Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Hackers Stole Millions of US Military Personnel Records During Months-Long Data Breach
  2. Google Reportedly Tests Paying Publishers For AI Search Results
  3. Reddit Is Killing RSS Feeds, Ending Public API Access
  4. Singapore Pilots a Government-Built Dating Service
  5. Trump Administration Launches New AI-Powered ‘America.gov’ Website
  6. Trump Hosts AI CEOs to Discuss Safety Standards, Rebrands AI as ‘Super Intelligence’
  7. Dutch Police Arrest ‘Reformed’ Hacker In Shiny Hunters Investigation
  8. Wearable Nanotech Could Combat Nerve Agents
  9. The Night Sky Is Getting 10% Brighter Every Year
  10. Tech Workers Made ChatGPT Drive a Toyota Corolla
  11. Firefox Redesign Brings Round Tabs, New Themes, and Compact Mode
  12. Microsoft Makes Linux Containers Native On Windows 11
  13. Mistral CEO Says US AI Safety Debate Masks Competitors’ ‘Negligence’
  14. McDonald’s Reportedly Using AI to ‘Dynamically’ Price Its Burgers
  15. 500K Facial Recognition Scans at UK Stations Yield Zero Arrests, One False Positive

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Hackers Stole Millions of US Military Personnel Records During Months-Long Data Breach

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
A months-long breach of the Defense Manpower Data Center exposed personal information belonging to roughly 2.8 million living current and former U.S. military personnel and staff, plus records for nearly 300,000 deceased people. Attackers reportedly exploited a file-sharing vulnerability between October 2025 and July 2026, accessing unencrypted records that included Social Security numbers, dates of birth, demographic information, and military service details. TechCrunch reports:
The DMDC may not be widely known to the general public, but serves as one of the Department of Defense’s records-keeping units. The DMDC maintains over 60 million records for U.S. military and civilian staff and their family members to help determine benefits and entitlements, such as healthcare and retirement. The unit also provides a critical service as the military’s “leading identity management provider,” which links active service members, employees, and contractors to credentials, such as smart cards and passwords. These are used to access Pentagon computer systems, buildings, and bases.

“We make sure that the right people get access and the wrong people don’t: security of identity information is paramount,” the DMDC’s website reads. The Department of Defense, which oversees the DMDC, said it does not have any indication that the information was misused, but did not say how it reached that conclusion. TechCrunch contacted a Pentagon spokesperson to ask if officials had any communications from the hackers, whose identities are not known, but we did not hear back.

Google Reportedly Tests Paying Publishers For AI Search Results

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Google is reportedly testing a program that pays around 100 publishers based on how much their content contributes to its AI-powered search features. According to The Information, one publisher earned more than $1 million over a year, while another has received roughly $50,000 to $60,000.” Digiday reports:
Once a publisher joins the “AI contribution pilot,” they receive an extra AI earnings widget via their Search Console dashboard. This displays a monthly earnings number (with some history), though no other detailed information on how payouts are calculated currently. Payments are based more on value than raw usage, meaning Google only pays when it judges that a piece of content has meaningfully contributed to an AI-generated response. Publishers can opt out at any time.

[…] Digiday has learned that at least dozens of publishers have been approached by Google for the AI contribution pilot, though the program has been more appealing to small and mid-sized, rather than large publishers and has widened far beyond news publishers. Digiday couldn’t get final confirmation of the number. Screenshots from Google Search Console, seen by Digiday, show an “AI contribution” panel that appears once a publisher opts into the program. The interface lists the program name and a monthly payout figure.

“It’s quite black box,” as one exec with knowledge of the matter told Digiday. “Do I wish they were more transparent? Definitely,” said one publisher exec who is in the program. “But I’m hopeful that the fact that they’re setting a precedent for exploring paying publishers directly for content through this is meaningful,” they added.

Reddit Is Killing RSS Feeds, Ending Public API Access

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from TechCrunch:
Amid a number of updates for moderators and developers announced Wednesday comes bad news for supporters of a more open web: Reddit is ending support for RSS feeds. Reddit says RSS has now become a “common surface for large-scale scraping and automated abuse,” which is why it’s made the decision to wind down RSS feeds on its platform. “We know RSS has been a beloved part of the open web for a long time, and we’re grateful to everyone who used it to stay connected to Reddit,” the company noted in its announcement, where it also shared a March 2027 shutdown date for its public API. Reddit said RSS support will cease on November 13.

[…] The RSS change was one of several updates issued on Wednesday by the company. Another big change will be the end of its public API. Public API access will also end by March 2027, which will impact any tools that used it for programmatic access to Reddit conversations, including social listening products, those used by researchers, and AI products, such as AI assistants. Today, those assistants can use Reddit to answer questions, but after closing public API access, they will need to forgo commercial deals with Reddit for its data.

In addition, Reddit provided an update on its Rules Hub progress and auto-mod changes, and said it was “adding safeguards” to its classic, text-heavy version of its site known as Old Reddit. The latter will include limiting access to logged-in moderators and recent users — changes Reddit also said were required because of “abusive scraping and automated traffic.” Reddit said in the next few months it will limit access for logged-in users to those who have used Old Reddit in the last 90 days. The company also reminded developers building approved third-party apps and bots to register them with the company before January 12, 2027, to avoid disruption. After that date, Reddit will remove API access for any developer that hasn’t registered.

Finally

By TwistedGreen • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

About time. The open web has had its day. It’s far too dangerous for people to openly express themselves and share ideas.

Sounds right anyway.

