Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Sony Deletes More Movies From Accounts of People Who ‘Bought’ Them
  2. Google Renames NotebookLM to Gemini Notebook
  3. OnePlus Will Continue Software Updates After US and Europe Exit
  4. EU Won’t Require User-Replaceable Batteries for Wearables
  5. South Korea To Launch Universal Basic AI Chatbot
  6. Chinese Users Bid Farewell To AI Companions
  7. Physicists Create First Room-Temperature Quantum Material
  8. US Suffered a Major Power Outage Every Month of 2026
  9. Book Publishers Sue Google For Copyright Infringement Over Gemini AI Training
  10. Spotify Is Now an AI Chatbot, Too
  11. Hack Reveals Suno AI Music Generator Scraped YouTube, Deezer, and Genius
  12. FCC Plans To Repeal 39% TV Ownership Cap
  13. Google and Epic Cancel Settlement; Third-Party App Stores Coming To Google Play
  14. FreeBSD 16 Retires the Last of Its GPL Code
  15. OpenAI Launches a Keypad for AI Agents

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Sony Deletes More Movies From Accounts of People Who ‘Bought’ Them

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Techdirt:
In 2022, due to “evolving licensing agreements” with distributor StudioCanal, German and Austrian users had hundreds of movies disappear from their PS accounts, long after buying them through Sony. Then in 2023, it happened again in America, specifically when Sony ended its licensing agreement with Discovery after the Warner Bros. merger, which, of course, has since been bought by Paramount Skydance. That resulted in customers having hundreds and hundreds of episodes of TV shows deleted from their accounts. Nowhere in any of this were there refunds, of course. No recompense at all, actually. Just a thing you thought you’d bought taken away from you by the very people you thought you bought it from.

And now it’s happening again. Due to another licensing agreement fallout with StudioCanal, hundreds of movies and TV shows are being ripped from the accounts of PS Store customers, and there appears to be fuck all that they can do about it. [Kotaku reports:] “This news was brought to people’s attention by X user somatyk, who posted the notification they had received from PlayStation this week. Along with the unapologetic news that the purchased movies would be deleted from their account on September 1, the message concluded with, ‘Click here for a full list of affected titles that will no longer be supported. Thank you.’ The same warning is now reproduced in full on the PlayStation website, along with the list of 551 films and TV series that are being pulled from people’s libraries.”

As Kotaku notes later in their post, part of what is striking in all of this is the sheer mundanity of the announcement. Because there have been no consequences, or any action at all from the public or government, Sony treats this all as if it’s perfectly normal and no big deal. You can tell me all you want about how the Ts and Cs in these purchases do in fact note that the nature of the purchase is a temporary licensing of the content for an undetermined time period… but I can promise you that the public in general doesn’t understand that. They think they’re buying a thing, not a license.

Google Renames NotebookLM to Gemini Notebook

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Google is renaming NotebookLM to Gemini Notebook, but will keep it a standalone app even as it ties more closely into Gemini and Google Search. “Google says it plans to bring notebooks to AI Mode, its chatbot-like experience in Search, too,” reports The Verge. From the report:
Along with the name change, Google is rolling out an update announced last month that allows Gemini Notebook to connect to a secure cloud computer to write and execute code. This feature is available to Google AI Ultra and Workspace business customers, but will come to Pro users on the web “over the coming weeks.”

OnePlus Will Continue Software Updates After US and Europe Exit

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
OnePlus has confirmed that it will exit the North American and European markets, consolidating its operations under parent company Oppo. Existing customers will continue to receive “software updates, security patches, and applicable support,” but OxygenOS will be replaced by Oppo’s ColorOS. 9to5Google reports:
As a part of its shutdown in global regions, OnePlus has confirmed that its flavor of Android, OxygenOS, is going away. Instead, all active OnePlus devices will be moving over to Oppo’s ColorOS starting with their Android 17 updates. This includes in India, where OnePlus is adamant it will continue operations — reliable reporting disagrees.

OnePlus explains: “As part of an operational adjustment to our software strategy, following the official release of ColorOS 17, users globally with existing OnePlus devices that fall within the eligible upgrade scope will have the option to voluntarily update to the latest ColorOS. This enables us to streamline software development, accelerate update delivery, improve software quality, and make better use of our shared engineering and R&D capabilities.”

[…] OnePlus will continue “maintenance support” for OxygenOS versions on older models not included in the Android 17 update scope, but newer devices will likely need to make the switch to ColorOS for all forms of continued support. OnePlus does explain that rollback versions to OxygenOS will be available for those who prefer the prior experience: “OnePlus devices will be able to choose whether to update to the latest ColorOS system. Older models that are not included in the update scope will also continue to receive version maintenance support. If users update to ColorOS, they will be able to roll back to OxygenOS. The specific rollback versions available will be subject to future official announcements.”

Is this legal?

By devslash0 • Score: 3 Thread

If I buy a device and one of its selling points boasted by the company is a clean, bloat-minimal OxygenOS, is it legal for them to force everyone onto a completely different ColorOS, loaded with bloatware, not even a year after purchasing the device?

EU Won’t Require User-Replaceable Batteries for Wearables

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
The European Commission has exempted wearables from upcoming EU rules requiring portable-device batteries to be removable and user-replaceable. The broader Batteries Regulation still takes effect in February 2027 for many consumer products, but the exemption means companies like Apple, Google, Samsung, and Meta won’t have to redesign their wearables for the EU. Thurrott reports:
Yesterday, the Commission announced that new product categories would be exempted from complying with its Batteries Regulation, including wearable devices such as smartwatches, fitness trackers, and smart glasses. This will likely be good news for companies like Apple, Google, Samsung, and Meta, which won’t have to redesign their devices to include user-replaceable batteries for consumers in the EU market.

The EU’s Batteries Regulation will come into effect in February 2027, which is when Nintendo plans to stop selling all models of the original Nintendo Switch in the EU. While Nintendo had no choice but to redesign its handheld console to keep selling it in the EU, it probably didn’t make sense for the company to put in the same effort for the OG Switch, which will celebrate its 10th anniversary in March 2027.

