining, or writing, and the majority did not disclose this to readers. Romance accounts for more than 20% of all adult fiction print sales, according to Circana BookScan, and the genre’s reliance on familiar tropes and narrative formulas makes it especially susceptible to AI disruption.

As she suggestively removed her right arm…

By jfdavis668 • Score: 5, Funny Thread
He caressed her third foot just above the knee…

Re:Read the human shit first. Then judge.

By 0123456 • Score: 5, Informative Thread

> Find the men writing romance novels.

There are a few because it’s a profitable market. They tend to identify as women though because women typically don’t want to read romance novels written by men.

Re: As she suggestively removed her right arm…

By devslash0 • Score: 4, Funny Thread

He looked for a free I/O port but they’ve all been already taken.

Autodesk Takes Google To Court Over AI Movie Software Named ‘Flow’

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
Autodesk has sued Google in San Francisco federal court, alleging the search giant infringed its “Flow” trademark by launching competing AI-powered software for movie, TV and video game production in May 2025.

Autodesk says it has used the Flow name since September 2022 and that Google assured it would not commercialize a product under the same name — then filed a trademark application in Tonga, where filings are not publicly accessible, before seeking U.S. protection.

Logical

By ZERO1ZERO • Score: 3 Thread
> Google assured it would not commercialize a product under the same name — then filed a trademark application in Tonga

I guess a trademark beats ‘assurance’ ?

Re:Logical

By dgatwood • Score: 4, Informative Thread

> Google assured it would not commercialize a product under the same name — then filed a trademark application in Tonga

I guess a trademark beats ‘assurance’ ?

That summary was gibberish, probably because the original article was hard to understand. But if I understand it correctly, the article appeared to say that Google used the phrase “Google Flow” as a product name in 2025, and assured Autodesk that they would never change it to just “Flow” (without the “Google” part), then dropped the “Google” and applied for a trademark — first in Tonga, then in the U.S.

It took a fair amount of effort to extract that detail from the article, and unless I missed something subtle, the article didn’t clearly specify whether Autodesk’s trademark is on “Flow” or “Autodesk Flow”, nor whether Google’s trademark is on “Flow” or “Google Flow”. I guess folks could do the trademark search if they’re curious, but I would have expected those details to be much more clearly spelled out in the article.

As for me, I just wanted to understand why Autodesk asked Google for assurance that they would not commercialize a product called “Flow” if Google had not already released such a product. The “Google Flow” versus “Flow” detail was critical to understanding the summary, and should have been right up at the top of the article, too, but instead was buried in a quote from Autodesk’s lawyers. My guess is that the original article’s authors didn’t fully understand the lawyers’ claim, and as a result, the article was just one editor quote trim away from making no sense at all.

My newswriting prof would have run away screaming.

Amiga Flow

By lazarus • Score: 3 Thread

I own the intellectual property for the software by the name of Amiga Flow from the ‘80s. So both party’s argument about prior art or use can get stuffed.

You can find the source code to Amiga Flow here.

Wankers.

Google Lines Up 100-Year Sterling Bond Sale

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
Alphabet has lined up banks to sell a rare 100-year bond, stepping up a borrowing spree by Big Tech companies racing to fund their vast investments in AI this year. From a report:
The so-called century bond will form part of a debut sterling issuance this week by Google’s parent company, according to people familiar with the matter. Alphabet was also selling $15bn of dollar bonds on Monday and lining up a Swiss franc bond sale, the people said.

Century bonds — long-term borrowing at its most extreme — are highly unusual, although a flurry were sold during the period of very low interest rates that followed the financial crisis, including by governments such as Austria and Argentina. The University of Oxford, EDF and the Wellcome Trust — the most recent in 2018 — are the only issuers to have previously tapped the sterling century market.

Such sales are even rarer in the tech sector, with most of the industry’s biggest groups issuing up to 40 years, although IBM sold a 100-year bond back in 1996. Big Tech companies and their suppliers are expected to invest almost $700bn in AI infrastructure this year and are increasingly turning to the debt markets to finance the giant data centre build-out.
Michael Burry, writing on Substack:
Alphabet looking to issue a 100-year bond. Last time this happened in tech was Motorola in 1997, which was the last year Motorola was considered a big deal.

At the start of 1997, Motorola was a top 25 market cap and top 25 revenue corporation in America. Never again. The Motorola corporate brand in 1997 was ranked #1 in the US, ahead of Microsoft. In 1998, Nokia overtook Motorola in cell phones, and after the iPhone it fell out of the consumer eye. Today Motorola is the 232nd largest market cap with only $11 billion in sales.

Here goes the bubble

By whitroth • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

They’re desperate for loans that they won’t have to pay back.

The Alphabet Guarantee

By gtall • Score: 3 Thread

Yep, Alphabet will be around in 100 years, yes? You have to be smoking pretty good weed to believe that.

Good luck for the grandkids

By nospam007 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Several US “100-year” style bonds did go bust, usually because the issuer collapsed long before the century was up.

The pattern is boringly consistent: railroads, municipalities, and a few grand infrastructure dreams that assumed the future would politely cooperate.

The classic failures were railroad bonds in the late 19th and early 20th century.

Railroads loved ultra-long maturities because they matched the lifespan of tracks and bridges.

Investors loved them because “America is growing forever”.

Many of those companies did not.

When railroads went bankrupt, bondholders were wiped out or forced into deep restructurings decades before maturity.
The bonds did not reach year 100, they died with the issuer.

Municipal century bonds also failed. Cities like Detroit issued very long-dated bonds in the early 1900s. Detroit’s 2013 bankruptcy showed the flaw in the idea that cities are immortal.
Holders of long-dated Detroit paper took severe haircuts.
Again, the bonds existed on paper, but the promise of 100 years was fiction.

