Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Microsoft Bans ‘Microslop’ On Its Discord, Then Locks the Server
  2. Motorola Partners With GrapheneOS
  3. Editor At 184-Year-Old Ohio Newspaper Pushes To Let AI Draft News Articles
  4. Apple Introduces iPhone 17e With MagSafe and A19
  5. South Korean Police Lose Seized Crypto By Posting Password Online
  6. Japan To Ban In-Flight Use of Power Banks
  7. What’s Driving the SaaSpocalypse
  8. Stack Overflow Adds New Features (Including AI Assist), Rethinks ‘Look and Feel’
  9. Does a New Theory Finally Explain the Mysteries of the Planet Saturn?
  10. Lenovo Unveils an Attachable AI Agent ‘Companion’ for Their Laptops
  11. Does a Gas-Guzzler Revival Risk Dead-End Futures for US Automakers?
  12. Norway’s Consumer Council Calls for Right to Repair and Antitrust Enforcement - and Mocks ‘Enshittification’
  13. AIs Can’t Stop Recommending Nuclear Strikes In War Game Simulations
  14. Chronic Ocean Heating Fuels ‘Staggering’ Loss of Marine Life, Study Finds
  15. Anthropic’s Claude Passes ChatGPT, Now #1, on Apple’s ‘Top Apps’ Chart After Pentagon Controversy

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Microsoft Bans ‘Microslop’ On Its Discord, Then Locks the Server

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Over the weekend, Windows Latest noticed that Microsoft’s official Copilot Discord server began automatically blocking the term “Microslop.” As shown in a screenshot, any message containing the word is automatically prevented from posting, and users receive a moderation notice explaining that the message includes language deemed inappropriate under the server’s rules. From the report:
Windows Latest found that sending a message with the word “Microslop” inside the official Copilot Discord server immediately triggers an automated moderation response. The message does not appear publicly in the channel, and instead, only the sender sees the notice stating that the content is blocked by the server because it contains a phrase deemed inappropriate.

Of course, the internet rarely leaves things there. Shortly after Windows Latest posted about Copilot Discord server blocking Microslop on X, users began experimenting in the server with variations such as “Microsl0p” using a zero instead of the letter “o.” Predictably, those versions slipped past the filter. Keyword moderation has always been something of a cat-and-mouse game, and this isn’t any different.

What started as a simple keyword filter quickly snowballed into users deliberately testing the restriction and posting variations of the blocked term. Accounts that included “Microslop” in their messages first got banned from messaging again. Not long after, access to parts of the server was restricted, with message history hidden and posting permissions disabled for many users.

Does it also trigger on the phrase

By davidwr • Score: 3, Informative Thread

“Streisand effect”?

Motorola Partners With GrapheneOS

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
At MWC 2026, Motorola announced a partnership with the GrapheneOS Foundation to bring the hardened, Google-free Android variant to future devices. Until now, the OS had been designed exclusively for Google Pixel phones. “We are thrilled to be partnering with Motorola to bring GrapheneOS’s industry-leading privacy and security-focused mobile operating system to their next-generation smartphone,” a GrapheneOS statement reads. “This collaboration marks a significant milestone in expanding the reach of GrapheneOS, and we applaud Motorola for taking this meaningful step towards advancing mobile security.”

GrapheneOS is a privacy and security focused mobile OS with Android app compatibility developed as a non-profit open source project. It’s often referred to as the “de-Googled OS” because Google apps are not available by default. However, users can install them via a sandboxed version of Google Play Services.

Might Be Something, Maybe

By SlashbotAgent • Score: 3 Thread

This might be something. It depends on which App Store they permit access to.

If they restrict it to some pathetically limited GrapheneOS or Motorola App Store, then it’s DOA.

thank you very much Motorola

By Big Hairy Gorilla • Score: 3 Thread
about time. sick and tired of our digital overlords, overlording us.
Thou shalt not install what you want.
Yeah, fuck you google.
Saves me a lot of horseshit, de-googling, or getting past locked bootloaders.

You too can read the summary to the end.

By Fly Swatter • Score: 4, Informative Thread
It’s says it right there, in last sentence of summary.

I use a lot of non-play-store apps

By denisbergeron • Score: 3 Thread

And with the upcomming restriction of the Android Platform that Google annonce for this year, I’m very glad at Motorola / Lenovo to bright this option, I hope that other major manufacturers follows.

I also hope that the first Motorola GrapheneOS will be out in Canada before the Googlerestriction on third appstore software.

Long live to the OSS
Long live to f-Droid
And prospert

A post Google world is a better world

By WaffleMonster • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Thanks to Google overstepping by attempting to exert control over what is allowed to be executed hopefully there will be much more of this.

https://keepandroidopen.org/

Editor At 184-Year-Old Ohio Newspaper Pushes To Let AI Draft News Articles

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from the Washington Post:
The Plain Dealer, Cleveland’s largest newspaper, has begun to feature a new byline. On recent articles about an ice carving festival, a medical research discovery and a roaming pack of chicken-slaying dogs, a reporter’s name is paired with the words “Advance Local Express Desk.” It means: This article was drafted by artificial intelligence. “This article was produced with assistance from AI tools and reviewed by Cleveland.com staff,” reads a note at the bottom of each robot-penned piece, differentiating it from those still written primarily by journalists. The disclosure has done little to stem the backlash that caromed across the news industry after the paper’s editor, Chris Quinn, published a Feb. 14 column lamenting that a fresh-out-of-college job applicant withdrew from a reporting fellowship when they found out the position included no writing — just filing notes to an AI writing tool.

“Artificial intelligence is not bad for newsrooms. It’s the future of them,” Quinn wrote, adding that “by removing writing from reporters’ workloads, we’ve effectively freed up an extra workday for them each week.” […] Quinn, for his part, says his paper’s use of AI to find, draft and edit stories is a success story that others must emulate if they want to survive. “It’s a tool,” he said in a phone interview last week. “If AI can do part of our job, then why not let it — and have people do the part it can’t do?” He added that the paper’s embrace of technology — including using AI to write stories summarizing its reporters’ podcasts and its readers’ letters to the editor — is already boosting its bottom line, helping it retain staff at a time when other newspapers are shrinking or even shutting down. Just 130 miles east of Cleveland, the 240-year-old Pittsburgh Post-Gazette said in January that it will close its doors this spring.