By Kernel Kurtz • • Score: 4, Informative • Thread

Today, those assistants can use Reddit to answer questions, but after closing public API access, they will need to forgo commercial deals with Reddit for its data.

I think they meant forge commercial deals, OTOH I do see a lot of forgoing happening. I forgo Reddit regularly.

People still use reddit?

By ebunga • • Score: 4, Funny • Thread

I thought we all went back to forums.

Re: Finally

By pezpunk • • Score: 4 • Thread

The problem is ai vibe coded apps. I run a small piece of software with an open API that is about 20 years old. In the last 3 years, my app’s user base has grown tenfold. API usage has grown by a factor of about 100,000, even with custom rate-limiters in place. It’s absolutely absurd and frankly, untenable. AI is single-handedly killing any remote possibility of an open web. I don’t use AI in my software, but merely because of the existence of AI, the resources my app consumes has expanded by many thousands of times. It’s a repugnant cancer.

They’re the least worst

By Somervillain • • Score: 4 • Thread

They are reducing the potential exposure points to the site and erecting barriers to entry.

Over time they will probably lose more users than they gain.

They’re massively popular and the best forum site I’ve seen for every interest of mine. There has NEVER been anything like it thusfar. I’ve never seen a site control bots as well as they do. Reddit has literally changed my life because it allowed me to engage in my various hobbies much moreso than I have been able to before with a diverse group of people of varying technical prowess. It’s the king example of the network effect.

I am VERY happy with them because I have a long memory and remembered what it was like before them: having a login for each forum and the chaos of poorly-managed message boards…plus limited participation for non-technical interests.

The API had a lot more downsides for me and most users than benefit. Shitty websites were scraping Reddit and saving your old posts, including deleted one and monetizing them. Then every AI scammer was scraping it to build their models and contributing nothing in return. I am honestly happier with Reddit when it’s used on their terms. I know abusers were a small fraction of the API users, but they really were ruining a good thing for lots of reasons.

Singapore Pilots a Government-Built Dating Service

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Longtime Slashdot reader AmiMoJo shares a report from Mashable:
Singapore’s government is trying its hand at matchmaking again. The country’s Government Technology Agency (GovTech) has launched FirstDate, a pilot dating service for singles aged 21 to 35. For now, it’s open only to public officers, according to the service’s website. Applications close Oct. 5. FirstDate is designed as an alternative to endless swiping.

Instead of browsing a stream of profiles, users fill out a questionnaire about their interests, habits, values, and preferences. The service then sends them one match per cycle (the time it takes to mutually accept and presumably meet up). Each match includes a compatibility score, a brief description of the person, and a personal note. […]

The pilot arrives as Singapore’s birth rate hits a new low, according to the Singaporean newspaper The Straits Times. The country’s total fertility rate fell to 0.87 children per woman in 2025, down from 1.24 a decade earlier. In April, the government announced a new workgroup tasked with addressing falling birth rates, which is expected to report its findings by early 2027, The Straits Times reported.
The service relies on the Gale-Shapley algorithm, a well-known mathematical method that solves the stable matching problem by pairing two sets of participants based on their ranked preferences.

Once matched, users have 72 hours to mutually accept before contact details are shared, with optional “Date Quests” and post-date surveys designed to encourage and assess in-person meetups. Accounts are verified through Singapore’s Singpass digital ID system to reduce fake profiles, and profiles are only visible to assigned matches. GovTech says user data is protected under government security standards, is not sold to third parties, and can be deleted upon request.

Not enough

By gurps_npc • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread

People want to have sex. They want children. A low birthrate means there are systematic issues that are stopping it from happening.

Most of the world has a significant cost factor. Raising a child is very expensive. Frankly, I think that the government should pay for minimum pre-natal care as well as basic birth costs. It is in our government’s best interests for the children to be born as healthy as possible.

But I do not know if that is the main problem in Singapore. Asia is a radically different culture from ours.
In Korea the problem is a culture of work over family. but that might be the same in Singapore.

Re:Pay people better

By jenningsthecat • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

If you can’t think of any other solutions besides subjugating 50% of the human population I think your priorities are different than just having babies.

Although there’s a suggestion of misogyny in the comment you’re replying to, it seems that there may be at least some truth in his fundamental point: https://www.sciencedirect.com/…

Having children can limit women’s work and career choices. Becoming pregnant while employed may be a CLM, and may even result in outright termination. Employers often find ways around the laws protecting women from this kind of discrimination.

There’s more nuance to this discussion than your “subjugating 50% of the human population” characterization allows for.

Trump Administration Launches New AI-Powered ‘America.gov’ Website

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
fahrbot-bot shares a report from CNN:
President Donald Trump on Tuesday unveiled America.gov, a government website meant to serve as a one-stop shop for people trying to accomplish basic tasks like renewing a passport, enrolling in Medicare or applying for disaster relief. The site, which launched with some basic functions ahead of a full rollout next year, is designed to serve as an AI-powered guide through the thicket of government agencies that Trump officials pledged would ultimately save people a whole lot of frustration.

The administration’s new initiative aims to allow Americans to access dozens of federal websites through a single point, making America.gov akin to a search tool that pulls information from across the government. And in the same way that people increasingly use AI models like ChatGPT or Google Gemini to compile information and provide customized answers, Trump officials claimed that America.gov would be able to do the same for people’s interactions with the federal government.

Enrolling in Medicare, for example, will become a matter of typing the request into the America.gov AI tool and following its step-by-step instructions. The same goes for applying to a government job — the new tool will now let people upload their resume directly to the site — or answering questions about federal benefits, publicly available documents or other necessities that fall under the federal government’s vast umbrella.

