Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Judge Allows BitTorrent Seeding Claims Against Meta, Despite Lawyers ‘Lame Excuses’
  2. Microsoft Copilot Is Now Injecting Ads Into Pull Requests On GitHub
  3. Sony Shuts Down Nearly Its Entire Memory Card Business Due To SSD Shortage
  4. Tech CEOs Suddenly Love Blaming AI For Mass Job Cuts
  5. New Company Hopes to Build Age-Verification Tech into Vape Cartridges
  6. Apple’s Early Days: Massive Oral History Shares Stories About Young Wozniak and Jobs
  7. Rivian and Lucid Win Right to Sell Their EVs Directly to Buyers in Washington State
  8. Will Social Media Change After YouTube and Meta’s Court Defeat?
  9. Is It Time For Open Source to Start Charging For Access?
  10. ‘Project Hail Mary’: Real Space Science, Real Astrophotography
  11. World’s Smallest QR Code - Smaller Than Bacteria - Could Store Data for Centuries
  12. This Friendly Robot Just Installed 100 MW of Solar Power
  13. Bluesky’s Newest Product: an AI Tool That Gives You Custom Feeds
  14. Amazon Gambles on $4B Push Into America’s Rural Areas, May Soon Carry More Parcels Than USPS
  15. Apple Now Requires Device-Level Age Verification in the UK. Could the US Be Next?

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Judge Allows BitTorrent Seeding Claims Against Meta, Despite Lawyers ‘Lame Excuses’

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from TorrentFreak:
In an effort to gather material for its LLM training, Meta used BitTorrent to download pirated books from Anna’s Archive and other shadow libraries. According to several authors, Meta facilitated the infringement of others by "seeding” these torrents. This week, the court granted the authors permission to add these claims to their complaint, despite openly scolding their counsel for “lame excuses” and “Meta bashing.” […] The judge acknowledged that the contributory infringement claim could and should have been added back in November 2024, when the authors amended their complaint to include the distribution claim. After all, both claims arise from the same factual allegations about Meta’s torrenting activity.

“The lawyers for the named plaintiffs have no excuse for neglecting to add a contributory infringement claim based on these allegations back in November 2024,” Judge Chhabria wrote. The lawyers of the book authors claimed that the delay was the result of newly produced evidence that had “crystallized” their understanding of Meta’s uploading activity. However, that did not impress the judge. He called it a “lame excuse” and “a bunch of doubletalk,” noting that if the missing discovery truly prevented the contributory claim from being added in November 2024, the same logic would have prevented the distribution claim from being added at that time as well. “Rather than blaming Meta for producing discovery late, the plaintiffs’ lawyers should have been candid with the Court, explaining that they missed an issue in a case of first impression..,” the order reads.

Judge Chhabria went further, noting that the authors’ law firm, Boies Schiller, showed “an ongoing pattern” of distracting from its own mistakes by attacking Meta. He pointed specifically to the dispute over when Meta disclosed its fair use defense to the distribution claim, which we covered here recently, characterizing it as a false distraction. “The lawyers for the plaintiffs seem so intent on bashing Meta that they are unable to exercise proper judgment about how to represent the interests of their clients and the proposed class members,” the order reads. Despite the criticism, Chhabria granted the motion. […] For now, the case moves forward with a fourth amended complaint, three new loan-out companies added as named plaintiffs, and a growing list of BitTorrent-related claims for Judge Chhabria to resolve.

Microsoft Copilot Is Now Injecting Ads Into Pull Requests On GitHub

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Microsoft Copilot is reportedly injecting promotional “tips” into GitHub pull requests, with Neowin claiming more than 1.5 million PRs have been affected by messages advertising integrations like Raycast, Slack, Teams, and various IDEs. From the report:
According to Melbourne-based software developer Zach Manson, a team member used the AI to fix a simple typo in a pull request. Copilot did the job, but it also took the liberty of editing the PR’s description to include this message: “Quickly spin up Copilot coding agent tasks from anywhere on your macOS or Windows machine with Raycast.” A quick search of that phrase on GitHub shows that the same promotional text appears in over 11,000 pull requests across thousands of repositories. Even merge requests on GitLab aren’t safe from the injection.

So what’s happening? Well, Raycast has a Copilot extension that can do things like create pull requests from a natural language command. The ad directly names Raycast, so you might think that Raycast is injecting the promo into the PRs to market its own app. But it is more likely that Microsoft is the one doing the injecting. If you look at the raw markdown of the affected pull requests, there is a hidden HTML comment, “START COPILOT CODING AGENT TIPS” placed right just before the ad tip. This suggests Microsoft is using the comment to insert a “tip” that points back to its own developer ecosystem or partner integrations.

Reverse Centaurgirl

By Pseudonymous Powers • Score: 5, Funny Thread
Look, this is just the way the software industry works now! No more hiding from the future of development. No more heads in the sand to deny the apotheosis of programming! No more pretending that the new way isn’t better! You Luddites are just going to have to come to grips with the fact the Crest Whitening Strips are recommended to the leading competitor’s whitening system three to one!

Clever approach

By TwistedGreen • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

I really like this approach. The next step would be to put ads directly into the source code. Soon you’ll see comments like

/**
** THIS FUNCTION WAS BROUGHT TO YOU BY EXPRESSVPN
** USE CODE COPILOT26 FOR 90% OFF THE 3 YEAR PLAN
**/

You could quickly monetize your open source projects this way.

Could be worse

By Locke2005 • Score: 4, Funny Thread
They could have Clippy pop up and say things like, “It looks like you are trying to insert trojans into this encryption code. Would you like help with that?”

you jackasses are smart enough to do self hosting

By Big Hairy Gorilla • Score: 3, Insightful Thread
so why are using Microshit?

This is a case where you should blame the victim.
Also, Jack, it’s not too late to self host.
So get cracking … spend your time on self improvement, not complaining that they dun it to ya.

Sony Shuts Down Nearly Its Entire Memory Card Business Due To SSD Shortage

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
For the “foreseeable future,” Sony says it has stopped accepting new orders for most of its CFexpress and SD memory card lines due to the an ongoing memory supply shortage. “Due to the global shortage of semiconductors (memory) and other factors, it is anticipated that supply will not be able to meet demand for CFexpress memory cards and SD memory cards for the foreseeable future,” the company said in a notice. “Therefore, we have decided to temporarily suspend the acceptance of orders from our authorized dealers and from customers at the Sony Store from March 27, 2026 onwards. PetaPixel reports:
The suspension includes all of Sony’s memory card lines, including CFexpress Type A, CFexpress Type B, and SD cards. The 240GB, 480GB, 960GB, and 1920GB capacity Type A cards have been suspended, as have the 480GB and 240GB Type B cards. The full gamut of Sony’s high-end SD cards has also been suspended, including the 256GB, 128GB, and 64GB TOUGH-branded cards and the lower-end 512GB, 256GB, 128GB, and 256GB plainly-branded Sony cards, which cap out at V60 speeds. Even Sony’s lower-end, V30 128GB and 64GB SD cards have been suspended, showcasing that the SSD shortage affects all types of solid state, not just the high-end ones.

It appears that only the 960GB CFexpress Type B card and the lowest-end SF-UZ series SD cards remain in production. However, those UHS-I SD cards are discontinued in the United States outside of a scant few retailers and resellers. “We sincerely apologize for any inconvenience this may cause our customers,” Sony concludes.

Dear Tech Gods

By Tablizer • Score: 3, Informative Thread

Make the AI bubble pop already. I’ll stop wanking off for a year if you pop it, I swear on my rosie palm.

What good is AI

By ebunga • Score: 3 Thread

If there are no computers that are able to access it and no new data to feed it?

