Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Physicists Entangle Quantum Memories Across a Record-Breaking 420 Kilometers
  2. Top Album Releases Linked To Rise In Fatal Crashes
  3. Cursor Launches ‘Origin’ Code Hosting Platform As GitHub Alternative
  4. Comcast Is Turning Millions of Its Routers Into Motion Detectors
  5. Disney, ABC Sue FCC Over Threats to Broadcast Licenses
  6. Memory Prices Climb 500% In 12 Months
  7. You Can Finally Buy a Fairphone In the US
  8. Google Buys All of Spirit Airlines’ Data to Feed Its AI Models
  9. Apple Lowers App Store Fees In Europe to Settle Dispute With EU
  10. Microsoft MVP Creates Site to Remind You of All the Brands Redmond Replaced
  11. India Paves the Way For Charging Merchants a Fee On UPI Transactions
  12. Sainsbury’s Store Pauses Facial Recognition After False Shoplifting Claim
  13. Solar Power and Batteries Have Been Keeping Europe’s Grid Stable
  14. ‘Buy Now, Pay Later’ Lenders Pitch Loans For Needs Like Electricity and Rent
  15. Supreme Court Rejects Verizon Bid For $47 Million Refund of FCC Fine

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Physicists Entangle Quantum Memories Across a Record-Breaking 420 Kilometers

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
alternative_right shares a report from Phys.org:
Optical fibers are already the backbone of global communication systems. Recently, however, physicists have started to explore how their functionality could be boosted further by conveying information via entangled quantum particles — potentially enabling instantaneous exchanges of information across vast distances. Such a system could eventually be the basis of a future ‘quantum internet,’ offering a level of security and computing power beyond anything possible today. In new research published in Physical Review Letters, a team led by Xi-Yu Luo at the University of Science and Technology of China in Hefei has pushed that vision further than ever, entangling two quantum memories across 420 kilometers (261 miles) of optical fiber — more than four times the previous record.

Once again

By T34L • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Entangled quantum particles do not allow for faster than light communication. They allow you to be sure that once you collapse the quantum state on one end, it has been or will be the same one on the other end too. The moment you entagle two states, you know they’re the same (or “matching”, which can also mean opposite depending on the states) without actually measuring either of them (where measuring does require destroying them).

A quantum state is like a scrach lottery ticket. You don’t know if it’s gonna win on lose until you scratch it and essentially invalidate it as a “playable” lottery ticket. Quantum entanglement allows you to “clone” tickets without actually scratching them, but you won’t know if they’re winners or losers, just that they match.

Top Album Releases Linked To Rise In Fatal Crashes

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Guardian:
The release of a new album by Taylor Swift might be a cause for celebration among her fans, but such events have also been linked to a more sombre phenomenon: an increase in fatal car crashes. The team behind a new study say it sheds light on the impact of distracted driving. Writing in the journal Jama Network Open, [Vishal Patel, first author of the study based at Harvard Medical School] and colleagues report how they focused on the release of 10 major albums, launched between 2017 and 2022, selected for having the highest number of Spotify streams over a single day. […] The team found streaming volume for the top 200 songs in the US was 43% higher on the date of major album releases compared with the days surrounding the releases — although such data does not reveal whether the music was being streamed in a car.

[…] The researchers used data from a population-based registry of fatal US motor vehicle crashes to look at the number of traffic fatalities on the dates these albums were released, as well as for the 10 days either side. After taking into account the day of the week upon which the album was released, as well as federal holidays, and time of year, the researchers found the number of US traffic fatalities showed a relative increase of 15.1% on the date of major album releases, compared with similar days either side. “This is equivalent to approximately 182 fatalities in the US attributable to the release days of the 10 included albums,” the team writes.

Patel said the release of a new album could distract drivers because accessing music is a search task, not a single button press. “You unlock the phone, open the app, find the release, read down a tracklist, tap the right song. That’s several seconds of looking at a screen,” he said, adding unfamiliar music also demands more attention, while research has suggested listening to new, high-energy music measurably degrades driving performance. The researchers add the rise in traffic fatalities was greater among certain groups — such as younger drivers, male drivers, people who were driving alone, and people driving cars with a built-in infotainment platform. The authors say the results suggest that “online music streaming through smartphones may significantly contribute to distracted driving and traffic fatalities.”

Organizers

By TwistedGreen • Score: 3 Thread

What do you mean, a search task? I just pop the CD in, and it plays. I mean yeah, sometimes I have to flip through my CD organizer at a stop light, but it doesn’t take more than a few seconds.

Spotify’s UI sucks.

By devious_malcontent • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
Yeah, I’ve had this problem before, But I’m quick to blame Spotify’s UI because it sucks, when a new album releases, I do not care and the last thing I want to see when I’m driving is a pop up for it. (Yes, this has happened to me), I have a single playlist that I play all the time and if a song that’s playing that I don’t like or don’t feel in the mood for I skip it, using the physical buttons on my steering wheel, and not taking my eyes off the road, (not that Spotify’s Shuffle algorithm is any good, it’s absolute dog shit).

And before I leave, I always make sure it’s set to that playlist as I switch to alternative playlists when I’m doing other tasks, and it’s incredibly difficult to try and change playlists while driving, I learned my lesson a long time ago and I just pull over or mute the stereo entirely and sit in silence. (No, I’ve never had an accident before, but I don’t need to, to know that trying to navigate a touch screen while driving is a bad idea, even at very low speeds).

For some stupid reason as well the user interface is different per phone device, my partner hates it on a new whatever the fuck Samsung’s new flip phone is, because the seek bar is a wobbly groove for some stupid reason, and the album art is in the wrong spot and for some stupid reason they keep insisting on changing the interface because product managers have to justify their job....

I usually have it where if I’m driving with my partner, I get her to set the playlist, but she always puts her trash music on.

Google for some stupid reason also decided to give me Gemini so trying to set navigation through voice commands is an impossible task until I changed it back, it’s still not perfect but it’s better than arguing with a clanker.

