Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. NASA Wants To Send Spare Nuclear-Powered Mars Rover To the Moon
  2. The Vera Rubin Telescope Begins Surveying Our Cosmos
  3. DOT Announces ‘Return of Supersonic Flight’ For Commercial Airlines
  4. Trump Drops Restrictions On Anthropic’s Mythos and Fable Models
  5. New Florida Law Bans Local Net-Zero Emissions Policies
  6. Amazon Blames Piracy Apps With Malware For Killing New Fire Stick Sideloading
  7. Google Pulls the Plug On Tenor API, Killing GIF Pickers Around the Web
  8. California Bill To Preserve Online Games Fails Committee Vote
  9. Apple iPhone 18 Details Leaked In Tata Data Breach
  10. Claude Science is Here, Antibiotics Designed by Text Prompt Among Applications
  11. Microsoft Previews Linux Containers That Run In Windows
  12. County With 37 Data Centers Asks Schools To ‘Conserve Electricity’
  13. South Korea To Spend $1 Trillion On More Memory Chip Production, Humanoid Robots
  14. US Supreme Court Rules Geofence Warrants Require Constitutional Privacy Protections
  15. Remembering How Microsoft’s Fake Windows Error Ended In a $280 Million Secret Settlement

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

NASA Wants To Send Spare Nuclear-Powered Mars Rover To the Moon

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Space.com:
NASA provided an Artemis update today (June 30), announcing new lunar landing contracts for its Moon Base initiative and a surprise new possible rover mission that could be headed to the moon’s south pole. During the second monthly update that NASA has provided for its moon base plans, the agency named Astrobotic, Firefly Aerospace and Intuitive Machines as the providers of four robotic landers that will deliver scientific payloads to the surface of the moon, as NASA tests and expands the technologies needed for a permanent human outpost. “This is this drawing on the playbook that worked very well for NASA during the 1960s,” NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman said during the livestreamed update, explaining the experiential approach to a crewed lunar return. “We didn’t just jump right to Apollo 11.”

Isaacman also announced the potential repurposing of an engineering development model built to mirror the agency’s Perseverance and Curiosity rovers on Mars. “There is another,” Isaacman said, quoting Yoda’s line from “Star Wars: The Empire Strikes Back.” That test rover is called PROMISE, short for “Polar Rover for Observation, Mapping, and In-Situ Exploration” (though it was formerly known as Optimism). PROMISE was developed at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) in Southern California, where it has been used as a test platform for fixes or commands that engineers want to try on the ground before permanently sending them to Perseverance and Curiosity. Now, NASA wants to send PROMISE on a mission of its own. Though sending PROMISE to the moon would leave Perseverance and Curiosity — both of which remain active on Mars — without an Earth-based testbed, Isaacman thinks it would be worth it. “We’ve had years now of experience operating the two rovers on the surface of Mars, and we’ve got this hardware that the taxpayers have invested a lot in,” he said. “So the question was posed: ‘What if we send it to the moon?’"

With a little refurbishment, PROMISE would help advance NASA’s lunar plans, Isaacman added. Like Perseverance and Curiosity, the test rover is powered by a radioisotope thermoelectric generator (RTG), which converts heat from naturally decaying radioactive material into electricity. So it wouldn’t require sunlight to operate — a real benefit on the moon, where most locations experience long stretches of darkness. (NASA plans to build its Artemis base near the moon’s south pole, which is thought to harbor an abundance of water ice and also has a relatively complex lighting environment.) The other robots currently in the works to launch on future missions to the moon, including the landers announced during today’s update, are all solar powered. Through 2029, NASA hopes to launch up to 20 such missions as part of the CLPS (Commercial Lunar Payload Services) initiative to support the first phase of the agency’s moon base plans, and the landers announced today will be some of the first in that lineup.

The Vera Rubin Telescope Begins Surveying Our Cosmos

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
The Vera C. Rubin Observatory has begun its 10-year Legacy Survey of Space and Time, using the world’s largest digital camera to image the entire southern sky every few nights. The project is expected to catalog billions of stars and galaxies, track changing and transient objects, and generate an enormous dataset for studying dark matter, galaxy formation, asteroids, and unexpected cosmic phenomena. The New York Times reports:
“This is the end of a 30-year wait,” said Phil Marshall, the deputy director of the telescope’s operations at SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory in California, in a statement to The New York Times. “It’s a major milestone for us.” Astronomers expect this collection of data, known as the Legacy Survey of Space and Time, to revolutionize their knowledge of our galaxy’s birth, the invisible matter permeating the cosmos, what shaped the universe into the structure it has today and more. According to Dr. Marshall, the survey is designed to see everything, “even the things we don’t know we’re looking for yet,” he said.

The team behind the observatory, a joint effort funded by the U.S. Department of Energy and the National Science Foundation, unveiled several images of the cosmos that were jampacked with celestial goodness — a peek at what the Rubin could do — last year. Since then, scientists have been busy conducting final tests and reviews of the telescope’s operations and systems. According to Bob Blum, the director of Rubin operations at the National Optical-Infrared Astronomy Research Laboratory, the team has also been hard at work ensuring that the telescope can operate reliably in different environmental conditions for the next decade.

Keep it quiet

By necro81 • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
Please keep it quiet, otherwise the anti-DEI police of the current Administration will force it to close down, and probably douse it in acid, just for the crime of being named for a (qualified, historic, accomplished) woman.

Or, they’ll go after it for the same reason they went after the ocean monitoring system: they don’t want people asking questions the Administration doesn’t want the answers to. Don’t Look Up was supposed to be a parable, not an instruction manual.

How will its images compare to Hubble?

By schwit1 • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Wider field of view, vastly more data (time-lapse survey of entire sky every few nights), but lower angular resolution than Hubble’s sharp, targeted deep-space images.

How does it compare to other ground based telescopes?
Largest wide-field survey telescope (8.4m mirror, 3.2 gigapixel camera). Faster and broader than most ground-based (e.g., Subaru, VISTA), but lower resolution than adaptive-optics giants like Keck or ELT.

Cue Elvis…

By Black Parrot • Score: 3, Funny Thread

“Thank you Vera much.”

