Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Startup Wants To Launch a Space Mirror
  2. European Consortium Wants Open-Source Alternative To Google Play Integrity
  3. Samsung Wants To Let You Vibe Code Your Galaxy Phone Experience
  4. EA Lays Off Staff Across All Battlefield Studios Following Record-Breaking Battlefield 6 Launch
  5. Live Nation Avoids Ticketmaster Breakup By ‘Open Sourcing’ Their Ticketing Model
  6. How AI Assistants Are Moving the Security Goalposts
  7. Bluesky CEO Jay Graber Is Stepping Down
  8. Qualcomm’s New Arduino Ventuno Q Is an AI-Focused Computer Designed For Robotics
  9. Anthropic Sues the Pentagon After Being Labeled a Threat To National Security
  10. ‘If Lockheed Martin Made a Game Boy, Would You Buy One?’
  11. AI Allows Hackers To Identify Anonymous Social Media Accounts, Study Finds
  12. Swiss Vote Places Right To Use Cash In Country’s Constitution
  13. US Military Tested Device That May Be Tied To Havana Syndrome On Rats, Sheep
  14. New SETI Study: Why We Might Have Been Missing Alien Signals
  15. EFF, Ubuntu and Other Distros Discuss How to Respond to Age-Verification Laws

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Startup Wants To Launch a Space Mirror

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
A startup called Reflect Orbital wants to launch thousands of mirror-bearing satellites to reflect sunlight onto Earth at night and “power solar farms after sunset, provide lighting for rescue workers and illuminate city streets, among other things,” reports the New York Times. From the report:
It is an idea seemingly out of a sci-fi movie, but the company, Reflect Orbital of Hawthorne, Calif., could soon receive permission to launch its first prototype satellite with a 60-foot-wide mirror. The company has applied to the Federal Communications Commission, which issues the licenses needed to deploy satellites. If the F.C.C. approves, the test satellite could get a ride into orbit as soon as this summer. The F.C.C.‘s public comment period on the application closes on Monday. “We’re trying to build something that could replace fossil fuels and really power everything,” Ben Nowack, Reflect Orbital’s chief executive, said in an interview. The company has raised more than $28 million from investors.

[…] Reflect Orbital’s first prototype, which will be roughly the size of a dorm fridge, is almost complete. Once in space, about 400 miles up, the test satellite would unfurl a square mirror nearly 60 feet wide. That would bounce sunlight to illuminate a circular patch about three miles wide on the Earth’s surface. Someone looking up would see a dot in the sky about as bright as a full moon. Two more prototypes could follow within a year. By the end of 2028, Reflect Orbital hopes to launch 1,000 larger satellites, and 5,000 of them by 2030. The largest mirrors are planned to be nearly 180 feet wide, reflecting as much light as 100 full moons. The company said its goal was to deploy the full constellation of 50,000 satellites by 2035.

How much does it cost to order sunlight at night? Mr. Nowack said the company would charge about $5,000 an hour for the light of one mirror if a customer signed an annual contract for 1,000 hours or more. Lighting for one-time events and emergencies, which might require numerous satellites and more effort to coordinate, would be more expensive. For solar farms, he envisions splitting revenue from the electricity generated by the additional hours of light.

This is DEFINITLY happening this summer!

By Morromist • Score: 3 Thread

I wonder what % of times it actually comes true when people say they’re going to do ___ thing in space. 1%? .1%? .01%?
Probably less.

Sounds like a great idea

By mick232 • Score: 3 Thread
The planet isn’t warm enough yet.

Ladies and gentlemen

By sinkskinkshrieks • Score: 3 Thread
I have placed in orbit a giant mirror that will reflect 40% of the Sun’s rays, thus cooling Earth. Observe.

A non-paywalled link

By thephydes • Score: 4, Informative Thread
At Gadget Review https://www.gadgetreview.com/s…

European Consortium Wants Open-Source Alternative To Google Play Integrity

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Heise:
Pay securely with an Android smartphone, completely without Google services: This is the plan being developed by the newly founded industry consortium led by the German Volla Systeme GmbH. It is an open-source alternative to Google Play Integrity. This proprietary interface decides on Android smartphones with Google Play services whether banking, government, or wallet apps are allowed to run on a smartphone.

Obstacles and tips for paying with an Android smartphone without official Google services have been highlighted by c’t in a comprehensive article. The European industry consortium now wants to address some problems mentioned. To this end, the group, which includes Murena, which develops the hardened custom ROM /e/OS, Iode from France, and Apostrophy (Dot) from Switzerland, in addition to Volla, is developing a so-called "UnifiedAttestation" for Google-free mobile operating systems, primarily based on the Android Open-Source Project (AOSP).

According to Volla, a European manufacturer and a leading manufacturer from Asia, as well as European foundations such as the German UBports Foundation, have also expressed interest in supporting it. Furthermore, developers and publishers of government apps from Scandinavia are examining the use of the new procedure as “first movers.” In its announcement, Volla explains that Google provides app developers with an interface called Play Integrity, which checks whether an app is running on a device with specific security requirements. This primarily affects applications from “sensitive areas such as identity verification, banking, or digital wallets — including apps from governments and public administrations”.

The company criticizes that the certification is exclusively offered for Google’s own proprietary “Stock Android” but not for Android versions without Google services, such as /e/OS or similar custom ROMs. “Since this is closely intertwined with Google services and Google data centers, a structural dependency arises — and for alternative operating systems, a de facto exclusion criterion,” the company states. From the consortium’s perspective, this also leads to a “security paradox,” because “the check of trustworthiness is carried out by precisely that entity whose ecosystem is to be avoided at the same time”.
The UnifiedAttestation system is built around three main components: an “operating system service” that apps can call to check whether the device’s OS meets required security standards, a decentralized validation service that verifies the OS certificate on a device without relying on a single central authority, and an open test suite used to evaluate and certify that a particular operating system works securely on a specific device model.
“We don’t want to centralize trust, but organize it transparently and publicly verifiable. When companies check competitors’ products, we can strengthen that trust,” says Dr. Jorg Wurzer, CEO of Volla Systeme GmbH and initiator of the consortium. The goal is to increase digital sovereignty and break free from the control of any one, single U.S. company, he says.

If you’re an EU citizen

By Mr. Dollar Ton • Score: 5, Informative Thread

write to your representatives, the convenient list of everyone who can do something about it is here:

https://keepandroidopen.org/

There are also appropriate links with contacts for many other jurisdictions that are important to google.