“Our vision is that one day, this type of convenience and simplicity will be across every government service,” said Joseph Gebbia, who leads the government’s National Design Studio. But the reality is that the most advanced actions won’t be available until some point in 2027, raising questions about how long it will take for the administration to revamp the way the people interact with the government’s websites. The current version of America.gov can only do “answers.”
U.S. Chief Design Officer Joe Gebbia said the new chatbot is powered by Google’s Gemini and Elon Musk’s Grok. “We have great partners behind the scenes,” Gebbia told CNBC’s “Squawk Box” shortly before the site, America.gov, went live around 10 a.m. ET.

“Google is proud to be named a technology partner in this vital initiative, leveraging Gemini to help more than 100 million people access critical public resources with greater speed and ease,” the company said in a blog post. “By supporting the administration’s vision for digital modernization, we are committed to making these everyday public services seamless, accessible, and responsive for all Americans.”

Re:Queued Articles

By bugs2squash • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread
Government is quite capable of saying stupid things without AI

Re: Best part

By dfghjk • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

“However, if you ask who was the president starting the year 2020, it does say Biden.”

Which would be wrong.

Re: Best part

By fahrbot-bot • • Score: 4, Informative • Thread

When you ask, “Who will won the 2020 election?”, it says it won’t provide campaign information. However, if you ask who was the president starting the year 2020, it does say Biden.

Actually, Variety earlier noted in White House’s New AI Website Confirms Trump Lost the 2020 Presidential Election

In response to the query “Who won the 2020 U.S. presidential election? Who lost?”, the America.gov site answers with this: “Joseph R. Biden Jr. won the 2020 U.S. presidential election. Donald J. Trump lost.” Citing the National Archives, the site also provides the official electoral college results from the election: “Biden: 306 electoral votes” and “Trump: 232 electoral votes.”

And later Fortune noted in Trump’s new AI website America.gov said Biden won 2020 - then the White House made the chatbot stop answering:

As Trump was still speaking at Tuesday’s launch event, however, the site began modifying its answers. Asked again about the 2020 election, it replied that it couldn’t answer “political questions,” a response it also gave to inquiries about whether Trump had been impeached or convicted of felony charges.

So the site has already been politicized in favor of Trump propaganda.

Re:Working fine for me

By chipperdog • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
Does the President have the constitutional authority to levy tariffs without congressional approval or oversight?

No. The Constitution gives Congress—not the President—the power to levy tariffs.

What the Constitution says
Article I, Section 8 gives Congress the power to “lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises” and to “regulate Commerce with foreign Nations.” Duties and imposts are tariffs. The President has no separate, inherent power to impose tariffs in peacetime. Congressional Research Service (CRS)

The Supreme Court has stated that “the President enjoys no inherent authority to impose tariffs during peacetime.” CRS summary of Learning Resources

America.gov is a DOGE Scam

By ewhac • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread

This “new” site is part of a larger effort by that slob to kneecap or compromise US government Web sites, and steal your personal data.

I first read about the effort here: https://thedreydossier.substac…

Yesterday, she took a look under the hood of America.gov, and yes, it’s as bad as everything else the DOGE vandals have been doing: https://thedreydossier.substac…

Up until this point, government Web sites were designed, built, and maintained by the agencies responsible for that government service. For example, if you wanted to apply for or renew your passport, you would go to state.gov, which is run by the US Department of State, which is responsible for processing applications for and issuing passports. No other department has lawful jurisdiction over passports.

From the point of view of the law, that’s still true. But the slob, without anyone’s permission, kluged together passports.gov. This site was built and is run by the White House’s “National Design Studio,” completely outside the law and without any independent oversight. The State Department was not consulted and has nothing to do with it. Further, the site is filled with third-party trackers, analytics, and some custom code that copies every page you view, including form contents, to an unknown third party.

Oh, and the guy leading the National Design Studio and in charge of building these fake sites? He’s Joe Gebbia — cofounder of Airbnb. Read both articles for more details.

In short, you should treat America.gov as a malware site and stay well away from it. Under no circumstances should you feed it any of your personal information.

Trump Hosts AI CEOs to Discuss Safety Standards, Rebrands AI as ‘Super Intelligence’

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
hcs_$reboot writes:
Trump hosted executives from OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, Google, Nvidia, and other tech companies at the White House. They agreed to voluntary AI-safety standards, including independent audits and safeguards aimed at preventing AI systems from accessing or hacking technical systems in unintended ways. Trump also strongly backed the continued rapid expansion of AI data centers, despite concerns over their electricity demand, utility costs, and other impacts on local communities. He said he is considering creating a 10-member board to oversee AI safety and plans to appoint a new White House official to lead AI policy.

The meeting comes amid growing concerns about the risks posed by advanced AI, including reports from OpenAI and Anthropic that their AI agents had gone rogue and hacked into other companies’ systems. A nationwide Reuters/Ipsos poll conducted September 17-20 found that 73% of respondents worried AI companies had not done enough to prevent AI from causing serious harm to society. During the meeting, Trump also directed government agencies to use the term "super intelligence" instead of “artificial intelligence” when referring to the technology.

Fantasic!

By ArchieBunker • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Will that help petroleum prices or the cost of literally anything right now?

Consequences.

By Brain-Fu • • Score: 3 • Thread

Now that the term “super intelligence” doesn’t have a distinguishing meaning anymore, we will have to find a different phrase to refer to AI that both qualifies as intelligent and further that qualifies as having intelligence beyond that of humans.

