Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Vehicle Tire Pressure Sensors Enable Silent Tracking
  2. Emails To Outlook.com Rejected By Faulty Or Overzealous Blocking Rules
  3. TikTok Says End-To-End Encryption Makes Users Less Safe
  4. Apple Announces Low-Cost ‘MacBook Neo’ With A18 Pro Chip
  5. Intel’s Make-Or-Break 18A Process Node Debuts For Data Center With 288-Core Xeon 6+ CPU
  6. New App Alerts You If Someone Nearby Is Wearing Smart Glasses
  7. Qualcomm CEO: ‘Resistance Is Futile’ As 6G Mobile Revolution Approaches
  8. ChatGPT Gets GPT-5.3 Instant Update With Less ‘Cringe,’ Fewer Hallucinations
  9. ‘Game of Thrones’ Movie In the Works
  10. NASA Repairs Artemis 2 Rocket, Continues Eyeing April Moon Launch
  11. A Possible US Government iPhone-Hacking Toolkit Is Now In the Hands of Foreign Spies, Criminals
  12. OpenAI Is Developing an Alternative To GitHub
  13. Google Chrome Is Switching To a Two-Week Release Cycle
  14. LibreOffice Says Its UI Is Way Better Than Microsoft Office’s
  15. Meta’s AI Display Glasses Reportedly Share Intimate Videos With Human Moderators

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Vehicle Tire Pressure Sensors Enable Silent Tracking

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Longtime Slashdot reader linuxwrangler writes:
Dark Reading reports that a team of researchers has determined that signals from tire pressure monitoring systems (TPMSs), required in U.S. cars since 2007, can be used to track the presence, type, weight, and driving pattern of vehicles. The researchers report (PDF) that the TPMS data, which includes unique sensor IDs, is sent in clear text without authentication and can be intercepted 40-50 meters from a vehicle using devices costing $100.
“Researchers have discovered that most TPMS sensors transmit a unique identifier in clear text that never changes during the lifetime of the tire,” the researchers pointed out. “This unencrypted wireless communication makes the signals susceptible to eavesdropping and potential tracking by any third party in proximity to the car.”

Interesting, but not much of a threat

By tphb • Score: 3 Thread

It is an interesting paper and it is clever. But the threat of someone knowing my vehicle tire pressure (and thereby inferring weight) etc. is not something I’d worry about. After all, one could discretely check the tire pressure of my parked car without me knowing. And from the tread pattern, could tell a lot about driving habits. And if they wanted to track my vehicle around town, they can look at the license plate.

In other words, this can already be easily ascertained. But still cool paper. I don’t think auto manufacturers will be moving to encrypted tire sensors anytime soon.

Emails To Outlook.com Rejected By Faulty Or Overzealous Blocking Rules

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Microsoft spent much of the past week rejecting legitimate emails sent to Outlook.com, Live, and Hotmail accounts due to what appears to be overly aggressive IP reputation filtering or faulty blocklist rules. According to The Register, many senders received 550 errors claiming their networks were blocked, preventing delivery of invoices, notifications, and authentication emails. From the report:
A block list is a good thing. It helps stem the flow of spam from networks or addresses associated with junk email. However, the confusing thing for our reader is that his company was not on Microsoft’s naughty step for email. A look at Microsoft’s Smart Network Data Service (SNDS) showed no issues with the IP. “We’re also a member of their JMRP (Junk Mail Reporting Program),” our reader added, “which is intended to inform us when people are reporting spam sent from our IPs - except, we never get any reports.”

The problem worsened in February. On Microsoft’s support forums, users began to complain about similar issues as the IP net presumably widened. One wrote: “We are currently experiencing a critical and recurring email delivery issue affecting recipients at outlook.com, live.com, hotmail.com, and msn.com,” and provided a copy of an error that suggested the mail server has been “temporarily rate limited due to IP reputation.” The user drily noted, “Although the error indicates rate limiting, in practice no emails are being delivered.”

A large number of users, ranging from the administrator of a server sending automated notifications on behalf of Estonian Public Libraries to an email provider for healthcare professionals, chimed in to confirm they too were having delivery problems and Microsoft support was not helpful. […] Unsurprisingly, our reader spoke on condition of anonymity - nobody wants to be the ISP that has to say, “Yeah, we can deliver your email anywhere but Outlook.com” to customers. We asked Microsoft to comment, but other than acknowledging our questions, the company did not respond further.

Let me guess . . .

By UnknowingFool • Score: 4, Funny Thread
Microsoft entrusted their Outlook settings to Copilot

What actually happened?

By Murdoch5 • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
First let’s acknowledge this hilarious statement: “chimed in to confirm they too were having delivery problems and Microsoft support was not helpful”, Microsoft support is useless.

On a serious note, what could they have actually screwed up? Anyone who has administrated an email server, knows all too well, the massive headaches that filtering services cause, that DNS errors cause, that configuration issue causes, and so on. Administering email is a truly terrible, annoying, difficult, rage inducing cluster bleep.

