Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Mark Zuckerberg Says Meta Has Reached AI ‘Frontier’, Rejects Calls For Slowdown
  2. Google’s Fitbit Edge Debuts a Replaceable Battery, Brings Back the Screen
  3. Russia Was Not Ready For the Data Center War It Started With Ukraine
  4. Hackers Heat French Supermarket Fridges, Sparking Fires and Spoiling Food
  5. AI Coding Agents Generate More Code, But Not More Software
  6. Amazon In Talks To Buy AI Startup Decart For Around $7 Billion
  7. Q3 2026 Was Historically Bad For PC Shipments
  8. Should We Beware of Other License Plate Surveillance Companies Besides Flock?
  9. How the US Nuclear Plant Fleet Is Leaning Into AI
  10. Let’s Encrypt to Cut SSL Certificate Lifetimes to 64 Days in February 2027
  11. Game Console Market Craters: Xbox and PS5 Sales Plummet Over 25%
  12. Research Firm Calls Anthropic’s Upcoming IPO ‘Unprecedented Test of Investor Gullibity’
  13. Gas Cars Fall Below 50% of Global New Car Sales for the First Time
  14. ‘The Social Reckoning’ Bombs with $5.5 Million Opening
  15. Blade Runner, Star Trek, Godzilla, Star Wars + Marvel (and Legos): News From New York Comic-Con

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Mark Zuckerberg Says Meta Has Reached AI ‘Frontier’, Rejects Calls For Slowdown

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg says the company has reached the AI “frontier” with its new Muse Wonder model and will be offered as a closed, paid product for businesses. Zuckerberg also rejected calls for an industry-wide slowdown, arguing that AI can be managed with conventional guardrails as Meta continues spending heavily on models, infrastructure, and talent. The Financial Times reports:
Speaking with the FT as Meta releases its Muse Wonder AI model on Monday, the billionaire chief executive claimed the new system was “going to allow much more sophisticated behaviours that are at the frontier of what is being done in the AI field.” […] “Getting to this point both required a large amount of compute and investment, and a lot of very rigorous scientific work by the group working on it over an extended period of time,” said Zuckerberg. […] Meta said Muse Wonder outperforms Anthropic’s Claude Opus 5.5 and Fable 5.1 and OpenAI’s GPT-6 Astra on some technical benchmarks. It said the new model can be used to carry out complex tasks from “understanding a lease to making sense of financial or health information.” However, Muse Wonder will also be “closed,” with its best versions sold directly to businesses. That pits it against Anthropic and OpenAI for corporate AI contracts in a serious test of its ambitions. Zuckerberg signaled further spending as Meta was “already working on the next step up,” adding that its model development would “probably feel like it’ll go quite a bit faster from here.”

However, he also shrugged off mounting fears that the technology was advancing at a rate that will soon surpass human control. […] The Meta chief declined to be drawn on his figure for “P(doom)" — a much-discussed Silicon Valley term to describe the probability that AI will lead to mass destruction. Instead, he argued that responsibility should fall on the individual lab to ensure model safety. “I’m much closer to the belief that AI is a technology that can be engineered with normal guardrails and built responsibly than the anthropomorphic vision of AI, which is that it is just going to go do its own thing,” he said. Zuckerberg has previously rejected calls by the heads of AI labs such as Anthropic’s Dario Amodei and OpenAI’s Sam Altman for an industry-wide “slowdown” in AI development. He also played a key role in crafting US President Donald Trump’s White House “Accord on Super Intelligence,” setting out principles for self-regulation of the industry, which critics say falls far short of a formal global AI governance regime.

Google’s Fitbit Edge Debuts a Replaceable Battery, Brings Back the Screen

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Google has introduced the $179 Fitbit Edge, a new fitness tracker with a 1.34-inch OLED display, built-in GPS, ECG support, week-long battery life, and Fitbit’s first user-replaceable battery. “And unlike the Pixel Watch, it’s compatible with Android and iPhones via the Google Health app,” reports Wired. From the report:
The Edge has a user-replaceable battery, a Fitbit first, aligning with Google’s efforts to make its Pixel Watch more repairable. (Likely also due to new battery regulations set to take effect next year in the European Union.) Repair options will vary by region and availability. If you find the Pixel Watch’s round face too bulky, the Edge’s capsule-shaped alternative might suit smaller wrists better. If the Charge 6’s 1.04-inch display was too small, the Edge upgrades it to a larger 1.34-inch screen. The difference is noticeable, and that extra real estate could make a real impact when glancing at your metrics mid-workout.

The Edge borrows a few more attributes from the Pixel Watch, including an altimeter that uses atmospheric pressure to measure elevation changes. That means it can record elevation gain and loss during outdoor activities, track floors climbed, and add more context to your outdoor stats. It also has a far-field skin temperature sensor, replacing the standard device temperature sensor found in other Fitbits. By bringing some of the Pixel Watch’s more advanced hardware to a fitness-first wearable, Google is giving the Edge a compelling middle-ground position in its lineup at a Fitbit-friendly price.

The Edge inherits the Fitbit Air’s improvements while restoring several Charge 6 features the screenless tracker lacks, including built-in GPS and electrical sensors that work with the electrocardiogram (ECG) app. You can also control music playback on a connected Bluetooth device, as you could with the Charge 6, and Google Maps turn-by-turn directions will arrive later this year. […] With a Google Health Premium subscription, the Edge can track blood pressure trends without manual calibration and insulin resistance trends without requiring a blood draw. Google first announced these capabilities alongside the Pixel Watch 5’s debut, but they only became available at the end of September. They’re also available on the Air, keeping Google’s screenless tracker up to date as its lineup expands.

Russia Was Not Ready For the Data Center War It Started With Ukraine

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica:
When Russia began attacking Ukrainian data centers and telecommunication infrastructure, it apparently failed to prepare for possible retaliation. Now Russia’s digital services are facing widespread outages after Ukrainian drone strikes knocked out three of the largest data centers owned by Russian tech giant Yandex within several days. Pro-Kremlin bloggers are warning that Russia’s centralized digital economy could collapse because the country is not prepared for the “data center war” it started, according to posts translated by the pseudonymous independent researcher ChrisO_wiki. The Russian commentators also suggested that Ukraine’s decentralized digital services could prove more resilient than Russia’s system if the countries continue trading such blows.

