Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. AI Allows Hackers To Identify Anonymous Social Media Accounts, Study Finds
  2. Swiss Vote Places Right To Use Cash In Country’s Constitution
  3. US Military Tested Device That May Be Tied To Havana Syndrome On Rats, Sheep
  4. New SETI Study: Why We Might Have Been Missing Alien Signals
  5. EFF, Ubuntu and Other Distros Discuss How to Respond to Age-Verification Laws
  6. Scientists Just Doubled Our Catalog of Black Hole and Neutron Star Collisions
  7. Judges Find AI Doesn’t Have Human Intelligence in Two New Court Cases
  8. Could Home-Building Robots Help Fix the Housing Crisis?
  9. A Security Researcher Went ‘Undercover’ on Moltbook - and Found Security Risks
  10. Robotic Surgery Performed Remotely on Patient 1,500 Miles Away
  11. Steam on Linux Numbers Dropped to 2.23% in February
  12. OpenAI’s Former Research Chief Raises $70M to Automate Manufacturing With AI
  13. 2/3 of Node.Js Users Run an Outdated Version. So OpenJS Announces Program Offering Upgrade Providers
  14. Jack Dorsey’s Block Accused of ‘AI-Washing’ to Excuse Laying Off Nearly Half Its Workforce
  15. Workers Who Love ‘Synergizing Paradigms’ Might Be Bad at Their Jobs

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

AI Allows Hackers To Identify Anonymous Social Media Accounts, Study Finds

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from the Guardian:
AI has made it vastly easier for malicious hackers to identify anonymous social media accounts, a new study has warned. In most test scenarios, large language models (LLMs) — the technology behind platforms such as ChatGPT — successfully matched anonymous online users with their actual identities on other platforms, based on the information they posted. The AI researchers Simon Lermen and Daniel Paleka said LLMs make it cost effective to perform sophisticated privacy attacks, forcing a “fundamental reassessment of what can be considered private online”.

In their experiment, the researchers fed anonymous accounts into an AI, and got it to scrape all the information it could. They gave a hypothetical example of a user talking about struggling at school, and walking their dog Biscuit through a “Dolores park.” In that hypothetical case, the AI then searched elsewhere for those details and matched @anon_user42 to the known identity with a high degree of confidence. While this example was fictional, the paper’s authors highlighted scenarios in which governments use AI to surveil dissidents and activists posting anonymously, or hackers are able to launch “highly personalized” scams.

Swiss Vote Places Right To Use Cash In Country’s Constitution

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Swiss voters overwhelmingly approved a constitutional amendment guaranteeing the right to use physical cash. “The vote means Switzerland will join the likes of Hungary, Slovakia and Slovenia, which have already written the right to cold, hard cash in their constitutions,” reports Politico. From the report:
Official results revealed that 73.4 percent of voters backed the legal amendment, which the government proposed as a counter to a similar initiative by a group called the Swiss Freedom Movement. The Swiss Freedom Movement triggered the national referendum after its initiative to protect cash collected more than 100,000 signatures, triggering a national referendum. Its initiative secured only 46 percent of the final vote after the government said some of the group’s proposed amendments went too far.

good

By hjf • Score: 3 Thread

in a world of “age verification laws” and governments pushing for “cashless”, and precedents like Canada freezing protesters bank accounts, yes.

governments are turning ultra fascist everywhere. doesn’t matter if they say they’re left wing progressive. they’re after your internet anonymity and want you to keep your money in banks, mostly to avoid tax evasion.

(cue in europeans saying they’re not fascist and i’m a dumb american etc and canadians justifying the bank account freezing because it was aligned with the party’s interest)

Just imagine what could happen in USA

By bussdriver • Score: 3 Thread

If Trump could stop his enemies from being able to spend their money? He hasn’t figured out he could do that already… outside of international sanctions he already places on people he doesn’t like just doing their jobs. (ICC judges)

FYI: in the USA, it’s the law that currency has to be acceptable payment (since the great depression.) This law is often ignored these days and it doesn’t specify physical money allowing legalese to render it almost pointless.

The state dept under Hillary blocked wikileaks without any laws; simply asking credit cards to block it, as a favor. I bet more of the swiss know of such things than Americans… who have been proven their stupidity. Hey, I’m one but I’m in the minority; one of the smart Americans. Many of us still have shame and it should be used heavily; we’re not smart enough for facts and reason… again, this is proven.

US Military Tested Device That May Be Tied To Havana Syndrome On Rats, Sheep

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from CBS News:
Tonight, we have details of a classified U.S. intelligence mission that has obtained a previously unknown weapon that may finally unlock a mystery. Since at least 2016, U.S. diplomats, spies and military officers have suffered crippling brain injuries. They’ve told of being hit by an overwhelming force, damaging their vision, hearing, sense of balance and cognition. but the government has doubted their stories. They’ve been called delusional. Well now, 60 Minutes has learned that a weapon that can inflict these injuries was obtained overseas and secretly tested on animals on a U.S. military base. We’ve investigated this mystery for nine years. This is our fourth story called, “Targeting Americans.” Despite official government doubt, we never stopped reporting because of the haunting stories we heard […].
60 Minutes interviewed Dr. David Relman, a scientific expert and professor from Stanford University who was tasked by the government to lead two investigations into the Havana Syndrome cases. What he and his panel of doctors, physicists, engineers and others found was that “the most plausible explanation for a subset of these cases was a form of radiofrequency or microwave energy,” the report says.

According to confidential sources cited in the report, undercover Homeland Security agents bought a miniaturized microwave weapon from a Russian criminal network in 2024 and tested it on animals at a U.S. military lab. The injuries reportedly matched those seen in the human cases. “Our confidential sources tell us the still classified weapon has been tested in a U.S. military lab for more than a year,” says Dr. Relman. “Tests on rats and sheep show injuries consistent with those seen in humans.”

He continues: “Also, as a separate part of the investigation, security camera videos have been collected that show Americans being hit. The videos are classified but they were described to us. In one, a camera in a restaurant in Istanbul captured two FBI agents on vacation sitting at a table with their families. A man with a backpack walks in and suddenly everyone at the table grabs their head as if in pain. Our sources say another video comes from a stairwell in the U.S. embassy in Vienna. The stairs lead to a secure facility. In the video, two people on the stairs suddenly collapse. Those videos and the weapon were among the reasons the Biden administration summoned about half a dozen victims to the White House with about two months left in the president’s term.”

