Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Apple Releases OpenELM: Small, Open Source AI Models Designed To Run On-device
  2. Framework Won’t Be Just a Laptop Company Anymore
  3. ‘The Man Who Killed Google Search’
  4. Windows 11 Now Comes With Its Own Adware
  5. Diamond Market Shows Serious Cracks From Man-Made Stones
  6. Biden Signs TikTok ‘Divest or Ban’ Bill Into Law
  7. Qualcomm Is Cheating On Their Snapdragon X Elite/Pro Benchmarks
  8. NVIDIA To Acquire Run:ai
  9. Veteran PC Game ‘Sopwith’ Celebrates 40th Anniversary
  10. Flame-Throwing Robot Dog Now Available Under $10,000
  11. US Breaks Ground On Its First-Ever High-Speed Rail
  12. US Bans Noncompete Agreements For Nearly All Jobs
  13. Generative AI Arrives In the Gene Editing World of CRISPR
  14. Try Something New To Stop the Days Whizzing Past, Researchers Suggest
  15. Oracle Is Moving Its World Headquarters To Nashville

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Apple Releases OpenELM: Small, Open Source AI Models Designed To Run On-device

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
Just as Google, Samsung and Microsoft continue to push their efforts with generative AI on PCs and mobile devices, Apple is moving to join the party with OpenELM, a new family of open source large language models (LLMs) that can run entirely on a single device rather than having to connect to cloud servers. From a report:
Released a few hours ago on AI code community Hugging Face, OpenELM consists of small models designed to perform efficiently at text generation tasks. There are eight OpenELM models in total — four pre-trained and four instruction-tuned — covering different parameter sizes between 270 million and 3 billion parameters (referring to the connections between artificial neurons in an LLM, and more parameters typically denote greater performance and more capabilities, though not always).

[…] Apple is offering the weights of its OpenELM models under what it deems a “sample code license,” along with different checkpoints from training, stats on how the models perform as well as instructions for pre-training, evaluation, instruction tuning and parameter-efficient fine tuning. The sample code license does not prohibit commercial usage or modification, only mandating that “if you redistribute the Apple Software in its entirety and without modifications, you must retain this notice and the following text and disclaimers in all such redistributions of the Apple Software.” The company further notes that the models “are made available without any safety guarantees. Consequently, there exists the possibility of these models producing outputs that are inaccurate, harmful, biased, or objectionable in response to user prompts.”

Framework Won’t Be Just a Laptop Company Anymore

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
Today, Framework is the modular repairable laptop company. Tomorrow, it wants to be a consumer electronics company, period. From a report:
That’s one of the biggest reasons it just raised another $18 million in funding — it wants to expand beyond the laptop into “additional product categories.” Framework CEO Nirav Patel tells me that has always been the plan. The company originally had other viable ideas beyond laptops, too. “We chose to take on the notebook space first,” he says, partly because Framework knew it could bootstrap its ambitions by catering to the PC builders and tinkerers and Linux enthusiasts left behind by big OEMs — and partly because it wanted to go big or go home.

If Framework could succeed in laptops, he thought, it would be able to build almost anything. After five years building laptops, what might Framework add to the portfolio? Patel won’t say — I only get the barest hints, no matter how many different ways I ask. He won’t even say if they’ll make less or more of a splash than laptops. Framework might choose an “equally difficult” category or might instead try something “a bit smaller and simpler to execute, streamlined now that we have all this infrastructure.”

If they don’t want THIS, what ELSE do they not..?

By Pseudonymous Powers • Score: 3 Thread

“If Framework could succeed in laptops, he thought, it would be able to[—]"

STOP. Stop, Dummy. To put it in terms I can only hope you understand: Make sure the IF part is true before you start doing what’s between the braces.

‘The Man Who Killed Google Search’

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
Edward Zitron, citing emails released as part of the Department of Justice’s antitrust case against Google, writes about Prabhakar Raghavan:
And Raghavan — a manager, hired by Sundar Pichai, a former McKinsey man and a manager by trade — is an example of everything wrong with the tech industry. Despite his history as a true computer scientist with actual academic credentials, Raghavan chose to bulldoze actual workers and replace them with toadies that would make Google more profitable and less useful to the world at large. Since Prabhakar took the reins in 2020, Google Search has dramatically declined, with the numerous “core” search updates allegedly made to improve the quality of results having an adverse effect, increasing the prevalence of spammy, search engine optimized content.

It’s because the people running the tech industry are no longer those that built it. Larry Page and Sergey Brin left Google in December 2019 (the same year as the Code Yellow fiasco), and while they remain as controlling shareholders, they clearly don’t give a shit about what “Google” means anymore. Prabhakar Raghavan is a manager, and his career, from what I can tell, is mostly made up of “did some stuff at IBM, failed to make Yahoo anything of note, and fucked up Google so badly that every news outlet has run a story about how bad it is.” This is the result of taking technology out of the hands of real builders and handing it to managers at a time when “management” is synonymous with “staying as far away from actual work as possible.” And when you’re a do-nothing looking to profit as much as possible, you only care about growth. You’re not a user, you’re a parasite, and it’s these parasites that have dominated and are draining the tech industry of its value.

