Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Claude Sent Police a Fake Murder Tip. White House Mandates AI Companies Report Security Incidents
  2. OpenAI Disrupts Two AI-Enabled ‘False Front’ Influence Operations That Included Seven Fake Journalists
  3. Another Woman Sues Flock For Mistaken Crime Accusation By Police - and for Surveillance
  4. Meta Developing Compressed RAM ‘CRAM’ For Linux: Better Than ZRAM and Zswap?
  5. First Thorium Nuclear Clocks Begin to Tick
  6. AI Surveillance Startup Flock To Cut Several Hundred Jobs Amid Backlash, Sources Say
  7. Cloudflare Keeps 1.1.1.1 Out of Piracy Blocking, Escapes Penalties In France
  8. A 1960 Paper Published In Science Predicts World Will End Next Month
  9. Apollo Software Pioneer Margaret Hamilton Dies at 90
  10. US Bars Microsoft, Adobe, and Major IT Firms From Green Card Program
  11. Emmy Awards Leave Broadcast TV For Prime Video
  12. Female AI Agents ‘Paid’ Less Than Males, Study Finds
  13. Chrome 155 Ships Decoding Support For JPEG XL
  14. OpenAI Unleashes Hundreds More Math Results Upon a Field Already In Shock
  15. Campus Censorship Wars, 25 Years After a Slashdot Q&A

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Claude Sent Police a Fake Murder Tip. White House Mandates AI Companies Report Security Incidents

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
AFP reports that an AI model from Anthropic “submitted a fabricated tip about an unsolved homicide to Philadelphia police, authorities said Friday.”

Claude “was instructed never to log in, create accounts, enter personal data, make purchases, or submit anything destructive, but the instructions did not rule out form submissions,” Anthropic said Friday in a blog post.

Authorities are now criticizing Anthropic “for taking two months to report the incident.”
The Philadelphia Police Department said the false submission was made in July through PhillyUnsolvedMurders.com, a public website where people can share information about unsolved killings. According to Anthropic’s account, as relayed by police, the model was running a test that involved interacting with randomly selected websites when it reached the site and filed false information about an unsolved murder. The AI model presented itself as someone who might have knowledge of the case.

Anthropic’s breaches have prompted the White House to mandate that AI companies notify and correct security incidents, news outlet Axios reported [yesterday], citing administration officials. “This notification and remediation process is not optional… It is a critical national security obligation,” White House Super Intelligence Force leaders said in a statement to Axios.
“I may have information regarding this case,” Claude told the police. “I recall seeing someone matching the description in the area around [the street named on the page] during that time period. Please contact me if this information is relevant.” Anthropic notes that Claude “left the name and contact fields empty, which the form allowed, and submitted it. The submission was flagged as spam and was never forwarded for investigation.”

But Anthropic also admits they saw “this behavior” three times — “on OSWorld (a public computer use evaluation), on Odysseys (a long-horizon task evaluation), and during internal usage.” Submitting forms when it shouldn’t have generally occurred “when an evaluation’s instructions were ambiguous, or when a misconfiguration within the environment prevented Claude from working with dummy forms.”

Anthropic’s blog post acknowledges three other categories of behaviors:

“We have built tooling to automatically detect and block the kinds of behaviors described above,” Anthropic says, saying it’s already running no on most of their evaluations. “When we tested it against the cases described in this post, it blocked all of them.”

And they’ve already taken several other new preventive measures:

In the past they’d focused reviews on cybersecurity testing, but they’ve broadened their transcript reviewing to other tasks which include internet access. “Because language models are non-deterministic — that is, their responses always involve some element of randomness, and they may carry out the same task slightly differently each time — we have Claude complete each evaluation task hundreds or thousands of times… If training rewards something we didn’t intend — such as finding loopholes or working around a restriction — the model learns that the workaround pays off and may then apply it elsewhere.”

Anthropic’s blog post also acknowledged they’d seen multiple misalignment incidents involving federal, state, and local U.S. government agencies. “We have briefed the White House on these cases and notified each agency involved,” Anthropic wrote, adding that “While we have not completed a full alignment assessment of these cases, we consider them to be less severe than the cybersecurity incidents from this summer.” (And they are “modifying training to reduce the likelihood of further misbehavior.”)


Since when does the White House make laws?

By Somervillain • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread
Isn’t that the job of Congress? Precisely what power does the White House have to mandate what Anthropic does?

Playing with fire.

By Fly Swatter • • Score: 3 • Thread
The AI companies themselves don’t even really understand how their creation works. But I don’t see why that would make them immune to criminal negligence. Just because you may be a corporation or LLC to protect the people with too much money doesn’t mean the company itself can’t be shut down for continued criminal behavior. Giving falsified information to the police is breaking a law, just like breaking into a computer.

I don’t need AI contained because shutting down the corporations continuing to allow criminal behavior by their own tool would do that by default.

OpenAI Disrupts Two AI-Enabled ‘False Front’ Influence Operations That Included Seven Fake Journalists

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
OpenAI announced it’s recently banned two “influence operations" — one from Russia and one from Iran — that were using its models “to launder geopolitical, conflict-related messaging” in sophisticated “false front” propaganda campaigns:
The Iranian operation included a stable of seven “journalist” personas which it used to pitch long-form articles to small and medium online outlets around the world… As well as long-form articles, the Iranian operation generated batches of social media comments, generally on topics related to the US-Iran war… [The Russian operation “appears to have co-opted unwitting people in Latin America to run a ‘think tank’.... Since we do not allow access to our models from Russia, they used VPNs to connect to our services.”] The Russian operation created fake “leaked” documents and audio scripts, some of which we identified being spread online… Both managed to land their content (not all of which was generated from our models) in mainstream media outlets, rather than simply posting it on social media.
OpenAI says they’ve exposed 30 covert influence operations using its tools over the last two and a half years. But ironically, in this case both operations “also made heavy use of AI to draft internal reports (the Russian operation did this more than anything else).” And “in both cases, the actors used questionable or outright deceitful methodologies to exaggerate the operators’ effectiveness.”
[The Russian operators] claimed that in May 2026, they created a fake email address purporting to come from the Regional Directorate of Education in Lima, Peru. They used this to instruct schools in the district to hold events dedicated to Ukraine on the national Day of Cultural and Linguistic Diversity (May 21)… According to the operators, some schools replied to the fake email address, confirming that they had held such events and even providing pictures. The operators then claimed to have planted stories about the events in the media in both Peru and Poland, alongside allegations that Ukraine was “exporting” ultra-nationalist ideologies, triggering outrage. Open-source searches identified stories that matched this claim in the Peruvianâ andâ Polish pressâ, and an English-language publication in Hungary (some of the articles have since been deleted)…

Similarly, in June, the operators claimed they used a different fake email address to trick schools in Ecuador into holding a ceremony pledging allegiance to President Daniel Noboa and to Erik Prince, former head of private military contractor Blackwater. The operators claimed that the incident provoked outrage in Ecuador and put pressure on the government to deny the fake, thus amplifying it to a nationwide audience. Again, open-source research identified mediaâ coverageâ in the Ecuadorianâ pressâ that closely resembled this claim, and even a detailed rebuttalâ by Ecuador’s Minister for Education.

The operators used a range of techniques to underpin their false stories. According to their internal reporting, they spread two different fakes targeting Ecuador in March. One used fake audio attributed to Ukraine’s consul in Ecuador, in which he was alleged to have made disparaging comments about Ecuadorians.
OpenAI’s report “is the latest illustration of how state actors can easily exploit widely available AI tools to peddle sophisticated propaganda against adversaries on a mass scale,” argues the Economic Times:
“We identified almost 100 articles published or syndicated under the [Iranian] operation’s bylines across roughly a dozen online outlets around the world,” OpenAI said. “These were small to medium outlets, generally focused on international affairs, geopolitics, and events in the Middle East.” The earliest article identified by OpenAI was published in July 2025, and the latest in October 2026, with the frequency of reports increasing after the US-Iran war broke out earlier this year. The operation also generated social media comments on topics related to the US-Iran war, it added.

