Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. How AI Assistants Are Moving the Security Goalposts
  2. Bluesky CEO Jay Graber Is Stepping Down
  3. Qualcomm’s New Arduino Ventuno Q Is an AI-Focused Computer Designed For Robotics
  4. Anthropic Sues the Pentagon After Being Labeled a Threat To National Security
  5. ‘If Lockheed Martin Made a Game Boy, Would You Buy One?’
  6. AI Allows Hackers To Identify Anonymous Social Media Accounts, Study Finds
  7. Swiss Vote Places Right To Use Cash In Country’s Constitution
  8. US Military Tested Device That May Be Tied To Havana Syndrome On Rats, Sheep
  9. New SETI Study: Why We Might Have Been Missing Alien Signals
  10. EFF, Ubuntu and Other Distros Discuss How to Respond to Age-Verification Laws
  11. Scientists Just Doubled Our Catalog of Black Hole and Neutron Star Collisions
  12. Judges Find AI Doesn’t Have Human Intelligence in Two New Court Cases
  13. Could Home-Building Robots Help Fix the Housing Crisis?
  14. A Security Researcher Went ‘Undercover’ on Moltbook - and Found Security Risks
  15. Robotic Surgery Performed Remotely on Patient 1,500 Miles Away

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

How AI Assistants Are Moving the Security Goalposts

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from KrebsOnSecurity:
AI-based assistants or “agents” — autonomous programs that have access to the user’s computer, files, online services and can automate virtually any task — are growing in popularity with developers and IT workers. But as so many eyebrow-raising headlines over the past few weeks have shown, these powerful and assertive new tools are rapidly shifting the security priorities for organizations, while blurring the lines between data and code, trusted co-worker and insider threat, ninja hacker and novice code jockey.

The new hotness in AI-based assistants — OpenClaw (formerly known as ClawdBot and Moltbot) — has seen rapid adoption since its release in November 2025. OpenClaw is an open-source autonomous AI agent designed to run locally on your computer and proactively take actions on your behalf without needing to be prompted. If that sounds like a risky proposition or a dare, consider that OpenClaw is most useful when it has complete access to your entire digital life, where it can then manage your inbox and calendar, execute programs and tools, browse the Internet for information, and integrate with chat apps like Discord, Signal, Teams or WhatsApp.

Other more established AI assistants like Anthropic’s Claude and Microsoft’s Copilot also can do these things, but OpenClaw isn’t just a passive digital butler waiting for commands. Rather, it’s designed to take the initiative on your behalf based on what it knows about your life and its understanding of what you want done. “The testimonials are remarkable,” the AI security firm Snyk observed. “Developers building websites from their phones while putting babies to sleep; users running entire companies through a lobster-themed AI; engineers who’ve set up autonomous code loops that fix tests, capture errors through webhooks, and open pull requests, all while they’re away from their desks.” You can probably already see how this experimental technology could go sideways in a hurry. […]
Last month, Meta AI safety director Summer Yue said OpenClaw unexpectedly started mass-deleting messages in her email inbox, despite instructions to confirm those actions first. She wrote: “Nothing humbles you like telling your OpenClaw ‘confirm before acting’ and watching it speedrun deleting your inbox. I couldn’t stop it from my phone. I had to RUN to my Mac mini like I was defusing a bomb.”

Krebs also noted the many misconfigured OpenClaw installations users had set up, leaving their administrative dashboards publicly accessible online. According to pentester Jamieson O’Reilly, “a cursory search revealed hundreds of such servers exposed online.” When those exposed interfaces are accessed, attackers can retrieve the agent’s configuration and sensitive credentials. O’Reilly warned attackers could access “every credential the agent uses — from API keys and bot tokens to OAuth secrets and signing keys.”

“You can pull the full conversation history across every integrated platform, meaning months of private messages and file attachments, everything the agent has seen,” O’Reilly added. And because you control the agent’s perception layer, you can manipulate what the human sees. Filter out certain messages. Modify responses before they’re displayed.”

Bluesky CEO Jay Graber Is Stepping Down

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Bluesky CEO Jay Graber is stepping down after overseeing the platform’s growth from a Twitter research project into a 40-million-user alternative to X. “As Bluesky matures, the company needs a seasoned operator focused on scaling and execution, while I return to what I do best: building new things,” Graber wrote in a statement.

She will be transitioning to a new Chief Innovation Officer role while Venture capitalist Toni Schneider will serve as interim CEO until the board searches for a permanent replacement. Wired reports:
Graber joined Bluesky in 2019, when it was a research project within Twitter focused on developing a decentralized framework for the social web. She became the company’s first chief executive officer in 2021, when it spun out into an independent entity. She oversaw the platform’s remarkable rise and the growing pains it experienced as it transformed from a quirky Twitter offshoot to a full-fledged alternative to X. Schneider tells WIRED that he intends to help Bluesky “become not just the best open social app, but the foundation for a whole new generation of user-owned networks.”

Schneider, who will continue working as a partner at the venture capital firm True Ventures while at Bluesky, was previously CEO of the Wordpress parent company, Automattic, from 2006 to 2014. He also served as its CEO again in 2024 while top executive Matt Mullenweg went on a sabbatical. During that time, Schneider met Graber and became an adviser to Bluesky’s leadership. In a blog post announcing his new role, Schneider said he plans to emphasize scaling, describing his job as “to help set up Bluesky’s next phase of growth.”

This isn’t the end for Graber and Bluesky. She will transition to become the company’s chief innovation officer, a role focused on Bluesky’s technology stack rather than its business operations. The position was created for her. Graber, who began her career as a software engineer, has always sounded the most enthusiastic when discussing Bluesky’s technology rather than its revenue streams. Bluesky’s board of directors will appoint the next permanent CEO. The members include Jabber founder Jeremie Miller, crypto-focused VC Kinjal Shah, TechDirt founder Mike Masnick, and Graber. (Twitter founder Jack Dorsey was originally part of the board but quit in 2024.) This means Graber will have input on her successor. The talent search is still in early stages.