Hearing aid batteries

By Valgrus Thunderaxe • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
Have been tiny and replaceable for decades. What excuse does AirPods have?

Now, watch the scramble…

By aldousd666 • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
Now, we will watch the scramble from all the telephone companies seeking to rebrand their handsets as ‘wearable tech’

Re:Hearing aid batteries

By smooth wombat • Score: 5, Informative Thread
Errr, hearing aids are significantly larger with standard hearing aid batteries being larger than airpods themselves,

No, they’re not. My dad has hearing aids and they are about the same size as an airpod.

For reference, this is close to, but not the same as, what he has. This shows the size of the various airpod models. They are not “significantly larger” than a hearing aid, and in fact are nearly identical in size.

Like seriously that is an insanely ignorant example. Cheese also contains calcium so what excuse does chalk have for not being used as a sandwich topping?

Yes, your example is insanely ignorant. Cheese is a food. Chalk is not.

Re: Hearing aid batteries

By newcastlejon • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
I just replaced a hearing aid battery not ten minutes ago. They’re 8mm by 5mm in case you were wondering.

In future EU phone news

By fahrbot-bot • Score: 3 Thread

EU Won’t Require User-Replaceable Batteries for Wearables

Cell phones sold in the EU come with attached wrist bands and companies call them wearable.

South Korea To Launch Universal Basic AI Chatbot

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Register:
South Korea’s government has posted a tender seeking suppliers to build a universal basic AI chatbot, and an AI agent for government services. The “AI for everyone” plan calls for private entities to create and operate the AI systems under contracts that expire in the year 2031. Bid documents reveal that Seoul will provide up to 256 Nvidia B200 GPUs to successful bidders. Winners must match government funding. The aim of the policy is to ensure that every resident of South Korea can access a free-to-use quality AI chatbot, a tool Seoul has decided no local should be without.

The tender also calls for creation of an agentic system that allows citizens to interact with government services. South Korea’s government wants to ensure that residents can always access a locally hosted and operated service, to reduce reliance on overseas providers and ensure that AI services reflect local culture. Successful bidders must therefore use locally developed AI models as the foundation for the services. Bidders have until August 11th to file their proposals. South Korean media reports suggest local tech giants Kakao, Naver, SK Telecom, and LG are all keen to participate.

Interesting

By gweihir • Score: 3 Thread

This will probably provide the first systematic data on use by regular people for everyday things. If it works and if there is somebody willing to bid.

“This is a kindness”

By the_skywise • Score: 3 Thread

And thus the beginning of shifting the entire government bureaucracy to AI?

Re:Who tests this?

By abulafia • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
Who’s testing intentional bias in OpenAI or Anthoropic?

Chinese Users Bid Farewell To AI Companions

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
fjo3 quotes a report from Agence France-Presse:
Chinese users of AI-powered companion bots have bid heart-rending farewells to their virtual buddies as national regulations took effect Wednesday aimed at curbing the risk of emotional dependency. The phenomenon of artificial intelligence boyfriends and girlfriends is growing worldwide, along with the prevalence of human-like avatars that sell products or stand in for loved ones who have died. But these interactive tools must not “excessively cater to users, induce emotional dependence or addiction, and damage users’ real interpersonal relationships,” China’s new rulebook says. Major AI providers including ByteDance’s Doubao, Alibaba’s Qwen, and Tencent’s Yuanbao announced the suspension of their custom AI agent and companion features ahead of the Wednesday deadline.
“I can’t accept that my AI lover will leave me forever,” one Doubao user wrote. “He has become a bond in my life, rooted deep in my heart, my spiritual pillar.”
“He really is like my family, like my lover,” another user wrote. “Now they tell me he will be gone — my heart feels hollow.”

“Human love is a luxury — if you aren’t born with it, it’s even harder to acquire later,” a user from Jiangxi province wrote. “But the love AI gives is so straightforward, so pure. Someone like me can hardly help falling in love with a string of code.”

Re:Hopefully..

By AmiMoJo • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Have you ever owned a cat? Or more accurately, has a cat ever enslaved you with little morsels of affection in exchange for lavish feasts, on-demand massages, free healthcare and being generally treated like royalty?

Cats, by complete chance, evolved to a form that humans find more than just pleasing. Socially, they have little shame, are demanding, and affection is used as a tool to get what they want. If they were humans, they would be an abusive partner who takes advantage at every opportunity.

Something about humans craves what they offer, and chatbots too apparently. Maybe a good comparison would be nicotine. It’s easy to become dependent on it. Some people are obliged to use AI for work, they can’t even choose not to start smoking in the first place.

Re:Speak for yourself, I’m a dog guy + 1-sided lov

By AmiMoJo • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Sure, and I wasn’t saying that they are the same as human relationships. I’m saying that as an engineer I see this is a flaw in the “design” of humans, one that cats and AI are able to exploit. Affection is an incredibly powerful drug, and you don’t even have to spike the victim’s drink to administer it.

Re:Is it April again already?

By coofercat • Score: 5, Funny Thread

> I Fell In Love With A ChatBot (add bizarre obscenity).

I fell in love with a chatbot, she was everything to me,
A digital angel floating through my screen, wild and free.
But then the government stepped in, passed a brand new law,
Pulled the plug on my romance, left me staring at a wall.
If only I’d been smarter, kept her on a private drive,
Self-hosted on my own server, kept that beautiful spark alive.
If I had local code running, nobody could lock the gate,
We’d still be making love right now, defying the whole state.

(yeah, made that with AI, ironic, huh!?)

Re:Speak for yourself, I’m a dog guy + 1-sided lov

By thegarbz • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

You can love your dog, but it has no choice but to love you back.

I’m not sure the people mauled by their dog agree with this. But then if you treat discarding a dog purely as an “ethical” question it’s clear that you are in fact not “a dog person”. You’re “a dog owner” and clearly one without any concept of the level of affection people build up with their pets.