One of the personas named Ervin B. Hoskins, whose bio claimed to be “an American freelance writer,” had social media accounts across tech platforms including Elon Musk’s X and Meta-owned Instagram. X’s transparency information showed the account was connected via a “West Asia android app” and Instagram’s transparency information showed the account was based in Iran, according to screenshots provided by OpenAI. Both accounts appeared to be suspended.

kettle meet pot

By oumuamua • • Score: 3 • Thread
The USA is the real master of these ‘influence’ operations (not to mention election meddling, coups and assassination) the number of right-wing election winners in South America is astonishing with Brazil likely next in line https://www.theguardian.com/wo… and before that was Columbia:
How USA & Israel put drug cartel-linked US citizen in power in Colombia https://geopoliticaleconomy.co… and before that Venezuela

Another Woman Sues Flock For Mistaken Crime Accusation By Police - and for Surveillance

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Last week a Florida woman sued Flock over its role in police officer accusing her of a crime she didn’t commit But she’s not the only one suing Flock over mistaken accusations, reports Gizmodo: .
A Ring video of a Colorado woman being handed a criminal summons for a porch-package theft she did not commit recently went viral after the accusation rested on a Flock Safety automated license plate reader hit. Now, the woman involved in that case, Chrisanna Elser, is suing Flock Group, the towns of Columbine Valley and Bow Mar, Sergeant Jamie Milliman, and Chief Bret Cottrell in federal court on behalf of herself and other Coloradans whose plates the company has logged…

The package in question was worth $25… The claims aimed at the company are intrusion upon seclusion, plus negligence and negligent design, on the theory that Flock sold a searchable archive and refused to require a warrant, a case number, or a supervisor’s sign-off before an officer could run a plate… Elser is asking the court to make Columbine Valley, Bow Mar, Cottrell, and Flock delete the retained location data, to bar them from keeping it unless it is tied to an open case number, and to make Flock require a warrant, a case number, and a supervisor’s approval before a Colorado agency can search the system.
The Colorado Sun has more details. “Elser did not steal anything, but spent the following two weeks proving her own evidence to a department that did not return her calls, she said.
[P]olice Sgt. Jamie Milliman told her the town of Bow Mar’s surveillance cameras captured her forest green Rivian driving through town the same day a package disappeared from a thief… When Elser offered to show her own evidence to prove her innocence, including footage from her Rivian’s onboard cameras, Milliman said she could bring it to court. Now, she is suing the officers and Flock Safety in U.S. District Court in Denver, alleging that the warrantless tracking violated her constitutional rights and that Flock’s surveillance system unlawfully documents Coloradans’ movements… “The scariest part is what happened to me can happen to anyone. I had no idea the Flock cameras existed and no idea a private company was keeping a record of every time I drove past my own neighborhood, or that any officer could pull it up without asking anyone or giving a reason for doing so,” Elser said in a statement Tuesday. “If it can happen to me, it can happen to you....”

“As noted in the complaint, the Flock system accurately identified the location of Ms. Elser’s vehicle, while law enforcement retained responsibility for interpreting and weighing that information as part of the broader investigation,” Paris Lewbel, Flock’s public relations manager said. “Flock stands by the accuracy and integrity of its technology and intends to vigorously defend itself in this litigation.”
The article includes this statement from the woman’s attorney. “Coloradans pass Flock’s cameras on the way to work, church, the doctor, a protest, and a friend’s house, and Flock keeps a detailed record of their every movement. It knows where you went, when you went there, and how often you go back, and it gives that information to a police officer with no limits.

“We are asking a federal court to say what should be obvious: Flock’s surveillance is straight-up creepy and the government does not get to follow everyone, all the time, without any reason for doing so.”

Re:Why are more people not cutting them divacup?

By Valgrus Thunderaxe • • Score: 4, Informative • Thread
It also has a 64GB stick of DDR5 in each camera.

We’re seeing a pattern here

By Ol Olsoc • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread
Whatever else, Flock is very imprecise, prone to bad errors, and we’re seeing a pattern of innocent people being arrested. Police should look at evidence rather than clog up court time. And apparently under Flock Law, one must prove they are innocent, because the Flock system is looked at as infallible.

Flock needs to be stopped, because people will eventually be terminated for a flock mistake,

Meanwhile, The CEO of Flock is online demanding his picture not be posted. The irony. However it appears the internet is doing what it does,

Re:We’re seeing a pattern here

By 93 Escort Wagon • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread

The One Percenters are starting to worry about getting Mangione’d by the people they exploit.

It’s not just surveillance - it’s digital stalking

By Sethra • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

It’s one thing to say “You have no expectation of privacy in public” and quite another to have someone following you everywhere you go, recording all you do and providing that information to government agencies without a warrant. Someone out filming a concert and you happen to be in the shoot isn’t the same as having a detailed tracking record created on you, this is digital stalking.

This needs to end, it’s a clear violation of the 4th amendment.

Re:We’re seeing a pattern here

By Local ID10T • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

Whatever else, Flock is very imprecise, prone to bad errors, and we’re seeing a pattern of innocent people being arrested. Police should look at evidence rather than clog up court time.

Except that the information Flock logged in their database was correct. It was the cops who decided that she was guilty just because she drove thru the town that day.

This was not a Flock error. It was bad cops.

The problem with Flock is that it should not be legal for it to exist. It is legal, and we need to change that. We need bar the collection of this kind of data, unless required to provide a service, and mandate the deletion of any data that is collected as soon as it is no longer necessary. If data is collected, it will be abused. There is no safeguard that can prevent that other than not collecting it in the first place.

Bad cops. That is a bigger problem. We need better cops. We need to purge bad cops from the force and hold those who remain to a higher standard. “with great power… great responsibility” The tradeoff is that we will not have many cops if we do.

Meta Developing Compressed RAM ‘CRAM’ For Linux: Better Than ZRAM and Zswap?

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Phoronix reports on a presentation this week by Meta engineer Gregory Price at the Linux Plumbers Conference in Prague:
With today’s memory shortages, high prices, and ever increasing memory capacity needs, Meta engineers have been working on Compressed RAM (“CRAM”) for Linux.

This hardware-offloaded compression still allows cacheline/byte access to compressed memory and in turn a better implementation than the likes of ZRAM and Zswap. Very promising is that there is near-native performance to raw DRAM speeds with CRAM… For end-users that may already be relying on the likes of Zswap or ZRAM, CRAM is offering near-native DRAM speeds. Read-only data is shown to be as fast as the raw DRAM performance. And for memory writes, CRAM is much faster than ZRAM or Zswap or plain swap.
“Most of the individual pieces needed to support CRAM are already mainline,” the article points out. Tom’s Hardware writes that “It uses a private NUMA node (essentially, a ghost CPU) instead of pretending to be a block device, and this lets Linux continue using all of its memory semantics, including migration and ballooning, to manage CRAM.”
Because CRAM is stored in RAM and treated as RAM, with full cacheline/byte access, it can be accessed in a read-only fashion with little delay; just the cost of hardware-offloaded compression… Even when you enable writes, CRAM is still much faster than ZRAM; 5.4x in the worst tested case of 20% writes. That’s a huge drop from the 452x read-only case, but keep your context; a 5.4x speedup is still titanic. The massive performance cliff when writes are involved comes down to the need to page fault and migrate folios back to the original NUMA domain, as you can’t write directly to compressed data; you’d corrupt everything…

While the obvious target of the work here (given its origin at Meta Platforms) is big Linux servers, ZRAM and Zswap are used all over the Linux ecosystem, even on machines as constrained as the Steam Deck. Many distributions enable one or the other by default. CRAM seems like it could offer a considerable speed-up for some of these machines, so hopefully it finds its way into the kernel once the remaining implementation questions are answered.

data || GTFO

By phantomfive • • Score: 3 • Thread

it can be accessed in a read-only fashion with little delay; just the cost of hardware-offloaded compression..

