Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Apple Is Bringing Age Verification To Texas This Week
  2. Google Ordered To Put Clearer Links In AI Search, Let UK Publishers Opt Out
  3. NASA Says Goodbye to Its Longtime Mars MAVEN Mission
  4. Amazon’s New Stargate Series Is Officially Dead
  5. Demand Is Booming For New No Tech, Repairable Tractor
  6. Fedora Linux 43 Exposes 20-Year-Old Microsoft Outlook Security Failure
  7. EU Plots To Abandon US Tech
  8. MacBook Neo is So Popular That Apple Reportedly Doubled Production
  9. Google Launches ‘Gemma 4 12B’ AI Model That Can Run On Your Laptop
  10. Google Shares Fitbit Air Blueprints So Anyone Can 3D-Print Accessories
  11. Microsoft Plans Linux Tools, RTX Spark Desktop For Windows Devs
  12. Meta Workers Can Opt Out of Workplace Tracking for Up to 30 Minutes
  13. Microsoft Claims New Quantum Chip 1,000 Times Better Than Before
  14. Android Gets Fake Call Detection That Uses RCS
  15. Thanks To Robots, Ukraine Is Now Talking About Winning, Not Just Surviving

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Apple Is Bringing Age Verification To Texas This Week

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
joshuark shares a report from The Verge:
Apple will introduce age verification in the App Store for users in Texas starting on Thursday, June 4th. The move, as spotted by MacRumors, comes just days after a federal appeals court allowed Texas’ App Store Accountability Act to go into effect while a lawsuit against it proceeds. People in Texas who are creating a new Apple account will need to verify they’re over 18 using a credit card or government ID. Apple may also automatically verify users’ age using the age of their account and whether they have a credit card on file.

Despite Apple’s attempts to push back on app store-level age verification, the company has announced plans to implement age checks to comply with laws in places like Utah, Louisiana, Brazil, Australia, Singapore, and the UK. Google is required to make similar changes to the Play Store and is also introducing age-checking tools for developers. Last December, a judge blocked the App Store Accountability Act (SB 2420) from taking effect, but an appeals court has now reversed this decision — at least while the court figures out whether the law is constitutional. Even if this law gets struck down in Texas, a federal version with the same name is still making its way through Congress and could impose age verification at the app store nationwide.

Google Ordered To Put Clearer Links In AI Search, Let UK Publishers Opt Out

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica:
UK regulators today ordered (PDF) Google to put clearer attributions and links to publishers’ content in its AI-generated search features. The UK’s Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) also said Google must give publishers a way to opt out of AI features in search. “In a world first, publishers will now have effective tools to prevent their content being used to power AI features in search, such as AI Overviews,” the CMA said today. “This will put publishers, like news organizations, in a stronger position to negotiate content deals with Google. To boost consumer trust, Google is also now required to make sure that publisher content is properly attributed, using clear links, in AI-generated search results.”

The CMA ruled that Google may not penalize publishers for opting out of AI, meaning that Google can’t downrank opted-out publishers in general search results. The CMA said Google will have nine months to comply with all requirements but that the agency “expects important parts of the controls to become available to publishers well before that deadline. Google will also be required to submit and publish compliance reports, supported by key data and metrics, explaining changes it has made and how it has complied.” […] The CMA applied the rules to Google after determining that it has “strategic market status” in general search services, and has ongoing investigations into Apple and Microsoft. Google today said it will comply with the CMA decision.
The News Media Association, a trade group in the UK, said that “the legally enforceable Conduct Requirements for Google Search published today are a significant step towards leveling the playing field and building a fair, transparent digital economy where premium content is properly respected and fairly compensated.” The group called on the UK to implement “robust enforcement.”

NASA Says Goodbye to Its Longtime Mars MAVEN Mission

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
NASA has officially ended the MAVEN mission after the Mars orbiter stopped responding in December, apparently after an unexpected spin drained its batteries and knocked out communications. Launched in 2013 and orbiting Mars since 2014, MAVEN spent more than a decade studying how the planet lost its atmosphere and helped explain how Mars transformed from a potentially habitable world into the cold, dry planet seen today. The New York Times reports:
The NASA spacecraft MAVEN, short for Mars Atmosphere and Volatile Evolution, had been orbiting around the Red Planet since 2014. NASA last received a signal from MAVEN on Dec. 6, shortly before the spacecraft passed behind Mars. Then the spacecraft stopped responding. A review board found that MAVEN began unexpectedly rotating, causing its batteries to drain too quickly and resulting in a loss of power to the communications system.

“The team is certainly broken up about this,” said Shannon Curry, the principal investigator of the mission and a scientist at the University of Colorado Boulder, at a news conference on Wednesday. “But at the same time, we are incredibly proud of the science we’ve accomplished over the last decade.” NASA officials declined to speculate on the root cause of the mishap. A final report is expected to be released later this year.

Noticed a lot of endings today

By Provocateur • Score: 3 Thread

Isn’t there a rule of threes?

Let’s see…Stargate, Mars Maven, imaginary girlfriend…That’s it.

It could have been worse

By necro81 • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
Having it die spontaneously while in service to its (very) extended mission is a much better fate than being functional but deliberately shut down under the guise of “savings”.

A failure for our time

By dsgrntlxmply • Score: 4, Funny Thread
This mission could have been saved by a spin doctor.

Amazon’s New Stargate Series Is Officially Dead

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Amazon has reportedly killed its planned new Stargate series despite giving it a series order in 2025. According to Variety, studio executives were worried it would only appeal to longtime fans. ScreenRant reports:
Reports of what became Gero’s Stargate series started in 2022, after Amazon acquired MGM Studios. Dean Devlin, who co-wrote the 1994 Stargate movie with Emmerich, was another executive producer for the Amazon show, as were Joby Harold and Tory Tunnell via Safehouse Pictures. The project also had Brad Wright and Joe Mallozzi as consulting producers, with both having had extensive history working within the Stargate franchise.