Most people should not be driving cars

By OrangeTide • Score: 3 Thread

But without decent public transportation or reliable eyes-off autonomous driving, we’re going to continue to waste money and human life on distracted driving.

While I would love to believe that getting the word out with public service announcements to improve the public’s general awareness of the risks of distracted driving, or actively reworking our training and licensing programs. The cynic in me knows in my bones that most people think they are above average drivers, and that people will feel that raising the requirements to get a license is somehow unfair.

Just clicked on this…

By nospam007 • Score: 3 Thread

…for the sarcasm.

And I must say, I’m not disappointed.

Cursor Launches ‘Origin’ Code Hosting Platform As GitHub Alternative

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Cursor has launched Origin, a GitHub-style code hosting platform built directly into its AI coding environment. The company is initially positioning Origin as a low-risk layer on top of GitHub, keeping GitHub as the "source of truth,” but the launch landed just as a major GitHub outage highlighted growing concerns about reliability in the age of AI-generated code. VentureBeat reports:
Cursor began rolling out Origin, its own code hosting platform, to paid users on Monday morning. Roughly three and a half hours later, GitHub’s status page lit up with what became a six-hour-and-forty-two-minute global degradation — error rates near 20% across pull requests, issues and the API, and near 50% on archive and raw file downloads, according to GitHub’s incident log. Enterprise single sign-on went down with it: SAML, OIDC, SCIM provisioning and Team Sync all failed. So did Copilot.

The developer internet did what the developer internet does. “You can now host your repos in Cursor Origin and deploy to Vercel via Cursor Origin which is itself hosted on Vercel,” Vercel chief executive Guillermo Rauch posted on X. “And unlike GitHub, it’s online [smile emoji]" Asked why he was smiling, Rauch replied: “trying to make light of the situation. We ourselves are stuck because of github rn!” Matt Palmer, who works at Cursor, quote-tweeted his own company’s launch with the day’s best line: “We were going to ship this earlier, but GitHub was down.” A GitHub outage, in other words, delayed the launch of a GitHub competitor.

Product launches get locked weeks in advance, and no evidence suggests Cursor timed this one. But the coincidence did the company an enormous favor, because it dramatized the argument Origin exists to make. For eighteen years, choosing where to host your team’s source code has been the least interesting decision an engineering organization makes. Cursor is betting that AI agents have made it interesting again — and for technical decision makers, that is the real news here. Not a new product, but a new procurement question with a governance problem attached.

Don’t think it will work

By abulafia • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
Gitlab spent insane money chasing Github’s lead. As I understand it they do make money now, but only on their enterprise offering, not the SaaS.

And Gitlab actually has nice features; this looks like a weekend project.

Add to that I don’t think your average enterprise is going to be all that hot to rent what’s supposed to be boring infra from the Space Nazi.

Although the fact that Microsoft can’t seem to keep Github operational is starting to leave an opening, so depending on how incompetent they get, maybe there’s an opening there.

How about take that retired Win 10 box .

By drnb • Score: 3 Thread
How about take that retired Win 10 box, download the git documentation, install Linux on the box and setup your own server for your LAN?

Comcast Is Turning Millions of Its Routers Into Motion Detectors

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Comcast is activating Wi-Fi motion sensing on millions of compatible Xfinity gateways, allowing the routers to detect movement by measuring disruptions in signals between the gateway and connected devices. The free feature, part of Xfinity Shield, can send activity alerts through the Xfinity app and offers Home, Away, and nighttime monitoring modes without requiring separate motion sensors. The Verge reports:
Wi-Fi motion sensing is a technology that has been around for a while, but it’s only recently that it’s become accurate and reliable enough to catch on. Linksys launched a similar service in 2021, but discontinued it a few years later. Lighting company Wiz launched a line of Wi-Fi-sensing smart bulbs in 2023, and more recently Philips Hue deployed a similar radio-frequency sensing technology in its products (using Zigbee rather than Wi-Fi). Comcast’s motion sensing pairs with new modes in the Xfinity app — Home Watch, Away Watch, and Dark Watch (a night/sleep mode) — allowing you to turn sensing on or off based on your activities.

Re:user consent

By brunes69 • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Its a paid feature. You don’t get it for free.

We have had access to this in Canada for a long time but it is ridiculously overpriced so I don’t pay for it.

Re:user consent

By rsilvergun • Score: 5, Informative Thread
It’s a paid feature for you to access the data but I would be shocked if they didn’t turn it on without notifying you anywhere except the finest of fine print so that they could sell the data. If all else fails here in America they will want to give the data to the police.

Re:It’s OPT-IN

By rsilvergun • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
It’s 2026 dude. Nobody believes that anymore.

Unless you have laws and they are strictly enforced with extremely harsh penalties companies will do whatever the fuck they want and you have to suck it down. And we stopped passing those kind of laws here in America in the ‘80s when Ronald Reagan took over. The few we had left on the books we stopped and forcing when newt Gingrich started fucking up Congress. And the last of our civil rights got rendered moot when we gave up the courts to a bunch of corrupt fascists.

We are at the final line of defense as far as democracy is concerned. The voters and elections. It is possible because of Trump’s failing Health we might turn that around just barely but it’s pretty touch and go right now.

Comcast TattletaleasaService?

By SomePoorSchmuck • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Is there any legal principle that prevents Comcast from using this to determine the number and size of pets you have, and then selling that data to, say, apartment management companies, HOAs, and municipal code-compliance departments that have restrictions/fines on number/size of pets?

“Find out how we help our partners in large urban markets increase their citation revenues by 19.7%!”
And then Comcast gets 3% of the deposit/fee/citation as profit-sharing, exactly like the red-light camera companies.

Re:user consent

By cruff • Score: 4, Informative Thread
This is why I use my own equipment, Comcast doesn’t get to do things to my WiFi.