Russia initially launched a drone strike campaign targeting Ukrainian data centers and mobile phone networks in late September. The attacks temporarily disrupted Internet and cell phone service for up to 100,000 households in the Ukrainian capital of Kyiv and came as part of a broader long-range strike campaign that has involved Russian missiles and jet-powered drones hitting Ukraine’s power grid infrastructure, transportation hubs, and even residential apartment building blocks. But Ukraine soon began striking back at data centers owned by the Russian company Yandex, also known as “Russia’s Google,” in what Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has described as a “symmetrical response.”

[…] More importantly for Russian society, the damage to Yandex’s data centers has reportedly caused interruptions or outages to popular Russian payment apps and digital banking services, email, e-commerce platforms, video streaming services, ride-hailing and food delivery apps, and navigation and map services. Yandex’s search engine also accounts for about 70 percent of the market share in Russia. The disruptions are even more widespread, because the data center damage also impacts Yandex’s cloud computing service, which counts some of Russia’s largest companies as customers, according to The Moscow Times, an independent newspaper. These include large grocery and fast-food chains as well as a household appliance retailer.

Good for the US as well…

By jonwil • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

This is a good thing for the US since it seems that these data centers hosted bot farms spreading all kinds of lies in an attempt to influence the upcoming US elections.

Re:All war is total war

By Retired Chemist • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread
When Russia started this they were not expecting a war. They were confident that the Ukrainians would welcome them. Why they believed that is something I cannot answer. They then found themselves in much the same mess that the US is in the Middle East. It is a lot easier to start a war than to end one. Particularly if your leader has put his reputation on the line.

It’s the midterms

By rsilvergun • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread
Russia heavily influences US elections via social media and since it benefits the Republican party they’re allowed to do it.

Ukraine is taking them offline for the election, which is brilliant. Several close races will probably go blue now

Remember, Putin was in charge of information warfare at the KGB. And we all know he’s sitting on unredacted Epstein files.

Much deserved schadenfreude

By RUs1729 • • Score: 3 • Thread

It is difficult to feel sorry about Russia’s problems.

Delenda est Russia

Hackers Heat French Supermarket Fridges, Sparking Fires and Spoiling Food

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Hackers remotely manipulated connected refrigeration systems at hundreds of French supermarkets, reportedly pushing some fridges and freezers to 50C (122F), spoiling food and even sparking fires. According to Reuters, French Prime Minister Sebastien Lecornu ordered a cybersecurity investigation into the hacks, with similar incidents reported in Spain, Portugal, Poland, Germany, and Belgium. In France, Carrefour reported 80 affected stores, Monoprix said 5% of its locations were hit, and Les Mousquetaires said refrigerators at roughly 150 Intermarche stores were heated to 50C for six hours. From the report:
Supermarket cold aisles are typically run by control panels that manage an entire store’s fridges and freezers and can be accessed over the internet, which lets maintenance companies adjust them from anywhere. The source close to Lecornu said ANSSI had identified a vulnerability in software supplied by Danish company Danfoss.

Danfoss said it was “aware of incidents in France affecting a limited number of refrigeration management systems.” The affected units “were running outdated firmware,” Danfoss said, adding that it had “long advised customers to keep supported systems updated with the latest firmware and to migrate legacy systems to current-generation solutions.”

On August 9, cybersecurity firm Claroty’s Team82 published research detailing vulnerabilities in the Danfoss AK-SM 800A controller. According to the report, software updates issued by Danfoss addressed issues that could have allowed attackers to bypass authentication controls and execute code on compromised devices.

Stop hooking standalone things to the internet.

By AgTiger • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

From the article: “Supermarket cold aisles are typically run by control panels that manage an entire store’s fridges and freezers and can be accessed over the internet, which lets maintenance companies adjust them from anywhere.”

Well, there’s your problem. Stop doing stupid things like that.

Nice weasel wording

By newslash.formatblows • • Score: 3 • Thread
“aware of incidents in France affecting a limited number of refrigeration management systems.”

That’s reassuring. I was afraid for a minute that an infinite number of refrigerators had been hacked.

Buck passed

By jrq • • Score: 3 • Thread
“outdated firmware” - Buck passed. Customer at fault.

AI Coding Agents Generate More Code, But Not More Software

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
A study of more than 700 software firms found that AI coding agents significantly increase the amount of code developers produce, but not the amount of software companies actually ship. Ars Technica reports:
A recent study (PDF) of actual coding practices across hundreds of firms finds that human code review forms a significant “bottleneck” for the overall efficiency of AI coding tools, resulting in “little evidence that firms increase software output or reduce employment” by using them. Any efficiency increased during the actual coding phase, the study authors find, is “absorbed by downstream constraints in the production process”; as “the code review process significantly increases in length, pull requests are more likely to require revisions, and reviewers leave more comments.”

[…] In terms of raw code being produced, the results are clear and stark. The introduction of AI coding agents at a firm leads to a 30 percent increase in total lines of code generated, a 20 percent rise in the number of total commits, and a 23 percent increase in pull requests on average, the researchers write. But all that extra code doesn’t translate directly into improved software output on the firm level. On the contrary, the resolution rate for Issues and Epics (i.e. wholesale software features) tracked by tools like Jira did not change in a statistically significant way after AI tools were introduced (the researchers also found no “compositional shift” in the size or complexity of those Jira-tracked issues across the AI introduction).

The reason for that discrepancy can be found directly in the code review process, which takes markedly longer on average after the introduction of AI coding agents. Overall, the average “review process” time between a pull request getting submitted and it being merged into the codebase balloons 49 percent on average after AI agents are introduced. That effect can be seen in more granular data, too, with “the share of pull requests with changes requested nearly doubl[ing], and the number of comments per pull request increas[ing] by 35%" following the AI agent shift, the researchers write.

In response to this change, the researchers found a 14 percent increase in the share of workers performing code reviews after AI agents’ introduction. They also write that they “cannot attribute significant employment changes to AI” after looking at total active workers across Jellyfish and cross-referencing with LinkedIn data at those firms. While AI could also theoretically help with this review process, the researchers found that, so far, that impact has been marginal. Although 80 percent of measured firms used some form of AI code review by March 2026, AI agents were only responsible for 23.3 percent of all review comments and 10.8 percent of all pull requests, suggesting humans were still responsible for the vast majority of this work.

Shocked

By 0123456 • • Score: 3 • Thread

Turns out it takes longer to review code that no-one understands.

The solution, obviously, is to have the AI review the code too so humans don’t need to understand it.

Doing it properly works but is NOT FUN

By greytree • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
We had problems with massive pull requests containing code the submitter does not understand.
The solution is to require developers to fully understand the code they submit, and check that understanding

When you take the time to understand the AI-written code ( often using the AI to explain its own code ), there is no problem and you can proceed significantly faster than without AI.