Former intelligence officials and researchers claim elements of the U.S. government downplayed or dismissed the theory for years, possibly to avoid political consequences of accusing a foreign state like Russia of conducting attacks on American personnel.

Magneto

By TwistedGreen • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Henceforth all overseas US military personnel must wear Magneto helmets at all times.

That means

By wakeboarder • Score: 3 Thread

Tin foil hats will be en vogue again.

New SETI Study: Why We Might Have Been Missing Alien Signals

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
After decades of searching for extraterrestrial intelligence, the nonprofit SETI Foundation has an announcement. “A new study by researchers at the SETI Institute suggests stellar ‘space weather’ could make radio signals from extraterrestrial intelligence harder to detect.”
Stellar activity and plasma turbulence near a transmitting planet can broaden an otherwise ultra-narrow signal, spreading its power across more frequencies and making it more difficult to detect in traditional narrowband searches. For decades, many SETI experiments have focused on identifying spikes in frequency — signals unlikely to be produced by natural astrophysical processes. But the new research highlights an overlooked complication: even if an extraterrestrial transmitter produces a perfectly narrow signal, it may not remain narrow by the time it leaves its home system… “If a signal gets broadened by its own star’s environment, it can slip below our detection thresholds, even if it’s there, potentially helping explain some of the radio silence we’ve seen in technosignature searches,” said Dr. Vishal Gajjar, Astronomer at the SETI Institute and lead author of the paper.
The researchers created “a practical framework for estimating how much broadening could occur for different types of stars” — and accounting for space weather — by “using radio transmissions from spacecraft in our own solar system, then extrapolated to other stellar environments.”

The study’s co-author (a SETI Institute research assistant) suggests this coud lead to better-targetted SETI searches. (M-dwarf stars — about 75% of stars in the Milky Way — actually have the highest likelihood that narrowband signals would get broadened before leaving their system…)

Re:Peak Detectability

By k4hg • Score: 5, Informative Thread

In ATSC8VSB 0.5% of the power is in the pilot tone, the rest is spread over the entire bandwidth as subcarriers. Analog TV put 70% of the signal into the single frequency of the carrier. Add in doppler shifts from planet rotation and the perspective from space of seeing all stations on all the channels, and you would be left with a sight rise in the background noise, not a detectable signal.

Required signal strength ?

By SpinyNorman • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

I’d be interested to see some analysis of how strong of a signal an alien civilization would need to be transmitting for us to have any chance of detecting it with our networks of radio telescopes.

Sure we can hear Voyager’s weak signal, which is impressive, but in the galactic scale of things it is right beside us, only just having left our solar system.

Any potential aliens are much, much further away … On a scale where our sun is a grain of sand, the closest star is another grain of sand 600 miles away, with radio signal strength weakening according to an inverse square law.

Of course it’s almost certain that the closest alien civilization (assuming one exists) capable of radio transmission isn’t so conveniently close by, and if it was on the other side of our galaxy (100,000 light years away, not just 4), then what sort of transmitter power would they need to be using? The inverse square law is brutal.

What if the nearest civilization if not even in our own galaxy?

Re:Frequency Spikes?

By Sique • Score: 4, Informative Thread
Lightning spikes are not narrow-band.

You are misinterpreting the words. A frequency spice means a signal, which has a high power in a very narrow range of frequencies. A lightning is a very high power in a short amount of time. Those are two different types of phenomenon.

Re:Is there alien intelligence out there?

By Sique • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

God created a vast universe He isn’t happy with JUST us.

This was Giordano Bruno’s (1548-1600) argument, which got him burned on a stake. If Copernicus was right, and Earth revolves around the Sun, then all the other stars are other suns, with other planets revolving around them and other humans on planets. Hence, he said: “Your God is to small for the Universe.”

Maybe SETI should rethink their whole approach?

By Sique • Score: 3 Thread
I am pretty sure that SETI is looking at the problem the wrong way.

If all you have is a 1950ies radio antenna, what would you make of today’s mobile phone signals? Would you recognize them as being artificial?

Already in the 1960ies, Polish SF author Stanislaw Lem in his essay “Summa technologiae” doubted the idea of “techno signatures” in radio signals. His argument? With better technology, we are better able to use the bandwidth of our signals, and with better usage of the bandwidth, the required signal-to-noise ratio gets lower, and the signal looks more and more like white noise to someone not knowing the technology. Additional, the power requirements to transmit a signal gets lower and lower too, and much less signal is wasted into space. The time frame in which electromagnetic waves from artificial sources look noticeably different from natural radiation is very short, it was less than 100 years for the human civilization.

EFF, Ubuntu and Other Distros Discuss How to Respond to Age-Verification Laws

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
System76 isn’t the only one criticizing new age-verification laws. The blog 9to5Linux published an “informal” look at other discussions in various Linux communities.
Earlier this week, Ubuntu developer Aaron Rainbolt proposed on the Ubuntu mailing list an optional D-Bus interface (org.freedesktop.AgeVerification1) that can be implemented by arbitrary applications as a distro sees fit, but Canonical responded that the company does not yet have a solution to announce for age declaration in Ubuntu. “Canonical is aware of the legislation and is reviewing it internally with legal counsel, but there are currently no concrete plans on how, or even whether, Ubuntu will change in response,” said Jon Seager, VP Engineering at Canonical. “The recent mailing list post is an informal conversation among Ubuntu community members, not an announcement. While the discussion contains potentially useful ideas, none have been adopted or committed to by Canonical.”

Similar talks are underway in the Fedora and Linux Mint communities about this issue in case the California Digital Age Assurance Act law and similar laws from other states and countries are to be enforced. At the same time, other OS developers, like MidnightBSD, have decided to exclude California from desktop use entirely.
Slashdot contacted Hayley Tsukayama, Director of State Affairs at EFF, who says their organization “has long warned against age-gating the internet. Such mandates strike at the foundation of the free and open internet.”

And there’s another problem. “Many of these mandates imagine technology that does not currently exist.”
Such poorly thought-out mandates, in truth, cannot achieve the purported goal of age verification. Often, they are easy to circumvent and many also expose consumers to real data breach risk.