Tech CEOs Suddenly Love Blaming AI For Mass Job Cuts

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from the BBC:
Sweeping job cuts at Big Tech companies have become an annual tradition. How executives explain those decisions, however, has changed. Out are buzzwords like efficiency, over-hiring, and too many management layers. Today, all explanations stem from artificial intelligence (AI). In recent weeks, giants including Google, Amazon, Meta, as well as smaller firms such as Pinterest and Atlassian, have all announced or warned of plans to shrink their workforce, pointing to developments in AI that they say are allowing their firms to do more with fewer people. […] But explaining cuts by pointing to advances in AI sounds better than citing cost pressures or a desire to please shareholders, says tech investor Terrence Rohan, who has had a seat on many company boards. “Pointing to AI makes a better blog post,” Rohan says. “Or it at least doesn’t make you seem as much the bad guy who just wants to cut people for cost-effectiveness.”

That does not mean there is no substance behind the words, Rohan added. Some of the companies he’s backing are using code that is 25% to 75% AI-generated. That is a sign of the real threat that AI tools for writing code represent to jobs such as software developer, computer engineer and programmer, posts once considered a near-guarantee of highly paid, stable careers. “Some of it is that the narrative is changing, some of it is that we really are starting to see step changes in productivity,” Anne Hoecker, a partner at Bain who leads the consultancy’s technology practice, says of the recent job cuts. “Leaders more recently are seeing these tools are good enough that you really can do the same amount of work with fundamentally less people.”

There is another way that AI is driving job cuts — and it has nothing to do with the technical abilities of coding tools and chatbots. Amazon, Meta, Google and Microsoft are collectively planning to pour $650 billion into AI in the coming year. As executives hunt for ways to try to ease investor shock at those costs, many are landing on payroll, typically tech firms’ single biggest expense. […] Although the expense of, for example, 30,000 corporate Amazon employees is dwarfed by that company’s AI spending plans, firms of this size will now take any opportunity to cut costs, Rohan says. “They’re playing a game of inches,” Rohan says of cuts at Big Tech firms. “If you can even slightly tune the machine, that is helpful.” Hoecker says cutting jobs also signals to stock market investors worried about the “real and huge” cost of AI development that executives are not blithely writing blank cheques. “It shows some discipline,” says Hoecker. “Maybe laying off people isn’t going to make much of a dent in that bill, but by creating a little bit of cashflow, it helps.”

BS

By RobinH • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
The CEOs of these companies are trying to justify inflated stock prices that were high based on the expectation of future growth. You don’t convince investors that you’re still growing by laying people off, so you have to give them some kind of explanation, and AI is convenient. By the time it becomes obvious that AI isn’t actually producing the productivity boost that they’re claiming, then they’ll be on to the next thing. The reality is that the cheap capital that funded the dot com companies through to about 2018 is gone permanently (due to demographic and globalization changes). The valuations will eventually crash. It’s just a game of everyone playing chicken to see who sells first.

Not me guv

By GeekWithAKnife • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Honestly I didn’t go on a hiring jolly and double my workforce in a short period of time without really havung work for them.

It’s all because of AI!

Re:Insider perspective: AI helps with amnesia only

By gweihir • Score: 4 Thread

The point being…AI doesn’t tangibly save time. It might save a bit under some circumstances, but not enough to justify layoffs. The CEOs are full of shit.

Pretty much this. LLMs can be convenient, but they are not magic and that they make competent coders slower is pretty well established by now.

The blind marketing to the blind …

By thomst • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

MBAs are sheep. Blindly following the flock is what MBA schools teach them to do - and questioning conventional wisdom is strictly verboten.

Why else would they worship at the altar of stockholder supremacy, when transferring all their company’s liquid assets to high-volume stock trading algorithms forces them to borrow money at commercial interest rates to fund their “investment” in AI, instead of using cash on hand for the purpose, and saving the interest payments for other investment purposes … ?

Re:BS

By ranton • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

The CEOs of these companies are trying to justify inflated stock prices that were high based on the expectation of future growth.

No, CEOs are trying to show their board, investors, and activist investors that they have a plan for how to take advantage of AI and can at least keep up with their competitors use of AI, if not surpass them. I work at a large enterprise (close to 50k employees) and VPs are being told that they need to find ways for AI to have an impact on their department or their leaders will find someone who can. If it isn’t happening fast enough consultants are brought in to take over their department’s transformative roadmap and leaders who can’t keep up are relegated to being SMEs until they are eventually replaced. I’m not in the room when that message is given, but I’ve seen the rapid shift of VPs who were raising alarms nearly immediately turn into AI cheerleaders.

If you work for a publicly traded or VC backed company I assure you your CEO does not have a choice on whether to jump on the AI bandwagon. That’s not how hype driven bubbles work.

New Company Hopes to Build Age-Verification Tech into Vape Cartridges

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Their goal is to use biometric data and blockchain to build age-verification measures directly into disposable vape cartridges.

Wired reports on a partnership between vape/cartridge manufacturer Ispire Technology and regulatory consulting company Chemular (which specializes in the nicotine market) — which they’ve named “Ike Tech”:
[Using blockchain-based security, the e-cig cartridge] would use a camera to scan some form of ID and then also take a video of the user’s face. Once it verifies your identity and determines you’re old enough to vape, it translates that information into anonymized tokens. That info goes to an identity service like ID.me or Clear. If approved, it bounces back to the app, which then uses a Bluetooth signal to give the vape the OK to turn on.

“Everything is tokenized,” [says Ispire CEO Michael Wang]. “As a result of this process, we don’t communicate consumer personal private information.” He says the process takes about a minute and a half… After that onetime check, the Bluetooth connection on the phone will recognize when the vape cartridge is nearby and keep it unlocked. Move the vape too far away from the phone, and it shuts off again. Based on testing, the companies behind Ike Tech claim this process has a 100 percent success rate in age verification, more or less calling the tech infallible. “The FDA told us it’s the holy grail technology they were looking for,” Wang says. “That’s word-for-word what they said when we met with them....”

Wang says the goal is to implement additional features in the verification process, like geo-fencing, which would force the vape to shut off while near a school or on an airplane. In the future, the plan is to license this biometric verification tech to other e-cig companies. The tech may also grow to include fingerprint readers and expand to other product categories; Wang suggests guns, which have a long history of age-verification features not quite working.

Glad I don’t smoke

By Powercntrl • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I already hate that I need a smartphone app to charge my EV at most DCFC stations (the one saving grace is that I don’t need to fast charge all that often), but having to use an app every time you want to get your nicotine fix would be a real pain in the ass. Something tells me if this actually caught on, vapers would just go back to smoking the old fashioned combustion form of cancer sticks.

Re: Glad I don’t smoke

By ThurstonMoore • Score: 5, Informative Thread

The world has become so horrible in the last 10-15 years.

Re:Blockchain???

By cayenne8 • Score: 5, Funny Thread
Fuck it....

I’m gonna just go back to smoking real cigarettes....

It was MUCH more fun anyway…you got to carry a lighter all the time, play with fire....and flicking ashes at the bar while talking to a girl just felt....right.

Hell, maybe go back a bit further and buy loose tobacco and roll my own.

Pure analog pleasure.....geez I miss it.....

Re:First against the wall

By drinkypoo • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Railing against age verification while an orange man is sending the military into your cities, destroying your way of life and antagonizing the whole world against you is priceless.

Age verification is not what is being discussed, and only an incredibly simple person who is completely unable to imagine ramifications of what is obviously ubiquitous identity verification would make such a drastic mistake. This kind of technology is an obvious component of “sending the military into [our] cities” and “destroying [our] way of life” and is in fact exactly what the followers of the orange piggy are promoting. Did you not notice what’s going on with e.g. flock? Fucking wake up and learn to pay attention, fascism enabler.