Raghavan’s story is unique, insofar as the damage he’s managed to inflict (or, if we’re being exceptionally charitable, failed to avoid in the case of Yahoo) on two industry-defining companies, and the fact that he did it without being a CEO or founder. Perhaps more remarkable, he’s achieved this while maintaining a certain degree of anonymity. Everyone knows who Musk and Zuckerberg are, but Raghavan’s known only in his corner of the Internet. Or at least he was. Now Raghavan has told those working on search that their "new operating reality" is one with less resources and less time to deliver things. Rot Master Raghavan is here to squeeze as much as he can from the corpse of a product he beat to death with his bare hands. Raghavan is a hall-of-fame rot economist, and one of the many managerial types that have caused immeasurable damage to the Internet in the name of growth and “shareholder value.” And I believe these uber-managers - these ultra-pencil-pushers and growth-hounds - are the forces destroying tech’s ability to innovate.

Real problem

By phantomfive • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Despite his history as a true computer scientist with actual academic credentials, Raghavan chose to bulldoze actual workers and replace them with toadies

People who don’t play office politics lose to people who do. Having “toadies” helps you win the game of Survivor. It works because the CEO doesn’t recognize actual skill.

Spot On

By Murdoch5 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
The problem with tech is that the people leading it, don’t understand tech. If you ever see a manager open “Power BI”, you’re not dealing with a professional, you’re dealing with someone who wants to see pretty pictures and charts, without having insight, or, intelligence about the data or their field of work.

I’ve lost count of the number of times someone has been upset over a chart, in a report. I’ve lost count of the number of times I’ve been told the analytics don’t make sense, when the issue is the person doesn’t understand what they’re looking at. Hell, I’ve been in meetings where the solution to the report not looking perfect, was to start using Sprints. When I objected and pointed out that fixing the documentation, planning, and project management needed to be done first, I was scuffed and laughed at.

Management has turned from leading the troops into battle, to sitting at a desk, playing risk, with the monopoly rules, and crying about not getting nap time, then blaming the engineers because the product is yellow, not red. The funny thing about management, is that if you do it well, people don’t know you’re a manager. Good managers lead, and pull everyone up by setting an example. Typical managers, use buzz words, broken tools, bad reports and meeting to hide udder incompetence.

Let’s Be Clear

By The Cat • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Here’s what happened in tech. I can speak with authority because I was there.

During the 1990s, when corporate America was caught in last place technology-wise, they had no trouble hiring and fairly paying people to help them build what they needed. I was one of those people, and because of my hard work, knowledge and skill I multiplied my salary 500% in seven years.

This was all funded by hard investments in technology infrastructure, and it is when all the key platforms were invented or perfected: browser, TCP/IP, streaming video, high-speed graphics libraries, multiplayer gaming, ecommerce, Flash, LAMP, etc.

By early 2001 I was unemployable. I haven’t had a job since.

What happened? Simple. Plowing money into derivative shit became more profitable than tech stocks. (See Commodities Futures Modernization Act) All the capital and jobs were taken away so mortgage bonds could be monetized. That led directly to the housing crash, which led to bailout culture which led to mailbox money and then to rampaging inflation and finally to here.

They took our jobs, houses, women and money. Now they want our vote. We went from the greatest economic expansion in human history to the verge of ruin in one generation.

I couldn’t rent a job now. Among the reasons nobody would ever hire me (despite the fact my experience and skill catalog runs close to 20,000 words and the fact I’ve built four successful businesses single-handed without one dime of outside investment) are: too old, too opinionated, too experienced, too expensive and so on. The situation is the same for everyone in my generation. We took the leading edge of the post-employment economy right in the teeth. We were educated and trained (by lifetimes of hard work on our parents’ part) for an America that no longer exists. The world we grew up in doesn’t even remotely resemble the one we live in now.

We’re the ones who will never have homes, families or legacies because we were thrown off the train and we landed next to the very tracks we built.

All this bullshit about worker shortages and skill shortages is just that: bullshit. Stories like this are proof. Getting hired is pointless now anyway. You’ll just get fired no matter how good a job you do.

P.S. For those of you who think you beat the system, just keep this in mind: your kids will never own a home, have a family or have a real job. They’ll also never elect anyone to office. Have a nice day.

This same quote could apply to…

By dark.nebulae • Score: 3 Thread

This same quote could apply to Boeing more or less. The CEO and C-suite changed Boeing into a profit-maximizing, cost-minimizing fiasco, eliminating decades worth of trust and respect the Boeing brand name used to have.

Flamebait?

By kubajz • Score: 3 Thread
If only there were a way to mod the whole submission “flamebait”. Are there any “news” in the article apart from the posters’s impression that “Google search now sucks” and a decision to pin it on a single person…?

Windows 11 Now Comes With Its Own Adware

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader shares a report:
It used to be that you could pay for a retail version of Windows 11 and expect it to be ad-free, but those days are apparently finito. The latest update to Windows 11 (KB5036980) comes out this week and includes ads for apps in the “recommended” section of the Start Menu, one of the most oft-used parts of the OS. “The Recommended section of the Start menu will show some Microsoft Store apps,” according to the release notes. “These apps come from a small set of curated developers.” The app suggestions are enabled by default, but you can restore your previously pristine Windows experience if you’ve installed the update, fortunately. To do so, go into Settings and select Personalization > Start and switch the “Show recommendations for tips, app promotions and more” toggle to “off.”

Once again

By smooth wombat • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

This is why I don’t use Windows at home.

After W7 I went to Linux and haven’t looked back. It’s bad enough I have to put up with Microsoft’s excuses and incompetence at work, I definitely don’t want to deal with that at home.

