Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. OpenAI Amends Pentagon Deal As Sam Altman Admits It Looks ‘Sloppy’
  2. Accenture Acquires Ookla, Downdetector As Part of $1.2 Billion Deal
  3. India’s Top Court Angry After Junior Judge Cites Fake AI-Generated Orders
  4. Apple Launches New M5 Chips, MacBook Pro, and First New Monitors In Years
  5. AI-Generated Art Can’t Be Copyrighted After Supreme Court Declines To Review the Rule
  6. ChatGPT Uninstalls Surged By 295% After Pentagon Deal
  7. Hacked Tehran Traffic Cameras Fed Israeli Intelligence Before Strike On Khamenei
  8. Amazon Cloud Unit’s Data Centers In UAE, Bahrain Damaged In Drone Strikes
  9. The 19th Century Silent Film That First Captured a Robot Attack
  10. Superagers’ ‘Secret Ingredient’ May Be the Growth of New Brain Cells
  11. Iowa County Rolls Out Extensive Zoning Rules For Data Centers
  12. British Columbia To End Time Changes, Adopt Year-Round Daylight Time
  13. Apple Might Use Google Servers To Store Data For Its Upgraded AI Siri
  14. HBO Max and Paramount+ To Merge Into One Streaming Service
  15. Charter Gets FCC Permission To Buy Cox, Become Largest ISP In the US

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

OpenAI Amends Pentagon Deal As Sam Altman Admits It Looks ‘Sloppy’

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
OpenAI is amending its Pentagon contract after CEO Sam Altman acknowledged it appeared “opportunistic and sloppy.” On Monday night, Altman said the company would explicitly restrict its technology from being used by intelligence agencies and for mass domestic surveillance. The Guardian reports:
OpenAI, which has more than 900 million users of ChatGPT, made the deal almost immediately after the Pentagon’s existing AI contractor, Anthropic, was dropped. […] The deal prompted an online backlash against OpenAI, with users of X and Reddit encouraging a “delete ChatGPT” campaign. One post read: “You’re now training a war machine. Let’s see proof of cancellation.”

In a message to employees reposted on X, the OpenAI CEO said the original deal announced on Friday had been struck too quickly after Anthropic was dropped. “We shouldn’t have rushed to get this out on Friday,” Altman wrote. “The issues are super complex, and demand clear communication. We were genuinely trying to de-escalate things and avoid a much worse outcome, but I think it just looked opportunistic and sloppy.” Upon announcing the deal, OpenAI had said the contract had “more guardrails than any previous agreement for classified AI deployments, including Anthropic’s.”

[…] However, observers including OpenAI’s former head of policy research, Miles Brundage, have queried how OpenAI has managed to secure a deal that assuages ethical concerns Anthropic believed were insurmountable. Posting on X, he wrote: “OpenAI employees’ default assumption here should unfortunately be that OpenAI caved + framed it as not caving, and screwed Anthropic while framing it as helping them.” Brundage added: “To be clear, OAI is a complex org, and I think many people involved in this worked hard for what they consider a fair outcome. Some others I do not trust at all, particularly as it relates to dealings with government and politics.”

In his X post, he also wrote that he would “rather go to jail” than follow an unconstitutional order from the government. “We want to work through democratic processes,” Brundage wrote. “It should be the government making the key decisions about society. We want to have a voice, and a seat at the table where we can share our expertise, and to fight for principles of liberty.”

Altman

By RitchCraft • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

I don’t believe a single thing this guy says. It’s all BS and greed.

It doesn’t look sloppy at all

By matthewcharles2006 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
It only looks sloppy to people that took Altman’s statement at face value (if that was you, please stop eating glue its not good for you). I think to most of us it was a clear and decisive move to leverage OpenAI’s relative lack of morales for some big bucks. Everyone in America realizes at this point that hiding behind “the government promises to obey the law” was never particularly believable but has become farcical in 2026.

Accenture Acquires Ookla, Downdetector As Part of $1.2 Billion Deal

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Accenture is acquiring Downdetector parent company Ookla from Ziff Davis in a $1.2 billion deal to bolster its network analytics and visibility tools for telecoms, hyperscalers, and enterprises. “The deal, which will transfer all of Ziff Davis’s Connectivity division to Accenture, includes Ookla’s Speedtest, Ekahau, and RootMetrics,” notes The Register reports:
“Modern networks have evolved from simple infrastructure into business-critical platforms,” said Accenture CEO Julie Sweet in a canned statement. “Without the ability to measure performance, organizations cannot optimize experience, revenue, or security.” Ookla is meant to let them do just that.

Data captured at the network and device layer are used to enhance fraud prevention in banking, smart homes monitoring, and traffic optimization in retail, Accenture said. Ookla’s platform, which lets user’s test their own connectivity speed, captures more than 1,000 attributes per test, and provides the foundation for those analytics, Accenture said.

India’s Top Court Angry After Junior Judge Cites Fake AI-Generated Orders

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from the BBC:
India’s Supreme Court has threatened legal consequences after a judge was found to have adjudicated on a property dispute using fake judgements generated by artificial intelligence. The top court, which was responding to an appeal by the defendants, will now examine the ruling given by the lower court in the southern state of Andhra Pradesh. The Supreme Court called the case a matter of “institutional concern” and said fake AI-generated judgements had “a direct bearing on integrity of adjudicatory process.”

[…] Coming down sternly against the fake judgements, the top court last Friday stayed the lower court’s order on the property dispute. It said the use of AI while making judgements was not simply “an error in decision making” but an act of “misconduct.” “This case assumes considerable institutional concern, not because of the decision that was taken on the merits of the case, but about the process of adjudication and determination,” the top court said. The court said it would examine the case in more detail and issued notices to the country’s Attorney and Solicitor General, as well as the Bar Council of India.

dependence

By SumDog • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
The thing that bothers me so much right now is the absolutely insane amount of dependence people have on these random word machines. I know people who use them instead of search engines, or they’ll read the generated results at the top of Google/DDG as if they’re fact without question. There is little literacy onto how models really work, and even for developers who should know better, they still see the current generation of machines similar to the movie “Her” than the semi-deterministic feedback systems they truly are.

