Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Early Research Suggests a Path to Predict and Prevent Lung Cancer
  2. Criticisms Rise Before Vote on America’s Cryptocurrency ‘Clarity Act’
  3. 2027’s ‘Tomb Raider’ Remake: Unreal Engine 5 and AI-Assisted Assets ‘Refined’ By Humans
  4. Utah Residents Sue Officials Over Kevin O’Leary Data Center Plan
  5. Scientists Find Wind Blowing From Our Milky Way’s Black Hole
  6. Small Modular Nuclear Reactor Reaches Criticality In First Test
  7. The US Military Quietly Turned GPS Into a Global ‘Numbers Station,’ Evidence Suggests
  8. Google Will Pay SpaceX $920 Million Per Month For Compute
  9. Bitcoin Falls To $60,000 As Zcash Bug Rocks Crypto
  10. 340 Local News Outlets Now Blocking the Internet Archive
  11. GOV.UK Goes Dutch On Payments As It Dumps Stripe
  12. BSA Lashes Out At Mandatory Open-Source Licensing
  13. Google Says It Will Replenish More Water Than It Uses At Data Centers
  14. Valve Says Steam Machine ‘Shipping This Summer’
  15. ISS Astronauts Told To Prepare For Possible Evacuation Over Air Leak

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Early Research Suggests a Path to Predict and Prevent Lung Cancer

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Scientists “have made a discovery that may help prevent some people from developing lung cancer,” reports the New York Times, noting that lung cancer “kills more people worldwide than any other cancer.”
A team of more than 80 researchers working across four continents have identified a set of proteins in the blood that accurately predict lung cancers more than five years before diagnosis. The scientists also found early evidence that an existing anti-inflammatory drug could significantly reduce lung cancer risk in people with elevated concentrations of these proteins, which they linked to inflammation. More research is needed before a test based on these proteins could be ready for use in patients. And scientists would still need to run a randomized trial to determine whether the drug prevents lung cancers. Still, outside experts said the findings, which were published on Thursday in the journal Cell, offer a promising starting point toward a long-held public health goal…

Led by Dr. Swanton, Dr. Tej Pandya, a Ph.D. student, and other researchers took a set of 48,000 blood samples from the UK Biobank and used machine learning to identify 14 proteins associated with the development of lung cancer. When the researchers looked at the presence of those proteins and also took into account a patient’s age, smoking status and history of lung disease, they were able to predict who would develop lung cancer more accurately than the best risk assessment models currently in use…

Using mouse and cell models, the scientists showed that these proteins increased when a specific inflammatory pathway was activated. Smoking and air pollution can activate that pathway. This adds to the evidence that it isn’t just genetic mutations caused by smoking, pollution or other factors that are driving lung cancers. Rather, Dr. Swanton said, the findings suggest that “smoke causes mutations and inflammation, which together cause cancer.” They also found that the signature was increased in people who later developed chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and pulmonary fibrosis, pointing to a common inflammatory environment upstream of all three diseases.

Criticisms Rise Before Vote on America’s Cryptocurrency ‘Clarity Act’

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
An upcoming vote in a few weeks on America’s cryptocurrency “Clarity Act” is “rattling Wall Street and consumer advocates,” reports CNN, with its proposal to regulate the bulk of crypto markets through America’s Commodity Futures Trading Commission. “It allows crypto companies to operate, at long last, in compliance with U.S. rules, rather than what they have been doing — essentially running their businesses within a patchwork of state and federal legal gray areas.”
Even for Jamie Dimon, the banking titan who’s not known to mince words, it was a surprising shot across the bow when he described a fellow financier as “full of sh*t.” “No one’s gonna bow down to this guy or that company,” Dimon told Fox Business last week. “This guy” being Brian Armstrong, and “that company” being cryptocurrency exchange Coinbase. The Dimon-Armstrong tension isn’t new, but it is boiling over publicly as the Senate inches closer to a floor vote on the crypto industry’s No. 1 legislative priority, known as the Clarity Act. Dimon, a longtime crypto skeptic, broadly supports crypto regulation but takes issue with a provision in the Clarity Act that would allow companies like Coinbase to “effectively pay interest on deposits… without the protection they should have.”

The spicy comment about Armstrong came after Dimon rattled off other concerns about the Clarity Act, including what he sees as its insufficient anti-money-laundering and know-your-customer safeguards that banks have had in place for decades… “If (Armstrong) takes deposits like a bank, he should have bank rules,” Dimon said in the Fox Business interview… The immediate concern from banks (and many consumer advocates) is that crypto exchanges like Coinbase would, in the grand tradition of Silicon Valley innovation, lure customers in with huge rewards and then phase those benefits out over time. Deposits in a crypto exchange are also not insured by the federal government the way bank deposits are, but that’s the kind of fine print that customers tend to overlook until it’s too late. JPMorgan Chase spokesperson Trish Wexler underscored that the bank wants the bill to pass, with some “fixes,” like prohibiting rewards on stablecoin holdings and strengthening anti-money-laundering guardrails.
Coinbase’s CEO responded in an interview with Politico:
Armstrong pointed to restrictions on rewards paid to idle cryptocurrency balances and disclosures on stablecoins as part of a handful of policies included in the bill to appease the banking industry’s requests. “I think it’d be good for the banks,” Armstrong said of the bill. “It would be great for crypto companies as well … Hopefully we can get past the absolutisms and just see if we can get this bill over the finish line.”
But CNN notes concerns about weaving cryptocurrency — “a historically self-contained financial system prone to stomach-churning booms and busts” — more deeply into America’s traditional finance infrastructure:
“It’s not just a crypto story, it’s a broad deregulation of our securities markets story,” Hilary Allen, a law professor at American University who specializes in banking and cryptocurrency, said in an interview. And that should concern everyone, Allen says, even if they have no investments at all, because “if we get a financial crisis in this space… no one comes out of that unscathed.”

Legitimizing the grift.

By Gravis Zero • Score: 3 Thread

Cryptocurrency is a waste of energy and drain on the economy. Nothing of value is produced because it’s all a grift.

NO FAKE CURRENCY

By DewDude • Score: 3 Thread

Pretty soon you won’t know how worthless which currency you have is. You’ll just know you won’t be able to afford shit at some point.

Crypto is a grift. Plain any simple. Anyone who says otherwise is no better than someone who defends a thief.

