Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. British Columbia Bans Level 3 and Above Autonomous Cars
  2. openSUSE Factory Achieves Bit-By-Bit Reproducible Builds
  3. NASA Veteran Behind Propellantless Propulsion Drive Announces Major Discovery
  4. Two Major ISPs Threaten They’ll Stop Complying With US FISA Orders
  5. Netflix Doc Accused of Using AI To Manipulate True Crime Story
  6. Android Gets a New Software-Based AV1 Decoder
  7. Firefox Nightly Expands To Linux On ARM64
  8. Dutch Privacy Watchdog Recommends Government Organizations Stop Using Facebook
  9. 23andMe CEO Anne Wojcicki Considers Taking Company Private
  10. ‘Women Who Code’ Shuts Down Unexpectedly
  11. A Chess Formula Is Taking Over the World
  12. EPA Will Make Polluters Pay To Clean Up Two ‘Forever Chemicals’
  13. Linus Torvalds on ‘Hilarious’ AI Hype
  14. Microsoft’s VASA-1 Can Deepfake a Person With One Photo and One Audio Track
  15. Indian IT Outsourcing Firms Cut 60,000 Jobs in First Layoffs in 20 Years

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

British Columbia Bans Level 3 and Above Autonomous Cars

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
New submitter Baloo Uriza writes:
In a rare display of sanity in the automotive space, British Columbia has banned autonomous cars from its highways after years of watching autonomous cars hamper emergency response efforts in California and outright kill a pedestrian in Arizona. Let’s hope this regulatory trend continues and moves into the human space by pulling licenses of drivers with a known history of poor driving.
In the shared article, The Drive notes that the ban only applies to self-driving vehicles that exceed a Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) autonomy rating of Level 2. [A full breakdown of each of the levels can be found here.] The ban is part of an update to B.C.‘s Motor Vehicle Act that went into effect on April 5, 2024 and includes possible consequences of a max penalty of $2,000 (CAD) in fines and up to six months of prison time. Importantly, the ban could change as autonomous driving tech evolves in the coming years.

Since the ban doesn’t affect Level 2 vehicles, Tesla owners who use Autopilot and FSD, as well as Ford and GM vehicle owners with BlueCruise and Super Cruise, will be exempt. In fact, there are currently no Level 3 autonomous vehicles for sale in Canada.

openSUSE Factory Achieves Bit-By-Bit Reproducible Builds

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Michael Larabel reports via Phoronix:
While Fedora 41 in late 2024 is aiming to have more reproducible package builds, openSUSE Factory has already achieved a significant milestone in bit-by-bit reproducible builds. Since last month openSUSE Factory has been producing bit-by-bit reproducible builds sans the likes of embedded signatures. OpenSUSE Tumbleweed packages for that rolling-release distribution are being verified for bit-by-bit reproducible builds. SUSE/openSUSE is still verifying all packages are yielding reproducible builds but so far it’s looking like 95% or more of packages are working out.
You can learn more via the openSUSE blog.

NASA Veteran Behind Propellantless Propulsion Drive Announces Major Discovery

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Longtime Slashdot reader garyisabusyguy shares a report from The Debrief:
Dr. Charles Buhler, a NASA engineer and the co-founder of Exodus Propulsion Technologies, has revealed that his company’s propellantless propulsion drive, which appears to defy the known laws of physics, has produced enough thrust to counteract Earth’s gravity. “The most important message to convey to the public is that a major discovery occurred,” Buhler told The Debrief. “This discovery of a New Force is fundamental in that electric fields alone can generate a sustainable force onto an object and allow center-of-mass translation of said object without expelling mass.” “There are rules that include conservation of energy, but if done correctly, one can generate forces unlike anything humankind has done before,” Buhler added. “It will be this force that we will use to propel objects for the next 1,000 years until the next thing comes.”

To document his team’s discovery as well as the process behind their work, which Dr. Buhler cautions is in no way affiliated with NASA or the U.S. Government, the outwardly amiable researcher presented his findings at a recent Alternative Propulsion Energy Conference (APEC). Filled with both highly-credentialed career engineers and propulsion hobbyists, APEC is an organization The Debrief once referred to as the World’s Most Exclusive (And Strange) Anti-Gravity Club. In conjunction with that presentation, “The Discovery of Propellantless Propulsion: The Direct Conversion of Electrical Energy into Physical Thrust,” Dr. Buhler also sat down with APEC co-founder and moderator Tim Ventura to explain how his past in electrostatics, which is his primary area of expertise, ended up being a key component of his discovery of this new force. […]

Up next, Buhler says his team is seeking funding to test their devices in space to better understand the force at work. “We’re hoping to do some demos,” said Buhler. “Some space demos. That’s what we’re trying to get some funding to do. I think that would be a great way to show off the technology.” Besides proving once and for all that the force they are seeing is real, the accomplished engineer believes that such tests could encourage other scientists to search for an explanation of what exactly it is they are seeing. “I think it’s a good opportunity for people to run these tests, look at them, watch them go in space, watch it move in space, and then say, “what does it imply? What are the implications?’" Until that time, Buhler says he believes his work proves that the force they are seeing is “fundamental” and that understanding it is the next logical step. “You can’t deny this,” he told Ventura. “There’s not a lot to this. You’re just charging up Teflon, copper tape, and foam, and you have this thrust.”

