Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Over 6,000 WordPress Hacked To Install Plugins Pushing Infostealers
  2. NASA Further Delays First Operational Starliner Flight
  3. Basecamp-Maker 37Signals Says Its ‘Cloud Exit’ Will Save It $10 Million Over 5 Years
  4. Amazon Ditches Plastic Air Pillows
  5. One-Third of DHS’s Border Surveillance Cameras Are Broken, Memo Says
  6. TikTok Owner Sacks Intern For Sabotaging AI Project
  7. T-Mobile, AT&T Oppose Unlocking Rule, Claim Locked Phones Are Good For Users
  8. Disney To Name Bob Iger’s Successor In Early 2026
  9. iFixit’s Meta Quest 3S Teardown Reveals a Quest 2 ‘Hiding Inside’
  10. ‘Blade Runner 2049’ Producer Sues Tesla, Warner Bros. Discovery
  11. Arkansas May Have Vast Lithium Reserves, Researchers Say
  12. Tim Cook Knows Apple Isn’t First in AI but Says ‘It’s About Being the Best’
  13. Nicolas Cage Urges Young Actors To Protect Themselves From AI
  14. A Calculator’s Most Important Button Has Been Removed
  15. AI ‘Bubble’ Will Burst 99% of Players, Says Baidu CEO

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Over 6,000 WordPress Hacked To Install Plugins Pushing Infostealers

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
WordPress sites are being compromised through malicious plugins that display fake software updates and error messages, leading to the installation of information-stealing malware. BleepingComputer reports:
Since 2023, a malicious campaign called ClearFake has been used to display fake web browser update banners on compromised websites that distribute information-stealing malware. In 2024, a new campaign called ClickFix was introduced that shares many similarities with ClearFake but instead pretends to be software error messages with included fixes. However, these “fixes” are PowerShell scripts that, when executed, will download and install information-stealing malware.

Last week, GoDaddy reported that the ClearFake/ClickFix threat actors have breached over 6,000 WordPress sites to install malicious plugins that display the fake alerts associated with these campaigns. “The GoDaddy Security team is tracking a new variant of ClickFix (also known as ClearFake) fake browser update malware that is distributed via bogus WordPress plugins,” explains GoDaddy security researcher Denis Sinegubko. “These seemingly legitimate plugins are designed to appear harmless to website administrators but contain embedded malicious scripts that deliver fake browser update prompts to end-users.”

The malicious plugins utilize names similar to legitimate plugins, such as Wordfense Security and LiteSpeed Cache, while others use generic, made-up names. Website security firm Sucuri also noted that a fake plugin named “Universal Popup Plugin” is also part of this campaign. When installed, the malicious plugin will hook various WordPress actions depending on the variant to inject a malicious JavaScript script into the HTML of the site. When loaded, this script will attempt to load a further malicious JavaScript file stored in a Binance Smart Chain (BSC) smart contract, which then loads the ClearFake or ClickFix script to display the fake banners. From web server access logs analyzed by Sinegubko, the threat actors appear to be utilizing stolen admin credentials to log into the WordPress site and install the plugin in an automated manner.

Wordpress is a massive security risk…

By SpzToid • Score: 3 Thread

Wordpress is a massive security risk/vector that serves cross functional purposes as a Content Management System (CMS). Just like how Microsoft Outlook, (nay Teams!), also does email.

NASA Further Delays First Operational Starliner Flight

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
NASA will rely on SpaceX’s Crew Dragon for two crewed missions to the ISS in 2025 while evaluating whether Boeing’s Starliner requires another test flight for certification. SpaceNews reports:
In an Oct. 15 statement, NASA said it will use Crew Dragon for both the Crew-10 mission to the ISS, scheduled for no earlier than February 2025, and the Crew-11 mission scheduled for no earlier than July. Crew-10 will fly NASA astronauts Anne McClain and Nichole Ayers along with astronaut Takuya Onishi from the Japanese space agency JAXA and Roscosmos cosmonaut Kirill Peskov. NASA has not yet announced the crew for the Crew-11 mission.

Earlier this year, NASA had hoped that Boeing’s CST-100 Starliner would be certified in time to fly the early 2025 mission. Problems with the Crew Flight Test mission, which launched in June with NASA astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams on board, led NASA to conclude in July that the spacecraft would not be certified in time. It delayed that Starliner-1 mission from February to August 2025, moving up Crew-10 to February. NASA also announced then that it would prepare Crew-11 in parallel with Starliner-1 for launch in that August 2025 slot.
“The timing and configuration of Starliner’s next flight will be determined once a better understanding of Boeing’s path to system certification is established,” NASA said in its statement about the 2025 missions. “NASA is keeping options on the table for how best to achieve system certification, including windows of opportunity for a potential Starliner flight in 2025.”

Ditch Boeing ASAP

By backslashdot • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

And please get rid of SLS. Cancel it now. Call your congresscritter and insist on it. I am serious. That thing is a cancer. The money should go to Stoke Space, Blue Origin, Relativity Space, Rocket Lab, Astra, Firefly, SpaceX, homeless guy down the street etc. Flush it down any toilet but Boeing’s.

Basecamp-Maker 37Signals Says Its ‘Cloud Exit’ Will Save It $10 Million Over 5 Years

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica:
37Signals is not a company that makes its policy or management decisions quietly. The productivity software company was an avowedly Mac-centric shop until Apple’s move to kill home screen web apps (or Progressive Web Apps, or PWAs) led the firm and its very-public-facing co-founder, David Heinemeier Hansson, to declare a “Return to Windows,” followed by a stew of Windows/Mac/Linux. The company waged a public battle with Apple over its App Store subscription policies, and the resulting outcry helped nudge Apple a bit. 37Signals has maintained an active blog for years, its co-founders and employees have written numerous business advice books, and its blog and social media posts regularly hit the front pages of Hacker News.