Stop That

By bill_mcgonigle • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

You people have gone insane.

Stop trying to control every atom of existence and every move people make.

You’re sick in the head, not visionaries, not thought leaders.

Go plant a garden and get back in touch with the real world.

No, NOT FARMVILLE!

Apple’s Early Days: Massive Oral History Shares Stories About Young Wozniak and Jobs

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Apple’s 50th anniversary is this week — and Fast Company’s Harry McCracken just published an 11,000-word oral history with some fun stories from Apple’s earliest days and the long and winding road to its very first home computers:
Steve Wozniak, cofounder, Apple: I told my dad when I was in high school, “I’m going to own a computer someday.” My dad said, “It costs as much as a house.” And I sat there at the table — I remember right where we were sitting — and I said, “I’ll live in an apartment.” I was going to have a computer if it was ever possible. I didn’t need a house.
Woz even remembers trying to build a home computer early on with a teenaged Steve Jobs and Bill Fernandez from rejected parts procured from local electronics companies. Woz designed it — “not from anybody else’s design or from a manual. And Fernandez was one of those kids that could use a soldering iron.”
Bill Fernandez: The computer was very basic. It was working, and we were starting to talk about how we could hook a teletype up to it. Mrs. Wozniak called a reporter from the San Jose Mercury, and he came over with a photographer. We set up the computer on the floor of Steve Wozniak’s bedroom.

Well, the core integrated circuit that ran the power supply that I built was an old reject part. We turned on the computer, and the power supply smoked and burnt out the circuitry. So we didn’t get our photos in the paper with an article about the boy geniuses.
But within a few years Jobs and Wozniak both wound up with jobs at local tech companies. Atari cofounder Nolan Bushnell remembers that Steve Jobs “wasn’t a good engineer, but he was a great technician. He was pristine in his ability to solder, which was actually important in those days.” Meanwhile Allen Baum had shared Wozniak’s high school interest in computers, and later got Woz a job working at Hewlett-Packard — where employees were allowed to use stockroom parts for private projects. (“When he needed some parts, even if we didn’t have them, I could order them.”) Baum helped with the Apple I and II, and joined Apple a decade later.

Wozniak remembers being inspired to build that first Apple I by the local Homebrew Computing Club, people “talking about great things that would happen to society, that we would be able to communicate like we never did [before] and educate in new ways. And being a geek would be important and have value.” And once he’d built his first computer, “I wanted these people to help create the revolution. And so I passed out my designs with no copyright notices — public domain, open source, everything. A couple of other people in the club did build it.”

But Woz and Jobs had even tried pitching the computer as a Hewlett-Packard product, Woz remembers:
Steve Wozniak: I showed them what it would cost and how it would work and what it could do with my little demos. They had all the engineering people and the marketing people, and they turned me down. That was the first of five turndowns from Hewlett-Packard. Steve Jobs and I had to go into business on our own.
In the end, Randy Wigginton, Apple employee No. 6 remembers witnessing Jobs, Wozniak, and Ronald Wayne the signing of Apple’s founding contract, “which is pretty funny, because I was 15 at the time.” And it was Allen Baum’s father who gave Wozniak and Jobs the bridge loan to buy the parts they’d need for their first 500 computers.

After all the memories, the article concludes that “Trying to connect every dot between Apple, the tiny, dirt-poor 1970s startup, and Apple, the $3.7 trillion 21st-century global colossus, is impossible.”
But this much is clear: The company has always been at its best when its original quirky humanity and willingness to be an outlier shine through.

Mark Johnson, Apple employee No. 13: I was in Cupertino just yesterday. It’s totally different. They own Cupertino now.

Jonathan Rotenberg, who cofounded the Boston Computer Society in 1977 at age 13: People want to hate Apple, because it is big and powerful. But Apple has an underlying moral purpose that is immensely deep and expansive…

Mike Markkula, the early retiree from Intel whose guidance and money turned the garage startup into a company: The culture mattered. People were there for the right reasons — to build something transformative — not just to make money. That alignment produced extraordinary results…

Steve Wozniak: Everything you do in life should have some element of joy in it. Even your work should have an element of joy… When you’re about to die, you have certain memories. And for me, it’s not going to be Apple going public or Apple being huge and all that. It’s really going to be stories from the period when humble people spotted something that was interesting and followed it

I’ll be thinking of that when I die, along with a lot of pranks I played. The important things.

Re:Wozniak - the real reason for Apple

By Petersko • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

It’s too convenient to just write off Jobs. The truth is somewhere in the middle, as it always is. The idea that plenty of others could have done what he did is just too dismissive. When he died the company was worth a third of a trillion dollars. Not just any sociopath can pull that off.

Re:Wozniak - the real reason for Apple

By serviscope_minor • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Jobs gets all the accolades and fame but he was just a pushy sociopath in a suit,

Suit? The guy who famously wore a black turtleneck all the time?

Anyhoo. I think people outside tech overestimate the importance of CEOs and people in tech underestimate it. Without Jobs, Woz probably would have been a really great engineer in some company and you’d never have heard of him at all. He wasn’t a product guy, and you need a product not just raw tech to sell. Selling stuff being somewhat important for a company.

Steve Jobs also had a functioning reality distortion field, something not all that many people have and that’s really important for building a company…

Re:is Apple the only one?

By spacepimp • Score: 4, Informative Thread

HP was started in a garage.

Re:Wozniak - the real reason for Apple

By tlhIngan • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Jobs gets all the accolades and fame but he was just a pushy sociopath in a suit, plenty of others could have done what he did. VERY few could have done what Wozniak did and its a damn shame that not many people outside of the tech world have heard of him.

That is false. Jobs and Wozniak actually are the yin and yang of Apple. Wozniak by himself, left to his own devices, would still be working at HP. Jobs by himself, would have been a has-been engineer. Jobs was actually competent as an engineer (unlike say, other “engineers” like Musk).

Jobs though, was more tuned into the business side of things than the engineering side of things, while Woz was the opposite.

Woz and Jobs got started by making a blue box - Jobs had read about them in the Esquire article, and Woz built one of the first digital blue boxes. Both of them went around Berkeley selling them to college students for $150 or so and they made a few thousand.

Jobs knew about computers, Woz built a computer. Woz was basically giving the Apple I away at the Homebrew Computer Club and it was one among dozens of others doing the same. Jobs had the business acumen to recognize he could do one better and sold it to a computer store and get the production of it going (requiring Woz to sell his HP-35 calculator). They’d build 10 (all they could afford), sell them and use the money to build 20 and so on.

Wpz designed the hardware. Jobs saw the potential and could leverage the confidence he had to not just sell it, but to get it produced - arranging the suppliers to give them 30 days credit.

These days it’s a lot easier since if you want something built, China can handle the production if you meet the minimum order quantity. But back then, it’s not like there was a huge electronics supply chain, production lines, or anything else.

Both Jobs and Woz were soldering Apple Is in that garage too - like I said, Jobs was an OK engineer, but he knew talent. Woz was an excellent engineer, but was happy at HP and didn’t really have the desire to start his own company.

It’s Yin and Yang - you need both, which is how Apple got started. Woz would likely have kept this computer as a nifty prototype then bought a Commodore when they came out a few years later whilst still at HP. Jobs would likely have drifted among various electronics companies (he was at Atari) once the crash happened.

You have to remember Jobs went and found NeXT after Macintosh got the Apple board to oust him. He sold his Apple stock and basically created NeXT. He used the earnings at NeXT to basically backstop Pixar (who was struggling and about to go under) and eventually fund Toy Story.

And he brought the second coming to Apple, recognizing talent in Jony Ives to design a computer so unique everyone knew what it was.