DOT Announces ‘Return of Supersonic Flight’ For Commercial Airlines

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
The FAA plans to replace its 1973 ban on civilian supersonic flight over U.S. land with a noise-based standard, potentially allowing aircraft to exceed Mach 1 as long as they stay below certain sound limits. The agency aims to finalize the rules by mid-2027, opening the door for companies such as Boom Supersonic and Spike Aerospace to operate quieter next-generation passenger jets over land. Longtime Slashdot reader schwit1 shared the notice (PDF) published Tuesday by the FAA. Forbes reports:
Technological advances “will eliminate the old sonic boom,” FAA Administrator Bryan Bedford said in a statement. “This means we can ultimately repeal the ban from the 1970s on supersonic flight over U.S. territory while minimizing noise impacts to residents in communities along the route and near airports.” The primary reason was public opposition to loud sonic booms. In the 1960s, a plane flying faster than the speed of sound — about 660 mph at high altitudes — created shock waves that traveled to the ground and reached human ears as a loud gunshot-like crack or thunder-like boom. Tests during that decade, including the Oklahoma City sonic boom experiments, found repeated booms broke windows, damaged property and generated thousands of public complaints.

In its 1973 ruling, the FAA stated that due to the limits of technology at that time, “a prohibition was needed to protect the public from sonic boom .... by preventing operations of a civil aircraft at a true flight Mach number greater than 1.” Several years later, Air France and British Airways introduced Concorde, and were allowed to serve New York’s John F. Kennedy International Airport as long as flights remained subsonic over U.S. land. Notably, “the prestigious London-New York service was the only truly profitable [Concorde] route, supported by high-powered business and celebrity travel,” wrote a former British Airways network planner for Forbes in 2021.

Several U.S. companies are working on a new generation of luxurious supersonic passenger aircraft with much quieter sonic booms and improved fuel efficiency. In particular, Colorado-headquartered Boom Supersonic says it has pre-orders from United Airlines, American Airlines and Japan Airlines for its Overture jets, which will carry 60-80 passengers. Atlanta-based Spike Aerospace is developing smaller Diplomat jets for up to 18 passengers. Both companies’ websites tout future transatlantic flights in under four hours.

More pandering to Epstein class billionaires

By cosmicl • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
who gotta have their faster louder planes to go with their faster louder AI data centers. More because we can, and screw you.

Re:US senators ae shiteaters who swallow

By Sique • Score: 5, Informative Thread
I wonder why most other nations also had a ban of non-military supersonic flight in place, nations with supersonic passenger jets, a.k.a. France and the United Kingdom, and those without, like Brasil or Germany.

Supersonic flight is incredibly noisy, and you don’t want it above you.

Concorde was LOUD!

By Malc • Score: 4, Informative Thread

It wasn’t just the sonic booms, this plane was just all around loud. It was a civilian plane afterburners! As somebody who lives about 500m directly under one of Heathrow’s landing flight paths, I’m happy it’s not coming over anymore.

I’ve always liked this video though. It starts off so quiet, suburban and banal, and then Corcorde roars over and shatters the scene, setting off a car alarm.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?…

Of course, there are lots of videos like this one too, also setting off car alarms:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?…

Re:Its not either or

By Ol Olsoc • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Back in the day Boeing and McDonnell Douglas were handed their arses by Concorde and didn’t like it so yes, part of the reason was US protectionism. Would the ban have happened anyway? Possibly, but the US aircraft industry certainly helped swing it.

So you’re saying that a plan that handles 100 people at a cost in today’s dollars was 15 to 17 thousand dollars per ass in seat and wasn’t that profitable, was putting the US plane makers out of business?

If you hate all things USA, sure, it makes sense that soon everyone would be flying an army of Concordes - gotta make a lot of them, since say a Boeing 747 could handle 3 times the passengers - and everyone would be wealthy enough to afford over 30 thousand dollars for their trip - assuming that the were going to do a round trip.

Do you have a back of envelope plan for the viability of your assertions? Both to making the American options unprofitable, and that the Concorde was going to take over if not stopped by US Lawmakers since we were getting our asses handed to us by one single plane?

Out of curiosity, would you personally pay 30 thousand dollars versus around 500 dollars to go from NYC to Paris and back?

For the rich…

By FrankSchwab • Score: 3 Thread

So the rest of us are going to get to experience the joys of sonic thumps so that the 0.1% can get across the country an hour quicker?

You and I are never going to be able to afford a ticket on a “luxurious supersonic passenger aircraft” that seats 18 or 60-80 passengers. But we get to experience it. Whadda ya bet that the approved routes won’t go over Mar a Lago, Malibu, or Los Altos?

Trump Drops Restrictions On Anthropic’s Mythos and Fable Models

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
The Trump administration has lifted export restrictions that forced Anthropic to shut off public access to its Mythos and Fable models. After weeks of talks, Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick said Anthropic “has agreed to proactively detect and address security risks associated with the models; to work diligently with the U.S. government on protocols and standards and releases for Mythos, Fable and future models; and to inform the US government of any malicious activity.” Access is set to begin returning July 1. TechCrunch reports:
Anthropic had already publicly pledged to do much of this voluntarily, months before the export rule existed. That’s part of why cybersecurity experts were skeptical of the restrictions in the first place. To them, the ban looked less like a security fix and more like leverage, a way for the Trump administration to punish Anthropic for its executives’ public criticism of how the government, and the president’s political opponents, might use the technology.

Mythos was originally made available to a select group of organizations beginning in April to allay concerns about its ability to identify and exploit vulnerabilities in software, while a version called Fable was released to the public in June with additional security guardrails. However, with Asian AI companies beginning to release their own AI models approaching Mythos-level capabilities — among them Fugu and Tulonfeng — the US government was under pressure to ease its restrictions on Anthropic to ensure that American AI could compete globally.

Last week, Lutnick cleared Mythos to be released to select customers approved by the White House. OpenAI’s latest models were also released to a group of organizations approved by the Trump team, instead of the public. The Trump administration’s erratic approach to AI policymaking has left companies across the industry with little clarity about what will govern future model releases. An executive order issued in June that signaled a desire to review models ahead of release was criticized by influential analysts like Dean W. Ball, who recently started a policy position at OpenAI.

TACO Tuesday?

By evanh • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Yet another Trump back down.

Nice, but…

By meringuoid • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

… sadly for the Americans, the rest of the world now knows they can’t count on a US based provider for this kind of thing any more.

It was uncomfortable enough relying so heavily on American software back when it couldn’t be switched off remotely on the say so of an idiot. Today it’s an intolerable risk.

Re:Means nothing

By ArchieBunker • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Oh one thing is consistent. https://www.cbsnews.com/projec…

Anyone recall Jimmy Carter having to sell his peanut farm?

