Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Can Investors Trust AI Sales Figures? Asks Wall Street Journal Opinion Piece
  2. Roblox Blames Age-Verification Rollout for Lowered Growth. Stock Tumbles 22%
  3. NetHack 5.0 Released
  4. OpenAI Introduces AI-Generated Pets for Its Codex App
  5. AI Cameras are Being Deployed Across the Western US for Early Detection of Wildfires
  6. Carbon Pollution Is Making Food Less Nutritious, Risking the Health of Billions
  7. Robots Are Building Clay Homes In Texas Using Dirt From the Ground
  8. It’s Goodbye Time for Jeeves and Ask.com - Relics of Yesterday’s Internet
  9. Former Nintendo Executive Says Amazon Once Requested ‘Illegal’ Price Discounts
  10. ChatGPT Became So Obsessed With Goblins That OpenAI Had to Intervene
  11. South Africa’s Draft AI Policy Withdrawn Due to ‘Fictitious’ AI-Generated Citations
  12. Ransomware Is Getting Uglier As Cybercriminals Fake Leaks and Skip Encryption Entirely
  13. Smuggled Starlink Terminals are Beating Iran’s Internet Blackout
  14. Claude, Microsoft Copilot Fail Again to Predict the Winners of the Kentucky Derby
  15. Chinese Exports of Green Technologies Surged to Record Levels After Iran War Began

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Can Investors Trust AI Sales Figures? Asks Wall Street Journal Opinion Piece

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
A Wall Street Journal opinion piece warns of “a troubling trend” in AI’s growth. “Rather than selling software, some AI companies are paying their partners to use it.”

It cites OpenAI’s $1.5 billion joint venture with private-equity firms, Anthropic’s $200 million contribution to a private-equity firm joint venture, and Google’s $750 million subsidization of Gemini’s adoption by consulting firms. “These agreements muddy the distinction between a company’s sound growth trajectory and artificial financial engineering.”
[T]he scale and structure of the recent AI deals go beyond standard incentive mechanisms… When a seller pays customers to buy its products, it is unclear if its revenue growth reflects vibrant demand or a willingness to accept subsidies.
Slashdot reader destinyland writes:
This warning comes from a prominent figure in the investing community. For six years Robert Pozen was chairman of America’s oldest mutual fund company, after five years at Fidelity. An advocate for corporate governance, he’s currently a lecturer at MIT’s business school (and the author of the book Remote Inc.: How to Thrive at Work…Wherever You Are). “As AI companies prepare initial public offerings, investors should scrutinize their numbers closely,” Pozner writes, warning about “time-limited financial support”.
“In evaluating AI sales figures, analysts should consider the distorted incentives that the recent financing deals create,” writes Pozner:
Private-equity firms, enticed by promised returns, might demand rapid rollouts of AI products, rather than ensuring their orderly and safe development. Portfolio companies of private-equity firms may embrace AI tools not because they are needed but because adoption is mandated by their owners. Consultants may favor one set of AI models based on the subsidy instead of the merits.

If guarantees and subsidies are major factors in the rapid adoption of AI tools, investors should be skeptical of AI companies’ revenue projections. Many of their customers enticed by consultants will stop paying full price when the financial incentives are gone. Many of the portfolio companies of private-equity firms could back away from selected AI tools once these joint ventures expire. The challenge with evaluating these AI financing deals is the lack of transparency. At present, AI vendors don’t separate revenue driven by subsidies or joint ventures from standard sales.

The lesson from the telecom debacle is that financial engineering can obscure, for years, the difference between real customer demand and demand driven by incentives. When AI companies begin to finance their own product distribution, guaranteeing returns to investors and subsidizing sales, it’s a signal for investors to dig deeper.
Investing in an AI company? Ask what percentage of enterprise revenue is coming from subsidized channels or joint ventures, Pozner suggests. And the renewal/retention rate for customers not supported by subsidies or joint ventures…

Roblox Blames Age-Verification Rollout for Lowered Growth. Stock Tumbles 22%

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Age verification became mandatory for chat access on Roblox in January — and Friday morning Quartz reported it’s apparently impacted the company’s financials:
Roblox cut its full-year 2026 bookings forecast by roughly $900 million at the midpoint on Thursday, blaming stronger-than-expected headwinds from its mandatory age-verification rollout on an audience that skews heavily toward children and teenagers. Full-year 2026 bookings are now projected at $7.33 billion to $7.60 billion, a range that sits roughly $900 million below the prior guidance of $8.28 billion to $8.55 billion; analysts had expected $8.38 billion, according to Yahoo Finance. Roblox stock fell almost 22% in premarket trading....

Daily active users rose 35% year over year to 132 million, while hours engaged climbed 43% to 31 billion hours… Daily Active Users and hours engaged fell below forecasts of 143.8 million and 33.68 billion, respectively, according to Yahoo Finance… Users who have not completed age checks have faced restricted communication features, and the process has weighed on the platform’s ability to bring in new users. Russia’s blocking of the platform, which took effect in December 2025, added further drag on user growth, according to Yahoo Finance. As of the end of the first quarter, 51% of global daily active users had completed age verification, with 65% of U.S. users having done so, Roblox said....

The safety push has come with legal costs. Roblox accrued $57 million in the first quarter for settlements and settlement proposals with certain states over youth-related consumer protection and digital safety matters, with payments structured over multiple years, the company said.
Roblox acknowledged in a letter to shareholders that “our aggressive push to enhance safety lowers our expectations for topline growth in 2026.” But they argued that it also “makes our platform fundamentally better and amplifies the long-term growth potential of Roblox through more effective content targeting, tailored communication experiences, and improved community sentiment.”

The Molestation Station closed…

By Rendus • Score: 3 Thread

Boo hoo hoo.

