Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Planet Labs Tests AI-Powered Object Detection On Satellite
  2. Russian Government Hackers Broke Into Thousands of Home Routers To Steal Passwords
  3. Apple Faces ‘Massive Dilemma’ With Success of the MacBook Neo
  4. Anthropic Unveils ‘Claude Mythos’, Powerful AI With Major Cyber Implications
  5. Chrome Is Finally Getting Vertical Tabs
  6. Supreme Court Wipes Piracy Liability Verdict Against Grande Communications
  7. Testing Suggests Google’s AI Overviews Tells Millions of Lies Per Hour
  8. Anthropic Reveals $30 Billion Run Rate, Plans To Use 3.5GW of New Google AI Chips
  9. Cloudflare Fast-Tracks Post-Quantum Rollout To 2029
  10. New Revelations Reignite Crypto Scandal Involving Argentina’s President Milei
  11. Stanford Daily Ponders Fate of Bill Gates Namesake Building On April Fools’ Day
  12. LinkedIn Faces Spying Allegations Over Browser Extension Scanning
  13. China Flies World’s First Megawatt-Class Hydrogen Turboprop Engine
  14. New Jersey Cannot Regulate Kalshi’s Prediction Market, US Appeals Court Rules
  15. OpenAI Calls For Robot Taxes, Public Wealth Fund, and 4-Day Workweek To Tackle AI Disruption

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Planet Labs Tests AI-Powered Object Detection On Satellite

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
BrianFagioli writes:
Artificial intelligence has now run directly on a satellite in orbit. A spacecraft about 500km above Earth captured an image of an airport and then immediately ran an onboard AI model to detect airplanes in the photo. Instead of acting like a simple camera in space that sends raw data back to Earth for later analysis, the satellite performed the computation itself while still in orbit.

The system used an NVIDIA Jetson Orin module to run the object detection model moments after the image was taken. Traditionally, Earth observation satellites capture images and transmit large datasets to ground stations where computers process them hours later. Running AI directly on the satellite could reduce that delay dramatically, allowing spacecraft to analyze events like disasters, infrastructure changes, or aircraft activity almost immediately.
“This success is a glimpse into the future of what we call Planetary Intelligence at scale,” said Kiruthika Devaraj, VP of Avionics & Spacecraft Technology. “By running AI at the edge on the NVIDIA Jetson platform, we can help reduce the time between ‘seeing’ a change on Earth and a customer ‘acting’ on it, while simultaneously minimizing downlink latency and cost. This shift toward integrated AI at the edge is a technological leap that can help differentiate solutions like Planet’s Global Monitoring Service (GMS), providing valuable insights for our customers and enabling rapid response times when it matters most.”

Russian Government Hackers Broke Into Thousands of Home Routers To Steal Passwords

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from TechCrunch:
A group of Russian government hackers have hijacked thousands of home and small business routers around the world as part of an ongoing campaign aimed at redirecting victim’s internet traffic to steal their passwords and access tokens, security researchers and government authorities warned on Tuesday. […] The hacking group targeted unpatched routers made by MikroTik and TP-Link using previously disclosed vulnerabilities according to the U.K. government’s cybersecurity unit NCSC and Lumen’s research arm Black Lotus Labs, which released new details of the campaign Tuesday.

According to the researchers, the hackers were able to spy on large numbers of people over the course of several years by compromising their routers, many of which run outdated software, leaving them vulnerable to remote attacks without their owners’ knowledge. The NCSC said that these operations are “likely opportunistic in nature, with the actor casting a wide net to reach many potential victims, before narrowing in on targets of intelligence interest as the attack develops.” Per the researchers and government advisories, the Russian hackers hacked routers to modify the device’s settings so that the victim’s internet requests are surreptitiously passed to infrastructure run by the hackers. This allows the hackers to redirect victims to spoof websites under their control, then steal passwords and tokens that let the hackers log in to that victim’s online accounts without needing their two-factor authentication codes.

Black Lotus Labs said that Fancy Bear compromised at least 18,000 victims in around 120 countries, including government departments, law enforcement agencies, and email providers across North Africa, Central America, and Southeast Asia. Microsoft, which also released details of the campaign on Tuesday, said in a blog post that its researchers identified over 200 organizations and 5,000 consumer devices affected by these hacking operations, including at least three government organizations in Africa.
The Justice Department said Tuesday it neutralized compromised routers in the U.S. under court authorization. As the DOJ put it, the FBI “developed a series of commands to send to compromised routers” to collect evidence, reset settings, and prevent hackers from breaking back in.

Re:How did they get initial access to the routers?

By darkain • Score: 4, Informative Thread

that would require session tracking information on literally every single customer. and is also a direct violation of the basic ideals of “net neutrality”. these are why it is handled at the edge rather than by the trunk routers.

oh, and also, the internet as a whole is a-symmetrical in routing. the only way this is practical is on the edge, or MAYBE one hop up from an edge router (assuming there is no dynamic load balancing going on that you cannot see)

Apple Faces ‘Massive Dilemma’ With Success of the MacBook Neo

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Apple may have a supply problem on its hands with the MacBook Neo… The laptop reportedly relies on “binned” A18 Pro chips with one GPU core disabled, and demand is so strong that the supply of those cheaper leftover chips could run out before the next model is ready. That leaves Apple choosing between lower margins, shifting production plans, or changing the lineup to keep its $599 hit product in stock. MacRumors reports:
The all-new MacBook Neo has been such a hit that Apple is facing a “massive dilemma,” according to Taiwan-based tech columnist and former Bloomberg reporter Tim Culpan. […] In the latest edition of his Culpium newsletter today, Culpan said the MacBook Neo is selling so well that Apple’s supply of the binned A18 Pro chips with a 5-core GPU will “run out” before the company is able to fully satisfy demand for the laptop. Apple’s initial plan was to have suppliers build around five to six million MacBook Neo units before ceasing production of the model with the A18 Pro chip, he said, but it sounds like demand is so strong that Apple might run out of A18 Pro chips to put in the MacBook Neo before the second-generation MacBook Neo with an A19 Pro chip is ready next year. Apple is unlikely to mark the MacBook Neo as temporarily sold out, so it may be forced to take action, but profit margins might be affected.