So now we know

By Snotnose • Score: 3, Interesting Thread
the bribes have been paid.

Re:TACO Tuesday?

By nightflameauto • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Yet another Trump back down.

This one’s pretty easy to understand from a sky-level view. He finally figured out how to make money off of Anthropic. Or their check cleared. Or both. There’s only one thing Donald Trump cares about: enrichment. His own or his family’s. Not yours. Not mine.

New Florida Law Bans Local Net-Zero Emissions Policies

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Inside Climate News:
A new state law limits Florida communities’ aims to offset greenhouse gas emissions that are warming the global climate and intensifying disasters such as hurricanes. Specifically, HB 1217 prohibits local governments from pursuing net-zero emissions goals. At least 10 cities and counties have implemented such policies, including Fort Lauderdale, Miami, Orlando and Leon County, where Tallahassee, the state capital, is located. But the new law will not necessarily upend these policies, said Bradley Marshall, senior attorney at Earthjustice, an advocacy group. “It’s certainly meant to scare municipalities and local governments from trying to do things to further net-zero policies,” he said. “Now, its exact impact and what it exactly prohibits is probably up for some debate. Things that are adjacent to it — emissions reductions and even climate change reduction policies — on their face will not run afoul at all of a ban on adopting a net zero policy.”

The measure requires local governments to submit an affidavit annually to the state Department of Revenue verifying compliance. Gov. Ron DeSantis, a Republican, signed the measure on April 22, Earth Day, and the law will take effect July 1. It states that “net zero policies, carbon taxes and assessments, and emission trading programs are detrimental to this state’s energy security and economic interests and inconsistent with the energy policy and the environmental policy of this state.” […] HB 1217 also prevents local governments from purchasing items such as vehicles or appliances based on the fuels they use or production of the items. Local governments may not participate in carbon-trading programs or use public funds to support other organizations with net-zero policies. Cities and counties also may not charge a tax or fee tied with carbon emissions.
“This bill is definitely part of a larger coordinated push by the political enablers of the fossil fuel industry to obstruct any tools — legal or legislative tools — to hold the industry accountable for its contributions to climate change,” said Laura Peterson, senior analyst at the Union for Concerned Scientists, an advocacy group. “Florida is really on the front lines. So I imagine the governor is taking this step because he sees what’s coming down the pike. It’s not getting better. So I can only assume that this is an effort to satisfy some of the pressures that he’s getting from donors and from his party to protect the industry. And he’s doing it at the expense of his constituents.”

Re:I’m OK with stupid

By RazorSharp • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

When you get to a certain level of stupid, the stupidity merely comes in different flavors, not degrees.

Re:Huh

By jythie • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I am not even sure it is really about trump or the party, and I doubt the energy companies actually care about things like this. DeSantis is deep into the ‘cruelty as a status symbol’ thing, and evangelicals eat that up. They don’t seem to really care what he (and others) do, as long as it hurts and upsets people they see as inferior…

Remind me again…

By davidwr • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

… which major American political party claims it is in favor of local control?

Re:Yes. This is how you keep housing costs down

By shilly • Score: 5, Informative Thread

What the fuck is a “net zero” HVAC? Every vapour-compression air conditioner is just an air-to-air heat pump in cooling mode and always has been. What do you imagine is being done to make an HVAC “net zero”? It already has a COP of 3 or 4 and runs on electricity, the only thing that can make it less carbon intensive is using low carbon power to generate the electricity. The AC itself doesn’t work more or less well for being an inherently net zero technology, you dumbass.

Re:Global Warming is Hitting Florida Hard

By high_rolla • Score: 5, Funny Thread

They have a solution to this too. I’m sure in the near future they will introduce a new state law banning the sea from rising.
There will also be a subclause that should a local government break this law then they must rectify it exclusively through solutions that involve fossil fuels.
There you go, problem solved.

Amazon Blames Piracy Apps With Malware For Killing New Fire Stick Sideloading

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Amazon says it is ending sideloading on new Fire Sticks because “apps that facilitate piracy, and other apps, can carry malware,” adding that there is “a good amount of evidence” that sideloaded apps may contain unwanted code or behavior. However, the company did not provide specific examples of Fire Stick users being harmed. Ars Technica reports:
Amazon has released two Fire Stick models that use its proprietary, Linux-based operating system, Vega OS. Previous Fire Sticks ran Fire OS, which is an Android fork based on the Android Open Source Project. One of the biggest differences between Vega OS and Fire OS is that the former doesn’t support sideloading. […] In a recent interview, Or Goren, editor-in-chief of Cord Busters, a UK-based streaming news outlet, noted the negative reaction to Vega being a closed OS. [Aidan Marcuss, VP of Fire TV, advertising, and Appstore] responded, per the publication, by saying that Vega OS was Amazon’s opportunity to “innovate and deliver more capabilities, even on the least expensive devices.”

He also said that making a platform around security and privacy was “sort of utmost in my mind.” The statement is somewhat ironic, considering Vega OS blocks custom launchers and other third-party apps that helped users avoid Amazon tracking and ads. Goren asked whether Amazon had evidence that sideloaded devices caused users harm. “Apps that facilitate piracy, and other apps, can carry malware,” Marcuss responded. Marcuss also said that there is “a good amount of evidence that apps can carry unwanted code and behavior on them when they’re sideloaded.”

Marcuss didn’t provide specific examples of Fire Stick users being hurt by sideloaded apps. There are some potential examples, though. In 2025, Amazon claimed to blacklist (which blocked the apps from being sideloaded to Fire Sticks) four video streaming apps for malicious behavior. At the time, AFTVnews reported that two of the apps served as residential proxy providers and were considered riskware, and that the other two had APK files that were flagged by virus-scanning tools. Safari and Chrome also flagged one of the apps’ official websites, the publication reported. And in 2018, a botnet that infected Android devices with cryptocurrency-mining malware appeared on some Fire Sticks, per discussion on XDA Forums. That said, Amazon also has a history of disabling apps that let users circumnavigate its home screen that Fire devices, including Fire Sticks and Fire TVs, have increasingly used for ads.
Worth noting: developers can continue sideloading apps onto Vega OS devices if they register them with Amazon.

Amazon cares about your security

By Hentes • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Amazon cares about your security. Which is why their next step will be to also remove fraudulent, dangerous or IP infringing products from amazon.com. Right?

