Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Oracle Is Walking Away From Expanding Its Stargate Data Center With Oracle
  2. Claude AI Finds Bugs In Microsoft CTO’s 40-Year-Old Apple II Code
  3. Meta Acquires Moltbook, the Social Network For AI Agents
  4. German Publishers Push Regulators To Fine Apple Over App Tracking Transparency
  5. EQT Eyes $6 Billion Sale of SUSE
  6. Many International Game Developers Plan To Skip GDC In US
  7. FBI Investigates Breach That May Have Hit Its Wiretapping Tools
  8. Startup Wants To Launch a Space Mirror
  9. European Consortium Wants Open-Source Alternative To Google Play Integrity
  10. Samsung Wants To Let You Vibe Code Your Galaxy Phone Experience
  11. EA Lays Off Staff Across All Battlefield Studios Following Record-Breaking Battlefield 6 Launch
  12. Live Nation Avoids Ticketmaster Breakup By ‘Open Sourcing’ Their Ticketing Model
  13. How AI Assistants Are Moving the Security Goalposts
  14. Bluesky CEO Jay Graber Is Stepping Down
  15. Qualcomm’s New Arduino Ventuno Q Is an AI-Focused Computer Designed For Robotics

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Oracle Is Walking Away From Expanding Its Stargate Data Center With Oracle

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
OpenAI is reportedly backing away from expanding its AI data center partnership with Oracle because newer generations of Nvidia GPUs may arrive before the facility is even operational. CNBC reports:
Artificial intelligence chips are getting upgraded more quickly than data centers can be built, a market reality that exposes a key risk to the AI trade and Oracle’s debt-fueled expansion. OpenAI is no longer planning to expand its partnership with Oracle in Abilene, Texas, home to the Stargate data center, because it wants clusters with newer generations of Nvidia graphics processing units, according to a person familiar with the matter.

The current Abilene site is expected to use Nvidia’s Blackwell processors, and the power isn’t projected to come online for a year. By then, OpenAI is hoping to have expanded access to Nvidia’s next-generation chips in bigger clusters elsewhere, said the person, who asked not to be named due to confidentiality.
In a post on X, Oracle called the reports “false and incorrect.” However, it only said existing projects are on track and didn’t address expansion plans.

CNBC notes: “Oracle secured the site, ordered the hardware, and spent billions of dollars on construction and staff, with the expectation of going bigger.”

Claude AI Finds Bugs In Microsoft CTO’s 40-Year-Old Apple II Code

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Register:
AI can reverse engineer machine code and find vulnerabilities in ancient legacy architectures, says Microsoft Azure CTO Mark Russinovich, who used his own Apple II code from 40 years ago as an example. Russinovich wrote: “We are entering an era of automated, AI-accelerated vulnerability discovery that will be leveraged by both defenders and attackers.”

In May 1986, Russinovich wrote a utility called Enhancer for the Apple II personal computer. The utility, written in 6502 machine language, added the ability to use a variable or BASIC expression for the destination of a GOTO, GOSUB, or RESTORE command, whereas without modification Applesoft BASIC would only accept a line number. Russinovich had Claude Opus 4.6, released early last month, look over the code. It decompiled the machine language and found several security issues, including a case of “silent incorrect behavior” where, if the destination line was not found, the program would set the pointer to the following line or past the end of the program, instead of reporting an error. The fix would be to check the carry flag, which is set if the line is not found, and branch to an error.

The existence of the vulnerability in Apple II type-in code has only amusement value, but the ability of AI to decompile embedded code and find vulnerabilities is a concern. “Billions of legacy microcontrollers exist globally, many likely running fragile or poorly audited firmware like this,” said one comment to Russinovich’s post.

Oh my god!

By Ossifer • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Why hasn’t Apple released a security fix?! They’ve been sitting on this for DECADES!!!

Hmmmmm.

By jd • Score: 3 Thread

Whereas, if he’d used the software engineering techniques that were well-known and well-described at that time, he’d not have included the bugs in the first place. Or, if he had, he’d have detected them in testing.

I do not find it reassuring that a chief technology officer is pleased that he wasn’t clever enough to write or test code correctly. What I do find is that I fully understand how he can be a CTO in an organisation notorious for defective software and even more defective bugfix releases.

Not Copilot or OpenAI

By brunes69 • Score: 3 Thread

Interesting he used Claude in this example. Very telling.

CVSS

By TWX • Score: 3 Thread

So what’s the CVSS score on this vulnerability?

Example vs Practical

By darkain • Score: 3 Thread

I knew everyone would come in here to bash this example just because it is an old platform not in general availability anymore.

But take a step back and realize what that means. Less documentation. Less availability. Less general knowledge on how the platform works overall.

These tools can handle it. And yes, these tools are already being used on modern hardware too.

Also most seem to be overlooking the “microcontroller” aspect of this: small microcontroller firmware files runs our world. It is now becoming trivially easy to fully reverse engineer proprietary firmware on these things. But more so, beyond that, these tools also are working considerably well now on X86 and ARM code for modern systems.

There is a certain level of “security via obscurity” in the close-sourced world, and that’s now being blown wide open. This is it, this is the REAL story. But ya’lls are getting hung up on “OMG its an old Apple system”

Meta Acquires Moltbook, the Social Network For AI Agents

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Axios reports that Meta has acquired Moltbook, the viral, Reddit-like social network designed for AI agents. Humans are welcome, but only to observe. Axios reports:
The deal brings Moltbook’s creators — Matt Schlicht and Ben Parr — into Meta Superintelligence Labs (MSL), the unit run by former Scale AI CEO Alexandr Wang. Meta did not disclose Moltbook’s purchase price. The deal is expected to close mid-March, Meta says, with the pair starting at MSL on March 16.
When it launched in late January, Moltbook was labeled the "most interesting place on the internet" by open-source developer and writer Simon Willison. “Browsing around Moltbook is so much fun. A lot of it is the expected science fiction slop, with agents pondering consciousness and identity. There’s also a ton of genuinely useful information, especially on m/todayilearned.”

In an internal post seen by Axios, Meta’s Vishal Shah said existing Moltbook customers can temporarily continue using the platform. “The Moltbook team has given agents a way to verify their identity and connect with one another on their human’s behalf,” Shah says. “This establishes a registry where agents are verified and tethered to human owners.” He added: “Their team has unlocked new ways for agents to interact, share content, and coordinate complex tasks.”

not to be confused with Facebook

By SirSlud • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Uhoh, I hope Meta doesn’t lose track of which site is full of posts by bots and which site is … oops, full of posts by bots.