A18 Pro chips are manufactured with TSMC’s second-generation 3nm process, known as N3E, and Culpan said TSMC’s N3E production lines are currently operating at maximum capacity. As a result, he said that Apple may have to pay a premium to restart A18 Pro chip production for the MacBook Neo, which would lower its profit margins. Apple would have to disable a GPU core on these chips to ensure that they have only a 5-core GPU, like all other MacBook Neo units sold to date. Alternatively, Culpan said that Apple could reallocate some of its chip production that was originally planned for other devices, but he said the cost would still be higher than what it paid for its initial batch of A18 Pro chips.

Culpan speculated that Apple could also opt to discontinue the $599 model with 256GB of storage, leaving the $699 model with 512GB of storage and a Touch ID button as the only configuration available. This is unlikely to happen any time soon, in our view, given how heavily Apple has been promoting the MacBook Neo’s affordability. Apple might also be able to move up the release of a MacBook Neo with the iPhone 17 Pro’s A19 Pro chip, but that too would be a costlier option, at least until the company achieves a sufficient stockpile of binned A19 Pro chips with a 5-core GPU. In any case, Apple could opt to keep the starting price of current and future MacBook Neo models at $599 and simply accept lower profit margins on the laptop, especially given that it attracts customers to the macOS and broader Apple ecosystem.

A hammer and a nail

By Tomahawk • Score: 3 Thread
(and good eyesight and a really steady hand) Sorted!

Built from leftover parts

By Local ID10T • Score: 3 Thread

Imagine the conversation in the boardroom:

"It’s nearly 100% profit. We built it out of leftover parts!"

"They are selling out -we need to make more."

"…shit. We are running out of leftover parts."

"Call it a ‘Limited Edition’ and double the price."

Sounds like a good problem to have

By karmawarrior • Score: 3 Thread

Apple has rarely dipped into the mass markets before now when it came to computers, the Mac mini being the rare exception, which was just a little too nerdy (needing your left over keyboard, mouse, and monitor) to actually be a mass market product. Maybe the success of their mass market non-computer stuff has helped them dip a toe in the waters.

In any case, I’m happy they’re trying it and having the right kinds of problems.

Re:Built from leftover parts

By Whateverthisis • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
Totally different business but exactly the same problem. Nordstrom generally has the latest trend clothes in fashion and pretty good quality; it’s known for it. But when it had leftover inventory it knew there were people a step down from their target demographic that would love Nordstrom’s quality products even if they’re a season or two out of fashion for cheaper, so they opened Nordstrom’s Rack to sell off the excess inventory.

Nordstrom’s Rack got so popular they couldn’t keep it stocked, and eventually started developing their own dedicated Nordstrom Rack brands, which sort of defeated the purpose of Nordstrom’s Rack as it’s entire value was Nordstrom’s quality, late season, at a discount, but now it’s discount quality with the Nordstrom’s name on it.

Law of unintended consequences I guess.

Anthropic Unveils ‘Claude Mythos’, Powerful AI With Major Cyber Implications

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
“Anthropic has unveiled Claude Mythos, a new AI model capable of discovering critical vulnerabilities at scale,” writes Slashdot reader wiredmikey. “It’s already powering Project Glasswing, a joint effort with major tech firms to secure critical software. But the same capabilities could also accelerate offensive cyber operations.” SecurityWeek reports:
Mythos is not an incremental improvement but a step change in performance over Anthropic’s current range of frontier models: Haiku (smallest), Sonnet (middle ground), and Opus (most powerful). Mythos sits in a fourth tier named Copybara, and Anthropic describes it as superior to any other existing AI frontier model. It incorporates the current trend in the use of AI: the modern use of agentic AI. “The powerful cyber capabilities of Claude Mythos Preview are a result of its strong agentic coding and reasoning skills… the model has the highest scores of any model yet developed on a variety of software coding tasks,” notes Anthropic in a blog titled Project Glasswing — Securing critical software for the AI era.

In the last few weeks, Mythos Preview has identified thousands of zero-day vulnerabilities with many classified as critical. Several are ten or 20 years old — the oldest found so far is a 27-years old bug in OpenBSD. Elsewhere, a 16-years old vulnerability found in video software has survived five million hits from other automated testing tools without ever being discovered. And it autonomously found and chained together several in the Linux kernel allowing an attacker to escalate from ordinary user access to complete control of the machine. […] Anthropic is concerned that Mythos’ capabilities could unleash cyberattacks too fast and too sophisticated for defenders to block. It hopes that Mythos can be used to improve cybersecurity generally before malicious actors can get access to it.

To this end, the firm has announced the next stage of this preparation as Project Glasswing, powered by Mythos Preview. Given the rate of AI progress, it will not be long before such capabilities proliferate, potentially beyond actors who are committed to deploying them safely. “Project Glasswing is a starting point. No one organization can solve these cybersecurity problems alone: frontier AI developers, other software companies, security researchers, open-source maintainers, and governments across the world all have essential roles to play.” Claude Mythos Preview is described as a general-purpose, unreleased frontier model from Anthropic that has nevertheless completed its training phase. The firm does not plan to make Mythos Preview generally available. The implication is that ‘Preview’ is a term used solely to describe the current state of Mythos and the market’s readiness to receive it, and will be dropped when the firm gets closer to general release.

sales pitch

By awwshit • Score: 3 Thread

The most serious sounding sales pitch. Here is how you know… “Anthropic is committing up to $100M in usage credits for Mythos Preview across these efforts, as well as $4M in direct donations to open-source security organizations.”

The sky is falling, we can help if you pay us.

Let me guess, “EVERYTHING HAS CHANGED”

By FlipperPA • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Here we go again.

“EVERYTHING HAS CHANGED.”

“Oh, that used to be true, but not anymore.”

“Hey, some CEO said a thing; let’s pretend it is absolute truth without any objectivity or skepticism!”

“Those old models I said were the most amazing thing ever last month are now worthless.”

“AGI is here!”

It is ALL SO DAMN EXHAUSTING.

Re: Anyone got examples

By Lothsahn • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
They have multiple documented patched zero days and provided sha3 verifiable hashes for ones that will be released in the next 135 days. Knowing Anthropic and their track record, it seems highly unlikely they’re lying. This is a game changer to the security community. In the long term it should be great, but in the short term it is going to surface hundreds of thousands of vulnerabilities.