We have fake currency already.....ever since we went off the gold standard. IF you want to destroy consumer confidence and destroy buying power, unregulated bullshit is it.

He’s missing the point

By battingly • Score: 3 Thread

The sole purpose of this bill is to increase the value of our dear leader’s investments in crypto.

2027’s ‘Tomb Raider’ Remake: Unreal Engine 5 and AI-Assisted Assets ‘Refined’ By Humans

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
An official trailer dropped this week for Tomb Raider: Legacy of Atlantis. It’s “a full-blown remake of the original 1996 Tomb Raider game,” reports Kotaku, “rebuilt from the ground up using Unreal Engine 5.” Developed by Flying Wild Hog (with assistance/guidance from longtime Tomb Raider studio Crystal Dynamics), “it will also make some changes to puzzles, combat, platforming…”

The game’s Steam page acknowledges that AI-assisted tools were used during development “to support some early exploration and temporary development content,” but that any AI-assisted assets were “either replaced or refined by humans in order to maintain the creative and artistic vision of the development team.” In a statement to Eurogamer, Crystal Dynamics clarifies that they “leverage” AI tools “to help our teams iterate on ideas faster and more efficiently, while ensuring that all finished content in the final product is human-crafted.” (But are they considering AI-assisted assets “refined” by humans as “human-crafted”?)

Polygon reports that “The early response to the news has been mixed to negative on the Tomb Raider subreddit, ranging from vague hopes that the generative-AI craze will simply go away to grim resignation that this is the future of game development.”
Beyond labor concerns, art theft worries, and environmental issues, the most straightforward reason AI art has been unpopular is that many players find it hideous. We’ll find out for sure whether Tomb Raider: Legacy of Atlantis’ use of AI is particularly blatant when it comes out in February 2027.
Its release date is February 12, 2027 on PS5, Xbox Series X/S, Switch 2, and PC.

As long it looks good

By Z80a • Score: 3 Thread

90% of the “AI art” problem is just that people doing it don’t have a good eye for art and end up doing soulless deformed stuffs.
Stuff like shopping mall advertising using characters with the wrong number of fingers and all that.
If you’re not even counting the fingers, you’re probably just picking the first thing that pops out and plastering it directly.

Utah Residents Sue Officials Over Kevin O’Leary Data Center Plan

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Utah residents and a progressive nonprofit are suing officials over Kevin O’Leary’s planned Stratos Project AI data center, arguing that the special authority overseeing it gives unelected officials too much control over land use, taxation, public health, and local governance. The lawsuit comes as O’Leary has agreed to shrink the proposed 40,000-acre project by 75% amid mounting political and community pushback. NBC News reports:
The lawsuit was filed Wednesday in Utah’s 3rd District Court by the Alliance for a Better Utah and the group of anonymous residents. The plaintiffs hope to challenge the constitutionality of the Military Installation Development Authority (MIDA) — a special entity that oversees the data center’s proposal — and its approval of the project, a spokesperson for the nonprofit said. Attorney David Irvine, who is representing the plaintiffs, alleges that MIDA is exercising powers as an unelected body that “the Utah Constitution never authorized.” “Under the Stratos plan, it would hold permanent, irrevocable control over public health, safety, taxation, and land use across tens of thousands of acres of Box Elder County, with no voter recourse,” he said in a statement.

The lawsuit alleges that allowing MIDA to oversee the data center’s development “irrevocably” cuts off Box Elder County citizens’ rights by not allowing sufficient public input in the project. “The Stratos Project Area Plan, and actions taken by MIDA and the Commission to enact the same, puts lawmaking power respecting questions of public health, safety, welfare, morals, taxation, zoning, land use, and the like, in relation to a significant swath of county territory in a non-elected MIDA Board,” the complaint reads.

In addition to MIDA and the Box Elder County Commission, the lawsuit names Utah Senate President J. Stuart Adams and state Sen. Jerry Stevenson, who also serve as MIDA board members. Irvine said Adams and Stevenson’s presence on the MIDA board as active legislators “appears to violate the prohibition on holding more than one office of public trust simultaneously,” and claimed this should render the data center’s approval “null and void.”

It was only a matter of time.

By Pezbian • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

This is going on in my home county with all the official stuff going on in my hometown. My position on it is the same. The design is pretty great, but the odds of the finished product matching the design aren’t. I still have zero faith in Kevin. There’s nothing short-term that will change that. Trust has to be earned.

Not too unlike the “inland Port Commission&r

By Smonster • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
This disenfranchisement is very similar to the IPC that in effect annexed a huge swath of SLC at the express opposition on the city residents to spend tax dollars generated by SLC to build infrastructure while exempting said infrastructure from the tax rolls.

Utah government is the worst. And a glaring example of corruption through single party rule because they successfully convinced a small majority the opposition is evil. And as such they don’t deserve a seat a the table.

That saddest part is that it is completely within the power of Utahan to change their government. But they have beeen so successfully brainwashed, they just can’t bring themselves to do it.

I have lived in supermajority red state, a super majority blue state, and now live in purple state. It may take longer to get somethings done here, but the resulting laws and legislations is almost always better when policy is debated out in the open instead of negotiated in back rooms and presented as done deal for an up or down vote. The corruption is far less palpable.

Corporate “good” is not local public good.

By couchslug • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Data centers squander increasingly valuable common resources and do not need to be located where they burden local communities or aquifers.

AI data centers are not a public good. NIMBY in this is legitimate.
Sacrificing resources to serve corporate masters is silly while general opposition is logical and wise.

Epstein class investors can put data centers distant from anything that matters. When the hardware then later the structures go obsolete that distance keeps them where they can (as many will be) left basically abandoned with nil community impact.

Reasons do not exist for the public to support the rich getting richer off community water supplies. Reasons do not exist to trust the Epstein class to be good stewards.

Democracy includes the right to oppose social parasites for any legal reason. There are no personal negative consequences for opposing AI data centers as fraud, waste and abuse they are. Just say no.

There are plenty of places to put them where they aren’t serious public burdens. The US isn’t short of unoccupied land (see night time satellite images if in doubt).