At one company, ~10 years ago, out of nowhere, all our emails to any Yahoo address, went to spam. Our IP reputation was excellent, we had no black marks, weren’t on any black lists, and the DNS was correctly configured. The issue ended up being the SPF record in the DNS, and it wasn’t wrong, Yahoo just decided, out of nowhere, to reject reading it properly. The fight I had with Yahoo over that issue, lasted weeks, and they kept doubling down that my DNS configuration was wrong. Finally, after reaching who I have to assume was a 70-year-old grey beard, Unix master, he had us email him, and confirmed the parsing engine was configured incorrectly on their side. In 99.99X% of cases it didn’t matter, but, we had a secure SPF configuration and the parser tripped up reading it, forcing all our emails to spam.

I’m actually interested to know exactly what went wrong here. It is probably the dumbest possible reason, and out of Microsoft’s hands, even at their scale. Email is such a broken global system, that it is remarkable it works at all, and it really doesn’t, it’s just failing correctly most of the time.

TikTok Says End-To-End Encryption Makes Users Less Safe

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from the BBC:
TikTok will not introduce end-to-end encryption (E2EE) — the controversial privacy feature used by nearly all its rivals — arguing it makes users less safe. E2EE means only the sender and recipient of a direct message can view its contents, making it the most secure form of communication available to the general public. Platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, Messenger and X have embraced it because they say their priority is maximizing user privacy.

But critics have said E2EE makes it harder to stop harmful content spreading online, because it means tech firms and law enforcement have no way of viewing any material sent in direct messages. The situation is made more complex because TikTok has long faced accusations that ties to the Chinese state may put users’ data at risk. TikTok has consistently denied this, but earlier this year the social media firm’s US operations were separated from its global business on the orders of US lawmakers.

TikTok told the BBC it believed end-to-end encryption prevented police and safety teams from being able to read direct messages if they needed to. It confirmed its approach to the BBC in a briefing about security at its London office, saying it wanted to protect users, especially young people from harm. It described this stance as a deliberate decision to set itself apart from rivals.
“Grooming and harassment risks are very real in DMs [direct messages] so TikTok now can credibly argue that it’s prioritizing ‘proactive safety’ over ‘privacy absolutism’ which is a pretty powerful soundbite,” said social media industry analyst Matt Navarra. But Navarra said the move also “puts TikTok out of step with global privacy expectations” and might reinforce wariness for some about its ownership.

Re:Uh

By anoncoward69 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
This just tells you that TikTok doesn’t want to be involved in the surveillance. They want to make it easy for their overlords the US and Chinese govt to just sniff the traffic off the wire.

As designed

By Bu11etmagnet • Score: 3 Thread

TikTok told the BBC it believed end-to-end encryption prevented police and safety teams from being able to read direct messages

I see this as an absolute win.

Seatbelts make you less safe too

By JoeyRox • Score: 3 Thread
Because they keep you in a burning car instead of ejecting you out the front windshield away from the fire.

Let’s remember WHY TikTok was sold

By oumuamua • Score: 3, Informative Thread
Images from Gaza causing protests on US campuses: Palestine was the problem with TikTok https://www.theverge.com/featu… Could that really be the reason it was sold?

Award-winning Palestinian journalist Bisan Owda has said she has been permanently banned from TikTok, days after the social media platform was acquired by new investors in the United States.

https://www.aljazeera.com/news…
So we can conclude this current change is to facilitate policing things and users they don’t like on the app.

Propaganda

By CAIMLAS • Score: 3 Thread

This is a propaganda agitprop hit piece. There’s no truth in it of meaning.

No, Tiktok is (by self admission) not using end-to-end encryption. Guess what, though? Neither does Facebook, Instagram, or X, for that matter. This is provable by simply observing how ads track the private conversations you’re having.

There are confirmed cases now on X of users who’re having private conversations negative to Israel suddenly having Google Trends results for their real (verified) names from Tel Aviv. People regularly get ads related to chat conversations on Facebook and Instagram.

These platforms are all designed from the onset as a panopticon. Don’t kid yourself.

Apple Announces Low-Cost ‘MacBook Neo’ With A18 Pro Chip

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Continuing its product launches this week, Apple today announced the “MacBook Neo,” an all-new, low-cost Mac featuring the A18 Pro chip. It starts at $599 and begins shipping on Wednesday, March 11. MacRumors reports:
The MacBook Neo is the first Mac to be powered by an iPhone chip; the A18 Pro debuted in 2024’s iPhone 16 Pro models. Apple says it is up to 50% faster for everyday tasks than the bestselling PC with the latest shipping Intel Core Ultra 5, up to 3x faster for on-device AI workloads, and up to 2x faster for tasks like photo editing. The MacBook Neo features a 13-inch Liquid Retina display with a 2408-by-1506 resolution, 500 nits of brightness, and an anti-reflective coating. The display does not have a notch, instead featuring uniform, iPad-style bezels.

It is available in Silver, Indigo, Blush, and Citrus color options. The colored finishes extend to the Magic Keyboard in lighter shades and come with matching wallpapers. It weighs 2.7 pounds. There are two USB-C ports. One is a USB-C 2 port with support for speeds up to 480 Mb/s and one is a USB-C 3 port with support for speeds up to 10 Gb/s. There is also a headphone jack. The MacBook Neo also offers a 16-hour battery life, 8GB of unified memory, Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 6 connectivity, a 1080p front-facing camera, dual mics with directional beamforming, and dual side-firing speakers with Spatial Audio.

