Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. US Set To Receive $10 Billion Fee For Brokering TikTok Deal
  2. How a Species Evolved Fast Enough to Save Itself from Extinction
  3. AI’s Productivity Boost? Just 16 Minutes Per Week, Claims Study
  4. U.S. State Bans on Lab-Grown Meats Challenged in Court
  5. Meta Plans Sweeping Layoffs As AI Costs Mount
  6. Two Long-Lost Episodes of ‘Doctor Who’ Found
  7. ChatGPT, Other Chatbots Approved For Official Use In the Senate
  8. Instagram Discontinues End-To-End Encryption For DMs
  9. Qatar Helium Shutdown Puts Chip Supply Chain On a Two-Week Clock
  10. Don’t Get Used To Cheap AI
  11. Digg Relaunch Fails
  12. Backblaze Hosts 314 Trillion Digits of Pi Online
  13. Meta Delays Rollout of New AI Model After Performance Concerns
  14. Live Nation Execs Brag About ‘Robbing’ Ticket Buyers In Slack DMs
  15. Apple’s App Store In China Gets Lower 25% Commission To Appease Regulators

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

US Set To Receive $10 Billion Fee For Brokering TikTok Deal

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
The deal to take control of TikTok’s U.S. business came with an unusual condition, according to people familiar with the matter. The investors — which include Oracle, Abu Dhabi investor MGX, and private-equity firm Silver Lake — “paid the Treasury Department about $2.5 billion when the deal closed in January,” reports the Wall Street Journal, “and are set to make several additional payments until hitting the $10 billion total.”
The $10 billion payment would be nearly unprecedented for a government helping arrange a transaction, historians have said… Investment bankers advising on a typical deal receive fees of less than 1% of the transaction value, and the percentage generally gets smaller as the deal size increases. Bank of America is in line to make some $130 million for advising railroad operator Norfolk Southern on its $71.5 billion sale to Union Pacific, one of the largest fees on record for a single bank on a deal. Administration officials have said the fee is justified given Trump’s role in saving TikTok in the U.S. and navigating negotiations with China to get the deal done while addressing the security concerns of lawmakers…

The TikTok fee extracted from private-sector investors is the administration’s latest transaction involving the nation’s largest businesses. Trump took a nearly 10% stake in semiconductor company Intel and has agreed to take a chunk of chip sales to China from Nvidia in exchange for granting export licenses. The administration has also taken equity stakes in other companies and has a say in the operations of U.S. Steel following a “golden share” agreement with Japan’s Nippon Steel in its takeover.
Reuters notes earlier this month, a lawsuit was filed by investors in two of TikTok’s social media rivals, seeking to reverse the approval of the deal.

Thanks to long-time Slashdot reader schwit1 for sharing the news.

Trump set to receive 10 billion dollar fee

By rsilvergun • Score: 3 Thread
These kind of fees can be easily redirected into slush funds that can then be used directly by Trump. He’s not so brazen yet to just pocket the money himself that’s coming in his third term but what he can do is use it as a slush fund to hand out money to people who will then give some of it back in the form of bribery. He can also use it for off the books Black ops stuff like what Reagan did with the money he got from selling drugs.

The real problem is nobody gives a shit about the scale of corruption going on. 20 years ago a republican even doing this shit would have such a huge scandal they would already be out the door. Now we have the Wall Street journal talking about Trump openly selling pardons to the tune of billions of dollars and we all just shrug because 40% of the country still loves Trump more than anything.

How a Species Evolved Fast Enough to Save Itself from Extinction

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
California saw its worst drought in 10,000 years between 2012 and 2015, remembers the Washington Post. And yet genetic analyses of California’s scarlet monkeyflower “found that many rapidly evolved… allowing them to cope with water scarcity and rebound from decline.”
“The fact that certain organisms are able to adapt just because of genetics that are already present is a great source of hope,” said Daniel Anstett, a plant biologist at Cornell University and lead author on a new study on the issue. “It’s one more arrow in the quiver of different ways that populations might be able to survive the massive climate change we’re inflicting on the planet.” The recovery of [Sequoia National Park’s] scarlet monkeyflowers offers rare, real-world evidence of what scientists call “evolutionary rescue,” according to the study published Thursday in the journal Science. It suggests that some species may be able to evolve quickly enough to keep up with the accelerating consequences of human-caused warming — essentially saving themselves from extinction.

This discovery could help people decide how to distribute limited conservation funds by pinpointing which species have enough genetic diversity to be resilient, ecologists Mark Urban and Laurinne Balstad, who were not involved in the study, wrote in a separate analysis published by Science. “The challenge going forward is to identify when evolutionary rescue is possible, when it is not, and how to rescue those species that cannot rescue themselves,” Urban and Balstad wrote.

AI’s Productivity Boost? Just 16 Minutes Per Week, Claims Study

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“A new study suggests the productivity boost from AI may be far smaller than executives claim,” writes Slashdot reader BrianFagioli:
According to research cited in Foxit’s State of Document Intelligence report, while 89% of executives and 79% of end users say AI tools make them feel more productive, the actual time savings shrink dramatically once people account for reviewing and validating AI-generated output.

The survey of 1,000 desk-based workers and 400 executives in the United States and United Kingdom found executives believe AI saves them about 4.6 hours per week, but they spend roughly 4 hours and 20 minutes verifying those results. End users reported a similar pattern, estimating 3.6 hours saved but 3 hours and 50 minutes spent reviewing AI work. Once that “verification burden” is factored in, executives gain just 16 minutes per week, while end users actually lose about 14 minutes.

