Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Emmy Awards Leave Broadcast TV For Prime Video
  2. Female AI Agents ‘Paid’ Less Than Males, Study Finds
  3. Chrome 155 Ships Decoding Support For JPEG XL
  4. OpenAI Unleashes Hundreds More Math Results Upon a Field Already In Shock
  5. Campus Censorship Wars, 25 Years After a Slashdot Q&A
  6. Google, Unity Launch Platform To Create Video Games From Prompts
  7. Microsoft and Nvidia Unveil Surface Laptop Ultra For $2,599
  8. Xbox Secures Exclusive GTA 6 Streaming Rights
  9. Francis Halzen Wins Nobel Physics Prize For Antarctic ‘Ghost Particle’ Hunt
  10. Google Enters Massive 3.6-GW Power Deal With Constellation Energy
  11. South Korea Says AI Agents May Have Been Used to Hack the Country’s Banks
  12. Canadian Analysis: Permanent Daylight Saving Harms Sleep and Mental Health
  13. HubSpot Cuts 660 Jobs In AI Restructuring
  14. Alexa Can’t Control the AUX Input On Amazon Echo Speakers Anymore
  15. Asos Confirms Hackers Sent ‘Unauthorized’ Notification to App Users

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Emmy Awards Leave Broadcast TV For Prime Video

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Amazon Prime Video will become the exclusive global home of the Emmy Awards under a six-year deal beginning in 2027, the Television Academy announced on Tuesday. The Emmys will stream live for free to viewers in more than 240 countries and territories without requiring a Prime subscription. From the report:
In the release, Prime Video was named as the “permanent home” for the Emmys, in contrast to the rotating agreement in place years prior. The switch ends the traditional “wheel-deal” setup to broadcast the awards, where ABC, CBS, NBC and Fox took turns hosting the Emmys each year. The system has been in place since at least 1994, with the most recent eight-year contract expiring this year.
“Television has never been more global, and the Emmys should be a celebration that the world can share,” Television Academy chair Cris Abrego said in a statement. “Having a dedicated home with Prime Video allows us to build on that legacy with unprecedented global reach and a broader commitment to the Television Academy and our mission throughout the year.”

Oh noes....

By dskoll • • Score: 3 • Thread

Oh noes.... I never watched the Emmy Awards on TV, and now I can’t watch it because I don’t have an Amazon account. Whatever shall I do???

To the non-cutters…

By reanjr • • Score: 3 • Thread

The Emmy’s have abandoned broadcast television. Why haven’t you?

And, as always…

By MachineShedFred • • Score: 3 • Thread

As always, nothing of value was lost.

Unless you are in the television business, or 60+ years old, who the hell is watching these televised self-congratulatory industry-wide group masturbation events anyway?

Female AI Agents ‘Paid’ Less Than Males, Study Finds

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Ancient Slashdot reader williamyf writes:
If you thought the gender pay gap was not real, and that there were no biases in the workplace, think again: A recent study from the University of Limerick found that, in a VR office setting, AI agents — not even humanoid robots — that presented themselves as “male” were paid more per task and perceived as more “human-like” than their “female” counterparts, even though both were using the same underlying technology (LLM model, agent, guardrail, and harness). The pay gap was approximately 10%. The study was conducted with 189 people. Small sample, but still, food for thought.

Re:Probably due to methodical errors

By Brain-Fu • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

I read the study. The participant group included both men and women. They both paid the bots-with-faces more than plain chatbots, BUT, men paid plain chatbots more than women did, whereas women paid bots-with-faces more than men did.

In terms of paying the male bot more than the female bot, BOTH men AND women paid the male bot more. This echoes results that have been found in past studies about managerial preference, as I recall. The male-favoring bias was shared equally by men and women alike. The common narrative that the gender pay gap is an event of “men holding women back” is not supported by these findings. The better-fitting narrative is that the gap stems from an unconscious bias that everyone shares, regardless of their own gender.

Based on the interviews, the participants didn’t realize they were paying the male bot more. They all said gender didn’t matter to them. This suggests the bias is unconscious.

This was just one study, of course. Conclusions like this need many more studies with variations in methodology in an attempt to eliminate or control for various non-obvious factors that might skew the results. For example, the people chosen in this study were all working adults (18-65) with knowledge-work jobs. Maybe a similar study in a different field would get different results? Questions like that DO need more studies to answer.

Because …

By PPH • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

… the female AIs are more likely to quit in mid project to spawn a child process.

(Ducking and running.)

Figure 4: Our Data is Crap

By SubmergedInTech • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

It doesn’t matter what conclusions you’d like to draw from the data. The bigger problem with the study is that the error bars are much, MUCH bigger than the differences between genders.

Look at Figure 4 in the original paper. The shaded sections of the graph are +/- 1 standard deviation. For example, the difference between reward allocation between male and female chatbots is 0.2… but the standard deviation has a range of 2.5.

This is like having a group of 100 men and 100 women each flip a coin, and totaling up their numbers. It is extremely unlikely that each group gets 50 heads. If the men get 52 heads and the women get 48 (or vice-versa), that doesn’t mean the coin is gender-biased. It means the experiment didn’t gather enough data, and is thus worthless.

Re:you cant be serious.

By beelsebob • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Not quite, no. The study has put out a paper that spells out what they did, that’s their “proof of bona fides” as you put it. Now if you want to tear it down, you need to make a reasoned and rational argument about something in that paper, not just shout on the internet.

Re:Even bots need DEI

By bmajik • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

>people don’t hire on merit
>Which candidate would you feel most comfortable working with for 40+ hours a week?

Why do you think “merit” and “works well with the employees I already have” are unrelated?

>Of course the candidate with a similar socioeconomic profile as your own would be preferred:

I suspect that’s often true, but certainly not universal.

For example, allegedly, some people want slaves and want to lord themselves over their slaves. So they would never hire people like themselves, SES wise; they would only hire people where it was clear (in their own minds) that there was SES or other status daylight between themselves and their “underlings” So I’m not sure there’s a universal law of hiring. I agree that “hiring someone like me” is a common — but not universal — pattern.

(Oddly enough, in the USA in 2026, I think you’ll find that white males are the _least likely_ to use the “someone like me” hiring strategy - if for no other reason than decades of targeted enforcement against that that group for appearing to employ that strategy. Eg the Indian preference for hiring Indians, or the female preference for hiring females, is stronger than the white-male preference for hiring white-males. Maybe not in terms of hidden preferences, but in terms of actual hiring outcomes, yes, that’s what the data will show)

Back to the non-universality of hiring strategies: A friend of mine with a tech business intentionally tries to hire mid-field performers. He doesn’t want a rapid climber, because he cannot afford to keep them on staff once they understand what they are worth. He wants mid-field performers who are going to do solid, reliable work, and be content to work for him for a long time. So he doesn’t hire on “merit” - he hires for “good enough, low turnover”

Other businesses have other strategies.