Wallpapers

By TwistedGreen • Score: 4, Funny Thread

I’m so glad it comes with matching wallpapers, that would’ve been a deal breaker for me.

OS is ommited

By bazorg • Score: 3 Thread

So odd that the product page on the Apple website doesn’t say whether it runs OS X or IOS.
If people don’t care, they might as well try shipping it running Linux…

Re:Charging extra for security?

By Moridineas • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Or, perhaps Apple wants to push back against Chrome books in education, and touch ID/biometrics can be dicey with PSUs (public school units in this context) in the US.

Re:An affordable Macbook?

By EvilSS • Score: 4, Informative Thread
It should be around the same or slightly better performance as the M1, which still holds up very well. Better single core performance, but only 6 cores (2p 4e) vs 8 (4p 4e) in the M1.

Re:An affordable Macbook?

By sabbede • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
Hah! Well, yeah, that’s a fair point about every CPU, right?

Intel’s Make-Or-Break 18A Process Node Debuts For Data Center With 288-Core Xeon 6+ CPU

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Intel has formally unveiled its Xeon 6+ "Clearwater Forest" data-center processor with up to 288 cores, built on the company’s new Intel 18A process and using Foveros Direct packaging. The chip targets telecom, cloud, and edge-AI workloads with massive parallelism, large caches, and high-bandwidth DDR5-8000 memory. Tom’s Hardware reports:
Intel’s Xeon 6+ processors with up to 288 cores combine 12 compute chiplets containing 24 energy-efficient Darkmont cores per tile that are produced using 18A manufacturing technology, two I/O tiles made on Intel 7 production node, as well as three active base tiles made on Intel 3 fabrication process. The compute tiles are stacked on top of the base dies using Intel’s Foveros Direct 3D technology, whereas lateral connections are enabled by Intel’s EMIB bridges.

Intel’s ‘Darkmont’ efficiency cores have received rather meaningful microarchitectural upgrades. Each core integrates a 64 KB L1 instruction cache, a broader fetch and decode pipeline, and a deeper out-of-order engine capable of tracking more in-flight operations. The number of execution ports has also been increased in a bid to improve both scalar and vector throughput under heavily threaded server workloads.

From a cache hierarchy standpoint, the design groups cores into four-core blocks that share approximately 4 MB of L2 cache per block. As a result, the aggregate last-level cache across the full package surpasses 1 GB, roughly 1,152 MB in total. This unusually large pool is intended to keep data close to hundreds of active cores and reduce dependence on external memory bandwidth, which in turn is meant to both increase performance and lower power consumption. Platform-wise, the processor remains drop-in compatible with the current Xeon server socket, so the CPU has 12 memory channels that support DDR5-8000, 96 PCIe 5.0 lanes with 64 lanes supporting CXL 2.0.

Not for you

By Tailhook • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

As big as these devices are, they’re essentially embedded CPUs. They’re intended for baseband signal processing in cellular networks. They live just behind the O-RAN layer (cellular transceivers that do the RF your devices see,) and process the baseband signal with FFT hardware offload (Intel VRAN Boost.) Hybrid SDR, essentially. After baseband processing and error correction, the signals are authenticated, metered, etc. A large number of low power X86 cores then run all the proprietary operator code for the network.

The customers for these are well-heeled wireless network operators, and they don’t care about prevailing prices for 1-2TB of the DDR5-8000 they need to feed each core 2-4GB of high performance RAM: the cost is a fraction of what they pay for the RF transceiver hardware and everything else it takes to operate a wireless network. So they’re paying full retail fresh out of the foundry, and Intel’s massive investments in new nodes and incredibly sophisticated integration (3 different nodes stacked in a 3D package…) pay off handsomely.

Unpaywalled write-up of some of the new tech

By sabbede • Score: 3 Thread
https://www.financialcontent.c…

It’s made of glass! Well, bits of it anyhow. And 1.8nm process. Pretty neat, right?

New App Alerts You If Someone Nearby Is Wearing Smart Glasses

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
A new Android app called Nearby Glasses alerts users when Bluetooth signals from smart glasses are detected nearby. The Android app, called Nearby Glasses, “launches at a time as there is an increasing resistance against always-recording or listening devices, which critics say process information about nearby people who do not give their consent,” reports TechCrunch. From the report:
Yves Jeanrenaud, who made the app, first spoke to 404 Media about the project and said he was in part inspired to make Nearby Glasses after reading the independent publication’s reporting into wearable surveillance devices, including how Meta’s Ray-Ban smart glasses have been used in immigration raids and to film and harass sex workers.

On the app’s project page, Jeanrenaud described smart glasses as an “intolerable intrusion, consent neglecting, horrible piece of tech.” Jeanrenaud told TechCrunch in an email that his motivation came from “witnessing the sheer scale and inhumane nature of the abuse these smart glasses are involved in.” Jeanrenaud also cited Meta’s decision to implement face recognition as a default feature in its smart glasses, “which I consider to be a huge floodgate pushed open for all kinds of privacy-invasive behavior.”