On X, Michael Shanks, who played Daniel Jackson in Stargate SG-1, posted in response to the news that: “Yep. They did that.” Mallozzi was resistant to the idea that the series was being geared toward diehard fans: “Nope. No. Sorry. Gonna have to push back on this. We were ever mindful of creating a show that would have broad appeal.” In an additional post, Mallozzi went into further detail about why the cancellation is so disappointing:

Before the new series was canceled by Amazon, Stargate began with Emmerich and Devlin’s movie starring Kurt Russell and James Spader. This paved the way for 10 seasons of Stargate SG-1, followed by five seasons of Stargate Atlantis. There has also been the two-season Stargate Universe, the one-season animated show Stargate Infinity, the web miniseries Stargate Origins, and the 2008 direct-to-video movies Stargate: The Ark of Truth and Stargate Continuum, along with numerous games.

Re:Yeah. Just like James Bond or Star Trek

By Vrallis • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Canning it because of fears it would only attract old viewers is idiotic.

That is modern Hollywood though. Just look how many franchises have been destroyed because they insist on rewriting them for “modern audiences” that never show up, throwing away the entire existing fan base in the process—Star Trek, Star Wars, etc.

This was probably for the best. If this was the same attitude the studio obviously had then they would have kept trying to interfere repeatedly during production until they got their way.

Unnecessary

By Baron_Yam • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Stargate SG1 had a great setup for cheap production of an episodic planet-of-the-week show but that’s hardly unique.

The Stargate isn’t what made the show special, it was the self-aware humour and the charismatic cast. And the original cast is too damn old now, so you’d be rolling the dice with a remake.

In my opinion, it’s better to build a new setting than try to reinvent the old one. At least that way you don’t have baggage to worry about.

Amazon wanted to Rings of Powerify Stargate

By schwit1 • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

https://x.com/AI_EmeraldApple/…

The rumor is that the show writer, Martin Gero, would not budge on compromising lore or elements within the show for a “wider modern audience” as they did with Rings of Power for LoTR lore.

Martin Gero wanted to create a show that maintained continuity in the story and lore of the old shows, including the mythology and tech, while respecting the 17 seasons of history.

Amazon instead wanted something new for the “modern audience” that’s more accessible, reimagined, with more modern casual sensibilities.

Because the showrunners wanted to maintain integrity rather than turn Stargate into another “modern audience slop” like Rings of Power, Amazon leadership canceled it. The franchise heavyweight, like Joseph Mallozzi, was very excited for the fresh stories Gero worked on. Amazon says they are still open to Stargate, just not “this” version… yes they wanted to Rings of Powerify Stargate.

Re:still bummed about SG-U

By drinkypoo • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I wish they’d done a few more seasons of Stargate Universe. I’m curious where the story would have gone, and what they would have found.

It took too long to get to the good part, by which time it had lost people.

If they had compressed seasons 1 and 2 into one season and lost the most worthless episodes, they might have gone on.

When the show is called Stargate, you expect Stargatey stuff. They set the expectation, then failed to meet it.

Re:still bummed about SG-U

By argStyopa • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I too felt that way about SGU. Aside from introducing me to Flogging Molly - in one of the best applications of popular music to a show ever - I enjoyed the story that SGU was telling.

ON THE OTHER HAND…nostalgia is a powerful drug.
A coworker and I have watched from SG movie, SG1 through Atlantis all the way into SGU; we’re in SGU S02E10 and … it’s palpably running out of gas. Atlantis was absolutely an evolutionary step up from the monster-of-the-week very-1990s-feeling episodic SG1. It ended when it should have, while SG1 ran about 3-4 seasons too long.
SGU then was an *absolute* step up in writing depth and character building but already in season two it feels adrift. From episodes where basically nothing happens to utterly-contrived conflicts (let’s be honest, the entire Lucian invasion plot was incredibly stupid from s2e1). Also a tiresome (to me) emphasis on personal dramas…blech. That’s not what I’m watching the show for “Peyton Place in Spaaaaaace....”
I’ve read JM’s reddit posts on ‘what might have happened’ which just reinforces that none of this was already-baked, just writer-room ideas basically. Which it very much feels like.
I don’t recall precisely the last half of SGU season 2, I only generally recall it ended sort of abruptly. But right now, halfway through? I’m more looking forward to getting through it and us starting our Babylon 5 watchthrough more than the 2nd half of SGU.

Demand Is Booming For New No Tech, Repairable Tractor

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from 404 Media:
The secondary market for decades old, low-tech John Deere tractors has been booming for years as farmers have sought reliable tractors that they can actually fix without having to deal with John Deere’s repair monopoly. A Canadian company has seen that demand and came up with a radical thought: What if they made a new, repairable, “no-tech” tractor to solve what has become a gigantic pain point for farmers? Alberta’s Ursa Ag says that it has been inundated with demand after announcing its tractor, which costs roughly half as much as a Deere and has the benefit of not being a repair nightmare.

[…] Ursa Ag markets its tractors as “no frills” and “built to last.” Ursa Ag’s Doug Wilson told me that the company designed the tractor because of a need in the marketplace for a new machine that isn’t loaded with tech and is easy to maintain. The company follows in the footsteps of consumer electronics companies like Fairphone, which makes a repairable smartphone and Framework, which makes modular, repairable laptops. The demand Ursa Ag has seen is part of the backlash to manufacturer repair monopolies and the injection of technology and internet-connected sensors and terms of use into even the most basic of gadgets. “I talk to farmers every day and I hear from farmers every day about how they went out and bought machinery from 1987 so that it wouldn’t have a computer on it,” Wilson said. “All of this came from a simple discussion with a customer who wanted to be able to turn [the tractor] on at the start of the day, to use it, and shut it off at the end of the day. It needed to work, so that’s what we built.”

Ursa Ag’s tractor has been hyped in agriculture circles after Wilson showed the tractor off at a Canadian farm show and it was featured by Farms.com. Wilson said more than a thousand farmers have contacted him after that show, from roughly 30 countries. “I got a handwritten letter from a farmer in France who doesn’t own a computer and wanted us to mail him information about the tractors,” he said. He said the company has thus far made a couple fewer than 100 tractors but is working on tripling its production capacity and has seen a lot of demand over the last few months.
“Given the number of my customers that carry flip phones, I would say there is consumer pressure to back away from some of the technology that is unnecessary to perform everyday tasks,” Wilson said. “So that is definitely transferable to dishwashers and washing machines, refrigerators. Refrigerators that have screens on them that’ll tell you what’s inside. It’s a little crazy.”
“That high-tech stuff, the million-dollar John Deere tractor has a place. It has technology that is well worth the money,” Wilson said. “But that technology is needed for 5 percent of what a farm does. There are so many applications for tractors on farms that don’t require technology. The technology that goes into even a calculator is not required for most farming applications.”