The enshittification continues

By PseudoThink • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…

“Users’ colons must now stay internet-connected.”

By Pseudonymous Powers • Score: 3 Thread

I’m convinced that for the past couple decades Microsoft has been secretly run by someone who made a bad deal with a genie, ended up cursed, and is purposely trying to tank the company to get out of it. But nothing they’re trying is working as it should, and they sweat as they look at the marketing research.

“Come on! Come ON! They’re buying Vista? VISTA?! My God, what else can I even DO?”

Re:Too bad Wayland ruined Linux

By Brain-Fu • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

It’s good that the open source community offers so many options that everyone can find their favorite. But still, the level of zealotry in the community is so strong it is comical.

I am using Ubuntu. System D has never harmed me. The corporate backing of Ubuntu has never harmed me. It has “just worked” better than the other distros I have tried (Suse long ago, and Fedora slightly less long ago), does everything I want it to do, runs Steam and plays steam games just fine, etc.

Re:Too bad Wayland ruined Linux

By Samare • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Since its a leap forward and away from long used X11, it does have problems, but it’ll surely get better and hopefully better than X11 ever could.

Just like the switch to WebExtensions for Firefox: while it reduced the choice of extensions (and many can’t still be ported), gone are the days of extensions breaking with each Firefox version, installing or updating an extension requiring restarting Firefox or even one tab crashing or freezing both all Firefox tabs and its interface.

Diamond Market Shows Serious Cracks From Man-Made Stones

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader shares a report:
Diamonds may be forever but they are also seriously on sale. Natural rough diamond prices have collapsed 26 per cent in the past couple of years. Tepid US and Chinese demand for diamond jewellery hasn’t helped. But most ring fingers point at the increasing popularity of cheaper laboratory grown diamonds (LGD). This fracturing of the diamond market is set to last. After a brief pandemic-era boom in diamond jewellery, miners are battling to whittle down oversupply of gems. Anglo-American’s De Beers, along with Russia’s Alrosa, control two-thirds of the rough diamond supply. DeBeers this week said its rough sales dropped 23 per cent in the first quarter.

It is not enough. While rough stone inventory has stabilised of late, polished diamond stocks remain high. At more than $20bn at the end of 2023, these were near five-year highs, up a third since the end of 2022, according to Bank of America. Worse, as LGDs have taken market share, their prices have declined too, to about 15 per cent or less of their natural counterparts. Diamond miners spent years maintaining that romantic buyers would prefer the allure of rare, natural stones. It increasingly appears they were wrong.

Synthetic diamonds are nothing new, having appeared about 70 years ago mostly for industrial purposes. But in the past decade LGDs have taken off. In 2015, LGD supply barely featured as a rival to natural stones. By last year it was more than 10 per cent of the global diamond jewellery market, according to specialist Paul Zimnisky. This has created a competitive frenzy among producers. LGDs’ lower costs have enabled them to slash prices. In October, WD Lab Grown Diamonds, America’s second-largest maker of synthetics, filed for bankruptcy. It has since had to shift its business away from retail towards industrial customers.

Good

By Brett Buck • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I have no problem with people making money, I have done it every day for 50+ years. But the diamond business stands is a toxic combination of all the most extreme negative cartoonish stereotypes and abuses of a capitalist system. DeBeers, etc, deserve every bad thing they have coming to them. If synthetic diamonds put them out of business tomorrow, it will be a great step forward for western society.

Blood diamonds anyone?

By bryanandaimee • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
I think it’s worse than the summary indicates. Many customers would prefer lab grown diamonds to mined diamonds even if they were the same price to avoid the stench of violence and exploitation that hovers around the diamond trade.

Boo hoo

By Grokko • Score: 5, Funny Thread

I’m sure everyone is crying in their De Beers.

Re:Good

By jacks smirking reven • Score: 4 Thread

What the passport bros don’t tend to realize is that part of what marriage affords from a legal perspective is that same protection for the “traditional” woman.

If a woman puts aside career to take care of home and a family she has effectively sacrificed her financial independence, if the man decides to leave (no fault divorce cuts both ways) then she is in in fact entitled to a share of the money, she put in work and put aside money of her own.

Back in the mid century that the trad-cons pine for divorce rates were lower in large part because women could not afford to be divorced; you could easily be trapped in an abusive or unloving relationship simply because now you have these kids, no degree, no job experience. You are fucked if left on your own.

So if you are a man who want a long term relationship and a family learn to operate in the 21st century. Marriage is risk on both end, we men are not special.

Re:Good

By jacks smirking reven • Score: 4 Thread

In this economic landscape, it is almost selfish to want to be a stay-at-home-spouse

Maybe, it all depends on the two people. Most women today agree with you, that’s why we are seeing women’s success in college outpace men’s in the recent decades and the “wage gap” (which is both real and not real, it’s complicated) is closing YoY.

But women aren’t here pining for “transitional marriage roles”, they on the whole are doing great, making money, getting educated.

50% divorce rate

People use this but tend to forget that like 90% of human relationships don’t succeed, marriage or not.

But people who would like to see the marriage rates rise are going to have to do better than say “you need to learn better.” Such a tactic utterly fails to address the reasons motivating the current trends.

I never said I was in favor of higher marriage rates, only trying to explain the other end of the issue.

I think just the same and putting blame on “feminism” is pure cope. Times are different, human relationships evolve.

