Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Tech CEOs Are Apparently Suffering From AI Psychosis
  2. Dropbox CEO Drew Houston To Step Down After 19 Years
  3. Company Behind School Bus AI Cameras Wants To Share Footage With Police
  4. Starlink and Amazon May Be Able To Buy Into EU Mobile Satellite Spectrum Plan
  5. American Airlines Picks Starlink For In-Flight Wi-Fi
  6. A Fundamental Principle of Aeronautical Engineering Has Been Overturned
  7. Windows’ Classic 3D Space Cadet Pinball Is Getting a Physical Re-Creation
  8. Internet Starts Coming Back In Iran After Months-Long Blackout
  9. Mythos Detected 23,000 Vulnerabilities Across 1,000 OSS Projects
  10. Spain Blocks Polymarket and Kalshi
  11. Uber, Lyft Drivers In Massachusetts Form First US Ride-Share Union
  12. Netherlands Blocks US Takeover of Vital Digital Supplier
  13. Nvidia Retires Its GeForce Control Panel App After 20 Years
  14. California Moves To Exempt Linux From Upcoming Age-Verification Law
  15. Pope Leo Warns of Risks From AI In 42,300-Word Encyclical

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Tech CEOs Are Apparently Suffering From AI Psychosis

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from TechCrunch:
There is a certain wildness in the tech industry these days that both mimics previous eras of large changes, like cloud computing (runaway costs in the early days), and is like nothing we’ve ever seen before (record revenues accompanied by mass layoffs). One possible explanation: tech executives, especially CEOs, are collectively suffering from delusions of AI grandeur. And at least one tech CEO has said as much out loud: Box founder Aaron Levie.

“CEOs are uniquely prone to AI psychosis because they’re sufficiently distant from the last mile of work that still has to happen to generate most value with AI,” Levie wrote on X. CEOs “play with AI,” develop a prototype, or generate a contract, to use Levie’s examples, and then make the leap to believing agents can do the work. But these top-level executives aren’t the people who have to review code, discover bugs, and identify calls to hallucinated libraries before software is deployed. They aren’t responsible for training AI models on a company’s idiosyncratic contract terms, nor do they have to spend days combing through contracts to find sneaky terms, as Levie indicates.

In other words, Levie’s theory posits, CEOs don’t really understand processes well enough to know what really can and can’t be automated. But that lack of knowledge doesn’t stop them from acting on their beliefs. […] So what are CEOs to do instead? Levie advises CEOs to use AI “a ton” to really see what it can and can’t do, “and come out the other side with an appreciation for both the upside and the real work.”

Dropbox CEO Drew Houston To Step Down After 19 Years

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Dropbox founder Drew Houston is stepping down as CEO after 19 years and will become executive chairman, with product chief Ashraf Alkarmi set to take over after a co-CEO transition period. CNBC reports:
Drew Houston founded Dropbox nearly two decades ago at age 24, eventually becoming a household name in Silicon Valley and the first tech entrepreneur to take a company from the Y Combinator incubator program all the way to the public market. Now, at 43, Houston is ready to do something else. […]

By almost any measure, Houston has had a great run at Dropbox, helping pioneer the cloud storage market, competing head-to-head with Google and Apple and building a net worth of more than $2 billion, thanks to substantial ownership in his company. But in the land of outsized expectations, Houston has overseen a company that peaked too soon and never became a generation-defining brand.

Dropbox’s current market cap of just over $6 billion is down by half from the high price on its first day of trading in 2018, and is below the $10 billion valuation it was ascribed by private market investors in 2014. […] In its latest quarterly earnings report, Dropbox said it has more than 18 million paying users, and the service remains popular with media professionals, graphic designers, architects, and others who share files and photos as part of their daily work.
“Part of me has always thought, oh yeah, I’ll be the CEO of Dropbox until my last gasp of my career,” he said. “There’s never a perfect time, there was no part of me where I was like, ‘oh, this date is the date where it’s going to happen.’"
Since Alkarmi joined Dropbox from Vimeo in late 2024, the company has “become a lot more responsive to our customers and is taking bigger swings on innovation,” Houston said. “I trust the right leader,” he said. “The company’s in the right place.”

He drew what?

By Baby Duck • Score: 4, Funny Thread
Had to read that headline too many times to stop visualizing a CEO drawing the city of Houston.

Dropbox is a plague

By cpurdy • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
I have no idea why anyone likes Dropbox. It is terribly invasive to one’s operating environment, with very little to show for that invasiveness other than slow-downs, crashes, weird error messages, and (one can assume) security issues. The pricing for such a basic service was always a complete non-starter for anyone who knew anything about computers. And as a company/service/product, it made an immediate beeline for the enshitification awards.

It does seem like something that Y Combinator incubator would produce, which is a pretty big insult in my world.

Company Behind School Bus AI Cameras Wants To Share Footage With Police

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
joshuark writes:
BusPatrol, a company that has installed AI-powered cameras in tens of thousands of school buses around the U.S., now plans to turn those cameras into automatic license plate readers (ALPRs), capturing the location of every vehicle the buses drive past, and give that data to law enforcement, 404 Media has learned. BusPatrol has already taken steps to share the collected data with law enforcement contracting giant Axon, according to leaked BusPatrol documents and a source with knowledge of the plans. BusPatrol has acknowledged how controversial its plan to collect and share this data is, pointing specifically to concerns about ICE using license plate data, but emphasizes the likely success of selling the angle of protecting children.

“Who would have thought that school buses would be turned into the mass surveillance state?,” Michael Soyfer, an attorney from the Institute for Justice, which has various ongoing ALPR-related lawsuits The Institute for Justice argues that warrantless use of ALPR systems is unconstitutional, describing similar systems as a “dragnet.” Kate Spree, senior manager of brand communications at BusPatrol, said in an email “This inquiry is based on a false premise and inaccurate information. BusPatrol does not pool or sell data across communities; student safety program data is used only to support the BusPatrol program in the community where that data was created.” When 404 Media asked clarifying questions and said that the reporting is based on leaked BusPatrol material, Spree stopped replying to text messages and emails. This plan gives new meaning to the animated cartoon series "The Magic School Bus"…
Further reading: FBI Wants to Buy Nationwide Access to License Plate Readers

There are no words

By jenningsthecat • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

The phrase “dystopian hellscape” comes immediately to mind. This is just so fundamentally fucked up that it’s hard to say much beyond that.