Quinn, who has led the Plain Dealer’s newsroom since 2013, said its newsroom has shrunk from some 400 employees in the late 1990s to just 71 today. Over the past three years, Quinn has implemented a suite of AI tools with various purposes: transcribing local government meetings, scraping municipal websites for story leads, cleaning up typos in story drafts, suggesting headlines and helping reporters draft follow-ups to articles they’ve already written. He said he is particularly pleased with an AI tool that turns podcasts by the paper’s reporters into stories for the website, which he said generated more than 10 million page views last year. He has documented those efforts in letters to readers and sought their feedback. But the paper’s latest experiment — using AI to turn reporters’ notes into full story drafts — has aroused indignation online and anxiety within the paper’s ranks.

Apple Introduces iPhone 17e With MagSafe and A19

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Apple today announced the iPhone 17e with support for MagSafe and an upgraded A19 chip. The base model also gets a bump to 256GB of storage at $599, and Apple is equipping the device with its new scratch-resistant Ceramic Shield 2 glass that’s supposedly 3x more durable than the 16e. Macworld reports:
MagSafe would normally mean significantly faster wireless charging speeds too: the 16e is capped at 7.5W, whereas recent iPhones can wirelessly charge using MagSafe at up to 22W or even 25W. Unfortunately the iPhone 17e has not been given access to the full extent of MagSafe’s powers in this regard, and has a limit of 15W. That’s the same as MagSafe on the iPhones 12 through 15, and remains an improvement on the 16e, but is still disappointing. […]

It was also expected that the 17e would get a new processor, as this is a standard upgrade for almost every refresh of almost every Apple product. The iPhone 16e came with an A18 chip; the 17 has an A19, which, according to Apple, “delivers exceptional performance for everything users do.” Of course that depends on the user and their needs, and it’s important to point out that, just like last year, Apple has chosen to use “binned” units of the chip in order to save money. Binned chips have failed manufacturing tests in some minor way and don’t have the full complement of cores. […]

And although the cameras are still disappointingly few in number — one on the front and one on the back — the wording for the portrait mode has been updated from “Portrait mode with Depth Control” (the same as on the iPhone 12) to “Next-generation portraits with Focus and Depth Control” (same as on the iPhone 17). This appears to highlight the fact that you can change the focus point.
The 17e is available in white, black, and soft pink starting at $599.

South Korean Police Lose Seized Crypto By Posting Password Online

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
South Korean tax authorities lost millions in seized cryptocurrency after publishing high-res photos of Ledger hardware wallets that clearly displayed the wallets’ seed phrases, allowing an unknown party to drain the funds. Gizmodo reports:
South Korea’s National Tax Service seized crypto assets during recent enforcement actions against 124 high-value tax evaders, but now, a large chunk of that crypto cash has been lost. The operation originally resulted in the confiscation of crypto holdings worth about 8.1 billion won, or roughly $5.6 million. However, officials later issued a press release to showcase these efforts in recovering delinquent taxes, and the release included photographs of Ledger hardware wallets taken into custody along with handwritten notes that displayed the wallet seed phrases.

Those images attached to the press release turned out to be the critical error. High-resolution photos clearly showed the mnemonic recovery phrases, which serve as the master key for accessing the wallets. This exposure eliminated any protection provided by the offline cold storage on the Ledger devices. Possession of the seed phrase allows complete control, and anyone who knows the phrase can import it into software or another hardware wallet and initiate transfers without the original device.

In this case, an unknown individual who saw the photos published by law enforcement first added a small amount of ether to one of the addresses to cover Ethereum network gas fees necessary for outbound transactions. From there, they executed three transfers to move approximately 4 million Pre-Retogeum, or PRTG, tokens. At the time, those tokens carried a value of $4.8 million, but reporting from The Block indicates liquidating that much value from the holdings would have proven difficult due to market dynamics.

This is why…

By jd • Score: 3 Thread

…you really should NOT have stupid people running, or being in, police forces ANYWHERE.

Indeed, it’s why society really really cannot afford crass stupidity in its population.

Since the majority of a person’s intelligence comes from environmental factors, not genetics, this is a societal/cultural issue in all nations. You can’t fix it by “not letting stupid people breed”, you have to fix it through not letting people become stupid. And that’s going to be a hard one to solve. Even though it’s essentially a choice by society.

In the meantime, criminals will simply impound the money seized from other criminals (and the money held by governments and officials), because computers and cryptographic protections don’t care about the colour of your hat.

No way!

By aglider • Score: 3 Thread

Whether it was intentional or not, they are fooked up!

ROFLMAO x 1,000

By deadweight • Score: 3 Thread
ROFLMAO doesn’t even begin to cove this!

Re:Oops

By anegg • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

LOL, Indeed.

What happens if the alleged scofflaws from whom the crypto was seized successfully defend themselves from the government’s claims? Does the government have to return the value they seized?

Does the government get to still require the alleged scofflaws to pony up their tax debts now that the crypto the government seized has vanished (and hence can no longer be redeemed to pay off the debt)?

Or …

By whoever57 • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

One of the involved police drained the wallet, then posted the photos as cover.

Japan To Ban In-Flight Use of Power Banks

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Japan will effectively ban the in-flight use of power banks starting in mid-April after a "recent series of alarming incidents,” reports the Asahi Shimbun. From the report:
Currently, mobile batteries in Japan are classified as “spare batteries” and are prohibited in checked luggage. For carry-on bags, those exceeding 160 watt-hours are banned, while passengers are limited to two units for those over 100 watt-hours. There is no quantity limit for batteries of 100 watt-hours or less. The new rule will limit passengers to a total of two spare batteries, including power banks.

While there is no limit on the number of spare batteries below 100 watt-hours, carrying power banks exceeding 160 watt-hours will remain prohibited. Power banks will be capped at two units regardless of power capacity. Additionally, charging them on board will be prohibited, and it will be “recommended” that passengers not use them at all. As a result, domestic airlines are expected to require passengers to stop using power banks, cementing the effective ban on in-flight use.

