Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. A Hacker Broke Into John Deere, SharkNinja With an Army of AI Agents
  2. Apple Announces October 28 ‘Pro and Tell’ Event
  3. Florida DMV Hacked After Police Dept Insecurely Stored Login Info
  4. Elon Musk Vows To Give a SpaceX Share To ‘Every Kid In America’
  5. Wine Ported to OpenBSD
  6. Elizabeth Holmes Doc ‘You Can See Everything’ Shocks With Massive Opening
  7. America Tries Reviving Shuttered Nuclear Plants - Partly to Help Power Data Centers
  8. Mozilla is Calling Out Microsoft for Forcing Edge on Users
  9. Anthropic Announces ‘Public Benefit Fund’, Committing 5% of Its Shares
  10. ‘Human Vs. Robot’ Cage Match Was Illegal, Says California
  11. New Video Game Law Proposed: ‘If You Pay For It, You Own It’
  12. Planned UK Data Center Delayed Until 2030s Over Power Grid Delays. Microsoft Pulls Out
  13. Researchers Discover How To Lead Dying Coral Reefs To a ‘Fast And Full Recovery’
  14. Websites Are Closing Their Doors to AI Agents
  15. More Details on Arrested Saudi OpenAI Employee, Who is Seeking Release on Bail

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

A Hacker Broke Into John Deere, SharkNinja With an Army of AI Agents

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Verge:
A hacker broke into more than 100 websites using an army of AI agents that mostly operated on their own, according to findings from the AI security firm Norforge. Though Norforge doesn’t name the targets, Reuters reports that the victims included companies like John Deere, SharkNinja, and Cummins.

[…] Researchers at Norforge uncovered the attacks through exposed work on Cairn, an open-source AI platform that describes itself as a “general-purpose problem-solving engine.” With Cairn, users set a start and end point for the AI agents, which document their progress as they move forward with the task. However, as noted by Norforge, hackers can also use the tool to orchestrate cyberattacks using AI agents.

The hacker who broke into more than 100 sites was the “most active” among the exposed Cairn instances discovered by Norforge, waging attacks on companies based in the US, Canada, Australia, and Japan, as reported by Reuters. This attacker laid out “preferred intrusion tactics” using fewer than 100 Chinese characters, with successful breaches taking about 23 hours, according to Reuters. Overall, Nordforge found more than 20 exposed Cairn instances that are “likely malicious.”
A John Deere spokesperson said there is “no indication that sensitive information was accessed” as a result of the attack, while Cummins said it’s “investigating the report of a potential cyber-attack on a website operated by one of our third-party vendors.”
Meanwhile, SharkNinja says the breach impacted a standalone site with product support information, and that it has contained the threat.

I wouldn’t complain if they leaked service manuals

By afaiktoit • • Score: 3 • Thread
Just sayin

“no indication that sensitive information was acce

By darkain • • Score: 3 • Thread

“no indication that sensitive information was accessed”

Translation: “We didn’t have proper monitoring in place, so we don’t even know what they did”

Re:Why the fuck

By drinkypoo • • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread

I suggest reading Bruce Sterling’s Heavy Weather, though as always, the most prophetic Cyberpunk novel remains Neal Stephenson’s Snow Crash. His particular vision of techno-feudalism is rapidly coming true, and it’s just as stupid as he imagined it would be. (Obvs the mystical mind virus stuff is not what I mean here.)

Apple Announces October 28 ‘Pro and Tell’ Event

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Following its October 13 HomeView launch, Apple is gearing up for its second hardware event of the month. The event is scheduled for October 28 in Los Angeles and carries the tagline “Pro and tell.” 9to5Mac reports:
Rumors say Apple has a slew of new products to announce at its next event, headlining by its first MacBook Pro with a touchscreen and OLED. According to Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman, here’s what’s on the docket:

- New 14-inch and 16-inch touchscreen MacBook Pro models with OLED displays. They will also have a Dynamic Island for the first time and will be “significantly lighter” than the current models. The new MacBook Pro models are expected to be powered by the M5 Pro and M5 Max chips.
- A revamped iPad mini with an OLED screen, a “revamped speaker system,” and a relocated FaceTime camera
- New iMac and entry-level 14-inch MacBook Pro models powered by the M6 chip, which will “look like their current versions.”

Rinse and repeat

By Tarlus • • Score: 4, Informative • Thread

Pretty much since the advent of OSX I’ve observed this pattern.

1) Apple announces a long-rumored feature or product that their competitors have already offered for years.

2) A sizeable and persistent assemblage of anti-Apple neckbeards spend their time berating Apple for playing catch-up. There’s always that guy who has to respond to articles like these with one-line bangers like “magical” or “innovative”.

3) The product releases and demonstrates some kind of refinement - which sets it apart from the competitors - because Apple has taken the time to make it feel like their operating system was designed around the idea. (Not always the case, less so in recent years, but true often enough.) It makes Apple’s take on the idea more novel and appealing to consumers.

4) In subsequent years, competitors mimic Apple’s approach. The neckbeards go silent.

Followed by something involving an ellipsis and a profit.

- Written from an old Dell running Debian

Florida DMV Hacked After Police Dept Insecurely Stored Login Info

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Florida’s DMV says a September 4 breach exposed driver’s license and motor vehicle records after attackers obtained credentials that a local law-enforcement employee had “improperly stored on an electronic device.” The ShinyHunters group has been linked to the intrusion. Ars Technica reports:
In a notice posted Friday, [Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles (FLHSMV)] confirmed that it took “immediate steps” after discovering that “a malicious actor accessed certain department records on September 4, 2026, using compromised credentials.” There’s “no evidence” that data has yet been misused, the department said, but law enforcement “determined the information potentially affected includes driver license and motor vehicle data, to include document images, and other personal information.”

[…] On a webpage describing the security incident, FLHSMV confirmed that an “international cybercriminal organization” was behind the breach but did not specify which group or how long they had access. Instead, officials claimed to have “promptly mitigated the breach, launched an investigation, and issued required notification to state authorities.” Mitigations included “blocking unauthorized access, resetting relevant user credentials, engaging cybersecurity professionals, and implementing additional safeguards to protect sensitive information,” FLHSMV said. Florida’s investigation is “ongoing,” officials said, but a cybercriminal group called ShinyHunters — which recently claimed credit for hacking the FBI — may have stolen the data.
Florida residents affected by the breach will receive a letter offering one year of free credit monitoring through Sontiq, Inc. Those whose contact information is outdated can email the FLHSMV at customerinquiry@flhsmv.gov to determine whether their data was compromised.

