Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Microsoft Mitigated the Largest Cloud DDoS Ever Recorded, 15.7 Tbps
  2. An AI Podcasting Machine Is Churning Out 3,000 Episodes a Week
  3. NetChoice Sues Virginia To Block Its One-Hour Social Media Limit For Kids
  4. Tech Giants’ Cloud Power Probed As EU Weighs Inclusion In DMA
  5. ‘Buy Now, Pay Later’ is Expanding Fast, and That Should Worry Everyone
  6. Harvard Has Almost Half a Billion Dollars in Crypto
  7. Is Video Watching Bad for Kids? The Effect of Video Watching on Children’s Skills
  8. Iran Begins Cloud Seeding To Induce Rain Amid Historic Drought
  9. AI Use in ‘Call of Duty: Black Ops 7’ Draws Fire From US Lawmaker
  10. Take-Two CEO Says Consoles Aren’t Going Away, But Gaming is Moving Toward PCs
  11. UK Cyber Ransom Ban Risks Collapse of Essential Services
  12. Global Web Freedoms Tumble
  13. Why Hotel-Room Cancellations Disappeared
  14. Anthropic CEO Says He’s ‘Deeply Uncomfortable’ With Unelected Tech Elites Shaping AI
  15. Florida Bill Would Require Cursive Instruction in Elementary Schools

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Microsoft Mitigated the Largest Cloud DDoS Ever Recorded, 15.7 Tbps

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Security Affairs:
On October 24, 2025, Azure DDoS Protection detected and mitigated a massive multi-vector attack peaking at 15.72 Tbps and 3.64 billion pps, the largest cloud DDoS ever recorded, aimed at a single Australian endpoint. Azure’s global protection network filtered the traffic, keeping services online. The attack came from the Aisuru botnet, a Turbo Mirai-class IoT botnet using compromised home routers and cameras.

The attack used massive UDP floods from more than 500,000 IPs hitting a single public address, with little spoofing and random source ports that made traceback easier. It highlights how attackers are scaling with the internet: faster home fiber and increasingly powerful IoT devices keep pushing DDoS attack sizes higher.
“On October 24, 2025, Azure DDOS Protection automatically detected and mitigated a multi-vector DDoS attack measuring 15.72 Tbps and nearly 3.64 billion packets per second (pps). This was the largest DDoS attack ever observed in the cloud and it targeted a single endpoint in Australia,” reads a report published by Microsoft. “The attack originated from Aisuru botnet.”

“Attackers are scaling with the internet itself. As fiber-to-the-home speeds rise and IoT devices get more powerful, the baseline for attack size keeps climbing,” concludes the post. “As we approach the upcoming holiday season, it is essential to confirm that all internet-facing applications and workloads are adequately protected against DDOS attacks.”

An AI Podcasting Machine Is Churning Out 3,000 Episodes a Week

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
fjo3 shares a report from TheWrap:
There are already at least 175,000 AI-generated podcast episodes on platforms like Spotify and Apple. That’s thanks to Inception Point AI, a startup with just eight employees cranking out 3,000 episodes a week covering everything from localized weather reports and pollen trackers to a detailed account of Charlie Kirk’s assassination and its cultural impact, to a biography series on Anna Wintour. Its podcasting network Quiet Please has generated 12 million lifetime episode downloads and amassed 400,000 subscribers — so, yes, people are really listening to AI podcasts.

Inception Point CEO Jeanine Wright believes the tool is proof that automation can make podcasting scalable, profitable and accessible without human writers, editors or hosts. “The price is now so inexpensive that you can take a lot of risks,â Wright told TheWrap. âoeYou can make a lot of content and a lot of different genres that were never commercially viable before and serve huge audiences that have really never had content made for them.” At a cost of $1 an episode, Wright takes a quantity-over-quality approach.
“I think very quickly we get to a place where AI is a default way that content is made, not just across audio, but across television and film and commercials and imagery, and everything. And then we will disclose when things are not made with AI instead of that they were made with AI,” Wright said. “But for now, we are perfectly happy leading the way.”

The real gift of todays AI just might be

By oldgraybeard • Score: 3 Thread
to bury anything of value in immense piles of AI slop.

New Icon Time

By newcastlejon • Score: 3 Thread
Can we please have a new story icon for AI slop?

trash is still trash

By oldgraybeard • Score: 3 Thread
“a place where AI is a default way that content is made” One thing is sure! Using AI will not enhance the quality, just the quantity.

NetChoice Sues Virginia To Block Its One-Hour Social Media Limit For Kids

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
NetChoice is suing Virginia to block a new law that limits kids under 16 to one hour of daily social media use unless parents approve more time, arguing the rule violates the First Amendment and introduces serious privacy risks through mandatory age-verification. The Verge reports:
In addition to restricting access to legal speech, NetChoice alleges that Virginia’s incoming law (SB 854) will require platforms to verify user ages in ways that would pose privacy and security risks. The law requires platforms to use “commercially reasonable methods,” which it says include a screen that prompts the user to enter a birth date. However, NetChoice argues that Virginia could go beyond this requirement, citing a post from Governor Youngkin on X, stating “platforms must verify age,” potentially referring to stricter methods, like having users submit a government ID or other personal information.

