Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. MIT Researchers Used GPT-6 Astra To Edit Qwen’s Open Weights Directly, Boosting Math Scores
  2. Cops Bust Botnet of 1.3 Million Android TV Boxes
  3. China Publicly Discloses Plan For a Lunar Landing Within Three Years
  4. BYD Sold More EVs Last Month Than the US Did All Quarter
  5. Snap Reaches Settlement In Social Media Addiction Lawsuit Ahead of Trial
  6. Study Claims Vizio Simply Ignores ‘Smart’ TV Spying Opt Out Requests
  7. Apple HomeView Ultra, Drone and Laundry-Folding Robot Reportedly In Development
  8. SpaceX Is Reportedly Looking At Buying Boost Mobile
  9. OpenAI Might Rebrand Its Data Centers As ‘AI Compute Campuses’
  10. The New York Times Sues Brave Web Browser For AI Scraping, Bypassing Paywalls
  11. Microsoft’s Canada Timezone Troubles Leave Admins Fixing Calendars, Pretending They’re In Bogota
  12. Marvell to Buy Lumentum In $115 Billion Bet On AI Connectivity
  13. Supermarket Freezers Across Europe Hit By Second Suspected Cyberattack
  14. Itch Is Being Flooded By AI-Generated Garbage
  15. Bad Flock Info Leads Police To Tow Wrong Car, Then Towing Company Totals It

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

MIT Researchers Used GPT-6 Astra To Edit Qwen’s Open Weights Directly, Boosting Math Scores

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from VentureBeat:
Researchers from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Computer Science & Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (CSAIL) reported today that they used OpenAI’s GPT-6 Astra language model to raise a small, open source Qwen model’s math score roughly sixfold by directly editing its weights — the numerical parameters that govern its behavior. Rikiya Takehi, Jayden Teoh, Alex Zhang and Omar Khattab described their work in a research blog post published November 2. They call the approach “weight-space programming” and tested Astra’s ability to interpret and alter networks without using conventional training procedures to generate the edits.

In the strongest language-model example, Astra’s intervention raised Qwen3.5-0.8B’s MATH-500 score from 7.9% to 48.1% while touching approximately 0.016% of its weights. The improvement came primarily from correcting repetitive reasoning—a distinction that shaped both the technical findings and the debate over their implications. Their experiments explored a broader possibility: AI systems that inspect, repair and construct other neural networks by working directly on their internal machinery.
“This is cool as heck!” wrote Yuchen Jin, a technical staffer at Databricks and former co-founder and CTO of Hyperbolic Labs who was unaffiliated with the research, on X. “Imagine using a large LLM to directly edit a smaller model’s weights and dramatically improve its capabilities. It’s like gene editing for neural networks. Even cooler than distillation!”

Voyage AI staff researcher Chandan Singh, formerly of Microsoft AI, also reacted to the findings: “For anyone questioning whether this post is overhyped, I think they are actually *underselling* the approach.”

Cops Bust Botnet of 1.3 Million Android TV Boxes

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
A coalition of security firms working with Japan’s National Police Agency has disrupted a botnet of more than 1.3 million Android devices across 200+ countries. “We assess with high confidence that the backdoor and botnet were intentionally developed, deployed, and operated for financial gain by Videostrong Technology,” the Google Threat Intelligence Group (GTIG) said in a blog post. The Register reports:
Videostrong Technology is a hardware manufacturer based in Shenzhen, China. It builds Android devices, including home TV boxes and projectors. According to Google, Videostrong deliberately embedded the XCPE backdoor in device firmware and sold access to criminal affiliates, allowing them to install additional malware modules on devices shipped to unsuspecting customers. When buyers connected these devices to their home networks, the preinstalled backdoor allowed operators to create proxy networks and hide malicious traffic using the customers’ internet connections without their knowledge.

The firmware’s pre-installed management agent purported to be a standard remote-management client, according to TrendAI. It pulled updates from a GitHub page, and connected to a Message Queuing Telemetry Transport (MQTT) server that gave the operator full remote control of each box, allowing them to install and remove apps, change settings, and push updates to the infected devices. Between June 3 and October 1, TrendAI documented more than 3.8 million distinct home and mobile IP addresses connected to the operation.

The coalition also disrupted the command-and-control domains used to manage the affiliate modules. “Because these affiliates each have diversified distribution channels for their modules beyond XCPE, we assess that taking down their C2 domains will sever access to at least 10 million additional compromised devices,” according to GTIG. Google said it had since cut ties with Videostrong, and banned the OEM from making devices with preloaded Google apps.

Cool, now do LG

By Hentes • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Cool, now do LG, and every other TV manufacturer. They are all doing this.

I Fail To See The Problem

By classiclantern • • Score: 3 • Thread
I read the article. Every Smart Device available today has adware, malware and spam. Every smart device downloads updates and refreshes ads. Every Android phone sends telemetry and personal data back to the manufacturer and undisclosed affiliates for the purpose of stealing as much money as possible from Customers. The only complaint anyone can have with this Botnet is that it wasn’t disclosed in the Terms of Service. I use a Spectrum modem, Roku TV, Chinese security cameras, an Apple computer and Plex so, it would not surprise me to learn that one or all of these Chumps allows “affiliates’ to “to install and remove apps, change settings, and push updates to the infected devices.” That’s how things work today. It’s right there in the Terms of Service. Pleas explain the difference.

Easy answer

By eneville • • Score: 3 • Thread

With all the problems “smart” devices bring, just get a laptop with broken screen and hdmi it to the telly. Don’t configure WiFi on the telly.

Are You a Bot?

By bill_mcgonigle • • Score: 3 • Thread

Allegedly this is how many AI companies are scraping the web for training data.

No IP ranges to effectively blacklist.