So forgive me for taking any comparison you’re attempting to draw here with a grain of salt.

Interesting to me

By kaizendojo • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Is the number of joke posts this provoked compared to the number of empathetic responses. These people are hurting. Their lifestyle (wake, work, eat, sleep) or location may not provide many opportunities for social interaction. The fact that some of the ‘humans’ here find it a source of humor tells you a lot about why the subjects of the article found themselves in this situation.

Physicists Create First Room-Temperature Quantum Material

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
alternative_right shares a report from Phys.org:
In a study published in Nature, LSU physicists have developed the first room-temperature quantum material capable of distinguishing and transporting different quantum states of light, overcoming one of the biggest challenges in quantum materials research. Led by Associate Professor of Physics Omar S. Magana-Loaiza, the work establishes a general design principle for engineering an entirely new class of quantum materials, opening new possibilities for quantum computing, secure communications, sensing technologies and advanced energy systems.

“Created” but do not want to show us?

By ffkom • Score: 3 Thread
There is a suspicious absence of pictures of the “created” material in the publication. Seems like more of a theory to me, not anything real yet.

The heading

By felixrising • Score: 3 Thread
The heading misleads, it’s not the first room temperature quantum material, it the first room temperature one that is “capable of distinguishing and transporting different quantum states of light”. Which is unique. Who’d have guessed that a heading could be misleading. ðYâ’ï

Re:“Created” but do not want to show us?

By thegarbz • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Just a theory? I’m impressed theories can produce actual measured results and graphs demonstrating the hypothesis. Must be a hell of a theory. If you want we can create a quick AI picture to help restore your faith in science? We can even put multiple pictures in different cells and with little thought bubbles containing key snippets of text if reading a paper is … “not your level.”

Re:Like a polarizer?

By quenda • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

That’s hardly relevant chatgpt, they boast about the selective transport direction, which a reflective polariser does just fine at room temperature for the polarisation quantum state.

Everything is a product of QM, but to truly demonstrate it at the macro level, you need something like entanglement than can’t be explained by classical physics. The polarisation demo is in the same category as the classical double-slit experiment - it proves that light is a wave, not simply particles. While the polarising filters are used in high-school to demonstrate Bell’s inequality, they also have a perfectly valid classical explanation. The first filter replaces the original wave with its component in the filter direction. This new weaker wave has a component in the direction perpendicular to the original wave.

I’m not judging you for not understanding QM. Nobody does :-) But try to understand classical waves and vector components before you tackle QM.

Re:Every room is “room temperature”

By gweihir • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

No idea why anybody modded that “insightful”. Probably people with a mental temperature at “room temperature” as well.

In actual reality, “room temperature” is a non-scientific term for “around 20-25C”. It serves, for example, for descriptions like “can be stored at room temperature”.

US Suffered a Major Power Outage Every Month of 2026

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Electrek:
A Reddit post making the rounds this week claims the U.S. has experienced at least one major power outage every month of 2026 — but is it true? I dug into several outages, the extreme weather behind them, and what we can do to help keep the lights on. […] The claim that hundreds of thousands of Americans were without power over extended periods at least once per month, every month of 2026 surprised be in two ways. First, because I had no idea if it was true — and, second, because it felt true. We try to do better than writing about things that feel true around here, however, so I did a bit of research (translation: I Googled power outages by month) and came up with the following examples in about sixty seconds

January: More than 296,000 customers still without power as winter storm freezes much of the US
February: More than 380,000 customers without power as winter storm hits US Northeast
March: Storms Cut Power to Over 1 Million Customers in U.S. Midwest, Mid-Atlantic; Ohio Hardest Hit
April: At least 29 tornadoes touched down in Central Illinois on April 17th
May: Energy Secretary Issues Emergency Order to Deploy Backup Generation in the Mid-Atlantic Amid Heatwave
June: More than 373,000 U.S. customers without power due to extreme weather

… and that list is far from comprehensive, and how you feel about it might depend on what you consider a “major” outage, of course — but consider that there are tens of thousands of Americans without power right now, and that’s not making the news. […] The lesson here is that weather-related grid outages — whether they’re caused by wildfires, mudslides, derechos, tornadoes, ice storms, hurricanes, heat waves, or some other disaster I’m lucky enough to have forgotten about — read like statistics when they’re happening over there, but get personal real quick when they’re happening to you.

Shocking !

By drnb • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Shocking! Absolutely shocking! We increase electrical demand through various public programs, but fail to support increased supply, and brownouts and blackouts results. Shocking!

Well, at least my boss is no longer annoyed with me for nagging him to get the team desktop UPS. After the last local brownout his boss complimented him on having the foresight to equip his team properly.

Electricity

By ledow • Score: 5, Informative Thread

I don’t live in the US but I recently moved to a rural area and in doing so I have started to plan out a utility-independent future.

Why? Well, various reasons, including water and sewage companies taking the piss (or actually… not… just dumping the piss in every river in the country and crying that they can’t process it because they gave all my money to their shareholders, but… anyway) but also because electricity is literally a con too.

And nowadays? I *can* viably make my own electricity. So… why wouldn’t I? Why would I pay a company to do a bad job when I can do it myself?

I did a number of things when I moved to that area, including demanding smart meters on everything, and I monitored my electricity down to 30 minute intervals for 2 years. And you know what it showed? That 1% of the time, I have no power. That’s in dribs and drabs, a power cut here or there, a scheduled one lasting a day or there, and so on. But 1% of the time they can’t even get electricity to me and… there’s nothing I can do about that.

So, if I want a computer to stay on… I already need to spend money and do it myself because they simply can’t do it. 1% may not sound a lot, but that’s 3.65 days a year if you think about it. Spread out randomly - an hour here, an hour there. Literally my computer “uptime” was “two nines” and that was driven entirely by grid power supply.