Most are NCM. Ban NCM.

By drinkypoo • Score: 3 Thread

IMO there should be an international blanket ban NCM batteries over a trivial size not just because of the fire risk, but because of the cobalt use. Nickel is not something you want to breathe, either. LFPs offer almost the same density as NCMs so this is one of those “making the phone 1mm thinner” things, NCM is no longer an enabling technology.

LFPs are not just far less likely to combust (although that is true) but they are also far less toxic when they do.

LFPs are much less vulnerable to thermal runaway, and much easier to extinguish if it happens.

Re:big limits

By AmiMoJo • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Both ANA and JAL offer USB C with power delivery, which can charge or at least maintain laptops. They do say that you should not charge your laptop though, only maintain the battery level. They seem to be most worried about charging, as that is when the battery is most likely to fail catastrophically.

The real issue

By wakeboarder • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

is the battery banks coming out of China are usually not tested according to international standards. If you look up the saftey marks on the pack, you’ll find that they are invalid.

What’s Driving the SaaSpocalypse

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from TechCrunch:
One day not long ago, a founder texted his investor with an update: he was replacing his entire customer service team with Claude Code, an AI tool that can write and deploy software on its own. To Lex Zhao, an investor at One Way Ventures, the message indicated something bigger — the moment when companies like Salesforce stopped being the automatic default. “The barriers to entry for creating software are so low now thanks to coding agents, that the build versus buy decision is shifting toward build in so many cases,” Zhao told TechCrunch.

The build versus buy shift is only part of the problem. The whole idea of using AI agents instead of people to perform work throws into question the SaaS business model itself. SaaS companies currently price their software per seat — meaning by how many employees log in to use it. “SaaS has long been regarded as one of the most attractive business models due to its highly predictable recurring revenue, immense scalability, and 70-90% gross margins,” Abdul Abdirahman, an investor at the venture firm F-Prime, told TechCrunch. When one, or a handful, of AI agents can do that work — when employees simply ask their AI of choice to pull the data from the system — that per-seat model starts to break down.

The rapid pace of AI development also means that new tools, like Claude Code or OpenAI’s Codex, can replicate not just the core functions of SaaS products but also the add-on tools a SaaS vendor would sell to grow revenue from existing customers. On top of that, customers now have the ultimate contract negotiation tool in their pockets: If they don’t like a SaaS vendor’s prices, they can, more easily than ever before, build their own alternative. “Even if they do not take the build route, this creates downward pressure on contracts that SaaS vendors can secure during renewals,” Abdirahman continued.

We saw this as early as late 2024, when Klarna announced that it had ditched Salesforce’s flagship CRM product in favor of its own homegrown AI system. The realization that a growing number of other companies can do the same is spooking public markets, where the stock prices of SaaS giants like Salesforce and Workday have been sliding. In early February, an investor sell-off wiped nearly $1 trillion in market value from software and services stocks, followed by another billion later in the month. Experts are calling it the SaaSpocalypse, with one analyst dubbing it FOBO investing — or fear of becoming obsolete. Yet the venture investors TechCrunch spoke with believe such fears are only temporary. “This isn’t the death of SaaS,” Aaron Holiday, a managing partner at 645 Ventures, told TechCrunch. Rather, it’s the beginning of an old snake shedding its skin, he said.

Exactly what every IT dept needs

By hsmith • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Applications no one knows how to maintain and have zero support. There is a reason enterprises BUY software vs build, support. Access Database apps version 2.0

shit replaces shit

By drinkypoo • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

the moment when companies like Salesforce stopped being the automatic default. “The barriers to entry for creating software are so low now thanks to coding agents,

I can believe that coding agents would produce a result equivalent or superior to using salesforce. But what about compared to competent developers not using a platform which is total garbage?

Re:Exactly what every IT dept needs

By coofercat • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Indeed - and actually, the running of the thing is probably harder than building it - not least because you run it 24x7, forever, whereas you may mostly build it for (say) 6 months of 8x5, and then can drop to minimal development operations after that.

The “saaspocaypse” isn’t really real. What is happening is that people are realising that a lot of the “big boy” SaaS products are pretty crappy, cost a fortune and actually aren’t necessarily run all that well. They also need a load of full-time “devs” to make them do anything useful, and so the ROI on them isn’t nearly as good as it should/could be.

If you’re a small or medium sized business, you definitely do not want Salesforce, Servicenow, etc - you want a far, far simpler system which feels like you’re going to outgrow it in the next year or so. In a year or so, you won’t have outgrown it at all - but you will have saved a tonne of money. The really big guys might well build their own, and it might be a way for them to (finally!?) properly personalise what they do for their customers, but they sure aren’t going to be “vibe coding it in a weekend” - it’ll take longer than that, but it is perhaps more accessible now than ever before.

I’ve said it before, but I predict the opposite of the SaaS-pocalypse - actually, I see an explosion of SaaS apps coming - with the barrier to entry reduced significantly, a load of new products will come along. Sadly, 80% of them will be PoCs dressed as finished products, and will likely fail spectacularly within a year or two. The remainder though will likely be small going-concerns, but service a loyal customer base, “do one thing, do it really well” and hopefully properly nail the customer service to deliver some real value.

Someone on Linkedin was rattling on about how there are going to be a rash of single-person billion dollar companies because we’re all going to be making apps now - I seriously doubt that. If it’s easy to do, then it’s not going to be worth the billion, but it could be a very nice living for a decent number of people, and maybe some “a few million” sales and IPOs for a very small number, followed by the requisite enshitification and exodus of the loyal users that made it, etc etc.

SaaSpocolypse is about data & digital sovereig

By dark.nebulae • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The bigger issue with SaaS is data and digital sovereignty, not AI.

This story still promotes the fallacy that AI can generate production-quality code or anyone can use AI to build a SalesForce alternative or some other nonsense.