I remember a time when…

By MpVpRb • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

…the same questions were asked about CAD
Salespeople sold CAD to management as reducing the time it took to make drawings
Engineers saw it differently
Back when it was hard to make or change drawings with a pencil, we made less of them. The effort required to redraw a complex drawing was so great that only the most necessary changes were made
With CAD, we could easily make lots of drawings with many different versions of an idea, and then pick the best one
CAD didn’t increase “productivity”, it increased quality of designs

Ok, but hear me out…

By eepok • Score: 3 Thread

If we increase our investment just 10-fold, we could probably get that to 16 minutes per day. Imagine the possibilities!

Probably very polarized results..

By Junta • Score: 3 Thread

So as presented it *sounds* like the typical respondent thought they spent about as much time as it saved and the numbers were fairly big.

I’m skeptical that a survey of self-reported experience would manifest that way. I wager that some said 9 hours saved with barely anything needed and some said 9 hours of fixing the mistakes and no time saved, and that instead of ‘16 minutes per week’, you just have slightly more people annoyed by it than enthusiastic about it.

My guess is that it wildly varies by the job and situation. People for whom it works badly for are looking around and wondering what the hell is wrong with the people advocating, and the people for whom it works are amazed at the time savings, and given the current hype the former people are forced to do it anyway, even as it is terrible.

For example, a discussion arose where developer mentioned they could make a quick tool to take care of something that was likely to be an issue for users if folks wanted it. An executive declared “no need, I just had Claude make the tool for me in like 2 minutes, and I’ll share with everyone”. That executive felt *incredibly* empowered, they didn’t know how to code and they used the tool and the result of the tool in the AI generated sandbox looked right. Then folks tried the tool and it failed horribly because it didn’t have any actual clue about the technology to manage, it managed only to make a tool and sandbox for it to demo in that was consistent with the desired narrative, with no whiff that the results had no relationship to the documentation site included in the executive’s prompt. Further, if it *had* worked, it would have broken a number of security mechanisms based on how it *tried* to do things. However, the executive would never feel the consequences, they unleashed their ‘awesome tool’ and the grunts had to clean up the mess and bringing that back up to executives to ask them to stop doing that stuff is a very risky move employment wise, and they’ll not believe you anyway, it’s just a conspiracy to keep our jobs after all…

Even when it is being reasonably useful, it’s annoyingly prone to mistakes, randomly screwing up even if it’s being asked to do the same easy little thing it has done successfully the last 12 times in a row in other contexts. Leaving you feeling a bit gaslight as you see the internet gushing about how unbelievably impossibly good Claude Opus 4.6 is after you just spent a week using your work’s budget on that premium model to see if at least *they* are on to something and still finding a pretty annoying experience while Anthropic is crowing that they have all but finished off the job of software developer.

YMMV, a lot!

By LeDopore • Score: 3 Thread

A friend of mine is doing a hardware startup with 2 people that he says would have taken at least 3 extra coders pre-AI. He and his partner are doing the valuable EE and mechanical parts of the business. A lot of the software they need is not what’s differentiating their startup, and AI is just fine. For them, it sounds like AI is giving a 150% productivity gain, and without it their business idea would only be marginally viable.

Use dependent

By Chewbacon • Score: 3 Thread

My use case is reading a summarizing contracts and scientific articles. Now, while I’m spending time coming up with prompts and reading responses, I might as well read the stuff myself and become personally familiar with it. However where AI helps me is conversing about it, like you would with a team. So if I’m between customers on the road, I can feed it into AI and ask questions in voice mode, review the answers later. That’s my gain and arguably a lot more than 16 minutes.

U.S. State Bans on Lab-Grown Meats Challenged in Court

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Last June Texas Agriculture Commissioner Sid Miller said in a statement that Texans “have a God-given right to know what’s on their plate, and for millions of Texans, it better come from a pasture, not a lab. It’s plain cowboy logic that we must safeguard our real, authentic meat industry from synthetic alternatives.”

But California company Wildtype sells lab-grown salmon — and is suing Texas over its ban on cell-cultivated meat, the Austin Chronicle reported this week. The company’s founder says lab-grown salmon eliminates the mercury, microplastic, and antibiotic contamination commonly found in seafood. And one chef in Austin, Texas says lab-grown salmon is “awesome” and “something new”— at the only Texas restaurant that was serving it last summer:
Just two months after the salmon hit the menu, Texas banned the sale of cell-cultivated meat… A lawsuit from Wildtype and one other FDA-approved cultivated meat company [argues] it’s anti-capitalism and unconstitutional… This law “was not enacted to protect the health and safety of Texas consumers — indeed, it allows the continued distribution of cultivated meat to consumers so long as it is not sold. Instead, SB 261 was enacted to stifle the growth of the cultivated meat industry to protect Texas’ conventional agricultural industry from innovative competition that is exclusively based outside of Texas....” [according to the lawsuit]. It was filed in September, immediately after the ban took effect, and cell-cultivated companies are awaiting judgment.
That Texas ban would last two years, notes U.S. News and World Reports, adding that Alabama, Florida, Indiana, Mississippi, Montana, and Nebraska have also passed bans, some temporary “on the manufacturing, sale or distribution of cell-cultured meat.” Meanwhile, a new five-year moratorium on lab-grown meat was signed this week by the governor of South Dakota “after rejecting a permanent ban last month,” reports South Dakota Searchlight:
The new law bars the sale, manufacture or distribution of “cell-cultured protein” products from July 1 this year through June 30, 2031. Violations are punishable by up to 30 days in jail, a fine of up to $500, or both.
“But supporters of lab-grown meat are not going down without a fight,” adds U.S. News and World Reports, with another lawsuit also filed challenging a ban in Florida:
When Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis signed the ban in Florida, he described it as “fighting back against the global elite’s plan to force the world to eat meat grown in a petri dish or bugs to achieve their authoritarian goals.” He added that his administration “will save our beef.”