China Publicly Discloses Plan For a Lunar Landing Within Three Years

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
At the Seventh Manned Spaceflight Conference in Beijing, Chinese space officials publicly outlined the most detailed roadmap yet for landing astronauts on the Moon “before 2030.” Ars Technica reports:
China’s lunar landings will involve a lunar-orbit rendezvous similar to what NASA did in the 1960s and early 1970s with the Apollo program. However, lacking a rocket as powerful as the Saturn V vehicle, the crew and lunar lander will launch separately to the Moon. According to slides shared on social media, the current plan involves:

- An uncrewed test of the Long March 10A rocket (a single-stick variant, with no boosters) and the Mengzhou spacecraft to low-Earth orbit. Target: early 2027
- An uncrewed test of the larger Long March 10 rocket (a core stage with two boosters) and the Lanyue lunar lander, including descent/ascent from Moon’s surface. Target: 2028
- A concurrent launch of two Long March 10 rockets, one carrying uncrewed Mengzhou and the other the Lanyue vehicle; they will dock in lunar orbit. Target: 2029
- Dual launch of Long March 10 rockets, this time with crew on the Mengzhou spacecraft, leading to crewed landing mission. Target: “Before 2030”

The public release of this new information provides a timeline for gauging China’s technical progress in its efforts to land humans on the Moon before 2030 and beat NASA and the United States back to the lunar surface. Notably, the plan (for now, at least) omits a mission similar to Apollo 8 or Artemis II, which involved a crew flying out to the Moon and either entering orbit or passing close by before returning to Earth. The Mengzhou vehicle should still get a workout closer to Earth with humans on board as part of missions carrying astronauts to Tiangong, China’s space station in low-Earth orbit.

Re:Why?

By T34L • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread
Why leave the bed in the morning? I agree there’s plenty of frequently proposed outer space missions that are dumb as shit and waste of time and resources at this particular junction (Mars base/“colonization” or even terraforming attempts, for one), but a base on the moon can help us learn a lot about humans and an incredible amount of things about Earth and the rest of solar system, while costing us less as a planet than say, the travel of the 1%ers to a single superbowl.

Re:Why?

By phantomfive • • Score: 4, Informative • Thread
According to their stated purpose:

1) National security (because humanity decided we couldn’t trust each other, we decided to keep building weapons).

2) National pride (raise the scientific and cultural levels of China, the want to be the world’s best).

3) Innovation, discovery, science/technology improvement, the reasons everyone gives etc.

Great! A space race is better than WW3

By butt0nm4n • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Get as many people on the moon as we can to look back on earth and see how small, vulnerable and precious our planet is.

Then perhaps we can get some global leaders more interested in preserving it than having gold ballrooms and wasteful wars to pad their egos.

Re:Great! A space race is better than WW3

By Misagon • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

And if Trump hadn’t previously withdrawn from an agreement that would have limited Iran’s nuclear program, the war would probably not have happened either.

Re:Great! A space race is better than WW3

By gtall • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

So, what is your plan, General? Invade a country of 93.4 million people who have history of not buckling under to anyone? You first.

Of you could inflict some serious Christian War Crimes on them in the hopes they will buckle and won’t hold a grudge for the next 100 years. Hint: look at the history of the Middle East and how long their grudges last.

Or you could bomb the rubble some more and watch Iran take out what is left of the U.S. bases in the region and destroy the region’s oil economy. Frankly, it would do a world of good for global warming, so that might be a good idea....except for the number of dead people around the Gulf and beyond.

All la Presidenta has succeeded in doing is spending down our treasury and the U.S. munitions piles, and simultaneously given the Iranian regime a new lease on life. Prior to this, the Iranian people were thinking about putting the heads of Iranian leadership and their stooges (Rev. Guard, Basij) on pikes. Now, that crowd looks like it will be there for at least the next 100 years.

Is there anything el Bunko cannot bankrupt, financially and morally?

BYD Sold More EVs Last Month Than the US Did All Quarter

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Electrek:
The world’s leading EV maker is showing no signs of slowing down. BYD sold 490,168 new energy vehicles (NEVs) in October, up 11% from the prior year and the company’s highest monthly total in 2026. BYD’s battery electric vehicles drove the growth, with a record 305,743 units sold, up 37% year over year and marking the first time its EV sales have crossed the 300,000 mark. To put that into perspective, just over 262,500 EVs were sold in the US in the entire third quarter combined, according to Kelley Blue Book estimates.
By the end of the year, BYD expects overseas shipments to reach about 2 million vehicles. “In 2027, that number is expected to rise to more than 2.5 million vehicles,” adds Electrek.

Re:they will keep selling them

By ArchieBunker • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

What makes you think BYD is incapable of making a car that lasts? https://insideevs.com/features…

The fact that domestic automakers are lobbying for an import ban tells me everything.

Re:they will keep selling them

By Zero__Kelvin • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
Why would you say that? Oh, Because China? Can you offer any rationale for this prediction? Is there any reason to believe BYD cards will have any less longevity? Why would the rest of the car wind up in a junk yard rather than recycled? Surely you won’t just tell us “the most likely thing” without sharing your well thought out analysis with the rest of us?

Re:they will keep selling them

By nickovs • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Speaking of the 1970s, back then the whole US car industry (and large swaths of the European industry too) said that Japanese cars were poor quality and would never make it in the open market. They were very wrong and suffered the consequences.

There’s plenty not to like about the way that the Chinese EV business operates. Their factories were massively subsidised by state intervention so their cost doesn’t reflect the full cost of the capital expense that goes into them and the exports are priced based on a glut of supply.

That said, the world would be wrong to write them off as cheap crap. Their mass market small cars aren’t made for the US customer, but don’t think that they can’t make cars like that if they think that they will make a killing (financially or strategically) by doing so.

Re:they will keep selling them

By phantomfive • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

I think for the most part in the US, the EV market is saturated…

At the current price point. When they cost $15,000 each, that will open a new market segment.

Re:they will keep selling them

By serviscope_minor • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Unless you have offstreet parking

The USA is so spread out that everyone needs to drive gasoline cars everywhere yet somehow so compact no one has a drive to charge an EV.

Snap Reaches Settlement In Social Media Addiction Lawsuit Ahead of Trial

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Snap has settled a lawsuit brought by two teenagers who alleged Snapchat was deliberately designed to be addictive and contributed to their mental health problems, avoiding a trial that was scheduled to begin this week. Snap was the last defendant to settle after Meta, Alphabet and TikTok resolved claims in the same case. CBS News reports:
The teenage plaintiffs, identified in court documents as S.J. and K.D.B., had alleged in the suit that Snapchat was designed to be addictive and that using the platform from a young age contributed to their mental health issues. “We are glad to reach resolution for our clients,” Mark Lanier, founder of The Lanier Law Firm and lead counsel for the plaintiffs, said in a statement to CBS News. “We believe this jury would have found the companies’ conduct reprehensible.”