Doesn’t excuse Jobs being an asshole, though. The only redeeming personal quality Jobs had is that he managed his RDF (reality distortion field) to push the people who work for him to do their best work. He was a pain to work for, but if you actually do good, he did reward you to encourage you to do more great work.

Back in the day

By ZipNada • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

I was an electronics technician back in the late 70’s. I had worked for a year or so debugging circuit boards that came off of an assembly line (many parts were soldered on by hand) so I had experience with the simple IC’s and CPU’s of that time. This was rare skill in those days, and I leveraged that to get a job as the technician at a Computerland store that sold Apple II, Commodore Pet, Atari 400, etc. I didn’t know a thing about them at first, but nobody else did either.

We didn’t have circuit diagrams for most of the computers so there was little hope for repairing them, but all the IC’s in the Apple were plugged in to sockets and were removable. I was able to get a diagram that showed which section of the board was responsible for what subsystem - display, keyboard, memory, I/O, etc. This made it possible to set a working machine on a bench next to a broken one and swap IC’s one by one until you reached the defective component. I fixed a lot of Apples that way.

They were hugely expensive. A fully loaded Apple II cost about $2,500 in 1980, which would be about $10,000 in today’s money. But people bought them! I think we sold one or two a week.

Rivian and Lucid Win Right to Sell Their EVs Directly to Buyers in Washington State

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
The Wall Street Journal reports that Rivian “just won a yearslong battle with car dealers in Washington state that threatens the model of how cars are sold.”
After fighting to sell its vehicles directly to buyers, Rivian threatened to take its case to voters with a ballot measure to permit direct sales. The dealers blinked. The state’s dealer lobby not only dropped its opposition to a sales loophole for Rivian and rival EV-maker Lucid, but also encouraged lawmakers to approve one. The measure became law this month…

New auto entrants like Rivian, and Tesla before it, have spent years contending with long-established U.S. state laws that require new cars to be sold through independent franchised dealers. The auto startups — typically makers of EVs — argue that they can offer a better experience by selling directly to consumers, much as Apple sells iPhones through its own stores and online. Rivian CEO RJ Scaringe has said the company is committed to direct-only sales because it’s more profitable and gives the company control over how its vehicles are sold, marketed and maintained. The Washington compromise riled traditional automakers, including General Motors, Ford and Toyota, which lobbied against it, arguing it unfairly advantages startups. A trade group representing the automakers called it discriminatory and argued the exception could one day open the door to Chinese EV makers…

German automaker Volkswagen is currently facing several lawsuits from dealers over its plan to sell new Scout vehicles directly to consumers. Dealers say independent franchises are vital to the car-buying process, creating competition between dealerships that keeps prices affordable for consumers, while providing valuable services such as repairs, warranty work and financing… Yet for Washington’s dealers, the prospect of putting franchise laws up for a popular vote laid bare a tough reality: given the choice, many car buyers want the freedom to avoid dealerships. Rivian’s polling, which the company shared with lawmakers, showed nearly 70% of respondents favored allowing direct sales when asked whether they would support manufacturers selling cars directly to consumers…

The fight comes at a critical time for Rivian, which is launching a new, more affordable SUV in a bid to make consistent profits amid a downturn in U.S. EV sales… Rivian is able to directly sell cars in roughly half of U.S. states, but a number of them limit how many locations the company can operate. They can’t disclose the price, though. For that, customers must go online.
The article notes that “Following the win, Rivian executives are eyeing other states that, like Washington, ban direct sales but also allow ballot initiatives: Arkansas, Ohio, Oklahoma, Montana, Nebraska and South Dakota…” It adds that lawmakers (from both parties) in the state of Washington had said “they have long felt pulled between giving consumers more car-buying freedom and protecting dealers, essentially small-business owners who are vital to local economies — and politically powerful.”

But an executive at the Washington State Auto Dealers Association said dealers supported this new law partly because it protects them by barring future automakers from selling directly in the state, and by requiring Rivian and Lucid to adhere to the same regulations that govern how dealers operate.

Re:The old guard bribed these restrictions

By swillden • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

into place to protect their oligopoly. Some blame it on “socialism” when it’s really crony capitalism.

The correct term is “regulatory capture”. Private businesses use the power of the state to protect, subsidize or otherwise benefit them and harm competitors and potential competitors. It’s extremely common and the more pervasive the regulation is, the more common it is. Red tape and government procedures benefit entrenched players who have built the institutional structures and knowledge to deal with them.

This isn’t to say that all regulation is bad… but a lot of it is. There was never any consumer benefit to banning direct sales. All regulations should be thoroughly scrutinized for their effects on the market, direct and indirect.

Re:Was not expecting them to admit that

By swillden • Score: 5, Informative Thread

>arguing it unfairly advantages startups

Way to say your dealers suck.

They had to say it that way, because the more accurate statement is that the dealership law unfairly advantages existing automakers. It’s not about the dealerships being good or bad, it’s about the fact that setting up a dealership network takes a lot of time and money and requiring it is a good way to keep new competition out.

Another example of US archaism

By shilly • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

The US has fallen behind the rest of the developed world in so many aspects of life due to ossification of structures driven by regulatory capture and fragmentation. Dealerships have been nothing but pernicious for consumers for decades, keeping ICE sales higher than they’d otherwise be, keeping prices higher than they’d otherwise be, etc etc. The rest of the world looks on with incredulity that you find it so difficult to unfuck yourselves.

Re:I live in Washington state

By misnohmer • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
I live in Washington too. I’ve owned many cars, including multiple Teslas between 2013 and 2024. I will tell you that there is no clear winner between direct sales and dealer system. At first (think 2013-2018) Tesla service was amazing, they would bend over backwards to help the early adopters, then then Model 3, and then Model Y came, profitability became the top priority and they wouldn’t even cover a yellowing screen under warranty in a less than one year old six digit priced Model S. I saw people coming with videos of their Model 3’s malfunctioning, and Tesla service saying “we cannot reproduce it, therefore the problem fixed itself”. That is also when I realized that the manufacturer owned service service means there is no competition, so they can charge whatever they want - for example an $8 chip that failed in one of my Teslas causing the main screen no to boot costed $3,000 to fix (eventually there was a NHTSA forced recall, but not when I needed the fix, luckily I am capable of replacing a BGA EMMC part myself, but that is not within an average owner’s capabilities). I now own dealer sold cars, and have to tell you I am getting great service from the dealer (4 cars, 3 different manufacturers), despite the manufacturer’s inadequacies with modern technologies (yea, they suck at software). In the past I’ve owned many dealer sold brands, and my service experience varied. I’ve had some great experiences, and some horrible ones too. I remember long ago having an issue with a 2 year old Honda for which the dealer wanted a bunch of money to resurface the rotors, eventually getting new rotors replaced under Honda warranty, the service guy literally winking at me saying “hey, I gotta try to make money, eh?” (yep, he was Canadian ;-) ). On the other end of the spectrum I had a Lexus once which the dealer was willing to go to mat for me to lemon my car over a bluetooth hands free issue that Lexus (Toyota) was unable to resolve. Lexus actually sent an engineer from Japan to repair the problem (turned out to be a bent pin in one of the harnesses) tp avoid the car getting returned as a lemon.

Bottom line is that direct sales vs. dealer experience does not have a clear cut winner for consumers. I do however strongly believe that both should be allowed by law. This explicit allowing one manufacturer at a time political bribing shit in WA state is just government corruption (happens in other areas to, check out automatic card shufflers allowed in WA as an example, or charter school licenses). I say let people choose, do they wan to buy from a dealer or direct from manufacturer, let he market decide what the people want. Heck, allow the same manufacturer to sell via dealer and direct, see what people choose. I bet such a choice would spurn competition for dealers to show people why it’s worth it buying from them. And yes, I get that it would cost some dealers profits, in situation where they require people to buy a bunch of their cars to qualify for an allocation for a special car (e.g. Porsche 911 GT3 RS), or charge Additional Dealer Markup on top of MSRP (e.g. Corvette).