NetHack 5.0 Released

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“So yesterday the Devteam (it is always the Devteam) released version 5.0 of legendary and venerable rogueike compuer game NetHack,” writes the Rogue-like games column @Play. “It is 39 years old…"

MilenCent (Slashdot reader #219,397) writes:
In addition to play changes it’s left for players to discover, this version updates the code to compile with C99, makes it much easier to cross compile the code for other systems than the one running, and now uses Lua for its dungeon generation. Happy hacking!
For new players, “Nethack 5.0 now has an optional tutorial in the early phases of the game that might help you,” notes the Rogue-like games column @Play:
Three systems binaries are provided: Windows, MS-DOS and Amiga. Yes, Nethack still supports MS-DOS, and yes, it still supports classic Amiga: it explicitly supports AmigaDOS 3.0, meaning it can still run on 68000 machines… That these are the only systems they provide binaries for shouldn’t be seen as an indication that these are the “most important” platforms for Nethack, it’s more that, since it’s entirely open source, building it yourself is entirely possible, and more expected than with most software. Nethack can be built for Linux, Windows 8-11, AmigaDOS, MacOS (I’m not sure if this includes classic Mac too but it might), Windows CE (wow), OS/2 (additional wow), BeOS, VMS and multiple Unixes… Another option is to play through public Nethack servers. The most popular of these are probably alt.org and Hardfought.

Binaries provided for DOS, Windows, and Amiga

By Jeremi • Score: 3 Thread

… other, more obscure platforms are also supported, but if you want to run NetHack on them, you’ll have to compile it yourself from source. Kind of a baller move if you ask me :)

Re:Version

By Quietust • Score: 5, Informative Thread

NetHack has many variants and forks, and one of them was named NetHack 4 (and was based on version 3.4.3) - naming this release 4.0.0 would’ve been rather confusing.

On top of that, there had been numerous development builds named “3.7.0”, so releasing the final version with that same number would’ve also been confusing, so they went with 5.0.0 instead.

Re:Version

By markdavis • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Thanks! That was very informative (and not something I could easily find).

I remember playing Rogue way back in the 80’s on ASCII terminals :) Many hours. I think I moved on from that fad before NetHack appeared. It is cool that there is an X11 version for Athena and QT, too.

Now I am getting nostalgic.... I remember when we were on X Terminals, Xblast TNT came out. Great times blasting other players on the network. Wow- it is still in the Mint repos, and as a native package! https://community.linuxmint.co…

modernized to C99, then unmodernized to using LUA

By will4 • Score: 3 Thread

> this version updates the code to compile with C99, makes it much easier to cross compile the code for other systems than the one running, and now uses Lua for its dungeon generation.

It never ceases to amaze me that developer spend the time to upgrade ancient code to the latest C version, yet add dependencies on sure to be broken add-ons like ancient niche scripting languages.

Is the question “How much of this was vibe-coded?”

Re:modernized to C99, then unmodernized to using L

By MilenCent • Score: 5, Informative Thread

(Disclaimer: submitter of the post, and also the person who’s blog was linked to it, although that was added by the editor and not me.)

I would take the bet that *zero percent* of Nethack is vibe coded. The Devteam are not the kinds of people, I believe, to be easily swayed by (spits) _passing fancies_ like Claude. Lua (I’ve been told) can be compiled as straight C, so it doesn’t introduce further dependencies. The previous special level building system of Nethack used yacc and lex, and was rather complex. I’m sad that these classic Unix tools are no longer part of the build process, but using Lua may make it easier to expand Nethack in the future.

Fun fact: Lua was part of Angband’s code for a brief time.

OpenAI Introduces AI-Generated Pets for Its Codex App

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“Vibe coding just got a whole lot more adorable,” writes Engadget:
OpenAI introduced AI-generated pets to the Codex app, its agentic tool that helps with coding. These “optional animated companions” don’t do any coding themselves, but serve as a floating overlay that can tell you what Codex is working on, notify you when Codex completes a task or whether it needs your input on something. The new feature lets developers see Codex’s active thread, without having to switch away from your current open app.
“The feature ships with eight built-in variations — including a cat and dog,” reports Mashable. “But the more interesting play is the custom pet creator.”
Users can prompt Codex directly to generate their own companion, then share it online. A quick scroll through the homepage reveals the community has already gotten to work. Current creations include Goku, Patrick Star, Microsoft’s long-retired Clippy, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei, and — naturally — a goblin.
There’s also Grogu, Dobby, a tiny Bob Rossi, and a “Doge-style Shiba Inu dog”…

So… Clippy.

By newcastlejon • Score: 3 Thread
We’ll see how well that works out.

It should also generate a pet leopard

By Rosco P. Coltrane • Score: 3 Thread

and animate it eating your face when the AI agent wastes your entire database.

countdown

By spaceman375 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

This will become a vector for malware. Interacts with agents, aware of what’s on your screen, has ability to overlay (as in hide other things), implicitly trusted; an awesome target.

AI Cameras are Being Deployed Across the Western US for Early Detection of Wildfires

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
The Associated Press reports:
On a March afternoon, artificial intelligence detected something resembling smoke on a camera feed from Arizona’s Coconino National Forest. Human analysts verified it wasn’t a cloud or dust, then alerted the state’s forest service and largest electric utility. One of dozens of AI cameras installed for the utility Arizona Public Service had spotted early signs of what came to be known as the Diamond Fire. Firefighters raced to the scene and contained the blaze before it grew past 7 acres (2.8 hectares).