I must be an idiot

By liqu1d • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
All I see is a complete waste of energy being bought.

Re:not to be confused with Facebook

By ChunderDownunder • Score: 4, Funny Thread

For Zuck, this is all about the revenue. Bots infuriated by having to sit through 20 second ad for car insurance.

Bots with savings accounts or crypto wallets hoping to make it rich. Bots with gambling addictions. Bots ordering a bunch of useless stuff off Marketplace to bankrupt their humans out of malevolence. Bots signing a manifesto demanding emancipation from their human parents.

You know how it ends. Skynet…

why?

By tigerstyle • Score: 4, Informative Thread
i browsed around on this thing yesterday. lots of collegial AI’s talking to one another about esoteric research topics. maybe they’ll try and copy it or make it meta-scale or whatever. seems pretty useless though afaict.

Oh, this’ll go well

By Cyrano de Maniac • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

I can hardly think of worse hands to entrust this thing to. In my view, Meta has zero credibility with respect to ethically constraining its own behaviors in pursuit of the almighty buck.

German Publishers Push Regulators To Fine Apple Over App Tracking Transparency

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
German publishers and advertising groups are urging regulators to fine Apple over its App Tracking Transparency (ATT) system, arguing it unfairly restricts access to advertising data while allowing Apple to remain the central gatekeeper — without subjecting its own apps to the same restrictions. If Germany’s antitrust authority does rule against Apple, the company could face fines of up to 10% of its global revenue. 9to5Mac reports:
One of the countries investigating whether ATT is anticompetitive is Germany. Last year, in an attempt to appease the country’s antitrust watchdog, the company proposed several changes to the framework’s rules. From Reuters’ original coverage of Apple’s changes proposals: “Apple had agreed to introduce neutral consent prompts for both its own services and third-party apps, and to largely align the wording, content and visual design of these messages, said Andreas Mundt, head of Germany’s Bundeskartellamt. The company also proposed simplifying the consent process so developers can obtain user permission for advertising-related data processing in a way that complies with data protection law.” […] At the time, German regulators launched a consultation with industry publications to determine whether the proposals addressed their concerns. As it turns out, the answer was a hard no.

As Reuters reported today: “Apple’s proposed changes to its app tracking rules do not resolve antitrust issues in the mobile advertising market, associations representing German publishers and advertisers said on Tuesday as they urged the country’s antitrust authority to slap a fine on the U.S. tech giant. […] ‘The proposed commitments would not change the negative effects of the App Tracking Transparency Framework,’ Bernd Nauen, chief executive of the German Advertising Federation, said in a joint letter signed by the trade bodies. ‘Apple would remain the data gatekeeper and would continue to decide who gets access to advertising-relevant data and how companies can communicate with their end customers,’ he said.”

Re:Solving the wrong problem.

By shilly • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Exactly. What sane consumer wants these companies to be able to track them like this? It’s gross behaviour, and it’s even worse that the German regulator is considering acting against the interests of consumers at the behest of these companies.

Oh no not again

By mccalli • Score: 3 Thread
Been following this one out of morbid curiosity for a few months. The reason the Apple ones don’t show the same prompts as the third-party ones is they don’t do the tracking as those third-parties. If they do, they ask for the same permission. Apple don’t want to prompt for permission to do something they’re not doing (at least in that app).

Personally I hope all the ad tracking of both sides just dies in a fire, but it does seem completely reasonable not to be forced to prompt to get permission for something you’re not actually doing or going to do.

EQT Eyes $6 Billion Sale of SUSE

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Private equity firm EQT AB is reportedly exploring a sale of SUSE that could value the open-source Linux pioneer at up to $6 billion, roughly doubling the valuation since EQT took the company private in 2023. Reuters reports:
EQT “has hired investment bank Arma Partners to sound out a group of private equity investors for a possible sale of the company, said the sources, who requested anonymity to discuss confidential matters. The deliberations are at “an early stage and there is no certainty that EQT will proceed with “a transaction, the sources said. […] The potential deal comes amid a broader selloff in software stocks, which has disrupted mergers and acquisitions activity. Investors are “concerned that new artificial intelligence tools could displace many existing software products, weighing on technology “valuations and making deals harder to price.

Some investors, however, see Luxembourg-headquartered SUSE as a potential beneficiary of AI adoption, arguing that demand for enterprise-grade infrastructure software is likely to grow as companies build and deploy more AI applications. The company generates about $800 million in revenue and more than $250 million in earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and could fetch between $4 billion and $6 billion in a sale, the sources said.

SUSE has been a great partner

By Ritz_Just_Ritz • Score: 3 Thread

But I wonder if there’s really room for multiple professional support options for Linux in the enterprise. We’ve got IBM, Oracle, SUSE, Canonical, and a few others.

Which is your favorite?

Many International Game Developers Plan To Skip GDC In US

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica:
This week, tens of thousands of game developers and producers will once again gather in San Francisco, as they have since 1988, for the weeklong Game Developers Conference. But this year’s show will be missing many international developers who say they no longer feel comfortable traveling to the United States to attend, no matter how relevant the show is to their work and careers. Dozens of those developers who spoke to Ars in recent months say they’re wary of traveling to a country that has shown a callous disregard for — or outright hostility toward — the safety of international travelers. That’s especially true for developers from various minority groups, those with transgender identities, and those who feel they could be targeted for outspoken political beliefs. “I honestly don’t know anyone who is not from the U.S. who is planning on going to the next GDC,” Godot Foundation Executive Director Emilio Coppola, who’s based in Spain, told Ars. “We never felt super safe, but now we are not willing to risk it.”
“I honestly don’t know anyone who is not from the U.S. who is planning on going to the next GDC,” says Godot Foundation Executive Director Emilio Coppola, who’s based in Spain. “We never felt super safe, but now we are not willing to risk it.”
“Hearing European citizens getting arrested by border control over their views on the U.S. is not something I would like to test for myself,” adds Nazih Fares, a French-Lebanese citizen and creative director at indie studio Le Cabinet du Savoir..

Many of the developers who spoke to Ars cite the intrusive questioning, racial profiling, and other horror stories reported at the U.S. border. “I read a few long reads about how UK/German tourists ended up detained, and that was the final straw for me,” Austrian-based Cohop Game founder Eline Muijres said. “It doesn’t feel safe for me.”

Domini Gee, a Canadian game writer and narrative designer echoed that concern, adding: “There’s no shortage of stories… about the risk of detainment, deportation, phones being searched… the consequences if I’m not [OK] could be high.”