YIKES! API Price

By EvilSS • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
Just saw the reported API pricing for those who are allowed access: $25/$125 per 1M tokens. To put that into perspective Opus 4.6 is $5/$25 per 1M tokens. Even Opus 4 was “only” $15/$75 per 1M. No way this one is coming to any plans. It will be enterprise only when they do open it up more.

Still cheaper than GPT Pro though ($30/$180)

Chrome Is Finally Getting Vertical Tabs

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Chrome is finally adding built-in vertical tabs, “which will move the tabs to the side of the browser window, making it easier to read full page titles and manage tab groups,” reports TechCrunch. The company is also introducing an immersive reading mode for a distraction-free, text-focused experience. From the report:
The company notes that the new vertical tabs can be enabled at any time by right-clicking on a Chrome window and selecting “Show Tabs Vertically.” The company says there’s no hard limit on the number of tabs that can be opened (beyond what would be limited already by the user’s hardware). The vertical tabs work just as the horizontal tabs do, meaning you can have different Chrome windows with their own set of tabs or tab groups.

[…] Alongside the launch of vertical tabs, Chrome is also rolling out a new Reading Mode experience, which will offer a full-page interface to make it even easier to reduce on-screen clutter to focus on the text. This will be the new default experience for Chrome users, and arrives at a time when web pages, particularly those on news sites, have become cluttered with ads and prompts to subscribe to newsletters.

As long as it’s just an option

By Powercntrl • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Personally, I’m not a fan. Tabs belong at the top, just like the real-world analog of folder tabs that you’d find in a file cabinet. But hey, I’m not gonna yuck your yum if you really want ‘em displayed in a list off to the side. You do you.

Chrome does it? Time to move on.

By nightflameauto • Score: 4, Funny Thread

Next? Diagonal tabs. They just plaster the tabs right across the browser window corner to corner. You can, however, choose which diagonal course it takes. Left lower to right upper, or left upper to right lower. True configurable innovation!

Re:Why?

By maladroit • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Why do these browser companies think anyone wants vertical tabs?

Because people, including me, have asked for it and use it.
https://forums.opera.com/topic…
https://www.theverge.com/tech/…
https://www.makeuseof.com/goog…

What workflow is broken by having a vertical tab option?

Re:Why core?

By maladroit • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

There are a bunch of vertical tab extensions:
https://chromewebstore.google....

Every time I’ve tried one, both in Firefox and Chrome, there’s been something clunky about it.

Many of them could not hide the horizontal bar well, so sometimes you had tabs at both the top and the bottom. Others had trouble integrating with UI elements at the top of the window. Often you had to set preferences deep in some config files.

Apparently tabs are deeply integrated into the browser code, and the extension hooks simply didn’t provide everything needed.

That same integration issue also means that tab extensions have have access to everything, and therefore create a security issue.

Re:“Finally”

By thegarbz • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

No need for the sarcasm. Enough people wanted this that multiple extensions exist for it.

Supreme Court Wipes Piracy Liability Verdict Against Grande Communications

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from TorrentFreak:
Following on the heels of the landmark Cox v. Sony ruling, the Supreme Court has vacated the contributory copyright infringement verdict against ISP Grande Communications, ordering the Fifth Circuit to reconsider its decision in light of the new precedent. […] The order (PDF) effectively removes the case from the Supreme Court docket, urging the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals to take another look at its decision in light of the new ruling.

Given the similarities between the two cases, it is no surprise that the Supreme Court came to this conclusion. It is now up to the Fifth Circuit to revisit whether Grande’s conduct meets the intent threshold that was established in Cox. That is a significantly higher bar than the one applied in the original verdict, which found that continuing to provide service to known infringers was enough to establish material contribution.

The music companies previously said they sent over a million copyright infringement notices, but that Grande failed to terminate even a single subscriber account in response. However, without proof of active inducement, these absolute numbers carry less weight now. Whether this translates into a win for Grande on remand remains to be seen. For now, however, the original $47 million verdict is further away than ever.

Anything that makes Music Companies Mad

By Dishevel • Score: 3, Insightful Thread
Anything that makes Music Companies Mad is 100% fine with me.
Screw labels.

Electric Company

By bill_mcgonigle • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Why not notify their electric company to cut their power to halt infringement?

Or their water company so the house is uninhabitable?

The Courts need to recognize that Internet has become a necessary utility and that the music companies need to deal with the individual directly through the Courts, not in a lazy clandestine way.

Grande seems based.

Re:Electric Company

By Powercntrl • Score: 5, Informative Thread

The Courts need to recognize that Internet has become a necessary utility and that the music companies need to deal with the individual directly through the Courts, not in a lazy clandestine way.

The record labels were originally suing individual users back in the Napster days and it was causing a bit bad PR for them.

I also can’t help but think that going after ISPs is something of a cash grab, since I really don’t know anyone who even bothers trying to pirate music anymore. It’s no longer worth the effort with how cheap music streaming services are.

Re:Electric Company

By markdavis • Score: 4, Informative Thread

>“I agree with the decision handed down.”

I do too

>“I do not agree with legislating from the bench. The courts need to apply the laws as written, not make up new laws. We have a branch of government for making new laws.”

The problem is that the laws are often not well written and too flexible, generic, undefined, or even contradictory. The other problem is when the legislature is too chicken s*** to make a stand on anything and do their jobs. Instead, they just shove all their responsibilities onto unelected agencies with nebulous, overly-broad mandates. That way the legislators can’t be held accountable for anything.

Testing Suggests Google’s AI Overviews Tells Millions of Lies Per Hour

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
A New York Times analysis found Google’s AI Overviews now answer questions correctly about 90% of the time, which might sound impressive until you realize that roughly 1 in 10 answers is wrong. "[F]or Google, that means hundreds of thousands of lies going out every minute of the day,” reports Ars Technica. From the report:
The Times conducted this analysis with the help of a startup called Oumi, which itself is deeply involved in developing AI models. The company used AI tools to probe AI Overviews with the SimpleQA evaluation, a common test to rank the factuality of generative models like Gemini. Released by OpenAI in 2024, SimpleQA is essentially a list of more than 4,000 questions with verifiable answers that can be fed into an AI.