The app works by listening for nearby Bluetooth signals that contain a publicly assigned identifier unique to the Bluetooth device’s manufacturer. If the app detects a Bluetooth signal from a nearby hardware device made by Meta or Snap, the app will send the user an alert. (The app also allows users to add their own specific Bluetooth identifiers, allowing the user to detect a broader range of wearable surveillance gadgetry.)
Further reading: Meta’s AI Display Glasses Reportedly Share Intimate Videos With Human Moderators

Nevermind…

By CyberSnyder • Score: 3 Thread

…the five cameras in the corners recording everything. Just as long as a pair of Meta glasses aren’t recording you.

Advertising Product

By TwistedGreen • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

You have to wonder what Meta’s business plan is for products like these. They seem so ill-fitted to their company until you realize it always boils down to an advertising product.

So they want to offer an advertising product that can track everyone’s whereabouts in order to sell them more targeted ads?

How do they accomplish this? Install cameras everywhere? Nah, Amazon already did that with Ring, and they don’t get into more private spaces. That won’t fly. What if we could trick people into buying surveillance devices and wearing them on their heads? Then we can track people everywhere—in their homes, on public transit, in malls, schools, doctor’s offices, protests…

Re:Nevermind…

By Striek • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

The five cameras in the corner are very obviously cameras, and not hidden or disguised.

These “smart glasses”, on the other hand, or effectively covert cameras, disguised as regular glasses.

They are not the same.

Re:Nevermind…

By SirSlud • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

“Cameras are everywhere to point”

Vast oversimplification for the purpose of your argument. They’re not in my house. They’re not in the washrooms at work. They are not in a number of other places where people have an expectation of privacy. But if glasses are secret cameras now, that drastically changes the kinds of expectations I can have about those places where I can reasonably expect privacy. There’s also a different set of expectations as to the accountability and policies followed by those who have access to security cameras vs literally anybody. The potential for misuse and nefarious intention seems to go higher to me when we go from those who collect security footage and .. literally anybody. That security footage and its collection policies can be abused doesn’t mean it’s unreasonable to expect it’s less likely to be abused than whatever some rando is recording when they head into a washroom or my house or what have you.

If the argument is “well maybe there are secret cameras in all those places” … I mean, that’s just a dumb argument against objecting to the introduction of covert potential recording devices into those places. I can’t object to things I don’t know about, but I can object to something that I know about.

Qualcomm CEO: ‘Resistance Is Futile’ As 6G Mobile Revolution Approaches

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
At Mobile World Congress, Cristiano Amon of Qualcomm argued that the coming 6G networks will power an AI-driven “agent economy,” where devices and AI assistants constantly communicate across the network. “AI will fundamentally change our mobile experiences,” Qualcomm chief executive, Cristiano Amon says. “It’s going to change how we think about our smartphones. Think about our personal computing. Think about and interact with a car. The car is now a computing surface. If you actually believe in the AI revolution, 6G will be required. Resistance is futile.” The company says early consumer testing could begin around the 2028 Los Angeles Olympics, with broader rollouts expected by 2029. Fortune’s Kamal Ahmed reports:
Akash Palkhiwala is Qualcomm’s chief financial officer and chief operating officer. I spent some time with him at the company’s stand, as his leading engineers took me through a 6G future where individuals will have real-time information delivered to them via their glasses. Palkhiwala compliments me on my watch, which only does one thing. It tells me the time. “6G is going to be the first time that connectivity and AI come together in the network. What we’re building is the first AI-native wireless network that’s ever been built,” he explains.

“The traffic that we expect on 6G is way different than what we had before,” says Palkhiwala. “Before, it was all about consumer traffic. We expect 6G to be driven by [AI] agent traffic. Think about all these use cases where there are AI agents sitting on various devices — your glasses, your watch, your phone, your PC. These agents are going to be talking back and forth across the network to other agents and services. “The traffic completely changes. 6G is being built with this idea that the traffic that goes on the network is not just going to be consumer voice calls or downloading videos, we’re going to have agents talking to each other, so the reliability of the network becomes very important.”

On-device capabilities (the ability of your phone to process far more data); edge computing (locally sourced IT technology rather than distant data centers); more efficient use of available bandwidth (AI-enabled load control); and greater cloud access will all come together to produce a new wireless network. […] “Today we are in the application economy,” he notes. “On the phone, you want to make a travel reservation, you go to one application. You want to order an Uber, you go to a second application. You want to order food, you go to a third application, movie tickets, etc. The user has to go through that effort. In the future, you think of the app economy moving over to an agent economy, where there’s one agent I’m interacting with, and I can ask that agent to book me a movie ticket or a plane ticket, to order food for me, get an Uber for me. It knows everything about me.”

Riiight

By blastard • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

And all our cars are currently connected to each other in that glorious network we were promised would come with 5G.
I’ll believe it when I see it

Re:Riiight

By Junta • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Indeed, as of 5G they stopped just saying ‘faster and better’, now each turn of the crank they feel like they need some ‘narrative’ to rationalize faster and better.

With 5G the buzzword du jour was ‘Internet of Things’, and accordingly 5G was going to be needed because everything would have a cellular radio, and 5G was only really needed because of that, *maybe* a whiff of AR/VR too.

6G *of course* the buzzword is AI…

Resistance is futile?

By flippy • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
The Qualcomm chief executive might think that quoting Star Trek makes them sound cool and with it, but he may want to reconsider quoting the bad guys. He may also want to remember that ultimately, even in that fictional universe, the Borg were defeated.

I am Coffee of Borg

By jd • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Decaf is irrelevant. You will be percolated.