MIDA

By Gravis Zero • Score: 3 Thread

I was curious about MIDA and WTF “Stratos” was and they have a website that list their stated goals (numbers added for reference): https://www.midaut.org/stratos

1 Strengthen military readiness and national security by supporting energy resilience, compute power, and data storage for defense operations.
2 Advance major energy and technology investment in Northern Utah through the development of a large-scale data and energy campus.
3 Position Utah as a leader in next-generation infrastructure for artificial intelligence, cloud computing, secure data systems, and mission-critical national defense operations.
4 Support reliable, independent energy generation by including dedicated on-site power generation designed to meet the campus’s needs without placing additional demand on the existing electrical grid.
5 Generate long-term economic opportunity for Box Elder County through construction jobs, permanent careers, local hiring, and significant annual revenues.
6 Fund public infrastructure and municipal services without creating a burden on County taxpayers.
7 Support Hill Air Force Base and the Utah National Guard by generating revenues that can help fund critical infrastructure projects tied to military readiness.

Goal #3 is in conflict with #4, #5, #6, and #7.
* A data center consumes an obscene amount of power. Goal #4 is failed.
* A data center will not generate long-term economic opportunity. Goal #5 is failed.
* A data center will drive up energy prices. Goal #6 is failed.
* A data center will not generate much revenue. Goal #7 is failed.

About 79% of these residence voted Republican in the last two elections, so I’m not really surprised that they have been grifted under the guise of patriotism.

Scientists Find Wind Blowing From Our Milky Way’s Black Hole

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
After 50 years of searching, astronomers say they have finally found evidence of a long-sought “wind” blowing from Sagittarius A*, the supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way. “Unless a black hole exists in a perfect vacuum, it must blow a wind somehow. And there is no perfect vacuum in the universe,” team co-leader and Northwestern University researcher Mark Gorski said in a statement. “With new observations, this is the first time we’ve had a clean enough view to see the wind’s imprint. We looked at the data and said, ‘There it is. There is the thing that everybody’s been looking for for 50 years.’" Space.com reports:
Scientists have been aware for some time that feeding black holes launch powerful outflows of material around them, including jets and winds. Winds are caused when matter falling to the black hole is accelerated to near light-speed, generating pressure that pushes infalling material away. That has been seen with ravenously feeding black holes before, but not the barely feeding Sgr A*. Its sparse consumption of material and the fact it is obscured by the plane of the Milky Way from our vantage point have made tracing this wind difficult.

Gorski’s Northwestern colleague and team co-leader Lena Murchikova pointed out that the scientists were the first to detect molecular gas very close to Sgr A* feeding the supermassive black hole. That makes Sgr A* reassuringly like other supermassive black holes. “The wind is not powerful, and its direction probably wanders with time. It shows that our black hole is not unique, and our place in the universe is not unique,” Murchikova added. “To observe our own black hole, we have to look through the plane of our galaxy. That means we have to peer through gas, dust and ionized structures, and you can’t really see through all of that easily.”

While the team’s results confirm that Sgr A* is extremely quiet compared to the supermassive black holes that sit in bright, turbulent regions of other galaxies called active galactic nuclei (AGN), this black hole wind is no slouch. In fact, the scientists think that it has been raging for around 20,000 years. “The majority of other galaxies spend most of their lives in a state where they are not particularly active,” Murchikova said. “But we can only see them when they are in a fireworks stage. It is very attractive to study black holes when they are in the fireworks stage, but that’s not actually their dominant state. “Sgr A* finally gives us a window into the life of a black hole in this quiet state.”
The team’s research was published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters.

Small Modular Nuclear Reactor Reaches Criticality In First Test

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica:
Just over a year ago, the Trump Administration issued an executive order meant to accelerate the development of nuclear power in the US. While an entire startup ecosystem has developed around the use of different — and typically smaller — reactor designs, only one of them has been fully licensed so far, and there are no plans to actually build any instances of that design.

The executive order directed the Department of Energy to have three different reactor designs reach criticality in a bit over a year. On Thursday, a startup called Antares announced that a test reactor it had placed at the Idaho National Laboratory had reached criticality, making it the first new design to cross this threshold. Criticality means that the nuclear reactions inside the hardware had become self sustaining; it does not mean the reactor had started to generate power. […]

At the moment, Antares is just testing what it calls a Mark 0 reactor, which is not connected to the power-generation portion. Instead, it’s being used to validate the company’s modeling of the physical conditions in its reactors and generate safety data that can be used during licensing applications. Attempts to run the entire system, including electrical generation, are expected to happen next year. While the work was done at a Department of Energy Lab, the company is working with the Department of Defense’s Project Pele program for developing a mobile nuclear reactor. The company has also received support from NASA.

Out of control demand for power

By rsilvergun • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
A lax regulatory environment and a technology that is outclassed by wind and solar in virtually every single metric except space usage in a country with nothing but space?

Hey what could possibly go wrong?

Really looking forward to having nuclear powered data centers dropped in the middle of my community by finance Bros pretending to be tech Bros…

Meanwhile real SMRs are being built

By Kernel Kurtz • Score: 5, Informative Thread
Here in Canada OPG continues to move along on time and on time and on budget.

Site construction progress - Spring 2026

Excavation and blasting of all three major on-site shafts – tunnel boring machine launch shaft, reactor building shaft, and forebay shaft – is now complete. In April, the 2.1 million pound diaphragm plate steel composite basemat – the foundation of the Unit 1 reactor building – was successfully placed 35 metres down into the reactor shaft, allowing for construction on the reactor building to begin moving upwards. A dedicated crane foundation pad is being prepared beside the reactor shaft to support a tower crane which will be used for component installation and material handling activities at the reactor building. At the turbine building, pile installation is nearing completion, while construction of the Administration and Control Buildings remains on track. Construction of the Holt Switching Station continues to progress. This station will transmit electricity generated by Unit 1 to Ontario’s electricity grid until the planned SMR units are connected to the Bowmanville Switching Station. The tunnel boring machine – nicknamed Harriet Brooks - is being assembled ahead of tunneling commencement in support of the Condenser Cooling Water system later this summer.


https://www.opg.com/projects-s…

I’ll continue to post updates for the haters as construction continues.

Whew.

By dgatwood • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

For a moment, I read that as “supercriticality” and was more than a bit concerned. :-D

But seriously, that’s great — both that it successfully reached that point and that it did so on the first try.

Re:Oh look the grifters are back

By 0123456 • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Power grids are for high-trust societies. They can’t exist for long in a world where you can’t rely on some idiot (or some idiotic AI) thousands of miles away to not do something that takes down the entire grid. The lower trust becomes, the smaller a system we can support.