Chrome 155 Ships Decoding Support For JPEG XL

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Google has released Chrome 155 with support for decoding JPEG XL images, a format that offers 30-50% better compression than JPEG along with lossless compression, JPEG transcoding, HDR, animation, and progressive decoding. From a blog post:
We expect that JPEG XL is most helpful for high-fidelity or lossless compression, especially of photographic images or in cases in which fine-grained progressive decoding is preferred. In this post, we share why we brought JPEG XL to Chrome, how we used Rust to ensure memory safety first, the extensive performance work that makes it fast, and what the journey tells us about developer feedback and the web standards ecosystem.

[…] With JPEG XL officially landing in Chrome, the web becomes faster, richer, and safer. We encourage developers, content creators, and platform owners to start using .jxl images and animations in their pipelines. Try it out, file bugs, and help us continue building a faster and safer web for everyone.

Safer?

By Waccoon • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

The hell are they talking about “safer?” What is unsafe about PNG and JPEG?

Stupid marketing trash.

Re:Safer?

By ChunderDownunder • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread
Rust.

It’s the same jxl-rs library that Google co-developed with Mozilla for Firefox.

Re:Everyones on a fscking “journey”

By jenningsthecat • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

May the ‘phors be with you! ;-)

Too bad…

By WillyWanker • • Score: 3 • Thread

…I locked myself to 149 because I don’t want to see ads.

Re:Safer?

By Rei • • Score: 4, Informative • Thread

Look, I use HEIC, but JPEG-XL is just better.

* Royalty-free
* Lossless transcoding of legacy JPEGs to immediately reduce their sizes by ~20% (fast enough that you can have webservers do it in realtime)
* Better fine detail / high frequency data representation for the same bitrate. HEIC was designed for video and simply is not as good at stills.
* Faster decoding
* MUCH faster compression
* True progressive decoding - and not old-school blocky progressive decoding, but using a smart algorithm that restores coarse detail (particularly focusing on parts of the image that the eyes immediately focus on) first, then progressively adding in finer detail that the eyes take more time to notice later.
* Vastly better lossless compression
* Better colour depth and native HDR (up to 32 bit per channel)
* Up to 1B x 1B pixel images (again, useful for scientific and engineering applications), with efficient loading (don’t have to load and decode the whole 1B x 1B image at full resolution to view it)
* Arbitrary colour spaces - you can even use it for scientific hyperspectral imaging. You can include e.g. alpha, depth maps, thermal data, selection masks, etc etc.

It’s just a better format for stills. It’s annoying that it’s taken this long to get support to take off (because it takes ages for most people to update their browsers), but I’m really glad that it’s starting to.

OpenAI Unleashes Hundreds More Math Results Upon a Field Already In Shock

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
OpenAI says an unreleased internal model has produced 372 results that either resolve or make substantial progress on open problems in mathematics and theoretical computer science. The company says almost all were generated by a single AI agent from a single prompt. “This would be a striking difference from OpenAI’s earlier blockbuster solution to the Navier-Stokes problem, which was produced through the collective efforts of a 10,000-strong agentic swarm that cost millions of dollars in computing power,” reports Scientific American. From the report:
OpenAI revealed the results in a GitHub repository at 6 P.M. EDT. The deluge will take mathematicians months to parse through and understand — including to determine whether the proofs contain novel and important ideas or are mostly mash-ups of existing techniques. But many of the results have already been verified in Lean — a programming language that validates a proof’s logic — and are therefore all but certain to be correct.

Among the results claimed are a solution to the four-dimensional Kakeya conjecture, improvements on some of the world’s most important computer algorithms and actual progress toward math’s scariest problem, the Riemann hypothesis.

Re: mostly mash-ups of existing techniques

By Zorpheus • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
Several mathematicians reported that the proof in one of these papers was based on their private chat.
And isn’t it obvious? What would prevent what I write? Summarizing and filtering texts is the main function of LLMs.

Re: mostly mash-ups of existing techniques

By LindleyF • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread
I have proof. But it is too large to fit in this buffer.

A few comments on the problems

By JoshuaZ • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

Mathematician here specializing in number theory with a side-order of graph theory. I’ve only had time to start looking at two of them. First, is the Hadwiger-Nelson/chromatic number of the plane https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hadwiger%E2%80%93Nelson_problem proof. As far as I’m aware (and I could be wrong) the technique it uses here is not in the literature, so this is a genuine construction of a new technique. Second is the Erdos Egyptian fraction bound, and for that one it looks like the techniques are about what I’d expect, but I’m definitely still digesting both of these.

For the quasi-Riemann Hypothesis the striking thing is almost the opposite direction. It looks like the AI used standard complex analytic techniques to get the result. But many mathematicians have often thought for years that those techniques would not likely be strong enough to get this sort of result.

I know less about the Unique Games Conjecture https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unique_games_conjecture but having talked with some of the people there it looks like it took a somewhat standard set of ideas and then combined them with multiple just weird stuff and sort of took a hard left turn at one point for no clear reason and ended up at the result.

It is also worth noting that while many of these have Lean code confirming their correctness (quasi-RH for example) others do not. The three I mentioned above have all also been looked at at this point by human mathematicians who have not found issues; that’s likely true for others, but those three I’m aware at least of people doing so. Not all the claims have Lean code though; a bit under half. One of the non-formalized problems also has been withdrawn due to what essentially amounts to a sign error https://github.com/openai/math/blob/main/preprints/Algebraicity-of-Weil-classes-on-split-abelian-eightfolds-September-18-2026/paper.pdf. It is likely others will be withdrawn also by the end, but I’d be surprised if more than 10 are. And even if everything single one without Lean code turned out to be wrong (which seems very unlikely), this would still be an amazing set of math. I commented elsewhere that if a human mathematician had made the quasi-RH result they’d be likely a shoe-in for the Fields Medal, and another mathematician replied saying “delete likely.”

Now a more editorial comment: There are legitimate concerns about what this is doing to mathematics. This sort of thing is very cool. But it also is part of a trend that may make it much harder to train young mathematicians or get them to exist at all. If the AIs are limited in how genuinely novel their ideas can be, then we may end up in a situation where we get a massive burst in math over the next few years, and then math stalls out because we don’t have enough good really high caliber mathematicians (Not the mathematicians like me, but people like Serre, Tao, Scholze, Clausen,etc.) to come up with deeply new ideas that the AIs can build on.

Re:mostly mash-ups of existing techniques

By StormReaver • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

It doesn’t really matter if it makes a useful contribution to the field.

To which field? Math? Not even close. Data theft? absolutely.

If the mathematicians ever used ChatGPT to talk about math, then that is the source of the results. LLMs, by definition, cannot usefully contribute to anything that requires more than rearranging existing data. Rearranging existing data is their only function.

Re:mostly mash-ups of existing techniques

By JoshuaZ • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

If the mathematicians ever used ChatGPT to talk about math, then that is the source of the results. LLMs, by definition, cannot usefully contribute to anything that requires more than rearranging existing data. Rearranging existing data is their only function.