Snap was the last social media company named in the lawsuit to settle the case, which was set for opening arguments this week. Meta resolved claims last week, while Alphabet and TikTok, the other defendants, each also resolved the allegations. Terms of the Snap settlement were undisclosed […].
Earlier this year, a jury found Meta and Google-owned YouTube liable in a landmark social media addiction lawsuit, awarding $6 million in damages to a young woman who alleged the platforms’ addictive features harmed her mental health. In August, Meta also agreed to pay up to $18 billion in settlements and introduce new child-safety measures to resolve claims from dozens of U.S. states that it deliberately designed Facebook and Instagram to addict children while misleading the public about their risks.

Study Claims Vizio Simply Ignores ‘Smart’ TV Spying Opt Out Requests

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Techdirt:
Recently, reports emerged that LG TVs are sniffing around your local network, and even listening to your local environment, even when the TV is purportedly “off.” Some of those voice commands were then stored in plain text and uploaded to the internet. LG’s response? To deny everything. […] That latter point is central to a new study out of Northeastern that conducted 5,943 experiments across twelve commercial “smart” TV devices. The researchers found that most smart TVs utilize automatic content recognition (ACR), a technology that captures audio or video snapshots of viewed content and then monetizes that data to help build personalized profiles of viewers.

TV makers insist that users are supposed to be able to opt out, but the choice simply doesn’t work across a large segment of TVs. Companies like Vizio simply ignored the consumer requests entirely more often than not: “We find that the advertised ACR opt-out fully suppresses ACR-attributable traffic on only four operating systems; on Samsung Tizen traffic consistent with ACR activity persists in more than 60% of evaluated scenarios, and on Vizio SmartCast a content correlated endpoint hosted on Amazon Kinesis continues to receive traffic in 100% of opted-out scenarios.”

[…] The researchers say since they can’t see the precise scope of what’s being collected due to encryption, they’re unsure whether Vizio is technically violating its FTC agreement (not that we have a current FTC that would care if they were): “The opt-out setting has no observable effect on traffic sent to this endpoint; however, we cannot inspect the payload due to encryption so we cannot confirm whether this violates the FTC settlement.” Results of whether opting out of ACR tracking actually stopped ACR tracking were all over the map. Roku, for example, ignores opt-out requests when users are watching Roku’s own channels. None of the smart TV vendors track Netflix viewing for fear of violating agreements with the streaming giant. Samsung’s opt out function was more likely to actually work when a user was watching antenna broadcasts.

On two Smart TV platforms, personal viewing data collected by ACR remains unencrypted, despite years of bad press and scandal on the subject. Many appear to be violating the law, but because U.S. regulatory oversight has been gutted, they see no meaningful accountability. That includes smart TV OS’ like VIDAA, which is most prominently found on Hisense and Toshiba smart TVs: “VIDAA OS sends ACR data to servers run by Unruly over MQTT without encryption, so anyone on the network path between the TV and those servers can read it. Each message carries a Client ID, a permanent identifier for the TV that can’t be reset, along with the time zone, the app name, the input (antenna, HDMI), the antenna channel and an audio fingerprint.”

Just don’t connect it.

By magzteel • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Don’t connect the TV to your network. Don’t use the smart apps, they usually suck anyway.
Connect a streaming stick you like to an HDMI input and you’re done.

This is what keeps me on projectors.

By TigerPlish • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

This is the biggest thing that keeps me on projectors.

At least for now, the projectors I buy are dumb as a brick, and apple TV is also pretty dumb, it doens’t have ACR. My HTPC is from 2011, it’s positively jurassic, so it also is not gonna rat me out.

There is zero incentive for me to add a “TV” to this house. none. If I needed a 2nd display, i’d find the gnarliest, largerst “monitor” and use that.

I knew the programming content in TV had quickly gone to shit once the Reality Show became a thing but the hardware has suffered tremendously since the days of CRT Trinitrons.

I really want no part of this TV future. Those affected, sharpen your suing pencils, fight the good fight, ‘tho all you’ll get is a dime for every million dollars they make. Good luck, and all that.

Re:So who was President in 2017?

By SeaFox • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

Do you really think $1.5 million was a fair penalty from a federal agency? Note that New Jersey fined them $1.1 million — that was just for one state. Charging a pittance fine now means the companies have “paid their restitution” and some later administration can’t come after them with a real punishment later. He’s doing them a favor.

Re:Just don’t connect it.

By taustin • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

At which point, it will probably look for alternate open WiFi that’s not restricted.

Best to not buy a smart TV at all.

Re:Just don’t connect it.

By PPH • • Score: 4, Informative • Thread

So Vizio has a secret handshake deal with Xfinity. I wouldn’t be surprised if they have such a deal with cellular carriers as well.

You’re just not safe unless you are on a desert island. Then Starlink flies over ....

Apple HomeView Ultra, Drone and Laundry-Folding Robot Reportedly In Development

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
According to The Information, Apple is developing a $1,000 HomeView Ultra smart home hub with a 9-inch touchscreen mounted on a motorized arm that can follow users around a room and autonomously respond to its surroundings. It’s also said to be experimenting with more ambitious home robots, including a wheeled robot that follows people, a smart home drone and a machine capable of folding laundry. Notebookcheck reports:
According to the report, HomeView Ultra will feature a larger 9-inch touchscreen mounted on a robotic arm. This arm can automatically turn the screen toward the user. With a camera and several sensors, this smart home hub is said to be “fully aware” of its surroundings and capable of acting autonomously. This autonomy ranges from turning on the lights when someone enters the room to shooing a cat away when it jumps onto a table. These sensors are also intended to prevent the arm from hitting nearby objects with the display.

Apple is reportedly currently planning to announce this smart home hub in 2027 for around $1,000, but according to The Information, its launch could be delayed until 2028. The reason is allegedly the software, which has not yet been finalized, while the hardware is said to be ready for market already.

I’d rather....

By b0s0z0ku • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread
I’d rather live in a rat and roach infested hovel than allow a “cleaning” (aka surveillance) clanker into my home. And no, I don’t have an Echo, nor a smart vacuum. Thankfully. Ludd is good.

Cat Herder

By cruff • • Score: 3 • Thread
Someone got tired of their cat(s) being on the counter. They’ve invented a cat nanny and the execs tacked on a bunch of other useless features.