No need to worry

By HnT • Score: 3 Thread

No need to worry, I dont think this ideologically very limited monoculture platform will last much longer..

Then put your money where your mouth is

By karmawarrior • Score: 3 Thread

> Schneider tells WIRED that he intends to help Bluesky “become not just the best open social app, but the foundation for a whole new generation of user-owned networks.”

Bluesky will remain a normal monolithic network as long as its owned and controlled by one group. If they want to prove they intend to do what they’re claiming they want to do, they need to decentralize, and split the company into multiple (at least 3) social network portals with their own critical infrastructure.

For now, there’s only one decentralized network, and it’s not BS.

Qualcomm’s New Arduino Ventuno Q Is an AI-Focused Computer Designed For Robotics

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Qualcomm and Arduino have unveiled the Arduino Ventuno Q, a new AI-focused single-board computer built for robotics and edge systems. Engadget reports:
Called the Arduino Ventuno Q, it uses Qualcomm’s Dragonwing IQ8 processor along with a dedicated STM32H5 low-latency microcontroller (MCU). “Ventuno Q is engineered specifically for systems that move, manipulate and respond to the physical world with precision and reliability,” the company wrote on the product page. The Ventuno Q is more sophisticated (and expensive) than Arduinio’s usual AIO boards, thanks to the Dragonwing IQ8 processor that includes an 8-core ARM Cortex CPU, Adreno Arm Cortex A623 GPU and Hexagon Tensor NPU that can hit up ot 40 TOPs. It also comes with 16GB of LPDDR5 RAM, along with 64GB of eMMC storage and an M.2 NVME Gen.4 slot to expand that. Other features include Wi-Fi 6, Bluetooth 5.3, 2.5Gbps ethernet and USB camera support.

The Ventuno Q includes Arudino App Lab, with pre-trained AI models including LLMs, VLMs, ASR, gesture recognition, pose estimation and object tracking, all running offline. It’s designed for AI systems that run entirely offline like smart kiosks, healthcare assistants and traffic flow analysis, along with Edge AI vision and sensing systems. It also supports a full robotics stack including vision processing combined with deterministic motor control for precise vision and manipulation. It’s also ideal for education and research in areas like computer vision, generative AI and prototyping at the edge, according to Arduino.
Further reading: Up Next for Arduino After Qualcomm Acquisition: High-Performance Computing

Don’t

By hwstar • Score: 3 Thread

Qualcomm is known for their contracts written on flypaper. They have a whole department which does lawyerly things (QTL).

Stay Away

Pricing

By yo303 • Score: 3 Thread

Pricing was conveniently left out of the summary. It should be less than $300 in 2Q26.

Anthropic Sues the Pentagon After Being Labeled a Threat To National Security

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Anthropic is suing the Department of Defense after the Trump administration labeled the company a “supply chain risk” and canceled its government contracts when Anthropic refused to allow its AI model Claude to be used for domestic surveillance or autonomous weapons. Fortune reports:
The lawsuit, filed Monday in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, calls the administration’s actions “unprecedented and unlawful” and claims they threaten to harm “Anthropic irreparably.” The complaint claims that government contracts are already being canceled and that private contracts are also in doubt, putting “hundreds of millions of dollars” at near-term risk.

An Anthropic spokesperson told Fortune: “Seeking judicial review does not change our longstanding commitment to harnessing AI to protect our national security, but this is a necessary step to protect our business, our customers, and our partners.” “We will continue to pursue every path toward resolution, including dialogue with the government,” they added.

2 different legal actions

By david.emery • Score: 4, Informative Thread

One is in Northern District of California: https://www.courtlistener.com/… This is probably the main event. There’s an initial complaint and then a request for Temporary Restraining Order.

The other action is in the DC Circuit: https://www.courtlistener.com/… IANAL, but I think it’s here because of requirements around disputes that could go to the Court of Claims but that have Constitutional or other non-contractual aspects vector directly to the DC Circuit.

It’s always worth finding the docket and reading the complaint, the response, the various legal briefs (and amici briefs) and then the decision. Don’t depend on others to summarize this for you, I often find a lot of nuance in there that the brief news summaries miss. (I also find A LOT of bullshit arguments, and legal mumbo-jumbo, but the more of these you read, the easier it gets.)

p.s. It’s not officially the Department of War until CONGRESS changes the name.

Re:Isn’t it called…?

By EvilSS • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
It’s officially still The Department of Defense until Congress decides otherwise. “Department of War” is more like it’s preferred pronouns.

Re:Well… They kind of are.

By maladroit • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

A ‘supply chain risk’ is something that should not be used by a DoD contractor or supplier because it might be subverted by an adversary. Think Huawei routers.

That’s not the same thing as something the Pentagon thinks they need. That’s what the Defense Production Act is supposed to cover.

The DoD is simultaneously saying that they need Anthropic and that it’s too dangerous to use. It’s absolute bullshit.

Re:Anthropic played this horribly

By 93 Escort Wagon • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Anthropic attempted to spin this as being against mass surveillance and autonomous weapons but apparently they also tried to prevent their AI from being used for all kinds of use cases for the Department of War over months of negotiations. Not just cases of autonomous weapons, which are the future of war, but they also wanted to prevent their model from being used even in planning stages for any strikes and any data collection.

It would be helpful if you could provide some citations documenting that.

Re:Well… They kind of are.

By Talon0ne • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

The DoD is simultaneously saying that they need Anthropic and that it’s too dangerous to use.

I see it as “We recognize Anthropic makes the best product and we want to use it. But if they can turn it off on us at their choice then it is too dangerous for us to use.” Subtle difference but it’s a reasonable take.

‘If Lockheed Martin Made a Game Boy, Would You Buy One?’