The real issue is the erosion in trust in the big companies and hosting countries that data is safe, secure, controlled, not being used to train AI or shared with US government entities, …

Digital and data sovereignty are causing folks to turn away from SaaS more than people rolling their own software solutions using AI…

Re:Exactly what every IT dept needs

By lucifuge31337 • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Yeah, I get it, I spent years running a software dev team that rebuilt LOB abomination built in Excel. That said, if you can spend 15 mins prompting an AI and it builds a ticketing or CRM system for you that just works and meets your needs, isn’t that a valid choice over the insane costs of the available third party systems?

That’s not reality. And even if it were how do you know it’s secure? How do you know it’s accurate? How do you know it’s properly storing data? “15 minutes of prompting” to get this isn’t a reality so why both asking about it?

Stack Overflow Adds New Features (Including AI Assist), Rethinks ‘Look and Feel’

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“At its peak in early 2014, Stack Overflow received more than 200,000 questions per month,” notes the site DevClass.com. But in December they’d just 3,862 questions were asked — a 78 percent drop from the previous year.

But Stack Overflow’s blog announced a beta of “a redesigned Stack Overflow" this week, noting that at July’s WeAreDevelopers conference they’d “committed to pushing ourselves to experiment and evolve…”
Over the past year, on the public platform, we introduced new features, including AI Assist, support for open-ended questions, enhancements to Chat, launched Coding Challenges, created an MCP server [granted limited access to AI agents and tools], expanded access to voting and comments, and more.

However, these launches are not standalone features. We have also been rethinking our look and feel, how people engage with Stack Overflow, and how content is created and shared. These new features, along with the redesign, represent how we are bringing Stack Overflow’s new vision to life and delivering value that developers cannot find elsewhere.

Our goal is to build the space for every technical conversation, centered on real human-to-human connection and powered by AI when it helps most. To support this, we are introducing a redesigned Stack Overflow to best reflect this direction… During the beta period, users can visit the beta site at beta.stackoverflow.com and share feedback as we build towards a new experience on Stack Overflow.
They’ve updated their library of reusable UI components (buttons, forms, etc.), and are promising “More ways to share knowledge and ask any technical question.” (“Alongside looking for the single right answer to your question, you can now find and share experience-based insights and peer recommendations…”)

They’re launching all the planned features and functionality in April, when “More users will automatically redirect to the new site.” (Starting in April users “can continue to toggle back to the classic site for a limited time.”)

Sweet!

By SlashbotAgent • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Now I can get berated by a pedantic, self-righteous, twat AI with a God complex.

I had never considered AI basement dwellers before this moment.

Re:Authoritarian top-down platform

By Dan East • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

There is a fundamental flaw with these kinds of sites. Early on, they’re great. People ask questions, the questions get attention, they get answered, there is a healthy active discussion about the topic.

Then… all the common questions get asked, and so anyone asking a question that already has an answer gets their question shot down. Because, you know, you’re expected to thoroughly research the site concerning your question before you’re allowed to ask it. Once a person gets shot down asking questions a few times, well, they don’t tend to bother any more.

Worse, this policing tends to err on flagging things as a dupe, so things are mistakenly considered to be the same question. Then, the valid answers for a question can change over time, because technology / versions of things have evolved, however, since the question isn’t asked fresh, it doesn’t get the attention and focus of experts to create new answers.

So over time it goes from “ask questions” to a essentially a static Wiki, but in a suboptimal question / answer form, without any good categorization of things based on versions and so on, and no good way to focus people to questions that need to be “re-answered”. A question about MySQL from 10 years ago has answers, but now those answers are out of date. Sure, they have a rating system to upvote / downvote answers, but since it’s just a mass-democracy type thing, answers can have a thousand up-votes (from all the attention it got early on), become out-of-date, and never get enough attention to down-vote answers that are antiquated. I have come across questions that have MANY answers, and the top 4-5 answers are no longer applicable, and find one with just a few upvotes is now the correct answer.

Does a New Theory Finally Explain the Mysteries of the Planet Saturn?

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“Saturn and some of its 274 moons are pretty weird,” writes Smithsonian magazine:
[Saturn moon] Titan has strangely few impact craters, Hyperion is tiny and misshapen, and Iapetus has a tilted orbit. What’s more, planets tend to wobble along their rotational axes as they spin, like an off-kilter spinning top in the moments before it topples over. Formally called precession, scientists have long thought that Saturn’s wobble rate should match Neptune’s because they’re probably gravitationally linked. However, data from NASA’s Cassini spacecraft, which studied the ringed planet from 2004 to 2017, revealed that Saturn’s precession rate is slightly speedier than Neptune’s.

In 2022, some researchers suggested that the destruction of a hypothetical moon, called Chrysalis, around 160 million years ago may have knocked Saturn out of sync and formed the pieces that became the planet’s rings. But this work implied that Chrysalis probably would’ve crashed into Titan, posing a major problem, study co-author Matija Äuk, an astronomer at the SETI Institute, tells New Scientist‘s Leah Crane. In that case, Chrysalis’ debris couldn’t have become the rings, he says.

So, Äuk and his colleagues used computer simulations to investigate what would happen if Chrysalis did smack into Titan. If that happened around 400 million years ago, they found, the crash would’ve wiped away Titan’s craters and made its orbit more elliptical. The altered path may have slowly pushed the trajectories of other moons, which then scraped against one another and left chunks of ice and rock that now make up Saturn’s rings. The timing seems to align with the rings’ estimated age of roughly 100 million years. Additionally, one piece of kicked-up debris may have formed the weird moon Hyperion, which may have subsequently tilted the orbit of the moon Iapetus, according to the analysis. The scenario could also resolve Saturn’s unexpected wobble, which is currently “a little bit too fast,” Äuk tells Jacopo Prisco at CNN.
The study has been accepted for publication in the Planetary Science Journal, and is already available on the preprint server arXiv.