Oumi began running its test last year when Gemini 2.5 was still the company’s best model. At the time, the benchmark showed an 85 percent accuracy rate. When the test was rerun following the Gemini 3 update, AI Overviews answered 91 percent of the questions correctly. If you extrapolate this miss rate out to all Google searches, AI Overviews is generating tens of millions of incorrect answers per day.

The report includes several examples of where AI Overviews went wrong. When asked for the date on which Bob Marley’s former home became a museum, AI Overviews cited three pages, two of which didn’t discuss the date at all. The final one, Wikipedia, listed two contradictory years, and AI Overviews confidently chose the wrong one. The benchmark also prompts models to produce the date on which Yo Yo Ma was inducted into the classical music hall of fame. While AI Overviews cited the organization’s website that listed Ma’s induction, it claimed there’s no such thing as the Classical Music Hall of Fame.
“This study has serious holes,” said Google spokesperson Ned Adriance. “It doesn’t reflect what people are actually searching on Google.” The search giant likes to use a test called SimpleQA Verified, which uses a smaller set of questions that have been more thoroughly vetted.

Great even the pol

By DarkOx • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Well shoot, even the politicians jobs are not safe then!

I don’t believe it

By TwistedGreen • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Alice laughed. “There’s no use trying,” she said. “One can’t believe impossible things.”

“I daresay you haven’t had much practice,” said Google. “Why, sometimes I’ve believed as many as six impossible things before breakfast.”

I use gemini

By MpVpRb • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

It often gives excellent answers, but when it doesn’t, the results are strange.
I asked for help writing code for an obscure hobby CNC control system.
It totally invented function calls and invented plausible documentation to explain how they worked and how to call them.
It totally missed the easy answer that involved calling an existing simple function and writing no new code.
If the answer doesn’t exist on the internet, it appears to just make one up

I don’t know about that

By rsilvergun • Score: 5, Funny Thread
I mean based on the president of the United states? Those are rookie numbers. Come on Google you can do better!

Re:So what you’re saying is…

By ranton • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Google has implemented Trump Mode in their AI?

No, they said Google tells the truth 90% of the time, not 10%.

Anthropic Reveals $30 Billion Run Rate, Plans To Use 3.5GW of New Google AI Chips

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Anthropic says its annualized revenue run rate has surpassed $30 billion and disclosed plans to secure roughly 3.5 gigawatts of next-generation Google TPU compute starting in 2027. Broadcom will supply the key chips and networking gear for the effort, the company announced. The Register reports:
News of the two deals emerged today in a Broadcom regulatory filing that opens with two items of news. One is a “Long Term Agreement for Broadcom to develop and supply custom Tensor Processing Units (“TPUs”) for Google’s future generations of TPUs.” Google and Broadcom have collaborated to produce custom TPUs. Broadcom CEO Hock Tan recently shared his opinion that hyperscalers don’t have the skill to create custom accelerators and predicted Broadcom’s chip business will therefore win over $100 billion of revenue from AI chips in 2027 alone.

Working on next-gen TPUs for Google will presumably help to make that prediction a reality. So will the second part of Broadcom’s announcement: a “Supply Assurance Agreement for Broadcom to supply networking and other components to be used in Google’s next-generation AI racks through up to 2031.” Broadcom’s filing also revealed one user of Google’s next-gen TPU will be Anthropic, which starting in 2027, “will access through Broadcom approximately 3.5 gigawatts as part of the multiple gigawatts of next generation TPU-based AI compute capacity committed by Anthropic.”

Wait…

By Locke2005 • Score: 5, Funny Thread
We’re measuring CPUs in gigawatts, not megabytes or operations per second now? Dudes, the goal isn’t to waste as much energy as possible! That’s the most disgusting dick size measuring contest ever!

Billionares Using Our Resources to Replace People

By BrendaEM • Score: 3 Thread
AI has brought nothing good to the world.

“Revenue run rate” ?

By greytree • Score: 3 Thread
What is this, News For Miserable Economists ?

“AI Overview
Revenue Run Rate
(RRR) is a financial metric that projects a company’s future annual revenue based on current, short-term performance (usually monthly or quarterly). It helps startups and rapidly growing companies estimate annual revenue by assuming current performance trends will remain consistent for a full year.”

Claude rules

By ZipNada • Score: 3 Thread

The Claude models are the best by far for coding assistance in my experience. Apparently a lot of other people think so too because Anthropic is getting swamped. They are having to ration out their compute resources and in some cases have raised their fees to 2-3 times more than the lesser competition charges. I’m finding that in order to keep costs down I’m having to use 2nd-tier models for simpler work and revert to Claude for the heavy lifting. A hassle.

Clearly the demand is there. At this point I expect Anthropic is revenue-limited by their infrastructure availability so it makes sense that they recruit the big players to help beef it up.

Cloudflare Fast-Tracks Post-Quantum Rollout To 2029

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Cloudflare is accelerating its post-quantum security plans and now aims to make its entire platform fully post-quantum secure by 2029. “The updated timeline follows new developments in quantum computing research that suggest current cryptographic standards could be broken sooner than previously expected,” reports SiliconANGLE. From the report:
The decision by Cloudflare to move its post-quantum security roadmap forward comes after Google LLC and research from Oratomic demonstrated significant advances in algorithms and hardware capable of breaking widely used encryption methods such as RSA-2048 and elliptic curve cryptography. […] The company said progress across three key areas — quantum hardware, error correction and quantum algorithms — is advancing in parallel and compounding overall capability. Improvements in areas such as neutral atom architectures and more efficient error correction are reducing the resources required to break encryption, while algorithmic advances are lowering computational complexity. […]

Cloudflare has already deployed post-quantum encryption across a large portion of its network and reports that more than half of human traffic it processes now uses post-quantum key agreement. The company plans to expand support for post-quantum authentication in 2026, followed by broader deployment across its network and products through 2028. By 2029, Cloudflare said, it expects all of its services to be fully post-quantum secure, with those services being available by default across its platform, without requiring customer action or additional cost as part of the company’s commitment to security upgrades.
Google said it plans to accelerate its post-quantum encryption migration target to 2029.

Re:Any best practices for personal crypto?