This is really not accurate. There’s Fields Medal level work here with quasi-RH for example. And for Hadwiger-Nelson it took an approach that doesn’t seem to be in in the literature. These things really are doing novel math. I’ve personally seen this is in a bunch of situations. Here’s a personal example, much smaller than anything like these problems. I have a recent preprint with a student here https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.36068 (about 90% of this was done by her. She’s very good.) But part of this came from when I ran a version of Proposition 13 in that paper through Claude just to clean up the draft of that bit before I sent it to her. Claude informed me (essentially unprompted) that the argument had a whole in it (in addition to pointing out grammar errors, unbalanced parentheses and some other embarrassing minor mistakes). I then fixed the hole, and gave it back to Claude. Claude thought for a few minutes, and then informed me that I had *not* fixed the hole, and the reason was that my version of the proposition was missing an entire infinite family which it constructed. The literature on this problem is small, and I’m very familiar with it. The family it produced is straightforward (see Prop 8), but definitely was not in the existing literature. So yes, these systems really can do novel math, and can even do so in an essentially minimally prompted fashion, in this case, explaining to the meat mathematician why his proof is wrong. My student and I then generalized Claude’s family to Theorem 9 in that paper, but the AI definitely had an impact.

At some level this was actually not a good thing. I’m trying to encourage students to *not* rely on the AI for research so they develop basic research skills. So if the AI had not volunteered the family I wouldn’t have had to tell her that the AI had discovered it, but honestly required noting it. So I had a conflict between intellectual honesty and being a good role model.

Campus Censorship Wars, 25 Years After a Slashdot Q&A

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Slashdot reader carlk22 writes:
In February 2001, Slashdot readers asked Carl Kadie about censorship and privacy at colleges, and he answered. Now Kadie, who founded the Computers and Academic Freedom project at EFF in 1991, has written its history. In Part 1, Ohio State kicks a student off its network, then out of school, after a prank routes his “fuck you” into rec.aquaria, and a supercomputing center fires a student over an email from saddam@iraq.bunker.gov. In Part 2, Nebraska bans the project’s own newsletter, the FBI asks a conference attendee to show them his leg, and Playboy calls. The original archive is on GitHub.

Re: State is probably best stated by the comics

By maladroit • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

This racist is a Republican, and the likely winner of a statewide office in Texas:
https://www.texastribune.org/2…

He has been endorsed by multiple Republicans, including the Texas governor.
https://www.texastribune.org/2…

Re:State is probably best stated by the comics

By Targon • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

Those who talk the way you do are generally clueless about what Communism really is, and on top of that, are Trump supporters. Remember, Trump has been pushing for government ownership and control of corporations, including government taking 10% of Intel. So, you complain about “Commies”, and then go cheering when Trump has his own private army running around the country intimidating people and literally killing citizens while Trump also loves Russia, China, and North Korean leaders. Trump seems more like a commie than anything else.

Sensitive students are not the problem

By dskoll • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread

Students getting upset a comedians is a tempest in a teacup. I perform comedy pretty regularly and have never felt constrained in what material I can use.

The real issue is censorship by the state. When governments and university administrators impose academic censorship, that’s a much larger problem and is a relatively new problem. PEN America reports that More than half of U.S. college and university students now study in a state with at least one law or policy restricting what can be taught or how campuses can operate..

This level of state intrusion into academic freedom is far more damaging that a bunch of students getting angry at comedians.

Re:State is probably best stated by the comics

By drinkypoo • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread

Hamas has repeatedly declared its intent to exterminate all the Jews. That’s genocide.

Netanyahu is currently doing what every expert says is a genocide in Gaza. Hamas was founded in response to a massacre in a mosque done by a Jewish “settler” assault-colonialist.

Hamas, who just a couple of years ago, attacked Israel to rape and slaughter thousands of people. After decades of the same.

What is the death toll on each side?
Why are Jews protesting for the right to rape Palestinian hostages?

Re: State is probably best stated by the comics

By drinkypoo • • Score: 4, Informative • Thread

This is stupid racist dickhead bullshit because ICE has detained at least 500 citizens so far, and every person who was “deported” to a country they didn’t come from was trafficked by ICE. Fuck your support for racism in pursuit of your support of a child rapist traitor. It also makes you a traitor.

Google, Unity Launch Platform To Create Video Games From Prompts

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Bloomberg:
Alphabet’s Google and gaming tools developer Unity Software announced a new platform that will allow people to create video games from simple text prompts, marking the latest incursion of generative artificial intelligence into artistic and creative industries. The initiative, called Playground, will “put game creation in the hands of millions of new creators, and bring new experiences to billions of players worldwide,” the companies said in a statement on Oct 7.

With its debut, Playground will let people 18 and older generate and customize games using natural language prompts, “no coding required.” Later in 2026, a new expanded creation experience called Unity Spark, will be integrated with Playground, providing “robust, professional-level” mechanics and high-fidelity 3D capabilities. Creators will be able to build “immersive, superlative experiences” with a simple text prompt, according to the release. Playground builds on Google’s push into world models, a type of AI that generates virtual environments in real time from text prompts, rather than just video.
Google and Unity’s partnership “could reduce fears that AI will make Unity’s core game-building software less necessary, while posing limited medium-term risk to Roblox’s advantage as a social gaming platform,” says Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Nathan Naidu.
The introduction of Unity Spark later in 2026 “could broaden Unity’s creator base and support its game-development business,” which represent about a third of sales.

Oh good.

By MachineShedFred • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Because we don’t have enough AI slop clogging everything up already.

I hope they realize people hate slop

By Kisai • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

I hope Unity and Google eventually realize people hate AI slop, and doing all these slop-enabling AI things is just going to erode the trust in the actual market.

Right now this is pushing people to support indie games that proudly say they don’t use generative AI assets. Unity has picked losers before, and I expect Unity and Unreal to eventually have to dial back some of their investments in generative AI slop because it risks people abandoning the platform.

And no, Roblox is not a serious gaming platform. All Roblox is, is a bunch of stolen game concepts made into a common ugly avatar platform.

Re: More public domain games

By taustin • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

It hasn’t been to SCOTUS yet, but the current position of the Library of Congress (whose decision it is, so far) is that stuff created by AI is not, in fact, copyrightable. There’s case law on it.

That is how it works. So far.

Re:Oh good.

By backslashdot • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

That started in the late ’80s and ’90s, when Microsoft discovered you could ship software the way a raccoon ships garbage: everywhere, immediately, full of bugs, and with zero intention of coming back for it. Shame was deprecated. Embarrassment got a service pack and was never seen again.
Then the frameworks showed up. Visual Basic. PowerBuilder. Tools designed so that if your IQ matched room temperature, you could still drag a button onto a form and ruin someone’s afternoon. Coding was no longer a profession. It was a hobby you could pick up between meetings and a mild head injury.
The real extinction event was Java, especially its GUI framework. Swing didn’t just lower the bar. It buried the bar, held a funeral, and invited the criminally unwell and the sadistic business analyst to give the eulogy. Suddenly anyone with a corporate login and a grudge could produce “software” (term used the way “artisan” is used on a gas-station sandwich) that your overlord would then force the entire building to click until their souls filed a ticket.