Capitalism wins again.

By gurps_npc • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Let’s be clear: Attempting to prevent the customers that ‘bought’ your product from repairing them is NOT capitalism.

Capitalism is all about the free market. When you try to enslave your ‘customers’, forcing them to come to you to repair rather than competing on the open market for repair work, you are not a capitalist. You are at best a plutocrat.

People want freedom, not to be owned by the company they thought they were buying stuff from.

Re:How Do They Make Money?

By caseih • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Farmer here.

Yeah their profits won’t be as high as John Deere. But they can still make at least $20k-$30k profit on each tractor they sell. By the way mainline dealerships don’t make much money on new tractors either but they do make a lot of money on used sales. Anyway they won’t be selling tremendously high volumes (they simply don’t have the capacity to assemble them very quickly), so they aren’t going to get fantastically rich doing this. But they are filling a niche.

I’ve actually seen these tractors and sat in them. They are bare bones machines. Cab comfort is reasonable. You can install a third-part GPS guidance system in them. Transmission is simple but rugged, and a common transmission overseas. Completely manual with a high-low power shift. Engine is claimed to be a genuine Cummins 8.3L (more on this below). Hydraulic and 3 pt controls are all manual linkages. Would make a good chore tractor. They seem to be decent quality.

I wish they’d be a little more forthcoming about some things, though. They don’t make the tractor; they assemble it. With the possible exception of the engine, the entire thing is manufactured in China with the color and decal scheme they chose. You can find this same tractor from numerous vendors on Alibaba. I have heard, that they are using genuine reman engines in these tractors.

Re:Capitalism wins again.

By quintessencesluglord • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Consistently amazed that Capitalism(TM) only has good characteristics and apparently no bad.

The only other thing that seems to come close is religon.

Re:Capitalism wins again.

By SuiteSisterMary • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

You buy some flour for a dollar. You use that flour to bake bread. You sell that bread for two dollars.

Why the price increase? Because you’ve improved the capital.

Modified capitalism

By Okian Warrior • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Consistently amazed that Capitalism(TM) only has good characteristics and apparently no bad.

The only other thing that seems to come close is religon.

The big critique about capitalism is wealth inequality - it invariably leads to some people getting most of the money, and everyone else getting very little money.

The problem with that critique is that wealth inequality is mathematically more fundamental than any economic system. In other words, any time there is trade in value, you will get wealth inequality regardless of the system.

You can see this in numerous simulations online, such as this one.

Wealth inequality follows a Boltzman distribution or a Pareto distribution, depending on the type of investments allowed, and this can be proven mathematically.

About 2.5 million books are published in the US each year, about the square root of that number (1500) break even in sales, and about the square root of *that* number (35) are best sellers. Lebron James scores 43,000 points in his career, Kobe Bryant scores 34,000 points, and there are a zillion players that score lesser values.

Wealth inequality happens any time you have trade in value, this can be proven mathematically, and it applies to any value in any system.

And as a side note, once you realize wealth inequality is inevitable, the main selling point of Communism disappears. Wealth inequality happens under Communism as well, and we have numerous examples of this in recent history.

To be fair, this wasn’t known when Marx was writing his thesis. At that time (1850’s), economics hadn’t progressed as far as it has today. Marx himself had a degree in law and philosophy, and not economics or psychology.

Capitalism has a bunch of bad characteristics, but we try to modify it to reduce the damage. For example, you can’t sell patent medicines any more, you can’t sell fake stock shares, and so on.

We use a modified version of capitalism that tries to avoid the bad characteristics.

Fedora Linux 43 Exposes 20-Year-Old Microsoft Outlook Security Failure

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
BrianFagioli writes:
Fedora Linux 43 users upgrading to the latest Dovecot mail server discovered something rather unsettling: some older Microsoft Outlook configurations may have been silently ignoring SSL/TLS settings for POP3 email connections for years. According to a Fedora community blog post, affected Outlook clients reportedly continued using insecure port 110 connections even when encryption was enabled in the application settings. The issue surfaced after Dovecot 2.4 disabled plaintext authentication on non secure connections by default, causing Outlook users to suddenly lose mailbox access after the Fedora 43 upgrade.

The report suggests the behavior may date back as far as Outlook 2007, although modern Outlook builds were not fully tested. Fedora admins stress that the problem could be limited to legacy account configurations rather than current versions of Outlook itself. Still, the discovery has sparked discussion among Linux admins and security folks because many users likely assumed their email traffic was encrypted simply because Outlook claimed SSL/TLS was enabled. The incident also highlights how stricter defaults in modern open source infrastructure can expose ancient assumptions and questionable behaviors that quietly survived for decades.

“Legacy configurations”

By sound+vision • Score: 3 Thread

limited to legacy account configurations rather than current versions of Outlook

I’m assuming “legacy account configurations” means anyone who hasn’t moved to “Outlook (new)" or whatever they’re calling it this week. Meaning the vast majority of Outlook users.

Lookout!

By OrangAsm • Score: 5, Funny Thread
Better name for it.

Email guy…

By Temkin • Score: 4, Informative Thread

So I’m an email guy from way back… Literally decades…

Nobody leaves ports 110 & 143 open & exposed anymore. Not just blocked by a firewall rule, the Dovecot daemon’s themselves, properly configured, simply don’t listen on non-secure ports anymore at all. It’s dead technology. You get bit by this, you’re just an idiot.