NetChoice, which is backed by tech giants like Meta, Google, Amazon, Reddit, and Discord, alleges that the law puts a burden on minors’ ability to engage or consume speech online. “The First Amendment prohibits the government from placing these types of restrictions on accessing lawful and valuable speech, just in the same way that the government can’t tell you how long you could spend reading a book, watching a television program, or consuming a documentary,” Paul Taske, the co-director of the Netchoice Litigation Center, tells The Verge.

“Virginia must leave the parenting decisions where they belong: with parents,” Taske says. “By asserting that authority for itself, Virginia not only violates its citizens’ rights to free speech but also exposes them to increased risk of privacy and security breaches.”

I hope NetChoice wins

By markdavis • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

>“NetChoice is suing Virginia to block a new law that limits kids under 16 to one hour of daily social media use unless parents approve more time, arguing the rule violates the First Amendment and introduces serious privacy risks through mandatory age-verification.”

I hope NetChoice wins. These laws popping up in various states absolute put ridiculous burdens on “social media” when that responsibility should be on the parents. And those burdens will DESTROY privacy of everyone, most importantly adults. We should not have to supply PROOF POSITIVE of our identities to use websites. And that is exactly what most of these laws indirectly require.

You can hand-wave and try to invent in your mind some type of “age only” verification, third-party, trust whatever that acts as a middle-man. It is already too late. And I doubt it would actually be trust-worthy.

And have you read the bill? It doesn’t even DEFINE what “social media” is. The only part of the bill I agree with is this:

“For purposes of this section, any controller or processor that operates a social media platform shall treat a user as a minor if the user’s device communicates or signals that the user is or shall be treated as a minor”

In most cases, that shouldn’t be needed, since children should be using locked devices that access only white-listed-sites/apps. Still, it could be useful for older children, where some sites could be appropriate if they have specific age-related/sensitive controls. Plus any voluntary tools to help parents control children’s devices, I support.

Tech Giants’ Cloud Power Probed As EU Weighs Inclusion In DMA

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Bloomberg:
Amazon Web Services, Microsoft’s Azure, and Alphabet’s Google Cloud risk being dragged into the scope of the European Union’s crackdown on Big Tech as antitrust watchdogs prepare to study the platforms’ market power. The European Commission wants to decide if any of the trio should face a raft of new restrictions under the bloc’s Digital Markets Act (source paywalled; alternative source), according to people familiar with the matter who spoke on condition of anonymity. The plan for a market probe follows several major outages in the cloud industry that wrought havoc across global services, highlighting the risks of relying on a mere handful of players.

To date, the world’s largest cloud providers have avoided the DMA because a large part of their business comes via enterprise contracts, making it difficult to count the number of individual users, one of the EU’s main benchmarks for earmarking Silicon Valley services for extra oversight. Under the investigation’s remit, regulators will asses whether the top cloud operators — regardless of the challenge of counting user numbers — should be forced to contend with a raft of fresh obligations including increased interoperability with rival software and better data portability for users, as well as restrictions on tying and bundling.

‘Buy Now, Pay Later’ is Expanding Fast, and That Should Worry Everyone

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader shares a report:
When Nigel Morris tells you he’s worried about the economy, you listen. As industry observers know, Morris co-founded Capital One and pioneered lending to subprime borrowers, building an empire on understanding exactly how much financial stress the average American can handle. Now, as an early investor in Klarna and other buy-now-pay-later companies like Aplazo in Mexico, he’s watching something that makes him deeply uncomfortable.

“To see that people are using [BNPL services] to buy something as basic and fundamental as groceries,” Morris told me on stage at Web Summit in Lisbon this week, “I think is a pretty clear indication that a lot of people are struggling.” The statistics back up his unease. Buy-now-pay-later services have exploded to 91.5 million users in the United States, according to the financial services firm Empower, with 25% using the services to finance their groceries as of earlier this year, according to survey data released in late October by lending marketplace Lending Tree.

These aren’t discretionary purchases — the designer bags and latest Apple headphones that BNPL was marketed for originally. Borrowers aren’t paying it all back, either. According to Lending Tree, default rates are accelerating: 42% of BNPL users made at least one late payment in 2025, up from 39% in 2024 and 34% in 2023.

Article mentions no useful details

By Echoez • Score: 4, Informative Thread

The article (as far as I can tell) provides no breakdown on who is using BNPL. Nothing about age, gender, level of education, region, etc.

The quote about “using this for groceries” seems to come from self-reported surveys. (Whereas these companies should have exact insight into what the loans are actually financing, so there should be no reason for surveys). People might be self-reporting groceries because they don’t want to admit using it to pay for inessential items.

I wonder if this is being driven by YOLO youthful idiocy, not realizing that these loans will have to be paid back OR they will suffer credit issues down the line when financing a house or car. But this article is extremely light on any type of useful details beyond that headline number of 91.5 million in the USA. That seems pretty insane as that is 1 in 4 people in the USA.

Re:We’ve seen this pattern before.