The trust people put into these things is frightening. If it isn’t for the right attorney or judge that digs through and discovers these completely randomly generated court cases, cases like this could be made entirely with incorrect standing and precedent. There are people who do not use chatbots at all, or in limited capacity to generate images, video and segments of code they clean up. There are others who use them for everything from recipes to fitness advice to generating entire applications they submit for code review without manually reviewing and fixing the generation to match their code style.

When the crunch hits the LLM industry, some of these people will easily shell out $500/month to keep their bots, and it will require that much to keep some of these companies afloat. The lack of decent off-line models is troubling. Some companies will refuse to shell out the $1k~$2k/employee increases I think we’re likely to see. This is a disaster brewing, and we’re not ready as a society to deal with it.

Since we’re finding some of these models can reproduce entire chapters of Harry Potter with 95% of the original, I can only imagine the actual models used by Anthropic/OpenAI are probably 400GB ~ 1TB in size. They’re not telling us what’s really in these models. I suspect they are huge, and at some point, it just turns into lossly JPEG/mp3 compression with weird realistic artifacts.

Just highlights what we all knew already

By nedlohs • Score: 3 Thread

Clearly the only way that happens is if you have already made up your mind and just want to find some justification for it.

Which is expected from the lawyers - they are trying to win the case for their side, obviously they are looking to find evidence and precedent for what they want. If they use an genAI tool it will gladly make something up for them.

But the judge - they’re supposed to be looking at precedent to guide them, not making up their mind and then finding prior cases that agree with them (and again a genAI tool will gladly make some fiction for them).

Apple Launches New M5 Chips, MacBook Pro, and First New Monitors In Years

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Today, Apple updated the MacBook Pro and MacBook Air with support for its new M5 chips. It also unveiled a pair of all-new Studio Display XDR monitors. Longtime Slashdot reader jizmonkey shares details about the M5 Pro and M5 Max chips, which look to be fairly major updates from the previous generation:
Apple announced its newest CPUs today, which it claims has the fastest single-threaded performance in the world. Both the M5 Pro and M5 Max have eighteen-core designs, versus twelve or fourteen in the M4 Pro and fourteen or sixteen in the M4 Max. However, the number of higher-performing cores has been reduced significantly. In the older M4 designs, the chips had eight, ten, or twelve “performance” cores and four “efficiency” cores. In the M5 design, there are now only six higher-performing cores (now called “super” cores) and twelve lower-performing cores (now called “performance” cores). [Apple positions this “reduction” as a redesigned architecture with new core types.] The maximum amount of RAM remains the same at 128GB for the M5 Max (64GB for the M5 Pro), and GPU performance has increased. [The M5 Pro features up to a 20-core GPU, while the M5 Max scales up to 40 cores, each equipped with a Neural Accelerator. Apple also says the new architecture delivers over 4x peak GPU compute for AI compared to the previous generation, along with up to 35 percent faster performance in ray-traced graphics workloads.] Laptops with the new chips are available to order starting tomorrow and will be delivered starting March 11.
As for the new XDR monitors, MacRumors highlights some of the key features in its reporting:
Apple today introduced an all-new Studio Display XDR monitor with a 27-inch screen, mini-LED backlighting, 5K resolution, peak brightness of 2,000 nits for HDR content, up to a 120Hz refresh rate, Thunderbolt 5, and more. The new Studio Display XDR replaces Apple’s former Pro Display XDR, which has been discontinued. Going forward, there are now two Studio Display models.

Both new Studio Display models have the same overall design as the original model. Both models have a 12-megapixel Center Stage camera, but it now supports Desk View on the new models. Both models also feature an upgraded six-speaker system, with Apple advertising “30 percent deeper bass” compared to the previous model. Only the higher-end Studio Display XDR received a 120Hz refresh rate, mini-LED backlighting, increased brightness, and faster 140W pass-through charging. The regular Studio Display still has a 60Hz refresh rate and up to 600 nits of brightness. Both models have 27-inch displays with a 5K resolution.

The new Studio Displays can be pre-ordered starting Wednesday, March 4, ahead of a Wednesday, March 11 launch. In the U.S., the regular Studio Display continues to start at $1,599, while the Studio Display XDR starts at $3,299.

Computers uses newer chips, film at 11

By UnknowingFool • Score: 4, Informative Thread
So nothing exciting other than incremental updates that consumers should expect.

Re:Computers uses newer chips, film at 11

By UnknowingFool • Score: 4, Informative Thread

“No new products? Greedy bastards can’t even be bothered to keep up with the latest tech.”

I clearly didn’t say that. I said there was “nothing exciting other than incremental updates”.

“Latest tech and nothing revolutionary? Greedy bastards just want to keep you on the upgrade train.”

I also didn’t say that. How you got from “nothing exciting” to “Greedy bastards” is quite the leap.

27” 5K?

By MeNeXT • Score: 3 Thread

You would think that we would have moved to larger formats by now. I have an 55” 8K with a 32” 4K as a secondary monitor with multiple desktops. I would say a 27” 5K monitor would feel cluttered. It reminds me of working in a cubicle.

AI-Generated Art Can’t Be Copyrighted After Supreme Court Declines To Review the Rule

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
The Supreme Court of the United States declined to review a case challenging the U.S. Copyright Office’s stance that AI-generated works lack the required human authorship for copyright protection, leaving lower court rulings intact. The Verge reports:
The Monday decision comes after Stephen Thaler, a computer scientist from Missouri, appealed a court’s decision to uphold a ruling that found AI-generated art can’t be copyrighted. In 2019, the U.S. Copyright Office rejected Thaler’s request to copyright an image, called A Recent Entrance to Paradise, on behalf of an algorithm he created. The Copyright Office reviewed the decision in 2022 and determined that the image doesn’t include “human authorship,” disqualifying it from copyright protection.