Localized power is going to be an ever-growing industry over the next few years. We already have multiple companies selling large batteries to power essential home systems during power outages and we’re certainly going to see an increase in local power generation to replace grids.

Re:A fabulous plan with no possible downsides

By swillden • Score: 4, Informative Thread

This sounds like a fabulous plan with no possible downsides, risks, or sharp edges.

The risks are a lot smaller than you think they are, because of new reactor design. Nearly all of the nuclear reactors in the world are still using a design that’s 70 years old, that requires active cooling and doesn’t fail safely. We have much better designs now, at least on paper, designs that simply can’t melt down, whose failure mode is to simply stop. But no one builds these new designs on industrial scale because they’re unproven, and there hasn’t been much funding for doing all of the engineering and research needed to develop them into fully-functioning designs that can be.

I’m skeptical that small reactors are really the best way to actually deploy nuclear power on a large scale, because of security concerns, but starting small is the best way to validate and refine new designs. And modularity is clearly a good strategy for making deployments of varying sizes cost-effective. If you can develop a cost-effective module that can be manufactured in large numbers, you can build large plants by clustering them.

The new designs shouldn’t actually need much operational oversight — if something goes operationally wrong, they just stop functioning — but they’ll still have highly radioactive cores which, if extracted, could be pretty terrible weapons. Not to make nuclear bombs, but to greatly enhance the damage done by conventional explosives, by adding radiation hazards that linger for years. So, security will remain an important consideration, and the SMRs should only be deployed where security can be assured, which will in practice mean that most are deployed in large clusters.

This all assumes that the safety, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the new designs proves out, of course. The only way to find out whether that will be the case is to try.

The US Military Quietly Turned GPS Into a Global ‘Numbers Station,’ Evidence Suggests

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
A security researcher says evidence suggests the U.S. military has been using an obscure GPS message field for nearly 20 years to broadcast encrypted key-distribution data, effectively turning GPS satellites into a global “numbers station.” The hidden-looking 176-bit messages appear tied to the Pentagon’s Over-the-Air Distribution system for remotely updating cryptographic keys, meaning ordinary GPS receivers may have been receiving the traffic all along without anyone outside the military noticing. The findings have been detailed by Steven Murdoch, an information security expert, in a new article in Inside GNSS. 404 Media reports:
[…] From the beginning, he suspected that the subframe field contained encrypted transmissions because the data was so random. “Random data is actually very unusual to get in nature,” Murdoch said. “If you see it, either it’s been carefully designed to be random — but then, why is someone sending out random data? — or it’s encrypted data. I thought encrypted data is by far the most likely explanation.” He returned to the subframe on and off over the years, and solicited guesses about its content on Stack Exchange in 2023. Ahmed Kamruddin, a master’s student at UCL, developed the project further in 2025. Then, this year, Murdoch put the last pieces of the puzzle together over several weeks by analyzing open archive Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) recordings collected since 2007 and kept by GFZ Helmholtz Centre for Geosciences.

This dataset included more than 12 million observations of Subframe 4, Page 17, yielding 3,994 unique 176-bit messages. Within this corpus, Murdoch pinpointed key-repeating “sentinels” including a pattern that appeared in February 2010 and was broadcast on and off across dozens of satellites for more than a decade. Murdoch discovered that this particular sentinel was transmitted by all 31 operational satellites within a window of a few hours on May 26, 2011, potentially heralding the activation of a new operational system. He confirmed that this timeline coincided with the rollout of the military’s Over-the-Air Distribution (OTAD) and the Over-the-Air Rekeying (OTAR) by cross-referencing declassified documents, including a 2015 presentation about the dates of the operation.

“There was a perfect match between the timeline and that presentation and the change points that were automatically identified from the data,” Murdoch said. “That was the smoking gun that made me think: This is what it’s for.” These automated systems replaced the cumbersome manual distribution of cryptographic keying material, allowing military GPS receivers around the world to be rekeyed remotely through satellite broadcasts rather than through onsite procedures. For the next 11 years, this expansive rekeying operation was overlooked in public GPS data. In 2022, the system entered a new phase, according to Murdoch’s analysis. The shift was characterized by a slowing in the message rotation rate. Later, in December 2023, broadcasts carrying a distinctive “TEXT” prefix emerged then gradually spread across the constellation.

Murdoch isn’t sure what explains the recent transition, though it could be a possible modernization of the infrastructure or the introduction of a new protocol. But to him, the bigger takeaway is that the signals were always available for anyone willing to take a closer look, a discovery that suggests that there could be more revelations hidden for the cryptographically curious among us. “Every receiver in the world decodes Subframe 4, Page 17,” Murdoch said in his new article. “Almost none of them have ever looked at it. The lesson generalizes: There is more to learn from the bytes already arriving at our antennas than from the bytes we wish were specified differently. The data are publicly available. The signal is overhead, twice a day, every day.”

And then …

By PPH • Score: 5, Funny Thread

… someone yelled “Bingo!”

As the old saying goes…

By GFS666 • Score: 5, Informative Thread
..the best way to hide a secret is to conceal it in plain sight within a mundane environment.

Somebody deserves a Medal.

By gurps_npc • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

This was freakin’ genius. Not only did they hide a secret communication system inside a military radio system, but there is more. The US graciously ‘gave’ permission for civilian use of the previously military only technology, allowing it to be spread throughout the world.

This way their agents could openly use the ‘civilian’ equipment to receive encrypted military information.

There is some genius American out there that for decades has been unable to brag. Maybe they can give him a medal now.

Remember those shortwave numbers stations?

By backslashdot • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Back in the 80s, and maybe early 90s too, you could listen on a certain shortwave frequencies and it was just some dude or a commie-sounding chick spitting out numbers. Whoa .. just googled it… turns to some of those stations are STILL operating:

The Buzzer (UVB-76 / MDZhB)The Operator: Russian Military.The Location: Originally near Moscow; currently broadcasted from transmitter sites near St. Petersburg and Pskov.The Sound: It has broadcasted a monotonous, buzzing tone 25 times per minute, 24 hours a day, since the late 1970s. Every few weeks, the buzzer stops, and a live voice reads Russian names and numbers (e.g., “Mikhail, Dmitri, Zhenya, Boris…”).
The Status: Active. You can still hear it today on 4.625 MHz.