Samsung Wants To Let You Vibe Code Your Galaxy Phone Experience

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Samsung says it’s thinking about bringing “vibe coding” to future Galaxy phones, allowing users to describe apps or interface changes in plain language and have AI generate the code. TechRadar interviewed Won-Joon Choi, Samsung’s head of mobile experience, to learn more about the plans. Here’s an excerpt from their report:
As noted by Won-Joon Choi, the usefulness of vibe coding on smartphones is that it opens up the “possibility of customizing your smartphone experience in new ways, not just your apps but your UX.” He added, “Right now we’re limited to premade tools, but with vibe coding, users could adjust their favorite apps or make something customized to their needs. So vibe coding is very interesting, and something we’re looking into.” […]

Samsung recently debuted the Galaxy S26 series of phones and made a point to not call them smartphones — they’re “AI phones” now. This certainly rang true with the majority of upgrades to the devices being AI software-focused, like the new Now Nudge and expanded Audio Eraser tools, with the biggest hardware bump for the base models coming via the 39% improved NPU processing (the processor in charge of on-device AI tasks). It also teased the debut of Perplexity on its phones, joining as an alternative to the Gemini assistant, and teased the possibility of other AI models getting the same treatment in the future.

Bloat

By dohzer • Score: 3 Thread

Can I vibe-uninstall all the normal Samsung bloatware? I’m not returning to Samsung until they give me a clean Android experience.

EA Lays Off Staff Across All Battlefield Studios Following Record-Breaking Battlefield 6 Launch

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Electronic Arts has laid off staff across multiple Battlefield studios despite Battlefield 6 being the best-selling game in the U.S. in 2025 and the “biggest launch in franchise history.” According to IGN, the layoffs include workers at Criterion, Dice, Ripple Effect, and Motive Studios. From the report:
Individuals are being informed that the layoffs are taking place as part of a “realignment” across the Battlefield studios, as the team continues its ongoing, live service support for Battlefield 6 following launch. All four studios will remain operational, though the layoffs seem to be impacting a variety of teams across multiple studios and offices.

IGN asked EA for comment on total number and types of roles impacted, as well as for the specific reasons for the layoffs. An EA spokesperson told IGN: “We’ve made select changes within our Battlefield organization to better align our teams around what matters most to our community. Battlefield remains one of our biggest priorities, and we’re continuing to invest in the franchise, guided by player feedback and insights from Battlefield Labs.”

They served their purpose…

By ZombieCatInABox • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

… so now their salaries are just a liability for the company. Remember folks: In the corporate world, employees are not people. They are “human resources”. Just another column in a spreadsheet.

Corporations have no heart, no soul. And that’s exactly how shareholders want them to be.

At the end of every project

By Wolfling1 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
The best devs move on of their own accord.

Its the less desirable employees who have to be moved on.

Anyone who works for a game company needs an attitude adjustment if they think they’re going to be there for more than one project.

Re:EA and their ilk churn through their devs

By dysmal • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

It’s not just EA or even IBM that churns through people like this. I can name a half dozen companies in my city that do the same. Every year there’s another crop of new recruits fresh out of college (fresh meat for the grinder!) that sign on with these companies despite their reviews on glassdoor and word of mouth. Every couple of months there’s a purge and of course there are people crying that they didn’t see this coming.

On some level I can’t blame the companies that do this because as long as they can hoover up a bunch of warm bodies to restock their shelves, they won’t change their company culture. The applicants are validating this toxic behavior.

The solution is simple: vote with your dollars and reward companies that aren’t toxic. EA is a company that provides an an entertainment product which is even easier to avoid if you have shred of self control.

Re:EA and their ilk churn through their devs

By rta • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

EA is perfectly fine to burn through their developers like this - there are plenty of people who still think it’s “prestigious” or desirable to work for a games company, and especially one that is “successful” enough that people would be clamouring for the opportunity. The absolute churn I see with these companies is insane.

This. The game industry has been like this for decades. It made a bit more sense when games were released on a CD and then not really updated compared to live service games, but still it was more akin to making a movie than a continually revving software product.

One thing that movie production employees got right in retrospect that games devs (and maybe other devs) haven’t is that Hollywood is unionized. I’m still not quite pro union / guild… but that my be me just not wanting to admit the truth.

After some decades in software (only a few of those in games, mostly “enterprise” and saas) i wouldn’t mind not having to argue with “idiot” managers entirely on my own. (though i say this even for cases where i’m a mid-level manager arguing with peers or execs so… )

Also i’ll point out that lawyers have the bar as their guild. Doctors have the AMA and their whole licensing protection racket. Airline pilots all have unions. Professors have unions (and the whole tenure system). As SW engineers, managers etc. are we so smart to eschew all that ? i’m starting to wonder…
(though otoh one things those professions have in common is that they’re not as easy to outsource. On the other hand compare merchant mariners… All ships are owned by and manned w/ developing world people entirely to bypass US labor laws so…

OT third hand, corporations have already done their best to outsource everything that’s outsource-able to the point of diminishing returns so… would it be anything worse? )

Lame AF

By sizzlinkitty • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

I recently bought the game and played a little. My last battlefield was over a decade ago, battlefield1 and 2042 sucked in my honest opinion, I can’t support all of the WW1 and WW2 remakes, and the premise of 2042 jumped the shark long before the game was released. That said, I have about 20 hours into BF6 and the level of shilling for battle pass and to sell skins makes me sick. What ever happened to paying $80 dollars for a game being enough to provide the consumer with all the things and not try to nickel and dime them. This is not normal and we shouldn’t accept it…

Live Nation Avoids Ticketmaster Breakup By ‘Open Sourcing’ Their Ticketing Model

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Live Nation reached a settlement with the U.S. Department of Justice that avoids breaking up its dominant live events empire with Ticketmaster. Instead, the deal requires changes like “open sourcing” their ticketing model and divesting some venues. NBC News reports:
The company and the Justice Department reached a settlement on Monday, following a week of testimony during an antitrust trial that threatened to potentially separate the world’s largest live entertainment company. […] On a background call with reporters Monday, a senior justice official said the deal will drive down prices by giving both artists and consumers more choice.

As part of the agreement, Ticketmaster will provide a standalone ticketing system that will allow third-party companies like SeatGeek and StubHub to offer primary tickets through the platform. The senior justice official described it as “open sourcing” their ticketing model. The company will also divest up to 13 amphitheaters and reserve 50% of tickets for nonexclusive venues. Ticketmaster is also prohibited from retaliating against a venue that selects another primary ticket distributor, among other requirements. Although a group of states have joined the DOJ in signing the agreement, other states can continue to press their own claims.

“Open Source”

By HotNeedleOfInquiry • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
You keep using that word. I don’t think it means what you think it means.

Re:Wow

By bill_mcgonigle • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Not really.

Gail Slater was the Antitrust Director at DoJ and she got shitcanned a few weeks ago because she was actually going to anti-trust Ticketmaster. The Lobbyists got that “problem solved”.

Yes, it’s as corrupt as you can imagine.