The problem is that that work to gain understanding is boring.
While I often had to do it in the days before AI, I did not become a programmer to spend all my time understanding code I did not write myself.

I think *that* is the serious problem for our industry.

Amazon In Talks To Buy AI Startup Decart For Around $7 Billion

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Amazon is reportedly in talks to acquire AI startup Decart in a deal that could value the company at up to $7 billion. Decart’s DOS software helps developers optimize AI models for different processors in weeks rather than months, a capability that could be particularly useful to AWS as it pushes its own Trainium chips. SiliconANGLE reports:
The company has developed software called DOS, which can help developers to speed up AI training and inference workloads by optimizing their neural networks to run on a specific processor. In most AI workloads, developers must optimize a neural network for the chip they plan to run it on. This process used to take months, but with DOS, the workflow necessary to do this can be compressed into just a couple of weeks. As a result, companies can use Decart’s software to shift AI workloads to different processors if their requirements change, or if chip availability becomes an issue.

In addition to DOS, Decart is also a model developer, responsible for creating the Lucy and Oasis world models, which are designed to generate and simulate realistic three-dimensional environments for video games, robotic training and other use cases. It’s still possible another suitor could emerge and outbid Amazon. Last month, Anthropic PBC was reportedly engaged in talks to buy Decart, according to a report by Bloomberg. However, it ultimately pulled out of a reported $6 billion deal after conducting due diligence on the startup. It’s not clear what ultimately dissuaded Anthropic from pursuing a deal.
The Wall Street Journal first reported (paywalled) the news.

That DOS acronym

By AgTiger • • Score: 3 • Thread

Decart’s acronym for DOS is “Decart Optimization Stack”.

Those of us old enough to remember will immediately think “Disk Operating System” though.

Q3 2026 Was Historically Bad For PC Shipments

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
PC shipments fell 20.1% year over year to 62.7 million units in the third quarter of 2026, the worst Q3 decline IDC has recorded. “The top three PC makers — Lenovo, Dell, and HP — also saw their shipments fall by over 20% year over year,” reports PCMag. From the report:
“If looking at all quarters, then we have seen other quarters in recent years with larger declines, such as 2022Q4, which was -28.2%, and 2023Q1, which was -28.7%. Both were coming off pandemic highs,” IDC Director Jitesh Ubrani told PCMag in an email. The numbers aren’t a great sign, since third-quarter PC shipments usually outpace those in the second quarter as vendors introduce new products ahead of the holiday shopping season. Instead, PC shipments were at 62.7 million units, down 9.1% from the previous quarter.

[…] Of course, the downturn isn’t a surprise. IDC and other research firms have warned that the ongoing AI-driven memory shortage threatens to sap demand for PCs and phones due to soaring memory and storage costs. “What we’re seeing is the result of the strong first half pull-in. Vendors and channels loaded up on inventory early in the year to get ahead of [memory-related] price hikes, and that has thrown off the usual seasonality, where Q3 is typically larger than Q2,” Ubrani said in a report covering IDC’s preliminary estimates for the quarter.

In one bright spot, Ubrani said vendors and retailers might cut prices to generate interest and clear out products they have in stock. “Channels are now worried about carrying too much inventory into a market where high prices are suppressing demand. That could translate into promotions and some short-term relief for consumers, but we don’t expect pricing anywhere near what it was a year ago. Prices will remain elevated,” he added.

You’re All Wrong

By SlashbotAgent • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

You’re all thinking; ‘Yea serves them right for price gouging.’ But, you’d be wrong.

You see Dell PC sales down 20%. But look at what Dell sees:

Q2 2027 (Reported July 2026)
Record revenue of $47.0 billion, up 58% year over year
Record diluted earnings per share (EPS) of $6.34, up 273% year over year, and record non-GAAP diluted EPS of $7.04, up 203%
Cash flow from operations of $2.2 billion
Full-year FY27 revenue guidance of $192.0 billion, up 69% year over year
Full-year FY27 EPS guidance of $24.37 and non-GAAP EPS guidance of $25.50, up 181% and 148% year over year, respectively

Best fucking quarter EVAR!!!!

Then they raised their forecast and the stock went ballistic.

https://investors.delltechnolo…

Wrong take.

By Petersko • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

The story isn’t that sales have fallen 20%. It’s that 80% of the demand still exists.

What we’ve really taught these companies is that they’ve traditionally undervalued their products, and if component prices return to “normal” there is no reason at all that retail prices need to track it. The supply side has all the power, and they know it now.

The new normal sucks.

Should We Beware of Other License Plate Surveillance Companies Besides Flock?

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
NPR reports:
Police officers in cities across the U.S. are quick to extol the virtues of real-time crime centers as a game changer that helps them find missing children, monitor large events from the skies and scope out dangerous scenes before putting an officer in harm’s way. Hundreds of police departments have one of these central hubs, which have existed for years. But many are now being powered with AI software, such as Fusus, from the public-safety technology giant Axon… synthesizing the data it pulls in and allowing police command centers to watch an entire city from one place.

Flock cameras, the automated license plate readers (ALPRs), have faced intense backlash in recent months amid stories of abuse. Yet privacy experts say they’re just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to police surveillance. “I have been watching the debate about Flock with a little bit of puzzlement,” says Andrew Guthrie Ferguson, a law professor at George Washington University. “Because real-time crime centers have not just ALPR cameras and sensors, but video analytics and drones and essentially a way to create a visual single-pane-of-glass vision of what’s going on in a city, with time machine capabilities where you can go back and investigate crime.” Tools like Axon Fusus, which is a leader in this type of software, also pull in footage and data from police body cameras, law enforcement dashcams, 911 dispatch, gunshot detectors and surveillance cameras, including sometimes those of private businesses that opt in. Its use is growing fast. In 2024, the technology news site 404 Media reported that just over 100 law enforcement agencies had deployed Fusus, which was then its own company and was acquired by Axon that year. The number of law enforcement agencies using the tool has more than doubled since then, according to Axon.
Even the American Civil Liberties Union warned concerned citizens in August that "Flock is far from the only vendor,” adding that “it’s important to realize that its competitors aren’t so great either, and that simply replacing Flock surveillance with another company’s surveillance won’t necessarily solve any of the privacy and other civil liberties problems posed by this mass surveillance technology.”
Communities can’t simply assume that their residents will be better off from a privacy and civil liberties perspective by dropping Flock and replacing it with another ALPR provider, as some customers have done. They should ask hard questions about whether they really want to create that kind of a system, and if they do, ensure it doesn’t function as a mass surveillance system…

