Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Ozempic is Reshaping the Fast Food Industry
  2. Half of World’s CO2 Emissions Come From Just 32 Fossil Fuel Firms, Study Shows
  3. Adobe Acrobat Now Lets You Edit Files Using Prompts, Generate Podcast Summaries
  4. The Gold Plating of American Water
  5. AI Company Eightfold Sued For Helping Companies Secretly Score Job Seekers
  6. Ubisoft Cancels Six Games, Slashes Guidance in Restructuring
  7. Ireland Wants To Give Its Cops Spyware, Ability To Crack Encrypted Messages
  8. Google Temporarily Disabled YouTube’s Advanced Captions Without Warning
  9. Japan Restarts World’s Largest Nuclear Plant as Fukushima Memories Loom Large
  10. Comic-Con Bans AI Art After Artist Pushback
  11. YouTube CEO Acknowledges ‘AI Slop’ Problem, Says Platform Will Curb Low-Quality AI Content
  12. CEOs Say AI is Making Work More Efficient. Employees Tell a Different Story.
  13. Verizon Wastes No Time Switching Device Unlock Policy To 365 Days
  14. Snap Settles Social media Addiction Lawsuit Ahead of Landmark Trial
  15. Aurora Watch In Effect As Severe Solar Storm Slams Into Earth

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Ozempic is Reshaping the Fast Food Industry

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
New research from Cornell University has tracked how households change their spending after someone starts taking GLP-1 medications like Ozempic and Wegovy, and the numbers are material enough to explain why food industry earnings calls keep blaming everything except the obvious culprit.

The study analyzed transaction data from 150,000 households linked to survey responses on medication adoption. Households cut grocery spending by 5.3% within six months of a member starting GLP-1s; high-income households cut by 8.2%. Fast food spending fell 8.0%. Savory snacks took the biggest hit at 10.1%, followed by sweets and baked goods. Yogurt was the only category to see a statistically significant increase.

As of July 2024, 16.3% of U.S. households had at least one GLP-1 user. Nearly half of adopters reported taking the medication specifically for weight loss rather than diabetes management. About 34% of users discontinue within the sample period, and when they stop, candy and chocolate purchases rise 11.4% above pre-adoption levels.

Further reading: Weighing the Cost of Smaller Appetites.

Half of World’s CO2 Emissions Come From Just 32 Fossil Fuel Firms, Study Shows

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
Just 32 fossil fuel companies were responsible for half the global carbon dioxide emissions driving the climate crisis in 2024, down from 36 a year earlier, a report has revealed. The Guardian:
Saudi Aramco was the biggest state-controlled polluter and ExxonMobil was the largest investor-owned polluter. Critics accused the leading fossil fuel companies of “sabotaging climate action” and “being on the wrong side of history” but said the emissions data was increasingly being used to hold the companies accountable.

State-owned fossil fuel producers made up 17 of the top 20 emitters in the Carbon Majors report, which the authors said underscored the political barriers to tackling global heating. All 17 are controlled by countries that opposed a proposed fossil fuel phaseout at the Cop30 UN climate summit in December, including Saudi Arabia, Russia, China, Iran, the United Arab Emirates and India. More than 80 other nations had backed the phaseout plan.

And we all use their products

By Bolkar • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
The uncomfortable truth is this, every one of us uses their products, in one way or another. The electricity that lights our homes. The fuel that moves our cars, buses, ships, and airplanes. The concrete, steel, plastics, fertilizers, medicines, and electronics that make modern life possible. The food system, the construction industry, global logistics, heating, cooling, data centers, all of it is built on energy supplied largely by fossil fuels. Those 32 companies did not emit carbon in a vacuum. They extracted and sold what the world demanded, and the world governments, industries, cities, and individuals bought it. This does not absolve these corporations of responsibility. Many knew the consequences decades ago, funded misinformation, and delayed the transition. Accountability matters. Regulation matters. Transparency matters. But pretending this is only a “them” problem lets the rest of us off the hook too easily. Climate change is not just a story of bad actors, it’s a story of a system we all participate in, willingly or not. We live in cities designed around cars. We inhabit buildings that require energy intensive materials. We rely on global supply chains optimized for cost, not carbon. Even the devices we use to read climate reports depend on fossil fuel powered infrastructure. Real solutions won’t come from scapegoating alone. They come from: - Changing how energy is produced, - Redesigning how cities are built, - Rethinking how we move, consume, and invest, - And demanding both corporate accountability and systemic transformation. Yes, 32 companies sit at the center of the problem. But 7+ billion people are connected to it. If half of emissions come from a few firms, the opportunity is just as clear: changing the system upstream can change everything downstream. The transition is possible, but only if we stop pretending we’re not part of the story.

The emissions happen when the fuel is burned.

By AmazingRuss • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Who buys burns the fuel? Their customers Will the emissions stop if the customers stop burning the fuel. Yes. Will they continue to produce the fuel if customers stop buying it? No. I know a lot of you are itching to tell me about how this is all a plot by big oil to trick people into taking responsibility for the fuel they purchase and burn. Don’t bother. The oil companies will keep selling it as long as we buy it. Emissions will happen for as long as we keep burning the fuel. And no, you don’t need to drive to Costco for the 3rd time this week.

Graphics Cards all over the world …

By mlheur • Score: 3 Thread

… use chips made by just 3 companies.

