Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Google Publishes Exploit Code Threatening Millions of Chromium Users
  2. RHEL 10.2 Released With New AI Command Line Assistance
  3. GitHub’s Internal Repos Breached Via Employee’s Use of Malicious VS Code Extension
  4. Anna’s Archive Hit With Global Domain Takedown Order
  5. Seagate Sparks Memory Sell-Off As CEO Says It Would ‘Take Too Long’ To Build New Factories
  6. Yearslong Fight Over Users’ Right To Tweak Smart TV Software Heads To Trial
  7. Regional Winners of Prestigious Literary Prize Suspected of Using Chatbots
  8. Google’s AI Studio Now Lets Anyone Build Android Apps In Minutes
  9. Google Accused of Pushing ‘Free For Life’ G Suite Users Onto Paid Plans
  10. Webb Discovers One of the Universe’s First Galaxies
  11. Minnesota Becomes First State To Ban Prediction Markets
  12. Plex Triples Lifetime Subscription Cost To $750
  13. Google Changes Its Search Box for the First Time in 25 Years
  14. NextEra and Dominion’s $67 Billion Mega-Merger Is All About the Data Centers
  15. OpenAI Co-Founder Andrej Karpathy Joins Anthropic

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Google Publishes Exploit Code Threatening Millions of Chromium Users

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica:
Google on Wednesday published exploit code for an unfixed vulnerability in its Chromium browser codebase that threatens millions of people using Chrome, Microsoft Edge, and virtually all other Chromium-based browsers. The proof-of-concept code exploits the Browser Fetch programming interface, a standard that allows long videos and other large files to be downloaded in the background. An attacker can use the exploit to create a connection for monitoring some aspects of a user’s browser usage and as a proxy for viewing sites and launching denial-of-service attacks. Depending on the browser, the connections either reopen or remain open even after it or the device running it has rebooted.

The unfixed vulnerability can be exploited by any website a user visits. In effect, a compromise amounts to a limited backdoor that makes a device part of a limited botnet. The capabilities are limited to the same things a browser can do, such as visit malicious sites, provide anonymous proxy browsing by others, enable proxied DDoS attacks, and monitor user activity. Nonetheless, the exploit could allow an attacker to wrangle thousands, possibly millions, of devices into a network. Once a separate vulnerability becomes available, the attacker could use it to then compromise all those devices.

“The dangerous part here is that you can just have a lot of different browsers together that you can in the future run something on that you figure out,” said Lyra Rebane, the independent researcher who discovered the vulnerability and privately reported it to Google in late 2022 in an interview. He said using the exploit code Google prematurely published would be “pretty easy,” although scaling it to wrangle large numbers of devices into a single network would require more work. In the thread of Rebane’s disclosure to Google, two developers said in separate responses that it was a “serious vulnerability.” Its severity was rated S1, the second-highest classification.

Since its reporting 29 months ago, the vulnerability remained unknown except to Chromium developers. Then on Wednesday morning, it was published to the Chromium bug tracker. Rebane initially assumed the vulnerability was finally fixed. Shortly thereafter, he learned that, in fact, it remained unpatched. While Google removed the post, it remains available on archival sites, along with the exploit code. Google representatives didn’t immediately respond to an email asking how and why it published the vulnerability and if or when a fix would become available.
The exploit works by abusing Chromium’s Browser Fetch API to open a service worker that remains persistently active. A malicious website can trigger it through JavaScript, creating a connection that can be used “for monitoring some aspects of a user’s browser usage and as a proxy for viewing sites and launching denial-of-service attacks,” reports Ars.

Depending on the browser, those connections “either reopen or remain open even after it or the device running it has rebooted,” effectively turning the device into part of a “limited botnet.”

RHEL 10.2 Released With New AI Command Line Assistance

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Red Hat has released RHEL 10.2 and 9.8 with new AI-assisted command-line tools. The releases also add updated developer toolchains such as Go 1.26, LLVM 21, Rust 1.92, Python 3.14, and PHP 8.4. Phoronix reports:
Red Hat Enterprise Linux has introduced the goose command for power users. Goose is an optional CLI AI assistance with model context protocol (MCP) integration. There is also improved visual output via color output enhancements. As for their rationale with the new AI integration: “The business value: Faster problem resolution, and a quicker path for new administrators to become proficient. This translates into higher developer productivity and accelerated project timelines.”

AI seems Overstated

By Himmy32 • Score: 3 Thread

My understanding is that Red Hat and Brian might both overstating be the AI boon/bogeyman here. Looks like the goose command is an Agentic AI Foundation/Linux Foundation project originally developed by Block and donated. And then Red Hat has made that available as a package in their Extensions Repo as an validated optional package that can work with Red Hat’s Developer Preview MCP Server (which is the Red Hat part and I don’t think is attached to the release of 10.2, but got released in January). Just like most other AI announcements seems to be a bit of investor fluff and required buzzwords.

Honestly I think the “image mode” work and the immutable, atomic updates along with donating and supporting bootc at the CNCF is the more notable and cooler part in 10 (hard from this announcement to know what 10.2 is even adding on this front). A lot of different plays on the immutable and atomic update spaces in the big distros. Which was even seen with the Microsoft Azure Container Linux based on Flatcar yesterday, SUSE bringing that immutability from Micro into their mainline, or Ubuntu with Core and snaps.

GitHub’s Internal Repos Breached Via Employee’s Use of Malicious VS Code Extension

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Longtime Slashdot reader Himmy32 writes:
GitHub has announced on X that their internal repositories have been breached through a compromised VS Code Extension on an employee’s workstation. Bleeping Computer reported that the attack is linked to TeamPCP who have been in the news for a recent campaign affecting Checkmarx, Trivy, SAP, TanStack, and Bitwarden. The group appears to be attempting to sell the stolen code on cybercrime forums.
“Yesterday we detected and contained a compromise of an employee device involving a poisoned VS Code extension. We removed the malicious extension version, isolated the endpoint, and began incident response immediately,” the company said. “Our current assessment is that the activity involved exfiltration of GitHub-internal repositories only. The attacker’s current claims of ~3,800 repositories are directionally consistent with our investigation so far.”
Although the investigation remains ongoing, GitHub says it has “no evidence of impact to customer information stored outside of GitHub’s internal repositories.” The company has also not said whether it’s in contact with the hackers or if it’s received a ransom demand.