(reportedly/allegedly/etc)

settlement with air quotes

By SirSlud • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Neither side apparently said anything about the agreement in court on Friday, which Judge Arun Subramanian said today was âoeabsolutely unacceptable.â âoeIt shows absolute disrespect for the court, the jury and this entire process,â he said.

With this admin, nobody should be surprised. Corruption is standard operating procedure.

This is why people sued Ticketmaster

By Zontar_Thing_From_Ve • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Two years ago, somebody I went to high school with posted on Facebook trying desperately to sell some concert tickets the day before a show. Her husband got sick and they tried to dump the tickets. To the best of my knowledge, they didn’t sell the tickets because she was trying to get full value. I made a screenshot of her post showing the cost of the tickets. I’m not going to name the band because if I did, people would post “I didn’t know they were still around” or “I can’t believe they paid that much to see them”. Here are the details.

Venue seats 10,000 to 12,000. Located in a town with over 100,000 residents, so not a major metro area.
Seats located roughly 20 rows from the stage.
Cost of 2 tickets:
Tickets: $398.00. (2 x $199.00)
Service Fee: $117.42. ($58.71 per ticket - that’s 29.5% of the cost of the tickets with no explanation as to what it’s for)
Delivery Fee: $9.95 (These are mobile tickets so that’s a fee for sending it via email/text)
Taxes: $42.03
Total: $567.40. or $283.70 per ticket.
I will give you a hint - The group’s last top 40 US single was in 1977.

Weak Sauce

By edi_guy • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

The situation is still super broken. Labelling any part of this Open Source means the “senior justice official” is either ignorant or intentionally misleading. Just plain wrong.

Look, there is overwhelming demand for many of these events. The question is do we (as a society of consumers) want to allow shows to become financial trading instruments like so many other things in our lives, or put into place mechanisms to remove the incentive associated with scalping and secondary ticket markets. IMHO this could be done with cooperation of artists and then ticketing mechanisms. But of course Ticketmaster, et al are more than happy to keep the up-bidding going so that they can get their XX% of whatever the overbid price becomes. Tay-Tay isn’t getting any of that overbid money so artists like her should be onboard.

How AI Assistants Are Moving the Security Goalposts

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from KrebsOnSecurity:
AI-based assistants or “agents” — autonomous programs that have access to the user’s computer, files, online services and can automate virtually any task — are growing in popularity with developers and IT workers. But as so many eyebrow-raising headlines over the past few weeks have shown, these powerful and assertive new tools are rapidly shifting the security priorities for organizations, while blurring the lines between data and code, trusted co-worker and insider threat, ninja hacker and novice code jockey.

The new hotness in AI-based assistants — OpenClaw (formerly known as ClawdBot and Moltbot) — has seen rapid adoption since its release in November 2025. OpenClaw is an open-source autonomous AI agent designed to run locally on your computer and proactively take actions on your behalf without needing to be prompted. If that sounds like a risky proposition or a dare, consider that OpenClaw is most useful when it has complete access to your entire digital life, where it can then manage your inbox and calendar, execute programs and tools, browse the Internet for information, and integrate with chat apps like Discord, Signal, Teams or WhatsApp.

Other more established AI assistants like Anthropic’s Claude and Microsoft’s Copilot also can do these things, but OpenClaw isn’t just a passive digital butler waiting for commands. Rather, it’s designed to take the initiative on your behalf based on what it knows about your life and its understanding of what you want done. “The testimonials are remarkable,” the AI security firm Snyk observed. “Developers building websites from their phones while putting babies to sleep; users running entire companies through a lobster-themed AI; engineers who’ve set up autonomous code loops that fix tests, capture errors through webhooks, and open pull requests, all while they’re away from their desks.” You can probably already see how this experimental technology could go sideways in a hurry. […]
Last month, Meta AI safety director Summer Yue said OpenClaw unexpectedly started mass-deleting messages in her email inbox, despite instructions to confirm those actions first. She wrote: “Nothing humbles you like telling your OpenClaw ‘confirm before acting’ and watching it speedrun deleting your inbox. I couldn’t stop it from my phone. I had to RUN to my Mac mini like I was defusing a bomb.”

Krebs also noted the many misconfigured OpenClaw installations users had set up, leaving their administrative dashboards publicly accessible online. According to pentester Jamieson O’Reilly, “a cursory search revealed hundreds of such servers exposed online.” When those exposed interfaces are accessed, attackers can retrieve the agent’s configuration and sensitive credentials. O’Reilly warned attackers could access “every credential the agent uses — from API keys and bot tokens to OAuth secrets and signing keys.”

“You can pull the full conversation history across every integrated platform, meaning months of private messages and file attachments, everything the agent has seen,” O’Reilly added. And because you control the agent’s perception layer, you can manipulate what the human sees. Filter out certain messages. Modify responses before they’re displayed.”

Clueless people doing clueless things

By gweihir • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

With technology they do not understand. Is this a security risk? Yes, massively so. Can it be fixed? To the best of our knowledge only by not running these agents except inside heavily isolated sand-boxes. Which kind of defeats their purposes. But LLMs cannot ever be really reliable ans that is what is needed for any security-critical mechanism. Too many people are just bright-eyed naive and expect things from their shiny new fetish that it cannot deliver.

In other words, bad idea is bad idea.

Re:Clueless people doing clueless things

By nightflameauto • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

With technology they do not understand. Is this a security risk? Yes, massively so. Can it be fixed? To the best of our knowledge only by not running these agents except inside heavily isolated sand-boxes. Which kind of defeats their purposes. But LLMs cannot ever be really reliable ans that is what is needed for any security-critical mechanism. Too many people are just bright-eyed naive and expect things from their shiny new fetish that it cannot deliver.

In other words, bad idea is bad idea.

This is the biggest problem with the current AI prophets’ promises. People in this day and age are stupid enough to believe the peddlers of the new snake oil outright, rather than viewing this new thing as an avenue of research that must be tested before being given the keys to “do the things.” For some reason, people just believe when it’s new tech, without proof. And beyond that, with all kinds of proof that the things being promised aren’t just not yet real, they may very well be impossible to achieve with the methods currently being used.

From the start there have been those of us saying that the fear we have of current gen AI is not so much the AI itself. It’s that humans are going to put these non-thinking machines in charge of important decisions which will lead to terrible outcomes. And even as we see some of those terrible outcomes becoming real, people are still believing in the infallibility of these machines.

The only possible bright side in all of this is that at some point they will fuck up so horribly that people will have no choice but to realize machines are not akin to god. Let’s just hope that the fuck up that finally wakes people up isn’t the one that also ends humanity. Unfortunately, we just may be dumb enough to give them that capability before we snap out of it.

Re:Clueless people doing clueless things

By gweihir • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Yes, indeed.