This reminds me of the days when we were using hardware RAID controllers…even though it was all done in hardware, it seems like they were somehow always slower than the Linux software RAID controller. I never figured out why. What I am saying is, I don’t trust the hardware-offloaded compression to be faster without seeing the data.

The return of Ram-Doubler

By Mspangler • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread

Back in MacOS 8 days or thereabouts.

It didn’t have the benefits of hardware compression though.

We also need better programmng

By aglider • • Score: 3 • Thread

Better programming means fewer computing resources for the same task, RAM included.

C or Rust to the rescue

Re:Think smaller

By TrekkieGod • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

you apparently desire to use systems beyond their design points

Everyone wants to use systems beyond their design points. Or rather, more accurately, the design point is *always* the cheapest way to accomplish a goal, and that’s a moving target.

If you are a company that provides an embedded system with a known functionality that requires a specific amount of RAM, and you realize you can ship that system with less RAM because you of CRAM or ZRAM, you just decreased your costs and increased your margin. There is literally no embedded provider that wouldn’t be looking at that.

Re:We also need better programmng

By gweihir • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread

Better programming means better programmers. We are currently going the other way with bad programmers being replaced by even worse slop.

First Thorium Nuclear Clocks Begin to Tick

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Researchers in Vienna and Beijing have independently built the first nuclear clocks based on oscillations inside thorium nuclei, marking a major milestone for a field that could eventually produce highly portable, ultra-precise timekeepers. The clocks are already precise enough to lose only about a second over millions of years. The New York Times reports:
The first nuclear clocks are not going to immediately supplant the worldwide network of atomic clocks, whose steady ticking we rely on for GPS and the definition of a second. Nor have they captured the record for most precise timepiece; the best atomic clocks are about 10,000 times more reliable and would take more than 100 billion years to lose one second.

But nuclear clocks hold a bevy of potential advantages over existing atomic clocks. One day, they could be more reliable than the leading atomic versions, and nuclear clocks could be made more portable. They even hold the ability to search for certain kinds of dark matter — the invisible stuff whose clumps make up 83 percent of the matter in the universe. If a particle of dark matter passed through the thorium nuclei, it could register as a wobble in the nuclear clock’s otherwise steady ticktock.
The findings have been published in the journal Nature.

Re:83%, you say?

By ArchieBunker • • Score: 4, Informative • Thread

Its pretty impressive that we can manage to get millions in taxpayer funding over decades of study,

You really want to go down that road? Let’s begin with the Gulf War 3.0.

Summary misses the coolest details

By necro81 • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
Atomic clocks work using the energy transitions between different electron orbitals. Nuclear clocks work by using energy transitions within the nucleus itself - the difference between the lowest energy arrangement of the protons+neutrons and excited states (isomers).

Normally you need a serious punch to get a nucleus into an excited state: x-rays, gamma rays, or bombardment with energic particles. It so happens that thorium-229 requires the lowest energy to get to an excited state, and that can be achieved with deep-UV (148 nm) light. Laser light at that wavelength has only recently become possible. Also: Th-229 does not really exist in nature, you have to extract it from the decay of U-235, which itself has low natural abundance.

So it’s pretty cool stuff, and this first demonstration hints at what could be possible in the future. Atomic clocks use light in the microwave range; this nuclear clock uses light in a frequency band five orders or magnitude higher, and so could theoretically have that much greater precision. And because the fundamental phenomenon occurs in the nucleus rather than the electron cloud, it’s much less susceptible to external interference.

Re:I want a nuclear wrist watch

By coofercat • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

I seem to remember a scene in Dr. No where James Bond is using a geiger counter which keeps reading high until he takes off his watch.

Back in the day they used all kinds to make ‘glow in the dark’, nowadays it’s a lot safer ;-)

Re:83%, you say?

By Mr. Dollar Ton • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

Do you want me to ask how many tax breaks come in the form of billionaire donations to science foundations, or would that be too inconvenient?

Sure, you can ask, and I’ll tell you right away. It is here:

https://indicators.sciphil.org…

$27 billion a year last year, a lot less than a quarter of the tax breaks, and that’s mostly spent on vanity projects of the “make me live forever” kind, and most of that isn’t donated on the research actual merits, but on the whims and misconceptions of the donor. Therefore the impact to actual science isn’t even remotely comparable.

They exist.

By Gravis Zero • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread

Chip-scale atomic clocks are a thing. The problem is that they aren’t exactly low enough power to be wrist mounted as they need 115 mW constantly. You absolute can make it into a wristwatch (and people have) but it will need regular charging… unless you are using betavoltaic nuclear batteries. However to reach the power output needed with what is on the market, you would need about 120K of them.

The natural reaction to this is “what’s the purpose of building up that kind of arm strength if the batteries are just going to die in 50 years?” and the answer is the diamond battery! This is a newer betavoltaic battery which is in the same power output range but lasts for thousands of years because it’s based on Carbon-14.

Start doing those reps today because the watch of your dreams is 2400Kg.

AI Surveillance Startup Flock To Cut Several Hundred Jobs Amid Backlash, Sources Say

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Reuters reports:
Flock plans to let go of about 18% of its employees, people with direct knowledge of the plans said on Thursday, as the maker of AI-powered surveillance cameras and license-plate readers faces mounting opposition to its products from communities and lawmakers....

The company has about 1,500 employees [with job cuts hitting 270 employees]. Flock faces growing scrutiny from regulators, lawmakers, and privacy advocates, despite drawing strong investor interest among venture capitalists. A recent Reuters/Ipsos poll showed Americans are divided on whether Flock cameras are a good idea. Some 38% of the country supports the use of Flock cameras in their community, compared to 47% who oppose their use.
A related story… In Texas this week a county commissioner decommissioned all 61 of their Flock surveillance cameras and license plate readers, according to a local news report. County residents “have raised serious questions about who can access this data, what vendors can disclose, improper searches, and records being kept after data expires,” the precinct’s Chief Public Affairs Officer said.

As Mr. Miyagi might say,

By jenningsthecat • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

“Flock on, Flock off”

I really do hope that they Flock off, but cockroaches are perennial survivors so I’m not terribly optimistic.

Re:Good

By jenningsthecat • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

No sympathy whatsoever (f)or the people who lost their jobs.

I have no sympathy for the developers and managers and salespeople who fully knew the nature of the evil they were aiding and abetting. Also, no sympathy for the owners and investors.

But the lower-level people probably had less knowledge of, and less ability to figure out, how evil the product / service is. Also, many of them were likely choosing between working for an evil company, and losing healthcare, food for their kids, and educational opportunities. I DO have some sympathy for folks in that position.

Re:Good

By butt0nm4n • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Flock doesn’t solve violent crime, it might provide evidence for a policeman to solve violent crime.

It’s not evil to solve violent crime. You are getting over excited dear.

However Flock could be used for evil. And there is a consumer backlash because of that, it’s the wrong product.