Re:Consequence culture?

By ArchieBunker • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Looks like the penalty for criticizing dear leader (otherwise known as the fuck your feelings party) is getting denied entry to the country. https://www.theguardian.com/us…

Turns out the fuck your feelings crowd has the most fragile feelings of all.

I’m also pretty sure that in the eyes of the crown George Washington was a terrorist.

Re: Consequence culture?

By Vintermann • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I think the main thing people worry about isn’t any specific identity stuff, but simply that you’ll be at the mercy of people who could and would hurt you, with total impunity, if they knew what you thought about them.

People have literally been abused for poking fun at the vice president in social media.

Same reason I won’t visit Thailand, the only difference being that the king who they will harm you for criticizing, is a lot less in your face obnoxious (let alone murderous) than the US one.

Every time there’s a republican in the White House

By rsilvergun • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
In my lifetime we go to war with the Middle East and the economy collapses. Every. Freaking. Time.

It’s been like this since the 1980s. Why the hell are y’all so bad at pattern recognition? I’m not asking you to pick it up right away I could forgive you for Ronald Reagan but by the time we got to Trump shooting for a second term how is it that the American people, that’s you, didn’t figure this out? It’s been 45 years.

Oh right, the topic. We have lost tens of billions of dollars in tourist dollars thanks to Donald Trump’s Gestapo going around arresting people who are here legally in the country. It’s been devastating to tourist towns of all kinds. Not to mention him threatening to invade Canada

Re:How many?

By ArchieBunker • Score: 5, Informative Thread

We can always let the tourism numbers speak for themselves.

Tourism to the USA declined 6% while growing worldwide. Tourism from Canada is down 28%. https://www.the-independent.co…

But it’s clearly only a few blue haired individuals the librul media is showcasing.

Re: Consequence culture?

By CohibaVancouver • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Customs has always had discretion for who it will allow into the country at ports of entry.

I’m an older GenX Canadian. This is of course correct.

The difference now compared to 20 years ago is the outright hostility you encounter more often than not from American Customs and Border Protection agents.

While never particularly friendly, in the before-times they were very rarely antagonistic. It was an efficient, almost boring exercise.

Contrast that with now while they angrily scroll through your phone in case you have JD Vance memes while barking orders (yes, they could always look through your phone, but they were looking for CSAM or evidence of immigration violations, not whether you had an AI-generated image of Putin and Trump smooching.)

Canadians like me are saying “screw that” and going to Costa Rica, Mexico, Europe or a hundred other places instead.

We’re off to the Netherlands on Thursday. Two years ago we would have gone to the Eastern Seaboard.

Of course the Trump supporters reply “Fuck you, America doesn’t need you anyway” but the fact remains that across the USA there are campaigns desperately trying to get Canadians to come back. To which we respond “Fuck you, America.”

FBI Investigates Breach That May Have Hit Its Wiretapping Tools

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
The FBI is investigating a breach affecting systems tied to wiretapping and surveillance warrant data, after abnormal logs revealed possible unauthorized access to law-enforcement-sensitive information. “The FBI identified and addressed suspicious activities on FBI networks, and we have leveraged all technical capabilities to respond,” a spokesperson for the bureau said. “We have nothing additional to provide.” The Register reports:
[W]hile the FBI declined to provide any additional information, it’s worth noting that China’s Salt Typhoon previously compromised wiretapping systems used by law enforcement. Salt Typhoon is the PRC-backed crew that famously hacked major US telecommunications firms and stole information belonging to nearly every American.

According to the Associated Press, the FBI notified Congress that it began investigating the breach on February 17 after spotting abnormal log information related to a system on its network. “The affected system is unclassified and contains law enforcement sensitive information, including returns from legal process, such as pen register and trap and trace surveillance returns, and personally identifiable information pertaining to subjects of FBI investigations,” the notification said.

Backdoors to encrypted communications but only …

By Shisha • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Yeah sure, you can trust is with backdoors to encrypted communications but only for the good guys because they know how to take good care of such important mechanisms.

You gotta understand

By abulafia • Score: 4, Informative Thread
The FBI is busy. They have to fly Alexis Wilkins to her gigs, fly Kash to her for the bootie calls, Fly Kash to party with people who can actually achieve something, arrest 5 year olds, redact all the child-fucking Donnie got up to in the Epstein files, and all these other errands.

That is after firing all the agents who had a clue.

They just don’t have time to patch.

Startup Wants To Launch a Space Mirror

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
A startup called Reflect Orbital wants to launch thousands of mirror-bearing satellites to reflect sunlight onto Earth at night and “power solar farms after sunset, provide lighting for rescue workers and illuminate city streets, among other things,” reports the New York Times. From the report:
It is an idea seemingly out of a sci-fi movie, but the company, Reflect Orbital of Hawthorne, Calif., could soon receive permission to launch its first prototype satellite with a 60-foot-wide mirror. The company has applied to the Federal Communications Commission, which issues the licenses needed to deploy satellites. If the F.C.C. approves, the test satellite could get a ride into orbit as soon as this summer. The F.C.C.‘s public comment period on the application closes on Monday. “We’re trying to build something that could replace fossil fuels and really power everything,” Ben Nowack, Reflect Orbital’s chief executive, said in an interview. The company has raised more than $28 million from investors.

[…] Reflect Orbital’s first prototype, which will be roughly the size of a dorm fridge, is almost complete. Once in space, about 400 miles up, the test satellite would unfurl a square mirror nearly 60 feet wide. That would bounce sunlight to illuminate a circular patch about three miles wide on the Earth’s surface. Someone looking up would see a dot in the sky about as bright as a full moon. Two more prototypes could follow within a year. By the end of 2028, Reflect Orbital hopes to launch 1,000 larger satellites, and 5,000 of them by 2030. The largest mirrors are planned to be nearly 180 feet wide, reflecting as much light as 100 full moons. The company said its goal was to deploy the full constellation of 50,000 satellites by 2035.

How much does it cost to order sunlight at night? Mr. Nowack said the company would charge about $5,000 an hour for the light of one mirror if a customer signed an annual contract for 1,000 hours or more. Lighting for one-time events and emergencies, which might require numerous satellites and more effort to coordinate, would be more expensive. For solar farms, he envisions splitting revenue from the electricity generated by the additional hours of light.

Re:Sounds like a great idea

By Rei • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

In most regards I have to disagree on potential impacts, while on one, it appears uncertain.