Can off-the-rack clothing which contains cameras and cell modems be far behind? Sure, that sounds like an impossible stretch, at least practically and technologically speaking. But wouldn’t many of the dystopian developments we live with now be seen as unthinkable or outright impossible a decade or two ago?

On the bright side, at least we’ll have sufficient data centres on line to process all that footage from all those cameras, along with AI to parse the images so humans will be spared the effort. /sarc

Re:What is it with surveillance?

By machineghost • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Look, I’m no fan of mass surveillance, but “Were the police unable to do their jobs before the Internet?” seems like a mind-numbingly stupid way to think about it.

Crimes go unsolved every day! Serious crimes, like rape, child abuse, torture, or murder. And with crimes like that, you don’t want the perpetrator running around free and able to continue committing crimes!

So yes, people have a very good reason to want to make the police more successful, and no that is not a bad thing! It still doesn’t make mass surveillance the right answer … but please, lets not turn our brains off, and ignore the real and serious issues people are (misguidedly) trying to solve here.

It’s not the government

By rsilvergun • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
That’s your mistake. You’re directing your anger at the government. This isn’t coming from the government this is coming from a handful of psychopathic billionaires.

Noticed that all of this surveillance is being owned and operated by private companies. While you’re crazy uncle is having a conniption fit about ethics in games journalism and trans girls in sports (or violent video games and satanic music if you’re old) Peter thiel and Planitir have been lobbying local and state governments to create a corporate surveillance state.

This is what happens when you let a handful of people have too much power. Billionaires are not compatible with your freedom. But the only way to control and limit that power is to take their money away and redistribute and that thar be the socialisms.

Basically it feels unfair to take somebody’s money away and it makes you think that the next step is that somebody’s going to take your money away. Also people like the idea of there being somebody in charge and they like to imagine they can be a billionaire someday themselves and if we stop letting people do that all that imagination goes away.

None of that makes sense when you think about it but this isn’t about making sense this is about vibes. And taking away billionaires money so that they cannot use it to control your life has a bad vibe and I don’t know how to deal with that. It’s easy to say billionaires bad but when it comes time to actually do the thing and take their money that falls apart fast. Just like how there were dirt poor monarchists back in the day. Hell a lot of people in the UK support the monarchy there and it’s still extremely controversial to suggest shutting it down and taking their land and making it public.

Re:What is it with surveillance?

By 0123456 • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

They’re terrified of people doing unauthorized things. So they must spy on us all the time to ensure we don’t.

Weak people have a desperate desire to control others, and Western governments have never been run by such weak people before.

Re:It’s not the government

By PPH • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Noticed that all of this surveillance is being owned and operated by private companies.

Private companies don’t do things without a return on investment. These “psychopathic billionaires” found a business opportunity following defund the police movements. Instead of cops hiding behind every billboard, your town can now pay to have some cameras mounted*. Which cost a lot less.

*Far cheaper than cities DIY the surveillance systems. But if you want to see a really distopian world, ban federal law enforcement from accessing these local systems. And then watch them install their own. Or rather, expand the program of installing them. They are already up in a few select locations.

Starlink and Amazon May Be Able To Buy Into EU Mobile Satellite Spectrum Plan

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Reuters:
Elon Musk’s Starlink and Amazon’s low-earth-orbit satellite business may be able to acquire some European mobile satellite spectrum next year, two people with direct knowledge of the matter said on Tuesday. But they said two-thirds of the satellite spectrum that allows mobile devices and vehicles to communicate seamlessly even in remote locations, would be reserved for European companies.

U.S. companies Viasat and EchoStar hold licenses that are due to expire in May 2027 and the European Commission has been considering how to allocate future spectrum at the same time as the bloc pushes to reduce reliance on U.S. tech. The European Union’s IRIS2 multi-orbit array of 290 satellites, a response to Starlink, will be among the European companies to receive some spectrum, the sources said. British and Norwegian companies can also bid for a license, the people said. Details of the proposal, set to be announced on Wednesday, could still change at a meeting of commissioners on the day, one of the sources.
Commission spokesman Thomas Regnier said EU-wide satellite connectivity was “synonymous with resilience, security, and capability” given the current geopolitical context.
“Satellite connectivity is a key piece of our technological sovereignty, our security, and our defense, as also highlighted by IRIS2,” he added.

Not a chance

By rsilvergun • Score: 3 Thread
One of the Nordic companies just stopped in American company from buying into their tech sector. Europe no longer trusts America enough to let them buy into things like this. Their governments will just block it.

Elon Musk was already a national security risk when he interfered with the Ukraine war. Remember Europe needs Ukraine to be independent and beholden to the rest of Europe because they need Ukraine’s grain because climate change is fucking shit up no matter what your asshole crazy uncle says.

So I predict this will go fucking nowhere no matter how big the bribes are. And the bribes will be very large. But we are starting to get to the point where the failing empire that is America is going to have to start doing expansionism in order to loot other countries and fill its coffers just like every other failing empire. And that will start with Canada and South America but it will eventually have to include the rest of the world because that’s just how failing empires work. Europe is going to start getting ready for that.

American Airlines Picks Starlink For In-Flight Wi-Fi

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
American Airlines plans to install SpaceX’s Starlink Wi-Fi on more than 500 narrow-body Airbus aircraft starting early next year. It does not, however, have any immediate plans to change providers on its Boeing fleet, which currently uses a mix of Viasat and Panasonic. CNBC reports:
American in January rolled out free in-flight Wi-Fi for members of its frequent flyer program, following United Airlines, Delta Air Lines and others. Delta in March said it would use Amazon Leo for in-flight Wi-Fi for hundreds of jets starting in 2028. United, Southwest Airlines and Alaska Airlines, which merged with Hawaiian Airlines in 2024, have selected Starlink.
The move is a big win for SpaceX as it prepares for a potentially massive IPO next month. SpaceX said Starlink and its connectivity business generated $11.39 billion in revenue last year, accounting for 61% of the company’s total sales.