HM01 The Operator: Cuban Directorate of Intelligence (DI).The Location: Broadcasted from transmitter sites outside Havana, Cuba.
The Sound: This station is famous for its technical errors, sometimes accidentally broadcasting radio stations like Radio Havana Cuba or Windows error sounds. It mixes a Spanish-speaking voice reading numbers with loud, screeching digital data bursts.
The Status: Active. It regularly targets Cuban agents operating in the United States.

The Lincolnshire Poacher (E03) The Operator: British Secret Intelligence Service (MI6).
  The Location: Broadcasted from RAF Akrotiri, a military base in Cyprus.
  The Sound: It began each hour with an electronic music box playing the English folk song “The Lincolnshire Poacher.” A female voice with a crisp British accent then read five-digit number groups.
The Status: Inactive. It went off the air in 2008.

Some hackers broke the encryption

By 93 Escort Wagon • Score: 4, Funny Thread

But all that’s stored in that message field is 867-5309.

Google Will Pay SpaceX $920 Million Per Month For Compute

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Ahead of its upcoming IPO, SpaceX announced that Google will pay the company $920 million per month for access to roughly 110,000 Nvidia GPUs and related compute infrastructure. Google says the agreement is short-term “bridge capacity” to meet stronger-than-expected demand for Gemini Enterprise, while SpaceX is using deals like this and its Anthropic contract to bolster its pitch for a historic public offering. TechCrunch reports:
The deal is similar in length and scope to the one SpaceX announced with Anthropic in late May. As part of that deal, Anthropic agreed to pay SpaceX $1.25 billion per month through 2029 to rent all the available compute from its Colossus 1 data center near Memphis, Tennessee that xAI — now part of SpaceX — originally built for its own artificial intelligence efforts.

Google’s deal appears to be paying for roughly half the amount of compute that Anthropic has access to at Colossus 1. SpaceX didn’t say which specific data center Google would be using. CEO Elon Musk has previously suggested his company would reserve the Colossus 2 data center for xAI. Anthropic was significantly limited in its compute capacity prior to its deal with SpaceX, raising usage limits on the same day the deal was announced. Google is in a very different position, with some estimates naming it as the world’s largest single owner of AI compute.

[…] Also like the Anthropic deal, the agreement with Google includes a cancellation clause. Both SpaceX and Google have the option to terminate the agreement with 90 days notice after December 31, 2026. Google’s access to the data center will ramp up “through September at a reduced fee,” according to the filing. “If we fail to deliver access to the committed amount of GPUs by September 30, 2026, then following a one-month grace period, Google may immediately terminate the agreement or accept the number of GPUs provided” with a reduction in the monthly fees, it reads.

What I’m reading

By MachineShedFred • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Sounds like Musk bought a shitload of GPUs that he doesn’t need, because nobody is using Grok besides idiots on Twitter to make “sick memes.”

If they have all those GPUs energized and can afford to lease them to their competition, that just tells us nobody is using them.

+$8000 per GPU per month.

By thesjaakspoiler • Score: 5, Funny Thread

That should be enough to cover the electricity bill and get a100% ROI within 6 months.

Re:Well.. Okay then…

By larryjoe • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Google is not comparing the costs or usability of chatbots versus traditional search. They are comparing someone else getting chatbots to replace a significant amount of their search traffic compared to Google doing the same and cannibalizing their own traditional search. It’s not a gross margin question for Google but an existential question.

the spacex ipo seems massively over valued

By Idimmu Xul • Score: 3 Thread

i think this is just some headline bait to get retail in so the VCs can dump on them

Don’t know why…

By LordHighExecutioner • Score: 3 Thread

…but big companies reselling each other GPU time is recalling what happened years ago with fiber bandwidth. I am stockpiling popcorn to enjoy the forthcoming show....

Bitcoin Falls To $60,000 As Zcash Bug Rocks Crypto

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Bitcoin briefly fell below $60,000 on Friday, “extending its weekly loss to nearly 20% and threatening to fall below $59,000,” reports CoinDesk. Crypto was also hit by a 40%-plus plunge in Zcash after Shielded Labs disclosed a years-old bug that could have allowed undetected counterfeit ZEC creation. From the report:
Now, with stocks in plunge mode — the Nasdaq down nearly 4% on Friday — bitcoin finds itself perfectly correlated. “Short term, Bitcoin feels like swallowing broken glass,” wrote Jeff Swanson Friday. “The chart goes up. It goes down. It makes grown men cry into their Robinhood accounts and CNBC anchors smugly declare the funeral, for the eleventh time.” “Here’s what uncomfortable people don’t understand: the discomfort is the yield. Every paper-handed panic seller is handing their future to someone with a longer time horizon and a colder storage device.”

[…] Earlier, Shielded Labs, a nonprofit developer on the privacy token system, disclosed a critical vulnerability in Zcash’s (ZEC) Orchard privacy pool that could have threatened the integrity of the token’s supply. The vulnerability, if exploited, could have allowed an attacker to create an unlimited number of counterfeit ZEC tokens, completely undetected. “Think of it as someone secretly gaining access to the Federal Reserve’s dollar printing press, except in this case, even the Fed wouldn’t be able to tell these extra dollars were printed,” wrote Omkar Godbole. Importantly, the vulnerability was discovered with help from Anthropic’s recently released Opus 4.8 AI model, raising difficult questions for the entire crypto industry. More to come on that. ZEC is now down 42% over the past 24 hours.
On Wednesday, the Zcash Foundation said: “The vulnerability was caught before any known exploitation occurred. There is no evidence of unauthorized value creation. Zcash’s turnstile mechanism (which tracks the total ZEC balance across all value pools) confirmed that the total supply remained intact throughout. User privacy was not affected. Sapling and transparent transactions continued operating normally throughout the incident.”

I was told this was a good investment

By wakeboarder • Score: 5, Funny Thread

better than gold…

Re:One day it started to fall, and didn’t stop

By Anonymous Coward • Score: 4, Informative Thread

With top tier governments like the state of Texas, El Salvador, and even the US going all in with cryptocurrencies

You mean the top tier governments who bought near the top? The ones who, as the Texas Comptroller said, were buying bitcoin “that strengthens the state’s balance sheet”.

They’re already down over 30%. Not sure that’s considered “strengthening” the balance sheet.

