Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Fiber Optic Cables Can Eavesdrop On Nearby Conversations
  2. NASA Keeps Track As Mexico City Sinks Into the Ground
  3. Does Fidelity’s Reorganization Signal the Beginning of the End for ‘Small-Team Agile’?
  4. Micron Ships Gigantic 245TB SSD
  5. New Linux ‘Dirty Frag’ Zero-Day Gives Root On All Major Distros
  6. Thousands of Vibe-Coded Apps Expose Corporate and Personal Data On the Open Web
  7. Pentagon Begins Releasing New Files On UFOs
  8. Apple, Intel Have Reached Preliminary Chip-Making Agreement
  9. AI Hard Drive Shortage Makes Archiving the Internet Harder
  10. Chrome Silently Installs a 4GB AI Model On Your Device Without Consent
  11. Cloudflare To Cut About 20% Workforce As AI Adoption Reshapes Operations
  12. First Segment of the Fehmarnbelt Tunnel Is In Place
  13. The Canvas Hack Is a New Kind of Ransomware Debacle
  14. Sam Altman Had a Bad Day In Court
  15. IMF Warns New AI Models Risk ‘Systemic’ Shock To Finance

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Fiber Optic Cables Can Eavesdrop On Nearby Conversations

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
sciencehabit shares a report from Science Magazine:
Cold War spies planted bugs in walls, lamps, and telephones. Now, scientists warn, the cables themselves could listen in. A fiber optic technique used to detect earthquakes can also pick up the faint vibrations of nearby speech, researchers reported this week here at the general assembly of the European Geosciences Union. Freely available artificial intelligence (AI) software turned the fiber optic data into intelligible, real-time transcripts. “Not many people realize that [fiber optic cables] can detect acoustic waves,” says Jack Lee Smith, a geophysicist at the University of Edinburgh who presented the result. “We show that in almost every case where you use these fibers, this could be a privacy concern.”

Fiber optics can pick up on sound through a technique called distributed acoustic sensing (DAS). Using a machine called an interrogator, researchers fire laser pulses down a cable and record the pattern of reflections coming back from tiny glass defects along the length of the fiber optic. When an earthquake’s seismic wave crosses a section of the fiber, it stretches and squeezes the defects, leading to shifts in the reflected light that researchers can use to build a picture of an earthquake. DAS essentially turns a fiber cable into a long chain of seismometers that can detect not only earthquakes, but also the rumblings of volcanoes, cars, and college marching bands. And although scientists set up dedicated fiber lines specifically for research, DAS can also be performed on “dark fiber” — unused strands in the web of fiber optics that runs through cities and across oceans, carrying the world’s internet traffic.

DAS can also be used to eavesdrop, the work of Smith and his colleagues shows. They conducted a field test using an existing DAS setup used to study coastal erosion. They set a speaker next to the cable and played pure tones, music, and speech. Human speech contains frequencies ranging from a few hundred to several thousand hertz. The low end of the range could be pulled out of the data “even without any preprocessing,” Smith says. “You can easily see acoustic waves.” Getting higher frequency speech took a bit of postprocessing, but it was possible. Dumping the data directly into Whisper, a free AI transcription tool, provided accurate real-time transcription. However, this technique worked only for coiled cables, exposed at the surface, at distances of up to 5 meters from the speaker. Burying the cable under just 20 centimeters of dirt was enough to muddy the speech. And straight cables — even exposed ones right next to the speaker — did not record speech well.

NASA Keeps Track As Mexico City Sinks Into the Ground

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from the Guardian:
Walking into Mexico City’s sprawling central Zocalo is a dizzying experience. At one end of the plaza, the capital’s cathedral, with its soaring spires, slumps in one direction. An attached church, known as the Metropolitan Sanctuary, tilts in the other. The nearby National Palace also seems off-kilter. The teetering of many of the capital’s historic buildings is the most visible sign of a phenomenon that has been ongoing for more than a century: Mexico City is sinking at an alarming rate. Now, the metropolis’s descent is being tracked in real time thanks to one of the most powerful radar systems ever launched into space. Known as Nisar, the satellite can detect minute changes in Earth’s surface, even through thick vegetation or cloud cover. “Nisar takes radar imaging observations of Earth to the next level,” said Marin Govorcin, a scientist at Nasa’s jet propulsion laboratory. “Nisar will see any change big or small that happens on Earth from week to week. No other imaging mission can claim this.”

Though not the first time that Mexico City’s sinking has been observed from space, the Nisar mission has provided a greater sense of how far the sinking spreads and how it changes across different types of land than any other space-based sensor. It has also been able to penetrate areas on the outskirts of the city that were previously challenging to study because of the complex terrain. The implications of the imagery extend far beyond the Mexican capital. “This study of Mexico City speaks to the realm of possibilities that will open up thanks to the Nisar system,” said Dario Solano-Rojas, an engineer at the National Autonomous University of Mexico (Unam). “And not just for sinking cities but also for studying volcanoes, for studying the deformation associated with earthquakes, for studying landslides.” According to Nasa, the technology is also capable of monitoring the climate crisis, glacier sliding, agricultural productivity, soil moisture, forestry, coastal flooding and more.
The Nisar system found that some parts of the city are dropping by more than 2cm a month. “First documented in 1925, the city’s sinking is a result of centuries of exploitation of the groundwater,” the report says. “Because Mexico City and its surrounds were built on an ancient lake bed, the soil beneath the city is extremely soft. When water is pumped out of the aquifer below, this clay-like earth compacts, resulting in a city that is quietly sinking.”
The crisis is also self-reinforcing: as the city sinks, aging pipes crack and leak, causing Mexico City to lose an estimated 40% of its water, even as drought and climate change make supplies more fragile.

Incredible Foolishness

By gurps_npc • Score: 3 Thread

They created the problem by pumping out the ground water. It started out as a lake, they drained the lake and built a city on the dried out lake bed. Then they pumped water out from the ground to satisfy the thirst of the people that moved into the lake. Worse, they are STILL pumping out the water - and will do so until it is gone.

People have been doing this kind of sillyness for a very long time, and probably will do so long into the future. Miami is the opposite problem - they built it on a flood zone that keeps getting more and more water.

Not that hard to do a little bit of thinking before you screw over your grand children.

Entirely Credible Foolishness

By T34L • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

I find it incredible that you’re struggling with that! Can’t you like, for a single moment, try see things through the perspective of the overwhelming majority of people who’ve lived in that city through history, who had entirely different day to day concerns than a potential structural damage to a city that was eventually gonna become a place unlike anything they could even imagine through the centuries that process has been happening for?

Most people through history of the place never weighed the choice of contributing to overpopulating a structurally vulnerable lake bed because their day to day concerns were “Where will I get my food/water today?”, and quite often had to face moral dilemmas way more painful than “The city will get a bit lumpy several hundred years into the future”. Not to mention that for the longest time, they didn’t even have any reason to expect those issues; we’re literally still coming up with methods of measuring the effect, and it turns out to be pretty damn difficult without spinning some thinking rocks around the planet.

I’d argue that the vast majority of the contributors to Mexico City’s sinking problem through history did their part with far less information on impact of their actions and far fewer alternatives than the median modern human currently driving the climatic collapse of the planet has now, and yet, that far worse catastrophe is somehow something many people don’t just decide to ignore, but outright argue is a mistake to invest effort against or pay any mind to.