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
“If Lockheed Martin made a Game Boy, would you buy one?” That was the [rhetorical] question The Verge’s Sean Hollister asked when he reviewed ModRetro’s Game Boy-style handheld device back in 2024. He said it “might be the best version of the Game Boy ever made,” though the connection to Palmer Luckey and his defense tech startup Anduril left him conflicted. “I don’t remember my childhood nostalgia coming with a side of possible guilt and fear about putting money into the pocket of a weapons contractor,” he wrote. “Feels weird!”

Those conflicted feelings have lingered ever since. TechCrunch recently cited Hollister’s review while reporting that ModRetro is now seeking funding at a $1 billion valuation. The company is said to have additional retro-inspired hardware in development, including one designed to replicate the Nintendo 64. As for Anduril? It’s reportedly in talks to raise a new funding round that would value the company at around $60 billion.

What’s the conflict?

By Valgrus Thunderaxe • Score: 3 Thread
I don’t see any issue here with Palmer Lucky making a gaming device.

Childhood nostalgia guilt?

By thegarbz • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

You were a kid, you wouldn’t have given an iota of a shit if Nintendo’s CEO ate babies.

If Porsche or VW ever made tanks, would you buy th

By HnT • Score: 3 Thread

If Porsche and VW ever made tanks, would you buy their cars? What about Bayer, certain chemicals, and buying their Aspirin?

What radical-postmodernist guilt-by-association BS is this??!!! Are weapons manufacturer now by definition super duper evil and society somehow has to shun them altho by law they are legal..? WTF is this vigilante pseudo-justice activism BS???

The-new-left and radical-postmodernism were a mistake.

AI Allows Hackers To Identify Anonymous Social Media Accounts, Study Finds

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from the Guardian:
AI has made it vastly easier for malicious hackers to identify anonymous social media accounts, a new study has warned. In most test scenarios, large language models (LLMs) — the technology behind platforms such as ChatGPT — successfully matched anonymous online users with their actual identities on other platforms, based on the information they posted. The AI researchers Simon Lermen and Daniel Paleka said LLMs make it cost effective to perform sophisticated privacy attacks, forcing a “fundamental reassessment of what can be considered private online”.

In their experiment, the researchers fed anonymous accounts into an AI, and got it to scrape all the information it could. They gave a hypothetical example of a user talking about struggling at school, and walking their dog Biscuit through a “Dolores park.” In that hypothetical case, the AI then searched elsewhere for those details and matched @anon_user42 to the known identity with a high degree of confidence. While this example was fictional, the paper’s authors highlighted scenarios in which governments use AI to surveil dissidents and activists posting anonymously, or hackers are able to launch “highly personalized” scams.

a day in the park

By bugs2squash • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
I was walking my dog, Felicity, through Hegsketh park yesterday when I came across an oak tree, which, as you know, is an all consuming personal interest of mine

It would be a hell of a lot more helpful..

By geekmux • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

..if AI helped identify the AI slop-infested dogshit acting as “anonymous” to enrage a partisan populous.

Let’s see how good it is at telling on itself. For clickbait and spams sake.

Anonymous accounts are easy to identify

By greytree • Score: 3 Thread
Anonymous accounts are easy to identify - they don’t have a real name on them.

Oh, you meant the accounts were de-anonymized and the users identified ?

Then write that.

I learned this lesson 27 years ago

By Tablizer • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

as a troll used search engines to cross-reference various clues I had inadvertently left behind on the internet to dox me. It only required determination, not rocket science. Bots have all the time in the world to clue-hop.

Swiss Vote Places Right To Use Cash In Country’s Constitution

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Swiss voters overwhelmingly approved a constitutional amendment guaranteeing the right to use physical cash. “The vote means Switzerland will join the likes of Hungary, Slovakia and Slovenia, which have already written the right to cold, hard cash in their constitutions,” reports Politico. From the report:
Official results revealed that 73.4 percent of voters backed the legal amendment, which the government proposed as a counter to a similar initiative by a group called the Swiss Freedom Movement. The Swiss Freedom Movement triggered the national referendum after its initiative to protect cash collected more than 100,000 signatures, triggering a national referendum. Its initiative secured only 46 percent of the final vote after the government said some of the group’s proposed amendments went too far.

good

By hjf • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

in a world of “age verification laws” and governments pushing for “cashless”, and precedents like Canada freezing protesters bank accounts, yes.

governments are turning ultra fascist everywhere. doesn’t matter if they say they’re left wing progressive. they’re after your internet anonymity and want you to keep your money in banks, mostly to avoid tax evasion.

(cue in europeans saying they’re not fascist and i’m a dumb american etc and canadians justifying the bank account freezing because it was aligned with the party’s interest)

Just imagine what could happen in USA

By bussdriver • Score: 3 Thread

If Trump could stop his enemies from being able to spend their money? He hasn’t figured out he could do that already… outside of international sanctions he already places on people he doesn’t like just doing their jobs. (ICC judges)

FYI: in the USA, it’s the law that currency has to be acceptable payment (since the great depression.) This law is often ignored these days and it doesn’t specify physical money allowing legalese to render it almost pointless.

The state dept under Hillary blocked wikileaks without any laws; simply asking credit cards to block it, as a favor. I bet more of the swiss know of such things than Americans… who have been proven their stupidity. Hey, I’m one but I’m in the minority; one of the smart Americans. Many of us still have shame and it should be used heavily; we’re not smart enough for facts and reason… again, this is proven.

Re:Just imagine what could happen in USA

By Chris Mattern • Score: 4, Informative Thread

It is permissible to make the form of payment a condition of sale. Once the sale is made, the debt by law can be settled in cash—unless it was part of the terms of sale that payment must be by some other means. You’ll only pay in cash? Then I won’t sell to you. This is allowed.

Cash is King

By TwistedGreen • Score: 3 Thread

This is good to hear. It baffles me when people loudly proclaim things like “I don’t remember the last time I’ve used cash,” or claim to never carry cash, as if it were a flex. Who are you trying to impress, your credit card company?

It just reminds me of the old Rejected cartoon by Don Hertzfeldt, holding up a sign proclaiming: “I’m a consumer whore!”