Re:A 50% correction is mild for bitcoin …

By drnb • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Then crypto is meant to be a currency.

That is just the aspiration of many tech enthusiasts.

I am sure most people who invested over the last 3 years did not expect their stable currency trade for crypto to be worth 1/2 or less than what they went in for.

No one imagined it is stable. Even those who buy/sell goods/services with bitcoin tend not to hold it. Buy and transfer immediately, receive and sell immediately, it avoids the volatility risk. As mentioned earlier, “investors” tend to know it is high risk/reward, very speculative.

Some people at the top of this pyramid scheme …

It’s not a pyramid scheme. It’s a “greater fool” scheme. Pyramid involves some sort of interest or dividends, greater fool involves increasing prices.

But they didn’t plan for this severe of a systematic collapse.

75-80% drops are not systematic collapses for bitcoin, its a run of the mill post-run up correction.

Re:One day it started to fall, and didn’t stop

By MachineShedFred • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Which they were all told, very loudly, at the time they were making their purchases.

It’s almost like people that don’t know what the hell they’re doing, might also not listen to people who actually do know what they’re doing. Everyone except these idiots knew this was a play to turn government balance sheets into bagholders for well-assetted individuals.

Re: I was told this was a good investment

By broward • Score: 4, Informative Thread

98% of investors don’t realize that the bitcoin miners have been losing money for 20 of the past 25 months since the last coin halving. they’re spending around $18 billion in energy to mine 165k coins at $70k. Do the math

the miners have been redirected assets away from Bitcoin to AI, the Bitcoin network has been oversaturated since August and doubled saturation rate in May.

https://www.scry.llc/2026/05/2…

ie. bitcoin is probably dropping 10% of its transactions now.

340 Local News Outlets Now Blocking the Internet Archive

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Techdirt:
Earlier this year Nieman Lab broke the story that major news publishers, including The New York Times, The Guardian, and USA Today Co., had started blocking the Internet Archive for fear that AI companies might scrape the nonprofit’s repositories for training data. As one of the last bastions of archival history, that is, in case you’re not aware, not very good for the public interest. Four months later and Nieman Lab now notes that the number of news outlets blocking the archive has soared to around 340 organizations:

“Our new analysis shows that more than 340 local news sites across the United States are now limiting the Internet Archive’s ability to access and preserve their stories. Many sites in our sample are owned by five of the seven largest local news publishers in the country: USA Today Co., McClatchy, Advance Local, MediaNews Group, and Tribune Publishing. The latter two are both subsidiaries of the “vulture hedge fund” Alden Global Capital.”

[…] Regardless of motivation, hiding whatever local news remains behind paywalls, then blocking it from the Internet Archive, in turn makes it harder for everyone else to do real journalism that relies on the historical record, local journalists tell Nieman Lab: “I cover news within a larger news desert in New York’s Rockland, Sullivan, and Rockland counties. This means I need to heavily rely on archival data of old news articles from now deceased, or zombie-fied, media outlets,” wrote B.J. Mendelson, the editor of The Monroe Gazette newsletter, in one recent petition signed by over 200 journalists. “Without the Internet Archive, my [work] would be incredibly difficult to do.”
The Internet Archive says it is listening to the concerns raised by local news outlets, while also partnering with journalism groups to train hundreds of newsrooms on archival preservation: “In December, the Internet Archive partnered with the Poynter Institute and Investigative Reporters and Editors to train a cohort of 33 local and national news outlets on how to develop and implement an archiving strategy. The initiative, funded through a Press Forward grant, aims to train 300 newsrooms in digital preservation and in using the Internet Archive’s services by the end of 2027.”

I’ll bet that isn’t the reason

By sheph • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
The real reason is because they don’t want any record of their factual inaccuracies.

Stealth

By JBMcB • Score: 5, Informative Thread
The NYT has a track record of stealth-edits.

https://www.poynter.org/ethics…

Wiping the archive makes it much more difficult to detect this stuff.

Less to do with AI than with bypassing paywalls

By brunes69 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

N/T

Everyone knows that you use Archive.org to bypass a paywall.

Legislate archives?

By txsable • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Perhaps Congress can give the Library of Congress the authority to compel the news sources to archive their output to a system run by the LoC, that escrows it for say… 30 days then makes it public? Also, the archive is immutable and once a story is pushed there it cannot be changed, so they can’t be rewriting history.....

Re:Legislate archives?

By karmawarrior • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Maybe we can just ban LLM operators spidering content without permission?

GOV.UK Goes Dutch On Payments As It Dumps Stripe

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
The UK’s Government Digital Service is replacing Stripe with Dutch payments provider Adyen for many GOV.UK Pay transactions, including local authorities, police forces, and armed forces units. The three-year deal covers about 1,000 services and is meant to make payments more flexible while keeping the user experience largely unchanged. The Register reports:
According to the tender notice published in February 2025, the contract covers around 17 percent of payments made through GOV.UK Pay but more than 70 percent of its organizations and includes the only option allowing users to start taking payments within one working day. At that point the contract had an estimated maximum value of £49 million, although with no guarantees over volume.

In a blogpost about the contract award on 2 June, GDS said it will migrate around 1,000 services to the new supplier. “We will make migration as straightforward as possible while complying with Know Your Customer legislation that protects everyone from fraud,” wrote Alan Maddrell, senior content designer for the service. “Most importantly, there will be no discernible difference for paying users and no loss in functionality.”

He added that the change of supplier will help introduce new options including pay by bank, which transfers money directly between bank accounts using open banking services and avoids the need to type in card details. GDS will continue to use WorldPay to process payments for central government, linked organizations and NHS bodies.

Re:Cost?

By tlhIngan • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Well, I’m sure governments get better rates. But yes, it’s likely a nationalism thing. Stripe, being American and Adyen being European. People are dropping American tech when they can switch, and I’m guessing the UK contract was up.

And while they may be expensive, it’s probably cheaper since they can handle card payments online without having to do all the PCI security stuff.

Re:Cost?

By Njovich • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Generally speaking Adyen rates are not expensive per transaction at all. Just you need a certain scale to make Adyen feasible, they basically only want to work with large parties.