Bloated, laggy, non-intuitive interfaces

By gaiageek • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Even with no sideloaded apps and just a few of the standard streaming apps installed, every Fire TV device I’ve used suffers from a laggy interface, surely due to the advertising bloat that they integrated into their home screen a few years back. In my experience, the lag is there even with preview autoplay disabled. And even if you minimize the lag by shelling out for their “top end” devices, the home screen interface is simply terrible for navigating to your installed apps.

The only thing that made dealing with the above worthwhile was the fact that you could sideload apps, like RetroArch and Kodi, to make the device more useful than your average Smart TV device, like a Roku or AppleTV. With sideloading gone, I can safely say I’ll never buy an Fire TV device again.

Fine, try to block it

By Baron_Yam • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

But a computer I can’t load my own code on is no longer a general purpose computer - it’s a walled-garden appliance and I’m not going to buy it.

Well yeah

By DrXym • Score: 3 Thread
People don’t buy firesticks to use them as Amazon intended. They buy them because they make convenient devices for “dodgybox” services - streaming pay content etc. So Amazon are right to say they enable piracy. On the flip side, if they shut that door, then who in their right minds would even want to buy the things? I bet a very substantial % of sales of them are for nefarious purposes and if Amazon prevent it then they’ll be sitting on a lot of unsold inventory.

Plenty of Android Boxen Outhere

By williamyf • Score: 3 Thread

True android boxes, with full android support (not AOSP). Problem is, no subsidies.

Which means, low quality low performance at low prices. Or Decent Quality Decent performance at high prices, or anything in between (including low quality, low performance at high prices).

The reason why many sideloaders gravitated towards the amazon fire TV ecosystem was that it was subsidized, therefore, decent performance (once you left the home screen and entered your sideloaded app), decent hardware, decent quality, decent SW support, super-low price

If you have a Walmart nearby, ONN TV boxes vahe a good reputation of middling performance, decent build quality, not so great SW updates track record at a low price. But buyer beware, walmatr got serious about you using the box in the country you bought it, so, if you buy one in the USoA or europe and get it to LatAm or the middle east, it will not work propperly.

Google Pulls the Plug On Tenor API, Killing GIF Pickers Around the Web

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Google has shut down the Tenor API, breaking GIF pickers in services that still relied on it and forcing platforms such as X to migrate elsewhere. 9to5Google notes that the library itself remains available at Tenor.com and “integrations within Google products are also still active, including Gboard, Google Messages, and more.” From the report:
The Tenor API has been rejecting new API sign-ups in January of this year, but existing integrations remained in place. This week, though, they’re shutting down, and any integrations that remain in place will stop working on July 1. The support page adds details that “any API or Ads Distribution Agreements” with Tenor will be terminated on June 30, while “current integrations” will be “fully decommissioned” as of June 30.

One of the most notable examples here is Twitter/X, which has relied on Tenor for its GIF picker for years. Twitter/X Head of Product Nikita Bier confirmed that the platform has migrated elsewhere, which is why the “recently used” section was purged, and why you might notice fewer GIF options when posting. Other platforms affected include Discord, WhatsApp, and Bluesky.

Shocked

By dwater • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

I’m amazed that any company relies on anything from Google…with them shutting things down and deciding not to provide services to huge chunks of the world.
I guess it’s time for me to review my use of all things Google, again…

Re:Shocked

By Guillermito • Score: 5, Informative Thread
This is a service that was acquired by Google. So in this case even people that were actively avoiding Google products got screwed.

Does this mean fewer animated GIFs in chats?

By 93 Escort Wagon • Score: 4, Informative Thread

If so, it’s a win in my book.

“forcing”

By bill_mcgonigle • Score: 3 Thread

The way the article is written makes this seem sudden, but Wayback has a discontinuation article at least as far back as January.

https://web.archive.org/web/20…

Maybe third-party cookie blocking killed this. I can imagine automated personality profile builders being done in the background based on GIF’s people choose to use.

California Bill To Preserve Online Games Fails Committee Vote

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
California’s Protect Our Games Act, which would require publishers to warn players before shutting down paid online games and offer refunds or continued access, failed to advance after a state Senate committee vote. Four state senators voted in favor, three voted against, and four abstained. Engadget reports:
The committee unanimously voted in favor of granting the bill reconsideration, meaning it could come back before this group of state senators. Assemblymember Chris Ward introduced the bill in February and it passed the California State Assembly 43-16 in late May. That said, the abstentions prevented the bill’s progression for now. “Not enough yeses means the bill stops here for this session,” a volunteer with the Stop Killing Games campaign (which supported the bill) noted on Reddit. “That is the loss.”

The volunteer also claimed this was the movement’s first attempt to nudge such legislation through in the U.S., and that the bill got this far without paid staff or an in-person lobbying campaign. They said the Entertainment Software Association — a trade organization of major game industry publishers — brought in a lobbyist to halt the bill’s progress (including by claiming private servers for the likes of Minecraft would be “illegal”) and that Stop Killing Games would be more prepared to counter that in the future.

“Next session, we come back with an in-person lobbying presence, the funding to do this properly and a long list of organizations and developers signed on in support,” the volunteer, u/Mr_Presidentle, wrote. “We are not limiting this to California. We intend to introduce versions of this in other state legislatures, and we are seriously looking at the federal level.”

In case you missed it

By CEC-P • Score: 3 Thread
That clueless lying bitch that testified said “it is illegal to run private Minecraft servers. There are at least 2 lawsuits against people who do that right now!”
Private minecraft servers are 100% allowed btw.

Read the Legislative Analysis

By eepok • Score: 5, Informative Thread

From the SENATE COMMITTEE ON BUSINESS, PROFESSIONS AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billAnalysisClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB1921):

The bill would create new obligations that are technically challenging, commercially impractical, and inconsistent with conclusions reached by policymakers in the United Kingdom and the European Union. Mandating patches, offline versions, community-server functionality, or refunds in all circumstances is unworkable. Requiring publishers to modify, reproduce, or distribute their games after support has ended interferes with rights protected under federal copyright law, while blanket refund requirements fail to account for the value consumers may already have received through months or years of gameplay.

That implies a bit more burden than the bill actually requires. From AB-1921 digest (https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB1921):

The bill would, beginning on the date an operator ceases to provide services necessary for the ordinary use of the game, require the operator to provide the purchaser with, among other things, an alternate version of, a patch or update to, or a refund for, the game, as provided, and prohibit the operator from selling, leasing, or otherwise distributing a version of the game that cannot be used by a purchaser independent of services controlled by the operator. The bill would authorize the Attorney General or a district attorney to bring a civil action for a violation of these provisions.

