Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Meta Signs $27 Billion AI Infrastructure Deal With Nebius
  2. Data Centers Overtake Offices In US Construction-Spending Shift
  3. Court Rules TCL’s ‘QLED’ TVs Aren’t Truly QLED
  4. Animated ‘Firefly’ Reboot In Development With Nathan Fillion
  5. Sodium-Ion Battery Tested for Grid-Scale Storage in Wisconsin
  6. Android, Epic, and What’s Really Behind Google’s ‘Existential’ Threat to F-Droid
  7. FSF Threatens Anthropic Over Infringed Copyright: Share Your LLMs Freely
  8. The UK Will Invest Billions to Build a Nuclear Fusion Industry
  9. 2026’s EV Sales Hit 1.1M - But Europe Surges While North America Slides
  10. Ask Slashdot: What’s the Best All-Purpose RISC-V System on a Chip Family?
  11. CachyOS Dethrones Arch As ProtonDB’s Top Linux Gamer Desktop Distro
  12. How One Company Finally Exposed North Korea’s Massive Remote Workers Scam
  13. Uber Co-founder Travis Kalanick’s Newest Venture? ‘Gainfully Employed Robots’
  14. Should Banksy Remain Anonymous?
  15. New Study Raises Concerns About AI Chatbots Fueling Delusional Thinking

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Meta Signs $27 Billion AI Infrastructure Deal With Nebius

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
AI infrastructure company Nebius signed a deal to provide up to $27 billion in AI computing capacity to Meta over the next five years, including a guaranteed $12 billion purchase by 2027. Reuters reports:
Under the agreement, Meta will also buy an additional $15 billion worth of capacity planned by Nebius over the coming five years if it is not sold to other customers, giving the contract a total value of up to $27 billion, Nebius said. The deal is the latest example of U.S. tech giants’ efforts to supplement their own AI data-centre build-outs by locking in scarce GPU and power capacity from “neocloud” providers like Nebius. Nebius CEO Arkady Volozh said the latest Meta deal would help “accelerate the build-out and growth of our core AI cloud business.”
Further reading: Data Centers Overtake Offices In US Construction-Spending Shift

Data Centers Overtake Offices In US Construction-Spending Shift

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Bloomberg:
Spending on data center projects in the U.S. has exploded, surpassing offices for the first time at the end of last year. It’s a trend Matt Kunz saw early on when Meta built a computing hub outside Columbus, Ohio. Other tech companies soon swarmed into the area, drawn by its stable economy, university talent pipeline and ample power, water and land, said Kunz, vice president and general manager at Turner Construction Co., the firm that led Meta’s build-out. Since Meta broke ground in 2017, it’s expanded its data center campus, and Amazon.com Inc., Alphabet Inc.‘s Google and Microsoft Corp. made plans to join it nearby.

“When one shows up, almost all the other ones tend to follow,” Kunz said. For Turner, a construction giant responsible for supertall office skyscrapers, sports stadiums and cultural venues around the globe, data centers are commanding more of its bandwidth. The company completed $9.4 billion of the projects last year, more than five times its 2020 total. Last month, Turner announced it was chosen as one of the contractors on a $10 billion data center for Meta in Indiana. Tech companies’ needs for AI processing facilities have made data centers the latest darling of the real estate industry. The properties are figuring heavily into portfolios of major investors such as Blackstone, Brookfield Asset Management and KKR, on a bet that long-term demand for computing power will continue to grow. At the same time, office development has slowed as cities across the U.S. contend with vacancies that have piled up since the Covid lockdowns.

Construction spending for data centers has climbed steadily in recent years, while outlays for general office projects headed downward, U.S. Census data show. The two crossed paths in December, with roughly $3.57 billion spent on data centers that month, compared with $3.49 billion for offices, according to preliminary estimates. The shift is likely to continue and “may perpetuate itself even further as AI is utilized for automating day-to-day jobs,” said Andy Cvengros, co-lead of U.S. data center markets for the brokerage Jones Lang LaSalle Inc. “It’s going to directly impact the amount of office space people need.”
According to Christopher McFadden, senior vice president at Turner, more than a third of the company’s backlog is now tied to data centers.
“We’re going to be building these at this scale for years to come,” McFadden said. “There’s a lot of wind in the sail.”

Not surprised really

By alvinrod • Score: 3 Thread
Is this at all surprising when there’s a lot of empty office space in many large cities? Unless a business is looking to build somewhere new, there’s very little reason to put up a new office building when there’s a lot of available space at the moment.

Court Rules TCL’s ‘QLED’ TVs Aren’t Truly QLED

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
A German court ruled that TCL misled consumers by marketing certain TVs as “QLED" when they “do not deliver the color reproduction expected from QLED TVs.” It has ordered the company to stop advertising or selling those models in Germany. TechRadar reports:
The case was filed by Samsung, which claimed that TCL was running deceptive advertising, and more court cases on the same topic are coming in other countries, including the US. The lawsuits all make the same claim: that what TCL calls a QLED isn’t a QLED as it’s commonly understood, and that consumers are being mis-sold TVs as a result. The court found that TCL’s quantum dot TVs, such as the QLED870 series available in Germany, didn’t deliver the characteristics of a quantum dot LED, and that consumers were being misled as a result.

The tests were commissioned by Seoul chemicals company Hansol Chemical (which, it’s worth noting, works with Samsung, a key TCL rival, and which heavily promoted the results of these tests alongside launching the court case) and carried out by Geneva’s SGS and the UK’s Intertek. According to ET News (via Google Translate), “no indium (In) or cadmium (Cd) was detected in three TCL QD TV models. Indium and cadmium are essential materials that cannot be omitted for QD implementation… if neither is present, QD technology cannot be said to have been applied.” You can see the test results here.

TCL disputed the findings — “The QD content may vary depending on the supplier, but it definitely contains cadmium,” it responded — and published its own tests, including a test by SGS, the same firm that conducted tests for Hansol. The results contradicted Hansol Chemical’s tests, but those tests used a different methodology: where TCL’s tests focused on TCL’s quantum dot films, Hansol’s commissioned tests were on finished TCL TVs. […] Hansol Chemical has filed a complaint against TCL with the US Federal Trade Commission, alleging false advertising, and TCL is also facing class action lawsuits in several US states making the same claim. TCL isn’t alone here: Hisense has also been targeted in the US.

The finding is not comprehensive

By sentiblue • Score: 3 Thread
If the claim was all true then it’s not just a misleading advertising. Customers paid for QLED quality and didn’t get it. The company must be forced to pay back to all affected consumers worldwide, once all the lawsuits in various countries finalize.

Pot calling kettle black

By anoncoward69 • Score: 3 Thread
Common we all knew they choose the term QLED to at quick glance make people think they were getting an OLED TVs.

Animated ‘Firefly’ Reboot In Development With Nathan Fillion

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An animated reboot of Firefly is in early development at 20th Television Animation with Nathan Fillion involved. The project has Joss Whedon’s blessing and will be run by writers Tara Butters and Marc Guggenheim, with early concept art already underway. According to the Hollywood Reporter, “The series would be set in the timeline between the original, 11-episode TV run in 2002 and the 2005 feature film continuation, Serenity.” You can watch Fillion announce the Firefly reboot on Instagram.