Does Fidelity’s Reorganization Signal the Beginning of the End for ‘Small-Team Agile’?

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Longtime Slashdot reader cellocgw writes:
Hiding inside another layoff report, Fidelity is reorganizing: “The changes are aimed at moving the teams away from an ‘agile’ makeup — comprising smaller, siloed squads — and toward larger teams built to move faster on projects.” OMG, as they say: “Sudden outbreak of common sense.”
According to the Boston Globe, Fidelity is cutting about 1,000 jobs even as it plans to hire roughly 5,300 new workers, many of them early-career engineers. Half of the 3,300 new workers hired this year “will be in tech or product-related roles,” the report says, noting that “about 2,000 of those jobs are currently open, and 400 of them are in tech/product-delivery.”
“The company also plans to add almost 2,000 new early-career workers, with the goal of making the tech and product-delivery teams more hands-on. In all, that means roughly 5,300 new jobs in the pipeline for Fidelity.” The company says AI isn’t driving the shift; as cellocgw noted, it’s about moving toward larger teams that Fidelity says can move faster on priority projects.

The financial services firm also reported a strong 2025 under CEO Abigail Johnson, with managed assets rising 19% from 2024 to $7.1 trillion and revenue climbing 15% to $37.7 billion. “Throughout the company’s history, our investments in technology have fueled our growth and customer service capabilities,” Johnson wrote in a letter (PDF) included in the company’s annual report. “We will continue to prioritize technology initiatives that help us advance digital capabilities, simplify our technology ecosystem, and protect the firm and our customers.”

One behemoth isn’t a trend

By Himmy32 • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

As much as Agile is the perennial punching bag that many would celebrate dying, reading too much on financial behemoth as an industry trend seems silly.

And call me skeptical on current news like this being anything but creative storytelling exercise on the reason for staff reductions.

Also could use a different “cooler” finance company as trend like Coinbase with microteams with Project Managers with AI agents doing the coding, oh wait they they are cutting staff too…

Depends on your goals, I guess.

By Petersko • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Agile teams are a great way to waste small amounts of money quickly. But if you want to waste money in vast amounts on an enterprise scale, they aren’t the way to go. Throwing huge teams at a problem is fantastic by comparison. It drives up burn rate, drives down efficiency, and extends timelines while claiming the opposite. Small teams cannot compete.

Tongue only partially in cheek… I watched a team of hundreds of local and remote workers burn $400M in a catastrophic waterfall grand attempt and fail completely. The worst agile failure I witnessed burned $4.5M before the plug was pulled.

Oh, please, not again.

By Qbertino • Score: 3 Thread

First of all, the singular term is “agility” not “agile”. Second of all, agility isn’t a means, it’s the end. The actual goal. And “agile software development” is a thing and will remain a thing in teams and “projects” where it fits and makes sense. Those are scenarios with experienced teams booked on a well-seasoned and under control stack with which every team-member has solid experience to basically take on any task in the scope of the project.

Agile software development is the _solution_ to the problem of clients not knowing what they want and developing a piece of software that isn’t military, medical, space, aeronautic, nuclear, mission-critical embedded or some other hardcore stuff. This is why agile software development is most often used in web development and generic user-facing software for vertical markets. Because that’s precisely where you find customers who are usually overwelmed with formulating the requirements of a piece of software to be programmed.

And no, it’s not at an “end” and no, it’s not “dead”. Perhaps the fad with dimwitts has died and they’ve moved on to another new buzzword, but that would be a good thing.

Agility or Agile Software Development is still alive an well for anyone actually aware what those terms really mean. See the original Manifesto for Agile Software Development for further details.

Congratiulations, you are now ahead of 99% of the buzzword crowd. You’re welcome.

Re:Depends on your goals, I guess.

By Firethorn • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

I looked at a waterfall project where the mayor ended up spending $3M to have an audit done on the current state of a project that was way behind on time and way over budget, only for them to come back and say that it’d be cheaper to burn all the effort to date and start fresh.

Dissing Agile

By cowdung • Score: 3 Thread

People diss agile today because they don’t remember how it was before Agile, and how teams that actually succeeded kinda sorta did something like Agile. Agile wasn’t adopted by software companies because it was some new religion. It was often adopted because software companies were already “cheating” and Agile just set a framework that could make it work and not feel like cheating anymore.

That being said, successful companies cheat in Agile too.

What’s going to replace Agile is some methodology where the new AI tools are going to interconnect to make the team much more productive.

Fidelity hiring 5000 juniors to replace their 1000 seniors .. hmm.. frankly that’s not going to work.
Sounds like an idea some MBA came up with to “save money”.

Micron Ships Gigantic 245TB SSD

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
BrianFagioli writes:
Micron says it is now shipping the world’s highest-capacity commercially available SSD, and the numbers are honestly hard to wrap your head around. The new Micron 6600 ION packs 245TB into a single drive and is aimed squarely at AI infrastructure, hyperscalers, and cloud providers dealing with exploding data growth. According to the company, the SSD can reduce rack counts by 82 percent compared to HDD deployments offering similar raw capacity, while also cutting power usage and cooling requirements. Micron says the drive tops out at roughly 30W, which it claims is about half the power draw of comparable hard drive setups.

The announcement also feels like another warning sign for spinning disks in the enterprise. Hard drives still dominate bulk storage because of lower cost per terabyte, but SSD capacities keep climbing into territory that used to belong exclusively to HDDs. Micron is also touting major performance gains, claiming up to 84 times better energy efficiency for AI workloads and dramatically lower latency versus HDD-based systems. While nobody is dropping one of these into a home NAS anytime soon, the idea of a quarter petabyte on a single SSD no longer sounds like science fiction.

Wanna bet?

By evslin • Score: 3 Thread

> While nobody is dropping one of these into a home NAS anytime soon, the idea of a quarter petabyte on a single SSD no longer sounds like science fiction.

You’re right, I won’t be dropping one of these into my NAS. That would make it a single point of failure, and we can’t have that. I’ll need three of them.

Re:2TB SSD

By fahrbot-bot • Score: 5, Informative Thread

> What are normal people supposed to do?

It looks like a omen to take up farming.

Before or after 30% of the world’s fertilizer shipments resume through the Strait of Hormuz and prices come down? Noting that ocean transit times are several weeks to months.

Strait of Hormuz Crisis: Why Fertilizer Relief is Years Away for U.S. Farmers

Re:2TB SSD

By Luckyo • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Demand software developers start caring about memory print of their software again. Both in RAM and storage.

Unironically. We’ve lived out at least a decade and a half of “this software stack is utterly unoptimized garbage” “who cares, just slap bigger system requirements. We’re not spending money on optimizing something that doesn’t matter to anyone since hardware is advancing so fast”.

It’s good that every decade or so we get a memory and storage crunch and developers actually have to rediscover things like better compression algorithms and methods, proper garbage collection, and general software optimization.

Seriously, have you seen the size requirements of modern games? Have you seen the retarded chugging of modern office software running win11 on 8GB RAM machines when they have to actually start swapping? Have you experienced the joys of Chrome and all the memes about it being a ramvore?

What in the actual fuck are those tabs doing eating gigabytes of RAM? And why in the fuck are most Chromium based browser installs now almost a gig of storage?