Sigh

By ledow • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Only in America could you legally argue that an unnecessary profit-making middle-man was legally required and that it would somehow “reduce costs”.

Will Social Media Change After YouTube and Meta’s Court Defeat?

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Yes, this week YouTube and Meta were found negligent in a landmark case about social media addiction.

But “it’s still far from certain what this defeat will change,” argues The Verge‘s senior tech and policy editor, “and what the collateral damage could be.”
If these decisions survive appeal — which isn’t certain — the direct outcome would be multimillion-dollar penalties. Depending on the outcome of several more “bellwether” cases in Los Angeles, a much larger group settlement could be reached down the road… For many activists, the overall goal is to make clear that lawsuits will keep piling up if companies don’t change their business practices…

The best-case outcome of all this has been laid out by people like Julie Angwin, who wrote in The New York Times that companies should be pushed to change “toxic” features like infinite scrolling, beauty filters that encourage body dysmorphia, and algorithms that prioritize “shocking and crude” content. The worst-case scenario falls along the lines of a piece from Mike Masnick at Techdirt, who argued the rulings spell disaster for smaller social networks that could be sued for letting users post and see First Amendment-protected speech under a vague standard of harm. He noted that the New Mexico case hinged partly on arguing that Meta had harmed kids by providing end-to-end encryption in private messaging, creating an incentive to discontinue a feature that protects users’ privacy — and indeed, Meta discontinued end-to-end encryption on Instagram earlier this month.

Blake Reid, a professor at Colorado Law, is more circumspect. “It’s hard right now to forecast what’s going to happen,” Reid told The Verge in an interview. On Bluesky, he noted that companies will likely look for “cold, calculated” ways to avoid legal liability with the minimum possible disruption, not fundamentally rethink their business models. “There are obviously harms here and it’s pretty important that the tort system clocked those harms” in the recent cases, he told The Verge. “It’s just that what comes in the wake of them is less clear to me”.
The article also includes this prediction from legal blogger/Section 230 export Eric Goldman. “There will be even stronger pushes to restrict or ban children from social media.” Goldman argues “This hurts many subpopulations of minors, ranging from LGBTQ teens who will be isolated from communities that can help them navigate their identities to minors on the autism spectrum who can express themselves better online than they can in face-to-face conversations.”

Collateral damage?

By taustin • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Will it cause collateral damage, or will it end (at least some of) it?

Does social media do anything but collateral damage?

Re:Bodes ill for Wikipedia

By martin-boundary • Score: 4, Informative Thread
You’re off base. There are sites that can interest you so much that you feel addicted (the correct word might be infatuated). Then there are sites that are engineered to force universal addiction as fast as possible. That’s Facebook. That’s Meta.

The difference is simple. The former sites are organically addictive to some people. The latter sites are designed by employees who are specifically hired to manipulate all their visitors.

Walk away

By SumDog • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
I don’t like people legislating to big daddy government to put companies in check. Facebook was funded by Peter Thiel and launched the day after DARPA shut down Digital LifeLog (pure coincidence. no connection. promise. move on.) They are meant to be tracking and manipulation platforms for the State.

If you don’t like it, stop using it! I haven’t shopped at Amazon since 2016. The trouble is the mass of people cannot turn away. I don’t blame them I guess. I only deleted all my big social media accounts (FB, Insta, Xitter) ~4 years ago.

I agree with the lawyer who argued this will hurt smaller websites. The UK has effectively destroyed any and all small independent forums. They’re trying to go after websites not even hosted or affiliated with the UK! It’s insane.

Stuff like this could destroy the future of the fediverse.

Six years ago I wrote a proposal for Section 230 reform that I think is relevant:

https://battlepenguin.com/poli…

Children shouldn’t be on social media

By peppepz • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

This hurts many subpopulations of minors, ranging from LGBTQ teens who will be isolated from communities that can help them navigate their identities to minors on the autism spectrum who can express themselves better online than they can in face-to-face conversations.

I call bulllshit on this. Children do not have the maturity that is required for unfiltered access to the adult world, let alone for using a service designed around exploiting human fragilities for commercial exploitation. Sensitive kids, if anything, have a much higher chance of getting hurt by either the addictive mechanism of the service itself or by weirdos they can encounter online than the chance of meeting some “community” that can help them better than their parents or a specialist could. They’ll have plenty of time for navigating after their brain has formed.

It was more Meta/FB that tailored kids…

By bsdetector101 • Score: 3 Thread
Meta/FB and other social media knew what they were doing and still do. Really don’t see it for YouTube.

Is It Time For Open Source to Start Charging For Access?

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“It’s time to charge for access,” argues a new opinion piece at The Register. Begging billion-dollar companies to fund open source projects just isn’t enough, writes long-time tech reporter Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols:
Screw fair. Screw asking for dimes. You can’t live off one-off charity donations… Depending on what people put in a tip jar is no way to fund anything of value… [A]ccording to a 2024 Tidelift maintainer report, 60 percent of open source maintainers are unpaid, and 60 percent have quit or considered quitting, largely due to burnout and lack of compensation. Oh, and of those getting paid, only 26 percent earn more than $1,000 a year for their work. They’d be better paid asking “Would you like fries with that?” at your local McDonald’s…

Some organizations do support maintainers, for example, there’s HeroDevs and its $20 million Open Source Sustainability Fund. Its mission is to pay maintainers of critical, often end-of-life open source components so they can keep shipping patches without burning out. Sentry’s Open Source Pledge/Fund has given hundreds of thousands of dollars per year directly to maintainers of the packages Sentry depends on. Sentry is one of the few vendors that systematically maps its dependency tree and then actually cuts checks to the people maintaining that stack, as opposed to just talking about “giving back.”

Sentry is on to something. We have the Linux Foundation to manage commercial open source projects, the Apache Foundation to oversee its various open source programs, the Open Source Initiative (OSI) to coordinate open source licenses, and many more for various specific projects. It’s time we had an organization with the mission of ensuring that the top programmers and maintainers of valuable open source projects get a cut of the tech billionaire pie.

We must realign how businesses work with open source so that payment is no longer an optional charitable gift but a cost of doing business. To do that, we need an organization to create a viable, supportable path from big business to individual programmer. It’s time for someone to step up and make this happen. Businesses, open source software, and maintainers will all be better off for it.
One possible future… Bruce Perens wrote the original Open Source definition in 1997, and now proposes a not-for-profit corporation developing “the Post Open Collection” of software, distributing its licensing fees to developers while providing services like user support, documentation, hardware-based authentication for developers, and even help with government compliance and lobbying.

Why now?

By thegarbz • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

This has literally been the case now for 40 years, and yet the open source movement is stronger than ever. So why now? Also charging for access? Stallman will rip your balls off.

How economic models work

By shanen • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

This has literally been the case now for 40 years, and yet the open source movement is stronger than ever. So why now? Also charging for access? Stallman will rip your balls off.

Citation needed.

My current citation is Microsoft Secrets by Cusumano and Selby. Kind of old, so maybe someone can say how much things have changed over the years, but the point is that they are too optimized about getting more money. And they dominate the real world.

OSS is “stronger than ever”? In which dimension? I can’t think of one. Even programmer satisfaction.

Me? I’m still hung up on the notion of a better structured charitable approach. Recovering costs, where the costs include appropriate payments for the programming work. The CSB (Charity Share Brokerage) will earn their way be providing project planning and management support. But I’m sure there will never be a CSB and it is too late to even try at this point. Very minor consolation that Microsoft also found project management difficult even back then…

If payment’s required to access open-source sw

By 93 Escort Wagon • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

… then that project is really can’t be described as open source anymore.