So when 37Signals decided to pull its seven cloud-based apps off Amazon Web Services in the fall of 2022, it didn’t do so quietly or without details. Back then, Hansson described his firm as paying “an at times almost absurd premium” for defense against “wild swings or towering peaks in usage.” In early 2023, Hansson wrote that 37Signals expected to save $7 million over five years by buying more than $600,000 worth of Dell server gear and hosting its own apps.

Late last week, Hansson had an update: it’s more like $10 million (and, he told the BBC, more like $800,000 in gear). By squeezing more hardware into existing racks and power allowances, estimating seven years’ life for that hardware, and eventually transferring its 10 petabytes of S3 storage into a dual-DC Pure Storage flash array, 37Signals expects to save money, run faster, and have more storage available. “The motto of the 2010s and early 2020s — all-cloud, everything, all the time — seems to finally have peaked,” Hansson writes. “And thank heavens for that!” He adds the caveat that companies with “enormous fluctuations in load,” and those in early or uncertain stages, still have a place in the cloud.

Why did this take them 10 years to figure out?

By Anonymous Coward • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

We already knew the cloud was just an easy but expensive solution for startups or an expensive way to temporarily scale out one’s infra.

Progressive Web Apps

By Rosco P. Coltrane • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Also known to those of my generation as “the mainframe model”:

- You don’t own what you pay for
- The software vendor changes whatever they want willy-nilly and if you don’t like it, tough cookie
- When the software vendor fucks up and introduces bugs or vulnerabilities, you can’t hold off the upgrade until it’s fixed
- If you have a problem and you’re a small company, customer service is nonexistent or insulting at best because you’re not worth the software vendor’s time
- The software vendor can charge you repeatedly whatever they want in perpetuity because you don’t buy a license, you buy a subscription

When the personal computer came about, we couldn’t get enough of it: finally computers would be yanked out of the greedy hands of IBM and the likes and we’d be free to do what we want on our own term. Finally!

And now we’re right back where we started. The more things change, the more they stay the same…

Company plays lift-and-shift

By bleedingobvious • Score: 3 Thread

Surprised to discover that it’s more expensive.

This is pretty much EVERY failed cloud journey in a nutshell and provides significant evidence 37Signals shouldn’t be viewed as techxperts on cloud. Ever.

I am permanently surprised that Azure remains cheaper than on-prem despite all the accounts of how expensive cloud is. Then again, proper prep and planning meant we didn’t just build big, stupidly expensive, VMs in the cloud. SaaS offers significant value. Storage is a damned site cheaper and requires zero maintenance . Visibility and service offering to business is signficantly improved with no need to force business through gateways or, even worse, VPNs.

That being said, pretty sure one of the internal AWS teams announced a year or so ago that they dropped AWS micro-services because of the cost. They were not wrong. The value propisition there is negative all the way.

Re:Why did this take them 10 years to figure out?

By arglebargle_xiv • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

It’s one of those things that “everyone knows” but no-one really knows. In our case (small obscure company) all it took was some bored geek sitting down and pricing out what a cloud version would cost once you went past the kiddie-level joke stuff (1 CPU, 2GB RAM, almost no disk space) and how rapidly the graph climbed after that, vs. the cost of a second-hand Dell server or two and half a day to set it up, and it was a complete no-brainer.

But most companies who aren’t run by geeks won’t know that, and in particular anyone who’s used to spraying around hundreds or even thousands of VMs (most of them obsolete, idle, or forgotten) and duct-taping the services on them together to achieve the aggregate performance of a 386 on the equivalent of a farm of Cray supercomputers, just thinks that’s the way things are done, and you can’t convince them otherwise.

Re:Why did this take them 10 years to figure out?

By waspleg • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Meanwhile in the public sector, we’re still ripping shit out and putting it in ‘the cloud’. I’m not a manager. I don’t know what the reasoning is, I suspect it’s so they can not hire and tell insurance they’re in cybersecurity compliance. We have one in particular who does not understand that it doesn’t matter how secure your shit is if no one can use it.

Amazon Ditches Plastic Air Pillows

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Amazon has reached its goal set earlier this year to completely get rid of plastic air pillows at its warehouses by the end of the year. “As of October 2024, we’ve removed all plastic air pillows from our delivery packaging used at our global fulfillment centers,” the e-commerce giant said in an October 9th blog post. The Verge reports:
It’s a welcome change following years of pressure from environmental groups to stop plastic pollution flooding into oceans. The company is still working to reduce the use of single-use plastics more broadly in its packaging. The most prolific type of plastic litter near coastlines is plastic film — a material that makes up those once ubiquitous air pillows, according to Oceana. That film also happens to be the “deadliest” type of plastic pollution for large mammals like whales and dolphins that might ingest it, Oceana says.

The company swapped out plastic air pillows and single-use delivery bags for paper and cardboard alternatives in Europe in 2022. It also ditched plastic film packaging at its facilities in India in 2020. The US is Amazon’s largest market, and the company hasn’t managed to fully eliminate plastic packaging in North America just yet. It says it plans to reduce the amount of deliveries containing “Amazon-added plastic delivery packaging” in North America to just one-third of shipments by December, down from two-thirds in December 2023.

A long way to go

By Guspaz • Score: 3 Thread

The vast majority of my small orders in Canada are still delivered in plastic Amazon mailers and not the paper mailers. It’s probably a 10:1 ratio. It’s not clear to me what the difficulty is. Just use less of the plastic ones and more of the paper ones.

Just got a plastic bubble envelope today.

By Fly Swatter • Score: 4, Informative Thread
Amazon just trying to look good while sending out bubble envelopes with a great big CAN NOT BE RECYCLED symbol. Oh, what did I order? a $5 set of rubber washers that clearly needed a 9x12 plastic bubble wrap envelope… It’s probably more plastic than 5 air pillows. SMH

If only

By dicobalt • Score: 3 Thread
there was a way to return your boxes and other packaging to Amazon…

Re:Useless

By ClickOnThis • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Now instead of useless and entirely unneeded plastic pillows (sometimes empty), now I get a few useless and unneeded sheets of paper in every box. I guess that’s an improvement.