It’s actually kind of sad that you effectively have to pay with a credit card because if you don’t get your 4% cash back, this effectively means you’re paying a premium for using cash. Your cash back is coming from all the “suckers” who do pay with cash, and these fees just keep increasing.

US Military Tested Device That May Be Tied To Havana Syndrome On Rats, Sheep

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from CBS News:
Tonight, we have details of a classified U.S. intelligence mission that has obtained a previously unknown weapon that may finally unlock a mystery. Since at least 2016, U.S. diplomats, spies and military officers have suffered crippling brain injuries. They’ve told of being hit by an overwhelming force, damaging their vision, hearing, sense of balance and cognition. but the government has doubted their stories. They’ve been called delusional. Well now, 60 Minutes has learned that a weapon that can inflict these injuries was obtained overseas and secretly tested on animals on a U.S. military base. We’ve investigated this mystery for nine years. This is our fourth story called, “Targeting Americans.” Despite official government doubt, we never stopped reporting because of the haunting stories we heard […].
60 Minutes interviewed Dr. David Relman, a scientific expert and professor from Stanford University who was tasked by the government to lead two investigations into the Havana Syndrome cases. What he and his panel of doctors, physicists, engineers and others found was that “the most plausible explanation for a subset of these cases was a form of radiofrequency or microwave energy,” the report says.

According to confidential sources cited in the report, undercover Homeland Security agents bought a miniaturized microwave weapon from a Russian criminal network in 2024 and tested it on animals at a U.S. military lab. The injuries reportedly matched those seen in the human cases. “Our confidential sources tell us the still classified weapon has been tested in a U.S. military lab for more than a year,” says Dr. Relman. “Tests on rats and sheep show injuries consistent with those seen in humans.”

He continues: “Also, as a separate part of the investigation, security camera videos have been collected that show Americans being hit. The videos are classified but they were described to us. In one, a camera in a restaurant in Istanbul captured two FBI agents on vacation sitting at a table with their families. A man with a backpack walks in and suddenly everyone at the table grabs their head as if in pain. Our sources say another video comes from a stairwell in the U.S. embassy in Vienna. The stairs lead to a secure facility. In the video, two people on the stairs suddenly collapse. Those videos and the weapon were among the reasons the Biden administration summoned about half a dozen victims to the White House with about two months left in the president’s term.”

Former intelligence officials and researchers claim elements of the U.S. government downplayed or dismissed the theory for years, possibly to avoid political consequences of accusing a foreign state like Russia of conducting attacks on American personnel.

Magneto

By TwistedGreen • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Henceforth all overseas US military personnel must wear Magneto helmets at all times.

That means

By wakeboarder • Score: 3 Thread

Tin foil hats will be en vogue again.

Hasn’t it already been used?

By 0xG • Score: 3 Thread

Seems to me that I read earlier that it had already been deployed during the attack on Venezuela.

Invulnerable politicians

By algaeman • Score: 3 Thread
Can’t brain damage someone that is already brain damaged (or never had a brain)

Read the wiki

By argStyopa • Score: 3, Interesting Thread

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…

After a fair amount of confusion and some academic arguments, DoD pushed hard to have this taken seriously.

“The Department of Defense (DoD) established the task force partly due to frustration over what DoD officials considered to be a sluggish and lackluster response by the CIA and Department of State.[39] Christopher C. Miller, who was acting defense secretary at the time, said in 2021 that “I knew CIA and Department of State were not taking this shit seriously and we wanted to shame them into it by establishing our task force.”[39] Miller said that he began to consider the reports of mysterious symptoms to be a high priority in December 2020, after he conducted an interview with a person with major combat experience who detailed symptoms.[39]"

As late as 2022, CIA: “The study concluded that it was unlikely that a foreign power was responsible for the AHIs, and that the study had not yet found evidence of involvement by a state actor.”

2023: Five of the seven agencies involved in generating the report concluded “the available intelligence consistently points against the involvement of US adversaries in causing the reported incidents” and that a foreign adversary’s involvement was “very unlikely”. One of the other agencies concluded that foreign involvement was “unlikely”, and the seventh agency declined to make a finding.[127][130][129]

New SETI Study: Why We Might Have Been Missing Alien Signals

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
After decades of searching for extraterrestrial intelligence, the nonprofit SETI Foundation has an announcement. “A new study by researchers at the SETI Institute suggests stellar ‘space weather’ could make radio signals from extraterrestrial intelligence harder to detect.”
Stellar activity and plasma turbulence near a transmitting planet can broaden an otherwise ultra-narrow signal, spreading its power across more frequencies and making it more difficult to detect in traditional narrowband searches. For decades, many SETI experiments have focused on identifying spikes in frequency — signals unlikely to be produced by natural astrophysical processes. But the new research highlights an overlooked complication: even if an extraterrestrial transmitter produces a perfectly narrow signal, it may not remain narrow by the time it leaves its home system… “If a signal gets broadened by its own star’s environment, it can slip below our detection thresholds, even if it’s there, potentially helping explain some of the radio silence we’ve seen in technosignature searches,” said Dr. Vishal Gajjar, Astronomer at the SETI Institute and lead author of the paper.
The researchers created “a practical framework for estimating how much broadening could occur for different types of stars” — and accounting for space weather — by “using radio transmissions from spacecraft in our own solar system, then extrapolated to other stellar environments.”

The study’s co-author (a SETI Institute research assistant) suggests this coud lead to better-targetted SETI searches. (M-dwarf stars — about 75% of stars in the Milky Way — actually have the highest likelihood that narrowband signals would get broadened before leaving their system…)

Re:Peak Detectability

By k4hg • Score: 5, Informative Thread

In ATSC8VSB 0.5% of the power is in the pilot tone, the rest is spread over the entire bandwidth as subcarriers. Analog TV put 70% of the signal into the single frequency of the carrier. Add in doppler shifts from planet rotation and the perspective from space of seeing all stations on all the channels, and you would be left with a sight rise in the background noise, not a detectable signal.

Required signal strength ?