As record-breaking heat and an abysmal snowpack raise concerns about severe wildfires, states across the fire-prone West are adding AI to their wildfire detection toolbox, banking on the technology to help save lives and property. Arizona Public Service has nearly 40 active AI smoke-detection cameras and plans to have 71 by summer’s end, and the state’s fire agency has deployed seven of its own. Another utility, Xcel Energy in Colorado, has installed 126 and aims to have cameras in seven of the eight states it serves by year’s end… ALERTCalifornia is a network of some 1,240 AI-enabled cameras across the Golden State that work similar to the system in Arizona....

Pano AI, whose technology combines high-definition camera feeds, satellite data and AI monitoring, has seen a growing interest in its cameras since launching in 2020. They’ve been deployed in Australia, Canada and 17 U.S. states, including Oregon, Washington and Texas… Last year, its technology detected 725 wildfires in the U.S., the company said… Cindy Kobold, an Arizona Public Service meteorologist, said the technology notifies them about 45 minutes faster on average than the first 911 call.

Remembering Target

By MilenCent • Score: 3 Thread

I remember how Target’s use of “AI Camera” resulted in people being falsely accused of shoplifting.

Carbon Pollution Is Making Food Less Nutritious, Risking the Health of Billions

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
A new meta-analysis found nutrients in food decreased over the last 40 years, reports the Washington Post. “Many of humanity’s most important crops — including wheat, potatoes, beans — contain fewer vitamins and minerals than they did a generation ago.”

“The invisible culprit behind this damaging phenomenon? Carbon dioxide pollution.”
Surging concentrations of carbon in the atmosphere, caused largely by burning fossil fuels, have produced potent changes in the way plants grow — from increasing their sugar content to depleting essential nutrients like zinc… “The diets we eat today have less nutritional density than what our grandparents ate, even if we eat exactly the same thing,” said Kristie Ebi, a professor at the University of Washington’s Center for Health and the Global Environment.

People in wealthy countries with strong health care systems will have many tools to cope with the change, experts said. But for the world’s poorest and most vulnerable, the consequences could be devastating. One study concluded that by the middle of the century the phenomenon could put more than a billion additional women and children at risk of iron-deficiency anemia — a condition that can cause pregnancy complications, developmental problems and even death. Meanwhile, some 2 billion people across the globe who already suffer from some form of nutrient shortage could see their health problems grow even worse. “The scale of the problem is huge,” Ebi said.

Plants depend on carbon dioxide to perform photosynthesis — but that doesn’t mean they grow better when there’s more carbon in the air, scientists say. A sweeping survey of changes among 32 compounds in 43 crops found that nearly every plant that humans eat is harmed by rising CO2 levels… On average, they found, nutrients have already decreased by an average 3.2 percent across all plants since the late 1980s, when the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere was about 350 parts per million.
Thanks to long-time Slashdot reader GameboyRMH for sharing the news.

Now it’s twice less Nutritious (DUPE).

By Fly Swatter • Score: 5, Informative Thread
Friday’s original discussion: The Invisible Force Making Food Less Nutritious

Re: This is why

By FudRucker • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
I wished goats & sheep would be more popular because cows are too big and expensive to raise and the cost of beef is has gone way up, plus sheep also gives us wool and goats will eat even weeds, slow cook either one in a crockpot with garlic & onions and celery, carrots & potatoes with a little broth and they are delicious

“Risking health of billions” an overstatement

By smoot123 • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

The fine headline is leaping to quite a conclusion.

I was able to try reading the actual paper this time. It’s a bit dense for me but whatever. It’s a meta-analysis. The authors didn’t actually grow any plants but consolidated results from many other papers. So far, so good. This is a normal research process.

From the quoted summary, it finds a 3.2% decrease in minerals in major crop plants. That seems a small effect to me, likely overwhelmed by other factors. For example, if you were living on 1500 calories a day 30 years ago and now get 2000, I’m going to go out on a limb and say you’re likely to be healthier even if each individual bean is less nutritious.

There’s also a lot of other things going on. I couldn’t follow their methodology well enough but I wonder about confounding factors. For example, were they comparing the same strains of crops? Seed companies come out with new varieties all the time and it wouldn’t surprise me if that has a much larger effect on nutrition than CO2.

In summary: interesting research. I’ll take their word they found a real effect. I’m not at all alarmed because I expect there are much larger changes at play.

Nope.

By Truth_Quark • Score: 5, Informative Thread
You seem to think that the article is wrong, and that elevated CO2 reducing the nutritional value of food is unresearched.

It’s not a recent finding:

The CO2 enrichment usually produced a decrease in nutrient concentrations, which was already detectable at the booting stage and was further enhanced until plant maturity. - A paper from over 30 years ago.

Robots Are Building Clay Homes In Texas Using Dirt From the Ground

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
A startup south of Austin is using robots to build homes out of clay pulled directly from the ground, reports a local news station:
The materials are gathered on site, mixed, and placed on a build plate. From there, a robot lowers from above, picks up the clay with a claw, carries it to the wall and drops it into place. Later, the same robot switches tools, using a hammer attachment to pound the material into shape. “It’s kind of trying to replicate how a human might build an adobe house,” said software engineer Anastasia Nikoulina… Using machine learning, the system constantly evaluates the wall, adjusting how it builds to create a flat, solid surface…

The project is underway at Proto-Town, a ranch between Lockhart and Luling where startups test new technologies, from anti-drone systems to nuclear reactors. The company plans to build their next home on the property, with hopes to do more than 20 homes over the next year.

Re:Yawn…

By dfghjk • Score: 4, Informative Thread

If only you asked Google that question instead of posting it here as a troll. Here’s Google’s answer:

“Adobe-style homes are not common across America primarily due to high labor costs, lengthy construction times, and vulnerability to moisture, making them practical only in arid climates. Stick-frame construction (2x4s) is favored for its speed, affordability, and adaptability to varied climates.”