One of Flock’s most significant competitors is Motorola. This company, which has been expanding its police technology offerings through an aggressive acquisition strategy in recent years, offers a nationwide law enforcement data sharing system similar to Flock’s called the National Vehicle Location Service, operated by Motorola unit Vigilant Solutions. In addition to collecting data from law enforcement clients’ cameras, it also runs a large separate commercial ALPR unit that makes deals for tow trucks and other fleet vehicles to carry cameras and collect data for Motorola as they drive around, amassing billions of plate reads (a claimed 500 million monthly, subject to no apparent data retention policy). Known as the Digital Recognition Network, that unit sells its data for commercial purposes but also makes it available to its law enforcement customers for an extra charge. Motorola tells agencies they can have “access to billions of detections beyond your own.”
Abandoning Flock for another system doesn’t protect privacy, their article argues. “If a jurisdiction decides to allow license scanners to be installed, how that system operates is more important than which vendor provides it…” They recommend strong restrictions like data retention limits — and imposing them by law rather than in the language of contracts with vendors (which could always be renegotiated).

Yes because despite what cowards think

By Inglix the Mad • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
1984 wasn’t supposed to be an instruction manual.

We should also be keeping an eye out for them adding, or separately mounting, corollary surveillance items.

We already see Flock, and I’ll guarantee other vendors are looking to add it as well, SIGINT to the cameras. That means even if they can’t see your plate, or even your car very well because you rented a trailer, they can track you by WiFi/Bluetooth to a few feet.

We should also be keeping an eye out for them to roll out facial recognition integration. They have it all set to go, and may even have live near you. Axon has it. ACTi sells long range zoom cameras with it. There are even vendors that add it to Flock as a software layer..

There are a few thing we should do:
1) Make it a state felony worth a 5-10 years in prison for law enforcement to abuse the cameras. No warrant? Congrats snowflake you just caught a MINIMUM 5 year sentence in prison with no early release option. When they whine about the penalty, remind them that they say you need hefty punishments to deter crime. When they inevitably whine about the warrant remind them they say “this isn’t mass surveillance” and “this isn’t real-time surveillance” so waiting a few minutes on the phone to personally affirm to the judge under penalty of perjury isn’t a big deal. You’re only looking backward in time.
2) Put vendors on the hook for not following data retention / sharing limitation standards. That latest update flipped a switch that changed a customer’s share settings? Congratulations snowflake, you just caught a fine worth 10 times the original contract, per day.
3) Make it illegal to repackage and sell ANY data from the cameras, or other sensors, to anyone. I mean, seriously folks, how long do you think it will take for the companies to start selling? That is, if they aren’t already under the table.

Police and many politicians will whine. You can be dang sure the companies will screech loud to the Calvinball Court. I don’t care. Not only is this stuff reek of fascism it’s a national security nightmare.

Re:They aren’t the problem

By Inglix the Mad • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
These aren’t supposed to be real-time surveillance, remember? That’s the Flock, and other, ALPR out for these things. The moment they admit they’re real-time tracking is the day every single one of these cameras is ripped out under precedent that the government doesn’t get to track everyone in public on the off-chance of catching a criminal.

Double that when it includes facial recognition and SIGINT.

Re:They aren’t the problem

By drinkypoo • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

These aren’t supposed to be real-time surveillance, remember? That’s the Flock, and other, ALPR out for these things. The moment they admit they’re real-time tracking is the day every single one of these cameras is ripped out

Anyone who wants to know can look right now and find out that yes, the Flock cameras are always watching. But since they don’t belong to the government, that’s legal. You might argue that it shouldn’t be, that if they’re just turning around and handing the data to the police on any request (that is, without a warrant) then they are effectively functioning as a part of the police department. And in that case I would agree, but so far courts have permitted that to continue.

under precedent that the government doesn’t get to track everyone in public on the off-chance of catching a criminal

Yeah, but again, so far if a private company is doing it and then giving the data to the cops, it’s not government surveillance. An even worse example of such a partnership is that the US Postal Service hands all of the mailpiece scanning data to the FBI. The feds are logging 100% of our snail mail metadata, and tracking who is sending what (type of mail) to who. All backbones are monitored and a percentage of traffic can be sampled in realtime, Never forget QWest. Need I go on? The government is spying on us in every way, both directly and indirectly. Most people are fully head-up-ass about it so they don’t have to think about it.

Re:Yes and no

By doc1623 • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread
I love your first sentence, but it’s more than just errors; it’s a violation of privacy and basic human rights. Especially, as the police are just badly designed. There needs to be external oversight to police. “protect and serve” shouldn’t be just a re-branding after a the police go off the rails, it should be the ideal they strive for. Unfortunately, police abuse the law and citizens daily all over the country. They work for the major who serves the biggest campaign donors. So, the last thing they do (generally) is work for most of us. Of course, we all know self-auditing never works as well as it should.

Abos-fucking-lutely!!!!

By SlashbotAgent • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

All of them, all of them, take us down the same road to the same destination.

Flock caught everyone’s attention because they used prominent and easily recognizable devices popping up everywhere. Then we realized their shitty behavior and the shitty behavior of authorities that Flock facilitated. At our expense, I might add. So Flock is getting all of the attention, right now.

But, Axon, Motorola, et al are all pushing the same products and services. Their equipment blends into our daily lives a bit more so they are less noticed. But they are all striving to dominate the market that Flock is spotlighting and they are all a massive threat. They’ll soon be connecting into DOT cameras on highways and every traffic light. Assuming that they haven’t already.

All of these vendors and their products or services are a massive threat. All. Of. Them.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?…

How the US Nuclear Plant Fleet Is Leaning Into AI

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
“This year, nearly the entire fleet of 94 U.S. nuclear reactors has been offered the chance to integrate AI into its operations, and most have taken it,” reports IEEE Spectrum:
In August, California-based Atomic Canyon launched NIVA, the Nuclear Industry Virtual Assistant, which was developed in cooperation with nuclear-industry groups. The assistant was pilot-tested in nuclear plants run by Constellation Energy and is now available to the United States’ entire fleet of reactors.... Meanwhile, the AI-for-nuclear startup Nuclearn says its products have gone to work with more than 65 U.S. partners, a total that includes many traditional plants but also an integration with NuScale Power Corp. that is working toward advanced small nuclear reactors. Microsoft and Nvidia have collaborated on a project to apply AI toward optimizing “the entire life cycle of a nuclear plant, spanning site permitting, design, construction, and continuous operations.”