But the other problem is that while in telephone networks, you can use out-of-band signaling, and, after decades of attacks and problems, this is now the standard. For LLMs, that is not possible. There is only one channel and everything goes into it. Maybe there will eventually be other AI types that can separate data and control reliable, while using similar knowledge-bases to LLMs. But LLMs will not be it. The very principle they operate on is that everything is seen as language. Without that, the idea stops working.

Got to be a honey trap.

By BeaverCleaver • Score: 3 Thread

This whole concept is so crazy. Even “non-techy” people know about identity theft, not sharing passwords etc. The news has been full of amusing “AI” fuckups since the models became public. Most of those stories are riffs on the 1980s “computer fucked up” news stories from the 1980s. Even Joe Sixpack knows that computers can’t be trusted.

So why the hell is anyone letting an LLM near anything useful or important? How are vendors marketing these “assistant” tools? At this point I can only conclude that it’s a deliberate plot by OpenClaw et al to mine users’ data so they have something else of value before the “AI” bubble pops. Either that, or OpenClaw et al are just a front for some three-letter agency, just like those “Anom” phones from a few years ago. Or Crypto AG from years before that.

AI: The Billionare Created Invasive Nightmare

By BrendaEM • Score: 3 Thread
There’s no way to sugarcoat it: AI’s massive data theft must be controlled. AI is the 2nd most harmful invention humanity has ever made.

Bluesky CEO Jay Graber Is Stepping Down

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Bluesky CEO Jay Graber is stepping down after overseeing the platform’s growth from a Twitter research project into a 40-million-user alternative to X. “As Bluesky matures, the company needs a seasoned operator focused on scaling and execution, while I return to what I do best: building new things,” Graber wrote in a statement.

She will be transitioning to a new Chief Innovation Officer role while Venture capitalist Toni Schneider will serve as interim CEO until the board searches for a permanent replacement. Wired reports:
Graber joined Bluesky in 2019, when it was a research project within Twitter focused on developing a decentralized framework for the social web. She became the company’s first chief executive officer in 2021, when it spun out into an independent entity. She oversaw the platform’s remarkable rise and the growing pains it experienced as it transformed from a quirky Twitter offshoot to a full-fledged alternative to X. Schneider tells WIRED that he intends to help Bluesky “become not just the best open social app, but the foundation for a whole new generation of user-owned networks.”

Schneider, who will continue working as a partner at the venture capital firm True Ventures while at Bluesky, was previously CEO of the Wordpress parent company, Automattic, from 2006 to 2014. He also served as its CEO again in 2024 while top executive Matt Mullenweg went on a sabbatical. During that time, Schneider met Graber and became an adviser to Bluesky’s leadership. In a blog post announcing his new role, Schneider said he plans to emphasize scaling, describing his job as “to help set up Bluesky’s next phase of growth.”

This isn’t the end for Graber and Bluesky. She will transition to become the company’s chief innovation officer, a role focused on Bluesky’s technology stack rather than its business operations. The position was created for her. Graber, who began her career as a software engineer, has always sounded the most enthusiastic when discussing Bluesky’s technology rather than its revenue streams. Bluesky’s board of directors will appoint the next permanent CEO. The members include Jabber founder Jeremie Miller, crypto-focused VC Kinjal Shah, TechDirt founder Mike Masnick, and Graber. (Twitter founder Jack Dorsey was originally part of the board but quit in 2024.) This means Graber will have input on her successor. The talent search is still in early stages.

Then put your money where your mouth is

By karmawarrior • Score: 3, Informative Thread

> Schneider tells WIRED that he intends to help Bluesky “become not just the best open social app, but the foundation for a whole new generation of user-owned networks.”

Bluesky will remain a normal monolithic network as long as its owned and controlled by one group. If they want to prove they intend to do what they’re claiming they want to do, they need to decentralize, and split the company into multiple (at least 3) social network portals with their own critical infrastructure.

For now, there’s only one decentralized network, and it’s not BS.

Re:No need to worry

By AmiMoJo • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

I like Bluesky. I don’t need to live on the edge all the time, I don’t need to near what Twitter Nazis have to say. If that’s a bubble then I’m okay with it, it’s got cats and some politics and it’s not my only source of information.

Maybe it’s too good for the capitalist world we live in and won’t survive, but if it dies I won’t be going back to Twitter.

Someone should make a Bluesky for Reddit. Reddit without the gaslighting and moderation abuse.

Re:No need to worry

By apparently • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
If you’re constantly getting Blocked on Bluesky, that’s a YOU problem, princess. You can whine all you want about it, but nothing changes the fact that no one is obligated to engage with you.

Re: No need to worry

By kellin • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Most recent data I could find shows:

Truth Social 6 million active
Gettr 9 million (total, maybe half are active)
Bluesky 40 million with about 3.5 million active.

Re: No need to worry

By ArmoredDragon • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

I don’t believe it’s about who they ban so much as who creates an account there to begin with, and even then, actively participates, and even still, what they actually talk about.

Of the major social media platforms, I tend to abserve the following:
- Twitter: anything and everything, even though the vast majority of it is completely useless
- YouTube: anything and everything, even if most of it is demonetized
- Reddit: anything and everything, if it weren’t for the fact that the vast majority of it is automatically blocked and/or shadowbanned by AIs of infinite wisdom
- TikTok: Endless scroll of content that isn’t given the time of day to be meaningful, but also an endless dopamine hit for stupid people. Effectively a poor man’s heroine
- Fecebook: Endless scroll of cat memes and people reacting to stupid shit their neighbor did last night
- Bluesky: Endless scroll of outrage and doom about something in the current news cycle, especially if some other unknown person must surely find it offensive because of their identity

Only three of these occasionally have something worthwhile. The rest do not.

Regardless, while I understand that you desire to ad-hominem everybody you don’t like by labeling them a nazi, and require that all nazis be banned, all this does is firmly ensnare you into an echo chamber. While echo chambers might make you feel good, they aren’t intellectually stimulating.

Bluesky may as well just be “TikTok for assholes” because being in the right echo chamber yields dopamine. Sure, other sites have their share of assholes, big ones at that, but in their defense, at least they have other stuff too.

Qualcomm’s New Arduino Ventuno Q Is an AI-Focused Computer Designed For Robotics

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Qualcomm and Arduino have unveiled the Arduino Ventuno Q, a new AI-focused single-board computer built for robotics and edge systems. Engadget reports:
Called the Arduino Ventuno Q, it uses Qualcomm’s Dragonwing IQ8 processor along with a dedicated STM32H5 low-latency microcontroller (MCU). “Ventuno Q is engineered specifically for systems that move, manipulate and respond to the physical world with precision and reliability,” the company wrote on the product page. The Ventuno Q is more sophisticated (and expensive) than Arduinio’s usual AIO boards, thanks to the Dragonwing IQ8 processor that includes an 8-core ARM Cortex CPU, Adreno Arm Cortex A623 GPU and Hexagon Tensor NPU that can hit up ot 40 TOPs. It also comes with 16GB of LPDDR5 RAM, along with 64GB of eMMC storage and an M.2 NVME Gen.4 slot to expand that. Other features include Wi-Fi 6, Bluetooth 5.3, 2.5Gbps ethernet and USB camera support.