What I found amusing is the bit about modern Outlook vs. Legacy. Modern Outlook, even on your desktop, is a cloud play. You might think you have a local App. You don’t. Modern Outlook can’t handle a simple “Linux” username as an account. The user “bob@example.com” represented by a “bob” entry in /etc/password cannot be used by a modern Outlook client. It passes the domain to M$ cloud and converts it to “bob@example.com”, which a local vanity Dovecot domain will reject. It’s intentional… They have placed their cloud between your local App and the email server. You think you’re running a local app, but they’re hoovering up all your email in a proxy config.

T

Re:“Legacy configurations”

By caseih • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

STARTTLS on port 110 is was a very common configuration. So you wouldn’t tell anything in the logs from simply the port number.

EU Plots To Abandon US Tech

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Ancient Slashdot reader whitroth shares a report from Politico, with the caption: "shutting down Microsoft Office for the International Criminal Court (ICC) was clearly a wake-up call.” From the report:
The EU is moving to counter American dominance in technology by reaching for one of the oldest tools in its arsenal: industrial strategy. As the European Commission unveiled a plan Wednesday to reduce Europe’s reliance on the foreign technology providers that underpin the modern economy, it was careful to stress that it was not picking a fight with U.S. digital giants. Instead, the tech sovereignty package — motivated in no small part by U.S. President Donald Trump’s weaponization of Europe’s dependence on American firms — takes a longer-term view: boost the continent’s players so they can eventually challenge their U.S. rivals.

[…] If adopted, the package will direct public money toward products that contribute to Europe’s economy and independence from foreign firms; cut red tape for data centers; beef up research and innovation through “leadership initiatives”; incentivize countries to share digital capacities in a new “Eurocloud” forum; and require EU governments to come up with national strategies to boost the adoption of cutting-edge tech, including AI. The package will also seek to ramp up the bloc’s demand for advanced chips — a response to criticism by the industry — with a series of industrial initiatives to revise a 2023 chips law.

[…] As part of its proposal to keep a list of trustworthy countries, the Commission would require EU governments to run a so-called “sovereignty risk assessment” for every digital service they rely on, measuring foreign control, potential access to sensitive data and the risk of operational disruption. Within a year, they would have to determine the appropriate level of protection for each public sector and procure digital services accordingly — unless they can prove doing so would come at a “disproportionate cost,” the proposal reads. However, the Commission reserves the right to overrule their assessment in future legislation if it believes they downplayed the risks. The Commission estimated that just one percent of Europe’s public services are so sensitive that they would be required under the proposed certification scheme to rely on the strict level that totally excludes foreign technology.
“We cannot afford to depend on others for the technologies that keep our hospitals running, our energy grids stable and our services secure,” Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said in a statement. “This is about protecting our citizens, defending our interests and making our own choices.”

Re:Stupid is as stupid does

By 93 Escort Wagon • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Thanks, Trump

He can’t hear you over all the WINNING!

Re:Stupid is as stupid does

By gweihir • Score: 5, Funny Thread

I am not sure. With his attack on Iran he may have done massive good for decarbonization and climate protection. Not what he intended, of course.

But his biggest achievement will doubtlessly be ending the American Century. It was about time.

Re:EU will not Deregulate To Accomplish This

By gweihir • Score: 5, Informative Thread

That is some fine FUD you have there. For example, the only time the GDPR gets tricky is when you plan to abuse and circumvent it. You should not believe the propaganda the billionaires put out. It rots your brain.

Re:EU will not Deregulate To Accomplish This

By gweihir • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

That is really insightless nonsense. I have done GDPR audits for companies as small as 5 people working there. It takes one person with a working brain a few days to figure this out. That is, unless you plan to steal your customer’s data and use every loophole available. Then it gets really tricky. And that is why the billionaires complain and useful idiots believe this nonsense.

Re:Dude deregulation isn’t a panacea

By gweihir • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Indeed. But the crap MS does stops now. I have no idea how they could be so incredibly stupid to block the ICC accounts or, recently, leak the names of Swedish Government Regulators to the US Congress. Yes, they are required to do this by law (just a “maybe” for the first case), but it seems MS has not fought back one bit and they did not really oppose the Cloud Act when they could have when either.

It is now exceptionally clear to any government and most companies on the planet that US companies like Microsoft can disable your MS-based IT when the US administration wants them to do so for arbitrary reasons or personal vengeance but the regime leader and can also steal all your data in there and hand it to the US administration. That completely removes any longer-term future for this tech outside of the US.

MacBook Neo is So Popular That Apple Reportedly Doubled Production

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
According to supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo, Apple has reportedly doubled 2026 MacBook Neo production from 5 million to 10 million units after stronger-than-expected demand for its $599 budget laptop. MacRumors reports:
On an earnings call in late April, Apple’s CEO Tim Cook said that customer response to the MacBook Neo was “off the charts,” and the popularity of the laptop has reportedly led the company to significantly boost production. […] Apple was very optimistic about the MacBook Neo before announcing it, but the company still “undercalled” the level of enthusiasm that the laptop would generate, according to Cook. He said that MacBook Neo demand exceeded Apple’s expectations and helped to drive a record number of first-time Mac buyers last quarter.

New figures from market research firm IDC support Apple’s claim that the MacBook Neo is selling well, and the Windows PC industry has taken notice. For example, Dell recently introduced a redesigned XPS 13 laptop from $699 and said it has features “you won’t find on a MacBook Neo,” such as a touch screen and a backlit keyboard. “Apple’s MacBook Neo is a capable machine, and its arrival confirms that there’s real appetite for premium quality at accessible prices,” admitted Dell.

Purchased one for non-tech family

By sinij • Score: 5, Informative Thread
It is surprisingly solid both in quality and performance. Also, when comparing to windows it runs much better than what I expected out of hardware specs. Last but not least, Apple had no issues with me never creating accounts and doing everything locally.

Re:Weird. But good for stockholders.

By dbialac • Score: 5, Informative Thread

With the Neo you are not going to be able to do much more than browse the web, use web application, play simple games, and use it as fancy typewriter.

I think you’re overlooking something seriously important: most people who buy computers these days don’t need serious hardware. They need something to browse the internet with, maybe play some online games and to run something equivalent to Word and Excel. In other words, exactly what you just said.