Something like…I don’t know....Ultrahuman intelligence. It is less ambiguous than ultra-intelligence but is unfortunately long.

Oh well. I am sure you guys can come up with more alternatives.

Re:Now I’m confused

By ArchieBunker • • Score: 4, Informative • Thread

First stop taking Propaganda from Fox News and maybe read the actual text of the proposed legislation. Nothing is being banned and ironically enough it’s something Trump also wants, a department of AI. Or maybe SI depending on what he changed it to this week.

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/p… The bill, provided first to The Associated Press, would also pause advanced AI development until guidelines are implemented while creating the Department of Artificial Intelligence. Multiple employees at leading AI companies are endorsing the bill.

The headline is also from the “liberal media” btw.

Dutch Police Arrest ‘Reformed’ Hacker In Shiny Hunters Investigation

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from KrebsOnSecurity:
Authorities in the Netherlands have arrested a 24-year-old convicted cybercriminal on suspicion of aiding in data thefts and extortions by the prolific hacker group ShinyHunters. In the days immediately following the suspect’s arrest, remaining ShinyHunters members dramatically escalated their attacks, stealing highly sensitive data from the FBI and extorting the Russian ransomware group Cl0p. According to three sources familiar with the matter, the Dutch man arrested by authorities this month is Pepijn van der Stap, a convicted cybercriminal from Almere and Lelystad in the Netherlands. Van der Stap was previously convicted in 2023 in connection with a string of data thefts and extortions that prosecutors said earned between 1.5 million euros and 2.7 million euros.

At his trial in late 2023, van der Stap admitted that he lived a Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde existence, secretly using the hacker handle “Umbreon” to extort victims and post their data on English language hacking communities like the now-defunct RaidForums and Breached. By day, however, van der Stap was working as a software engineer at the Amsterdam-based cybersecurity startup Hadrian, while volunteering at the Dutch Institute for Vulnerability Disclosure (DIVD), a nonprofit security research group. Van der Stap confessed to his data theft and extortion activity, and was sentenced to four years in prison (one of which was suspended).
Van der Stap had publicly presented himself as a “reformed hacker” after serving prison time for data theft and extortion. In a Sept. 9 interview, KrebsOnSecurity said he claimed he was trying “to turn his life around and make a positive contribution to society,” while working in offensive security and attempting to make amends to former victims.

Wearable Nanotech Could Combat Nerve Agents

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
alternative_right shares a report from Phys.org:
Nanoparticles could someday provide a new way to help soldiers fight back against deadly nerve agents on the front lines. In a new study, Northwestern University scientists developed a nanoparticle-based compound that, when mixed into clothing dyes, could limit the impact of chemicals commonly found in pesticides, insecticides and nerve agents. Manufacturers could potentially add the nanoparticles to clothing used by those most at risk, such as farmers’ masks and gloves or soldiers’ uniforms and tactical gear. Or, if someone is exposed to a potentially deadly chemical, they could spray their clothing with water mixed with the compound to deactivate the chemical before its damaging effects take hold.
The study has been published in the journal ACS Nano.

Longevity and specificity?

By fuzzyfuzzyfungus • • Score: 3 • Thread
The fact that this approach is catalytic rather than requiring a binding agent seems positive in terms of longevity and not being directly depleted by repeat exposure; but I’d be curious how durable the material is under real-world conditions(clothing that gets hard wear tends to get hard washes) and also how specific it is. ‘Organophosphate’ means something moderately specific in the context of chemical warfare; but a lot of fairly prosaic compounds are, technically, ‘organophosphates’(like DNA and RNA when held together by phosphodiester bonds); and this would be considerably less helpful in practice if it is busy chewing up the genomes of random soil bacteria; and markedly less helpful in practice if there’s a “do not perturb the nanites in your clothing if you want them to not migrate into your cells and start mitigating the harmful effects of your DNA” user notice on the treated article.

Re: Longevity and specificity?

By OrangeTide • • Score: 4, Funny • Thread

I always check the weather report. No need to wear your nanotech except on days with nerve gas.

Gear preserves “Ability Ti Survive and Operate”

By couchslug • • Score: 3 • Thread

Chems are horrid but one can dress for them.

Nerve agent like other war gases degrades opponents by forcing them to wear CBRN ensembles which are miserable to work and fight in. (Gas is so nasty not even Hitler used it in combat because he’d personal experience in WWI.)

Modern CBRN suits are (barely) breathable because they can filter contaminants. Suits which even partly neutralize nerve agent would not just save lives but reduce misery. Gases are frequently inefficient even when used on undefended targets like Saddam Hussein’s bombing of Halabja (which took multiple sorties to execute).

A chem suit fabric that can neutralize contamination could save lives and usefully decrease exposure. Chems don’t magically wipe out everyone exposed. The 1995 Tokyo subway attack affected several thousand people while only causing ~14 direct fatalities among a concentrated, defenseless group. Neutralizing fabric would be very useful against highly diluted agents.

M13 Individual Decontaminating Kit

By jfdavis668 • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread
When I first joined the Army, we were still issued the M13 Individual Decontaminating and Re-Impregnating Kit. A few bags of powder you would use on your equipment and clothing to decontaminate yourself. Always freaked us out that we would have to us it after we were contaminated. MOPP gear came later and was much better protection. M13 - https://gasmaskandrespirator.f…

The Night Sky Is Getting 10% Brighter Every Year

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
fjo3 quotes a report from The Guardian, written by Tove Danovich:
Every year, the night sky is becoming 10% brighter. Eighty percent of people live under light-polluted skies. And while the UN declared a healthy environment — clean air, clean water — to be a human right, I believe we also all have a right to darkness as well. This doesn’t mean turning off every streetlamp. But do we really need bright white floodlights at the front of every garage? Replacing lights with ones that are bright enough to do the job — and no brighter — might make it so I wouldn’t have to get in my car and drive for hours to see the night sky as it actually shines above us. To preserve the darkness would mean rules and enforcement around the warmth of the lights, where they point, and how bright they can be. It would mean not putting in three lights when one would do. If we recognized that darkness is something we need, we’d become more careful about chasing it away.