The Ventuno Q includes Arudino App Lab, with pre-trained AI models including LLMs, VLMs, ASR, gesture recognition, pose estimation and object tracking, all running offline. It’s designed for AI systems that run entirely offline like smart kiosks, healthcare assistants and traffic flow analysis, along with Edge AI vision and sensing systems. It also supports a full robotics stack including vision processing combined with deterministic motor control for precise vision and manipulation. It’s also ideal for education and research in areas like computer vision, generative AI and prototyping at the edge, according to Arduino.
Further reading: Up Next for Arduino After Qualcomm Acquisition: High-Performance Computing

Don’t

By hwstar • Score: 3 Thread

Qualcomm is known for their contracts written on flypaper. They have a whole department which does lawyerly things (QTL).

Stay Away

Meh

By Pf0tzenpfritz • Score: 3 Thread

> It’s designed for AI systems that run entirely offline like smart kiosks, healthcare assistants and traffic flow analysis, along with Edge AI vision and sensing systems.

Yes. Typical Arduino use cases, obviously.

Pricing

By yo303 • Score: 3 Thread

Pricing was conveniently left out of the summary. It should be less than $300 in 2Q26.

Anthropic Sues the Pentagon After Being Labeled a Threat To National Security

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Anthropic is suing the Department of Defense after the Trump administration labeled the company a “supply chain risk” and canceled its government contracts when Anthropic refused to allow its AI model Claude to be used for domestic surveillance or autonomous weapons. Fortune reports:
The lawsuit, filed Monday in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, calls the administration’s actions “unprecedented and unlawful” and claims they threaten to harm “Anthropic irreparably.” The complaint claims that government contracts are already being canceled and that private contracts are also in doubt, putting “hundreds of millions of dollars” at near-term risk.

An Anthropic spokesperson told Fortune: “Seeking judicial review does not change our longstanding commitment to harnessing AI to protect our national security, but this is a necessary step to protect our business, our customers, and our partners.” “We will continue to pursue every path toward resolution, including dialogue with the government,” they added.

Re:Anyone can sue…

By AleRunner • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Anthropic itself put something out a few months ago about how their platform had been used for hacking a secure network. When I read their article for details, there was very little about what was done, or how, but a LOT that implied that their platform was fucking awesome because it completed this task.

Sure, you are right. There are threats there, just as there are threats from explosives, which can be used for terrorism. That doesn’t mean that the army is going to stop using explosives.

Let’s not, though, pretend that this ban from the DoD us because of those risks. It’s because Anthropic wanted to mitigate one specific risk - that AI would be used to illegally spy on US citizens. OpenAI has replaced them because openAI was willing to take an agreement which did not block illegal spying on US citizens.

Re:Well… They kind of are.

By WaffleMonster • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

It’s nothing like that, at all. It is exactly as I laid it out. They have a world class capability they are selling as a service. The US wants to use that service. They said no. They refuse to sell to the US (or in this case say the US is violating the TOS) for legitimate wartime needs. It’s like a steel plant deciding not to sell to the US to make munitions.

Private organizations have no duty to change terms of contracts or products to satisfy requirements of their customers if they don’t feel like it. If you as a customer find the product lacking or don’t agree to the vendors terms your recourse is to take your business elsewhere. There is no excuse for blatant retaliatory abuses of power.

The thing that is really fucked about all of this is they agreed to a contract and now the pentagon is throwing a public hissy fit because it wants a new deal with new terms that are unacceptable to the vendor. Welcome to the real world where you don’t get everything you want.

We NEED capable AI, it’s not an option. If they are going to piggy hog the energy and GPUs then they’re out… There is only so much AI capability out there. It’s a reasonable position.

We NEED it so bad we are going to blacklist the company and make sure all of our suppliers can’t use it either. This position is an oxymoron.

Re:Anyone can sue…

By sg_oneill • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Oh this ones a no-brainer, and I predicted it the moment I heard. There are constitution prohibitions on bills of attainder and long long judicial precedent against malicious targetting of individual or companies using the power of the state. Furthermore the president and hegseth both have quite publically expressed this designation as essentially a blackmail threat demanding Anthropic forfeit their constitutionally protected right to free association and expression or they’d be commercially sunk if they dont aquiesse.

This will be a walk in the park for anthropic and it would be *very* weird if they don’t win.

Re:Well… They kind of are.

By sg_oneill • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Except thats nots whats happening here. They had them declared a “supply chain risk”. That means that *any* company doing *any* business with the government are forbidden from *any* dealing with them. Its a designation designed for comanies like Huwei that are run by the chinese government. Its not designed for use to let the military threaten american companies that if they dont weaponise their product they can’t even sell to the company that sells toilet rolls to the forestry service.

Regardless, this designation is fundamentally lawless in this case, violates anthropics first ammendment rights and ammounts to a bill of attainder so iI suspect its highly unlikely that the court wont throw this out.

Re: Anyone can sue…

By MachineShedFred • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

This is seriously the dumbest take, and I keep seeing it.

Who ever said that Anthropic feels they are entitled to anything? They have a contract with the government, which the government agreed to and signed without coercion. That contract was negotiated by both sides in good faith, and agreed to.

And why does the government feel they are entitled to use a service however they wish, especially when it’s expressly against the terms of the contract that the government agreed to and signed?

Do you now feel that the government should be able to alter any contract terms they are beholden to and don’t want to be? Does that sound like a good idea to you?

Did you watch the end of The Empire Strikes Back and think Vader was right to unilaterally “alter the deal” and tell Calrissian that he better prey that he doesn’t alter it further?

Dumbass.

‘If Lockheed Martin Made a Game Boy, Would You Buy One?’

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
“If Lockheed Martin made a Game Boy, would you buy one?” That was the [rhetorical] question The Verge’s Sean Hollister asked when he reviewed ModRetro’s Game Boy-style handheld device back in 2024. He said it “might be the best version of the Game Boy ever made,” though the connection to Palmer Luckey and his defense tech startup Anduril left him conflicted. “I don’t remember my childhood nostalgia coming with a side of possible guilt and fear about putting money into the pocket of a weapons contractor,” he wrote. “Feels weird!”

