Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest for 2018-Jun-27 today archive

Microsoft Teases First-Ever 'Stream-To-Win' Option Built Into Xbox

Posted by BeauHDView on SlashDotShareable Link
At this month's E3, Microsoft confirmed "a first in the booming world of game streaming," reports Ars Technica. "It's a subtle thing, which we're dubbing 'stream-to-win,' and it sees Microsoft take its boldest step in battling the behemoth service Twitch." From the report: Horizon 4 will be the first Microsoft Studios game to recognize when players broadcast their live gameplay via Mixer and then give out bonuses within that game for doing so (Mixer is a Twitch-like service that Microsoft acquired in 2016 before re-dubbing it Beam). All Xbox One consoles received an update last year to integrate one-button "stream to Mixer" support, which players can swap to Twitch by going through the system's options.

In the week-plus since learning this about Horizon 4, we have been unable to find a comparable feature in any video game -- meaning, one that recognizes a broadcast (on Mixer, Twitch, or any other service) and then gives out goodies inside the same video game as a reward. Some video games already include official and deep integration with Twitch and Mixer, but these rely largely on audience-driven votes, like in the digital card game Superfight and the battle royale game Darwin Project.

Ticketmaster UK Admits Personal Data Stolen In Hack Attack

Posted by BeauHDView on SlashDotShareable Link
An anonymous reader quotes a report from BBC: Ticketmaster has admitted that it has suffered a security breach, which the BBC understands has affected up to 40,000 UK customers. Malicious software on third-party customer support product Inbenta Technologies caused the hack, the firm said on Twitter. "Some personal or payment information may have been accessed by an unknown third party," it added. All affected customers have been contacted.

In the email to those customers, Ticketmaster said it had set up a website to answer any questions and advised them to reset their passwords. It also offered them a free 12-month identity monitoring service. It said the breach was likely to have only affected UK customers who purchased or attempted to purchase tickets between February and 23 June 2018. But, as a precaution, it said it had also informed international customers who had purchased or attempted to purchase tickets between September 2017 and 23 June 2018.

Betting Giant BetVictor Leaked a List of Its Own Internal Systems Passwords

Posted by msmashView on SlashDotShareable Link
A popular betting platform left a password list for its internal systems on its website for anyone to find. From a report: BetVictor, a Gibraltar-based betting site, has since removed the two-page document containing a list of links to back office systems, including usernames and passwords. Chris Hogben found the document through the customer support search box on the company's homepage. The customer support pop-up allowed users to search the site's knowledge base of questions and answers. "Logins/Links to Back Offices - Internal," read the document's title, which contained over two-dozen passwords to the company's trading platform, ticketing system, and Experian's identity verification service, Hogben told ZDNet.

Google Doubles Down on Linux and Open Source

Posted by msmashView on SlashDotShareable Link
Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols, writing for ZDNet: Google couldn't exist without Linux and open-source software. While you may not think of Google as a Linux company in the same way as you do Canonical, Red Hat, or SUSE, it wouldn't be the search and advertising giant it is today without Linux. So, it makes sense that Google is moving up from its Silver membership in The Linux Foundation, to the Platinum level. With this jump in status, Google gets a seat on the Foundation's board of directors. This position will be filled by Sarah Novotny, the head of open source strategy for Google Cloud Platform. Earlier this week, Chinese tech giant Tencent joined the Linux Foundation as a platinum member.

Microsoft

By darkain • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread

Why do I get the feeling this is less about Google doubling-down on Open Source / Linux, and has more to do with the fact they don't want to be out-done by Microsoft, who is already a Platinum level member. This is just more of a corporate pissing contest.

I'll believe it when...

By sremick • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread

...we finally get a Linux client for Google Drive.

Re:Microsoft

By jellomizer • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

That and if you have millions/billions of dollars invested in a Linux Infrastructure. Do you really want your competitors make decisions on what direction the product takes?

Apple, Samsung Settle After Fighting Seven Years in Court

Posted by msmashView on SlashDotShareable Link
Apple and Samsung reached a settlement in their U.S. patent battle, putting an end to a seven-year fight over smartphone designs. From a report: The string of lawsuits started in 2011 when Apple sued Samsung for allegedly copying the design of the iPhone in the creation of its own line of smartphones. Terms of the accord weren't immediately disclosed. The settlement follows a damages retrial in which Apple won a $539 million jury award in May.

Re:Timing error...

By Freischutz • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Apple sued Samsung for allegedly copying the design of the iPhone in the creation of its own line of smartphones

Samsung was making smartphones back in 2001, when Apple was trying to figure out how to copy Creative's MP3 player. Apple may have complained about Samsung copying the iPhone for a later line of smartphones, but Samsung was one of the early pioneers in the smartphone space, well before Apple even thought about getting into the space.