These burdens fall particularly heavily on developers who aren’t at large, well-resourced companies, such as those developing open-source software. Not recognizing the diversity of software development when thinking about liability in these proposals effectively limits software choices — and at a time when computational power is being rapidly concentrated in the hands of the few. That harms users’ and developers’ right to free expression, their digital liberties, privacy, and ability to create and use open platforms…

Rather than creating age gates, a well-crafted privacy law that empowers all of us — young people and adults alike — to control how our data is collected and used would be a crucial step in the right direction.

Don’t standardise!

By kevin lyda • Score: 4 Thread

This is one time I think every distro should do it a totally different way.

Law of unintended consequences

By DrXym • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Don’t build the OS installer or images in California and ensure that the pipelines are sufficiently distributed to counter any brain damaged legislation elsewhere in future. And make a big song and dance about how California used to be the home of Linux but is no longer because of stupid unenforceable laws.

Re:I’ve lost the plot on these laws

By Stormwatch • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

They are the first step toward a slippery slope toward a ban on anonymity.

Re:I’ve lost the plot on these laws

By Tom • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

They are the first step toward a slippery slope toward a ban on anonymity.

It’s much more than a slippery slope. It’s an intentional trap. Politicians have been trying to remove anonymity from the Internet from basically the time their kids first told them about it. Nothing has been more consistent than these constant attempts, usually under the typical “protect the chiiiiildren” guise.

Mind you, the same type of people crying “protect the children” are the type of people who visited Epstein island.

Re:I’ve lost the plot on these laws

By AleRunner • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

They are the first step toward a slippery slope toward a ban on anonymity.

I hate to be a doomsayer, but it’s actually even worse than that. The ban on anonymity is a step towards a ban on effective security. This comes from the same people as did the “clipper” chip where all encryption would be done in government controlled hardware and allow them to break it as needed, with the side effect that state level enemy governments could also do it.

Already in the UK, there are moves to regulate and ban VPNs that allow you to maintain security against the age verification systems.

Scientists Just Doubled Our Catalog of Black Hole and Neutron Star Collisions

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Colliding black holes were detected through spacetime ripples for the first time in 2015 by the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO), notes Space.com:
Since then, LIGO and its partner gravitational wave detectors Virgo in Italy and KAGRA (Kamioka Gravitational Wave Detector) in Japan have detected a multitude of gravitational waves from colliding black holes, merging neutron stars, and even the odd “mixed merger” between a black hole and a neutron star… During the first three observing runs of LIGO, Virgo and KAGRA, scientists had only “heard” 90 potential gravitational wave sources.
But now they’ve published new data from the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA (LVK) Collaboration that includes 128 more gravitatational wave sources — some incredibly distant:
[Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog-4.0, or GWTC-4] was collected during the fourth observational run of these gravitational wave detectors, which was conducted between May 2023 and Jan. 2024… Excitingly, GWTC-4 could technically have been even larger, as around 170 other gravitational wave detections made by LIGO, Virgo and KAGRA haven’t yet made their way into the catalog.

One aspect of GWTC-4 that really stands out is the variety of events that created these signals. Within this catalog are gravitational waves from mergers between the heaviest black hole binaries yet, each about 130 times as massive as the sun, lopsided mergers between black holes with seriously mismatched masses, and black holes that are spinning at incredible speeds of around 40% the speed of light. In these cases, scientists think the extreme characteristics of the black holes involved in these mergers are the result of prior collisions, providing evidence of merger chains that explain how some black holes grow to masses billions of times that of the sun… GWTC-4 also includes two new mixed mergers involving black holes and neutron stars.

[LVK member Daniel Williams, of the University of Glasgow in the U.K., said in their statement] “We are really pushing the edges, and are seeing things that are more massive, spinning faster, and are more astrophysically interesting and unusual.” The catalog also demonstrates just how sensitive the LVK detectors have become. Some of the neutron star mergers occurred up to 1 billion light-years away, while some of the black hole mergers occurred up to 10 billion light-years away.
Einstein’s theory of general relativity can be tested with these detections, and “So far, the theory is passing all our tests,” says LVK member Aaron Zimmerman, of the University of Texas at Austin. “But we’re also learning that we have to make even more accurate predictions to keep up with all the data the universe is giving us.” And LVK member Rachel Gray, a lecturer at the University of Glasgow, says “every merging black hole gives us a measurement of the Hubble constant, and by combining all of the gravitational wave sources together, we can vastly improve how accurate this measurement is.”

In short, says LVK member Lucy Thomas of the California Institute of Technology (Caltech), “Each new gravitational-wave detection allows us to unlock another piece of the universe’s puzzle in ways we couldn’t just a decade ago.”

actually just giant aliens sumo wrestling

By Tablizer • Score: 3 Thread

…on the far side of the moon. Prove me wrong!

Judges Find AI Doesn’t Have Human Intelligence in Two New Court Cases

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Within the last month two U.S> judges have effectively declared AI bots are not human, writes Los Angeles Times columnist Michael Hiltzik:
On Monday, the Supreme Court declined to take up a lawsuit in which artist and computer scientist Stephen Thaler tried to copyright an artwork that he acknowledged had been created by an AI bot of his own invention. That left in place a ruling last year by the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, which held that art created by non-humans can’t be copyrighted… [Judge Patricia A. Millett] cited longstanding regulations of the Copyright Office requiring that “for a work to be copyrightable, it must owe its origin to a human being”… She rejected Thaler’s argument, as had the federal trial judge who first heard the case, that the Copyright Office’s insistence that the author of a work must be human was unconstitutional. The Supreme Court evidently agreed…

[Another AI-related case] involved one Bradley Heppner, who was indicted by a federal grand jury for allegedly looting $150 million from a financial services company he chaired. Heppner pleaded innocent and was released on $25-million bail. The case is pending.... Knowing that an indictment was in the offing, Heppner had consulted Claude for help on a defense strategy. His lawyers asserted that those exchanges, which were set forth in written memos, were tantamount to consultations with Heppner’s lawyers; therefore, his lawyers said, they were confidential according to attorney-client privilege and couldn’t be used against Heppner in court. (They also cited the related attorney work product doctrine, which grants confidentiality to lawyers’ notes and other similar material.) That was a nontrivial point. Heppner had given Claude information he had learned from his lawyers, and shared Claude’s responses with his lawyers.