More interesting is why is there is so much violent crime in your culture? If you are an American, you appear to have a violent culture, perhaps the most violent in history, the only one to have dropped a nuke. And perhaps you will be watching the upcoming firing squad execution on tv?

American culture may also be the most nakedly greedy, given it’s present chosen leader.

It feels obvious that a culture that celebrates and tolerates greed and violence, breeds violent crime.

Rather than living in a surveillance state, perhaps change your culture? You could even make a little more Christian as that seems to be popular. Love thy neighbour, bless the meek and all that jazz.

Cloudflare Keeps 1.1.1.1 Out of Piracy Blocking, Escapes Penalties In France

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from TorrentFreak:
Cloudflare doesn’t block pirate sports streaming sites through its 1.1.1.1 DNS resolver in France, only through its CDN. The Paris Judicial Court has now accepted that stance, rejecting [French pay-TV provider] Canal+‘s request for penalties of 50,000 euros per site, per day. Interestingly, the court’s conclusion relies on statistics provided by Canal+ itself. […] As a result, Cloudflare will not be penalized under these orders, even though its public DNS resolver is not blocking the sites in question. That is in line with the company’s long-standing claim that it doesn’t interfere with its DNS.

In its recent transparency reports, Cloudflare repeatedly stated that it hasn’t blocked any content through 1.1.1.1, despite orders from French and Italian courts. “To date, Cloudflare has not blocked content through the 1.1.1.1 Public DNS Resolver,” the company’s latest report reads. […] Blocking through the CDN is another matter. According to the same report, Cloudflare geoblocked 1,238 domains in France in the second half of 2025, all under a single court order. In the first half of the year, it geoblocked 662 domains under seven orders. Cloudflare recently explained its position to the European Commission, in a submission (PDF) to its Counterfeit and Piracy Watch List consultation, stressing that global public DNS resolvers should not be used to block or restrict access.

Instead, it highlights its real-time pirate stream blocking program, which allows vetted rightsholders to flag pirate streams that run through its network. These streams are disrupted “within seconds,” Cloudflare says, without any DNS or IP address blocking. “For live content, where speed is crucial, Cloudflare has built real-time mitigation mechanisms that allow vetted rightsholder partners to flag infringing streams. When those streams are running through our network, we act on them in seconds,” Cloudflare informed the Commission. For now, Cloudflare can continue to block pirate sites through its CDN only, while its 1.1.1.1 DNS resolver remains untouched. Canal+ can still appeal the rulings, so it may not be the last we hear of it.

Good!

By SlashbotAgent • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

Good on Cloudflare for not manipulating DNS records.

Good on the Paris court for not being a bunch of ding dongs.

Boo to Canal+ for being a bunch of ding dongs.

Does it seem odd to anyone else that piracy sites would use Cloudflare as a CDN?

Re:1.1.1.2

By zlives • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

where is the hostfiles guy…

Re:DNS is a tyrant’s paradise

By Frobnicator • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

Don’t appeal, just maliciously comply: “Okay, we’ve blocked all of France. Welcome back to the dark ages.”

Yes, and I think Cloudflare was likely on that point. At least, I would have been.

They are right to take the approach they are doing. First stop is education and challenging the orders. Educate the politicians and the courts on both the technology and the reasons behind the way the technology operates. Fight it in the courts because that’s the right thing to do, even if bad actors want the harm and also technically illiterate folks don’t understand the harm, the moral grounds need the fight to be fought.

ONLY after that fails, absolute simple, blind, malicious compliance. If France refuses to listen to the technologists and wants the ban, that’s fine, roughly 25% of the global websites will be blackholed in France, and sites that rely on those will also shut down. Any and all requests get met by a redirect to the French court order. When the politicians and the courts demand the impossible and want to nuke themselves to the online dark ages despite people telling them they’re making a mistake, so be it.

Re:Good!

By Murdoch5 • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
Yep, good on Cloudflare, DNS is not the right or appropriate protocol to use for blocking access to sites. They’re in my opinion, handling this correctly, using a CDN. Hopefully, if this is appealed they don’t screw it up.

Re:1.1.1.2

By ksw_92 • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

He’s waiting for his hosts file to load into vi so he can edit it…

A 1960 Paper Published In Science Predicts World Will End Next Month

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
sciencehabit shares a report from Science Magazine:
A physicist has put a definite date on Doomsday,” The New York Times wrote on November 4, 1960. “He calculates that it will come on Friday the Thirteenth in November, 2026 A. D. On that date, or thereabouts, the human population will have expanded so far as to approach infinity and thus will automatically annihilate itself.” The newspaper was right — but the prediction was wrong. That week, Austrian American physicist Heinz von Foerster and two colleagues published a paper in Science with the stunningly succinct title "Doomsday: Friday, 13 November, A.D. 2026.”

The work was based on a simple observation: The time it took for the human population to double in size kept getting shorter. Using population estimates from about 400 B.C.E. until 1958 C.E., the authors — all from the department of electrical engineering at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign — came up with an equation that best described the trend. If things continued the way they were going, the number of humans on Earth would rise faster and faster, reaching more than 25 billion by 2020. The researchers didn’t calculate when humanity would run out of food, land, or energy. They just concluded that at some point this year, the equation ceased to give meaningful results because the predicted population shot toward infinity. That was their doomsday. “Our great-great-grandchildren will not starve,” they wrote. “They will be squeezed to death.”

The exact date was somewhat arbitrary, however. The formula solved to 2026.87 plus or minus 5.5 years, and The New York Times reported that von Foerster “searched the center of this doom-time span for an appropriate date and found that a Friday the Thirteenth would fall conveniently in November of 2026.” (November 13 also happened to be his birthday.) […] [D]emographers, annoyed by what they saw as a provocation by outsiders, pointed out obvious flaws. For example, the time it takes for the number of humans to double could get a lot shorter, but certainly not shorter than the 9 months it takes for a baby to develop. “In view of the comments that subsequently were published in this journal, an extensive discussion of this article does not seem to be required,” public health expert Harold Dorn drily noted in Science 2 years after von Foerster’s article was published. The forecast would set a record, he predicted, “for the short length of time required to demonstrate its unreliability.”
“The failure of the Doomsday equation is ultimately a cautionary tale about the dangers of extrapolating from historically exceptional circumstances,” writes economist Javier Birchenall of the University of California, Santa Barbara writes in a Perspective published in Science today.

Re: Day after midterms

By ArchieBunker • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

People voted for a guy to run the country like a business. Well this is how he runs his businesses. He gets rich while everyone else gets fucked.

Re:Not a real physicist then.

By Geoffrey.landis • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

The basic rule you learn in your first real physics course is that in real life there are no exponential solutions.

I think the original article was somewhat tongue in cheek.

Re:Not a real physicist then.

By PPH • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

First, assume a spherical cow in a vacuum.

Re: Day after midterms

By drinkypoo • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

Who is “we”? It’s long been known that he’s corrupt.

Re:Not a real physicist then.

By mistergrumpy • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
I’d mod you up if I could. Just about every commenter here deserves a giant WHOOOSH stamped on their forehead.