Rules for thee but not for me

By Zondar • • Score: 3 • Thread

Where’s the required multi-factor authentication?

Elon Musk Vows To Give a SpaceX Share To ‘Every Kid In America’

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from CNN:
Elon Musk has said he will give every child in America a stake in SpaceX, his $2 trillion aerospace and artificial intelligence company, as tech firms face intensifying scrutiny over their impact on society. “Next year, I will give one of my SpaceX shares to every kid in America,” he wrote on X on Monday. “This will be the first of many.”

SpaceX only began trading publicly in June (and after the biggest initial public offering in history). The company’s shares were trading for about $146 when the market closed on Friday. Musk’s proposal was thin on detail. It is not clear how those shares would be distributed to the tens of millions of American children or whether all of them would even be eligible. According to the United States Census Bureau, there are roughly 73 million people under the age of 18, making Musk’s potential giveaway worth about $10.7 billion at SpaceX’s current share price.
The move came in response to Anthropic’s announcement on Sunday that it will commit at least 5% of its shares to a “Public Benefit Fund” that will donate money to social causes. “I recommend giving the shares directly to the public,” Musk said in a reply to Anthropic’s announcement. “This is what I will be doing.”

Poll numbers

By ArchieBunker • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

Wow the poll numbers must be pretty bad if he’s resorting to socialism.

Much easier solution

By Rumagent • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
Pay your fair share of taxes, you parasite.

Re:That’s easier to do

By vux984 • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Its a little tricky too, as children generally don’t have suitable investment accounts that can hold publicly traded shares. I’m doubtful they even legally can open those accounts.

So what are they going to do, issue a gazillion single paper share certificates? What a shitshow that would be, the fees and shipping alone around dealing with that for a single share would be nuts, not to mention the hassle of redeeming them, and the untold numbers that would be misplaced or destroyed. And I’m still not sure children can own them, or sign the agreements required to get them.

What else could the do? Create beneficial trusts for every child? Whose going to administer that? and again the fees and management expenses around it would be nuts all for a $150 space-x share?

It might be reasonable for him to set a bunch aside, and as children reach adulthood, let them claim them at that point.
If the idea is that the kid can’t sell it or whatever until they’re an adult anyway, its probably fine. It’ll be income maybe when they receive it, so that could work out badly for some kids though, if they have to sell it to cover the taxes on it, because they don’t have a job yet. Especially if its appreciated to a couple thousand or something. (How are splits etc handled, do they get one or more? Or worse… reverse splits on a single share?)

Great PR!

By kwerle • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

This is like Trump promising $5K if republicans win the midterms. It’s just a PR stunt.

Imagine trying to reason out the tax implications of something like this. The privacy implications. Everything.

Elon: “I really wanted to, but lawyers wouldn’t let me!”

No way to see that coming.

Re:what’s wrong with you people?

By greytree • • Score: 4, Funny • Thread
When the OP said “get some perspective” he did not mean “get the perspective of a spotty, overweight Gender Studies student who hates men, white people, the USA, meat eaters, car drivers and intolerance”.

Wine Ported to OpenBSD

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Wine has been successfully ported to OpenBSD, with developers reporting that dozens of 64-bit Windows applications now run on the operating system. “Even the Remaster of The Witcher 3 which released just last month runs, and runs well,” writes Thomas Frohwein, OpenBSD developer and ports maintainer. OSnews reports:
The biggest limitation seems to be the lack of support for WoW64, so 32bit Windows software won’t work. Still, this is a massive milestone for OpenBSD, and makes especially gaming a somewhat viable option on OpenBSD.

Remember this date…

By Valgrus Thunderaxe • • Score: 3 • Thread
Because it’s the day of OpenBSD on the desktop.

Elizabeth Holmes Doc ‘You Can See Everything’ Shocks With Massive Opening

Posted by BeauHD • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Nathan Fielder and Lance Oppenheim’s Elizabeth Holmes documentary “You Can See Everything” earned more than $15 million in its limited opening weekend, making it one of the biggest documentary launches in decades and the strongest opening for a film on fewer than 1,000 screens since Borat in 2006. It was also “the biggest non-music documentary since ‘Fahrenheit 9/11’ in 2004,” adds CNN. From the report:
Many weekend screenings in cities like New York and Los Angeles were sold out despite the three-hour running time. The film’s distributor, A24, called it “one of the largest limited-release openings of the 21st century.” “You Can See Everything” opened on fewer than 900 screens following a jaw-dropping surprise premiere at the Telluride Film Festival last month.

Fielder and Oppenheim worked on the project in secret for years, filming with Holmes and her partner Billy Evans in the weeks before Holmes went to prison in 2023. Holmes was convicted of wire fraud and conspiracy to defraud Theranos investors, but she tried to convince the filmmakers of her innocence.

Fielder, who appears on camera interviewing Holmes and Evans, takes the film in unexpected directions, thrilling critics and theatergoers. The film has an extraordinarily high 99% “fresh score” on Rotten Tomatoes and a record-high 4.8 rating on Letterboxd.
Further reading: Will New Documentary Make Theranos Founder Elizabeth Holmes More Sympathetic?

Re: Borat…

By AvitarX • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

No. Opened on fewer than 1,000 sceens.

Re:The title sells…

By know-nothing cunt • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

Perhaps the “Massive Opening” of the headline?

Re:The title sells…

By GrimSavant • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

If you want to know where the title comes from:
 
…

It’s from a text message that Elizabeth Holmes sends to Nathan Fielder, shown within the movie.

As you might imagine with Holmes, it is a deeply ironic title.

I saw it a few days ago

By GrimSavant • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

It’s pretty wild, and there is good reason for the hype around it. It’s really stuck in my mind.

It’s a dive into deception and manipulation, and the relationships between some deeply pathological people. Ostensibly it is about the particular scammers depicted and the people making the movie themselves, but there’s a couple moments where you see Toto pulling back the curtain a bit about the grift being more endemic in these Silicon Valley startup types in general.