SpaceX Is Reportedly Looking At Buying Boost Mobile

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
SpaceX has reportedly held talks with EchoStar about acquiring Boost Mobile or gaining access to its network, potentially giving Starlink a shortcut toward becoming a full-fledged U.S. mobile carrier. Engadget reports:
According to Washington Post’s sources, the deal could look like SpaceX acquiring Boost Mobile outright or gaining access to its cell network, which is leased from AT&T and T-Mobile. There could be a major hitch with the deal though, since SpaceX’s potential mobile service would need the green light from those major mobile carriers, according to the report. The Washington Post also reported that major cell companies, which include AT&T, T-Mobile and Verizon, have already turned down Musk down for access to its cell networks in order to launch a separate SpaceX service.
Last month, SpaceX reportedly held talks with Crown Castle to access at least 80,000 cellular tower sites across the U.S. as it prepares to launch Starlink Mobile. “We will be building out our terrestrial networks so there’s broad-based connectivity anywhere that SpaceX and Starlink are allowed to operate,” Musk said during SpaceX’s earnings call this week. Satellite launches plus spectrum acquisition “will pave the way for Starlink Mobile to become a major mobile carrier in the US,” he said.

Sherman Act

By b0s0z0ku • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
Time to go full-on T.R. trust-buster on Elon Musk and the companies he controls. He’s gotten too big for his britches - countries where the tall poppy gets scythed down have the correct approach.

Re:Sherman Act

By Archangel Michael • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

So, Three companies good, four is anti-competitive? When T-Mobile bought Sprint, where you for or against that merger?

Just wanting the logic here.

Re:Why though, Starlink should working everywhere.

By edi_guy • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

SpaceX spent about $10-15 billion on the current number of starlink sattelites. And now they need to spend billions more on a third rate cell phone leasee ? Given that there are only three actual networks, Verizon, ATT, T-mobile and that you can get a Mint plan for $10-$15/mo before taxes, and cell signal coverage is not really a problem for 99% of the population 99% of the time.. I really don’t get the business case.

Feels like a Virgin Corp sorta play. They wanted to brand a bunch of stuff, where it was just their brand and nothing value-add. Virgin mobile, Virgin money, Virgin America airlines. But who really wants to be Musk or X-branded?

Re:Wrong title

By ArchieBunker • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

“What day/night will be the wildest party on your island?” Musk wrote in an email to Epstein in November 2012, according to the newly released files.

https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/e…

Patrick Boyle explained to this

By rsilvergun • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread
He has a good video about the SpaceX IPO where he explains it. Basically it’s very expensive for SpaceX to provide data services of any kind. They cannot compete with terrestrial data services when those are an option. Nobody is going to pay extra for satellite internet when they can just have a physical line to their house or apartment or can have access to Cellular radio service.

The market for SpaceX is people that do not have access to terrestrial services because they’re out in the boondocks and they don’t have any other options. That market exists however it’s got a cap because if you ever get enough people in a single area that form a large addressable market then somebody runs some cable to them or builds cell towers and suddenly you just lost your market.

Mr Boyle brought this up in the context of how SpaceX cannot possibly generate enough income to justify its valuation and that it’s very likely that SpaceX is just a scam to rip off our retirement savings and our 401ks.

But getting back to the point they’re not going to use starlink for cellular internet because it can’t compete with regular cellular service. It’s just too expensive to keep all those satellites going.

OpenAI Might Rebrand Its Data Centers As ‘AI Compute Campuses’

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from TechCrunch:
Data centers are deeply unpopular. But what if we called them something else? Axios reports that OpenAI is preparing a “PR blitz” for after the midterm elections on Tuesday, as Democrats seem likely to win back the House of Representatives, and possibly the Senate, too. The company’s chief global affairs officer Chris Lehane told Axios that the midterms will be “a bit of a movie trailer for what you’re going to see in 2028,” when he expects AI to be “the issue” in the presidential election.

So OpenAI is to influence the AI debate moving forward, with Lehane discussing several proposals, including the development of AI “speed limits”; finding ways to help people see AI as empowering them in their daily lives; pushing the U.S. to take a role in developing global standards; and yes — rebranding data centers as “AI compute campuses.” Lehane also described the conversation around data centers (a debate that has pushed Amazon and Microsoft to say they will no longer use NDAs in their negotiations with local governments) as “good and healthy.” “Communities should hold companies responsible and accountable so they really and truly get a transformative benefit from these projects,” he said.

go all the way

By awwshit • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

These are not data centers. These are dorms for autonomous superintelligent beings. You wouldn’t hurt an Agent, would you?

Re:Alternative branding

By Retired Chemist • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
Apparently, a lot of people. They keep voting for idiots.

Idiots.

By MachineShedFred • • Score: 4, Informative • Thread

“Hey, let’s ignore the actual problems of why people are against us building data centers everywhere, and instead we’ll just change the name!”

And then they wonder why people want to screw these guys with their pants on. Renaming the thing doesn’t materially change the thing, and just pisses people off because you clearly see there is a problem, and choose not to address the problem and instead play games.

That makes it better…

By gweihir • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

May I suggest a few more names?
“Breadless bakeries” - They surely generate enough heat
“Sound distribution centers” - Apparently, these are really loud
“Landscape heaters” - See above
“Silicon stress test facilities” - Nothing wrong with testing stuff, right?

Re: It’s not that simple, tough guy.

By OrangeTide • • Score: 4, Informative • Thread

Clinton, Obama, Carter, and FDR would be the heavy hitters in living memory on the IQ chart. Just because I disagree with someone’s politics or values doesn’t mean one of us must be an idiot.

The New York Times Sues Brave Web Browser For AI Scraping, Bypassing Paywalls

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
The New York Times and several other publishers have sued (PDF) Brave Software, accusing the browser maker of scraping their websites without permission and helping users bypass paywalls. The Verge reports:
According to a complaint (PDF) filed by the companies that run New York Daily News, the Chicago Tribune, and the Orlando Sentinel, Brave Software has monetized its index of scraped websites by, in part, providing AI companies with paid access to “real-time online content from the Brave Index.” The AI companies then use that index to train their models, access content to “respond to specific user queries,” or both. Brave has allegedly provided “stolen copyrighted content” to “many” AI companies including Anthropic, Perplexity, Mistral, xAI, and Cohere. Brave also promotes “hundreds of top publishers” as being accessible through its “Paywall blocker” feature in its browser.