AA.. We’re like Homelander

By sinkskinkshrieks • Score: 3 Thread
Only with more Roman Salutes and patriotic graphics than either Fox News or the late Colbert Report.

As opposed to?

By thegarbz • Score: 3 Thread

Is there actually another player in this space which can provide these services (broadband, low latency, high speed - in the physical sense of the customer moving at >900km/h)?

Re:As opposed to?

By Luthair • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
Don’t let your logic get in the way of a slashvertisment for spacex ahead of its IPO. You’ll make the elongelicals cry.

Re:AA.. We’re like Homelander

By ArchieBunker • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

A shame we can’t deport this illegal immigrant https://www.theguardian.com/te…

A Fundamental Principle of Aeronautical Engineering Has Been Overturned

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Wired:
Aerodynamic drag is a major “barrier” in high-speed airplanes, automobiles, and bullet trains. This is because a design with less aerodynamic drag allows the aircraft to move at higher speeds with less energy. When an aircraft or car body moves at high speed, a thin layer of air called the "boundary layer" is formed on its surface. This boundary layer has two states: laminar flow, in which air flows in an orderly fashion, and turbulent flow, which involves turbulence. The longer the air stays in the laminar flow state with low friction, the smaller the air resistance becomes, but as the air speed increases, it transitions to turbulent flow. The key to reducing aerodynamic drag is how to delay this transition to turbulence.

For more than 80 years, the principle of “the surface of an object must be smooth” has been the basic premise of aeronautical engineering throughout the world in order to suppress the transition to turbulence and reduce aerodynamic drag. This premise was based on the results of a 1940 study by Ichiro Tani, a Japanese aerodynamicist who quantitatively demonstrated the relationship between “surface roughness” (an indicator of the state of the machined surface) and turbulent transition, arguing that surface roughness, which was unavoidable with the manufacturing technology of the time, prevented laminar flow from being realized. However, in 1989 Tani reinterpreted the experimental data on rough-surface pipes obtained by fluid engineer Johann Nikulase in the 1930s, bringing a new perspective that “roughness may not necessarily only promote turbulent transition and increase fluid resistance.” Inheriting this idea, a research group led by Yasuaki Kohama of Tohoku University experimentally demonstrated in the 1990s that fibrous rough surfaces, which have fine fibrous irregularities on their surface, have the effect of delaying transition under certain conditions.

The same Tohoku University research team recently announced a discovery that significantly advances this trend. Aiko Yakino, associate professor at Tohoku University’s Institute of Fluid Science, and her research group were the first in the world to demonstrate that aerodynamic drag can be reduced by up to 43.6 percent simply by applying distributed micro-roughness (DMR), a surface roughness so fine and irregular that it cannot be distinguished by the naked eye. This technology is fundamentally different from the “rivulet (shark skin) process,” which is known as a typical aerodynamic drag reduction technology. The rivulet process mimics the fine longitudinal grooves in shark skin, and by carving grooves approximately 0.1 mm wide along the direction of airflow, it aligns the vortices that occur near the wall surface of turbulent airflow areas. DMR, on the other hand, delays the switch from laminar to turbulent flow by means of random and minute irregularities. The flow zones it affects and the mechanisms it employs are based on completely different concepts.

Woah, cool

By T34L • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

It’s not that surprising that someone found another exception to the the rule of thumb that’s been proven wrong with many mechanisms at many scales, including the shark skin, but also just, golf ball dimples, and all kinda wacky methods on aircraft wing like shock bodies and all…

…I’m more impressed they now got air friction tunnels that levitate the object magnetically a meter out, against the air friction, while also being able to actually measure the drag on it at that. That’s really, really cool and oughta open up aerodynamics to lot of experiments that’d be very difficult to pull off without compromising accuracy or something else.

Hence it was not a “fundamental” principle

By gweihir • Score: 5, Informative Thread

It was a generally accepted principle. Please stop with the abuse of language to make things sound more flashy. It just makes you look dumb.

Re:Mythbusters?

By T34L • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

The article even mentions that there’s other surface irregularities that decrease friction, and the paper mentions other methods that also decrease drag, but the newly observed effect is distinct and different with the ones we’ve seen so far, and the headline is reductionist and bad.

Re:shark skin

By Rei • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

I think the only reading comprehension difficulty here is on your side. The impacts of “roughness” as a general term is a fundamental aspect of aerodynamic engineering. There has been evidence steadily emerging over time that this isn’t exactly correct, that the distribution of roughness matters greatly, and the right distribution can even surpass a smooth surface. The confirmation in this paper helps close the chapter on this.

And honestly, their two approaches doesn’t sound that difficult to manufacture at all. Certainly much easier than riblets. And the side effect of the first one - surface glass beads - would actually be beneficial for RAM. One of the principles for radar absorption is that you want a steady transition of the impedence (and by relation, dielectric constant) from the surface (which you want to be as much like air as possible) to the deeper layers. The outermost layer of RAM is commonly something like PTFE full of hollow glass beads. Under that you may have pure PTFE, and under a polymer with like 5% chopped carbon fibre fill, and so on. Well, here it turns out that having tiny glass beads on the surface can improve your drag coefficient as well.

Re:Mythbusters?

By Rei • Score: 5, Informative Thread

The dimples on golf balls are actually to create turbulent flow. TL/DR, a sphere isn’t a very aerodynamic shape; its rear taper is too sharp, so flow detaches and there’s a big low pressure wake in the back. High pressure in the front and low pressure in the rear = pressure differential, and a large area times the pressure differential = large drag force.