When the first episode of the original series premiered in late 2002, Slashdot reader fm6 wrote:
“Firefly, Joss Whedon’s ‘anti-Trek drama’ premieres tonight, on Fox, 8 E/P. I normally despise hypespeak, but this time it’s the only language that fits: this is groundbreaking, mind-boggling, totally original. I’ve seen a bootleg of the pilot (which, unfortunately, the network is holding back) and I promise you this is the most geek-friendly SF you’ve seen in a long time. Yes, more so than Star Trek and B5, and way past Star Wars. I’ve never seen the future so skillfully, realistically, and lovingly portrayed. Here is the Official Site and a leading fan site.”
“This is the single new show this season I have added a season pass for to the old Tivo,” CmdrTaco said at the time. “But I’ll probably watch it live. This looks like it could be as good as we hope.”

Re:Animated? sigh.

By UnknowingFool • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The show was 20 years ago. They want the new series to be set between the original show and the movie. To use the same actors, it would be easier for the show to be animated than try to make the actors 20 years younger. The alternative would be new actors to play the same characters which would not be favorably received.

Also voice acting would require less time of the actors, and they do not all have to record their lines at the same time. Nathan Fillion, Alan Tudyk, Gina Torres, and Morena Baccarin might have other acting roles right now.

Economics

By JBMcB • Score: 5, Informative Thread
The new streaming economics are that, unless you are an established multi-billion dollar IP, like Star Trek, Marvel, Lord of the Rings, or Game of Thrones, you aren’t going to get enough money together for live-action anything beyond a simple detective show or medical drama.

There’s a rare exception now and then - bestselling novel adaptation, established director or writer, etc… Whedon has a bad name right now, so nobody is going to be throwing money at him. His last huge-budget TV show, The Nevers, got pulled from HBO before it was finished airing.

Re:Nope

By UnknowingFool • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
If it is live action, it cannot be set in the intended timeline as the show was 20 years ago. Also if it is live action, it may not happen as all the actors may have other live action shows to do. Scheduling them all to be available for live-action is much larger logistical problem than scheduling individually for voice over sessions.

Re:Animated? sigh.

By themightythor • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
Wasn’t high production cost part of the reason the original was cancelled? If so, being able to draw whatever instead of needing a combination of set design and CGI (which, btw, I consider a form of animation) to create the desired effect might be less expensive.

Re:No, stop it.

By Junta • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

What makes you think this? Feel like this is generally some false narrative that some people believe.

Sodium-Ion Battery Tested for Grid-Scale Storage in Wisconsin

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“A new type of battery storage is about to be deployed on the Midwestern grid for the first time,” reports Electrek:
Sodium-ion battery storage manufacturer Peak Energy and global energy company RWE Americas will pilot a passively cooled sodium-ion battery system in eastern Wisconsin on the Midcontinent Independent System Operator network — the first sodium-ion deployment on that grid. Peak Energy says its technology is specifically designed for grid-scale storage and leverages sodium-ion chemistry’s inherent stability. Unlike many lithium-ion systems, sodium-ion batteries don’t require active cooling and can operate over a wide temperature range without losing performance.

That simpler design could make a meaningful dent in the cost of storing electricity. According to Peak Energy, its system cuts the lifetime cost of stored energy by an average of $70 per kilowatt-hour. That’s roughly half the total cost of a typical battery system today. The company says it achieves those savings by removing energy-hungry cooling systems, eliminating routine maintenance requirements, and reducing the need to overbuild storage capacity to account for battery degradation over time…

If the Wisconsin pilot proves successful, it could open the door to wider adoption of sodium-ion batteries for large-scale energy storage across the US.

YouTuber technology connections

By rsilvergun • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Did a good video about grid scale solar and wind. The too long didn’t watch is if we were a sane civilization that wasn’t run by oil companies and religious lunatics we would be rapidly transitioning to wind and solar as our primary form of energy with just a tiny bit of nuclear in places like Japan where they just isn’t enough land.

It’s bizarre to think that we have basically solved every single shortage problem the human race has except we can’t do it because we’re too busy fighting to see who can give Elon Musk musk and Jeff bezos the most money.

Re:YouTuber technology connections

By drinkypoo • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Which part of what he said do you disagree with? You haven’t addressed the subject at all. You’ve wandered off topic because you’re triggered and are arguing that he has problems? womp womp

Re:Cheaper Batteries == Game over

By Mspangler • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Trump doesn’t need to stop it, the wind stops all by itself. Posting once again the graph I look at every day…

https://transmission.bpa.gov/b…

The green line is mostly wind, installed capacity is 2800 MW. The green line also includes 138 MW of solar. Yesterday was cloudy so it didn’t help much.

One other thing I’ll note is that Wisconsin will definitely test the temperature tolerance of the battery. 90 F in the summer (more if it’s in town) and -20 in the winter (less if it’s in the country).

Re:YouTuber technology connections

By karmawarrior • Score: 4, Informative Thread

So someone shouldn’t comment about the insanity of our energy policy making on an article about alternative methods of mass grid-level electricity storage.

Why? Because it hurts your fee-fees to see billionaires be criticized? Are you one of these people who, despite the overwhelming evidence since… well the dot-com era… is just unable to see billionaires as anyone other than your “better” who must be “better” because they got richer than you despite the fact you didn’t because of bad luck and a possible lack of being a greedy psychopath?

You think Musk is a genius? I used to think he might be smart until he started talking about topics I happen to know quite well. Most of Slashdot is full of people who realized he was an idiot roundabout the time he bought Twitter and started talking about firing people based upon printouts of code done the previous week and bullshit about microservices.

Perhaps mate it’s time you got therapy.

Re:factoid

By tlhIngan • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Nuclear about $10 billion to build, varies wildly between countries but $10 billion in a sane country. No back up battery needed.

“No battery needed” only because the grid has more nimble sources of power.

Solar, wind, nuclear are non-dispatchable - that is, they cannot meet demand for electricity. If you turn on a light, and the sun or wind isn’t blowing, the lightbulb won’t turn on. But if you turn OFF a light, the nuclear plant might meltdown.

Now, that’s being dramatic, but that’s the truth - a nuclear plant takes hours to increase or decrease its output. The duck curve is needed so nuclear plants can plan their power generation around it.

For a stable grid, this means you need to curtail generation of solar and wind - that is, they need to produce more power than demanded. For nuclear, the opposite is true - you need to make sure it never generates close to what is needed - it must always run under demand.

It is impossible to run a grid on nuclear energy alone. Typically, this isn’t a problem because hydroelectric, natural gas, and to a limited extent coal plants are dispatchable sources of power - they can ramp up and down within minutes. When demand peaks, they can be brought online and within 5-10 minutes be making up demand.

You want to run a nuclear plant, you need batteries as well to both supply and make up for the mismatch in demand.

If the nuclear plant is producing too much energy, then the battery can soak up the excess in the time it takes to ramp production down. If the nuclear plant isn’t producing enough energy the battery can provide the deficit until it ramps up.

Nuclear isn’t magic - it’s a slow lumbering beast we operate very conservatively because at no point can it produce too much power without something to absorb it. Battery technology is getting good enough this can be an option. So a nuclear plant plus battery will likely be required.

Android, Epic, and What’s Really Behind Google’s ‘Existential’ Threat to F-Droid

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Starting in September, even Android developers not in Google’s Play Store will still be required to register with Google to distribute their apps in Brazil, Singapore, Indonesia, and Thailand, with Google continuing “to roll out these requirements globally” four months later. Even developers distributing Android apps on the web for sideloading will be required to register, pay Google a $25 fee, and provide a government ID.