Those conflicted feelings have lingered ever since. TechCrunch recently cited Hollister’s review while reporting that ModRetro is now seeking funding at a $1 billion valuation. The company is said to have additional retro-inspired hardware in development, including one designed to replicate the Nintendo 64. As for Anduril? It’s reportedly in talks to raise a new funding round that would value the company at around $60 billion.

What’s the conflict?

By Valgrus Thunderaxe • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
I don’t see any issue here with Palmer Lucky making a gaming device.

Childhood nostalgia guilt?

By thegarbz • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

You were a kid, you wouldn’t have given an iota of a shit if Nintendo’s CEO ate babies.

Re:What’s the conflict?

By sabbede • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
And so long as the answer to the question “for who” was, “The US and her Allies”, I’d be fine with it.

If Porsche or VW ever made tanks, would you buy th

By HnT • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

If Porsche and VW ever made tanks, would you buy their cars? What about Bayer, certain chemicals, and buying their Aspirin?

What radical-postmodernist guilt-by-association BS is this??!!! Are weapons manufacturer now by definition super duper evil and society somehow has to shun them altho by law they are legal..? WTF is this vigilante pseudo-justice activism BS???

The-new-left and radical-postmodernism were a mistake.

If Lockheed Martin…

By ahoffer0 • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

…made a game boy, it would cost 1.2 million dollars and arrive 7 years late.

AI Allows Hackers To Identify Anonymous Social Media Accounts, Study Finds

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from the Guardian:
AI has made it vastly easier for malicious hackers to identify anonymous social media accounts, a new study has warned. In most test scenarios, large language models (LLMs) — the technology behind platforms such as ChatGPT — successfully matched anonymous online users with their actual identities on other platforms, based on the information they posted. The AI researchers Simon Lermen and Daniel Paleka said LLMs make it cost effective to perform sophisticated privacy attacks, forcing a “fundamental reassessment of what can be considered private online”.

In their experiment, the researchers fed anonymous accounts into an AI, and got it to scrape all the information it could. They gave a hypothetical example of a user talking about struggling at school, and walking their dog Biscuit through a “Dolores park.” In that hypothetical case, the AI then searched elsewhere for those details and matched @anon_user42 to the known identity with a high degree of confidence. While this example was fictional, the paper’s authors highlighted scenarios in which governments use AI to surveil dissidents and activists posting anonymously, or hackers are able to launch “highly personalized” scams.

a day in the park

By bugs2squash • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
I was walking my dog, Felicity, through Hegsketh park yesterday when I came across an oak tree, which, as you know, is an all consuming personal interest of mine

If their personal info is not online…

By Anonymous Coward • Score: 3, Insightful Thread

This only works if they actually have legitimate profiles elsewhere. I guess this means people who are truly anonymous can and will remain anonymous. It’s only fools who actually post real information online.

It would be a hell of a lot more helpful..

By geekmux • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

..if AI helped identify the AI slop-infested dogshit acting as “anonymous” to enrage a partisan populous.

Let’s see how good it is at telling on itself. For clickbait and spams sake.

Anonymous accounts are easy to identify

By greytree • Score: 3, Funny Thread
Anonymous accounts are easy to identify - they don’t have a real name on them.

Oh, you meant the accounts were de-anonymized and the users identified ?

Then write that.

I learned this lesson 27 years ago

By Tablizer • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

as a troll used search engines to cross-reference various clues I had inadvertently left behind on the internet to dox me. It only required determination, not rocket science. Bots have all the time in the world to clue-hop.

Swiss Vote Places Right To Use Cash In Country’s Constitution

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Swiss voters overwhelmingly approved a constitutional amendment guaranteeing the right to use physical cash. “The vote means Switzerland will join the likes of Hungary, Slovakia and Slovenia, which have already written the right to cold, hard cash in their constitutions,” reports Politico. From the report:
Official results revealed that 73.4 percent of voters backed the legal amendment, which the government proposed as a counter to a similar initiative by a group called the Swiss Freedom Movement. The Swiss Freedom Movement triggered the national referendum after its initiative to protect cash collected more than 100,000 signatures, triggering a national referendum. Its initiative secured only 46 percent of the final vote after the government said some of the group’s proposed amendments went too far.

good

By hjf • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

in a world of “age verification laws” and governments pushing for “cashless”, and precedents like Canada freezing protesters bank accounts, yes.

governments are turning ultra fascist everywhere. doesn’t matter if they say they’re left wing progressive. they’re after your internet anonymity and want you to keep your money in banks, mostly to avoid tax evasion.

(cue in europeans saying they’re not fascist and i’m a dumb american etc and canadians justifying the bank account freezing because it was aligned with the party’s interest)

Re:good

By serviscope_minor • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

(cue in europeans saying they’re not fascist and i’m a dumb american etc and canadians justifying the bank account freezing because it was aligned with the party’s interest)

Cue a European saying: u wot, m8?

Not everything you don’t like is fascist. Something can be bad without being fascist. Also what specifically are you talking about here?

Just imagine what could happen in USA

By bussdriver • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

If Trump could stop his enemies from being able to spend their money? He hasn’t figured out he could do that already… outside of international sanctions he already places on people he doesn’t like just doing their jobs. (ICC judges)

FYI: in the USA, it’s the law that currency has to be acceptable payment (since the great depression.) This law is often ignored these days and it doesn’t specify physical money allowing legalese to render it almost pointless.

The state dept under Hillary blocked wikileaks without any laws; simply asking credit cards to block it, as a favor. I bet more of the swiss know of such things than Americans… who have been proven their stupidity. Hey, I’m one but I’m in the minority; one of the smart Americans. Many of us still have shame and it should be used heavily; we’re not smart enough for facts and reason… again, this is proven.

Re:Just imagine what could happen in USA

By Chris Mattern • Score: 4, Informative Thread

It is permissible to make the form of payment a condition of sale. Once the sale is made, the debt by law can be settled in cash—unless it was part of the terms of sale that payment must be by some other means. You’ll only pay in cash? Then I won’t sell to you. This is allowed.

That’s not what the vote was about

By tele • Score: 5, Informative Thread
I’m aware that Swiss politics is sometimes difficult to understand if you grew up in other countries. In the case here, the title (and the Politico reporting) is at least misleading. What we did vote on (and approve) is a new paragraph in the constitution which says “Die Schweizerische Nationalbank gewÃhrleistet die Bargeldversorgung” (roughly translates to “The Swiss National Bank ensures the supply of cash”). We did *not* vote about whether businesses (or private citizens) need to accept cash as well. So while the vote ensures that there is always enough cash available for people who want to pay with cash, nothing ensures that they will be able to use that cash wherever they want. I doubt that a vote to force everybody to *accept* cash (instead of credit cards etc) would gather a majority.