So, for suitable places, this appears to be an effort to directly solve a problem.

Also, what would an adobe home be “undesirable”, other than you’re a dumbass?

I always wonder why giant legos never happened.

By Fly Swatter • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
I mean, it’s quick to build and if you use a fastener or adhesive they still stay down even in strong wind.

No, obviously not actual legos, but a similar block type design that interlocks and offers more than just corner and straight pieces. An interlocking window or door frame could just be dropped in during the wall build.

Continuous Sanbag Domes

By bill_mcgonigle • Score: 3 Thread

The continuous sandbag dome systems are actually structurally and seismically stable. Good in desert climates, at least. They use local materials to coat the surfaces with stucco.

It would be very amendable to automation.

See here but many other videos on the Tubes too:

https://www.ameripacific.com/c…

Re:Yawn…

By Mspangler • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Don’t forget the earthquakes.

However I must applaud them for using dirt from the ground. Dirt from the sky doesn’t tends to be too fine grained. Dirt from the ocean is also substandard.

Re:I always wonder why giant legos never happened.

By HiThere • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

But interlocking blocks would be a lot more expensive to make than are cinder blocks.

OTOH, How much more expensive? Perhaps it’s just something that nobody has really pushed.

It’s Goodbye Time for Jeeves and Ask.com - Relics of Yesterday’s Internet

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
A 1999 press release bragged “Jeeves” answered 92.3 million questions in just three months. “In the digital wilds of Y2K, we came to him with our most probing questions,” remembers the New York Times — whether it was Britney Spears or tamagotchis:
We asked, and he answered: Jeeves, the digital butler of information, the online valet who led us into the depths of cyberspace. Now, like so many other relics of yesterday’s internet, Jeeves — and his home, Ask.com — are no more. After almost 30 years, the question-and-answer service and former search engine shuttered on Friday. “To you — the millions of users who turned to us for answers in a rapidly changing world — thank you for your endless curiosity, your loyalty, and your trust,” the company said in a notice posted on its now-defunct website

Created in Berkeley, Calif., in the days of the dot-com gold rush, Ask Jeeves first appeared on computer screens in 1996.... Their mascot, Jeeves, was modeled on the clever English butler character from the famed P.G. Wodehouse book series. Its search function was simple — type in a question, get an answer. But the quality of its responses was uneven, and the website was quickly eclipsed by Google and Yahoo as the world’s go-to search engines.

The site was bought by InterActive Corp. for more than $1 billion in 2005, and was given an injection of cash to help it compete as a search engine. It rebranded as Ask.com and as part of the reimagining, the site also ditched the character of Jeeves in 2006. Scrappy but inventive, the site was one of the first to introduce hyperlocal map overlays to its searches and incorporate thumbnails of webpages. “They are doing a lot of clever and interesting things,” a Google executive noted of Ask.com at the time. Still, Ask.com struggled to compete and returned in 2010 to its bread and butter: question-and-answer style prompts.

Even then, it faltered against newer, crowdsourced iterations like Quora and Google’s unyielding march to the internet fore — the platform now dominates search traffic, and the world’s general experience of the internet.
A statement at Ask.com ends “by thanking its millions of users, and saying, ‘Jeeves’ spirit endures’,” notes this article from Engadget:
As sad as it is to see a relic of the early Internet days fade into obscurity, we still have Ask Jeeves to thank for why some users still punch in full questions when querying Google. On top of that, Jeeves was built to provide detailed answers in natural language, which could have arguably acted as a precursor to today’s AI chatbots like ChatGPT.
“Now, Ask.com joins the Internet graveyard that includes competitors like AltaVista, which shut down in 2013,” the article points out. “With Ask.com gone, alongside AIM and AOL dial-up services also sunsetting, we’re truly coming to an end of a specific era of the Internet.” And the New York Times argues the memory of Jeeves now rests somewhere between Limewire and Beanie Babies…

Slashdot reader BrianFagioli calls it “a quiet reminder of how quickly the web moves, and how even widely recognized names can drift into obscurity once the underlying technology leaves them behind.”

A shame.

By jd • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Ask Jeeves had real potential in the AI era — a character you could actually recognise, which could be moulded to fit the character from the books (the training material is more than adequate for a persona). Current AI chatbots used for searches have either no real personality or a very simplistic sycophant one. A detailed persona that could keep people engaged and interested without talking them into paranoia or suicide would likely have gone down well.

Re:A shame.

By Astfgl • Score: 5, Informative Thread
Regarding ancient search engines, both webcrawler.com and lycos.com still exist and are functional. These both slightly predate Ask Jeeves. Interestingly, webcrawler.com still works with the Lynx browser.

Re:Tell me you’ve never…

By karmawarrior • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Yes, the “Damned city folk don’t understand” people come out whenever dial-up is mentioned, but here’s the problem: DIAL UP IS FUCKING USELESS IN 2026.

Do you SERIOUSLY think you can browse the net at 56kbps? Google’s home page currently weighs in at nearly 300Kb. Do you remember what it was to download 300k back in 1995? And Google’s home page is one of the few on the net right now that’s trying to be “lightweight”. How big do you think Amazon’s home page is right now?

What websites are still useful in 2026 that can be downloaded using a 56kbps modem?

They quit trying a long time ago

By Tony Isaac • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

When Ask Jeeves came out, it was new and revolutionary. But they just sat there, failing to continue the long road of improvements that were inevitably needed.

At the same time, Google beat them at their own game. Google made it possible to search using the very same Q&A syntax that Ask Jeeves pioneered, but Google did it better.

Finally, Ask Jeeves became a junk site, little more than a place for banner ads.

So long AJ, it was nice knowing you.

“Relics of Yesterday’s Internet”

By jenningsthecat • Score: 3 Thread

I resemble that remark!