EVERYBODY PANIC!!!!

Stupid logic

By DamnOregonian • Score: 3 Thread
I’m not a climate denier- not even a tiny little bit.
But this is some boneheaded fucking logic.
Saying that the producer of the fuel is the one responsible for the emissions when it is burnt is just a weak fucking attempt at reducing the web of responsibility to someone easier to target, when the real culprit is staring at you in the mirror.

No, only 15%. The rest are the consumer.

By SubmergedInTech • Score: 3 Thread

See https://www.iea.org/reports/em…

“Today, oil and gas operations account for around 15% of total energy-related emissions globally, the equivalent of 5.1 billion tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions.”

The 50% number is like claiming that Taco Bell is responsible for the water use of people flushing the toilet after eating a taco.

Adobe Acrobat Now Lets You Edit Files Using Prompts, Generate Podcast Summaries

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
Adobe has added a suite of AI-powered features to Acrobat that enable users to edit documents through natural language prompts, generate podcast-style audio summaries of their files, and create presentations by pulling content from multiple documents stored in a single workspace.

The prompt-based editing supports 12 distinct actions: removing pages, text, comments, and images; finding and replacing words and phrases; and adding e-signatures and passwords. The presentation feature builds on Adobe Spaces, a collaborative file and notes collection the company launched last year. Users can point Acrobat’s AI assistant at files in a Space and have it generate an editable pitch deck, then style it using Adobe Express themes and stock imagery.

Shared files in Spaces now include AI-generated summaries that cite specific locations in the source document. Users can also choose from preset AI assistant personas — “analyst,” “entertainer,” or “instructor” — or create custom assistants using their own prompts.

The Gold Plating of American Water

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
The price of water and sewer services for American households has more than doubled since the early 1980s after adjusting for inflation, even though per-capita water use has actually decreased over that period. Households in large cities now spend about $1,300 a year on water and sewer charges, approaching the roughly $1,600 they spend on electricity. The main driver is federal regulation.

Since the Clean Water Act of 1972 and the Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974, the U.S. has spent approximately $5 trillion in contemporary dollars fighting water pollution — about 0.8% of annual GDP across that period. The EPA itself admits that surface water regulations are the one category of environmental rules where estimated costs exceed estimated benefits.

New York City was required to build a filtration plant to address two minor parasites in water from its Croton aqueduct. The project took a decade longer than expected and cost $3.2 billion, more than double the original estimate. After the plant opened in 2015, the city’s Commissioner of Environmental Protection noted that the water would basically be “the same” to the public. Jefferson County, Alabama, meanwhile, descended into what was then the largest municipal bankruptcy in U.S. history in 2011 after EPA-mandated sewer upgrades pushed its debt from $300 million to over $3 billion.

Re:How does one plate water?

By TwistedGreen • Score: 5, Informative Thread

It’s a specific jargon term in project management:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…

Never Ending Inflation

By JBMcB • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
In 2017 NYC opened a brand new 400 square foot public bathroom in a public park in Brooklyn. It cost $2 million. That’s roughly $5000 a square foot. You could walk across the street and purchase a larger home for a quarter of that price. Nobody can account for it’s cost. The official response is - shrug, yeah stuff costs a lot.

It should be an ongoing, continuous, strictly enforced law that any project over a few hundred thousand needs an independent audit conducted. A 10% cost overrun is understandable. A 200%-400% cost overrun is criminal. It happens all the time, continuously, everywhere.

Yeah, it’s a “minor” problem until

By Inglix the Mad • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
You are the one who has to deal with the problem. All you have to do is look at Flint to see why it costs so much: We’ve spent decades ignoring our water system in large swaths of the country so that now we’re playing catch up. Look at how many cities still have lead service lines.

Re:Never Ending Inflation

By wiggles • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

You know exactly why things are not more transparent — because we keep electing the people who have a vested interest in keeping things hidden. But what are you going to do - vote for the other party?

One other contributor

By necro81 • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
It’s easy to point to the NYC plant as an example. The whole article reads like a libertarian hit piece “regulation is da evillll! We’re so oppressed. Government can’t do anything right.”

I wonder though: how much of the increased cost is due to genuine improvements and maintenance?

It is worth noting that urban decay in the 70s, 80s, and 90s led to a huge backlog of deferred maintenance. (That, and human laziness in general.) We’re constantly hearing stories along the lines of “a water main dating to the 1800s burst....It was never meant to hold up to this.” Today lots of cities are painfully (and expensively) working through that backlog, either because leaks/breakage have forced the issue, or because they’re finally realizing that those pipes in the ground were never meant to last forever.

We’re also hearing stories about how storm sewers overflowing cause sewage plants to overflow into waterways. This used to just be accepted practice (“well shit…it’s shit!”). Now, because we’d like to actually be able to use our rivers without catching e coli, and because climate change makes downpours more common, municipalities are starting to separate storm sewers from sanitary sewers.

Speaking for myself, my household water bill is never more than $50/mo. (It was about $30/mo until recently, when the city took out a massive bond to…replace all the old pipes, upgrade the treatment plant, and better manage storm water.) For every one of me, there’s some household spending 3x as much each month to average $100/mo. Who is using that much water?!