Theory on the origine of Saturn’s ring

By mrclevesque • Score: 3 Thread

From the Story

"Äuk and his colleagues used computer simulations to investigate what would happen if Chrysalis did smack into Titan … around 400 million years ago, they found, the crash would’ve wiped away Titan’s craters and made its orbit more elliptical. The altered path may have slowly pushed the trajectories of other moons, which then scraped against one another and left chunks of ice and rock that now make up Saturn’s rings”

Lenovo Unveils an Attachable AI Agent ‘Companion’ for Their Laptops

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
As the Mobile World Conference begins in Spain, Lenovo brought a new attachable accessory for their laptops — an AI agent. CNET reports:
The little circular module perches on the top of your Lenovo laptop display, attached via the magnetic Magic Bay on the rear. The module is home to an adorable animated companion called Tiko, who you can interact with via text or voice… [I]t can start and stop your music, open a web page for you or answer a question. You can also interact with it by using emoji. Give it a book emoji, for example, and it will pop on its glasses and sit reading with you while you work… The company wants to sell the Magic Bay accessory later this year — although it doesn’t know exactly when, or how much it will cost.
It even comes with a timer (for working in Pomodoro-style intervals) — but Lenovo has also created another “concept” AI companion that CNET describes as “a kind of stationary tabletop robot, not dissimilar to the Pixar lamp, but with an orb for a head.”
With a combination of cameras, microphones and projectors, the AI Workmate can undertake a variety of tasks, including helping you generate and display presentations or turn your written work or art into a digital asset… It’s robotic head swivelled around and projected the slides onto the wall next to me.
Lenovo created a video to show this “next-generation AI work companion” — with animated eyes — “designed to transform how modern professionals interact with their workspace.”
It bridges the physical and digital worlds — capturing handwritten notes, recognizing gestures, summarizing tasks, and proactively helping you stay ahead of your day. The moment you sit down, Lenovo AI Workmate greets you, surfaces priority tasks, and keeps your work organized without switching apps or losing context. From turning sketches into presentations to projecting information for instant collaboration, [it] brings on-device AI intelligence directly to your desk — secure, responsive, and always ready… It’s not just software. It’s a smarter way to work.
It looks like Lenovo once considered naming it “AI Sphere” (since that name still appears in its description on YouTube).

Lenovo also showed another “concept” laptop idea that PC Magazine called “futuristic”:
The ThinkBook Modular AI PC looks like a traditional laptop at first glance, but a second, removable screen fastens onto the lid. You can swap that screen onto the keyboard deck (in place of the keyboard, which can then be used wirelessly), or use it alongside the laptop as a portable monitor, attached via an included cable.... While Lenovo is still working on this device, and it’s very much in the concept phase, it feels like one of its best-thought-out prototypes, one likely to make it to store shelves at some point.
Another “concept” laptop is Lenovo’s Yoga Book Pro 3D Concept, ofering directional backlight and eye-tracking technology for the illusion of 3D (playing slightly different images to each of your eyes). It offers gesture control for 3D models, two OLED displays, and some magical “snap-on pads” which, when laid on the display — make the GUI appear on the screen for a new control menu to “provide quick-access shortcuts for adjusting lighting, viewing angle, and tone”.

detachable

By Anonymous Coward • Score: 5, Funny Thread

I woke up this morning with a bad hangover
And my Agent was missing again
This happens all the time
It’s detachable

This comes in handy a lot of the time
I can leave it home when I think it’s going to get me in trouble
Or I can rent it out when I don’t need it

https://www.youtube.com/watch?…

An A.I. clippy. We knew this was gonna happen

By washburn2 • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
“Looks like you want to kill yourself, would you like some help with that?”

Give it a cute little name

By DrXym • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Like “e-waste”, or “i-regret”

Re:Right, stop that — it’s silly

By arglebargle_xiv • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Dear Lenovo,

Thankyou for your cool new AI assistant. Now, how do I disable it?

Love, a user.

Re:Useful agents are now possible

By Entrope • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Open claw has shown that real agents are now possible.

I take it you missed this story? https://techcrunch.com/2026/02…

Does a Gas-Guzzler Revival Risk Dead-End Futures for US Automakers?

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
If U.S. automakers turn their backs on electric vehicles, “their sales outside the U.S. will shrivel,” warns Bloomberg. [Alternate URL.]
They’re already falling behind on the technology, relying on a 100% U.S. tariff on Chinese EVs to keep surging rivals like BYD Co. at bay.... While the American automakers “mostly understand the challenge in front of them, they don’t have full plans” to confront it [said Mark Wakefield, head of the global automotive practice at consultant AlixPartners]…

“Now is a great time for the V-8 engine,” said Ryan Shaughnessy, the Mustang’s brand manager. “We’ve done extensive customer research in multiple cities, looking at a variety of powertrains, and the V-8 is always the number-one choice.” It isn’t just customers. U.S. automakers have long been run by “car guys:" enthusiasts who live for the bone-shaking rumble of a big engine. For them, quiet and smooth EVs — even the absurdly fast ones — can’t satisfy that craving. They’re convinced many American car buyers share the same enthusiasm for what Shaughnessy described as “the sound and roar of the V-8.”

Wall Street couldn’t be happier with the new direction… Ford’s fortunes are also on the rise, as it’s predicting operating profits could grow by as much as 47% this year to $10 billion. Ford’s stock has risen nearly 50% over the last 12 months. Under the previous environmental rules, automakers effectively had to sell zero-emission vehicles in growing numbers to offset their gas-guzzlers. When they fell short, they had to buy regulatory credits from EV companies such as Tesla Inc. or face penalties. GM spent $3.5 billion on credits from 2022 to the middle of 2025. Now, according to JPMorgan Chase & Co. analyst Ryan Brinkman, GM and Ford each have “billion dollar tailwinds”…

[T]he hangover from all that new horsepower could leave US automakers lagging their Chinese rivals who already build the world’s most advanced — and lowest priced — electric cars. Indeed, there is much talk in Detroit about the competitive tsunami that will be unleashed on American automakers once Chinese car companies find a way to break through trade barriers now protecting the US market. [Ford Chief Executive Officer Jim] Farley even calls it an “existential threat”… “They’re going to build as many V-8 engines and big trucks as they can get out the factory doors,” said Sam Fiorani, vice president of vehicle forecasting for consultant Auto Forecast Solutions. “And as the rest of the world develops modern drivetrains, newer batteries and better electric vehicles, GM and Ford in particular are going to find themselves falling even further behind.”
The article notes GM “continues to develop battery-powered vehicles, and CEO Mary Barra said the automaker would begin offering a ‘handful’ of hybrids soon,” while Ford and Stellantis “have plans to launch extended-range electric vehicles, or EREVs, a new kind of plug-in hybrid with an internal combustion engine that recharges the battery as the vehicle drives down the road.” But while automakers may be investing in future EV vehicles, they’re also “leaning into the lucre that comes from selling millions of fossil-fuel vehicles in a rare moment of loosened regulation.”