Given that paper is a whole lot easier to recycle than plastic, I’d definitely say it’s an improvement.

That said, I do try to re-use packing materials when possible, plastic or otherwise.

One-Third of DHS’s Border Surveillance Cameras Are Broken, Memo Says

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
According to an internal Border Patrol memo, nearly one-third of the surveillance cameras along the U.S.-Mexico border don’t work. “The nationwide issue is having significant impacts on [Border Patrol] operations,” reads the memo. NBC News reports:
The large-scale outage affects roughly 150 of the 500 cameras perched on surveillance towers along the U.S.-Mexico border. It was due to “several technical problems,” according to the memo. The officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss a sensitive issue, blamed outdated equipment and outstanding repair issues.

The camera systems, known as Remote Video Surveillance Systems, have been used since 2011 to “survey large areas without having to commit hundreds of agents in vehicles to perform the same function.” But according to the internal memo, 30% were inoperable. It is not clear when the cameras stopped working.Two Customs and Border Protections officials said that some repairs have been made this month but that there are still over 150 outstanding requests for camera repairs. The officials said there are some areas that are not visible to Border Patrol because of broken cameras.

A Customs and Border Protection spokesperson said the agency has installed roughly 300 new towers that use more advanced technology. “CBP continues to install newer, more advanced technology that embrace artificial intelligence and machine learning to replace outdated systems, reducing the need to have agents working non-interdiction functions,” the spokesperson said.
The agency points the finger at the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), which is responsible for servicing the systems and repairing the cameras. “The FAA, which services the systems and repairs the cameras, has had internal problems meeting the needs of the Border Patrol, the memo says, without elaborating on what those problems are,” reports NBC News. While the FAA is sending personnel to work on the cameras, Border Patrol leaders are considering replacing them with a contractor that can provide “adequate technical support for the cameras.”
Further reading: U.S. Border Surveillance Towers Have Always Been Broken (EFF)

Re: So what?

By hdyoung • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
Youre basically correct. The leadership in both parties are engaging in theatrical histrionics in order to placate their voters, but they also know that our leaky southern border is providing the labor that our country doesnt want, but absolutely needs. Without that southern border influx, our population would be cratering like Russia, China and Europe. So, the dems talk about amnesty, and the repubs talk about a beeeaauuuttttiful wall and mass deportations, and when either party proposes actually doing anything about the border, the other party torpedos it.

Immigrant vigor is real. The people who make it here basically had to navigate a crocodile-infested triathlon. On the average, theyre healthier, hardier, younger, harder working, and more motivated than the average citizen. Theyre exactly the sort of people a country needs to thrive. So both parties yell and scream, and do nothing to stop them. They get here, and they pay for the privilege by living for decades at the bottom of the heap. They get the jobs that citizens dont want. If they do a crime, they know that its a jail term and then straight back to the home country, so most of them are really damn law-abiding. The payoff is a better life than back home and their kids get to be US citizens. Its pretty much a total win-win for the US, unless you dont like brown-skinned people. We try to filter out the very small number of actual criminals and spies, but otherwise everyone whistles and looks the other way. All the way to the bank.

Re: So what?

By walbourn • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Nothing because he directly benefits from that labor in his hotels and other business scams. He’s lying to you. You know he is lying and knew he was a liar the day you voted for him, but you pretend otherwise.

If anyone wants to stop the flow of migrants

By rsilvergun • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
You could do it almost overnight by just sending some freaking foreign aid to the two or three countries that are coming from, and hint it’s not Mexico.

Joe Biden and by extension Kamala Harris are planning to do just that. With a solid Democrat Congress they could fully fund it too. Within a few years those countries would stabilize and we would stop seeing migrants at the border.

On the other hand if you just need something to rage about and you don’t want to take the risk of actually solving problems then well, you know what to do…

I think the Republican party will do one thing

By rsilvergun • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
I think they will build the camps they’re talking about. And I think they will round up immigrants and toss them in those camps.

But deport them? Hell no. They will lease them out just like we lease out prisoners and they will work for nothing but enough food to make it through the next day and that’s if they’re lucky.

And you will be competing with all that slave labor. One of the things that held back the Southern United States was they could never transition to a consumer economy because there was too much slave labor driving wages down.

The Democrats meanwhile do actually have a plan to stop the flow of migrants. Specifically they plan on giving foreign aid to the countries they’re coming from and stop letting the CIA destabilize them.

We have a major problem with automation. If you do a bit of googling you will find that 70% of the middle class jobs lost since the ‘80s were taken by automation. And we have another major automation boom coming from machine learning and LLMs (what the media keeps calling AI).

The manufacturing job your granddad used to put your dad through college is never coming back. Robots have been doing it for quite some time and even if they don’t do every single step they do so many of them that the factory hires 1/10 the labor. The only reason China uses as much human labor as it does is because of slavery or borderline slavery.

It’s a problem the Democrats have seen coming for a long time going all the way back to Bill Clinton. Their initial solution to it was dumb as a blade of grass, their plan was we were all going to go to college and get advanced degrees and we would be the managers of the world with all the dirty jobs being done by either immigrants if they had to be done in the States or by the Chinese over in China, maybe Africa once China had modernized a bit

It was a stupid idea because the Democrats overestimated how many people could get advanced degrees and they underestimated how much the Republican party was willing to sabotage our education system. Fun fact in the 1960s public University tuition was free and it was basically free right up until the early 2000s.

Anyway Biden and Harris have figured out that didn’t work and they pivoted to unions as their solution. It’s a short-term solution because automation will eventually come for us all but the idea is that by then we’ll have enough solidarity and a voting blocks to do something about it.