By fuzzyfuzzyfungus • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
That’s only very partially true. The uptick in unpaid mortgages gave the house of cards a little tap; but it was the giant pile of increasingly exotic leverage constructed on top of the relatively boring retail debt that actually gave the situation enough punch to be systemically dangerous; along with the elaborate securitizing, slicing, and trading making it comparatively cumbersome for people to just renegotiate a mortgage headed toward delinquency and take a relatively controlled writedown; rather than just triggering a repossession that left them with a bunch of real estate they weren’t well equipped to sell.

Re:BNPL groceries = groceries on credit cards

By pauljlucas • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
I assume you mean buying groceries using credit cards and not paying off the balance in full thus paying interest. Personally, I buy everything including groceries using a credit card (via Apple Pay) and always pay off the balance in full. It’s easier than dealing with cash and coins.

Re:BNPL groceries = groceries on credit cards

By dysmal • Score: 4 Thread

I’d love to see what else is on the CC bills for people that are buying essentials on credit. I’m not trying to deflect from a very real issue but more information is needed to paint the true picture.

I know a number of people under water with CC debt and are charging their groceries. I want to feel bad for them but then they are also charging starbucks 6 days a week, gas for their trucks, 4-5 streaming services, and also door dash a couple of days a week. Toss in a new iPhone/airpods/tablet throughout the year. They blame their CC bills being high on car repairs and refuse to acknowledge that they’re dieing the death by a thousand cuts.

It sucks that people like this are more common than not because they’re eclipsing the faction of people that are legit screwed and are in an awful situation like this.

Re:Nah

By Pascoea • Score: 4 Thread
This does not compute. You’re presumably using your phone to complete this transaction? I can literally take my phone out of my pocket, unlock it with a thumb print, and wave it at the card reader to pay via my debit card. If you’re ordering online the checkout process is identical enough enough using PayPal, Venmo, or a stored card. I would have to assume Klarna is the exact same number of steps?

Harvard Has Almost Half a Billion Dollars in Crypto

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader shares a report:
Harvard is ramping up its holdings in cryptocurrency. The nation’s oldest university reported a $443 million investment in BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust in the third quarter. The school now holds 6.8 million shares of the exchange-traded fund, up from 1.9 million in the second quarter.

The digital currency amounts to a little less than 1% of the school’s $57 billion endowment. Other schools are bullish on crypto as well. Brown University reported holding $13 million of the BlackRock bitcoin ETF in the second quarter and Emory University reported holding $20 million of Grayscale’s Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF as of March.

$443MM

By bugs2squash • Score: 3 Thread

$320MM

$205MM

$136MM

Is Video Watching Bad for Kids? The Effect of Video Watching on Children’s Skills

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
Abstract of a paper on NBER:
This paper documents video consumption among school-aged children in the U.S. and explores its impact on human capital development. Video watching is common across all segments of society, yet surprisingly little is known about its developmental consequences. With a bunching identification strategy, we find that an additional hour of daily video consumption has a negative impact on children’s noncognitive skills, with harmful effects on both internalizing behaviors (e.g., depression) and externalizing behaviors (e.g., social difficulties). We find a positive effect on math skills, though the effect on an aggregate measure of cognitive skills is smaller and not statistically significant. These findings are robust and largely stable across most demographics and different ways of measuring skills and video watching. We find evidence that for Hispanic children, video watching has positive effects on both cognitive and noncognitive skills — potentially reflecting its role in supporting cultural assimilation. Interestingly, the marginal effects of video watching remain relatively stable regardless of how much time children spend on the activity, with similar incremental impacts observed among those who watch very little and those who watch for many hours.

It depends

By SuperDre • Score: 3 Thread
It depends what they watch, but I see my little nephew (10 years) watch a lot of youtube, but only shorts, and that’s a problem as he doesn’t have the attention to watch anything longer as 20 minutes. So by only letting them always watch shorts, you create a problem. I was raised with watching TV, half hour and hour long shows, but also longer movies.

Iran Begins Cloud Seeding To Induce Rain Amid Historic Drought

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
Authorities in Iran have sprayed clouds with chemicals to induce rain, in an attempt to combat the country’s worst drought in decades. From a report:
Known as cloud-seeding, the process was conducted over the Urmia lake basin on Saturday, Iran’s official news agency Irna reported. Urmia is Iran’s largest lake, but has largely dried out leaving a vast salt bed. Further operations will be carried out in east and west Azerbaijan, the agency said.

Rainfall is at record lows and reservoirs are nearly empty. Last week President Masoud Pezeshkian warned that if there is not enough rainfall soon, Tehran’s water supply could be rationed and people may be evacuated from the capital. Cloud seeding involves injecting chemical salts including silver or potassium iodide into clouds via aircraft or through generators on the ground. Water vapour can then condense more easily and turn into rain. The technique has been around for decades, and the UAE has used it in recent years to help address water shortages. Iran’s meteorological organisation said rainfall had decreased by about 89% this year compared with the long-term average, Irna reported.