Still, in my opinion, worth every penny. I’ve been to places where you couldn’t drink the water, and places with no indoor plumbing at all. I really don’t mind paying for what I’ve got.

AI Company Eightfold Sued For Helping Companies Secretly Score Job Seekers

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
Eightfold AI, a venture capital-backed AI hiring platform used by Microsoft, PayPal and many other Fortune 500 companies, is being sued in California for allegedly compiling reports used to screen job applicants without their knowledge. From a report:
The lawsuit, filed on Tuesday accusing Eightfold of violating the Fair Credit Reporting Act shows how consumer advocates are seeking to apply existing law to AI systems capable of drawing inferences about individuals based on vast amounts of data.

Santa Clara, California-based Eightfold provides tools that promise to speed up the hiring process by assessing job applicants and predicting whether they would be a good fit for a job using massive amounts of data from online resumes and job listings. But candidates who apply for jobs at companies that use those tools are not given notice and a chance to dispute errors, job applicants Erin Kistler and Sruti Bhaumik allege in their proposed class action. Because of that, they claim Eightfold violated the FCRA and a California law that gives consumers the right to view and challenge credit reports used in lending and hiring.

Many companies collect data and train AI with it

By dmomo • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

I’m not saying that the AI company shouldn’t readily seek permission to harvest and use personal data, but it’s far from a special case. Take Palantir for instance. Are they not doing the same thing?

It seems odd that the onus is on the third-party platform to be transparent to the candidates about data collection and AI use, and not the companies using the tool.

I am all for this lawsuit being successful if it sets a precedent for all AI companies using our data. But if the scope is specifically around the hiring process, I think the individual companies should be held accountable for using the tool without candidates’ consent or knowledge.

Ubisoft Cancels Six Games, Slashes Guidance in Restructuring

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
Ubisoft is canceling game projects, shutting down studios and cutting its guidance as the Assassin’s Creed maker restructures its business into five units. From a report:
The French gaming firm expects earnings before interest and tax to be a loss of $1.2 billion the fiscal year 2025-2026 as a result of the restructuring, driven by a one-off writedown of about $761 million, the company said in a statement on Wednesday.

Ubisoft also expects net bookings of around $1.76 billion for the year, with a $386 million gross margin reduction compared to previous guidance, it said. Six games, including a remake of Prince of Persia The Sands of Time, have been discontinued and seven other unidentified games are delayed, the company said. The measures are part of a broader plan to streamline operations, including closing studios in Stockholm and Halifax, Canada. Ubisoft said it will have cut at least $117 million in fixed costs compared to the latest financial year by March, a year ahead of target, and has set a goal to slash an additional $234 million over the next two years.

Medical Release Simulator GOTY Edition

By Pseudonymous Powers • Score: 3 Thread

I tried playing Assassin’s Creed one time. I think my character spent like two of the first three hours on his back in a sensory deprivation tank.

I knew this would happen once we started giving video game characters names that aren’t just compounds of the thing they’re doing, like “Jumpman”.

Bloat

By LordAba • Score: 3 Thread

I usually roll my eyes when people say the economy relies on infinite growth, but the AAA games industries are really a microcosm of that philosophy. Bigger and bigger bloat and a focus on monetization instead of innovation until the bubble bursts… they are chasing whales instead of general audiences.

Here is a video on steam and video game price trends.

Ireland Wants To Give Its Cops Spyware, Ability To Crack Encrypted Messages

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
The Irish government is planning to bolster its police’s ability to intercept communications, including encrypted messages, and provide a legal basis for spyware use. From a report:
The Communications (Interception and Lawful Access) Bill is being framed as a replacement for the current legislation that governs digital communication interception. The Department of Justice, Home Affairs, and Migration said in an announcement this week the existing Postal Packets and Telecommunications Messages (Regulation) Act 1993 “predates the telecoms revolution of the last 20 years.”

As well as updating laws passed more than two decades ago, the government was keen to emphasize that a key ambition for the bill is to empower law enforcement to intercept of all forms of communications. The Bill will bring communications from IoT devices, email services, and electronic messaging platforms into scope, “whether encrypted or not.”

In a similar way to how certain other governments want to compel encrypted messaging services to unscramble packets of interest, Ireland’s announcement also failed to explain exactly how it plans to do this. However, it promised to implement a robust legal framework, alongside all necessary privacy and security safeguards, if these proposals do ultimately become law. It also vowed to establish structures to ensure “the maximum possible degree of technical cooperation between state agencies and communication service providers.”/i

Incompatible requirements

By unrtst • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The “bill is to empower law enforcement to intercept of all forms of communications,” and it also, “promised to implement … necessary privacy and security safeguards.”
Those goals are incompatible, full stop.

An Taoiseach

By Tomahawk • Score: 3 Thread

It’ll just take a low-level cyber-criminal to send An Taoiseach a copy of all his messages to the members of the DÃil or members of his family, and it’ll be undone soon enough. Maybe.

Well this won’t be misused regularly

By Inglix the Mad • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
Oh wait - it most certainly will. Just look at the so-called USA PATRIOT Act or Flock Safety cameras or Palantir or any of a dozen other crappy things.

I get it, we want to catch criminals. However some people who should be subject to having that stuff on their communications devices FULL TIME should be every person with a wealth over 10 times the low median average, every government official, and every member of the police.

That way when it’s misused, or has data stolen, that data is front and center.