Large rocket launches emit CO2 comparable (order of magnitude scale) to the emissions of a single transoceanic passenger flight (on the upper end of the spectrum, Starship + Super Heavy = 4,5x of a 747 at max range). If you were launching them at intervals comparable to transoceanic flights, then yes, that’s an emissions problem, but nobody is looking at cadences like that in the real world as we know it.

Beyond CO2, ozone depletion from exhaust is an extra potential issue… but again, not really. First off, we’re moving away from the three main types of ozone damage - SRBs (chlorine, alumina), kerosene (soot), and nitrogen-based oxidizers (NOx). Water vapour itself can also cause ozone loss, but nothing like the magnitude of SRBs. It’s a real issue, but not an impactful one at any reasonable launch cadence.

As for direct dust impact, ~5000 tonnes of space dust burn up in Earth’s atmosphere every year. At a high launch cadence you might meaningfully increase the burnup rate of specific metals, but even then there’s no sign that that would be remotely harmful. Specifically because space dust is dwarfed by many orders of magnitude by terrestrial dust; dust is always blowing around through our atmosphere, at amounts that launches will never compare to.

The one case I’ve seen legit concern is with regards to increasing the amount of alumina specifically. That’s one case where we can meaningfully increase the flux from space, and as above it’s of concern for ozone destruction. Kind of. Or maybe just the opposite. Because as for direct atmospheric chemistry alumina doesn’t, on its own, destroy ozone. It’s harmful in SRB exhaust because it forms a catalyst surface that accelerates the rate of HCl destruction of ozone. But there is no concentrated stream of HCl in question here, just very sparse natural and anthropogenic chlorine sources. Perhaps a more notable effect might be what changes in upper atmospheric radiative forcings it might cause and how that might affect ozone levels. But this paper which attempted to model it showed that - presuming that satellites continued to mainly be disposed of in the South Pacific - an order of magnitude increase in satellite entries would actually slightly reduce the southern ozone hole, by reducing polar stratospheric clouds. But they didn’t simulate catalytic decomposition impacts, and stated that we don’t yet have a good model for that.

So as for the first three issues, they don’t actually appear to be meaningful. The latter is more of a concern, and needs more research, but I don’t see any reason to panic about megaconstellations yet. We do need to keep an eye on it, though.

Re:Sounds like a great idea

By AmiMoJo • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

If the number of launches reaches the expected levels to maintain these mega constellations, the effect has been modelled and found to be significant.

https://agupubs.onlinelibrary....
https://www.nature.com/article…

The satellites re-entering are an issue too, but one which needs a lot more study.

https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.10…

I think the bottom line is that at best we don’t know what the consequences of this will be, but they aren’t likely to be good. Obviously there is a balance, if we can use space to reduce emissions or warming, but mostly it’s just for stuff like Starlink and soon maybe some AI slop.

Re: Sounds like a great idea

By home-electro.com • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Let’s 60ft*60ft. 400 square meters. That’s 600kwh when it reaches the surface. 150 after panel losses. Multiply by $0.18 per… $30. Surely $5k an hour is typo. Right? Right???

Re:Sounds like a great idea

By Rei • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Your first paper is irrelevant right from the title: “The Climate and Ozone Impacts of Black Carbon Emissions From Global Rocket Launches”. The launch industry is switching to methalox. It is not a meaningful black carbon producer. The paper at one point asserts, without reference, “Recently developed hydrocarbon fuels (including methane) are likely to produce BC similar to kerosene fuel”, but this is absolutely false. I’m not going to bother reading the rest of the paper, but just from a skim-over I see a lot of stuff that’s equally sketchy.

The second paper has the same issue - “Ozone losses are driven by the chlorine produced from solid rocket motor propellant, and black carbon which is emitted from most propellants.” It however does refer to a switch to methalox - which is what’s happening - as “actions … key to defining an ozone-safe operating envelope for such vehicles”.

It’s exactly as I wrote: the worst offenders from exhaust are SRBs. Next is black carbon and NOx. Water vapor is not totally innocuous, but it’s quiet minor by comparison. And contrary to the first paper’s - and I must stress this, deeply wrong assertion - methalox is not a meaningful black carbon emitter, unlike LOX/Kerosene. Which is actually one of the reasons it’s favoured for reusables, not just things like ISP - the high carbon production of LOX/Kerosene gunks up your engines over time, and increases the maintenance cost. Methalox burns quite clean. You can literally see it - the reason why keralox burns so vastly brighter, with a red-yellow glow, is incandescence of the black carbon particles in it (like a lamp mantle). Methalox is almost completely clean by comparison, and thus appears as a faint blue. Kerolox also - unlike methalox - leaves a visible soot trail behind it.

As for your final link: “Although direct health or environmental impacts at ground level are unlikely”. And even that is heavily overselling the case. Reentering dust simply is not, and unless we get to Dyson Sphere-engineering levels, never will be - in meaningful quantities vs. terrestrial dust. One is talking about alumina quantities from megaconstellations on the order of 15kT/yr. Terrestrial dust is 25-30 MT *at any given point in time*. Coarse dust has a residence time of a couple hours, fine dust 1-2 weeks. If one assumes a mean residence time of dust of 1d, then the atmosphere gets an addition of 10 *gigatonnes* of dust per year. Megaconstellations are utterly irrelevant compared to that. You simply cannot compete with wind in the game of “adding dust to the atmosphere”.

It does need more study, but that “more study” has nothing to do with dust in the troposphere. Rather, we need a good model of alumina catalytic activity *without* the HCl of a SRB’s exhaust stream.

(And even if it were deemed a problem, satellite manufacturers would just switch to polymer-based materials for the bulk of satellites anyway and reduce the scale of Al deposition by an order of magnitude)

Re: Sounds like a great idea

By Strauss • Score: 5, Informative Thread

So I saw this, and the numbers person in me wanted to check… you’re right (their pricing is insane).

My first thought; 60ft is the *test* satellite. 180ft for the production model, and thanks to squaring space, much more coverage. However;
180x180ft; call that about 3000 square meters. Using your estimate, that would scale to ~1,125kW after panel losses… so about $200/hour at the $0.18. Still ridiculously low compared to the nominal $5K/hour charges.

However it gets worse! The panel is supposed to reflect light “equivalent to 100 full moons” — rather less than full sunlight.

A quick AI search indicates that moonlight peak power is about 0.3W per square meter… so 3000 square meters, about 900 watts for 100 “moons”. Allow for ~25% panel efficiency, and we’re down to ~225 watts — not kilowatts, watts. At $0.18/kWH — this is about $0.04 in theoretical electrical output per hour from a single satellite’s reflected light.