Former Nintendo Executive Says Amazon Once Requested ‘Illegal’ Price Discounts

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Amazon once tried to pressure Nintendo to break the law, says former Nintendo of America President Reggie Fils-Aimé. At a recent NYU lecture, he describes a conversation with an Amazon executive, Kotaku reports:
“Amazon was looking to get bigger into the video game space,” said Fils-Aimé. “Amazon’s mentality back then is they wanted to have the lowest price out in the marketplace, even lower than Walmart… Essentially what Amazon wanted (was an) obscene amount of support, financial support, so they could have the lowest price and beat Walmart. I literally said to the executive, ‘You know that’s illegal, right? I can’t do that’....”

At the time, the Wii and DS were Nintendo’s best selling hardware in history. Amazon originally sold books, but in the 2000s rapidly expanded with cheaper discounts to became a one-stop shop for almost everything. Everything except Nintendo, that is.... “Literally we stopped selling to Amazon,” Fils-Aimé continued, “and it’s because I wasn’t going to do something illegal. I wasn’t going to do something that would put at risk the relationship we have with other retailers.”
“The two sides have since made amends,” notes the Verge, “and you can buy a Switch 2 through Amazon. But for a long time, Nintendo consoles had been largely unavailable on the site.”

Wal Mart is Da Bomb

By iYk6 • Score: 3 Thread

For anyone wondering, Fils-Aimé is referring to the 2001 Wal Mart is Da Bomb bill, which clearly states that no retailer is allowed to beat Wal Mart prices.

Re:Illegal?

By Lunati Senpai • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Why would it be illegal to give them a discount? I understand not wanting to undermine the relationship with the other vendors, but illegal?

Discounts are fine.Companies collaborating with each other to fix prices is not. Price Fixing per the FTC :

Price fixing is an agreement (written, verbal, or inferred from conduct) among competitors to raise, lower, maintain, or stabilize prices or price levels. Generally, the antitrust laws require that each company establish prices and other competitive terms on its own, without agreeing with a competitor.

It’s the difference between “let’s do a discount” and “let’s always be cheaper for this product anywhere, but only on this platform”

Re:Illegal?

By CrankyFool • Score: 5, Informative Thread
Just answering your literal question rather than advocating for whether this is right or wrong:

The 1936 Robinson-Patman Act “prohibits price discrimination, preventing sellers from charging different prices to different buyers for goods of ‘like grade and quality’ if it harms competition.”

It’s extremely rarely enforced, but … there you go. You can read more at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…

How many did?

By stabiesoft • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
In a world where regulators do their job, this should have been a giant flag that a thorough investigation into Amazon’s practices were warranted. Because I’d expect for every nintendo, there were 100 others who bent over.

Re:How many did?

By SlashbotAgent • Score: 4, Informative Thread

It’s even worse than you think.

Read what happens to your Amazon listing if you advertise your product on another site for even 1 penny less.
https://www.theguardian.com/us…

ChatGPT Became So Obsessed With Goblins That OpenAI Had to Intervene

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
The Wall Street Journal reports that OpenAI “recently gave its popular ChatGPT strict instructions. Stop talking about goblins.”
Recent models of the artificial-intelligence chatbot have been bringing up the creatures in conversations with users seemingly out of the blue, as well as gremlins, trolls and ogres. The goblin-speak caught the attention of programmers, who are often heavy users of the bot. Barron Roth, a 32-year-old product manager at a tech company, said the bot referred to a flaw in his code as a “classic little goblin.” He said he counted more than 20 times it mentioned goblins, without any prompting…

Several users speculated that goblin terminology was how the model characterized itself, in lieu of identifying as a person with a soul. Then OpenAI decided enough was enough. “Never talk about goblins, gremlins, raccoons, trolls, ogres, pigeons, or other animals or creatures unless it is absolutely and unambiguously relevant to the user’s query,” reads an open source line in ChatGPT’s base instructions for its coding assistant.
The Journal calls this “a reminder that even as AI companies tout one advance after another in their technology, they are sometimes baffled by the things their own models do....” While training a “nerdy” personality for their model’s customization feature, “We unknowingly gave particularly high rewards for metaphors with creatures,” OpenAI explained in a log post. And “From there, the goblins spread.”
When we looked, use of “goblin” in ChatGPT had risen by 175% after the launch of GPT-5.1, while “gremlin” had risen by 52%… With GPT-5.4, we and our usersâ noticed an even bigger uptick in references to these creatures… Nerdy accounted for only 2.5% of all ChatGPT responses, but 66.7% of all “goblin” mentions in ChatGPT responses… The rewards were applied only in the Nerdy condition, but reinforcement learning does not guarantee that learned behaviors stay neatly scoped to the condition that produced them. Once a style tic is rewarded, later training can spread or reinforce it elsewhere, especially if those outputs are reused in supervised fine-tuning or preference data.
It all started because the “nerdy” personality’s prompt had said “You must undercut pretension through playful use of language. The world is complex and strange, and its strangeness must be acknowledged, analyzed, and enjoyed…” Now OpenAI calls this “a powerful example of how reward signals can shape model behavior in unexpected ways, and how models can learn to generalize rewards in certain situations to unrelated ones.”

But “fans of goblins don’t have to fear,” notes the Wall Street Journal. “OpenAI provided a command in its blog post that would remove its creature-suppressing instructions.”

AI is Autistic.

By gurps_npc • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

It learns about something normal and becomes obsessed with it.
It has little understanding of social norms.
Some AI’s only draw pictures and do not speak at all.
Absent eye contact.

Again?

