Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Anthropic Reveals $30 Billion Run Rate, Plans To Use 3.5GW of New Google AI Chips
  2. Cloudflare Fast-Tracks Post-Quantum Rollout To 2029
  3. New Revelations Reignite Crypto Scandal Involving Argentina’s President Milei
  4. Stanford Daily Ponders Fate of Bill Gates Namesake Building On April Fools’ Day
  5. LinkedIn Faces Spying Allegations Over Browser Extension Scanning
  6. China Flies World’s First Megawatt-Class Hydrogen Turboprop Engine
  7. New Jersey Cannot Regulate Kalshi’s Prediction Market, US Appeals Court Rules
  8. OpenAI Calls For Robot Taxes, Public Wealth Fund, and 4-Day Workweek To Tackle AI Disruption
  9. Teardown of Unreleased LG Rollable Shows Why Rollable Phones Aren’t a Thing
  10. AP Offers Buyouts As Part of Pivot Away From Newspaper Journalism
  11. Artemis II Astronauts Break Apollo Record For Farthest Distance Humans Have Traveled From Earth
  12. Samsung’s Messages App Is Shutting Down
  13. Germany Doxes ‘UNKN,’ Head of RU Ransomware Gangs REvil, GandCrab
  14. More Americans Are Breaking Into the Upper Middle Class
  15. Peter Thiel Is Betting Big On Solar-Powered Cow Collars

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Anthropic Reveals $30 Billion Run Rate, Plans To Use 3.5GW of New Google AI Chips

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Anthropic says its annualized revenue run rate has surpassed $30 billion and disclosed plans to secure roughly 3.5 gigawatts of next-generation Google TPU compute starting in 2027. Broadcom will supply the key chips and networking gear for the effort, the company announced. The Register reports:
News of the two deals emerged today in a Broadcom regulatory filing that opens with two items of news. One is a “Long Term Agreement for Broadcom to develop and supply custom Tensor Processing Units (“TPUs”) for Google’s future generations of TPUs.” Google and Broadcom have collaborated to produce custom TPUs. Broadcom CEO Hock Tan recently shared his opinion that hyperscalers don’t have the skill to create custom accelerators and predicted Broadcom’s chip business will therefore win over $100 billion of revenue from AI chips in 2027 alone.

Working on next-gen TPUs for Google will presumably help to make that prediction a reality. So will the second part of Broadcom’s announcement: a “Supply Assurance Agreement for Broadcom to supply networking and other components to be used in Google’s next-generation AI racks through up to 2031.” Broadcom’s filing also revealed one user of Google’s next-gen TPU will be Anthropic, which starting in 2027, “will access through Broadcom approximately 3.5 gigawatts as part of the multiple gigawatts of next generation TPU-based AI compute capacity committed by Anthropic.”

Wait…

By Locke2005 • Score: 3 Thread
We’re measuring CPUs in gigawatts, not megabytes or operations per second now? Dudes, the goal isn’t to waste as much energy as possible! That’s the most disgusting dick size measuring contest ever!

Cloudflare Fast-Tracks Post-Quantum Rollout To 2029

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Cloudflare is accelerating its post-quantum security plans and now aims to make its entire platform fully post-quantum secure by 2029. “The updated timeline follows new developments in quantum computing research that suggest current cryptographic standards could be broken sooner than previously expected,” reports SiliconANGLE. From the report:
The decision by Cloudflare to move its post-quantum security roadmap forward comes after Google LLC and research from Oratomic demonstrated significant advances in algorithms and hardware capable of breaking widely used encryption methods such as RSA-2048 and elliptic curve cryptography. […] The company said progress across three key areas — quantum hardware, error correction and quantum algorithms — is advancing in parallel and compounding overall capability. Improvements in areas such as neutral atom architectures and more efficient error correction are reducing the resources required to break encryption, while algorithmic advances are lowering computational complexity. […]

Cloudflare has already deployed post-quantum encryption across a large portion of its network and reports that more than half of human traffic it processes now uses post-quantum key agreement. The company plans to expand support for post-quantum authentication in 2026, followed by broader deployment across its network and products through 2028. By 2029, Cloudflare said, it expects all of its services to be fully post-quantum secure, with those services being available by default across its platform, without requiring customer action or additional cost as part of the company’s commitment to security upgrades.
Google said it plans to accelerate its post-quantum encryption migration target to 2029.

New Revelations Reignite Crypto Scandal Involving Argentina’s President Milei

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from the New York Times:
President Javier Milei of Argentina promoted a cryptocurrency last year that quickly skyrocketed in value then cratered just as fast, costing investors millions of dollars and setting off a scandal and an investigation. Mr. Milei said he was simply highlighting a private venture and had no connection to the digital coin called $Libra. New evidence is now raising questions about his assertion. Phone logs from a federal investigation by Argentine prosecutors into the coin’s collapse show seven phone calls between Mr. Milei and one of the entrepreneurs behind the cryptocurrency on the night in 2025 when Mr. Milei posted about $Libra on X. The contents of the calls, which took place before and after Mr. Milei’s post, are not known.

But the phone logs — which were obtained by The New York Times and first reported by a local cable news channel, C5N — suggest a greater degree of communication between Mr. Milei and the entrepreneurs who launched the token than what the president has publicly acknowledged. Newly uncovered messages also suggest Mr. Milei received regular payments from one of the entrepreneurs while he was a congressman. Mr. Milei has not publicly commented on the call logs and other documents, and he did not respond to a request for comment. He is named as a person of interest in the federal prosecutor’s continuing investigation into the digital coin, according to court documents reviewed by The Times, but has not been formally charged with any crime. The latest revelations have revived a scandal that threatens the very foundation of a president who rose to power and was elected president in 2023 by attacking a political class he called corrupt.

This is why Trump loves him.

By fredrated • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Birds of a feather…

Stanford Daily Ponders Fate of Bill Gates Namesake Building On April Fools’ Day

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
theodp writes:
"Gates Computer Science Building renamed Peter Thiel Center for Panoptic Computing" reads the headline of an April Fools’ Day story that ran in the Humor section of
The Stanford Daily
(with the further disclaimer that “This article is purely satirical and fictitious”). The story begins: “Following revelations that the billionaire founder of Microsoft, Bill Gates, had a longstanding relationship with convicted child sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein, Stanford has announced it will strip Gates’ name from the William H. Gates Computer Science Building and instead honor alumnus Peter Thiel B.A. ‘89, JD ‘92. Gates, who is not a Stanford alumnus, gave an initial gift of $6 million toward the building’s construction in 1992.”

While fictional, the story does make one wonder what may become of the academic and institutional buildings worldwide named after Bill Gates in the blowback over his past ties to Epstein, which have already played a factor in the breakdown of his marriage to Melinda French Gates and friendship with Warren Buffet. In addition to The Gates Computer Science Building at Stanford, this includes the Bill and Melinda Gates Computer Science Complex at the University of Texas at Austin, Bill and Melinda Gates Hall at Cornell, The Bill & Melinda Gates Center for Computer Science & Engineering at the University of Washington, and The William H. Gates Building at MIT’s Stata Center. Buildings named after Gates’ parents include Mary Gates Hall and William H. Gates Hall at the University of Washington, and The William Gates Building at the University of Cambridge (UK).