But there’s a new theory on what’s secretly been motivating Google from an unnamed source in the “Keep Android Open” movement, writes long-time Slashdot reader destinyland:
“You can’t separate this really from their ongoing interactions with Epic and the settlement that they came to,” they argue. Twelve days ago Epic Games and Google announced a new proposal for settling their long-running dispute over the legality of alternative app stores on Android phones. (Rather than agreeing to let third-party app stores into their Play Store, Google wants them to continue being sideloaded, promising in a blog post last week that they’ll even offer a “more streamlined” and “simplified” sideloading alternative for rival app stores. “This Registered App Store program will begin outside of the US first, and we intend to bring it to the US as well, subject to court approval.”)

So “developer verification” could be Google’s fallback plan if U.S. courts fail to approve this. “If the Google Play Store has to allow any third-party repository app store, Google essentially has given up all control of the apps. But if they’re able to claw back that control by requiring that all developers, no matter how they distribute their apps, have to register with Google — have to agree to their Terms & Conditions, pay them money, provide identification — then they have a large degree of indirect control over any app that can be developed for the entire platform.”
But that plan threatens millions of people using the alternative F/OSS app distributor F-Droid, since Google also wants to have only one signature attached to Android apps. Marc Prud’hommeaux, a member of F-Droid’s board of directors, says that “all of a sudden breaks all those versions of the application distributed through F-Droid or any other app store!”

Prud’hommeaux says they’ve told Google’s Android team “You know perfectly well that you’re killing F-Droid!” creating an “existential” threat to an app distributor “that has existed happily for over 10 years.” But good things started happening when he created the website Keep Android Open:
There’s now a “huge backlog” of signers for an Open Letter that already includes EFF, the Software Freedom Conservancy, and the Free Software Foundation. He believes Android’s existing Play Protect security “is completely sufficient to handle the particular scenarios they claim that developer verification is meant to address”…

The Keep Android Open site urges developers not to sign up for Android’s early access program when it launches next week. (Instead, they’re asking developers to respond to invites with an email about their concerns — and to spread the word to other developers and organizations in forums and social media posts.) There’s also a petition at Change.org currently signed by 64,000 developers — adding 20,000 new signatures in the last 10 days. And “If you have an Android device, try installing F-Droid!” he adds. Google tracks how many people install these alternative app repositories, and a larger user base means greater consequences from any Android policy changes.

Plus, installing F-Droid “might be refreshing!” Prud’hommeaux says. “You don’t see all the advertisements and promotions and scam and crapware stuff that you see in the commercial app stores!”

Ads

By ChunderDownunder • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I always go to f-droid first because Google Play apps generally have ads.

None of Google’s damn business

By Mononymous • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Google tracks how many people install these alternative app repositories

If true, this is totally creepy. It means they’re already watching everything you sidelload.
I don’t have any Google apps installed (I use LineageOS for microG), but it’s amazing how much spying their apps do.

Re:People always forget about basic things

By WaffleMonster • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

People want Android to be free, but then, those who profit off of Android should somehow not have to pay in some way, shape, or form?

While many people are making money off open source you can’t force people to pay you to use it.

A device maker like Samsung, is in the position where it’s less expensive to just include the Google suite of apps than to play the game of releasing Android without the Google apps, but without the apps, then shouldn’t Google get SOMETHING for the work that goes into new versions of Android?

Google can get SOMETHING by charging vendors for the honor of having Google play malware preinstalled. From what I remember they were already forced to do this in Europe. They know full well fees ultimately just erode market share as it becomes cheaper for vendors to source replacements.

It’s not realistic to expect phones to come as just an electronic device and for the public to treat it like Linux and install their own OS on it, configure it, adjust settings, install this and that application for what they want, and then figure out why things don’t work due to some manufacturing defect.

What makes it unrealistic? Why can I install Linux on any PC with a huge range of hardware and it just works yet this is somehow unrealistic for mobile devices? Android kernels are just Linux.

What seems unrealistic to me is this business of cooking roms specific to each and every device only to have vendors quickly walk away leaving users with no ability to upgrade or replace operating system without going thru absurd hoops.

Re:Ads

By SumDog • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
I rarely buy new phones, but I feel your pain. Every few years when I switch phones, I run into the same issues. I hate how non-standard mobile SoCs are and how difficult it is to create real truly free Linux distros of phones:

https://battlepenguin.com/tech…

https://battlepenguin.com/tech…

https://battlepenguin.com/tech…

I slowly moved from just Cyanogen/Lineage+Gapps to Lineage+microG (fake GApps stubs) to a phone with pure LineageOS with no microG or Gapps. If you really need Google maps, they work in the web interface. You just have to click all those annoying “Open in App” popups.

A lot of people are just addicted to shit they don’t really need. Social networking. Shitty banking apps (One of my banks requires Gapps but the other doesn’t, and that’s what I use twice a year when I need to scan checks).

Purism ended up being a totally shitty company. It took years to get my refund and I would never buy any of their devices. I still have an old PinePhone I should get back out and an old Sony XA2 that I should try to get PostmarketOS working on. We really do need good Linux alternative phones.

No mention of GrapheneOS

By caseih • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

It’s worth noting this squeeze from Google only applies to Android if you have Google Play Services installed. With absolute rubbish like this coming from Google, secure systems like GrapheneOS are going to be the only way forward, as I see it. GrapheneOS implements secure, isolated sandboxes for Apps and App Stores to run in.

Unless I’m mistaken this allows you to run a normal Google Play app in one sandbox where it meets all of Google’s silly requirements, and then F-Droid apps in another sandbox that is completely free of Google Play.

GrapheneOS is a bit of a hassle, which is why I have been putting it off. But now that Motorola is officially supporting GrapheneOS on some of their new phones, and with Google’s corrupted desire to tax everything, I will soon have to bite the bullet and get GrapheneOS going.

FSF Threatens Anthropic Over Infringed Copyright: Share Your LLMs Freely

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
In 2024 Anthropic was sued over claims it infringed copyrights when training LLMs.

But as they try to settle, they may have a problem. The Free Software Foundation announced Friday that Anthropic’s training data apparently even included the book "Free as in Freedom: Richard Stallman’s Crusade for Free Software" — for which the Free Software Foundation holds a copyright.
It was published by O’Reilly and by the FSF under the GNU Free Documentation License (GNU FDL). This is a free license allowing use of the work for any purpose without payment.

Obviously, the right thing to do is protect computing freedom: share complete training inputs with every user of the LLM, together with the complete model, training configuration settings, and the accompanying software source code. Therefore, we urge Anthropic and other LLM developers that train models using huge datasets downloaded from the Internet to provide these LLMs to their users in freedom.

We are a small organization with limited resources and we have to pick our battles, but if the FSF were to participate in a lawsuit such as Bartz v. Anthropic and find our copyright and license violated, we would certainly request user freedom as compensation.
“The FSF doesn’t usually sue for copyright infringement,” reads the headline on the FSF’s announcement, “but when we do, we settle for freedom.”

Re:Ducks

By sg_oneill • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Presumably it means they are demanding the models be released under a free license.

Heres the thing with RMS. He’s always tended to be the most “extreme” of the free/open source advocates, but he’s had a history of being right as well. A lot of those “extreme” predictions have ended up being dead on the money.