You could do the same things a decade and a half ago on 4 gigs RAM and tiny SSDs that were less than one gigabyte and the system flew and most things except the porn torrents could be stored on it.

And then you consider “ok, what did we actually get for that insane increase in system demands?”

Built in always on spyware. Slightly redesigned UI according to the latest fashion trends. A few arcane additional features barely anyone uses. Games with “that unreal look” that look worse than unreal games a decade ago. And “modern” webpages that essentially ask you one question: “Would you like scrips with those scripts so you can enjoy scripts while you’re enjoying scripts”.

While reading a text based news article.

Just kidding. They don’t ask.

Wouldn’t buy

By LostMyBeaver • Score: 3 Thread
I am the specific target audience for these drives.

And … they are a TERRIBLE idea.

Assume PCIex4 v5.0 for the interface. That’s a theoretical 15.75GB/sec. To read this drive sequentially would take 4.25 hours.

This is so slow it’s absolutely useless for AI. Assume for a moment I loaded 8 of these into a 1u chassis. 800Gb XDR InfiniBand would be too slow, a double link would work. But you would be better off building half-U trays with four drives and an 800Gb link.

That said, let’s say you had half a rack of that. That would be 48x245TB or about 12PB. And remember this is performance storage, not reliable storage. Everything here should be treated as entirely volatile… it’s just cheap/slow RAM, it’s not bad.

I think overall, I would architect a similar system on 64TB sleds because with the exception of rack space and power (and the drives use no power next to GPUs), 64TB drives destroy 245TB drives in every way.

Once we hit PCIe v9.0 or so and 4Tb Ethernet or InfiniBand, then 245TB will start making sense.

If Micron wanted a serious product, they would have dropped U.2 in favor of Ethernet or InfiniBand.

New Linux ‘Dirty Frag’ Zero-Day Gives Root On All Major Distros

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
mrspoonsi shares a report:
Dirty Frag is a vulnerability class, first discovered and reported by Hyunwoo Kim (@v4bel), that can obtain root privileges on major Linux distributions by chaining the xfrm-ESP Page-Cache Write vulnerability and the RxRPC Page-Cache Write vulnerability. Dirty Frag extends the bug class to which Dirty Pipe and Copy Fail belong. Because it is a deterministic logic bug that does not depend on a timing window, no race condition is required, the kernel does not panic when the exploit fails, and the success rate is very high. Because the embargo has been broken, no patch or CVE currently exists.
“As with the previous Copy Fail vulnerability, Dirty Frag likewise allows immediate root privilege escalation on all major distributions, and it chains two separate vulnerabilities,” Kim said. Detailed technical information can be found here.

BleepingComputer notes that the two vulnerabilities chained by Dirty Frag are “now tracked under the following CVE IDs: the xfrm-ESP one was assigned CVE-2026-43284, and the RxRPC isye is now CVE-2026-43500.”

Embargo intrigue

By Himmy32 • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

There’s a little more intrigue here on the breaking of the embargo. Basically the bugs were responsibly reported and the finders helped with writing the patch under embargo. Then when the patch commit dropped, someone instantly figured out that it was the same class of bug as Copy Fail. And then someone then wrote new exploit code for the bug before the patch worked it’s way through. No one improperly leaked something, but watching new patches for previous exploits was quicker than the patch could work it’s way through the system.

Which leaves us where we are with Hyunwoo Kim releasing the original exploit code early and a patch that seems to have made it into the kernel, but without downstream distro’s having released their patches.

Here’s the link to the mitigation for anyone wanting to deal with it before their distro drops their patch. Noting that the mitigation will break IPsec VPNs and AFS distributed network file systems.

Re:On your mark, get set… GO!

By 93 Escort Wagon • Score: 4, Informative Thread

AlmaLinux has already patched it.

Re:how ironic!

By Himmy32 • Score: 4, Informative Thread

According to Alma Foundation that is the reserved CVE number but it’s pending publication.

Probably because it was released before the embargo was supposed to be lifted.

Re:Don’t care

By Himmy32 • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Interesting which distro? Is it running a pre-mainline kernel?

The embargo was broken yesterday 6:09PM UTC and the Linux kernel patch was released today at 6:42 AM UTC.

Android

By OrangAsm • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
What happens if you run the exploit on Android?

Thousands of Vibe-Coded Apps Expose Corporate and Personal Data On the Open Web

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Wired:
Security researcher Dor Zvi and his team at the cybersecurity firm he cofounded, RedAccess, analyzed thousands of vibe-coded web applications created using the AI software development tools Lovable, Replit, Base44, and Netlify and found more than 5,000 of them that had virtually no security or authentication of any kind. Many of these web apps allowed anyone who merely finds their web URL to access the apps and their data. Others had only trivial barriers to that access, such as requiring that a visitor sign in with any email address. Around 40 percent of the apps exposed sensitive data, Zvi says, including medical information, financial data, corporate presentations, and strategy documents, as well as detailed logs of customer conversations with chatbots.

“The end result is that organizations are actually leaking private data through vibe-coding applications,” says Zvi. “This is one of the biggest events ever where people are exposing corporate or other sensitive information to anyone in the world.” Zvi says RedAccess’ scouring for vulnerable web apps was surprisingly easy. Lovable, Replit, Base44, and Netlify all allow users to host their web apps on those AI companies’ own domains, rather than the users’. So the researchers used straightforward Google and Bing searches for those AI companies’ domains combined with other search terms to identify thousands of apps that had been vibe coded with the companies’ tools.

Of the 5,000 AI-coded apps that Zvi says were left publicly accessible to anyone who simply typed their URLs into a browser, he found close to 2,000 that, upon closer inspection, seemed to reveal private data: Screenshots of web apps he shared with WIRED — several of which WIRED verified were still online and exposed — showed what appeared to be a hospital’s work assignments with the personally identifiable information of doctors, a company’s detailed ad purchasing information, what appeared to be another firm’s go-to-market strategy presentation, a retailer’s full logs of its chatbot’s conversations with customers, including the customers’ full names and contact information, a shipping firm’s cargo records, and assorted sales and financial records from a variety of other companies. In some cases, Zvi says, he found that the exposed apps would have allowed him to gain administrative privileges over systems and even remove other administrators. In the case of Lovable, Zvi says he also found numerous examples of phishing sites that impersonated major corporations, including Bank of America, Costco, FedEx, Trader Joe’s, and McDonald’s, that appeared to have been created with the AI coding tool and hosted on Lovable’s domain.
“Anyone from your company at any moment can generate an app, and this is not going through any development cycle or any security check,” Zvi says. “People can just start using it in production without asking anyone. And they do.”

Not a vibe-coding problem

By Local ID10T • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

This problem is not from vibe-coding. It is from a lack of design.

Real developers spend more time designing their programs than they spend coding them. For a reason.

Visual basic 6 all over

By Bad Ad • Score: 3 Thread
History is repeating, it’s like vb6 all over again, but even worse/easier.

Re:Vibe coding was never for production code

By Junta • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Problem for everyone is that mindset does not save cost/produce value.

Even when part of the AI companies try to show utility honestly, they get drowned out by their own executives bulldozing the nuance aside and pretending it is just a magical replacement for software developers.