Aside from the Thiel angle, The Stanford Daily’s April Fools’ Day story may not be as far-fetched as it may seem — many universities’ naming policies include provisions allowing donors’ names to be removed from buildings, programs, or other facilities under extraordinary circumstances. For example, the University of Washington’s Regent Policy No. 50 states, “The University reserves the right to revoke and terminate any naming on reasonable grounds not limited to the revelation of corporate or individual acts detracting from the University’s mission, integrity, or reputation.” Then again, UW notes that Bill’s parents and siblings served as UW Regents for decades, so one expects Bill will be granted some leeway here for what he has characterized as ‘foolish’ choices on his part.

The real quote!

By CEC-P • Score: 5, Funny Thread
“We aren’t removing his name even though he’s a terrible person because they might up our Microsoft E3 license costs even more” - Standford, probaby (paraphrased).

Forget Gates

By ArchieBunker • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

How about the guy who is going to start WW3 at 8pm tonight? His opinion on Epstein? https://www.theguardian.com/us…

“I’ve known Jeff for 15 years. Terrific guy,”

And

He’s a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side

Re:Billionaire

By ArchieBunker • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

It worked for the president.

Re:Billionaire

By nightflameauto • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

There’s a pretty meaningful difference between “engage in terrible business practices” and “molest girls.”

While there may be a meaningful difference in theory, in reality it seems the difference is measurable in single-digit numbers against the entire class of folks who become billionaires. And while that’s not a huge number in general, it’s still enough to be classified beyond “concerning.”

Not to call myself out, but this could be a correlation vs causation thing. Maybe the wiring that leads to becoming a billionaire has a strong correlation to the wiring that leads one to becoming a molester/rapist. Both seem to suggest a lack of concern for the well being of others, and a very strong desire to take what you want, regardless of the affect it has on those around you.

Re:Maybe we should just cool it with guilt by asso

By haruchai • Score: 5, Informative Thread

“Why wasn’t Obama’s relationship with Bill Ayers disqualifying?”
because it was investigated

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…

LinkedIn Faces Spying Allegations Over Browser Extension Scanning

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
LinkedIn is facing allegations that it quietly scans users’ browsers for installed Chrome extensions. The German group Fairlinked e.V. goes so far as to claim that the site is “running one of the largest corporate espionage operations in modern history.”

“The program runs silently, without any visible indicator to the user,” the group says. “It does not ask for consent. It does not disclose what it is doing. It reports the results to LinkedIn’s servers. This is not a one-time check. The scan runs on every page load, for every visitor.” PCMag reports:
This browser extension “fingerprinting” technique has been spotted before, but it was previously found to probe only 2,000 to 3,000 extensions. Fairlinked alleges that LinkedIn is now scanning for 6,222 extensions that could indicate a user’s political opinions or religious views. For example, the extensions LinkedIn will look for include one that flags companies as too “woke,” one that can add an “anti-Zionist” tag to LinkedIn profiles, and two others that can block content forbidden under Islamic teachings.

It would also be a cakewalk to tie the collected extension data to specific users, since LinkedIn operates as a vast professional social network that covers people’s work history. Fairlinked’s concern is that Microsoft and LinkedIn can allegedly use the data to identify which companies use competing products. “LinkedIn has already sent enforcement threats to users of third-party tools, using data obtained through this covert scanning to identify its targets,” the group claims. However, LinkedIn claims that Fairlinked mischaracterizes a LinkedIn safeguard designed to prevent web scraping by browser extensions. “We do not use this data to infer sensitive information about members,” the company says. “To protect the privacy of our members, their data, and to ensure site stability, we do look for extensions that scrape data without members’ consent or otherwise violate LinkedIn’s Terms of Service,” LinkedIn adds.

[…] The statement goes on to allege that Fairlinked is from a developer whose account was previously suspended for web scraping. One of the group’s board members is listed as “S.Morell,” which appears to be Steven Morell, the founder of Teamfluence, a tool that helps businesses monitor LinkedIn activity. […] Still, the Microsoft-owned site is facing some blowback for not clearly disclosing the browser extension scanning in LinkedIn’s privacy policy. Fairlinked is soliciting donations for a legal fund to take on Microsoft and is urging the public to encourage local regulators to intervene.

Say after me

By Bruce66423 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

DON’T USE CHROME.

In other news the Lutheran church in Rome denied that it had received a membership application from Pope Leo, whilst ursine faecal material continues to found in forested areas.

Outlived its usefulness

By Ritz_Just_Ritz • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I’ve pretty much stopped visiting linkedin. First it was the pet videos, then the political nonsense, then an onslaught of spam trying to sell shit to me 24/7. Now it’s just a place to park my resume.

Good riddance.

Re:Say after me

By DarkOx • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Exactly Chrome and realistically Chromium is essentially malware. Geeks especially should consider it a civic duty to use basically anything else. Which pretty much leaves Firefox and Safari.

Browser diversity is critical to keeping the web actually open. Even if Chromium is open source, the reality is Google drives the project entirely. It puts them in a powerful position to gatekeep, and that is bad for all the same reasons it was bad when IE-5/6 ruled the web, nearly uncontested.

We don’t want a web where the only standard is whatever chromium does.

Re:Say after me

By DarkOx • Score: 5, Informative Thread

For the individual that is certainly better than Chrome, but from a perspective of does it give Alphabet, any less influence not really much better.

I come back to if we allow Chromium to become essentially the only online HTML Document rendering engine in use, Google makes all the rules. It is really to large a project for any entity not a large corporate to fork.

Just look at the whole plugin architecture(Manifest V2) stuff, Google got their way because the plugin architecture touches so much and nobody maintaining Chromium based alternative browser could realistically keep up with the mainline if they forked or tried to keep a patch set running.

Google basically unilaterally decided what web-plugins are allowed to do; and nobody was able to stop them.

Re:How is this possible?

By fuzzyfuzzyfungus • Score: 5, Informative Thread
According to the writeup; there are two methods: it is possible for an extension to mark some parts of itself as ‘web accessible’; and linkedin has assembled at least one characteristic file for 6,1000-odd extension IDs and attempts to fetch it to confirm/deny the extension’s presence.

The other is based on the fact that the whole point of many extensions is to modify the site in some way; but the site normally has largely unfettered access to inspect itself, so they have theirs set up to walk the entire DOM looking for any references to “chrome-extension://" and snagging the IDs if found.

Not exactly a ‘declare installed extensions’; but it looks like, out of some combination of supporting the use cases where an extension and page actively interact by design and either not wanting the possibility or not wanting the complexity of trying to enable ‘invisible’ edits(presumably some sort of ‘shadow’ DOM mechanism where as far as the site and everything delivered with it knows only its unedited DOM and resources exist; but the one the user sees is an extension-modified copy of that one, which sounds like it could get messy), inferential attacks are fairly easy and powerful.