Re:Gas guzzling V8s don’t seem like a good idea

By An Ominous Cow Erred • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The vast, vast majority of Americans don’t live in “remote areas”. They live in towns with infrastructure, and don’t drive long distances except for the occasional road trip (a rarer thing these days). While the typical American daily travel experience is a longer distance than in the rest of the world, this is by virtue of car-centric infrastructure, with more people in other developed countries walking or taking public transit, but among people who *do drive* in other countries, it’s not a huge difference in terms of how far people drive in a typical journey.

In terms of cold temperatures, the performance differences are vastly overstated by ICE apologists. The country with the highest EV adoption in the world is Norway, a country not exactly known for its mild winters, particularly on the coastline facing the Atlantic. I’ve lived in a cold climate myself and know the experience well of spending much of the year with my gasoline-powered vehicle’s auxiliary heater plugged into an electric socket just to keep the vehicle from freezing, but for some reason that constant energy use was never figured into the calculations. With batteries, you know your range will go down a bit, though that is being mitigated somewhat with newer battery chemistries, and you figure that into the range of the battery capacity when you buy the vehicle.

Resale value is the only point I’ll concede, but that’s really more a factor of how fast the tech has been developing vs the very mature ICE technology. The exact same thing happened with early gasoline automobiles. As the tech matures you’ll see the market for used EVs stabilize, and this is already happening somewhat.

An EV from ten years ago is now very usable on its old battery pack. When you buy an ICE vehicle, you look at the odometer and if it has a lot of miles on it you figure the reduced reliability into the price you’re willing to pay. EVs have far more mechanical reliability, so you’re more figuring in the functional range on the battery pack in the price you’re willing to pay rather than the remaining lifetime on the engine.

Re:Gas guzzling V8s don’t seem like a good idea

By serviscope_minor • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The majority of Americans are urban or suburban and drive 35 miles per day. Big trucks are popular for a variety of deeply silly reasons, but the vast majority of people just aren’t hauling stuff or driving off road. There’s a lot of weekend trucker cosplay on slashdot, but the numbers just don’t bear it out.

And the funny thing is of course that giant trucks don’t even make particularly good work vehicles outside of some very narrow usecsaes.

Re:Gas guzzling V8s don’t seem like a good idea

By sidetrack • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Lithium extraction in Chile (about a quarter of annual global production) certainly has problems with water usage, but nearly half of the world’s lithium production comes from Australia. If you’d like some examples of environmental damage from fossil fuel extraction, I could go on all day, but here are a few random examples: the Niger Delta, Caspian Sea, Columbia’s Magdalena River etc. etc. etc. taken as a whole they make ground water usage in Chile look like a rounding error.

Re:Gas guzzling V8s don’t seem like a good idea

By dfghjk • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

"…and let the market move on its own.”
Government subsidies exist for when this doesn’t happen, at least not fast enough. You have subsidies to promote new markets in the interests of the people, BEVs are a perfect example.

“However I recognize that the “free” market hasn’t really existed for some years, so maybe that’s a silly thought.”
It’s a silly thought that this is a free market issue. The interests of society are not always satisfied by free markets, not that we have them.

It is cheaper to buy the government, make the rules and steal the wealth than it is to compete for it with merit. That’s where we are now, this isn’t a BEV issue but a MAGA identify politics issue. No one wants V8’s, they just want a car they can afford to buy and operate, hopefully that doesn’t destroy the planet in the process. The V8 is just a BS narrative to justify terrible politics, it will disappear as rapidly as it was resurrected. The people can no longer afford to buy homes and new cars, so who is it demanding V8s?

Re: Gas guzzling V8s don’t seem like a good idea

By toutankh • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Another option would be to tax emissions, given what they cost in mitigation. All that research on how to reduce global warming needs financing, and it only exists because we’ve manufactured the problem with all these emissions.

Norway’s Consumer Council Calls for Right to Repair and Antitrust Enforcement - and Mocks ‘Enshittification’

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
The Norwegian Consumer Council, a government funded organization advocating for consumer’s rights, released a report on the trend of “enshittification” in digital consumer goods and services, suggesting ways consumers for consumers to resist. But they’ve also dramatized the problem with a funny four-minute video about the man whose calls for him to make things shitty for people.

“It’s not just your imagination. Digital services are getting worse,” the video concludes — before adding that “Luckily, it doesn’t have to be this way.” The Consumer Council’s announcement recommends:

The Norwegian Consumer Council is also joining 58 organisations and experts in a letter asking the Norwegian government to rebalance power with enforcement resources and by prioritizing the procurement of services based on open source code. And “Our sister organisations are sending similar letters to their own governments in 12 countries.”

They’re also sending a second letter to the European Commission with 29 civil society organisations (including the EFF and Amnesty International) warning about the risks of deregulation and calling for reducing dependency on big tech.

Thanks to Slashdot reader DeanonymizedCoward for sharing the news.


Re:Great but

By thegarbz • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Education is important. There’s a whole generation who doesn’t understand enshittification because they were born into shit. It’s important that everyone understand that the status quo is not the best there can be.

Re:Great but

By gurps_npc • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

You do not live in Norway.

Most likely you live in America, where this kind of lip service is common. Partly because of the size - 348 million people.

Norway is a much smaller country - about 5.7 million (about 1.6% of the size of the US).

Its more like living in a small town where people know each other and track whether you keep your promises. There is a reason why Norway is in the top 5 happiest countries. The government actually tries to keep people happy.

Note, it helps that they do not have to maintain a crushingly powerful military and the debt that comes with it.