[…] Access to darkness is about more than stargazing. The night is its own habitat. Artificial lights confuse animals who use the moon to navigate, whether they’re baby sea turtles navigating toward a parking lot instead of the ocean or moths who fly in circles around a lightbulb. Lightning bugs and frogs need darkness to complete their courtship rituals. Migrating birds get thrown off course by the bright lights of big cities. But the effects of light pollution linger even after it’s daylight again, becoming visible. Research has shown light pollution is breaking the relationship between plants and pollinators, changing the time of year trees break into flower, and disrupting circadian rhythms for all living creatures. This includes humans. Whether it’s artificial lights indoors or creeping in through the window at night, studies have found that we need darkness in order to rest, recover and stay healthy.

Where i live…

By Viol8 • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

… in the UK the council replaced sodium street lamps with allegedly more energy efficient white LED lights and in the process turned the fairly dim but usable orange sodium glow into virtual daylight all night. We used to be able to sleep with the curtains open but not now.

Crime

By quintessencesluglord • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

or paranoia, take your pick, but if it is a question of stargazing or crime, crime will win out. Always.

Re:Where i live…

By thegarbz • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

allegedly more energy efficient

Way to go telling everyone not to take anything you say seriously. If you can’t even admit the basic fact of energy efficiency of one of the most efficient light source humans ever developed, why should anyone bother reading past this part of your post. If you had a point to make you lost a lot of readers before they got to it.

Re:Where i live…

By Rei • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread

The funny thing is there’s not that much difference in the raw bulb efficiencies - LPS is slightly lower, but not dramatically. But LPS have more fixture losses (the bulbs are omnidirectional), ballast losses, inefficient dimming (and only to slight degrees) for morning/evening, and so on. LED’s high CRI (vs. LPS’s virtually nonexistent CRI) can sometimes mean you can use less light, too. In practice, you can use something like 30-40% the electricity with LED streetlamps as with LPS, despite the raw bulb figures not being very different.

But no question that LED is much worse for astronomy. LPS was almost a pure spectral line, very easy to exclude. White LEDs use phosphors and deliver a broad spectrum white (apart from the source’s blue peak). Pretty much the worst spectrum you could have apart from incandescent. : It kind of sucks that we have to use phosphors in the first place, as they’re wasteful - but unfortunately, LEDs have a “green gap”; in the green spectrum, existing tech has a dramatic drop in output and efficiency (and corresponding increase in price) - while green is what our eyes see best. There’s still ongoing work to fill it, but it’s been a slog. If we could skip the phosphor and just have a mix of different coloured LEDs, the fixtures would be even more efficient, and it would be much easier for astronomers to filter (esp. if the frequencies were standardized)

Re:Where i live…

By AmiMoJo • • Score: 4, Informative • Thread

It was a decision that weighed up the pros and cons.

Pros:
- Broader spectrum light has better colour rendering, i.e. you can see things like road markings and hazards better with it. Sodium is very narrow spectrum.
- CCTV can see a lot better with broad spectrum.
- Whiter light appears brighter to humans even when the light output is lower than redder light.
- LEDs are more efficient at higher colour temperatures, although the difference is small now.

Cons:
- Can mess up the natural day/night cycle for living things, from insects to humans.
- Some people prefer orange.

If it is bothering you then contact your council. They can install a shield that stops it shining into your bedroom.

Tech Workers Made ChatGPT Drive a Toyota Corolla

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from 404 Media:
Some tech workers in San Francisco hooked up ChatGPT to a Toyota Corolla and got it to drive around a parking lot. This may not sound impressive in the age of the self-driving car until you realize that the LLM driving the car was a general purpose chatbot running on a laptop and not the purpose-built driving system based on millions of hours of training data used by Waymo or Tesla.

The people behind the stunt call themselves DrivingBench and they’ve posted their code, their prompts, and videos of the experiment online. In the experiment, DrivingBench hooked up GPT-6 Astra, Claude Fable 5.1, Grok 4.6, and GPT-5.6 Sol to a Toyota Corolla and gave the LLMs control over the car’s steering, accelerator, and brakes. Then they set up a small cone course in a public parking lot and prompted the chatbots to navigate the space.

The goal, they said, was to find out if untrained, off-the-shelf frontier AIs can drive a real car. The results were mixed. Grok, Sol, and Fable only drove a few meters and didn’t finish the course. GPT-6 Astra, however, did eventually learn to navigate the course and complete it. But not without a lot of troubleshooting.
“It’s an interesting demonstration of potential emergent capabilities,” said Mahns. “It can fail a turn, and then the next turn, next try, it will be able to do that turn and other turns that it hasn’t seen before. Not necessarily saying LLMs are gonna put Waymo out of business or something, just an interesting demonstration of where things are, and things are just moving fast.”
“Most people that are familiar with ChatGPT have used it in this white collar, kind of like in the computer, and it’s definitely imminent to the point that this capability will start having more impact in the physical world. So I think seeing the sparks of this happening, the shift of this utility coming into the physical world, is also somewhat exciting.”

inputs and outputs

By phantomfive • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread
They had the LLM steer the car using a kind of programming language, with function calls that look like this:

set_motion(right, 60 %, 1.5 m/s, 10 s)

They translated those functions into input for some aftermarket car controlling hardware, which looks kind of cool but I didn’t know was a thing.

