Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Airbus Is Ordered To Inspect 16 Jets After Cracks Are Found In Wings
  2. Notion Mail Is Shutting Down
  3. ‘Fingerprints’ of Black Hole’s Event Horizon Detected For First Time
  4. Spain To Require Carriers To Keep Mobile Networks Live During Power Outages
  5. Polestar Banned From Selling Cars In US From Model Year 2027
  6. Trump Administration Asks OpenAI To Stagger Release of New Model
  7. Linux Foundation Launches Akrites To Coordinate AI-Driven Open Source Security
  8. Apple Raises Prices On Macs, iPads, and More By Hundreds of Dollars
  9. LastPass Says Hackers Stole Customer Support Case Data During Klue Breach
  10. Anthropic Says Alibaba Must Be Punished For Largest Claude Cloning Attack
  11. Ford Rehires 350 Engineers After AI Fails To Preserve Expertise or Train Juniors
  12. Micron Locks In Historically High Memory Prices For Five Years
  13. Google Starts Lowering Play Store Fees, Making Good On Epic Games Settlement
  14. New Study Shows That Tall Vehicle Hoods Cause Hundreds More Deaths Per Year
  15. NASA Rover Detects Potential Signatures of Ancient Microbial Life On Mars

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Airbus Is Ordered To Inspect 16 Jets After Cracks Are Found In Wings

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
schwit1 shares a report from The Wall Street Journal:
The European Union Aviation Safety Agency has ordered (PDF) urgent inspections of 16 Airbus A380 planes operated by Emirates and Qantas, after cracks were found in a wing component on some aircraft (source paywalled; alternative source).. Cracks were found during earlier inspections of the wing spars structure, a key component of the wing, EASA said in a directive effective Wednesday. EASA determined that they “could reduce the structural integrity of the wing.”

“To address this potential unsafe condition, Airbus determined that an additional special detailed inspection has to be accomplished,” EASA said. The first group of five aircraft, operated by Emirates, need to be inspected immediately, while the second group of 11 aircraft can be inspected later but within 25 flight cycles, EASA said in a separate statement. From the second group, 10 are operated by Emirates and one by Qantas, the aviation safety agency said.

Re:Would a Spar be Repairable?

By PPH • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Possibly repairable with the application of doubler plates, depending on the extent of cracking. Replacing a wing spar may be uneconomical and result in the aircraft being written off. Such major structural repairs may be possible in other parts of an aircraft. But not so much the wings. The entire weight hangs from those.

Re:Would a Spar be Repairable?

By jd • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

As production has ended, if the A380 is genuinely necessary, then the economics shift somewhat. That doesn’t mean they CAN be replaced, from the sounds of it they can’t* (at least in many cases), but the inability to replace the aircraft would mean that options that aren’t rational become necessary.

*I have to be careful here. If the wing is designed to be the absolute minimum weight possible, then I don’t see how they could be without fully disassembling the entire wing and then reconstructing it from the ground up. And adhesives/welding might mean that just can’t be done. At all. On the other hand, there’s no obvious reason why you couldn’t design a wing to have far more structural support than actually needed AND make spars deliberately maintainable and replaceable. I don’t have an A380 handbook in front of me, so can’t say how Airbus approached this. But it seems improbable that they’re built to be swapped.

Notion Mail Is Shutting Down

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Notion announced that it will shut down its email client on September 22. The company says more than half of users already manage email through Notion’s AI agents without opening their inbox, so it is shifting its focus from a traditional email client to agent-run workflows. Engadget reports:
It has published an FAQ for users to make sure that they don’t lose any messages or data in the transition. Most emails will still exist in a Gmail inbox, but customers will need to manually export their drafts, scheduled emails, snippets and auto label instructions.
Notion first began offering Notion Mail after acquiring startup Skiff in 2024.

Can’t Wrap My Head Around Notion

By SlashbotAgent • Score: 3 Thread

What is Notion? From their website they are all things to all people AND AI!!!!! But, I can’t wrap my head around what it actually is, with or without email.

Can anyone explain what it is and/or who its competitors are?

Re:Can’t Wrap My Head Around Notion

By SumDog • Score: 5, Informative Thread
It’s a wiki. It’s an ultra shitty clone of Confluence. We used it at my last company and it sucked ass. Some people use it for general note taking.

Who, and who?

By drinkypoo • Score: 5, Funny Thread

News for nobody. Stuff that doesn’t matter.

Nothing + Claude

By geek • Score: 3 Thread

Notion is really only valuable as a memory/brain for Claude these days. It actually excels at that when used properly. I was also annoyed by their gmail/calendar inetgration though. It really wanted to take over the inbox and tag things how it wanted. I just didn’t understand the point of it.

Re: Never heard of either Notion/Skiff

By Kiffer • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

This is a death spiral for a lot of software and services. “Only 45% of our users use this feature, so we can cut it. Only 15 percent use this feature so we can cut it.” Repeat a couple of times.
But, those features that might have seemed like niche features were the feature that those customers valued. So now, 45% of your users just stop being users. Yes-yes they probably used the other features too, but, they needed the feature that you cut, so they have to go else where to find it.
I’ve seen it over and over. Version 1 of software has 100 features. Version two, developed using Agile Methodologies, some witt sets the priorities for features such that any feature used by fewer than 25% of users is so low a priority that it never gets implemented. That’s enough features that every user uses at least a couple of them, in a non-overlapping mess of usage patterns.
Everyone is unhappy, management decides it’s because they didn’t have needed features and instead had a something that no one actually wanted, but became someone’s personal hill to die on in a planning meeting, and no one can tell him no. So they implement the feature, and 75% of users turn it off… so next update that “feature” can’t be turned off because someone went to bat so hard for it that they can’t cope with the idea that they should have just implemented the missing old features.
Got a bit ranty, don’t use Notion, but it sounds like whoever is in charge has notions.