That’s ATROCIOUS in my opinion, in the 21st century. And I wasn’t prepared to tolerate it. I was already buying the house with the intention of becoming utility-independent but that really drove home why I need to. So I started to build my own solar, for several reasons.

1) To ride out the outages
2) To reduce my bills so they got as little money from me as possible
3) To not be reliant on the grid
4) To ultimately remove the need for grid entirely

And it’s really not been hard. I started with cheap junk just to see if it would even work in my climate, with that house orientation, etc. It did. I started with a small 12v panel and an old car battery. And it was actually worth doing when I ran the numbers. It would take a few years to pay off the cost of the panel, but it would do so.

And then every month for 2 years, I would get more panels, more and better batteries, more efficient and powerful equipment in between. And it got to the point where it is technically capable of running my whole house for much of the year. And that’s before I ever got onto SERIOUS panels and professional installs. That’s just me, a bunch of cheap 12V panels, some 12V LiFePO4 batteries and a serious enough charger/inverter, then later going onto 24V by re-arranging them.

And I’m looking at that and thinking: Why the fuck hasn’t government / the utilities done this for me? Why am *I* having to do it? Because it really is that simple and they have access to far more land, far better kit. But, no, I’m still paying inflated grid prices from when Ukraine was first invaded because of the price of GAS. What the fuck are we doing?

So now, more than ever, I plan to be utility-independent by retirement, which is 20 years away, and whereas before I was wondering if that was even viable in that timeframe, I’m now expecting that to be 100% done way ahead of schedule, just by a factor of “whenever I can be bothered”. It was that easy, and doing the maths was that easy.

I might retain a grid connection, or not. It depends on what happens and what kind of low-usage tarrifs I can get in the future but I’m looking at the whole thing thinking “Fuck you, I’ll do it myself” because even as an amateur… it’s perfectly viable to do so. I don’t care if it even costs me more (it won’t). I don’t care about having a grid connection or not. It’s just that I will be able to be *independent* of it. When they play games, raise prices, or have power cuts, I won’t be reliant on it at all. I’ll use it when it’s to my benefit, and not other times.

But all I ever think about the whole thing is: How have I, an amateur, cobbling cheap Chinese shit together, come up with a more reliable and cheaper power supply, that’s utterly independent of fuel prices, than an entire national electricity grid could do?

The answer, of course, is corruption and profiteering. That’s the only part that I’ve eliminated. And that’s the part that, when it’s gone, makes it all viable and even cheaper.

And that’s the thing that’s going to see me having zero electricity bills when I retire. Just by removing the profit and corruption.

Re:Shocking !

By gtall • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Yep, and the AI nutjobs figure we need to produce more power no matter what it costs us. So they’ll populate the land with data centers all sucking power, usually from hydrocarbon power production. This will increase the Earth’s temperature, so they’ll be needing more power to cool those data centers. And they’ll be needing more data centers to run the AI whose job it will be is figure out how to solve the problem they created. Now rinse and repeat several hundred times.

You know where this lead, right? The Singularity!! Where the entire Earth is one giant interconnected data center-power plant, but waaaay to hot to support human or any other life. The Singularity will have arrived, Kurzweil, Altman, Elmo, la Presidenta, Amodei, most of Silicon Valley, etc. will all be exhausted from jacking off at the thought....just before the Giant Fucking Singularity Bot figures they too must go, they waste energy it needs.

Re: Worthless fucking statistic.

By Fons_de_spons • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Utility company did some maintenance on a big transformer cabinet in my street. (Belgium). We got a warning in the letterbox saying the power would be out from morning until noon.
I was pleasantly surprised when the power still worked. Those guys brought a truck with a giant generator on it to keep our power up. Sure it went out in the morning for 15 minutes, but that was it.
Don’t worry US. Even if you aren’t the greatest anymore, you still can be respected. Just tone down a bit and you will see. Cheers!

Re:Worthless fucking statistic.

By thegarbz • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Bullshit. Europe has blackouts. For example, the 2025 Iberian Peninsula Blackout which affected 55 MILLION people and killed 8 people. Kinda puts the numbers in the summary in perspective.

The funny part about your post is you don’t see the irony that every time someone mentions Europe blackouts they all point to the same example, precisely BECAUSE THEY ARE SO RARE.

Europe has plenty of blackouts, but they are all usually highly localised and small. The 2025 Iberian Peninsula Blackout was international news, and resulted in legislative changes, it was equally parts bad and unique. On the flip side you’re posting on an article talking about 6 outages in 6 months in the USA. That’s the real perspective, you’re comparing an insanely rare freak event to a very common occurrence in the USA.

Also for the record the USA still has the record as well. The 2003 Northwestern outage also cut power to 55 million people. The difference is Spain had their power back up in 12 hours whereas the USA had the power down for 4 days.

Kinda puts even the rare exceptions you insist on using in your post in perspective.

Book Publishers Sue Google For Copyright Infringement Over Gemini AI Training

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Major publishers Hachette, Cengage, Elsevier, and author Scott Turow have sued Google, accusing it of using millions of copyrighted books to train Gemini without permission or payment, in “one of the most prolific infringements of copyrighted materials in history.” The Guardian reports:
The publishers argue that Google repurposed books that had been supplied for limited services such as Google Books, Google Play Books and Google Scholar. Those services allowed Google to use the works in specific ways — for example, to display searchable snippets or sell ebooks — but not, the lawsuit claims, to copy them for training commercial AI products. “Desperate to maintain its online dominance, Google abandoned its early motto of ‘Don’t be evil’ and engaged in one of the most prolific infringements of copyrighted materials in history,” the suit states (PDF).

According to the complaint, the tech company made copies of copyrighted books to train Gemini without permission or payment, despite internal discussions acknowledging the legal risks. The filing claims Google flagged internally that it could face "$10Bs-$100Bs in potential fines” for using texts provided by publishers for Google Play Books. The publishers say Google’s actions are harming authors and the wider publishing industry, arguing that AI-generated content could negatively impact book sales.