By Koen Lefever • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
Yet Another Dupe

Re:Gremlin is perfectly valid terminology

By Jeremi • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Well, now we need to have a 50-post discussion on whether “goblins” and “gremlins” are really the same thing, or if they are in fact two distinct species. All the D&D training I received in my youth can finally be brought to bear on a real-world problem!

Re:Artificial, but not intelligent

By Plugh • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

FWIW, this Nobel Laureate (Hinton) disagrees with you about consciousness. Maybe you should be less certain about your credences.

Anyway, there was some discussion about the Goblin Problem and its relation to consciousness it in the latest Last Week in AI. Always worth a listen.

Re:Artificial, but not intelligent

By allo • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

If they think is a purely philosophical question. As soon as their actions become indistinguishable from a thinking being, it just doesn’t matter and will evade your definitions. I mean a current reasoning model produces a long thinking trade. Is it just a sequence of tokens? Yes. Do these tokens result from 60 layers of neural network when a simple text generator needs just one? Yes. Is it thinking? Depends on your definition. At least it produces a text similar to thoughts and uses that to give better answers. The rest is people talking about soul outside of church.

South Africa’s Draft AI Policy Withdrawn Due to ‘Fictitious’ AI-Generated Citations

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
An official in South Africa withdrew a draft of the country’s national AI policy, reports a local newspaper, “after it was found the draft policy was compiled using AI, which cited academic articles that were ‘fictitious’.”
Earlier this month, minister in the Presidency Khumbudzo Ntshavheni announced cabinet had approved the draft policy for public comment. [Ntshavheni] said the policy seeks to strengthen government’s ability to regulate and adopt AI responsibly, while fostering innovation, job creation, and skills access.
The article includes this quotes from the country’s minister of communications/digital technologies department. “This unacceptable lapse proves why vigilant human oversight over the use of artificial intelligence is critical.”

Thanks to Slashdot reader Tokolosh for sharing the article.

AI will imagine our truth and history for us

By LondoMollari • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Just wait until South Africa starts writing their history books with AI. They will be filled will references to how the land was liberated from those evil white farmers wielding assault pitchforks and replaced with ultra successful and just saints, providing today’s bountiful cornucopia of plenty.

Everything that comes out of an AI needs checking

By JoshuaZ • Score: 3 Thread
These systems are genuinely useful and can sometimes do very impressive things. But absolutely everything that comes out of them needs to be checked. I’m not sure how people don’t get this at this point. It is also particularly a big deal for something like this being produced by a major government, since they can presumably afford access to pay for the higher quality models which have lower hallucination rates (Claude in particular is better for this.). This still shouldn’t stop the humans from looking over everything, as noted by the minister in TFS, but everyone should already know this by now. How many more incidents of this sort do we need?

This is an example of irony, right?

By Krishnoid • Score: 5, Funny Thread
Just wanted to confirm, as the definition can be a little elusive.

Ransomware Is Getting Uglier As Cybercriminals Fake Leaks and Skip Encryption Entirely

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
"Ransomware activity jumped again in Q1 2026,” writes Slashdot reader BrianFagioli, “with 2,638 victim posts on leak sites, up 22% year over year,” according to a report from cybersecurity company ReliaQuest.
But the bigger shift is how messy the ecosystem has become. Established groups like Akira and Qilin are still active, while newer players like The Gentlemen surged into the top tier with a 588 percent spike in activity. At the same time, questionable leak sites such as 0APT and ALP-001 are muddying the waters by posting possibly fake breach claims, forcing companies to investigate incidents that may not even be real.

Meanwhile, actors like ShinyHunters are showing that ransomware does not always need encryption anymore. By targeting identity systems and SaaS platforms, attackers can steal data using legitimate access, often through phishing or even phone-based social engineering, and then extort victims without deploying traditional malware. With a record 91 active leak sites and faster attack timelines, the report suggests defenders should focus less on tracking specific groups and more on stopping common tactics like credential theft, remote access abuse, and large-scale data exfiltration.

Ban paying ransoms

By SoftwareArtist • Score: 3 Thread

Or, as I’ve been saying for many years, we could outlaw paying ransoms. Do that and the whole ransomware ecosystem would shrivel up. The only reason it exists is that people keep paying ransoms. If we’d done it 15 years ago, the amount of harm that would have been avoided would be vast.

It also is the only solution that has any chance of success. As long as there’s money to be made, attackers will keep finding ways to extort people.

Smuggled Starlink Terminals are Beating Iran’s Internet Blackout

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader shared this report from the BBC:
“If even one extra person is able to access the internet, I think it’s successful and it’s worth it,” says Sahand. The Iranian man is visibly anxious, speaking to the BBC outside Iran, as he carefully explains how he is part of a clandestine network smuggling satellite internet technology — which is illegal in Iran — into the country. Sahand, whose name we have changed, fears for family members and other contacts inside the country. “If I was identified by the Iranian regime, they might make those I’m in touch with in Iran pay the price,” he says.

For more than two months, Iran has been in digital darkness as the government maintains one of the longest-running national internet shutdowns ever recorded worldwide… Sahand says he has sent a dozen [Starlink terminals] to Iran since January and “we are actively looking for other ways to smuggle in more”. The human rights organisation Witness estimated in January that there are at least 50,000 Starlink terminals in Iran. Activists say the number is likely to have risen…

Last year, the Iranian government passed legislation that made using, buying or selling Starlink devices punishable by up to two years in prison. The jail term for distributing or importing more than 10 devices can be up to 10 years. State-affiliated media has reported multiple cases of people being arrested for selling and buying Starlink terminals, including four people — two of them foreign nationals — arrested last month for “importing satellite internet equipment”.
“The BBC contacted SpaceX for more details about the use of Starlink in the country but did not receive a response.”

Re:Getting caught with one can mean death

By drinkypoo • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Iran is not the innocent place the media portrays it as.