After Thaler appealed the decision, U.S. District Court Judge Beryl A. Howell ruled in 2023 that “human authorship is a bedrock requirement of copyright.” That ruling was later upheld in 2025 by a federal appeals court in Washington, DC. As reported by Reuters, Thaler asked the Supreme Court to review the ruling in October 2025, arguing it “created a chilling effect on anyone else considering using AI creatively.”
The U.S. federal circuit court also determined that AI systems can’t patent inventions because they aren’t human, which the U.S. Patent Office reaffirmed in 2024 with new guidance. The UK Supreme Court made a similar determination.

What does this mean for AI-Generated software?

By WimBo • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Is AI generated software not protected by default?

Re:Adverts and films?

By Junta • Score: 5, Informative Thread

I think the catch is that you have to:
- Be able to prove that the subject is AI generated
- That you have to be able to extricate the AI output from any human curated elements

Here it was easy as the person said the work was wholly generated. Once you have it as merely part of a whole, it becomes difficult.

God, can people PLEASE report correctly…

By Rei • Score: 5, Informative Thread

… on AI and copyright?

“A Recent Entrance to Paradise” was rejected because it had no human authorship. There was - by design - no human input, no prompt, not even human control (to the degree possible) over the training.

The actual USPTO stance on AI is that AI is a tool, and tools can’t hold copyright (nor can animals - only humans). The ability to gain copyright protection on a work is based on human creative endeavour regardless of what tools are used. If the amount of human creative input is sub-threshold, then the result cannot have any copyright protection, but if the human creative work is above threshold, then it can, on the basis of the creative things that the human did. Note that even selection of outputs from a large output set can (depending on the circumstances) qualify; curation is copyrightable. The USPTO specifically states as much.

I myself hold a copyright on a work made with the use of AI tools. Officially registered with the USPTO (I went with them even though I don’t live there because they have an official registry and tend to be precedent-setting). I fully disclosed the use of AI (what it did vs. what I did) in my application. You absolutely can copyright works made with AI tools. But (A) the tool cannot hold the copyright, and (B) you have to have done more than just write “a cute puppy” or whatnot and post the first thing that comes up. You have to have done a threshold amount of creative work, and that threshold creative work becomes the basis for protection. Use of AI tools does not disqualify a work from protection.

Re:Adverts and films?

By sg_oneill • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Generally the AI generated portion cant be. Ie if you generative fill on a photoshop design you’ve been working on, you can copyright the whole design, but the AI generated fill part, itsn’t necessarily covered.

I suspect the fine details arent fully worked out in precedent yet, but they’ll get there.

This is the best possible outcome. You cant just fire people and replace them with AI if you want IP. If I make an advertisement and want copyright it’ll need at least SOME work done by humans. If you want music you can own and generate royalties from, it’ll need humans in there somewhere. This protects human labour while still letting these tools be out there to *assist*.

Re:Adverts and films?

By alvinrod • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
The problem is that if the AI is good enough the humans will be stooges who exist solely to allow the works to qualify for copyright protections. They need not be talented artists or masters of their craft. If it’s a job that literally anyone can do, expect the wages to be commensurate to that fact.

The absolute best case is that regular people can use these tools to make something on a similar level to that of major studios. That’s the only way that actual creatives are getting any significant money out of this. As much as we’d all love to see the major studios and labels fail and disappear, don’t expect them to go quietly. Eventually laws will be made to govern the use of this technology and coincidentally they will be written to benefit the entrenched players.

ChatGPT Uninstalls Surged By 295% After Pentagon Deal

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
After OpenAI announced a partnership with the U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. uninstalls of ChatGPT surged 295% in a single day. Meanwhile, rival Anthropic “gained enough popularity to earn the number one spot on the App Store’s Top Free Apps leaderboard,” reports Engadget. TechCrunch reports:
This data, which comes from market intelligence provider Sensor Tower, represents a sizable increase compared with ChatGPT’s typical day-over-day uninstall rate of 9%, as measured over the past 30 days. […] In addition, ChatGPT’s download growth was impacted by the news of its DoD partnership, with its U.S. downloads dropping by 13% day-over-day on Saturday, shortly after the news of its deal went public. Those downloads continued to fall on Sunday, when they were down by 5% day-over-day. (Before the partnership was announced, the app’s downloads had grown 14% day-over-day on Friday.)

[…] Consumers are also sharing their opinions about OpenAI’s deal in the app’s ratings, where 1-star reviews for ChatGPT surged 775% on Saturday, then grew 100% day-over-day on Sunday, Sensor Tower said. Five-star reviews declined during the same period, dropping by 50%. Other third-party data providers back up Sensor Tower’s findings.

The Shitty Comic Book Writers Need a Break

By nightflameauto • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Every time I think about the leaders in the AI sphere I get weird sixties/seventies comic book vibes.

“We need some names for villains promoting AI and robots over humans.”

“How about Musk? Because nerds are smelly!”

“Right, that’s great. Anyone else?”

“Alt-man? Because he’s looking for an alternative to man?”

“Little on the nose, but we’ll run with it. Now, let’s try to get something a little less obvious.”

“Theil! Sounds like steal! As in stealing the souls of humanity!”

“Damn, man. That’s some great alliterative license.”

“Bezos. We’ll reveal somewhere down the line it’s Beelzebub playing human.”

“Fantastic!”

“Nadella! Like, ‘no deal’ said really fast!”

“This brainstorming session is beyond my expectations!”

Re:Pointless gesture

By jd • Score: 5, Informative Thread

The gangs in the UK have guns. They predominantly use them against other armed gangs and armed security guards. It’s extremely rare that bystanders get shot, and most of the time it’s in crossfire. The last school shooting isn’t in living memory for many in Britain. British pop culture often focuses on defusing situations if possible, then using tactical, precision force should that fail. Precisely the same focus used by the British police and, more often than not, the British armed forces.