So, while his team believes their experiments speak for themselves, the veteran scientist says he also believes it is the job of science to analyze and understand this discovery. If successful, he thinks it may even address some of the harder questions in science, including the nature of dark energy or even space/time itself. “It’s easy to make these things,” he said, “so it’s a tool for the scientific community to use to try to explore those hard questions.”
If there are companies or individuals interested in working with Exodus Propulsion Technologies, Buhler asks that they reach out via their LinkedIn page.

If it can counter act Earth gravity

By simlox • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
he could easily demonstrate and experiment with it on the ground. So why ask for investment to go to Space? The cold fusion guys at least published stuff and let the community debunk it instead of asking for investments. I don’t say the 4 letter s-word.

Prove It

By divide overflow • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
If this is supposedly real science, demonstrate that it works.
Show us the evidence.

Re: If it can counter act Earth gravity

By serviscope_minor • Score: 4, Informative Thread

I think propellentless and taking no energy are very different things.

I disagree, because the claim isn’t that propellentless requires no energy it’s that if you are given a propellentless drive, you can construct a machine which outputs more energy than is required to run it. This means a propellentless drive is equivalent to a perpetual motion machine, so since the latter cannot exist, the former cannot as well.

Here’s the thing. Assume you have a drive that produces 1N per Watt of power with no propellant. Basically, 1W goes in, 1N of force comes out by unexplained physics.

Let’s assume for sake of argument that the drive and battery weigh 1kG, so the entire assembly when turned on will accelerate at 1m/s/s

After 1 seconds, the kinetic energy will be .5 m v^2, i.e. .5J, but you’ll have expended 1J to power it. So far so good.

After 10 seconds, the kinetic energy will be .5 m v^2, i.e. 50J, but you’ll have expended only 10J to power it. that’s odd.

After 100 seconds, then k.e. will be 5000J, after expending only 100J to power it. That’s bad.

Note how energy is “consumed”, but it still gains more k.e. than is spent powering it. That’s free energy right there. If you can close the loop and bleed off some of the free energy to power it, e.g. by attaching it to a wheel and getting it to spin a generator, then it will spew out energy from nothing.

I’d like to note that those numbers are high for sake of illustration, but it doesn’t change the underlying physics. The numbers reported are always much lower, conveniently below the threshold of easy measurement, but you can always get free energy by cranking V high enough, because the v squared term in mv^2 always wins in the end (it gets much more complicated to do the maths when relativity becomes significant, but the results are not fundamentally different).

Re: If it can counter act Earth gravity

By serviscope_minor • Score: 4, Informative Thread

I love how your sig says “unite behind the science” and then say… well, all of that!

The first law of thermodynamics is the law of conservation of energy. That has literally everything to do with all of physics everywhere. It is baked into every physical law we have described at the deepest level. They are all time invariant so energy must be conserved.

I’m curious as to how you think you can just pick and choose which bits of physics apply, and why you think loud, angry responses make that so. But do go on.

Re:If it can counter act Earth gravity

By serviscope_minor • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Oh, Newton made law that says propellant free drives do not exist?

It’s an obvious corollary of the maths, yes.

How does a Mag Lev Train work then?

It pushes off the maglev track, which is bolted to the Earth, so the Earth is it’s reaction mass (i.e. propellent).

How does an MHD submarine drive work?

same as a regular one, but it uses MHD to exert a force on the water, not a propeller. The water is the reaction mass, i.e. propellent.

How the fuck does a railgun work?

The rail (and whatever the rail is bolted to) is the reaction mass.

Newton never made/found/imagined a law of physics that forbids propellant free engines.

Apart from the third law. You know the equal and opposite reaction one. Without reaction mass (i.e. propellent) there is no reaction.

Two Major ISPs Threaten They’ll Stop Complying With US FISA Orders

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader shared this report from the Washington Post:
U.S. government officials were scrambling Friday night to prevent what they fear could be a significant loss of access to critical national security information, after two major U.S. communications providers said they would stop complying with orders under a controversial surveillance law that is set to expire at midnight, according to five people familiar with the matter.