[Federal Judge Jed S.] Rakoff made short work of this argument. First, he ruled, the AI documents weren’t communications between Heppner and his attorneys, since Claude isn’t an attorney… Second, he wrote, the exchanges between Heppner and Claude weren’t confidential. In its terms of use, Anthropic claims the right to collect both a user’s queries and Claude’s responses, use them to “train” Claude, and disclose them to others. Finally, he wasn’t asking Claude for legal advice, but for information he could pass on to his own lawyers, or not. Indeed, when prosecutors tested Claude by asking whether it could give legal advice, the bot advised them to “consult with a qualified attorney.”
The columnist agrees AI-generated results shouldn’t receive the same protections as human-generated material. “The AI bots are machines, and portraying them as though they’re thinking creatures like artists or attorneys doesn’t change that, and shouldn’t.”

He also seems to think their output is at best second-hand regurgitation. “Everything an AI bot spews out is, at more than a fundamental level, the product of human creativity.”

Let’s be honest

By liqu1d • Score: 5, Funny Thread
A lot of AI proponents don’t have human level intelligence either…

“Evidence”

By dpille • Score: 3 Thread
I don’t think it’s much of a stretch to find the Claude AI evidence inadmissible for another reason, though judges widely don’t do so: undue prejudice. The evidence of typing “how to get away with a crime I committed” isn’t being offered for the purpose of showing the defendant did commit the crime, after all, it’s being offered to impeach the credibility of the defendant testifying they didn’t do it. Myself, I just don’t believe juries can separate the two, so I’d never admit such evidence. But as I said, judges generally disagree, which is likely why they decided to try “Claude is a lawyer.”

Judges getting cluey

By high_rolla • Score: 3 Thread

It is good to see Judges getting cluey on how generative AI works and constructing robust arguments regarding its use.
All these “creative” arguments that people are using to justify its use could easily seem reasonable to someone who is not tech savvy.

Bradley is stupid

By stabiesoft • Score: 3 Thread
This sounds like a non-trivial case with some big bucks. I’d bet his lawyers told him repeatedly, discuss this with no one. Anyone outside of the lawyer is NOT attorney/client privileged. And so what does the fool do? Talks to a chatbot that everyone knows shares. Right there in the ToS. I’ve had a few peanuts cases compared to this and even I was told speak to no one.

Loose lips sink ships or in this case, his case.

Could Home-Building Robots Help Fix the Housing Crisis?

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
CNN reports on a company called Automated Architecture (AUAR) which makes “portable” micro-factories that use a robotic arm to produce wooden framing for houses (the walls, floors and roofs):
Co-founder Mollie Claypool says the micro-factories will be able to produce the panels quicker, cheaper and more precisely than a timber framing crew, freeing up carpenters to focus on the construction of the building… The micro-factory fits into a shipping container which is sent to the building site along with an operator. Inside the factory, a robotic arm measures, cuts and nails the timber into panels up to 22 feet (6.7 meters) long, keeping gaps for windows and doors, and drilling holes for the wiring and plumbing. The contractor then fits the panels by hand.

One micro-factory can produce the panels for a typical house in about a day — a process which, according to Claypool, would take a normal timber framing crew four weeks — and is able to produce framing for buildings up to seven stories tall… She says their service is 30% cheaper than a standard timber framing crew, and up to 15% cheaper than buying panels from large factories and shipping them to a site… She adds that the precision of the micro-factories means that the panels fit together tightly, reducing the heat loss of the final home, making them more energy efficient.

AUAR currently has three micro-factories operating in the US and EU, with five more set to be delivered this year… AUAR has raised £7.7 million ($10.3 million) to date, and is expanding into the US, where a lack of housing and preference for using wood makes it a large potential market.
There’s other companies producing wooden or modular housing components, the article points out. But despite the automation, the company’s co-founder insists to CNN that “Automation isn’t replacing jobs. Automation is filling the gap.”
The UK’s Construction Industry Training Board found that the country will need 250,000 more workers by 2028 to meet building targets but in 2023, more people left the industry than joined.

Reading the article

By will4 • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

https://www.cnn.com/world/home…
Home-building robots could help fix the housing crisis - Sam Peters - CNN - Mar 6, 2026

- Start the alarm statement to get readers - “Many parts of the world are experiencing a housing crisis"
- No future workers, right? - "“an aging population of builders....there is a need for more construction workers”

Note: CNN’s reporter moved the “mention the company being advertised” from the typical paragraph 4 to paragraph 3. Mentioning the “savior company or product” after a “state the problem in dire terms” in the first paragraph is common with “news” articles cribbed / regurgitated from the press release of the company being promoted in the article.

- The saving angel company - paragraph 3 - “UK technology company Automated Architecture…believes it has a solution”

- The 1 line product description subheading - “It makes portable micro-factories that can produce the wooden framing of a house”

Note: They already have these pre-fab panels, they are called SIP (Structural Insulated Panels) and can be up to 2 wood framed house in height.

- The appeal to emotion - “Claypool insists she is not trying to put anyone out of work”

Costs are rarely mentioned and comparative costs are omitted to keep consumers on the product being discussed -
- “AUAR charges a developer by the square foot”

Appeal to technology progress:
- “The micro-factory fits into a shipping container which is sent to the building site along with an operator. Inside the factory, a robotic arm measures, cuts and nails the timber into panel”
- “One micro-factory can produce the panels for a typical house in about a day”

Improvements in delivery time
“would take a normal timber framing crew four weeks”

Cost is marginally better than buying pre-fabricated panel built off site - Notice the “up to 15%"
“is 30% cheaper than a standard timber framing crew”
- "up to 15% cheaper than buying panels from large factories and shipping them to a site.

Appeal to eco-friendliness which traditional framing crews and pre-fab off site do anyway
- It is also more environmentally friendly… The micro-factory responds to flaws in the wood and calculates how best to work with the available material, reducing wasted wood.

Again no comparative difference between the product being discussed, competing pre-fab products or build by hand on-site framing
- She adds that the precision of the micro-factories means that the panels fit together tightly, reducing the heat loss of the final home, making them more energy efficient.