‘Fingerprints’ of Black Hole’s Event Horizon Detected For First Time

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Researchers say they detected the first gravitational-wave “fingerprints” of a black hole’s event horizon by analyzing the final moments of the powerful GW250114 merger. The findings support Einstein’s general relativity and may eventually help probe frame dragging and quantum fluctuations near black holes. Phys.org reports:
For the new research published in Nature, an international team of researchers analyzed data from the strongest gravitational wave ever recorded, known as GW250114, detected by the LIGO observatory in January 2025. By isolating the last burst of waves — known as “direct waves” — from this black hole merger, the scientists said they were able to extract information from closer to an event horizon than ever before. “This black hole horizon concept normally appears in science fiction,” lead study author Sizheng Ma of the Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics in Canada told AFP. “But now we are really able to touch the region around the horizon with gravitational data,” he added. “Sometimes I cannot believe this is really happening.”

The last stage of two black holes merging is like a spoon stirring a glass of water, Ma explained. The resulting swirl in space creates the ripple of gravitational waves that travel at the speed of light in all directions. If the metaphorical spoon is stirring close enough to the black hole’s event horizon, “this offers us a chance to decode the physics around that region,” Ma said. By supporting the theory of general relativity, the results “proved that Einstein was correct again,” he added.

The scientists emphasized that more research was needed to decipher what can be gleaned about event horizons using this method. But they did detect information about how black holes twist space around themselves as they rotate — a phenomenon known as “frame dragging.” “This is similar to pushing a glass into a table and twisting it, so that the tablecloth winds up around it,” Maximiliano Isi, a gravitational wave astrophysicist at Columbia University, told AFP. In the future, the scientists hope to find signs of tiny changes known as quantum fluctuations. “In this way, we can really probe this near-horizon region to look for new physics,” including searching for a deviation from general relativity, Ma said.

Better description, please

By necro81 • Score: 5, Informative Thread
There’s a lot of breathless reporting going on here (“Sometimes I cannot believe this is really happening.”) And a whole lot of rehashing about gravitational waves, LIGO, etc. - stuff that’s been around for years now. But very, very little explanation about what they’ve actually think they’ve found here. Fingerprints of the event horizon? What the hell does that even mean?

I was able to glean a tiny bit more from the article abstract (lack of Unicode support makes copy/paste difficult):

The horizon of a black hole, the ‘surface of no return’, is characterized by its rotation frequency [Omega_H] and surface gravity [Kappa]. A striking signature is that any infalling object appears to orbit at [Omega_H] owing to frame dragging, while its emitted signals decay exponentially at a rate set by [Kappa] as a consequence of gravitational redshift. Recent theoretical work [1] predicts that gravitational waves from binary black-hole mergers carry direct imprints of the properties of the merger remnant in the form of a ‘direct wave’. This gravitational-wave component oscillates near 2*[Omega_H], reflecting the horizon’s frame dragging, and decays at an increasing rate characterized by [Kappa], with additional screening from the black hole’s spacetime. Here we report observational evidence of a direct wave in GW2501142, with a 90% credible matched-filter signal-to-noise ratio of [Numbers and Uncertainty values] in the LIGO Hanford (Livingston) detector. The measured properties are in full agreement with theoretical predictions for a Kerr black hole. These findings establish an observational channel to directly measure frame-dragging effects in black-hole ergospheres and explore (near-)horizon physics in dynamical, strong-gravity regimes.

Still, without being in the gravitational-wave field, it’s still pretty hard to see what all the fuss is about.

skeptical astrophysicist

By ZipNada • Score: 3 Thread

From the cited article;

Sean McWilliams, an astrophysicist at West Virginia University, was skeptical that the gravitational wave frequency analyzed by the scientists was actually “dictated” by the event horizon.

For this reason, “the actual observed signal doesn’t really tell us anything about the horizon or the other properties directly related to it,” he told AFP.

Spain To Require Carriers To Keep Mobile Networks Live During Power Outages

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Reuters:
Spain will require mobile networks to have backup systems that maintain connectivity when power outages occur. Per a royal decree that will be approved by the end of 2026, mobile network operators (MNOs) and infrastructure companies will need to install batteries or other backups to keep service active for at least four hours during a blackout.

The mobile network rules will apply to businesses that serve at least 500,000 users or generate upwards of 50 million euros ($56.9 million) in annual revenue. The decree will stipulate that half of the population will need to be covered by this failsafe within the first year, then 65 percent in the second year and three quarters in the third.

[…] The decree will require other key infrastructure elements to remain up and running for a certain period after a power outage. For instance, control centers that could impact all of Spain if they were to go offline will need to remain in service for at least 24 hours. Emergency call centers will also need to have plans in place to maintain operations, as Reuters notes.
The move is in response to the widespread blackout across the Iberian peninsula in 2025, which left more than 50 million people without power. Experts called it “the most severe and unprecedented blackout that had occurred in Europe in the past 20 years.”

Re:Full Circle

By awwshit • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Ever see the giant batteries at your local Central Office that made that work?

Something like this:
https://www.facebook.com/photo…

Re:Full Circle

By Firethorn • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

I remember that, but things have improved a lot. A cell tower only takes 1-8kW, and we have drastically better batteries.
Plus, a lot fewer land lines, so need to keep the towers up for emergency services.

Re:You mean they somehow didn’t before?