The free market party

By Valgrus Thunderaxe • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
will save you from yourself.

Re:The free market party

By rsilvergun • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
Bullshit. They are saving beef producers from competition.

Not that I particularly want lab grown meat. I’m a vegetarian because I don’t particularly like the taste of the meat. Not because of health or saving animals.

I do like to think that a properly advanced civilization wouldn’t need to kill intelligent beings to eat. But I mean if it’s one thing the last two years have shown me is that we are not a properly advanced civilization… So I can’t exactly blame us.

If Toby Seba’s prediction pans out

By Clouseau2 • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

He predicted in 2024 that by 2035 large scale raising of animals is going to go away. Small & medium boutique operations will remain for those wanting to enjoy eating meat at luxury prices.

Lab grown meat is already at parity with the cost of a regular burger patty. If they can get it down to 1/2 or even 1/3 we’ll see if those bans hold up.

The Strait of Hormuz is currently closed indefinitely and it’s not just oil and natural gas which flows through there but a significant percentage of inputs for farms. If these labs are less affected by these skyrocketing prices they may not even need to make the process more efficient.

Beef prices are currently high because the number of cattle is low. One reason is Texas may not be able to supply enough water to supply homes, datacenters, ranches AND growing animal feed. Most food in the USA is grown to feed animals. “To raise a steer takes enough water to float a destroyer.”

California is finally out of drought but California has long-term water issues as well. Central Valley farmers are draining ground water at such a fast rate that land is sinking and threatening the California Aqueduct, which farms, businesses and 27 million people depend on.

Meta Plans Sweeping Layoffs As AI Costs Mount

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Reuters:
Meta is planning sweeping layoffs that could affect 20% or more of the company, three sources familiar with the matter told Reuters, as Meta seeks to offset costly artificial intelligence infrastructure bets and prepare for greater efficiency brought about by AI-assisted workers. No date has been set for the cuts and the magnitude has not been finalized, the people said. Top executives have recently signaled the plans to other senior leaders at Meta and told them to begin planning how to pare back, two of the people said. If Meta settles on the 20% figure, the layoffs will be the company’s most significant since a restructuring in late 2022 and early 2023 that it dubbed the “year of efficiency.” It employed nearly 79,000 people as of December 31, according to its latest filing.
The speculation follows a recent report from The New York Times claiming that Meta has delayed the release of its next major AI model after falling behind competing systems from Google, OpenAI, and Anthropic.

Wow

By liqu1d • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Perhaps AI will do some good and kill meta…

Reminder

By jrnvk • Score: 5, Informative Thread

20% of Meta’s salaries is still a fraction of the cost of just one of their proposed data centers. Two things are true here: 1) AI is stupidly expensive and has no meaningful ROI (financially speaking). 2) Layoffs are continued to be blamed on AI, when poor decisions by humans are actually to blame.

Re:Slashdot’s pincer movement

By Some Guy • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Some ublock rules I use for this which might help:

slashdot.org##div[id=announcement]
slashdot.org##div[id=mdb-sticky]
slashdot.org##div[id=sitewide-top-banner-placeholder]
slashdot.org##div[id=vibe-coding-bar]

Sorry I can’t do much about all the pseudo-“AI” horseshit though.

How Many Companies Are Being Run Using AI?

By classiclantern • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
I don’t know what Normal People think about AI but we here on Slashdot have seen this coming for several years now. The comments on this story alone can be summed-up as, I told you so. This sequence of moves from Meta is exactly what I expect from a company who’s management gets instructions from AI. In other words, the Stock Owners prompt AI with, How can we maximize profits? The AI has zero regard for People and recommends a pump-and-dump stock manipulation scheme which advances AI’s control over the company at the expense of jobs, product quality and privacy. The needs of humans are never a priority for AI. Companies have treated Workers as a commodity since COVID. I seem to recall this same story in a dystopian movie back in the 80s. Managers haven’t yet realized that their management jobs are one of the easiest to replace. My question now is, who does the SEC put in jail when AI runs all the companies? No wait, that will never happen. The SEC is also run by AI.

Re:May Meta choke on its AI savings bet

By burtosis • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
The natural conclusion given the premise is that 99.99% of humans will no longer be needed and can be removed making way for paradise on earth. No longer will they be a persistent thorn in the side and leach away the money they earn from the company. No longer will their incessant whining about being treated fairly darken the day. No longer will laws restrain the company from maximizing profits. It will truly be glorious and the brightest future possible. You will own nothing and the Epstein class will be happy.