“Brave has never asked for the Publishers’ permission to access their websites, much less to copy the material and provide it to users or other AI companies,” the complaint says. “On the contrary, as noted above, Brave allows its users to bypass the Publishers’ paywalls without their consent, and has taken other steps that prevent the Publishers from blocking Brave’s access to the Publishers’ websites. Brave has never compensated the Publishers for the unlawful use, copying, and distribution of the Publishers’ copyrighted content.”
“While we believe in the ethical and responsible use and development of AI, Brave has flouted established copyright law and ignored repeated requests by The Times to stop its infringing conduct,” Graham James, an NYT spokesperson, says in a statement. “We filed this lawsuit to hold Brave accountable for stealing our content to power its own products and to provide it to some of the most prominent and well resourced generative AI companies in the world.”

Re:I use Firefox

By Himmy32 • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

And unsurprisingly the New York Times isn’t super worried about the tiny segment of population bypassing through sketchy Russian sites. But the whole market lost billions of dollars last week because of how much money AI answers are sucking out of advertising and subscriptions. Google lost half of a trillion dollars in value. That’s big enough of an issue to generate lawsuits.

All of this is unsurprising as the the value proposition for Brave from the start was removing the monetization strategies of content makers. At some point someone needs to pay either with subscriptions or advertising eyeball time.

Unfortunate that Brave Search will also be affected as the “Brave Index” powers both the API for LLMs and the search engine, which is one of the few that the results haven’t been slowly getting worse.

Big guy going after the little guy - precedent

By Puls4r • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
This is classic “big guy” going after the “little guy” in the hopes that they can use their money and clout to financially bury Brave. And when they manage to do it, they’ve set a precedent they can use in other court cases. Fuck the New York Times. Fuck their new “fair and balanced” bullshit. Direct quote from them: “expand its coverage of conservative viewpoints”

I see this as 2 different issues

By dirk • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

The first issue is if the only thing it takes to get around these sites paywalls is disabling some scripts, then they don’t have a paywall at all. There are ways to put your content behind a paywall so it cannot be accessed (see porn sites). If they are just running a script to stop you, then I have no issue with Brave disabling that script to allow users to run the page without it. Sorry NYT, get a better paywall.

The second issue is the bigger one. If they are truly accessing these sites and scaping the data and offering it to other companies, that is an entirely different thing. That is basically taking the content and redistributing it, which is a huge deal. I would side with the NYT on that one.

Re:Screw the New York Times

By hierofalcon • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

I don’t have a problem with digital distribution of news. I subscribed to the print WSJ for a very long time. But with our wonderful US mail service, the print edition would arrive in batches, days late. It became worthless. So I switched to digital once monitors got a high enough resolution that I could read the print edition in digital format. I still skip the ads. It’s even faster to right arrow over full page ads now than to turn a page manually, and it’s available first thing in the morning instead of when I get off work and already stale by a day or more depending on the US mail. So I’m a fan of digital news.

But the WSJ exists because of their content and price points. A bloomberg terminal is out of my price range. The WSJ is okay for budget conscious people. If it had a comics page I’d be even happier. And I suspect that providing some of their content to the world - say a few articles a month - doesn’t hurt them much. A bundle with IBD and Barron’s is pretty reasonable.

But I gave up on the local paper quite a while ago. Too little local news coverage, and anything important was going to be in the WSJ anyway. And their subscription price for a year was higher than WSJ.

I suppose there are a few columnists in the NYT or daily that people don’t think they can live without, but it is really about content for every newspaper. If you provide timely content that is unique and worthwhile, people will pay for a subscription. If you don’t, or are just one of many AP or other news feed suppliers, you shouldn’t be surprised when nobody wants to subscribe. But it is also largely about reputation. People aren’t going to sign up for a subscription or expose an e-mail address just to view an article. If you are worthwhile, people will subscribe on their own. But they aren’t likely to subscribe to some unknown paper (or even a well known paper like the NYT) if they don’t need it for local news. I live a long way from NYC. I might read an article if it was free, but I have no interest in paying a subscription price for all the NYC local content that doesn’t matter to me.

Re:Screw the New York Times

By SomePoorSchmuck • • Score: 4, Informative • Thread

They sold advertising space on the make believe notion that x number of eyeballs saw every ad. It was always bogus.

No, they didn’t.
At no point did anyone in publishing/advertising believe that putting a 3-inch single column ad in the Lifestyle & Arts section F of a newspaper with a circulation of 347,000 meant that the ad was seen by 347,000 different people. The fact that you personally may have never looked at ads (which, if you’re being honest, is almost certainly not true unless you were born after 1990ish) doesn’t matter. Everyone in publishing/advertising understood that they weren’t getting 347,000 “pageviews” - they were making sure that their ad had a high chance of being seen/noticed by the percentage of readers who see/notice ads. And up until 2005-2010, that was still a large percentage.

Back before ~2010, and especially once you go back to 1960-2000, Americans deliberately, voluntarily, looked at advertisements in newspapers and magazines because that was how you found out what stores were out there, what the stores sold, what current prices were. It was common for people to dellberately flip through the inserts for stores like Sears, Montgomery Ward, JCPenney, Dillards, Kmart, WalMart, REI, Circuit City, Best Buy, as well as all the inserts and wrappers for local grocery stores, car dealerships, real estate listings, garage sale listings, movie theatre showtimes, on and on.

Ads were a normal, accepted part of the socioeconomic biome. It sounds wild now, but we used to live in harmony with them. When you didn’t care about them you could easily ignore them. When you cared about them - and every adult at some point did care about them, to buy a car, a refrigerator, rent an apartment, find the lowest price on brisket, get the Domino’s pizza coupons for this week’s big game - you could easily find them and were glad they existed.

The modern seething revulsion toward advertising is a creation of the Internet, where ads escaped ecological equilibrium and evolved into invasive species which consume every possible space alongside the content and, when that space was not enough, the content itself became an ad - “I built this AI agent that lowered my car insurance by $130 month and you can too! Link in bio.”

Nor were all ads the same. Which section, where on the page, sizing, layout, full color, section wrappers, extra inserts, etc. all had different costs. When ads weren’t invasive - when they just sat there on a page rather than popup, flash, wiggle, trigger effects when your mouse happened to hover over, autoplay sound, autoplay video, drive-by download malware, etc.etc - you saw the ads that might matter to you, organically. If you didn’t need to buy a car and didn’t find cars interesting, you never opened the Automotive section of the paper, so none of those ads were ever seen by you. But those who were into cars or were in the market for a car, did look at that section and did see those ads. Same for people who were or were not interested in art galleries, the symphony, cultural festivals, cinema.