Disney, ABC Sue FCC Over Threats to Broadcast Licenses

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Disney and ABC are suing the FCC to block an early review of eight station licenses, arguing the Trump administration is using the agency’s regulatory power to punish the network over programming and editorial decisions it dislikes. Reuters reports:
In a lawsuit (PDF) filed in U.S. District Court in Washington, Disney said the FCC was seeking to coerce and retaliate against “a network that refuses to bow to the administration’s demands,” calling the agency’s actions an “extraordinary assault on free speech.”

Trump has waged an aggressive series of attacks on the news media and the latest move follows a two-year-long battle between Trump and Disney. Last month, Trump again called for ABC stations to lose their licenses because the network refused to air a prime-time speech on elections. The court case will pose a key test of the free speech rights of media outlets. Disney and ABC asked the court (PDF) to quickly issue a temporary restraining order halting the license renewal proceedings and preventing the FCC from scheduling a hearing. The company said the public comment period ended earlier this month and the FCC could act at any time.

The lawsuit alleges that the administration is violating the company’s First Amendment free speech rights, saying that the FCC “is using its regulatory power to retaliate against (Disney and ABC) for programming and editorial decisions the administration dislikes.” The FCC said the move stemmed from a year-long investigation into whether Disney’s diversity policies amounted to unlawful discrimination, an allegation the company denies. U.S. District Judge Loren AliKhan issued an order on Tuesday directing the company and the FCC to propose a schedule for considering the request for a temporary restraining order and told the agency to notify her if it moves to start the process of revoking the ABC licenses.

Once you pay the Dane-geld

By logjon • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
You never get rid of the Dane. Would have been easier for everyone if they had done this from the jump instead of capitulating. We’ve known for centuries that appeasement doesn’t work. We already knew when we tried it with Hitler that it didn’t work. In 1939, there were already poems about how it doesn’t work. But sure. This time was gonna be different. Did it pan out that way? No, it never does. I mean, these people somehow delude themselves into thinking it might, but… but it might work for us.

Projection

By ArchieBunker • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The same people who call everyone else snowflakes and like to shout fuck your feelings actually have the most fragile feelings of all.

Re:Beneficial use of the EM spectrum

By ArchieBunker • Score: 5, Informative Thread

The broadcast networks have a First Amendment right to blather as they will subject to the usual rules against incitement to violence and slander.

Haha oh I can see where this is going

However they are using a public good (the spectrum) and as such they have to show a beneficial use. Spewing non-stop lies over the airwaves is not that use. They seem to have forgotten that. There is no right to the spectrum, they can all got back to print where the rules have always been looser (the Hearst newspapers being a traditional example.)

Can you name one of the “non-stop lies” Jimmy Kimmel (or even ABC for that matter) spewed?

It’s just as well that I live in a broadcast dead zone as least as far as TV goes. It definitely cuts down on the amount of hysteria I have to filter.

So your tv has the Fox News logo burned in? Hell even Fox had to admit in court their programming is entertainment and you’re not supposed to actually believe it. https://law.justia.com/cases/f…

Re:socialist left view

By ArchieBunker • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

You. Are. In. A. Cult.

Re: Trump is about to learn

By newslash.formatblows • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
It’s the same reason he’s such a tough guy with his military threats and actions. He would give 0 shits about invading Iran, nuking it, or whatever else since the deaths of non-Trumps don’t bother him at all, and he’s not spending his own money dropping bombs over there.

Memory Prices Climb 500% In 12 Months

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
RAM prices have exploded over the past year, with some DDR5 kits approaching 500% year-over-year increases and a 128GB kit now selling for $3,399, which is more than 10 times its previous low. Tom’s Hardware reports:
Things improve as you step down the memory capacities and speed tiers, but not as much as we’d like. You’re still looking at $392 for a memory kit that was just $72 last year. To reinforce the point, I pulled the latest average price data from PCPartPicker, comparing where we are today (August 2026) to exactly one year ago. This data is somewhat approximate, but it should be broadly accurate. […] A standard 64GB (2x32GB) DDR5-5600 kit that would have cost you under $200 last summer is now demanding over $1,100. It is a 5x multiplier on a component that used to be a fairly boring and predictable line item in a PC build budget.

If you plan to just wait it out on an older AM4 or LGA1700 motherboard with DDR4, you’d better hope your memory holds out too, because DDR4 isn’t safe from the fallout. With DDR5 entirely out of reach for most builders, the resulting scramble for older platforms running DDR4 memory has created a massive knock-on effect, and as a result, DDR4 kits are up anywhere from 120% to nearly 180% across the board. Nowhere near as bad as DDR5 pricing, but it still stings when a kit that was $105 last year is $281 this year.

This phenomenon is by no means exclusive to the US, either. German tech site ComputerBase have also been tracking this global trend, reporting just this week that average RAM prices in Europe have skyrocketed by 345% compared to September 2025. Their data shows the squeeze is bleeding into other components too, with hard drive and SSD prices both climbing over 125% in that same timeframe. In fact, the situation is so severe that hyperscale buyers have reportedly already locked in almost all of the global DRAM production capacity for 2027, handing over advance deposits to guarantee their supply of precious DRAM, which is now among the highest-value commodities in the world by weight; mainstream DRAM chips are worth over half as much per kilogram as solid gold.

AI doesn’t use desktop hardware including RAM

By couchslug • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Those days are over.

Re:AI doesn’t use desktop hardware including RAM

By Fly Swatter • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
People keep assuming the AI funnel is taking all their ram when the sad fact is that memory manufacturers simply stopped making desktop memory to use the raw materials on purpose built chips for data centers.

Micron shut down their Crucial brand because they knew they would simply not be making anymore of those products.

Re:Thanks, AI bubble!

By karmawarrior • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

No. The hardware being built for AI is basically using hardware that more closely resembles graphic cards minus the DisplayPort output than anything you can pick apart to insert in your PC. Even the memory modules are completely un-DIMM like.

At best, supply will return to pre-AI levels, but that’ll just mean that memory reduces in cost to somewhere between today’s absurd prices and Trump’s post-tariff prices. The chances of it being reduced to Biden levels is pretty low.