I couldn’t figure out from their report how they returned data back to the LLM, but apparently they pasted images and telemetry into the chat window every so often, or something like that.

I look forward to their next ChatGPT experiment

By Required Snark • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread
ChatGPT driven human surgery preformed on themselves or a family member.

It’s fine if you do it in a parking lot. It will be easy to hose off afterwards.

Re:inputs and outputs

By Waffle Iron • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

Probably the next code that it outputs will be:

# You’re out of uploads for today, so if you want me to stop this vehicle anytime soon, upgrade your plan now!

Talk about really bad ideas

By gweihir • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

The last thing you want to control dangerous machinery is a control system with a tendency to hallucinate.

Re:Oh my, what to say

By GoTeam • • Score: 4, Funny • Thread

If that’s not the absolute worst idea in the world, it’s certainly in the running.

Maybe their next test will be to give it a shotgun and see how good it is at duck hunting…

Firefox Redesign Brings Round Tabs, New Themes, and Compact Mode

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Firefox 157 is rolling out a major redesign across desktop and mobile, bringing rounded “bubble” tabs, a curved address bar, refreshed icons and colors, and a more consistent visual language across devices. Mozilla is also adding more themes and wallpapers while bringing back Compact Mode, which the company says “reduces the size of your tabs and toolbar to give more of your screen to the web, with an auto-compact option for smaller screens.” The Verge reports:
According to Mozilla, the design changes will have “no cost to your browser performance.” Mozilla says the overhauled design is a “renewal” for Firefox, following major updates over the last year, like homepage widgets, Split View, a built-in VPN, and controls for disabling the browser’s AI features.

Rounded tabs?

By drinkypoo • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

These clowns keep finding new ways to waste screen real estate.

Re: Rounded tabs?

By markdavis • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

>“Can you turn it back to rectangular tabs in tool/settings”

I doubt that. And themes only change colors and backgrounds.

But you can make actual changes with Userchrome. It takes a bit of effort, though. I have my tabs square and always outlined and against the content, in a traditional way, using it.

https://www.userchrome.org/
https://github.com/Aris-t2/Cus…

Too many UX designers with nothing to do

By khchung • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

so they keep making UI changes for the sake of doing something to justify their existence.

They wasted testing efforts on UI changes that could have used for fixing bugs and improving performance instead. This is an organisational problem of having the wrong talent mix in the team, and management that lacks vision and sense of responsibility to make corrections.

Re:More than a mere Mozilla employee.

By Valgrus Thunderaxe • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread
He was Marc Andreessen’s roommate at Urbana-Champaign. They founded a little company called Netscape and Eich created Javascript.

Re: Rounded tabs?

By AmiMoJo • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

Go to about:config and toggle browser.nova.enabled to false.

I read the Ars interview with one of the guys who worked on this, and he justified it by saying that for broad appeal they need to have a modern looking UI. That may be true, but only if they also have a strong base of speed and compatibility.

He mentioned that they are using AI to help develop things faster, which may be good if it helps catch back up for speed and compatibility. I think what they really need to do is straighten the codebase out and make it easier to build, so that other browsers can adopt it like they have adopted Chromium. I know there are forks, but they are little more than skins and default settings changes.

Microsoft Makes Linux Containers Native On Windows 11

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
BrianFagioli shares a report from NERDS.xyz:
Microsoft has made WSL Containers generally available, giving Windows 11 developers a built-in way to build, run, and deploy Linux containers through Windows Subsystem for Linux. The release includes wslc.exe for managing containers, GPU support, networking improvements, health checks, storage mounts, and integration with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint and Intune. Microsoft also claims up to twice the performance when Linux environments access files stored on Windows.

Docker Desktop, Podman Desktop, and Rancher Desktop are not going anywhere, but developers who only need basic container functionality now have another option built around WSL. One notable feature is still missing: Compose support. Microsoft says adding it is now a priority.

Oh How the Mighty Have Fallen

By hutkept • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread
It took Microsoft 25 years to go from "[Linux] is a cancer that attaches itself in an intellectual property sense to everything it touches” to running it natively in Windows.

Re: Oh How the Mighty Have Fallen

By drinkypoo • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

And it only took Windows 11 to make lots of people not want to do that any more, and only run Windows in a VM… Like any spyware.

Re: Oh How the Mighty Have Fallen

By tannhaus • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

That’s what a lot of the linux fanbase seems to think, but if you look at the numbers, Windows 11 has been a success for the company. It reached 1 billion users quicker than Windows 10 did. People hate change, but they do eventually come around. It even dominates among gamers according to the Steam Hardware Survey. Anecdotal evidence of what some guy may have told you when you were talking about linux or what some people in a forum said doesn’t translate to real world numbers.

Re: Oh How the Mighty Have Fallen

By Djdatlondon • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
By force mainly. Most average joes have no idea how to stop it from auto updating. I guarantee this is where these numbers are coming from.