Public utility bonds failed too.
Electric, gas, and water companies issued ultra-long bonds assuming stable monopolies.
When regulation changed, companies collapsed or were reorganised, and the bonds defaulted or were converted at a loss.

The lesson history teaches very clearly is that a 100-year bond is not about maturity, it is a bet on institutional survival.

In the US, corporations and cities routinely die before a century passes.

Governments with monetary sovereignty USUALLY don’t but there ARE exceptions.

Imperial Russia, bonds repudiated after the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution, investors got nothing despite full monetary sovereignty before collapse.

Germany, Weimar-era hyperinflation destroyed bond value after WWI, later Reich debt was restructured or written down after WWII.

Austria-Hungary, imperial sovereign bonds died with the empire in 1918, successor states refused to honour joint debt.

China, imperial and republican bonds were repudiated after 1949 by the PRC, continuity of the state was rejected.

Argentina, repeated sovereign defaults and restructurings since 2001 show monetary sovereignty does not prevent long-dated bond losses.

Re: The Alphabet Guarantee

By reanjr • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Bonds have priority in liquidation. It doesn’t matter if Google is still here. The first people to get paid if things go south are the bond holders, not the stock holders.

Re: The Alphabet Guarantee

By Waffle Iron • Score: 4, Funny Thread

At liquidation, each bond holder will receive one obsolete Nvidia GPU for every $1,000 in bond face value.

Discord Will Require a Face Scan or ID for Full Access Next Month

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
Discord said today it’s rolling out age verification on its platform globally starting next month, when it will automatically set all users’ accounts to a “teen-appropriate” experience unless they demonstrate that they’re adults. From a report:
Users who aren’t verified as adults will not be able to access age-restricted servers and channels, won’t be able to speak in Discord’s livestream-like “stage” channels, and will see content filters for any content Discord detects as graphic or sensitive. They will also get warning prompts for friend requests from potentially unfamiliar users, and DMs from unfamiliar users will be automatically filtered into a separate inbox.

[…] A government ID might still be required for age verification in its global rollout. According to Discord, to remove the new “teen-by-default” changes and limitations, “users can choose to use facial age estimation or submit a form of identification to [Discord’s] vendor partners, with more options coming in the future.” The first option uses AI to analyze a user’s video selfie, which Discord says never leaves the user’s device. If the age group estimate (teen or adult) from the selfie is incorrect, users can appeal it or verify with a photo of an identity document instead. That document will be verified by a third party vendor, but Discord says the images of those documents “are deleted quickly — in most cases, immediately after age confirmation.”

Discord data breach October 2020

By Lvdata • Score: 5, Informative Thread
They had a data breach of ID scans. Their “answer” is corporate enshittifaction ( https://discord.com/press-rele… ) Do we want to trust them AGAIN?!

No thanks

By TwistedGreen • Score: 5, Funny Thread

I guess it’s back to IRC

Re:Why do they do this

By eepok • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

To mitigate tort liability and preserve financial partnerships.

Re:Why do they do this

By sinij • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
They want to collect your personally identifying data so they can share it with governments looking to clamp down on dissenters. That is, Discord is a willing participant in implementing turn key authoritarianism.

Re:My church youth group is moving off Discord…

By cmseagle • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

What’s your church group posting about that it’s likely to be flagged as an age-restricted community??

In all seriousness, my guess would be that this makes Discord more appealing to groups like you describe. If Discord ends up with the reputation of a place where kids can get access all sorts of inappropriate content, I imagine parents being skeptical of letting their kids make an account at all. With age restrictions/verification in place some of those fears may be mitigated (even with all the typical caveats that it may turn out to be ineffective security theater).

AI Gold Rush is Resurrecting China’s Infamous 72-hour Work Week - in US

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
The AI boom has revived a workplace philosophy that China’s own regulators cracked down on years ago: the 72-hour work week, known as 996 for its 9am-to-9pm, six-days-a-week cadence. US startups flush with venture capital are now openly advertising it as a feature, not a bug. Rilla, a New York-based AI company that monitors sales reps in the field, warns applicants on its careers page to expect roughly 70-hour weeks. Browser-Use, a seven-person startup building tools for AI-to-browser interaction, operates out of a shared “hacker house” where the line between living and working barely exists.

In a market where dozens of startups are racing to ship similar AI products, founders believe longer hours buy them a competitive edge. But the research disagrees. A WHO and ILO analysis tied 55-plus-hour weeks to 745,000 deaths from stroke and heart disease globally in 2016 alone. Michigan State University found that an employee working 70 hours produces nearly the same output as one working 50.

Nonsense

By Errol backfiring • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

founders believe longer hours buy them a competitive edge.

This is such nonsense. Overtime works for incidental cases, not structurally. If you work one or two days overtime, it might help with completing a job that could otherwise not be done. After that, the productivity falls back to normal due to fatigue creeping in. After a week, a 70 our week is as productive as a 40 hour one, at best.

There is also a big difference between the workday

By Hasaf • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Something I always had trouble adapting to, when I lived in China, was the long lunch. It is normal for the Chinese to take a three-hour lunch. This allows time to eat and socialise and, quite importantly, to take a long nap.

It is viewed as improper, even for a workplace supervisor, to interfere with the nap time.

Sweatshop

By bradley13 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I’ve worked, at least tangentially, with IT folk from various cultures. The 996 is for sweatshop work. I remember one place where people sat at their desks entering code, or whatever. Walking around behind them was the boss, who would go from person to person, telling them *exactly* what to do. All the way down to telling one person to put a CD back into its case. The people were barely even code monkeys - more like typists. Probably you can do that 996 without losing productivity. No idea how the boss functioned. Maybe he swapped out with someone else?