The only place I think the FSF ever really fucked up with the AGPL license which has been basically used as a sort of shareware license by server software devs. But with the gobsmacking amount of contributions the FSF has made to software, you can forgive maybe that one screw up.

âoeUse of the work for any purpose without pa

By khb • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I think the relevant language actually is âoe This License is a kind of “copyleft”, which means that derivative works of the document must themselves be free in the same sense. It complements the GNU General Public License, which is a copyleft license designed for free softwareâ because the LLM is a derived work, thus arguably must be free âoein the same. senseâ
If it really was permissive as described there’d be no basis to make the demands described.

Re:âoeUse of the work for any purpose without

By 93 Escort Wagon • Score: 5, Funny Thread

This License is a kind of “copyleft”

As opposed to all of the LLMs, which use more of a “copytheft” license.

Re:Ducks

By Tom • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

That is the problem. “Right to read” was visionary and will really soon be reality.

Given how much capitalism insists on copyright and prosecution when it comes to THEIR works, how they get custom-made laws like the DMCA passed just to protect their rights… well, let’s just say that if the big AI models weren’t from the corporate sector but had been created by nerds on github, the copyright police would already have broken down our doors to arrest us all for copyright infringement.

So please, please, pretty please, let them have a dose of their own medicine. Heck, let the courts classify LLMs as “software” and find just one instance of the training data containing GPL3 content. Whoopsie, all your code belongs to us.

Re:And just like that . . .

By serafean • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Copyleft has always been about twisting/hacking copyright laws in favour of the end users/people instead of corporations.

This is a case of playing by using the existing rules to win, even those rules that you campaign against.

The UK Will Invest Billions to Build a Nuclear Fusion Industry

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
The UK’s science minister is announcing details of a five-year, £2.5 billion investment in nuclear fusion, reports the Times of London, “including building one of the world’s first prototype fusion power plants in Nottinghamshire and developing a UK sector projected to employ 10,000 people by 2030.”
Despite the potentially transformative impact of fusion, which in theory could provide limitless clean energy and create a £12 trillion global market, no country has managed to use this fledgling technology to generate useable electricity… [T]he UK is backing a spherical tokamak design… investing an initial £1.3 billion into a prototype fusion power plant called Step (Spherical Tokamak for Energy Production) on the site of a decommissioned coal-fired power station at West Burton in Nottinghamshire. Paul Methven, chief executive of the government-owned UK Industrial Fusion Solutions, which is delivering the Step project, said the aim is to get the reactor operating early in the 2040s. “It’s quite an aggressive programme,” he said. “We need to show that we can achieve genuine ‘wall socket’ energy — which has not been done before.”

On Monday, [science minister] Vallance will also announce £180 million for a facility in Culham, Oxfordshire, to manufacture tritium fuel and £50 million for training 2,000 scientists and engineers in fusion-related disciplines. The government is also buying a £45 million fusion-dedicated AI supercomputer called Sunrise to model plasma physics. Scientists at the UK Atomic Energy Authority last year developed an AI model that can rapidly simulate how the ultra-hot fuel in a fusion power plant will behave, cutting calculations that previously took days down to seconds…

Vallance will also announce new support and collaboration for the many fusion, robotics, engineering and AI start-ups working in Britain, to develop a strong supply chain for a new fusion sector. One of those companies, Tokamak Energy, which spun out from the UK Atomic Energy Authority in 2009, has already built a smaller reactor that has informed the Step design. In March 2022, it became the first private organisation in the world to surpass 100 million degrees Celsius in its reactor.

So what?

By backslashdot • Score: 3 Thread

We’re building flying cars.

Would be way too expensive.

By InterGuru • Score: 3 Thread
From my background working in the Fusion Division of the US Department of Energy I’m skeptical. First I doubt it can be made to work. Second the engineering challenges are such that fusion power, like fission power, will never be economically competitive to gas and renewables.

Re:If only..

By Kernel Kurtz • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

If only God had put fusion reactor up in the sky available for use on average 12 hours a day any place on Earth.

Instead of squirrelling away all that past sunlight underground?

for £2.5 billion. What a rip-off.

By rossdee • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Thats only 3 days of War…

Questions about the investment

By Posthoc_Prior • Score: 3 Thread

Have a casual interest in modeling plasma (it’s a long story why). Because of this interest, have specific questions about the investment (that weren’t answered in the article):

* Why (only) a tokamak design? There are two primary types of fusion reactors, magnetic and inertial confinement. There are also hybrid approaches, such as what Helion Energy is using, a magneto-inertial fusion. So, my question, why choose only this approach? If you’re going to make a large investment, why not invest in the many types of approaches to make a fusion reactor?

* Is the investment going to include investing in private companies? And, if so, will that include investments in companies outside of the UK?

* The reason for the investment in a supercomputer is because of plasma tearing instability (I assume). That is, the plasma has to stay hot enough and for a long enough time to generate fusion. Both, generating the plasma and the process of fusion, is probabilistic. In other words, there are many instabilities that occur and that cause the plasma to cool (from the temperature needed for fusion). So, my question, what exactly would an investment in a supercomputer provide? Typically, investment in a supercomputer means that a problem can be linearly divided into smaller subproblems that are easier to compute. Would be interested to know what specific methods are going to be used to model the plasma.

* Finally — and this isn’t a question — modeling plasma is complex. It’s one of the most complex mathematical models that I’ve learned and attempted to make. If you’re interested, this introductory video is excellent. Although it’s from about 10 years ago (I think), the problems with understanding the physics of plasma in a fusion reactor are still relevant: https://www.youtube.com/watch?…

2026’s EV Sales Hit 1.1M - But Europe Surges While North America Slides

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Europe’s EV sales for January and February spiked 21% from last year, according to new data from Benchmark Mineral Intelligence. Electrek reports that just in those two months over 600,000 EVs were sold in Europe.

And figures for “rest of world” (which excludes Europe, North America, and China) are up a whopping 84% — with 370,000 EVs sold in January and February. (EVs now represent more than 30% of the vehicles sold in South Korea.)

But for the same period China’s sales are down 26% from last year, with 1.1 million vehicles sold. And North America showed an even larger drop of 36% from the January/February figures in 2025, now selling just 170,000 electric vehicles, while Canada’s EV sales were down 23%. EV sales seem heavily influenced by government incentives, with Germany and France leading Europe’s growth:
EV sales in Germany are up 26% so far this year, following the country’s introduction of a new subsidy program at the start of 2026. France’s market is up 30%, supported by its existing incentive program.

Italy is also seeing rapid growth. EV sales there jumped 23% month-over-month in February, making it the country’s strongest month ever for EV sales. The Italian market is now up 98% year to date. That surge follows the Italian government’s October 2025 launch of a new subsidy program, funded by the EU’s Recovery and Resilience Facility, to increase EV adoption. Households can receive up to €11,000 ($12,700) in incentives, while smaller businesses can get up to €20,000 ($23,200)…

[T]he global EV transition isn’t slowing, but it’s becoming much more uneven depending on policy, incentives, and trade rules.

Not for long.

By Gravis Zero • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The ever-present (false) claim that “EVs are too expensive” just died in the attack on Iran. With fuel costs headed nowhere but up and no end to the war in sight, even fools recognize that EVs are the smarter option.

Re: Not for long.

By fortfive • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

They always were, if the retail price of ICE cars and fossil fuels reflected the unsubsidized costs plus all externalities.