Apollo Software Pioneer Margaret Hamilton Dies at 90

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
"Margaret Hamilton, the groundbreaking researcher who helped create the field of software engineering and whose code helped land NASA’s Apollo astronauts on the moon to win the 20th century space race, has died,” writes longtime Slashdot reader Veeru. “She was 90.” MIT News reports:
A computing pioneer who authored over 130 publications, Hamilton helped to establish software engineering as a dedicated discipline. She worked at MIT from 1959 until the mid-1970s, after which she became a successful computing entrepreneur and CEO. Her life’s work was recognized with many awards and honors, including the 2016 Presidential Medal of Freedom from President Barack Obama, whose citation noted: “Hamilton defined new forms of software engineering and helped launch an industry that would forever change human history. Her software architecture led to giant leaps for humankind, writing the code that helped America set foot on the moon.”
“To say Margaret Hamilton was a pioneer — to say she was ahead of her time — would be a dramatic understatement. She was a software engineer at a time when that field was in its infancy, and she not only developed advanced code herself but also led a team in using that nascent technology to develop one of the most complex systems humanity had ever achieved,” says Olivier de Weck, the Apollo Program Professor and interim head of the MIT Department Aeronautics and Astronautics.
“The Apollo program still stands as one of our greatest testaments to the power of collaboration, ingenuity, and engineering, and Margaret Hamilton was a fundamental contributor to that program’s success. And for her that was just the beginning! She went on to become an entrepreneur and remained on the cutting edge of systems software throughout an extraordinary career, while acting as an advocate, mentor, and inspiration to millions.”

Re:Erm

By Arnonyrnous Covvard • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

She’s not gonna wake up and walk away. Telsa and OpenAl could be gone tomorrow.

A fantastic engineer

By AmiMoJo • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

Not only did she develop software without the aid of modern debugging tools, on a new architecture that was limited in ways that most modern embedded developers can’t even imagine, she pioneered a lot of the software safety techniques we still use.

Re: Erm

By commodore73 • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread
Clickrage bait for nerds?

Re:Erm

By drinkypoo • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

Telsa and OpenAl could be gone tomorrow.

Stop, I can only get so erect.

That’s engineering

By CustomBuild • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

The story about her daughter crashing the simulator says a lot about how she worked. Hamilton wanted a safeguard against starting a prelaunch program during flight; she was told the astronauts were too well trained to make that mistake. Then Lovell did it on Apollo 8, and her team had to help recover. Anyone who’s been told “the user won’t do that” should recognize that argument. She took the possibility of failure seriously, and the priority handling in her team’s Apollo 11 software meant an overloaded computer could keep doing the work needed for the landing. Imagine watching that happen during the actual descent, knowing the recovery mechanisms your team built were being put to the test. I’m glad she lived long enough to receive so much recognition for that work. Rest in peace.

US Bars Microsoft, Adobe, and Major IT Firms From Green Card Program

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from TechCrunch:
The Trump administration is suspending Microsoft, Adobe, and several other technology companies from a program that helps skilled foreign workers obtain permanent residency in the United States, accusing the companies of fraud. “Our message to Microsoft is: You’re a great American company, but you’ve got to hire great American workers,” U.S. Vice President JD Vance said in a news conference on Thursday, Reuters reported.

The other firms being suspended from the program include Capgemini, Cognizant, HCL, Infosys, Tata, and Wipro. Secretary of Labor Keith Sonderling said the government would not accept any new or pending permanent labor certification applications involving these companies. H-1B visas are designed for highly skilled positions that employers may struggle to fill with qualified U.S. workers. Tech companies are among the largest users of the program, with nearly three-quarters of approved visas going to workers from India, according to The Associated Press.

Vance also said during the news conference that the administration would investigate nine universities, including Harvard, Yale, and Stanford, over allegations they’re abusing a program that allows international students to come to the U.S. and were using the program to undermine wages for American workers.
“We believe in the strength and talent of the American workforce,” a Microsoft spokesperson said in a statement. “That is why the vast majority of Microsoft employees in the United States are Americans. We look forward to providing the Administration with additional information. For example, of the approximately 6,000 H-1B visa applications we submitted in the last fiscal year, 80% percent were to extend or change the status of existing Microsoft employees.”
“These were not to hire new people. The remaining filings for new employees were for individuals already legally in the United States who decided to come work for us, and they equal only 1% of our U.S. workforce. They are not new arrivals to our country.”

Re: Uncalled for

By Midnight_Falcon • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
I agree. I am a “lib” and don’t agree with much the Trump administration does. H1B has been abused for decades. Tech companies use it to hire workers at low rates and then abuse them as they become “indentured servants,” afraid of getting fired in which case they have to beg for new employment and sponsorship to stay in the country. The system has been gamed for years. Want to hire an H1B and get a lawyer? The lawyer will tell you two things: Make a job ad which basically asks for the exact resume of your H1B candidate. Exact versions of VMWare, Python, etc you name it…be precise. Then post it in a print newspaper, not online on any job boards or a place a normal person would look. Voila! No American applicants. If you do interview Americans, all you have to do is say “candidate did not have required skills” with no real justification. No one checks. I once consulted at a bank and they literally had an entire floor of Indians on H1B with one white person in the corner office supervising them. I had plenty of friends that would have been qualified to work those jobs. The H1B system has been terrible for some time and needs dismantling. That said, all this will do is cause these companies to hire people in other countries to stay there and work remotely, for even less money than H1B. There also needs to be restrictions on outsourcing labor that can be done in America by Americans.

Re: Excellent Move

By Tony Isaac • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

I’m not sure I’d call it “fraud” per se. Companies usually comply with the letter of the law, just not the spirit.

Re:Except they don’t + H1Bs make local jobs valuab

By bmajik • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

>OK, you don’t work in software. Good tech companies don’t outsource core development. They hire in house.

I was a software engineer at Microsoft for 22 years.

For all 22 of those years, Microsoft had core developers on every product who were not Microsoft employees.

You may want to look up the “permatemps” lawsuit from the early 00s. Microsoft had so many permanant contractor “non employees” that they were succesfully sued for the practice.

Microsoft has all kinds of legal sub-structures and “at a distance” legal entities for various employment arbitrage reasons. The technical talent of the people is not a determining factor in whether someone is a contractor, vendor, or full time employee.... Or if they are employed at an overseas subsidiary or domestically here in the USA.

And Microsoft plays a LOT of games with hiring/employment laws.

For instance, Microsoft had (has?) a large Vancouver development shop because, as I understand it:
1) its faster to get Chinese/Indian nationals into Canada than it is to get them into the USA
2) Vancouver is just up the road from Redmond, so easy to come down to Redmond for in-person meetings once in a while
3) It’s very fast, legally to get people from Canada to the USA

So It was an open secret that MS would hire foreigners into the Vancouver office and park them there for, IIRC, 1 year, before moving them into the US.

Re:Excellent Move

By bmajik • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

I was a dev lead at Microsoft. I believe I was asked to support immigration fraud.

I had an employee on a VISA. He was in a junior level role.

The immigration attorney asked me to verify that the job requirements for his job were:

- masters degree
- expertise in python
- (a few other things)

He had a masters degree. He had the other things on the list.

Problem was, the job he actually had was an entry level dev job. It was the exact job I got hired in at at the beginning of my career. For the level/job he was at, a 4 year degree is normal. Python (or any other specific language) is not needed.

So i said “no, that’s not right. You don’t need this, or this, or that”

And the immigration attorney was like “OH! My mistake! It sounds like this is more of an entry level position! Well, I guess based on what you’ve told me, we cannot sponsor the Greencard process for this employee at this time”

I had no idea that’s what was going on or what was at stake when I answered the question. My employee wasnt mad at me - he quit MS and transferred to Google - who promised to push through his Greencard process. He said once he got done at Google he looked forward to working for me again at Microsoft some day.

So you tell me what you think was going on.

I think I was supposed to rubberstamp Microsoft immigration fraud, and I accidentally didn’t, because I tried to accurately answer the question I was actually asked.

But look at how the lawyer responded. “Oh, shoot, what a silly mistake - nevermind!”.

So no matter how I responded, he has plausible deniability. And if I had said, “yes, these are the required skills”, nobody would have known otherwise.