Seriously, AI is nothing like as significant as touted — and I do use AI a fair bit. It is not particularly robust or reliable, it generates large numbers of errors, it crashes frequently, it consumes vast resources, and the results are of dubious value. The code it generates is sloppy, it takes months to years of repeated cycles to do any but the most basic of engineering tasks, and in terms of cost efficiency, it costs rougly three orders of magnitude more to use AI than to use people of equivalent ability. AI is decent at pattern-matching, but only if you understand the problem space well enough - and most people are far too incompetent to do that.

6G is good, 6G is useful, but not for AI.

“It” can fuck right off

By Rosco P. Coltrane • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

It knows everything about me

You can shove your dystopian future where the sun don’t shine, is what I think.

ChatGPT Gets GPT-5.3 Instant Update With Less ‘Cringe,’ Fewer Hallucinations

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from MacRumors:
OpenAI today updated its most popular ChatGPT model, debuting GPT-5.3 Instant. GPT-5.3 Instant is supposed to provide more accurate answers and better contextualized results when searching the web. The update also cuts down on unnecessary dead ends, caveats, and overly declarative phrasing, plus it has fewer hallucinations.

According to OpenAI, it tweaked the Instant model to address complaints about tone, relevance, and conversational flow, which are issues that don’t show up in benchmarks. GPT-5.2 Instant had a “cringe” tone that could be overbearing or make unsubstantiated assumptions about user intent or emotions. The new model will have a more natural conversational style and will cut back on dramatic phrases like “Stop. Take a breath.”

Users found that GPT-5.2 Instant would refuse questions it should have been able to answer, or respond in ways that felt overly cautious around sensitive topics. GPT-5.3 Instant cuts down on refusals and tones down overly defensive or moralizing preambles when answering a question. The model will no longer “over-caveat” after assuming bad intent from the user. GPT-5.3 Instant also provides higher-quality answers based on information from the web. OpenAI says that it is able to better balance what it finds online with its own knowledge, so it is less likely to overindex on web results.

Re: The Gender of AI.

By ThurstonMoore • Score: 5, Informative Thread

So what you’re trying to say is you’ve never touched a vagina.

I don’t know …

By machineghost • Score: 3 Thread

I think helping the US government illegally surveil its own citizens is a hell of a lot *more* “cringe”.

‘Game of Thrones’ Movie In the Works

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Warner Bros. is developing a feature film set in the world of Game of Thrones with writer Beau Willimon of Andor and House of Cards. “That’s about all we know right now, and as with everything ‘Thrones’ things could change, but the film is firmly in development,” reports TheWrap. Page Six Hollywood was first to break the news and speculated that the story could revolve around Aegon I, the legendary Targaryen king who spawned a dynasty. From the report:
The Targaryens have been at the center of all things “Thrones” on HBO, with “Game of Thrones” following Daenerys Targaryen’s (Emilia Clarke) quest to usurp the throne, spinoff “House of the Dragon” set in the midst of the Targaryens’ reign and recent spinoff “A Knight of the Seven Kingdoms” following the squire-ship of Aegon “Egg” Targaryen towards the end of the family’s run atop the Iron Throne. All, of course, based on George R.R. Martin’s expansive book universe.

Movie

By Valgrus Thunderaxe • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
The monthly shows in the serial were ~56 minutes. So the movie is like 90 minutes so it’s probably not a big stretch of effort to produce this. Like the X-Files movies. It’s a TV episode and a half.

Which was shittier?

By quenda • Score: 3 Thread

The final season of “Game of Thrones”, or the final season of “House of Cards”?

Sad, since both were so good once.

“You may well ask that, but I couldn’t possibly comment.”

Re: Put a CHICK IN IT. Make it LAME and GAY

By zawarski • Score: 4, Funny Thread
This reminds of that old memorex commercial, “is it real or is it grok?”

NASA Repairs Artemis 2 Rocket, Continues Eyeing April Moon Launch

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
NASA is eyeing an April launch window for the upcoming Artemis II mission after it repaired a helium-flow issue on the Space Launch System upper stage rocket. “Work on the rocket and spacecraft will continue in the coming weeks as NASA prepares for rolling the rocket out to the launch pad again later this month ahead of a potential launch in April,” NASA wrote in an update on Tuesday. Space.com reports:
The repair work occurred inside the huge Vehicle Assembly Building (VAB) at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center (KSC) in Florida. Artemis 2’s SLS and Orion crew capsule have been in the VAB since Feb. 25, when they rolled back to the hangar from KSC’s Launch Pad 39B. Just a few days earlier, the Artemis 2 stack successfully completed a wet dress rehearsal, a two-day-long practice run of the procedures leading up to launch.

In the wake of that test, however, NASA noticed an interruption in helium flow in the SLS’ upper stage. That was a significant issue, because helium pressurizes the rocket’s propellant tanks. Rollback was the only option, as the affected area in the upper stage was not accessible at the pad. The problem took a potential March launch out of play for Artemis 2, which will send four astronauts on a roughly 10-day flight around the moon. It will be the first crewed flight to the lunar neighborhood since Apollo 17 in 1972.