It’s quite ironic that the aggressive targetmaxxing of Google and the other major Internet advertising companies - by insisting on chasing the reader down and holding our eyeballs open and showing us a constant stream of ads based on a phrase we used one time in a discussion board post somewhere - have actually decreased the variety and relevance of the ads we see. Because instead of it being an organic ecosystem where we see the ads we need when we naturally would want to see them, we now desperately wish to avoid seeing any ads, anywhere, at any time, under any circumstances. Even when they might actually be relevant - indeed, the targeted intrusiveness is often what we resent most, nowadays.

Microsoft’s Canada Timezone Troubles Leave Admins Fixing Calendars, Pretending They’re In Bogota

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Microsoft is scrambling to fix time-zone problems across Outlook, Power Automate, Fabric, SharePoint and other products after parts of Canada stopped observing seasonal clock changes on November 1. “The company has confirmed problems across a chunk of its software estate, leaving some customers facing incorrect times, broken schedules and a collection of workarounds while Redmond catches up,” reports The Register. From the report:
Outlook users have been left with the most homework. Switching to the new Canadian time zones won’t automatically update existing calendar entries, meaning that meetings scheduled after November 1 are potentially an hour out of whack. Microsoft advises users to change their Outlook calendar time zone, then update upcoming events and meetings to use it. For meetings involving other people, only the organizer can make the change.

Recurring meetings come with an additional treat: changing the time zone resets any previously moved occurrences, which then have to be recreated. Anyone with a calendar full of recurring meetings may wish to put the kettle on first. Microsoft is working on an Exchange Online PowerShell cmdlet to remediate non-recurring meetings, but according to its guidance, that’s not due until later this week. A fix for recurring meetings remains “in development,” with an ETA yet to be confirmed.

Things get stranger with Power Automate and Fabric, where Microsoft’s temporary fix involves pretending you’re somewhere else entirely. Depending on the product and province, that could mean Saskatchewan, Arizona or, for Manitobans, Bogota. Because apparently time zones weren’t confusing enough already. SharePoint On-Prem customers, meanwhile, have to wait until November 10 for the correct time zones to arrive, while Power Pages users could see server-formatted dates appear an hour out until a service fix lands. Microsoft’s current milestone for that is December 12.

Re:How did no one test this?

By ceoyoyo • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

From the summary it sounds like they did adjust the timezones but they didn’t anticipate that anyone would actually change timezones. That doesn’t particularly surprise me since Windows doesn’t even have a setting to keep the system clock in UTC.

As a Canuck .....

By DaveyJJ • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

I did love the recent headline in The Beaverton (our version of The Onion).

No one in Canada knows what time it is anywhere else in Canada

Re:Can’t we define the timezone as a UTC offset?

By Kernel Kurtz • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

Can’t we define the timezone as a UTC offset? I thought WIndows, macOS and Linux all allowed that?

On Linux in this case you can use the Etc/GMT+5 timezone (note the POSIX inversion is not a typo), which is a permanent UTC-5 with no DST changes.

Re:Those who cannot remember the past…

By acroyear • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

The ‘prior art’ is not y2k but rather the DST change in 2006 (to our current weekends in North America).

That was when they restructured most of their timezone information into easily updated files that made the operating system generally adapt pretty quickly, along with client-side software for anything *newly* generated in scheduling software.

However, the issues here are what to do about already-existing scheduled events - how do they adapt depends on what your internal model is for storing “where” they are (which timezone they’re meant to follow). If you didn’t separate out America/Vancouver in your system because it was always the same as America/Los_Angeles…it is an almost unfixable problem because you have no way to isolate what is and isn’t in “Canada”.

So this is why I’ve been saying, for months now since it was announced, that it was going to be a mess because there wasn’t enough time to develop and test the solutions in the middle of all of the other work that app teams are doing (often with reduced resources due to the layoffs of the last 3 years) before everything went live. You really want this stuff tested AT LEAST 6 months before the first change, preferably a full year.

I can’t imagine the scheduling disasters for anybody actually using Egypt time over the last 15 years, when they ditched DST, *partially* brought it back (the day would change based on Ramadan) and then in March of ‘23 announced that in April of ‘23 they would go back to switching. Pretty sure anybody of any import just set their clocks collectively to something from Europe for the stability.

Re:Can’t we define the timezone as a UTC offset?

By kqs • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread

I don’t really agree. Timezones, DST, and TZ definitions are very well understood. Every year several (mostly small) countries make last-minute TZ changes and they get pushed out and handled; this is not new and untested tech. Sure we need some level of QA; we always need more testing! but changing a TZ file has very few side effects. All internal time info is already stored at UTC, so the TZ changes how it is displayed but not how it is consumed or calculated. MS did not push out critical changes for a rather major country, despite having sufficient time and incentive. And the change was not difficult or fragile.

Marvell to Buy Lumentum In $115 Billion Bet On AI Connectivity

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Marvell has agreed to acquire optical components maker Lumentum in an all-stock deal with an implied enterprise value of $115 billion. “AI infrastructure is undergoing a fundamental architectural shift toward optical connectivity, creating an opportunity that comes along once in a generation,” said Marvell Chairman and CEO Matt Murphy. “The companies that move first and help define this transition will set the standard for decades to come.” CNBC reports:
Through the acquisition, Marvell said it can combine electrical and optical technologies to meet accelerating and shifting AI connectivity demands across regions and systems. Companies are increasingly relying on optical connections to piece together chips used to run and train large language models. Lumentum shareholders will receive 4.5 Marvell shares for each Lumentum share under the agreement. The deal is expected to close during the first half of 2028. Marvell’s takeover marks one of the most significant bets on AI in 2026 and comes despite recent concerns over the long-term sustainability of infrastructure spending.

Re: Surprise!

By drinkypoo • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

This is probably a good buy regardless. Interconnects have generally been going optical.

“Don’t build, buy”

By jacks smirking reven • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Once again a large existing player instead of building new tech and maybe even innovating and making some competition and playing in the market just throws it’s money around and buys it’s way in and now we have more consolidation and less competition and the market gets smaller. The losers here once again are the public at large.

Just stop companies from buying other companies, a full moratorium for a couple decades until we can figure out what the hell is going on. I don’t think there has a been a beneficial (to consumers and competitive markets) merger or acquisition in my lifetime.

Re:Big acquisitions did create the initial innovat

By jacks smirking reven • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread

That’s kind of exactly my point, I don’t think it’s healthy for our economy to have business startup and get venture capital on the sole idea of “lets just try and get bought by a larger company”. I think that outlook and the venture capital backing it up has led to a lot of negatives. Again I would ask which merger/acquisition has overall been beneficial and to whom and why?