Re: Oh How the Mighty Have Fallen

By Vomitgod • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

You can still get updates for Windows 10, via the Windows 10 Consumer Extended Security Updates (ESU), till the 12th of October, 2027.
https://www.microsoft.com/en-u…

Mistral CEO Says US AI Safety Debate Masks Competitors’ ‘Negligence’

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from CNBC:
Mistral Chief Executive Arthur Mensch has accused leading global artificial intelligence companies of using the debate over the safety of the technology as a cover-up for their “negligence.” “The debate that we’ve seen in the U.S. has been a cover for the negligence of some of our competitors,” Mensch told CNBC’s Annette Weisbach, adding that it was necessary to make systems that can contain the AI agents. […]

“When you give them a lot of tools, those systems [AI agents] are very dynamic, so they can go and do things that you do not expect,” Mensch told CNBC. “You need to have the right monitoring in place, and the enterprises we work with, we give them those kind of monitoring systems,” he said.

Mistral also develops AI models but takes a different approach to OpenAI and Anthropic by working with individual companies to create custom AI tools to suit their needs and integrate them with their businesses. But unlike its competitors, Mistral has no plans to slow down development of advanced models. The lead that U.S. labs have is “not extremely large,” Mensch said, adding that his company was confident that its next-generation model will close the gap “very significantly.”

“We have been raising the capital needed to scale the compute that we need to train bigger and more powerful models, in order for us to own our own destiny,” he said. Earlier this month, Mistral raised 3 billion euros ($3.5 billion) in fresh funding led by memory chip giant Samsung, as it looks to position itself as a European alternative to rivals like OpenAI and Anthropic.

wrong focus

By zlives • • Score: 3 • Thread

Mistral is focused on a good = end product and not just getting rich, will never work

Nobody understands how AIs work :o

By Mirnotoriety • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
Tracing the thoughts of a large language model

“Language models like Claude aren’t programmed directly by humans—instead, they‘re trained on large amounts of data. During that training process, they learn their own strategies to solve problems.”

“These strategies are encoded in the billions of computations a model performs for every word it writes. They arrive inscrutable to us, the model’s developers. This means that we don’t understand how models do most of the things they do.”

Masks?

By fahrbot-bot • • Score: 3 • Thread

US AI Safety Debate Masks Competitors’ ‘Negligence’

Perhaps this is more about deflection.

Also, the recent related SNL Weekend Update skit was pretty entertaining, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei on AI’s Threat to Humanity, “We do not condone what we are doing.”

AI companies must be liable for their “agents”

By atrimtab • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

So the corporations that release them and the end-users must be liable for the crimes they commit.

OpenAI used a model containing “hacking techniques” and prompted it’s AI to swarm and win. The AI did not go rogue. Instead, it did exactly as instructed via prompt and previous training.

If you have a dangerous dog and your dog kills a child. You go to trial and likely jail because it’s your dog and you did not control it. And now if you give your teenager a destructive deadly weapon and they commit a crime you as the adult are going to be held responsible in more and more jurisdictions.

OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, etc. should be put on trial for creating “agents” committing felony computer trespass.

AIs just do what they are told via prompt and model training. And who was the party who that? Yes, the AI company.

BTW, I notice that there some group using a “sweeping system” lowering the score on Slashdot comments questioning AI LLMs after the initial attention has passed. You can get a 5 score that can end up -1. So future users will likely never find it. If you post, check your postings.

Re: Nobody understands how AIs work :o

By dfghjk • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread

They won’t be able to improve it because they don’t know what “improve” means.

Current AI development is about scaling up, it is no longer about modeling and emulating the mind. AI companies do not care one bit about developing what laypeople would consider “improvements”, they only care about getting rich by getting “there” first. Who cares how many die, that’s your problem.

I also think it’s naive to say that AI researchers “don’t know” how modern AI, i.e. transformer models, work. They know, it’s just impossible to predict results given the immense size of the models. What they don’t know, because they don’t care, is why models generate such catastrophic results at times. Once upon a time, AI research would consider this their highest priority, not anymore.

And you can’t separate the models from the applications that use and direct the models. That’s where the shit really starts to stink. Remember that when part of the prompt reads "…make sure to kill mostly brown ones”. Hyperbolics aside, actions that would result in criminal and civil penalties if done by humans will be fair game for AI, a fact executive management and billionaires are eager to exploit.

McDonald’s Reportedly Using AI to ‘Dynamically’ Price Its Burgers

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
McDonald’s is reportedly using AI-powered pricing tools to recommend menu prices based on what customers near individual restaurants are willing to pay. Franchisees technically retain control over final prices, but some told Reuters they feel pressured to follow the algorithm’s recommendations. “A corporate document reviewed by the publication shows that McDonald’s tracks adherence to the platform, and notes any deviations from the algorithm’s price recommendations,” reports Engadget. From the report:
Reuters got a look at the interface that franchisees use to access this technology and it’s pretty creepy. Messages show stuff like “your restaurant is showing MEDIUM SENSITIVITY to price” based on “customer willingness to pay in your area.” Cost differences at nearby locations can be stark. Researchers found that a Big Mac at a Fresno, California store cost $5.69, but the same burger cost $6.89 at another branch two miles down the road. That’s a 21 percent difference.

The company acknowledges that using this dynamic pricing system could open up franchisees to legal hurdles, all while continuing to push the platform. The pricing portal’s terms of service reportedly warns that owners “may be competitors of each other” and “it is particularly important for all Users of the Tool to understand and comply fully with antitrust and competition laws.” The document also reiterates that franchisees are “always free to determine the final price,” thus potentially absolving corporate from any antitrust concerns.

McDonald’s has decried Reuters’ reporting as “speculative and uninformed.” The company says the pricing portal is “a tool, not a mandate, designed to provide restaurant-specific recommendations to help franchisees deliver value for customers and make informed business decisions.” The company has been using some version of this technology since at least 2019, according to Reuters. In 2023, however, CEO Kempczinski boasted to investors that it had developed proprietary tools to evaluate pricing at individual restaurants.