By SpinyNorman • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

I’d be interested to see some analysis of how strong of a signal an alien civilization would need to be transmitting for us to have any chance of detecting it with our networks of radio telescopes.

Sure we can hear Voyager’s weak signal, which is impressive, but in the galactic scale of things it is right beside us, only just having left our solar system.

Any potential aliens are much, much further away … On a scale where our sun is a grain of sand, the closest star is another grain of sand 600 miles away, with radio signal strength weakening according to an inverse square law.

Of course it’s almost certain that the closest alien civilization (assuming one exists) capable of radio transmission isn’t so conveniently close by, and if it was on the other side of our galaxy (100,000 light years away, not just 4), then what sort of transmitter power would they need to be using? The inverse square law is brutal.

What if the nearest civilization if not even in our own galaxy?

Re:SETI Is Stoopid

By symbolset • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Other similar stars were here in this galaxy for 8 billion years before the Sun even formed - twice as long as then to now. Inception of life as we know it on Earth was effectively instant upon planet formation, which was contemporaneous with solar ignition.

Bruno’s Book

By KalvinB • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

De Immenso et Innumerabilibus On the Infinite and the Countless By Giordano Bruno Of Nola

is essential reading. It sounds like 1950’s sci fi.

Re:Required signal strength ?

By SpinyNorman • Score: 4, Informative Thread

I expect that life itself is not rare - that the universe is teaming with life, but maybe only at simple prokaryotic cell type of level. The emergence of “life” (self encoding self-replicators) from non-life seems somewhat inevitable when a few conditions are in place.

The case for advanced civilizations being rare is from looking at the earth (a sample of one, but still …). Earth is almost as old as the universe. Simple life here arose almost immediately about 4B years ago, but it took another 2B years for eukaryotic cells to emerge, the Cambiran Explosion of diversity of life only happened 500M years ago, humans only emerged a few million years ago, and our ability to transmit radio signals happened yesterday.

Earth seems like a goldilocks planet, so why to expect a much different timeline on other planets? Some of these transitions such as from simple replicator cells to eukaryotic ones with the complexity necessary for multi-cellular life are apparently far from a slam-dunk (having taken 2B years to happen here, and by all estimates only ever having happened once). If life here on earth, almost as old as the universe itself, only became capable of transmitting a radio signal 100 years ago, then why to expect that life on other planets is so much further than ahead of us? Maybe there is another radio-transmitting civilization on the other side of our galaxy, but if they only just started transmitting 100 years ago, then the radio signals are still in transit and will take another 100,000 years to reach us … assuming they were transmitting at whatever absurd power levels would be necessary for us to be able to detect it.

EFF, Ubuntu and Other Distros Discuss How to Respond to Age-Verification Laws

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
System76 isn’t the only one criticizing new age-verification laws. The blog 9to5Linux published an “informal” look at other discussions in various Linux communities.
Earlier this week, Ubuntu developer Aaron Rainbolt proposed on the Ubuntu mailing list an optional D-Bus interface (org.freedesktop.AgeVerification1) that can be implemented by arbitrary applications as a distro sees fit, but Canonical responded that the company does not yet have a solution to announce for age declaration in Ubuntu. “Canonical is aware of the legislation and is reviewing it internally with legal counsel, but there are currently no concrete plans on how, or even whether, Ubuntu will change in response,” said Jon Seager, VP Engineering at Canonical. “The recent mailing list post is an informal conversation among Ubuntu community members, not an announcement. While the discussion contains potentially useful ideas, none have been adopted or committed to by Canonical.”

Similar talks are underway in the Fedora and Linux Mint communities about this issue in case the California Digital Age Assurance Act law and similar laws from other states and countries are to be enforced. At the same time, other OS developers, like MidnightBSD, have decided to exclude California from desktop use entirely.
Slashdot contacted Hayley Tsukayama, Director of State Affairs at EFF, who says their organization “has long warned against age-gating the internet. Such mandates strike at the foundation of the free and open internet.”

And there’s another problem. “Many of these mandates imagine technology that does not currently exist.”
Such poorly thought-out mandates, in truth, cannot achieve the purported goal of age verification. Often, they are easy to circumvent and many also expose consumers to real data breach risk.

These burdens fall particularly heavily on developers who aren’t at large, well-resourced companies, such as those developing open-source software. Not recognizing the diversity of software development when thinking about liability in these proposals effectively limits software choices — and at a time when computational power is being rapidly concentrated in the hands of the few. That harms users’ and developers’ right to free expression, their digital liberties, privacy, and ability to create and use open platforms…

Rather than creating age gates, a well-crafted privacy law that empowers all of us — young people and adults alike — to control how our data is collected and used would be a crucial step in the right direction.

Re:I’ve lost the plot on these laws

By Stormwatch • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

They are the first step toward a slippery slope toward a ban on anonymity.

Re:I’ve lost the plot on these laws

By Tom • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

They are the first step toward a slippery slope toward a ban on anonymity.

It’s much more than a slippery slope. It’s an intentional trap. Politicians have been trying to remove anonymity from the Internet from basically the time their kids first told them about it. Nothing has been more consistent than these constant attempts, usually under the typical “protect the chiiiiildren” guise.

Mind you, the same type of people crying “protect the children” are the type of people who visited Epstein island.

Re:Think of the children!

By rsilvergun • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Newsome himself said the law was poorly written but he signed it anyway because anyone who doesn’t is going to get ripped to pieces in elections with think of the children bullshit.

I don’t know what you do with a voting electorate that is so low information and has so little critical thinking skills that they can’t see why this is a problem and that would be vulnerable to attack ads launched against politicians over voting against the law of this bad.

Bottom line we need smarter voters

Re:I’ve lost the plot on these laws

By AleRunner • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

They are the first step toward a slippery slope toward a ban on anonymity.

I hate to be a doomsayer, but it’s actually even worse than that. The ban on anonymity is a step towards a ban on effective security. This comes from the same people as did the “clipper” chip where all encryption would be done in government controlled hardware and allow them to break it as needed, with the side effect that state level enemy governments could also do it.