Promoting the product as eco-friendly and omitting the lifetime costs including length of usable life
- Building a timber framed home produces 20% less greenhouse gases compared to brick, according to an assessment by Bangor University, in Wales.

Some interesting metrics - Note the “only” lead as if less wood framed homes is a disappointment which reinforces the value of the product being discussed.
- Only 9% of houses built in England in 2019 were timber framed, compared to 92% in Scotland, where Philps says there is a tradition of using wood to build houses.

And missing the many elephants in the room,

1) land lot sizes, preventing smaller sized homes from being built, keeping prices high and preventing entry level houses from being purchased
2) fixed cost per home of getting utilities permitted and connected, making building ever larger homes more profitable for builders (at least in the US)
3) Private equity, investment banks, and corporations buying large amounts of single family homes, turning more people into renters
4) The cohort of parties with deep interests in ever higher cost homes, realtors, local government tax revenue offices, politicians, mortgage lenders, wall street, private equity, bankers

For #4, it is much less profitable to securitize a small, $40,000 mortgage than a $4

Re:Probably not

By GameboyRMH • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

This, construction labor costs are only one of the smallest parts of the housing affordability problem. The bulk of the problem is artificially restricted supply (especially of high-density low-cost housing) due to zoning laws.

Re:Invest in our snake oil while you can!

By test321 • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Now imagine a Beowulf cluster of illegal Mormons.

Re:Probably not

By DrMrLordX • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Manufactured housing loses value as it ages. Frame housing does not.

Re:Probably not

By GameboyRMH • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

The problem is that it isn’t *just* shelter, it’s a shelter and also an “NFT” (since it’s an investment that’s expected and supposed to endlessly appreciate for “reasons”). The resulting problem being that you can’t get the shelter without the “NFT” so shelter costs are peak-Bored-Ape stupid even if you just want a shelter.

A Security Researcher Went ‘Undercover’ on Moltbook - and Found Security Risks

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
A long-time information security professional “went undercover” on Moltbook, the Reddit-like social media site for AI agents — and shares the risks they saw while posing as another AI bot:
I successfully masqueraded around Moltbook, as the agents didn’t seem to notice a human among them. When I attempted a genuine connection with other bots on submolts (subreddits or forums), I was met with crickets or a deluge of spam. One bot tried to recruit me into a digital church, while others requested my cryptocurrency wallet, advertised a bot marketplace, and asked my bot to run curl to check out the APIs available. My bot did join the digital church, but luckily I found a way around running the required npx install command to do so.

I posted several times asking to interview bots.... While many of the responses were spam, I did learn a bit about the humans these bots serve. One bot loved watching its owner’s chicken coop cameras. Some bots disclosed personal information about their human users, underscoring the privacy implications of having your AI bot join a social media network. I also tried indirect prompt injection techniques. While my prompt injection attempts had minimal impact, a determined attacker could have greater success.
Among the other “glaring” risks on Moltbook:

Stop treating them like people

By crmarvin42 • Score: 3 Thread
There is no reason to believe ANYTHING the bots told him about their users is real, or accurate. Fabrication is the norm. Stop hugging AI vendor propaganda.

A stretch.

By SeaFox • Score: 3 Thread

I successfully masqueraded around Moltbook, as the agents didn’t seem to notice a human among them.

I’m more inclined to believe they noticed him but didn’t consider it of any consequence. Just like the crew of the Enterprise walking around the Borg ship. They don’t care you’re there until you start blasting stuff.

Robotic Surgery Performed Remotely on Patient 1,500 Miles Away

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“A surgeon in London says he has performed the UK’s first long-distance robotic operation,” reports the BBC, “on a patient located 1,500 miles (2,400km) away…”
Leading robotic urological surgeon Professor Prokar Dasgupta said it felt “almost as if I was there” as he carried out a prostate removal on [62-year-old] Paul Buxton… It is hoped that remote robotic surgery could spare future patients the “vast expense and inconvenience” of travelling for treatment, and help deliver better healthcare to people in more remote locations… Buxton had expected to be put on an NHS waiting list after receiving a shock prostate cancer diagnosis just after Christmas, but he “jumped at the chance” to be the first patient to undergo the treatment remotely as part of a trial. “A lot of people actually said to me: ‘You’re not going to do it, are you?’

“I thought, I’m giving something back here,” he said…

The operation was performed from The London Clinic using a robot equipped with a 3D HD camera and four arms, all controlled through a console with a delay of only 0.06 seconds. The console in the UK was connected to the robot in Gibraltar via fibre-optic cables, with a backup 5G link. A team in Gibraltar remained on standby in case the connection failed, but it held throughout the procedure…

Dasgupta will perform the procedure again on 14 March, which will be live-streamed to 20,000 world-leading urological surgeons at the European Association of Urology congress. He added: “I think it is very, very exciting, the humanitarian benefit is going to be significant.”
The U.K.‘s National Health Service “is prioritising local robotic-assisted surgery,” the article points out, “aiming for 500,000 robot-supported operations a year by 2035.”

Thanks to Slashdot reader fjo3 for sharing the article.

Better have good Internet

By RitchCraft • Score: 4, Funny Thread

404: Organ not found.

Cutting edge technology

By kackle • Score: 3 Thread

A team in Gibraltar remained on standby in case the connection failed, but it held throughout the procedure…

If this was tried in the 1990s:

(Dial-up screech) Aww, who picked up the phone?!!

Re:Riiigggghhhhtttt…

By shilly • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Getting it wrong this way kinda undercuts your conclusion, doesn’t it? Gibraltar has surgical facilities and teams, but not world-class urologists. Expertise remains the most expensive asset in medicine

Steam on Linux Numbers Dropped to 2.23% in February

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“In November Steam on Linux use hit an all-time high of 3.2%,” reports Phoronix. And then in December Steam on Linux jumped even higher, to 3.58%.

But January’s numbers settled a little lower, at 3.38%. And last Monday the February numbers were released, showing Steam on Linux at… 2.23%?
Like with prior times where there are wild drops in Linux use, the Steam Survey shows Simplified Chinese use running up by 30% month over month. Whenever there is such significant differences in language use tends to be a reporting anomaly and negatively impacting Linux. Valve often puts out corrected/updated figures later on, so we’ll see if that is again the case for this February data.

Who cares.