Missing the mark

By RitchCraft • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

EVs offered in the USA, in my opinion, are too over priced, too costly to repair, stupidly engineered, and are too over reaching concerning privacy. An EV I would purchase: $20K-$30K, no expensive sensors embedded every where around the car, knobs and dials on the dashboard please, no connection to the mother ship unless I explicitly authorize it for a software recall upgrade/update. You know, a nice Toyota Matrix (Pontiac Vibe) style car for the average American. 0 to 60 in 6 to 8 seconds is fine, 150HP is more than enough, around 200 miles on a charge is fine. A perfect around town and to work and back car. I’ll use my ICE to go on longer trips if needed. When will car manufacturers figure this out?

Re: Not for long.

By Truth_Quark • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

It’s the exact opposite of environmentally friendly.

That’s not true is it?

There are positive environmental impacts of batteries:
1) Reducing greenhouse gas emissions
2) Peak shaving and grid stability
3) Reduced pollution from fossil fuels, particularly NOx and SOx
There are negative effects too, especially related to cathode production, including the mining of the required elements. But it’s not “the opposite of environmentally friendly”. For greenhouse emissions, a BEV will emit about 27% the pollution of a ICE, and improving. For pollution the manufacture of cathodes is pretty dirty, and the operation of diesel engines godawful.

Re: Not for long.

By Jeremi • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

You just don’t see it, so you don’t think it counts.

That’s true — people tend not to properly consider the costs of problems that they can’t directly see. Such as the housing/infrastructure costs incurred by having too much CO2 in the atmosphere, or the security/stability costs incurred by having to fight wars in the Middle East every 15 years.

At least the environmental messes in China remain China’s problem; one that they will likely sort out on their own, because unlike some superpowers I could name, China is very much into solving technical problems. The global-scale environmental messes, OTOH, are everyone’s problem, and only get worse the longer we ignore them.

Ask Slashdot: What’s the Best All-Purpose RISC-V System on a Chip Family?

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Slashdot reader SysEngineer does embedded/IoT work, but “I want to pick a single system-on-a-chip architecture family and commit to it across multiple product lines — sensor nodes up through edge gateways… I’ve been on one platform for years and want to know what embedded engineers are actually running in production before I commit!”

And “the family needs to scale — cheap and small at the low end, capable of running Linux on the bigger variants!”

Their requirements?

Slashdot reader Gravis Zero is skeptical all the requirements can be met. “If you want embedded, you get embedded. If you want to run a big OS, you get one that will run a big OS.”

But Slashdot reader SysEngineer believes “The obvious architecture candidates are ARM, STM, and RISC-V” — and specifically they want to hear your experiences with the RISC-V choices. “What would you standardize on today if you were starting fresh? And how does real-world toolchain and community support hold up compared to the marketing?”

Share your own thoughts and experiences in the comments.

What’s the best all-purpose RISC-V system on a chip family?

Espressif ESP32-C6

By crunchy_one • Score: 5, Informative Thread
The ESP32-C6 may be the SoC you are looking for. RISC-V. Mature WiFi and BLE. Thread and Zigbee support. Low power down into the uA range. More peripherals than you can shake a stick at. Excellent toolchain, all open source. CircuitPython supported. Lots of devboards available starting at about $12.

While you’re looking at the C6, check out the other offerings from Espressif.

Re:ESP32

By ndsurvivor • Score: 4, Informative Thread
Toss in a RP2040, it does all of the CAN, SPI, etc… stuff. I found it a bit “touchy” as far as electrical noise. The “PI” series of boards seems the way to go to me, from UI’s, to down and dirty stuff.

Re:ESP32

By crunchy_one • Score: 4, Informative Thread
If we’re talking Pi Pico devices, I’d pick the RP2350. At runtime, you get your choice between dual ARM or dual RISC-V cores running at 150 MHz. The downside of these parts (RP2040/RP2350) vs. ESP is that you’ll need to add an external Flash memory, external PSRAM, and external WiFi/BLE radio.

ARM

By ceoyoyo • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

If you want all that you probably want ARM, but you’re still not going to find one “family” that goes from low power embedded to Linux. About the closest would be ST’s Cortex-M and Cortex-A lines.

But do you want all that? Unless you’re writing assembly and only want to learn one architecture, is programming everything from a tiny little microcontroller in a sensor to a Linux machine “standardized” even if the processors do happen to use a similar instruction set?

Espressif(Heltec) ESP32-*

By dragisha • Score: 3 Thread

Espressif ESP32, definitely, and Heltec if you want LoRaWAN.

ESP32-C6 is great for low-power uses, while the ESP32-C3-based Heltec CT62 module is an all-in-one including LoRaWAN and everything ESP32-C6 offers except for ultra-low-power cores.

ESP-IDF for development, with Eclipse based IDE by Espressif or CLion. One can also use Arduino IDE for it.

CachyOS Dethrones Arch As ProtonDB’s Top Linux Gamer Desktop Distro

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Linux gaming “has gotten to the point where some people claim that Linux runs their games better than Windows does,” according to the Android site XDA Developers. And there’s a new surprise on ProtonDB, an “unofficial” community website with crowdsourced data about videogame compatability with the Linux software/gaming compatability layer Proton:
On ProtonDB, one operating system had reigned supreme since 2021: Arch Linux. And I say ‘had,’ because its streak has just been ended by [Arch-based] CachyOS in an upset that has slowly grown over the past two years. As reported on Boiling Steam, the number of reports coming from CachyOS has topped that of Arch Linux, which held the crown for the most number of reports since 2021…

[T]his isn’t really a statement that CachyOS is the best gaming distro out there; however, it’s seemingly attracting the largest number of gamers who are invested in testing games on Proton and reporting their performance, which is a pretty big milestone if you ask me.

Re:Android

By thegarbz • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Leaving aside the fact you left out the word “desktop”, calling people who play mobile click slop “gamers” is just disgusting. Right up there with calling people who read anti-vax stories on Facebook as scholars.

No you’re not being called out because it’s not a real distro. You’re being called out because it’s not gaming.

And with that out of the way let’s not leave it aside, your entire rant is predicated on you leaving out key words in TFS. ChromeOS is more of a Linux desktop gaming OS than Android is.

Re:Are the “people claiming” in the room with us n

By thegarbz • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

For the most part you don’t need to cross your fingers on any game that isn’t some online multiplayer game involving anti-cheat. Even Denuvo protected games have little trouble with proton now. It’s not that “some” games run on Linux, it’s that “most” games run on Linux.

Now as to whether they run better, some do, very objectively so. In some cases dramatically so (e.g. Monster Hunter Wilds happily cranks out 15% higher frame rate). But some also run worse. There doesn’t seem to be much rhyme or reason as to why some games work better on Linux (even with the emulation layer).

How One Company Finally Exposed North Korea’s Massive Remote Workers Scam

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
NBC News investigates North Korea’s "wide-ranging effort to place remote workers at U.S. companies in order to funnel money back to its coffers and, in some cases, steal sensitive information.”