US Military Tested Device That May Be Tied To Havana Syndrome On Rats, Sheep

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from CBS News:
Tonight, we have details of a classified U.S. intelligence mission that has obtained a previously unknown weapon that may finally unlock a mystery. Since at least 2016, U.S. diplomats, spies and military officers have suffered crippling brain injuries. They’ve told of being hit by an overwhelming force, damaging their vision, hearing, sense of balance and cognition. but the government has doubted their stories. They’ve been called delusional. Well now, 60 Minutes has learned that a weapon that can inflict these injuries was obtained overseas and secretly tested on animals on a U.S. military base. We’ve investigated this mystery for nine years. This is our fourth story called, “Targeting Americans.” Despite official government doubt, we never stopped reporting because of the haunting stories we heard […].
60 Minutes interviewed Dr. David Relman, a scientific expert and professor from Stanford University who was tasked by the government to lead two investigations into the Havana Syndrome cases. What he and his panel of doctors, physicists, engineers and others found was that “the most plausible explanation for a subset of these cases was a form of radiofrequency or microwave energy,” the report says.

According to confidential sources cited in the report, undercover Homeland Security agents bought a miniaturized microwave weapon from a Russian criminal network in 2024 and tested it on animals at a U.S. military lab. The injuries reportedly matched those seen in the human cases. “Our confidential sources tell us the still classified weapon has been tested in a U.S. military lab for more than a year,” says Dr. Relman. “Tests on rats and sheep show injuries consistent with those seen in humans.”

He continues: “Also, as a separate part of the investigation, security camera videos have been collected that show Americans being hit. The videos are classified but they were described to us. In one, a camera in a restaurant in Istanbul captured two FBI agents on vacation sitting at a table with their families. A man with a backpack walks in and suddenly everyone at the table grabs their head as if in pain. Our sources say another video comes from a stairwell in the U.S. embassy in Vienna. The stairs lead to a secure facility. In the video, two people on the stairs suddenly collapse. Those videos and the weapon were among the reasons the Biden administration summoned about half a dozen victims to the White House with about two months left in the president’s term.”

Former intelligence officials and researchers claim elements of the U.S. government downplayed or dismissed the theory for years, possibly to avoid political consequences of accusing a foreign state like Russia of conducting attacks on American personnel.

Magneto

By TwistedGreen • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Henceforth all overseas US military personnel must wear Magneto helmets at all times.

Hasn’t it already been used?

By 0xG • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Seems to me that I read earlier that it had already been deployed during the attack on Venezuela.

Invulnerable politicians

By algaeman • Score: 3 Thread
Can’t brain damage someone that is already brain damaged (or never had a brain)

Read the wiki

By argStyopa • Score: 3, Interesting Thread

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…

After a fair amount of confusion and some academic arguments, DoD pushed hard to have this taken seriously.

“The Department of Defense (DoD) established the task force partly due to frustration over what DoD officials considered to be a sluggish and lackluster response by the CIA and Department of State.[39] Christopher C. Miller, who was acting defense secretary at the time, said in 2021 that “I knew CIA and Department of State were not taking this shit seriously and we wanted to shame them into it by establishing our task force.”[39] Miller said that he began to consider the reports of mysterious symptoms to be a high priority in December 2020, after he conducted an interview with a person with major combat experience who detailed symptoms.[39]"

As late as 2022, CIA: “The study concluded that it was unlikely that a foreign power was responsible for the AHIs, and that the study had not yet found evidence of involvement by a state actor.”

2023: Five of the seven agencies involved in generating the report concluded “the available intelligence consistently points against the involvement of US adversaries in causing the reported incidents” and that a foreign adversary’s involvement was “very unlikely”. One of the other agencies concluded that foreign involvement was “unlikely”, and the seventh agency declined to make a finding.[127][130][129]

Doubt

By Artem S. Tashkinov • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Tests on rats and sheep show injuries consistent with those seen in humans.

Weird. I thought/read that the affected people showed no changes in their biology/chemistry/MRI, so how did they ask rats and sheep whether they experienced the same symptoms?

New SETI Study: Why We Might Have Been Missing Alien Signals

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
After decades of searching for extraterrestrial intelligence, the nonprofit SETI Foundation has an announcement. “A new study by researchers at the SETI Institute suggests stellar ‘space weather’ could make radio signals from extraterrestrial intelligence harder to detect.”
Stellar activity and plasma turbulence near a transmitting planet can broaden an otherwise ultra-narrow signal, spreading its power across more frequencies and making it more difficult to detect in traditional narrowband searches. For decades, many SETI experiments have focused on identifying spikes in frequency — signals unlikely to be produced by natural astrophysical processes. But the new research highlights an overlooked complication: even if an extraterrestrial transmitter produces a perfectly narrow signal, it may not remain narrow by the time it leaves its home system… “If a signal gets broadened by its own star’s environment, it can slip below our detection thresholds, even if it’s there, potentially helping explain some of the radio silence we’ve seen in technosignature searches,” said Dr. Vishal Gajjar, Astronomer at the SETI Institute and lead author of the paper.
The researchers created “a practical framework for estimating how much broadening could occur for different types of stars” — and accounting for space weather — by “using radio transmissions from spacecraft in our own solar system, then extrapolated to other stellar environments.”

The study’s co-author (a SETI Institute research assistant) suggests this coud lead to better-targetted SETI searches. (M-dwarf stars — about 75% of stars in the Milky Way — actually have the highest likelihood that narrowband signals would get broadened before leaving their system…)

Re:Peak Detectability

By k4hg • Score: 5, Informative Thread

In ATSC8VSB 0.5% of the power is in the pilot tone, the rest is spread over the entire bandwidth as subcarriers. Analog TV put 70% of the signal into the single frequency of the carrier. Add in doppler shifts from planet rotation and the perspective from space of seeing all stations on all the channels, and you would be left with a sight rise in the background noise, not a detectable signal.

Required signal strength ?

By SpinyNorman • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

I’d be interested to see some analysis of how strong of a signal an alien civilization would need to be transmitting for us to have any chance of detecting it with our networks of radio telescopes.

Sure we can hear Voyager’s weak signal, which is impressive, but in the galactic scale of things it is right beside us, only just having left our solar system.

Any potential aliens are much, much further away … On a scale where our sun is a grain of sand, the closest star is another grain of sand 600 miles away, with radio signal strength weakening according to an inverse square law.

Of course it’s almost certain that the closest alien civilization (assuming one exists) capable of radio transmission isn’t so conveniently close by, and if it was on the other side of our galaxy (100,000 light years away, not just 4), then what sort of transmitter power would they need to be using? The inverse square law is brutal.

What if the nearest civilization if not even in our own galaxy?

Re:Frequency Spikes?

By Sique • Score: 5, Informative Thread
Lightning spikes are not narrow-band.