The next Artemis 2 launch window opens in April, with liftoff opportunities on April 1, April 3-6 and April 30. And those options apparently remain in play, thanks to recent work in the VAB. That work centered on a seal in an interface through which helium flows from ground equipment into the SLS upper stage. That seal was obstructing the interface, which is known as a quick disconnect.

No April 20?

By Valgrus Thunderaxe • Score: 4, Funny Thread
Starship says “hold my bong”.

I hope it doesnt go wrong

By greytree • Score: 5, Funny Thread
I hope it doesn’t go disastrously wrong and they spend $4 billion dollars crashing the entire first two stages, including four $145 million (each) reusable shuttle engines into the sea.

Oh wait, they count that as a success.

Re: Huge it ain’t

By blastard • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Your perception in the moment may have been skewed by lack of details to measure scale by. Without the commonplace rows of windows and stories it doesn’t look that big. However, it is still the ninth largest building in the world by volume. 3.66 million cubic meters Was eighth only a couple years ago. Curse you Gigafactory.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…

A Possible US Government iPhone-Hacking Toolkit Is Now In the Hands of Foreign Spies, Criminals

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Security researchers say a highly sophisticated iPhone exploitation toolkit dubbed “Coruna,” which possibly originated from a U.S. government contractor, has spread from suspected Russian espionage operations to crypto-stealing criminal campaigns. Apple has patched the exploited vulnerabilities in newer iOS versions, but tens of thousands of devices may have already been compromised. An anonymous reader quotes an excerpt from Wired’s report:
Security researchers at Google on Tuesday released a report describing what they’re calling “Coruna,” a highly sophisticated iPhone hacking toolkit that includes five complete hacking techniques capable of bypassing all the defenses of an iPhone to silently install malware on a device when it visits a website containing the exploitation code. In total, Coruna takes advantage of 23 distinct vulnerabilities in iOS, a rare collection of hacking components that suggests it was created by a well-resourced, likely state-sponsored group of hackers.

In fact, Google traces components of Coruna to hacking techniques it spotted in use in February of last year and attributed to what it describes only as a “customer of a surveillance company.” Then, five months later, Google says a more complete version of Coruna reappeared in what appears to have been an espionage campaign carried out by a suspected Russian spy group, which hid the hacking code in a common visitor-counting component of Ukrainian websites. Finally, Google spotted Coruna in use yet again in what seems to have been a purely profit-focused hacking campaign, infecting Chinese-language crypto and gambling sites to deliver malware that steals victims cryptocurrency.

Conspicuously absent from Google’s report is any mention of who the original surveillance company “customer” that deployed Coruna may have been. But the mobile security company iVerify, which also analyzed a version of Coruna it obtained from one of the infected Chinese sites, suggests the code may well have started life as a hacking kit built for or purchased by the US government. Google and iVerify both note that Coruna contains multiple components previously used in a hacking operation known as “Triangulation” that was discovered targeting Russian cybersecurity firm Kaspersky in 2023, which the Russian government claimed was the work of the NSA. (The US government didn’t respond to Russia’s claim.)

Coruna’s code also appears to have been originally written by English-speaking coders, notes iVerify’s cofounder Rocky Cole. “It’s highly sophisticated, took millions of dollars to develop, and it bears the hallmarks of other modules that have been publicly attributed to the US government,” Cole tells WIRED. “This is the first example we’ve seen of very likely US government tools — based on what the code is telling us — spinning out of control and being used by both our adversaries and cybercriminal groups.” Regardless of Coruna’s origin, Google warns that a highly valuable and rare hacking toolkit appears to have traveled through a series of unlikely hands, and now exists in the wild where it could still be adopted — or adapted — by any hacker group seeking to target iPhone users.
“How this proliferation occurred is unclear, but suggests an active market for ‘second hand’ zero-day exploits,” Google’s report reads. “Beyond these identified exploits, multiple threat actors have now acquired advanced exploitation techniques that can be re-used and modified with newly identified vulnerabilities.”

Oops!

By OrangeTide • Score: 3 Thread

The good guys need these tools to stop the bad guys. But we never counted on the “good” guys being incompetent.

Don’t worry folks, we’ll solve the problems by adding even more surveillance to the state.

Re:Oops!

By Mr. Dollar Ton • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

There are no “good guys” in this business.

All this has been chewed on since forever, and from the point of general security the case has been settled decades ago.

if you find a bug and don’t report it, it will eventually come to bite you in the ass, in proportion with the popularity of the platform the bug is deployed on.

Nobody has ever demonstrated a case where hiding a bug on a popular platform to “catch the bad guys” has brought more good than bad.

But the powers that be cannot refrain from going the easier, more harmful way, because they bear no responsibility for the costs they inflict, even more so since certain “immunitay” and “pardon” decisions were made.

Congratulations and be ready for more.

OpenAI Is Developing an Alternative To GitHub

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
OpenAI is reportedly developing a code-hosting platform that could compete with GitHub, The Information reported on Tuesday. “If OpenAI does sell the product, it would mark a bold move by the creator of ChatGPT to compete directly against Microsoft, which holds a significant stake in the firm,” notes Reuters. From the report:
Engineers from OpenAI encountered a rise in service disruptions that rendered GitHub unavailable in recent months, which ultimately prompted the decision to develop the new product, the report said. The OpenAI project is in its early stages and likely will not be completed for months, according to The Information. Employees working on it have considered making the code repository available for purchase to OpenAI’s customer base.