By test321 • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Nordic:
* Finland: Requirement for 4G is 15 min https://www.kyberturvallisuusk…
* Norway: used to be 2-4 hours; was increased to 8-24 hours after the Spanish blackout https://www.telenor.com/who-we…

Non-Nordic:
* Netherlands (as comparison): These people say the network crashes in 4-8 hours https://www.localmesh.nl/en/co…

Re:cost?

By Alain Williams • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

What will the cost of not doing this be to: customers, emergency services, … ?

Re:Full Circle

By Tapewolf • Score: 5, Informative Thread

All mobile towers have battery backup. It’s a question of time. 24 hours is a lot and I wonder if the people who thought about this considered how achievable this was, especially if your network has a lot of micro cells.

24 hours is for critical infrastructure, “Control centers” as the summary puts it. For cell towers, they only mandated 4 hours which should be a lot easier.

Polestar Banned From Selling Cars In US From Model Year 2027

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Longtime Slashdot reader schwit1 shares a report from autoevolution:
The U.S. Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security denied Polestar an authorization under the Connected Vehicle Rule. Polestar will continue to sell its existing inventory of Polestar 3 and 4 crossovers in the United States and will continue to offer support to customers and access to its service network. But no new 2027 models will set wheels on American soil.

The Connected Vehicle Rule is a regulation that restricts the import and sale of vehicles equipped with Vehicle Connectivity Systems (VCS) and Automated Driving Systems (ADS) tied to foreign adversaries, primarily from China and Russia. Polestar is owned by Chinese auto giant Geely, which has also been the parent company of Swedish brand Volvo since 2010. However, Volvo has recently been granted authorization to sell connected vehicles in the United States.

The rule, set out by the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS), classifies modern vehicles as mobile data centers and is designed to protect national security by keeping sensitive driver data and vehicle control systems out of the hands of foreign governments. Michael Lohscheller, Polestar CEO, confirms that the company is well aware that the automotive industry is entering a new phase, based on regional dynamics. So, Polestar will shift its strategy to its biggest market as it is preparing its exit from the U.S. market.
The report notes that Polestar sold 5,384 cars in the U.S. in 2025, with 60,119 units sold globally.

Volvo but not Polestar?

By thegarbz • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Many of their cars share parts, and they certainly share data APIs. The Polestar plugin for home assistant was basically just a copy of Volvo’s.

Why do I get the feeling this is some person in the government thinking Volvo was still Swedish but Polestar is evil communism car.

Cool!

By ArchieBunker • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Next do Ford, GM, and Tesla.

Re:Volvo but not Polestar?

By dfghjk • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Volvo sells gas-powered cars. Killing Polestar is a twofer, it’s anti-Chiner AND anti-EV, plus Musk likes it.

"…designed to protect national security by keeping sensitive driver data and vehicle control systems out of the hands of foreign governments…”

Now there’s some complete nonsense. Nothing worse than having that data in the hands of Elon Musk.

Re:The best outcome…

By PPH • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The best possible outcome would be for everyone to release cars with no connectivity or automated driving systems.

Typical

By Pimpy • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

“The market will regulate itself”

Market shifts towards more competitive Chinese offerings

“No, not like that!”

Trump Administration Asks OpenAI To Stagger Release of New Model

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
The Trump administration has reportedly asked OpenAI to stagger the release of GPT-5.6 over security concerns. The model will initially be offered to a small group of partners, with the government “approving access customer by customer during this preview period,” reports The Information. The request came from conversations with the Office of the National Cyber Director and the Office of Science and Technology Policy, the report said.

Bygone days.

By fahrbot-bot • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

with the government “approving access customer by customer during this preview period,

Remember the days when Republicans said the government shouldn’t be picking winners and losers? Maybe that’s only when Democrats are in charge …

Re:Bygone days.

By Anonymous Coward • Score: 4, Informative Thread

I think Obama was one of our better presidents, but the government loaning Solyndra $535 was WRONG.

Just as a reality check, the loan to Solyndra was just one loan out of hundreds in the Department of Energy loan program, representing 1.6% of the total loans under that program. Despite a few companies that received loans having going bankrupt, overall the loan program made back the money loaned out with interest. The program did not lose money.

Since the program was intended to kick-start development of technologies that that were too risky to get loans from banks, the fact that the majority of the loans were paid back with interest indicates to me that the businesses chosen weren’t risky enough.

Re:Bygone days.

By jacks smirking reven • Score: 4, Informative Thread

December 19, 2008: President Bush approved a bailout plan and gave General Motors and Chrysler $13.4 billion in financing from TARP (Troubled Assets Relief Program) funds, as well as $4 billion to be “withdrawn later”.

It’s intentional that bad faith actors try and pin Obama with TARP. It’s the same when Trump gets a pass for the economy in 2020 but Biden must take all the blame for 2021.

Re: Bygone days.

By teg • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Republicans lost two presidential elections, 2008 & 2012, due to running conservative candidates. So they gave up and became a further-left party. Now Obama looks like a relative conservative .. but Clinton & Harris look conservative _too_.

Voters are insisting on left-wing presidents, with the exception of Biden because the initial leftist shock of Trump pt1 was too much to absorb.

The current GOP is not left. They’re extreme right at the moment - fascist-adjacent is not “minimal state”. There’s nothing conservative left, it’s been consumed by right wing populism with a mix of fascism The current administration. It’s corruption, populism, fascim, racism, disdain for knowledge, and plain stupidity in an ugly mix.

Re:Bygone days.

By Locke2005 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Yeah, your “Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY!” signature doesn’t make you look like a nut job at all!

Obama was not a perfect predident; no president is. I can think of plenty of things he got wrong. But the divisiveness was due to reactionary racists, not anything Obama did… other than being a black man in America. I’d also say the ADA was better than any alternatives, although Republicans did their best to make it not work. It was based on the principle that the only way to make healthcare affordable for really sick people to force health people to subsidize it. For some reason, that offends the people that don’t think they need health care.