America has three to four mass shootings A DAY, and school shootings are just another week. American pop culture focuses on slaughtering everyone in the vicinity, as do the US police and US armed forces.

This tells me everything I need to know about those who has the unhealthy relationship to violent solutions.

Don’t waste my time on cutesy theories and soundbites. Either you can offer actual evidence for your position or you cannot. And it is obvious from your reliance on cutesy theories and soundbites that you cannot.

As for “advanced weapons”, the US has blown up a primary school in Iran, blew up a hospital in Afghanistan, and a civilian air raid shelter in Iraq. These “advanced weapons” are proving useless in Ukraine, as the Russians figured out over a weekend how to jam the guidance systems. Advanced crap is still crap.

Against this, the British have used aircraft with far less advanced weapons to blow up specific floors in specific buildings - something way way outside the capacity of the US. The day your “advanced weapons” in the hands of imbeciles can match crude weapons in the hands of actual experts is the day you get to tell us about these “advanced weapons”.

Re: What happened?

By wgoodman • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Campaign:
“No more forever wars!”
Yesterday:
“We have so many weapons that we could go to war forever!”

Re:i believed it’s called

By UnknowingFool • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Partially. I also think people are paranoid and in some cases have a right to be paranoid. Any partnership with the DoD may lead them to the conclusion that the DoD might have access to their data now. I would argue that the DoD probably already had access.

Re:Pointless gesture

By ArchieBunker • Score: 5, Informative Thread

The gun ownership laws in those countries is also VASTLY different. A boomer can’t waddle his ass into a McDonald’s carrying an AR-15 over there. Imagine being that scared to leave your house every day.

Hacked Tehran Traffic Cameras Fed Israeli Intelligence Before Strike On Khamenei

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader shares a CTech article with the caption: “A brilliantly executed operation.” From the report:
Years before the air strike that killed Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Israeli intelligence had been quietly mapping the daily rhythms of Tehran. According to reporting by the Financial Times (paywalled), nearly all of the Iranian capital’s traffic cameras had been hacked years earlier, their footage encrypted and transmitted to Israeli servers. One camera angle near Pasteur Street, close to Khamenei’s compound, allowed analysts to observe the routines of bodyguards and drivers: where they parked, when they arrived and whom they escorted. That data was fed into complex algorithms that built what intelligence officials call a “pattern of life,” detailed profiles including addresses, work schedules and, crucially, which senior officials were being protected and transported. The surveillance stream was one of hundreds feeding Israel’s intelligence system, which combines signals interception from Unit 8200, human assets recruited by the Mossad and large-scale data analysis by military intelligence.

When US and Israeli intelligence determined that Khamenei would attend a Saturday morning meeting at his compound, the opportunity was judged unusually favorable. Two people familiar with the operation told the FT that US intelligence provided confirmation from a human source that the meeting was proceeding as planned, a level of certainty required for a target of such magnitude. Israeli aircraft, reportedly airborne for hours, fired as many as 30 precision munitions. The strike was carried out in daylight, which the Israeli military said created tactical surprise despite heightened Iranian alertness. The Financial Times reports that the assassination was a political decision as much as a technological feat. Even during last year’s 12-day war, when Israeli strikes killed more than a dozen Iranian nuclear scientists and senior military officials and disabled air defences through cyber operations and drones, Israel did not attempt to kill Khamenei.

The capability to do so, however, had been built over decades. Former Mossad official Sima Shine told the FT that Israel’s strategic focus on Iran dates back to a 2001 directive from then-prime minister Ariel Sharon instructing intelligence chief Meir Dagan to make the Islamic Republic the priority target. What distinguishes the latest operation, according to the FT, is the scale of automation. Target tracking that once required painstaking visual confirmation has increasingly been handled by algorithm-driven systems parsing billions of data points. One person familiar with the process described it as an “assembly line with a single product: targets.”
Further reading: America Used Anthropic’s AI for Its Attack On Iran, One Day After Banning It

Re:In other news

By RJFerret • Score: 5, Informative Thread

If only they were traffic cams, the Flock surveillance scanners provide license plate tracking and/or facial recognition. They aren’t for monitoring traffic, they’re for searching an individual’s travels. They’ve been repeatedly used for stalking.
And they’ve been found to be woefully insecure.

Excellent example

By gweihir • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

This is an excellent example why even seemingly unimportant IT systems like traffic cameras or cheap webcams can have major security implications when hacked.

Re:But why?

By quonset • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Is anyone else puzzled about the logic behind hitting him now? Sure, there’s some amount of supremacy nerd ‘noone is beyond our reach’ wank value to targeting someone through the CCTV system; but why hand a fairly unpopular theocrat who is already old enough that succession planning is an urgent problem basically the most PR-friendly death imaginable at the same time as you provide his government with a plausible argument along the usual ‘need to take necessary measures during the current crisis’ lines?

That’s a more or less instant upgrade from ‘increasingly pathetic reactionary with questionable public support’ to ‘martyred by jews and international zionism’ for a guy who was otherwise not long on options for shoring up his popularity.

Because Israel said so. That’s all you need to know. Now Israel can play victim when someone does something to them, completely ignoring they’re the one who’s been attacking its neighbors for decades.

Re:But why?

By skam240 • Score: 4, Informative Thread

+ Israel tried multiple times to fix borders and make peace with Palestinian leaders

All while bulldozing the homes of Palestinians to build homes for Israeli’s. Meanwhile Israel was never offering all the land they seized from the Palestinians back and was very rarely offering full sovereignty so these were hardly good faith peace offers most of the time.

Re:War Powers Clause

By henni16 • Score: 4, Funny Thread

It’s probably not war, but a “special military operation”.