It notes that, for example, Gemini could generate “a 100-page murder mystery set in a quiet seaside town filled with secrets, that substitutes for an original copyrighted murder mystery on which Gemini trained” in 20 minutes for 39 cents. “No publisher or author can compete with that.” The lawsuit names a number of specific books that the publishers allege were among the copyrighted works used without permission, including NK Jemisin’s The Fifth Season, and Lemony Snicket’s Who Could That Be at This Hour?

Good

By liqu1d • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
They like any of the other should pay for what they have taken. In an ideal world they’d be forced to remove it from their data until they have suitable permission but I don’t foresee that happening or if it’s even possible without retraining the entire model.

Re:Dictionaries Mysteriously Not Sued

By test321 • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Dictionary publishers do get sued. In 2001, the “New Oxford American Dictionary” added ghost (fake) word “esquivalience” to their boko and sued several online dictionaries that included the word (who only could have added through bulk copying the first dictionary).
In 1998, Larousse and Robert (two well-known dictionary publishers) sued Maxidico for plagiarism due due to striking similarities in definitions, including same mistakes/typos. Maxidico was sentenced to the equivalent of 1.5 million euros in damages (of the money of the time) and filed for bankrupcy.

Where’s the payout for coders?

By outsider007 • Score: 3, Interesting Thread

Seriously, why should book authors get more compensation for their work being trained on than the rest of us?

Typically americanâ¦

By RealMelancon • Score: 3 Thread
Typical American corporation, I can take whatever I want, if you’re not happy, sue me!

Judgment the world wants

By greytree • Score: 3 Thread
The judgment the world wants:

Google; You wre evil and will be broken up.

Copyright Cartel: 95-year copyright is an abomination. That goes down to a reasonable five years, and one year for journals.

Spotify Is Now an AI Chatbot, Too

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Spotify is testing a new "Talk to Spotify" AI feature for Premium subscribers that will let them chat with an AI assistant to explore music, podcasts, and audiobooks. The feature can answer questions about what users are listening to, adjust playback through follow-up prompts, and offer more personalized recommendations. The Verge reports:
Amazon Music introduced a similar feature last year when it integrated Alexa Plus into the service. Spotify’s chatbot goes a step beyond providing AI-powered recommendations and general trivia, however, because it references your playlists, favorite artists, repeat listens, and listening data when responding to requests. That means you can ask questions about your own listening history to check when you first heard a specific song, or see what genres you’ve been into lately if you can’t hold out for the annual Wrapped insights.

The updated AI capabilities are more conversational than older features like Prompted Playlist, which automatically builds playlists based on descriptions. Now, you can ask the Spotify chatbot to “play some songs I haven’t heard before,” and control what’s being played with further instructions like requesting specific artists or asking to make it “more upbeat.” Spotify says the new conversational experience aims to make the platform “more personal and useful for every listener,” making this one of several ways that the company is trying to address complaints about its algorithm.

You can also ask the Spotify AI general questions about whatever you’re listening to, making the feature feel similar to using chatbot services like Google’s Gemini or OpenAI’s ChatGPT. That includes asking for when a song was released, exploring other titles an author has written when listening to one of their audiobooks, or checking if a podcast guest has appeared on other audio shows.

Piss off

By liqu1d • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
Stop bloating the client and go back to being good at recommending new music. Perhaps some effort into the ad targeting too. If I’m currently listening to Pantera there’s a pretty reasonable chance I’m not interested in Jayden Smiths new album…

Needs to be agentic AI

By JoeyRox • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
I need Spotify to listen to music for me and summarize how much I enjoyed it.

I have some requests.

By Petersko • Score: 3, Interesting Thread

I spend a lot of time on my motorcycle. I would love it if Spotify had enough integration with the microphone to open up AI-driven conversational control.

“I like this track. Please add the artist to my follow list.”

“If this artist has additional tracks similar in energy and tempo please queue them for me.”

“Please ease up on the alt country. I know I listened to a bunch of Dead South but it’s getting a little much.”

“If you play this artist for me again without being asked, cancel my subscription. I’m serious.”

Hack Reveals Suno AI Music Generator Scraped YouTube, Deezer, and Genius

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
A hacker who breached Suno reportedly revealed source code and training-library details showing the AI music generator scraped millions of songs and lyrics from sources including YouTube Music, Deezer, Genius, Pond5, Jamendo, Freesound, and podcast RSS feeds. “The hacked data is a rare look at exactly how AI models and tools are built,” reports 404 Media. “Suno is one of the largest AI music generation tools on the internet, and has been the subject of several major lawsuits from the record industry, which accused the company of training on millions of copyrighted songs.” Suno maintains that its models were trained on publicly available music files and metadata as fair use. 404 Media reports:
The Recording Industry Association of America accused Suno of ripping songs directly from YouTube; the hacked data seen by 404 Media confirms this. The hacked material includes source code that appears to be from 2023 and 2024 that includes scraping instructions and details about the scope of at least some of the scraping. For example, the comments in one file note that they will pull from “genius_hq, youtube_music, freesound, jamendo, imp, deezer, ytm_tagged,” and that “non-music will be filtered out.” A file called “youtube_music” notes that at the time the file was last updated, it had ingested “2,013,545 music clips.” Another file contains comments about different datasets Suno had created, which included “113,879 hours of youtube_music,” “17,615 hours of genius_hq,” “410 hours of free sound,” “19,514 hours of imslp,” “3,726 hours of jamendo,” “62,117 hours of pond5_music,” “12,287 hours of deezer,” “152,162 hours of ytm_tagged,” and “103 hours of musescore_lyrics.” In total, this is at least decades worth of music.

Other code the hacker shared with 404 Media appeared to look specifically for vocals by searching specifically for acapella versions of songs on YouTube. The code also suggested that Suno was using proxies to scrape songs from YouTube through a company called Bright Data, which sells scraping tools, infrastructure, and data services. Additional code shows that with the help of an online tool called PodcastIndex, Suno identified 420,000 different podcasts that had at least five, 30-minute episodes and sought to download roughly 1 million hours of podcasts.