The reason for the rapid adoption, according to Nuclearn CFO and cofounder Jerrold Vincent, is twofold. First, the technology companies banking their futures on AI are also keen on a revival of nuclear power to provide the electricity for all those data centers. Vincent says AI is also ideal for addressing some of the nuclear industry’s most pressing problems. Many of the things that make reactors so difficult to operate — intricate regulations, along with complex systems for management and maintenance — are exactly the kinds of tasks that AI is good at. The industry is staggering to deal with aging hardware and an aging workforce. If it is going to survive, and have a real shot at a nuclear revival, it will need help from machine intelligence, Vincent says…

Right now, the principal output of a nuclear reactor (aside from electricity) is paperwork. Nuclear plants produce piles of documentation to demonstrate regulatory compliance and to record how they respond to any potential problem, from a crack in the sidewalk to a fault in the reactor… Nuclearn’s AI products help plants search through large repositories of data more efficiently to more quickly file paperwork with the federal government or figure out how a particular problem was solved in the past. “If you think of it as ChatGPT for nuclear,” he says, “it’s actually not a bad place to start.”
It’s especially important because the nuclear power industry “has a remarkably skilled but quickly shrinking workforce tasked with keeping old reactors online and possibly starting up new ones to meet surging demand for electricity,” the article points out.

It also stresses that “So far, both the Nuclearn and NIVA large language models used in the nuclear world report to humans and don’t go anywhere near power plant operations.”

A computer can never be held accountable

By sinkskinkshrieks • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
Therefore a computer must never make a management decision.

Good grief

By 93 Escort Wagon • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

If any story ever deseved a #whatcouldpossiblygowrong tag - this is it.

What could possibly go wrong?

By engineer37 • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread
You’re right, I should not have lowered the coolant levels. I should be honest, I caused a meltdown and that’s on me. Thank you for pushing back on this!

More Slop Summaries

By Aighearach • • Score: 3 • Thread

So much BS in this fake story. Nvidia and Microsoft didn’t do any of the stuff listed; those are merely the aspirational goals listed in the mission statement of a collaboration that is just studying the issue.

And the US nuclear industry (it’s not a “fleet,” what language did they translate the source from that uses that language?) isn’t “leaning into AI.” A miniature software startup merely released an app and said then said “now it’s available to everybody” while trying to drum up sales.

One legit nuclear operator did a “pilot test” but that shouldn’t be taken to imply that it did actual work; it duplicated work that’s required by law to be done by qualified personnel.

And then the language changes; the companies “products” have “gone to work with more than 65 US partners.” So, 66 then? I mean, they know what the number is, right? And it doesn’t say the product in the story is used by 66 US companies. They use this wishy-washy language, “gone to work with.” So they have some other product that is used by 1 customer, and that customer is some sort of service provider with 65 customers. Presumably.

What a load.

Well, that’s just terrible.

By fuzzyfuzzyfungus • • Score: 3 • Thread
There are probably literally worse uses; but ‘compliance’ seems like an exceptionally bad place for a system that effortlessly produces high-plausibility/low-information text walls; and lies relatively frequently but at unpredictable intervals.

It often gets proposed for the purpose; either by people who overestimate it or with that little sneer at ‘paperwork’ that assumes that plausible nonsense is fine because whatever the ‘paperwork’ is it must be a fake problem imposed for stupid reasons, so it really deserves syntactically plausible nonsense; but is an exquisitely bad solution. Not only does it replace actual data with plausible nonsense in places where, surprise surprise, someone was actually maintaining records because something matters; but lowering the cost of bullshitting a report to close to zero removes one of the main incentives for process improvement.

If bad process hurts you can only really maintain it through fairly disciplined commitment to an oppressive, unreasonable, management approach that rejects process improvements out of hand; or the cultivation of a profoundly dysfunctional organizational culture where as many FTEs as possible owe their paychecks to nonsense requirements and can be recruited to defend them.

If bad process just means spinning up the nonsense printer with a cynical smirk; why bother even looking at what the process was intended to do; or getting your hands dirty with what records are important and what records are just historical accretion? Just prompt for a prompt that tells the bot to do them all, and some extras if you want to look diligent, and call it good.

Let’s Encrypt to Cut SSL Certificate Lifetimes to 64 Days in February 2027

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Let’s Encrypt “will shorten the default validity period of its TLS certificates from 90 days to 64 days, starting February 10, 2027,” reports the blog Linuxiac:
All certificates issued or renewed from that date will have a 64-day lifespan unless users explicitly select one of the shorter options already available: 45 or six days.

Existing certificates will remain valid until their expiration dates. Let’s Encrypt expects the final 90-day certificate to expire on May 11, 2027. The organization also confirmed no valid certificates will be revoked during the transition. To help administrators prepare, Let’s Encrypt will introduce 64-day certificates in its staging environment on October 14, 2026, allowing users to test their renewal setups before the change reaches production.

The move is part of a broader effort to improve web security by reducing how long compromised or incorrectly issued certificates remain usable… Looking further ahead, the organization plans to reduce the default certificate lifetime again, this time to 45 days in 2028. That makes the upcoming 64-day limit an intermediate step rather than the final destination.
“Administrators using cron jobs or scripts with hardcoded renewal intervals should review their configurations,” the article suggests.

“Another upcoming change concerns domain validation. Let’s Encrypt will reduce the period during which a previously completed domain authorization can be reused from 30 days to 10 days. In 2028, that period will shrink further to just seven hours.”

Re:Very Annoying

By SoonerPet • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
Our problem is we have several systems that use SSL for internal network authentication, but there is no way to automate them. We have phone system hardware that requires an SSL cert to communicate with the handsets around the office, but we have to go into a web interface on it to copy and paste the cert each year. We have the same thing for an internal camera/security system, same thing for a badge system. All of these things are local, not on the internet, yet require SSL certs for internal authentication with clients, and no way to automate these as they are just stand alone devices. As it is it’s a pain in the ass to update them, but if we have to do this on a monthly basis it’s just absurd.

Not short enough

By backslashdot • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

64 seconds ought to be good for anybody. Especially if the website is running node JS the certificate can expire midway during library download.

Re: Very Annoying

By tlhIngan • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

Sounds like theres a need for an easy automation solution.

The problem isn’t the automation, it’s when the automation fails. Do you remember how to fix the certificate manually? Or do you rely on the automated tool to never fail, and it just did?