China Flies World’s First Megawatt-Class Hydrogen Turboprop Engine

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Longtime Slashdot reader walterbyrd shares a report from Fuel Cells Works:
China says the AEP100, a megawatt-class hydrogen-fueled turboprop engine developed by the Aero Engine Corporation of China, has completed its maiden flight on a 7.5-ton unmanned cargo aircraft in Zhuzhou, Hunan. The 16-minute test covered 36km at 220km/h and 300 meters altitude, with the aircraft returning safely after completing its planned maneuvers. State media described it as the world’s first test flight of a megawatt-class hydrogen-fueled turboprop engine. […] The Aero Engine Corporation of China (AECC) says the result shows China now has a full technical chain for hydrogen aviation engines, from core parts to system integration, which is the kind of capability needed before any industrial rollout can begin.
You can watch a video of the test flight here.

7.5 ton UAV testing flight

By T34L • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

I’m genuinely curious if it’s easier to get cleared on safety permit on a previously unflown engine in a 7.5 ton plane if the plane is unmanned rather than if it’s manned.

I’d expect that at least in EU, it being an UAV would actually make it harder to get it cleared, but I don’t know that for a fact and I wonder how it is there and elsewhere in the world.

Either way, pretty neat!

Re:7.5 ton UAV testing flight

By Mr. Dollar Ton • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

It used to be the case that the testing permits for drones (esp. small ones) were easier to obtain, but the rules were recently tightened across the board. Be that as it may, for an aircraft of this size the paperwork needed by the Chinese FAA equivalent is nearly identical to the one for a manned unit.

You’ll definitely need an air worthiness certification, which is hard to get and identical for both types. For the normal airplane, you’ll also need a licensed pilot, for the drone - a licensed/certified operator, which would be a bit less strict, but not significantly so. You’ll also need air traffic control approval, etc.

TL;DR: nearly the same requirements.

Fun fact

By DrXym • Score: 5, Informative Thread
Off gassed hydrogen has ~ 37x the warming potential of CO2 on the climate. Not because hydrogen causes warming itself, but because its presence in the atmosphere extends the lifespan of methane by bonding with radicals that would otherwise break down methane sooner. It’s not something we want to see any country or industry adopting.

Re:Fun fact

By cusco • Score: 4, Informative Thread

No, it has a GWP100 of 11.6, CO2 is the reference chemical so its GWP100 is 1. Methane is 81. So a kilo of released H2 has the global warming potential of 11.6 kilograms of carbon dioxide, while NH4’s potential is equivalent to 81 kilograms of CO2.

https://www.nature.com/article…

Re:Dead end

By cusco • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

While the US just repaid a French company a billion dollar deposit to cancel offshore wind farms, China has constructed the largest wind turbines in the world for their newest wind farms.

https://kdwalmsley.substack.co…

This is the world’s largest offshore wind turbine. It is off of Fujian province, in South China. It generates enough power for 44,000 households, or over a hundred thousand people. It displaces 22,000 tons of coal per year. This unit is part of a large farm 30 km offshore, where there are already a number of 16-megawatt turbines, and when those were installed, they were the world’s largest.

It’s a breakthrough in engineering, that this much output comes from a single turbine, instead of a group of them working together, and experts say that it will inform future wind farms. That’s also a region that sees frequent severe storms.

This was all hard to do, then, and we’re curious why the Chinese bothered at all. It required a ship to be specially designed and built, just to get the turbine into position. Having it out there means that China can leave 22,000 tons of coal in the ground they otherwise would have hauled to the surface and set on fire . . .

In December, the Interior Department announced an immediate pause on offshore wind projects under construction in the United States, due to national security risks identified by the Department of War. The government found that big turbine blades create radar interference, and obscure legitimate moving targets and generate false ones.

It’s not great to learn that our money-no-object Pentagon has radars that can’t tell the difference between a supersonic bomber flying toward Washington, or a windmill floating off of Long Island Sound. And it’s also not great that the White House has just told the rest of the world that our radars are that bad. This should be in a super-top-secret Pentagon report, instead of a press release from the White House.

New Jersey Cannot Regulate Kalshi’s Prediction Market, US Appeals Court Rules

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Reuters:
A federal appeals court ruled on Monday that New Jersey gaming regulators cannot prevent Kalshi from allowing people in the state to use its prediction market to place financial bets on the outcome of sporting events. A three-judge panel of the Philadelphia-based 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled 2-1 (PDF) in finding that the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission has exclusive jurisdiction over the sports-related event contracts that Kalshi allows people to trade on its platform. The ruling marked the first time a federal appeals court has ruled on what has become the central issue in an escalating battle over the ability of state gaming regulators to police the activity of prediction market operators.

Kalshi and companies like it allow users to place trades and profit from predictions on events such as sports and elections. States argue that firms like Kalshi are operating without required state licenses, in violation of gaming laws, including bans on wagers by those under 21. Those states include New Jersey, which last year sent Kalshi a cease-and-desist letter stating that its listing of sports-related event contracts on its platform violated state gambling laws that prohibit betting on collegiate sports. Kalshi sued the state, arguing its event contracts qualify as “swaps,” a type of derivative contract, that under the Commodity Exchange Act can only be regulated by the CFTC, which had granted the company a license to operate a designated contract market (DCM).

A lower-court judge had sided with New York-based Kalshi and issued a preliminary injunction, prompting New Jersey to appeal. But a majority of the judges on the 3rd Circuit panel concluded the Commodity Exchange Act likely preempted state law. “Kalshi’s sports-related event contracts are swaps traded on a CFTC-licensed DCM, so the CFTC has exclusive jurisdiction,” U.S. Circuit Judge David Porter wrote. The ruling was in line with the position advanced in other litigation by the CFTC under President Donald Trump’s administration. The regulator last week sued Arizona, Connecticut and Illinois to prevent them from pursuing what it called unlawful efforts to regulate prediction markets.

So much for the rule of law

By rsilvergun • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
There is absolutely no commodity here or anything approaching something regulated by futures trading. This is obviously just gambling.

These gambling businesses are draining about 60 billion a year mostly from Young men. There will be long-term social consequences and if you’re not really old and about to die you will experience them. Like it or not you and I all live in the same society.

Re:Not a fan of it but glad they won

By T34L • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

See there’s no way to word this that won’t sound like whataboutism, but I’m legitimately curious of your opinion on some other ways I think would be really neat to be able to spend my money on that I don’t believe I currently legally can, but I’m interested in your opinion if I should be able to;

- Do you think I should be able to legally spend my money on crowdfunding assassination of someone specific? I feel like there’s some really unpopular people that could be done away with that way. You could pretty much do it on Kalshi as is, too! Any bet against someone dying before some date is effectively funding the would-be assassin who could buy the “will die”, then doing the deed to ensure payout.

- Do you think I should have the freedom to just start a casino in my house, ignoring licenses, taxes and all of those that currently apply to those? Because Kalshi for all intents and purposes just is that. I’m pretty sure I could fairly easily run a webcam pointed at a roulette that’d automatically open and resolve little prediction markets on individual round outcomes, same with the blackjack of course. You don’t even need chips; you just scan a QR code with your phone when you sit down, and tap buttons from there.