Memory is going to be expensive for the foreseeable future. And all because of what’s essentially a con job, an attempt to take over every substantial business in America by making their own employees unable to understand what it is they do, that nobody’s prepared to do anything about.

Re:AI doesn’t use desktop hardware including RAM

By swillden • Score: 5, Informative Thread

People keep assuming the AI funnel is taking all their ram when the sad fact is that memory manufacturers simply stopped making desktop memory to use the raw materials on purpose built chips for data centers.

Not so much the raw materials as the fab space/time, but yes.

We have pretty extensive history of how this goes; there have been a half-dozen DRAM crunches in the last ~40 years. What always happens is that prices explode, manufacturers build out massive new capacity (which takes years, and as fabs have gotten more complex it takes more years), then all the new capacity goes into production at about the same time and RAM prices crater.

And we’re definitely seeing the same processes at work this time. Between Samsung, SK Hynix, TSMC and Micron there’s almost a trillion dollars of new fab construction going on right now. When all of that comes on line, it’s going to provide a massive boost to output… and RAM prices will almost certainly drop precipitously, losing all of the recent gains plus whatever normal decline we’d have expected, plus some more.

When? Probably around 2030. 2029 if we’re lucky, though we might see a little softening by 2028. Definitely not this year and almost certainly not next year.

It could happen faster if the AI bubble bursts before then. I wouldn’t hold my breath.

Re:Thanks, AI bubble!

By Charlotte • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

There is cheap hardware now. There are very few realistic userspace loads that require DDR5. Waiting two more seconds won’t kill you.

You can just buy a 2023-era laptop. It works fine.

You Can Finally Buy a Fairphone In the US

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Wired:
Your iPhone, SamsungGalaxy, andGoogle Pixel have a 1-year warranty. Unless you cough up extra dough for an extended service plan, you’ll pay a hefty fee if you damage the screen and need a replacement (around $329 for an iPhone 17 done directly from Apple). But it doesn’t have to be this way. What if you could order the part from the manufacturer and do the repair yourself? That dream is finally being realized for American consumers, thanks to Fairphone.

The Dutch company is bringing its repairable and sustainably built Android smartphone — the Fairphone (Gen 6+) — to the US. Each one comes with a screwdriver. A replacement screen from Fairphone costs just $90. A new USB-C port is $20. A fresh battery is $40. In all, there are 12 modular elements you can swap yourself. It remains the only smartphone series with a 10/10 repairability scorefrom iFixit, not to mention an unmatched 5-year warranty and software updates through 2033.

The new Fairphone (Gen 6+) is a small upgrade over the Gen 6 that the company launched last year. It has a newer Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 processor and double the RAM at 12 GB, but is otherwise largely the same device (hence the “plus” in the name). It now comes in Cobalt Blue, a nod to the miners who extract the cobalt used to make phone batteries, and the company’s efforts to improve working conditions in mines in the Democratic Republic of Congo. The new Fairphone is available on Amazon and at Fairphone.com for $650, and it’s officially certified to work on T-Mobile and AT&T’s networks.
While this will mark the U.S. debut of its flagship smartphone, the company first entered the stateside market last year with its repairable earbuds and headphones. It also plans to launch its next-generation Fairbuds 2 wireless earbuds later this year.

Thanks

By medusa-v2 • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Nice timing. Yesterday I was looking at de-googled variations of the plain 6 from Murena but the old version didn’t support my carrier. This one will.

Maybe the important detail is that for folks who want to dump google, you can also go that route at https://murena.com/america/sho… : I guess that makes me a shill but I’m just in it out of a general sense that google went traitor back in the day.

Not compatible with all 3 carriers

By Powercntrl • Score: 5, Informative Thread

The Fairphone’s carrier compatibility page lists carrier compatibility as being quite a bit lacking, unless your carrier is T-Mobile postpaid, AT&T postpaid or a T-Mobile MVNO.

I jumped ship from T-Mobile to Visible because of T-Mobile’s recent price increases, and this phone may as well be a brick as far as Verizon’s network is concerned.

Re: Very happy with my Fairphone

By SnotMelon • Score: 4, Informative Thread
Indeed. I’ve had my Fairphone 4 for 3 years now. Still works fine for what I need. Battery is beggining to degrade, but just checked and a replacement from the the official fairphone shop is £25.95, so I’ll probs upgrade that soon. It beats buying a knock-off “genuine” battery from Amazon for 3 times the price.

Re: Not compatible with all 3 carriers

By Powercntrl • Score: 4, Informative Thread

I would like to know if this phone will work in Verizon prepaid because I am in the market for a new phone.

The Fairphone is incompatible with Verizon, per their carrier compatibility page.

Re:Not compatible with all 3 carriers

By Powercntrl • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Why distinguish postpaid from prepaid? If a phone supports post paid should it not also support prepaid?

I’m just going by what they wrote on their carrier compatibility page. One of the other important things to note is that RCS is not supported on AT&T. I’d argue that without RCS, this is effectively a T-Mobile/T-Mobile MVNO only phone. That isn’t exactly a minor feature to be giving up.

Google Buys All of Spirit Airlines’ Data to Feed Its AI Models

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Google has agreed to pay $10 million for a massive trove of anonymized Spirit Airlines data following the carrier’s shutdown, including internal communications, spreadsheets, booking and frequent-flyer records, transactions, and employee information. CNN reports:
Did you ever fly on Spirit Airlines? Or work there? Or send an email to someone who worked there? Then your information will soon be feeding Google’s artificial intelligence model. The discount airline halted all operations in May, and it’s been selling off its remaining assets through the bankruptcy process ever since. While most of that is planes, equipment, and real estate, there’s other things that are valuable, too.

It was disclosed late Monday that the company agreed to sell its data to Google for $10 million. That includes emails and internal communications, spreadsheets, transactions with the public including bookings and frequent flyer information as well as human resources information on its employees. The data has been stripped of anything that would allow individuals to be identified, according to the court filing. But it is still a massive amount of useful intelligence.