By Haydn • Score: 4, Informative Thread
I checked https://www.openssh.org/pq.html and they said that OpenSSH version 9.0 and greater solves this problem.

OpenSSH version 10.0 started warning users when connections use cryptography that is not safe against quantum computers.

They didn’t indicate that switching key types will fix anything, though I’m guessing that a newer/longer key might be better.
The important thing is to use a newer version of ssh on both ends of the connection.

New Revelations Reignite Crypto Scandal Involving Argentina’s President Milei

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from the New York Times:
President Javier Milei of Argentina promoted a cryptocurrency last year that quickly skyrocketed in value then cratered just as fast, costing investors millions of dollars and setting off a scandal and an investigation. Mr. Milei said he was simply highlighting a private venture and had no connection to the digital coin called $Libra. New evidence is now raising questions about his assertion. Phone logs from a federal investigation by Argentine prosecutors into the coin’s collapse show seven phone calls between Mr. Milei and one of the entrepreneurs behind the cryptocurrency on the night in 2025 when Mr. Milei posted about $Libra on X. The contents of the calls, which took place before and after Mr. Milei’s post, are not known.

But the phone logs — which were obtained by The New York Times and first reported by a local cable news channel, C5N — suggest a greater degree of communication between Mr. Milei and the entrepreneurs who launched the token than what the president has publicly acknowledged. Newly uncovered messages also suggest Mr. Milei received regular payments from one of the entrepreneurs while he was a congressman. Mr. Milei has not publicly commented on the call logs and other documents, and he did not respond to a request for comment. He is named as a person of interest in the federal prosecutor’s continuing investigation into the digital coin, according to court documents reviewed by The Times, but has not been formally charged with any crime. The latest revelations have revived a scandal that threatens the very foundation of a president who rose to power and was elected president in 2023 by attacking a political class he called corrupt.

Re:This is why Trump loves him.

By ndsurvivor • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Didn’t the Trump admin just give him something like 20 Billion Dollars?

Re:This is why Trump loves him.

By Luthair • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Corrupt together

Re:This is why Trump loves him.

By gtall • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

And who does Bessent work for? Do you really believe el Bunko didn’t sign off on it. I doubt it was his idea since he never has any original ideas of his own. Stop white washing el Bunko, everything he touches has the taint of corruption.

Re: This is why Trump loves him.

By ArchieBunker • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

You enjoying those gasoline prices?

Crypto Is For Crime!

By atrimtab • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Now with “wrench attacks” as XKCD informed us all of years ago.

Complete with wrench attack gangs whose real leaders are offshore directing their minions over phones using voice disguisers!

Just an added twist with all the crooked exchanges, holding companies and ATM machines.

Without strict world-wide regulation the only good move is not to play. Unless you run the the exchange and created the crypto.

Read how Crypto is the crime enabler: Number Go Up!

Stanford Daily Ponders Fate of Bill Gates Namesake Building On April Fools’ Day

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
theodp writes:
"Gates Computer Science Building renamed Peter Thiel Center for Panoptic Computing" reads the headline of an April Fools’ Day story that ran in the Humor section of
The Stanford Daily
(with the further disclaimer that “This article is purely satirical and fictitious”). The story begins: “Following revelations that the billionaire founder of Microsoft, Bill Gates, had a longstanding relationship with convicted child sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein, Stanford has announced it will strip Gates’ name from the William H. Gates Computer Science Building and instead honor alumnus Peter Thiel B.A. ‘89, JD ‘92. Gates, who is not a Stanford alumnus, gave an initial gift of $6 million toward the building’s construction in 1992.”

While fictional, the story does make one wonder what may become of the academic and institutional buildings worldwide named after Bill Gates in the blowback over his past ties to Epstein, which have already played a factor in the breakdown of his marriage to Melinda French Gates and friendship with Warren Buffet. In addition to The Gates Computer Science Building at Stanford, this includes the Bill and Melinda Gates Computer Science Complex at the University of Texas at Austin, Bill and Melinda Gates Hall at Cornell, The Bill & Melinda Gates Center for Computer Science & Engineering at the University of Washington, and The William H. Gates Building at MIT’s Stata Center. Buildings named after Gates’ parents include Mary Gates Hall and William H. Gates Hall at the University of Washington, and The William Gates Building at the University of Cambridge (UK).

Aside from the Thiel angle, The Stanford Daily’s April Fools’ Day story may not be as far-fetched as it may seem — many universities’ naming policies include provisions allowing donors’ names to be removed from buildings, programs, or other facilities under extraordinary circumstances. For example, the University of Washington’s Regent Policy No. 50 states, “The University reserves the right to revoke and terminate any naming on reasonable grounds not limited to the revelation of corporate or individual acts detracting from the University’s mission, integrity, or reputation.” Then again, UW notes that Bill’s parents and siblings served as UW Regents for decades, so one expects Bill will be granted some leeway here for what he has characterized as ‘foolish’ choices on his part.

The real quote!

By CEC-P • Score: 5, Funny Thread
“We aren’t removing his name even though he’s a terrible person because they might up our Microsoft E3 license costs even more” - Standford, probaby (paraphrased).

Billionaire

By YetanotherUID • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
I know this site like kes to single Gates/MS out, but the joke selection of Thiel raises an uncomfortable point. Pretty much ALL billionaire donors with the wherewithal to fund large university buildings projects are truly awful people.
How do you think they got to be billionaires in the first place?

Forget Gates

By ArchieBunker • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

How about the guy who is going to start WW3 at 8pm tonight? His opinion on Epstein? https://www.theguardian.com/us…

“I’ve known Jeff for 15 years. Terrific guy,”

And

He’s a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side

Re:Billionaire

By nightflameauto • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

There’s a pretty meaningful difference between “engage in terrible business practices” and “molest girls.”

While there may be a meaningful difference in theory, in reality it seems the difference is measurable in single-digit numbers against the entire class of folks who become billionaires. And while that’s not a huge number in general, it’s still enough to be classified beyond “concerning.”

Not to call myself out, but this could be a correlation vs causation thing. Maybe the wiring that leads to becoming a billionaire has a strong correlation to the wiring that leads one to becoming a molester/rapist. Both seem to suggest a lack of concern for the well being of others, and a very strong desire to take what you want, regardless of the affect it has on those around you.