Oh boy!

By dskoll • Score: 5, Informative Thread

What is this, 754th in a line of things nobody asked for and nobody wants? When there are already open-source replacements for GitHub out there anyway?

SlopHub

By Required Snark • Score: 5, Funny Thread
The obvious name.

Trust

By systemd-anonymousd • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Gee, why wouldn’t I trust Scam Altman with even more of my data?

Just ask ChatGPT what it should be called

By Gravis Zero • Score: 5, Funny Thread

I asked ChatGPT what to call a site with the following parameters:

* the content is AI slop code
* distributes content to a second and third-parties
* anyone dumb enough to it is going to get fucked

Top answer: Sloppy Seconds

I’d read well the TOS

By peppepz • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Who knows, these days; it might just happen that the code you push there ends up being used to train an AI that could fire you (if you’re American) or kill you (if you are from elsewhere). Not being evil is all good, but those sweet Pentagon contracts…

Google Chrome Is Switching To a Two-Week Release Cycle

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Google is accelerating Chrome’s major release cadence from four weeks to two starting with version 153 on September 8th. "…our goal is to ensure developers and users have immediate access to the latest performance improvements, fixes and new capabilities,” says Google. “Building on our history of adapting our release process to match the demands of a modern web, Chrome is moving to a two-week release cycle.” The company says the “smaller scope” of these releases “minimizes disruption and simplifies post-release debugging.” They also cite “recent process enhancements” that will “maintain [Chrome’s] high standards for stability.” 9to5Google reports:
There will still be weekly security updates between milestones. This applies to desktop, Android, and iOS, while there are “no changes to the Dev and the Canary channels”: “A Chrome Beta for each version will ship three weeks before the stable release. We recommend developers test with the beta to keep up to date with any upcoming changes that might impact your sites and applications.”

The eight-week Extended Stable release schedule for enterprise customers and Chromium embedders will not change. Chromebooks will also have “extended release options”: “Our priority is a seamless experience, so the latest Chrome releases will roll out to Chromebooks after dedicated platform testing. We are adapting these channels for the new two-week browser cycle and we will share more details soon regarding milestone updates for managed devices.”

Just make it once a day

By silvergig • Score: 3 Thread
Just make it once a day, or hey, every hour. That way, I can update Chrome between the gig of Win11 updates coming in.

Simplified Post-Release Debugging

By Khyber • Score: 3 Thread

AKA “We’re putting all the testing work on our users so we don’t have to do it”

Re:Just make it once a day

By fahrbot-bot • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Just make it once a day, or hey, every hour. …

For best results, set one of the Chrome flags:
"#new-version-for-each-tab”
"#new-version-for-each-link” (experimental)

The demands of a “modern” web?

By peppepz • Score: 3 Thread
What is this “modern” web that requires new features, not security updates, every two weeks? Because certainly it’s not users.
Nowadays the word “modern” has become a red flag for a company pushing their development or business models over their users’ needs or desires.

Re:Just make it once a day

By leonbev • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

From prior personal experience, I’d imagine that a good 20% of the “updates” are just new ways to break YouTube ad blocking.

Which is why I use Firefox now. Their priority seems to be user privacy, Google’s is improving quarterly ad revenue.

LibreOffice Says Its UI Is Way Better Than Microsoft Office’s

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
darwinmac writes:
While many users choose Microsoft Office over LibreOffice because of its support for the proprietary formats (.docx, .xlsx, and .pptx), others prefer Office for its “better” ribbon interface. These users often criticize LibreOffice for having a “clunky” UI instead of the “standard” ribbon interface you would find in Word, Excel, and other Office apps.

Now, Neowin reports that LibreOffice is fighting back, arguing that its UI is actually superior because it is customizable, with several modes such as the classic toolbar interface, an Office-inspired ribbon layout, a sidebar-focused design, and more. Furthermore, it argues that there is no evidence that the ribbon offers “superior usability” over other interface modes.
LibreOffice says in a blog post:
Incidentally, the characterization of ribbon-style interfaces as “modern” or “standard,” used by several users, is not based on any objective usability parameter or design principle, but is the result of Microsoft’s dominance in the market and the huge investments made when the ribbon was introduced in Office 2007 as a new paradigm for productivity software. The idea that “modern” equals “similar to a ribbon” is a normalization effect: the Microsoft interface has become a benchmark because of its ubiquity, not because of its proven advantages in terms of usability. Added to this is the fact that many users evaluate office software through the lens of familiarity with Microsoft Office and consider deviation from it as a problem rather than a design choice.
Before this, LibreOffice had also criticized its competitor OnlyOffice, accusing it of being "fake open source" because it believes OnlyOffice is working with Microsoft to lock users into the Office ecosystem by prioritizing the formats mentioned earlier instead of LibreOffice’s own OpenDocument Format (ODF).

^^^ Mod Parent UP

By SlashbotAgent • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

This is an extremely insightful, accurate, and level headed comment.

The most important problem that you pointed out with MS Office is

there was a discovery problem. Menus had grown from 5-or-fewer entries to nearly two dozen per menu, including the “tools” menu that was pretty much a catch-all for everything else. Toolbars had gotten so numerous that having all of them present left very little space for the actual document.