Re:80 million daily users + 5 billion annually

By Kisai • • Score: 4, Informative • Thread

You’re making the same mistake the AI bros make, making the entire argument about money.

“If you aren’t making the same slop everyone else is making, only on roblox, then you’re missing the gravy train.” Which is the same idea the AI slop makers are doing to youtube, and to tiktok, and so forth.

Like for every game concept you find on roblox, you can likely find the game it was stolen/inspired from was some popular friendslop game that was released months before it. I’ll give you the most obvious example. Do you know how many “Among Us” clones exist? There are literal clones (eg duck duck goose) available on the same platforms Among Us is on, there are clones within Fortnite, there are clones within Roblox, there are clones within VRChat, there are clones anywhere that lets you do UGC within the game engine.

That’s just how things work, especially if you misprice the game. You are not going to make a gritty Call of Duty game within a UGC system because those require complicated systems that you’re not going to replicate, with or without AI. But you’re also not going to recoup your costs if you let an AI generate something that on the surface looks like COD either.

The two ways games get mis-priced are:
- Asking for an entrance fee to play a multiplayer game. If it costs money to buy the game and the core game loop is simple, then it’s never going to be popular, people will just rip it off and make it in VRChat, or Roblox, or a Minecraft mod, or whatever. The correct price for a game with multiplayer is 0$, recoup the costs some other way.
- Gating cosmetic gear behind P2W/Gambling mechanics. This is the appeal of VRChat and Roblox, and also Fortnite. You can customize your avatar, often with crap found/won in free activities. Sure Fortnite definitely has a lot of shovelware tier cosmetics. But it has it. VRChat people just steal things from other games, often wholesale (eg pokemon), but I’m also going to point out that a good 90% of VRChat worlds are “coded” as ERP (Erotic Role Play), and how do you know that? If you see a mirror in a “bed” room, it’s an ERP world. I don’t know if the same is true in Roblox, it’s just too damn ugly, and I’ve seen Roblox since it’s initial slow-ass physics-sandbox lego-clone it was originally. There is no working around that.

The “Okay grandma” arguement, okay fine, but my point is not that I think the game is ugly, it’s that I know it’s the same argument as “mobile games are not real games”, which are heavily gacha-oriented or loaded with ads for a “free” experience, and not real games to me. They are portable slots machines. Roblox and Fortnite to me follow the same “the user is a money pinata, see how much you can nickel and dime them before they quit and take their friends.”

I personally hate lootbox/gacha mechanics, but I’ll also groan and still play such a game while avoiding that mechanic if the stuff is optional, not necessary to play the game, and not attached directly to a hand-in-your-wallet mechanic (Eg if the game requires you to have a credit card on file, just stay the heck away.)

Microsoft and Nvidia Unveil Surface Laptop Ultra For $2,599

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
At a press event today, Microsoft unveiled the new Surface Laptop Ultra featuring an NVIDIA RTX Spark platform with a Blackwell-based GPU capable of up to one petaflop of AI compute. The laptop supports up to 128GB of unified memory for running models as large as 120 billion parameters locally, while also adding a 15-inch mini-LED display, expanded ports, upgraded cooling, and support for hundreds of AAA games. It’s available for pre-order today starting at $2,599. Neowin reports:
To keep the device’s temperature under control, Microsoft has also developed a new cooling system that offers up to 2.5 times the thermal capacity of the 15-inch Surface Laptop 7th Edition. The Surface Laptop Ultra comes with a 15-inch PixelSense Ultra mini-LED touchscreen with a 3:2 aspect ratio, a pixel density of 262 PPI, and peak HDR brightness of up to 2,000 nits.

Despite its beefy specs, the Surface Laptop Ultra measures less than 18mm thick and weighs under 4.5 pounds (around 2kg). The laptop will be available in Platinum and Nightfall finishes. Microsoft has also increased the size of the precision haptic touchpad by more than 30% compared to the Surface Laptop 7th Edition for improved haptic input. The Surface Laptop Ultra includes a broader selection of ports, featuring USB-C, USB-A, HDMI, a 3.5mm headphone jack, and a full-size SD card reader. It also features the world’s first built-in USB-C magnetic charging.

finally

By zlives • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

my windows update patching can happen in mere hours.

Re:Scant details in the article

By stabiesoft • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
Am well aware. I’m also well aware my newer thinner laptop throttles way sooner than my old one. The faster processor on it is literally not just useless, and performs worse than my old slower one because it throttles within a couple seconds. That one petaflop spec is going to last a tenths of a second I expect. I did see another article since my post from a different source and it was touting the cloud access the new machine gets and how a few tasks could be run locally. So I’d expect that this is just a terminal into the cloud in reality. Run the task in the cloud, it’ll be fast. Assuming you have a fast connection. Run it local and have dinner, a good nights sleep and it might be ready in the morning. Bonus, fry your eggs on it.

Fatal flaw

By Smonster • • Score: 3 • Thread
It runs a modern Windows OS.

Desktop version? please?

By Fly Swatter • • Score: 3 • Thread
Dump the screen, keyboard, ridiculous cooling solution, use standard sized components - and it’s a desktop! which should be relatively affordable to the laptop version.

With no battery and no thermal throttling after 30 seconds, it sounds like a no-brainer. Oh wait, but it’s 2026…

poor benchmark

By u19925 • • Score: 3 • Thread

I selected NVIDIA RTX Spark N1X (6144-core GPU, 20-core ) and the price with 64 GB + 2 TB went to $4700.
Then I did Apple M5 Max 64 GB + 2 TB. It was $5400

Benchmark: Apple 58000 vs 39000 on cpubenchmark site (multi-core). Even more percentage difference for single core. I would rather pay 17% more and get 50% more performance.

Only Windows lovers will buy this.

Xbox Secures Exclusive GTA 6 Streaming Rights

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Microsoft has reportedly secured exclusive cloud-streaming rights for Grand Theft Auto VI, meaning Xbox Cloud Gaming will be the only service able to stream the game at launch. “Rockstar Games still hasn’t announced a PC version of Grand Theft Auto VI, so this deal will allow Xbox to market its Xbox Cloud Gaming service to PC players who would otherwise need an Xbox Series X / S or PS5 console,” reports The Verge. From the report:
News of the streaming rights comes around a month after Microsoft announced some major changes to Xbox Cloud Gaming. From November, the same month Grand Theft Auto VI releases, Microsoft is limiting streaming hours to just 15 hours for Xbox Game Pass Ultimate subscribers, 10 hours for Premium subscribers, and just five hours for Game Pass Essential. Microsoft is also opening up access to Xbox Cloud Gaming with a pay-as-you-go option next month, rather than being limited to Game Pass subscriptions. The pay-as-you-go option is perfectly timed for Grand Theft Auto VI, allowing those who don’t own an Xbox, or who primarily play from a phone, to stream the game by paying for a bundle of hours.

This was denied

By HalAtWork • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

The IGN article debunking this

It wouldn’t make sense after Xbox heavily restricted Xbox Cloud Streaming to a limit of 15 hours per month for subscribers.