Pentagon Begins Releasing New Files On UFOs

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
The Pentagon has begun releasing new UFO/UAP files through a newly launched public website, starting with 162 documents from agencies including the FBI, State Department, NASA, and others. Officials say more files will be released on a rolling basis. The Associated Press reports:
The Pentagon has begun releasing new files on UFOs, saying members of the public can draw their own conclusions on “unidentified anomalous phenomena” like an object that a drone pilot says shone a bright light in the sky and then vanished. It said in a post on X on Friday that while past administrations sought to discredit or dissuade the American people, President Donald Trump “is focused on providing maximum transparency to the public, who can ultimately make up their own minds about the information contained in these files.” It said additional documents will be released on a rolling basis.

Besides the Pentagon, the effort is led by the White House, the director of national intelligence, the Energy Department, NASA and the FBI. A newly unveiled website housing the documents on unidentified anomalous phenomena, or UAPs, has a decidedly retro feel, with black-and-white military imagery of flying objects displayed prominently on the page, with statements displayed in typewriter-like font. The first release includes 162 files, such as old State Department cables, FBI documents and transcripts from NASA of crewed flights into space.

One document details an FBI interview with someone identified as a drone pilot who, in September 2023, reported seeing a “linear object” with a light bright enough to “see bands within the light” in the sky. “The object was visible for five to ten seconds and then the light went out and the object vanished,” according to the FBI interview. Another file is a NASA photograph from the Apollo 17 mission in 1972, showing three dots in a triangular formation. The Pentagon says in an accompanying caption that “there is no consensus about the nature of the anomaly” but that a new, preliminary analysis indicated that it could be a “physical object.”

wrong files bro

By Anonymous Coward • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

“focused on providing maximum transparency to the public” indeed

public can draw their own conclusions

By nospam007 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

No Epstein anywhere, I gather.

Release the UFO Files

By Local ID10T • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

(… and forget the EPSTEIN Files)

Look at these amazing UFO files!!!!

By umopapisdn69 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

And argue about them vehemently!

Pay no attention to Iran. Or gas prices. Or food or rent prices. Or thugs disappearing foreigners off the street. Or Epstein. Or . . .

Re: Gun cameras have a different role

By flyingfsck • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Hmm, I used to build military observation systems and the few things I looked at are obvious lens reflections making dots that, if you try to chase them, keep moving as you turn. With complex lens systems, you can get multiple dots. I have even seen a big spot caused by my aircraft window when flying over clouds, so the effect is not limited to a camera system - an Airbus A320 window will also do!

Apple, Intel Have Reached Preliminary Chip-Making Agreement

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Apple and Intel have reportedly reached a preliminary agreement (paywalled; alternative source) for Intel to manufacture some chips used in Apple devices, after more than a year of talks and pressure from the Trump administration. It’s still unclear which Apple products would use Intel-made chips, but the deal would mark a major potential win for Intel’s foundry ambitions and give Apple another manufacturing option beyond TSMC.

Second sourcing, multiple suppliers, etc.

By drnb • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

How great is it that Trump requires Apple to do business with Intel

Intel is one of the top three semiconductor manufacturers in the world. If a company wants to practice the sound engineering principle of second sourcing they are a top choice.

Please, please, please let it be Apple’s main processors.

TSMC has a high volume process lead over Intel. Apple will probably use Intel for older CPUs going into lower end machines and devices.

Plus, CPUs are not the only chips that Apple needs. Not all chips need the latest process.

Finally, TSMC is heavily in demand so moving some of Apple’s lower end orders to Intel help to make sure the higher end orders get fulfilled on time.

A hysterical black eye to Intel and a kick in the balls to Apple fanboys.

Not at all. Apple used Intel CPUs for 15 years. The great “PC vs Mac” debate is about the user experience, not the hardware architecture of the CPU behind it, and certainly not what foundry a CPU comes from.

Apple is quite pragmatic about who it does business with. Apple partnered with IBM (and Motorola) to produce the PowerPC CPUs it had used prior to Intel CPUs. The marketting and evangelism departments may like to brand IBM and Intel as enemies, but over on the engineering and manufacturing side they do engineering not religious dogma.

AI Hard Drive Shortage Makes Archiving the Internet Harder

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from 404 Media:
Skyrocketing hard drive and storage costs caused by the AI data center boom are making it more expensive and more difficult for digital archivists, academics, Wikipedia, and hobby data hoarders to save data and archive the internet. Specific drives favored by some high profile organizations like the Internet Archive have become far more expensive or are difficult to find at all, archivists said. Over the last several months, prices for both consumer level and enterprise solid state drives, hard drives, and other types of storage have skyrocketed. As an example, a 2TB external Samsung SSD I purchased last fall for $159 now costs $575. PC Part Picker, a website that tracks the average price of different types of drives, shows a universal increase in storage prices starting in about October of last year. Prices of many of the drives it tracks have doubled or increased by more than 150 percent, and at some stores SSDs and hard drives are simply sold out. There is now even a secondary market for some SSDs, with people scalping them on eBay and elsewhere.

Brewster Kahle, founder of the Internet Archive and the Wayback Machine, the most important archiving projects in the history of the internet, told 404 Media that the skyrocketing costs of storage is “a very real issue costing us time and money.” “We have found that the preferred 28-30TB drives are just not available or at very high price,” Kahle said. “We gather over 100 terabytes of new materials each day, and we have over 210 Petabytes of materials already archived on machines that need continuous upgrades and maintenance, so we need to constantly get new hard drives.” “We are fortunate to have an active community that donates to the Archive, and we are also looking for help from hard drive manufacturers in these difficult times. We are always looking for more help,” he added. “So far we have ways to work around these shortages, but it is a very real issue causing us time and money.”

The Wikimedia Foundation, which runs Wikipedia and various other projects, including Wikimedia Commons, an open repository of royalty free media, told 404 Media that the cost of storage has become a concern for the foundation’s projects as well. “With over 65 million articles on Wikipedia alone, access to server and storage capacity is vital to us. We’ve certainly seen price increases since the end of 2025. These price increases are of concern to us, as with every other player in the industry. We see the primary impact in the purchase of memory and hard drives but also in terms of lead times on server deliveries and our capacity to place future orders,” a Wikimedia Foundation spokesperson told us. “The Wikimedia Foundation is a non-profit, and as such how we allocate budget is very carefully considered. We maintain our own data centers to serve our users from all over the world. We’re putting workarounds in place where we can, mainly involving being smart with how we prioritize investment in hardware, building in flexibility as well as extending the life of existing hardware where possible.”

Western Digital, one of the largest manufacturers of hard drives and other storage systems, said that it has essentially sold out of its 2026 inventory to enterprise clients, many of which run data centers. Micron, which made RAM and SSDs under the brand name Crucial, has exited the consumer market altogether because “AI-driven growth in the data center has led to a surge in demand for memory and storage. Micron has made the difficult decision to exit the Crucial consumer business in order to improve supply and support for our larger, strategic customers in faster-growing segments.”

SSDs as investment

By SpinyNorman • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

> a 2TB external Samsung SSD I purchased last fall for $159 now costs $575

I can confirm - I’ve got a brand new Samsung 870 EVO 2TB drive sitting on my desk that I bought in 10-2022 for $176, and have never got around to installing.

Same drive is now $676 on Amazon!

I won’t forget

By awwshit • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Dear AI companies, I won’t forget how you fucked our entire industry for a long time. I won’t forget how you forced scarcity and high prices. I won’t forget that I need to double-check everything that your half-assed solution pukes out. I won’t forget that you set everything on fire so you could try to profit.