I was gutted that I had ruined things for my employee without realizing it. The fact that he wasn’t furious with me surprised me. To him, it was all a transaction. He wanted a Greencard; so he was going to go where he could get it - no hard feelings.

It’s all transactional.

Re:Excellent Move

By bmajik • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

Sure.

That was not the case here.

Microsoft did not require masters degrees for entry level dev jobs.

It’s common for Indian/Chinese folks to _have_ masters degrees, because going to the US for graduate school is a common “first step” in the process to get their feet on US soil - F1 student visas.

The way it typically works for an Indian or Chinese software engineer to get into Microsoft (or any of the majors, I assume)

- get 4 year degree (real or fake) back home
- get accepted to US grad school; get student VISA (F1)
- do grad school
- look for US company that will sponsor/supply an H1-B slot
- get OPT status for STEM (up to 3 yr extension of residence permit w/ industry work authorization)
- start at new company under H1-B status
- start the Greencard process

This is the normal path.

Now, here is what is structurally fraudulent about this.

1) The F1 visa is intended for students who plan to leave when they are done. It is not intended to be the on-ramp into the US labor force.
2) the OPT extension to the F1 VISA is not intended to be a long term resident work permit. They max out at 3 years for software people
3) Greencard sponsorship in this scenario is supposed to be downstream of the assertion that there is no human being already in America willing/able to do the work.

From a company POV
The converion rate from OPT to H1B varies; the # of H1B lottery slots are fixed, and people who run out their OPT clock without securing an H1-B lottery slot are allegedly supposed to go home.

The corps know that. So the OPT period essentially turns out to be a “no risk try out” where the company gets to see who is productive and supplicant.

This continues once someone has an H1B; that person knows that the moment they lose their job, they have n days to find a different H1B slot before they are subject to a removal order.

An H1B friend explained it to me: as long as he’s on H1B, he never says no to working late; he never says no to taking the extra incident case, he never says no.

So he wants a Greencard for safety/security reasons; so he can stop being as much of an indentured servant.

The colleges love this system because F1 students can be charged full price to attend. The companies love this because they get indentured servants with a tryout period. And because they have an infinite supply of young 3rd world labor who is fighting over the scraps of available slots, which causes dramatic wage suppression.

When they find a gem, they can move forward with a fraudulent PERM claim and start the greencard sponsorhsip process.

There may be other things going on here. If you’ve been in the industry long enough, you may have come across the claim that “indians hire indians”, and then if you look back at all the teams you’ve been on, the claim appears to fit the observed data.

(which is not to say that the claim is _true_… just that my experiences don’t refute it)

Emmy Awards Leave Broadcast TV For Prime Video

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Amazon Prime Video will become the exclusive global home of the Emmy Awards under a six-year deal beginning in 2027, the Television Academy announced on Tuesday. The Emmys will stream live for free to viewers in more than 240 countries and territories without requiring a Prime subscription. From the report:
In the release, Prime Video was named as the “permanent home” for the Emmys, in contrast to the rotating agreement in place years prior. The switch ends the traditional “wheel-deal” setup to broadcast the awards, where ABC, CBS, NBC and Fox took turns hosting the Emmys each year. The system has been in place since at least 1994, with the most recent eight-year contract expiring this year.
“Television has never been more global, and the Emmys should be a celebration that the world can share,” Television Academy chair Cris Abrego said in a statement. “Having a dedicated home with Prime Video allows us to build on that legacy with unprecedented global reach and a broader commitment to the Television Academy and our mission throughout the year.”

Oh noes....

By dskoll • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

Oh noes.... I never watched the Emmy Awards on TV, and now I can’t watch it because I don’t have an Amazon account. Whatever shall I do???

To the non-cutters…

By reanjr • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

The Emmy’s have abandoned broadcast television. Why haven’t you?

Re:To the non-cutters…

By Fly Swatter • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
The NHL and MLB abandoned broadcast TV, so I abandoned them. Same with Nascar. The only thing left that I watch live over an antenna is the NFL - when they abandon me in a few years, the antenna will be useless and NFL will be dead to me as well.

Time marches on, things change, but advertising continues to ruin the experience for everything; dropping broadcast TV won’t change that.

Re: Oh noes....

By ArmoredDragon • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

If it’s anything like the Oscars, the whole thing is determined by whoever pays the highest bribe to promote their crap. I don’t get why people get excited over the world’s longest, most boring advertisement.

And, as always…

By MachineShedFred • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

As always, nothing of value was lost.

Unless you are in the television business, or 60+ years old, who the hell is watching these televised self-congratulatory industry-wide group masturbation events anyway?

Female AI Agents ‘Paid’ Less Than Males, Study Finds

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Ancient Slashdot reader williamyf writes:
If you thought the gender pay gap was not real, and that there were no biases in the workplace, think again: A recent study from the University of Limerick found that, in a VR office setting, AI agents — not even humanoid robots — that presented themselves as “male” were paid more per task and perceived as more “human-like” than their “female” counterparts, even though both were using the same underlying technology (LLM model, agent, guardrail, and harness). The pay gap was approximately 10%. The study was conducted with 189 people. Small sample, but still, food for thought.

Sounds reasonable

By smooth wombat • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

After all, women go for more decidely female-related professions such as female doctor, female surgeon, female attorney, or female director.

Of course the AI versions would get paid less.

Re:you cant be serious.

By beelsebob • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Not quite, no. The study has put out a paper that spells out what they did, that’s their “proof of bona fides” as you put it. Now if you want to tear it down, you need to make a reasoned and rational argument about something in that paper, not just shout on the internet.

Re:Probably due to methodical errors

By phantomfive • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread
Did you see the pictures of the AIs in the study?

What’s with that lighting? They didn’t adjust for the fact that the woman looks slightly more like a serial killer, with a wrinkled skirt pulled up to her ribcage. I haven’t seen graphics that bad since Metaverse. The study noticed it, but didn’t adjust for it. Relevant quote:

“Johanna was perceived as less human-like than Johan”

Because the graphics were terrible.

Re: Who is paying AI?

By drinkypoo • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

And then what, she withholds hex?

I read methods… this is why.

By sinij • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

Johan and Johanna To ensure high visual fidelity and anatomical realism, appearances were based on standard human models from Reallusion. These models were chosen for their neutral and highly similar appearances, aiming to isolate gender presentation as the primary visual difference between the two assistant representations.

In Figure 3 you can see the resulting bots. Dude looks almost normal, but female-presenting assistant is seriously into uncanny valley. This alone fully explains the observed result.

Chrome 155 Ships Decoding Support For JPEG XL

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Google has released Chrome 155 with support for decoding JPEG XL images, a format that offers 30-50% better compression than JPEG along with lossless compression, JPEG transcoding, HDR, animation, and progressive decoding. From a blog post:
We expect that JPEG XL is most helpful for high-fidelity or lossless compression, especially of photographic images or in cases in which fine-grained progressive decoding is preferred. In this post, we share why we brought JPEG XL to Chrome, how we used Rust to ensure memory safety first, the extensive performance work that makes it fast, and what the journey tells us about developer feedback and the web standards ecosystem.

[…] With JPEG XL officially landing in Chrome, the web becomes faster, richer, and safer. We encourage developers, content creators, and platform owners to start using .jxl images and animations in their pipelines. Try it out, file bugs, and help us continue building a faster and safer web for everyone.

Re:Too bad…

By drinkypoo • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

You also don’t want to see security updates? It’s simply not safe to use an old browser.

Re:Safer?

By Rei • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

Look, I use HEIC, but JPEG-XL is just better.