One communications provider informed the National Security Agency that it would stop complying on Monday with orders under Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, which enables U.S. intelligence agencies to gather without a warrant the digital communications of foreigners overseas — including when they text or email people inside the United States. Another provider suggested that it would cease complying at midnight Friday unless the law is reauthorized, according to the people familiar with the matter, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive negotiations.

The companies’ decisions, which were conveyed privately and have not previously been reported, have alarmed national security officials, who strongly disagree with their position and argue that the law requires the providers to continue complying with the government’s surveillance orders even after the statute expires. That’s because a federal court this month granted the government a one-year extension to continue intelligence collection.

FISA, PATRIOT Act, Five-Eyes, etc

By systemd-anonymousd • Score: 3 Thread

Everything the federal government has done viz a viz spying since 9/11 has been a travesty and an ass-wipe on the constitution.

And?

By registrations_suck • Score: 3 Thread

If the law expires, there is nothing to comply with.

The congresscritters renewed it

By Anonymous Coward • Score: 3, Interesting Thread
Ref: Congress extends controversial warrantless surveillance law for two years

Laboring into the early hours of Saturday morning, Congress reauthorized for two years a surveillance program that U.S. spy agencies regard as one of their most valuable tools and that critics on the left and the right say intrudes on Americans’ privacy.

The 60-34 vote in the Senate came a week after the House renewed Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, which enables U.S. intelligence agencies to gather without a warrant the digital communications of foreigners overseas â" including when they text or email people inside the United States. The measure now goes to President Biden’s desk for a signature.

The ISP’s only hope would be to challenge the timing of the renewal in court: it was required to be renewed by midnight Friday night so, technically, the law expired and lapsed before it was due to be renewed.

Netflix Doc Accused of Using AI To Manipulate True Crime Story

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Earlier this week, Netflix found itself embroiled in an AI scandal when Futurism spotted AI-generated images used in the Netflix documentary What Jennifer Did.. The movie’s credits do not mention any uses of AI, causing critics to call out the filmmakers for “potentially embellishing a movie that’s supposed to be based on real-life events,” reports Ars Technica. An executive producer of the Netflix hit acknowledged that some of the photos were edited to protect the identity of the source but remained vague about whether AI was used in the process. From the report:
What Jennifer Did shot to the top spot in Netflix’s global top 10 when it debuted in early April, attracting swarms of true crime fans who wanted to know more about why Pan paid hitmen $10,000 to murder her parents. But quickly the documentary became a source of controversy, as fans started noticing glaring flaws in images used in the movie, from weirdly mismatched earrings to her nose appearing to lack nostrils, the Daily Mail reported, in a post showing a plethora of examples of images from the film. […]

Jeremy Grimaldi — who is also the crime reporter who wrote a book on the case and provided the documentary with research and police footage — told the Toronto Star that the images were not AI-generated. Grimaldi confirmed that all images of Pan used in the movie were real photos. He said that some of the images were edited, though, not to blur the lines between truth and fiction, but to protect the identity of the source of the images. “Any filmmaker will use different tools, like Photoshop, in films,” Grimaldi told The Star. “The photos of Jennifer are real photos of her. The foreground is exactly her. The background has been anonymized to protect the source.” While Grimaldi’s comments provide some assurance that the photos are edited versions of real photos of Pan, they are also vague enough to obscure whether AI was among the “different tools” used to edit the photos.

Re:How would AI edit photos?

By GrumpySteen • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Probably because the hands and fingers are fucked up in the exact same way that AI always fucks up hands and fingers.

A human told to edit an image to “protect the anonymity of the source” wouldn’t start off thinking “I know… I’ll remove one finger from the right hand and three from the left, then fuck up the palms to make it look like the fingers became blobby tumors.”

Android Gets a New Software-Based AV1 Decoder

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Ben Schoon reports via 9to5Google:
Google’s Arif Dikici confirmed on LinkedIn this week that Android is now using VideoLAN’s (the makers of VLC) “dav1d” software decoder to allow AV1 to work on more devices. This is now available on all devices running Android 12 or higher via a software update. Mishaal Rahman points out that this started to roll out with the March 2024 Google Play system update.

Dikici says that “most” devices can at least support 720p at 30 frames per second, but that apps will need to opt in “for now” to support AV1 via software decoding. One app that has opted in is YouTube, which now uses AV1 on all compatible devices (though it may have reverted this). This may result in increased power usage depending on your device, though. Improvements on that front may be coming, though, says VideoLAN on Twitter/X.