Linux Foundation Launches Akrites To Coordinate AI-Driven Open Source Security

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
BrianFagioli writes:
The Linux Foundation has announced Akrites, a new initiative to coordinate vulnerability disclosure and remediation for critical open source software as AI dramatically speeds up vulnerability discovery. Founding members include AWS, Google, Microsoft, OpenAI, Red Hat, NVIDIA, IBM, Cisco, JPMorganChase, and others. Akrites will provide a shared Security Incident Response Team (SIRT), a standardized coordinated vulnerability disclosure process, and act as a “maintainer of last resort” for abandoned but widely used packages.

The goal is to reduce duplicate reports, avoid conflicting patches, and help upstream maintainers address vulnerabilities before they can be exploited. As AI makes it easier to find security flaws, can a coordinated industry effort help protect open source, or does it risk giving large corporations too much influence over the ecosystem?
“Akrites is the largest coordinated effort in history to create systems and deploy tooling that leverages the collective power of the community to make everyone safer,” the Linux Foundation said in an open letter. “Akrites participants will contribute engineering resources; work to build and ship fixes; or fund the engineers who do. Some companies have contributed mightily already. The reality is, collectively, we need to contribute more.”

Apple Raises Prices On Macs, iPads, and More By Hundreds of Dollars

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Apple has sharply raised prices across its Mac, iPad, HomePod, and Apple TV lineups as surging AI-driven demand creates a global memory and storage shortage. Increases range from $30 for the HomePod mini to $1,300 for the M3 Ultra Mac Studio, with Apple CEO Tim Cook saying efforts to shield customers from higher costs had become “unsustainable.” The Verge reports:
On Thursday, the company adjusted the price of its new MacBook Neo, which will now start at $699 instead of $599, while the base MacBook Air will jump to $1,299 from $1,099, as reported earlier by Bloomberg. The 14-inch MacBook Pro is getting an increase as well, going from $1,699 to $1,999. Meanwhile, the iPad Air will now start at $749 instead of $599, while the iPad Pro is increasing to $1,199 from $999.

As spotted by MacRumors, the M4 Max Mac Studio will now cost $2,499, a big jump from $1,999. The M3 Ultra Mac Studio is now priced at $5,299, up from $3,999. Apple is even raising the prices of its HomePod, which now costs $349 instead of $299, as well as bumping the price of the HomePod mini to $129 instead of $99. The Apple TV also now costs $199 instead of $129.

Re:Who’s Who?

By Brain-Fu • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

So, why DO people buy Apple? They know it is more expensive. Clearly, they believe they are getting something that is worth that price.

Apple goes to great efforts to protect user privacy. Some of what they do might just be promises and/or lies, but that is still better than the alternatives available, that openly spy on everything they can and sell it to whoever wants to buy it. For people who have the money to afford Apple products, it’s worth it.

Of course there are free open source solutions that protect privacy, but they require greater tech knowledge to use and have more compatibility issues (there are always a group of Linux users that get all bent out of shape when someone says this. Too bad. I use Linux a lot and I am very familiar with the issues that crop up that the Linux community likes to pretend don’t crop up).

There’s also the matter of user experience. When I use windows 11, I fell pushed-around and limited. When I use MacOS, I feel obeyed and empowered. Your mileage may vary, but this was enough for me to buy Apple.

I hate windows enough that my gaming rig runs Linux. I love Apple enough that my “everything serious” machine runs MacOS. Even with these price hikes, I will still go Apple over Windows any day of the week, should I need another machine for any purpose other than gaming.

Re:That’s perfectly okay!

By sit1963nz • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
HOWEVER…
If a Mac can save someone 1 hour a week in time because it works better for them, and their time is worth $100/hr, that comes out to be $5200 a year in increased productivity.

If Linux does the same for you, 100% go for it, likewise Windows.

The most expensive part of the computer is the person sitting at the keyboard.

Re:That’s perfectly okay!

By Jeremi • Score: 5, Funny Thread

I’m an Apple fan; I’m typing this on a 2018 Mac Mini that I spent roughly $2K on — but it’s 2026 and that Mac is still running just great. That works out to an amortized cost of about 68 cents per day — which is to say, negligible compared to my other expenses.

Trying to save money by buying cheap computer hardware is like trying to save money by buying single-ply toilet paper — you can do it, sure, but why make your life noticeably worse when the amount of money you’ll save is trivial?

Re:Who’s Who?

By BenBoy • Score: 5, Funny Thread

> Saved myself $1040. That was right before the price hikes.
Oof, bet that hurts. Think of how much you’d have saved if you’d waited until today …

Re:Because they can.

By Mousit • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

They raised prices because they can. The shortage gave them cover.

What really made it blatant was that they also raised prices in their Certified Refurbished store. You know, the store for shit which RAM costs were already long-ago paid.

LastPass Says Hackers Stole Customer Support Case Data During Klue Breach

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
LastPass says hackers stole customers’ personal information, support case records, and sales data by breaching market research partner Klue. The password manager told TechCrunch that its own systems and password vaults were unaffected. However, the hackers used their access to obtain “reams of data about LastPass customers,” the report says. From the report:
In a blog post that shared information about the incident, LastPass said the hackers took customers’ names, phone numbers, email addresses, and physical addresses, as well as customer support case data and sales-related data. It’s not yet known what was in the contents of customer support tickets, although they likely contain fragments of potentially private or sensitive information. Customers typically contact customer service when they are having a billing issue or need assistance in gaining access to their accounts. Past incidents involving customer support tickets have included credentials and government-issued identity documents.
The last data breach LastPass reported was in 2022, when hackers stole the company’s entire store of customer password vaults.