While it’s best to not have flow separation, or at least delay it as long as possible, if you’re going to have flow separation, you commonly want to generate vortices at the point of flow separation. That’s why cars commonly abruptly truncate (kammback) where they’d become too steep in the rear rather than continuing to curve, and often have various vortex generating surfaces (lips, radial protrusions, etc) at the termination; it causes air to “pull down” and help fill in the wake. This is what the dimples on golf balls do.

Now, most of the dimples on a golf ball at any time are actually doing harm, or at least not helping. You really only want the dimples right around the point of flow separation. Unfortunately, golf balls don’t have a specific flight orientation, so it’s all or nothing - and “all” happens to be the better choice.

But as mentioned, this is entirely different than what is being talked about here, which is about the laminar-turbulent flow transition.

Windows’ Classic 3D Space Cadet Pinball Is Getting a Physical Re-Creation

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Hobbyist CNCDan is trying to build a real-world version of Windows’ classic 3D Pinball for Windows — Space Cadet, using 3D-printed flippers, bumpers, LEDs, slingshots, and a raised playfield modeled after the original virtual table. But in bringing the digital table into the real world, CNCDan has already run into several physical challenges the software never had to contend with… Ars Technica reports:
After scaling and skewing the on-screen, perspective-shifted view of the Space Cadet playfield onto a 1-meter-tall table, he ended up with a rectangular playfield just 56 cm wide. That’s on the smaller side for commercial pinball tables and maps to playfield bumpers that are just 53 mm wide — way smaller than any prebuilt bumpers that are commercially available.

Once CNCDan dealt with issues with unreliable plastic microswitches for those tiny bumpers (Hall effect magnets seemed to help), he ran into a separate problem with the even smaller bumpers on the raised playfield. The wiring for those bumpers had to be arranged very carefully to avoid blocking a kickback return alley underneath, a positioning problem that the original designers of the virtual table didn’t have to consider at all. CNCDan also ended up adding a physical mechanism to simulate the short delay 3D Space Cadet players may remember, when the ball dropped down a hole from the raised playfield back to the flippers below.

CNCDan says he’s currently looking for artists to help him with a hand-drawn re-creation of the original Space Cadet playfield, which he doesn’t want to use AI for. “I’m sure [AI] can do it, but I’d much rather give this job to a real human being,” he said in the video.

Re:Pinball machines are still made

By redback • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

because the objective is to build something, not to simply have it.

Re:Why not scale it up?

By redback • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Watch the video. Even at quite a large scale some of the stuff is still too small for off the shelf parts.

Hard to get the look right

By HalAtWork • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Trying to get the real table to update the ball at 20fps is proving insanely difficult.

Re:Pinball machines are still made

By MDMurphy • Score: 4 Thread
I can understand wanting to build it yourself, but reinventing the wheel for bumpers, rollovers, and other standard pinball parts seems a bit too far, especially if you want to it work like the original game. Those 3D printed parts looked rough and will take a lot of fiddling to get them to work as smoothly and reliably as an off the shelf part.

Live Action sucks

By Bu11etmagnet • Score: 3 Thread

Live-action recreations usually suck.

Internet Starts Coming Back In Iran After Months-Long Blackout

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from the BBC:
Internet access has started to be restored in Iran after being cut off almost three months ago, the country’s first vice-president has said. “The first step toward free and regulated access to cyberspace has been taken,” Mohammad Reza Aref wrote on X on Tuesday. Internet monitoring groups Netblocks and Kentik reported “partial” restoration around 13:00 GMT, though the latter warned most networks were still down.

The Iranian government cut internet access following the launch of US and Israeli attacks on February 28. Officials suggested the aim was to prevent surveillance, espionage and cyber-attacks. It is one of the longest-running national internet shutdowns ever recorded worldwide. A content creator from Tehran told the BBC that he had been able to connect to the internet using his home WiFi on Tuesday. “The main point is, some of my income will come back,” he said.

Netblocks said it was unclear whether the internet return would be sustained, and told the BBC it was consistent with what it had seen when previous blackouts were lifted — where restoration could take hours. “Access is not universally back to its original state, with some regional variation,” said the global internet tracker’s research director Isik Mater on Tuesday. She added that there were signs of “more extensive filtering” than prior to January — when a similar blackout was imposed during the regime’s deadly crackdown on anti-government protests — “including additional restrictions to messaging apps like WhatsApp.”

Iran internet shutdown to quiet their own people

By SmaryJerry • Score: 5, Informative Thread
Iran shutdown the internet for almost the entirety of January, well before the US started dropping bombs. Iran’s people were holding massive protests against Iran’s government which followed with the government’s mass indiscriminate killing of protesters and their family members, including notably their Olympic wrestling team athlete. Iran’s claim that they shut down the internet due to US hacking is an outright lie, they simply did not want Iranian protesters to support to the US’s position. The women’s national football team were granted asylum in Australia but were forced to return to Iran under threat of their families being killed as well. With the cutting off of the internet the videos of killings, dead bodies, and those begging and pleading with the US to intervene stopped coming out. We will see how much Iran has beaten down their people and if any resistance still remains with the internet now slowly being restored.

Misinformation

By physicsphairy • Score: 5, Informative Thread

The Iranian government cut internet access following the launch of US and Israeli attacks on February 28. Officials suggested the aim was to prevent surveillance, espionage and cyber-attacks.

This is tantamount to misinformation. The regime cut the Internet on January 8th. It was *never* turned back on for the general public. Iran started allowing some country-wide intranet only, with heavy censorship and *no* outbound communication (except for regime figures). There has been no way to communicate with people in Iran anytime since except (a) Starlink (illegal, extremely risky, and subject to jamming) (b) outbound telephone calls (monitored).

Because it started January 8th, it is clear the initial purpose is very different than this states. The protests themselves started in late December. The internet blackout corresponds with nothing else but the regime crackdown in which they murdered tens of thousands of Iranian civilians. The obvious main purpose has been to keep Iranians from sharing about the atrocities.