That’s really laughable

By sentiblue • Score: 4, Informative Thread
On the one hand European governments enforce extremely strict laws about privacy. On the other, they give themselves the ability to steal any kind of communication they want. Security safeguards? Are they all doing drugs? What stops a cop (who already has access) from using it illegally in a stealthy way? Who stops him from selling that information, or worst, using it for blackmailing?

If the government can read your communications

By oldgraybeard • Score: 4, Informative Thread
Everyone can read your communications

Google Temporarily Disabled YouTube’s Advanced Captions Without Warning

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
Google has temporarily disabled YouTube’s advanced SRV3 caption format after discovering the feature was causing playback errors for some users, according to a statement the company posted. SRV3, also known as YouTube Timed Text, is a custom subtitle system Google introduced around 2018 that allows creators to use custom colors, transparency, animations, and precise text positioning. Creators cannot upload new SRV3 captions while the feature remains disabled, and existing videos that use the format may not display any captions until Google restores it. The company has provided no timeline for when SRV3 will return, and its forum post notes that changes should be temporary for “almost” all videos.

Also mucking with filters

By unixisc • Score: 3 Thread

Also in YouTube filters, they are making it less functional. When one clicks on filters and tries to sort by Upload date, one sometimes sees it, and sometimes doesn’t. In the new YouTube, they’ll just offer “Relevance” and “View Count”. If one wants to see the most recent uploads on a subject, one is SOL

The enshittifcation of both software and the internet aggressively continues

Japan Restarts World’s Largest Nuclear Plant as Fukushima Memories Loom Large

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
New submitter BeaverCleaver shares a report:
Japan has restarted operations at the world’s largest nuclear power plant for the first time since the 2011 Fukushima disaster forced the country to shut all of its reactors. The decision to restart reactor number 6 at Kashiwazaki-Kariwa north-west of Tokyo was taken despite local residents’ safety concerns. It was delayed by a day because of an alarm malfunction and is due to begin operating commercially next month.

Japan, which had always heavily relied on energy imports, was an early adopter of nuclear power. But in 2011 all 54 of its reactors had to be shut after a massive earthquake and tsunami triggered a meltdown at Fukushima, causing one of the worst nuclear disasters in history. This is the latest installment in Japan’s nuclear power reboot, which still has a long way to go. The seventh reactor at Kashiwazaki-Kariwa is not expected to be brought back on until 2030, and the other five could be decommissioned. That leaves the plant with far less capacity than it once had when all seven reactors were operational: 8.2 gigawatts.

Is there an article?

By eepok • Score: 5, Funny Thread

I appreciate the contribution and insight of the esteemed Slashdotter “BeaverCleaver”, but typically there’s an article link that comes along with a summary,

From BBC? (link)

By Tablizer • Score: 5, Informative Thread

https://www.bbc.com/news/artic…

Backup Generators should not be at ground level.

By AgTiger • Score: 5, Informative Thread

For those who need a refresher as to how the failure of the Fukushima reactors, see this video:

Understanding the accident of Fukushima Daiichi (from 2012)
https://youtu.be/YBNFvZ6Vr2U

Total time: 13:01. The key bit is at 4:49: “The waves went over the sea wall flooding the lower parts of buildings, and disabled the emergency diesel generators.”

Had those generators and fuel tanks been higher up in the structure, things probably would have been fine, but with the reactors in control-rod shutdown and needing to dissipate the residual heat in the reaction chambers, the secondary cooling systems powered by those emergency diesel generators were absolutely crucial.

Context

By kid_wonder • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Worth noting: Kashiwazaki-Kariwa Nuclear Power Plant wasn’t offline because it was unsafe to operate, but because Japan rewrote its nuclear rulebook after Fukushima. The post-2011 requirements are much stricter (earthquakes, tsunamis, backup power, security), and it’s taken years to get approvals. Reactor 6 got through first since it’s newer and already had upgrades.

The restart push is mostly about energy reality: Japan imports most of its fuel, LNG got expensive, and cutting emissions without nuclear is hard. Local opposition is still a factor though, especially given the seismic risks, which is why the rest of the plant is still years away from full operation — if it ever gets there.

Re:Woah

By Whateverthisis • Score: 4, Informative Thread
A couple of things, and caveat I spent a brief time working in the nuclear industry in a consulting capacity, and I was in a hotel on a business trip having a drink with the VP of Bus Dev of Westinghouse Nuclear watching the news reports of Fukushima as it literally happened right then.

First, in the Japanese cultural psyche nuclear power is a very prominent thing. Japan has the dubious distinction of being the only country in the world to have been hit with nuclear weapons in anger, and the cultural shock of that paired with the utter destruction of their society after WW2 was very significant. You can see it in the subtext of their culture, for example the entire Godzilla franchise is heavily influenced by the fears of nuclear power and the devastation it can wreak on society. Even in anime, the various Macross franchises, they used the term “reaction engine” or “reaction warheads” as a coded word for “nuclear” because the word nuclear has a very strong cultural reaction to it, and nearly every Macross series you see has some angle of some super weapon that could, and often does, destroy entire worlds. It’s deep in the cultural psyche there, so when there is a problem and the word “nuclear” is attached to it, the society there shifts around it.