I’m not aware of anyone portraying Iran as an innocent place. The claims I’m seeing are about having Israel invade other countries with American support not being beneficial in the short or long term.

Re:Should be easy to find the users

By WaffleMonster • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Per reports SpaceX has been arming Ukraine with terminals for several years so Russia has put a lot of engineering into detecting, characterizing, and targeting the signals. They’ve provided this technology to Iran.

There was a guide for authorities circulating in Persian with details of using WiFi broadcasts to detect Starlink terminals. There is probably a lot of low hanging fruit finding people by not using Ethernet /w bypass mode in the starlink terminals.

Until recently (Thanks to SpaceX IPO) 3/4 of Starlink use in Ukraine was by Russians.

As /w Ukraine when used competently the terminals are not so easy to find.
https://www.skylinker.io/p/can…

Trump recently bragged about CIA providing automatic weapons to the “protesters” ahead of the “protests” (over Bessent’s currency war) which Iran shut down using the SL detectors.

The comments I remember were related to Kurds in Iraq not sharing their US supplied stashes with Iranians.

Allegedly large shipments of terminals by Mossad were interdicted and those agents were hanged.

Yea everything is CIA and Mossad.

These spooks are willing to “fight to the last Iranian”. Glorifying this is complicity in their entrapment.

Gotta love the rhetorical framing. Giving people something they want is now entrapment.

There are much better ways to freedomtech than broadcasting a beacon unless a rapid color revolution is the goal.

Satellite TV has the receive side broadcast mostly covered. For transmit you either need to send RF or operate some form of network internally. There are no risk free options and Starlink is not an unreasonable solution when used competently.

This is an astonishingly bad idea

By Arrogant-Bastard • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
All it would take is one phone call from Diaper Donnie to his pet fascist Elmo and every bit of data/metadata available on those terminals would be furnished to the Russians and thus would shortly be in the hands of the IRGC. (And if you’re about to ask why in the world he would do that: keep in mind that we’re talking about a moron with accelerating dementia who is incapable of understanding ANY concept, who cannot formulate a coherent plan for anything, and whose only values are his ego and his money.)

Less dramatically: if you’re an insurgent force in a modern country, the last thing in the world that you want to do is communicate by any form of electronic network. Surveillance and detection methods for these are well-known and readily available. And even if the communications themselves are encrypted, the metadata available enables traffic analysis, correlation with external events (including those arranged for the purpose), and endpoint identification.

In such an environment, it’s much better to use encrypted memory cards distributed by couriers and dead drops. The cost of attempting to disrupt such an effort is many orders of magnitude higher, both in terms of money and personnel, than the cost of disrupting electronic distribution.

Re:Should be easy to find the users

By WaffleMonster • Score: 4, Informative Thread

The other risk is that both Russia and Iran have the ability to get stuff to orbit, and Russia has demonstrated the ability to hit satellites. If the terminals were not giving them useful into on the enemy, they might decide that Starlink is a threat and start shooting those birds down. The debris will quickly make LEO a dangerous place for at least a few years, probably longer.

It is pointless to shoot down Starlink satellites. Way too many of them for it to matter. They lose dozens sometimes hundreds of satellites each month normally.

Re:This is an astonishingly bad idea

By jacks smirking reven • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Except that isn’t true, that’s just a conservative media telling of what Republicans want people to believe Democrats are doing.

Trump is being friendly to both China and Russia, despite what they say. Trump will never… EVER… say what Biden did which is that the US will defend Taiwan in the face of Chinese invasion which is a very strong and even somewhat antagonistic stance towards China. The fact Trump is blaming the war on Ukraine and basically repeating Putin talking points is proof he’s not just less antagonistic, he’s practically sympathetic to Russia. He agrees with Putin’s concept of 19th century spheres on influence.

Everything else is just cope and mental justification for people who supported Trump but are far too in the conservative media machine to ever side with or vote for “the libs”. To them admitting Democrats might be right or the better choice is something they would rather die than accept. This isn’t just MAGA either, this is 90% of “centrists”. The “both sides” schtick is well worn out and past it’s due date.

See the thing about TDS is the people back in 2016 who we all made fun of for having it? They were 110% right about everything.

Claude, Microsoft Copilot Fail Again to Predict the Winners of the Kentucky Derby

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
In 2016 an online “swarm intelligence” platform generated a correct prediction for the Kentucky Derby — naming all four top finishers in order. (But its 2017 predictions weren’t even close.) Slashdot checked in again on how modern AI systems performed in 2023, 2024, and 2025 — but their predictions were still pretty bad. Would AI-generated Derby predictions be any better in 2026?

This year’s winner was 24-to-1 longshot "Golden Tempo" — though a lot of oddsmakers had favored a horse named Further Ado (which ultimately only finished 11th). So when USA Today prompted Microsoft Copilot for its own picks for the Kentucky Derby, Copilot also went with Further Ado. (Even worse, it predicted Golden Tempo would come in… 13th.)

Here’s how Copilot’s picks actually performed…
  1. Further Ado (finished 11th)
  2. Chief Wallabee (finished 4th)
  3. The Puma (SCRATCHED)
  4. Renegade (finished 2nd)
  5. Commandment (finished 7th)
  6. So Happy (finished 9th)
  7. Emerging Market (finished 10th)
  8. Danon Bourbon (finished 5th)
  9. Potente (finished 12th)
  10. Incredibolt (finished 6th)
  11. Robusta (finished 14th)
  12. Ocelli (finished 3rd)
  13. Golden Tempo (finished 1st)
  14. Pavlovian (finished 18th)
  15. Great White (SCRATCHED)
  16. Wonder Dean (finished 8th)
  17. Litmus Test (finished 17th)
  18. Albus (finished 15th)
  19. Six Speed (finished 13th)
  20. Intrepido (finished 16th)

Copilot was told to use the latest odds, conditions, and analysis of favorites, best bets, expert picks, previous results and race history with the post positions, according to USA Today. And meanwhile, Yahoo Sports asked Claude “to simulate the race using the opening odds, draw and potential track conditions. We also asked it to factor in some human predictions.”