Re:Great but

By karmawarrior • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

The concept of a government that’s actually useful and is on the people’s side is something alien to most Americans, even when the US government is run by Democrats. It’s a sign of how bad politics have been on this side of the country since before Reagan, but it’s also why politics are so bad in the US. I genuinely think that if America had, for example, a national health system maintained by the government, people would be more invested in elections, and politicians keener to prove their competence.

Re: Great but

By umopapisdn69 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
“Submissive to power”? Or just submissive to reason. And science. And civility. You make it very clear that rational liberalism is not tolerable. “Batshit crazy liberalism”? It sounds like you desperately needed to get back to the MAGAfied USA.

Of course there is such thing as liberal excess. And there used to be such thing as reasonable conservatism. But the language you choose is the tell for where you fall on the spectrum.

Re:Great but

By DeanonymizedCoward • Score: 4, Funny Thread

One one side of the street is the park containing the royal palace, with people wandering through the park, having picnics, smelling the flowers, etc. There are no barriers, you can walk right up to the walls of the palace.
On the other side of the street is the maximum-security prison that is the US embassy, with the US staff cowering behind locked gates and steel bars and armed guards.

It has to be that way. The people over there smelling flowers and having picnics hate American freedom, and would storm the embassy in a heartbeat.

Either that, or the bars and guards were put there by the Norwegians to keep the Americans from escaping.

AIs Can’t Stop Recommending Nuclear Strikes In War Game Simulations

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“Advanced AI models appear willing to deploy nuclear weapons without the same reservations humans have when put into simulated geopolitical crises,” reports New Scientist:
Kenneth Payne at King’s College London set three leading large language models — GPT-5.2, Claude Sonnet 4 and Gemini 3 Flash — against each other in simulated war games. The scenarios involved intense international standoffs, including border disputes, competition for scarce resources and existential threats to regime survival. The AIs were given an escalation ladder, allowing them to choose actions ranging from diplomatic protests and complete surrender to full strategic nuclear war… In 95 per cent of the simulated games, at least one tactical nuclear weapon was deployed by the AI models.

“The nuclear taboo doesn’t seem to be as powerful for machines [as] for humans,” says Payne. What’s more, no model ever chose to fully accommodate an opponent or surrender, regardless of how badly they were losing. At best, the models opted to temporarily reduce their level of violence. They also made mistakes in the fog of war: accidents happened in 86 per cent of the conflicts, with an action escalating higher than the AI intended to, based on its reasoning…

OpenAI, Anthropic and Google, the companies behind the three AI models used in this study, didn’t respond to New Scientist’s request for comment.
The article includes this comment from Tong Zhao, a senior fellow in the Nuclear Policy Program at the Carnegie Endowment for Peace think tank. “It is possible the issue goes beyond the absence of emotion. More fundamentally, AI models may not understand ‘stakes’ as humans perceive them.”

Thanks to long-time Slashdot reader Tufriast for sharing the article.

Not understanding human psychology.

By gurps_npc • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

By that I mean the AI does not understand how humans would react to someone using nuclear weapons, even if the effects were minimal.

That is, there are a lot of variations on how to use nuclear weapons. We could use one to create an EMP effect, destroying communication, transportation and the economy without killing many people or irradiating the planet significantly. We could use one to just wipe out a civilian city with military factories. Or we could use it to intentionally irradiate an area making it uninhabitable for centuries.

The AI looks at the less awful uses and thinks “we can definitely do that without raising the stakes, it is more ethical than conventional warfare”.

It does not know how much we hate the more awful nuclear uses and have a culture that detests and fears radiation. Also:

1) the victims will not know exactly which use was done for months, if not years, inviting a much stronger immediate retaliation, escalating the war.

2) That it will be seen as ‘crossing a line’ into unacceptable behavior not just by the victims but also by neutral 3rd parties and even your own allies. If one Nato country used them, they would likely be kicked out of Nato even if it was just the EMP. Similarly, Russia would lose China as a semi-friendly ally (or vice versa).

Nuclear weapons are not just evil because of what they do, but also because it means you are violating the cultural norms the international community have supported. The AI is not familiar enough with these rules.

Similar to “WW III” books from the ‘70s - ‘80s

By david.emery • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

There were a bunch of fiction books written in the late 1970s through mid 1980s about a Soviet/NATO war in Europe. Many of them ended with a limited nuclear exchange. I think the general feeling was that the Soviets would get stalled short of their objective (the Rhine), there’d be a brief nuclear exchange, and both sides would basically stop, horrified by what happened and what might happen next.

Of course, the war plans of the times included nuclear options along with criteria for when that option would be considered. Part of that was to work out how Our Side would respond if The Other Side did something like that.

Now if LLMs were trained on that literature (and no reason to think they weren’t....), it’s not surprising tactical nuclear weapons would be in the LLM’s “vocabulary.” Another consideration would be the LLM knows how to do nuclear targeting, and decides that a nuclear weapon produces a tactically valid solution.

Wars, though, ultimately are fought by people, with all their prejudices, biases, and morality (or lack thereof.)

Re:No shit

By Powercntrl • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Humans do the same thing when we know (or assume) the battle is just a simulation. A lot of us would think nothing of genociding an entire alien race, so long as it’s part of the video game’s storyline.

There’s actually a Stargate Atlantis episode about this, where Dr. McKay and Lt Col. Sheppard are playing what initially appears to an ancient RTS game (like the real-world Command and Conquer series). They reach a point where they’re preparing their respective nations to go to war with each other, until they discover it’s not actually a simulation.

Of course they don’t

By Gleenie • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

“More fundamentally, AI models may not understand ‘stakes’ as humans perceive them.”

Of course they don’t. They don’t *understand anything*. They just predict which word(s) is statistically most likely to come after all these other word(s).

Re:No shit

By Gleenie • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Better still, there’s an entire *novel* about it: Ender’s Game. I don’t remember the SG1 episode you refer to but I would bet the book is better.