Amazon Cloud Unit’s Data Centers In UAE, Bahrain Damaged In Drone Strikes

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
sizzlinkitty shares a Reuters report detailing how drone strikes in the Middle East conflict with Iran damaged AWS data centers in the UAE and Bahrain, disrupting core cloud services and causing “prolonged” outages. Following the initial report, where Reuters said “objects” had triggered a fire at the data centers, the article was updated with additional information:
A strike on the UAE facility marks the first time a major U.S. tech company’s data center has been disrupted by military action. It raises questions around Big Tech’s pace of expansion in the region. “In the UAE, two of our facilities were directly struck, while in Bahrain, a drone strike in close proximity to one of our facilities caused physical impact to our infrastructure,” Amazon’s cloud unit Amazon Web Services (AWS) said in an update on its status page. “These strikes have caused structural damage, disrupted power delivery to our infrastructure, and in some cases required fire suppression activities that resulted in additional water damage,” AWS said. “We are working to restore full service availability as quickly as possible, though we expect recovery to be prolonged given the nature of the physical damage involved,” it added.

Financial institutions that use AWS services have been affected by the outage, one person with direct knowledge of the situation told Reuters, requesting anonymity because of the sensitivity of the matter. “Even as we work to restore these facilities, the ongoing conflict in the region means that the broader operating environment in the Middle East remains unpredictable,” AWS said. The AWS outage disrupted a dozen core cloud services and the company advised customers to back up critical data and shift operations to servers in unaffected AWS regions. Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank said its platforms and mobile app were unavailable due to a region-wide IT disruption, although it did not directly link the outage to the AWS incident.
“In previous conflicts, regional adversaries such as Iran and its proxies targeted pipelines, refineries, and oil fields in Gulf partner states. In the compute era, these actors could also target data centers, energy infrastructure supporting compute, and fiber chokepoints,” Washington-based think tank Center for Strategic and International Studies said last week.

Epstein-Iran War

By gtall • Score: 5, Funny Thread

After that Melania movie, Amazon deserves this.

The 19th Century Silent Film That First Captured a Robot Attack

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
The Library of Congress has restored Gugusse et l’Automate, an 1897 short by Georges Melies that likely features the first robot ever shown on film. Long thought lost, the reel was discovered in a box of decaying nitrate films donated from a Michigan family collection. NPR reports:
The film, which can be viewed on the Library of Congress’ website, depicts a child-sized robot clown who grows to the size of an adult and then attacks a human clown with a stick. The human then decimates the machine with a hammer.

In an Instagram post, Library of Congress moving image curator Jason Evans Groth said the film represents, “probably the first instance of a robot ever captured in a moving image.” (The word “robot” didn’t appear until 1921, when Czech dramatist Karel Capek coined it in his science fiction play R.U.R..)

“Today, many of us are worried about AI and robots,” said archivist and filmmaker Rick Prelinger, in an email to NPR. “Well, people were thinking about robots in 1897. Very little is new.”

1897? Way before that.

By Viol8 • Score: 3, Informative Thread

In Jewish folklore theres a non living creature called a Golem (yes , I imagine thats where Tolkein got the name from) which is made from the soil. Not strictly a robot but certainly shows people could imagine solid creatures (as opposed to spirits) that weren’t natural that could be created out of mundane substances.

Re:Robot? Really?

By Synonymous Homonym • Score: 4, Informative Thread

The movie was made circa thirty years before the word “robot” was even coined.

Yes, TFS mentions that.

It also looks more like an automata

The singular form is “automaton”; “automata” is plural, and is the name of the book on the subject by Heron of Alexandria (circa 1st century).

Robots are automata.

The International Standards Organisation defines robots as programmable machines with at least three degrees of freedom. That falls within the scope of Heron’s automata.

Around the 16th century, when Heron’s book was translated into Italian, androids (automata that looked like people, what today we might call animatronics, or puppets) became popular with show people. Those who built and operated them were known as necromancers. (Although at least one Christ-shaped temple machine was in operation since the late middle ages.)

The word “robot” is younger, of course, as the fine summary mentions, and in Capek’s play it didn’t refer to automata, but rather to mass-produced variants of Frankenstein’s creature. (From the book, not the Hammer Films adaptation, which is very different, and also quite a bit later.) In his books, Isaac Asimov distinguished between androids (made from organic tissue like Frankenstein’s creature and Capek’s robots) and robots (ambulatory positronic computers, sometimes humaniform).

The Golem of Prague also perfectly fits the description of a robot, although it is centuries older than the word.
(The word “golem” meant someone who does menial tasks. That particular golem happened to have been a programmable machine, made from clay in an imitation of the story of Genesis, so a sophisticated form of necromancy. Although there is no evidence that the story isn’t science fiction.)

There’s an even older story from China, about a puppet that is so human-like that the king doesn’t believe that it isn’t a human, until the creator dismantles his work to prove it, destroying it in the process.

Going further back, Hesiod describes the Greek god Hephaistos (Vulkan in the Roman adaptation) as creating different kinds of automata, including tables that move around by themselves, and even a sex bot made from gold. (The story of Pygmalion probably doesn’t count, it’s just about a life-like statue that miraculously comes to life.)

Thats no hammer

By ArchieBunker • Score: 4, Informative Thread

The actual movie a minute long so feel free to watch. The robot is taken down by a giant cartoon style mallet.

Superagers’ ‘Secret Ingredient’ May Be the Growth of New Brain Cells

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
alternative_right shares a report from ScienceAlert:
According to a study of 38 adult human brains donated to science, superagers — people who retain exceptional memory as they age — have roughly twice as many immature neurons as their peers who age more typically. Moreover, people with Alzheimer’s disease show a marked reduction in neurogenesis compared to a normal baseline. […]

Led by researchers at the University of Illinois Chicago, the team set out to examine a variety of postmortem hippocampal tissue samples to see if they could identify markers of neurogenesis — and if different groups had any notable differences. The brain samples were donated from five groups: eight healthy young adults, aged between 20 and 40; eight healthy agers, aged between 60 and 93; six superagers, aged between 86 and 100; six individuals with preclinical Alzheimer’s pathology, aged between 80 and 94; and 10 individuals with an Alzheimer’s diagnosis, aged between 70 and 93. The young healthy adult brain tissue was first analyzed to establish the neurogenesis pathways in the adult brain. Then, they analyzed 355,997 individual cell nuclei isolated from the hippocampus, searching for three different stages of cell development: Stem cells, which can develop into neurons; neuroblasts, which are stem cells in the process of that development; and immature neurons, on the verge of functionality. The results were striking.