You’re having sex with every LastPass partner

By JoeyRox • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Password manager maker LastPass is notifying customers that their personal information and customer support case records were stolen during a recent hack at one of its technology partners, marking the company’s latest data breach in recent years.

The expression “when you have sex with someone, you’re having sex with every one of their partners as well” appears to apply to security software providers as well.

I guess …

By PPH • Score: 4, Funny Thread

… LastPass is Klue-less.

Potentially private or sensitive information?

By crunchy_one • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
I’d wager a guess that this information includes the accounts that the customer is using LastPass to store passwords for. Even without the passwords themselves, this could be some really juicy blackmail material.

I’ve seen enough

By Arrogant-Bastard • Score: 4, Informative Thread
Although to be more precise: I saw enough about LastPass years ago. This is the N’th security incident that they’ve publicly admitted. No doubt the number of incidents they’re aware of is higher, and no doubt the number of incidents they’re not aware of is still higher.

I think at this point it’s safe to presume that any information shared with LastPass has been compromised or will be compromised shortly. Part of that is because they’re incompetent, but most of it is because there’s no way for any operation to do what they’ve set out to do: the threat model is completely against them. What they’ve built is one-stop shopping for attackers, so it’s worth much more time, money, attention, and risk than many other operations. Obviously attackers know this and have planned/executed accordingly.

The right thing to do — which won’t happen because almost nobody does the right thing — is to admit failure, issue refunds, and shut down.

Number 6!

By gabrieltss • Score: 4, Informative Thread
This makes the 6th data breach they have had. Why anyone would still be using them is a total mystery to me!

There are roughly five -publicly- disclosed security incidents (how many not publicly disclosed?):
2011
2015 - one of the two of the worst
2016
2017
2022 - 2023 - the worst


Now you can add 2026 to the list

Anthropic Says Alibaba Must Be Punished For Largest Claude Cloning Attack

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica:
Anthropic has accused the Chinese firm Alibaba of launching the largest attack yet attempting to clone Claude, as China races to match the capabilities of Anthropic’s leading model following Mythos’ release and subsequent restriction from foreign markets. Ars obtained a June 10 letter sent to Senators Tim Scott (R-S.C.) and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) one day ahead of a Senate committee hearing on “AI and the American Dream.” In the letter, Anthropic shared “new, confidential evidence of the largest campaign to illicitly extract Claude’s capabilities we have ever measured.”

The attacks occurred between April 22 and June 5, when “operators afliated with Alibaba and Alibaba Qwen, Alibaba’s AI lab” allegedly generated “more than 28.8 million exchanges with Claude through almost 25,000 fraudulent accounts,” Anthropic said. Violating Claude’s terms of service and access restrictions, this campaign “targeted some of Claude’s most valuable capabilities, such as agentic reasoning, software engineering, and long-horizon tasks.” According to Anthropic, Alibaba evaded detection by “using obfuscation techniques and proxy networks.” As Chinese demand for reliable obfuscation techniques increases, Anthropic warned there’s already “a growing circumvention economy” to fuel an ever-expanding web of future distillation attacks. […]

“Alibaba is governed by an independent board, none of whom has any military affiliation,” Alibaba said. “Its products and services are built for retail, logistics, and enterprise information technology — not weapons, defense, or intelligence.” Anthropic appears unconvinced, however, that Alibaba isn’t working with the Chinese government. In the letter, Anthropic warned that without stronger interventions, these distillation attacks will “help China reach Mythos Preview-level capabilities sooner.”

To keep the US ahead of China, Anthropic recommended that Congress pass legislation with three objectives. First, antitrust laws must be updated to allow AI firms to share information about evolving Chinese tactics to deter more threats. Second, the US needs more export controls on chips to hamstring Chinese access to advanced compute so that they simply can’t train on US model outputs. That could make conducting distillation attacks pointless, Anthropic suggested. Finally, Congress should pass laws penalizing Chinese labs’ “bad behavior” so that it’s “more difficult and costly” to rely on distillation attacks to advance Chinese models. Penalties could include limiting Chinese firms from accessing US models or advanced US chips or from relying on data centers outside of China, Anthropic suggested.

Vizzini

By Anonymous Coward • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

You’re trying to kidnap what I’ve rightfully stolen!

World’s Biggest Raccoon

By bistromath007 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

“Don’t touch my garbage! I stole it fair and square!”

Pot… meet kettle…

By Morpeth • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

All of these massive LLM companies were built on stealing copyrighted materials and other prior work to train their models (and then profit from it without paying for the data/images/etc), so the whole thing is hilariously thick with irony. “Hey, you can’t steal the sh*t I stole!”

Now where did I put that teeny tiny violin…

Re:“Working with the government”

By XopherMV • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
Your comment completely ignores the previous one. In a communist society, companies and the government are one entity. They are the same. That is fundamentally different from how companies and government works in capitalist societies.

Re:“Working with the government”

By ceoyoyo • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

In communist societies communes are the companies and there is no government. Communes are like companies except the people who work in them own them. Thus “workers own the means of production.”

China isn’t communist. It’s not even the fake communist that you get when revolutionaries establish a “transitional government,” or the economically communist that China sort of was until Mao died. It is authoritarian, which is where the government has a lot of power to tell everyone what to do.

The GP didn’t ignore your original comment, they corrected it.