I’d like to say “Use Pulsar” because I do

By Tora • Score: 3 Thread

But in reality it can happen w/any system that has open-submit add-ons.

GitHub

By PPH • Score: 3 Thread

… was an important resource for open source projects for many years. Since Microsoft took it over, it seems to be falling on its face frequently.

So I guess my comment is: Mission accomplished, Microsoft.

Anna’s Archive Hit With Global Domain Takedown Order

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from TorrentFreak:
A coalition of thirteen major publishers has won a massive $19.5 million default judgment against shadow library Anna’s Archive. A New York federal judge fully approved the publishers’ requests, issuing a broad permanent injunction that orders more than twenty specific global registries, hosts, and service providers to immediately disable the site’s remaining domains. […] At first glance, the damages award is the headline figure. Judge Rakoff granted the maximum statutory damages of $150,000 for each of the 130 “Works in Suit.” This brings the final damages bill amount to a staggering $19,500,000. However, as with the $322 million judgment won by the music industry against Anna’s Archive in the related Spotify case, it’s highly unlikely that this money will be recouped.

For now, the operators of Anna’s Archive remain strictly anonymous, which doesn’t help either. The default judgment (PDF) addresses this and requires the operators to unmask their identities and provide a sworn statement with valid contact information to the court within 10 days. However, since the operators have previously stated they hide their identities to avoid “decades of prison time,” it is safe to assume that the operators will simply ignore this request. The true power of this default judgment lies in the permanent injunction. Anna’s Archive is known to evade enforcement and change domain names when needed, so the injunction targets the technical intermediaries that keep the site online.

Specifically, the injunction orders “all domain name registries and registrars of record” to permanently disable access to Anna’s Archive’s domains and prevent their transfer to anyone other than the publishers or the music industry plaintiffs in the related case. In addition to domain name services, the order also extends to international hosting providers, who are also ordered to stop working with the site. Leaving no room for interpretation, the order specifically names more than twenty companies and organizations. This includes familiar names like Cloudflare, Njalla, and DDOS-Guard, as well as the domain name registries of the site’s current active domains […]. The names include some intermediaries that were already listed in the Spotify default judgment, as well as new ones.

This will go well

By liqu1d • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
We all know what a raging success blocking pirate sites has been so far.

No, just Deck Chair Number 418 in particular.

By Pseudonymous Powers • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Yeah, as an intellectual property holder, THIS should definitely be your priority right now, and not the coalition of corporations attempting to bring about the end of all human livelihoods through copyright theft.

What’s in a domain name

By alvinrod • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
It doesn’t sound like there’s anything preventing them from moving to a different domain. The companies involved in this suit likely wasted orders of magnitude more in their own legal costs than actual damages done or what they could hope to legally recover. So the operators should set up shop elsewhere and let the idiots bleed themselves as long as they want to.

Re:No, just Deck Chair Number 418 in particular.

By bill_mcgonigle • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Now that the Big Tech companies have done all their training on illegal material it’s important that no startups can compete.

History

By WolfgangVL • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

In a couple hundred years, the pirate sites and torrent indexers are going to be the go-to sources for the study of current day lifestyles and culture. Stories like this will be popping up every couple of years from then to now.

Seagate Sparks Memory Sell-Off As CEO Says It Would ‘Take Too Long’ To Build New Factories

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Seagate CEO Dave Mosley said Monday that building new memory chip factories or adding capacity would "take too long” to keep up with AI-driven storage demand. “If we took the teams off and started building new factories or bringing up new machines, that would just take too long. You would end up with more capacity, but then you’d slow the rate of growth on that technology,” Mosely said. CNBC reports:
Memory chip stocks have soared in recent months as a flood of AI investing has sent demand soaring, with the chips a key part of the AI buildout in data centers. Chip production cycles stretch over many quarters for a single unit, and investors are increasingly wary of how long the leading memory makers can capture demand. CME Group is launching a new futures market for semiconductors, enabling more traders to lock in prices and hedge against the rising prices of computing power.

At Monday’s conference, Mosely also addressed the “very long lead times” and maintaining predictability with its clients. “We know what’s coming out a year from now,” he said. “And we’ve basically gone to the customers and said, ‘Look, if you want to plan this really well, which it should be for your data centers, we know what’s coming out. You can buy this stuff up to a certain period.’ And so we want to keep that four or five quarters of visibility very, very solid for what’s being built. But the demand is significantly higher than that.”

Technobabble translation…

By the_skywise • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

He thinks its a fad and won’t invest in new factories… but he can’t SAY that because he wants that sweet, sweet AI bubble money.

Re:Cartel

By King_TJ • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Yep… back as far as 2006, several execs were indicted for price-fixing RAM:

https://www.justice.gov/archiv…

There was a class action lawsuit in 2018 over the same issue.

I assume Apple, at least, feels they’ve taken steps to control RAM availability with their transition to the M series ARM processors, because they integrate the memory and the video memory into the CPU itself?

Re:Technobabble translation…

By 93 Escort Wagon • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

No, I suspect it’s got more to do with short-term profits and his overall compensation, given he probably wouldn’t still be the CEO by the time any new factories were brought online.

Corporate boards typically only reward short-term thinking.

That kind of thinking brings in new players..

By Fly Swatter • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
Except the barrier to entry is too high. It would be fun if someone could manage to disrupt the memory consortium.

Either the companies think this AI hoarding will be short enough to not risk expansion (every economist and corporate type loves constant expansion) or they think their stranglehold on the market is too strong for anyone to offer new competition.

For us mere retail plebs - the corporate greed situation just sucks and is getting worse. This is the situation anti-trust laws were supposed to prevent.