If the idea and the people are good it should be able to get investment on it’s own right? It should be able to get into a self sustaining business right? Why couldn’t Lumentum just sign a fat licensing agreement with Marvell? The answer is because a buyout snuffs out any competitors from also using it.

why should you have any say in whether or not they can sell THEIR company?

If it wasn’t apparent for some reason I am talking on a law/policy level. The entire idea of a corporation and the fact they are allowed to buy eachother is built in law and statute. It’s not in nature, it’s not even in The Constitution. The entire ability to be an S-Corp or a C-Corp or an LLC is due to the fact that we created those things and allow that in our laws so therefore we are allowed to change those laws.

Supermarket Freezers Across Europe Hit By Second Suspected Cyberattack

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Guardian:
Supermarket chains in Sweden, Belgium and Luxembourg have said the temperatures of their refrigerators and freezers in dozens of stores rose overnight, prompting fears of a cyber-attack similar to one that caused millions of euros of food losses in France. Sweden’s Coop chain told the daily Aftonbladet on Monday that six of its stores had been affected, while ICA said it was “aware that a limited number of stores were affected by an incident overnight which impacted their refrigeration and freezer systems”.

The Dutch retailer Ahold Delhaize, which last month reported a cybersecurity incident to police in the Netherlands, said an “IT incident” had hit fridges and freezers in dozens of its supermarkets in Belgium and Luxembourg. A company spokesperson, Sarah De Meester, said the supermarket chain had established that temperatures in the cooling systems had increased, adding that the incident was being investigated. Belgium’s Le Soir newspaper reported that dozens of stores and supermarkets were affected, including five Spar outlets, multiple Shop & Go convenience stores attached to Q8 service stations, and a number of smaller Proxy Delhaize minimarkets.
“We started mobilizing technicians at 1am,” Stephan Moelans, the chief executive of Sabcobel, which specialises in refrigeration system installations, told the paper. “We spent all night and morning disconnecting the affected installations from the grid.”

Cyberfreezers

By TwistedGreen • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

The temperatures of these freezers need to have a centralised audit trail, to comply with foodchain regulations.

Sometimes you have to do something silly just because the insurance companies demand an audit trail. As usual, accountants are to blame.

Re: Cyberfreezers

By paul_engr • • Score: 5 • Thread
But an audit trail could and should be read only why can one manipulate the settings via the same route? Oh yeah, it’s because the world is awful at security and common sense

This is just AI doing it’s thing.

By Fly Swatter • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread
Someone secretly put AI in charge of the system and told it to reduce costs. Since AI doesn’t consume food it inferred that humans don’t need food either.

Re:Beyond stupid

By MIPSPro • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
Golf courses, MBAs, hot sales girls, lobotomies, corporate conformity, frat boys with no brain cells, lots of reasons....

Re:So dumb

By Big Bipper • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
What is really dumb is the idea that a device designed to always keep its contents at a specific temperature would ever need to have that temperature changed remotely. Set it once for wherever it’s location and contents require and it never has to change. Maybe have an on/off switch if it’s used seasonally, but why, for instance, does ice cream have to be kept at one temperature today and a different one next week ?

Itch Is Being Flooded By AI-Generated Garbage

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
The number of game pages being created per-day on Itch has doubled, the indie games site announced Saturday on Bluesky. When asked why, they responded: “take a guess.”

As the gaming news site Aftermath puts it, “the surge has been almost entirely down to AI-created garbage racing onto the platform as the popularity of vibe-coded theft, copycats and machine-built slop explodes.”
Back in 2024, when the spectre of AI-‘created’ video games was still in its infancy, indie platform itch.io decided that the best it could do to combat this growing threat was, like Valve has done with Steam, institute a voluntary ‘AI’ filter when adding new projects to the site. By November 2026, as itch buckles under the weight of new AI-generated ‘games’ pouring onto the site, that filter is proving about as robust as a wet paper bag.... Shopfronts are being deluged by this shit, and it’s making it a terrible user experience for customers.

And while in Valve’s case there’s a compelling case for stronger human moderation of the store, I’m not sure that’s a viable option for a relatively tiny, community-run platform like itch… [A]t time of writing I visited the latest releases section and there was still a huge number of clearly AI-generated titles (or titles making extensive use of AI in their visual assets) which made no use of itch’s voluntary tag system.

The issue here isn’t that these games are making money—itch themselves say in a reply that while the number of projects listed has doubled, “the number of downloads and purchases has not"—it’s that an inability to combat this surge makes the site worse for every single person using it. It gets harder to find real games, for example, and it also makes the shopfront look like a clearance rack.

Gatekeeping

By sourcerror • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

The whole schtick of Itch.io was that it had less gatekeeping than Steam, so if Steam has an issue with the flood of AI slop, Itch has an even bigger issue.

Re:Gatekeeping

By AmiMoJo • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

It’s more of a quality issue. An AI generated game could be good, it’s just that because the barrier to entry is so low now, literally just type a prompt and then complain about the things that don’t work right, that people with lame ideas and copycats are not dissuaded by the effort required.

You can’t put it back in a bottle.

By FictionPimp • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Software development as we know it is ending. AI tools are ‘good enough’ that any idea can be made fairly quickly with even limited knowledge. This opens up a lot of opportunities for creativity and itch scratching while at the same time impacting the commercial value of software. I’m shocked the open source community doesn’t see this as a pivital moment for free software.

For example, recently I wanted to play nethack on my m1 mac. I also wanted to use a tileset. Finding no good OSX arm based clients, I spun one up in a week with a custom tileset that I tweaked to my likings and even added graphical features to represent the true ‘size’ of items and creatures in the game.

Now I’m fully capable of building that solution by hand, it would have taken a month or two, but I would have needed to find a like minded person who knows how to build graphics and shared the same visual inspirations and goals I had. That would have probably just caused me to end the idea. Instead I scratched that itch and have been playing nethack a ton more and I’m happy. I released the code as open source so anyone who cares to can play with it.

To me that is real value and not ‘slop’.

I’m not so sure

By rsilvergun • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread
Right now we’ve had AI generated games for at least a year maybe longer. And so far the only ones that could be considered at all okay all the ones that are just ripping off a game that somebody made.

I don’t think you can make a good game with AI. The guys who made super meat boy spent months manually tweaking the gameplay mechanics to make it feel good.