Firefox Nightly Expands To Linux On ARM64

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
BrianFagioli shares a report from BetaNews:
Mozilla has announced Firefox Nightly for ARM64. This release will cater to the growing demand for support on ARM64 platforms, commonly referred to as AArch64. Feedback from the community has led Mozilla to expand the availability of Firefox Nightly. Users can now access the browser as both .tar archives and .deb packages, depending on their preference and requirements for installation.

For those who favor traditional methods, the .tar.bz2 binaries are accessible through Mozilla’s downloads page by selecting the option for Firefox Nightly for Linux ARM64/AArch64. Meanwhile, users looking to utilize updates and installation through Mozilla’s APT repository can follow specific instructions to install the firefox-nightly package.

Dutch Privacy Watchdog Recommends Government Organizations Stop Using Facebook

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Reuters:
The Dutch privacy watchdog AP on Friday said it was recommending that government organizations should stop using Facebook as long as it is unclear what happens with personal data of users of the government’s Facebook pages. “People that visit a government’s page need to be able to trust that their personal and sensitive data is in safe hands,” AP chairman Aleid Wolfsen said in a statement. Junior minister for digitalization Alexandra van Huffelen said Facebook parent company Meta had to make clear before the summer how it could take away the government’s concerns on the safety of data. “Otherwise we will be forced to stop using Facebook, in line with this advice,” she said.

official syndication

By at10u8 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
I have always been dismayed that government agencies found it convenient to use the likes of Twitter and Facebook as a means of publishing official information, but the question remains unanswered about how governments can syndicate information to places where people will be able and likely to find it.

I don’t understand…

By VeryFluffyBunny • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
…why any govt would use 3rd party websites that are famous for misinformation, scams, criminal activities, etc.. It’s not as if govt agencies don’t have their own websites where they can post the information anyway, right?

Re:I don’t understand…

By stabiesoft • Score: 4, Informative Thread
Exactly this. What I would like to see is a very uniform use of .gov. I’ve seen some government sites use things like twc.tx.us instead. They never should have started using fb/tw. It should have always been .gov, period. Then you could count on it not being a scam. I just looked up who controls .gov and well, its the US gov. And it looks like they ask for way more info than controllers like godaddy, and it is even free for most.

23andMe CEO Anne Wojcicki Considers Taking Company Private

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Ashley Capoot reports via CNBC:
Anne Wojcicki, the CEO of 23andMe, is considering a proposal to take the genetic testing company private after its stock price tumbled more than 95% from its 2021 highs. A late Wednesday filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission said Wojcicki is working with advisors and plans to speak with possible financing sources and partners. She “wishes to maintain control” of the company and will “not be willing to support any alternative transaction,” the filing said. […] In November, 23andMe received a deficiency letter from the Nasdaq Listing Qualifications Department, which said the company had 180 days to bring its share price back above $1. The company’s board of directors formed a “Special Committee” in late March to help explore options that could juice the stock.

A press release on Thursday said the committee was made aware of Wojcicki’s interest in acquiring all of 23andMe’s outstanding shares. Wojcicki owns shares that make up more than 20% of those outstanding, which equates to about 49% of voting power, the release said. “The Special Committee will carefully review Ms. Wojcicki’s proposal when and if it is made available and evaluate it in light of other available strategic alternatives, including continuing to operate as a publicly traded company,” the committee said in the release. “The Special Committee is committed to acting in the best interests of 23andMe and its shareholders.” The committee has engaged Wells Fargo as its financial advisor, and it said there is “no assurance” that Wojcicki’s offer would result in the proposed outcome.

delisting

By bugs2squash • Score: 5, Informative Thread
I’m guessing they’ll do a better job keeping the company private than keeping their customers’ sensitive information private

Re:Value

By Tony Isaac • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

The trend is increasing demand for DNA tests, not decreasing. https://knowyourdna.com/dna-te…

I’m a happy customer of 23andMe, Ancestry DNA, and Family Tree DNA. I have contributed my DNA raw data to GedMatch and marked it *available* to law enforcement for investigative purposes. I continue to learn more from these DNA tests. The science is interesting, and I enjoy occasionally making contact with distant relatives I didn’t know I had.

No, not everybody is horrified.

Re:Value

By Tony Isaac • Score: 4, Informative Thread

If you avoid getting a DNA test because you’re worried about the government using it to track you down, it’s already too late. All they need is for one of your relatives to have gotten a test, somebody as distant as 2nd or 3rd cousin is close enough. Do you even know all your 3rd cousins? Probably not. This LA Times story has the details of how the “Golden State Killer” was identified through DNA, though he had personally never been tested. https://www.latimes.com/califo…

The business model is sound

By Tony Isaac • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

The company still has strong sales, and the industry is expanding. https://knowyourdna.com/dna-te…

The drop in share price is more about fear, than business principles.. It’s certainly a better bet than DJT.