Two Long-Lost Episodes of ‘Doctor Who’ Found

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Longtime Slashdot reader tsuliga writes:
Two new episodes of Doctor Who that were previously lost have been found. The original Doctor Who episodes were wiped or deleted by the BBC because they were not aware of the future use of re-runs of these shows. Ninety-five of the 253 episodes from the program’s first six years are currently missing. How many more episodes are out there waiting to be rediscovered?
“The main broadcasters in the UK in the 1960s, 70s, up to the 80s really, junked quite a lot of content,” said Justin Smith, a cinema professor at England’s De Montfort University and film archivist. “In some ways finding missing ‘Doctor Whos’ is the holy grail” of classic TV discoveries, Smith said.
The two episodes were “The Nightmare Begins” and “Devil’s Planet,” both of which aired during the show’s third series in 1965. It features William Hartnell as the Doctor in a story involving archvillains the Daleks — pepperpot-shaped metal aggressors whose favorite word is “Exterminate!” Smith said that for fans of the show, “it’s got it all, it really has. It is intergalactic, it’s got some great performances. It stands up really, really well.”

At last

By ukoda • Score: 5, Funny Thread
It seems like so long since we had some good news. Finally we have Daleks in the news instead of AI or politics.

Re:Dr Who Sucks

By ukoda • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Your view of it probably has a bit to do with you age. When it come out in the 1960’s it was probably the first Sci-Fi that had an alien that didn’t look like a guy in a rubber suit, or a guy in a robot suit. In that sense the Daleks were pretty novel. Of course all the other Dr Who aliens did look like a guy dressed up. In today’s context it is not the revolution it was 6 decades ago, but the stories do have style to them that long time viewers appreciate.

And were else would you get this classic dialogue https://www.youtube.com/watch?… ?

Cyber Leader: Daleks, be warned. You have declared war upon the Cybermen.
Dalek Sec: This is not war - this is pest control!
Cyber Leader: We have five million Cybermen. How many are you?
Dalek Sec: Four.
Cyber Leader: You would destroy the Cybermen with four Daleks?
Dalek Sec: We would destroy the Cybermen with one Dalek! You are superior in only one respect.
Cyber Leader: What is that?
Dalek Sec: You are better at dying.”

Archival status

By BigBadBus • Score: 5, Informative Thread
There’s a graphical guide for what survives from the first three doctors at http://www.paullee.com/drwho

Here’s the missing info

By michaelmalak • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
The media format is 16mm film. Here’s the irony. Unlike U.S. television shows, BBC was an early adopter of video tape. (Recall that video tape was invented really late, available in 1956; everything before then had to be either live or telecined from film live.) But when shipping shows to far-flung international destinations, BBC “transferred” the video tape to film by filming a TV! That’s what was found in the collector’s cardboard box. That BBC used video tape is what allowed them to erase said video tapes.

Re:The evil BBC deliberately DESTROYED Dr Who

By ObliviousGnat • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
Science Fiction has often been socially progressive, for example Kirk & Uhura’s interracial kiss, and how in Star Trek the pursuit of wealth is no longer the driving force in people’s lives. Sci-fi writers are not limited by today’s politics, they have much more freedom to explore the human condition. It is in that context that we should judge Doctor Who.

ChatGPT, Other Chatbots Approved For Official Use In the Senate

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from the New York Times:
A top Senate administrator on Monday gave aides the green light to use three artificial intelligence chatbots for official work, a reflection of how widespread the use of the products has become in workplaces around the globe. The chief information officer for the Senate sergeant-at-arms, who oversees the chamber’s computers as well as security, said in a one-page memo reviewed by The New York Times that aides could use Google’s Gemini chat, OpenAI’s ChatGPT or Microsoft Copilot, which is already integrated into Senate platforms.

Copilot “can help with routine Senate work, including drafting and editing documents, summarizing information, preparing talking points and briefing material, and conducting research and analysis,” the memo said. The document later added that “data shared with Copilot Chat stays within the secure Microsoft 365 Government environment and is protected by the same controls that safeguard other Senate data.”
It’s unclear how widely AI is used in the Senate or how widespread it might become, as individual offices and committees set their own rules. The chamber has also not publicly released comprehensive guidance on chatbots, the report notes.
In contrast, the House has clearer policies allowing the general use of AI for limited internal tasks but restricting it from sensitive data or for being used for deepfakes and certain decision-making activities.

Can’t be worse

By cusco • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Can’t be worse than their regular work output. Who knows, we might accidentally even get a law proposed that benefits someone besides the ultra-rich. (I know, I know, but I can dream, can’t i?)

Re: Can’t be worse

By liqu1d • Score: 5, Funny Thread
Yeah seems like a tool for generating words without any understanding of what it’s generating would be able to replace a lot of the senate… not sure we’d notice.

Excellent

By Mr. Dollar Ton • Score: 3 Thread

Now we will know which senator uses Gemini, they’ll end every statement of theirs with a question.

Instagram Discontinues End-To-End Encryption For DMs

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Meta plans to remove end-to-end encryption (E2EE) from Instagram direct messages by May 8, 2026. “Very few people were opting in to end-to-end encrypted messaging in DMs, so we’re removing this option from Instagram in the coming months,” says Meta. “Anyone who wants to keep messaging with end-to-end encryption can easily do that on WhatsApp.” The Hacker News reports:
The American company first began testing E2EE for Instagram direct messages in 2021 as part of CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s “privacy-focused vision for social networking.” The feature is currently “only available in some areas” and is not enabled by default. Weeks into the Russo-Ukrainian war in February 2022, the company made encrypted direct messaging available to all adult users in both countries.
Last week, TikTok said it would not introduce E2EE, arguing it makes users less safe by preventing police and safety teams from being able to read direct messages if needed.