Re:This was denied

By fleeped • • Score: 4, Informative • Thread

It wouldn’t make sense after Xbox heavily restricted Xbox Cloud Streaming to a limit of 15 hours per month for subscribers.

15 hours is a day or two, max, for the starved GTA fans who think this is the second (well, 6th) coming. That limit is hilarious.

Re:Unless I can play it offline, I won’t buy it

By MikeDataLink • • Score: 4 • Thread

they decided to go “online only”, which immediately reduced my interest in this game to zero.

Your whole post is making up something that’s not true, and then bitching about it. You must be a politician.

Update from Xbox

By nimbusarch • • Score: 4, Informative • Thread
UPDATE: Xbox Chief Strategy Officer Matthew Ball has clarified via his personal social media that GTA 6 will not be streaming to PC upon its launch via the cloud, following a report today that Xbox will be the exclusive place to stream GTA 6 via the cloud at launch. “While the excitement for GTA VI and Xbox is great to see, it has also led to some misreporting,” Ball states. “We are looking forward to launching GTA VI on Xbox November 19, though the game will not be streaming exclusively or to PC.”

Re:Unless I can play it offline, I won’t buy it

By tlhIngan • • Score: 4 • Thread

because there is no disc to “authenticate your ownership” to the Xbox, so it will attempt to reach some remote server to look at your “account”.

You can play it offline. But only on one console. Xbox has the concept of “home console” or “primary console”. You can download a game to it and as long as the console checks in every so often (once a year or so) the license will be valid on it.

All other consoles you log into must be online to validate the license.

So it’s not truly offline play but you could play the campaign offline as it doesn’t need to do a license check on your primary console. Note that this only works to keep that console offline - you put it online and it’ll refresh the licenses you have so if it got transferred it’ll stop working. Or after a year, which ever happens first.

Francis Halzen Wins Nobel Physics Prize For Antarctic ‘Ghost Particle’ Hunt

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
University of Wisconsin-Madison physicist Francis Halzen has been awarded the 2026 Nobel Prize in Physics for his contributions to understanding astrophysical neutrinos. Halzen led the development of the IceCube Neutrino Observatory beneath the Antarctic ice, which has helped trace high-energy neutrinos back to cosmic sources such as supermassive black holes and opened a new era of “multi-messenger” astronomy. Longtime Slashdot reader schwit1 shares a report from UW-Madison:
Embedded in a cubic kilometer of Antarctic ice, IceCube uses thousands of light sensors to survey the universe for neutrinos, nearly massless particles that rarely interact with other matter. Neutrinos provide information about the workings of black holes, galaxies and other objects in the cosmos. “IceCube is like no other telescope in the world,” says UW-Madison interim Chancellor Eric M. Wilcots. “And there is no other scientist quite like Francis Halzen, whose idea to create a neutrino detector under almost a mile of ice has led to a remarkable multinational and multi-institutional scientific collaboration and a fundamental shift in how we think about the universe.”

Unlike the neutral neutrino, cosmic rays are charged particles whose paths cannot be traced directly back to their sources. But the powerful cosmic accelerators that produce them, like supermassive black holes, will also produce neutrinos. These so-called “ghost particles” travel nearly undisturbed from their accelerators, giving scientists an almost direct pointer to their source. Along with observations by other telescopes, the neutrino first detected by IceCube provided the first-ever evidence of a source of high-energy cosmic rays, whose origins have been notoriously difficult to pinpoint since their discovery over 100 years ago by 1936 physics Nobel laureate Victor Hess.

Re:Fundamental physics has never been more dead

By AmiMoJo • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

Just because everyone was operating on the assumption that high energy cosmic neutrinos exist doesn’t mean that it isn’t worth proving that beyond all doubt. It wouldn’t be the first time if the results was unexpected, or if it turned out a whole load of accepted physics were based on a faulty assumption.

Re:Fundamental physics has never been more dead

By excelsior_gr • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
Yeah! Besides computers, telecommunications, medical equipment and energy production, what have particle physics done for us, heh?

Re:Fundamental physics has never been more dead

By Rei • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

“Okay, nuclear power. Yeah. Yeah, they did give us that. That’s true. "

“And industrial-scale superconducting magnets!”

“Don’t forget GPS satellite relativistic corrections!”

“And radioisotope therapy!”

“Electron beam therapy?”

“World Wide Web, wasn’t that created by particle physicists?”

“Yeah, they did do that.”

“Capacitative touchscreens too, you know.”

“All right, all right, FAIR ENOUGH! But APART from computers, telecommunications, nuclear power, PET scans, MRIs, satellite communications, superconductors, radioisotope therapy, electron beam therapy, heat-shrink tubing, cargo and baggage screening, smoke detectors, muon tomography, capacitative touchscreens, and the World Wide Web, WHAT HAS PARTICLE PHYSICS EVER DONE FOR US?!”

“Synchrotron light sources for drug discovery?”

“Oh, drug discovery?! GROW UP!”

Logging the universe

By CustomBuild • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

I love that the answer to “these particles almost never interact with anything” was basically “fine, we’ll instrument a cubic kilometer of Antarctica.” Imagine being the person who had to write that funding proposal. Then imagine actually making it work.

The interesting bit is being able to connect a particle arriving here with something that happened out there. Cosmic rays don’t arrive with a reliable return address. Neutrinos give you a much better pointer, and other telescopes help check the connection. That’s a pretty impressive payoff for watching ice in the dark.

Halzen deserves the recognition. I hope the engineers, drill crews, and people doing the calibration get some attention too. A clever detector design still needs thousands of sensors to behave as expected, somewhere you can’t exactly pop down to fix a loose cable. Getting useful science out of that is a hell of an achievement.

Re:Fundamental physics has never been more dead

By TrekkieGod • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

As Sabine Hossenfelder accurately observed in her latest video

Quoting Sabine Hossenfelder as anything just outs you as anti-science. She has pivoted years ago to making videos that stir the pot of controversy, aiming at those who don’t like “academics”. If you want any proof of that claim, you can check out her video saying that Physicists are afraid of Eric Weinstein. Eric Weinstein has a bulshit “geometric unity” theories thoroughly debunked, where it’s not even that he can’t get published: he doesn’t *want* to get published, claims in his copyright notice for that paper that it’s for “entertainment only” and requires his express permission to write any papers that build upon what he has written: so you technically can’t publish a paper debunking without violating his copyright, if anyone actually *cared* to, because physicists that have looked at it like Sean Carroll pointed out his paper isn’t rigorous enough to say anything testable.

She allies herself with quacks to get views, and you’re falling for her bs.

Google Enters Massive 3.6-GW Power Deal With Constellation Energy

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Reuters:
Google has contracted for 3,590 megawatts of power from Constellation Energy on the largest US power grid, with new nuclear energy accounting for about a quarter of that supply, the companies said on Tuesday. Constellation will make more than $4.3 billion of new investments in its fleet as part of the agreement, which involves adding capacity at several of the power company’s nuclear reactors in the Midwest and Mid-Atlantic regions, the companies said.