Re:Kind of like

By caseih • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Not really. Cloud seeding happens in the US and Canada every year on a large scale. Usually it’s done by insurance companies to reduce damages from hail storms by getting storms to rain out before hail can develop. And it does work but that is not always a good thing. In fact farmers in North Dakota have been calling for years for cloud seeding to be banned because what ends up happening is a big storm will come up but before it can advance across their farms, cloud seeding will cause it to all rain out in one area, rather than bring rain to a wider area. That’s kind of the whole problem with weather modification. It does work but a net positive in one area might end up being a net negative over a wider area, or farther away.

Iran sabotaged their own water system

By TheMiddleRoad • Score: 3 Thread

https://www.wsj.com/opinion/ha…

Use archive.is if you can’t figure it out otherwise.

Re:Kind of like

By wakeboarder • Score: 4 Thread

From Wikipedia:
Despite decades of research and application, cloud seeding’s effectiveness remains a subject of debate among scientists, with studies offering mixed results on its impact on precipitation enhancement, according to a report issued by the US Government Accountability Office in December 2024.[10] Whether cloud seeding is effective in producing a statistically significant increase in precipitation has been a matter of academic debate, with contrasting results depending on the study in question and contrasting opinion among experts.

Which is pretty much where we are at with essential oils

Desalination

By flyingfsck • Score: 3, Interesting Thread
For the foreseeable future, there is enough water in the Caspian sea to desalinate. If they would just stop playing with nuclear centrifuges and build some pumps and pipelines instead.

AI Use in ‘Call of Duty: Black Ops 7’ Draws Fire From US Lawmaker

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader shares a report:
The use of AI in the latest Call of Duty has prompted a US lawmaker to call for regulations to prevent artificial intelligence from taking jobs away from human workers. Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), who represents a large swathe of Silicon Valley, took aim at Call of Duty: Black Ops 7 after buyers noticed the popular shooter contains a significant amount of AI-generated icons, posters, and achievements. Gamers are criticizing it as filled with “AI slop.”

On Friday, Khanna tweeted: “We need regulations that prevent companies from using AI to eliminate jobs to extract greater profits.” He added, “Artists at these companies need to have a say in how AI is deployed. They should share in the profits. And there should be a tax on mass displacement.”

It’s about time!

By ranton • Score: 5, Funny Thread

I have been complaining for 30 years that game companies have used AI to drive the decisions of dishonestly named “non-player characters” instead of employing real human beings to play against the people buying their games. Billions of jobs have been lost over the decades!

Regulations?

By thegarbz • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

So many stupid things in America need regulations, but you’re going to go for the tools that companies use for protectionist activities?

What next? Ban photoshop and force photographers to use a dark room?
Let’s ban pizza ovens that use a conveyor belt, after all some poor kid is out of a job on account of Pizza Hut being able to make pizzas faster that way.
Maybe let’s ban those tubes that they use to speed up the picking up of tennis balls after training.

I’m against AI slop as much as anyone, and in general a fan of regulation, but this really is something that should be solved by the market. If people don’t want AI slop, let them not buy it. Go put regulations on how you produce food, and maybe get some real road safety again instead of this pointless bullshit.

Change happens, get over it

By schwit1 • Score: 3 Thread

What Everyone Is Getting Wrong About AI And Jobs

No laws or or other words on a piece of paper are going to stop companies from outsourcing to AI.

People need to learn what new jobs AI is going to enable and get skilled in those areas.

Going for gold…

By MpVpRb • Score: 3 Thread

…in the olympics of stupid ideas
Lawmakers are dangerously clueless about tech

Take-Two CEO Says Consoles Aren’t Going Away, But Gaming is Moving Toward PCs

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
Strauss Zelnick, CEO of Take-Two Interactive, which operates publishing labels including GTA-maker Rockstar Games and 2K, said on Monday that although gaming consoles are not going away, the industry is moving toward PCs in the next decade. From a report:
“I think it’s moving towards PC and business is moving towards open rather than closed,” Zelnick told CNBC’s “Squawk Box.”

“But if you define console as the property, not the system, then the notion of a very rich game that you engage in for many hours that you play on a big screen — that’s never going away.” Zelnick said the current split between console and mobile is about even in the market, but mobile is growing more rapidly than consoles.

Future of DRM

By TwistedGreen • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Consoles have been PCs for a while now, just locked down, so I’m not sure what this will really mean. Will they try to lock down PCs even further, with more devious rootkits now that Windows 10 is dead and TPM2.0 is mandatory? Or will they embrace Linux and follow Valve’s lead by giving players the freedom to actually play the games they paid for? I’m not sure this guy has the answers, but I guess we’ll see.

PCs are too complex for most people.

By Qbertino • Score: 3 Thread

This is a detail many PC fanbois tend to overlook. And it’s the reason consoles are so successful.

Point in case: I ditched hardcore PC gaming 25 years ago because it was becoming ridiculous with the constant hardware upgrades, fiddling with drivers and the mess that is M$ W1ndows. And I at one time had the most performant gaming PC available that costed roughly 5000$. I’m a computer expert but when even AMD went from one socket type to something like 5 different (Intel was already at roughly 10 different socket types back then) I got tired of keeping track, said f*ck it and left PC gaming alltogether. I just stopped the hardware upgrades, installed Linux for programming and the occasional Linux-native Unreal Tournament and Tribes 2 session and left it at that. This was in the late 90ies. I don’t have the kind of space, time and attention anymore that PC gaming needs.