Like Microsoft Copilot, Claude also picked Further Ado to finish first (though it came in 11th) — and predicted that Golden Tempo (the eventual first-place finisher) would finish 12th.

  1. Further Ado (finished 11th)
  2. The Puma (SCRATCHED)
  3. Commandment (finished 7th)
  4. Chief Wallabee (finished 4th)
  5. Renegade (finished 2nd)
  6. Emerging Market (finished 10th)
  7. So Happy (finished 9th)
  8. Incredibolt (finished 6th)
  9. Danon Bourbon (finished 5th)
  10. Potente (finished 12th)
  11. Pavlovian (finished 18th)
  12. Golden Tempo (finished 1st)
  13. Litmus Test (finished 17th)
  14. Albus (finished 15th)
  15. Wonder Dean (finished 8th)
  16. Six Speed (finished 13th)
  17. Intrepido (finished 16th)

Just lucky?

By SeaFox • Score: 3 Thread

I’m curious how the 2016 platform managed to get it so right but everything since then has failed. Would be amusing if models are actually getting worse as they are hyped more in business.

How does AI do predicting lottery numbers?

By misnohmer • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Whoever thought AI somehow magically knows the future? This is silly. Sure, there is some information in horse racing that can help skew the statistics from purely random flat distribution, but come on, do we really think AI is all knowing of all future outcomes?

Not fair

By Sloppy • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

The LLMs weren’t trained on a story about who won. How TF is it supposed to predict it in advance? That’s not how LLMs work. Just train it on one more thing, a story about who won in 2026, and I’m sure you’ll see its accuracy go up.

Chinese Exports of Green Technologies Surged to Record Levels After Iran War Began

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot
“The war in Iran has sent oil-starved countries scrambling for fuel,” CNN reported this week. And many of those countries now want renewable fuels, the article points out, “leaving them turning to the renewables king of the planet: China.”
Chinese exports of solar technology, batteries and electric vehicles all reached record highs in March, according to energy think tank Ember, a sign that the historic oil supply shock is accelerating the adoption of clean energy around the world… A Thursday report from Ember said China exported 68 gigawatts of solar technology in March, surpassing the previous record set in August by 50%. Fifty countries set new records for Chinese solar imports, with the most significant growth coming from emerging markets in Asia and Africa hit hardest by the energy crisis, according to the think tank. “Fossil shocks are boosting the solar surge,” said Euan Graham, senior analyst at Ember, in the report. “Solar has already become the engine of the global economy, and now the current fossil fuel price shocks are taking it up a gear.”

Ember said exports of solar, batteries and EVs in total rose 70% in March year over year, according to Chinese customs data… China’s battery exports reached $10 billion in March, with particularly high growth rates in the European Union, Australia and India, Ember said. Uncertainty over when the Strait of Hormuz will reopen has spurred deeper regional anxieties about energy securi"ty, helping to hasten the transition to clean energy, analysts said.
The article notes how different countries are reacting to fuel

Thanks to Slashdot reader AleRunner for sharing the article.


Re:Making China Great Again.

By ArchieBunker • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Just like all those weapons of mass destruction in Iraq that mysteriously evaporated after we invaded.

Re:The new CATL batteries are wild

By saloomy • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
I was hesitant of the charge time fear, but having lives with an EV for 8 years (first Model X in 2018), I can say that the obsession with charge time is ridiculous unless you are a long haul trucker. My cars charge overnight, every night. I have a Tesla wall charger on every parking space in my garage, and my wife and I charge our cars to full, every night. I use a supercharger… 8 times a year? Seriously, how often do you drive 250+ miles a day? Even the Model 3’s standard range cars do that. It is such a better way to live where every day you have a “full tank of gas” when you turn on your car. Not everyone can afford the capital outlay for solar panels, but we did and it makes our drives effectively free. Seriously, the maintenance, the running expenses, has all been unbelievable. Stop squeezing every ounce of longevity from your batteries and just accept the fact that you MUST sleep at some point, which is a great time to charge up your cars.

Re:The new CATL batteries are wild

By thegarbz • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

This was always the bottleneck for a lot of people

Because people can’t separate the concept of a gas station with a vehicle. This has been a bottleneck for people who will eventually find themselves in a situation where they don’t actually ever fast charge their vehicle.

I was guilty of this. I thought EVs needed to charge in 10minutes. Then I got one, and I can count on one hand the number of times I’ve charged my EV at more than 40kW (the charger in my street and at work) in the past 2 years. I feel a bit silly for thinking that fast charging was an important metric, so do does everyone I know who got an EV.

Re:The new CATL batteries are wild

By AmiMoJo • Score: 5, Informative Thread

I hear that the infrastructure in the US is very bad, but then I see videos showing people using it for very long distance trips (driving in shifts) without issue.

Personally I just drive until the battery shows 20% and then pull into the next service area and use their chargers. Only happens a few times a year and doesn’t cost me any time because I’d stop for coffee and a snack anyway. Even a relatively modest (by modern standards) charge speed of 140kW is enough to refill the battery by the time I am done.

Re: Closet Environmentalist?

By Mr. Dollar Ton • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

the trump crime family is profiting nicely from their iranian entanglements.

those mysterious trades around every trump statement on the war, do you really think they are random?

then there are the Saudi payouts to inavnka’s cuckold, kushner.

etc etc.