BSA Lashes Out At Mandatory Open-Source Licensing

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Longtime Slashdot reader Elektroschock writes:
The American Business Software Alliance (BSA) does not consider mandatory open-source licensing to be an appropriate indicator of sovereignty. This is among the “pointed messages” they sent to the French government consultation (closed) today. “What protects Europe is the ability to govern, audit, and mitigate risk, not where a company files its corporate papers,” said Thomas Boue of BSA. “Criteria of this kind raise costs, reduce access to best-in-class security solutions, and risk conflicting with the EU’s international trade commitments.”

Of course

By abulafia • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
BSA is a sock with googley eyes glues on. Microsoft, Adobe, Oracle and other software audit enthusiasts are the hand inside.

Of course they don’t want Europe breaking dependency. It is like asking your dealer if you should get clean.

Re:That would be true

By JaredOfEuropa • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Example: Microsoft shared personal details, emails and meeting minutes of Dutch regulatory officials with the US House of Representatives, under the CLOUD Act. MS (and a few other BSA members) supported the act when it was proposed. So now they can lie in the bed they made.

Thomas Boue’s endless mouthfuls of lies

By JustAnotherOldGuy • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

“What protects Europe is the ability to govern, audit, and mitigate risk, not where a company files its corporate papers,” said Thomas Boue of BSA.

Ah yes, auditing closed-source software has always been a walk in the park, companies are only too happy to open up their proprietary trade-secret software so people can have a look, right?

Fuck Thomas Boue and his endless mouthfuls of lies.

Re:They are just afraid

By arglebargle_xiv • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
You can tell how beneficial a regulatory measure will be by looking at the groups it upsets.

In other news, water still wet.

By MachineShedFred • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I’m flabbergasted that a trade group consisting 100% of organizations that publish closed-source software would be worried about having to comply with other people’s licenses that require opening any changes / modifications / reuse made.

Google Says It Will Replenish More Water Than It Uses At Data Centers

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from 9to5Google:
There’s been a lot of pushback in recent months around the impact of AI data centers on local communities, with the use of water being a key issue for many. Google, in an expansion of its “water stewardship” programs, is making commitments that include replenishing more water than it uses at its data center sites. AI data centers go through a lot of water use in cooling the hardware used to power models, and Google is no exception. While Google stands by saying that the impact of AI data centers on U.S. water consumption is “small,” it also says it is focusing on “protecting local water resources in all aspects of our data center operations.”

In a post, Google explains five new commitments regarding water use at its data centers in the U.S. These include replenishing more water than is consumed at data centers, helping local utilities to modernize water infrastructure, using air-cooled solutions in areas where watersheds are at risk, “transparently” reporting water use at data centers, and focusing on “alternative and reclaimed” water solutions. […] In a linked paper (PDF), Google says it will replenish 120% of the water it uses at data center sites by 2030. Google is also committing $17 million to new water stewardship projects in Georgia, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, and Texas in addition to 165 other projects already in place throughout the U.S.

No they won’t

By CEC-P • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Reroute a river? Cloud seeding? Just lying about it and making it look correct on paper like Carbon Credits? You can’t just create water. This is such utter horse shit. As a hardware-oriented IT worker, what I want to know, is how the fuck you lose water in a closed loop cooling system? Are they just evaporating it? How the heck do you keep that water clean enough? Or is the water lost at power plant when the turbine spins and that’s what they’re talking about? How does a data center “use” water? They don’t.

Re:No they won’t

By Fly Swatter • Score: 5, Informative Thread
from the linked paper in the summary:

The Colorado River Indian Tribes project is a replenishment initiative that conserves water for Lake Mead through reduced withdrawals

Nope, that’s not replenishment - that’s just using less somewhere else. It’s like the carbon credits farce. You can’t replenish more than you used, which makes 120% just some number they pulled out of their ass for marketing. At least be honest and say ‘google will try to use less than currently.’

-Do no evil my ass

Re:Where does it go?

By jonathantn • Score: 4, Informative Thread
Typically the water go to an evaporative cooling tower outside to reduce the heat. As with all evaporative cooling, you lose some of that to evaporation and that has to be replenished. Some data centers perform rain water collection from their large roofs and use that to offset. Some data centers take the waste water treatment plant output and use that. Some data centers use geothermal to reject the heat into the ground (more niche but gaining momentum). I would encourage people to go research the amount of water consumed by data centers (including the power generation to run them) vs golf courses and almond farms in the United States. Something tells me that if you do that it will be eye opening numbers.

Re:No they won’t

By silentbozo • Score: 5, Informative Thread

I can’t find the citation for it, but in at least one case, part of the reported allocation of water for datacenters was due to the water consumed during construction. I would consider this kind of consumption legit if called out as a temporary usage of water, but FUD if just assumed as part of the overall calculation of ongoing water demand.

As for creating/destroying water:

https://www.fwpcoa.org/content…

“Air cooling (water-free): Many smaller or older data centers rely on air conditioning and chilled air circulation to remove heat. These use mechanical chillers or heat exchangers and do not consume water for cooling (aside from minimal water for humidification). Air cooling is common in cooler climates or where water is scarce, but it can require more electricity to run compressors or fans.
Evaporative cooling (open-loop): A majority of large, modern data centers use water-based cooling for better energy efficiency. This often involves cooling towers or evaporative chillers: warm water absorbs heat from servers and is then cooled by evaporation in a tower. As water evaporates into the air, it carries away heat â" dramatically cutting the electrical power needed for cooling. The trade-off is high water consumption. Most big data centers today use some form of evaporative cooling because it’s energy-efficient, especially in hot climates, but it directly uses water (often drawn from municipal supply).
Closed-loop water cooling: In closed-loop systems, water circulates in sealed pipes or coils that cool the servers without directly exposing water to air. Because the water isn’t evaporated to the environment, losses are minimal â" it’s mostly the same water recirculating (with some makeup water added occasionally). These systems can include water-cooled heat exchangers or liquid-to-liquid cooling loops. Closed-loop cooling can reduce freshwater use by up to 70% compared to traditional open evaporative methods. The downside is higher cost and complexity, but they are far more water-efficient since water isn’t âoeburned offâ into the air.”

“However, a growing number of data centers are now shifting to recycled water. Tech giants have begun partnering with utilities to use treated wastewater (effluent) for cooling instead of fresh drinking water. For instance, Google uses reclaimed or non-potable water at over 25% of its data center campuses (one notable example is its Douglas County, Georgia data center, which runs on recycled municipal wastewater). Amazon Web Services (AWS) announced in 2023 that 20 of its data centers are cooling with purified wastewater instead of potable water. After cycling through the cooling system, this water is sent back to the treatment plant to be cleaned and reused again. These initiatives leave more drinking-quality water for the community and exemplify the industry’s trend toward âoestrategic water sourcing.â Still, as of today, reclaimed water use is the exception. Most data centers worldwide are still using fresh water for cooling, although this is slowly changing with new projects and local regulations.”