Roughly 15 years later I had some cash left and was curious about the new games such as the Deus Ex reboot and some discounted FarCry title and got an XBox 360, the last iteration just at the end of that generation that could run on a regular monitor without hassle. With all kinks fixed and a large cheap library of budget-priced games as GOTY premium editions and an affordable box that I knew would run those games with zero config fuss I was all set.

I’ve been with XBox ever since, always lagging 1-2 generations for price and stability reasons. I’m still using a Xbox One X as my main gaming rigg and it’s totally fine. Yeah, I do miss mouse and keyboard occasionally, but I also enjoy being prolific with the controller by now and just leaning back on the sofa doing Open World Looter-Shooters, (A)RPGs or the occasional Spaceflight game. Every once in a while I ponder getting back into PC gaming but when I l then look at the prices, the science involded and remember the hassle of dealing with shitty operating systems, drivers, flaky software, etc. I quickly drop that notion again.

I might look into that new Steam Box thing, but I still have 82 games for XBox One alone, not counting my 360 titles. Most of these games I haven’t played yet, so I’m not too much in a hurry. I also love the fact that the XBox is backwards compatible, which is a huge plus, Kudos to M$ for doing this. M$ W1ndows sucks, but with XBox they’re still the global underdog and behave accordingly. And have me, a prime-time Linux user for 25+ years, as a paying customer, believe it or not.

UK Cyber Ransom Ban Risks Collapse of Essential Services

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
The UK government has been warned that its plan to ban operators of critical national infrastructure from paying ransoms to hackers is unlikely to stop cyber attacks and could result in essential services collapsing. From a report:
The proposal, announced by the Home Office in July, is designed to deter cyber criminals by making it clear any attempt to blackmail regulated companies such as hospitals, airports and telecoms groups will not succeed. If enacted, the UK would be the first country to implement such a ban.

But companies and cyber groups have told government officials that making paying ransoms illegal would remove a valuable tool in negotiations where highly sensitive data or essential services could be compromised, according to two people familiar with the matter. “An outright ban on payments sounds tough on crime, but in reality it could turn a solvable crisis into a catastrophic one,” said Greg Palmer, a partner at law firm Linklaters.

Yeah you need to do both sides of an issue

By jacks smirking reven • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The policy is good but it needs to be coupled with efforts to incentivize and enforce these companies to comply with security protocols and proper backups and get them in a position where they won’t get ransom-wared in the first place, you need a national IT security policy and you need to enforce it, very similar to resturants and the health inspector.

That means spending some money and making some effort otherwise you are just shuffling the problem around. If you’re serious it should be a no brainer to spend that money otherwise it’s just more empty “tough on crime” policies that will go nowhere.

Not going to make any actual difference

By jonbryce • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

In previous ransomware attacks against government computers, such as NHS England, NHS Scotland, British Library, various school trusts, and some local councils, they have not paid the ransom.

We do need to ban ransom payments from the private sector to make the business model of these gangs not work. There is no other way to do it.

Re:Yeah you need to do both sides of an issue

By rjforster • Score: 4 Thread

I like to joke, and it’s only partially a joke, that there are two kinds of computer systems. Serious ones and toys.
If it’s a toy system then you can upgrade to the latest version, do whatever changes you want etc and if it breaks, well that’s OK because it’s just a toy.
If it’s a serious system then you can upgrade to the latest version, do whatever changes you want etc and if it breaks, then that’s also OK because you have a well funded, well designed, fully scrutinised and tested recovery policy and already tested all your changes in a properly representative system. Right. Right?
CNI would count as Serious++.

Of course I love it when people tell me that “No, no, no, this is critical but we have no funding and it’s running on some old servers we found in a skip”
At that point I note that delegation can work upwards as well as down, especially when it comes to responsibility and accountability.

Trivially easy to get around…

By ctilsie242 • Score: 3 Thread

This is trivially easy to get around.

Company ABC has a “security is no ROI” stance. They get ransomwared. The CEO of ABC puts out a PR memo that “oh no, hackers can punch through any defenses, we are pretty much helpless, and nobody could have seen that RID 500 could have been the target of credential stuffing. That stuff is too technical for anyone.” They hire XYZ company from offshore. They pay XYZ company the ransom + a consulting fee. XYZ pays the ransom, forwards the keys. Company ABC then says that they were able to use a third party that decrypted all their stuff and allowed them to function.

If later it is found that XYZ paid the ransom, perhaps via the fact that they did so via obvious blockchain transactions, as opposed to tumbling or moving to Monero and back to another BTC wallet, company ABC can just shrug, and claim plausible deniability, and how can they know? It isn’t like a corporation would ever have execs go to jail or anything like that.