So to bring it back to immigration they’ll spend a few years stopping the flow of migrants and if everything goes well that’ll be just about the time we don’t want or need them anymore to drive our economy.

But holy living fuck is that a lot to explain to somebody. Too much really. Build the wall is so much easier to say

Re: So what?

By ArchieBunker • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

You are correct. If republicans really wanted to stop people from crossing the border then they would remove the incentive and go after all the companies who exploit illegal labor. But that will never happen.

TikTok Owner Sacks Intern For Sabotaging AI Project

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
TikTok’s parent company, ByteDance, fired an intern for "maliciously interfering” with the training of one of its AI models. However, the firm “rejected claims about the extent of the damage caused by the unnamed individual, saying they ‘contain some exaggerations and inaccuracies,’" reports the BBC. From the report:
The Chinese technology giant’s Doubao ChatGPT-like generative AI model is the country’s most popular AI chatbot. “The individual was an intern with the [advertising] technology team and has no experience with the AI Lab,” ByteDance said in a statement. “Their social media profile and some media reports contain inaccuracies.” Its commercial online operations, including its large language AI models, were unaffected by the intern’s actions, the company added.

ByteDance also denied reports that the incident caused more than $10 million of damage by disrupting an AI training system made up of thousands of powerful graphics processing units (GPU). As well as firing the person in August, ByteDance said it had informed the intern’s university and industry bodies about the incident.

Not sabotage

By PPH • Score: 3 Thread

It was just Bobby Tables cousin, Eddie Ignore All Previous Instructions.

T-Mobile, AT&T Oppose Unlocking Rule, Claim Locked Phones Are Good For Users

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader writes:
T-Mobile and AT&T say US regulators should drop a plan to require unlocking of phones within 60 days of activation, claiming that locking phones to a carrier’s network makes it possible to provide cheaper handsets to consumers. “If the Commission mandates a uniform unlocking policy, it is consumers — not providers — who stand to lose the most,” T-Mobile alleged in an October 17 filing with the Federal Communications Commission. The proposed rule has support from consumer advocacy groups who say it will give users more choice and lower their costs.

T-Mobile has been criticized for locking phones for up to a year, which makes it impossible to use a phone on a rival’s network. T-Mobile claims that with a 60-day unlocking rule, “consumers risk losing access to the benefits of free or heavily subsidized handsets because the proposal would force providers to reduce the line-up of their most compelling handset offers.” If the proposed rule is enacted, “T-Mobile estimates that its prepaid customers, for example, would see subsidies reduced by 40 percent to 70 percent for both its lower and higher-end devices, such as the Moto G, Samsung A15, and iPhone 12,” the carrier said. “A handset unlocking mandate would also leave providers little choice but to limit their handset offers to lower cost and often lesser performing handsets.”
In July, the FCC approved a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) for the unlocking policy in a 5-0 vote.

The FCC is proposing “to require all mobile wireless service providers to unlock handsets 60 days after a consumer’s handset is activated with the provider, unless within the 60-day period the service provider determines the handset was purchased through fraud.”

How!?

By DaMattster • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Just how is a locked phone good for the consumer? This sounds like gaslighting by T-Mobile and AT&T. It’s actually anti-consumer. A locked phone means that the consumer is NOT free to go to the carrier of their choosing. I am all for the 60 day rule.

Don’t even remember

By Valgrus Thunderaxe • Score: 4, Informative Thread
The last time I bought a phone from the service provider. Probably my last 10 phones I’ve just bought online and moved my SIM.

Re:How!?

By _xeno_ • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Just how is a locked phone good for the consumer? This sounds like gaslighting by T-Mobile and AT&T. It’s actually anti-consumer.

Because it’s really a loan. Essentially you “buy” the phone at a reduced rate on the promise that you also buy service for the duration that the phone is locked. The provider covers a good chunk of the actual cost of the phone, and the user then has to use the provider’s service.

In that sense, the providers are correct - without being able to lock the phone and guarantee the revenue stream they’d be forced to increase the initial price of the phone.

Except, of course, the practice is scummy in other ways. Once you’ve “paid off” the loan, your price for service doesn’t go down, and your phone will remain locked until you call up the provider and make them remove the lock. Plus, there are reasons you might want to use a phone on a different provider that don’t involve canceling service on your existing one, such as traveling out of the country.

But their argument isn’t entirely nonsense. Of course, if customers can’t afford the phone immediately and need to pay it off in installments, there are other ways to do that. Such as an actual loan, with terms that make it clear that the buyer doesn’t entirely own the phone until paid off, and aren’t tricks to make the customer think they’re getting a cheap phone, when in reality they’re essentially being loaned money from the service provider.

Re:Fair is in the eye of the beholder

By caseih • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

They’ve got their contracts with cancellation fees. Seems to me their profit is safe.

Re:How!?

By dgatwood • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The issue isnt really with those on a service contract, its prepaid as per the summary:

T-Mobile estimates that its prepaid customers, for example, would see subsidies reduced by 40 percent to 70 percent for both its lower and higher-end devices

Prepaid phones will not longer be as cheap as they currently are, because the phone company would have to make the cost of the phone back in the first 60 days or possibly lose the customer to a different network.

Easy fix: All prepaid plans become BYOD. Let the customers get loans from the cell phone manufacturers. If they can’t get a loan from the cell phone manufacturer because they’re too high-risk, then they’ll have to just do what they probably should have been doing in the first place: save up their money until they can afford to buy the new phone that they want instead of buying it on credit.

The very fact that we’ve gone so far down the rabbit hole of encouraging people to buy stuff that they can’t afford that giant megacorps are claiming that locked phones are good for consumers because it lets them sell thousand-dollar phones and bill them over the course of a year or two is a pretty sure sign that at least from a fiscal responsibility perspective, our country is screwed. The only thing more disturbing would be if the public, out of a sense of entitlement to being screwed over by a glorified rent-to-own industry, agrees with that company.