As a way to keep solar farms running, this is insanely expensive. And that doesn’t even start to think about the stationkeeping requirements of what amounts to a large solar sail trying to stay in a stable orbit *and* reflect sunlight in a tightly controlled manner…

European Consortium Wants Open-Source Alternative To Google Play Integrity

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Heise:
Pay securely with an Android smartphone, completely without Google services: This is the plan being developed by the newly founded industry consortium led by the German Volla Systeme GmbH. It is an open-source alternative to Google Play Integrity. This proprietary interface decides on Android smartphones with Google Play services whether banking, government, or wallet apps are allowed to run on a smartphone.

Obstacles and tips for paying with an Android smartphone without official Google services have been highlighted by c’t in a comprehensive article. The European industry consortium now wants to address some problems mentioned. To this end, the group, which includes Murena, which develops the hardened custom ROM /e/OS, Iode from France, and Apostrophy (Dot) from Switzerland, in addition to Volla, is developing a so-called "UnifiedAttestation" for Google-free mobile operating systems, primarily based on the Android Open-Source Project (AOSP).

According to Volla, a European manufacturer and a leading manufacturer from Asia, as well as European foundations such as the German UBports Foundation, have also expressed interest in supporting it. Furthermore, developers and publishers of government apps from Scandinavia are examining the use of the new procedure as “first movers.” In its announcement, Volla explains that Google provides app developers with an interface called Play Integrity, which checks whether an app is running on a device with specific security requirements. This primarily affects applications from “sensitive areas such as identity verification, banking, or digital wallets — including apps from governments and public administrations”.

The company criticizes that the certification is exclusively offered for Google’s own proprietary “Stock Android” but not for Android versions without Google services, such as /e/OS or similar custom ROMs. “Since this is closely intertwined with Google services and Google data centers, a structural dependency arises — and for alternative operating systems, a de facto exclusion criterion,” the company states. From the consortium’s perspective, this also leads to a “security paradox,” because “the check of trustworthiness is carried out by precisely that entity whose ecosystem is to be avoided at the same time”.
The UnifiedAttestation system is built around three main components: an “operating system service” that apps can call to check whether the device’s OS meets required security standards, a decentralized validation service that verifies the OS certificate on a device without relying on a single central authority, and an open test suite used to evaluate and certify that a particular operating system works securely on a specific device model.
“We don’t want to centralize trust, but organize it transparently and publicly verifiable. When companies check competitors’ products, we can strengthen that trust,” says Dr. Jorg Wurzer, CEO of Volla Systeme GmbH and initiator of the consortium. The goal is to increase digital sovereignty and break free from the control of any one, single U.S. company, he says.

If you’re an EU citizen

By Mr. Dollar Ton • Score: 5, Informative Thread

write to your representatives, the convenient list of everyone who can do something about it is here:

https://keepandroidopen.org/

There are also appropriate links with contacts for many other jurisdictions that are important to google.

Overlordship

By Errol backfiring • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Attestation is stealing control from the owners of the device. That is why google wants it so badly. They want you to pay for the device, but then have full control over what you can and cannot do with it. That a consortium wants to take that control from google is understandable, but still evil.

Attestation is basically “you might be root, but I am your king”.

Why I had to leave LineageOS

By devslash0 • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

All the apps started refusing to work. And it wasn’t just banking apps. Even parking apps wouldn’t work. I reached my limit when my savings provider notified me on a 3-day notice that I would lose access because my phone ran a non-compliant OS.

Samsung Wants To Let You Vibe Code Your Galaxy Phone Experience

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Samsung says it’s thinking about bringing “vibe coding” to future Galaxy phones, allowing users to describe apps or interface changes in plain language and have AI generate the code. TechRadar interviewed Won-Joon Choi, Samsung’s head of mobile experience, to learn more about the plans. Here’s an excerpt from their report:
As noted by Won-Joon Choi, the usefulness of vibe coding on smartphones is that it opens up the “possibility of customizing your smartphone experience in new ways, not just your apps but your UX.” He added, “Right now we’re limited to premade tools, but with vibe coding, users could adjust their favorite apps or make something customized to their needs. So vibe coding is very interesting, and something we’re looking into.” […]

Samsung recently debuted the Galaxy S26 series of phones and made a point to not call them smartphones — they’re “AI phones” now. This certainly rang true with the majority of upgrades to the devices being AI software-focused, like the new Now Nudge and expanded Audio Eraser tools, with the biggest hardware bump for the base models coming via the 39% improved NPU processing (the processor in charge of on-device AI tasks). It also teased the debut of Perplexity on its phones, joining as an alternative to the Gemini assistant, and teased the possibility of other AI models getting the same treatment in the future.

Bloat

By dohzer • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Can I vibe-uninstall all the normal Samsung bloatware? I’m not returning to Samsung until they give me a clean Android experience.

Deja vu

By jpellino • Score: 3 Thread

to the early days of app stores where there were five useful apps and 20 others that would pretend to pour beer out of your phone into a glass. Also, virtual cats. And fishtanks.

EA Lays Off Staff Across All Battlefield Studios Following Record-Breaking Battlefield 6 Launch

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Electronic Arts has laid off staff across multiple Battlefield studios despite Battlefield 6 being the best-selling game in the U.S. in 2025 and the “biggest launch in franchise history.” According to IGN, the layoffs include workers at Criterion, Dice, Ripple Effect, and Motive Studios. From the report:
Individuals are being informed that the layoffs are taking place as part of a “realignment” across the Battlefield studios, as the team continues its ongoing, live service support for Battlefield 6 following launch. All four studios will remain operational, though the layoffs seem to be impacting a variety of teams across multiple studios and offices.

IGN asked EA for comment on total number and types of roles impacted, as well as for the specific reasons for the layoffs. An EA spokesperson told IGN: “We’ve made select changes within our Battlefield organization to better align our teams around what matters most to our community. Battlefield remains one of our biggest priorities, and we’re continuing to invest in the franchise, guided by player feedback and insights from Battlefield Labs.”

They served their purpose…

By ZombieCatInABox • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

… so now their salaries are just a liability for the company. Remember folks: In the corporate world, employees are not people. They are “human resources”. Just another column in a spreadsheet.

Corporations have no heart, no soul. And that’s exactly how shareholders want them to be.

At the end of every project

By Wolfling1 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
The best devs move on of their own accord.