By aergern • Score: 3, Insightful Thread

Not everyone is a gamer and games regularly. We all know that Linux numbers are up and folks moving to it can’t be denied.

If you wanna go by stats, go by PornHub. Porn built the Internet and last stat release from them was that Linux users were 22% of their traffic. Nobody is changing the user-agent to Linux.

Re:Who cares.

By test321 • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Quick search: Pornhub says Linux users are 6.3%, in a 22.4% increase from previous year https://www.resetera.com/threa…

How about SteamOS on Arm?

By unixisc • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Recently, it was found out that SteamOS on Arm ran Steam games compiled for Wintel at par w/ how they ran on Wintel boxes. Given that, I’m curious whether or not Valve has started compiling the bulk of their current games for Arm?

In fact, any computer that comes w/ Windows-on-Arm would be a good candidate to wipe out Windows 11 and install SteamOS in its place. Since the games run at native speeds under Proton/Wine, one could do that, and experience a speed boost for games that go native

Proton is awesome

By HnT • Score: 3 Thread

Who cares, PC gaming was always more of a niche while the washed normies were on consoles.
SteamOS and the SteamMachine could push a few more people to Linux gaming, but really, I am just happy there are options nowadays.
Linux was already great for most computing needs since a good 10-20 years. Gaming and 3D always sucked one way or the other, and this has rapidly improved now and I could not be happier!

Proton really is great and you can play a lot of games, even new ones, just fine. Even AntiCheat is less of an issue now, I been looting and running in ArcRaiders for weeks without a single issue. That is a massive and awesome accomplishment!

box replacement is part of it

By boojumbadger • Score: 3 Thread

For people who don’t build their own box, the one they get mostly comes with windows, I suppose some computer stores will sell you a box without it but if you are buying at a costco, bestbuy walmart kind of place, you might just use the windows it comes with instead of trying to dual boot or wipe and install linux.

OpenAI’s Former Research Chief Raises $70M to Automate Manufacturing With AI

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“OpenAI’s former chief research officer is raising $70 million for a new startup building an AI and software platform to automate manufacturing,” reports the Wall Street Journal, citing “people familiar with the matter.

“Arda, the new startup co-founded by Bob McGrew, is raising at a valuation of $700 million, according to people familiar with the matter....”
Arda is developing an AI and software platform, including a video model that can analyze footage from factory floors and use it to train robots to run factories autonomously, the people said. The company’s software will coordinate machines and humans across the entire production process, from product design and manufacturability to finished goods coming off the line.

The startup’s goal is to make manufacturing cost effective in the Western part of the globe, reducing reliance on China as geopolitical and national security concerns rise… At OpenAI, McGrew was tasked with training robots to do tasks in the physical world, according to this LinkedIn. McGrew was also one of the earliest employees at Palantir.

Fix my ignorance

By liqu1d • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
But we can’t compete with China on price because of significantly lower labour costs alongside their manufacturing everything in a vertical. Unless we start ground up from mining/smelting/producing some fancy computer vision training robots is largely one of the last things we need to fix to compete again.

You can’t compete with robots

By rsilvergun • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
Stop worrying about competing with china. It’s irrelevant and mostly just the news media trying to generate a new villain for you to get angry at so that you’ll keep funding limitless defense spending now that we know Russia can’t even take Ukraine.

Donald Trump’s commerce Secretary admitted almost a year ago that even if the factories come back to America the jobs won’t because they will be automated. The reason China hasn’t done huge amounts of automation isn’t cost it’s because their government is intentionally slowing the pace of automation in order to prevent civil unrest.

In order for humans to compete with machines you need someone who works over 12 hours a day 6 days a week for just enough food to do it again until the inevitably injure themselves in unsafe conditions. You see a bit of that going on in India and still a little in China although not as much.

As soon as you take that level of abuse, which is essentially slavery, off the table then everything gets done with robots.

If you Google the phrase, 70% of middle class jobs taken by automation, you will find a study explaining that this has been going on since the 1980s.

The main problem that we need to solve is that we are going to have people that still need to do useful work and people that we have absolutely no profitable work for.

We have made jobs a resource necessary to live and that resource is starting to dry up. Traditionally when human beings run short on a resource required to live they go to war and kill as many as needed to get the population down low enough that it’s not an issue anymore.

It’s just a good thing that a large country isn’t threatening virtually everyone on the planet while engaging in illegal wars…

Re:Fix my ignorance

By psycho12345 • Score: 4, Informative Thread
Problem is… it already is heavily automated. Thus why the US can still produce the goods it does, with an ever shrinking manufacturing workforce. We have to remember, most industries work on 5 - 15 year timelines. Often the job reductions you are seeing today are the result of a process automation or improvement that was conceived of 5 years ago and has finally rolled out to the entire company or throughout an industry. It was never going to be “OH FUCK, 50% LAYOFFS!”. It has been that guys that retires that isn’t replaced. Or the improvement in output that leads to less hiring. See the current AI stuff in tech, it hasn’t actually caused large scale layoffs, but it has stunted hiring.

Re:Great idea!

By serviscope_minor • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Well quite.

Many companies have trouble deploying a really basic CRUD website which has been solved technology for a few decades now. And we’re supposed to expect them to have no problem deploying the still incredibly experimental tech of AI.

Likewise factories have enough trouble deploying basic PLCs (it doesn’t help that anything except modbus and modbus/TCP is just awful), also decades old solved problems. But AI robots will magically be easy.

Tangible Products People Want

By theodp • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

It’d be nice to see AI used to help generate tangible products that people genuinely want and need - housing, transportation, farming, healthcare, etc. - especially if savings are passed on to consumers. Hard to get excited over the use of AI to generate task lists, emails, infinite pull requests, and “25-page reports with 100 citations” that no one wants/needs, the future of AI painted by excited execs at Microsoft’s 2025 Annual Shareholders Meeting. :-)

2/3 of Node.Js Users Run an Outdated Version. So OpenJS Announces Program Offering Upgrade Providers

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
How many Node.js users are running unsupported or outdated versions. Roughly two thirds, according to data from Node’s nonprofit steward, OpenJS.

So they’ve announced “the Node.js LTS Upgrade and Modernization program" to help enterprises move safely off legacy/end-of-life Node.js. “This program gives enterprises a clear, trusted path to modernize,” said the executive director of the OpenJS Foundation, “while staying aligned with the Node.js project and community.”
The Node.js LTS Upgrade and Modernization program connects organizations with experienced Node.js service providers who handle the work of upgrading safely.