So Samsung has been making mobile phones for a while. What the hell does that have to do with anything? I remember the original Samsung smartphones. They were so similar to the 1-3G iPhones I inadvertently walked off with a Samsung phone a couple of times when I mistook one for my iPhone 3G. Here's a graphic that kind of says it all: http://allthingsd.com/files/20... I saw one of the first Android prototypes too. It was a half screen and half keyboard affair that was clearly meant to be a Blackberry killer. Nobody took Apple seriously as a phone manufacturer, they all figured Apple would bring out some kind of glorified iPod with a keypad. When the iPhone hit the market everybody went back to the drawing board and the next thing you know they're all, by some cosmic coincidence, selling phones that look like more or less exactly like the iPhone. But of course none of them copied what Apple was doing ... perish the thought.

This is very bad news ...

By Alain Williams • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

for all the lawyers involved.

Laptop Vendors Are Left Sitting On the Sidelines Waiting For the Next Waltz To Start

Posted by msmashView on SlashDotShareable Link
An anonymous reader shares a report: Intel's delayed release of a new processor is going to have a noticeable effect on the laptop market this year. As there is little chance of seeing anything new until towards the end of this year, laptop designers will not be able to offer new models for the holidays and will instead have to rework existing products. DigiTimes suggests we will see trimmed down models with lower price tags to try to entice consumers into purchasing something, as they expect lower demand than we saw last year. Hopefully some gaming machines may become more affordable, or we will start to see models incorporating AMD's new chips become more common.

Laptop vendors are can do more than new CPUs...

By ctilsie242 • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread

Laptop vendors can do more than new CPUs to bring some usefulness and features. Being able to have an OS in ROM would be handy, if only to have a way to restore an OS without having to worry about recovery media. If a Tandy MS-DOS clone back in the 1980s can do this, so can a PC vendor. Other things come to mind as well, be it the ability to charge (albeit slowly) on USB-C for beefier laptops, allowing for multiple USB chargers to charge a battery at the same time, built in vitualization and encryption so one can have their gaming stuff, their work stuff, personal stuff, and stuff nobody should see, all on one laptop, perhaps using something like PhonebookFS to further hide the presence of other VMs.

Another idea would be to have better support for external GPU breakout boxes. That way, one can go from running command line stuff to Crysis fairly easily, as well as providing fast access to additional storage.

CPUs are nice, but there are still many things that can be done to differentiate one's product from everyone else.

NASA Again Delays Launch of Troubled Webb Telescope

Posted by msmashView on SlashDotShareable Link
In a blow to NASA's prestige and its budget, America's next great space telescope has been postponed again. From a report: NASA announced on Wednesday that the James Webb Space Telescope, once scheduled to be launched into orbit around the sun this fall, will take three more years and another billion dollars to complete. A report delivered to NASA by an independent review board estimated that the cost of the troubled Webb telescope would now be $9.66 billion, and that it would not be ready to launch until March 30, 2021.

Again?

By 110010001000 • Score: 3 • Thread
Why don't they take my recommendation and build a space factory and use that to build the telescope? They could mine asteroids to get the raw material. That would save us from having to build it on Earth and deliver it to space. It would already be there! We could then reassign those factories to build other useful things.

Another year

By Tailhook • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

It was only four months ago that they kicked JWST out to 2020. SLS got delayed to 2019 and is now being audited by the OIG; expect that report to be another shit show, followed by another delay to 2020.

Re:Time for a special project

By arth1 • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Perhaps the project just should be canned.
If not falling for the sunk cost fallacy, but completely disregarding how much we have already spent, will the now needed money (and realistically, multiply it by 3) buy us something that gives us more than if the money is spent on something else?
If the latter, axe the project.

And given how old and outdated this project already is, my inclination is to spend that money on new technology for new problems, not what was designed 15-11 years ago, and will still cost us more now than what was budgeted back then.

Re:Remove all the private contractors

By Eravnrekaree • Score: 4, Interesting • Thread

Part of the problem with NASAs cost is congressional mandates as pork barell to districts with the plants. Shelby comes to mind. If NASA were more independent of congress perhaps their engineers could exert more discipline on their suppliers and select based on best value?

Yawn

By Green Mountain Bot • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
I'm old enough to remember when the Hubble Space Telescope was an expensive boondoggle that would never produce valuable science. How did that turn out?

Google Home Speakers and Chromecast Are Down Worldwide, Company Confirms

Posted by msmashView on SlashDotShareable Link
"Sorry, something went wrong. Try again in a few seconds." That's the response that Google smart speaker users around the world heard Wednesday when they asked their devices to play music, get the weather or even respond to its "Hey, Google" prompt. From a report: Google confirmed there's a problem with both their smart speakers and the Chromecast, the plug-in video casting dongle for televisions. While the company did not say how many people are affected or what caused the issue, it did confirm it's working on a fix. "We're aware of an issue affecting some Google Home and Chromecast users. We're investigating the issue and working on a solution," Google said in a statement. Google Home and Chromecast owners started reporting issues to Google early Wednesday morning, according to online help forums for both devices. Devices affected by the problem have lost their normal functions.