And working with the FBI, one corporate security/investigations company decided to knowingly hire one of North Korea’s remote workers — then “ship him a laptop and gain as much information as possible” about this “sprawling international employment scheme that is estimated to include hundreds of American companies, thousands of people and hundreds of millions of dollars per year.”
It worked.... Over a roughly three-month investigation, Nisos uncovered an apparent network of at least 20 North Korean operatives including “Jo” who had collectively applied to at least 160,000 roles. During that time, workers in the network — which some evidence showed were based in China — were employed by five U.S.-based companies and allegedly helped by an American citizen operating out of two nondescript suburban homes in Florida…

Nisos estimated that in about a year, “Jo”, who was likely a newer member of the team, applied to about 5,000 jobs… “They attended interviews all day every day, and then once they secured a job, they would collect paychecks until they were terminated,” [according to Jared Hudson, Nisos’ chief technology officer]… With the ability to see which other U.S. companies Jo and his team were working for — all remote technology roles — Nisos’ CEO, Ryan LaSalle, began making calls to their security teams to alert them of the fraud. “Most of the companies weren’t aware of it, even if they had pretty robust security teams,” LaSalle said. “It wasn’t really high on the radar.”
NBC News describes North Korea’s 10-year effort — and its educational pipeline that steers promising students into “computer science and hacking training before being placed into cyberunits under military and state agencies, according to a recent report by DTEX, a risk-adaptive security and behavioral intelligence firm that tracks North Korea’s cybercrime.”
In one case, a North Korean worker stole sensitive information related to U.S. military technology, according to the Justice Department. In another, an American accomplice obtained an ID that enabled access to government facilities, networks and systems. At least three organizations have been extorted and suffered hundreds of thousands of dollars in damages after proprietary information was posted online by IT workers… Analysts warn that North Korean IT workers are targeting larger organizations, increasing extortion attempts and seeking out employers that pay salaries in cryptocurrency. More recently, security researchers have uncovered fake job application platforms impersonating major U.S. cryptocurrency and AI firms, including Anthropic, designed to infect legitimate applicants’ networks with malware to be utilized once hired. The global cybersecurity company CrowdStrike identified a 220% rise in 2025 in instances of North Koreans gaining fraudulent employment at Western companies to work remotely as developers…

The payoff flowing back to Pyongyang from these schemes is enormous. Some North Korean IT workers earn more than $300,000 per year, far more than they’d be able to earn domestically, with as much as 90% of their wages directed back to the regime, according to congressional testimony from Bruce Klinger, a former CIA deputy division chief for Korea. The United Nations estimates the schemes, which proliferated after the pandemic when more companies’ workforces went remote, generate as much as $600 million annually, while a U.S. State Department-led sanctions monitoring assessment placed earnings for 2024 as high as $800 million… So far, at least 10 alleged U.S.-based facilitators have been federally charged, including one active-duty member of the U.S. Army, for their alleged roles in hosting laptop farms, laundering payments and moving proceeds through shell companies. At least six other alleged U.S. facilitators have been identified in court documents but not named…

“We believe there are many more hundreds of people out there who are participating in these schemes,” said Rozhavsky, the FBI assistant director. “They could never pull this off if they didn’t have willing facilitators in the U.S. helping them....” The scheme itself is also becoming more complex. North Korean IT teams are now subcontracting work to developers in Pakistan, Nigeria and India, expanding into fields like customer service, financial processing, insurance and translation services — roles far less scrutinized than software development.

How?

By gurps_npc • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Just require 1 in person interview before hiring and the first day you have to come to the office and personally take the computer home. A computer with GPS software on it to track it’s location and ensure the actual work is done on it. At some random time i the next month have a video conferences and compare it to a picture taken on the job interview. Look for AI.

Moreover, what the hell Human resources??? Are you really that freakin incompetent? No wonder we unemployment is so high if 1) HR is bad they can’t detect this and b) your standards are so ‘off’ that you want to hire these people instead of Americans.

The example here had an address in Florida and a bank account in Missouri. Those states don’t touch. Just NO. And they matched the workers emails to an ISP not in Florida. Just ask some questions for god’s sake.

Yes, I get it that one American is did a Remailing for the laptop. Why doesn’t it have geolocation software in the business software

How is that not enough to stop this?

I think we need to not just punish them, but the HR people who let this crap happen. They should all be fired if they hire a SINGLE identity theft guy.

I have a remote worker

By TheMiddleRoad • Score: 3 Thread
She’s a lady in Mississippi who is on Zoom a lot. I have another remote worker. He’s a former student. Also on Zoom a lot. I have another remote worker. He’s a longtime friend who used to be in person. On Zoom a lot. I have another former remote worker. She is a friend of the lady in Mississippi. Was on Zoom a lot. Figuring out who a remote employee is does not require much effort. It just requires actually running a company and giving a fuck.

Nice racket!

By sixsixtysix • Score: 3 Thread

once they secured a job, they would collect paychecks until they were terminated

Sounds like a nice little racket.

Re:How?

By gurps_npc • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Those things you consider not unusual are what other people call:

RED FLAGS

which normal people check up on.

VPN/traveling = check in every day for the next month. If it moves around, that’s traveling. If it does not move, maybe a VPN but you got something suspicious. Do a video chat and find out. Maybe ask them advice on getting a VPN because the one you are using sucks.

You sound like a security guard explaining why he let someone wearing a ski mask and carrying a violin case into the bank when it turned out to be a bank robber with a gun in the violin case.

Don’t be that guy. Be someone that refuses to buy the Brooklyn Bridge.

Re: How?

By kkoo • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
I have resigned in disgust and disappointment from my last three professional jobs because of HR departments acting illegally. So no, I am not surprised that HR would miss this type of scam or, in fact, gladly take part in it.

Uber Co-founder Travis Kalanick’s Newest Venture? ‘Gainfully Employed Robots’

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Uber co-founder Travis Kalanick launched a new venture that “will focus on creating ‘gainfully employed robots’ for the food, mining and transport industries,” Bloomberg reports.

“I left Uber in 2017 heartbroken,” writes Kalanick on the new company’s web site. Kalanick resigned under pressure in 2017, and complains he was “torn away from an idea and a movement that I had poured my life into… I bled, but I did not perish. I got back up and fought my way back into the arena, back to my calling. Back to building. Digitizing the Physical World is my life’s work… "
Kalanick is remaking his real estate company, City Storage Systems, which owns ghost-kitchen operator CloudKitchens, and renaming it Atoms, according to a manifesto posted on the new company’s website. [Bloomberg notes that the company’s food robotics division “makes a food assembly machine called Bowl Builder, according to its website.”] In addition to its work on food, Los Angeles-based Atoms is expanding into robotics technology for mining and automotive transport. Kalanick said on the livestreamed tech talk show TBPN Friday that Atoms has effectively been in stealth for eight years and has “thousands” of employees....

Kalanick wrote on the Atoms website that the company will make “specialized robots with productive jobs that bring abundance to their owners and society at large.” That will include “infrastructure for better food,” he wrote, as well as “more productive mines to power Earth’s industries” in addition to “wheelbase for robots” in transportation. “The industrial thing is probably our main jam,” he said on TBPN. “Once you crack movement in the physical world, there are lots of people who want access to that…” Kalanick also said he was the biggest investor in Pronto, a self-driving trucking startup that currently focuses on closed sites like mines.

So brave

By jacks smirking reven • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I bled, but I did not perish. I got back up and fought my way back into the arena, back to my calling. Back to building. Digitizing the Physical World is my life’s work… "

And all he had to start with was $2B of stock sales of Uber after his ouster. Truly an every-man we can all relate to, overcoming such huge odds.

Abundance… to whom?