Human beings are just too analog and complex. You are not going to be able to tell a computer to make something fun and it’s going to do it. Now what you can’t do is point a computer at something that is already fun and it can copy it but that’s just going to be a pale imitation.

It’s like all this Sonic the hedgehog rip off games from the ‘90s. They were all pretty terrible. The best AI can do is make Bubsy.

Re:I’m not so sure

By FictionPimp • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Using AI is a wide spectrum.

You can easily use AI to make great video games, just like you can use AI to write any other software. Just like you can use intellisense for code completion and still make great video games.

The thing that determines if a product is great is the people involved in the process who understand the business case, the expected work product, and the spirit of the goal. So I’m 100% for a game company using AI to help it write code and create the building blocks of a game. Like any product code needs reviews, graphics need tweaked, the software needs to be tested and product tested.

So yes, if you one shot a game with AI and do no testing or tweaking it’s going to be shit. If you use it appropriately like any other tool you can accelerate your deliverable and make fine products.

I think we will see some games crafted with love that leveraged AI for the parts that are less interesting. For example someone with talent in graphic design and writing who has a wonderful idea for a turn based RPG, but isn’t sure how to make Unity work leverages AI to turn that story and art into something fun. It would be great if everyone could find people who believed in their ideas and worked with them, but often all you find are people who tell you nothing will work. Sometimes you have to go it alone and AI is making that easier.

Bad Flock Info Leads Police To Tow Wrong Car, Then Towing Company Totals It

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot
“Police continue to blindly trust Flock cameras above and beyond the evidence in front of their own eyes,” reports Jalopnik.com.

“After incorrectly connecting Rosalyn Crump’s car to a shooting that had occurred the previous day, police had her car towed and impounded as evidence, reports Moneywise…”
According to WWBT 12 On Your Side, Richmond, Virginia, police didn’t have a license plate number for the suspect’s car, making it impossible to search Flock’s records for that plate. Flock cameras collect more than just license plate information, so police searched for a make, model, color, and approximate model year. Based on this extremely vague description, police zeroed in on Crump’s 2012 Hyundai Elantra. Around 2 a.m. they started looking through the windows with flashlights to see what was in plain sight, which isn’t technically a “search” — at least, not one that would require a warrant… [Crump was asleep, but left her home to speak to the police officers to tell them they had the wrong car. But they didn’t believe her.]

Other body cam footage shows an officer expressing doubt that Crump’s car is the right one, since child seats and other items inside seem inconsistent with a shooting. Another officer replies, “Don’t be surprised if they would have set that up like that.” Instead of believing the evidence, or Crump, or interviewing witnesses who could have corroborated her story, police called Seibert’s Towing to impound the car…

[Later] Police identified a similar-looking car that seemed to be actually connected to the shooting, and released Crump’s Elantra. Nobody actually told Crump this until four days later. Seibert’s told Moneywise that police didn’t actually release the car until then. Either way, they didn’t tell her that Seibert’s had ripped the front bumper off during the towing process — leaving the car undrivable — until she arrived to pick it up. Seibert’s took responsibility for causing the cosmetic damage, and was willing to cover the $2,212.30 bill to paint and replace the bumper cover, fog lights, and wheel liners. Then Crump asked for a full mechanical inspection, which revealed damaged tie rods and ball joints, jacking the bill beyond $6,000. Seibert’s says it didn’t cause this damage. Regardless of how it occurred, Seibert’s insurer and Crump agree that her Hyundai is now a total loss due to the cost of the repairs it needs. It had been drivable, if mechanically worn, before police ordered it towed, damaging it for nothing more than a case of mistaken identity.
The president of Seibert’s towing told Moneywise that while they’d originally offered $2,200 to repair the bumper damage, Crump must now negotiate with their insurance company. Crump has now resorted to a GoFundMe campaign to attempt to raise $17,100 for rental car expenses, a new car, and the expenses of moving to a different neighborhood. 130 donors have already contributed $7,431.

Reached for comment, the Richmond Police Department told local newscasters they “understand that Ms. Crump did not ask to become part of this investigation,” and that they recognize the “frustration of having a vehicle towed and subsequently damaged.” But they also said they were following a “credible” lead, which is their responsibility. The department “appreciates Ms. Crump’s cooperation” (and “sincerely hopes the remaining concerns about her vehicle can be resolved.”)

The city of Richmond has “already started backing away from Flock before Crump’s story aired,” reports Moneywise. “Mayor Danny Avula has decided not to renew Richmond’s license plate reader deal with Flock, which ends June 30, 2027. As of September, the city had 99 Flock readers on its streets.”

They note that the Institute for Justice, a public interest law firm in Arlington, Virginia, “has tallied at least 27 cases since 2018” of similar police errors. “In each case, a license plate reader mistake led police to stop, jail or point guns at drivers who’d done nothing wrong. More than half came in 2023 or later.”

Re:Sigh

By ArchieBunker • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

No, they’re stupid. https://abcnews.com/US/court-o…

The establishment wants a hammer to use against the populace. Police are the hammer.

Re:Sigh

By ArchieBunker • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

Judge clarifies it was rape. https://www.theguardian.com/us…

Re: Sigh

By fluffernutter • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
There could be a picture of Trump with Epstein’s dick in his mouth, his supporters would still claim association isn’t the same as guilt.

Re:Well… there’s a lot wrong here

By CubicleZombie • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

How do you not know how to tow a car without totalling it?

They were most likely using a sling wrecker. That’s the type with a tow bar and those wide strips that hang down from the boom - kind of what you think of when you imagine a tow truck. Those are relics from the 70’s when cars had huge chrome bumpers and solid frames.

Today they (should) use a wheel lift. That’s the type with the bar that goes under the car and lifts from the tires.

I worked at a towing shop in Richmond in the 90’s when I was in college there (not Seiberts, but I remember them). It was the sketchiest shop in the city, we only had sling wreckers, and our quality of drivers reflected that we were the only shop in town that didn’t drug test. Half of my job was fixing the damage that the drivers did when towing illegally parked cars. They’d hook the steering tie rods, bending them, and then winch it up with the sling and rip the bumper cover off.

Nothing here is newsworthy except that it started from a Flock camera.

Re: Well… there’s a lot wrong here

By drinkypoo • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

No they absolutely are not. First, they chose to take the contract with the police. Second, they chose to employ an incompetent. The driver should have determined it unsafe to tow with his equipment.