When I was studying for my first master’s degree, there was a brief time where I had coursework as well as my thesis. To get everything done, I worked highly structured 80 hour weeks. That was only possible, because it was only for a few weeks - there was an end in sight. That sort of schedule cannot be maintained. Anyone who thinks it can be is spending a lot of time staring into space / talking at the water cooler / something else non-productive.

Re:a 7-man AI startup works long hours

By grahamsz • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
> Now would I want to do this for salary and long term, no....but often that old saying “make hay while the sun is shining " is apt advice!!

Yeah I’d have jumped at that when i was younger. If there was a chance to pull in several times my then-salary (+stock options i presume) by working double the hours then I’d totally do it. Honestly at 45 I’d probably still do it for a year for triple my current salary - that’d be enough to pay off my mortgage.

I have my doubts about the efficiency of it all - in the rare instances where I’ve put in a 70 hour week I notice the precipitous drop in my productivity much about 50, but as the employee that wouldn’t be my problem.

Re:Who the fuck wants an engineer after 40h?

By Tablizer • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Ask these same people if they would get into a cab if they knew the driver were on their 69th hour that week.

Age Bias is Still the Default at Work But the Data is Turning

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
A mounting body of research is making it harder for companies to justify what most of them still do — push experienced workers out the door just as they’re hitting their professional peak. A 2025 study published in the journal Intelligence analyzed 16 cognitive, emotional and personality dimensions and found that while processing speed declines after early adulthood, other capabilities — including the ability to avoid distractions and accumulated knowledge — continue to improve, putting peak overall functioning between ages 55 and 60.

AARP and OECD data back this up at the firm level: a 10-percentage-point increase in workers above 50 correlates with roughly 1.1% higher productivity. A 2022 Boston Consulting Group study found cross-generational teams outperform homogeneous ones. UK retailer B&Q staffed a store largely with older workers in 1989 and saw profits rise 18%. BMW implemented 70 ergonomic changes at a German plant in 2007 and recorded a 7% productivity gain. Yet an Urban Institute analysis of U.S. data from 1992 to 2016 found more than half of workers above 50 were pushed out of long-held jobs before they chose to retire.

Running into this right now, sort of

By jfdavis668 • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
I am at the point I’m about to retire. At work, I keep having to remind people of this. I’m the one who has built up the knowledge base, and everyone comes to when they need something. I understand how all the parts work together, while most are focused on the piece they work on. I am constantly reminding upper management that I need to train people. People keep coming and going, learn then leave. And no one reads documentation, so that’s not an option. Their all good people, and I’m sure they will handle it when I’m gone. We are constantly working on modernizing, which is great! Just need to make sure that they don’t forget important parts.

Re:Running into this right now, sort of

By jfdavis668 • Score: 5, Funny Thread
I’ll record everything in 15-60 second clips and host it on TikTok. That or build it in Minecraft. Make them dig to locate the information!

Why worry about it

By Viol8 • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Once you leave it won’t be your problem if management have been short sighted with the training and the company tanks. Most people don’t stay at companies more than a few years now anyway as its been demonstrated many times in the last decade or so that people are norhing more than “resources” like paperclips to most companies, to be disposed off when profits dip.

Age Bias is Still the Default at Work But ARE Data

By tigerstyle • Score: 3, Funny Thread
showing my age by correcting grammar. you damn kids! get off my lawn!

Re:Running into this right now, sort of

By cayenne8 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I am at the point I’m about to retire. At work, I keep having to remind people of this. I’m the one who has built up the knowledge base, and everyone comes to when they need something. I understand how all the parts work together, while most are focused on the piece they work on. I am constantly reminding upper management that I need to train people. People keep coming and going, learn then leave. And no one reads documentation, so that’s not an option. They’re all good people, and I’m sure they will handle it when I’m gone. We are constantly working on modernizing, which is great! Just need to make sure that they don’t forget important parts.

A bit of unsolicited suggestion…

Start now and incorporate yourself. LLC or as I prefer a S-Corp.

Then when you retire, and they inevitably get lost and try to contact you…be ready to consult back to them 1099 at a few hundred dollars and hour bill rate.

This way, you’ll get some good pocket money, they won’t go down the drain AND if the bill rate is high enough they won’t bother you for piddly shit....

Just a thought.....

New Raspberry Pi 4 Model Splits RAM Across Dual Chips

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
The blog OMG Ubuntu reports that a new version of the Raspberry Pi 4 Model B has been (quietly) introduced. “The key difference? It now uses a dual-RAM configuration.”
The Raspberry Pi 4 Model B (PCB 13a) adopts a dual-RAM configuration to ‘improve supply chain flexibility’ and manufacturing efficiency, per a company product change notice document. Earlier versions of the Raspberry Pi 4 use a single RAM chip on the top of the board. The new revision adds a second LPDDR4 chip to the underside, with a couple of passive components also moved over… In moving to a dual-chip layout, Raspberry Pi can combine two smaller — and marginally cheaper — modules to hit the same RAM totals amidst fluctuating component costs…

This change will not impact performance (for better or worse). The Broadcom BCM2711 SoC has a 32-bit wide memory interface so the bandwidth stays identical; this is not doubling the memory bus, it’s just a physical split, not a logical one. Plus, the new board is fully compatible with existing official accessories, HATs and add-ons. All operating systems that support the Pi 4 will work, but as the memory setup is different a new version of the boot-loader will need to be flashed first.

Re:RAM recycling?

By Comboman • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Recycling was a lot easier when RAM was on SIMMs and DIMMS (and socketed DIPs for the old-timers).