- Do you think that I should be able to fund my moidle casino and my assassination “bets” by, instead of entering securities markets and dealing with all the bothersome requirements of public disclosure and meddlesome legal liability tied to issuing publicly traded stock, simply betting on my company’s earnings and performance on Kalshi and effectively using the sentiment there as investment stock people can pass me capital to effectively receive a stake in my biz? Because you really don’t need a stock market if you can just sell bets on your biz on Kalshi.

Betting markets can very effectively simulate money flows in many areas of society that are fairly strictly controlled for a broad variety of reasons, but suddenly, because you do it in crypto and purely virtually, they’re bypassed. I’m, again, seriously, non-rhetorically asking your opinion, because I do wish to learn if you believe all these regulations are wrong and moot and should be relaxed, and thus Kalshi should be allowed to operate as it does, or if you somehow can explain the belief that these old methods should remain regulated and prediction markets should be an exception allowing previously regulated behaviors.

Re:Not a fan of it but glad they won

By T34L • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Okay, cool, so, I open a not-a-casino in Houston, Texas and pitch up one of these bitcoin ATMs in the foyer, and since all of the actual transactions of gambling and crowdsourcing assassinations happens on a prediction market hosted in South Africa, from the local legal standpoint the local operation with the blackjack tables and hookers and bounty boards listing the payout on proof of killing all should have the legal liability and tax exposure comparable to a chuck-e-cheese, is that correct?

Again to be clear, I do consider myself moderately pro-gambling, definitely pro-hooker and could probably could think of a person or two whom I wouldn’t mind at all seeing getting ventilated on live TV. But I am trying to understand the people who seem they’d classically have issues with all of these things but seem to believe the virtual standoff distance makes it something else.

It depends

By rsilvergun • Score: 4, Funny Thread
Did you do it on an app? If so then yeah, you are an innovator disrupting a space and a technology company so it’s all good.

Re:So much for the rule of law

By cayenne8 • Score: 4, Funny Thread

Clarence Thomas is another great example, George Bush was angry he was going to have to nominate a black man because he was as you might imagine kind of racist so he picked the most incompetent and corrupt black man he could find and rammed him through the Senate.

I think Judge C has had some of the most brilliant legal reasonings in the past century…thank God for him on the court.

I rate him second only to Scalia....

OpenAI Calls For Robot Taxes, Public Wealth Fund, and 4-Day Workweek To Tackle AI Disruption

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
OpenAI is proposing (PDF) sweeping policy changes to help manage the societal disruption caused by advanced AI, including taxes on automated labor, a public wealth fund, and experiments with a four-day workweek. The company said the policy document offered a series of “initial ideas” to address the risk of “jobs and entire industries being disrupted” by the adoption of AI tools. Business Insider reports:
Among the core policy suggestions is a public wealth fund, which would see lawmakers and AI companies work together to invest in long-term assets linked to the AI boom, with returns distributed directly to citizens. Another is that the government should encourage and incentivize employers to experiment with four-day workweeks with no loss in pay and offer “benefits bonuses” tied to productivity gains from new AI tools.

The policy document also suggests lawmakers modernize the tax system and shift the tax base to corporate income and capital gains, rather than relying on labor income and payroll taxes that could be hit by a wave of AI-powered job losses. It also recommends taxes related to automated labor. OpenAI also called for the accelerated expansion of the US’s electricity grid, which is already feeling the strain from a wave of data center construction and energy demand for training ever more powerful AI models.

High Regulations Favor Large Companies

By SmaryJerry • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Small companies can’t comply so large companies love it when there is more regulations. OpenAI explicitly calling for robot labor taxes would prevent a lot of competition.

Weak PR

By abulafia • Score: 5, Informative Thread
This is an attempt to reduce fear, but it seems like a pretty sophomore effort.

They have enough money for really good PR, so I have to imagine there are… personalities interfering. Or maybe just one.

Going to be fun watching the hustling as they try to IPO with a CFO who says it won’t work.

Re:Oh come on....

By Powercntrl • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Did the transistor companies get taxed to “compensate” the people/companies who made vacuum tubes that would be put out of work? No.

That would be the original trans panic.

Why would I need to get rich

By rsilvergun • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
If I already own everything and I have a limitless supply of robots to tend to my needs?

Yeah I need some engineers to keep the robots going and some thugs to keep the engineers in line but that’s a few thousand people tops. Everybody else can just go live in squalor.

If you’ve ever seen an Indian reservation before the casinos that’s what the Epstein class has in store for you and me.

Basically they are tired of the exact kind of dependency you are describing. And they are taking steps to eliminate that dependency.

Re: I think it would be a good idea..

By DamnOregonian • Score: 5, Informative Thread
Because that’s only something you can do to a limited extent. Continue doing it, and you’ll run out of paper to print that money on before you’ve got enough for a loaf of bread.
The Fed exists to smooth over panics. Nobody thinks you can print your way to replacing the economic ladder.

Teardown of Unreleased LG Rollable Shows Why Rollable Phones Aren’t a Thing

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
A teardown video of LG’s never-released Rollable phone helps explain why rollable phones never became a real product category: they were likely too expensive, fragile, and complicated to manufacture at scale.

“The complexity of the internals would have made the Rollable extremely expensive to manufacture, and it would have demanded a high price tag,” reports Ars Technica. “Durability is also a big concern. There’s just a lot going on inside this phone, with multiple motors, springy arms, tracks, and a screen that has to loop around the back. […] It seems unlikely the LG Rollable could have survived daily use for multiple years.” From the report:
The LG Rollable is just one of several rollable concept phones that appeared throughout the early 2020s. Flexible OLED screens had finally become affordable, leading to foldable phones like the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold. Although, “affordable” is relative here. Foldables were and still are very expensive devices. Based on what we can see of the complex inner workings of the LG Rollable, these devices may have commanded even higher prices. Noted YouTube phone destroyer JerryRigEverything managed to snag a working prototype LG Rollable. It may even be the unit LG demoed at CES 2021.

The device looks like a regular phone at first glance, but a quick swipe activates the motor, which unfurls additional screen real estate from around the back. This makes the viewable area about 40 percent larger without the added thickness of a foldable. The device expands with the aid of two tiny motors, which are attached via straight teeth to an internal track. The screen assembly has zipper-like teeth that keep it locked into the frame as it moves. The motors make a surprising amount of noise when operating, so LG designed the phone to play a musical chime to hide the sound. While the motor does the heavy lifting, the phone also has a lattice of articulating spring-loaded arms inside that keep the OLED panel even as the frame slides side to side. The battery and motherboard sit in a tray that allows the back of the phone to expand as the OLED rolls into view.

This is a prototype phone, featuring a chunky frame and visible screws. That helped Zack Nelson from JerryRigEverything successfully disassemble and reassemble the phone. So this little bit of mobile history was not destroyed, and the teardown gives us a good look at how LG was hoping to attract new customers before calling it quits.

What could possibly go wrong?

By Locke2005 • Score: 4, Informative Thread
My ex didn’t ask me for advice first and bought the Samsung folding phone to impress her friends. Yep, it’s got a big line of non-functional pixels down the middle now, exactly as I would have expected.

The devil is moving parts.

By upuv • Score: 3 Thread

Moving parts is the curse on durability.

Todays phones have 0 moving parts. If you exclude the external buttons for volume and power etc.