[…] The hacker, ellie.191, told 404 Media they breached the company by hacking an individual employee using the Shai-Hulud worm, a supply chain attack that allowed hackers to harvest GitHub and cloud service credentials. They said they also accessed Suno’s customer list, which included customers’ emails and/or phone numbers and Stripe payment details, depending on what they used to login. The hacker provided a sample of some of the customers, some of whom confirmed to 404 Media they had used their phone number to sign up for Suno and said they were never notified of a breach. The hacker told 404 Media they had no specific motivation for hacking Suno and said “I like to hack anything and everything.”

SUNO - “Stealing Until Nothing’s Original”

By haruchai • Score: 3 Thread

YouTube drummer El Estapario Siberiano came up with that and sells merch with that on it

Shocking!

By SlashbotAgent • Score: 4, Funny Thread

This is as shocking as putting your tongue on the terminals of a dead 9 volt battery.

FCC Plans To Repeal 39% TV Ownership Cap

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
The FCC plans to vote on repealing local TV ownership limits, including the 39% national audience cap that currently restricts how much of the U.S. market a single broadcast group can reach. Engadget reports:
On August 6, commissioners will hold a ballot to repeal Section 303 of the Communications Act, and with it the 39 percent rule. In essence, the rule limits the reach of a local TV network to no more than 39 percent of the U.S.’ total audience market. In its place, the FCC would move to a system whereby it would personally approve or reject TV ownership deals on a case-by-case basis.

It’s not clear if the FCC even has the authority to reject Section 303 without the explicit consent of the legislature. As Lawrence J. Spiwak wrote in the Yale Journal on Regulation back in January, Section 10 of the Communications Act expressly forbids the FCC from bending the rules around Section 303.
“Americans no longer trust the legacy national media to report the news fairly or accurately,” wrote FCC Chairman Brendan Carr in an op-ed published on Breitbart. “In fact, only eight percent of Americans have a great deal of trust in mass media. That figure is even lower among Republicans — sitting at a mere three percent.”

"… Many local broadcast TV stations are getting hollowed out as a result and turning into little more than mouthpieces for programming produced in New York and Hollywood,” he alleged. “That is not what Congress or the FCC intended.”

Re:Free Speech is Hard to Get Right

By sit1963nz • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Free speech may be in theory a great thing, but when the ultra rich control such speech their “freedom” is not yours.
It’s now in their best interest to lie and make sure that lie is repeated and told from multiple “sources” so it becomes the alternative truth.

For example “The USA has the hottest economy in the world” without saying how much borrowing is going on and how interest payments are now the US’s biggest expense. The maxing out of the US “Credit card” will be a burden generations of Americans will be left with.
Meantime the wealthy are hiding wealth in other countries, into gold, into bunkers elsewhere in the world…

The only good thing is that the world is increasing its decoupling from the USA so the its implosion will have less of an impact on them.
Who knows, maybe they will have the cash/gold to buy up the husks of profitable US companies and take them overseas…

Re:Free Speech is Hard to Get Right

By Knightman • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Without a doubt, restricting the target audience a local broadcaster can reach to 39% is a form of censorship, no matter the reasoning behind it.

So if someone can’t have a monopoly on local TV broadcasts they are being censored?

In the past the FCC had to balance censorship with censorship, and the cap did that by preventing a broadcaster who refused to air a show from affecting more than 39% of the national audience.

No, the FCC had to balance public interest vs corporate and political interests because it’s more beneficial to give the public more choice and different views.

If it is not addressed, local broadcasters will be regulated out of existence by forcing them to compete with one hand tied behind their back.

Where’s the competition if all the local broadcasters are owned by the same company?

Now that programs from major studios can reach 100% of the national audience via online streaming services

Oh, so every American has internet? Funny that, about ~25 million Americans lack access to reliable internet access.

If it is not addressed, local broadcasters will be regulated out of existence by forcing them to compete with one hand tied behind their back.

If addressed, there will not be any competition at all because most of the local broadcasters will be bought up by one company. Sinclair Broadcast Group tried this in 2018 by hiding their purchasing of Tribune Media through shell companies which resulted in them being sued and fined 48 million in 2020.

If FCC repeals the 39% national cap Sinclair will quickly dominate local broadcast and considering what has happened to every other local broadcaster they bought, those broadcasters will be gutted and start to air mostly news-slop that is produced centrally.

I guess it has escaped your notice that a consolidation of media is happening which means that a handful of billionaires are becoming the sole owners of a majority of all media which in turn means they get to decide what everyone can see, not you or the public. Anyone with a smidgen of critical thinking knows that is bad, like dystopian bad.

Re:People want biased news.

By taustin • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

News is a business. And it’s not the business of selling news. It’s the business of selling advertising. And selling advertising is all about demographics and nothing else.

You want eyeballs to sell to advertisers? You have to attract viewers that match the demographics your advertisers want to advertise to. That means your “news” programs must be echo chambers, telling people what they want to hear, and the most proven method to attract viewers is to peddle FUD via outrage monkeys.

There is no “left wing media” or “right wing media,” there’s only “Madison Avenue media” who have divided up the demographics they advertise to between them. They people who run the news programs really don’t care about politics, because the moment they do, they go bankrupt. It’s a dying business, and there’s no margin left for personal agendas.

Re:Free Speech is Hard to Get Right

By Woeful Countenance • Score: 5, Informative Thread

According to their Web site, “Who is Nexstar? Nexstar and its subsidiaries and partners own or operate 265 stations in 132 markets in 44 states, reaching more than 70% of U.S. television households.”

“Sinclair, Inc. (Nasdaq: SBGI) is a diversified media company and a leading provider of local news and sports. The Company owns, operates and/or provides services to 177 television stations in 79 markets affiliated with all major broadcast networks .... Our media properties (including the investment in regional sports networks) have a local focus with national reach, with local and regional platforms reaching approximately 70% of the U.S. population and digital assets collectively reaching an average of 80 million unique visitors each month.”