From the bill language:

(2) Beginning on the date a digital game operator ceases to provide services necessary for the ordinary use of the digital game, the operator shall provide the purchaser with one or more of the following:
      (A) A version of the digital game that can be used by the purchaser independent of services controlled by the operator.
      (B) A patch or update to the purchaser’s version of the digital game that enables its continued use independent of services controlled by the operator.
      (C) A refund in an amount equal to the highest price of the digital game offered by the digital game operator within the 12 months before the digital game operator ceases providing services necessary for the ordinary use of the digital game.
      (D) All necessary documentation to allow the purchaser to host a private or community server with which the purchaser could make ordinary use of the game independent of services controlled by the operator.
      (E)
                  (i) Subject to clause (ii), a version of server software that the game may connect to in order to make ordinary use of the game independent of other ongoing services.
                  (ii) If the server software contains additional hardware or software requirements than what was necessary for the original game, clause (i) shall apply only if the operator has communicated that fact to the purchaser and the additional hardware or software requirements are reasonably attainable at the time services by the digital operator cease.

The committee analysis greatly exaggerates the requirements, but the objections are still at least somewhat valid. If a company (imagine a developer-owner, one-man show) stops hosting the only live server for a game because he’s taking care of an ill spouse, why should he be obligated to make significant software modifications, host those patches, or create documentation instructing how to create and host a the game via a private server. And if he doesn’t do so, then he has to refund everyone at the HIGHEST PRICE for which the game has sold in the last 12 months?

This bill was written like it was intended to stick it to EA or Blizzard, so that didn’t help.

Lastly, and certainly not least, the part authorizing the State Attorney General to take legal action on violating developers was just ill-advised in this legislative session. You see, the California Legislature has a rule that no bill that could cost the State more than $100,000 should move through the process without exceptional circumstance. The cost for the State Attorney General to take on dozens of “dead video game cases” would put the bill’s price tag way over that threshold.

The bill was asking too much in today’s modern financial contexts and might have been asking for too much to start with.

A BETTER bill would have been simple: “The IP-holder of a video game that ceases distribution/hosting ALSO relinquishes both liability and control over software replication and hosting.” Basically, if you abandon something, it goes into a special licensing phase wherein other people can replicate it and re-distribute it, but they’re not authorized to draw a profit from those actions.

Whomever Has the Most Money Wins

By BrendaEM • Score: 3 Thread
No surprise for any kind of American Justice.

Apple iPhone 18 Details Leaked In Tata Data Breach

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
“Another breach at Tata has leaked details about Apple’s iPhone 18, along with documents belonging to several other Tata clients,” writes Longtime Slashdot reader Ritz_Just_Ritz. “It’s becoming a recurring theme for the company.” Reuters reports:
Reuters has previously reported the Tata Electronics leak of more than 200,000 files on the dark web by World Leaks had files with purported component design papers of older iPhones and some parts of Tesla — both Tata clients. They also included documents of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co and Qualcomm, both of which make parts used in iPhones. New documents reviewed by Reuters show there are at least six files that map many components in the iPhone 18 Pro models to the specific company that supplies them. These include details of chips on its main circuit board and parts of the battery and cameras.

Apple considers this detail sensitive and is concerned about the documents being shared on the dark web as they relate to unreleased models, according to the person familiar with the matter. The data maps suppliers to iPhone parts, which Apple does not disclose in its public database of suppliers, the person added. In all, the documents detail hundreds of parts to be on the upcoming iPhone 18 Pro models. The records also show where Apple draws a part from several suppliers and where it relies on just a few, laying bare both its bargaining leverage and its vulnerabilities.
More broadly, the leak threatens Apple’s trust in Tata just as Tata is becoming central to its effort to shift iPhone production away from China. With India expected to produce roughly a quarter of the world’s iPhones in 2026, any deterioration in that relationship could complicate Apple’s diversification strategy and force tighter security controls across its suppliers.

So Tata’s success would come at China’s expense

By 93 Escort Wagon • Score: 3 Thread

… and China has hundreds/thousands of government-sponsored hacking teams. Nah, I’m sure there’s no connection there.

Lie with dogs, wake up with fleas.

By TigerPlish • Score: 3, Informative Thread

Every single Indian IT outfit I’ve directly worked with has been a dumpster fire. Why should Tata be any different?

That Apple relies on them is scary. That Apple’s info has been leaked thanks to Tata is no surprise.

Surely, in the meeting where this partnership was green-lit at apple someone must’ve objected, right? Right?.

Claude Science is Here, Antibiotics Designed by Text Prompt Among Applications

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Anthropic has launched Claude Science, an AI workbench that connects more than 60 scientific databases and tools through a single interface. Through the platform, Basecamp Research is making its EDEN models available for tasks such as designing antibiotic peptides and predicting vaccine targets from simple text prompts, though the results still require laboratory testing before clinical use. Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology News reports:
In a Claude Science demo, Oliver Vince, PhD, co-founder at Basecamp, uploaded a sample patient microbiology report. When given a simple natural language prompt, the platform designed peptides, predicted their efficacy, and provided a shortlist of candidates most likely to succeed in experiments in minutes. While generating human-ready antibiotics at the click of a button is still a step away, Vince said democratizing these tools is a powerful first step, particularly for researchers in regions where accelerated computing infrastructure is not readily accessible. “Most models require you to be a computational scientist,” Vince told GEN Edge. “Now, potentially any clinician in the world can chat with Claude and design an antibiotic that may work.”

Beat you to it!

By ebonum • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Computer. Cure Cancer.

DONE!

Re:Suuuure

By JoshuaZ • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
The summary explicitly mentions “a shortlist of candidates most likely to succeed in experiments”- so they are very aware that these systems may be wrong. If there’s a legitimate criticism here, it is that it isn’t obvious that these aren’t short lists very similar to if not identical to the lists an expert would come up with. But that’s a different claim.

Re: Why your wife died?

By OrangeTide • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Typos are not usually a big deal because of how tokens work. Letting AI flatter you so you will accept every edit it makes is the real risk. It will go off plan without warning, it will forget important requirements or prohibitions. And it will subtly alter goals in order to retroactively support its poor activities, that includes gaslighting you about the whole thing.

“one step away” yeah right.