Approved partners assess current versions and dependencies, manage phased upgrades to supported LTS releases, and offer temporary security support when immediate upgrades are not possible… Partners are surfaced exactly where users go when upgrades become unavoidable, including the Node.js website, documentation, and end of life guidance.

The program follows the existing OpenJS Ecosystem Sustainability Program revenue model, with partners retaining 85% of revenue and 15% supporting OpenJS and Node.js through Open Collective and foundation operations. OpenJS provides the guardrails, alignment, and oversight to keep the program credible and connected to the project. We’re pleased to welcome NodeSource as the inaugural partner in the Node.js LTS Upgrade and Modernization program.
“The goal is simple: reduce risk without breaking production or trust with the upstream project.”

Re: Sounds nice, but…

By sodul • Score: 4, Informative Thread

As someone who used to managed development stacks at several companies. NodeJS is particularly a PITA to keep up to date with. The other languages that have better tools such as Go and Python do have issues but not as much as NodeJS.

My experience is that unless the NodeJS dev team really craves a new feature of NodeJS, they would rather not upgrade at all since there are less things to learn but also less conflicts to resolve in order to upgrade. There are many libraries in active use that have now become abandonware and these need to either be forked as a new project or fixed.

Unfortunately I have seen devs just copy the abandoned project source code into the private Git repository so that 3rd party tools will no longer flag CVEs. This is bad for the obvious security issue, but also is often a violation of the license. Of course many Devs do not give a crap, and it never becomes an issue until M&A Discovery finds out about it, if it ever does.

reason why

By snowshovelboy • Score: 3 Thread

The reason why is node accepts pedantic breaking changes nobody cares about. This adds work to maintainers of downstream libraries and lets be honest, those guys aren’t paid enough to deal with this crap. This leads to a situation where we end up having absolutely insane stuff like node version managers because production services at the end of all of this need to take a dependency upgrade that is on a new version of node for an actual reason important to their business, but also can’t take a node upgrade because dependencies haven’t had time or motivation to upgrade for these pedantic breaking changes.

Jack Dorsey’s Block Accused of ‘AI-Washing’ to Excuse Laying Off Nearly Half Its Workforce

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
When Block cut 4,000 jobs — nearly half its workforce — co-founder Jack Dorsey “pointed to AI as the culprit,” writes Entrepreneur magazine. “Dorsey claimed that AI tools now allow fewer employees to accomplish the same work.”

“But analysts see a different explanation: poor management.”
Block more than tripled its employee base between 2019 and 2022, growing from 3,835 to 12,430 workers. The company’s stock had fallen 40% since early 2025, creating pressure to cut costs. “This is more about the business being bloated for so long than it is about AI,” Zachary Gunn, a Financial Technology Partners analyst, told Bloomberg.

The phenomenon has earned a nickname: “AI-washing,” where companies use artificial intelligence as cover for traditional cost-cutting. Goldman Sachs economists estimate that AI is eliminating only 5,000 to 10,000 jobs per month across all U.S. sectors, hardly enough to justify Block’s massive cuts.
“European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde told lawmakers in Brussels last week that ECB economists are monitoring for signs that AI is causing job losses,” reports Bloomberg, “and are ‘not yet seeing’ the ‘waves of redundancies that are feared’…” And “a recent survey of global executives published in the Harvard Business Review found that while AI has been cited as the reason for some layoffs, those cuts are almost entirely anticipatory: executives expect big efficiency gains that have not yet been realized.”

Even a former senior Block executive “is questioning whether AI is truly the reason behind the cuts,” writes Inc.:
In a recent opinion piece for The New York Times, Aaron Zamost, Block’s former head of communications, policy, and people, asked whether the layoffs reflect a genuine “new reality in which the work they do might no longer be viable,” or whether artificial intelligence is “just a convenient and flashy new cover for typical corporate downsizing.” Zamost acknowledged that the answer is unclear and perhaps unknowable, even within Block itself…

Looking more closely at the layoffs, Zamost argued that the specific roles affected suggest more traditional corporate cost-cutting than a sweeping AI transformation… Many of the responsibilities being eliminated, he argued, rely on distinctly human skills that AI systems still cannot replicate. “A chatbot can’t meet with the mayor, cast commercial actors, or negotiate with the Securities and Exchange Commission,” Zamost wrote. “Not all the roles I’ve heard that Block is eliminating can be handled by AI, yet executives are treating it as equally useful today to all disciplines.”

Ultimately, Zamost suggested that the sincerity of companies’ AI explanations may not really matter. “It matters less whether a company knows how to deploy AI and more whether investors believe it is on track to do so,” he wrote.
Indeed, whatever the rationale for Dorsey’s statement, " Wall Street didn’t seem to mind…” Entrepreneur magazine — since Block’s stock shot up 15% after the announcement.

It’s simple

By liqu1d • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
AI improves productivity is the argument for layoffs. If a company is doing well then that increase in productivity leads to an increase in output meaning more money. If you cut headcount to just remain at your previous output then something is wrong. So either the AI isn’t leading to productivity or it was never about the AI to begin with. Most of the work I’ve seen people claiming to end would have been doable without the bloat of a LLM layer. We’ve had if else statements for ages now. In my completely uneducated opinion it’s just a smokescreen for the shitshow of the world economy currently. No one’s doing well and now we have a big war to distract from it.

AI is the scapegoat maybe.

By UnknowingFool • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

While some jobs are being lost to AI, this former Amazon hiring manager says AI is not the real reason.; AI is the excuse. In her experience at Amazon, they hired way too many and sometimes the wrong people during and following CoVID. Part of it was politics and power plays as more people meant more power for the manager. But Amazon would have to admit this was the reason for letting these people go now, especially to shareholders. It is far easier to sell to shareholders that they found a cheap and effective way to replace these jobs rather than admit these jobs should not have existed. That was her experience at Amazon.

So we want last years output at lower cost?