Ford Rehires 350 Engineers After AI Fails To Preserve Expertise or Train Juniors

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
After Ford’s automated quality-control systems and AI tools fell short, the automaker hired 350 veteran engineers over the past three years to mentor younger staff and reprogram the underperforming technology. “Artificial intelligence is a fantastic tool, but it’s only as good as the information you use to train it,” Charles Poon, Ford’s vice president of vehicle hardware engineering, told reporters on a call Wednesday. “Over prior years, we didn’t pay as much attention as we should have to the experience of our most knowledgeable engineers that have been with us through many product cycles.” Bloomberg reports:
Those engineers were “at the heart” of Ford’s efforts to turn around quality problems, said Kumar Galhotra, chief operating officer. They now run mandatory meetings that rigorously troubleshoot quality problems and they have reprogrammed AI tools to head off glitches before they happen. “We had been relying more and more on automated quality systems” and not getting the desired results, Galhotra said. “We brought back technical specialists” and “they hunt for failure points before a part ever reaches the plant floor.”

The return of the veteran engineers at Ford cuts against the prevailing wisdom — and fear — that AI will replace all kinds of knowledge workers. But Ford found the machines couldn’t replace experience. “Mistakenly we thought that by just introducing artificial intelligence and ingesting the design requirements that we had, that that would produce a high-quality product,” Poon said. But “we recognized that for us to enhance some of our automation and machine learning and artificial intelligence tools we needed to ensure that they were trained by the most experienced individuals.”

As a result of the efforts of the old hands, Ford vaulted above quality stalwarts such as Toyota and Honda on JD Power’s bellwether survey that measures the quality of a car during the first three months of ownership. Only luxury brands Porsche and Genesis topped Ford this year.

Re:Shows you what they were thinking

By Anonymous Coward • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
There’s a good chance that the rehired engineers will be hoarding critical information from this point forward. Unethical, but they’ve been treated unethically preemptively.

This is certainly debatable, but

By pr0t0 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
It’s not just about how to build the widget. I’ve long held that one of the most valuable assets an employee brings to his/her employer is their historical and institutional knowledge. Why all the various choices were made all along the way, where the skeletons are buried, and how to handle a specific vendor or customer to achieve the desired outcome often provide greater value than just how to tighten the nut on the bolt. A failure to recognize that is a failure of leadership.

Re:Shows you what they were thinking

By 93 Escort Wagon • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

The surprising part is that any of the engineers went back after the company had treated them like that. I guess they’ll just be saving money until they get sacked again.

What alternative do you think these guys had? They’ve got bills to pay and families to feed, and all of these companies have been dumping skilled employees like crazy due to leadership’s sophomoric belief that AI can do everything.

Re: Charles Poon

By Tomahawk • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Just like every other CEO that thinks AI is a magic bullet.

Re:Shows you what they were thinking

By gweihir • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

They are not super interested in thinking. Just in getting rich without effort, including mental effort.

Incidentally, I just saw a study that predicts that in 2028, LLM-code will be more expensive to get than code written by people. And that does not take insecurity, review-resistance, bad maintainability, loss of engineering skills and institutional knowledge, etc. into account. The whole thing is a massive hallucination by completely disconnected idiots.

Micron Locks In Historically High Memory Prices For Five Years

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Micron has signed 16 “strategic customer agreements” (SCAs) that include a floor price the company says comes with “a very robust gross margin for Micron, well above our peak quarterly margins in any past cycle.” Most of the deals run through 2030 and cover about 40% of Micron’s revenue. The Register reports:
Micron CEO, president and chairman Sanjay Mehrotra explained the SCAs in prepared remarks delivered during the company’s Q3 earnings call. He explained that Micron has signed 16 SCAs, most of them covering 2026 to 2030, and that they involve a commitment to buy a certain quantity of product and pay for it in a pricing band that has a floor and a ceiling price. The floor price covers the historically high gross margins mentioned above, and the ceiling price means those who commit to an SCA are insulated if memory prices go even higher.

The CEO said 16 customers have signed SCAs and then explained why it’s worth locking into the deals even though they bake in such high margins. “Our customers are recognizing that supply shortages in memory and storage will take considerable time to improve,” he said. “Even as we expect industry supply to improve gradually in 2028, we currently do not have line of sight as to when memory supply will be able to catch up with increasing demand.”

Even massive efforts to build new chip fabs aren’t much help, he said, because the increasing complexity of new memory types means it takes longer to build factories — and when they come online there still won’t be enough capacity to build both the high-bandwidth memory needed for AI and other types of NAND and DRAM. “Supply is structurally constrained in its growth and ability to meet industry demand, despite our comprehensive efforts to increase supply,” he said.

Don’t assume that SCAs mean your suppliers get price certainty, because Mehrotra said the deals will account for 40 percent of Micron revenue — meaning the company is reserving most of its inventory to sell at prices it can negotiate. The CEO did have a little good news in the form of predictions that Micron’s DRAM output in 2026 will “grow in the low- to mid-20s percentage range, slightly above our prior outlook.” He also revealed that the SCAs see customers pay up front, which helps Micron to fund its fab expansions.

Re:Genius?

By UnknowingFool • Score: 4, Funny Thread

You seem to suffer some reading comprehension issues. I take no offense. I stated that “I find it absolutely hilarious… This indicates that I am entertained, not offended.

You know we can scroll up, right? You wrote: “I find it absolutely hilarious when so many piss-poor plebeians like you say that others are morons.” Leaving out that part where you took offense is dishonest nd you know it. Now, you are trying to lie about wrote you wrote.

But, I can totally understand your mistake, if you’re not a native English speaker

How would you know? You don’t do you? That is just your attempt to insult me for calling you out by insinuating English is not my native language. But to my point you have yet to actually address a single point of his.

I feel like this signals something.