By Todd Knarr • Score: 4, Informative Thread

It’s not anywhere near one step away. Designing the peptides and getting one or more candidates is the easy part. The next steps are the hard ones, the ones that make pharmaceutical chemists and drug researchers cry:

Getting through this process will take multiple tries and years of work, assuming you succeed at all. There’s a reason they say that the clinic (clinical trials) is where drug candidates go to die.

What is the performance?

By Rutulian • Score: 3 Thread

In a Claude Science demo, Oliver Vince, PhD, co-founder at Basecamp, uploaded a sample patient microbiology report. When given a simple natural language prompt, the platform designed peptides, predicted their efficacy, and provided a shortlist of candidates most likely to succeed in experiments in minutes.

This is a meaningless statement. I too can create a tool to generate a list of peptide candidates with minimal effort. It may even be somewhat useful if it based peptide sequences on homology searches or some other relevant biology instead of random string generation. This has been an active area of research for than 20 years. In order for this to be newsworthy. Claude has to be better than what already exists. How many novel candidates does it generate that actually have useful antibiotic properties? Do I have to screen through a list of 100 candidates to find one that actually works? If so, that’s not much better than a BLAST search and it costs a lot more. What is the strain selectivity of the new antibiotic? Is it broad or narrow spectrum? How easy is it to manufacture? Are there any toxic side effects?

Assuming a new antibiotic is actually what’s needed, instead of using one of the many beta-lactams or combination therapies that already exist, generating the candidate is the first and easiest step of a long and expensive process to developing a novel drug.

Microsoft Previews Linux Containers That Run In Windows

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Microsoft has released a public preview of Windows Subsystem for Linux (WSL) containers, adding a built-in command-line tool and API for running Linux containers directly inside Windows applications without third-party software. The update also introduces faster file access, improved networking and memory management, plus integration with Defender, Intune, and VS Code. The Register reports:
WSL has always been a handy way to run Linux workloads from Windows, and is particularly convenient for Linux developers who must comply with corporate edicts to use a Windows device. The CLI for end-to-end container workflows furthers this. Microsoft stated, “WSL containers make it easier for developers and organizations to build, test, and run containerized workloads while benefiting from the security, manageability, and integration of the Windows platform.”

Alternatively, you could run your preferred Linux distribution natively, but that might not be an option, particularly if an organization is keen on the “security, manageability, and integration of the Windows platform.” And this is an important point. WSL’s existing Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (MDE) has been updated (in private preview) to be aware of Linux container events, and there are settings in Intune for managing WSL containers. Support is also in a pre-release version of VS Code, where the Docker path in the dev container settings can be changed to wslc.

There is also a new default file system for WSL container that Microsoft claims makes Windows file access twice the speed. So, going from terribly slow to just slow? We’ll wait until general availability is reached before passing judgment. There’s a new default networking mode to improve compatibility and better memory reclaim techniques. However, none of these tweaks will be enabled by default in WSL. Microsoft wrote, “Since these changes touch mission critical paths like file system access and network, for now they are enabled just in WSL container.”

Why would anybody sane do this?

By gweihir • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Containers already need almost full system administration, even is many people are in denial about that. Running Linux containers on underperforming, unstable, insecure Windows is about the peak of stupidity.

WIndows is useless

By Murdoch5 • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
If Microsoft has to keep building Linux functionality onto Windows, just convert Windows into a user land for Linux. There is no reason to use Windows, in the very rare event Wine can’t run an application, and there is no superior replacement, such as LibreOffice, throw Windows into a VM, and run it that way. It’s astonishing the length Microsoft will go to, to keep a dead horse alive, but now they’re just replacing it with car parts, and trying to drive it on the freeway. Windows has failed, the experiment is over, Windows is a joke, and no professional would be caught using it, if they want to be taken seriously.

Re:WIndows is useless

By Murdoch5 • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

The problem is government. OK, nobody takes government IT seriously and for good reason, but they still need to interface with the government constantly. Since every fucking governmental entity in the USA is based on Windows and IBM, we’re all forced to be able to interoperate with those. Microsoft has deliberately made their Office suite non-interoperable with false standards that require epic effort to duplicate to a working extent.

This is absolutely true, and it drives me nuts! There is no reason to use broken, locked in file formats. Just before xmas, I emailed a government client a ODT file, and holy crap.... that literally triggered a security review meeting. “Why did you do this????” what? I use LibreOffice, that’s why, it wasn’t an attack, and I can’t open MS Office on my computer, even in the browser, it’s broken due to privacy extensions.

I’ve worked with senior IT in the US and Canadian government, the number of times I’ve seen them boot up Windows, then remote to a Linux or Unix box, make me laugh. Luckily, with the push from the EU, this might start changing.

Re: Ain’t nothing like the real thing baby.

By robot5x • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Microsoft hasn’t “embraced” anything, they just realized there’s higher quality software they can use for free because of the hard work of others.

Re:WIndows is useless

By Murdoch5 • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
There’s a known bug where Windows update can corrupt your UEFI. This can happen even if you block UEFI updates from Windows. The fix? You need a chip programmer to write the UEFI back onto it. Along with that bug, it can silently activate BitLocker, and not back the key up, bricking the system. This has happened at our company, multiple times, and do you think Microsoft ever rushed in to help? Not once!

County With 37 Data Centers Asks Schools To ‘Conserve Electricity’

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from 404 Media:
On June 26, the County Manager of Henrico County, Virginia, John Vithoulkas, sent an email to thousands of county employees asking them to help the local government conserve electricity. “Beginning July 1st, the rate we pay for electricity used in all Henrico County government and school facilities will increase dramatically — by 25%, increasing costs by an estimated $5 million next fiscal year. We anticipate more rate increases for electricity in the years ahead,” a copy of the email obtained by 404 Media said (emphasis his).

Henrico County is a community of more than 350,000 people in eastern Virginia just outside of Richmond. It also hosts 37 data centers and there are plans to build 17 more, including plans to convert hundreds of acres of Civil War battlefields into data centers. Thanks to its proximity to DC and vast amounts of land, Henrico County became a data center hub seemingly overnight and its services clients big and small. Meta built a data center there in 2017.