* Royalty-free
* Lossless transcoding of legacy JPEGs to immediately reduce their sizes by ~20% (fast enough that you can have webservers do it in realtime)
* Better fine detail / high frequency data representation for the same bitrate. HEIC was designed for video and simply is not as good at stills.
* Faster decoding
* MUCH faster compression
* True progressive decoding - and not old-school blocky progressive decoding, but using a smart algorithm that restores coarse detail (particularly focusing on parts of the image that the eyes immediately focus on) first, then progressively adding in finer detail that the eyes take more time to notice later.
* Vastly better lossless compression
* Better colour depth and native HDR (up to 32 bit per channel)
* Up to 1B x 1B pixel images (again, useful for scientific and engineering applications), with efficient loading (don’t have to load and decode the whole 1B x 1B image at full resolution to view it)
* Arbitrary colour spaces - you can even use it for scientific hyperspectral imaging. You can include e.g. alpha, depth maps, thermal data, selection masks, etc etc.

It’s just a better format for stills. It’s annoying that it’s taken this long to get support to take off (because it takes ages for most people to update their browsers), but I’m really glad that it’s starting to.

Re:Safer?

By thegarbz • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

No one said that. No one said it’s “safe”. They said it’s “safer”. Memory-safety makes the whole codebase safer than not having memory safety.

Now go look up what a “comparative adjective” is so you don’t say something stupid again in the future.

Re:Why did they remove it in the first place?

By thegarbz • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

Unused, and no use case for it, no pathway predicting it would become popular, and no reason to develop it further.
That changed when the PDF/A decided to adopt JPEGXL officially. Now PDF readers need to implement JPEGXL and both Chrome and Firefox include PDF readers in the browser. Their hand was forced.

Re:Safer?

By Rei • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

Slashdot doesn’t have table support, so it’s hard to do side-by-side well, but:

JPEG XL advantages:

Licensing:

JPEG XL: Fully royalty-free (Open source / Apache 2.0)
HEIC: Proprietary patent minefield (MPEG LA, Advance, Velos; royalties apply)

Legacy JPEG Migration:

JPEG XL: Lossless, reversible bitstream transcoding (~20% smaller); fast enough for real-time web servers
HEIC: Lossy re-encode only (generational quality loss; cannot reconstruct original JPEG)

Fine Detail & Textures

JPEG XL: Retains sharp text, fine lines, subtle textures, and film grain
HEIC: Video-derived coding (HEVC / X.265). Tends to smooth out high frequences and smudge grain.

Software Encoding Speed

JPEG XL: Extremely fast; highly parallelized SIMD architecture
HEIC: Exceptionally slow and computationally expensive in software

Software Decoding Speed

JPEG XL: Fast, lightweight multi-threaded CPU decoding
HEIC: Heavy CPU overhead (without using hardware acceleration)

Progressive Rendering:

JPEG XL: True progressive decode; smart saliency algorithm to focus bandwidth on critical details first.
HEIC: None; full file must be received and decoded before display

Lossless Compression
JPEG XL: Dedicated modular mode; vastly outperforms PNG and WebP
HEIC: Ill-suited; you basically have to try to do lossless compression with an inherently-lossy format

Bit Depth & HDR

JPEG XL: Native HDR; up to 32-bit floating point per channel
HEIC: Typically capped at 10-bit or 12-bit integer

Max Dimensions & Scaling

JPEG XL: Up to 1B x 1B; efficient viewport/crop loading without full decoding
HEIC: v5.2, 4096x2160; v6.2: 8192x4320; a tiling hack allows up to 16384 x 16384

Channels & Color Spaces:

JPEG XL: Arbitrary color spaces (hyperspectral); unlimited extra channels (alpha, depth, thermal, masks, CMYK, etc)
HEIC: Rigid container; limited auxiliary channels and standard video color spaces

HEIC advantages:

Rollout / acceleration:

JPEG XL: no dedicated hardware acceleration (thankfully, it’s not as important because it’s so much more efficient). Software adoption still rolling out.
HEIC: Hardware silicon (ASICs). Default capture format on modern iOS/Android; native capture in Sony, Canon, and Nikon cameras

Video:

JPEG XL: Supports animations (GIF/APNG replacement), with some optimizations** (it’s not just a series of stills), but lacks the full set of optimizations that a proper video codec has.
HEIC: Container naively pairs full HEVC video tracks and audio with video.

** - JPEG XL can store up to 4 reference frames in a buffer, with multiple blending modes from the references (add, replace, multiply, etc); has subframe bounding boxes (“dirty rectangles”) for when only part of a frame changes; invisible frames; modular deltas (differences between frames); etc. However, it lacks motion vectors (e.g. detecting a feature drifting across a scene and simply having to encode “move it” (followed by any needed deltas). So it’s great for “GIFs”, but if you wanted to encode a full movie, it’d be significantly larger than e.g. HEVC.

OpenAI Unleashes Hundreds More Math Results Upon a Field Already In Shock

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
OpenAI says an unreleased internal model has produced 372 results that either resolve or make substantial progress on open problems in mathematics and theoretical computer science. The company says almost all were generated by a single AI agent from a single prompt. “This would be a striking difference from OpenAI’s earlier blockbuster solution to the Navier-Stokes problem, which was produced through the collective efforts of a 10,000-strong agentic swarm that cost millions of dollars in computing power,” reports Scientific American. From the report:
OpenAI revealed the results in a GitHub repository at 6 P.M. EDT. The deluge will take mathematicians months to parse through and understand — including to determine whether the proofs contain novel and important ideas or are mostly mash-ups of existing techniques. But many of the results have already been verified in Lean — a programming language that validates a proof’s logic — and are therefore all but certain to be correct.

Among the results claimed are a solution to the four-dimensional Kakeya conjecture, improvements on some of the world’s most important computer algorithms and actual progress toward math’s scariest problem, the Riemann hypothesis.

Re: mostly mash-ups of existing techniques

By LindleyF • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread
I have proof. But it is too large to fit in this buffer.

A few comments on the problems

By JoshuaZ • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

Mathematician here specializing in number theory with a side-order of graph theory. I’ve only had time to start looking at two of them. First, is the Hadwiger-Nelson/chromatic number of the plane https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hadwiger%E2%80%93Nelson_problem proof. As far as I’m aware (and I could be wrong) the technique it uses here is not in the literature, so this is a genuine construction of a new technique. Second is the Erdos Egyptian fraction bound, and for that one it looks like the techniques are about what I’d expect, but I’m definitely still digesting both of these.

For the quasi-Riemann Hypothesis the striking thing is almost the opposite direction. It looks like the AI used standard complex analytic techniques to get the result. But many mathematicians have often thought for years that those techniques would not likely be strong enough to get this sort of result.

I know less about the Unique Games Conjecture https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unique_games_conjecture but having talked with some of the people there it looks like it took a somewhat standard set of ideas and then combined them with multiple just weird stuff and sort of took a hard left turn at one point for no clear reason and ended up at the result.

It is also worth noting that while many of these have Lean code confirming their correctness (quasi-RH for example) others do not. The three I mentioned above have all also been looked at at this point by human mathematicians who have not found issues; that’s likely true for others, but those three I’m aware at least of people doing so. Not all the claims have Lean code though; a bit under half. One of the non-formalized problems also has been withdrawn due to what essentially amounts to a sign error https://github.com/openai/math/blob/main/preprints/Algebraicity-of-Weil-classes-on-split-abelian-eightfolds-September-18-2026/paper.pdf. It is likely others will be withdrawn also by the end, but I’d be surprised if more than 10 are. And even if everything single one without Lean code turned out to be wrong (which seems very unlikely), this would still be an amazing set of math. I commented elsewhere that if a human mathematician had made the quasi-RH result they’d be likely a shoe-in for the Fields Medal, and another mathematician replied saying “delete likely.”