Time to start selling all those genetic profiles,

By reanjr • Score: 3 Thread

So she’s gonna bring in private equity and sell all the genetic profiles, right?

‘Women Who Code’ Shuts Down Unexpectedly

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Women Who Code (WWC), a U.S.-based organization of 360,000 people supporting women who work in the tech sector, is shutting down due to a lack of funding. “It is with profound sadness that, today, on April 18, 2024, we are announcing the difficult decision to close Women Who Code, following a vote by the Board of Directors to dissolve the organization,” the organization said in a blog post. “This decision has not been made lightly. It only comes after careful consideration of all options and is due to factors that have materially impacted our funding sources — funds that were critical to continuing our programming and delivering on our mission. We understand that this news will come as a disappointment to many, and we want to express our deepest gratitude to each and every one of you who have been a part of our journey.” The BBC reports:
WWC was started 2011 by engineers who “were seeking connection and support for navigating the tech industry” in San Francisco. It became a nonprofit organization in 2013 and expanded globally. In a post announcing its closure, it said it had held more than 20,000 events and given out $3.5m in scholarships. A month before the closure, WWC had announced a conference for May, which has now been cancelled.

A spokesperson for WWC said: “We kept our programming moving forward while exploring all options.” They would not comment on questions about the charity’s funding. The most recent annual report, for 2022, showed the charity made almost $4m that year, while its expenses were just under $4.2m. WWC said that “while so much has been accomplished,” their mission was not complete. It continued: “Our vision of a tech industry where diverse women and historically excluded people thrive at every level is not fulfilled.”

Well, stands to reason

By cascadingstylesheet • Score: 5, Funny Thread
Biologists don’t come cheap!

They did help as a networking resource

By SuperKendall • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

How exactly has a non-profit helped women get jobs in tech fields?

Just recently I ran into a woman having trouble finding coding work despite a solid background and resume, some people had suggested to her she try Women Who Code to get some connections that could help her find some job opportunities.

I had contributed to them in the past as they also held women only coding camps for teenagers, that is I think the key way you actually get more women into coding as opposed to simply juggling the few professional woman coders in a sightly different mix across existing companies.

I had kind of lost track of them though and hadn’t contributed for a few years, I think the coding camps were shut down… maybe the organization just lost track of the core mission.

Re:The point of this was to get women into coding

By ffkom • Score: 5, Informative Thread
The vast majority of free open source projects were authored/maintained by one person, often for very long times. Thus one could only be a “toxic trash-fire” to oneself. Also, most free open source projects were started by young people who were neither mother nor father. The low ratio of women among the authors clearly cannot be explained by victim stories.

Re:A little too late for an audit

By ffkom • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
They probably would have asked, had the goal of their contribution been the efficient operation of a charity, rather than virtue signaling.

Re:Think Different

By tlhIngan • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

And the problem is that women often don’t know they can enter these fields.

There are tons of women who want to enter trades. However, all they see are men everywhere - and thus society has set up a stigma that “girls can’t code” or “girls can’t be electricians”.

The assumption is “girls aren’t interested” is about as true as saying “boys don’t cry”. It’s a sexism thing - girls play with Barbie, boys play with GI Joe. Heaven forbid you have a boy who’s interested in Barbie, or a girl who wants Transformers.

In fact, many trades have “girls do trades” type events where the whole purpose is to show that yes, if you want to sling a hammer, or do electrical work, or plumbing, or whatever, you can. Often there’s no role model to say “yes, you can!” in a family context, so plenty of people make the assumption that no, you might like to work on the computer and have a great time at it, but only boys code, so go and be a nurse instead”.

I’m sure there’s probably a huge dichotomy of people who are in unhappy careers because it “fit the stereotype” rather than actually exploring options in what they are more interested in. I know people who did computer science in university because they didn’t know what to do, so their parents said to do computer science as it was popular. I’m sure you all know how that usually turns out

And the reason I think it’s cultural? Other cultures have often no such qualms. I’ve seen lots of women from Indian, Chinese, or Eastern European backgrounds. They were encouraged to do the sciences and they pursued them Also, take a look at advertising for video games prior to the videogame crash - you’ll find it’s often done as a family activity with both a son and a daughter enjoying what little game there is. But afterwards, it’s purely something the boys do. And it has something to do with Nintendo - because in order to sell the NES, Nintendo couldn’t market it as a “video game” as that was poison. So they marketed it as a toy (aided by Robby). But if you do that, you need to pick - does it go in the boys section or the girls - heaven forbid a toy might actually be interesting to both sexes.