“Superagers had twice the neurogenesis of the other healthy older adults,” [says neuroscientist Orly Lazarov of the University of Illinois Chicago]. “Something in their brains enables them to maintain a superior memory. I believe hippocampal neurogenesis is the secret ingredient, and the data support that.” That’s an interesting result on its own, but the data from the individuals with preclinical Alzheimer’s pathology and Alzheimer’s diagnoses is where the real meat of the study sits. In the preclinical group, subtle molecular changes hinted that the system supporting new neuron growth was beginning to falter. In the Alzheimer’s group, a clear drop in immature neurons was evident. A genetic analysis of the nuclei also showed that superager neural cells have increased gene activity linked to stronger synaptic connections, greater plasticity, and brain-derived neurotrophic factor, a critical protein for neural survival, growth, and maintenance. Taken together, these three things can be interpreted as resilience.
The research has been published in the journal Nature.

Al-zheimers

By gtall • Score: 4 Thread

Use it or lose it. If you let your brain atrophy by letting AI do your “thinking” for you, you will become mentally incompetent. Companies and organizations diving in the deep end of AI are cutting their own throats.

I came here looking for the obvious joke

By shanen • Score: 3 Thread

But I can’t remember what it was.

Iowa County Rolls Out Extensive Zoning Rules For Data Centers

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Linn County, Iowa has adopted what may be one of the nation’s strictest local zoning ordinances for data centers, requiring detailed water studies, formal water-use agreements, 1,000-foot residential setbacks, noise and light limits, and infrastructure compensation. “But seated beneath a van-sized American flag hanging from the rafters of the drafty Palo Community Center gymnasium, residents asked for even stronger protections,” reports Inside Climate News. “One by one, they approached the microphone at the front of the gym to voice concerns about water use, electricity rates, light pollution, the impacts of low-frequency noise on livestock, and the county’s ability to enforce the terms of the ordinance. Some, including Dorothy Landt of Palo, called for a complete moratorium on new data center development.”

Landt asked: “Why has Linn County, Iowa, become a dumping ground for soon-to-be obsolete technology that spoils our landscape and robs us of our resources? While I admire the efforts of the Board of Supervisors to propose a data center ordinance, I would prefer to see all future data centers banned from Linn County.” From the report:
The county is already home to two major data center projects, operated by Google and QTS. Both are located in Cedar Rapids, Iowa’s second-largest city, and are therefore subject to its laws. The new ordinance would apply only to unincorporated areas of the county, which make up more than two-thirds of its geographic footprint. […] In drafting the ordinance, [Charlie Nichols, director of planning and development for Linn County] and his staff drew on the experiences of communities nationwide, meeting with local government officials in regions that have seen massive booms in data center development, including several counties in northern Virginia, the “data center capital of the world.”

As data center development balloons, many communities that initially zoned the operations as warehouses or standard commercial users are abandoning that practice, Nichols noted. The extreme energy and water demands of data centers simply cannot be accounted for by existing zoning frameworks, he said. “These are generational uses with generational infrastructure impacts, and treating them as a normal warehouse or normal commercial user is just not working.” […] The Linn County, Iowa, ordinance goes one step further than tightening existing zoning rules. Instead, it creates a new, exclusive-use zoning district for data centers, granting county officials the power to set specific application requirements and development standards for projects. No other counties in the state have introduced similar zoning requirements, said Nichols. In fact, few jurisdictions nationwide have. […]

From its first reading to final adoption, the ordinance has expanded to include language setting light pollution standards, requiring a waste management plan, including the Iowa DNR in the water-use agreement to address potential well interference issues and requiring an applicant-led public meeting before any zoning commission meetings. “I am very confident that no ordinance for data centers in Iowa is asking for more information or asking for more requirements to be met than our ordinance right now,” said Nichols at the final reading. The Cedar Rapids Metro Economic Alliance has said that it strongly supports current and future data center development in the area. The new ordinance is not an effective moratorium, Nichols said. He said he “strongly believes” that a data center can be built within the adopted framework.

Re:The most shocking part…

By backslashdot • Score: 4, Funny Thread

Did you reckon they go hunting for corn without flashlights?

Honestly it could be easier

By aaarrrgggh • Score: 5, Informative Thread

If you want to force out data centers, make any utility connections over 5MW enter a 20-year power purchase agreement with all infrastructure costs paid up front. Do the same for water. Give the city/county the power to shut off said utilities and block access to the facility if they create a public nuisance

Re:So space

By r1348 • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Here, have a sobering dose of reality: https://taranis.ie/datacenters…

Re:1000 feet is no where far enough

By pixelpusher220 • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

I live 600 ft from an Amazon DC in Northern VA. There will be FOURTEEN DC complexes within 1/4 mile of our development.

It ain’t fun.

This Business Insider video has a really good example of the sound https://www.youtube.com/watch?…

One thing that makes this really hard is that sound waves, like water waves, bounce. During the last big snow, it changed the sound profile so much that I could literally feel my hardwood floor vibrate. Normally it’s low end grunt noise but that was even lower.

Because of this, regulations need to ‘over protect’ residential areas, because literally every home will have a unique sound level. Unfortunately, that’s going to be a hard sell against Million$ in DC political money.

And worse, *multiple* DCs nearby, the sound is additive. Two 50 db speakers produce more than 50 db in volume. If the ordinance is 55 and the additive is 57 - who do you blame? In a river, we measure each polluter at the source - So far, getting sound meters installed AT the DC property lines has been a no go.

It doesn’t do any good at county level

By rsilvergun • Score: 3 Thread
The AI companies just buy off the state legislature to overrule local laws.