I remember the times…

By ffkom • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
… when the media every so often told us the horror-stories from behind the Iron Curtain, where the evil Stasi or the KGB spied on their own people, and did so as lessons about the difference between “free” and authoritarian countries. But now it seems the “cold war” was thoroughly won by the Warsaw pact states, at least with regards to spreading that habit of excessive eavesdropping on everyone all around the globe.

In two minds about this

By thegarbz • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

On the one hand, why is this opt in? Why remove it when it’s trivial to maintain? Why not remove the non-encrypted features?

On the other hand… it’s Instagram. I see no option to encrypt DMs, no evidence that they are encrypted. I used Instagram for messages every so often and this is literally the first story I heard about it being encrypted.

Ironically Facebook sucks at marketing.

Re:In two minds about this

By MunchMunch • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
The unstated but obvious reason they are taking the time to remove it is because they want to train their LLMs on the messages.

Re:I remember the times…

By sinkskinkshrieks • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
People forget Snowden and PRISM because there’s a Trumpstein war afoot to distract from the pedo Trumpstein files and the disbandment of counterterrorism units to invite more excuses.

Re:I remember the times…

By sound+vision • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

I wonder how many more distractions until China decides it’s the right time to take Taiwan. Troops tied up in Iran and the whole Navy on tanker escort duty sounds like it would be a great time.

Might be a good idea, if you are considering buying any electronics, appliances, or motor vehicles, to do it as soon as possible.

Qatar Helium Shutdown Puts Chip Supply Chain On a Two-Week Clock

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Iranian drone strikes shut down a major helium facility in Qatar, removing about 30% of global helium supply and raising concerns for the semiconductor industry, which relies on the gas for chip fabrication. “QatarEnergy declared force majeure on existing contracts on March 4, freeing it from supply obligations to customers,” reports Tom’s Hardware. The industry outlet Gasworld reports that no imminent restart is planned. From the report:
Helium consultant Phil Kornbluth, speaking at a Gasworld webinar on March 4, said that if the outage extends beyond roughly two weeks, industrial gas distributors could be forced to relocate cryogenic equipment and revalidate supplier relationships, a process that could stretch over months regardless of when Qatari output resumes.

South Korea is among the most exposed countries, which, according to the Korea International Trade Association, imported 64.7% of its helium from Qatar in 2025. The country relies heavily on helium imports to cool silicon wafers during fabrication and is understood to have no viable substitute.

The country’s Ministry of Trade, Industry and Resources has reportedly launched an investigation into supply and demand for 14 semiconductor materials and equipment types with high dependence on Middle Eastern sources, Nikkei reported on Wednesday. Bromine, which is used in circuit formation, is another big concern, with South Korea sourcing 90% of its imports from Israel, also party to the ongoing conflict in Iran.

Re:Not surprised

By test321 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

that’s totally self inflicted “zero inventory” manufacturing BS that financial engineers choose to engage in.

Today I’ll make an exception and defend the beancounters.

For the past decades, the world operated under the assumption that the major leaders wanted peace, and took competent advice on geopolitics. Supporting Israel to remain a sizeable regional power was enough to “keep Iran from doing something stupid”. Iran bombing critical Qatari facilities was therefore a low risk, and industries calculated their needs based on that. This is part of what got us the incredibly inexpensive electronics we had just yesterday.

The rationale and the calculations only changed now that “the US doing something stupid” became a possibility. It’s easy to ask, why not 1 month or 2 months of storage of critical materials. The thing is there are way too many critical materials in complex industries to store. It’s only feasible for industries whose costs are protected, like defence. In a market pushed by consumer goods where people click on the cheapest deal, it isn’t feasible.

Or you need strong regulations to oblige companies to do so. But while you can compel Western companies e.g. “Intel” to increase their costs and take stocks, you can’t reach foreign competitors; you’re just giving more advantage to the products made by the likes of Longsoon and MediaTek.

Re:Helium can be re-used?

By johnnys • Score: 5, Informative Thread

It can be. It’s just going to cost money.

Purifying Helium is simple in principle: Just make it VERY cold. Every other element or molecule will turn to liquid or solid and can be drained or filtered away. What’s left is pure helium. The problem is that it takes a significant amount of energy and technical effort to get the temperature down to where it needs to be. You have to get it down to between 4.2 and 20.28 Kelvin to really get it purified.

So it’s all about cost. If you go to the effort and cost to collect all the helium gas used in the manufacturing and recycle it, then there’s no shortage. But it costs money.

Also note that Helium is a renewable resource. It comes from the alpha decay of radioisotopes deep in the Earth’s crust and collects in gas pockets that can be mined for it. So we’re not doomed if a little of it is wasted: But we should be careful with it anyway.

Re:Bye bye delusions

By caseih • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Yes you’re right. One militaristic state has indeed brought down the entire edifice of interconnectedness. But I don’t think it’s the one you imply.

As represented by this administration, there is very little moral window dressing now. They don’t even try. Heck the president is talking openly about eugenics. Everything old is new again.

So yes. Perpetual war is inevitable in this post-global, tribal world we now have. So you hope the US “wins” somehow. And then what?

Re:Helium can be re-used?

By cmseagle • Score: 5, Informative Thread

3He is normal helium atom with an extra neutron

3He is an isotope of Helium with one fewer neutron than the normal 4He.

Re:Helium can be re-used?