Disney To Name Bob Iger’s Successor In Early 2026

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Disney has appointed former Morgan Stanley CEO James Gorman to replace Nike Executive Chairman Mark Parker as board chairman starting in January 2024, “as the media giant lays the groundwork to name a successor for CEO Bob Iger in early 2026,” reports CNBC. Iger’s contract has been extended until the end of 2026 to ensure the company finds the right fit. CNBC reports:
Gorman joined Disney’s board less than a year ago and was named the head of the succession planning committee in August. He will continue to lead that committee after he takes over as board chairman from Nike Executive Chairman Parker. “The Disney board has benefited tremendously from James Gorman’s expertise and guidance, and we are lucky to have him as our next chairman — particularly as the board continues to move forward with the succession process,” Iger said in a statement. “I’m extremely grateful to Mark Parker for his many years of board service and leadership, which have been so valuable to this company and its shareholders, and to me as CEO.” […]

Disney had initially targeted 2025 to announce a successor, as CNBC reported last year. Pushing the date back to early 2026 will give the board more time to conduct due diligence on both internal and external candidates, according to people familiar with the matter, who asked not to be named because the discussions are private.

Here’s hoping!

By Gravis Zero • Score: 3 Thread

Honestly, I think it is about time that Satan got promoted from being the head Disney’s legal department to a real executive position. ;)

iFixit’s Meta Quest 3S Teardown Reveals a Quest 2 ‘Hiding Inside’

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
In a new teardown video published last week, iFixit reveals a Quest 2 headset "hiding inside” the cheaper yet enhanced Quest 3S. The Verge reports:
The first hint of that is the headset’s Fresnel lenses, which iFixit’s Shahram Mokhtari writes in a blog post are “100% compatible” with those used by the Quest 2. The headset has the older headset’s IPD adjustment mechanism, as well; and it shares the same single LCD panel, rather than using one panel per eye, like the Meta Quest 3.

Legacy parts aside, iFixit found that the 3S uses two IR sensors for depth mapping instead of a single depth sensor. That “rare iterative improvement over the Quest 3” performed “exceptionally well in unlit spaces,” Mokhtari writes in the blog. And of course, it uses the same Qualcomm Snapdragon XR2 SoC as the Quest 3, and works with Meta’s newer Touch Plus controllers, which are sold separately.
The Quest 3S “costs $299.99, while the Quest 3 is $499.99,” notes The Verge. So, not only is the 3S cheaper but replacement parts should be easier to find since the Quest 2 “has already been around for four years.”

So Meta’s the new Lenovo?

By king*jojo • Score: 3 Thread
But with laptops you strap to your face…

‘Blade Runner 2049’ Producer Sues Tesla, Warner Bros. Discovery

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from the Hollywood Reporter:
A production company for Blade Runner 2049 has sued (PDF) Tesla, which allegedly fed images from the movie into an artificial intelligence image generator to create unlicensed promotional materials. Alcon Entertainment, in a lawsuit filed Monday in California federal court, accuses Elon Musk and his autonomous vehicle company of misappropriating the movie’s brand to promote its robotaxi at a glitzy unveiling earlier this month. The producer says it doesn’t want Blade Runner 2049 to be affiliated with Musk because of his “extreme political and social views,” pointing to ongoing efforts with potential partners for an upcoming TV series.

The complaint, which brings claims for copyright infringement and false endorsement, also names Warner Bros. Discovery for allegedly facilitating the partnership. “Any prudent brand considering any Tesla partnership has to take Musk’s massively amplified, highly politicized, capricious and arbitrary behavior, which sometimes veers into hate speech, into account,” states the complaint. “Alcon did not want BR2049 to be affiliated with Musk.” […] The lawsuit cites an agreement, the details of which are unknown to Alcon, for Warners to lease or license studio lot space, access and other materials to Tesla for the event. Alcon alleges that the deal included promotional elements allowing Tesla to affiliate its products with WBD movies. WBD was Alcon’s domestic distributor for the 2017 release of Blade Runner 2049. It has limited clip licensing rights, though not for Tesla’s livestream TV event, the lawsuit claims.

Alcon says it wasn’t informed about the brand deal until the day of the unveiling. According to the complaint, Musk communicated to WBD that he wanted to associate the robotaxi with the film. He asked the company for permission to use a still directly from the movie, which prompted an employee to send an emergency request for clearance to Alcon since international rights would be involved, the lawsuit says. The producer refused, spurring the creation of the AI images. […] Alcon seeks unspecified damages, as well as a court order barring Tesla from further distributing the disputed promotional materials.
Musk referenced Denis Villeneuve’s Blade Runner movie during the robotaxi event. “You know, I love Blade Runner, but I don’t know if we want that future,” he said. “I believe we want that duster he’s wearing, but not the, uh, not the bleak apocalypse.”
I, Robot director Alex Proyas also took to X last week, writing: “Hey Elon, Can I have my designs back please?”

Re:How lovely to see the “champions” of free speec

By Anonymous Coward • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

10 signs you might be in a cult

1) Absolute authoritarianism without accountability
2) Zero tolerance for criticism or questions
3)Lack of meaningful financial disclosure regarding budget
4) Unreasonable fears about the outside world that often involve evil conspiracies and persecutions
5) A belief that former followers are always wrong for leaving and there is never a legitimate reason for anyone else to leave
6) Abuse of members
7) Records, books, articles, or programs documenting the abuses of the leader or group
8) Followers feeling they are never able to be “good enough”
9) A belief that the leader is right at all times
10) A belief that the leader is the exclusive means of knowing “truth” or giving validation

Re:Designs are like Music

By saloomy • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
No. He did not. The movie was inspired in its design by countless SciFi artworks that came before it did. This would be like saying all modern buildings stole their design from this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…

There is only a few simple ways things can be designed that make sense, comply with regulations, and also come off as modern. When Apple patented “A rectangle with rounded corners”, this site’s chorus was vehemently against that patent. Now, when Musk imitates art that came before him, we are suddenly all for these obtuse design patents? (pun intended). I think people are more or less for or against Elon Musk because his foray into politics are indeed polarizing; but that isn’t what America is for. We are a melting pot, and many political points of view are different than one’s own, but the same standards should apply equally. Either Apple was wronged when everyone copied the iPhone’s design (they are still doing it with the “notch island”) (they weren’t wronged); or Musk is (like those who came after Apple, inspired by their designs. You can’t eat your cake and have it too; just because you don’t like the guy.