Re:This whole AI thing is ridiculous

By dfghjk • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

“Then we’ll have an oversupply of components instead of a shortage.”

No, there isn’t a free market. Corporate interests want ALL of supply so you don’t get any. That changes only when corporations say it changes, and specifically when VC funding dictates those changes. You assume brainpower not demonstrated to exist, you compete against privilege and you are guaranteed to lose.

“The amount of spend is ludicrous and unrealistic for future needs”

Because billionaires compete to own the future without knowledge or understanding of what the future is. They’re trying to buy up all supply on speculation. Musk rents out capacity he bought on speculation, what matters is that he owns the capacity not that he uses it.

One breakthrough on AI computing requirements could make everything known today obsolete, but we can take for granted that billionaires will know that before anyone else. It’s a rigged game. Billionaires will own ALL computing power yet demand that the public pay for all the electrical infrastructure necessary to power it. We share the costs and they make the profits. The Sam Walton way.

Our archive is also struggling

By Arrogant-Bastard • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
I’ve spent most of the past decade working (for free) on an archiving project for a nonprofit organization. This is a labor of love for me: it’s a chance to use a lifetime of technical skills to help preserve the past for the future. I’ve put in every spare minute that I can, and have given up most other things in my life to do so. I have to: there isn’t anyone else with the requisite skill set to do this work for free, and the organization certainly can’t afford to pay anybody.

The AI companies have created two massive problems for us. The first is their web scraping, which is way beyond abusive: it’s an attack. Yes, YES, I know about all the techniques to block it and I’ve deployed a bunch of them, but every minute spent doing that is a minute not spent doing actual archiving work. And even if I managed to blunt most of these attacks, at least one will get through, and they’ll steal everything we’ve posted (for free) and use it (for profit), against our terms of service and against the express wishes of the people who donated materials to us…which is making it vastly harder to convince donors to help us.

The second is the topic of this discussion: disk drives. We don’t need the biggest and the fastest, but we need a lot of them because we’re maintaining replicas of the archive in geographically distributed locations. And like everyone else, we either can’t find them or we can’t afford them. I’ve been using eBay and Craigslist and I’ve even been going to estate states to try to pick up used external USB/firewire drives and old desktop PCs so that I can pull the disks and hope they test okay. Again: every minute spent doing that is a minute not doing actual archiving work. (Also: because some of these disks have a lot of hours on them, I have to consider probable remaining lifetimes and account for that.)

This is maddening and heartbreaking at the same time. And the thing is: I’ve spent a lot of time interacting with other people in this space: GLAM (galleries, libraries, archives, museums). Everybody has this problem. All of these people, who definitely aren’t doing their jobs because of the lavish pay and spectacular benefits but because they appreciate and love the cultural area(s) they’re in, are all struggling. And none of these institutions have the money to truly address the situation: they’re all underfunded because they’ve always been underfunded.

TL;DR: this is cultural vandalism conducted by billionaires who are willing to burn the entire world down for money and power.

nothing but another price gouge…

By Jayhawk0123 • Score: 3 Thread

the drives you and i buy are consumer grade bs that is still produced at same rates as in previous years… there is no real “shortage” or supply crunch of consumer grade drives… not as if they re-fabbed their production lines to build enterprise drives… as for memory costs going up, yeah… it’s a small portion of the actual cost of the drives… so even if that doubles… the impact on the cost of the drive is a rounding error.

This is another bullshit price gouge of consumers…

Chrome Silently Installs a 4GB AI Model On Your Device Without Consent

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Longtime Slashdot reader couchslug shares a report from That Privacy Guy’s Alexander Hanff:
Two weeks ago I wrote about Anthropic silently registering a Native Messaging bridge in seven Chromium-based browsers on every machine where Claude Desktop was installed. The pattern was: install on user launch of product A, write configuration into the user’s installs of products B, C, D, E, F, G, H without asking. Reach across vendor trust boundaries. No consent dialog. No opt-out UI. Re-installs itself if the user removes it manually, every time Claude Desktop is launched. This week I discovered the same pattern, executed by Google.

Google Chrome is reaching into users’ machines and writing a 4GB on-device AI model file to disk without asking. The file is named weights.bin. It lives in OptGuideOnDeviceModel. It is the weights for Gemini Nano, Google’s on-device LLM. Chrome did not ask. Chrome does not surface it. If the user deletes it, Chrome re-downloads it. The legal analysis is the same one I gave for the Anthropic case. The environmental analysis is new. At Chrome’s scale, the climate bill for one model push, paid in atmospheric CO2 by the entire planet, is between six thousand and sixty thousand tons of CO2-equivalent emissions, depending on how many devices receive the push. That is the environmental cost of one company unilaterally deciding that two billion peoples’ default browser will mass-distribute a 4GB binary they did not request.

Re:I installed software…

By Smidge204 • Score: 5, Informative Thread

You install software X, but without asking you software X silently installs additional software Y that is not necessary for software X to function, and if you try to remove software Y it gets re-installed without asking or alerting you.

We’d call that a trojan malware in any other context.
=Smidge=

Re:What A Whiny Little Bitch

By ArchieBunker • Score: 5, Funny Thread

I think we found the dev behind this.

What is this “gemeni”

By rossdee • Score: 5, Funny Thread

I don’t know, I was born in October, so I use the LibreWolf browser, not Chrome.

Re:Consent? It’s a file copy

By Burdell • Score: 5, Informative Thread

When you install software, you can see how big it is, in some OSes/installers you are prompted if that’s okay, if you want to enable/disable optional bits, etc. When you install Chrome, it’s a certain size to get a web browser.

However, at some indeterminate point later, when you RUN Chrome, it downloads a chunk of data (that’s not a browser) that’s as big as (or bigger than) the initial browser install. It does this per user on a multi-user system. It does it with no prompting or notification. For a home user, this could be annoying (I discovered this right when it started last fall because it exploded my backups); for a corporate (or especially government) environment, this is unacceptable behavior.

This would be like installing Solitaire, and while you’re playing it installs Excel in the background.

Re:I installed software…

By Auchmithie • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Not true. I found the file, having not installed the Gemini extension.

I disabled the flag #optimization-guide-on-device-model then deleted the weights file. So far the flag has stayed disabled, but the file has been reloaded.

This is not installing software. It is force-feeding software not asked for, not wanted and in fact totally repudiated.

Cloudflare To Cut About 20% Workforce As AI Adoption Reshapes Operations

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Cloudflare plans to cut about 20% of its workforce, or more than 1,100 employees, as it restructures around an “agentic AI-first operating model.” Reuters reports:
Cloudflare CEO Matthew Prince and co-founder Michelle Zatlyn said in a message to employees that the company was reimagining every team and function to operate in what they described as an agentic AI era. Cloudflare said the job cuts reflect a redesign of internal processes and roles, rather than a response to employee performance or short-term cost pressures. The company added that its own use of AI has increased more than sixfold over the past three months, prompting major changes in how teams operate.

Fraud! No one wants same revenue 20% cheaper!