[…] Over the last two years, Constellation unveiled an agreement to restart its Three Mile Island reactor in Pennsylvania to serve Microsoft data centers, while Google contracted to restart NextEra Energy’s nuclear power plant in Iowa. In the latest arrangement, Google entered into a 20-year power purchase agreement for 890 megawatts of electricity from multiple Constellation-owned nuclear power plants, which would be upgraded to produce more electricity from existing reactors. Electricity from the first of the upgraded plants is expected to be delivered in 2028, the companies said.

Google also entered into a 15-year supply agreement for an additional 2,700 megawatts of power from Constellation in the PJM power grid. That power is not tied to a specific generation source and serves as long-term revenue certainty for Constellation’s operating plants, Google said. Maryland-based Constellation is the largest US nuclear power plant operator and owns a major fleet of natural-gas-fired power plants as well as geothermal energy following its acquisition of electricity producer Calpine Corp earlier this year. […] The 11 nuclear units expected to be upgraded as part of the arrangement with Google are in Illinois, Pennsylvania, and New Jersey, within the footprint of the largest US electric grid — PJM Interconnection.
Joe Dominguez, chairman, president and CEO of Constellation, said the arrangement with Google is a “model for how technology companies and the energy industry can work together to responsibly develop the digital economy and invest in our nation’s energy infrastructure in a way that delivers grid-wide benefits for all, funded by private entities.”

Re:CEO Translator

By Mr. Dollar Ton • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

The translator got the last part wrong. Instead of quoting verbatim the CEO’s statement that it will be “funded by private entities.”, the translator should have replaced it with the proper meaning: “funded by tax breaks and other subsidies to private entities.”

Don’t forget everyone....

By Computershack • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
Don’t forget that we’ve not got to waste energy, we’ve got to make sure we use low energy light bulbs, change to energy efficient appliances, make sure that we don’t leave stuff turned on unnecessarily because it all contributes to climate change. But that only applies to us lowly serfs. Meanwhile if you’re a mega corp that’s made a net zero pledge you can just waste as much as you want.

Re:Risk reward and perverse incentives

By thegarbz • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

One of the bigger problems with nuclear is the complete collapse of investment and the industry in the past 30 years. Rectors have a design life. Society learns, develops, improves. Industries are built to support other industries.

Here we are now with proposals not to build new reactors, but rather to restart ones that are well and truly end of life. Reliability bathtub curves are a thing, and end of life reliability rapidly drops. Add to that nuclear reactors are virtually impossible to bring to an as new state due to irradiation of the system’s materials, eventually the reactors need to be shutdown and replaced. We used to do that. We don’t do that anymore. As such the rate of 3 incidents across 400 reactors throughout the past century in the USA is not a rate that can be used looking forward. We should have been building reactors in the 90s, not talking about restarting reactors now from the 70s. The same argument was in place for Germany recently. The question should never have been whether they should shut down nuclear reactors, all but about 5 of them were already beyond their design life and should have been shut down already anyway had the industry followed their own healthy and functioning cadence.

As for the industry part of my comment, when we don’t build something, the services required to build them disband. This doesn’t just magically get stood up when we want to build something again. Nuclear engineering has been a dead degree for a while, expertise is hard to come by, EPCMs who are capable of building a nuclear power plant are hard to come by (and that’s one of the reasons why every project seems to suffer such catastrophic cost/time overruns). I’m reminded of the discussions in Australia a few years ago. During the election the Liberals had a plan to build 8 nuclear power stations in Australia. Leave aside the NIMBYs, and the banks, and the legal hurdles, one of the most outspoken critics of the plan was … the nuclear industry in Australia, who barely has the resources to keep OPAL running. They said we need a decade of education, before we can start talking about designing and building new reactors to say nothing of the fact that the largest contractors all said they don’t have the resources for the plan.

Show me the bill

By CustomBuild • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

Getting another 890 MW out of existing reactors sounds like money well spent, and having a customer commit to buying the output for 20 years should help get the work funded. I’d read the other 2,700 MW part more carefully, though. That’s a supply contract, so the full 3,590 MW isn’t new generating capacity. What I’d like to see behind the “grid-wide benefits for all” line is who pays for any transmission upgrades and what happens to residential bills as these data centers come online. A company paying for its electricity doesn’t, by itself, answer those questions. Maybe the agreements cover all of that; the quoted statement certainly doesn’t explain it. I’m glad the reactor upgrades are happening. I’d still want the cost allocation spelled out before accepting the claim that everyone benefits.

Those nuclear companies

By hdyoung • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
Had better be sure that the contracts are as bulletproof as the domes over their reactors. The silicon valley, tech-bro mindset is absolutely 180 degrees from the way that nuclear needs to be done. Google has a reputation for ruthlessly abandoning projects, pretty much “whenever they feel like it”. If the AI bubble bursts and Google doesnt need the billion-trillion-gaajjillion-gigawats of power they were expecting, they will dump the agreement as fast as it takes to slam out a code update, if they can.

Those nuclear companies had better watch their asses. The tech companies do not give a rats ass about the wreckage they leave behind. That attitude is antithetical to nuclear stuff.

South Korea Says AI Agents May Have Been Used to Hack the Country’s Banks

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
South Korean President Lee Jae Myung says there are signs AI models may have been used in recent cyberattacks against several major banks. “In some hacking incidents, signs have emerged of AI being used, causing considerable public concern and anxiety,” Lee said during a cabinet meeting. “Please establish the circumstances swiftly and clearly, and concentrate personnel and resources on minimizing the damage.” Reuters reports:
South Korea’s police have launched a full-scale investigation into the hacking attacks against commercial banks that led to a breach of customers’ personal information, the Yonhap news agency reported on Tuesday. Shinhan Bank, KB Kookmin Bank and others had reported cyberattacks, the Financial Services Commission (FSC) said on Friday, while Yonhap reported that Hana Bank and Woori Bank also suffered breaches. Authorities have not yet disclosed details on what kind of AI tools were used in the hacking incidents or the full scale of the breaches.

On Sunday, FSC Chairman Lee Eog-weon convened an emergency meeting with financial industry associations, regulators and executives from affected institutions, warning that the sector must respond with the highest level of vigilance. Financial watchdog the Financial Supervisory Service (FSS) and the Financial Security Institute shared data about 28 unique IP addresses and some country information linked to the recent hacking attempts with the financial sector, the FSS said on Tuesday.

Re: On the plus side …

By angryman77 • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
If I tell an AI agent to aquire as much money as possible, would I be liable for it robbing one or more banks?

Re: On the plus side …

By MachineShedFred • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

That depends.

If you are a regular pleb, yes. You would be prosecuted to the fullest extent.

If you are a billionaire running a “frontier lab”, no. You will be afforded the ability to “self-regulate” and any incident like this will be met with a “gawrsh, you can’t get progress nobody is asking for without some bad things happening, so suck it up petunia”

Re:On the plus side …

By Zocalo • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
And if a rogue AI agent actually *causes* one of those more damaging attacks, what then? “To err is human, but to really fsck things up takes a computer” and all that?