Who exactly gave this advice

By hdyoung • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
to the UK government? Sounds like the UK government is getting advice from the cybercriminals themselves, because the reality is that, once a cybergang successfully attacks an org, the outlook is really, really grim.

https://www.halcyon.ai/blog/be…

If you pay the ransom, there is an 8% chance that the attackers will a) keep their word and b) actually provide keys to fix the problem.

So, there’s a 92% chance that you pay the ransom, your data is still compromised/destroyed and the criminals probably turn right around and attack you again next month, since you’ve already shown yourself to be a soft target. Oh, and they sell your stolen data to anyone with a checkbook simultaneously. Don’t fool yourself that they’ll keep any sort of promise.

Don’t. Pay. The. Ransom.

Global Web Freedoms Tumble

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
Global internet freedom declined for a 15th consecutive year, according to Freedom House’s annual report. Semafor:
“Always grim reading,” this year’s is particularly sobering, Tech Policy Press noted, with the lowest-ever portion of users living in countries categorized as “free.” Conditions declined in 27 of the 72 countries assessed, with those in Kenya — where anti-corruption protests were quelled, in part, by a seven-hour internet shutdown — deteriorating the most. China and Myanmar tied for least-free, and the US’ ranking dropped, while Iceland retained its top spot for the freest digital environment. Bangladesh improved the most. The most consistent trend observed over 15 years, Freedom House noted, is the growing digital influence of state actors: “Online spaces are more manipulated than ever.”

Re:Canada is Free?

By smooth wombat • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
The most liberal, most feminist and atheistic people are *absolutely enamored* with this religion that seemingly is against all of what these individuals espouse.

Nice trolling. Why would an atheist be “enamored” with this religion? Or any religion? They’re atheists.

As for the rest, considering Catholicism and Christianity are also religions which are seemingly against all of what “those people” espouse, is it any wonder they “hate” these religions as well.

Meanwhile Wisconsin wants to ban all VPNs

By BeaverCleaver • Score: 4, Informative Thread

The USA is not immune. The state of Wisconsin has already voted to ban the use of VPNs. The vote has already passed the State Assembly and is moving to the Senate: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/…

Why Hotel-Room Cancellations Disappeared

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
Hotel cancellation policies have transformed over the past seven years. Travelers once could cancel reservations up until the day before check-in without penalty. That flexibility has largely vanished.

The shift began around 2018 when third-party travel-booking sites deployed “cancel-rebook” strategies, the Atlantic writes. These platforms would monitor hotel rates after securing initial reservations. When prices dropped, the sites automatically canceled existing bookings and rebooked customers at lower rates. Hotels lost already-booked revenue whenever they reduced prices to fill empty rooms.

Hotels responded by introducing tiered pricing structures. Travelers now encounter prepaid non-refundable rates at the lowest price point, mid-range rates with two- or three-day cancellation deadlines, and higher rates for same-day cancellation flexibility. The cancel-rebook sites could still swap reservations until deadlines arrived, but the damage to hotels diminished.

Christopher Anderson, a professor at Cornell University’s Nolan School of Hotel Administration, told the outlet that hotel cancellations differ from airline cancellations. Most hotels operate as franchises rather than centrally-owned properties. A canceled Ithaca Marriott reservation cannot be converted to credit at a New York Marriott Marquis because different owners operate each location. Anderson suggests travelers call hotels directly to request exceptions. Hilton confirmed it evaluates cancellation waivers case-by-case and extends broad waivers during natural disasters or major disruptions.

Really the trend is moving away from 3rd party

By jacks smirking reven • Score: 5, Informative Thread

As someone who does a fair amount of work travel it really has become preferable to book through the hotel and airline sites than use Priceline or Expedia. Hotels generally don’t give you rewards points, they won’t handle issues at the front desk (you’ll have to call Expedia) and as mentioned the policies are different. Most hotels will honor the price rate a 3rd party site offers as well if you ask them to.

Re:Really the trend is moving away from 3rd party

By fluffernutter • Score: 4, Informative Thread
My wife used one of those apps to book a vacation one year. The app advertised free valet service. When we got to the hotel, not only did we not get that deal but there was someone else in line behind me that had the same issue. The hotel would do nothing, possibly fairly, because I was dealing with a third party. Never want back to anything like that again.

Re:Really the trend is moving away from 3rd party

By jacks smirking reven • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Yup only takes one time waiting on the lobby at 2AM on the phone with a Priceline rep trying to figure out why the hotel doesn’t have a record of your reservation to change ones tune as it did mine.

Re:Dumb managers manage dumbly

By PsychoSlashDot • Score: 4, Informative Thread

When prices dropped, the sites automatically canceled existing bookings and rebooked customers at lower rates. Hotels lost already-booked revenue whenever they reduced prices to fill empty rooms

Why penalize your best customers who reserve the longest in advance? Personally, I hate spending time hotel shopping, but I do, because the price and quality can vary greatly and it’s the only way to get a good price and a good room. But it is dumb management policy because it forces your customers - your best customers - to shop around every time they are looking for a room. Instead, I would be happily loyal to a chain that had uniformly good quality (not luxury, just good - clean, working pool, no bedbugs, hot breakfast) and guaranteed the best price (and they will lower my price if they decide to lower the price to “fill rooms”). Done. Why are managers so shortsighted and dumb?