It is not an entirely conventional documentary. Someone else suggested the category of “meta documentary” (it gets pretty meta), but perhaps it’s a deconstruction of a documentary, or a documentary for a post truth environment? I’m not sure. If you’ve seen other Nathan Fielder works like the Rehearsal the way it goes off the rails will be familiar. And no, the movie does not hide the ball about questions about its objectivity or ethics what the movie is doing itself, it shoves it in your face in downright unsettling ways.

John Carreyrou, the WSJ journalist behind the piece that kicked off the spiraling downfall of Theranos and the most comprehensive chronicler of that fraud, gave You Can See Everything a glowing review.

Re: Fielder in Wired magazine

By fahrbot-bot • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

She looks like a muppet. You’re just attracted to crazy.

And with her blond hair, she could be the next White House Press Secretary. :-)

America Tries Reviving Shuttered Nuclear Plants - Partly to Help Power Data Centers

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
America is “making an unprecedented attempt to revive three shuttered nuclear plants to meet rising energy demand,” reports the Los Angeles Times,

“Two of the plants have contracts with Big Tech companies that will pay a premium to get large amounts of carbon-free energy for data centers…”
No commercial nuclear reactor is known to have resumed generating electricity after beginning the decommissioning process that takes one out of service, though some reactors have restarted after long outages. The Department of Energy is lending as much as $4.4 billion to restart the Palisades Power Plant in Michigan, the Crane Clean Energy Center on Pennsylvania’s Three Mile Island and the Duane Arnold Energy Center in Iowa to restore a combined 2.25 gigawatts of electricity, which can power roughly 2 million homes and businesses. All three of the plants closed before their licenses expired, largely because the electricity they produced was considered too expensive… Restarting a reactor is a fairly quick way to get a lot of electricity, and it’s cheaper than building a new, large reactor, said nuclear engineering expert Todd Allen…

Edwin Lyman, at the Union of Concerned Scientists, said the taxpayer money being used should go toward addressing safety risks. For example, most U.S. plants were built between 1970 and 1990 and were designed to withstand natural disasters of that era, said Lyman, director of nuclear power safety at UCS. But climate change is making extreme weather events more frequent and severe. “It’s possible, if they set the right level of safety and spend the necessary funds to meet that, they could restore these plants to operable condition,” he said. “That’s not happening at this point....”

NextEra Energy and Google are collaborating to restart Duane Arnold by early 2029… Microsoft has a contract with the Crane Clean Energy Center on Three Mile Island just outside Harrisburg. The plant was the site of the nation’s worst commercial nuclear power accident in 1979. The accident destroyed one reactor, leaving the plant with one functioning. In 2019, Constellation Energy’s then-parent company Exelon shut down the functioning reactor, saying it was losing money and that Pennsylvania lawmakers had refused to subsidize it. Constellation Energy announced in 2024 that it would spend $1.6 billion to restart the reactor under a 20-year agreement with Microsoft. It hopes to bring the plant back online in 2027…

Palisades is expected to be the first nuclear plant in the world to resume generating power after beginning the decommissioning process.

Good side effect

By Gilgaron • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
See at least this could be some good they’d be doing on accident instead of burning a bunch of natural gas for no good reason, and it’ll be useful post bubble.

The Expense Is In The Shutdown And Cleanup

By SlashbotAgent • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

The major expense of a nuclear reactor is in decommissioning, the shutdown and cleanup at it’s retirement. This process can take 20 years itself and require billions of dollars.

Where will that decommissioning money come from? Will it be the rate payers and tax payers as has been in the past? You betcha!

Also… If the reactor was already entering the decommissioning phase, we must assume that it was in bad shape. So now they are going to squeeze another twenty years of use out of a worn out reactor? And then go through a 20 year decommissioning process?

This is going to vastly over-run budgets

By shilly • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

We all know that when you re-wire a house, it costs a shit-ton more than new wiring, because you always run into unexpected issues. That exact problem is going to bite them in the ass here, too: they are going to uncover all kinds of shite they have to deal with, not least because of the radioactivity, temperatures, pressures, corrosive chemicals, etc that are inherent to nuclear power plants.

Palisades is already blowing past its budget and timings estimates for this exact reason: 1,163 steam generator tubes with stress corrosion cracking, way more than expected, leaks in underground water pipes, valves requiring replacement, major turbine refurbishment etc.

Wonderful

By Ol Olsoc • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread
1960’s Nuclear reactors, Neutron impinge pipes. What could go wrong?

There is a real problem with the Data Center model. It will always be “How much energy do we need? How much energy is available? Twice that amount.” Then twice more, then to infinity, and beyond.

Have the Tech bros considered RBMK reactors? Maybe creating a star for direct fusion power? And what happens when the present data centers need new data centers for centering datasets data?

I’m not even fundamentally against AI. I do however feel that there is a real lack of vision. going on Remember early electronic computers? Behemoths of vacuum tubes, sucking up power, some needing constant tube replacement because with that many tubes, some will go bad in normal use.

That is where AI, and even the Data Centers are now. And the Data Center Bros are in a mindset that people who thought ENIAC and Goliath were going to be forever computers. Maybe some time should be taken to move from the infinity based model, to getting control over it.

Now, I could be wrong, but some idea of history and technology, and bubbles, tells me that at least my opinion is thought out, and the present paradigm is not sustainable.

Re: Good side effect

By OrangeTide • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

We’re going to switch our nuclear power plants to be monitored by AI to reduce staffing needs

Mozilla is Calling Out Microsoft for Forcing Edge on Users

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
“Mozilla reps tell me they’ve met with Microsoft about their concerns,” reports PC Magazine, “but that the company wasn’t responsive.”
“They’ll do the minimum the law requires to respect user choice,” explains Kush Amlani, Mozilla’s counsel overseeing global competition and regulatory work… Mozilla recently marked 100 days since it released an 87-page report detailing the ways in which Microsoft pushes Edge on Windows PCs.... One example is how Windows often displays a “Let’s finish setting up your PC” pop-up after an OS update. This screen has an enabled-by-default option to “use recommended browser settings,” which makes Edge the default web browser.