2020 MacBook Air M1 8GB surprisingly good …

By drnb • Score: 5, Informative Thread
For testing purposes I bought the most modest Apple Silicon based Mac ever made, the 2020 MacBook Air M1 8GB. The Neo is actually somewhat comparable performance wise. I have been completely surprised by how usable the M1 8GB system is. It is entirely usable for typical K-12 and even college use. Slow but usable, so OK when on the road but not the home office, for software development use. For most homework assignments or projects in a CS college degree program it’s probably just fine. Depending on the project it might even squeak by in a computer vision class, where final results rather than near real time operation is probably the goal.

Seems obvious

By codemachine • Score: 5, Funny Thread

"… confirms that there’s real appetite for premium quality at accessible prices”

Gee, who would’ve thought? Did Dell really need Apple to release a laptop to figure out that little nugget of information?

Re:2020 MacBook Air M1 8GB surprisingly good …

By sg_oneill • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Yeah earlier this year I brough my girlfriend a pretty base model Macbook M1 Air w/ 8gb, and about a week later my cat managed to damange the keyboard on my usual machine leaping onto it from a height, so I ended up using the M1 air for a couple of weeks as my work laptop while I waited for repairs and… it worked flawlessly? Keeping Jetbrains IntelliJ, microsoft word, and various terminals for logging into servers open, it ran it smoothly and even felt quite snappy. For sure the 8gb posed a few problems with large workloads, but for its intended use, my GF being able to read the net and use office suite for work. its great.

I’ll probably buy her daughter one of the Neos for university, since she’s been bugging me for a computer.

Google Launches ‘Gemma 4 12B’ AI Model That Can Run On Your Laptop

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Google has launched Gemma 4 12B, a 12-billion-parameter open AI model designed to run locally on your laptop without depending entirely on cloud infrastructure. WION reports:
According to Google, the new model delivers performance close to much larger AI systems while requiring significantly less memory. The company says Gemma 4 12B can run locally on devices equipped with just 16GB of VRAM, making advanced AI more accessible to developers, researchers and businesses. The launch highlights a growing trend across the AI industry: bringing powerful AI models directly to personal computers instead of relying solely on remote data centers.

Gemma is Google’s family of open AI models built using technology and research from its Gemini program. The new Gemma 4 12B model contains 12 billion parameters and has been designed to handle multiple types of information, including text, images and audio. Unlike traditional AI systems that focus only on text, Gemma 4 12B can understand visual content, process audio inputs and perform advanced reasoning tasks. This makes it suitable for a wider range of applications, from software development and content creation to research and automation. Google says the model is available under the Apache 2.0 licence, allowing developers and organizations to use, modify and deploy it with relatively few restrictions.

[…] One of the most significant technical changes in Gemma 4 12B is its new unified architecture. Traditionally, multimodal AI systems use separate components known as encoders to process images, audio and text before combining the information. Google says Gemma 4 12B removes the need for separate multimodal encoders. Instead, the model processes different types of information through a unified architecture. According to the company, this helps improve efficiency while reducing memory requirements and computational overhead. The result is a model that can deliver advanced multimodal capabilities while remaining small enough to run locally on modern hardware.

“It can run on your laptop” is not the news

By allo • Score: 4, Informative Thread

If you like 12B models, there is Mistral-Nemo since 2 years.

If you are more VRAM constrained, there was Llama 3 8B. There is now Qwen3.5 9B. Gemma 4 already had E4B and E2B for devices like your smartphone. Ministral 3 also has 3B, 8B, 14B variants. There is more than enough choice for small models. And with offloading some layers to CPU RAM you can even run larger ones.

The interesting part of this model is that it is multi-modal (it supports image and audio input) without an encoder. That’s new to the Gemma architecture.

Re:Neato

By allo • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

There is none. The Gemma 4 series are pretty solid general purpose models and the 12B is the latest bridging the gap between the E4B and the 26B-A4B model.

Get a recent llama.cpp and get started: https://llama.app/
For Gemma-4 12B you may need the latest git version or wait a day for a new build.

Google Shares Fitbit Air Blueprints So Anyone Can 3D-Print Accessories

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Google has released (PDF) technical specs and 2D CAD drawings for the Fitbit Air to encourage users to make their own accessories. “These CAD drawings include crucial mating dimensions, tolerances, and mating force specifications — including attach and detach force — to help you build a high-quality accessory band,” Google says on a store page listing. 9to5Google reports:
Noting how the “community has already come up with innovative and creative new ideas to make the Fitbit Air [their] own” since launch last month, Google is “officially releasing the hardware specifications and accessory design guidelines for the Fitbit Air tracker to the public.” For example, owners have already found their own bicep band solutions. This information would typically just be available for third-party accessory companies, but Google wants to open things up to “independent designers and artisan makers.”
The Google Store page also lists other things developers should keep in mind, such as sensor clearance, sensor pressure, secure retention, and skin-friendly materials.

Microsoft Plans Linux Tools, RTX Spark Desktop For Windows Devs

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica:
Microsoft’s Build developer conference kicked off today, and as with almost everything the company has done in the last few years, Microsoft’s opening keynote focused overwhelmingly on AI and other closely related technologies. […] On the hardware front, we didn’t get any updates for existing Surface devices (not counting yesterday’s Surface Laptop Ultra announcement), but we did get something new: the Surface RTX Spark Dev Box is “a compact developer PC” built around Nvidia’s new RTX Spark chip with up to 128GB of built-in memory. The Dev Box looks a little like a cartoon anvil or piano fell onto an Xbox Series X and flattened it. Its aluminum casing was designed “to double as a heatsink,” and its preloaded version of Windows 11 Pro will include a “purposeful” set of developer-centric default settings and preinstalled tools.

This is a follow-up of sorts to the Windows Dev Kit 2023, also known as “Project Volterra.” This Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3-powered PC was essentially the system board from a Surface Pro tablet stuffed into a plastic box, and it was introduced alongside Arm-native versions of several Microsoft developer tools. It helped to set the stage for the Arm-based flagship Surface devices that launched the next year, which benefitted from a better and faster x86-to-Arm code translation technology called Prism and a greater number of Arm-native third-party apps that didn’t need to be translated in the first place. Microsoft didn’t announce pricing or specific specs for the RTX Spark Dev Box, but you can probably expect it to cost quite a bit more than the $600 that Project Volterra did. Hopefully, Microsoft can keep the price at least somewhat lower than the $4,699 asking price for Nvidia’s similarly specced DGX Spark box.