Re:Technobabble translation…

By Local ID10T • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Building out a new fab takes years. I have done it.

You have to order the hardware (which has to be made to fill your order -it is not sitting waiting on a shelf), build the facility (some of the equipment is delicate and large enough that you pour a slab, crane in the equipment, and then assemble the building around it). You also need trained workers, and an entire material supply chain. Reliable power and water supplies. Once all that is in place you can begin the process of tuning the equipment -it does not just turn on and start producing chips.

Yearslong Fight Over Users’ Right To Tweak Smart TV Software Heads To Trial

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
A long-running lawsuit over Vizio’s Linux-based smart TV software is headed to trial in August, with the Software Freedom Conservancy arguing that GPL rules require Vizio to release complete source code owners could use to modify, maintain, or strip ads and tracking from their TVs. Ars Technica reports:
The outcome could reverberate across the industry. Because many of today’s popular smart TV operating systems are Linux-based, the case may help determine how much control many owners have over their sets. Access to the full code would allow users to make meaningful changes to how their TVs work, including limiting ads or deactivating automatic content recognition.

[…] The Software Freedom Conservancy argues it has the right to Vizio OS’s source code because it owns several Vizio TVs and because the operating system is based on Ubuntu, a Linux distribution. (SFC employees bought seven Vizio TVs from 2018 to 2021 after getting complaints about Vizio not sharing its TVs’ source code, according to the complaint.) In general, the Linux kernel is provided under the terms of GPLv2, as noted by kernel.org, which is run by the Linux Kernel Organization.

SFC’s lawsuit alleges that Vizio breached GPLv2 and LGPLv2.1 by failing to make available the complete source code for Vizio OS. The case is currently in the Orange County Superior Court of the State of California. The lawsuit targets Vizio specifically, but the impact could extend to other Linux-based smart TV OSes such as LG’s webOS, Samsung’s Tizen, and Roku’s Roku OS. “We expect all companies who distribute Linux and other software using right-to-repair agreements like the GPL in their products would comply with these agreements,” Denver Gingerich, the director of compliance at SFC, told Ars. […] SFC expects a ruling within three to six months of the conclusion of the trial, which is currently scheduled for August 10.

Vizio’s Arguments

By pak9rabid • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

nothing in the text of the GPLs suggests that third parties have the right to enforce alleged violations of the GPLs. Further, the FSF has made clear that it never intended third-party enforcement, stating publicly that ‘the copyright holders of the software are the ones who have the power to enforce the GPL’ and that ‘[i]f you think you see a violation of the GNU GPL [or] LGPL . . . you should send a precise report to the copyright holders of the packages that are being wrongly distributed . . . [because] we cannot act on our own where we do not hold copyright.

Maybe…in that case perhaps the authors of the software in question (Linux kernel, BusyBox, a handful of GNU utilities) should get involved to squash that argument.

Vizio also argued that GPL is a software license, not a contract, so the company has no contractual obligation to provide SFC with Vizio OS’s source code, even if SFC were considered a third-party beneficiary of GPLv2 LGPLv2.

Heh, good luck with that one. Furthermore, I don’t think that’s a precedent that any proprietary software wants set

This is gonna be a good one!

Re:Win the battle, lose the war

By Ksevio • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

And do what? Write their own OS along with every integration needed?

More likely they’ll separate the OS and the TV code so they can ship the open source OS along with their closed source software

Re:Vizio’s Arguments

By flink • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Vizio also argued that GPL is a software license, not a contract, so the company has no contractual obligation to provide SFC with Vizio OS’s source code, even if SFC were considered a third-party beneficiary of GPLv2 LGPLv2.

Heh, good luck with that one. Furthermore, I don’t think that’s a precedent that any proprietary software wants set

Great, so Vizio is violating the license and has no right to reproduce the software. I believe the statutory damage limit for each infraction is $150k? That’s gotta be a few billion to split amongst the various projects that are having their copyright violated by Vizio.

Re:Win the battle, lose the war

By caseih • Score: 5, Informative Thread

So what. If developers release software under liberal licenses that allow proprietary use, that’s on them. Vizio is welcome to use such code in a proprietary manner. How is that losing the war? Besides that, what war are you talking about?

When Vizio chose to use GPL’d software, they must abide by the terms or remove it. It was their choice to use that code.

Also stop calling them viral licenses. The GPL doesn’t infect anything. This is a lie, plain and simple. If you use any copyrighted code you must do so under the terms of the license whatever that is. If you fail to abide by the license you have three choices: 1. abide by the license terms and release your changes, 2. remove the code entirely, or 3. negotiate licensing terms that fit your needs. Corporations who fail to abide the license terms deserve what they get.

Re:The real killer for Visio

By txsable • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

This sounds great, how do I do that on Google TV/Tizen/Roku/etc? I’m not sure your solution goes further than a desktop OS....

Regional Winners of Prestigious Literary Prize Suspected of Using Chatbots

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
The 2026 Commonwealth Short Story Prize is facing backlash after several winning entries were accused of being AI-generated, with one Caribbean winner’s story flagged as fully AI-written by a detector that WIRED says it independently confirmed. From the report:
Each year, the Commonwealth Foundation, a nongovernmental organization in London, awards its short story prize to one writer in each of five regions: Africa, Asia, Canada and Europe, the Caribbean, and the Pacific. One overall winner is then selected from that short list. Regional winners take home [about $3,350], while the top winner, to be announced next month, claims [about $6,700]. On May 12, the respected UK literary magazine Granta published the top five 2026 entries — all previously unpublished, per the rules of the contest — on its website. (It has hosted the winning submissions for the prize since 2012.) Within days, however, one entry aroused suspicion. “The Serpent in the Grove,” a story by Jamir Nazir of Trinidad and Tobago, which had taken honors for the Caribbean region, struck a few people as bearing the stylistic tells of AI-generated text.