Can’t wait for a story about failed anonymization

By flibbidyfloo • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
You know it’s going to happen - someone in charge of replacing/stripping all the names and replacing them with numbers, or whatever, is going to fail at some level. A bunch of PII will go into Gemini, and they won’t be able to sue Spirit, because they won’t exist, and Google will definitely make sure their contract excuses them from any liability.

Re:Can’t wait for a story about failed anonymizati

By Registered Coward v2 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

You know it’s going to happen - someone in charge of replacing/stripping all the names and replacing them with numbers, or whatever, is going to fail at some level. A bunch of PII will go into Gemini, and they won’t be able to sue Spirit, because they won’t exist, and Google will definitely make sure their contract excuses them from any liability.

Even if it would be truly anonymized, once combined with th other vast amounts od data Google has means it is possible to tie the anonymized data to specific, or a plausible group of people.A bad anonymizing process would be a far more likely culprit, but by analyzing patterns, something AI and computers are good at, could yield interesting results.

Re: Now We Know

By Tomahawk • Score: 4, Informative Thread
Google AI tells me “Prior to shutting down on May 2, 2026, Spirit Airlines accumulated roughly 97.5 million customer profiles in its database and about 50.2 million members in its Free Spirit loyalty program”. So my $1 was an overestimate by about 1 order of magnitude. 10c is all you’re worth!

Okay, but

By fropenn • Score: 5, Funny Thread
Knowing Spirit airlines, the data will be delivered six hours late, to the wrong destination, missing its codebook (which somehow got rerouted to Dallas), and the data will be hot, tired, thirsty, and extremely pissed off.

I pity the fool who does business with Spirit.

How to bankrupt an airline

By sziring • Score: 3 Thread

So they are training AI on how to bankrupt a company.

Apple Lowers App Store Fees In Europe to Settle Dispute With EU

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Apple is overhauling its EU App Store fees to settle its Digital Markets Act dispute, simplifying the fee structure and "[resolving] Apple’s disagreements with the Commission over business terms and alternative distribution.” Developers can sign the new terms starting today, and the changes go into effect on October 1. MacRumors reports:
The initial acquisition fee and store services fee are being removed for apps distributed outside of the App Store, and Apple will now charge a 5% Core Technology Commission on digital purchases that replaces the prior per-install Core Technology Fee. Commission rates are changing for App Store apps, alternative payments, and apps distributed through alternative app marketplaces or the web.

Developers can offer in-app purchase options alongside alternative payment options in the EU, which is something Apple did not allow before. Apple says there will be presentation requirements so users have a consistent, transparent experience. Developers distributing apps in the EU must select their payment options and maintain those options for 12 months before making changes to “provide consistency and clarity for users.” Apple will still use a Notarization process for apps downloadable through the web and through alternative app marketplaces.

Apps in the Kids category or being used by children under 13 will not include links to websites to complete transactions. All apps that use alternative payment processing or link to a website for transactions have to include a parental gate if the user is under 18. Apple is relaxing the rules for operating an alternative app marketplace.

And yet

By Bahbus • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Apple still doesn’t offer anything that is deserving of the 5%. They are still double dipping on developers by charging them yearly fees on top of a commission of each sale, while providing nothing but hosting and distribution. The ‘tools’ they provide are nothing special or unique.

Microsoft MVP Creates Site to Remind You of All the Brands Redmond Replaced

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Microsoft MVP Loryan Strant has created the Microsoft Rebrand Registry, cataloging 72 Microsoft products and the 158 names they’ve had over the years. His analysis finds that Microsoft product names survive an average of two years and eleven months. The site even predicts which products are most likely to get renamed next, “by considering the amount of time the current name has applied, prior names, and the frequency with which Microsoft changes names of products in the same family,” reports The Register. “That methodology led him to suggest an ‘elevated’ likelihood of name changes for the Azure App Service, Azure SQL Database, Azure DevOps, and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Field Service.” From the report:
Readers may remember that Strant has also created the site Let Me Correct That For You, which lists the exact names of Microsoft products — an effort he told The Register he thinks is useful because Microsoft in its wisdom uses Camel Case for names like PowerPoint but went with conventional capitalization for Copilot.

Another of his sites immortalizes Microsoft cloud product logos. He’s also created HumbledandHonored.com, a site that generates social media posts MVPs can use to announce they have earned or retained Microsoft’s awards.

Strant told The Register that the Rebrand Registry came about after some banter between himself and other MVPs, during which the topic of Microsoft’s many product name changes came up. He decided to do something about it.

Bob, Rover, Merlin, Clippy, Cortana, Copilot

By xack • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
Same annoying feature that interrupts you, many different names. The algorithm changes, but the anger of its presence remains the same.

Absolutely

By TwistedGreen • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

This is a sign that there are way too many middle-management types whose only contribution can be pointless cosmetic changes.

“Can we get it in cornflower blue?”

Nothing wrong with rebranding.

By Locke2005 • Score: 3 Thread
To Microsoft’s credit, they have done an excellent job of buying good hardware manufacturers. The entire Surface group at Microsoft is built on improving the products of hardware companies Microsoft bought. Ok, XBox was developed in-house, so they didn’t buy all their good hardware from others.

“Microsoft Power Cloud”

By Tablizer • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

that’s where all the products & names are gradually converging, like a giant stench-filled black hole.

India Paves the Way For Charging Merchants a Fee On UPI Transactions

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from the BBC:
For most Indians, paying by Unified Payments Interface (UPI) has become almost absurdly routine. Scan a QR code, tap a few buttons and the money moves instantly. There is no card machine, no cash, and — most importantly — for the user, no visible fee. That may be about to change. India has paved the way for banks and payment companies to charge merchants a fee on UPI transactions, potentially ending a decade-long experiment in free digital payments.