The reason the elites don’t like federal government is that it requires so much consensus to build a federal government that it tends to do a pretty good job protecting people’s civil rights and can’t easily be bought off. Don’t get me wrong it can be bought it just can’t be done easily because it’s just too much money involved at the national level.

But if you go all the way down to the county level the Epstein class doesn’t like that because there is too many individuals to deal with and too many to buy off.

What they like is the state level. Small enough to manage but not so numerous they can’t just buy everything.

When you hear the phrase small enough to drown in a bathtub that’s what they mean.

British Columbia To End Time Changes, Adopt Year-Round Daylight Time

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from CBC.ca:
The B.C. government says this Sunday will be the last time British Columbians have to change their clocks. The province will be permanently adopting daylight time and the March 8 “spring forward” will be the last time change, Premier David Eby announced Monday. “We are done waiting. British Columbia is going to change our clocks just one more time — and then never again,” Eby said. Residents will have eight months to prepare for Nov. 1, 2026, when the clocks would have been turned back one hour, but will now remain the same. B.C.‘s new time zone will be called “Pacific Time,” according to the province.
Further reading: Permanent Standard Time Could Cut Strokes, Obesity Among Americans

Re:Americans, you want the same thing?

By locater16 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Cheeto man literally tried and failed a year ago. There’s a congressional law that mandates any state that starts using daylight savings time cannot legally stop without permission, and Congress is filled with so many dusty liches that they refuse to repeal this law despite overwhelming popularity to do so because their literally fossilized brains cannot comprehend doing the jobs they were chosen to do.

America’s problems go far deeper than dementia Hitler, the two houses of Congress are nothing but petty robbers so old they think walking on two legs is a modern invention, and it has a populace so disconnected and uncaring about how the government works or what it does they keep re-electing these paleozoic cretins indefinitely. Cheeto man is just the apotheosis of glitzy, substanceless drooling uncaringness that is the United States.

Re:Envy

By ClickOnThis • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Friendly tip: don’t say anything about the “51st state” around Canadians. Not even if you’re joking. It’s uncool, and one of the big reasons Canadians are boycotting the USA right now as a travel destination, and avoiding USA products in stores.

Re:Americans, you want the same thing?

By caseih • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I am all for ending the time changing, but I’m strongly opposed to daylight savings time year round. Stick with standard time.

DST has never had anything to do with farmers. I’m not sure where that myth got started. I first originated during WWI as a way to save fuel, although I don’t think it ever saved anything.

Re:Permanently daylight savings?

By Richard_at_work • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Sounds like you want to go back to the concept of “local time for local people”, which existed before railways required common timekeeping for the entirety of a route… Noon was at different times of the day for east-west services…

There are reasons why “local time for local people” didnt work then for anything more than a single town or village, and those reasons are still valid now.

Re:Screw timezones and use Zulu.

By AmiMoJo • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Having a single timezone avoids issues with things like broadcast times depending on where you are, or having to change your clocks as your train/flight progresses. If it says your high speed train will arrive at 2 PM, it will arrive at 2 PM, not 2 PM local time 4 PM destination time. You know exactly how long it will take to get there.

China isn’t the only country that does it. Japan has a single timezone for the whole country, for example.

Most countries don’t have DST either.

Apple Might Use Google Servers To Store Data For Its Upgraded AI Siri

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Apple has reportedly asked Google to look into “seting up servers” for a Gemini-powered upgrade to Siri that meets Apple’s privacy standards. The Verge reports:
Apple had already announced in January that Google’s Gemini AI models would help power the upgraded version of Siri it delayed last year, but The Information’s report indicates Apple might lean even more on Google so it can catch up in AI.

The original partnership announcement said that “the next generation of Apple Foundation Models will be based on Google’s Gemini models and cloud technology,” and that the models would “help power future Apple Intelligence features,” including “a more personalized Siri.” While the announcement noted that Apple Intelligence would “continue to run on Apple devices and Private Cloud Compute,” it didn’t specify if the new Siri would run on Google’s cloud.
Apple’s Private Cloud Compute is not only underpowered but it’s also underutilized in its current state, notes 9to5Mac, “with the company only using about 10% of its capacity on average, leading to some already-manufactured Apple servers to be sitting dormant on warehouse shelves.”

HBO Max and Paramount+ To Merge Into One Streaming Service

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Paramount Skydance plans to combine HBO Max and Paramount+ into a single streaming platform following its acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery. “As we said, we do plan to put the two services together, which today gives us a little over 200 million direct-to-consumer subscribers,” said David Ellison, the company’s CEO. “We think that really positions us to compete with the leaders in the space.” The deal still needs regulatory approval. The Washington Post reports:
He added that Paramount didn’t want to make changes to the HBO brand. “Our viewpoint is HBO should stay HBO,” Ellison said, noting that his favorite HBO product is “Game of Thrones.” If Justice Department regulators allow the deal to go through, it would place recent HBO Max hits, such as “The Pitt” and “A Knight of the Seven Kingdoms,” alongside Paramount offerings including “South Park” and “Yellowstone.” “They built a phenomenal brand,” he said. “They are a leader in the space, and we just want them to continue doing more of it.”

The deal to buy Warner Bros., valued at about $110 billion, will almost surely attract regulatory scrutiny from the Justice Department because — without divestments — it places major swaths of the film, television and news industries under one roof: Warner Bros. and Paramount studios, HBO Max and Paramount+, and CBS and CNN would all have the same parent company. Ellison expressed confidence on the call that the deal wouldn’t face hurdles with regulators.

Please don’t use Paramount+ Platform

By SeeManRun • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Really hoping they don’t use the Paramount+ platform going forward. It is by far the worst performing streaming application I have experienced. I have not used HBO Max, but it cannot be as bad as Paramount+. They should hire some programmers and make a proper application that runs quickly on the devices that run it. There should be nothing too complex about browsing lists and surfacing data quickly. Paramount+ is a failure and really frustrating to use compared to every other service, Netflix and Apple+ being the best in my opinion.