On the software side, several developer-centric changes are coming to Windows 11, particularly for users of the Windows Subsystem for Linux (WSL). Microsoft is introducing a Windows-native version of the coreutils command line tools, so that commands or scripts made for Linux work within Windows and the other way around; the ability to run WSL inside of containers, said to be arriving in “the coming months”; and something called Windows Developer Configurations that uses the WinGet tool to quickly set up “a distraction-free dev environment with VS Code, GitHub Copilot, WSL, PowerShell 7 and developer-optimized settings with one command on any Windows 11 device.”
Microsoft also introduced Microsoft Execution Containers (MXC), as “enterprise-grade sandboxed environments” that let AI agents like OpenClaw operate on Windows without getting unrestricted access to the whole system. In theory, MXC could let organizations enforce agent-specific limits, such as blocking access to personal accounts, separating work and personal data, or requiring permission before deleting files.
The MXC GitHub repo also notes support for “multiple containment backends,” meaning the same sandboxing concept could apply beyond AI agents to other plugins, tools, and workloads.

Further reading: Microsoft Unveils Scout, an Autonomous AI Agent Built On OpenClaw

Could you…?

By cayenne8 • Score: 3 Thread
Could you install Linux on this new box?

Meta Workers Can Opt Out of Workplace Tracking for Up to 30 Minutes

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Meta is scaling back parts of its employee tracking initiative after staff objected to software that collected mouse movements, clicks, keystrokes, and other actions for AI training data. According to Reuters, the company will now let workers pause collection for up to 30 minutes and request exemptions. Reuters reports:
[Stephane Kasriel, a vice president in Meta’s AI model-building Superintelligence Labs unit] said the team behind the software had also introduced “several optimizations” to reduce its impact on computer battery life, after employees complained it was consuming so much data it was causing their home internet usage to spike. “While we remain confident in the privacy protections we put in place at launch, which went through several layers of risk review, we have heard your concerns about personal data on work devices, battery life, and wanting more control over when capturing happens,” Kasriel said in the memo.

Re:And I’m sure Meta won’t violate it

By fahrbot-bot • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

They would never violate anyone’s privacy, pinky swear!

And the number of times you opt out won’t appear on your performance reviews, or factor into raises, bonuses and retention - double pinky swear …

concerns about personal data on work devices

By blahbooboo • Score: 3 Thread
If someone who works for a company, especially Meta, is doing anything personal on their work owned equipment they’re complete morons.

Heck, id be concerned even allowing a Meta corporate laptop on my home network at all (even if its split to a separate subnet)

And if you do this…

By Yo,dog! • Score: 3 Thread
you’re FIRED!

I read this part before, I think

By Zak3056 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

As O’Brien passed the telescreen a thought seemed to strike him. He stopped, turned aside and pressed a switch on the wall. There was a sharp snap. The voice had stopped.

Julia uttered a tiny sound, a sort of squeak of surprise. Even in the midst of his panic, Winston was too much taken aback to be able to hold his tongue.

‘You can turn it off!’ he said.

‘Yes,’ said O’Brien, ‘we can turn it off. We have that privilege.’

That’s about enough time …

By PPH • Score: 3 Thread

.. for me to log onto the DoJ server and file my daily undercover surveillance report.

Microsoft Claims New Quantum Chip 1,000 Times Better Than Before

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Microsoft says its new Majorana 2 quantum chip is 1,000 times more reliable than its predecessor, with qubits lasting about 20 seconds instead of milliseconds, and claims it could have a commercially useful quantum machine by 2029. The BBC reports:
“We will have a quantum machine in 2029 that can solve commercially viable, reasonable problems,” said Zulfi Alam, corporate vice president of Microsoft Quantum. That would still require huge further advances as such a device would require millions of qubits - the current chip, Alam said, has 12. Assessing the firm’s claims are difficult because it does not release the full details of what it has discovered publicly, citing commercial confidentiality.

Microsoft has spent 20 years pursuing an approach to quantum computing known as “topological.” The firm’s approach to this is based on exploiting the properties of a so-called quasi-particle, which had existed only in theory, since it was first predicted in the 1930s by Italian physicist Ettore Majorana. To do this it had to exploit a novel state of matter - different from the three familiar states of liquid, solid or gas.

Paul Stevenson, a physics professor at the University of Surrey, said the tech giant’s timeline sounded plausible - if its research lived up to its claims. “Microsoft appears to have made a leap in their attempt to produce viable topological qubits,” he said. “If they succeed, they will leap from being a player with no production quantum computer, to being a serious player in the race to make the next generation of fault-tolerant machines.”

When you scale this…

By zurkeyon • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
Across time and stack it with tech light LightMatter, the Resurgence of Memristor technology, and the recent discoveries with germanium and other materials, you can begin to see the integrated systems of the nexxt 5-10 years coming together. Real question is… Who writes the “OS” for such a construct? Are “We” even capable of doing it ourselves? Interesting times.

“By 2029…” This sounds familiar…

By SCVonSteroids • Score: 3 Thread

I feel like there’s this other technology that’s just been a few years away for the last 50+ years… Any day now…

No, It Won’t.

By sudonim2 • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

No company will release a commercial quantum computer by 2029. No company is ever going to release a commercial quantum computer of any kind. If there is any actual utility to quantum computers beneath the hype, it will be a niche matter at best.

Anyone who wants to disagree with me can do so by betting against me in Kalshi. I will gladly take your money. If you are unwilling to put your money where oyur mouth is, I’m just going to ignore you.

MS claims discovery of new particle?

By Tablizer • Score: 5, Funny Thread

…the Higgs BSOD

Re:No, It Won’t.

By gweihir • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Well, there is some potential that the tech could work, but a) no proof and b) the scaling is so abysmally bad so it will _never_ get to any useful size. Classical computers scaled exponentially for a while, even though that has topped about 10 years ago or so. QCs scale _inverse_ exponentially and that means there is a pretty low number of QBits and calculation lengths you cannot, ever, reach. This universe is too small for that to ever happen.