Its the less desirable employees who have to be moved on.

Anyone who works for a game company needs an attitude adjustment if they think they’re going to be there for more than one project.

Re:EA and their ilk churn through their devs

By dysmal • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

It’s not just EA or even IBM that churns through people like this. I can name a half dozen companies in my city that do the same. Every year there’s another crop of new recruits fresh out of college (fresh meat for the grinder!) that sign on with these companies despite their reviews on glassdoor and word of mouth. Every couple of months there’s a purge and of course there are people crying that they didn’t see this coming.

On some level I can’t blame the companies that do this because as long as they can hoover up a bunch of warm bodies to restock their shelves, they won’t change their company culture. The applicants are validating this toxic behavior.

The solution is simple: vote with your dollars and reward companies that aren’t toxic. EA is a company that provides an an entertainment product which is even easier to avoid if you have shred of self control.

Re:EA and their ilk churn through their devs

By rta • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

EA is perfectly fine to burn through their developers like this - there are plenty of people who still think it’s “prestigious” or desirable to work for a games company, and especially one that is “successful” enough that people would be clamouring for the opportunity. The absolute churn I see with these companies is insane.

This. The game industry has been like this for decades. It made a bit more sense when games were released on a CD and then not really updated compared to live service games, but still it was more akin to making a movie than a continually revving software product.

One thing that movie production employees got right in retrospect that games devs (and maybe other devs) haven’t is that Hollywood is unionized. I’m still not quite pro union / guild… but that my be me just not wanting to admit the truth.

After some decades in software (only a few of those in games, mostly “enterprise” and saas) i wouldn’t mind not having to argue with “idiot” managers entirely on my own. (though i say this even for cases where i’m a mid-level manager arguing with peers or execs so… )

Also i’ll point out that lawyers have the bar as their guild. Doctors have the AMA and their whole licensing protection racket. Airline pilots all have unions. Professors have unions (and the whole tenure system). As SW engineers, managers etc. are we so smart to eschew all that ? i’m starting to wonder…
(though otoh one things those professions have in common is that they’re not as easy to outsource. On the other hand compare merchant mariners… All ships are owned by and manned w/ developing world people entirely to bypass US labor laws so…

OT third hand, corporations have already done their best to outsource everything that’s outsource-able to the point of diminishing returns so… would it be anything worse? )

Lame AF

By sizzlinkitty • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

I recently bought the game and played a little. My last battlefield was over a decade ago, battlefield1 and 2042 sucked in my honest opinion, I can’t support all of the WW1 and WW2 remakes, and the premise of 2042 jumped the shark long before the game was released. That said, I have about 20 hours into BF6 and the level of shilling for battle pass and to sell skins makes me sick. What ever happened to paying $80 dollars for a game being enough to provide the consumer with all the things and not try to nickel and dime them. This is not normal and we shouldn’t accept it…

Live Nation Avoids Ticketmaster Breakup By ‘Open Sourcing’ Their Ticketing Model

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Live Nation reached a settlement with the U.S. Department of Justice that avoids breaking up its dominant live events empire with Ticketmaster. Instead, the deal requires changes like “open sourcing” their ticketing model and divesting some venues. NBC News reports:
The company and the Justice Department reached a settlement on Monday, following a week of testimony during an antitrust trial that threatened to potentially separate the world’s largest live entertainment company. […] On a background call with reporters Monday, a senior justice official said the deal will drive down prices by giving both artists and consumers more choice.

As part of the agreement, Ticketmaster will provide a standalone ticketing system that will allow third-party companies like SeatGeek and StubHub to offer primary tickets through the platform. The senior justice official described it as “open sourcing” their ticketing model. The company will also divest up to 13 amphitheaters and reserve 50% of tickets for nonexclusive venues. Ticketmaster is also prohibited from retaliating against a venue that selects another primary ticket distributor, among other requirements. Although a group of states have joined the DOJ in signing the agreement, other states can continue to press their own claims.

“Open Source”

By HotNeedleOfInquiry • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
You keep using that word. I don’t think it means what you think it means.

Re:Wow

By bill_mcgonigle • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Not really.

Gail Slater was the Antitrust Director at DoJ and she got shitcanned a few weeks ago because she was actually going to anti-trust Ticketmaster. The Lobbyists got that “problem solved”.

Yes, it’s as corrupt as you can imagine.

(reportedly/allegedly/etc)

settlement with air quotes

By SirSlud • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Neither side apparently said anything about the agreement in court on Friday, which Judge Arun Subramanian said today was âoeabsolutely unacceptable.â âoeIt shows absolute disrespect for the court, the jury and this entire process,â he said.

With this admin, nobody should be surprised. Corruption is standard operating procedure.

This is why people sued Ticketmaster

By Zontar_Thing_From_Ve • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Two years ago, somebody I went to high school with posted on Facebook trying desperately to sell some concert tickets the day before a show. Her husband got sick and they tried to dump the tickets. To the best of my knowledge, they didn’t sell the tickets because she was trying to get full value. I made a screenshot of her post showing the cost of the tickets. I’m not going to name the band because if I did, people would post “I didn’t know they were still around” or “I can’t believe they paid that much to see them”. Here are the details.

Venue seats 10,000 to 12,000. Located in a town with over 100,000 residents, so not a major metro area.
Seats located roughly 20 rows from the stage.
Cost of 2 tickets:
Tickets: $398.00. (2 x $199.00)
Service Fee: $117.42. ($58.71 per ticket - that’s 29.5% of the cost of the tickets with no explanation as to what it’s for)
Delivery Fee: $9.95 (These are mobile tickets so that’s a fee for sending it via email/text)
Taxes: $42.03
Total: $567.40. or $283.70 per ticket.
I will give you a hint - The group’s last top 40 US single was in 1977.

Weak Sauce

By edi_guy • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

The situation is still super broken. Labelling any part of this Open Source means the “senior justice official” is either ignorant or intentionally misleading. Just plain wrong.

Look, there is overwhelming demand for many of these events. The question is do we (as a society of consumers) want to allow shows to become financial trading instruments like so many other things in our lives, or put into place mechanisms to remove the incentive associated with scalping and secondary ticket markets. IMHO this could be done with cooperation of artists and then ticketing mechanisms. But of course Ticketmaster, et al are more than happy to keep the up-bidding going so that they can get their XX% of whatever the overbid price becomes. Tay-Tay isn’t getting any of that overbid money so artists like her should be onboard.