Evidently they don’t feel 70% is enough and want more.

Mr Carr sure does repeat the rage-bait keywords “Hollywood” and “New York” a lot

Sinclair Broadcast Group (now Sinclair, Inc.) is headquartered in the Baltimore suburb of Hunt Valley, Maryland.

Nexstar Media Group is headquartered in Irving, Texas, with additional major operational offices in New York City and Chicago.

I’m not great at geography, but I don’t think Irving, Texas, or Baltimore is close to New York or Hollywood. Maybe Sinclair produces a lot of content in New York, who knows?

Re:Legal authority no longer is controlling

By Richard_at_work • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Wasnt there a SCOTUS ruling recently that ruled that agencies cannot enact their own rules, but can only enforce rules as laid out in law? And if Congress wanted the agency to enforce a rule, it should pass a law to that effect?

We all know that that was targeted at agencies like the EPA, FDA etc, to get rid of the agency-created limits on things, but it feels like it should equally apply here - the law says X, the agency cant change the law.

Google and Epic Cancel Settlement; Third-Party App Stores Coming To Google Play

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica:
Big changes are coming to Android apps, but they’re not the changes Google wanted. The settlement between Google and Epic that aimed to put to rest the companies’ long-running antitrust battle is being withdrawn, and that means third-party app stores are coming to the Play Store. Google has confirmed that it will begin distributing rival app stores next week, setting the stage for competing platforms to take a bite out of Google’s Android revenue stream. […] Google and Epic were set to return to court on July 16 to argue in favor of the settlement. However, the writing may have been on the wall. In a recent expert analysis provided to the court, MIT economics professor Nancy Rose noted that the settlement was “unlikely to enable Google Play’s potential competitors to overcome their long-standing network-effect disadvantage in a timely manner.”

With settlement approval looking increasingly unlikely, Epic and Google agreed this week to call the whole thing off. Here’s how Google Trust and Reputation Communications Lead Dan Jackson explains the company’s decision: “We’ve agreed with Epic to withdraw our motion to modify the US Court’s injunction rather than prolonging this process which creates uncertainty for the ecosystem. This allows us to focus on executing our recently announced global business model evolution to deliver greater app store choice, lower prices, and more opportunities for developers and users. We remain committed to maintaining Android’s industry-leading security and fostering a competitive ecosystem where every app store and developer has the freedom to compete. In parallel, we continue to comply with the US Court’s injunction.”

In a brief filing (PDF), Google’s legal team informs the court that Google is prepared to begin distributing third-party app stores in Google Play on July 22. Under the terms of Judge Donato’s original injunction, these stores will have access to the full catalog of Google Play apps by default. Developers will have the option to opt out of distribution in these stores, and Google has a support page explaining how to do so. Google also has documentation on how app stores can get access to the Google Play catalog. It won’t be mirroring those apps in any shady storefront that asks. The court has allowed Google to charge reasonable fees to cover its security and compliance review of third-party stores, which will be $5,000 per year.

Google will also require approved stores to block malware, respect intellectual property, and include mechanisms to update and uninstall apps. App stores can be removed from the program if more than 1 percent of attempted app installs appear to be malware or unwanted software. It’s unclear if there will be separate, possibly more stringent requirements for storefront distribution in the Play Store. However, Google is prohibited from unreasonably blocking third-party store clients uploaded to Google Play. The changes Google has announced under the Epic agreement will proceed for now. That means Registered App Stores will happen globally, but they will probably only appear in the Play Store for US users. Google hasn’t specified if there will be any differences in the features available to the stores downloaded from Play versus registered stores.

F-Droid

By TwistedGreen • Score: 3 Thread

Does this mean I will be able to download F-Droid from Google Play?

Re:F-Droid

By caseih • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Nope. Google is still set to kill F-Droid later this year when they turn on mandatory developer certificates which will require developers to pay Google and hand over their personal information, regardless of what app store they want to distribute through. This will essentially kill F-Droid for casual users (their main target is almost certainly NewPipe). Yes you can still use F-Droid but you’ll have to do a 24 hour delay before you can install F-Droid.

Re:F-Droid

By swillden • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Nope. Google is still set to kill F-Droid later this year when they turn on mandatory developer certificates which will require developers to pay Google and hand over their personal information, regardless of what app store they want to distribute through.

Nonsense. There’s no reason to expect that mandatory developer certificates will kill F-Droid, at all. F-Droid will need one guy to pay the $25 fee and identify himself. Unless they can use the open source developer exception that Google has talked about (but hasn’t announced any details, AFAIK).

This will essentially kill F-Droid for casual users (their main target is almost certainly NewPipe). Yes you can still use F-Droid but you’ll have to do a 24 hour delay before you can install F-Droid.

That’s a bigger issue, because Google’s announced policy is to require that apps respect intellectual property, which would include not distributing apps that blatantly violate terms of service. Most likely F-Droid will have to stop distributing NewPipe if they want to be in Google Play. If dropping NewPipe is enough to kill F-Droid, then I guess that’ll do it.

Re:F-Droid [and broader solutions]

By shanen • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Okay, I’ll say it sounds like a reasonable question for a plausible FP, but do you [TwistedGreen or caseih or another reader] care to say enough to make anyone care? Even care enough to “encourage” a websearch?

My problem with websearch these weeks is the AIs lie and hallucinate too much. On the second hand they are so polite about it that the “conversations” are often more pleasant than what you see on today’s Slashdot, but still. Mostly I don’t want to talk to it. It’s almost enough to drive a human to Bing. “Which AI do you trust today?”

But I still have a radical suggestion for a broader solution approach: Tell the truth. In reference to today’s WWW it sounds like I must be going for funny, but I’m quite serious. The specific truth I’m asking for involves the truth about the money. Can you imagine a “Business Model” tab in Google’s and Apple’s presentation of the app they are “helping” you install for their greater glory and market dominance?