Re:There is much better hardware anyways

By thegarbz • Score: 4 Thread

“Better” requires you to define your requirements. All Orange Pi models come at a considerable price disadvantage compared to RPis. So already it is a failure for the requirements of many people, those who already consider the RPi 4 to be too expensive.

Please stop suggesting solutions to people without even asking what the problem is.

As to your complaints, there’s been one major screwup and that was the power design on the original Pi. Everything else is a tradeoff. The original RPi had a perfectly find USB interface for many of the applications it was designed for, and certainly had a perfectly fine USB interface given the cost of the device. If it doesn’t suit your needs and you bought it, then you are the person who has no clue. Next time spend more and buy a device commensurate with your project requirements.

There’s a reason the RPi was a success despite your assertion that the people don’t understand hardware (and it’s easy to be a criticising arse of a keyboard warrior when you never tried designing such a system yourself)

Re: My ZX Spectrum had 4 memory banks

By Koen Lefever • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

I wonder if anyone made a magnetic core memory module for the Pi?

Core memory for the Raspberry Pi Pico.

SODIMM

By ledow • Score: 3 Thread

Just give us a SODIMM slot already.

SpaceX Prioritizes Lunar ‘Self-Growing City’ Over Mars Project, Musk Says

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“Elon Musk said on Sunday that SpaceX has shifted its focus to building a ‘self-growing city’ on the moon,” reports Reuters, “which could be achieved in less than 10 years.”
SpaceX still intends to start on Musk’s long-held ambition of a city on Mars within five to seven years, he wrote on his X social media platform, “but the overriding priority is securing the future of civilization and the Moon is faster.”

Musk’s comments echo a Wall Street Journal report on Friday, stating that SpaceX has told investors it would prioritize going to the moon and attempt a trip to Mars at a later time, targeting March 2027 for an uncrewed lunar landing. As recently as last year, Musk said that he aimed to send an uncrewed mission to Mars by the end of 2026.

Idiocrat

By Aighearach • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

It wouldn’t work for “securing the future of civilization,” even if they were able to overcome the mountain of difficult and expensive engineering challenges.

Any sort of calamity that put human life on Earth in peril would mean the lunar colony would stop receiving support from Earth and would die off long before the last holdouts Earthside.

There’s an incredibly long list of things they’d need shipped up to survive, none of which are needed on Earth. Because on Earth you can survive by primitive means if necessary.

Re:Make that 50 years or longer

By AmiMoJo • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Musk has been making bad predictions for decades now. Boots on Mars in 10 years, about 15 years ago now. Full self driving in 6 months, a decade ago. Starship was supposed to be flying regular missions by now, the new Roadster should have been delivered years ago (with booster rockets, according to Elon).

Re: Make that 50 years or longer

By Dishevel • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Snake oil? Paypal set a standard. (Sucks now) Tesla changed how people thought about electric cars, SpaceX revolutionized space travel and reduced costs an incredible amount. Starlink is pumping internet connectivity to the entire world at affordable rates. His, “Snake Oil” has done more good for the world than your entire family tree ever will.

Re: Make that 50 years or longer

By SuperDre • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
I don’t see you being a billionaire.. And most of his projects are actually moneymaking. Cybertruck isn’t a fail, but it aldo isn’t a grand success. That’s the problem with Musk haters, they keep saying the same crap over and over, not even looking into if what they say is actually true. Musk is a dreamer, he has visions and wants to pursue those dreams, and yeah, he is a lot of times too optimistic, but in the end his drive gets the companies there. And he might not officially be an engineer (as he hasn’t the papers), he actually is involved in many of the engineering tasks and ideas, he’s not just a salesman.

Re:Idiocrat

By Rei • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Iron, oxygen and water are not hard things to acquire at the moon’s poles. It’s like you were trying to make a list of the things that are easiest to acquire on the moon.

Your biggest problems will be the extreme paucity of both nitrogen and carbon, things essential en masse for all life. Beyond that, chlorine and fluorine are also very rare, zinc is about 2 orders of magnitude less common than on Earth (also lead, bismuth, thallium and cadmium), etc. Also, beyond general abundances, is the lack of many of the sort of enrichment processes that create rich mining deposits on Earth. At best you’ll get some of the volcanic enrichment processes (incompatible elements in pegmatites), but not much beyond that, and even then you’re going to deal with lots of overburden. And hard rock mining and processing on the moon will be far more difficult than on Earth.

But iron, water, and oxygen are basically the easiest things you could get on the moon. Respectively, half a percent of regolith is (magnetic) iron dust; water, while rare globally, is seemingly abundant in polar craters; and oxygen can not only be made from water, but over 40% of the mass of lunar regolith itself is oxygen, which can be freed via a variety of (albeit energy-intensive) processes.

(Even “getting the minerals” isn’t really the big challenge anyway in gaining full independence from Earth. It’s the mind-bogglingly immense length of production chains needed to fully sustain even a minimized-set of required technologies (“consumables”, both feedstocks and maintenance), and all of the transport along the way. You can whittle down how much you need to import per-capita by orders of magnitude, but getting rid of all of it is a big ask)

National Football League Launches Challenge to Improve Facemasks and Reduce Concussions

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
As Super Bowl Sunday comes to a close, America’s National Football League “is challenging innovators to improve the facemask on football helmets to reduce concussions in the game,” reports the Associated Press:
The league announced on Friday at an innovation summit for the Super Bowl the next round in the HealthTECH Challenge series, a crowdsourced competition designed to accelerate the development of cutting-edge football helmets and new standards for player safety. The challenge invites inventors, engineers, startups, academic teams and established companies to improve the impact protection and design of football helmets through improvements to how facemasks absorb and reduce the effects of contact on the field…