By Somervillain • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
No, like everyone else, Cloudflare simply overhired in the past and forsees reduced revenue opportunity in the future…probably due to industrial trends as well as macroeconomic pressures, like tariffs, increased energy costs, wars, etc. Or they simply overhired in the past. However, they are choosing to commit fraud to investors, like most companies and link it to AI instead of their diminished future prospects and past management choices (which I wouldn’t call mismanagement…better to hire for potential opportunity and correct when you’re mistaken…but investors may disagree)

Does AI reduce labor need? If you use it, you’d know that’s not the case. Claude isn’t cause a 20% efficiency gain across an organization. If your programmers didn’t suck, they would barely notice. The majority of a decent programmer’s time is spent finding edge cases, negotiating requirements, validation, etc. My time writing Java is about 5% of my day…because I know how to do it well and can do it very quickly. The rest of the time, I am meeting with stakeholders, validating my work, finding edge cases, troubleshooting error reports, etc.

The “how?” is the easiest question, the only one an AI can help with. The “what?” (am I doing) and “why?” are the huge costs.

However, let’s say I’m wrong…Claude is causing a greater than 20% reduction in time needed. Why isn’t CloudFlare using their 10x AI-fueled developers to crush their massive competitors? Akamai and Fastly are huge....So cloudflare is happy with their current marketshare and wants to maintain it for 20% lower cost?....vs crushing all competition? I call bullshit.

We are in a recession

By rsilvergun • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
And we are just not allowed to talk about it because 90% of the media is owned by billionaires and they got huge huge tax cuts and tons of deregulation from the current administration and the current administration wants to keep up the illusion.

What’s weird is how many people are participating in the illusion. The administration polls at around 40% overall approval rating despite everything going on and despite the fact that individually the policies are extremely unpopular.

Eventually reality comes calling but if they can hold it together until after the midterms once you cast your vote that’s it you don’t get any take backs. The American system makes it basically impossible to undo the damage from a stupid vote until the next election which for a senator takes 6 years.

And again all you have to do is confuse people for about 2 to 4 weeks leading up to an election and you’re all set you can keep screwing them over.

I don’t know how you solve that. We need to be teaching critical thinking in schools but parents don’t like that because they don’t like it when Johnny comes home and starts asking questions about their religion or political beliefs or whatever stupid ideas they have in their head. People want their kids to be smart enough to get a job but not so smart they can no longer relate to them or agree with them. So they purposely stunt their growth. Like how in that book brave New world the people destined to simple do repetitive labor were given chemicals in the womb to limit their intelligence…

Wait for the rug-pull

By crmarvin42 • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
I wonder what they will do when the cost of AI increases?

We all know that AI companies are selling their services at a loss. Often on a cost-of-compute- basis, but even more so when you factor in model training costs incurred with investor cash. And that is even before we account for how the shortages of relevant hardware and server space for running all of this are driving up the costs of memory, chips, etc. Or the fact that the energy crisis is only getting started, and will impact literally every part of the value chain for addressing the current and future demand.

Most of the sunk costs to date, have been funded with investor cash, but those investors are going to start wanting to get paid back with a strong multiple of their investments to date. That means, as companies reorganize around the use of AI - at the current prices - they are creating a potential nightmare of cost forecasting and control when the AI vendors all decide it is time to start generating that pay-back by sticking the screws to their customers. This is CLASSIC ENSHITIFICATION.

First Segment of the Fehmarnbelt Tunnel Is In Place

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Longtime Slashdot reader Qbertino writes:
The Fehrmarnbelt tunnel is a European construction megaproject building a tunnel between Denmark and Germany, crossing the Fehmarnbelt in the Baltic sea. The first segment of the tunnel has now successfully been placed in its designated spot. This is a yet-unseen, next-level engineering feat achieved by the Danish Sund & Baelt construction company. It took 14 hours and used a massive pontoon ship built specifically for this project.

The tunnel segments are 217 meters long, weigh more than 73,000 metric tons, and have to be placed within a tolerance of 3 mm. The tunnel will eventually consist of 89 of these segments, be 18 km long, and connect the Danish city of Rodby with the German island Fehmarn through five individual tunnel tubes: two for cars, two for trains, and one rescue and maintenance tunnel. Crossing time will be reduced from a 45-minute ferry crossing to seven minutes by train or 10 minutes by car, and cut the travel time between the German city of Hamburg and the Danish capital, Copenhagen, down to 2.5 hours. The project’s planned completion is set for the year 2029. German news Tagesschau has some details and a neat animation, while further details are available from the German tech news site Heise.

Re:Meanwhile

By jacks smirking reven • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The difference between one team (Biden’s term and Harris’ alternate future) and the current term absolutely destroys this bad faith both sides argument. You can’t claim to be upset about an “oligarchy class” when one side clearly is the oligarchical one and you supported it.

You notice how this style of comment is all the more common now that it’s crystal fucking clear how much worse one team is than the other? Almost like folks are coping with the fact they backed the wrong horse and they may have to face the fact that the signs were all there, that all the people they scoffed at while they pulled the hammer for Trump because “Harris had a weird laugh” were actually right and things are actually worse than that.

Re:Hell hath frozen over!

By Pseudonymous Powers • Score: 5, Funny Thread

“The tunnel segments are 217 meters (two football fields) long, weigh more than 73,000 metric tons (slightly more than more than 73,000 REAL tons), and have to be placed within a tolerance of 3 mm (0 inches).”

Fixed. Thank you for bringing this oversight to our attention. Note, however, that this still lacks an analogy to liken this tunnel-for-cars to an actual car somehow.

Re:Meanwhile

By smooth wombat • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

There was no issue until Israel drug the U.S. by the nose into a war it can’t win.

Remind everyone again who it is that keeps attacking its neighbors claiming “self defense” then whines it’s the victim? Or who has been saying another country is “two weeks away” from nuclear weapons for the past 40 years?

Re:Meanwhile

By jacks smirking reven • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Look I’m not here to say Democrats are faultless or not in need of improvement but the difference today is quite stark. Sure both “support military funding” but 1. that issue is still broadly popular with the electorate, 2. the US will always have a need for a large military because as we are seeing when the US starts to withdraw from the world stage the world gets more chaotic and 3. scale matters, there’s no world where a Harris admin is asking for a $1.5T military budget, no world where she is turning so much more support to the new MiC (Palantir, Anduril, etc) and no world where she is handing billions in military contracts to her own family like Trump is.

And as much as I don’t like how Bush v Gore went down 26 years ago was a far, far, far different world politically. Should the dems have said “fuck the SC” and pushed more for a statewide recount? Maybe but that’s hindsight 20/20 stuff. W Bush was not Trump and back then both parties were still broadly accepting of norms.

If we want to compare oligarch support just check the cabinets of Biden Vs Trump. How many billionaires sit in positions of power, how much graft, how much corruption do we have to see before we relent and accept the liberals, as annoying milquetoast as they might be are actually the responsible stewards of governance?

We can just say we prefer the Democrats and support them without becoming fealty swearing cuckolds like Republicans have become. We can actually stand behind our liberal values. We can understand the concept of “perfect vs good”

Re:Meanwhile

By jacks smirking reven • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

This is absolute cope. Show me how the Democratic party moved “so far left” with actual policies and actions and not social media culture war bullshit. Show me legislation, show me actions.

The democrat voters elected Joe Biden, not Bernie Sanders. The Republicans told Nikki Haley to fuck off and chose Trump.

Saying the Republicans only moved 2% since 2008-2026 just tells me they were always corrupt irresponsible liars and you all enjoy that fact.