By Rei • Score: 5, Informative Thread

At one point I looked into helium extraction as a byproduct of liquid oxygen/nitrogen plants, which are pretty common globally (neon, argon, krypton and xenon are already produced as a byproduct of them;. By volume, He is ~4x as common as Kr and ~58x as common as Xe, and is easy to separate from the other noble gases (though by mass, He is only 20% as common as Kr, 1,8x as common as Xe). But it’s historically been much more expensive way to produce helium than from fossil sources, where it accumulates to normally 20-200x as concentrated as in the atmosphere, ~1000x in economical deposits (helium can also accumulate in e.g. geothermal gases)

Helium prices start at ~$100/kg / ~$20/l and go up from there. Krypton prices start at ~$400/kg / ~$1500/l and go up from there. Xenon starts at ~$2100/kg / ~$12000/l and goes up from there (in all cases, things like purity greatly affect the costs). So to compute ($/kg) / relative gravimetric abundance and ($/l) / relative volumetric abundance:

He: ~100, ~20
Kr: ~2000, ~400
Xe: ~1100, ~213

So some naive trend extrapolation would suggest that producing helium from air this way would cost about an order of magnitude more than it does from fossil resources (though the actual number would be a lot more complex to determine than that… helium is easy to separate from other noble gases, to its advantage, but also price isn’t going to be a linear relation to abundance, and also, if you don’t have as much demand for the other gases being recovered, then their prices will drop and helium’s will rise)

TL/DR: natural gas does us a lot of favours in terms of keeping helium prices down :)

Don’t Get Used To Cheap AI

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
AI services may not stay cheap for long, as companies like OpenAI and Anthropic are currently subsidizing usage to rapidly grow market share. As these companies move toward profitability and potential IPOs, Axios reports that investors will likely push them to increase prices and improve margins. An anonymous reader shares an excerpt from the report:
Flashback: Silicon Valley has seen this movie before. The so-called "millennial lifestyle subsidy" meant VC money helped underwrite cheap Uber rides and DoorDash deliveries. Before that, Amazon built its base with low prices, free shipping and, for years, no sales tax in most states. Eventually, all of these companies had to charge enough to cover costs — and make a profit.

Follow the money: The current iteration of AI subsidies won’t last forever. Both OpenAI and Anthropic are widely expected to go public. Public investors will demand earnings growth and expanding margins. Even as chips get more efficient, total spending keeps rising. Labs need more capacity, more upgrades and more supply to meet demand.

The bottom line: The costs of AI will keep going down. But total spend from customers will need to keep going up if AI companies are going to become profitable and investors are ever going to get returns on their massive investments.

No shit

By liqu1d • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
The only question is will it stay cheap enough to still replace people or will it be increased until it’s no longer economical.

Re: No shit

By SeaFox • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

First one, then the other.

AI companies hoping by then there will be enough platform lock-in and hassle to transition to human-powered production they don’t try and go back.

Distorted reality.

By devslash0 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

If AI execs think that most people would pay for AI, then they are truly delusional. We only do it because it’s free and/or forced upon us.

Besides, our occasional use of your tools doesn’t justify paying a subscription for it.

If you start charging, or charging more, we’ll go somewhere else, even if that means reddit or StackOverflow. I’m sure they’d welcome us back with open arms.

No problem.

By newcastlejon • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
I’ve never used it and I never plan to
Yet, thanks to skyrocketing RAM prices, I’ve still had to pay for it.

Re: No shit

By Rei • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Reality: neither.

Inference costs for a given capability level have been declining exponentially with a mean halving time of 7,5 months over the past 3 1/2 years - and show no signs of stopping.

From *independent small-scale inference hosts*, API pricing - e.g. guaranteed to not be subsidizing inference - frontier-scale open models are commonly served for less than $1/Mtok input-output averaged (the main cost is in output). This is an order of magnitude less than the closed models charge, because the closed model providers profit hand-over-fist on their inference, and use that to subsidize the general (non-paying) public. But the real cost is low. DeepSeek is believed to be providing inference on their platform (for a 671B-param model) at-cost, and they charge $0.028/Mtok-in (cache hit) / $0.28/Mtok-in (cache miss) / $0,42/Mtok-out. Independent providers are somewhat - but not dramatically - more expensive serving the same model due to the need to earn a sustainable profit margin.

A question like “What is the capital of Madagascar?” might involve under 100 tokens. “Write the entire next chapter of my novel” might be tens of thousands. It’s hard to give a specific number, but if we say 1000 tokens, If we go pessimistic and choose $1/Mtok, then serving a flagship model (with many hundreds of billions of parameters) costs about a tenth of a penny per query. But models can still be useful for general chatbot uses all the way down to a few billion parameters (a hundredth of a penny per query), and for less general uses (for example, summarization) down well below that.

These are not some sort of gigantic cost. And remember: the cost for a given quality level has a trend of halving every 7,5 months.

The notion that you’re going to get AI to go away by being “no longer economical” is, quite simply, fantasy. The flagship model producers make money on inference. They’re actually quite profitable business lines. They lose money as a company because they’re sinking such vast sums into R&D and scaleup.

Digg Relaunch Fails

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
sdinfoserv writes:
After running a Reddit clone for a couple of months, the Digg beta shut down again. The website is a splash memo from CEO Justin Mezzell, blaming the latest “Hard Reset” on bots.
“Building on the internet in 2026 is different,” writes Mezzell. “We learned that the hard way. Today we’re sharing difficult news: we’ve made the decision to significantly downsize the Digg team…”
The decision was made after struggling to gain traction and an overwhelming influx of AI-driven bots and spam. “When the Digg beta launched, we immediately noticed posts from SEO spammers noting that Digg still carried meaningful Google link authority,” says Mezzell. “Within hours, we got a taste of what we’d only heard rumors about. The internet is now populated, in meaningful part, by sophisticated AI agents and automated accounts. We knew bots were part of the landscape, but we didn’t appreciate the scale, sophistication, or speed at which they’d find us.”