So evaporative cooling “destroys” water. And using treated wastewater (pure enough to use for datacenter usage and probably irrigation, but still too ick for some people to drink directly - aka toilet to tap), if part of their investments were to purify even more water than the municipality was already processing, combined with closed loop usage could be considered “creating” water.

Your guess is as good as mine though, it all sounds like marketing hype in an attempt to combat FUD.

Re:Where does it go?

By fropenn • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

I would encourage people to go research the amount of water consumed by data centers (including the power generation to run them) vs golf courses and almond farms

And beaches, don’t forget beaches, they use huge amounts of water!

The issue is that these wealthy companies want to exploit local water sources, often in lower-income communities that already struggle to produce enough clean, inexpensive water for the people who already live there. There are no new golf courses being built (acres of courses in the U.S. is relatively stable), and acres of almond trees have gone down considerably in the last few years. So try proposing a new golf course or almond farm in the same community that is opposed to water-hogging data warehouses, and I think you’ll find the same response -> don’t exploit us for our water!

Valve Says Steam Machine ‘Shipping This Summer’

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Valve says its long-awaited Steam Machine and Steam Frame are both “shipping this summer.” The company is also expanding its Verified program beyond Steam Deck to cover the new hardware. “Steam Verified is a developer-focused program where game makers ensure that their titles are capable of running on the Deck (meaning they’ll run fine under Linux), that the UI elements and text are readable at standard resolutions, and that sensible default graphics settings are used,” notes Tom’s Hardware. From the report:
The news should ease the worries of many an expecting gamer, given today’s constant worries about AI servers slurping every RAM and NAND chip on the face of the earth, as well as Valve’s own statements about component scarcity delaying the release. Plus, the company always works on its own schedule, so much so that Valve Time is a term.

The release of the Machine has been taking flak, given that while Valve was initially hoping for an estimated $600 to $800 price — in the ballpark of the higher-end consoles — the rumored pricing is climbing around or over $1000. This fact is somewhat corroborated by a February statement from a Valve executive who, like most anyone in the world, stated the price revision was due to the AI-driven component shortage.

Re:unresolved: steam deck’s issue with displays

By ichthus • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

…1080 pixel monitors…

And you think you’re going to be a tech journalist? Yeah, I guess that tracks.

ISS Astronauts Told To Prepare For Possible Evacuation Over Air Leak

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot
NASA ordered astronauts on the International Space Station to shelter in their spacecraft and prepare for possible evacuation after a worsening air leak in the Russian Zvezda service module’s transfer tunnel. The Guardian reports:
The four astronauts of NASA’s Crew-12 mission on the station — two US astronauts, a French astronaut and a Russian cosmonaut — received orders from NASA mission control at 9.04am ET (2pm BST) on Friday to enter their Crew Dragon spacecraft docked to the station and don their spacesuits in case the air leak warranted an emergency evacuation, a NASA official said.

NASA and Russia’s space agency Roscosmos, the station’s two primary operators, have debated for months over the cause and potential fixes of small air leaks onboard Russia’s Zvezda service module, a key structure of the football-pitch-sized laboratory. The air leaks have been relatively minor in recent months. But on Monday the problem escalated from a pound of air per day to two pounds (0.9kg) a senior Nasa official told Reuters on condition of anonymity.
UPDATE: “Roscosmos has paused Friday’s structural repair efforts inside the Zvezda service module transfer tunnel, known as PrK, as more measurements and data is assessed,” Bethany Stevens, a spokesperson for NASA, posted on X.

“Given this development, NASA has instructed the crew members inside the Dragon spacecraft to end the safe haven procedures and return to planned operations aboard the International Space Station. We look forward to working with Roscosmos on a collaborative approach to address the leaks.”

Developing…

Re:Question

By SlashbotAgent • Score: 4, Informative Thread

My math(assuming 94kPa to vaccuum) puts the “hole” at 0.2mm to leak 1kg per day.

Re:Question

By TheMiddleRoad • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
My guess is, and I’m just going off of the obvious, that you don’t know dick about what’s going on or how to fix it.

Russians broke it, let them fix it

By Thud457 • Score: 4, Funny Thread
Close the hatch to the Russian section, not our problem.

Oh, NOW they want international cooperation.

Vacuum Exposure

By hwstar • Score: 3 Thread

You know you’re in trouble when you feel the saliva boiling on your tongue.

“In 1966, NASA aerospace engineer and spacesuit technician Jim LeBlanc experienced the terrifying reality of vacuum exposure during a spacesuit test in a vacuum chamber at Johnson Space Center. When a pressurization hose accidentally disconnected, his suit depressurized to a near-vacuum. Before passing out from hypoxia in about 14 seconds, his last conscious memory was feeling the saliva on his tongue begin to boil.”

Re: ISS was a mistake born of wishful thinking.

By WaffleMonster • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Oh please get your head out of your ass, the west is just as much responsible for the war in Ukraine as Russia is.

Russia and Russia alone is responsible for their war of genocide and conquest against Ukraine. Here is one of my all time favorite clips from the Russians on the Ukraine war. Not even the Indians who DGAF were buying his nonsense. Also listen to what horse face says about cooperation with the west.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?…

To this day Russians continue to push absurd it wasn’t us, we didn’t start it propaganda. Occasionally you get people in the west dumb enough to fall for it… CTR biolabs, Donbas, NATO, Victoria Nuland… ad nausea.

Why deorbit the station at all, why not reuse parts of it with newer stations or sent it to towards the moon. Or just keep it as a rescue haven. Getting new stations up there will be easier when vehicles like Starship are ready, but for now we need more stations up there. And instead of banning everything russian try to cooperate more, hostility doesn’t work.

I disagree, ISS is scheduled for termination in four years anyway. Russians waging wars of conquest against other sovereign states who have done nothing to provoke invasion is a good enough reason not to cooperate or help them in any way until they stop. There is no practical means of salvaging parts of the station and it can’t be operated by either the Russians or the Americans alone.