Re:Extreme?

By RobinH • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I would never vote for Trump, but the presidential election is a coin toss which means you’re calling somewhere north of 45% of the American population “extremist.” That’s absurd. People vote for candidates for all kinds of reasons even if they don’t like them, and American presidential elections have very much been a combination of identity politics and “lesser of who evils” for a while now.

The “other side” is absolutely not evil. They have different priorities. Most of the people voting for Harris are doing it because abortion is their top priority, and most of the people voting for Trump are doing it because jobs are their top priority. That’s literally the divide. And the majority of Harris voters are also concerned about jobs and the economy, and the majority of Trump voters don’t care much about abortion. This is why republicans have been seen softening the abortion stance, and why the dems have been working so hard to win back labor voters. If you can’t accept this basic feature of democracy then you’re not living in the real world.

Stop demonizing the other side. They’re not evil. Most people are genuinely decent. They’re human beings, and if you were broke down on the side of the road and asked them for help they’d gladly lend a hand (both sides would). Stop dehumanizing them.

Did this producer invent the color orange?

By Guillermito • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

I looked at the linked PDF of the legal complaint. It contains a couple of exhibits illustrating the allegedly plagiarized images. They show a man standing in front of an orange-hued urban landscape, not dissimilar from those that occur in reality during wildfire episodes

Claiming copyright infringement on generic images of orange skies would be akin to the producer of the movie “The Beach” suing anyone who prints images of a beach resort with white sands and turquoise waters.

Wow

By SuperDre • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
Making a crappy sequel to an excellent movie entitled you to anything said about the movie? “Musk referenced Denis Villeneuve’s Blade Runner” No he didn’t reference DV’s Blade Runner, he referenced Ridley Scott’s Blade Runner, that’s the association I had when he said it, not that crappy movie by Villeneuve. And sorry, but Optimus doesn’t look anything like the robots from ‘I, robot’, which in itself aren’t original at all and copied movies, comics and games before it.

Arkansas May Have Vast Lithium Reserves, Researchers Say

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
Researchers at the United States Geological Survey and the Arkansas government announced on Monday that they had found a trove of lithium, a critical raw material for electric vehicle batteries, in an underground brine reservoir in Arkansas. From a report:
With the help of water testing and machine learning, the researchers determined that there might be five million to 19 million tons of lithium — more than enough to meet all of the world’s demand for the metal — in a geological area known as the Smackover Formation. Several companies, including Exxon Mobil, are developing projects in Arkansas to produce lithium, which is dissolved in underground brine.

Energy and mining companies have long produced oil, gas and other natural resources in the Smackover, which extends from Texas to Florida. And the federal and state researchers said lithium could be extracted from the waste stream of the brines from which companies extracted other forms of energy and elements. The energy industry, with the Biden administration’s encouragement, has been increasingly working to produce the raw materials needed for the lithium-ion batteries in the United States. A few projects have started recently, and many more are in various stages of study and development across the country.

Most of the world’s lithium is produced in Australia and South America. A large majority of it is then processed in China, which also dominates the manufacturing of electric vehicle batteries. “The potential for increased U.S. production to replace imports has implications for employment, manufacturing and supply chain resilience,” David Applegate, the director of the United States Geological Survey, said in a statement announcing the study. “This study illustrates the value of science in addressing economically important issues.”

Re:Is it economical?

By ShanghaiBill • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Problem with brines is that to get lithium out of them, you must evaporate a lot of water.

Nope. There is no need to evaporate the water.

Just dump sodium carbonate into the brine. It will dissolve and disassociate into ions. The -CO3 ion will then react with the lithium ions. Lithium carbonate is insoluble in water and will precipitate out.

Lithium carbonate is a commodity product that can be sold directly to battery manufacturers.

Re:Is it economical?

By ShanghaiBill • Score: 4, Informative Thread

The process is more efficient if the brine is concentrated.

So, if you’ve got plenty of sunshine, why not use it?

You can also concentrate the brine with osmotic membranes instead of evaporation.

Re:And all of that

By markdavis • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

>“Should go to Trump to calm him down. Maybe he will stop talking about pointing military guns at US citizens.”

TDS is so rampant here.

Which party wants to weaponize the military against citizens?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?…

https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portal…

Re:Is it economical?

By ShanghaiBill • Score: 4, Informative Thread

If this is uncompetitive with evaporation, is this so inefficient as to make it uncompetitive even with mining?

Lithium from hard rock mining has historically been cheaper, but new techniques, such as selective osmotic membranes, are making brine more cost-effective.

Other products from brine can be co-produced, such as magnesium, potassium, rubidium, gallium, bromine, iodine, etc.

There may also be revenue from sequestration. After all the good stuff is extracted, you need to dispose of the brine. There are two options:

1. Dump it into the Mississippi River
2. Pump it back down the hole

The greenies will object to #1, so #2 is it. But as long as you’re pumping it back “down-hole,” you can saturate it with CO2 and pump that down with it. The CO2 makes the pumping easier by increasing the density. Then you sell the carbon credits.

Re:And all of that

By Darinbob • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

The Trump party. This is not the same as the GOP party, which is full of RINOs. Trump party is about whatever Trump is for, and they’re against whatever Trump is against, and don’t bother writing any of it down because he won’t remember from day to day what he said and will deny it anyway.