Time for a tax.

By pirodude • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Vaughan-Nichols is right about the problem and wrong about the solution. Voluntary pledge funds and tip jars have existed for a decade and the 60% unpaid figure hasn’t moved. Sentry is admirable precisely because it’s an exception, the model doesn’t scale because it depends on individual corporate virtue, which is in shorter supply than VC funding.

Perens’ Post Open licensing approach is interesting but creates a two-tier ecosystem: “free for individuals, pay for commercial use” sounds clean until you realize it breaks the fundamental property that made open source eat the world. The moment a license is commercial-use-restricted, it’s not open source, it’s source-available, and enterprises will treat it accordingly (avoid it, fork it before the license change, or just use the last MIT-licensed version forever).

What’s actually needed: mandatory contribution structured as a fee, not a license restriction. Here’s one way to do it. Small flat fee on all US commercial revenue above $5M (the entire world runs on OSS, everyone pays to maintain it), larger marginal fee on companies whose products directly incorporate OSS. Fees flow into a scoring-based royalty pool: your project’s share is proportional to how much commercial revenue depends on it, revenue-weighted so a hedge fund running its entire risk engine on a niche numerical library counts for more than fifty startups using the same package for weekend side projects. Maintainers register and claim their allocation like music royalties, no government agency decides who gets hired, just checks cut proportional to actual commercial stakes.

The core insight: you can’t solve a collective action problem with voluntary action. You solve it by making the externality visible in the price.

Re:Why now?

By thegarbz • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

LOL. It’s great watching conspiracy theorists bitch about systemd, ignoring the many small attempts to replace the init system with something functional and ignoring why it is that distributions adopted a system that is far easier to use.

I’m not sure how you think charging for access would have stopped the likes of Canonical developing Upstart, or Gentoo developing OpenRC, or the development of launchd, or s6, or the many other alternatives.

I’m sorry someone moved your cheese, but that’s the beauty of open source. You can do your own thing: https://www.linuxfromscratch.o… Now go get started and do a bit less bitching about someone else’s product you are using (I’ll bet without you giving any contribution yourself).

‘Project Hail Mary’: Real Space Science, Real Astrophotography

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Project Hail Mary has now grossed $300.8 million globally after earning another $54.1 million this weekend from 86 markets, reports Variety, noting that after just nine days it’s now Amazon MGM’s highest-grossing film ever.

And last weekend it had the best opening for a “non-franchise” movie in three years, adds the Associated Press — the best since 2023’s Oppenheimer:
Project Hail Mary, which cost nearly $200 million to produce… is on an enviable trajectory. Its second weekend hold was even better than that of Oppenheimer, which collected $46.7 million in its follow-up frame.
But the movie is based on a book by The Martian author Andy Weir, described by one news outlet as “a former software engineer and self-proclaimed ‘lifelong space nerd’… known for his realistic and clear-eyed approach to scientifically technical stories.”
Project Hail Mary has plenty of real science in it, whether it be space mathematics, physics, or astrobiology… The film’s namesake project is even comprised of the space programs of other nations, such as Roscosmos from Russia, the Chinese space program, and the European Space Agency…

The story relies on work NASA has done regarding exoplanets, or planets outside our solar system… [This includes a nearby star named Tau Ceti approximately 12 light years from Earth which is orbited by four planets — two once thought to be in "the habitable zone" where liquid water can exist.] Tau Ceti has long been the setting used by sci-fi authors and storytellers. Isaac Asimov used it for his Robot series. Arthur C. Clarke’s “Rama” spacecraft came across a mysterious tetrahedron in the Tau Ceti system. Authors Ursula K. Le Guin and Kim Stanley Robinson also set stories in Tau Ceti, and it also serves as the extrasolar setting of the 1968 Jane Fonda film Barbarella. Most recently, the Bungie video game Marathon is set in the far-off system, serving as part of the background story for the extraction shooter, about a large-scale plan to colonize the Tau Ceti system.
The movie also mentions 40 Eridani A, according to the article, a real star about 16 light-years away that was said to be orbited by the fictional planet Vulcan, home to Star Trek‘s Mr. Spock. It’s also mentioned in Frank Herbert’s Dune as the star system of the planets Ix and Richese (“noted for their machine culture and miniaturisation,” according to the Stellar Australis site’s “Project Dune” page).

And in a video on IMAX’s YouTube channel, the film’s directors explain how for a crucial scene they used non-visible-light photography, which is also an important part of modern astronomy. “Even the credits incorporate real astrophotography into the final moments,” the article points out, using the work of award-winning Australian astrophotographer Rod Prazeres. “The only difference between his work of capturing space data in images and what ended up on the big screen was that he gave them ‘starless versions’ of his photographs to make it easier to place credit text over them.”

Prazeres wrote on his web site that he was touched the producers “wanted the real thing… In a world where CGI and AI are everywhere, it meant a lot…”

Re:Has Anyone Here Seen It?

By JaredOfEuropa • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Not yet but I’ll go see it soon What makes me really sad though is that being a “non franchise movie” is now enough of a thing for it to be pointed out specifically. All the big productions these days are in some “universe”, part of a franchise, a sequel or prequel or reboot. God forbid a studio dares to allot a blockbuster budget to an original work.

Re: Has Anyone Here Seen It?

By Tomahawk • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
I did and really enjoyed it. Worth seeing in the cinema, imho.

Re: Has Anyone Here Seen It?

By rayzat • Score: 5, Informative Thread
I saw it and was very much entertained. It remained true to the book but can also stand on it’s own.

Re:AI Editor Slop

By EditorDavid • Score: 5, Informative Thread
Nice to see you commenting, Jak! (I haven’t seen the movie, so I’m glad someone did and weighed in on whether it’s worth seeing.)

I’ve updated that sentence so it describes 40 Eridani A as “mentioned in Frank Herbert’s Dune as the home of Ix and Richese (“noted for their machine culture and miniaturisation,” according to the Stellar Australis site’s “Project Dune” page). Hope that’s more informative for you than the original version (which was taken straight from the original article). No AI involved — and I wasn’t dictating it [on] a phone while walking in the market either. :)

Re:Has Anyone Here Seen It?

By dskoll • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Yes, I saw it. I also read the book. I preferred the book, but I also enjoyed the movie a lot..

The movie was quite faithful to the book, and even though it was a long movie (over 2.5 hours) it didn’t seem long and it moved along quite nicely. The alien creature was pretty much exactly what I had pictured while I was reading the book, and they did a good job imbuing it with personality.

I think the movie was worth seeing in a movie theatre.

World’s Smallest QR Code - Smaller Than Bacteria - Could Store Data for Centuries

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“Scientists have created a microscopic QR code so tiny it can only be seen with an electron microscope,” reports Science Daily. It’s “smaller than most bacteria and now officially a world record.”

“But this isn’t just about size; it’s about durability. By engraving data into ultra-stable ceramic materials, the team has opened the door to storing information that could last for centuries or even millennia without needing power or maintenance.”
Scientists at TU Wien, working with data storage company Cerabyte, produced a QR code measuring just 1.98 square micrometers… officially confirmed and recorded in the Guinness Book of Records…

Each pixel measures just 49 nanometers, which is about ten times smaller than the wavelength of visible light. As a result, the pattern is completely invisible under normal conditions and cannot be resolved using visible light. However, when viewed with an electron microscope, the QR code can be clearly and reliably read. The storage capacity is also impressive. More than 2 terabytes of data could fit within the area of a single A4 sheet of paper using this approach…

This work points toward a more sustainable future for data storage, where information can be preserved securely for the long term with minimal energy use.
“We live in the information age, yet we store our knowledge in media that are astonishingly short-lived,” says Alexander Kirnbaue (from the thin film materials science division at Vienna’s Tu Wein research university). “With ceramic storage media, we are pursuing a similar approach to that of ancient cultures, whose inscriptions we can still read today…”

“We now aim to use other materials, increase writing speeds, and develop scalable manufacturing processes so that ceramic data storage can be used not only in laboratories but also in industrial applications.”