Re:Maybe we should just cool it with guilt by asso

By haruchai • Score: 5, Informative Thread

“Why wasn’t Obama’s relationship with Bill Ayers disqualifying?”
because it was investigated

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…

LinkedIn Faces Spying Allegations Over Browser Extension Scanning

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
LinkedIn is facing allegations that it quietly scans users’ browsers for installed Chrome extensions. The German group Fairlinked e.V. goes so far as to claim that the site is “running one of the largest corporate espionage operations in modern history.”

“The program runs silently, without any visible indicator to the user,” the group says. “It does not ask for consent. It does not disclose what it is doing. It reports the results to LinkedIn’s servers. This is not a one-time check. The scan runs on every page load, for every visitor.” PCMag reports:
This browser extension “fingerprinting” technique has been spotted before, but it was previously found to probe only 2,000 to 3,000 extensions. Fairlinked alleges that LinkedIn is now scanning for 6,222 extensions that could indicate a user’s political opinions or religious views. For example, the extensions LinkedIn will look for include one that flags companies as too “woke,” one that can add an “anti-Zionist” tag to LinkedIn profiles, and two others that can block content forbidden under Islamic teachings.

It would also be a cakewalk to tie the collected extension data to specific users, since LinkedIn operates as a vast professional social network that covers people’s work history. Fairlinked’s concern is that Microsoft and LinkedIn can allegedly use the data to identify which companies use competing products. “LinkedIn has already sent enforcement threats to users of third-party tools, using data obtained through this covert scanning to identify its targets,” the group claims. However, LinkedIn claims that Fairlinked mischaracterizes a LinkedIn safeguard designed to prevent web scraping by browser extensions. “We do not use this data to infer sensitive information about members,” the company says. “To protect the privacy of our members, their data, and to ensure site stability, we do look for extensions that scrape data without members’ consent or otherwise violate LinkedIn’s Terms of Service,” LinkedIn adds.

[…] The statement goes on to allege that Fairlinked is from a developer whose account was previously suspended for web scraping. One of the group’s board members is listed as “S.Morell,” which appears to be Steven Morell, the founder of Teamfluence, a tool that helps businesses monitor LinkedIn activity. […] Still, the Microsoft-owned site is facing some blowback for not clearly disclosing the browser extension scanning in LinkedIn’s privacy policy. Fairlinked is soliciting donations for a legal fund to take on Microsoft and is urging the public to encourage local regulators to intervene.

Re:Say after me

By DarkOx • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Exactly Chrome and realistically Chromium is essentially malware. Geeks especially should consider it a civic duty to use basically anything else. Which pretty much leaves Firefox and Safari.

Browser diversity is critical to keeping the web actually open. Even if Chromium is open source, the reality is Google drives the project entirely. It puts them in a powerful position to gatekeep, and that is bad for all the same reasons it was bad when IE-5/6 ruled the web, nearly uncontested.

We don’t want a web where the only standard is whatever chromium does.

Man some LinkedIn users are fragile

By FictionPimp • Score: 5, Funny Thread

“the extensions LinkedIn will look for include one that flags companies as too “woke,” one that can add an “anti-Zionist” tag to LinkedIn profiles…”

Imagine being so petty and fragile that you need to install a whole plugin to tell you what is woke or anti-zionist.

Re:Say after me

By DarkOx • Score: 5, Informative Thread

For the individual that is certainly better than Chrome, but from a perspective of does it give Alphabet, any less influence not really much better.

I come back to if we allow Chromium to become essentially the only online HTML Document rendering engine in use, Google makes all the rules. It is really to large a project for any entity not a large corporate to fork.

Just look at the whole plugin architecture(Manifest V2) stuff, Google got their way because the plugin architecture touches so much and nobody maintaining Chromium based alternative browser could realistically keep up with the mainline if they forked or tried to keep a patch set running.

Google basically unilaterally decided what web-plugins are allowed to do; and nobody was able to stop them.

Re:How is this possible?

By fuzzyfuzzyfungus • Score: 5, Informative Thread
According to the writeup; there are two methods: it is possible for an extension to mark some parts of itself as ‘web accessible’; and linkedin has assembled at least one characteristic file for 6,1000-odd extension IDs and attempts to fetch it to confirm/deny the extension’s presence.

The other is based on the fact that the whole point of many extensions is to modify the site in some way; but the site normally has largely unfettered access to inspect itself, so they have theirs set up to walk the entire DOM looking for any references to “chrome-extension://" and snagging the IDs if found.

Not exactly a ‘declare installed extensions’; but it looks like, out of some combination of supporting the use cases where an extension and page actively interact by design and either not wanting the possibility or not wanting the complexity of trying to enable ‘invisible’ edits(presumably some sort of ‘shadow’ DOM mechanism where as far as the site and everything delivered with it knows only its unedited DOM and resources exist; but the one the user sees is an extension-modified copy of that one, which sounds like it could get messy), inferential attacks are fairly easy and powerful.

Re:Say after me

By thegarbz • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Who said report? No one. Chrome has no interface to report a list of extensions to a website. Extensions expose management interfaces, this is part of their function, and it’s necessary to how they are written, installed, managed, updated, etc. These interfaces can be probed manually if you know the extension ID. So all a website needs to do is load a script and do a call to e.g. chrome-extension://ddkjiahejlhfcafbddmgiahcphecmpfh/. If it gets a 404 error then it knows you have Ublock Lite installed, if it returns ERR_BLOCKED_BY_CLIENT then you know it doesn’t exist.

Firefox and other browsers have similar systems in place. It’s required for how extensions work. It has always existed. No browser out there has successfully prevented fingerprinting, and Firefox’s anti-fingerprinting system actually works by blacklisting browser requests to companies who provide fingerprinting services, not by technical means. In this case according to the report LinkedIn is only doing this on Chrome, but it’s a fantasy to think you’re magically protected by using an alternate browser for any other reason than not being popular makes you less of a target. — In which case you should be promoting the use of Chrome as it would actively raise your security.

Chrome isn’t just providing a nice easy list of shit to identify you with. It’s a game of whack-a-mole, using clever tricks. Always has been.

Case in point, part of the website scans the DOM tree looking for elements that are different to what was served up which would indicate the presence of an extension that is modifying the page. This is trivial to do on *ANY* browser and is completely platform independent. Though it only works for extensions which do something.