But, yes. The still current factoring record for a QC is 29 or so and this was not done with the general algorithm, because that failed. It was done with an algorithm specialized for the number, i.e. is meaningless. But this _is_ the largest actual QC calculation ever done, except for some simulated annealing stuff that does not scale at all and is meaningless compared to classical approaches. Now, what does factoring 29 prove? Nothing at all. It is far, far, far too small a problem to be sure it was actual quantum effects that could (theoretically) scale up.

Android Gets Fake Call Detection That Uses RCS

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from 9to5Google:
Phone by Google wants to combat the “growing threat of impersonation scams” and protect Android users against “sophisticated, AI-powered deepfake attacks" with fake call detection. […] Fake call detection requires that both parties are on Android and use the Phone by Google app, while Google Messages and Google Contacts also have to be installed. When a contact calls, their phone “sends a silent confirmation signal in real time to your device to verify the call is legitimate and truly coming from the contact’s device.”

This digital handshake uses end-to-end encrypted RCS (Rich Communication Services). If you’re being scammed by an impersonator, your phone will notice that the “initial confirmation signal will be missing,” and ping the contact’s real device to double-check. If their real device says, “I’m not making a call right now,” you’ll get a warning on your screen advising you to hang up immediately. This feature will be available globally on Android 12+ phones starting with Pixel devices this month. Fake call detection is enabled by default but can be turned off at any time. Google says it’s “possible for other apps and device manufacturers to adopt this technology” given the RCS underpinnings.
You can learn more about fake call detection in Google’s blog post.

You are protected

By TwistedGreen • Score: 5, Funny Thread

This is great! The more Google knows about me, the more they can protect me. I will feel so much safer once this rolls out.

Duress Words and other Defense Mechanisms.

By geekmux • Score: 3 Thread

In the rapidly growing era of AI-driven attacks against humans abusing the more traditional forms of urgent communication (voice, video, etc.), it becomes quite important for us meatsacks to remember the value of duress words. Which you should coordinate with you fellow loved ones in person. Using hand-written paper and/or a whisper-level voice to document and share.

Ensure everyone is well aware of growing scams by agreeing to call or contact each other at minimum specific intervals. Consider a collective agreement in which no financial decision above a certain threshold is decided without others being involved or made aware. Ensure all involved can be fully trusted to understand why these protections are becoming necessary.

And if RCS is turned off?

By jddj • Score: 3 Thread

On the spammer’s phone? On the impersonee’s phone? On the target’s phone?

I have RCS turned off on mine because
a. SMS works when nothing else does.
b. I don’t fancy my every text going through Google.

Re:Easier fix…

By arglebargle_xiv • Score: 5, Funny Thread
Well in my case they have to send me a fax to make an appointment to call me on my cellphone. This has been effective in stopping 100% of scam calls.

HOLY SHIT!

By TheMiddleRoad • Score: 3 Thread
Google actually made a useful feature.

Thanks To Robots, Ukraine Is Now Talking About Winning, Not Just Surviving

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot
fjo3 shares a report from Defense One:
A small but growing number of European officials and analysts are saying what four years ago was unthinkable: Ukraine isn’t just surviving its grueling war with Russia, it is in some ways thriving and may even be on a path to victory. This isn’t yet captured in headlines — for example, about last weekend’s barrage of Russian drones and missiles around Ukraine — but in the details, like how some 90 percent were intercepted. Several long-term trends have shifted in Ukraine’s favor, and the core reason is its fierce focus on AI and robotics.

In the crucible of war, Ukraine has developed drones and ground robots that can hold territory — even take it back. Some are fully controlled by humans, like supply robots and medical-evacuation vehicles. But an increasing number are controlled in at least some aspects by dozens of AI products, from guidance packages on aerial drones to decision aids at the highest levels. […] Just as important as the tech are the new tactics. Given unusual latitude to experiment, Ukrainian fighters began to develop robot-forward infantry concepts, like combined-arms attacks by airborne and ground systems, “more than a year ago. Right now, we’re massively starting to implement this,” said Davyd Aloian, deputy secretary of the National Security and Defence Council of Ukraine, the coordinating body on domestic and international security, in an interview.

Ukraine and its partners are also steaming ahead on new concepts for highly autonomous defenses against Russian drones, combining ISR sensors and AI to detect and identify enemy drones in less time and with more certainty. “All of the systems are being linked with each other and with people” to create a distributed network with interceptor drones at various locations to be activated when needed, Aloian said. “One day we will have only like 10 guys who are just going to be responsible for approving interception. And it will automatically go direct to the target.” The human operators will be dispersed as well. “Everything can be controlled from Kyiv, Lviv, from cities in other countries,” he said.
“It’s not what happened to Ukraine” (referencing Russia’s barrage of Shahed drones) that “should scare us in Europe,” said Swarmer CEO Serhii Kupriienko. It’s how quickly Ukraine’s “middling” military evolved to counter Russia’s invasion.

“We are behind by literally 10 years or 20 years” in some defense-technology areas, such as satellite imagery, Kupriienko said, and yet his country has climbed a capability curve that just two years ago seemed insurmountable. So could others, he said. “The answer is always AI solutions and integrating the AI into even the daily routine work within the bureaucracy,” he said.

“We have evolved since 2022, the industry has and our defense has as well. Right now we are able to provide not only [large quantities of drone] assets but everything what is needed to build out the ecosystem,” including parts and production, training, modification, etc. Aloian said.

Re:The Ukrainians aren’t winning.

By AleRunner • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

What Ukraine hasn’t learned is that you don’t kill Russians, you maim Russians. That way 1) they live and 2) have to be cared for and 3) a man with no arms and one leg will be a reminder for decades.

That doesn’t work as well in the current conflict. Russia has been sending the seriously wounded back into the field even with barely functional legs and crutches, with the basic understanding that one man destroys one drone independent of how well he moves. This is also a large part of the reason that with “only” 1.3 million casualties, Russia has over 500k dead. A nation which values life will normally have something like 1:3 or 1:5 dead to casualty ratios and many recent conflicts with modern forces came to over 1:10 because of the effective evacuation and treatment available. That just doesn’t apply in Ukraine.