Did you read what you quoted? Those are the worst customers.

The hotel needs to book X rooms at $Y to break even on a given day. They know their average room-fill rate, and they build their asking price based on that, with the target profit on top, getting $Z. A customer books a room in advance, and agrees to pay $Z.

All is well so far.

Now, as the day approaches, the hotel sees that they are not booking to capacity. So they offer the remaining rooms at below $Z and possibly even below $Y because empty rooms bring zero revenue.

You can view that the long-booked customer is getting a poorer deal than the last-minute booker. Okay. Too bad. You agreed to the terms you agreed to. And you got the guarantee that your room is held, where someone who waits until closer to the date may not get a room. It’s completley fair.

The problem comes in when a customer uses a third-party booking company that cancels and rebooks, artificially replacing foundational income that was used to determine when discounts could be issued, replacing a $Z consumer with something less. That act undermines the hotel’s profitability and stability.

I don’t know why booking anywhere but a hotel is even a thing. Makes no sense to me whatsoever for a third party site to generate a discount. And playing scummy games that erode the predictability necessary to operate something like a hotel or restaurant… also not cool. I don’t see how the hotel’s actions are in the wrong.

I find it illuminating that your demands are simply the best quality and the lowest price. Easy-peasy, right? You’re part of the problem.

Huh? Where?

By thegarbz • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Literally every hotel I’ve booked in both Marriott or Hilton chains has a cancellation policy including night before. Literally. Every. Single. One. I only have about 500 nights in a hotel since 2018 including plenty in several states in America. Is this some hyper localised trend where the writer lives or something?

Anthropic CEO Says He’s ‘Deeply Uncomfortable’ With Unelected Tech Elites Shaping AI

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei says he’s uneasy about how much power a handful of tech leaders — including himself — have over the future of artificial intelligence. From a report:
“I think I’m deeply uncomfortable with these decisions being made by a few companies, by a few people,” Amodei told Anderson Cooper in a “60 Minutes” episode that aired Sunday. “Like who elected you and Sam Altman?” asked Anderson. “No one. Honestly, no one,” Amodei replied.

Flip side

By DarkOx • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Would he actually be more comfortable with our Elected non-tech elites making the big decisions?

I just don’t see our legislative process, or administrative state terribly equipped to deal with shaping AI technology.

I think their job is to:
1) Ensure societies existing guard rails are uniformly and fairly applied to all, independent as to if AI has anything to do with the activity or not.
2) Respond reactively. If we identify a specific activity when coupled with AI is in some way corrosive to the society we generally want to have, then enact legislation to curb it in that area. While generally speaking anticipating problems and trying to avoid them is good practice, with something like this evolving this rapidly, I believe you usually create more issues if you go trying to solve problems you don’t really know you yet have.

A good example is work force reduction, a lot of people are convinced there is going to be a huge wave of job losses that are directly attributed to AI, we don’t really have any evidence of that yet. There are plenty of equally plausible explanations for unemployment rate increases right now. So if you go legislation a bunch of ‘things’ companies are not allowed to use ML/AI tech for and it turns out the UE uptick isn’t ai related all you have done is limited productivity gains and created more economic drag.

It is important to keep in mind this is mostly just computers filling out paper work, taking down orders, and churning out questionable quality music and video clips. Hardly things we can’t ‘shut off’ if need be. It isn’t like nearly as destructive and irreversible as all kinds of development projects we often give the private sector a long leash to run with.

Re: It’s called Capitalism

By i_ate_god • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Yes but the free market naturally trends towards consolidation, and thus plutocracy.

You’ve missed the elephant

By Viol8 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

LLMs make a lot of mistakes but the tech bros don’t care - they’re using them for all sorts of things including supposed self driving cars. If the AI fucks up and causes issues , well , on appendix section 16, sub section A, paragraph 21 there’ll be a clause explicitly exempting the AI company from any responsibility and in jurisdictions where that disclaimer is void then what the hell, they’ve made billions anyway and they’ll just settle out of court.

His Whole Pitch is Safety

By Jason Earl • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Anthropic’s entire pitch has always been safety. Innovation like this tends to favor a very few companies, and it leaves behind a whole pile of losers that also had to spend ridiculous amounts of capital in the hopes of catching the next wave. If you bet on the winning company you make a pile of money, if you pick one of the losers then the capital you invested evaporates. Anthropic has positioned itself as OpenAI, except with safeguards, and that could very well be the formula that wins the jackpot. Historically, litigation and government sponsorship have been instrumental in picking winners.

However, as things currently stand, Anthropic is unlikely to win on technical merits over its competition. So Dario’s entire job as a CEO is basically to get the government involved. If he can create enough doubt about the people that are currently making decisions in AI circles that the government gets involved, either directly through government investment, or indirectly through legislation, then his firm has a chance at grabbing the brass ring. That’s not to say that he is wrong, he might even be sincere. It is just that it isn’t surprising that his pitch is that AI has the potential to be wildly dangerous and we need to think about safety. That’s essentially the only path that makes his firm a viable long term player.