“Well, this is a first: a ChatGPT-generated story won a prestigious literary prize,” wrote researcher and entrepreneur Nabeel S. Qureshi, a former visiting scholar of AI at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University, in a post on X on Monday. "‘Not X, not Y, but Z’ sentences everywhere, the ‘hums’ trope, and plenty of other obvious markers of AI writing. A major milestone for AI, at any rate…” “They say the grove still hums at noon,” Nazir’s mysterious and atmospheric tale begins. In his screenshot of the opening paragraphs, Quereshi highlighted the second line as what he considered to be a signature example of AI syntax: “Not the bees’ neat industry or the clean rasp of cutlass on vine, but a belly sound — as if the earth swallows a shout and holds it there.”

As the literary community undertook a closer read of Nazir’s story, many criticized its language and metaphors as nonsensical, wondering how the Commonwealth judges could have seen any merit to them. Others shared screenshots showing that the AI-detection tool Pangram flagged “The Serpent in the Grove” as 100 percent AI-generated, a result that WIRED independently confirmed. (While no AI-detection software is perfect, third-party analysis has consistently determined Pangram to be the most accurate, with a near-zero rate of false positives.)

[…] Besides Nazir, two more winning authors have drawn allegations of using AI in their work. Pangram finds that “The Bastion’s Shadow,” by Maltese writer John Edward DeMicoli, winner for the Canada and Europe region, is fully AI-generated; it scans “Mehendi Nights,” by Indian writer Sharon Aruparayil, winner for the Asia region, as partly AI-generated. Neither DeMicoli nor Aruparayil immediately returned requests for comment when reached through their respective social media accounts. The other two short-listed stories, by Holly Ann Miller of New Zealand and Lisa-Anne Julien of South Africa, deliver “fully human-written” results from Pangram.
Wired also reports that one of the judges for the prize has been "accused of using AI to craft her descriptive blurb that accompanied the listing of ‘The Serpent in the Grove’ as a regional winner.’" Pangram labels the text as “AI-assisted.”

Literary critics

By reanjr • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Says more about literary critics than it does about LLMs.

It’s become clear over recent years that literary critics are actually not very good at reading. Whether it’s the rush to get through a work, some cognitive bias, or a fixation on fancy words, literary critics are bad readers who rarely understand what they are reading unless it comes in the form of formulaic language and presentation intended to make them feel comfortable with the writing.

LLMs are good at this. It does not mean LLMs are producing quality literature though. It’s just further evidence that literary critics wouldn’t recognize quality literature if it smacked then upside the head.

Question

By smooth wombat • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Let us suppose you are writing a story/book and you know there are places which you just can’t quite get the wording the way you want it.

If you plug only that portion into an LLM and ask for suggestions, would that be considered “cheating”? If so, why would that be any different than asking someone, or someones, to read what you wrote and offer suggestions?

I’m not saying that’s what happened here, clearly it was all written by a machine, but is using such a tool to edit your work or get suggestions, bad?

Google’s AI Studio Now Lets Anyone Build Android Apps In Minutes

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from TechCrunch:
The AI coding boom is now coming directly for Android app development. On Tuesday at Google IO 2026, the company announced new native Android app creation capabilities in its web-based Google AI Studio, shrinking a process that takes weeks of setup and coding down to minutes. The company also said that consumers will be able to use Gemini AI to find the apps they need, both on the Play Store and the web, expanding opportunities for developers to have their apps discovered.

Google says the new capabilities could make sense for anyone from a seasoned developer looking to prototype a new app quickly to a first-time creator. […] The apps are built with the Kotlin programming language using Google’s Jetpack Compose toolkit and with support integration with hardware sensors like GPS, Bluetooth, and NFC, the company says. However, the resulting creations, for now, are only meant to be used personally, as publishing for family and friends is still on the roadmap. The company suggests the technology could be used for the creation of personal utilities and simple social apps, hardware-enabled experiences, or AI-powered experiences.
Google is also adding an “Ask Play” AI overlay to the Play Store that lets users discover apps through natural-language conversations. “Perhaps more importantly, apps will begin to be surfaced with users’ conversations with Google’s Gemini virtual assistant, exposing developers’ apps to millions of users,” adds TechCrunch.

Where is the shovelware? Where’s the killer app?

By MIPSPro • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Where is the Shovelware?. Surely they could vibe code up a couple dozen killer apps to prove their point. Where are they? Show me how many of the top 10 Android apps were built this way. How many of the top 100? It’s like “Loveable” web-sites. They are simple, they suck, they leak data like sieve. Nobody wants shitware, folks, they want real working useful applications or fun/creative/attractive games. So far I’ve seen exactly ZERO made by AI.

Worth a look

By ZipNada • Score: 5, Informative Thread

This web-based development utility looks interesting and I tried it just now with this prompt;
“I want an Android app that can scan for local WiFi access points when a button is pushed and list them.”

It gave me a nice tab completion, “It should also display the signal strength for each access point” which I accepted. And yow, it built the complete app in under 10 minutes. It’s running in an emulator in the browser and showing mock access points, visually looks very good. I am officially giving everyone permission to use my amazingly awesome prompt, try it for yourself.

When I ask how to install the app on my phone I get; “To run this application as a fully functional, bare-metal hardware app on your physical Android phone, you will need to build the provided native Kotlin source code using Android Studio” and there are some pretty complicated instructions. That will probably be a roadblock for most people and it would be a PITA for me too.

However I’m seeing that Gemini is now integrated directly into Studio which is extremely handy. I can probably use the same prompt there and get a complete installable app in one step.
https://developer.android.com/…

Google Accused of Pushing ‘Free For Life’ G Suite Users Onto Paid Plans

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Google is again pressuring some longtime G Suite Legacy users to move onto paid Workspace plans, warning that accounts flagged as “commercial use” could lose access to Gmail, Drive, Calendar, and other services if appeals fail. “The trouble, according to users, is that the appeals system appears about as transparent as a brick,” adds The Register. From the report:
A reader alerted The Register to what appears to be a new crackdown on long-standing G Suite Legacy accounts, with similar complaints now piling up on Reddit from users accused of violating Google’s non-commercial use policy, despite insisting they use the accounts only for family email and personal domains. Reports have been stacking up on Reddit’s r/gsuitelegacymigration subreddit from users who say their long-running personal G Suite Legacy accounts are suddenly being classified as “commercial use” accounts and pushed toward paid Google Workspace plans by May 2026. A lot of users have been through this before. Google spent part of 2022 trying to wind down free G Suite Legacy accounts, then changed course after users running family domains made enough noise. Now some of those same users are being told they have fallen outside Google’s rules after all.