The Canvas Hack Is a New Kind of Ransomware Debacle

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Wired describes the recent Canvas breach as an unusually disruptive ransomware-style extortion incident because one attack on Instructure’s learning platform temporarily paralyzed thousands of schools during finals and end-of-year assignments. The hackers using the “ShinyHunters” name claim more than 8,800 schools were affected, while Instructure says exposed data included names, email addresses, student ID numbers, and platform messages. From the report:
Higher education has long been a target of ransomware gangs and data extortion attacks. But never before, perhaps, has a cyberattack against a single software platform so thoroughly disrupted the daily operations of thousands of schools across the United States. The widely used digital learning platform Canvas was put into “maintenance mode” on Thursday after its maker, the education tech giant Instructure, suffered a data breach and faced an extortion attempt by attackers using the recognizable moniker “ShinyHunters.” Though the hackers have been advertising the breach and attempting to extract a ransom payment from Instructure since May 1, the situation took on additional immediacy for regular people across the US and beyond on Thursday because the Canvas downtime caused chaos at schools, including those in the midst of finals and end-of-year assignments.

Universities like Harvard, Columbia, Rutgers, and Georgetown sent alerts to students about the situation in recent days; other institutions, including school districts in at least a dozen states, also appear to have been affected. In a list published by the hackers behind the attack on their ransom-focused dark web site, they claim the breach affected more than 8,800 schools. The exact scale and reach of the breach is currently unclear, though. And the fact that Canvas was down throughout Thursday afternoon and evening further complicated the picture. In a running incident update log that began on May 1, Steve Proud, Instructure’s chief information security officer, said that the company had “recently experienced a cybersecurity incident perpetrated by a criminal threat actor.” He added on May 2 that “the information involved” for “users at affected institutions” included names, email addresses, student ID numbers, and messages exchanged by users on the platform.

The situation was ultimately marked as “Resolved” on Wednesday, with Proud writing that “Canvas is fully operational, and we are not seeing any ongoing unauthorized activity.” At midday on Thursday, though, the Instructure status page registered an “issue” where “some users are having difficulties logging into Student ePortfolios.” Within a few hours, the company had added another status update: “Instructure has placed Canvas, Canvas Beta and Canvas Test in maintenance mode.” Late Thursday evening, the company said that Canvas was available again “for most users.”

TechCrunch reported on Thursday that the hackers launched a secondary wave of attacks, defacing some schools’ Canvas portals by injecting an HTML file to display their own message on the schools’ Canvas login pages. According to The Harvard Crimson, attackers modified the Harvard Canvas login page to show a message that included a list of schools that the hackers claim were impacted by the breach. The message from attackers “urged schools included on the affected list to consult with a cyber advisory firm and contact the group privately to negotiate a settlement before the end of the day on May 12 — or else risk their data being leaked,” The Crimson reported. “It is unclear what information tied to Harvard affiliates was included in the alleged breach.”

This is a systemic problem, not an isolated one

By Arrogant-Bastard • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
1. A few decades ago, universities/colleges ran their own IT infrastructure: email, web, applications, etc. But grossly-overpaid administrators decided that competent, experienced IT staff making far less were expendable and they began outsourcing everything they possibly could — because, of course, reducing the number of administrators and their compensation was never an option.

The consequences of that are now here. What were 8,000 targets are now: 1. And this isn’t the only such application — for example, much the same thing is true of email. And thus attackers now have luxury of focusing their efforts on a single target andl leveraging that into extortion against 8,000. None of the clueless, selfish, ignorant administrators responsible for this debacle will admit any responsibility — ever. They’re too busy enjoying their mansions while graduate students struggle to afford ramen for breakfast, lunch, and dinner, and junior faculty are forced to moonlight in order to make ends meet.

2. Instructure is following the standard playbook here: lie, lie, lie. They’re doing that because they know they can and because no will ever hold them accountable. It’s clear from what we already know that this was a very thorough hack, Instructure knows it was a very thorough hack, and they’re doing everything they can to hide that fact. And as a result of that, they’re deliberately making it impossible for everyone at those 8,000 institutions to understand what really happened and to take appropriate defensive measures (if any, if possible). Instructure isn’t in the least bit concerned about the damage done to all the students and faculty; Instructure only cares about itself.

Re:This is a systemic problem, not an isolated one

By bradley13 • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Your comment about administrators is absolutely right.

I’m in Europe, where the problem is less pronounced. Still, over the last 20 years, the ratio of non-teaching staff to teaching staff has gone from 2:3 to 3:2. Those numbers don’t look dramatic, but consider: It used to be that 100 teaching staff had 66 admin staff. Now that same 100 teaching staff have 150 admin staff, so 2.5 times as many. Not that our teaching loads have been reduced - much the contrary - our classes are now larger. You have to fund the bloat somehow.

I am reminded of the famous quote: “The bureacracy is expanding, to meet the expanding needs of the bureaucracy.”

Don’t people know not to pay?

By bradley13 • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Ransomware would completely die out, if people simply refused to pay. No profit to be had, criminals would spend their time elsewhere.

As encouragement, paying ransom should simply be illegal, with severe personal penalties for any administrator or managers who approves such a payment.

Re:Wordpress and cPanel are awesome

By jpellino • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Each LMS has some amazing features and some features that make you want to go back to stone tablets.
Canvas was the first LMS we used. They always spoke about report card creation, but we got tired of waiting.
So another platform after a decade. Which swore they could import standard LMS exported content, but nope.
Back then it was a choice between roll-your-own Moodle, branded/hosted Moodle, Blackboard - experienced users said please no - and Canvas.
We were impressed by the test and backup instances, and that they were willing to try moving into K-12.
And that Canvas was built as a project after gauging dissatisfaction with existing platforms. Mostly Blackboard.
Problem? Invoke your backup instance. Not sure how something is going to fly? Try the test instance.
Working with others who have had Google Classroom - still no test instance, backups are third party, no student view.
Yes, the core of GC is free, but you’re still getting mission-critical software from an ad company.
I’ve not kept up since we switched, but as bad as this is, this is an impressively long time to go without a crippling event.

Re:Are they even trying anymore?

By PPH • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Remember the scene in War Games where Lightman, sent to the principal’s office, obtains the school’s admin password from a sticky note on a desk?

That was over 40 years ago and not much has changed since then.

Sam Altman Had a Bad Day In Court

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Business Insider:
As the trial between Elon Musk and OpenAI ended its second week, the Tesla CEO started scoring points against Sam Altman. His witnesses landed three solid punches in testimony about how Altman runs OpenAI as CEO, raising concerns about his dedication to AI safety, the nonprofit’s mission, and his honesty as a leader of the organization. […] This week, Musk’s legal team called a parade of witnesses who questioned whether Altman was acting in the interest of the nonprofit. On Thursday, that included a former OpenAI safety researcher, who described a slow erosion of the company’s safety teams, which prompted her to leave the company. Witnesses also shared stories about the company launching products without the proper safety reviews — or the knowledge of the board.
Rosie Campbell, a former AI safety researcher at OpenAI, testified that the company became more product-focused during her time there and moved away from the long-term safety work that had initially drawn her in. She said both long-term AI safety teams were eventually eliminated, and that she supported Altman’s reinstatement only because she feared OpenAI might otherwise collapse into Microsoft: “It was my understanding at the time that the best way for OpenAI to not disintegrate and fall about would be for Sam to return.” Still, Campbell’s testimony wasn’t entirely favorable to Musk. She also said xAI, Musk’s AI company, likely had an inferior approach to safety than OpenAI.
Helen Toner, another former OpenAI board member, also testified about the board’s concerns leading up to Altman’s removal. She said the board was not primarily worried about ChatGPT’s safety, but about Altman’s leadership and investor relationships, saying, “The issues that we were concerned about in our decision to fire Sam were exacerbated by relationships with investors.” Toner also described concerns that Altman was misrepresenting what others had said, telling the court, “We were concerned that Sam was inserting words into other people’s mouths in order to get people to do what he wanted.”