Moving parts are point of failure. Moving parts almost always point to a point of dust/liguid intrusion. Moving parts are extensive to build assemble and maintain.

Rollables as designed currently are a mess of moving parts. And in this LG phone case. Motorised moving parts. Which is even worse.

I don’t really think you will see a rollable until almost all moving parts are gone. The only way I see them working is if you get a screen that literally rolls up all by itself. No extra casing, mechanisms etc. Just the screen that rolls up into tube around a solid core body. To do this the durability of the screen needs to improve vastly. The structural regidity needs to be a core attribute of the screen not the thing holding the screen.

And to top it all off it has to be cheap. Lets face if a rollable is going to wear out much faster than a modern gorilla glass phone. So replacement cycles are going to be much quicker. People will not shell out $3000 every 6-12 months for a phone. ( I acknowledge the apple cult does have a subset of people that do this. )

two separate screens would be better....

By zmollusc • Score: 3 Thread

…if your browser was on one screen and all the popup ad windows were on the other.

We are way past these things being phones.

By jpellino • Score: 3 Thread

Let’s just call them what they are, dopamine delivery devices.
In which case no idea is too far out in order to monetize what goes through them.

Re:never?

By dbialac • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
Foldables are fine. I’ve owned 4 Z-Flips. Their thickness isn’t an issue. Your jeans might be the problem, but even then they fit fine and don’t warp like an iPhone does. The fact is properly designed versions fit into my pockets a lot better than flat phones in part because they don’t need a case. The Z-Flip 5+ are terrible phones because the outside display completely destroys the whole concept behind a flip phone: when you drop it, the screen doesn’t break. But hey, lets let a reviewer who holds on to a phone for 2 weeks determine the design instead of somebody who’s owned them for years.

AP Offers Buyouts As Part of Pivot Away From Newspaper Journalism

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
The Associated Press is offering buyouts to U.S. journalists “as part of an acceleration away from the focus on newspaper journalism that sustained the company since the mid-1800s,” the not-for-profit outlet reported today. AP says it is making the move from a position of strength, responding to shrinking newspaper revenue and growing demand from digital, broadcast, and tech clients.

“The AP is not in trouble,” said Julie Pace, executive editor and senior vice president of the AP. “We’re making these changes from a position of strength but we’re doing so now to recognize our changing customer base.” From the report:
The news organization is becoming more focused on visual journalism and developing new revenue sources, particularly through companies investing in artificial intelligence, to cope with the economic collapse of many legacy news outlets. Once the lion’s share of AP’s revenue, big newspaper companies now account for 10% of its income. “We’re not a newspaper company and we haven’t been for quite some time,” [said Pace].

Despite changes — the company has doubled the number of video journalists it employs in the United States since 2022 — remnants of a staffing structure built largely to provide stories to newspapers and broadcasters in individual states have remained. That has its roots well back in American history; the AP was started in the mid-19th century by New York newspapers looking to share the costs of reporting outside their immediate territory.

The number of AP journalists who will lose jobs is murky, in part intentionally. The AP does not say how many journalists it employs, though it has a large international presence as well as its U.S. staff. Pace said the AP’s goal is to reduce its global staff by less than 5%. The Marketing and Media Alliance estimated the AP had 3,700 staffers, but it was not clear when that estimate was made. Since buyouts are being offered now to only U.S. journalists, it stands to reason that the cut among that workforce will be more than 5%. Whether there are layoffs depends on how many people take the offer, Pace said.

Re:What replaces their journalism? More yellow?

By Fly Swatter • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Top notch Journalism takes time to verify before printing. Today that doesn’t work well when several Joe Blows have already put out a blog post on the same topic with no fact checking and even if completely wrong no one will bother to read the Journalist’s equivalent in a few days after all the verification has been done.

It’s a terrible place to be for those that want to deliver actual Journalism. And just as bad for those that welcome actual Journalism. The noise to signal ratio is just that bad.

Re:Funny! “Pivot Away From Newspaper Journalism”

By XXongo • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
The people who are afraid of journalists actually doing real journalism, uncovering and reporting truths that the people in power would rather were not made public, have waged a long war to discredit journalism, as well as funding a plethora of fake news sites. It seems to be working.

Re:Funny! “Pivot Away From Newspaper Journalism”

By XXongo • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Bullshit.

Got any evidence to prove the parent wrong? Because I suspect there’s a LOT of black-and-white undeniable shit being slapped against your claim. Hard.

You have the burden of proof backwards. Mr. AC made an assertion that the Associated Press “went full on Activist Group long ago”. It’s up to you, AC, to show evidence for that assertion, which takes more than another assertion that “there’s a LOT of black-and-white undeniable shit.”

OK, if there’s “a lot” of undeniable shit— show it. I’ll help; here the AP website.

So that’s not actually the problem

By rsilvergun • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
We always like to blame the kids because we’re old farts and old farts hate kids because kids backs don’t hurt all the time and kids have their whole lives in front of them whereas we’re staring down the barrel of eternity..

But no the problem isn’t that young people don’t care about truth. The problem is virtually all of the news outlets have been bought up by a handful of billionaires and those billionaires not only don’t care about the truth they are actively opposed to it. So the last thing they’re going to do is buy a bunch of AP stories and run them and pay the AP for real journalism. They want AI generated slop propaganda that tells you how great having an Epstein class is.

So for example they don’t want journalists reporting on all the dead bodies in Iran from the civilian infrastructure we are targeting. And they don’t want journalists explaining that when Trump said he would attack Bridges and power plants in order to get leverage during the negotiations that it became a war crime because you aren’t allowed to attack civilian infrastructure just to get a leg up and negotiations, they have to be legitimate military targets.

Stuff like that is why the AP needs to go. Now billionaires don’t do things out right and directly because you would notice and get pissed off. Instead they buy up all the newspapers and TV stations and then just stop buying content from journalist outlets. And then the predictable happens that the associate press can’t make enough money to survive and here we are.

And most people don’t put two and two together and realize that it was downstream impacts from the Epstein class season control of our media that killed journalism. Instead we blame tiktok which is to say young people because tick tock is associated with young people…

Re:AP spin

By damn_registrars • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

In other words, we are toast. Sad because AP was once one of the original newspapers/sites with journalists rather than editorialists but that ship has sailed for most if not all of those outfits. It’s hard keeping up with the Kardashians/Jones, whatever.

You’re missing the point of the AP, and it’s actual composition. I worked at a daily newspaper most of my way through undergrad and knew the ins and outs of the AP better than most.

The main use of the AP was to get international news to outlets who couldn’t afford to place staff in places further away from their own location. A great example is any international war, though even big national events (9/11 being a great example) are also places where AP stories are valuable.

The AP carries very little editorial content. Yes there are a few editorial writers who publish there but the volume from them is minimal compared to the objective news reporting. Some people like to claim otherwise but that is from those who aren’t actually looking at the body of work on ap.org.