Re:To be clear

By phantomfive • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Nice comment. We now know that Biden didn’t want to win the war, because he was afraid of nukes.

In modern war, the side with air superiority wins the war. The side with air superiority has weapons that can attack but can’t be attacked back: that’s too huge an advantage. The entire reason that Ukraine didn’t fall in three months is because somehow Russia failed to establish air superiority. Ukraine managed to shoot airplanes out of the sky if they got too close. So it’s a situation where neither side has superiority: a stalemate. Ukraine is building up their airforce. When they’ve built it up enough to establish air superiority, they will win the war. European industrial production is powerful.

Drones are a challenge for Russia. As you cleverly called them, Wunderwaffen have come up from time to time in the conflict, from HIMARS to Baryaktar. They’ve presented challenges to the Russian military, but so far the Russian military has found a solution every time. Russia has presented problems to Ukraine as well, such as motorcycles and glide bombs. Ukraine has found an answer for them as well.

Currently drones have halted or maybe reversed the Russian advance. Russia is working on a solution, and we will see if they overcome this challenge. If they can’t it will be an embarrassing loss, much like Finland.

The real question will be if Russia can stop Ukraine’s growing airforce. Currently Russia is losing anti-air systems faster than they can be replaced. Russia doesn’t have the technology to match NATO air weapons, so the answer is no. But it might take until 2030.

Re:The key is China

By Koreantoast • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
China is actually in a dilemma with Russia. On one hand, they want the Russian regime to survive only because it provides a political counterbalance to the EU in Europe. However, they are frustrated with the Russians constantly expanding the war and threatening to attack other nations because they don’t want the Russians to provoke NATO rearmament and remilitarization. So they are trying to calibrate to keep the Russians alive while making sure they don’t give them so much that they’ll start another war.

Re:False optimism - no permanent tech advantages

By nealric • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

This analysis is simply wrong because Ukraine is not using humans as a resource as Russia is. Ukraine can send fewer and fewer soldiers to the front lines as long as they can prevent Russians from getting there in the first place. This is no longer a front like WWI with a large number of soldiers sitting in a manned trench looking out against a “no-man’s land.” Instead, we have a very wide grey zone of ~20km (and growing in many places) where drones hunt anything that moves. Only a small number of soldiers from either side actually sit at or even near the point of contact. Russia’s only ability to advance has been sending large numbers of soldiers into the grey zone and hoping enough survive to consolidate control. If drones can mop up all of them, then the advance goes nowhere. If they can’t get large numbers to the front, they can’t advance at all. That’s exactly what the current supply line denial campaign is about. It doesn’t take many Ukrainian soldiers to do it.

The problem with “just cut a deal” is that the deal Russia has insisted on requires Ukraine giving up the most fortified areas of the front, which would leave the entire country exposed if Russia breached it. If they could be 100% sure that giving up the Donbas would result in a lasting peace with Russia letting them be, then I bet they would take it. But there is no way to do that.

Another mistake that many Western observers make is thinking that Russia will seek an exit if they can just “save face.” Puttin doesn’t care about “face” because this is existential for him. The economy will collapse if the war is shut down. War spending is now into double digits of the GDP. He’s in his 70s. This war is his last chance to realize his life dream of reuniting the USSR and becoming “Vlad the Great.” He can’t just accept a fig leaf agreement and let it go because that’s the end of that dream and likely his rule. Even the offer of “just give up the Donbas” probably isn’t real. If Ukraine said “yes”, they’d ask for more because they can’t actually accept a real peace.

Re:To be clear

By korgitser • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Agreed with most of it.

For a nitpick, but also tied to the narrative issues I talked about. The problem I find with the usual take on e.g. shells production, also found in the article you linked, is that while the EU producing shells for Ukraine is obviously good news for Ukraine, somehow North Korea producing shells for Russia is supposed to be bad news for Russia.

The reality is that Ukraine has their allies, and Russia has theirs, and both are good news for their respective war efforts.

And this kind of a thing is everywhere in war reporting. Everything about our side is good for us, everything about their side is bad for them, and nothing is looked into too deeply. My personal favourite - brave and cunning Ukrainians are using the railroads for great success; the reliance on railroad by the dumb and backwards Russians is holding back their war effort. We somehow need to blind ourselves, and hype ourselves up about what’s going on, to keep high morale or whatnot, and in the process, we give up our ability to make honest and accurate assessments about the situation. That Ukraine was severely lacking in shells was known a long time ago to anybody who cared to know, but it took years for Rheinmetall get going. US never increased production, but they did increase prices to eat up all available funding. Had the people known about this on a widespread level, would we have demanded results? Would our governments and industry have delivered? The more cynical among us might find that reality is withheld from the us exactly because our governments don’t want to do anything about it. But reality will come back to bite those who deny it, and will demand back what you owe it with harsh interest.

And we need to talk about the elephant in the room, China. The article claims European shell production might rival China, yet does not quote what Chinese production is. And that’s because there’s basically no known numbers to quote. But China did install 500k/year production capacity in Belarus last year, and they didn’t break a sweat. The idea that Europe might match Chinese production on /anything/ is veering on the edge of absurd to me. Especially so because the CCP can just say that we now do this, and it will have happened, while in the EU there will be years of going through the motions before there’s even any hope of something happening. In our war math we need to consider that China probably cannot afford to have Russia lose, so they will probably not allow Russia to lose, and it will probably not be too much of an effort for them. This also goes for the Ukrainian jets, and drones, and whatnot. If the Russians can not meet the challenge in some field, the Chinese will step up and match the game. Last, but not least, China recently came to market with dirt cheap, $99k hypersonic missiles, while the West basically lacks the rare earths for any missile production at all. Yeah, not good.

It is obvious to me that good information is necessary for good decisions. It’s already bad that the public is widely mis- and underinformed, and fed prepackaged raw emotion and hate minutes instead. But more and more does our leadership also seem to drink their own Kool-Aid. This is not the path to success, but our leadership does not care either. The shit they throw in the fan will not be theirs to clean up.