Re:You’ve missed the elephant

By swillden • Score: 4 Thread

they’re using them for all sorts of things including supposed self driving cars. If the AI fucks up and causes issues , well , on appendix section 16, sub section A, paragraph 21 there’ll be a clause explicitly exempting the AI company from any responsibility

Waymo, at least, has explicitly taken responsibility for whatever their self-driving cars do. And, honestly, it doesn’t seem possible for a self-driving system’s maker to avoid liability, because there’s absolutely no other entity to assign it to. Tesla avoids liability (so far) by explicitly requiring human supervision. But if they ever want to claim level 4 or 5 they’re going to have to take responsibility.

in jurisdictions where that disclaimer is void then what the hell, they’ve made billions anyway and they’ll just settle out of court

I think such a disclaimer would be invalid in all jurisdictions, if they even tried to make it, which I don’t think they’ll do because it would be ridiculous. As for settling… yeah, that’s what basically always happens with automobile accidents. The at-fault party (or their insurer) pays the costs of the injured party. No one even bothers going to court unless there’s a dispute about which party was at fault, and one thing about self-driving systems is that they have incredibly-detailed sensor data, all logged and available for review, so there really won’t ever be any dispute about fault.

Florida Bill Would Require Cursive Instruction in Elementary Schools

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot
An anonymous reader shares a report:
Elementary-school students would have to learn how to write in cursive, under a bill set to be vetted by a House committee next week. Sen. Erin Grall, R-Vero Beach, filed a similar proposal (SB 444) on Monday. The House Student Academic Success Subcommittee is set to review the measure (HB 127) on Nov. 18.

Sponsored by Rep. Toby Overdorf, R-Palm City, the bill would require cursive instruction in second through fifth grades. The proposal, filed for consideration for the legislative session that begins Jan. 13, also would require students to demonstrate proficiency in cursive by the end of fifth grade.

And do the teachers know how to?

By TomTraynor • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
I wonder how many of the teachers even know how to write in cursive.

Not as important as bringing back flashcards

By RobinH • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

There was an educational movement just after 2000 where for some reason teachers decided that rote learning was bad, so the activists within the ranks of teachers went through and got rid of everything that was strictly memorization and practice-based. This included everything from phonics to flash cards and of course cursive. In fact I think keyboarding was also a victim. My kids didn’t take any of these things in school (we’re in Ontario, Canada). Their handwriting is awful.

We sat in the evenings teaching them how to read (sounding words out), doing adding, subtracting, and multiplying flashcards with them, and I bought a typing tutor program and repeatedly encouraged them to use it. The Ontario government brought back mandatory cursive teaching to classrooms just after my kids left elementary school. I would say, of all these things, learning your times tables is way more important than cursive. There was a lot of research in recent years showing that both “learning to understand” *and* rote learning are important for a child’s education, but it seems like the school boards won’t admit their mistakes until the people who made those mistakes retire.

Just as my kids entered high school, the provincial government, worried that certain minority groups weren’t doing well on tests and were over-represented in basic classes (vs. academic level) decided to de-stream both grade 9 and grade 10, and remove all exams from grades 9 and 10 as well. You don’t have to write an exam in Ontario until you reach grade 11. Let’s be clear… the data showed that kids from minority groups weren’t doing as well, and their solution was to stop collecting data. It’s absurd.

I really do feel like the education system was unethically experimenting on my kids this whole time. The worst part is that they were basing their decision on pop-psychology teacher-memes instead of hard and fast evidence-based research. The cost of these mistakes will be paid by the generation of kids who are only now moving on to university and the workforce. The whole saga sickens me.

Re:A useful skill to have.

By MBGMorden • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Hand-writing is fine. Cursive itself is pointless. Print is just as fast in modern times and is FAR more legible.

If you look at cursive writing from like an 1800’s census or something, half of it is virtually impossible to read. Cursive was invented for use with QUILLS. Even if you’re writing by hand now you’re using a pencil or an ink pen, not a quill.

Re:It a guidebook…

By DesScorp • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

How to watch republicans piss away taxpayer money on utterly useless crap, trying to get back to a past that time forgot…

Oh FFS. There are lots of knowledge that isn’t “practical” yet is valuable to our culture. You people piss and moan about children not being properly educated, but when someone suggests that things like cursive writing and other finer points of civilization should continue to be taught, you scoff with bullshit like this.

My mother’s generation had mandatory classes in Latin during high school in the early 1960’s. As a culture, we’re the poorer for having dropped those kinds of requirements. There’s a reason the finer schools still require them. I’m all for more of a focus on the practical for kids… more shop classes, more practical math (loans and interest, basic accounting, etc), but to suggest that we should chuck all of the finer points of culture into the trash because it’s “trying to get back to a past that time forgot” is complete and utter horseshit.

Re:It a guidebook…

By omnichad • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

That’s not what makes education expensive. And learning languages that influence later languages (Latin) is the type of metalearning that prepares you for higher education. And helps if you’re in a STEM field too, since so much language is borrowed from there.