How AI Assistants Are Moving the Security Goalposts

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from KrebsOnSecurity:
AI-based assistants or “agents” — autonomous programs that have access to the user’s computer, files, online services and can automate virtually any task — are growing in popularity with developers and IT workers. But as so many eyebrow-raising headlines over the past few weeks have shown, these powerful and assertive new tools are rapidly shifting the security priorities for organizations, while blurring the lines between data and code, trusted co-worker and insider threat, ninja hacker and novice code jockey.

The new hotness in AI-based assistants — OpenClaw (formerly known as ClawdBot and Moltbot) — has seen rapid adoption since its release in November 2025. OpenClaw is an open-source autonomous AI agent designed to run locally on your computer and proactively take actions on your behalf without needing to be prompted. If that sounds like a risky proposition or a dare, consider that OpenClaw is most useful when it has complete access to your entire digital life, where it can then manage your inbox and calendar, execute programs and tools, browse the Internet for information, and integrate with chat apps like Discord, Signal, Teams or WhatsApp.

Other more established AI assistants like Anthropic’s Claude and Microsoft’s Copilot also can do these things, but OpenClaw isn’t just a passive digital butler waiting for commands. Rather, it’s designed to take the initiative on your behalf based on what it knows about your life and its understanding of what you want done. “The testimonials are remarkable,” the AI security firm Snyk observed. “Developers building websites from their phones while putting babies to sleep; users running entire companies through a lobster-themed AI; engineers who’ve set up autonomous code loops that fix tests, capture errors through webhooks, and open pull requests, all while they’re away from their desks.” You can probably already see how this experimental technology could go sideways in a hurry. […]
Last month, Meta AI safety director Summer Yue said OpenClaw unexpectedly started mass-deleting messages in her email inbox, despite instructions to confirm those actions first. She wrote: “Nothing humbles you like telling your OpenClaw ‘confirm before acting’ and watching it speedrun deleting your inbox. I couldn’t stop it from my phone. I had to RUN to my Mac mini like I was defusing a bomb.”

Krebs also noted the many misconfigured OpenClaw installations users had set up, leaving their administrative dashboards publicly accessible online. According to pentester Jamieson O’Reilly, “a cursory search revealed hundreds of such servers exposed online.” When those exposed interfaces are accessed, attackers can retrieve the agent’s configuration and sensitive credentials. O’Reilly warned attackers could access “every credential the agent uses — from API keys and bot tokens to OAuth secrets and signing keys.”

“You can pull the full conversation history across every integrated platform, meaning months of private messages and file attachments, everything the agent has seen,” O’Reilly added. And because you control the agent’s perception layer, you can manipulate what the human sees. Filter out certain messages. Modify responses before they’re displayed.”

Clueless people doing clueless things

By gweihir • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

With technology they do not understand. Is this a security risk? Yes, massively so. Can it be fixed? To the best of our knowledge only by not running these agents except inside heavily isolated sand-boxes. Which kind of defeats their purposes. But LLMs cannot ever be really reliable ans that is what is needed for any security-critical mechanism. Too many people are just bright-eyed naive and expect things from their shiny new fetish that it cannot deliver.

In other words, bad idea is bad idea.

Re:Clueless people doing clueless things

By nightflameauto • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

With technology they do not understand. Is this a security risk? Yes, massively so. Can it be fixed? To the best of our knowledge only by not running these agents except inside heavily isolated sand-boxes. Which kind of defeats their purposes. But LLMs cannot ever be really reliable ans that is what is needed for any security-critical mechanism. Too many people are just bright-eyed naive and expect things from their shiny new fetish that it cannot deliver.

In other words, bad idea is bad idea.

This is the biggest problem with the current AI prophets’ promises. People in this day and age are stupid enough to believe the peddlers of the new snake oil outright, rather than viewing this new thing as an avenue of research that must be tested before being given the keys to “do the things.” For some reason, people just believe when it’s new tech, without proof. And beyond that, with all kinds of proof that the things being promised aren’t just not yet real, they may very well be impossible to achieve with the methods currently being used.

From the start there have been those of us saying that the fear we have of current gen AI is not so much the AI itself. It’s that humans are going to put these non-thinking machines in charge of important decisions which will lead to terrible outcomes. And even as we see some of those terrible outcomes becoming real, people are still believing in the infallibility of these machines.

The only possible bright side in all of this is that at some point they will fuck up so horribly that people will have no choice but to realize machines are not akin to god. Let’s just hope that the fuck up that finally wakes people up isn’t the one that also ends humanity. Unfortunately, we just may be dumb enough to give them that capability before we snap out of it.

Re:Clueless people doing clueless things

By gweihir • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Yes, indeed.

But the other problem is that while in telephone networks, you can use out-of-band signaling, and, after decades of attacks and problems, this is now the standard. For LLMs, that is not possible. There is only one channel and everything goes into it. Maybe there will eventually be other AI types that can separate data and control reliable, while using similar knowledge-bases to LLMs. But LLMs will not be it. The very principle they operate on is that everything is seen as language. Without that, the idea stops working.

Got to be a honey trap.

By BeaverCleaver • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

This whole concept is so crazy. Even “non-techy” people know about identity theft, not sharing passwords etc. The news has been full of amusing “AI” fuckups since the models became public. Most of those stories are riffs on the 1980s “computer fucked up” news stories from the 1980s. Even Joe Sixpack knows that computers can’t be trusted.

So why the hell is anyone letting an LLM near anything useful or important? How are vendors marketing these “assistant” tools? At this point I can only conclude that it’s a deliberate plot by OpenClaw et al to mine users’ data so they have something else of value before the “AI” bubble pops. Either that, or OpenClaw et al are just a front for some three-letter agency, just like those “Anom” phones from a few years ago. Or Crypto AG from years before that.

AI: The Billionare Created Invasive Nightmare

By BrendaEM • Score: 3 Thread
There’s no way to sugarcoat it: AI’s massive data theft must be controlled. AI is the 2nd most harmful invention humanity has ever made.

Bluesky CEO Jay Graber Is Stepping Down

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Bluesky CEO Jay Graber is stepping down after overseeing the platform’s growth from a Twitter research project into a 40-million-user alternative to X. “As Bluesky matures, the company needs a seasoned operator focused on scaling and execution, while I return to what I do best: building new things,” Graber wrote in a statement.