China Flies World’s First Megawatt-Class Hydrogen Turboprop Engine

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Longtime Slashdot reader walterbyrd shares a report from Fuel Cells Works:
China says the AEP100, a megawatt-class hydrogen-fueled turboprop engine developed by the Aero Engine Corporation of China, has completed its maiden flight on a 7.5-ton unmanned cargo aircraft in Zhuzhou, Hunan. The 16-minute test covered 36km at 220km/h and 300 meters altitude, with the aircraft returning safely after completing its planned maneuvers. State media described it as the world’s first test flight of a megawatt-class hydrogen-fueled turboprop engine. […] The Aero Engine Corporation of China (AECC) says the result shows China now has a full technical chain for hydrogen aviation engines, from core parts to system integration, which is the kind of capability needed before any industrial rollout can begin.
You can watch a video of the test flight here.

7.5 ton UAV testing flight

By T34L • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

I’m genuinely curious if it’s easier to get cleared on safety permit on a previously unflown engine in a 7.5 ton plane if the plane is unmanned rather than if it’s manned.

I’d expect that at least in EU, it being an UAV would actually make it harder to get it cleared, but I don’t know that for a fact and I wonder how it is there and elsewhere in the world.

Either way, pretty neat!

Re:7.5 ton UAV testing flight

By Mr. Dollar Ton • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

It used to be the case that the testing permits for drones (esp. small ones) were easier to obtain, but the rules were recently tightened across the board. Be that as it may, for an aircraft of this size the paperwork needed by the Chinese FAA equivalent is nearly identical to the one for a manned unit.

You’ll definitely need an air worthiness certification, which is hard to get and identical for both types. For the normal airplane, you’ll also need a licensed pilot, for the drone - a licensed/certified operator, which would be a bit less strict, but not significantly so. You’ll also need air traffic control approval, etc.

TL;DR: nearly the same requirements.

Re:7.5 ton UAV testing flight

By whit3 • Score: 5, Informative Thread
Long distance ocean shipping (weight-is-no-object) would use
intercalation (a saturated solution of hydrogen in a charcoal-like solid).
Neither liquid nor compressed gas can match intercalation for volumetric efficiency.
It’s safer than compressed, as well as lower-storage-cost than refrigerated liquid.

Compressed gas is a no-no for flight safety
reasons: you can’t depend on soft landings.

Fun fact

By DrXym • Score: 5, Informative Thread
Off gassed hydrogen has ~ 37x the warming potential of CO2 on the climate. Not because hydrogen causes warming itself, but because its presence in the atmosphere extends the lifespan of methane by bonding with radicals that would otherwise break down methane sooner. It’s not something we want to see any country or industry adopting.

Re:Dead end

By cusco • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

While the US just repaid a French company a billion dollar deposit to cancel offshore wind farms, China has constructed the largest wind turbines in the world for their newest wind farms.

https://kdwalmsley.substack.co…

This is the world’s largest offshore wind turbine. It is off of Fujian province, in South China. It generates enough power for 44,000 households, or over a hundred thousand people. It displaces 22,000 tons of coal per year. This unit is part of a large farm 30 km offshore, where there are already a number of 16-megawatt turbines, and when those were installed, they were the world’s largest.

It’s a breakthrough in engineering, that this much output comes from a single turbine, instead of a group of them working together, and experts say that it will inform future wind farms. That’s also a region that sees frequent severe storms.

This was all hard to do, then, and we’re curious why the Chinese bothered at all. It required a ship to be specially designed and built, just to get the turbine into position. Having it out there means that China can leave 22,000 tons of coal in the ground they otherwise would have hauled to the surface and set on fire . . .

In December, the Interior Department announced an immediate pause on offshore wind projects under construction in the United States, due to national security risks identified by the Department of War. The government found that big turbine blades create radar interference, and obscure legitimate moving targets and generate false ones.

It’s not great to learn that our money-no-object Pentagon has radars that can’t tell the difference between a supersonic bomber flying toward Washington, or a windmill floating off of Long Island Sound. And it’s also not great that the White House has just told the rest of the world that our radars are that bad. This should be in a super-top-secret Pentagon report, instead of a press release from the White House.

New Jersey Cannot Regulate Kalshi’s Prediction Market, US Appeals Court Rules

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Reuters:
A federal appeals court ruled on Monday that New Jersey gaming regulators cannot prevent Kalshi from allowing people in the state to use its prediction market to place financial bets on the outcome of sporting events. A three-judge panel of the Philadelphia-based 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled 2-1 (PDF) in finding that the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission has exclusive jurisdiction over the sports-related event contracts that Kalshi allows people to trade on its platform. The ruling marked the first time a federal appeals court has ruled on what has become the central issue in an escalating battle over the ability of state gaming regulators to police the activity of prediction market operators.

Kalshi and companies like it allow users to place trades and profit from predictions on events such as sports and elections. States argue that firms like Kalshi are operating without required state licenses, in violation of gaming laws, including bans on wagers by those under 21. Those states include New Jersey, which last year sent Kalshi a cease-and-desist letter stating that its listing of sports-related event contracts on its platform violated state gambling laws that prohibit betting on collegiate sports. Kalshi sued the state, arguing its event contracts qualify as “swaps,” a type of derivative contract, that under the Commodity Exchange Act can only be regulated by the CFTC, which had granted the company a license to operate a designated contract market (DCM).

A lower-court judge had sided with New York-based Kalshi and issued a preliminary injunction, prompting New Jersey to appeal. But a majority of the judges on the 3rd Circuit panel concluded the Commodity Exchange Act likely preempted state law. “Kalshi’s sports-related event contracts are swaps traded on a CFTC-licensed DCM, so the CFTC has exclusive jurisdiction,” U.S. Circuit Judge David Porter wrote. The ruling was in line with the position advanced in other litigation by the CFTC under President Donald Trump’s administration. The regulator last week sued Arizona, Connecticut and Illinois to prevent them from pursuing what it called unlawful efforts to regulate prediction markets.

So much for the rule of law

By rsilvergun • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
There is absolutely no commodity here or anything approaching something regulated by futures trading. This is obviously just gambling.