Emails seen by The Register warn users their accounts have been “identified as being used for commercial purposes” and say Google may start suspending Gmail, Calendar, Drive, Meet, and other Workspace services if they do not either win an appeal or begin paying for Workspace subscriptions. “Please upgrade to a paid Google Workspace subscription to continue using your services. Look out for a notification regarding the appeal process in Google Admin console or email,” the email reads. “If you don’t take action during your 45-day appeal period, Google will begin suspending your Google Workspace core services, including Gmail, Calendar, Drive, and Meet. As a result, you will lose access to these core services and data.”
One wrongly-flagged user said the company reversed its decision after they filed a GDPR data request seeking evidence. Others were less fortunate, with some reporting that family-only custom domains were permanently classified as commercial despite failed appeals.

Do they really need to make a buck here?

By Njovich • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Google makes so much money, is it really that important for them to go back on their promises and screw over some individual with a free email address?

Nobody forced them to offer ‘lifetime free’ promises, you can afford to keep your promise, keep your promise.

Trust Lost

By LondoMollari • Score: 3 Thread

At this point why would you trust Google for anything? They already dropped “Don’t be Evil” from the top of their corporate code of conduct. Maybe they just haven’t read the ending themselves.

The Grass Wasn’t Greener

By guesstral • Score: 3, Informative Thread
Google showed up with so much promise. Free for consumers, charge for business. Do no evil. Freedom from bloat. The grass, it seems, is never greener. I barely see a line between Google’s business practise and Microsoft’s, when 15 years ago they seemed like the refreshing choice of the next generation.

Craziest thing they’re doing it for no reason

By itsme1234 • Score: 3 Thread

These accounts actually have less features (usually from the small, niche ones, or sometimes for no rhyme or reason, like at some point reminders were disabled for all Gsuite/Workspace users - including the paying ones, they couldn’t leave Google Play reviews for a long time, etc.) than the regular Gmail accounts. If Google is making money out of Gmail (and surely they do, and like to have probably billions of them) they shouldn’t push the people out of these other free Gmail-like-but-with-other-Mx accounts.

And make no mistake, people aren’t pushed into the paid accounts - especially that there’s no family plan, you need to buy as many business subscriptions as users you have (family members+all throwaway accounts you setup to test Android phones or to allow your router to send emails or for your chinese Android TV where you don’t want to enter your account that has all your other stuff including Google Pay and so on). Everyone learned their lesson: if you need a proper Google account get that Gmail account and stay with the herd. For the rest there are plenty of options, starting from free. Even Apple has Apple Business (Custom Domain Email) with a free tier!!!

Re:Do they really need to make a buck here?

By thegarbz • Score: 5, Informative Thread

some individual

They aren’t screwing over individuals. Individuals have a migrate path to other Google options which offer the same thing for free. What they are doing is screwing over small businesses. G Suite Legacy provided not just a free email, it provided email access for up to 100 individual accounts tied to a different domain, along with some groupware like Docs. Effectively they were providing the services of a small webhost provider without also providing the domain. That’s also why they are suggesting users migrate to Workspaces. The cost recover is a potential maximum of $7/month/user. That’s $8400 revenue per year for anyone who maxed out their previous free service.

Still a dick move though. They should be forced to retain their lifetime free promise.

Webb Discovers One of the Universe’s First Galaxies

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Astronomers using the James Webb Space Telescope have identified an ultra-faint galaxy seen just 800 million years after the Big Bang. The galaxy contains almost no heavy elements, shows signs of intense early stellar radiation, and could offer a rare glimpse into the first stages of galaxy formation. Phys.org reports:
In a paper published in the journal Nature, a team of scientists led by Kimihiko Nakajima, an astronomer at Kanazawa University, Japan, describes how they used the telescope to study a part of the deep universe and discovered a faint galaxy called LAP1-B. “LAP1-B establishes a ‘fossil in the making,’ a direct high-redshift progenitor of the ancient ultra-faint dwarf galaxies observed in the local universe,” they wrote. Because the galaxy is so small and distant, it would normally be impossible to see. However, it was spotted due to a phenomenon known as gravitational lensing, in which a massive cluster of closer galaxies acts like a giant magnifying glass, boosting the light from LAP1-B by 100 times.

The scientists realized that most of the light from the galaxy wasn’t coming from the stars, but from glowing clouds of gas. They analyzed this light by splitting it into a spectrum and studying the emission lines, which revealed the chemical composition of the gas. They found that the galaxy contains almost no heavy elements, and its oxygen abundance is about 240 times lower than the sun’s, making it one of the most primitive star-forming galaxies ever observed. The emission lines also revealed intense ionizing radiation, which is what scientists expect to see from the first generation of stars.

The team also measured an elevated carbon-to-oxygen ratio. This matches the predicted chemical signature for the first star explosions in history from Population III stars, the first stars to exist in the universe. The stars we see today are Population I stars, which formed later and contain more heavy elements. Another fascinating finding is that, after measuring the gas’s motion and speed, the researchers concluded that the galaxy is held together by a massive cloud of invisible dark matter.

Would be more interesting

By hcs_$reboot • Score: 3 Thread
if they see a galaxy 800 million years before the Big Bang.

Re:Would be more interesting

By Ol Olsoc • Score: 5, Funny Thread

if they see a galaxy 800 million years before the Big Bang.

Different era - that would be the Big Foreplay.

Re: The researchers concluded… Hmmm.

By gerf • Score: 4, Informative Thread
It is not. If you add up the gravity from all the visible stars and dust, the mass is not enough to hold the galaxies together. Something that is not visible is involved and no one knows what it is.