She will be transitioning to a new Chief Innovation Officer role while Venture capitalist Toni Schneider will serve as interim CEO until the board searches for a permanent replacement. Wired reports:
Graber joined Bluesky in 2019, when it was a research project within Twitter focused on developing a decentralized framework for the social web. She became the company’s first chief executive officer in 2021, when it spun out into an independent entity. She oversaw the platform’s remarkable rise and the growing pains it experienced as it transformed from a quirky Twitter offshoot to a full-fledged alternative to X. Schneider tells WIRED that he intends to help Bluesky “become not just the best open social app, but the foundation for a whole new generation of user-owned networks.”

Schneider, who will continue working as a partner at the venture capital firm True Ventures while at Bluesky, was previously CEO of the Wordpress parent company, Automattic, from 2006 to 2014. He also served as its CEO again in 2024 while top executive Matt Mullenweg went on a sabbatical. During that time, Schneider met Graber and became an adviser to Bluesky’s leadership. In a blog post announcing his new role, Schneider said he plans to emphasize scaling, describing his job as “to help set up Bluesky’s next phase of growth.”

This isn’t the end for Graber and Bluesky. She will transition to become the company’s chief innovation officer, a role focused on Bluesky’s technology stack rather than its business operations. The position was created for her. Graber, who began her career as a software engineer, has always sounded the most enthusiastic when discussing Bluesky’s technology rather than its revenue streams. Bluesky’s board of directors will appoint the next permanent CEO. The members include Jabber founder Jeremie Miller, crypto-focused VC Kinjal Shah, TechDirt founder Mike Masnick, and Graber. (Twitter founder Jack Dorsey was originally part of the board but quit in 2024.) This means Graber will have input on her successor. The talent search is still in early stages.

Then put your money where your mouth is

By karmawarrior • Score: 3, Informative Thread

> Schneider tells WIRED that he intends to help Bluesky “become not just the best open social app, but the foundation for a whole new generation of user-owned networks.”

Bluesky will remain a normal monolithic network as long as its owned and controlled by one group. If they want to prove they intend to do what they’re claiming they want to do, they need to decentralize, and split the company into multiple (at least 3) social network portals with their own critical infrastructure.

For now, there’s only one decentralized network, and it’s not BS.

Re:No need to worry

By AmiMoJo • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

I like Bluesky. I don’t need to live on the edge all the time, I don’t need to near what Twitter Nazis have to say. If that’s a bubble then I’m okay with it, it’s got cats and some politics and it’s not my only source of information.

Maybe it’s too good for the capitalist world we live in and won’t survive, but if it dies I won’t be going back to Twitter.

Someone should make a Bluesky for Reddit. Reddit without the gaslighting and moderation abuse.

Re:No need to worry

By apparently • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
If you’re constantly getting Blocked on Bluesky, that’s a YOU problem, princess. You can whine all you want about it, but nothing changes the fact that no one is obligated to engage with you.

Re: No need to worry

By kellin • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Most recent data I could find shows:

Truth Social 6 million active
Gettr 9 million (total, maybe half are active)
Bluesky 40 million with about 3.5 million active.

Re: No need to worry

By ArmoredDragon • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

I don’t believe it’s about who they ban so much as who creates an account there to begin with, and even then, actively participates, and even still, what they actually talk about.

Of the major social media platforms, I tend to abserve the following:
- Twitter: anything and everything, even though the vast majority of it is completely useless
- YouTube: anything and everything, even if most of it is demonetized
- Reddit: anything and everything, if it weren’t for the fact that the vast majority of it is automatically blocked and/or shadowbanned by AIs of infinite wisdom
- TikTok: Endless scroll of content that isn’t given the time of day to be meaningful, but also an endless dopamine hit for stupid people. Effectively a poor man’s heroine
- Fecebook: Endless scroll of cat memes and people reacting to stupid shit their neighbor did last night
- Bluesky: Endless scroll of outrage and doom about something in the current news cycle, especially if some other unknown person must surely find it offensive because of their identity

Only three of these occasionally have something worthwhile. The rest do not.

Regardless, while I understand that you desire to ad-hominem everybody you don’t like by labeling them a nazi, and require that all nazis be banned, all this does is firmly ensnare you into an echo chamber. While echo chambers might make you feel good, they aren’t intellectually stimulating.

Bluesky may as well just be “TikTok for assholes” because being in the right echo chamber yields dopamine. Sure, other sites have their share of assholes, big ones at that, but in their defense, at least they have other stuff too.

Qualcomm’s New Arduino Ventuno Q Is an AI-Focused Computer Designed For Robotics

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot
Qualcomm and Arduino have unveiled the Arduino Ventuno Q, a new AI-focused single-board computer built for robotics and edge systems. Engadget reports:
Called the Arduino Ventuno Q, it uses Qualcomm’s Dragonwing IQ8 processor along with a dedicated STM32H5 low-latency microcontroller (MCU). “Ventuno Q is engineered specifically for systems that move, manipulate and respond to the physical world with precision and reliability,” the company wrote on the product page. The Ventuno Q is more sophisticated (and expensive) than Arduinio’s usual AIO boards, thanks to the Dragonwing IQ8 processor that includes an 8-core ARM Cortex CPU, Adreno Arm Cortex A623 GPU and Hexagon Tensor NPU that can hit up ot 40 TOPs. It also comes with 16GB of LPDDR5 RAM, along with 64GB of eMMC storage and an M.2 NVME Gen.4 slot to expand that. Other features include Wi-Fi 6, Bluetooth 5.3, 2.5Gbps ethernet and USB camera support.

The Ventuno Q includes Arudino App Lab, with pre-trained AI models including LLMs, VLMs, ASR, gesture recognition, pose estimation and object tracking, all running offline. It’s designed for AI systems that run entirely offline like smart kiosks, healthcare assistants and traffic flow analysis, along with Edge AI vision and sensing systems. It also supports a full robotics stack including vision processing combined with deterministic motor control for precise vision and manipulation. It’s also ideal for education and research in areas like computer vision, generative AI and prototyping at the edge, according to Arduino.
Further reading: Up Next for Arduino After Qualcomm Acquisition: High-Performance Computing

Don’t

By hwstar • Score: 3 Thread

Qualcomm is known for their contracts written on flypaper. They have a whole department which does lawyerly things (QTL).

Stay Away

Meh

By Pf0tzenpfritz • Score: 3 Thread

> It’s designed for AI systems that run entirely offline like smart kiosks, healthcare assistants and traffic flow analysis, along with Edge AI vision and sensing systems.

Yes. Typical Arduino use cases, obviously.

Pricing

By yo303 • Score: 3 Thread

Pricing was conveniently left out of the summary. It should be less than $300 in 2Q26.