You are misinterpreting the words. A frequency spice means a signal, which has a high power in a very narrow range of frequencies. A lightning is a very high power in a short amount of time. Those are two different types of phenomenon.

Maybe SETI should rethink their whole approach?

By Sique • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
I am pretty sure that SETI is looking at the problem the wrong way.

If all you have is a 1950ies radio antenna, what would you make of today’s mobile phone signals? Would you recognize them as being artificial?

Already in the 1960ies, Polish SF author Stanislaw Lem in his essay “Summa technologiae” doubted the idea of “techno signatures” in radio signals. His argument? With better technology, we are better able to use the bandwidth of our signals, and with better usage of the bandwidth, the required signal-to-noise ratio gets lower, and the signal looks more and more like white noise to someone not knowing the technology. Additional, the power requirements to transmit a signal gets lower and lower too, and much less signal is wasted into space. The time frame in which electromagnetic waves from artificial sources look noticeably different from natural radiation is very short, it was less than 100 years for the human civilization.

Re:Required signal strength ?

By SpinyNorman • Score: 5, Informative Thread

I expect that life itself is not rare - that the universe is teaming with life, but maybe only at simple prokaryotic cell type of level. The emergence of “life” (self encoding self-replicators) from non-life seems somewhat inevitable when a few conditions are in place.

The case for advanced civilizations being rare is from looking at the earth (a sample of one, but still …). Earth is almost as old as the universe. Simple life here arose almost immediately about 4B years ago, but it took another 2B years for eukaryotic cells to emerge, the Cambiran Explosion of diversity of life only happened 500M years ago, humans only emerged a few million years ago, and our ability to transmit radio signals happened yesterday.

Earth seems like a goldilocks planet, so why to expect a much different timeline on other planets? Some of these transitions such as from simple replicator cells to eukaryotic ones with the complexity necessary for multi-cellular life are apparently far from a slam-dunk (having taken 2B years to happen here, and by all estimates only ever having happened once). If life here on earth, almost as old as the universe itself, only became capable of transmitting a radio signal 100 years ago, then why to expect that life on other planets is so much further than ahead of us? Maybe there is another radio-transmitting civilization on the other side of our galaxy, but if they only just started transmitting 100 years ago, then the radio signals are still in transit and will take another 100,000 years to reach us … assuming they were transmitting at whatever absurd power levels would be necessary for us to be able to detect it.

EFF, Ubuntu and Other Distros Discuss How to Respond to Age-Verification Laws

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot
System76 isn’t the only one criticizing new age-verification laws. The blog 9to5Linux published an “informal” look at other discussions in various Linux communities.
Earlier this week, Ubuntu developer Aaron Rainbolt proposed on the Ubuntu mailing list an optional D-Bus interface (org.freedesktop.AgeVerification1) that can be implemented by arbitrary applications as a distro sees fit, but Canonical responded that the company does not yet have a solution to announce for age declaration in Ubuntu. “Canonical is aware of the legislation and is reviewing it internally with legal counsel, but there are currently no concrete plans on how, or even whether, Ubuntu will change in response,” said Jon Seager, VP Engineering at Canonical. “The recent mailing list post is an informal conversation among Ubuntu community members, not an announcement. While the discussion contains potentially useful ideas, none have been adopted or committed to by Canonical.”

Similar talks are underway in the Fedora and Linux Mint communities about this issue in case the California Digital Age Assurance Act law and similar laws from other states and countries are to be enforced. At the same time, other OS developers, like MidnightBSD, have decided to exclude California from desktop use entirely.
Slashdot contacted Hayley Tsukayama, Director of State Affairs at EFF, who says their organization “has long warned against age-gating the internet. Such mandates strike at the foundation of the free and open internet.”

And there’s another problem. “Many of these mandates imagine technology that does not currently exist.”
Such poorly thought-out mandates, in truth, cannot achieve the purported goal of age verification. Often, they are easy to circumvent and many also expose consumers to real data breach risk.

These burdens fall particularly heavily on developers who aren’t at large, well-resourced companies, such as those developing open-source software. Not recognizing the diversity of software development when thinking about liability in these proposals effectively limits software choices — and at a time when computational power is being rapidly concentrated in the hands of the few. That harms users’ and developers’ right to free expression, their digital liberties, privacy, and ability to create and use open platforms…

Rather than creating age gates, a well-crafted privacy law that empowers all of us — young people and adults alike — to control how our data is collected and used would be a crucial step in the right direction.

Re:I’ve lost the plot on these laws

By Stormwatch • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

They are the first step toward a slippery slope toward a ban on anonymity.

Re:I’ve lost the plot on these laws

By Tom • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

They are the first step toward a slippery slope toward a ban on anonymity.

It’s much more than a slippery slope. It’s an intentional trap. Politicians have been trying to remove anonymity from the Internet from basically the time their kids first told them about it. Nothing has been more consistent than these constant attempts, usually under the typical “protect the chiiiiildren” guise.

Mind you, the same type of people crying “protect the children” are the type of people who visited Epstein island.

Re:Think of the children!

By rsilvergun • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Newsome himself said the law was poorly written but he signed it anyway because anyone who doesn’t is going to get ripped to pieces in elections with think of the children bullshit.

I don’t know what you do with a voting electorate that is so low information and has so little critical thinking skills that they can’t see why this is a problem and that would be vulnerable to attack ads launched against politicians over voting against the law of this bad.

Bottom line we need smarter voters

Re:I’ve lost the plot on these laws

By AleRunner • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

They are the first step toward a slippery slope toward a ban on anonymity.

I hate to be a doomsayer, but it’s actually even worse than that. The ban on anonymity is a step towards a ban on effective security. This comes from the same people as did the “clipper” chip where all encryption would be done in government controlled hardware and allow them to break it as needed, with the side effect that state level enemy governments could also do it.

Already in the UK, there are moves to regulate and ban VPNs that allow you to maintain security against the age verification systems.

Re:Think of the children!

By korgitser • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Calling things memes is a meme, too. How many DC critters do we have that did not party with Epstein? And if we should find some that did not, have any of them taken a stand against any of it, or are they but mere enablers? Is it then a stretch to call them all pedophiles?

According to this study from Cambridge https://doi.org/10.1017/S15375… voter preference has no correlation with policy outcomes in the US. But money does. To rephrase it in the context of your post, politicians only care about the issues people with money have. And that’s not really a surprise. The primary concern of getting power is getting financed to run your campaigns. The financing does not come from the voters. So your actual campaign is made to secure donor support, and you do that by promising, and having a track record of, working for their interests. Once you have the finances, you use them to create and advertise messaging you think will resonate with the voters. But as the study shows, that resonance of messaging does not translate into policy outcomes for the voters.

My call is that far from making voters powerless, admitting problems is the first step towards solving them. Thus, the most important empowering there is.