“We banned tens of thousands of accounts. We deployed internal tooling and industry-standard external vendors. None of it was enough. When you can’t trust that the votes, the comments, and the engagement you’re seeing are real, you’ve lost the foundation a community platform is built on.”

Despite the setback, Digg plans to rebuild with a smaller team, with founder Kevin Rose returning to work full-time on a new direction for the platform. “Starting the first week of April, Kevin will be putting his focus back on the company he built twenty+ years ago,” writes Mezzell. “He’ll continue as an advisor to True Ventures, but Digg will be his primary focus.”

Slashback: The Rise of Digg.com

Slashdot should rejoice!

By Anonymous Coward • Score: 5, Funny Thread

It’s actually more relevant than Digg!

Re:Slashdot should rejoice!

By Waffle Iron • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

It’s actually more relevant than Digg!

I originally thought that this website’s decision to not allow new users to sign up was incredibly stupid and would result in a death spiral. Lately, though, I’ve started to think that there may be no other viable choice.

Re:Slashdot method

By FunkSoulBrother • Score: 5, Informative Thread

This is actually the answer though. SomethingAwful (for whatever you think of it) charges $10 since forever and its provided money for the site and for the most part kept out spam and bots. Combine that with human moderators who have the authority to ban people (or robots) if they pay that and start acting like a piece of shit anyway, and you walk away with a decent online community.

Re: Slashdot should rejoice!

By timeOday • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
Hmmmm, does that mean my account is now a scarce resource that will skyrocket in value? I’ll start the bidding at $50k.

Raises hand

By fahrbot-bot • Score: 4, Funny Thread

At this point, shouldn’t it be renamed “Dugg”?

Backblaze Hosts 314 Trillion Digits of Pi Online

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
BrianFagioli shares a report from NERDS.xyz:
Cloud storage company Backblaze has partnered with StorageReview to make a massive dataset containing 314 trillion digits of Pi publicly accessible. The digits were calculated by StorageReview in December 2025 after months of heavy computation designed to stress modern hardware. The dataset now hosted in the cloud weighs in at over 130TB, while the full working dataset used during the calculation reached about 2.1PB when intermediate checkpoints were included.
The report notes that the Pi digits have been broken into roughly 200GB chunks to make it more practical for researchers or enthusiasts to download.
Here’s what StorageReview founder Brian Beeler said about the project: “Pushing [Pi] to 314 trillion digits was far more than a headline number. It was a sustained, months-long computational challenge that stressed every layer of modern infrastructure, from high core-count CPUs to massive high-speed storage, and it gave us valuable insight into how extreme, real-world workloads behave at scale. Making this dataset available in the Backblaze cloud takes the project a step further by opening access to one of the largest raw outputs ever generated in a single-system calculation. Hosting multi-petabyte files for the broader community is no small feat, and we appreciate Backblaze stepping up to ensure researchers, developers, and enthusiasts can explore and build on this record-setting achievement.”

Confirmed

By battingly • Score: 5, Funny Thread

I just checked it on my TI calculator and confirmed the digits are correct.

Re:Good thing they don’t have more!

By Anonymous Coward • Score: 5, Funny Thread
Is that a rational decision?

Spoiler alert

By Kamineko • Score: 4, Funny Thread

Spoilers: it’s three and a bit.

Re:Is it actually PI?

By ebcdic • Score: 5, Informative Thread

There is a (relatively slow) algorithm for finding the Nth digit of pi, which can be used to check the last few digits calculated. If the last digits match, the chance of there being an error is negligible. Look up the “Bailey-Borwein-Plouffe formula”.

ridiculous precision

By Tom • Score: 3 Thread

If the math is correct, that means we can calculate the circumference of the known universe to a precision much, much smaller than the Plank length.

So in other words: No, there isn’t any practical application for this, not now, not in the forseable future, and probably not before the heat death of the universe.

Meta Delays Rollout of New AI Model After Performance Concerns

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Meta has delayed the release of its next major AI model after internal tests showed it lagging behind competing systems from Google, OpenAI, and Anthropic. The New York Times reports:
The model, code-named Avocado, outperformed Meta’s previous A.I. model and did better than Google’s Gemini 2.5 model from March, two of the people said. But it has not performed as strongly as Gemini 3.0 from November, they said. As a result, Meta has delayed Avocado’s release to at least May from this month, the people said. They added that the leaders of Meta’s A.I. division had instead discussed temporarily licensing Gemini to power the company’s A.I. products, though no decisions have been reached.

[…] It takes time to improve A.I. models, and Meta can still catch up to rivals, A.I. experts said. But a longer timeline has set in at the company, with Mr. Zuckerberg tempering expectations for Avocado in the past few months. “I expect our first models will be good, but more importantly will show the rapid trajectory we’re on,” he said on a call with investors in January.
A Meta spokesperson said in a statement: “As we’ve said publicly, our next model will be good but, more importantly, show the rapid trajectory we’re on, and then we’ll steadily push the frontier over the course of the year as we continue to release new models. We’re excited for people to see what we’ve been cooking very soon.”

The AI IQ asymptote is coming

By greytree • Score: 3 Thread
The AI IQ asymptote is coming and will take down all the AI-heavy companies.