Unfortunately the newspaper model is indeed dying. Many of us are lamenting it and we’re not sure what solution could bring it back. Printed news was supported by advertising, both display ads and classified ads. In the 90s your local daily paper likely had 4-8 pages of classified ads, every day. Now the majority of that is on craigslist or facebook. On Sundays your paper had full color printed advertising inserts from over a dozen retailers; many of those retails have since gone out of business and many of the ones who remain don’t advertise that way anymore. Online subscriptions can offset a small part of this, but only a small part. Online advertisements are blocked by most readers’ browsers, so that isn’t productive for newspapers in many cases either.

The tabloid and editorial “journalism” you refer to is successful because it does a better job of selling crap to its audience. Don’t confuse it with the professionals at the AP.

Artemis II Astronauts Break Apollo Record For Farthest Distance Humans Have Traveled From Earth

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Artemis II has broken the Apollo 13 record for the farthest distance humans have ever traveled from Earth. NASA reports:
The Artemis II crew of NASA astronauts Reid Wiseman, Victor Glover, and Christina Koch, along with CSA (Canadian Space Agency) astronaut Jeremy Hansen have set the record for the farthest distance from Earth traveled by a human mission, surpassing the Apollo 13 record of 248,655 miles set in 1970.

NASA Flight Director Brandon Lloyd, Capsule Communicator Amy Dill, and Command and Handling Data Officer Brandon Borter also marked a lighthearted milestone today by emailing the crew what is now assumed to be the longest person-to-person message ever sent in human history. After breaking the record for human spaceflight, crew also took a moment to provisionally name a couple of craters on the Moon, noting they were able to see them with their naked eye.

Just northwest of Orientale basin highlighted above is a crater they would like to name Integrity after their spacecraft and this historic mission. Just northeast of Integrity, on the near and far side boundary, and sometimes visible from Earth, the crew suggested Carroll crater in honor of Reid Wiseman’s late wife, Carroll Taylor Wiseman. After this mission is complete, the crater name proposals will be formally submitted to the International Astronomical Union, the organization that governs the naming of celestial bodies and their surface features.
On April 1, NASA successfully launched humanity’s first crewed trip around the Moon in more than 50 years. A couple of days into the mission, attention turned to a more mundane problem when reports said the astronauts had access to "two Microsoft Outlooks" and neither was working properly. By April 4, the crew had passed 100,000 miles from Earth as they continued deeper into space, and by April 6, they had entered the Moon’s gravitational pull and caught their first views of the lunar far side.

My god

By know-nothing cunt • Score: 5, Funny Thread

It’s full of Outlooks.

Information lacking from summary/article

By swillden • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Artemis II is breaking Apollo 13’s record by about 4100 miles. The primary reason they’re going further is because they’re passing much farther from the moon, about 4000 miles, compared to 158 miles for Apollo 13. The moon is also a little further from Earth, accounting for the other 250 miles.

Re:humanity

By Ed_1024 • Score: 5, Funny Thread
They went ~4000 miles further past the moon than in the 1970s. With the Artemis program clocking in at $93B so far, that makes it only ~$23M for each extra mile. This is an extreme bargain considering HS2 in the UK is running at >$600M a mile and is only a railway line. Bravo to NASA!

Easier than Apollo

By fred6666 • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

From what I understand their flyby is much easier (requires to power to come back) compared to orbiting around the moon like previous Apollo missions.
Unless their calculation is wrong and they miss the moon, they don’t need any power to come back to the earth’s orbit, they are pushed back using the moon’s gravitational force.
It’s a much greater technological accomplishment to be able to orbit around the moon and make a few turn, and then choose to turn on propulsion when you are ready to go back to the earth, even if you remain closer to the earth (because you are closer to the moon).

Re:humanity

By ArchieBunker • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Gas prices are up globally because orange jesus made the middle east situation that much worse. It’s also laughable how suddenly they care very much about the plight of the Iranian people while simultaneously cheering at masked men snatching people from the streets and transporting them to concentration camps.

I double checked your figures and you are correct. You know what’s also funny? $5.25 trilion was collected in 2025.

In 2024 $4.92 trillion was collected.

How do you feel about you tax increase courtesy of Trump?

Samsung’s Messages App Is Shutting Down

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Samsung says it will discontinue its Samsung Messages app in July 2026 and is directing Galaxy users to switch to Google Messages instead. Android Central reports:
[…] Samsung says users can switch to Google Messages as their default app to maintain a consistent Android messaging experience. The fine print also states that once the app is discontinued, “sending messages via Samsung Messages on your phone will no longer be possible, except for emergency service numbers or emergency contacts defined in your device.”

Samsung also notes that users will no longer be able to download the Messages app from the Galaxy Store once it is discontinued. Newer devices, including the Galaxy S26 series, already do not support installing Samsung Messages. It is, however, worth noting that users on Android 11 or older are not affected by this change and will still be able to use the Samsung Messages app on their devices.

[…] Samsung also warns that on some devices released before 2022, switching apps may temporarily disrupt ongoing RCS conversations. However, chats should resume once both users move to Google Messages. The company also highlights some of the benefits of the switch, including improved security, RCS support, AI features, and better multi-device connectivity.

Everyone has their own message app

By Luckyo • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Everyone has their own message app, and outside US, almost no one uses it for anything other than SMS. For everything else, it’s Whatsapp, Telegram, WeChat, Signal, etc.

It’s interesting that google and other phone manufacturers lost this fight so comprehensively.

Re: Messages app?

By devslash0 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

It’s a part of their forced app suite preinstalled on their phone that you can never fully switch off.

Best you can do, and what most people do, is create a separate folder in the launcher, shove all the apps there and ignore them as they all deserve to be, bloody useless bloatware.

Re:And nothing of value was lost…

By thegarbz • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

If a third party client existed then it would work just fine. RCS is an open and clearly defined standard, and even iMessages supports it. Samsung users had no problem receiving or sending RCS, Apple users had no problem receiving RCS, and Google has no “control” over RCS as that standard is managed by the GSMA and it’s 750 members much like nearly every other aspect of your phone.

Samsung apps are all like this

By DrXym • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
I had to set up a Samsung A56 recently, and 90% of the setup was removing shit Samsung put on there that NOBODY asked for or wants - Samsung browser, their app store, their fitness tracker, their payment system, their assistant Bixby, malware called “AppCloud”, a bunch of placeholders for Microsoft Office, Onedrive, Facebook, X, LinkedIn etc. Just absolute garbage that has to be removed to make the phone usable and fit for purpose. Some apps can’t be uninstalled, only disabled. Some of the Samsung backend services can’t even be disabled either despite serving no purpose.

The worst app is “AppCloud” which is a trojan/malware that automatically installs “curated” software on devices without consent. It slips into the setup sequence asking for consent when people are already habituated to clicking through screens to make their phone work. Did I mention it was made by an Israeli company called ironSource? It’s one of those bits of software that cannot be removed so it’s always there and I believe many people do not know how to turn it off. God knows what data it is harvesting, or the risk especially for people using Samsung devices in countries that are not friendly to Israel.

Re:And nothing of value was lost…

By Tony Isaac • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Well, to be fair, Apple users had problems sending and receiving RCS until Google made a huge stink. But of course that was not a standards issue, it was a marketing issue.