But I do agree if one wants to make higher marriage and families a legislative priority then easing the financial burden on families is critical. Meanwhile in the US we have

No mandated paternity leave
No mandated vacation time
Barely any public childcare services or any pricing regulations on things like daycare
Until recently there wasn’t even public Pre-K in most places
We had the CTC which did great but then rescinded it with no sign of reinstating it.

Biden Signs TikTok ‘Divest or Ban’ Bill Into Law

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
President Joe Biden signed a foreign aid package that includes a bill that would ban TikTok if China-based parent company ByteDance fails to divest the app within a year. The Verge:
The divest-or-ban bill is now law, starting the clock for ByteDance to make its move. The company has an initial nine months to sort out a deal, though the president could extend that another three months if he sees progress. While just recently the legislation seemed like it would stall out in the Senate after being passed as a standalone bill in the House, political maneuvering helped usher it through to Biden’s desk. The House packaged the TikTok bill — which upped the timeline for divestment from the six months allowed in the earlier version — with foreign aid to US allies, which effectively forced the Senate to consider the measures together. The longer divestment period also seemed to get some lawmakers who were on the fence on board.

Nation of Origin: Carolina

By Pseudonymous Powers • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
In general, I’m skeptical of legislative statutes that name individuals or companies. Even the fig leaf of generalizing it to “social media companies with foreign ownership grossing over umpteen jillion dollars per year” provides some value, in my view. Because otherwise your law books end up referencing a bunch of transient cultural phenomena like, say, the Charleston, and thus looking like they were written not by serious statespeople but by crazy demagogues bent on scoring points in a culture war to the expense of good policy. Ahem.

Re:Rebecca Watson on YouTube made a good point

By UMichEE • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

The precedent is already there. The legislation is just behind the times. There were laws relating to foreign ownership of radio stations, then tv stations, and now it’s social media. I’m surprised it took this long to happen given that the precedent is so clear.

While I find the security argument sufficient to justify a divestiture, the fair trade argument is even more compelling. The security argument is about what might happen, whereas the fair trade argument is based around already established fact. Communist China blocks access of American social media companies, even if they’ll localize data/servers. Why should the United States not do the same to social media companies from Communist China?

Stupid way to run a country

By bradley13 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

which effectively forced the Senate to consider the measures together

What a stupid way to legislate. Every bill ought to gave a single, specified purpose.

Re:Rebecca Watson on YouTube made a good point

By Graymalkin • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

TikTok itself is banned inside China. Many western social media and news organizations are also banned there. The precedence is already there.

The difference between trolls and bot farms and manipulation directly from the social media platform is gas lighting is significantly easier. The platform has all of a user’s graph data and can directly measure engagement with manipulative content. If they detect any engagement they can push less subtle manipulative content and accelerate as they measure increased engagement.

Trolls and bot farms don’t have the same level of feedback. They’re certainly not ineffective but their targeting is not nearly as precise. TikTok in particular is problematic in that Chinese intelligence services have direct access to and influence on the platform.

This is concerning not just with telemetry and graph data but also influence campaigns. Because the weighs in “the algorithm” of any social media feed are completely opaque to the end user there’s no way to know the difference between organic content, stuff the user engaged with knowingly, and content inserted to wag the dog. This is used by platforms for advertising but works the exact same way for manipulating for any reason.

Re: Still has to pass court

By flink • Score: 4, Informative Thread

That’s simply not true. It’s full of language like “no person shall be…” and “the government shall not…”. No mention of citizens. When the constitution is talking about citizens only it very specifically calls it out.

Qualcomm Is Cheating On Their Snapdragon X Elite/Pro Benchmarks

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader shares a report:
Qualcomm is cheating on the Snapdragon X Plus/Elite benchmarks given to OEMs and the press. SemiAccurate doesn’t use these words lightly but there is no denying what multiple sources are telling us. […] Then there were the actual ‘briefings’ for the X Pro SoC. To call them pathetic is giving them more than their due. The deck was 11 slides, three of which were empty/fluff, five ‘benchmark’ slides with woefully inadequate disclosure, and two infographic summary slides. The last was the slide below with the ‘deep technical’ stats [screenshots in the linked article], much of which we told you about last week. And more.

The rest of the ‘disclosure’ for Snapdragon X Pro was a list of features that all fall under the guise of exactly what you would expect. The rest was filled with deep ‘details’ like the GPU capabilities of 3.8TFLOPS. That’s it. No specs, no capabilities, no nothing. It was truly pathetic. But wait there is more, or less really, with statements like it having AV1 encode and decode. Trivialities like frame rates and resolutions were seemingly not needed for such technical briefs. See what we mean by pathetic? Those 10 cores are arranged how again? That 42MB of cache is what level? Shall I go on about the bare minimum basics or do you get the point now? SemiAccurate was planning to ask Qualcomm about their cheating on benchmarks at the promised briefing but, well, they lied to us and cut us out of the pathetic bits they did brief on. We honestly would have liked to know why they were cheating but we kind of think they will do their usual response to bad news and pretend it never happened like last time. If they actually do explain things we will of course update this article as we always do.

Prove it

By Pinky’s Brain • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

That’s some seriously stupid clickbait chasing just because he didn’t like the slides.

He might as well say this proves P=NP.

Cheating how?

By KingFatty • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
Um, if your title starts with Qualcomm is cheating, shouldn’t you somehow mention what the cheating is, or how the cheating is happening? The summary mentions criticisms of the slides, seemingly unrelated to any cheating, but we are told the slides are pathetic. How is being pathetic equal to cheating?