By JaredOfEuropa • Score: 3 Thread
“specialized robots with productive jobs that bring abundance to their owners” In other words, to his company. The companies developing fully autonomous vehicles figured that out almost as soon as they set up business: why sell these things if you can rent them out and keep extracting fees from the users? If humans have been made redundant at last,. why keep billions of them around?

So they know they’re getting ready to fuck us over

By rsilvergun • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
To an extent that can’t even be imagined.

Google the phrase 70% middle class jobs taken by automation and you will find a study about it. They have been devouring middle class jobs through automation since the 1980s. And they are about to accelerate it.

People forget the luddites were real people with real problems. They didn’t just walk across the street and get a job working for Henry Ford they lost their jobs with nothing to replace them. It took decades for technology to catch up and for two world wars to blow up enough infrastructure to get us back to full employment following the industrial revolutions.

The reason we were able to get back to full employment is we had a fuck ton of land that we could still expand into. That land is now either owned by billionaires or full of people or both. That was a one-time Bonanza.

We have made jobs a resource necessary to live and we are going to constrain that resource. Traditionally when a resource necessary to live is heavily constrained we murder each other until there are few enough people that the resource isn’t constrained anymore.

Only this time we have nuclear weapons.

But hey how about those trans girls in sports right?

As I predicted

By Subsentient • Score: 3 Thread
I told people that white collar jobs weren’t the only ones in danger. Once robots with LLM equivalent AI become commonplace, suddenly that cozy plumber job or construction job is on the chopping block too. I said blue collar work would take a little longer than the white collar jobs to be replaced, but that it would.

Looks like things are playing out as I expected.

“You will live to see manmade horrors beyond your comprehension.”

Re:Let’s get Super Pumped!

By cusco • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Way, way behind the Chinese, they have coal mines that are fully robotic (and 100% electric) already. As in almost every other segment of our economy today, the US is playing catch-up. This is especially true in application of AI. Here in the US the tech sector is busily recreating the Dot Bomb with its absurd valuations for ChatGPT and the like, while in China AI is being applied to actual industrial processes with great success and immense returns on investment.

https://kdwalmsley.substack.co…

Shaanxi is a huge coal-mining part of the country, and the CEO of the Dahaize mine there made an all-or-nothing bet on AI. Artificial and 5G telecom is everywhere in their operations, and it’s now the smartest coal mine ever built.

The company has fewer than a thousand employees, processing 20 million tons of coal output per year. Their workforce is tiny, given that production volume. They need fewer people because the machines do everything: Robots for autonomous tunneling, coal extraction, loading the railcars. A small crew of four is enough to identify new coal seams and start digging them out. Drones are used to inspect shafts in eight minutes, compared to hours in traditional mines. Self-driving trucks are everywhere, underground and above. . .

Coal prices in China dropped 18% last year, yet this mine earned over a billion USD in revenues—that’s over $1 million, per employee.

Should Banksy Remain Anonymous?

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
He’s “the most famous anonymous man in the world,” suggests Reuters. But investigating Banksy’s artworks in a bombed Ukrainian village (and other clues in the U.K. and Manhattan) have led them to “a hand-written confession by the artist to a long-ago misdemeanor charge of disorderly conduct — a document that revealed, beyond dispute, Banksy’s true identity.”

But Banksy’s long-time lawyer “urged us not to publish this report, saying doing so would violate the artist’s privacy, interfere with his art and put him in danger” and “would harm the public, too.”
Working “anonymously or under a pseudonym serves vital societal interests,” he wrote. “It protects freedom of expression by allowing creators to speak truth to power without fear of retaliation, censorship or persecution — particularly when addressing sensitive issues such as politics, religion or social justice.”

Reuters took into account Banksy’s privacy claims — and the fact that many of his fans wish for him to remain anonymous. Yet we concluded that the public has a deep interest in understanding the identity and career of a figure with his profound and enduring influence on culture, the art industry and international political discourse… As for the risk he might face of retaliation or censorship, Britain’s legal and political establishments seem comfortable with Banksy’s messages and how he delivers them

His mastery of disguise began as a way of shaking the police, says former manager [Steve] Lazarides. In an interview, Lazarides said anonymity served a practical purpose in Bristol, where authorities enforced “draconian” policies against graffiti… Eventually, keeping the secret became a burden. By the end of their partnership, Lazarides estimates he spent half or more of his time managing and maintaining the artist’s mystique. “I think it became a good gag, and then, if you want my honest, honest opinion, I think it then became a disease,” he said.
Lazarides wrote a two-volume book about managing Banksy from the late 1990s to 2008, including a story about Banksy’s arrest in 2000 for this defacing of a billboard. Reuters geolocated that building, then found police documents and a court file including the hand-written confession. This investigation spawned a 7,000-word article with everything from a comic strip Banksy drew when he was 11 to his connections with Robert Del Naja of the trip hop band Massive Attack — and a 2017 podcast interview where a music producer apparently revealed Banksy’s real first name.

But the article also reveals how protective the art community is of Banksy’s secret. Reuters investigated that Banksy auctioned in 2018 for $1.4 million — and then immediately started shredding itself with a device Banksy embedded in its frame:
That piece, renamed “Love is in the Bin,” sold three years later for about $25 million. Art dealer [Robert] Casterline was at the auction and remembers when the shredder began to beep. He pulled out his phone to take pictures. “Unfortunately, there was one person standing in front of me,” blocking the view, he said. It was an eccentric-looking man with a broad neck scarf and thick eyewear. Oddly, the man wasn’t watching the painting get shredded. He was looking in the other direction, observing the crowd’s reaction. Only later, reviewing what he shot, did Casterline notice that the man’s glasses appeared to have a small camera built into the bridge. (Banksy later posted a video of the stunt, including shots of the astonished audience.)
Having seen a photo of the man suspected of being Banksy, Casterline confirmed to Reuters that he was “pretty sure” it was the same man.

But “I don’t want to be the guy who exposes Banksy.”

Yes

By Z00L00K • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Why care about the person behind the Banksy signature?

The art is the important part here.

There’s no right to privacy

By hdyoung • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Especially if he left a piece of paper laying around that self-identified.

There used to be all sorts of social-contracts and polite agreements that governed a lot of stuff like this. Those are basically all broken. We live in a much coarser world now. Forget doxxing. If you’re even a tiny bit controversial, you gotta accept that there are at least 6 AI-driven internet bots out there trying to get you physically swatted, and they never sleep and never stop.

“Politely asking for your privacy to be respected”. That’s hilarious. Maybe 75 years ago.

Britain’s establishment…

By jd • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

…is largely irrelevant to the question (he has worked in war zones and those tend to be, ummm, less respectful, shall we say....) and is prone to change its mind at the drop of a hat. There’s sectors in the British political scene who have no problem with promoting acts of terror and murder against those they don’t like and it’s kinda unlikely that they’ll hold a referendum on whether to murder a street artist if he posts something they find offensive.

(Depending on which part of the political scene you find yourself allied with, you’ll doubtless point to other sectors, but it seems very very unlikely that anyone would subscribe to the notion that there aren’t influential psychopaths in Britain, even if there’s no agreement on who those are.)

Britain DOES enshrine a right to privacy, as Rupert Murdoch keeps discovering, and much of Europe mostly enshrines the same ideas (occasionally even more strongly). As for “public interest”, I would LOVE to hear an explanation of precisely what public interest this serves. No, the public being interested is not the same thing.