After Fukushima, Japan shut down all 54 of their nuclear power plants in response. That of course made them a massive importer of fossil fuels, whcih they don’t have natural access to. Fears and cultural issues with the term nuclear eventually were bested by pure economic factors; nuclear is cleaner than fossil fuels, provides more power, and has a less supply chain issues while giving Japan greater control over it’s energy grid. Around 15 reactors have started back up under stricter safety guidelines.

To your point about plants having gravity fed cooling and multiple backups, that’s not exactly true. Modern reactors, like the AP1000 use gravity cooling, this is called a Gen III+ reactor. The issue though is that reactors are really expensive to set up, and often times it’s more economical to extend the service life of an older reactor than build a new one. So while you are correct about new built reactors, most Gen 1 reactors are retired but many Gen 2 reactors are still active and do not have those features. In the specific case of Fukushima and Japan, Japan has a very unique challenge. You always want to build nuclear reactors near water so you have active sources of cooling. For Japan, that means the coast. The problem though is that Japan is also very seismically active. Fukushima was designed to withstand some severe earthquakes and had pumps that were fully automated that should be able to keep the reactor cool for 1-2 days in an emergency, which is often enough to bring in more permanent solutions. What happened with Fukushima it was hit by a greater than 9.0 earthquake off the coast which created a tsunami (it’s notable we use the Japanese word for tsunamis because they’re so common there). The massive tsunami came in and wiped out the generators that run the pumps, knocking out all of it’s backup cooling stations. The plant, 40 years old, did what it was supposed to do, but was hit with something beyond it’s design specs.

And that’s the real issue. An AP1000 could have managed Fukushima due to it’s passive cooling, but the vast majority of active reactors are Gen 2. Most Gen 2s are good, but they don’t have those passive systems, they still rely on generators and pumps for the cooling. Japan built it’s reactors knowing their seismic situation, but the earthquake that hit Fukushima was exceptionally large and beyond what it could do.

Comic-Con Bans AI Art After Artist Pushback

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
San Diego Comic-Con changed an AI art friendly policy following an artist-led backlash last week. From a report:
It was a small victory for working artists in an industry where jobs are slipping away as movie and video game studios adopt generative AI tools to save time and money. Every year, tens of thousands of people descend on San Diego for Comic-Con, the world’s premier comic book convention that over the years has also become a major pan-media event where every major media company announces new movies, TV shows, and video games. For the past few years, Comic-Con has allowed some forms of AI-generated art at this art show at the convention.

According to archived rules for the show, artists could display AI-generated material so long as it wasn’t for sale, was marked as AI-produced, and credited the original artist whose style was used. “Material produced by Artificial Intelligence (AI) may be placed in the show, but only as Not-for-Sale (NFS). It must be clearly marked as AI-produced, not simply listed as a print. If one of the parameters in its creation was something similar to ‘Done in the style of,’ that information must be added to the description. If there are questions, the Art Show Coordinator will be the sole judge of acceptability,” Comic-Con’s art show rules said until recently.

The actual policy

By Geoffrey.landis • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Would have been informative if the summary gave the ACTUAL new policy, instead of just “they changed the policy” without saying what they changed it to.

From the article, the new policy is straightforward:

“Material created by Artificial Intelligence (AI) either partially or wholly, is not allowed in the art show,” it now says. AI is now banned at the art show.

YouTube CEO Acknowledges ‘AI Slop’ Problem, Says Platform Will Curb Low-Quality AI Content

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
YouTube CEO Neal Mohan used his annual letter to creators, published Wednesday, to outline an ambitious 2026 vision that embraces AI-powered creative tools while simultaneously pledging to crack down on the low-quality AI content that has come to be known as “slop.”

Mohan identified four AI-related areas that YouTube “must get right in 2026.” The platform is working on tools that will let creators use AI to generate Shorts featuring their own likenesses and to experiment with music. “Just as the synthesizer, Photoshop and CGI revolutionized sound and visuals, AI will be a boon to the creatives who are ready to lean in,” he wrote. Features like autodubbing, he says, will “transform the viewer experience.”

But “the rise of AI has raised concerns about low-quality content, aka ‘AI slop,’" he wrote. YouTube is building on its existing spam and clickbait detection systems to reduce the spread of such content. He also flagged deepfakes as a particular concern: “It’s becoming harder to detect what’s real and what’s AI-generated.” The platform plans to double down on AI labels and introduce tools that let creators protect their likenesses.

“transform the viewer experience.”

By TigerPlish • Score: 3, Insightful Thread

will “transform the viewer experience.”

You mean.. from “I only use you on friday night on a phone call with an old friend, and too look up how to fix my car / washer / dryer whatever” to “Not using you at all?”

Seriously. Slashdot Collective says ‘eat the rich?’ I say “fuck all the techbros.”

Yes, I’m narrowing down the carnage to just the techbros (and tech sisters, like that nutjob that headed Theranos)

They’ve unleashed a new cancer on society, by amplifying voices that were best left handing out flyers at street intersections. Not everyone deserves to have the biggest bullhorn in the world.

We need to stop AI slop. By creating more AI slop.

By nightflameauto • Score: 3 Thread

How did this guy keep his head from splitting in two the way he’s talking out both sides of his mouth? Stop AI slop by creating more AI slop? What? Do these fools even listen to themselves anymore?