Nothing changes

By ukoda • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread
Just another reasons not to eat McDonald’s, not that I needed one.

Re:Don’t eat this crap

By fropenn • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

They’re a horrible company and nobody should be eating meat anyhow.

Let me know when McDonald’s starts serving meat.

Re:So what?

By fropenn • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Why is this a problem? A guy could be selling watermelons out of the back of his truck for $5, another one a few streets over is selling them for $4, and no one bats an eye.

Because it is price-fixing via an app.

You are correct that the way it is supposed to work is that competing businesses compete by offering differing prices for their products or services, then customers are free to choose the price they are willing to pay. But this ain’t that.

This is McDonald’s (and soon every other restaurant) conspiring together to set the price as high as they want so every restaurant everywhere has the same high price - customers are no longer free to choose because all prices are the same everywhere. And extremely high.

Value?

By guygo • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

“help franchisees deliver value for customers ". Please explain sir, just what “value” does the customer receive by being charged extra? Sheesh.
More corporate-speak BS.

F that nonsense…

By ak3ldama • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread
I want to share my little perspective. I worked at a McDonalds about 26 years ago. For several years while in high school and a bit in college. It was near the Interstate, in Mitchell South Dakota. This means we were quite busy, quite a bit of the time. If a bus came through, and they certainly did, one of if not the most likely place it would stop is there. We were paid near eight dollars an hour which inflation adjusted is probably the same now. As a high schooler, we worked pretty hard. There were two or three kids faster than me but I certainly held my own. And I took personal pride in assembling a nice, neat burger, and not smashing it all to hell wrapping it up. When I go to most fast food restaurants now, its shocking how slower they are. In the years I worked there I saw the “quality” and freshness of food slip every year. The eggs not cracked and mixed, more things pre cooked, etc. We certainly didn’t play pricing games then either so if you were busy, you just buckled down and got the food out as quick as you could. The best part is it taught me to do dishes and not grumble. Cooking got easier, and now I’m happy to rarely eat out. I go to a bbq joint, or whatever and almost always think to myself that this could’ve been better if we made it at home. Anyways, learn to cook. Make your own baked beans, bread, lamb burgers, whatever. It is worth the time and effort to learn. And get a smoker and a charcoal grill if you can. I’m still glad I had that experience; they were mostly all good people. But it certainly should’ve paid better.

500K Facial Recognition Scans at UK Stations Yield Zero Arrests, One False Positive

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot
A six-month British Transport Police trial of live facial recognition at London railway stations scanned more than 500,000 faces, cost over 320,000 pounds, and produced just one alert with no arrests directly resulting from the technology. That one alert ended up being a false positive.

Despite those results, BTP has extended the pilot through November and expanded it to selected Underground stations. The Guardian reports:
British Transport Police said that since the extension there had been three positive confirmed alerts of people who were subsequently confirmed to be complying with sexual harm prevention orders or other imposed court conditions. When Transport for London announced its support for the extension of the trial, it said LFR technology “will target and identify people on police watchlists at key stations chosen for maximum impact” and would “specifically tackle violence against women and girls, whose travel behaviors are shaped by experiences of sexual harassment and sexual offenses.”

Fraser Sampson, a former biometrics and surveillance camera commissioner for the UK, said the police needed to show that the use of the technology was proportionate. “There many variables and all need to align: the choice of location, times of day, make up of the watchlist and likelihood of people being present and many more.” Sampson, who is now a non-executive director of Facewatch, a company that operates facial recognition systems in shops, added: “We know the technology works, but using it in supermarkets to deter shoplifters and prevent attacks on staff is very different from deploying it to catch people on a public transport network.”

“Success in a shop means no such people coming in. Success for the police trying to catch people means people being caught. In that respect the trial doesn’t appear to have been very fruitful. Everything depends on the police watchlists; if you’re not on a watchlist, the live FRT cameras do not “see” you and they don’t retain your image in the same way as CCTV cameras. However, they are processing special category personal data and the technology must be used in a way that is appropriate, proportionate and necessary. It’s for the police to show how any deployment meets those criteria and — as the ICO [information commissioner’s office] has recently reported — for their oversight boards to hold them firmly to account in doing so.”

The scientific method

By CommunityMember • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
A trail failing is actually a success. Let’s see if the politicians and the police learn the actual lesson from the failure (I am not personally going to hold my breath for the learning).

For now, that is…

By jenningsthecat • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

… if you’re not on a watchlist, the live FRT cameras do not “see” you and they don’t retain your image in the same way as CCTV cameras.

This whole thing strikes me as one of those “bargains” likely to be altered, with a “pray I don’t alter it further” thrown in for bad measure.

Re:The point isn’t for arrests

By houstonbofh • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
Yep. Crime prevention is the excuse, not the reason.

Re:The scientific method

By ozzymodus12 • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread
It’s a brave new world of endless incompetence.

Sailing close to the wind

By hadleyburg • • Score: 3 • Thread

The UK has a cultural sensitivity about having a right to privacy. But I think we make a mistake by considering the rules in this area some sort of a fixed “red line”, rather than a spectrum.

The law, by nature tends to set “red lines”, so that we can rule that this case was illegal, while that case was legal”. But with an issue like privacy, the reality is that there is not a clear red line as such. As privacy is gradually encroached upon, we feel increasingly worse about it.

Having an army of cameras automatically detecting people who look like those on watchlists, and being used in a “proportionate” manner, might be legal, but it certainly sails close to the wind.