LibreOffice is at this same point right now. So many options that discoverability is like an Everest expedition.

I’ll just add that LO does have theming. Extensive theming. Lots more menues and appearance options. You just have to dig.

View -> User Interface
Tools -> Options -> LibreOffice -> View
Tools -> Options -> LibreOffice -> Appearance
and perhaps more.

Re:Context Matters

By mcswell • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Egypt gave up hieroglyphics after the mostly alphabetic Hieratic (and later Demotic) writing system came into use. Two millennia later, it took the Rosetta stone to decipher Egyptian hieroglyphics.
We grew up with an alphabetic writing system, why on earth would Microsoft want to replace that with indecipherable icons?

Re: Goodbye LibreOffice

By RazorSharp • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Collabora office is LibreOffice. The UI you want is two clicks away in regular LibreOffice, it just is not the default.

I hate the ribbon interface. It is extremely inefficient. Things are hidden, it requires multiple clicks to get to basic functions, and it takes up too much room.

The best word processor interface is to put the LibreOffice toolbars vertically to the side like how Adobe interfaces work (or ClarisWorks back in the day). It frees up the most vertical space, which is what you always need more of in a word processor, and you can quickly get to everything you need.

Re: Ribbon, No.

By devslash0 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Even worse. You learn something, and the ribbon changes with the the next update because Microsoft knows better.

This is especially destructive to older people, who didn’t grow up with computers, and for whom a button in w different place can mean a difference between feeling independent and completing a job themselves, or going into a complete breakdown of self-confidence.

Re:This just in…

By karmawarrior • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Pepsi does have studies to back it up, FWIW. As does LibreOffice.

And… on this… LibreOffice is objectively correct. Criticizing it for not using the Ribbon because it’s not “newer” ignores the fact that the Ribbon was clearly a step down and there’s not been any independent studies suggesting it’s easier to use or more productive than a traditional menu/toolbar combination.

And part of this is because it literally isn’t. While the latter is, actually, standard - that is, menus have a standard layout, meaning a user of Wordperfect was able to easily switch to Word back when that was a thing, Ribbons do not. There is nothing standard about the Ribbon. Microsoft’s entire point with the Ribbon was to break muscle memory and prevent users from being able to switch from one application to another at a time when it was worried about being slapped down again by anti-trust authorities. If LibreOffice had a ribbon it would not help users switch to it.

I’m tired of people who are actually doing it right being criticized by those who want “new and shiny!” and do not care whether the new stuff is actually better than the old stuff.

So right now, very happy LibreOffice is defending itself, and fuck the critics demanding it get a UI downgrade.

Meta’s AI Display Glasses Reportedly Share Intimate Videos With Human Moderators

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Engadget:
Users of Meta’s AI smart glasses in Europe may be unknowingly sharing intimate video and sensitive financial information with moderators outside of the bloc, according to a report from Sweden’s Svenska Dagbladet released last week. Employees in Kenya doing AI “annotation” told the journalists that they’ve seen people nude, using the toilet and engaging in sexual activity, along with credit card numbers and other sensitive information.

With Meta’s Ray-Ban Display and other glasses with AI capabilities, users can record what they’re looking at or get answers to questions via a Meta AI assistant. If a wearer wants to make use of that AI, though, they must agree to Meta’s terms of service that allow any data captured to be reviewed by humans. That’s because Meta’s large language models (LLMs) often require people to annotate visual data so that the AI can understand it and build its training models.

This data can end up in places like Nairobi, Kenya, often moderated by underpaid workers. Such actions are subject to Europe’s GDPR rules that require transparency about how personal data is processed, according to a data protection lawyer cited in the report. However, Svenska Dagbladet’s reporters said they needed to jump through some hoops to see Meta’s privacy policy for its wearable products. That policy states that either humans or automated systems may review sensitive data, and puts the onus on the user to not share sensitive information.

Re:Good!

By kerubi • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

If only the people who wear these glasses would only record themselves, and nobody else..

Re:Hold the phone!

By pete6677 • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Next thing you know, they’ll admit that Facebook mobile app listens in to people when they aren’t even using Facebook!

Re:Probably left unsaid…

By Local ID10T • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

What? It is prohibited to turn off your telescreen!

The telescreen received and transmitted simultaneously. Any sound that Winston made, above the level of a very low whisper, would be picked up by it, moreover, so long as he remained within the field of vision which the metal plaque commanded, he could be seen as well as heard. There was of course no way of knowing whether you were being watched at any given moment. How often, or on what system, the Thought Police plugged in on any individual wire was guesswork. It was even conceivable that they watched everybody all the time. But at any rate they could plug in your wire whenever they wanted to. You had to live—did live, from habit that became instinct—in the assumption that every sound you made was overheard, and, except in darkness, every movement scrutinized.

BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING YOU

Apple Vision Pro users have no concerns

By 93 Escort Wagon • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Because NO ONE is getting laid with one of those ridiculous things on their faces!

Re:Hold the phone!

By Tablizer • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Zuck will have to RE-stop moving fast and breaking things. Didn’t learn from the Cambridge Analytica lawsuit.

Send him to Camp Move Slow And Be Nice. They’ll force him to touch plants, smell flowers, and talk to real humans. (Let’s hope he doesn’t mix the verbs up.)