Is the war related? Of course. It has become only more important as Iran has sought to seize a diplomatic high-ground (or at least equivalency) to maintain full narrative control. And it is true there is an intelligence aspect as well, but more than cyber attacks (how is downing your *own* Internet a win there?) the concern is likely that the Iranian people have been happy to share information to help target the regime, as they did during the previous 12 Day War.

It is malpractice to quote “officials” - if those are indeed “Iranian officials” - and then offer their uncontested view, when they are the ones who blacked out the Internet specifically to be able to offer an uncontested view.

Re:Uptick in bot activity

By ArchieBunker • Score: 4, Funny Thread

I noticed an uptick on mongodb ads that take up acres of screen real estate.

Re:Thanks to Trump

By ArchieBunker • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Trump gave them nukes by tearing up the JCPOA agreement in 2018. https://trumpwhitehouse.archiv…

Re:Thanks to Trump

By thegarbz • Score: 4, Informative Thread

We need an actual deal to stop Iran from getting nukes at all. What is your plan for that?

Build a time machine, go back in time and assassinate trump before his first term as president?

Mythos Detected 23,000 Vulnerabilities Across 1,000 OSS Projects

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
wiredmikey shares a report from SecurityWeek:
Anthropic says its Claude Mythos model discovered thousands of severe vulnerabilities across more than 1,000 open source software (OSS) projects. According to the AI giant, Mythos Preview has identified more than 23,000 potential vulnerabilities. Of these, 1,900 have been reviewed by external security firms, and 1,726 have been confirmed, including over 1,000 rated “high” or “critical” severity.

The findings are still being reviewed, and Anthropic estimates that nearly 3,900 critical and high-severity vulnerabilities will be confirmed based only on current findings. As the scans are ongoing, the company believes the number of severe vulnerabilities may reach 6,200. Anthropic says more than 1,100 unverified findings have been reported to vendors, and 75 issues with a critical or high severity rating have been patched. Vendors have published 65 security advisories.
“The number of patches is still relatively low for three reasons. First, we’re still early in the 90-day window that’s set out in our Coordinated Vulnerability Disclosure policy: we expect many more patches to land soon,” the AI company explained.
“Second, we are likely to be undercounting patches because some vulnerabilities are patched without a public advisory: in those cases, we’re reliant on scanning for the patches ourselves using Claude. Third, the low volume of patches reflects a genuine problem: even at our relatively slow pace of disclosures, Mythos Preview is adding to an already-overloaded security ecosystem,” it added.

Caveat…

By Junta • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

already-overloaded security ecosystem

This is true, but in part because a lot of ‘security’ reports are pretty bogus, even if they get CVEs and ‘security researchers’ call it a vulnerability, others may be inclined to roll their eyes. For example, the curl project had a write up:
https://daniel.haxx.se/blog/20…

So LLM findings I anticipate to be similar, but just a firehose of stuff to dig through to separate the real findings from the innocuous ones.

We likely will never have a grip on that, as it’s generally easiest to patch the report and not think about whether it *really* was a security risk. The patch may confirm incorrect behavior being acknowledged, but not whether it was realistically a ‘security’ risk or not.

90 days

By Tomahawk • Score: 5, Funny Thread
Here’s 23,000 vulnerabilities that we found, and we’re giving you 90 days to fix them.

And....go!

—-

Yes, it’s an average of 23 per project. But still.

It’s a crock of shit like their “acc compiler”

By MIPSPro • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Let’s look at what’s been released, CVE-wise. Something fewer than 10 LPEs mostly for Linux. They’ve released about 15 checksums for “future CVEs” they want to claim. One FreeBSD RCE. Zero OpenSSH or OpenSSL RCEs or LPEs. Something like 200-300 bugs claimed to be fixed by Mozilla using Mythos.

I don’t doubt that they’ve found some bugs, but they keep claiming thousands. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence and they simply haven’t produced every 1/10th of the evidence they need to substantiate their claims.

Show your cards or SHUT THE FUCK UP, Anthropic. You guys are annoying and I suspect you are giant liars, too. You sure as fuck lied about the C compiler. It was broke as fuck with no assembler and a useless non-working linker.

Re:It’s a crock of shit like their “acc compiler”

By gweihir • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Reminds me of those recent “271 zero days in Firefox!”. But in the patch notes, it was 3, two of them “use after free” that just shows shoddy engineering and not using techniques that prevent these and not using the tools that find these without any use of “AI” at all. And only one of these rated “high”. At the same time there were about 20 reports from people. Hence Mythos found a small part of the problems. Also note that people will keep finding more while Mythos is probably done after one go.

The LLM pushers are shamelessly lying. Looking at their abysmal business numbers, it becomes clear why they do. They need to improve revenue by about a factor of 10x very soon or they will just go bankrupt.

Patch up or shut up

By Weirsbaski • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
I thought the holy grail of AI in programming was to quickly write good code. So instead of finding “23,000 potential vulnerabilities”, let’s see Claude Mythos fix a substantial number of those 23,000 vulnerabilities, without introducing new vulnerabilities in the process.

They talk a big game, now it’s time for trial by fire.

Spain Blocks Polymarket and Kalshi

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Spain has temporarily blocked Polymarket and Kalshi while it investigates whether the prediction-market platforms are violating gambling laws by operating without a license. Engadget reports:
The country’s ministry in charge of consumer affairs said it blocked the websites as a precautionary measure pending an official investigation. This investigation will determine if the platforms violate Spain’s gambling laws. It’s set to complete within the next four months and could mandate that these companies require specific administrative licenses to operate.

waiting for the check

By zlives • Score: 5, Funny Thread

in other news Polymarket and Kalshi are about to make substanstive donations to spanish politicians.
you can bet or speculate on Polymarket and Kalshi as to how much.

Re:Goedel, Escher, and Howe

By Pseudonymous Powers • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
I guess what I’m saying is that there’s no way to fix the potential for corruption of a worldwide insider-trading laundromat. Because it’s not a bug, it’s a feature. It’s the only feature.

Re:How do they define “gambling?”