Low effort

By JBMcB • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
I like watching court cam videos, and Youtube is *constantly* recommending clone channels that clearly download someone else’s video, slaps on an AI generated thumbnail and summary, then re-uploads it. I think the entire thing is automatic. I keep reporting the channels and Youtube keeps recommending more.

So, saying they are “cracking down” is kind of funny, as they aren’t even doing the bare minimum enforcing their existing policies.

Give me a button that i press

By Z80a • Score: 3 Thread

And it pops up a menu where i can select both subtitles and voice language, and make this button remember the setting for all videos.
Is this THAT hard?

They don’t get it

By brunes69 • Score: 3 Thread

He says they are going to combat AI Slop, in the same breath as he says they are rolling out tools to make creating it easier.

I don’t think this guy understands what most people think “AI Slop” even is. “Remixing existing content”, *IS* slop. It is low effort, low value, garbage.

CEOs Say AI is Making Work More Efficient. Employees Tell a Different Story.

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
Companies are spending vast sums on AI expecting the technology to boost efficiency, but a new survey from AI consulting firm Section found that two-thirds of non-management workers among 5,000 white-collar respondents say they save less than two hours a week or no time at all, while more than 40% of executives report the technology saves them upward of eight hours weekly.

Workers were far more likely to describe themselves as anxious or overwhelmed about AI than excited — the opposite of C-suite respondents — and 40% of all surveyed said they would be fine never using AI again. A separate Workday report of roughly 1,600 employees found that though 85% reported time savings of one to seven hours weekly, much of it was offset by correcting errors and reworking AI-generated content — what the company called an “AI tax” on productivity.

At the World Economic Forum in Davos this week, a PricewaterhouseCoopers survey of nearly 4,500 CEOs found more than half have seen no significant financial benefit from AI so far, and only 12% said the technology has delivered both cost and revenue gains.

The verdict is now clear

By gtall • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

CEOs can be profitably replaced by AI whereas the line workers not.

Re:New World Order.

By Lunati Senpai • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

So you’re saying, you can be easily replaced with AI.

AI is fantastic for doing things like summarizing points, doing things like booking appointments and following a preset of instructions with some variance.

It’s also good for digging into things and getting research. It’s also great at getting the mathematically most common opinion on almost any subject, but you need to be able to tell when it’s making stuff up.

DEI would be I can’t hire someone based on some quality not related to their skill, so need to hire the “most skilled” ‘worker for that position, whatever that is.

Although I’m a chick, so I know from experience if I use my initials, I’ll get more interviews than if I put my name, and modify nothing else on my resume, so I’m probably blatantly biased in favor of DEI because I have personal experience with it. If you believe it means something else, you really need to sit down and read it.

Done properly, it looks something like Blind Auditions which many orchestras use to eliminate bias when interviewing candidates, so they can focus specifically on the quality of music each person makes. Orchestras went from 99% male to 50/50.

As always, depends on the work, AI like any other tool has its strengths and weaknesses. Knowing our propensity for busy work though, we’re probably going to end up with job positions for AI prompt copy editing soon enough, making sure the prompts made for the AI are properly formatted to minimize the chance of hallucinations. It’s the usual wheel of tech, we’ll eliminate a bunch of jobs, lots of people will be out of work due to not using the new skill, and we pay a premium for that skill until we can boil it down until that skill doesn’t matter anymore.

unpopular opinion

By Escogido • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Two observations:

1. AI amplifies existing competence. Current AI systems are not autonomous problem-solvers — they are accelerants. Users who already understand their domain can spot errors, ask better follow-up questions, and integrate outputs efficiently. For less experienced or less analytical workers, AI often creates rework rather than savings, which is consistent with the “AI tax” described in the surveys.

It’s not strictly about being “smart,” but also about task structure and feedback loops. Some highly capable workers are in environments where AI cannot be safely or efficiently applied (compliance-heavy workflows, fragmented tooling, high-stakes accuracy requirements).

2. Impact varies strongly by role, as knowledge work is not homogeneous. Roles involving synthesis, drafting, ideation, coding, analysis, or decision support benefit far more than roles dominated by coordination, approvals, interpersonal judgment, or rigid process constraints. Executive workflows are especially well suited to AI assistance, which explains the perception gap between leadership and individual contributors.

Also, adoption maturity matters. Many organizations have introduced AI without training, workflow redesign, or incentives, which predictably limits upside regardless of worker capability. Would it be exactly surprising to see this outcome? Not to me.

thought experiment

By stripes • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

So let’s say you work at a company, and they have an OKR “use AI to improve productivity”. If you aren’t familiar with OKRs, they are something that your manager tells you to do, and the more of them you do the more likely you are to get a raise, or bonus, or at least keep your job. Sometimes they are flat out assigned to you, sometimes you get to pick off a list, sometimes you and your manager come up with them together. You manager likely has an OKR handed down to them to get their employees to use more AI, so this isn’t a pure blue sky thought experiment. It is a realistic situation.

So you end up with this OKR. You can ignore it and at the end of performance cycle you can either fess up “I didn’t even try”, or you can say “I gave it a shot and AI didn’t help”, or you can flat out lie “AI helped some”, or “AI helped a lot”. Which do you do? Which do you do if you were also pretty lazy on the other OKRs and really have almost nothing good to report? If you aren’t lazy yourself you already know any OKR with no real way to double check is something you report having achieved because you were too lazy to do any of ‘em.