Most progress on helmet safety has come from improvements to the shell and padding, helping to reduce the overall rate of concussions. Working with the helmet industry, the league has brought in position-specific helmets, with those for quarterbacks, for example, having more padding in the back after data showed most concussions for QBs came when the back of the head slammed to the turf. But the facemask has mostly remained the same. This past season, 44% of in-game concussions resulted from impact to the player’s facemask, up from 29% in 2015, according to data gathered by the NFL. “What we haven’t seen over that period of time are any changes of any note to the facemask,” [said Jeff Miller, the NFL’s executive vice president overseeing player health and safety]… “Now we see, given the changes in our concussion numbers and injuries to players, that as changes are made to the helmet, fewer and fewer concussions are caused by hits to the shell, and more and more concussions as a percentage are by hits to the facemask…”

Selected winners will receive up to $100,000 in aggregate funding, as well as expert development support to help move their concepts from the lab to the playing field.
Winners will be announced in August, according to the article, “and Miller said he expected helmet manufacturers to start implementing any improvements into helmets soon after that.”

Right, right.

By fuzzyfuzzyfungus • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
The NFL has been pretending to care about concussions more or less as long as I can remember; and I’m north of 40 at this point. I suppose it’s marginally less pathetic than their “no, of course constant head trauma has no neurological effect whatsoever” stance; but it’s still desperately hard to take seriously.

How about disincentives to injure other players

By tdelaney • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

There are lots of games that use an oval ball and don’t wear helmets. All of those have made major moves over the last decades to reduce the likelihood of concussions by making certain moves illegal in the game, with significant penalties. Spear tackles, grabbing around the neck, dumping people head first, slamming the back of the head into the turf, etc.

So why doesn’t American football do the same? Penalties can be percentage of salary, reduction of team salary caps, etc to take into account the ridiculous money involved esp. with some players.

Going in the wrong direction

By battingly • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

If you want to reduce concussions, eliminate helmets. All that has been accomplished with helmet improvements is players use their heads increasingly as battering rams.

Re:Maybe change the rules also?

By Luckyo • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

If I remember history of this one correctly, American Football didn’t originally have the current head banging style of play, because helmets were initially not used at all, and when they came, they were primitive.

As protective gear got better, it led to goal oriented to athletes aimed at winning to play in ways that new protective gear enables them to play. I.e. better helmets = more banging heads together.

The one thing that will work is rule change. But rule changes always carry a risk of losing a lot of audience that will find the game after rule change to be too boring to watch.

And ultimately, top tier sports are all about what spectators want. Athletes at that level are ultimately selling a service.

Re:Right, right.

By phantomfive • Score: 4, Informative Thread
The NFL has made major rule changes over the years to avoid concussions.

For example, here are the rule changes that show proper tackling technique of the QB. I think even a non-player can tell the difference.

Carmakers Rush To Remove Chinese Code Under New US Rules

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“How Chinese is your car?” asks the Wall Street Journal. “Automakers are racing to work it out.”
Modern cars are packed with internet-connected widgets, many of them containing Chinese technology. Now, the car industry is scrambling to root out that tech ahead of a looming deadline, a test case for America’s ability to decouple from Chinese supply chains. New U.S. rules will soon ban Chinese software in vehicle systems that connect to the cloud, part of an effort to prevent cameras, microphones and GPS tracking in cars from being exploited by foreign adversaries.

The move is “one of the most consequential and complex auto regulations in decades,” according to Hilary Cain, head of policy at trade group the Alliance for Automotive Innovation. “It requires a deep examination of supply chains and aggressive compliance timelines.”

Carmakers will need to attest to the U.S. government that, as of March 17, core elements of their products don’t contain code that was written in China or by a Chinese company. The rule also covers software for advanced autonomous driving and will be extended to connectivity hardware starting in 2029. Connected cars made by Chinese or China-controlled companies are also banned, wherever their software comes from…

The Commerce Department’s Bureau of Industry and Security, which introduced the connected-vehicle rule, is also allowing the use of Chinese code that is transferred to a non-Chinese entity before March 17. That carve-out has sparked a rush of corporate restructuring, according to Matt Wyckhouse, chief executive of cybersecurity firm Finite State. Global suppliers are relocating China-based software teams, while Chinese companies are seeking new owners for operations in the West.
Thanks to long-time Slashdot reader schwit1 for sharing the article.

Re:Corrected title

By djinn6 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Sooner or later we’ll have geopolitically aligned software. The Israeli pager attack showed how dangerous it is to not have a friendly superpower produce your electronics. The same problem exists in software, perhaps to an even greater degree.

In that world I expect open source to win, because that’s the only way to create trustworthy software while avoiding doing a huge amount of duplicate work.

The chinese aren’t the problem

By cshark • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Our government is the problem.
They’re well beyond what they’re allowed to do at this point in terms of surveillance, and the law doesn’t protect people like it should.
Cars shouldn’t be building psychometric profiles on you and selling them to everyone and anyone who wants to know how often you’ve used your drink holder.

The adversaries to personal freedom here are local.

Re:The chinese aren’t the problem

By AmiMoJo • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

You can expect the quality of these cars to drop rapidly as tested, debugged software is replaced by hastily lashed together vibe coded crap.

Maybe that’s the point. Easier for the US government to hack it.

Re:Corrected title

By ArchieBunker • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

And how many masked men did Obama deputize? How many American citizens did these masked men murder under Obama? Zero.

Re:Corrected title

By thegarbz • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

You know Obama deported more people, then Trump…right?

No one is complaining about the number of deportations. They are complaining about the *method* of deportations.

To equate Obama’s deportations with Trumps where multiple constitutional guarantees are violated and American citizens have been executed summarily in the street makes you a truly despicable piece of shit. I’m only sad that you’re not being deported in lieu of the immigrants contributing to actually making American great rather than your efforts of simply tearing the country down with bullshit partisan politics.