Minnesota Becomes First State To Ban Prediction Markets

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from NPR:
Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz has signed the nation’s first law banning prediction market sites from operating in the state, and in response, the Trump administration has sued, teeing up a legal battle over the most far-reaching crackdown on popular services like Kalshi and Polymarket. It comes as states confront a growing standoff with the Trump administration over how to regulate the industry, which allows people to bet on virtually anything.

The new state law makes it a crime to host or advertise a prediction market, which it defines as a system that lets consumers place a wager on a future outcome, like sports, elections, live entertainment, someone’s word choice and world affairs. The prohibition extends to services supporting prediction markets, like virtual private networks, that could allow consumers to disguise their location and get around the ban. It would force prediction market sites like Kalshi and Polymarket to leave the state, or face possible felony charges. The law takes effect in August.

The law has a carve-out for event contracts that serve as an insurance policy in the event of “harm, or loss sustained” and for the purchase of securities and other commodities. The Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s lawsuit seeks to block the law before it starts, arguing the prediction market industry should be exclusively regulated by federal officials. “This Minnesota law turns lawful operators and participants in prediction markets into felons overnight,” said CFTC Chairman Michael Selig.

“Minnesota farmers have relied on critical hedging products on weather and crop-related events for decades to mitigate their risks. Governor Walz chose to put special interests first and American farmers and innovators last.” An updated version of the prediction market bill allows trading on weather, an exception that followed pushback from the agricultural industry, which has historically used futures trading on weather as a hedge against storms and other inclement weather that can affect a harvest. Walz is expected to sign it soon.
“We as a state should decide how best and what regulations we think should attach to gambling, to protect public safety, to protect our kids,” said Minnesota Rep. Emma Greenman, the Democrat who introduced the measure.
Kalshi spokeswoman Elisabeth Diana called the ban a “blatant violation” of the law. “Minnesota banning prediction markets is like trying to ban the New York Stock Exchange,” said Diana, adding that “this actively harms users because it reduces competition and drives activity offshore.”

Re:Prediction Markets

By Gravis Zero • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Bet they didn’t see that coming

$100 says they did!

Re:What about being in a free country

By Rei • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

The problem here isn’t scams and grift. It’s that by growing the number of bets by orders of magnitude, you grow the number of insiders with insider info by orders of magnitude. Which creates perverse incentives across your entire economy for people to profit off of their status, while simultaneously making it much harder to do so.

Say there’s a bet on whether Russia will take the village of Mala Tokmachka by a certain date. Well, now every Russian commander on that front has an incentive to have family members / friends bet against it and then delay / undercut their ability to wage incentives, while every soldier also has the incentive to do so and then do everything they can to spoil the offensive.

Or say the US is planning a major offensive in Iran, and various insiders are betting *on* an imminent attack. Well, Iran can feed Polymarket data into their intel assessments as one factor to help determine when the US will invade in order to maximize their readiness. OR, Iranian intel services could track down US officials / military officers who are making these bets based on insider info and blackmail them in order to get them to cooperate.

Every single aspect of society that gets bet on gets subtly undercut by the existence of these bets. It’s one thing to have bets be placed on sports, an action that by definition is entertainment, something that doesn’t actually matter. But it’s an entirely different thing to have bets on virtually everything in our world. It’s already been a problem with stock trading, but sites like Polymarket make it so, so much worse.

Re:And suddenly

By unrtst • Score: 5, Informative Thread

They want the Feds to overturn state-level pot legalization, ban sanctuary cities, etc.

,,,
I’d love to know exactly who “they” is in your comment here given that move. …

This is for medical use; not recreational. He’s clawing back control, not giving more permission. Meanwhile, GOP in the house is blocking funding for that very same rescheduling (as of April 2026), and GOP leaders and legislatures in the states are working to repeal elements of the legalization laws and weakening reforms.

What progress have the GOP actually accomplished on the pot legalization front? Thoughts and prayers?

Re:Trump is just protecting his money grabs

By Anonymous Coward • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Trump and cronies appear to indulge in insider trading on these prediction markets.

Donald Jr is on the board of Polymarket: https://www.cnbc.com/2025/08/2…

Re:amazing

By rsilvergun • Score: 5, Funny Thread
We literally made Biff Tannen presidents of the United States. Honestly Trump is probably worse as far as I know Biff wasn’t a pedophile.

Plex Triples Lifetime Subscription Cost To $750

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
BrianFagioli shares a report from NERDS.xyz:
Plex is raising the price of a new Lifetime Plex Pass from $249.99 to $749.99 on July 1. That’s a $500 increase for media server software. Plex says it needs the money for “long-term development” and future features, but a lot of self-hosting folks are already wondering if this is basically a soft way of killing the Lifetime option without officially removing it. At nearly $750, are people just going to move to Jellyfin instead?
As for those future improvements, Plex said the roadmap includes better downloads support, restored music and photo library support in mobile apps, NFO metadata support, IPv6 support, playlist editing on mobile, audio enhancements, and transcoding improvements.

Plex’s business model

By systemd-anonymousd • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I’ve never understood Plex. People pay a third party service for the right to access their own self-hosted server filled with pirated content? And hand their identity over to Plex while doing so?

Jellyfin

By wgoodman • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

As soon as Plex started pushing it as a social media platform I jumped ship. Jellyfin is hilariously superior.

Exactly 10x

By tttonyyy • Score: 5, Informative Thread

…what I paid for it a decade ago.

It still does the things I wanted it for then, but I can’t say I’ve really used any of the new features added over the last decade, which if anything pushed “just stream my media” to the background.

Plex isn’t for pirated content

By ebunga • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

I mean, some people probably use it for that, but Plex with a tuner card and everything you get with their subscription is the best streaming option out there.

Re:Plex isn’t for pirated content

By Mister Transistor • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Exactly this.

The DVR setup using TCP/IP tuners like the Silicon Dust HDHomeRun series (which I have) is very easy, not quite 1-button, but close. It scans for the Tuner, creates a “DVR” and then scans for over the air channels and populates a list automatically. Then, it downloads the guide data automatically. The quality of the guide data so far as not been bad, not too many errors, but it only goes about a week into the future so far.