By stabiesoft • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
You could almost argue the stock market is not gambling. If you buy one of the major indexes, over a long enough period of time, you’ll win. Even the crash of 08 had you bought at the peak, and held until now, you’d be doing well. Contrast that with say “let it ride” in Vegas. How long until you are busted? I expect polymarket is worse than Vegas as the “house” advantage is giant with insiders everywhere. Unless you are the insider of course.

Don Jr. has his fingers in both PMs

By sinkskinkshrieks • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
It’s the only explanation for why there are no bets on the most anticipated obituary in history.

Uber, Lyft Drivers In Massachusetts Form First US Ride-Share Union

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Reuters:
Ride-share drivers for app-based companies such as Uber and Lyft have unionized in Massachusetts, forming what state officials and labor leaders said was the first officially recognized organization in the U.S. to represent such gig workers. The newly formed App Drivers Union received certification from the Massachusetts Department of Labor Relations on Friday to represent nearly 70,000 ride-share drivers operating as independent contractors in the state.

“It changes the game for ride-share workers across this country,” Massachusetts Governor Maura Healey, a Democrat, said at a rally with drivers and labor activists in Boston on Tuesday. The certification occurred after voters in November 2024 approved a ballot measure that created a novel framework to allow drivers for companies like Uber and Lyft to organize and bargain collectively over pay and benefits. That vote followed a years-long, nationwide battle over whether ride-share drivers should be considered independent contractors or employees entitled to benefits and wage protections.

In other words

By smooth wombat • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

It’s a taxi union.

Congratulations.

Re:Why is public transit so abysmal?

By Alinabi • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Europe has plenty of meth-heads too, yet public transportation there does not suck. The public transportation in the US sucks because the government doesn’t want to do what is necessary to overcome the cold start problem. To be useful, a mass transit needs to have a lot of busses. If you have to wait 30 minutes for a bus, nobody will use it. But to have a lot of busses you need a lot of riders to cover the cost. The only way to break this vicious cycle is for the government to subsidize it heavily in the beginning. This is culturally acceptable in Europe, but not in the US.

Uber and Lyft drivers - a 2020s thing

By presidenteloco • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
I don’t foresee that there will be any Uber and Lyft drivers by 2030, except a small and diminishing subset to serve the niche of people who won’t get in a self-driving taxi.

Re:Why is public transit so abysmal?

By 0123456 • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

> Europe has plenty of meth-heads too, yet public transportation there does not suck

Then maybe they keep the meth-heads off the buses. But in America that’s raxist or something.

There is never going to be a case where it’s better to walk to where you have to wait for a bus which takes you to somewhere you have to walk home from than to just get in your car and drive there, which is why European governments concentrate on making travel worse for drivers.

Re:Why is public transit so abysmal?

By Charlotte • Score: 4, Funny Thread

Your perspective from thousands of miles away must be spot on!

Netherlands Blocks US Takeover of Vital Digital Supplier

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
“Following months of public debate and protests against American IT giant Kyndryl’s proposed acquisition of Solvinity, a Dutch cloud provider that hosts the Netherlands’ online identity platform, the Dutch government has decided to block the acquisition,” writes longtime Slashdot reader rastakid. “The deal triggered fears that it would mean that ‘DigiD’ data would fall under foreign control, and could be demanded by U.S. authorities.” Politico reports:
In a letter to the national parliament published on Tuesday, State Secretary for Digital Economy Willemijn Aerdts said the national authority charged with screening investments had advised the government to block the acquisition. The purchase was seen as posing “a possible risk to the public interest.”

The government on Monday decided to adopt the advice and block the acquisition, Aerdts said. “The Netherlands attaches great value to the presence of foreign, especially U.S.-based tech companies, and their added value to the Dutch economy and digital infrastructure, but it maintains, at the same time, an independent investment screening framework aimed at protecting the public interest and which applies equally to all investors, independent of their country of origin,” the letter read.
Kyndryl said in a statement it was “extremely disappointed” about the decision. “The politicization of this process has overshadowed the clear and important benefits this transaction would have brought to Solvinity’s customers and Dutch citizens.”
Further reading: Challenges Face European Governments Pursuing ‘Digital Sovereignty’

DigiD explained

By thegarbz • Score: 5, Informative Thread

For those who don’t understand what DigiD is, it’s the identity verification system used by the Dutch government for… EVERYTHING. Want to change your health insurance? DigiD login. File your taxes? DigiD login. Register a change of address? DigiD login. Get a new driver’s license? DigiD login (after which you receive your new license and then use the app to link the new license to DigiD. Heck you want to get your local council to come and do a waste pick-up from your street - DigiD login.

The Netherlands is one of the most digitised countries in the world, but that comes of course with risks, they are very inflexible when the digital systems go down. That there wasn’t a legal mandate to keep this company under Dutch control is the most astounding thing that’s come out of this debate.

Incorporation is a privledge

By jacks smirking reven • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

So it’s well within reason and in fact a necessary function for governments to deny such acquisitions and mergers. This is a good reason, market conditions are a good reason, some companies just getting too big is a good reason. There’s no right to such things so they only happen at the behest of the public and that attitude should be used more often.

I can think of at least a couple dozen mergers and acquisitions in my lifetime that simply had no good reason to have happened besides shareholder value and have basically made life worse for everyone.

How many allies and partners?

By logjon • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
How many allies and partners have we threatened since Jan ‘25? How many have we waged economic warfare against, while rewarding dictators? How many have we threatened with fucking annexation like some tin pot shit hole? At this point, any liberal democracy would have to be suicidal to let this nation acquire so much as an ounce more leverage over them.

Re:First off… who is Kyndryl…

By thegarbz • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

And how did they become a “major player” in just five years since they were founded?

You may recognise them under their previous name: IBM.

They were a major player from the day they existed. They birthed onto the New York Stock exchange as a privileged nepobaby with a birthday present of 75% of the Fortune 100 business as “existing” customers, an 90000 IBM employees..