Amazon Delivery Drone Crashes into Texas Apartment Building

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“You can hear the hum of the drone,” says a local newscaster, “but then the propellors come into contact with the building, chunks of the drone later seen falling down. The next video shows the drone on the ground, surrounded by smoke…

“Amazon tells us there was minimal damage to the apartment building, adding they are working with the appropriate people to handle any repairs.” But there were people standing outside, notes the woman who filmed the crash, and the falling drone “could’ve hit them, and they would’ve hurt.”

More from USA Today:
Cesarina Johnson, who captured the collision from her window, told USA TODAY that the collision seemed to happen “almost immediately” after she began to record the drone in action… “The propellers on the thing were still moving, and you could smell it was starting to burn,” Johnson told Fox 4 News. “And you see a few sparks in one of my videos. Luckily, nothing really caught on fire where it got, it escalated really crazy.” According to the outlet, firefighters were called out of an abundance of caution, but the “drone never caught fire....”

Amazon employees can be seen surveying the scene in the clip. Johnson told the outlet that firefighters and Amazon workers worked together to clean up before the drone was loaded into a truck.
Another local news report points out Amazon only began drone delivery in the area late last year.

The San Antonio Express News points out that America’s Federal Aviation Administration "opened an investigation into Amazon’s drone delivery program in November after one of its drone struck an Internet cable line in Waco.”

Re:Amazon will pay out nothing you need to sue the

By nysus • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Just become a billionaire and you’ll be fine.

Re: Amazon will pay out nothing you need to sue th

By kenh • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Amazon is already working on the repairs to the building, that seems like the correct first step since no one was actually hurt in the incident… as for fines, OK, I’d love to hear the law/regulation that says when an autonomous drone hits a building, you have to pay a fine (or do jail time) - and no, if your personal drone hit a building and didn’t hurt anyone you wouldn’t go to jail, accidental damage to a building isn’t a criminal offense

Re: WTF?

By kenh • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Now if I had a drone flying around, for whatever the purpose, and crashed it into someone’s apartment building, I’m pretty sure that I’d be arrested and facing all matter of criminal charges. In fact, I could expect a raid by feds and I’d be looking down the barrel of an MP5.

No, you wouldn’t, accidental property damage without injury to a person is not a criminal offense.

Intentional property damage is a crime, but this was not intentional.

Bodily injury is a crime, but no one was hurt.

If you lose control of your car (accidentally) and hit someone’s home and do not cause bodily harm to anyone, you are responsible for the repairs, you aren’t charged with a criminal offense, you don’t go to jail, and your home will not be raided by federal agents.

Re:Guess what hurts more than getting hit by a dro

By thegarbz • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

I take it you’ve never been hit by a drone. A friend of mine has (his own). He spent 2 days in hospital and got a LOT of stitches. Especially drones designed to carry weight typically have very strong blades. I’m also reminded of the story we ran here a decade ago about a guy who killed himself while doing trick flights with his drone after it hit him in the face and nearly took his head right off. Bled out with a crowd watching.

This isn’t an either or situation. Drones haven’t replaced drivers. Amazon has record number of vehicles on the road.

Re: news priorities

By fluffernutter • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

The real problem flew right over your head (pun intended). Vehicles are at full peak use so what you see today is what you you get. Maybe one accident per billion packages delivered or whatever. The drones on the other hand are a growing technology. If there are hundreds in the air now there will be thousands one day. So it causes one to think.. if it happens today than it will happen at least ten times more once it gets fully ramped up. Perhaps people were lucky in escaping injury and damage this time but will they stay as lucky as this happens more and more?

Do Super Bowl Ads For AI Signal a Bubble About to Burst?

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
It’s the first “AI” Super Bowl, argues the tech/business writer at Slate, with AI company advertisements taking center stage, even while consumers insist to surveyors that they’re “mostly negative” about AI-generated ads.

Last year AI companies spent over $1.7 billion on AI-related ads, notes the Washington Post, adding the blitz this year will be “inescapable” — even while surveys show Americans “doubt the technology is good for them or the world…”

Slate wonders if that means history will repeat itself…
The sheer saturation of new A.I. gambits, added to the mismatch with consumer priorities, gives this year’s NFL showcase the sector-specific recession-indicator vibes that have defined Super Bowls of the past. 2022 was a pride-cometh-before-the-fall event for the cryptocurrency bubble, which collapsed in such spectacular fashion later that year — thanks largely to Super Bowl ad client Sam Bankman-Fried — that none of its major brands have ever returned to the broadcast. (… the coins themselves are once again crashing, hard.) Mortgage lender Ameriquest was as conspicuous a presence in the mid-2000s Super Bowls as it was an absence in the later aughts, having folded in 2007 when the risky subprime loans it specialized in helped kick off the financial crisis. And then there were all those bowl-game commercials for websites like Pets.com and Computer.com in 2000, when the dot-com rush brought attention to a slew of digital startups that went bust with the bubble.

Does this Super Bowl’s record-breaking A.I. ad splurge also portend a coming pop? Look at the business environment: The biggest names in the industry are swapping unimaginable stacks of cash exclusively with one another. One firm’s stock price depends on another firm’s projections, which depend on another contractor’s successes. Necessary infrastructure is meeting resistance, and all-around investment in these projects is riskier than ever. And yet, the sector is still willing to break the bank for the Super Bowl — even though, time and again, we’ve already seen how this particular game plays out.
People are using AI apps. And Meta has aired an ad where a man in rural New Mexico “says he landed a good job in his hometown at a Meta data center,” notes the Washington Post. “It’s interspersed with scenes from a rodeo and other folksy tropes, in one of . The TV commercial (and a similar one set in Iowa), aired in Washington, D.C., and a handful of other communities, suggesting it’s aimed at convincing U.S. elected officials that AI brings job opportunities.