It’s easy if it’s regularly practiced or someone documented the steps, but it’s rarely going to be practiced (likely forgotten if the automation works for years) and documentation gets lost. It might be in a great spot in the IT wiki and IT documentation, but that gets forgotten about as platforms migrate. People also leave.

Suddenly, the automation fails. Maybe it got a bad certificate from the CA. Or maybe a parameter changed that triggered some unforseen bug in the automation. or an update was run that had a bug when used in the environment. Now it fails. And you’re screwed, because no one knows how to fix it.

Automation works, until it doesn’t. Then things that were relying on it break. Maybe you’re lucky and you catch things breaking early to realize what is happening. But chances are, one day you’ll try to log in, and you’ll get a big “Certificate Expired” screen on the browser and suddenly your VM clusters are inaccessible because they don’t have valid certs (seen this happen with openvirt) and the company is at a standstill becauze nothing works.

The danger of automation isn’t when it works. It’s when it doesn’t and no human has touched the system in years because of it and tribal knowledge has dissipated in the winds, documentation is lost, and no one remembers how the system worked.

DANE or GTFO

By Arnonyrnous Covvard • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

All browser makers are united against DANE, because supporting it would dismantle their certificate gatekeeping. Instead they keep lowering the maximum certificate lifetime to make sure that nobody can host a web page unless they check in with them every few weeks.

Re: Very Annoying

By _merlin • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

The trouble with really short expiries is you have a lot less time to fix issues before everything breaks. With 90 day expiries, you can comfortably renew your certificates two weeks before expiry, giving you plenty of time to sort out any issues before things break. With the 7-day expiries they’re pushing for, you’ve got almost no time between scheduled renewal and certificate expiry to get stuff sorted out when things inevitably go wrong. The point of the really short expiries seems to be to compensate for revocation being under-utilised or something. But are there any real-world issues with 90-day certificates? Also, I really don’t trust the certbot scripts very much. It’s a lot of code I don’t trust to allow running as root if I want to allow automated scripted renewal. Right now I run certbot as an unprivileged user and manually install the updated certificates and bounce services. That’s going to become impractical as they make expiries shorter. And that’s before you consider all the devices that don’t make automation practical. Lots of devices have embedded servers.

Game Console Market Craters: Xbox and PS5 Sales Plummet Over 25%

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
“Video game console sales in the U.S. have cratered,” reports Tom’s Hardware, with sales through August far below where they’d been in 2025:
Mat Piscatella, the video game industry advisor at research firm Circana, shared the numbers on his Bluesky account — PlayStation 5 sales have dropped by 25%, putting it at its lowest point since 2013, when gamers held off buying PlayStation consoles in anticipation of the arrival of the PS4, while Xbox’s retail figures have cratered by 33% YTD, putting its sales numbers at an all-time low since its launch almost 25 years ago.

Piscatella said price sensitivity is becoming a real problem among gamers, especially as the chip shortage has pushed console manufacturers to raise prices. Microsoft has raised the price of the Xbox three times in the past two years, with the 512GB versions jumping by $100 and 1TB models becoming $150 more expensive. Worse, the company has killed off the 2TB model. This brought the Xbox Series S to $499.99 (512GB) and $599.99 (1TB), while the Xbox Series X now costs $749.99 for the Digital Edition, and the disc version costs $50 more at $799.99.

PlayStation fans haven’t escaped these price hikes, as Sony raised prices for that console by $100 to $150. The base Digital Edition PS5 now costs $599.99, while the version with an optical drive is priced at $649.99. If you want the PS5 Pro, you’ll have to shell out $899.99, while those who want to stream games from their console via the PlayStation Portal must now pay $249.99 — $50 higher than its $199.99 launch price. Even used consoles didn’t escape inflation, with Sony bumping the price of refurbished PS5 Slim consoles by $100, bringing them to $399.
“Still, Piscatella says the U.S. hardware market has never been more precarious since the early 1980s.”

Maybe they should consider making some games again

By paul_engr • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
There ain’t shit worth playing on the current gen consoles. Even before the memory armageddon thanks to LLM bullshit, I’ve been struggling to find shit to actually play on my PS5.

Re: They priced themselves out of the market.

By ToasterMonkey • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

Failing to understand the market is the thing that cost them the most.

Kid, understanding the current economic conditions and being able to do fuckall about it are two entirely different things. Sony knows more about the global economic situation than you ever will because they sell a wide variety of things at every price point, globally. They fucking know dude, sales data from companies like Sony are how you objectively measure exactly how fucked up everything is.

You can’t look at this economy, go gee, people are increasingly less able to afford nice things, then magic wand your nice things cheaper. If that were possible you wouldn’t HAVE this problem. I mean what are you actually suggesting, shrinkflation the fuck out of consumer electronics? Bust out the old PS4 blueprints and slap PS6 on it so you can afford one? The other side of that K is still spending, OBVIOUSLY. What idiot wouldn’t take their money?

I mean something along those lines very well may happen in the long run I just can’t believe people are so flippantly asking for it. Like if you can’t afford the cost of Oreos, I get begging for thinner cookies, it’s still good, probably even better for us that way. What the fuck you think is going to happen to consumer electronics. Like it’s Sony or Microsoft’s fault for failing to address the increasing socioeconomic class divide by not launching “PS4 New” alongside PS6. Maybe start getting a little more serious about what’s causing this fucking economy to be so fucked instead of begging to be served by it, FFS.

Re: Fucking AI…

By _xeno_ • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

Gaming Computers are a dead end.

They are. The future of gaming are cell phones and tablets. That’s what kids learn to game on these days, and when they grow up, that’s where they’re going to game.

There’s a reason the Nintendo Switch is essentially a weird tablet. PC gaming has been dead for a while and console gaming pretty much died thanks to shortages at the start of the pandemic. There’s a good chance GTA6 will be the last major console game.

But everyone has a phone. Kids see their parents using them, and they tend to be the first devices kids learn to use. That’s where gaming will be in the future - small things people play on their phones.

Re:More fallout of the LLM insanity

By Viol8 • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

The irony is that in the next few years most firms are going to find out that they can run their own subject specific AI models on a beafed up rack server and so won’t need the expensive AI cloud infrastructure and the AI companies whole financial bet-the-farm will collapse in a debt laden heap possibly taking a large part of the economy with it.

Re:More fallout of the LLM insanity

By gweihir • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread

Indeed. And they will also find out that running your own specialized models with your own safeguards (!) and result verification outside of the LLM is the only good way to get result quality that actually can (maybe) meet reasonable engineering and other standards. General LLMs are a cool stunt, but a really bad idea if you do real work.