The Plex Pass might give you more than you expect, free lifetime DVR guide data as mentioned above is but one of the things the Pass gets you. Here’s a quick list off the top of my head:

1. Registration with their proxy servers in case forwarding is needed for double-NAT situations, a nice feature every now and then.

2. Free OTA DVR guide data (as mentioned above, probably what, a $20.00/year value or so?).

3. Access to paid client binaries like for phones or tablets (such as iOS or Android). Some clients are free, like PC/Mac clients.

4. About 200-300 streaming TV channels, IPTV like HULU/FUBO/Sling, etc. It’s the same slop you get on cable TV besides the premium stuff HBO, etc and live Sports, mostly. You know, 24-hour History Channel (but not the actual History Channel, like a “best of” thing.

So, the “Lifetime Plex Pass” gets you IPTV, worth about $50 a month, and Guide Service, worth about $20 a year, you’re saving about $620 per YEAR. For IPTV and/or DVR service, that’s not too bad comparatively. But now, it looks like the new price point is right up there - it looks like they have priced it so that unless things get more expensive (a likely possibility!) you’re just about at the break-even point.

Also, just so no one thinks I’m a biased rabid drooling fan, here’s a few of the things I DON’T like about Plex:

1. Seems to go “offline” or have internet connection issues related to the server being available. Sometimes the proxy bridging servers (mentioned above) help this situation, but not always.

2. Transcoding and speed issues related to that. Unfortunately, it seems like Plex tries to aggressively transcode EVERYTHING, even when it shouldn’t or doesn’t need to. There are some settings that affect this or are supposed to but there are still some issues with it (there are some good Reddit threads on this).

3. Customer Service just seems mostly like a search engine for some things that people have had issues with, and somehow never got responses or resolutions to. I hate tech support threads or forums that exactly describe the problem that I am having, but don’t have a solution or any published answer or followup. “At that point the poster suffered a fatal coronary?”

OK, that’s about it. I just wanted to comment about the mixed feelings I had since the price was going up. FWIW, I bought mine back in 2021 and back then it was just under $100.00, I show $95 and change, probably with tax. As I recall it went to $100, $110 or $120, then $150. Then I think it jumped to $250 where it’s at now. It’s still a VERY good deal until July 1, 2026, at which point it will become a FAIR deal, unless things change.

Note: I am not an employee or affiliated with Plex in any way, but I’m a reasonably happy customer. I’ve been using it now for about 6 years with my own local video server, a local TV Tuner (Silicon Dust HDHomeRun QUATTRO) and TV viewing PC, which will record 4 OTA channels at once. I have had very few issues, as I said it was beguilingly easy to get set up initially, very simple configuration and maintenance, and most things seem to work pretty well in general.

Mr.T

Google Changes Its Search Box for the First Time in 25 Years

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Google is giving its iconic search box its first major redesign since 2001. The new design incorporates, you guessed it, artificial intelligence, “getting bigger and more interactive so that people can ask even longer questions and upload photographs and videos into queries,” reports the New York Times. “In addition, people can ask follow-up questions with a chatbot on Google’s main search page.” From the report:
The company will also offer digital assistants, known as agents, to automate searches so that someone who may be apartment hunting can be notified of a new listing without opening a real estate site like Zillow. The search features will be powered by a new artificial intelligence model, Gemini 3.5 Flash. Google said the model had improved on creating software code and performing autonomous tasks, worked faster and was less expensive to run than comparable models.

[…] Google is also bringing one of A.I.‘s biggest breakthroughs — software coding — to search. When people research complex topics like astrophysics, Gemini can build interactive graphics and simulations behind the scenes to provide a deeper answer than its previous listing of websites. Google said it was introducing an alternative to the agents powered by Anthropic’s Claude Code and OpenAI’s Codex. Called Gemini Spark, the service is embedded in Gmail, Docs and other Google products, where it can turn meeting notes spread across emails and chats into a single document. It can also read and draft emails.
“The open web is on its way out,” says Richard Kramer, a financial analyst with Arete Research. “With A.I., Google is reducing everyone to raw data providers.”

Income stream?

By ukoda • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
I’m told it real cost money to use in terms of power consumption etc which is usually restricted unless you subscribe for more tokens. So if they are going to waste resources for every search I do what’s the game plan to cover the extra cost they are forcing on a routine search?

- More adverts?
- Warnings you are reaching you 80% search limits and link to pay for more searches?
- Something else I didn’t want and didn’t sign up for?

I see no good end game for this ‘improvement’.

Re:All the big tech companies…

By XXongo • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Are you a rsilvergun sock puppet or something? If you don’t want AI search, just don’t click on it.

It’s getting damn near impossible to “just don’t click on” AI; it’s being stuck everywhere, whether we want it ot not. When I do a search, I want the search results, not a goddamn AI telling me what to think.

(Google searches keep getting worse. Now, likely as not, I get sites that don’t contain your search term. Yes, even when I put the important terms in quotation marks.)

I’m kind of okay with it and use AI mode a lot

By caseih • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Google search has been really poor for quite some time. Between SEO rubbish and just the general lack of context in conventional searches, at least half the time search fails to give me relevant results. Also conventional search lacks the ability to fine tune the search with added context. AI Mode may not succeed the first time, but I can add context to my search query, and steer the AI towards the relevant content (including telling it that it hallucinated). It works for me better than the old search. It’s not perfect and can fall down spectacularly. For example you asked AI about configuring something specific on your WiFi router of a particular make and model, it assumes that any and all WiFi router information applies when it clearly does not.

TLDR: conventional search is dead and has been for a long time. AI search actually does work, at least for me.

Re:I’m kind of okay with it and use AI mode a lot

By karmawarrior • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

It’s not “AI search”, it’d be useful if it was. One genuinely legitimate use of LLMs would be to filter search results so that when, for example, I search for something like “Linux DAAP client” it doesn’t give me a list of DAAP servers and pages on how to set up DAAP servers and so on because webpages that talk about setting up servers inevitably include the word “client” in them for obvious reasons.