However, that screen doesn’t appear in Europe. European laws now force Microsoft to make Windows more respectful of user choices. For instance, in European countries, the Start menu opens links in your default web browser rather than in Edge, as it does everywhere else. Amlani says Mozilla wants Microsoft to release the European version of Windows to the rest of the world. However, he thinks this will require government action. As he puts it, “Microsoft can do better when it’s forced.”
The last line of the article sums up Mozilla’s main point. “No one should have to fight their OS this hard on something as simple as a browser preference.”

Is this news?

By commodore73 • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
I think this would only be news if Microsoft or some government entity were to do something about it. Otherwise, it just seems like the same old headline that’s been haunting us as long as Microsoft has existed - Microsoft abuses its users to harm competition. That being said, I actually thought edge was a decent browser, but that was years ago when I still used Windows. As a veteran .NET programmer that actually loved Microsoft Office, Windows 11 was just more abuse than I could take.

Not just the browser

By quonset • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Microsoft tries its best to force you to use Edge to open a pdf. If I have Adobe Reader set as my default pdf reader, that should be the end of it. Nope. Certain updates have reverted to using Edge so I, and others at my place of work, have to go in and reset the default.

Once someone has something set as their default, it should never be tampered with unless it’s done by the user.

more like Microsoft and Google than ever

By metac0rtex • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
I had to setup a fresh Firefox profile a few days back and I was astonished by how many user-hostile checkboxes that I had to uncheck. AI, sponsors in home page, firefox studies, un-removable search engines, malware protection that sends every site that I visit to google, the list is just endless. After all of that I still have to dive into about:config to find and disable at least a half-dozen other opt-out features. The whole thing feels exactly like the endless hoops that one has to jump through when installing Windows or using Edge or Chrome. I used to choose Firefox because Mozilla felt like a much more user-friendly option. I am not sure that this is still the case.

Re:FIrefox losing to Edge

By ArchieBunker • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

Firefox does everything BUT making a better browser. They’re always fiddling with cosmetic layouts or adding dumb tools that are already in the OS. Like a screenshot tool for example, what OS doesn’t have one built in today? Last week they have us rounded tabs with a light purple hue. How about fixing some old bugs or making things render faster?

Re:stop menu

By robot5x • • Score: 4, Informative • Thread

‘My Documents’ felt like the start of a slippery slope where filepaths became abstracted away. In a business context, add in Teams/Sharepoint/Onedrive and no wonder nobody knows where their files actually are any more.

Anthropic Announces ‘Public Benefit Fund’, Committing 5% of Its Shares

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
“Anthropic says it’s committing 5% of its shares to a ‘public benefit fund’,” reports TechCrunch, “structured as a wholly-owned entity within the company — with the option to contribute an additional 2% for every 50% increase in Anthropic’s value.”

Important context from CNBC:
The timing of Anthropic’s public fund announcement is both mandatory to prepare for an initial public offering, and “beneficial from an image perspective,” especially as AI reshapes the jobs market, Lise Buyer, partner at IPO advisory firm Class V Group, told CNBC…

Anthropic said it will share more about the fund structure and governance in the coming months, including valuation milestones that may increase the stake. It said it will also share progress on the fund in an upcoming public benefit report. In response to Anthropic’s announcement, Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk said on X that he “recommend[s] giving the shares directly to the public.”
Anthropic’s announcement hints the fund could address job-market displacements. It says the fund “might” explore “large donations to traditional nonprofits” — or, that it “might” explore “direct distributions to specific populations. One example is labor market impacts.”

It then argues AI could “cause instability” for many workers. And while Anthropic has already committed $200 million for “studying and addressing” this issue, Sunday’s announcement says “bolder” approaches may be needed, and that the Fund “will have the versatility to pursue them.”

“Combined with its co-founders’ pledge to donate 80% of their equity and an employee donation matching program, roughly 20% of Anthropic’s shares will be dedicated to public purposes,” reports Reuters, “excluding any additional shares added later.”

We found a tax break!

By locater16 • • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread
And how to turn our tax break into a PR release!!

A Public Benefit Fund is a Slush Fund

By drnb • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
A Public Benefit Fund (PBF) is a Slush Fund that allows a company to spend money on stuff that does not enhance shareholder value. Its a legal technique to avoid doing what is profitable. Anthropic gets to define whatever the “public benefit” is, and divert shareholder money to it, and shareholders cannot do a damn thing about it. Its a way to fund pet projects of executives without any oversight.

Sure a PBC (Corporation) or PBF can actually do good, but despite the name it does not have to. “Good” is only in the eyes of those who created the PBF or PBC.

I’ve watched that shit for 20 years with MSFT

By T34L • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread
Grew up in one of the many countries where Microsoft “paid for” so very much of school equipment, and all that amazing “free” gear cost the schools was curriculum conveniently teaching exclusively use of Microsoft OS and complete office suite. I’m looking towards the “public benefit fund” wholly dedicated to nurturing the public impression that all these elusive jobs are one free retraining making you a loyal Anthropic user away. I’ve eaten many a “free” lunch over the course of my life and, as a paying Anthropic customer, I’d not feed anything they hand out for the “public benefit” to my dog, or any other living being I’d care about the welfare of.

funds

By awwshit • • Score: 4, Funny • Thread

> direct distributions to specific populations

Let me guess, a legal fund for jailed AI Executives?

Re:We found a tax break! (No, we didn’t!)

By Rei • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

Reality: No. They’re forming a wholly-owned LLC, not a 501(c)(3) charity. They’re treated as a disregarded entity for tax purposes. Transferring shares from Anthropic to the new LLC is just moving money from Anthropic’s left pocket to its right pocket. You don’t get a tax deduction from that. To get a deduction from IRC 170, you have to make an irrevocable transfer to a qualified 501(c)(3) charity.

If Anthropic later donates from this LLC to actual charities, it could then claim a corporate charitable deduction (against up to 10% of their profits - and note that word, profits; also, there’s no breaks for UBI programs targeted at individuals). But the formation of this entity and transfer of 5% of their shares to it does not give them any sort of a tax break whatsoever, and there’s no difference between donating from this structure to a charity and donating directly from Anthropic. In fact, by forming this structure, they’re skipping a potential tax break that they could get by forming and donating to a 501(c)(3) upfront.