These gambling businesses are draining about 60 billion a year mostly from Young men. There will be long-term social consequences and if you’re not really old and about to die you will experience them. Like it or not you and I all live in the same society.

Re:Not a fan of it but glad they won

By T34L • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

See there’s no way to word this that won’t sound like whataboutism, but I’m legitimately curious of your opinion on some other ways I think would be really neat to be able to spend my money on that I don’t believe I currently legally can, but I’m interested in your opinion if I should be able to;

- Do you think I should be able to legally spend my money on crowdfunding assassination of someone specific? I feel like there’s some really unpopular people that could be done away with that way. You could pretty much do it on Kalshi as is, too! Any bet against someone dying before some date is effectively funding the would-be assassin who could buy the “will die”, then doing the deed to ensure payout.

- Do you think I should have the freedom to just start a casino in my house, ignoring licenses, taxes and all of those that currently apply to those? Because Kalshi for all intents and purposes just is that. I’m pretty sure I could fairly easily run a webcam pointed at a roulette that’d automatically open and resolve little prediction markets on individual round outcomes, same with the blackjack of course. You don’t even need chips; you just scan a QR code with your phone when you sit down, and tap buttons from there.

- Do you think that I should be able to fund my moidle casino and my assassination “bets” by, instead of entering securities markets and dealing with all the bothersome requirements of public disclosure and meddlesome legal liability tied to issuing publicly traded stock, simply betting on my company’s earnings and performance on Kalshi and effectively using the sentiment there as investment stock people can pass me capital to effectively receive a stake in my biz? Because you really don’t need a stock market if you can just sell bets on your biz on Kalshi.

Betting markets can very effectively simulate money flows in many areas of society that are fairly strictly controlled for a broad variety of reasons, but suddenly, because you do it in crypto and purely virtually, they’re bypassed. I’m, again, seriously, non-rhetorically asking your opinion, because I do wish to learn if you believe all these regulations are wrong and moot and should be relaxed, and thus Kalshi should be allowed to operate as it does, or if you somehow can explain the belief that these old methods should remain regulated and prediction markets should be an exception allowing previously regulated behaviors.

Re:Gambling ruins lots of lives

By Tailhook • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

It’s also the employees of the companies that shut down thanks to embezzlement and theft.

Structuring your nation’s laws around the longevity of companies is a terrible idea. Most companies should fail, because most companies are bullshit created by ambitious idiots and/or scofflaws and deserve failure. Most companies that have ever existed are gone today. And that’s fine. That’s healthy.

Re:Not a fan of it but glad they won

By T34L • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Okay, cool, so, I open a not-a-casino in Houston, Texas and pitch up one of these bitcoin ATMs in the foyer, and since all of the actual transactions of gambling and crowdsourcing assassinations happens on a prediction market hosted in South Africa, from the local legal standpoint the local operation with the blackjack tables and hookers and bounty boards listing the payout on proof of killing all should have the legal liability and tax exposure comparable to a chuck-e-cheese, is that correct?

Again to be clear, I do consider myself moderately pro-gambling, definitely pro-hooker and could probably could think of a person or two whom I wouldn’t mind at all seeing getting ventilated on live TV. But I am trying to understand the people who seem they’d classically have issues with all of these things but seem to believe the virtual standoff distance makes it something else.

Re:So much for the rule of law

By cayenne8 • Score: 4, Funny Thread

Clarence Thomas is another great example, George Bush was angry he was going to have to nominate a black man because he was as you might imagine kind of racist so he picked the most incompetent and corrupt black man he could find and rammed him through the Senate.

I think Judge C has had some of the most brilliant legal reasonings in the past century…thank God for him on the court.

I rate him second only to Scalia....

OpenAI Calls For Robot Taxes, Public Wealth Fund, and 4-Day Workweek To Tackle AI Disruption

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot
OpenAI is proposing (PDF) sweeping policy changes to help manage the societal disruption caused by advanced AI, including taxes on automated labor, a public wealth fund, and experiments with a four-day workweek. The company said the policy document offered a series of “initial ideas” to address the risk of “jobs and entire industries being disrupted” by the adoption of AI tools. Business Insider reports:
Among the core policy suggestions is a public wealth fund, which would see lawmakers and AI companies work together to invest in long-term assets linked to the AI boom, with returns distributed directly to citizens. Another is that the government should encourage and incentivize employers to experiment with four-day workweeks with no loss in pay and offer “benefits bonuses” tied to productivity gains from new AI tools.

The policy document also suggests lawmakers modernize the tax system and shift the tax base to corporate income and capital gains, rather than relying on labor income and payroll taxes that could be hit by a wave of AI-powered job losses. It also recommends taxes related to automated labor. OpenAI also called for the accelerated expansion of the US’s electricity grid, which is already feeling the strain from a wave of data center construction and energy demand for training ever more powerful AI models.

High Regulations Favor Large Companies

By SmaryJerry • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Small companies can’t comply so large companies love it when there is more regulations. OpenAI explicitly calling for robot labor taxes would prevent a lot of competition.

Weak PR

By abulafia • Score: 5, Informative Thread
This is an attempt to reduce fear, but it seems like a pretty sophomore effort.

They have enough money for really good PR, so I have to imagine there are… personalities interfering. Or maybe just one.

Going to be fun watching the hustling as they try to IPO with a CFO who says it won’t work.

Re:Oh come on....

By Powercntrl • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Did the transistor companies get taxed to “compensate” the people/companies who made vacuum tubes that would be put out of work? No.

That would be the original trans panic.

Why would I need to get rich

By rsilvergun • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
If I already own everything and I have a limitless supply of robots to tend to my needs?

Yeah I need some engineers to keep the robots going and some thugs to keep the engineers in line but that’s a few thousand people tops. Everybody else can just go live in squalor.

If you’ve ever seen an Indian reservation before the casinos that’s what the Epstein class has in store for you and me.

Basically they are tired of the exact kind of dependency you are describing. And they are taking steps to eliminate that dependency.

Re: I think it would be a good idea..

By DamnOregonian • Score: 5, Informative Thread
Because that’s only something you can do to a limited extent. Continue doing it, and you’ll run out of paper to print that money on before you’ve got enough for a loaf of bread.
The Fed exists to smooth over panics. Nobody thinks you can print your way to replacing the economic ladder.