Confirmed; Happened to me this morning

By The-Ixian • Score: 3 • Thread

My Google Home is used, among other things, as my alarm clock.

This morning, the alarm went off as normal, but after about the third tone it said "Sorry, something went wrong..."

Every attempt to activate it after that produced the same thing.

I even reset it. It would then respond, but when I asked it to play the news or music it went back to the "something went wrong" BS.

Figured I would troubleshoot when I got home today. Interesting to know that I am not the only one.

Washington Post

By cliffjumper222 • Score: 3 • Thread

Of course, the WaPo would report this!

It was to be expected but...

By Teun • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread
That the home speakers need net access to slurp your data was to be expected.
But as someone that contemplated (past tense) getting a Chromecast I am still surprised the damn thing can't stream from laptop or phone to the TV without accessing Google.

Why Chromecast?

By klingens • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

I understand that internet-of-shit things like Google Home cannot work when the server end which does the actual speech rec is down. That's why no one sane buys such crap after Nest. And whoever still buys it deserves anything he gets.

However, Chromecast ist a doodad for my TV so my Android Smartphone or Chrome browser can push whatever is on their screen to my big TV, right? This is a cheapo 5cent ARM CPU with 500MB of RAM and a wireless adapter. Basically a small step up from a ESP8266. Why would this need an Internet connection to a mothership? No speech rec or similar. What for? It's by definition in my LAN/WLAN only. Can someone explain this to someone else who owns neither a chromecast nor a spying microphone?

Google-over-Slack

By Chelloveck • Score: 3 • Thread

Wait a minute... Slack was offline this morning too. Does this mean Google Home is using Slack as its transport layer?

Frankly, I'm not sure if I'm joking here.

The Billionaire Space Race Is Making Life Difficult for Airlines

Posted by msmashView on SlashDotShareable Link
On Feb. 6, Elon Musk's SpaceX launched its largest rocket into the blue Florida sky. Onboard was "Starman," a dummy strapped into the billionaire's cherry red Tesla roadster. Minutes later, fans cheered as Musk topped himself by nailing a simultaneous landing of the Falcon Heavy's boosters. It was arguably a turning point for the commercial space age. Airlines were somewhat less thrilled. From a report: On that day, 563 flights were delayed and 62 extra miles added to flights in the southeast region of the U.S., according to Federal Aviation Administration data released Tuesday by the Air Line Pilots Association, or ALPA.

America's airspace is a finite resource, and the growth of commercial launches has U.S. airlines worried. Whenever Musk or one of his rivals sends up a spacecraft, the carriers which operate closer to the ground must avoid large swaths of territory and incur sizable expenses. Most of the commercial activity to date has been focused on Cape Canaveral, the Air Force post on Florida's Atlantic coast, where Musk's Space Exploration Technologies and Jeff Bezos's Blue Origin base their stellar operations. It is one of 22 active U.S. launch sites, and a number of other locales -- including Brownsville, Texas; Watkins, Colorado; and Camden County, Georgia -- are pursuing new spaceport ventures to capitalize on commercial space activity.

Space launches for satellites to route planes

By swb • Score: 3 • Thread

We just had a story where airlines could save "big. big, money, huge money" using satellite comms to reroute planes. How the fuck are they supposed to get the satellites up there if they can't launch them on rockets?

Once that sat net is up, airlines will just route around the rocket plume like a road closure.

Re:Technology advances and the world changes

By KiloByte • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

Except... airlines are useful. Private expeditions to Mars are not.

Your leisure or business flight does nothing to advance humanity. Space research, on the other hand...

Re:Technology advances and the world changes

By Strider- • Score: 4, Informative • Thread

Many rocket launches have strict launch requirements. To efficiently reach the ISS, the launch window for the rocket is instantaneous. If it launches late, it's going to wind up in the wrong orbit, and take much longer to reach the ISS. It's a similar story for many other launches, such as those that are launching into sun synchronous orbits.

Re:Technology advances and the world changes

By nukenerd • Score: 4, Informative • Thread

Rockets do not take long to pass through controlled airspace and they pass through it vertically so they should not need a huge area around them to be closed for extended periods of time

I suppose they are allowing for the possibility or likelihood of the rocket blowing up, Challenger style, and sending a spinning Tesla a long way in a random direction.

Let's blame "billionaires" - like Bloomberg

By mi • Score: 3 • Thread

Whenever Musk or one of his rivals sends up a spacecraft

Damn those evil soulless billionaires! If only it were NASA doing the launches, things would've been completely different...

the carriers which operate closer to the ground must avoid large swaths of territory and incur sizable expenses

Those are FAA requirements, from the same people, who only a few years ago claimed (and compelled the airlines to claim), your cellphone could bring down your airliner...