They did the right thing

By homerbrew • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Sadly, based on how our current administration has made some unreasonable demands from tech companies and other countries, I think they are doing the right thing. There is no way they should allow their highly private data to be held by a US company which could just as easily feed that data into Palintier or some other AI and your data will no longer be private. This admin has show they do not like data to be private at all

Nvidia Retires Its GeForce Control Panel App After 20 Years

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Nvidia is retiring its classic Control Panel for GeForce Game Ready and Studio Driver users after 20 years, as it pushes users to a newer, more unified “NVIDIA” app. Longtime Slashdot reader BrendaEM first shared the news, commenting: “Nvidia seems to no long want you to have control over your own video card that you paid your hard-earned money for? WTF!?” VideoCardz.com reports:
Existing Control Panel installs will remain on users’ systems. NVIDIA says the old panel will only disappear after a clean driver installation. Users who still need it can continue to download it from the Microsoft Store, but NVIDIA will no longer add new features, fixes, or other changes.

The retirement currently applies to Game Ready and Studio Drivers. NVIDIA RTX PRO users will continue to receive Control Panel support until the company moves professional features to the NVIDIA app. For GeForce users, NVIDIA says the app now includes the modern functionality previously available through Control Panel. […] The classic panel is therefore not being removed from every system overnight. It is being moved into maintenance mode for GeForce users…

Up next

By Unpopular Opinions • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

NVidia retires the entire RTX family of cards, citing lack of interest on the consumer markets, thus focusing on their new pet project, AI.

Enbloatification

By TonyCI • Score: 5, Informative Thread
I wouldn’t mind using a modern interface for the same functions as the Nvidia control panel, but the Nvidia app is a huge install with lots of tracking telemetry and functions you might never need. Even deselecting items during custom install reports back to Nvidia and if you use NVCleanInstall to strip it back to basics you risk it breaking as the app has hooks into other Nvidia libraries, which if missing will cause issues.

Re:Long Time Coming

By thegarbz • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

They don’t have two control applications. They have one control application and one fucking horrendous poorly programmed marketing app that serves only to force users to register for an nvidia account.

One is a control panel. The other seemingly exists to offer me a “Marvel Rivals Geforce Reward” whatever the fuck that is.

If anyone every programs a tool which has the “System” menu option next to a “Redeem” menu option I hope you get hit by a bus… and don’t die, but spend an eternity in pain.

Re:Enbloatification

By sabbede • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
Well, it doesn’t force you to sign in like GeForce Experience did, which is a plus. And it also now has all the features and controls as the old panel, which was slow as hell.

I still miss the XP Era Control Panel Applet

By Voyager529 • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Fast, effective, included the nView Desktop Manager to include transparency and window-shade mode to any window, and it was under 100MB installed.

Why nvidia drivers are now larger than Windows XP itself is a mystery to me, and they’ve always been a concession that has gotten bigger, slower, and more confusing than what they replaced.

California Moves To Exempt Linux From Upcoming Age-Verification Law

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
California lawmakers are moving to exempt most open-source operating systems from the state’s upcoming age-verification law after backlash from Linux and privacy advocates who warned that the original rules could force decentralized projects to collect users’ ages. The amendment would likely shield major Linux distributions, though SteamOS and other Linux-based platforms tied to proprietary app stores may still face compliance questions. Tom’s Hardware reports:
Assembly Bill 1856 (AB 1856), currently moving through California’s legislature ahead of committee reviews in June, would amend the state’s earlier age-assurance law by excluding software distributed under licenses that allow users to “copy, redistribute, and modify the software.” The proposed amendment specifically states: “Operating system provider” does not mean a person or entity that distributes an operating system or application under license terms that permit a recipient to copy, redistribute, and modify the software.

The amendment follows months of backlash after California passed the original Assembly Bill 1043 (AB 1043), formally known as the Digital Age Assurance Act, in late 2025. The law sought to shift online age verification away from individual websites and apps and down to the operating-system level instead. Under the original law, operating systems would be required to request a user’s age or birth date during device setup, then expose an “age bracket signal” to apps and app stores. The law, which defined brackets such as “under 13,” “13-15,” “16-17,” and “18+,” immediately raised questions about how such requirements would apply to decentralized, open-source software ecosystems. […]

AB 1856 does not repeal the original Digital Age Assurance Act. Instead, it narrows the definition of who qualifies as an “operating system provider” under the law. Commercial platforms with proprietary app ecosystems could remain subject to California’s age-assurance requirements even if most open-source Linux distributions are ultimately exempted. California Assembly Member Buffy Wicks introduced the amendment on February 11, 2026. However, the open-source exemption language appeared in later revisions that began drawing attention across Linux and privacy communities. The latest version is dated May 18, 2026, and as of May 19, 2026, the bill was read a second time and ordered to third reading.

Good laws need no exceptions

By sloth jr • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Age-verification at OS levels was always a terrible idea. It’s difficult to see under what rationale Linux should be granted an exception for this dumb idea. The solution is just to repeal the law and flog the sponsors.

Age Verification for any OS is insane

By SmaryJerry • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
This would be like requiring every single restaurant and fast food place to check photo ID because somewhere in the entire state a bar exists where you have to be 21.

Re:Good laws need no exceptions

By Anonymous Coward • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Age-verification at OS levels was always a terrible idea.

It’s an evil idea, because it rests upon the premise that a computer should act against its owner’s wishes.

And the reason Free Software is getting a carve-out, is because it can’t be forced into that horrific premise. When you’re running Free Software, any action performed by the computer is expected to be whatever you want. If you’re 12 years old and write

10 print “my user is 50 years old "
20 goto 10
30 end

it should work and it the computer prints the wrong thing (“my user is 12 years old”) then that’s a bug.

The original authors of the age verification law couldn’t conceive of this, because their experiences all involve using force against other people. Assholes can’t help but think like assholes.

Re: This should not be acceptble…

By ArmoredDragon • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Either the age check is very weak, or you have to provide your identity to the OS in a way that’s verifiable by somebody other than you, and completely disregards privacy. This is truly the dichotomy you’re dealing with here — pick one or the other. If it’s the former, then what’s the point of all of this?