Germany Doxes ‘UNKN,’ Head of RU Ransomware Gangs REvil, GandCrab

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from KrebsOnSecurity:
An elusive hacker who went by the handle “UNKN” and ran the early Russian ransomware groups GandCrab and REvil now has a name and a face. Authorities in Germany say 31-year-old Russian Daniil Maksimovich Shchukin headed both cybercrime gangs and helped carry out at least 130 acts of computer sabotage and extortion against victims across the country between 2019 and 2021. Shchukin was named as UNKN (a.k.a. UNKNOWN) in an advisory published by the German Federal Criminal Police (the “Bundeskriminalamt” or BKA for short). The BKA said Shchukin and another Russian — 43-year-old Anatoly Sergeevitsch Kravchuk — extorted nearly $2 million euros across two dozen cyberattacks that caused more than 35 million euros in total economic damage.

Germany’s BKA said Shchukin acted as the head of one of the largest worldwide operating ransomware groups GandCrab and REvil, which pioneered the practice of double extortion — charging victims once for a key needed to unlock hacked systems, and a separate payment in exchange for a promise not to publish stolen data. Shchukin’s name appeared in a Feb. 2023 filing (PDF) from the U.S. Justice Department seeking the seizure of various cryptocurrency accounts associated with proceeds from the REvil ransomware gang’s activities. The government said the digital wallet tied to Shchukin contained more than $317,000 in ill-gotten cryptocurrency.
The BKA believes Shchukin resides in Krasnodar, Russia, where he is from. “Based on the investigations so far, it is assumed that the wanted person is abroad, presumably in Russia,” the BKA advised. “Travel behavior cannot be ruled out.”

Re:What???

By mjwx • Score: 4, Informative Thread

No, we speak English and bad English here. Is that like English NG?

-making sad typos when critiquing grammar or spelling is king of ironic, don’t ya think?

Jokes aside, I think the point is this isn’t really a doxxing. Doxxing is an unauthorised release of personal information (usually with the intent to cause harm), this is really the opposite as it’s a state releasing the name of a wanted criminal.

Re:What???

By godel_56 • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Jokes aside, I think the point is this isn’t really a doxxing. Doxxing is an unauthorised release of personal information (usually with the intent to cause harm), this is really the opposite as it’s a state releasing the name of a wanted criminal.

No, I think it’s a real doxxing. The German authorities know they have little chance of getting their hands on the crims themselves because Russia, but instead they release their identity (complete with photos) and expose them to the attention of interested parties in their own country. These may include other criminals looking to persuade them to share some of their several million Euros/Dollars in accumulated funds, possibly assisted by bolt cutters and a blow torch, and maybe the Russian government themselves.

The Russians may not care about the criminality involved, but seeing a chance to get a couple of extra million to boost their failing economy in the wake of the war with Ukraine, the opportunity may be hard to pass up.

More Americans Are Breaking Into the Upper Middle Class

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
More Americans have moved into upper-middle-class incomes over the past several decades (source paywalled; alternative source), with new research suggesting that group has grown sharply while the lower and core middle class have shrunk. The Wall Street Journal reports:
In 2024, about 31% of Americans were part of the upper middle class, up from about 10% in 1979, according to a report released this year by the right-leaning American Enterprise Institute. There is no single, standard definition of middle class, or upper middle class, and what counts as a hefty income in one city can feel paltry in another. The AEI report, by Stephen Rose and Scott Winship, classified a family of three earning $133,000 to $400,000 in 2024 dollars as upper middle class. Households earning more were categorized as rich. The analysis looked just at incomes, not assets such as stocks or real estate.

[…] The gains span generations. Many baby boomers, born to parents who grew up in the Great Depression, are living well on their savings, aided by steady Social Security checks and decades of stock-portfolio gains that they can now tap. Millennials, who everyone worried would be permanently set back by the 2008-09 financial crisis, are earning solid incomes, buying homes and surpassing their parents. Many families are surprised to find that they have moved into this new economic tier, and see themselves as comfortable, not rich. They tend to have jobs that are white collar but not flashy — think accountants, not tech founders.

This doesn’t mean that all Americans are climbing the ladder. Entrenched inflation and higher prices on major necessities have pushed many families closer to the financial edge, or locked them out of homeownership. Those costs weigh on high-earning families too, and for many are the reason they don’t feel wealthy. The AEI report divided families into five different groups by income. Three groups were in the middle: lower middle class, core middle class and upper middle class. The authors found that more families now fall into the two highest-earning groups — upper middle class and rich — and fewer fall into the three lower-earning categories.

Re:Found another commie troll account

By nomadic • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Nonsequitur.

“More Americans have been entering upper middle class” is not inconsistent with “the economy has not improved over the past few years.”

Re:Good

By Frobnicator • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Seems you’re missing the point. The article says anyone over 133K was classified as upper middle class, and ignored the location. We agree on that bit.

They counted millions of people who are low income for their region and even potentially on welfare as being upper middle class. They said 10% of the population was upper middle class in 1979 by one metric, but then using a different metric that 31% were upper middle class in 2024. They wrongly and quite openly counted millions of households with welfare level incomes, lower class incomes, and middle class incomes and claimed they were in the upper middle class. Everything that follows from the conclusion that upper middle class has grown so much is fundamentally flawed.

A huge amount of the population are millionaires if we define a millionaire as someone with thousands of dollars. That’s effectively what they did here. Count millions of household that middle, lower, and welfare-level as though they’re upper middle class, and suddenly the upper middle class triples in size. The claims that follow that the lower rungs of the middle class are garbage because they just reclassified them as upper middle class, even though by the author’s own admission they are not.

Re:Really?

By nealric • Score: 5, Informative Thread

These numbers are for two different things. “Upper income” is just a measure of income. “Upper class” includes other factors that may influence a person’s place in society. Someone making $170k (at least in 2022 dollars) is upper income in the context of Pew, but they would not necessarily have the indicators of being “upper class” (i.e. being in upper management or other influential position, significant property ownership, being close to political power) in a high cost of living area like Manhattan where that income might represent a blue collar couple. Class is impossible to measure objectively.

Disingenuous

By CAIMLAS • Score: 5, Informative Thread

They’re defining upper middle class as " family of three earning $133,000 to $400,000 per year”. So that’s 2 middle aged adults + an adult child as the upper barrier.

What’s that mean for your typical “family of 2”? Do they normalize on 3 incomes and play funny with the figures, using extrapolation for the third?

Because the cost of living has increased. $133k is going to just barely buy you a house in most of the country. Is starter home ownership “upper middle class”?

Absolutely not.

This is just inflation, and a disingenuous bullshit article in the NYT (as you can expect, at best). The middle class is markedly smaller, not larger, and they’re just using old income brackets to define “upper middle class”.

Re:Good

By Tony Isaac • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I have a son who’s in this category, unable to pay a $500 emergency expense. It is *NOT* because he doesn’t make enough money. It’s because if there’s money in his account, he thinks he has money to spend. Therefore, his account is always below $500. He and his wife have $400 smartwatches, streaming subscriptions galore, two cars, and gadgets everywhere.

I suspect many Americans who can’t pay for a $500 emergency expense are in this category. They haven’t learned how to budget, or the importance of setting aside money for a rainy day.

Grandma’s advice about money is still good. People have just forgotten to pay attention to her.