What about the future?

By InterGuru • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
Who says that future generations will have electron microscopes or the ability to read QR codes. Lots of technology is lost when civilizations collapse. In the future we might not even realize that the ceramic chip contains any information.

I can get 10% off next purchase next century!

By bussdriver • Score: 4, Funny Thread

I hope the webserver is still working.

Re: accelerated aging test not yet completed

By SnotMelon • Score: 5, Informative Thread
It’s not a black material printed onto white ceramic, it just looks like that from the electron microscope image. They used ion beam etching to engraved the qr code into a flat ceramic surface. Assuming it’s not subject to weathering it should last a pretty long time given what’s know about ancient ceramics.

Prior Art

By SlashbotAgent • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Hieroglyphs on pottery shards.

But, the tiny size does open up a lot of opportunities for tracking information and any and every product.

Re:What about the future? [deciphering]

By Tablizer • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Zork the Cockroach: “What the fuck is ‘rick-rolling’?”

This Friendly Robot Just Installed 100 MW of Solar Power

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Utility-scale solar construction… by robots! It’s “one of the largest real-world demonstrations,” notes Electrek, with 100 MW of capacity installed by the “Maximo” robots from AES, one of the world’s top power companies.

Maximo uses AI “to automate the heavy lifting of solar panels and accelerate solar installation,” according to their web page, which shows a video of Maximo at work installing a vast field of solar panels in Kern County, California. With assistance from Nvidia, the Maximo team could “develop, test and refine robotic capabilities through physics-based simulation and AI driven modeling before deploying updates in the field,” reports Electrek, and they’re aiming for a full GW of solar generating capacity:
After completing the first half of the Bellefield complex last summer, Maximo engineers went into a higher gear, with the latest version 3.0 robots consistently surpassing an installation rate of one module per minute, with construction crews installing as many as 24 solar panel modules per hour, per person. If that sounds fast, that’s because it is. At full tilt, the latest Maximo robot-equipped crews have nearly doubled the output of traditional installation methods at similar solar locations throughout Southern California.

“Reaching 100 MW is an important milestone for Maximo and for the role robotics can play in solar construction,” explains Chris Shelton, president of Maximo. “It demonstrates that field robotics can move beyond experimentation and deliver consistent results at utility scale. As solar deployment continues to accelerate globally, technologies that improve installation speed, quality and reliability will become increasingly important....”

Like just about every other business that demands a high degree of physical labor, the construction industry is facing huge labor shortages, making machines like Maximo that provide real efficiency gains welcome additions to the job site.
“The combination of AI, vision, robotics and simulation driven engineering reduced development and validation timelines,” the Maximo team said in a statement, “and increased confidence in field performance as the robotic fleet scaled.”

Re: Looks like a robotic arm on a rail

By SuperDre • Score: 4, Informative Thread
What rails? This robot has tracks like a mini excavator, so it can drive anywhere. And yeah it is the same type of industrial robot, but not on a fixed position with a fixed power supply you can run 24/7. So the robot has to deal with uneven surfaces and distances from the solarpanel mountrail.

NOT friendly.

By Gravis Zero • Score: 5, Funny Thread

I was so proud of this robot that I went up and gave it a hug. Everyone around me started yelling at me to get away and then the robot tried to install a solar panel on me. Long story short, I ended up in the hospital with a restraining order against to stay away from the robot.

THIS ROBOT IS NOT FRIENDLY.

Re: Looks like a robotic arm on a rail

By jsonn • Score: 4, Informative Thread
Properly installed PV panels don’t ruin nature, they can actually help nature. Most plants don’t like full solar power all day and prefer shades. Same for animals.

Re: Looks like a robotic arm on a rail

By SnotMelon • Score: 5, Informative Thread
If you check the location of this installation you’ll find it’s right next to Mojave, so pretty much desert not productive farmland. I’m not saying that’s always the case but they are usually sited in areas where farming isn’t possible, or marginal, not on prime agricultural land.

Re: Looks like a robotic arm on a rail

By WaffleMonster • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Solar panels on deserts are regreening them so they are cooling not heating.

Sand reflects about 70% of solar energy, solar panels reflect about 10% plus another 20% in harvested energy which still leaves you with twice the amount of absorbed energy vs sand.

Greening occurs due to reduced surface temperatures / evaporation due to panel shading.

Bluesky’s Newest Product: an AI Tool That Gives You Custom Feeds

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“What happens when you can describe the social experience you want and have it built for you…?” asks Bluesky? “We’ve just started experimenting, but we’re sharing it now because we want you to build alongside us.”

Called “Attie” — because it’s built with Bluesky’s decentralized publishing framework, AT Protocol (which is open source) — the new assistant turns natural language prompts into social feeds, without users having to know how to code. (It’s part of Bluesky’s mission to “develop and drive large-scale adoption of technologies for open and decentralized public conversation.”)

Engadget reports:
On the Attie website, examples include prompts like, “Show me electronic music and experimental sound from people in my network” or “Builders working on agent infrastructure and open protocol design.”

“It feels more like having a conversation than configuring software,” [writes Bluesky’s former CEO/current chief innovation officer, Jay Graber, in a blog post]. “You describe the sort of posts you want to see, and the coding agent builds the feed you described.”

Graber added that Attie is a separate app from Bluesky and users don’t have to use the new AI assistant if they don’t want to. However, since Attie and Bluesky were built on the same framework, it could mean there will be some cross-app implementation between the two or any other app built on the AT Protocol.
“Attie is open for beta signups today, and we’ll be sharing what we learn along the way,” Graber writes in the blog post. “To learn more about Attie, visit: Attie.AI. Come help us find out what this can be.”

The blog post warns that “Right now, AI is undermining human agency at the same time it’s enhancing it,” since “The proliferation of low-quality AI-generated content is making public social networks noisier and less trustworthy…” And in a world where “signal is getting harder to find… The major platforms aren’t trying to fix this problem.”
They’re using AI to increase the time users spend on-platform, to harvest training data, and to shape what users see and believe through systems they can’t inspect and didn’t choose. We think AI should serve people, not platforms…

An open protocol puts this power directly in users’ hands. You can use it to build your own feeds, create software that works the way you want it to, and find signal in the noise. We built the AT Protocol so anyone could build any app they imagine on top of it, but until recently “anyone” really meant “anyone who can code.” Agentic coding tools change that. For the first time, an open protocol can be genuinely open to everyone…

The Atmosphere [Bluesky’s interoperable ecosystem] is an open data layer with a clearly defined schema for applications, which makes it uniquely well-suited for coding agents to build on… Bluesky will continue to evolve as a social app millions of people rely on. Attie will be where we experiment with agentic social.

AI is an accelerant on whatever it’s applied to. I want it to accelerate decentralizing social and putting power back in users’ hands. But I don’t think the most interesting things built on AT Protocol will come from us. They’re going to come from everyone who picks up these tools and starts building.

Third Party Tooling

By Himmy32 • Score: 4, Informative Thread
The previous custom feed first party custom feed generator was a pain, but there’s already third party tools that are already pretty easy to use without needing the AI buzzword. Skyfeed and Bluesky Feed Creator are pretty nice.

Unnecessary

By jrnvk • Score: 3, Insightful Thread

Bluesky is already a monolith of a certain viewpoint, these tools cannot possibly change that experience any.