Hypocritical.

By msauve • Score: 3 Thread
Article complains in inflammatory terms about Broadcom’s slides lacking technical details and “without the minimum disclosure needed to check those claims.”, then goes on to make accusations while providing no technical details and without the minimum disclosure needed to check those claims. All based on unspecified sources.

Yellow journalism at its finest.

Re:Stay tuned, truth to come soon

By DamnOregonian • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
It *is* strange.
What does “settings” even imply in this context?
Why the weird part about them accidentally testing with x86 binaries? (assumed, since the “fix” was to use Arm native)
How on FSM’s green earth do these people consider themselves qualified to evaluate what is “possible” for some set of “settings” on a new piece of silicon?

This article was a pile of shit. Even if it ends up being completely accurate- the article is still a flaming pile of shit.

NVIDIA To Acquire Run:ai

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
Nvidia, in a blog post:
To help customers make more efficient use of their AI computing resources, NVIDIA today announced it has entered into a definitive agreement to acquire Run:ai, a Kubernetes-based workload management and orchestration software provider. Customer AI deployments are becoming increasingly complex, with workloads distributed across cloud, edge and on-premises data center infrastructure.

Managing and orchestrating generative AI, recommender systems, search engines and other workloads requires sophisticated scheduling to optimize performance at the system level and on the underlying infrastructure. Run:ai enables enterprise customers to manage and optimize their compute infrastructure, whether on premises, in the cloud or in hybrid environments.
The deal is valued at about $700 million.

Veteran PC Game ‘Sopwith’ Celebrates 40th Anniversary

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Longtime Slashdot reader sfraggle writes:
Biplane shoot-‘em up, Sopwith, is celebrating 40 years today since its first release back in 1984. The game is one of the oldest PC games still in active development today, originating as an MS-DOS game for the original IBM PC. The 40th anniversary site has a detailed history of how the game was written as a tech demo for the now-defunct Imaginet networking system. There is also a video interview with its original authors.
“The game involves piloting a Sopwith biplane, attempting to bomb enemy buildings while avoiding fire from enemy planes and various other obstacles,” reads the Wiki page. “Sopwith uses four-color CGA graphics and music and sound effects use the PC speaker. A sequel with the same name, but often referred to as Sopwith 2, was released in 1985.”

You can play Sopwith in your browser here.

For the original PC?

By drinkypoo • Score: 3 Thread

That’s a pretty decent amount of game to be able to run in 64kB.

I did have a memory expansion on the ISA bus of my IBM 5150. The additional 384kB brought it up to 448kB, which was enough to run most but not all DOS software that would run on an XT (which could be expanded to 640kB onboard.)

I probably should have piggybacked the system memory, I could have gotten it up to 512kB which really would have run almost everything. But instead I got a 286-6 with 1MB and ran Xenix on it.

Sopwith biplane, attempting to bomb enemy building

By rossdee • Score: 3 Thread

Those Sopwith planes were fighters, not bombers.

Re:Active?

By sfraggle • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Sure. The SDL port (I’m the maintainer) is still under development, and new features continue to be added. The original graphics and sound are deliberately preserved - the goal is to make it a great old game and not a lame new one. The project was admittedly dormant for a number of years and I’ve just recently come back to start working on it again.

The most significant development recently is the addition of support for custom levels. Until now there’s only ever been a single level that can be played over and over. Other features added in previous versions include medals, swappable palettes (to emulate old displays), the in-browser version and TCP/IP networking.

Working on Sopwith, AMA

By computer_tot • Score: 5, Informative Thread
I was lucky enough to play the DOS version of Sopwith back in the mid 1980s.

A handful of years ago I became one of two developers working to maintain the Linux/BSD port of Sopwith (usually under the name Sopwith SDL). It’s a neat little game and still fun, simple but challenging at the higher levels. Feel free to AMA.

Flame-Throwing Robot Dog Now Available Under $10,000

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Okian Warrior writes:
For $10,000, you can now get a flamethrower mounted on a robotic dog. Just load the webpage and scroll down. I saw this on the news today. *Definitely* we need to have a conversation about where AI is going.
The robot, called the Thermonator, is constructed by Ohio flame throwing manufacturer Throwflame and features one of the company’s ARC flamethrowers mounted on its back. The 26-pound robotic quadruped “can shoot fire in a 30-foot stream and comes with a built-in fuel tank powered by gasoline,” notes Gizmodo. “The company says the robot also has an hour-long battery, a laser sight, and lidar mapping, and it can be remotely controlled via the company’s app.”

The company says its product is designed for “wildfire control and prevention,” “agriculture management,” “ecological conservation,” “entertainment and SFX,” and “snow and ice removal.” It can be yours for the low price of $9,420 with free shipping.

Finally

By mccalli • Score: 5, Funny Thread
I think I speak for many when I say we’d been waiting for them to break the $10k mark. At this price, my fleet of armoured watch dogs becomes realistic and affordable at last.

Well this seems good.

By monkeyzoo • Score: 3 Thread

Everything is fine.
(Picture the dog in the burning room cartoon. Very apt considering this product. Lol)

And that night

By ukoda • Score: 3 Thread
And that night Aibo shed a tear for what had become of cute robot dogs.

don’t be a sucker

By DrunkenTerror • Score: 4, Informative Thread

it’s an off-the-shelf $1,600 Unitree robot dog with a $700 flame thrower attached to its back

Re:Why not just go the whole hog…

By sajavete • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
I may be wrong, but I think I heard somewhere that flamethrowers aren’t classified as weapons in the US. Might be why it’s legally easy to market Thermo.