But the Post argues the AI industry “is selling a vision of the future that Americans don’t like.” And they offer cite Allen Adamson, a brand strategist and co-founder of marketing firm Metaforce, who says the perennial question about advertising is whether it can fix bad vibes about a product.

“The answer since the dawn of marketing and advertising is no.”

Investment

By Himmy32 • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Super bowl ads always payoff…

Betteridge and hyperbole

By larryjoe • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

“Do Super Bowl Ads For AI Signal a Bubble About to Burst?”

Betteridge’s Law aside, is this question calling the 1984 Apple Mac ad a signal that a bubble is about to burst? Some Super Bowls ads are bubble busts, some are great successes, and most are in between.

Re:Does /. always looking for signs of AI failure

By high_rolla • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

If you look at the articles over the last few years you will see that no they haven’t. The types of articles showing up here seem to have followed a pattern similar to other new technologies (curved screens, 3D TV, VR) where it starts off with articles discussing the technology from a technical perspective, moves on to discussions speculating on potential growth and impacts on the wider community, starts moving onto financials of the companies involved and then moves on to decline in interest.

This is normal human behaviour. How many times have you gotten a new device (car, phone etc) and been really interested in some new feature. You initially use it quite a bit and are excited about it but then the novelty wares off and you start to use the feature less. You don’t necessarily stop using it but it doesn’t turn out to be this “game changing” thing as initially thought.

I believe that AI is going through a similar trajectory and the articles on here are really just reflecting that.

It doesn’t mean that AI is going to go completely bust, just that it has been overhyped and is now starting to fall back down to where it should naturally be. However people that have overinvested in the type are desperate to try and keep the hype going and will go all out in trying (which with hype, you have to really).

Just Lame Ads All Around

By Bobknobber • Score: 4, Informative Thread

This Super Bowl has had some of the lamest and lowest effort ads I have seen in two or so decades of the Super Bowl. The AI ads are just the hallucinated cherry on top.

That AI.com one in particular shilling Sam, Elon, and AGI in particular was just pure unadulterated cringe. Could they really not think of an actual ad, even if it was generated by AI?

Though the Ring one had some genuine dystopian vibes with their newest feature for finding lost dogs. Totally not selling surveillance as a service here.

Dave Farber Dies at Age 91

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
The mailing list for the North American Network Operators’ Group discusses Internet infrastructure issues like routing, IP address allocation, and containing malicious activity. This morning there was another message:
We are heartbroken to report that our colleague — our mentor, friend, and conscience — David J. Farber passed away suddenly at his home in Roppongi, Tokyo. He left us on Saturday, Feb. 7, 2026, at the too-young age of 91…

Dave’s career began with his education at Stevens Institute of Technology, which he loved deeply and served as a Trustee. He joined the legendary Bell Labs during its heyday, and worked at the Rand Corporation. Along the way, among countless other activities, he served as Chief Technologist of the U.S. Federal Communications Commission; became a proficient (instrument-rated) pilot; and was an active board member of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a digital civil-liberties organization.

His professional accomplishments and impact are almost endless, but often captured by one moniker: "grandfather of the Internet,” acknowledging the foundational contributions made by his many students at the University of California, Irvine; the University of Delaware; the University of Pennsylvania; and Carnegie Mellon University. In 2018, at the age of 83, Dave moved to Japan to become Distinguished Professor at Keio University and Co-Director of the Keio Cyber Civilization Research Center (CCRC). He loved teaching, and taught his final class on January 22, 2026… Dave thrived in Japan in every way…

It’s impossible to summarize a life and career as rich and long as Dave"s in our few words here. And each of us, even those who knew him for decades, represent just one facet of his life. But because we are here at its end, we have the sad duty of sharing this news.
Farber once said that " At both Bell Labs and Rand, I had the privilege, at a young age, of working with and learning from giants in our field. Truly I can say (as have others) that I have done good things because I stood on the shoulders of those giants. In particular, I owe much to Dr. Richard Hamming, Paul Baran and George Mealy.”

“Grandfather” checks out

By ihadafivedigituid • Score: 5, Informative Thread
Farber was Jon Postel’s PhD thesis adviser at UCLA, wow.

A Dave Farber story

By EditorDavid • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
In 2002 Slashdot reader #16,933 remembered asking Farber what he thought of claims that Al vice president Al Gore had invented the internet, “expecting to get a chuckle out of him, because he knew many of the people that might have actually been able to make that kind of claim.” He shared Farber’s response in a comment on.

“Instead, he got kind of serious, and said, ‘Well, no, he didn’t create the internet, and I think he’s been quoted out of context, but he was absolutely responsible for creating the legislative environment that allowed that type of research to be done, and lead to the creation of the internet.’"

Dave will be missed

By jplove • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Dave was a good guy, a kind person with a big heart, and someone who wanted the Internet to work well and benefit society. Dave’s interesting people email list was pretty influential at one point. Dave had a type of soft authority, that people paid attention to, because of his combination of technical knowledge, altruistic motives and common sense.

Dave’s students are a who’s who of the Internet

By Arrogant-Bastard • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
As are the students of his students. He was a brilliant man, and still razor-sharp at 91. He had a quiet way of speaking authoritatively, and anyone who listened to him for a while realized that he wasn’t just smart; he was wise. His grasp of the big picture and the long term in the context of the details and the now was amazing.

We have lost a giant. And I can only hope that everyone will take the time not just to pay their respects, but to read what he wrote, and listen to what he said, and to try to learn as much as they can from a man who made all this possible.