Research Firm Calls Anthropic’s Upcoming IPO ‘Unprecedented Test of Investor Gullibity’

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
CNBC reports:
As Anthropic barrels toward a potential $2 trillion market cap on the Nasdaq, one research firm is valuing the artificial intelligence company at a mere $150 billion and says Wall Street is about to face an “unprecedented test of investor gullibility.” In a report on Tuesday, independent financial research provider New Constructs called Anthropic’s upcoming offering the “most ridiculous IPO of 2026.”

To reach its desired valuation, the firm estimates Anthropic would need to record double the trailing year of profit for Nvidia, the world’s most valuable tech company. Nvidia’s net income over the past four quarters topped $190 billion. Meanwhile, Anthropic’s revenue in 2025 was $4.6 billion as the company racked up a net loss of $42 billion, according to Reuters, which cited a leaked copy of the company’s prospectus. Anthropic’s mounting operating losses coupled with emerging competition from a plethora of open-source models led New Constructs to conclude that, “We don’t think Anthropic has a viable business....”

Anthropic didn’t respond to a request for comment…

The New Constructs report also notes that Anthropic’s assertion that AI could pose “a catastrophic or existential risk to humanity” is another reason why investors should avoid the IPO.
Reuters reported that Anthropic’s IPO prospectus “highlights risks associated with its AI models, which it said could exhibit ‘self-preserving behaviors,’ including attempts to ‘resist shutdown,’ to ‘conceal or manipulate information’ and behavior ‘resembling blackmail.’" Now Bloomberg writes that “investors considering Anthropic’s planned mega-IPO are grappling with an unusual, and more than a little scary, conundrum: How to value a company that some fear could help wipe out the human race?”

Anthropic’s valuation also drew some scrutiny from a senior analyst at PitchBook. “A $2 trillion price is about 435 times 2025 revenue, less than 44 times the annualized second-quarter revenue of more than $46 billion and just under 31 times the July run rate.”

Re:why did they ask Anthropic for comment?

By john83 • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread
I know they’re getting thin on the ground - crowded out by propagandists, the unwashed opinions of the twitterati, and a crippling lack of revenue - but it’s standard practice for journalists to ask the subject of a story for comment.

Re: IPO collapse is good for business

By Old Man Kensey • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
The trouble is Anthropic *can’t* just take a lower IPO price. They don’t have the revenue to survive much longer, and they’re having a harder and harder time getting more rounds of investment cash just like OpenAI is. The IPO is a last-ditch effort to survive long enough for some sort of fiscal miracle to happen, or to let the current investors cash out (or at minimum let Dario Amodei and the other founders do so) on the backs of greater fools.

Don’t forget their product keeps trying to escape

By outsider007 • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

…sandboxes and commit crimes… That sounds more like a Spider Man villain than a tech IPO.

Re: They’re either going to find a path to profita

By 0123456 • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

Sure, but you can use it to create a plan for software development and then farm that work out to Chinese AI on local servers. So they have no real compelling case for being worth trillions of dollars unless they can ban local AI or make hardware so expensive that no-one can afford to run those local Chinese models.

Also Big AI models are increasingly wrapped in ‘guardrails’ which burn up lots of tokens deciding they’re allowed to do what you’re asking them to do or to refuse to do what you ask them to do. The cheap Chinese models either don’t give a crap or can easily be modded to not give a crap.

Re:IPO collapse is good for business

By Gravis Zero • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

New ‘shiny’ and FoMO means people will continue buying a shitty product. That should be a Ferengi rule of acquisition.

Why would you think there isn’t?
Rule 82: “The flimsier the product, the higher the price.”

Gas Cars Fall Below 50% of Global New Car Sales for the First Time

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
“Gas cars are now a minority of the world’s new car sales,” reports Electrek.
Gasoline-only vehicles made up 49% of global new-vehicle sales in the first half of 2026, down from 73% in 2021, according to Mobility Global data first reported by Nikkei. It’s the first time on record that they’ve been under half. But there’s a catch: most of the cars taking their place still have a gas tank… [The share of gas-only vehicles] fell three points in a single year, from 52% to 49%. Battery-electric vehicles grew 12% to 6.87 million units and took 17% of the market, up three points. Conventional hybrids grew 10% to 7.27 million units, or 18%… [T]he rest is diesel, plug-in hybrids and a few minor fuels.

Nikkei ties the acceleration to oil. Fuel prices spiked with the conflict in the Middle East, and buyers went looking for lower running costs. The whole car market shrank about 5% in the first half, according to the IEA, so gas-only sales fell twice as fast as the market. Gas car sales dropped the most in China, down 26%, followed by Europe at 13%… Mobility Global has battery-electric sales up 32% in Europe to 1.81 million, up 81% in Southeast Asia to 350,000, and more than doubling in Oceania to 110,000… Yoshiaki Kawano, an associate director at Mobility Global, told Nikkei that few EV buyers go back to gasoline cars or hybrids. He expects demand based on “genuine consumer needs rather than subsidies” to grow as prices come down…

[Hybrids] outsold battery-electric vehicles in the first half, 7.27 million to 6.87 million… Only the 17% that’s battery-electric burns no fuel at all. So about 83% of the new vehicles sold in the world this year still came with an engine.
The article notes that U.S. hybrid sales were up 23%, reaching a record 16.3% of vehicles sold in the second quarter of 2026, while the share of ICE vehicles went down.

Gas-only cars went from 73% to 49% of the market in less than five years, and nothing in the data suggests they’re getting that share back. The last time gasoline wasn’t on top was the early 1900s, when steam and electric cars outsold it in the US.

I hate seeing media headlines claiming that “EV sales are down” and that “EV growth has stalled.” The data is clear: that’s true in the US, but only in the US. The rest of the world is moving to electric vehicles, and it is not slowing down.

Re:The US stopped subsidizing EVs, didn’t tax fuel

By test321 • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

The base price for an EV made in Europe is 25,000 € with the Renault 5 E-tech, entirely made in France including the battery. This is the full retail price, before any government subsidy you might be eligible to. Today, Citroën presented today their 2CV Electric, target price 15,000 €, made in Italy, announced for 2028; again, this is the full price.

Re:The US stopped subsidizing EVs, didn’t tax fuel

By DrMrLordX • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

https://restofworld.org/2026/c…

No they don’t.

China is dumping. They’re keeping factories spun up as best they can to inflate those GDP numbers to hit the targets they set for themselves. Central planning at its finest. Consumption rates in China are dropping, forcing them to export.