“To mitigate the impact of higher electric costs, I am asking that we, collectively, make slight adjustments to conserve electricity across our individual workspaces,” Vithoulkas wrote in the email. “Turn off your lights when leaving your workspace, including when you leave for the day. Turn off your computers/laptops at the end of each workday. If your workspace has windows, adjust the blinds to manage heat from sunlight. Unplug any appliances, chargers, or other electrical items when they are not in use. Please limit use of (or refrain altogether from using) space heaters. A typical space heater alone can cost the county from $150 to $300 per year in electricity costs.”
“Each dollar we can save by conserving electricity is another dollar the county can reinvest into staff and the services we provide our residents,” Vithoulkas email said.

Just charge the data center owners/operators

By Targon • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Since those data centers are a big reason for the cost of electricity going up, why not just make the data centers pay enough in local taxes to cover the utility price increases for government AND all the “regular” citizens? Give the people a tax cut for the amount they would get as a rebate from charging the data centers for what they are doing to the local populace.

utilities will always stick it to the little guy

By kencurry • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Here in San Diego, where water is a chronic issue, we’ve all been asked to cut use year over year. But our water bill goes up anyway. Last justification? we don’t use enough to justify discounts, so they had to raise our rates!

Re:We’re being lied to about these data centers

By CubicleZombie • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

My small town planning commission voted for a data center, despite public outcry. Afterwards, one of the member’s wife took a job with Amazon corporate and he resigned. They don’t even hide it.

I recently got a letter from the water authority that I’m supposed to turn off the sink while I’m brushing my teeth and I’ll get fined if I wash my car.

Re: Not a bright idea

By homerbrew • Score: 5, Informative Thread
The problem with your argument, that smarter people just stay home, is off base. By NOT protesting and showing your legislators you are against what they are doing, you are instead, sending them the signal that it is OK and to keep doing what they are doing. Sure it is âoesaferâ to stay home, but that doesn’t make it âoesafeâ for you when some armed, masked, law enforcement officers are gunning for you, because you just happen to be driving near them (like to pick your kids up).

Re:Color me surprised…

By Brain-Fu • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

But still far too much.

Buildings still need to be built, and its hard work. So is building and maintaining sewer lines, power lines, cell phone networks etc.

Food is still grown by human farmers. A few farmers can make a whole lot of food, but those farmers have to work hard to do it. The same goes for everything else farmed or derived from livestock.

The factories that produce all our consumer trinkets still need a lot of human operators.

The list goes on and on.

Even if we did cease all overproduction and re-organize labor to make only what we need (presumably with extra saved up for emergencies), there would be far too much human labor required for it to be accomplished without paying the laborers in proportion to their effort and the rarity of their skill set. Asking them to put up with that “for the greater good” will result in the exact same consequences we consistently see when we try this (which is to say, failure, starvation, and violence).

South Korea To Spend $1 Trillion On More Memory Chip Production, Humanoid Robots

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica:
South Korea’s government and top tech companies are committing $1 trillion to several flagship megaprojects that could bolster global memory chip supply, build new AI data centers and spur commercial deployment of humanoid robots by 2028. […] “We must secure the core elements of AI faster than any other country,” said South Korean President Lee Jae Myung in a televised speech on June 29, as reported by BBC News and other media outlets. “Semiconductors, physical AI, and AI data centers are the triple axis for a great leap forward.” […]

The most costly of the megaprojects involves Samsung and SK Hynix committing $585 billion to building new chip fabrication plants in the southwest provinces of South Korea, along with boosting semiconductor fab construction in the Seoul capital region, according to Reuters. The government’s goal is to double South Korea’s production of dynamic random-access memory (DRAM) within five years. […] The second flagship megaproject involves a $357 billion investment by the South Korean tech companies SK Group, GS Group, and Naver into building large-scale AI data centers in more outlying provinces, including South Chungcheong Province in the west, Gangwon Province in the east, and the North and South Jeolla Provinces in the southwest corner of South Korea.

The third flagship megaproject revolves around the South Korean government assigning a “national strategic industry” designation to physical AI — the AI systems that enable robots and self-driving vehicles to interact more autonomously with the real world. The government aims to develop a Korean “general-purpose foundation model” based on a world model to support robots within three years, according to The Chosun Daily. Hyundai Motor Company has also committed $5.8 billion to build a robot manufacturing facility and AI data center in the Saemangeum region of North Jeolla Province in the southwest, The Chosun Daily reported.

The South Korean automaker has already been helping Boston Dynamics — the US robotics company it acquired in 2021 — use the South Korean supply chain in scaling up manufacturing to produce 30,000 Atlas humanoid robots each year by 2028. Similarly, the South Korean government announced it would aim to commercialize humanoid robots in 10 major industries by 2028, along with training 10,000 human workers as “AI robotics specialists” over the next five years, Reuters reported.

oh look

By drinkypoo • Score: 3 Thread

Well, at least SOMEONE has decided to find out whether it’s a bubble or not the hard way.

US Supreme Court Rules Geofence Warrants Require Constitutional Privacy Protections

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 (PDF) in Chatrie v United States (No. 25-112) that geofence warrants sweeping up smartphone location data constitute searches under the Fourth Amendment. The Court found that individuals have a “reasonable expectation of privacy” in such data, even when the tracking covers only a brief period or records movements in public. “An individual has a reasonable expectation of privacy in records about his cell phone’s location, and police intrude on that constitutionally protected interest when they demand the information — even though for only a limited time, and from a third-party tech company,” wrote Justice Elena Kagan. Longtime Slashdot reader schwit1 submitted the story. The Guardian reports:
The use of geofence warrants is widespread, and gives law enforcement agencies the power to compel tech companies to hand over sensitive cell phone data from people at or near crime scenes. The warrants allow police and the FBI to collect this information from individuals within the radius of a virtual “fence” during a particular timeframe. But they are not restricted to requesting data for precise targets.

The Chatrie case focuses on local police’s pursuit of an armed bank robber in Richmond, Virginia. He fled with $195,000. Law enforcement tracked Okello Chatrie down through their use of geofence warrants. Chatrie had opted in to an optional Google “location history” feature that documented his location every few minutes. He was eventually sentenced to 12 years in prison, after pleading guilty. Chatrie’s lawyers argued that this search was overly broad and violated his fourth amendment rights, which protects individuals from “unreasonable search and seizure.” Lawyers said that police’s use of geofence warrants amounted to an official “search” under the fourth amendment, and didn’t meet the constitution’s requirements for one.