(If your next question is “why not a 501(c)(3), then?”, the answer is because there’s all sorts of IRS restrictions on 501(c)(3)s, including distributing at least 5% of assets annually, excise taxes on investment gains, strict limits on cash transfers to individuals, etc)

I get that it’s popular for mod points to be cynical, but at least focus your cynicism on factuality. Try this: “We found a PR cheat! And how to turn things our CEO wants to do anyway and might not do until many years from now into a pre-IPO press release!”

‘Human Vs. Robot’ Cage Match Was Illegal, Says California

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
“A human defeated two of the three robots he faced in a cage fight recently held in San Francisco,” reports the Los Angeles Times, noting that videos of the event drew more than 10 million views on YouTube.

But “the humans behind that fight could face a battle of their own — the legal type — if they want to hold another event like ‘Human Vs. Robot,’ the Sept. 18 competition that placed influencer Frankie LaPenna inside an octagon to battle three humanoid robots that were controlled remotely by a human operator in separate MMA-style fights…”
Wearing spiked gloves, a helmet and protective padding, the 5-foot-6, 205-pound LaPenna held his own against all three bots. He dominated his first opponent, referred to at the fight as "the child robot.” Next came an imposing "Terminator”-inspired humanoid, which was listed on the fight video as 6-feet and 200 pounds with a kick force of 850 pounds. The robot landed several hard kicks, including one that knocked LaPenna across the mat and another with an impact that brought the humanoid to the ground and caused its head to come off — but the human seemed to gain strength as the match went on and eventually stood triumphantly with his foot on the machine’s crumpled body.

LaPenna was dominant early in his final match, in which he faced a robot that resembled a “Predator” from the movies of the same name. After landing several punches and kicks and taking his opponent to the ground multiple times, LaPenna eventually became fatigued and called for the match to be ended. “He doesn’t get tired. He doesn’t stay down,” LaPenna said in a postmatch interview.
“The crowd of about 100 (humans, not humanoids) was thrilled,” writes the New York Times. (After beating his first robot opponent, LaPenna told his interviewer, “Clankers zero, humans one.”)

But the New York Times adds that “Those who know humanoid robots best highly recommend against fighting them.”
“It’s very unfair to put a human in with a heavily motorized system that’s only going to dominate,” said Ken Goldberg, a professor who oversees the automation lab at the University of California, Berkeley. “There’s nothing surprising about that....” He said he understood the appeal of the fights that Robot Entertainment Kombat (REK) was staging, noting that it tapped “into some of the fear and frustration with robots that people feel.... I mean, they love to see the human kick the robot’s gearbox,” he said. But the odds of that human fighter getting his gearbox kicked are much greater, Dr. Goldberg said, given that REK’s humanoid robots can weigh several hundred pounds and are made of steel.
To be fair, it looked like sometimes the robot just fell over. (And the robots were human-controlled, not programmed with split-second reactions…)

But “Not everyone is a fan,” adds the Los Angeles Times:
On Sept. 23, the California State Athletic Commission sent a cease-and-desist order to REK, its CEO Cix Liv and “all persons holding, promoting, advertising or sponsoring unsanctioned human versus humanoid robot cage fight.” The letter states that “any boxing or mixed martial arts contest, match, or exhibition, involving any human in the State of California” requires the prior approval of the commission and that it is a misdemeanor to hold such an event without obtaining a license or permit from the state. A spokesperson for the California Department of Consumer Affairs, which oversees the CSAC, said in a statement emailed to The Times that the commission is “committed to protecting the safety of the public and integrity of combat sports.”

“Unsanctioned activity puts the physical and financial well-being of all those involved at risk and such activity will not be tolerated,” the statement said.

Okay, but

By 93 Escort Wagon • • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

How would he do against The Crushinator - or Destructo?

Re:Okay, but

By 93 Escort Wagon • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

More seriously… I decided to watch the video of the guy against that “Terminator” non-autonomous robot. Just about everything the guy did had ZERO effect on the robot. The robot’s attacks, on the other hand, were clearly dominant. But the robot fell over on its own, twice… and after the second fall the guy just walked over and declared “victory”. It was pretty bogus.

Not sure what’s meant to be demonstrated here

By Jeremi • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

It’s perfectly possible to build a machine that will incapacitate a human at close range; all of the world’s militaries have been doing it for years.

It’s also possible to deliberately dial down the machine’s combat effectiveness to the point where a fight against a human might not be a foregone conclusion.

OTOH, having done the latter, what have we learned? That we can design and build a robot that we nerfed just enough that it usually loses in hand-to-hand combat?

Re:Not sure what’s meant to be demonstrated here

By T34L • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Not sure what’s meant to be demonstrated here

The extremely unsurprising excitement of AI boosters to see a person beat up by an anthropomorphic robot.

I’m jus’ a simple country engineer

By RightwingNutjob • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

but don’t a “boxing match” need *two* opponents?

Legally, isn’t just livestreaming a workout with *very* specialized exercise equipment?

New Video Game Law Proposed: ‘If You Pay For It, You Own It’

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
“When you pay for a game, you should own it,” says U.S. Representative Ritchie Torres (D-NY), introducing a new bill to fight the practice of “a rental disguised as a sale”.

Kotaku reports:
The fifth best-selling game of 2024 in the U.S. was NBA 2K25. Every year, fans dump hundreds of hours and hundreds of dollars into the grindy NBA basketball sim. But just a little over two years after its release, 2K Games confirmed it’s already pulling the plug on it. The game will be delisted from digital storefronts on October 30. By January 1, 2027, online servers will go offline as well, making it impossible to play the most popular modes. A game millions paid $70 for will become mostly useless. Democratic Congressman Ritchie Torres wants to change that.

“I think there should be a simple rule: if you pay for it, you own it,” Torres told Kotaku in a phone interview this week. To make that the law of the land, the U.S. representative for New York’s 15th congressional district since 2021 plans to introduce legislation in Congress called the Power To The Players Act. The bill would direct the Federal Trade Commission to create regulations protecting ownership rights for video games. Companies selling digital games would need to grant players more than just a license that can expire at any time, and games with online features would need to provide offline modes that still work even when servers eventually shut down…

The Power To The Players Act noticeably leaves out other types of digital media like movies and music, though Terminator 2 and a bunch of other movie purchases were ripped from people’s digital libraries earlier this year.
Representative Torres “did not confirm if the bill will have any cosponsors,” the article acknowledges, “or whether any of his Republican colleagues will sign on to support it.”