Tim Cook Knows Apple Isn’t First in AI but Says ‘It’s About Being the Best’

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
Apple CEO Tim Cook has acknowledged the company’s late entry into AI, stating, "We weren’t the first to do intelligence.” Despite this admission, Cook defended Apple’s approach, claiming it will be “the best for the customer.”

The tech giant plans to roll out initial AI features on October 28, with more advanced capabilities expected in 2025. However, internal studies suggest Apple’s AI lags behind competitors, with Siri reportedly 25% less accurate than ChatGPT. Cook remains optimistic, asserting that AI will make users’ time on iPhones “profoundly different.”

Oh, Apple.

By nightflameauto • Score: 3 Thread

Can’t wait for Siri to suck just marginally less than it does right now. That’ll be “best.” Good grief.

It’s true though

By backslashdot • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

I have the beta and already found it useful and convenient to ask Siri things. For example I asked it to translate something I was saying into a foreign language and vice versa when talking to someone. I could see myself using it for a lot of things .. basic fact checking or things like Siri make a note of the fact that I need to buy or do something at a particular time/place. That is beyond the current Siri of texting or calling people.

They don’t need to be as good as ChatGPT .. but what they have in the beta is good enough. What I fear is history portability and things like that if I want to move everything to Android. I don’t like giving anyone a monopoly for stupid shit.

Most people aren’t used to having an assistant around so it will take some getting used to.

It’s worth pointing out…

By YuppieScum • Score: 3 Thread

…that Apple haven’t been first in anything.

This is not to say that many of their products have not been successful, just that none have been original - with the possible exception of iTunes.

Yeah, this’ll probably get modded down, but it is nonetheless objectively true.

When “the best” is still crap…

By gweihir • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

It really does not matter. It has become obvious (again) that this AI hype is not a very big breakthrough (again) and that the promises made by the companies behind it vere vastly overstated (again).

Re:It’s worth pointing out…

By JoeCommodore • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

True they may not have been the first, but they usually deliver the most polished and relevant version of whatever they are doing.

Then again, Microsoft kinda throws their tech (which is usually more conceptual than a fully realized product) at everything in hopes something might stick. Usually it doesn’t work in their favor though.

Nicolas Cage Urges Young Actors To Protect Themselves From AI

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
Actor Nicolas Cage warned young performers about the dangers of AI in film production during his speech at the Newport Beach Film Festival on Sunday. Cage urged actors to protect their craft from employment-based digital replica (EBDR) technology, which allows studios to manipulate performances post-filming. “This technology wants to take your instrument,” Cage said. He explained that EBDR enables studios to alter actors’ faces, voices, and body language after shooting, potentially compromising artistic integrity. Cage cited his cameo in “The Flash” as an example of EBDR use. He advised actors to consider their rights when approached with contracts permitting EBDR, coining the phrase “MVMFMBMI: my voice, my face, my body, my imagination.”

You need to watch better movies

By rsilvergun • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
A good actor brings a completely different imagination to a role. Go look up John Hurt (the guy with the chest burster in Alien) playing the fool in King Leer. You’d hardly know it was him.

Re:Numbered days

By ChunderDownunder • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

What film producers don’t appreciate is that when you take Nic Cage’s gloriously hammy acting out of the equation, their AI-written scripts aren’t worth the price of a download.

Maybe I need to touch grass but the only time I paid for a movie ticket in an actual cinema post-COVID was for a European film festival - Hollywood just doesn’t market films for Gen-X kids any longer, except a bunch of pointless remakes.

(Red Rock West is still a classic, Cage fans.)

Re:You need to watch better movies

By PPH • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

This https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tears_in_rain_monologue comes to mind.

Re:His Imagination?

By fahrbot-bot • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Directors who do not actively encourage their actors to bring their own creativity to the role are hacks who produce crap movies.

To be fair, directors are also part of the creative process and are responsible for the work as a whole, not just the individual performer and both parts must work together to produce the final product. Having either the director or actors be too controlling or go off the rails isn’t productive.

In an ideal world

By sixsixtysix • Score: 3 Thread
In an ideal world, one could just say “play Star Wars, but with Nic Cage playing all the roles” and have it rendered in real-time, with the only payment going to your electric company.

A Calculator’s Most Important Button Has Been Removed

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
Apple’s latest iOS update has removed the “C” button from its Calculator app, replacing it with a backspace function. The change, part of iOS 18, has sparked debate among users accustomed to the traditional clear function. The removal of the “C” button represents a significant departure from decades-old calculator design conventions, The Atlantic writes. From the story:
The “C” button’s function is vestigial. Back when calculators were commercialized, starting in the mid-1960s, their electronics were designed to operate as efficiently as possible. If you opened up a desktop calculator in 1967, you might have found a dozen individual circuit boards to run and display its four basic mathematical functions. Among these would have been an input buffer or temporary register that could store an input value for calculation and display. The “C” button, which was sometimes labeled “CE” (Clear Entry) or “CI” (Clear Input), provided a direct interface to zero out — or “clear” — such a register. A second button, “AC” (All Clear), did the same thing, but for other parts of the circuit, including previously stored operations and pending calculations. (A traditional calculator’s memory buttons — “M+,” “M-,” “MC” — would perform simple operations on a register.)

By 1971, Mostech and Texas Instruments had developed a “calculator on a chip,” which condensed all of that into a single integrated circuit. Those chips retained the functions of their predecessors, including the ones that were engaged by “C” and “AC” buttons. And this design continued on into the era of pocket calculators, financial calculators, and even scientific calculators such as the ones you may have used in school. Some of the latter were, in essence, programmable pocket computers themselves, and they could have been configured with a backspace key. They were not.

The most important button on a calculator

By rossdee • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

is the Enter key

Can still clear everything …

By fahrbot-bot • Score: 5, Informative Thread

From TFA:

… the iPhone’s “AC” button remains. When no value sits in the input buffer awaiting its desired mathematical operation, the [backspace] button changes to “AC.” The ability to destroy all local mathematics remains, at least for now.