Or more likely..

By Vegan Cyclist • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

“will almost surely attract regulatory scrutiny from the Justice Department”

Seems much more likely it will almost surely attract luxurious gifts of cash to Trump and his associates.

Maybe a new StreamCoin ponzi?

This is the better alternative

By thecombatwombat • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

I gave up on streaming years ago and I don’t think this will get me to go back.

But in terms of consolidation being bad for consumers, this does seem much, much, much better than Netflix buying HBO to me. If Netflix had bought HBO, it would be a year tops until Disney or Amazon bought Paramount.

A weird silver lining I haven’t seen discussed, is Paramount and Waner Brothers both still put stuff out on physical media. You can buy DVDs of their shows and media, and I figured that would stop under Netflix, but hopefully it will continue for a while at least now.

Yay! We’re headed back to cable!

By Pascoea • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
I, for one, can’t wait to shell out $150/month for my new DisflixWarneluParamax+ streaming service!

Re: PatriOracle

By CaptQuark • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

it places major swaths of the film, television and news industries under one roof: Warner Bros. and Paramount studios, HBO Max and Paramount+, and CBS and CNN would all have the same parent company.

I wouldn’t be opposed to this merger as long as they divested themselves of CBS and CNN before approval. News organizations should not be consolidated to the point that we have no independent news available.

Concentrating all the news organizations under one editorial board presents the opportunity for one person’s opinion becoming the only news that is broadcast, either right-leaning or left-leaning. We don’t want all news organizations to become either clones of MSNBC or Fox News with nothing in between.

Charter Gets FCC Permission To Buy Cox, Become Largest ISP In the US

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica:
Charter Communications, operator of the Spectrum cable brand, has obtained Federal Communications Commission permission to buy Cox and surpass Comcast as the country’s largest home Internet service provider. Charter has 29.7 million residential and business Internet customers compared to Comcast’s 31.26 million. Buying Cox will give Charter another 5.9 million Internet customers. The FCC approved the deal on Friday, but the companies still need Justice Department approval and sign-offs from states including California and New York.

Opponents of Charter’s $34.5 billion acquisition told the FCC that eliminating Cox as an independent entity will make it easier for Charter and Comcast to raise prices. But the FCC dismissed those concerns on the grounds that Charter and Cox don’t compete directly against each other in the vast majority of their territories.

FCC Chairman Brendan Carr’s primary demand from companies seeking to merge has been to eliminate diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs and policies. In a press release (PDF), the Carr-led FCC said that “Charter has committed to new safeguards to protect against DEI discrimination,” and that Charter’s network-expansion plans will bring “faster broadband and lower prices” to rural areas. The merger was approved one day after Charter sent a letter to Carr outlining its actions to end DEI. Charter offers broadband and cable service in 41 states, while Cox does so in 18 states.

We need more, smaller ISPs. Not big ones.

By MikeDataLink • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Where I live there is one ISP. Spectrum. The cost of 1Gbit service is $129 a month. The service sucks. It’s always having outages.

Where my brother lives, they have both AT&T and Spectrum. Both carries offer internet for $59 a month to his house.

We need more ISPs. More competition. Less mergers.

The biggest problem is us

By wakeboarder • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Because we never complain, and the company lawyers do. If more people would get involved then they wouldn’t improve these mergers, when the only people that are speaking are lawywers then they’ll push the merger through. Any consumer could recognize that this is going to be bad for them. Mergers never pass on savings to consumers.

Re:We need more, smaller ISPs. Not big ones.

By jacks smirking reven • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Doubt it, their operating costs are always going to be higher than cables laying in the ground, it will always have lesser total capacity, the latency, even if good, will always be higher and it will always be subject to more interference issues.

The idea that Starlink is anything close to a replacement for a dedicated fiber line is a pipe dream. It can both be a marvel of technology with amazing capabilities and providing amazing service for people who need it and still not be comparable to dedicated fiber and that’s OK, these things do not compete, they complement eachother.

The idea it just has to be a replacement is Musk making his personal insecurities everyone elses problem yet again.

And guess what happens next

By quonset • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Dear Customer,

As we merge our operations with Cox Communicats, adjustments will need to be made to our billing practices. Starting on April 1, 2026, there will be an additional $25 integration fee added to your bill. This will continue for a period of six months after which this fee will be added to your bill on a permanent basis.

This fee will allow us to continue to providing you with the best service possible as we work to merge our operations. Additional fees may be necessary in the near future.

If you wish to dispute this fee, tough shit. There’s no one else in your area.

Sincerely,

Charter Communications

Re:We need more, smaller ISPs. Not big ones.

By sarren1901 • Score: 5, Informative Thread

I just got Starlink as it’s come down to my only option and it cost $120 per month, no additional taxes, fees or equipment rentals. They actually sent me a Starlink kit (receiver, outdoor ethernet 50’, and a router with a power cord. If it gets damaged or broken, I buy it. When I’m done with the service, I return the used equipment free and clear. I may have to pay for return shipping but I’m not really concerned and will deal with that hopefully a very long time from now.

I just did a speedtest.net test and am getting about 230/30 connection. Now I am on wifi entirely as I’ve decided not to drag wires around the home and cannot make any changes otherwise. I think the quoted speed on the website says up to 300mb but that’s ideal, perfection conditions I’m thinking. Considering my rather slow 10mb hotspot connection is patchy at best in this location, I’m just happy to have Starlink as an option. It was kind of the fall back plan otherwise I would not live where I am.

The kit arrived in about a week though they will say up to two weeks for shipping. You just use your cellphone and an app to position the receiver. It’s all very simple and pretty cool at the same time. You definitely need a clear view for optimal performance, which I’m lucky to have.

Their website also claims to have cheaper deals for lower speeds, but the only one offered to my address in the San Diego County region was of course the $120. I’d of actually gone with half the speed, as before I moved here I was paying Cox $52.01 a month for 100/??up. It more then met all my needs.