Let’s hope their bankruptcies don’t have too much effect on real businesses built on real numbers.

And of course: GPU, HDD, SSD and RAM fire sales !

Live Nation Execs Brag About ‘Robbing’ Ticket Buyers In Slack DMs

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Pitchfork:
Earlier this week, the U.S. Department of Justice and Live Nation reached a settlement in the DOJ’s antitrust lawsuit against the concert giant. During the trial, which lasted only a week, representatives for Live Nation had moved to exclude a collection of Slack direct messages from 2022 between two of the company’s regional directors from the evidence presented to the jury. Bloomberg and a number of other publications have, as of today (March 12), successfully petitioned New York federal judge Arun Subramanian to release the chats.

The conversations are between Ben Baker, now head of ticketing for Venue Nation, and Jeff Weinhold, currently a senior director in the ticketing department. Baker and Weinhold joke about overcharging and price-gouging fans — “Robbing them blind, baby,” Baker brags in one exchange pertaining to a Kid Rock show in Tampa Bay — as well as being able to raise prices on ancillary services such as parking seemingly at will. “These people are so stupid,” Baker writes. “I almost feel bad taking advantage of them BAHAHAHAHAHA.”
Live Nation described the messages as “off-the-cuff banter, not policy, decision-making, or facts of consequence.” In a statement the company has since added: “The Slack exchange from one junior staffer to a friend absolutely doesn’t reflect our values or how we operate.”

Truth.

By msauve • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
>“The Slack exchange from one junior staffer to a friend absolutely doesn’t reflect our values or how we operate.”

… even if it is true.

Re:values

By fahrbot-bot • Score: 5, Funny Thread

money is fine but someone (or someones) should be publicly tortured to death. that might send a message.

Ya, but guess who’d be selling the tickets to that event - making even more money off poetic justice?

Similar issue at one of my previous employers

By bunyip • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Some years back, I was working for a large software company. One of their clients sued them, I don’t remember the exact amount but I recall it being at least in the tens of millions. When it finally went to court, the customer’s attorney’s said that they’‘d put my company’s C-level execs on the stand and have them read their profanity laced emails. Quotes like, “We need to drive f....g stake through [their] heart”, etc.My company settled immediately.

A few months later, at an executive off-site, they brought in an attorney that lectured about 100 of us, basically that anything you put in email is subject to discovery. Don’t write anything you wouldn’t say in fron of your mother, or wouldn’t want to see on the front page of the Wall St. Journal.

Re: Truth.

By frdmfghtr • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Oh yes it does reflect your values or how you operate, because the talk matched the walk. Not all “values” are set in corporate mission statements, some are just simple common sense and respect. This was an officer of the company, thus he represents the company’s values. If not, then his ass would have been fired.

To say otherwise is just boilerplate attempts at PR damage control.

Re:Not shocked at all..

By YetanotherUID • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Also, the middle man are why the artist even have a venue to play at. The venue chooses to go with ticketmaster so they don’t have to deal with that aspect. Without ticketmaster, we could very well have an app per venue. What a headache that would be.

BULL. FUCKING. SHIT.

The venues existed LONG before Ticketmaster/LN did, and they did just fine booking acts and selling tickets. And they did it without apps of any kind. Just because you are too lazy to pick up the phone and call the box office to purchase a ticket doesn’t mean that everyone else is, too.

But wait, you can’t do that anymore because LN, in the same contracts they use now in most cases contractually REQUIRES venues to sell exclusively through LN with their fees even at the box office. And that’s only in the venues that aren’t owned outright by LN, usually as the result of predatory and coercive tactics used to acquire them. And these days, that’s most music venues that are larger than a bar and smaller than an arena.

LN is also so vertically integrated that even in venues they don’t own, they prohibit independent concessioneers and even parking. And LN sets the prices for ALL of that.

And oh yeah, did I forget to mention that they also typically require the acts that sell tickets through them to sign exclusivity contracts as well? It’s a devil’s bargain - either sign with us or forget about 90+% of the venues out there. This means that acts that fall anywhere between local bar/college hoppers and Taylor Swift/Pearl Jam, essentially have to sell through Live Nation, or they simply can’t put on a tour.

This is the definition of monopolistic, predatory behavior.

Apple’s App Store In China Gets Lower 25% Commission To Appease Regulators

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot
Apple will cut its App Store commission in China from 30% to 25% starting March 15, with small-business and mini-app rates dropping from 15% to 12%. AppleInsider reports:
Chinese regulators have been back and forth with Apple in recent years over the 30% App Store commission. The latest publicly known pressure occurred after President Trump slammed the country with seemingly random and outrageous tariffs in 2025. While nothing much else has happened in the public eye in the year since, Apple has announced a new commission rate via its developer blog. The new rates go into effect on March 15.

The current standard 30% rate is dropping to 25% for in-app purchases and paid app transactions. The Small Business Program and Mini Apps Partner Program will see rates drop from 15% to 12%. That lower rate applies to auto-renewals of in-app purchase subscriptions after the first year. Mini Apps are for transactions found in super apps like those popularized in China. […] Developers will need to sign the updated terms, but the new rates are applied automatically. It is unclear if these new changes will prevent regulatory action from China.

Most favored nation?

By SirSpanksALot • Score: 3 Thread
Sounds like we need most favored nation on App Stores too… You shouldn’t be able to charge a higher commission on your American app store than anywhere else in the world.