And Apple’s redesign is inferior

By drnb • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
And Apple’s redesign is inferior. All three buttons are useful.

[BS], backspace, operates on individual digits and operators
[C] clear, operates on operands (collections of digits) and operators
[CA] clear all, operates on the entire pending expression (all operands and operators)

You might want to do any of the following depending on the nature of a typo, consider “12 + 34”

[BS]: “12 + 3”
[BS][BS]: “12 +"
[BS][BS][BS]: “12”
[BS][BS][BS][BS]: “1”
[BS][BS][BS][BS][BS]:""

[C]: “12 +"
[C][C]: “12”
[C][C][C]: ""

[CA]: ""

Re:And Apple’s redesign is inferior

By The-Ixian • Score: 5, Funny Thread

I think the word you are looking for is “courageous”

Re:And Apple’s redesign is inferior

By herberttlbd • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

The old app was single entry and worked like a single entry calculator. The new app is algebraic entry and works like an algebraic entry calculator.

Your example is for algebraic entry but I don’t think I’ve ever seen an algebraic that supports C, only AC and backspace. I looked at all of my Casios, Sharps, TIs, and HPs and none of them support it. Can you provide an example that does?

AI ‘Bubble’ Will Burst 99% of Players, Says Baidu CEO

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot
Baidu CEO Robin Li has proclaimed that hallucinations produced by large language models are no longer a problem, and predicted a massive wipeout of AI startups when the “bubble” bursts. From a report:
“The most significant change we’re seeing over the past 18 to 20 months is the accuracy of those answers from the large language models,” gushed the CEO at last week’s Harvard Business Review Future of Business Conference. “I think over the past 18 months, that problem has pretty much been solved — meaning when you talk to a chatbot, a frontier model-based chatbot, you can basically trust the answer,” he added.

Li also described the AI sector as in an “inevitable bubble,” similar to the dot-com bubble in the ‘90s. “Probably one percent of the companies will stand out and become huge and will create a lot of value or will create tremendous value for the people, for the society. And I think we are just going through this kind of process,” stated Li. The CEO also guesstimated it will be another 10 to 30 years before human jobs are displaced by the technology. “Companies, organizations, governments and ordinary people all need to prepare for that kind of paradigm shift,” he warned.

Not a great comparison

By RogueWarrior65 • Score: 3 Thread

In the dotcom era, anyone could build a website and startups blew their funding on expensive offices, Herman-Miller chairs, Silicon Graphics workstations, and a powered paragliders (yes I saw all of this at a bankruptcy auction in Santa Monica). None of that stuff was required to build a product. LLMs require a lot of expensive infrastructure and you need the proverbial killer-app to pitch to investors who are a little bit smarter than they were 20+ years ago. That’s going to increase the signal-to-noise ratio.

What problems do LLMs solve?

By RobinH • Score: 3 Thread
When faced with a so-called solution, you really need to focus on what problem it’s solving. I’ve seen generative AI that can create all kinds of clipart or thumbnail images which are good enough for a business presentation or a low-production-value YouTube video. That’s solving a real problem that people have, and I see evidence of people using it (and digital artists looking to change careers). On the other hand, where are the legions of people who are using LLMs to solve real-world problems? High school students writing essays? It’s clearly not that useful for coding unless you’re a very, very beginner programmer. It apparently makes more mistakes than human programmers when converting a code base to another language. Seriously, if LLMs were as valuable a the hype claimed, you’d already be seeing a profound impact, and we’re simply not seeing it.

“the society”

By VeryFluffyBunny • Score: 3 Thread
He read about it in a magazine once. Apparently, people react positively to the term so he’s going to use it.

So…

By zkiwi34 • Score: 3 Thread
Was that his prediction, or an AI prediction?

Re:What problems do LLMs solve?

By Whateverthisis • Score: 4, Informative Thread
I’m a huge AI skeptic. However…

I have found uses for it. My family and I go on relatively long vacations to places we’ve never been, and the research to plan for it can sometimes outstrip the time we actually are on the vacation. ChatGPT does a great job of condensing a rather large amount of information into a condensed, reasonably well organized narrative that cuts down that research tremendously.

I’ve also used it for creating marketing material at work and designing entire D&D campaigns. Again, because it’s condensing a lot of known information on the internet into a format I can then get the gist of what I want, and from there edit and expand to what I actually want.

So using my own anecdotal experiences, when you’re starting from a blank sheet of paper, that can be very difficult for most humans. But what humans are really excellent at is taking something in front of them and determining if it’s good enough or not, and if not how to edit it to make good enough. So LLMs do overcome the “blank-sheet-of-paper”, or “zero to one” phase of developing something. Can they produce a good finished product? No. Will they ever? Maybe but doubtful. Do they operate well in the edge cases of human language like politics and opinions and subjectivity? No and probably never will. But there is a value in giving you a starting point on a project and then working from there.

It remains to be seen however if we’re willing to pay for that and how much, and how much of a business that becomes to justify the investment. In that sense, the CEO of Baidu is 100% correct, many companies will crash.

But in the recent article discussing MicroSoft’s role with OpenAI, I think Microsoft is doing the right thing. There is no value in the work to research and get a business insight, there is only value in the insight. So if an AI agent can assess language in emails, CRMs, financials, or what have you and create a correct, actionable task that will be a useful thing to do at work and the person didn’t need to do the research to figure that out, then there’s a place for it in the enterprise domain.

Artificial General Intelligence? Yeah, no. I created my own Intelligences thank you very much. They’re about to hit puberty and have very strong and ridiculous opinions about all sorts of things (and require constant power generation in the form of dinner), and I question the sources of data feeding them all the time (at school), and they rarely function the way I want them to. Why would I want an artificial one causing me the same problems? No thank you, no value there.