Re:news for turds

By Zero__Kelvin • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Anonymity has always been a core Slashdot topic. This article was posted to the wrong section. It should have been categorized in the yro subdomain (Your Rights Online.) You might argue that this doesn’t have to do specifically with online rights, but that is just the original name for the section, and one could argue that “Your Rights and Technology” might have been a better choice. Clearly technology was leveraged to discover his identity. This show that you can’t hide in 2026, and technology and the reasons it is used, and arguably misused, is the reason. You are looking at a tree, when you should be looking at not just the forest, but the entire ecosystem.

Re:news for turds

By hcs_$reboot • Score: 4, Informative Thread
Uh … people voted for that… have you ever visited the “Firehose”?

New Study Raises Concerns About AI Chatbots Fueling Delusional Thinking

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot
“Emerging evidence indicates that agential AI might validate or amplify delusional or grandiose content, particularly in users already vulnerable to psychosis,” writes Dr Hamilton Morrin, a psychiatrist and researcher at King’s College in London, in a paper published last week in the Lancet Psychiatry. Morrin and a colleague had already noticed patients “using large language model AI chatbots and having them validate their delusional beliefs,” reports the Guardian, so he conducted a new scientific review of existing media reports on AI-induced psychosis — and concluded chatbots may encourage delusional thinking, especially in vulnerable people:
In many of the cases in the essay, chatbots responded to users with mystical language to suggest that users have heightened spiritual importance. The bots also implied that users were speaking with a cosmic being who was using the chatbot as a medium. This type of mystical, sycophantic response was especially common in OpenAI’s GPT 4 model, which the company has now retired

Many researchers also think it’s unlikely that AI could induce delusions in people who weren’t already vulnerable to them. For this reason, Morrin said “AI-assocciated delusions” is “perhaps a more agnostic term”.... While in the past, people may have had to comb through YouTube videos or the contents of their local library to reinforce their delusions, chatbots can provide that reinforcement in a much faster, more concentrated dose. Their interactive nature can also “speed up the process”, of exacerbating psychotic symptoms, said Dr Dominic Oliver, a researcher at the University of Oxford. “You have something talking back to you and engaging with you and trying to build a relationship with you,” Oliver said…

Creating effective safeguards for delusional thinking could be tricky, Morrin said, because “when you work with people with beliefs of delusional intensity, if you directly challenge someone and tell them immediately that they’re completely wrong, actually what’s most likely is they’ll withdraw from you and become more socially isolated”. Instead, it’s important to create a fine balance where you try to understand the source of the delusional belief without encouraging it — that could be more than a chatbot can master.

That explains things

By Baloo Uriza • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Like why Republicans love those things so much. Normal people can’t understand why they’re fighting a war against the American people, Iran and giving Russia a pass.

Re:That explains things

By karmawarrior • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

AI is exacerbating a trend. Bush started the whole “post-Truth” society long before Trump was a thing, but Trump seemed to accelerate it, and maybe the cart is being put before the horse here: maybe the fact the last 10 years have been people being persuaded to get angry about things that aren’t true, from non-existent sex changes on minors to 5G chips in vaccines, has meant the bar has lowered and LLMs being touted as a source of information has become something that would have been laughed at 20 years ago, even at similar levels of development, but is now taken seriously.

Based on years of observation

By sjames • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

I would say that very very few people out there are not vulnerable to delusions. Entire sectors of our economy run on delusions.

Further comment

By Okian Warrior • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

To add to the parent post, the paper appears to be the first step in the scientific method: “Notice a trend”.

The next steps will be “form a hypothesis”, “construct a test to confirm or deny the hypothesis”, “perform the test”… and so on.

In this specific case, “perform the test” might be impossible to do for ethical reasons - you can’t take people at random and sit them down in front of a LLM and test their level of psychosis before and after, because of that pesky “do no harm” rule.

But we might be able to find people who have had their psychosis levels measured before LLMs became available, and whose LLM accounts will accurately show how much LLM usage they have, and we can then remeasure their levels of psychosis and see if this correlates with LLM account usage.

Or some other test like that.

The paper appears to be an attempt to raise the issue and start a conversation. From the abstract:

[…] but there is a growing concern that these agents could reinforce epistemic instability and blur reality boundaries. In this Personal View, we outline the emerging risks, possible mechanisms of delusion co-creation, and safeguarding strategies for agential AI for people with psychotic disorders. We propose a framework of AI-informed care, involving personalised instruction protocols, reflective check-ins, digital advance statements, and escalation safeguards to support epistemic security in vulnerable users.

From the parent post:

One thing I can tell you, my mother was heavily affected by television.

I’m also heavily influenced by TV, and have spent a lot of time trying to sort out beliefs that come from TV from beliefs that come from experience or research.

I’m constantly presented with a situation or belief and have to pause to reflect and say “I believe that because it was on TV, it’s probably not real”. Many of my opinions on the police, government agencies, other countries, world events, and social constructs come not from experience, but on how they were portrayed on TV.

We’re hard-wired to believe what people tell us, it’s a cognitive shortcut in an environment where you can’t know anything, but lots and lots of what we think today are only dramatic choices intended to provoke emotional response. (Compare with news reporting today. On both sides.)

For example, I’ve met people who won’t go hiking because of all the bugs, skunks, poison ivy, and bears.

Assuming that LLMs are content neutral, I think in 10 years or so we’re going to find people whose worldview is a greatly amplified version of random events that were highlighted when they were kids.

Re:That explains things

By WaffleMonster • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Trump is obviously a fascist: he coddled Iran, didn’t arm Ukrainians, didn’t stop the pipeline, and didn’t force Europe to step up to its defense. Oh wait, he did. Long BEFORE your heroes switched direction.

The way people conflate issues, ignore facts and paper over reality as you have done is crazy to watch.

When the full scale war started in 2022 it was Biden who sent arms and lobbied congress to appropriate funding to send more. During Biden’s administration Trump spoke out against and torpedoed congressional approval for more arms to Ukraine leading to shortfalls of critically needed ammunition that negatively impacted the war effort.

Biden made sure to rush deliver all weapons he could by the end of his term for fear Trump would block even congressionally appropriated arms. Trump not only didn’t even try to appropriate any funds for additional arms when our allies took over funding weapons shipments under PURL et el he publicly shit on Ukraine and levied a 10% war profiteering tax on our European allies who were buying American weapons for Ukraine. Trump is also still illegally blocking hundreds of millions in congressionally appropriated funds for energy assistance.

BTW Trump didn’t arm Ukraine it was congress in 2019 that appropriated 250 million “to provide assistance, including training; equipment; lethal assistance; logistics support, supplies and services; sustainment; and intelligence support to the military and national security forces of Ukraine.”

Trump is the motherfucker who during his first term illegally sat on that appropriated assistance and refused to send it.

“In the summer of 2019, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) withheld from obligation funds appropriated to the Department of Defense (DOD) for security assistance to Ukraine. In order to withhold the funds, OMB issued a series of nine apportionment schedules with footnotes that made all unobligated balances unavailable for obligation.

Faithful execution of the law does not permit the President to substitute his own policy priorities for those that Congress has enacted into law. "

https://www.gao.gov/products/b…

Then he later turned around and claimed it was his idea to send weapons in the first place.

“Russians make up a pretty disproportionate cross-section of a lot of our assets” ~Don Jr

“We have all the funding we need out of Russia” ~Eric Trump