If you aren’t lazy you have a bunch of OKRs that you actually managed to do (get 90% of TPS reports in on time, screen all your bugs at least twice a week, whatever). You also likely have a few you didn’t, and you have this one here. Maybe you didn’t bother with AI which gives you the chouces up above in “lazy”, or maybe you gave it a shot and it didn’t help, so you can report a failure, but you worked so hard on the other OKRs, do you really want to jeopardize your bonus because you have this AI OKR?

If you are super honest maybe you will report the AI OKR as a bust. Maybe your company actually has a “if you aren’t failing at least 20% of your OKRs you didn’t set high enough expectations” policy, and sure you can pass or fail some number of the unverifiable OKRs as needed to hit that magic success rate…but that is rare, it is far more common for a company to treat OKRs as “more is better!”.

Plus even if you are fundamentally an honest person, I’m sure you used AI once or twice to summarize someone else’s long emails into something shorter and maybe inaccurate, but surly that saved time, right? At least as long as they weren’t too inaccurate! Or maybe you used it to fluff up a short email/report into something longer, even if you then spent just as long double checking that it isn’t now inaccurate as you would have fluffing it up yourself (plus now everyone else ends up with longer emails they use AI to summarize…). Or you write code for a living, and you AI’ed up some code, and that saved you like 10 hours of coding, I mean it cost 45 hours of extra debugging, but you saved 10 hours somewhere, so you can report meeting your OKR without a lie!

If you are asked by someone outside your management chain, and outside your company the honest answer is somewhere between “I didn’t try”, to “it didn’t help”, to “it saved me time in one place, but maybe cost me more in another place”, and occasionally “yeah it was helpful somewhere"

So workers are reporting “yeah, AI makes me more productive” up the management chain because that makes rewards flow back down the management chain. Which makes CEO’s think “this shit works!”, I mean it is exacerbates the problem of upper management job being the kind of thing AI can do anyway, of taking in a ton of data and making choices without understanding what the fuck is really going on anyway, so CEO’s already see AI “working” and they are inclined to believe it, especially when their whole management chain reports it as working…

Summarizing workflows

By nightflameauto • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

My director is extremely excited about how much time AI saves him writing up his weekly summaries to pass up the chain. He can write a single sentence, pass it to the AI to be written up into a big fancy report, the next guy up the chain uses another AI to decipher the big fancy report into a single sentence summary that may, or may not, be vaguely like the original sentence used to prompt the AI that wrote the big fancy report, and both of them are super pumped that they saved so much time. My director saved writing time, his next-up-the-chain saved the time of having to read what my director wrote. They’ve just used a bit more compute to avoid typing and reading things that were, at best, busywork created to make it seem as if they were involved in the process of what happens beneath them. AI can really help with busywork reporting.

I’m guessing neither of them will realize they’re automating away the entire reason their jobs exist.

Verizon Wastes No Time Switching Device Unlock Policy To 365 Days

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from DroidLife:
When the FCC cleared Verizon of its 60-day device unlock policy a week ago, we talked about how the government agency, which is as anti-consumer as it has ever been at the moment, was giving Verizon the power to basically create whatever unlock policy it wanted. We also expected Verizon to make a change to its policies in a hurry and they did not disappoint. Again, the FCC provided them a waiver 7 days ago and they are already starting to update policies.

As of this morning, Verizon has implemented a new device unlock policy across its various prepaid brands and I’d imagine their postpaid policy change is right around the corner. Brands like Visible, Total Wireless, Tracfone, and StraightTalk, all have an updated device unlock policy today that extends to 365 days of paid and active service before they’ll free your phone from the Verizon network. Starting January 20, Verizon says that devices purchased from their prepaid brands will only be unlocked upon request after 365 days and if you meet several requirements […].

What exactly is changing here? Well, if you purchased a device from Verizon’s value brands previously, they would automatically unlock them after 60 days. Now, you have to wait 365 days, request the unlock because it doesn’t happen automatically, and also have active service. […] The FCC mentioned in their waiver that by allowing Verizon to create whatever unlock policy they wanted that this would “benefit consumers.” How does any of this benefit consumers?

I left years ago

By necro81 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
After year-over-year cost increases without any improvement in service (speeds, coverage, etc.), I got sick of Verizon’s BS and jumped ship for an MVNO. My cost for comparable service is now 1/3 of what it had been. My only regret is that I didn’t do it sooner.

I always buy my devices outright and bring them to the carrier, having learned the hard way decades ago that purchasing a device from the carrier is always a bad deal in the long run.

And this is WHY....

By zurkeyon • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
I buy all my devices unlocked from the word go…

Re:Buy full price, then

By Bert64 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Because you “bought the device on credit” rather than “renting the device”, so the device is still yours to do with as you please.
Paying for service and using the phone with the service are two different things. You might want to use the phone with other services as well, especially if you travel.

It’s none of their business what you do with the phone so long as you continue paying off the loan. If you don’t pay off the loan as agreed then that’s a breach of contract and they will chase you for that. The device being locked doesn’t take the place of the contract, it’s just an extra totally pointless burden on the customer.

Canada Proves It Works

By brunes69 • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Canada banned the sale of locked mobile phones in 2017. Since then, every phone sold in the country has been unlocked.