Satellites Could Show Airplanes Faster Long-Haul Routes in Mid-Air

Posted by msmashView on SlashDotShareable Link
The promise of powerful satellite constellations orbiting hundreds of miles above the earth can seem, well, a little distant. But what if they could make long-haul flights faster? From a report: Operators like Iridium and Inmarsat are promising that jet liners linked to space communications networks can save fliers money, time and carbon impact, as more efficient flights cut fuel use. Today, an airliner flying five miles over the open ocean, beyond the reach of the radar systems used by civil air controllers, is dependent on flight plans written well before take-off, and what pilots could report over the radio to scattered air traffic controllers. Weather bulletins still arrive in the cockpit as brief text messages. But a true global communications network -- one orbit around the earth -- could give pilots the flexibility to react to changing situations in real time, the same way Google Maps now allows drivers to re-route around traffic jams as they drive.

another great feature

By iggymanz • Score: 3 • Thread

right now we can lose aircraft over sea and not even know which direction they went.

at least this way we'll be able to pick up body parts

Re:It's not like they don't plan now, do they?

By tlhIngan • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

Is the idea that flight routes aren't already optimally planned? That existing weather systems that might impact a specific flight aren't built into the flight plan, with fine adjustments made by pilots to alter course based on actual flight path conditions?

The summary makes it sound like planes aren't already flying the shortest possible path already. I mean, airspace over the open ocean is pretty goddamn empty, it's not like they're trying to avoid a jam-up on the 405.

Flights over the Atlantic are coordinated between Canada and the UK. There is a set of 10 "routes" each way and the air traffic agency responsible (Canada for east to west, UK for west to east) sets up the routes (which vary daily) and the scheduling of aircraft on the routes.

This is done so while aircraft are over the middle of the Atlantic where there is no radar coverage, they won't encounter traffic - either because they're running into slower traffic ahead, traffic going the other way, or traffic beside them.

It's not the most efficient, but it's the safest route - and very little deviation is allowed.

And yes, there are traffic jams, which is why there are 10 different "lanes" going both ways.

The thing is, ADS-B (yes, ADS-B) is being implemented worldwide. Unlike the US system though, most countries are going with a space-based satellite system, so your ADS-B transponder will talk to the satellites. (The US went with ground based systems because there is so much airplane traffic that it would overload the satellites). With this it means the location of all aircraft will be known, so it will be possible to control aircraft beyond radar coverage (just because they are beyond radar coverage doesn't mean they are beyond radio range - satellite messaging and HF radio allow all aircraft to still be in communication).

Space is Full of Dirty, Toxic Grease, Scientists Reveal

Posted by msmashView on SlashDotShareable Link
An anonymous reader shares a report: It looks cold, dark and empty, but astronomers have revealed that interstellar space is permeated with a fine mist of grease-like molecules. The study provides the most precise estimate yet of the amount of "space grease" in the Milky Way, by recreating the carbon-based compounds in the laboratory. The Australian-Turkish team discovered more than expected: 10 billion trillion trillion tonnes of gloop, or enough for 40 trillion trillion trillion packs of butter. Prof Tim Schmidt, a chemist at the University of New South Wales, Sydney and co-author of the study, said that the windscreen of a future spaceship travelling through interstellar space might be expected to get a sticky coating. "Amongst other stuff it'll run into is interstellar dust, which is partly grease, partly soot and partly silicates like sand," he said, adding that the grease is swept away within our own solar system by the solar wind. The findings bring scientists closer to figuring out the total amount of carbon in interstellar space, which fuels the formation of stars, planets and is essential for life.

Packs of Butter?

By burhop • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

Could someone convert that to american football fields for me? I can't do metric.

Of Course It Is

By forkfail • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

Of course space is full of grease.

Just think of what would happen if the galaxy were not properly greased. It would be like trying to drive a truck with no axle grease for the axles. Things would quickly come to a grinding halt from all the friction of the rotation of the galaxy.

And what's worse, it's not under warranty!

Helpful

By drew_kime • Score: 5, Funny • Thread

10 billion trillion trillion tonnes of gloop, or enough for 40 trillion trillion trillion packs of butter.

I'm glad they converted it into something easier to get my head around.

Move over truffle oil...

By Muckluck • Score: 3 • Thread
I want my fries coated in a light mist of space grease. MMMMMM, space fats.......

Re:Dark Matter

By Joce640k • Score: 4, Informative • Thread

Grammar Nazis, keeping us on the straightened arrow.

Finally, It's the Year of the Linux... Supercomputer

Posted by msmashView on SlashDotShareable Link
Beeftopia writes: From ZDNet: "The latest TOP500 Supercomputer list is out. What's not surprising is that Linux runs on every last one of the world's fastest supercomputers. Linux has dominated supercomputing for years. But, Linux only took over supercomputing lock, stock, and barrel in November 2017. That was the first time all of the TOP500 machines were running Linux. Before that IBM AIX, a Unix variant, was hanging on for dear life low on the list."

An interesting architectural note: "GPUs, not CPUs, now power most of supercomputers' speed."