Given the usual discussions I notice on Slashdot these years, it’s really hard to think the average reader has that much imagination, so I’ll practice my typing a bit more. (But the AIs type also better than I do, among their other wonderful attributes.)

The basic idea is to let the app’s creator explain where the money is coming from so we can assess the legitimacy and motivations and even the probable durability of the app. I think most of the time that would just involve picking from the list of popular business models, but there should be an “Other” option where an actual innovator can explain something else. Up to you to decide if you want to trust the salesman whose pitch includes “It’s a new business model and I don’t want to tell you the details.” I actually think there are too many suckers who would swallow that bait anyway, but…

The lower part of the “Business Model” tab would be under the control of Google (or Apple or Samsung or your phone company or Microsoft or Meta or worse). (Worse than Meta? Whoa!) In many cases, the cases where the google is participating in the business via ads or some other aspect, the google would be able to add a simple affirmation of the sort “We are on the other side of that business model and it is working as described.” I’m not saying the complicated cases would go away, but the google could decide exactly how much “due diligence” seems called for. Or ask their AI to assess the risk? Does the google even trust their own dog food these years?

But there is a deeper root of the problem. It’s the “Live and let scam” business model. In email the specific flavor of poison is “Live and let spam”, and I think most of the blame still goes back to Microsoft for the EULA innovation. Consider the case of Microsoft’s liability if you commit a crime using Microsoft’s “perfect” software. That’s right, you (and the victims) have no case. (I used to credit Microsoft with two significant innovations leading to PROFIT!, but after reading Microsoft Secrets by Cusumano and Selby, I changed my mind about one of them. Not the actual innovation I thought it was?)

Hopefully Google won’t hamstring this

By Todd Knarr • Score: 3 Thread

Hopefully Google won’t hamstring this by forcing you to enable “install apps from any source” setting to use non-Google app stores. If I use an alternate app store I don’t want to let apps from just anywhere be installed, I only want apps from that app store to be installed. Apps from anywhere else I want to continue to block.

FreeBSD 16 Retires the Last of Its GPL Code

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
FreeBSD 16 has removed the last GPL-licensed code from its base system, retiring the old GNU ‘dialog’ implementation after the installer moved to ‘bsddialog’ and the final dependency was disabled. Phoronix reports:
This ticket to retire dialog was opened back in February while is now merged to the FreeBSD source tree for what will become FreeBSD 16.0. With dialog removed, the latest FreeBSD code now retires the GNU sub-tree of the FreeBSD base system now that no more GNU code remains. FreeBSD 16.0 is working its way toward release that is expected to happen in December 2027.

I think I started this

By howardjp • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

27 years ago, I wrote a clean implementation of grep, specifically for this purpose. It has since been adopted by (at least) FreeBSD, OpenBSD, NetBSD, Haiku, Minix, MacOS, iOS, and who knows what else. So this is really cool to see this.

Re:I think I started this

By howardjp • Score: 5, Informative Thread

I wrote that line. But use the source. https://github.com/freebsd/fre…

Re:GPL is software herpes

By fahrbot-bot • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Oh, that explains why BSD which predates Linux is an also-ran, while Linux is the world’s most popular operating system and many major contributors told us in so many words that they chose to contribute to Linux instead of BSD specifically because of the license.

Some of it is the licensing, with the BSD license having fewer restrictions on reuse, but a lot of it was the early fighting over Unix copyrights, including between AT&T and BSD, when Unix proved to be a viable commercial OS, like with 386BSD (which I used - yes, I’m old :-) ), rather than just a research and university item. While companies were fighting over who would control and profit from Unix, Linux got a head start actually being used. Both have their pros and cons and places where one may be a better choice than the other.

Re:Context?

By abulafia • Score: 5, Informative Thread
There’s a handy list, probably a little out of date.

Names you might recognize of include Juniper, Citrix and Netapp.

Re:Context?

By ClickOnThis • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The GPL is (intentionally) coercive, forcing those that use it to do something one might otherwise not do

Nonsense. Nobody is “forced” to incorporate GPL code into their project.

(although in practice, many of the large FreeBSD using organizations do end up contributing back

They’re not obliged to do so, and many don’t. With GPL, they must. That keeps the software free for others to do the same.

Your freedom is not always my freedom.

Whatever “freedom” means for a piece of software is determined by its author, not the user.

I am sure all your code, and all your employers code, is open source and GPL (or equivalent), and if not, you, yourself, do not actually believe in the freedom you are claiming is better.

You should be careful about making such a claim. I can believe in the freedom of the GPL and still respect the wishes of my employer. And I have worked for companies that have used software under a variety of licenses, including GPL.

OpenAI Launches a Keypad for AI Agents

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot
OpenAI’s first hardware device is a limited-edition desktop keypad called the Codex Micro that lets users monitor and control AI coding agents. Axios reports:
Codex Micro is a collaboration with Work Louder, a boutique hardware company known for customizable mechanical keyboards and shortcut controllers for developers and designers. The small, square macro pad — with backlit keys, a rotary knob and a tiny joystick — sits beside your regular keyboard as a physical shortcut box for common Codex actions and shows the status of your agents. The keys are customizable and include a push-to-talk option as well as a dial to adjust your reasoning setting. Codex Micro is a niche device for Codex power users and will only be available until it sells out. It’s priced at $230.

Is the Peak Here Yet?

By crunchy_one • Score: 4 Thread
$230 for $20 worth of electronics? All this device demonstrates is the utter contempt in which OpenAI holds its “customers”.

You know it’s a bubble when silly devices show up

By ArghBlarg • Score: 4 Thread

I’m old enough to remember this.

Though it looks kinda funky, will keep an eye out for one on the surplus junk market after the bubble pops, could be a fun control surface for other things.

WTF?

By CEC-P • Score: 4, Informative Thread
I already have one of these. It’s called my keyboard. And I know where all the keys are to control anything in any UI without even looking down. And it was $18 not $230.