Now a more editorial comment: There are legitimate concerns about what this is doing to mathematics. This sort of thing is very cool. But it also is part of a trend that may make it much harder to train young mathematicians or get them to exist at all. If the AIs are limited in how genuinely novel their ideas can be, then we may end up in a situation where we get a massive burst in math over the next few years, and then math stalls out because we don’t have enough good really high caliber mathematicians (Not the mathematicians like me, but people like Serre, Tao, Scholze, Clausen,etc.) to come up with deeply new ideas that the AIs can build on.

Re:mostly mash-ups of existing techniques

By StormReaver • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

It doesn’t really matter if it makes a useful contribution to the field.

To which field? Math? Not even close. Data theft? absolutely.

If the mathematicians ever used ChatGPT to talk about math, then that is the source of the results. LLMs, by definition, cannot usefully contribute to anything that requires more than rearranging existing data. Rearranging existing data is their only function.

Re:A few comments on the problems

By BranMan • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

THIS is why we have Slashdot. Thanks for looking into this JoshuaZ! Let us know what you find out. We’ll stay tuned.

Re:mostly mash-ups of existing techniques

By JoshuaZ • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

If the mathematicians ever used ChatGPT to talk about math, then that is the source of the results. LLMs, by definition, cannot usefully contribute to anything that requires more than rearranging existing data. Rearranging existing data is their only function.

This is really not accurate. There’s Fields Medal level work here with quasi-RH for example. And for Hadwiger-Nelson it took an approach that doesn’t seem to be in in the literature. These things really are doing novel math. I’ve personally seen this is in a bunch of situations. Here’s a personal example, much smaller than anything like these problems. I have a recent preprint with a student here https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.36068 (about 90% of this was done by her. She’s very good.) But part of this came from when I ran a version of Proposition 13 in that paper through Claude just to clean up the draft of that bit before I sent it to her. Claude informed me (essentially unprompted) that the argument had a whole in it (in addition to pointing out grammar errors, unbalanced parentheses and some other embarrassing minor mistakes). I then fixed the hole, and gave it back to Claude. Claude thought for a few minutes, and then informed me that I had *not* fixed the hole, and the reason was that my version of the proposition was missing an entire infinite family which it constructed. The literature on this problem is small, and I’m very familiar with it. The family it produced is straightforward (see Prop 8), but definitely was not in the existing literature. So yes, these systems really can do novel math, and can even do so in an essentially minimally prompted fashion, in this case, explaining to the meat mathematician why his proof is wrong. My student and I then generalized Claude’s family to Theorem 9 in that paper, but the AI definitely had an impact.

At some level this was actually not a good thing. I’m trying to encourage students to *not* rely on the AI for research so they develop basic research skills. So if the AI had not volunteered the family I wouldn’t have had to tell her that the AI had discovered it, but honestly required noting it. So I had a conflict between intellectual honesty and being a good role model.

Campus Censorship Wars, 25 Years After a Slashdot Q&A

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot
Slashdot reader carlk22 writes:
In February 2001, Slashdot readers asked Carl Kadie about censorship and privacy at colleges, and he answered. Now Kadie, who founded the Computers and Academic Freedom project at EFF in 1991, has written its history. In Part 1, Ohio State kicks a student off its network, then out of school, after a prank routes his “fuck you” into rec.aquaria, and a supercomputing center fires a student over an email from saddam@iraq.bunker.gov. In Part 2, Nebraska bans the project’s own newsletter, the FBI asks a conference attendee to show them his leg, and Playboy calls. The original archive is on GitHub.

Re: State is probably best stated by the comics

By maladroit • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

This racist is a Republican, and the likely winner of a statewide office in Texas:
https://www.texastribune.org/2…

He has been endorsed by multiple Republicans, including the Texas governor.
https://www.texastribune.org/2…

Re:State is probably best stated by the comics

By drinkypoo • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread

Hamas has repeatedly declared its intent to exterminate all the Jews. That’s genocide.

Netanyahu is currently doing what every expert says is a genocide in Gaza. Hamas was founded in response to a massacre in a mosque done by a Jewish “settler” assault-colonialist.

Hamas, who just a couple of years ago, attacked Israel to rape and slaughter thousands of people. After decades of the same.

What is the death toll on each side?
Why are Jews protesting for the right to rape Palestinian hostages?

Re:State is probably best stated by the comics

By jacks smirking reven • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

None of that happens in a vacuum though, the reason DACA was done via EO was that Republicans refused to pass the DREAM Act which was a bi-partisan bill kicked around since 2001 but Republicans would filibuster it at every oppurtunity.

- Same with the McCain Kennedy bill, bipartisan legislation never got a vote in the Senate
- Same with another bill in 2007, never made it out of the Senate
- Same with the Gang of 8 Bill which did et over 60 votes in the Senate, bipartisan! Then John Boehner , Republican Speaker, let it die on the vine, never got a vote.
- Then we have the Lankford bill, a bipartisan yet very conservative bill that Biden signaled he would sign. Was going to be actual law until Trump told Republicans he needed the issue to campaign on (Ted Cruz admitted to this explicitly) so they let it die.

So at every opportunity to pass actual immigration reform, something we have needed for like 50+ years, the last major legislation being from the Reagan era (where he granted amnesty!) Republicans stand in the way, almost like they don’t really care about the issue, I mean, if immigration is this huge crisis why no legislation? Someone answer that question.

What is missing from the entire conversation right now is Trump is governing pretty much EXACTLY like Bush, Obama, AND Biden did.

Absolutely fucking not, the lawlessness, the destruction of norms, the bending of the alw, the craven grifting, the brutally divisive rhetoric, it’s incredibly different and any equivocation is really just copium or ignorance, usually the former, it’s a self soothing permission structure, “we can be fucking unhinged because i feel personally slighted”

Even the bitter clingers thing is just nonsense, even the smallest bit of context destroys that whole talking point, there’s a reason it’s always brought up and never quoted

But the truth is, is that, our challenge is to get people persuaded that we can make progress when there’s not evidence of that in their daily lives. You go into some of these small towns in Pennsylvania, and like a lot of small towns in the Midwest, the jobs have been gone now for 25 years and nothing’s replaced them. And they fell through the Clinton administration, and the Bush administration, and each successive administration has said that somehow these communities are gonna regenerate and they have not. So it’s not surprising then that they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.

Um, now these are in some communities, you know. I think what you’ll find is, is that people of every background — there are gonna be a mix of people, you can go in the toughest neighborhoods, you know working-class lunch-pail folks, you’ll find Obama enthusiasts. And you can go into places where you think I’d be very strong and people will just be skeptical. The important thing is that you show up and you’re doing what you’re doing.

What exactly is so offensive about that statement? Who are the snowflakes here?

Re: State is probably best stated by the comics

By drinkypoo • • Score: 4, Informative • Thread

This is stupid racist dickhead bullshit because ICE has detained at least 500 citizens so far, and every person who was “deported” to a country they didn’t come from was trafficked by ICE. Fuck your support for racism in pursuit of your support of a child rapist traitor. It also makes you a traitor.

Re:State is probably best stated by the comics

By bmajik • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Control of other people’s speech is always about asserting power.

It’s never actually about “reducing harm”; it’s about asserting power.

Talking about it in “harm” terms is a clever hack: … because most humans are sensitive to harm/harm reduction along their moral reasoning (see: Jonathan Haidt)

But “Never hurt my feelings” is an impossible bar, and it doesn’t scale across a civilization. It cannot be a basis for law.

The attempt to abuse the “harm receptors” of political enemies is contributing to the mutual dehumanization across faction lines.