Re:Linus

By Wookie Monster • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread
The Github that sold for $7.5B wasn't the same Github that was created in three months. Hundreds of people, working for ten years made Github worth $7.5B. That initial version wasn't worth any more than the time spent developing it.

Good for Linux!

By QuietLagoon • Score: 5, Informative • Thread
And congrats to all that support and develop for it, especially one Mr Linus Benedict Torvalds.

Curmudgeon factor

By erp_consultant • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

Let's face it, as bright and influential as Torvalds has been, and continues to be, most people would not rate him highly on the warm and fuzzy scale. He is not a man that seeks approval. He is not a man that wants to be in the spotlight.

In some ways I think he is like Steve Wozniak. Just a shy, quiet but brilliant engineer that would rather just be left alone than doing the cocktail party circuit.

History tends to reward the Musks and Jobs of this world who are very smart in their own right but also very adept at self promotion.

I tend to have more respect for Linus and Woz. They are the men behind the curtain doing all the heavy lifting.

Re:Curmudgeon factor

By Areyoukiddingme • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

History tends to reward the Musks and Jobs of this world who are very smart in their own right but also very adept at self promotion.

Very adept at self promotion? Have you seen Elon Musk speak? He's a nerd. The quintessential nerd, with a head full of facts and figures and very poor command of his tongue. People lionize him and promote him, then blame him for self promoting, when in fact he's absolutely terrible at actually promoting himself. He talks about ideas and business activities and people call that self promotion. There's very little mention of himself, except when the interviewer inevitably asks, "Why are you doing this?" Then he answers with his, "I think humanity should be a multiplanetary species." That's about the only time he says "I think". The rest of the time, he's busy telling you what his companies are doing, and people somehow interpret that as self promotion.

As opposed to what a Kardashian is saying, which is somehow.... fine? Humans baffle me.

Kids these days

By Areyoukiddingme • Score: 5, Interesting • Thread

An interesting architectural note: "GPUs, not CPUs, now power most of supercomputers' speed."

Who is this beeftopia guy who is so monumentally ignorant of the history of supercomputing? That's not an "interesting architectural note". That's supercomputing since the very beginning of supercomputing. Supercomputers are supercomputers specifically because they had vector processors, before "GPU" was even a recognizable acronym. When PCs had nothing but framebuffers, supercomputers had vector processors. That was the point of building them. Once the GPU was invented, utilizing them to build a supercomputer was an inevitability.

And get off my lawn!

Japan's Hayabusa 2 Spacecraft Reaches Cosmic 'Diamond'

Posted by msmashView on SlashDotShareable Link
A Japanese spacecraft has arrived at its target - an asteroid shaped like a diamond or, according to some, a spinning top. From a report: Hayabusa 2 has been travelling toward the space rock Ryugu since launching from the Tanegashima spaceport in 2014. It is on a quest to study the object close-up and deliver rocks and soil from Ryugu to Earth. It will use explosives to propel a projectile into Ryugu, digging out a fresh sample from beneath the surface. Dr Makoto Yoshikawa, Hayabusa 2's mission manager, talked about the plan now that the spacecraft had arrived at its destination. "At first, we will study very carefully the surface features. Then we will select where to touch down. Touchdown means we get the surface material," he told me. A copper projectile, or "impactor" will separate from the spacecraft, floating down to the surface of the asteroid. Once Hayabusa 2 is safely out of the way, an explosive charge will detonate, driving the projectile into the surface.

Ryu Hayabusa?

By xxxJonBoyxxx • Score: 3 • Thread
>> Hayabusa 2 has been travelling toward the space rock Ryugu

Did someone intentionally sprinkle the name "Ryu Hayabusa" into mission? I have a bad feeling about this...

Ryu-cy in the Sky, with diamonds

By Oswald McWeany • Score: 3 • Thread

The Beatles must be very happy. It's "Ryu-cy in the sky, with diamonds."

Google Opens Its Human-Sounding Duplex AI To Public Testing

Posted by msmashView on SlashDotShareable Link
Google is moving ahead with Duplex, the stunningly human-sounding artificial intelligence software behind its new automated system that places phone calls on your behalf with a natural-sounding voice instead of a robotic one. From a report: The search giant said Wednesday it's beginning public testing of the software, which debuted in May and which is designed to make calls to businesses and book appointments. Duplex instantly raised questions over the ethics and privacy implications of using an AI assistant to hold lifelike conversations for you. Google says its plan is to start its public trial with a small group of "trusted testers" and businesses that have opted into receiving calls from Duplex. Over the "coming weeks," the software will only call businesses to confirm business and holiday hours, such as open and close times for the Fourth of July. People will be able to start booking reservations at restaurants and hair salons starting "later this summer."

Excellent AI

By Anonymous Coward • Score: 3, Funny • Thread

Duplex instantly raised questions over the ethics and privacy implications of using an AI assistant to hold lifelike conversations for you

That's some amazing AI if it's raising questions about its own use

Phonesex Chatbot When?