By nightflameauto • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

If a company is announcing that they’ve locked 16 bigger customers into historically high pricing, while locking themselves out of rising to meet future potential prices, is that a signal that we’ve about hit the peak of the memory demand / high-price cycle? Something tells me if they went out of their way to get these price floors in place, someone in the company saw the potential for that floor to be pierced in the next few months. I mean, you’d think the signing companies would consider this possibility too, but it’s entirely possible that FOMO on AI is keeping them at the peak of the wave during negotiations.

Something about this situation just strikes me as a tell. Maybe I’m wrong, but it seems like it’s a predictor of something changing.

Re:Raping users is back on the menu, boys!

By sabbede • Score: 4, Informative Thread
Prices are high because demand is exceeding supply. If the supply increases, the price will decrease. That’s basic economics.

That said, the fab would not have been completed yet, (this just happened a few weeks ago), so no, prices would not be lower today. Expanding supply remains necessary regardless, but 10 people denied everyone else the benefits, because they had a bug in their ass. And, quite possibly, Chinese funding.

I’d appreciate it if you backed off on the patronizing “summer child” tone. Economics doesn’t care.

Re:Raping users is back on the menu, boys!

By almitydave • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Prices are high because demand is exceeding supply. If the supply increases, the price will decrease. That’s basic economics.

That might be true if both prices and supply weren’t artificially fixed by a cartel. Note that there are even fewer major DRAM manufacturers now than there were then, so it’s much easier to ensure everyone’s in on the collusion. See also Gamer’s Nexus coverage.

No lessons were learned from the last time. The Samsung manager that went to prison got a promotion after being released. This Micron deal is absolutely them holding their customers over a barrel using limited supply to demand locked-in price deals. If you don’t sign up, you go to the back of the line. “It’d be a shame if you couldn’t buy RAM for that device you’re making.”

Micron boasts about price-fixing, loudly

By ebunga • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

What’s old is new again.

Google Starts Lowering Play Store Fees, Making Good On Epic Games Settlement

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica:
Google spent the last few years locked in a legal grudge match with Epic Games, which claimed that Google’s stewardship of the Play Store was anticompetitive. Now, the companies are thick as thieves, and Google is beginning to implement app store changes as agreed in its settlement with Epic. The lower developer fees and new payment options that Google promised are rolling out in select markets this month before expanding. […] Starting on June 30, developers in Europe, the UK, and the US will have access to the new fee structure. This system will split the commission into two components: billing and service fees.

The biggest win for small developers is the new flat 10 percent service fee for the first $1 million in earnings every year. Above that, the rate for various transaction types may reach 25 percent on existing installs. Apps installed after June 30 will top out at 20 percent. Developers will finally be allowed to send users outside the Play Store to complete a transaction, too. Google says they can design a choice screen “in accordance with our UX guidelines” to direct users to these external options. Devs pay the standard service fee on these purchases, but they’ll avoid the billing fee. All transactions that run through Google’s Play Store platform add a 5 percent billing fee — even the base rate for publishers earning less than $1 million. Google notes that the billing fee is set at 5 percent in the initial markets, but it could be different in other regions.
Google will expand the new fee structure globally through September 2027, while also offering reduced fees through updated developer programs.
Although the changes may let developers retain more revenue, Google will continue controlling Android distribution and collecting a share of sales as it works toward allowing certified third-party app stores to operate more like the Play Store.

New Study Shows That Tall Vehicle Hoods Cause Hundreds More Deaths Per Year

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
joshuark shares a report from Car and Driver:
A new study conducted by the New York Times shows that the increase in vehicle hood height seen over the last two and a half decades, mainly due to the rise in popularity of large SUVs and trucks, has resulted in several thousand deaths that otherwise may not have happened. The study shows that while automakers and regulators have focused on occupant safety, they have turned a blind eye to pedestrian safety, which has fallen since around 2009. Researchers looked at four main datasets in their investigation: crash test data from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s (NHTSA) Crash Report Sampling System (CRSS) from 2016 to 2024; NHTSA’s Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS); vehicle measurement data from Expert AutoStats; and vehicle registration data from S&P Global from 2002 to 2024. The researchers concluded that the increased danger to pedestrians is caused by two main culprits.

First, large SUVs and trucks have taller hoods, raising the point of impact above most people’s center of gravity and pushing them to the ground, typically hard asphalt, rather than up and onto the hood, which is designed to absorb impacts. Second, with larger A-pillars designed to protect occupants in rollover crashes, modern cars tend to have larger blind spots than cars sold at the turn of the century (presuming the 21st century). The shift toward vehicles with taller hoods led to roughly 3000 deaths between 2016 and 2024. This number is conservative because it does not include crashes that take place in parking lots, driveways, or private roads, which aren’t part of the federal database.

The data also showed an estimated 2.8 percent increase in the odds of a pedestrian fatality for every one-inch increase in vehicle hood height. Between two different scenarios, one decreasing the hood height of every vehicle in the dataset by 3 inches, and the second using a random sampling of hood heights from 2002 across 10,000 simulated crashes, between 2624 (for scenario two) and 3077 (for scenario one) lives could have been saved from 2016 to 2024.

Re: Taller hoods?

By dj245 • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Not to mention these vehicles are a huge pain to work on. I changed the spark plugs in a 150/1500 class truck recently and had to lay down on to of the engine on a chunk of old mattress to reach any of them. And needed a 2-step stepladder to get up there. I’ve since changed to a Ridgeline and you can reach anywhere in the bed and most of the engine without a ladder. The interest in the Slate and recent sales of smaller trucks suggest that this is a growing market.

Re:Build stupid cars

By JoshuaZ • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Unfortunately, the people buying or building the big cars are not the people being hit by them.

Re:Taller hoods?

By Insanity Defense • Score: 5, Informative Thread

You could do a study in other countries and compare the results. They have the same gadgets, but not the increased hoods on their cars. Once you corrected for the gadget distraction, you will still find higher casualty rates.