The government has yet to decide the rate or exactly where it will apply, but proposals under discussion include a merchant discount rate (MDR) of 0.3-0.5% — a small fee paid by a business to the banks and payment companies that process its UPI payments — on larger transactions at big businesses. The government says consumers and person-to-person UPI payments will remain free. If merchant fees are introduced, they will apply only to some transactions above a set threshold, at a nominal rate, meaning most UPI payments will remain free. The question is whether putting a price on UPI could weaken the network that made it such a success.

The stakes are enormous. Launched in 2016, UPI has grown into one of the world’s biggest real-time payment networks. According to official data, in July alone, there were 23.6 billion UPI transactions worth 29.87 trillion rupees ($313.5 billion). Fintech apps such as PhonePe and Google Pay account for most UPI payments. In the financial year just ended, the figure was about 241.6 billion transactions — almost 12,000 times the volume in UPI’s first full year. More than 550 million people now use it, and the system is now available in some form for payments in 11 countries outside India.
India’s UPI became ubiquitous partly because it made digital payments almost frictionless for merchants, including small vendors who can accept payments with little more than a QR code. New research suggests that merchant acceptance was “not just a result of UPI growth, but one of its key drivers.”
As RBI governor Sanjay Malhotra put it, “Someone will have to pay the cost.” The challenge will be making UPI sustainable without weakening the merchant network that helped it take off.

Re:Typical.

By TWX • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

It’s fairly simple. If it’s that important as service, use government tax revenue to fund its function. If a hot economy is what they want and this helps the money flow, let the rich who can afford the taxes and benefit the most off of that hot economy pay for the privilege.

US pressure is drivin this more than anything else

By avatar8008 • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Follow the money… UPI has blown VISA and MasterCard into almost oblivion in India. The reason this is happening now is that India is trying to negotiate a trade deal with the US and making UPI less attractive to the public is the only way for VISA and MasterCard to get a look in, so the US trade negotiators are pushing for this.

Re:Typical.

By junglee_iitk • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

It is very clear how to sustainably pay for - India isn’t going bankrupt wiping fees off UPI.

The problem is that free UPI is infinitely better than Visa and Mastercard and Trump doesn’t like it, so he creates problems for the biggest industrialists that fund the current Indian government i.e. Adani, so Modi has to find a way to make Adani happy again.

Something that doesn’t find any mention in the reliable western media.

Re: Typical.

By superposed • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

I think the problem is that the first step is actually “Make an expensive system that’s free to use, that we don’t know how to sustainably pay for.”

I don’t buy it. They’ve made it to massive scale without anyone going bankrupt; clearly no one is paying 0.3% of every transaction ($100 billion/year) to keep the current system afloat. The internet itself is evidence that you can have billions of secure, complex transactions where each party just pays a minimal amount for access to the network and no third party needs to be paid for every transaction (roughly $0.06 for a couple hundred bytes in this case).

This is just banks trying to muscle in on some nice-looking transactions.

Re:Really late in the process of rollout

By PIC16F628 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

If we compare the cost of paper money - the printing, distribution, lockers, security .... Who bears that cost? Why can’t the same approach be applied to digital circulation? As others have pointed out, this feels like appeasing the US in trade negotiations rather than burden of running the infra.

Sainsbury’s Store Pauses Facial Recognition After False Shoplifting Claim

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Bruce66423 shares a report from The Guardian:
Sainsbury’s has paused the use of AI face scanning in one of its stores after a customer was wrongly identified as a shoplifter and ejected from the shop. “I was embarrassed, mortified even, and felt quite humiliated and powerless,” Matt Arnold, 46, said of his ordeal. The comedy promoter was buying supplies in the store in East Dulwich, in south-east London, for a standup event at Dulwich Hamlet football club when, after scanning his items and a Nectar card, he was approached by two managers who told him he could not be served owing to an earlier incident. He was then asked to leave and they tried to escort him from the store.

As he left, he saw an overhead CCTV monitor alert with a red circle surrounding his face. He asked the shop staff to keep his shopping in the trolley so his friend could come and pick up the supplies for the comedy night happening soon next door. “I think they were quite confused by this, understandably, but agreed and my colleague Dave went in to pay for and pick up the shop about five minutes later. There was no pause for thought from the staff, no suggestion that they understood this is not how a shoplifter would behave. Just blindly following the machine’s orders.” Sainsbury’s head office apologised to Arnold the next day and has paused use of its AI-assisted Facewatch technology in the store while an investigation takes place.
Arnold says the facial recognition tech should be paused in all stores. “Anyone could be falsely accused and at some point that will be someone vulnerable, someone with mental health issues like anxiety. It’s inevitable,” said Arnold. “Also, I would worry about the confidence-destroying effect of it happening to a younger person or someone less willing or able to stand up for themselves as I have done.”
A Sainsbury’s spokesperson said: “We have contacted Mr Arnold to apologise for his experience at our Dulwich superstore. The incident was caused by human error, not the facial recognition technology. Customers can be reassured that the Facewatch system has a 99.98% accuracy rate, and every match is reviewed by a trained manager.” A Facewatch spokesperson said their technology was not at fault in this case. “A correct alert was sent to the retailer, but was subsequently subject to human error in the way it was handled in store,” they said.

99.98%

By Rei • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

the Facewatch system has a 99.98% accuracy rate,

So one in every five thousand people who walk into your stores is going to be falsely accused of a crime? Wow, thanks for making abundantly clear that people should NOT shop there…

Re:99.98%

By Mushur • Score: 5, Informative Thread

It really means nothing. What does the 99.98% “accuracy” even refer to? For all we know, it could be the true negative rate (e.g. it correctly detects who is NOT a shoplifter 99.98% of the time).

At minimum, you need a “confusion matrix”, you need False Positive, True Positive, False Negative, True Negative, to have a minimum of information to evaluate any prediction system.

This is a major part of what is killing “AI”

By Cpt_Kirks • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The dumb sonofabitch WOULD NOT back down.

His system had obviously accused the wrong man, but the machine “doesn’t make mistakes”.

The current state of “AI” is primitive and terrible.

They lie, they cheat, they take the easy way out, even if it’s wrong.