By Merk42 • Score: 4, Funny • Thread
Just change the goals of the Duplex bot and watch the technology really take off.

If I learned one thing from the age of modems...

By SuperKendall • Score: 4, Funny • Thread

Never go Full Duplex.

Lying headline

By Actually, I do RTFA • Score: 3 • Thread

It's not a "public" test in any sense of the word. It's a test between whitelisted earlier adopters on both sides of the call.

By that definition, I suppose my bank account routing numbers are "public" because several select institutions know them and communicate them to each other on my behalf.

Instagram Is Estimated To Be Worth More Than $100 Billion

Posted by BeauHDView on SlashDotShareable Link
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Bloomberg: Facebook's Instagram is estimated to be worth more than $100 billion, if it were a stand-alone company, marking a 100-fold return for the app purchased in 2012, according to data compiled by Bloomberg Intelligence. The photo-sharing platform, which reached 1 billion monthly active users earlier this month, will likely help nudge Instagram revenue past $10 billion over the next 12 months, Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Jitendra Waral wrote in a report Monday. Instagram is attracting new users faster than Facebook's main site and is on track to exceed 2 billion users within the next five years, Waral said. While the social network already has surpassed that milestone, Instagram's audience is younger than its parent, making it more attractive to advertisers. And unlike Facebook, Instagram is still growing in the U.S.

Sigh.

By ledow • Score: 3 • Thread

"will likely help nudge Instagram revenue past $10 billion over the next 12 months... and is on track to exceed 2 billion users within the next five years"

So you're telling me that you make $5 a user a year? How? Where? Doing what? Who's paying that? Why are they paying that? What are they getting back for that $5?

Advertisers really are a special kind of insane.

Estimated by who?

By aglider • Score: 3 • Thread

Estimated accordingly to which values?

How is this possible?

By Vegan Cyclist • Score: 3 • Thread

I haven't used the iOS app in some time, but the Android app is a total and utter piece of crap. The people responsible for programming it are about as credible as this estimated valuation.

Yesterday I tried creating a post, and the text wouldn't populate. The image would appear, but no text. Couldn't reply to people either. Yes, it was the latest version. Is this how a $100 billion app is supposed to function?

It's plagued with problems like this, plus so much more is wrong with it - from unreliable and seemingly random notifications to the non-chronological timeline, to inane interaction 'rules' (like how for the longest time to reply to someone you pretty much had to type out their handle - this is finally better at least). The people programming and designing this are being rewarded for just about the worst-functioning app out there. What a world.

Re:Bubblegram reaches 100 billion chucky tokens

By ceoyoyo • Score: 4, Informative • Thread

You might be a bit optimistic on Instagram profit. I couldn't find any actual numbers but social media companies don't seem to have quite the profit margins you'd think they should. They love to talk about revenue though.

The bigger problem: P/E of 30 isn't so bad for a rapidly growing company with lots of potential. But what about a company who's users already comprise a large fraction of the population of the planet? How much can Instagram actually grow? And if it does manage to double it's profits, is 15-20 years for breakeven (of a social media company) reasonable?

Re:A better way to look at valuation

By eepok • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Instagram is how young people communicate, Facebook is how us older people communicate. Killing Instagram today, could mean today's kids when they get into the market and want to communicate with business contacts will probably be split up across many competing services.

Let's not over-inflate Instagram or Facebook as general "communication". It's how people chat about less-important things. Yes, some conversations have significant value, but neither platform is built to facilitate thoughtful conversation and thus it doesn't happen to the extent people like to think it does.

If Facebook and Instagram were to die, people would find another place to chat. Communication would continue on, unabated, via email, phone, forums, in-person conversation, and the like.

Blogger Stabbed To Death After Internet Abuse Seminar

Posted by BeauHDView on SlashDotShareable Link
A prominent Japanese blogger has been stabbed to death minutes after giving a seminar on how to resolve personal disputes on the internet. The Guardian reports: Media reports said Kenichiro Okamoto, better known by his blogger name Hagex, died on Sunday evening after reportedly being attacked by a man he had argued with online. The suspect, Hidemitsu Matsumoto, allegedly followed Okamoto into the toilets after he had ended his talk at a venue in the south-western city of Fukuoka.

Okamoto was stabbed several times before staggering out of the toilets after his assailant, who fled on a bicycle, according to the Mainichi Shimbun newspaper. Okamoto, who sustained stab wounds to the chest and neck, was taken to hospital where he was confirmed dead. His attacker reportedly handed himself in almost three hours after the attack.

Re: Okamoto Killed in Fukuoka

By cayenne8 • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread
Sounds like they need "sensible knife laws" in Japan....

Re:Wrong assumption

By sinij • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Unfortunately, doxing is a thing regardless of how you behave. There are plenty of rational, civil, and well-meaning people that were dragged by a social mob. It is almost arbitrary on who gets targeted and why.
 