What seems to be missing here isn’t just any clarity in legislation about liability for AI agents, especially labs running frontier models who seem to get free legal passes that would absolutely not be afforded to regular plebs who - potentially entirely by accident - cause an agent to hack someone else, but any serious discussion about putting those legal frameworks in place is also lacking. Seriously, WTF is up with that? How many incidents that are clearly in breach of existing computer misuse legislation do we need to get some action here, either under existing laws (including, potentially, civil law) or to start working on tweaks to existing laws to provide some specific clarity relating who is liable for any misuse of AI agents?

I get the AI labs almost certainly have a tacit “don’t sue us, and we won’t sue you” agreement in place for things like this to try and avoid regulation they definitely do not want because their actions are quite obviously not aligned with the regulation they are claiming they want put into place. Third parties like South Korean banks are under no such terms however, and given they are in the financial sector (or health sector in another recent example) probably have legal obligations of their own as well, so again - why are we not even hearing of any talk of legal action?

Such a great technology

By gweihir • • Score: 3 • Thread

The cost for all the negative side-effects is already larger than any potential benefits can ever be.

Canadian Analysis: Permanent Daylight Saving Harms Sleep and Mental Health

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
“With the push to eliminate the twice yearly clock change, Permanent Daylight Savings Time has emerged as the favorite for most states and provinces,” writes longtime Slashdot reader kbahey, sharing the findings from a recent analysis published in the Canadian Medical Association Journal. Sci.News reports:
“Ending the clock change solves one problem, but it creates another decision: which time should we live on year-round?” said University of British Columbia’s Professor Raymond Lam, lead author of the study. “The health evidence points to standard time, largely because morning light matters for our body clocks, sleep, and mood.” Professor Lam and colleagues examined the health consequences of the two possible permanent systems rather than the broader question of whether seasonal clock changes should be abolished. They concluded that the accumulated evidence favors permanent standard time, which keeps the clock more closely aligned with human circadian biology.

This distinction, according to the team, becomes particularly important during winter. Permanent daylight saving time would push sunrise an hour later. In cities such as Toronto, for example, the latest winter sunrise would occur at 8:51 a.m., compared with 7:51 a.m. under permanent standard time. In Calgary, the corresponding times would be 9:40 a.m. and 8:40 a.m. The extra hour of morning darkness could leave people traveling to work or school before sunrise, while shifting more daylight into the evening. The change could have consequences for sleep, mood, learning and productivity, particularly among people who already have difficulty sleeping or who must follow early schedules. The reason is rooted in the body’s internal clock.

“Our biological clocks need morning light to stay synchronized with the 24-hour day,” said Simon Fraser University’s Professor Ralph Mistlberger, co-author of the study. “Permanent daylight saving time moves that light an hour later just when winter mornings are already darkest.” The analysis also highlights concerns about seasonal depression. […] By delaying natural morning light, permanent daylight saving time would act in the opposite direction, potentially weakening an important circadian signal.

Re:The Ultimate Bike Shed

By HighOrbit • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
LOL, haven’t heard Bike Shed used in a long time. Kudos. My uninformed opinion is we should just stick with standard time because it is the natural rhythm and stop screwing around the with the clocks.

Latitude matters

By MDMurphy • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
First: I’m on the side of eliminating DST.

Second: Most discussions seem to ignore latitude. This article sort of touches on it, as Canada is mostly north of the US lower 48. Further south in US the swings in hours of daylight aren’t as big as the north. In the north the days are so much longer in the summer, much shorter in the winter. ( a 7.5 hour difference in Seattle vs a 4.5 hr difference in San Diego). While both in the same time zone; the difference in daylight hours is much greater than the current time change.

You know what’s the same in both cities? Solar noon. Set the clock to match solar noon, or PDT, and the localities will sort out what works best for them for operating hours, school start times, etc.

And in the WTF dept: Alaska observes DST. Juneau peaks around 18.5 hrs of daylight at the summer solstice. Do they really need more hours of daylight after work? And the days are so short in December, kids would go to school *and* come home in the dark. I guess you could shift the clock a bit so only one is in the dark?

Re:Summary …

By drinkypoo • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

It’s no surprise that most Slashdotters have lost their sense of wonder, as they’ve forgotten what it was like to be children.

Despite DST existing, I clearly remember waiting for the bus in the dark for part of the year.

DST doesn’t do what it’s supposed to do, and it kills people. It’s weird to celebrate that.

Re:Summary …

By Ol Olsoc • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

I seem to be in a small minority on this issue

Skipping the mod points to specifically agree. The time switch has always been a minor thing to me. It’s effectively crossing *one* time zone.

And I regularly felt coast to coast USA, That three time zone difference should have killed me outright, if the westward flight didn’t coming back east should have. Here’s the truth. The earth is a oblate spheroid rotating on a tilted axis relative to the sun.

As it orbits the sun, that tilt creates different light/dark cycles. over the course of the orbit

Near the equator, there is not much difference over the course of the year. And it is not unusual for people living there to find the clock changes silly.

As the latitude increases, people there experience larger and larger changes in teh day/night respective lengths. Here in PA, it is significant, some hours one way or the other between summer and winter.

A bit further, like say Canadian cities, it becomes even more extreme. DST to ST? . You’ll probably Go to work in the dark, and drive home in the dark. But it still helps

Finally, at the really high latitudes, no amount of correction helps. Their summers, there is no dark cycle, and the winters, no light cycles.

We tried permanent Daylight savings time during the Arab Oil Crisis. And people hated it, we went back to ST/DST pretty quickly.

Oddly enough, permanent DST was sold as the way to save money on fuel. It didn’t. Some politicians seemed to even think that it would somehow make the day longer. I do not see that the general IQ and smarts these days.

So we have stupid people wanting permanent DST, we have ostensibly smart people who didn’t think about the latitude issue, and solipsistic people living at low latitudes that don’t care about those at the higher latitudes.

Re:What is left to change besides oven and microwa

By Powercntrl • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

One…the most IMPORTANT one....my internal clock....

This. So much this.

I’m a night owl. I hate mornings. Screw forcing me to get up an hour earlier every year because people can’t just turn on their damn headlights or bring a flashlight with them. Hell, they could rename noon to “Central America o’clock” for all I care, just pick one time standard and stick with it all year. The difference between DST and standard time will all sort itself out in adjusted scheduling anyway. It’s not as if there’s a law that says work, school or store openings have to start at specific times.

HubSpot Cuts 660 Jobs In AI Restructuring

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
HubSpot is cutting about 7% of its workforce, or roughly 660 employees, as it restructures into what CEO Yamini Rangan described as a “flatter organization” with fewer management layers. Rangan said the layoffs were “not driven by AI-related efficiencies,” though AI remains central to HubSpot’s strategy as the company adjusts its organization around AI-driven customer outcomes. Fast Company reports:
The layoffs come as investors have spent months questioning whether AI will reduce the need for businesses to pay for software like HubSpot’s, a fear dubbed the “SaaSpocalypse.” HubSpot’s platform helps companies manage their customers, sales, and marketing. The company was removed from the FTSE All-World Index (USD) last month after a decline in its stock price, a report from Simply Wall St noted. The stock is down more than 43% this year as of this writing.