But players will see the bill’s importance next month, the article points out, “when Grand Theft Auto 6 releases as just a download code in a box, giving fans no control over a purchase that starts at $80.

Re:“if you pay for it, you own it”

By Rei • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

In Europe, it is. Article 6 of the Software Directive grants an “interoperability exemption”. The lawful licensee of software has the statutory right to strip DRM in order to achieve interoperability. Any EULA terms that prohibit reverse engineering for interoperability are automatically treated as void. Article 5(1) of Directive 2009/24/EC also grants the ability to decompile to fix bugs that impair the ability to use the software, even if the supplier prohibits it. So long as you don’t then start sharing your “offline mode” version of the software, you’re within your rights

People in Europe are within their rights to task an AI to decompile and tweak a game they own make an “offline mode” version of it, or to create their own servers or whatnot if the manufacturer plans to shut them down or otherwise strip features that the user paid for.

Of course, the US is less consumer-friendly in this regard.

Re:“if you pay for it, you own it”

By Rei • • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

BTW, this also applies to old games. Have an old game that no longer runs on modern operating systems? In Europe, you have the right to task an AI to fix it so it will run.

Adding *new features*, mind you, is trickier. You’re not allowed to decompile and alter a program to add new features, but you *are* allowed to decompile for interoperability purposes. So you are within your rights to task an AI to decompile a program to figure out how to link a mod into it and then to write a mod.

It must suck to wake up everyday and be so wrong

By rsilvergun • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
You could just Google this.

So yes initially the Clinton administration wanted back doors in encryption software. After a lot of backlash and several science researchers explaining to the administration rather calmly that it would never work the administration didn’t about face and stop supporting and calling for the back doors.

This is more or less how it’s supposed to work. Administrative types suggest something, science types take a look, science types either find that it’s a good idea or it’s a bad idea. Administrative types listen to the science types and that’s that.

This is exactly what happened with the Clinton administration. They came up with a stupid fucking idea which to be fair they should have known was stupid in the first place but they are administrative types not science types. The science types explain to the administrative types why it was a terrible idea. And in this case the administrative types being Democrats listened to the science types.

Meanwhile the entire Republican party is telling you that vaccines cause autism and miscarriages. I especially like the miscarriage one because Joe Rogan went around pushing it to morons and the statistic being thrown about was vaccinated women had an 80% miscarriage rate, which was true as long as you ignored the fact that it was in the first trimester and only counted pregnancies to finished in that. Of time and yeah no fucking shit completed pregnancies in the first trimester often miscarry…

The Republican party does not listen when scientists speak. The Democrat party does. If you give a shit about encryption or vaccines or science or reality you vote blue.

Now it’s possible you’re innocent in all this and not just taking pot shots at Clinton because he’s not on your team. If that’s the case you need to stop and ask who told you that Bill Clinton opposed encryption because whoever told that to you was lying in the exact same way that the people telling you that vaccines cause miscarriage 80% of the time. And you need to start getting angry at the people who are lying to you. Because it’s not the Democrats.

On the other hand if you’re just taking pot shots because he’s not on your team that will backfire on you eventually when the Republicans collapse the economy yet again. But you’re probably going to double down because you’re in too deep… So maybe someday you’ll get tired of being lied to. Good luck

Re:“if you pay for it, you own it”

By tlhIngan • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

Why did this Mr. Torres (Democrat from NY — That part is important) leave this out? Is it because the film industry is all democrat and the tech industry is libertarian? Can’t be.

Or maybe because it isn’t needed? Movies and music are available in a format you own.

For music - they’re basically all DRM free so you buy it you own it. You can also buy it on CD, vinyl, cassette tape or other formats.

For movies, well, you can still buy DVDs and Blu-Rays, and you buy those you own them.

For videogames, other than GoG, that doesn’t exist. You buy PC games with the courtesy from Valve/Steam, Epic, Microsoft, Sony, etc. If they say you aren’t allowed to play the game anymore, they can block you from playing it.

But with my CDs, purchased music, DVDs and Blu-Rays, no one can prevent me from watching it.

Mandate ability to host independent servers

By couchslug • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

If a game is discontinued that’s no reason to deprive the willing of ability to host their own servers.

That option adds value long after a company ends support. It’s a feature not a barrier to profit.

Planned UK Data Center Delayed Until 2030s Over Power Grid Delays. Microsoft Pulls Out

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
July: Nvidia-backed Nscale is building a £2bn data centre at Loughton in Essex, with Microsoft signed up as its anchor tenant. But it can’t get the electricity to switch on, reported The Next Web:
Nscale’s problem is not really Nscale’s. It is Britain’s. Grid-connection times have become the single biggest brake on new data centres. Some UK projects face waits stretching close to a decade for enough power. One estimate found more than a quarter of data-centre capacity slipped in 2025 alone.
“The data centre was due to receive its power supply at the end of the year,” reports the BBC. “But as first reported by the Telegraph on Sunday, Nscale has been told this will not happen until the 2030s.” (Though Nscale and Microsoft are still working together on other projects in Norway, Portugal and America.)

But now anchor-tenant Microsoft has pulled out of the Essex deal, reports the Telegraph, adding that Microsoft’s move “leaves the site in apparent limbo. The company was its only announced customer, having agreed to rent 23,000 Nvidia AI chips at the facility…”
Microsoft’s decision threatens to undermine Nscale’s attempts to push ahead with a Wall Street flotation worth up to $35bn (£26bn), despite a brutal sell-off in AI computing stocks. Rival data centre developers have seen their share prices plunge over the last week on concerns that they will struggle to repay their debts as interest rates and inflation continue to rise.... Tech analyst Gartner said last week that $3.5 trillion could be written off by 2030 if the AI boom fails to deliver on its promises.
And “our research indicates that enterprise and consumer AI revenue will be insufficient to support profitable returns on all planned AI capital expenditures during this period,” Gartner wrote:
“In 2026, AI providers are expected to spend nearly $1 trillion on AI infrastructure, and are forecast to invest an additional $6 trillion between 2027 and 2030,” said Will Sommer, Sr Director Analyst at Gartner.... Failure to achieve sustainable return on investment capital (ROIC) on rapidly depreciating assets would almost certainly necessitate write-downs. Based on Gartner projections, a continued AI infrastructure investment trajectory could leave more than $4 trillion in asset value exposed to write-down risk through 2032. In this scenario, Gartner does not expect the 12% ROIC to be achieved until the end of 2032 at earliest…

Gartner estimates AI-optimized IaaS spending will grow from $66 billion in 2027 to $174 billion in 2030. “The growth in spending on AI-optimized IaaS will be too low for most AI compute providers to recover their AI investments before the current generation of AI semiconductors is replaced,” said Sommer. By 2030, Gartner predicts that cost pressure and a lack of a differentiating business model will force over 80% of neocloud [AI-specialized infrastructure] providers to cease independent operations.