People are going to be killed by shitty, fake “AI”.

Re:99.98%

By rsilvergun • Score: 5, Informative Thread
It’s also an outright lie. Ignoring the fact that facial recognition has a hard time with black and brown faces the figure cited is based on laboratory tests in perfect conditions.

Once again I am so tired of being lied to and in such an obvious fashion.

Re:Be an American

By Zurk • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Why is it that every Republitard answer to a problem is grift, corruption and ignoring the rule of law ?

Solar Power and Batteries Have Been Keeping Europe’s Grid Stable

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
AleRunner writes:
“Solar has been doing the ‘heavy lifting’ to help Europe meet its energy needs amid a string of blistering heatwaves,” Euronews tells us. Meanwhile, as Europe’s energy demands rise with the heat, jellyfish have been causing shutdowns and reduced power output at multiple reactors at French nuclear plants, as we already discussed.
Euronews reports:
A new analysis from energy think-tank Ember found that solar output in European countries rose by up to 17 percent on heatwave days in June and July. Researchers say that this helped power the grid as electricity demand increased by as much as a quarter on hot days. Heatwaves often trigger a spike in electricity consumption due to the sudden need for cooling, mainly from energy-intensive air conditioning (A/C) units.

The International Energy Agency (IEA) estimates that space cooling, which is mostly A/C units and fans, consumed around seven percent of the world’s electricity in 2022. Even in countries where A/C ownership is low, countries experience energy demand spikes when scorching temperatures hit. During the early summer heatwaves of 2025, France, for example, recorded an evening electricity peak that was 25 percent above the off-season average due to air conditioning.

Ember’s analysis found that during the late-June heatwave this summer, daily electricity demand rose byup to 28 percent in Italy, 23 percent in Hungary, 14 percent in France and 13 percent in Spain compared with pre-heatwave days. It says as heatwave-driven demand increased, solar was the only major power source to perform “better than usual.” Compared with other days in June and July, average daily solar generation during the heatwaves was 17 percent higher in France and Hungary, five percent higher in Spain and the same in Italy.

A good test

By GeekWithAKnife • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
As it turns out this has been a real world Disaster Recovery test for Europe’s energy supply.

Once production is local via wind, solar etc Europe doesn’t need to worry - from a strictly energy security perspective - if the orange baboon bombs some oil country.

While renewable power is proving itself in practice Trump wants to reshire manufacturing…EXCEPT for energy production it seems as he’s reducing clean energy projects.

Europe must keep diversifying it’s energy supply. Russia turning off gas, US messing up oil etc.

I think the lesson is that Europe is on the right track and it needs to accelerate efforts to reach 100% energy self-reliance.

Things are actually going to get even better

By Casandro • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

What we are seeing now is that more and more households with solar are also installing batteries. About 80% of all grid battery storage is now in private households (at least in Germany)… and that’s just the part we have data from, many households are probably just to lazy to register their batteries.

Those households then will store their self-harvested energy in the batteries, using it, particulary, when dynamic electricity prices are high, thus lowering the demand at times when supply is low.

Commercial battery storage is mostly held back by the government with their pro-fossil agenda, but we’ll likely see more storage at power plants and consumers like office buildings, also stabilizing the grid. In fact there are calls to demand a bit of storage on every big plant, so that they can momentarily (for seconds) feed in more power. This is supposed to emulate the “rotating masses” phenomenon of classical power plants.

Probably the main problem today are right-wing governments (at least in Germany) who, increasingly, want this all to fail, sabotaging it where ever they can.

Re: pay for the environment

By Charlotte • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

They’re getting there, it’s a matter of getting the scale factors right. They already have for solar, EV is fairly new in comparison.

Over here more and more people are getting home batteries, if you already have solar you’d be a fool not to. Plus you help stabilize the grid, so it’s also a matter of civic responsibility. One of the ways they encourage this is by charging for peak power usage: with a battery in place your peak goes down, and your EV car is basically a huge battery 10 times the size of your home battery anyway.

One problem is that EU car manufacturers are still ICE oriented, and so they’re lobbying to slow down EV rollout here. Which is why people are starting to buy Chinese cars, they’re better quality and they’re cheaper.

Another issue is that many Europeans either live in apartment buildings or don’t have parking in front of their houses so they can’t charge off their home grid. Or if they can, they’re limited to something like 6.5 kWh which is a real pain if you have a 100 kW car battery (i.e. 15 hours to charge the car). Changing all that infrastructure to this new reality is a long, expensive journey: communal charging points next the apartment block or in the underground parking, city wide charging point rollouts, updating the local power grid to accommodate speed chargers, etc. Our government recently invested billions in the nuts company that maintains/updates the grids.

Re:pay for the environment

By Charlotte • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

No they’re not. The solar panels and inverters are lasting longer than expected. Mine are still chugging along happily after 12 years, in fact I’ve only heard sporadic stories of failing inverters. Most of my friends just installed the panels and forgot about them. When I get a battery installed I’ll need a new inverter, and I was surprised to learn they’re only half the price by now, so the economics are getting even better.

We’re also being charged for actual peak usage so not having solar+battery increases utility bills, the fact that you can’t earn much by pushing back power onto the grid (what is it again, 6 cents/kWh?, I forget) is not that problematic once you learn to use your solar correctly: use power when your panels are producing or when your battery is charged.

Some people here are disconnecting from the grid entirely. They install lots of solar and a battery, and go and charge the car at work and connect it to the home grid when needed.

Investing in solar has been just about the best investment I ever made from an economic point of view. My overall usage is about 0, so I just pay for using the grid. The fact that you’re also helping society is a nice bonus though.

Re:Woke BS for the masses

By ArchieBunker • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

In many countries, coal plants have been running at full capacity this year to keep up with the energy demand while solar panel owners are treated like unwanted scum.

Name some.

In countries like Holland, they charge you for delivering energy back to the net during sunny hours as a new business model.
And fake TikTok politicians like Rob Jetten, who is pushing for this green energy transition, isn’t even bothered by this.
News like this isn’t underpinned by any evidence, just only wishful thinking from some EU bureaucrats.