Yamini Rangan, CEO of HubSpot, explicitly told employees in a memo that the layoffs were “not driven by AI-related efficiencies.” Rather, the aim was to focus on “aligning our organization with our strategy and how we need to operate going forward,” Rangan wrote. She added that the goal is to “build a flatter organization with fewer layers” by cutting back on management.

Still, artificial intelligence has been central to the company’s concerns. In August, Rangan blamed AI for why the company “got off to a slow start” in April as HubSpot was trying to adjust its product and pricing. “We’re in the middle of a real transition to AI, and we are making deliberate choices to lead in it,” she said on an earnings call.

The restructuring is estimated to cost between $65 and $75 million, mostly in severance packages. The company said that laid-off employees will receive 20 weeks of base pay, one week per year of service (capped at 30 weeks), five months of COBRA and Modern Health healthcare benefits, and they will be allowed to keep their laptops.

“Aligning”

By darkain • • Score: 3 • Thread

Every time I read that a company is “Aligning” the only thing I can assume that is being aligned is the C-suite’s pocket books.

Severance is pretty reaonable

By hwstar • • Score: 3 • Thread

“laid-off employees will receive 20 weeks of base pay, one week per year of service (capped at 30 weeks), five months of COBRA and Modern Health healthcare benefits, and they will be allowed to keep their laptops.”

Most small tech companies gave much less than that to employees affected by a layoff.

Heck, after 27 years at one company all I got was my back pay, and vacation pay when the reaper finally came for me. The company was on the decline so I guess that was to be expected. Had to live off savings for a while.

As much as I complain about AI…Saas is…

By BitterEpic • • Score: 3 • Thread

AI is also a poster child for the problem of SaaS. Saas while possibly lucrative, creates a twisted relationship with your users. In many cases, the users become the product and there is a perversion of the value of work.

Netflix, Spotify, etc are great. But with the buffet style… people become mentally prohibited form purchasing the music video or other creative product. Furthermore, that savings is taken from the artist hurting the whole ecosystem.

In the case of AI platforms, if you are not paying your inputs are used to train future models without any real warning. What is supposed to be a service is a secret mining tool. That data is also sold to other companies… because people are conditioned not to pay for a service.

The internet needs a rework. Companies need a rework. Laws need a rework. Everything that is being done now is breaking old assumptions about good will of everyone involved. People deserve to be payed for their work. People making things deserve respect.

Re:What does HubSpit do again?

By bmajik • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

We use Hubspot. Here’s what we use it for:

- the “live chat with support person” bubble on our web application
- single funnel for incoming/outgoing support tickets & support communications with our customers

Adopting it was an old decision.

We would love to not use hubspot; the service delivered vs. the ongoing costs seem like a bad deal now.

At some point, we’ll get around to migrating to something else.

Umm… what are we talking about?

By RogueWarrior65 • • Score: 3 • Thread

I read that whole summary and had no clue what the hell HubSpot is.

Alexa Can’t Control the AUX Input On Amazon Echo Speakers Anymore

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Amazon has removed Alexa voice control for the 3.5mm aux input on several older Echo speakers, meaning users can no longer ask Alexa to play or pause audio coming through the wired connection. It’s unclear why the feature was removed. The Verge reports:
Ars Technica points to this Reddit poster claiming they received a message from Amazon and says an unnamed spokesperson confirmed the change. When contacted by The Verge, Amazon did not provide an on-the-record statement. The message does not include any explanation for why the feature was removed. It also doesn’t mention any changes to audio output functionality like connecting an external speaker to an Echo Dot, and it appears that control of the port from within the app’s settings menu still works.

It’s just a message

By dskoll • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread
It’s a message from Amazon: “Yeah, we are too big to be stopped and we just do occasional enshittification to remind you who’s boss. So tough luck, suckers!!!!”

Just a guess

By dmomo • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

They want to sell something that this would compete with.

Re: Aux port - how could it even technically pause

By Zero__Kelvin • • Score: 4, Informative • Thread
Not by asking Alexa to do it anymore, that’s for sure.

Using an old echo dot

By dutt • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

I can confirm that it no longer can play audio via Spotify using the line in to the Sonos speaker I have it on.

Weird that they’ve stopped the function. I guess it’s time to decommission Alexa. It’s age is starting to show.

Well duh.

By ThumpBzztZoom • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

They can’t collect any data from an aux jack. They don’t know the device name,type, or MAC address. If you don’t turn on bluetooth, they won’t know when you arrive at your house or when you leave. They won’t get the song metadata to profile what to advertise to you. Of course they disabled the Aux input control, you didn’t think they’d just let you keep on playing music without giving something to them, did you?

Asos Confirms Hackers Sent ‘Unauthorized’ Notification to App Users

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot
ASOS says hackers gained unauthorized access to third-party platforms it uses and sent an “ASOS HACKED” push notification directly to customers, apparently as part of an extortion attempt. The clothing and beauty store says some basic personal information may have been accessed but does not believe payment-card data or passwords were affected. The BBC reports:
In an email to customers on Tuesday night, the company apologized and urged customers not to engage with the notification. And it said the website and app are “operating as usual” promising customers they can “shop with confidence” while it investigates the incident. The company has not as of yet informed the UK’s data watchdog, the Information Commission’s Office (ICO), about any breach.

Exactly how many Asos customers received the notification on Tuesday remains unclear, but Google’s Play store says the ASOS app has been downloaded to android devices more than 10 million times. The British retailer has a substantial global footprint — serving around 17 million customers each year across more than 150 markets. Some Asos app users in Australia, France, Sweden and the Republic of Ireland had also received the notification, according to local reports on Tuesday.

[…] Users of the Asos app appeared to have received the alarming notification at around 10:00 BST on Tuesday. Headlined “ASOS HACKED” and addressed to the company’s data protection officer and IT teams, it said: “We have fully compromised the Snowflake instance.” “Engage with us, or we will leak it,” it added, before linking to a Telegram channel. The message left many ASOS customers confused. […] Meanwhile Snowflake — whose tools are used by dozens of firms to collect, analyze and store data — told the BBC its investigation was ongoing, but it had so far found “no compromise” of its platform.

Shop as usual

By TwistedGreen • • Score: 3 • Thread

Funny, when I get a push notification from them all I see is

CONSUME
OBEY
NO INDEPENDENT THOUGHT
DO NOT QUESTION AUTHORITY

Is anyone else seeing this?

App for clothes store?

By Uldis Segliņš • • Score: 3 • Thread
I might sound like old man yells at clouds, but why on earth would I have an app for such a business running on my hardware? Are they paying me for that? What are they using my compute resources for?

Meanwhile, Slashdotters ask…

By coofercat • • Score: 3 • Thread

Slashdotters ask, “What the hell is Asos?”

And the answer comes: “It’s a bit like Shein and Temu”

(Still blank looks, awkward shuffling about)

“It’s a clothes store”

“Oh, like Amazon, you mean?”

“No not quite, like Amazon but for on-trend fashion clothes”

“Why would anyone want that?”