Did financing phones go away and make phones more expensive? No.

Carriers still finance phones, and tie them to plans, it is just decoupled from the device so while you may be paying off the device for 3 years, you can decide to sell it and/or move carriers whenever you want, by paying off the remaining balance.

Re:Buy full price, then

By bugmenot151 • Score: 5, Informative Thread

You are missing some important details here that the original post excludes for some reason. These unlock requirements were imposed on Verizon as part of a deal in 2007 that gave Verizon an exclusive license to use the 700mhz C-Block spectrum nation wide. Previously the 700mhz band was used for the upper section of the TV broadcast spectrum, and parts of it were for free public use and emergency services. Because the 700mhz band has very good range and building penetration capabilities, Verizon agreed to these requirements in order to gain exclusive access to use it. Personally, I don’t think the FCC should have caved to Verzion here, the 60 day mandate was the cost of the advantage that Verizon gained with the C-Block spectrum.

Snap Settles Social media Addiction Lawsuit Ahead of Landmark Trial

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Snap has settled a social media addiction lawsuit just days before trial, while Meta, TikTok, and Alphabet remain defendants and are headed to court. “Terms of the deal were not announced as it was revealed by lawyers at a California Superior Court hearing, after which Snap told the BBC the parties were ‘pleased to have been able to resolve this matter in an amicable manner.’" From the report:
The plaintiff, a 19-year old woman identified by the initials K.G.M., alleged that the algorithmic design of the platforms left her addicted and affected her mental health. In the absence of a settlement with the other parties, the trial is scheduled to go forward against the remaining three defendants, with jury selection due to begin on January 27. Meta boss Mark Zuckerberg is expected to testify, and until Tuesday’s settlement, Snap CEO Evan Spiegel was also set to take the stand.

Snap is still a defendant in other social media addiction cases that have been consolidated in the court. The closely watched cases could challenge a legal theory that social media companies have used to shield themselves. They have long argued that Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 protects them from liability for what third parties post on their platforms. But plaintiffs argue that the platforms are designed in a way that leaves users addicted through choices that affect their algorithms and notifications. The social media companies have said the plaintiffs’ evidence falls short of proving that they are responsible for alleged harms such as depression and eating disorders.

Re:Careful

By martin-boundary • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Social media companies are well known to design their services for maximum engagement. Addiction is a form of maximum engagement. Maybe they shouldn’t do predictably bad things if they don’t want to go to court?

Aurora Watch In Effect As Severe Solar Storm Slams Into Earth

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot
alternative_right shares a report from ScienceAlert:
Thanks to a giant eruption on the Sun and a large opening in its atmosphere, we’re currently experiencing G4 conditions — a severe geomagnetic storm strong enough to disrupt power grids as energy from space weather disturbances drives electric currents through Earth’s magnetic field and the ground. Experts say the storm could even reach G5 levels, the extreme category responsible for the spectacular auroral activity seen in May 2024. In fact, space weather bureaus around the world are forecasting powerful aurora conditions, with some suggesting aurora could be visible at unusually low latitudes, potentially rivaling the reach of 2024’s historic superstorm.
A livestream of the Northern Lights is available on YouTube. The Aurora forecast is available here.

don’t miss this…

By rocket rancher • Score: 3 Thread

oblig XKCD

NOAA says we’ve hit G4 (Severe) geomagnetic storm levels, with a G4 watch still in play, plus an S4 (Severe) radiation storm riding along for the fun parts of physics that don’t care about our weekend plans.

I’ve been lucky enough to catch the aurora a handful of times in my sixty-four years on the planet, mostly back in my Reagan-era Air Force days. The one that branded itself into my brain was San Francisco: sitting in lawn chairs on the roof of my friend Joe’s place in the Marina, six stories up, watching ribbons and waterfall-cascades of light over the Golden Gate like the sky had decided to show off for the bay.

If you’ve never seen an auroral display in it’s full glory, put it on your bucket list…let the universe remind you it has an art department.

Solar Storm Hyperbole

By SlashbotAgent • Score: 3 Thread

Why does the hyperbolic language around solar storms persist?

For the entirety of my lifetime there has been this hyperbolic language about solar storms. They could interrupt communications. They could destroy our satellites, They could induce huge currents on our power lines and destroy the electrical grid. But, nothing of consequence has ever happened. Even the Quebec ‘89 outage - the most significant event routinely attributed to solar storms, that you have never even heard of - was more likely due to poor grid implementation and management than it was to the hyperbolic viciousness of solar storms.

The Earth is protected from the effects of solar storms by the Van Allen belt and the magnetosphere. Solar storms are a non-issue, on Earth. Never were an issue, never will be. They create some mild and temporary radio interference and some cool lighting. Nothing more. So why does the hyperbolic language around solar storms persist?

Live cam is down

By SouthSeb • Score: 3 Thread

The link provided is from a camera that doesn’t work. You can watch it from Iceland here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?…

I keep missing it

By dargaud • Score: 3 Thread
I’ve been to places that have plenty of auroras (Alaska, Antarctica, Scandinavia, NZ, etc…), but either at the wrong time of year, during solar minima, or smack in the center of the auroral circle (where there’s nothing to see).
Is there an email alert I can set up for my location for when they *really* happen (based on nearby webcams), not just when some vague model gives a 10% probability ?