A Chess Formula Is Taking Over the World

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Atlantic:
In October 2003, Mark Zuckerberg created his first viral site: not Facebook, but FaceMash. Then a college freshman, he hacked into Harvard’s online dorm directories, gathered a massive collection of students’ headshots, and used them to create a website on which Harvard students could rate classmates by their attractiveness, literally and figuratively head-to-head. The site, a mean-spirited prank recounted in the opening scene of The Social Network, got so much traction so quickly that Harvard shut down his internet access within hours. The math that powered FaceMash — and, by extension, set Zuckerberg on the path to building the world’s dominant social-media empire — was reportedly, of all things, a formula for ranking chess players: the Elo system.

Fundamentally, what an Elo rating does is predict the outcome of chess matches by assigning every player a number that fluctuates based purely on performance. If you beat a slightly higher-ranked player, your rating goes up a little, but if you beat a much higher-ranked player, your rating goes up a lot (and theirs, conversely, goes down a lot). The higher the rating, the more matches you should win. That is what Elo was designed for, at least. FaceMash and Zuckerberg aside, people have deployed Elo ratings for many sports — soccer, football, basketball — and for domains as varied as dating, finance, and primatology. If something can be turned into a competition, it has probably been Elo-ed. Somehow, a simple chess algorithm has become an all-purpose tool for rating everything. In other words, when it comes to the preferred way to rate things, Elo ratings have the highest Elo rating. […]

Elo ratings don’t inherently have anything to do with chess. They’re based on a simple mathematical formula that works just as well for any one-on-one, zero-sum competition — which is to say, pretty much all sports. In 1997, a statistician named Bob Runyan adapted the formula to rank national soccer teams — a project so successful that FIFA eventually adopted an Elo system for its official rankings. Not long after, the statistician Jeff Sagarin applied Elo to rank NFL teams outside their official league standings. Things really took off when the new ESPN-owned version of Nate Silver’s 538 launched in 2014 and began making Elo ratings for many different sports. Some sports proved trickier than others. NBA basketball in particular exposed some of the system’s shortcomings, Neil Paine, a stats-focused sportswriter who used to work at 538, told me. It consistently underrated heavyweight teams, for example, in large part because it struggled to account for the meaninglessness of much of the regular season and the fact that either team might not be trying all that hard to win a given game. The system assumed uniform motivation across every team and every game. Pretty much anything, it turns out, can be framed as a one-on-one, zero-sum game.
Arpad Emmerich Elo, creator of the Elo rating system, understood the limitations of his invention. “It is a measuring tool, not a device of reward or punishment,” he once remarked. “It is a means to compare performances, assess relative strength, not a carrot waved before a rabbit, or a piece of candy given to a child for good behavior.”

I think I speak for everyone when I say…

By TwistedGreen • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

What?

Widely adopted, but how good is it?

By SpinyNorman • Score: 3 Thread

The goal of the Elo system is to predict who will win a chess game based on their difference in Elo ratings. There’s really two components to this - 1) deriving the player ratings, and 2) predicting what outcome to expect for a given difference in ratings.

Nowadays with machine learning we could easily learn a rating system that directly optimizes the goal of predicting match outcomes. It’d be interesting to do it and see how much better at predicting it would be than the Elo system.

EPA Will Make Polluters Pay To Clean Up Two ‘Forever Chemicals’

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader shares a report:
The Biden administration is designating two “forever chemicals,” man-made compounds that are linked to serious health risks, as hazardous substances under the Superfund law, shifting responsibility for their cleanup to polluters from taxpayers. The new rule announced on Friday empowers the government to force the many companies that manufacture or use perfluorooctanoic acid, also known as PFOA, and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid, known as PFOS, to monitor any releases into the environment and be responsible for cleaning them up. Those companies could face billions of dollars in liabilities.

[…] The announcement follows an extraordinary move last week from the E.P.A. mandating that water utilities reduce the PFAS in drinking water to near-zero levels. The agency has also proposed to designate seven additional PFAS chemicals as hazardous waste. “President Biden understands the threat that forever chemicals pose to the health of families across the country,” Michael S. Regan, the administrator of the E.P.A., said. “Designating these chemicals under our Superfund authority will allow E.P.A. to address more contaminated sites, take earlier action, and expedite cleanups, all while ensuring polluters pay for the costs to clean up pollution threatening the health of communities.”

True trickle down economics.

By Fly Swatter • Score: 3, Insightful Thread
The funds will come from increased prices from those companies, so once again trickle down economics pisses all over the little guy.

Re:True trickle down economics.