Easily my most memorable professor at Penn

By nategasser • Score: 3 Thread

I had a seminar class with Farber which was literally 10-12 of us sitting at his feet twice a week. It was fantastic.

One of his many stories I recall: He was in Japan in the early 80’s and found a “copy” of Lotus 1-2-3 in a store for something like $10 (retail was $500, $1500 in today’s dollars) and his traveling companion thought it was hilarious so they bought a copy. The companion was of course, Mitch Kapor.

After Six Years, Two Pentesters Arrested in Iowa Receive $600,000 Settlement

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot
“They were crouched down like turkeys peeking over the balcony,” the county sheriff told Ars Technica. A half hour past midnight, they were skulking through a courthouse in Iowa’s Dallas County on September 11 “carrying backpacks that remind me and several other deputies of maybe the pressure cooker bombs.” More deputies arrived…
Justin Wynn, 29 of Naples, Florida, and Gary De Mercurio, 43 of Seattle, slowly proceeded down the stairs with hands raised. They then presented the deputies with a letter that explained the intruders weren’t criminals but rather penetration testers who had been hired by Iowa’s State Court Administration to test the security of its court information system. After calling one or more of the state court officials listed in the letter, the deputies were satisfied the men were authorized to be in the building.
But Sheriff Chad Leonard had the men arrested on felony third-degree burglary charges (later reduced to misdemeanor trespassing charges). He told them that while the state government may have wanted to test security, “The State of Iowa has no authority to allow you to break into a county building. You’re going to jail.”

More than six years later, the Des Moines Register reports:
Dallas County is paying $600,000 to two men who sued after they were arrested in 2019 while testing courthouse security for Iowa’s Judicial Branch, their lawyer says.

Gary DeMercurio and Justin Wynn were arrested Sept. 11, 2019, after breaking into the Dallas County Courthouse. They spent about 20 hours in jail and were charged with burglary and possession of burglary tools, though the charges were later dropped. The men were employees of Colorado-based cybersecurity firm Coalfire Labs, with whom state judicial officials had contracted to perform an analysis of the state court system’s security. Judicial officials apologized and faced legislative scrutiny for how they had conducted the security test.

But even though the burglary charges against DeMercurio and Wynn were dropped, their attorney previously said having a felony arrest on their records made seeking employment difficult. Now the two men are to receive a total of $600,000 as a settlement for their lawsuit, which has been transferred between state and federal courts since they first filed it in July 2021 in Dallas County. The case had been scheduled to go to trial Monday, Jan. 26 until the parties notified the court Jan. 23 of the impending deal…

“The settlement confirms what we have said from the beginning: our work was authorized, professional, and done in the public interest,” DeMercurio said in a statement. “What happened to us never should have happened. Being arrested for doing the job we were hired to do turned our lives upside down and damaged reputations we spent years building....”

“This incident didn’t make anyone safer,” Wynn said. “It sent a chilling message to security professionals nationwide that helping government identify real vulnerabilities can lead to arrest, prosecution, and public disgrace. That undermines public safety, not enhances it.”
County Attorney Matt Schultz said dismissing the charges was the decision of his predecessor, according to the newspaper, and that he believed the sheriff did nothing wrong.

“I am putting the public on notice that if this situation arises again in the future, I will prosecute to the fullest extent of the law.”

Re:Prosecute what?

By coopertempleclause • Score: 5, Informative Thread
Worth noting that Sheriff is an elected position and has no obligation to even know the law, as Republican Chad Leonard definitely proved he didn’t.

Re: Prosecute what?

By TWX • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

And it’s actually more straightforward with courts. The systems for courts are regulated at the state level, even for county and municipal courts, at least in my state. That means pretty strict compliance with state-level rules and regulations and authorization by state-level officials for things like auditing and inspection. If a lower court fails to comply, that state entity can compel that lower level jurisdiction to install an entirely segregated computer network entirely air-gapped to the local entity’s LAN, meaning that court employees would have to shuttle data between their local org’s PC and the court PC, with the court PC connected to a court access switch and court firewalling router with a court private network link back to state resources. And historically they’ve been very behind the times, still using friggin’ T1 lines in the 2020s, where 1.544Mb will cost as much as a 10Gb metro ethernet circuit.

State courts allow local entities to have court PCs that can be on the local org’s network with connectivity back to court resources without that special air-gapped network only if the local org accepts auditing and building that connection out to specifications. Pen testing is not an unreasonable thing to do, and if it’s too easy to break into the building to gain access to PCs or network equipment and too easy to get onto the court’s network then there’s going to be a problem.

Re:Prosecute what?

By taustin • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Why in the holy fuck is a judicial position at all an elected one?

A) Sheriff isn’t a judicial position, it’s an executive position.

B) The county I lived in during high school in Missouri had an elected sheriff who was a convicted felon. He was allowed to be sheriff, even though he wasn’t allowed to carry a gun. (Very inbred area, he was literally related to enough of the voters to vote him into office in hopes that having a steady income would keep him from more hog rustling.)

It worked about as well as it sounds.

Re:jobs should not be allowed to look at arrest on

By markdavis • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I came to post the same thing:

>" their attorney previously said having a felony arrest on their records made seeking employment difficult.”

How is it that anyone should be allowed to see an ARREST record. You are presumed innocent and if found not guilty.... ESPECIALLY if the charges were dismissed… that should have no impact on your life. And if that kind of information can’t be secured properly, then it should be permanently DELETED.

County Attorney Matt Schultz real statement

By jsepeta • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

County Attorney Matt Schultz: “I refuse to learn any lesson from the false arrest and imprisonment of security professionals hired by the state of Iowa because I’m a shithead.”