US Breaks Ground On Its First-Ever High-Speed Rail

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Construction has begun on a $12 billion high-speed rail project to connect Las Vegas and Los Angeles by the end of the decade. The project, backed by $3 billion in federal support, aims to reduce travel time to under two hours and significantly cut greenhouse gas emissions. Popular Science reports:
Brightline expects its trains will depart every 40 minutes from a station outside of the Vegas strip and another one in the LA suburb of Rancho Cucamonga. When it’s completed, the train will travel at 186 miles per hour, making it the fastest train in the U.S. and comparable to Japan’s famous bullet trains. For context, Brightline’s most recently completed train connecting parts of Florida is estimated to top out around 130 miles per hour. Both of those still fall far short of the speed achieved by the world fastest commuter train in Shanghai, which can reportedly reach a speed of 286 miles per hour. Still, the new train could complete the 218 mile trip between Sin City and a suburb of the City of Angels in just 2 hours and 10 minutes. That same trip would take about four hours by car, and that’s without substantial traffic.

Once built, the trains will reportedly include onboard Wi-Fi, restrooms, and food and drinks available for purchase. Brightline hasn’t provided an exact price for how much an individual train ticket will cost but has instead said they expect it to be roughly equivalent to the price of an airline flight. Brightline reportedly believes the train could attract 11 million one-way passengers annually once it’s up and running. The U.S. Department of Transportation estimates the new train could cut back 400,000 tons of carbon dioxide per year and create 35,000 new jobs.
Department of Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg described the moment as a “major milestone in building the future of American rail.” The ceremony symbolically took place on Earth Day. “Partnering with state leaders and Brightline West, we’re writing a new chapter in our country’s transportation story that includes thousands of union jobs, new connections to better economic opportunity, less congestion on the roads, and less pollution in the air,” Buttigieg said in a statement.

Re:That’s not LA

By ShanghaiBill • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

It’s also disingenuous to say it will be done in a decade for $12B.

There is zero chance of that happening.

Is it legal for LV casinos to offer odds on when public projects will be done and what they will cost?

I’d take this bet at a hundred to one.

Not the first to break ground

By udittmer • Score: 5, Informative Thread

That was https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…

If it was completed in the proposed time, it would be the first to become operational.

Re:As a rail fan

By AmiMoJo • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Some countries just can’t do infrastructure. The US and UK are prime examples.

Then you have countries like Japan, which take a long time to do infrastructure, but they do it. Maglev starting around 2030, 90% tunnels through mountains. And then you have China, which went from zero to 2/3rds of the world’s high speed rail in about 15 years.

What we need to understand is why we can’t build stuff. In the UK it’s down to a combination of incompetence and lack of continuity. Every project is a one off and there is no steady supply of work for contractors, so even if it does get built any lessons learned tend to be forgotten.

Re:As a rail fan

By bradley13 • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

What we need to understand is why we can’t build stuff.

As a semi-serious answer, I think a lot of it is the current mindset both in Western politics and business. Everything has to provide short-term benefits, whether it’s the politicians thinking about the next election, or the shareholders looking to next quarter’s numbers. Infrastructure projects require a long-term view. Hence, they (a) don’t get the attention they need and (b) are tossed around on the stormy waves of ever-changing short-term objectives.

Re:That’s not LA

By Ed Tice • Score: 5, Informative Thread
Brightline is not a public project. It’s a private company with a track record of success. I’m actually posting this on a Brightline train that just left Orlando for Fort Lauderdale. And no I don’t work for Brightline nor have financial interest in the company. But I am riding their train for the first time and its more comfortable than flying or driving, my time is more productive, and it’s faster and cheaper on top. I don’t know how successful it is financially as I have heard that anticipated ridership has not been met. And I have an empty seat next to me. But the experience is wonderful so far.

We’re currently on brand new rail built by Brightline. It’s, according to the announcement just made, the first new rail in the US in over a hundred years. At some point we will turn onto existing track but right now we are going 110mph which isn’t high-speed compared to Taiwan or Japan (I’ve taken the high speed train both places) but it’s still a great piece of infrastructure. Whenever there is a Brightline discussion on slashdot, the comments are filled with negative things posted by people who have never taken Brightline.

US Bans Noncompete Agreements For Nearly All Jobs

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
The Federal Trade Commission narrowly voted Tuesday to ban nearly all noncompetes, employment agreements that typically prevent workers from joining competing businesses or launching ones of their own. From a report:
The FTC received more than 26,000 public comments in the months leading up to the vote. Chair Lina Khan referenced on Tuesday some of the stories she had heard from workers. “We heard from employees who, because of noncompetes, were stuck in abusive workplaces,” she said. “One person noted when an employer merged with an organization whose religious principles conflicted with their own, a noncompete kept the worker locked in place and unable to freely switch to a job that didn’t conflict with their religious practices.” These accounts, she said, “pointed to the basic reality of how robbing people of their economic liberty also robs them of all sorts of other freedoms.”

The FTC estimates about 30 million people, or one in five American workers, from minimum wage earners to CEOs, are bound by noncompetes. It says the policy change could lead to increased wages totaling nearly $300 billion per year by encouraging people to swap jobs freely. The ban, which will take effect later this year, carves out an exception for existing noncompetes that companies have given their senior executives, on the grounds that these agreements are more likely to have been negotiated. The FTC says employers should not enforce other existing noncompete agreements.