Re:Good

By JoshuaZ • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

Sooner or later people are going to realize that AI is just another name for Linear Algebra and all this will come crashing down

There are at least four problems with this. First, linear algebra is from a math standpoint insanely powerful. For example, all of representation theory https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Representation_theory is using linear algebra to understand groups. Much of the study of modular forms https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modular_form involves understanding the behavior of modular forms over SL_2(Z) which has heavy linear algebra elements to it. People who see linear algebra as somehow a weak thing are often people who took a single semester of it and didn’t do much else with it.

Second, the idea that these AI systems are just linear algebra isn’t accurate anyhow. While there’s a lot of linear involved, a major part of how transforms like LLMs work is the intervening non-linear layers, which use ReLu https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rectified_linear_unit, Softplus, or a similar function. So, summarizing this as just linear algebra isn’t accurate. It is linear algebra with some spice.

Third, even if this were somehow just linear algebra, that shouldn’t therefore be a reason to think that there’s any limits to what is going on. At the end of the day, the empirical success is what matter, and systems which can do things like prove the quasi-Riemann Hypothesis or solve other major math problems are pretty impressive regardless of what is under the hood. So, if one does think this is just linear algebra, that’s not a reason to dismiss the systems but a reason to increase your estimate of what can be done with mere linear algebra.

Fourth, slowing down connections like this may make crashes *less likely.* In particular, the main way we could have a serious bubble here is over-investment. Delays including power grid delays force bottlenecks on the investment level, and make that sort of problem less likely.

We may be in a bubble here. Certainly some elements look very bubble-like. In the late 1990s, during the dot-com boom, one had people making perfectly normal businesses but just tacking on “on the internet” to it and it would get millions of dollars of funding automatically. See for example pets.com . And we’re seeing some of that now; we’ve had a whole bunch of businesses see their stock price shootup just because they mention AI. So we may be in a bubble, and it may crash now, or might crash never or decades from now. (Arguably the US had an 80 year automobile bubble that didn’t crash until the late 2000s which then forced the auto bailout.) But the other thing to keep in mind is that a crash does not mean the tech goes away. In 1873, the US had a devastating collapse of the railroad bubble, and yet railroads continued to grow, with the amount of track not peaking until around 1910 https://transportgeography.org/contents/chapter5/rail-transportation-pipelines/rail-track-mileage-united-states/. Similarly, although the internet bubble burst, by 2015, one had more internet use than even the most internet hyping person in 1998 would have likely dreamed of. A bubble bursting does not mean the tech itself goes away.

The problem is UK energy policy

By Budenny • • Score: 3 • Thread

The problem is UK energy policy. It is to build large amounts of intermittent power generation in places where there is no demand.

The business case for doing this rests on LCOE calculations which omit the costs of remedying intermittency and also the cost of getting the power to where there is demand, in the present case, Essex, but in general in the Midlands and South.

The result is that the UK has to build a hugely expensive new transmission network from the wind farms off the north coast of Scotland to the Midlands and South. It still has no specific problem for how to supply continuous reliable power from wind - the only solution is of course gas fired generation, but that is politically incorrect.

The country has the highest electricity prices in the OECD. Which as inevitable - however you fake the numbers with LCOE, the costs are real and have to be recovered somehow.

The program also involves large amounts of solar. However, the UK is the second worst country in the world for solar power generation (the worst is Ireland). This doesn’t help either, and just increases the size of the intermittency problem.

What is coming towards the UK is probably a nationwide blackout, and certainly rolling regional ones. If they are sucessful in the other part of their program they will increase demand substantially by converting heating to heat pumps and transport to EVs. And by persuading companies to install lots of data centers for AI etc. Sooner or later these plans will run into the one or two week period which occurs most years, when there is a blocking high to the southwest and dead calms. Wind generation falls well below 10% of faceplate and stays there for a couple of weeks. At 4pm, this being winter, solar vanishes - there has been negligible amounts anyway even earlier in the day, this being winter at these latitudes. There are no plans to keep supply going when this happens. They need plans to build out masses of new gas - because the old installations they depend on at the moment are reaching end of life. Are there any such plans? Of course not. And if you were building out that much gas, why do you need all that wind and transmission?

You don’t!

This cannot work. You would have to be blinkered or silly (or paid off with tax breaks, and even then its not clear these could be big enough) to contemplate investing heavily in a data center operation in the UK till they get this turned around, as in U-turn, abolish the net zero silliness and build reliable low cost generating capacity. And stop building transmission links to nowhere.

As for Global Warming and Climate Change, its irrelevant. Whatever is happening with the climate, there is nothing that UK energy policy can do to have any effect on it. All the current programs can do is make a nationwide blackout more likely. And the world will then, if it happens, watch a world first: a country trying to restart its grid using wind power. Good luck with that one.

Researchers Discover How To Lead Dying Coral Reefs To a ‘Fast And Full Recovery’

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
Gizmodo reports:
Roughly 84.4% of the world’s coral reefs suffered bleaching-levels of heat stress during the last major marine heat wave from January 2023 to September 2025, with over half already lost compared to coral coverage in the 1950s… But there’s some good news, thanks to a new study published this Wednesday in the journal Science Advances: Marine ecologists at Stanford have discovered that bleached corals can be revived via contact with a healthy coral neighbor, who (like a good neighbor) shares their photosynthetic, symbiotic algae (Symbiodiniaceae) with their peers.