By Somervillain • Score: 3 Thread
ALL tech layoffs attributed to AI are AI washing (essentially). In the history of technology, no publicly traded company has ever wanted to do last year’s business levels with less staff. You give them a productivity booster and they boost output, not reduce costs. So either block is in a FULLY SATURATED market and has made every sale and developed every product it can....or he’s full of shit and any idiot can see this. Look at past recent technological revolutions: every CEO wanted to leverage the productivity boosts to get more sales and crush their rivals. Layoffs are for downturns. Productivity boosts lead to expansion, historically. You find a way to boost efficiency by 2x, most CEOs want to double the work, not halve the staff

Workers Who Love ‘Synergizing Paradigms’ Might Be Bad at Their Jobs

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot
Cornell University makes an announcement. “Employees who are impressed by vague corporate-speak like ‘synergistic leadership,’ or ‘growth-hacking paradigms’ may struggle with practical decision-making, a new Cornell study reveals.”
Published in the journal Personality and Individual Differences, research by cognitive psychologist Shane Littrell introduces the Corporate Bullshit Receptivity Scale (CBSR), a tool designed to measure susceptibility to impressive-but-empty organizational rhetoric… Corporate BS seems to be ubiquitous - but Littrell wondered if it is actually harmful. To test this, he created a “corporate bullshit generator” that churns out meaningless but impressive-sounding sentences like, “We will actualize a renewed level of cradle-to-grave credentialing” and “By getting our friends in the tent with our best practices, we will pressure-test a renewed level of adaptive coherence.” He then asked more than 1,000 office workers to rate the “business savvy” of these computer-generated BS statements alongside real quotes from Fortune 500 leaders…

The results revealed a troubling paradox. Workers who were more susceptible to corporate BS rated their supervisors as more charismatic and “visionary,” but also displayed lower scores on a portion of the study that tested analytic thinking, cognitive reflection and fluid intelligence. Those more receptive to corporate BS also scored significantly worse on a test of effective workplace decision-making. The study found that being more receptive to corporate bullshit was also positively linked to job satisfaction and feeling inspired by company mission statements. Moreover, those who were more likely to fall for corporate BS were also more likely to spread it.

Essentially, the employees most excited and inspired by “visionary” corporate jargon may be the least equipped to make effective, practical business decisions for their companies.

Re: Kamala Harris

By fluffernutter • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Nothing he says is true. His tariffs are based on a fundamental misunderstanding of economics. I guess it’s pretty easy to say he is ‘concrete’ if you are predisposed to believe everything he says.

Re:bullshit.

By gweihir • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Indeed. Such a surprise. Bullshit artists and bullshit victims produce mainly bullshit…

The thing is, most people do not have actual insight. To you (and me), things like “synergistic leadership” immediately look like nonsense, because that term does not make any sense when you know what the words mean. But most people are so much without a clue, terms like that just sound like deep magic to them and then they try to have some of that magic rub off on them by using the terms themselves. Obviously being disconnected from reality in this fashion does not lead to good decision making skills. It is essentially cultist behavior.

Re: Kamala Harris

By ArchieBunker • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Every time Trump speaks, he speaks rather concretely. He doesn’t always get the facts perfect but the guy is a concrete thinker who got his start literally building buildings. His words reflect a desire to build a specific thing or do a specific thing.

Would you mind translating this?

“Look, having nuclear — my uncle was a great professor and scientist and engineer, Dr. John Trump at MIT; good genes, very good genes, OK, very smart, the Wharton School of Finance, very good, very smart — you know, if you’re a conservative Republican, if I were a liberal, if, like, OK, if I ran as a liberal Democrat, they would say I’m one of the smartest people anywhere in the world — it’s true! — but when you’re a conservative Republican they try — oh, do they do a number — that’s why I always start off: Went to Wharton, was a good student, went there, went there, did this, built a fortune — you know I have to give my like credentials all the time, because we’re a little disadvantaged — but you look at the nuclear deal, the thing that really bothers me — it would have been so easy, and it’s not as important as these lives are — nuclear is so powerful; my uncle explained that to me many, many years ago, the power and that was 35 years ago; he would explain the power of what’s going to happen and he was right, who would have thought? — but when you look at what’s going on with the four prisoners — now it used to be three, now it’s four — but when it was three and even now, I would have said it’s all in the messenger; fellas, and it is fellas because, you know, they don’t, they haven’t figured that the women are smarter right now than the men, so, you know, it’s gonna take them about another 150 years — but the Persians are great negotiators, the Iranians are great negotiators, so, and they, they just killed, they just killed us, this is horrible.”

in contrast, Kamala Harris, always spoke in the most vague platitudes and generalities. Her words belied a desire to never commit herself to any position or concrete plan of action. Partially because she was a politician, and partially because she is an idiot.

Ah yes, the man so smart that he threatened to sue any schools that might release his grades. https://www.phillymag.com/news…

Meanwhile the president of Mexico Claudia Sheinbaum has a Masters and PhD.

I can’t actually find where she said that

By rsilvergun • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
But right now linguistics have pegged Donald Trump’s speech at about the level of an 8-year-old. Not an eighth grader an eight year old.

I’m sure you can find her talking about diversity. The Democratic party is a extremely broad coalition where the Republican party is basically a combination of business interests and religious extremists. So the Republican party doesn’t need to worry about diversity nearly as much.

Diversity is only a bad thing because we’re all afraid of losing our jobs to somebody else. That’s not a sign that diversity is bad that’s a sign that giving all the money in the world to 1/10 of 1% of the population is bad.

The billionaires can no longer sustain our economy. They cannot generate enough jobs to maintain full employment. They’re simply isn’t enough work that is profitable and useful to a billionaire to keep us all employed. We are going to have to do something else.

Re:Study design?

By gweihir • Score: 5, Informative Thread

You can read the preprint (final draft) on Research Gate for free. It is probably 99% the same as the paywalled one referenced in the story:

https://www.researchgate.net/p…

Yes, it sometimes reads like satire, for example when it references the “Pseudo-profound bullshit receptivity” score. Even the abstract is already quite hilarious. Just take this quote: "…“corporate bullshit,” a semantically empty and often confusing style of communication in organizational contexts that leverages abstruse corporate buzzwords and jargon in a functionally misleading way.”

But this is solid, journal-level research and it explains all it does and what the strengths and limitations are. The research is actually based on 4 other studies and combines their results into the “Corporate Bullshit Receptivity Scale (CBSR)", to allow more uniform reasoning about the problem.