Meanwhile, Tasha McCauley, a former OpenAI board member, described a deep loss of trust in Altman and accused him of creating “chaos” and “crisis” inside the company. She said Altman fostered a “culture of lying and culture of deceit,” including allegedly misleading others about whether GPT-4 Turbo needed internal safety review before launch.

Musk’s lawyers then called to the stand David Schizer, a Columbia Law professor and nonprofit-governance expert, who framed Altman’s alleged behavior as a serious governance problem for an organization that was supposed to be mission-driven. Asked about claims that products were launched without full board awareness or safety review, he said, “The board and CEO need to be partnering, working together, to make sure the mission is being followed,” adding that “if the CEO is withholding that information, it’s a big problem.”

The day ended with the start of a Microsoft executive’s deposition. Microsoft VP Michael Wetter said Azure had integrated OpenAI technology, that Microsoft saw strategic value in having AI developers build on Azure, and that a 2016 agreement allowed OpenAI to use Microsoft tools for free even though it could mean a loss of up to $15 million for Microsoft. Testimony ended early, with no court on Friday and the trial set to resume Monday.

Recap:
Sam Altman’s Management Style Comes Under the Microscope At OpenAI Trial (Day Seven)
Brockman Rebuts Musk’s Take On Startup’s History, Recounts Secret Work For Tesla (Day Six)
OpenAI President Discloses His Stake In the Company Is Worth $30 Billion (Day Five)
Musk Concludes Testimony At OpenAI Trial (Day Four)
Elon Musk Says OpenAI Betrayed Him, Clashes With Company’s Attorney (Day Three)
Musk Testifies OpenAI Was Created As Nonprofit To Counter Google (Day Two)
Elon Musk and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman Head To Court (Day One)

Altman vs Musk

By CAIMLAS • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Neither is a particularly endearing character, but of the 2, Altman gives me more of the “serial killer who’d poison your entire family to get what he wants, turn your back and he’ll take your wallet” type of evil, and Musk more the “we’re going to leave everyone on earth to die, want to have my child?” kind of evil. I’m not sure which is worse … but in this case, Musk clearly has a better argument against OpenAI than OpenAI has in its defense - merely from the ‘nonprofit to profit’ basis, ignoring the intent and other aspects about safety.... which is certainly concerning in its own right.

OT, but… the way these big shops seem to be doing ‘safety’ is an idiotic bolt-on approach, from what I can see: it’s all after-the-fact. If you give your agent/model a foundational prompt like “You’re a helpful bot”, that colors everything it does after that. They need to have a moral/foundations layer which does the same thing, perhaps even trained on its own very insular dataset that’s been curated to meet objectives that can help it rank the value of different data. That way Reddit or some postgrad’s humanities paperwork doesn’t get the same criterial evaluation as, say, Socrates, Einstein, or the Bible. Maybe they do that - but it certainly doesn’t seem like it, based on how easy it is to get them to disobey “safety” guidelines.

Re:relevance?

By thecombatwombat • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

I think it actually makes perfect sense.

The whole thing hinges on taking money from Musk claiming to do one thing, and then doing another.

The point is that he was never operating like a nonprofit, but took lots of money to do so. It does sound like a series of wins there, yeah.

Re:Altman vs Musk

By Required Snark • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
Is there any way they can both loose?

Re:Altman vs Musk

By dunkelfalke • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Thiel is, like Musk, someone who wants to change the world for the worse because he thinks he knows better. Altman simply wants wealth.

Challenge for the legal system

By david.emery • Score: 5, Funny Thread

How do we find both Musk and Altman guilty, and sentence them to life in prison?

IMF Warns New AI Models Risk ‘Systemic’ Shock To Finance

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot
The IMF is warning that advanced AI-powered cyberattacks pose a serious threat to global financial stability. “IMF analysis suggests that extreme cyber-incident losses could trigger funding strains, raise solvency concerns, and disrupt broader markets,” the lender warned in a new report. The report urged greater international cooperation and emphasized resilience, since breaches are “inevitable” — particularly for emerging economies with weaker defenses. Agence France-Presse reports:
The study’s authors highlighted the risks posed by the highly interconnected nature of the global financial system, with advanced AI models able to “dramatically reduce” the time and cost of exploiting vulnerabilities. […] The IMF warned that emerging and developing countries, “which often have more severe resource constraints, may be disproportionately exposed to attackers targeting regions with weaker defenses.”

The risks, the authors said, were systemic, cut across sectors and came with the threat of contagion, with the reliance on a small number of platforms and cloud providers likely to increase “the impact of any single exploited weakness.” “Defenses will inevitably be breached, so resilience must also be a priority, specifically to limit how far incidents spread and ensure rapid recovery,” the report said.

IMF chief Kristalina Georgieva warned last month that the global financial system was not ready for the cybersecurity threats posed by AI. “We are very keen to see more attention to the guardrails that are necessary to protect financial stability in a world of AI,” she told CBS News, seeking global collaboration on the issue.

Disavowed if they’re caught or captured …

By fahrbot-bot • Score: 5, Funny Thread

IMF Warns New AI Models Risk ‘Systemic’ Shock To Finance

I wonder what their mission will be and if they’ll accept it.

[I’m guessing it will involve very clever prompting, wearing a mask - and lots of running.]

AI spending

By evanh • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

poses a serious threat to global financial stability.

Re:IMF does not want competition

By Anonymous Coward • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Even Iran holding thousands of seafarers hostage is Trump’s fault.
Um, that one actually is, although Netanyahu shares some of the blame.

It’s not like the vulnerability of the Strait of Hormuz was a secret.

What does it matter?

By high_rolla • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

If AI is going to take all our jobs anyway and none of us will have any money then what does it matter?

IMF Chief is an idiot and/or scoundrel

By drinkypoo • Score: 3 Thread

IMF chief Kristalina Georgieva warned last month that the global financial system was not ready for the cybersecurity threats posed by AI. “We are very keen to see more attention to the guardrails that are necessary to protect financial stability in a world of AI,” she told CBS News, seeking global collaboration on the issue.

That. Is. Not. How. Anything. Works.

No amount of AI guardrails will prevent state-sponsored attacks using AI-discovered vulnerabilities, because governments will always exempt themselves from using those guardrails. Even if you accept the idea that you will always need big iron to train LLMs, that still means someone will be making them specifically for the purpose of defeating security.

QED, anyone who says we can fix the problem with guardrails is either a classical idiot or is part of a con. The only way to “solve” the problem is with constant attention to security, and elimination of single points of failure. And there is no “solution”, only eternal vigilance, or failure.