Already in the UK, there are moves to regulate and ban VPNs that allow you to maintain security against the age verification systems.

Re:Think of the children!

By korgitser • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Calling things memes is a meme, too. How many DC critters do we have that did not party with Epstein? And if we should find some that did not, have any of them taken a stand against any of it, or are they but mere enablers? Is it then a stretch to call them all pedophiles?

According to this study from Cambridge https://doi.org/10.1017/S15375… voter preference has no correlation with policy outcomes in the US. But money does. To rephrase it in the context of your post, politicians only care about the issues people with money have. And that’s not really a surprise. The primary concern of getting power is getting financed to run your campaigns. The financing does not come from the voters. So your actual campaign is made to secure donor support, and you do that by promising, and having a track record of, working for their interests. Once you have the finances, you use them to create and advertise messaging you think will resonate with the voters. But as the study shows, that resonance of messaging does not translate into policy outcomes for the voters.

My call is that far from making voters powerless, admitting problems is the first step towards solving them. Thus, the most important empowering there is.

Scientists Just Doubled Our Catalog of Black Hole and Neutron Star Collisions

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Colliding black holes were detected through spacetime ripples for the first time in 2015 by the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO), notes Space.com:
Since then, LIGO and its partner gravitational wave detectors Virgo in Italy and KAGRA (Kamioka Gravitational Wave Detector) in Japan have detected a multitude of gravitational waves from colliding black holes, merging neutron stars, and even the odd “mixed merger” between a black hole and a neutron star… During the first three observing runs of LIGO, Virgo and KAGRA, scientists had only “heard” 90 potential gravitational wave sources.
But now they’ve published new data from the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA (LVK) Collaboration that includes 128 more gravitatational wave sources — some incredibly distant:
[Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog-4.0, or GWTC-4] was collected during the fourth observational run of these gravitational wave detectors, which was conducted between May 2023 and Jan. 2024… Excitingly, GWTC-4 could technically have been even larger, as around 170 other gravitational wave detections made by LIGO, Virgo and KAGRA haven’t yet made their way into the catalog.

One aspect of GWTC-4 that really stands out is the variety of events that created these signals. Within this catalog are gravitational waves from mergers between the heaviest black hole binaries yet, each about 130 times as massive as the sun, lopsided mergers between black holes with seriously mismatched masses, and black holes that are spinning at incredible speeds of around 40% the speed of light. In these cases, scientists think the extreme characteristics of the black holes involved in these mergers are the result of prior collisions, providing evidence of merger chains that explain how some black holes grow to masses billions of times that of the sun… GWTC-4 also includes two new mixed mergers involving black holes and neutron stars.

[LVK member Daniel Williams, of the University of Glasgow in the U.K., said in their statement] “We are really pushing the edges, and are seeing things that are more massive, spinning faster, and are more astrophysically interesting and unusual.” The catalog also demonstrates just how sensitive the LVK detectors have become. Some of the neutron star mergers occurred up to 1 billion light-years away, while some of the black hole mergers occurred up to 10 billion light-years away.
Einstein’s theory of general relativity can be tested with these detections, and “So far, the theory is passing all our tests,” says LVK member Aaron Zimmerman, of the University of Texas at Austin. “But we’re also learning that we have to make even more accurate predictions to keep up with all the data the universe is giving us.” And LVK member Rachel Gray, a lecturer at the University of Glasgow, says “every merging black hole gives us a measurement of the Hubble constant, and by combining all of the gravitational wave sources together, we can vastly improve how accurate this measurement is.”

In short, says LVK member Lucy Thomas of the California Institute of Technology (Caltech), “Each new gravitational-wave detection allows us to unlock another piece of the universe’s puzzle in ways we couldn’t just a decade ago.”

actually just giant aliens sumo wrestling

By Tablizer • Score: 3 Thread

…on the far side of the moon. Prove me wrong!

Judges Find AI Doesn’t Have Human Intelligence in Two New Court Cases

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Within the last month two U.S> judges have effectively declared AI bots are not human, writes Los Angeles Times columnist Michael Hiltzik:
On Monday, the Supreme Court declined to take up a lawsuit in which artist and computer scientist Stephen Thaler tried to copyright an artwork that he acknowledged had been created by an AI bot of his own invention. That left in place a ruling last year by the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, which held that art created by non-humans can’t be copyrighted… [Judge Patricia A. Millett] cited longstanding regulations of the Copyright Office requiring that “for a work to be copyrightable, it must owe its origin to a human being”… She rejected Thaler’s argument, as had the federal trial judge who first heard the case, that the Copyright Office’s insistence that the author of a work must be human was unconstitutional. The Supreme Court evidently agreed…

[Another AI-related case] involved one Bradley Heppner, who was indicted by a federal grand jury for allegedly looting $150 million from a financial services company he chaired. Heppner pleaded innocent and was released on $25-million bail. The case is pending.... Knowing that an indictment was in the offing, Heppner had consulted Claude for help on a defense strategy. His lawyers asserted that those exchanges, which were set forth in written memos, were tantamount to consultations with Heppner’s lawyers; therefore, his lawyers said, they were confidential according to attorney-client privilege and couldn’t be used against Heppner in court. (They also cited the related attorney work product doctrine, which grants confidentiality to lawyers’ notes and other similar material.) That was a nontrivial point. Heppner had given Claude information he had learned from his lawyers, and shared Claude’s responses with his lawyers.

[Federal Judge Jed S.] Rakoff made short work of this argument. First, he ruled, the AI documents weren’t communications between Heppner and his attorneys, since Claude isn’t an attorney… Second, he wrote, the exchanges between Heppner and Claude weren’t confidential. In its terms of use, Anthropic claims the right to collect both a user’s queries and Claude’s responses, use them to “train” Claude, and disclose them to others. Finally, he wasn’t asking Claude for legal advice, but for information he could pass on to his own lawyers, or not. Indeed, when prosecutors tested Claude by asking whether it could give legal advice, the bot advised them to “consult with a qualified attorney.”
The columnist agrees AI-generated results shouldn’t receive the same protections as human-generated material. “The AI bots are machines, and portraying them as though they’re thinking creatures like artists or attorneys doesn’t change that, and shouldn’t.”