  Acting rationally and civilly is a handicap if your goal is to advance your ideas. Slogans and soundbites, shaming and insulting, and marginalization and uncharitable vilification of opposing views is by far more effective.
 
This isn't how it should be, but this is how it is. Our society and norms are not designed for instant, global, and non-individual communication.

Re:The illusion of safety

By bill_mcgonigle • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

Killing somebody in anger is only "easy' if you're a psychopath. It's hard to imagine a non-psychopath saying such a thing. Who's anger raises to the level of murderousness? That's serious mental illness - which is the real violence problem in society.

I'll tell you who does want to kill you though - Mao, Stalin, Pol-Pot, Leopold II, and Hitler. They are empirically far more dangerous.

Re:The illusion of safety

By Notabadguy • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

Killing somebody in anger is only "easy' if you're a psychopath. It's hard to imagine a non-psychopath saying such a thing. Who's anger raises to the level of murderousness? That's serious mental illness - which is the real violence problem in society.

I'll tell you who does want to kill you though - Mao, Stalin, Pol-Pot, Leopold II, and Hitler. They are empirically far more dangerous.

Killing someone in anger *is* easy. That's a crime of passion, and it happens all the time, around the world. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

You don't have to be a psychopath, nor a sociopath for that, you only need to recognize that humans are prone to fits of extremes. In fact, being a psychopath is the absolute opposite of killing someone in anger. It's killing someone without feeling anything. I think I'm probably a psychopath; but I haven't killed enough people to tell.

I said all that to say this - human life is cheap. There are more of us every day. There haven't even been any significant wars or depopulation events in living memory to make us feel fragile as a species. There are plenty of people who can look around themselves and see that no one is particularly important. Taking a life is socially repugnant, but ultimately irrelevant.

If you've seen the movie "Punisher" or movies like it and thought, "Those men deserved to die," you're closer to the latter. If you refuse to watch it, or have seen it and thought, "He has no right to kill those men" you're closer to the former. In the context of this article, I treat everyone with respect - even people I hate, and it amazes me every time I see someone provoke another intentionally to rage - because you never know who might be ready to justify killing you - ranging from that blind rage crime of passion, to the coldly calculated, "I can make the world a little better for their absence."

Re:How Could This Happen...

By lgw • Score: 4, Insightful • Thread

When are you guys going to start a revolution with your pea-shooters? I heard that is why you need them: to protect us from a tyrannical government. So...when?

If it's ever necessary, it will happen the same way it did last time. Citizens with guns, mostly ex-military and led by ex-military, will take military armories on the first day of the war. Military bases are gun-free zones, after all. (Yes, really, a soldier can't even carry his own personal gun on base.)

Half the militia that fought the British troops in the Battles of Lexington and Concord were exactly the cliche - bunches of dumb, poorly trained hicks all related to one another. But half weren't, and they accomplished something.

If you don't know US history, it might surprise you that the war started when the governor sent troops to confiscate military-style weapons from the populace. Didn't work out well for him, in the end.

We May Be All Alone In the Known Universe, a New Oxford Study Suggests

Posted by BeauHDView on SlashDotShareable Link
A new study by Oxford University's Future of Humanity Institute determined that it's quite likely humans are alone in the observable universe. Fortune reports: The study looked at the Fermi paradox -- the apparent discrepancy between the seeming likelihood of alien life, given the billions of stars similar to our sun, and the scant evidence that such life actually exists. The paradox was named after physicist Enrico Fermi, who famously asked his colleagues at Los Alamos, N.M.. "Where Is Everyone?"

The study authors then examined various hypotheses and equations used to resolve the Fermi paradox. The results weren't pretty: "Our main result is to show that proper treatment of scientific uncertainties dissolves the Fermi paradox by showing that it is not at all unlikely ex ante for us to be alone in the Milky Way, or in the observable universe. Our second result is to show that, taking account of observational bounds on the prevalence of other civilizations, our updated probabilities suggest that there is a substantial probability that we are alone."
SpaceX CEO Elon Musk cited the study's conclusions as an "added impetus" for humanity to become a spacefaring civilization capable of extending life beyond Earth. He tweeted: "This is why we must preserve the light of consciousness by becoming a spacefaring civilization & extending life to other planets..."

Re:Fermi Paradox is useless

By ilguido • Score: 4, Informative • Thread

The Fermi Paradox is an utterly useless test. It takes variables you have no data on and then says to compute their probability.

There are not variables in the Fermi Paradox, otherwise it would not be a paradox but an equation or a function. I do not know why you mentioned an equation, but probably it is because you do not know what we are talking about.

Note: I find it particularly annoying that random guys on the internet think they are masters of the known universe and _every time_ there is a discussion, you have to read caustic, trenchant comments using words like "utterly useless", "drunk frat students", "easily published paper out to boo[t] their careers". Discussions are rational processes, not political calls to arms, where you have to convey simple concepts to masses of mindless commoners.