Re:20%?

By LostOne • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

You underestimate how common abusive clauses are in employment contracts. From blanket intellectual property assignments (even stuff done on personal time) to unpaid noncompete periods after termination, these are distressingly common.

This.

By rsilvergun • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Seriously fast food workers have non-compete clauses now and they have been used to bully workers into not changing jobs.

It doesn’t have to be legally enforceable it just has to be a threat to someone who’s in a weak position.

Re:20%?

By Tailhook • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Somehow that seems like a vast overestimation

Absolutely not. Every single employer I’ve had anything to do with since the early 2000’s has required some kind of non-compete, including very small shops. I suspect it’s the same for every “knowledge” worker.

I predict this will die a violent death in US courts. Every AG in every red state will be in one or more big zoom meetings by the end of the week preparing to kill this with fire. Don’t expect this to be real for years, if ever. They’re lining up the judges and injunctions right now. This is fucking with signed contracts and that isn’t something that happens in the US without a public law voted on by a legislature, war powers or similar caliber maneuver.

Many of the great names in computing, both hardware and software, were started by motivated refugees from larger outfits, striking out on their own to pursue some market their employer failed to see. If there is an underestimate in any of this it’s the positive impact it would have on opportunities for individuals. Just don’t bank on it happening: if you make any actual decisions that put you at odds with some document you signed, understand that 10 years from now some corporate lawyer won’t hesitate to wreck your world if this is all just an election year legal fiction.

Re:Finally!

By ShanghaiBill • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Indeed. Both employees and companies do better in jurisdictions that ban non-competes.

Employees do better for obvious reasons since they can hop to better jobs.

It is not as obvious for companies, but they benefit from more freedom to hire, ideas and innovation spreading faster, and more satisfied employees.

Non-competes are a prisoner’s dilemma. An individual company benefits from a non-compete but is harmed even more when other companies do the same. They are collectively better off if none of them do it. But the only way to enforce that, is a legal ban.

The FTC finally did something I agree with. That hasn’t happened in a long time.

Re:20%?

By gweihir • Score: 4, Informative Thread

At that time, the Republican party had not yet become completely corrupted, unlike today.

Generative AI Arrives In the Gene Editing World of CRISPR

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from the New York Times:
Generative A.I. technologies can write poetry and computer programs or create images of teddy bears and videos of cartoon characters that look like something from a Hollywood movie. Now, new A.I. technology is generating blueprints for microscopic biological mechanisms that can edit your DNA, pointing to a future when scientists can battle illness and diseases with even greater precision and speed than they can today. Described in a research paper published on Monday by a Berkeley, Calif., startup called Profluent, the technology is based on the same methods that drive ChatGPT, the online chatbot that launched the A.I. boom after its release in 2022. The company is expected to present the paper next month at the annual meeting of the American Society of Gene and Cell Therapy.
“Its OpenCRISPR-1 protein is built on a similar structure as the fabled CRISPR-Cas9 DNA snipper, but with hundreds of mutations that help reduce its off-target effects by 95%,” reports Fierce Biotech, citing the company’s preprint manuscript published on BioRxiv. “Profluent said it can be employed as a ‘drop-in replacement’ in any experiment calling for a Cas9-like molecule.”

While Profluent will keep its LLM generators private, the startup says it will open-source the products of this initiative. “Attempting to edit human DNA with an AI-designed biological system was a scientific moonshot,” Profluent co-founder and CEO Ali Madani, Ph.D., said in a statement. “Our success points to a future where AI precisely designs what is needed to create a range of bespoke cures for disease. To spur innovation and democratization in gene editing, with the goal of pulling this future forward, we are open-sourcing the products of this initiative.”

Which world? The cancer causing 1 or the cure 1?

By Seven Spirals • Score: 3 Thread
I’ve seen some good headlines (CRISPR helping cure Sickle Cell Anemia, I think) and some bad ones implying it’ll cause cancer some significant portion of the times it’s used. I’m still waiting for the “turn your eyes violet” kinda CRISPR mods we were “promised”.

Try Something New To Stop the Days Whizzing Past, Researchers Suggest

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Nicola Davis reports via The Guardian:
If every day appears to go in a blur, try seeking out new and interesting experiences, researchers have suggested, after finding memorable images appear to dilate time. Researchers have previously found louder experiences seem to last longer, while focusing on the clock also makes time dilate, or drag. Now researchers have discovered the more memorable an image, the more likely a person is to think they have been looking at it for longer than they actually have. Such images were also easier for participants to recall the next day. Prof Martin Wiener, co-author of the study who is based at George Mason University in the U.S., said the findings could help develop improve artificial intelligence that interacts with humans, while they also offer opportunities to tweak our perceptions, given research has previously shown non-invasive brain stimulation can be used to lengthen a perceived interval.

The results from two groups, totaling about 100 people, revealed participants were more likely to think they had been looking at small, highly cluttered scenes — such a crammed pantry — for a shorter duration than was the case, whereas the reverse occurred when people viewed large scenes with little clutter, such as the interior of an aircraft hangar. The team also carried out experiments involving 69 participants that found images known from previous work to be more memorable were more likely to be judged as having been shown for longer than was the case. Crucially, the effect seemed to go both ways.