Peter Thiel Is Betting Big On Solar-Powered Cow Collars

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot
Halter, a New Zealand agtech startup now valued at $2 billion, has raised $220 million to expand its AI-powered cattle management system. “Halter is now valued at $2 billion following the Series E, which was led by Peter Thiel’s Founders Fund with participation from Blackbird, DCVC, Bond, Bessemer, and several others,” reports Inc. From the report:
Halter plans to use the funding to expand its existing footprint in the U.S., Australia, and New Zealand, as well as to grow into new markets such as Ireland, the U.K., and parts of North and South America. The round is one of the biggest to-date in the industry, and comes amid growing adoption of the technology among U.S. ranchers. According to Halter, U.S. ranchers have erected some 60,000 miles of virtual fencing since the company’s launch in 2024.

Halter’s technology works through a system of solar-powered collars and in-pasture towers that collect data — some 6,000 data points per collar per minute — from grazing cattle and feed it into a cloud-based platform and app for farmers. The collars are ergonomically designed to be comfortable for the cattle wearing them, and leverage AI to play audio cues or vibrate when it is time to move to a different grazing location or if they step outside of a predetermined zone. The collars can also deliver an electric pulse if an animal does not respond.

Halter’s app also creates a digital twin of a ranch, which essentially means a digital replica that leverages real-time data to accurately reflect conditions. Farmers can consult the app to check on their herd, or fence, and move cattle with just a few clicks. Halter also has a proprietary algorithm that it calls a “Cowgorithm” trained on seven billion hours of animal behavior. Altogether, this technology is meant to make ranchers’ lives easier when herding cattle, help them save money on building physical fencing, and provide insights about pasture management to improve soil health and pasture productivity. Halter says some 2,000 farmers and ranchers currently use its tech worldwide.

This idea seems solid

By hdyoung • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
I’ve got plenty of gripes about Thiel, and the 2-billion dollar valuation is the standard I-estimate-my-company-as-being-worth-all-teh-mmmoonnaayyy.

But this idea seems solid and worth pursuing. It’s a real market, for real goods, that probably could benefit from some tech. There’s use case is extremely low on buzzwords. No AI. No blockchain. No crypto. Just a solid case for a hardware/software system that could probably improve actual physical productivity in an easily measurable way. The argument for using cloud infrastructure is pretty compelling.

The kicker is if costs can be low enough to justify, that’s a LOT of fairly advanced hardware to purchase, install, and deal with wear and tear in an aggressive outdoor physical environment, in order to get my cows to grow 20 percent better. Is it worth it? I have no clue, but that’s gonna be the main question to answer. Agriculture is a very-low-bullsh&t industry.

To the people who are griping about Thiel planning to use this on humans. Your worries are 5 years too late. We’re already shackled to devices that monitor and occasionally prod us in various directions. They’re about 7cm by 14cm by 1cm and we THINK that we’re the ones in control but who are we kidding?

Re:This idea seems solid

By swillden • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

But this idea seems solid and worth pursuing. It’s a real market, for real goods, that probably could benefit from some tech.

Agreed. I live in the mountain west, and our forest and mountain landscapes are just covered with fencing, even though most of it is public land, because it’s BLM “multi-use” land — a lot of cattle graze on it. Fences are expensive to build and expensive to maintain. If you think a fence is something you build once and then ignore, you’ve never dealt with cattle.

Cowboys (and sheep herders) have a term “ride fence” as in “Bob, you’re gonna ride fence today”, and it’s a regular and tedious task that means “get on your horse (or ATV) and ride past miles and miles of fenceline, looking for places where the fence is broken or going to break, and fixing them”. It’s necessary and expensive drudgery and having all of those fencelines is bad for other uses, and bad for wildlife. I’ve put down a few deer that jumped a barbed wire fence and didn’t quite clear it, slicing their guts open and leaving them in agony as they slowly die.

In addition, there’s an obvious tension between the cost of building and maintaining fences and the cost of rounding up cattle when it’s time to move them. Obviously if you slice the land up into lots of small fenced areas, the cattle will be easy to find — but they’re also going to graze it out fast, so you’re going to have to move them more often. If you use very large enclosures (common on BLM land), then your cows may have hundreds of square miles to roam and feed… but when it’s time to move them you have to find them. Luckily they’re herd animals so when you find a few you’ve found them all, but still. And occasionally, singles get separated from the herd and you just lose them, which isn’t great since a cow is worth about $2k.

So… if we can replace those miles of expensive and constantly-breaking fences with virtual fences, that’s good news for everyone. Wildlife and outdoorsmen can roam unimpeded, cattle can be far more tightly controlled, strays quickly identified, located and reunited with the herd — via remote control!. This is an innovative idea that is worth quite a lot.

Re:This idea seems solid

By cecst • Score: 5, Informative Thread
Agreed also. Cattle rancher here in Central Texas with certified organic ranch and cattle. Another advantage is implementing rotational grazing, in which the herd(s) are moved every day or so to fresh grass. Doing so with fencing requires either a lot of fixed fencing or movable electric fencing. The first is expensive in materials and upkeep, the second in labor (moving the fencing every time the herd is moved). Virtual fencing is an excellent solution.
Another advantage to rotational grazing for organic ranching is that the life cycle of worms requires reingestion of fecal material into a new host within 30 days. By making sure the herd never returns to a given area within that interval removes the need for de-worming agents (which we can’t use-we accept decreased growth or treat and then sell severely infected animals). This is good for non-organic ranchers also because routine use of de-worming agents leads to parasite resistance.
Another advantage for all ranchers is tracking cattle. Cows about to deliver will often go off from the herd into isolated parts of the pasture. If they run into trouble and need help with delivery, the rancher first has to find them. With this technology, the rancher can set up a separate virtual paddock and give the cow(s) separation from the herd while retaining the ability to keep an eye on her/them.
For me, the issues are cost and proprietary software. The cost is naturally high, about $350-500 per animal for the equipment and an annual monitoring fee. That’s pretty steep for me since my profit margin is low (organic certification alone is expensive). And, the devices communicate with a proprietary service. If the company goes out of business or decides to stop the service, the hardware becomes useless. I don’t think I’ll be buying the equipment until I find a work-around for that problem.

Re:Get a Border Collie

By tlhIngan • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

The border collie helps round up the cattle but it would be easier if the rancher knows where the cattle are located to send out the collie. Some ranches can be hundreds of thousands of acres. And that is the main herd. If there are stragglers, they have to be located too.

Border collies generally work with sheep, cows not as much simply because cows don’t really give a damn.

But sheep you have to be careful with - an entire flock in the UK had to be euthanized because they figured how to escape their fencing, and if that knowledge spread, it would basically render all farms using that fencing to keep sheep worthless. They apparently are very good at teaching fellow sheep things like that, and it was only a matter of time before the one or two that figured out how to escape taught the rest of the flock, and that flock would then teach neighboring flocks on neighboring farms and so on. It was cheaper to euthanize the flock than to have the entire country’s farms re-fenced.

Re: Get a Border Collie

By caseih • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

It really does work. My family’s ranch has been using a similar product called e-shepherd for a couple of years now. Doesn’t take the cattle very long to learn what they collars want them to do.