What Google have been doing instead is more LLMsplaining. You ask it for help finding something and instead of helping it inserts its annoying and frequently inaccurate opinions in and only reluctantly will actually give you access to the things you actually asked for.

Google have decided that that really loud guy in the office who insists on giving you - well, everyone - his opinion on everything is a role model, not an annoying useless tosser.

Re:No company lasts forever.

By mce • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

No, it is not the beginning. That happened many years ago, when they first started to betray their original USP feature: just a simple textbox on a white page that searched very well and did nothing else. Add to that their massive Google Analytics privacy invasions and Google landed in my hate box a long time ago. I’ve basically dumped them (with the exception of maps) back when DuckDuckGo was first announced. For a while, I did still fall back on Google if I DDG didn’t give me what I wanted fast enough, but over time I’ve just completely stopped using Google for search. The thought of maybe trying them when a search doesn’t do what I want fast enough doesn’t even come up anymore.

And yes, I also hate that even DDG has been adding crap extra features. Whenever they do, I disable those as well.

I did have a rarely used (i.e. secondary) Google e-mail address at one point, a couple of centuries ago. However, I dropped that as well around 2012 or so and I never looked back. I don’t want them auto-reading my e-mail for their own nefarious purposes.

NextEra and Dominion’s $67 Billion Mega-Merger Is All About the Data Centers

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Inside Climate News:
A proposed merger of the largest utility in the country by market value, NextEra Energy, with the sixth-largest, Dominion, would create a megacompany at a time when data centers and rapid increases in electricity demand are reshaping the industry. The proposal, announced Monday morning and contingent on state and federal regulatory approval, would result in a company that leads in nearly every aspect of the US power and utility industry, including overall electricity generation, natural gas generation, and renewables. The $67 billion deal combines NextEra’s size and reach with Dominion’s positioning as the local utility for the world’s largest concentration of data centers in northern Virginia. But the results are likely bad for consumers and the environment, creating a company with enormous financial and political strength that will be difficult to effectively regulate, according to consumer advocates and analysts.

For perspective, only Exxon Mobil and Chevron would be larger based on market value among US-based energy companies. “Mergers are not about consumers; they’re about shareholders,” said Ari Peskoe, director of the Electricity Law Initiative at Harvard Law School. “For the Dominion shareholders, they are selling their shares at a premium. The executives are getting massive payouts for facilitating this, assuming it all goes through, and obviously NextEra believes the transaction is going to add value to the company. Ratepayers are all an afterthought.” The deal makes financial sense for both companies, said Andrew Bischof, an equity analyst for Morningstar. “We view the transaction as allowing NextEra to accelerate its data center ambitions, which had trailed those of its regulated peers, by using Dominion’s expertise and relationships to expedite NextEra’s data center hub plans,” he said in a note to clients.

NextEra, based in Juno Beach, Florida, includes Florida Power & Light, the largest regulated electricity utility in the state, and NextEra Energy Resources, a wholesale electricity supplier that owns power plants across the nation. Dominion, based in Richmond, Virginia, includes regulated utilities serving much of Virginia, parts of North Carolina and South Carolina, and other assets across the country. The company would be called NextEra Energy, and NextEra CEO John W. Ketchum would serve in the same role after the deal closes. Robert M. Blue, Dominion’s CEO, would be the CEO for regulated utilities for the merged company. The parties said they expect regulatory approvals to take 12 to 18 months. NextEra shareholders would own 74.5 percent and Dominion shareholders would own 25.5 percent, respectively, of the combined company in the all-stock transaction.
“We are bringing NextEra Energy and Dominion Energy together because scale matters more than ever — not for the sake of size, but because scale translates into capital and operating efficiencies,” Ketchum said in a statement.
Although the companies claim the deal would produce savings, including $2.25 billion in Dominion customer bill credits, former regulator Marissa Paslick Gillett said she was “flabbergasted by the tone deafness,” arguing that major utility mergers rarely deliver the promised “synergies” and often create “a behemoth” that is harder to regulate.

Others warned that a larger NextEra could use its political power “to the disadvantage of ratepayers,” while climate advocates said expanding methane gas plants to serve data centers would worsen pollution and leave vulnerable communities “at the short end of the stick.”

Renewables

By fahrbot-bot • Score: 3 Thread

… including overall electricity generation, natural gas generation, and renewables.

Which include several nuclear power plants and the largest pumped hydro plant in North America.

Data center operators will probably love those.

Wikipedia notes these generation statistics:

In 2022:

  • 18 percent of Dominion’s total electric production came from coal,
  • 23 percent from nuclear power, 48 percent from natural gas, and
  • 11 percent from hydroelectricity and other renewables.

Re:Likely inevitable

By gtall • Score: 4, Informative Thread

I already know how they will restructure utility rates, they’ll go up.

OpenAI Co-Founder Andrej Karpathy Joins Anthropic

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot
OpenAI co-founder Andrej Karpathy has joined rival AI lab Anthropic. “The hire is a major coup for Anthropic in the high-stakes competition for elite AI talent — and another sign the company is emerging as a magnet for some of the industry’s most respected technical minds,” reports Axios. From the report:
Karpathy will start this week on Anthropic’s pre-training team, which is responsible for the massive training runs that give Claude its core knowledge and capabilities, according to Anthropic. Karpathy will help launch a new team focused on using Claude itself to accelerate pretraining research — an increasingly important frontier as AI companies race to automate parts of AI development. “I think the next few years at the frontier of LLMs will be especially formative. I am very excited to join the team here and get back to R&D,” Karpathy said in a post on X.

Karpathy is a rare AI figure with credibility across research, industry and education. He was a founding member of OpenAI before serving as Tesla’s director of AI, where he led the computer vision team behind Autopilot. Karpathy coined the term “vibe coding" and recently described himself as being in a “state of AI psychosis” since December — embracing “tokenmaxxing” and aggressively stress-testing frontier models.