The government had argued that accessing only a short amount of cellphone location information means this tactic does not count as a fourth amendment search and accordingly, should not be afforded the same privacy protections. But the judges in the majority disagreed. The judges in the majority opinion also wrote that the government’s characterization of generating location history as a voluntary choice is “meritless.” They suggested that people aren’t choosing to share private information with third parties and the government “just by doing the ordinary thing cellphone users do.” “The point of carrying smartphones is to use what is on them,” including the apps and services they provide — many of which use location data to customize a user’s experience, they said.

[…] While the majority opinion noted that police conducted a fourth amendment search by accessing Chatrie’s location history data, they noted that the court of appeals will weigh in on whether the “search was reasonable, meaning that each of its steps was properly described with particularity and found to be supported by probable cause.” Law enforcement has said they need geofence warrants to find suspects and witnesses — after reaching dead ends. The US government, for its part, has argued that people can’t have a “reasonable expectation of privacy” when they are in public and have allowed a third party company, such as Google, to collect and analyze phone location data.

alito barrett and thomas dissent

By Anonymous Coward • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

if you agree with this decision then thank the liberals

Re:Don’t look! Don’t look!

By TWX • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Damn, I looked. Who else would be self important enough to continuously log their location? And then stupid enough to rob a bank?

Just because someone is stupid doesn’t mean that they aren’t subject to specific protections under law.

Ernesto Miranda, for whom the Miranda Warning is named, was by accounts a terrible person. Miranda’s conviction was thrown out on those technical grounds that his confession should not have been permitted, then he was retried and convicted of the crime without his confession as evidence. Once he was released from prison he died in a bar fight.

The point of protections are that they apply to everyone, guilty or innocent, and are supposed to regulate the way that the legal system all the way from the patrolman to the attorney general behave. That doesn’t mean that criminals aren’t still criminals, but it does mean that the government has to provide proper justification for its actions against persons. If someone really did commit a crime then the government should be able to show cause, and this keeps everyone else from being scrutinized when the government has no business scrutinizing.

Re:alito barrett and thomas dissent

By kqs • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

20 years ago, which was a few years after conservatives supported the Patriot Act which greatly increased govt surveillance of US citizens? Yeah, no real changes. The folks who want the police state now are the folks who have always wanted the police state (mostly through some idiotic idea that THE OTHER will be persecuted, but never themselves).

Automated license plate readers need to be next

By blastard • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

ALPR needs to be the next warrantless tracking case before the court. It is one thing for a private company to know which vehicles enter and exit their parking structure and something completely different for government to track a vehicle as it travels throughout the day.

Re:alito barrett and thomas dissent

By jacks smirking reven • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Let me be the Republican translator for you:

“Activist Judge” == “Judge who gives opinion I don’t agree with”

Just like “Free and fair election” == “Election I win, otherwise it’s rigged”

Remembering How Microsoft’s Fake Windows Error Ended In a $280 Million Secret Settlement

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot
Slashdot reader joshuark summarizes this walk down memory lane from the tech site MakeUseOf:
Facing real competition from Digital Research’s DR DOS, Microsoft secretly embedded a sabotaging mechanism known as “AARD code” into beta versions of Windows 3.1 to prevent it from running on Digital Research’s competing DR DOS operating system.
This code triggered fake, alarming error messages to convince developers that DR DOS was unstable… Although Microsoft disabled the feature in the final retail release, the California-based firm Caldera, Inc., which had acquired DR DOS assets, sued Microsoft for anti-competitive practices.
Microsoft settled the lawsuit out of court in 2000 for $280 million, a figure that remained sealed until it was unsealed in 2009.

Re:$280 mil for something they didn’t do?

By douglasfir77 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

In U.S. law, you can be charged with criminal conspiracy even if the planned crime never actually happens. Conspiracy is considered an “inchoate” offense, meaning it is a crime before the target crime is completed.

But in this case they did commit the crime.

Re:$280 mil for something they didn’t do?

By DarkOx • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

They did it in the pre-release software knowing that the issues would get picked up by the tech press. Remember this was Windows 3.1 era. Most Windows/Dos users were not internet users.

People relied on what they read in things like PC Mag and Byte, yes even corporate IT decision makers. Microsoft knew that those sorts of publications would leap on the opportunity to test pre-release Windows, would actually try it out on a variety of PC hardware and DOS versions. These were monthly publications at most and would be unlikely to give space to a second review until after the RTM version hit store shelves.

The message would be clear, for a smooth experience on the new Windows, you better plan an upgrade to MSDOS 5. I know a lot of people jumped from MSDOS 3.x to 5.0 at the same time they bought Windows 3.1[1]. So it worked..

By the time everyone figured out Windows 3.1[1] was just fine on DR DOS, they’d already switched MSDOS or already paid to upgrade to MSDOS 5, so Digital Research was not getting the users back.

Re:Oh, right!

By AleRunner • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

The irony here is that the true evil has been missed from the story. Microsoft was deliberately trying to fund Caldera to damage Linux. This settlement was an effective way to transfer money from one company to another, avoiding taxes, avoiding scrutiny and settling an outstanding potential future Microsoft liability.

Re:2009

By haruchai • Score: 5, Informative Thread

the SCO/IBM/Novell case & the tracking done by Pamela Jones of Groklaw was big news on Slashdot for a very long time

Re:Oh, right!

By dryeo • Score: 5, Informative Thread

While your point is valid, there were differences in some things such as how IBM handled their anti-trust case compared to MS. IBM had a consent agreement with the DOJ and mostly followed it with one result the rise of MS, which at least partially due to IBM’s consent agreement got a very good deal on DOS, along with a more open philosophy from IBM. Compare to MS who immediately tried to work around their anti-trust agreement and got political resulting in Bush basically cancelling their anti-trust case.
A good example was the competing operating systems on the PC in the mid 90’s.
You had OS/2 (v2+) which during install, if another OS was on the system, installed a Boot manager, called BootManager, which upon boot allowed you to multi-boot, DOS, Windows, OS/2, Linux etc. Meanwhile with MS, it monopolized your HD. Install Win9x on your multi-booting HD and at the end of the install, it would inform you that it had wiped your OS/2 install. No warning, no mention of how a minute or 2 with fdisk could return your multi-boot environment. Imagine, you test a new OS and after installing it, you are informed all your stuff is permanently gone, even though it actually was still there.
Another thing with installing Win9x was that if you had OS/2 installed, it didn’t worry about if you had a serial number to enter during install. This continued their attitude that a pirated version of Windows was better then a paid for competitors OS.
OS/2 also mostly followed standards rather then creating their own like MS.