“This incredible new result — that fast and full recovery is possible in bleached coral — can inspire solutions that eventually may be scalable,” [Fiorenza Micheli, a marine ecologist with Stanford’s Center for Ocean Solutions and study co-author, told the journal Nature]… Unlike their controls, bleached coral in contact with healthy coral recovered in just eight weeks… [T]he surprise discovery of this method alongside the other techniques that marine conservationists are now actively pursuing — including the successful deep-freezing and revival of at-risk coral sampled from Hawaii — could offer threatened reefs the lifeline they need. Coral contact could super-charge other efforts, like the selective breeding of heat-tolerant corals and the cultivation of protected coral nurseries

Rear guard action?

By Ocker3 • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
Is this more than a rear guard action considering how common mass bleaching events are? How more coral can we re-grow between bleachings?

Websites Are Closing Their Doors to AI Agents

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot • Skip
The Verge reports:
OpenAI, Meta, Google, Instinct, and others promise their agents can scour the internet on your behalf, doing anything from booking a dinner reservation and cleaning out your inbox to buying new shoes. But what happens when the rest of the internet won’t play nice?

In recent weeks, users of services like Meta’s Muse, xAI’s Grok, OpenAI’s Dots, and Instinct have reported blocks preventing their AI agents from performing tasks across top websites. Yelp told TechCrunch that it only allows AI agents that pay for its data licensing program, while Delta Air Lines is preventing them from booking tickets on behalf of users. JPMorgan Chase and Charles Schwab have also confirmed that they’re blocking AI agents from accessing accounts due to security concerns. Some users say sites that previously worked with their AI agent are no longer accessible, including Cars.com and Amtrak, suggesting other companies could be quietly blocking them....

Muse, Meta’s deceptively cute AI assistant, most recently faced the wrath of Amazon, which said its “continued access” violates its site policies. There are reports of xAI’s Grok, Instinct’s AI agent, and OpenAI’s Dots being unable to use Amazon as well. xAI owner Elon Musk responded by saying that maybe he “should start a competitor to Amazon.” The more places bots struggle to access, the greater the questions about how useful they are....

Instead of trying to fight Amazon, [Meta] has partnered with retailers like Walmart, Gap, Sephora, Best Buy, and others, allowing Muse to shop on their sites. At the same time, Shopify has also opened its network of storefronts to AI agents.

playing nice

By awwshit • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

> when the rest of the internet won’t play nice?

Umm, let’s see, Agents pound sites and do unexpected things. Then people block Agents from sites. People making Agents claim the Internet won’t play nice. Sure, makes perfect sense that it is the entire Internet that is wrong and Agents are perfect if lawless entities.

We live in the wackiest timeline.

Re:Long-term, how can they stop them?

By PPH • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

If you are willing to give an agent your credentials,

Give? Remember when you said “OK” to Copilot getting access to your desktop, browser tabs, etc? Or maybe didn’t click “Hell no!” fast enough?

We got your credentials right here, buddy.

Re:If there’s one thing we’ve learned

By Brain-Fu • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

To be fair, websites don’t respect people’s rights to say “no” to user tracking and serving up ads, trying their darndest to defeat ad blockers and such.

Boo effing hoo

By Morpeth • • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

This kind of automation ultimately causes problems for ‘regular’ every day consumers and gets hijacked by a smaller group of assholes; plus the technology isn’t mature enough to be trusted. So what happens when an agent runs amok, buys a too many of x, and the user says ‘wait! I didn’t want 100, I want to you to eat the cost of me returning it, and company y says, too fucking bad you bought it’ — who’s liable? (my answer is the dumbass with the agent, but who knows how it will pan out)

Only a few years ago some of the kind of stuffs agents do (or at least have access to) we’d call a virus or malware, how things change.

LOL. Sure. Go ahead, Musk.

By SeaFox • • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

xAI owner Elon Musk responded by saying that maybe he “should start a competitor to Amazon.”

Classic Musk: Underestimating the talent and effort needed to break into a business. It took Amazon nine years to become profitable. At the most his attempt will just be “MAGA Temu” and he’ll hide the folly by merging it into a business that is working, like he’s already done with other properties he owns.

More Details on Arrested Saudi OpenAI Employee, Who is Seeking Release on Bail

Posted by EditorDavid • • View on SlashDot
More details are emerging about Saudi OpenAI employee Abdulrahman Alfozan, who was arrested by the FBI for allegedly planting a recording device in an executive conference room. Previously Alfozan “was an engineer at Meta,” notes the New York Times, “before joining a start-up that went through Y Combinator, the Silicon Valley start-up accelerator. He gained permanent residency status in the United States in 2020, according to court documents, and was hired by OpenAI in July 2025.”

14 months later the conference room recording device was inserted in a USB port on the back of a television, and then concealed in toilet paper, according to a statement from America’s Justice Department. (There’s even a photo of a device — and a photo of Alfozan entering the executive conference room and appearing to look behind the television where the device was inserted.) The FBI’s says a chatbot account associated with Alfozan’s spouse showed prompts asking about installing and obfuscating a recording device. And the complaint alleges that OpenAI security personnel also found a bag Alfozan left in a different room which contained his wallet, his ID, and another recording device.

Discussions in that room included “highly confidential technical, commercial, and strategic information, including proprietary research,” according to the FBI, “as well as nonpublic information about Open AI’s technical progress and strategic decisions…”

“If convicted, Alfozan faces a maximum penalty of 5 years in prison and a $250,000 fine, followed by 3 years of supervised release.”

Friday Alfozan’s lawyersrequested his release from custody, saying Alfozan agrees to wear an ankle monitor, remain at home, surrender his passport and “not possess any covert audio or video recording or surveillance device.” They argue that the one-way ticket he’d purchased to Saudi Arabia just continues a long-standing habit of buying one-way tickets over the years for air travel, since his tech career often involves last-minute changes to meeting schedules, and “70% of the airline bookings in his email since January 2021 (96 of 138) were one-way tickets.”

His lawyers also presented 46 letters of support, including letters from former Meta colleagues, ten company founders and chief executives, and more than a dozen engineers and engineering managers.

Dumbest spy ever

By marcle • • Score: 3 • Thread

Conceals (poorly) a recording device, then leaves a similar device lying around in a bag with his wallet and ID? It’s so blatantly incompetent that it makes me wonder if this isn’t some red herring in a larger plot.