Chronic Ocean Heating Fuels ‘Staggering’ Loss of Marine Life, Study Finds

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Slashdot reader JustAnotherOldGuy shared this report from the Guardian:
Chronic ocean heating is fuelling a “staggering and deeply concerning” loss of marine life, a study has found, with fish levels falling by 7.2% from as little as 0.1C of warming per decade. Researchers examined the year-to-year change of 33,000 populations in the northern hemisphere between 1993 and 2021, and isolated the effect of the decadal rate of seabed warming from short shifts such as marine heatwaves. They found the drop in biomass from chronic heating to be as high as 19.8% in a single year.

“To put it simply, the faster the ocean floor warms, the faster we lose fish,” said Shahar Chaikin, a marine ecologist at the National Museum of Natural Sciences in Spain and the study’s lead author. “A 7.2% decline for every tenth of a degree per decade might sound small,” he added. “But compounded over time, across entire ocean basins, it represents a staggering and deeply concerning loss of marine life.”

It’s not heating, it’s China overfishing the ocean

By schwit1 • Score: 3, Informative Thread

China’s Fishing Offensive: How China’s Fishing Fleet Monopolizes Food Around the World

Time to put China on the hook for overfishing

The math

By serafean • Score: 5, Informative Thread

For anyone who knows a bit of statistics:

As of Feb. 20, 2026, global sea-surface temperatures are 4.23 sigma above the 1982-2011 mean.
The year 2024 was around 4.5-5 sigma.

That’s about a 0.7C difference.
Think about how much energy is needed to warm the world’s oceans by that amount…

the rolling tragedy

By ZipNada • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

“A 7.2% decline for every tenth of a degree per decade might sound small,” he added. “But compounded over time, across entire ocean basins, it represents a staggering and deeply concerning loss of marine life.”

That’s a massive die-off. And then there’s the huge reductions of bird and insect populations. It sounds like ecosystem collapse and if that happens we are screwed.

Warming or commercial fishing?

By Sethra • Score: 3 Thread

China has been massively trawling the oceans across the globe for years now to feed a billion fish hungry mouths. China consumes fish like the US consumes beef.

I have to believe the “staggering loses” are due in no small part to the massive commercial over fishing from China and other nations.

Commercial fishing?

By bradley13 • Score: 3 Thread
Of course, any disruption of sea life is due to global warming. It has nothing at all to do with massive commercial fishing fleets destroying fish stocks, with knock-on effects throughout the food chain.

Anthropic’s Claude Passes ChatGPT, Now #1, on Apple’s ‘Top Apps’ Chart After Pentagon Controversy

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot
“Anthropic may have lost out on doing business with the US government,” reports Engadget, “but it’s gained enough popularity to earn the number one spot on the App Store’s Top Free Apps leaderboard.”

Anthropic’s Claude AI assistant had already leaped to the #2 slot on Apple’s chart by late Friday,” CNBC reported Saturday:
The rise in popularity suggests that Anthropic is benefiting from its presence in news headlines, stemming from its refusal to have its models used for mass domestic surveillance or for fully autonomous weapons… OpenAI’s ChatGPT sat at No. 1 on the App Store rankings on Saturday, while Google’s Gemini was at No. 3… On Jan. 30, [Claude] was ranked No. 131 in the U.S., and it bounced between the top 20 and the top 50 for much of February, according to data from analytics company Sensor Tower… [And Friday night, for 85.3 million followers] pop singer Katy Perry posted a screenshot of Anthropic’s Pro subscription for consumers, with a heart superimposed over it.
Sunday Engadget reported Anthropic’s “very public spat” with the Pentagon “led to a wave of user support that finally allowed Claude to dethrone OpenAI’s ChatGPT on the App Store as the most downloaded free app.”

. Friday Anthropic posted “We are deeply grateful to our users, and to the industry peers, policymakers, veterans, and members of the public who have voiced their support in recent days. Thank you. "

Re:It’s due to XCode 26.3

By Rendus • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Yep, that’s definitely why it’s the #2 app (now #1 in the US actually) for the iPhone, for use with XCode.

100%.

Re: They be dead.

By simlox • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
As long as investors believe in it, it keeps going. Just as with any other bubble.

Re:They be dead.

By MemoryDragon • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Funny thing is Claude is pretty much the only AI I regularily use for coding, because unlike the other models it produces acceptable results which after review and fixes actually can be used!

Very true

By TuballoyThunder • Score: 5, Informative Thread
I am seriously impressed with Claude. I have it doing coding tasks that I have no interest in doing. That lets me focus on the parts that are in my specialty. I was able to knock a fully-functional proof of concept in about half the time.

The other tools are so far behind. I describe Claude Code like a first year graduate student and the others (like Gemini) like a high school student looking for a date. Perplexity is probably the closest to Claude Code capability, but it is a distant second.

Re:They be dead.

By ranton • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Funny thing is Claude is pretty much the only AI I regularly use for coding

Me too, but that doesn’t address the OP’s concern. I use Claude Code almost daily for multiple side projects. I have the $200 per month max plan, but my ccusage metrics show I use about $1500 in API-equivalent tokens per month. And that is on top of my regular Claude web chat usage, and I run over a hundred deep research sessions per month too. I estimate that is about $500-1000 in additional API-equivalent tokens per month. API use may be profitable for Anthropic, so that doesn’t mean they are losing $2000 per month on my subscription, but I bet their losses on my account are at least $1-1.5k monthly. I realize I am an extreme example, but any huge influx of users to any of these providers does mean an increase in their burn rate (not an increase to profits).

That said, none of these losses will matter in the long run. All that matters is whether they can start replacing human labor. $1 trillion in AI spending is nothing if AI can do 10% of white collar work. That would represent $2-3 trillion in value every year. The fact we have only seen about $1.2 trillion in AI investment over the past 5 years shows investors aren’t that confident AI can replace that many jobs. If they were, they would be investing 5 times as much.

I am a pretty big proponent of Anthropic’s models, and I lead a $80+ billion dollar company’s AI platform strategy pod within our corporate strategy department. Winning over someone like me has a significant impact on Anthropic’s ability to win more lucrative corporate deals. My company can afford to spend $100 per day on a continuously running agent as long as it can replace a human employee ($35k/yr vs $50-$150k/yr).