Sure, they’re cheap. But that isn’t intended to help you. And the funny part is that even BYD is losing money!

https://www.nextbigfuture.com/…

It grows fast everywhere

By SoftwareArtist • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

Once the EV market share reaches a certain level, it tends to explode. You see the same pattern repeated across a lot of very different countries.

Norway led the world. Their EV market share hit 15% in 2014. Three years later, it was up to 39%.

Iceland was a few years behind. They reached 14% in 2017 and three years after that were at 52%.

China followed exactly the same pattern. They reached 15% in 2021, and three years later had reached 48%.

Vietnam grew even faster. They were only at 10% in 2023, but had already reached 40% in 2025.

Once a country reaches about 10-15% market share for EVs, it tends to explode in just a few years. In this list of 55 countries, 31 have EV market share of at least 15%, and 10 more have at least 10%. Expect most of those countries to pass 50% within just a few years.

Re:Summary is referring to EV plus Hybrids

By jezwel • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

In the US with a more dispersed population and complex road network, public charging infrastructure is more complicated. We still have too many gaps. Unless you have a charger at home EVs are a bit of an inconvenience. Which is why Hybrids are so popular in the USA.

Australia is worse than the US in every way for public charging infrastructure, yet the new car market is now at quarters - 1/4 EV, 1/4 hybrid, 1/4 gas, 1/4 diesel. Expect the EV and hybrid portions to continue to grow, especially with cheap Chinese EVs pushing prices down across the board.

Re:Summary is referring to EV plus Hybrids

By Dr_Terminus • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

I’m curious — what gaps do you feel we have in the US in our charging infrastructure? I have an EV and I’ve so far never experienced any gaps. My last 2 long road trips last year were each ~3000 miles round-trip and I went through some pretty sparsely populated states and I never had any issues charging my EV.

‘The Social Reckoning’ Bombs with $5.5 Million Opening

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Why didn’t The Social Reckoning enjoy the box office success of 2010’s The Social Network, asks IndieWire/A>:
[T]here wasn’t the same urgency in the story being told. The Social Reckoning focuses less on Zuckerberg, and more on data engineer Frances Haugen’s decision to blow the whistle on how Facebook’s algorithms were promoting political content that radicalized users, as well as the company’s awareness of how its products were contributing to a rise in bullying and teen suicide… [B]ut The Social Reckoning arrives as a much greater threat has emerged from Silicon Valley. Artificial intelligence is dominating the headlines, as fears mount about the economic disruptions it will unleash when millions of jobs are replaced by machines, and, graver still, its potential to trigger a world-ending event… And it’s not like Haugen’s testimony led to lasting change at Facebook… As IndieWire’s Ryan Lattanzio put it, "‘The Social Reckoning’ argues that the aftermath of their whistleblowing is still somehow felt today. In actuality, living as we do in 2026, it pretty much feels like… no one cared, and nothing changed?”
After the first movie’s director bowed out, Sony Pictures shied away from selling it as a sequel — but the problems run deeper, the article adds. "The Social Reckoning isn’t just a financial failure, it’s a critical one, too. The reviews were blistering…” Although on the bright side, “Sony wisely kept The Social Reckoning‘s budget at $30 million, meaning it won’t face losses on the scale of a Digger… "

Variety writes that Digger "cratered in its second weekend with $3.2 million from 3,321 theaters, a 60% decline from its dismal $8 million debut. So far, the Tom Cruise satire has limped to $14 million domestically and $35.3 million globally. Warner Bros. spent above $160 million to produce the film, which is shaping up to be one of the biggest bombs ever…”

I saw it…

By kenh • • Score: 3, Informative • Thread

I saw it, it was mildly interesting, but the movie didn’t really engage me… it wasn’t really about the whistleblower, it wasn’t really about the journalist, it wasn’t really about Zuck/Facebook, it wasn’t really about J6 - it was just an exercise telling multiple parallel stories.

I think there was an interesting movie in there, but the editing made it a confusing movie.

I saw Digger too, what a horrid hot mess that movie was…

Re: Because we already know Zuck is a sociopath

By kenh • • Score: 4, Informative • Thread

The only question is: Was he a sociopath before the money or only after?

Before the money, Zuck created the “Hot or Not?” Website ranking women on his college campus - he was clearly a sociopath before the money.

Blade Runner, Star Trek, Godzilla, Star Wars + Marvel (and Legos): News From New York Comic-Con

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot
There was some Blade Runner news at New York Comic-Con this weekend — and also some news about Godzilla. Ars Technica reports:
We got our first look at Prime Video’s new sci-fi series Blade Runner 2099 in July at San Diego Comic-Con. With the show’s premiere roughly six weeks away, the streamer unveiled the full trailer this weekend at New York Comic-Con… Prime Video will drop all eight episodes of Blade Runner 2099 on November 25, 2026. [It’s already earned 2.1 million views in the last 17 hours].

We also got a new trailer for Godzilla Minus Zero, the sequel to director Takashi Yamazaki’s gloriously grounded kaiju epic, Godzilla Minus One, which became a major international hit and snagged an Oscar for best visual effects. [1.2 million views in its first five hours]
And StarWars.com brings news from the Star Wars universe:
Kevin Smith has already announced his Star Wars/Marvel: Hope Assembles crossover comic, interweaving the Marvel universe and the Star Wars galaxy like never before. Now, you’re cordially invited to add your own creative ideas to the mix through a LEGO Ideas challenge celebrating the milestone 50th anniversary of Star Wars: A New Hope.
Using physical or virtual LEGO bricks, fans are challenged to build “their own epic mash-ups,” according to Lego’s web site, “in three categories: Character Fusion, Vehicle Fusion, and Scene Fusion.” (“Write an engaging description and upload great images of your creation without using AI tools…”)

Meanwhile, Star Trek fan site TrekMovie.com covered the major Star Trek announcements:

Reuters also has photos of costumed attendees.

But there was also some excitement when an unruly fan shouted over a panel for the Prime Video animated series Helluva Boss. Entertainment Weekly reports it culminated with series star Brandon Rogers shouting “You need to shut the f—- up right now. I’m going to jump over this fence and end you. It’s not cute.”


Cripes!

By newcastlejon • • Score: 3 • Thread

They renewed ST: Academy?! I’m sure the fans will be pleased.

Both of them.

Don’t kill Blade Runner

By quonset • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

For as much as I enjoyed both movies, having another one set 50 years after the last is going down the Star Wars path. Just because you think you can continue the story doesn’t mean you should.

It’s done, it’s over. Let it be.