Re:Hmm…

By Himmy32 • Score: 5, Informative Thread

RSS feeds never went away, here’s even the link to the Slashdot RSS feed. There’s some RSS feed aggregators, but just like you pointed out with Slashdot the RSS sources aren’t some sort of neutral panacea. Because no matter who is producing information will have a bias.

Bluesky is oddly better than most in that regard because the open protocol with the feed and filter system allows to pick feeds or create your own in order to have control over your own experience. And with that power comes the same power as other social media to live in the echo chamber of your choice. But in addition to that, there’s also the ability to filter out the political echo chambers and just get a feed on a fandom, hobby, or obscure topic. Won’t even have a CEO forcing their politics into your feed.

Re:Custom feeds of garbage

By Himmy32 • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
Oddly enough, the feed and filter system being discussed also allows for an equally echo-y right wing experience, if you desire that. Their may be less right wing voices but they aren’t absent and could be filtered for.

Re:Custom feeds of garbage

By Himmy32 • Score: 4, Informative Thread

The moderation is also customizable. There’s also community moderation and you could subscribe to your own moderation service.

As for the default moderation service which does skew left, the default setting on the “Intolerance” moderation category is “Warn”. So even when moderated, those views aren’t blocked and you can turn the settings on that category.

So again with a very few minor tweaks, you could use the service in the way you desire. Unless that conduct is rising to the level to that violates the Anti-Harassment Community Guideline.

Amazon Gambles on $4B Push Into America’s Rural Areas, May Soon Carry More Parcels Than USPS

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
In many rural areas, America’s online shoppers can wait half a week or more for deliveries. But Amazon started a $4 billion “rural delivery push” last year, reports Bloomberg, and has now cut delivery times to under 24 hours for 1 in 5 rural and small-town households, with 48-hour delivery to 62% of rural households.
The payoff could be huge. Rural shoppers in the US collectively spend $1 trillion a year on clothing, electronics, household goods and other items, representing about 20% of retail purchases excluding cars and gasoline, according to Morgan Stanley. Amazon aims to recondition those shoppers to expect quick delivery, which would play to its strengths and make the company top-of-mind for online purchases… “Rural America is often overlooked,” said Sky Canaves, an analyst at EMarketer Inc. who tracks online sales. “This is the opportunity Amazon is trying to seize because e-commerce growth is getting harder to come by....”

Amazon’s rural push will require a lot more rural business owners willing to make deliveries… Today, Amazon delivers more parcels overall than UPS and FedEx, which are both shedding workers and shrinking their delivery networks, including in rural areas. By picking up the slack, Amazon is expected to become the largest parcel carrier in the US — surpassing the postal service — in 2028, according to the shipping software company Pitney Bowes. Amazon currently delivers two of three orders itself. For rural shoppers, the most visible change will be fewer brown UPS trucks, fewer packages delivered by mail carriers and more small business owners pulling up in their minivans.
Amazon’s relationship with America’s postal service “has become rocky following a dispute over contract terms,” notes the Wall Street Journal. But they also share an interesting calculation by Marc Wulfraat, president of MWPVL International, a supply-chain consultancy monitoring the e-commerce company’s logistics network. . At Amazon’s current pace of constructing 40 to 50 new delivery hubs each year, he estimates Amazon will be able to ship packages to every single U.S. ZIP Code within four years.

Re:It pays off

By ArchieBunker • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Yep. Hamstring the USPS so your rich buddies can privatize it.

Re:Can Amazon find DSPs in the most rural of rural

By PPH • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

First, as someone else stated, a DSP is generally a business. Not an individual. That said, I do know some people who have incorporated themselves just to get around the whole “We deal with businesses, not individuals” rules.

But then, it comes down to what contract terms Amazon offers DSPs. Certainly, nobody in their right mind* is going to partner with Amazon for a price that won’t cover their expenses. Rural areas with high fuel costs per delivery will bid more for their service. Or not sign up. Amazon, if they are not dumb as rocks, will add this variable cost to the bottom line of each purchase. After all, they are not the USPS with universal service written into law.

*Uber/Lyft will make a liar out of me. There are people living on the edge of poverty for the opportunity to buy a car, insurance, fuel and maintenance just to chauffeur some zoomers around.

Re:It pays off

By quonset • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Delivery vehicles are small.

They were in the process of being replaced with larger vehicles, most of which would be electric. The postal carriers who got to the drive the new ones raved about how comfortable they were, how large they were, and importantly, had air conditioning. I said were because his Orangeness wanted all the vehicles removed even if meant paying a $1.5 billion penalty to clear everything out.

Fortunately, Republicans tripped themselves up because the bill they put this provision into needed a 60 vote majority, not a simple majority. Needless to say, no more of these vehicles will be purchased.

Apple Now Requires Device-Level Age Verification in the UK. Could the US Be Next?

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot
Apple unveiled new device-level age restrictions in the UK on Wednesday. “After downloading a new update, users will now have to confirm that they are 18 or older to access unrestricted features,” reports Gizmodo.

“Users will be able to confirm their age with a credit card or by scanning an ID.”
For those underage or who have not confirmed their age, Apple will turn on Web Content Filter and Communication Safety, which will not only restrict access to certain apps or websites, but will also monitor messages, shared photo albums, AirDrop, and FaceTime calls for nudity. Apple didn’t specify exactly which services and features are banned for under-18 users, but it will likely be in compliance with UK legislation…

The British government does not require Apple and other OS providers to institute device-level age checks, but it does restrict minor access to online pornography under the Online Safety Act, which passed in 2023. So far, that restriction has only been implemented at the website level, but UK officials have been worried about easy loopholes to evade the age restrictions, like VPNs.

The broader tech industry has been campaigning for some time to use device-level age checks instead in response to the rising tide of under-16 social media and internet bans around the world. Last month, in a landmark social media trial in California, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg also supported this idea, saying that conducting age verification “at the level of the phone is just a lot clearer than having every single app out there have to do this separately.” Pornhub-operator Aylo had advocated for device-level restrictions in the UK as well, and even sent out letters to Apple, Google, and Microsoft in November asking for OS-level age verification…

The most obvious question: Could this be brought stateside?

Will, not could, come to the USA

By dskoll • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

A large number of states, including California, Colorado, Illinois and New York, have already passed or are passing stupid device age-attestation laws like this one. These laws purport to apply to just about any OS on any general-purpose computing device, if the device is capable of downloading software. If the laws are not fought, it means open-source is in trouble and mass surveillance will become the norm.

The most obvious question

By MpVpRb • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Does it work?
Kids are smart and really good at finding workarounds
The likely outcome is political theater, where politicians claim success while kids get creative
The other likely outcome is annoyance and failure when the tech goes wrong

Re:Will, not could, come to the USA

By Powercntrl • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Texas tried it long before these states, but its law was put on hold by a judge. Utah and Louisiana are also trying to pass or have passed age-verification laws.

Texas’s age check law for porn sites was upheld by the SCOTUS, though. I was following it closely because I’m in Florida and we have a similar law.

Honestly, anyone trying to make this into a single-sided partisan issue is just posting genuine flamebait, because age gate laws are being pushed by both sides of the political spectrum.

Device level will not work

By Frissysan • Score: 3 Thread
I suppose it could work for a phone, but other devices can have multiple users. It would be much better done at the account level.

Re:Google Pixel

By unixisc • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Yeah, this law is more about getting rid of online anonymity than ensuring that kids are not online. For the latter, parents are already responsible for that, and it’s up to them to ensure that their kids don’t live on their phones or computers. Only point in passing such a law is so that one can trace who posts what online, particularly if one is stupid enough to use their subscription accounts to access social media