If you are American then no need. The U.S. postal service needed a replacement for one of the larger van styles and went electric. They listened to what the workers said and one was designed. Workers complained it was ugly and had limited range. Part of the ugly was a short, sharply down sloping “hood”. They were made to use it and found that ugly or not it was better. Designed for function over form. Ugly or not the workers loved it and both the workers and pedestrians ended with fewer injuries occurring.

Re:Why

By rocket rancher • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Why do cars have tall hoods, long hoods and off-centre driving positions? I dont think every car should be a go kart but I never understood why a centred view with more near visibility would not be desirable.

The off-center driver position is not the bad design choice here. That part is mostly boring old human-factors engineering. You are on the right track when you talk about a centered view with more near visibility. You just need a slightly bigger picture. In right-side traffic countries, the driver sits on the left because that puts the driver’s eyes closer to the centerline of the road, which improves sight lines for oncoming traffic, passing, lane placement, and not shaving the paint off opposing vehicles. The view you are optimizing is not the center line of the vehicle, but the center line of the road it is travelling down. In left-side traffic countries, you just mirror this. The “best” side is whichever side puts the driver closest to the middle of the road.

With that said, to bring this back to your question about tall and long hoods—the defenders of the modern brodozer will inevitably point to two things: physics and the EPA. They aren’t entirely wrong. Pushing modern trucks to absurd 15,000-lb towing capacities requires massive radiators, which dictate taller front ends. Furthermore, the EPA’s CAFE footprint rules actively incentivized automakers to bloat vehicle dimensions to qualify for laxer fuel economy targets. But while engineering requirements and federal loopholes provided the massive canvas, they don’t explain the aggressively hostile design language painted onto it.

The aesthetic decisions behind these front ends flow from a fairly straight-forward psychological model of the truck-buying American public. They are based on a phenomenon that social psychologists call “status signalling compensatory consumption.” Study after study show that an economically significant chunk of the male demographic buys status-signaling products to patch perceived deficits in their social power, status, identity, or masculinity. Marketing departments didn’t accidentally discover that pickups sell better when wrapped in dominance cosplay, cliff-face grillework, and ad copy that smells faintly of elk musk. These front ends aren’t optimized for pedestrian safety, or even aerodynamic efficiency; they are optimized to extract $80,000 from buyers desperate to project the authority they feel they lack.

Re:And water

By PsychoSlashDot • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Bet you feel much more safer in a thing with a battery that can’t be extinguished (and the dashcams will catch your screaming as you burn up).

So…

1} Aside from some Teslas, there’s nothing preventing an EV driver from getting out of a car that wouldn’t also prevent an ICE driver.
2} Basically nobody extinguishes an ICE fire either.
3} ICE are more prone to burning than EVs are.
4} Just as EV SUVs exist, ICE sedans exist. The height of the hood isn’t tied to powerplant.
5} Dashcams typically point out of the vehicle and rarely record audio (though many can).

NASA Rover Detects Potential Signatures of Ancient Microbial Life On Mars

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot
NASA’s Perseverance rover has detected complex organic carbon in ancient Martian mudstones. The measurements were taken by the rover’s Sherloc instrument and the organic carbon that was identified was from the Bright Angel outcrop, “a dried-up river that carried water into the planet’s Jezero crater billions of years ago,” notes The Guardian. From the report:
The form of carbon detected, known as macromolecular carbon or MMC, can originate from living organisms. Geological processes can also produce the material, meaning its detection does not amount to proof of past Martian life. Dr Ashley Murphy at the Planetary Science Institute in Arizona said MMC can be found in different settings and types of rocks. “It may originate from biological sources such as fossilized organic matter found in microbial mats and coal,” she said, but could also form in reactions between rocks and water or arrive on impacting meteorites.

The mudstone rocks from the Bright Angel outcrop caused a stir in 2024 when the Perseverance rover discovered intriguing surface spots and nodules that resemble features produced by fossilized microbes on Earth. When the scientific details were published last year, Sean Duffy, the former acting head of Nasa, said: “This very well could be the clearest sign of life that we’ve ever found on Mars.” […] The discovery means Nasa rovers have now found organic-bearing mudstones more than 2,000 miles apart on Mars. The others were reported by the Curiosity rover which is exploring the planet’s Gale crater. It “indicates that the habitability of Mars, and the availability of organics, may have been widespread across the planet billions of years ago,” the authors write in Science Advances.

Alternative headline

By greytree • Score: 4, Funny Thread
“Chemical that can form in reactions between rocks and water found where water ran over rocks.”

Hands off the MC MMC stage name, it’s mine.

By T34L • Score: 3, Insightful Thread

Seriously though, I’m glad they’re still searching, and it’s neat to see that even if we haven’t found life yet, even places as inhospitable as Mars probably had the building blocks of life at some point and another. If life-forming environments are common and life isn’t, it’s positive points towards our chances of being past the great filter; I sure welcome those these days.

Alternative article

By 4im • Score: 5, Informative Thread

https://www.space.com/astronomy/mars/did-nasa-just-find-evidence-of-ancient-life-on-mars-perseverance-rover-spots-complex-carbon-in-red-planet-rocks

No need to accept cookie-raping-or-subscription The Guardian, when you can reject cookies from others.

More clarity on Fermis Paradox.

By Qbertino • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

It’s taking shape: Basic life may actually be quite common. Naked apes typing on keyboards on a digital network they built themselves not so much.

The rare earth and rare advanced intelligent life theories just got some extra weight.

It’s never aliens.

By gurps_npc • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

This is about the 5th time I remember someone saying they found ‘signs’ of alien life, and it never is.