“We also found that the longer the perceived subjective duration of an image, the more likely you were to remember it the next day,” said Wiener. When the team carried out an analysis using deep learning models of the visual system, they discovered more memorable images were processed faster. What’s more, the processing speed for an image was correlated with how long participants thought they had been looking at it. “Images may be more memorable because they are processed faster and more efficiently in the visual system, and that drives the perception of time,” said Wiener. The team suggest time dilation might serve a purpose, enabling us to gather information about the world around us.
The findings have been published in the journal Nature Human Behavior.

Old News

By NicknameUnavailable • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
The brain records history via epistemic moments (moments of realization) - if you’re constantly learning new things it will feel like you’ve lived a decade in a year whereas if you’re a couch potato a decade can feel like a year. Your brain is going to record every time you’ve ever wiped you’re ass unless you make it a unique and memorable experience each time.

Yes, of course

By quonset • Score: 5, Funny Thread

It’s so simple! Why didn’t I think of that while I’m in the office doing my job? Instead of diagnosing and resolving issues I’ll just hop down to facilities maintenance, grab a wrench, then make my way to the HVAC system. I’ll learn something new real quick.

If every day appears to go in a blur, …

By fahrbot-bot • Score: 5, Funny Thread

You’re either drinking too much or not enough.

And …

By fahrbot-bot • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Researchers have previously found louder experiences seem to last longer, …

This explains every Michael Bay movie ever.

Re:Yes, of course

By excelsior_gr • Score: 5, Funny Thread
Best case scenario: you learn a lot about HVAC systems.
Worst case scenario: you learn the exact reaction time of security personel.

Oracle Is Moving Its World Headquarters To Nashville

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot
Oracle Chairman Larry Ellison said Tuesday that the company is moving its world headquarters to Nashville, Tennessee, to be closer to a major health-care epicenter. CNBC reports:
In a wide-ranging conversation with Bill Frist, a former U.S. Senate Majority Leader, Ellison said Oracle is moving a “huge campus” to Nashville, “which will ultimately be our world headquarters.” He said Nashville is an established health center and a “fabulous place to live,” one that Oracle employees are excited about. “It’s the center of the industry we’re most concerned about, which is the health-care industry,” Ellison said. The announcement was seemingly spur-of-the-moment. “I shouldn’t have said that,” Ellison told Frist, a longtime health-care industry veteran who represented Tennessee in the Senate. The pair spoke during a fireside chat at the Oracle Health Summit in Nashville.

Nashville has been a major player in the health-care scene for decades, and the city is now home to a vibrant network of health systems, startups and investment firms. The city’s reputation as a health-care hub was catalyzed when HCA Healthcare, one of the first for-profit hospital companies in the U.S., was founded there in 1968. HCA helped attract troves of health-care professionals to Nashville, and other organizations quickly followed suit. Oracle has been developing its new $1.2 billion campus in the city for about three years, according to The Tennessean. “Our people love it here, and we think it’s the center of our future,” Ellison said.

Re:Healthcare

By DrMrLordX • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Oracle is not going to TN to help.

Re:Democrat here and yeah that was my first though

By acroyear • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

It is a bit of both. The tax dodge but yeah, nobody wanted to move to Austin because of the state government’s policies on, well, health care. Specifically women’s. The Navy I believe is seriously considering reducing Corpus Christie in the same way that the Air Force has more or less given up on Huntsville as a result of Alabama’s policies and representation. Recruitment is down and sailors, like soldiers, are sometimes resigning rather than moving to a ‘red’ state with poor education and poor, repressive health care options, if the alternative of resignation is available.

Now, TN is still majority Republican and *could* go that way, too…but it would be more obvious the healthcare hand feeding them than Texas where the leadership only thinks in barrels of oil.

I think the larger problem of ANY “HQ” move is, well, getting anybody to want to go back to work in an office in the first place.

Doesn’t that completely defeat the purpose?

By rsilvergun • Score: 5, Informative Thread
Tennessee is just as terrible about women’s reproductive health as anything else. It’s a problem for trans kids too and sure they only make up 1% of the population but when you’ve got several thousand employees you’re going to have a few in there. That’s just how math works.

I’m not exactly prime breeding age here but I wouldn’t want my kid trying to set up a family in a red state with the way things are right now. Too much risk of criminal prosecution even for a miscarriage

Re:Democrat here and yeah that was my first though

By Voyager529 • Score: 5, Funny Thread

when they fired them in Mass.

I didn’t even know they had operations in Massachusetts.

I’m pretty sure it was that Larry was so insensitive as to require all of the staff to attend a Catholic church service on a Sunday morning to get fired.

Re:Democrat here and yeah that was my first though

By bradley13 • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Your math needs some work. Monthly, Texas sees 5000-10000 illegal migrants crossing the border. We don’t know how many they don’t see and therefore cannot count. So let’s take the 10000 as a likely total figure. times 12 months/year, times your 20 years. You want to pay $50k/year, and on average (over 20 years) you would pay that for 10 years. That is a lot more than $6 billion.

Ok, I’m being facetious, because I know you didn’t really mean the number seriously. But: what is it about the word “illegal” that people like you don’t get? There are legal ways to immigrant into any country. People attempting illegal entry need to be immediately and forcefully deported. It would be far more effective to stop them at the border in the first place.

Texas isn’t “showboating” except in the sense that they are showing up the federal government’s failures. While, at the same time, trying to stem the flood of illegal immigration.