I don’t see any way at all that this is workable. And assuming this happens anyways, does this mean your browser going to tell every website you visit what your age is upon request?

Re:This should not be acceptble…

By dgatwood • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

This should not be acceptable. Carve-outs are always temporary. Always. Do not give them an inch.

Wait ‘til they realize that Android is distributed under a license that allows people to copy, redistribute, and modify it.

As usual, a law created by people who didn’t think of the consequences then got modified to fix some of the worst consequences, but because they still did not think of the consequences, the modification created different consequences. And this is why we need better lawmakers.

Pope Leo Warns of Risks From AI In 42,300-Word Encyclical

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot
An anonymous reader quotes a report from the New York Times:
Pope Leo XIV on Monday set out a sweeping vision for corporate executives, politicians and individuals who will shape and be shaped by the future of artificial intelligence, warning leaders to safeguard humanity from A.I.‘s most disruptive effects. Leo’s declaration came in the form of a papal encyclical, an open letter to “all people of good will” that ran to roughly 42,300 words in its English version. It outlined his desire to protect human dignity and agency in an age in which technology threatens to replace humans in many professional and social roles. He presented it alongside Christopher Olah, a co-founder of Anthropic, a major A.I. developer, in a symbolic gesture of dialogue between leaders of the spiritual and technological worlds.

While emphasizing that “technology should not be considered, in itself, as a force antagonistic to humanity,” he wrote that “the pursuit of greater profits cannot justify choices that systematically sacrifice jobs.” Among other things, Leo called for:
- government regulation of the private companies that are driving the development of A.I.
- protection and retraining for workers whose jobs are threatened
- education to help students think critically about the technology
- action to protect children from violent, hypersexualized or fake information online that is often generated by A.I.
- safeguards to ensure that humans, not artificial intelligence, remain responsible for all decisions regarding the use of weapons.

Above all he emphasized the importance of retaining a fundamental social role for all human beings. “A society that guarantees employment to only a small fraction of the population, despite having a high level of technical development, risks exposing many to forced inactivity,” he wrote. “This creates a paradox of material progress and anthropological regression that undermines the foundations of a just and stable social peace,” he added.
Anthropic’s Christopher Olah said companies like his own need moral guidance to avoid being swayed by “a set of incentives and constraints that can sometimes conflict with doing the right thing.”
“We need moral voices that the incentives cannot bend,” Olah said. “Today is just the beginning — the start of a long collaboration between those of us who are building this and those who can see what we, from the inside, cannot.”

21st Century Malware, hits different. Literally.

By geekmux • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

We’ll have AI Hoover’s and AI robots guards and AI cars and all will be eventually regulated for health and safety and so on..

Let me just stop you right there and clarify what you ignorantly dismiss as “so on”.

When the AI-powered cloud-driven bot armed with hydraulic amounts of strength and cat-quick reflexes goes rogue inside your home because someone launched the next cyberattack from behind the security gates ala Solarwinds, there is only one concern you have. And that is regulation around security. Namely the kind of security that should have prevented such a malware horror story from threatening not merely family pictures on a hard drive, but your actual life and those you love.

My Solar-powered example, tends to validate how badly regulation tends to respond when it comes to actual protection. Lawsuits aren’t worth a shit when you’re dead.

Once upon a time, the malware threat wasn’t a physical one. Not anymore.

Can’t stand the competition

By 0xG • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

People are treating AIs as God-like.
They are asking all kinds of questions, spiritual and existential.
Commonly assuming that the AI is all-knowing, all-seeing etc.
So there is a shift from the established God to the ones we have created.
No wonder he is worried.

Re:Everyone is happy

By jacks smirking reven • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

People aren’t fearful of AI itself, they are fearful of the consequences, which really boils down to poverty.

Fear is AI is going to put people out of work and in America if you don’t have a job then you don’t have money and not having money really sucks.

We’re stressed out already with multiple recessions in the last 20 years, rising costs, a job market that’s gone loco (also partly a result of AI) and other factors. If people were secure in their homes, healthcare and livelihood I would imagine the fear of AI would be reduced and more philosophical.

Re: Yes, we should be concerned about these things

By superposed • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

All seems really short sighted. It’s like squeezing a balloon… doesn’t work unless it’s universally applied.

If you think the Pope should refrain from offering moral advice because some people may not follow it, I think you may have misunderstood how the Catholic Church works.

Re:Once upon a time

By thegarbz • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Kick back.

You can thank your life that many people took some of those incoherent ramblings of yours and did not actually kick back. That has to be the biggest mix of incoherent unconnected rubbish I’ve seen used to justify apathy and doing nothing. While I agree AI won’t end us let me address your points:

- No one beyond a few deranged lunatics thought the LHC was capable of generating a black hole.
- The Y2K bug was a real problem and thank christ no one took your advice to kick back and instead opted to spend countless night shifts making sure you slack lifestyle continues.
- No one beyond a few deranged lunatics through mobile phones cause cancer.
- Human cloning is a thing that isn’t done because it was regulated out of existence, not because we have difficulty with the tech. People didn’t kick back and addressed the issue.
- Microwaves did leak radiation. Early microwaves were a problem. They had poor door seals and no electrical interlocks. You could hurt yourself - and in the early 1970s there were documented cases of pacemakers sensing loops being disrupted by microwaves. Engineers didn’t kick back and addressed the issue.
- TV *HAS* rotted your brain - evidence: your post. The modern TV equivalent is social media, and that is actually causing people to do stupid things with fatal results.
- In the 1830s people did the experiment and quickly realised it wasn’t an issue and society moved on. We were *much* smarter back then. We looked at something, experimented and accepted the results. Comparatively we now live in a world where you’re quoting people thinking mobile phones cause cancer, despite literally every expert and every study showing it doesn’t.
- Nano machines ??? WTF?
- Nuclear reactors: Yeah they do, people listened to them and we no longer let for profit companies run wild doing whatever they want with nuclear reactors.

By all means I fully support your right to give no fucks about anything, but for the love of god man, don’t tell other people to do the same, they are keeping you alive!