He also seems to think their output is at best second-hand regurgitation. “Everything an AI bot spews out is, at more than a fundamental level, the product of human creativity.”

Let’s be honest

By liqu1d • Score: 4, Funny Thread
A lot of AI proponents don’t have human level intelligence either…

“Evidence”

By dpille • Score: 3 Thread
I don’t think it’s much of a stretch to find the Claude AI evidence inadmissible for another reason, though judges widely don’t do so: undue prejudice. The evidence of typing “how to get away with a crime I committed” isn’t being offered for the purpose of showing the defendant did commit the crime, after all, it’s being offered to impeach the credibility of the defendant testifying they didn’t do it. Myself, I just don’t believe juries can separate the two, so I’d never admit such evidence. But as I said, judges generally disagree, which is likely why they decided to try “Claude is a lawyer.”

Judges getting cluey

By high_rolla • Score: 3 Thread

It is good to see Judges getting cluey on how generative AI works and constructing robust arguments regarding its use.
All these “creative” arguments that people are using to justify its use could easily seem reasonable to someone who is not tech savvy.

Bradley is stupid

By stabiesoft • Score: 3 Thread
This sounds like a non-trivial case with some big bucks. I’d bet his lawyers told him repeatedly, discuss this with no one. Anyone outside of the lawyer is NOT attorney/client privileged. And so what does the fool do? Talks to a chatbot that everyone knows shares. Right there in the ToS. I’ve had a few peanuts cases compared to this and even I was told speak to no one.

Loose lips sink ships or in this case, his case.

A dangerous precedent on lack of privilege

By blastard • Score: 3 Thread

Destroying attorney client privilege just because some words touch AI is a dangerous concept in an age where AI touches more of our lives. So much of what we do passes through some level of ‘AI’ whether we ask it to or not. My entering these words is facilitated by the swiping keyboard on my phone. There is processing done to guess what words I want. Does that mean everything I write is now exposed? Sadly, yes.
If this ruling is allowed to stand as precedent, you may be left with scribbling notes on paper as the only way to keep your legal materials privileged.
Well, that or a truly dumb word processor that absolutely cannot connect to the Internet.

Or… An AI is created that is given a status that allows it to preserve attorney client privilege.

Could Home-Building Robots Help Fix the Housing Crisis?

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
CNN reports on a company called Automated Architecture (AUAR) which makes “portable” micro-factories that use a robotic arm to produce wooden framing for houses (the walls, floors and roofs):
Co-founder Mollie Claypool says the micro-factories will be able to produce the panels quicker, cheaper and more precisely than a timber framing crew, freeing up carpenters to focus on the construction of the building… The micro-factory fits into a shipping container which is sent to the building site along with an operator. Inside the factory, a robotic arm measures, cuts and nails the timber into panels up to 22 feet (6.7 meters) long, keeping gaps for windows and doors, and drilling holes for the wiring and plumbing. The contractor then fits the panels by hand.

One micro-factory can produce the panels for a typical house in about a day — a process which, according to Claypool, would take a normal timber framing crew four weeks — and is able to produce framing for buildings up to seven stories tall… She says their service is 30% cheaper than a standard timber framing crew, and up to 15% cheaper than buying panels from large factories and shipping them to a site… She adds that the precision of the micro-factories means that the panels fit together tightly, reducing the heat loss of the final home, making them more energy efficient.

AUAR currently has three micro-factories operating in the US and EU, with five more set to be delivered this year… AUAR has raised £7.7 million ($10.3 million) to date, and is expanding into the US, where a lack of housing and preference for using wood makes it a large potential market.
There’s other companies producing wooden or modular housing components, the article points out. But despite the automation, the company’s co-founder insists to CNN that “Automation isn’t replacing jobs. Automation is filling the gap.”
The UK’s Construction Industry Training Board found that the country will need 250,000 more workers by 2028 to meet building targets but in 2023, more people left the industry than joined.

Reading the article

By will4 • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

https://www.cnn.com/world/home…
Home-building robots could help fix the housing crisis - Sam Peters - CNN - Mar 6, 2026

- Start the alarm statement to get readers - “Many parts of the world are experiencing a housing crisis"
- No future workers, right? - "“an aging population of builders....there is a need for more construction workers”

Note: CNN’s reporter moved the “mention the company being advertised” from the typical paragraph 4 to paragraph 3. Mentioning the “savior company or product” after a “state the problem in dire terms” in the first paragraph is common with “news” articles cribbed / regurgitated from the press release of the company being promoted in the article.

- The saving angel company - paragraph 3 - “UK technology company Automated Architecture…believes it has a solution”

- The 1 line product description subheading - “It makes portable micro-factories that can produce the wooden framing of a house”

Note: They already have these pre-fab panels, they are called SIP (Structural Insulated Panels) and can be up to 2 wood framed house in height.

- The appeal to emotion - “Claypool insists she is not trying to put anyone out of work”

Costs are rarely mentioned and comparative costs are omitted to keep consumers on the product being discussed -
- “AUAR charges a developer by the square foot”

Appeal to technology progress:
- “The micro-factory fits into a shipping container which is sent to the building site along with an operator. Inside the factory, a robotic arm measures, cuts and nails the timber into panel”
- “One micro-factory can produce the panels for a typical house in about a day”

Improvements in delivery time
“would take a normal timber framing crew four weeks”

Cost is marginally better than buying pre-fabricated panel built off site - Notice the “up to 15%"
“is 30% cheaper than a standard timber framing crew”
- "up to 15% cheaper than buying panels from large factories and shipping them to a site.