I’m not going to take anyone seriously who claims to know EU politics and throws around the word “woke”.

‘Buy Now, Pay Later’ Lenders Pitch Loans For Needs Like Electricity and Rent

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from The New York Times:
Buy now, pay later” loans took off during the pandemic as a way for online shoppers to go on retail splurges without using a credit card. Now, lenders are offering the loans as a means for people to finance basic households needs. The lending apps Flex and Zip allow customers to take out loans to pay for their broadband, electricity, health insurance, mobile phone service, mortgage and water bills. Affirm, one of the most popular pay-later apps, has started providing some tenants loans to extend their monthly rent payment for a few weeks. Many dentists, veterinarians and medical clinics now often offer instant pay-later financing, and Intuit this year started promoting “File Now, Pay Later” loans to TurboTax users who owe money in their tax return.

Pay-later loans are becoming the “working capital for the modern middle class,” said Karen Webster, the chief executive of Pymnts, a news and market research company for the payments industry. “Consumers are using it more for essential, everyday things.” Americans spent $160 billion last year through pay-later loans, according to research released recently by Federal Reserve economists — nearly twice what consumers spent two years earlier, in 2023. That’s still a fraction of the more than $3 trillion U.S. shoppers spend annually on consumer credit cards. But the industry continues to expand by double-digit rates each year.

How much of that growth reflects consumer preferences, versus desperation, is a question economists and industry analysts are trying to unravel. The rise in pay-later financing comes as many households are leaning more on debt to keep up with their daily expenses. Paying interest — to afford basic needs — adds to the overall cost of living, which has already been rising amid higher medical, housing and fuel costs. For many borrowers, the loans have become their only option: Half of those using them said they could not make ends meet otherwise, according to the latest edition of a survey that LendingTree, a loan marketplace, has compiled for years.

Re:Welcome to The Future!

By fahrbot-bot • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

I’ll be the first to say it: You will own nothing and you will be happy.

It’s all the “winning” - driving this K-shaped economy. Brought to you by … well, you know who.

Even for food

By anoncoward69 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Apps like door dash offer BNPL options and i believe some restaurant apps directly offer it as well. When you need to make installment payments on your Big Max Meal maybe its’ time to step back and evaluate your finances and choices.

Re:vote Democratic Socialist in the primaries

By drinkypoo • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Since WWII there have been an informal agreement: USA becomes world policeman to keep an order and prevent large conflicts and everyone in civilized world pays the bill. And they do at the expense of their economy, like Japan.

Yeah, that was stupid. You see how that was stupid, right?

If USA stops being the policeman of the world, we will soon have WWIII

This is just stupid. We’ve never been closer to nuclear war than we are now, and it’s Team America World Police that brought us to this pass. Having America be the only threat containing Russia just meant that Russia was free to have a spasm once they got influence over our government.

Re: Welcome to The Future!

By ArchieBunker • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Food and utility prices are outpacing wages and it’s due to pure greed. I mean look at the chart in regards to groceries. https://fred.stlouisfed.org/se…

Next step

By clovis • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The next step is for the lenders to bundle the small loans into securities to sell to investors. They’ll say the securities will be safe because they’ll be protected with credit default swaps, CDS, that will be sold on the open market. They will get AAA ratings.
Next, you’ll be able to trade naked CDS and securitized bundles of CDS guaranteed by investment houses and major insurance companies. This market will be holding trillions of dollars of putative value.

Then a bomb will go off in the lobby of one of the investment houses, perhaps figuratively, and that company will collapse. The CDS will all be called and the trillions will evaporate, and by that I mean anyone who is not a too-big-to-fail entity will lose their shirts. Also, they’ll lose their houses.
The treasury will prop up the too-big-fail-entities and, oh, btw, the investments of the political leadership, and by that I do not necessarily mean the elected leadership.

Supreme Court Rejects Verizon Bid For $47 Million Refund of FCC Fine

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica:
The Supreme Court today rejected Verizon’s attempt to get a $47 million refund from the Federal Communications Commission. In a list of orders (PDF) issued by the court, Verizon’s petition was denied without explanation. The denial apparently ends any possibility of Verizon asking a lower court to review the fine and order the FCC to issue a refund. However, AT&T and T-Mobile are continuing to challenge similar fines on grounds that selling device-location data did not violate US telecom law.

AT&T, T-Mobile, and Verizon were fined a total of $196 million in 2024 for selling mobile users’ real-time location data without their customers’ consent. The carriers sold device-location information to data aggregators, who resold it to other firms. The carriers paid the fines and sought to have them overturned in courts, claiming their Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial was violated. Challenges by AT&T and Verizon were combined into a single case, and the Supreme Court ruled against the carriers in June of this year.

The court ruled that the FCC penalty process does not violate the Seventh Amendment because the carriers could have obtained jury trials if they refused to pay the fines and waited for the government to try to collect. The ruling (PDF) against the carriers was 8-1, with Justice Clarence Thomas dissenting.

Too bad…

By jenningsthecat • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Too bad, that is, that the fine wasn’t two or three orders of magnitude higher.

At the very least, such fines need to represent a serious hit to the bottom line, and an end to the careers of the people responsible for the unlawful activity. More realistically, the fines should come uncomfortably close to being existential threats.

The broligarchs need to understand that while they may run their companies, they don’t run the whole damned society. They need to be treated as the grifting mob bosses that they truly are.

Good

By SlashbotAgent • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Good, they deserve pain.

Unfortunately, we’ll probably be the ones footing the bill in terms of higher charges.

Re:Good

By Tony Isaac • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The pain of $47 million is about as severe to Verizon as a pin prick. Kind of the cost of doing business.

Re:As if it weren’t more obvious

By SomePoorSchmuck • Score: 4 Thread

After you read the entire ruling - including the full text of his dissent - which parts of his reasoning do you believe to be insincere, or which prior precedents do you believe he applied inaccurately?