By Local ID10T • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

It probably won’t, because the costs will be tacked onto water bills, which can’t be avoided.

This is the downside to private companies providing services as regulated utilities: They have a legally mandated profit percentage.
Higher costs = higher charges = higher profits.

Superfund is poorly written

By bryanandaimee • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
Unfortunately it is often not the polluters that are stuck with the bill. My dad worked at a university that “bought” an old mining site for $1. I think it was for the geology department. Later on the site was declared a superfund site due to tailings from a mine that had operated there decades ago. The mining company was no longer around so guess who got stuck with the bill to clean up the new superfund site. The university. They had never run any polluting operations on the site, but the superfund law was written such that anyone that ever owned any part of the site can be held fully responsible whether or not they did any of the polluting.

Re: True trickle down economics.

By Mspangler • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

They are chemically inert which is why they were used (in fire suppression and as gaskets in chemically aggressive processes) and why they do not easily break down.

The problem is that their shape and charge distribution mimic certain biological molecules, and this turns out to possibly mess with certain hormones in the body.

How much of this is proven and how much is supposition is being argued. A similar problem surfaced a decade or more in the past with a chemical used to fireproof children’s pajamas. Chemically inert, biochemically active.

They will be tough to phase out completely as Viton and various similar gaskets are widely used in industry, including the Green ones.

Linus Torvalds on ‘Hilarious’ AI Hype

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
Linus Torvalds, discussing the AI hype, in a conversation with Dirk Hohndel, Verizon’s Head of the Open Source Program Office:
Torvalds snarked, “It’s hilarious to watch. Maybe I’ll be replaced by an AI model!” As for Hohndel, he thinks most AI today is “autocorrect on steroids.” Torvalds summed up his attitude as, “Let’s wait 10 years and see where it actually goes before we make all these crazy announcements.”

That’s not to say the two men don’t think AI will be helpful in the future. Indeed, Torvalds noted one good side effect already: “NVIDIA has gotten better at talking to Linux kernel developers and working with Linux memory management,” because of its need for Linux to run AI’s large language models (LLMs) efficiently.

Torvalds is also “looking forward to the tools actually to find bugs. We have a lot of tools, and we use them religiously, but making the tools smarter is not a bad thing. Using smarter tools is just the next inevitable step. We have tools that do kernel rewriting, with very complicated scripts, and pattern recognition. AI can be a huge help here because some of these tools are very hard to use because you have to specify things at a low enough level.” Just be careful, Torvalds warns of “AI BS.” Hohndel quickly quipped, “He meant beautiful science. You know, “Beautiful science in, beautiful science out.”

Pretty on point…

By Junta • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

It’s certainly categorically new and will have some applications, but there have been some rather persistent “oddities” that seem to limit the potential. Meanwhile some impossibly large amounts of money are being thrown as if the age of the artificial super intelligence is now a few months away.

Fully expect one of a few ways the scenario ends poorly for the big spenders:
-Turns out that our current approaches with any vaguely possible amount of resources will not provide qualitative experience significantly better than Copilot/ChatGPT today. It suddenly became an amazing demo from humble hilarious beginnings, but has kind of plateaued despite the massive spend, so this scenario wouldn’t surprise me.
-A breakthrough will happen that gets to “magic” but with a totally different sort of compute resource than folks have been pouring money into, making all the spending to date pointless.
-The “ASI” breakthrough happens and completely upends the way the economy works and renders all the big spending moot.

Linus has become the old man shaking his fist

By ihadafivedigituid • Score: 3 Thread
Linus totally misses the point, which is kind of unusual.

GPT-4/5/6 might not replace him as a kernel architect, but it sure as hell is (and will increasingly be) making a ton of people in a lot of industries waaay more productive. There isn’t an infinite supply of work, so a lot of jobs will go away—never to return.

And no, this isn’t some millennial/Zoomer potshot: I’m two years older than Linus …

Re:Linus has become the old man shaking his fist

By RitchCraft • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

No, he gets it. There’s way too much BS associated with this right now. “Autocorrect on steroids” is spot on.

Pattern of change

By Tablizer • Score: 3, Interesting Thread

> he thinks most AI today is “autocorrect on steroids.”

That is a step up, Jetsons or not.

A historian on NPR noticed that past technical booms have a common pattern: investors over-estimate the short-term impact but under-estimate the medium and longer-term impact.

Most the first batch of prominent Dot-Com co’s folded, but the next generation of co’s completely changed commerce, social interaction, and news.

The first railroad co’s overbuilt track and most failed or had to merge to survive. But the vast network of tracks eventually got heavily used and revolutionized commerce.

If AI follows that pattern, most initial ideas and companies will flop, but will plant the seeds for the next generation to thrive on.