Re:With morons like Trump "running things"

By Oswald McWeany • Score: 4 • Thread

Should we move to Mars? It will be very expensive and mostly pointless.

How about we spend all that money looking after the place where conditions are suitable and we know we can survive?

Why not both? It certainly isn't "pointless" to want to expand the human condition and strive to create a backup for earth and all life as we know it.

It's not an either/or scenario. No-one is talking about moving the entire human population to mars- that would defeat the purpose. We can try to restore earth and maintain a population on Earth, which will always be the most suitable place for human habitation AND at the same time expand into the solar system- starting with Mars.

There's a lot of empty space in the Universe. Let's fill it up. Proxima 3 needs a Starbucks.

Re:Fermi Paradox is useless

By swillden • Score: 5, Informative • Thread

The Fermi Paradox is an utterly useless test. It takes variables you have no data on and then says to compute their probability.

You mean the Drake equation, not the Fermi Paradox, and you're wrong about its usefulness, as you'd know if you bothered to read the paper. The authors make a very convincing statistical argument that the Drake equation actually resolves the Fermi Paradox.

Statistical probability, to be of any use in the real world at all, must by definition be based off already measurable data.

True

That we have basically no measurement of any of this data

False. As the paper points out, we can estimate the distribution of many of the astrophysical numbers with relatively low uncertainty -- a few orders of magnitude. And while the others are much more difficult, when we don't know how to estimate a parameter, it is often feasible to bound the parameter and estimate the degree of uncertainty. In this case, the authors construct plausible estimates for the uncertainty of the really difficult parameters. The uncertainties are enormous precisely because we know so little. For example, they estimate that our best estimate of f_l ranges over 200 orders of magnitude. They note that this is a conservative estimate, that the actual uncertainty may be much larger, but that larger uncertainties merely strengthen their result.

The authors assume that the parameter values are uniformly distributed, calculate the resulting PDF of N and conclude that based on our best knowledge (which is very poor -- that's the whole point of the paper, to make sure the paucity of data is properly considered), there is a significant probability that we are alone in the galaxy, and in the observable universe. Their PDF also shows that there is a significant probability that we are not alone. In fact the probabilities of being alone and not being alone are close to equal.

Thus, the paper rigorously demonstrates that the Fermi Paradox is not paradoxical, precisely because we cannot estimate the parameters to Drake's equation. They show that because our knowledge is so poor, universes that are both empty and teeming with intelligent life fall well within the bounds of a careful, rational, and mathematical analysis based on our best knowledge.

In short, they rigorously demonstrated that your intuition about Drake's equation is correct, that our knowledge of the parameters is so weak that the resulting equation does not allow us to predict anything.

However, they also note that the amount of effort we've put into SETI provides us with actual data we can use to revise our estimates of the Drake Equation parameters, albeit only a little bit. They apply Bayes Theorem under a few different models to update their uncertainty estimates, and use the updated parameters to recalculate the probability that we're alone. This is a process that we can continue over time, updating the parameter PDFs based on observations (of various kind, not just SETI null results), gradually narrowing the uncertainty.

That a paper from Oxford uses it is, one would hope, a joke from a couple drunk frat students hoping to get an easily published paper out to boos their careers.

You should read the paper. It's actually quite carefully reasoned and interesting.

Re:With morons like Trump "running things"

By Immerman • Score: 5, Insightful • Thread

>The universe is still young by cosmological scales. Why do they assume that extraterrestrial life has to be zipping around the universe building Dyson spheres and shit? How do they know that there isn't life elsewhere that is less advanced than us, as advanced as us or more advanced but not starfaring?

Because our sun is pretty young by the standards of similarly metal-rich stars, and life appears to have started on this planet pretty much as soon as liquid water was able to exist on the surface, suggesting that the odds of life forming are very high. Unless we assume there was something very special about the inert rocks here (and it's generally considered poor science to assume we're in an unusual part of the universe), that in turn suggests that a similar process probably occurred around many other similarly metal-rich stars a billion of years before our planet existed. Even assuming life started on one of the other planets and migrated here via early-system impacts doesn't extend the timeline much (and if life migrated here from another star then it boosts the odds that the same thing happened to other stars as well)

And, given a billion-year head start, even one expansive space-faring species has had enough time to colonize the entire galaxy several times over by now. The fact that we see no evidence of that suggests that either we don't know how to look, or that in all that time not one species has arisen that is at all inclined to leave its home planet. Because once a species is firmly established in space, and thus has all the technology necessary for (slow) interstellar travel, and the proven inclination to expand beyond their world into artificial environments, it seems almost inevitable that some group will eventually head for another star - either for the uncontested riches waiting there, or to get away from a stellar civilization they find unpleasant, or even just out of curiosity.

First Ones

By jwhyche • Score: 3 • Thread

I always liked to think that we might be alone and we are the First Ones. First Ones as in Babylon 5 first ones. The universe is still young, 14B years, and has a lifespan predicted to be in the trillions of years. Some one has to be first, why not us?