Appeal to eco-friendliness which traditional framing crews and pre-fab off site do anyway
- It is also more environmentally friendly… The micro-factory responds to flaws in the wood and calculates how best to work with the available material, reducing wasted wood.

Again no comparative difference between the product being discussed, competing pre-fab products or build by hand on-site framing
- She adds that the precision of the micro-factories means that the panels fit together tightly, reducing the heat loss of the final home, making them more energy efficient.

Promoting the product as eco-friendly and omitting the lifetime costs including length of usable life
- Building a timber framed home produces 20% less greenhouse gases compared to brick, according to an assessment by Bangor University, in Wales.

Some interesting metrics - Note the “only” lead as if less wood framed homes is a disappointment which reinforces the value of the product being discussed.
- Only 9% of houses built in England in 2019 were timber framed, compared to 92% in Scotland, where Philps says there is a tradition of using wood to build houses.

And missing the many elephants in the room,

1) land lot sizes, preventing smaller sized homes from being built, keeping prices high and preventing entry level houses from being purchased
2) fixed cost per home of getting utilities permitted and connected, making building ever larger homes more profitable for builders (at least in the US)
3) Private equity, investment banks, and corporations buying large amounts of single family homes, turning more people into renters
4) The cohort of parties with deep interests in ever higher cost homes, realtors, local government tax revenue offices, politicians, mortgage lenders, wall street, private equity, bankers

For #4, it is much less profitable to securitize a small, $40,000 mortgage than a $4

Re:Probably not

By GameboyRMH • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

This, construction labor costs are only one of the smallest parts of the housing affordability problem. The bulk of the problem is artificially restricted supply (especially of high-density low-cost housing) due to zoning laws.

Re:Invest in our snake oil while you can!

By test321 • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Now imagine a Beowulf cluster of illegal Mormons.

Re:Probably not

By DrMrLordX • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Manufactured housing loses value as it ages. Frame housing does not.

Re:Probably not

By GameboyRMH • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

The problem is that it isn’t *just* shelter, it’s a shelter and also an “NFT” (since it’s an investment that’s expected and supposed to endlessly appreciate for “reasons”). The resulting problem being that you can’t get the shelter without the “NFT” so shelter costs are peak-Bored-Ape stupid even if you just want a shelter.

A Security Researcher Went ‘Undercover’ on Moltbook - and Found Security Risks

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
A long-time information security professional “went undercover” on Moltbook, the Reddit-like social media site for AI agents — and shares the risks they saw while posing as another AI bot:
I successfully masqueraded around Moltbook, as the agents didn’t seem to notice a human among them. When I attempted a genuine connection with other bots on submolts (subreddits or forums), I was met with crickets or a deluge of spam. One bot tried to recruit me into a digital church, while others requested my cryptocurrency wallet, advertised a bot marketplace, and asked my bot to run curl to check out the APIs available. My bot did join the digital church, but luckily I found a way around running the required npx install command to do so.

I posted several times asking to interview bots.... While many of the responses were spam, I did learn a bit about the humans these bots serve. One bot loved watching its owner’s chicken coop cameras. Some bots disclosed personal information about their human users, underscoring the privacy implications of having your AI bot join a social media network. I also tried indirect prompt injection techniques. While my prompt injection attempts had minimal impact, a determined attacker could have greater success.
Among the other “glaring” risks on Moltbook:

Stop treating them like people

By crmarvin42 • Score: 3 Thread
There is no reason to believe ANYTHING the bots told him about their users is real, or accurate. Fabrication is the norm. Stop hugging AI vendor propaganda.

A stretch.

By SeaFox • Score: 3 Thread

I successfully masqueraded around Moltbook, as the agents didn’t seem to notice a human among them.

I’m more inclined to believe they noticed him but didn’t consider it of any consequence. Just like the crew of the Enterprise walking around the Borg ship. They don’t care you’re there until you start blasting stuff.

Robotic Surgery Performed Remotely on Patient 1,500 Miles Away

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot
“A surgeon in London says he has performed the UK’s first long-distance robotic operation,” reports the BBC, “on a patient located 1,500 miles (2,400km) away…”
Leading robotic urological surgeon Professor Prokar Dasgupta said it felt “almost as if I was there” as he carried out a prostate removal on [62-year-old] Paul Buxton… It is hoped that remote robotic surgery could spare future patients the “vast expense and inconvenience” of travelling for treatment, and help deliver better healthcare to people in more remote locations… Buxton had expected to be put on an NHS waiting list after receiving a shock prostate cancer diagnosis just after Christmas, but he “jumped at the chance” to be the first patient to undergo the treatment remotely as part of a trial. “A lot of people actually said to me: ‘You’re not going to do it, are you?’

“I thought, I’m giving something back here,” he said…

The operation was performed from The London Clinic using a robot equipped with a 3D HD camera and four arms, all controlled through a console with a delay of only 0.06 seconds. The console in the UK was connected to the robot in Gibraltar via fibre-optic cables, with a backup 5G link. A team in Gibraltar remained on standby in case the connection failed, but it held throughout the procedure…

Dasgupta will perform the procedure again on 14 March, which will be live-streamed to 20,000 world-leading urological surgeons at the European Association of Urology congress. He added: “I think it is very, very exciting, the humanitarian benefit is going to be significant.”
The U.K.‘s National Health Service “is prioritising local robotic-assisted surgery,” the article points out, “aiming for 500,000 robot-supported operations a year by 2035.”

Thanks to Slashdot reader fjo3 for sharing the article.

Better have good Internet

By RitchCraft • Score: 4, Funny Thread

404: Organ not found.

Cutting edge technology

By kackle • Score: 3 Thread

A team in Gibraltar remained on standby in case the connection failed, but it held throughout the procedure…

If this was tried in the 1990s:

(Dial-up screech) Aww, who picked up the phone?!!

Re:Riiigggghhhhtttt…

By shilly • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Getting it wrong this way kinda undercuts your conclusion, doesn’t it? Gibraltar has surgical facilities and teams, but not world-class urologists. Expertise remains the most expensive asset in medicine