However, that may be survivor bias. There was an AI boom in the late 80’s that failed to make a significant dent. We don’t know if the current batch will similarly stall for a few decades.

Re:Linus has become the old man shaking his fist

By DarkVader • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

They’re both right.

LLMs are garbage, completely incapable of replacing people, basically autocorrect on steroids. Lots of jobs will be lost. “Productivity” as measured by the amount of bullshit generated, will increase exponentially.

And the enshittification of everything will continue unabated.

Microsoft’s VASA-1 Can Deepfake a Person With One Photo and One Audio Track

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
Microsoft Research Asia earlier this week unveiled VASA-1, an AI model that can create a synchronized animated video of a person talking or singing from a single photo and an existing audio track. ArsTechnica:
In the future, it could power virtual avatars that render locally and don’t require video feeds — or allow anyone with similar tools to take a photo of a person found online and make them appear to say whatever they want. “It paves the way for real-time engagements with lifelike avatars that emulate human conversational behaviors,” reads the abstract of the accompanying research paper titled, “VASA-1: Lifelike Audio-Driven Talking Faces Generated in Real Time.” It’s the work of Sicheng Xu, Guojun Chen, Yu-Xiao Guo, Jiaolong Yang, Chong Li, Zhenyu Zang, Yizhong Zhang, Xin Tong, and Baining Guo.

The VASA framework (short for “Visual Affective Skills Animator”) uses machine learning to analyze a static image along with a speech audio clip. It is then able to generate a realistic video with precise facial expressions, head movements, and lip-syncing to the audio. It does not clone or simulate voices (like other Microsoft research) but relies on an existing audio input that could be specially recorded or spoken for a particular purpose.

Opportunities

By Randseed • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Surely this will not be abused.

VLOGGER, Google’s equivalent, released last month

By Khopesh • Score: 3 Thread

Just over a month ago, Google announced its VLOGGER AI that does this. (Yes, there’s a demo video in there too.)

This is pretty cool stuff and I can’t wait to see how it’s employed as lossy video compression for video calls: why transmit what you can render closely enough? This should be super-additive to the concurrent research being performed on recovering from data loss (Opus 1.5 just got such a feature).

Indian IT Outsourcing Firms Cut 60,000 Jobs in First Layoffs in 20 Years

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot
An anonymous reader shares a report:
TCS, Infosys, and Wipro, India’s top three IT outsourcing firms, have collectively seen their workforce shrink for the first time in at least 20 years. The trio reported a combined reduction of more than 63,750 employees in the financial year ending March 31, 2024.

Customers fed up with crappy quality?

By gweihir • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Say it aint so.

My best friend’s company has done that for years

By Zontar_Thing_From_Ve • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
My best friend works in IT for a privately held company in a major US metropolitan area. I have forgotten the name of his company. Almost none of you would have heard of it anyway. Their business segment is so specialized that probably almost none of you who read this comment would even work for a company that might use his company for what they provide. Anyway, he’s been there roughly 10 years. About 5 years ago, they started laying off some US based staff and replacing them with offshore people who live and work in India. They even replaced one of my friend’s US based colleagues who was an Indian guy with a Green Card. About 2-3 years ago the company decided that the offshore India staff “cost too much” so they made 100% of them go on contracts that they can cancel at any time. They have started slowly but surely replacing the India based staff with people in Nepal. Now the based in India staff are seriously worried about losing their jobs to people in Nepal. All I can say is that the race to the bottom to cut salaries on IT workers can’t end in anything good. I have no idea who this company would go to next if people in Nepal get “too expensive”.

Re:Hm

By Tony Isaac • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Well, that might be overstating AI’s capabilities. It probably CAN do what a typical outsource developer can do. But that’s a really low bar.

By the way, India does have a lot of great developers. They just don’t work for the outsource companies.

Not a chance

By rsilvergun • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
good enough is always good enough. If that wasn’t the case 90% of us wouldn’t be typing out /. posts on a windows PC.

And good enough can be shockingly terrible, especially when we’ve had 40 years of non stop mega mergers and zero anti-trust law enforcement. They could care less what you, the customer think, because your options are to shop at one of the other companies they either own or own a controlling share in or go without.

And increasingly “go without” isn’t an option because they’re buying critical infrastructure.

I don’t think the problem is regulatory capture

By rsilvergun • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
I think the problem is that we think of regulators as bureaucrats instead of as law enforcement. We mentally categorized them differently so we let them get away with behavior we would never in a million years allow with our police. We need to remember that the guys who enforce antitrust law and who Force Rich tax cheats to pay their taxes are cops just like any other cop.